HomeMy WebLinkAbout0387_382382
That a majority of the legally qualified property taxpaying voters who own taxable
property in said City and who had duly rendered the some for taxation, voted Against
the issuance of the bonds, and the levying of a tax inpayment thereof, as submitted
in Proposition No. 5.
That a majority of the resident qualified voters, being the legally qualified tax-
paying voters who own taxable property in the City and who duly rendered some for
taxation and the other resident qualified voters, voted Against the issuance of the bonds,
and the levying of a tax in payment thereof, as submitted in Proposition No. 5.
That a majority of the legally qualified property taxpaying voters who own taxable
property in said City and who had duly rendered the same for taxation, voted Against
the issuance of the bonds, and the levying of a tax in payment thereof; as submitted
in Proposition No. 6.
That a majority of the resident qualified voters, being the legally qualified tax-
paying voters who own taxable property in the City and who duly rendered some for,
taxation and the other resident qualified voters, voted Against the issuance of the
bonds, and the levying of a tax in payment thereof; as submitted in Proposition No. 6.
That a majority of the legally qualified property taxpaying voters who own taxable
property in said City and who had duly rendered the same for taxation, voted Against
the issuance of the bonds, and the levying of a tax in payment thereof, as kubmi tted
in Proposition No. 7.
That a majority of the resident qualified voters, being the legally qualified tax-
paying voters who own taxable property in the City and who duly rendered same foe
taxation and the other resident qualified voters, voted Against the issuance of the bonds,
and the levying of a tax in payment thereof, as submitted in Proposition No. 7:
That a majority of the legally qualified property taxpaying voters who own taxable
property in said City and who had duly rendered the some for taxation, voted Against
the issuance 6f the bonds, and the levying of a tax in payment thereof, as submitted
in Proposition No. 8,
That a majority of the resident qualified voters, being the legally qualified tax-
paying voters who own taxable property in the City and who duly rendered same for
taxation and the other resident qualified voters, voted Against the issuance of the bonds,
and the levying of a tax in payment thereof, as submitted in Proposition No. 8.
That a majority of the legally qualified property taxpaying voters who own taxable
property in said City and who had duly rendered the some for taxation, voted Against
the issuance of the bonds, and the levying of a tax in payment thereof, as submitted
in Proposition No. 9.
That a majority of the resident qualified voters, being the legally qualified tax-
paying voters who own taxable property in the City and who duly rendered same for
taxation and the other resident qualified voters, voted Against the issuance of the bonds,
and the e� vying of a tax in payment thereof; as submitted in Proposition No. 9.
PASSED AND APPROVED at a meeting open to the public this the 30th day of
April, 1974, after public notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting was
given and posted as required by law.
ATTEST:
i ty Secretary Joe E. �rawford, ayo