HomeMy WebLinkAbout0057_564. Minimum Depth. One Hundred (100) feet.
6. Corner Lots. Corner lots with a width of less than seventy-five (75) feet are to
e at five (5) feet wider than average of interior lots in. the block.
Corner Lots with a width of less than eighty-five feet adjacent to a major thorough-
fare are to be at least fifteen (15) feet wider than the average of interior lots in
the block.
9. Lot Facing. b. Double Front. Double front lots are prohibited except when
backing on major thoroughfares.
c. Front Facing. Wherever feasible, each lot should face the front of a similar
lot across the street. In general, an arrangement placing adjacent lots at right
angles to each other should be avoided.
5.07 - Improvements
1. Monuments. Concrete monuments eight (8) inches in diameter and fifteen (15)
inches long shat be placed at all block corners and at all corners of the boundary lines of
a subdivision. The exact intersection point on the monument shall be marked by a rein-
forcing bar one-half (1/2) inch in diameter and twelve (12) inches long embedded in
the concrete monument.
Intermediate property corners, curve points and angle points shall be marked with
a piece of one-half (1/2) inch round reinforcing rod driven flush with the finished ground
level or lower if necessary in order to keep same from being disturbed.
RESOLUTION
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN,
TEXAS, APPROVING PRICE AND CONDITIONS OF BID BY WALLACE LUERSEN
ON LOT 1, BLOCK 7, CITY OF GEORGETOWN, WILLIAMSON COUNTY,
TEXAS (TO BE KNOWN AS A PART OF BLOCK 0, SOUTH SAN GABRIEL
URBAN RENEWAL ADDITION TO THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, WILLIAMSON
COUNTY, TEXAS, AFTER RE -PLATTING).
WHEREAS, on the 26th day of
of Georgetown, Texas, received a
Gabriel Urban Renewal Project Tex
BIDDER
Wallace Luersen
PARCEL NO.
0-1
March, 1976, the Urban Renewal Agency of the City
bid on the following parcel situated in the South San
R-102:
AMOUNT OF BID MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE
PRICE
$1,200.00 $1,200.00
WHEREAS, the Urban Renewal Agency of the City of Georgetown, acting by and
through its executive director, has recommended acceptance of said bid; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds nothing objectionable concerning the price and
conditions of said bid as submitted, and the recommendation of the Executive Director
of Urban Renewal Agency; now therefore be it
RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas:
That the price and conditions set forth in the above bid for the parcel listed are hereby
approved, subject, however, to formal approval to be furnished the City Council.
ADOPTED this 12th day of April, 1976.
ATTEST:
4000 %/City Secr(;iary
I�Lc.�
John C. Doerfler, Mayor
APPROVED BEFORE ADOPTION:
Joe B. McMaster, City Attorney