HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes_P&Z_01.16.2024Minutes of the
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of Georgetown, Texas
Tuesday, January 16, 2024
The Georgetown Planning and Zoning Commission met on Tuesday, January 16, 2024 at 6:00 PM at
Council and Court Building, 510 W. 9th Street.
The City of Georgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If
you require assistance in participating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the ADA,
reasonable assistance, adaptations, or accommodations will be provided upon request. Please contact
the City Secretary's Office, at least three (3) days prior to the scheduled meeting date, at (512) 930-3652
or City Hall at 808 Martin Luther King, Jr Street for additional information; TTY users route through Relay
Texas at 711.
The following Members were in attendance:
Present were: Shelley G G Rodocker, Scott A Allen, Michael L Price, Stephen F Dickey, Pierce
P Macguire, Alice L York
Agenda Notice
Public Wishing to Address an Advisory Board
On a subject that is posted on this agenda: Please fill out a speaker registra on form which can be found on the
table at the entrance to the mee ng room. Clearly print your name and the le er of the item on which you wish to
speak and present it to the Board Liaison prior to the start of the mee ng. You will be called forward to speak
when the Board considers that item. Only persons who have delivered the speaker form prior to the mee ng being
called to order may speak. Speakers will be allowed up to three minutes to speak. If you wish to speak for six
minutes, it is permissible to use another requestor's granted me to speak. No more than six minutes for a speaker
may be granted. The requestor gran ng me to another speaker must also submit a form and be present at the
meeting.
On a subject not posted on the agenda: A request must be received by the Advisory Board or Commission Liaison
prior to the day the agenda for this mee ng is posted. Each speaker will be given three minutes to address the
Board or Commission members. No action can be taken at this meeting.
Call to Order
Pledge of Allegiance
from the Chair
Announcements
Action from Executive Session
1. Statutory Consent Agenda
The Statutory Consent Agenda includes non -controversial and routine items that may be acted upon
with one single vote. An item may be pulled from the Consent Agenda in order that it be discussed and
acted upon individually as part of the Regular Session.
1.A Meeting Minutes
Consideration and possible action to approve the minutes from the January 2, 2024
regular meeting of the Planning & Zoning Commission -- Erica Metress, Planning
Specialist
Moved by Scott A Allen; seconded by Shelley G G Rodocker to Approve .
Motion Approved: 6- 0
Voting For: Scott A Allen, Michael L Price, Stephen F Dickey, Pierce P Macguire,
Shelley G G Rodocker, Alice L York
Voting Against: None
At the Chairman's discretion the agenda items were reordered as such: 2.E, 2.F, 2.G, 2.A,
2.B, 2.C, 2.D, 2.H
2. Regular Session
2.A Unified Development Code Executive Amendment - Future Mobility Plan
Public hearing and possible recommendation to City Council on proposed amendments to
the following chapters of the Unified Development Code (UDC): Chapters 3, 5, 12 and 16
to incorporate the recently approved Future Mobility Plan -- Nat Waggoner, Transportation
Coordinator
Nat Waggoner presented the staff report.
Commissioner Allen referred to Chapter 12 of the Unified Development Code and its
notation that bicycle lanes are to be combined with sidewalks into a sidepath.
Commissioner Allen further questioned who has the right of way in the sidepaths.
Waggoner clarified that the sidepath would be still in the city right of way and
acknowledged that the new term "shared use path" is found in the city's parks and
recreation.
Alternate Commissioner York questioned the purpose in changes that were made in the
widths found in Table 12.02.030: Comprehensive Plan Street and Trail Standards.
Waggoner noted that 11-foot lanes are sufficient for traveling lanes and clarified that the
purpose of the change was to match the arterial and collector level lane widths. Waggoner
further clarified that the median is not included in the measurements of roadway due to the
inclusion of it causing confusion.
Chair Dickey opened and closed the public hearing with no speakers coming forth.
Moved by Scott A Allen; seconded by Michael L Price to Approve as presented.
Motion Approved: 6- 0
Voting For: Scott A Allen, Michael L Price, Stephen F Dickey, Pierce P Macguire,
Shelley G G Rodocker, Alice L York
Voting Against: None
2.B 2023-9-ANX 3101 Development
Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Zoning Map Amendment to zone,
upon annexation, Lot 1, Block B of the Davis Subdivision to the General Commercial (C-
3) zoning district for the property generally located at 3101 West State Highway 29
(2023-9-ANX) -- Ryan Clark, AICP, Senior Planner
Sofia Nelson presented the staff report on Ryan Clark's behalf.
Ricca Keepers, Applicant, approached the podium to address the Commission and
highlighted that the goal is to annex and request for C3 zoning. Keepers continued to
clarify that the specific land use would be an office flex space with two buildings for
retail and restaurant. Keepers noted that the office flex space is considered a
warehouse but will not look like a warehouse with variation between stone, brick, and
metal. Keepers acknowledged that the use would support local businesses that need
more space.
Chair Dickey opened and closed the public hearing with no speakers coming forth.
Moved by Stephen F Dickey; seconded by Shelley G G Rodocker to Approve as
presented.
Motion Approved: 5- 1
Voting For: Michael L Price, Stephen F Dickey, Pierce P Macguire, Shelley G G
Rodocker, Alice L York
Voting Against: Scott A Allen
2.0 2023-2-PUDA (PUD Amendment - Southwestern University)
Public Hearing and possible recommendation on a request for a zoning map
amendment to amend the Southwestern University PUD which consists of
approximately 705.32 acres to amend 0.5 acres of the project from Residential Single
Family (RS) to Neighborhood Commercial (CN), for the property addressed at 1205
Maple Street bearing the legal description of .5 acres out of the Snyder Addition, Block
7(PT) (2023-2-PUD) -- Maddison O'Kelley, Preservation and Redevelopment Manager
Commissioner MacGuire recused himself at 7:57 PM.
Maddison O'Kelley presented the staff report.
Chair Dickey asked if the proposed restaurant would be available to the public. O'Kelley
confirmed that the restaurant would be available to the public.
Commissioner Allen asked if there would be a corresponding 6-foot privacy fence on the
East side of the property. O'Kelley clarified that there would not be a 6-foot privacy fence
on the East side of the property because there is a bed and breakfast there whereas the
South side is next to a residential property.
Commissioner Allen noted that there is no indicator of a request in changing the
building height requirement for this PUD and asked for the building height
requirement. O'Kelley believed that the request would have to adhere to CN based
zoning district because the PUD does outline building height maximum specific for
certain facilities.
Alternate Commissioner Rodocker referred to the UDC requirement that the gross floor
area shall not exceed 2,500 square feet and the proposed amendment to the gross floor
area of 3,750 square feet. Alternate Commissioner Rodocker asked for clarification on
whether the proposition complies, partially complies, or does not comply with the approval
criteria. O'Kelley highlighted that the concept plan as proposed reflects the amount of
parking for a 3,750 square foot area. O'Kelley added that the Southwestern PUD includes
a parking strategy for the area which is also a more walkable area than what is typical.
Chair Dickey questioned if there is a request for a drive thru facility. O'Kelley
established that there is no request for a drive thru and that the drive thru would be a
separate land use category.
Chair Dickey opened the public hearing.
Danni Babik, 1008 E University Avenue, approached the podium to address the
Commission and established that she owns and lives at the bed and breakfast to the
East of the property. Babik clarified that the bed and breakfast provides a historic
ambiance and personal hospitality for guests. Babik noted that she and her husband
have been aware of the plans next door and support this use but have specific concerns
with the parking lot being adjacent to the East side of their building and private backyard.
Babik added that they are concerned about lighting, noise, location of the dumpster,
entrance, and height of the proposed building. Babik expressed that she would like to
have the opportunity to address those concerns.
Chair Dickey closed the public hearing.
Moved by Michael L Price; seconded by Scott A Allen to Approve as presented.
Commissioner Allen asked if conditions can be placed with the motion.
Travis Baird approached the podium to address the Commission and noted that with
an SUP you can add conditions with a motion, but not with a PUD. Baird added that
with a PUD the Commission can communicate any concerns to council and the
applicant.
Chair Dickey requested communication between the applicant and adjacent neighbor
on hours of operation and lighting. Chair Dickey asked if the height for CN is 35 feet.
O'Kelley confirmed that the height for CN is 35 feet and added that the applicant has
expressed for a single -story restaurant. O'Kelley established that the property would be
subject to nuisance standards relative to noise, lighting, and so on.
Motion Approved: 5- 0
Voting For: Scott A Allen, Michael L Price, Stephen F Dickey, Shelley G G Rodocker,
Alice L York
Voting Against: None
2.D 2023-17-REZ 400 CR 152 Multifamily Development
Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Zoning Map Amendment to rezone
1.96 acres of land out of the John Berry Survey, Abstract No. 51, from the Agriculture
(AG) zoning district to the Low Density Multifamily (MF-1) zoning district, for the property
located at 400 County Road 152, Georgetown, Texas (2023-17-REZ) -- Colin Davidson,
Planner
Commissioner MacGuire returns and Commissioner Price leaves at 8:23 PM.
Colin Davidson presented the staff report.
Chair Dickey asked if the applicant's request is for a single lot plat. Davidson confirmed
that the applicant stated that they intend to plat the property as one lot.
Commissioner Allen questioned if alternate zones were offered to the applicant.
Davidson confirmed that the applicant was provided the suggestion of the townhome or
two-family district, but instead proceeded with MF-1.
David Samuelson, Applicant, approached the podium to address the Commission and
noted that the property in question was submitted for a pre -application review in
October 2022 and was in review for townhomes, but the owners did not want 18 lots
and preferred the two-story units like apartment building with individual access and
garages. Samuelson summarized that the owner hopes to have 1 lot with rentable
units.
Commissioner Allen commented that the density is too much for the property and agreed
with the flow of transitioning into a residential district. Commissioner Allen continued to
add that he has concerns on traffic as well. Samuelson responded that the density and
traffic increase would not be different with 18 units for an apartment complex versus and
18 townhomes.
Alternate Commissioner York questioned how the applicant would address the access
points and streets in the future. Samuelson noted that they initially had the driveway
access in the center of the property, but after further review, the planning staff
recommended in aligning the driveway with Stadium Drive. Samuelson highlighted that
they surveyed the County Road 152 from Stadium Drive to Iris Drive and noted that they
are ready to respond to requirements of widening the right of way.
Chair Dickey opened the public hearing.
Todd Shaw, 900 Stadium Drive, approached the podium to address the Commission and
commented that the concept plan strengthens his objection with the proposed
development. Shaw believed that the proposal is out of scale and scope with the
neighborhood and highlighted that the neighborhood consists of single -story homes with
families who would be adversely affected because of difficult traffic patterns. Shaw
continued to note that development is expected but he would like the residents to be
included in planning of the existing neighborhood.
Chair Dickey closed the public hearing.
Moved by Scott A Allen; seconded by Pierce P Macguire to Deny the zoning map
amendment.
Motion Approved: 5- 0
Voting For: Scott A Allen, Stephen F Dickey, Pierce P Macguire, Shelley G G
Rodocker, Alice L York
Voting Against: None
2.E 2023-14-WAV Brady Tract Preliminary Plat
Public Hearing and possible action on a Subdivision Variance from the required number
of street network connections to major streets and the number of vehicle trips onto
existing local streets pursuant to Section 12.05.010.A and Section 12.03.030 of the
Unified Development Code, for the property generally located at 2755 Rockride Lane,
Georgetown, Texas 78626, bearing the legal description of a 34.197-acre tract, located in
the William Addison Survey, Abstract No. 21 in Williamson County (2023-14-WAV) --
Caleb Fuhrer, Assistant Systems Engineering Director
Caleb Fuhrer presented the staff report.
AC Steadman, Applicant, approached the podium to address the Commission and used a
PowerPoint presentation to display the proposal. Steadman highlighted that the property
is landlocked which causes a reliance on neighbors for right of way access. Steadman
noted that they annexed and zoned the property site in January 2022 and submitted the
preliminary plat about a couple of months ago. Steadman explained that they are building
half of Ridgeline Boulevard's 94 foot right away as per code requirements. Steadman
highlighted that there will be two right of way connections through Patterson Ranch to the
south. Steadman spoke about phases of development with the neighboring properties,
the Honeycutt Tract, Maven Tract, and Patterson Ranch. Steadman clarified that the
reason for the variance is because they would be able to meet the requirement of 3
connections to major streets due to the timing of the developments around the property.
Steadman noted that the property will have a total of 6 connections with two connections
to Patterson Ranch, a connection to the east, a connection to the west, and two
connections to Ridge Line Boulevard.
Chair Dickey questioned if Ridge Line Boulevard is a major collector. Travis Baird,
Assistant Planning Director, approached the podium to address the Commission and
commented that he believes Ridge Line Boulevard is a collector level right of way in
Future Mobility Plan.
Chair Dickey opened the public hearing.
Phani Nandyala, 2763 Rockride Lane, approached the podium to address the
Commission and commented that he objects to proposal because it is missing the road
connection for the Maven subdivision. Nandyala further clarified that the Maven
subdivision is blocked three ways so that people cannot leave except through one road
that is available. Nandyala referred to his public comment sent through email, requesting
two engineers to review the plan.
Chair Dickey closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Allen asked for the conditions in which a variance is not needed. Fuhrer
stated that the applicant could phase their preliminary plat.
Commissioner Price shared insight stating that Sam Houston Avenue is a 2-lane road
with stop signs at Bell Gin Road and Rockride Lane. Commissioner Price continued to
explain that traffic accumulates significantly due to the presence of two elementary
schools in the vicinity and emphasized the challenging situation.
Moved by Michael L Price; seconded by Scott A Allen to Deny.
Motion Approved: 6- 0
Voting For: Scott A Allen, Michael L Price, Stephen F Dickey, Pierce P Macguire,
Shelley G G Rodocker, Alice L York
Voting Against: None
2.F 2023-16-WAV East View Terrace
Public Hearing and possible action on a Subdivision Variance for the utilization of a street
stub as access to an adjoining lot pursuant to Section 12.05.010.C.5 of the Unified
Development Code, for the property generally located at 4250 E. University Ave.,
Georgetown, Texas 78626, bearing the legal description of a 151.42-acre tract, located in
the Woodruff Stubblefield Survey, Abstract No. A-556 in Williamson County (2023-16-
WAV) -- Caleb Fuhrer, Assistant Systems Engineering Director
Caleb Fuhrer presented the staff report.
Commissioner Price requested for clarification on how a few structures to south of the
proposed Arches Avenue would be affected by the request. Fuhrer shared that he would
like that applicant to answer that question. Chair Dickey requested that the applicant wait
to approach the podium and asked if their additional questions from the dais for Fuhrer.
Commissioner Allen questioned if this variance is only for ranch gate and continued to
inquire about any requirements needed to pursue the request without a variance. Fuhrer
established that the applicant would have to access Pace Bend Lane instead of the
proposed Arches Avenue.
Travis Baird, Assistant Planning Director, approached the podium to address the
Commission and established that the purpose of the code is to ensure continuity of
roadway extensions, so that private driveways cannot connect to the street stub.
Daniel Hart, Applicant, approached the podium to address the Commission and clarified
that there are three owners that are currently accessing the existing gravel road at the
stub. The Zbeda property owner would like to maintain access at the stub in question for
the variance, while the other two property owners would access via Pace Bend Lane.
Alternate Commissioner Rodocker questioned if the barricade is a permanent structure.
Hart answered that it will remain until Pace Bend Lane is extended_
Chair Dickey opened and closed the public hearing with no speakers coming forth.
Moved by Stephen F Dickey; seconded by Scott A Allen to Approve as requested in
finding that the variance request meets criteria that the granting of the variance will not
be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or injurious to other property in
the area or to the City in administering this Code, that the granting of the variance
would not substantially conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and the purposes of this
Code, that the conditions that create the need for the variance do not generally apply to
other property in the vicinity, and where literal enforcement of these regulations would
result in an unnecessary hardship..
Motion Approved: 6- 0
Voting For: Scott A Allen, Michael L Price, Stephen F Dickey, Pierce P Macguire,
Shelley G G Rodocker, Alice L York
Voting Against: None
2.G 2023-17-WAV Greenhaven Subdivision
Public Hearing and possible action on a Subdivision Variance from non-residential
driveway spacing pursuant to Section 12.08.020 of the Unified Development Code, for the
property generally located at 816 Booty's Crossing Road, Georgetown, Texas 78628,
bearing the legal description of a 4.581-acre tract, located in the David Wright Survey,
Abstract No. 13, and being all of lot 19, block 1, of the San Gabriel Estates Subdivision in
Williamson County (2023-17-WAV) -- Caleb Fuhrer, Assistant Systems Engineering
Director
Caleb Fuhrer presented the staff report.
Commissioner Allen questioned when there would be a threshold in reviewing speed on
Bootys Crossing Road due to future developments emerging and ensuring that the
requirements are considered without a variance. Fuhrer established that the inquiry ties
back to the Capital Improvement Plan that is reviewed in the next five years with the
opinions of consultants. Fuhrer spoke about improvements for Bootys Crossing Road and
Williams Drive and noted that there will be adjustments to the signals. Fuhrer clarified that
this development would dedicate 14 feet of right of way that would allow the city to make
improvements without having to go through costly land acquisition.
Jonathan McNamara, Applicant, approached the podium to address the Commission
and informed them that he is available to answer questions.
Alternate Commissioner York questioned the location of the sidewalks. McNamara
established the sidewalks would be along the entire frontage road as well as
throughout the neighborhood.
Chair Dickey opened the public hearing.
Karen Huffman, 101 Snapper Cove, approached the podium to address the Commission
and requested that they do not allow another subdivision to use Bootys Crossing Road
until roads are widened, repaired and the intersection is made usable. Huffman
highlighted that there are over 10 subdivisions, five businesses, two shopping plazas, a
church, and a park along Bootys Crossing Road. Huffman continued to note that the new
configuration at Bootys Crossing Road and Williams Drive intersection causes traffic to
build up. Huffman further highlighted that the road is in bad shape with eroding pavement
and potholes. Huffman ended with a plea to the Commission to consider what was
mentioned before allowing more developments to use Bootys Crossing Road.
Jeff Nors, 2807 Gabriel View Drive, approached the podium to address the Commission
and commented that he has two properties that would be affected by this request. Nors
shared his concern regarding the new intersection at Bootys Crossing Road and Williams
Drive as it backs up regularly due to short term lane and would increase the amount of
traffic. Nors continued to share his concern of enhanced traffic on Gabriel View Drive as it
is used by people who try to bypass Williams Drive. Nors highlighted
that sidewalks will be present for only a portion of Bootys Crossing Road. Nors
requested that the Commission, at a minimum, postpone the request.
Rob Rothenberg, 2702 Springwood Lane, approached the podium to address the
Commission and noted that he did not receive notice of the request. Rothenberg added
the traffic on Bootys Crossing Road is terrible and that it is very difficult to leave the
subdivision. Rothenberg shared that he thinks that the area would be efficient with less
dense housing.
Chair Dickey closed the public hearing.
Alternate Commissioner York questioned if the number of connectors and lots have
been reviewed for this request.
Travis Baird, Assistant Planning Director, approached the podium to address the
Commission and confirmed that the Planning staff should have reviewed or currently
reviewing the connectors and lots with the preliminary plat.
Commissioner Allen asked for the conditions in which this variance would not be
required to develop the property. Fuhrer confirmed that there is not an instance
where a variance would not be required given the restraints of the proximity of the
surrounding driveways and the posted speed of the subject access road.
Moved by Michael L Price; seconded by Alice L York to Deny
Discussion on dais between Commissioner Price and Chair Dickey.
Alternate Commissioner Rodocker asked if there was a driveway on the property. Chair
Dickey acknowledged that there is a residential driveway.
Discussions on dais about the speed limit between Commissioner Allen, Chair Dickey,
and Commissioner Price.
Motion Approved: 4- 2
Voting For: Michael L Price, Pierce P Macguire, Shelley G G Rodocker, Alice L York
Voting Against: Scott A Allen, Stephen F Dickey
2.H Discussion Items
Updates, Commissioner questions, and announcements -- Travis Baird, Assistant
Planning Director
Chair Dickey shared that he and Sofia are discussing possible training in February for
the Commission.
Travis Baird requested that the Commissioners send him an email if they would like
staff to be specific in their training and noted that there will be a UDC Steering
Committee meeting on January 25th.
3. Executive Session
In compliance with the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, Vernon's Codes,
Annotated, the items listed below will be discussed in closed session and are subject to action in the
regular session.
Adjournment
These minutes were approved at the meeting of
i
air
' r
.-Attest