HomeMy WebLinkAbout0087_0001COMMENTS: I.
II.
U1 .
Plat and support documents should conform
to requirements of P.U.D. ordinance.
The following ordinance requirements concerning
lots have not been met:
A. Area less than 6000 square feet,
B. Front width less than 60 feet and/or average
depth less than 1Q0 feet,
C. Lots fronting on two non intersection streets,
D. Lots placed at right angles to other lots,
E. 25 foot front yard setback is reduced to
either 10 feet or 15 feet, (variance is requested)
F. 7 foot side yard setback is reduced to 5
feet or zero feet, (variance is requested)
G. Elimination of public utility easements
along rear and side lot limits.
[Complete evaluation of these variances cannot
be completed until a more detailed site plan is
reviewed. However, in general, it is the recom-
mendation of the staff that the size and shape
of lots be increased: to accommodate the resi-
dential units described in the "Product Justifi-
cation" section of proposal; to provide a mini-
mum 15 foot front yard; to provide minimum side
yards as required for spacing of structures; to
conform to standards for maximum coverage by
structures, maximum impervious cover, and requir-
ed private open space; and to reduce or make
special provisions for lots at right angles and
double frontage lots. Staff has no ob3ection to
elimination of rear and side utility easements.]
The following ordinance requirements regarding
streets have not been met:
A. Private streets are allowed in P.U.D.'s but
should have a minimum 50 foot R.O.W. especial-
ly if they contain utilities. Complete
review of substandard roadway widths will
require submittal of typical street and util-
ity layout cross-section.
B. 75 foot street center line radius on Rachel
Court should be increased and requested vari-
ance not granted.
Z