HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda_DTPG_03.05.2020Notice of Meeting for the
Downtown P arking Garage Stakeholder Steering Committee
of the City of Georgetown
March 5, 2020 at 3:00 P M
at City Hall Community Room located at 808 Martin L uther K ing Jr Street
Georgetown, T X
T he C ity of G eorgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If you
require as s is tance in partic ipating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the ADA, reas onable
as s is tance, adaptations , or ac commodations will be provided upon request. P leas e c ontact the C ity S ec retary's
O ffic e, at leas t three (3) days prior to the sc heduled meeting date, at (512) 930-3652 or C ity Hall at 808 Martin
Luther King Jr. S treet, G eorgetown, T X 78626 for additional information; T T Y users route through R elay
Texas at 711.
L egislativ e Regular Agenda
A Approval of the Downtown P arking G arage S takeholder S teering C ommittee Meeting minutes from the
F ebruary 13, 2020 meeting - Danella Elliott - C ommittee Liaison
B P resentation of updated parking garage preliminary rendering, based on recommendations from the
F ebruary 13th meeting - Eric Johns on, F ac ilities Director
C P resentation of the updated design concepts for the parking garage - Michael Walton and Linda Mc C alla -
C o-C hairs of the P arking G arage
Adjournment
Ce rtificate of Posting
I, R obyn Densmore, C ity S ecretary for the C ity of G eorgetown, Texas, do hereby c ertify that this Notic e of
Meeting was posted at C ity Hall, 808 Martin Luther King Jr. S treet, G eorgetown, T X 78626, a plac e readily
acc es s ible to the general public as required by law, on the _____ day of _________________, 2020, at
__________, and remained s o posted for at leas t 72 c ontinuous hours prec eding the s cheduled time of said
meeting.
__________________________________
R obyn Dens more, C ity S ec retary
Page 1 of 85
City of Georgetown, Texas
Downtown Parking Garage Stakeholder Steering Committee
March 5, 2020
S UB J E C T:
Approval of the Downtown P arking G arage S takeholder S teering C ommittee Meeting minutes from the
F ebruary 13, 2020 meeting - Danella Elliott - C ommittee Liais on
IT E M S UMMARY:
Approval of the Downtown P arking G arage S takeholder S teering C ommittee Meeting minutes from the
F ebruary 13, 2020 meeting.
F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
N/A
S UB MIT T E D B Y:
Danella S . Elliott
AT TAC H ME N T S:
Description Type
Draft Minutes - February 13, 2020 Backup Material
Page 2 of 85
Minutes of Meeting of the
Downtown Parking Garage Stakeholder Steering Committee Meeting
City of Georgetown, Texas
February 13, 2020
The Downtown Parking Garage Stakeholder Steering Committee met on Thursday, February 13, 2020,
at 3:00 PM in the Community Room at City Hall, 808 Martin Luther King Jr Street, Georgetown, Texas.
The City of Georgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act
(ADA). If you require assistance in participating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined
under the ADA, reasonable assistance, adaptations, or accommodations will be provided upon
request. Please contact the City Secretary’s Office, at least three (3) days prior to the scheduled meeting
date, at (512) 930-3652 or City Hall at 808 Martin Luther King Jr Street for additional information;
TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711.
Board Members Present: City Staff Present:
Michael Walton, Co-Chair
Linda McCalla, Co-Chair
Mickie Ross
Scott Firth
Larry Olson
Shawn Hood
Chris Damon
Laurie Brewer, Assistant City Manager
Sofia Nelson, Planning Director
Eric Johnson, CIP Manager
Danella Elliott, Executive Assistant
Eric Lashley, Library Director
Travis Baird, Real Estate Coordinator
Trish Long, Facilities Manager
Mayra Cantu, Management Analyst
Michaela Dollar, Economic Development Director
Amanda Still, Arts & Culture Coordinator
Board Members Absent:
Kay Briggs resigned from committee on 1/16/2020
Others present:
Fabio Serrato, WGI Representative (via Zoom)
Legislative Regular Agenda
Michael Walton, Co-Chair, called the meeting to order at 3:04 p.m.
A. Approval of the Downtown Parking Garage Stakeholder Steering Committee Meeting
minutes from the January 8, 2020 meeting – Danella Elliott – Committee Liaison
Motion to approve minutes by Larry Olsen; second by Chris Damon. Approved 7-0.
B. Update from February 13, 2020 Council Workshop – David Morgan, City Manager and
Laurie Brewer, Assistant City Manager
Laurie gave a synopsis of the presentation that David gave at the February 11, 2020 Council
Workshop. She noted that we have had a lot of public input and discussion and there is a general
consensus that 1) we do need improved parking downtown; 2) parking structures should be
considered; 3) we definitely need a more robust public input process, and 4) we need to study other
sites for potential parking solutions. The recommendation was to 1) pause on the 6th and Main
location but get to a full conceptual review, including renderings (considering that if the treatment
of the facades would be good at one location, it is likely that it would be supported at other locations
in downtown) and to 2) change the scope of the existing consultant (WGI) to expand the study and
Page 3 of 85
review other sites, taking into account current demands. A lot has happened since 2015 and with
all of the new development, current demands, etc. 3) we need to utilize a public stakeholder process
to establish criteria for review, i.e. What does success look like? What are the success factors? We
just need to come up with criteria that the majority can all agree on and would feel comfortable
presenting this recommendation to Council. Staff suggestions for potential criteria that were
relevant are: 1) fiscally responsible, 2) consistent with the Downtown Master Plan for criteria in a
location that meets the demand. The plan is to return on March 12th to Council to revise the scope.
Chris asked if the committee’s mission/scope has changed and Laurie said that the Council would
still like to see the concepts that this committee is developing. If we can get the committee to a
point where they feel good about the conceptual designs, then we would just pause. This work that
the committee has done has been helpful. At least 4 members of Council said that the work has
been helpful; they want that work to continue.
Chris asked if the mission/scope of this committee is to come up with the best possible solution for
this location and something that this committee would be comfortable recommending to Council
in terms of the design contract. Larry said that he feels we are very close conceptually, and Laurie
said that the timing is right. We have the $348K contract to go through full design, including rough
construction, and we don’t want to go too far down the road if it is decided that 6th and Main is not
the right spot, then we have not wasted our efforts to date. Eric said it was not hourly contract, but
it could be put on pause. Michael said that he heard that the idea of whatever the recommendations
from the committee are, then it could be repurposed somewhere else. If we come up with a design
proposal that everyone felt could be this committee’s recommendation, then that is where they
would pause. Laurie noted that it would be site specific and may change slightly if another location
was chosen. Larry said if the site changes, residential or more commercial/retail, etc could be
incorporated. He asked about the need to engage business owners and neighborhoods in the city,
and asked if this committee could be redirected to be stakeholders in that to come up with options,
opportunities and differences, and to come up with a different location, etc. Laurie said that this
direction from Council just came earlier this week, and we are still figuring out the next steps. She
noted that we do need to engage all stakeholders, but that this committee has been a very engaged
stakeholder group.
Chris said that he felt it was important to address the “elephant in the room” and important to
discuss it. When he was approached to be a member of this committee, he was asked to bring his
best intentions and good faith to a collaborative process; knowing that “magic can happen” when
different people with different ideas and philosophies get together to co-create and hopefully come
up with something great. It has been his experience that when a so-called “dream team” gets
together, true magic can occur and he had hoped this would be the case for creating something in
the place that everyone loves – our downtown. He acknowledged that everyone expresses their
affection and love for our downtown in different ways. He would love to have an infrastructure
solution for our town, as we need it desperately. He was asked, and it was given in a straightforward
way, to make this location work (at 6th and Main), even though it is a complicated location. He
feels betrayed and believes that some committee members have taken the work of this committee
to work against it and have used staff resources and material collected as their personal opposition
research for scuttling the project. The presentation from some members that was given to Council
was full of distortions and outrages, and quite frankly, he was appalled. The perception was that
this committee had come up with these conclusions, and that was completely false. He feels Larry
and Scott have gone rogue and this type of behavior will not work when we are working in
opposition to each other. He feels it is inappropriate when everyone agreed to do this
collaboratively, with the right to disagree, but emphasized that we can’t sabotage our own
efforts…it doesn’t work. He asked that if they were going to remain on the committee, then to
please do it in good faith, but he is concerned that things have been said and done to scuttle the
project and stab everyone in the back when they are not looking. Chris feels it is unethical, immoral
and absolutely not right. He holds them to a higher standard and again said, it will not work and
will tear the community apart. He said that talking points from this committee show up on
Facebook and other remarkable similarities on points made turn up on social media, friends get
Page 4 of 85
hate mail and threats for voicing their opinion about wanting a place for their customers to park,
and said that this is not right and not the place for it. He asked them to please be activists on their
own time, but do not take the work from this committee to be the basis to self-sabotage the work
that has been done. He asked that Larry and Scott “please cease that activity” because it is of
utmost importance to be neighborly.
Larry said he would speak to the concerns from Chris, since his name was mentioned. He said he
has worked hard on a design that could get through HARC and has been up front with it and very
direct on his feelings and feels that the current conceptual design is much more acceptable. He
never looked at this committee to be the one to decide if this location was the right location and has
separated his thoughts between what he is doing here (on the committee) and giving his input on
the design aspects of it, which he thinks he’s done pretty actively and believes it has gone in the
right direction. He does have other thoughts on the broader issue. 3 weeks ago the neighborhood
was very excited, and Tuesday the neighborhood became a lot different. He has worked to get
them to understand the process and how it went, the steps and opinions stated to get them to be
more positive, and he thinks it occurred. His work and comments on this committee are not
proprietary and he already knew the information prior to the committee agenda postings. His work
is to advocate for a parking garage for a design that could ultimately fit on that site and he feels he
has done that. Some people have disagreed, but that is where his focus has been and where his
focus continues to be and apologized if his intentions were misunderstood, but that is where his
focus was on this committee. That has been his approach at this table.
Scott said he has been very open during every meeting and after his discussion with Councilmember
John Hesser. The discussion they had (and mentioned July or August minutes) was very clear that
location was part of the mission, noting that this location would certainly drive the design aspects,
including the external appearance, as well as internal design and location. He was told that Council
had not decided on the location, or he would not have accepted to participate on this committee.
He was happy to participate, knowing that there would be a thoughtful exchange based on data, not
emotion, of what needs to happen to make downtown prosperous for everyone, which has been his
motivation in everything he has talked about. During Council workshop, has presented public
information and he has made his intention very clear every time he has presented. He has always
said it is “his opinion” and always based it on the data. Everything we have talked about has been
public, as these are open meetings. He has always come with his best intentions and attended every
meeting, because he believes very firmly in this. He wants to make sure we have the best solution
for the city of Georgetown. He understands where Chris is coming from, as a business owner with
a huge stake in the downtown and knows that wants it to be prosperous. Nobody wants the square
situation to be a repeat of the 80’s.
Michael said the answer to Chris’ question, (which was on the list in May or June) from Council is
that is that this committee’s mission was not/is not up to this committee; it is not our mission to
decide on location. Unfortunately for Scott, it was after John Hesser left the Council. Michael said
it has come up in these meetings ever since and it has been a challenge in that regard…that we
asked, we were told “no” and it still comes up.
Michael said that he has a PDF of the Options #7 and #8 design options on his phone, and has been
asked numerous times why we are not sharing these with the public or Council. He is a little
frustrated that Council has not seen these. He feels that we have made great progress on the design,
and after the last meeting, everyone agreed that the choices agreed upon were Options #7 and #8.
On each agenda, the last item is always public outreach, and to help with the Chris’ concerns, he
feels that these options definitely need to get out there so that everyone can see what the committee
has come up with and tell them what is going on, as he feels we have made great strides and have
good options and should at least be proud of that and go from there. It is important to show where
we started and the progress to what we have come up with now.
Page 5 of 85
Chris said he is very committed to doing his best work in service towards meaningful parking
infrastructure for downtown Georgetown. But if the point is to scuttle infrastructure, to eliminate
the possibility of it and sour public opinion on it, then he feels we have a big problem. Chris
clarified that he is just letting everyone know how he feels, and right now, he has a trust issue with
what Larry and Scott’s agenda is, and it is worrisome that there is a secret agenda to sabotage
infrastructure downtown rather than to provide solutions for one. He thanked everyone for letting
him publicly voice his opinion and reiterated that he is willing to work with everyone to work
together and come up with the best possible product for downtown and if we can all agree that this
is our motivation, then we can do magic.
Larry said that he is not trying to sabotage anything and he has been at every meeting to focus on
the design aspect, including pricing, as that is an integral part of any project he has ever done. He
believes that we are at a really good point to focus on some really good designs and to finalize some
good conceptual aspects of the project. He feels he has been an integral part of this process and he
said today, as he did at Council workshop, he strongly supports a vibrant, profitable and diverse
downtown and feels he has been upfront with everyone he has talked to. It is good for the
downtown and his neighborhood. At every meeting, he has focused solely on the design, trying to
make it something that could pass HARC.
C. Review of revised exterior designs for the North, East & South elevations based on the
committee’s design discussions at the January 8, 2020 meeting – Eric Johnson, Facilities
Director and Fabio Serrato, WGI Representative via Zoom Meeting
D. Review cost estimates for the design option with 3 levels of parking above grade and 1 parking
level below grade as presented at the January 8, 2020 meeting - Eric Johnson, Facilities
Director and Fabio Serrato, WGI Representative via Zoom Meeting
E. Review cost estimates for the revised Main St elevation (both 4 level and 3 levels above grade)
as reviewed with the Committee at the January 8, 2020 meeting - Eric Johnson, Facilities
Director and Fabio Serrato, WGI Representative via Zoom Meeting
F. Review cost estimates for the revised elevations to be reviewed at the February 13, 2020
meeting for the North, East & South elevations – Eric Johnson, Facilities Director and Fabio
Serrato, WGI Representative via Zoom Meeting
Eric thanked Fabio for being available via Zoom and explained that the following discussion would
not flow as Items C, D, E and F, but that during discussion, etc, everything should be addressed,
but if not, to let him know and we would address any concerns.
Fabio showed conceptual designs of Options #7 and #8 and he reminded everyone that they are not
final at all. They have incorporated feedback and made revisions as requested. He reminded the
committee that they are proposing to do the façade in brick precast (split face block, thin brick)
panels. Eric showed the samples. Eric contacted Gate Precast out of Hillsboro, and they came
down and brought samples of the thin brick, which is about ¾” brick, but noted that these are not
the colors they are suggesting. He said that the proposal is to have a split faced block on the side
that faces 7th street (south side) to save money because it is significantly less expensive than full
face.
Larry said that he had been involved in doing projects for years, and although the finish is nice,
especially close to it, but when you see it from 50-100 feet away, it just looks like a concrete block
wall. You miss the texture and all you see is the grout lines of a concrete block. Eric said that
aesthetics could be achieved when you mix in different colors and textures, speckles, etc. Eric
showed another example and mentioned again about the cost savings vs. a full face brick. It can
be staggered, stacked or running bond, and it all depends on what is chosen. Fabio showed the
ornamental patterns as illustrations, and explained that there are many options that could even be
Page 6 of 85
used as branding for downtown Georgetown. The idea would be to have some type of offset
between the brick façade and metal panels. Option #7 is with all 4 levels above grade. The very
top of the structure 43’9”, which is staying below the 44’ limitations, with a partial basement level,
not fully underground, but a little below grade area. Larry mentioned that the limitation is 40’,
with the option of the Planning Director to add another 10%, based on special conditions. He asked
Sofia if those conditions have already been met, and if she had already made a ruling before it even
gets to that point. He again said that the UDC code says 40’ in this area, and he wanted everyone
to understand that.
Shawn asked if there was a way to conceivably modify Option #7 to get to the 40’ ruling. Fabio
said that they could and the idea here is to have a cover over the stairs and over the elevator tower
at the SW corner, so we could not go much lower than that. The NW corner could be modified,
but the caveat that would lose the cover over the stairs. Chris noted that UDC code gives 10%
either way and doesn’t understand why there is concern for that, as it is in-bounds of the 10%
leeway rule. Larry said the UDC states that the height cannot exceed 40’ and Chris added, with a
10% variance. Larry said “for special conditions” and that is exactly the problem he has…it is not
supposed to be automatic in the UDC. Sofia clarified and said that she wants to make it perfectly
clear that it is not automatic. It goes under special review of the contents and the criteria that
outlines the exceptions, and then the determination is made. She added that just because it has been
done in other projects, she made it perfectly clear that it was not an automatic situation, there is
absolutely a vetting process.
Shawn asked if the panels were affixed to the wall or floating from the wall. Fabio replied that the
idea is to have it attached to the concrete, creating the illusion of offset. The thickness of brick
panels would be 8-9”, and the metal panels would be less than that. Mickie reminded everyone
that the original buildings on the square were Mesker Brothers buildings, which means that they
had the ornamental patterns ordered out of the Mesker Brothers catalogs to put those buildings
together, so inclusions of these would be very appropriate for the history of our buildings.
Michael asked for a summary between the differences of what we saw last time and this time. It is
about the same, with adding the north elevation:
• Option #7 – 4 levels above grade
• Option #8 – 3 levels above grade; 1 level below grade
• The general aesthetic is the same for both, but less of it for #8.
Larry said that Option #8 is something he could live with because the height and massing fits well
within that neighborhood and the top goes right to the top of the new second story for the old
Council Chambers. 4 levels above grade is just too much; it is the same massing that Eric Visser
proposed twice and got defeated at HARC and at City Council. If we really want to try to get it
passed through HARC, he feels it has to be 3 levels above grade and 1 level below grade. Mickie
reminded everyone that Larry’s statement is not the consensus of the entire committee. While
everyone may prefer that, others recognize that it may need to be 4 levels above grade due to other
constraints, and it is possible through HARC to be that size. Chris is not afraid of having full size
buildings in this area. In most of history, there has been a tall building in that location and only in
recent years have they been torn down and become short buildings. This is a historical precedent,
and it seems disingenuous that massing and scale are inappropriate because in the past, taller
buildings were there originally. Michael said that the missing piece of information is the cost, and
the cost of both should be presented, and the general public feedback will play a factor in the final
decision.
Fabio showed the 6th street side (north elevation). He showed the two elevations and explained that
the treatment would be very similar to the west elevation with the brick panels and ornamental
panels. Scott asked about pedestrian access on the east side of the garage and Fabio said that
another stairwell could and would need to be added if desired. The stairs are limited within the
Page 7 of 85
travel distance as required by code. Eric explained that the 5’ access to a potential new building is
not what he thinks it is.
Michael asked for clarification on the height numbers: Option #7 is 28’ and 43’ (due to the ramping
within the garage and stairwell) but it matches the height for the elevator on both sides. Fabio said
3 levels above grade and (1 below Option #8 would be 21’ relative to the ground level.)
Clarification and discussion on the pedestrian access, parking in the back, tree size and type along
sidewalks, and walking to the front of the garage. Eric noted that the depth of the garage from
Main street back is about 170’, which is not very deep. Retail, security, including fall
protection/barrier height, and other elements in question were discussed, but noted that security is
of utmost importance. Eric asked if there was a general consensus on what was shown to everyone
with the 6th Street aesthetic, and the committee agreed. Larry is still concerned about cladding vs.
real brick.
Discussion on the Opinion of Probable Construction Cost and Option #7 and Option #8 renderings
are below. Descriptions show the costs associated with choices on façade design. These costs are
intended to show a range, but as a reminder, as changes are made, costs could either go up or down.
Fabio clarified that these costs are adjusted from national average to apply to the city index and this
is how they arrived at these costs.
Larry asked for a cost estimate using real brick/real stone vs the cladding. Eric and Fabio explained
that the panels were “real” brick, just not as thick and do not require the labor to brick and mortar
it. Larry said he understood, but it was still just brick tiles. He said that in his opinion, it might
look good on a shopping mall or across from a stadium, but in the 9 block historically sensitive
Page 8 of 85
overlay, it has never been done in the overlay, much less in the downtown. Michael clarified that
Larry was concerned about the aesthetic of this and he said he was. Michael asked if he had visited
the sights provided and Larry said he had not seen the TCU garage or shopping mall in downtown
Austin, but had seen it used before in some areas.
Michael asked Eric if he and Fabio could provide a general cost overview on Larry’s request. Eric
said we could provide that, keeping in mind that the costs would go up as we would have to build
a CMU wall to attach the brick to, etc.
Shawn inquired about the Main street elevation of #7 and #8 or 6th street elevation of #7 and #8 and
asked if it was conceivable (with the awning wrapping and the NE wraparound corner from the
awning down, to use traditional limestone up to the bottom side of the awning) and from a human
scale personal touch have legitimate limestone and have our cast in place from the awning above?
Discussion followed on precast panels vs cast in place, and Eric and Fabio said we could look at
costs for this suggestion. Larry said this might be better because you need the real stuff down
where people were walking, etc.
Michael asked if the costs were “all in” and included all costs. Eric said these are probable
constructions costs, which do not include demo, digging holes, and site prep does not include
utilities; Larry said he thought these costs were approximately $700-750K soft costs. Michael
asked Eric to show all projects costs involved as a grand total when this is presented.
Larry asked if any escalation costs were built in? Eric said that escalation costs (or percentage)
was not built into these numbers. These are probable costs, not bids, so these are based on a concept
we have. It would not do any good to add escalation at this point as changes, requests, etc are still
being added and in the past, when we have done that, people have taken those numbers and added
an additional contingency cost of 10% . We are being very careful what we present, and reminded
everyone that these are not bids, but opinion of probable cost and we are in in this very early stage
of conceptual design. These are not what our construction costs are. These do not include
contingency. We are not even at concept at this point. Larry said you always include contingency.
Michael said that these costs are not a bid, but a response to the committee’s request from the last
meeting to put some costs associated with based on these designs. We know these are not the final
costs.
Chris asked if through the time/requests made through the committee, the committee has partially
escalated these costs. Chris said we have elected to create this number with our changes and
additional requests, i.e., the difference in the original approximate amount of $5M costs vs. what
we are seeing now is what we have created; not the basic garage originally proposed. He reminded
everyone that it is our choice to have those numbers. So, if we created these numbers, he feels it
would be a fair statement to say that it would then be awkward if we offered these numbers and
then lambasted them.
Scott said that the internal design has not changed, and he is not a fan of that.
Storage: Larry asked about the expensive storage area, and Eric replied that he had to excavate
soil there because it is bad and parking spots could not be utilized in that spot without a lot of
additional costs, so that is why there is storage.
Technology Sensors, etc: As we move through design and identify what type of technology we
are looking for, then the costs associated with the number and type of sensors needed will drive the
cost on the system that is chosen. The entry is designed to add gates if in the future to charge.
Linda said that there is a group of highly opinionated people who do not understand the concept of
infill design. They feel it is not ok to add anything new to downtown and in reality, it has been
Page 9 of 85
evolving from the beginning. A lot of modifications were done in the 80’s, and a lot of new
construction is happening now, but it seems that anything new that is proposed gets huge backlash.
Chris said that they probably feel completely powerless because they cannot do anything about the
growth to the west and therefore, we get the backlash downtown because they cannot or do not
know how to point their anger, resulting in it coming out in the wrong place. Because this is a city
project, people are angry today about things they don’t even know about. We need to figure out a
way to show progress, share with the public, and believes that it will benefit the entire project. It
is worth trying and calm everyone down just a little bit, based on what we have.
Larry said that we should be held to the same standards as other developers. He said that he feels
Option #8 can pass HARC, and personally, he doesn’t think #7 can.
Chris informally polled committee members:
To Larry:
• Is #8 at a point where you could advocate it?
o He is still concerned about the south elevation, but the 3 level version works, and
he will support the 3 level garage and advocate it despite its elevated price tag.
• If we choose Option #8 design, could he justify the elevated price at HARC and Council
that this committee created?
o He would not advocate for the price, but would for the design. Price isn’t discussed
at HARC; that would be up to the owners (City Council).
• Could Larry advocate for modified Option #7?
o Larry NO; too high, too tall and too massive. He could certainly advocate and
support some version of Option #8 and thinks it would pass HARC; you don’t
discuss price. He thinks this design fits. If that is the question, then yes.
To Scott:
• Scott would not advocate for either. He has made it very clear that the internal structure,
(dead ends, 150 spaces on 6.21 grade; congestion at the entrance and exit impact the
handicapped parkers that have to go through that congestion point to get to the square.
Traffic congestion going in, going down and up are real issues.
• The internal design is where he has issues and has been very consistent on that.
o The internal design hasn’t really even changed at all. He is pleased with the progress
of the external appearance, but will not support the internal design.
o If internal changes were addressed, he would support it.
• Nobody has ever said this could not happen, but the committee has been told
that this is the most efficient design for this footprint. But it is not a good
design from Scott’s perspective.
• Things that could possibly be changed are the entrance on Main, exit going out
by Galaxy, ramps on one side; flat surfaces on the other. He would support
the external design that had a full façade all the way around.
o He would like to get public feedback on the internal design; the public
might say they agree or might not, but he will not advocate for
something he doesn’t agree with.
• Michael clarified with Scott that he wouldn’t use it?
o No because small cars will have no problem, but dual cab pickup would not park in it.
To Michael:
• Michael prefers lower height and also thinks it looks better in general.
• It is hard to picture what we have seen and how it would look. Below grade is a better
option in a visual aspect, but in reality, we just need to come up with something we can
agree on at this point.
Chris:
Page 10 of 85
• He wonders how we can advocate for a design if we ourselves can’t sell it. He thinks we
can all be super proud of what we have worked on. This is the absolute best concept and
believes it is better to be a unified committee saying this is good and we like it.
• Chris is not afraid of 40’ and said that we are making history now, and there has to be a
place for modern history. This is a present from this committee will be someone else’s
history.
o Chris is not afraid of having full size buildings in this area. In most of history, there
has been a tall building in that location and only in recent years have they been torn
down and become short buildings.
Shawn:
• He asked if it was possible to keep the same elevation, but extend the NE wrap-around
corner to include the 2 doors (from the approximate 10’ presently to about 20’). He
would like to see the exposure increased on this side. There would be a little more cost
involved, but it would be a common suggestion on both 3 and 4 levels. Everyone agreed
it would provide a more finished look.
Mickie:
• Mickie reminded everyone that the original buildings on the square were Mesker Brothers
buildings, which means that they had the ornamental patterns ordered out of the Mesker
Brothers catalogs to put those buildings together, so the inclusions of these would be very
appropriate for the history of our building.
• Mickie said that Larry’s opinion that the 3 levels above and 1 level below is not the
consensus of the entire committee. While everyone may prefer that, others recognize that
it may need to be 4 levels above grade due to other constraints, and it is possible through
HARC to be that size.
Linda:
• Linda said that there is a group of highly opinionated people who do not understand the
concept of infill design. They feel it is not ok to add anything new to downtown, but in
reality, it has been evolving from the beginning. A lot of modifications were done in the
80’s, and a lot of new construction is happening now, but it seems that anything new that
is proposed gets huge backlash.
G. Next steps and public input – Laurie Brewer, Assistant City Manager
Laurie said the last item was feedback and informed the committee that Kay Briggs has resigned
from the committee.
• Laurie said we can discuss the public engagement process later, and we want to get as much
stakeholder engagement as possible. Aly VanDyke, our Communications Director has
some ideas that can be discussed later.
• Michael asked “what’s next” and wanted to know how we get the design work out to the
public.
• Laurie said that staff (working with the engagement group) will come up with some ideas
and slides for Michael and Linda to present at the March 10th Council Workshop of the
updated designs, progress, etc.;
• This committee will meet prior to the Council workshop; Danella will send out some
potential dates to set the next meeting.
• Michael asked for an electronic version of the slides to review updated renderings and the
opinion of probable costs; this will be e-mailed out;
• Michael feels like there is so many angry, negative things out amongst the public and we
need to alleviate these concerns. He feels some people’s fear is the way the first design
Page 11 of 85
looks, but realizing that when the new recommendation design goes out, there may be a
completely separate group that doesn’t like it either.
Citizen Comment: Kris Bailey, CEO of Eevee spoke about his parking management, ground
transport services, shuttles, and advertising of autonomous vehicles. A resident reached out to him
and he introduced himself to Council, and now is speaking to this committee about microtransit
experts specializing in First/Last mile solutions
He said that Public transportation is the future of transit. Deployment of a functional first/last mile
solution has a direct result of increased ridership on mass transport.
Complements TNCs and ride hailing services at airports. Eevee reduces parking management stress
by creating mobility zones utilizing shuttles and taxis in downtown districts and at airports.
At Eevee, we fully believe and commit to adding autonomy to transport, increasing safety and
reliability
The meeting adjourned at 5:20 p.m.
__________________________________
Michael Walton Linda McCalla
Board Co-Chair Board Co-Chair
_____
Date
Page 12 of 85
City of Georgetown, Texas
Downtown Parking Garage Stakeholder Steering Committee
March 5, 2020
S UB J E C T:
P res entation of updated parking garage preliminary rendering, bas ed on rec ommendations from the
F ebruary 13th meeting - Eric Johnson, F acilities Direc tor
IT E M S UMMARY:
P res entation of updated parking garage preliminary rendering, bas ed on rec ommendations from the
F ebruary 13th meeting. T his is still "work in progress" and will be updated an refined prior to the C ity
C ouncil Works hop on Marc h 10th.
F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
N/A
S UB MIT T E D B Y:
Eric Johns on, F ac ilities Director
AT TAC H ME N T S:
Description Type
Preliminary rendering of parking garage Backup Material
Page 13 of 85
Preliminary Rendering – still a work in progress, and will be updated and refined prior to the Council Workshop:
Page 14 of 85
City of Georgetown, Texas
Downtown Parking Garage Stakeholder Steering Committee
March 5, 2020
S UB J E C T:
P res entation of the updated des ign c onc epts for the parking garage - Mic hael Walton and Linda Mc C alla -
C o-C hairs of the P arking G arage
IT E M S UMMARY:
P res entation of the updated des ign c onc epts for the parking garage - Mic hael Walton and Linda Mc C alla -
C o-C hairs of the P arking G arage
F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
N/A
S UB MIT T E D B Y:
Mic hael Walton and Linda Mc C alla - P arking G arage C o-C hairs
AT TAC H ME N T S:
Description Type
Updated Parking Garage Pres entation Pres entation
Survey Res ults Backup Material
Page 15 of 85
Downtown Parking Garage
Stakeholder Steering Committee
3-10-2020
1Page 16 of 85
Overview
TIMELINE SURVEY DESIGN COST
2Page 17 of 85
Members of the Committee
•Co-Chair: Linda McCalla
•Co-Chair: Michael Walton
•Kay Briggs (Resigned as of January 2020)
•Chris Damon
•Scott Firth
•Shawn Hood
•Larry Olson
•Mickie Ross
3Page 18 of 85
Committee Timeline
June 2019
Created Committee
24 June 2019
First Meeting
22 July 2019
Meeting
12 Aug. 2019
Meeting
17 Sep. 2019
Meeting
15 Nov. 2019
Meeting
12 Dec. 2019
Meeting
8 Jan. 2020
Meeting
13 Feb. 2020
Meeting
5 Mar. 2020
Meeting/Stopping
Point on Design
Committee has met 9 times since June 20194Page 19 of 85
Public Engagement
Survey Committee
Meetings
In-person
engagement
National Night
Out
Preservation
Georgetown
5Page 20 of 85
Stakeholder Engagement Method
Merchants Breakfast Bites 9/11 meeting
Nearby Residential Owners Postcard and in-person meeting
Downtown Patrons Postcard by registers directing people to go to online survey
Market Days-table by the courthouse
CVB
Nearby Commercial Building Owners Postcard and in person meeting
People who work downtown Breakfast Bites 9/11 meeting
Preservation Georgetown In person meeting with opportunity to provide instant feedback
Downtown Georgetown Alliance In person meeting with opportunity to provide instant feedback
Citywide Neighborhood Associations Email blasts from the neighborhood association lists; utilize neighborhood night
out to distribute information.
Downtown churches Meeting with email asking them to share survey link with parishioners
Young Professionals Group On the table type conversation to solicit discussion and feedback
Downtown and Old Town Property Owners Mailed postcard directing people to go to online survey
Stakeholder Engagement Plan
6Page 21 of 85
Preference Survey
•Closed on October 30, 2019
•Members passed these cards
out:
•The Square
•In businesses
•National Night Out
7Page 22 of 85
Location
Considered at
the Time
Design
Committee
Began
8Page 23 of 85
Encroachment
9Page 24 of 85
Conceptual
Layout
10Page 25 of 85
Concept 7
4 Levels Above Grade
As of 2.13.2020
11Page 26 of 85
12Page 27 of 85
13Page 28 of 85
Concept 8
3 Levels Above Grade 1 Below Grade Level
As of 2.13.2020
14Page 29 of 85
15Page 30 of 85
16Page 31 of 85
Comparison
Concept 7 and Concept 8
17Page 32 of 85
North Elevation Along E. 6th Street
3 Levels Above Grade 1 Below Grade Level4 Levels Above Grade
18Page 33 of 85
West Elevation Along Main Street
3 Levels Above Grade 1 Below Grade Level4 Levels Above Grade
19Page 34 of 85
East Elevation
4 Grades Above
20Page 35 of 85
South Elevation
4 Grades Above
21Page 36 of 85
Preliminary Rendering
4 Grade Above 22Page 37 of 85
Design does not include landscaping and other finishing details, as design has been paused to re-study locations
23Page 38 of 85
Support
•Majority of the committee has
stated their support of the
conceptual design to date
24Page 39 of 85
Questions?
25Page 40 of 85
34.93%474
20.93%284
18.42%250
15.84%215
7.52%102
2.36%32
Q1 Steel mesh screening with brick accent
Answered: 1,357 Skipped: 18
TOTAL 1,357
No way!
No
Meh
Ok
Cool
Fantastic!
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
No way!
No
Meh
Ok
Cool
Fantastic!
1 / 76
Downtown Georgetown Parking Garage
Page 41 of 85
8.19%111
9.52%129
13.14%178
29.89%405
23.17%314
16.09%218
Q2 Full facade
Answered: 1,355 Skipped: 20
TOTAL 1,355
No way!
No
Meh
Ok
Cool
Fantastic!
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
No way!
No
Meh
Ok
Cool
Fantastic!
2 / 76
Downtown Georgetown Parking Garage
Page 42 of 85
41.87%569
18.69%254
9.71%132
9.20%125
13.47%183
7.06%96
Q3 Art panels or banners
Answered: 1,359 Skipped: 16
TOTAL 1,359
No way!
No
Meh
Ok
Cool
Fantastic!
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
No way!
No
Meh
Ok
Cool
Fantastic!
3 / 76
Downtown Georgetown Parking Garage
Page 43 of 85
16.59%225
17.04%231
12.02%163
17.77%241
18.51%251
18.07%245
Q4 Green wall or planters
Answered: 1,356 Skipped: 19
TOTAL 1,356
No way!
No
Meh
Ok
Cool
Fantastic!
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
No way!
No
Meh
Ok
Cool
Fantastic!
4 / 76
Downtown Georgetown Parking Garage
Page 44 of 85
9.78%133
9.34%127
16.99%231
33.90%461
19.63%267
10.37%141
Q5 Brick and glass
Answered: 1,360 Skipped: 15
TOTAL 1,360
No way!
No
Meh
Ok
Cool
Fantastic!
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
No way!
No
Meh
Ok
Cool
Fantastic!
5 / 76
Downtown Georgetown Parking Garage
Page 45 of 85
42.80%583
21.95%299
9.18%125
9.62%131
10.87%148
5.58%76
Q6 Mural
Answered: 1,362 Skipped: 13
TOTAL 1,362
No way!
No
Meh
Ok
Cool
Fantastic!
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
No way!
No
Meh
Ok
Cool
Fantastic!
6 / 76
Downtown Georgetown Parking Garage
Page 46 of 85
43.96%600
20.00%273
15.38%210
17.07%233
1.54%21
2.05%28
Q7 Traditional concrete
Answered: 1,365 Skipped: 10
TOTAL 1,365
No way!
No
Meh
Ok
Cool
Fantastic!
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
No way!
No
Meh
Ok
Cool
Fantastic!
7 / 76
Downtown Georgetown Parking Garage
Page 47 of 85
6.40%87
7.35%100
7.87%107
29.19%397
24.26%330
24.93%339
Q8 First-floor retail or displays
Answered: 1,360 Skipped: 15
TOTAL 1,360
No way!
No
Meh
Ok
Cool
Fantastic!
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
No way!
No
Meh
Ok
Cool
Fantastic!
8 / 76
Downtown Georgetown Parking Garage
Page 48 of 85
30.64%417
22.70%309
13.30%181
12.56%171
14.92%203
5.88%80
Q9 Panel screens
Answered: 1,361 Skipped: 14
TOTAL 1,361
No way!
No
Meh
Ok
Cool
Fantastic!
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
No way!
No
Meh
Ok
Cool
Fantastic!
9 / 76
Downtown Georgetown Parking Garage
Page 49 of 85
66.72%910
17.52%239
4.40%60
2.86%39
4.33%59
4.18%57
Q10 Modern
Answered: 1,364 Skipped: 11
TOTAL 1,364
No way!
No
Meh
Ok
Cool
Fantastic!
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
No way!
No
Meh
Ok
Cool
Fantastic!
10 / 76
Downtown Georgetown Parking Garage
Page 50 of 85
46.71%638
22.47%307
8.78%120
8.49%116
8.78%120
4.76%65
Q11 Artistic Lighting
Answered: 1,366 Skipped: 9
TOTAL 1,366
No way!
No
Meh
Ok
Cool
Fantastic!
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
No way!
No
Meh
Ok
Cool
Fantastic!
11 / 76
Downtown Georgetown Parking Garage
Page 51 of 85
Q12 Please provide feedback on these possible design elements
Answered: 1,342 Skipped: 33
Landscaping
Public art
(banners,...
Traditional
materials...
Modern
materials...
Green walls or
planters
12 / 76
Downtown Georgetown Parking Garage
Page 52 of 85
4.96%
66
14.88%
198
34.11%
454
46.06%
613
1,331
3.21
32.53%
432
32.53%
432
21.61%
287
13.33%
177
1,328
2.16
3.45%
46
14.84%
198
37.18%
496
44.53%
594
1,334
3.23
43.93%
583
34.59%
459
15.45%
205
6.03%
80
1,327
1.84
28.04%
371
29.02%
384
24.19%
320
18.75%
248
1,323
2.34
14.12%
189
25.17%
337
34.43%
461
26.29%
352
1,339
2.73
Do Not Include Maybe Good Idea Definitely
First-floor
retail or...
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
DO NOT
INCLUDE
MAYBE GOOD
IDEA
DEFINITELY TOTAL WEIGHTED
AVERAGE
Landscaping
Public art (banners, murals, lighting)
Traditional materials (Stone, brick)
Modern materials (glass, exposed steel,
concrete)
Green walls or planters
First-floor retail or displays
13 / 76
Downtown Georgetown Parking Garage
Page 53 of 85
Q13 Share 3-5 words that you would use to describe the design or
appearance you would prefer.
Answered: 1,192 Skipped: 183
#RESPONSES DATE
1 traditional, historic, conservative, brick 10/30/2019 5:53 PM
2 In keeping with the Square 10/29/2019 8:46 PM
3 Fresh and inviting and full of bright lights 10/29/2019 6:22 PM
4 The art design 10/29/2019 3:10 PM
5 Traditional, historic feel 10/29/2019 2:31 PM
6 Homage to early 20th century architecture 10/28/2019 7:59 PM
7 Old, classic, not out of place 10/28/2019 6:23 PM
8 compliment downtown architecture 10/28/2019 3:46 PM
9 Something that reflects Georgetown mission of honoring the past and innovating for the future = art
and landscaping is a good way to do this.
10/28/2019 3:26 PM
10 No garage 10/28/2019 3:07 PM
11 Old town traditional 10/28/2019 2:30 PM
12 Underground 10/28/2019 12:49 PM
13 Classic, classy, timeless 10/28/2019 8:25 AM
14 Modern with a historical consideration.10/28/2019 3:06 AM
15 Something to match what we already have.10/27/2019 9:20 PM
16 fit into downtown 10/27/2019 7:14 PM
17 Blend in with the look of the square.10/27/2019 4:14 PM
18 To match downtown 10/27/2019 3:05 PM
19 Like Georgetown 10/27/2019 2:27 PM
20 Fitting to the historic appearance of downtown. No modern elements.10/27/2019 2:15 PM
21 Most importantly it should fit in with downtown Georgetown 10/27/2019 2:07 PM
22 Blend, Natural, Local, Classic, Stone 10/27/2019 12:53 PM
23 Keep it simple 10/27/2019 12:38 PM
24 Useful, coffee, time limit, customers only.10/27/2019 12:38 PM
25 Complement the Square 10/27/2019 12:32 PM
26 Homogenous, discrete, representative 10/27/2019 12:06 PM
27 Blends, beautiful, local character 10/27/2019 11:59 AM
28 It should blend in with the historic and mid-century architecture that is the mainstay of downtown
Georgetown. A wildly colorful, artsy building would be overwhelming and a steel, concrete or glass
structure would stick out in an unattractive manner. The one showing green landscaping “may”
work but would take a lot to maintain.
10/26/2019 10:26 PM
29 I like the green plant view for aesthetics and environmentally 10/26/2019 3:28 PM
30 unobtrusive, blending, not an eyesore 10/26/2019 2:01 PM
31 Traditional stone brick 10/26/2019 1:48 PM
14 / 76
Downtown Georgetown Parking Garage
Page 54 of 85
32 Nature meets city 10/26/2019 12:25 PM
33 Turn of the century brick/stone 10/26/2019 12:12 PM
34 traditional 10/26/2019 9:26 AM
35 Traditional and nature 10/26/2019 5:39 AM
36 Sustainable, green, fits into surroundings 10/26/2019 2:37 AM
37 Modern clean look no murals.10/26/2019 12:53 AM
38 Classic, compliment current buildings around 10/25/2019 11:40 PM
39 To blend into our beautiful square 10/25/2019 11:22 PM
40 Traditional, green, brick.10/25/2019 11:16 PM
41 Blends in well 10/25/2019 11:13 PM
42 Beautiful natural artistic 10/25/2019 11:03 PM
43 Old School Georgetown 10/25/2019 10:14 PM
44 I prefer that a parking garage not be in this space.10/25/2019 10:02 PM
45 Classic, Clean, hometown 10/25/2019 9:17 PM
46 Historic and traditional 10/25/2019 6:30 PM
47 Preserve old town feeling 10/25/2019 2:35 PM
48 Like the courthouse 10/25/2019 2:21 PM
49 If plants are on building...with our heat may not be a good idea 10/25/2019 2:03 PM
50 Multi purpose include local stone 10/25/2019 1:36 PM
51 match the old buildings 10/25/2019 12:58 PM
52 Compliment existing historical downtown buildings 10/25/2019 12:54 PM
53 Keeping Georgetown Historic 10/25/2019 12:34 PM
54 Needs to blend with downtown architecture 10/25/2019 9:05 AM
55 Match existing downtown architecture 10/25/2019 4:43 AM
56 Classic design that won't age 10/25/2019 3:11 AM
57 Historically sensitive, artistically architectural 10/25/2019 2:16 AM
58 larger; site too small. mall-like.10/25/2019 1:24 AM
59 Modern with a nod to history 10/25/2019 12:33 AM
60 unobtrusive, low, and natural 10/25/2019 12:16 AM
61 Nothing loud or outlandish, Georgetown is a nice town with a great feel 10/24/2019 11:06 PM
62 Green not institutional 10/24/2019 11:00 PM
63 Artistic old town 10/24/2019 10:40 PM
64 Green &/or traditional with retail 10/24/2019 10:02 PM
65 Similar to existing buildings 10/24/2019 9:48 PM
66 It needs to blend in with the historic aspect of downtown 10/24/2019 9:31 PM
67 classic and useful 10/24/2019 9:14 PM
68 Open, inviting, safe, progressive 10/24/2019 9:08 PM
69 Exterior similar to existing buildings 10/24/2019 5:46 PM
70 Brick art retail plants landscaping 10/24/2019 4:32 PM
71 aesthetic, green, appealing 10/24/2019 3:38 PM
72 Historic Georgetown appearance 10/24/2019 10:12 AM
15 / 76
Downtown Georgetown Parking Garage
Page 55 of 85
73 Blends with current Georgetown 10/24/2019 2:16 AM
74 Fit into Georgetown’s style 10/24/2019 1:51 AM
75 old town, quaint, artistic 10/23/2019 10:35 PM
76 NA 10/23/2019 10:24 PM
77 Compliments surrounding buildings 10/23/2019 9:31 PM
78 Traditional to go with the old fashioned feel of the square.10/23/2019 9:27 PM
79 complementary to the Square's character 10/23/2019 9:14 PM
80 consistent with current architecture in the area 10/23/2019 8:49 PM
81 harmonious with the square 10/23/2019 7:33 PM
82 Comply with Historic Guidelines Georgetown 10/23/2019 4:53 PM
83 No tacky painting..,10/23/2019 4:49 PM
84 Similar appearance to the square 10/23/2019 4:35 PM
85 Modern with artistic and green elements 10/23/2019 4:30 PM
86 fit in with traditional downtown architecture 10/23/2019 4:15 PM
87 A design that does not look like a typical parking garage, or stand out, and does not fit with the
surrounding architecture
10/23/2019 4:08 PM
88 Modern, mainstreet, classy, conservative 10/23/2019 2:50 PM
89 Artistic intersting 10/23/2019 3:45 AM
90 Needs to fit in with surrounding businesses 10/23/2019 2:47 AM
91 In keeping with the traditional architecture of the square. Please don't butcher the current beauty!10/22/2019 11:33 PM
92 Fitting the rest of the town 10/22/2019 5:49 PM
93 Consistent with downtown architecture 10/22/2019 2:53 PM
94 historic, artistic, stone & greenery, local art 10/22/2019 1:40 PM
95 Classic with greenery 10/22/2019 1:33 PM
96 Only THREE stories 10/22/2019 1:32 PM
97 Traditional 10/22/2019 1:23 PM
98 Tastetful, Integrates with Georgetown tradition and grace 10/22/2019 12:36 PM
99 Blends with current architecture 10/22/2019 6:07 AM
100 safe, green plants, mural or local art 10/22/2019 6:01 AM
101 Traditional with modern 10/22/2019 2:49 AM
102 Appearance should mesh with downtown 10/22/2019 2:32 AM
103 Classy, must fit with the design of our Square 10/22/2019 2:12 AM
104 Traditional town square 10/22/2019 1:20 AM
105 Must fit the old style of downtown 10/21/2019 11:26 PM
106 Brick traditional with local retail 10/21/2019 11:05 PM
107 big waste of money to obtain 100 more parking spaces 10/21/2019 10:30 PM
108 Beautiful; not out of place 10/21/2019 10:27 PM
109 Simple elegance 10/21/2019 10:10 PM
110 Looks like an attractive building rather than like a parking garage. Plants could look brown and
scraggly. Murals could look gaudy. I know--more than 3-5 words. I'm a rebel!
10/21/2019 10:05 PM
111 Transitional 10/21/2019 9:57 PM
16 / 76
Downtown Georgetown Parking Garage
Page 56 of 85
112 similiar to library 10/21/2019 9:37 PM
113 Match the design and appeal of the square 10/21/2019 9:24 PM
114 N/A 10/21/2019 8:41 PM
115 traditional 10/21/2019 8:38 PM
116 Traditional 10/21/2019 7:45 PM
117 I want something that blends in with the old architecture of downtown, that will help preserve the
historic district feel, while maximizing the use of the area. I am sad to lose the food truck court
area for the festivals.
10/21/2019 7:44 PM
118 Historical like everything downtown 10/21/2019 7:17 PM
119 Compatible, traditional, elegant 10/21/2019 7:04 PM
120 Needs to fit in with the look and feel of the existing square buildings 10/21/2019 7:04 PM
121 Old charm to fit the rest of the downtown ambience 10/21/2019 7:02 PM
122 Rustic looking, modern finishes 10/21/2019 6:47 PM
123 Old town feel 10/21/2019 6:38 PM
124 some murals would be nice 10/21/2019 6:30 PM
125 Not too modern; well lighted; elevators;10/21/2019 3:36 PM
126 Keep downtown flavor 10/21/2019 1:17 PM
127 something that keeps with the old square feel and look 10/21/2019 11:57 AM
128 Flat parking lot elsewhere 10/21/2019 8:35 AM
129 Georgetown history 10/20/2019 11:44 PM
130 Traditional conservitive 10/20/2019 7:22 PM
131 old brick 10/20/2019 4:10 PM
132 do not build 10/20/2019 2:04 PM
133 Traditional Texas 10/20/2019 2:26 AM
134 Reflect existing architecture on the square 10/20/2019 1:59 AM
135 Historic 10/20/2019 1:29 AM
136 COLORFUL, INTERESTING, DIFFERENT WITHOUT BEING SO MODERN 10/20/2019 1:22 AM
137 Design that would compliment current city structures, NOTHING weird/artsy.10/20/2019 12:51 AM
138 Art and murals 10/20/2019 12:13 AM
139 Complement the historical nature of the town 10/19/2019 10:59 PM
140 No modern! Natural brick stone materials to fit current exterior facade of buildings on square 10/19/2019 8:51 PM
141 Ensure low cost for upkeep and reduce initial cost.10/19/2019 7:31 PM
142 Traditional, late 19th Century 10/19/2019 6:58 PM
143 Traditional, old town flavor 10/19/2019 4:51 PM
144 Historical, substantial, not trendy 10/19/2019 4:18 PM
145 First floor retail and restaurant 10/19/2019 3:27 PM
146 Traditional. Tasteful. Classic 10/19/2019 1:11 PM
147 artistic murals and landscaping 10/19/2019 12:27 PM
148 Traditional, fitting with the historic surroundings 10/19/2019 6:25 AM
149 Traditional yet with greenery.10/19/2019 2:29 AM
150 Classy easy functional.10/19/2019 1:52 AM
17 / 76
Downtown Georgetown Parking Garage
Page 57 of 85
151 traditional in keeping with Square 10/19/2019 1:45 AM
152 Stone Building 10/19/2019 12:59 AM
153 Traditional parking garage 10/19/2019 12:55 AM
154 Same as the downtown architecture 10/19/2019 12:50 AM
155 historically consistent with other buildings 10/19/2019 12:48 AM
156 Fit character of the Square !!!!!10/18/2019 11:55 PM
157 Historical 10/18/2019 10:52 PM
158 Traditional Texan 10/18/2019 10:44 PM
159 ok 10/18/2019 10:21 PM
160 matches current downtown architecture 10/18/2019 8:57 PM
161 I like traditional 10/18/2019 8:02 PM
162 traditional brick limestone enclosed no-retail 10/18/2019 7:46 PM
163 traditional design that fits in with the square 10/18/2019 6:58 PM
164 smaller historic style architecture 10/18/2019 6:19 PM
165 Cohesive, consistent, traditional 10/18/2019 6:11 PM
166 fits with downtown parking only 10/18/2019 4:40 PM
167 match or harmonize with architecture of the square (i.e., traditional)10/18/2019 4:06 PM
168 Fits in with Old Town 10/18/2019 3:14 PM
169 Complimentary to downtown square 10/18/2019 2:53 PM
170 LOOKS LIKE TOWN SQUARE!10/18/2019 2:37 PM
171 Fit in with classic architecture of the DT square 10/18/2019 2:35 PM
172 traditional, well-proportioned, dignified 10/18/2019 2:31 PM
173 Something that's muted but add interest. Nothing too bright and glaring 10/18/2019 2:13 PM
174 blends into downtown 10/18/2019 2:11 PM
175 matching architecture of G-town square 10/18/2019 1:59 PM
176 Banners, murals 10/18/2019 1:18 PM
177 blend with square architecture 10/18/2019 1:02 PM
178 Similar to Square Architecture 10/18/2019 1:02 PM
179 No Austin art 10/18/2019 12:59 PM
180 Traditional to fit square 10/18/2019 12:43 PM
181 historically appealing 10/18/2019 12:18 PM
182 Design should reflect the look of the city 10/18/2019 12:10 PM
183 Historic look blend in 10/18/2019 12:09 PM
184 Nada 10/18/2019 11:53 AM
185 Traditional 10/18/2019 11:49 AM
186 Sedate. Traditional unobtrusive 10/18/2019 11:46 AM
187 2 or maybe 3 floors at most 10/18/2019 11:42 AM
188 Fits in but unique and efficient 10/18/2019 2:02 AM
189 Planters 10/18/2019 1:56 AM
190 Glass and brick 10/17/2019 9:36 PM
191 fit in existing community style 10/17/2019 7:45 PM
18 / 76
Downtown Georgetown Parking Garage
Page 58 of 85
192 Unobstrusive, blended in, low profile.10/17/2019 7:06 PM
193 Innovative, functional and positive addition to neighborhood 10/17/2019 7:03 PM
194 traditional with art work 10/17/2019 2:02 PM
195 Traditional to blend in with current historic structures.10/17/2019 1:51 PM
196 Functional-open air 10/17/2019 9:09 AM
197 I liked the steel mesh and plantings. A little art space might be OK.10/17/2019 5:28 AM
198 Whole thing bad idea.10/17/2019 4:41 AM
199 Eye catching and modern 10/17/2019 4:29 AM
200 It should match the historic look of Georgetown 10/17/2019 4:18 AM
201 Traditional with landscaping and art 10/17/2019 4:02 AM
202 Modern but not crazy - let’s go with classy 10/17/2019 3:16 AM
203 Coordinate with current downtown design and feel 10/17/2019 3:02 AM
204 Retail on bottom, traditional brick 10/17/2019 2:09 AM
205 Blend in, feel safe, economic maintenance 10/16/2019 11:48 PM
206 Fits with buildings on square 10/16/2019 11:39 PM
207 Historic Appearance Like Surroundings 10/16/2019 9:24 PM
208 it's a parking garage, make it look like one so not confuse us or waste money.10/16/2019 8:50 PM
209 It shouldn't stand out like a "sore thumb"10/16/2019 8:48 PM
210 Needs to fit downtown area 10/16/2019 8:06 PM
211 Colorful yet traditional 10/16/2019 7:31 PM
212 Blend in with it's surroundings 10/16/2019 6:30 PM
213 Similar to architecture on square 10/16/2019 6:16 PM
214 Traditional and Modern 10/16/2019 6:04 PM
215 MUST fit in with downtown.10/16/2019 5:48 PM
216 Modern with murals 10/16/2019 5:32 PM
217 Blend in 10/16/2019 5:21 PM
218 Melds with currant architecture 10/16/2019 5:12 PM
219 without continual maintenance!10/16/2019 5:11 PM
220 Traditional limestone construction 10/16/2019 5:08 PM
221 limestone to match other buildings on the Square 10/16/2019 4:17 PM
222 It needs to blend with the existing feel of downtown which is quaint, picturesque, not modern in the
least !
10/16/2019 4:12 PM
223 not Austin weird 10/16/2019 4:02 PM
224 Keep the small ton square feel 10/16/2019 3:35 PM
225 no retail, increases height 10/16/2019 3:34 PM
226 Must fit in with the square ARCHITECTURE 10/16/2019 3:10 PM
227 Stylish tasteful modern “Georgetownistic”10/16/2019 3:05 PM
228 very traditional or historical 10/16/2019 2:39 PM
229 should not be significantly different from architecture on square 10/16/2019 2:10 PM
230 Historic 10/16/2019 2:09 PM
19 / 76
Downtown Georgetown Parking Garage
Page 59 of 85
231 I would prefer a building that isn’t an eye sore and looks ugly. Need to fit into architecture for the
square.
10/16/2019 2:04 PM
232 traditional pleasing appearance 10/16/2019 1:58 PM
233 It must blend in.10/16/2019 1:57 PM
234 least expensive to build and maintain 10/16/2019 1:52 PM
235 victorian texas 10/16/2019 1:47 PM
236 Must blend with current arcitecture 10/16/2019 1:34 PM
237 Complimentary to current architecture 10/16/2019 1:32 PM
238 Keep the design that reflects older buildings 10/16/2019 1:26 PM
239 Keep the appearance of old town.10/16/2019 12:57 PM
240 Match it to the courthouse 10/16/2019 12:42 PM
241 maintain traditional Gtwn style 10/16/2019 12:40 PM
242 Glass and exposed steel 10/16/2019 12:31 PM
243 Fit in with downtown 10/16/2019 12:29 PM
244 Match existing architecture 10/16/2019 12:27 PM
245 Low profile, fitting with old town square look. After all we have the most beautiful town square in
the US, let's not ruin it
10/16/2019 12:21 PM
246 Traditional Georgetown square design 10/16/2019 12:17 PM
247 Blends with Georgetown’s square.10/16/2019 11:59 AM
248 Traditional , multi-story , office-like 10/16/2019 11:57 AM
249 Keep design calm to fit in downtown architecture 10/16/2019 11:51 AM
250 Simple and low cost 10/16/2019 11:43 AM
251 Modern and untraditional 10/16/2019 11:23 AM
252 Full Facade 10/16/2019 11:02 AM
253 Good architecture 10/16/2019 2:35 AM
254 Traditional to blend in 10/16/2019 12:09 AM
255 Not overwhelming the other buildings/setting 10/15/2019 10:43 PM
256 Akin to Old Town - reflect the City Downtown Square 10/15/2019 8:38 PM
257 Multi-purpose Small-town 10/15/2019 8:12 PM
258 A beautiful and bright place.10/15/2019 8:01 PM
259 Brick with glass 10/15/2019 7:49 PM
260 Simple 10/15/2019 7:18 PM
261 Antique design with color or paintings 10/15/2019 7:06 PM
262 compatible with downtown structures 10/15/2019 4:52 PM
263 unobtrusive, blends in 10/15/2019 2:43 PM
264 consistent with Old Town 10/15/2019 12:54 PM
265 Safe- I have 2 friends raped in parking garages 10/15/2019 1:27 AM
266 Fits in with the area 10/14/2019 10:42 PM
267 modern, artistic but compliant with standard guidelines 10/14/2019 8:39 PM
268 fit in with the existing 10/14/2019 6:16 PM
269 Old town compatible 10/14/2019 5:49 PM
20 / 76
Downtown Georgetown Parking Garage
Page 60 of 85
270 Old Town style, sustainable, underground 10/14/2019 4:47 PM
271 make it look Old Town 10/14/2019 3:35 PM
272 “Down home”, natural—a part of the city 10/14/2019 2:56 PM
273 Something that would ascetically fit 10/14/2019 12:56 PM
274 In keeping with historic theme of downtown please.10/14/2019 10:40 AM
275 Traditional and classy 10/14/2019 2:28 AM
276 Compliment downtown Charm 10/14/2019 1:39 AM
277 Blends in with the Square.10/14/2019 12:59 AM
278 Blending in 10/14/2019 12:38 AM
279 Traditional, old school, victorian 10/13/2019 11:58 PM
280 Keep it traditional design 10/13/2019 11:22 PM
281 Historically inspired 10/13/2019 9:45 PM
282 Fits with existing architecture 10/13/2019 8:19 PM
283 For with current architecture 10/13/2019 7:36 PM
284 lots of greenery 10/13/2019 5:18 PM
285 Traditional compatible with historical architecture on Square 10/13/2019 3:21 PM
286 New school from old architecture 10/13/2019 3:12 PM
287 Shops on main floor, parking above.10/13/2019 12:41 PM
288 Traditional brick to match character of downtown 10/13/2019 12:16 PM
289 fit in with Historic Downtown - easily maintained 10/13/2019 12:32 AM
290 big book panels, greenery 10/12/2019 10:03 PM
291 Match the Square 10/12/2019 7:42 PM
292 In keeping with downtown architecture 10/12/2019 6:24 PM
293 Traditional 10/12/2019 4:53 PM
294 Relaxing, Pleasing, Welcome 10/12/2019 4:11 PM
295 design to blend with downtown 10/12/2019 11:36 AM
296 Georgetown traditional, stone, historic 10/12/2019 4:24 AM
297 Lots of trees - even in top!10/12/2019 2:22 AM
298 Doesn't look like a parkimg garage 10/12/2019 1:01 AM
299 Blends in with the area 10/12/2019 12:47 AM
300 Doesn’t detract from Old Town charm 10/12/2019 12:03 AM
301 Fits in with downtown 10/11/2019 11:53 PM
302 Low expense with eye appeal 10/11/2019 11:39 PM
303 Old Georgetown 10/11/2019 11:26 PM
304 Traditional, uncommon, architecturally complementary 10/11/2019 11:23 PM
305 Fits in with the Square 10/11/2019 10:47 PM
306 Functional, interesting, clean 10/11/2019 10:35 PM
307 Smaller, too large for area 10/11/2019 10:24 PM
308 Shouldn’t be too tall or obstruct the view of downtown. It should use traditional materials that are
consistent with the square. It should disrupt the integrity of downtown as little as possible
10/11/2019 10:16 PM
21 / 76
Downtown Georgetown Parking Garage
Page 61 of 85
309 needs to compliment the look, feel, vibe of downtown Georgetown, retail will tie it in and draw
people to that block (and beyond!) would like people to be surprised that it is a public garage
10/11/2019 10:08 PM
310 Old town feel 10/11/2019 10:00 PM
311 No more than a 2 story garage that fits in with local historical architecture.10/11/2019 9:56 PM
312 Something to where it promotes safety; dark and hidden isn't safe; open, airy, and visible is safer 10/11/2019 9:53 PM
313 Traditional classic appealing 10/11/2019 9:43 PM
314 Something that truly reflects the historical aspects of Georgetown. Which is NOT a 4-story
structure.
10/11/2019 9:43 PM
315 dignified; not garish 10/11/2019 9:29 PM
316 community-engaged, artistic, natural 10/11/2019 8:59 PM
317 Unobtrusive 10/11/2019 8:52 PM
318 Traditional, old, blends in 10/11/2019 8:26 PM
319 Traditional 1900 design 10/11/2019 3:34 PM
320 Something with character to match the town 10/11/2019 3:20 PM
321 Fit within the existing design of downtown 10/11/2019 2:36 PM
322 fit in with current downtown 10/11/2019 2:12 PM
323 Keep that Historic look 10/11/2019 2:07 PM
324 Mixed-use and environmentally friendly 10/11/2019 1:59 PM
325 Make it look like old town charm 10/11/2019 1:41 PM
326 Blending, simple, plants, artistic 10/11/2019 1:33 PM
327 complements library across the street.10/11/2019 1:06 PM
328 Keep in sync with the traditional designs of the square.10/11/2019 11:40 AM
329 Similar materials and design of old DTSquare 10/10/2019 11:06 PM
330 Traditional to match downtown 10/10/2019 10:11 PM
331 Pleasing, in keeping, attractive 10/10/2019 8:36 PM
332 Blend with downtown historic Georgetown 10/10/2019 8:06 PM
333 Non obtrusive. Blending seamlessly with historic.10/10/2019 8:03 PM
334 something that fits in with the neighborhood 10/10/2019 6:25 PM
335 no art 10/10/2019 5:09 PM
336 Clean lines steel low maintenance 10/10/2019 4:51 PM
337 Limestone is always a great option. Art Deco or a classic style to match square architecture.10/10/2019 4:06 PM
338 Anything other than a traditional concrete garage. Something more along the aesthetic of
Georgetown itself.
10/10/2019 2:38 PM
339 Traditional. Keep the hometown feel. If you want artsy weird, go to tent/sanctuary city where we
just moved from.
10/10/2019 2:33 PM
340 New, Artsy, Safe 10/10/2019 2:25 PM
341 Consistent with downtown architecture 10/10/2019 1:47 PM
342 Traditional look to match square, shops, hopefully free, easy traffic access 10/10/2019 1:34 PM
343 We would like it to be at another location.10/10/2019 1:16 PM
344 Complement surrounding architecture 10/10/2019 6:05 AM
345 Self sustaining energy efficient building 10/10/2019 1:25 AM
346 Traditional brick/stone 10/10/2019 12:47 AM
22 / 76
Downtown Georgetown Parking Garage
Page 62 of 85
347 places for local art 10/9/2019 9:46 PM
348 Native stone - not brick 10/9/2019 9:14 PM
349 Traditional square with artistic flare.10/9/2019 7:38 PM
350 Modern yet rugged 10/9/2019 7:32 PM
351 Reflect DT bldgs’ charm/style 10/9/2019 7:29 PM
352 similiar to the Tamiro Bldg in Gtwn 10/9/2019 6:33 PM
353 Tons of art 10/9/2019 5:31 PM
354 Appropriate, Fits with nearby buildings, Creative, Safe, Welcoming,10/9/2019 5:18 PM
355 Don't Build; Not Needed!10/9/2019 4:54 PM
356 minimally jarring compared to historic buildings 10/9/2019 4:51 PM
357 Fits Downtown architecture/ambience 10/9/2019 4:43 PM
358 Modern, curb-appeal, user-centric.10/9/2019 4:41 PM
359 use local artists. try southwestern artists 10/9/2019 4:20 PM
360 Further from square 10/9/2019 3:12 PM
361 Traditional fits Gtown better than modern.10/9/2019 3:12 PM
362 basic, charming, no retail on ground floor(wasted space)10/9/2019 2:45 PM
363 functional (shops) & greenery 10/9/2019 2:35 PM
364 Environmentally friendly, beautiful, plants, simple 10/9/2019 2:08 PM
365 sustainable, electric plug-ins, artistic, historical 10/9/2019 2:07 PM
366 fit into old town vibe 10/9/2019 2:07 PM
367 Must match downtown buildings 10/9/2019 2:02 PM
368 Natural, unpretentious, homey 10/9/2019 1:42 PM
369 Garage must match the downtown area while providing additional small business opportunities.10/9/2019 1:27 PM
370 vibrant lively artistic 10/9/2019 1:21 PM
371 Don’t build it at all 10/9/2019 11:53 AM
372 Two story or less 10/9/2019 11:50 AM
373 Same as surroundings 10/9/2019 11:46 AM
374 Brick with planters 10/9/2019 3:38 AM
375 Natural, minimal, architecturally appropriate 10/9/2019 2:27 AM
376 Whoever proposed all these crazy ideas must be from CA.10/9/2019 12:34 AM
377 Go with downtown architecture 10/8/2019 11:52 PM
378 Keep it historic 10/8/2019 10:54 PM
379 Contemporary, functional, non-threatening to old town folks,10/8/2019 10:40 PM
380 Maintain historical look of town 10/8/2019 10:38 PM
381 Quit Austin our GT.10/8/2019 7:01 PM
382 I would prefer to see something that speaks to Georgetown's atheistic and is still modern/
incorporates idea synonymous with campus life. The inclusion of public art (and local art) is a must
have idea, because it can easily capture the Georgetown/Southwestern elements, and because it
supports local artists.
10/8/2019 6:52 PM
383 Consistent with historic downtown structures 10/8/2019 6:51 PM
384 Incorporating retail and foliage; modern traditional blend 10/8/2019 5:57 PM
385 Respect Old Town 10/8/2019 5:34 PM
23 / 76
Downtown Georgetown Parking Garage
Page 63 of 85
386 fits 10/8/2019 5:30 PM
387 matching, Square-like, appropriate, solid, sturdy 10/8/2019 5:11 PM
388 Classic clean heritage 10/8/2019 5:10 PM
389 Brick and/or an historic feel to fit with downtown.10/8/2019 4:11 PM
390 Please design the parking garage to correspond with the existing design of the buildings on the
square. The goal should be for it to look like it has always been there.
10/8/2019 3:52 PM
391 Traditional, Simple, Plants 10/8/2019 3:38 PM
392 eco-friendly, fits in with surroundings, aesthetically pleasing 10/8/2019 3:38 PM
393 Blending with town square seamlessly 10/8/2019 2:57 PM
394 feels like home 10/8/2019 2:56 PM
395 Try to match the existing architecture of the square.10/8/2019 2:40 PM
396 Old Town Aesthetic!10/8/2019 2:26 PM
397 artistic greenery appropriate size 10/8/2019 2:00 PM
398 Something to blend in with downtown, but also be pretty to look at 10/8/2019 1:53 PM
399 Something that matches the style of Georgetown NOT Austin 10/8/2019 1:47 PM
400 Tasteful contemporary retail a bit creative 10/8/2019 1:39 PM
401 Interesting and colorful 10/8/2019 1:33 PM
402 Fits with the downtown facade 10/8/2019 1:29 PM
403 matching downtown area 10/8/2019 1:22 PM
404 Historic yet Modern, Creative 10/8/2019 1:15 PM
405 Fits in with other structures.10/8/2019 12:56 PM
406 classic Georgetown square 10/8/2019 12:56 PM
407 Blending with downtown 10/8/2019 12:43 PM
408 Contemporary traditional 10/8/2019 12:35 PM
409 Brick or stone garage 10/8/2019 11:44 AM
410 traditional exposed ramps (see thru), not fully enclosed.10/8/2019 3:01 AM
411 Historic architectural elements 10/8/2019 2:34 AM
412 Old, to compliment OldTown 10/8/2019 2:24 AM
413 Early Modern Rooted w/Georgetown Revivalist 10/8/2019 1:44 AM
414 No stores. Focus on getting the most parking space. flows with surrounding area 10/8/2019 1:02 AM
415 Historical, blending, brick & stone, architecturally pleasing 10/8/2019 12:35 AM
416 not something that would be a fad and outdated soon 10/8/2019 12:04 AM
417 Design that compliments the buildings on the square 10/7/2019 11:51 PM
418 Mirror surrounding structures 10/7/2019 11:43 PM
419 a design that blends in but with a slight modern edge 10/7/2019 11:21 PM
420 Build outside of Old town 10/7/2019 10:57 PM
421 Historic looking 10/7/2019 10:17 PM
422 To fit with downtown 10/7/2019 10:01 PM
423 Antique but new 10/7/2019 9:55 PM
424 What fits in with the character of Georgetown, Duh!!10/7/2019 9:35 PM
425 Functional, not gaudy 10/7/2019 9:00 PM
24 / 76
Downtown Georgetown Parking Garage
Page 64 of 85
426 practical, safe w conservation in mind 10/7/2019 8:47 PM
427 First floor retail with garage 10/7/2019 8:30 PM
428 compatible with existing architecture on square 10/7/2019 8:14 PM
429 Traditional, brick and mortar with stone 10/7/2019 8:10 PM
430 Traditional brick blends in with other close buy buildings. I don’t think a parking garage should be
a artistic center point to “ old downtown square” that Georgetown is known for.
10/7/2019 8:07 PM
431 classic, limestone, undistracting 10/7/2019 7:29 PM
432 Traditional with character that blends with square!10/7/2019 7:18 PM
433 Blend in with current city design 10/7/2019 7:17 PM
434 Wrong location 10/7/2019 7:16 PM
435 design to fit existing neighborhood 10/7/2019 7:10 PM
436 traditional low profile 10/7/2019 6:42 PM
437 Tranquility, Peace, Community 10/7/2019 6:39 PM
438 Vintage to match the square 10/7/2019 5:14 PM
439 Blending, historic, landscaped, pedestrian, convenient 10/7/2019 4:58 PM
440 This garage needs to blend In with our beautiful square. No modern or over the top nonsense
please!
10/7/2019 4:32 PM
441 Three stories maximum. Small scale.10/7/2019 4:31 PM
442 Good fit with town square architecture 10/7/2019 4:09 PM
443 historic feel to match rest of downtown 10/7/2019 4:08 PM
444 Old Town feel.. Not sure I really liked any of them.10/7/2019 3:42 PM
445 Fitting with existing historic buildings.10/7/2019 3:29 PM
446 match the Courhouse 10/7/2019 2:44 PM
447 Traditional with retail shops street level 10/7/2019 2:27 PM
448 Traditional to tie into feel of square 10/7/2019 1:59 PM
449 fits with downtown 10/7/2019 1:53 PM
450 Something that fits the square & culture of Georgetown. None of these do.10/7/2019 1:48 PM
451 traditional to fit the historic square 10/7/2019 1:39 PM
452 Matches the overall downtown Georgetown 10/7/2019 1:39 PM
453 Semi-modern, public space 10/7/2019 1:27 PM
454 Blends with downtown architecture 10/7/2019 1:25 PM
455 Traditional, historic feel, Georgetown feel.10/7/2019 12:33 PM
456 match square aesthetic, environmentally conscious 10/7/2019 11:53 AM
457 Retail, lights, art, greenery, new elements 10/7/2019 11:48 AM
458 Must match Square architecturally 10/7/2019 11:41 AM
459 Should fit into square not stand out 10/7/2019 9:38 AM
460 Traditional with modern touch 10/7/2019 7:49 AM
461 Same as historic GT but at opposite end of Main or Monument parking lot 10/7/2019 6:23 AM
462 A more traditional look in keeping with the historic buildings around the square.10/7/2019 5:21 AM
463 Make it cost effective 10/7/2019 2:01 AM
464 Retail ground level. More traditional look.10/7/2019 1:51 AM
25 / 76
Downtown Georgetown Parking Garage
Page 65 of 85
465 Something that matches our historic buildings 10/7/2019 1:48 AM
466 Fits with courthouse, old buildings 10/7/2019 1:26 AM
467 Fits with old town feel 10/7/2019 1:19 AM
468 To blend in appropriately with surrounding historic area. Not garish or too modern 10/7/2019 1:12 AM
469 Historical 10/7/2019 12:46 AM
470 Fits the flow of the current georgetown and historical buildings while being green and community
centered with art
10/7/2019 12:31 AM
471 Nothing modern, won’t fit in downtown 10/7/2019 12:24 AM
472 Unique to Georgetown 10/7/2019 12:22 AM
473 Modern take on classic design 10/6/2019 11:40 PM
474 Adds value to the environment 10/6/2019 10:35 PM
475 Blend with old town theme 10/6/2019 10:15 PM
476 matching current acritecture 10/6/2019 10:13 PM
477 Something that blends in with the Old Downtown architecture 10/6/2019 10:00 PM
478 Native plants, vines= life, vitality 10/6/2019 10:00 PM
479 something softer and lighter to blend to our history 10/6/2019 9:58 PM
480 Traditional Georgetown vibe 10/6/2019 9:58 PM
481 Be bold!10/6/2019 8:49 PM
482 Fit in with Old Town 10/6/2019 8:45 PM
483 Old Town feel and charming 10/6/2019 8:38 PM
484 Match the feel of Georgetown square 10/6/2019 8:22 PM
485 Village facade lampposts lit panels 10/6/2019 8:22 PM
486 More traditional brick and retail 10/6/2019 8:18 PM
487 Old historical look 10/6/2019 8:04 PM
488 Fits w/ stores on the Square 10/6/2019 7:51 PM
489 Traditional classic charm 10/6/2019 7:10 PM
490 Make safe for the public/prevent vagrants 10/6/2019 7:08 PM
491 Traditional old town compatible 10/6/2019 7:00 PM
492 Old Town Georgetown Historic 10/6/2019 6:58 PM
493 Match courthouse architecture 10/6/2019 6:13 PM
494 it's a parking garage 10/6/2019 5:35 PM
495 Traditional old town 10/6/2019 5:24 PM
496 None. Stop building where are your morals?10/6/2019 5:15 PM
497 Stone clean small 10/6/2019 4:57 PM
498 Maintain downtown historic 3 story 10/6/2019 4:47 PM
499 No 10/6/2019 4:45 PM
500 Stores below for more income.10/6/2019 4:42 PM
501 Traditional, upscale, classic 10/6/2019 4:35 PM
502 Fit with current building styles & materials 10/6/2019 4:17 PM
503 Artistic and classy 10/6/2019 4:09 PM
504 Modern but fitting to downtown 10/6/2019 3:42 PM
26 / 76
Downtown Georgetown Parking Garage
Page 66 of 85
505 Similar to downtown buildings 10/6/2019 3:16 PM
506 Matching other commercial buildings downtown 10/6/2019 3:15 PM
507 Match to the character of the buildings on the square 10/6/2019 3:02 PM
508 not too crazy 10/6/2019 2:52 PM
509 Blend into neighborhood 10/6/2019 2:23 PM
510 Traditional old town feel....10/6/2019 2:19 PM
511 Old town design 10/6/2019 2:05 PM
512 Keep with the historical look of the neighborhood 10/6/2019 2:01 PM
513 Non obtrusive 10/6/2019 2:00 PM
514 Old town historic feel 10/6/2019 1:58 PM
515 Traditional to blen in with historical architecture of town.10/6/2019 1:48 PM
516 matches other downtown buildings 10/6/2019 1:40 PM
517 Traditional, matches downtown 10/6/2019 1:39 PM
518 Something that fits into GEORGETOWN and its me higher than the County Court house.10/6/2019 1:20 PM
519 Artsy. Keeps with town's tradition.10/6/2019 1:14 PM
520 Blend with the existing downtown 10/6/2019 1:11 PM
521 Blend with existing city 10/6/2019 12:45 PM
522 Traditional concrete 10/6/2019 12:41 PM
523 Natural fit, neutral colors, functional 10/6/2019 12:24 PM
524 Like old town square design 10/6/2019 12:22 PM
525 Blends with environment.10/6/2019 12:07 PM
526 Do not build it there 10/6/2019 11:53 AM
527 MATCH CURRENT ARCHITECTURE.10/6/2019 11:45 AM
528 Historical design 10/6/2019 11:43 AM
529 In line with CURRENT character of Old Town 10/6/2019 11:24 AM
530 traditional to fit downtown styles 10/6/2019 11:23 AM
531 Should blend in with the surrounding buildings around the square.10/6/2019 10:35 AM
532 Traditional in keeping with downtown 10/6/2019 5:28 AM
533 Something that fits in with the surrounding architecture 10/6/2019 4:37 AM
534 None. Start over.10/6/2019 4:18 AM
535 Incorporate the current style of GTW Sq 10/6/2019 4:06 AM
536 Stay traditional to the Older Georgetown Look.10/6/2019 3:32 AM
537 Open concept and one that fits in with the old downtown structures 10/6/2019 3:31 AM
538 Keep with the classic look of downtown 10/6/2019 3:14 AM
539 Match old downtown buildings 10/6/2019 3:05 AM
540 NO. NO. NO. 10/6/2019 3:02 AM
541 Cost effective Tax payers should not pay for anything over the basics.10/6/2019 2:54 AM
542 Proud City view 10/6/2019 2:35 AM
543 Does not make me puke 10/6/2019 2:31 AM
544 Traditional old town motif 10/6/2019 2:27 AM
545 These are all horrible and should not be in the downtown area.10/6/2019 2:18 AM
27 / 76
Downtown Georgetown Parking Garage
Page 67 of 85
546 Old town feel like Georgetown 10/6/2019 2:12 AM
547 Unique classic beautiful 10/6/2019 2:01 AM
548 Traditional with planters/greenery.10/6/2019 1:55 AM
549 Traditional that would compliment the surrounding buildings.10/6/2019 1:53 AM
550 Match Look of Georgetown 10/6/2019 1:48 AM
551 Red brick 10/6/2019 1:47 AM
552 Traditional, classy, Georgetown...not AUSTIN-Tacious!10/6/2019 1:42 AM
553 I like natural beauty. We really don’t want a parking garage to overtake everything else around it
though. Art should be included but in subtle ways maybe. With the big demand for retail space it
might not be a bad idea. Is there anyway we can make this produce energy like solar so it’s not
just another concrete structure.
10/6/2019 1:41 AM
554 Complement surrounding neighborhoods 10/6/2019 1:27 AM
555 Not modern more traditional 10/6/2019 1:26 AM
556 Brick limestone concrete steel 10/6/2019 1:24 AM
557 Design to compliment downtown style 10/6/2019 1:16 AM
558 Blend with existing buildings 10/6/2019 12:43 AM
559 Happy to get it built 10/6/2019 12:30 AM
560 Fit in with the other buildings in downtown 10/6/2019 12:20 AM
561 Blends in with Old Town/ Square buildings 10/6/2019 12:06 AM
562 Fit in with downtown decor already there 10/5/2019 11:46 PM
563 fits with existing buildings 10/5/2019 11:42 PM
564 Need to blend with our beautiful town square area 10/5/2019 11:41 PM
565 I like brick.10/5/2019 11:30 PM
566 No tower here.10/5/2019 11:27 PM
567 consistent with downtown 10/5/2019 11:17 PM
568 Design that stands the test of time. NOT like the atrocious post WWII housing on Williams Drive!
SO UGLY!!
10/5/2019 11:17 PM
569 Traditional, fitting in with downtown 10/5/2019 11:10 PM
570 I would prefer NO RAMP!10/5/2019 11:06 PM
571 Must fit the historic square-10/5/2019 11:04 PM
572 Something simple and safe for women going in alone 10/5/2019 11:03 PM
573 Match architecture of older buildings on Square 10/5/2019 11:02 PM
574 Keep Georgetown, Texas and not Austin, Texas 10/5/2019 10:59 PM
575 Modern twist old style texas 10/5/2019 10:56 PM
576 Tasteful, keeping with Square’s appearance, not modern to extent of wild & crazy!10/5/2019 10:47 PM
577 Don’t clash with the existing area 10/5/2019 10:38 PM
578 Similar to buildings on square 10/5/2019 10:32 PM
579 Professional Looking with grey stone and brick.10/5/2019 10:30 PM
580 Something to match the Square 10/5/2019 10:12 PM
581 Modern, colorful, artistic 10/5/2019 10:11 PM
582 I would rather prefer no parking lot. Georgetown doesn't need one, stop changing things 10/5/2019 10:09 PM
583 Match the existing historical building 10/5/2019 10:09 PM
28 / 76
Downtown Georgetown Parking Garage
Page 68 of 85
584 Artistic, but classy 10/5/2019 10:09 PM
585 Not garish, blend in 10/5/2019 10:00 PM
586 Nothing modern for a historic area-does not belong 10/5/2019 9:59 PM
587 Traditional 10/5/2019 9:58 PM
588 Love the green walls and planters with the retail space below.10/5/2019 9:54 PM
589 Traditional, historic style 10/5/2019 9:53 PM
590 Use of land 10/5/2019 9:50 PM
591 Artistic, retail on bottom 10/5/2019 9:49 PM
592 traditional, matching Georgetown square architecture 10/5/2019 9:46 PM
593 Some are awful and don’t fit architecture of Georgetown at all 10/5/2019 9:45 PM
594 Historical replica to fit in.10/5/2019 9:42 PM
595 Traditional 10/5/2019 9:37 PM
596 Historic building with losts of vegetation 10/5/2019 9:33 PM
597 Fit historic downtown design!10/5/2019 9:29 PM
598 Historical facade 10/5/2019 9:26 PM
599 Classic historical, matching with surroundings 10/5/2019 9:15 PM
600 Please keep in line with our historic downtown 10/5/2019 9:15 PM
601 design diversity for civic vibrancy 10/5/2019 9:12 PM
602 Landscaping/greenery is important 10/5/2019 9:00 PM
603 Fits downtown architecture, aesthetically pleasing 10/5/2019 8:53 PM
604 Look traditional like the square 10/5/2019 8:44 PM
605 Makes you think 10/5/2019 8:37 PM
606 One that blends in with the historic look of Georgetown 10/5/2019 8:01 PM
607 Artsy, colorful, western, cattle drive, history 10/5/2019 7:47 PM
608 Traditional 10/5/2019 7:41 PM
609 Traditional, stores, murals on inside!10/5/2019 7:36 PM
610 traditional with art and landscaping 10/5/2019 7:20 PM
611 Match rest of Georgetown 10/5/2019 7:14 PM
612 Modern, industrial, unique, plants 10/5/2019 7:06 PM
613 Design appropriate to surrounding building & culture of the G’t Square .10/5/2019 7:01 PM
614 Blend with historic setting 10/5/2019 6:16 PM
615 Historic 10/5/2019 5:59 PM
616 Georgetown traditional for Sure!10/5/2019 5:47 PM
617 Modern but incorporating Central Texas 10/5/2019 5:28 PM
618 fit the neighborhood history 10/5/2019 5:05 PM
619 Small historic downtown 10/5/2019 5:01 PM
620 Traditional to match downtown 10/5/2019 4:44 PM
621 retail, stone, glass 10/5/2019 4:35 PM
622 No 40 ft. Tower!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!10/5/2019 4:30 PM
623 Complements existing GT facades 10/5/2019 4:21 PM
624 Beautiful addition to the city 10/5/2019 3:59 PM
29 / 76
Downtown Georgetown Parking Garage
Page 69 of 85
625 Please dont build fake facades 10/5/2019 3:25 PM
626 Historic 10/5/2019 3:14 PM
627 Traditional building that blends in with the old architecture of Georgetown.10/5/2019 3:08 PM
628 Please keep it within the look of the old town and most beautiful square! Don’t add modern!10/5/2019 3:04 PM
629 2story only 10/5/2019 3:00 PM
630 We need something that will fit in with the architecture on the square, not some new modern,
funky or weird building that will take away from the charm of the square
10/5/2019 2:44 PM
631 Simple traditional, nothing outlandish 10/5/2019 2:43 PM
632 Invites people to park 10/5/2019 2:36 PM
633 something that fits into the historic district 10/5/2019 1:46 PM
634 brick, cohesive, multipurpose 10/5/2019 1:33 PM
635 Please try to keep something that melds with the existing downtown architecture. No more
California tacky soulless modern
10/5/2019 1:30 PM
636 I would prefer to keep Georgetown the way it is. We have our own identity and do not need to take
those on of Austin.
10/5/2019 1:24 PM
637 Must look historic and original!!!10/5/2019 1:09 PM
638 Graffiti resistant, simple style 10/5/2019 12:56 PM
639 Historic, many spaces, match downtown 10/5/2019 12:55 PM
640 Historical, match downtown architecture 10/5/2019 12:54 PM
641 Don’t make GT Austin!10/5/2019 12:37 PM
642 Historic, clean, simple 10/5/2019 12:26 PM
643 Traditional, historical 10/5/2019 12:26 PM
644 Classic 10/5/2019 12:25 PM
645 Cohesive with the rest of square 10/5/2019 12:03 PM
646 Blend with rest of downtown square 10/5/2019 11:46 AM
647 Cultural, historic, don’t ruin this city 10/5/2019 11:11 AM
648 Traditional like downtown 10/5/2019 8:12 AM
649 Functional, representative of the town, green 10/5/2019 6:03 AM
650 The Facade has a good look 10/5/2019 5:12 AM
651 Historical, low maintenance, multi-functional 10/5/2019 4:53 AM
652 Blend with nearby architecture.10/5/2019 4:47 AM
653 Visually compatible with the Square.10/5/2019 4:45 AM
654 Fuck Steve Fought 10/5/2019 4:09 AM
655 Traditional with brick similar to the public library 10/5/2019 4:09 AM
656 Mural and Art Work are my favorites.10/5/2019 4:08 AM
657 Should match downtown 10/5/2019 3:45 AM
658 Fit into the design of our town of today.10/5/2019 3:27 AM
659 Appropriate, neighborhood, scale, blends in, cost conscious 10/5/2019 3:25 AM
660 Artful eclectic complimenting historic square 10/5/2019 3:06 AM
661 Make it look like an office building not a garage.10/5/2019 3:02 AM
662 Match surrounding architecture and include those features into the overall look 10/5/2019 2:56 AM
663 artistic and blending in with the city 10/5/2019 2:46 AM
30 / 76
Downtown Georgetown Parking Garage
Page 70 of 85
664 georgetown artistic design with murals 10/5/2019 2:32 AM
665 Traditional, practical, unique, attractive, updated 10/5/2019 2:05 AM
666 fit into the character of area!10/5/2019 2:04 AM
667 Traditional, classic and blending with existing downtown architecture.10/5/2019 1:58 AM
668 Traditional but forward looking 10/5/2019 1:49 AM
669 Traditional historical exemplary complementary non-heinous 10/5/2019 1:46 AM
670 Traditional standard ok 10/5/2019 1:44 AM
671 historic, open, traditional, airy, retail 10/5/2019 1:40 AM
672 Traditional to fit in with the square 10/5/2019 1:37 AM
673 Brick with cupolas 10/5/2019 1:37 AM
674 First floor retail looks like a brick or concrete exterior 10/5/2019 1:32 AM
675 something with art & cool lighting at night 10/5/2019 1:30 AM
676 Blend in the square 10/5/2019 1:27 AM
677 blend with character of Square 10/5/2019 1:22 AM
678 not modern 10/5/2019 1:20 AM
679 Subtle & good security 10/5/2019 1:08 AM
680 Longevity not trendy 10/5/2019 1:08 AM
681 Traditional brick or stone.10/5/2019 1:08 AM
682 I would prefer that the City not build a garage in this location right across from the new event
center. It certainly appears to be a project paid for with public money to benefit a private business.
10/5/2019 1:02 AM
683 Traditional Georgetown. Definitely NOT AUSTINLIKE!!!10/5/2019 12:55 AM
684 Convenient parking for a business 10/5/2019 12:49 AM
685 Hometown, historic feel 10/5/2019 12:27 AM
686 Brick, neat, clean, square 10/5/2019 12:24 AM
687 Aligns with aesthetic of Georgetown 10/5/2019 12:13 AM
688 something to grow into, nothing old fashion 10/5/2019 12:12 AM
689 blend in with downtown 10/4/2019 11:54 PM
690 Garage not art or plants - want zero maintenance 10/4/2019 11:51 PM
691 current,natural, colorful 10/4/2019 11:51 PM
692 Georgetownish 10/4/2019 11:47 PM
693 goes with the square architecture 10/4/2019 11:40 PM
694 Avoid austere appearance 10/4/2019 11:32 PM
695 Modern 10/4/2019 11:29 PM
696 Antique, rustic, historic 10/4/2019 11:28 PM
697 Original, fun, personality, colorful 10/4/2019 11:25 PM
698 Shops, fits feel of Georgetown 10/4/2019 11:16 PM
699 Retail first level 10/4/2019 11:16 PM
700 Something in line with our square 10/4/2019 11:05 PM
701 Plants, traditional Georgetown, pretty 10/4/2019 11:03 PM
702 Plants & shops 10/4/2019 10:50 PM
703 traditional small town beautiful 10/4/2019 10:49 PM
31 / 76
Downtown Georgetown Parking Garage
Page 71 of 85
704 traditional, blend with courthouse & Square 10/4/2019 10:47 PM
705 Should not stand out visually 10/4/2019 10:32 PM
706 traditional 10/4/2019 10:29 PM
707 Make it look similar to old town. Blend it in.10/4/2019 10:25 PM
708 Blend with elements around the square.10/4/2019 10:24 PM
709 Blend with the "Most Beautiful Square in Texas"10/4/2019 10:23 PM
710 Discreet and blending in with surroundings.10/4/2019 10:22 PM
711 Conservative, quiet, traditional, fits in.10/4/2019 10:17 PM
712 Traditional Georgetown appearance.10/4/2019 10:16 PM
713 Old style building 10/4/2019 10:15 PM
714 fits in with historic town square feel 10/4/2019 10:12 PM
715 tasteful, compatible architecture, convenient 10/4/2019 10:11 PM
716 Tradational 10/4/2019 10:09 PM
717 Match existing old square facades 10/4/2019 10:07 PM
718 I like the idea of retail and parking as it makes best use of the land 10/4/2019 9:58 PM
719 matching existing buildings surrounding the garage 10/4/2019 9:57 PM
720 Open appearance for safety 10/4/2019 9:53 PM
721 Tradition with modern flare, tasteful and fitting of the square 10/4/2019 9:51 PM
722 Match current downtown architecture 10/4/2019 9:48 PM
723 Big waste of our tax dollars 10/4/2019 9:47 PM
724 blend with existing downtown aesthetic 10/4/2019 9:24 PM
725 Blends with current buildings on square.10/4/2019 9:13 PM
726 1900 old town 10/4/2019 9:08 PM
727 fit in with square 10/4/2019 9:07 PM
728 Timeless and would age well 10/4/2019 8:43 PM
729 NO parking garage 10/4/2019 8:42 PM
730 welcoming, blend with neighbors, blend, not sterile, clean 10/4/2019 8:37 PM
731 blending in, welcoming, safe 10/4/2019 8:28 PM
732 In keeping with downtown aesthetics 10/4/2019 8:09 PM
733 Fits with the current downtown aesthetic 10/4/2019 7:44 PM
734 Does not dominate area 10/4/2019 7:38 PM
735 modern, green, pretty, colorful 10/4/2019 7:36 PM
736 Should fit the decor of the buildings in the downtown area 10/4/2019 7:35 PM
737 4 blocks east 10/4/2019 7:34 PM
738 modern take on classic architecture 10/4/2019 7:32 PM
739 Eco friendly, inimalist 10/4/2019 6:27 PM
740 More modern than traditional with art 10/4/2019 6:14 PM
741 A facade that fits the more historical look of downtown 10/4/2019 6:13 PM
742 Fits GT townsquare style!10/4/2019 6:02 PM
743 Maintain the feel of downtown 10/4/2019 5:46 PM
744 Can't we just ride bikes 10/4/2019 5:40 PM
32 / 76
Downtown Georgetown Parking Garage
Page 72 of 85
745 Blends with historic downtown buildings.10/4/2019 5:31 PM
746 Blend well with Square & Courthouse 10/4/2019 4:59 PM
747 Classy, historical, relevant 10/4/2019 4:54 PM
748 Similar to downtown square 10/4/2019 4:37 PM
749 Georgetown is a traditional town with lots of history...keep austin weird and funky. Keep
Georgetown normal!
10/4/2019 4:23 PM
750 Modern, but representative of Georgetown 10/4/2019 3:59 PM
751 Maintain the historical feel of downtown 10/4/2019 3:33 PM
752 blend with downtown 10/4/2019 3:29 PM
753 Don't build it 10/4/2019 3:26 PM
754 New but not too modern 10/4/2019 3:19 PM
755 Functional, matches downtown,10/4/2019 3:13 PM
756 Fits into style of Georgetown 10/4/2019 3:10 PM
757 Dont put one in 10/4/2019 3:03 PM
758 Should match surroundings 10/4/2019 3:00 PM
759 top floor garden. Exterior modern/art 10/4/2019 2:43 PM
760 Consistent w/ town; not exposed concrete 10/4/2019 2:41 PM
761 traditional materials and retail space 10/4/2019 2:30 PM
762 green, eco friendly, LEED certified 10/4/2019 2:28 PM
763 Traditional with modern technology added 10/4/2019 2:28 PM
764 Blend with downtown architecture.10/4/2019 2:23 PM
765 Less noticeable than actual destinations 10/4/2019 2:18 PM
766 Enclosed 10/4/2019 2:14 PM
767 Keep it square themed 10/4/2019 2:09 PM
768 Keep it small town. Not city.10/4/2019 2:02 PM
769 mix of old and contemporary 10/4/2019 2:00 PM
770 Not too modern. Needs to blend with Courthouse.10/4/2019 1:58 PM
771 I really like the combination of plants/nature and art. It's modern and speaks to the vibrancy of the
city.
10/4/2019 1:52 PM
772 Living, artistic, historic 10/4/2019 1:50 PM
773 in tune with the Square 10/4/2019 1:48 PM
774 Hometown charm 10/4/2019 1:45 PM
775 Classic that will age well 10/4/2019 1:37 PM
776 Keep traditional, historical look & feel of GT.10/4/2019 1:36 PM
777 I would prefer the garage not be in this location 10/4/2019 1:36 PM
778 Cosmopolitan, unobtrusive, artistic 10/4/2019 1:32 PM
779 stick to consistency with design in town - brick landscaping and 3 levels.10/4/2019 1:32 PM
780 Traditional 10/4/2019 1:27 PM
781 Something that fits with the square and courthouse.10/4/2019 1:23 PM
782 Full facade 10/4/2019 1:15 PM
783 Traditional, like the corners in the square 10/4/2019 1:10 PM
33 / 76
Downtown Georgetown Parking Garage
Page 73 of 85
784 Fit in with old town look.10/4/2019 1:10 PM
785 Classy & Traditional 10/4/2019 12:56 PM
786 Open and safe 10/4/2019 12:55 PM
787 1920s style 10/4/2019 12:23 PM
788 Historic traditional materials please 10/4/2019 12:14 PM
789 Traditional, brick, plants small trees 10/4/2019 12:07 PM
790 Context, connection, scale 10/4/2019 11:52 AM
791 Fitting with the style of the square. Traditional, not industrial or too modern.10/4/2019 11:50 AM
792 Match the square 10/4/2019 11:39 AM
793 Similar to surroundings 10/4/2019 11:31 AM
794 Fits into existing environment 10/4/2019 11:23 AM
795 Cheap or money generating 10/4/2019 11:20 AM
796 Safe, attractive, exciting 10/4/2019 10:46 AM
797 Leave the ugly 'artistic' look for Austin.10/4/2019 10:43 AM
798 Quaint 10/4/2019 9:37 AM
799 In keeping with the historic style of the rest of the downtown area 10/4/2019 7:00 AM
800 Traditional but showcase Georgetown culture 10/4/2019 6:58 AM
801 Timeless and classic 10/4/2019 6:17 AM
802 Plants and retail are two things I would love the city to consider.10/4/2019 5:36 AM
803 Match surrounding buildings.10/4/2019 4:40 AM
804 Historical, to complement The Square.10/4/2019 4:34 AM
805 Historical appeal 10/4/2019 4:25 AM
806 Consider surrounding architecture 10/4/2019 4:21 AM
807 Something that fits with downtown but a modern artistic twist.10/4/2019 4:01 AM
808 Mix of modern & traditional 10/4/2019 3:54 AM
809 similar to downtown historic buildings- e.g., brick, limestone. for safety- open-type staircases 10/4/2019 3:31 AM
810 Keep it georgetown.10/4/2019 3:29 AM
811 100% against this project 10/4/2019 3:02 AM
812 Inviting, open, compliments square, attractive 10/4/2019 2:56 AM
813 Integrated historically 10/4/2019 2:55 AM
814 Match the courthouse.10/4/2019 2:45 AM
815 Consistent with downtown 10/4/2019 2:43 AM
816 Matching old town 10/4/2019 2:42 AM
817 Traditional and classic 10/4/2019 2:34 AM
818 Needs to blend with what is around it 10/4/2019 2:30 AM
819 Historic historic historic 10/4/2019 2:16 AM
820 coordinate w/ Square w/ modern touch 10/4/2019 2:13 AM
821 One that ties in with the surrounding buildings 10/4/2019 2:08 AM
822 old town 10/4/2019 1:59 AM
823 First one was good 10/4/2019 1:52 AM
824 Simple. clean. Charming 10/4/2019 1:45 AM
34 / 76
Downtown Georgetown Parking Garage
Page 74 of 85
825 Traditional 10/4/2019 1:43 AM
826 Something traditional with a touch of art 10/4/2019 1:31 AM
827 Art deco 10/4/2019 1:18 AM
828 Historic, unique, character, greenery, attraction not eyesore 10/4/2019 1:14 AM
829 eye catching but reasonable and easy to maintain 10/4/2019 1:06 AM
830 Don't waste money keep it simple 10/4/2019 12:54 AM
831 Match existing buildings on square 10/4/2019 12:45 AM
832 Limestone central texas 10/4/2019 12:43 AM
833 Art, cool, hip 10/4/2019 12:37 AM
834 fitting to surrounding buildings 10/4/2019 12:20 AM
835 It blends in with the square 10/4/2019 12:07 AM
836 Artistic modern expression 10/3/2019 11:49 PM
837 Looks nice inexpensive up keep 10/3/2019 11:49 PM
838 Some of the examples looked dated 10/3/2019 11:40 PM
839 Mesh with the square’s flavor 10/3/2019 11:39 PM
840 Georgetown Chic 10/3/2019 11:32 PM
841 Traditional Green Retail 10/3/2019 11:29 PM
842 Modern and classic 10/3/2019 11:28 PM
843 Old yet modern 10/3/2019 11:24 PM
844 Modern sheik 10/3/2019 11:18 PM
845 Traditional artistic not modern 10/3/2019 11:18 PM
846 Historically compatible, unobtrusive, low impact 10/3/2019 11:10 PM
847 Complementary design to original square 10/3/2019 10:46 PM
848 Nature 10/3/2019 10:27 PM
849 Keep Georgetown quaint, do not copy Austin 10/3/2019 10:26 PM
850 No Garage!10/3/2019 9:44 PM
851 Should be built to blend like CVS or Watson building. Also look at new city hall for guild line.10/3/2019 9:44 PM
852 3-stories, old building look, two exists -main & 6th 10/3/2019 9:41 PM
853 similar to historic square architecture 10/3/2019 9:41 PM
854 Traditional Georgetown look 10/3/2019 9:39 PM
855 Keep with downtown rustic theme 10/3/2019 9:38 PM
856 Brick facade 10/3/2019 9:33 PM
857 Y’all got some good ideas 10/3/2019 9:30 PM
858 Architecturally relevant to other buildings on the Square 10/3/2019 9:29 PM
859 Fit in with the existing Beautiful Georgetown Sq.!10/3/2019 9:29 PM
860 Don’t make it look like Austin 10/3/2019 9:25 PM
861 Traditional to be compatible with old town look 10/3/2019 9:22 PM
862 Needs to fit old town feel 10/3/2019 9:17 PM
863 The tallest bldg in town shouldn't be a parking facility.10/3/2019 9:13 PM
864 Modern lighted with planters 10/3/2019 9:03 PM
865 Plants 10/3/2019 9:02 PM
35 / 76
Downtown Georgetown Parking Garage
Page 75 of 85
866 Functionally simple 10/3/2019 9:01 PM
867 Natural 10/3/2019 8:59 PM
868 Complimentary to Old Town 10/3/2019 8:45 PM
869 Something that blends in with old town style. plants are a great idea 10/3/2019 8:42 PM
870 use local/native materials 10/3/2019 8:42 PM
871 Belong in Old Georgetown 10/3/2019 8:20 PM
872 Mix of modern and traditional 10/3/2019 8:10 PM
873 Blends well with historic downtown charm 10/3/2019 8:07 PM
874 not obviously a garage 10/3/2019 8:06 PM
875 Old town Georgetown style 10/3/2019 8:05 PM
876 True to old Georgetown style 10/3/2019 8:03 PM
877 Traditional and old style to match downtown 10/3/2019 7:59 PM
878 No Art Deco 10/3/2019 7:54 PM
879 classic 10/3/2019 7:34 PM
880 UGLY What are you doing to downtown?10/3/2019 7:34 PM
881 Do not build one 10/3/2019 7:29 PM
882 Artsy, not institutionalized 10/3/2019 7:21 PM
883 Don't make it look like Austin 10/3/2019 7:11 PM
884 fits in with existing structures 10/3/2019 7:03 PM
885 something to fit in with existing architecture.10/3/2019 7:03 PM
886 Something that fits the architecture of the square.10/3/2019 7:01 PM
887 Pimp it out 10/3/2019 7:00 PM
888 Aesthetically blending with historic charm 10/3/2019 6:59 PM
889 In between modern and historic. Fresh looking 10/3/2019 6:58 PM
890 Traditional similar to current square buildings 10/3/2019 6:58 PM
891 Something unique and artsy.10/3/2019 6:53 PM
892 It needs to fit in to the Square 10/3/2019 6:53 PM
893 N/a 10/3/2019 6:45 PM
894 It needs to match the decor currently in the historic district.10/3/2019 6:41 PM
895 Not Austiny 10/3/2019 6:38 PM
896 Classic/traditional 10/3/2019 6:35 PM
897 blend with historic square architecture 10/3/2019 6:26 PM
898 I would like something that enhances our existing square and fits into the current historic feel 10/3/2019 6:25 PM
899 Traditional to better match downtown architecture 10/3/2019 6:24 PM
900 Fits in with surroundings 10/3/2019 6:17 PM
901 Eclectic 10/3/2019 6:04 PM
902 Fits in with Historic Georgetown Area 10/3/2019 5:29 PM
903 Something that blends in 10/3/2019 5:08 PM
904 Traditional, historic appearance 10/3/2019 5:06 PM
905 Traditional to go with the look of the historical town.10/3/2019 4:55 PM
906 red brick, more in keeping with downtown 10/3/2019 4:51 PM
36 / 76
Downtown Georgetown Parking Garage
Page 76 of 85
907 Vibrant with plants 10/3/2019 4:48 PM
908 Traditional, historic, classic 10/3/2019 4:47 PM
909 Keep Historical 10/3/2019 4:41 PM
910 Plants and art 10/3/2019 4:34 PM
911 Slightly modern with greenery 10/3/2019 4:28 PM
912 Blend of Traditional/Artistic/Natural-Plantscapes/10/3/2019 4:18 PM
913 Subtle, but cool. Not like the one at the justice center 10/3/2019 4:15 PM
914 Traditional parking spaces 10/3/2019 4:08 PM
915 Blends well with the square, "green", not too modern 10/3/2019 3:56 PM
916 needs to go with the historic look of downtown 10/3/2019 3:46 PM
917 Unobtrusive. Blends with surroundings 10/3/2019 3:34 PM
918 Blend with the surrounding architecture 10/3/2019 3:30 PM
919 blends history of downtown and nature 10/3/2019 3:17 PM
920 in keeping with history of downtown architecture 10/3/2019 3:06 PM
921 modern yet blends with the square asthetic 10/3/2019 2:58 PM
922 old town charm and artsy 10/3/2019 2:55 PM
923 blend in with downtown Georgetown 10/3/2019 2:37 PM
924 Greenery, windows, first floor shopping.10/3/2019 2:30 PM
925 Contemporary practical art 10/3/2019 2:30 PM
926 Build at the library 10/3/2019 2:22 PM
927 Fits in with surrounding buildings 10/3/2019 2:21 PM
928 traditional mixed use.10/3/2019 2:20 PM
929 Modern, landscaping, green walls/planters 10/3/2019 2:13 PM
930 Should blend in with historic properties 10/3/2019 2:09 PM
931 efficient and low cost 10/3/2019 2:03 PM
932 include native greenery 10/3/2019 2:01 PM
933 Remember Downtown Georgetown in design 10/3/2019 1:56 PM
934 Below grade 10/3/2019 1:55 PM
935 This is Texas - Remember it 10/3/2019 1:54 PM
936 not an eyesore 10/3/2019 1:36 PM
937 reflect old city charm 10/3/2019 1:33 PM
938 traditional artistic functional 10/3/2019 1:33 PM
939 Na 10/3/2019 1:25 PM
940 Decor that fits Georgetown vibe 10/3/2019 1:23 PM
941 Classy, clean, minimalist 10/3/2019 1:22 PM
942 Must match the downtown facade.10/3/2019 1:19 PM
943 simple open w/trees natural landscaping 10/3/2019 1:13 PM
944 Please have it fit the look and feel of downtown Georgetown.10/3/2019 1:05 PM
945 Keep design within downtown Georgetown ok school design. Don't start putting up ugly steel
structures for the sake of progress. Keep the charm of Georgetown together for future generations
10/3/2019 1:03 PM
946 Keep it Georgetown 10/3/2019 12:42 PM
37 / 76
Downtown Georgetown Parking Garage
Page 77 of 85
947 I don't want a parking garage 10/3/2019 12:38 PM
948 Traditional 10/3/2019 12:32 PM
949 Fit with Downtown look.10/3/2019 12:31 PM
950 Make it look like a building , not a parking garage.10/3/2019 12:25 PM
951 Only 2 story bldg 10/3/2019 12:12 PM
952 Someplace else!10/3/2019 12:05 PM
953 Consistent with history of the square but modern in functional keeping the architectural integrity’s
of the area of the square.
10/3/2019 12:03 PM
954 Something keeping the current flavor of the square, old, antiquey, western.10/3/2019 12:01 PM
955 Blend with surroundings 10/3/2019 11:57 AM
956 Consistent with local architecture 10/3/2019 11:55 AM
957 Blends with existing 10/3/2019 11:43 AM
958 Innovative Uniquely Georgetown 10/3/2019 11:32 AM
959 Traditional stone&brick. Arched windows 10/3/2019 11:25 AM
960 Classic storefront charm 10/3/2019 11:11 AM
961 It needs to fit with old town.10/3/2019 10:57 AM
962 Updated traditional square look 10/3/2019 10:43 AM
963 Historic Georgetown - please keep in tradition of who we are 10/3/2019 10:03 AM
964 Not artsy,but modern 10/3/2019 9:40 AM
965 Follow Historic Georgetown theme.10/3/2019 9:29 AM
966 Historic, classic, high end, nature, unassuming 10/3/2019 8:49 AM
967 Modern with glass 10/3/2019 8:14 AM
968 Thanks 10/3/2019 8:14 AM
969 Traditional downtown feeling 10/3/2019 8:00 AM
970 Fits in with historical buildings 10/3/2019 5:52 AM
971 Shame on crooked Pitts and Gonzalez.10/3/2019 4:32 AM
972 Glass and planters would be very unique and cool. Also having a first floor retail would be
phenomenal!
10/3/2019 3:57 AM
973 NONE! WRONG LOCATION 10/3/2019 3:47 AM
974 Traditional to fit into our historic downtown with maybe a modern twist like glass or public art.10/3/2019 3:30 AM
975 Retail that fits the city with parking above.10/3/2019 3:25 AM
976 Short and fat -- like the Mayor.10/3/2019 3:21 AM
977 Move it to W. 8th St. at MLK St.. its a bigger location 10/3/2019 3:15 AM
978 Interesting, not monolithic 10/3/2019 3:12 AM
979 Something for people to enjoy not just a place to park.10/3/2019 3:11 AM
980 Georgetown-like, traditional, demure, tasteful, conservative 10/3/2019 3:08 AM
981 appropriate for historic district 10/3/2019 3:07 AM
982 Traditional-Like downtown 10/3/2019 3:05 AM
983 Historic feel with modern elements 10/3/2019 2:58 AM
984 Something Classical yet modern listen to native texans, no artsy crap! People that move here from
Californias Opinion should be invalid.
10/3/2019 2:46 AM
985 Traditional to match square 10/3/2019 2:45 AM
38 / 76
Downtown Georgetown Parking Garage
Page 78 of 85
986 Traditional architecture that will match the other downtown buildings 10/3/2019 2:24 AM
987 Art, fun, beautiful, functional 10/3/2019 2:24 AM
988 Retail at the base not modern but brick and glass would be nice 10/3/2019 2:18 AM
989 Do not build and take away from charm 10/3/2019 2:09 AM
990 It MUST fit the character of the historic district and Square architecture. Too much greenery
wastes water and increases cost.
10/3/2019 2:09 AM
991 Blend with historic area 10/3/2019 2:01 AM
992 Fit in with downtown 10/3/2019 1:54 AM
993 cool lighting, planters, simple 10/3/2019 1:49 AM
994 authentic, relevant, aesthetic, accessible 10/3/2019 1:31 AM
995 I prefer you to leave things alone. This is not our historic gtown.10/3/2019 1:25 AM
996 Old Town 10/3/2019 1:09 AM
997 Keep it quaint and with the current feel of the square, but with greenery.10/3/2019 12:59 AM
998 Historic with modern accents 10/3/2019 12:57 AM
999 It’s alright 10/3/2019 12:56 AM
1000 Traditional 10/3/2019 12:54 AM
1001 Historic Old Town 10/3/2019 12:54 AM
1002 Bottom area for mobile vendors 10/3/2019 12:42 AM
1003 Matches or compliments the neighborhood 10/3/2019 12:14 AM
1004 Clean, landscaping, simple 10/3/2019 12:13 AM
1005 Green not flashy practical simple 10/3/2019 12:04 AM
1006 Fits area aesthetic 10/3/2019 12:00 AM
1007 Spend money on a good design, dont rush it 10/2/2019 11:54 PM
1008 No parking garage whatsoever. Waste of taxpayers (me) money.10/2/2019 11:45 PM
1009 Blend in with existing structures 10/2/2019 11:44 PM
1010 Modern with greenery 10/2/2019 11:24 PM
1011 Public ground-floor use, decorative facade 10/2/2019 11:24 PM
1012 Organic hip better than Wilco garage 10/2/2019 11:20 PM
1013 matches old charm of existing buildings 10/2/2019 10:54 PM
1014 Green + brick/traditional. Anything else would be an eye sore 10/2/2019 10:43 PM
1015 innovative, sustainable, not-garage-like 10/2/2019 10:39 PM
1016 Match surrounding buildings 10/2/2019 10:28 PM
1017 I would not prefer a garage. Bad idea 10/2/2019 10:21 PM
1018 Green, retail, camouflaged 10/2/2019 10:16 PM
1019 Not too much glass 10/2/2019 10:14 PM
1020 historical looking to match square architecture 10/2/2019 10:10 PM
1021 Clean colorful 10/2/2019 10:08 PM
1022 in keeping with our beautiful downtown's architecture 10/2/2019 10:05 PM
1023 Simple charm like Georgetown 10/2/2019 10:03 PM
1024 Greenery and murals 10/2/2019 9:58 PM
1025 I would like to see something that blends in with the charm of old town 10/2/2019 9:57 PM
39 / 76
Downtown Georgetown Parking Garage
Page 79 of 85
1026 Not ugly, as many are 10/2/2019 9:55 PM
1027 Blend-in with traditional local materials, green or eco-friendly 10/2/2019 9:49 PM
1028 Not boring. Not crazy.10/2/2019 9:46 PM
1029 Modern lines using traditional materials with greenery or art 10/2/2019 9:45 PM
1030 Clean & Classy 10/2/2019 9:45 PM
1031 Murals/Art depicting history of Georgetown 10/2/2019 9:43 PM
1032 public ammenity beyond the automobile 10/2/2019 9:41 PM
1033 green 10/2/2019 9:40 PM
1034 Downtown Georgetown 10/2/2019 9:38 PM
1035 More retail, functional, cost effective, low maintenance, art free 10/2/2019 9:37 PM
1036 Keep the quaint Georgetown hometown feeling 10/2/2019 9:37 PM
1037 First Floor Retail Three Stories 10/2/2019 9:24 PM
1038 Colonial Revival or Romanesque Revival 10/2/2019 9:16 PM
1039 historic, blend in old town 10/2/2019 8:43 PM
1040 Blends well with current dowtown.10/2/2019 8:27 PM
1041 traditional look 10/2/2019 8:20 PM
1042 Utilitarian mult-use 10/2/2019 8:09 PM
1043 Historical feel to match Square 10/2/2019 8:06 PM
1044 Match with the design vernacular of the old town. Like the first picture with I got to the website with
it looking like four story brick building with windows.
10/2/2019 7:59 PM
1045 Nothing cringeworthy!10/2/2019 7:52 PM
1046 Traditional materials, not large in scale, green landscape buffer, not in this location 10/2/2019 7:50 PM
1047 I think the should be other location for the parking garage 10/2/2019 7:50 PM
1048 Traditional, historic-downtown 10/2/2019 7:43 PM
1049 lots of lighting 10/2/2019 7:35 PM
1050 Something that blends in with the area.10/2/2019 7:35 PM
1051 Fits in with historic Square 10/2/2019 7:26 PM
1052 Fits with downtown Georgetown 10/2/2019 7:25 PM
1053 Fits with area 10/2/2019 7:20 PM
1054 Traditional. Harmonious. Small.10/2/2019 7:04 PM
1055 Natural, Fits with surroundings 10/2/2019 7:03 PM
1056 something that will go with the other buildings 10/2/2019 7:01 PM
1057 Conservative 10/2/2019 6:56 PM
1058 Modern classic 10/2/2019 6:54 PM
1059 Ground floor retail. Greenery.10/2/2019 6:45 PM
1060 Green/landscape or traditional 10/2/2019 6:45 PM
1061 fit with the current downtown 10/2/2019 6:41 PM
1062 Historic, character, nostalgic 10/2/2019 6:40 PM
1063 Natural or historical 10/2/2019 6:31 PM
1064 Green planters for cleaner air.10/2/2019 6:19 PM
1065 Useful beyond parking 10/2/2019 6:15 PM
40 / 76
Downtown Georgetown Parking Garage
Page 80 of 85
1066 Keep it in line with historical Georgetown please.10/2/2019 6:14 PM
1067 Classic 10/2/2019 6:13 PM
1068 Historic, Multifunctional, Green (all re: design)10/2/2019 6:08 PM
1069 No parking garage in this location at all!10/2/2019 6:06 PM
1070 consistent with the other City of Georgetown architecture 10/2/2019 6:06 PM
1071 Matches esthetic of current square 10/2/2019 6:06 PM
1072 Maximize parking spots 10/2/2019 5:56 PM
1073 Simple 10/2/2019 5:54 PM
1074 Stay with Historic Georgetown feel 10/2/2019 5:51 PM
1075 traditional design and colors that fit with the vibe of the square 10/2/2019 5:43 PM
1076 Trees. Plants. Vines. Plant wall.10/2/2019 5:37 PM
1077 nothing millennials would like 10/2/2019 5:36 PM
1078 Needs to blend with square 10/2/2019 5:36 PM
1079 Consistent with historical designs 10/2/2019 5:34 PM
1080 Calm, quiet, inclusive 10/2/2019 5:32 PM
1081 Make it in keeping with the buildings around it--brick color, outside facade like surrounding
buildingss
10/2/2019 5:21 PM
1082 Something green to promote the city’s green energy usage 10/2/2019 5:14 PM
1083 match the current stone, brick, or concrete of other buildings on or around the square.10/2/2019 5:13 PM
1084 Old town, nostalgic, beautiful 10/2/2019 5:11 PM
1085 Vintage brick mortar 10/2/2019 5:11 PM
1086 Something modern and pleasing to the eye 10/2/2019 5:11 PM
1087 Fit with downtown 10/2/2019 5:10 PM
1088 Excellent display and curb appeal 10/2/2019 5:09 PM
1089 Like brick. The idea of retail is good.10/2/2019 5:07 PM
1090 Design that fit the style of the square , possible Beaux-Arts architecture style 10/2/2019 5:00 PM
1091 Stick with the theme of the square 10/2/2019 4:59 PM
1092 Stick with historical look with retail on bottom with nice landscaping 10/2/2019 4:37 PM
1093 Characteristic of downtown charm 10/2/2019 4:35 PM
1094 No design. No parking garage.10/2/2019 4:34 PM
1095 thoughtful, quality materials, architecture not engineering 10/2/2019 4:32 PM
1096 Festive, artistic and inviting 10/2/2019 4:30 PM
1097 Georgetown-appropriate, easily navigated 10/2/2019 4:29 PM
1098 artistic, landscaping, modern 10/2/2019 4:28 PM
1099 Old style that matches the square 10/2/2019 4:26 PM
1100 Not too modern 10/2/2019 4:23 PM
1101 Unaware I am looking at a parking garage ( as much as possible )10/2/2019 4:22 PM
1102 Cheap 10/2/2019 4:22 PM
1103 Same aesthetics as surrounding area 10/2/2019 4:21 PM
1104 compliments current downtown style 10/2/2019 4:21 PM
1105 unique with some Georgetown historical value to it.10/2/2019 4:20 PM
41 / 76
Downtown Georgetown Parking Garage
Page 81 of 85
1106 Historic , blend in ,10/2/2019 4:19 PM
1107 It needs to match with old town 10/2/2019 4:18 PM
1108 one two three 10/2/2019 4:17 PM
1109 Compatible with surrounding buildings 10/2/2019 4:15 PM
1110 Keep it Georgetown tradition, NOT Austin weird.10/2/2019 4:14 PM
1111 stately historical quaint Texan 10/2/2019 4:13 PM
1112 Modern design reflecting heritage 10/2/2019 4:11 PM
1113 Something appropriate for downtown, yet reflects current design trends.10/2/2019 4:11 PM
1114 Conservative, understated, natural 10/2/2019 4:10 PM
1115 Match historic neighborhood. Shorter height.10/2/2019 4:08 PM
1116 Old, stone, brick 10/2/2019 4:08 PM
1117 Harmony with downtown, native plants 10/2/2019 4:01 PM
1118 I want it to blend in with downtown 10/2/2019 4:00 PM
1119 Historical, traditional, 1900s, Trees 10/2/2019 4:00 PM
1120 Visually appealing 10/2/2019 4:00 PM
1121 Traditional concrete style.10/2/2019 4:00 PM
1122 Want to maintain the feel of the downtown area AND like to include more retail space under it.10/2/2019 4:00 PM
1123 Traditional Texas 10/2/2019 3:57 PM
1124 WESTERN APPEARENCE 10/2/2019 3:54 PM
1125 Traditional w/trim , landscaped, keep it under budget 10/2/2019 3:52 PM
1126 early 20th century facade 10/2/2019 3:51 PM
1127 Mixed Traditional Urban Retail 10/2/2019 3:48 PM
1128 Keep in Character of Georgetown 10/2/2019 3:47 PM
1129 Traditional to match existing buildings on the square.10/2/2019 3:47 PM
1130 First floor retail or displays.10/2/2019 3:44 PM
1131 Green. For parking, not retail.10/2/2019 3:43 PM
1132 Imperative that design fits in with the current architecture of the city!10/2/2019 3:42 PM
1133 Underground 10/2/2019 3:42 PM
1134 modern cool free.10/2/2019 3:40 PM
1135 historic and invisible 10/2/2019 3:40 PM
1136 compatible with existing structures 10/2/2019 3:39 PM
1137 It needs to fit with the " Old Town Charm" of the Square 10/2/2019 3:38 PM
1138 Should be matched with downtown Georgetown 10/2/2019 3:37 PM
1139 modern, nature, art 10/2/2019 3:33 PM
1140 modern 10/2/2019 3:32 PM
1141 traditional compatible historical beautiful 10/2/2019 3:31 PM
1142 Concrete post tension with cable rails, stone exterior and hanging gardens.10/2/2019 3:29 PM
1143 Traditional appearance as courthouse square.10/2/2019 3:29 PM
1144 Blends with downtown building materials 10/2/2019 3:28 PM
1145 Blend, stone or brick, greenery 10/2/2019 3:27 PM
1146 Hopefully free parking?10/2/2019 3:26 PM
42 / 76
Downtown Georgetown Parking Garage
Page 82 of 85
1147 Contemporary but not out of place 10/2/2019 3:25 PM
1148 Easily maintained with minimal ongoing care --no planters 10/2/2019 3:25 PM
1149 Modern twist of traditional style 10/2/2019 3:24 PM
1150 Brick/Stone structure with first floor retail/office space 10/2/2019 3:24 PM
1151 Historic design like buildings around the square 10/2/2019 3:24 PM
1152 Retro Traditional limestone 10/2/2019 3:22 PM
1153 Modern industrial with traditional accents 10/2/2019 3:21 PM
1154 Traditional to fit in with what’s already there 10/2/2019 3:20 PM
1155 blend with square architecture 10/2/2019 3:20 PM
1156 Looks aqs though it has always been here 10/2/2019 3:20 PM
1157 historic, fits in 10/2/2019 3:17 PM
1158 Not too modern looking 10/2/2019 3:16 PM
1159 Georgetown with droughttolerant landscaping 10/2/2019 3:14 PM
1160 Trees, grass, and water fountain like what’s there now!10/2/2019 3:11 PM
1161 Fit character of downtown!10/2/2019 3:10 PM
1162 HARC approval!10/2/2019 3:09 PM
1163 Blend of modern and traditional 10/2/2019 1:56 PM
1164 historic architecture, plant life, antique-ish 10/2/2019 1:50 PM
1165 strong, attractive and modern 10/2/2019 3:44 AM
1166 non-intrusive, simple, safe, accessible 10/2/2019 3:20 AM
1167 Style that represents Georgetown 10/2/2019 1:23 AM
1168 Fits with surrounding buildings, efficient 10/1/2019 9:24 PM
1169 Artsy but not too modern 10/1/2019 8:34 PM
1170 looks like the square 10/1/2019 8:33 PM
1171 modern, old town charm 10/1/2019 8:01 PM
1172 Blends into the existing downtown 10/1/2019 7:26 PM
1173 Simple, functional, cost/space effective 10/1/2019 7:06 PM
1174 traditional and historic, with some modern flair 10/1/2019 6:55 PM
1175 Consistent with existing architecture; artistic elements 10/1/2019 6:49 PM
1176 Fun, colorful, open air 10/1/2019 6:27 PM
1177 modern, light, glass, open 10/1/2019 6:21 PM
1178 blend into the neighborhood 10/1/2019 6:00 PM
1179 modern, community oriented 10/1/2019 6:00 PM
1180 sustainable eco-friendly materials artistic 10/1/2019 5:14 PM
1181 traditional stone 10/1/2019 4:45 PM
1182 small town charm 10/1/2019 4:38 PM
1183 Vibrant, Artistic, Green,Modern, Unique attraction 10/1/2019 4:24 PM
1184 complientary to neighborhood, green, art 10/1/2019 4:17 PM
1185 Artistic, colorful, unique to Georgetown 10/1/2019 4:10 PM
1186 modern, artistic, innovative 10/1/2019 4:06 PM
1187 Artistic elements included and landscaping 10/1/2019 3:57 PM
43 / 76
Downtown Georgetown Parking Garage
Page 83 of 85
1188 Something that can both display art and match the aesthetic of the Square 10/1/2019 3:55 PM
1189 artistic 10/1/2019 3:54 PM
1190 modern that appreciates and embraces the past 10/1/2019 3:43 PM
1191 artistic with historic appeal 10/1/2019 3:07 PM
1192 Lots of spaces, safe, lighting 10/1/2019 11:09 AM
44 / 76
Downtown Georgetown Parking Garage
Page 84 of 85
City of Georgetown, Texas
Downtown Parking Garage Stakeholder Steering Committee
March 5, 2020
S UB J E C T:
IT E M S UMMARY:
F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
N/A
S UB MIT T E D B Y:
Mic hael Walton P arking G arage C o-C hairs
Page 85 of 85