HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes_CVSVS_11.13.2014Minutes of Meeting for the
Civil Service Commission
City of Georgetown
November 13, 2014 at 9:00 AM
The Civil Service Commission met on November 13, 2014 at 9:00 AM at Georgetown City Council
Chambers, located at 101 E 7 th St. Georgetown, Texas 78626.
In attendance:
Glenn Mautner, Place I Hank Michel, Place 2 James W. Montgomery, Place 3
Regular Session
A. Approval of minutes from September 18, 2014 meeting.
\4otioll I'w oillill, Ndicliel. 2" b; "mmi-i. kloiiiu-joiiicr\ -- 3-0
B. Recognize former Commissioner John Wood Sr. for years of service on the Commission.
Cllain"1a11 NIll-li'ller Coill ill issiollel''Itflill wood Si-. ail"I ir- \"Vood
a F)laqu e I 'roili dic CiN,'il Sel-N ice I)ii-ectOr. Nvh% ""N',00CA cl(kiressel-I dietildieiice inid eNpresseci iik
'lpprcc at! k L 1
K oll I )r fl,'c award 1
C. Discuss process for handling submitted promotional appeals.
Director briefed dw Coiiii,�issioil oyll a for 11"I(icli illi-, apps, l Is
D. Discussion and possible action for appeal submitted on question #53 of Driver/Engineer
promotional exam.
Cllildidate i'es, indec cippeai. 1)irecio!' ivild and ciiididaic- caiiie to fnm) to coiffil'ill
\vithdr,mal (..'olmnlssl,0n approved the %vlthdi',ntal ol'il-ic aj)peaL
E. Discussion and possible action for appeal submitted on question #84 of Driver/Engineer
promotional exam.
L)ireclor I)reseil'ted file appeal i111(1 file callclidilte fliat 1'11ed the apl)eifl spot! e Oil the re'lsollill(4
behilld his 1pt al. Follo"\ ill,L, Colmnissioll cliscitissioji, the aiisl,voi- kev vvas sLjstaltied. kfi)li'on
b'' Colillil by (.'oimil Alit llel- 3-0 aj)[)eal sLiswiii.
F. Discussion and possible action for appeal submitted on question 991 of Driver/Engineer
promotional exam.
[)Ircctor I)1-c)\ided tile apjxeal ill Ftorll-Mliol'i "'llid dle c,,iiidicLitc fl-lat it tile laj)jieil si)oke oil the
r'-'asollill" bcc llilld the Collliliissiotl idiscusse(l tile appeal tiild %'oted it) ',)\ Orn[IQ the
a tis\%ci- ke\anclept ilSWl- C & 1). Vote to 0\,Cl-Citi; the k -Y 3
-0
G. Discussion and possible action for appeal submitted on question #92 of Driver/Engineer
promotional exam.
F)irector pw\`ide(i dic il)pcal Itif'onmatioii aild the caildidate that tiled the appe.al sl -)'-)lie oll 1110
I'CZIS011illL� bellilld Ill(-' SLIbIllitted 'Ippe"IL Cl-liel'stillivall [)!-esellted Ills Olou'ollis ol, \vIly the
qM'StIO11 SIl()UId he SUSWi1leCI, (1iiet'Sifflivaii decoilsti-ticted the question atic] I)r(wided
illi'onliatioil based it tile source inlitenal. Coimnissioii disctissed tile al)pe.d and %,oleci 'to
sustairt theaiis�\,er kcv. Stistaiii Kev ',-0
H. Discussion and possible action for appeal submitted on question #94 of Driver/Engineer
promotional exam.
!)Rector pivsented Me appeal in%nmion and A camUdate that subi-nined the appeal yvke
on to reasoning behVild We appeal, Clief Suillvan syle on We question and We appeal ;n KI
pnwWal k0mmion based on Me source material, diflerence bemeell specnators -and
Sarnar-Aws. The UrrinAssion discussed tile SllbulittCd 1pf)eal and voted toelinlinate fhw
qucsti1mL The question was (Icenied to be not a valid queykvn� 3-0
1. Discussion and possible action for appeal submitted on question #14 of Lieutenant
promotional exam.
[Wector presented the appeal suid the candidate spoke on the behind l`iling We
a a -SullWan provided ins"Itt on questIon at din ruptem of Me Clortinlinkm.
ppeal. Chict
Conindmion voted to ranove the question froni thc, exam. Elinninate the 1,UeS0011 3-0
J. Discussion and possible action for appeal submitted on question #61 of Lieutenant
promotional exam.
!)Rector presented the appeal and the catidVime sple "Ith Me NOE to "ThWk hk aMwA
Comnlinkm vowd to sintairl the key and Alm,, the eandidate, to withdraNN the
K. Discussion and possible action for appeal submitted on question #69 of Lieutenant
promotional exam.
I)hvctor presented the appeal aim! candidate presented kil'ormation related to 'the appcal,
Commission discussed jmvsenled KiRwi-nation arm! voted to sustain Me anmva kev Sumain
ke; 3-0
L. Discussion and possible action for appeal submitted on question #92 of Lieutenant
promotional exam. Candidate #1
lNector presented the appeals till, Heins 1. A and N hand on Me appeals all peruihihg to
the same citwstion.
M. Discussion and possible action for appeal submitted on question #92 of Lieutenant
promotional exam. Candidate #2
[)Rector pl-eserned Be appeals Ir hems 1. A and N band on dw apiaeak all perwhAng to
Ilii: same quenion
N. Discussion and possible action for appeal submitted on question #92 of Lieutenant
promotional exam. Candidate #3
Nrector presented the appeals for items 1— M. and IN based on We appeals all permirlitig to
tile sanle qtiestion.
Cotinnission dknowd the apivakd irtRwrilmion and voted to ehridnate the queqkm Boni the
exam. Eliminaw We quemW 34)
O. Discussion and possible certification of the Fire Driver/Engineer Promotional List.
FoHoNWm; a hHefrecess, commission revicwed and voted to certify the updated eliglibililN, list
for the I)river promotional list, 3-0
P. Discussion and possible certification of the Fire Lieutenant Promotional List.
CommissAi reviewed and voted to cenHA the updated cligjbility list lor tile IJeUtenalit
promotional 101. 3-0
Q. Civil Service Director will brief the Commission on upcoming items.
Director briel'od the commission on We current slaws ofthe Police fkpannwnt Win -
process.
Nrector iiffoniied the Coinniission about the Fire 1"3l ry exani Inid provided flic stats or
c-11, iid idaws.
R. Discussion and possible action to set the date and time for the next meeting.
Coniniissioii suaoesied tilai %N,.- coi€act 4Iia enuill al a later Claw to deternline tile tillic r(-)I- Flip`
1,4c'12 Ille"nill". "o eer!ik Ille Fire Elltry EmIIII.
S. Adjourn
Ac 'ourn Motion h\, Micliel second [�y '\,Ioiitc_,on-1ery
Approve Attest:
,(4,4
Glenn autner, Chair Tadd Phillip l-,�il �ge�_ry ce Director
