Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes_ZBA_09.21.2021City of Georgetown, Texas Zoning Board of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Tuesday, September 21, 2021 at 5:00 p.m. Courts and Council Building, located at 510 W. 91h Street, Georgetown, TX 78626 Board members present: John Marler, Chair; Stephaney Gipson Lafears, Travis Perthuis, Kaylah McCord and Ed Whitmore Board members in training present: Joseph Digiacomo; Tim Haynie Board members absent: NA Staff Present: Sofia Nelson, Planning Director; Travis Baird, Assistant Planning Director; Ethan Harwell, Senior Planner; Britin Bostick, Historic and Downtown Planner, and Stephanie McNickle, Planning Specialist Chair Marler called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. Public Wishing to Address the Board On a subject that is posted on this agenda: Please fill out a speaker registration form which can be found at the Board meeting. Clearly print your name, the letter of the item on which you wish to speak, and present it to the Staff Liaison, preferably prior to the start of the meeting. You will be called forward to speak when the Board considers that item. On a subject not posted on the agenda: Persons may add an item to a future Board agenda by filing a written request with the Staff Liaison no later than one week prior to the Board meeting. The request must include the speaker's name and the specific topic to be addressed with sufficient information to inform the board and the public. For Board Liaison contact information, please logon to httl2:Hgovernment.georgetown.org/category/boards-commissions/. A. At the time of posting, no persons had signed up to address the Board. Legislative Agenda B. Consideration and possible action to approve the minutes from the August 17, 2021 regular meeting of the Zoning Board of Adjustment - Stephanie McNickle, Planning Specialist Motion by Board member Whitmore to approve the minutes from the August 17, 2021 with updates. Second by Board member McCord. Approved. (4-1) Lafears - opposed. C. Public Hearing and possible action on a Zoning Variance from UDC Sec. 6.05.010.0 to allow a 840 sq. ft. accessory structure, a 46% increase over the maximum allowed size of 574.5 sq. ft., for the property located at 1103 E. 7th Street, bearing the legal description of 0.518 acres, being part of Outlots 6 & 7, Division C (VAR-2021-10). Britin Bostick, Downtown & Historic Planner Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 1 of 2 September 21, 2021 The applicant is requesting approval of a variance from the limit on the size of accessory structures to allow for a 24' x 35' or 840 sq. ft. garage and personal hobby shop to be constructed on the subject property. Based on the size of the existing main structure the maximum size allowed for accessory structure on the property is 574.50 sq. ft. or 25% of the size of the main structure, although garage structures are allowed up to 600 sq. ft. in size. The subject property has a 22,657 sq. ft. lot with a large and open back yard which provides space for the accessory structure without encroaching into setbacks or exceeding impervious cover limits. The applicant asserts that due to the size of the lot and surrounding features, the additional size of the structure would have limited visibility from the street and surrounding properties and would not hinder adjacent uses. Staff stated it has reviewed the submitted Zoning Variance request in accordance with the UDC and other applicable codes. Chair Marler invited the applicant to address the Board. Chad Moore, Moore Liberty Builders gave a presentation and explained the reason for the larger accessory structure on the property. The owner, Fred Erwin stated he likes woodworking and iron work as hobbies and would like a larger work area. Chair Marler opened the Public Hearing. No one came forward. The Public Hearing was closed. Board member McCord stated does she understands and is sympathetic to the applicant's request. Motion by Board member McCord to deny the Variance due to it not complying with the approval criteria, UDC Section 3.15.030. 1) Extraordinary Conditions- Does Not Comply. 2) No Substantial Detriment- Complies. 3) Other Property- Does Not Comply. 4) Applicant's Actions- Does Not Comply. 5) Comprehensive Plan- Partially Complies. 6) Utilization — Does Not Comply. 7) Insufficient Findings- Does Not Comply. Second by Board member Perthuis. Denied (5-0) Motion to adjourn at 5:31p.m. Jhn Marler, Chair Attest, Ed Whitmore, Secretary Planning & Zoning commission Minutes Page 2 of 2 September 21, 2021