Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda CC 04.23.1996Minutes Item T - Consideration of a Concept Plan of a 118.951 acre tract in the John Berry Survey, to be known as Pecan Branch Subdivision, located on County Road 152 and FM971. The Council approved the Concept Plan of Pecan Branch Subdivision as submitted by the applicant and dated April 9, 1996, with the modification that the design of the development will be adjusted to accommodate the anticipated MOKAN right-of-way through this property such that the land on either side of MOKAN right-of-way can be developed independently and such that in the event the MOKAN right-of-way is not required on this property this proposed right-of-way could be developed in an integrated and coordinated manner with the overall development scheme of the subdivision; and conditioned on these modifications being approved by the Georgetown Planning and Zoning Commission. MEMORANDUM Date: April 19, 1996 From: Bill Harris, Chairman Historic Preservation Commission To: City Council Members Subject: Proposal to Improve Parking Near the Square Area of Georgetown The Historic Preservation Commission wishes to thank the City Council for the opportunity to discuss something that the Commission sees as a growing problem. The problem to which I am referring is the lack of an adequate amount of parking near the Square. It is the Commission's hope that the Council will include this issue in its discussion of projects and priorities for the upcoming budget year during its retreat that will occur in May. The Commission also is looking for guidance on how to proceed with the issue. For years, the City and several other groups have been looking at ways of improving the parking situation on the Square. Some programs have been implemented; however none of them remain in effect today. The Commission and business owners on the Square feel that the issue needs to be addressed urgently given the rate of growth that is being experienced city-wide and the increasing number of retail establishments and offices near the Square. In this endeavor, the Commission has received the support of several different groups including the Chamber of Commerce, the Downtown Georgetown Association, the County employees and owners of businesses on the Square. As a preliminary measure, the Commission directed staff to perform an analysis of the parking situation and determine which opportunities are available to improve the situation. Staff found that the spaces on the Square are nearly always occupied during normal business hours and there are several lots nearby that are also nearly always full. Based on these findings the Commission feels that it is necessary to begin looking into providing more parking opportunities for patrons and employees of businesses and government offices in the area. The Commission realizes that any program of this magnitude should be approved by the Council and that perhaps a budget must be adopted and staff time allocated. To that end, please consider this much needed project when evaluating projects for the coming budget year. Thank you for taking the time to review this issue in which the Commission has a great interest. I will be meeting with you during the workshop portion of the April 23, 1996 City Council meeting to discuss it. At that time, I would be happy to address any or your questions, but please feel free to contact me at any time to discuss this issue. 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 Sick Leave Usage by City, 1995 Kerrville Edinburg Georgetown Brenham Mesquite Richardson San Marcos Lewisville N Average number of sick leave hours per employee CL Avg. Hours Kerrville 24 - 28 Mesquite 48 Edinburg 31.3 Richardson 50.5 Georgetown 33.7 San Marcos 56.2 Brenham 41.2 Lewisville 71.9 The City Of Georgetown Development Process Redesign Feedback on the Current Development Process and/or the Development Process Redesign Please use this page to provide us with your comments about the City's current develop- ment project review and approval process. Please tell us what is effective and what is not effective within the current process. Also, tell us how we can change the process to make it more effective for you. And we'd like to have you thoughts on the Development Process Redesign project too. Thank you for your cooperation and assistance. Please tell us who you are so we can contact you if we need more information or if we have specific recommendations for the redesign on which we would like to get your comments. Name Date Company Phone # Please return to Development Process Redesign Development Services Div., P.O. Box 409, Georgetown, TX 78627 Eeoraetnwn DATE: April 23, 1996 Community Services Memorandum TO: Mayor and Council Members copy to: Bob Hart, City Manager OM: Hartley Sappington S JECT: Appointment to CVB Board to fill Restaurant/Motel Industry vacancy The CVB Board Chair, Gordon Baker, contacted local restaurant owners and/ or managers regarding this vacancy and their interest in serving of the CVB Board. Two persons indicated a desire to serve in this capacity and have submitted information in order to be considered by the Mayor and Council for recommendation and approval. The applicants are: Ruben Rose, Jr., Owner and Operator Wild Rose Cafe- Georgetown Rustin Winkstern, General Manager Monument Cafe- Georgetown. Additionally, an applicant from an earlier applicant pool could be considered an eligible applicant for this opening. This person is: Kathie Frye, Manager/Hostess Harper-Chessher Historic Inn. Please complete and return this application by Friday, January 5, 1996. Application for Boards & Commissions (Please attach a cover letter or r6sum6 which explains your background --and interests.) Name: A. - Address: City & ZI P:a,�/' Home Phone: Work Phone: Do you live inside the Yes z/ Georgetown City Limits? No Please rank up to your first three choices for Boards and/or Commissions to serve on. Airport Advisory Board Building Standards Commission Board of Adjustment Board of Electrical Examiners Convention & Visitors Board Georgetown Hospital Authority Georgetown Housing Authority Historic Preservation Commission Library Advisory Board Parks & Recreation Board Planning & Zoning Commission Wan. ounty & 94ies Health Dist. Signatur Date: Please return to: Mayor and City Council P. O. Box 409 Georgetown, TX 78627-0409 (� a'�/G�� 1// �� S'/sue,,✓ ��. U�p� , APR-23-96 TUE 9:59 LYDA INVESTMENTS FAX NO, 5129304025 P. 01 Rustin Wfii6tt .,jm 4106 Avenue G Austin, Texas 78751 Horne - 323-5941 Office - 930-9586 Born: Batavia, Now York November 24, 1959 Maficd: Wife - l.ael Children : Kendall - 4 years old Sadie - 2 years old Anna - 2 months old Work History: U. S. GyPsuna Company, Chicago, II. 1979 - 1984 P10chAsing Agent 1'o:r CanStructim Dixision Aunt Cbdada's Restaurant, Austin, Tee 1994 -1985 Owner/Operator Spfingllill Catfish Res~taura nl Pflugerville, Texas 1985 1987 Co -Owner Capitol Cafe, Austin, Texas 1987 - 1991 Owner/Operator The Te moe, Austin, Texas 1991 - 1994 General Manager of Catering Pacihty and Concert Venue MQrr�1111ellt Cafe;, Geazg;etown, Texas 1995 - Prescxat General Manager Application for Boards and Commissions City of Georgetown P.O. Box 409 Georgetown, TX 78627- 0409 Name /r 11-a-1h i�3 Home Phone Work Phone io!S % IP/ G,/f3 /�irl�'TAJL 4a`/) r1FV Address Do you live inside Georgetown City limits? e-Yes ❑ No (Some boards have residency requirements) Board or Commission for which you are applying: ❑ Airport Advisory Board ❑ Hospital Authority ❑ Board of Adjustment ❑ Housing Authority ❑ Building Standards Commission ❑ Library Advisory Board Ok-G-nnvention r d /isiro tgTureau(b2) Parks and Recreation Board ❑ Electric Examiner's Board ❑ Planning and Zoning Commission ❑ Historic Preservation Commission ❑ Williamson County and Cities Health District Signature I Date Please attach a cover letter or resume which tells the Mayor and City Council about your background, interest, and experiences. PATRICIA KATHLEEN FRYE 1309 SOUTH COLLEGE GEORGETOWN, TEXAS 78626 (512) 863-4057 WORK EXPERIENCE 1995 to present. Harper-Chessher Historic Inn, Georgetown, Texas. Manager/Hostess. Responsible for orchestrating business meetings, weddings and special parties, maintaining accounts receivable and accounts payable, networking with area businesses, operating the Inn's gift shop, greeting guests, providing tourist information relating to the City of Georgetown, complete charge of domestic and business responsibilities. 1990 to 1995. Orient Square Restaurant, Georgetown, Texas. Hostess/Waitress. Greet and seat customers, wait tables, take telephone orders, assist manager with office duties including bookkeeping, ordering supplies and making bank deposits. 1989 to 1994. Private Tutor, Georgetown, Texas. Kindergarten through fourth grade. 1976 to 1988. Safeway Stores, Inc., Houston, Texas and Round Rock, Texas. Grocery Checker/Courtesy Booth Operator/General Merchandise Manager. Grocery Checker duties include checking on five types of cash registers and scanners. Courtesy Booth Operator duties include cash checks and make money orders, coordinate employees' breaks, balance cash registers, handle returns and make sales reports. Proficient with 10 key. General Merchandise Manager duties include ordering and stocking health and beauty aides, automotive, houseware, candy, spices and seasonal displays. Position requires use of MSI Ordering Machine. Attend purchase shows to find new stock for Safeway. EDUCATION 1986 (Graduation). Austin Community College. Associate of Arts in General Studies. -1976 to 1979. University of Houston. Majored in Elementary Education. VOLUNTEER WORK Worked with SCORE (Safeway Community Outreach Effort), collected donations for Leukemia Society and typed homework for blind students on Braille typewriter. HOBBIES Swimming, golfing, roller blading, ice skating, water skiing, reading, crocheting, gardening, miscellaneous crafts and chocolate connoisseur. Currently learning Spanish as a second language. NOTICE OF MEETING OF THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS TUESDAY, April 23, 1996 The City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, will meet on Tuesday, April 23, 1996, at 5:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, located at the northeast corner of Seventh and Main Street in Georgetown, Texas. If you need accommodations for any type of disability, please advise in advance. Detailed explanatory information on the items listed below is compiled in an agenda packet which is distributed to the Mayor and each member of the Council. An agenda packet is also available at the Public Library, for the use of interested citizens. Governance Workshop - Call to order at 5:00 p.m. A Redesign Team Report/Bob Stevenson and Hildy Kingma B Employee Sick Leave Analysis Report/Southwestern University Intern Skye Stuart C Discussion with representatives of the Historic Preservation Commission regarding downtown parking alternatives D CAPCO Meeting Report/George Arroyos E Name the 971 Facility F Answer questions on Consent Agenda Items listed specifically below under the Regular Session that will begin no sooner than 7:00 p.m. (for questions only, no action to be taken until Regular Session) Regular Session - to convene Executive Session Executive Session In compliance with the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, Government Code, Vernon's Texas Codes, Annotated, the items listed below will be discussed in closed session and are subject to action in the regular session that follows. G Sec.551.071 consultation with attorney H Sec.551.072 deliberation on real property Sec.551.075 conference with employee Regular Session to begin no earlier than 7:00 p.m. J Action on Executive Session Items K Mayor, Council, City Manager, and staff comments and reports City Council Agenda/April 23, 1996 Page 1 of 4 Pages • Reminder of Special Council Meeting on 5:15 p.m. on Tuesday, May 7, 1996, (prior to the Planning and Zoning Meeting at 6:00 p.m.) to canvass the results of the May 4, 1996 General/Special Election, swear in new councilmembers, and elect Mayor Pro Tem • Tourism Proclamation • Public Service Recognition Week Proclamation L Citizens wishing to address the Council Public Heariniz M Public Hearing regarding the annexation of approximately 81.181 acres in the David Wright Survey, located between Airport Road and IH357 north of Lakeway Drive/Clyde von Rosenberg and Ed Barry Consent A enda Consent agenda includes non -controversial and routine items that council may act on with one single vote. A councilmember may pull any item from the consent agenda in order that the Council discuss and act upon it individually as part of the regular agenda. Please note that the following items may be discussed with no action taken during the Workshop at 5:00 p.m. N Consideration of approval of meeting minutes --Regular Meeting of April 9,1996/Sandra Lee O Consideration of award of semi-annual bid for poleline hardware to various bidders in the estimated amount of $78, 5 82.3 7/Terry Jones and Jim Briggs P Consideration of a resolution to authorize a License to Encroach into the platted public utility easement located along Reinhardt Boulevard of Churchill Farms, Section Five, Block A. Lot 14, located at 412 Stonehedge Boulevard/Hildy Kingma and Ed Barry Q Consideration of a resolution to authorize a License to Encroach into the public utility easements and drainage easements located along the rear property lines of Lots 8-13, Block M, Stonehedge Subdivision, Section Two, known as 204, 206, 300, 302, 304, and 306 Belmont Drive/Hildy Kingma and Ed Barry R Consideration of a resolution to authorize a License to Encroach into the platted public utility easement located along the west property line of Magnolia Court of Berry Creek, Section Nine, Phase II, Block A, Lot 20, located at 31007 Magnolia Court/Hildy Kingma and Ed Barry S Consideration of a resolution authorizing the City Attorney to issue a quit claim deed to be filed abandoning the platted public utility easements located along the rear and south side lot lines at Parkview Estates, Block D, Lot 21 known as 102 Parque Vista Drive/Hildy Kingma and Ed Barry City Council Agenda./April 23, 1996 Page 2 of 4 Pages T Consideration of a Concept Plan of a 118.951 acre tract in the John Berry Survey, to be known as Pecan Branch Subdivision, located on County Road 152 and FM971/H1ldy Kingma and Ed Barry U Consideration of a Final Plat of a 99.096 acre tract in the R. T. Jenkins, Isaac Jones, Abner Short, W. G. Wilkinson, and George Thompson Surveys, to be known as the Planned Unit Development of Sun City Georgetown, Phase 2, Neighborhood Ten/Hildy Kingma and Ed Barry V Consideration of a Final Plat of a Resubdivision of Logan Ranch, Section One, Lot 43, located at 221 Logan Ranch Road/Hildy Kingma and Ed Barry W Consideration of a Final Plat of a 6.76 acre tract combining multiple tracts in the Cedar Oaks Subdivision, North Georgetown Addition and acreage in the Nicholas Porter survey, to be known as Foster Square, located between Spring Street, Morrow Street, Austin Avenue, North Forest Street, I113 5, and Old Lampasas Road/Hildy Kingma and Ed Barry X Consideration of a Final Plat of River Oaks IH35 Business Park, a Resubdivision of River Oaks of Georgetown Office Park, located on the East IH3 5 Frontage Road, north of SH29/Hildy Kingma ,and Ed Barry Y Consideration of a Revised Final Plat of a 53.537 acre tract in the Daniel Monroe, Lewis M. Russell and Abner Short Surveys, being a Resubdivision of a Planned Unit Development of Sun City Georgetown, Phase 1, Neighborhood One, Tracts H and S, and a Revision of a Planned Unit Development of Sun City Georgetown, Phase 1, Neighborhood Eight, to be known as a Planned Unit Development of Sun City Georgetown, Neighborhood Eight-A/Hildy Kingma and Ed Barry Z Consideration of the development agreement concerning the platting of Foster Square (Albertson's)/Marianne Banks AA Consideration of a resolution declaring April as Fair Housing Month/Hartley Sappington Re ular A_enda Council will individually consider and possibly take action on any or all of the following items: (Council may, at any time, recess the regular session to convene in executive session at the request of the Mayor, a councilmember, or the City Manager.) BB Consideration of a resolution and Statewide Transportation Enhancement Program Application to Texas Department of Transportation for Hike/Bike Trails along the South San Gabriel River, with the City of Georgetown committing 20% of the cost of the program, with 80% of the cost from the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficienty Act of 1991 (ISTEA)/Randy Morrow CC Consideration of a Variance to the access and driveway separation standards of the Subdivision Regulations for Serenada Country Estates, Unit One, Lot 4/Hildy Kingma and Ed Barry DD Consideration of a Variance from the Subdivision Regulations for Churchill Farms, Section Five, Block A, Lot 14, located at 412 Stonehedge Boulevard/Hildy Kingma and Ed Barry City Council Agenda/April 23, 1996 Page 3 of 4 Pages EE Consideration of a Preliminary Plat of a 5.01 acre tract in the David Wright Survey, to be known as Hempe Estates; and Variances to the Subdivision Regulations/Hildy Kinga and Ed Barry FF Consideration of a Preliminary Plat of a resubdivision of Crystal Knoll Terrace, Unit One, Block 11, Lot 74-111dy Kingma and Ed Barry GG Consideration of the recommendation of the Council Compensation Committee regarding monthly remuneration to the Mayor and Councilmembers/Sandra Lee HH Consideration of appointments to the 150th Birthday Committee/Mayor Wood II Consideration of appointment of one member to the Convention and Visitors Bureau Board/Mayor Wood Adjournment CERTIFICATE OF POSTING I, , City Secretary of the City of Georgetown, Texas, do hereby certify that this Notice of Meeting was posted on the day of , 1996) at a.m./p.m. Sandra D. Lee, City Secretary City Council Agenda/April 23, 1996 Page 4 of 4 Pages Council meeting April 23, 1996 Item No. AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET SUBJECT: Public hearing regarding the annexation of approximately 81.181 acres in the David Wright Survey, located between Airport Road and IH35, north of Lakeway Drive. ITEM SUMMARY: This is the first of two (2) public hearings required by State law before initiation of annexation can begin. The purpose of the ptxblic hearings is to describe and receive comments on the City's plans for providing services to the annexation areas. The service plans for the areas to be annexed are attached (see Exhibit A). State law requires that the proposed service plan be explained at the public hearing. While it may be amended as a result of the public hearings, the provision of any service may not be deleted. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: None FINANCIAL IMPACT: Full City services, including police and fire protection, emergency medical services, solid waste collection and disposal, maintenance of water and wastewater facilities, maintenance of road, streets and drainage, street lighting, maintenance of City park and recreation facilities must be provided to the annexed area within sixty (60) days after the effective date of the annexation. Necessary extension of capital improvements, such as water and wastewater systems, must be initiated within two years of annexation and be substantially completed within 4 1/2 years, in accordance with the adopted service plan, except when the annexed area is within the service area of another water or wastewater utility. COMMENTS: A resolution indicating intent to annex the 81.181 acres was approved by the City Council at the April 9, 1996 meeting. ATTACHMENTS: Map and service plan Submitted .L. Edward J. ry, AICP - Director Division of evelopment Services Clyde von Rosenberg, A CP Chief Planner, Long Range Planning CITY OF GEORGETOWN 312 / 204 473.70 At 1 GEORGETOWN &AI IKilt 10 A 1 A 1Mono•r SIapLE � 1 ,E 39 3 MART COCK[ 215 /631 WILL 4 136.22 AC 1 33732 AC APPROXIMATELY 81.181 ACRES IN THE DAVID' WRIGHT SURVEY ExHIBIT A. Page I of 3 h Q. 3 r r _ r L 81 SN Of 17. 14 A. C'!RL GRiGO' 2o61/6'. (11.14 A 10.14 AC, r GEJoGET 21 a CMAp� n 9E4/ .iti 1 G 12G 16A •y P �4k�ES C-RISTEKSER Q 3�7 /470 176 40cc )\\ 74 37Ac � 1 +i EXHIBIT A, Page 2 of 3 CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS ANNEXATION SERVICE PLAN APPROXIMATELY 81.181 ACRES IN THE DAVID WRIGHT SURVEY, LOCATED BETWEEN AIRPORT ROAD AND IH35, NORTH OF LAKEWAY DRIVE Introduction This service plan has been prepared in accordance with Texas Local Government Code ,: Chapter 43 - Municipal Annexation. This requires that the service plan provide for the extension of full municipal services to the area to be annexed by any of the methods by which it extends services to any other area of the municipality. Police Protection Regular and routine patrolling of streets, responses to calls, and other police services will be provided upon the effective date of the annexation. Fire Protection and Code Enforcement Fire protection and prevention services are currently being provided to the area through an agreement with Williamson County. These services will continue to be provided to the area upon the effective date of the annexation. Upon the effective date of the annexation, the City Code Enforcement Officer will periodically patrol streets irl, the area to ensure that all properties are in conformance with City Code. Solid Waste Collection Solid waste collection and disposal services will be provided upon the effective date of the annexation, in accordance with the rates, terms and conditions contained in the City Code. Water Service Water lines will be extended in accordance with City policy. The City has a Utility Expansion and Improvement Policy, which is described in this service plan. Sewer Service Wastewater lines will be extended in accordance with City policy. The City has a Utility Expansion and Improvement Policy, which is described in this service plan. Maintenance of Roads, Streets, and Drainage Roads, streets and drainage facilities dedicated to the public will be maintained according to City Code and policy upon the effective date of the annexation. Street Lighting Street lighting will be made available upon the effective date of the annexation, upon request of the property owners, in accordance with City Code and policy. Annexation Service Plan, Page 1 of 2 EXHIBIT A, Page 3 of 3 Parks and Recreation Parks and recreation facilities dedicated to the public will be maintained according to City Code and policy upon the effective date of the annexation. Recreation services will be provided to all residents in accordance with the rates, terms and conditions contained in the City Code. Planning and Zoning Upon the effective date of the annexation, the planning and zoning jurisdiction of the City will extend to this area. The area will be zoned A (Agricultural), unless otherwise approved through regular procedures. Inspection Services All inspection services, including building, electrical, plumbing, etc., provided by the City will be extended to the area upon the effective date of the annexation. Library Services Library services will be provided to all residents in accordance with the rates, terms, and conditions contained in the City Code upon the effective date of the annexation. Other Services Other services provided by the City, such as animal cpntrol, court, and general administration, will be made available upon the effective date of the annexation, in accordance with the City Code and policies. Utility Expansion and Improvement Policy City Ordinance Number 900404, a Utility Expansion and Improvement Policy, guides the planning, design, construction, operation, and maintenance of all utility system improvements, including water, wastewater and electrical service. Annexation Service Plan, Page 2 of 2 Council meeting date: 4-23-96 Item No. /IV AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET SUBJECT Meeting Minutes of Regular City Council Meeting on Tuesday, April 9, 1996. ATTACHMENTS 1. Minutes of Regular City Council Meeting of Tuesday, April 9, 1996 Sub d By: Sandra D. Lee, City Secretary MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS TUESDAY, April 9, 1996 The City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, met in Regular Session on the above date with Mayor Leo Wood presiding. Council Present: Dick Vincent George Arroyos Lee Bain Susan Hoyt Ferd Tonn Shelley Davis Doris Curl Staff Present: Bob Hart, City Manager Marianne Banks, City Attorney Sandra Lee, City Secretary Susan Morgan, Dir. of Finance and Administration Ed Barry, Dir. of Development Services Council Absent: None Terry Jones, Purchasing Agent Governance Workshop - Call to order at 5:00 p.m. A Employee Sick Leave Analysis Report/Southwestern University Intern Skye Stuart This item was deferred to the Council Workshop on April 23. B Answer questions on Consent Agenda Items listed specifically below under the Regular Session that will begin no sooner than 7.00 p.m. (for questions only, no action to be taken until Regular Session) Regular Session - Called to order at 5:50 p.m. Executive Session In compliance with the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, Government Code, Vernon's Texas Codes, Annotated, the items listed below will be discussed in closed session and are subject to action in the regular session that follows. C Sec.551.071 consultation with attorney D Sec.551.072 deliberation on real property E Sec.551.075 conference with employee Regular Session - Resumed at 7.05 p.m. F Action on Executive Session Items City Council Agenda/April 9, 1996 Page 1 of 7 Pages Executive Session was recessed until after the Regular Session. There was no action taken on Executive Session items at this time. G Mayor, Council, City Manager, and staff comments and reports Hart displayed the Safety Award that had been presented to the Electric Department from the American Public Power Association. Hart told Council that the City was notified today that the Berry Creek Treatment Plant has received the 1996 Environmental Protection Agency Operations and Maintenance Excellence State Award and qualifies for regional competition. The other two plants are also in the competition, but results have not yet been announced. Arroyos gave an update on the most recent meeting of the Facilities and Services Working Group and told Council that a draft of the Century Plan element will be available for public review in early May with a public hearing scheduled on May 20. A formal presentation will be made to Council on May 28, prior to the Budget Retreat. He again encouraged Council to tour City facilities, specifically the Police Department, and commended Councilmember Bain for co-chairing the Facilities and Services Working Group with him. Arroyos reminded council that he is their representative to CAPCO and that the General Assembly Meeting would be held the next day. Arroyos stepped to the podium to explain the Councilmember Companion Program in his District that he developed to help communicate the role of the Council to his constituents and to receive input from them. He introduced and commended Daniel Robles and presented a City of Georgetown lapel pin to him for his participation in the District 1 Program. Curl told Council about the meeting of the Georgetown Project for promoting healthy environment for children in Georgetown. She noted that she had attended and that several City employees were also in attendance. Vincent announced the hiring of a new full-time GIVE Director, Karen Hill. He reported on the upcoming golf tournament to be held on the 19th, and the Crop Walk and recognition of volunteers to be held at Sun City on the 28th. H Citizens wishing to address the Council Wood recognized Mr. Paul Rayls of 1205 Ash Street, who told Council about a decision of the Georgetown Building Standards Commission at their monthly meeting yesterday. He explained that he had gone to the Commission after they had already determined that the property should be demolished within a certain time and they allowed him to purchase the property with restrictions. He admitted that he had not met their established deadlines. He said he has materials and plans together for reconstruction of the property and asked Council to keep his house from being demolished on Monday. City Council Agenda/April 9, 1996 Page 2 of 7 Pages Wood recognized Mr. Jean D. Neal, Jr. of 1237 Main Street who told Council that he was here to support Mr. Rayls. He said Rayls has asked for four to six weeks to do the foundation, saying that Rayls has renovated the back structure, and asked Council to reconsider. Wood asked Banks to explain Mr. Rayls' options. Banks stated that, at this point, the Council has no authority to rescind the order, and that Rayls' recourse would be to take his appeal to the District Court. Wood asked visiting students from Osnabruck University to approach the podium. Four students from northwestern Germany were presented with City of Georgetown lapel pins. Consent Agenda Consent agenda includes non -controversial and routine items that council may act on with one single vote. A councilmember may pull any item from the consent agenda in order that the Council discuss and act upon it individually as part of the regular agenda. Please note that the following items may be discussed with no action taken during the Workshop at 5:00 p.m. I Consideration of approval of meeting minutes --Regular Meeting of March 26,1996/Sandra Lee Arroyos asked that the minutes be amended to show that he had suggested that the Council tour City facilities, especially the Police Station. J Consideration of authorizing the Mayor to execute an agreement for professional grant management services with the Institute for Finance and Economic Development on behalf of Advance Metal Systems, Inc./Bob Hart K Consideration of a resolution authorizing the City Attorney to issue a quit claim deed to be filed abandoning the platted public utility easements located along specified side lot lines in the River Ridge Three Subdivision, Sections A, B, C. and D/Hildy Kingma and Ed Barry It was specifically added to this item that the platted public utility easements could be abandoned except in those areas where the staff identified that the easements should be maintained for the operation of utilities. except in those areas where the staff has identified that the easements should be maintained for the operation of utilities. L Consideration of a resolution authorizing the City Attorney to issue a quit claim deed to be filed abandoning the platted public utility easement (PUE) located along the south lot line of Lot 9, Block C, Turtle Bend, Section One/Hildy Kingma and Ed Barry M Consideration of a resolution authorizing the City Attorney to issue a quit claim deed to be filed abandoning the platted drainage easement located along the rear lot line of Reata Trails, Unit Three, Block D, Lot 24, located at 142 Canyon Road/Hildy Kingma and Ed Barry City Council Agenda/April 9, 1996 Page 3 of 7 Pages N Consideration of approval of a resolution authorizing the Mayor to execute an airport land lease with Don C. Pfiester for the construction of a private aircraft storage hangar/Travis McLain and Hartley Sappington (Doris Curl abstained from voting on this item.) O Consideration of approval of the purchase of an emergency generator from the Houston Galveston Area Council in the amount of $15,844.49\Terry Jones and Susan Morgan P Consideration of approval of the award of bid for the mechanical, electrical, and plumbing of the Reedholm Instruments Building to Dorsey Construction in the amount of $159,000.00/Terry Jones and Hartley Sappington (Dick Vincent abstained from voting on this item.) Q Consideration of approval of award of bid for the construction of the Reedholm Instruments facility to Dorsey Construction in the amount of $603,000.00/Terry Jones and Hartley Sappington (Dick Vincent abstained from voting on this item.) R Consideration of approval of a change order reducing the cost of the Reedholm Instruments Building by $48,200.00/Terry Jones and Hartley Sappington (Dick Vincent abstained from voting on this item.) S Consideration of approval of an award of the annual electric system construction and maintenance contract in the amount of $310,114.04 to Flowers Construction Company of Temple/Jim Briggs T Consideration of appointment of a Council Compensation Committee/Mayor Wood Mayor Wood added Mark Ramos to the recommended members of this Committee. U Consideration of approval of a resolution indicating intent to annex, setting of the public hearings, and adoption of the service plans for the annexation of: approximately 81.181 acres in the David Wright survey, located between Airport Road and IH35, north of Lakeway Drive/Clyde von Rosenberg and Ed Barry Motion by Tonn, second by Bain to approve the Consent Agenda with the correction to the minutes and the added wording to Item K. Approved 7-0. Regular Agenda Council will individually consider and possibly take action on any or all of the following items: (Council may, at any time, recess the regular session to convene in executive session at the request of the Mayor, a councilmember, or the City Manager.) City Council Agenda/April 9, 1996 Page 4 of 7 Pages V Consideration of approval of an ordinance on second reading for rezoning of 6.0 acres in the Antonio Flores Survey, located on Old Airport Road, locally known as Centex Butane, from RS, Residential Single Family to I, Industrial/Hildy Kingma and Ed Barry Curl asked and was told there would be buffer fencing, not to exceed six feet in height. She asked if the butane and propane tanks would be filled at that location, and asked that it be a consideration for future ordinance consideration. Barry read the caption. Motion by Tonn, second by Vincent to approve Ordinance 96-10 on second reading. Approved 7-0. W Consideration of approval of an ordinance on second reading amending Exhibit 1 of the Century Plan - Development Plan for the Georgetown Technology Park, Lot 4, from Intensity Level Three to Intensity Level Four/Clyde von Rosenberg and Ed Barry Barry read the caption. Motion by Bain, second by Arroyos to approve Ordinance 96-11 on second reading. Approved 7-0. X Consideration of approval of an ordinance on second reading amending Exhibit 1 of the Century Plan - Development Plan for the Lost Addition, Block 79, locally known as Georgian Apartments, from Intensity Level Three to Intensity Level Six/Clyde von Rosenberg and Ed Barry Barry read the caption. Motion by Tonn, second by Davis to approve Ordinance 96-12 on second reading. Approved 7-0. Y .Consideration of a detailed development plan of Lost Addition, a portion of Block 70, located at the intersection of University Avenue and Austin Avenue; and variances to the Subdivision Regulations\Hildy Kingma and Ed Barry Wood noted that there were two citizens that had signed up to speak to Council regarding this item. They each preferred to wait and speak after staff had presented the item to Council. Barry told Council that the developers and neighbors had met at the Development Services Building with Planning and Zoning Chair Cal Wilkerson and Barry observing. Barry noted that a number of issues were discussed. One of the concessions agreed to by the developer was that buffering will be done with a 10-foot fence. Barry asked Council to specifically say in their motion that this is above and beyond what the City required. He also told Council that two aspects of the property lighting were discussed --one being that the outside lights would be so directed as to not disturb adjacent properties and the other that the actual location of the light fixtures was to be recessed beneath the canopy at the pump island so as not to be visible. Barry said the developer was also asked to utilize materials such as limestone on north the north side of the building facing University and three feet up on the east side of building facing Austin Ave. Barry noted that the color of the canopy will be red as specified in Exon's design and the roof was to be flat although the neighbors asked for something more in character with the surrounding architecture. Wood thanked Barry and Hart for the teamwork efforts to bring the two sides to a compromise. City Council Agenda/April 9, 1996 Page 5 of 7 Pages Arroyos asked and was told that the entire north wall would be rocked. Wood confirmed that the east side would be rocked at a height of three feet, a ten -foot fence would be installed, and all lighting would be directed to minimize disturbance to adjacent property. Davis asked and was told that the fence would be on both the west and south sides. Vincent inquired as to why a pitched roof could not be incorporated such as done with Wag -a -Bag. Curl asked and was told that the location of the dumpster was not discussed, although it had previously been an issue. Bain asked for the proper procedure for adding the specific stipulations to the motion, and Barry suggested he could prepare something for a Councilmember to read when making the motion. Arroyos and Davis commended the neighbors and the business for working together. Wood recognized Ms. Janie Headrick of 1205 Austin Avenue who thanked everyone, particularly Davis, for the compromises that were possible, and asked that in the future, an ordinance be adopted to ensure quality of life and preservation of the historic nature of Georgetown. Will Moore of 1208 Austin Avenue said he was happy that concessions were given, but that all of the desires had not been met, such as the design of the building and the color of the canopy. He said the developers were placing their level of profits over the quality of life of the citizens. Curl said that at this time of heavy growth issues need to be addressed to speak to quality of life and that should be addressed by the Council. She said she also does not think it's fair for vendors to use vacant parking lots. She thanked the citizens for coming together and working out the compromise. Bain said there were other issues at that intersection that might have been missed if this item had not been discussed. He suggested requesting that the State be asked to re-route truck traffic from that intersection. He also urged that the Council work toward giving clear guidelines in the future for historic preservation. He also thanked the citizens for working out the compromise. Davis suggested that an ordinance be adopted allowing guidelines for a better working relationship for corporations coming to Georgetown, and suggested enlarging the historical district to a mile radius beyond the downtown. Vincent agreed that Council needs to move forward on urban design in the interest of all parts of the City. Barry said there had been a question concerning the maintenance of the fence. He said that was considered to be a part of the expected maintenance of the property, subject to Code Enforcement. Bain asked and was told that the construction of the fence would allow adequate drainage. Curl asked and was told if that a crime prevention fence would be installed at either end of the buffer fence between the it and the property owners. She also asked and was told that the restrooms would City Council Agenda/April 9, 1996 Page 6 of 7 Pages be located inside the building. Bain asked if the neighbors in the audience were in agreement with the proposed motion wording as provided by Barry. There was no disagreement from the neighbors present in the audience. Motion by Tonn, second by Curl to approve subject to: 1.) The applicant constructing a 10 foot tall privacy fence on the south and west property lines behind the building setback lines; and 2.) The applicant will recess all lighting attached to the gas pump island canopy; and 3.) The applicant will work in cooperation with adjacent neighbors to minimize lighting on the site from intruding into surrounding residential properties; and 4.) The applicant will use white limestone rock on the north side of the main building (except for support columns) and on the east side of the main building to a height of 3 feet from ground level. Approved 7-0. Z Consideration of an ordinance on first reading amending Ordinance 96-09 to replace the 80.3 acre tract with a 2.821 acre tract/Marianne Landers Banks This item was deferred to the next Council Meeting. Resumed Executive Session at 8:22 p.m. Regular Session - Resumed at 8:50 p.m. F Action on Executive Session There was no action taken on Executive Session items. Approved: Leo Wood, Mayor City Council Agenda/April 9, 1996 Page 7 of 7 Pages The meeting was adjourned at 8:52 p.m. Attest: Sandra D. Lee, City Secretary Council Meeting Date: April 23, 1996 Item No. 0 AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET SUBJECT Award of semi-annual bid for poleline hardware to various bidders in the estimated amount of $78, 582.37. ITEM SUMMARY Bids were received to provide the City with poleline hardware for a six month period beginning May, 1996. The staff recommendation is to award this bid to the low bidder for each line item, as designated on the attached bid tabulation. For those items where there is a tie, the low bidder will be decided by drawing lots. Bids are taken every six months for poleline hardware at the request of the bidders. Price increases and decreases are passed down from the manufacturers every six months and bidding semi-annually provides a chance for more bidders to bid firm prices for the contract period. Items on this bid are stocked in the City warehouse and are used primarily for maintenance of the electrical distribution system. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS none FINANCIAL IMPACT (cost of item, fund and division name, budgeted amt.) Estimated total for this bid is $78,582.37. $250,000.00 was budgeted for this expenditure in account 611-101-6101-00 Electrical Capital Projects of which this amount is included. COMMENTS (from City Attorney, staff, boards and commissions) none ATTACHMENTS (list individually) 1. Bid Tabulation .1ny Jones, Purchasing Director Briggs, Director of Community Owned Utilities POLELINE HARDWARE BID NO.96019 EST. 6 MO. POWER NO. STOCK # QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION CUMMINS KBS SUPPLY PM&N SWEUS TECHLINE TEMPLE WESCO 1 36-4016 50 EA SPLIT BOLT CONNECTOR, PLATED, ACSR 4-6/4-6 BLACKBURN #2HPS 0.83 0.84 2.35 1.07 NB 0.77 * NB 0.78 2 36-4017 100 EA SPLIT BOLT CONNECTOR, PLATED, 8 SOU#2STR BLACKBURN #1 HPS 0.86 0.93 2.50 0.51 NB 0.81 NB 0.98 3 36-4018 50 EA SPLIT BOLT CONNECTOR, PLATED, ACSR 6-8/6-8 BLACKBURN #4HPS 0.79 1.44 1.68 0.42 * NB 0.70 NB 0.72 4 36-4019 100 EA SPLIT BOLT CONNECTOR, PLATED, ACSR 6 STR TO 2/0 STR, BLACKBURN #20HPS 1.95 4.50 5.22 2.41 NB 1.65 " NB 1.98 5 36-4020 25 EA TWO BOLT CONNECTOR WITH SPACER & PLATED, 2/0-2 TO 2/0-8, BURNDY KVSU26 3.20 " 4.44 8.99 3.38 NB 3.30 4,25 NB 6 36-4021 50 EA TWO BOLT CONNECTOR WITH SPACER & PLATED, 397.5-336.4 TO 397.5-4, BURNDY KVSU34 5.96 16.00 32.51 5.44 NB 6.25 8.65 NB 7 36-4022 10 EA TWO BOLT CONNECTOR WITH SPACER & PLATED, 397.5-900 to 4/0-900, BURNDY KVSU44 13.08 30.50 62.54 10.45 ' NB 15.37 15.65 NB 8 36-4025 500 EA COMPRESSION CONNECTOR, 2-6 TO 2-6 ACSR BLACKBURN #WR159 0.19 0.21 1.10 0.21 NB 0.19 0.23 0.20 9 36-4026 500 EA COMPRESSION CONNECTOR, 1/0 - 3 TO 2-6 ACSR BLACKBURN #WR189 10 36-4027 200 EA COMPRESSION CONNECTOR, 210-1 TO 2/0-1 ACSR 0.19 0.21 1.33 0.26 0.38 0.19 0.23 0.18 ' BLACKBURN #WR279 0.32 0.38 1.93 0.33 0.48 0.33 0.35 0.33 11 36-4028 100 EA COMPRESSION CONNECTOR, 4/0-3/0 TO 2/0-1 ACSR, BLACKBURN #WR399 0.34 " 0.42 1.93 0.41 0.48 0.36 0.35 0.37 12 36-4033 100 EA COMPRESSION CONNECTOR 4/0-3/0 TO 2-6 ACSR BLACKBURN #WR379 0.34 0.40 1.93 0.33 0.35 0.34 0.35 0.33 13 36-4030 50 EA COMPRESSION CONNECTOR 336-336 TO 336-336 ACSR, BLACKBURN #WR775 2.88 4.85 6.26 5.88 1.73 ' 4.98 NB NB 14 36-4034 25 EA COMPRESSION CONNECTOR 477-336 TO 2/0-6 ACSR, BLACKBURN #WR815 2.44 2.42 5.08 6.92 1.51 2.35 NB NB 15 36-4037 25 EA COMPRESSION CONNECTOR 4/0-4/0 to 4/0-410 ACSR, BLACKBURN #WR419 0.33 ' 0.44 1.93 0.45 0.40 0.42 0.41 0.38 PAGE 2 - ELECTRICAL BID EST. 6 MO. NO. STOCK # CITY UNIT DESCRIPTION 16 36-4035 25 EA COMPRESSION CONNECTOR 795-477 TO 336-1/0 ACSR, BLACKBURN #WR949 17 36-4036 25 EA COMPRESSION CONNECTOR 795-477 TO 795-477 ACSR, BLACKBURN #WR989 18 36-4029 25 EA COMPRESSION CONNECTOR 336-336 TO 4/0 BLACKBURN #839 19 36-4031 25 EA PARALLEL GROVE CONNECTOR CU-AL #8STR-1/0 ACSR - MAIN,#8STR-1/0 ACSR - TAP BLACKBURN #PAC 345 20 36-4032 100 EA PARALLEL GROVE CONNECTOR CU-AL, 1/0-366 ACSR - MAIN, #8 SOL-1/0 STIR - TAP BLACKBURN #PAC-7 21 36-4340 25 EA COPPER CRIMPETS C-TYPE, #4-6 SOLID, BLACKBURN #CFS-44 22 36-4179 100 EA GROUND ROD CLAMPS TYPE GIRD 5/8 ROD WIRE SIZE 10 SOL.-lSTR., BURNDY GIRD 5/8 23 36-4184 100 EA HOTLINE CLAMPS 2/0-6 TO 110-8, ANDERSON BH-00 24 36-4360 600 EA TRANSFORMER TANK GROUNDING TERMINAL 8 SOL.-2STR., BLACKBURN TTC-2 25 36-4450 400 EA TERMINAL LUG, #6-250 MCM, BRONZE BODY -TIN PLATED, ALL PURPOSE PENN UNION LSN 025 NTN/ANDERSON TLS-42-TP ONLY 26 36-4451 200 EA TERMINAL LUG, 1/0 - 500 MCM, BRONZE BODY - TIN PLATED ALL PURPOSE PENN UNION LSN 050 NTN/ANDERSON TLS-62-TP ONLY 27 36-4055 24 EA PIN TYPE INSULATOR 1" L.H. 55-3, PORCELAIN PR. #2613 (C) NECK 28 36-4056 100 EA PIN TYPE INSULATOR 1" L.H. 55-4, PORCELAIN PRO #366S (F) NECK 29 36-4057 480 EA SUSPENSION INSULATOR 6, BELL PORCELAIN PRO #86012 30 36-4059 100 EA SPOOL INSUI ATnR 3" pnRr Gi ew oon esz,nt POWER CUMMINS KBS SUPPLY PM&N SWEUS TECHLINE TEMPLE WESCO 14.72 14.40 17.13 8.27 NB 14.72 10.50 4.35 14.72 14.40 17.81 8.27 5.21 14.72 10.50 4.25 " 4.24 4.15 5.46 NB NB 4.24 NB NB 1.64 * 2.89 3.61 2.87 NB 1.80 NB NB 3.22 3.40 4.00 3.26 NB 2.25 * NB NB 0.41 * 0.78 1.47 0.51 NB 0.76 0.43 0.56 0.77 0.68 0.64 0.65 NB 0.80 0.63 0.63 5.09 5.95 8.79 4.49 ' NB 4.75 NB NB 1.72 1.42 3.00 NB NB 1.67 1.45 1.44 4.91 3.15 1.99 * NB NB 4.34 NB 3.98 9.85 5.20 2.95 * NB NB 5.06 NB 2.87 2.65 2.36 " 2.47 2.46 NB 2.58 2.70 2.39 3.45 3.10 2.94 * 3.42 NB 3.44 3.68 3.19 7.17 7.55 7.51 7.14 NB 7.08 7.52 6.36 * 0.97 1.05 0.95 1.04 NB 1.03 1.12 0.93 * PAGE 3 - ELECTRICAL BID EST. 6MO. NO. 31 STOCK # 36-4310 QTY 25 UNIT EA DESCRIPTION NICOPRESS SLEEVE #6 SOLID COPPER, CUMMINS KBS POWER SUPPLY PM&N SWEUS TECHLINE TEMPLE WESCO NICOPRESS #1-162-J 32 36-4316 25 EA TENSION SPLICE SLEEVE 1/0 ACSR, KEARNEY 0.54 0.64 0.76 0.56 NB 0.57 0.59 0.54 #OH 1/0-61/AS 33 36-4317 25 EA TENSION SPLICE SLEEVE #4 ACSR, KEARNEY 3.28 * 6.34 11.95 4.40 NB 8.92 6.25 NB #OH4-61-71 /AS 34 36-4318 25 EA AUTOMATIC SLEEVE FOR 2/0 ACSR 2.76 * 4.40 7.30 3.12 NB 7.02 4.89 NB 35 36-4321 10 EA JUMPER SLEEVE FOR 795 AAC 9.75 10.85 19.10 NS NB 6.08 * 15.71 10.16 BURNDY #YCS43R, MUST FIT BURNDY DIE 342 36 36-4322 25 EA JUMPER SLEEVE FOR 336 ACSR, 26-7 14.30 * NB NB 15.10 NB NB NB NB BURNDY #YCS341 RL, MUST FIT BURNDY DIE 327 37 36-4326 25 EA FULL TENSION SLEEVE FOR 4/0 5.85 * NB NS 6.20 NB NB NB NB BURNDY #YDS28R 38 36-4327 10 EA FULL TENSION SLEEVE FOR 336.4, 26-7 10.15 * NB NB 10.27 NB NB NB NB BURNDY#YDS32R 39 36-4328 10 EA FULL TENSION SLEEVE FOR 210 17.15 * NB NB 18.09 NB NB 59.50 NB BURNDY#YDS26RL 40 36-4329 20 EA FULL TENSION SLEEVE FOR 1/0 ACSR, 4.40 * NB NB 4.63 NB NB 11.30 NB BURNDY YDS25RL 41 36-4330 10 EA FULL TENSION SLEEVE FOR 795 AAC 4.00 * NB NB 4.40 NB NB 6.25 NB MUST FIT BURNDY DIE 342 42 36-4331 40 EA AUTOMATIC TENSION SLEEVE ACSR FOR 1/0 40.75 * NB NB 84.00 NB NB NB NB FARGO GL406 43 36-4332 40 EA AUTOMATIC TENSION SLEEVE ACSR FOR #4 5.99 6.30 11.95 NB NB 6.08 9.84 5.86 FARGO GL402 44 36-4336 25 EA AUTOMATIC TENSION SLEEVE ACSR FOR 4/0 4.15 3.89 7.30 NB NB 3.51 * 6.69 3.72 45 36-4337 25 EA AUTOMATIC TENSION SLEEVE ACSR FOR 336, 26-7 14.64 13.00 30.50 NS NB 9.80 * 25.12 10.98 46 36-4333 25 EA AUTOMATIC TENSION SLEEVE SOLID COPPER - 16.19 16.00 " 48.00 NB NB NS 26.05 17.24 FOR #6, FARGO GL111 2.14 2.05 4.15 NB NB NB 5.98 1.95 PAGE 4 - ELECTRICAL BID EST. 6 MO. POWER NO. STOCK # QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION CUMMINS KBS SUPPLY PM&N SWEUS TECHLINE TEMPLE WESCO 47 36-4334 25 EA AUTOMATIC TENSION SLEEVE SOLID COPPER - FOR #4, FARGO GL112 2.24 2.20 2.76 NB NB NB 7.03 2.23 48 36-4102 25 EA WRAPLOCK TIES #1/0 ACSR, C NECK INSULATORS PREFORMED #WTC-0112 ONLY 3.50 * NB NB 3.51 NB 2.88 *' 4.03 NB 49 36-4103 25 EA WRAPLOCK TIES #4/0 ACSR, F NECK INSULATORS PREFORMED #WTF-0218 ONLY 4.66 NB 5.58 4.67 NB 3.82 ** 5.37 NB 50 36-4104 50 EA WRAPLOCK TIES 336 ACSR, F NECK INSULATORS PREFORMED #WTJ-0422 ONLY 6.63 NB NB 6.64 NB 6.95 "* 7.63 NB 51 36-4105 50 EA WRAPLOCK TIES, F-NECK, 1/0 ACSR PREFORMED #WTF-0212 ONLY 3.60 " NB 4.33 3.32 NB 2.05 *' 4.17 NB 52 36-4106 25 EA WRAPLOCK TIES, F-NECK, #4 ACSR PREFORMED #WITF-0200 ONLY 3.39 * NB 4.69 5.65 NB 3.35 *` 3.94 NB 53 36-4107 25 EA WRAPLOCK TIES, F-NECK #2/0 ACSR PREFORMED #WTF214 ONLY 3.78 * NB 4.53 3.79 NB 3.00 ** 4.36 N B 54 36-4190 200 EA GUY GRIP 3/8", MUST BE TWISTED LOOP PREFORMED #GDE-1107 OR HELICAL ONLY 1.65 * 1.64 3.16 1.52 NB 1.47 *" 3.98 N B 55 36-4110 25 EA SPOOL TIES #4 ACSR, PREFORMED #SPL-1352P 56 36-4111 25 EA SPOOL TIES #1/0 ACSR PREFORMED 1.04 NB NB 1.05 NB 1.06 1.78 NB #SPL-1356P 57 36-4112 25 EA SPOOL TIES #4/0 ACSR PREFORMED 1.59 * NB NB 2.38 NB 1.72 2.73 NB #SPL-1358P 58 36-4113 25 EA SPOOL TIES 336, 26/7 ACSR 1.72 NB 2.90 1.74 NB 1.64 * 2.79 NB 59 36-4114 50 EA DOUBLE SUPPORT/DOUBLE ARM TIE, F-NECK, 4.22 NB NB NB NB 3.05 * 4.49 NB 1/0ACSR, PREFORMED#DST-0153 6.17 " NB NB 6.62 NB 6.21 8.03 NB 60 36-4115 25 EA DOUBLE SUPPORT/DOUBLE ARM TIE FOR F-NECK 336 ACSR, PREFORMED #DST-0158 10.41 NB NB 9.62 NB 7.75 * 11.06 NB PAGE 5 - ELECTRICAL BID EST. NO. STOCK # 6 MO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION CUMMINS KBS POWER SUPPLY PMBN SWEUS TECHLINE TEMPLE WESCO 61 36-4296 100 EA DEAD IN WRAP #4 ACSR, HELICAL HD514 OR EQUAL 0.59 " 0.74 1.67 0.55 NB 0.66 1.46 NB 62 36-4298 25 EA DEAD IN WRAP #2/0 ACSR, HELICAL HD524 OR EQUAL 63 36-4299 25 EA DEAD IN WRAP #4/0 ACSR, HELICAL HD528 OR EQUAL 1.80 1.84 NB 1.63 NB 1.69 " 3.90 NB 2.88 2.66 • 3.89 2.16 NB 3.30 6.70 NB 64 36-4297 100 EA DEAD IN WRAP #1/0, HELICAL HD522 OR EQUAL 1.45 1.28 * 2.22 1.25 NB 1.33 3.19 NB 65 36-4140 24 EA ANCHOR; 8 WAY, 10,000# GRIPTITE #A322812 5 .24 4.74 * 5.76 4.99 N S 4.80 5.11 4.82 66 36-4141 24 EA ANCHOR; 8 WAY, 20,000# GRIPTITE #A322103 67 36-4143 50 EA ANCHOR ROD TWIN EYE 20,000# 12.85 11.15 * NB 14.56 NB 11.80 11.88 12.15 8' X 3/4" 68 36-4142 25 EA ANCHOR ROD TWIN EYE 10,000# 8.09 8.10 12.48 8.23 8.66 8.10 8.85 8.09 69 36-4191 25 EA GUY GUARDS (YELLOW) 5.32 5.40 N B 6.75 15.15 N B 5.89 5.23 • 3.03 2.69 * 3.51 2.99 NB 2.95 3.66 2.70 70 36-4004 120 EA 1500W 240V CLEAR QUARTZ LAMP #Q1500T3/CL 11.80 NB 10.30 7.05 NB 6.30 " 7.85 N B 71 36-4006 150 EA TWIST LOCK PHOTO ELECTRIC CONTROL, FISHER -PIERCE #7760 72 36-4011 12 EA 1500 W METAL HALIDE LAMPS 4.50 6.25 10.25 4.35 NB 4.15 " 4.88 4.42 53.17 NB NB 25.00 NB NB NB 45.50 73 36-4012 25 EA 10OW HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM SECURITY LIGHT PKG., AMERCIAN ELECTRIC #11-57015-6/PKG B 61.10 54.40 NB 53.00 NB 56.25 60.30 51.92 74 36-4013 150 EA 100W HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM, LAMP ONLY SYLVANIA LU-100 14.01 13.60 13.13 8.97 * NB 10.20 12.85 9.51 75 36-4014 24 EA 200W HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM, LAMP ONLY SYLVANIA LU-200 15.25 13.90 13.13 " 13.33 NB 17.55 28.90 18.95 76 36-4015 24 EA 400W HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM, LAMP ONLY SYLVANIA LU-400 16.16 13.60 13.13 9.78 * NB 11.15 31.40 10.72 77 24 EA 10OW METAL HALIDE PHILIPS MH100/U/M 30.92 NB 24.38 " NB NB NB NB NB 78 36-4161 250 EA LAG SCREWS #508754 0.34 0.34 0.60 0.30 * N B 0.46 0.46 0.39 79 36-4144 100 EA MACHINE BOLTS, 5/8" X 10", COOPER DF3610 0.58 0.57 0.77 0.57 0.61 .545 • 0.64 0.59 PAGE 6 - ELECTRICAL BID EST. 6 MO NO. STOCK # CITY UNIT DESCRIPTION 80 36-4145 600 EA MACHINE BOLT 5/8" X 12", MCGRAW #DF3B12 81 36-4146 100 EA MACHINE BOLTS 5/8" X 14", COOPER DF31314 82 36-4147 50 EA MACHINE BOLTS, 3/4" X 10", COOPER DF41310 83 36-4148 200 EA MACHINE BOLTS, 3/4" X 12,", COOPER DF41312 84 36-4149 50 EA MACHINE BOLTS, 3/4" X 14", COOPER DF41314 85 36-4181 100 EA OVAL EYE BOLTS 5/8" X 12" MCGRAW DF2E12 86 36-4178 25 EA OVAL EYE BOLTS 5/8" X 24", COOPER DF2E24 87 36-4175 25 EA OVAL EYE BOLTS 3/4" X 10", COOPER DF3E10 88 36-4176 50 EA OVAL EYE BOLTS 3/4" X 17, COOPER DF3E12 89 36-4177 25 EA OVAL EYE BOLTS 3/4" X 14", COOPER DF3E14 90 36-4180 200 EA OVAL EYE NUTS 5/8" MCGRAW #DG2E3 91 36-4182 100 EA OVAL EYE NUTS 314" 92 36-4150 25 EA D.A. BOLTS 5/8" X 20" 93 36-4151 50 EA D.A. BOLTS 5/8" X 14" 94 36-4155 50 EA D.A. BOLTS 5/8" X 16' 95 36-4152 50 EA D.A. BOLTS 5/8" X 18" 96 36-4153 25 EA D.A. BOLTS 5/8" X 22 97 36-4154 25 EA D.A. BOLTS 5/8" X 24" 98 36-4160 200 EA CARRIAGE BOLTS, 1/2" X 6" POWER SWEUS TECHLINE TEMPLE WESCO CUMMINS KBS SUPPLY PM&N 0.63 0.63 0.89 0.63 0.68 0.62 0.71 0.66 0.689 * 0.71 0.97 0.72 0.78 0.69 0.80 0.69 1.26 1.22 1.89 1.26 1.22 1.58 1.15 1.24 1.149 * 1.20 1.91 1.37 1.21 1.30 1.34 1.42 1.28 1.31 2.12 1.47 1.22 • 1.72 1.46 1.49 1.84 1.92 2.71 1.94 2.03 1.85 2.13 1.83 • 3.99 5.05 2.88 * NB 3.93 NB 4.04 NB 5.09 3.34 • 5.46 3.98 3.43 4.12 5.88 3.85 5.21 4.10 * 6.25 3.64 4.80 4.55 6.01 4.82 4.98 4.32 * 6.27 4.57 4.41 4.66 6.25 4.84 1.11 1.00 1.21 1.22 1.07 0.93 1.38 0.92 • 1.12 1.08 * 2.16 1.22 1.42 1.55 1.68 N B 1.47 1.45 * 2.85 1.47 1.62 1.50 1.77 1.56 1.50 1.53 2.34 1.35 1.45 1.65 1.62 3.90 1.50 1.39 * 2.54 1.49 1.48 1.79 1.62 3.99 1.399 1.41 * 2.65 1.52 1.47 1.50 1.66 4.10 1.61 1.60 * 3.03 1.71 1.80 1.61 1.89 4.50 1.73 1.71 * 3.15 1.84 1.89 2.25 2.06 4.80 0.65 0.74 0.94 1.68 0.63 0.64 0.69 0.69 PAGE 7 - ELEC, i KII.HL BID EST 6 MO POWER NO. STOCK # QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION CUMMINS KBS SUPPLY PM&N SWEUS TECHLINE TEMPLE WESCO 99 36-4159 50 EA CARRIAGE BOLTS, 3/8" X 5" 100 36-4125 50 EA CROSSARM PINS -STEEL, CHANCE 881 0.36 0.32 " 0.50 0.36 0.65 0.36 0.40 0.36 101 36-4126 24 EA POLETOP PINS 1.90 2.02 2.89 1.90 1.95 1.89 * 2.25 2.34 102 10 EA TRANSFORMER MOU NTING BRACKETS 3.85 3.93 NB 3.79 5.87 3.83 * 4.31 NB AB CHANCE #C212-8003 144.70 NB NB NB 69.79 * 136.75 NB N S 103 10 EA TRANSFORMER MOUNTING BRACKETS AB CHANCE #C212-8006 217.64 NB 125.60 NB 139.25 185.00 NB NB 104 25 EA CLAMP BOLTS FOR GUYS, 1/2" AB CHANCE #6450 105 25 EA CLAMP BOLTS FOR GUYS, 5/8" 3.15 N S 3.59 2.96 N S 2.61 * NB 2.97 AB CHANCE #6461 106 36-4189 50 EA GUY ATTACHMENTS, HVY. DUTY, 5/8" HOLE 3.58 NB NB 1.92 ' NB 3.63 NB 3.08 STANLY G. FLAGG & CO. #P135A 107 36-4188 50 EA GUY ATTACHMENTS, HVY. DUTY, 3/4" HOLE 1.82 1.60 NB 1.91 N B 1.30 2.01 NB STANLY G, FLAGG & CO. #0133A 108 36-4183 150 EA WIDE BASE CLEVIS, MCGRAW #DC2C1 2.30 2.29 * NB 2.48 NB 2.65 2.65 NB 109 36-4300 500 EA SQUARE WASHER 2 1/4"; 11116" HOLE 2.67 2.67 NB 2.80 2.73 2.75 3.08 NB MCGRAW #DEZW4 110 36-4301 100 EA SQUARE CURVED WASHER 3" X 3" 11/16 HOLE 0.14 0.15 0.22 0.15 0.16 0.14 0.17 0.16 111 36-4302 500 EA ROUND WASHERS 1 3/8" DIA. X 9/16" HOLE 0.40 0.39 0.85 0.41 0.46 0.41 0.48 0.49 COOPER #DF1W2 112 36-4303 100 EA SQUARE CURVED WASHER 4" X 4", 13116 HOLE .049 .049 N B 0.04 0.06 0.06 0.14 0.05 113 36-4290 150 EA THIMBLE CLEVIS, MCGRAW DG9TI 0.82 0.86 1.55 0.84 0.90 0.80 * 0.85 NB NB NB NB 2.88 NB 2.85 * NB NB 114 36-4170 100 EA HOTLINE STIRRUP 4-1/0 ACSR ANDERSON #AHLS-022019-E 6.85 NB NB NB NB 7.25 9.16 NB 115 36-4171 20 EA HOTLINE STIRRUP 1/0-397.5 116 36-4172 10 EA HOTLINE STIRRUP 795 MCM 22.30 NB NB NB NB 14.25 * 19.86 NB 117 50 EA CROSSARM 3 5/8" X 4 518" X 8' 36.30 NB NB NB NB 20.25 * 28.46 NB #X-ARM-B-R 118 25 EA CROSS ARM ASSEMBLY, HVY DUTY 8' 30.16 27.15 * 35.26 29.35 29.78 30.50 32.07 34.00 HUGHES 2890-B 162.00 NB 174.00 NB NB 155.00 " 169.45 NB PAGE 8 - ELECTRICAL BID EST 6 MO NO. STOCK # CITY UNIT DESCRIPTION 119 36-4400 20 PR WOOD BRACE 28", JOSLYN J5526 120 50 EA WOOD BRACE 60" SPAND, HUGHES B2604CC30 121 36-4200 75 EA CUTOUTS, 100 AMP, 7.2/14.4 ABB XINCANAAI I 122 36-4220 6 EA LOADBREAK CUTOUT, 8.3 KV, 200 AMP, WITH ARC CHUTE, NO LINK BREAKS, ABB 279C789A05 123 36-4221 200 EA LOADBREAK ELBOWS, 200 AMP, 1/0 STRAND ALUM. 220 ML., RTE #2604, 124 36-4222 100 EA POLE TERMINATIONS, JOSLYN E5200-BN-1/OS-MTG-1 125 36-4251 100 EA 9/10 KV LIGHTENING ARRESTOR, ABB 634A100A10 126 36-4187 100 EA WEDGE CLAMP 1/0-4 ACSR, BLACKBURN #W20-1 127 36-4186 100 EA WEDGE CLAMP 1/0-4/0 ACSR, BLACKBURN #W40-1 128 36-4185 250 EA WEDGE CLAMP 2-6 ACSR, BLACKBURN #W62-1 129 36-4193 100 EA POLE EYE PLATES FOR GUY STRAIN INSULATORS STANLY FLAGG & CO. #PX88 130 36-4083 100 EA LINE FUSE, 1 AMP KEARNEY #11001 131 36-4084 100 EA LINE FUSE, 2 AMP KEARNEY #11002 132 36-4085 100 EA LINE FUSE TYPE 20 DEGREE FITALL, 3 AMP 133 36-4086 100 EA LINE FUSE TYPE 20 DEGREE FITALL, 8 AMP KEARNEY #11008 134 36-4087 50 EA LINE FUSE TYPE 20 DEGREE FITALL, 5 AMP KEARNEY #11005 135 36-4088 50 EA LINE FUSE TYPE 20 DEGREE FITALL, 10 AMP KEARNEY #11010 136 36-4089 50 EA LINE FUSE TYPE 20 DEGREE FITALL, 15 AMP KEARNEY #11015 137 36-4090 25 EA LINE FUSE TYPE 20 DEGREE FITALL, 20 AMP KEARNEY #11020 POWER CUMMINS KBS SUPPLY PM&N SWEUS TECHINE TEMPLE WESCO 4.17 NB 5.00 4.30 4.07 3.61 4.43 4.21 7.95 * NB 11.65 8.00 9.34 9.12 13.75 NB 39.57 NB NB 37.37 ' NB 39.25 44.30 37.50 117.90 NB NB NB NB 109.42 NB 94.70 * 23.75 21.00 * NB NB 24.73 21.54 NB 23.53 44.50 NB NB 33.39 NB 176.83 NB 31.18 * 27.22 23.90 * NB 27.05 45.20 26.50 NB 23.98 1.20 1.45 1.87 1.47 NB 1.20 2.07 1.18 * 1.61 1.58 2.43 1.63 NB 1.59 2.83 1.58 0.73 0.85 1.12 0.87 NB 0.73 1.28 0.73 4.63 4.02 NB 3.57 ' NB 5.82 NB 4.28 2.53 * NB 3.63 NB NB NB 2.78 3.40 2.53 * NS 3.63 NB NB NB 2.78 3.40 2.24 * NB 3.63 NB NB NB 2.47 * 2.98 NB NB 5.55 NB NB NB 2.47 * 2.98 2.28 * NB 3.63 NB NB NB 2.47 2.98 2.28 * NB 3.63 NB NB NB 2.47 2.98 2.28 * NB 3.63 NB NB NB 2.47 2.98 2.28 * NB 3.63 NB NB NB 2.47 2.98 PAGE 9 - ELECTRICAL BID EST 6MO NO. STOCK # QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION 138 36-4091 25 EA LINE FUSE TYPE 20 DEGREE FITALL, 25 AMP KEARNEY #11025 139 36-4092 25 EA LINE FUSE TYPE 20 DEGREE FITALL, 30 AMP KEARNEY #11030 140 36-4093 25 EA LINE FUSE TYPE 20 DEGREE FITALL, 40 AMP KEARNEY #11040 141 36-4094 50 EA LINE FUSE TYPE 20 DEGREE FITALL, 50 AMP KEARNEY #11050 142 36-4095 25 EA LINE FUSE TYPE 20 DEGREE FITALL, 65 AMP KEARNEY #11065 143 36-4096 50 EA LINE FUSE TYPE 20 DEGREE FITALL, 80 AMP KEARNEY #11080 144 36-4097 25 EA LINE FUSE TYPE 20 DEGREE FITALL, 100 AMP KEARNEY #11100 145 36-4098 25 EA LINE FUSE TYPE 20 DEGREE FITALL, 125 AMP KEARNEY #11125 146 36-4099 25 EA LINE FUSE TYPE 20 DEGREE FITALL, 150 AMP KEARNEY #11150 147 36-4258 4 LB #4 ALUMINUM TIE WIRE, 25# COIL 148 36-4259 4 LB #6 ALUMINUM TIE WIRE, 25# COIL 149 36-4075 24 EA METER SOCKET, 100 AMP, 4 TERMINAL, 1 114" HUB, G.E, #741x13G96 150 36-4077 72 EA METER SOCKET, 200 AMP, 4 TERMINAL, 2" HUB, G. E. #743x1 G 103 151 36-4079 6 EA METER SOCKET, 200 AMP, 7 TERMINAL, 2" HUB, G.E, #741x30G1 152 36-4076 48 EA METER SOCKET, 100 AMP, 4 TERMINAL, 2" HUB 153 36-4080 4 EA METER SOCKET, 13 TERMINAL, 1" HUB, MILBANK #UC7545WL CUMMINS KBS 2.45 * NB 2.45 * NB 3.05 NB 3.05 NB 4.40 NB 5.25 5.25 13.60 13.60 1.64 1.71 21.50 21.79 85.45 21.95 101.10 NB NB NB NB NB NB 20.72 29.48 87.92 20.72 93.06 POWER SUPPLY PM&N SWEUS TECHLINE TEMPLE WESCO 3.63 NB NB NB 2.67 3.24 3.63 NB NB NB 2.67 3.24 3.67 NB NB NB 2.86 * 3.44 3.67 NB NB NB 2.86 • 3.44 5.38 NB NB NB 4.12 * 5.03 6.31 NB NB NB 4.87 * 5.91 6.31 NB NB NB 4.87 * 15.91 16.31 NB NB NB 12.65 * 15.26 16.31 NB NB NB 12.65 * 15.26 2.00 1.54 ' 1.78 1.65 1.86 1.65 2.20 2.17 1.78 1.75 2.16 1.69 * 16.97 17.45 16.45 15.45 * 23.22 15.78 21.70 16.69 N B 17.75 34.21 16.97 * 89.58 70.60 N B 68.20 * 98.50 88.45 16.97 17.45 N B 26.13 23.22 16.20 * 99.68 79.75 ' N B 83.70 104.27 82.15 PAGE 10 - ELECTRICAL BID EST NO. STOCK # 6MO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION CUMMINS KBS POWER SUPPLY PM&N SWEUS TECHLINE TEMPLE WESCO 154 36-4070 300 EA METER 4 TERM., 240V-3W, CLASS 200,TYPE D5S ABB5570C01G060NLY 155 36-4390 5 EA METER CAN, 6 TERMINAL WITH 1"HUB 31.90 NB NB NB NB NB NB 26.95 " MILBANK #1299WL 156 36-4391 2 EA METER CAN, 8 TERMINAL WITH 1" HUB 60.39 52.03 53.45 48.35 NB NB 58.30 43.00 MILBANK #S7235WL 157 36-4392 6 EA METER CAN, 13 TERMINAL WITH 10 TEST BLOCK, 79.71 56.50 87.05 43.35 * NB N S 63.25 63.80 1" HUB, MILBANK #U7449-WL-TS10-0109 ONLY 153 36-4380 2 EA CURRENT TRANSFORMERS, POLE MOUNT 200:5 188.98 173.50 NB 154.00 * NB NB 194.40 NB SMALL 154 36-4381 6 EA CURRENT TRANSFORMERS, POLE MOUNT 200:5 32.40 32.50 NB 35.00 32.04 NB 53.68 NB BIG 155 36-4382 12 EA CURRENT TRANSFORMERS, POLE MOUNT 400:5 41.70 41.80 NB 39.15 * 41.88 NB 85.40 NB BIG 156 36-4383 6 EA CURRENT TRANSFORMERS, POLE MOUNT 600:5 41.70 41.00 NB 39.15 41.68 NB 55.98 NB BIG 157 36-4384 12 EA CURRENT TRANSFORMERS, PAD MOUNT 400:5 41.70 41.00 NB 39.15 41.68 N S 68.04 NB 158 36-4385 12 EA CURRENT TRANSFORMERS, PAD MOUNT 600:5 56.60 56.40 * NB 60.00 57.20 NB 64.06 N B 159 36-4386 6 EA POTENTIAL TRANSFORMERS 300, 2.5:1 RATIO 56.60 56.40 NB 60.00 55.11 NB 64.06 NB 160 36-4387 6 EA POTENTIAL TRANSFORMERS 480, 4:1 RATIO 93.95 * 101.00 NB 147.82 94.00 NB 154.25 N B 161 36-4350 24 EA ELECTRICAL JOINT COMPOUND PENETROX 93.95 " 101.00 N B 147.82 94.00 NB 157.28 NB 8 OZ SQUEEZE BOTTLE 162 36-4460 - 48 EA CIRCUIT BREAKERS, CUTLER HAMMER CA2125 ONLY 3.80 * 5.00 NB 4.10 NB 5.93 5.48 3.92 163 36-4461 24 EA CIRCUIT BREAKERS, CUTLER HAMMER CA2200 ONLY NB NB NB NB NB NB NB 223.00 164 36-4462 5 EA CIRCUIT BREAKERS, SQUARE D #1 DQ21-2200 ONLY NB NB NB NB NB , NB NB 223.00 123.30 " NB NB NB NS NB NB NB * Low Bid ** Does not meet specifications Council meeting April 23, 1996 Item No. AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET SUBJECT: Consideration of a Resolution to authorize a License to Encroach into the platted public utility easement located along Reinhardt Boulevard of Churchill Farms, Section Five, Block A, Lot 14, located at 412 Stonehedge Boulevard :,_ ITEM SUMMARY: The Director of the Community Owned Utilities Division and other utility providers have agreed to allow a License to Encroach into the platted 25 foot public utility easement located along Reinhardt Boulevard as illustrated in Exhibit A. This request is being made to allow the construction of a fence within the public utility easement. The proposed fence would encroach into both the platted public utility easement and the front yard setback. In a separate agenda item, the City Council will consider a request for a variance for the fence to encroach by ten (10) feet into the platted front yard setback and PUE that exists in the same location on this lot. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: None. FINANCIAL EMPACT: None. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Unless otherwise stated, the City Council's action on this item will approve the requested License to Encroach in accordance with the recommendation of the Director of Community Owned Utilities. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A Resolution Submitted By: Edward J. Barry, A CP - Director Division of Development Services Hildy L.A-ngrL, AICP Chief P er -1 r X � 3 1 Q I I , I I I / r 6 N710000 �7 h 00 •s b � . �� 00 4 4L�00 �� ; Q //O� 30' ELECTRIC EASEMENT oor sespp. odor°-� (I I^ •..Y= ��� yy�; VN VOL. 1369. PG, 108�ShgAOo�p-t � LOT 15 ti00ti`' `� ,T M1GO�. to 6 o Sy p0' , s°0 00'C �� Q g $ 6 se. c.00, 04 /Di� FS `'~ STORM 20' 9L.--►r / ;cA..!� s.. ; ; IL DRAINAGE EASEMENT s `, ;,e 3 00- 8.00.DolE ♦ Q 4• / C.2 J6? \6 � � ISO C0 / \e46 462 ` �.& 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN ate , �__ lo.ov ~�YFZ�b °'/ .�• �� / /.59, 6 �,. 5.768 ACRES �p�Oo )?.°0p-C \ 00 7 \,`°• /, i /� 00^H @@� �_ �� NaJs 9 °0 C 0 / 3 .�z/ % — �� / ? / ;13 ..�.. DETENTION POND 4. % O O / /\\ C j 1� l ;'A �- j . 20 DETENTION AREA. 75 296q 4' 1 IL i . Ni 3642 146 E'287 . 6�70NE1EDGE I.%i d 9 30 E SECTION TWO /..-•_� c CA a. ' G . 5LDS. 283-285 PREAKNESS LQ r 1— PLACE O a I I -_ , -- RAL NOTES: STONEHEDGE ' rL I b I TOTAL ACREAGE 11. 659 AC. SECTION ONEtj CAB. ' G , SLDS. 280-2,2 NUMBER OF LOTS: .14 SrD; I D E NUA)BfR Or BLOCKS: I WATER AND SCWER SERVICE 10 BE PROVIDED BY 114E CITY Jr CEORCETOWN, ELECTRICITY TO BE PROVIOCD BY 1U UTII IrIES TELEPHONE TO BE PROVIDED BY GTE. CABLE TV TO BE PROv1UC0 BY WILLIAMSON COUNTY CABLEVISION, PROPOSED USE: SINGLE rAMILY RESIDENTIAL, ONE, STORI.AVAT[P DETENTION LOT, PROPOSED ZONING AS. DENSITY 1.29 LOTS PER ACRE SIZE OF SMALLEST LOT: 10,480 SO. FT. (0. "1 A,; ) THIS SUBDIVISION IS LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY LILIITS OF Trr CITY Or GEORGETOWN. TEXAS. IAAXIIALAA IMPERv10US COVER PER LOT IS 407.. THE PROVISIONS Or THE CENTURY PLAN - DEVELOPPIrENT PLAIT $HALL ALSO GOVERN THIS PROJECT. THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN AF.';ICNE(r VTENSITY LEVEL FIVE, AND THREE, 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN WILL BE FULLY CONTAINED WITIIN DRAINAGE VENTS OR PUBLIC RICHT-0r-WAyS, (10) root WIDE PUBLIC UIILI-T CASCMCI:T (P U C.) "'ALL Fr '1 TO THC STREET R 0 W 'S. ACP,)SS ALL LOOS t"k IN(•C l(.I `,I•`r' F !, M ' 31i,NEHEDCE SECTION LO-i 1 BLG c 1 •v THREE If ' 0 J3'/ z STONEHEDGE '- POOLICLUSHOUSE1 ti24j,ro SECTION THREE t 8 L 0 c K g J / 35 CAB. ' FI' , SLDS. -13-45 0 J PROPOSED DETENTION �4F A, Q / 10 \ � V / �� STONEHEDGE 3 1 ;� ' �/- 8 0 U L E V A R D LQ h QQ /%/ �S tee�,A 1 �` SECTION FOUR (� I c'2 3 N75'30'00'E 267.19' C4 W POND '\ // / �Tl) OWh o /$tip 7b�b �~ / K '�� r \ O /�0 E. A _ CIS- 42.19'• 1 .. C' -70.00'•-)0.00'• ••'CLAD.'... J` Ao' . A 33 \ v f V �Cp� C6P " Pint. l F 7 -. 1j J //�•�' G "\ S@ % O ^�.. \. " } \y��g�?� �c� 1 DETENTION aRGA Luw• 00• r I 1/ L 1 n' r L_ 363 t30 8 _p t-' _-O.00., ?gg0 � < D ' 11 I W12 1 13 I ':t�'' jT! 40 E-2,9-47.235.8 / A- /`� =v%^ 50S9o4BO•C/ I41P•U� �)p�_?•_'p G L� ./�1�i\ �1G o q g ry �g �'•''••'� . / W / C. / .O0'_ G C2 •C`t•' t• \ .\\ U, ,n �� n In m ::•:...t Fence ce __.c10' e�f''L \ o `6 _ proposed Go ,� vt6 59 00 .c4 2 a /3 ` ? /; P. �`�o y a�s_� _ .._ \ \\0 9 1 N I N J� at Is Oo s 0 8 3$ �- �� a ,a LI I [; °� 0 5 I iw 1 'ra \ � 8 � �a•. 14� ao'B.L e � p( f '- 'P.0 \�'• U1 G8.33' 35.67' ^h F 13) ACCESS TO FZEIN14ARCT BOULEVARD IS PROHIBITED rP(w LOT 14. K OCK •A'. 141 I.k IDP TO GRADING, ANY TYPE OF EARTH MOVING, CONSTRUCIION Or, ON, 6R UNDER 114E LAND IN THIS SUBDIVISION, A DRAINAGE PLAN DESIGNED BY A REGISTERED PROrESS10NAL ENGINCER SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR THE PROPOSED DCV[LOPMCNT,RCE1pWN AND MODIF-ICATIONS THEREOF TO THE ENCINE.ERING DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF CEO AND THE COAWISS10NCRS' COURT OF WILLIAMSON COVNir fort REVIEW AND APPROVAL, IS) A rCNCC MEETING THE REOUIPCMENTS OF SECTION 37040 Or THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE SHALL BE PROVIDED AS THE (Il1FFERIARO ALONG THE GEORGETOWN INNER LOOP, IG) PLAT VARIANCE NOIE$- A VARIANC[ WAS GRANTCO FOR THISPLAT 10 ALLOW ONLY A SIX (6) r(,OI FENCE BE PkOvIDEO WTIEN A IrPC .C. BUFrER)ARD 1$ PEOUIRCD A VARIANCE WAS GRANTED 10 ALLOW THE RATIO Or LOT LCNC1,+ U. Lol WIC,TI+ '0 EXCEED 2 S I FOR LOTS 6-14 LEGEND • 1/2' IRON ROD FOUND O 1/2' IRON ROD SET A NAIL FOUND ■ MONUMENT FOUND (UNLESS OTHERNTSE NOTED HEREON) P.0 B. POINT or BEGINNING B.L. BUILDING SCTBACI; LINE P, U. C. PUBLIC UTILITY CASCM[NT R. O,W, RICHT-OF-WAY LIZ DRAINAGE EASEMENT rrc FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION SCE PLAT NOTES CHURCHILL FARMS SECTION FIVE RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS OF FACT AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A LICENSE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN AND BILL PALMER, PERTAINING TO THE ENCROACHMENT OF A FENCE INTO THE FRONT PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT LOCATED 15 FEET FROM THE EAST PROPERTY LINE OF LOT 14 -OF CHURCHILL FARMS SUBDIVISION, SECTION FIVE, BLOCK A, AS RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NUMBER 9550950 OF THE OFFICIAL DEED RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS AND LOCATED AT 412 STONEHEDGE BOULEVARD; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Georgetown has received an application for a license to encroach into the public utility easement; and WHEREAS, the City of Georgetown has enacted Ordinance No. 1645 regulating, controlling, and governing encroachments; and WHEREAS, in order for a license to be granted by the City Council of the City of Georgetown, the Council must make certain findings of fact; and WHEREAS, after hearing the application of Bill Palmer to encroach into the public utility easement, the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, finds the following facts: 1. That there are no utilities which would be interfered with by the utilization of the property in the proposed manner. 2. That there are no utilities which would interfere with the utilization of the property in the proposed manner. 3. That the existing structure is in such a manner that it would not be feasible to relocate it outside the public utility easement. 4. That the land use in the neighborhood appears to be stable and the use to which this property is being put is not likely to change within the foreseeable future and is compatible with other uses in the neighborhood; and WHEREAS, the City Council after hearing the application and finding the specific facts as stated above now concludes and finds that: Lot 14, Block A, Section Five, Churchill Farms License Resolution No. Page 1 of 3 1. The fact that the proposed fence is in such a manner that it would not be feasible to relocate it outside the public utility easement constitutes special circumstances and conditions affecting the property which if not taken into consideration would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of their property. 2. The fact that the land use is not likely to change within the foreseeable future and that it is not economically feasible to remove the proposed fence that would encroach into the public utility easement does provide a basis for granting the license necessary for the preservation and{ enjoyment of the substantial property rights of the applicant. 3. The fact that the use of the easement area by the property owner does not interfere with the utilities or access to the utilities and is not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or injurious to the property in the area; and WHEREAS, the applicant agrees to accept the terms of the license agreement as presented to them. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, THAT: e'. SECTION 1. The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this resolution are hereby found and declared to be true and correct, and are incorporated by reference herein and expressly made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim. The City Council hereby finds that this resolution implements the following policies of the Century Plan - Development Plan Element: 1. Growth and Physical Development Policy 1, which states: "The City will ensure that future land use patterns provide economic, cultural, and social activities to all residents, businesses and organizations;" and 2. Utilities/Energy Policy 2, which states: "The City will establish utility policies which take into consideration the needs of all citizens of the community and take necessary precautions to prevent harmful ecological impact to the environment;" and further finds that the adoption of this resolution is not inconsistent or in conflict with any other Century Plan Policies, as required by Section 2.03 of the Administrative Chapter of the Policy Plan. SECTION 2. The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute, and the City Secretary to attest thereto on behalf of the City of Georgetown a License Agreement with Bill Palmer, pertaining to the encroachment of a fence located on Lot 14 of Churchill Farms Subdivision, commonly known as 412 Stonehedge Boulevard, into the public utility easement on the east property line. Lot 14, Block A, Section Five, Churchill Farms License Resolution No. Page 2 of 3 SECTION 3. This resolution shall be effective immediately upon adoption. RESOLVED this day of ATTEST: 1996. THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN: Sandra D. Lee By: LEO WOOD City Secretary Mayan APPROVED AS TO FORM: Marianne Landers Banks City Attorney Lot 14, Block A, Section Five, Churchill Farms License Resolution No. Page 3 of 3 Council meeting April 23, 1996 Item No. AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET SUBJECT: Consideration of a resolution to authorize a License to Encroach into the public utility easements and drainage easements located along the rear property lines of Lots 8-13, Block M, Stonehedge Subdivision, Section Two, known as 204, 206, 300, 302, 304, and 306 Belmont Drive. ITEM SUMMARY: All utility providers, including the Director of the Community Owned Utilities Division have agreed to allow a License to Encroach into the public utility easements and drainage easements as illustrated in Exhibit A. This request is made by the property owners of the subject lots to enable them to install fences at the rear property line and to landscape and maintain this area within their back yards. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: None. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. COMMENTS: If this item is approved by the City Council, it will authorize the City Attorney to prepare licenses to encroach for the subject lots. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A Resolution Submitted Bv: Edward J. Barry, AICP - Director Hildy L. kingma, AIC Division of Development Services Chief Planner EXHIBIT A STONEHEDGE SUBDIVISION, SECTION TWO, BLOCK M, LOTS 8 - 13 SOUTH ��50 CARRIAGE RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS OF FACT AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A LICENSE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN AND MARK OR PAM RAMSEY, ERICH KLEIN, DANIEL M. DREPS, MARK AND TINA BOIKE, LAWRENCE E. WREN, AND DAVID WILLIAMS AND BRENDA WILLIAMS; PERTAINING TO THE ENCROACHMENT INTO THE REAR PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS LOCATED ON THE REAR PROPERTY LINES OF LOTS 8-13 OF STONEHEDGE SUBDIVISION, BLOCK M, SECTION TWO, AS RECORDED IN CABINET G, SLIDES 283-285 OF THE PLAT RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS AND LOCATED AT 2049 2069 3009 3029 3049 AND 306 BELMONT DRIVE; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Georgetown has received an application for a license to encroach into the public utility easements and drainage easements; and WHEREAS, in order for a license to be granted by the City Council of the City of Georgetown, the Council must make certain findings of fact; and WHEREAS, after hearing the application of the subject property owners to encroach into the public utility easements and drainage easements, the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, finds the following facts: 1. That there are no utilities which would be interfered with by the utilization of the property in the proposed manner. 2. That there are no utilities which would interfere with the utilization of the property in the proposed manner. 3. That the land use in the neighborhood appears to be stable and the use to which this property is being put is not likely to change within the foreseeable future and is compatible with other uses in the neighborhood; and WHEREAS, the City Council after hearing the application and finding the specific facts as stated above now concludes and finds, that: Multiple Lots Belmont Dr. License Resolution No. Page 1 of 3 I . The fact that the public utility easements and drainage easements are located in such a manner that constitutes special circumstances and conditions affecting the property which if not taken into consideration would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of their property. 2. The fact that the land use is not likely to change within the foreseeable future does provide a basis for granting the license necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of the substantial property rights of the applicant. 3. The fact that the use of the easement area by the property owner does not interfere with the utilities or access to the utilities and is not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or injurious to the property in the area; and WHEREAS, the applicants agree to accept the terms of the license agreement as presented to them. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this resolution are hereby found and declared to be true and correct, and are incorporated by reference herein and expressly made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim. The City Council hereby finds that this resolution implements the following policies of the Century Plan - Development Plan Element: 1. Growth and Physical Development Policy 1, which states: "The City will ensure that future land use patterns provide economic, cultural, and social activities to all residents, businesses and organizations;" and 2. Utilities/Energy Policy 2, which states: "The City will establish utility policies which take into consideration the needs of all citizens of the community and take necessary precautions to prevent harmful ecological impact to the environment;" and further finds. that the adoption of this resolution is not inconsistent or in conflict with any other Century Plan Policies, as required by Section 2.03 of the Administrative Chapter of the Policy Plan. SECTION 2. The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute, and the City Secretary to attest thereto on behalf of the City of Georgetown a License Agreement with Mark or Pam Ramsey, Erich Klein, Daniel M. Dreps, Mark and Tina Boike, Lawrence E. Wren, and David Williams and Brenda Williams pertaining to the encroachment into the public utility easements and drainage easements located on the rear lot lines of Lots 8-13 of Stonehedge Subdivision, Block M, Section Two, commonly known as 204, 206, 300, 302, 304, and 306 Belmont Drive. Multiple Lots Belmont Dr. License Resolution No. Page 2 of 3 SECTION 3. This resolution shall be effective immediately upon adoption. RESOLVED this day of ATTEST: 1996. THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN: Sandra D. Lee By: LEO WOOD City Secretary Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Marianne Landers Banks City Attorney Multiple Lots Belmont Dr. License Resolution No. Page 3 of 3 Council meeting April 23, 1996 Item No. W AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET SUBJECT: Consideration of a Resolution to authorize a License to Encroach into the platted public utility easement located along the west property line of Magnolia Court of Berry Creek, Section Nine, Phase II, Block A, Lot 20, located at 31007 Magnolia Court ITEM SUMMARY: The Director of the Community Owned Utilities Division and other utility providers have agreed to allow a License to Encroach into the platted seven and a half (7.5) foot wide public utility easement located along the west property line of Magnolia Court as illustrated in Exhibit A. This request is being made to allow the construction of a driveway within the public utility easement. The proposed driveway would encroach into the platted public utility easement. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: None. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Unless otherwise stated, the City Council's action on this item will approve the requested License to Encroach in acwrdance with the recommendation of the Director of Community Owned Utilities. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A Resolution Submitted By: Edward J. Barry, P - birector Division of Development Services --A Hildy L n a, AICP Chief er RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS OF FACT AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A LICENSE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN AND HERB ROOKS, PERTAINING TO THE ENCROACHMENT OF A DRIVEWAY INTO THE SIDE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT LOCATED ON THE WEST PROPERTY LINE OF LOT 20 OF BERRY CREEK SUBDIVISION, SECTION NINE, PHASE H, BLOCK A, AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 2410, PAGE 4160 OF THE OFFICIAL DEED RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS AND LOCATED AT 31007 MAGNOLIA COURT; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Georgetown has received an application for a license to encroach into the public utility easement; and WHEREAS, the City of Georgetown has enacted Ordinance No. 1645 regulating, controlling, and governing encroachments; and WHEREAS, in order for a license to be granted by the City Council of the City of Georgetown, the Council must make certain, findings of fact; and WHEREAS, after hearing the application of Herb Rooks to encroach into the public utility easement, the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, finds the following facts: 1. That there are no utilities which would be interfered with by the utilization of the property in the proposed manner. 2. That there are no utilities which would interfere with the utilization of the property in the proposed manner. 3. That the proposed structure is in such a manner that it would not be feasible to relocate it outside the public utility easement. 4. That the land use in the neighborhood appears to be stable and the use to which this property is being put is not likely to change within the foreseeable future and is compatible with other uses in the neighborhood; and WHEREAS, the City Council after hearing the application and finding the specific facts as stated above now concludes and finds that: Lot 20, Berry Creek, Section Nine, Phase II, Block A License Resolution No. Page 1 of 3 1. The fact that the proposed driveway is in such a manner that it would not be feasible to relocate it outside the public utility easement constitutes special circumstances and conditions affecting the property which if not taken into consideration would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of their property. 2. The fact that the land use is not likely to change within the foreseeable future and that it is not economically feasible to remove the part of the proposed driveway that encroaches into the public utility easgpent does provide a basis for granting the license necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of the substantial property rights of the applicant. 3. The fact that the use of the easement area by the property owner does not interfere with the utilities or access to the utilities and is not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or injurious to the property in the area; and WHEREAS, the applicant agrees to accept the terms of the license agreement as presented to them. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this resolution are hereby found and declared to be true and correct, and are incorporated by reference herein and expressly made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim. The City Council hereby finds that this resolution implements the following policies of the Century Plan - Development Plan Element: 1. Growth and Physical Development Policy 1, which states: "The City will ensure that future land use patterns provide economic, cultural, and social activities to all residents, businesses and organizations; " and 2. Utilities/Energy Policy 2, which states: "The City will establish utility policies which take into consideration the needs of all citizens of the community and take necessary precautions to prevent harmful ecological impact to the environment;" and further finds that the adoption of this resolution is not inconsistent or in conflict with any other Century Plan Policies, as required by Section 2.03 of the Administrative Chapter of the Policy Plan. SECTION 2. The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute, and the City Secretary to attest thereto on behalf of the City of Georgetown a License Agreement with Herb Rooks, pertaining to the encroachment of a proposed driveway located on Lot 20 of Berry Creek Subdivision, Section Nine, Phase II, Block A, commonly known as 31007 Magnolia Court, into the public utility easement along the west property line. Lot 20, Berry Creek, Section Nine, Phase II, Block A License Resolution No. Page 2 of 3 SECTION 3. This resolution shall be effective immediately upon adoption. RESOLVED this day of ATTEST: Sandra D. Lee City S ecretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: Marianne Landers Banks City Attorney 1996. THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN: By: LSO WOOD Mayor Lot 20, Berry Creek, Section Nine, Phase U, Block A License Resolution No. Page 3 of 3 Council meeting April 23, 1996 Item No. S AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET SUBJECT: Consideration of a Resolution authorizing the City Attorney to issue a quit claim deed to be filed abandoning the platted public utility easements located along the rear and south side lot lines at Parkview Estates, Block D, Lot 2, known as 102 Parque Vista Drive. ITEM SUMMARY: This request is to abandon the public utility easements (PUEs) located along the rear lot line and the south side lot line of the subject lot. These PUEs are no longer required unless there is a specific need due to the location of utilities. The Director of Community Owned Utilities and other area utility providers have reviewed the application and have agreed to abandon the PUEs as illustrated in Exhibit A. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: None. Vb FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. COMMENTS: RECOMMENDED MOTION: If this item is approved by the City Council, it will authorize the recordation of a quit claim deed abandoning the subject PUEs. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution and exhibit. Submitted Bv: Edward J. Barry, AICP - Director Division of Development Services Hildy L. Ki gma, AICP Chief Planner - EXHIBIT A ., O 102- PARQUE VISTA DRIVE • o 719,P13 o o ! z 0 Qo•o5. fu p. jQ 7, 61 1.0 64, qo ��-� zoS�_d m ?• - — a g •.g � o Q. 0 CZ �o 0 LP tA N /yip h o C9, n O 0 0 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A QUIT CLAIM DEED TO VACATE AND ABANDON A PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT LOCATED ALONG THE REAR AND SOUTH SIDE LOT LINES OF LOT 2, BLOCK D, PARKVIEW ESTATES SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN THE PLAT RECORDS CABINET G, SLIDES 39-41 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, VEXAS, AND LOCATED AT 102 PARQUE VISTA DRIVE. WHEREAS, the City of Georgetown has received an Application for the Vacation of a ten -foot -wide Public Utility Easement located along the rear lot line and a five -foot -wide Public Utility Easement located along the south side lot line of Lot 2, Block D, Parkview Estates Subdivision, as recorded in Cabinet G, Slides 39-41 of the Plat Records of Williamson County, Texas, and located at 102 Parque Vista Drive; and WHEREAS, upon considering the Application and additional information pertaining to the Application, the City Council now finds that there are no utilities existing in the easements and that the utility companies serving the area including and surrounding the easements have determined that there exists no present or foreseeable need for the easements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this resolution are hereby found and declared to be true and correct, and are incorporated by reference herein and expressly made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim. The City Council finds that this action implements the following policies of the Century Plan - Policy Plan: 1. Growth and Physical Development Policy 1, which states "The City will ensure that future land use patterns provide economic, cultural, and social activities to all residents, businesses and organizations; and 2. Utilities/Energy Policy 2, which states "The City will establish Utility policies which take into consideration the needs of all citizens of the community and take necessary precautions to prevent harmful ecological impact on the environment. " The City Council has found that this action is not inconsistent or in conflict with any other Century Plan Policies, as required by Section 2.03 of the Administrative Chapter of the Policy Plan. SECTION 2. The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute, on behalf of the City of Georgetown, a Quit Claim Deed abandoning the ten -foot -wide Public Utility Easement located EXHIBIT D 336J4' \ 5037114TEIN � `'. ' _ k"i7-fib C � ' -0.�fjcL��, � •r� � �v'i Final Plat for River Oaks I.H. 35 1 i Business Park tf) \ d ' JE— ;6b 1 411 1-4 00 zV Iz LO . �S. Y N a 2 ,t -}�jI' ka -` N _ I e ,'r� z 7- Cl T. ! O CD ccl l n d 4 ] 0 •' W `� t `` m I f I I_ (I CD^f m tL7 01 CC- ( p a0 . .�\ z �V� � tLJ cc.414 ' In * a 1 _4 \\ �a 0 r / 'k6b f` 9 Ion, c / /. 1 2.937,'ecres. / O.B75 Iscres ( ' „ �o7r' �• 51 it � I Idj3 s,�gsyr/[. 918fecra,.:t I (�T 14 c�'�' f 4� � c / R 5429.58' g D 14' 14'i 67 LT= 134 CH = 1 is "lli /�;:• ..� , _ - - - S8734'20'W -� - FORK 539.14' _ . -,DIVL Preliminary Plat for River Oaks — I.H. 35 Business Park X c --. n upki 1 I:1' MORN :$M EXHIBIT A I..�E • -E R 0 - RI �OF•O 1 �\\�/�\/�7'// G Z 4oltltt L pN I OR7' ONCET CLUB .ITRT CLUB t32/57e 6.3224 AC BLUC80NMET SAVIN03 BANK, TS8 Q1854 /937 ( 2 594406 AC1 _ Ia 2.1108 AC I17.]1 nC. . IREFER O v 3 081a 111 1 I / 3 1 II17 S LE _,- •Ia00' / `-' 30317 -- - � \ 14 2.1.0 K I \ I BLUCBONNSr SAVIN03 BANK, FS8 _ 't+ 1834/937 (259.4a06AC1 117,33 SC �1 � � r w•rl A4A REFER TO aJr ( 3 Ot/a NO AA •( RKt 0.1.3.D. Ac. 1 i rJ I P 1Kt. J RC ---// r N 6 P TEA I y , P 3pRt-G ST. l .TEEN aEfCR TO .1]t7 1 oe16 VALLEY ST _ J � P � -�• � 1 I 1 1 1.ORROw ST. I t1 / 3 0317 , TAILOR OIBR ALTER 3AVINW A?30CIATION 1 1669/e1 31 . rz Ac. I A V I S0L) f saIV c I (3R/E iI v 1_ OL I `•�'' REFER TO 5 1014 I REFER TO I ) 1016 I 1 � CCuCiCa I r HOLE°w L_ Ivl I ,,j� UTTOF GEORGETO-14 13649 ACJ 2.c ST. I1684 AC. 4IF try L RIVER HILLS DRIVE Y I -.-- o s SITE ,1(Is�l�c— P:` f-PtjAKS QF L:F'-'PGE i 1;'11/N L3 � OL2 �7 `- _ -- _ l OL/ 6 OL, OL3 r� 51ACET — I REFER TO I 71• ST RCC7 \ 3 .214 P RCITY L + 3 t216 ONGETO-ft — o ' 1708/232 = 61• STREET is PEE _:?vi1K 11• STR T I \ tJ 1 I � I • v \AC 1 50 AC.. .30 rr. .�^r /C+�eti� Vl.}:,) t I P.W. 1 IRf —• 1 14 z / 2/44 22 0 ( I1 00 AC OL7 QJ� F ' 1 • ..... �.�=... 1 t W AC ;ice t /ii� / D A l 1 1 OOL STATE HIGH AY 29 OIL. (r I 1 �� - 10110-�) I 1� YTI I \71 1 EXHIBIT B DETERMINATION OF PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT GIVEN A SINGLE LAND USE 1. 'DATE': December 5, 1995 `PROJECT NAME': River Oaks - IH35 Business Park Preliminary Plat 2. `GIVEN` acres of Intensity Level 1 acres of Intensity Level 2 acres of Intensity Level 3 acres of Intensity Level 4 21.26 acres of Intensity Level 5 acres of Intensity Level 6 21.26 TOTAL ACRES 3. ALLOWABLE DEMAND: INTENSITY WATER WASTEWATER TRANSPORTATION LEVEL Peak GPD Average GPD Peak Trip Ends 1 0 0` 0 2 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 5 233,010 68,032 3,721 6 0 0 0 4. TOTAL ALLOWABLE DEMAND: Maximum GPD Water Capacity: 233,010 Maximum GPD Wastewater Capacity: 68,032 Maximum Trip Ends: 3,721 5. PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT: (a) (b) (c) (d) POTENTIAL UNITS BY UTILITY MAXIMUM PER DEV DEVELOPMENT LAND USES WATER WASTEWATER TRANSPORTATION I UNITS I REGS I ALLOWED/UNIT Detached SF Large Lot 201 Average Lot 233 Zero Lot Line 233 Attached SF 358 Multifamily 441 Mobile Home 358 Lodging 1,214 Institutional 679,328 Church -with day care 756,525 -w/o day care 1,252,740 Medical Office 560,119 General Office 640,136 Retail, Mixed 358,476 Retail, Restaurant 149,365 Retail, Store 716,953 Employment Centers 640,136 Warehouse 4,087,888 Mini -Warehouse 58,252,400 235 272; 272 389 436 352 1.115 739,478 819,663 1,360,640 607,429 747,604 417,374 141,733 773,091 747,604 4,859,429 68,032,000 tl- 6,211 4,199 4,199 3,423 1,638 4,393 2.684 4,423,900 239,107 5,167,361 1,152,928 1,459,020 225,239 327,221 774.781 813,046 6,200.833 14,309,615 201 233 233 358 436 352 1115 679,328 239,107 1,252,740 560.119 640,136 225,239 141,733 716,953 640.136 4,087,888 14.309,615 --------------- 43 154 206 309 616 43 housing units 154 housing units 206 housing units 358 housing units 436 housing units 352 housing units 1,115 rooms 679,328 square feet 239,107 square feet 1,252,740 square feet 560,119 square feet 640,136 square feet 225,239 square feet 141,733 square feet 716,953 square feet 640,136 square feet 4,087,888 square feet 14,309,615 square feet along the rear lot line and a five -foot -wide Public Utility Easement located along the south side lot line of Lot 2, Block D, Parkview Estates Subdivision, as recorded in Cabinet G, Slides 39-41 of the Plat Records of Williamson County, Texas, and located at 102 Parque Vista Drive, and the City Secretary to attest thereto on behalf of the City of Georgetown. SECTION 3. This resolution shall be effective immediately upon adoption. RESOLVED this day of 1996. ATTEST: THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN: Sandra D. Lee City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: Marianne Landers Banks City Attorney By: Leo Wood Mayor Lot 2, Block D, Parkview Estates Resolution No. Page 2 of 2 Council meeting April 23, 1996 Item No. AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET 7,00 SUBJECT: Consideration of a Concept Plan of a 118.951 acre tract in the John Berry Survey, to be known as Pecan Branch Subdivision, located on County Road 152 and FM971 ITEM SUMMARY: The subject Concept Plan is for the development of a 390 unit single family residential subdivision to be constructed in three (3) phases (95.65 acres), a ten (10) acre church site and approximately 13 acres of park land adjacent to Pecan Branch. Pedernales Electric Cooperative shall provide electric service and Jonah Water Supply will provide water service. The City of Georgetown will provide wastewater to this site. FM971 is classified as a major arterial roadway and provides the primary access for this subdivision. The proposed street network consists of one (1) loop collector street accessing FM971 and a grid system of local streets. The street network has been redesigned in accordance with the technical issue listed in the staff report so that access to FM971 is limited to collector streets. One issue of concern is that more than one (1) of the MoKan (SH 130) routes being studied by TXDOT cross a portion of Phases One and Two. Should any one of these routes be built in the future, the layout and character of this subdivision would be significantly altered. TXDOT will hold public hearings to assist in its evaluation of the MoKan route alternatives extending through Georgetown in the first half of 1997 and expects to select the preferred route by December 1997. Access to the 13 acre park land site located between the proposed residential development and Pecan Branch is provided by two (2) access easements extending from the cul-de-sac streets. Access to the church lot is proposed to be taken from one (1) of the local streets which will provide a route from this proposed subdivision that does not require travel along FM971. The northern boundary of the proposed residential areas coincides with the 100-year flood plain which includes Pecan Branch. The applicant proposes to dedicate approximately 13 acres of park land to the City. Of the 13 acre total, the applicant has located 1.3 acres of usable park land outside of the 100-year flood plain in accordance with Section 42070 E.1. of the Subdivision Regulations and the technical issue noted in the staff report. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: None. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDED MOTION: At their regular meeting of April 2, 1996, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval of Pecan Branch Subdivision, provided the Technical Issues are addressed prior to City Council consideration. ATTACHMENTS: Staff report, attached exhibits and Concept Plan. Submitted By: EdwA J. Barry, AI -Director Division of Development Services Hildy L. rgl , AICP Chief Pla r CONCEPT PLAN OF A 118.951 ACRE TRACT IN THE JOHN BERRY SURVEY, TO BE KNOWN AS PECAN BRANCH SUBDIVISION, LOCATED ON COUNTY ROAD 152 AND FM971 OWNER/APPLICANT: Mr. Greg Hall 213 B 8th Street Georgetown, Texas 78628;, 930-5448 AGENT: Mr. James Kerby Parker -Kerby Development 9390 Research Boulevard #305 Austin, Texas 78759 512/345-3379 FAX: 794-0110 REQUEST: Concept Plan of 118.951 acres in the John Berry Survey, to be known as Pecan Branch Subdivision, and recorded in Document #9542329 of the Official Deed Records of Williamson County, Texas. Location: Located on County Road 152 and FM971. SEE EXHIBIT A Existing Site: Undeveloped land. Existing Zoning: This tract is located out of the City so zoning does not apply. Proposed Use: Church, single family residential lots and park land Surrounding Uses and Zoning: North: Undeveloped land (out of City) South: Undeveloped land (out of City) East: Undeveloped land (out of City) West: Undeveloped land and single family residential (out of City) Century Plan: The Century Plan -Development Plan designates this tract as Intensity Levels 2, 3 and 5. SEE EXHIBIT B The proposed development is within the allowable intensities for this acreage. Concept Plan - Pecan Branch April 15, 1996 CP 96-05 / File:PECANBR.CP Page 1 CM/WW Notification: The notification requirements have been completed. ANALYSIS: The subject Concept Plan is for the development of a 390 unit single family residential subdivision to be constructed in three (3) phases (95.65 acres) , a ten (10) acre church site and approximately 13 acres of park land adjacent to Pecan Branch. SEE EXHIBIT C Concept Plan - Pecan Branch CP 96-05 / File:PECANBR.CP CM/WW Pedernales Electric Cooperative shall provide electric service and Jonah Water Supply will provide water service. The City of Georgetown will provide wastewater to this site. There is an existing lift station located at the northeast corner of FM971 and County Road 152 on the ten (10) acre church lot. Until the Pecan Branch Phase 2 Interceptor and Pecan Branch Wastewater Treatment Plant are completed (projected for 1999), all wastewater flows from this development would be collected at the existing Crystal Knoll Lift Station on County Road 152. FM971 is classified as a major arterial roadway and provides the primary access for this subdivision. The proposed street network consists of one (1) loop collector street accessing FM971 and a grid system of local streets. While the Concept Plan shows several of the local streets intersecting FM971, Table 33030-B of the Subdivision Regulations prohibits local streets to intersect major arterial roadways. As noted in the Technical Issues section below, the street network will need to be redesigned so that access to FM971 is limited to collector streets. As shown in Exhibit C, access to the 13 acre park land site located between the proposed residential development and Pecan Branch is provided by several 50 foot wide access easements extending from the cul-de-sac streets. This layout is consistent with Section 42070 of the Subdivision Regulations which states that public access to public park land must be provided by at least 50 feet of street frontage. Access to the church lot is proposed to be taken from one (1) of the local streets which will provide a route from this proposed subdivision that does not require travel along FM971. One issue of concern is that more than one (1) of the MoKan April 15, 1996 Page 2 (SH130) routes being studied by TXDOT cross a portion of Phases One and Two. Should any one of these routes be built in the future, the layout and character of this subdivision would be significantly altered. TXDOT will hold public hearings to assist in its evaluation of the MoKan route alternatives extending through Georgetown in the' -first half of 1997 and expects to select the preferred route by December 1997. The northern boundary of the proposed residential areas coincides with the 100-year flood plain which includes Pecan Branch. The applicant proposes to dedicate approximately 13 acres of park land to the City. This acreage exceeds the amount prescribed by Section 42020 of the Subdivision Regulations which requires one (1) acre of park land for each 150 new dwelling units proposed. Given the 390 residences within the proposed Pecan Branch subdivision, only 2.6 acres of park land is required. Section 42070 E.1. also states that for areas in the 100-year flood plain which are not adjacent to one of the three (3) forks of the San Gabriel River such as the subject site, up to fifty (50) percent of the required acreage must be located outside of the 100-year flood plain. Thus, according to this requirement, 1.3 acres of park land must be located outside of the flood plain. As noted in the Technical Issues section, the applicant must identify this acreage of usable park land area on the Concept Plan. Technical Issues: The Subdivision Regulations require that the following technical issues are addressed prior to Planning and Zoning Commission consideration of this application. In order to assist the applicant, however, this application has been forwarded to the Planning and Zoning Commission prior to the completion of the technical issues. State Statute and the Subdivision Regulations require that the City Council take action on concept plans within 45 days of consideration by the Commission. Therefore, in order to meet this deadline, the Technical Issues must be addressed by May 3, or the application will be forwarded to the Council with a recommendation for denial. Alternatively, the applicant has the opportunity to request a delay to the City Council's consideration of the application in order to complete the technical issues. Concept Plan - Pecan Branch April 15, 1996 CP 96-05 / File:PECANBR.CP Page 3 CM/WW 1. The local street network must be redesigned to ensure that only collector or higher level streets intersect FM971. 2. Identify the proposed location of the 1.3 acres of park land located outside of the 100-year flood plain on the Concept Plan. STAFF RECONMENDATION: Approval of the Concept Plan of Pecan Branch Subdivision, provided the Technical Issues are addressed prior to City Council consideration. P & Z ACTION: Approval of the Concept Plan of Pecan Branch Subdivision, provided the Technical Issues are addressed prior to City Council consideration. Concept Plan - Pecan Branch CP 96-05 / File:PECANBR.CP CM/WW April 15, 1996 Page 4 _9 fl r � ; _ r •f� o ''n i C 'z N 1 j•�S-SS_ �� �x lbti�`10 .rZ r j el •8p � � ...r .6 Z 1�- r � 1 Council meeting April 23, 1996 Item No. U AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET SUBJECT: Consideration of a Final Plat of a 99.096 acre tract in the R. T. Jenkins, Isaac Jones, Abner Short, W. G. Wilkinson, and George Thompson Surveys, to be known as the Planned Unit Development of Sun City Georgetown, Phase 2, Neighborhood Ten. ITEM SUMMARY: The subject Final Plat is consistent.with the approved Preliminary Plat for Sun City Georgetown, Phase 2. All design and information requirements of the Subdivision Regulations have been met. Four (4) streets within Neighborhood Ten, Blazing Star Drive, Red Poppy Trail, Daisy Path and Lantana Drive, are proposed to intersect with Trail of the Flowers, which is in Neighborhood Nine. Trail of the Flowers is not constructed and it appears that these streets would require temporary cul-de-sacs. However, the applicant assured the City that Trail of the Flowers will be constructed prior to the streets in Neighborhood Ten, and therefore, temporary cul-de-sacs will not be necessary. The City is in the process of reviewing the construction plans for the public improvements of Neighborhood Ten. If approved, this Final Plat will not be recorded until the construction plans are approved and record copies are submitted to the City. t1- SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: None. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. COMMENTS: At its April 2, 1996, meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 6-0 to approve the Final Plat of the Planned Unit Development of Sun City Georgetown, Phase 2, Neighborhood Ten. RECOMMENDED MOTION: If this item is approved by the City Council, it will be consistent with the Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendation, unless stated otherwise. ATTACHMENTS: Staff report and plat. Submitted By. r^ Edward J. Barry, AICP - Director Division of Development Services Hildy L. Kingma, AIUF Chief Planner FINAL PLAT OF A 99.096 ACRE TRACT IN THE R. T. JENKINS, ISAAC JONES, ABNER SHORT, W.G. WILKINSON, AND GEORGE THOMPSON SURVEYS, TO BE KNOWN AS THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OF SUN CITY GEORGETOWN, PHASE 2, NEIGHBORHOOD TEN, LOCATED SOUTHEAST OF DEL WEBB BOULEVARD OWNERS/APPLICANT: Mr. Robert Eck II, P.E. ,y_ Director, Land Development Del Webb Development Company 203 South IH-35, Suite 100 Georgetown, Texas 78628 931-6900 FAX: 930-6776 AGENT: Mr. Scott Smiley, P.E. Turner, Collie & Braden, Inc. 5000 Plaza On The Lake, Suite 150 Austin, Texas 78746 329-5002 FAX: 329-0802 REQUEST: Final Plat of a 99.096 acre tract in the R. T. Jenkins, Isaac Jones, Abner Short, W . G . Wilkinson, and George Thompson, to be known as the Planned Unit Development of Sun City Georgetown, Phase 2, Neighborhood Ten as recorded in Volume 1898, Page 597 of the Official Deed Records of Williamson County, Texas. Existing Zoning: Currently this property is zoned A, Agricultural. A rezoning to RP, Residential Planned was approved on First Reading. Second Reading of the rezoning ordinance for the area of Neighborhood Ten will occur after the Final Plat is recorded. Proposed Use: 292 single family residential lots and four (4) open space tracts. HISTORY: The Preliminary Plat of Phase 2 was approved by the City Council on December 12, 1995. Final Plat - Sun City Georgetown, Phase 2, Neighborhood Ten #FP96-12/File:SCG_10.FP CM/CS April 18, 1996 Page 1 ANALYSIS: The subject Final Plat is consistent with the approved Preliminary Plat for Sun City Georgetown, Phase 2. All design and information requirements of the Subdivision Regulations have been met. SEE EXHIBIT C Four (4) streets within Neighborhood Ten, Blazing Star Drive, Red Poppy Trail, Daisy Path and Lantana Drive, are proposed to intersect with Trail of the Flowers, which is in Neighborhood Nine. Trail of the Flowers is not constructed and it appears that these streets would require temporary cul-de-sacs. However, the applicant assured the City that Trail of the Flowers will be constructed prior to the streets in Neighborhood Ten, and therefore, temporary cul-de-sacs will not be necessary. The City is in the process of reviewing the construction plans for the public improvements of Neighborhood Ten. If approved, this Final Plat will not be recorded until the construction plans are approved and record copies are submitted to the City. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of a Final Plat_ for the Planned Unit Development of Sun City Georgetown, Phase 2, Neighborhood Ten. P & Z ACTION: At its April 2, 1996, meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 6-0 to approve the Final Plat of the Planned Unit Development of Sun City Georgetown, Phase 2, Neighborhood Ten. Final Plat - Sun City Georgetown, Phase 2, Neighborhood Ten #FP96-12/File:SCG_10.FP CM/CS April 18, 1996 Page 2 J lJ \i Clrl Y GEORGETOW P14ASE 2 NEIGHBORHOOD TEN m x 0 EXHIBIT B DETERMINATION OF PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT GIVEN A MIXED LAND USE PROPOSAL 1. 'DATE': September 13, 1995 'PROJECT NAME': Sun City Georgetown - Revised Concept Plan (Second) 2. 'GIVEN': acres of Intensity Level 1 5314 acres of Intensity Level 2 acres of Intensity Level 3 acres of Intensity Level 4 acres of Intensity Level 5 acres of Intensity Level 6 5.314.00 TOTAL ACRES 3. ALLOWABLE DEMAND INTENSITY WATER WASTEWATER TRANSPORTATION LEVEL Peak GPO Average GPD Peak Trip Ends 1 0 0 0 2 12,753,600 3.454,100 21.256 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 4 TOTAL ALLOWABLE DEMAND: Maximum GPD Water Capacity: 12.753.600 Maximum GPD Wastewater Capacity: 3.454,100 Maximum Trip Ends: 21,256 5. EFFECTIVE ALLOWABLE SYSTEM INTENSITIES- GPD/Acre Water: 2.400 GPD/Acre Wastewater: 650 Trip Ends/Acre Traffic: 4 6 PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT BASED ON GIVEN MIX OF LAND USES (b) (a) TOTAL ALLOWABLE DEMAND (1) LAND USES I 'ACRES' WATER WASTEWATEF TRANSP Detached SF Large Lot Average Lot Zero Lot Line Attached SF Multifamily Mobile Home Lodging Institutional Church -with day care -w/o day care Medical Office General Office Retail, Mixed Retail, Restaurant Retail, Store Employment Centers Warehouse Mini -Warehouse Greenbelt 0 0 0 3,163.00 7,591,200 2,055,950 12,652 0 0 0 517 1.240,800 336,050 2,068 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29.15 69.960 18,948 117 0 0 0 0 0 0 80.75 193.800 52,488 323 16.00 38,400 10,400 64 1508.1 3.619,440 980,265 6,032 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0', 0 0 01 (c) (d) (e) (I) POTENTIAL UNITS BY UTILITY MAXIMUM PER DEV DEVELOPMENT WATER WASTEWATEF TRANSP I UNITS I REGS I ALLOWED/UNIT (2) 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 housing units 7,606 8,224 14,280 I 7,606 I 22,963 I 7,606 (lousing units 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 housing units 1,909 1,920 1,902 I 1.902 I 7,507 I 1.902 housing units 0 0 0 1 0 1 (5) I (5) housing units 0 0 0 1 0 1 I 0 housing units 0 0 0 1 0 I 0 rooms 204 206 139 I 138.644 I I 138,644 square feet 0 0 I 0 1 I 0 1 I I 0 square feet 0 0 0 1 0 1 I 0 square feet 466 469 100 I 100.093 I I 100.093 square feet 105 114 25 I 25,098 I I 25,098 square feet 5.568 6,014 365 I 365.202 I I 365,202 square feet 0 0 0 1 0 I I 0 square feet 0 0 0 1 0 I I 0 square feet 0 0 0 1 0 1 i 0 square feet 0 0 0 1 0 1 I 0 square feet 0 0 0 1 0 1 I 0 square feet Sub -Total 5,314.00 (units in this section should Road Right -of -Way be multiplied by 1000) TOTAL 5.314,00 EXHIBIT CIt i- mc r ' - ••a •° i' is ./ � 'j � _ _ s � 4.vS r •: Jn Or15 IMONi tl3NOv -_ _. _ _ - _ __-- - ... ..,-._• ••'� •� \ ITiMS COMBO .. 131y!`5 NOSenONI 30tl03: s _ � L5 a •. �nari kv .'� 41 IF CANOE IONSir, o OW =-� •'=:TAB .. ',O ` -`a 'i, .���.� p 'f Council meeting April 23, 1996 Item No. AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET SUBJECT: Consideration of a Final Plat of a Resubdivision of Logan Ranch, Section One, Lot 43, located at 221 Logan Ranch Road ITEM SUMMARY: The subject Final Plat proposes to subdivide Lot 43 into two (2) lots and construct one (1) residence on each lot. The Final Plat submittal conforms to the informational requirements of the Subdivision Regulations as well as the density and intensity requirements of the Century Plan - Development Plan. The east lot line of the proposed lots corresponds with the west one-half (25 feet) of the road easement for Logan Road. The Final Plat shows this 25 foot strip as a public right-of-way and utility easement. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: None. FINANCIAL IlVIPACT: None. RECOMMENDED MOTION: At their regular meeting of April 2, 1996, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approyal of a Final Plat for resubdivision of Logan Ranch Subdivision, Section One, Lot, 43. ATTACHMENTS: Staff report, attached exhibits and Final Plat. Submitted By: Edward J. Barry, k1CP - Director Division of Development Services , LJ)"', - -/-)�S, �-" Hildy L. ng a, AICP Chief Pi ner A SHORT FORM FINAL PLAT OF A RESUBDIVISON OF LOGAN RANCH, SECTION ONE, LOT 43, LOCATED AT 221 LOGAN ROAD OWNER/APPLICANT: Mr. Charles Normann Ms. Jeanne Normann 80104 Spyglass Circle Georgetown, TX 78628 y 863-5077 AGENT: Mr. Don Bizzell Steger and Bizzell Engineering, Inc. 1978 South Austin Avenue Georgetown, Texas 78626 863-4521 FAX 863-4523 REQUEST: Short Form Final Plat of a resubdivision of Logan Ranch Subdivision, Section One, Lot 43 as recorded in Cabinet E, Slides 7-12 of the Official Plat Records of Williamson County, Texas. FACTS:- Location: Located at 221 Logan Road. SEE EXHIBIT A Existing Site: Undeveloped lot. Existing Zoning: This tract is located out of the City so zoning does not apply. Proposed Use: Two (2) single family residential lots are proposed. Surrounding Uses and Zoning: North: South: East: West: Logan Ranch Subdivision (out of City) Logan Ranch Subdivision (out of City) Logan Ranch Subdivision (out of City) Unplatted agricultural land (out of City) Century Plan: The Century Plan -Development Plan designates this location as Intensity Level 2. SEE EXHIBIT B The proposed development is within the allowable limits for this acreage. Notification: The notification process has been completed. Short Form Final Plat - Logan Ranch, Sec. One, Lot 43 April 15, 1996 FP 96-08/File: LOGAN43.FP Page 1 CM:WW HISTORY: Logan Ranch Subdivision was platted prior to coming into the jurisdiction of the City. ANALYSIS: The subject Final Plat proposes to subdivide Lot 43 into two (2) lots and construct one (1) residence on each lot. SEE EXHIBIT C Each lot will be served by an on -site wastewater system and water will be provided by private wells. Electric service will be provided by the Pedernales Electric Cooperative. The Final Plat submittal conforms to the informational requirements of the Subdivision Regulations as well as the density and intensity requirements of the Century Plan - Development Plan. As shown in Exhibit C, the east lot line of the proposed lots corresponds with the west one-half (25 feet) of the road easement for Logan Road. The Final Plat shows this 25 foot strip as a public right-of-way and utility easement. STAFF RECONEVIENDATION: Approval of the Final Plat for resubdivision of Logan Ranch Subdivision, Section One, Lot 43. P & Z ACTION: Approval of the Final Plat for resubdivision of Logan Ranch Subdivision, Section One, Lot 43. Short Form Final Plat - Logan Ranch, Sec. One, Lot 43 FP 96-08/File: LOGAN43.FP CM:WW April 15, 1996 Page 2 EXHIBIT A r 2289/792 f l 120.0 .co ' .0 A, 1.0 JGNAN 102 AC) 1.0 Ac 24 23 26 27 / / TB Z S< 77 76 +r .c , o •� N-A 257FA'C". 74 I�t V 73 1 Y' '•2.52AC~ 72 •+'� 37 54A 346 33 \ .EJ 'R 71 1 R 35 girl 36 70 �t � 69 A 37 68A .688 f„ C 3B °Gp rj1 y.� 648 c t v .c r) 664 65 668 FIRST TEXAS DEVELOPMENT CORP 64 1852/307 ( le 2.00 AC I 41 19912 7 AC, 63 42 808RY G. STANTON 2239/960 32.32 AC. J R EMBREE e4 •mac+ 1596/912 0 5.03 AC 60 56 t 57 �,• v 45 \ S L" Ali � a P° sa 55 � Gpµ 1_ ``I C 59 LJ r )—t 4-1N= G °RI' .J ♦7 f ( v �J I 46 53-C t.)o.c ALµP r.w r. 52 rso 1w. -+ C, P >' SI O R F T 209 m 47 r r r+1 I r'y 50 r = t) n 48 ' / L 49 RtSItiO STAR ENTERPRISES 4 I 1 • , f 1017/608 v I 1 v 10.02 Ac. ti I 10 I T / 216 ate 2 0 161 -. - _ 97 22C 17a 313 1 , A,zz ai3 tgpl� ;` 90 32E 329 31� 131 132 126 1� I ` I �T E oP se • 327 :24 2ic �.•-`A� 3/E 126 I Saa 22Z 229 231 a w•MiI 3•7 oz 3'= = R S,I .:JF � .w 339 540 SaI 3I ( Iv 130A `� 77fi.l. ✓.v IT EXHIBIT B ' 11 DETERMINATION OF PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT GIVEN A SINGLE LAND USE 1. `DATE`: March 8, 1996 `PROJECT NAME`: Logan Ranch Section I, Lot 43 Resubdivision 2. 'GIVEN` acres of Intensity Level 1 5.03 acres of Intensity Level 2 acres of Intensity Level 3 acres of Intensity Level 4 acres of Intensity Level 5 acres of Intensity Level 6 5.03 TOTAL ACRES 3. ALLOWABLE DEMAND: INTENSITY WATER WASTEWATER TRANSPORTATION LEVEL Peak GPD Average GPD Peak Trip Ends 1 0 0 0 2 12,072 3,270 20 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 4. TOTAL ALLOWABLE DEMAND: Maximum GPD Water Capacity: 12,072 Maximum GPD Wastewater Capacity: 3,270 Maximum Trip Ends: 20 5. PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT: LAND USES Detached SF Large Lot Average Lot Zero Lot Line Attached SF Multifamily Mobile Home Lodging Institutional Church -with day care -w/o day care Medical Office General Office Retail, Mixed Retail, Restaurant Retail, Store Employment Centers Warehouse Mini -Warehouse -------------------------------- (a) POTENTIAL UNITS BY UTILITY WATER WASTEWATER TRANSPORTATION ------------------------------------------------------------- e� ---------- 10 .1 1_` 34 12 13 23 12 13 23 19 19 19 23 21 9 19 17 24 63 54 15 35,195 35,538 23,924 39,195 39.392 64,903 65,390 29,019 29,192 33.165 35,929 18,572 20,058 7,738 6,811 37,145 37.153 33,165 35.929 211,789 233„536 3,018,000 --------------------------------------- 3,269,500 1,293 27,944 6.235 7,890 1.218 1.770 4,190 4,397 33.533 77.385 --------------------------- (b) MAXIMUM UNITS -------------------- 10 12 12 19 91 17 15 23.924 1.293 27,944 6,235 7,890 1.218 1.770 4,190 4,397 33.533 77.385 ------------------ (c) (d) PER DEV DEVELOPMENT REGS I ----------------- I ----------------------------------------- ALLOWED/UNIT I 10 10 house units 37 I 12 housing units 49 I 12 housing units 73 I 19 housing units 144 I 9 housing units 17 housing units 15 rooms 23,924 square feet I 1,293 square feet 27,944 square feet 6,235 square feet 7.890 square feet 1.218 square feet 1,770 square feet 4.190 square feet 4.397 square feet 33,533 square feet -----------------I-------------------------------------- 77.385 square feet EXHIBIT C LOGAN RANCH, LOT 43 kn v ti A� i ti L' ti ,Z/g8/ 'M,oF,Z/B�N ��120/ ZPb,D2'�,�SOZN — Council meeting April 23, 1996 Item No. tt/ AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET SUBJECT: Consideration of a Final Plat of a 6.76 acre tract combining multiple tracts in the Cedar Oaks Subdivision, North Georgetown Addition and acreage in the Nicholas Porter Survey, to be known as Foster Square, located between Spring Street, Morrow Street, Austin Avenue, North Forest Street, IH35 and Old Lampasas Road ITEM SUMMARY: The subject Final Plat is for the development of a grocery store, parking and loading areas. The staff report notes that a public access easement, adjacent to at least one-half of the existing right-of-ways to the Time Auto Sales and Diamond Shamrock properties, respectively, must be shown on the Final Plat as well as prepared and recorded at the time Valley and Rock Streets are abandoned. The purpose of this procedure is to ensure that the owners of Time Auto Sales and Diamond Shamrock maintain the same access rights to these properties they currently possess. All of the technical issues noted in the staff report, including those described above, have been addressed. One issue of concern is the present level of traffic congestion along Austin Avenue in this area and the increased number of vehicle trips generated by a grocery store operation. The developer and the City should work together with TXDOT to determine the appropriate type(s) of traffic control adjacent to Albertson's and along Austin Avenue. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: None. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDED MOTION: At their regular meeting of April 2, 1996, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval of a Final Plat for Foster Square, provided the Technical Issues are addressed prior to City Council consideration. ATTACHMENTS: Staff report, attached exhibits and Final Plat. Submitted By: Edward J. Barry, Alb irector Division of Development Services )04 2 "6 Hildy LJner ingma, AICP Chief P A FINAL PLAT OF A 6.76 ACRE TRACT COMBINING MULTIPLE TRACTS IN THE CEDAR OAKS SUBDIVISION, NORTH GEORGETOWN ADDITION AND ACREAGE IN THE NICHOLAS PORTER SURVEY, TO BE KNOWN AS FOSTER SQUARE, LOCATED BETWEEN SPRING STREET, MORROW STREET, AUSTIN AVENUE, NORTH FOREST STREET, IR35 AND OLD LAMPASAS ROAD OWNERS/APPLICANTS: Albertson's Inc. c/o Callaway Architects 17738 Preston Road, Suite 125 Dallas, Texas 75252 214/732-6085 FAX: 214/732-8058 Bielss Living Trust; Albert C. and Bernice I. Bielss Mrs. Doris Foster Kendall Ray Henderson Lurlene Lucille Henderson Ernest H. and Nannie Laverne Johnson, Sr. Ramiro and Esther Mireles AGENT: Mr. Gary Eli Jones Huffcut & Associates 3305 Steck Avenue, Suite 305 Austin, Texas 78757 454-8711 FAX: 459-8867 REQUEST: Final Plat of a 6.76 acre tract, combining multiple tracts in the Cedar Oaks Subdivision, North Georgetown Addition and acreage in the Nicholas Porter Survey, to be known as Foster Square, as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 255, Cabinet A, Slide 249 and Cabinet J, Slide 331, of the Official Plat Records of Williamson County, Texas, and as recorded in Volume 1972, Page 206, Volume 1255, Page 639, Volume 443, Page 66, and Volume 849, Page 254 of the Official Deed Records of Williamson County, Texas. Existing Zoning: C-2A, Commercial First Height. Proposed Use: Albertson's Food Store. HISTORY: The Preliminary Plat with requested variances to allow Areas 2 Final Plat - Foster Square April 15, 1996 FP 96-05/File: FOSTER.FP Page 1 CM:WW and 3 to remain smaller than the minimum lot size and to waive the 20 foot rear setback for Areas 2 and 3, was approved by City Council in March 1996. SEE EXHIBIT C ANALYSIS: The subject Final Plat is for the development of a grocery store, parking and loading areas. SEE EXHIBIT D Foster Square will use City of Georgetown water, wastewater and electric services. One change between the Preliminary Plat and the Final Plat submittals concerns the access easements adjacent to the proposed Valley and Rock Street abandonments which impacts the Diamond Shamrock and Time Auto Sales property owners. While the Preliminary Plat showed a 25 foot access easement adjacent to the Time Auto Sales and a 30 foot access easement adjacent to Diamond Shamrock properties, the Final Plat does not show these described easements. As noted in the Technical Issues section, a public access easement, equal to at least one- half of each adjacent right-of-way, must be shown on the Final Plat as well as prepared and recorded at the time Valley and Rock Streets are abandogpd. This procedure will ensure that the owners of Diamond Shamrock and Time Auto Sales, as well as the general public, maintain the same access rights to these properties they currently possess. One issue of concern is the present level of traffic congestion along Austin Avenue in this area and the increased number of vehicle trips generated by a grocery store operation. The developer and the City should work together with TXDOT to determine the appropriate type(s) of traffic control adjacent to Albertson's and along Austin Avenue. Technical Issues: The Subdivision Regulations require that the following technical issues are addressed prior to Planning and Zoning Commission consideration of this application. In order to assist the applicant, however, this application has been forwarded to the Planning and Zoning Commission prior to the completion of the technical issues. State Statute and the Subdivision Regulations require that the City Council take action on plats within 30 days of consideration by the Commission. Therefore, in order to meet this deadline, the Technical Issues must be addressed by Final Plat - Foster Square April 15, 1996 FP 96-05/File: FOSTER.FP Page 2 CM:WW April 12, or the application will be forwarded to the Council with a recommendation for denial. Alternatively, the applicant has the opportunity to request a delay to the City Council's consideration of the application in order to complete the technical issues. 1. Add the proposed 25 foot public access easement adjacent to the Time Auto Sales and a 30 foot public access easement adjacent to Diamond Shamrock properties to the Final Plat. In addition, these public access easements must be prepared and recorded by separate instrument at the time Valley and Rock Streets are abandoned. 2. Show the 15 foot PUE required within the Rock Street abandonment extending between Spring and Morrow Street which is centered on and covers the existing electric line. 3. Show the 10 (ten) foot PUE required within the Rock Street abandonment extending between Spring and Morrow Street which is centered on and covers the existing water line. Prior to Filing: Before any portion of this plat can be recorded, the following action must occur: Final Plat - Foster Square FP 96-05/File: FOSTERTP CM:WW 1. A copy of the water pollution abatement plan approved by TNRCC must be received before the Final Plat can be recorded. 2. Electric service requirements shall be coordinated through John Thomas, Electric Superintendent at 930-3555, prior to any construction. If the applicant has the capability, this project can be expedited by providing an AutoCAD® "DWG" file showing lot lines, right-of-way lines, proposed water and wastewater lines and a plan view including the proposed service locations to the City. The City will design the underground electrical system and provide the developer this design on an AutoCade file and a hard copy. The electric system design shall be incorporated into the construction plans for this development. A copy of the AutoCAD® file for the subdivision may be submitted to Don Rundell, Manager of Systems Engineering, at the Community Owned Utilities Division. The City will design the facilities and return the design to you added to the AutoCAD® file provided by you. April 15, 1996 Page 3 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the Final Plat for Foster Square, provided the Technical Issues are addressed prior to City Council consideration. P & Z ACTION: Approval of the Final Plat for Foster Square, provided the Technical Issues are addressed prior to City Council consideration. Final Plat - Foster Square FP 96-05/File: FOSTER.FP CM:WW April 15, 1996 Page 4 EXHIBIT A FOSTER SQUARE 9 23 �h �1 1 A 1—--1— ... I /1 ,7 /1 </4 I L_,� MS O,Q F MORROW STREET q M 2�3 9 'S O� I I � g 3 2 I I < 3 J i i I I SPR I I 6 7 g w w 5 6 i c I 3 I 2 I z a 3 6 7 e s 6 MORROW STREF-T\ EXHIBIT B DETERMINATION OF PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT GIVEN A SINGLE LAND USE 1. 'DATE': March 8, 1996 'PROJECT NAME': Foster Square Final Plat 2. 'GIVEN' acres of Intensity Level 1 acres of Intensity Level 2 acres of Intensity Level 3 acres of Intensity Level 4 acres of Intensity Level 5 7.51 acres of Intensity Level 6 7.51 TOTAL ACRES 3. ALLOWABLE DEMAND: INTENSITY WATER WASTEWATER TRANSPORTATION LEVEL Peak GPD Average GPD Peak Trip Ends 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 6 158,402 45,043 3,003 4. TOTAL ALLOWABLE DEMAND: Maximum GPD Water Capacity: 158,402 Maximum GPD Wastewater Capacity: 45,043 Maximum Trip Ends: 3,003 5. PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT: LAND USES Detached SF Large Lot Average Lot Zero Lot Line Attached SF Multifamily Mobile Home Lodging Institutional Church -with day care -w/o day care Medical Office General Office Retail, Mixed Retail, Restaurant Retail Store Employment Centers Warehouse Mini -Warehouse (a) (b) POTENTIAL UNITS BY UTILITY MAXIMUM WATER WASTEWATER -- ----------------------------------------------------- TRANSPORTATION I -------------- -------------------- UNITS 137 1-56 5,013 137 159 180 3,389 I 159 159 180 3,389 I 159 244 257 2,763 I 244 300 289 1.322 I 289 244 233 3,545 I 233 825 738 2,167 I 738 461.813 489,600 3.570.606 1 461,813 514,292 542,689 I 192,987 I 192,987 851.623 900,864 4,170.667 I 851.623 380,774 402.171 930,548 I 380.774 435,170 494,980 1,177.600 I 435,170 243,695 276.339 181,794 I 181.794 101,540 93,840 264,1061 93,840 487,391 51.1,855 625,339 487 391 435,170 494,980 656,22.4I 435,170 2,778,981 3,217.371 5,004.800 I 2 , 7 78,981 39,600,480 ---- ---- --------------------------------------------------------------- 45,043.200 11,549,538 -------------------- 1 1.549,538 (c) (d) PER DEV DEVELOPMENT REGS I -----------------I -------------------------------------- ALLOWED/UNIT I 15 I 15 housing units 55 I 55 housing units 73 I 73 housing units 109 I 244 housing units 216 ( 216 housing units 233 housing units 738 rooms 461,813 square feet I 192,987 square feet 851,623 square feet 380,774 square feet 435,170 square feet 181,794 square feet 93,840 square feel 487,391 square feet 435,170 square feet 2,778,981 square feet -----------------I-------------------------------------- 11,549,538 square feel EXHIBIT C �— — -- — r- - -- j— - AREA I i IFkANrJI-I 0.240 AC. 1NTERST. /' �. 692/ V %. LOT 4 LOT 3 LOT � I L.T i 0998. p ��.. try ti'� 1vEST ORC.ETOv.N �EVELOPNEN) = j �`� Z "� �6`. 849/254 9 �T-, .9• ���1 r5 1.248 AC I I I 20 I LOT 5 I v 15, 0.2440 A(,'. -- ' -- — - - L- ---i— — SCALE 1 ' 100 11 �� �� .'r.'r;''. _ C7 SPRING STREET 60 ' R. O. W. C3' J 32.94 4" -N i 4$ ml �O RES BD:LajliM' Jf A Q- o V! NcXi77r c;EORi ETciww a&D ii,)ry CAB {J, :L j 7 0.2E+64 ACRE I T, r L i BLOCK 24s_ i Z �'r 12 ACRES � -O 5 10 � � l (PLAT CAB A. SL. 255/-, 3 1 (KX. 4.46, PG. 277) CEDAR OAKS SUB-DIVJS!0ry _ r,E — t,:, . 4j r<OQ (TO BE ABANDON&) CAB. A. SL. 255 pc y n tpjp 01 24g "a �aE A Sy tVT�6 �1 0.5893 ACRE AREA 1 LOT 72 a -�C'e k_ e �o nT ti 6.488 AC. t ,Bi-0,' r. S�. D� / BC UCX 24 - J -1 y 8. i 7' y t lR� ' ����J �Jro '-1�'r'rj } } ,e,rx�7 ''`ca - }�,t7 f'.y'z..'�.C�. 't 1. gyp... .Lr6.r�-i`.i•P • 1 ! . r '� .�" / C5 2 I I _-sc t :f:�- th \ Q I '-�.., L:J• 4 LOT •'J 252E ACC \ V SI BLOGri 25a / COA 16 c'pTi;7 LO �e s :Or y �e - a ,o' e� e� :_� 1. y rr,^, IASKI \ \ E' 1 I w O v=, vl L 1 �_ i' 174.67' I ',V. INVEST - 1 � ,n ( ) ` N q•5 1 IS /644 J, (' 16 I 1SoCR£' Irr LASLUCAfF TO (P ABANDONED) A, S! 255) t 8'39" / AC I 1 _ 3 += '•'~:'••HNEID-R Ec WiF ' y 11 } ClC!-liAF. OAKS SUE D�NSIOti @ ri EDWIt L; c EULA CORP THEO LU, 2T I CAB. A. 5':. 2`.5 1 AN A LOU SCH jlC nER j J 255/639 253 A - LOT 1221 �� BLOCA er o V 2;137 P 284 C; r N• C 33 AC (v ? 1 1 �� r� :i %.' O N 1 r 100Z 1. CW II Q 2W o SQEOS ACuf_ �G 4.:Y;. {1 z zAREA 2 BL 0.315 AC. -1 -- 56.1 94�' ��, � 6r ----'•.� 137 88' Ise. N 8� _ia•' I. .30(C6) 1(� r� 8T-i(i -6' c N .27'28'08' F fJ _ v l _MORROW STREET 60' R.0. W. _ ... -_-- ---- -- i--- ----IN TER�•t T1rlN -- -- --' - - - - -- —1. , E (SIT D. FOSTER SQUARE 30N AND NM 04 : \4 ROBINSON 66 D.R. Ir C.) _ -E DETAIL A 9RPO.RATION 639 D.R. Jr C-) O� r • v.y,� C S S87�59'31 "W --' 50.00' 4 0 LOT I BLOCK A �'�'`h CRES 0.2466 ACRE �� ` r WEST GEORGPNA"DOPMENr CO. SEE DETAIL B MAW VOL 649, PG. 264 — OLD LAMPASAS ROAD (SO' RIGHT -OF -NA}) % n iu Jam_ S87' 1'o.3'w 91.96' SPRING STREET N87;38'54 G (50' RfCHT-OF-WAY CAB A. SL NST38.54 f 174.62' -�. 5 -6 - 4. % 2-5 / i . ' t R� Of' COr / !A. ? g c-i� N8 7150 5E35.24 �tS ��%��'• � �.�v,utrumi_1 k, J POAyr OF EWDYMWG , r = J56.wE J4 �'•� /; LOT 1 N BLOCK B ; N� / 6. 473P ACRES 96 06' ti L - - _i0' / -- SITJZbYY 4"44' b j N �/. - 33' Adis umM+r aTa'iTt ,wee .' - "eT amt w me• l j� �Q' ass ttisalo rT _ W87791'�'E 1—T — veTaGTTi �xoe j r \30, 04 n NRT77 G6Y .3�0.N' 13' P.LLE 1 + V `I 14- k0275'30�j 69.77' k IR a ;nlf i �a RI Y 3 $' to I1 a!n', N89W'.39"W 174.6T o� ^- dt ^ ' rrrm e. er�r>� sac Mere mo '}- �i .-A -T -T-r��" j fF� Bi- OCK 22 N�$ ,�tI I `�!'�; fOI LOT 6 I LOT 7 t cp cn LOT 5 -tea `Y_ - +, _ »>_70' 6 .94' 137.88 67*JO'26'W 183.81 S87Z8'080W S8779 27"W MORROW STREET (BO' RTCHT-OF-1fAY CAB. A. SL 249; Council meeting April 23, 1996 Item No. AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET SUBJECT: Consideration of a Final Plat of River Oaks IH35 Business Park, a Resubdivision of River Oaks of Georgetown Office Park, located on the East IH35 Frontage Road north of SH29 ITEM SUMMARY: The subject Final Plat is for ten (10) developable, commercial lots and one (1) park land lot. In the Preliminary Plat submittal, the applicant proposed to dedicate 4.66 acres of park land in exchange for the ability to transfer the impervious cover allowances from that acreage to the developable lots. This results in an increase from 70 percent impervious cover per lot to 90 percent impervious cover. At their January 11, 1996 meeting, the consensus of the Parks and Recreation Board was to accept the 4.66 acre park land dedication along the San Gabriel River in exchange for higher density (90 percent impervious cover) development. The Final Plat submittal conforms to the informational requirements of the Subdivision Regulations as well as the density and intensity requirements of the Century Plan - Development Plan. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: None. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDED MOTION: At their regular meeting of April 2, 1996, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval of a Final Plat of River Oaks IH35 Business Park. ATTACHMENTS: Staff report, attached exhibits and Final Plat. Submitted By: EdwarS J. Barry, AI - birector Division of Development Services ii)4k, - Hildy ener AICP Chief A FINAL PLAT OF RIVER OAKS IH35 BUSINESS PARK, A RESUBDIVISION OF RIVER OAKS OF GEORGETOWN OFFICE PARK, LOCATED ON THE EAST IH35 FRONTAGE ROAD NORTH OF SH29 OWNER: Mr. Steven C . Stiles 1994 Land Fund II - Dallas 1, L.P. 2714 Bee Caves Road Austin, Texas 78746 328-3966 FAX: 328-3972 AGENT: Mr. Robert Gaylor 3105 Indian Mound Georgetown, Texas 78628 863-7042 FAX: 863-7042 REQUEST: Final Plat of River Oaks IH35 Business Park, a resubdivision of Riveroaks of Georgetown Office Park, as recorded in Cabinet H, Slides 260-261 of the Official Plat Records of Williamson County, Texas. Existing Zoning: C-2A, Commercial First Height, Restricted. Proposed Use: Mixed commercial. HISTORY: The Preliminary Plat with a requested variance to allow the River Oaks Cove cul-de-sac to be 750 feet long, was approved by City Council in January 1996. SEE EXHIBIT C ANALYSIS: The subject Final Plat is for ten (10) developable, commercial lots and one (1) park land lot. SEE EXHIBIT D This subdivision will use City of Georgetown water, wastewater and electric services. In the Preliminary Plat submittal, the applicant proposed to dedicate 4.66 acres of park land in exchange for the ability to transfer the impervious cover allowances from that acreage to the developable lots. This results in an increase from 70 percent impervious cover per lot to 90 percent impervious cover. At their January 11, 1996 meeting, the consensus of the Parks and Recreation Board was to accept the 4.66 acre park River Oaks IH35 Business Park Resubdivision PP-96-03/File:RV OK35BP.RSB CM:HK April 15, 1996 Page 1 land dedication along the San Gabriel River in exchange for higher density (90 percent impervious cover) development. The Final Plat submittal conforms to the informational requirements of the Subdivision Regulations as well as the density and intensity requirements of the Century Plan - Development Plan. Prior to Filing: Before any portion of this plat can be recorded, the following actions must occur: 1. The existing plat for Riveroaks of Georgetown Office Park must be vacated at the same time the first final plat on the subject property is recorded. 2. A copy of the water pollution abatement plan approved by TNRCC must be received before the Final Plat can be recorded. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the Final Plat of River Oaks IH35 Business Park. P & Z ACTION: Approval of the Final Pit of River Oaks IH35 Business Park. River Oaks IH35 Business Park Resubdivision PP-96-03 /File: RV OK35 BP.RSB CM:HK April 15, 1996 Page 2 Council meeting date: 4-23-96 AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET Item No. SUBJECT Development Agreement Concerning Platting of Foster Square (Albertson's) ITEM SUMMARY Albertson's is currently proposing development on property to the west of Austin Avenue adjacent to the new 1-35 frontage road. Albertson's must close on the property prior to May 31, 1996, when its options on the property expire. Albertson's was recently advised by the TNRCC that its WPAP application would not be completely processed for 90 days. As a part of the City's final platting requirements, Albertson's must produce a copy of their approved WPAP. Since the WPAP will not be available until after the options expire, it is necessary for Albertson's to request a development agreement from the City allowing the platting of the property in order for Albertson's to close with a legal lot. The agreement allows up to one year to get the WPAP completed. Otherwise, the City's approval of the plat may be revoked at the discretion of the Council. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS FINANCIAL IMPACT CITY ATTORNEY ATTACHMENTS Proposed Development Agreement _ Submitted By: Marianne Landers Banks, City Attorney THE STATE OF TEXAS ) DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT CONCERNING PLATTING OF COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON ) FOSTER SQUARE (ALBERTSON'S� CITY OF GEORGETOWN ) WHEREAS, Albertson's, Inc., a Delaware Corporation (hereinafter "Albertson's") is the owner of that certain tract of land in Georgetown, Williamson County, Texas, more fully described on Exhibit "A", which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (hereinafter "property"); WHEREAS, the property is being developed in accordance with the development requirements of the City of Georgetown (hereinafter "City"); WHEREAS, Albertson's is in the process of obtaining approval by the Texas National Resource Conservation Commission (hereinafter "TNRCC") of a Water Pollution Abatement Plan (hereinafter "WPAP") for the project (as defined in Section 1 below) due to the project's location on the recharge zone of the Edwards Aquifer; WHEREAS, Albertson's is in the process of obtaining the approval of the City to Albertson's Construction Plans for the project; WHEREAS, Albertson's is in the process of obtaining the approval of the City to the plat of the property as Foster Square; WHEREAS, Albertson's wishes to purchase the property and plat the property as Foster Square prior to the final approval of the WPAP by the TNRCC and the final approval of the City of the Construction Plans; WHEREAS, the City and Albertson's have agreed that the development requirements of the City substantially advance a legitimate interest of the City; WHEREAS, the City has adopted a development agreement policy (Resolution #940125E), which allows for the deferral of requirements, upon approval by the City Council; WHEREAS, the City and Albertson's desire to set forth these agreements in writing; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the agreements set forth herein, the City and Albertson's hereby enter into this Development Agreement Concerning Platting of Foster Square (hereinafter "Agreement") and agree as follows: Development Agreement Concerning Platting of Foster Square (Albertson's) Page 1 of 6 d:\contract\albertsn\041796. agt 1. The Project. Albertson's is planning and developing a supermarket facility (hereinafter "the project") on the property. 2. Agreement. Provided Albertson's satisfies all other criteria and requirements for platting of the property, the City hereby consents to and shall allow the filing of record of the final plat of Foster Square (hereinafter "plat") prior to the approval of the WPAP by the TNRCC and prior to the City's approval of the Construction Plans, subject to the following conditions: a. If upon the one (1) year anniversary of this Agreement the TNRCC (or any subsequent governmental authority authorized to approve the WPAP) has disapproved the WPAP and an alternate WPAP is not at that time pending before the TNRCC or before any governmental authority subsequently authorized to consider the WPAP in whole or in part, the City may, upon fifteen (15) days prior written notice to Albertson's, declare, at the City's option and in its sole discretion, the plat void; provided, however, that if within such fifteen (15) day notice period the WPAP is approved the City shall not declare the plat void for lack of WPAP approval; and b. If upon the one (1) year anniversary of this Agreement the City (or any subsequent governmental authority authorized to approve the Constructions Plans) has disapproved the Construction Plans and alternate Construction Plans are not at that time pending before the City or before any governmental authority subsequently authorized to consider the Construction Plans in whole or in part, the City may, upon fifteen (15) days prior written notice to Albertson's, declare, at the City's option and in its sole discretion, the plat void; provided, however, that if within such fifteen (15) day notice period the Construction Plans are approved the City shall not declare the plat void for lack of Construction Plan approval; and C. If the plat is declared void pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement, Albertson's may subsequent thereto make new application to the City for approval of the plat in conformity with all City requirements at that time. 3. Utility Service. Albertson's agrees that all utility service (including electric, water and wastewater but excluding gas, telephone and cable) to be provided to the property shall be obtained from the City if such City service is available to the site. If utility capacity is available, the City agrees to use all reasonable efforts to make utility service available to the property upon request for service by Albertson's according to established City utility service policies. Development Agreement Concerning Platting of Foster Square (Albertson's) Page 2 of 6 d:\contract\albertsn\041796. agt 4. Violation of this Agreement. In the event that Albertson's or its successors or assigns fail to abide by the terms of this Agreement, a copy of this Agreement and evidence of violation of this Agreement shall be sufficient evidence and confession of judgment at an injunction hearing, absent a valid defense by Albertson's to a violation. Albertson's further understands that there is a criminal penalty for violation of any City ordinance, and that such violations are punishable by a fine for each day that such violation exists, to the maximum extent allowed by law. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the disapproval of the WPAP, the disapproval of the Construction Plans, and/or the declaration of the plat as void shall not constitute a default by Albertson's of this Agreement. 5. Purchase and Development of the Proiect. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, Albertson's shall have no affirmative obligation to develop the project or purchase the property, and Albertson's makes no representations or warranties as to its intent or ability to purchase the property or develop the project. 6. Notices. a. All notices given pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be given by personal delivery, by United States mail or by United States express mail or other established express delivery service (such as Federal Express), postage or delivery charge prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the person and address designated below or, in the absence of such designation, to the person and address shown on the then current real property tax rolls of the county in which the project is located. All notices to City or Albertson's shall be sent to the person and address set forth below: City: City of Georgetown City Attorney P.O. Box 409 Georgetown, Texas 78627 Albertson's: Albertson's, Inc. 250 Parkcenter Blvd. Box 20 Boise, Idaho 83726 Attention: Legal Department The person and address to which notices are to be given may be changed at any time by any party upon written notice to the other parties. All notices given pursuant to this Agreement shall be deemed given upon receipt. Development Agreement Concerning Platting of Foster Square (Albertson's) Page 3 of 6 d Acontract\albertsn\041796.agt (b) For the purpose of this Agreement, the term "receipt" shall mean the earlier of any of the following: (i) the date of delivery of the notice or other document to the address specified pursuant to subparagraph (a) above as shown on the return receipt, (ii) the date of actual receipt of the notice or other document by the person or entity specified pursuant to subparagraph (a) above, or (iii) in the case of refusal to accept delivery or inability to deliver the notice or other document, the earlier of (A) the date of the attempted delivery or refusal to accept delivery, (B) the date of the postmark on the return receipt, or (C) the date of receipt of notice of refusal or notice of nondelivery by the sending party. 7. Miscellaneous Provisions. a. Actions Performable. The City and Albertson's agree that all actions to -be performed under this agreement are performable solely in Williamson. County, Texas. b. Governing Law. The City and Albertson's agree that this agreement has been made under the laws of the State of Texas in effect on this date, and that any interpretation of this agreement at a future date shall be made under the laws of the State of Texas. C. Severability. If a provision hereof shall be finally declared void or illegal by any court or administrative agency having jurisdiction, the entire agreement shall not be void; but the remaining provisions shall continue in effect as nearly as possible in accordance with the original intent of the parties. d. Complete Agreement. This agreement represents a complete agreement of the parties and supersedes all prior written and oral matters related to this agreement. Any amendment to this agreement must be in writing and signed by all parties. e. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which shall constitute a single instrument, and shall be effective upon execution of one or more such counterparts by each of the parties hereto. Development Agreement Concerning Platting of Foster Square (Albertson's) Page 4 of 6 d Acontract\alberts n\041796. agt SIGNED this of . 1996. CITY OF GEORGETOWN: M Leo Wood, Mayor Attest: Sandra D. Lee, City Secretary Approved as to form: Marianne Landers Banks City Attorney STATE OF TEXAS ) COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON ) ALBERTSON'S, INC. in William H. Arnold Vice President, Real Estate Law CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGMENT BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared Leo Wood, Mayor of the City of Georgetown, a Texas Municipal Corporation, on behalf of said municipality, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed, as the act and deed of said municipality, and in the capacity therein stated. 1996. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the day of April, Notary Public, State of Texas Development Agreement Concerning Platting of Foster Square (Albertson's) Page 5 of 6 d:\contract\aThertsn\041796.agt STATE OF IDAHO ) CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT COUNTY OF ADA ) On this day of , 1996, before, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared William H. Arnold, to me known to be the Vice President, Real Estate Law, of Albertson's, Inc., the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that the said instrument is the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said document. WITNESS MY HAND and official seal hereto affixed the day, month and year in this certificate first above written. My commission expires: Notary Public in and for the State of Idaho ' at Idaho Council Meeting Date: 04/23/96 Item No. A Iq AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET SUBJECT A resolution designating April 1996 as Fair Housing Month in Georgetown. ITEM SUMMARY Each year, April is designated at the national, state, and local levels as "Fair Housing Month". As part of the City's commitment as a recipient of Texas Community Development Program funds, we are requested to annually affirm the City's support of fair housing for its residents. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS None FINANCIAL IMPACT None COMMENTS None ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution tley Sappington, Director of Community Services RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, DESIGNATING THE MONTH OF APRIL 1996 AS FAIR HOUSING MONTH IN THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN. WHEREAS,the Department of Housing and Urban Development has initiated the sponsorship of activities during the month of April 1996, designed to reinforce the Department's commitment to the concept of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity; and, WHEREAS, the City of Georgetown affirmatively supports federal objectives related to Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this resolution are hereby found and declared to be true and correct, and are incorporated by reference herein and expressly made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim. The City Council hereby finds that this resolution implements Housing Policy 1 of the Century Plan - Policy Plan Element, which states: "The City will work with builders, developers, and property owners to provide safe and adequate housing opportunities for al household types" and further finds that the adoption of this resolution is not inconsistent or in conflict with any other Century Plan Policies, as required by Section 2.03 o the administrative chapter of the Policy Plan. SECTION 2. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign and the City Secretary to attest thereto this resolution declaring the month of April 1996 as Fair Housing Month in the City of Georgetown, and urging all local officials and public and private organizations to support the achievement of fair housing. SECTION 3. This resolution shall be effective immediately upon adoption. RESOLVED this 23rd day of April, 1996. Attest: Sandra D. Lee City Secretary Approved as to form. - Marianne Landers Banks City Attorney Resolution No. Fair Housing Month Page 1 of 1 THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN- By: Leo Wood Mayor :R48 Council Meeting Date: April 23, 1996 Item No. AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET SUBJECT Approval of Resolution and Statewide Transportation Enhancement Program Application to Texas Department of Transportation for Hike/Bike Trails along the South San Gabriel River, with the City of Georgetown committing 20 % of the cost of the program with 80 % of the cost from the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) ITEM SUMMARY The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) is calling for nominations for the Statewide Transportation Enhancement Program by May 1, 1996. The program is provided for by the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA). The program is an 80/20 match with the City of Georgetown coming up with 20 % for the project with all cost overruns to be supplied by the City of Georgetown. This is not a grant program; this is a federal reimbursement program administered by TxDOT. The alternate form of transportation (Hike/Bike Trail) will proceed along the South San Gabriel River following Interstate 35 from Chautauqua Park to State Highway 29 to George Washington Carver Elementary to Georgetown Hospital to the United States Post Office next to State Highway 2243 (Leander Road). SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS None FINANCIAL IMPACT Total estimated cost of the project is $1.4 million with the City committed to paying $280,000 which is 20 % of the total project. ISTEA does not allow in -kind labor match. COMMENTS The Facilities for Pedestrians and Bicycles (Hike/Bike Trails) must meet the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) design standards. These standards add to the project cost in that the minimum trail width is 12 feet wide. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution 2. Map of area for alternative form of transportation Submitted by: Rand Morrow Director of Parks an Y � d Recreation RESOLUTION NO. A. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ACT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN IN DEALING WITH THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF PARTICIPATING IN THE INTERMODAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION EFFICIENCY ACT OF 1991; CERTIFYING THAT THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN IS ELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE ASSISTANCE UNDER SUCH PROGRAM; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) has worked closely with the Federal Highway Administration to establish guidelines that offer a unique opportunity for the department to work in partnership with other state agencies, local government and other interested parties to sponsor enhancement projects. Interpretation of intent to be made to provide bicycle and pedestrian facilities as an alternate form of transportation in the City of Georgetown; and, WHEREAS, the City of Georgetown is fully eligible to receive assistance under this program and is committed to providing at least 20% of the total project cost. The 20% administration cost is to cover applicable fees including project administration, plans, specifications, and estimates in the total project cost; and, WHEREAS, documentary evidence shows public support for the project through the Century Plan - Parks and Recreation Function Plan and a 1996 Parks and Recreation Survey; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Georgetown is desirous of authorizing its administrative staff to represent and act for the City in dealing with the Texas Department of Transportation concerning this program; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Georgetown recommends that the Texas Department of Transportation consider this project for funding; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this resolution are hereby found and declared to be true and correct, and are incorporated by reference herein and expressly made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim. The City Council hereby finds that this resolution implements Recreation and Cultural Affairs Policy 2 of the Century Plan - Policy Plan Element, which states, "the City will assist in providing all its citizens the opportunity to participate in recreational and cultural programs"; and further finds that the adoption of this resolution is not Page 1 of 2 Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 Resolution Title No. inconsistent or in conflict with any other Century Plan Policies, as required by Section 2.03 of the Administrative Chapter of the Policy Plan. SECTION 2. The City Council hereby certifies that the City of Georgetown is eligible to receive assistance under this program with the Texas Department of Transportation for the purpose of participating in the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991. SECTION 3. The City Council hereby designates its Director of Finance and Administration as the official authorized to serve as the City's fiscal officer to receive federal funds for the purpose of this program. SECTION 4. The City Council hereby authorizes the City officials herein designated to make application to Texas Department of Transportation concerning the construction of Hike/Bike Trails along the South San Gabriel River Corridors Development as an alternate way of transportation in the City of Georgetown from Chautauqua Park to George Washington Carver Elementary to Georgetown Hospital to the United States Post Office on State Highway 2243 (Leander Road). SECTION 5. This resolution shall be effective immediately upon adoption. RESOLVED this day of ATTEST: Sandra D. Lee By: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: Marianne Landers Banks City Attorney Page 2 of 2 Intertnodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 Resolution Title No. 1996. THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN: Leo Wood Mayor J Q 1�1"1 iV1_ I /ah�� X 6t OL5 OL3 1,417Ac.) OL4 w REFER TO R ER TO 3 1214 i� 3 1216 ITY OF 0 EORGETOWN �•\ Z 17,08/232 0 (36.49 AC.) r It I I! 9 65 AC. .� /v i . Al (3)II q i/ t7-I Vf�r,J `i` coI I r I.- e` u r r-S, Ir• r�l\ rl Sj . L1 v IJIVIv ` r S(-TIriI a � t lI vim loT 9th ST. \ r- 1 RiVE-IRO)AIC` ST. t rnimI- IN, 1)1= ��! )A' I<S i R.W. GAMBLE \ I t STRFI r 1� /r 1� 1 V _ RESi.137i�� iJiJl 342/428 6L7 I 18.00 AC o�a STATE HIGH AY 29 4 ,— � = 0 3 210.00 374' L3�1 MOTT TRMI HOLDINGS M 1081/ _ - IN C'o m L.C.R.A, ITY `' L2 2059/669 0 N 1.2•117AC AYNESWORTH 52T 1.375AC 'a. N _- Z -- 506/ 229 OF WEST 13th ST. 199.68 0 6.34 A C TWN•N' Alr--- 1 r nl r-1 v� OL32 �vlvl v L.I lvl I I r r l REFE TO I MrJ r�lv• �n+-I-�� �6p // I I I I - 3 I 14 M ° JAY L. WOLF /OL33 WEST 14th ST. /M 359.00' ° 490/575 J 1 REFER TO N (24 AC) , ti �L34'°o�� LI 17 3 141 OL18 20.01 AC / , 1 I 3 AC ��" g00 OL36 �� .� 1 WEST 15th STREET a i h OL37 �� I I_ _ OL' J� 1 A a C'1 II 414' / GOY �'hV:,Y; 39 F4� Mc-IAve,) OL 52 WEST 16th TREET / T-E-X-As-AME-Rte*rt 8-AN-K r_ 1 r_ I / 1530 / 332 �` v` r' 14.90 AC 10.232 Ac, 2L 15 2 17 th S CITY OL13 51 L/ 357/493. LUTZ 1= 2.851 A^. y 2686/579 HOUSING N O L 7 W AUTHORIT v N/ A, v .i W r 1 1\ SUDDUTH Q Z :..::..r . rt ......... . /-�L I.V. U •. � 460 222 ..: ........... .: •.: m LOZANO GEORGETOWN I.S.D. 492/606 / HOLDEN 1 LACKEY 10.50 AC. 193 1337/600 SCENIC 2.02 AC ZAVALA 488/549 �Q PROPERTIES 7-0-4 886/676 DANIEL 1025/252 HOUSING AUTHORI /r 7.21 AC.� _ `y HART STREET ADAMS 2 OL50 461/35 OL I I o J IQUEZ 9 ?� 1 93/267 REFER TO REFER TO G PI'TALORGEUT OL 10 3 1616 3 1614 HOSPI'iAL AUTHORIT '`' N DAVIU 654/592 OL 49 CI 6.0AC LIJ TA',LOR �(n P WE LEYAN STARK 1206/682 H MES , INC. 892/400 2.80 AC .158AC 210o 1029/439 7.1864C OLLog ,B: k 0 48 OL47 J 4.2 , 4 AC U. HA IS �. . 586:331 a� FIe1H MOBIL 3.U76 AC` HOME PARk BURNHAM �' •' 541 /324 r 34 GEORGETC,,vN 3IB / ,45 HOSPITAL AUTH. 49 AC. 2.922 AC. V� 1 �.I_) �� � ,•111_ ^ r". at SPEARS 22STREET •. O LACKEY Mr . 12/91 Council meeting April 23, 1996 Item No. AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET ac! SUBJECT: Consideration of a Variance to the access and driveway separation standards of the Subdivision Regulations for Serenada Country Estates, Unit...One, Lot 4. ITEM SUMMARY: The proposal is to allow more driveways on the subject site than what is permitted by the design standards and a rezoning of the lot that occurre4_,in 1993. The applicant proposes three (3) driveways; an entrance only driveway on Williams Drive and two (2), two (2) way driveways on Serenada Drive. The design standards and the rezoning permit only one (1) driveway to Serenada Drive. In order to permit the driveways as proposed, variances to Sections 34020 F.3., Access for Corner Lots, 33044, Driveway Separation From Intersections and Table 33030-A, Driveway Access Separation would have to be granted. Prior to requesting this variance a representative of the applicant met with the City staff to discuss the standards and probable designs. While the staff did not indicate that any of the discussed options could be supported by staff, several were presented to the applicant to help provide some direction in proposing a request. Some of the options discussed were; to design the site in conformance with the design standards and the conditional rezoning, request a variance to create and use a shared driveway with Lot 5 and request a variance to establish an entrance only driveway onto Williams Drive. The applicant chose to request a variance to establish an entrance only driveway onto Williams Drive in addition to requesting a variance for the placement of the proposed driveways onto Serenada Drive. The reason for the limitation of driveways on corner lots is due to the desire to reduce the number of conflicts on a heavily traveled roadway. It is especially important to apply such a standard to Williams Drive, which has a high traffic volume and many existing conflict points on other sites that cannot be eliminated because of non -conforming provisions. Therefore, the only means of limiting the number of driveways onto Williams Drive is by applying the standard to newly developing sites. The proposed use of the site at this time is a convenience store. The lot has 259 feet of frontage on Williams Drive and 389 feet of frontage on Serenada Drive. The proposed driveways onto Serenada Drive do not conform to separation standards from intersections or each other. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: None. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. COMMENTS: At its April 2, 1996, meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 4-2 to deny the requested variances to Sections 34020 F.3., 33044 and table 33030-A for Lot 4 of Serenada Country Estates, Unit One thereby permitting one (1) driveway onto Serenada Drive and no driveways onto Williams Drive, consistent with the conditions of approval of the most recent rezoning. RECOMMENDED MOTION: If this item is approved by the City Council, it will be consistent with the Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendation, unless stated otherwise. ATTACHMENTS: Staff report Submitted By. Edward J. Barry, AICP - Director Hildy L. Kingma, AICP Division of Development Services Chief Planner VARIANCE TO THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS FOR SERENADA COUNTRY ESTATES, UNIT 'ONE, LOT 4; LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF WILLIAMS DRIVE AND SERENADA DRIVE. OWNER / APPLICANT: Mr. Hartzell B. Elkins 2508 River Forest Drive Bryan, TX 77802-2827 409/823-8133 FAX 409/821-3244 AGENT: Mr. Rick Hughes Strasburger Enterprises, Inc. 4 North 3rd Street P. O. Box 6117 Temple, Texas 76503-6117 817/778-3547 FAX: 817/778-6807 REQUEST: Variance to the access and driveway separation standards of the Subdivision Regulations for Serenada Country Estates, Unit One, Lot 4, as recorded in CIbinet B, Slides 339-344 in the Official Plat Records of Williamson County, Texas. FACTS: Location: Williams Drive (F.M. 2338) and Serenada Drive. SEE EXHIBIT A Existing Site: Undeveloped commercial lot. Existing Zoning: C-2A, Commercial First Height, with access limitations and required public review of Detailed Development Plan for C-2A uses. Proposed Use: Convenience store Surrounding Uses and Zoning: North: Undeveloped commercial lot (C-1) South: Jiffy Mart convenience store (out of City) East: Undeveloped commercial lots (C-1 and C-2A) West: Undeveloped commercial lots (C-2A) Notification: Notification requirements have been completed. Variance - Serenada Country Estates, Unit One, Lot 4 April 18, 1996 VR 96-05/ File:SRNDAES4.VAR Page 1 CM:CS History: The Final Plat of Serenada Country Estates was approved by City Council on August 2, 1973 and recorded on August 9, 1973. Lots 1-8 were rezoned from RS to C-2A and C-1 by the City Council on August 18, 1988 with the condition that the site be developed consistent with a site plan that was filed with the rezoning request. On December 22, 1992, the City Council approved a rezoning for Lot 1 which voided the rezoning action in 1988 since the rezoning; of Lot 1 would not be included in the approved site plan. The City Council also initiated a rezoning for the remaining seven (7) lots. The rezoning to remove the site plan restriction was approved on May 11, 1993, with the condition that Lot 1 is permitted a driveway on Williams Drive, Lot 2 is permitted a driveway on Williams Drive, the two (2) corner lots, Lots 3 and Lot 4 are each permitted a driveway on Serenada Drive, Lots 5 and 6 share a driveway on Williams Drive. Lots 7 and 8, both interior lots with no frontage on Williams Drive, each are permitted their own driveway onto Serenada Drive. ANALYSIS: The proposal is to allow more driveways on the subject site than what is permitted by the_ design standards and a rezoning of the lot that occurred in 1993. The applicant proposes three (3) driveways; an entrance only driveway on Williams Drive and two (2), two (2) way driveways on Serenada Drive. The design standards and the rezoning permit only one (1) driveway to Serenada Drive. In order to permit the driveways as proposed, variances to Sections 34020 F.3. , Access for Corner Lots, 33044, Driveway Separation From Intersections and Table 33030-A, Driveway Access Separation would have to be granted. Prior to requesting this variance a representative of the applicant met with the City staff to discuss the standards and probable designs. While the staff did not indicate that any of the discussed options could be supported by staff, several were presented to the applicant to help provide some direction in proposing a request. Some of the options discussed were; to design the site in conformance with the design standards and the conditional rezoning, request a variance to create and use a shared driveway with Lot 5 and request a variance to establish an entrance only driveway onto Williams Drive. The applicant Variance - Serenada Country Estates, Unit One, Lot 4 VR 96-05/ File:SRNDAES4.VAR CM:CS April 18, 1996 Page 2 chose to request a variance to establish an entrance only driveway onto Williams Drive in addition to requesting a variance for the placement of the proposed driveways onto Serenada Drive. The reason for the limitation of driveways on corner lots is due to the desire to reduce the number of conflicts on a heavily traveled roadway. It is especially important to apply such a standard to Williams Drive, which has a high traffic volume and many existing conflict points on other sites that cannot be eliminated because of non -conforming provisions. Therefore, the only means of limiting the number of driveways onto Williams Drive is by applying the standard to newly developing sites. This fact was realized by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council in 1993 when a rezoning was requested for the site. Serenada Country Estates, Lots 1-8 were already zoned C- 2A by Council action in 1988. A condition of the 1988 rezoning was that the lots must develop consistent with a site plan presented by the applicant at the time. The site plan proposed 15 office buildings on the eight (8) lots. The proposed development had two (2) driveways onto Serenada Drive and a shared driveway with Lot 5 on Williams Drive. SEE EXHIBIT C At that time, the current design standards were not in place nor were the detailed development plan (DDP) provisions. All lots were owned by the same entity. After the rezoning in 1988, the Resolution Trust Corporation acquired the lots and proceeded to sell them individually. It was at this time that the current owner acquired the subject lot. In 1992 the owner of Lot 1, the southernmost lot, applied for a rezoning to remove the site plan condition for the purpose of constructing an auto repair shop confined to only Lot 1, rather than an office building. The requested rezoning of Lot 1 would make it impossible for the remaining lots to develop consistent with the 1988 approved site plan since the site plan applied to all eight (8) lots. The owners of the other lots, including the current owner of Lot 4, were notified of the pending action. In February of 1993 the City Council initiated a rezoning for the remaining seven (7) lots, again notifying all owners of the Variance - Serenada Country Estates, Unit One, Lot 4 VR 96-05/ File:SRNDAES4.VAR CM:CS April 18, 1996 Page 3 subject lots. The rezoning was approved to remove the site plan condition and conditions of access were applied to the lots. Based on that rezoning Lot 4 may have one (1) driveway onto Serenada Drive and none onto Williams Drive. The condition reduced the overall number of access points along Williams Drive for eight (8) lots from four (4) in the previous site plan to three (3). Lot 3, across Serenada Drive from Lot 4, also must take its access from Serenada Drive. SEE EXHIBIT D The proposed use of the site at this time is a convenience store. The lot has 259 feet of frontage on Williams Drive and 389 feet of frontage on Serenada Drive. The proposed driveways onto Serenada Drive do not conform to separation standards from intersections or each other. The standard separation from the intersection is 300 feet and the standard separation between each driveway is 450 feet. Given the dimensions of the lot, one (1) driveway can be permitted in an 88 foot area adjacent to Lot 8. SEE EXHIBIT E In the attached Documentation of Basis for Requested Variance the applicant states that allowing one (1) driveway onto Serenada Drive could be dangerous since vehicles on Serenada Drive stopped at the traffic signal will queue and block the driveway. Therefore, the vehicles coming from Williams Drive that turn onto Serenada Drive will be unable to turn left into the site due to the vehicles blocking the driveway. It is for this reason that there are separation standards from intersections. With the driveway located no closer than 300 feet, approximately 20 vehicles would have to be stopped at the traffic signal on Serenada Drive in order to block the driveway. There is not enough frontage on Serenada Drive to allow two (2) driveways that are spaced at least 450 feet apart, in conformance with the standards. Of the two (2) proposed driveways, the one closest to Williams Drive is approximately 80 feet from the intersection. The driveway on Williams Drive is also closer to the intersection than the standard allows. It is approximately 150 feet from the intersection and the standard distance is a minimum of 450 feet. The entrance only driveway proposed appears to reduce the number of potential conflicts on Williams Drive since vehicles will not be exiting the subject site and crossing the northbound lanes to head south at the same time avoiding vehicles entering Variance - Serenada Country Estates, Unit One, Lot 4 VR 96-05/ File:SRNDAES4.VAR CM:CS April 18, 1996 Page 4 the site. The proposal also allows southbound vehicles turning into the subject site to queue in the left turn lane before crossing the northbound lanes. However, it may be difficult to prohibit vehicles from exiting the subject site through the driveway. The typical means of discouraging exits on entrance only driveways is through signage. The driveway on Williams Drive at the McDonalds restaurant is one example of such signage. Further, the proposed entrance only driveway is 45 feet wide. This width is the widest permitted by"the design standards and would probably appear to be an entrance and exit driveway to motorists both on the site and in the street based on its width. Therefore, the driveway will actually be used as two (2) way driveway creating the conflicts that are sought to be avoided. One option is to reduce the width of the driveway to allow only the width of one (1) vehicle. A narrower driveway may indicate to the motorist that it is not a two (2) way driveway and prevent some exiting vehicles. However, a narrower driveway may cause a greater problem if a vehicle is exiting at the same time that a vehicle is turning off of the right-of-way into the subject site. The motorist in the vehicle entering the site may not realize that the driveway is not wide, enough to accommodate both vehicles until it is across the travel lanes. While the entrance only driveway may (appear to be a valid alternative, it is not suggested due to its potential for confusion among motorists. In cases where similar variances were approved to allow corner lots to have access to the higher classification street, the subject lots had frontage along the higher classification street which was sufficient to divide and create two (2) lots. If that would be done, the lot farthest from the intersection would be permitted its own driveway, thereby resulting in the requested driveway without a variance. Such variances were approved contingent upon the Commission and Council placing conditions concerning the exact location of the driveways. Being that the lot in question has 259 feet of frontage on Williams Drive, it is not possible to divide it into two (2) lots and comply with the standards. Therefore, this request is not similar to recently approved requests. VARIANCE: After listening to the testimony presented at the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, and reading the documentation Variance - Serenada Country Estates, Unit One, Lot 4 VR 96-05/ File:SRNDAES4.VAR CM:CS April 18, 1996 Page 5 provided by the applicant and the staff's recommendation, the Commission makes the following finds of fact as required by the Subdivision Regulations: 1. The public convenience and welfare will be substantially served; and 2. The appropriate use of surrounding property will not be substantially,,,or permanently impaired or diminished; and 3. The applicant has not created the hardship from which relief is sought; and 4. The variance will not confer upon the applicant a special right or privilege not commonly shared or available to the owners of similar and surrounding property; and 5. The hardship from which relief is sought is not solely of an economic nature." 6. The variance is not contrary to the public interest; and 7. Due to special conditions, the lateral enforcement of the ordinance would result in an unnecessary hardship; and 8. In granting the variance the spirit of the ordinance is observed and substantial justice is done." The applicant's Documentation for Basis of Requested Variance. form is attached. STAFF RECOMVIENDATION: Denial of the requested variances to Sections 34020 F.3. , 33044 and Table 33030-A for Lot 4 of Serenada Country Estates, Unit One, thereby permitting one (1) driveway onto Serenada Drive and no driveways onto Williams Drive, consistent with the conditions of approval of the most recent rezoning. P & Z ACTION: At its April 2, 1996, meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 4-2 to deny the requested variances to Sections 34020 F.3. , 33044 and table 33030-A for Lot 4 of Serenada Country Estates, Unit One thereby permitting one (1) driveway onto Serenada Drive and no driveways onto Williams Drive, consistent with the conditions of approval of the most Variance - Serenada Country Estates, Unit One, Lot 4 April 18, 1996 VR 96-05/ File:SRNDAES4.VAR Page 6 CM:CS recent rezoning. Variance - Serenada Country Estates, Unit One, Lot 4 VR 96-05/ File:SRNDAES4.VAR CM:CS April 18, 1996 Page 7 EXHIBIT A w.ztssc. CFDg=KlA ,& [`[111A1TRY 1=CTATFC IMIT f1NF 1 OT d •.. r 171 l., J.• t V �. t• F i Ar.11 lv'h(-1E fin rc-c _ u1 n uln, 0. ax0 al FROPIAIr v[,' to to •0 4 IU1',w( tN'MC•1 tY s(AfNAOA \\� IAGICs ` I �� :. a (ursC ^• +'t V r.-C A A/J+,1IID ra, A/Y'A Ov VIa, WOOW VOr fR IA An Cr ,r. S' lArr OVI rCR 'n _ +/',1,C, AO, l-- +M ry.c KAut. (.0 4,.�.. .���r r.^ ,n..l U3 f)V// 0 l .^,t, A: •y ,-t'^...^r .• r.. GOC) S(�(J] )(/11 (( ppA� ��(( S ._ �_'i C -; � it �� � � r� 1 p ut = L, - 1, N.1 rAICi LWwH a•, SA rr rLm As ( w I r. rO A,ro y,ACA rl WA,Nl6rS'fAvC'�IGt JO'Q'�i '� .. f ►( IAnr(cl(0 fAOW D,I,AU DV,r,C CCti$Tv#Lcf,O., nl0 J uc(s eacAuo a, nw AAC IALDCwunlr UK o.x d s to [ ,�-a�(T IY LA/40 SCM'C ; Flo sr -� `c nlo'Y 70 ` t t. IA((s uAr sc vA.lv,ta Of sw,Lr rAO,ID(D At rtA,AA Assoc Irc s IAIt f,ueal LIT o O , "i r '�� r el'-o• Ieo'-o _ _ I-` ICJ,iY 1. )Kw D000cuI vtAUQICE 0AIo' _ - F - _ — S1 Y G£ C11,�0 $O.i- 1 1'r.ot o•A" r(wcc - 6 - 'fT. CUII On6 on L �- d h 1 15,200 O.- -� Ic..�, r •� -D• _ _ — — — \ \ N to p I-ST�� `i _ 11_ a rn.c-�>_. $1 srltt�s 7 ° too - J OfnC£ _ \ I rd-0NO1 = 17.000 SO.fT. _ 1 r'o' s'. S; s- At .r �o �$iORY 8 y .. r C • - r• 1 ' ni0•- 1 I - 51(R Y 00 ICE - cr ofncC v.�oo SQ.n• _ ��� _l d_,• _ _ J i �� e111.D 1 j0 600_cfc T1 _ _ ` Jo' r • (. LL 3� 1-STORY 1 u - b 1_�0ii1� RCTNI 0,00 - � ti.,c t� �•..cs [ Ic.� s ,_ rt + . l �- b o k- sod d 1-$ IORYg ,� o _ p,D e,.�- 13, 1 .o t" [ ° Alt- y I l: �� 10.-0:r _ U r . L _ 1. 1 •�tN �V1`Y ry ' !' —. t �7-� 1 ! ,1t 1 r 1., �• :I ) f ORI ti j¢ SO F — if l(� 1� 199.6; J k- _ rACrt� It s I-ST T' � O! •� � llf �-� low ttr.) / 1 15 x , S N� aLOCAL DESCRIP T 101 I W aE So 0 _ 1 •I Als- / Cols 1-9 r,ciusl�e, SERCNA0A COVIIIRY CS r. !CS Ul1l; 01,E, Ail A00111LI11 Ill cCC•liGClGsv.tt, :Eri occordir.9 to the map of plot Ihcrcof rccudc-1 Ln � Aldv - " -a• / ,s..,{ '� CADIIICT 9. SLIDES »9-345. 'MLLIA'AS0J1 CO3,'11 •• r e,/ - - . h !/ PLAT RCCOI+UAiry Simi■V• lit .d / etY-- -�� O,..Lt N V, A�C w / — IAI•ION LX9 / I,o l y6,s,' all , 3 8 u s ra1, rn t s / 2 7 vw,a R -� } / 110 e�0 CONCEPTUAL e>, WI Lj�G SITE PLAN P' 111 5 C A L C 1 113 r r ti A LOCATION MAP SITE TA©UL1�T10j1 SITE 1 SITE 2 SITE J ,ITE I_'4_ 1 SITE S SITE G SITE 7 SITE D ff TOiAI TI ---- -- -- - --_ -_ _-- - I --` F -- a SCRCIUUA CCtIrr111Y CSfAiCS, A I,Jsc s+. �t. LJaw t nl son. I11A e1,o11 soT c •1111 sn—n� j7b12� ll:r}1-5611. jI11�[A [Z671:' jJ.I A S.l)f�OJ,. 1�u. 17 .+o7-i3T,. r. -1ji„r icrf_I (Kxa,+D AA 1,.s 1f> 10o soli. 7).sx IJIDo sail. Ilx I.soo SoJ, 1Ll_�� _ UIRr I - CUs15tC/fCIA(. 11A 11IDO iori. Iox 1J,D0 So --rTiT 1o,e-3o .w{f, J,x J1,soo sort. l+a�ir.soo :orLl;Lo� �s�)co sore 'CCRIU'IC0 SA�IHCS A5SO(_1AI1C'I e(>NewCAµOLJS COY. n 4 1 1 x I 1 sb�1. tc 1.Lri sort -�At 7yrLs so/f �fCi-f 0-jF167C. �Ie n_,J sot " ex 11.0)a Bois. s. i.i>i sail. I ,II Aus�1 A (hJ• :(rnneloN, sn+s Je.,:, I`L'nasol+L �ofr._� A ', „n '.GIs V. ICC 7J.J 11 SZ( 11x 7'J'1 :ort.' 173 t0.$)1 SO 1I. 1)x ,�,i,-ii, 1;. ',Ii W 11) sots. u.;' t)7 :J%1. �.'.;1 .'LC11 :C.!' I- f"'•1 _',.D'1 ^f l.' �1:_...A_J) 1tL ,—,- 1�— -- lA,.(15CAr( u(A f(is+O,S COY, 7)Js I],JSI soli I[. IJ,O 11 .� lI' 3ZJ7 Jj117iDTf � 111si.cS�l (1)x )D.�! :OtI )Lx i.r0:9 :-rTl� (.�7')?E.7`s—iC`Ir`(:�.'� Jn.e:.) SCrI. IIf�0lAJlD CLSAS;ZR 1NO OS;C_ InC [S sr/C(S I1 Y•C(s o, �f(S s) v I "7 iViCl� r l�:5 !M S'+Ct., J !O( Y't,l JlinlS $Ir,■I, $li(. 0' SrAcr1 SI YAC(S -� ACLI II 6P,c(S �_- L--- _ : L .—, .T,- -•- ---- t - - I CAR,71.s su.r1. •.v�v} :DriA; 1 .iI let s.r1. I C.aptlo.t ft,o, 7b616 (R Del EJ: C IWrlC sr, CC I cAAL�t�on c•r cA+17re sort _... _I cA■ '! suit 1 cAAnsl w11 11. _! c•A �1, $ort - I culLn, soli, j- ... .: �...1: _t - --- - - - - - An111,I•AOE NO Tr` •.•• u, 11 /' orAout r(r.cr•� IAAAr 0, ►ow 011 F'ACp(Alr UK.' '• !. A LAI{SCAf` rx A/r b1AL{ 1( 14^+1110 FOR FVY'AO%'A.L Vl'd, tV"( lDCA11d1 CY StACHAOA AF`I•IK, Ad, (: ,AA NOGY(AuI. (u 4...,r.r 1,t v.n .....1 SV6PNV0'r (HtAAI.Ct WAL)J l r•rar A: ry •'1'^.-...� .r N LOLj (hip pa �( 70' Oul Dlr,c Ll�,( 1. W rACCI S110PA4 Crl SIR MM AA( C71,M1.0 AHp PIA" (ALAI OAA,AU ,IIO�01 A Cp.S �JC h1& -, It PA0ttC1C0 DUAJ14 CP•SM1 Krldv, J. IACCS /pCAICO 011 F%A4 AA( IACOGwIAntr" 0" Or S' 10 1 \ S lJ 4aW(1(R CA(Al1tA. I!' lANOSGAr'C AU(rU /1p SI' y , -� R10'=V1 1. IAt(S WAY V( VAJV,CO BY Rovgv(1 M01t000 IT T1AAA ASM ►K ' f MCC S%usoL - - -- O ( tI(r hUUUI+ Q S Y. J.(M D(C7000S LrAtm Q O •� A 10' •+, IG - S /' IAOI o'AOLA rCHC( nnY 0 - 9 d I LOI 10 IU I� 20' LkA,�-c v4 IC>•+ur rood > yr \ r. oil IR.GI L.• S(11(•1 ACCESS APPROVED FOR LOT 1 12/22/92 ACCESS FOR LOTS 5 & 6 LOCATION MAP SITE TABULATION SITE 1 SITE 2 SITE 3 SITE '4 SITE 5 SITE �f 6 SITE- SITE© TOTAL �1 s[R[r+.�oA ca�riii�r-[sinks,^ Z 1i7C1dTf Y 11A { fT2L7T. a 11 .o sue. 1F• r7iTlriGrT 1.)SA SJ, !1. LJAA ( I11 S0/7. L11A el.o)) so! ei11 sdFl irnTY11.06 S 7i. _ —Ti. � I UNIT I - COWWERCIAL t1(ALDwO AA I7.> In)DO SOIL. 7LSt u{00 Sol ux I,0, sor 17 I((0o sort. _ tox Ir •oo soul. _ TR )o.o &a )r7c )1 soo so.rs. rIA )Lsoo :o(T1 70: I».7co sort. _ 7_-:CCRTIrIC0 SA\tt(GS ASSOCIAlIC'1 11 ,11 x I 1G J,111 sor Ax 7111 soil. lx 15O 57( 1{x 17__17 so.r. a x 11.050 So F1. � , l�I,G )1 So/[.I ! 11-1?9�'�_'_1 •_1111 AV51.+ A�Oej! :(C„c(IONI_ r[).11 7M.1 C(Y1C yAll( wCAµ0u1 COv. - _ - - — _,xl-'1.CI1 :C.. •' 1 .�.0'1 ,•., 1.' 1! ( 1 1 r _ - A , X.— Tn v. bJ, 1cG 7iJ1: sr 1lx 712::1 :o.r1.l ut w.$)1 so.rl. Ox 1z,(r1 ?�i;. ,{x w,r17 sore. u� ;; 17i il. �- T r`— �— 1RpIMD [ISAS:£A AND ASSOC u1G lA,osurt AAu r(xµa,s cov. 7)sx u,7ll wr 1{. D.o sa 1., sLrTT 7(�77117�DTL — ux 1e.1e1 s r —(1)x )o, 71 sor . )cx 1,e:o rT.l� j. 7�-)-t.7`77C'�:i.- ta1.e:.TsscrL JJ I {S YACCS {1 Y C(S Ip+�S'-+f.(S 1 1 S�CI� 1 S��CYS. L--- - 1f� S'at,. -J I101 Wrrl 17inl.ti $lrrAl, $fill 0 YACCS A 'f YACCS ---- S! AC[i le :J',C(S--- 1_-_—_' I CAR,11. SU.rI, I iG!_Oili1 I -.Lilt{ Sr.I., �I �Gagrlo.•.� iro1 )i)616 (•i� (OS-'E)� .uu,crO+rKt S/,cc _cLA�2+iorl C', cAA�^e So1r I cAA u1 su.(I I C.AAnl1 Su l 11. I C•A u) so.rl - I CVIL317 $Oil r---••-- ... NOTE: ACCESS FOR LOTS 3, 4, 7 & 8 WILL BE FROM SERENADA DRIVE ONLY AND WILL BE DESIGNED ACCORDING TO CITY' DESIGN STANDARDS. DOCUMENTATION OF BASIS FOR REQUESTED VARIANCE Date: March 14, 1996 Applicant: Rick Hughes This request is for a variance from the literal enforcement of Section(s) of the Subdivision Regulations. Give a brief description of the variance requested: Variance description to allow a curb cut on a corner lot of a major arterial. You have requested a variance to the design standards of the Subdivision Regulations. In order to be able to recommend and approve such a variance, Section 60070 B. of the Regulations, requires that the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council must be able to "ensure that the variance is not contrary to the public interest and, due .to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship." The commission and Council are directed to meet these requirements by making specific findings of fact. In order to assist the Commission and Council in conducting their deliberations regarding your requested variance, please complete this form to document how this request will impact the issues described below. These issues relate directly to the eight (8) findings of fact that must be cited by the Commission and Council when recommending approval of any variance. You may attach an additional sheet, or submit this information in the form of a letter. 1. In what manner will the public convenience and welfare be substantially served? The requested variance will provide for greater safety to motorists and pedestrians for a number of reasons: Traffic coming from the subdivision on Sereneda may back up beyond the proposed curb cut on that street, especially during morning rush hours when the traffic light is red to traffic entering Williams Drive from Sereneda. Motorists on Williams that cannot enter the property directly from Williams will be forced to turn onto Sereneda and cross the traffic that is backed up because of the traffic light. The right lane of Williams could easily become gridlocked due to that backup. Since Williams is a more heavily traveled street than Sereneda, the bulk of the location's business will likely come from motorists on Williams. In applicant's opinion, it would be more, not less, safe for that traffic to enter directly from Williams. The cut requiring the variance will be an ingress -only curb cut, which should present little or no safety hazard to traffic on Williams. 2. Will the appropriate use of surrounding property be substantially or permanently impaired or diminished in any manner? Provide reasons why you believe your answer to be supportable. The surrounding property will not be adversely affected or impaired in any way. To the best of applicant's knowledge, immediately adjacent properties on Williams Dr. are vacant. 3. What are the hardships involved? How were those hardships created? How are those hardships different from those affecting the rest of the public faced with the enforcement of this same provision? Note that the Commission and Council cannot approve a variance for which the hardship claimed is solely of an economic nature. Both motorists on Williams Drive and residents of the subdivision fed by Sereneda would be adversely affected by a denial of the variance. The curb cut will reduce the commercial traffic on the residential street. I feel comfortable the residents of Sereneda Country will appreciate less traffic on Sereneda Drive, not more traffic. Motorists will be inconvenience at best, and put at risk at worst. Applicant would refer the reader to the answer to question number one for a full and complete explanation of this assertion. t_ The residents of the subdivision will be inconvenienced by the traffic which will be forced off Williams Drive onto Sereneda in order to gain entry to the premises. While all traffic from the site will exit the property via Sereneda, most of that traffic will immediately turn right, away from the subdivision, in order to get back onto Williams. The right turn presents far less safety concern than a left turn onto the property would cause. One of the characteristics our retail business relies on is easy accessibility to the site. Not many people need to suddenly stop to see their doctor, title company, CPA, etc. Many of our customers suddenly remember, on the way home, that they need bread, milk, lotto tickets, gas, etc. If our site does not have easy access, we cannot provide service to the community. 4. If the requested variance is approved will it confer upon the applicant a special right or privilege not commonly shared or available to the owners of similar and surrounding property? Provide reasons why you believe your answer to be supportable. Granting the variance will not confer special privilege or competitive advantage on the applicant. The convenience store immediately across Williams Drive from the subject property has two curb cuts on Williams; the granting of the variance would simply put applicant in a reasonably similar competitive position. 5. How is the public interest affected? The public interest is affected in all the ways already stated. Additionally, there is no other fuel and food offering to the public on the same side of Williams Drive for some distance. Applicant's offering to the general public will be enhanced by the granting of the variance, simply because it will be more convenient and less dangerous for the motorist to enter the property from Williams Drive. 6. List the special conditions that affect this property and justify the approval of the variance. Applicant has done its best to bring all the conditions justifying the approval of the variance to the Commission and Council in its preceding answers. 7. How will the spirit of the ordinance be observed if this request is granted? We believe the spirit of the ordinance to be rooted in the concern for safety and quality of life of the citizens of Georgetown. Applicant contends that its request for variance fully supports and enhances that spirit. The safety of motorists and pedestrians will be enhanced and the quality of life for both` motorists and residents of the nearby subdivision will be maintained as a result�of the one way cut on Williams Drive. 8. How will substantial justice be done if this request is granted? Applicant has purchased the property in question in an effort to provide first class service and products to the residents of Georgetown, and to make a fair profit in the process. We believe we can offer true convenience by allowing traffic to enter the premises directly from Williams Drive. The granting of the variance will provide applicant with the best opportunity to do that. CITY OF GEORGETOWN NOTICE TO SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS OF A PUBLIC MEETING Notice is hereby given that the City of Georgetown will hold its regular public meeting of the PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. This meeting will be held on the 2nd day of April 1996, at 6:00 p.m. at its regular meeting place in the Council Chambers, 101 East 7th`' Street, Georgetown, Texas to consider the proposed: Variance to the Subdivision Regulations for Serenada Country Estates, Lot 4, located at Serenada Drive and Williams Drive. As orie of the owners of aujacent property you are invited to be present at such meeting if you desire to discuss the proposed plan. See attached Exhibit A for more detail. Date:3/ 18/96 City of Georgetown A copy of the planning report related to this item will be available at the Division of Development Services and the Georgetown Public Library no later than the Friday prior to the meeting described above. For further information phone the Development Services Division at 930-3575. PROPERTY OWNER'S COMMENTS Project Name: Variance - Serenada Country Estates, Lot 4 Name of Respondent: E 1 i z a h e t h R. L i e se Address of Respondent: 1934 Wi11 owl ake Dri ve Hoaston, TX 77077 I am in favor: I object: 1/ �- i If you -%rish to submit written comment, please respond by 3/27/96 , it will be provided to therianning and Zoning Commission and City Council. Please reply to: City of Georgetown Development Services Division �£ P. O. Box 409- S. Georgetown, Texas 78627 CITY OF GEORGETOWN NOTICE TO SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS OF A PUBLIC MEETING Notice is hereby given that the City of Georgetown will hold its regular public meeting of the PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. This meeting will be held on the 2nd day of A ril 1996, at 6:00 p.m. at its regular meeting place in the Council Chambers, 101 East 7th Street, Georgetown, Texas to consider the proposed: Variance to the Subdivision Regulations for Serenada Country Estates, Lot 4, located at Serenada Drive and Williams Drive. As oric of the owners of adjacent property you are invited to be present at such meeting it you desire to discuss the proposed plan. See attached Exhibit A for more detail. Date:3/ 18/96 City of Georgetown A copy of the planning report related to this item will be available at the Division of Development Services and the Georgetown Public Library no later than the Friday prior to the meeting described above. For further information phone the Development Services Division at 930-3575. . ---------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY OWNER'S COMMENTS Project Name: Variance - Serenada Country Estates; Lot 4 Name of Respondent: Milton G . Lies e Address of Respondent: 1934 Wi 11 owl ake Drive, Houston, TX 77077-4961 I am in favor: I object: - woraw -Olt V If you %�rish to submit ���ritten comment, DlPase respond ley 3/27/96 , it will be provided to thePlanning and Zoning Commission and City Council. Please reply to: City of Georgetown Development Services Division _ P. O. Box 409 Georgetown, Texas 78627 MAR 2 5 1996 Council meeting April 23, 1996 Item No. AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET SUBJECT: Consideration of a Variance from the Subdivision Regulations for Churchill Farms, Section Five, Block A, Lot 14, located at 412 Stonehedge Boulevard ITEM SUI\MARY: This request is for a variance to Table 34020, Section 34030 and Section 34020 F.4. of the Subdivision Regulations. Table 34020 establishes the design standards for lots including a 25 foot front yard setback for single family dwellings. Section 34030 states that no permanent structure may be placed in or over any easement except a structure whose use and location are necessary to the designated use of the easement or which will otherwise not affect the use, maintenance or repair of such easement. Section 34020 F.4. states that the building line for all comer lots shall never be less than twenty-five (25) feet from an existing street right-of-way. The applicant's proposed six (6) foot tall fence is proposed to be situated on the southwestern comer lot at Reinhardt and Stonehedge Boulevards. The subdivision was platted with a twenty-five (25) foot front yard setback and Public Utility Easement (PUE) along both streets. The subject lot is vacant and no construction work has been initiated. The applicants have applied for, and received approval for a License to Encroach in the PUE by the Director of the Community Owned Utilities Division and other utility providers. Comer lots such as this have two (2) front yards, thereby requiring a 25 foot setback on each frontage. A variance is requested to allow the applicant's fence to encroach by ten (10) feet into the platted front yard setback and PUE. The purpose of front yard setbacks and PUEs, respectively, is to create a more uniform residential character along the street frontage and provide the appropriate width for the location of utilities. Lot 14 is triangular in shape and situated at the corner of Stonehedge and Reinhardt Boulevards. The location of this lot in relation to the adjacent land uses may provide a basis for waiving the setback and PUE requirements contained in the Subdivision Regulationg: Lot 14 is surrounded by a recreation center to the north on Stonehedge Boulevard, a wastewater lift station and detention area on the opposite side of Reinhardt Boulevard directly east, and a stormwater drainage easement and 100-year flood plain lot immediately south. Therefore, the proposed six (6) foot tall cedar fence would serve to screen the residence from views of the adjacent lift station and detention area located directly east of Lot 14. The nearest residences which would have a view of the proposed fence are located approximately 200 feet south of the subject parcel, at the corner of Reinhardt Boulevard and Preakness Place. The Community Owned Utilities Division supports placement of the fence fifteen (15) feet from the front property line along Reinhardt Boulevard, which is consistent with the applicant's proposal. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: None. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDED MOTION: At their regular meeting of April 2, 1996, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval of the requested variance to Table 34020, Section 34030 and Section 34020 F.4. of the Subdivision Regulations for Churchill Farms, Section Five, Block A, Lot 14, thereby allowing a six (6) foot tall fence to encroach by ten (10) feet into the platted 25 foot front yard setback and PUE, after making the required findings of fact. ATTACHMENTS: Staff report and attached exhibits. Submitted By: U , k /, .. J, I A I 11�gK ki-o� Edward J. Barry, AI - ly1rector Hildy L. g , AICP Division of Development Services Chief Pl r VARIANCE FROM THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS FOR CHURCHILL FARMS, SECTION FIVE, BLOCK A, LOT 149 LOCATED AT 412 STONEHEDGE BOULEVARD OWNER/APPLICANT: Bill Palmer Homes, Inc. 3215 Steck Avenue, Suite 200 Austin, Texas 78759 206-0700 FAX: 206-0123 REQUEST: Variance to the platted building setback requirements for Churchill Farms, Section Five, Block A, Lot 14 as recorded in Document No. 9550950 of the Official Deed Records of Williamson County, Texas. FACTS: Location: Stonehedge Boulevard at Reinhardt Boulevard. SEE EXHIBIT A Existing Site: Platted lot.= Existing Zoning: RS, Residential Single Family Proposed Use: Single family residential. Surrounding Uses and Zoning: Single family residences (RS) Notification: The notification requirements have been completed. The notification letters sent to property owners within 200 feet of the subject parcel were mailed one (1) day after the posting deadline. History: The Final Plat for Churchill Farms, Section Five was recorded on October 10, 1995. ANALYSIS: This request is for a variance to Table 34020, Section 34030 and Section 34020 F.4. of the Subdivision Regulations. Table 34020 establishes the design standards for lots including a 25 foot front yard setback for single family dwellings. Section Variance - Churchill Farms, Sec. Five, Block A, Lot 14 April 15, 1996 VR#96-02/ File:CHRCHIL5.VAR Page 1 CM/WW 34030 states that no permanent structure may be placed in or over any easement except a structure whose use and location are necessary to the designated use of the easement or which will otherwise not affect the use, maintenance or repair of such easement. Section 34020 F.4. states that the building line for all corner lots shall never be less than twenty-five (25) feet from an existing street right-of-way. The applicant's proposed six (6) foot tall fence will be situated on the southwestern corner lot at Reinhardt and Stonehedge toulevards. The subdivision was platted with a twenty-five (25) foot front yard setback and Public Utility Easement (PUE) along both streets. SEE EXHIBIT B The subject lot is vacant and no construction work has been initiated. The applicants have applied for, and received approval for a License to Encroach in the PUE by the Director of the Community Owned Utilities Division and other utility providers. The request for a License to Encroach will be considered by the City Council at the same time as this variance request. Corner lots such as this have two (2) front yards, thereby requiring a 25 foot setback on each frontage. As shown in Exhibit B, a variance is requested to allow the applicant's fence to encroach by ten (10) feet into the platted front yard setback and PUE. The purpose of front yard setbacks and PUEs, respectively, is to create a more uniform residential character along the street frontage and provide the appropriate width for the location of utilities. Lot 14 is triangular in shape and situated at the corner of Stonehedge and Reinhardt Boulevards. The location of this lot in relation to adjacent land uses may provide a basis for waiving the setback and PUE requirements contained in the Subdivision Regulations. Lot 14 is surrounded by a recreation center to the north on Stonehedge Boulevard, a wastewater lift station and detention area on the opposite side of Reinhardt Boulevard directly east, and a stormwater drainage easement and 100-year flood plain lot immediately south. Therefore, the proposed six (6) foot tall cedar fence would serve to screen the residence from views of the adjacent lift station and detention area located Variance - Churchill Farms, Sec. Five, Block A, Lot 14 VR#96-02/ File:CHRCHIL5.VAR CM/WW April 15, 1996 Page 2 directly east of Lot 14. The nearest residences which would have a view of the proposed fence are located approximately 200 feet south of the subject parcel, at the corner of Reinhardt Boulevard and Preakness Place. The Community Owned Utilities Division supports placement of the fence fifteen (15) feet from the front property line along Reinhardt Boulevard, which is consistent with the applicant's proposal. VARIANCE: After listening to the testimony presented at the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, and reading the documentation provided by the applicant and the staff s recommendation, the Commission makes the following finds of fact as required by the Subdivision Regulations: 1. The public convenience and welfare will be substantially served; and 2. The appropriate use of surrounding property will not be substantially or permanently impaired or diminished; and 3. The applicant has not created the hardship from which relief is sought; and 4. The variance will not confer upon the applicant a special right or privilege not commonly shared or available to the owners of similar and surrounding property; and 5. The hardship from which relief is sought is not solely of an economic nature. " 6. The variance is not contrary to the public interest; and 7. Due to special conditions, the literal enforcement of the ordinance would result in an unnecessary hardship; and 8. In granting the variance the spirit of the ordinance is observed and substantial justice is done." The applicant's Documentation for Basis of Requested Variance form is attached. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the requested variance to Table 34020, Section 34030 and Section 34020 F.4. of the Subdivision Regulations for Churchill Farms, Section Five, Block A, Lot 14, thereby allowing a six (6) foot tall fence to encroach by ten (10) feet into the platted 25 foot front yard setback and PUE, after making the required findings of fact. Variance - Churchill Farms, Sec. Five, Block A, Lot 14 VR#96-02/ File:CHRCHIL5.VAR CM/WW April 15, 1996 Page 3 P & Z ACTION: Approval of the requested variance to Table 34020, Section 34030 and Section 34020 F.4. of the Subdivision Regulations for Churchill Farms, Section Five, Block A, Lot 14, thereby allowing a six (6) foot tall fence - to encroach by ten (10) feet into the platted 25 foot front yard setback and PUE, after making the required findings of fact. Variance - Churchill Farms, Sec. Five, Block A, Lot 14 VR#96-02/ File:CHRCHIL5.VAR CM/WW April 15, 1996 Page 4 EXHIBIT A CHURCHILL FARMS, SECTION FIVE 'o 0­10 L. 'ELLE' 589 AC I N4 -c 70 -c 24 00 ;C ,ON I CAq0LTW 0fLL SK&AKEY 2n,)/095 irr 56./267 579/.91 567 AC) 19 Do Ic- .,"Ar_ IAC d ?. AC -I C*'Ll c E.ORV CA.'-L'10- 5. 1/. 9 1 .56 5 Ar - I 120 LLII 1. bLOCK '._N. i SIONEHEOCE SECTION LO � 1 , BLG�;<. ' IJ „I ^►7HREC r , POOC/CLUBHOUSEI CO�s•/ � STONEHEDGE SECTION THREE , 2 L o c K g 2 0 I 3, CAB H' , SLDS. 43-45 �(' 1 ;I p J 16 17 _ PROPOSED / Y • ��—. J j o ° J 34 STONEHEDGE 31 8 0 U L E V A R D DETENTION ION FOUR 2c / �� \I U SECT ( { / X h- ✓v I, � � �/ N75'30'00'E 267.19' C4 W POND / O /� /Olvy a/ /$''►� �bFb �y O r�0y>1 Gc A C15- 82.I9--70.00•-)0.00'• •;cstla...t�. Oil` V .1 �AytiS 1 a� I 33 \ o (\ �6�J� <6P�S. "aau� r :i.. J p Q \�� 32 1,n S4� d DETENTION = `` �•� ` 3@ `�_. �yCA 5� k 0 ARE J s Q / O / b N h �, I T.'.• ::'•' O N• 363 1 r l �� m 8 `6� ° ° f £ H ��� 1� ' 11 1e a °� 0 2 1 W 13 :•t �i . •�1� CO E-2.847.2 C O V% Q .h/ �i.. _ O.pO 29g 1 /500'OO E rr ?s, )O-oO'' l� p $ m �$ ~ I SO59.48 i I410' /� i ` / \ \ !� o o �$ � In .� Fence ! / /3 D o° _ C2 , - GPI, �, \, co. ry 1 O 0 8 @ CI - �n r,/bi000•W. 1 / i ; " :- ---jo . Ecs._ —c10- �sP��.\�, \ \� 9. m..�`'•. i1� I I J":: proposed ♦ pC• a 1 1— / � O Q3� •W V rOj9.06 ( a /8 �3 I a l • 1� V 1 \J`, o � r� a `J \•3 I cs•�n. 5 8 / �� m `6�CJ. o �70'�/ 0 / .n „ C N 'P•P.\a', �� 6B.J3 35.67' nai Fq^ / = h •.�' 0' 40• rlb�..� �! �� 6 m % \ \f^ \� �. �hp4. N71'00'00 E `" E GR. ,N8$•p0. 30 ELECTRIC EASEMENT 110.00 SBSU NSy00�0E- ((�^C/ / VOL. 1369, PG. 108 Dr 1 K\1 \ p0 u �b �a T W 00 S. 0 a406e� �jE SD.Op. STORMWATER 20• 8L.-ern `� cP '� s o io `N,` J: 1 '��� seoo° f O,r to / 4 /a. ; e.z s,6z 46 `' .•_ DRAINAGE EASEMENT \soo sy , ' e^�� 6p.00°�E l� 6'1 z2 6' & 100YEAR 5 768 ACROD PLAIN eebou°o:� _ 10.oa `NZ b°,°° W / ES o-7z.00. E / 2 to 00•w • 'NBt ()O, 49 UI�O•E /� �•�` /a a ,� DETENTION POND l Lv O 23 ,_ i O it 0 C) � / E l., / A 70 B�. QQ DETENTION AREA. G fJ \ ?5 % 26 S80109138'W 29@r 14• - 1 _ STONEFIEDG O 1 iz —1._ _b 30 29 E-2.847, 1 D I I �.. ;i, E. SECTION TWO --• CAB. G , SLUS 233-28/, I I I) i ( (^ PREAKNESS I_ 'LACE 1 --.... •.._-_ .RAL NOTES (y, STONEHEDGE �} (,j SECTION ONE TOTAL ACREAGE 11.659 AC. ti (� CAB. ' G , SLDS. 280-28' NUMBER OF LOTS: 14 SFO: 1 0 E NUTABER OF BLOCKS: I WATER AND SEWER SERVICEGEORGETITY TO BE PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF TELEPHONE TO BEEPROVCDEO BY BE . CABLEPROVIDED By '0 UTILITIPAOvES BY WILLIAMSON COUNTY CABLEVISION. PROPOSED USE: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, ONE, STOP"VATER DETENTION LOT. PROPOSED ZONING RS. DENSITY 1 29 LOTS PER ACRE SIZE OF SMALLEST LOT. 10,480 S0 FT (0 241 A,_ I THIS SUBDIVISION IS LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS. MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS COVER PER LOT IS 40% .THE PROVISIONS OF THE CENTURY PLAN - DEVELOPMENT PLAT. S„AL, ALSO GOVERN THIS PROJECT. THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN A'''LIGNEI, VTENSITY LEVEL FIVE, AND THREE. 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN WILL BE FULLY CONTAINED WITHIN DAMN,'(,- RENTS OR PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAYS. (1 '10) FOOT WIDE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (P u C ) "PALL PF TO THE STREET R 0 w 'S, ACROSS ALL L ,TS E'-)L,N(•EL L, •I.',. F W 13) ACCESS TO RE INHARDT BOULEVARD IS PROHIBITED FR(IM LOT 14, bLDCK 14) F'RIOP TO GRADING, ANY TYPE OF EARTH MOVING, CCNJSTRUCTION or, li< LAND IN THIS DRAINAGEPLAEIGNED BY ON, OR UNDER PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER SHALL BE ASUBMITTED FORK THE ON. DEVELOPMENT. AND MODIFICATIONS THEREOF TO THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN AND THE COMMISSIONERS' COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL. 15) A FENCE MEETING THE REOUIPEMENTS OF SECTION 37040 OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE SHALL BE PROVIDED AS THE BUFFERIARD ALONG THE GEORGETOWN INNER LOOP 16� PLAT VARIANCE NOTE' A VARIANCE WAS GRANTED FOR THIS PLAT 10 ALLOW ONLY A SIX (6) F (,01 FENCE BE PROVIDED WI'IEN A TYPE 'E' BUFFERIARD IS REOu IRE. W VARIANCE WAS GRANTED 10 ALLOw THE RAT 10 OF LC,, LENGTH T(,(07 IH TO EXCEED 2 5 1 FOP LOT' 6-.1+ LEGEND • 1/: IRON ROD FOUND O 1/2' IRON ROD SET A NAIL FOUND M MONUMENT FOUND (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED HEREON) P.0 B. POINT OF BEGINNING B.L. BUILDING SETBACY LINE P.U.C. PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT R O.w. RICHT-OF-WAY O.C. DRAINAGE EASEMENT FFE FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION + SEE PLAT NOTES CHURCHILL FARMS SECTION FIVE Council meeting April 23, 1996 Item No. AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET EE SUBJECT: Consideration of a Preliminary Plat of a 5.01 acre tract in the David Wright Survey, to be known as Hempe Estates; and variances to the Subdivision Regulations. ITEM SUMMARY: The proposal is to create four (4) lots out of a parcel of land that is slightly larger than five (5) acres. The lots will get water service from the City of Georgetown, electric service from Pedernales Electric Corporation and will use individual septic systems. Generally, all lots exceed nearly all minimum standards for lot size and design. The proposed subdivision is entirely bounded by either dedicated streets or platted subdivisions. The only land in the vicinity that is not platted is the land north of the subject subdivision, across Cavu Road. All of the land in the vicinity that is east, west and south of the subject land has water and electric service. Wastewater service in those subdivisions is provided by individual septic systems. The standards for the provision of utility facilities requires that water, wastewater, drainage and transportation systems be extended to the perimeter of all subdivisions under consideration. The applicant requests a variance so that the water lines will not have to be extended to the eastern perimeter of the subdivision along either Vortac Lane or Cavu Road. Lot 2 has frontage on two (2) non -intersecting local streets and is therefore defined as a double frontage lot. This is prohibited by the design standards for lots. Reasons for prohibiting double frontage lots are to prevent vehicles "cutting -through" from one street to another and to discourage the placement of residences such that the rear of one residence would be adjacent to the front of other residences. By prohibiting double frontage lots the front of all residences should face the street, resulting in a consistent appearance. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: None. FINANCIAL IWACT: None. COMMENTS: At its April 2, 1996, meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 6-0 to approve the Preliminary Plat of a 5.01 acre tract in the David Wright Survey, to be known as Hempe Estates, provided the Technical Issues are addressed prior to City Council consideration, and also approval of variances to Section 41030 to allow the water lines as proposed and Section 34020 3,C.b. to allow Lot 2 to be a double frontage lot provided that a note is placed on the plat to restrict access to only one (1) of its frontages, after making the required findings of fact. Revised plats addressing the Technical Issues have been submitted to the City. RECOMMENDED MOTION: If this item is approved by the City Council, it will be consistent with the Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendation, unless stated otherwise. ATTACHMENTS: Staff report and plat. Submitted Bv: Edward J. Barry, AICP - Director Hildy L. Kingma, A CP Division of Development Services Chief Planner PRELIMINARY PLAT OF A 5.01 ACRE TRACT IN THE DAVID WRIGHT SURVEY, TO BE KNOWN AS HEMPE ESTATES, WITH VARIANCES TO THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS, LOCATED BETWEEN VORTAC LANE AND CAVU ROAD OWNER/APPLICANT: Mr. Edward Allan Hempe Ms. Gloria Ganae Hempe 2108 Green Oaks Court Georgetown, Texas 78628 512/218-8187 AGENT: Mr. Larry Wood 15922-D Hamilton Pool Road Austin, Texas 78738 512/263-1432 FAX: 263-1432 REQUEST: Preliminary Plat of a 5.01 acre tract in the David Wright Survey, to be known as Hempe Estates, as recorded in Volume 2692, Page 139 of the Official Deed Records of Williamson County, Texas; and variances to the Subdivision Regulations. FACTS: Location: Located between Vortac Lane and Cavu Road. SEE EXHIBIT A Existing Site: Undeveloped land. Existing Zoning: Located out of the City so zoning does not apply. Proposed Use: Four (4) single family residential lots. Surrounding Uses: Single family residential (out of City) Century Plan: The Century Plan -Development Plan designates this location as Intensity Level 2. The proposed subdivision can be accommodated within the development allowances of this intensity designation. SEE EXHIBIT B Notification: The notification requirements have been completed. Preliminary Plat - Hempe Estates April 18, 1996 PP 96-06/File: HEMPETP Page 1 CM:CS ANALYSIS: The proposal is to create four (4) lots out of a parcel of land that is slightly larger than five (5) acres. The lots will get water service from the City of Georgetown, electric service from Pedernales Electric Corporation and will use individual septic systems. Generally, all lots exceed nearly all minimum standards for lot size and design. The proposal indicates all side building setback lines as five (5) feet wide." The standard is that there shall be a total building setback width of 15 feet provided that each side has a building setback line that is at least a five (5) feet wide. Therefore, some of the building setback lines on this plat must be revised to comply with that standard. The applicant does not indicate that a variance to this standard is requested. The proposed subdivision is entirely bounded by either dedicated streets or platted subdivisions. The only land in the vicinity that is not platted is the land north of the subject subdivision, across Cavu Road. All of the land in the vicinity that is east, west and south of the subject land is subdivided and has water and electric service. Wastewater service in those subdivisions is provided by individual septic systems. I Variances: Section 41030, Continuity of Improvements The standards for the provision of utility facilities requires that water, wastewater, drainage and transportation systems be extended to the perimeter of all subdivisions under consideration. Given the location of this subdivision, water line extensions are required along Cavu Road on the north and Vortac Lane on the south. The existing water lines are located in the Cielo Drive and the Bosque Trail right-of-ways. Therefore, extension of a water line to the east on Cavu Road is proposed, since that is where the new lines will tie -into the system. SEE EXHIBIT D The applicant requests a variance so that the water lines will not have to be extended to the eastern perimeter of the subdivision along either Vortac Lane or Cavu Road. To serve Lots 3 and 4, which are the farthest to the east in the proposed subdivision, the applicant proposes two (2), two (2) inch water lines coming off of the new eight (8) inch water line. This has been approved by the Community Owned Utilities Division provided the variance to extend the lines to the perimeter is approved. If the lines Preliminary Plat - Hempe Estates PP 96-06/File: HEMPETP CM:CS April 18, 1996 Page 2 Preliminary Plat - Hempe Estates PP 96-06/File: HEMPE.PP CM:CS must be extended to be tied -into other lines, they must be eight (8) inches. The proposed fire hydrant, located at the northeast corner of Lot 1 is on an eight (8) inch line. Given that the land to the east, Serenada Air Country Estates, has water service, the extension of the water lines to the eastern perimeter is not necessary. The Community Owned Utilities Division has reviewed the requested variance and recommends approval. Section 34020 3.C.b., Double Frontage Lots Lot 2 has frontage on two (2) non -intersecting local streets and is therefore defined as a double frontage lot. This is prohibited by the design standards for lots. One reason for prohibiting double frontage lots is to prevent vehicles "cutting -through" from one street to another. Double frontage residential lots are only permitted without a variance when they front on an arterial street and a local or collector street. In these instances access may only be taken from the lower classification street. Some measures can be taken to discourage "cut -through" traffic. A note can be placed on the plat that restricts access to either of the streets on which the lot has frontage. The applicant may choose either street from which to restrict access. Another reason why double -frontage lots are prohibited is to discourage the placement of residences such that the rear of one residence would be adjacent to the front of other residences. By prohibiting double frontage lots the front of all residences should face the street, resulting in a consistent appearance. After listening to the testimony presented at the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, and reading the documentation provided by the applicant and the staff's recommendation, the Commission makes the following findings of fact as required by Section 60070.B of the Subdivision Regulations: 1. The public convenience and welfare will be substantially served; and April 18, 1996 Page 3 2. The appropriate use of surrounding property will not be substantially or permanently impaired or diminished; and 3. The applicant has not created the hardship from which relief is sought; and 4. The variance will not confer upon the applicant a special right or privilege not commonly shared or available to the owners of similar and surrounding property; and 5. The hardship from which relief is sought is not solely of an economic nature; and 6. The variance is not contrary to the public interest; and 7. Due to special conditions, the literal enforcement of the ordinance would result in an unnecessary hardship; and 8. In granting the variance the spirit of the ordinance is observed and substantial justice is done." Technical Issues: The Subdivision Regulations require that the following technical issues are addressed prior to Planning and Zoning Commission consideration of this application. In order to assist the applicant, however, this application has been forwarded to the Planning and Zoning Commission prior to the completion of the technical issues. Therefore, these items must be addressed by April 26, 1996, or the application will be forwarded to the Council with a recommendation for denial. Alternatively, the applicant has the opportunity to request a delay to the City Council's consideration of the application in order to complete the technical issues. Preliminary Plat - Hempe Estates PP 96-06/File: HEMPE.PP CM:CS 1. The side building setback lines shall be revised to be consistent with the design standards for lots. 2. The plat indicates two (2) lots as being Lot 4 and no Lot 3. Please revise the plat to eliminate one of the Lot 4s. 3. A vicinity map showing the proposed subdivision's location relative to other areas of the City shall be added to the plat April 18, 1996 Page 4 4. A note should be placed on the plat that restricts access to either Cavu Road or Vortac Lane from Lot 2. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of a Preliminary Plat of a 5.01 acre tract in the David Wright Survey, to be known as Hempe Estates provided the Technical Issues are addressed prior to City Council consideration. Approval of variances to Section 41030 to allow the water lines as proposed and Section 34020 3.C.b. to allow Lot 2 to be a double frontage lot provided a note is placed on the plat to restrict access to only one (1) of its frontages, after making the required findings of fact. P & Z ACTION: At its April 2, 1996, meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 6-0 to approve the Preliminary Plat of a 5.01 acre tract in the David Wright Survey, to be known as Hempe Estates, provided the Technical Issues are addressed prior to City Council consideration, and also approval of variances to Section 41030 to allow the water lines as proposed and Section 34020 3,C.b. to allow Lot 2 to be a double frontage lot provided that a note is placed on the plat to restrict access to only one (1) of its frontages, after making the required findings of fact. Preliminary Plat - Hempe Estates PP 96-06/File: HEMPETP CM:CS April 18, 1996 Page 5 22 23 EXHIBIT A. GV IBA lee 16. �{4 14 ,•"^' 2 Xl t.,J.G egANGUS ROAD I 6 I�k .'v i1 1 1/11J RANGVS r n f` 3g SC ,07 K I� 1 I V V C� II 9 3A I IS 13 4.079 AC S A t'a , UN I t / r p I.M.NAUSENFLUKE `7 r - .-.. 447/203 d i N z z 1.0 A.. 1o.89 AC. 0 29 SZ P 1 J a ,p 5 21 n r 1 zcv 4`O 27 f 1 V k 3 4 J Ira � 2 1 I ro a 1 J B 1 11 L.J t l W KEN EWAN EFER TO 2 0913 ITT DIETZ BILLIE TNO-WN 2099/ 196 1637/299 1439 /672 4.47 AC. MIKE MiLT011 3.e99 Ac. 1202Ac. &UU 1,0 Ac. 559 /459 (4.OAc) B, O Aa v', .. }��I `•�,•.•• • vv1rt�i L ■L JV •TI.:Y r.:. W O J tK ,•�'. ��T _ 0 13 14 61/iT ^•Tr1.T tsime ais.w r 3b 1 SfC c rat[ --lot IZ IS c)/6BOJT c. A, • % a+ cr.? 4 s. .c. .a• r. � a ° all Iu� qT4 I6 ^ 4C ItLAJ C.att a °ua. 4 17 f8 • +aK[ p .00 !••N, C M �TAT-!GLYNN 0. BUIE '.c 596 /030 r— ^ r r ( 362.15 Ac-) . SOAc .SOAc_ 264.33 A� •�7 T I 1 1 0 ER A Pt 1-0 RT CITY Of GEOR6CT0rWM 312 /204 473. 70 Ac. l I I i I1 ' I J CITY OF GEORGETOxw 312 / 20 4 473 70 A, GALL ROS9ON o .� °• 969/36 i L 4.66Ac T. J. ROSSON •` S12 / 450 t•,oP (30.02AC.) 725 Ac. ..�. �°. r �. r 1 i I' •,o i MARBERT C. NOORE ~ 1726/71S (6.951 Ac.) rtT n• •''• MARBERT MOORED J1T M. NOWtE, A. loco/760 1675/49 (6J7 Ac.) r» (I O. 56 AL) 25 Ar_ _47 A.C. MOQRE. ' " 77 .33 A,-) r 1 I I I 100 S 56'2'7';0" E 0 50 too 200 400 33.61 S 64.07-OC 13.2 0' ( 0.0848 ACRES IN FEET HEREBY DEDICATED 1 inch = 100 ft. E FOR R.O.W. • 73'08�� PROPOSED N N 08'58' 12" W 2' WATERLINE 5.01' CAVV ROAD 32' _ =='1�" E S 56'27'20" E PROPOSED \ 1' 18 E 420 �_�� N "13.OB�G..L�� 31. 59' S 614. 99 0C N 84'2 „ 83'S9'39" E _.. _S__ ;:' 25 8 WATERLINE ROAD ZASE. cJ0.00 N _ 107.04 _.j - -- 5' BLDG. --�: PAR PLAT _ — _ — _ -' - I !- 25 G. LINE LINE 10' ROAD WIDENING co ' ! cO EASE YOL 562 PG A4o - LOT 4 W v N 08'5 '1'2" W 25 BLDG. a 10' P.U.E. ti ! o . a I 1.2043 ACRES o 0 O ¢ \ PROPOSED I CV N p 1 1.23 O .a N 84'21 ' 1$" E FIRE HYDRANT ;�_ 5' BLDG. r 0 49.73' i ( LINE 5' BLDG. r o , r LOT 2 ;; i _ 20' BLDG. UNE M .: _ z LOT 1 ` 1.1945 ACRES a S 89'17'57" E 3 1.1931 ACRES ; PROPOSED a k' 5' BLDG. r • I a JJ 266.20' th LINE ` I p 8 WATERLINE O i r- p� o d J rri r i . M 20' BLDG. LINE 3 7 see � cc'10.6 7' r i' S' BLDG. -. 19 5 I' 5' BLDG. LINEbo N 1Y V O 20' BLDG. I O LINE I r i• SLOG LINE `n Z N �879'3j„ 4wE - - ► LOT 4 P.O.B. N 7g• w- 215 49,..E 1 V5 1.1926 ACRES o �> N 05ro7'28' W• �� 1EA NF/V w I N s9 •s 0 ,'^�"�i �l PROPOSED N 1 31 r ►'AcAj•FD IN 1219/ 02 , l ` `C WATERLINE 0.1445 ACRES g9 25' o / HEREBY DEDICATED 01'' ^ N 81:- &; G. U► E S 10.1 i 56 W FOR R.O. W. / �' 76� - 4p 52."_ W 9: 81' ►- / N 81.40'52„ W 8332.20- w I41 / 249.11 ��JN 107 - E ExslnNc G, 6" WATER 10,01, NE / V AS SCAL' YOR2%C j,�jN�, FROM CITY OF � N 101e'42- E • -PE. RGEppT�OWN � 30.11, U M i K,5 M, / SERENAOA 'EAST, UNIT TWO � CARC SLIME 591-399 0 50 100 200 400 ( IN FEET ) VOR7,4 C LAND' 14� ' Feb. 24, 1996 City of Georgetown Development Services Division P.O. Box 409 Georgetown, Tx. 78627 To Whom It May Concern: We, Peter L. and Nancy � S. Zenner, being home owners at 901 Bosque Trail, adjacent to the proposed Hempe Estates located on Cavu Road and Vortac Lane, would like to voice our concerns in writing and at the public meeting being held on Fuesday March 5, 19 Our concerns are that the natural drainage through the acre property not be obstructed by construction on the property or that measures be taken to provide for.thle appropriate drainage so that during heavy rains the water and debris does not back up on our propertv and cause subsequent flooding of our residence. We have, in the past, had running water over the retaining wall behind our house and up to the level of our deck. The natural drainage area for the streets of Cielo and DwPl Prado appear to run through our backyard and througtit tfie; se; 5 acres across C a v u Road. Please take this matter into consideration as you determine the outcome of the request for the subdivision of this land. Sincerely, Peter er Nancy S. Zenner CITY OF GEORGETOWN NOTICE TO SURROUNDING PROPERTY O OF A PUBLIC MEETING Notice is hereby given that the City of Georgetown will hold its regular public meeting of the PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. This meeting will be held on the 2nd day of April 1996, at 6:00 p.m. at its regular meeting place in the Council Chambers, 101 East 7th Street, Georgetown, Texas to consider the proposed: Preliminary Plat of a 5.0142 acre tract in the David Wright Survey, to be known as Hempe Estates, and variances to the Subdivision Regulations, located on Cavu Road and Vortac Lane. As one of the owners of adjacent property you are invited to be present at such meeting if you desire to discuss the proposed plan. See attached Exhibit A for more detail. Date:3/ 18/96 City of' Georgetown A copy of the planning report related to this item will be available at the Division of Development Services and the Georgetown Public, Library no later than the l ciday prior [0 the meeting described above. For further information phone the Development Services Division at 930-3575. PROPERTY OWNER'S COMMENTS Project Name: t Name of Respondent: L L f S Address of Respondent: I am in favor: I object: If you wish to submit written comment, please respond by 3/27/96 , it vvIII be provide d to thet'lanning and Zoning Commission and City Council. Please reply to: co� City of Georgetown Development Services Division P. O. Box 4-09 Georgetown, Texas 78627 Council meeting April 23, 1996 Item No. FIC AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET SUBJECT: Consideration of a Preliminary Plat of a resubdivision of Crystal Knoll Terrace, Unit One, Block 11, Lot 7. ITEM SUMMARY: Crystal Knoll Terrace was platted in 1985, and the required public improvements were installed. However, the subdivision remained vacant until recently. Single family residences are being constructed on the existing lots which were platted for such use. The lot that is the subject of this resubdivision was originally planned for commercial use. It is generally located at the center of the subdivision. The proposal is to resubdivide Lot 7 into eight (8) single family residential lots. All lots exceed the standards for width, depth and size and are consistent with all other design standards for single family residential lots. Since the lot was initially proposed as one (1) commercial tract, the utility facilities for the lot were provided to accommodate that use. At this time, the additional facilities to accommodate the seven additional lots must be provided. The Preliminary Plat includes the proposed utility plan. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: None. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. COMMENTS: At its April 2, 1996, meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 6-0 to approve a Preliminary Plat of a resubdivision of Crystal Knoll Terrace, Unit One, Block 11, Lot 7. Revised plats addressing the Technical Issue have been submitted to the City. RECOMMENDED MOTION: If this item is approved by the City Council, it will be consistent with the Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendation, unless stated otherwise. ATTACHMENTS: Staff report and plat. Submitted Bv. s - Edward J. Barry, AICP - Director Division of Development Services Ze , Hildy L. Kingma, ICP Chief Planner PRELIMINARY PLAT OF A RESUBDIVISION OF CRYSTAL KNOLL TERRACE, UNIT ONE, BLOCK 11, LOT 7. OWNER/APPLICANT: Mr. Stephen D. Bartholomew Main Street Homes 7447 Bee Caves Road, No. 105 Austin, TX 78746 AGENT: Mr. Don Bizzell, P.E. Steger and Bizzell Engineering 1978 South Austin Avenue Georgetown, Texas 78626 863-4521 FAX 863-4523 REQUEST: Preliminary Plat of a resubdivision of Crystal Knoll Terrace, Unit One, Block 11, Lot 7 as recorded in Cabinet G, Slides 384-385 of the Official Plat Records of Williamson County, Texas. FACTS: r Location: Located on Crystal Knoll Boulevard. SEE EXHIBIT A Existing Site: Undeveloped commercial lot. Existing Zoning: This tract is located out of the City so zoning does not apply. Proposed Use: Eight (8) single family residential lots are proposed. Surrounding Uses and Zoning: This tract is surrounded by Crystal Knoll Terrace, Unit One, a single family residential subdivision located out of the City. Century Plan: The Century Plan -Development Plan designates this location as Intensity Level 3. The proposed resubdivision can be accommodated within this intensity designation. SEE EXHIBIT B Notification: The notification process has been completed. Preliminary Plat - Crystal Knoll Terrace, April 18, 1996 Unit One, Block 11, Lot 7 PP 96-14/File: CRYKNOL7.PP Page 1 CM:CS HISTORY: A Final Plat of the Planned Unit Development of Crystal Knoll Terrace, Unit One was approved by City Council on August 16, 1985. SEE EXHIBIT B ANALYSIS: Crystal Knoll Terrace was platted in 1985, and the required public improvements were installed. However, the subdivision remained vacant until recently. Single family residences are being constructed on the existing lots which were platted for such use. The lot that is the subject of this resubdivision was d iginally planned for commercial use. It is generally located at the center of the subdivision. SEE EXHIBIT D The proposal is to resubdivide Lot 7 into eight (8) single family residential lots. All lots exceed the standards for width, depth and size and are consistent with all other design standards for single family residential lots. Since the lot was initially proposed as one (1) commercial tract, the utility facilities for the lot were provided to accommodate that use. At this time, the additional facilities to accommodate the seven additional lots must be provided. The Preliminary Plat includes the proposed utility plan. Technical Issue: The Subdivision Regulations require that the following technical issue is addressed prior to Planning and Zoning Commission consideration of this application. In order to assist the applicant, however, this application has been forwarded to the Planning and Zoning Commission prior to the completion of the technical issue. Therefore, this item must be addressed by April 11, 1996, or the application will be forwarded to the Council with a recommendation for denial. Alternatively, the applicant has the opportunity to request a delay to the City Council's consideration of the application in order to complete the technical issue. 1. The name of the Chairperson of the Planning and Zoning Commission, Leon Douglas, shall be added to the signature block on Page 2. PRIOR TO RECORDING: 1. The creation of eight (8) single family residential lots requires the payment of $1, 800 in park land fees. The fees must be paid before the Preliminary Plat - Crystal Knoll Terrace, Unit One, Block 11, Lot 7 PP 96-14/File: CRYKNOL7.PP CM:CS April 18, 1996 Page 2 Final Plat can be recorded. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of a Preliminary Plat of a resubdivision of Crystal Knoll Terrace, Unit One, Block 11, Lot 7. P & Z ACTION: At its April 2, 1996, meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 6-0 to approve a Preliminary Plat of a resubdivision of Crystal Knoll Terrace, Unit One, Block 11, Lot 7. Preliminary Plat - Crystal Knoll Terrace, Unit One, Block 11, Lot 7 PP 96-14/File: CRYKNOL7.PP CM:CS April 18, 1996 Page 3 EXHIBIT A GEORGETOWN I. S.-D. 2139/ 214 44.01 AC. � PN� JEFFE R SpN EXHIBIT B DETERMINATION OF PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT GIVEN A SINGLE LAND USE 1. 'DATE': March 8, 1996 'PROJECT NAME': Crystal Knoll Terrace, Unit 1, Block 11, Lot 7 Final Plat 2. 'GIVEN' acres of Intensity Level 1 acres of Intensity Level 2 3.09 acres of Intensity Level 3 acres of Intensity Level 4 acres of Intensity Level 5 acres of Intensity Level 6 3.09 TOTAL ACRES 3. ALLOWABLE DEMAND: INTENSITY WATER WASTEWATER TRANSPORTATION �= LEVEL Peak GPD Average GPD Peak Trip Ends --------------------------- 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 11,618 3,337 31 4 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 4. TOTAL ALLOWABLE DEMAND: Maximum GPD Water Capacity: 11,618 Maximum GPD Wastewater Capacity: 3.337 Maximum Trip Ends: 31 5. PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT: (a) (b) (c) (d) POTENTIAL UNITS BY UTILITY MAXIMUM PER DEV DEVELOPMENT LAND USES WATER ------------------------------------------------------------------------- WASTEWATER TRANSPORTATION j -------------------- UNITS j REGS j -----------------j ------------------------------ ALLOWED/UNIT ----------------------------------------- --------- ----- Detached SF Large Lot 10 12 52 10 j 6 6 housing units Average Lot 12 13 3.5 ( 12 22 12 housing units Zero Lot Line 12 �13 35 12 I 30 j 12 housing units Attached SF 18 19 28 18 I 45 j 18 housing units Multifamily 22 21 14 14 j 88 j 14 housing units Mobile Home 18 17 36 17 17 housing units Lodging 61 55 22 22 j j 22 rooms Institutional 33,873 36,274 36,742 33,873 I 33,873 square feet Church -with day care 37,722 40,207 1,986 I 1,986 j I 1,986 square feet -w/o day care 62,465 66,744 42,917 I 42,917 j 42,917 square feet Medical Office 27,929 29.796 9.575 I 9.575 I 9,575 square feet General Office 31,919 36.673 12,118 I 12,118 j 12,118 square feet Retail, Mixed 17,874 20.474 1,871 j 1,871 j 1,871 square feet Retail, Restaurant 7,448 6,953 2.718 2.718 I I 2,718 square feet Retail, Store 35,749 37.923 6,435 6,435 I 6,435 square feet Employment Centers 31,919 36,673 6,753 I 6,753 6,753 square feet Warehouse 203,832 238,371 51,500 I 51,500 51,500 square feet Mini -Warehouse 2,904,600 ---------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 3,337,200 118,846 I j-------------------- 118,846 j j ----------------- j--------------------------------------- 118,846 square feet EXHIBIT C N161o1(?di w 10 v e.l. GPe° EXHIBIT D \ Z \ 3 \\ �\ 4 \ \ 5 \ \ °. 10, \ 09 o rt, 20 S \ •y1• �•' � hp'i' 14 y ^ ' c iyl yet t.; ° r Z• � \ . 0 64r i z,x 4 I 3.09 ACRES < 6y 4r ' COMMERCIAL . i. 65 0� P; 20, 1 K ^ CIS J SITE 3- 5. 6B I �'. i 4Q / , b /7 Nye .9° c, . o- eti eOw vs,.. Jig a t.... ypl �. a�'!Bz.•I �.Z� ., / .., b �•'1' Lets! _ nice `ew/ IOEOCArcO rOrt CITY a'Le i ti ��ld T t - R / 'A+ ••+,P'/ MLIC MIEe rattfT!!1 � e e /, L!'el 7P.rU 3� - = z �> 0 a \ \ 1 Yv 1 1 •.n z II` EN ll at�s , .xu .,a•,• --� -- a••h01 a _- —_ pqS+t � r0i ]a L•rn:i I i ',6e0 a,6'h0't bqY el2f •,p R r[rew t,Cn I i yJ� yi I I I I O J O Z 6 W Z W Y N_ N ¢ J- C, < _ i F ea.s° SS Ta ee to =Jr t0 _ Q< a .- 1 G. 'r' t 5, 1 La 41.004100 e1 st e,00 e,.00 Vm r1 xu "r �' f l e ml v .•fC to n,•• c .", P. ;�^8^ i ?• Coo 8 R J L•aret' t. 8 pg R8 ` ^o _'�a'�-'ZMI e . o E •` a` : j e = o o ! L" /d o f /1 o /d . b "o /l b P. // c /O g 9 oi8 s i I ` om 4 \ JOHN NOYLE �; ^ : 9.. -zsey / IP._r_ %� _�Y : E [ i q�Lon� c ■ z eh ) �' 4Ix• bNO .-L•Y]Se4.. !✓ 4YYb,. �zeY a r • L° [ Iseoe' °":so',L•s,cz wr. :e+, [ wo.,v ^!S 4se•z°'.! c •w. - ^ B e•.s�o; a. r•]e'eY,L•aq e]' 'el' I i ��� & zz•oq•2e.c q•, 4eV zq.1[ xoo•• I O n $ : f ted, L • aL. ✓ASM/NE TRAIL A 0 0 ^ IS ° �� q• _ $ $ $ e 8 $ L7nx l — s� —� _ —d— _ 6— _ = 60a e- Is eo.. cLE'"Ita fm nwlct t0Lw,wo_ _ N! r)37 ,5,• S69°29' 41"W 1105.00 v•qr e',ow.w rare. gi.Lr [q.lr wL. uf,.e tse—� —T IE(+!)2R431 COUNTY ROAO 15_/__ p R i IT i N RAY BARKEROON aECNL£R I OVAWOOp REED TAUSSEL MARROW � M'OIAEL M. UOT IAGE Re•,pELI G SIMMONS I ! I z 616/3 I I s30/Y1 I I a FINAL CRYSTAL mo L TERRACE PLANNED wr DEVELOPMENT -UN/T ONE Council meeting date: 04-23-96 Item No. AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET SUBJECT Consideration of the recommendation of the Council Compensation Committee regarding monthly remuneration to the Mayor and Councilmembers ITEM SUMMARY At the last Council Meeting you appointed a Council Compensation Committee. The committee, composed of Mark Ramos, Billie Schultz, Tom Swift, and Marvin Waley, met on Tuesday, April 16. Marvin Waley was chosen as the Chairman. After reviewing comparison research regarding the remuneration paid by other cities of similar size (copy attached), and after discussion of the obvious time required of the Mayor and Council, it was determined by the Committee that the Mayor's salary should be raised from $250 to $300 and the Councilmembers' salaries should be raised from $100 to $200. ATTACHMENTS 1. Comparison chart showing salaries provided by cities of similar size to Georgetown. Su 0y: 1 1''�- Sandra Lee, City Secretary MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMPENSATION COMPARISON APRIL, 1996 Pop./# of Mayor's Council # of mtgs/ Cif employees Salary Salary month City owned utilities Allen 30,119/160 $ 60/mo. * $ 20/mo. * 2 no Benbrook 25,000/ 81 $ 25/mtg. $ 25/mtg. 2 water, sewer Burleson 17,950/178 $ 5/mtg. $ 5/mtg. 2 water Cleburne 22, 800/260 None None 2 water, sewer La Marque 14,120/106 None None 2 water, sewer Lancaster 22,600/203 None None 2 water, sewer McKinney 32,000/250 $ 10/mtg. $ 10/mtg. 2 water New Braunfels 32,000/260 $150/mo. $100/mo. 2 yes Rosenberg 20,183/170 $300/mo. $200/mo. 2 water, sewer Round Rock 43,895/345 $750/mo. $500/mo. 2 water, sewer San Marcos 34,000/410 None None 2 yes * paid only if they attend the meetings Elgin 57000/ 40 $ 75/mo. $ 50/mo. 2 water, sewer Taylor 11,472/100 $ 4/mo. $ 4/mo. 1 water, sewer Council meeting date: 4-23-96 Item No. AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET SUBJECT Appointments to the 150th Birthday Committee ITEM SUMMARY 150th Birthday Coordinator Marvin Waley is asking for names of the people you would like to appoint to the Birthday Committee. Please be prepared with names so that Marvin can call the committee together to begin planning. ATTACHMENTS None 3u iuect by: Leo Wood, Mayor Co WTI Council Meeting Date. 04/23/96 Item No. AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET SUBJECT Consider appointment of a member to serve on the Convention & Visitors Bureau Board. ITEM SUMMARY The 10-member CVB Board has a vacancy on it which represents the Restaurant/Motel industry. The Mayor is requested to recommend and the Council to approve a representative from a list of submitted eligible applicants. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS None FINANCIAL IMPACT None COMMENTS None ATTACHMENTS None Submitted By: Hartley Sappington, Director of Community Services