HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda CC 07.07.2003 WorkshopNotice of Meeting of the
Governing Body of the
City of Georgetown, Texas
Monday, July 7, 2003
The Georgetown City Council will meet on Monday, July 7, 2003 at 04:00:00 PM at the San Gabriel Break
Room, Georgetown Municipal Complex, 300 Industrial Avenue, Georgetown, Texas
If you need accommodations for a disability, please notify the city in advance.
Policy Development/Review Workshop - Call to order at 4:00 p.m.
A Wolf Ranch Development Agreement -- Tom Yantis, Assistant City Manager; Jim Briggs, Assistant City
Manager for Utility Operations; Micki Rundell, Director of Finance and Administration; and Trish Carls, City
Attorney
B Council Calendar
- Special Council Workshop on Impact Fees on July 8, 2003, at 5:00 p.m. in the San Gabriel Room,
Georgetown Municipal Complex, prior to the Regular Council Meeting at 6:00 p.m.
- Regular Council Meeting on Tuesday, July 8, 2003, at 6:00 p.m. in the San Gabriel Room, Georgetown
Municipal Complex
- Special Council Meeting on Wednesday, July 16, 2003, at 5:00 p.m. in the San Gabriel Room,
Georgetown Municipal Complex, to consider action on the Wolf Ranch Development Agreement
- Open House at the Georgetown Municipal Complex on Wednesday, July 23, 2003, from 5:00 p.m. to 7:00
p.m.
Executive Session
In compliance with the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, Government Code, Vernon's Texas Codes, Annotated, the
items listed below will be discussed in closed session and are subject to action in the regular session that follows.
C Sec.551.071 consultation with attorney
- Pending Litigation
- Thomas L. Suarez, Jr. vs. city of Georgetown, Texas, City of Georgetown Police Department, Georgetown Police Sgt.
Kelly Devoll, Georgetown Police OfficerJack Lacey, Matt Painter, Brien Grubbs, Cause No. 03-113-C368 in the 368th
Judicial District Court of Williamson County, Texas
- Matthew Painter and Brian Grubbs, Plaintiffs v. David Morgan, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Chief of
Police of the Georgetown Police Department; Robert Hernandez, Individually and in his Oficial Capacity as Captain of
the Georgetown Police Department; Gary Todd Terbush, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Lieutenant of the
Georgetown Police Department; Georgetown Police Department; and the City of Georgetown, Defendants, Cause No.
A03-CA-014JN, In the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, Austin Division.
- Potential Litigation/Settlement Offers
- John Simmons, d.b.a. Georgetown Aviation Facilities Complaint to FAA
- TXU Gas Company Statewide 2003 Rate Case, Railroad Commission of Texas
- Legal Advice Regarding Agenda Items and other Matters
- Legal issues related to the proposed SIMON Development Agreement and Memorandum of Understanding, and/or
Advanced Funding Agreement for Wolf Ranch Project
Of
I, Sandra Lee, City Secretary for the City of Georgetown, Texas, do hereby certify that this Notice of
Meeting was posted at City Hall, 113 E. 8th Street, a place readily accessible to the general public at all
times, on the day of , 2003, at , and remained so posted for at
least 72 continuous hours preceding the scheduled time of said meeting.
Sandra Lee, City Secretary
City Council Agenda/July 7, 2003
Page 1 of 1 Page
1 0
Notice of Meeting of the
Governing Body of the
City of Georgetown, Texas
Tuesday, July 8, 2003
The Georgetown City Council will meet on Tuesday, July 8, 2003 at 06:00:00 PM at the San Gabriel Room
of the Georgetown Municipal Complex, 300 Industrial Avenue, Georgetown, Texas
If you need accommodations for a disability, please notify the city in advance.
An agenda packet, containing detailed information on the items listed below, is distributed to the Mayor,
Councilmembers, and the Georgetown Public Library no later than the Saturday preceding the council
meeting. The library's copy is available for public review.
Please Note: This City Council Meeting will be video taped live and made available for broadcast
by the local cable company.
Regular Session to convene and continue Executive Session, if necessary
Executive Session
In compliance with the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, Government Code, Vernon's Texas Codes, Annotated, the
items listed below will be discussed in closed session and are subject to action in the regular session that follows
A Sec.551.071 consultation with attorney
- Pending Litigation
- Thomas L. Suarez, Jr vs. city of Georgetown, Texas, City of Georgetown Police Department, Georgetown Police Sgt.
Kelly Devoll. Georgetown Police Officer Jack Lacey, Matt Painter. Brian Grubbs, Cause No. 03-113-C368 in the 368th
Judicial District Court of Williamson County, Texas
- Matthew Painter and Bnan Grubbs. Plaintiffs v. David Morgan, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Chief of
Police of the Georgetown Police Department; Robert Hernandez, Individually and in his Oficial Capacity as Captain of
the Georgetown Police Department; Gary Todd Terbush, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Lieutenant of the
Georgetown Police Department; Georgetown Police Department; and the City of Georgetown, Defendants, Cause No.
A03-CA-014JN, In the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, Austin Division.
- Potential Litigation/Settlement Offers
- John Simmons, d.b.a. Georgetown Aviation Facilities Complaint to FAA
- TXU Gas Company Statewide 2003 Rate Case, Railroad Commission of Texas
- Legal Advice Regarding Agenda Items and other Matters
- Legal issues related to the proposed SIMON Development Agreement and Memorandum of Understanding, and/or
Advanced Funding Agreement for Wolf Ranch Project
Regular Session - To begin no earlier than 6:00 P.M.
(The City Council for the City of Georgetown reserves the right to adjourn into executive session at any time during
the course of this meeting to discuss any of the matters listed below, as authorized by Texas Government Code
Sections 551.071 (Consultation with Attorney), 551.072 (Deliberations about Real Property), 551.073 (Deliberations
about Gifts and Donations), 551.074 (Personnel Matters), 551.076 (Deliberations about Security Devices) and
551.086 (Economic Development).
B Call to Order
C Pledge of Allegiance
D Comments from the dais regarding the following items:
- Welcome to Audience and Opening Comments — Mayor Gary Nelon
- Vacancies on Boards/Commissions — Mayor Gary Nelon
Two vacancies on the Board of Adjustment
One vacancy on the Main Street Advisory Board
City Council Agenda/July 8, 2003
Page 1 of 3 Pages
One vacancy on the Parks and Recreation Board
Announcements and Comments from City Manager
Citizens Wishing to Address Council
- There were no citizens registered to speak to Council.
G Action from Executive Session
Statutory Consent Agenda
The Statutory Consent Agenda includes non -controversial and routine items that Council may act on with
one single vote. A councilmember may pull any item from the Consent Agenda in order that the council
discuss and act upon it individually as partof the Regular Agenda.
H Consideration and possible action to approve the minutes of the Council Meetings on Monday, June 23
and Tuesday, June 24, 2003 — Sandra D. Lee, City Secretary
I Consideration and possible action to authorize an increase in the purchasing limit for purchases of
network servers, software, data communications hardware and supplies from Networking Technologies
Resource Center through the State of Texas catalogue — Dennis Schoenborn, Director of Information
Technology
J Consideration and possible action to authorize the Police Department to apply for the Victim Coordinator
and Liaison Grant (VCLG) through the Office of the Attorney General for the position of Victim Services
Coordinator — Kevin Stofle, Assistant Police Chief and David Morgan, Police Chief
K Requests for Hotel Occupancy Tax (HOT) Funds
1. Consideration and possible action regarding the recommendation by the Convention and Visitors'
Bureau Board for the approval of an allocation of $2000 to the Williamson County Art Guild in
Hotel Occupancy Tax (HOT) funds -- Kent Huntsman, Chair of Convention and Visitors Bureau and
Charlie Walker, Economic Development Director
2. Consideration and possible action regarding the recommendation by the Convention and Visitors'
Bureau Board for the approval of an allocation of $1512 to the Downtown Georgetown
Association in Hotel Occupancy Tax (HOT) funds -- Kent Huntsman, Chair of Convention and
Visitors Bureau and Charlie Walker, Economic Development Director
Consideration and possible action to approve the Resolution regarding TXU Gas Company Satetewide
2003 Rate Case, Railroad Commission of Texas — Jim Briggs, Assistant City Manager for Utility Operations
and Trish Cads, City Attorney
Legislative Regular Agenda
Council will individually consider and possibly take action on any or all of the following items:
M Appointments to Council -Appointed Boards and Commissions
1. Consideration and possible action to approve the appointments of Amber Hardin and Ann Lockhart
to fill vacancies on the Housing Authority and name Bob Horick to fill the position as Chair of the
Housing Authority — Mayor Gary Nelon
2. Consideration and possible action to appoint Amanda Hanson -Emerson and Nicole
Hanson -Emerson to the Youth Advisory Board — Mayor Gary Nelon
N Consideration and possible action to approve a resolution expressing official intent to reimburse costs in
an amount not to exceed $1,800,000, for expansion of the Berry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant, with
proceeds from bonds that will be issued at a later time — Micki Rundell, Director of Finance & Administration
O Consideration and possible action to approve a resolution expressing official intent to reimburse costs of
City Council Agenda/July 8, 2003
Page 2 of 3 Pages
certain Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation (GTEC) Infrastructure projects not to
exceed $1,400,000 with proceeds from bonds that will be issued at a later time — Micki Rundell, Director of
Finance & Administration
P Consideration and possible action on the unanimous recommendation by the Economic Development
Commission that City Council approve the budget program request for a 4A Sales and Use Tax Election
and place the question on the November 2003 ballot for voter approval — Henry Carr, Vice Chair of the
Economic Development Commission; Dr. Ronald Swain, Chair of the Economic Development Commission;
and Charlie Walker, Economic Development Director
Q Second Readings
1. Second Reading of an ordinance amending Chapter 13.32 of the Code of Ordinances relating to
impact fees to include the updated Capital Improvements Plan and the Future Land Use Plan; to
revise the amount of the impact fees and to include in the impact fee calculation, if applicable, a
credit from utility revenues; to revise credits for developer -funded projects; and to update the
provisions pertaining to time for assessment and collection of impact fees to reflect changes in
state law -- Micki Rundell, Director of Finance and Administration and Jim Briggs, Assistant City
Manager for Utility Operations
2. Second Reading of an Ordinance amending the 2002/03 Annual Operating Plan Element
(budget) for various adjustments relating to staff additions in the Police and Economic
Development Divisions, capital projects and geographic information systems contracts — Laurie
Brewer, Controller and Micki Rundell, Director of Finance and Administration
3. Second Reading of an ordinance amending Chapter 8.12 of the Georgetown Municipal Code
relating to "Food Sanitation Regulations" — Trish Carts, City Attorney
4. Second Reading of an ordinance amending Section 2.56.050 of the Georgetown Code of
Ordinances relating to the duties of the Airport Advisory Board -- Councilmember Farley Snell
5. Second Reading of an Ordinance to authorize the establishment and use of a cemetery within two
miles of the City's municipal boundaries pursuant to S.B. 667 — Bobby Ray, Chief Current Planner
and Amelia Sondgeroth, Director of Development Services
6. Second Reading of an Ordinance to Rezone 1.0818 acres, described as Block B of the South San
Gabriel Urban Renewal Tract from MF Multi -Family District to C-1, Local Commercial District
located on the south side of West University Avenue (SH29) between Scenic Drive and Railroad
Street — Bobby Ray, Chief Current Planner and Amelia Sondgeroth, Director of Development
Services
R First Readings
First Reading of an ordinance amending Chapter 10.16 of the Code of Ordinances regarding parking to
establish a "No Parking Zone" on portions of North Austin Avenue — Kevin Stofle, Assistant Police Chief
and David Morgan, Police Chief
Cerfificate of Posting
I, Sandra Lee, City Secretary for the City of Georgetown, Texas, do hereby certify that this Notice of
Meeting was posted at City Hall, 113 E. 8th Street, a place readily accessible to the general public at all
times, on the_ day of , 2003, at , and remained so posted for at
least 72 continuous hours preceding the scheduled time of said meeting.
Sandra Lee, City Secretary
City Council Agenda/July 8, 2003
Page 3 of 3 Pages
0
Council Meeting Date: July B, 2003
AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET
Item No.:_�_'
SUBJECT:rove the Resolution
Consideration and possible action to app
regarding TXU Gas Company Statewide 2003 Rate Case, Railroad
Commission of Texas.
ITEMY
Council to possibly approve the Resolution related to the TX
ase; -electing to have the Railroad
Gas Company 2003 Rate C
Commission of Texas exercise original jurisdiction over Gas Utility
rates, operations, and services within the Incorporatedthose its" of
Georgetown. This will be a contested hearing by
cities
seeking relief from rate increases, but the system rate calculation
results in a rate reduction for most Georgetownrsiden al will
commercial accounts. Any benefits from this proceeding g
benefit our customers without the legal expense of contesting this
filing with the Public Utility Commission (PUC).
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS:
NONE
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
NONE
041
COMMENTS.
NONE
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolutions
Submitted By: vTtish Caris
City Attorney
riggs � U v
tant City Manager for
Utility Operations
Council Meeting Date: July 8, 2003 Item No. T
AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET
An ordinance to revise the City's Water and Wastewater Impact Fees. Second Reading.
ITEM SUMMARY:
Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code requires that the City's Impact Fee for Water and
Wastewater Service be reviewed at least every five years. The Impact Fees were last reviewed in 1998.
An Impact Fee Advisory Committee reviewed the current land use assumptions, capital improvement plans,
and fee calculation methodology used by HDR Engineering and Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc. for the fee
calculation. The Committee issued its Final Report entitled "Update of Water and Wastewater Impact Fees
for the City of Georgetown' in April 2003. The Impact Fee Advisory Committee has calculated the maximum
fees allowable per service unit to be $4,590 for water, and $1,869 for wastewater. The Committee has
recommended the imposition of the lesser amount of $2,295 for water service and $1,869 for wastewater
service, for a combined rate of $4,165. The current combined rate is $1,425 for both water and wastewater.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The new fees would only be applicable to lots platted after this ordinance is adopted. All lots currently platted,
with be assessed the existing combined impact fee of $1,425, therefore, there will be a timing lag for increased
impact fee revenue related to this fee increase
Increase in Impact Fees for Water and Wastewater utilities is expected to result in an additional $4 million over
the next 5 years to be used for Capital Improvement Projects Only. Currently, less than $500,000 annually
is collected in impact fees used to fund W/WW system expansion projects. This increase in fees will redirect
system revenue from system expansion projects, to capital repairs and maintenance for both systems.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the approval of the ordinance at the Impact Fee levels recommended by the Impact Fee
Advisory Committee.
COMMENTS:
All required notices and hearings have been held in accordance with Chapter 395 of the Texas Local
Government Code.
ATTACHMENTS:
Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Ordinance
for Utilities
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS AMENDING
CHAPTER 13.32 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES
RELATING TO IMPACT FEES TO INCLUDE THE
UPDATED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN AND
THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN; TO REVISE THE
AMOUNT OF THE IMPACT FEES AND TO
INCLUDE IN THE IMPACT FEE CALCULATION,
IF APPLICABLE, A CREDIT FROM UTILITY
REVENUES; TO REVISE CREDITS FOR
DEVELOPER FUNDED PROJECTS; AND TO
UPDATE THE PROVISIONS PERTAINING TO
TIME FOR ASSESSMENT AND COLLECTION OF
IMPACT FEES TO REFLECT CHANGES IN STATE
LAW; INCLUDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE;
INCLUDING A CONFLICTS CLAUSE; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Texas Local Government Code, Chapter 395, known as the
"Texas Impact Fee Act" (the "Act") requires a city to update the land use
assumptions and capital improvements plan for impact fee purposes at least every
five (5) years; and
WHEREAS, the City of Georgetown last updated its Impact Fees in 1998;
and
WHEREAS, the City's water supply system and associated Capital
Improvement Plan has recently been updated, and the City has also recently
adopted a Future Land Use Plan; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 395.058 of the Act, the City Council
appointed an Impact Fee Advisory Committee to advise and assist the City in the
manner described in Section 395.058 of the Act; and
WHEREAS, the Impact Fee Advisory Committee has completed its study
and issued its final report entitled "Update of Water and Wastewater Impact Fees
for the City of Georgetown" dated April 2003; and
WHEREAS, notice of the hearing on the amendments to the land use
assumptions, capital improvements plan, or impact fee was published in the
Williamson County Sun on April 30 and May 4, 2003 in accordance with Section
395.055 of the Act; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the City Council on June 10, 2003
to discuss the proposed ordinance amending the land use assumptions, capital
improvements plan, or impact fee; and
WHEREAS, after considering the comments of the Impact Fee Advisory
Committee and comments made at the public hearing, the City Council finds that it
is in the public interest, and compliant with the Act, to (1) address the requirements
of Section 395.014(a)(7) of the Act; (2) amend the time for requiring collection of
impact fees to conform to changes in the Act; (3) amend the provisions relating to
credits to developers in certain situations; (4) to describe the potential impact fee
application area; and (5) revise the amount of the water and wastewater impact
fees.
WHEREAS the City Council has determined that impact fees should be
reviewed every three (3) years; and
WHEREAS, the caption of this ordinance was printed in the Williamson
County Sun on June 4"', 2002, in compliance with the City Charter of the City of
Georgetown; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, THAT:
SECTION 1. The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this
ordinance are hereby found and declared to be true and correct, and are
incorporated by reference herein and expressly made a part hereof, as if copied
verbatim. The City Council hereby finds that this ordinance implements the
following elements of the Century Plan Policy Plan and that the enactment of this
ordinance is not inconsistent or in conflict with any other Century Plan Policies, as
required by Section 2.03 of the Administrative Chapter the Policy Plan:
Policy End 12.00 City owned, sponsored or managed utilities provide
safe, adequate and reliable services to all customers.
Policy End 14.00 All municipal operations are conducted in an efficient
business -like manner and sufficient financial resources for both current and future
needs are provided.
SECTION 2. That the existing Chapter 13.32 of the Code of Ordinances of
the City of Georgetown is hereby repealed in As entirety.
SECTION 3. That there is hereby adopted a new Chapter 13.32 "Water and
Wastewater Impact Fees' of the City Code of the City of Georgetown, Texas, which
new Chapter 13.32 is attached hereto as Exhibit "A," and which exhibit is
incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in full with an effective date of
October 1. 2003.
SECTION 4. That all ordinances that are in conflict with the provisions of
this ordinance be, and the same are hereby, repealed and all other ordinances of
the City not in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance shall remain in full
force and effect.
SECTION 5. If any provision of this ordinance or application thereof to any
person or circumstance, shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the
other provisions, or application thereof, of this ordinance which can be given effect
without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this
ordinance are hereby declared to be severable.
SECTION 6. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign this ordinance and the
City Secretary to attest. This ordinance shall become effective in accordance with
the provisions of the Charter of the City of Georgetown.
PASSED AND APPROVED on First Reading on the day of
.2003.
PASSED AND APPROVED on Second Reading on the day of
'2003.
ATTEST: THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN
in
Sandra D. Lee, City Secretary Gary Nelon, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Patricia E. Carls, Brown & Carls, LLP
City Attorney
CHAPTER 13.32
WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEES
Sec. 13.32.010. General provisions.
A. Purpose. The purpose of the water and wastewater impact fees are to generate revenue for funding or
recouping the cost of capital improvements or facility expansions necessitated by and attributable to new
development.
B. Applicability. This chapter shall be applicable uniformly to new development which occurs within
the water and wastewater service area. For new development which occurs within the boundaries of the
city's wholesale customers or other political subdivisions, the applicability and terms for the assessment and
collection of the impact fee shall be defined by agreement.
C. Authority. This chapter is adopted pursuant to the authority of the Texas Local Government Code
Annotated, Chapter 395 (Vernon 1988), hereinafter to be known as the "Texas Impact Fee Act." The
provisions of this chapter shall not be construed to limit the power of the city to adopt an impact fee
pursuant to any other source of local authority nor to limit the utilization of any other methods or powers
otherwise available for accomplishing the purposes set forth herein.
D. Development Approval. No application for new development shall be approved by the city without
assessment of an impact fee pursuant to this chapter, and no application for building_permit / tap
purchase utility connect permit application shall be approved until the applicant has paid the impact fee
imposed by and calculated hereunder.
E. Definitions. As utilized in this chapter, the following terms shall have the meanings ascribed to them
herein below:
"Approved development plan" means a plan that has received City Council approval following the
subdivision regulations or Unified Development Code process (Concent Plan Preliminary Plat Final Plat
Public Review Final Plat) or is recorded as a platted lot with Williamson County or has legal lot status as
determined by the Unified Development Code.
"Assessment" means a determination of the amount of the impact fee per service unit in effect on the date
or occurrence established for same in this chapter and is the maximum amount that can be charged per
service unit of development.
"Capital improvement" means water supply, treatment and distribution facilities and wastewater collection
and treatment facilities owned and operated by or on behalf of the City having a life expectancy of three or
more years.
"DirestefACM" means the DiFOOOF Of the GityGOffifflUflity ewned utilitiesAssistant City Manager for
Utility Operations or his designee.
"Economic development project" means a new development project which has been designated an
economic development project by the City Council and which has received any one of the following: (a)
Federal funds in the form of loans or grants; (b) City funds in the form of fee waivers, tax incentives,
discounted costs or rates for City services; or (c) any discount or cost reduction not available without
specific action of the City Council.
"Existing development" means the expansion of the capacity of an existing facility that serves the same
function as an otherwise necessary new capital improvement in order that the existing facility may serve
new development. The tern does not include the repair, maintenance, modernization or expansion of an
existing facility to better serve existing development.
Ordinance No.
Exhibit "A"
existing"Final subdivision plat" means the fnap, dFawing OF chaa on whieh is pEevided a subdi%,idef!s plan of
wastewalff eaparity to now development, eitheF f0em exeess eapaeity in existing f4eilifies, from facility
1. GeristFurtien, aequisition eF expansion Of PUbliG faGilitieS OF asseis other than capital improvements or
faciliIies expansions identified in the oapital impfevements plan;
2. Repair-, opeFation OF maintenance of
3. UpgFading, updating, expanding OF Feplaring eidstiRg
4. Upgrading, eF a
S. AdminktFative and :mob oests of the eity; and
6. PFineipal payments and inteMt OF Other finance ehaFges on bonds or eihof indebtedness exeept fo
such payments fnade With FeSpeOt t9 b
iffiff9vement- plan.
"Impast fee" means the viataF And yffl.stpylateF impaet fee as defined in this qeetiAn
"Impact fee" means a charge imposed upon new development in order to generate revenue for funding or
recouping the costs of water and wastewater capital improvements or facility expansions necessitated by or
attributable to new development excluding those site -related facilities required by other ordinances of the
City Code.
"Impact fee capital improvements plan" means the plan required by the Texas Impact Fee Act as adopted
or amended from time to time by the City Council that identifies the capital improvements or facilities
expansions and the associated costs for which impact fees may be assessed.
n17TJ
impact fee capital improvements plan.
"Land use assumptions" means a description of the service area and projections of changes in land uses,
densities, intensities and population in the service area over at least a ten-year period as adopted and
amended from time to time by the City.
"New development" means the subdivision of land; the construction, reconstruction, redevelopment,
conversion, structural alteration, relocation, or enlargement of any structure; or any use or extension of the
use of land, any of which increases the number of service units for water and wastewater service beyond
that which existed during the initial assessment of impact fees if any.. " ineludes the
Ordinance 1,
Exhibit "A"
individual waste disposal system, to the Gitys watOF BF wastewater utility.
"Service unit" means a standardized measure of consumption, use, generation or discharge attributable to
an individual unit of development calculated in accordance with generally accepted engineering or planning
standards for a particular category of capital improvements or facility expansions. For water and
wastewater facilities, the service unit shall constitute the basis for establishing equivalency within various
customer classes based upon the relationship of the continuous duty maximum flow rate in gallons per
minute for a water meter of a given size and type compared to the continuous duty maximum flow rate in
gallons per minute for a three -fourth -inch diameter simple water meter using American Water Works
Association C700-0703 Standards.
�..� .....�. •YY• ...- .-0-.-..-.....
"dap perehaseUtility connect permit application" means the filing with the City of a written application for
a water or wastewater tap and the acceptance of applicable fees therefore by the City. The term 'Yap
pumhaseutiliri connect permit application" shall not be applicable to a master water meter or master
wastewater connection purchased from the City by a wholesale utility customer.
"Wastewater facility" means a capital improvement or facility expansion for providing wastewater service
including but not limited to land or easements, treatment facilities, lift stations, and interceptor mains. The
term does not include wastewater lines or mains which are constructed by developers, the costs of which
are reimbursed from charges paid by subsequent users of facilities and which are maintained in dedicated
trusts. The term "wastewater facilities" also does not include dedication of easement or rights-of-way or
easements or construction or dedication of on-site wastewater collection facilities required by valid
ordinances of the City and necessitated by and attributable to new development.
"Water facility" means improvements for providing water service including but not limited to land or
easements, water supply facilities, treatment facilities, pumping facilities, storage facilities or transmission
mains. The term does not include water lines or mains constructed by developers, the costs of which are
reimbursed from charges paid by subsequent users of the facilities maintained in dedicated trusts. The term
does not include dedication of rights-of-way or easements or construction or dedication of on-site water
distribution facilities required by valid ordinances of the City and necessitated by and attributable to new
development.
"Wholesale customers" means water or wastewater customers of the City s water and/or wastewater
utilities which purchase such utility service at wholesale for resale to their retail customers.
(Ord. 96-1 § 2 (Aft. A) (part))
Sec. 13.32.020. Land use assumptions.
A. The "Future Land Use Plan" are -dated April]anuary
14, 2003, with undated land use assumptions is on record in the office of the City Secretary, are adopted
and incorporated by reference.
Ordinance r
Exhibit "A"
B. Said Future Land Use Plan for the City shall be updated at least every fivefwe
years utilizing the amendment procedure set forth in the Texas Impact Fee Act.
C. Amendment to the land use assumptions shall incorporate projections of changes in land uses,
densities, intensities and population for the service area over at least a ten-year period.
(Ord. 98-73 § 2; Ord. 96-1 § 2 (Art. A) (part))
Sec. 13.32.030. Water and wastewater impact fee service area.
A. There is established a water and wastewater impact fee service area, the boundaries of which are
depicted on the map attached to the ordinance codified in this chapter as Exhibit A on record in the office
of the City Secretary and incorporated in this chapter by reference.
B. The boundaries of the water and wastewater impact fee service area may be amended from time to
time in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Texas Impact Fee Act.
(Ord. 98-73 § 3; Ord. 96-1 § 2 (Art. A) (part))
Sec. 13.32.040. Impact fee capital improvements plan for water and wastewater
facilities.
A. The impact fee capital improvements plan for water and wastewater facilities dated April 2003, on
record in the office of the City Secretary, is adopted and incorporated in this chapter by reference.
B. The impact fee capital improvements plan for water and wastewater facilities may be amended from
time to time pursuant to the procedures set forth in the Texas Impact Fee Act.
(Ord. 98-73 § 4; Ord. 96-1 § 2 (Att. A) (part))
Sec. 13.32.050. Determination of service units.
A. Conversion Table. The number of service units for both water and wastewater service is determined
by the size and type of the water meter purchased for the property in accordance with the following
schedule:
Meter Size (Inch)
I Type
Service Units
'518-X-314
Simple
0 667
314
Simple
1.000
1
Simple
1.667
1-1/2
Simple
3.333
2
Simple
5.333
2
Compound
5.333
2
Turbine
6.667
3
Compound
10.667
3
Turbin7-1
16.000
4
Compound
16.667
4
�— Turbine
28.000
6
compound
33.333
6
Turbine
61.333
Ordinance No. 4
Exhibit "A"
8
Compound
53.333
8
Turbine
106.667
10
Compound
76.667
10
Turbine
166.667
12
Turbine
220.000
Note: Use of 5/8" meter for limited application to small residential units (<1.200 soft of air
conditioned/heated space) where no automatic landscape irrigation system will he installed. Other potential
applications are public facilities such as restrooms in parks.
B. Calculation. Upon application for tap purehaseutility connect permit application, service units shall be
calculated based upon the size of the water meter as set out above.
C. Pressure Anomalies. If a larger or smaller meter is required solely due to abnormally low or high
pressure in the City's main, the DiresteFACM or his designee may adjust the number of service units to
reflect more accurately the flow rate and system pressure conditions.
D. Fire Demand Meters. The number of service units for a fire demand meter shall be determined as
follows:
1. If a fire demand meter composed of a combination of independent units in separate housings
monitoring both fire and domestic usage is purchased for property, the meter size utilized to calculate the
number of service units shall be the dimension of the largest independent unit for the fire demand meter
that provides only domestic service to the property. For purposes of this section, only a simple or
compound meter shall be used to calculate the number of service units represented by the fire demand
meter.
2. If the fire protection capacity of the fire demand meter is routinely utilized for domestic purposes, as
evidenced by the registration of consumption recorded on the City's meter -reading and billing systems, the
owner of the property shall be assessed the current fee for the fire protection capacity that has been
converted to domestic capacity by routing usage.
3. No service units shall be attributed to a tap perehaseutility connect permit dapplication to provide
only fire protection capacity.
E. No Water Meter. Upon application for a building permit for lots for which no water meter has been
purchased, wastewater service units shall be determined by a professional engineer licensed in the State of
Texas subject to the approval of the D4eatfACM.
F. Nonstandard Meter. No adjustment in service units shall be made for water use or fire demand that
falls between standard meter sizes or combinations.
G. Revision of Service Units Designation. The City Council may revise the service units designation in
accordance with the procedures set forth in the Texas Impact Fee Act.
(Ord. 96-1 § 2 (An. A) (part))
Sec. 13.32.060. Impact fees per service unit.
Maximum Allowable Fee. The maximum impact fee per service unit shall be computed by dividing the cost
of water and wastewater capital improvements and facilities expansions necessitated by and attributable to
new development identified in the impact fee capital improvements plan for each category of capital
improvements by the total number of projected service units in the impact fee service area based upon the
Ordinance 1
Exhibit "A"
land use assumptions, and then may be adjusted to reflect a credit, as appropriate, for other non -fee
methods of capital payments referenced in Texas Local Government Code Annotated, Chapter
395.014(a)(7). Maximum impact fees per service unit shall be established for each category of capital
improvements and shall be as set forth in Exhibit B attached to the ordinance codified in this chapter, on
record in the office of the City Secretary, and incorporated in this chapter by reference.
(Ord. 96-1 § 2 (Art. A) (part))
Sec. 13.32.070. Assessment of impact fees.
A. The approval of any subdivision of land or of any new development within the impact fee service
area shall include as a condition of development the assessment of the impact fee applicable to such
development.
, adifed : this chapteron record an the offive of the City gerFetaF5', and ineerpeFated in !his chapteF b)'
referenceQbR0i^�"* ca ri reTr vc rum nr rrn TRIE14
C. Assessment of the water and wastewater impact fees for any new development shall be made as
follows:
1. For a development which is submitted for approval pursuant to the City's subdivision regulations
following the effective date of the ordinance codified in this chapter, assessment shall be at the time afinal
pW-A preliminary plat is obtained -approved by City Council and shall be in the amount of the assessed fee
per service unit then in effect as set forth in Exhibit GB attached to the ordinance codified in this chapter,
on record in the office of the City Secretary, except as provided in subsection (C)(2)- 3 or L41of this
section;
2. For a development for which no plat is required or issued, assessment shall occur at the time of
building permit application. For development for which no building permit is issued, assessment shall be at
the time of utiity connect permit application;
3. For a development for which a plat -plan was approvedwas-obtained, but which plat -plan has expired
after the effeetive date of the WdifiaRGS eedified in this ehapteF, assessment shall occur at the time a new
plat -preliminary plat approval is sought;
4. For septic tank cutovers, assessment shall be at the time of connection to the Gity's wastewatff
faoilitiesutility connect permit application.
D. Following assessment of the impact fee hereunder, the amount of the impact fee per service unit may
not be increased above the assessed fee unless the owner
a new assessment shall eeeuF at the assessed water and wastewateF iFRPaGt fee PeF seFvice unit in effect at
the time of s eh _.,_' - -edevelops or seeks approval of new plan required as a result of an approved
development plan expiration
E. An application for an amended plat made pursuant to Texas Local Government Code Section 212.016
(Vernon 1988) or the City's subdivision rules is not subject to a reassessment of the impact fee.
(Ord. 96-1 § 2 (Art. A) (part))
Sec. 13.32.080. Computation of impact fees.
Ordinance 1,
Exhibit "A"
A. The impact fees due for the new development shall be collected at the time of building permit -gr if
no building permit is required at the time of issuance of the certificate of occupancy but in no event later
than connection to the City's water or wastewater utility system.
B. Following the filing and acceptance of a written application for building permit, the City shall
compute the impact fee due in the following manner:
1. The number of service units shall be determined by the size of the water meter purchased or by
evaluation of the Director ACM at the time of bap purehaseutility connect permit application as hereinabove
provided;
2. Service units shall be summed for all meters purchased for the development;
3. Total service units shall be multiplied by the collested-assessed fee per service unit for water or
wastewater service as depicted in Exhibit B attached to the ordinance codified in this chapter and on record
in the office of the City Secretary;
4. All applicable offsets, credits or discounts per service unit allowable under this chapter for water or
wastewater service shall be subtracted from the product derived under subsection (13)(3) of this section.
C. The amount of impact fee due for new development shall not exceed the amount computed by
multiplying the assessed fee for water or wastewater service by the total number of service units generated
by the development.
D. Whenever the property owner increases the number of service units for a development, the additional
impact fees collected for such new service units shall be determined based on the assessed fee and
applicable offsets, credits and discounts then in effect and such additional fee shall be collected at the time
the additional meters are purchased.
E. In the event the property owner decreases the number of service units for a development, the property
owner shall be entitled to a refund of the impact fee for impact fees actually paid, but only for the amounts
represented by the decrease in service units based on the assessed fee and offsets, credits or discounts
applicable at the time the fee was paid.
F. Payment of an impact fee in accordance with the terms and conditions of this chapter shall entitle the
payor to receive a credit for same to be used in the event the tap for the property for which the fee is paid
expires and must be repurchased; provided, however, that the impact fee is not refundable upon expiration
of the tap.
G. If the tap or building permit for the property on which an impact fee is paid has expired and a new
application is thereafter filed for the identical property and the number of service units, the impact fee
previously paid satisfies the requirements of this chapter.
H. The impact fee shall attach to the property for which the impact fee was paid and shall not be
transferable to other properties or service units.
I. No request to connect to the water and wastewater system shall be granted and no building permit
shall be issued if the applicant cannot verify payment of the appropriate impact fee and other applicable
fees or if existing facilities do not have actual capacity to provide service to the new connection(s).
(Ord. 96-1 § 2 (Att. A) (part))
Sec. 13.32.090. Collection of impact fees.
Ordinance No.
Exhibit "A"
A. For platted properties, the impact per service unit to be collected within the service area at the time of
building permit application (or issuance of a certificate of occupancy if no building permit is required, but
in no event later than connection to the City's water or wastewater utility system) shall be that fee
established by ordinance by the City Council from time to time and shall be an amount less than OF equal 4e
;he fee assessed puFsuant Lein the amount shown on Exhibit B. Save and except for impact fees for utility
service to properties for which no building permit is required, service established by contracts with political
subdivisions or other wholesale customers, water and wastewater impact fees to be collected at the time of
building permit shall be as set forth in Exhibit tr B attached to the ordinance codified in this chapter, on
record in the office of the City Secretary, and made a part of this chapter for all purposes. Impact fees for
utility service to properties for which no building permit is required shall be collected at time of issuance of
a certificate of occupancy, but in no event later than meter purchase.
B. Except as otherwise provided by contracts with wholesale customers or other political subdivisions,
no building permit shall be issued until all impact fees have been paid to the City.
C. For a development which is submitted for approval pursuant to the City's subdivision regulations or
Unified Development Code subsequent to the effective date of the ordinance codified in this chapter,
impact fees shall be collected at the time of building permit /utility connect permit application.
D. For a development which has received final plat ppreva4an approved development plan prior to the
effective date of the ordinance codified in this chapter and for which no reptattiag-re-aoaroval is necessary
prior to the purchase of a water or wastewater tap, impact fees shall be collected at the time of the tap
pwvhaseutility connect cermit aoolication.
-(Ord. 96-1 § 2 (Att. A) (part))
Sec. 13.32.100. Credits.
A. In the event that the City requires as a condition of development approval, or otherwise enters into an
agreement with a developer, to have the developer construct, fund or otherwise contribute toward the cost
of a water or wastewater capital improvement or facility expansion identified in the 10 -year Capital
Improvements Plan underlying the maximum fee calculation, the City may provide for reimbursement in
the form of credits against impact fees that would otherwise be due from the development in accordance
with the followine.
1. For the capacity share of the project funded by the developer and related to the developer's own
service need and property benefited therefrom, the City shall provide a credit against payment of the full
impact fee due at time of collection. The credit amount shall be equal to the facility's pro -rata capacity cost
per service unit, but in no case shall the unit credit exceed the amount allowed for that facility type in
Exhibit C of this ordinance. Such credits shall only be applicable against the impact fees for the type of
facility (water or wastewater) for which the capital improvement is made.
2. For any oversizing of the facility funded by the developer, the City shall reimburse the developer in an
amount equal to the facility's pro -rata capacity cost per service unit times the number of service units
present in the oversizing portion, but in no case shall the unit cost for the oversizing reimbursement exceed
the amount allowed for that facility type in Exhibit C of this ordinance. If the City determines there is an
adequate fund balance in the appropriate capital recovery fee account, the City will make reimbursement
promptly to the developer upon acceptance of the facility. If an adequate fee fund balance does not
currently exist, the developer's reimbursement for this facility will be fust priority for use of such funds by
the City once the capital recovery fee fund balance grows to an acceptable amount, as determined by the
City in its sole discretion.
3—.-Tbe City's capital recovery fee credit and oversizing reimbursement policy in this section only applies
to facilities that are included in the 10 -year Capital Improvements Plan uFideF!5:asand included in the
maximum fee calculation. This section does not apply for reimbursement of other facilities, dedication of
Ordinance 1,
Exhibit "A"
site -related water distribution or wastewater collection facilities required by other ordinances of the City
Code, or fees placed in twst-funds that may be used for the propose of reimbursing developers for
oversizing or constructing water or sewer mains or lines-,
(Ord. 98-73 § 5: Ord. 96-1 § 2 (Att. A) (part))
Sec. 13.32.110. Grandfathered plats.
-A—.For property which has received antra proved development plan €+na4j 4 before the effective date of
the ordinance codified in this chapter and for wheiich the approval has not expired„ no impaoE fee
(Ord. 96-1 § 2 (Att. A) (part))
Sec. 13.32.120. Exceptions and exemptions.
A. Limitation on Modification. Except as provided in this chapter or by contract in existence on the
effective date of the ordinance codified in this chapter, any reduction, change or modification in the amount
or time of payment of the impact fee must be approved by a duly enacted ordinance of the City Council.
B. Private System Connected. An impact fee shall not be assessed on any property that receives service
from a central water supply system owned by a person or an entity other than the City or a wastewater
treatment plant owned by a person or entity other than the City and which water supply system or
wastewater treatment system is to be tied into the City s water and wastewater system.
C. Consumption Meter. The owner of a meter used to monitor water that is utilized exclusively for
consumptive purposes and/or that cannot enter the City wastewater system will not be charged the
wastewater impact fee.
D. Fire Protection Capacity. No fee shall be collected for the purchase of a tap that is utilized to provide
only fine protection capacity.
E. Nothing hereinabove stated shall be construed to alter the terms of a contract with a wholesale
customer of the City regarding the payment of impact fees and shall not be construed to authorize the
payment of impact fees in installments in areas encompassed by such a contract for wholesale service.
F. Exchange. A tap may be exchanged before any water or wastewater service has been received for
another tap without collection of the impact fees established in this chapter if the exchange will result in an
equivalent or lesser number of service units to be utilized on the property for which the tap was originally
Ordinance T
Exhibit "A"
purchased. The number of service units to be exchanged shall be determined in accordance with Section
13.32.050 and shall not be based on the number of units at the time of initial purchase.
G. Economic Development Projects. Pursuant to Chapter 395, Tex. Loc. Gov't Code (Vernon 1999), as
amended, the City Council reserves the right to (1) waive impact fees for new development projects for the
purpose of promoting economic development; and (2) enter into an agreement with a landowner concerning
the payment of impact fees.
(Ord. No. 2001-03 § 2; Ord. No. 2001-16, § 2; Ord. 96-1 § 2 (Att. A) (part))
Sec. 13.32.130. Establishment of accounts.
A. The City s Division of Finance and Administration shall establish separate interest-bearing accounts
clearly identifying the category of capital improvement (i.e., water facilities and wastewater facilities)
within the service area for which the impact fee is collected.
B. Interest earned by each account shall be credited to the account on which it is earned and shall be used
solely for the purposes specified for impact fees as authorized hereinbelow.
C. The City's Division of Finance and Administration shall establish adequate financial and accounting
controls to ensure that impact fees disbursed from the account are utilized solely for the purposes
authorized in this chapter. Disbursement of funds shall be authorized by the City at such times as are
reasonably necessary to carry out the purposes and intent of this chapter; provided, however, that any fee
paid shall be expended within a reasonable period of time, but not to exceed ten years from the date the fee
is deposited into the account.
D. The City's Division of Finance and Administration shall maintain and keep adequate financial
records for each such account, which shall show the source and disbursement of all revenues, which shall
account for all moneys received, the number of service units for which the moneys are received, and which
shall ensure that the disbursement of funds from each account shall be used solely and exclusively for the
provision of projects specified in the impact fee capital improvements plan as system -related capital
projects. The City s Division of Finance and Administration shall also maintain such records as are
necessary to ensure that refunds are appropriately made in accordance with this chapter.
(Ord. 96-1 § 2 (Art. A) (part))
Sec. 13.32.140. Use of proceeds of impact fee accounts.
A. The impact fee collected pursuant to this chapter may be used to finance or to recoup capital
construction costs for water and wastewater facilities identified in the impact fee capital improvements
plan. Impact fees may also be used to pay the principal sum and interest and other finance costs on bonds,
notes or other obligations issued by or on behalf of the city to finance such capital improvements or
facilities expansions.
B. Impact fees collected pursuant to this chapter shall not be used to pay for any of the following
expenses:
1. Construction, acquisition or expansion of capital improvements or assets other than those identified
for the water and wastewater utility in the impact fee capital improvements plan;
2. Repair, operation or maintenance of existing or new capital improvements or facilities expansions;
Ordinance No.
Exhibit "A"
IN
3. Upgrading, expanding or replacing existing capital improvements to serve existing development in
order to meet stricter safety, efficiency, environmental or regulatory standards;
4. Upgrading, expanding or replacing existing capital improvements to serve existing development;
provided, however, that impact fees may be used to pay the costs of upgrading, expanding or replacing
existing capital improvements in order to meet the need for new capital improvements generated by new
development; or
5. Administrative and operating costs of the City.
(Ord. 96-1 § 2 (Aft. A) (part))
Sec. 13.32.150. Refunds.
A. Any impact fee or portion thereof collected pursuant to this chapter which has not been expended
within ten years from the date of payment, shall be refunded, upon application, to the record owner of the
property at the time the refund is paid, or, if the impact fee was paid by another governmental entity, to
such governmental entity, together with interest calculated from the date of collection to the date of refund
at the statutory rate as set forth in Tex. Rev. r:., et... ..,. A a 5069 , 01 Local Gov. Code & 395.025, or
any successor statute.
B. If a refund is due pursuant to subsection A of this section, the refund of unexpended fee payments,
including interest from the date of payment, shall be made to the current record owner or governmental
entity.
C. Upon completion of all the capital improvements or facilities expansions identified in the capital
improvements plan upon which the fee was based, the City shall recalculate the maximum impact fee per
service unit using the actual costs for the improvements or expansions. If the maximum impact fee per
service unit based on actual cost is less than the impact fee per service unit paid, the city shall refund the
difference if such difference exceeds the impact fee paid by more than ten percent. The refund to the record
owner or governmental entity shall be calculated by multiplying such difference by the number of service
units for the development for which the fee was paid, and interest due shall be calculated upon that amount.
D. 1. Upon the request of an owner of the property on which an impact fee has been paid, the City
shall refund such fees if.
a. Existing service is available and service is denied; or,
b. Service was not available when the fee was collected and the city has failed to commence
construction of facilities to provide service within two years of fee payment; or,
c. Service was not available when the fee was collected and has not subsequently been made available
within a reasonable period of time considering the type of capital improvement or facility expansion to be
constructed, but in any event no later than five years from the date of the payment.
2. A refund pursuant to this subsection shall also result in cancellation of the tap permit and the refund
of all building permit fees and/or connection fees previously collected.
3. If the holder of a building permit for property for which a building permit has been obtained
relinquishes the building permit for a refund, a canceled building permit must be presented before the
refund can be made.
E. The city shall refund an appropriate proportion of impact fee payments in the event that a previously
purchased but uninstalled water meter for which the impact fee has been paid is replaced with a smaller
Ordinance t
Exhibit "A"
11
meter, based on the per service unit differential of the two meter sizes and the fee per service unit at the
time of the original fee payment.
F. A petition for refund under this section shall be submitted to the PireetsF 4 CM on a form provided
by the City for such purpose. Within one month of the date of receipt of a petition for refund, the Direew
ACM must provide the petitioner, in writing, with a decision on the refund request, including the reasons
for the decision. If a refund is due to the petitioner, the DiFeetoF-ACM shall notify the City Division of
Finance and Administration and request that a refund payment be made to the petitioner.
(Ord. 96-1 § 2 (Art. A) (part))
Sec. 13.32.160. Updates to plan and revisions of fees.
The City shall review the land use assumptions and impact fee capital improvements plan for water and
wastewater facilities at least every five -three years, with the - five -three year period to commence from the
date of adoption of the impact fee capital improvements plan referenced in this section. The City Council
shall accordingly make a determination of whether changes to the land use assumptions, impact fee capital
improvements plan or impact fees are needed and shall, in accordance with the procedures set forth in the
Texas Impact Fee Act, or any successor statute, either update the fees or make a determination that no
update is necessary.
(Ord. 96-1 § 2 (Att. A) (part))
Sec. 13.32.170. Use of other financing mechanisms.
A. In addition to the use of impact fees, the City may finance water and wastewater capital
improvements or facilities expansions designated in the impact fee capital improvements plan through the
issuance of bonds, through the formation of public improvements districts or other assessment districts, or
through any other authorized mechanism and with any other authorized funds, in such manner and subject
to such limitations as may be provided by law.
B. Except as otherwise provided herein, the assessment and collection of a impact fee shall be additional
and supplemental to, and not in substitution of, any other tax, fee, charge or assessment which is lawfully
imposed on and due against the property.
(Ord. 96-1 § 2 (Att. A) (part))
Sec. 13.32.180. Impact fees as additional and supplemental regulation.
A. Impact fees established by this chapter are additional and supplemental to, and not in substitution of,
any other requirements imposed by the City on the development of land or the issuance of building permits
or the sale of water or wastewater taps or the issuance of certificates of occupancy. Such fees are intended
to be consistent with and to further the policies of the City's Century Plan, impact fee capital improvements
plan, zoning ordinance, subdivision regulations and other City policies, ordinances and resolutions by
which the City seeks to ensure the provision of adequate public facilities in conjunction with the
development of land.
B. This chapter shall not affect, in any manner, the permissible use of property, density of development,
design, and improvement standards and requirements, or any other aspect of the development of land or
provision of public improvements subject to the zoning and subdivision regulations or other regulations of
the City, which shall be operative and remain in full force and effect without limitation with respect to all
such development.
Ordinance No.
Exhibit "A"
12
(Ord. 96-1 § 2 (Att. A) (part))
• Sec. 13.32.190. Relief procedures.
Is
A. Any person who has paid an impact fee or an owner of land upon which an impact fee has been paid
may petition the Council to determine whether any duty required by this chapter has not been performed
within the time so prescribed. The petition shall be in writing and shall state the nature of the unperformed
duty and the request that the act be performed within 60 days of the request. If the Council determines that
the duty is required pursuant to this chapter and is late in being performed, it shall cause the duty to
commence within 60 days of the date of the request and to continue until completion.
B. Any person who has been assessed an impact fee under this chapter may appeal that assessment by
written application to the Director. The City Council may enforce, reduce or modify the assessment, after
providing a public hearing with due notice and opportunity to be heard, if it determines that the assessment
is unwarranted or in error.
C.—FeFeExisting ae•nEsplatted properties with an aaoroved development plan that are extended
municipal water and wastewater serviced will be assessed the then -applicable impact fee at
time of meter purehaseutiliri connect permit application . The new customer in this case shall have the
option of either immediate full payment of the assessed fee or an extended payment plan of 1117 Af the
to 60 months at a current rate of interest as determined
by the Director of Finance, starting with the rneteF purshaseutiliri connect permit aonlication date. If such
partial payments by the customer are more than 30 days overdue, this shall serve as grounds for termination
of water and/or wastewater service.
D. The Council may grant a variance or waiver from any requirement of this chapter, upon written
request by a developer or owner of property subject to this chapter, following a public hearing, and only
upon finding that a strict application of such requirement would, when regarded as a whole, result in
extreme hardship to the applicant and that the grant of the waiver or variance is in the best interest of the
City.
E. If the Council grants a variance or waiver to the amount of the impact fees due for new development
under this section, it shall cause to be appropriated from other City funds the amount of the reduction in the
impact fees to the amount in which the fees would have been deposited.
(Ord. 96-1 § 2 (Att. A) (part))
Ordinance 1,
Exhibit "A"
13
Council Meeting Date: September 22, 2003 Item No.
AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET
Executive Session
JVDJCL11
Consideration of the annual bid for 2003-2004 to various vendors for the Electric System Materials for the City
of Georgetown.
ITEM SUMMARY
On July 31, 2003, sealed bids were received and opened for the Annual Electric System Materials Bid #23023
for the next twelve (12) month period. City staff and the engineering firm responsible for reviewing the bid, McCord
Engineering, of College Station, Texas, recommend that the bids be awarded to the lowest, qualified bidders who
submitted satisfactory and conforming group bids.
The approved vendors meeting specifications include: American Light, Claron Enterprise, Elliott Electric
Supply, Hometown Connections, KBS Electrical Distribution, Inc., Techline, Inc., Wesco, Cannon Technologies,
Fapco, Preferred Sales, US Metering & Tech, Rexel Summers Electric, TEC Utility Supply, TEC Treating Division,
Priester-Melt & Nicholson, Hughes Supply, Priester Supply, Itron, and Dealers Electric.
Based upon the engineer's recommendation, staff recommends Council award the bids for the Annual Electric
System Materials Bid #23023 to the approved bidders as listed above.
GUS BOARD RECOMMENDATION:
Gus Board recommended Council award of the bid to various bidders at their September 16 2003 meeting.
Approved 6-0 (Brown absent)
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Council award of the bids for the Annual Electric System materials Bid #23023 to the
approved bidders as listed above.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Funds will not exceed the 2003-2004 budget for this line item, and will be paid from the Electrical Capital
Projects account and Electrical Maintenance of Utilities account. Estimated expenditures are $1,520,000.00. This
amount is based on prior year usage.
COMMENTS
none
ATTACHMENTS (list individually)
1. Letter from McCord Engineering
2. Bid Tabulation
Submitted
ichael W. Mayben, Energy Service Manager
Jim Briggs, Assistant City Manager
CITY OF GEORGETOWN
ANNUAL ELECTRIC SYSTEM
MATERIALS BID
BID NO. 23023
EXHIBIT A
BID RECOMMENDATION
Item Bidder
Submitted Evaluated
Unit Price ($) Unit Price (S)
,,20-,38 '�Techline, Inc
" D 8
=+20-.39 a.' Techline,Inc.
407_403 A0 ':
20 40 =.Techline, Inc — -- —
ftlo,85;: g5'
.
:C20 41 �Techline. Inc _ _�-0
85_
520-.42o 7echiine, lnc
x£'20 43 Jechline Inc -
1:3 T3 x
1 35, .i1 35'
420 44 i �Techline; Inc.
_ 1'35
-- —.
45.,,$ a7EC Utili Supply —
0.;2 .0:3.
---32
20s�46 ?TEC Utility;Su
0 32 �c:0:31.
^'
20 47- *TEC�UtiIi Su I
0 32 0:3.,
20 48 ' ffechline; Inc. ,,
2.90 2.90
�Techline, Inc
_ - 440
20 -50, :Techline, Inc
, 4 60 4.60;:,
20- 51 ' Techline, Inc.___."'1000,
10 00 : 30100;,
20-52', KBSEledn
#5700 '31.003
• 20- 53 "", Wesco ' .
_ 1 b0 ; 31:00:
—�
120- -54' .Wesco
32:00;
_
20-55-._ Wesco
°� 1.00;;.€�Ki:, 41:00
20 56 :-Techline, Inc —"
,,1,'00-- 1.00
4095.64 4,092.36
Total
Summary of Above
Bidder
Evaluated
Unit Price ($) Unit Price (S)
KBS Electrical
7363003POW473:63
PnestecSu
407_403 A0 ':
TEG Utit Su pl
'
0 0. "
rs>9.3; 6:03
Techline`1rSc. '
";'�fF1'804:�5` X804.95".
Utiliserve,(Hu hesOW
_
196t 96:35
,(1400' 104;00,
4,095.64 4,092.36
Total
e. .
' Liquidated Damages Penalty - (10% or 1.10)
2 F.O.B. Penalty - (4% or 1.04)
'Payment Penalty - (1% or 1.01)
4 Not to Specifications
Exception to minimum quantity requirements
Withdrew bid
r City gives 3% discount to local bidders.
9/812003
J:Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Group 20
GROUP 30 MATERIALS
Conduit and Accessories
SUMMARY OF LOW ITEM BIDDER
Item
Bidder
Submitted Evaluated
Unit PNce(E Unit Price(S
7,30-1.6 KBS Electrically LiMi. 18R!ttEi.S.'24;. z74:
30.2=14`
yWescu?Sn3?l*MV�*,19WO
_ SS�Ot - 1:00
x30•'€5
430=aa6'
1
"KBS Electrical "- •xxyy;,ty„>, 8:1&"°'.530297 :10:29.
Z43Z.7A3''
,. jEC-Ltili 5u " sle't-" Q. A�410Wx TVV " 740',1:08;
:c E 116 Su... ✓'` .SOi X3.'40:.
sTEC1161 I.Su )*-v'0k 'x.941 r.,5%Arttv*3;82t
+'3o -78t.
:7EGUbli '.Su
aTEC Utli -,Su v:
fi�'4.65'>. .;St
i3o,'%10-
:KBS.Electrical,3,`S --.W& :IV%Mr1u.uu:: 0.00.
:rTEC`Atili ?Su ` ks4k'.0 5;" 1,95``-' ..... :89.
"30442*;TECdAl :'Su Ils°tx2.A5%-;9' `V.38
-30-.:03 4TEC;U61" ,5u gmpnwk2:60t: .52:
30� 14,':..rTEC Utili 'Su
30-..'15;!,TEC,U41i Su- C "fi.8"14''/:8.20'." a95
.3416:'. +,TEC�t1tif -Su t
":•7EC�..I. 'SG sv .
d"K�3,+1{.`y"rS14.75�'
_30-17
30- 18:1! TECUb1 -'Su'
,.'
7 30. 19.
•TEC U61i -.Su ..:;?br..$4.50^',.
f33:47y
,30-'20
TEC.Util' -:Su"" "E1'��G
'?<'� ' 75;55': 2 'a++7115.0a
TECMMil' 5
ab`_ - sc'4r1t3298
.30--21:
30- 22"
TEC Utili S 1>nk + ,'
�'t'rga 'P`34.00.. 'x sL' 258,
30- 23
KBS Electrical k st iv
0"
30-24
KBS Electrical';'±
75
--T0.--25".
PnestarSu Co
dMa3A0.
�3 ,26:'t-^ -KBS Electrical iu. iRx4: r;. 025C Y325'
Total
410.86 404.50
Summary of Above
?.Y.?:::Y:!,�. %"' x
'Liquidated Damages Penalty - (10% or 1.10)
2 F.O.B. Penalty - (4% or 1.04)
3 Payment Penalty - (1% or 1.01)
4 Not to Specifications
° Exception to minimum quantity requirements
° Withdrew bid
City gives 3% discount to local bidders.
9/8/2003
Z'/ClienW(Seorgetown/Geo-23.16/Evaluation/Group 30
Evaluated Unit
Bidder
Unit Price (E)
Price IS)
KBSEIeGnwl.
° gtl�ib®iZA96'
Af76.
-
Pdeeter,Su "i
+13'00
,A3A0',
TECA7tilSu... "CJA:`9•
... z' �" ]2510
X20594'
WesOb
,.'
Total
410.86
04.50'.
404.50
?.Y.?:::Y:!,�. %"' x
'Liquidated Damages Penalty - (10% or 1.10)
2 F.O.B. Penalty - (4% or 1.04)
3 Payment Penalty - (1% or 1.01)
4 Not to Specifications
° Exception to minimum quantity requirements
° Withdrew bid
City gives 3% discount to local bidders.
9/8/2003
Z'/ClienW(Seorgetown/Geo-23.16/Evaluation/Group 30
GROUP 40 MATERIALS
25 kV Pad -Mounted Switchgear & Overhead Switches
SUMMARY OF GROUP TOTAL
Bidder
Unit
Bid Price (S)
Evaluated
Unit Price (S)
American Light
Cannon Technologies
Claron Enterprise
60,330.00
60,330.00
Claron Enterprise Aft
Dealers Electrical
53,295.00
7 3,700.00
Fa co
Hometown Connections
Itron
KBS Electrical
53,609.00
10,218.00
KBS Electrical Alt
Preferred Sales
60,520.00
13,718.00
Priester Supply Co.
53,821.10
' 11,245.41
Priester-Melt&Nicholson
TEC Utility Supply
53,696.00
.� 59,065.60
Techline, Inc. Alt
33,704.00
30,826.00
US Meterin & Tech
Utiliserve Hu hes
57,327.02
54,022.02
Wesco
33,704.00
30,826.00
'Liquidated Damages Penalty- (10% or 1.10)
2 F.O.B. Penalty - (4% or 1.04)
3 Payment Penalty - (1 % or 1.01)
` Not to Specifications
5 Exception to minimum quantity requirements
6 Withdrew bid
City gives 3% discount to local bidders.
9/8/2003
Z:/Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Evaluation/Group 40
GROUP 50 MATERIALS
600 V Service Conductors
SUMMARY OF LOW ITEM BIDDER
Summary of Above
Bidder
Submitted
Evaluated
Item
�+:' :+vn^.�s?4W:95' t.'r"'1'.951,.
...$10:22..
Bidder Unit Price (51
Unit Price ($)
4:50,.::1,:
Wesw...i;�"'...
ro«,v .:.rata^5's:?!Ya OS2 ;52,'
'079
:Sp.-2':t:'-Utiliserve H
hes,...t>~�.F - 'e~279'. 1t
.50-.3.A
01EG'U01 Su
l" ^1+ti�.Ha7k,7'r*! ', ..52
:50
X 50.'44.
iWliserva H""
hes '4wi ^-'N!- -: 0:610
180.�'i0AW:61,
_
,50-45 til. aTEC.Util" Su
✓�r A.m+'4v^.>`tl- .L73*a. . .047 46
--50= 6
TEC Utility Supply
.7Y5=,*0.24., k±;:. -0:23
.:'
•.50-J .;
f
TECUtiSu
'Fiii4P '-
0.03
50. 8>TEG1)bI
".
Sux
' 0:.324
50- 9
TECUN Su
.'"0A4i
.yy'31:
'.
030
50-.10.
ILUILiSu
.o+Ra.;Si9�'N+s•.•. :•"SR"'F'
50- 11 ,.
TECU01" Su
r:- i ,'Pe" 2UP.i�23:054
.. .. :96
50- 12 '.
Priester: Su
rv":1.95:
Ci .1.95:
-50- 13
TEC LIM Su
1,10, .0 58
54 14
TEC UtilitySu
""'^ 2 35
_ 2'28
149
50-.15 '.
UHiserve H
hes oda: 144
- 1-75
>,K0.25
50- 16;)* jechone,inc.^s'�;T„„.... -.
0 25
-- x^.024:
SO- 17� TECtUtll” Su
50-.18 r-
Z1tiliserve H”
has e,.. - 133
1 29
'T:.1.29.
::50-. 191.
Altiliserve H
hes ,.
090
; - 0.90
" 50- 20 .
Ubliserve (Hughes)".
9
::d:v.:0.92:
21'-
Utlliserva H
hes ..'. .052
0 r 1
o,v2s:+0.88-
50. 22 -
TE0001' Su
'.:;'. _... _-a --
C
>:50- 23:
THC:UtiI" Su
"
0.78^
.•,......2.35,
°'50- 24
l
7EC.VtiI' Su
of
50-25-.:.
TEC.0
Inc
- n.. �.'.;'-.235
Total
Summary of Above
` Liquidated Damages Penalty - (10% or 1.10)
2 F.O.B. Penalty - (4a/ or 1.04)
5 Payment Penalty - (1% or 1.01)
' Not to Specifications
5 Exception to minimum quantity requirements
5 Withdrew bid
I City gives 3% discount to local bidders.
9/8!2003
Z:/0hents/Georgetown/Geo-23. 16/Evaluation/Group 50
Bidder
Evaluated
UnitPrice (S) Unit Price (S)
PriesterSu
'Co:a�-^v'Wam,•.•:':.,.
�+:' :+vn^.�s?4W:95' t.'r"'1'.951,.
...$10:22..
TEC Utili bu
r4`yw �*__: _.
74•.10.53.. •.
Techline Arid:
Utiliserve
Wesco'
'-
--24
24.43 24.12
Total
` Liquidated Damages Penalty - (10% or 1.10)
2 F.O.B. Penalty - (4a/ or 1.04)
5 Payment Penalty - (1% or 1.01)
' Not to Specifications
5 Exception to minimum quantity requirements
5 Withdrew bid
I City gives 3% discount to local bidders.
9/8!2003
Z:/0hents/Georgetown/Geo-23. 16/Evaluation/Group 50
GROUP 60 MATERIALS
Bare Conductor Items (Overhead)
SUMMARY OF LOW ITEM BIDDER
Summary of Above
' Liquidated Damages Penalty - (10% or 1.10)
Z F.O.B. Penalty - (4% or 1.04)
'Payment Penalty - (11% or 1.01)
' Not to Specifications
e Exception to minimum quantity requirements
e Withdrew bid
' City gives 3% discount to local bidders.
Z:/Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Evaluation/Group 60
9/8/2003
GROUP 70 MATERIALS
Connectors
SUMMARY OF LOW ITEM BIDDER
9/8/2003
Z:/Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Evaluation/Group 70
9/8/2003
Z:/Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Ev21uation/Group 70
Submitted Evaluated
Item
Bidder
Unit Price ($) Unit Price ($)
f#t7O i5.
T)=�Utili Su I'
, .. „• '34:�; .,
� -0.33-r
0
d6[EC�Utih iSu I
v X17
'"'kya�'��` w
0-i37,`+ '.Pnester Mell*& Nictiolsbn ,r j r..w 5 50a 1 :'
6.05:
038
KBS ElectOcal.�y� 1
?2:21
0-j39
KBS Electrical ""x
0°:40
Wesco
t2 85
3
}
70-.42>;
70"43=
TEC UtilitySu 1
%TEGUtili :SuPPY
"0h'�1iIU0'
U.6!
,70-.114
KBS E,ect cal
`
sr' n,94:
70- 45.:
KBS Electncal
" ` vm45 00:;
5':00
70; 46 �
TEC Util ty'Supply
i'18 00a
7:46
70..47,'.
14x&4 x"'��r'a464
70- 48
.KBSElectrcal
Techline, Inc
0-
Tect line; Inc
-------"_
6.50
Techline, Inc
1e 6�
14.50
Techhne:.lnc
12 CO
12.00
k70-52
TechLne, Inc
7092.28
TEC Utili Su>Techline,
4 ,D
-70
Inc
2:20
Techlinejnc
— —
3.01
,70 r56'sf
TEC Utili :Su I ;> a '= 3 10 i _
4:36
70e,r
�,7
. Wesco ws zr
70'58KWesco
70'0
"Priester;S— 1 GG'
.-704,0'
70 61t" IT Utili ' Su
7 ',
70 6.
;TEC Utile 3SU
`«ai3'2�a �t1�2+8pri
70. 63:-
'Iechhne, lnc'
'�'°� ,. . t�Y`i�-P7�� 9x753
70 k64d:i
:•KBS Electrical
29'
,, X525, ����.9:26a
z:70.;�65
�J;echline„Inc,
`.
t00� �
9;A9a
7066
170.7
�fechline„Jnc
BS -E, ” CaiC
1� d9t04 ' .
QO UO.
r„70 58
BS EI Cal
70s69.
S 8ai.
.a
ri7
531
Total
321.31
319.91
9/8/2003
Z:/Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Ev21uation/Group 70
Summary of Above
,,.. <., y,. Y•vv'. "'�+�" • •• �,`�'.,�y Ste' Sei ��Gryt'n� "'
Liquidated Damages Penalty - (10% or 1.10)
2 F.O.B. Penalty - (4% or 1.04)
' Payment Penalty - (1% or 1.01)
' Not to Specifications
Exception to minimum quantity requirements
9 Withdrew bid
' City gives 3% discount to local bidders.
9/8/2003
Z:/Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Evaluation/Group 70
EXHIBIT B
GROUP 80 MATERIALS
Pole Line Hardware Items
SUMMARY OF LOW ITEM BIDDER
9/8/2003
J:Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Group 80
J:Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Group 80
9/8/2003
9/8/2003
J:Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Group 80
Submitted
Evaluated
Bidder
Unit Price ($)
Unit Price ($)
Item
Utilisetve Hu hes ' 't1A + ''re259
00
, ` n 259.00:
80- 76' -Techline
44n 00
-` 449:00;.
.Inc
80 77'` TECUtili
22 ` i'
r 5.'
21:834
28:501
80-r88 TechlineInc - !
;
—_
42.1 07
80- 79 KBS'Electncal __�—
f
�_
68:85'
80 80- KBS Electrical '
I
19 I
��
19:35:
80 81TEC Utili Su --
80 82• :KBS Electrical ":' —!
=I
4.17 I:--4.17-
—
80- 83. .Utiliserve Hu hes _
10 00
9:70
80-,8TEtil.0I
- 1690
16:90'
80-85 Techline,'Inc.
135
1:31-
x80-86,- TEC til Su ly
2.25
2.25
80- 87 Techline, Inc.
__ .
0 70
L.68
,80- 88 TEC Utili Su I •
0.45
0.44
80- 89 TEC Utility Su I _
35
0.34.
80- 90TEC Ltili Supply0
-095
0.-
80-,91 TEC'Utili Su I
0 33
0:32:
80-; 92 7EGUtili Su I
0'90
.87
0.87,-
u I
,80- 93' TEC UtilitySupply.-
,80-
0.99
0.99;
80- 94 ` Techline, Inc.
FSO-94
1 20
1.20:
80-.g5 Techline; Inc — -----
—48.00
48.00;:
-80-96 Techline,.lnc.
5.30
5.30`
80= 97:. KBS: Electrical _ ----
2.05
1.99
80-;98, Utih Su I _
4 75
4.75 i
80- 99 °line lnc.- �_ -- —I
rKBS
35-80
0.95
80= 100 `Electncal -
:901 Electncal
`i
3.79
8G-102 !Techline. Inc —._ _
--
C
6:7.9=.
80 :103 TEC;Util .Su ply — —
,:1 69
ti1#69'
80 104 Techline Inc _
4.00
3s88ry
80=3305 TEC;UGh Su
1390'=
gyp_ 406'. rTechline
�-14 , G
-
k80-:107, Mesco;4
—:1 E 84
----
169
f�0 108, XBS Electr Ca . ' — --
— 18 44
r80 ;109 'Utiliserve l hes
38 2C
-
37415
P
s380 '110 ',TEC Ui I Su ply
p 0!
-,0
0 x111. TEC Utility Supply + ,
-.ti �.
0
0 1 !TEC >Utifi!�S plv='_:,.: _,.
r
U. 1U
V 101
0 x.13' 11 V':u 1 J�
.0 22
r zs t
VCi21=`
0-'41114 TEG, til csu I �
u `t `.. 4
0 ,.115 'TEE tIII _ __ _.'
9/8/2003
J:Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Group 80
9/8/2003
J:Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Group 80
Submitted
Evaluated
Bidder
Unit Price ($)
Unit Price ($)
Item
80= 116:
Wesco" + sn r �hd f
yS u1'�t7'� I�Z7z
80-,.117:-
-TEC"
a
' .r ' �0450 r
_
x ""' a 6:50
5� 6 50;:
X80 .118'
zTechline Inc
-.T30
'e Ak T' x;
0101'1,1'119 '
Techline
10 00
80 120
TEC'Utifi Su I —
� G
� 23 �
'' 23:15::
480 '.12-1,r
Techline, Inc :- _
3 0
r 3 49;
480r�122 :
,l EG Utili Su ly' _ __�
5 A
# + 5-4 9�
80 23:
A".�7
t K BS;Electnca1
' 24;'echline
Inc __—
4C)g"ti0
199900
r 25:
Wechlir a Inc
---_ 0-50
0.50`
jVG,% 6`
Techline, Inc..
0 50
0.50
$ 2j�:.-Techline
Inc -
0.50
D.50`
80 28:Techline,
Inc. _
0.95
:0.95
80-�]29..Techline
Inc
_
024
:n 024
80- 130
Techline Inc
" 024
4 . 0,241
80'131
Techline, Inc.
24
0 24.
80-.;132
,Techline, Inci,
-0 24
0 24:
80- 133
Techline, Inc
0 24
0.24'
80-'134
Techline Inc
0 24
0.24.
778-O--135
Techline; Inc —
0 24
0.24
80 136
Techline Inc _ ---
--
014
80 .137
Techline, Inc .' -----+-
-7--o.24'
0.24"
80- 138
Techline Inc
— —
�" 0 24
-_0:24-
Oi24i80=139
80--139
"Techline Inc. —
-- 0 24
80 ):`140
Techline, Inc
"�—=
0.24i
80--141'-_
'Techline, Inc r
024
,0.24:
80 142 Techline Inc ,M,v;z
0 24
0'24
ectiiie n.
h
0.24
-. '. 0-.24
80 xt44hrfJnC 4°Yr
80-�J�v
echlil7e:
024
0 24
''
80=1 46
;jfEc`hU a
0.24:
:.8024
echli n
0.24
0224p
8 R'. v0 4p
`~�O V�A,+vt't-Plr
a 0
80 49 1
pin
.�P I�D'. ?)ro, r �yv •
180
5 :
1;55a
;!7'E 'til'
5
5300
0 5
Mli�ie
�Ya?Y0:20'
58.
MEl3titi
9/8/2003
J:Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Group 80
Summary of Above
J:Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Group 80
9/8/2003
Submitted
I Evaluated
Bidder
Unit Price ($)
Unit Price (S)
Item
-0,80 57,o
'EE bh +-so .,. 1•„, ? r' ' lJ• + ^x� d 0"10” v19
X80 58:ii
xilltYSUPPY
3
0321
49'•
u pl-
059_ -T-,rEGW, tility supply Z��
4 90
4
QQ tl
60.>.
TEM- tili Supply,
99
9
99 99 -
*180 "
lin
Teche Inc
�`� 10.95=
62
�a80w 62
Techline Inc --
-10,95.
`.5.79'
80--163
Techline Inc<
7._-- 51
80-:.164,
Wesco'
-- 3 20
3:20.
W80=,165
KBS'Electncal
3,89
0. 466,
Techline Inc . ,
4 50
4.50'
(80'''467;
KBS Electrical —
=,. 3 OS
3.05's
;,801;168
KBS Electrical
--- 5.00
5:00'
x80.-169
Wesco -
__ -
1 80
1.75
80- 170
.TEGUtiht Su Iv
___
2 30
2:30,
,,80- 171
-Techline Inc.-
__
2. 30
+. ^, 223.
X80-,:172.
JEC=Utile Su I
5 20
480-:173
KBS-.Electrical'.
1.26'
1f0 =I74
.TEGUtill :Su I '
`
-104
1?Ot>
x280- 175
TEG Utile 'Su I
215
2109;;
X80-176
TEC Utile Su I _ — _
__.�—
'1 4
140;.
,*80=-177,
.TEC UtilitySu I
80- 178
Bid
0 0
6,
TEGUtill Su " 1 ,Ai4^a
TE
- 0 12
t0
.80-180
KBS EIectncaVJechhne, Inc -
I 0 8
„ 0,38<
rp 80=: 81
KBS Ele 4ncal
~0 37-xoo--182
;TEC Utdl Su I'
3'076:
X80"183
--'KBS Electrical !
ig
4,804.35
Total
Summary of Above
J:Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Group 80
9/8/2003
Item I Bidder Unit Price(" � Unit PrIceA
' Liquidated Damages Penalty - (10% or 1.10)
Z F.O.B. Penalty - (4% or 1.04)
3 Payment Penalty - (1% or 1.01)
Not to Specifications
5 Exception to minimum quantity requirements
9/8/2003
J:Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Group 80
GROUP 90 MATERIALS
Cutouts, Lightning Arresters & Switches
SUMMARY OF LOW ITEM BIDDER
Item Bidder
Submitted Evaluated
Unit Price ($) Unit Price ($)
; KBS Electrical.::
.19.35' ::
.19.35.
' - 2 - !Tecline Inc
9
.-.•'
-30:95
,KBS Electrical
. C� ;'�'.' - 228.50
228.50
-TEC-Util' Su
85.00. ^ :-
: 82.45>
.90."'4','
..90-1 5,.: ; :Techline Inc`.-:'
- 41.00 .,
x41.00,
:'KBS Electrical"
-::2:60
-. 2.60'
':KBS Eledridl':
- `:3:35.1
:.3.35
90.`.81 . `KBS Electric:
- 2.58_
2.58
9 'KBSEledncal
.3.35
3.35
' 90..106 , KBS Electrical
.:'3.22 -
3.22
90--14':v. KBS Electrical
:2.33
2.33'
90.�12'ti ..KBS Electrical';;
- 3.22
3:22
90.`13'j�KBS Electrical ':-:'
2,33
2.33
90-14,'Z -KBS:ElectrIM ,
- 2.30
2.30
90..15 v, -KBS Electrical
320
.3.20
:..90.16; K55 Eledncal^i.
'-2.30.
: 2.30
90. 17:, • KBS Emancal -
ra --. 3.20
'- 3.20.
90.18+KBSE ne al-
-•,.�- 2.3C
-2.30
- 90. 19;=-KBS.Eledn,at
320
- --3.20
90- 20, KBS Electrical;
?.20
2.30
1.80
90-.21 1 -Techline,. Inc..
"
2 4c�-
. 2.49
90- 224 a .KBS Ele,Inc
'2.05'
923Techlme Inc.
;^
<.3
'90-124 KBS Elednw-I
Inc.
-
2.50
:'p; - 2.05
2.50,
- .2:05
90. 25:'-Techline;
_
90- 26 :KBS Eledncal".
-:2.60
:.90.
•,
Techlme, Inc
2:60
_ _
%90-428'V -KBS Electncal ..
: 2 6Ci
;..:2:65
90. 29.; echne Inc
10
2.10
.
90-30'+ KBS Eledncal-:
__-'382 .^
3.82
:.90. 31''z aTechlme; Inc.--;
-. 3.1{
-. 3.15
t90=v32-�-KBSElectrical r..
:.:4.54
'. 4.54.
5:90-,83Techfine'Inc: _
.3:15
3.15
fR;90 d, O(BS_Eledncal
' n,1
.4.54.
a9 " 51i Techllne°Ini „-':3:15 .-3115-
f90=�36.- `KBS Electni 07s
90."OT :tTechhne l'lridr'.,_..
¥s.,.•,..: 10;Z0, �u'�7c`i:: 110:70
',g90=1"38 I%BS,Electncal
g }Techline"�Ilnc..
- Uk7.Oc il" „h-10.70
`II(BS�Ele-ctncat
A.75 c'i{W^` rd 4.75.
..0
:'sTectilina;• n
..
'". M. - :1;'11190 �;';-"11;90
Total
561.45
558.90
98/2003
Z:ClienWGeorgetown/Geo-23.16/Evaluation/Group 90
Summary of Above
Evaluate
Bidder Unit Price (b) Unit Price ($)
KBS;Electrieal
'82.45:
Techlme tnc`:�t'"r-� a'r�- •+mvr. '= & 124;80• 124.80.
Total 561.45 558.90
Madi g_i3nptes`towesxco, piaBjd er ^
'Liquidated Damages Penalty - (10% or 1.10)
2 F.O.B. Penalty - (4% or 1.04)
' Payment Penalty - (1 % or 1.01)
' Not to Specifications
' Exception to minimum quantity requirements
Withdrew bid
r City gives 3% discount to local bidders.
9)8/2003
Z.Clients/Georgetown/Geo 23.16/Evaluation/Group 90
GROUP 1ODMATERIALS
Insulators
SUMMARY OF LOW ITEM BIDDER
Item
Bidder
Submitted
Unit Price ($)
Evaluated
Unit Price ($
upply-
100-8
ty
Supply
5.9 5
Summary ofAbove
rValuated
Bidder Unit Price ($)I Unit Price
29 83
Utiliserve���� 253
'Liquidated Damages Penalty- (1O%or1.1U)
zF.O.B.Penalty ^(4%or1.O4)
'Payment Penalty '(1Y6or1.Ui)
*Nct to Specifications
5Exception tominimum quantity requirements
o
Withdrew bid
/ city gives 3%discount tolocal bidders.
9/812003 Z:Qi*n1n/Gnnoge1nwn/G*o_23j8/Gva|uudnn/Grpup100
GROUP 110 MATERIALS
Capacitor Banks
SUMMARY OF LOW ITEM BIDDER
Item
Bidder
Submitted
Unit Price ($)
Evaluated
Unit Price ($)
11,10-.11' Ad
Y¢87R000
p =2
10
Gd
3',34,9'1) '
3;di48°'04i
y
110=:"3'
""o�Ta
•SjES
1.10 4>
01_
3
01
11D 5s
cal t 567,'...
014
110 6 y'.
KBS cal _
4,575.00
Ot
110 •7irs
KBS`Electncal �: �
'�ki1,218:00
�r218-00'
110-8°.^°
KBffEledncal
3,930:00
t3930�P
110- 9 •-
'KBS;Electncal ;5,018:00
110 10'
KBS,Eledncal
,.+;208'00
'208i00`
116 .11
KBS=Electrical r. ._
'.+'-Ar-•958:00 =X958.00;
110 �2KBS°Electrical
110 '135
KBS iElectncal � ti'
"'325:35
= 325.35
110-,14_:'Priester-Mell
R Nicholson
635:00
b 5 698.50
110.:15';
TEC3Utih Su 1 :- t x .
; 760A0.. 3720<
110-16
TECUtili `SU I
.,�K `�950;00�
<921.;'S0?
Total
69,329.90
69,342.10
Summary of Above
valuated Unit
Bidder Unit Price ($) Price (S)
KBSElectncal� i 0> 6696490
Prieste�jMell
,Zich 3 �(1U8 698 50 i
T.E' 11:11 04 1y656 70:
Total 69,329.90 69 342.10
'Liquidated Damages Penalty - (10% or 1.10)
2 F.O.B. Penalty - (4% or 1.04)
3 Payment Penalty - (1 % or 1.01)
` Not to Specifications
e Exception to minimum quantity requirements
Withdrew bid
City gives 3% discount to local bidders.
9/8/2003
Z:Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Evaluation/Group 110
GROUP 120 MATERIALS
Wood Poles
SUMMARY OF LOW ITEM BIDDER
Summary of Above
1 Liquidated Damages Penalty - (10% or 1.10)
2 F.O.B. Penalty - (4% or 1.04)
'Payment Penalty - (1% or 1.01)
Not to Specifications
5 Exception to minimum quantity requirements
5 Withdrew bid
' City gives 3% discount to local bidders.
9/8/2003
Z:Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Evaluation/Group 120
El
Elmo y
f.` - t '
�
met
yi1z...S
o
•• �s
a" eat-��'t
i '�-�.
.� °
7°
Summary of Above
1 Liquidated Damages Penalty - (10% or 1.10)
2 F.O.B. Penalty - (4% or 1.04)
'Payment Penalty - (1% or 1.01)
Not to Specifications
5 Exception to minimum quantity requirements
5 Withdrew bid
' City gives 3% discount to local bidders.
9/8/2003
Z:Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Evaluation/Group 120
GROUP 130 MATERIALS
Prestressed Spun Cast Concrete Poles
SUMMARY OF GROUP TOTAL
Bidder
Unit
Bid Price ($)
Evaluated
Unit Price ($)
American Light
Cannon Technologies
Claron Enterprise
Claron Enter rise Alt
Dealers Electrical
Fa co
Hometown Connections
Itron
KBS Electrical
3,601.00
KBS Electrical Alt
Preferred Sales 5,249.00
60:OOr'
5,249.00
,`4'475000`"
,
Priester-Melt & Nicholson
TEC Utility Supply
Techline, Inc.
5,982.00
Techline, Inc. Alt
US Meterinq & Tech
Utiliserve Hu hes1
0
5,465.00
Wesco
_fading enotes o, wst:c�omp iarit,-,,,idder ;,£,,
Incomplete Group Bid
' Liquidated Damages Penalty - (10% or 1.10)
z F.O.B. Penalty - (4% or 1.04)
' Payment Penalty - (1 % or 1.01)
° Not to Specifications
e Exception to minimum quantity requirements
e Withdrew bid
7 City gives 3% discount to local bidders.
Z:Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Evaluation/Group 130
GROUP 140 MATERIALS
Steel Distribution Poles
SUMMARY OF LOW ITEM BIDDER
Summary of Above
Evaluated
Bidder Unit Price ($)
Submitted
Evaluated
Item
Bidder
Unit Price ($)
Unit Price ($)
4,946.00
Jtills6t�
97,100
U61iserve Hu"t
es&`i
'425'A0
_ _ 25 00:
140 3 '•
Utiliserve Hu
hes
X547500 "1 54700°<
140 4 rs'
Utiliseive Hu
hes
48400
{TM484.00'
140 5' -
:Utilisenie'Hu
hes
i
6410011
i-406
140 6 '=
Utiliserve Hu
hes
589.00
"-'' 589:00`;
140- 7
Techline Inc
890 00
;,,�890.00-
140- 8 -`
Techline, Inc
850.001
Total
4,946.00
4,946.00
Summary of Above
..�-+. S'A ----��^'— T Vic,: ,r��,$
�ShadingzdenOteslio est,cblrphant Bidder�,_�:_
1 Liquidated Damages Penalty - (10% or 1.10)
2 F.O.B. Penalty - (4% or 1.04)
' Payment Penalty - (1 % or 1.01)
4 Not to Specifications
s Exception to minimum quantity requirements
e Withdrew bid
City gives 3% discount to local bidders.
9/8/2003
Z:Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Evaluation/Group 140
Evaluated
Bidder Unit Price ($)
Unit Price ($)
Tchline'Inc',•31,274060 000»
Utiliserve "' 0
%i,3 206.00 `
Total 4,946.00
4,946.00
..�-+. S'A ----��^'— T Vic,: ,r��,$
�ShadingzdenOteslio est,cblrphant Bidder�,_�:_
1 Liquidated Damages Penalty - (10% or 1.10)
2 F.O.B. Penalty - (4% or 1.04)
' Payment Penalty - (1 % or 1.01)
4 Not to Specifications
s Exception to minimum quantity requirements
e Withdrew bid
City gives 3% discount to local bidders.
9/8/2003
Z:Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Evaluation/Group 140
GROUP 150 MATERIALS
Metering and Miscellaneous Items
SUMMARY OF LOW ITEM BIDDER
9/8/2003
Z:Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Evaluation/Group 150
Submitted
Evaluated
Item
Bidder
Unit Price ($)
Unit Price ($)
150-j,;:;
.KBS,Electpca1
O
X50 2=" rI<BS'EIe�Hic�t
750 3 m
KBSEIe"dtrlca
.'gni
BOA
150 4=+-: Techlln'e Inch•
0'
150.5.-.,_
Techline, Inco-
1507 6 r'
Techline, Inc .`.F,`:>•*�c "z 3 43 00°` . 3w9Us
150 7
Techline Inc,
59.00
150- 8- .
Techline Inc
43 00
150-,9 '>:
•Techline, Inc
5900
59.00
150-10'
'Techline,,inc
5900
y59.00
150-:11
Techline, Inc '—
5900
59.00
150= 12 `
Techline, Inc- - %Or
60.00
60.00
950,313+. ,Cannon,lechnoio ies*-;,
314.00
314.00
150- 14
No Bid
-
150- 15
No Bid
i .gEGr
l 2r, �i).. rrte; , 'No
-18
Bid
r150
No Bid
No Bid
TEC�}l�tilt Su' I WwCrZ�-, fia1
t'ffrt3- ech`not ' lest:. _382 D0
8200;
50'3
no K0" ies 382;-00. 82100:=
X15, 4:
:Gann tje}nofo' les'
82Q0;, 82:00
5025:_
{3anrion7Chn6lo ies' 38200}: 38200:
yp5016
Car4ao"n"»�eohndi"" tes".- ';-
4rD0 • _44700_
11.50 7,
L"✓esco .. _
? 85V=,
_R" ' 85.001'
Fh5028
Wesco
Wesco"
8500
3850D
5029-Wescoy. uYE'8.5t00,'.
85;00^
50 9xi
Wesco !?
Mi85$00
85;
b0. . > Wesco wu';w"'
.. 8.500 5;00'
X50 •
Wesco: ' 85?00,
85:'00:
150- 33
50ainefnc
No Bid
1rT,
-
07:00.
070'.
9/8/2003
Z:Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Evaluation/Group 150
Item
Submitted
Bidder Unit Price (S)
Evaluated
Unit Price ($)
5035:,Te"otliiYShc,:'
4150*6'
teTe'E(t1i,2 1n2�' 40'00 Oi0' ,:
x;50' K37ICBSlectricat�br"`'
69 98 11 69;98;
0 38..
edhl e�I6'S _ : .' 860 ` 8.60'
$ElectOcal�
150- 40
..
No Bid
li Oe. 1._'70:
8870,.
X50
X150
til NT es 7x00
7,00'.
150- 43
No Bid
Q
Total
6,489.78
6,484.18
Summary of Above
Bidder I Unit Price (3) 1 Unit Price
Liquidated Damages Penalty - (10% or 1.10)
2 F.O. B. Penalty - (4% or 1.04)
Payment Penalty - (1% or 1.01)
° Not to Specifications
5 Exception to minimum quantity requirements
6 Withdrew bid
City gives 3% discount to local bidders.
9/8/2003
Z:Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Evaluation/Group 150
GROUP 160 MATERIALS
Automatic Meter Reading (Cannon) Equipment
SUMMARY OF LOW ITEM BIDDER
Summary of Above
-9ub,ftt,d Evaluated
Item Bidder
UnitPrlce($) UnItPrlce($
noicigiesm,
til
,008
[Toanirr 36,108.28
36,108.28
29.1D01
1150.:4 1a
Wtftl 04.
Cannon Tech
I", + h1"248:00XIIW
GannonTech
h2oNin*
tif 468001
�j
,16 P�in-�—Tech
450,01Y
ism
ItIcks
IM74.47
422!,�M Cannoo,T echnoiog
les AjA
160�o ,,,Cannon -T
%VRMif57T20'
cannon'Tei�hncl
I"" lcln�-0676 olym
rannonT
ee.10,395."-
160, 13 �' Cad . non:Tech
',,f.10,395,8V
160f,144 Cannon Tech nologlarl��47,
,,44 iiil*aqj�442.00
tZ4� 2 DO
—
180.15:" CanncdTechnbI0g1es-,j�,
vW.05936.00,
00 936
160--16 Cannonlectinc,10(i
6080
160,47. -dj,—�Tech nologlaa:,�-
-,t9.Zdu. 86 1
1613-,48 Cannon TeChI110109les
A�f, �--j,9�25-48.001
r�&--32
00
00
2-4
160. 20 No bo
Cannon:?
`e 96280 k
1182.S
CsnncdTach22!N!Ls
iRmOE
00
166: 3.:;. Ca,nlfLSh
e, 3.42.
160_,24;
.64
160,25','Cannan Technp,62t!t;L
117:52+"
'1,17:5,
I64369- (;annon-ijacri
'ea;, 124.80
24.80
180-27:x=: cannonTedincilogiesA
-.11
14.80
y686.40
180c -7291'4-C inrm1echnoloolesq,
7'
67.60
iffe—nnon T2Sechno
00.00
-,300.00
—
360.' 7j�inncn T.:hno
-.�QWA82.00
.82.00
TEO—AV ':Cannon Team
:182.'00;
lbz:wr
T66--23; Cannon T
as ;�'102AO
I OZ40
Total36,108.28
36,108.28
Summary of Above
LtNKII _
lid -�'S _n _ PIZFrAEM-7
1 Liquidated Damages Penalty - (10% or 1.10)
2 F,0.8, Penalty - (4% a 1,04)
)Payment Penalty - (1% or 1.01)
'Not to Spedfications
5 Etoeption to minimum quantity requirements
a Vilithdrev, bid
7 City gives 3% discount to local bidders
9/8/2003
Z ClientsJGaorgetown/Geo-23.161EvalUatiordGMUP 160
valuate
Bidder Untt Price ($)I
Unit Price (S1
noicigiesm,
til
0&28z
[Toanirr 36,108.28
36,108.28
LtNKII _
lid -�'S _n _ PIZFrAEM-7
1 Liquidated Damages Penalty - (10% or 1.10)
2 F,0.8, Penalty - (4% a 1,04)
)Payment Penalty - (1% or 1.01)
'Not to Spedfications
5 Etoeption to minimum quantity requirements
a Vilithdrev, bid
7 City gives 3% discount to local bidders
9/8/2003
Z ClientsJGaorgetown/Geo-23.161EvalUatiordGMUP 160
GROUP 170MATERIALS
Automatic Meter Reading (Itron) Equipment
SUMMARY 0FLOW ITEM BIDDER
S/8/2UU3
Z-C|icnts/Georgetnwn8]eo'23,16/EvaluaAiom/Gooup170
Submitted
Evaluated
Item
Bidder
Unit Price
Unit Price
tit
40030
111
3,550.0
870.00�
1,040,00
1,040.00,
170- 7
Itron
56.50
170- 11
Itron
10,50100
io,500.00
170- 12
Hometown Correcfions
.5
86.25
70-1 P,
US Metering & Ten
16 00
170- 22
No Bid
34.93
34-93
15Z Arprall
170-33 No Bid
j70!�'f34AA0$W,df& MR
S/8/2UU3
Z-C|icnts/Georgetnwn8]eo'23,16/EvaluaAiom/Gooup170
Summary of Above
Evaluated Unit
Bidder Unit Price ($) Price ($)
Hometowia°'o0neetiof�'s § 93,"Aa 92>00:
ft�'o 9298.' , 9 98 e
Total 52,575.88 52,575.88
' Liquidated Damages Penalty - (10% or 1.10)
2 F.O.B. Penalty - (4% or 1.04)
'Payment Penalty - (1 % or 1.01)
° Not to Specifications
s Exception to minimum quantity requirements
e Withdrew bid
' City gives 3% discount to local bidders.
Z:Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Evaluation/Group 170 9/8/2003
RNIMOM
:
c� c
.11
to
`
i'
LO -
�
0} I L
...,.n,......• 1 1 1 1 /
a 1.
1 - 1 I$ff=�•rIR rrz- 1 a' *r t*
' �,; , r. 1 11
ti".,..: , • 1 '11
�'?C'.+BI•
L."I:
:
SL • al° •
®
• : •
��
Summary of Above
Evaluated Unit
Bidder Unit Price ($) Price ($)
Hometowia°'o0neetiof�'s § 93,"Aa 92>00:
ft�'o 9298.' , 9 98 e
Total 52,575.88 52,575.88
' Liquidated Damages Penalty - (10% or 1.10)
2 F.O.B. Penalty - (4% or 1.04)
'Payment Penalty - (1 % or 1.01)
° Not to Specifications
s Exception to minimum quantity requirements
e Withdrew bid
' City gives 3% discount to local bidders.
Z:Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Evaluation/Group 170 9/8/2003
GROUP 180 MATERIALS
Street Lighting Materials
SUMMARY OF LOW ITEM BIDDER
9/8/2003
Z:Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Evaluation/Group 180
Submitted Evaluated
Item
Bidder
Unit Price (S) Unit Price (S)
18071 2: ,r ssTechline Inc
180 -2,= "KBS Electncal '"-'
1n2 O152:b0
13
80
'
i� 9.00
180.4 a;
Wescott
L 4'25;
!— -
180 5'.c
Dealers Electri(%l,
__
_4 fig � 4.66
180- 6 :`:
American Li MTV__�
—�. 419
1�
180- 7
American Li htp ^
a — - _ 1.88
-180-,8 : '
'Techline Inc ,-
u15,00 - .615.00
180 9,.+
':TEG.Utili Su
30 00 795:40
180- 10
No Bid
180- 11
180-12:
No Bid
KB5:Electncal
34 75'x`34:75
^`'
`KBSElectrical
= 44.80
,180-,,-13
180' 14 .'
KBS Electrical
—1
180::15::
KBS
` " 15.60
-
180-",16 !;
KBS Electrical "
2890 28.90"
180-,.17,,
aTechline Inc
260,00 260.00
180'08:;:
.UtiliserV6 Hu hes)
7 H =7::88
005-4,9',+
KBS Electrical.:, -
8.85
X80 0'":
American ht
8 33 <+'a 87331
X18 1` iDe'alers Electrical
4 38 = 4`25
;,KBS,Electncalt _
�•zad.'1440 ro{. 14:40
.80,72
3
TEG::Utih SU I ";sU� :; 'µJ 1 5.80,h*bg5 ' =25:03;
.
A—Bo
-ct line Inc c 4.e�»f Y' 6 00: 96:00
5`61i(ie
tic: _ ,..
09;OOp, 109.00=
_
Bile nc,
. r&w3109 09 .. j 09:00
80
yi c ��a x,50 00� 150.00
48028
t9t8S75Electtical.
5•: 3s 5 3335;
318 9
echllne, lid
05, AVWW05.00.
,
181)$30
line+q
505i00 si�50S:00>
$0 1
teEzSii iso % 9 50 7 59:50
.
180- 32
$0 3
No Bid
},KBS:`:EleciCical "� t3c v- 'S760r ;37-60-
B0
Tech irioy,tJnc.* -Mnw
.-e x69 OOi, • %fi9.00r
9/8/2003
Z:Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Evaluation/Group 180
Summary of Above
��'e`mitt:�:2'�'%a-�.}�•1'�•7•J1�-L��tF�� • �f- .
' Liquidated Damages Penalty - (10% or 1.10)
2 F.O.B. Penalty - (4% or 1.04)
3 Payment Penalty - (1% or 1.01)
Not to Specifications
5 Exception to minimum quantity requirements
6 Withdrew bid
City gives 3% discount to local bidders.
Z:Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Evaluation/Group 180 9/8/2003
valuated
Bidder
Unit Price (S)
Unit Price ($)
Amedcah:Electricps
Dealers ElectndSu I
g 18
` ;. x90
KBS:Electrical ?r^r --
_
�- 3 540A
`__, 50
825.AM,
v �' 59:50:
Priester:Su
645 �Bl
20"40..
TE(XA2tili U .I ry
€4h1.lt�eis
1.384 05
l�bpserue �i�t"taes -
_16 83
6;88>
' ;425`
6,594.83
Total
6,620.48
��'e`mitt:�:2'�'%a-�.}�•1'�•7•J1�-L��tF�� • �f- .
' Liquidated Damages Penalty - (10% or 1.10)
2 F.O.B. Penalty - (4% or 1.04)
3 Payment Penalty - (1% or 1.01)
Not to Specifications
5 Exception to minimum quantity requirements
6 Withdrew bid
City gives 3% discount to local bidders.
Z:Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Evaluation/Group 180 9/8/2003
GROUP 190 MATERIALS
Station Class Voltage Regulators
SUMMARY OF GROUP TOTAL
Bidder
Unit
Bid Price (S)
Evaluated
Unit Price (S)
American Li ht
Cannon Technologies
Claron Enterprise
Claron Enterprise Alt
Dealers Electrical
Fa co
8,393.00
19,642.50
Hometown Connections
-
-
Itron
KBS Electrical
Preferred Sales
Priester Supply Co.
8,438.00
-
8,438.00
19,893.25
'' 23,683.22
Priester-Melt & Nicholson
-
TEC Utility Supply
Techline, Inc.
Techline, Inc. Alt
US Metenn & Tech
Utiliserve Hu hes
Wesco
"
incomplete Group Bid
' Liquidated Damages Penalty - (10% or 1.10)
I F.O.B. Penalty - (4% or 1.04)
3 Payment Penalty - 0% or 1.01)
4 Not to Specifications .
B Exception to minimum quantity requirements
Withdrew bid
r City gives 3% discount to local bidders.
9/8/2003
Z:/Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Group 190
GROUP 200 MATERIALS
Single -Phase Single Voltage Pad -Mounted
Electric Distribution Transformers
24940 GRDY/14400 to 240/120
SUMMARY OF GROUP TOTAL
Bidder
Unit
Bid Price ($)
Evaluated
Unit Price ($)
American Li ht
Cannon Technologies
Claron Enterprise
Claron Enterprise Alt
Dealers Electrical
Fa co
Hometown Connections
Itron
KBS Electrical
13,928.00
30,769.20
KBS Electrical Alt
9,415.00
19,397.90
Preferred Sales
-
Priester Supply Co.
Priester-Mell & Nicholson
14,874.75
12,056.00
30,264.35
' 31,610.34
TETEC Util. Su I
fill
Techline, Inc. Alt
12,579.00
6,7.MEMO::
10,626.00
5,989.31
26,471.60
US Metering & Tech
UtiliserveHu hes
"
Wesco
13,165.00
27,899.80
' Liquidated Damages Penalty - (10% or 1.10)
Z F.O.B. Penalty - (4% or 1.04)
3 Payment Penalty - (1% or 1.01)
4 Not to Specifications
S Exception to minimum quantity requirements
Withdrew bid
City gives 3% discount to local bidders.
9/8/2003
Z:/Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Evaluation/Group 200
GROUP 210 MATERIALS
Single -Phase Dual Voltage Pad -Mounted
Electric Distribution Transformers
12470 GRDY/7200 x 24940 GRDY/14400 to 240/120
SUMMARY OF GROUP TOTAL
Bidder
Unit
Bid Price (5)
Evaluated
Unit Price (S)
American Light
Cannon Technologies
Claron Enterprise
Claron Enterprise Alt
Dealers Electrical
Fa co
Hometown Connections
Itron
KBS Electrical
14,773.00
31,193.65
KBS Electrical Alt
9,052.00
19,778.75
Preferred Sales
-
Priester Supply Co.
Priester-Melt & Nicholson
14,828.50
13,373.00
31,073.25
32,402.52
i
ESu I
252
1818
—
Techline, Inc. Alt
11,303.00
27,176.60
US Metering 8 Tech
-
Ut iliserve eHu hes
8,269.00
23,102.95
Wesco
14,135.00
28,916.25
F..
a
. , �,�__ �r�J�la�lf •k�S� �`wS
1 Liquidated Damages Penalty - (10% or 1.10)
2 F.O.B. Penalty - (4% or 1.04)
J Payment Penalty - (1% or 1.01)
Not to Specifications
5 Exception to minimum quantity requirements
Withdrew bid
City gives 3% discount to local bidders.
9/8/2003
Z:/Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Evaluation/Group 210
GROUP 220 MATERIALS
Three -Phase Single Voltage Pad -Mounted
Electric Distribution Transformers
24940 GRDY/14400 to 480Y/277
SUMMARY OF LOW ITEM BIDDER
Item
Bidder
Submitted
Unit Price ($)
Evaluated
Unit Price ($)
SF220 x1 r 'TEC-Utili
tSu I"e:
<'` . 3 345:00
_ 432;5E'
;220 2
TEG Utilib Su
3,445100 V� I�`�`%`IM577.'96'
x220.,3,
TECUtili
Su !y
�_
3,905:007,670:66
V20-:4 ::i`
TEC Utility
SUC[Ily
4,530.00
r .+s=91432"43
X220-',5• !
:TEC Utility
Su piv
?220- 6X• :
TEC Utili
;Su !v
7;574.00
i '" '-16,407:84'i
;220- 7;-;1
EU, Utility
1025000
3;997-.27
$220- 8 ;4
Inc„r,;
Techline}^w
- 11,333;00
9x649:85
:220-, 9 ''
TEC>lltif
1Su I "; :'
_6-77,4.32
4220- 10`:
Techlin
Alt`,
19,436:00: 3;670:80
220- 11
No Bid
-
Total
84,903.00
223,184.30
Summary of Above
' Liquidated Damages Penalty - (10% or 1.10)
2 F.O.B. Penalty - (4% or 1.04)
' Payment Penalty - (I% or 1.01)
4 Not to Specifications
5 Exception to minimum quantity requirements
6 Withdrew bid
7 City gives 3% discount to local bidders.
9/8/2003
Z:/Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Group 220
GROUP 230 MATERIALS
Three -Phase Single Voltage Pad -Mounted
Electric Distribution Transformers
12470 GRDYf7200 x 24940 GRDY/14400 to 208Y/120
SUMMARY OF GROUP TOTAL
'i-• 3 - 7KOM lame Em
Incomplete Group B.
Liquidated Damages Penalty - (10% or 1.10)
2 F.O.B. Penalty - (4% or 1.04)
3 Payment Penalty - (1 % or 1.01)
" Not to Specifications
e Exception to minimum quantity requirements
e Withdrew bid
City gives 3% discount to local bidders.
2:/Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Group 230
9/8/2003
7.
GROUP 240 MATERIALS
Three -Phase Dual Voltage Pad -Mounted
Electric Distribution Transformers
12470 GRDY/7200 x 24940 GRDY/14400 to 208YI120
SUMMARY OF LOW ITEM BIDDER
Item
Bidder
Submitted
Unit Price (S)
Evaluated
Unit Price ($)
40381"�,
TECUtili"°Sut
856000' ,. 3°
2402 •',
TEC Utili
3,695:00
'4t 6 70 63
24
TEC Ufllity Supply,4,055:00
z _ 4;:7;828.68
240 `4
TEC Utili Su I _
4,815:00
3; `'4,1`9 713.3Y
240-'5 -'
_
TEC Utili .,5S I
5,350.00
"11,919.12
440- 6,
Techline,=1n
< 8,004.00
17,800.85
40 7_'.
`TEC Utili `Sii r'•
-'.10,335.00 25,021.15
&,
48
;TEC'Utili "',
'`12,100.00
t r ° 31,655°7-1
' 1
EC,Utili .
15,440.00
-r 48,534.44
,
40 10; eChlin3 Lh 4 :i`• -
-°22;961:00
_,64,908.25.
Total
90,315.00
229,717.84
Summary of Above
Mmgden�o Slo>estfeo SBidderZ:
Liquidated Damages Penalty - (10% or 1.10)
2 F.O. B. Penalty - (4% or 1.04)
Payment Penalty - (1 % or 1.01)
" Not to Specifications
5 Exception to minimum quantity requirements
6 Withdrew bid
City gives 3% discount to local bidders.
9/8/2003
Z:/Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Group 240
"`":>c�1..
�' "6�""-'
L�-.
a .a 1 • / .
Mmgden�o Slo>estfeo SBidderZ:
Liquidated Damages Penalty - (10% or 1.10)
2 F.O. B. Penalty - (4% or 1.04)
Payment Penalty - (1 % or 1.01)
" Not to Specifications
5 Exception to minimum quantity requirements
6 Withdrew bid
City gives 3% discount to local bidders.
9/8/2003
Z:/Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Group 240
GROUP 250 MATERIALS
Three -Phase Dual Voltage Pad -Mounted
Electric Distribution Transformers
12470 GRDY17200 x 24940 GRDY/14400 to 2401120
SUMMARY OF GROUP TOTAL
Bidder
Unit
Bid Price (S)
Evaluated
Unit Price (b)
American Li ht
Cannon Technologies
Claron Enterprise
Claron Enterprise Alt
Dealers Electrical
Fa co
Hometown Connections
Itron
KBS Electrical
20,933.00
35,767.70
KBS Electrical AR
15,853.00
30,652.40
Preferred Sales
-
Priester Supply Co.
21,509.00
35,695.95
Priester-Mell & Nicholson
T,EQR7
Techline, Inc.
19,804.00
.
5,640.00
38,089.04
Techline, Inc. Alt
17,225.00
33,130.15
US Meten & Tech
Utiiiserve Hu hes
Wesco
1 20,655.0034,944.90
Liquidated Damages Penalty - (10%, or 1.10)
2 F.O.B. Penalty - (4% or 1.04)
3 Payment Penalty - (1 % or 1.01)
` Not to Specifications
5 Exception to minimum quantity requirements
6 Withdrew bid
7 City gives 3% discount to local bidders.
9/8/2003
Z:/Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Group 250
GROUP 260 MATERIALS
Three -Phase Dual Voltage Pad -Mounted
Electric Distribution Transformers
12470 GRDY/7200 x 24940 GRDY/14400 to 480Y/120
SUMMARY OF LOW ITEM BIDDER
Item
Unit Price $
Bidder
Submitted Evaluated
Unit Price ($) Unit Price ($)
==TEC,Utili
Su I ^;;
-fid 565.001z3,11133-
4260- 2 ',
TEC'Utili
Su I .'," r..
WW_ ;680:00 w F > , 6,540:18
A960-3
TEC`Utili
"Su 1 =':.
4,023:00 ti `�S t'`t7;583;5t
;260- 4
J_ECUfility
Supply
4,725.00 tls ' w, 9,435:77
;260-5
TEC Utility,
" Supply".
5,125.00 e :-` +.'.11;205.93
X260- 6
TEC Utili
Su I
6,353.00 + t-;15;407:33
'.-'.•260 7
TEC Utili
' supply,`t
9,720:00 w"22;779::19
1260;'8" -
TEG Utility
Su I ":
"9,835:00 ,*' 28,424'.69.
605c9 '
JEC`Utili
"_Su I'-"
:.15;015:00` , 7 ' .37,866 86
160"41
W.ej;Li
:' 21,565:00; : 63;469.15
Total
101,296.00 257,225.63
Summary of Above
Bidder
Unit Price $
Evaluated Unit
Price $
7.E +l1Yll1 i' � �« .&u 4 '"
;�r"M' X731 00y
1937,5fi`48:3
Total
101,296.00
257,225.63
ing , no es o es : m..fian i der _'
' Liquidated Damages Penalty - (10% or 1.10)
Z F.O.B. Penalty - (4% or 1.04)
'Payment Penalty - (11% or 1.01)
Not to Specifications
e Exception to minimum quantity requirements
e Withdrew bid
' City gives 3% discount to local bidders.
Z:/Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Group 260
9/8/2003
GROUP 270 MATERIALS
Single -Phase Single Voltage Pole -Mounted
Electric Distribution Transformers
14400/24940Y'to128/240
SUMMARY OF LOW ITEM BIDDER
Item
Bidder
Submitted
Unit Price ($1
Evaluated
Unit Price ($)
ca
1 945 Z5,
�k270-,
TEC Utility Sueely
154 61
Total
7,520.00
19,183.53
Summary oVAbove
ffU
1Liquidated Damages Penalty '(lOY6or1.1O)
2F.O.B.Penalty ~(4%or1.O4)
^ Payment Penalty '(1%or1.O1)
^ Not toSpecifications
5Exception tominimum quantity requirements
o
Withdrew bid
/ City gives 3%discount tolocal bidders.
Z:/Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Group 270
9/8/2003
GROUP 280 MATERIALS
Single -Phase Single Voltage Pole -Mounted
Electric Distribution Transformers
14400/24940Y to 277
SUMMARY OF LOW ITEM BIDDER
Item
Bidder
Submitted Evaluated
Unit Price ($) Unit Price (S)
KBS.Electrical
1145900 1 '809'M..
1280-2
TEC Jtili ,Su I
498:00 1,001:23,
80-,3
-TEC Utili "=Su" i
620:00 1;325:65
Techline'Incv Alt
734.00 x: n;1M;783.95
7,631.00
Techline,itto Alt n'k
795.00
F80-
KBS EI ' I Alt rfi
1077.00
Techlin'e�lt
1,272.00" 3;592:75;
8
Tecfih�e�°n�
2 176.00 ,# .' ' ?:5269;40
X280 -._
7,831.00 18,940.94
Total
Summary of Above
Bidder
Unit Price (S)
Evaluated Unit
Price (S)
KBS.Electrical
b:
TEC Utili Su I {'? „ n; 1,5,7.700
Techli e Jnc ",5, 8�r,"rt,
y •.OQ
5
whline,
18,940.94
Total
7,631.00
aFn- .°' esso e t co, Mp Ian : i er:<• ..
Liquidated Damages Penalty - (10% or 1.10)
Z F.O.B. Penalty - (4% or 1.04)
'Payment Penalty - (1% or 1.01)
' Not to Specifications
5 Exception to minimum quantity requirements
6 Withdrew bid
' City gives 3% discount to local bidders.
9/8/2003
Z:/Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Group 280
GROUP 290 MATERIALS
Single -Phase Single Voltage Pole -Mounted
Electric Distribution Transformers
14400/24940Y to 480/240
SUMMARY OF LOW ITEM BIDDER
Summary of Above
p� } a. m mai M4
Liquidated Damages Penalty - (10% or 1.10)
2 F.O.B. Penalty - (4% or 1.04)
a Payment Penalty - (1% or 1.01)
° Not to Specifications
5 Exception to minimum quantity requirements
6 Withdrew bid
City gives 3% discount to local bidders.
9/8/2003
2:/Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Group 290
Submitted
Evaluated
Item
Bidder
Unit Price (S)
Unit Price (S)
-290��:
s tili Su I `=
r'x645'00� g .1 t335?.
290- 2" EQTJ6fi Su2ply
773.00 k d1;735i8
290- _3,:-
Te=e inc- {Alt) -
839:00
<.2,224:45'
290- 4
KBS Electrical (Alt)
_1,094.00
931:9M,
290- 5 -
KBS.Eiectna3l (Alt)
1;333.00
r„3;556:95.
-290= 6 ;i
;.TEC Utili Su `.
1,275:00
>;4,939.92.
Total
6,459.00
16,724.05
Summary of Above
p� } a. m mai M4
Liquidated Damages Penalty - (10% or 1.10)
2 F.O.B. Penalty - (4% or 1.04)
a Payment Penalty - (1% or 1.01)
° Not to Specifications
5 Exception to minimum quantity requirements
6 Withdrew bid
City gives 3% discount to local bidders.
9/8/2003
2:/Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Group 290
GROUP 300 MATERIALS
Single -Phase Dual Voltage Pole -Mounted
Electric Distribution Transformers
7200/12470Y x 14400/24940Y to 120/240
SUMMARY OF LOW ITEM BIDDER
Item
Bidder
Evaluated Unit
Submitted
Unit Price ($)
Evaluated
Unit Price ($)
"300 1
;• `PriesterSu' "'Coc
KBS,Ele&dcalr
+ � x40900 646!601
300 2 -
> KBS Electrical :;
rK463.00
t876S95.
300- 3
TEC Utilq
Su IY
§,
;,704.00
sCr`r=1,433:90.
300= 4
TEC Utili
Su
r=800.00
x'1;414;31,
300-•5
TEC Utility
Su l
910.00
i4, ` t r 2,204:52'
300-6
TEC:Utili';Su
l
1;120.00
;-, ,3;017:23
300- 7
TEC'a7til'
8Su I
1;325.00
3,588.47_
`300- 8
TECllt1'
'`Sil I .'-
;527:74
2;050 00 # X15'
7,781.00
18,709.72
Total
Summary of Above
iShiding' nogW022' .,s 3 milia idde_
Liquidated Damages Penalty - (10% or 1.10)
2 F.O.B. Penalty - (4% or 1.04)
' Payment Penalty - (1 % or 1.01)
Not to Specifications
' Exception to minimum quantity requirements
Withdrew bid
' City gives 3% discount to local bidders.
9/8/2003
Z:/Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Group 300
Evaluated Unit
Bidder
Unit Price $
Price $
KBS,Ele&dcalr
Priester.Su I Co ?
h 409D
R
TECUtilit Supply- •
6,909:00`+;
§,
—
Total
7,7"01.00
18,709.72
iShiding' nogW022' .,s 3 milia idde_
Liquidated Damages Penalty - (10% or 1.10)
2 F.O.B. Penalty - (4% or 1.04)
' Payment Penalty - (1 % or 1.01)
Not to Specifications
' Exception to minimum quantity requirements
Withdrew bid
' City gives 3% discount to local bidders.
9/8/2003
Z:/Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Group 300
GROUP 318MATERIALS
Single -Phase Dual Voltage Pole -Mounted
Electric Distribution Transformers
7200/12470Y x 14400/24940Y to 277
SUMMARY QFLOW ITEM BIDDER
Summary of Above
1Liquidated Damages Penalty ^(l0%ov1.1D)
2F.O.B.Penalty ^(4%or1.O4)
'Payment Penalty ^(I%or1.Ol)
*Nct to Specifications
' Exception b7minimum quantity requirements
^ Withdrew bid
/ City gives 3%discount 10local bidders.
9/8/2003
Submitted Evaluated
Item
Bidder
Unit Price ($) Unit Pric e ($)
,
I 049'6
7,628.00 18,872.51
Total
Summary of Above
1Liquidated Damages Penalty ^(l0%ov1.1D)
2F.O.B.Penalty ^(4%or1.O4)
'Payment Penalty ^(I%or1.Ol)
*Nct to Specifications
' Exception b7minimum quantity requirements
^ Withdrew bid
/ City gives 3%discount 10local bidders.
9/8/2003
GROUP 320 MATERIALS
Single -Phase Dual Voltage Pole -Mounted
Electric Distribution Transformers
7200/12470Y x 14400/24940Y to 480240
SUMMARY OF GROUP TOTAL
Bidder
Unit
Bid Price ($)
Evaluated
Unit Price ($)
American Li ht
Cannon Technologies
Ciaron Enterprise
Claron Enterprise AR
Dealers Electrical
Fa co
Hometown Connections
Itron
KBS Electrical
3,506.00
8,795.70
KBS Electrical Alt
6,709.00
17,328.45
Preferred Sales
-
Priester Supply Co.
Priester-Mell & Nicholson
3,512.00
-
8,676.40
Techline, Inc.
8,485.00
19,851.10
Techline, Inc. Alt
7,982.00
20,195.85
US Metering & Tech
-
Utiliserve (Hughes)
-
Wesco
7,636.00
18,542.65
� -� �,•.-'��nMtin15'uJ14':%11:15u�4,j�.J'',lA.� ..�;
Liquidated Damages Penalty - (10% or 1.10)
2 F.O.B. Penalty - (4% or 1.04)
3 Payment Penalty - (1 % or 1.01)
Not to Specifications
s Exception to minimum quantity requirements
Withdrew bid
City gives 3% discount to local bidders.
Z:/Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Group 320
9/8/2003
GROUP 330 MATERIALS
Single -Phase Pole -Mounted
Electric Distribution Step Transformers
SUMMARY OF GROUP TOTAL
Bidder
Unit
Bid Price (S)
Evaluated
Unit Price (S)
American Li ht
Cannon Technologies
Claron Enterprise
Claron Enterprise Alt
Dealers Electrical
Fa co
Hometown Connections
Itron
KBS Electrical
KBS Electrical Alt
Preferred Sales
Priester Supply Co.
Priester-Melt & Nicholson
7,164.00
25,737.35
TEC UtilitySupply
7,300.00
Techline, Inc.
8,015.00
23,854.45
Techline, Inc. Alt
7,894.00
23,965.20
US Metering & Tech
Utiliserve Hu hes
�„
5a
' Liquidated Damages Penalty - (10% or 1.10)
Y F.O.B. Penalty - (4% or 1.04)
J Payment Penalty - (1% or 1.01)
Not to Specifications
S Exception to minimum quantity requirements
6 Withdrew bid
City gives 3% discount to local bidders.
Z:/Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Group 330
9/8/2003
-77
GROUP 340 MATERIALS
Single -Phase Single Voltage Pad -Mounted
Transformer with Vacuum Switch
SUMMARY OF LOW ITEM BIDDER
Item
Bidder
Submitted
Unit Price ($)
Evaluated
Unit Price ($)
2340 .,1;
KBS 1,Pnesterou 1
45;242 00 .> 5;475.4
340_.2 4•1"
KBS '/ Priester Su I
,75;404. 0
7;238:30
340 3 "
Priesterbu I ,Co: -
5,420.00
6 50
340-'4
Priester Su I ';Cd.
6;225.00
,:400;28.286:95
340- 5
No Bid
22,341.00
1 31,656.85
Total
Summary of Above
Evaluated Unit
Bidder Unit Price ($) Price ($)
KBS /:Priester Supe 0i646;U0 G_O4
Pries tefSu I C. G695100R 5's
Total 22,341.00 31,656.85
'Liquidated Damages Penalty- (10% or 1.10)
2 F.O.B. Penalty - (4% or 1.04)
' Payment Penalty - (1% or 1.01)
° Not to Specifications
5 Exception to minimum quantity requirements
6 Withdrew bid
' City gives 3% discount to local bidders.
9/8/2003
Z:/Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Group 340
GROUP 350 MATERIALS
Single -Phase Dual Voltage Pad -Mounted
Transformer with Vacuum Switch
SUMMARY OF LOW ITEM BIDDER
Summary of Above
�^`�%� �fl!69.1TJ+L�%�J=1%L .e1 5�,. �'���T.,'1 BY ����-✓::.�.. ..,' 'y' -"�
Liquidated Damages Penalty - (10% or 1.10)
Y F.O.B. Penalty - (4% or 1.04)
3 Payment Penalty - (1% or 1.01)
° Not to Specifications
6 Exception to minimum quantity requirements
6 Withdrew bid
City gives 3% discount to local bidders.
9/8/2003
Z:/Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Group 350
Submitted
Evaluated
Item
Bidder
Unit Price (S)
Unit Price ($)
X50 I'="
KBS7.Priesterl
I,5i303t00
536a10
50 2 "
:KBSElectncal. :•
5,464.G0
7,298.30
%350-3
KBS Electrical
b,531.00
7,71250
11350,,.4 iy
KBSI Priester Supply
6,288.00
'10,349.95
350-5
22,586.00
31,901.85
Total
Summary of Above
�^`�%� �fl!69.1TJ+L�%�J=1%L .e1 5�,. �'���T.,'1 BY ����-✓::.�.. ..,' 'y' -"�
Liquidated Damages Penalty - (10% or 1.10)
Y F.O.B. Penalty - (4% or 1.04)
3 Payment Penalty - (1% or 1.01)
° Not to Specifications
6 Exception to minimum quantity requirements
6 Withdrew bid
City gives 3% discount to local bidders.
9/8/2003
Z:/Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Group 350
GROUP 368MATERIALS
Three -Phase Single Voltage Pad -Mounted
Electric Distribution Transformers
24040GRDY/14400tn4160Y72400
SUMMARY QFLOW ITEM BIDDER
Summary of Above
'Liquidated Damages Penalty- (10% or 1.10)
zF.O.B.Penalty -(4%ori.04)
nPayment Penalty '(196or1.U1)
* Not 1oSpecifications
�Exception tominimum quantity requirements
o
Withdrew bid
/ City gives 396discount h)local bidders.
9/8/2003
Z:/Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Group 360
Item
Bidder
UnitPrIce($)
__Un!tPrice($)
9,23 MW
line,1
',,25453,10
Summary of Above
'Liquidated Damages Penalty- (10% or 1.10)
zF.O.B.Penalty -(4%ori.04)
nPayment Penalty '(196or1.U1)
* Not 1oSpecifications
�Exception tominimum quantity requirements
o
Withdrew bid
/ City gives 396discount h)local bidders.
9/8/2003
Z:/Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Group 360
GROUP 370 MATERIALS
Substation Equipment
SUMMARY OF GROUP TOTAL
• (- �....
Liquidated Damages Penalty - (10% or 1.10)
s F.O.B. Penalty - (4% or 1.04)
'Payment Penalty - (1 % or 1.01)
° Not to Specifications
6 Exception to minimum quantity requirements
6 Withdrew bid
City gives 3% discount to local bidders.
9/8/2003
Z:Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Evaluation/Group 370
Unit
Evaluated
Bidder
Bid Price (S)
Unit Price (S)
American Light--
i htCannon
CannonTechnologies
Claron Enterprise
Claron Enterprise Alt
Dealers Electrical
-3M
F..i
9 85
S=
Hometown Connections
Itron
KBS Electrical
36,596.00
KBS Electrical Alt
-
Preferred Sales
Priester Supply Co.
36,596.00
Priester-Mell & Nicholson
-
TEC Utility Supply
Techline, Inc.
Techline, Inc. Alt
US Metering & Tech
Utiliserve Hu hes
Wesco
• (- �....
Liquidated Damages Penalty - (10% or 1.10)
s F.O.B. Penalty - (4% or 1.04)
'Payment Penalty - (1 % or 1.01)
° Not to Specifications
6 Exception to minimum quantity requirements
6 Withdrew bid
City gives 3% discount to local bidders.
9/8/2003
Z:Clients/Georgetown/Geo-23.16/Evaluation/Group 370
Council Meeting Date: September 22, 2003
Executive Session
AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET
Item No.
SUBJECT:
Consideration and possible action to renew the contract,
between the City of Georgetown and Flowers Construction Company,
L.P., for electric system maintenance and construction services.
ITEM SUMMARY:
In April, 2000 the Georgetown City Council approved the
contract for electric system maintenance and construction to be
performed by Flowers Construction Company L.P. This contract is a
five year contract renewable annually upon the agreement of both
the City and Flowers Construction. This year, both the City of
Georgetown and Flowers Construction Company L.P. have agreed to
renew the contract from October 1, 2003 through September 30, 2004.
Therefore, staff recommends Council approval of the contract
renewal in the amount of $900,000.00.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS:
NONE
GUS BOARD RECOMMENDATION:
GUS Board recommends approval to Council at its September 16,
2003 meeting. Approved 6-0 (Brown absent)
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the Flowers Construction contract
for 2003-2004 for Electric Distribution Services
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Funds not to exceed the amount of $900,000.00 are to be paid
from the Electric Capital Improvement Projects funds as work is
completed.
COMMENTS:
Flowers Construction Company has been the electric system
contractor since the initial Construction and Maintenance bid in
1994. They have always been very willing to work with both the
City's consultant, McCord Engineering, and City staff, when asked
to increase or decrease staffing due to construction requirements.
ATTACHMENTS:
Letter
ted By:
ing for contract evvalua
1.
Ass�aCity Manager
it
Energy
W.
a
Mr. Mike Mayben
Energy Services Manager
City of Georgetown
P.O. Box 409
Georgetown, Texas 78628
McCORD ENGINEERING, INC.
916 Southwest Parkway East, P.O. Box 10047
College Station, Texas 77642 (979) 764.6356
Fax (979) 764.9644
August 19, 2003
RE: City of Georgetown Labor Contract No. Geo -00 -ED -1
Flowers Construction Company Requested
Price Increase Evaluation
In accordance with your request, we have completed the evaluation for the requested price
increase for Flowers Construction Company. We evaluated the proposed unit prices with unit totals
constructed from June, 2001 thru May, 2002 and compared the total cost of construction of the
existing unit prices to the proposed unit prices. Enclosed herewith is the evaluation of the proposed
unit prices. The proposed unit prices increased the total contract cost of $820,243.56 to $875,809.07
for a difference of $55,565.51. The proposed unit priced increased the contract amount by 6.77%.
This is the first request for an increase in unit prices by Flowers Construction Company since
this contract has been in effect since June 27, 2000. Flowers Construction Company has been
working for the City since 1995, has done satisfactory work, and has worked hard to complete
projects in a timely manner. It is our recommendation that the City extend this contract for a twelve
(12) month period as allowed in the contract. This contract allows up to a maximum of five (5) one-
year extensions at the City's option and consent of the Contractor. This extension would be the third
extension for the contract.
Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions, or need further information.
Dw/,)k
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Jim Briggs (w/encl.)
Mr. John Thomas (w/enol.)
Sincerely
McCord ENGINEERING, INC.
David Witte
Underground Design Div. Mgr.
qk
McCord Engineering, Inc.
P.O. Box 10047
College Station, Texas 77840
CITY OF GEORGETOWN
LABOR BID EVALUATION
for
Contract No. GEO-00-ED-1
SUMMARY
of FLOWERS CONSTRUCTION
Contract No. GEO-00-ED-1
Pronosed Unit Price Change Total
Cold Units
Hot Units
TOTAL
Cold Units
Hot Units
TOTAL
$740,667.44
$135,141.63
$875,809.07
Contract No. GEO-00-ED-1
Existing Unit Price Total
Total Increase in Existing Contract
% of Increase In Contract
$703,323.16
$116,920.40
$820,243.56
$55,565.51
6.77%
19 -Aug -03
Z Contract No. GEO-00-ED-1 8/19/2003
Unit Constructed
June 1, 2001 - May 31, 2002
with PROPOSED UNIT PRICES
z:\dients\georgetown\Ge 21.4\2001-2002 Totals(Neg).xls
Pdt1'
0.51345
0.50295
14646
468
388
6,305.10
24029
194.14
D #1/0 ACSR0.43050"
DM1/OTPLX _.._- ._
0 #2 TPLX
58AAC
D#350 MCM OPLX
D if4 ACSR
D#4 TPLX -. _ -
-----
0.56625
16719
9,467.13
0.58800 190
111.72
0.40950 6612
_ 2,707.61
0.50295 775
389.79
D #410 TPLX --- ----
-
0.58432
_ 400
233.73
D #6 DPLX -----_-�
D #795 AAC
_
0.49502
0.57675
_ _ 750
2315
371.27
1,335.18
D Gswvice _
UD #110 AI 16.25 kV --
U_D #V6AJ QPLX _ ....--
UD #ib AI TPLX
UD #12-2 Cu
- -_
52,00
31
1,612.00
1.07 38507
41,202.49
125 _ 150
187.50
1.12 7336.4
8,216.77
0.42 2825
1.186.50
UD #4/0 AI 15.25 kV Primary
U #410-A-3 TPLX -- -----
---
126
20217
25,473.42
1.12 14188
15.890.56
_0
UD #350 MCM N - --__
1.17
1265.6
1,480.75
UD #500 MCM 15.25 Kv
2.15
6180
13,287.00
G30- ._... .--'-------
G35 ---
640
G45-- -"---.... ----
G50 _ _ _ _ ------
GE1.1_-- --'----..._
GE7-2 ------ ._---
GE1-2_X
GF201 -- - - ----" - -
-
----
---
75.90
4
303.60
75.90 7
531.30
100.90 19
1,917.10
120.00 41
_ 4,920.00
130.00 13
1,690.00
33.00 11
_ 363.00
_
33.00 85
_
2,805.00
36.50 36
1,314.00
72.65 3
217.95
--- ------
GE3.1
35.12
24
_842.88
_----"
GE3-1_0-----
GF1-2 "-- --. .. ---
GFt-2H '-- ---- --
GF1-3 -
GF1.4_ _
GF 8...--- -- -----
7.11
_
125
888.75
35.12 4
140AB
45.00 3
135.00
45.00 13
585.00
45.00 7
313.00
45.00 8
_ 270.00
45.00 -- - 5
_ 225.00
G_F1.10
GF1.12
GFA25 -- ----
GFA30---- ---
45.00
6
270.00
45.00 10
450.00
150.00 __- 31
4.650.00
153.11 3
459.33
GG9-1.5 thru GG9.15 kVA
94.23
3
282.69
GG9.25 Om GG950 We
138.00
122
_ _ 16,836.00
GG9.75 8vu G_G9.100 We
GG10-258w_ GG7050 -
GG39.1.5 Owu GG39.15 kVa
185.00
1
185.00
138.00 4
--- 552.00
9423 1
94.23
---
6K1.1
GK14
GM2-1
18.06
821-
_ 35
30
832.10
246.30
821 27
221.67
21.00 S I
105.00
GM2-2 __. ..._..-...-
GM2.11
_--_
11.00
28
_ 308.00
_
18.08 16
288.96
GM2-12 - _-----..----
11.00
9
99.00
z:\dients\georgetown\Ge 21.4\2001-2002 Totals(Neg).xls
Contract No. GEO-00-ED-1 8/19/2003
Unit Constructed
June 1, 2001 - May 31, 2002
with PROPOSED UNIT PRICES
' � �•
unit'
•:,;Prlu" +
•y
:ri`.t4ua�. .` Z 'P
Total = h
GM5-1
GM5.16(336) -- - - -
GM5-8 --_._ --_
GM5.9 ... -._ _
GM5.14 -----
GM5.16 _ - -
GM5.22 -
GM265 '-- -----
GM52-3
8.15
9.50
_ 27.44
27.44
21.00
8.00
8.15
13
_ _ 40
_ _-- 4
_ 5
1
_ _ _ _ 8
1
105.95
380.00
109.76
137.20
21.00
64.00
8.15
42.54 11
467.94
_ _
8.25 1
6.25
GMeter-- _. - --
GM _ HH -'_
5.00
383
1,615.00
104.00 19
1,976.00
GMHH-RKA
GRTM_erer------.. -
342223
11.00._._
45_495.00
787.06
_ 20.00 --- 9
180.00
GTe_mpMebr ------
30.00
60
1,800.00
6UA1 (2') _-
'--
552.28-
3
1,656.84
GUC2 (3.7) ---'
GUC2(3-r) ------
834.20
11
9,17620
95420 2
1,908.40
GUG7 ---- '-'
GUGfl
_
277.83
109
30,283.47
545.17 1
545.17
GUG17-2
739.78
5
3,698.90
GUG17�_
600.86
3
1,802.58
_----------
GUK Service NRS) -- ---
131.40
_
684.16
69.898.62
GUKB__ --- ------- -
67.21
90
6.048.90
305.70
60
_ 18,522.00
GUM1.6C ---_- -_
GUM3E-1-1A -_---
562.28
5
2,811.40
150.90 2
301.80
GUM3-14 ____
71.38
6
428.16
6UMS2 (2') _.. _.. -.-. _
GUM6.1 --- -
GUMB3_ -'-'-- -
460.77
1 1 2
961.54
49.59 403
19,984.77
10920 27
$948.40
GUM6-6_- - - - - - --- -
GUMS -10 - ----------
GUM6.13_8.90
GUM6-15 _ - --
17.63
9
158.67
8.80 89
60720
8
_ 52.60
8.80 22
193.60
GUM621 - _--_-_--
-- 12.73
21
267.33
GUM6-22----- --
12.73
24
305.52
GUM6.23 _- - --
GUM6.24
GUM6.25 --- -
GUM6.33
GUM634
G_UM_rr36 --
GUM33._ ----
GUM50-P-2_
14.28
1
14.28
65.80 8
394.50
65.80 8
_526.40
25.18 10
251.80
1922 42
607.24
21.58 6
13128
177.33 23
4,078.59
0.85 77118
_11.125.4D
GUM50-P-2A -_ - - -
6UM50 P -2B - - ----- - --
GUM50-P-4--_----' -'--
GURU42 (30Yr - - -
1.15
1515
1,742.25
1.65 3714
6.128.10
1.34 120
4.99 See
160.80
3293.40
GUR2-R (30'x12')5.50
5.50
565
3,107.50
GUR2-R(425r8')-___-----
524
5.731
_ 720
1 1 3206
3,772.80
18,370.38
_-
GUR2-R 02'x12')
ziclientstgeorgetow \Geo -21.4020111-2002 TWI$(Neg).xls
Contract No. GEO-00-ED-1 8/19/2003
Unit Constructed
June 1, 2001 - May 31, 2002
with PROPOSED UNIT PRICES
�+4'i 'rt . �.•.:.*
`;_#.. �_.T.i,'3itilu �'�'•:;;._
z +T�$'�pt::Dlldiillty" .�;?�,P ciTfotal�e;'F
GUR2R (427124')
2UR2R(54X24•).._.-..-----
GUR2S (30'x127 - -- _
._ -
---
_ 6.48
-&701
3.00
_ _ _ 120
3440 -
_ 1687
777.60
23.048.00
5,061.00
GUR_2S (42'x127
GUR2S_(42'a47
GUR2S (54')¢47
_ -
3.58
4.14
4.68
2390
_ 1355
547
8,556.20
5,609.70
2.559.96
GUR2S(60'IQ4-)- --
GUR3_______.-._ ._.. _.. -
GURPM
6611-lku _ _
GVA7.01 -- . _
6VA7.011
6VA1-1
6VA7.3 -- -- - -----
_
--
--- -
4.80
1055
5,064.00
0.69 9275
6.399.75
_
137.81 79
10,886.99
8.00 732
5,656.00
_ _
9.00 1 _--`
9.00
7.50 . _. 59
25.49 1
442.50
25.49
_
21.78 _ 13 ---
28288
GVA5.1
38.14
3
114.42
GVA5-1 - -----
GVA5.3
- -
44.37
3
133.11
27.50 12
330.00
_
GVA8.1 _- --'-- ---------
GVC1.11L ------
GVC7.13_ ------------
GVC1.13L - -- _ - -
-
98.00
1
96.00
_
35.07 1
35.07
31.08 35
1,118.88
41.00 1
41.00
GVC221
GVC2.21L -----
GVC2.51-- ----
GVC2.52 ---._...-----
GVC252L ---....-. _. -
----
---
75.50
1
75.50
_
-71.63 1
-
71.63
--
171.78 --
2
343.56
_
69.85 3
209.55
75.50 3
226.50
6VC5.21 ----' --
125.00
4
500.00
GVC5.31 --
145.00
11
_ 1,595.00
GVC5.71 L_--- - ---_
180.99
_
13
_ 2,352.87
GV_C621
307.87
1
307.87
GVC7x
GVC8A - - ---- - -_---
---
-
26620
1
266.20
_
150.00 7
_ 1,050.00
252.39 2
504.78
G7G1.6.251Mu GVG7.8fi0
138.00
_
9
1,242.00
GVG3.1-25 --
350.65
2--'
_ 761.30
5_V133.130
_
536.65
2
_ _ 1,077.30
GVG3.1-75---
GVP7.01�------ --------
---_
640.70
1
640.70
27.44 15
411.60
GVS1.01---....- -
I_D#VOACSR-----
IDR1APLX--
_T_ '- '------
I D #2 ACSR . -...- ---- -
D #2 TPLX ----
I'D 1336 AAC
1 D #336 ACSR ---�--
-
--_
---
- -
--
-
44.00
11
484.00
0.36 9276
- 0.42 .. _^.. 476
0.37 _ 550 _
-- - 0.42 2445
0.53 _ _ 10454
0.5315 4374
3,525.62
200.42
205.59
1.D29.47
5.556.30
2,324.78
-----------
I D 04 ACSR
FD #4 TPL) - - -- --
-
0.35
0.42
9180
500
3211.50
210.53
1 D #4/0 CPLX - ----'
_.. ----'---
N TPLX
C0.33
rDS( DPLX
--
0.49
0.60
0.33
_.__ . 430
428
2964
5081
209.95
215.07
979.84
167.93
zAclientskgewgeto \Geo -21.4\2001-2002 Totals (Ne0).xls
Contract No. GEO-00-ED-1 811912003
Unit Constructed
June 1, 2001 - May 31, 2002
with PROPOSED UNIT PRICES
z:\dients\georgetow \Ge 21.4N2001-2002 Totals (Neg).XJS
Pfic-plim
I D Service
50.00
35 -1.750
. 00
--
6740 7-
i
47750
70.00 20
1,400.00
77.00
20
1,640.00
92.00 14
1.288.00
100.00
12
1200.00
9.67 4
38.68
GAS----.. _ . ----
22.00
a
132.00
GA.5-1
Fmii40.00
37.00
9
333.00
1
40.00
70.00
3
210.00
23.87
190.96
41.36
18
6611.76
53.42 1
53.42
I GC7A99.23
1 GCO
4
398.82
139.07 2
278.14
FGC9-1
23.87
2
47.74
i &E1.1
16.58
15
248.70
FGE1-2
16.58
1 171
2.835.18
1 GE1-2X
16 .58
5
82.90
40.48
323.84
I GE3.118.98
i -GE3.2
IGEi-ili
I GE3-10
6
113.08
16.98
417.56
1
3.94 159
18.98
628.46
fGE5-2
67.56
2
135.12
I GF7-2
10.89
1 29
315.81
1GF1-310.89
to
174.24
1 GF1.$
1 GF1.10
1 GG9-11 -F-GG-115 KVA
10.89
2
21.78
10.98 2
21.96
58.46 1
58.48
I GG9-25 fm 009-50 We_-
--
89.76
15
1,346.40
1 GG10-1.5 THRU 15
58.46
4
233.84
1 GW0-25 thru GG10-W
We
92
8,257.92
1 GG39-1.5 bm GG39-15
58.46
4
233.84
1 GG39-25 ttwu GG39-50
89.76
52
4.667.52
1 GG210-10 t1vu GG210-15 We
145.00
3
435.00
1 GG210-25
1165.00
3
495.00
GG210-75
295.00
1
295.00
GG310-25
19138
3
_580.14
1 GG3110-50
I GG310-75
1 GG310-100
277.41
4
1,109.64
370.00
395.013
193.38
8.763
2
3
1
740.00
1.185.00
1193.38
26.28
1 GG312-15 KVA
FG141.1
FGH3.1
I GK14C
FGM2-1
M;2
rG ji
39.75
4.55
4.58
4.58.
8.761
1
132
1
1 1 3
39.75
4.58
804.56
4.541
2628
30
I I 0
185.10
7
:j.
1752
z:\dients\georgetow \Ge 21.4N2001-2002 Totals (Neg).XJS
Contract No. GEO-00-ED-1 8119/2003
Unit Constructed
June 1, 2001 - May 31, 2002
with PROPOSED UNIT PRICES
I CA2-12
6.17
8 49.36
FG101-5:11 - -
2.76
12
33.12
1 GW2
FGM5-6
1 GMS -9
5.74
5
25.70
5.74 94
15.66 155
2.57 172
539.56
2,427.30
442.04
14.562
5.00
2.63
2.93
114.00
2
18
4
1
29.10
10.00
47.34
11.72
114.00
I GL45-20
I GMS -9
1 GMS -10
125.85
415.00
2
1
-.251.70
415.00
1 GM26-5
22.32
19
424.08
�IG��-3
1.25
23
25.75
1 GMBracket
23.00
1
23.00
GLUter
5.00
58
290.00
GNP -1A
GNP-VC1-1
GPole Mounting
GO3.3
7.00
19
133.00
37.10 1
37.10
6.17 6
49-M
6.35 1
6.35
224A7 1
224A7
GS&wp
5.12
32
163.84
GTeirpMeber
15.00
W
1,320.00
I GUC2 (3-2")
591.90
6
3.551.40
1 GUG17-3
192.14
1
192.14
1 GUM11-51C
251.54 1
1 2
503.08
FGUIV16-1O
IGUMG.V9.38
I-GUM33
33.93
38
1.289.34
7.06 13
91.78
12
112.56
13W2.m23 2
254.46
1 GVA1.01 1
1 G -VA -1.3-
I GVA4.11
5.74
12
68.88
-9.67 9
87.03
52.00 1
--MOD
FG%FA5.1
FGVA5-2
22.00 1
2
44.00
40.00--- 1
40.00
MGVA5.3
I GVC1-1
I GVC1.13L ---23.87
1 GVC2.211 L
IWC -2.5-1-
1�6.52
1 GVC2.52L
1 GVC521
I GVC5.31
I GVC5.71 L
1 GVC6. 21
1 GV&6.51
I GVTCBA
11 iiVCB-2
2.63
12
31.56
39.003
117.00
23.87
23.87 10
238.70
1
39.00 -2
65.00 1
36.65[ 1
42.14 1
41.36 3
53.42 2
99.23 4
139.07 2
152.74 1
152.74 1
15174 11
23.87
79.00
65.00
36-65
42.14
124,08
106.84
396.92
278.14
152 7:
152 7
152.74
z:Wients%goorgeto \Geo -21.4\2001-2002 Totals (Nog).Yls
Contract No. GEO'OV'ED-1 8/19/2003
Unit Constructed
June 1,2VV1'May 31.2V02
with PROPOSED UNIT PRICES
IGVG1-4-25thm5O
89.76
1
89.76
277.41 6
1.664.46
15.
17
256.22
2.57 16
41.12
32.17 1 2
64.34
0.43 1111930
5,11ii.87
N 02 TPLX
0.51
365
iaTAI
0.50 718
3611.12
N04ACSR
0.41
1468
801.15
N #4 TPLX
N 0" QPLX
0.50
1216
611.59
0.60 645
384.00
N-D-W-0-pLx
0.50
1108
548.48
WG30
N G40
100-90
1
100.90
100.90 2
201.80
100.90 3
302.70
N G45
N G50
wklmi
WZi�7:i
120.00
122
14.640.00
130.00 1
130.00
71.63 1
71.63
165.00 3
495.00
N GEI-2
N GE1-2X
36.50
73
2,664.50
36.50 12
438.00
72.65 4
290.60
NGE3-110
NGFF�-i
WGF�J.jo
7.11 go
630.90
45.00 8
360.00
45.00 24
1,080,00
W66i:75
185.00
1
185.00
N GH1.1
21.00
57
1.197.0o
5.21 41
a.21 38
336.61
311 93
8.21 3
24 63
Contract No. GEO-00-ED-1 8119/2003
Unit Constructed
June 1, 2001 - May 31, 2002
with PROPOSED UNIT PRICES
z:\dients\gevgeto \Geo -21.4\2001-2002 Totals (Neg) AS
N GM5-1
8.15
8'
6520
NGM5.1BT95
11.75
_- 271
317.25
N GM"
27.44
6
164.64
N GM5r9 --- --
38.75
8
310.00
N GM5.14 - - - -
21.00
1
21.00
N -GMB -9
204.67
1
204.67
N_GM26-5 -----
42.54
31
1,318.74
N GM26.18
45.00
3
135.00
N GM52-3-
6.25
167
1,043.75
N GM41H
50.00
799
39.950.00
N GM13RACKET
37.50
29
1,087.50
N GNP -IA-
12.56
_ 54
67824
N_G_P2.1
......11.00
30
330.00
12.00
62
744.00
N GSTBASE-HD_
125.00'
16
2,000.00
NGTC --- _
25.00
42
1.050.00
-- ..-------
N GVA1.01
9.1-5
49
448.35
N_GVA1.011
9.001
6
54.00
N GVA1.3 --_---
-
21.76
2
43.52
N GVA4.1--
- 102.50
1
102.50
N GVA5-2
47.00
8
376.00
N GVA5.3
25.00 -
1
25.00
N GVA6.1
_ 98.00
1
96.00
_
N GVC 1.13
91.08'
2
W-16
_
N GVC2.21
75.50
1
75.50
145.00
2
_ 290.00
N_GVC6.21
307.87
1
307.87
N GVE1.1 -_--
36.50
1
36.50
N GVG1.4-25 Bwu GVG1.4-50 KVA
138.00
29
4,00200
NGVGI.6.2 --
138.00
10
1,380.00
N GVG1.5.25 ---
138.00
13
1,794.00
_
N GVG1.6.25 Ovu N GVG7.&50
138.00
3
414.00
_
N GVG2.1-25
244.46
5
1,222.30
N GVG21-50 KVA
267.51
1
257.51
_
N GVG3.1-25 KVA
380.65
_ 2
761.30
N GVG3.1-50 KVA
538.65
7
3,770.55
_
N GV63.1-75
640.70
4
2,562.80
_
N GVG3.1-1000 KVA---
688.00
2
1,336.00
NGVG32d0
538.65
1
538.65
N GVP1.01
27.44
130
3.567.20
N G_VS1.01- -_---
38.75
129
4,996.75
N GVS2. 11
168.75
1
168.75
N GVS2.32 ----- -
596.07
1
598.07
_
N GVy3.3
565.00
1
565.00
QCATV -
28.00
3
54.00
C: GGTE -- ----
28.00
_ 4
11200
O GK -14
12.78
41
51.12
G GM5-6
43.12
1
- ---
43.12
-.---.__
Q GM5-9 -
43.12
1
-- -
43.12
G GSM: --- -
171.40
_- 1
171.40
Q GSM - L ._-----
50.21
6
301.26
z:\dients\gevgeto \Geo -21.4\2001-2002 Totals (Neg) AS
Contract No. GEO-00-ED-1 8119/2003
Unit Constructed
June 1, 2001 - May 31, 2002
with PROPOSED UNIT PRICES
Unit,
Price
Quantity- ..'
Pd4eTotal
0 GSt.Lt
46.58
4
... _ 186.32
0 Trans
137.81
1
137.81
5M1M ACSR
7,88
4
31.52
S #336 AAC
12.73
114
1.45122
S x795 AAC
15.40
3
46.20
EOUIPMENTIHOURLY
Aerial Basket Truck
55.12
9
496.08
Nr Compressor
44.10
26
1.146.60
Backhoe (114 yr(f.)
44.10
79
3,483.90
Dump truck haul sand
44.10
127
_5.6m ia-
Equipment Operator
22.75
148
3.367.00
FIalbed Truck
15.43
3
46.29
Lineman 1st Class
35.28
252.5
8,908.20
Lineman's Helper
20.84
451.5
9.409.26
Water Trailer
44.10
2
88.20
UNIT TOTAL
740,667.44
z:lcientslgeorgetown\Ce 21.412001-2002 Totals (Neg).xls
Contract No. GEO-00-ED-1
Unit Constructed
June 1, 2001 - May 31, 2002
with PROPOSED UNIT PRICES
8119/2003
Not Units (Has dWr 30% Adder Incl)
Price
Hot Price $
Quan"
Price Total
D#1/OACSR
0.43
0.56
2
1.12
D #336 AAC
0.56
0.72
714
516.31
D #4 ACSR
0.41
0.53
300
159.71
D #4/0 ACSR
0.57
0.74
21
15.46
D #795 AAC
0.58
0.75
_ 13341
10,002.75
UD #4/0 AI 15-25
1.26
1.64
450
737.10
G35
100.90
131.17
2
262.34
G40
_
100.90
131.17
3
393.51
G45
120.00
156.00
37
5,772.00
G50
130.00
169.00
5
845.00
res
_
146.00
189.80
1
189.80
B(336)
B(795)
.011
•1
.3
.1
.2
.1
13
31
.11L
.13
.1
4iX
21L
35.07
45.59 _
3136.77
75.50
98.15
1
98.15
75.50
98.15
1
98.15
145.00
188.50
3
565.50
165.00
214.50
1
214.50
185.50
241.15
1
241.15
307.87
400.23
2
800.46
252.39
328.11
1
328.11
137.10
178.23
21
356.46
10.50
13.65
32
436.80
11.75
15.28
391
595.73
9.00
11.70
7
81.90
8.15
10.60
20
211.90
49.59
64.47
18
1,160.41
21.88
28.44
3
85.33
9.00
11,70
235
2,749.50
9.00
11.70
27
315.90
25.49
33.14
1
33.14
21.76
28.29
1
2829
30.00
39.00
1
39.00
34.00
44.20
1
4420
_
38.14
49.58
2
99.16
47.D0
$1.10
1
61.10
47.00
61.10
152
9,287.20
_
60.00
78.00
2
156.00
42.50
55.25
1
55.25
39.29
51.08
4
204.31
126.00
163.80
1
163.80
35.07
45.59
2
91.18
_
31.08
40.40 _
4 _
161.62
-- 67.73
$8.05
1
68.05
64.11
83.34
1
83.34
71.63
93.12
22
2.048.62
69.85
90.81
1
90.81
75.50
98.15
4
392.60
_
145.00
188.50
12
2.262.00
165.00
214.50
_ 9
1,930.50
180.99
235.29
51
1,176.44
307.87
400.23
1
_ 400.23
185.50
241.15
3
723.45
_
252.39
328.11
31
984.32
z.\clientslgeorgetownlGeo-21.412001-2002 Total$ (N89)Jd3
Contract No. GEO-00-ED-1
Unit Constructed
June 1, 2001 - May 31, 2002
with PROPOSED UNIT PRICES
8/19/2003
Hot Units (Has their 30% Adder Incl)
Price
Hot Price $ - -
-- -Quantity
Price Total
GVP1.01
27.44
35.67
140
4,994.08
GVS1.01
38.75
50.38
157
7,908.88
1 D #1/0 ACSR
-_ 0.38
0.49
11800
5,830.43
1 D #336 AAC
0.53
0.69
372
256.31
I G30
_ _
89.50
116.35
1
116.35
1 G35
_
89.50
116.35
21
_ 2,443.35
1 G40
- 89.50
116.35
28
3,257.80
1 G45
116.00
150.80
22
3,317.60
1 G50
116.00
150.80
2
301.60
1 GA1
9.67
12.57
3
37.71
1 GA3
20.90
-
27.17
1
27.17
1 GA4
62.00
80.60
2
16120
1 GA5-1
45.00
58.50
2
117.00
1 GA5-2
45.00
58.50
_ 2
117.00
1'I1 G01
20.35
26.46
3
--
79.37
---
'I GB7
--- 58.00
75.40
1
75.40
I GC1
23.87
31.03
37
1.148.15
I GC1-1
39.00
50.70
1
50.70
I GCI -2
23.87
31.03
3
93.09
I GCI -4
_
23.87
31.03
1
31.03
I GC2
36.65
47.65
1
47.65
i GC2-1
36.65
47.65
1
47.65
1 GC2-2
42.14
54.78
1
54.78
I GC7
41.36
53.77
_ 9
483.91
I GC7A
99.23
129.00
5
645.00
1 GC7X
99.23
129.00
_ 1--
129.00
1 GC7-1
53.42
69.45
1
69.45
1 GC8
139.07
180.79
11
1.988.70
1 GM3-15
297.79
387.13
2
774.25
1 GMS -1
2.76
3.59
1
3.59
1 GMS -2
5.74
7.46
146
1,089.45
1 GM5-5
5.74
7.46
151
_ 1.126.76
1 GM5-6
15.66
20.36
113
2.300.45
1 GM5-9
257
3.34
123
410.94
1 GM5-14
14.55
18.92
2
37.83
1 GMS•20
2.63
3.42
163
557.30
1 GM5.22
2.93
3.81
9
_ 34.28
1 GM52-3
1.25
1.63
2
3.25
1 GNP-tA
7.00
9.10
4
36.40
1 GNP -81
18.50
24.05
1
24.05
I GNP -B7
32.24
41.91
_ 2
83.82
1 GNP -C8
170.00
221.00
5
1,105.00
I GNP VC8
170.00
221.00
1
221.00
1 GSUr p
5.12
6.88
90
599.04
1 GVA1.011
_ 5.74
7.46
3
22.39
1 GVA14
16.43
21.36
_ 1
21-361
1 GVA1.3
9.67
12.57
4 _
50.28
1 GVA4.1
62.00
80.60
_ 3
241.80
1 GVA5.1
22.00
26.60
9
257.40
1 GVA5-2
_ 45.00
58.50
1
58.50
I GVA5.3
2.63
3.42
10
34,19
1 GVB5.21
58.00
75.40
1
75.40
z:%dientslpeorgetown%Geo-21.412001-2002 Totals (Neg).zls
Contract No. GEO-00-ED-1
Unit Constructed
June 1, 2001 -May 31, 2002
with PROPOSED UNIT PRICES
8119/2003
Hot Units (Hae their 30% Adder Ind)
Price
Hot Price S
Quan"
Price Total
I GVC1-1
39.00
50.70
6
_ 304.20
1 GVC1.11L
23.87
31.03
7
217.22
1 GVC1.13
23.87
31.03
1
31.03
1 GVC1.13L
23.87
31.03
1
31.03
1 GVC2.21
36.65
47.65 _
_ 1
47.65
1 GVC2.21L
39.00
50.70
4
202.60
1 GVC2.52L
_
42.14
54.78
1
54.78
I GVC5.21
41.36
53.77
3
_-_ 161.30
1 GVC5.31
53.42
69.45
4
277.78
1 GVC5.71L
99.23
129.00
2
258.00
1 GVC6.21
139.07
180.79
1
180.79
11 GVC7X
_
99.23
129.00
5
645.00
II GVC9.2
36.65
47.65
1
47.65
1 GVP1.01
_
15.66
20.36
6
122.15
1 GVS1.01
2.57
3.34
9
30.07
N 11/0 ACSR
0.43
0.56
2000
1,119.30
N #336 AAC
_
0.57
0.74
8000
5.889.00
N N4 ACSR
0.41
0.53
15
7.99
N G40
_
100.90
131.17
5
655.85
N G45
120.00
156.00
55
8,580.00
N G50
_
130.00
169.00
5
845.00
N GC1
31.08
40.40
1
40.40
N GC1-1
67.73
88.05
2
176.10
N GCI -3
71.63
93.12
2
186.24
N GC7
145.00
188.50
4
754.00
N GC7A
180.99
235.29
1
- -- -
235.29
N GC8
307.87
400.23
1
40023
N GE3.2
35.12
45.68
1
_ 45.66
N GM5-1
8.15
10.60
22
233.09
N GM5-1B (336)
10.50
13.65
6
81.90
N GMS -20
25.00
32.50
38
1,235.00
N GM5-22
8.15
10.60
12
127.14
N GNP -1-A
12.56
16.33
4
65.31
N GVA1.01
9.15
11.90
36
428.22
N GVA1.011
_ 9.00
11.70
68
795.60
N GVA1-1
25.49
33.14
1
33.14
N GVA1.3
21.76
28.29
3
84.86
N GVA221
42.50
55.25
1
5525
N GVA4.1
_
102.50
133.25
6
_ 799.50
N GVA5.1
_
38.14
49.58
8
396.66
N GVA5-1
44.37
57.68
8
461.45
N GVA5.2
_ _ 47.00
61.10
1
_ 61.10
N GVA5.3
25.00
32.50
10
325.00
N GVA6.1
98.00
127.40
2
254.80
N GVA7X
_ 60.00
78.00
1
78.00
N GVB1.13
39.29
51.08
2
_ 1D2.15
N GVC1-1
67.73
88.05
4
352.20
N GVC1.13
31.08
40.40
15
606.06
N GVC2.21
75.50
98.15
3
294.45
N GVC2.21L
71.63
93.12
13
1,210.55
N GVC2.52L
75.50
98.15
1
98.15
N GVC5.21
_
145.00
108.50
5
942.50
z:ldlents%georgetownIGeo-21.412001.2002 Totals (Neg).xis
Contract No. GEO-00-ED-1 819/2003
Unit Constructed
June 1, 2001 - May 31, 2002
with PROPOSED UNIT PRICES
Hot Units (Has their 30% Adder Incl)
Price
Not Nos $
Quantity
Price Total
N GVC5.71L
180.99
235.29
1
23529
N GVC6.21
307.87
400.23
12
4.802.77
N GVCBA
252.39
328.11
3
984.32
N GVC9-2
6774
88.06
1
68.06
N GVP1.01
27.44
35.67
37
1,319.86
N GVS1.01
38.75
50.38
50
2.518.75
Q GUrd. Pn. (110 Al 1525)
700.31
910.40
1
910.40
D GPdmary DE
15.94
20.72
33
683.83
S #110 ACSR
7.88
10.24
89
911.72
S 11336 AAC
12.73
16.55
63
1.042.59
HOT UNIT TOTAL
135,141.63
z %dientslpeorgetownlGeo-21.412001-2002 Totals (Nap)ads
Contract No. GEO-00-ED-1 8/1912003
Units Constructed
June 1, 2001 - May 31, 2002
with EXISTING UNIT PRICES
z:kcAientst0eor0etow kGeo-21.4t2001.2002 Totals (Ne0).As
D 91/0 ACSR
0.45000 1
14646
6,590.70
6-9i/0 TPLX
0.53912
_ 468
_ - _ 25231
D 92 TP -LX- ..
0.52809
386
203.81
D 9338 AAC --
0.59456
_
16719
_ 9,940.45
_
D 9350 MCM OPIX
0.61740 1
190
117.31
D #4 ACSR - - - - -
0.42997
6812
_ 2,84296
D 94 TPLX - -- ----
D 94/0 TPLX
D 96 DPLX -----__
- 0.52109
775
40927
0.56432 400
_ _ 233.73
0.49502 750
37127
09795 AAC .. _-_- -
6GsWWo -_--- _--_ --_
UD 91/0 AI 15.25 kV
UD 91A AI UPLX -
UD 9110 Al TPLX -
UD 112-2 Ce _ _
UD 94M N 15.25 kV Primary
0.62763
2315
1,452.96
47.00 31
1.457.00
_
1.07 38507
41,20249
-- 1.25 150 _
187.50
1.12 7406A
_-_ . 8,295.17
0.42 2825
1,186.50
1.26 20217
25,473.42
UD 0" N TPLX
1.12
14188
15,890.56
UD 9350 MCM_AI
1.17
1265.6
1,450.75
_ _ _
UD 9500 MCM 15-25 Kv
2.15
8180
13,287.00
G30_-.. -...-._ -.
55.15
4
_ 220.60
635 -_.--_._-----
70.55
8
564.40
G40 `---- --------
645
G50
GE1.1 _ _
GE1-2 _
GE1-2X
GE2.01 -
GE3.1 -- _
GE_3.10 - --�
GE12-X - -- - - - --- -
GF1-2--
GFI- -- -_ - _-
GF1.8 _
GF1.10_
GF1.12 - - - -- --...-
GFA25 _
GFA30 _
GG9-1-5 Mm GG9.15 kVA _
GG9.25 Wu GG950 We _
GG9-75 thra GG9-100 Wa
91.50
19
1.738.50
102.53 F 41
4,203.73
108.04 13
1,404.52
30.60 11
336.60
30.80 85
2,601.00
43.22 36
_
1.555.92
78.28 3
228.84
76.26 24
1,830.72
7.10 1 125
887.50
41.84 4
168.56
_
39.14 3
_
117.42
115.17 13
1,49711
39.14 7
273.95
42.00 6
252.00
_
39.14 5
_
195.70
_
39.14 6
_ 234.84
42.00 _. 10
420.00
150.00 31
4,650.00
153.11 3
_
459.33
_
94.22 3
282.66
134.26 122
16,379.72
17811 1
17811
GG10.250au GG 1050 --
134.26
4
537.04
_--
GG39-1.5 Bvu GG39.15 kVa
GH1.1 ------_--
GK1.1811
GK14
GW -1
_
9412
1
94.22
18.06 35
632.10
_
30
246.30
811 27
18.06 5
221.67
90.30
GW -2 _--
GWAt - --- - ----
GMC -12 - - -- - ---
9.61
28
26618
18.08 18
_ 288.96
9.81 91
85.59
z:kcAientst0eor0etow kGeo-21.4t2001.2002 Totals (Ne0).As
Contract No. GEO-00'EO^1 0/13/2003
Units Constructed
June 1,2001^May 31,ZV02
with EXISTING UNIT PRICES
GM5-1
GIV15-118 (336)
GM5-6
5.36
5.85
27.43
13
40
4
69.68
234.00
109.72
GIV15-9
27.43
5
137.15
GIA5-14
16.45
1
16.45
GM5.18
6.55
a
52.40
GMS -22
OM26-5
5.37
1
5.37
42.54 11
467.94
Water
6.00
363
1.815.00
GMHH
GhiHH-iiK
GRTMeter
104.00
19
1.976.00
34.22 23
9.51 45
787.06
427.95
20.00 9
180.00
GTonpMeter
3D.DO
Go
1,800.00
GUG7
277.83 109
30.283.47
GUG17
545.74
1
545.74
GUG17-2
GUG1174
739.78
5
3,698.90
60D.86 3
1,8=58
66K Serv" UF6)
131.40
689.16
90.5%.62
GUK6
6721
90
6.048.90
GUIV11-51D
308.70
OD
18.522.00
GUMI-6C
56228
5
2.811.40
GUM3E-1- 1A
15D.90
2
301.80
GUKW
491%
403
19,984.77
GUM6-3
109.70 1
27
2,961.90
17.63 9
1158.67
GUMS -10
6.80
69
607.20
GIJM�115
8.80 22
193.60
GUM6-2�
12.73
21
267.33
GUN16-22
WMI�M
12.73
24
305.52
14.28 1
1428
GUM6-24
GUW�25
65.80
6
394.80
65.80 a
526.40
GUM6-33
GUMO-34
25.18
10
251.80
1922 42
007.24
GUMS -36
GUM33
21.88
131.20
177.33 23
4.078.59
GUM50-P-2
0.65
17118
1.125.40
GUM50-P-2A
11.15
1515
1.74225
GUM50-P-28
1.65
3714
6.128.10
GUR2-R (30W)
'1.34
4.99
120
6601
ISOM
3.293.4
GUR2-R(Wx11r)
5.50
3.107.50
GVA1.01
GVA1.011
GVA7-1 -
GVA1.3
6VA5.1 -- ----...-
Contract No. GEO-00-ED-1
Units Constructed
June 1, 2001 - May 31, 2002
with EXISTING UNIT PRICES
4.
1-
_. 421 _.. 59'
25.49 .... 1
.21.76. _ 13.
36.14 3
44.37 3
2730 -_- r - _.-. _.. 12'
65.31 t
35.07 1
>lu.4z
133.11
327.60
31.08
36
_ 1,11_6.66
...-41.06
41.06.
1-
GVC5.31 _-
67.69
1
67.60
71.841
GVC5.711.
I 180.98
_
- _- 70.65
2
.__..__71_66
141.30
307.87
59.84 !
3 _
209.52
G_V_C6.31
74.84
3
224.52
GVC521
80.23
4
320.92
GVC5.31 _-
96.931
-_ t1.
1,08623
GVC5.711.
I 180.98
13
2.352.74
_GVC621____
307.87
1
-.
307.87
G_V_C6.31
266.20
1
265.20
GVC7X
- ----
36.58
7
256.06
GVC8A
252.38.
--
2
504.76
u^VGf.6251hN GVG1.650
13426
9
1,206.34
_
�Y-....-
-----
-
GVG3.1-ZS
380.83`
2
76126
GVG3.1S0
I 538.821
1
2
72
1.07724
_..--- ----
GVG3.1-75
-- - --
640.66
----'--- --
--...--
1
-
640.68
�GVP1.01 -- -
_
27.43
I
.........__ .......
_ 15
........41-
111.45
GWI.01
27.43it
_
301.73
I D 6110 ACSR _ _ _
O.eO _
r ._
_ _9276
3,710.40
10 #1/0 TPLX
0.45_
476
21420
I D #2 ACSR
0.39
550
214.50
I D 02 TPLX
--
0.451
2145
1100.25
---
I_D 11336 AAC --
0.55
_
10454
5,749.70
I D #336 ACSR
0.5355
2,342.28
_
_4374.
1 D 04 ACSR
----
0.37
9160
3,389.20
10 #4 TPLX
0.42
500
210.00
I D #4/0 QPLX
0,51
430j
219.30
TPILX-
0.501
4261
..288
214.00
1 D #6 Cu_
0 3'
4
979.64,
1 D 06 DPLX
0.331
I
5061
167.641
z:%disntslpsa0atamMeo-21.412001.2002 Totals (Ne0)AS
Contract No. GEO-00-ED-1 81192003
Units Constructed
June 1, 2001 - May 31, 2002
with EXISTING UNIT PRICES
Z:%dient$VoorgetDvM1G88-21.4=1-2002 Tota[3 (Neg).Xis
I D Servim
IGn-
50.00
41.90
37
7
1,850.00
293.30
1 G35
1 G40
48.51
63.95
20
20
970.20
1,279.00
1 G45
1 G50
I GAI
1 GAS_15.17
I-lmi
67.25
77.18
9.67
2222
14
12
4
6
9
941.50
926.16
3&68
91.02
199.98
1 GA5-2
1 GA6
25.46
37A2
1
3
25.48
11226
I -acl
I G C7-
I GC7-1
23.87
1"
53.42
16
1
190.96
-66V6
53.42
1 GC7A
99.23
4
396,92
139.07
2
278.14
1 GC9-1
22.42
2
44.84
1 6ii.l
16.56
15
248.70
1 GE7-2
HGEl-2X
I GE2-2
I GE3-2
16.55
23.33
40.48
We
18.98
171
5
8
6
22
2.835.18
116.65
323.84
113.88
417.56
1 GE3-2S
1 GE3-10
-1605
26.61
4.14
80.67
1
159
2
26.61
65826
161.34
1 GF1.2
10.89
29
315.81
I-GFi-3
10.89
16
17424
1 GNA
10.89
2
21.78
I GF1.10
10.89
2
21.78
1 GG9-1.5-OG-15 KVA
48.78
11
48.78
I GG9-25 dwu GG950 kVa
73.25
15
1.09&75
1 GGI0-1.5 THRU 15
48.76
4
195.12
I GGIO-25 thru GGI050
73.25
92
8.739.08
1 GG39-1.5 deu GG39-15
48.78
4
195.12
1 GG39-25 thm GG39-50
73.25
52
3.809.00
1 GG210-10 Ovu GG210-15 We
98.73
3
290.19
I GG210-25
1 GG210-75
126.35
172.00
3
1
379.05
172.00
1 GG310-25
193.35
4
T73.52
I GG31050
277.41
4
1M09.64
I GG310.75
322.42
2
644.84
I GG310.100
335.88
3
1.007.64
1 G0312-15 KVA
220.30
I
220.30
-16HIA
10.89
3
MAT
MH3.1
40.04
1
40.04
1 GKIA4
1 6K14
4.58
1
132
458
604 56
1 G4(14C
4.56
1
4.58
I
8.76
3
2628
1 GM2-2
6.17
30
185.10
I GM2-11
10.89
2
21.78
Z:%dient$VoorgetDvM1G88-21.4=1-2002 Tota[3 (Neg).Xis
(�_ ni a G1' .n C) � a (,_� I G_� � _ G_� .4] V7
] (G] < <I<;G yGy < yG yGy < C ;
01 N N q /J fJ fJ iJ + + + A i + +
G7 G7
C CI;
�
C
.n
�
a
�f
G]
NIZ
G)
� i � .G)
�
Gf
Ai
C) "
�
O .A
�V iI.
Ib
01
P
V7
�
'
n1
i
I I I
I
NNq Na P (4(..1 Oqq ({,J� �{y,.�1�
+ 0N do 0q 'Log
Vp
$P,.
(P�
�1
V
ST fJ
O
4N1
CN oN
fmi
qN
tVt'' (P�
P� N F H W V# m Y O V �J J N tJ O
�Wp
Ol !J
(+t
A�
t
H
H
N
V
P
0
O
H
H H
H
N
O Q+
O
W
r i
I
i
((o�
P
N
J
P
��pp
N�
J
.�
P+
(O
pp��
O+
qq
tJ
�
O+
N
J
t
d N N
vv
N
qq
P•
��pp
d
N
P
9
N N P
+
N
+
O
Wm
•
V
tI
O t0
V
+VV
♦
W
N m O� 0ryO1 N N CO 1D m p0p�1� 'OgNqI (N�
S P
O
pW
m•
S
H
A
V
CQyI
d♦
qq+
O$
H H
H
p•o1
0
H 0+
pP
O
(V� at aO
Y: ♦ N
P�
O
(V�
O
,qR
m
(PJB
O
N
p+p�
W♦
n
0
Z
0
O
m
O
b
0
m
O
21
57
N
O
w
Contract No. GEO-00^ED^1 0/19/2003
Units Constructed
June 1,2O01 ' May 31.20OZ
with EXISTING UNIT PRICES
48.78
1
48.7a
IGVG1.5-1.5THRUIS
�GVG3.1-50
277.41
1,664.46
1 GVS1.01
15.55
17
264.35
14 OlR
N 0110 TPLX
0.45
11930
5,W8.50
0.54 365
197.10
hiiinux
0.53
718
380.54
N 04 ACSR
0.43
1468
63124
IN 04 TPLX
0.53
128S
681.58
OPLX
0.60
645
IN "M TPLX
0.68
80
46.40
W15-46-DPLx,
0.50
1108
554,00
IN G30
68.35
1
W35
IN G35
100.00
2
2DO.00
N G40
IN GEI-2X
GE2.11
102.53
3
_W7.59
113.55 122
13,15W.110
52.39 1
2W-39
43.23 12
516.76
7028 7
533.96
N
7.11
90
639.90
39.14 a
313.12
N�iFIAO
39.14 24
939.36
4GWO-1.5
94.23
1
94.23
4GG310-W
5W63
1
538.63
4 GHIA
4-6j;A
18.06
57
1.029.42
7.90 41
323.90
8.211
30
311.98
Contract No. GEO-00-ED-1 8/19/2003
Units Constructed
June 1, 2001 - May 31, 2002
with EXISTING UNIT PRICES
t y'li*
,.;
bii .P
N GM5-1
5.37'
8
42.96
NGMS1B795i
_
7.14
27
192.76
N GMS -6
.__
27.44
_
_ 6
164.64
NGM5.9
27.44
_ _ 8
219.52
N GM5-14
16.45
1
_ 16.45
N GMB -9-- - -- ---
204.67
_ 1
_ 204.67
N GM26-5
42.54
_
31
1,31&74
N GM26.18
45.00
3
135.00
N GM52-3
5.00'
167
moo
_ -..
N GM4tH
13.23
659
11,38437
_
N GMBRACKET
37.50;
29
--
1,08730
NGNP-IA ._-----_..
12.56:
54
67824
N GP2.1 -
9.51'
_ 30
285.30
N GPGM --_ -. ..--
12.001
62
744.00
N GSTBASE 4D _--
-
125.001
18
2.000.00
N_GTC - --
25.00"
_ 42
1.050.00
N GVA1.01 - - -__---
6.55,
_ 49
320.95
N GVA1.011
4.21
6
2526
_
N GVA1.3
21.76
_ 2
4332
_
N GVA4.1.__ --'
80.01
1
80.01
N GVA5.2-- -
47.00
a
37&00
N GVA5.3
5.58
-� 1
5.58
N GVA6.1----- -
55.31
1
65.31
N GVC 1.13 - - -
31.08
2
W-16
36.65
1
36.65
N GVC521 - --- ...
80.23
2
160.46
N GVCB•21 - -
307.87
1
307.87
N_GVE1.1---_--- --
30.61
1
30.61
N GVG_i,M251M0 GVG1.4.50 KVA
13426
29
3,893.54
-.. _ _.-----
N GVG1.5-2
94.23
10
942.30
_
N GVG1.5.25 -
134.28
13
1,745.38
N GVG1.6.25 „ru N GVG1.6.50
13426
3
40278
_
N GVG21.25
225.74
5
1,128.70
_
N GVG2.1.50 KVA
267.51
_ 1
267.51
_ _
N GVG3.1-25 KVA
380.64
2
781.26
_ _
N GVG3.1-50 KVA
538.63
1
3,770.41
N GVG3.1-75
640.67-
2.51V•G
N GVG3.1-1_000 KVA
688.98.
_. 1,337.96
N GVG3.2-50 '------- -- '--
543.43
t
543.43
N GVP1.01 --
27.44
130
3,56720
N GVS1.01
27.44
130 _..
3.567.20
N GVS2.31 _ --
473.64
_ 1
473.64
__-
N GVS2.32
498.07
t
496.07
N GVY3.3
418.55
t
418.55
0CATV_-_-.
28.00
_ 3
84.0_0
p GGM -- -
28.00
4
112.00
Q GK -14
12.78
4
51.12
p GM541
43.12
-_ _ -_-_ t
43.12
p GMSA_
43.12
-- -. t
43.12
_....------'
p GSec
171.4 0
WGSM _--..__
50211
6
30126
Ltd lmbpsorpetown%Ge 21.4\2001-2002 Toho Oft).46
Contract No. GEO-00•ED•1 8/19/2003
Units Constructed
June 1, 2001 - May 31, 2002
with EXISTING UNIT PRICES
Unit
Price
Quantity
Price Total •': —
O GSt.Li
45 58
4
186.32
Q Trans
137.61
1
137.81
S #1/0 ACSR
- 96
I 4
31.5_2
S 9336 AAC
;'73
114
1,451.22
S 9795 AAC
3
46.20
EQUIPMENT/HOURLY -
Aerial Basket Truck
55.12
9
446.08
Air Compressor
44.10r
281
1.146.60
Backhoe 11/4 yrd.)
44.10':
79'.
.__. 3,483.00
Dump truck maul sand
44.10.
127
_5,800.70
Equipment Operator
2084.
148
3.084.32
Fialt,ed Truck
1543
3
48.29
Lineman 1st Class
28.66
252.5
7,238.88
Lmaman's Helper
2084.
451.5,
9,10928
.8820
Water Trailer
44 10
i-. 2.
UNITTOTAL
703,323.16
z:Wientstgeorgetown Geo -21.412001-2002 Totals (Neg).zis
Contract No. GEO-00-ED-1 8/1912003
Units Contracted
June 1, 2001 - May 31, 2002
with EXISTING UNIT PRICES
Hot Units (Has their 30% Adder Incl)
Price
Hot Price $
Quantity
Price TOW
D #170 ACSR
0.45
0.59
2,
1.17
D #336 AAC
0.59
0.77
714
547.64
D 04 ACSR
0.43
0.56
300
167.70
D #410 ACSR
0.59
0.77
21
1823
D #795 AAC
0.63
0.82
13341
10,92628
UO #410 AJ 15.25
- 1.28
1.64
450
_ 737.10
G35
70.55
91.72
2
183A3
G40
91.50
118.95
3
358.85
G45
102.53
133.29
37
4,931.69
G50
108.04
140.45
5
702.26
G55
121.27
157.65
1
157.65
GCI -2
35.07
45.59
3
136.77
GC2
88.00
1
88.00
GC2-2
74.84
97.29
1
47__
GC7
104.30
3
312.90
GC7-1
126.02
1
_128.02
GC7X
47.55
1
47.55
GC -8
307.87
400.23
2
800.40
GC8.2
252.38
328.09
1
326.09
GE5-2
1.37.09
17822
2
356.43
GM5-IS (336)
5.85
7.61
32
243.38
GM5-18 (795)
7.14
928
39
382.00
GM5.5
4.21
5.47
7
38.31
GMS -22
5.37
6.96
20
139.62
GUM6-11
49.59
64.47
18
1,1.60.41
GUMS -36
21.88
2BA4
3
85.33
GMAT
6.55
8.52
235
$001.03
GVA1.011
4.21
5.47
27
1.47.77
GVA1-I
25.49
33.14
1
33.14
GVA1.3
21.76
2829
1
_ 28.29
GVA2.1
26.62
34.87
1
3497
GVA32
31.79
41.33
1
41.33
GVA5.1
38.14
49.58
2
99.16
GVA5.2
47.00
81.10
1
61.10
GVA5.3
27.30
35,49
152
5,3&1.48
GVA7X
51.47
2
102.93
GV81-I
_39.59
39.29
51.08
1
51.08
GVS1.13
26.60
34.58
4
_ 138.32
GVB5.31
71.M
92.87
1
92.87
GVCI.IIL
35.07
45.59
2
91.18
GVC1.13
31.08
40.40
4
161.62
GVCI-1
67.73
88.05
1
88.05
GVCI-RX
_
64.11
63.34
1
83.34
GVC2.211-
71.64
93.13
22
2,048.90
GVC252
69.84
90.79
1
90.79
GVC2.52L
74.84
97.29
4
389.17
GVC52i
80.23
104.30
12
1,251.59
GVC5.31
96.93
126.01
_ 9
1,134.08
GVCS.7IL
180.98
235.27
5
__ 1,176.37
GVC6.21
307.87
400.23
1
400.23
GVC7X
36.56
47.55
3
142.66
GVCBA
252.36
328.09
3
98428
z:%dlents\9eor9eto \Geo -21.4\2001.2002 Totals(Ne9).xls
Contract No. GEO-00-ED-1
Units Contracted
June 1, 2001 - May 31, 2002
with EXISTING UNIT PRICES
8/19/2003
Not Units (Has 111sir30%Adder kid)
--- Price
Hot Price$
Qum*
Price Total
GVP1.01
27.43
35.66
140
4,982.26
GVS1.01
27.43
35.66
157
5,59BA6
I D #1/0 ACSR
0.40
0.52
11800
6,136.00
1 D #336 AAC
0.55
0.72
372
265.98
1 G30
_
54.47
1
54.47
I G35
46.51
63.06
27
1,702.70
I G40
63.95
83.14
25
2.327.78
I G45
67.25
87.43 _
22
1,923.35
I G50
77.18
100.33
2
- -
200.67
I GA1
9.67
12.57
-
3
37.71
I GA3
20.90
27.17
1
27.17
I GA4
23.22
30.19
2
50.37
1 GA5.1
22.22
28.89
2
57.7_7
I GA5-2
25.48
33.12 _
2
66.2_5
I G81
_ 20.35
26.46
3
79.37
1 G87
29.33
38.13
-
1
38.13
1 GC1
23.87
31.03
37
1,148.15
1 GCt-1
30.19
39.25
1
3925
1 GC1.2
26.54
34.63
3
103.80
1 GC1.4
29.26
38.04 _
1
36.04
1 GC2
36.65
47.65
1
47_65
1 GC2-1
39.25
51.03
1
51.03
1 GC2-2
_
42.14
54.78
7
353.47
1 GC7
41.36
53.77
9
-
483.91
I GG7A
98.23
129.00
5
-- -
845.00
I GC7X
25.83
1
25.63
I GC7-1
53.42
69.45
1
69.45
1 GC8
139.07
180.79
_ 11
1,988.70
I GM3-15
297.79
387.13
2
774.25
1 GM5.1
3.58
1
3.58
1 GM5.2
3.30
4.29
146
628.34
1 GM&5
2.22
2.89
151
435.79
1 GM5-6
15.66
20.36
113
2,300.45
1 GM5.9
15.55
20.22
123
2,488.45
I GMS -14
9.71
12.62
2
2525
1 GM5-20
2.63
3.42
_ 163
557.30
--
1 GMS -22
2.93
3.81
9
3_4._28
1 GM52-3
_
9.00
11.70 _
_ 2
23.40
1 GNP -1A
7.35
9.56 _
_ 4
38.22
1 GNP431
14.50
18.85
1
18.85
1 GNP -87
32.24
41.91
2
83.82
1 GNP -CB
115.50
150.15
5
750.75
1 GNP VCB
115.50
150.15
1
150.15
1 Gump
_ 5.12
6.66
90
599.04
1 GVA1A11
2.22
2.89
_ 3
8.66
1 GVA7-1
21.36
1
21.36
1 GVA7.3
12.57 _
4
50.28
1 GVA4.1
K-19
3
90.57
1 GVA5.1
15.17
19.72
_ 9
177.49
1 GVA5.2
25.48
33.12 _
1
33.12
I GVA5.3
2.63
3.42
-
10
34.19
I GVB521
29.33
38.13
1
38.13
z:\dients\ge rgeto"\Ge 21.4\2001-2002 TOWS(Neg).7Q4
Contract No. GEO-00-ED-1 811912003
Units Contracted
June 1, 2001 - May 31, 2002
with EXISTING UNIT PRICES
Not Units (Has their 30% Adder Incl)
Price
Hot Price S
Quantity
Price Total
I GVC1-1
30.19
39.25
6
235.48
I GVC1.11 L
26.64
34.63
7
242.42
I GVC1.13
23.87
31.03
1
31.03
1 GVC1.13L
29.26
38.04
1
38.04
1 GVC2.21
36.65
47.65
1
47.65
1 GVC2.21L
34.00
-
44.20
4
176.80
1 GVC252L
...... _.
54.78
1
54.78
1 GVC5.21
41.36
53.77
3
161.30
I GVC5.31
53.42
69.45
4
277.78
I GVC5.71L
99.23
129.00
2
258.00
1 GVC6.21
139.07
180.79
1
180.79
I GVC7X
19.87
-
25.83
5
129.16
1 GVC9.2
52.81
1
... 52.61
I GVP1.01
15.66
20.36
6
122.15
I GVS1,01
15.55
20.22
9
181.94
N 9110 ACSR
0.45
0.59
2000
1.170.00
N #336 AAC
0.59
0.77
8000
6.136.00
N 94 ACSR
OA3
0.55
15
8.25
NG40
102.53
133.29
5
666.45
N G45
113.55
147.62
55
8.118.83
N G50
119.07
154.79
5
773.96
N GC1
31.08
40.40
1
40.40
N GC1.1
68.06
2
176.12
N GC1-3
93.13
2
186.26
N GC7
..
104.29
4
417.16
N GC7A
235.28
1
235.28
N GC8
400.23
1
400.23
N GE3-2
35.12
1
35.12
N GM5-1
5.37
6.98
22
153.58
N GM5-18 (336)
5.86
7.62
6.
45.71
N GM5.20
7.25
31
275.50
.83.76
N GMS -22
_....
6.98
12.
N GNP -1-A
16.33
2123
4'
84.92
N GVA/.01
_..
8.52
....
... 36!
306.72
N GVA1.011
4.21
5.47
68
372.16
NGVA1-133.14
1
33.14
N GVA1.3
...... _..
28.29
3
64.87
N GVA2.21
67.69
88.00
1
88.00
N GVA4.1
78.D1
6
468.06
N GVA5.1
49.58
8
396.64
N GVA5-1
44.37
57.68
8
461.44
N GVA5-2
47.00
61.10
1
61.10
N GVA5.3
5.58
7.25
10
_ 72.50
N GVA6.1
65.31
84.90
2
_ 169.81
N GVA7X
39.59
51.47
1
51.47
N GVB1.13
26.60
34.58
2
69.16
N GVC1-1
67.74
68.06
4
352.25
M GVC1.13
31,08
40.40
15
606.00
N GVA2.21
88.00
3
264.00
N GVC2.21L
71.64
93.13
13
1.210.72
N GVC2.52L
70.84
9729
1
97.29
N GVC5.21
104.30
5
521.50
z \clienLs\geppeto kGeo-21.412001-2002 Totals (Neg).xts
Contract No. GEO.00-ED-1
Units Contracted
June 1, 2001 -May 31, 2002
with EXISTING UNIT PRICES
811912003
Het Units (Has their 30% Adder Incl)
Price
Hot Price S
Quantity
Price Total
N GVC5.71L
180.99
235.29
1
235.29
N GVC6.21
307.07
40023
12
4,802.77
N GVC6A
262.39
328.11
3
984.32
N GVC9.2
_
88.06
1
88.06
N GVPLOt
27,4
35.67
37
1,319.86
N GVS1.01
27.44
35.67
50
1,783.80
D GUrd. Pd. (1I0 AI 1525)
700.31
910.40
1
910,0
0 GPrlmary DE
15.94
20.72
33
683.83
S Nilo ACSR
7.88
10.24
89.
911.72
-
6#336 AAC
12.73
16.55
63
1.042.59
HO7 UNIT TOTAL
116,920.40
zkAlentsV@cr9et %C,*o-21.412001-2002 To4Js (14e9) *
GUS Board Meeting Date: August 19, 2003
Item No.
GEORGETOWN UTILITY SYSTEM ADVISORY BOARD
AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET
EXECUTIVE SESSION
SUBJECT:
Consideration and possible recommendation related to future generation resource plans for portions of
the City of Georgetown load as provided by the Lower Colorado River Authority (LCRA).
ITEM SUMMARY:
The LCRA is considering expanding their generation resources to add additional generation for
the future in order to meet the growing demands for energy in Central Texas.
As a part of this effort, they are asking the wholesale customers to consider the possibility of 1.)
Capping their existing electrical load within their system or 2.) Continuing the operation ,as we have in the
past. Currently each wholesale customer provides the LCRA detailed information'.wvith regards to
whether or not new generation resources should be added and particularly what size those generation
resources should be.
Staff has prepared information and confidential data that will be shared with the Advisory Board
in order for the Board to make a recommendation to Council as far as which direction to proceed.
The schedule and timing of this information dictates that we will prepare the information for the
Advisory Board for the August meeting, and asking for a GUS Board recommendation to the Council in
September; at which time, Council will eventually make a decision in October or November, 2003
regarding whether or not to cap our load with the LCRA or continue in our current status. Staff will have
the recommendations and further detailed information at the August meeting along with Confidentiality
Agreements as requested by LCRA to prevent the sharing of any of this data outside of the executive
session discussion.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS:
None
FINANCIAL. IMPACT:
None
COMMENTS:
None
ATTACHMENTS:
LCRA Load Cap Information
Submitted By: Jim Briggs, Michael W. Mayben
Assistant City Manager Energy Services Manager
For Utilities
GEORGETOWN
UTILITY'_` s
SYSTEMS
Y.. Ce.w.... 0. U..m
Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation
Notice of Meeting of the
Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation
and the Governing Body of the
City of Georgetown, Texas
Wednesday, September 17, 2003
The Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation will meet on Wednesday, September 17,
2003 at 02:00 PM in the Georgetown Municipal Complex, located at 300 Industrial Avenue, Georgetown,
Texas - San Gabriel Room
If you need accommodations for a disability, please notify the city in advance.
Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation Board Members:
Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation Board regular meetings are held on the third
Wednesday of each month at 2:00 p.m.
Call to Order at 02:00 PM
Board may, at any time, recess the Regular Session to convene an Executive Session at the request of
the President, a Board Member, the Assistant City Manager, City Council Member, or legal counsel for
any purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code Chapter 551, and are
subject to action in the Regular Session that follows
A. Consideration and possible action to approve the minutes of the regular meeting held
August 20, 2003. Paul Brandenburg
B. Discussion and possible action related to the Construction progress report and timelines
(including but not limited to items listed). Joel Weaver
C. Presentation of Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation monthly financial
report for August, 2003. (Micki Rundell)
D. Discussion and possible action to authorize staff to prepare and submit a State Infrastructure
Bank (SIB) loan application to TxDot for the SH 29 and IH 35 projects being constructed in
conjunction with the Wolf Ranch Development. Micki Rundell
Consideration and possible action to set a date for a ribbon cutting ceremony for the Rivery
Boulevard and Rivery Bridge Projects. Jim Briggs
Item regarding TxDOT assigning regional mobility authority - Jim Briggs
Certificate of Posting
I, Sandra Lee, City Secretary for the City of Georgetown, Texas, do hereby certify that this Notice of
Meeting was posted at City Hall, 113 E. 8th Street,a place readily accessible to the general public at all
times, on the day of , 2003, at , and remained so posted for at
least 72 continuous hours preceding the scheduled time of said meeting.
Sandra Lee, City Secretary
Memo
To: GUS Advisory Board
From: Jim Briggs
CC: Paul Brandenburg, Mike Mayben
Date: 09/12/03
Re: New Generation Resource and LCRA Load Cap Issue
I am attaching to this memo a number of documents that have recently gone back and forth between
the LCRA staff and the Association of Wholesale Customers Board of Directors. I attended a marathon
meeting on Thursday September 11, 2003 that focused on the issue of answering questions. These
questions dealt primarily with the new generation resource and how it was to apply to our wholesale
cost of energy. There was a great deal of discussion about the potential exposure that the customers
may have with the asset and how LCRA will manage the dispatch of power from the unit. The
corresponding information will give you a solid background on the communications and should give you
a better feel of what the issues are. I had intended to h ave representatives of LCRA here f or the
meeting but because of schedule conflicts, they w ill not be available. I will a sk the b oard to set a
specific time from our normal meetings to visit with them. You will also note that the year end timeline
originally set for a decision has been moved another 30 days out to allow for more discussion. This
translates into a January timeline for Council action and gives you a little more time to become familiar
with the issues.
0 Page 1