HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda CC 03.25.1986THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA MARCH 25, 1986 7:00 PM 1. Minutes 2. Bills over $2,000.00 3. Certificates of Appreciation - Carl Doering 4. Award Crystal Knoll utility lines bid - Allyn Moore 5. Award Community Center roofing bid - Ray Green 6. Award (2) micro -computer systems bid - Terry Jones 7. San Gabriel Lift Station - Frank Reed S. Resolution - changes in the 1985 tax roll - Barbara Raney 9. B.R.A. - R.T.T.S option selection - Renee Hanson 10. Planning Items: A. Variance - Building line - 614 Meadowbrook Dr. B. Variance - Fence - 1700 Leander Rd. C. Variance - Reinstatement of Final Plat - Tricorners D. Variance - Subdivision Ordinance Section 3.05 - Williamsburg Village E. Ordinance - Amendment to Historic Preservation Section of Zoning Ordinance - 2nd Reading F. Planning Report 11. C.L.G. Grant project proposal - Ed Barry 12. Pleasant Valley Plat Fees - Ed Barry 13. Engineering Review Fees collection - Ed Barry 14. Swimming pool operation - Frank Reed 15. Police facility change order - Hugh C. Anderson III 16. Police department monthly report - Hugh C. Anderson III 19. Public Works facility - Allyn Moore 20. Infiltration and Inflow Proposal - Allyn Moore 21. Resolution - affirming the name of the Madella Hilliard Neighborhood Center - Carl Doering 22. Confirmation of assistant election judge - Pat Caballero 23. Executive session under art. 6252-17 sec. 2 (e) litigation Misc. 1 - City of Georgetown Planning Report for the March 11, 1986 7:00 pm Planning Items A) Consent Items: 1. Variance - Reinstatement of Final Plat- South Georgetown Business Park 2. Variance- Reinstatement of Final Plat - Sunnyside 3. Variance- Reinstatement of Final Plat - Karsten Addition 4. Variance- Reinstatement of Final Plat - River Ridge Section Three A 5. University Park Section One- Partial Vacation and Resubdivision Plat 6. Dennis P McCoy - Final Plat 7. Mickler Park - Final Plat B) River Hills Section Four - Final Plat C) Quail Meadow VI - Revised Final Plat D) Parkview Place PUD - Site Plan E) Ordinance: Rezoning- All of Lots 5 & 6 and the west part of Lots 7 & 8, Block 9, City Addition - 1st Reading F) Ordinance: Rezoning- River Ridge Section 2A Lots 18-19 from RS to C-1 - 2nd Reading G) Variance- Building Line- 614 Meadowbrook Dr H) Variance- Building Line- 807 College Street I) Variance- Building Line- 140 Ridgecrest J) Variance- Building Line- 1257 S. Main Street K) Ordinance: Amendment to the "Historice Preservation" section of City Zoning Ordinance - 1st Reading L) Resolution: Adopting Development Plan for City of Georgetown M) Recosmendation of Northwest C.B.D. plan N) Planning Report J l LOCATION MAP FOR PLATS REQUESTING REINSTATEMENT. MARCH 11, 1986 City of Georgetown, Texas m umn.m Jim Christy & Associates 15300 FM 1825 Roui January 20, 1986 Mr. Randall Gaither Planning Department City of Georgetown P.O. Box 409 Georgetown, TX 78627 RE: South Georgetown Business Park Williamson County, Texas Dear Mr. Gaither: Rock, Texas 78664 5121251.5102 The Final Plat and.Site Plan were approved by the City Council on August 13, 1985. on February 13,1986, the six month period in which the Final Plat is to be recorded will have expired. A three month extension isrequested. This should be ample time to secure approval o the Site Plan and recordation of the Final Plat. Upon your approval of this request, please pla a this item on the next City Council agenda for their appr,val. Should you have any questions or need additional information, please advise. Sincerely, jam6s D. Christy, P.E. Q,4 d i 1-3) REINSTATEMENTS Request: A variance as required by Section 4.03 Part 8 of the subdivision ordinance providing an extension of the final plat approval for the following subdivisions: 1) South Georgetown Business Park expired 2/13/86 2) Karsten Addition expired 2/13/86 3) Sunny Side expired 1/9/86 See copies of request letter attached) Analysis: All of the above subdivisions are in the E.T.J. and. have requested no City Utilities. South Georgetown Business Park is a 15 acre commercial tract located just south of McCoys Building Supplies on IH=35. Karsten Addition is a two lot commercial plat located across Hwy 81 from Georgetown High School. Sunny Side subdivision consists of three one acre single family lots located north off County Road 151. Staff Recommendation: Granting of the variances as requested for extension of plat approval,subject to the of original plat approval. New expiration plats shall be June 11, 1986. City Council Action: (5-0) a three month conditions date for all Approved granting of variances as recommended by staff above by consent. XU ST I N CONSULTING ENGINEERS 3 March 1986 City of Georgetown P. O. Box 409 Georgetown, Texas 78626 ATTN: Ed Berry - Director of Planning Re: River Ridge, Section 3A Plat Extension of Time Dear Mr. Berry: We hereby request a 3 month extension for River Ridge 3A Plat recordation. We are in the process of trying to reconcile the sewer in Sections 3B and 3C with the Public Works Department, along with changes in the Restrictions for Sections 3A, 3B and 3C. GD/sjh Sincerely, C%u Tdc Gary Dayton 9111 Jollyville Road • Suite 200 • Austin, Texas 78759 • (512) 346-1333 4) VARIANCE -FINAL PLAT REINSTATEMENT -RIVER RIDGE THREE A see location map preceding) Request: A variance as required by Section 4.03 Part 8 of the Subdivision ordinance providing an extension of the final plat approval for River Ridge Section Three A subdivision. (see copy of request letter attached) Analysis: This subdivision was annexed into the City in December, 1985 and is to be served by City utilities. The 16 acre project consists of 32 single family lots and 64 multi- family units. Staff Recommendation: Granting of the variance as requested for a three month extension of plat approval subject to the conditions of original plat approval. New expiration date for this plat shall be June 11, 1986. City Council Action: (5-0) Approved granting of variance as recommended by staff above by consent. 5) UNIVERSITY PARK SECTION ONE- PARTIAL VACATION AND RESUBDIVISION PLAT 4; Location Map r Bt ack "C • A 7---5 :2, / -22 i NoRT,N 1"= 300' Applicant: JSJ Joint Venture 3415 Greystone, Suite 304 Austip,Tx 78731 345 541 3 Agent: Planned Development Concepts (Jeff Eastman) 3415 Greystone, Suite 3D4 Austin, Tx 787-1 345 5486 Request: Approval of the partial vacation and resubdivision plat of Lots 23 & 24, Block "A" and Lots 1,2,16,17,19,20, & 22, Block "C" of University Park Section One, subdivision as recorded in Cabinet G, Slides 162-166 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas. University Park -partial vacation & resubdivision -page 2 Facts: Location: Just east of the proposed Southwestern Blvd. Between E 16th Street and E. 18th Street. Surrounding Use: Smith Branch Floodway and Park lies to the east of Block "C". Single family lots of University Park surround the remainder. Existing single family homes lie adjacent to the west of Block A". History: Original plat was recorded August 5, 1985. Analysis: Resubdivision consists of minor shifts in the lot lines of the requested lots in order to accommodate proposed house plans. All lots :meet ordinance requirements. Staff Recommendation: Approval of plat subject where applicable to the same conditions under which the original plat was approved. P & Z Recommendation: (4-0) approval as recommended by staff above. City Council Action: (5-0) Approved as recommended by P & Z above by consent. 6) Dennis P McCoy Subdivision- Final Plat Location Map LOCATION MAP _ Scale I°=2000' 1"=2000' Applicant: McCoy Realty Corporation IH -35 North PO Box 1028 San Marcos, Tx 78667 Agent: Steger & Bizzell, Inc. PO Box 858 Georgetown Tx 78626 86'.-4521 Request: Final plat approval for Dennis P McCoy Subdivision, a 12.89 acre subdivision situated in the Francis A Hudson Survey, A-295. A Variance for a decrease in the maximum center line radius from 800' to 500' on Fox Drive is requested. F0 i' Location Map LOCATION MAP _ Scale I°=2000' 1"=2000' Applicant: McCoy Realty Corporation IH -35 North PO Box 1028 San Marcos, Tx 78667 Agent: Steger & Bizzell, Inc. PO Box 858 Georgetown Tx 78626 86'.-4521 Request: Final plat approval for Dennis P McCoy Subdivision, a 12.89 acre subdivision situated in the Francis A Hudson Survey, A-295. A Variance for a decrease in the maximum center line radius from 800' to 500' on Fox Drive is requested. Dennis P McCoy -page 2 Facts: Location: Adjacent to the east side of IH -35 frontage road, south of its intersection with County Road 116 and includes the existing McCoys Building Supply Center (Lot 1). The property is outside but contiguous to existing City Limits and within Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone. Surrounding Uses: To the south, this tract is bordered by the proposed South Georgetown Business Park, which includes Mini -Warehouse units; Commercial property lines to the north and undeveloped to the east. Proposed Use: Seven commercial lots of one acre or more. Development Plan: History: District 8c. This area is not specified on the plan but the proposal is consistent with surrounding uses. A revised preliminary was submitted November 5, 1985 and approved by City Council with a substantial improvement having been accomplished in the street layout. A fire protection plan was required as a condition of approval, but was not submitted. Utilities: Private wells, septic systems and TP & L electric. Analysis: Land Use- The proximity to IH -35 and similar uses of surrounding properties support the proposed commercial designation for this tract. Its location on this primary entranceway to Georgetown presents a serious challenge to promoting an attractive image to the City in an area which is not being served by City utilities. Without the controls which accompany the permitting process for City utility service and lacking the enforcement powers of the City Zoning Ordinance governing annexed areas, measures to enhance the aesthetics of this corridor (such as landscaping, sign controls and building code requirements, can be enforced only through voluntary compliance of the developer and coordination with the County Health Department. The major thing to avoid along this strip is the proliferation of small scaled, unplanned retail uses which tend to increase the number of signs, driveways, architectural styles, and general clutter. Though most of these lots would not access directly onto the IH -35 frontage road, they would be visible and Dennis P McCoy - page 3 thus a reflection of community image. Streets- The revised street layout evidenced in this final plat is workable, providing access to the as yet undeveloped property to the east. The variancetoallowareductionfrom800' to 500' of the centerline radius of Fox Drive was approved with the revised preliminary plat. The encouragement of common drivewaysbetweenlots ,at site plan level would help to prevent undue congestion along what will probably become animportantconnectiontoCountyRoad116totheeast. Utilities- As long as this tract remains unservicablebytheCityforitswaterandsewerneeds, a keyissuewillcontinuetobetheproblemofprovidingadequatefireprotection. This problem is especiallyaggravatedbythecloseproximityofalreadyexistingLumbersupplyCompany (McCoy's) on Lot 1 of Block Btotheotherlots. The proposed location of the SouthGeorgetownBusinessParkwellwithits150' Radius sanitary easement conflicts with drainage easements on their shared property line. Some resolution betweenthesedevelopersmustbereachedpriortorecordation. Drainage- The City Engineer has conceded that individualdetentionprovidedateachlotmaybeanadequateapproachtothehandlingofstormwaterrunoff, though a regionalsolutionwaspreferable. The interrelationshipsofdrainagebetweentheproposedSouthGeorgetownBusinessParktothesouthandthelotsofBlock B; the runoff from Lots in Block A to surrounding area; and the additional increase in runoff caused by thesectionofFoxDriveabuttingeachlotmustallreceivemoredetailedtreatment. The location of PUE's within drainage easements is discouraged bythePublicWorksDivisionifstormsewersarenotused. These issues must be resolved during constructionplanreview. Summary- Every attempt should be made to encouragethehighestpossiblestandardsofdevelopmentintermsofarchitecturalcharacterandsiteattractivenessforthesepropertiesthataresovisiblealongtheGatewaytoGeorgetown." A landscape plan should besubmittedinconjunctionwiththesiteplanswhichwillberequiredforeachindividuallotpriortoissuanceofconstructionpermits. The subject property is contiguous with the City limits, however due to an inability to provide City utilityservice, annexation is not recommended at this time. At such time as City water and sewer service are available to this site, all service lines and appurtenancesincludingfireprotection, will be extended at the owners expense. A plan for fire protection should be submitted and drainage system design must receive Dennis P McCoy - page 4 more complete treatement during construction plan review. Planning Staff Recommendation: Fianl plat approval with the following conditions: 1. All ordinance requirements shall be met 2. All drainage requirements shall be met; A drainage facilities maintenance covenant shall be required prior to recordation. 3. Utilities being adequate- Water availability note shall apply 4. A landscape plan shall be submitted in conjunction with subdivision construction plans for designated drainage and landscape easements 5. A water pollution. abatement plan shall be approved by T.W.C.' P&Z Recommendation: (4-0) approval with the conditions above being met. City Council Action: (5-0) Approved as recommended by P & Z above by consent. 7) MICKLER PARK- FINAL PLAT Location Map 1"=400' Applicant: G. Brian Christie PO Box 86 3 Georgetown Tx 78627 86 3-756 3 Agent: Gilbreath, MCDill, & Associates 115 E 7th Georgetown Tx 78626 863-9862 Request: Final plat approval for Mickler Park an 18.83 acre tract in the William Addison Survey, Abstract No. 21. A variance to the 5' PUE requirement for side lot lines for the single family units has been requested. Facts: Location: West of Hutto Rd. and just north of Quail Valley Subdivision. Outside, but contiguous to City Limits. Surrounding Use: Normal single-family residential existing and proposed) and undeveloped. Mickler Park -page 2 Proposed Use: Mixed density residential -One 5.9 acre multi -family lot and 24 single family lots with an overall density of 7.4 d.u./acre. Development Plan: District 7a. Normal residential, schools and parks. Proposal does not strictly conform to plan. Analysis: Land Use- The proposed gross density for this mixed use tract (7.43 dwelling units per acre) exceeds the Master Plan recommendation of four units per acre. While the single family lots are compatible with the adjacent Quail Valley residences, the proposed multi -family lot along the flood plain requires the closer scrutiny afforded by the PUD process. The applicant has requested deferal of the site development plan approval of the PUD until an end user for that site is determined. Streets- The applicant has failed to address the staff's concerns about the traffic impact on Hutto Rd. that will be generated by this development. One condition of preliminary plat approval states that "street improvements to Hutto Rd should be required with this development." The extent of these improvements should be at minimum, the resurfacing of the road from 19th St. to Quail Valley Drive. Utilities- A conceptual utility plan was revised and resubmitted, but provision for the relocation of TP & L) electrical lines still has not been indicated. The following off-site considerations need to be addressed in order to provide adequate utilities to this tract: a) Improvements to water storage facilities for the area b) Downstream sewer improvements will be required c) Water distribution system improvements. (The Water availability note shall be required). Drainage- A flood plain study was performed in response to concerns raised by a neighborhood association. Conditional approval to the channel improvements has been recommended by the City engineers. As evidenced by other channel work along Smith Branch, reveg.btation is essential to minimize both erosion problems and negative aesthetic impacts. A revegitation plan should be included with the subdivision construction plans because the landscape plan has been defered with the site plan for the PUD lot. All floodplain work must be coordinated with the County Health Official and T.W.C. and a letter of Local Map Amendment from the Federal Emergency Management Agency appears to be required. Mickler Park - page 3 Miscellaneous -The request for a variance to side yard easement requirements can not be evaluated without detailed electrical plans. The staff has no problems with waiving easements after Public Works has reviewed construction plans to determine their necessity. Planning Staff Recommendation: Approval of the Final plat of Mickler Park conditioned upon: 1. Ordinance requirements being met. . Qequiremehts of the PUD Ordinance shall apply to the multi -family lot. 2. Utilities being adequate: a) The Water Availability note shall apply b) All off-site utility improvements shall be indicated in the construction plans. The applicants participation in the following improvements must be approved prior to recordation: 1. Improvements to water storage facilities for the area 2. Downstream sewer improvements 3. Water distribution system improvements c) Variances to side PUE requirements shall be granted except for those easements required to serve the subdivision as determined during the construction plan review. d) The proposed relocation of the TP & L line and the dedication of appropriate easements shall be resolved prior to recordation 3. Drainage requirements being met. a) The City engineer's review comments must be addressed prior to recordation b) Detailed plans for the revegitation of the floodplain .as required by construction standards, shall be included in the construction plans. 4. An approved Water Pollution Abatement Plan is required by the T.W.C. 5. A.Drainage Facility Maintenance Covenant shall be required. 6. Improvements to Hutto Road should be required with this development. P & Z Recommendation: (3-1) Approval with conditions as listed above, except that condition #6 is amended to read "Improvements to Hutto Rd. shall be required with the development only in the area around its intersection with Gretchen Parkway." City Council Action: (5-0) Approved as recommended by P & Z above by consent. B) River Hills - Section Four - Final Plat 4 N Location Map Applicant: Walter R. Carrington 5609 Adams Ave Austin, Tx 787 31 Agent: Mudd & Associates, Inc. 1507 S IH- 35 Austin, Tx 78741 442-6702 1"= 2000' Request: Final Plat approval for River Hills, Section Four, a 19.84 acre subdivision situated in the J.B. Pulsifer Survey No. 36, part of a 102.62 acre tract recorded in Volume 711, page 489, Williamson County Deed Records. Facts: Location: Adjacent and along the west side of IH -35 approximately 3500 feet north of Hwy 29. Outside of, but contiguous to the City limits and within the Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone. River Hills Section Four - Final Plat - page 2 Surrounding Uses: Georgetown Multi -Use Development Rivery) is proposed for land to north. Area to west is existing large lot single family. Office use is across the street to the south. Proposed Uses: Plat indicates R & D, Office, and Multi -family use. Development Plan: Area is designated for large single family residential, thus the proposed use does not conform to the master plan, but Council approval of IH -35 utility agreement implies flexibility in this area. History: Site is part of the IH -35 Joint Venture Utility Agreement. This site was also originally included in the Overall Plan for River Hills Subdivision as a large lot single family & commercial use. This portion of the overall plan was however, not recorded. Currently, there is pending legal action relative to the allowed use of this property between the current owner and adjacent residential property owners. The City Attorney has advised staff to "proceed in a normal fashion" with the project. The revised Concept Plan for this area was recommended for approval with conditions by the Planning and Zoning Commission on October 1, 1985. The Preliminary Plat for Section Four yeas disapproved by P & Z, November 5, but was approved by City Council on November 26, 1985 with the following conditions of approval: All ordinance requirements being met, All provisions of the Agreement Reqardin Water and Wastewater Facilities and Services shall be met, anu capacity Deing avail 3. A good faith effort shall comply with environmental Regarding Water and Wast services, Access along IH -35 shall T.D.H.P.T. plans, The following conditions 4,5, & 6 (section 4): able, be made by applicant to provisions of Agreement ewater Facilities and be coordinated with shall apply to parcels A) The 50 ft. greenbelt shall remain in its existing natural condition, B) The 25 ft, strip adjacent and parallel to this greenbelt shall be used for landscaping, parking and driveways only. Construction in the west half of this area shall reasonably avoid the destruction of existing trees, River Hills - page 3 Specific land use shall be indicated on final plat/plans. Analysis: The conditions of approval as established by Council for the Preliminary plat have been adequately addressed except for the specific designation of land use. The current uses listed range from R & D to multi -family residential. Thus, complete evaluation of that develop- ment of the tract is dependent upon the submission of a Detailed Development Plan in conformance with the procedural provisions of the PUD Ordinance and the Agreement Regarding_ Water and Wastewater Facilities ana Services. In accordz and with due regard to ti environmentally sensitiv Georgetown planning area, need to be given special nce with this latter Agreeme is tract's location in an e" area at the center of the the following areas will consideration: I. The visual image created by this multi -use develop- ment should be designed to enhance the overall attractiveness of the community as it lies along the City's primary exposure corridor. Therefore, height restrictions, buffering to shield unsightly parking and architectural review of proposed buildings and appurtenances should be a part of the approval process to insure that the City's presentation will be a handsome one. The preservation of the natural beauty as well as the prevention of any detrimental impact on either over -ground or underground water resources will require what has been expressed as "a good faith effort" (see condition of approval -City Council Planning Report November 26, 1985) to comply with environmental provisions of Agreement Regarding Water and Wastewater Facilities and Sr rv,rPc_ The density and impervious coverage created on this site should be evaluated according to the PUD Ordinance through site plan review with parking, drainage, landscaping, and buffering being several areas under its purview. Miscellaneous - Due to the fact that this property is outside the City limits and therefore outside of the authority of the zoning and many other Ordinances, annexation is strongly recommended by the staff. Annexation would enable the City to exercise greater authority to ensure high quality attractive, and environmentally sound development along the IH -35 corridor in order to promote the overall image of the City. The owner should submit a letter requesting annexation. u titiiiV--7-... .: .iii . River Hills - page 4 Staff Recommendation: Approval with the following conditions: 1. All ordinance requirements shall be met, 2. Drainage requirements shall be met, 3. A Water Pollution Abatement Plan shall be approved by T.W.C. 4. All provisions of the Agreement Regarding Water and Wastewater Facilities and Services shall be met, and capacity being available, 5. A good faith effort shall be made by applicant to comply with environmental provisions of Agreement Regarding Water and Wastewater Facilities and Services, 6. Access along IH -35 shall be coordinated with T.D.H.P.T. plans, 7. The following conditions shall apply to parcels 4, 5, & 6 (section 4): A. The 50 ft. greenbelt shall remain in its existing natural condition, B. The 25 ft. strip adjacent and parallel to this greenbelt shall be used for landscaping, parking and driveways only. Construction in this area shall reasonably avoid the destruction of existing trees, 8. Specific land use by type and location shall be indicated on final plat, 9. Applicant shall coordinate with adjacent.developments toward the elimination of the lift station shown or. Utility Plan, 10. Stormwater detention/filtration areas shall be shown on plat as determined by construction plans, 11. A Drainage Facility Maintenance covenant shall be recorded with the plat. P & Z Recommendation: February 4, 1986 3-2) Disapproval of plat due to failure to comply with previous condition of approval listed as number 8 above. NOTE: Applicant requested that plat be sent on to Council. Subsequent Action*** Motion to reconsider the previous action was passed by unanimous vote. Motion to have plat'tabl.ed till next meeting to give City Attorney time to work on conditions was unanimously approved after applicant agreed that this was acceptable to him. Subseauent Hearing:-- MARCH 4, 1986 P&Z Recommendation: (4-0) approval with conditions as recommended by staff above. City Council Action: (5-0) approval as recommended by P & Z above with the amendment that condition #10 be omitted. C) QUAIL MEADOW, UNIT VI -REVISED FINAL PLAT Location Map 1"=2000' Applicant: D.H. Parker Builders, 3100 Williams Dr Georgetown, Tx 78628 512 863 4561 Agent: Steger 6 Bizzell, Inc. PO Box 858 Geogetown, Tx 78627 512 863-4561 Request: Approval of revised final plat of Quail Meadow Unit VI, being a 14.42 acres of land situated in the Nicholas Porter Survey, Abstract No. 497 and J.B. Pulsifer Survey Abstract No. 498. Variances from stormwater detention requirements and the 800 ft. minimum centerline radius requirements have been requested. Facts: Location: Northwest of Quail Meadow IV and east of River Bend Subdivision, 1500 ft, southwest of Williams Drive. Is outside but contiguous to City limits and in the Recharge Zone. Surrounding Uses: Primarily single-family on medium size lots and undeveloped land. Duplex residential along Kimberly St. north of subdivision. r_ Quail Meadow Unit VI -page 2 Proposed Uses: A residential development of 154 dwelling units including 28 fourplexes and 21 duplexes. Overall density is 10.68 dwelling units/acre. Development Plan: Large lot residential use is District 4a recommended; the proposed use is not in conformance with the plan but conforms to approved preliminary plat. Utilities: City of Georgetown underground electric, water and wastewater services have been requested. History: The preliminary plat for Quail Meadow VI was conditionally approved by Planning and Zoning Commission on April 2, 1985, and by City Council on April 9. These conditions of approval are: 1. Plat meeting all ordinance requirements 2. Drainage requirements being met 3. Utilities being adequate 4. Remedial drainage improvements for existing problems in surrounding areas shall be completed prior to issuance of building permits in this subdivision. 5. All drainage easements required for #4 above to be recorded prior to this plat. 6. Kathy Lane and its connections with Apache Trail and Parker Lane shall be included in this subdivision. 7. No building permits shall be issued until the new City Water Treatment Plant is operational. 8. Off-site improvements to sanitary sewer facilities are required to serve this project. 9. Variances are granted for Block A lots 6 & 7 to exceed the maximum length to width ratio; Block A lots 8-10 variance for right angle lots. 10. Deferral of variance for stormwater detention requirements to staff in conjunction with construction plan review. The final plat was disapproved by P&Z on November 5, 1985 due to failure to satisfy preliminary conditions of approval. Analysis: The following is an assessment of the current status of the previous conditions of approval: Conditions 1 through 3 - are standard -no specific response needed except as they relate to comments below. Conditions 4 & 5 - Specifically these improvements include: 1. All improvements shown on a plan dated Nov. 1984 and titled "Drainage Map Quail Meadow/River Bend" including all street and drainage improvements Quail Meadow Unit VI -page 3 shown within both Quail Meadow Unit VI and RiverBendUnitIII 2. The earth cut channel from Tiffany Lane to Addie Ln. must be improved and connected to the improvements indicated in #1 above 3. Drainage Easements and required improvements must be completed across Lots 4c & 5 of River Bend Univ IV to accommodate the outfall discharge from #1 above. 4. Parker Lane shall be reconstructed so that no stormwater run-off reaching its intersection with Kimberly Dr. shall flow east toward River Bend Dr. 5. A combination berm and/or swale shall be constructed so that sheet flow from the unplatted portion of Quail Meadow does not cross lots in Quail Meadow Unit V nor enter onto Mesquite Lane but is delivered along the west edge of the Parco Lumber tract to the culvert at Williams Dr. 6. The run-off delivered to Gabriel View Dr by JohnThomasDr. must be provided with an adequate outfall easement and conduit. 7. Also outfall easements and conduits are needed between lots 15 and 16 as well as lots 20 and 21 of River Bend Unit IV. All of the above items should be on construction plans and/or completed prior to the recording oftheplat. Condition #6 - Has been satisfied. A variance has beenrequestedtoallow366' and 624' radii on Kathi Lane.. Staff has no objections to these variances. the drainage for this street rust be addresseHowever, d bytheconstructionplans. Condition #7 -no response required, water availabilitynotehasbeenplacedonplat. Condition #8 -Utility construction plans must show required sewer line improvements downstream of this development to the Big Country Lift Station. Applicants participation in required improvements to this lift station must be determined. Condition #9 -Variances granted still applyCondition #10 -To be considered during construction plan review, no response required except in conjunction with Condition 4 & 5 above. While all the conditions of preliminary plat have not been totally satisfied. Remaining problems can be resolved in the construction plans or through minor revisions to the final plat support documents. The applicant should also submit for recordation a drainage easement for off-site detention facility area(s). This Quail Meadow Unit VI -page 4 instrument could be voided when the detention area is platted. In addition to the previously discussed drainage and utility problems, the existing road network will be impacted by the intense land use proposed. It is recommended that a T.I.A. be submitted with the revised concept plans for the whole of the Quail Meadow development. The absence of recreational facilities or open space throughout this and adjacent subdivisions is of concern. Future sections of Quail Meadow should designate areas for recreational open space. Since this subdivision is contiguous to the existing City Limits and has requested all City utilities, staff recommends the area for voluntary annexation in 1987. Staff Recommendation: Approval of the final plat of Quail Meadow Unit VI conditioned upon: 1. Ordinance requirements being met 2. A Water Pollution Abatement Plan being approved by T.W.C. 3. Drainage requirements being met; the subdivision construction plans shall include the following improvements which shall be completed prior to acceptance of subdivision work: a) All improvements shown on a plan dated Nov. 1984 and titled "Drainage Map Quail Meadow/River Bend" including all street and drainage improvements shown within both Quail Meadow Unit VI and River Bend Unit III. b) The earth cut channel from Tiffany Lane to Addie Lane must be improved and connected to the improvements indicated in #p above. C) Drainage Easements and required improvements must be completed across Lots 4c and 5 of River Bend Unit IV to accommodate the outfall discharge from "a" above. d) Parker Lane shall be reconstructed so that no stormwater run-off reaching its intersection with Kimberly Dr. shall flow east toward River Bend Dr. e) A combination berm and/or swale shall be constructed so that sheet flow from the unplatted portion of Quail Meadow does not cross lots in Quail Meadow Univ V nor enter onto Mesquite Lane but is delivered along the west edge of the Parco Lumber tract to the culvert at Williams Dr. A drainage easement may be required. Quail Meadow Unit VI- page 5 4. Utilities being adequate: a) The water availability note shall apply and b) All off-site water and wastewater improvements shall be indicated on the subdivision construction plans. 5. Previously granted variances shall still apply for: a) Block A lots 6 & 7 to exceed the maximum length to width ratio b) Block A lots 8-10 for right angle lots 6. The variance to the requirement for minimum 800' centerline radii on secondary collectors shall be granted for the 366' and 624' curves on Kathi Lane. 7. Applicant is hereby notified of the following: a) The applicant's participation in the improvement of sewer lines from Big Country Club Lift station and the lift station itself must be approved by Public Works Division prior to plat recordation. b) The variance from stormwater detention requirements shall be granted subject to staff verification that subdivision construction plans have satisfied per condition number three above. P&Z Recommendation: (4-0) Approval with conditions as recommended by staff above. City Council Action: (5-0) Approved as recommended by P & Z above with the amendment that the following condition be added: 8.) All delinquent engineering review fees shall be paid prior to recordation of plat. D) Parkview Place PUD -Revised site plan Location Map Owner: Parkview Estates Joint Venture Dennis 0. Freeman 5950 Balcones #207 Austin, Tx 78731 459-0746 Applicant: Turley Associates 301 N. 3rd Street Temple, Tx 869-7961 Request: 1"=2000' Revised site development plan approval for Parkview Place, a 10.35 acre Planned Unit Development situated in the Antonio Flores Survey, Abstract No. 235, Volume 1123 Page 300 and platted as Parkview Estates Section Two PUD, recorded in Cabinet G Slide 42-43. Variances are requested for parking, density, and impervious cover. Facts: Location: Adjacent to (on the east side) HWY 81, immediately south of the Georgetown High School. The tract is within the City limits, and the Edwards Aquifer Recharge zone. Parkview Place PUD -page 2 Surrounding Uses: The Georgetown High School bounds this tract to the north. Within Parkview Estates, Section 3 to the southwest is platted for commercial use and Section 1 to the southeast is platted for single family residential. Existing Zoning: RP -Residential Planned Development District. Proposed Use: 214 Multi -family residential units at a density of 20.7 units/acre. Development Plan: District 5c. Residential use is recommended. The proposed use substantially conforms to the plan and existing zoning. Utilities: City of Georgetown underground utilities are proposed. History: City Council approved the final plat of Parkview Estates S39ction 2 on 12/11/84. Plat was recorded May 20, 1985. Site plan approval is required as part of the PUD process. On January 7, 1986 the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that the developer work out parking density and impervious coverage details prior to resubmission to the Commissions. Analysis: Density- The applicant is requesting a variance to the density limitations (20 dwelling units per acre) of the RP District regulations. The applicant has proposed a density of 20.7 units per acre which equates to 7 units more than allowed by ordinance. The applicant has also requested that the water availability policy be waived on the additional units to allow completion of the entire project in the event that this variance is granted. Due to the amenity package which includes open space, a sports court, and a clubhouse with an indoor pool, the additional seven units will probably not significantly impact the livability of the site or the adjacent area. However, it could set a precedent for future requests. Therefore, any decision to grant this request should be justified by compensating benefits to the project and/or its surrounding area. Utilities- The major issue regarding density is the waiver to the water availability policy. The City has applied the policy to all newly created lots resulting from subdivision or resubdivision, as well as any increase in demand over that which was approved Parkview Place PUD-page3 prior to the establishment of the policy. Thus, the water availability policy should apply because the seven additional units if allowed as proposed on the site plan would create demands on the system greater than those approved with the subdivision plat. To ensure consistent and equitable application of the policy, building permits for the additional units if density variance is granted) should not be issued until the water treatment plant is operational. Waiving the policy would set a precedent that would be difficult to ignore in the future. The proposed utility layout has been determined to be inadequate for fire protection. The applicant is working with staff to correct this problem. Parking- The applicant has requested variances to reduce both the number of spaces required, and the size of those spaces. The first variance request proposes 1.5 spaces for each one bedroom unit as opposed to the 2 spaces required by the PUD ordinance. This reduction would match the requirements for multi- family units in the RM District; and, when combined with deed restrictions prohibiting the on-site parking of boats, trailers, and recreational vehicles, is acceptable to staff. The enforcement of these restrictions will depend upon the future residents. The requested variance from size requirements involves a reduction of the stall depth from 20 ft. to 18 ft. and the width from 9 ft. to 8.5 ft. Width is discussed below. Staff has no objection to depth reduction as long as continuous curbing is used as a wheel stop and overhand area is provided. Impervious Cover- A Variance to reduce the width of the parking spaces by six inches is requested so that the percentage of impervious coverage can be maintained while increasing the number of spaces. The 43.2% impervious coverage indicated on the site plan allows room for the required 9 foot parking spaces. While the reduction of the width to 8.5 ft. would allow a reduction in impervious coverage, the increased friction between neighbors due to nicked and dented car doors would off -set the benefits of the added pervious surface. Single family lots are adjacent to this tract on the south and east sides. The design of a landscaped berm in conjunction with the proposed privacy fence would create improved drainage and buffering but must be co-ordinated with any utilities proposed for the 20 ft. PUE and drainage easement. Trees should not be planted in the easement along this fence unless the applicant can demonstrate that the easement will not be needed for utilities and will not interfere with drainange. Parkview Place PUD - page 4 The proposal is bounded by the High School to the north. For the protection of both students and residents a barrier is desireable. The plan indicates that a fence approved by the City will be erected. GISD has expressed a preference for a 6" chain link fence which should be augmented with generous landscaping features. Planning Staff Recommendation: I. VARIANCES 1. A variance to parking requirements shall be granted the depth of space to be reduced from 20 ft. to 18 ft as long as each space is bordered by a curb and 2 ft of overhang area is provided from back of curb. 2. A variance to the parking requirements shall be granted allowing 1.5 spaces for each single bedroom unit conditioned upon the revision of deed restrictions to prohibit the parking of trailers, boats, and recreational vehicles on site. 3. A variance shall be granted to allow up to 448 impervious coverage. 4. A variance to increase the density requirement by seven units shall be denied.as it exceeds that allowable by Ordinance. 5. A variance to increase the allocation of water and wastewater service shall be denied. II. Approval of the revised site development plan for Parkview Place PUD conditioned upon: 1. Ordinance requirements being met 2. Drainage requirements shall be met as indicated on a schematic grading plan which shall coordinate construction plans approved for Parkview Estates subdivision 3. Utilities being adequate 4. Utility plan shall be revised to meet the requirements of the Fire Chief and Public Works. 5. Proposed utility connections including electrical, telephone, cable TV, fire protection, water, and sewer shall be clearly indicated on the construction and site development plans to coordinate with drainage design and landscaping features. 6. A landscaping plan conforming to ordinance requirments shall be submitted with the construction and site development plans. Plantings within ten feet of PUE's and/or drainage easements be approved by the Division of Public Works. Parkview Place PUD - page 5 P&Z Recommendation: (4-0) Approval with conditions as recommended by staff above. City Council Action: (5-0) Approval as recommended by P & Z above with the amendment that items I.4. & II.'3. shall be amended to read: I.4. The variance to increase the density requirement by seven units shall be granted due to the extra -ordinary amenities provided. II.3. Utilities being adequate: Water and Wastewater service to the seven units allowed by I.4. above shall not be provided until the water treatment facilities are operational. E) ZONING CHANGE -PART OF BLOCK 9 REVISED CITY OF GEORGETOWN MAP. 215 West 3rd Street. Location Map Applicant: Craig M Brown 215 West 3rd Georgetown Tx 78626 863-9808 Agent: David L Voelter 1309 College Georgetown Tx 78626 86 39255 Request: 1"=400' Change in zoning from RS Residential Single family District to C-1 Local Commercial District for lots 5,6, and the west parts of lots 7 and 8, Block 9, revised City of Georgetown Map, located at 215 West 3rd. Zoning Change -Part of Blk 9 -page 2 Facts: Location: The west half of the block between 2nd, 3rd and Rock streets on the west side of Austin Avenue. Surrounding uses: Vacant land is to the west and north. Single family homes are located both east and south of the property Surrounding Zoning: C-1 District for Lots 1&21I & west part of Existing use: one vacant ing rfa i y'-hme Sego ale 1) on the southern portion of the tract. Proposed Use: Professional office. Development Plan: Lies in Plan District 2 and also within the Northwest C.B.D. Planning Area. The proposed zoning conforms to this plan but the proposed use does not strictly conform. Analysis: The proposed zoning change must be evaluated in terms of compatibility with both the existing land uses, and the Northwest C.B.D. Plan. Northwest C.B.D. Plan Summary- Because the area between MLK and Austin Avenue from 10th Street to the river has become an area of transition, a land use plan has been proposed to guide the development of the area. The primary aim of this plan is to create a vital focal point and long term asset to the community. Figure 2 and the following paragraph summarize the results of the in depth analysis that examined drainage basins, slopes, utility systems, housing conditions and street conditions. The most significant feature in the area is an undeveloped drainageway that extends from Blue Hole to 7th Street. Development along this feature will be strongly encouraged to include an attractive pedestrian path that takes advantage of both the water and existing heavy foliage to provide relief from the surrounding automobile oriented environment. The construction of the County Judicial Annex will promote the development of professional offices in the area. The provision of a functional and attractive pedestrian connection between the Courthouse square and the annex in conjunction with the sesquicential sidewalk improvements will both enhance the small town atmosphere of Georgetown and reduce the unnecessary use of vehicles downtown. 9 0 NFNQQ w U Z r axz 0 0 z N a O Ga CI N 5 aye rLo ca Retai I co"t A A act j. LOCAL RCT4 1 0 79,E h c sai<s i 7 I I aa k T ITE HOUSE 1JeRruwE% liftLAP4U Zoning Change -Part of Blk 9 - page 3 The subject tract is recommended for retail use in the Northwest C.B.D. land use plan. In the long run, this site could best be used to serve both those working in the offices located along the proposed pedestrian corridor and those utilizing Blue Hole and Imhoff Lake if compatible retail uses such as food service and specialty shops are established. Recognizing the present lack of demand for retail activity in the area the applicant should design the proposed professional offices to accomodate retail uses which would serve the anticipated population as the various elements of the plan, including the Judicial Annex and "Pedway" are completed. A zoning change under the present ordinance will not necessarily lead to the desired redevelopment. An unconditional rezoning to C-1 would enable the applicant to pursue a wide range of options. Of the thirteen primary uses allowable under the C-1 District regulations, only one use actually fulfillstheintentofthePlan. That use is the "sale of goods and products at retail" with limitations. Even this use needs to be narrowed further to insure the creation of the specific retail activity impliedinthePlan. Two other uses may be accommodated with minor changes to the plan. The first of these is commercial parking lots. If this property weredevelopedtoprovideparking, then this function maybeshiftedoffoftheblocktothenorthof2nd Street as shown on the plan. However, City owned public parking for the Blue Hole area may be preferable. The second use. is that of office buildings as requested by applicant. The impact of allowing office use as opposed to appropriate retail use is that some other site must be found for the retail function. In order to both accommodate zoning changes, and control specific land use, the City has in the past accepted an applicants request to further limit allowable uses. Ideally, rezonings in this area should be accompanied by the requirement of a site plan approved through the public hearing process with the zoning change made conditional upon such plan. By requiring a public hearing for site plans in the Northwest C.B.D., the P & Z Commission and City Council can ensure that: a) redevelopment will reflect sensitivity to the neighborhood in transition b) compatibility with the Northwest C.B.D. Land Use Plan is achieved. Existing Adjacent Uses- The primary concern for the smooth transition of the neighborhood is the compatibility of the project with the existing surrounding uses. Rezoning -Part of Blk 9 - page 4 The housing stock surrounding the site is in fair to poor condition. While several of the houses are residences, the average building condition is indicative of the need for redevelopment of this block. To reduce conflicts in land use during the transition, the developer of the more intensive proposed use should employ buffering techniques to protect neighboring residences. Planning Staff Recommendation: Approval of zoning change from RS to C-1 conditional upon applicant's voluntary acceptance of the following conditions: Use for site shall be restricted to retail sale of goods and services which serve the local area as projected by the Northwest C.B.D. Plan, commercial parking lot, and professional office use. P&Z Recommendation: (4-0) approval subject to above conditions City COURT it Action: (5-0) Approval as recommended by P & Z above. ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE "ZONING ORDINANE" PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, ON THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1968, AMENDING A PART OF THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF THE ORIGINALRDINANCE: TO CHANGE THE PROPERTY OF 215 West 3rd Street IN THE (! lt.yA d ri i t inn SURVEY ABSTRACT NO. IN THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, FROMR-R RaGiden ial finaleFamilyDISTRICTTO( ? f,nnal ( n_m_marri a_l' DISTRICT AS HEREINAFTER SET FORTH: BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS: WHEREAS, an application has been made to the City Council for the purpose of changing the zoning ordinance on the followingdescribedrealestate: All of Lots 5 & 6 and the West part of Lots 7 8, Block 9 City Addition more fully described in attached plat and field notes - Exhibit "A". AND WHEREAS, the City Council has submitted the proposed change in the Zoning Ordinance to the City Planning Commission for its recommendation and report; and, WHEREAS, the City Council, before adopting this amendment to the Zoning Ordinance, gave notice of such hearing by publishingsameinaweeklynewspaperintheCityofGeorgetown, Texas, which notice of such -matters as required by law including the time and place of hearing and which time was not earlier than fifteen days from the day of such publication; and WHEREAS, written notice of such matters as required by law was given to all the owners of the land within 200 feet of the above described property as required by law; and WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission has recommended the changing of said Zoning ordinance on the above describedpropertyfrom S Residential Single Famihyistrict to C-1Local. Uommercla-L — District which said meeting qwaselonthe _ 4thday of March , 19 86 . NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, that the Zoning Ordinance,and the Zoning Map of the City of Georgetown, be amended so that the property described above shall be and the same is hereby changed from d_e_ntil _ Ringl a Fi l District to C-1 OCa Ommer ClaaDiastrmi v— Read, passed and adopted this 11thAay of March - 1986. Read, passed and adopted this. day of- , 19_, on the second reading. ATTEST: Pat Cabellero City Secretary Approved as to Form: Stump & Stump City Attorney Carl J. Doering, Mayor City of Georgetown revised 12/85 F) BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS: WHEREAS, an application has been made 11t4 the City CouncilforthepurposeofchangingtheZoningOrdih4nceonthefollowingdescribedrealestate: xi.ver xia a IIA Subdivision, lots 1.8 and 19 Block R as recorded in cabinet F Sli es - o the plat records of Williamson County, as AND WHEREAS, the City Council has submitted the proposedchangeintheZoningOrdinancetotheCityPlanningCommissionforitsrecommendationandreport; and WHEREAS, the City Council before adog,Ving this amendment to the Zoning Ordinance,gave notice of such hearing by publishingsameinaweeklynewspaperintheCityofGeorgetown, Texas, which notice of such matters as required by law including thetimeand.place of hearing and which time was not earlier thanfifteendaysfromthedayofsuchpublication; and WHEREAS, written notice of such matters as required by lawwasgiventoalltheownersofthelandwithin200feetofthe above described property as required by law•;:and WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission has recommended the changing of said Zoning Ordinance on the above described propertyfromRS (residential single family) District toC-1 loca c0ercia District which said meeting was held on the Qthday of_,t February 19 86. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of theCityofGeorgetown, Texas, that the Zoning Ordinance, and theZoningMapoftheCityofGeorgetown, be amended so that the property described above shall be and the same is hereby changedfromRS (residential single family) Districtto -(local commer a District. Read, passed and adopted this ii day of Eehr„ary 19 R6. Read, passed and adopted this 11 day of March 19 86, on the second reading. ATTEST: Y Pat Cabellero City Secretary Approved as to gorm: Stump & Stump City ATtorney Carl J. Doering, Mayor City of Georgetown 1 i r I 140 IDGECR 1 0L (HY G) 6 4 MEADOWBROOK I 257 S IN STREET J) LOCATION MAP FOR BUILDING LINE VARIANCES. MARCH 11, 1986 1 0 I 1 City of Georgetown, Texas """"" G) VARIANCE- BUILDING LINE -614 MEADOWBROOK DRIVE. See location map preceding) Applicant: Neil Proctor 614 Meadowbrook Dr Georgetown Tx 78628 863-5689 Request: Variance from Section 6.1 General Rules for Yards of the City Zoning Ordinance to allow the construction of a detached accessory building some 116" into the side yard area of Lot 9 Block K, San Gabriel Heights Section Four. Facts: Location: Northeast corner of the intersection of the San Gabriel Overlook and Meadowbrook Drive see attached survey plat). Development Plan- District 9b. Zoning District -RS Residential Single Family Existing Land Use- Single Family Residence Surrounding Land Use -Single Family Residential History- House was built and first purchased around 1978 with subsequent sale in 1984. Survey plat indicates an existing encroachment into the same building setback area as that being requested. No record of a previous variance request for this variance has been located. Analysis: San Gabriel Overlook is a residential collector "loop" street which serves the general San Gabriel Heights area providing access to Leander Road. Meadowbrook Drive is a local residential street serving a single long block of medium density residences. There are three general concerns relative to the granting of this request. The first involves the propagation of the disregard for the setback requirements of the ordinance when there is no clearly defined hardship or justification involved. The second concern is one of aesthetics. According to the applicant, the structure proposed is a prefabricated metal storage structure approximately 12 ft. by 16 ft. This structure is to be located adjacent to the existing two car garage on the street" yard side of the primary structure. It Variance- 614 Meadowbrook - page 2 is unclear what is proposed for the existing six foot privacy fence located some five feet behind the face of the garage and extending out almost to the R.O.W. line of the San Gabriel Overlook. Thus the proposed structure will lie forward of this existing fence on the most highly visible (from the intersection) portion of the lot. The third concern is that of sight distance at the intersection. As can be seen on the survey plat the two streets do not intersect at right angles. This in conjunction with the existing fence penetration onto the setback area along San Gabriel Overlook serverely reduces the ability of drivers entering San Gabriel Overlook from Meadowbrook to see approaching southbound vehicles. While the location of the proposed structure will not directly exacerbate this condition to a significant degree, it may imply alterations to the fence which would reduce sight distance. A check of police records indicates that no accidents have been reported at this intersection. Staff Recommendation: Variance should not be granted. Applicant should attempt to locate structure in rear yard area in conjunction with existing accessory building. Council Action: (5-0) Tabled pending resubmittal of request. N e 2 I d/-5,e^,cs Richard Morrow Job No. 3800 0 S 89eoC', kLF j sal I Lo' SLIT 9, BLOCr K, SECTIOLI FouR SAN GABRIGL H61GNT5 -< 6E0V6GT0WU,WILLIAMS0N CODUTY,TEX ,+ r• G0 P O 090 v.o' C Q poke) Lt %/ 0G Vhf a hP ee QOL V +. rO\ Lir R^4 OO GOC r POR. N h Sir O ./ OO. \ J6 S so r'jII Pnp STATE OF TERAS X COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON Z Z=70 L 4 ral rmc¢ ! GYI O 40F,l10j65 IA32AI tJ'U.tf/1c f .z2t__ I unc KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: I, Don H. Bizzell, Registered Professional Engineer, do hereby certify that Lot 9, Block K, Section Four of San Gabriel Heights, a subdivision in George- town, Williamson County, Texas, was surveyed on the ground under my personal supervision and the corners marked as shown on the above plat on April 25, 1978. 20 tuul.Il} .I ,u•r anl••.u) day i u, 7- 54c To: Planning Department Date:Ze%!5.& Subject: Request of Variance--Zertiwg Change A request for Variance is beina requested by: Ad Lot No.-:f_Blk:A_ Add 1tion:g&f g4zg j —/y Reasc 1i .)1'44 Q Please provide oe Building Department with a copy of the final action taken the Planning b Zoning Commission or City Council. FRANK E. WINEINGER Building Official THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN POST t)Nl( 1 lu t\ .it w t )Rt d I(WU N. I X. -NS -sr2c 1l I 1 PHn\I =11 u.t-stt H) VARIANCE- BUILDING LINE - 807 COLLEGE STREET see lcoation map preceeding) Applicant: Louise G Tate 807 College Street Georgetown, Tx 78627 863-5918 Request: Variance from Zoning Ordinance Section 2.0203 Part l.b. to allow the construciton of a detached accessory building some 5.75 ft. into the required 7 ft. rear yard. Facts: Location: Is inside City limits at northeast corner of the intersection of 9th Street and College St. Development Plan -District 6a Zoning District- RS Residential single family Existing land use -Single family residence Surrounding land use - Residential Analysis: According to applicant there was an existing single bay wood frame garage on this site which has been demolished. She wishes to construct a new enlarged garage as shown on the attached survey plat. It appears that either the applicant or a previous owner may have contributed to the problem by an addition to the house and deck in 1985. Aside from the need to maintain the integrity of the ordinance, there are two factors to consider. The first is that 9th St. to the south of applicants lot is a converted alley with no curb and gutter and substandard ROW and pavement width. It is also within 1000 ft. of a school site and has no sidewalk. Thus there may be a future need to widen the street. Based upon the survey plat submitted with the application, the proposed structure may encroach upon this future street ROW if it is improved to normal minimum standards. The second factor is the possible impact upon the property adjacent to the east. If the proposed structure is allowed to encroach upon the 7 ft. rear yard and building setback area this will prevent the adjacent property owner from being able to construct a similar one-story accessory structure within 7 ft. of the common property line without violating the fire code. Staff Recommendation: The variance should not be granted unless applicant can demonstrate sufficient hardship and that applicant "has not contributed to the cause of the hardship of which he complains". Variance- 807 College Street - page 2 City Council Action: (5-0) Approved the granting of variance due to the site restriction created by existing significant trees. 0 TO THE CIfY COUN.IL 3.bject: 14-rch j, ae'.t for v _i• na_ tc =:l -boil: and enlr.rge —r at . Rgmp WiFigA- Block A tl ", I n < 14 1 ^. Lot No. None Reasoning: I need a garage an,! storage space. See attached sheet. I want to rebuild where the ld garage is and enlarge as the shaded area shows. To move the garage a tree or trees would be ae.crl_ficed. R di icerely, Louise G. Tate iL4-_u NJ1U.V 0 (IF 1 IPIh )Jt 111.\'1! 1 To: Planning Department Date:3)11 p -,!G: Subject: Request of Variance A request for Variance - ZeR+flgCFrarrge is being requested by: MR c Love iRT z_ for Address) Bp7 S. 4f L.eS-'E S7, Lot Novw/Blk:_Addition:'/YJP Reason for Rqst: 3 / s k, f_ -<' Please provide the Building Department with a copy of the final action taken by he Planning b Zoning Commission or City Council. ANK E. INEINGER Building Official 1 THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN Pc)Sl OFF]( 1 80 41 nI (,I l IRGFIOWN, T'FXAS 'so?r I1 LI 1'HU!\F ill 'rio7.557; 1.:1111 •I'n,R 111\111 tYPI1aIR o'er rRAME VLI \ 1 rppu /cvec J w \ a. sr0>r rMo NYC .KLOCMCf 0.284 ACRES '. 990/352 O. R. \ m o cwc • _ OWDuric nr \ y \ 421 Y 01'00.00 w IILqq f/0frI0 A• RCYWYrf I ITRIS TRACT 15 NOT IN A FLOOD PRONE W.A ACCDROIJC TO AREA ZAPS, LEmo 1 I IROM PD FDX -o IRDW PIN SET - a PROPERTY LITE - PROPERTY LOCATION : AQ Mlfa STREET, CFOME734N, TDL45, DATE U MRN 19M ' LOT AO. YOIE , RL= 110. A r 6LMIQUON { QMP AOOMOM TO THE OITT OF a—T MA PLAT REO aDI VOLUME 13, PAGE IS OF THE DEED RECORDS OF OJIMMW MKry. TDM. SUWY FOR: Lara C. TATE. REFtRMI LOCHOU TITLE COMPW. RRVEY44mllm AOOISW, ARSTRAtT rO. u. STATE OF TEXAS: CUM OF KRil MN: pIW ALL NEE RT THESE PRESFIITSI •:.•',:' _•L, , . LAE WR1fR=G DOES WEMY aMIFT THAT THIS MET MAS THIS DAY IMDE W THE QMW DF PIE ISMI, 1Ta NO 11MT 71fR£ ARE AO DISiRFPANCIFS, aTAfLItTs, fFnRTASFS DI , ., " .' ppLs of DFRDVEIEIITSr YISIIA.E UTDSiT LUES OR RODS DI PLACE E]IDT T . 1pjDItATID ROADfMT, E'fPT AS 6)HaM IEREON/ tri = I) VARIANCE -BUILDING LINE AND PUE-140 RIDGECREST ROAD See location map preceeding) Applicant: Jim Caskey 140 Ridgecrest Road Georgetown Tx 78628 Request: Variance from Zoning Ordinance Section 2.0203 Part l.b. and applicable dedication provisions of the subdivision plat of Lot 11, Block 6 Oakcrest Estates Riverside Unit as recorded in Cabinet B, Slides 154-158 of the Plat Records of Williamson County, Texas to allow an existing detached accessory building to remain encroached into both the rear, and side yard setback areas which are also both dedicated 10' Public Utility Easements. Facts: Location: Is inside City limits at southwest corner of the intersecticn of Ridgecrest Road with Randolph Road. Development Plan - District 33 Zoning District - RS Residential Single family Existing and Surrounding Land Use - Single family residences History - see copy of applicants request attached. Analysis: Site has been inspected by Public Works Department and it has been determined that no interference with existing utilities or significant sight distance hazard existis as a result of this encroachment. However, future maintenance work on the existing 6" sanitary sewer in the rear PUE may be made more difficult by this encroachment. Also any future use of the 10 ft. PUE along Randolph Road is severely impacted. If the structure is ever demolished it should not be reconstructed within these easements. Staff Recommendation: Granting of variance as requested subject to applicant filing a covenant ihdemnfying the City against damages to said structure which result from the encroachment. This covenant shall be approved by City Attorney prior to recordation. City Council Action: (5-0) Approved as recommended by staff above. SURVEY PERFORMED FOR IMPROVEMENT SURVEY OF 11 _ g oc.. 4 , OnK c, r aTSTGeyCITYO[Gsowr-ETewu 166.6 s vw •T TTS"& F RECORD INiaawFr 8 5Lloee 154- 15e OF THE p AT RECORDS OFt41"` s -se • COUNTY, TEXAS. PERIMETER DESCRIPTION: _ATTACHED SCALE r NOT REQUIRED LEGEND: IRON PIN FOUND • IRON PIN SET O WWO FGI1C4 — i.Ll L L JOB No. 11,!47 February 19, 1986 Mayor Carl Doering and Council Members City of Georgetown P. 0. Box 409 Georgetown, Texas 78627 Re: Lot 11, Block 6, Oak Crest Riverside, 140 Ridgecrest Dear Mayor Doering and Council Members; I am hereby requesting a variance for a detached garage that was built partially onto the back easement of the above referenced lot. The garage in no way blocks any existing utilities already in place. The sewer line is located on the adjacent lot, and the manhole is out near the curb. The garage was built in April, 1976, and the masonry, roof, style, etc. matches the house. At the time the garage was built, this property was not in the City limits. I obtained a variance at that time from the Architectural Committee. Enclosed is a signed copy of this variance. Sincerely, JIM CASKEY JC:jn B U I L D E R Box 878. Georgetown, Texas 78827 xr i aaincae xx_ex April 15, 1976 To: Ot,k Crest Riverside Architectural Committee From: Jim Caskej subject: Side set -back variance --140 Ridgecrest Date: April 15, 1976 Gentlemen; I would like to build a small garage and hot house at the back of my lot. Because there are some trees thatIwouldprefertosave, I am hereby requesting a fifteenfoot (151) side variance. The style, roof' and masonrywillbethesameonthegarageandhothouseasIhave on my house. Sincerely, e r " - ee JIM CASKEY t dU...-- ifl is I r, -Alin C.n} -u •,1,/")I IN41r.. To: Planning Department Subject: Request of Variance ---.Z SLE Cc-PY Date: LGASS A request for Variance -iag 6pge is being requested by: for Address) EFS Lot No.. J1_Blk:Add it1on: Reason for Rqst: A -eAe ZAICAOc/Y Please provide the Building Department with a copy of the final action taken y the Planning b Zoning Commission or City Council. 9 FRANK E. WINEINGER Building Official THE CITY OF 6FO RGET(W.'N P(KT "I I I(1 11, I IR(.I. 10%\ N II .CAti -an_c I H I PHO1NE Fol-:ai h;l H( Plr •R III\la InIPLu1rR J) VARIANCE -BUILDING LINE -1257 SOUTH MAIN STREET see location map preceeding) Applicant: Larue Hemberger 1257 South Main Georgetown, Tx 78627 869-2505 Request: Variance from Zoning Ordinance Section 2.0203 Part I.b. to allow the construction of a detached accessory building some 8 ft, into the required 10 ft. street side yard, 4 ft. into the required 7 ft. interior side yard, and 4 ft. into the required 7 ft, rear yard. Also a variance from Zoning Ordinance Section 2.0203 Part I.c. to allow an increase from 308 to approximately 328 in the area of the lot covered by structures is requested. Facts: Legal Description: Lot 1 and the South 65 feet of Lot 2, Block I of the Logan Addition as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 26 of the Plat records of Williamson County, Texas. Location: Is inside City limits at northeast corner of the intersection of Xth Street with Main Street Development Plan -District 1 Zoning District -RS Residential single family Existing & Surrounding Land Use- Appears to be single family residential Analysis: According to the survey plat submitted by applicant there are two existing Building Line encroachments on the property. The existing garage encroaches across the full 10 ft. street side yard and the deck at the rear of the house encroaches across the full 7 ft interior side yard (first floor terraces may project in a required yard as long as they are at least two feet from the adjacent lot line per Zoning Ordinance Section 6.204). Applicant has indicated that the existing garage is to be demolished. Additionally, according to the original subdivision plat of this area the unidentified area bounded by dashed lines on the survey plat is a 12 ft. alley. It has not been determined whether or not this alley still exists. An abandonment or vacating plat may be required. Variance -1257 S. Main Street - page 2 Staff Recommendation: Denial of all variances requested. should be reduced in length by 10 indicated on the attached Exhibit resolution of the issue regarding City Council Action: (5-0) Proposed structure ft. and sited as A", subject to the the alley ROW. Denial pending resubmittal of request upon resolution of status of the allwy R.O.W. crossing property. 1,257 / A t rur qI 'c},u.Qt + o r c. - IJ l l l h. w..v-1 ct.. lil CSL a`i-Lr --,- -Cz rQ-, O r aC `4 O cc. J cL . -K 3. S -tin rte. yz o b k o -s q. Sb`r O4 IIQ- ' 6 'A Y U10-.& 4x_&4 -8%,%,r4 MOON . T 'lo..l A a. k,. '7 1S CN I C I. Q.i '.b0 YS rte. o-N'•t k It..t4.sir hpw aS mNaa w i r,Lt`wvu tciln>. 44-Q r e w i . cx" wu.w Qti„JCrpti 3 L/ G _ 2So LVII- L: . t,l Okr, W I.VIN17111i 111,141R 171.\111" To: Planning Department Date: z. 6 Fc- a 2x-4 Subject: Request of Variance - +Haaga A request for -Variance- is being requested by: l T/ C/ i E C for Address) Lot No. Bik: Addition: 6 Reason for Rqst: _aLLOLfJ 32 % L-A-,7-- 7- L A-,7-- TL Please provide the Building Department with a copy of the final action taken y the Planning L Zoning Commission or City Council. FRANK E. WIN ER Building Official TO }t%Oft,EJ d y/iti oto Csry>`7Lir%d ,v THE CrIY Of GEORGETOWN PO>r OEl it I 8O\ .1, GIORGI.IMVN. IEXAS 71to2o 1•1.OA: "POW MNIITNIA I q IN 1 J I I I WHONE Si7.'sn3-svvt SUJEE F E @RMDORE roe No. - 4 • LdRu E LIEM 6 ZG Q IMPSURVEY OF 1Ni ldsnEoweeo iia¢swsw Quo Wic, iVla¢ o sr c. O RECORD`.:114Ve M 95,a , FLae 7/r& OF THE oeeo RECORDS OF y; l si.: e>` COUNTY, TEXAS. PERIMETER DESCRIPTION,ATTACHED SCALE: I"= SO' NOT REQUIRED LEGEND: IRON PIN FOUND • i'•, IRON PIN SET e J • O f T__N r,•, M.•A!N STREET N I: fOVEREO /pRtu `` 4.o S 'Z T 3 I AO' Hf• e): I .. 3e to s = 3, sg. ry > U I I257savn+Lulusrccf4 •• i.• a K iv q i :.0 t- DLi/tiFD A Id j I • W k L+T I.t OR Z,I nn+ta. O IN 1.• .i Q I '.. KSAP S wAt, FIS 1 tr . So uTN 45.0 ' ' V ,. FIELD NOTES FOR LARUE HEMBERGER: BEING a portion of Outlot 1, Division IS, city of Georgetown, Williamson County, Texas; said land being called Lot 1 and the South 65 feet of Lot 2, Block 1 of the Logan Addition, ati addition of record in Book 1, Page 26 now filed in Cabinet A, Slide 26) of the Plat Records of Williamson County, Texas. Said land being that certain tract of land as conveyed to William Edward Harshaw and wife, Margaret Eilleen Harshaw by deed as recorded in Volume 953, Page 266, of the Deed Records of Williamson County, Texas. Surveyed on the ground in the month of January, 1985, under the supervision of Don H. Bizzell, Registered Public Surveyor, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron pin found at the intersection of the East line of Main Street and the North line of 16th Street (Glasscock Avenue) marking the Southwest corner of the above -referenced Harshaw tract, said point being the Southwest corner of the said Lot 1, Block 1, of the Logan Addition for the Southwest corner hereof; THENCE, along the East line of Main Street, North 65.06 feet to an iron pin found for the Northwest corner of the said Harshaw tract, for the Northeast corner hereof; THENCE, S 88' 57' 30" E, 177.20 feet to an iron pin set for the Northeast corner of the said Harshaw tract, for the Northeast corner hereof; THENCE, South, 65.06 feet to an iron pin found on the North line of 16th Street, marking the Southeast corner of the said Harshaw tract, for the Southeast corner hereof; THENCE, along the said South line of 16th Street, N 88° 57' 30" W, 177.20 feet to the Place of BEGINNING. Page 2 of 2 Job No. H1114q4 W-1-4 r1 D r w0C forest S f ij t,. . I • R 4 N ` I w N1_ I . . L11 i I% U1 ocif Sf: FTTFwc 41- t X -- 1 4LlL' Q i ~( 1 lu_LN J D D Mc ciro Sf.l T T Eow 41ud" L..-1_ i. 1 J .l,tLWN J Clt cc•ch _ _ St. EiM7' 4t- i w V • i 4 N % w V 4 N I W w 1lIet,retc lsv 7 :. v I „ o . V. r 4 ` v ti " r V .. , . V . V .. o. ',V• 4 w w ti I I w w N W F..` ._ w ...` >R W N • w M 'R ta. H . i' 10 o 1 IN c T, 7 2 + w r zw EXHIBIT "B" UNIVERSITY -ELM STREET HISTORICAL DISTRICT DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SCALE: I"=300' A UARY 1986 s r. L q 3 yy O pO / o 1 IN c T, 7 2 + w r zw EXHIBIT "B" UNIVERSITY -ELM STREET HISTORICAL DISTRICT DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SCALE: I"=300' A UARY 1986 The color prints referenced as an attachment to the following memo were not available for inclusion in the agenda packet. MEMORANDUM To: Mayor and City Council From: John Warden, Chief Planner- Long Range Planning Subject: Council Adoption of Georgetown's Development Plan Date: March 7, 1986 Each of you has received copies of the Comprehensive Plan Studies prepared by planning consultant Samuel Wyse. The three study volumes are: a) Development Analysis, Population Study and Land Use, April, 1983; b) Thoroughfare Plan, May, 1985; and c) Parks and Recreation Plan, May 1985. Attached are xerox copies of the maps summarizing the recommendations of the three respective studies. Although these studies have frequently been cited in staff analysis and Council discussions of various development proposals, the Council has not formally adopted them. The attached color print titled "Development Plan" is a composite of the three respective plan maps. The staff recommends that the Council approve the attached resolution adopting the Development Plan as the land use element of Georgetown's comprehensive plan. The staff is aware of several major limitations of the composite'Development Plan and the studies in which it is based. There are some inconsistencies among the three studies' recommendations, and several traditional comprehensive plan elements (e.g. economic base analysis; socioeconomic profile) have not been prepared in support of the land use recommendations. Most notably the Development Plan does not reflect recent proposals, and various stages of approval granted, for development of the Tri -Tract sites. The Plan does not cover the entire ETJ, nor does it anticipate relatively higher residential densities of many developments approved in the last couple of years. Despite such shortcomings, the Development Plan still reflects the general urban framework of the community. Approved projects which are inconsistent with the plan represent de facto amendments which will be reflected in the next update of the Plan map. Until such an update occurs within the broader process of inventory and analysis of the complete range of development influences, adoption of the Development Plan will provide an officially recognized basis for findings of appropriateness in support of Council actions. Finally, Council's adoption of the Development Plan with its acknowledged limitations will affirm the progress of recent years in planning for the city's growth while demonstrating the need for an ongoing planning process. The Planning and Zoning Commission on March 4 recommended by a 4-0 vote that the Council adopt the Development Plan as shown in the attached color print. The staff recommends that you approve the attached resolution adopting the Development Plan. 4:3-L W JOHN WARDEN, AICP attachments DEVELOPMENT PLAN City of Georgetown, Texas 55 Future TburOY.bt.r.. Lep. PulO.ntla Norm.l NulOmtl.l T..F.m111 Multi-f.mlly cnm rc1.1 Scribble . Vuh. JCL t Public . Semi -Public ma1D.^-'• a..tNa L '..M . m THOROUGHFARE PLAN City of Georgetown, Texas 23 L E G E N D Eal.unp TnoroupM.r. F Future Teer.upRl.r. E.bunp Cep..ter Fulur. Coll.otor T". of R..e...T F/Y/C Tnttl, E.n.. 2/416 oNle.erunm.la.a o/u I 0 r PLATE 2 4 FUTURE L E G E N D Eal.tln° Pork Lend. PARKS PLAN OtherOen tn.. Op.P sP... Z'Shbor"oP° P.r. City of Georgetown, Texas Per..Z'lP:;,.. 23 PL ...d ....,..o M City of Georgetown City Council Meeting March 25, 1986 7:00 pm Planning Items: 1. Variance- Building Line -614 Meadowbrook Dr 2. Variance- Fence -1700 Leander Street 3. Variance- Reinstatement of Final Plat-Tricorners 4. Variance- Subdivision Ordinance Section'3.05-Williamsburg Village 5. Ordinance: Amendment to Historic Preservation Section of Zoning Ordinance -2nd Reading Planning Report 7-)% J ki Y LOCATION MAP FOR BUILDING LINE VARIANCES. MARCH 25, 1986 City of Georgetown, Texas v 614 MEADOWBROOK DRIVE -VARIANCE -ENCROACHMENT INTO BUILDING SETBACK AND PUE See location map preceding) Applicant: Neil Proctor 614 Meadowbrook Dr Georgetown, Tx 78628 86:x5689 Request: Variance from Section 2.0203 (b) Side and Rear Yard Area Regulations of the City Zoning Ordinance and the dedication provisions of the subdivision plat to allow to remain the encroachment of a detached accessory building some V6" into the rear PUE and 3"into the rear yard and to allow to remain the encroachment of the primary residence some 10 ft. into the required side yard area of Lot 9, Block K, San Gabriel Heights Section Four. Facts: Location: Northeast corner of the intersection of the San Gabriel Overlook and Meadowbrook Drive see attached survey plat.) Development Plan -District 9b. Zoning District -RS Residential Single Family Existing Land Use -Single Family Residential Surrounding Land Use -Single Family Residential History- House was built and first purchased around 1977 with subsequent sale in 1984. Survey plat indicates existing encroachments:. No record of a previous variance request for this encroachment has been located. A previous request for an additional variance for a 2nd accessory building to encroach upon the street side yard was tabled at the Council meeting of March 11th pending resolution of existing encroachments. Analysis: Applicant has dropped previous request for a second accessory building encroachmentinto street side yard. The current request involves two encroachments existing when he purchased the property. The Public Works Division has determined that there is no existing or planned use by the City for the 10 ft. PUE at the rear of the lot. Variance -614 Meadowbrook - page 3 Planning Staff Recommendation: Granting of variance to allow existing encroachments to remain as shown on survey plat submitted. Applicant is notified that Section 6.105 of Zoning Ordinance will continue to apply. This regulation allows repair and remodeling of structures in violation but not reconstruction or structural alteration. Additionally, a condition of granting the variance for the encroachment of the accessory building into the 10 ft. PUE shall be that in the event that the City should ever need to utilize this easement, then the applicant and/or subsequent owner shall cause to be removed this encroachment. City Council Action: (5-0) Approved with conditions as recommeded by Planning Department above. n Nwe ti S J M n I / r I I / I I / I Richard Morrow I Job No. 3800 10 fit L0 A E x512 I T_ Loge rr rn5Chetan , B. L• ly a i2'3/' o, pi I 6//_Y,y T 9, BLOLY' K, SE lou >=ouR Sr+N GA$g1EL 1.161G1,ITs ti6EOe6FTowtJ,WIIL1AMS0N CODUT`{,TOC La 5• n it+ C, . 73.8• 'f Q1 s Q < . r . SALE /'= 2C OCYJ o- oa` Qom.' cO R 7 EP 9-06 e 0 re' m 6 4 a 4 FL 9 C1°feat/ o -e j 5 I O OFtE7TE5 /B u o 25.6 G VJ 5 $ 8e a3 00- 6 R STATE OF TEXAS X KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON I I, Don H. Bizzell, Registered Professional Engineer, do hereby certify that Lot 9, Block K, Section Four of San Gabriel Heights, a subdivision in George- town, Williamson County, Texas, was surveyed on the ground under my personal supervision and the corners marked as shown on the above plat on April 25, 1978. Z Igo M/ 1 I / r I I / I I / I Richard Morrow I Job No. 3800 10 fit L0 A E x512 I T_ Loge rr rn5Che tan , B. L• ly a i2'3/' o, pi I 6//_Y,y T 9, BLOLY' K, SE lou >=ouR Sr+N GA$g1EL 1.161G1,ITs ti6EOe6FTowtJ,WIIL1AMS0N CODUT`{,TOC La 5• n it+ C, . 73.8• 'f Q1 s Q < . r . SALE /'= 2C OCYJ o- oa` Qom.' cO R 7 EP 9-06 e 0 re' m 6 4 a 4 FL 9 C1°feat/ o -e j 5 I O OFtE7TE5 /B u o 25.6 G VJ 5 $ 8e a3 00- 6 R STATE OF TEXAS X KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON I I, Don H. Bizzell, Registered Professional Engineer, do hereby certify that Lot 9, Block K, Section Four of San Gabriel Heights, a subdivision in George- town, Williamson County, Texas, was surveyed on the ground under my personal supervision and the corners marked as shown on the above plat on April 25, 1978. Y (LSI %I I IN I I t 4 4 I )111" 1K III %I I t'. To: Planning Department Date: Subject: Request of Variance A request for Variance - __... _.._ is being requested by: for Address) Lot No.--!?—_Blk:—.,K_ Addition: -!5 twEjg Reason for Rgst:,1Q A,..a,q --- i - iRe a ,,e. ,sreR,*VB o sr - o ". , r , :, i sem_ fly. a Gio as a .4d bc d L-- l i. - L , Piease provide the Building Department with a copy of the final action taken by the Planning E Zoning Commission or City Council. FRANK E. WINEINGE. Building Official THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN POST Of F1( I EON -ttw GEOKGETOWN, TINA', 7862o IELI'PHONE 512 'Y03-5533 41 1q,141 UPM1Pl111111 EMMurtF 1700 Leander Street - Variance - Building Line and Yard Requirements. See location map preceding) Applicant: Tom Sessums 1700 Leander Street Georgetown, Tx 78626 86 3-79 32 Request: Variance from Section 8.302 Rules for Fences of the Zoning Ordinance to allow the construction of a 6 ft. solid screen fence within the required front yard along the west line of a 1.2676 acre parcel out of the Clement Stubblefield Survey Abstract no. 558 and being all of Outlot 13 and portion of Outlot 12, Division "A", Revised City of Georgetown Map. Facts: Location: South of 17th Street between Leander Street and Railroad Street. See Attached survey plat. Surrounding Use: City Park lies to the north, a non- conforming commercial use area to the east, single-family residential uses to south and west. Eastside Elementary School is within 1000 ft. of the site. Railroad spur runs along and just beyond west property line. Surrounding Zoning: RS Residential Single Family & RM -3 Existing Use: Primary structure is single family residence. Two accessory buildings are also on site. Site is used for the storage of commercial vehicles. Existing Zoning: RS Residential Single Family District Reference- Section 8:302 of City Zoning Ordinance states in part ..no fence more that- ten (10) percent solid over four (4) feet high shall be located in any required front yard." Analysis: By ordinance a standard 6 ft. chain link type (less than 108 solid) fence is allowed along all property lines including the front yard. Also, solid fences under four feet are permitted. However, fences in excess of four feet high must be no more than 108 solid. 1700 Leander Street - page 2 The parcel in question is somewhat unusual in that it is bounded on three sides by existing streets; Leander Street to the east, 17th Street to the north and Railroad Street to the west. The zoning ordinance states that when a lot is bounded by two non -intersecting streets, then a front yard is required on both streets. However, in this case the Georgetown Railroad Spur runs between the paved portion of the railroad R.O.W. and the west line of the subject property. Thus "Railroad Street" is actually a paved portion of Georgetown Railroad R.O.W. and not a dedicated public street. It does appear however that the City did pave this roadway and has performed some maintenance of it over the years. Thus, a R.O.W. by prescription may exist. Since there is no access from the subject property across the tracks to Railroad Street, it does not appear that the granting of the variance would violate the intent of the ordinance regulation. Another issue relative to this site is that according to the Building Official the use of this site for the overnight storage, maintenance and repair of commercial vehicles is in violation of the Zoning District regulations. Thus the granting of the variance may appear to propagate the illegal use. However, it should be noted that the difference between granting the variance and not granting the variance is the difference between a chain link type fence along the railroad tracks and a solid screen fence. It would seem more appropriate to control any use violation more directly through strict enforcement of the Zoning District use regulations in conjunction with City Code Section 22.47 which prohibits the parking of vehicles in excess of one ton within residential districts. Staff Recommendation: Granting of the variance with the following conditions: 1. No access to Railroad Street shall be allowed. 2. The solid screen fence shall not be constructed closer than 25 ft. from the northwest corner of the property. City Council Action: (5-0) Table the request. Request staff to prepare a report on why enforcement of City Codes have not occured on this property. fl SCALE 1 = 100` HUTCHIE WILLIAMS i I u I I I AND ERNESTINE\ HpMAS PARKER MARVIN -J MARY JOHNSON TOMS it SURvEY Plat of 1.2676 acres of land in Georgetown, Williamson County, Texas. EC,END Q-- Propar L%nt P%on,f ci Lcnc6 Reco,.,.,,-ended R CITY OF GEORGETOWN PARR 7fh STREET v H e s oo'oo" e 4z 201 7 /5 B.G. LA meH b I I I , / f .galyd i su-ea^n-ASIrn 00 TOM lWy SESSUMS p IIx V 1.2676ac. I praav/.' o scrae, JOHN SUDDUTH n><e/Se ren 3 I I I I I CHAPMAN, VINTNER, B WOLF I 4/on-Can orrnl'G i I I I i V67 ianc e, /c4 ceS' toll' 170 Z&rrder 74o perr,;f 7`ia c ar sra' o{/.s c r,rsxe Gli iin 7 e I•e'c.i.•-eco l q. 7i EDGIAR RUBEN GAQISON, JR BERRERA\ 4.H. ERNES Cl) rORGAN W11 1 Nt 1 1 8 rh STRLI r Q I I AND ERNESTINE\ HpMAS PARKER MARVIN -J MARY JOHNSON TOMS it SURvEY Plat of 1.2676 acres of land in Georgetown, Williamson County, Texas. EC,END Q-- Propar L%nt P%on,f ci Lcnc6 Reco,.,.,,-ended R CITY OF GEORGETOWN PARR 7fh STREET v H e s oo'oo" e 4z 201 7 /5 B.G. LA meH b I I I , / f .galyd i su-ea^n-ASIrn 00 TOM lWy SESSUMS p IIx V 1.2676ac. I praav/.' o scrae, JOHN SUDDUTH n><e/Se ren 3 I I I I I CHAPMAN, VINTNER, B WOLF I 4/on-Can orrnl'G i I I I i V67 ianc e, /c4 ceS' toll' 170 Z&rrder 74o perr,;f 7`ia c ar sra' o{/.s c r,rsxe Gli iin 7 e I•e'c.i.•-eco l q. COMMUNITY OF OPPORTUNITY" March 20, 1986 Charles H Myers The Ve turerinmpanies 4107 p' Springs Road # 07 Au 79759 RE Soufhfork Apts. Invoice #63 Dear Mr. Myers; Your letter to Mr. Stump was forwarded to us so that the iafermet#ea-qen-regne9ted-eould be sent we could send you the requested information. Enclosed you will find a copy of the Fee Ordinance and back up documentation from your development review. This documentation was compiled by Renee Hanson, former Planning Director, from the F & N bills. Should you need clarification or further information concerning these documents, please do not hesitate to contact the Planning Department. The Fee Ordinance, that a developer is engineering review refered to in your letter, states to be informed or "notified" before fees over $1000.00 are incurred for his or her project. THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN POST OFFICE BOX 409 GEORGETOWN, TEXAS 78627-0409 TELEPHONE 512/863-5533 AN EQUAL OPPoRNN?Y EMPLOYER Tri -Corners - Variance - Reinstatement of Final Plat Location Map 111=2000' Applicant: Tri -Corners Joint Venture PO Box 1114 Georgetown, Tx 78627) 86:-9501 Agent: Steger & Bizzell, Inc. I PO Box 858 Georgetown, Tx 78627 863-4521 ` Request: A variance as required by Section 4.03 Part 8 of the subdivision ordinance providing an extension of the final plat approval for Tri -Corners is requested by Tri -Corners Joint Venture. Final Plat approval expired March 10, 1986. (see copy of request letter attached.) Analysis: Tri -Corners is in the Georgetown E.T.J. and has requested no city utilities. It consists of 2.02 acres proposed for commercial use and lies in the southwest corner of the intersection of County Road 151 and Hwy 81. Staff Recommendation: Granting of request and extending final plat approval for three months. The new expiration date shall be June 10, 1986. City Council Action: (5-0) Approved as recommended by staff above. A Steger £ Bi, Lne. CONSULTING ENGINEERS — SURVEYORS P. O. BOX 858 • GEORGETOWN, TEXAS 78627 March 3, 1986 Mr. Ed Barry, Chairman And Members of the Georgetown City Council P.O. Box 409 Georgetown, Texas 78626 512) 883-4521 IGw,geown PhPna 512) 255-2582 IAufun Pnono Re: Tri -Corners Job No. E 9302-3 Dear Mr. Barry: MAR 6 Please consider this letter a request for a three month extension of the above mentioned subdivision. This extension is being requested because the approval notice for the water pollution abatement plan has not been received. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. PCS:lh 206/6062PCS.01 Rea ctfully su fitted, 6Perry C. Steger Project Manager MEMBER NSPE TSPE ASCE PMI TSA J vi Please consider this letter a request for a three month extension of the above mentioned subdivision. This extension is being requested because the approval notice for the water pollution abatement plan has not been received. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. PCS:lh 206/6062PCS.01 Rea ctfully su fitted, 6Perry C. Steger Project Manager MEMBER NSPE TSPE ASCE PMI TSA WILLIAMSBURG VILLAGE -VARIANCE ALLOWING BUILDING PERMIT PRIOR TO COMPLETION OF SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS Location Map Applicant: Zared Corporation Rt. 4 Box 4284 Belton, Tx 76513 Agent: Victor Turley 301 N. 3rd St. Temple, Tx 76501 869-7961 Request: 1"=2000' The granting of a variance from Section 3.05 of the City Subdivision Ordinance to allow the issuance of utility and/or building permits prior to completion of required improvements. Facts: Location: At the southwest corner of Booty's Crossing Rd. and Williams Drive. Surrounding Area: Is commercial and undeveloped. Existing zoning is C -2B (Commercial Second Height District). Variance - Williamsburg Village - page 2 Proposed Use: Two retail commercial lots Development Plan: District 4a Acreage: 10.28 History: Plat was conditionally approved by Council.on July 9, 1985 and .recorded March 20, 1986. Reference: Section 3.05 of Subdivision Ordinance reads: "The City of Georgetown will not furnish any City service temporary or permanent, or issue any plumbing, electric or building permits until all subdivision utility, street and drainage construction has been completed and accepted by the City of Georgetown. (No Exceptions) " Analysis: Section 5.10 Variances of Subdivision Ordinance states that the City Council may approve variance to the strict enforcement of the Georgetown Subdivision Ordinance when in its opinion the variance will not stbstantially violate the legislative intent. Applicant has offered the following conditions to secure variance: The following criteria will be met prior to issuance of a building permit: 1. A performance bond issued to the City of Georgetown will guarantee the completion of all unfinished improvements necessary for City acceptance of subdivision. 2. The City will not issue Certificates of Occupancy until all subdivision improvements have been completed and accepted by the City of Georgetown Public Works Division. 3. All other criteria the City of Georgetown has for issuance of building permits will be met. The nature of the required improvements is a large stormwater detention facility; 2300 linear feet of water line both on-site and off-site; and 1275 linear feet of sanitarysewerlinebothon-site and off-site. The acceptance of surety agreements in lieu of completed construction is common practice for many Cities. Williamson County requires the posting of surety in conjunction with 1. all necessary requ ements for recordation can be completed in 30 to 90 days. gineering Review fees have not been paid. Staff Recommendation: Granting of a three month,. upon all outstanding fees prior to recordation. City Council Action: -0 granting of a three month upon all outstanding fees paid prior to recordation. nsion of apFfroval conditional on this project being paid extension of approval conditional due on this project being UOi-4.IP aad a Pq Variance- Williamsburg Village - page 3 recordation for plats in the ETJ. This issue is also being considered by the Citizens Advisory Committee in the process of revising the City Subdivision Ordinance. Both the. -Public Works Division and the Building Department have indicated no objection to the requested variance, as long as the previously mentioned criteria have been met. The Planning Department has concern about the precedent which may be set by granting this variance. The initial precedent for this type of variance was established with the granting of request for the issuance of building permits for model homes prior to completion of subdivision work in University Park Section One (Jan. 1986) and Raintree Subdivision (Feb. 1986). The granting of this request takes the precedent even further in that: 1. No interim use different from end use is proposed for permitted structures, 2. End use for structure is commercial, as opposed to residential, 3. The size and scale of structure is significantly greater. If a substantial number of projects are granted variance, it will significantly increase the demand on staff time to administer and coordinate this program. Also without clear, written procedural guidelines for administation the potential for error is high. If granted it shoud be conditional upon both the City Attorney and the Public Works Division approving the surety agreement. Planning Staff Recommendation: Planning Department does not recommend granting of variance. City Council Action: ( 3-2) Approval of request with the following conditions being met: A performance bond issued to the City of Georgetown will guarantee the completion of all unfinished improvements necessary for City acceptance of subdivision. 2. The City will not issue Certificates of Occupancy until all subdivision improvements have been completed and accepted by the City of Georgetown Public Works Division. 3. All other criteria the City of Georgetown has for issuance of building permits will be met. 4. The fire protection system shall be operational. lS.`199 AC, SANDERS SON CROSSING / Y ' ic t!0' 4'7 •.t`T . Il^ GS °ROPERiIESWakr B007Y S—CROSSING..- 4e0 .6 READ b'[Dw.l~ _ Pti1' 286. Ll' (Pp 1 NPe` lw a •• 180.40• 5 pG5 SCI•' cnDxC. r.[ CnF4 s9 JSED R 0XILOTI bP !( LIST AC. LUT 1lb 95ED R_O.W,— 4 t \ ' /i<y .f 4i O•! L 2`'. h ORNER .• S°f s°>F' F t ' >KLi i:.s s" uiPPE V ,n 4s i \ e'tivAF, AY rmk 1S Y J \• at- PO. 6:569 std "fuP >"vs L.[•De\ -- e[,POOn w EPEE'> 0>' itlCf E+ . )P 7;: cC ^O Pn c> ° POP' > tco PD E 4tP : j. rip'. \ /i t> P•4 e tWxO` . x. `-ae 1t M. x. WMY OOP^ Y.' 1x40ix0 to ' a r WI Pr oin..f •+ ,`<'Pt4>t+63S SSSe a'f °2 L Hnj 6 r oho vu[ vane Lou orvwn - kl be ri Vs* {IA-4r. I. rr.'I o ro 1/rl c. fS C o's a 1 •3 1C,.o ra`3 om h--1!+Yl O4— "2101 i. 8VW 01- act GJcv+ IgG 3Zf 3 (il 3 -1 2 3+3J bN dc o l S ON -PIC-,om 3m Z3fv t n0 3 s 7 44t r q `1 d 53.(.o?-j-Sc[v OJ jJ{ ` r c3 C©}3f 3 Cp3Nc lQ Sl 3`11, n `7 n,,• fA- b,.,,> l `')-}-3. S Ptl 3C'I nC J 3M \pNM rvl 3vin,+ 319 a n Q 4-01bl s) sNy+- sm cv cvno C o's a 1 •3 1C,.o ra`3 om h--1!+Yl O4— "2101 i. 8VW MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor, and City Council FROM: Randy Stump, City Attorney SUBJECT: Specialized Legal Consulting Services DATE: March 18, 1986 As directed by the Council, I have met with Frank Reed, Ed Barry, and John Warden concerning selection of a consulting attorney to work with the staff and Stump & Stump in drafting new zoning and subdivision ordinances. I concur that these ordinances should be reviewed by an attorney specializing in land use law. I am working with the Planning staff in reviewing the qualifications of several candidate firms, and I expect that we will jointly recommend a firm for the Council's approval in your regular meeting on April 8, 1986. Stump & Stump p`t MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: John Warden, Chief Planner, Long -Range Planning SUBJECT: Update of the "Development Plan" DATE: March 18, 1986 The update of the Development Plan can be completed during the fourth quarter of this fiscal year. As stated prior to Council's approval of the resolution adopting the Development Plan on March 11, only a few amendments to the map would be required to clear up its most obvious deficiencies. As Samuel Wyse acknowledges, though, in his 1985 "Development Impact Analysis," the cumulative impacts of all development approvals granted since the Plan was presented in 1983 are much greater than those projected in the comprehensive planning studies on which the Development Plan is based. An update of the plan should therefore reflect as thoroughly as possible all approved developments which are not consistent with the Development Plan. A major task involved in the update will be the inventory of such development approvals. As the thoroughfares shown on the updated Plan must accomodate approved development, major rights-of-way in approved plats will be shown among the Plan's proposed thoroughfares. The thoroughfares within old Georgetown can be re-evaluated within the revised city-wide network. A preferred MoKan alignment should be selected and reconciled with the proposed inner loop. Regarding parks and open space, discrepancies between the Future Parks Plan map and the Development Plan will be resolved in an updated Plan. While the graphic Development Plan does not indicate utility systems or other major public facilities, the update will involve at least a general reassessment of utility capacities, utility service areas, and public services in general. These topics are also fundamental to the city's Annexation Plan, which is now scheduled for completion in May. As the Annexation Plan will dictate the appropriate geographical extent of the planning area to be covered by the Development Plan, the final version of the updated Development Plan should not be prepared until the Annexation Plan has been approved. Allowing time for late adjustments to the Plan and for miscellaneous, unanticipated tasks the updated Development Plan should be presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission in July 1986. JOHN WARDEN, AICP MEMO TO: Frank Reed, City Manager Mayor and City Council From: Edward J. Barry, AICP-Director, Division of Community Development and Planning Date: March 1B, 1986 Subject: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program The Texas Department of Community Affairs (TDCA) is the State Agency approved by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to administer the small cities Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program. These CDBG funds are available to local municipalities under 50,000 population throughout the state. They are intended to primarily benefit low and moderate income persons, eliminate and prevent conditions of slums and blight and address problems which present an imminent threat." To obtain such funding a city has to submit a grant application to TDCA for review and approval. This is a very competitive process with many cities applying and only a few being awarded grants. In the past the city has received such grants and is currently finishing up one such grant which is being used for the San Jose Neighborhood Project. Since the new application and funding cycle is about to start we need to decide what the city should do about making application for these monies. I'm writing this memo as it is my understanding that the Community Development and Planning Division was supposed to be the city agency responsible for grants administration. In early March TDCA conducted a meeting to review in general the program requirements for the CDBG program. Several important aspects of this program quickly became evident. One is that the level of funding for the program has decreased from last year and this doesn't take into account the effects of the Gramm-Rudman Budget Reduction Act recently passed by Congress. So, program funds are still liable to fall from current estimates. Thus competition will in all liklihood be stiffer than in the past. Eligibility for funding is determined in large part on the level of deprivation that exists in the community. Poverty rate, median income, unemployment rate,etc. are major factors in determining a city's eligibility. The program usually requires local matching funds as a condition of funding. Also, a key component is the type of projects to be undertaken and how they relate to overall program goals and requirements. Lastly, although not by any means least, are the administrative and monitoring requirements for the program which have to be satisfied. All this adds up to a significant investment in manpower, time, and money to operate such a program. If we are to make application for such a grant several things must be considered. First is the level of resources which will need It to be devoted to preparing the grant application. Additional staffing or consultants will be required to prepare the application with no guarantee of return on investment. In the past the City has employed the services of a consultant in this effort. Last year we were unsuccessful in our bid for a grant, falling well down on the priority list of applicants. Second, is the need to determine what we wish to accomplish if we are awarded a grant. Thirdly, and maybe most important is our chance of success in obtaining CDBG funding. Given that funding levels are down from past allocations and thus competition for such grants -is greater than it has been before and that our level of deprivation on a city wide scale is not as "bad" as many other communities our odds of securing a grant are not extremely high. Lastly, the level of maximum grant award ($300,000 to $500,000) does not allow for making substantial improvements on a large scale and so the benefits achieved must be balanced against the costs of the program. Based upon past experience with small cities CDBG programs and a quick review of our chances of success for getting a grant, it does not appear to be in our best interest at this time to pursue this grant program. Therefore, I would not recommend the City expend the effort and incur the expense involved in preparing a CDBG application for this program year. I would be interested in hearing your comments on this matter. It should be remembered that if we do wish to submit an application to TDCA for CDBG funding we need to begin in the very near future. F CITY COUNCIL THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN The City of Georgetown City Counci APPROVE ISAPPROVES/TABLES/ WITHDRAWS the request listed below, yWITNESSOURHANDSthisdayof }/ r(3i ly 86 12 Mayor, City Cou cil City of Ge$r¢g vn PROJECT _ ui_ inti Line Variance and PUE Variance-140 Ridgecrest Road APPLICANT Jim Caskev LOCATION 140 Ridgecrest road. The intersection of Ridgecrest Rd with Randolph Road. REQUEST variance from zoningordnanince section 2.0203 part l.b. and applicable dedication provisio s o su .vision p at to a ow an CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: the rear, and side yard setback areas, which are also both dedicated 10, Public Utility Easements. granting of'variance as requested, subject to applicant filing a covenant indemnfying the Cityagainstdamagestosaidstructurewhichresultfromtheencroachment. This covenant shall be approvedbyCityAttorneypriortorecordation. CITY COUNCIL THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN The City of Georgetown City Counci APPROV$ /DISAPPROVES/TABLES/ WITHDRAWS the request listed belo j WITNESS OUR HANDS this 11 day of Ma 1 19 86 Mayor, City Council City of Georgetown PROJECT .Zoning change -Part of Rik 9. Revised C;tv of rAPPLICANTCraigMBrown2MAP LOCATION the west half of the block between 2 Streets on the west side of Austin Ave. REQUEST C-1 Local commercial. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: use for site shall be restricted to retail saleOfgoodsandserviceswhichservethelocalareaasprojectedbytheNorthwestC.B.D. Plan, commercial parking lot, and professional officeuse. CITY COUNCIL THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN The City of Georgetown City Coun 1 AP` PRS/DISAPPROVES/TABLES/ WITHDRAWS the request listed below --Th consent) WITNESS OUR HANDS this 11 day of March 19 86 l Mayor, City Coun it City of Georgetown iPROJECTvariancefinalplatreinstatement -River ThreeA APPLICANT Gary Dayton LOCATION adjacent to Hwy 2243. REQUEST variance as required by Section 4.03 Part 8 of the Subdivision CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: granting of variance as requested for a three month extension of plat approval subject to the conditions of original plat approval. New expiration date for this plat shall be June 11, 1986. M CITY COUNCIL THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN The City of Georgetown City Counci- APPROVES IrlAPPROVES/T.IBLES/ WITHDRAWS the request listed below. 0%\/ WITNESS OUR HANDS this ll day of - _19 86A . (-. X — Mayor, City Counc1l City of Gcor>Zetnwn PROJECT Karsten Addition -variance -reins+ APPLICANT 5Q \ -i ", emen of f nal nlat LOCATION located across Hwy 81 from Georgetown High G hool REQUEST subdivision ordinance providing an extension of the final plat CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: aPProva . granting of the variance as requested for a three monthextensionofplatapproval, subject to the conditionsoforiginalplatapproval. New expiration date for allplatsshallbeJune11, 1986/ CITY COUNCIL THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN The City of Georgetown City Coun c APPROVES/D $I APPROVES/TABLES/ WITHDRAWS the request listed bel consent) WITNESS OUR HANDS this 11 day of March 19 86 Mayor, City Coun it City of Georgeto n PROJECT Sunny Sidp-variance-rpinc}..tamp f f' APPLICANT Don Grigsby LOCATION located north Off County Road 151 REQUEST variance as required by Section 4 03 part 8 of h plat appr=aj subaaivision ordinance providing for an extension of the final CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: granting of the valiance as requested for a three monthextensionofplatapproval, subject to the conditions oforiginalplatapproval. New expiration date for all platsshallbeJune11,. 1986. CITY COUNCIL THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN The City of Georgetown City Council /APPROVE$/DISAPPROVES/TABLES/ WITHDRAWS the request listed below.sent) WITNESS OUR HANDS this 11 day of March C d'tk M Mayor, City Counci City of Georgetown PROJECT VARIANCE -REINSTATEMENT OF FINAL PLAT -SOUTH GEORGETOWN BUSINESS APPLICANT JAMES D CHRISTY, PARK LOCATION just south of McCoys Building Supp ie Tu z1; REQUEST variance as required by Section 4.03 Part 8 of the subdivisi Ordinance providing an extension of the final plat approval. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: granting of the variance as requested for a three month extension of plat approval, subject to the conditions of original plat approval. New expiration date for all plats shall be June 11, 1986. CITY COUNCIL THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN The City of Georgetown City Councils hPPROVPS /DISAPPROVES /TABLES/ WITHDRAWS the request listed below. (BY CONSENT) WITNESS OUR HANDS this 11 day of March 19 86 Mayor, City Council City of Georgetown PROJECT university Park Section One -Partial Vacation & Resubdivision APPLICANT JSJ Joint Venture plat LOCATION Just east of the proposed Southwestern Blvd. between E 16th and E. 18th Streets. REQUEST Approval of partial vacation & Resubsivision plat for Lots 23 & 24 Block A & Lars , CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: approval by consent of plat subject where applicable to the same conditions under which the original plat was approved. M i I 13 t. 7 ii, CITY COUNCIL THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN The City of Georgetown City Council APPROVES ISAPPROVES/TABLES/ WITHDRAWS the request listed below. (BY CONSENT) WITNESS OUR HANDS this 11 day of March 19 86 Mayor, City Counci City of Georgetown PROJECIRMN Dennis P McCoy Subdivision final plat APPLICANT MCCOY REALTY CORPORATION LOCATION Adjacent to the east side of IH-25 frontage rd. south of its hupprty EE i?erYLot YQunty Rd. 116 ana Includes the existing c oys uildinc REQUEST Final plat approval. Variance for a decrease in the maximum center line radius from 800' to 500' on Fox Dr. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: approved by consent, the final plat, with the following conditions: 1. All ordinance requirements shall be met 2. All drainage requirements shall be met; A drainage facilities maintenance covenant shall be required prior to recordation. 3. Utilities being adequate -Water availability note shall apply 4. A landscape plan shall be submitted in conjunction with subdivision construction plans for designated drainage and landscape easements 5. A water pollution abatement plan.shall be approved by T.W.C. CITY COUNCIL THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN The City of Georgetown City Counc APP 0 DI:S:APPAQ-.'SeTi-ABLEG; 1UXHD&A4-&-the request listed below. I CONSENT) WITNESS OUR HANDS this 11 day of March OdA11! Mayor, City Counci City of Georgetown PROJECT MICKLER PARK -FINAL PLAT APPLICANT G. BRIAN CHRISTIE LOCATION West of Hutto Rd, and just north of Quail Valley Subdivision. side lot lines for the single family units has been real3ested. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. Ordinance requirements being met. . .Requiremehts of the PUD Ordinance shall apply to the multi -family lot. 2. Utilities being adequate: a) The Water Availability note shall apply b) All off-site utility improvements shall be indicated in the construction plans. The applicants participation in the following improvements must be approved prior to recordation: 1. Improvements to water storage facilities for the area 2. Downstream sewer improvements 3. Water distribution system improvements c) Variances to side PUE requirements shall be granted except for those easements required to serve the subdivision as determined during the construction plan review. d) The proposed relocation of the TP & L line and the dedication of appropriate easements shall be resolved prior to recordation 3. Drainage requirements being met. a) The City engineer's review comments must be addressed prior to recordation b) Detailed plans for the revegitation of the floodplain .as required by construction standards, shall be included in the construction plans. 4. An approved Water Pollution Abatement Plan is required by the T.W.C. 5. A.Drainage Facility Maintenance Covenant shall be required. _ 6. Improvements to Hutto Rd. shall be required with the development only in the area around its intersection with Gretchen Parkway. UUv.+ ur QUAIL MEADOW^CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL -PAGE 2 4. Utilities being adequate: a) The water availability note shall apply and b) All off-site water and wastewater improvements shall be indicated on the subdivision construction plans. 5. Previously granted variances shall still apply for: a) Block A lots 6 & 7 to exceed the maximum length to width ratio b) Block A lots 8-10 for right angle lots 6. The variance'to the requirement for minimum 800' centerline radii on secondary collectors shall be granted for the 366' and 624' curves on Kathi Lane. 7. Applicant is hereby notified of the following: a) The applicant's participation in the improvement of sewer lines from Big Country Club Lift station and the lift station itself must be approved by Public Works Division prior to plat recordation. b) The variance from stormwater detention requirements shall be granted subject to staff verification that subdivision construction plans have satisfied per condition number three above. e pai prior to recordation of plat. PARKVIEW PLACE PUD REVISED SITE PLAN CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL -page 2 II. (con.) a. Utility plan shall be revised to meet the 5• Prequirements of the Fire Chief and Public Works. roposed utility connections including electrical, telephone, cable Tv, fire protection, water, andsewershallbeclearlyindicatedontheconstructionandsitedevelopmentplanstocoordinatewithdrainagedesignandlandscapingfeatures. 6. A landscaping plan conforming to ordinancerequirmentsshallbesubmittedwiththeconstructionandsitedevelopmentplans. Plantings within ten feet of PUE's and/or of Public Works. drainage easements be approved by the Division CITY COUNCIL THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN The City of Georgetown City Council APPROVES/DISAPPROVE TABLES/ WITHDRAWS the request listed below. WITNESS OUR HANDS this _I day of — Y 19 86 Mayor, City Council City of Georgetown APPLI 614 Meadowbrook Drive LOCATION northeast corner of the intersection of the San Gabriel Overlooallu ineduowbrookrive REQUEST variance from Section 6.1 General Rules for Yards of the CityZoningurainance CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Heights Section Four. Tabled pending resubmittal of request. M CITY COUNCIL THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN The City of Georgetown City Council APPROVE ISAPPROVES/TABLES/ WITHDRAWS the request listed below. WITNESS OUR HANDS this _ Nay of m(Z 19 86 Mayor, City Counci City of Geor etown PROJECT 'Hui ding Lind Variance -807 College Street APPLICANT Louise C matF+ LOCATION_ Northeast corn r of tle ;,,t -_f-_nn nf o+1, Ct--- & College Street REQUEST Var to aiiow the construction of a detached accessory building CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: approved the granting of variance due to the site restriction created by existing significant trees. CITY COUNCIL THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN The City of Georgetown City Council APPROVES/bISAPPROVES/TABLES/ WITHDRAWS the request listed below. yWITNESSOURHANDSthisudayof17 rah 19 86 Mayor, City Counc 1 City of Ge rc own PROJECT uig ing Line Variance and PUE Variance -140 Ridgecrest Road APPLICANT Jim Caskev LOCATION 140 Ridgecrest road. The intersection of Ridgecrest Rd with Randolph Road. REQUEST variance from zoning ordinance section 2.0203 part I.b. and applicable dedication provisions of Suouivision n at to nilnw a CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: the rear, and side yard setback areas, which are also both dedicated 10' Public Utility Easements. granting ofvariance as requested, subject to applicant filing a covenant indemnfying the City against damages to said structure which result from the encroachment. This covenant shall be approved by City Attorney prior to recordation. 0 CITY COUNCIL THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN The City of Georgetown City Council APPROVES/DISAPPROVES/TABLES/ WITHDRAWS the request listed below. WITNESS OUR HANDS this day of 19 86 Mayof', City Council City of Georgetown PROJECT Building line variance -1257 south main streetAPPLICANTLarueHemberger LOCATION at northeast corner of the intersection of 16th & Main REQUEST Variance from z to allow the construction of a detached accessory buiding some 8' into CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: yard. e require rearYAlsoavariancefrompartl.c. to allow an increase from 30% to approximately32% in the area of the lot covered bystructures. Denial pending resubmittal of request upon resolution of statusoftheallyR.O.W. corssing property. 0 CITY COUNCIL THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN The City of Georgetown City CounciAPPROVES a-T+HA,k`W9 the request listed below. WITNESS UR HANDS this 25 day of March 19 86 Mayor, City Cou cil City of Geor etownPROJECT614Aeadowbrook Dr. Variance -encroachment into Buian ngU etbackAPPLICANTNeilProcter LOCATION Northeast corner of the intersection of the San Overlook and Meadowbrook Drive. REQUEST Variance from Section 2.02.03 (b) Side and Rear Yard Area Regula- tions of the City zoning Ordinance and the dedication provisions of thethesubdivisionplattoallowtoremaintheencroachmentofadetachedCONDITIONSOFAPPROVAL: accessory building some3%11 into the rear PUE and 3" into the rear yard and to allow to remair. the encroaclutient of the primary residence some 10 into the required side yard area of Lot 9, Block K, San Gabriel Heights Section Four. Granting of variance to allow existing encroachments to remain as shown on survey plat submitted. Applicant is notified that Section 6.105 of Zoning Ordinance will continue to apply. This regulation allows repair and remodeling of structures in violation but not reconstruction or structural alteration. Additionally, a condition of granting the variance for the encroachment of the accessory building into the 10 ft. PUE shall be that in the event that the City should ever need to utilize this easement, then the applicant and/or subsequent owner shall cause to be removed this encroachment. CITY COUNCIL THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN The City of Georgetown City Council/TABLES% W11ttR*W-S-the request listed below. - WITNESS OUR HANDS this 2, day of March 1986 Mayor, City Cou it City of Georget wn PROJECT 1700 Leander Street -Variance -Building Line and Yard Requirements APPLICANT Tom Sessums LOCATION South of 17th Street between Leander Street and Railroad St. REQUEST_ Variance from Section 8.302 Rules for Fences of the Zoning Ordinance to allow the construction of a 6' solid screen fence within CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: the required front yard along the west line of a 1.2676 acre parcel. Table the request and request staff to prepare a report on whyenforcementofCityCodeshavenotoccuredonthisproperty. Y CITY COUNCIL THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN The City of Georgetown City Counci APPROVES S the request listed below. WITNESS ODk HANDS this 25 day of march 19 86 L132 If Z1446 Mayor, City Coun it City of Georgeto n PROJECT Tri -Corners -Variance -Reinstatement of Final Plat APPLICANT Tri Corners Joint Venture LOCATION Southwest corner of the intersection of County Road 151 and Hwy 81. REQUEST A variance as required.by Section 4.03 Part 8 of the Subdivision ordinance providing an extension of the final CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: plat approval for Tri -Corners Approval of request and extending final plat approval for three months. The new expiration date shall be June 10,1986 r, CITY COUNCIL THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN The City of Georgetown City Council !PPR ESI-41" DnTsn a% rs-therequest listed below. WITNESS 0 R HANDS this 25 day of March 19 86 im Mayor, City Counc 1 City of Georgetown PROJECT e- APPLICVariance allowin building permit priorANTZaredCororationcomletionosuivision LOCATION At the southwest corner of Booty's Crossing Rd impr men and Williams Dr. REQUEST the granting of a variance form Section 3.05 of the City Subdivision Ordinance to allow the issuance of utility and/or CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: building permits prior to completion of required improvements. Approval of request with the following conditions being met: 1. A performance bond issued to the City of Georgetown will guarantee the completion of all unfinished improvements necessary for City acceptance of subdivision. 2. The City will not issue Certificates of Occupancy, until all subdivision improvements have been completed and accepted by the City of Georgetown Public Works Division. 3. All other criteria the City of Georgetown has fdr issuance of building permits will be met. 4. The fire protection system shall be operational. to 9 CITY COUNCIL CITY OF GEORGETOWN eorgetown City Counci APP OVE / W CANT the request listed below. WITNESS OUR HANDS this 27 day of January, 1987. Mayor, City of Georgetown Project Name STREET 00566 Applicant: Gene Drake Owner: same Request: Approval for rezoning 20' of Lot 2, Block 3, as recorded in Vol 26 Single Family District District. 104 AUSTIN AVE AND THE 100 BLOCK EAST OF ROCK REZONING FROM RS DISTRICT TO C-1 DISTRICT. Project for Lots 1,5,6,7,8, and north Revised City of Georgetown Map page 321. from RS Residential to C-1 Local Commercial Action: Motion to approve first reading of the Ordinance with use restrictions rezoning to C-1 with the stipulation that 2nd reading shall not occur until site plan has been approved by Planning and Zoning Commission. WILLIAMS. LOTT, JUDGE JIM BOUTWELL, SHERIFF TIMOTHYG. MARESH, COUNTY JUDGEINJUDICIALDISTRICT JOHN R. CARTER, JUDGE 2771H JUDICIAL DISTRICT ONNIE WOLBRUECK. DISTRICT CLERK UWARD 1. WALSH, DISTRICT ATTORNEY JOANN BUCHAN. COURT REPORTER (26TH) KENNETH R. MILLER, COURT REPORTER (2777H) IS. MERRILL PERSON, COURT ADMINISTRATOR N W. KURIO, AUDITOR iffini stilt (gmwty Geargetofun, `(Z[exas 78626 October 25, 1985 City of Georgetown Planning and Zoning Commission Re: Riverview Estates To Whom It May Concern: JAMES N. BOYDSTON, COUNTY CLERK BILLY RAY STUBBLEFIELD. COUNTY ATTORNEY MRS. DOROTHY E. JONES, TAX ASS'R a COLLECTOR IRVIN LESCHBER, COUNTY TREASURER COUNTY COMMISSIONERS RON WOOD, PREC, NO. 1, GEORGETOWN WESLEY FOUST, PREC. NO. 2. LIBERTY HILL RAYMOND H. RISTER, PREC. NO. ], GRANGER JERRY L. MEHEVEC. PREC NO. A, TAYLOR The Williamson County Commissioners Court has given preliminary plat approval of the Riverview Estates Subdivision with the flood plain area being broken into single family lots. The Court will only approve the final plat if the plat is in accordance with the preliminary plat layout. The Court does not want the 100 year flood plain area dedicated as an unpreserved lot due to maintenance and liability reasons. Sincerely, 4%z Ron Wood r1 Williamson County Commissioner Precinct #1 to IV Uj_.