HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes_EDAB_09.25.2000MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
FOR THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS
MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 2000
Interim Chairman, Scott LaGrone, called the meeting to order at 5:30 o’clock p.m.
in the Police Department Training Room located at 809 Martin Luther King, Jr.
Street, Georgetown, Texas
The following members were present: Jack Pittman, Will Moore, Gordon Baker,
Mark D. Dixon, F. Scott LaGrone, Ann Clark Snell, Daniel Vasquez, Ken Evans,
Bill Connor, Johnny Lacy, and Clark Thurmond
Also present were: Facilitator Don Collier and Deputy City Secretary Shirley J.
Rinn
Members Gordon Baker and Ann Snell were sworn in by Rinn.
A. Discussion and possible action on selection of regular meeting times,
dates, location, and topics for discussion by the Commission for the
balance of 2000.
It was decided that the Economic Development Commission would meet
on the following tentative schedule:
DATE TIME
Monday, October 9, 2000 5:30 p.m. – 7:30 p.m.
Thursday, October 26, 2000 5:30 p.m. – 7:30 p.m.
Monday, November 13, 2000 5:30 p.m. – 7:30 p.m.
Thursday, November 30, 2000 5:30 p.m. – 7:30 p.m.
Monday, December 11, 2000 5:30 p.m. – 7:30 p.m.
Monday, January 8, 2001 5:30 p.m. – 7:30 p.m.
Thursday, January 25, 2001 5:30 p.m. – 7:30 p.m.
There was some discussion about the meeting place for the meeting. The
two locations that were discussed were the Police Department Training
Room and the Holiday Inn Express.
B. Discussion and possible action on adoption of by-laws for operation of the
Commission.
A sample copy of by-laws was passed out to the commission members for
their review. There was a brief discussion about the by-laws for the
Commission. Ann Snell volunteered to review the example of the by-laws
provided by Marianne Banks and to give her a call to discuss them. She
said that she would bring a draft back to the commission.
C. Discussion concerning memorandum from City Attorney outlining
Commissioners’ responsibilities under the Texas Open Meetings Act
and/or scheduling a date for a workshop with the City Attorney for the
Ethics Seminar required by City Ordinance
There was a brief discussion regarding open meetings. There was also
discussion regarding the attendance policy for commission members.
D. Discussion concerning job description and proposed salary range for
Economic Development Director
There was a lengthy discussion regarding the broad responsibilities
described in the Job Description for the Economic Development Director,
as well as the proposed salary range. Several of the commission
members expressed concern that the salary range was not sufficient to
recruit the best candidates that are available, as well as whether or not the
City would be able to offer “pay for performance” incentives in the
employment contract. It was noted that Council would have to approve
additional funding to increase the salary range. There was also discussion
as to how the Economic Development Director would not only have to
interrelate with the new IRR contractor once it is chosen and the
companies who fall under the definition of “industrial”, but also with
recruiters and CEOs of hotels, restaurants, and other companies that
relate to tourism. There was additional discussion regarding the need for
the Economic Development Director to have a very diverse background as
well as a strong management background. The members of the
commission also indicated that it was very important that the Economic
Development Director be an integral part of and work closely with the
Commission on its charge. Ann Snell volunteered to review the proposed
job description and present her recommendations to the City Manager for
his review.
E. Discussion and possible action on preparation of vision, mission,
objectives and goals for Commission.
Scott LaGrone briefly talked about the growth predictions for our area. He
indicated to the commission that the growth predictions didn’t take into
account whether Georgetown has a Economic Development Commission
or not and that the growth was coming to our area regardless of any
measures to “control the growth.”
There was a discussion of the “vision” each of the commission members
has for Georgetown and the desire for Georgetown to maintain its small
town charm, its identity and its historical nature. The Commission
discussed how they did not want Georgetown to become a “bedroom
community” for Austin. They discussed a need to keep Georgetown
economically viable without losing its identity, and for it to be a special
town with a “climate of opportunity” for everyone. The commission
expressed the need to bring “service businesses” to our city, and not
necessarily major manufacturing businesses that would “change the look”
of Georgetown, but at the same time, the commission felt the city should
support the creation of viable jobs within the community. They wanted
Georgetown to be special and for travelers to know that they had been
here. There was a general consensus among commission members that
Georgetown needed to continue to support its downtown square and to
encourage travelers to visit the square. There was additional discussion
regarding the need to preserve Georgetown’s town square and its
historical nature, the County Seat, the Courthouse its parks and rivers, as
well as Southwestern University.
The Commission discussed other unique cities that have dealt with similar
growth issues in Texas. Some of the cities mentioned were Grapevine,
Frisco, Westlake, and Highland Park, Texas. Don Collier was asked to
compile information on these and other cities regarding their planning
efforts for the growth issues they were facing. Mr. Collier mentioned that
the Task Force did something similar and that several of the committee
members contacted each city for information and brought it back to the
committee. There was also discussion regarding the need to take a look
at Georgetown’s Century Plan Element.
Commission members were given a copy of property tax valuations for the
last three years. There was a brief discussion regarding the same.
The meeting was adjourned at 7:30 o’clock p.m.