HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes_PAREB_03.14.2013Minutes of the Meeting of
the Parks and Recreation Board
City of Georgetown, Texas
Thursday, March 14, 2013
The Parks and Recreation Board of the City of Georgetown, Texas, met on Thursday , March 14, 2013.
Members Present:
B. Scott Finnel, Charles Brashear, Daniel Dance, John Hesser, Katherine Kainer, Keith Fruge
Members Absent:
Robert Johnson
Staff Present:
Micki Rundell, Kimberly Garrett, Eric Nuner, Jill Kellum, Laurie Brewer
Minutes 1
Regular Meeting
1. Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 pm by John Hesser.
2. Roll Call
John Hesser, Daniel Dance, Scott Finnel, Charles Brashear, Keith Fruge, Katherine Kainer
Absent: Robert Johnson
Staff: Micki Rundell, Kimberly Garrett, Eric Nuner, Jill Kellum, Laurie Brewer
3. Welcome and Introduction of new board members
Kimberly Garrett introduced the new board members, Charles Brashear and Scott Finnel. All
board members and staff introduced themselves.
4. Review and discussion
Kimberly Garrett explained the by-laws and the attendance policy for the Parks and Recreation
Board.
a. Advisory Board By -Laws
b. City Council Attendance Policy for Board Members
5. Consideration and possible action
a. Elect the Vice -Chair of the Parks & Recreation Board
Motion made by Katherine Kainer, second by Daniel Dance to elect Robert
Johnson as vice -chair to the Parks and Recreation Board. Approved 6 - 0
b. Elect the Secretary of the Parks & Recreation Board
Motion made by Daniel Dance, second by Keith Frage to elect Katherine
Kainer as Secretary to the Parks and Recreation Board. Approved 6 - 0
c. Set date and time for 2013 Parks & Recreation Board meetings
Motion made by Keith Fruge, second by Katherine Kainer to set the 2013
Parks and Recreation Meeting on the second Thursday of the month at 6 pm.
Approved 6 - 0
6. Overview of the City of Excellence and the 2013/14 annual budget process. Micki Rundell,
CFO
Micki Rundell introduced herself to the board and explained the City of Excellence is a vision
and it started as a council directive in May of 2011 during the budget process. They wanted to
see a 5 year plan. It was more looking at financial impacts and what was going to be the tax
rate. They used a lot of planning documents they already had; the 2030 plan, which is a public
document that has a lot of public participation in its creation, also various master plans such as
the parks master plan, the downtown master plan, utilities master plan and public safety
master plan as well as departmental strategic plans. Each department has a plan to implement
the goals of the 2030 plan over a 5 year period. So basically, they put pencil to paper to
determine what the costs were. So, the City of Excellence is, "what if" the city has completed
all the major projects that are really quality of life related; the amphitheater, the arts center,
park improvements and more parks, completed the public safety facility and it is operational,
there have been transportation improvements. All of these things identify the city as a premier
community and have managed our growth effectively and that Georgetown is a premier
community in Central Texas, and is renowned throughout the country as a wonderful place to
be. So to make this a reality we had to have a substantial revenue increase. All this
information was presented to the city council in July 2012. The council was overwhelmed as
everyone wants to be the City of Excellence. The council wanted to go back and do some
strategic planning and in September of 2012, staff worked with city council to create the
definition of what the City of Excellence is. The City of Excellence is the one that maximizes
the citizen's quality of life. Through that we also looked at very clear focused areas that we
wanted to put our resources to work. Within those resources the plan was to develop a fiscally
responsible plan that focused on these policy areas to alleviate and reduce future tax impacts to
the citizens. Those areas include economic development, signature destination, public safety,
transportation, and maintaining our utility services. All of these are very specific focus areas
and as staff we're all working forward.
So the 2013/2014 budget in relation to the signature destination, it supports the City of
Excellence vision and relates to quality of life improvements. The parks master plan
implementation is critical to that. To renovate and maintain our existing parks such as the play
scape renovation, San Jose Park rehab, continuing the trail expansion, continue our
preservation area along the river, plan to develop the west side park and the development of
Garey Park. In looking at that, the question is how do you fund that. In 2008, the City of
Georgetown voters approved 35.5 million to implement the parks master plan which included
all the elements above. To date only 2.5 million has been issued. When we went to the voters,
they said it would not be issued all at once and would be issued responsibly and would
minimize the tax implications. In April 2013, the council will adopt the 2013 bond issues and
they will issue an additional 5 million of that 35.5 million that was previously approved. That
will allow many of those projects to be implemented and to start the planning for Garey Park
and some of those major elements in the master plan that we have been waiting for a funding
source. That will leave 28 million of unauthorized bonds that will be available when the time
comes. The impact of that 5 million is less than a penny to the tax rate. The total amount, of
what has been issued of the 2008 parks bonds is a little over a penny. Again, that is well within
if not drastically less than what the voters were told they would have on the tax roll.
Micki Rundell presented why this was important. Recently the city completed its 2012 citizen
survey. This survey has a long history. The city has been doing surveys bi-annually since
2000. They gauge a lot of different elements of the city; whether it is transportation, quality of
life, what the people like about living in Georgetown, and what they would change. The
results of the recent survey, which there were very specific questionsabout parks,
unanimously supported the vision that is a signature destination and the parks as a critical
element to the City of Excellence. You will see that the appearance of the parks and other
questions were well over 80 - 90% satisfaction rating by our community. In fact, the
appearance and the accessibilities were outstanding and the overall quality was near 90%. This
is critical information that the community supports parks and recreation activities and
programs. The survey was of 964 residents that answered the 3 page questionnaire; some of it
was a written survey and some was internet based. It was a controlled survey with about a
95% accuracy ratio. One question was how much usage they had of any of the parks over the
past 12 months. 62% of the respondents had said they used San Gabriel Park. The hike and
bike trail and the recreation center were very highly utilized by the public. Then they asked a
question about the importance. Maintaining the appearance of city parks and facilities was
given a rating of over 91% and that was only second to maintain city roads and public service.
Again, that was a direct element, that quality of life issues such as parks is very important to
the community. 75% of respondents rated recreation as very important or somewhat
important. Again, there is a very positive support from the community. It was then asked
what they would rate the quality of those served and parks maintained 70% that said it was
either good or excellent. That is in the top 3 - 4 of all city services. Then overall citizen quality
of life was rated. Over 98% of the citizen's surveyed that the overall quality of life is either
good or excellent. The satisfaction indicators within these surveys were very positive for the
continued and the work the parks department does.
So as we go into the 2013/2014 budget focus were going to be focused on the goals outlined in
the signature destination business plan. Laurie Brewer is the business plan manager. The
signature destination includes many things such as the square and all the areas that are
important to bringing and keeping people in Georgetown. One of the major elements is the
implementation of the parks master plan. We need to continue the quality programs to meet
the community needs that include the implementation of the cost of service rates that have
been developed over the past few years. If you look at the recreation center, it pays for many
and most of itself. When you look at it compared to other centers throughout the state we
recover our cost of service more than any place else. We need to also address our maintenance
issue to extend the life of many of our parks. Again, doing the play scape renovations and the
rehabilitation of San Gabriel and Chautauqua parks and some of the other elements are key to
maintaining the numbers in the overall quality of life.
A signature destination is key to the success of the city and it is a vital role and parks play a
vital role in making sure that signature destination is unique and is well protected and valued
by the community. Parks and Recreation plays an important role in community satisfaction.
That was evident in the 2012 city citizen survey and that is again a continued trend from all the
th
surveys since 2000. This is the 6 one and in every one the value and the contributions that
Parks and Recreation make are evident in the survey. In conclusion, Parks does equal quality
of life and the quality of life is critical to the City of Excellence which again is the goal of the
city council and long term.
Micki Rundell stated there is a lot more to the City of Excellence; economic development,
transportation, public safety, and utilities. It is an integrated solution and an integrated review
and plan to promote this community and maintain the citizen satisfaction we currently have
and to continue to grow.
Laurie Brewer asked if there were any comments or any kinds of trend in the comments related
to parks and recreation that would be important to understand. Micki Rundell stated she feels
there are some trends. In reviewing the data you can see there are trends; she stated the
demographics in Georgetown are very unique. There is Sun City which use some of our parks
but not all of our parks and in a sense there is some relief by the citizens their using their own
facilities but again there was a lot of demand for more hike and bike trails, continued
improvements and amphitheater. All the things that we talk about and we plan for the
citizen's want.
Keith Fruge stated Micki Rundell presented information on signature destination but then talk
about quality of life for the citizen's; so are we trying to make it a destination for people outside
of the city? Micki Rundell we are trying to do both. She stated signature destination is
important because it brings sales tax, investment from other areas that in fact allows the city to
improve the quality of life without making the residents that are already here pay those
exorbitant prices to do that. The more valuation and more sales tax, the less we have to depend
on property tax rates. Laurie Brewer stated in a discussion with Chet Garner, host of Day
Tripper on PBS, he came and spoke at one of the downtown meetings and he said what people
are searching for in tourism is a local experience. They don't want anything that is
manufactured so what we need to focus on is what we do well and what our signature is.
Some of our signature elements are our natural features that are preserved by the parks; the
two rivers, San Gabriel Park and Blue Hole. The square itself and the pocket parks the parks
department maintains around the square and the caves. Laurie Brewer stated there needs to be
education with our own citizens of the signature elements we have and they can be
ambassadors to their friends and family that come into town. She stated when you bring
people to town you show off what you have such as Blue Hole, San Gabriel Park, Garey Park,
restaurants, Inner Space Caverns, and the Palace Theater which are unique to Georgetown.
Micki Rundell stated the City of Excellence vision is something we have all been working
toward. It never had a defined goal and the council has been supportive of developing that
goal and embracing that goal and moving forward with the implementation of the goal. In the
past we have all been working toward to that but it was never outlined in these 5 particular
areas. She stated the work the Board does in supporting those goals, that it was clearly evident
by the survey results.
7. Discussion on the Parks Master Plan and the shared vision and relationship between Parks,
Downtown, CVB and Arts & Culture Master Plans, the City of Excellence and a Signature
Destination
Kimberly Garrett stated at the February meeting there was discussion regarding revisiting the
parks master plan and the priorities listed. The parks master plan was completed in 2009 with
the top priorities being funded in the 2008 parks bond. While most of these projects have not
been completed, there is a funding source and most items are in progress or align with future
projects. The top priorities are shown on the executive summary form that is attached
Also discussed at the last meeting was a possible downtown/festival park which is part of the
City of Excellence and a Signature Destination. This vision is shared among the CVB and the
Arts and Culture Boards. These boards just recently created master plans and visioning
sessions which included the downtown festival park. This vision was also included in the
Parks Master Plan and the Downtown Master Plan.
There is no action posted for this item, it is just an opportunity to continue the discussion
regarding future projects related to the parks master plan. Copies of the above mentioned
master plans and reports are attached.
John Hesser asked if there any projections on the expected result of the master plan as far as
enhanced business. Micki Rundell stated that is something they will be working on as they
develop this. There are not numbers currently but she stated that they know it is demanded by
the community as they approved everything that was on the bonds. Laurie Brewer stated the
quality of life things are the hardest to measure, because of the impact from a park. She has
been researching the economic impacts of a park and especially urban parks as we look at this
downtown pocket park in front of the art center. There have been studies done in bigger cities
at how the property values around parks go up because that becomes much more attractive
and much more valuable to people. She feels the way we are measuring for that now is
through the citizen survey. There are still people who want to come and live here and visit
here and our citizen's feel the quality of life is high. As we go on we can measure some of the
impact of the parks. We have figures on the revenue it generates, but what is the true impact
when you have soccer or baseball tournament and you have people in town. There are
industry standards that state that every visitor who is here for the day spends $142.35. You
start calculating that and the parks bring in people you can calculate the economic impact to
the city. That is revenue coming in from the outside being spent here. Laurie Brewer stated
we will be doing more of that as council gets more into it to measure but for now the citizen
survey has been the only form of measurement. Micki Rundell stated we will be looking at
ways to communicate some of the events and facilities available in Georgetown. She stated the
Rivery Conference Center and hotel is going to be about 68 million of new investment in the
community and it is here because of the location next to Rivery Park. There is certain dynamics
and specific projects that can be tied to the Rivery Park that will be marketed by the hotel such
as access to the hike and bike trail, and the river. There is a tremendous financial impact we
just have to find a better way measure it.
Laurie Brewer stated Parks and Recreation is ahead of the curve as they have a master plan and
the Downtown is updating the downtown master plan. CVB and Arts and Culture have not
had a master plan up to this point. Parks and Recreation has had the foresight to have a master
plan and have long range projects planned out. As these other groups work on plans for the
next 5 —10 years that will be shared with the Parks and Recreation Board. Kimberly Garrett
stated that all the other plans tie back to the parks. The Arts and Culture board is doing the art
center downtown and they have the art downtown in the pocket parks, but one of their main
goals is to do an art park downtown in the festival area. CVB is in the early stages of their
goals are around things the Parks and Recreation master plan already has. In the downtown
master plan done 10 years ago there was talk then about a festival park downtown, and civic
center. In the Parks and Recreation master plan, it specifically talks about a downtown festival
park. The City Council and the community have identified this as a top priority in the
signature destination. Kimberly Garrett showed the top priorities from the master plan and
she states they are still all important and they are in progress and there is a funding source for ,
some of them. She asked if there is something new and different that has not been
accomplished. This was asked of the board last meeting to come up with these ideas.
Keith Fruge stated we have a lot of parks and hike and bike trails. He stated the San Gabriel
Park is the
"Central Park" of Georgetown and it is run down. The facilities are not in good shape, the
parking is not that great. He stated if we polish it up and decide what we really want out of
San Gabriel Park and start using some of the unused areas it will be utilized. Kimberly Garrett
stated there was 10 million passed in the bond for improvements to San Gabriel Park including
an amphitheater. We have the funding for the San Gabriel Park improvements to update the
pavilions, restrooms and the parking and those are all top priorities and that can definitely be a
focus. The funding has been approved but has not all been allocated. There is 1 million to be
used on San Gabriel Park for the bank stabilization and this is a #1 priority as the river is taking
over the park. Kimberly Garrett stated with that project being done, it will help define more
what to do with that space. She stated with that we can get a theme throughout the park. We
don't want to renovate one thing, we want everything to match and be consistent. Eric Nuner
stated the bank stabilization is the precursor to adding amenities to the park and updating the
park. John Hesser asked what the criteria are for selecting the priorities. Kimberly Garrett
stated the master plan priorities were based on citizen comments. John Hesser explained that
infrastructure comes before; he stated the citizen's input is important however they may not
know the bank is a problem. He stated the priorities could be reprioritized as far as how you
spend your money where you want to go. Daniel Dance stated not all parks can be everything
to everybody. Each established park and future parks have their own theme. Kimberly Garrett
stated that some of these parks are identified in the master plan as neighborhood or
community parks and they have elements that are in each park. She stated prioritizing goes
back into the capital maintenance, which is a fee schedule of every part and the condition of
every piece of equipment and what the useful life is, this will be used to prioritize items in each
park. We are now in the build, maintenance and grow mode. Eric Nuner explained the
different parks such as community, regional and neighborhood parks all have different types
of amenities. John Hesser stated safety, preservation and rehabilitation should help make a
decision on priorities. Writing these down will also help justify to the citizens what you are
doing. Scott Finnel stated he would like to see more hike/bike trails and for them to be all
connected. Kimberly Garrett stated this is the most money that has been allocated in the bond
for San Gabriel Park. John Hesser stated if you attract more people here you have to worry
about traffic and where are you going to park. John Hesser stated, are we prepared and is the
infrastructure is here to accommodate. Daniel Dance asked if there is utilization and if people
know about certain facilities we have to offer. The board asked if there is a marketing budget
and Laurie Brewer stated there is not a marketing budget. Laurie Brewer stated that the Day
Tripper on PBS is filming in Georgetown and highlighting the challenge course. Kimberly
Garrett stated that in the survey it showed that most people got their information from the
Williamson County Sun and the Community Impact. Scott Brashear asked who we are
marketing to bring into the city. Laurie Brewer stated CVB is doing a market study and have
done license plate surveys. It has shown that most people come from the Dallas Metroplex
area or within a 20 mile radius of Georgetown. Laurie Brewer stated we have to go a step
further and get actual surveys at hotels and to do that same statistically valid research from our
tourism dollars to figure out where we need to put that advertising. Ideas are listing in the
Texas Monthly, magazines in hotels in the Dallas area and advertising in hotels at the card
racks. The CVB is working with sport organizations and bringing tournaments to Georgetown.
Kimberly Garrett stated she wanted to bring the master plan back to the board to talk about the
festival park and the transition of moving that downtown. She stated CVB, the Library, the
Arts and Culture Board and Parks and Recreation will work together on this comprehensive
document. Laurie Brewer stated that within two months there will be a draft document that
can be shared that the board can review and give comments and changes. John Hesser stated
he sees a long term plan is a living document that goes on for a period time but needs to be
revisited periodically because circumstances change all the time. He asked how long it had
been since it was looked at. Kimberly Garrett stated the master plan was adopted in 2009 and
all the items in the master plan are in progress and that we are looking at and are in various
stages. There was some talk about the rodeo arena and lease will be coming up and how that
will change the whole master plan. Kimberly Garrett stated we could look at the master plan
annually as a board or as needed. She stated when we start the Westside Park that will be the
opportunity to do some citizen surveying and see if priorities change. John Hesser stated there
has to be an expected result to know when we got finished that we achieved what we did or
didn't, so we know next time. Keith Fruge stated with San Gabriel Park it is utilized a lot but if
it continues to go downhill it could hurt the utilization in the future. Kimberly Garrett stated 5
million will be allocated and a million of that was toward San Gabriel Park improvements; the
bank stabilization and developing what we could do with San Gabriel Park.
8. Update, discussion and final recommendation to City Council on future cemetery proposal
John Hesser stated the I.O.O.F. was deeded to the City of Georgetown on 1978. It is operated
by the Parks and Recreation Department. Funds from sales and other fees go to offset the
expenses and maintenance of the cemetery. The I.O.O.F. is anticipated to reach capacity
around 2040 with no revenue in the future to offset expenses and maintenance. Property and
funds were given to the city at the time of the transfer. We also have Citizen's Memorial
cemetery that is maintained by the city and the city owns the land. There is no revenue from
plots sales or fees to offset the expenses and maintenance. The Citizen's Memorial Association
assigns the plots to be used. People who are members of this association are qualified to be
buried there. There are not steps being taken to apply to state law. The plots are not plotted.
There is more development going on around it and he feels there will be pressure to clean the
cemetery up. John Hesser assessed there is a long term unfunded liability and there is a
perpetual care issue that will come out of tax money. John Hesser stated he contacted other
cities on what they do with their cemeteries. He stated his recommendation is not like what
other cities is doing. When the cemetery reaches it capacity what is going to be the solution for
residents to be buried in the future. He stated he did find cities that have 501c3 organizations
and some that do not and some that have cemetery boards that run the 501c3. The boards
range from 5 —13 members and boards with more than 5 members complained there were too
many people on the board and no decisions could be made. John Hesser's recommendation
would be keep it at a small number of board members. Cities with perpetual care
incorporations and without incorporations; what he found was cities that had this 501c3 and
found where the funds were set aside on the books. Most often they were controlled by the
Parks or the Street Departments. One 501c3 did the activity; they sold the plots, maintained it
and did the investment and they were not very happy. He said in his research he found
various levels of success. John Hesser is recommending that a 501c3 be established. He did get
the IRS policy out and it has a 501c3 set aside of the purpose of cemeteries. There are more and
more states that require a perpetual care fund as a matter of law and the state of Texas does
that as well. This will push us towards compliance as far as state law is concerned and he
states there may be an exemption of the I.O.O.F. transfer. The 501c3 will have to be funded and
the funds can be gathered in several ways. The money collected will be put in a fund and build
it. He stated that money would be put in a trust immediately with the idea that the city would
continue to pay for the maintenance until they reach the money needed. John Hesser
recommends the cemetery be left reporting to the Parks Department as they have done a good
job on what they are doing and seems to work. He would recommend a board of 4 - 5
members; parks director, 1 city councilmember, a finance staff person, someone from the
Citizen's Memorial Association, and a funeral director. He recommends establishing a mission
statement and policies and a long range plan and budget that would help focus and would not
have this burden on the city taxes. He stated it might be a small amount but feels this would be
a good business solution to the issue. John Hesser will present this proposal to City Council on
th
April 9 . Keith Fruge asked; the money that is collected and has been collected where does it
go. Kimberly Garrett stated it goes toward offsetting the cost. Eric Nuner stated internally the
cemetery is treated like another park; it is another facility we maintain. Kimberly Garrett
stated if the council wants to go this direction it would be brought to them through the budget
process as a program and project as there will be funds associated with legal work and
establishing the 501c3.
Motion made by Scott Finnel, seconded by Daniel Dance to recommend to City Council the
future cemetery proposal as presented by John Hesser.
9. Discussion and possible direction to staff on options to ensure a family friendly
environment at Blue Hole Park
John Hesser stated the issues at Blue Hole Park; alcohol in particular and jumping off the cliffs;
the board feels it should be a family friendly area. The discussion is on how to handle to
alcohol issue. It was asked if the city council would give the authority to post signs for no
alcohol areas at Blue Hole Park. The other issue is the cliff jumping. There are signs posted
and there are ordinances to keep people off the cliffs and no jumping. The police would have
to witness the violation in order to enforce. Keith Fruge stated there has been lot vandalism.
There was discussion on increased police presences and video surveillance but this is a
challenge and expensive option. He stated no drinking is a positive step but unless it is
enforced it doesn't help. Kimberly Garrett explained that after the flood in 2007 the road was
washed away. The road prior to the flood was accessible by the public and the activity was not
as bad as the police had better access as well. The road is not a through street any longer and
police cannot get through there as quickly. Kimberly Garrett stated the police do have
alternate access points to the park. Eric Nuner explained that with the new restaurant there it
is more positive activity in the area and you can see the area and activity. People may feel like
there are more eyes on them. Keith Fruge stated Blue Hole is a focal point of Georgetown. It
would be good to put some effort into keeping it nice. Daniel Dance stated with the City of
Excellence idea; the parks and the infrastructure is a huge endeavor of the city; Chief Nero
needs to be on board with this as well and not with just Blue Hole but all city parks. There
needs to be more integration with the police department. He stated he feels it is enforcing the
rules we already have. Kimberly Garrett stated she could ask the Chief or Assistant Chief with
the Police Department to attend the next meeting.
Motion made by Daniel Dance, second by Katherine Kainer to have staff reach out to the
Police Department to begin a discussion to have a comprehensive plan for park safety and
presence not only at Blue Hole but in everything that is going on and coming up and make it
a family friendly environment. Approve 6 - 0
10. Update from the Parks and Recreation Board Aquatics Subcommittee
Katherine Kainer stated the subcommittee met with staff and was given a presentation on the
pools. The repairs and priorities were discussed on all the pools. It was decided that any time
we started repairs we would have to follow code and once that gets started you have to go all
the way. The viability of the Tennis Center was discussed and the possibility of presenting to
the board with a firm closing date of that pool. Stephanie Darimont and Robert Johnson are
going to meet before the next subcommittee meeting and they are going to compile a specific
list of priorities, repairs, costs and time frame. They discussed aquatic trends, usage and
revenue such as the spray grounds and play features. The subcommittee will meet again on
nd
April 2 . Kimberly Garrett stated the entire Tennis Center is on the CIP list.
11. Update from the Friends of Georgetown Parks and Recreation
th
Kimberly Garrett stated the Friends of Georgetown Parks and Recreation met on March 4 and
are redefining their goals. In the April meeting they are going to work on the strategic plan.
There was an organization that attended the Friends of Georgetown meeting that supports the
Bark Park. Georgetown Swims is going strong and have some volunteer with that. They just
finished a fitness initiative through the Friends, the Trim Down Challenge, and it was
successful. John Hesser stated they just started another one and it was bigger than the last
class. Some of the participants that dropped out Last time came back for this session due to the
nutrition portion. There were prizes and incentives for people to join and lose weight. Keith
Fruge asked what the liaison from the Parks and Recreation Board does. Kimberly Garrett
stated they go to the meetings. They make sure to communicate anything from the board that
is in concert with what they are doing. One of the biggest things that is going to come up in the
next month or two is bringing the play scape and the opportunity to raise money. It is a link
between the board and the friends group.
12. Appoint Parks and Recreation board member as a liaison to the Friends of Georgetown
Parks and Recreation
Keith Fruge will go to the next meeting. This item was tabled.
13. Approve minutes from the February 14, 2013 meeting
Motion made by Katherine Kainer, second by Keith Fruge to approve the February 14, 2013
meeting. Approve 6 - 0
14. Adjourn
Motion made by Joh4 Hesser to adjourn the meeting. The meeting adjourned at 9:21 pm.
iiLj
John?' I
Hesser
Chair - Parks and Recreation Board
Katherine Kainer
Secretary - Parks and Recreation Board
Board Liaison — Parks and Recreation Board