Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes_P&Z_06.07.2022City of Georgetown, Texas Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes Tuesday, June 7, 2022 at 6:00 p.m. Courts and Council Building, located at 510 W. 9th Street, Georgetown, TX 78626 Commissioners Present: Travis Perthuis, Chair; Steve Dickey; Chris Stanley; Doug Noble; Tim Haynie Alternate Commissioners Present in the Audience: Alternate Scott Allen; Alternate Colin McGahey, Alternate Michael Price Alternate Michael Price left the meeting at 6:26 p.m. Commissioners Absent: Chere' Heintzmann; Mike Tiland; Alternate Jim Salyer Staff Present: Travis Baird, Assistant Director - Current Planning; Nathaniel Waggoner, Assistant Director - Long Range Planning; Lua Saluone, Utility Engineering; David Munk, Utility Engineer; Wesley Wright, Systems Engineering Director; Chance Sparks, Planning Department Consultant; Sabrina Poldrack, Special Purpose Districts; Nick Woolery, Assistant City Manager; and Kimberly Spencer, Development Administration Program Manager Chair Perthuis called the meeting to order at 6:00 pm with the reciting of the pledge of allegiance. Public Wishing to Address the Board On a subject that is posted on this agenda: Please fill out a speaker registration form which can be found at the Board meeting. Clearly print your name, the letter of the item on which you wish to speak, and present it to the Staff Liaison, preferably prior to the start of the meeting. You will be called forward to speak when the Board considers that item. On a subject not posted on the agenda: Persons may add an item to a future Board agenda by filing a written request with the Staff Liaison no later than one week prior to the Board meeting. The request must include the speaker's name and the specific topic to be addressed with sufficient information to inform the board and the public. For Board Liaison contact information, please logon to http://government.georgetown.org/category/boards-commissions/. A At the time of posting, no persons had signed up to address the Board, however, a member of the public did request for Item C to be pulled from the Consent Agenda to the Legislative Agenda for further discussion. Additionally, staff requested to pull Item AJ from the Consent Agenda to the Legislative Agenda for further discussion as well. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 1 of 16 June 7, 2022 Commissioner Stanley recused himself from consent agenda item AA therefore withdrawing himself from the motion and vote for the Consent Agenda. Consent Agenda The Statutory Consent Agenda includes non -controversial and routine items that may be acted upon with one single vote. An item may be pulled from the Consent Agenda in order that it be discussed and acted upon individually as part of the Regular Agenda. B Consideration and possible action to approve the minutes from the May 17, 2022 regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission -- Kimberly Spencer, Development Administration Program Manager C Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an application for a Preliminary Plat, consisting of approximately 293.6 acres in the William Roberts Survey, Abstract No. 524, generally located on the North and south sides of Shell Road between Sycamore St. and Shell Spur to be known as Woodfield Preserve (2021-28-PP) -- Grant White, Planner Travis Baird recited the caption for Item C. Baird shared that it has been set for disapproval and staff comments have not changed. Applicant Walter Hoysa approached podium. Chris Blackburn yielded to Mr. Hoysa thus giving him 6 minutes to speak. Hoysa spoke primarily to staffs comment regarding alignment of the roadway and the waterline in relation to the roadway. Hoysa shared that in his assessment the waterlines not being constructed under a roadway is a preference not an engineering guideline or requirement. Commissioner Stanley requested a response from City staff. Wesley Wright approached and shared that the raw water line transports water from Lake Stillhouse to Georgetown and allows us in Round Rock and Brushy Creek to treat that water and provide it to customers. The existing development to the Southwest here Georgetown Village has held the right of way line all the way through their development so that this water line could stay in the right of way and not impede the future expansion of Shell Rd. Wright continued to share that as presented by the applicant, if the right of way dedication they are proposing to give is allowed to move forward that water line will meander under the road under a future median. If there is a median there, it makes it extremely difficult to maintain the 48-inch water line. Wesley clarified that if there is any kind of damage to that waterline it will not only shut down that lifeline for Georgetown, Round Rock and Brushy Creek, it will also shut down the road. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 16 June 7, 2022 Keeping the waterline on one side of the road out of the pavement is critical to our ability to maintain both vehicular traffic and water to the lake. Because of this, the proper positioning of this waterline is imperative. Commissioner Haynie requested directional clarity on the waterline. Wright shared that the developer is looking to place the waterline in Phase 4. City staff would like the waterline to be in Phase 6. Wright continued to share that although the waterline is managed by Brazos River Authority, there is county right of way. As this area develops, the intent long term is that it will be annexed into the city. Chair Perthuis confirmed if this was an issue that is unique to Shell Road. Wright shared that, yes, it is an exclusive problem here for Shell Road. The line continues all the way up to the Belton area, and there have been conflicts with road projects, most recently at Reagan and 35.. With the new construction of the overpass, the waterline there had to be relocated as part of that project. Commissioner Haynie asked the applicant if moving the waterline will have an impact on project homes. Hoysa shared that it would significantly impact the number of homes they are able to construct. Chair Perthuis requested confirmation on whether Shell Road is currently in the Overall Transportation Plan or not. Wright confirmed that yes, it is. No further discussion. Motion by Commissioner Stanley to disapprove Item C for the reasons set forth. Second by Commissioner Haynie. The motion was approved unanimously 5 - 0. D Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an application for a Preliminary Plat, consisting of approximately 182.0 acres in the I. Donagan Survey, Abstract No. 178, generally located at 4501 Highway 29 to be known as Crescent Bluff West (2021-29-PP) - Colleen Russell, Principal Planner E Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Preliminary Plat, consisting of approximately 53.68 acres in the Thompson, J. Survey Abstract 608, generally located South of Jay Wolf Drive and Blue Blaze Trail to be known as Wolf Ranch West, Section 3G (2022-3-PP) - Grant White, Planner F Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an application for a Preliminary Plat, consisting of approximately 68.877 acres in the Isaac Donagan survey, Abstract No. 178, generally located at Wolf Ranch --South of SH 29 West SW Bypass to be known as Wolf Ranch Phase 8 (2022-6-PP) - Ryan Clark, Planner Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 16 June 7, 2022 G Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an application for a Preliminary Final Plat Combo, consisting of approximately 70.082 acres in Lewis P. Dyches Survey, Abstract No. 180, generally located at the Southwest Corner of Blue Springs Blvd. and SE Inner Loop to be known as Longhorn Junction Logistics Center (2021-18- PFP) - Patrick Collins, Senior Planner H Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an application for a Preliminary Final Plat Combo, consisting of approximately 19.02 acres in the Barney C. Low Survey, Abstract No. 385, generally located at 5401 N Mays St to be known as Summit at Westinghouse Zone 2A (2022-1-PFP) -- Grant White, Planner I Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Preliminary Final Plat Combo, consisting of approximately 35.0 acres in the David Wright Survey Abstract No. 13, generally located at 5001 AIRPORT RD to be known as G.I.S.D FUTURE READY LEARNING COMPLEX (2022-3-PFP) - Colleen Russell, Principal Planner J Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an application for a Preliminary Final Plat Combo, consisting of approximately 6.507 acres in the Joseph P. Pulsifer Survey, Abstract No. 498, generally located at Southeast corner of Bella June Dr/Sunset Vista Dr to be known as Wolf Lakes Village, Section 7 (2022-6-PFP) -- Patrick Collins, Senior Planner K Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an application for a Preliminary Final Plat Combo, consisting of approximately 0.8917 acres out of Outlot Division A, BLOCK 6(PT), , generally located at 1801 CANDEE ST to be known as Candee Subdivision (2022-7-PFP) -- Grant White, Planner L Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item application for Construction Plans, consisting of approximately 56.47 acres in the Isaac Donagan Survey, Abs No. 178, generally located at 3301 W SH 29 to be known as Heights of San Gabriel (Phase 1) (2021-31-CON) - David Munk, PE, and Lua Saluone, Utility Engineering M Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item application for Construction Plans, consisting of approximately 54.47 acres in the I Donagan Survey, Abs No. AW0178, generally located at 3313 W SH 29 to be known as Riverstone Phases A & B (2022-3-CON) - David Munk, PE, and Lua Saluone, Utility Engineering N Consideration and possible action to approve application for Construction Plans, consisting of approximately 34.41 acres in the Thompson J. Survey Abstract 608, generally located at Blue Blaze Trl and Wandering Path to be known as Wolf Ranch West Section 4G (2022-5-CON) - David Munk, PE, and Lua Saluone, Utility Engineering O Consideration and possible action to approve application for Construction Plans, consisting of approximately 16.7 acres in the Chas H. Delaney Survey, A-181, generally located Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 16 June 7, 2022 at 10128 Ronald Reagan Blvd to be known as Parmer Ranch Phases 5B and 8 (2022-8-CON) - David Munk, PE, and Lua Saluone, Utility Engineering P Consideration and possible action to approve application for Construction Plans, consisting of approximately 36.787 acres in the Addison, Wm. Sur., generally located at 2831 Rockride Ln to be known as Patterson Ranch Phase 1 Phase 1 Revision 2 and 3 (2022-15-CON) - David Munk, PE, and Lua Saluone, Utility Engineering Q Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an application for a Final Plat, consisting of approximately 34.64 acres in the Joseph Thompson Survey, Abstract No. 608, generally located at 1333 W University Ave to be known as First Baptist Georgetown (2021-16-FP) - Travis Baird, Assistant Planning Director R Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Final Plat, consisting of approximately acres, 8.107 acres Tract of land, located in the Antonio Flores Survey, Abstract Survey No. 235, patented in conflict with the O. Perry Survey, Abstract 10, Williamson County, Texas, situated in the City of Georgetown; and being a portion of a called 29.476 acre tract of land described as Tract 1, in document No. 2015085305, of the Official Public Records of Williamson County, Texas, all of a called 0.34 acre tract of land described as Tract 1 and Tract 2, in document No. 2017110177, of the Official Public Records of Williamson County Texas, and all of a called 0.57 acre Tract land as described in Document No. 2017113893, of the Official Public Records of Williamson County. Generally located at N Austin Ave & NE Inner Loop to be known as [Inner Loop Addition Phase 2] (2021-28-FP) - Colleen Russell, Principal Planner S Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Final Plat, consisting of approximately 55.129 acres in the J. Robertson Survey, Abstract No. 545; W. Addison Survey, Abstract No. 21, generally located at 3001 Westinghouse Rd. to be known as Bridgehaven Phase 4 (2021-42-FP) - Colleen Russell, Principal Planner T Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an application for a Replat, consisting of approximately 5 acres in the Fredrick Foy Survey, Abstract No. 229, generally located at 1101 Wildwood Xing to be known as Lot 4, Block Two, Whisper Wood I (2021-51-FP) - Ryan Clark, Planner U Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Final Plat, consisting of approximately 14.816 acres in the 14.816 acres out of John Hamilton Survey, Abstract No. 282, generally located at 200 Pecan Branch to be known as Pecan Branch Subdivision (2021-55-FP) -- Travis Baird, Assistant Planning Director V Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an application for a Final Plat, consisting of approximately 2.5223 acres in the Woodruff Stubblefield Survey, Abstract No. 556, generally located at 140 CR 106 to be known as Hacienda de Guapos (2021-67-FP) -- Grant White, Planner Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 16 June7, 2022 W Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Final Plat, consisting of approximately 15.418 acres in the Isaac Donagan Survey, Abstract No. 178, generally located at 1201 Wolf Canyon Rd to be known as Wolf Ranch Section 8, Multifamily (2021-78-FP) - Grant White, Planner X Consideration and possible action to approve with the conditions set forth in the item an application for a Final Plat consisting of approximately 36.02 acres in the Charles H. Delaney Survey Abstract No. 181, generally located northeast of Ronald Reagan Blvd. and RM 2338 to be known as Final Plat of Parmer Ranch Phase 11 (2022-1-FP) -- Grant White, Planner Y Consideration and possible action to approve with the conditions set forth in the item an application for a Final Plat, consisting of approximately 35.03 acres in the Charles H. Delaney Survey, Abstract No. 181, generally located at 10128 Ronald Reagan Blvd to be known as Parmer Ranch Middle School Final Plat (2022-2-FP) - Ryan Clark, Planner Z Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an application for a Final Plat, consisting of approximately 49.08 acres in the Burrell Eaves Survey Abstract No. 216, City of Georgetown, Williamson County, generally located near 2451 State Highway 195 to be known as Berry Creek Highlands Phase 4C (2022-5-FP) - Colleen Russell, Principal Planner AA Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item application for a Stormwater Permit, consisting of 9.998 acres in the William Robert Sur, Abs No 524, generally located at 3851 Shell Rd to be known as Shell Road Business Park (2021-2-SWP) - David Munk, PE, and Lua Saluone, Utility Engineering AB Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item application for a Stormwater Permit, consisting of 8.15 acres in the W. Stubblefield Survey Abstract 55G, generally located at 111 Ronald Rd to be known as Stout RV Park Phase 2 (2021-7- SWP) - David Munk, PE, and Lua Saluone, Utility Engineering AC Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item application for a Stormwater Permit, consisting of 9.47 acres in the East View Ranchettes Sec One, generally located at 4301 E University Ave to be known as Nueces Power (2022-6-SWP) - David Munk, PE, and Lua Saluone, Utility Engineering AD Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item application for a Stormwater Permit, consisting of Lot 2 of the Richey Subdivision, generally located at 103 CR 103 to be known as 103 County Road 103 Office/ Warehouse (2022-8-SWP) - David Munk, PE, and Lua Saluone, Utility Engineering AE Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an application for a minor revision to a Site Development Plan, consisting of approximately 5.19 Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 16 June 7, 2022 acres in the Hewlett Subdivision Section 2, generally located at 7951 Hewlett Loop to be known as Don Hewlett Volkswagen (2019-21-SDP) - Travis Baird, Assistant Planning Director AF Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Site Development Plan, consisting of approximately 2.99 acres in the Lot 1 and 2, Block 1, Wildwood at Williams Subdivision, generally located at 4601 Williams Drive to be known as 7-11 Wildwood (2020-29- SDP) -- Grant White, Planner AG Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an application for a Site Development Plan, consisting of approximately 43.42 acres in the L.J. Dyches Survey, Abstract No. 180, generally located at 600 SE Inner Loop to be known as Blue Springs Business Park, LLC (2021-58-SDP) -- Grant White, Planner AH Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an application for a Site Development Plan, consisting of approximately 0.6612 acres in the S4209 - North Georgetown Addition, BLOCK 12, Lot 1-2, 7-8, generally located at 806 E. Spring Street to be known as San Gabriel Flats (2021-86-SDP) - Ryan Clark, Planner AI Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Site Development Plan, consisting of approximately 14.843 acres in the L.P. Dyches Survey, Abstract No. 171, generally located at 29600 Ronald Reagan Blvd to be known as Highland Village Multifamily (2021-87-SDP) - Grant White, Planner AJ Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an application for a Site Development Plan, consisting of approximately 61.72 acres in the Williams Roberts Survey, Abstract No. 524, generally located at 4811 N IH-35 to be known as Jackson Shaw - Phase 1 (2021-79-SDP) -- Patrick Collins, Senior Planner Travis Baird presented staff report. At the time the agenda was posted there were several items missing. Since the agenda has been posted all staff comments have been satisfied. Staff is requesting to move item from disapproval to approval. Chair Perthuis opened the Public Hearing and closed it with no speakers coming forth. Motion by Commissioner Dickey to approve Item AJ for the reasons set forth. Second by Commissioner Stanley. The motion was approved 5 - 0. AK Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an application for a Site Development Plan, consisting of approximately 0.42 acres in Lot 2, Block 1, Jim Hogg Addition, generally located at 5606 Williams Drive to be known as Take 5 Georgetown (2022-1-SDP) - Ryan Clark, Planner AL Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Site Development Plan, consisting of approximately 12.043 acres being Lot 2, Block A, Wolf Lakes Village, Section Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 7 of 16 June 7, 2022 2, generally located at FM 265 and Wolf Ranch Parkway to be known as Seton Wolf Lakes (2022- 2-SDP) - Ryan Clark, Planner AM Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an application for a Site Development Plan, consisting of approximately 5.888 acres in the Stubblefield, W. Survey, Abstract No. 556, generally located at 2005 Patriot Way to be known as Lawhon Lift Station and Forcemain (2022-6-SDP) - Ryan Clark, Planner AN Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an application for a Preliminary Final Plat Combo, consisting of approximately 23.62 acres in the Anthony Flores Survey, Abstract 235 and N. Porter Survey, Abstract 497, and William Addison Survey Abstract 21, generally located at 1101 N College St to be known as City of Georgetown Transfer Station - Fuel Farm Reconstruction (2022-10-SDP) - Patrick Collins, Senior Planner AO Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an application for a Site Development Plan, consisting of approximately 19.02 acres in the Barney C Low Survey, Abstract No. 385, generally located at 5201 N Mays St to be known as Summit at Westinghouse Zone 2A (2022-13-SDP) -- Ethan Harwell, Senior Planner AP Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an application for a Site Development Plan, consisting of approximately 14.465 acres in the Lot 2 q Block A of the "DG Westinghouse Addition", generally located at 1300 Westinghouse Road to be known as Freehill Site Development Plan (2022-24-SDP) - Ryan Clark, Planner AQ Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an application for a Site Development Plan, consisting of approximately 14.9 acres in the Windmill Hill, Phase 5, Lot 1, Block C, generally located at 1201 Westinghouse Rd to be known as Westinghouse Business Park (2022-37-SDP) - Patrick Collins, Senior Planner AR Consideration and possible action to approve application for a Traffic Impact Analysis, consisting of approximately 40.086 acres in the Joseph Fish Survey, Abstract No. 232, generally located at SE Corner of CR 105 and CR 110 to be known as Avery Bost Traffic Impact Analysis (2021-10-TIA) - David Munk, PE, and Lua Saluone, Utility Engineering AS Consideration and possible action to approve application for a Traffic Impact Analysis, consisting of approximately 49.31 acres in the John Berry Survey, Abstract No. 51, generally located at 2800 N IH 35 to be known as Berry Creek (2022-1-TIA) - David Munk, PE, and Lua Saluone, Utility Engineering AT Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item application for a Traffic Impact Analysis, consisting of approximately 12.667 acres in the McCoy School Sub, Lot 1, generally located at 1313 Williams Dr to be known as Rivery Boulevard Mixed Use (2022-2-TIA) - David Munk, PE, and Lua Saluone, Utility Engineering Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 8 of 16 June 7, 2022 AU Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item application for a Traffic Impact Analysis, consisting of approximately 19.353 acres in the Joseph Robertson Sur. Abs No. 545, generally located at 2931 FM 1460 to be known as The Oasis at Georgetown (2022-5-TIA) - David Munk, PE, and Lua Saluone, Utility Engineering Motion by Commissioner Dickey to approve the Consent Agenda minus items C, AJ. Second by Commissioner Noble. The motion was approved unanimously 4-0 (Commissioner Stanley recused himself from voting due to a conflict of interest). Legislative Regular Agenda AV Public Hearing and Possible Action on a request for a zoning Map Amendment to zone, upon annexation, a 18.522-acre tract out of the Joseph Fish Survey Abstract No. 332 to Public Facility (PF) zoning district for the property generally located 270 feet north of Crocket Garden Road and 430 feet west of Cedar Breaks Road (2022-5-ANX). Cesar Acosta, Long Range Planner Nat Waggoner presented staff report. The City of Georgetown has requested an initial zoning of Public Facility for the subject property in order to construct a water treatment plant to provide additional water treatment capacity to the west side of the City. The subject property is located 2.6 miles west of Williams Drive and less than half a mile south of Lake Georgetown. The subject property has no manmade structures on the premises. The property is covered in a mix of brush and small trees that are thickest at the northern boundary of the property. There is one dirt road connecting the center of the subject property to Crockett Gardens Rd. The subject property has a Future Land Use designation of Mixed Density Neighborhood and does not have a current zoning district as it is in the City's ETJ. The applicant is requesting that the subject property be brought into the city limits with an initial zoning of Public Facilities (PF) in order to build a water treatment plant. The Public Facilities (PF) zoning district is intended to provide a location for government and other public or quasi -public facility operations. These may include schools, public parks, hospitals, airports, government offices, churches and light industrial uses that allow for the operation of major utilities but would not include industrial facilities or storage yards. Some uses allowed in this district might generate heavy traffic volumes and high -intensity operations. The PF district shall contain uses that are allowed in both residential and non-residential districts and is subject to non-residential design and landscaping standards for compatibility with nearby or adjacent residential uses. Permitted uses in this district include, but are not limited to, emergency services station, government/post office, library, hospital, and utilities. Other uses such as schools, community centers, churches, restaurants, and event facilities are permitted subject to specific design limitations to ensure compatibility with the surrounding properties. Certain land uses including group homes with more than 16 residents, orphanage, psychiatric hospital, and Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 9 of 16 June 7, 2022 major event entertainment, may be permitted subject to approval of a Special Use Permit (SUP). Exhibit 4 contains a comprehensive list of PF district permitted uses and development standards. The proposed rezoning request was reviewed by all applicable City Departments to determine the appropriateness of the requested zoning on the subject property. No comments were issued regarding the zoning request. Staff has reviewed the proposed rezoning request and has found that it complies with 3 of the 5 and partially complies with 2 of the 5 criteria established in UDC Section 3.06.030 for a Zoning Map Amendment. Chair Perthuis opened the floor to commissioners for discussion. Chair Perthuis asked clarification on if we have a future land use areas that are identified for public facility. Waggoner shared that he did not have the background on that. Chair Perthuis did not wish to gain further clarification. Chair Perthuis opened the Public Hearing and closed it with no speakers coming forth. Motion by Commissioner Noble to approve Item AV for the reasons set forth. Second by Commissioner Haynie. The motion was approved unanimously 5 — 0. AW Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Zoning Map Amendment to rezone approximately 486.3 acres out of the Burrell Eaves Survey abstract 216 and Lemuel Walters Survey Abstract 653 from the Residential Single Family (RS), Low Density Multi -family 1 (MF-1), and Local Commercial (C1) zoning district to a Planned Unit Development District (PUD) zoning district, for the property generally located at 4565 Hwy 195 (2021-18-PUD) -- Travis Baird, Asst. Planning Director Travis Baird introduced Chance Sparks from Freese & Nichols as a representative for the City of Georgetown. Sparks presented on the staff report. The subject property is located along portions of Ronald Reagan Blvd. and SH-195 near the intersection of those two arterials. The applicant wishes to develop the property primarily as single-family residential, with a mix of commercial, office and high -density residential uses near the entrances at SH-195 and Ronald Reagan Blvd. The intent is to provide an expansion of the adjoining Sun City Texas as well as other adjacent neighborhoods and commercial services, along with recreational amenities. The proposed PUD has been designed to address the following development standards: Planning &Zoning Commission Minutes Page 10 of 16 June 7, 2022 1. Multi -family Density: The total number of residential units within areas having a multifamily base zoning shall be limited to 535 total units, in no circumstance exceeding the permitted density of the respective base zoning district (MF-1 or MF-2). 2. Single -Family Active Adult to Broad Market Ratio: The active adult residential is set as a maximum of 500 units, with the broader market product being set at a maximum of 750 units (1,250 residential units, combined). 3. Single -Family Lot Type Diversity: In order to achieve product diversity, a maximum of 40% of the total single family active adult lots are allowed to have lot widths between 43' and 50', not to exceed 200 lots. In addition, at least 25% of the total active adult lots are required to have widths 65' or greater, comprised of at least 125 lots. For the broad market single-family detached product, the minimum lot width shall be 45' with a maximum of 46% of total lots being permitted to have widths less than 50' not to exceed 345 lots. A minimum of 20% of the broad market single-family detached product shall have lot widths of 60' or wider, comprised of at least 150 lots. 4. Adjacency Compatibility: The minimum lot width for lots backing the Shady Oaks Estates neighborhood shall be 70'. In addition, a 25' drainage lot buffer is provided against the neighborhood. 5. Residential Lot Standards: The lot standards are adjusted from RS to allow for the lot widths described above, with active adult lots reduced to 5,000 s.f. from 5,500. Impervious cover is calculated across the entire residential portion to 45%, with individual lots being 65% (offsetting with parks/open space). 6. Residential Design Standards: Design standards for active adult products are waived from the UDC to allow consistency with adjacent Sun City standards. Other single family residential must incorporate 2 of 6 elevation features. 7. Multifamily Flexibility: While portions for high density multifamily do not deviate from the UDC, the MF-1 area north of the Collector near the SH 195 entrance shall either comply with UDC standards at time of entitlement for townhouse/condo sites or be developed as 42' singlefamily lots. 8. Commercial Use. The PUD limits the uses permitted in the C1 district and has prohibited uses that do not take steps to support the gateway vision for community. Additionally, the PUD has established limitations on car related uses such as commercial parking lots and transit -related facilities, and residential facilities like correctional facilities and transient service facilities, in an effort to preserve the frontage for uses that will support the increased population that will be created as a result of the residential development. Likewise, some other uses are prohibited due to land consumption, like cemeteries. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 11 of 16 June 7, 2022 - 9. Amenity Center and Parkland/Open Space: The PUD establishes a 3.6 acre amenity center, specifying a range of acceptable recreational uses. It will incorporate rainwater harvesting as well as a native plant palette from the City's list of low water plants. This plant palette also extends to common area landscaping, along with a prohibition on St. Augustine grasses. Based on the parkland calculation formula, the PUD is required to satisfy 9.38 acres of parkland. 5.5 acres of public parkland/open space and 11.4 acres of public passive parkland (16.9 acres total) are provided, to be built by the developer and owned/maintained by the City. The HOA will provide park maintenance. 17 heritage trees are preserved in the 5.5 acre area. A 2,300' trail in the 11.4 acre park. This 11.4 acre park will be owned by Williamson County and maintained by the HOA. In addition, the PUD will install $250,000 in public improvements within the amenity center, $735,000 in public park improvements within the 5.5 acre park, except for the 10' trails along collectors. Development within MF-1 and MF-2 areas will comply with UDC parkland dedication policies and be calculated at time of site plan. 10. Pedestrian Circulation: A 10' sidewalk is proposed on one side of all unloaded collectors, with 6' sidewalks on the other side. 5' sidewalks are included on all residential streets. A 12, shared use path is included along the SH 195 frontage, to be placed in a public access easement. 11. Vehicular Circulation: Specific roadway sections are included, providing provisions to adjust to meet marketing goals and preserve existing trees. Medians shall be at least 10'. Streetlights shall comply with dark sky practices. 12. Signage: A detailed master sign plan is included. Based on the findings within the approval criteria, the requested zoning districts are found to be appropriate for the subject property and area. The proposed addition of the subject property to the existing PUD allows for a unified development that has prioritized commercial land use along the frontages that are consistent with the highway corridor, provides a range of densities appropriate individually and in aggregate for the Mixed Density Neighborhood Future Land Use designation, and creates a system of housing type variety. Natural corridors are protected and used as assets to buffer & transition uses. In Staff review, the request was found to be in accordance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) and other applicable codes. Staff has determined that the proposed request meets 10 of the 11 and partially meets 1 of the 11 of the criteria established in UDC Section 3.06.030 and 3.06.040 for a Planned Unit Development. Chair Perthuis opened the floor to the commissioner for questions. Developer Representative, Amy Payne approached the podium to present. Payne provided a brief history of the development. Presented to council and had a positive response. They also met with several members of the Shady Oaks neighborhood and adjusted the development in response to collaboration with Shady Oaks residents. Some of what included upgraded fencing and lighting. Additionally, residents requested that the developments connection to Roble Roja not be a direct connection. In response, they revised their land plan to make the connection tie Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 12 of 16 June 7, 2022 into the local streets instead of a collector street. She spoke to revisions agreed upon with Shady Oaks residents which included assurance that "no construction" signs will be posted within the neighborhood so that construction traffic will not deviate into the neighborhood. Payne continued to share that they did a TIA back in November 2021. In response to the TIA they made building turn lane improvements to Ronald Reagan and committed to building traffic signals at 195 and Ronald Reagan. Payne shared that they met and exceeded requirements of the TIA. Commissioner Dickey asked for clarity on if the agreed upon improvements are still in the plan currently. Yes. Applicant spoke to improvements and provided a picture of the proposed fencing that was improved. Commissioner Noble requested more information as to why there not a connection to the Sun City neighborhood. Baird noted that there are no stubs where connections would be contemplated. Chair Perthuis clarified that since Berry Creek is next to the subdivision a bridge would need to be constructed in order for there to be a connection. Lua Saluone confirmed that yes, this would be the case. Saluone continued to share that according to the UDC, the development is required to have three connections to major streets. It doesn't specifically say where or how those roads are to be connected. From an engineering standpoint, staff is looking at the code and how that is specifically being met for the connections. Steve Ashlock Pulte Homes approached the podium to provide clarity on the lightly shaded area Commissioner Haynie requested clarity on. That area is referred to as 88 and 89 and is currently being designed. He noted that there is a preliminary plat for Sun City with connections already established for that area thus allowing a better opportunity for an amenity center for that area. Ashlock also shared that those two sections will connect internally with a golf cart path. Chair Perthuis opened the Public Hearing. Phil Restivo approached the podium with 6 minutes to speak (Darla Restivo yielded their time to Phil Restivo). • Restivo summarized presentation. • Highlighted areas of concern: safety, equity of the ingress egress routes, fencing and security. • Shared concern that they do not have the most recent PUD information. • Discussed the character of the neighborhood and how that will be disrupted with the PUD as currently written. • Since Shady Oaks does not have sidewalks and walking trails, streets are often used as walking paths thus making the traffic a higher area of concern. • Residents understand Georgetown is growing, but also wishes that responsible growth is considered. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 13 of 16 June 7, 2022 • Noted that residents of Shady Oaks feel that developers have not offered any suitable remedies to address resident concerns. Michael Spano (Vice President of the Shady Oaks Estates HOA Board) approached the podium with 6 minutes to speak (Ronald Warley yielded their time to Michael Spano). • Shared that they have made several requests to the city via the opens record request for updates and did not receive anything. • Discussed SOE proximity to Sun City and Woodside. Speaks to the location of surrounding establishments/quarries and how that will impact traffic. • Notes concern that there is not any planned road connection with Sun City. • Discusses that they were unaware of any future development when they first moved to the area in 2011 and felt as though they were misled by their agent of the developer on that information. • Expressed concern that GPS will route citizen through their neighborhood as a result of this PUD. Rose Chunik approached the podium with 6 minutes to speak (Steve Spevvy yielded their time to Rose Chunik). • Shared that the inequity with the connections creates an inequity with the traffic. • Discussed concern that the 500 active adult units in the Sun City expansion in the PUD has no direct connection to Sun City thus creating unnecessary high volume of traffic through SOE to Sunset Boulevard, Williams Drive and SH 195. • Discussed current road quality of SOE (21-foot substandard chip seal road and has been classified as a major collector from 195 to Buena Vista, a minor collector from one versus 270 Not 709 oak branch and a local road from there to where it terminates. • Roads will not withstand the expected volume of traffic from Woodside. • Discussed the differences in the TIA and the assessment done by the Institute of Transportation Engineers and the Texas A&M Transportation Institute. • The inequity with the connections and traffic decimates SOE mobility. The city and county both approved SOE development with 21-foot roads, without sidewalks, and streetlights. SOE residents have used its roads for walking, cycling, dog walking congregating, and annual picnics. Increased traffic from Woodside will render current pedestrian friendly SOE community to one that will no longer be safe. • Continued to express concern over mobility, health, safety, and enjoyment of the SOE community. • Wrought iron fencing with wood slats is the current design within this PUD. Wood slats is a maintenance and aesthetic concern. The PUD does not include a fence on the shady oaks border of the park. It only stipulates builders are to install fences on lots before building. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 14 of 16 June 7, 2022 Noted that there is not any security fencing or stone walls proposed within the PUD, thus creating a safety concern. Roger Borgelt (representative of SOE Homeowners) approached the podium with 3 minutes to speak. • Discussed how the health, safety and welfare of SOE will be compromised by the proposed PUD. • Discussed traffic concerns. • Noted developers have a responsibility to the 2030 Comprehensive Plan of the City of Georgetown and does not believe this PUD align with the comprehensive plan as it pertains to the standards of road conditions, public health, safety, and welfare. • Discussed how the Williamson County Subdivision Regulations require the developer to improve boundary roads in SOE and noted that there has been no consideration for how the development of this PUD will impact SOE. • Chris Spano approached the podium with 6 minutes to speak (Theresa Warley yielded their time to Chris Spano). • Addressed the Georgetown 2030 Comprehensive Plan and noted 3 policies that pertain to SOE (H.2, H.4, and H.14) • Discussed SOE requests as it pertains to the 3 policies noted above. • Discusses concern around how the bypass approval arrangement between the developer and city staff has the potential to negate any previous agreements with SOE. • Requests enforcement of the UDC that addressed public safety and requests an upgrade to existing connecting roads. Additionally requests equitable traffic mitigation amongst SOE and Sun City and that an independent TIA to gain a deeper understanding of the traffic impact. • Discussed how construction traffic should be prohibited from SOE and that fencing concerns be addressed along with clarity on drainage channels and detention ponds. Dale Durham approached the podium with 6 minutes to speak (Jeff Strang yielded their time to Dale Durham). Discussed the 2010 agreement where the City, County, landowner and the HOA entered into an agreement that was intended to safeguard SOE. Shared the history of the agreement and how it came to be extinguished. Urged City staff to honor that agreement or create a new/similar agreement that would provide protections. Discussed roadway concerns. Martha Thompson approached the podium with 3 minutes to speak. Resident at 4555 State Highway 195. Discussed their home/easement, agricultural property/easements/cattle operation, and their concern with the development next to their property. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 15 of 16 June 7, 2022 John Thompson approached the podium with 3 minutes to speak. • Discussed easement concerns. Michael Axelrod approached the podium with 3 minutes to speak. • Discussed the rate of growth and its impact to SOE. Motion by Commissioner Noble to disapprove Item AW. Second by Commissioner Haynie for discussion purposes. The motion failed 1- 4 (Chair Perthuis, Commissioner Stanley, Commissioner Haynie and Commissioner Dickey in opposition). Motion by Chair Perthuis to approve Item AW for the reasons set forth. Second by Commissioner Stanley. The motion was approved 4-1(Commissioner Nobel in opposition). AX Discussion Items: Updates and Announcements (Sofia Nelson, Planning Director) Travis Baird discussed the Shot Clock waiver process. Shared that we will have a Development Community Meeting on July 5tn. No update from other Board and Commission meetings. No questions or comments from Alternate Members about the actions and matters considered on this agenda. Reminder of the June 21, 2022, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting in Council Chambers located at 510 W 9th St, starting at 6:OOpm. Adjournment Motion to adjourn by Commissioner Stanley to adjourn. Second by Commissioner Haynie. Approved 5-0. Adjourned at 7:57 p.m. Travis Perthuis, Chair Attest, Si#ve Dic ey, Secretary Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 16 of 16 June 7, ZOZZ