Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda_ZBA_04.05.2016Notice of Meeting for the Zoning Board of Adjustment of the City of Georgetown April 5, 2016 at 5:00 PM at Council Chambers, 101 East 7th Street, Georgetown The City of Georgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If you require assistance in participating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the ADA, reasonable assistance, adaptations, or accommodations will be provided upon request. Please contact the City at least four (4) days prior to the scheduled meeting date, at (512) 930-3652 or City Hall at 113 East 8th Street for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. Public Wishing to Address the Board On a subject that is posted on this agenda: Please fill out a speaker registration form which can be found at the Board meeting. Clearly print your name, the letter of the item on which you wish to speak, and present it to the Staff Liaison, preferably prior to the start of the meeting. You will be called forward to speak when the Board considers that item. On a subject not posted on the agenda: Persons may add an item to a future Board agenda by filing a written request with the Staff Liaison no later than one week prior to the Board meeting. The request must include the speaker's name and the specific topic to be addressed with sufficient information to inform the board and the public. For Board Liaison contact information, please logon to http://government.georgetown.org/category/boards-commissions/. A As of the deadline, no persons were signed up to speak on items other than what was posted on the agenda. Legislative Regular Agenda B Call to Order Pledge of Allegiance Comments from the Chair - Welcome and Meeting Procedures Action from Executive Session C Consideration and possible action to elect a Vice-chair for 2016-2017 Zoning Board of Adjustment. D Consideration and possible action to elect a Secretary for 2016-2017 Zoning Board of Adjustment. E Consideration and possible action of the Minutes from the October 20, 2015, Zoning Board of Adjustment meeting. F Public Hearing and possible action on a Variance, to Section 7.03.020 (Non-Residential Lot and Dimension Standards) of the Unified Development Code (UDC), to allow parking in the 25-foot front yard setback, and to reduce the required number of off-street parking spaces, on a 0.132-acre undeveloped Page 1 of 20 commercial lot located at 1206 Hart Street. VAR-2016-001, Carolyn Horner, AICP Adjournment CERTIFICATE OF POSTING I, Shelley Nowling, City Secretary for the City of Georgetown, Texas, do hereby certify that this Notice of Meeting was posted at City Hall, 113 E. 8th Street, a place readily accessible to the general public at all times, on the ______ day of __________________, 2016, at __________, and remained so posted for at least 72 continuous hours preceding the scheduled time of said meeting. ____________________________________ Shelley Nowling, City Secretary Page 2 of 20 City of Georgetown, Texas Zoning Board of Adjustment April 5, 2016 SUBJECT: Consideration and possible action to elect a Vice-chair for 2016-2017 Zoning Board of Adjustment. ITEM SUMMARY: Consideration and possible action to elect a Vice-chair for 2016-2017 Zoning Board of Adjustment. FINANCIAL IMPACT: NA SUBMITTED BY: Tammy Glanville, Recording Secretary Page 3 of 20 City of Georgetown, Texas Zoning Board of Adjustment April 5, 2016 SUBJECT: Consideration and possible action to elect a Secretary for 2016-2017 Zoning Board of Adjustment. ITEM SUMMARY: Consideration and possible action to elect a Secretary for 2016-2017 Zoning Board of Adjustment. FINANCIAL IMPACT: N/A SUBMITTED BY: Tammy Glanville, Recording Secretary Page 4 of 20 City of Georgetown, Texas Zoning Board of Adjustment April 5, 2016 SUBJECT: Consideration and possible action of the Minutes from the October 20, 2015, Zoning Board of Adjustment meeting. ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: NA SUBMITTED BY: Tammy Glanville, Recording Secretary ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Draft ZBA Minutes_October 20, 2015 Cover Memo Page 5 of 20 Page 1 of 2 City of Georgetown, Texas Zoning Board of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Tuesday, October 20, 2015 at 5:00 PM Council Chambers 101 E. 7thStreet, Georgetown, Texas 78626 Board members: Josh Schroeder, Chair; Will Moore, David Thompson, and Kevin Pitts, Philip Voigt This is a regular meeting of the Zoning Board of Adjustment of the City of Georgetown. The Board, appointed by the Mayor and the City Council, acts on requests for variances, interpretations and special exceptions under the Georgetown Zoning Ordinance. Board Member(s) Absent: Staff Present: Juan Enriquez, Planner, Sofia Nelson, Planning Director and Stephanie McNickle, Recording Secretary. Chair Schroeder called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. Regular Session - To begin no earlier than 5:00 p.m. A. Call to Order – 5:02 p.m. B. Action from Executive Session – There was not an Executive Session. C As of the deadline, no persons were signed up to speak on items other than what was posted on the agenda. D Consideration and possible action of the Minutes from the February 17, 2015, May 19, 2015 and June 16, 2015 Zoning Board of Adjustment meeting. Motion by Board member David Thompson to approve the minutes from the February 17, 2015, May 19, 2015 and June 16, 2015 Zoning Board of Adjustment meeting. Second by Board member E Public Hearing and possible action on a Variance request to Section 6.03.050.A (Residential Single-Family District - Lot and Dimensional Standards) of the Unified Development Code (UDC), to allow a proposed single-family residence to provide a four foot, one inch (4’-1”) side yard setback instead of the required minimum six (6) foot side yard setback on a 4,680 square foot undeveloped residential lot located within the Coffee Addition, Tract 1, Block 15, at 2106 San Jose Street. (VAR-2015-007) Juan Enriquez, Planner Juan Enriquez provided an overview of the Variance request, description of project and recommend for approval. Discussion between staff and Board regarding setback. Page 6 of 20 Page 2 of 2 Motion by Board member David Thompson to approve Variance request to Section 6.03.050.A (Residential Single-Family District - Lot and Dimensional Standards) of the Unified Development Code (UDC), to allow a proposed single-family residence to provide a four foot, one inch (4’-1”) side yard setback instead of the required minimum six (6) foot side yard setback on a 4,680 square foot undeveloped residential lot located within the Coffee Addition, Tract 1, Block 15, at 2106 San Jose Street. Second by Board member David Thompson. Approved. (5-0) 5. Adjourned at 5:20pm _____________________________________ __________________________________ Josh Schroeder, Chair Secretary Page 7 of 20 City of Georgetown, Texas Zoning Board of Adjustment April 5, 2016 SUBJECT: Public Hearing and possible action on a Variance, to Section 7.03.020 (Non-Residential Lot and Dimension Standards) of the Unified Development Code (UDC), to allow parking in the 25-foot front yard setback, and to reduce the required number of off-street parking spaces, on a 0.132-acre undeveloped commercial lot located at 1206 Hart Street. VAR-2016-001, Carolyn Horner, AICP ITEM SUMMARY: Background: The applicant is requesting a variance to allow parking for an office use within the front setback of the lot. The lot is zoned for commercial use, which requires a 25-foot front yard setback, and the applicant wishes to construct a small office building on the lot which will require on-site parking. The owner would like to save the 25-inch Pecan tree located directly in the center of the lot and provide the space to allow this tree to become a Heritage Tree. In order to accommodate the owner’s request, the applicant is proposing to locate the office building to the rear of the subject property, and shift the parking to the front. Public Comment: All property owners within a 200 foot radius of the project site were notified of the application, a legal notice advertising the public hearing was placed in the Sun Newspaper and a sign was posted on-site. As of the date of this report, Planning Department staff has received one public comment in support of this application. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends Approval of the request to allow parking in the 25-foot front yard setback, and to reduce the required number of off-street parking spaces, with the following conditions: 1) Screening on front and side lot lines in front setback. 2) Opaque wall or landscape screening from adjacent properties. 3) Protection of pecan tree critical root zone. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Applicant has paid the fees. SUBMITTED BY: Carolyn Horner, AICP, and Sofia Nelson, CNU-A, Director ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Staff Report Cover Memo Location Backup Material Letter of Request Backup Material Conceptual Site Plan Backup Material Public Comment Backup Material Page 8 of 20   Georgetown Planning Department  Zoning Board of Adjustment Staff Report  1206 Hart Street Special Exception  Parking, Front yard setback Page 1 of 7  Meeting Date:  April 5, 2016   File No:  VAR‐2016‐001  Project Planner:  Carolyn Horner, AICP, Planner  Report Date:  February 1, 2016  Relevant UDC Section:  7.03.020 (Non‐Residential Lot and Dimension Standards)  Staff Recommendation: Approval  Item Description  Public Hearing and possible action on a Variance, to Section 7.03.020 (Non‐Residential Lot  and Dimension Standards) of the Unified Development Code (UDC), to allow parking in the  25‐foot front yard setback, and to reduce the required number of off‐street parking spaces, on  a 0.132‐acre undeveloped commercial lot located at 1206 Hart Street. (VAR‐2016‐001)  Item Details  Project Name: Prince Development Office  Project Address: 1206 Hart Street  Legal Description: Outlot Division A, Block 30 (PT)  Zoning: C‐3 (General Commercial)  Future Land Use: Moderate Density Residential    Applicant: David Platt, P.E.  Property Owner: Prince Development, LLC  Contact: David Platt, P.E.  Applicant Request  The applicant is requesting a variance to allow parking for an office use within the front  setback of the lot. The lot is zoned for commercial use, which requires a 25‐foot front yard  setback, and the applicant wishes to construct a small office building on the lot which will  require on‐site parking. The owner would like to save the 25‐inch Pecan tree located directly  in the center of the lot and provide the space to allow this tree to become a Heritage Tree. In  order to accommodate the owner’s request, the applicant is proposing to locate the office  building to the rear of the subject property, and shift the parking to the front.   Background  The original outlot divisions, including the lot in question, were intended for residential uses,  but the entire block is now zoned for commercial uses. 1206 Hart Street was zoned from RM‐ 1 Residential Multi‐family District to C2‐A Commercial First Height District in 1988, per  Page 9 of 20   Zoning Board of Adjustment Staff Report  1206 Hart Street Variance  Parking, Front yard setback Page 2 of 7  ordinance 880250. The lots to the south of the subject property were originally developed for  residential uses, so the configuration of this last lot more closely matches the original  residential zoning on the property. However, all of the lots to the south are zoned Office (OF)  and could be turned into non‐residential uses at any time. The lot to north is a self‐service car  wash, which was zoned C2‐A Commercial First Height District in 1974. The car wash  encroaches into the Hart Street front setback next door to the subject property.             1206 Hart Street is currently zoned General Commercial (C‐3). In UDC Table 7.03.020, Non‐  Residential Lot and Dimensional Standards, establishes that the front/street setback within the  C‐3 district shall be a minimum of 25 feet. UDC Section 7.03.030.C.4.a lists certain features that  area allowed within required setbacks, but allows parking to only encroach into a side or rear  setback under certain conditions.   In addition, UDC Table 9.02.030.A requires off‐street parking per gross floor area for  professional offices. The proposed building is 1,794 square feet of gross floor area, which  requires 4 spaces.   Page 10 of 20   Zoning Board of Adjustment Staff Report  1206 Hart Street Variance  Parking, Front yard setback Page 3 of 7  Site Analysis:      The overall lot is 5,742 square feet. Once the restrictions on setbacks, tree preservation, drive aisle  size requirement, and critical root zone limitations are taken into account, the developable area  remainder of the site is approximately 1,370 square feet, or 0.03 acre, which is 24% of the overall  site. By granting the request to allow parking to encroach into the front setback, the applicant  can save the 25‐inch Pecan tree.     Since the applicant desires to preserve the significant Pecan tree, UDC requirements of  parking and building within the setback cannot be accommodated.     Approximate location of Critical Root Zone of 25-inch Pecan that applicant wishes to keep Approximate UDC setbacks shown in red Approximate lot lines in blue Page 11 of 20   Zoning Board of Adjustment Staff Report  1206 Hart Street Variance  Parking, Front yard setback Page 4 of 7       Review Criteria  Per UDC Section 3.15.010, the Zoning Board of Adjustment (Board) may grant a Variance if the  variance is not contrary to the public interest and, due to special conditions, a literal  enforcement of the requirements would result in unnecessary hardship, so the spirit of the  Code is preserved, and substantial justice is done.      The criteria for review of a Variance in the UDC requires that the following findings be made:  Required Findings:  1. Extraordinary Conditions – that there are special conditions affecting the land involved  such that strict application of the provisions of the UDC will deprive the applicant of the  reasonable use of the land.  2. No Substantial Detriment – that the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to  the public health, safety or welfare or injurious to other property in the area or to the City  in administering the Code.  3. Other Property – that the conditions that create the need for the Variance do not generally  apply to other property in the vicinity.  4. Applicant’s Actions – that the conditions that create the need for the Variance are not self‐ imposed.  5. Comprehensive Plan – that the granting of the Variance would not substantially conflict  with the Comprehensive Plan and the purposes of the Code.  Page 12 of 20   Zoning Board of Adjustment Staff Report  1206 Hart Street Variance  Parking, Front yard setback Page 5 of 7  6. Utilization – that because of the conditions that create the need for the Variance, the  application of this Code to the paritcular piece of property would effectively prohibit or  unreasonably restrict the utilization of the property.  Insufficient Findings:  1. The property cannot be used for its highest and best use.  2. That there is a financial or economic hardship.  3. That there is a self‐created hardship by the property owner or their agent.  4. That the development objectives of the property owner are or will be frustrated.  Limitations – A variance may not be granted when the effect of which would be:  1. To allow the establishment of a use not otherwise permitted in the applicable Zoning  District.  2. To increase the density of a use above that permitted by the applicable District.  3. To extend physically a nonconforming use of land.  4. To change the Zoning District boundaries shown on the Official Zoning Map.  Staff Analysis   A. Required Findings  The Zoning Board of Adjustment may authorize a Variance from the requirements of the zoning  provisions of this Unified Development Code if the variance from the terms of the zoning  provisions is not contrary to the public interest and, due to special conditions, a literal  enforcement of the requirements would result in unnecessary hardship, so the spirit of this Code  is preserved, and substantial justice done. No Variance shall be granted unless the ZBA finds all  of the following:  1. Extraordinary Conditions  That there are extraordinary or special conditions affecting the land involved such that strict  application of the provisions of this Unified Development Code will deprive the applicant of  the reasonable use of their land.  For example, a Variance might be justified because of  topographic or other special conditions unique to the property and development involved,  while it would not be justified due to inconvenience or financial disadvantage.  The subject property and the surrounding properties are older and may have  difficulties complying with some of the current UDC development standards.  In  this case, the large Pecan tree in the middle of the property, along with current  setbacks created for a General Commercial lot, may not be reasonable for a 5,742  square feet lot with commercial zoning setbacks and a near‐heritage tree.    Page 13 of 20   Zoning Board of Adjustment Staff Report  1206 Hart Street Variance  Parking, Front yard setback Page 6 of 7  2. No Substantial Detriment  That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare  or injurious to other property in the area or to the City in administering this Code.  The proposed project will not be injurious or detrimental to the public health, safety  or welfare or improvements in the vicinity because it is located adjacent to non‐ residential land uses within the General Commercial and Office zoning districts, and  the site plan provides sufficient information to determine that the project meets all  other development standards with the exception of parking in the front yard setback,  and providing the required number of parking spaces.  Saving the 25‐inch Pecan tree  is beneficial to the public health and welfare. The applicant is proposing to locate the  new building to the rear of the property, in line with the adjacent structure to the  south.   3. Other Property  That the conditions that create the need for the Variance do not generally apply to other  property in the vicinity.  Each property is reviewed on a case‐by case basis as the circumstances and existing  conditions of each lot may differ greatly.  General Commercial zoning is envisioned  for larger properties. This is a smaller‐sized property challenged by a significant  natural feature, the 25‐inch Pecan tree, that we as a community value.   4. Applicant’s Actions  That the conditions that create the need for the Variance are not the result of the applicant’s  own actions.  The applicant wants to save the existing 25‐inch Pecan tree in the middle of the lot,  which results in the need for the Variance request.    5. Comprehensive Plan  That the granting of the Variance would not substantially conflict with the Comprehensive  Plan and the purposes of this Code.  Preservation of the existing 25‐inch Pecan tree is consistent with the Comprehensive  Plan, and the purposes of this Code. UDC Section 8.02 Tree Preservation and  Protection provides the means for preserving protected and Heritage level trees with  the community. By granting this variance, the applicant will have the ability to  preserve the existing tree and develop the property for commercial use.  Page 14 of 20   Zoning Board of Adjustment Staff Report  1206 Hart Street Variance  Parking, Front yard setback Page 7 of 7  6. Utilization  That because of the conditions that create the need for the Variance, the application of this  Code to the particular piece of property would effectively prohibit or unreasonably restrict  the utilization of the property.  Applying current development standards on this property would require the  removal of a near‐Heritage level Pecan tree. Preservation of the 25‐inch Pecan tree  would not be possible without the variance.  Granting the request for a reduction in parking spaces would limit the commercial  use of this commercially‐zone property.  Public Comments  Per the Unified Development Code, all property owners within a 200 foot radius of the project  site were notified of the application, a legal notice advertising the public hearing was placed  in the Sun Newspaper and a sign was posted on‐site.  As of the date of this report, Planning  Department staff has received one public comment in support of this application.    Staff Recommendation  Staff recommends Approval of the request to allow parking in the 25‐foot front yard setback,  and to reduce the required number of off‐street parking spaces, with the following conditions:    1) Screening on front and side lot lines in front setback.   2) Opaque wall or landscape screening from adjacent properties.   3) Protection of pecan tree critical root zone.    Attachments  Exhibit 1 – Location Map  Exhibit 2 – Applicant’s Letter of Intent Request  Exhibit 3 – Proposed Site Plan  Submitted By  Carolyn Horner, AICP, Planner and Sofia Nelson, CNU‐A, Planning Director  Page 15 of 20 VAR-2016-001 MARTIN LUTHER KING J R S T W UNIVERSITY AVE WEST ST RAILROADAVE HART ST TIMBER STW 13TH ST W 14TH ST WEST ST W 11TH ST VAR-2016-001Exhibit #1 Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only 0 200 400Feet ¯ LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ §¨¦35 W University Ave E University Ave S Austin Ave Site City Limits Street Site ³ Location Map Page 16 of 20 Page 17 of 20 Page 18 of 20 C-3 GENERAL COMMERICAL ZONING C-1 GENERAL COMMERICAL ZONING OFFICE ZONING (R e c o r d S 0 1 ° 1 9 ' 3 0 " 9 1 . 0 7 ' ) (R e c o r d S 0 0 ° 3 2 ' 1 5 " W 9 1 . 0 3 ' ) (R e c o r d N 0 1 ° 4 8 ' 1 5 " W 9 1 . 0 7 ' ) (Record East 65.00') (Re c o r d S 6 3 ° 5 3 ' 3 9 " W 0 . 5 0 ' ) HA R T S T R E E T 10,290 S Q F t . H.B. W a l k e r , I n c a T e x a s C o r p o r a t i o n 20150 1 8 4 4 9 0.298 A C Lori An n C o s p e r , A S i n g l e W o m a n 20070 1 5 6 9 1 Royce C o s p e r a n d w i f e , Joseph i n e C o s p e r 540/4 3 4 0.19 AC Wallen S e f c i k a n d w i f e , Charlen e S e f c i k 20140 5 7 7 0 1 PROPOSED BUILDING 1,794 SQ. FT. GFA 16" PECAN (TO BE REMOVED) N88°38'00"E112.89' S86°56'15"W108.74' N2 ° 4 8 ' 0 0 " W 50 . 1 6 ' S5 ° 1 9 ' 3 0 " E 46 . 8 9 ' 25" PECAN 25 ' F R O N T S E T B A C K (P E R U D C ) 10' SIDE SETBACK (PER UDC) 10' SIDE SETBACK (PER UDC) 10 ' R E A R S E T B A C K ( P E R U D C ) PORCH6'X16' OFFICE ZONING 5' SETBACK (PER UDC 7.03.030C.4.a.vii.) FFE = 752.50 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 2 - 9'x18' SP 1 - 11'x18' VAN ACCESSIBLE HC SP 18.0' EXTEND EXISTING PRIVACY FENCE LANDSCAPE BUFFER 5' SIDEWALK 24' MINIMUM DRIVEWAY 24' CURB STOP (TYP.) 3' 5' 5' LANDSCAPEBUFFER 11'9' NO.DATEREVISIONBY CHECKED BY: APPROVED BY: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: DATE DATE DATE DATE ADDRESS METRO SERVICES 1978 S. AUSTIN AVENUE 512.930.9412 GEORGETOWN, TX 78626 WEB STEGERBIZZELL.COM >>ENGINEERS >>PLANNERS >>SURVEYORS TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-181TBPLS FIRM No.10003700 22378 Project No: for JAMES PRINCE OFFICE HEADQUARTERS City of Georgetown Williamson County, Texas shall revise the design as necessary. There are existing water pipelines, underground telephone vicinity of this project. The Contractor shall contact all cables and other above and below ground utilities in the appropriate companies prior to any construction in the area and determine if any conflicts exist. If so, the Contractor shall immediately contact the Engineer who Warning! DLP 2015-10-28 KM 2015-10-28 2016-02-09 OF 13 THESE CONSTRUCTION PLANS HAVE BEEN PREPARED TO FULFILL THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE TCEQ FOR WATER POLLUTION ABATEMENT OVER THE EDWARDS AQUIFER.  CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEER FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILED CONSTRUCTION PLANS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 1 SCALE: 1" = 10' 1206 Hart Street 0.132 Acres C-3 Commercial Zoning Feet 0 10 20 PROPOSED SITE LAYOUT - VARIANCE 1 LEGEND: DRIVEWAY/ PARKING LOT PAVING SIDEWALK P: \ 2 2 0 0 0 - 2 2 9 9 9 \ 2 2 3 7 8 J a m e s P r i n c e O f f i c e S i t e \ D r a w i n g s \ P l a n s \ C O N C E P T U A L S I T E L A Y O U T . d w g , 2 / 1 5 / 2 0 1 6 8 : 5 2 : 1 2 A M , D P L A T T Page 19 of 20 Page 20 of 20