Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes_HARC_07.26.2012City of Georgetown, Texas Historic and Architectural Review CoM.IXIIiSSion Meeting Minutes Thursday, July 26, 2012, at 6:00 p.m - City Council and Municipal Court Building, Georgetown, TX 78627 101 E. 7.. Street, Georgetown, TX 78626 Members present: Dee Rapp, Chair; Sarah Blankenship; Jennifer Srovvrt, A.nria Eby, David Paul, Tim Urban, and Raymond Wahrenbrock. Commissioners in Training present: not applicable Members absent: none Staff present: Robbie Wyler, Historic District Planner; 'Laurie Brewer, Assistant City Manager;. and Karen Frost, Recording Secretary_ Regular Session - To begin no earlier than 6:00 p.m. The Historic and Architectural Review Commission, appointed by the Mayor and the City Council, is responsible for hearing and taking final action on applications,by issuing Certificates of Design Compliance based upon the City Council adopted Downtown Design Guidelines and Unified Development Code. (Commission may, at any time, recess the Regular Session to convene an Executive Session at the request of the Chair, a Commissioner, the Director or legal counsel for any purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code Chapter 551.) Rapp called the meeting to order at 6:05 p.m. Consent At_erxda- The Consent Agenda includes non -controversial and routine items that the Commission may act on with one single vote. A Commissioner or any member of the public may request that any item from the Consent Agenda be pulled in order that the Commission discuss and act upon it individually as part of the Regular Agenda. The Historic and Architectural Review Commission's approval of an item on the Consent Agenda will be consistent with the staff recommendation described in the report unless otherwise noted. 1_ Review and possible .approval of the minutes from the June 28, 2012 Regular f-IARC meeting and July 2, 2012 Special meeting. Blankenship asked that extra notes regardingitem number 3 be added to clarify comments by herself and Wahrenbrock. Rapp had several additions and corrections regarding item number 5 and additions to the public comments-. Frost explained she would be able to make the corrections for clarification as noted, but that the public comments are supposed to be summarized,, not detailed items of who stated exactly what. The audio recording of the meeting is kept for an exact record of the meeting should anyone have any questions. Motion by Paul to approve the minutes of the June 28 meeting and the July 2 special meeting as amended. Second by Urban. Approved 5 - O -2_ (Brown and Eby abstained as they were not present for the July 2 meeting.) Historical and tlrchttectural Commission Minutes July 26. 2012 t 2. Discussion and possible action on a Certificate of Design Compliance request for new business signage at City of Georgetown, Block 40, Lot 7 (nw/pt), also known as Georgetown Winery, located at 715 S. Main Street. (CDC-2012-030) 3. Discussion and possible action on a Certificate of Design Compliance request for new business signage at City of Georgetown, Block 2, Lots 1 — 8, also known as ai Monumento, located at 205 VV. 2^. Street. (CDC-2012-031) Urban reported that both items, 2 and 3, were discussed and action taken at the Sign Subcommittee meeting at 5:30. Item number 2 was partially approved, and Item number 3 was completely approved as submitted_ Regular Agenda: 4. Discussion and possible action on a Certificate of Design Compliance request for the construction of a playground pergola in Cold Towres Cutlot Division B, Block 10 (pt),_ also known as Grace Episcopal Church, located at 1314 E. University Avenue. (CDC-2012-028) Wyler presented the. staff report. The applicant seeks Certificate of Design Compliance approval from HARC to install a freestanding cedar pergola on site within an existing playground area. The playground is located immediately to the east/southeast of the church, just north of a parking area. The agent has designed an 11' by 1 2' cedar pergola that will be used to provide shade for the church's preschool and miscellaneous events. Atop the pergola will be art 8mm (1/2") polyearbonate material .that will be screwed down_ This material is also known as polygal. The polygal will act as another shade source as well as a protective barrier from the sun and inclement weather. Wyler stated the addition met Guideline 7.8 — Art addition shall be compatible in scale, materials and character with the main building. The applicant hasdesigned the pergola such that it blends in with the property and surrounding neighborhood. Many residential properties in Cold Town have wooden pergolas_ The main buildingis not affected and the size of the canopy remains relatively small compared to the church and playground area. The pergola will have low visibility from University Avenue. Wyler presented the applicant's agent, Mathew Channel of Southern Outdoor Appeal for commissioners to ask questions. Commissioners did .not have any questions and responded that they agreed with staff that this met the Guidelines. Rapp :opened the public hearing at 6:30 p.m. The public hearing was closed immediately with no :speakers coming forth. Motion by Urban to approve the CDC as presented. Second by Paul. Approved 7 - O. 5. Discussion and possible action on a Certificate of Design Compliance request for the relocation of an historic accessory structure in Old Town's Snyder Addition, Block 9 (pt), located at 11_02 E_ University Avenue. (CDC-2012-029) Wyler presented the staff report. The applicant seeks Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) approval from HARC to move an accessory structure to the south portion of his lot to make way for a circular driveway in the side/rear yard. The 12.25' wide by 20.20' long Historical and Architectural Commission Minutes July 26, 2012 2 historic wooden frame shed/garage will be moved approximately 50 feet from its current location near Olive Street to the back yard as shown on the provided survey. Ist its place, a circular driveway will be constructed to allow on -site parking_ At the new location, the structure will be used as a shed but will maintain a garage appearance. Wyler cited Guideline 7.13 — Only as a last resort should an historic structure be considered for demolition_ Rather than demolishing the structure to make way for the driveway, the applicant wishes to relocate and continue using. it. All required permits will be obtained prior to the relocation. Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Design Compliance - as proposed_ The historic accessory structure is being saved, just moved elsewhere on the property to make way for a driveway. Suzanne Grove was introduced as the applicant and available for questions. Ms. Grove explained that the reason for moving the structure was for safety reasons. In its present location the homeowners have to back out of their driveway into the busy street and close to a busy intersection_ Rapp explained that this property is across the street from her residence and fully supports this application, stating the neighbors had worked very hard to preserve and save the original structure_ Blankenship asked about a driveway to the proposed location of the structure. Ms. Grove explained that the structure would be moved off their current driveway to the back of a vacant lot which they own, behind their lot. 'Then their driveway will beextended onto the second lot to create a circular driveway, elianinatitg the need to back onto Olive Street and providing access to the structure. Urban questioned the foundation plan for the structure. Ms. Grove explained that the structurewas originally on a concrete slab_ It was elevated onto runners to allow moving. She said she and her husband would put the runners onto whatever surface the commission recommends. Wyler explained that the city will inspect the foundation for the building and it will be built to code_ Motion by Blankenship to approve the CDC as presented with the condition that the foundation of the structure be appropriate for the protection of the building. Second by Urban_ Approved 7 - O. 6. Election of a third Sign Subcommittee member to join Blankenship and Urban. Rapp welcomed Eby to the commission, explaining Susan Firth had resigned and therefore we needed a third member on the Sign Subcommittee. Wahreanbrock volunteered. Rapp nominates Wahrenbrocic for the Sign Subcommittee. Second by Urban. Approved 6 - O -1_ (Wahrernbrock abstained_) 7. Election of a third Demolition Subcommittee member to join Paul and Wahrerlbrock_ Rapp nominates Eby for Demolition Subcommittee. Second by Paul. Approved 6 - O - 1 (Eby abstained.) 8. Updates from staff and reminder about a possible August 8, 2012 HARC Sign Subcommittee meeting at the Georgetown Municipal Complex and August 23, 2012 1-1ARC/I3A1@C Sign Subcommittee meetings at Council Chambers. Historical and Architectural Commission Minutes July 26, 2012 a Wyler reported that there will not be an August 8 Sign Subcommittee meeting, but probably an August 23. meeting. He also reported the proposed, amended Design Guidelines were approved at First Reading by City Council on July 24. The Second Reading will be August 14", _ Wyler reported that None Winter, author of the Downtown Master Plan and Design Guidelines, will be making a presentation on the downtown "pedestrian friendly" area on August 15, 2012. All I -ARC Commissioners are invited. More information will be sent as to exact time and location. Waltrenbrock questioned the recent action by City Council inregards to the new absentee policy for boards and co+-•+*n+ssicats. Brewer explained that the recent changes will be sent via email by the city secretary's office_ That will be Forwarded to the commissioners. 9. Adjournment Rapp adjourned the meeting at 6:55 p.m- Appro ed, Dee Rapp, Chair Attest, David Paul, Secretary Historical and Architectural Commission Mirnu tea July 26, 2012