Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda_ZBA_10.21.2014Notice of Meeting for the Zoning Board of Adjustment of the City of Georgetown October 21, 2014 at 5:00 PM at Council Chambers, 101 East 7th Street, Georgetown, TX The City of Georgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If you require assistance in participating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the ADA, reasonable assistance, adaptations, or accommodations will be provided upon request. Please contact the City at least four (4) days prior to the scheduled meeting date, at (512) 930-3652 or City Hall at 113 East 8th Street for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. Public Wishing to Address the Board On a subject that is posted on this agenda: Please fill out a speaker registration form which can be found at the Board meeting. Clearly print your name, the letter of the item on which you wish to speak, and present it to the Staff Liaison, preferably prior to the start of the meeting. You will be called forward to speak when the Board considers that item. On a subject not posted on the agenda: Persons may add an item to a future Board agenda by filing a written request with the Staff Liaison no later than one week prior to the Board meeting. The request must include the speaker's name and the specific topic to be addressed with sufficient information to inform the board and the public. For Board Liaison contact information, please logon to http://government.georgetown.org/category/boards-commissions/. A As of the deadline, no persons were signed up to speak on items other than what was posted on the agenda. Legislative Regular Agenda B Call to Order Pledge of Allegiance Comments from the Chair - Welcome and Meeting Procedures Action from Executive Session C Election of Vice-chair and Secretary for the 2014-2015 Zoning Board of Adjustment. D Consideration and possible action of the Minutes from the April 16, 2013, Zoning Board of Adjustment meeting. E Introduction to the Zoning Board of Adjustment - Valerie Kreger, Principal Planner F Public Hearing and possible action on a Special Exception for Setback Modification to allow for construction of an accessory structure at Dimmitt Addition, Block 90 (PT), 0.1652 acres, located at 913 South Walnut Street. G Public Hearing and possible action on a Special Exception for expansion of a nonconforming structure at Fleager Addition, Block 1, Lots 7-20 & 22, located at 723 West University Avenue. Adjournment CERTIFICATE OF POSTING I, Jessica Brettle, City Secretary for the City of Georgetown, Texas, do hereby certify that this Notice of Meeting was posted at City Hall, 113 E. 8th Street, a place readily accessible to the general public at all times, on the ______ day of __________________, 2014, at __________, and remained so posted for at least 72 continuous hours preceding the scheduled time of said meeting. ____________________________________ Jessica Brettle, City Secretary City of Georgetown, Texas SUBJECT: Election of Vice-chair and Secretary for the 2014-2015 Zoning Board of Adjustment. ITEM SUMMARY: Election of Vice-chair and Secretary for the 2014-2015 Zoning Board of Adjustment. FINANCIAL IMPACT: NA SUBMITTED BY: City of Georgetown, Texas SUBJECT: Consideration and possible action of the Minutes from the April 16, 2013, Zoning Board of Adjustment meeting. ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: NA SUBMITTED BY: City of Georgetown, Texas SUBJECT: Introduction to the Zoning Board of Adjustment - Valerie Kreger, Principal Planner ITEM SUMMARY: An overview of the Zoning Board of Adjustment powers and duties. FINANCIAL IMPACT: NA SUBMITTED BY: Stephanie McNickle, Recording Secretary City of Georgetown, Texas SUBJECT: Public Hearing and possible action on a Special Exception for Setback Modification to allow for construction of an accessory structure at Dimmitt Addition, Block 90 (PT), 0.1652 acres, located at 913 South Walnut Street. ITEM SUMMARY: The applicant is requesting a Special Exception to allow a setback modification from the required 20 foot side setback and 10 foot rear setback to construct a 677 square foot accessory structure, within 1 foot of the rear and 5 feet on the side property lines, replacing a previous structure. The proposed two story accessory structure includes a 432 square foot garage on the first floor, with a 245 square foot play room on the second floor. Staff recommends approval of SE-2014-001 based upon the review criteria of UDC Section 4.09.040. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The applicant paid the required fees. SUBMITTED BY: Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner ATTACHMENTS: Description Type SE-2014-001 Exhibit 1 Backup Material SE-2014-001 Exhibit 2 - Plan Review Backup Material SE-2014-001 Exhibit 3 - Public Comment Letters Backup Material SE-2014-001 Staff Report Backup Material PINE STWALNUT ST E 8 T H S T E 11TH ST S COLLEGE ST E 10TH ST E 9TH 1/2 ST E 9 T H S T SE-2014-001 SE-2014-001 Exhibit #1 Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only 0 250 500Feet ¯ LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ E University Ave S College St Site City Limits Street Site ³ PINE STWALNUT ST E 8 T H S T E 11TH ST S COLLEGE ST E 10TH ST E 9TH 1/2 ST E 9 T H S T SE-2014-001 SE-2014-001 Exhibit #1 Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only 0 250 500Feet ¯ LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ E University Ave S College St Site City Limits Street Site ³ SE-2014-001WALNUT STS COLLEGE ST E 10TH ST E 11TH ST PINE ST E 9TH 1/2 ST E 8 T H S T E 9 T H S T LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only ¯ 0 200 400Feet Exhibit #4SE-2014-001 S College St Site City Limits Street Site ³ E UniversityAve My name is John Lawton, new owner of Green Earth Builders LLC. I have operated in Georgetown and surrounding area for over thirty five years. when I started the project at 9L3 walnut I found that the entire shed had rotted into the ground at least 6inches. There was no bottom ptate and the studs were rotted and termite damaged up another 5 Inches. Taking the structure down was a slow process for safety reasons' I had the wall up by itself. lthen proceeded to take the tin off with understanding that the rust and holes in the tin were a produce that needed to be extracted and did so. The carport only had three 2" X 4"s running to 4'X 4" post which I had to extract because of setback from 9 % st' when I took the tin off of the shed it had mold and water damage as well as termite damage across 80 percent of the siding. The siding had a paper like quality and all nails were exposed. There was about L6" of space between our shed and the neighbors shed which had a rack for storing wood built on the overhand of the shed. My guys were brushing against the wall with rusty nails so, I dropped the wall for safety' we took the siding off and put the wail back but started thinking about my foundation guys and they wouldn't have room to work. Nor would they be able to trench out my special depth footing needed forthis area. lslid the walloverto pourthe slab. Looking back in hind sight lknow I should have contacted Jeff or Matt from taking the tin off to moving the wall. I have taken over a company which is something I have been working towards my whole life. I have been overwhelmed with the business side of a company that when I came to dealing with the city for permits and the entire process I blanked' I am a carpenter out right and learning the best I can on the business part, growing each day' I hired my daughter to help with the process and making it possible for me to move forward for work' I have never made any bad decisions in my 35 years and to make the mistake like I did is very outofcharacterforme' lhaveanA+gradeforqualityofworksecondtonone. lhavealwaysgivenmy client above standard structural materials. I upgrade on all member and over engineer all footings and piers' My clients know me to be honest and fair. I come to you today with the hope that you understand that I meant only the best product for my client and the safety of my crew. I made the worst decisions of my life consecutively' I promise I learned from my mistake and I hope that you would have the leniency not to punish the home owner for my mistakes. My whole life I have always made decisions dealing with any type of trouble shooting. I am learning to change throughout this process. I pran to be working in the Georgetown area for ten rnore years if god willing. t have three jobs in old town in the works as of today' I never meant for this to happen and for me to be negligent in my actions. This is not me or my work ethic' I pray that you can have the compassion and let me proceed with the project. Thank you for your time, John LaMon 913 South Walnut Accessory Building DemoliƟon Google Street View photos 913 South Walnut Accessory Building DemoliƟon Post demoliƟon photos GIS Aerial of property 602'-31/2' 16'_0" 7',-8 1i2" (Dc) ON Cn ]!t\)o f\)a A \ (N N (\ \.^1- N\ oo a\ Qo 9t ail ilA. i{(D. i: !,bq-) -\ Cd-::x:c-\:o ,R8<b v=ov @a TI cD-5o 16',-0' o ro x: . g'rg 12 " 8'rg a3\l ro rr) ii f 'E' I; s& * 't ? .t __ffi'{)sA"*^aa,.tc - tA6^^r{Ac^/ ? +" g[lvs lb"O.C-, 1o"6*n qT L t+" !f..1sutAt/b^ll- 3/+osoar.oo\i r^r.d.rfu,l th)'>ryvaU- Ard :tu> s isr4"+lef'+2?^\L f.kR$ t'{u-r th' l3' SeolD F16oC, 5:ro€lA€ l{Ev cox5TaucTrc>q EAsr 6111-1_ v$ (-tr -rb Ba reKr* \ ,o.tlc o" serg*; FRom Sreie; exntrrue Gr**<eE'+:'rbeAq€ BsrqlAlt_ a-fg:w-   Georgetown Planning and Development Department  Zoning Board of Adjustment Staff Report  SE‐2014‐001 913 South Walnut Street Special Exception Page 1 of 5  Meeting Date:  October 21, 2014   File No:  SE‐2014‐001  Project Planner:  Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner  Report Date:  September 2, 2014  Relevant UDC Section:  4.09  Staff Recommendation:  Approval of the proposed project as presented   Item Description  Public Hearing and possible action on a Special Exception for Setback Modification to allow for  construction of an accessory structure at Dimmitt Addition, Block 90 (PT), 0.1652 acres, located at  913 South Walnut Street.  Item Details  Project Name: 913 South Walnut Street Accessory Building  Project Address: 913 South Walnut Street  Location: Southeast corner of 9 ½ and Walnut Streets  Legal Description: Dimmitt Addition, Block 90 (PT), 0.1652 acres  Zoning: RS, Residential Single‐Family  Future Land Use: Moderate Density Residential    Applicant/Owner: John Lawton, Green Earth Builders for James Bray and Kendall Britt  Contacts: John Lawton, Green Earth Builders    The applicant is requesting Special Exception approval for a side and rear setback modification  from the Zoning Board of Adjustment (ZBA) to construct a 677 square foot accessory structure,  replacing a previous structure. The proposed two story accessory structure includes a 432 square  foot garage on the first floor, with a 245 square foot play room on the second floor.   Background  On March 27, 2014 the applicant met with city staff to discuss the proposed project at 913 South  Walnut Street. The applicant indicated at the meeting and on the Pre Application Meeting  Request that the existing accessory structures would be remodeled to create the new structure.  The project included the expansion of the current accessory buildings to build out the garage and  add a second story playroom. The applicant was notified that the current buildings were located  within the side and rear setbacks and any demolition required approval of a Certificate of Design  Compliance.   The applicant seeks to replace a previously demolished structure with a new structure located  within the setback. The new structure will occupy the same footprint as the previous structure,    Zoning Board of Adjustment Staff Report  SE‐2014‐001 913 South Walnut Street Special Exception Page 2 of 5  requiring the approval of a setback modification from ZBA.     The demolition of the two accessory structures resulted in the loss of the legal non‐conforming  status, requiring any new construction to meet the current requirements of the Residential Single  Family (RS) zoning district. Per Unified Development Code (UDC) Section 6.03.050.A,  Residential Single‐Family District Lot and Dimensional Standards, the rear setback shall be a  minimum of 10 feet and the side setback shall be a minimum of 20 feet for properties taking  driveway access from a side street. The proposed construction and new foundation is located  within both the side and the rear setbacks.     Due to the encroachment into the rear and side setbacks, a Special Exception for Setback  Modification must be approved by the Zoning Board of Adjustment in order for the construction  of the proposed accessory structure to be permitted.  Per UDC Section 3.15.B, the ZBA shall have  the authority to hear and decide certain authorized Special Exceptions to the terms of the Code.     Authorization/Review Criteria  Section 3.15.040, Criteria for Special Exception Review, allows for request of a Special Exception  for residential setback modifications pursuant to Section 4.09.040.B, Special Exception for Setback  Modification, and 6.06.010.D, detailed above.    The ZBA shall base a decision to allow setback modification on review of the factors included in  Section 4.09.040.B and the site’s specific circumstances.  The Board shall consider the following  criteria and standards in determining whether to grant a Special Exception for setback  modification:    1. If the proposed setback modification is solely a matter of convenience, no Special  Exception shall be granted.  2. If there is adequate room on the site to allow the proposed addition or new structure  without obtaining a Special Exception, no Special Exception shall be granted.  3. The fact that a property may be utilized more profitably if a Special Exception is granted  shall not be considered a sufficient basis for granting a Special Exception.  4. Whether, if the Special Exception is granted:  a. The proposed setback modification is compatible and in context within the block in  which the subject property is located.  b. The existing building envelope, including the main structure and any accessory  structures, occupied the site in the past year.  c. The existing structure is being replaced with new construction that meets the same    Zoning Board of Adjustment Staff Report  SE‐2014‐001 913 South Walnut Street Special Exception Page 3 of 5  dimensions and standards within the same footprint as the existing structure.  d. The proposed new structure will be less than 125% of the size of the structure is it  replacing.  e. The proposed addition will be less than 25% of the size of the existing structure to  which is being added.  f. The proposed addition or new structure will not be set closer to the street than any  unit within the block.  g. The proposed addition or new structure will be less than 125% of the average size  of the other similar structure within the same block that are located within the  setback.  h. The proposed addition or new structure would negatively impact adjoining  properties by hampering their ability to develop within the required setbacks or  maintain existing and future buildings.  i. There is adequate space for future and long‐term maintenance of the proposed  addition or new structure an adjoining structures.  j. The maintenance or location of fences or other structures are negatively impacted.  k. Existing large tree or significant features of the lot are preserved.  5. The presence of other structure in the block with reduced setbacks does not automatically  entitle another property to have the same reduced setbacks.  All applications shall be  considered in detail on a case‐by‐case basis.  Staff Analysis  The subject site is located within the Old Town Overlay District, surrounded by single family  residences and bounded by East 9 ½ Street to the north and Walnut Street to the west. East 9  ½ extends for one block between Walnut and Pine Streets generating very little traffic flow.  The current use for the site is a single family residence, and the property is zoned Residential  Single Family (RS). The property currently takes driveway access from 9 ½ Street, which will  remain unchanged.    The current structure on the site is an approximately 2,500 square foot, two‐story historic  structure, which serves as the primary residence. The site previously included two accessory  structures; an open ended carport, and a two story garage. All three original structures are  shown on the property survey, included as Exhibit 1.     The applicant proposes to construct a 677 square foot accessory structure, which includes a first  floor garage and storage room, plus a second story recreational room. The Residential Single  Family (RS) setbacks apply to this project and are as follows:      Zoning Board of Adjustment Staff Report  SE‐2014‐001 913 South Walnut Street Special Exception Page 4 of 5   20’ from the property line adjacent to 9 ½ Street (due to the driveway access)   10’ from the eastern adjacent property, located at 906 Pine Street   6’ from the southern adjacent property line, located at 915 Walnut Street    Due to the lot dimensions and existing structures, the required setbacks limit the use of the rear  yard for garage and additional uses. The proposed project will encroach 9 feet in to the rear  setback and 15 feet in to the side setback.     The applicant’s request for a setback modification would allow the applicant to construct a new  building where a previous building was located on the property. The site constraints limit  compliance with the setbacks required by the RS zoning district. The property is a private  residence and granting the setback modification will not create a more profitable use for the site.     The proposed setbacks are generally consistent with the surrounding block. 10 of the 12  properties included in the 200 foot notification area have existing accessory buildings located  within the required residential setbacks. Therefore, the placement of the proposed accessory  structure would be compatible with the surrounding properties and not have an adverse effect  on the context of the neighborhood. In addition, the proposed structure does not exceed 125% of  the average size of similar structures located within the block.     The primary structure and accessory buildings have occupied the site during the previous year.  The primary structure remains in place and the proposed accessory structure will be located on  the footprint of the previous structure. The footprint of the structure will remain the same and  the addition of the second story will not increase the total size by more than 125% of the previous  structure. Additionally, the proposed 677 square foot structure is approximately 23% of the size  of the primary structure. The proposed accessory structure will not extend any further into the  current setbacks than the primary structure or the prior structure.     The proposed accessory structure will not prevent development of the adjacent properties, nor  hamper the ability to conduct the necessary maintenance of the structure and site.    Per UDC Section 4.09, accessory structures built in the setback are limited to one story and 8 feet  in height. ZBA approval is required for the construction of an accessory building exceeding 8 feet  and located within the setback.   HARC’s review authority overlaps with the Zoning Board of  Adjustment, with the review centering upon the scale, massing and overall impact upon the  surrounding neighborhood. The HARC case is set for the October 23, 2014 agenda.     This project requires approval by the Zoning Board of Adjustment, the Historic and    Zoning Board of Adjustment Staff Report  SE‐2014‐001 913 South Walnut Street Special Exception Page 5 of 5  Architectural Review Commission and the necessary building permits prior to completion.     Considering the information above and the supporting documentation of the applicant, staff  considers the request for a Special Exception for the setback modification appropriate and  recommends approval.  Public Comments  A total of 21 notices were sent out to property owners within 200 feet of the subject property.   Public notice was posted in the Sun newspaper on October 5, 2014.  As of the day of this report,  the City of Georgetown is in receipt of three public comments in support of this application, from  the property owner located at 906 South Pine Street.   Staff Recommendation  Staff recommends approval of the Special Exception for Setback Modification to allow the  construction of an accessory structure within the side and rear setbacks as presented.   Attachments  Exhibit 1 – Location Map  Exhibit 2 – Applicant’s Supporting Documentation:  Letter of Request  Site Dimensions and Survey  Aerial, Photos, Renderings  Exhibit 3 – Zoning Notification Letters  Submitted By  Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner  City of Georgetown, Texas SUBJECT: Public Hearing and possible action on a Special Exception for expansion of a nonconforming structure at Fleager Addition, Block 1, Lots 7-20 & 22, located at 723 West University Avenue. ITEM SUMMARY: Background: The applicant is requesting that the Zoning Board of Adjustment (ZBA) approve a Special Exception for building expansion as required by Section 14.04.080.B. of the UDC, since the existing structure was determined to be a nonconforming structure, based upon it’s location in both the front and side setbacks. The applicant proposes to expand the building up to 100%, and is therefore required to obtain approval from the Zoning Board of Adjustment. The proposed renovation would remove the portion of the building that extends into the front setback along W. University Ave. and expand the remaining portion of the building to the east. The current parking and pavement in the setbacks will be redesigned with six (6) of the 10 spaces relocated internally. Public Comments: No public comments have been received as of the writing of this report. Recommended Motion: Approval of the request for a Special Exception for expansion of a nonconforming structure at Fleager Addition, Block 1, Lots 7-20 & 22, located at 723 West University Avenue. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The applicant has paid the required fees. SUBMITTED BY: Carla J. Benton ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Staff Report Cover Memo Report Exhibit 1 Backup Material Report Exhibit 2 Backup Material Georgetown Planning Department Zoning Board of Adjustment Staff Report Fleager Addition Special Exception Page 1 of 3 Meeting Date: October 21, 2012 File No: SE-2014-002 Report Date: October 8, 2014 Staff Review: Carla J. Benton, Planner Staff Recommendation: Approval Subject Public Hearing and possible action on a Special Exception for expansion of a nonconforming structure at Fleager Addition, Block 1, Lots 7-20 & 22, located at 723 West University Avenue. Application Summary Applicant: Lee McIntosh Property Owner: Stapel LP Property Address: 723 West University Avenue Legal Description: Fleager Addition, Block 1, Lots 7-20 & 22 Zoning District: C-1, Local Commercial Relevant UDC Section: Section 14.04.080.B., Expansion of a Nonconforming Structure The applicant is requesting Special Exception approval from the Zoning Board of Adjustment (ZBA) for building expansion as required by Section 14.04.080.B. of the UDC, because the structure was determined to be a nonconforming structure, based upon it’s location in both the front and side setbacks. The applicant proposes to expand the building up to 100%, and is therefore required to seek approval from the Zoning Board of Adjustment. The renovation would remove the portion of the building that extends into the front setback along W. University Ave. and expand the remaining portion of the building to the east. The current parking and pavement in the setbacks will be redesigned with six (6) of the 10 spaces relocated internally. Background The most recent use of the structure at 723 W. University Ave. was a barbeque restaurant and has been a restaurant for many years. The building was built in 1953 according to the Williamson County Appraisal District but is not listed on the Historic Resource Survey. Authorization/Review Criteria Section 14.04.080 Expansion of a Nonconforming Structure states: “B. A legal nonconforming structure may be expanded or enlarged in excess of 50% of its size only upon approval of a Special Exception by the Zoning Board of Adjustment, pursuant to Section 3.15 of this Code. Per UDC Section 3.15.040, the Zoning Board of Adjustment (Board) may grant a Special Exception from the requirements of certain provisions of the UDC, if the exception is not contrary to the public interest, the spirit of the Code is preserved, and substantial justice is done. There are no criteria or standards for review of this type of Special Exception request in the UDC; unlike a Zoning Board of Adjustment Staff Report Fleager Addition Special Exception Page 2 of 3 variance, it is at the discretion of the ZBA. Staff Analysis The applicant has requested relief from the limitations of expansion to remodel and expand the current structure up to 100%. The current structure is very old and in poor condition with a current encroachment of the building into the front setback. The proposed remodel would bring the structure out of the front setback and the applicant proposes to install a new storefront and roof structure, creating new facades on all four sides. The parking would be reconfigured as depicted in the blue area below, with six parking spaces being removed from the front setback improving the aesthetics at this intersection. The applicant proposes to meet current parking requirements for the overall site. With a Site Plan application the applicant proposes to bring the landscape for the redevelopment area into compliance with current codes. Due to the improvements to the structure, site, landscape and streetscape staff considers the Special Exception request appropriate, an improvement to the current situation, and recommends approval of the requested expansion. Public Comments A total of nineteen (19) notices were sent out to property owners within 200 feet of the subject property. Public notice was posted in the Sun newspaper on October 5, 2014. As of the day of this report, there has been no public comment submitted to the Planning Department office regarding the application. Zoning Board of Adjustment Staff Report Fleager Addition Special Exception Page 3 of 3 Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the Special Exception as follows: Approval to allow expansion of the existing structure up to 100%. Attachments Exhibit 1 – Location Map Exhibit 2 – Applicant’s Letter of Request Submitted By Carla Benton, Planner and Andrew Spurgin, AICP, Planning Director W UNIVERSITY AVE W 10TH ST RAILROADAVE SCENICDR HART ST SC EN I C DR W 11TH ST MONTGOMERY ST WEST ST W 13TH ST SE-2014-002 SE-2014-002 Exhibit #1 Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only 0 200 400Feet ¯ LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ §¨¦35 W University Ave S Austin Ave Site City Limits Street Site ³