Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes_GTEC_09.21.2011Minutes of the Meeting of Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation and the Governing Body of the City of Georgetown, Texas Wednesday, September 21, 2011 The Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation of the City of Georgetown, Texas, met on Wednesday, September 21, 2011. Board Members Present: Ray Armour - President, Richard Anderson - Vice President, Tommy Gonzalez - Secretary, Troy Hellmann, Rachael Jonrowe, Kevin Kelly Board Members Absent: One Vacant Spot Staff Present: Paul Brandenburg, Jim Briggs, Micki Rundell, Jana Kern, Ed Polasek, Bill Dryden, Bridget Chapman, Terri Calhoun, Mark Miller Others Present: Kent Sick - Attorney, Rick Klatt & Felipe Tudtud - HDR Engineering Minutes Regular Meeting Mr. Ray Armour called the regular GTEC Board meeting to order on Wednesday, September 21, 2011 at 2:00 PM Board may, at any time, recess the Regular Session to convene in Executive Session at the request of the President, a Board Member, the City Manager in his capacity as General Manager of the GTEC Corporation , the Assistant City Manager, or legal counsel for any purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code Chapter 551, and are subject to action in the Regular Session that follows. I. STAFF BOARD COMMENTS/QUESTIONS: (This is a short informational time regarding items where specific actions are not requested or needed) A. Introduction of visitors. B. Industry/CAMPO/TxDOT Updates: CAMPO has to two items of interest for us on www.campotx.org. They have an on line survey for the projects for the Proposition 12 ` fund and eligible projects for CAMPO funding under STP -MM. Under Williamson County there are three FM 1460 projects. Two are by the County and one is City of Georgetown. There will be an official public hearing on the items on September 26, 2011 at 6:00 PM. TxDOT has scheduled a meeting with City staff to discuss a bottleneck project between Northbound IH 35 frontage road and Austin Ave. The TxDOT bottleneck committee will be looking at everything from signal timing to lane improvements, with in the TxDOT budget. And that marries up to our North Austin Ave. improvements which we have in our project updates. C. Project Progress Reports: There were some changes to the Wolf Ranch Parkway and Southwest Bypass which will be discussed later on this agenda. D. Monthly Financial Report II. LEGISLATIVE REGULAR AGENDA: (This is for specific action items considered by the Board – greater than $50,000 in value) E. Consideration and possible approval of the minutes from the regular meeting held August 17, 2011 – Paul Brandenburg Discussion: None Action: Motion by Gonzalez, seconded by Hellmann to approve minutes as presented. Approved: 6-0-1(one vacant spot) F. Consideration and possible action to approve amendment of the Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation Bylaws. – Bridget Chapman Discussion: Chapman explained to the Board why the Bylaws were updated. Action: Motion by Gonzalez, seconded by Hellmann to approve the amended GTEC Bylaws. Approved: 6-0-1(one vacant spot) G. Consideration and possible action to change the time and/or date of the regular GTEC Board Meeting. – Rachael Jonrowe Discussion: Jonrowe requested the board and staff to consider changing the day and or time of the regular board meeting. There was lengthy discussion. Chair tabled the item until the next board meeting. Action: Chair will discuss with staff and board members and bring back to the next GTEC Board Meeting H. Discussion and possible action concerning a proposed Fourth Amendment to Task Order No. HDR-09-001 with HDR Engineering, Inc., relating to Wolf Ranch Parkway Extension TIP Project #14A in the amount of $8,503.00. – Ed Polasek/Bill Dryden Discussion: Dryden stated the City has contracted with HDR Engineering, Inc. to produce a design schematic of proposed ultimate four lane Wolf Ranch Parkway and plans, specifications and estimate for two lane segment of the ultimate design, inclusive of providing all documents for acquisition of right of way (ROW) and easements. This proposed amendment addresses two specific requirements of ROW document revisions. One for surveying services which includes fieldwork, office time to prepare and deliver two metes and bounds descriptions with sketches for the parcels required to be acquired for permanent ROW and permanent drainage easements for Wold Ranch Parkway. The second is for the revision of the previous surveys for the Wolf property to be compliant with the specifications for Land Title Surveys. This will include the plotting the roadways, fences, and other improvements to the sketches and addressing the Title Commitments as required for Land Title Surveys. This will also include the plotting of the final sketches and metes & bounds descriptions and making a CD containing electronic files. Action: Motion by Hellmann, second by Anderson to approve the fourth amendment to T.O. HDR 09-001 in the amount of $8,503.00. Approved: 6-0-1(one vacant spot) I. Discussion and possible action concerning a proposed Second Amendment to Task Order No. 1 with HDR Engineering, Inc., relating to Southwest Bypass TIP Project #14B in the amount of $6,205.00. – Ed Polasek/Bill Dryden Discussion: Dryden stated that the proposed Second Amendment to Task Order No. 1 (Amendment) addresses the specific changes scope of services requirements of the rights-of-way (ROW) document revisions. The technical work includes three separate items. The first is the survey services including fieldwork and office time to prepare and deliver five (5) metes and bounds descriptions with sketches for the parcels required to be revised due to the reduction in the ROW width for Wolf Ranch Parkway (WRP) from 200 ft. to 150 ft. which changed the ROW documents for Southwest Bypass (SWB) at the intersect ion with WRP. The second task covered includes the revision of the previous surveys for Weir, Knight and Wolf to be compliant with the specifications for Land Title Surveys. This includes the plotting the roadways, fences and other improvements to the sketches and addressing the Title Commitments as required for Land Title Surveys. Also included is the plotting of the final sketches and metes and bounds descriptions and making a CD containing electronic files for this information. The third task is to modify the parcel descriptions for SWB to tie into the metes and bounds description of the ROW survey previously performed by another surveyor for WRP. Action: Motion by Gonzalez, seconded by Hellmann to approve second amendment to T.O. #1 in the amount of $6,205.00. Approved: 6-0-1(one vacant spot) J. Overview of the Simon/Wolf Ranch Development Agreement and it's related impacts to GTEC. – Micki Rundell, CFO Discussion: Rundell explained the Wolf Ranch Development Agreement and how it impacts the funding for GTEC. There was lengthy discussion on this process. Action: None K Discussion and possible recommendation to approve a Reimbursement Agreement with Atmos Energy Corporation ("Atmos") in the amount of $1,171,700.00 for relocation of its gas pipe line facilities which are in conflict with the proposed construction of Southeast Arterial One. – Ed Polasek/Bill Dryden Discussion: Polasek stated that in our overall budget, there is a line item for utility relocation. Based on the utility owners estimates it's currently within our current overall budget. Atmos has proposed an agreement that the City would pay for the relocation of their line for $1,171,700.00. Polasek also stated that staff had been trying to negotiate with Atmos for about two years with no response. When staff told Atmos that we were going out for construction bid, all of a sudden we got a response. Staff was informed by Atmos that they were not going to be able to locate in the their current easement. We will have to relocate the easement and cross your road at a ninety degrees because that is the TxDOT policy. Polasek did mention that TxDOT is not involved with this project. There were several months worth of meeting discussing open trench cut vs boring. Atmos was instinct that they had to bore because their engineering told that was the way it needed to be done. Approximately six months later, Atmos came back and stated that it would be best to stay in the existing easements. We are currently have an agreement and have worked out the details, but we still have some concerns about budget and we are still discussing it. L. Discussion and possible recommendation concerning the acquisition of real property for improvements to Snead Drive. Ed Polasek/Terri Calhoun/Bridget Chapman Moved into Executive Session III. STRATEGIC PLANNING/ISSUES: EXECUTIVE SESSION CALLED TO ORDER 2:54 PM In compliance with the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, Government Code, Vernon ’s Texas Codes, Annotated, the items listed below will be discussed in closed session and are subject to action in the regular session that follows. M. Section 551.071 Consultation with Attorney & Section 551.072 Real Property. - Discussion concerning legal process for acquiring property rights necessary for relocation of Atmos gas line in connection with Southeast Arterial One Road Project. – Terri Calhoun/Ed Polasek/Bridget Chapman - Discussion concerning the acquisition of real property for improvements to Snead Drive.– Terri Calhoun/Ed Polasek/Bridget Chapman REGULAR SESSION CALLED BACK TO ORDER 3:47 PM N. Action from Executive Session - Action Item K & M - Atmos: Staff recommends to the Board to approve a motion to authorize the GTEC General Manger to engage Harrea & Boyle, specifically Jim Boyle - attorney, to represent GTEC on the matter Atmos Gas utility line relocation along Sou theast Arterial 1 & Southwestern Blvd. and return to the board with results of those negotiations. So Moved by Hellmann and seconded by Gonzalez. Approved: 6-0 (one vacant spot) Action Item L & M - Snead Drive: Motion by Gonzalez, seconded by Anderson for the acting City Attorney to contact the lender and see what all of the options are as discussed in Executive Session. Approved: 6-0 (one vacant spot) ADJOURN Motion by Hellmann to adjourn meeting Approved: 6-0 (one vacant spot) Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 03:50 PM. Approved : Attest: _______________________ ________________________ Ray Armour - President Tommy Gonzalez - Secretary