HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda_GEDCO_04.03.2000AGENDA FOR MEETING OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TASK FORCE
SCHEDULED TO BE HELD MONDAY, APRIL 3, 2000 AT 5:15 P.M.
IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER AT CITY HALL.
Notice is hereby given that the Economic Development Task Force
established by the Georgetown City Council will hold a Meeting on
Monday, April 3, 2000, at 5:15 p.m, in the City Council Chambers an
the City Hall of Georgetown, Texas t
AGENDA
1. Registration of Attendance for Task Force members.
2. Consideration of projected termination time for meeting.
Review of proposed recommendations.
4. Deliberation and adoption of responses and/or recommendati
to City Council concerning issues. ons
5. Establish and/or confirm Next meeting date, time and agenda.
g a.
6. Adjourn
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
I, Sandra D. Lee, City Secretary for the City of Georgetown Texas,
do hereby certify that this Notice of Meeting was Posted o
bulletin board located outside of the Council Chambers a n the
readily accessible to the general place
day of 2000 atg public at all times on the C` ,"
for at least 72 continuous hou s'C�'and remained so posted
said meeting, preceding the scheduled time of
SANDRA D. LEE, City Secretary
EDr►4.3.ACN(WPBC/1p6)
ORGANIZATION RECOMMENDATIONS
As we consider the recommendations for organizational form for
economic development as required by the charge given us by the City
Council, we believe that any organizational recommendations from
the Task Force must address the following issues:
1. It must be very clear that the needs and desires of the
citizens of our community are defined, assimilated,
accommodated and protected.
2. We must be clear as to how economic development vision, goals,
policies and strategy are set.
3. We must be very clear as to who directs and measure CVB and
E.D. staffs' performances.
4. We must be very clear who sets and approves CVB and E.D.
budgets.
5. We must be certain that economic development decision making
power is adequately distributed.
6. We must be certain that economic development vision, goals,
policies and strategy transcend short term changes in elected
positions.
7. We must be certain that resources, people and money can be
properly administrated.
8. We must be certain that prospects can be handled seamlessly
and efficiently.
9. We must be certain that the proprietary nature of economic
development information can be protected.
10. We must be convinced that E.D. (such as form, public/private
partnership or other) selected is the most effective way to
carry out economic development in our community.
11. We must be convinced that whatever E.D. form is selected will
give CVB the best opportunity to maintain focus.
12. We must be clear in defining boards which oversee CVB or E.D.
as either advisory or governing.
13. We must be convinced that the process for E.D. decision making
is explicit and transparent to our citizens.
So it is with careful deliberation and full consideration for
the above that we make the following organizational
OPERATIONAL ISSUES
Following formalization of public policy regarding economic
development and creation of supporting organizations, it is then
important to insure that E.D.'s performance by staff is properly
directed and monitored. The E.d. Task Force recommends the
following outline be used periodically by the approval of the
governing body to review and assess E.D. staff performance.
1. How well does CVB or E.D. staff perform as a team?
2. Are policies and strategies understood and carried out?
3. Are goals achieved?
4. Are people and money resources properly administered?
5. Are the measurable and acceptable returns on resources spent?
6. Is E.D. information handled professionally?
7. Are E.D. properties handled seamlessly and efficiently?
8. Are communications adequate and timely at all levels and yet
sensitive to proprietary need?
9. Is adequate information developed and communicated when
approvals are sought? Is the proprietary nature of
information protected at all times?
10. Are there ever embarrassing surprises at any level?
11. Is E.D. understood as a long term process and treated
accordingly?
OPE ATWNAL M&WPBc106
POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS
The Task force recommends that the following issues must be
clear policy affirmation and direction by City Council: given
1. There must be a clear, well articulated and broadly
embraced vision of what we want Georgetown to in 5, 10, 15 and 20 years. look like
2. In keeping with 1 above, there must be a clear well
articulated supporting vision for the desired economic
profile of Georgetown and how economic development will
be used to achieve that vision.
3. The City Council must not only enthusiastically support
the actions required to develop the above visions,
it
must also develop or cause to be developed clear strate
to achieve the visions. gy
4. City Council must insure that the public is protected
s
visions and strategies are set. The needs and desires o,
the citizens of the community must be defined
assimilated, accommodated and '
accountability must be assimilated accommodate Public
Protected as well. d and
5. City Council must address and define whether ublic-
private partnership is the most effective way to carry
out economic development or whether there is a better
alternative.
6. Council policy must insure that there are measurable a
nd
acceptable returns on public resources spent for economic
development.
7. Council must clearly define how economic development
goals, policies and strategies are set and how budgets
are established and approved. This must be done in such
a manner as to insure that economic development policies
and strategy transcend short term changes in elected
Positions.
8. Council policy must insure that economic development
is
carried out within a structure that distributes decision
making power in such a manner as to preclude s ecial
interest control. P
POLICY-RW-WPEC 1 od
FINAL REPORT (PROPOSED OUTLINE)
*Introduction - Charge by Council and Executive Summar
y
•Task Force Members (name & occupation) (See Tab Section A)
*Structure for this Report
•Task Force Actions
*Minutes of Meetings (See Tab Section B for Copies)
•Interviews with other Cities (See Tab SectionC for
report)
*Policy Issues/Recommendations
•Organizational_Issues/Recommendations
-Operational Issues/Recommendations
*Summary and Conclusions
MA--REP-wPWj0d
NOTES OF THE MEETING
OF THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TASK FORCE
THURSDAY, MARCH 23, 2000
Bill Connor called the meeting to order at 5.16 p.m. in the Georgetown City Council
Chamber. Sixteen of the twenty-two members of the Task Force were in attendance,
thus constituting a quorum.
Connor asked the members for input on the Policy, Operational, and Organizational
Issues as compiled by he and Co -Chair Don Collier. He asked them to determine which
of the proposed issues should be kept on the list.
Connor told members they would receive a revised list of issues to review in preparation
for the recommendation to the Council.
It was determined that the next meeting would be held in the Council Chamber on
Monday, April 3, 2000, at 5:15 p.m.
The meeting was adjourned by 6:30 p.m.
sl
f?Ccoq AGENDA PAC-'-�T
- Or APM 3, 2-ouo PIT6,
11
W. H. CONNOR
Attorney at Law
Bank o rica B ' ' g
624 S. Austin Ave., Suite 101
Georgetown, Texas 78626
Telephone: 5121863-45 76
Telecopier. 5121869-3496
March 30, 2000
Economic Development Task Force Members
Georgetown, Texas
Greetings:
We have a scheduled meeting for Monday, April 3, 2000 at 5:15 p.m. in
the City Council Chamber for the City of Georgetown. It is my
objective for the Task Force to confirm and adopt recommendations in
the three general categories. Then the Task Force needs to draft a
set of general response recommendations to the City Council. Don
Collier and I have prepared the enclosed draft of recommendations in
the three categorized areas (policy, organization and operation).
These are of course subject to the Task Force as a whole accepting,
modifying or rejecting them. I ask that you review these proposed
recommendations so that we can be prepared to move forward in a
knowledgeable and organized manner at the meeting.
In order to enable us to have a common understanding of the meaning of
words such as vision, goals, objectives and similar terms, we will try
to have a set of definitions which we can adopt available for you at
the meeting. That way we are all operating with the same
understanding of the terminology we are using.
Thank you. I look forward to seeing you at the meeting on the third.
Very truly yours,
A�f - - —r
W. H. CONNOR
WHC/kog
IDTF4-3.LTR-2D4