HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda CC 10.11.2005I?
Notice of Meeting of the
Governing Body of the
City of Georgetown, Texas
Tuesday, October 11, 2005
The Georgetown City Council will meet on Tuesday, October 11, 2005 at 06:00:00 PM at the City Council
Chambers, 101 E. 7th Street, at the northeast corner of Seventh and Main Streets, Georgetown, Texas.
If you need accommodations for a disability, please notify the city in advance.
An agenda packet, containing detailed information on the items listed below, is distributed to the Mayor,
Councilmembers, and the Georgetown Public Library no later than the Saturday preceding the council
meeting. The library's copy is available for public review.
Please Note: This City Council Meeting will be video taped live without editing and shown on the
local cable channel.
Executive Session
Regular Session to convene and continue Executive Session, if necessary
In compliance with the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, Government Code, Vernon's Texas Codes,
Annotated, the items listed below will be discussed in closed session and are subject to action in the
regular session that follows.
A Sec.551.071: Consultation with Attorney
- Pending or Threatened Litigation
- Legal Advice Regarding Agenda Items and other Matters
- Discussion and possible action regarding the status of good faith negotiations related to the acquisition of right-of-way,
easements, and other property interests at 705 N. Austin Ave. related to the improvement by TXDOT of Austin Avenue
from Leander Road to Williams Drive
Regular Session - To begin no earlier than 06:00 PM
(Council may, at any time, recess the Regular Session to convene an Executive Session at the request of
the Mayor, a Councilmember, or the City Manager for any purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act,
Texas Government Code Chapter 551.)
B Call to Order
C Pledge of Allegiance
D Comments from the dais
- Welcome to Audience and Opening Comments — Mayor Gary Nelon
- Review of new procedure for addressing the City Council
- Announcement of vacancies for two alternate positions on the Building Standards Commission
E Announcements and Comments from City Manager
F Public Wishing to Address Council
- Elizabeth Matthews of Pedernales Electric Cooperative (PEC) regarding PEC activities in the area.
G Action from Executive Session
Statutory Consent Agenda
The Statutory Consent Agenda includes non -controversial and routine items that Council may act on with
City Council Agenda/October 11, 2005
Page 1 of &Q Pages
y
one single vote. A councilmember may pull any item from the Consent Agenda in order that the council
discuss and act upon it individually as part of the Regular Agenda.
H Consideration and possible action to approve the minutes of the Council Workshop on Monday, September
26, and the regular Council Meeting on Tuesday, September 27, 2005 — Sandra D. Lee, City Secretary
I Consideration and possible action to approve a resolution authorizing staff to accept a $20,000 matching
grant from the Urban Forestry Partnership Program — Kimberly Garrett, Assistant Director of Recreation
& Programs, Randy Morrow, Director of Community Services
J Consideration and possible action to approve declaration of used 1998 Ford 150 Pickup as surplus and
authorization for staff to sell to Operations Management International (OMI) for the estimated revenue of
$3,000 — Marsha Iwers, Acting Purchsing Manager and Micki Rundell, Director of Finance and
Administration
K Consideration and possible action to approve a resolution appointing Brian Ortego as a member of the
Georgetown Village Public Improvement District No. 1 Advisory Board — Patricia E. Carls, City
Attorney
L Consideration and possible action to submit the name of Harry Gibbs as a candidate for Director of the
Williamson County Appraisal District — Paul Brandenburg, City Manager
M Consideration and possible action to award the bid for Landscape Repair Services to WE MOW IT PLUS
of Georgetown, Texas and set a budget amount of $35,000.00 — Glenn Dishong, Water Services Manager
and Jim Briggs, Assistant City Manager for Utility Operations
N Consideration and possible action on a Public Review Final Plat for 32.473 acres in the Frederick Foy
Survey, to be known as the Planned Unit Development of Sun City Georgetown, Neighborhood Thirty,
located two miles northeast of the intersection of Del Webb Boulevard and Sun City Boulevard — Melissa
McCollum, AICP, Development Planner and Bobby Ray, AICP, Acting Director of Planning and
Development
0 Consideration and possible action to authorize Paul Brandenburg, Georgetown City Manager, to sign a
contract permitting the Georgetown Public Library to receive direct financial aid in the amount of
$6,367.00 from the Texas State Library and Archives Commission — Eric Lashley, Library Director and
Randy Morrow, Director of Community Services
Legislative Regular Agenda
Council will individually consider and possibly take action on any or all of the following items:
P Consideration and possible action authorizing Library staff to purchase books from Ingram, Inc. in an
amount not to exceed $90,000 for fiscal year 2005-2006 — Eric Lashley, Library Director and Randy
Morrow, Director of Community Services
Q Consideration and possible action to direct staff to apply for the CAPCOG Regional Solid Waste Grant
Program to facilitate the expansion of the City collection station into a fully operational transfer station,
which includes the citizens' drop-off station for recyclables — Kathy Ragsdale, Utility Office Director and
Micki Rundell, Director of Finance and Administration
R Consideration and possible action on the recommended list of proposed UDC amendments for the 05-06
Unified Development Code (UDC) Amendment Process — Bobby Ray, Acting Director of Planning and
Development
S Consideration and possible action to amend the land lease between the City and Williamson County for
approximately 4 acres located on Holly Street, formerly used for the Williamson County Juvenile Detention
Center -- Tom Yantis, Assistant City Manager
T Item Forwarded from the Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation (GTEC)
Consideration and possible action to authorize a First Amendment to Interlocal Agreement with Williamson
County regarding the Georgetown Innerlocp Northeast to reimburse the County for purchase of the
City Council Agenda/October 11, 2005
Page 2 of &Q Pages
proposed Sudduth Drive right-of-way — Mark Miller, Transportation Services Manager and Jim Briggs,
Assistant City Manager for Utility Operations
U Second Readings
1. Second Reading of an ordinance amending the Temporary Service section of Article VII to more
closely reflect cost of service — Kathy Ragsdale, Utility Office Director and Micki Rundell, Director of
Finance and Administration
2. Second Reading of an ordinance amending electric guard light and street light rates and rate
structure to reflect the cost of providing service -- Kathy Ragsdale, Utility Office Director and Micki
Rundell, Director of Finance and Administration
3. Second Reading of an Ordinance changing the name of Hacia Los Lobos Blvd. and the proposed SH
29/Rivery Blvd. Connector Road to "Wolf Ranch Parkway' -- Jim Briggs, Assistant City Manager for
Utility Operations
4. Second Reading of an ordinance amending the existing Chapter 13.32 of the City of Georgetown Code
of Ordinances, entitled "Water and Wastewater Impact Fees"— Glenn Dishong, Water Services
Manager and Jim Briggs, Assistant City Manager for Utility Operations
5. Second Reading of an Ordinance Rezoning 32.473 acres in the Frederick Foy Survey, from AG,
Agricultural District to PUD, Planned Unit Development District, to be known as the Planned Unit
Development of Sun City Georgetown, Neighborhood Thirty, located two miles northeast of the
intersection of Del Webb Boulevard and Sun City Boulevard. -- Melissa McCollum, AICP, Development
Planner and Bobby Ray, AICP, Acting Director of Planning and Development
6. Second Reading of an Ordinance Rezoning of 34.7 acres in the Joseph Fish Survey, from AG,
Agricultural District to RS, Residential Single-family district with a PUD, Planned Unit Development
District, to be known as the Planned Unit Development of Georgetown Village, Section Seven,
located south of Shell Road within Georgetown Village — Bobby Ray, AICP, Acting Director of Planning
and Development
7. Second Reading of an Ordinance Rezoning Lot 5 (South Part), Block 2 of Highland Park Revised,
from RS, Residential Single Family district to C3, General Commercial district located at Highland Drive
and West 24th Street -- Bobby Ray, AICP, Acting Director of Planning and Development
Public Hearings/First Readings
1. Public Hearing regarding designation as a Reinvestment Zone, under Texas Tax Code Chapter 312,
the property generally described as Lot 1, Block 1, of the Park Central Subdivision, Georgetown,
Texas — Mark Thomas, Economic Development Director and Paul Brandenburg, City Manager
2. First Reading of an ordinance approving the final project and financial plan for the Downtown
Georgetown Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone (TIRZ) -- Micki Rundell, Director of Finance and
Administration
3. Public Hearing to consider amending the following sections of the Unified Development Code,
passed and adopted on the 11th day of March, 2003, as follows: Section 10.06, Table 10.06.010;
Section 10.06.030; and Section 16.05 pertaining to marquee signs — David Hall, Director of Inspection
Services and Tom Yantis, Assistant City Manager
4. First Reading of an ordinance amending the following sections of the Unified Development Code,
passed and adopted on the 11th day of March, 2003, as follows: Section 10.06, Table 10.06.010;
Section 10.06.030; and Section 16.05 pertaining to marquee signs — David Hall, Director of Inspection
Services and Tom Yantis, Assistant City Manager
5. First Reading of an ordinance relating to the classifications and number of positions (Strength of
Force) for all City of Georgetown Fire Fighters and Police Officers pursuant to Chapter 143 of the
Texas Local Government Code pertaining to Civil Service -- Kevin Russell, Human Resources Director
and Paul Brandenburg, City Manager
6. First Reading of an ordinance allowing for an increase in rate of deposits to the Texas Municipal
Retirement System by the employees of the City of Georgetown and authorizing and allowing for
City Council Agenda/October 11, 2005
Page 3 of &Q Pages
updated service credits — Kevin Russell, Human Resources Director and Paul Brandenburg, City
Manager
7. First Reading of an ordinance amending the existing Chapter 3.01 pertaining to Personnel Policies to
include Personnel Policies on Employee Transitions and Military Leave Pool and authorizing and
directing the administrative adoption of an amended personnel manual that is consistent with the terms
of this ordinance — Kevin Russell, Human Resources Director and Paul Brandenburg, City Manager
Certiflcate_of Posting
I, Sandra Lee, City Secretary for the City of Georgetown, Texas, do hereby certify that this Notice of
Meeting was posted at City Hall, 113 E. 8th Street, and on the bulletin board located outside of the Council
Chambers, 101 East 7th Street, places readily accessible to the general public at all times, on the
day of , 2005, at , and remained so posted for at least 72 continuous
hours preceding the scheduled time of said meeting.
Sandra Lee, City Secretary
City Council Agenda/October 11, 2005
Page 4 of &Q Pages
fl
Council Meeting Date: October 11, 2005 Item No. AA
AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET
SUBJECT
Consideration and possible action to award the bid for Landscape Repair Services to WE
MOW IT PLUS of Georgetown, Texas and set a budget amount of $35,000.00.
ITEM SUMMARY:
The repair of water and wastewater lines in established utility easements results in damage
to the landscape of property owners including lawn, plantings, and irrigation lines. As part of an
effort to focus the efforts of the Water Services Personnel on the repair of the system versus the
repair of landscape, the outsourcing of landscape repair has been successful.
Bids were received from five (5) out of seventeen (17) companies that were invited to bid.
The low bidder was unable to honor the bid, resulting in the award to the second lowest bidder, WE
MOW IT PLUS in 2005. This item exercises the option to extend the bid for an additional year. This
has been a successful program and staff is now requesting approval to assign additional landscape
repairs to the contractor as was approved in the 2005/2006 budget.
The City has used We Mow It for landscape repair services for the past eight months, and
they have provided excellent service.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS:
Local preference and best value were used in the evaluation of this bid.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Funds in the amount of $35,000.00 are currently available and will be paid from the Water
and Wastewater Operations and Maintenance budget
GUS BOARD RECOMMENDATION:
N/A
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends exercising the option to award the bid for Landscape Repair Services
to WE MOW IT PLUS and setting a budget for the Fiscal Year 2005/2006 of $35,000.00.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Bid Tabulation
2. Best value evaluation
Submitted By: Glenn W. Dishong Jim Briggs,
Water Services Manager Assistant City Manager For Utilities
CITY OF GEORGETOWN
LANDSCAPE REPAIR FOR UTILITY EASEMENTS
BID NO. 25004
COBAR SERVICES GRASS & MORE" GREENER SIDE TCB LANDSCAPE WE MOW IT`
UNIT PRICE UNIT PRICE UNIT PRICE UNIT PRICE UNIT PRICE
Lawn Repair—sod plus labor ($ per sq.ft.)
(Approximately 1,000 sq. ft. per year) 3.00 0.72 0.85 0.60 0.65
per
48.50
Plantings Repair—labor ($ per hour)
(Approximately 50 hours per year) 25.00 27.00 20.00 30.00 30.00
Minimum charge per job site
(Approximately 100 jobs per year) 125.00 65.00 300.00 140.00 90.00
" Bid Award - We Mow It
"Grass & More - withdrew bid before award of bid
No response
Bill's Greenhill
Chapman Services
Tru Green
The Lawn Man
Red & White Greenery
All Seasons Landscape Maintenance
Pride Landscaping Inc.
Georgetown Lawn Specialties
Landscape Texas
Southeriand Irrigation & Landscape
Lynx Systems
CIA Construction Svcs.
BEST VALUE CALCULATIONS
COBAR SERVICES 4W GREENER SIDE '''c[.. TCB LANDSCAPE WE MOW IT
PRICING - 60 pts for lowest price
[Calculation ex. $100,000=60 pts
2nd low bidder- $120,000...100,000 divided by 120,000=.83
.83x60=50 pts for 2nd low bidder, etc.]
BUSINESS HISTORY- maximum 15 pts
- no. yrs in business - 1 pt for ea (up to 6 pts)
-no of business which co. has performed services other than with
City of Georgetown - 1 pt for ea. (up to 6 pts)
-degrees/certifications-1 point for ea. (up to 3)
as
REFERENCES -maximum 15 pts 15 15 15 15
3 reference required with 2 being commercial & 1 business w/commodity purchased
-ability to meet scheduled deadlines - (1 pt)
-quality of work - (2 pts)
-customer service - 0 pt)
- equipment & supplies to carry out job - (1 pt)
Vendor with previous satisfactory work history and in good
standing with City, exempt from providing references and
receive full 15 points.
EMPLOYED PERSONNEL -maximum 10 pts 8 10 10 10
No. of employed staff assigned to City's account
2 pts for ea full time employee (minimum 3 required)
TOTAL POINTS
76
local vendor local vendor
Note 1: In the event of a tie, lowest price is the factor for determining the recommendation of award of the contract
Note 2: We Mow it and Greener Side - exempt from providing references as they
vendors in good standing with City of Georgetown
Note 3: 15 reference points used for calculation purposes references not checked
yet since not in top two best value
REFERENCES
Grass and More -maximum 15 pas
Wohlrab Custom Builders
Hillcrest Custom Homes
Water Zone
(commercial)
(commercial)
(business)
3 reference required with 2 being commercial 8 1 business w/commodity purchased
-ability to meet scheduled deadlines - (1 pt)
good - has always met their deadlines
excellent
-quality of work - (2 pts)
good
excellent on scale 1-10 they are a 10
-customer service - (1 pt)
good
great
- equipment & supplies to carry out job - (1 pt)
yes
yes does what it take to get job done
Notes:
maintains their office and other jobs he bid on
can't say enough good things about
Grass 8 More has done business w/Water Zone
small operation - sometimes have to leave message but
this co. - morally and ethically run
3.4 years, bills are paid on time,
always call back
operation always fair. They do all
purchases both residential & commercial supplies
Has also done personal sprinkler work for
the landscaping for Hillcrest Homes
no problems at all with Gress B More
Vendor with previous satisfactory work mslory and in good
Wohmab's home - good job
standing with City, exempt from providing relamnc%s and
race. Nil 15 points.
5 points 5 points 5 points
Warranty - irrigation repair one year, plants and grass no warranty, without
irrigation system
Note: We Mow It (2 low bidder) and Greener Side exempt from providing reference as
they are vendors in good standing with Cly of Georgetown
Agenda Item Check List
.._...........
rtt
omm
Financial Impact
Agenda Item: Landscape Repair Services
Agenda Item Subject: Consideration and possible action to award the bid for Landscape
Repair Services to WE MOW IT PLUS of Georgetown, Texas and set
a budget amount of $35,000.00
Is this a Capital Improvement Yes 0 No
Project:
Council Date: 10/11/2005
link to Agenda database => Q
Need Help?
Was it budgeted?
Is it within the approved budgeted amount?
If not, where is the money coming from?
G/L Account Number
Amount Going to Council
Is there something (budgeted) that won't get
done because you are spending these funds?
If so, please explain.
Will this have an impact on the next year's
budget?
If so, please explain.
Does this project have future revenue
impact?
• Yes , No
• Yes No
660 -108 -5204 -LS and 650 -108 -5204 -LS
$ 35,000.00
Yes • No
Yes • No
Yes 0 No
Year: Department:
W?
Identify all on-going costs (i.e., insurance,
annual maintenance fees, licenses,
operational costs, etc...).
Estimated staff hours:
Cross -divisional impact: Yes 0 No
If so, what division(s)?
Prepared by: Glenn Dishong Date: 10/05/2005
Agenda Item Checklist., Approved on 10/0512005
Approvers
Title
signed
Notified
Received
tatus Changed
Status
Jim Briggs
Assistant City
10/05/2005
10/05/2005
10/05/2005
10/05/2005
Approved
Jose Lara
Manager
10/05/2005
10/05/2005
10/05/2005
10/05/2005
Approved
Utility Financial
Analyst
Approval Cycle Settings
Council Meeting Date: October 11, 2005 Item No.
AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET
SUBJECT:
Consideration and possible action to authorize a First Amendment to Interlocal
Agreement with Williamson County Regarding the Georgetown Innerloop
Northeast (the "Amendment") to reimburse the County for purchase of the proposed
Sudduth Drive right-of-way.
ITEM SUMMARY:
In February 2004, the City entered into an Interlocal Agreement (the "Agreement') with
Williamson County (the "County') concerning construction of the NE Innerloop.
As the project developed, the Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation
("GTEC"), in response to concerns expressed by the Texas Department of Transportation,
determined that a connector road between NE Innerloop and Industrial Park Circle was
necessary to provide an alternative route for ingress and egress to/from the Industrial Park
North Subdivision. Although it was the City's responsibility to acquire the right-of-way and
construct the road, as a cost-saving measure, the County acquired the right-of-way
concurrently with its acquisition of the NE Innerloop right-of-way, since both tracts were
owned by the same landowner, with the intention of conveying it to the City for the same
purchase price at which it was acquired by the County.
The attached proposed Amendment authorizes the City to purchase the Sudduth Drive
right-of-way from the County for $19,600.00, plus closing costs, for its conveyance of the
subject property to the City, consistent with the Agreement.
GTEC Recommendation
At its September 14, 2004 meeting, GTEC recommended budget approval for the
purchase of right-of-way and the construction of a connector road between Industrial Park
Circle and the Northeast Innerloop to be known as Sudduth Drive.
ATTACHMENTS:
Proposed First Amendment to Interlocal Agreement with Williamson County
Regarding the Georgetown Innerloop Northeast
Submitted By: Jim Briggs, Mark
Assistant City Manager
for Utility Operations
Transportation Services
Manager
>`
FIRST AMENDMENT
TO INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH WILLIAMSON
COUNTY REGARDING THE GEORGETOWN INNER LOOP NORTHEAST
This FIRST AMENDMENT TO INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT (the "First
Amendment') is made and entered into effective this day of 2005 by and
between WILLIAMSON COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Texas ("County"), and
the CITY OF GEORGETOWN, a Texas home -rule municipal corporation (the "City").
WHEREAS, on February 24, 2004, City and County entered into that one certain
Interlocal Agreement (the "Original Agreement') for purposes of designing, engineering,
constructing and maintaining the northeast segment of the Georgetown Inner Loop from County
Road 151 to Business 35 (Austin Avenue) at its intersection with Lakeway Drive (the "Project");
and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section I of the Original Agreement, the parties agreed that the
City would acquire the right of way for the Project, the County would construct the Project, and
the County would convey the Project to the City for future ownership and maintenance; and
WHEREAS, as the Project developed, it was determined that additional right-of-way
should be acquired consisting of a 50 -foot -wide strip of roadway to be called "Sudduth Drive" to
connect the subject northeast segment of the Georgetown Inner Loop to Industrial Park Circle, a
map of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "B"; and
WHEREAS, the County, rather than the City, acquired said 50 -foot -wide strip of land to
be called "Sudduth Drive" concurrently with its acquisition of other right of way in an effort to
streamline the acquisition process, as both tracts were owned by the same landowner; and
WHEREAS, it has always been the County's intention to convey the 50 -foot wide strip of
land to be called Sudduth Drive to the City for future construction of the road by the City,
however, the provisions relating to "Sudduth Drive" were not set out in the Original Agreement;
and
WHEREAS, this First Amendment is being executed by the parties to establish the terms
and conditions of the conveyance of ±0.98 acres (42,625.08 square feet) in the Antonio Flores
Survey, A-235, Williamson County, Texas, said 0.098 acres being part of a 6.35 acre tract of land
conveyed by Nettie Sudduth, Joyce Ann Sudduth Andrews and Shirley Sudduth Davis (the
"Sudduth Family") to the County by Correction Special Warranty Deed recorded in Document
2005068319 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas, for the Georgetown Inner
Loop road project and for Sudduth Drive.
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the promises and mutual agreements set
forth herein, the City and County hereby agree as follows:
First Amendment to Interlocal Agreement with Williamson County
Page 1 of 3
Section I, Paragraph 2. of the Original Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:
"2. As consideration for the engineering, design and construction of the
Georgetown Inner Loop Northeast by the County, the City shall acquire the
right-of-way described as the "Kokel Tract" shown on Exhibit "D"
attached to the Original Agreement and the "Higginbotham Tract" shown
on Exhibit "E" attached to the Original Agreement, including related
costs. The City shall also provide all necessary engineering, design and
construction for a 50 -foot -wide strip of roadway consisting of +0.98 acres
(42,625.08 square feet) in the Antonio Flores Survey, A-235, Williamson
County, Texas (the "Sudduth Drive Tract'), said +0.098 acres being part
of a 6.35 acre tract of land conveyed by Nettie Sudduth, Joyce Ann Sudduth
Andrews and Shirley Sudduth Davis (the "Sudduths') to the County by
Correction Special Warranty Deed recorded in Document No. 2005068319
of the Oficial Records of Williamson County, Texas, said +0.098 acre
Sudduth Drive Tract being more fully described by metes and bounds on
Exhibit "A" and by diagram on Exhibit `B" attached to this First
Amendment, except that the County agrees to acquire the Sudduth Drive
Tract concurrently with its acquisition of the right-of-way shown on Exhibit
"C" attached to the Original Agreement, for purposes of connecting the
proposed northeast segment of Georgetown Inner Loop to Industrial Park
Circle provided, however, that within eighteen (18) months following the
County's closing on the acquisition of the Sudduth Drive Tract, the City
agrees to purchase, and the County agrees to grant, sell and convey, the
Sudduth Drive Tract to the City by Special Warranty Deed at the same
purchase price at which it was acquired by the County from the Sudduths,
or $20, 000. 00per acre, for a total payment to the County of $19,600. 00for
the Sudduth Drive Tract. The City shall be responsible for all closing
costs in connection with County' conveyance of the Sudduth Drive Tract to
the City. "
Except as expressly amended above, all other terms and conditions of the Original
Agreement remain in full force and effect. City and County certify that the representations,
warranties and certifications contained in the Original Agreement are true and correct as of the
effective date of this First Amendment and with the same effect as though made at the time of the
Original Agreement.
The parties acknowledge that they have read, understood, and intend to be bound by the
terms and conditions of this First Amendment.
First Amendment to Interlocal Agreement with Williamson County
Page 2 of 3
ty
0
SIGNED this 13 r day of Se p �ern {icy- 2005.
CITY OF GEORGETOWN WILLIAMSON COUNTY
By: By: C? ( �
Gary Nelon, Mayor John Doerfler County Judge
ATTEST: ATTEST:
Sandra D. Lee, City Secretary Nancy RistleCounty Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Patricia E. Carls, Brown & Carls, LLP
City Attorney
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON
Name:
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of 2005,
by John Doerfler, County Judge of Williamson County, a political subdivision of the State of
Texas, on behalf thereof.
Notary Public in and for the State of Texas
STATE OF TEXAS
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON
This instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of 2005,
by Gary Nelon, in his capacity as Mayor of the City of Georgetown, a Texas home -rule municipal
corporation, on behalf of said corporation.
Notary Public in and for the State of Texas
First Amendment to Interlocal Agreement with Williamson County
Page 3 of 3
A
i5
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS
BEING 0.98 of an acre of land situated in the Antonio Flores Survey, Abstract No. 235, in
Williamson County, Texas, said land being a portion of that certain tract of land, called 6.35
acres, as conveyed to Williamson County, Texas, by Correction Special Warranty Deed of record
as Document No. 2005068319 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas. Surveyed
on the ground in the month of October, 2003, under the supervision of Don H. Bizzell,
Registered Professional Land Surveyor, and being more particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at an iron pin set on the north line of that certain tract of land, called 54 Mi,w acres,
as conveyed to Will Williams Sudduth by deed as recorded in Volume 335, Page 566, of the
Deed Records of Williamson County, Texas, being the south line of Lot 10 of Industrial Park
North, a subdivision of record in Cabinet C, Slide 73, of the Plat Records of Williamson County,
Texas, for the Northeast comer of the above -referenced 6.35 acre Williamson County, Texas,
tract, for the Northeast comer hereof, said point being S 690 01' 22" W, 24.84 feet from an iron
pin found marking the Southeast comer of the said Lot 10;
THENCE, along the east line of the said 6.35 acre Williamson County, Texas, tract,
S 200 58' 38" E, 4.73 feet to an iron pin set at the beginning of a curve to the right,_
(Radius = 625.00 feet, Long Chord bears S 40 09' 04" W, 530.81 feet), along the said
curve for an arc distance of 548.22 feet to an iron pin set; S 290 16' 4T' W, 283.94 feet to
an iron pin set and S 15° 51' 44" E, 35.27 feet to an iron pin set for an interior comer of
the said 6.35 acre Williamson County, Texas, tract, for the most southerly comer hereof;
THENCE, along a curve to the right, (Radius = 7579.44 feet, Long Chord bears
N 60" 43' 13" W, 100.00 feet), an arc distance of 100.00 feet to an iron pin set for an interior
comer of the said 6.35 acre Williamson County, Texas, tract, for the most westerly corner hereof;
THENCE, along a westerly line of the said 6.35 acre Williamson County, Texas, tract,
N 74° 25' 18" E, 35.27 feet to an iron pin set; N 290 16' 47" E, 283.94 feet to an iron pin
set at the beginning of a curve to the left, (Radius = 575.00 feet, Long Chord bears
N 4° 09' 04" E, 488.35 feet);
Thence, along the said curve for an arc distance of 504.36 feet to an iron pin set and
N 200 58' 38" W, 4.73 feet to an iron pin set on the north line of the said 54 Mi,. acre
Sudduth tract, being the south line of the said Lot 1.0 of Industrial Park North, for the
most northerly Northwest comer of the said 6.35 acre Williamson County, Texas, tract,
for the Northwest comer hereof;
THENCE, N 69° 01' 22" E, 50.00 feet to the Place of BEGINNING and containing 0.98 of an
acre of land.
STATE OF TEXAS }
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON }
I, Don H. Bizzell, Registered Professional Land Surveyor, do hereby certify that this survey was
made on the ground of the property legally described hereon and is correct, and that there are no
apparent discrepancies, conflicts, overlapping of improvements, visible utility lines or roads in
place, except as shown on the accompanying plat, to the best of my knowledge and belief.
To which, witness haqO and seal at Georgetown, Williamson County, Texas, this the
_ day of 2005, A.D.
20331-1d
EM
P'34�ez_&
Don H. Bizzell
fessio an o. 2218
State of T ,•. F1
Engineering, Inc.
F,pNil•: 151 ]I ]]0'9� I6
a.
EXHIBIT
/' ypf0 IR/CR1' SVAVfY �-1
AHOOMfO LOMS 34AY A -M N20'5838 t
(54Im
.55 c)
Nil Wllfama Sudduth R�6]5
/ tSMZO'w. 335/566 N04'OB
/ \ N
Ill.�SA504
s
At'
E
NM15% '\q`Um�tl'spti� >iV
Isaszsl4'1, cam i9s'A;'d�dP\\n O'
M1 .4
4@
\ I 5sztiE L a1I f
erqq I� J
(54 51
VIII WJ31W/S 6dtlutF 'Q ♦ 1��6n1" �\y�
�y
I—
i r-��'•>m' ai os em @i
P� �SC,\Bt s om
y\ \ � N �
JIX
�I
c�pao� ry� 4
poop p°� c
o
C _
'W'E I
536' I —1 L� _
36' I—
GS]0.81' y�.l
A.545P2'
owl
(54'100 AC)
Will Wlllloma SutlMt6 � A '
}}5/566 — O —
9f. /I OS
i rnrl o�µm.
SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY
FIELD NOTES FOR A PORTION OF THE
WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS TRACT
ANTONIO FLORES SURVEY ABS. No.235
WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS
RaVLaG Wt -05
-W.'. v+n en.Fp.\wle[oa bo.nm\1ouu>ab.^M r�>weMln grtr.e.l
q[a
{q{r
Om
{
]5.81'
N23'1T45'E
ms
oo
F ]58]'
•5BB'48'15•E
i rnrl o�µm.
SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY
FIELD NOTES FOR A PORTION OF THE
WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS TRACT
ANTONIO FLORES SURVEY ABS. No.235
WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS
RaVLaG Wt -05
-W.'. v+n en.Fp.\wle[oa bo.nm\1ouu>ab.^M r�>weMln grtr.e.l
I
Council Meeting Date: October 11, 2005 Item No. U-3
AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET
SUBJECT:
Second reading of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, changing the
name of Hacia Los Lobos Blvd. and the proposed SH 29/Rivery Blvd. connector road to "Wolf
Ranch Parkway".
ITEM SUMMARY:
As part of the consideration for the landowners' donation of the necessary right-of-way and
easements to construct the proposed SH 29/Rivery Blvd. connector road, the City Council authorized
the renaming of the entire length of the existing Hacia Los Lobos Blvd., as well as the proposed
extension thereof known and the proposed SH 29/Rivery Blvd. Connector, to "Wolf Ranch
Parkway", subject to approval of the proposed agreement between the City and the landowners
entitled Agreement Regarding Donation of Right of Way for Connector Road Between SH 29
and Rivery Blvd. (the "Agreement") being considered concurrently herewith.
Upon execution of the Agreement by all parties and approval of a second reading of the proposed
ordinance, Hacia Los Lobos Blvd., as well as the proposed connector road, will be named "Wolf
Ranch Parkway."
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS:
None
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
N/A
COMMENTS:
None
ATTACHMENTS:
Proposed Ordinance
Submitted By: Jim Briggs, Assistant City Manager for Utilities
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, CHANGING THE NAME OF HACIA LOS LOBOS
BLVD. AND THE PROPOSED SH 29/RIVERY BLVD. CONNECTOR ROAD
TO "WOLF RANCH PARKWAY"; PROVIDING A CONFLICT CLAUSE AND
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, on July 12, 2005, as part of its consideration for the landowners'
donation of the necessary right-of-way and easements to construct the proposed SH
29/Rivery Blvd. Connector, the City Council authorized the renaming of the entire length of
the existing Hacia Los Lobos Blvd., as well as the proposed extension thereof known and
the proposed SH 29/Rivery Blvd. Connector, to "Wolf Ranch Parkway'; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that its street addressing and naming policy
allows the renaming of the existing Hacia Los Lobos Blvd., as well as the naming of the
proposed SH 29/Rivery Blvd. Connector, to "Wolf Ranch Parkway", and that doing so is in
the best interest of the citizens of Georgetown.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, THAT:
SECTION 1. The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this ordinance
are hereby found and declared to be true and correct, and are incorporated by reference
herein and expressly made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim. The City Council hereby
finds that this ordinance implements the Transportation Element of the Century Plan -
Policy Plan Element, which states: "Georgetown's transportation system provides for the
safe and efficient movement of traffic, promotes the economic interests of the community,
and adequately serves the needs of individuals'; and further finds that the enactment of
this ordinance is not inconsistent or in conflict with any other Century Plan Policies, as
required by Section 2.03 of the Administrative Chapter of the Policy Plan.
SECTION 2. The City Council of the City of Georgetown hereby changes the name
of the the existing Hacia Los Lobos Blvd., shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto, to "Wolf
Ranch Parkway', and assigns the same name, "Wolf Ranch Parkway", to the proposed
extension thereof, currently known as the proposed SH 29/Rivery Blvd. Connector, shown
on Exhibit "B" attached hereto.
SECTION 3. This ordinance shall be and is hereby declared to be cumulative of all
other ordinances of the City of Georgetown, and this ordinance shall not operate to repeal
or affect any of such other ordinances, except insofar as the provisions thereof might be
inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance, in which event such
conflicting provisions, if any in such other ordinance or ordinances are hereby superseded.
Ordinance No.
Renaming Hacia Los Lobos Blvd. and proposed SH 29IRivery Blvd. Connector to "Wolf Ranch Parkway'
Page 1 of 2
SECTION 4. If any provision of this ordinance or application thereof to any person
or circumstance, shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions, or
application thereof, of this ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision
or application, and to this end the provisions of this ordinance are hereby declared to be
severable.
SECTION 5. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign this ordinance and the City
Secretary to attest. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect in
(10) ten days on and after publication in accordance with the provisions of the Charter of
the City of Georgetown.
PASSED AND APPROVED on First Reading on the day of 2005.
PASSED AND APPROVED on Second Reading on the_ day of
2005.
ATTEST: THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN:
Sandra D. Lee, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Patricia E. Carts, Brown & Carls, LLP
City Attorney
Gary Nelon, Mayor
Ordinance No.
Renaming Hacia Los Lobos Blvd. and proposed SH 29/Rivery Blvd. Connector to "Wolf Ranch Parkway'
Page 2 of 2
BLOCK "A'
LOT I
coxa Ar.."
G'
V BLOCK 'B"
LOT 2
: 16.190 ACRES
N
a/
r.Wn
a � . Y.
?/`.
B L O C K
Iv LOT 4 /
23,SS6 ACRES
rr,OlA®
rn BLOCK "A" ! /
v�
1 LOT 2
I13.266 ACRES
a"1 / / o wr4,enwac.rin
Iriara,® aN•C L 1 \WEI
sw n
' w s
,i WNM EIE'p�ip ,yl.Er .aa {[11Vj ' W
a%�
!RR A
:i I d d `tmi�i i OT �
i LOT 1
lainl�c"r'a A2N AGES— 1 EA A
GEE 6HEE1 3
PLAT OF
i
.r1a; .!'rt MI.*�ERY
'
—• ---fes
RRD
ONE
r•— - --•-- -
- -
y
1
ne.l0.ryr. �1w
/
�alwua
N arrr
/%
BLOCK "A'
LOT I
coxa Ar.."
G'
V BLOCK 'B"
LOT 2
: 16.190 ACRES
N
a/
r.Wn
a � . Y.
?/`.
B L O C K
Iv LOT 4 /
23,SS6 ACRES
rr,OlA®
rn BLOCK "A" ! /
v�
1 LOT 2
I13.266 ACRES
a"1 / / o wr4,enwac.rin
Iriara,® aN•C L 1 \WEI
sw n
' w s
,i WNM EIE'p�ip ,yl.Er .aa {[11Vj ' W
a%�
!RR A
:i I d d `tmi�i i OT �
i LOT 1
lainl�c"r'a A2N AGES— 1 EA A
GEE 6HEE1 3
'RECO NAL PLAT OF / r
VERY %
L
I
F
City of Geoigetotcn. I ex
Rivery to Highway 29
• Connector
Council Meeting Date: October 11, 2005 Item No.
AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET
SUBTECr:
Second Reading of an ordinance of the City of Georgetown, Texas, amending the existing Chapter 13.32 of
the City of Georgetown Code of Ordinances, entitled "Water and Wastewater Impact Fees".
ITEM SUMMARY:
Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code requires that the City's Impact Fee for Water and
Wastewater Service be reviewed at least every five (5) years. The Impact Fees were last reviewed in 2003, at which
time the City Council adopted a policy of review every three (3) years.
An Impact Fee Advisory Committee reviewed the current land use assumptions, capital improvement
plans, and fee calculation methodology used, by HDR Engineering and Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc., for the fee
calculation. The Committee issued its Final Report entitled "2005 Update of Water and Wastewater Impact Fees City of
Georgetown, Texas" in August 2005.
The Impact Fee Advisory Committee has calculated the maximum fees allowable per service unit to be:
$3,324 for water service, and $1,881 for wastewater service. The Committee has also calculated a maximum
allowable fee for wastewater service in the South San Gabriel basin to be $3,114. The Committee has recommended
the imposition of the lesser amount of $2,493 for water service, $1,881 for wastewater service for areas outside the
South San Gabriel basin, and $3,114 for wastewater service within the South San Gabriel basin.
The City Council voted to impose the maximum fees and also to hold the water fee for the 5/8" meter at its
current rate of $1,530.00.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS:
NONE
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Impact Fees for Water and Wastewater utilities will be used for Capital Improvement Projects only.
The South San Gabriel wastewater impact fee will be used for the establishment of wastewater service in the
South San Gabriel service area.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the approval of the ordinance at the Impact Fee levels as recommended.
GUS BOARD RECOMMENDATION:
N/A
COMMENTS:
NONE
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Copy of Ordinance.
Submitted By: Jim Briggs, Micki Rundell,
Assistant City Manager Finance Director
For Utilities
ORDINANCE NO.
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas
Amending Chapter 13.32 of the Code Of Ordinances Relating to
Impact Fees to Revise the Land Use Assumptions; Revise the Impact
Fee Capital Improvements Plan; Revise the Amount of the Impact
Fees; Create a Special Impact Fee Service Area for the South Fork of
the San Gabriel River and Establishing a Special Area Impact Fee for
the South Fork Service Area; Revise the Provisions Relating to the
Time For Assessment And Collection of Impact Fees to be Consistent
with State Law; Including a Severability Clause; Including a Conflicts
Clause; and Providing an Effective Date.
WHEREAS, the Texas Local Government Code, Chapter 395, known as the
'Texas Impact Fee Act' (the "Act') requires a city to update the land use
assumptions and capital improvements plan for impact fee purposes at least every
five (5) years; and
WHEREAS, the City of Georgetown last updated its Impact Fees in 2003;
and
WHEREAS, the City retained the services of qualified professionals
(professional engineers licensed to perform engineering services in the State of
Texas) to update the capital improvements plan and calculate the impact fee in
accordance with the requirements of the Act; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 395.058 of the Act, the City Council
appointed an Impact Fee Advisory Committee to advise and assist the City in the
manner described in Section 395.058 of the Act; and
WHEREAS, the Impact Fee Advisory Committee has completed its study
and issued its final report entitled "2005 Update of the Water and Wastewater
Impact Fees City of Georgetown, Texas", and
WHEREAS, notice of the hearing on the amendments to the land use
assumptions, capital improvements plan, or impact fee was published in the
Williamson County Sun on August 24 and August 28, 2005 in accordance with
Section 395.055 of the Act; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the City Council on September 27,
2005 to discuss the proposed ordinance amending the land use assumptions,
capital improvements plan, or impact fees; and
WHEREAS, after considering the comments of the Impact Fee Advisory
Committee and comments made at the public hearing, the City Council finds that it
Ordinance No.
Revised Impact Fee Ordinance
Page 1 of 10
is in the public interest, and compliant with the Act, to amend Chapter 13.32 as set
forth herein; and
WHEREAS, the caption of this ordinance was printed in the Williamson
County Sun on September 21, 2005, in compliance with the City Charter of the City
of Georgetown; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, THAT:
SECTION 1. The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this
ordinance are hereby found and declared to be true and correct, and are
incorporated by reference herein and expressly made a part hereof, as if copied
verbatim. The City Council hereby finds that this ordinance implements the
following elements of the Century Plan Policy Plan and that the enactment of this
ordinance is not inconsistent or in conflict with any other Century Plan Policies, as
required by Section 2.03 of the Administrative Chapter the Policy Plan:
Policy End 12.00 City owned, sponsored or managed utilities provide
safe, adequate and reliable services to all customers.
Policy End 14.00 All municipal operations are conducted in an efficient
business -like manner and sufficient financial resources for both current and future
needs are provided.
SECTION 2. Section 13.32.010.E., of the City Code of Ordinances, relating
to Definitions, is amended to revise the Definition of "Impact Fee Service Area" and
to add a Definition for "South Fork Service Area" as follows, with no other changes
to the remaining provisions of the section:
"Impact fee service area" means that area within the corporate limits and extraterritorial jurisdiction of the
City to be served by the water and wastewater capital improvements or facilities expansions specified in the
impact fee capital improvements plan, and which includes the South Fork San Gabriel River Service Area.
"South Fork Service Area" means that portion of the Impact Fee Service Area shown on Exhibit A and
more generally described as the natural drainage area for the South San Gabriel River and bounded by the
future Partner Lane, 11135, FM 2243, and SH 29.
SECTION 3: Section 13.32.020 of the City Code of Ordinances, relating to
Land Use Assumptions, is hereby amended and revised to provide as follows:
Ordinance No.
Revised Impact Fee Ordinance
Page 2 of 10
Sec. 1332.020. Land use assumptions
A. The land use assumptions shown in Section 3 of the "2005 Update of the Water and Wastewater
Impact Fees City of Georgetown, Texas" incorporated by reference as if set forth in full, and which was
exhibited and considered at the public hearing on September 27, 2005 are hereby adopted.
B. Said land use assumptions for the City shall be updated at least every five years utilizing the
amendment procedure set forth in the Texas Impact Fee Act.
C. Amendment to the land use assumptions shall incorporate projections of changes in land uses,
densities, intensities and population for the service area over at least a ten-year period.
SECTION 4: Section 13.32.030 of the City Code of Ordinances relating to
"Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Service Areas" is hereby amended and revised
to provide as follows:
Sec. 1332.030. Water and wastewater impact fee service areas.
A There is established an overall water and wastewater Impact Fee Service Area, the boundaries of
which are depicted on the map attached to the ordinance codified in this chapter as Exhibit A on record in
the office of the City Secretary and incorporated in this chapter by reference.
B. Within the Impact Fee Service Area there is established the South Fork Service Area which is
depicted on the map attached to the ordinance codified in this chapter as Exhibit A on record in the office
of the City Secretary and incorporated in this chapter by reference.
C. The boundaries of the water and wastewater Impact Fee Service Area and the South Fork Service
Area may be amended from time to time in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Texas Impact
Fee Act.
SECTION 5: Section 13.32.040 of the City Code of Ordinances, relating to
Impact fee capital improvements plan for water and wastewater facilities" is hereby
amended and revised to read as follows:
Sec. 1332.040. Impact fee capital improvements plan for water and wastewater facilities.
A. The impact fee capital improvements plan for water and wastewater facilities dated August 2005,
on record in the office of the City Secretary, is adopted and incorporated in this chapter by reference.
B. The impact fee capital improvements plan for water and wastewater facilities may be amended
from time to time pursuant to the procedures set forth in the Texas Impact Fee Act.
SECTION 6: Section 13.32.070 relating to "Assessment of Impact Fees" is
hereby amended to correct a scrivener's error in numbering of the sections of that
section as follows:
Sec. 1332.070. Assessment of impact fees.
A. The approval of any subdivision of land or of any new development within the impact fee service
area shall include as a condition of development the assessment of the impact fee applicable to such
development.
Ordinance No.
Revised Impact Fee Ordinance
Page 3 of 10
B. Assessment of the water and wastewater impact fees for any new development shall be made as
follows:
1. For a development which is submitted for approval pursuant to the City's subdivision
regulations following the effective date of the ordinance codified in this chapter, assessment shall
be at the time a preliminary plat is approved by City Council and shall be in the amount of the
assessed fee per service unit then in effect as set forth in Exhibit B, attached to the ordinance
codified in this chapter, on record in the office of the City Secretary, except as provided in
subsection (13)(2), (3) , (4) of this section;
2. For a development for which no plat is required or issued, assessment shall occur at the
time of building permit application. For development for which no building permit is issued,
assessment shall be at the time of utility connect permit application;
3. For a development for which a preliminary plat was approved, but which has expired,
assessment shall occur at the time a new preliminary plat approval is sought;
4. For septic tank cutovers, assessment shall be at the time of utility connect permit application.
C. Following assessment of the impact fee hereunder, the amount of the impact fee per service unit
may not be increased above the assessed fee unless the owner redevelops or seeks approval of new plan
required as a result of an approved development plan expiration.
D. An application for an amended plat made pursuant to Texas Local Government Code Section
212.016 (Vernon) or the City's subdivision rules is not subject to a reassessment of the impact fee.
SECTION 7: Section 13.32.080 of the City Code of Ordinances , relating to
"Computation of Impact Fees" is hereby amended to delete Subsection A in its
entirety and to renumber the remaining subsections as follows:
Sec. 1332.080. Computation of impact fees.
A. Except as provided in Subsection I of this Section 13.32.080, following the filing and acceptance
of a written application for building permit, the City shall compute the impact fee due in the following
manner:
I. The number of service units shall be determined by the size of the water meter purchased or by
evaluation of the ACM at the time of utility connect permit application as hereinabove provided;
2. Service units shall be summed for all meters purchased for the development;
3. Total service units shall be multiplied by the assessed fee per service unit for water or wastewater
service as depicted in Exhibit B attached to the ordinance codified in this chapter and on record in the
office of the City Secretary;
4. All applicable offsets, credits or discounts per service unit allowable under this chapter for water
or wastewater service shall be subtracted from the product derived under subsection (13)(3) of this section.
B. The amount of impact fee due for new development shall not exceed the amount computed by
multiplying the assessed fee for water or wastewater service by the total number of service units generated
by the development.
Ordinance No.
Revised Impact Fee Ordinance
Page 4 of 10
C. Whenever the property owner increases the number of service units for a development, the
additional impact fees collected for such new service units shall be determined based on the assessed fee
and applicable offsets, credits and discounts then in effect and such additional fee shall be collected at the
time the additional meters are purchased.
D. In the event the property owner decreases the number of service units for a development, the
property owner shall be entitled to a refund of the impact fee for impact fees actually paid, but only for the
amounts represented by the decrease in service units based on the assessed fee and offsets, credits or
discounts applicable A the time the fee was paid.
E. Payment of an impact fee in accordance with the terms and conditions of this chapter shall entitle
the payor to receive a credit for same to be used in the event the tap for the property for which the fee is
paid expires and must be repurchased; provided, however, that the impact fee is not refundable upon
expiration of the tap.
F. If the tap or building permit for the property on which an impact fee is paid has expired and a new
application is thereafter filed for the identical property and the number of service units, the impact fee
previously paid satisfies the requirements of this chapter.
G. The impact fee shall attach to the property for which the impact fee was paid and shall not be
transferable to other properties or service units.
H. No request to connect to the water and wastewater system shall be granted and no building permit
shall be issued if the applicant cannot verify payment of the appropriate impact fee and other applicable
fees or if existing facilities do not have actual capacity to provide service to the new connection(s).
I. On an after the effective date of the 2005 ordinance amending this Section, the water impact fee
for 5/8" meters installed for small residential units (i.e., residential units less than 1,200 square feet or air
conditioned/heated space where no automatic landscape irrigation system will be installed) , shall be
$1,530. The wastewater impact fee for 5/8" meters installed for small residential units (as defined and
described herein) shall be calculated as described in subsections A through H of this Section 12.32.080.
SECTION 8: Section 13.32.090 of the City Code of Ordinances , relating to
"Collection of Impact Fees" is hereby amended to amend Subsection A in its
entirety, to delete subsection C, and to renumber the remaining provisions and
provide as follows:
Sec. 1332.090. Collection of impact fees.
A. Impact Fees shall be collected:
(1) at the time the City issues a building permit; or
(2) for land platted outside the corporate boundaries of the City, at the time an application for
a utility connection to the City's water or wastewater system is filed; or
(3) if no building permits are issued, at the time an application is filed for a utility
connection to the City's water or wastewater system
B. Except as otherwise provided by contracts with wholesale customers or other political
subdivisions, no building permit shall be issued until all impact fees have been paid to the City.
C. For a development which has received an approved development plan prior to the effective date of
the ordinance codified in this chapter and for which no re -approval is necessary prior to the purchase of a
water or wastewater tap, impact fees shall be collected at the time of the utility connect permit application.
Ordinance No.
Revised Impact Fee Ordinance
Page 5 of 10
SECTION 9: Section 13.32.100 of the City Code of Ordinances, relating to
"Credits" is hereby amended to revise the references from "Exhibit C" to be
references to "Exhibit B" as follows:
Sec. 1332.100. Credits.
A. In the event that the City requires as a condition of development approval, or otherwise enters into an
agreement with a developer, to have the developer construct, fund or otherwise contribute toward the cost
of a water or wastewater capital improvement or facility expansion identified in the 10 -year Capital
Improvements Plan underlying the maximum fee calculation, the City may provide for reimbursement in
the form of credits against impact fees that would otherwise be due from the development in accordance
with the following.
1. For the capacity share of the project funded by the developer and related to the developer's own
service need and property benefited therefrom, the City shall provide a credit against payment of the full
impact fee due at time of collection. The credit amount shall be equal to the facility's pro -rata capacity cost
per service unit, but in no case shall the unit credit exceed the amount allowed for that facility type in
Exhibit B of this ordinance. Such credits shall only be applicable against the impact fees for the type of
facility (water or wastewater) for which the capital improvement is made.
2. For any oversizing of the facility funded by the developer, the City shall reimburse the developer
in an amount equal to the facility's pro -rata capacity cost per service unit times the number of service units
present in the oversizing portion, but in no case shall the unit cost for the oversizing reimbursement exceed
the amount allowed for that facility type in Exhibit B of this ordinance. If the City determines there is an
adequate fund balance in the appropriate capital recovery fee account, the City will make reimbursement
promptly to the developer upon acceptance of the facility. If an adequate fee fund balance does not
currently exist, the developer's reimbursement for this facility will be fust priority for use of such funds by
the City once the capital recovery fee fund balance grows to an acceptable amount, as determined by the
City in its sole discretion.
B. The City's capital recovery fee credit and oversizing reimbursement policy in this section only applies to
facilities that are included in the 10 -year Capital Improvements Plan and included in the maximum fee
calculation. This section does not apply for reimbursement of other facilities, dedication of site -related
water distribution or wastewater collection facilities required by other ordinances of the City Code, or fees
placed in funds that may be used for the purpose of reimbursing developers for oversizing or constructing
water or sewer mains or lines.
(Ord. 98-73 § 5: Ord. 96-1 § 2 (Art. A) (part))
Ordinance No.
Revised Impact Fee Ordinance
Page 6 of 10
SECTION 11: Exhibit B of Chapter 13.32 relating to Water and Wastewater
Impact Fee per Service Unit, is hereby amended to provide as follows:
EXHIBIT B
WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE PER SERVICE UNIT
Assessed
Impact Fee
Treatment
$
per
ITEM
Service Unit
WATER
Interceptors
$
Supply
$
363
Treatment
$
1,306
Pumping
$
274
Ground Storage
$
225
Elevated Storage
$
211
Transmission
$
941
Allocated Impact Fee Study Cost
$
3
Total Water
$
3,324
WASTEWATER (outside of South Fork Service Area)
Treatment
$
874
Pumping
$
687
Interceptors
$
314
Allocated Impact Fee Study Cost
$
5
Total Wastewater
$
1,881
WASTEWATER (South Fork Service Area)
Treatment
$
874
Pumping
$
687
Interceptors
$
1,547
Allocated Impact Fee Study Cost
$
5
Total Wastewater
$
3,114
TOTAL WATERIWASTEWATER
Outside of South Fork Service Area
$
5,205
South Fork Service Area
$
6,438
Ordinance No.
Revised Impact Fee Ordinance
Page 8 of 10
SECTION 12: Exhibit C of Chapter 13.32 of the City Code of Ordinances
relating to "Assessed Water and Wastewater Impact Fee History (Per Service
Unit) is hereby amended to provide as follows:
EXHIBIT C
ASSESSED WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE HISTORY
(PER SERVICE UNIT)
Development Approval Date Type Water Wastewater
Before October 1, 2003 Non-residential $1,325 $1,098
Before October 1, 2003 Residential $ 825 $ 600
After October 1, 2003 All $2,295 $1,869
And before October 11, 2005
SECTION 13. That all ordinances that are in conflict with the provisions of
this ordinance be, and the same are hereby, repealed and all other ordinances of
the City not in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance shall remain in full
force and effect.
SECTION 14. If any provision of this ordinance or application thereof to any
person or circumstance, shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the
other provisions, or application thereof, of this ordinance which can be given effect
without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this
ordinance are hereby declared to be severable.
SECTION 15. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign this ordinance and
the City Secretary to attest. This ordinance shall become effective in accordance
with the provisions of the Charter of the City of Georgetown.
PASSED AND APPROVED on First Reading on the 27th day of September
2005.
PASSED AND APPROVED on Second Reading on the day of
, 2005.
ATTEST: THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN
EM
Sandra D. Lee, City Secretary
Ordinance No.
Revised Impact Fee Ordinance
Page 9 of 10
Gary Nelon, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Patricia E. Carls, Brown & Carls, LLP
City Attorney
Ordinance No.
Revised Impact Fee Ordinance
Page 10 of 10
Terri Calhoun To: Sandra Lee/City of Georgetown@City of Georgetown
09/16/2005 02:43 PM cc: Laura Wilkins/City of Georgetown@City of Georgetown, Barbara
Lake/City of Georgetown@City of Georgetown, Teri Nalley/COU/City of
Georgetown@City of Georgetown, tcads@brown-carls.com, Jim
Briggs/City of Georgetown@City of Georgetown, Mark Miller/City of
Georgetown@City of Georgetown
Subject: 9/26 and 9/27 agenda captions
9/26 Executive Session
Real Property - Kent Sick will brief Council on Threadgill "counteroffer" re TxDOT/Austin Ave.
maintenance project - Trish Carls
9/27 Regular Session
Consideration and possible action concerning the City's acceptance of a Quit Claim Deed from
Williamson County transferring ownership and maintenance of D.B. Wood Road from
Williamson County to the City. - Jim Briggs
Consideration and possible action concerning the City's acceptance of a Quit Claim Deed from
Williamson County transferring ownership and maintenance of the Georgetown Innerloop East
(SH 29 East to FM 97 1) from the County to the City. - Jim Briggs
Consideration and possible action concerning the City's acceptance of a Quit Claim Deed from
Williamson County transferring ownership and maintenance of CR 265 from Williamson County
to the City. - Jim Briggs
Ordinance amending section 10.12.090 of the Code of Ordinances establishing speed limits on
D.B. Wood Road from FM 2338 (Williams Drive) to State Highway 29 West; providing a
conflict clause; providing a severability clause; providing for publication and establishing an
effective date. - Mark Miller
Ordinance amending section 10.12.090 of the Code of Ordinances establishing speed limits on
the Georgetown hmerloop East from State Highway 29 East to FM 971; providing a conflict
clause; providing a severability clause; providing for publication and establishing an effective
date. - Mark Miller
Consideration and possible action to authorize an agreement with the Wolf Family for the
donation of right-of-way and easements for the proposed construction of a connector road from
Rivery Blvd. to SH 29 West. - Jim Briggs, Trish Carls
Ordinance amending section 10.12.090 of the Code of Ordinances establishing speed limits on
D.B. Wood Road from FM 2338 (Williams Drive) to State Highway 29 West; providing a
conflict clause; providing a severability clause; providing for publication and establishing an
effective date. - Mark Miller
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, changing the name of Hacia
Los Lobos Blvd. and the proposed SH 29/Rivery Blvd. Connector Road to "Wolf Ranch
Parkway'; providing a conflict clause and severability clause; and establishing an effective date. -
Jim Briggs, Trish Carls
Consideration and possible action to authorize a First Amendment to Interlocal Agreement with
Williamson County Regarding the Georgetown Innerloop Northeast to reimburse the County for
purchase of the proposed Sudduth Drive right-of-way. - Mark Miller
Terri Glasby Calhoun, Paralegal
Georgetown Utility Systems
300 Industrial Avenue
Georgetown, TX 78626
(512)930-3558
Direct Line (512) 930-2575
FAX (512)930-3559
See our web site at www.georgetown.org.
The preceding e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that may be confidential,
constitute non-public information, or be protected by privilege. It is intended to be conveyed only to the
designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender
immediately by replying to this message and then delete it from your system. Use, dissemination,
distribution, or reproduction of this message by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be
unlawful under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act: 18 U.S.C. § 2510 - § 2521.
NOTICE OF MEETING
OF MEMBERS OF THE
GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN
AND MEMBERS
OF THE CITY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS TRAINING AND ORIENTATION
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 2006
6:00 P.M.
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER/MUNICIPAL COURT BUILDING
101 E. 7th STREET, GEORGETOWN, TEXAS
An orientation will be held for members of the following listed City Council -appointed Boards and
Commissions:
Airport Advisory Board, Animal Shelter Advisory Board, Arts and Culture Board, Building Standards Commission,
Convention and Visitors Bureau Board, Economic Development Commission, Ethics Review Commission (ERC),
Georgetown Economic Development Corporation (GEDCO), Georgetown Housing Authority (GHA), Georgetown
Transportation Advisory Board (GTAB), Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation (GTEC), Georgetown
Utility Systems Advisory Board (GUS), Historic and Architectural Review Commission (HARC), Georgetown Public
Library Advisory Board, Main Street Advisory Board, Parks and Recreation Board, Planning and Zoning Commission,
and Zoning Board of Adjustment
The Orientation will be conducted on Wednesday, February 22, 2006, at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council
Chambers/Municipal Court Building
AGENDA
1. Welcome and Introductions
2. Responsibilities of Boards and Commission Members
3. Induction into Office
4. Presentation and Training on the following:
a) State Conflict of Interest Laws
b) City Ethics Ordinance
c) Local Government Code Chapter 176 Disclosure Requirements
d) Open Meetings Act (Attorney General DVD)
e) Public Information Act (Attorney General G DVD)
5. Break-out Sessions to meet with individual board liaisons
.............................................................................................................................................
I, Sandra D. Lee, in my capacity as City Secretary for the City of Georgetown, Texas, do hereby certify that the
above Notice of Public Meeting was posted � �on ,�,the bulleti board at the City Hall of the City of Georgetown
Texas, ated at 113 E. 81h reet, oi Cday of a fTZcc4n 2006, at
'clock a.m p.m.'
4—yiye�L�
Sandra D. Lee, City Secretary
Terri Calhoun To:
11/15/2005 04:02 PM cc:
7k7 I I -�,
Subject:
Sandra Lee/City of Georgetown@City of Georgetown
tcarls@brown-carls.com, Laura Wilkins/City of Georgetown@City of
Georgetown, Barbara Lake/City of Georgetown@City of Georgetown,
Teri Nalley/COU/City of Georgetown@City of Georgetown, Shirley
Rinn/Management Services/City of Georgetown@City of Georgetown,
Jim Briggs/City of Georgetown@City of Georgetown, Mike
Mayben/COU/City of Georgetown@City of Georgetown
11/21/05 Executive Session ites - Substation Site Acquisitions
Please put these items on the 11/21/05 Executive Session agenda under deliberation on real estate:
Discussion and possible action concerning the acquisition of +5.24 acres of land located on SE Innerloop
at CR 110 from Williamson County for the construction of a new electric substation.
Discussion and possible action concerning the acquisition of +3.83 acres of land located on CR 116 from
the W.D. Kelley Foundation for the construction of a new electric substation.
Terri Glasby Calhoun, Paralegal
Georgetown Utility Systems
300 Industrial Avenue
Georgetown, TX 78626
(512)930-3558
Direct Line (512) 930-2575
FAX (512) 930-3559
See our web site at www.georgetown.org.
The preceding e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that may be confidential,
constitute non-public information, or be protected by privilege. It is intended to be conveyed only to the
designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender
immediately by replying to this message and then delete it from your system. Use, dissemination,
distribution, or reproduction of this message by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be
unlawful under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act: 18 U.S.C. § 2510 - § 2521.
Laura Wilkins To: Jim Briggs/City of Georgetown@City of Georgetown, Tom Benz/City of
11/16/2005 09:31 AM Georgetown@City of Georgetown, Mark Miller/City of
Georgetown@City, of Georgetown, Jana Kem/City of
G n ec, ne Georgetown@City of Georgetown
cc: Paul Brandenburg/City of Georgetown@City of Georgetown, Barbara
Lake/City of Georgetown@City of Georgetown
Subject: Interlocal Agreement with Round Rock
Per my team meeting notes from yesteday, the Interlocal Agreement with Round Rock went to GUS Board
yesterday. The plan is for it to go to Council in December and then on to Jim Nuse for the January Round
Rock Council meeting.
I checked with Round Rock and their Council meetings in January will be Thursday, January 12th and
Thursday, January 26th. (they meet on the 2nd and 4th Thursdays each month).
If we want to get something on their agenda, the entire packet must go to their Legal Department by
December 27th for the January 12th meeting and by January 11 th for the January 26th meeting.
That means we should have our packet done and over to Mr. Nuse before Christmas if we want to get it
on the January 12th agenda OR that we should have the packet to Mr. Nuse by the end of December or
first week of January for the January 26th meeting.
I will put these dates in my planner so we can remember and hopefully stay on track. If you need me to do
anything, just let me know.
Terri Calhoun To: Sandra Lee/City of Georgetown@City of Georgetown
cc: Laura Wilkins/City of Georgetown@City of Georgetown, Shirley
11/11/2005 10:05 AM Rinn/Management Services/City of Georgetown@City of Georgetown,
Teri Nalley/COU/City of Georgetown@City of Georgetown, Barbara
Lake/City of Georgetown@City of Georgetown, Jimmy
Carranco/COU/City of Georgetown@City of Georgetown
Subject: School Zone Ordinance
This item will go on the November 22 agenda. Jimmy Carranco will present the item in Mark Miller's
absence.
First Reading of an Ordinance amending Section 10.12.090 of the Code of Ordinances relating to
speed limits and speed zones; eliminating the school speed zone on Northwest Blvd. between
Janis Drive and IH -35 Frontage Road; and adopting a school speed zone on Woodlake Drive
between FM 2338 and Wildwood Drive.
I will publish the caption.
The ordinance is attached at the bottom of this email thread
Terri Glasby Calhoun, Paralegal
Georgetown Utility Systems
300 Industrial Avenue
Georgetown, TX 78626
(512)930-3558
Direct Line (512) 930-2575
FAX (512) 930-3559
See our web site at www.georgetown.org.
The preceding e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that may be confidential,
constitute non-public information, or be protected by privilege. It is intended to be conveyed only to the
designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender
immediately by replying to this message and then delete it from your system. Use, dissemination,
distribution, or reproduction of this message by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be
unlawful under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act: 18 U.S.C. § 2510 - § 2521.
---- Forwarded by Terri Calhoun/City of Georgetown on 11/11/2005 10:01 AM ----
Mark Miller To: Tem Calhoun/City of Georgetown@City of Georgetown
11/10/2005 02:25 PM cc: Jimmy Carranco/COU/City of Georgetown@City of Georgetown
Subject: School Zone Ordinance
I will be out of town on the next meeting. Can you send a caption and item to Sandra for me. a couple of
sentences will do. this is fairly simple stuff. Jimmy Carranco can take the item to council. I usually just
put a small map showing the street and darken the area the school zone will be added.
Jimmy can get you that first thing in the morning.
Thanks.
---- Forwarded by Mark Miller/City of Georgetown on 11/10/2005 02:22 PM ---
4 "Yvonnilda Muniz" To: "Mark Miller" <mmiller@georgetowntx.org>
<ymuniz@brown-carls. cc: <tgc@georgetowntx.org>, Trish Cads" <tcads@brown-cads.com>
com> Subject: School Zone Ordinance
11/07/2005 01:16 PM
Mark:
Ir
The caption is ready to be published. Trish said each dept. is responsible for publishing the caption and
getting everything to Sandra. It needs to get to Sandra no later than noon on Friday. If you need any help,
you can ask Tracy.
Just a quick question to refresh my memory - you did tell me you were going to do a traffic study at the
new elementary school, right?
Yvonnilda
Yvonnilda Muniz
Brown & Carls, LLP
106 East 6th Street
Suite 550
Austin, Texas 78701
phone - (512) 472-4845
fax - (512) 472-8403
Ymuniz0brown-carls.com DRAFT
School Zone Ord. 11.7.05.c
KAKASBERG, PATRICK & ASSOCIATES, LP
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
One South Main
Temple, Texas 76501 (254) 773-3731 Fax (254) 773-6667 mail®kpaengineers.com
RICK N. KASBERG, P.E.
R. DAVID PATRICK, P.E.
THOMAS D. VALLE, P.E.
March 2, 2006
Mr. Mark Miller
Transportation Services Manager
City of Georgetown
300 Industrial Avenue
Georgetown, Texas 78626
Re: City of Georgetown
Wolf Ranch Parkway Project
Georgetown, Texas
Dear Mr. Miller:
Attached are the Bid Tabulation Sheets for the bids received at 2:00 PM on Tuesday, February 28,
2006 for the above referenced project.
This project publicly advertised on January 15, 2006 and January 22, 2006. Eleven (11) general
contractors picked up plans for bidding the project and there were eight (8) contractors that bid the
project. The base bids received ranged from $2,048,699.00 to $2,985,106.00 with our estimate
being $2,200,000. We also took add alternate bids for a substantial completion date of December 1,
2006. After tabulating the bids we have concluded that the low bidder is Chasco Constructors,
LTD. out of Round Rock, Texas. They submitted a base bid of $2,048,699.00 and an add alternate
bid of $0.00 to substantially complete the project by December 1, 2006.
We have reviewed the current workload and construction history of Chasco Constructors, LTD. as
well as contacted several references. As a result of our findings and the fact that they have
satisfactorily completed a number of projects for the City of Georgetown, we recommend that a
contract be awarded to Chasco Constructors, LTD. in the amount of $2,048,699.00 including the
add alternate bid. If you have questions, please call.
Sincerely,
il�-4�0
R. David Patrick, P.E.
RDP/rdp
2004-120-30
Agenda Item Check List
rr
Financial Impact
Agenda Item: Wolf Ranch Parkway Award
Agenda Item Subject: Award of a contract to Chasco Contracting for the construction of
Wolf Ranch Parkway connecting 29 and Rivery Boulevard.
Is this a Capital Improvement 9 Yes O No
Project:
Council Date: 03/14/2006
link to Agenda database =>
Need Help?
Was it budgeted? • Yes O No
Is it within the approved budgeted amount? 0 Yes O No
If not, where is the money coming from?
G/L Account Number 400-101-6023-00
Amount Going to Council $ 2,150,000.00
Is there something (budgeted) that won't get O Yes 0 No
done because you are spending these funds?
If so, please explain.
Will this have an impact on the next year's Yes 0 No
budget?
If so, please explain.
Does this project have future revenue Yes • No
impact?
Year: Department:
If so, how?
Identify all on-going costs (i.e., insurance,
annual maintenance fees, licenses,
operational costs, etc...).
Estimated staff hours:
Cross -divisional impact: O Yes • No
If so, what division(s)7
Prepared by: Mark Miller Date: 03/08/2006
Agenda Item Checklist: Approved on 03/08/2006
pprovers
signed
Notified
Received
Status Changed
tatus
Jim Briggs
t City
03/0812006
03/08/2006
3/08/2006
03/08/2006
Approved
Jose Lara
rAssis
03/08/2006
03/08/2006
3/08/2006
03/08/2006
Approved
ancial
Approval Cycle Settings