Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda ZBA 06.21.2022Notice of Meeting for the Zoning Board of Adjustment of the City of Georgetown June 21, 2022 at 5:00 PM at City Council Chambers - 510 West 9th Street, Georgetown, TX 78626 The City of Georgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If you require assistance in participating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the ADA, reasonable assistance, adaptations, or accommodations will be provided upon request. Please contact the City Secretary's Office, at least three (3) days prior to the scheduled meeting date, at (512) 930-3652 or City Hall at 808 Martin Luther King Jr. Street, Georgetown, TX 78626 for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. Public Wishing to Address the Board On a subject that is posted on this agenda: Please fill out a speaker registration form which can be found at the Board meeting. Clearly print your name, the letter of the item on which you wish to speak, and present it to the Staff Liaison, preferably prior to the start of the meeting. You will be called forward to speak when the Board considers that item. On a subject not posted on the agenda: Persons may add an item to a future Board agenda by filing a written request with the Staff Liaison no later than one week prior to the Board meeting. The request must include the speaker's name and the specific topic to be addressed with sufficient information to inform the board and the public. For Board Liaison contact information, please logon to http://government.georgetown.org/category/boards-commissions/. A At the time of posting, no persons had signed up to address the Board. Legislative Regular Agenda B Nomination and selection of Vice-chair for the 2022-2023 year. C Nomination and selection of Secretary for the 2022-2023 year. D Consideration and possible action to approve the minutes from the January 18, 2022 regular meeting of the Zoning Board of Adjustment -- Stephanie McNickle, Planning Technician E Public Hearing and possible action on a Zoning Variance from the fuel sales canopy height limit pursuant to Section 5.04.020 of the Unified Development Code, for the property located at 3201 NE Inner Loop, bearing the legal description of 8.107 acres of land in the Antonio Flores Survey, Abstract Number 10 (2022-3-VAR). Ryan Clark, Planner II F Public Hearing and possible action on a Zoning Variance from the fuel sales canopy height limit pursuant to Section 5.04.020 of the Unified Development Code, for the property located at 3930 Shell Road, bearing the legal description of 7.970 acres of land in the William Roberts Survey, Abstract Number 524 (2022-4-VAR). Ryan Clark, Planner II G Public Hearing and possible action on a Zoning Variance from the fuel sales canopy height limit pursuant to Section 5.04.020 of the Unified Development Code, for the property located at 3930 Shell Road, bearing the legal description of 7.970 acres of land in the William Roberts Survey, Abstract Number 524 (2022-5-VAR). Ryan Clark, Planner Page 1 of 118 Adjournment Certificate of Posting I, Robyn Densmore, City Secretary for the City of Georgetown, Texas, do hereby certify that this Notice of Meeting was posted at City Hall, 808 Martin Luther King Jr. Street, Georgetown, TX 78626, a place readily accessible to the general public as required by law, on the _____ day of _________________, 2022, at __________, and remained so posted for at least 72 continuous hours preceding the scheduled time of said meeting. __________________________________ Robyn Densmore, City Secretary Page 2 of 118 City of Georgetown, Texas Zoning Board of Adjustment June 21, 2022 SUBJECT: Nomination and selection of Vice-chair for the 2022-2023 year. ITEM SUMMARY: Nomination and selection of Vice-chair for the 2022-2023 year. FINANCIAL IMPACT: .NA SUBMITTED BY: Mirna Garcia. Management Analyst Page 3 of 118 City of Georgetown, Texas Zoning Board of Adjustment June 21, 2022 SUBJECT: Nomination and selection of Secretary for the 2022-2023 year. ITEM SUMMARY: Nomination and selection of Secretary for the 2022-2022 year. FINANCIAL IMPACT: .na SUBMITTED BY: Mirna Garcia. Management Analyst Page 4 of 118 City of Georgetown, Texas Zoning Board of Adjustment June 21, 2022 SUBJECT: Consideration and possible action to approve the minutes from the January 18, 2022 regular meeting of the Zoning Board of Adjustment -- Stephanie McNickle, Planning Technician ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: . SUBMITTED BY: Mirna Garcia, Program Manager ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Minutes Cover Memo Page 5 of 118 Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 1 of 2 January 18, 2022 City of Georgetown, Texas Zoning Board of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Tuesday, January 18, 2022 at 5:00 p.m. Courts and Council Building, located at 510 W. 9th Street, Georgetown, TX 78626 Board members present: Kaylah McCord, Vice-chair; Ed Whitmore, Secretary; Stephaney Gipson Lafears, Travis Perthuis, Joseph Digiacomo (Board member Digiacomo served as a voting member in the absence of John Marler) Board members in training present: Joseph Digiacomo Board members absent: John Marler, Tim Haynie Staff Present: Sofia Nelson, Planning Director; Travis Baird, Assistant Planning Director; Ethan Harwell, Senior Planner and Stephanie McNickle, Planning Specialist Chair Marler called the meeting to order at 5:17 p.m. Public Wishing to Address the Board On a subject that is posted on this agenda: Please fill out a speaker registration form which can be found at the Board meeting. Clearly print your name, the letter of the item on which you wish to speak, and present it to the Staff Liaison, preferably prior to the start of the meeting. You will be called forward to speak when the Board considers that item. On a subject not posted on the agenda: Persons may add an item to a future Board agenda by filing a written request with the Staff Liaison no later than one week prior to the Board meeting. The request must include the speaker's name and the specific topic to be addressed with sufficient information to inform the board and the public. For Board Liaison contact information, please logon to http://government.georgetown.org/category/boards-commissions/. A. At the time of posting, no persons had signed up to address the Board. Legislative Agenda B. Consideration and possible action to approve the minutes from the November 16, 2021 regular meeting of the Zoning Board of Adjustment – Stephanie McNickle, Planning Specialist Motion by Board member Digiacomo to approve the minutes from the November 16, 2021. Second by Board member Whitmore. Approved. (5-0) C. Public Hearing and possible action on a Zoning Variance from UDC Sec. 8.07.040. to allow a fence height of 12-feet at the property line, a 50% increase from the maximum height of 8-feet for a fence on a single-family property with an adjacent non-residential use, for the property located at 1802 S. Austin Avenue, bearing the legal description of 0.54 acres in the Clement Stubblefield Survey, Abstract No. 558 (2021-14-VAR). Ethan Harwell, Senior Planner Page 6 of 118 Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 2 January 18, 2022 Staff gave a powerpoint presentation and stated the application is requesting approval of a modification to the required 8-feet maximum fence height for single-family residential properties for a fence height at the north property line of the subject property of 12-feet. The 12-feet tall fence has already been constructed along the north property line of the subject property, which separates the single-family residential structures on the subject property from the multi-family structures on the abutting property to the north. The applicant is proposing to retain the existing fence, which was installed without a fence permit by the prior property owner, and the applicant has described the fence height as necessary to secure the privacy, safety and comfort of their property, as the units on the abutting apartment complex have balconies that overlook the subject property’s back yard. Staff reviewed over the 7 Approval Criteria’s according to the Unified Development Code Section 3.15.030 Vice-chair McCord invited the applicant to speak. The applicant commended staff on their report and stated he would like to secure privacy and safety. He stated he and will be glad to answer any questions. Vice-chair McCord opened the Public Hearing. No one came forward, so the Public Hearing was closed. Discussion regarding application. Motion by Board member Perthuis to Deny the Zoning Variance from UDC Sec. 8.07.040. to allow a fence height of 12-feet at the property line, a 50% increase from the maximum height of 8-feet for a fence on a single-family property with an adjacent non-residential use, for the property located at 1802 S. Austin Avenue, bearing the legal description of 0.54 acres in the Clement Stubblefield Survey, Abstract No. 558 based on the UDC Section 3.15.030 Approval Criteria. 1) Extraordinary Conditions- Does not comply. 2) No Substantial Detriment- Does not comply. 3) Other Property- Does not comply. 4) Applicant’s Actions- Does not comply. 5) Comprehensive Plan- Does not comply. 6) Utilization – Does not comply. 7) Insufficient Findings- Does not comply. Second by Whitmore. Denial Approved. (5-0) Motion to adjourn at 5:37p.m. ______________________________________ _________________________________________ ______________________________________ _________________________________________ Chair Attest Secretary Page 7 of 118 City of Georgetown, Texas Zoning Board of Adjustment June 21, 2022 SUBJECT: Public Hearing and possible action on a Zoning Variance from the fuel sales canopy height limit pursuant to Section 5.04.020 of the Unified Development Code, for the property located at 3201 NE Inner Loop, bearing the legal description of 8.107 acres of land in the Antonio Flores Survey, Abstract Number 10 (2022-3-VAR). Ryan Clark, Planner II ITEM SUMMARY: Overview of Applicant’s Request: The applicant is requesting a variance to the height limit for fuel sales canopies to allow for the overall canopy height of their proposed canopy at 3201 NE Inner Loop to be 20 feet tall, a 17.6% variance to the UDC’s limit of 17 feet set in UDC 5.04.020.T.7. Staff’s Analysis: The following are the pertinent sections of the Unified Development Code (UDC) related to this request: UDC Section 5.04.020. – Commercial Use Limitations, T. Fuel Sales, 7: The bottom of the canopy shall be a minimum of 13 feet six inches in height. The maximum height of the overall canopy shall not exceed 17 feet. Staff has reviewed the variance request and the applicant’s stated findings, and has evaluated the request based on the UDC required findings for a variance in accordance with UDC Section 3.15.030, which stated: Required Findings The Zoning Board of Adjustment may authorize a variance from the requirements of the zoning provisions of the UDC if the variance from the terms of the zoning provisions is not contrary to the public interest and, due to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the requirements would result in unnecessary hardship, so the spirit of this Code is preserved, and substantial justice done. No variance shall be granted unless the ZBA finds all of the required findings established in UDC Section 3.15.030.A. Staff has reviewed the submitted Zoning Variance request in accordance with the UDC and other applicable codes. Staff has determined that the request partially complies with 1 and does not comply with 6 of the 7 required findings established in UDC Section 3.15.030.A for a Zoning Variance as outlined in the attached staff report. Public Comments: As required by the Unified Development Code (UDC), all property owners and registered neighborhood associations within 300-feet of the subject property were notified of the request (13 notices mailed), a legal notice advertising the public hearing was placed in the Sun Newspaper (Sunday, June 5, 2022) and signs were posted on-site. As of the publication date of this report, staff has received 0 written comments in favor and 0 in opposition of the request. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. The applicant has paid the required application fees. Page 8 of 118 SUBMITTED BY: Ryan Clark, Planner II ATTACHMENTS: Description Type [2022-3-VAR] - ZBA Staff Report Cover Memo Exhibit 1 - Location Map Exhibit Exhibit 2 - Conceptual Plan Exhibit Exhibit 3 - Letter of Intent Exhibit Presentation Presentation Page 9 of 118 Zoning Board of Adjustment Planning Department Staff Report 2022-3-VAR QuikTrip 4184 Fuel Sales Canopy Page 1 of 6 Report Date: Friday, June 17, 2022 Case No: 2022-3-VAR Project Planner: Ryan Clark, Planner II Item Details Project Name: QuikTrip 4184 Fuel Sales Canopy Project Location: 3201 NE Inner Loop, within City Council district No. 6. Legal Description: 8.107 acres of land in the Antonio Flores Survey, Abstract Number 10 Applicant: QT South LLC, c/o David Meyer Property Owner: QT South LLC, c/o David Meyer Request: Zoning Variance to the Fuel Sales Canopy height limit set by UDC Section 5.04.020.T. Case History: This is the first public hearing of this request. Page 10 of 118 Planning Department Staff Report 2022-3-VAR QuikTrip 4184 Fuel Sales Canopy Page 2 of 6 Overview of Applicant’s Request The applicant is requesting a variance to the height limit for fuel sales canopies to allow for the overall canopy height of their proposed canopy at 3201 NE Inner Loop to be 20 feet tall, a 17.6% variance to the UDC’s limit of 17 feet set in UDC 5.04.020.T.7. Site Information Location: The subject property sits at the southeastern intersection of North Austin Avenue and NE Inner Loop. It is currently zoned General Commercial (C-3) and is being developed with a Fuel Sales use and associated General Retail. Physical and Natural Features: The subject property has a shallow slope running from north to south and a steeper incline generally within the Right-of-Way with existing above ground utility lines along both roadways and no existing notable vegetation. Future Land Use and Zoning Designations: The subject property has a Community Center Future Land Use designation and is currently zoned C- 3 and is part the Highway Gateway Overlay District that runs along North Austin Avenue. Surrounding Properties: The subject property is in a developing transitory area that is highway oriented to the west and transitions to a lower intensity neighborhood area to the east. The current zoning, Future Land Use designation, and existing uses of the adjacent properties to the north, south, east and west are outlined in the table below: DIRECTION ZONING DISTRICT FUTURE LAND USE EXISTING USE North C-3, IN, IH 35 ROW Regional Center Industrial subdivision, General Retail South MF-2, C-3 Mixed-Density Neighborhood Attached Multi-Family, no current use (C-3) East C-3, AG Regional Center Undeveloped West C-3, IH 35 ROW Regional Center IH 35 ROW Page 11 of 118 Planning Department Staff Report 2022-3-VAR QuikTrip 4184 Fuel Sales Canopy Page 3 of 6 Approval Criteria The following are the pertinent sections of the Unified Development Code (UDC) related to this request: • UDC Section 5.04.020.T restricts the height of Canopies for the Fuel Sales Use to a minimum base height of 13 feet and a maximum height for the top of the canopy to 17 feet. Staff has reviewed the variance request and the applicant’s stated findings, and has evaluated the request based on the UDC required findings for a variance in accordance with UDC Section 3.15.030, which stated: Required Findings The Zoning Board of Adjustment may authorize a variance from the requirements of the zoning provisions of the UDC if the variance from the terms of the zoning provisions is not contrary to the public interest and, due to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the requirements would result in unnecessary hardship, so the spirit of this Code is preserved, and substantial justice done. No variance shall be granted unless the ZBA finds all of the required findings established in UDC Section 3.15.030.A. Staff has reviewed the submitted Zoning Variance request in accordance with the UDC and other applicable codes. Staff has determined that the request partially complies with 1 of the 7 and does not comply with 6 of the 7 required findings established in UDC Section 3.15.030.A for a Zoning Variance as outlined below. Page 12 of 118 Planning Department Staff Report 2022-3-VAR QuikTrip 4184 Fuel Sales Canopy Page 4 of 6 ZONING MAP VARIANCE APPROVAL CRITERIA 1. Extraordinary Conditions That there are extraordinary or special conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the provisions of this Unified Development Code will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of their land. For example, a Zoning Variance might be justified because of topographic or other special conditions unique to the property and development involved, while it would not be justified due to inconvenience or financial disadvantage. Does Not Comply There are no extraordinary or special conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the provisions of this Unified Development Code will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of their land. The applicants stated reasoning for the ability to serve certain types of vehicles through a higher clearance of the fueling canopy is not unique or beyond ordinary for the land involved, and would be of equal concern for any proposed fuel sales use in and out of Georgetown. Additionally, there were not sufficient findings to demonstrate that a canopy meeting the letter of the code couldn’t accommodate the applicant’s referenced 14’ vehicles. The UDC allows for a maximum height of 17’, and there was not sufficient information to demonstrate a canopy couldn’t be constructed that has a base height above 14’ and a max height at 17 feet. Additionally, the condition with which higher clearance is needed would be ordinary for any fuel sales use, and not just for this specific use at this specific property. 2. No Substantial Detriment That the granting of the Zoning Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or injurious to other property in the area or to the City in administering this Code. Partially Complies Granting the variance will not be detrimental to the public health or safety as it will still be required to follow all safety codes such as the adopted 2015 International Building and Fire Codes. While the increase in allowed height by 17% to allow for a 20’ tall canopy will not be substantially detrimental to the public welfare, it will still have a negative impact. The limitations placed on the fuel sales use and more specifically the height restriction for fuel canopies limits the scope of the fuel sales use, and thus helps to limit the physical presence of the heavily auto-oriented use in the area. 3. Other Property That the conditions that create the need for the Zoning Variance do not generally apply to other property in the vicinity. Does Not Comply There is not any evidence of unique conditions on the property. The height limits of the UDC measure height per UDC Section 7.02.030.D. as the “vertical distance between the lowest finished grade at the edge of the building or the base flood elevation, where applicable, and the highest point of the coping of a flat roof.” The issue of there not being enough clearance for a vehicle of a certain height would generally apply to any other property developing with fuel sales as each finished form would still place the finished grade where the vehicle would park 17’ below the top of the canopy. 4. Applicant's Actions That the conditions that create the need for the Zoning Variance are not the result of the applicant's own actions. Does Not Comply Page 13 of 118 Planning Department Staff Report 2022-3-VAR QuikTrip 4184 Fuel Sales Canopy Page 5 of 6 ZONING MAP VARIANCE APPROVAL CRITERIA The conditions for which the application is requesting the Zoning Variance are the result of the Applicant’s own actions, as there is not an existing site constraint that prevents the construction of a compliant fuel canopy. Instead the applicant is seeking the variance to potentially serve a specific type of customer. 5. Comprehensive Plan That the granting of the Zoning Variance would not substantially conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and the purposes of this Code. Does Not Comply Granting the Zoning Variance substantially conflicts with the Comprehensive Plan and the purposes of this code. This particular property is part of the Scenic Gateway Corridor and the associated Gateway Overlay District. Two recommendations from the Comprehensive Plan for the Scenic Gateways of the City are that they have low monument signs constructed of native masonry materials and limited lighting with buildings set back significantly from the roadway. This overall creates a clear recommendation for a lower intensity form that granting the variance and increasing the overall size of the gas canopy will conflict with. Part of the canopies are the branding and logos placed along their front, which goes against the intent for scenic corridors when it comes to lower, less intrusive signage. Granting the variance also goes against the purpose of the UDC, as it places specific and explicit recommendations for fuel sales rather than general dimensional regulations for each zoning district. Allowing for the fuel canopy to be higher than the explicit height limit goes against the purpose of limiting the size and scope of fuel canopies. 6. Utilization That because of the conditions that create the need for the Zoning Variance, the application of this Code to the particular piece of property would effectively prohibit or unreasonably restrict the utilization of the property. Does Not Comply There is not sufficient information to demonstrate that the conditions that create the need for the Zoning Variance would unreasonably restrict the utilization of the property. While the applicant’s stated reason that Class A Motorhomes up to 14’ in height could collide with a canopy that is 13’ 6” at the base of the cover, there is not sufficient information to demonstrate that a canopy with a base above 14’ in height and maximum height of 17’ can’t be constructed. Additionally, if Class A motorhomes were unable to access the pumps under the canopy, there is not sufficient information to demonstrate that the pumps couldn’t be modified so that a higher clearance vehicle could utilize it. Additionally, there was not sufficient information provided to demonstrate that the business cannot reasonably conduct fuel sales to vehicles under 13’ 6”, nor was there sufficient information provided to demonstrate that the retail convenience stores operation will be unreasonably inhibited by the fuel canopy height restriction. 7. Insufficient Findings The following types of possible findings do not constitute sufficient grounds for granting a Zoning Variance: a. That the property cannot be used for its highest and best use. b. That there is a financial or economic hardship. Does Not Comply Page 14 of 118 Planning Department Staff Report 2022-3-VAR QuikTrip 4184 Fuel Sales Canopy Page 6 of 6 ZONING MAP VARIANCE APPROVAL CRITERIA c. That there is a self-created hardship by the property owner or their agent. d. That the development objectives of the property owner are or will be frustrated. There were not any findings that constituted granting a zoning variance. The applicant’s reasoning that granting the variance could allow for 14’ tall vehicles could be categorized as a financial hardship or that the property cannot be used for its highest and best use. That reasoning only demonstrates that a potential type of customer may not be able to effectively use the business and does not effectively demonstrate that the use cannot be reasonably operated. It also appears to be a self-created hardship since the applicant is seeking the variance to allow for 14’ tall vehicles, nor were there sufficient findings to demonstrate that a canopy couldn’t be constructed to allow for 14’ tall vehicles while still meeting the overall height limit of 17’. There were also not sufficient findings that a fuel pump could not be constructed on site without a canopy for high clearance vehicles while still providing a canopy for the majority of the fuel pumps on site. The requested Zoning Variance does not comply with 6 of the 7 approval criteria and only partially complies with 1 of the 7. There is not an extraordinary or unique condition present on the property, and staff found that there was insufficient evidence to demonstrate that the fuel canopy height limit unreasonably restricts the use of the property. The requested zoning variance does not fit the recommendations for the built form of developments along scenic corridors and creates a built form that will potentially negatively impact the built character of the area. Public Notification As required by the Unified Development Code, all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the subject property were notified of the Zoning Variance request (11 notices), a legal notice advertising the public hearing was placed in the Sun Newspaper (Sunday, June 5, 2022) and signs were posted on-site. To date, staff has received 0 written comments in favor, and 0 in opposition to the request. Attachments Exhibit 1 – Location Map Exhibit 2 – Conceptual Plan Exhibit 3 – Letter of Intent Page 15 of 118 Location 2022-3-VAR Exhibit #1 J E F F E R S O N L N INDU S T R I A L P A R K C I R LAK E W A Y D R HICKORY T R E E D R N A U S T I N A V E NE I N N ER LOOP NEINNERLOOP EX I T 264NB NIH35NB LAKEWAYDR S T A D I U M D R A S P E N T R L M A H O G A N Y L N O R A N G E T R E E L N NIH35SB EVERG R E E N C I R SUDDUTHDR EXIT262SB N IH 3 5 F W Y S B N IH 3 5 F W Y N B 0 500250 Feet ¯ Site Parcels City Limits Georgetown ETJ Page 16 of 118 Qu i k T r i p N o . A SHEET TITLE: SHEET NUMBER: DIVISION: DESIGNED BY: 1 © COPYRIGHT QUIKTRIP CORPORATION 2011 ANY UNAUTHORIZED USE, REPRODUCTION, PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR SALE IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. OR I G I N A L I S S U E D A T E : PROTOTYPE: VERSION: PROJECT NO.: DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY: RE V DA T E DE S C R I P T I O N B C D E F G H J K L M N P Q A B C D E F G H J K L M N P Q 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 41 8 4 N. A U S T I N A V E & N E I N N E R L O O P GE O R G E T O W N , T E X A S 4184.01 P-106 (05/01/21) 82 001 C. Wood CR JJV Qu i k T r i p N o . A SHEET TITLE: SHEET NUMBER: DIVISION: DESIGNED BY: 1 © COPYRIGHT QUIKTRIP CORPORATION 2011 ANY UNAUTHORIZED USE, REPRODUCTION, PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR SALE IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. OR I G I N A L I S S U E D A T E : PROTOTYPE: VERSION: PROJECT NO.: DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY: RE V DA T E DE S C R I P T I O N B C D E F G H J K L M N P Q A B C D E F G H J K L M N P Q 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 EN G I N E E R I N G & S U R V E Y I N G FOR REVIEW. THIS DOCUMENT IS RELEASED FOR THE PURPOSE OF REVIEW UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF JOSHUA J VALENTA, P.E. #114592 ON 6/21/2021. IT IS NOT TO BE USED FOR BIDDING, PERMIT, OR CONSTRUCTION, Vicinity Map C001 COVER SHEET 3201 NE INNER LOOP GEORGETOWN, TEXAS 78626 QUIKTRIP STORE #4184SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR FLOOD CERTIFICATION: GENERAL NOTES: WARRANTY/DISCLAIMER: NOTICE TO BIDDERS: CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TX MUNICIPAL CONTACT LIST: PROJECT CONTACT LIST:BENCHMARKS: N 01 OF 56 N IH - 3 5 IN N E R L O O P AU S T I N A V E ODS QUANTITIES: DEVELOPED SITE (LOD) ONSITE CONCRETE ALTERNATE: ONSITE ASPHALT/CONCRETE UG DETENTION LANDSCAPE AREA OFFSITE PAVING MASONRY CANOPY WATER QUALITY UNIT -UNIT TYPE: 179,369SF 63,618SF 34,475SF/29,142 SF __,___CF 100,540SF 5,818SF NO YES WATER QUALITY PLAN THE QUANTITIES ABOVE ARE INTENDED FOR INTERNAL TRACKING PURPOSES ONLY. THEY ARE NOT REPRESENTATIVE OF THE QUANTITIES FOR BIDDING PURPOSES. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CALCULATING THEIR OWN QUANTITIES. CITY OF GEORGETOWN GENERAL NOTES SHEET INDEX SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE C001 COVER SHEET C002 PLAT SHEET 1 C003 PLAT SHEET 2 C020 TREE AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SHEET 1 C021 TREE AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SHEET 2 C030 DEMOLITON PLAN C100 OVERALL SITE PLAN C101 SITE PLAN SHEET 1 C102 SITE PLAN SHEET 2 C103 FIRE PROTECTION PLAN A100 ARCHITECTUAL FLOOR PLAN A201 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SHEET 1 A202 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SHEET 2 A701 TRASH ENCLOSURE PLANS N201 GAS CANOPY COORDINATION ELEVATIONS C160 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN L100 LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET 1 L101 LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET 2 C150 UTILITY PLAN C151 CITY OF GEORGETOWN UTILITY DETAILS SHEET 1 C152 CITY OF GEORGETOWN UTILITY DETAILS SHEET 2 C153 CITY OF GEORGETOWN UTILITY DETAILS SHEET 3 C154 UTILITY VERIFICATION PLAN C155 SANITARY SEWER PROFILE C156 WATER EXTENSION PROFILE C110 OVERALL GRADING PLAN C111 GRADING PLAN SHEET 1 C112 GRADING PLAN SHEET 2 C113 DETAILED GRADING PLAN C114 CANOPY GRADING PLAN C115 ADA COMPLIANCE REFERENCE PLAN C120 STORM SEWER PLAN C121 PRE-DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE MAP C122 POST DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE MAP C123 TIME OF CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS C124 INLET CATCHMENT MAP C125 DETENTION & WATER QUALITY POND PLAN C126 POND CALCULATIONS C140 EROSION CONTROL PLAN PHASE 1 C141 EROSION CONTROL PLAN PHASE 2 C200 STORM SEWER PROFILES SHEET 1 C201 STORM SEWER PROFILES SHEET 2 C400 TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN C401 TRAFFIC CONTROL DETAILS C500 MISC. SITE DETAILS SHEET 1 C501 MISC. SITE DETAILS SHEET 2 C510 ADA DETAILS C520 PAVING DETAILS SHEET 1 C521 PAVING DETAILS SHEET 2 C522 PAVING DETAILS SHEET 3 C523 PAVING DETAILS SHEET 4 C524 PAVING DETAILS SHEET 5 C525 CITY OF GEORGETOWN PAVING DETAILS SHEET 1 C526 CITY OF GEORGETOWN PAVING DETAILS SHEET 2 C530 TRENCHING DETAILS SHEET 1 C531 TRENCHING DETAILS SHEET 2 C540 DRAINAGE DETAILS SHEET 1 C550 TCEQ EROSTION CONTROL DETAILS L500 LANDSCAPE DETAILS Page 17 of 118 CURVE TABLE CURVE C1 C2 C3 C5 RADIUS 1200.00' 7699.44' 7706.94' 7718.94' LENGTH 442.84' 737.35' 659.82' 96.53' DELTA 21°08'38" 5°29'13" 4°54'19" 0°43'00" CHORD BEARING N39° 51' 33"E S57° 59' 57"E S58° 17' 24"E S55° 28' 45"E CHORD LENGTH 440.33' 737.07' 659.62' 96.53' X = 3136553.69 Y = 10218194.11 X = 3135726.22 Y = 10218317.34 N72° 20' 19" W 1 9 7 . 0 5 ' N 1 6 ° 5 6 ' 3 5 " E 2 5 0 . 1 0 ' N77° 4 4 ' 5 6 " E 1 3 2 . 5 4 ' S2 9 ° 1 7 ' 2 0 " W 2 4 9 . 7 8 ' C1 C2 N2 1 ° 1 2 ' 1 0 " W 2 8 4 . 4 0 ' N2 1 ° 0 0 ' 5 4 " W 3 5 1 . 7 6 ' N13° 43' 01"W 26.54' C37.50' X = 3136149.28 Y = 10217638.25 X = 3135928.62 Y = 10218584.70 10.25' 102. 7 8 ' L1 C5 16.38' 3.12' L2 S1 6 ° 5 6 ' 3 5 " W 9 8 . 7 1 ' 1 2 2 . 0 3 ' S2 1 ° 4 6 ' 2 0 " E 2 1 0 . 1 0 ' S2 0 ° 3 9 ' 5 2 " E 2 8 9 . 1 1 ' N2 1 ° 4 6 ' 2 0 " W 2 0 4 . 9 1 ' N2 0 ° 3 9 ' 5 2 " W 2 8 1 . 5 4 ' N58° 09' 09"W 313.74' N2 1 ° 0 0 ' 5 4 " W 3 0 5 . 9 7 ' S2 0 ° 3 9 ' 5 2 " E 1 8 2 . 9 5 ' N3 2 ° 0 0 ' 0 3 " E 3 5 4 . 4 0 ' S3 2 ° 0 0 ' 0 3 " W 3 6 1 . 9 6 ' L3 410.51' 15.00' 214.31' 231.04' 15.83' 8.72' N60° 42' 40"W 20.00' 20.00' 57 . 5 0 ' S73° 03' 21 " E 7 6 . 5 0 ' S17° 50' 38"W 31.84' 76.01' 121.04' 3 0 . 8 8 ' LINE TABLE LINE L1 L2 L3 BEARING S34° 09' 46"W N73° 03' 25"W N72° 20' 19"W DISTANCE 12.00' 2.72' 24.48' SHEET 1 OF 2 ENGINEERING & SURVEYING8 SPENCER ROAD SUITE 100BOERNE, TEXAS 78006OFFICE: 830.249.0600 FAX:830.249.0099 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS LAND PLANNERS CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS CONSULTANTS TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-004512 SCALE: 1"=60' 0 30'60'90'120' P.O. BOX 54 LEGEND D.P.R.WILLIAMSON COUNTY DEED & PLAT RECORDS O.P.R. VOLUMEVOL. PG. R.O.W. CL CENTER LINE EASEMENT BUILDING SETBACK WILLIAMSON COUNTY OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS PAGE RIGHT-OF-WAY OWNERS: PENCE INVESTMENTS, LTD BERT PENCE, PRESIDENT 708 RIO GRANDE AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701 JOSEPH HOOVER, CTX, LLC JOSEPH R. HOOVER, MANAGER 4203 NORTH HILLS DRIVE AUSTIN, TEXAS 78731 ACREAGE:8.107 ACRES PATENT SURVEY: ANTONIO FLORES SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 235 SUBMITTAL DATE:August 16, 2021 AGENT:DAVID MEYER JR. QT SOUTH LLC 4705 S. 129TH EAST AVE TULSA, OKLAHOMA 74134 ENGINEER:JOSHUA J. VALENTA, P.E. TX REG. NO. 114592 MATKINHOOVER ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING 8 SPENCER LN , SUITE 100 BOERNE, TEXAS 78006 PHONE: 830-249-0600 FIRM REG. NO. F-004512 SURVEYOR:KYLE L. PRESSLER #6528 MATKINHOOVER ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING 8 SPENCER LN, SUITE 100 BOERNE, TEXAS 78006 PHONE: 830-249-0600 TEXAS REG. NO. 6550 BEARING BASIS:TEXAS STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, CENTRAL ZONE 4203 NAD 83 NUMBER OF BLOCKS: 1 NUMBER OF LOTS:1 (7.955 ACRES) PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE AREA TABLE TOTAL PLAT AREA 7.955 ACRES 346,302 S.F. STREET R.O.W. DEDICATION 0.152 ACRES 6621 S.F. TOTAL BLOCKS 1 TOTAL LOTS 1 8.107 ACRE TRACT OF LAND, LOCATED IN THE ANTONIO FLORES SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 235, PATENTED IN CONFLICT WITH THE O. PERRY SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 10, WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, SITUATED IN THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN AND BEING A PORTION OF A CALLED 29.476 ACRE TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED AS TRACT 1, IN DOCUMENT NO. 2015085305, OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, ALL OF A CALLED 0.34 ACRE TRACT OF LAND AND A CALLED 0.34 ACRE TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED AS TRACT 1 AND TRACT 2, IN DOCUMENT NO. 2017110177, OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, AND ALL OF A CALLED 0.57 ACRE TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2017113893, OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY. FINAL PLAT INNER LOOP ADDITION PHASE 2 FOUND 3/8" IRON ROD WITH AN "OPC" PLASTIC CAP FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD PROPOSED VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION 0.146 ACRES U . S . H I G H W A Y 8 1 ( V O L . 2 7 9 , P G . 1 4 7 , D . R . W . C . T . ) N O R T H A U S T I N A V E N U E S P U R 1 5 8 V A R I A B L E W I D T H R I G H T - O F - W A Y INNER LOOP DRIVE (DOC. NO. 2005068319 O.P.R.) 120' WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY INNER LOOP ADDITION PHASE 1 LOT 1 (REMAINING PORTION OF A CALLED 29.476 ACRES TRACT 1 PENCE INVESTMENTS, LTD. & JOSEPH HOOVER/CTX, LLC DOC. NO. 2015085305 O.P.R.) CALLED 24.74 ACRES DENNIS BUSCH, TRUSTEE (DOC. NO. 2009043467 O.P.R.) CALLED 2.10 ACRES NEW LIFE MINISTRY OF GEORGETOWN, INC (DOC. NO. 9667620 O.P.R.) CALLED 2.51 ACRES BUEN PERRO HOLDINGS, LLC (DOC. NO. 2016071656 O.P.R.) 12 0 ' 60 ' 60 ' CL CL 12 0 ' 60 ' 60 ' D.R.WILLIAMSON COUNTY DEED RECORDS STREET TABLE STREET NAME CLASSIFICATION TYPE RIGHT-OF-WAY DIMENSION PAVEMENT DIMENSION CURB TYPE PEDESTRIAN CLEAR ZONE DESIGN SPEED NE INNER LOOP MAJOR ARTERIAL 135 FOOT 90 FEET VERTICAL 6 FEET 45 MPH NORTH AUSTIN AVE MINOR ARTERIAL 110 FOOT 66 FEET VERTICAL 6 FEET 40 MPH BENCHMARK LIST BM #100 SCRIBED "X" ON BACK OF CURB IN THE NORTHWEST R.O.W. OF U.S. HIGHWAY 81- BEARS S 20° 52' 28" W 138.20' FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. GRID X: 3135749.86 GRID Y: 10218685.71 ELEV:742.37' BM #101 SCRIBED "X" ON A CONCRETE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE IN THE NORTHEAST R.O.W. OF INNER LOOP DRIVE BEARS N 20° 11' 47" E, 98.85' FROM THE EAST CORNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. GRID X: 3136587.81 GRID Y: 10218286.88 ELEV:739.80' BM #101 BM #100 BENCHMARK INT E R S T A T E 3 5 NE I N N E R L O O P TRACKING NO.: 2021-28-FP LOT 1 BLOCK A 7.955 ACRES P.O.B. N21° 04' 06"W 0.67' INNER LOOP DRIVE N. A U S T I N A V E DETAIL "A" FOUND TXDOT MONUMENT DETAIL "A" LOT 1 BLOCK A 8.107 ACRES N.T.S. PRELIMINARY FOR REVIEW. THIS DOCUMENT IS RELEASED FOR THE PURPOSE OF REVIEW UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF JOSHUA J. VALENTA, P.E. TX REG. NO. 114592 ON 8/16/2021. IT IS NOT TO BE USED FOR BIDDING, PERMIT, OR CONSTRUCTION 15' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (TO BE DEDICATED BY THIS PLAT) SET 1/2" IRON ROD WITH A YELLOW "MATKIN-HOOVER ENG & SURVEY" PLASTIC CAP DOCUMENTDOC. NO.NUMBER PERMANENT UTILITY EASEMENT CITY OF GEORGETOWN (DOC. NO. 9616339, O.P.R.) 15' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (TO BE DEDICATED BY THIS PLAT) LOCATION MAP SCALE : 1" = 2500' S H 1 3 0 GEORGE T O W N CITY LIM I T S GEORGE T O W N ETJ N A U S T I N A V E ( U S 8 1 ) GEORGE T O W N CITY LIM I T S GEORGE T O W N ETJ GE O R G E T O W N CIT Y L I M I T S GEO R G E T O W N ET J SITE CL CL MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE IMPERVIOUS COVER CALCULATIONS (%=[0.70 × 5 ACRES] + [0.55 × (TOTAL ACREAGE - 5 ACRES)] / TOTAL ACREAGE × 100) TOTAL ACRES = 7.955 5.000 ACRES @ 70% = 3.5 ACRES (152,460 SQFT) 2.955 ACRES @ 55% = 1.625 ACRES (71,351 SQFT) TOTAL IMPERVIOUS COVER ALLOWED: 5.125 ACRES (223,811 SQFT) 64.4% OF LOT 1, BLOCK A 15 ' PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION 0.006 ACRES 79 . 5 ' 67' 55.8' 120' 64.29' 55.8' 120' 64.29' VARIABLE WIDTH DRAINAGE EASEMENT 15' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT 15' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT ACCESS EASEMENT ACCESS EASEMENT Page 18 of 118 ENGINEERING& SURVEYING8 SPENCER ROAD SUITE 100BOERNE, TEXAS 78006OFFICE: 830.249.0600 FAX:830.249.0099 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS LAND PLANNERS CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS CONSULTANTS TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-004512 FINAL PLAT INNER LOOP ADDITION PHASE 2 CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL: THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON THAT I, NANCY RISTER, CLERK OF THE COUNTY COURT OF SAID COUNTY, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT IN WRITING, WITH ITS CERTIFICATION OF AUTHENTICATION, WAS FILED FOR RECORD IN MY OFFICE ON THE _____ DAY OF _____________ A.D., 20___. AT _____ O,CLOCK __M. AND DULY RECORDED ON THE ___ DAY OF _____________ A.D., 20_____ AT ______ O'CLOCK __M. IN THE PLAT RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, IN DOCUMENT NO. ________________. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL OF THE COUNTY COURT OF SAID COUNTY, AT OFFICE IN GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, THE DATE LAST ABOVE WRITTEN. NANCY RISTER, CLERK, COUNTY COURT WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS BY:_______________________________________________ DEPUTY P.O. BOX 54 SHEET 2 OF 2 TRACKING NO.: 2021-28-FP DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED DESCRIPTION, OF A 8.107 ACRE TRACT OF LAND, LOCATED IN THE ANTONIO FLORES SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 235, PATENTED IN CONFLICT WITH THE O. PERRY SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 10, WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, SITUATED IN THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN AND BEING A PORTION OF A CALLED 29.476 ACRE TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED AS TRACT 1, IN DOCUMENT NO. 2015085305, OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, ALL OF A CALLED 0.34 ACRE TRACT OF LAND AND A CALLED 0.34 ACRE TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED AS TRACT 1 AND TRACT 2, IN DOCUMENT NO. 2017110177, OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, AND ALL OF A CALLED 0.57 ACRE TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2017113893, OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS. SAID 8.107 ACRE TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A FOUND 1/2” IRON ROD IN THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF U.S. HIGHWAY NO. 81, AS DEDICATED IN VOLUME 279, PAGE 147, OF THE DEED RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, ALSO KNOWN AS, SPUR 185 AND N. AUSTIN AVENUE, FOR THE NORTH CORNER OF SAID 0.57 ACRE TRACT OF LAND, THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 1, AND THE WEST CORNER OF A CUTBACK INTERSECTION BETWEEN SAID U.S. HIGHWAY NO. 81 AND INNER LOOP DRIVE AS DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2005068319, OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, FROM WHICH A FOUND TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, TYPE II CONCRETE MONUMENT, BEARS N 21° 04' 06” W, A DISTANCE OF 0.67 FEET; THENCE, N 77° 44' 56” E, WITH SAID CUTBACK, THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 1, A DISTANCE OF 132.54 FEET, TO A FOUND 3/8” IRON ROD WITH AN ORANGE PLASTIC CAP, FOR THE EAST CORNER OF SAID CUTBACK, THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 1, AND A NON-TANGENT CORNER OF SAID INNER LOOP DRIVE; THENCE, WITH THE COMMON LINE BETWEEN SAID INNER LOOP DRIVE, SAID TRACT 1, TRACT 2 AND SAID 29.476 ACRE TRACT, BEING A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 7699.44 FEET, AN ARC LENGTH OF 737.35 FEET, A DELTA ANGLE OF 5° 29' 13” AND A CHORD THAT BEARS, S 57° 59' 57” E, A DISTANCE OF 737.07 FEET TO A FOUND 3/8” IRON ROD WITH AN ORANGE PLASTIC CAP, FOR THE EAST CORNER OF THIS TRACT AND IN THE PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF AUSTIN AVENUE, AS SHOWN AND DESCRIBED IN THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN ORDINANCE NO. 2016-28; THENCE, WITH SAID PROPOSED CENTERLINE, OVER AND ACROSS SAID 29.476 ACRES THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES: S 29° 17' 20” W, A DISTANCE OF 249.78 FEET, TO A FOUND 3/8” IRON ROD WITH AN ORANGE PLASTIC CAP FOR A TANGENT CORNER OF SAID PROPOSED CENTERLINE, AND WITH A TANGENT CURVE TO THE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1200.00 FEET, AN ARC LENGTH OF 442.84 FEET, A DELTA ANGLE OF 21° 08' 38” AND A CHORD THAT BEARS, S 39° 51' 33” W, A DISTANCE OF 440.33 FEET, TO A FOUND 3/8” IRON ROD WITH AN ORANGE PLASTIC CAP, IN THE EAST LINE OF A CALLED 24.74 ACRE TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2009043467, OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, THE TERMINUS OF SAID PROPOSED CENTERLINE, IN THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID 29.476 ACRE TRACT AND FOR THE SOUTH CORNER OF THIS TRACT; THENCE: N 21° 12' 10” W, WITH THE COMMON LINE BETWEEN SAID 24.74 ACRE TRACT AND SAID 29.476 ACRE TRACT, A DISTANCE OF 284.40 FEET, TO A FOUND 1/2” IRON ROD, FOR THE SOUTHEAST CORNER A CALLED 2.10 ACRE TRACT, AS DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT NO. 9667620, OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS AND AN ANGLE OF THIS TRACT; THENCE: N 13° 43' 04” W, WITH THE COMMON LINE BETWEEN SAID 2.10 ACRE TRACT AND SAID 29.476 ACRE TRACT, A DISTANCE OF 26.54 FEET, TO A FOUND 1/2” IRON ROD, FOR THE SOUTHEAST CORNER A CALLED 2.51 ACRE TRACT, AS DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2016071656, OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID 2.10 ACRE TRACT AND AN ANGLE OF THIS TRACT; THENCE: N 21° 00' 54” W, WITH THE COMMON LINE BETWEEN SAID 2.51 ACRE TRACT AND SAID 29.476 ACRE TRACT, A DISTANCE OF 351.76 FEET, TO A FOUND 1/2” IRON ROD, FOR THE SOUTH CORNER OF SAID 0.57 ACRE TRACT, THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID 2.51 ACRE TRACT AND AN INTERIOR CORNER OF THIS TRACT; THENCE: N 72° 20' 19” W, WITH THE COMMON LINE BETWEEN SAID 2.51 ACRE TRACT AND SAID 0.57 ACRE TRACT, A DISTANCE OF 197.05 FEET, TO A FOUND 1/2” IRON ROD, IN THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID U.S. HIGHWAY NO. 81, FOR THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID 0.57 ACRE TRACT, THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID 2.51 ACRE TRACT AND THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF THIS TRACT; THENCE: N 16° 56' 35” E, WITH THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID U.S. HIGHWAY NO. 81 AND THE WEST LINE OF SAID 0.57 ACRE TRACT, A DISTANCE OF 250.10 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING CONTAINING 8.107 ACRES OF LAND SITUATED IN WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS. TXDOT NOTES 1.FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO STATE RIGHT OF WAY, THE PROPERTY OWNER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ADEQUATE SET-BACK AND/OR SOUND ABATEMENT MEASURES FOR FUTURE NOISE MITIGATION. 2.MAXIMUM ACCESS POINTS TO STATE HIGHWAY FROM THIS PROPERTY WILL BE REGULATED AS DIRECTED BY “ACCESS MANAGEMENT MANUAL”. THIS PROPERTY IS ELIGIBLE FOR A MAXIMUM TOTAL OF 1 ACCESS POINT(S) ALONG NORTH AUSTIN AVENUE (SPUR 158) BASED ON THE OVERALL PLATTED HIGHWAY FRONTAGE OF 382 LINEAR FEET AND A MAXIMUM TOTAL OF 2 ACCESS POINT(S) ALONG NORTHEAST INNER LOOP BASED ON THE OVERALL PLATTED HIGHWAY FRONTAGE OF 1081 LINEAR FEET. 3.IF SIDEWALKS ARE REQUIRED BY APPROPRIATE CITY ORDINANCE, A SIDEWALK PERMIT MUST BE APPROVED BY TXDOT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION WITHIN STATE RIGHT-OF-WAY. LOCATIONS OF SIDEWALKS WITHIN STATE RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE DIRECTED BY TXDOT. STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON I, KYLE L. PRESSLER, A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR, LICENSED BY THE STATE OF TEXAS, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT IS TRUE AND CORRECTLY MADE FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE ON THE GROUND OF THE PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED HEREON, AND THAT THERE ARE NO APPARENT DISCREPANCIES, CONFLICTS, OVERLAPPING OF IMPROVEMENTS, VISIBLE UTILITY LINES OR ROADS IN PLACE, EXCEPT AS SHOWN ON THE ACCOMPANYING PLAT, AND THAT THE CORNER MONUMENTS SHOWN THEREON WERE PROPERLY PLACED UNDER MY SUPERVISION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS. KYLE L. PRESSLER REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR #6528 MATKINHOOVER ENGINEERING & SURVEYING PREPARED: August 16, 2021 A 8.107 ACRE TRACT OF LAND, LOCATED IN THE ANTONIO FLORES SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 235, PATENTED IN CONFLICT WITH THE O. PERRY SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 10, WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, SITUATED IN THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN AND BEING A PORTION OF A CALLED 29.476 ACRE TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED AS TRACT 1, IN DOCUMENT NO. 2015085305, OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, ALL OF A CALLED 0.34 ACRE TRACT OF LAND AND A CALLED 0.34 ACRE TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED AS TRACT 1 AND TRACT 2, IN DOCUMENT NO. 2017110177, OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, AND ALL OF A CALLED 0.57 ACRE TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2017113893, OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY. STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON I, JOSHUA J. VALENTA, A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER IN THE STATE OF TEXAS, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SUBDIVISION IS IN THE EDWARDS AQUIFER RECHARGE ZONE AND IS NOT ENCROACHED BY A ZONE A FLOOD AREA, AS DENOTED HEREIN, AND AS DEFINED BY FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION FLOOD HAZARD BOUNDARY MAP, COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER 480668 0291 F, EFFECTIVE DATE DECEMBER 20, 2019, AND THAT EACH LOT CONFORMS TO THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN REGULATIONS. THE FULLY DEVELOPED, CONCENTRATED STORMWATER RUNOFF RESULTING FROM THE ONE HUNDRED (100) YEAR FREQUENCY STORM IS CONTAINED WITHIN THE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS SHOWN AND/ OR PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY DEDICATED BY THIS PLAT. TO CERTIFY WHICH, WITNESS MY HEAD AND SEAL AT BOERNE, TEXAS THIS ___________ DAY OF ________, 20_____. JOSHUA J. VALENTA LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER # 114592 MATKINHOOVER ENGINEERING & SURVEYING SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE ENGINEER'S CERTICIFICATE NOTES 1.BEARING SYSTEM FOR THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON THE STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, NORTH AMERICAN DATUM OF 1983 (2011), TEXAS CENTRAL ZONE 4203, US SURVEY FOOT, GRID. 2.UTILITY PROVIDERS FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT ARE WATER: CITY OF GEORGETOWN, WASTEWATER /SEPTIC: CITY OF GEORGETOWN, AND ELECTRIC: CITY OF GEORGETOWN. 3.ALL STRUCTURES/ OBSTRUCTIONS ARE PROHIBITED IN DRAINAGE EASEMENTS. 4.THERE ARE NO AREAS WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THIS SUBDIVISION IN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN AS DEFINED BY FIRM MAP NUMBER 48491 C0291F, EFFECTIVE DATE OF DECEMBER 20, 2019. 5.IN ORDER TO PROMOTE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM A STRUCTURE, THE SLAB ELEVATION SHOULD BE BUILT AT LEAST ONE-FOOT ABOVE THE SURROUNDING GROUND, AND THE GROUND SHOULD BE GRADED AWAY FROM THE STRUCTURE AT A SLOPE OF 1 /2" PER FOOT FOR A DISTANCE OF AT LEAST 10 FEET. 6.ALL SEDIMENTATION, FILTRATION, DETENTION, AND/OR RETENTION BASINS AND RELATED APPURTENANCES SHOWN SHALL BE SITUATED WITHIN A DRAINAGE EASEMENT OR DRAINAGE LOT. THE OWNERS, HOA, OR ASSIGNEES OF HE TRACTS UPON WHICH ARE LOCATED SUCH EASEMENTS, APPURTENANCES, AND DETENTION FACILITIES SHALL MAINTAIN SAME AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR MAINTENANCE, ROUTINE INSPECTION, AND UPKEEP. 7.A 15-FOOT PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT IS DEDICATED ALONG ALL STREET FRONTAGES WITHIN THIS PLAT. 8.THE MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS COVER PER NON-RESIDENTIAL LOT IS ACCORDING TO THE FOLLOWING TABLE: 9.THE LANDOWNER ASSUMES ALL RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, OR ROAD WIDENING EASEMENTS. BY PLACING ANYTHING IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OR ROAD WIDENING EASEMENTS, THE LANDOWNER INDEMNIFIES AND HOLDS THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, WILLIAMSON COUNTY, THEIR OFFICERS, AGENTS AND EMPLOYEES HARMLESS FROM ANY LIABILITY OWING TO PROPERTY DEFECTS OR NEGLIGENCE NOT ATTRIBUTABLE TO THEM AND ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS MAY BE REMOVED BY THE CITY AND/OR COUNTY AND THAT THE OWNER OF THE IMPROVEMENTS WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE RELOCATION AND/OR REPLACEMENT OF THE IMPROVEMENTS. 10.THE BUILDING OF ALL STREETS, ROADS, AND OTHER PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES AND ANY BRIDGES OR CULVERTS NECESSARY TO BE CONSTRUCTED OR PLACED IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNERS OF THE TRACT OF LAND COVERED BY THIS PLAT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS PRESCRIBED BY THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN AND/OR WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS. NEITHER THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN NOR WILLIAMSON COUNTY ASSUMES ANY OBLIGATION TO BUILD ANY OF THE STREETS, ROADS, OR OTHER PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES SHOWN ON THIS PLAT OR OF CONSTRUCTING ANY OF THE BRIDGES OR DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. NEITHER THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN NOR WILLIAMSON COUNTY ASSUMES ANY RESPONSIBILITY OF THE BRIDGES OR DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. NEITHER THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN NOR WILLIAMSON COUNTY ASSUMES ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR DRAINAGE WAYS OR EASEMENTS IN THE SUBDIVISION, OTHER THAN THOSE DRAINING OR PROTECTING THE ROAD SYSTEM AND STREETS IN THEIR RESPECTIVE JURISDICTIONS. 11.NEITHER THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN NOR WILLIAMSON COUNTY ASSUMES ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OF REPRESENTATIONS BY OTHER PARTIES IN THIS PLAT. FLOODPLAIN DATA, IN PARTICULAR, MAY CHANGE DEPENDING ON SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENT. IT IS FURTHER UNDERSTOOD THAT THE OWNERS OF THE TRACT OF LAND COVERED BY THIS PLAT MUST INSTALL AT THEIR OWN EXPENSE ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AND SIGNAGE THAT MAY BE REQUIRED BEFORE THE STREETS IN THE SUBDIVISION HAVE FINALLY BEEN ACCEPTED FOR MAINTENANCE BY THE CITY AND/ OR COUNTY. 12.RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENTS FOR WIDENING ROADWAYS OR IMPROVING DRAINAGE SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE LANDOWNER UNTIL ROAD OR DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ARE ACTUALLY CONSTRUCTED ON THE PROPERTY. THE CITY AND/OR COUNTY HAVE THE RIGHT AT ANY TIME TO TAKE POSSESSION OF ANY ROAD WIDENING EASEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION, IMPROVEMENT, OR MAINTENANCE OF THE ADJACENT ROAD. 13.THIS PLAT IS SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN WATER CONSERVATION ORDINANCE. 14.THE SUBDIVISION SUBJECT TO THIS APPLICATION IS SUBJECT TO THE WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN. 15.A GEOLOGIC ASSESSMENT, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS, WAS COMPLETED ON JANUARY 29, 2020. ANY SPRINGS AND STREAMS AS IDENTIFIED IN THE GEOLOGIC ASSESSMENT ARE SHOWN HEREIN. 16.THERE IS HEREBY GRANTED FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF THE PUBLIC A CONTINUING AVIGATION EASEMENT FOR THE FREE AND UNOBSTRUCTED FLIGHT OF AIRCRAFT (WHICH TERM SHALL INCLUDE ANY CONTRIVANCE NOW OR HEREAFTER USED FOR FLIGHT THROUGH THE AIR) AND THE RIGHT OF FLIGHT FOR THE PASSAGE OF AIRCRAFT IN THE AIR SPACE ABOVE THE SURFACE OF THE PROPERTY, TOGETHER WITH SUCH NOISE AND OTHER EFFECTS AS MAY BE INHERENT IN THE OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT LANDING AT, TAKING OFF FROM, OR ENGAGED IN OTHER FLIGHT ACTIVITIES AT THE GEORGETOWN MUNICIPAL AIRPORT. 17.GRANTERS DO HEREBY GRANT AND CONVEY AN EASEMENT FOR THE APPROACH ZONES AND TRANSITIONAL ZONE AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED IN SECTION 12.36 OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN CODE OF ORDINANCES. 18.THESE EASEMENTS SHALL BE PERPETUAL AND SHALL BE BINDING ON GRANTOR AND ITS ASSIGNS, HEIRS, AND SUCCESSORS. STATE OF TEXAS { KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON { I, BERT PENCE, PRESIDENT FOR PENCE INVESTMENTS, LTD, OWNER OF THE CERTAIN 8.107 ACRE TRACT OF LAND, SHOWN HEREON AND DESCRIBED IN A DEED RECORDED IN DOCUMENTS NO. 2015085305, 2017110177, AND 2017113893, OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, AND DO HEREBY STATE THAT THERE ARE NO LIEN HOLDERS OF THE CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND, AND DO HEREBY SUBDIVIDE SAID TRACT AS SHOWN HEREON, AND DO HEREBY CONSENT TO ALL PLAT NOTE REQUIREMENTS SHOWN HEREON , AND DO HEREBY DEDICATE TO WILLIAMSON COUNTY , THE STREETS, ALLEYS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY, EASEMENTS AND PUBLIC PLACES SHOWN HEREON FOR SUCH PUBLIC PURPOSED AS THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN MAY DEEM APPROPRIATE. THIS SUBDIVISION IS TO BE KNOWN AS INNER LOOP ADDITION PHASE 2. TO CERTIFY WHICH, WITNESS BY MY HAND THIS DAY OF , 20 . BERT PENCE, PRESIDENT PENCE INVESTMENTS, LTD 708 RIO GRANDE AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701 STATE OF TEXAS { KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON { BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED, A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID COUNTY AND STATE, ON THIS DAY PERSONALLY APPEARED BERT PENCE, KNOWN TO ME TO BE THE PERSON WHOSE NAME IS SUBSCRIBED TO THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE THIS DAY OF , 20 . NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS MY COMMISSION EXPIRES ON: I, SOFIA NELSON, PLANNING DIRECTOR OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THIS PLAT IS APPROVED FOR FILING OF RECORD WITH THE COUNTY CLERK OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS. SOFIA NELSON, PLANNING DIRECTOR DATE THIS SUBDIVISION TO BE KNOWN AS INNER LOOP ADDITION PHASE 2 HAS BEEN ACCEPTED AND APPROVED FOR FILING OF RECORD WITH THE COUNTY CLERK OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE GEORGETOWN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ON THE DAY OF , 20 . TRAVIS PERTHUIS, CHAIRMAN DATE KAYLAH McCORD, SECRETARY DATE BENCHMARK LIST BM #100 SCRIBED "X" ON BACK OF CURB IN THE NORTHWEST R.O.W. OF U.S. HIGHWAY 81- BEARS S 20° 52' 28" W 138.20' FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. GRID X: 3135749.86 GRID Y: 10218685.71 ELEV:742.37' BM #101 SCRIBED "X" ON A CONCRETE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE IN THE NORTHEAST R.O.W. OF INNER LOOP DRIVE BEARS N 20° 11' 47" E, 98.85' FROM THE EAST CORNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. GRID X: 3136587.81 GRID Y: 10218286.88 ELEV:739.80' STATE OF TEXAS { KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON { I, JOSEPH R. HOOVER, MANAGER FOR JOSEPH HOOVER, CTX, LLC, OWNER OF THE CERTAIN 8.107 ACRE TRACT OF LAND, SHOWN HEREON AND DESCRIBED IN A DEED RECORDED IN DOCUMENTS NO. 2015085305, 2017110177, AND 2017113893, OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, AND DO HEREBY STATE THAT THERE ARE NO LIEN HOLDERS OF THE CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND, AND DO HEREBY SUBDIVIDE SAID TRACT AS SHOWN HEREON, AND DO HEREBY CONSENT TO ALL PLAT NOTE REQUIREMENTS SHOWN HEREON , AND DO HEREBY DEDICATE TO WILLIAMSON COUNTY , THE STREETS, ALLEYS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY, EASEMENTS AND PUBLIC PLACES SHOWN HEREON FOR SUCH PUBLIC PURPOSED AS THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN MAY DEEM APPROPRIATE. THIS SUBDIVISION IS TO BE KNOWN AS INNER LOOP ADDITION PHASE 2. TO CERTIFY WHICH, WITNESS BY MY HAND THIS DAY OF , 20 . JOSEPH R. HOOVER, MANAGER JOSEPH HOOVER, CTX, LLC 4203 NORTH HILLS DRIVE AUSTIN, TEXAS 78731 STATE OF TEXAS { KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON { BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED, A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID COUNTY AND STATE, ON THIS DAY PERSONALLY APPEARED JOSEPH R. HOOVER, KNOWN TO ME TO BE THE PERSON WHOSE NAME IS SUBSCRIBED TO THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE THIS DAY OF , 20 . NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS MY COMMISSION EXPIRES ON: PRELIMINARY FOR REVIEW. THIS DOCUMENT IS RELEASED FOR THE PURPOSE OF REVIEW UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF JOSHUA J. VALENTA, P.E. TX REG. NO. 114592 ON 5/13/2021. IT IS NOT TO BE USED FOR BIDDING, PERMIT, OR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY FOR REVIEW. THIS DOCUMENT IS RELEASED FOR THE PURPOSE OF REVIEW UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF JOSHUA K. PRESSLER, RPLS. TX REG. NO. 6528 ON 5/13/2021. IT IS NOT TO BE USED FOR BIDDING, PERMIT, OR CONSTRUCTION BASED UPON THE ABOVE REPRESENTATIONS OF THE ENGINEER OR SURVEYOR WHOSE SEAL IS AFFIXED HERETO, AND AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PLAT AS REPRESENTED BY THE SAID ENGINEER OR SURVEYOR, I FIND THAT THIS PLAT COMPLIES WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 15.44, FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION, OF THE GEORGETOWN MUNICIPAL CODE. THIS CERTIFICATION IS MADE SOLELY UPON SUCH REPRESENTATIONS AND SHOULD NOT BE RELIED UPON FOR VERIFICATIONS OF THE FACTS ALLEGED. THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN DISCLAIMS ANY RESPONSIBILITY TO ANY MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC OR INDEPENDENT VERIFICATIONS OF THE REPRESENTATION, FACTUAL OR OTHERWISE, CONTAINED IN THIS PLAT AND THE DOCUMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH IT. _____________________________________________ _______________________________ GLEN HOLCOMB, BUILDING OFFICIAL DATE CITY OF GEORGETOWN INT E R S T A T E 3 5 NE I N N E R L O O P LOCATION MAP SCALE : 1" = 2500' S H 1 3 0 GEORGE T O W N CITY LIM I T S GEORGE T O W N ETJ N A U S T I N A V E ( U S 8 1 ) GEORGE T O W N CITY LIM I T S GEORGE T O W N ETJ GE O R G E T O W N CIT Y L I M I T S GEO R G E T O W N ET J SITE (%= [0.70 × 5 ACRES] + [0.55 × (TOTAL ACREAGE - 5 ACRES)] / TOTAL ACREAGE × 100) TOTAL ACRES = 7.955 5.000 ACRES @ 70% = 3.5 ACRES (152,460 SQFT) 2.955 ACRES @ 55% = 1.625 ACRES (71,351 SQFT) TOTAL IMPERVIOUS COVER ALLOWED: 5.125 ACRES (223,811 SQFT) 64.4% OF LOT 1, BLOCK A Page 19 of 118 ← ↑ N 40 20 0 40 80 C020 SURVEY PLAN Qu i k T r i p N o . A SHEET TITLE: SHEET NUMBER: DIVISION: DESIGNED BY: 1 © COPYRIGHT QUIKTRIP CORPORATION 2011 ANY UNAUTHORIZED USE, REPRODUCTION, PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR SALE IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. OR I G I N A L I S S U E D A T E : PROTOTYPE: VERSION: PROJECT NO.: DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY: RE V D A T E D E S C R I P T I O N B C D E F G H J K L M N P Q A B C D E F G H J K L M N P Q 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 41 8 4 SE C I N N E R L O O P R D & N A U S T I N A V E GE O R G E T O W N , T E X A S 20-5061 82 001 CS SA/KP N EN G I N E E R I N G & S U R V E Y I N G 8 S P E N C E R R O A D S U I T E 3 0 0 BO E R N E , T E X A S 7 8 0 0 6 OF F I C E : 8 3 0 . 2 4 9 . 0 6 0 0 F A X : 8 3 0 . 2 4 9 . 0 0 9 9 CI V I L E N G I N E E R S S U R V E Y O R S L A N D P L A N N E R S CO N S T R U C T I O N M A N A G E R S C O N S U L T A N T S BO E R N E , T E X A S R E G I S T E R E D S U R V E Y I N G F I R M F - 1 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 BO E R N E , T E X A S R E G I S T E R E D E N G I N E E R I N G F I R M F - 0 0 4 5 1 2 33 0 3 S H E L L R O A D S U I T E 3 GE O R G E T O W N , T E X A S 7 8 6 2 8 OF F I C E : 5 1 2 . 8 6 8 . 2 2 4 4 HE A D Q U A R T E R S GE O R G E T O W N , T E X A S R E G I S T E R E D S U R V E Y I N G F I R M F - 1 0 1 9 4 3 4 7 City of Georgetown Project No.: 2021-38-SDP Page 20 of 118 ” ” ”” ”” ” ”” ” ”” ”” ”” ”” ”” ”C021 SURVEY PLAN Qu i k T r i p N o . A SHEET TITLE: SHEET NUMBER: DIVISION: DESIGNED BY: 1 © COPYRIGHT QUIKTRIP CORPORATION 2011 ANY UNAUTHORIZED USE, REPRODUCTION, PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR SALE IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. OR I G I N A L I S S U E D A T E : PROTOTYPE: VERSION: PROJECT NO.: DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY: RE V D A T E D E S C R I P T I O N B C D E F G H J K L M N P Q A B C D E F G H J K L M N P Q 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 41 8 4 SE C I N N E R L O O P R D & N A U S T I N A V E GE O R G E T O W N , T E X A S 20-5061 82 001 CS SA/KP EN G I N E E R I N G & S U R V E Y I N G 8 S P E N C E R R O A D S U I T E 3 0 0 BO E R N E , T E X A S 7 8 0 0 6 OF F I C E : 8 3 0 . 2 4 9 . 0 6 0 0 F A X : 8 3 0 . 2 4 9 . 0 0 9 9 CI V I L E N G I N E E R S S U R V E Y O R S L A N D P L A N N E R S CO N S T R U C T I O N M A N A G E R S C O N S U L T A N T S BO E R N E , T E X A S R E G I S T E R E D S U R V E Y I N G F I R M F - 1 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 BO E R N E , T E X A S R E G I S T E R E D E N G I N E E R I N G F I R M F - 0 0 4 5 1 2 33 0 3 S H E L L R O A D S U I T E 3 GE O R G E T O W N , T E X A S 7 8 6 2 8 OF F I C E : 5 1 2 . 8 6 8 . 2 2 4 4 HE A D Q U A R T E R S GE O R G E T O W N , T E X A S R E G I S T E R E D S U R V E Y I N G F I R M F - 1 0 1 9 4 3 4 7 N– “” “”       EXISTING UTILITIES SURVEY LEGEND ABREVIATION STANDARDS FOR QT SURVEYSEXISTING FEATURES CONTROL LEGEND City of Georgetown Project No.: 2021-38-SDP Page 21 of 118 ← ↑ 15,575 UNLEADED (10.5'Ø) SUBMERGEDPUMP 15,575 UNLEADED (10.5'Ø) SUBMERGEDPUMP 14,068 PRODUCT X (10'Ø) SUBMERGEDPUMP 14,068 PREMIUM (10'Ø) SUBMERGEDPUMP 14,068 DIESEL (10'Ø) SUBMERGEDPUMP G3S (P-106) STORE NO.: 4184 4,993 S.F. BLDG. HT.= 20'-0" VW M VWM Qu i k T r i p N o . A SHEET TITLE: SHEET NUMBER: DIVISION: DESIGNED BY: 1 © COPYRIGHT QUIKTRIP CORPORATION 2011 ANY UNAUTHORIZED USE, REPRODUCTION, PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR SALE IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. OR I G I N A L I S S U E D A T E : PROTOTYPE: VERSION: PROJECT NO.: DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY: RE V DA T E DE S C R I P T I O N B C D E F G H J K L M N P Q A B C D E F G H J K L M N P Q 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 41 8 4 N. A U S T I N A V E & N E I N N E R L O O P GE O R G E T O W N , T E X A S 4184.01 P-106 (05/01/21) 82 001 C. Wood CR JJV Qu i k T r i p N o . A SHEET TITLE: SHEET NUMBER: DIVISION: DESIGNED BY: 1 © COPYRIGHT QUIKTRIP CORPORATION 2011 ANY UNAUTHORIZED USE, REPRODUCTION, PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR SALE IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. OR I G I N A L I S S U E D A T E : PROTOTYPE: VERSION: PROJECT NO.: DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY: RE V DA T E DE S C R I P T I O N B C D E F G H J K L M N P Q A B C D E F G H J K L M N P Q 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 EN G I N E E R I N G & S U R V E Y I N G FOR REVIEW. THIS DOCUMENT IS RELEASED FOR THE PURPOSE OF REVIEW UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF JOSHUA J VALENTA, P.E. #114592 ON 6/21/2021. IT IS NOT TO BE USED FOR BIDDING, PERMIT, OR CONSTRUCTION, SITE PLAN SHEET 1 20 10 0 20 40 SITE LEGEND N MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET C102 SITE DIMENSIONAL CONTROL NOTES ” CITY OF GEORGETOWN PARKING CALCULATIONS C101 08 OF 56 Page 22 of 118 Page 23 of 118 Page 24 of 118 Page 25 of 118 QuikTrip 4184 Fuel Sales Canopy 2022-3-VAR June 21, 2022 | Zoning Board of Adjustment Page 26 of 118 2 Item Under Consideration 2022-3-VAR •Public Hearing and possible action on a Zoning Variance from the fuel sales canopy height limit pursuant to Section 5.04.020 of the Unified Development Code, for the property located at 3201 NE Inner Loop, bearing the legal description of 8.107 acres of land in the Antonio Flores Survey, Abstract Number 10 (2022-3-VAR). Ryan Clark, Planner II Page 27 of 118 3 Page 28 of 118 4 Industrial Subdivision Attached Multi-Family Page 29 of 118 5 Location of Canopy Proposed Site Plan NE Inner Loop N Austin Ave Page 30 of 118 6 17’ height at base, 20’ 6” at top Exhibit of proposed Fuel Sales Canopy Canopy Support Posts Page 31 of 118 7 Zoning Variance The Zoning Board of Adjustment may authorize a Zoning Variance from the requirements of the zoning provisions of this Unified Development Code if the Variance from the terms of the zoning provisions is: •Not contrary to the public interest •Due to special conditions •A literal enforcement of the requirements would result in unnecessary hardship •The spirit of this Code is preserved •Substantial justice done Page 32 of 118 8 Approval Criteria –UDC Section 3.15.030 Criteria for a Variance Complies Partially Complies Does Not Comply 1. Extraordinary Conditions X 2. No Substantial Detriment X 3. Other Property X 4. Applicant’s Actions X 5. Comprehensive Plan X 6. Utilization X 7. Insufficient Findings X Page 33 of 118 9 Approval Criteria 1. Extraordinary Conditions That there are extraordinary or special conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the provisions of this Unified Development Code will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of their land. For example, a Zoning Variance might be justified because of topographic or other special conditions unique to the property and development involved, while it would not be justified due to inconvenience or financial disadvantage. Page 34 of 118 10 Approval Criteria 2. No Substantial Detriment That the granting of the Zoning Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or injurious to other property in the area or to the City in administering this Code. 3. Other Property That the conditions that create the need for the Zoning Variance do not generally apply to other property in the vicinity. Page 35 of 118 11 Industrial Subdivision Attached Multi-Family Page 36 of 118 12 Page 37 of 118 13 Approval Criteria 4. Applicant’s Actions That the conditions that create the need for the Zoning Variance are not the result of the applicant's own actions. 5. Comprehensive Plan That the granting of the Zoning Variance would not substantially conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and the purposes of this Code. Page 38 of 118 14 Approval Criteria 5 –Comprehensive Plan, Urban Corridors •Low-to-moderate building height •Consistent appearance of streetscape and signs Page 39 of 118 15 Approval Criteria 5 –Comprehensive Plan, Urban Corridors –Sign Dimensions per UDC Sec. 10.06 Maximum Height for signs Page 40 of 118 16 Approval Criteria 6. Utilization That because of the conditions that create the need for the Zoning Variance, the application of this Code to the particular piece of property would effectively prohibit or unreasonably restrict the utilization of the property. Page 41 of 118 17 Approval Criteria 7. Insufficient Findings The following types of possible findings do not constitute sufficient grounds for granting a Zoning Variance: •That the property cannot be used for its highest and best use. •That there is a financial or economic hardship. •That there is a self-created hardship by the property owner or their agent. •That the development objectives of the property owner are or will be frustrated. Page 42 of 118 18 Approval Criteria –UDC Section 3.15.030 Criteria for a Variance Complies Partially Complies Does Not Comply 1. Extraordinary Conditions X 2. No Substantial Detriment X 3. Other Property X 4. Applicant’s Actions X 5. Comprehensive Plan X 6. Utilization X 7. Insufficient Findings X Page 43 of 118 19 Public Notifications •11 property owners within the 300’ buffer •Notice in Sun News on Sunday, June 5 •Signs posted on the property •To date, staff has received: •0 written comments IN FAVOR •0 written comments OPPOSED Page 44 of 118 20 Summary •Public Hearing and possible action on a Zoning Variance from the fuel sales canopy height limit pursuant to Section 5.04.020 of the Unified Development Code, for the property located at 3201 NE Inner Loop, bearing the legal description of 8.107 acres of land in the Antonio Flores Survey, Abstract Number 10 (2022-3-VAR). Ryan Clark, Planner II •A supermajority (3/4) vote of the Board are required to grant a Variance. A variance that does not receive four votes is considered denied. (Code of Ord. 2.29.040) •When making a motion, the Board must make a finding of the criteria. Page 45 of 118 City of Georgetown, Texas Zoning Board of Adjustment June 21, 2022 SUBJECT: Public Hearing and possible action on a Zoning Variance from the fuel sales canopy height limit pursuant to Section 5.04.020 of the Unified Development Code, for the property located at 3930 Shell Road, bearing the legal description of 7.970 acres of land in the William Roberts Survey, Abstract Number 524 (2022-4- VAR). Ryan Clark, Planner II ITEM SUMMARY: Overview of Applicant’s Request: The applicant is requesting a variance to the height limit for fuel sales canopies to allow for the overall canopy height of their proposed canopy fronting SH 195 at 3930 Shell Road to be 20 feet tall, a 17.6% variance to the UDC’s limit of 17 feet set in UDC 5.04.020.T.7. Staff’s Analysis: The following are the pertinent sections of the Unified Development Code (UDC) related to this request: UDC Section 5.04.020. – Commercial Use Limitations, T. Fuel Sales, 7: The bottom of the canopy shall be a minimum of 13 feet six inches in height. The maximum height of the overall canopy shall not exceed 17 feet. Staff has reviewed the variance request and the applicant’s stated findings, and has evaluated the request based on the UDC required findings for a variance in accordance with UDC Section 3.15.030, which stated: Required Findings The Zoning Board of Adjustment may authorize a variance from the requirements of the zoning provisions of the UDC if the variance from the terms of the zoning provisions is not contrary to the public interest and, due to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the requirements would result in unnecessary hardship, so the spirit of this Code is preserved, and substantial justice done. No variance shall be granted unless the ZBA finds all of the required findings established in UDC Section 3.15.030.A. Staff has reviewed the submitted Zoning Variance request in accordance with the UDC and other applicable codes. Staff has determined that the request complies with 2 and does not comply with 5 of the 7 required findings established in UDC Section 3.15.030.A for a Zoning Variance as outlined in the attached staff report. Public Comments: As required by the Unified Development Code, all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the subject property were notified of the Zoning Variance request (9 notices), a legal notice advertising the public hearing was placed in the Sun Newspaper (Sunday June 5, 2022) and signs were posted on-site. To date, staff has received 0 written comments in favor, and 0 in opposition to the request. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. The applicant has paid the required application fees. Page 46 of 118 SUBMITTED BY: Ryan Clark, Planner II ATTACHMENTS: Description Type [2022-4-VAR] ZBA Staff Report Cover Memo Exhibit 1 - Location Map Exhibit Exhibit 2 - Conceptual Plan Exhibit Exhibit 3 - Letter of Intent Exhibit Presentation Presentation Page 47 of 118 Zoning Board of Adjustment Planning Department Staff Report 2022-4-VAR QuikTrip 4184 Fuel Sales Northern Canopy Page 1 of 6 Report Date: Friday, June 17, 2022 Case No: 2022-4-VAR Project Planner: Ryan Clark, Planner II Item Details Project Name: QuikTrip 4183 Fuel Sales Northern Canopy Project Location: 3930 Shell Road, within City Council district No. 5. Legal Description: 7.970 acres of land in the William Roberts Survey, Abstract Number 524 Applicant: QT South LLC, c/o David Meyer Property Owner: QT South LLC, c/o David Meyer Request: Zoning Variance to the Fuel Sales Canopy height limit set by UDC Section 5.04.020.T. Case History: This is the first public hearing of this request. Page 48 of 118 Planning Department Staff Report 2022-4-VAR QuikTrip 4184 Fuel Sales Northern Canopy Page 2 of 6 Overview of Applicant’s Request The applicant is requesting a variance to the height limit for fuel sales canopies to allow for the overall canopy height of their proposed canopy fronting SH 195 at 3930 Shell Road to be 20 feet tall, a 17.6% variance to the UDC’s limit of 17 feet set in UDC 5.04.020.T.7. Site Information Location: The subject property is currently located south of the intersection of SH 195 and Shell Rd, and is currently in the development process for a gas station. Physical and Natural Features: The subject property is predominantly flat with little tree coverage. There are no significant environmental or other natural features on site. Future Land Use and Zoning Designations: The subject property has an existing Future Land Use designation of Community Center and is currently zoned General Commercial (C-3) and Highway Gateway Overlay district. Surrounding Properties: The subject property is located at the intersection of two major roadways surrounded by large non- residential properties that are primarily located within the ETJ. Nearby uses along Shell Road include self-storage facility, trucking company, and a church, as well as large residential lots (approximately 10 acre lots) located further to the west. Further to the south there is single-family residential development currently under construction. The Berry Creek Highlands mixed-use master planned community is also currently under construction further north along SH 195. The current zoning, Future Land Use designation, and existing uses of the adjacent properties to the north, south, east, and west are outlined in the table below: DIRECTION ZONING DISTRICT FUTURE LAND USE EXISTING USE North ETJ Community Center Undeveloped (across SH 195) East Agriculture (AG) Community Center Undeveloped South General Commercial (C-3) Community Center Undeveloped West General Commercial (C-3) Community Center Undeveloped Page 49 of 118 Planning Department Staff Report 2022-4-VAR QuikTrip 4184 Fuel Sales Northern Canopy Page 3 of 6 Approval Criteria The following are the pertinent sections of the Unified Development Code (UDC) related to this request: • UDC Section 5.04.020.T restricts the height of Canopies for the Fuel Sales Use to a minimum base height of 13 feet and a maximum height for the top of the canopy to 17 feet. Staff has reviewed the variance request and the applicant’s stated findings, and has evaluated the request based on the UDC required findings for a variance in accordance with UDC Section 3.15.030, which stated: Required Findings The Zoning Board of Adjustment may authorize a variance from the requirements of the zoning provisions of the UDC if the variance from the terms of the zoning provisions is not contrary to the public interest and, due to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the requirements would result in unnecessary hardship, so the spirit of this Code is preserved, and substantial justice done. No variance shall be granted unless the ZBA finds all of the required findings established in UDC Section 3.15.030.A. Staff has reviewed the submitted Zoning Variance request in accordance with the UDC and other applicable codes. Staff has determined that the request complies with 1 and does not comply with 6 of the 7 required findings established in UDC Section 3.15.030.A for a Zoning Variance as outlined below. Page 50 of 118 Planning Department Staff Report 2022-4-VAR QuikTrip 4184 Fuel Sales Northern Canopy Page 4 of 6 ZONING MAP VARIANCE APPROVAL CRITERIA 1. Extraordinary Conditions That there are extraordinary or special conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the provisions of this Unified Development Code will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of their land. For example, a Zoning Variance might be justified because of topographic or other special conditions unique to the property and development involved, while it would not be justified due to inconvenience or financial disadvantage. Does Not Comply There are no extraordinary or special conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the provisions of this Unified Development Code will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of their land. The applicants stated reasoning for the ability to serve certain types of vehicles through a higher clearance of the fueling canopy is not unique or beyond ordinary for the land involved, and would be of equal concern for any proposed fuel sales use in and out of Georgetown. Additionally, there were not sufficient findings to demonstrate that a canopy meeting the letter of the code couldn’t accommodate the applicant’s referenced 14’ vehicles. The UDC allows for a maximum height of 17’, and there was not sufficient information to demonstrate a canopy couldn’t be constructed that has a base height above 14’ and a max height at 17 feet. Additionally, the condition with which higher clearance is needed would be ordinary for any fuel sales use, and not just for this specific use at this specific property. 2. No Substantial Detriment That the granting of the Zoning Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or injurious to other property in the area or to the City in administering this Code. Complies Granting the variance will not be detrimental to the public health or safety as it will still be required to follow all safety codes such as the adopted 2015 International Building and Fire Codes. This property’s location along a highway and a major arterial roadway and the existing uses and zoning of nearby property mean that granting the variance will not be detrimental to the welfare of nearby properties and the area. Increasing the height of the canopy by 3’ will not affect the welfare of the highway, and the surrounding uses such as a nearby self-storage use and surrounding C-3 zoning will not be negatively impacted by a larger scale built form for the fuel sales use in the way that a scenic corridor or residential area would. 3. Other Property That the conditions that create the need for the Zoning Variance do not generally apply to other property in the vicinity. Does Not Comply There is not any evidence of unique conditions on the property. The height limits of the UDC measure height per UDC Section 7.02.030.D. as the “vertical distance between the lowest finished grade at the edge of the building or the base flood elevation, where applicable, and the highest point of the coping of a flat roof.” The issue of there not being enough clearance for a vehicle of a certain height would generally apply to any other property developing with fuel sales as each finished form would still place the finished grade where the vehicle would park 17’ below the top of the canopy. Page 51 of 118 Planning Department Staff Report 2022-4-VAR QuikTrip 4184 Fuel Sales Northern Canopy Page 5 of 6 ZONING MAP VARIANCE APPROVAL CRITERIA 4. Applicant's Actions That the conditions that create the need for the Zoning Variance are not the result of the applicant's own actions. Does Not Comply The conditions for which the application is requesting the Zoning Variance are the result of the Applicant’s own actions, as there is not an existing site constraint that prevents the construction of a compliant fuel canopy. Instead the applicant is seeking the variance to potentially serve a specific type of customer. 5. Comprehensive Plan That the granting of the Zoning Variance would not substantially conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and the purposes of this Code. Complies The Comprehensive Plan designates the area surrounding the subject property as a Community Center and a Highway Corridor. The Overall Transportation Plan identifies Shell Road and State Highway 195 as arterial roadways. Because of the highly commercial and highway-oriented nature prescribed to this area by the Comprehensive Plan, increasing the height of the fuel canopies by 3 feet will not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan or the purposes of the UDC. The C-3 zoning district allows for buildings up to 60 feet in height and signs along highways may be up to 28 feet in height. A 20-foot-tall fuel canopy will still generally be in line with the built form both allowed by the UDC and generally recommended by the Comprehensive Plan for Highway Corridors, Community Centers and along arterial roads. 6. Utilization That because of the conditions that create the need for the Zoning Variance, the application of this Code to the particular piece of property would effectively prohibit or unreasonably restrict the utilization of the property. Does Not Comply There is not sufficient information to demonstrate that the conditions that create the need for the Zoning Variance would unreasonably restrict the utilization of the property. While the applicant’s stated reason that Class A Motorhomes up to 14’ in height could collide with a canopy that is 13’ 6” at the base of the cover, there is not sufficient information to demonstrate that a canopy with a base above 14’ in height and maximum height of 17’ can’t be constructed. Additionally, if Class A motorhomes were unable to access the pumps under the canopy, there is not sufficient information to demonstrate that the pumps couldn’t be modified so that a higher clearance vehicle could utilize it. Additionally, there was not sufficient information provided to demonstrate that the business cannot reasonably conduct fuel sales to vehicles under 13’ 6”, nor was there sufficient information provided to demonstrate that the retail convenience stores operation will be unreasonably inhibited by the fuel canopy height restriction. Page 52 of 118 Planning Department Staff Report 2022-4-VAR QuikTrip 4184 Fuel Sales Northern Canopy Page 6 of 6 ZONING MAP VARIANCE APPROVAL CRITERIA 7. Insufficient Findings The following types of possible findings do not constitute sufficient grounds for granting a Zoning Variance: a. That the property cannot be used for its highest and best use. b. That there is a financial or economic hardship. c. That there is a self-created hardship by the property owner or their agent. d. That the development objectives of the property owner are or will be frustrated. Does Not Comply There were not any findings that constituted granting a zoning variance. The applicant’s reasoning that granting the variance could allow for 14’ tall vehicles could be categorized as a financial hardship or that the property cannot be used for its highest and best use. That reasoning only demonstrates that a potential type of customer may not be able to effectively use the business and does not effectively demonstrate that the use cannot be reasonably operated. It also appears to be a self-created hardship since the applicant is seeking the variance to allow for 14’ tall vehicles, nor were there sufficient findings to demonstrate that a canopy couldn’t be constructed to allow for 14’ tall vehicles while still meeting the overall height limit of 17’. There were also not sufficient findings that a fuel pump could not be constructed on site without a canopy for high clearance vehicles while still providing a canopy for the majority of the fuel pumps on site. The requested Zoning Variance does not comply with 5 of the 7 approval criteria and complies with 2 of the 7. There is not an extraordinary or unique condition present on the property, and staff found that there was insufficient evidence to demonstrate that the fuel canopy height limit unreasonably restricts the use of the property. While the requested variance will not have a negative impact on the surrounding area and will not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan, there were not sufficient findings to constitute granting a Zoning Variance. Public Notification As required by the Unified Development Code, all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the subject property were notified of the Zoning Variance request (9 notices), a legal notice advertising the public hearing was placed in the Sun Newspaper (Sunday June 5, 2022) and signs were posted on-site. To date, staff has received 0 written comments in favor, and 0 in opposition to the request. Attachments Exhibit 1 – Location Map Exhibit 2 – Conceptual Plan Exhibit 3 – Letter of Intent Page 53 of 118 Location 2022-4-VAR Exhibit #1 SCENICOAKSDR LITTLEWALNUTRD SH ELL RD CR 14 3 MESQ U I T E V A L L E Y R D LITT L E W A L N U T R D SH 1 9 5 SH 1 9 5 S H 195TN SH195 TN S H E L L S T O N E TRL 0 500250 Feet ¯ Site Parcels City Limits Georgetown ETJ Page 54 of 118 Vicinity MapVicinity Map CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TX N COVER SHEET A SHEET TITLE: SHEET NUMBER: DIVISION: DESIGNED BY: 1 © COPYRIGHT QUIKTRIP CORPORATION 2011ANY UNAUTHORIZED USE, REPRODUCTION,PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR SALE INWHOLE OR IN PART, IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. OR I G I N A L I S S U E D A T E : PROTOTYPE: VERSION: PROJECT NO.: DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY: RE V D A T E D E S C R I P T I O N B C D E F G H J K L M N P Q A B C D E F G H J K L M N P Q 2 3456789101112 13 14 15 1 2 3456789101112 13 14 15 41 8 3 S. H . 1 9 5 & S H E L L R D . GE O R G E T O W N , T X 4183.01 P-106 (05/01/21) 82 001 C. WOOD CWR JJV A SHEET TITLE: SHEET NUMBER: DIVISION: DESIGNED BY: 1 © COPYRIGHT QUIKTRIP CORPORATION 2011ANY UNAUTHORIZED USE, REPRODUCTION,PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR SALE INWHOLE OR IN PART, IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. OR I G I N A L I S S U E D A T E : PROTOTYPE: VERSION: PROJECT NO.: DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY: RE V D A T E D E S C R I P T I O N B C D E F G H J K L M N P Q A B C D E F G H J K L M N P Q 2 3456789101112 13 14 15 1 2 3456789101112 13 14 15 FOR REVIEW. THIS DOCUMENT IS RELEASED FOR THE PURPOSE OF REVIEW UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF JOSHUA J VALENTA, P.E. #114592 ON 6/21/2021. IT IS NOT TO BE USED FOR BIDDING, PERMIT, OR CONSTRUCTION, SH 1 9 5 SHELL R D IH 3 5 FM 2 3 4 SUN CIT Y BLVD 01 OF 73 SHEET INDEX SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE C001 COVER SHEET C002 PLAT SHEET 1 C003 PLAT SHEET 2 C020 TREE AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SHEET 1 C021 TREE AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SHEET 2 C022 TREE AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SHEET 3 C030 DEMOLITION PLAN C100 SITE DIMENSIONAL CONTROL PLAN C102 FIRE PROTECTION PLAN C103 SHELL ROAD WIDENING PLAN A100 ARCHITECTURAL FLOOR PLAN A201 ARCHITECTURAL EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SHEET 1 A202 ARCHITECTURAL EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SHEET 2 A701 ARCHITECTURAL TRASH ENCLOSURE PLAN N201 GAS CANOPY COORDINATION ELEVATIONS SHEET 1 N202 GAS CANOPY COORDINATION ELEVATIONS SHEET 2 C160 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN L100 LANDSCAPE PLAN C101 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN C150 UTILITY PLAN C151 OVERALL UTILITY PLAN C152 CITY OF GEORGETOWN UTILITY DETAILS SHEET 1 C153 CITY OF GEORGETOWN UTILITY DETAILS SHEET 2 C154 CITY OF GEORGETOWN UTILITY DETAILS SHEET 3 C155 UTILITY VERIFICATION PLAN C156 SANITARY SEWER PROFILE SHEET 1 C157 SANITARY SEWER PROFILE SHEET 2 C110 GRADING PLAN C111 DETAILED GRADING SHEET 1 C112 BUILDING DETAILED GRADING C113 STORE CANOPY GRADING PLAN C114 TC CANOPY GRADING PLAN C115 ADA COMPLIANCE REFERENCE PLAN C120 STORM PLAN C121 PRE-DEVELOPMENT WATERSHED MAP C122 POST-DEVELOPMENT WATERSHED MAP C123 TIME OF CONCENTRATION CALCULTIONS C124 MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN C125 DETENTION & WATER QUALITY POND PLAN C126 POND CALCULATIONS C127 TxDOT PRE-DEVELOPEMENT WATERSHED MAP C128 TxDOT POST-DEVELOPMENT WATERSHED MAP C200 CIP WALL PLANS SHEET 1 C201 CIP WALL PLANS SHEET 2 C202 CIP WALL PLANS SHEET 3 C203 CIP WALL 2 PLANS SHEET 1 C204 CIP WALL 2 PLANS SHEET 2 C205 CIP WALL 2 PLANS SHEET 3 C206 CIP WALL 2 PLANS SHEET 4 C300 STORM SEWER PROFILES SHEET 1 C301 STORM SEWER PROFILES SHEET 2 C302 STORM SEWER PROFILES SHEET 3 C500 MISC SITE DETAILS SHEET 1 C501 MISC SITE DETAILS SHEET 2 C510 ADA DETAILS SHEET 1 C511 ADA DETAILS SHEET 2 C520 PAVING DETAILS SHEET 1 C521 PAVING DETAILS SHEET 2 C522 PAVING DETAILS SHEET 3 C523 PAVING DETAILS SHEET 4 C524 TC PAVING DETAILS C525 CITY OF GEORGETOWN PAVING DETAILS SHEET 1 C526 CITY OF GEORGETOWN PAVING DETAILS SHEET 2 C530 TRENCHING DETAILS SHEET 1 C531 TRENCHING DETAILS SHEET 2 C540 DRAINAGE DETAILS SHEET 1 C541 DRAINAGE DETAILS SHEET 2 C550 TCEQ EROSION CONTROL DETAILS C560 TxDOT DETAILS SHEET 1 C561 TxDOT DETAILS SHEET 2 C562 TxDOT DETAILS SHEET 3 C563 TxDOT DETAILS SHEET 4 L500 LANDSCAPE DETAILS SHEET 1 L501 LANDSCAPE DETAILS SHEET 2 Page 55 of 118 S5 2 ° 1 2 ' 1 0 " W 2 0 5 . 7 0 ' S51° 30' 45"E 304.65' S58° 59' 58"E 172.89' S5 6 ° 1 4 ' 1 6 " W 2 0 0 . 1 0 ' S3 8 ° 2 8 ' 0 5 " W 3 6 1 . 0 5 ' BLOCK 1, LOT 1 BLOCK 1, LOT 2 N84° 1 7 ' 3 3 " E 1 0 7 . 4 7 ' S51° 31' 55.18"E 1061.23' N3 4 ° 1 6 ' 0 3 " E 13 0 . 5 9 ' L= 1 2 4 . 0 5 , R = 2 7 8 5 . 2 9 CB = S 3 5 ° 3 2 ' 3 6 . 3 4 " W CD = 1 2 4 . 0 4 0 S55°03'07"E 635.07' N 50 25 0 50 100 PAGE 1 OF 2 SHELL ROAD & S.H. 195 SUBDIVISION FINAL PLAT BLOCK 1, LOTS 1 & 2 9500 AMBERGLEN BLVD. BUILDING F, SUITE 125 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78729 TEL (512) 777-4600 FAX (512) 252-8141 TBPELS ENGINEERING FIRM #312 2020-___-___ NICHOLAS P. LESCHKE, PE 130255 DATE OCTOBER 12, 2020 ENGINEER: NICHOLAS P. LESCHKE P.E HALFF ASSOCIATES, INC. TBPE FIRM #F-312 9500 AMBERGLEN BLVD. BUILDING F SUITE 125 AUSTIN, TX 78729 NLESCHKE@HALFF.COM (512) 777-4600 SURVEYOR: SCOTT F. AMMONS, RPLS REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR TEXAS REGISTRATION NO. 6550 MATKIN-HOOVER ENGINEERING & SURVEYING FIRM NO.s #F-10024000 #F-10194347 8 SPENCER ROAD STE 300, BOERNE, TX 78006 SAMMONS@MATKINHOOVER.COM (830) 249-0600 FEMA: AREA OF MINIMAL FLOOD HAZARD ZONE X FEMA FLOOD ZONE MAP PANEL 48491C0285F EFF. 12/20/2019 OWNERS: MARION SHIPMAN AND RICKY SHIPMAN APPLICANTS/AGENTS NAME: DAVID MEYER, JR. ACREAGE OF TOTAL SITE: 7.970 ACRES TOTAL NUMBER OF BLOCKS: 1 BLOCK TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS: 2 LOTS A 7.970 ACRE TRACT OF LAND, OUT OF THE W. ROBERTS SURVEY, ABSTRACT 524, IN THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING A REPLAT OF THE REMAINDER OF LOTS 1, 2 AND 3 OF RIVER ROAD SUBDIVISION, RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. 2001078995, OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, AND A SUBDIVISION OF 5.00 ACRES OUT OF THE W. ROBERTS SURVEY, ABSTRACT 524. SURVEY LEGEND Page 56 of 118 PAGE 2 OF 2 2020-___-___ METES AND BOUNDS A 7.970 ACRE TRACT OF LAND, OUT OF THE W. ROBERTS SURVEY NO. 4, ABSTRACT 524, IN THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS BEING PART OF THE REMAINDER OF LOTS 1, 2 AND 3 OF RIVER ROAD SUBDIVISION, RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. 201078995 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS AND ALL OF THE REMAINING PORTION OF A 5.00 ACRE TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2003101243 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS. SAID 7.970 ACRE TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A FOUND TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (TXDOT) RIGHT-OF-WAY (R.O.W.) MONUMENT, TYPE II, IN THE SOUTHWEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY 195, A VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY, AS SHOWN ON THE TXDOT R.O.W. MAP CSJ NO. 0440-01-036 & 0440-02-012, THE SOUTHEAST R.O.W. LINE OF SHELL ROAD AS SHOWN ON SAID TXDOT R.O.W. MAP FOR THE WEST END OF A CUTBACK, THE MOST WESTERLY NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE REMAINDER OF SAID LOT 1 AND OF THE TRACT DESCRIBED HEREIN; THENCE: N 84° 17' 33" E, WITH THE SAID CUTBACK, THE NORTHWEST LINE OF THE REMAINDER OF SAID LOT 1, THE TRACT DESCRIBED HEREIN AND THE SOUTHWEST R.O.W. LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY 195 AS SHOWN ON SAID TXDOT R.O.W. MAP, A DISTANCE OF 123.69 FEET, TO A SET 12" IRON ROD WITH A RED PLASTIC CAP STAMPED "MATKIN-HOOVER ENG. & SURVEYING" FOR THE EAST END OF SAID CUTBACK, THE MOST EASTERLY NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE REMAINDER OF SAID LOT 1 AND THE TRACT DESCRIBED HEREIN; THENCE: S 55° 03' 07" E, WITH THE NORTHEAST LINE OF THE REMAINDER OF SAID LOTS 1, 2 AND 3, THE TRACT DESCRIBED HEREIN AND SAID SOUTHWEST R.O.W. LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY 195, AT 180.19 FEET, A FOUND 12" IRON ROD WITH A CAP, FOR THE COMMON CORNER OF THE REMAINDER OF SAID LOTS 1 AND 2, AT 476.70 FEET, A FOUND 58" IRON ROD FOR THE COMMON CORNER OF THE REMAINDER OF SAID LOTS 2 AND 3, AND CONTINUINGFOR A TOTAL DISTANCE OF 635.07 FEET, TO A FOUND TXDOT R.O.W. MONUMENT, TYPE II, IN THE NORTHEAST LINE OF THE REMAINDER OF SAID LOT 3 AND SAID SOUTHWEST R.O.W. LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY 195; THENCE: S 58° 59' 58" E, WITH THE NORTHEAST LINE OF THE REMAINDER OF SAID LOT 3, THE TRACT DESCRIBED HEREIN AND SAID SOUTHWEST R.O.W. LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY 195, A DISTANCE OF 172.89 FEET, TO A SET 12" IRONROD WITH A RED PLASTIC CAP STAMPED "MATKIN-HOOVER ENG. & SURVEYING" FOR THE COMMON CORNER OF THE REMAINDER OF SAID LOTS 3 AND 4; THENCE: S 52° 12' 10" W, DEPARTING THE NORTHEAST LINE OF THE REMAINDER OF SAID LOTS 3 AND 4 AND SAID SOUTHWEST R.O.W. LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY 195, WITH THE COMMON LINE BETWEEN SAID LOTS 3 AND 4, A DISTANCE OF 205.70 FEET, TO A FOUND 12" IRON ROD, IN THE NORTH LINE OF SAID 5.00 ACRE TRACT OF LAND AND FOR THE COMMON CORNER OF SAID LOTS 3 AND 4; THENCE: S 51° 30' 45" E, WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID 5.00 ACRE TRACT AND THE SOUTH LINE OF THE REMAINDER OF SAID LOT 4, A DISTANCE OF 304.65 FEET, TO A SET 12" IRON ROD WITH A RED PLASTIC CAP STAMPED "MATKIN-HOOVER ENG. & SURVEYING" IN THE WEST LINE OF A CALLED 5.00 ACRE TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2015110506, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, FOR THE SOUTH CORNER OF SAID LOT 4 AND THE EAST CORNER OF THE TRACT DESCRIBED HEREIN; THENCE: S 56° 14' 16" W, WITH THE COMMON LINE BETWEEN SAID 5.00 ACRE TRACTS DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2003101243 AND DOCUMENT NO. 2015110506, A DISTANCE OF 200.10 FEET, TO A FOUND 38" IRON ROD, IN THESOUTH LINE OF SAID 5.00 ACRE TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2009048703 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, FOR THE COMMON CORNER OF SAID 5.00 ACRE TRACTS AND THE TRACT DESCRIBED HEREIN; THENCE: N 51° 31' 55" W, WITH THE COMMON LINE OF SAID 5.00 ACRE TRACTS, A DISTANCE OF 1070.84 FEET, TO A FOUND 12" IRON ROD, IN SAID SOUTHEAST R.O.W. LINE OF SHELL ROAD AND THE NORTHWEST LINE OF THE TRACT DESCRIBED HEREIN, FOR THE COMMON CORNER OF SAID 5.00 ACRE TRACTS AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE TRACT DESCRIBED HEREIN; THENCE: N 34° 14' 58" E WITH SAID SOUTHEAST R.O.W. LINE OF SHELL ROAD, THE NORTHWEST LINE OF SAID 5.00 ACRE TRACTS, OF SAID LOT 1 AND THE TRACT DESCRIBED HEREIN, AT 191.42 FEET, A FOUND 12" IRON ROD WITH CAP, FOR THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID 5.00 ACRE TRACT AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE REMAINDER OF SAID LOT 1, A TOTAL DISTANCE OF 243.48 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING 7.970 ACRES OF LAND SITUATED IN THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS. BENCHMARK TABLE BM #100 SET MAG NAIL WITH WASHER IN A CONCRETE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE ON NORTHWEST SIDE OFSHELL ROAD AS SHOWN HEREON ELEV: 773.27' BM #200 SET COTTON SPINDLE IN ASPHALT ON SOUTHWEST SIDE OF EASTBOUND HWY 195FRONTAGE ROAD AS SHOWN HEREON ELEV: 771.81' NOTES 1. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF RECENT STREET CONSTRUCTION OR REPAIR AT TIME OF THIS SURVEY. 2. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF WETLANDS ACCORDING TO: HTTP://WWW.FWS.GOV/WETLANDS/DATA/MAPPER.HTML. THE WERE NO WETLAND AREAS DELINEATED OR FIELD MARKED BY THE APPROPRIATE AUTHORITIES AT THE TIME OF THIS SURVEY. 3. THE CLOSEST FIRE HYDRANT IS LOCATED ALONG THE SOUTHWEST ROW LINE OF HIGHWAY 195, APPROXIMATELY 1345' FROM THE EAST CORNER OF THE SUBJECT TRACT. 4. UTILITY CONTACT INFORMATION: ELECTRIC SERVICES PEDERNALES ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE INC. PHONE: 888-554-4732 GAS SERVICES ATMOS ENERGY PHONE: 888-286-6700 CABLE AND TELEPHONE SERVICES FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS PHONE: (800) 921-8101 FIBER LIGHT LLC PHONE: 844-509-0775 QUANTA TELECOM SERVICES PHONE: 713-629-7600 WATER SERVICES CITY OF GEORGETOWN PHONE: (512) 930-3640 SEWER SERVICES (WASTEWATER) NONE - CITY OF GEORGETOWN IS NEARBY PHONE: (512) 930-3640 5. THE NEAREST ACCESS POINTS TO THE SOUTHWEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF HIGHWAY 195 AND THE SOUTHWEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF WEST SHELL ROAD ARE AS FOLLOWS: 5a. AN ASPHALT DRIVEWAY INTERSECTS THE SOUTHEAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SHELL ROAD APPROXIMATELY 295' IN A SOUTHWESTERLY DIRECTION, FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SUBJECT TRACT. 5b. AN ASPHALT DRIVEWAY INTERSECTS THE SOUTHWEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF HWY 195 AT THE EAST CORNER OF THE SUBJECT TRACT AND ALSO APPROXIMATELY 370' SOUTHEAST OF THE EAST CORNER OF THE SUBJECT TRACT. 6. SURVEYOR IS UNAWARE OF ALL PROPOSED CHANGES TO STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES. 7. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF RECENT BUILDING CONSTRUCTION OR DEMOLITION WORK AT THE TIME OF THIS 9500 AMBERGLEN BLVD. BUILDING F, SUITE 125 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78729 TEL (512) 777-4600 FAX (512) 252-8141 TBPELS ENGINEERING FIRM #312 A 7.970 ACRE TRACT OF LAND, OUT OF THE W. ROBERTS SURVEY, ABSTRACT 524, IN THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING A REPLAT OF THE REMAINDER OF LOTS 1, 2 AND 3 OF RIVER ROAD SUBDIVISION, RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. 2001078995, OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, AND A SUBDIVISION OF 5.00 ACRES OUT OF THE W. ROBERTS SURVEY, ABSTRACT 524. STATE OF TEXAS § § KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON § I, MARION SHIPMAN AND RICKY SHIPMAN, CO-OWNERS OF THE CERTAIN 7.970 ACRE TRACT OF LAND SHOWN HEREON AND DESCRIBED IN A DEED RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2001078995 AND DOCUMENT NO. 2003101243 OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, [AND DO HEREBY STATE THAT THERE ARE NO LIEN HOLDERS OF THE CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND], AND DO HEREBY SUBDIVIDE SAID TRACT AS SHOWN HEREON, AND DO HEREBY CONSENT TO ALL PLAT NOT REQUIREMENTS SHOWN HEREON, AND DO HEREBY DEDICATE TO WILLIAMSON COUNTY THE STREETS, ALLEYS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY, EASEMENTS AND PUBLIC PLACES SHOWN HEREON FOR SUCH PUBLIC PURPOSES AS THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN MAY DEEM APPROPRIATE. THIS SUBDIVISION IS TO BE KNOWN AS QUIKTRIP 4183. TO CERTIFY WHICH, WITNESS BY MY HAND THIS _____ DAY OF ___________________, 20____. __________________________________ ___________________________________ MARION SHIPMAN RICKY SHIPMAN P.O. BOX 1119 P.O. BOX 1711 CEDAR PARK, TX 78630-1119 LEANDER, TX 78464-1711 STATE OF TEXAS § § KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON § BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED, A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID COUNTY AND STATE, ON THIS DAY PERSONALLY APPEARED MICHAEL WRIGHT, MANAGER, SHELL-HWY 195, LLC, KNOWN TO ME TO BE THE PERSON WHOSE NAME IS SUBSCRIBED TO THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE THIS ____ DAY OF __________________, 20____. NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS MY COMMISSION EXPIRES ON: PLANNING DIRECTOR I, SOFIA NELSON, PLANNING DIRECTOR OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THIS PLAT IS APPROVED FOR FILING OF RECORD WITH THE COUNTY CLERK OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS. __________________________________ _______________ SOFIA NELSON, PLANNING DIRECTOR DATE PLANNING AND ZONING THIS SUBDIVISION TO BE KNOWN AS SHELL ROAD & S.H. 195 SUBDIVISION HAS BEEN ACCEPTED AND APPROVED FOR FILING OF RECORD WITH THE COUNTY CLERK OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE GEORGETOWN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ON THE ____ DAY OF _________, 20____. __________________________________ _______________ ERCEL BRASHEAR, CHAIRMAN DATE __________________________________ _______________ BEN STEWART, SECRETARY DATE CITY FLOODPLAIN COORDINATOR BASED UPON THE ABOVE REPRESENTATIONS OF THE ENGINEER OR SURVEYOR WHOSE SEAL IS AFFIXED HERETO, AND AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PLAT AS REPRESENTED BY THE SAID ENGINEER OR SURVEYOR, I FIND THAT THIS PLAT COMPLIES WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 15.44, FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION, OF THE GEORGETOWN MUNICIPAL CODE. THIS CERTIFICATION IS MADE SOLELY UPON SUCH REPRESENTATIONS AND SHOULD NOT BE RELIED UPON FOR VERIFICATIONS OF THE FACTS ALLEGED. THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN DISCLAIMS ANY RESPONSIBILITY TO ANT MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC OR INDEPENDENT VERIFICATIONS OF THE REPRESENTATION, FACTUAL OR OTHERWISE, CONTAINED IN THIS PLAT AND THE DOCUMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH IT. __________________________________ _______________ WESLEY WRIGHT, P.E., CFM, FLOODPLAIN COORDINATOR DATE CITY OF GEORGETOWN WILLIAMSON COUNTY FLOOD PLAIN ADMINISTRATOR BASED UPON THE REPRESENTATIONS OF THE ENGINEER OR SURVEYOR WHOSE SEAL IS AFFIXED HERETO, AND AFTER REVIEW OF THE PLAT AS REPRESENTED BY THE SAID ENGINEER OR SURVEYOR, I FIND THAT THIS PLAT COMPLIES WITH THE WILLIAMSON COUNTY FLOODPLAIN REGULATIONS. THIS CERTIFICATION IS MADE SOLELY UPON SUCH REPRESENTATIONS AND SHOULD NOT BE RELIED UPON FOR VERIFICATIONS OF THE FACTS ALLEGED. WILLIAMSON COUNTY DISCLAIMS ANY RESPONSIBILITY TO ANY MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC FOR INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF THE REPRESENTATIONS, FACTUAL OR OTHERWISE, CONTAINED IN THIS PLAT AND THE DOCUMENTS ASSOCIATED WITHIN IT. __________________________________ _______________ J. TERRON EVERTSON, P.E., D.R., C.F.M. DATE WILLIAMSON COUNTY FLOODPLAIN ADMINISTRATOR STATE OF TEXAS § § KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS; COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON § I, NANCY E. RISTER, CLERK OF THE COUNTY COURT OF SAID COUNTY, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT IN WRITING, WITH ITS CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION WAS FILED FOR RECORD IN MY OFFICE ON THE ____ DAY OF _______, 20___ A.D., AT ____O'CLOCK, ___.M., AND DULY RECORDED THIS THE DAY OF ________, 20___ A.D., AT ____ O'CLOCK, ____.M., IN THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY IN INSTRUMENT NO. ________. TO CERTIFY WHICH, WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL AT THE COUNTY COURT OF SAID COUNTY, AT MY OFFICE IN GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, THE DATE LAST SHOWN ABOVE WRITTEN. ___________________________________ NANCY E. RISTER, CLERK COUNTY COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS BY: ___________________,DEPUTY GENERAL NOTES: 1. UTILITY PROVIDERS FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT ARE: 1.1. WATER: CITY OF GEORGETOWN PHONE: 512-930-3640 1.2. WASTEWATER/SEPTIC: NONE. CITY OF GEORGETOWN IS NEARBY PHONE: 512-930-3640 1.3. ELECTRIC: PEDERNALES ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE INC. PHONE: 888-554-4732 2. ALL STRUCTURES/ OBSTRUCTIONS ARE PROHIBITED IN DRAINAGE EASEMENTS. 3. THERE ARE NO AREA WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THIS SUBDIVISION IN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN AS DEFINED BY FIRM MAP NUMBER 48491C0285E EFFECTIVE DATE OF SEPTEMBER 26TH 2008. 4. IN ORDER TO PROMOTE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM A STRUCTURE, THE SLAB ELEVATIONS SHOULD BE BUILT AT LEAST ONE-FOOT ABOVE THE SURROUNDING GROUND, AND THE GROUND SHOULD BE GRADED AWAY FROM THE STRUCTURE AT A SLOPE OF 12" PER FOOT FOR A DISTANCE OF AT LEAST 10 FEET. 5. ALL SEDIMENTATION, FILTRATION, DETENTION, AND/OR RETENTION BASINS AND RELATED APPURTENANCES SHOWN SHALL BE SITUATED WITHIN A DRAINAGE EASEMENT OR DRAINAGE LOT. THE OWNERS, HOA, OR ASSIGNEES OF THE TRACTS UPON WHICH ARE LOCATED SUCH EASEMENTS, APPURTENANCES, AND DETENTION FACILITIES SHALL MAINTAIN SAME AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR MAINTENANCE, ROUTINE INSPECTION AND UPKEEP. 6. ANY HERITAGE TREE AS NOTED ON THIS PLAT IS SUBJECT, IN PERPETUITY, TO THE MAINTENANCE, CARE, PRUNING AND REMOVAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN. APPROVED REMOVAL DOES NOT REQUIRE MODIFICATION OF THE PLAT. 7. ALL INDIVIDUAL LOTS CONTAINING HERITAGE TREES ARE CONFIGURED AND DESIGNED SO THAT THE LOT IS DEVELOPABLE FOR THE INTENDED PURPOSE WITHOUT REQUIRING REMOVAL OF THE HERITAGE TREES OR EXCEEDING THE PERCENTAGE OF ALLOWABLE DISTURBANCE WITHIN THE HERITAGE TREES CRZ. 8. IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE PLAT NOTES - NON-RESIDENTIAL LOTS: 8.1. THE MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE PER NON-RESIDENTIAL LOT SHALL BE PURSUANT TO THE UDC AT THE TIME OF THE SITE PLAN APPLICATION BASED ON THE ZONING DESIGNATION OF THE PROPERTY. 9. THE LANDOWNER ASSUMES ALL RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, OR ROAD WIDENING EASEMENTS. BY PLACING ANYTHING IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OR ROAD WIDENING EASEMENTS, THE LANDOWNER INDEMNIFIES AND HOLDS THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, WILLIAMSON COUNTY, THEIR OFFICERS, AGENTS AND EMPLOYEES HARMLESS FROM ANY LIABILITY OWING TO PROPERTY DEFECTS OR NEGLIGENCE NOT ATTRIBUTABLE TO THEM AND ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS MAY BE REMOVED BY THE CITY AND/OR COUNTY AND THAT THE OWNER OF THE IMPROVEMENTS WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE RELOCATION AND/OR REPLACEMENT OF THE IMPROVEMENTS. 10. THE BUILDING OF ALL STREETS, ROADS, AND OTHER PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES AND ANY BRIDGES OR CULVERTS NECESSARY TO BE CONSTRUCTED OR PLACED IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNERS OF THE TRACT OF LAND COVERED BY THIS PLAT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS PRESCRIBED BY THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN AND/OR WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS. NEITHER THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN NOR WILLIAMSON COUNTY ASSUMES ANY OBLIGATION TO BUILD ANY OF THE STREETS, ROADS, OR OTHER PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES SHOWN ON THIS PLAT OR OF CONSTRUCTING ANY OF THE BRIDGES OR DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. NEITHER THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN NOR WILLIAMSON COUNTY ASSUMES ANT RESPONSIBILITY FOR DRAINAGE WAYS OR EASEMENTS IN THE SUBDIVISION OTHER THAN THOSE DRAINING OR PROTECTING THE ROAD SYSTEM AND STREETS IN THEIR RESPECTIVE JURISDICTIONS. 11. NEITHER THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN NOR WILLIAMSON COUNTY ASSUMES ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OF REPRESENTATIONS BY OTHER PARTIES IN THESE PLAT. FLOODPLAIN DATA, IN PARTICULAR, MAY CHANGE DEPENDING ON SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENT. IT IS FURTHER UNDERSTOOD THAT THE OWNERS OF THE TRACT OF LAND COVERED BY THIS PLAT MUST INSTALL ALL THEIR OWN EXPENSE ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AND SIGNAGE THAT MAY BE REQUIRED BEFORE THE STREETS IN THE SUBDIVISION HAVE FINALLY BEEN ACCEPTED FOR MAINTENANCE BY THE CITY AND / OR COUNTY. 12. RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENTS FOR WIDENING ROADWAYS OR IMPROVING DRAINAGE SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE LANDOWNER UNTIL ROAD OR DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ARE ACTUALLY CONSTRUCTED ON THE PROERTY. THE CITY AND/OR COUNTY HAVE THE RIGHT AT ANY TIME TO TAKE POSSESSION OF ANY ROAD WIDENING EASEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION, IMPROVEMENT, OR MAINTENANCE OF THE ADJACENT ROAD. 13. THIS PLAT IS SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN WATER CONSERVATION ORDINANCE. 14. THE SUBDIVISION SUBJECT TO THIS APPLICATION IS SUBJECT TO THE WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN. 15. A GEOLOGIC ASSESSMENT, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS, WAS COMPLETED ON SEPTEMBER 13, 2019. ANY SPRINGS AND STREAMS AS IDENTIFIED IN THE GEOLOGIC ASSESSMENT ARE SHOWN HEREIN. I, NICHOLAS P. LESCHKE, LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER IN THE STATE OF TEXAS, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SUBDIVISION IS IN THE EDWARDS AQUIFER RECHARGE ZONE AND IS NOT ENCROACHED BY A ZONE A FLOOD AREA, AS DENOTED HEREIN, AND IS DEFINED BY FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION FLOOD HAZARD BOUNDARY MAP, COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER 48491C0285E, EFFECTIVE DATE SEPTEMBER 26, 2008, AND THAT EACH LOT CONFORMS TO THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN REGULATIONS. THE FULLY DEVELOPED, CONCENTRATED STORMWATER RUNOFF RESULTING FROM THE ONE HUNDRED (100) YEAR FREQUENCY STORM IS CONTAINED WITHIN THE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS SHOWN AND/OR PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY DEDICATED BY THIS PLAT. TO CERTIFY WHICH, WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL AT GEORGETOWN, WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, THIS ___ DAY OF _____, 20__. ___________________________________ NICHOLAS P. LESCHKE REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER NO. 130255 STATE OF TEXAS STATE OF TEXAS § § KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS; COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON § I, SCOTT F. AMMONS, REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF TEXAS, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT IS TRUE AND CORRECTLY MADE FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE ON THE GROUND OF THE PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED HEREON, AND THAT THERE ARE NO APPARENT DISCREPANCIES, CONFLICTS, OVERLAPPING OF IMPROVEMENTS, VISIBLE UTILITY LINES OR ROADS IN PLACE, EXCEPT AS SHOWN ON THE ACCOMPANYING PLAT, AND THAT THE CORNER MONUMENTS SHOWN THEREON WERE PROPERLY PLACED UNDER MY SUPERVISION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS. TO CERTIFY WHICH, WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL AT GEORGETOWN, WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, THIS ____ DAY OF _____, 20__. ___________________________________ SCOTT F. AMMONS REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR NO. 6550 STATE OF TEXAS WILLIAMSON COUNTY ON-SITE SEWAGE FACILITIES (OSSR) CERTIFICATION BASED UPON THE ABOVE REPRESENTATIONS OF THE ENGINEER OR SURVEYOR WHOSE SEAL IS AFFIXED HERETO, AND AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PLAT AS REPRESENTED BY THE SAID ENGINEER OR SURVEYOR, I FIND THAT THIS PLAT COMPLIES WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE EDWARDS AQUIFER REGULATIONS FOR WILLIAMSON COUNTY AND WILLIAMSON COUNTY ON-SITE SEWAGE FACILITY REGULATIONS. THIS CERTIFICATION IS MADE SOLELY UPON SUCH REPRESENTATIONS AND SHOULD NOT BE RELIED UPON FOR VERIFICATIONS OF THE FACTS ALLEGED. THE WILLIAMSON COUNT ENGINEER'S OFFICE AND WILLIAMSON COUNTY DISCLAIMS ANY RESPONSIBILITY TO ANY MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC FOR INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF THE REPRESENTATIONS, FACTUAL OR OTHERWISE, CONTAINED IN THIS PLAT AND THE DOCUMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH IT. ___________________________________ _______________ J. TERRON EVERTSON, P.E., D.R., C.F.M. DATE WILLIAMSON COUNTY ENGINEER SHELL ROAD & S.H. 195 SUBDIVISION FINAL PLAT BLOCK 1, LOTS 1 & 2 Page 57 of 118 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X RE V D A T E D E S C R I P T I O N 41 8 3                                                     SW C H W Y 1 9 5 & S H E L L R D GE O R G E T O W N , T E X A S 7 8 6 3 3 OR I G I N A L I S S U E D A T E :                                                                                                                                                                                                                         1 2 Q 345 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Q P P PROJECT NO.:19-5027 N N M M L L K K J J H H G G © COPYRIGHT QUIKTRIP CORPORATION 2011ANY UNAUTHORIZED USE, REPRODUCTION,PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR SALE IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. F PROTOTYPE: VERSION: DIVISION: DESIGNED BY: F 82 DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY: NT KP E E X D X X X X X X X X X X X X X XXX X XX X X XXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X D C C SHEET TITLE: B ALTA SURVEY SHEET NUMBER: B A 30 15 0 1 2 345 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 30 15 60 A X X X N &,7<2)*(25*(72:1352-(&7126'3 Page 58 of 118 X XXXX X X X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXX X X XXXXXXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 1 2 Q 345 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Q P P PROJECT NO.:19-5027 N N M M L L K K J J H H G G © C O P Y R I G H T Q U I K T R I P C O R P O R A T I O N 2 0 1 1 ANY UNAUTHORIZED USE, REPRODUCTION,PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR SALE INWHOLE OR IN PART, IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. F PROTOTYPE: VERSION: DIVISION: DESIGNED BY: F 82 DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY: NT KP E E D D C C SHEET TITLE: B ALTA SURVEY SHEET NUMBER: B A 30 15 0 1 2 345 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 30 15 60 A XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX RE V D A T E D E S C R I P T I O N 41 8 3                                                                                        SW C H W Y 1 9 5 & S H E L L R D GE O R G E T O W N , T E X A S 7 8 6 3 3 OR I G I N A L I S S U E D A T E :                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            N &,7<2)*(25*(72:1352-(&7126'3 Page 59 of 118 STATE HIGHWAY 195 VARIABLE WIDTH R.O.W. ROW CSJ. NO. 0440-01-036 & 0440-02-012 W W 31 K D I E S E L ( 1 0 ' Ø ) 18K B I O D I E S E L ( 1 0 ' Ø ) 10 K D E F ( 1 0 ' Ø ) SUB M E R G E D PUM P SUBM E R G E D PUM P 31 K D I E S E L ( 1 0 ' Ø ) ANN U L A R SUBM E R G E D PUM P FIL L FILL ANN U L A R ANN U L A R ANN U L A R SUB M E R G E D PUM P FIL L FIL L PRO B E PRO B E PRO B E PRO B E 20K U N L E A D E D ( 1 0 ' Ø ) SUBM E R G E D PUM P FILL VEN T VAP O R PRO B E ANN U L A R 20K U N L E A D E D ( 1 0 ' Ø ) SUBM E R G E D PUM P FILL VEN T VAP O R PRO B E ANN U L A R 20 K P R O D U C T X ( 1 0 ' Ø ) SUBM E R G E D PUM P FILL VEN T VAP O R PRO B E ANN U L A R 20 K P R E M I U M ( 1 0 ' Ø ) SUBM E R G E D PUM P FILL VEN T VAP O R PRO B E ANN U L A R C.O. C.O. C.O. C.O. C.O. C.O. C.O. S87° 5 2 ' 5 9 " W 2 0 2 5 . 2 0 ' TO P A T E N T T R A C T C O R N E R (SCA L E D ) SH E L L R O A D 14 0 ' R . O . W . RO W C S J . N O . 0 4 4 0 - 0 1 - 0 3 6 & 0 4 4 0 - 0 2 - 0 1 2 30 15 0 30 60 N SITE LEGENDSITE DIMENSIONAL CONTROL NOTES ” SITE LIGHTING FIXTURE TABLE CITY OF GEORGETOWN PARKING CALCULATIONS Qu i k T r i p N o . A SHEET TITLE: SHEET NUMBER: DIVISION: DESIGNED BY: 1 © COPYRIGHT QUIKTRIP CORPORATION 2011 ANY UNAUTHORIZED USE, REPRODUCTION, PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR SALE IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. OR I G I N A L I S S U E D A T E : PROTOTYPE: VERSION: PROJECT NO.: DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY: RE V DA T E DE S C R I P T I O N B C D E F G H J K L M N P Q A B C D E F G H J K L M N P Q 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 41 8 3 S. H . 1 9 5 & S H E L L R D . GE O R G E T O W N , T X 4183.01 P-106 (05/01/21) 82 001 C. WOOD CWR JJV Qu i k T r i p N o . A SHEET TITLE: SHEET NUMBER: DIVISION: DESIGNED BY: 1 © COPYRIGHT QUIKTRIP CORPORATION 2011 ANY UNAUTHORIZED USE, REPRODUCTION, PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR SALE IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. OR I G I N A L I S S U E D A T E : PROTOTYPE: VERSION: PROJECT NO.: DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY: RE V DA T E DE S C R I P T I O N B C D E F G H J K L M N P Q A B C D E F G H J K L M N P Q 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 FOR REVIEW. THIS DOCUMENT IS RELEASED FOR THE PURPOSE OF REVIEW UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF JOSHUA J VALENTA, P.E. #114592 ON 6/21/2021. IT IS NOT TO BE USED FOR BIDDING, PERMIT, OR CONSTRUCTION, EN G I N E E R I N G & S U R V E Y I N G DRIVEWAY SPACING EXHIBIT C100 IMPERVIOUS COVER REQUIREMENTS Page 60 of 118 Page 61 of 118 Page 62 of 118 Page 63 of 118 QuikTrip 4183 Fuel Sales Northern Canopy 2022-4-VAR June 21, 2022 | Zoning Board of Adjustment Page 64 of 118 2 Item Under Consideration 2022-4-VAR •Public Hearing and possible action on a Zoning Variance from the fuel sales canopy height limit pursuant to Section 5.04.020 of the Unified Development Code, for the property located at 3930 Shell Road, bearing the legal description of 7.970 acres of land in the William Roberts Survey, Abstract Number 524 (2022- 4-VAR). Ryan Clark, Planner II Page 65 of 118 3 Page 66 of 118 4 Outdoor Self- Storage Church Page 67 of 118 5 Location of Canopy for 4-VAR Proposed Site Plan SH 195 Shell Road Page 68 of 118 6 17’ height at base, 20’ 6” at top Exhibit of proposed Fuel Sales Canopy Canopy Support Posts Page 69 of 118 7 Zoning Variance The Zoning Board of Adjustment may authorize a Zoning Variance from the requirements of the zoning provisions of this Unified Development Code if the Variance from the terms of the zoning provisions is: •Not contrary to the public interest •Due to special conditions •A literal enforcement of the requirements would result in unnecessary hardship •The spirit of this Code is preserved •Substantial justice done Page 70 of 118 8 Approval Criteria –UDC Section 3.15.030 Criteria for a Variance Complies Partially Complies Does Not Comply 1. Extraordinary Conditions X 2. No Substantial Detriment X 3. Other Property X 4. Applicant’s Actions X 5. Comprehensive Plan X 6. Utilization X 7. Insufficient Findings X Page 71 of 118 9 Approval Criteria 1. Extraordinary Conditions That there are extraordinary or special conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the provisions of this Unified Development Code will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of their land. For example, a Zoning Variance might be justified because of topographic or other special conditions unique to the property and development involved, while it would not be justified due to inconvenience or financial disadvantage. Page 72 of 118 10 Approval Criteria 2. No Substantial Detriment That the granting of the Zoning Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or injurious to other property in the area or to the City in administering this Code. 3. Other Property That the conditions that create the need for the Zoning Variance do not generally apply to other property in the vicinity. Page 73 of 118 11 Outdoor Self- Storage Church Page 74 of 118 12 Approval Criteria 4. Applicant’s Actions That the conditions that create the need for the Zoning Variance are not the result of the applicant's own actions. 5. Comprehensive Plan That the granting of the Zoning Variance would not substantially conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and the purposes of this Code. Page 75 of 118 13 Approval Criteria 5 –Comprehensive Plan, Highway Corridors •Commercial, retail, and mixed-uses to capitalize on highway visibility •Auto-oriented layouts •Lighting oriented for automobiles •Large scale monument signs Page 76 of 118 14 Approval Criteria 5 –Comprehensive Plan, Highway Corridors –Sign Dimensions per UDC Sec. 10.06 Maximum Height Page 77 of 118 15 Approval Criteria 6. Utilization That because of the conditions that create the need for the Zoning Variance, the application of this Code to the particular piece of property would effectively prohibit or unreasonably restrict the utilization of the property. Page 78 of 118 16 Approval Criteria 7. Insufficient Findings The following types of possible findings do not constitute sufficient grounds for granting a Zoning Variance: •That the property cannot be used for its highest and best use. •That there is a financial or economic hardship. •That there is a self-created hardship by the property owner or their agent. •That the development objectives of the property owner are or will be frustrated. Page 79 of 118 17 Approval Criteria –UDC Section 3.15.030 Criteria for a Variance Complies Partially Complies Does Not Comply 1. Extraordinary Conditions X 2. No Substantial Detriment X 3. Other Property X 4. Applicant’s Actions X 5. Comprehensive Plan X 6. Utilization X 7. Insufficient Findings X Page 80 of 118 18 Public Notifications •9 property owners within the 300’ buffer •Notice in Sun News on Sunday, June 5 •Signs posted on the property •To date, staff has received: •0 written comments IN FAVOR •0 written comments OPPOSED Page 81 of 118 19 Summary •Public Hearing and possible action on a Zoning Variance from the fuel sales canopy height limit pursuant to Section 5.04.020 of the Unified Development Code, for the property located at 3930 Shell Road, bearing the legal description of 7.970 acres of land in the William Roberts Survey, Abstract Number 524 (2022- 4-VAR). Ryan Clark, Planner II •Four votes (a supermajority (3/4) vote of the Board) are required to grant a Variance. A variance that does not receive four votes is considered denied. (Code of Ord. 2.29.040) •When making a motion, the Board must make a finding of the criteria. Page 82 of 118 City of Georgetown, Texas Zoning Board of Adjustment June 21, 2022 SUBJECT: Public Hearing and possible action on a Zoning Variance from the fuel sales canopy height limit pursuant to Section 5.04.020 of the Unified Development Code, for the property located at 3930 Shell Road, bearing the legal description of 7.970 acres of land in the William Roberts Survey, Abstract Number 524 (2022-5- VAR). Ryan Clark, Planner ITEM SUMMARY: Overview of Applicant’s Request: The applicant is requesting a variance to the height limit for fuel sales canopies to allow for the overall canopy height of their proposed canopy south of their structure at the corner of SH 195 at 3930 Shell Road to be 20 feet tall, a 17.6% variance to the UDC’s limit of 17 feet set in UDC 5.04.020.T.7. Staff’s Analysis: The following are the pertinent sections of the Unified Development Code (UDC) related to this request: UDC Section 5.04.020. – Commercial Use Limitations, T. Fuel Sales, 7: The bottom of the canopy shall be a minimum of 13 feet six inches in height. The maximum height of the overall canopy shall not exceed 17 feet. Staff has reviewed the variance request and the applicant’s stated findings, and has evaluated the request based on the UDC required findings for a variance in accordance with UDC Section 3.15.030, which stated: Required Findings The Zoning Board of Adjustment may authorize a variance from the requirements of the zoning provisions of the UDC if the variance from the terms of the zoning provisions is not contrary to the public interest and, due to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the requirements would result in unnecessary hardship, so the spirit of this Code is preserved, and substantial justice done. No variance shall be granted unless the ZBA finds all of the required findings established in UDC Section 3.15.030.A. Staff has reviewed the submitted Zoning Variance request in accordance with the UDC and other applicable codes. Staff has determined that the request complies with 2 and does not comply with 5 of the 7 required findings established in UDC Section 3.15.030.A for a Zoning Variance as outlined in the attached staff report. Public Comments: As required by the Unified Development Code, all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the subject property were notified of the Zoning Variance request (9 notices), a legal notice advertising the public hearing was placed in the Sun Newspaper (Sunday June 5, 2022) and signs were posted on-site. To date, staff has received 0 written comments in favor, and 0 in opposition to the request. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. The applicant has paid the required application fees. Page 83 of 118 SUBMITTED BY: Ryan Clark, Planner II ATTACHMENTS: Description Type [2022-5-VAR] ZBA Staff Report Cover Memo Exhibit 1 - Location Map Exhibit Exhibit 2 - Conceptual Plan Exhibit Exhibit 3 - Letter of Intent Exhibit Presentation Presentation Page 84 of 118 Zoning Board of Adjustment Planning Department Staff Report 2022-4-VAR QuikTrip 4184 Fuel Sales Northern Canopy Page 1 of 6 Report Date: Friday, June 17, 2022 Case No: 2022-5-VAR Project Planner: Ryan Clark, Planner II Item Details Project Name: QuikTrip 4183 Fuel Sales Southern Canopy Project Location: 3930 Shell Road, within City Council district No. 5. Legal Description: 7.970 acres of land in the William Roberts Survey, Abstract Number 524 Applicant: QT South LLC, c/o David Meyer Property Owner: QT South LLC, c/o David Meyer Request: Zoning Variance to the Fuel Sales Canopy height limit set by UDC Section 5.04.020.T. Case History: This is the first public hearing of this request. Page 85 of 118 Planning Department Staff Report 2022-4-VAR QuikTrip 4184 Fuel Sales Northern Canopy Page 2 of 6 Overview of Applicant’s Request The applicant is requesting a variance to the height limit for fuel sales canopies to allow for the overall canopy height of their proposed southern canopy to be 20 feet tall, a 17.6% variance to the UDC’s limit of 17 feet set in UDC 5.04.020.T.7. Site Information Location: The subject property is currently located south of the intersection of SH 195 and Shell Rd, and is currently in the development process for a gas station. Physical and Natural Features: The subject property is predominantly flat with little tree coverage. There are no significant environmental or other natural features on site. Future Land Use and Zoning Designations: The subject property has an existing Future Land Use designation of Community Center and is currently zoned General Commercial (C-3) and Highway Gateway Overlay district. Surrounding Properties: The subject property is located at the intersection of two major roadways surrounded by large non- residential properties that are primarily located within the ETJ. Nearby uses along Shell Road include self-storage facility, trucking company, and a church, as well as large residential lots (approximately 10 acre lots) located further to the west. Further to the south there is single-family residential development currently under construction. The Berry Creek Highlands mixed-use master planned community is also currently under construction further north along SH 195. The current zoning, Future Land Use designation, and existing uses of the adjacent properties to the north, south, east, and west are outlined in the table below: DIRECTION ZONING DISTRICT FUTURE LAND USE EXISTING USE North ETJ Community Center Undeveloped (across SH 195) East Agriculture (AG) Community Center Undeveloped South General Commercial (C-3) Community Center Undeveloped West General Commercial (C-3) Community Center Undeveloped Page 86 of 118 Planning Department Staff Report 2022-4-VAR QuikTrip 4184 Fuel Sales Northern Canopy Page 3 of 6 Approval Criteria The following are the pertinent sections of the Unified Development Code (UDC) related to this request: • UDC Section 5.04.020.T restricts the height of Canopies for the Fuel Sales Use to a minimum base height of 13 feet and a maximum height for the top of the canopy to 17 feet. Staff has reviewed the variance request and the applicant’s stated findings, and has evaluated the request based on the UDC required findings for a variance in accordance with UDC Section 3.15.030, which stated: Required Findings The Zoning Board of Adjustment may authorize a variance from the requirements of the zoning provisions of the UDC if the variance from the terms of the zoning provisions is not contrary to the public interest and, due to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the requirements would result in unnecessary hardship, so the spirit of this Code is preserved, and substantial justice done. No variance shall be granted unless the ZBA finds all of the required findings established in UDC Section 3.15.030.A. Staff has reviewed the submitted Zoning Variance request in accordance with the UDC and other applicable codes. Staff has determined that the request complies with 1 and does not comply with 6 of the 7 required findings established in UDC Section 3.15.030.A for a Zoning Variance as outlined below. Page 87 of 118 Planning Department Staff Report 2022-4-VAR QuikTrip 4184 Fuel Sales Northern Canopy Page 4 of 6 ZONING MAP VARIANCE APPROVAL CRITERIA 1. Extraordinary Conditions That there are extraordinary or special conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the provisions of this Unified Development Code will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of their land. For example, a Zoning Variance might be justified because of topographic or other special conditions unique to the property and development involved, while it would not be justified due to inconvenience or financial disadvantage. Does Not Comply There are no extraordinary or special conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the provisions of this Unified Development Code will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of their land. The applicants stated reasoning for the ability to serve certain types of vehicles through a higher clearance of the fueling canopy is not unique or beyond ordinary for the land involved, and would be of equal concern for any proposed fuel sales use in and out of Georgetown. Additionally, there were not sufficient findings to demonstrate that a canopy meeting the letter of the code couldn’t accommodate the applicant’s referenced 14’ vehicles. The UDC allows for a maximum height of 17’, and there was not sufficient information to demonstrate a canopy couldn’t be constructed that has a base height above 14’ and a max height at 17 feet. Additionally, the condition with which higher clearance is needed would be ordinary for any fuel sales use, and not just for this specific use at this specific property. 2. No Substantial Detriment That the granting of the Zoning Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or injurious to other property in the area or to the City in administering this Code. Complies Granting the variance will not be detrimental to the public health or safety as it will still be required to follow all safety codes such as the adopted 2015 International Building and Fire Codes. This property’s location along a highway and a major arterial roadway and the existing uses and zoning of nearby property mean that granting the variance will not be detrimental to the welfare of nearby properties and the area. Increasing the height of the canopy by 3’ will not affect the welfare of the highway, and the surrounding uses such as a nearby self-storage use and surrounding C-3 zoning will not be negatively impacted by a larger scale built form for the fuel sales use in the way that a scenic corridor or residential area would. 3. Other Property That the conditions that create the need for the Zoning Variance do not generally apply to other property in the vicinity. Does Not Comply There is not any evidence of unique conditions on the property. The height limits of the UDC measure height per UDC Section 7.02.030.D. as the “vertical distance between the lowest finished grade at the edge of the building or the base flood elevation, where applicable, and the highest point of the coping of a flat roof.” The issue of there not being enough clearance for a vehicle of a certain height would generally apply to any other property developing with fuel sales as each finished form would still place the finished grade where the vehicle would park 17’ below the top of the canopy. Page 88 of 118 Planning Department Staff Report 2022-4-VAR QuikTrip 4184 Fuel Sales Northern Canopy Page 5 of 6 ZONING MAP VARIANCE APPROVAL CRITERIA 4. Applicant's Actions That the conditions that create the need for the Zoning Variance are not the result of the applicant's own actions. Does Not Comply The conditions for which the application is requesting the Zoning Variance are the result of the Applicant’s own actions, as there is not an existing site constraint that prevents the construction of a compliant fuel canopy. Instead the applicant is seeking the variance to potentially serve a specific type of customer. 5. Comprehensive Plan That the granting of the Zoning Variance would not substantially conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and the purposes of this Code. Complies The Comprehensive Plan designates the area surrounding the subject property as a Community Center and a Highway Corridor along State Highway 195. The Overall Transportation Plan identifies Shell Road and State Highway 195 as arterial roadways. Because of the highly commercial and highway-oriented nature prescribed to this area by the Comprehensive Plan, increasing the height of the fuel canopies by 3 feet will not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan or the purposes of the UDC. The C-3 zoning district allows for buildings up to 60 feet in height and Low-Profile Pole Signs along Shell Road may be 20 feet in height. A 20-foot-tall fuel canopy will still generally be in line with the built form both allowed by the UDC and generally recommended by the Comprehensive Plan for Community Centers and along arterial roads. This canopy will be encompassed by non-residential uses and will be of equal height to a Low-Profile Pole Sign that could be constructed fronting Shell Road in the C-3 district. 6. Utilization That because of the conditions that create the need for the Zoning Variance, the application of this Code to the particular piece of property would effectively prohibit or unreasonably restrict the utilization of the property. Does Not Comply There is not sufficient information to demonstrate that the conditions that create the need for the Zoning Variance would unreasonably restrict the utilization of the property. While the applicant’s stated reason that Class A Motorhomes up to 14’ in height could collide with a canopy that is 13’ 6” at the base of the cover, there is not sufficient information to demonstrate that a canopy with a base above 14’ in height and maximum height of 17’ can’t be constructed. Additionally, if Class A motorhomes were unable to access the pumps under the canopy, there is not sufficient information to demonstrate that the pumps could not be modified so that a higher clearance vehicle could utilize it. Additionally, there was not sufficient information provided to demonstrate that the business cannot reasonably conduct fuel sales to vehicles under 13’ 6”, nor was there sufficient information provided to demonstrate that the retail convenience stores operation will be unreasonably inhibited by the fuel canopy height restriction. Page 89 of 118 Planning Department Staff Report 2022-4-VAR QuikTrip 4184 Fuel Sales Northern Canopy Page 6 of 6 ZONING MAP VARIANCE APPROVAL CRITERIA 7. Insufficient Findings The following types of possible findings do not constitute sufficient grounds for granting a Zoning Variance: a. That the property cannot be used for its highest and best use. b. That there is a financial or economic hardship. c. That there is a self-created hardship by the property owner or their agent. d. That the development objectives of the property owner are or will be frustrated. Does Not Comply There were not any findings that constituted granting a zoning variance. The applicant’s reasoning that granting the variance could allow for 14’ tall vehicles could be categorized as a financial hardship or that the property cannot be used for its highest and best use. That reasoning only demonstrates that a potential type of customer may not be able to effectively use the business and does not effectively demonstrate that the use cannot be reasonably operated. It also appears to be a self-created hardship since the applicant is seeking the variance to allow for 14’ tall vehicles, nor were there sufficient findings to demonstrate that a canopy couldn’t be constructed to allow for 14’ tall vehicles while still meeting the overall height limit of 17’. There were also not sufficient findings that a fuel pump could not be constructed on site without a canopy for high clearance vehicles while still providing a canopy for the majority of the fuel pumps on site. The requested Zoning Variance does not comply with 5 of the 7 approval criteria and complies with 2 of the 7. There is not an extraordinary or unique condition present on the property, and staff found that there was insufficient evidence to demonstrate that the fuel canopy height limit unreasonably restricts the use of the property. While the requested variance will not have a negative impact on the surrounding area and will not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan, there were not sufficient findings to constitute granting a Zoning Variance. Public Notification As required by the Unified Development Code, all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the subject property were notified of the Zoning Variance request (9 notices), a legal notice advertising the public hearing was placed in the Sun Newspaper (Sunday June 5, 2022) and signs were posted on-site. To date, staff has received 0 written comments in favor, and 0 in opposition to the request. Attachments Exhibit 1 – Location Map Exhibit 2 – Conceptual Plan Exhibit 3 – Letter of Intent Page 90 of 118 Location 2022-5-VAR Exhibit #1 LITT L E W A L N U T R D SCENICOAKSDR SH ELL RD CR 14 3 MESQ U I T E V A L L E Y R D LITT L E W A L N U T R D SH 1 9 5 SH 1 9 5 S H 195TN SH195 TN S H E L L S T O N E TRL 0 500250 Feet ¯ Site Parcels City Limits Georgetown ETJ Page 91 of 118 Vicinity MapVicinity Map CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TX N COVER SHEET A SHEET TITLE: SHEET NUMBER: DIVISION: DESIGNED BY: 1 © COPYRIGHT QUIKTRIP CORPORATION 2011ANY UNAUTHORIZED USE, REPRODUCTION,PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR SALE INWHOLE OR IN PART, IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. OR I G I N A L I S S U E D A T E : PROTOTYPE: VERSION: PROJECT NO.: DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY: RE V D A T E D E S C R I P T I O N B C D E F G H J K L M N P Q A B C D E F G H J K L M N P Q 2 3456789101112 13 14 15 1 2 3456789101112 13 14 15 41 8 3 S. H . 1 9 5 & S H E L L R D . GE O R G E T O W N , T X 4183.01 P-106 (05/01/21) 82 001 C. WOOD CWR JJV A SHEET TITLE: SHEET NUMBER: DIVISION: DESIGNED BY: 1 © COPYRIGHT QUIKTRIP CORPORATION 2011ANY UNAUTHORIZED USE, REPRODUCTION,PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR SALE INWHOLE OR IN PART, IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. OR I G I N A L I S S U E D A T E : PROTOTYPE: VERSION: PROJECT NO.: DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY: RE V D A T E D E S C R I P T I O N B C D E F G H J K L M N P Q A B C D E F G H J K L M N P Q 2 3456789101112 13 14 15 1 2 3456789101112 13 14 15 FOR REVIEW. THIS DOCUMENT IS RELEASED FOR THE PURPOSE OF REVIEW UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF JOSHUA J VALENTA, P.E. #114592 ON 6/21/2021. IT IS NOT TO BE USED FOR BIDDING, PERMIT, OR CONSTRUCTION, SH 1 9 5 SHELL R D IH 3 5 FM 2 3 4 SUN CIT Y BLVD 01 OF 73 SHEET INDEX SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE C001 COVER SHEET C002 PLAT SHEET 1 C003 PLAT SHEET 2 C020 TREE AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SHEET 1 C021 TREE AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SHEET 2 C022 TREE AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SHEET 3 C030 DEMOLITION PLAN C100 SITE DIMENSIONAL CONTROL PLAN C102 FIRE PROTECTION PLAN C103 SHELL ROAD WIDENING PLAN A100 ARCHITECTURAL FLOOR PLAN A201 ARCHITECTURAL EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SHEET 1 A202 ARCHITECTURAL EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SHEET 2 A701 ARCHITECTURAL TRASH ENCLOSURE PLAN N201 GAS CANOPY COORDINATION ELEVATIONS SHEET 1 N202 GAS CANOPY COORDINATION ELEVATIONS SHEET 2 C160 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN L100 LANDSCAPE PLAN C101 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN C150 UTILITY PLAN C151 OVERALL UTILITY PLAN C152 CITY OF GEORGETOWN UTILITY DETAILS SHEET 1 C153 CITY OF GEORGETOWN UTILITY DETAILS SHEET 2 C154 CITY OF GEORGETOWN UTILITY DETAILS SHEET 3 C155 UTILITY VERIFICATION PLAN C156 SANITARY SEWER PROFILE SHEET 1 C157 SANITARY SEWER PROFILE SHEET 2 C110 GRADING PLAN C111 DETAILED GRADING SHEET 1 C112 BUILDING DETAILED GRADING C113 STORE CANOPY GRADING PLAN C114 TC CANOPY GRADING PLAN C115 ADA COMPLIANCE REFERENCE PLAN C120 STORM PLAN C121 PRE-DEVELOPMENT WATERSHED MAP C122 POST-DEVELOPMENT WATERSHED MAP C123 TIME OF CONCENTRATION CALCULTIONS C124 MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN C125 DETENTION & WATER QUALITY POND PLAN C126 POND CALCULATIONS C127 TxDOT PRE-DEVELOPEMENT WATERSHED MAP C128 TxDOT POST-DEVELOPMENT WATERSHED MAP C200 CIP WALL PLANS SHEET 1 C201 CIP WALL PLANS SHEET 2 C202 CIP WALL PLANS SHEET 3 C203 CIP WALL 2 PLANS SHEET 1 C204 CIP WALL 2 PLANS SHEET 2 C205 CIP WALL 2 PLANS SHEET 3 C206 CIP WALL 2 PLANS SHEET 4 C300 STORM SEWER PROFILES SHEET 1 C301 STORM SEWER PROFILES SHEET 2 C302 STORM SEWER PROFILES SHEET 3 C500 MISC SITE DETAILS SHEET 1 C501 MISC SITE DETAILS SHEET 2 C510 ADA DETAILS SHEET 1 C511 ADA DETAILS SHEET 2 C520 PAVING DETAILS SHEET 1 C521 PAVING DETAILS SHEET 2 C522 PAVING DETAILS SHEET 3 C523 PAVING DETAILS SHEET 4 C524 TC PAVING DETAILS C525 CITY OF GEORGETOWN PAVING DETAILS SHEET 1 C526 CITY OF GEORGETOWN PAVING DETAILS SHEET 2 C530 TRENCHING DETAILS SHEET 1 C531 TRENCHING DETAILS SHEET 2 C540 DRAINAGE DETAILS SHEET 1 C541 DRAINAGE DETAILS SHEET 2 C550 TCEQ EROSION CONTROL DETAILS C560 TxDOT DETAILS SHEET 1 C561 TxDOT DETAILS SHEET 2 C562 TxDOT DETAILS SHEET 3 C563 TxDOT DETAILS SHEET 4 L500 LANDSCAPE DETAILS SHEET 1 L501 LANDSCAPE DETAILS SHEET 2 Page 92 of 118 S5 2 ° 1 2 ' 1 0 " W 2 0 5 . 7 0 ' S51° 30' 45"E 304.65' S58° 59' 58"E 172.89' S5 6 ° 1 4 ' 1 6 " W 2 0 0 . 1 0 ' S3 8 ° 2 8 ' 0 5 " W 3 6 1 . 0 5 ' BLOCK 1, LOT 1 BLOCK 1, LOT 2 N84° 1 7 ' 3 3 " E 1 0 7 . 4 7 ' S51° 31' 55.18"E 1061.23' N3 4 ° 1 6 ' 0 3 " E 13 0 . 5 9 ' L= 1 2 4 . 0 5 , R = 2 7 8 5 . 2 9 CB = S 3 5 ° 3 2 ' 3 6 . 3 4 " W CD = 1 2 4 . 0 4 0 S55°03'07"E 635.07' N 50 25 0 50 100 PAGE 1 OF 2 SHELL ROAD & S.H. 195 SUBDIVISION FINAL PLAT BLOCK 1, LOTS 1 & 2 9500 AMBERGLEN BLVD. BUILDING F, SUITE 125 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78729 TEL (512) 777-4600 FAX (512) 252-8141 TBPELS ENGINEERING FIRM #312 2020-___-___ NICHOLAS P. LESCHKE, PE 130255 DATE OCTOBER 12, 2020 ENGINEER: NICHOLAS P. LESCHKE P.E HALFF ASSOCIATES, INC. TBPE FIRM #F-312 9500 AMBERGLEN BLVD. BUILDING F SUITE 125 AUSTIN, TX 78729 NLESCHKE@HALFF.COM (512) 777-4600 SURVEYOR: SCOTT F. AMMONS, RPLS REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR TEXAS REGISTRATION NO. 6550 MATKIN-HOOVER ENGINEERING & SURVEYING FIRM NO.s #F-10024000 #F-10194347 8 SPENCER ROAD STE 300, BOERNE, TX 78006 SAMMONS@MATKINHOOVER.COM (830) 249-0600 FEMA: AREA OF MINIMAL FLOOD HAZARD ZONE X FEMA FLOOD ZONE MAP PANEL 48491C0285F EFF. 12/20/2019 OWNERS: MARION SHIPMAN AND RICKY SHIPMAN APPLICANTS/AGENTS NAME: DAVID MEYER, JR. ACREAGE OF TOTAL SITE: 7.970 ACRES TOTAL NUMBER OF BLOCKS: 1 BLOCK TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS: 2 LOTS A 7.970 ACRE TRACT OF LAND, OUT OF THE W. ROBERTS SURVEY, ABSTRACT 524, IN THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING A REPLAT OF THE REMAINDER OF LOTS 1, 2 AND 3 OF RIVER ROAD SUBDIVISION, RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. 2001078995, OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, AND A SUBDIVISION OF 5.00 ACRES OUT OF THE W. ROBERTS SURVEY, ABSTRACT 524. SURVEY LEGEND Page 93 of 118 PAGE 2 OF 2 2020-___-___ METES AND BOUNDS A 7.970 ACRE TRACT OF LAND, OUT OF THE W. ROBERTS SURVEY NO. 4, ABSTRACT 524, IN THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS BEING PART OF THE REMAINDER OF LOTS 1, 2 AND 3 OF RIVER ROAD SUBDIVISION, RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. 201078995 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS AND ALL OF THE REMAINING PORTION OF A 5.00 ACRE TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2003101243 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS. SAID 7.970 ACRE TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A FOUND TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (TXDOT) RIGHT-OF-WAY (R.O.W.) MONUMENT, TYPE II, IN THE SOUTHWEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY 195, A VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY, AS SHOWN ON THE TXDOT R.O.W. MAP CSJ NO. 0440-01-036 & 0440-02-012, THE SOUTHEAST R.O.W. LINE OF SHELL ROAD AS SHOWN ON SAID TXDOT R.O.W. MAP FOR THE WEST END OF A CUTBACK, THE MOST WESTERLY NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE REMAINDER OF SAID LOT 1 AND OF THE TRACT DESCRIBED HEREIN; THENCE: N 84° 17' 33" E, WITH THE SAID CUTBACK, THE NORTHWEST LINE OF THE REMAINDER OF SAID LOT 1, THE TRACT DESCRIBED HEREIN AND THE SOUTHWEST R.O.W. LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY 195 AS SHOWN ON SAID TXDOT R.O.W. MAP, A DISTANCE OF 123.69 FEET, TO A SET 12" IRON ROD WITH A RED PLASTIC CAP STAMPED "MATKIN-HOOVER ENG. & SURVEYING" FOR THE EAST END OF SAID CUTBACK, THE MOST EASTERLY NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE REMAINDER OF SAID LOT 1 AND THE TRACT DESCRIBED HEREIN; THENCE: S 55° 03' 07" E, WITH THE NORTHEAST LINE OF THE REMAINDER OF SAID LOTS 1, 2 AND 3, THE TRACT DESCRIBED HEREIN AND SAID SOUTHWEST R.O.W. LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY 195, AT 180.19 FEET, A FOUND 12" IRON ROD WITH A CAP, FOR THE COMMON CORNER OF THE REMAINDER OF SAID LOTS 1 AND 2, AT 476.70 FEET, A FOUND 58" IRON ROD FOR THE COMMON CORNER OF THE REMAINDER OF SAID LOTS 2 AND 3, AND CONTINUINGFOR A TOTAL DISTANCE OF 635.07 FEET, TO A FOUND TXDOT R.O.W. MONUMENT, TYPE II, IN THE NORTHEAST LINE OF THE REMAINDER OF SAID LOT 3 AND SAID SOUTHWEST R.O.W. LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY 195; THENCE: S 58° 59' 58" E, WITH THE NORTHEAST LINE OF THE REMAINDER OF SAID LOT 3, THE TRACT DESCRIBED HEREIN AND SAID SOUTHWEST R.O.W. LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY 195, A DISTANCE OF 172.89 FEET, TO A SET 12" IRONROD WITH A RED PLASTIC CAP STAMPED "MATKIN-HOOVER ENG. & SURVEYING" FOR THE COMMON CORNER OF THE REMAINDER OF SAID LOTS 3 AND 4; THENCE: S 52° 12' 10" W, DEPARTING THE NORTHEAST LINE OF THE REMAINDER OF SAID LOTS 3 AND 4 AND SAID SOUTHWEST R.O.W. LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY 195, WITH THE COMMON LINE BETWEEN SAID LOTS 3 AND 4, A DISTANCE OF 205.70 FEET, TO A FOUND 12" IRON ROD, IN THE NORTH LINE OF SAID 5.00 ACRE TRACT OF LAND AND FOR THE COMMON CORNER OF SAID LOTS 3 AND 4; THENCE: S 51° 30' 45" E, WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID 5.00 ACRE TRACT AND THE SOUTH LINE OF THE REMAINDER OF SAID LOT 4, A DISTANCE OF 304.65 FEET, TO A SET 12" IRON ROD WITH A RED PLASTIC CAP STAMPED "MATKIN-HOOVER ENG. & SURVEYING" IN THE WEST LINE OF A CALLED 5.00 ACRE TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2015110506, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, FOR THE SOUTH CORNER OF SAID LOT 4 AND THE EAST CORNER OF THE TRACT DESCRIBED HEREIN; THENCE: S 56° 14' 16" W, WITH THE COMMON LINE BETWEEN SAID 5.00 ACRE TRACTS DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2003101243 AND DOCUMENT NO. 2015110506, A DISTANCE OF 200.10 FEET, TO A FOUND 38" IRON ROD, IN THESOUTH LINE OF SAID 5.00 ACRE TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2009048703 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, FOR THE COMMON CORNER OF SAID 5.00 ACRE TRACTS AND THE TRACT DESCRIBED HEREIN; THENCE: N 51° 31' 55" W, WITH THE COMMON LINE OF SAID 5.00 ACRE TRACTS, A DISTANCE OF 1070.84 FEET, TO A FOUND 12" IRON ROD, IN SAID SOUTHEAST R.O.W. LINE OF SHELL ROAD AND THE NORTHWEST LINE OF THE TRACT DESCRIBED HEREIN, FOR THE COMMON CORNER OF SAID 5.00 ACRE TRACTS AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE TRACT DESCRIBED HEREIN; THENCE: N 34° 14' 58" E WITH SAID SOUTHEAST R.O.W. LINE OF SHELL ROAD, THE NORTHWEST LINE OF SAID 5.00 ACRE TRACTS, OF SAID LOT 1 AND THE TRACT DESCRIBED HEREIN, AT 191.42 FEET, A FOUND 12" IRON ROD WITH CAP, FOR THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID 5.00 ACRE TRACT AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE REMAINDER OF SAID LOT 1, A TOTAL DISTANCE OF 243.48 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING 7.970 ACRES OF LAND SITUATED IN THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS. BENCHMARK TABLE BM #100 SET MAG NAIL WITH WASHER IN A CONCRETE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE ON NORTHWEST SIDE OFSHELL ROAD AS SHOWN HEREON ELEV: 773.27' BM #200 SET COTTON SPINDLE IN ASPHALT ON SOUTHWEST SIDE OF EASTBOUND HWY 195FRONTAGE ROAD AS SHOWN HEREON ELEV: 771.81' NOTES 1. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF RECENT STREET CONSTRUCTION OR REPAIR AT TIME OF THIS SURVEY. 2. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF WETLANDS ACCORDING TO: HTTP://WWW.FWS.GOV/WETLANDS/DATA/MAPPER.HTML. THE WERE NO WETLAND AREAS DELINEATED OR FIELD MARKED BY THE APPROPRIATE AUTHORITIES AT THE TIME OF THIS SURVEY. 3. THE CLOSEST FIRE HYDRANT IS LOCATED ALONG THE SOUTHWEST ROW LINE OF HIGHWAY 195, APPROXIMATELY 1345' FROM THE EAST CORNER OF THE SUBJECT TRACT. 4. UTILITY CONTACT INFORMATION: ELECTRIC SERVICES PEDERNALES ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE INC. PHONE: 888-554-4732 GAS SERVICES ATMOS ENERGY PHONE: 888-286-6700 CABLE AND TELEPHONE SERVICES FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS PHONE: (800) 921-8101 FIBER LIGHT LLC PHONE: 844-509-0775 QUANTA TELECOM SERVICES PHONE: 713-629-7600 WATER SERVICES CITY OF GEORGETOWN PHONE: (512) 930-3640 SEWER SERVICES (WASTEWATER) NONE - CITY OF GEORGETOWN IS NEARBY PHONE: (512) 930-3640 5. THE NEAREST ACCESS POINTS TO THE SOUTHWEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF HIGHWAY 195 AND THE SOUTHWEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF WEST SHELL ROAD ARE AS FOLLOWS: 5a. AN ASPHALT DRIVEWAY INTERSECTS THE SOUTHEAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SHELL ROAD APPROXIMATELY 295' IN A SOUTHWESTERLY DIRECTION, FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SUBJECT TRACT. 5b. AN ASPHALT DRIVEWAY INTERSECTS THE SOUTHWEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF HWY 195 AT THE EAST CORNER OF THE SUBJECT TRACT AND ALSO APPROXIMATELY 370' SOUTHEAST OF THE EAST CORNER OF THE SUBJECT TRACT. 6. SURVEYOR IS UNAWARE OF ALL PROPOSED CHANGES TO STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES. 7. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF RECENT BUILDING CONSTRUCTION OR DEMOLITION WORK AT THE TIME OF THIS 9500 AMBERGLEN BLVD. BUILDING F, SUITE 125 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78729 TEL (512) 777-4600 FAX (512) 252-8141 TBPELS ENGINEERING FIRM #312 A 7.970 ACRE TRACT OF LAND, OUT OF THE W. ROBERTS SURVEY, ABSTRACT 524, IN THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING A REPLAT OF THE REMAINDER OF LOTS 1, 2 AND 3 OF RIVER ROAD SUBDIVISION, RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. 2001078995, OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, AND A SUBDIVISION OF 5.00 ACRES OUT OF THE W. ROBERTS SURVEY, ABSTRACT 524. STATE OF TEXAS § § KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON § I, MARION SHIPMAN AND RICKY SHIPMAN, CO-OWNERS OF THE CERTAIN 7.970 ACRE TRACT OF LAND SHOWN HEREON AND DESCRIBED IN A DEED RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2001078995 AND DOCUMENT NO. 2003101243 OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, [AND DO HEREBY STATE THAT THERE ARE NO LIEN HOLDERS OF THE CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND], AND DO HEREBY SUBDIVIDE SAID TRACT AS SHOWN HEREON, AND DO HEREBY CONSENT TO ALL PLAT NOT REQUIREMENTS SHOWN HEREON, AND DO HEREBY DEDICATE TO WILLIAMSON COUNTY THE STREETS, ALLEYS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY, EASEMENTS AND PUBLIC PLACES SHOWN HEREON FOR SUCH PUBLIC PURPOSES AS THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN MAY DEEM APPROPRIATE. THIS SUBDIVISION IS TO BE KNOWN AS QUIKTRIP 4183. TO CERTIFY WHICH, WITNESS BY MY HAND THIS _____ DAY OF ___________________, 20____. __________________________________ ___________________________________ MARION SHIPMAN RICKY SHIPMAN P.O. BOX 1119 P.O. BOX 1711 CEDAR PARK, TX 78630-1119 LEANDER, TX 78464-1711 STATE OF TEXAS § § KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON § BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED, A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID COUNTY AND STATE, ON THIS DAY PERSONALLY APPEARED MICHAEL WRIGHT, MANAGER, SHELL-HWY 195, LLC, KNOWN TO ME TO BE THE PERSON WHOSE NAME IS SUBSCRIBED TO THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE THIS ____ DAY OF __________________, 20____. NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS MY COMMISSION EXPIRES ON: PLANNING DIRECTOR I, SOFIA NELSON, PLANNING DIRECTOR OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THIS PLAT IS APPROVED FOR FILING OF RECORD WITH THE COUNTY CLERK OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS. __________________________________ _______________ SOFIA NELSON, PLANNING DIRECTOR DATE PLANNING AND ZONING THIS SUBDIVISION TO BE KNOWN AS SHELL ROAD & S.H. 195 SUBDIVISION HAS BEEN ACCEPTED AND APPROVED FOR FILING OF RECORD WITH THE COUNTY CLERK OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE GEORGETOWN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ON THE ____ DAY OF _________, 20____. __________________________________ _______________ ERCEL BRASHEAR, CHAIRMAN DATE __________________________________ _______________ BEN STEWART, SECRETARY DATE CITY FLOODPLAIN COORDINATOR BASED UPON THE ABOVE REPRESENTATIONS OF THE ENGINEER OR SURVEYOR WHOSE SEAL IS AFFIXED HERETO, AND AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PLAT AS REPRESENTED BY THE SAID ENGINEER OR SURVEYOR, I FIND THAT THIS PLAT COMPLIES WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 15.44, FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION, OF THE GEORGETOWN MUNICIPAL CODE. THIS CERTIFICATION IS MADE SOLELY UPON SUCH REPRESENTATIONS AND SHOULD NOT BE RELIED UPON FOR VERIFICATIONS OF THE FACTS ALLEGED. THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN DISCLAIMS ANY RESPONSIBILITY TO ANT MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC OR INDEPENDENT VERIFICATIONS OF THE REPRESENTATION, FACTUAL OR OTHERWISE, CONTAINED IN THIS PLAT AND THE DOCUMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH IT. __________________________________ _______________ WESLEY WRIGHT, P.E., CFM, FLOODPLAIN COORDINATOR DATE CITY OF GEORGETOWN WILLIAMSON COUNTY FLOOD PLAIN ADMINISTRATOR BASED UPON THE REPRESENTATIONS OF THE ENGINEER OR SURVEYOR WHOSE SEAL IS AFFIXED HERETO, AND AFTER REVIEW OF THE PLAT AS REPRESENTED BY THE SAID ENGINEER OR SURVEYOR, I FIND THAT THIS PLAT COMPLIES WITH THE WILLIAMSON COUNTY FLOODPLAIN REGULATIONS. THIS CERTIFICATION IS MADE SOLELY UPON SUCH REPRESENTATIONS AND SHOULD NOT BE RELIED UPON FOR VERIFICATIONS OF THE FACTS ALLEGED. WILLIAMSON COUNTY DISCLAIMS ANY RESPONSIBILITY TO ANY MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC FOR INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF THE REPRESENTATIONS, FACTUAL OR OTHERWISE, CONTAINED IN THIS PLAT AND THE DOCUMENTS ASSOCIATED WITHIN IT. __________________________________ _______________ J. TERRON EVERTSON, P.E., D.R., C.F.M. DATE WILLIAMSON COUNTY FLOODPLAIN ADMINISTRATOR STATE OF TEXAS § § KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS; COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON § I, NANCY E. RISTER, CLERK OF THE COUNTY COURT OF SAID COUNTY, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT IN WRITING, WITH ITS CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION WAS FILED FOR RECORD IN MY OFFICE ON THE ____ DAY OF _______, 20___ A.D., AT ____O'CLOCK, ___.M., AND DULY RECORDED THIS THE DAY OF ________, 20___ A.D., AT ____ O'CLOCK, ____.M., IN THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY IN INSTRUMENT NO. ________. TO CERTIFY WHICH, WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL AT THE COUNTY COURT OF SAID COUNTY, AT MY OFFICE IN GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, THE DATE LAST SHOWN ABOVE WRITTEN. ___________________________________ NANCY E. RISTER, CLERK COUNTY COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS BY: ___________________,DEPUTY GENERAL NOTES: 1. UTILITY PROVIDERS FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT ARE: 1.1. WATER: CITY OF GEORGETOWN PHONE: 512-930-3640 1.2. WASTEWATER/SEPTIC: NONE. CITY OF GEORGETOWN IS NEARBY PHONE: 512-930-3640 1.3. ELECTRIC: PEDERNALES ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE INC. PHONE: 888-554-4732 2. ALL STRUCTURES/ OBSTRUCTIONS ARE PROHIBITED IN DRAINAGE EASEMENTS. 3. THERE ARE NO AREA WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THIS SUBDIVISION IN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN AS DEFINED BY FIRM MAP NUMBER 48491C0285E EFFECTIVE DATE OF SEPTEMBER 26TH 2008. 4. IN ORDER TO PROMOTE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM A STRUCTURE, THE SLAB ELEVATIONS SHOULD BE BUILT AT LEAST ONE-FOOT ABOVE THE SURROUNDING GROUND, AND THE GROUND SHOULD BE GRADED AWAY FROM THE STRUCTURE AT A SLOPE OF 12" PER FOOT FOR A DISTANCE OF AT LEAST 10 FEET. 5. ALL SEDIMENTATION, FILTRATION, DETENTION, AND/OR RETENTION BASINS AND RELATED APPURTENANCES SHOWN SHALL BE SITUATED WITHIN A DRAINAGE EASEMENT OR DRAINAGE LOT. THE OWNERS, HOA, OR ASSIGNEES OF THE TRACTS UPON WHICH ARE LOCATED SUCH EASEMENTS, APPURTENANCES, AND DETENTION FACILITIES SHALL MAINTAIN SAME AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR MAINTENANCE, ROUTINE INSPECTION AND UPKEEP. 6. ANY HERITAGE TREE AS NOTED ON THIS PLAT IS SUBJECT, IN PERPETUITY, TO THE MAINTENANCE, CARE, PRUNING AND REMOVAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN. APPROVED REMOVAL DOES NOT REQUIRE MODIFICATION OF THE PLAT. 7. ALL INDIVIDUAL LOTS CONTAINING HERITAGE TREES ARE CONFIGURED AND DESIGNED SO THAT THE LOT IS DEVELOPABLE FOR THE INTENDED PURPOSE WITHOUT REQUIRING REMOVAL OF THE HERITAGE TREES OR EXCEEDING THE PERCENTAGE OF ALLOWABLE DISTURBANCE WITHIN THE HERITAGE TREES CRZ. 8. IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE PLAT NOTES - NON-RESIDENTIAL LOTS: 8.1. THE MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE PER NON-RESIDENTIAL LOT SHALL BE PURSUANT TO THE UDC AT THE TIME OF THE SITE PLAN APPLICATION BASED ON THE ZONING DESIGNATION OF THE PROPERTY. 9. THE LANDOWNER ASSUMES ALL RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, OR ROAD WIDENING EASEMENTS. BY PLACING ANYTHING IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OR ROAD WIDENING EASEMENTS, THE LANDOWNER INDEMNIFIES AND HOLDS THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, WILLIAMSON COUNTY, THEIR OFFICERS, AGENTS AND EMPLOYEES HARMLESS FROM ANY LIABILITY OWING TO PROPERTY DEFECTS OR NEGLIGENCE NOT ATTRIBUTABLE TO THEM AND ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS MAY BE REMOVED BY THE CITY AND/OR COUNTY AND THAT THE OWNER OF THE IMPROVEMENTS WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE RELOCATION AND/OR REPLACEMENT OF THE IMPROVEMENTS. 10. THE BUILDING OF ALL STREETS, ROADS, AND OTHER PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES AND ANY BRIDGES OR CULVERTS NECESSARY TO BE CONSTRUCTED OR PLACED IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNERS OF THE TRACT OF LAND COVERED BY THIS PLAT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS PRESCRIBED BY THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN AND/OR WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS. NEITHER THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN NOR WILLIAMSON COUNTY ASSUMES ANY OBLIGATION TO BUILD ANY OF THE STREETS, ROADS, OR OTHER PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES SHOWN ON THIS PLAT OR OF CONSTRUCTING ANY OF THE BRIDGES OR DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. NEITHER THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN NOR WILLIAMSON COUNTY ASSUMES ANT RESPONSIBILITY FOR DRAINAGE WAYS OR EASEMENTS IN THE SUBDIVISION OTHER THAN THOSE DRAINING OR PROTECTING THE ROAD SYSTEM AND STREETS IN THEIR RESPECTIVE JURISDICTIONS. 11. NEITHER THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN NOR WILLIAMSON COUNTY ASSUMES ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OF REPRESENTATIONS BY OTHER PARTIES IN THESE PLAT. FLOODPLAIN DATA, IN PARTICULAR, MAY CHANGE DEPENDING ON SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENT. IT IS FURTHER UNDERSTOOD THAT THE OWNERS OF THE TRACT OF LAND COVERED BY THIS PLAT MUST INSTALL ALL THEIR OWN EXPENSE ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AND SIGNAGE THAT MAY BE REQUIRED BEFORE THE STREETS IN THE SUBDIVISION HAVE FINALLY BEEN ACCEPTED FOR MAINTENANCE BY THE CITY AND / OR COUNTY. 12. RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENTS FOR WIDENING ROADWAYS OR IMPROVING DRAINAGE SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE LANDOWNER UNTIL ROAD OR DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ARE ACTUALLY CONSTRUCTED ON THE PROERTY. THE CITY AND/OR COUNTY HAVE THE RIGHT AT ANY TIME TO TAKE POSSESSION OF ANY ROAD WIDENING EASEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION, IMPROVEMENT, OR MAINTENANCE OF THE ADJACENT ROAD. 13. THIS PLAT IS SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN WATER CONSERVATION ORDINANCE. 14. THE SUBDIVISION SUBJECT TO THIS APPLICATION IS SUBJECT TO THE WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN. 15. A GEOLOGIC ASSESSMENT, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS, WAS COMPLETED ON SEPTEMBER 13, 2019. ANY SPRINGS AND STREAMS AS IDENTIFIED IN THE GEOLOGIC ASSESSMENT ARE SHOWN HEREIN. I, NICHOLAS P. LESCHKE, LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER IN THE STATE OF TEXAS, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SUBDIVISION IS IN THE EDWARDS AQUIFER RECHARGE ZONE AND IS NOT ENCROACHED BY A ZONE A FLOOD AREA, AS DENOTED HEREIN, AND IS DEFINED BY FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION FLOOD HAZARD BOUNDARY MAP, COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER 48491C0285E, EFFECTIVE DATE SEPTEMBER 26, 2008, AND THAT EACH LOT CONFORMS TO THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN REGULATIONS. THE FULLY DEVELOPED, CONCENTRATED STORMWATER RUNOFF RESULTING FROM THE ONE HUNDRED (100) YEAR FREQUENCY STORM IS CONTAINED WITHIN THE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS SHOWN AND/OR PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY DEDICATED BY THIS PLAT. TO CERTIFY WHICH, WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL AT GEORGETOWN, WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, THIS ___ DAY OF _____, 20__. ___________________________________ NICHOLAS P. LESCHKE REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER NO. 130255 STATE OF TEXAS STATE OF TEXAS § § KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS; COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON § I, SCOTT F. AMMONS, REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF TEXAS, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT IS TRUE AND CORRECTLY MADE FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE ON THE GROUND OF THE PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED HEREON, AND THAT THERE ARE NO APPARENT DISCREPANCIES, CONFLICTS, OVERLAPPING OF IMPROVEMENTS, VISIBLE UTILITY LINES OR ROADS IN PLACE, EXCEPT AS SHOWN ON THE ACCOMPANYING PLAT, AND THAT THE CORNER MONUMENTS SHOWN THEREON WERE PROPERLY PLACED UNDER MY SUPERVISION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS. TO CERTIFY WHICH, WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL AT GEORGETOWN, WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, THIS ____ DAY OF _____, 20__. ___________________________________ SCOTT F. AMMONS REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR NO. 6550 STATE OF TEXAS WILLIAMSON COUNTY ON-SITE SEWAGE FACILITIES (OSSR) CERTIFICATION BASED UPON THE ABOVE REPRESENTATIONS OF THE ENGINEER OR SURVEYOR WHOSE SEAL IS AFFIXED HERETO, AND AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PLAT AS REPRESENTED BY THE SAID ENGINEER OR SURVEYOR, I FIND THAT THIS PLAT COMPLIES WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE EDWARDS AQUIFER REGULATIONS FOR WILLIAMSON COUNTY AND WILLIAMSON COUNTY ON-SITE SEWAGE FACILITY REGULATIONS. THIS CERTIFICATION IS MADE SOLELY UPON SUCH REPRESENTATIONS AND SHOULD NOT BE RELIED UPON FOR VERIFICATIONS OF THE FACTS ALLEGED. THE WILLIAMSON COUNT ENGINEER'S OFFICE AND WILLIAMSON COUNTY DISCLAIMS ANY RESPONSIBILITY TO ANY MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC FOR INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF THE REPRESENTATIONS, FACTUAL OR OTHERWISE, CONTAINED IN THIS PLAT AND THE DOCUMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH IT. ___________________________________ _______________ J. TERRON EVERTSON, P.E., D.R., C.F.M. DATE WILLIAMSON COUNTY ENGINEER SHELL ROAD & S.H. 195 SUBDIVISION FINAL PLAT BLOCK 1, LOTS 1 & 2 Page 94 of 118 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X RE V D A T E D E S C R I P T I O N 41 8 3                                                     SW C H W Y 1 9 5 & S H E L L R D GE O R G E T O W N , T E X A S 7 8 6 3 3 OR I G I N A L I S S U E D A T E :                                                                                                                                                                                                                         1 2 Q 345 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Q P P PROJECT NO.:19-5027 N N M M L L K K J J H H G G © COPYRIGHT QUIKTRIP CORPORATION 2011ANY UNAUTHORIZED USE, REPRODUCTION,PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR SALE IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. F PROTOTYPE: VERSION: DIVISION: DESIGNED BY: F 82 DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY: NT KP E E X D X X X X X X X X X X X X X XXX X XX X X XXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X D C C SHEET TITLE: B ALTA SURVEY SHEET NUMBER: B A 30 15 0 1 2 345 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 30 15 60 A X X X N &,7<2)*(25*(72:1352-(&7126'3 Page 95 of 118 X XXXX X X X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXX X X XXXXXXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 1 2 Q 345 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Q P P PROJECT NO.:19-5027 N N M M L L K K J J H H G G © C O P Y R I G H T Q U I K T R I P C O R P O R A T I O N 2 0 1 1 ANY UNAUTHORIZED USE, REPRODUCTION,PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR SALE INWHOLE OR IN PART, IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. F PROTOTYPE: VERSION: DIVISION: DESIGNED BY: F 82 DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY: NT KP E E D D C C SHEET TITLE: B ALTA SURVEY SHEET NUMBER: B A 30 15 0 1 2 345 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 30 15 60 A XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX RE V D A T E D E S C R I P T I O N 41 8 3                                                                                        SW C H W Y 1 9 5 & S H E L L R D GE O R G E T O W N , T E X A S 7 8 6 3 3 OR I G I N A L I S S U E D A T E :                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            N &,7<2)*(25*(72:1352-(&7126'3 Page 96 of 118 STATE HIGHWAY 195 VARIABLE WIDTH R.O.W. ROW CSJ. NO. 0440-01-036 & 0440-02-012 W W 31 K D I E S E L ( 1 0 ' Ø ) 18K B I O D I E S E L ( 1 0 ' Ø ) 10 K D E F ( 1 0 ' Ø ) SUB M E R G E D PUM P SUBM E R G E D PUM P 31 K D I E S E L ( 1 0 ' Ø ) ANN U L A R SUBM E R G E D PUM P FIL L FILL ANN U L A R ANN U L A R ANN U L A R SUB M E R G E D PUM P FIL L FIL L PRO B E PRO B E PRO B E PRO B E 20K U N L E A D E D ( 1 0 ' Ø ) SUBM E R G E D PUM P FILL VEN T VAP O R PRO B E ANN U L A R 20K U N L E A D E D ( 1 0 ' Ø ) SUBM E R G E D PUM P FILL VEN T VAP O R PRO B E ANN U L A R 20 K P R O D U C T X ( 1 0 ' Ø ) SUBM E R G E D PUM P FILL VEN T VAP O R PRO B E ANN U L A R 20 K P R E M I U M ( 1 0 ' Ø ) SUBM E R G E D PUM P FILL VEN T VAP O R PRO B E ANN U L A R C.O. C.O. C.O. C.O. C.O. C.O. C.O. S87° 5 2 ' 5 9 " W 2 0 2 5 . 2 0 ' TO P A T E N T T R A C T C O R N E R (SCA L E D ) SH E L L R O A D 14 0 ' R . O . W . RO W C S J . N O . 0 4 4 0 - 0 1 - 0 3 6 & 0 4 4 0 - 0 2 - 0 1 2 30 15 0 30 60 N SITE LEGENDSITE DIMENSIONAL CONTROL NOTES ” SITE LIGHTING FIXTURE TABLE CITY OF GEORGETOWN PARKING CALCULATIONS Qu i k T r i p N o . A SHEET TITLE: SHEET NUMBER: DIVISION: DESIGNED BY: 1 © COPYRIGHT QUIKTRIP CORPORATION 2011 ANY UNAUTHORIZED USE, REPRODUCTION, PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR SALE IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. OR I G I N A L I S S U E D A T E : PROTOTYPE: VERSION: PROJECT NO.: DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY: RE V DA T E DE S C R I P T I O N B C D E F G H J K L M N P Q A B C D E F G H J K L M N P Q 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 41 8 3 S. H . 1 9 5 & S H E L L R D . GE O R G E T O W N , T X 4183.01 P-106 (05/01/21) 82 001 C. WOOD CWR JJV Qu i k T r i p N o . A SHEET TITLE: SHEET NUMBER: DIVISION: DESIGNED BY: 1 © COPYRIGHT QUIKTRIP CORPORATION 2011 ANY UNAUTHORIZED USE, REPRODUCTION, PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR SALE IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. OR I G I N A L I S S U E D A T E : PROTOTYPE: VERSION: PROJECT NO.: DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY: RE V DA T E DE S C R I P T I O N B C D E F G H J K L M N P Q A B C D E F G H J K L M N P Q 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 FOR REVIEW. THIS DOCUMENT IS RELEASED FOR THE PURPOSE OF REVIEW UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF JOSHUA J VALENTA, P.E. #114592 ON 6/21/2021. IT IS NOT TO BE USED FOR BIDDING, PERMIT, OR CONSTRUCTION, EN G I N E E R I N G & S U R V E Y I N G DRIVEWAY SPACING EXHIBIT C100 IMPERVIOUS COVER REQUIREMENTS Page 97 of 118 Page 98 of 118 Page 99 of 118 Page 100 of 118 QuikTrip 4183 Fuel Sales Southern Canopy 2022-5-VAR June 21, 2022 | Zoning Board of Adjustment Page 101 of 118 2 Item Under Consideration 2022-5-VAR •Public Hearing and possible action on a Zoning Variance from the fuel sales canopy height limit pursuant to Section 5.04.020 of the Unified Development Code, for the property located at 3930 Shell Road, bearing the legal description of 7.970 acres of land in the William Roberts Survey, Abstract Number 524 (2022- 5-VAR). Ryan Clark, Planner II Page 102 of 118 3 Page 103 of 118 4 Outdoor Self- Storage Church Page 104 of 118 5 Location of Canopy for 4-VAR Proposed Site Plan SH 195 Shell Road Location of Canopy for 5-VAR Page 105 of 118 6 17’ height at base, 20’ 6” at top Exhibit of proposed Fuel Sales Canopy Canopy Support Posts Page 106 of 118 7 Zoning Variance The Zoning Board of Adjustment may authorize a Zoning Variance from the requirements of the zoning provisions of this Unified Development Code if the Variance from the terms of the zoning provisions is: •Not contrary to the public interest •Due to special conditions •A literal enforcement of the requirements would result in unnecessary hardship •The spirit of this Code is preserved •Substantial justice done Page 107 of 118 8 Approval Criteria –UDC Section 3.15.030 Criteria for a Variance Complies Partially Complies Does Not Comply 1. Extraordinary Conditions X 2. No Substantial Detriment X 3. Other Property X 4. Applicant’s Actions X 5. Comprehensive Plan X 6. Utilization X 7. Insufficient Findings X Page 108 of 118 9 Approval Criteria 1. Extraordinary Conditions That there are extraordinary or special conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the provisions of this Unified Development Code will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of their land. For example, a Zoning Variance might be justified because of topographic or other special conditions unique to the property and development involved, while it would not be justified due to inconvenience or financial disadvantage. Page 109 of 118 10 Approval Criteria 2. No Substantial Detriment That the granting of the Zoning Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or injurious to other property in the area or to the City in administering this Code. 3. Other Property That the conditions that create the need for the Zoning Variance do not generally apply to other property in the vicinity. Page 110 of 118 11 Outdoor Self- Storage Church Page 111 of 118 12 Approval Criteria 4. Applicant’s Actions That the conditions that create the need for the Zoning Variance are not the result of the applicant's own actions. 5. Comprehensive Plan That the granting of the Zoning Variance would not substantially conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and the purposes of this Code. Page 112 of 118 13 Approval Criteria 5 –Comprehensive Plan, Highway Corridors •Commercial, retail, and mixed-uses to capitalize on highway visibility •Auto-oriented layouts •Lighting oriented for automobiles •Large scale monument signs Page 113 of 118 14 Approval Criteria 6. Utilization That because of the conditions that create the need for the Zoning Variance, the application of this Code to the particular piece of property would effectively prohibit or unreasonably restrict the utilization of the property. Page 114 of 118 15 Approval Criteria 7. Insufficient Findings The following types of possible findings do not constitute sufficient grounds for granting a Zoning Variance: •That the property cannot be used for its highest and best use. •That there is a financial or economic hardship. •That there is a self-created hardship by the property owner or their agent. •That the development objectives of the property owner are or will be frustrated. Page 115 of 118 16 Approval Criteria –UDC Section 3.15.030 Criteria for a Variance Complies Partially Complies Does Not Comply 1. Extraordinary Conditions X 2. No Substantial Detriment X 3. Other Property X 4. Applicant’s Actions X 5. Comprehensive Plan X 6. Utilization X 7. Insufficient Findings X Page 116 of 118 17 Public Notifications •9 property owners within the 300’ buffer •Notice in Sun News on Sunday, June 5 •Signs posted on the property •To date, staff has received: •0 written comments IN FAVOR •0 written comments OPPOSED Page 117 of 118 18 Summary •Public Hearing and possible action on a Zoning Variance from the fuel sales canopy height limit pursuant to Section 5.04.020 of the Unified Development Code, for the property located at 3930 Shell Road, bearing the legal description of 7.970 acres of land in the William Roberts Survey, Abstract Number 524 (2022- 5-VAR). Ryan Clark, Planner II •Four votes (a supermajority (3/4) vote of the Board) are required to grant a Variance. A variance that does not receive four votes is considered denied. (Code of Ord. 2.29.040) •When making a motion, the Board must make a finding of the criteria. Page 118 of 118