Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda_GTEC_11.19.2014Notice of Meeting for the Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corp and the Governing Body of the City of Georgetown November 19, 2014 at 3:30 PM at GMC, 300-1 Industrial Ave, Georgetown, Texas 78626 The City of Georgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If you require assistance in participating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the ADA, reasonable assistance, adaptations, or accommodations will be provided upon request. Please contact the City at least four (4) days prior to the scheduled meeting date, at (512) 930-3652 or City Hall at 113 East 8th Street for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. Regular Session (This Regular Session may, at any time, be recessed to convene an Executive Session for any purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code 551.) A Call to Order The Board may, at any time, recess the Regular Session to convene in Executive Session at the request of the Chair, a Board Member, the City Manager, Assistant City Manager, General Manager of Utilities, City Council Member, or legal counsel for any purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code Chapter 551, and are subject to action in the Regular Session that follows. B Introduction of Visitors C Industry/CAMPO/TXDOT Updates D Discussion regarding the Project Progress Reports and Time Lines. – Bill Dryden, P.E., Transportation Engineer, and Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Transportation Services Director. E Presentation of Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation monthly financial report for October 2014. Micki Rundell, Chief Financial Officer, COG, Finance Manager GTEC F Presentation and discussion of the 2015 Transportation Bond Committee initial project list.- Nat Waggoner, Transportation Analyst, Tom Crawford, Bond Committee Chair, Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Transportation Services Director. Legislative Regular Agenda G Consideration and possible action to approve minutes from the regular GTEC Board meeting held October 15, 2014. Jim Briggs, General Manager - GTEC H PUBLIC HEARING by the Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation (GTEC) regarding the expenditure of 4B sales tax funds for the adopted 2014/15 Budget. - Micki Rundell, Chief Financial Officer, COG Finance Manager, GTEC I Discussion and possible action regarding amending the 2014/15 GTEC Budget for new projects for 2014/15. Micki Rundell, Chief Financial Officer, COG, Finance Manager, GTEC J Consideration and possible action to approve an Amended Performance Agreement for the Summit at Rivery project. - Bridget Chapman, City Attorney, Micki Rundell, CFO, and Jim Briggs, Interim City Manger K EXECUTIVE SESSION In compliance with the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, Government Code, Vernon's Texas Codes, Annotated, the items listed below will be discussed in closed session and are subject to action in the regular session. Section 551.071 – Consultation with Attorney Discussion and deliberation on proposed settlement of the following condemnation proceedings in connection with the FM 1460 Improvement Project (North Segment): a. Cause No. 13-1718-CC4; The State of Texas and the City of Georgetown v. Rabbit Hill Partners and First State Bank Central Texas; Condemnation Proceeding, County Court at Law No. 4, Williamson County, Texas (TxDOT RCSJ #2211-02-019 Parcel 211) b. Cause No. 13-1719-CC1; The State of Texas and the City of Georgetown v. Gordon L. Peterson, Brian F. Peterson, and Peggy Peterson; Condemnation Proceeding, County Court at Law No. 1, Williamson County, Texas (TxDOT RCSJ #2211-02-019 Parcel 212) c. Cause No. 13-1721-CC3; The State of Texas and the City of Georgetown v. Brian Felix Peterson, Peggy Peterson and JDS, Inc., d/b/a First Option Mortgage Services; Condemnation Proceeding, County Court at Law No. 3, Williamson County, Texas (TxDOT RCSJ #2211-02-019 Parcel 215) - Kristina Silcocks, Attorney for the City, and Terri Glasby Calhoun, Real Estate Services Coordinator and Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Transportation Services Director Section 551.072 - Deliberation Regarding Real Property Discussion and deliberation on acquisition of real property from The Guy, Jr. Family Trust, dated October 2, 2003, W.T. Guy, Jr. and Valaree C. Guy Trustors and Monnajene G. Knight, Trustee for The Britton Family Trust, in connection with the Southwest Bypass Road Project – Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Transportation Services Director, and Terri Glasby Calhoun, Real Estate Services Coordinator L Action from Executive Session Adjournment CERTIFICATE OF POSTING I, Jessica Brettle, City Secretary for the City of Georgetown, Texas, do hereby certify that this Notice of Meeting was posted at City Hall, 113 E. 8th Street, a place readily accessible to the general public at all times, on the ______ day of __________________, 2014, at __________, and remained so posted for at least 72 continuous hours preceding the scheduled time of said meeting. ____________________________________ Jessica Brettle, City Secretary City of Georgetown, Texas SUBJECT: Discussion regarding the Project Progress Reports and Time Lines. – Bill Dryden, P.E., Transportation Engineer, and Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Transportation Services Director. ITEM SUMMARY: GTEC Projects FM 1460 ROW & Utility Relocations – Project No. 5RB Mays Street Extension (Teravista Parkway to Westinghouse Road) – Project No. 5RI NB Frontage Road (SS 158 to Lakeway Dr.) – Project No. 5QY Northwest Blvd Overpass – Project No. 5QX Rivery Boulevard Extension (Williams to Northwest Blvd) – Project 5RM Snead Drive – Project 5QZ Southwest Bypass – Project No. 5QC Wolf Ranch Pkwy Extension – Project No. 5QW GTEC Project Update & Status Report GTAB Projects Austin Avenue Bridge Evaluation and Repairs FM 971 Realignment at Austin Avenue FM 971 Improvements in San Gabriel Park FM 1460 Improvements Project MS4 Permit Update N Austin Avenue Sidewalk Improvements OTP Update Sidewalk Master Plan Smith Branch Southeast Inner Loop Corridor Study Southwest Bypass Project (TIP #14C) Transit Study as Requested by City Council Transportation Services Operations – CIP Maintenance FINANCIAL IMPACT: None SUBMITTED BY: Bill Dryden, P.E., Transportation Engineer ATTACHMENTS: Description Type GTEC - November Updates Exhibit GTEC - Project Status - 2014-11 Exhibit GTAB - November Updates Exhibit FM 1460  (Quail Valley Drive to University Drive)  Project No. 5RB     TIP No. EEa, EEb & EEc  Rights‐of‐Way Acquisition and Utility Relocation  November 2014  Project Description Acquisition of ROW and relocation of utilities for the FM 1460 Project (Quail Valley Drive  to University Drive).  Purpose To have all ROWs cleared and utilities prior to TxDOT letting the project foe construction.  Project Managers Ed Polasek, AICP and Bill Dryden, P.E.  Engineer Brown and Gay Engineers, Inc.    Element Status / Issues  Design Complete.  Environmental/  Archeological  Environmental approved with Project Schematic.  Rights of Way    As of October 16th, the City has obtained  Possession and Use Agreements or have  closings planned within the next couple  weeks for all the remaining FM 1460  parcels.  Section:  North South  Acquired:  31 8  Pending:  3 ‐  Condemnation:  2 ‐  Total:  36 8  Utility Relocations Utility Relocation Agreements were approved by Council at its October 28th  meeting.  Construction Construction scheduled to begin in February 2015.  Other Issues None pending.    Mays Street Extension  (Teravista Parkway in Round Rock to Westinghouse Road)  Project No. 5RI     TIP No. None  November 2014  Unchanged  Project Description Extend Rabbit Hill Road northward from Teravista Parkway to the existing intersection  with Westinghouse Road. The widening along Westinghouse Road and Rabbit Hill Road  will also be included in the schematic for additional turning lanes to/from Westinghouse  Road. Preliminary layouts for future signals and roadway illumination will also be  included.  The project length along the anticipated alignment is approximately 1.0 miles.  Purpose To complete the schematic design, define rights‐of‐way requirements and complete 30%  design.  Project Managers Bill Dryden, P.E.  Engineer CP&Y, Inc.    Element Status / Issues  Design Engineering has submitted the proposed alignment and is working on the 30%  PS&E.  Environmental/  Archeological  TBD  Rights of Way TBD.  Utility Relocations TBD  Construction TBD  Other Issues None.    NB Frontage Road  (SS 158 to Lakeway Drive)  Project No. 5QX      TIP No. QQ  November 2014  Unchanged  Project Description Design and construct a portion of an IH‐35 NB Frontage Road from Williams Drive to  Northwest Boulevard Bridge of a proposed NB FR which would ultimately extend to  Lakeway Drive.  Purpose To relieve congestion in the Williams Drive/Austin Avenue intersection by providing a NB  alternate, interim route to FM 971 and Georgetown High School. This project is the only  remaining portion of IH 35 in Central Texas without a frontage road existing, under  construction or being designed.  Project Manager Bill Dryden  Engineer Klotz Associates       Element Status / Issues  Design Staff and Engineer has met with TxDOT personnel at both the local Area Office and  District Environmental Division.  Environmental/  Archeology  TBD  Rights of Way None identified  Utility Relocations TBD  Construction TBD  Other Issues Staff is working with TxDOT to develop the AFAs required to complete the project.    Northwest Boulevard Overpass  (Fontana Drive to Austin Avenue)  Project No. 5QX     TIP No. QQ  November 2014  Unchanged  Project Description Construction of overpass and surface roads to connect Northwest Boulevard with  Austin Avenue and FM 971.  Purpose This project will relieve congestion at the Austin Avenue/Williams Drive  intersection and provide a more direct access from the west side of IH 35 corridor to  Georgetown High School and SH 130 via FM 971.  Project Manager Bill Dryden, P.E.  Engineer Klotz Associates    Element Status / Issues  Design Engineer has presented the Preliminary Engineering Report and has begun final  PS&E design efforts.  Environmental/  Archeological  Concurrent with preliminary engineering and schematic design.  Rights of Way Engineer is developing ROW strip map and individual parcel plats and documents.  Utility Relocations TBD  Construction TBD  Other Issues Staff met with TxDOT to develop an AFA for TxDOT review of the bridge crossing  of I 35 and its frontage roads.    Rivery Boulevard Extension  (Williams Drive to Northwest Boulevard @ Fontana Drive)  Project No. 5RM     TIP No. None   November 2014  Project Description Develop the Rights‐of‐Way Map, acquire ROW, address potential environmental  issues and complete construction plans specifications and estimate (PS&E) for the  extension of Rivery Boulevard from Williams Drive to Northwest Boulevard at  Fontana Drive in anticipation of future funding availability.  Purpose To provide a route between Williams Drive and Northwest Boulevard serving the  Gateway area, providing an alternate route from Williams Drive to the future  Northwest Boulevard Bridge over IH 35, to provide a route between the hotels in  the Gateway area and the proposed Conference Center near Rivery Boulevard and  Wolf Ranch Parkway.  Project Manager Bill Dryden, P.E.  Engineer Kasberg Patrick and Associates    Element Status / Issues  Design Engineer has begun surveying and design.  Environmental/  Archeology  TBD  Rights of Way Will begin when surveying is complete.  Utility Relocations TBD  Construction TBD  Other Issues TBD    Snead Drive Project  (SE Inner Loop to Airborn Circle)  Project No. 5QZ      TIP No. None  November 2014  Unchanged  Project Description   Develop Construction Plans Specifications and Estimate (PS&E) for the widening  of Snead Drive from S.E. Inner Loop to 600 feet north of Cooperative Way,  including appurtenant waste water improvements.  Purpose This project has been identified as GTEC eligible project and will provide  necessary infrastructure for ongoing economic development in the area.   Project Manager Bill Dryden, P.E.  Engineer Steger Bizzell      Element Status / Issues  Design Complete  Environmental/  Archeological  Included with PS&E.  Rights of Way Awaiting property to be acquired for water quality pond.    Utility Relocations Utility relocations either complete or are part of the construction contract.  Construction Upon acquisition of property for water quality pond.  Other Issues It was anticipated that the property for construct water quality pond would be  donated, but owner has some issues with the mortgage holder concerning  donation.  Property owner is seeking compensation.     Southwest Bypass Project  (SH 29 to RM 2243)  Project No. 5QC     TIP No. 14b  November 2014  Project Description   Develop a Design Schematic for the Southwest Bypass from Leander Road (RM  2243) to SH 29 and Construction Plans Specifications and Estimate (PS&E) for the  construction of approximately 1.3 miles of 2‐lane interim roadway with bridges  from Leander Road to its intersection with Wolf Ranch Parkway Extension (TIP  Project No. 14A.  Purpose This project is identified as needed in the OTP and GTEC TIP.  This project, in  coordination with Wolf Ranch Parkway Extension, will provide access from  Leander Road to DB Wood Road south of SH 29, allowing alternate access from  southwest to west areas of the City, relieving the increasing traffic demand along  the IH 35 corridor.   Project Manager Bill Dryden, P.E.  Engineer HDR Engineering, Inc.      Element Status / Issues  Design Engineer has completed the project PS&E, less construction contract documents  and environmental permitting required at time of actual construction.  Environmental/  Archeological  Draft Report detailing the environmental, geotechnical and historical issues has  been completed and submitted to the Williamson County Conservation  Foundation for determination of issues to be mitigated.  Rights of Way We have reached agreement with the representative of the Guy/Knight  properties.  ROW Acquisition process moving to condemnation for the Weir  Trust  properties.  Appraisals have been updated.  Wolf  property – Acquisition complete.  Utility Relocations None identified at this time.  Construction TBD  Other Issues None    Wolf Ranch Parkway Extension  Project  (SW Bypass to DB Wood Road)  Project No. 5QV     TIP No. 14a  November 2014  Unchanged  Project Description   Design Schematic and Plans Specifications & Estimate for the construction of a  roadway from Southwest Bypass (TIP Project # 14B) to DB Wood Road south of  SH 29.  The project is planned as a major arterial.  Purpose This project is identified as needed in the OTP and the TIP.  This project, in  coordination with Southwest Bypass (#14B), will provide access from Leander  Road to DB Wood Road south of SH 29, allowing alternate access from southwest  to west areas of the City, relieving the increasing traffic demand along the IH‐35  corridor.  Project Manager Bill Dryden, P.E.  Engineer HDR, Engineering, Inc.       Element Status / Issues  Design Engineer is completing the fencing plans, its required environmental clearance  documents (to determine the fee for WCCF) and the construction PS&E bidding  package.  Environmental/  Archeological  Final report concerning the environmental, geotechnical and historical issues has  been submitted for review.  Rights of Way Complete.   Utility Relocations None identified at this time.  Construction Future  Other Issues Fencing may not be required with the purchase of the property by Hillwood  Development.    Current Capital Improvement Projects TIP No. Project No. Update On Schedule/ Or Behind Project Budget Project Cost Available Current Year Projected Current Year Cost Current Year Available Lakeway Drive Overpass #10 5QL Project Complete. Complete 2,500,000 2,500,000 0 0 0 Southeast Arterial 1 (Sam Houston Avenue)#12 5QG Project Complete. Complete 12,995,625 10,478,499 2,517,126 0 0 Wolf Ranch Parkway Extension (SW Bypass to DB Wood Road) #14A 5QW Engineer is completing the fencing plans, its required environmental clearance documents (to determine the fee for WCCF) and the construction PS&E bidding package. ROW has been acquired. On Schedule Unchanged 1,330,000 1,111,233 218,767 283,350 0 283,350 Southwest Bypass (SH29 to RR2243)#14B 5QC Engineer has completed the project PS&E, less construction contract documents and environmental permitting required at time of actual construction. We have reached agreement with the representative of the Guy/Knight properties. ROW Acquisition process moving to condemnation for the Weir Trust properties. Appraisals have been updated. Wolf property – Acquisition complete. On Schedule Unchanged 7,756,432 3,225,132 4,531,300 4,539,107 5,787 4,533,320 Northwest Blvd Overpass #QQ 5QX Engineer has presented the Preliminary Engineering Report and has begun final PS&E design efforts. Engineer is developing ROW strip map and In-process Unchanged 1,136,178 1,099,076 37,102 571,178 479,588 91,590 NB Frontage Road (SS 158 to Lakeway)#QQ 5QY Staff and Engineer has met with TxDOT personnel at both the local Area Office and District Environmental Division. In-process Unchanged 613,822 613,822 0 382,822 382,822 0 ROW - 1460 #EEa #EEb #EEc 5RB Construction scheduled to begin in February 2015. Utility coordination on-going as ROW is acquired. All appraisals are complete. Final offers have been made for all ROW parcels. The paperwork has been filed for all parcels requiring condemnation. As of October 16th, the City has obtained Possession and Use Agreements or have closings planned within the next couple weeks for all the remaining FM 1460 parcels. Utility Relocation Agreements were approved by Council at its October 28th meeting On Schedule 11,788,230 5,348,470 6,439,760 6,727,539 2,315,896 4,411,643 TCS/RR Easement 5RD Project Complete. Complete 1,500,000 1,503,148 -3,148 0 0 FM 971 / Washam 5RE Project Complete. Complete 100,000 0 100,000 0 0 Rivery Road 5RF Project Complete. Complete 779,000 29,000 750,000 750,000 0 750,000 Rivery Boulevard 5RM Engineer shall develop the ROW Map, acquire ROW, address potential environmental issues and complete construction PS&E in anticipation of future funding availability. On Schedule Snead Drive 5QZ PS&E is complete; Awaiting ROW for water quality pond. On Schedule Unchanged 825,100 87,000 738,100 825,100 87,000 738,100 Mays Street Extension 5RI Engineering has submitted the proposed alignment and is working on the 30%PS&E. On Schedule Unchanged 196,000 196,000 0 196,000 196,000 0 IH 35/ Hwy 29 Intersection 5RJ TBD 650,000 0 650,000 650,000 0 650,000 GTEC PROJECT UPDATE AND STATUS REPORT November 2014 Project to Date Current Year Budget (13/14) L:\Global\CIP Agenda Form\GTEC Status Report\2014\GTEC - Project Status - 2014-11.xlsx Page 1 of 2 11/12/2014 GTEC PROJECT UPDATE AND STATUS REPORT November 2014 Current Economic Development Projects Project Type Update On Schedule/ Or Behind Project Budget Project Cost Available Current Year Budget Current Year Cost Current Year Available Economic Development Projects 1,137,500 1,137,500 1,137,500 0 1,137,500 16,062,596 3,467,093 12,595,503 Project to Date Current Year Budget (13/14) L:\Global\CIP Agenda Form\GTEC Status Report\2014\GTEC - Project Status - 2014-11.xlsx Page 2 of 2 11/12/2014 Austin Avenue – Bridge Evaluations  (North and South San Gabriel Rivers)  Project No. TBD     TIP Project No. N/A  November 2014  Project Description Evaluate the repairs necessary to restore full structural capacity to the Austin Avenue  bridges over the North and South San Gabriel Rivers.  The process will involve several  phases – I) determination of testing needed, II) structural testing, analyses and  evaluation of test data to determine/recommend corrective measures and a project  budget, III) develop construction plans, specifications and contract documents,  estimates of probable construction costs and, last, IV) construction administration.  Purpose To extend the structural life of the two bridge and provide long‐term vehicular  capacity and pedestrian safety along Austin Avenue.  Project Manager Bill Dryden, P.E.  Engineer Aguirre & Fields, LP    Element Status / Issues  Design Staff met with Engineer and discussed potential courses of action.  There are four basic  paths to consider:  Do Nothing.  Short Term Temporary Fix.  Medium Term Fix.  Replace  Structure.  Engineer has developed 2 potential conceptual alignments for the proposed  reconstruction of the bridge. Surveying  TBD  Environmental TBD during Phase II  Rights of Way Prop. ROW from 3rd Street to N. of 2nd; Exist. ROW from N. of 2nd to Morrow Street.  Utility Reloc’ns TBD (future)  Construction TBD  Other Issues Candidate project for May 2015 Bond Program election;  Project submitted for CAMPO funding;  Project eligible for TxDOT Off‐System Bridge Replacement Program.    FM 971 at Austin Avenue  Realignment Intersection Improvements  Project No. 1BZ     TIP No. QQ1  November 2014  Unchanged  Project Description Design and preparation of final plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E) for the widening  and realignment of FM 971 at Austin Avenue, eastward to Gann Street.  Purpose To provide a new alignment consistent with the alignment of the proposed Northwest  Boulevard Bridge over IH 35; to allow a feasible, alternate route from the west side go IH 35  to Austin Avenue, to Georgetown High School and a more direct route to SH 130.  Project Managers Bill Dryden, P.E.  Engineer Klotz Associates, Inc.    Element Status / Issues  Design Preliminary Engineering complete;   Engineer working on 60% design submittal  Environmental/  Archeological  10/2015  Rights of Way Complete  Utility Relocations TBD  Construction 10/2016  Other Issues Working with TxDOT to develop an Advance Funding Agreement for plans review  and construction administration.    FM 971 at Austin Avenue  Improvements in San Gabriel Park  Project No. 1BZ     TIP No. QQ1  November 2014  Project Description Design of final plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E) for the moving of all park  amenities from the new FM 971 ROW.  Purpose To clear the ROW of park amenities and allow TxDOT review of the PS&E. Project Managers Bill Dryden, P.E.  Engineer Klotz Associates, Inc.    Element Status / Issues  Design Complete  Environmental/  Archeological  N/A  Rights of Way Complete  Utility Relocations Complete  Construction Ongoing  Other Issues Contractor has defaulted.  Surety has proposed a replacement contractor and  Legal and Systems Staff have accepted the proposal; terms being finalized.     FM 1460  Quail Valley Drive to University Drive  Project No. 5RB     TIP No. EEa, EEb & EEc  November 2014  Project Description Design and preparation of plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E) for the widening and  reconstruction of FM 1460.  Project will include review and update to existing Schematic,  Right‐of‐Way Map and Environmental Document and completion of the PS&E for the  remaining existing roadway.  Purpose To keep the currently approved environmental documents active; purchase ROW, effect  utility relocations/clearance and to provide on‐the‐shelf PS&E for TxDOT letting not later  than August 2013, pending available construction funding.  Project Managers Ed Polasek, AICP and Bill Dryden, P.E.  Engineer Brown and Gay Engineers, Inc.      Element Status / Issues  Design Complete  Environmental/  Archeological  Complete  Rights of Way As of October 16th, the City has obtained Possession  and Use Agreements or have closings planned within  the next couple weeks for all the remaining FM 1460  parcels.  Acquired: 31  Pending: 3  Condemnation: 2  Total: 36  Utility Relocations Ongoing as ROW is being acquired.  Construction Bid opened August 2014  Construction scheduled to commence February 2015.  Other Issues None Pending    Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit  November 2014  Unchanged  Project Description Develop a multi‐year implementation plan based on existing and cost effective  future storm water management practices in order to comply with the Texas  Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) Municipal Separate Storm  Sewer System (MS4) Permit.  Purpose On December 11, 2013, the TCEQ adopted rules for newly regulated MS4s  based on the 2010 Census designation of Urbanized Areas.  The City of  Georgetown is now part of Austin Large Urban Area based on those  designations.  Our 180 days to submit the Notice of Intent (NOI) and Storm  water Management Plan (SWMP) began on December 11, 2013.  The City of  Georgetown (City) hired HDR Engineering, Inc. (Engineer) to assist the City  with development of its Storm Water Management Program (SWMP) as a  result of the Cityʹs 2013 designation as a MS4 operator.  Initial services  included a review of available storm water program and water quality  information, a series of meetings with City departments and a City facility  review.  Permit submittal deadline to the TCEQ was June 11, 2014.  Project Managers Nat Waggoner, PMP®  Engineer/Engineers HDR, Inc.     Task Status / Issues  Initiation Scope of Services negotiations February 2014 – Completed    Planning February/March 2014 – Completed  Execution  Review and recommendation to Council by GTAB May 9, 2013 –   Completed   Adoption by Council May 27, 2014 – Completed   Submittal to TCEQ June 11, 2014 – Completed  Monitoring Public Notice of TCEQ Preliminary Determination‐ Received August 25, 2014  Comment period ended without significant input from the public. ~  September 25, 2014 – Completed    A copy and an affidavit of the publication of notice(s) was filed with  the Chief Clerk ~  September 19, 2014 – Completed   Year 1 began October 1, 2014 and ends October 1, 2015.  End of year  report is due in December 2015.  Other Issues None    N Austin Avenue Sidewalk Improvements  Rec Center to Georgetown High School  Project No. 1CV     TIP No. None  November 2014  Project Description Design and preparation of final plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E) for the sidewalk  improvements along N. Austin Avenue between the Georgetown Recreational Center and  Georgetown High School.  Purpose To provide a safe pedestrian route along North Austin avenue.  Project Managers Bill Dryden, P.E.  Engineer URS Corporation    Element Status / Issues  Design Complete  Environmental/  Archeological  Complete  Rights of Way None  Utility Relocations None  Construction Construction approximately 85% complete.  Other Issues None pending.    Overall Transportation Plan Update  November 2014  Project  Description  The updated OTP is a continuation of the effort that the City completed in 2004  with the adoption of the initial OTP.  That document provided an analysis of  existing conditions and travel characteristics, a refined area‐wide travel demand  model, review of the City’s roadway functional classification system and a revised  Thoroughfare Plan.  Project Managers Ed Polasek, AICP, Bill Dryden, P.E., and Nat Waggoner, PMP®  Engineer Klotz Associates, Inc.    Element Status / Issues  Key  Accomplishments  • 2012 roadway network update completed.  • 11 of 13 project elements completed. Final two elements (Chapters 8 and 9) are  under review and are nearly complete.  • OTP Chapter 6 has been updated to include 2014 Sidewalk Master Plan and  Park’s Trails Master Plan by reference.  Upcoming Tasks Staff:  • Is working to complete its final internal review by November 15th.  • Will present the DRAFT OTP to GTAB for its review and comments January  9th.  • Will present the DRAFT OTP to P&Z for its review and comments January 20th. • Will compile all comments and present the FINAL DRAFT OTP to GTAB  February 13th for its recommendation to Council.   • Will present the Final DRAFT OTP to Council February 24th for Public  Hearing and 1st Reading of Ordinance adopting the OTP.  • Will present 2nd Reading of Ordinance adopting the OTP March 10th.  Issues Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO) has not yet adopted  the 2040 Regional Transportation Plan nor the 2010 Travel Demand Model  supporting that plan.  Once adopted, the 2040 plan and model will provide key  data which will allow supporting jurisdictions the opportunity to update their  transportation plans.  Georgetown transportation planning efforts will benefit from  updated modeling data and should pursue funding to update the 2012 data  currently informing the OTP.    Sidewalk Master Plan and Public Facility Access Audit  November 2014  Purpose The purpose of the City of Georgetown Sidewalk Study and Public Facility Access  Audit is to inventory existing public infrastructure within the City of Georgetown  City Limits, identify design and compliance deficiencies, evaluate future program  requirements, and develop a long term implementation plan.   Project Manager Nat Waggoner, PMP®  Engineer HDR, Inc.  Task Status / Issues  Initiation ‐ Task 1.3 – Project Kick Off Meeting completed May 15, 2014.  Planning ‐ Task 5.2 – Project Prioritization   Execution ‐ Schedule of Deliverables   Task Name Start End   ADA Reporting Criteria for Sidewalk Analysis May‐14 Jun‐14  Comprehensive Review of Existing Studies, Plans, and Reports May‐14 Jun‐14  Self‐Assessment Survey of Downtown District May‐14 Jul‐14  Data Collection and Field Inventory Jun‐14 Aug‐14  City Facilities Survey Jul‐14 Sep‐14  Sidewalk Implementation Plan and Project Prioritization May‐14 Oct‐14 Ongoing Parks and Amenities Survey  Oct‐14 Nov‐14 Ongoing Government and Public Stakeholder Meetings May‐14 Jan‐15 Public Meetings and Hearings Periodic thru Mar‐15 ADA Transition Plan Update to Council Targeting Mar‐15   Other Notes ADA   NOV – Transition Plan amendment planning audit by Altura Solutions   DEC – RAS review & recommended revision complete   JAN – Staff input complete   FEB – Boards, Commissions and Council review   MAR – Adoption  Project Website   Launched July 15, 2014  Open House #2   January 21, 2015, Location TBD  Total City Needs Opinion of Probable Cost  NEW SIDEWALK $240,042,984 NEW CURB RAMPS $21,052,076 NON‐FUNCTIONAL SIDEWALK REPAIRS $1,407,014 LIMITED FAILURE SIDEWALK REPAIRS $429,686 NON‐FUNCTIONAL RAMP REPAIRS $2,059,708 FUNCTIONAL RAMP REPAIRS $4,759,413 PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL UPGRADES $1,217,160 $270,968,042     Smith Branch  November 2014  Project Description Voluntary acquisition of eight (8) properties with finished floor elevations below  the base flood elevation in the Smith Branch Watershed  Purpose To reduce future flood damage risk for homes below the 100‐year floodplain  elevation.  Project Managers Wesley Wright, P.E., and Terri Calhoun, SR/WA, R/W‐NAC  Engineer Kasberg, Patrick, & Associates (Flood Study)/Spitzer & Associates (Real Estate)      Element Status / Issues  Design Completed – Flood Study completed in 2013 Environmental/  Archeological  Minor asbestos on one sink.  Property  Acquisition  GTAB and Council approved counter‐offers on all eight (8)  properties.  Contracts are signed.  This is a willing buyer –  willing seller program and all identified properties are being  acquired.    Seven properties have closed as of 11/06.  The final property  will close in mid‐November.  Asbestos analysis on the 7 acquired properties returned only  one sink requiring special attention.  Staff is preparing a bid for demolition services and will bring it  forward in December or January.  In the meantime, staff will  reach out to Habitat for Humanity to see if any materials can be  salvaged for their efforts.  Acquired: 7 Pending: 1 Condemnation: 0  Total: 8 Utility Relocations Will require termination of services – ongoing with each property closing.  Construction Upon acquisition of properties, structures will be demolished and the lot returned to  grass.  Other Issues None Pending    Southeast Inner Loop Corridor Study  (IH 35 to Rockride Lane)  Project No. None     Project No. None  November 2014  Project Description   Develop preliminary design schematic alternatives, perform preliminary  engineering and prepare an engineering report for the Southeast Inner Loop  Schematic Design from IH 35 to Rockride Lane (CR 110) and Sam Houston Avenue.  Purpose To determine ultimate alignment, interim and ultimate engineer’s estimates of  probable project costs and ROW needs for the future SH 29 Bypass, connecting the  westerly route (SH 29 to IH 35) with Southeast Inner Loop and Sam Houston  Avenue.  Project Manager Bill Dryden, P.E.  Engineer Kasberg Patrick and Associates      Element Status / Issues  Design Draft Final Report and Alignment were presented to GTAB in September; and  were forwarded to Council with a unanimous recommendation of the Board for  adoption.  Surveying  TBD (future)  Environmental/  Archeological  TBD (future)  Rights of Way To be conceptually established during the preliminary schematic phase and further  refined through the design phases.  Utility Relocations TBD (future)  Construction TBD (future)  Other Issues Staff has met with the public sector stakeholders (City, TxDOT and WilCo) and their  various engineering firms working along the Southwest Bypass/SE Inner Loop  connection and the I 35 corridor.    Southwest Bypass Project   (RM 2243 to IH 35)  Project No. 1CA     Project No. 14c  November 2014  Unchanged  Project Description   Develop a Design Schematic for the Southwest Bypass from Leander Road (RM 2243) to IH  35 in the ultimate configuration and Construction Plans, Specifications and Estimate (PS&E)  for construction of approximately 1.5 miles of interim 2‐lane roadway from Leander Road  (RM 2243) to its intersection with the existing Inner Loop underpass at IH 35.  The portion  from Leander Road to the east property line of Texas Crushed Stone is a GTAB Project; from  the east line to the existing Inner Loop underpass at IH 35 is being funded by GTEC.  Purpose To extend an interim portion of the SH 29 Bypass, filling in between Leander Road (RM  2243) to IH 35 Southbound Frontage Road.  Project Manager Williamson County  City Contact: Ed Polasek, AICP and Bill Dryden, P.E.  Engineer HDR, Inc.      Element Status / Issues  Design Engineer is in preliminary engineering and schematic design phase of the facility.  Alignment has been presented to staff and management.  Surveying  City stall met with the Surveyor to resolve a conflict in the proposed ROW to be  acquired from Texas Crushed Stone.  Environmental/  Archeological  TBD by preliminary engineering phase.  Rights of Way Conceptually established by the Industrial Agreement; will be refined through the  schematic design phase.  Negotiations ongoing for the remainder of the ROW  Utility Relocations TBD (future)  Construction This project included in the Williamson County 2013 Bond Program to construct 2  lanes of the ultimate roadway.  Other Issues None    Transit Study  as Requested by City Council   Project No. None     Project No. None  November 2014  Unchanged  Project  Description    Council Motion:  Discussion and possible direction to the City of Georgetownʹs Transportation  Advisory Board (GTAB) to conduct an analysis and make a recommendation to the City Council  no later than June 24, 2014 ,regarding the Cityʹs potential future participation in State and  Regional Transportation Organizations including the benefits, conditions, and justification which  would prompt the Cityʹs participation in Project Connect, Lone Star Rail and any other relevant  State and Regional Transportation Organizations that the City should be involved with ‐‐ Steve  Fought, Councilmember, District 4  Amended Motion:  1. The City Manager to determine what time and effort staff have available to conduct this type  of study over the next year.  If it is not in the Transportation Division, Planning Department,  Finance Department and/or City Manager’s Office work program, as outlined in the current  draft budget, can it be adequately staffed to complete this level of work over the next year?  2. Is the challenge to research Federal, State and Regional transportation organizations or is it  transit programs?  This direction to staff is assuming it is transit programs.  3. Narrow the specific analysis to programs that are actually authorized to receive Federal  formula and discretionary funding programs found within the current Federal Transit  Administration.  However, that would narrow the field down to three agencies or programs.   Capital Metro, Lone Star Rail and the State of Texas through the Texas Department of  Transportation.  CARTS is only a contractor to Capital Metro and provides certain 5310  transit opportunities to persons outside of the Capital Metro Service Area in our jurisdiction.   CAMPO, Project Connect, Project Connect North and My35 are simply planning programs  that include staff from Capital Metro, Lone Star Rail District, and TxDOT and  representatives from local governments.  4. The analysis should be based on how those planning programs will lead to funding through  the project delivery agencies.  (Fought amended to include financial risk and benefits to the City)  5. The Council should provide the Board and staff specifics on what type of economic analysis  data will lead to an ultimate decision by the City Council.  6. Finally, some people ‘can’t see what the final project would look like’ or ‘can’t see what a  Transit Oriented Development would look like.’  Years ago, when the City was looking at  transportation options and creating a TOD ordinance, there was a field trip to perform some  on the ground research.  Members of the City Council, Planning and Zoning, and staff  (GTAB was not in existence at the time) went and stayed at a TOD to see for themselves.   We should have at least one field trip during this study.  Since it has been about 8 years or  so since that first and only field trip, it should be extremely informative to do it again and  see what a TOD looks like today and how the project has performed over the years.  Vote on the original motion as amended: Approved (6‐1) (Hesser opposed)    Project  Manager  Ed Polasek, AICP  Engineer TBD  Project Status Workplan Under Development    Transportation Services Operations   CIP Maintenance  November 2014  Project Description 2012/13‐2014 CIP Maintenance of roadways including, Chip seal, Cutler  Overlays, Fog seal applications and Engineering design of future rehabilitation  projects.  Purpose To provide protection and maintain an overall pavement condition index of  85%.  Project Manager Mark Miller  Engineer/Engineers KPA, Steger Bizzell, Halff Assoc.  Task Status / Issues  2nd and 6th Street  Engineering  (Halff)  2nd at Austin Avenue intersection improvement along with 6th Street.  (Austin Ave. to Rock) (Smith Contracting) 2nd and 6th Street. (paved November  3rd)  Project nearing completion.  (KPA) 2nd St to College St plans are complete.  Advertising for bid in mid‐ December with construction to begin in January.  9th Street  (Main to Rock)  (KPA) (Patin Construction)  Austin to Rock closed for utility work and  reconstruction with opening to traffic by end of November.  Main to Austin  portion scheduled to begin in early December.   Chip Seal  Complete    2015 projects to be determined and recommended for  engineering by January.  Fog Seal Complete.  In‐house fog sealing currently under way with new Etnyre  Distributor.  Cutler/overlay Complete.  Pavement  Evaluation  KPA Engineering: pavement evaluation/scoring and update of 5 year CIP  reflecting changes under way.  Staff is working with Fugro to compare data  with conditions and to begin packaging CIP maintenance projects with  available funding.      City of Georgetown, Texas SUBJECT: Presentation of Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation monthly financial report for October 2014. Micki Rundell, Chief Financial Officer, COG, Finance Manager GTEC ITEM SUMMARY: The Bylaws of GTEC (Article V, Section 6.02) require the Finance Manager to report the financial activity of the Corporation to the Board. · Budgetary report · Sales Tax revenues · Any other relevant financial information Sales tax is received two months in arrears; therefore the revenues reflect only the amount received, not actually earned, as of the report date. A report on payments made to vendors for the month of October is also included. FINANCIAL IMPACT: n/a SUBMITTED BY: ATTACHMENTS: Description Type financials Backup Material City of Georgetown, Texas SUBJECT: Presentation and discussion of the 2015 Transportation Bond Committee initial project list.- Nat Waggoner, Transportation Analyst, Tom Crawford, Bond Committee Chair, Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Transportation Services Director. ITEM SUMMARY: 7 citizens at large and 7 members of the Georgetown Transportation Advisory Board (GTAB) began meeting in June to discuss the City's transportation needs. The committee is presenting their initial findings to GTEC and will incorporate feedback into the committee's final recommendation and future presentations to City Council. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None SUBMITTED BY: Nat Waggoner, PMP® City of Georgetown, Texas SUBJECT: Consideration and possible action to approve minutes from the regular GTEC Board meeting held October 15, 2014. Jim Briggs, General Manager - GTEC ITEM SUMMARY: Board to review the minutes from the meeting held on October 15, 2014 and revise or approve. FINANCIAL IMPACT: n/a SUBMITTED BY: Jana Kern ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Draft Minutes Backup Material Minutes of the Meeting of Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation and the Governing Body of the City of Georgetown, Texas Wednesday, October 15, 2014 The Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation of the City of Georgetown, Texas, met on Wednesday, October 15, 2014. Board Members Present: John Hesser – Vice President, Jerry Hammerlun - Secretary, Johnny Anderson, Leo Wood Board Members Absent: Jesus Moulinet, Bill Connor - President, Tommy Gonzalez Staff Present: Paul Brandenburg, Micki Rundell, Ed Polasek, Jana Kern, Bill Dryden, Bridget Chapman, Wes Wright, La’Mar Kemp Others Present: Tom Crawford – Chair of 2015 Road Bond Committee, Randy Mongold – San Gabriel Project Management, Mark Epperly – Halff Associates Minutes Regular Session (This Regular Session may, at any time, be recessed to convene and Executive Session for any purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code 551.) A. Call to Order Mr. John Hesser called the regular GTEC Board meeting to order on Wednesday, October 15, 2014 at 3:32 PM The Board may, at any time, recess the Regular Session to convene in Executive Session at the President, A Board Member, The City Manager, Assistant City Manager, General Manager of Utilities, City Council Member, and/or legal counsel for any purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code Chapter 551, and are subject to action in the Regular Session that follows. B. Introduction of Visitors C. Industry/CAMPO/TXDOT Updates: CAMPO has not made any decision on the Austin Avenue Bridge funding from the STPMM program. They have gone to the local jurisdiction for the counties and asked for a list of priorities of local projects by county. The list came out and the Austin Avenue Bridges came out as a third rated project in Williamson County and FM 971 intersection project came out as the seventh rated. The finance committee will be meeting in the next couple of weeks and the final recommendation that will go before full CAMPO Policy Board in November. D. Discussion regarding the Project Progress Reports and Time Lines. – Bill Dryden, P.E., Transportation Engineer and Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Transportation Services Director Dryden updated the Board E. Presentation of Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation monthly financial report for September 2014. – Micki Rundell, Chief Financial Officer, COG, Finance Manager Rundell updated the Board Legislative Regular Agenda F. Consideration and possible action to approve minutes from the regular GTEC Board meeting held September 17, 2014. – Paul E. Brandenburg – General Manager, GTEC Motion by Anderson, second by Hammerlun to approve the minutes as presented. Approved unanimously 4-0 (Connor, Gonzalez & Moulinet absent) G. Consideration and possible action to authorize the City to enter into Standard Utility Agreements for the relocation of certain utilities which are in conflict with the proposed construction of FM 1460 Improvements Project from Quail Valley Drive to 0.5 mile north of University Boulevard as owned by Atmos Energy Corporation, Oncor Energy Delivery and Seminole Pipeline Company in the amount estimated to be $2,076,374.49, with 90% of that amount, $1,868,737.00, to be reimbursed by TxDOT for a net estimated cost to the City in the amount of $207,638.00. – Bill Dryden, P.E., Transportation Engineer, and Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Transportation Services Director. Dryden stated that the City entered into an Advance Funding Agreement (AFA) with TxDOT that provides a 90% reimbursement for the eligible utility relocation cost for the FM 1460 project. The engineer has identified three utility owners – Atmos Energy Corp., Oncor Energy Delivery and Seminole Pipeline Co. Question asked, answered by Dryden, GTEC will pay the $2,076,374.49 up front and then will be reimbursed all but $207,638.00. Yes, the $207,638.00 is the City’s 10% portion. Motion by Hammerlun, second by Anderson to enter into an Standard Utility Agreement with Atmos Energy Corp., Oncor Energy and Seminole Pipeline Co. Approved unanimously 4-0 (Connor, Gonzalez & Moulinet absent) H. Consideration and possible action to amend the budget for the Mays Street (Rabbit Hill Road) extension project extension as part of the South Georgetown Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone in an amount not to exceed $10,650,000 and setting a public hearing date –Edward G. Polasek, AICP Transportation Services Director and Micki Rundell, Chief Financial Officer. Polasek stated that this is the Mays Street extension (Rabbit Hill Rd extension) from Bass Pro Shop up to Westinghouse Rd. in Georgetown. The City has created the South Georgetown Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone (TIRZ) for the purpose of providing public infrastructure necessary for economic development of these properties along Westinghouse Rd. in Georgetown. This access will open up several properties to the cross over traffic from Bass Pro Shop and will improve mobility around Westinghouse corridor. Staff is recommending the allocation of the $10,650,000.00 4B funding for the Mays St. Extension project, and to set a public hearing date for November 19, 2014. Also, staff will bring to this Board funding agreements with the TIRZ and the City of Round Rock for their portions of the roadway. Motion by Hammerlun, second by Wood to initiate the budget amendment process for $10,650,000.00 and to set a public hearing for November 19, 2014. Approved unanimously 4-0 (Connor, Gonzalez & Moulinet absent) I. Consideration and possible action to amend the budget for the Pecan Center economic development project that will include street improvements at the Airport Road/Lakeway Drive intersection, along Airport Road and an internal collector (Pecan Center Drive) that will eventually connect to Aviation Drive in an amount not to exceed $6,500,000 and setting a public hearing date – Edward G. Polasek, AICP Transportation Services Director and Micki Rundell, CFO. Polasek stated that the next item (J) is where you do the findings to find the project eligible. This item is where you initiate budget amendment process and set a public hearing date of November 19, 2014. At the last meeting we had a detailed presentation of this project, the options, and the implementation strategy. Staff is asking for a budget amendment for the full amount of construction - $6,500,000.00. Also, there will be an additional $350,000.00 that would include a full stormwater pond, storm drain system, for the internal roadways of Pecan Center Dr. Staff is requesting a budget amendment of $6,500,000.00 plus $350,000.00 for a total of $6,850,000.00 and to set the public hearing date. Motion by Wood, second by Hammerlun to amend the budget by $6,850,000.00 and set the Public hearing for November 19, 2014. Approved unanimously 4-0 (Connor, Gonzalez & Moulinet absent) J. Presentation and discussion of the Findings Process required for the addition of three (3) projects in the 2014/2015 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). – Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Transportation Services Director and Nat Waggoner, PMP® Polasek stated that from the completed findings it was determined that each of the three projects is eligible for 4B funding. The next step is for the legal motion to be read for the record. Motion by Hammerlun second by Anderson that the Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Board, following guidelines provided by the City Attorney, finds Transportation Project PC1 (Pecan Center Dr. from Lakeway Dr. to the Moore tract), Project PC 2 (Intersection of Lakeway Dr. and Airport Rd.), Project PC 3 (Airport Rd. from Lakeway Dr. North to 9956 feet south of Berry Creek Dr.) eligible for 4B funding, as each project (1) conforms to the ballot language establishing the sales tax; (2) constitutes one or more costs authorized by statute; and (3) is one or more of the types of project(s) authorized by statute, documents by the GTEC Board Ranking of Eligibility: Ranking Summary completed in September 2014. Approved unanimously 4- 0 (Connor, Gonzalez & Moulinet absent) Adjournment Motion by Anderson second by Hammerlun to adjourn meeting. Meeting adjourned at 4:30 PM. Approved unanimously 4-0 (Connor, Gonzalez & Moulinet absent) Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 4:30 PM. Approved: Attest: _______________________ ________________________ John Hesser - Vice President Jerry Hammerlun– Secretary _________________________ Jana R. Kern – Board Liaison City of Georgetown, Texas SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING by the Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation (GTEC) regarding the expenditure of 4B sales tax funds for the adopted 2014/15 Budget. - Micki Rundell, Chief Financial Officer, COG Finance Manager, GTEC ITEM SUMMARY: State Law requires GTEC to provide public notice and hold a public hearing on the proposed projects to be funded with the 4B sales tax. The required notice was published in the Williamson County Sun on November 12, 2014. The public hearing will be conducted by the GTEC Board of Directors. FINANCIAL IMPACT: n/a SUBMITTED BY: ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Public Hearing Notice Backup Material City of Georgetown, Texas SUBJECT: Discussion and possible action regarding amending the 2014/15 GTEC Budget for new projects for 2014/15. Micki Rundell, Chief Financial Officer, COG, Finance Manager, GTEC ITEM SUMMARY: 14/15 budget to be amended due to new developer projects being accepted. 14/15 budget Mays Street (Rabbit Hill Road) $ 10,650,000 Pecan Center Drive 6,850,000 COMMENTS: A roll forward budget amendment for projects in process at September 30, 2014 will be brought for consideration in January 2015. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Both projects will be funded with bond proceeds. The bonds will be issued in 2015 as part of the City’s normal spring bond issuance cycle. The Mays Street project will be reimbursed over time from the Georgetown South TIRZ. SUBMITTED BY: ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Budget Exhibit City of Georgetown, Texas SUBJECT: Consideration and possible action to approve an Amended Performance Agreement for the Summit at Rivery project. - Bridget Chapman, City Attorney, Micki Rundell, CFO, and Jim Briggs, Interim City Manger ITEM SUMMARY: This item is an amendment to the previously approved Performance Agreement for the Summit at Rivery Park. On November 20, 2013, GTEC approved a performance agreement for up to $750,000 of reimbursable road improvements for the development of a hotel/conference center at the Summit at Rivery Park site. These improvements are necessary to promote or develop new or expanded business and comply with the GTEC ballot language and State statues. The original agreement had a project construction deadline of December 31, 2015. Due to owner related delays in the project, the original completion date must be extended. This Amendment revises the construction deadline for the project to June 30, 2016. COMMENTS: This is a “reimbursement” agreement, meaning funds will not be paid until completion of the project in 2016 therefore; the funding will be included in the 2015/16 GTEC Annual Budget. FINANCIAL IMPACT: n/a SUBMITTED BY: ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Performance Agreement Backup Material First Amended and Restated GTEC Performance Agreement The Summit at Rivery Park Page 1 of 27 GEORGETOWN TRANSPORTATION § FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED § ENHANCEMENT CORPORATION § PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT § CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS § THE SUMMIT AT RIVERY PARK This FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is between NOVAK BROTHERS, LLC, a Texas limited liability company, whose mailing address is 201 Adams Street, Georgetown, Texas 78628 (“Developer”), the GEORGETOWN TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT CORPORATION, a Texas non-profit corporation, whose mailing address is 113 E. 8th Street, Georgetown, Texas 78626 (“GTEC”), and the CITY OF GEORGETOWN, a Texas Home Rule municipality, whose making address is 113 E. 8th Street, Georgetown, Texas 78626 (the “City”). Developer, GTEC and the City are referred to collectively in this Agreement as “the Parties.” WHEREAS, the Parties are parties to that certain “Performance Agreement” approved by the City Council of the City on December 10, 2014 (the “Original Performance Agreement”); WHEREAS, Developer has requested that that the definition of the term “Construction Deadline” as set forth in the Original Performance Agreement be revised from December 31, 2015 to June 30, 2016, and GTEC and the City have no objections to amending the Original Agreement to so state; WHEREAS, Brae Group Ltd., a Texas limited partnership, is the owner of a 31.319-acre portion of the Property (defined herein) shown by sketch on Exhibit A; WHEREAS, Novak Brothers Texas Brownstones, LLC, a Texas limited liability company, is the owner of a 0.613-acre portion of the Property shown by sketch on Exhibit A; WHEREAS, the Property is the subject of several other agreements by or among some or all of the Parties pursuant to which the Property is to be developed with new business enterprises – specifically, the Hotel (defined herein) and the Conference Center (defined herein) – and with other improvements such as the Public Parking Garage (defined herein), residential townhomes, apartments, and other uses as may be allowed under the zoning ordinances applicable to the Property; First Amended and Restated GTEC Performance Agreement The Summit at Rivery Park Page 2 of 27 WHEREAS, GTEC is a Type B economic development corporation created in 2001 pursuant to the predecessor statute of Chapter 505 of the Texas Local Government Code; WHEREAS, the ballot language from the May 2001 election at which the Type B sales tax was approved provided as follows: The adoption of an additional sales and use tax within the City at the rate of one half (1/2) of one percent as authorized by Section 4B, Article 5190.6, V.T.C.S., as amended, with the proceeds thereof to be used for and applied for project costs for streets, roads, drainage and other related transportation system improvements, including the payment of maintenance and operating expenses associated with such authorized projects. WHEREAS, if consistent with the ballot language, GTEC is authorized to finance “projects” as that term is defined in various sections of Chapters 501 and 505 of the Texas Local Government Code; WHEREAS, Section 501.103 of the Texas Local Government Code, in pertinent part, defines the term "project" to mean "expenditures that are found by the board of directors [of the economic development corporation] to be required or suitable for infrastructure necessary to promote or develop new or expanded business enterprises, limited to: (1) streets and roads, rail spurs, water and sewer utilities, electric utilities, or gas utilities, drainage, site improvements, and related improvements; (2) telecommunications and Internet improvements ; or (3) beach remediation along the Gulf of Mexico;" WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of GTEC has found that the expenditure of GTEC funds to aid in the construction of the Public Roadways (herein defined) in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement is an expenditure that is required or suitable for infrastructure necessary to promote or develop new or expanded business enterprises (i.e., the Hotel and Conference Center) and development of the Property consistently with the Revised PUD Ordinance (defined herein) and the Related Documents (defined herein); WHEREAS, following notice and a public hearing on GTEC’s proposed financial participation in construction of the Public Roadways in the amount of the GTEC Share (defined herein), the GTEC Board of Directors determined that (1) expenditure of the GTEC Share for the Public Roadways is an expenditure that meets the definition of "project" as that term is defined Section 501.103 of the Texas Local Government Code; (2) the proposed expenditure of the GTEC Share for the Public Roadways meets the First Amended and Restated GTEC Performance Agreement The Summit at Rivery Park Page 3 of 27 definition of "cost" as that term is defined by Section 501.152 of the Texas Local Government Code; and (3) the GTEC Share is included in the GTEC budget, which has been approved by the City Council; WHEREAS, the Parties understand and agree that Section 501.073(a) of the Texas Local Government Code requires the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, to approve all programs and expenditures of GTEC, and accordingly this Agreement is not effective until City Council has approved this Agreement at a City Council meeting called and held for that purpose. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the agreements contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: SECTION 1. RECITALS INCORPORATED. The foregoing recitals are hereby found to be true and correct and are incorporated into the body of this Agreement by reference and shall be considered part of the mutual covenants, consideration and promises that bind the Parties. SECTION 2. TERM. This Agreement shall be effective as of the Effective Date and shall continue thereafter until all obligations of the Parties under this Agreement have been performed in full, unless terminated sooner in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. SECTION 3. DEFINITIONS. The following words shall have the following meanings when used in this Agreement. (a) Agreement. The word "Agreement" means this Performance Agreement, together with all Exhibits attached to this Agreement. (b) Applicable Laws. The words “Applicable Laws” mean and include all of the following: all federal, state and local laws, ordinances, orders, specifications, standards, and regulations pertaining to the development of the Property, including, without limitation, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality laws and rules for construction over the Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone; the City’s Code of Ordinances, Unified Development Code, Construction First Amended and Restated GTEC Performance Agreement The Summit at Rivery Park Page 4 of 27 Specifications and Standards, Drainage Criteria Manual, Building Codes, Fire Codes, Inspection Guidelines, and Development Manual; and the final City- approved construction plans and specifications for the Public Roadways, Hotel, Conference Center, and Public Parking Garage. (c) Board. The word “Board” means the Board of Directors of the Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation (GTEC). (d) Brae. The word “Brae” means BRAE GROUP, LTD., a Texas limited partnership whose general partner is Developer and whose mailing address is 201 Adams Street, Georgetown, Texas 78628, and Brae’s successors and assigns. (e) City. The word “City” means the City of Georgetown, Texas. (f) City Council. The words “City Council” mean the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas. (g) Conference Center. The words “Conference Center” mean the conference center to be constructed by Hines (defined herein) on the Property in the area shown on Exhibit B as “Zone B1,” having a ballroom at least 16,000 square feet in size, and being capable of hosting multiple small scale events constructed and operated pursuant to the applicable Related Documents. (h) Construction Deadline. The words “Construction Deadline” mean June 30, 2016. (i) Developer. The word “Developer” means Novak (defined herein). (j) Effective Date. The words "Effective Date" mean the latest date accompany the signatures lines of the Parties below. (k) Event of Default. The words "Event of Default" mean and include any of the Events of Default set forth below in the section of this Agreement entitled "Events of Default.” (l) "GTEC. The word "GTEC" means the GEORGETOWN TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT CORPORATION, a Texas non-profit corporation formed and operating under Chapter 505 of the Texas Local Government Code, its successors and assigns, whose corporate address for the purposes of this Agreement is 113 E. 8th Street, Georgetown, Texas 78626. First Amended and Restated GTEC Performance Agreement The Summit at Rivery Park Page 5 of 27 (m) GTEC Share. The words “GTEC Share” means an amount of Qualified Expenditures not to exceed SEVEN HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($750,000). (n) Hines. The word “Hines” means Hines Georgetown Hotel LLC, a Texas limited liability company whose address for purposes of this Agreement is 811 Main Street, Suite 4100, Houston, Texas 77002, and Hines’ successors and assigns. (o) Hotel. The word "Hotel" means an upscale hotel having at least 221-rooms and a AAA 3 Diamond Rating or a 2 Star Forbes Rating (based on the 2013 hotel rating systems) in the Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc. brand to be constructed by Hines on the Property in the area described on Exhibit B as “Zone B1” constructed and operated pursuant to the applicable Related Documents. (p) Novak or Developer. The words "Novak" or “Developer” mean NOVAK BROTHERS, LLC, a Texas limited liability corporation, whose mailing address is 201 Adams Street, Georgetown, Texas 78628, and Novak’s successors and assigns. (q) Property. The word "Property" means that certain real property consisting of 31.94 acres of land, more or less, in the City of Georgetown, Williamson County, Texas, which is bounded by IH-35 to the east, Rivery Blvd. to the south, and the San Gabriel River to the west and east and known locally as The Summit at Rivery Park and more specifically described by sketch on Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes. (r) Public Parking Garage. The words “Public Parking Garage” mean the multi- level above-ground public parking garage having at least 336 spaces to be constructed by Hines on the Property in the area described on Exhibit B as “Zone B1” constructed and operated pursuant to the applicable Related Documents. (s) Public Roadway(s). The words "Public Roadways" mean and include the improvements described below and further depicted on Exhibit C of this Agreement, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes: (1) the extension of Wolf Ranch Parkway from its current terminus at Rivery Blvd. to the proposed Woodlawn Avenue (approximately 350 linear feet); (2) that portion of the proposed Woodlawn Avenue in front of Block F, Lot 1 of the Final Plat for The Summit at Rivery Park, Phases 5 and 6 (approximately 500 linear feet); First Amended and Restated GTEC Performance Agreement The Summit at Rivery Park Page 6 of 27 (3) a new left turn lane from east bound Rivery Blvd. to the proposed extension for Wolf Ranch Parkway (approximately 200 linear feet); and (4) traffic signal reconstruction at the intersection of Rivery Blvd. and Wolf Ranch Parkway. Each of the foregoing four (4) improvements are referred to individually herein as a “Public Roadway” and collectively as the “Public Roadways.” The term Public Roadway(s) does not mean or include the landscaping, irrigation improvements, or other improvements that may be located within the medians or rights-of-way of the Public Roadway(s). (t) Qualified Expenditures. The words "Qualified Expenditures" mean those certain expenditures by Developer that meet all of the following criteria: (1) are associated with the construction of the Public Roadways (and no other improvements) and are described on Exhibit D, attached hereto, (2) meet the definitions of "project" as that term is defined in Section 501.103 of the Texas Local Government Code, (3) meet the definition of "cost" as that term is defined in Section 501.152 of the Texas Local Government Code; and (4) do not exceed the GTEC Share (regardless of the estimated costs shown on Exhibit D). (u) Reimbursement Conditions. The words “Reimbursement Conditions” mean and include each, every, and all of the following events: (1) With regard to the Public Roadways: (i) Developer has acquired rights from Brae to construct the Public Roadways on the Property ; (ii) the Public Roadways have been finally constructed in accordance with all Applicable Laws, this Agreement, and the Related Documents (defined herein); (iii) the City has issued Letters of Acceptance for the Public Roadways; and (iv) the City has approved the title commitment and form of deed required by Section 4(l) of this Agreement; and (2) the Hotel has been finally constructed in accordance with all Applicable Laws, this Agreement, and the Related Documents, a final Certificate of Occupancy has been issued by the City for the Hotel; and (3) the Conference Center has been finally constructed in accordance with all Applicable Laws, this Agreement, and the Related Documents, a final Certificate of Occupancy has been issued by the City for the Conference Center; and First Amended and Restated GTEC Performance Agreement The Summit at Rivery Park Page 7 of 27 (4) the Parkland Improvements (as that term is defined in the Parkland Improvements Agreement) have been finally constructed in accordance with all Applicable Laws, the Parkland Improvements Agreement, and the Related Documents, and accepted for maintenance by the City; and (5) the Public Parking Garage has been finally constructed in accordance with all Applicable Laws, this Agreement, and the Related Documents; the City has issued a final certificate of occupancy for the Public Parking Garage, a bill of sale and/or deed in a form acceptable to the City has been executed by the necessary parties transferring ownership of the Public Parking Garage to the City at no additional cost to the City and free and clear of all liens and other encumbrances; (6) all documentation substantiating the Reimbursement Request required by Section 5(c) of this Agreement has been submitted to and approved by the City and GTEC; and (7) Developer is has fully performed and complied with, and is not in default or breach of, any terms or conditions contained in this Agreement or any Related Document. (v) Related Documents. The words "Related Documents" mean and include, without limitation all of the ordinances and agreements pertaining to the Property, including but not limited to the following, as they may be amended from time to time: (1) the Memorandum of Understanding for the Hotel, Conference Center and Parking Garage at The Summit at Rivery Park dated May 14, 2013 between the City, Developer, and Hines Interests Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership and an affiliate of Hines; (2) the Parkland Improvement Agreement between the City and Brae effective June 26, 2013, as amended; (3) the Joint Use, Access and Lease Agreement between the City and Hines pertaining to the Public Parking Garage and the Conference Center, as amended; (4) the Tax Increment Financing Agreement between the City and Williamson County, as amended; First Amended and Restated GTEC Performance Agreement The Summit at Rivery Park Page 8 of 27 (5) City Ordinance No. 2007-91, as amended by Ordinance No. 2008-63, Ordinance No. 2010-30, and Ordinance No. 2013-55 relating to the Rivery Park Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone, as said ordinances may be amended from time to time; (6) City Ordinance No. 2013-54, being the revised Planned Unit Development Ordinance pertaining to zoning and development standards for the Property, as said ordinance may be amended from time to time; (7) the Performance Agreement between the Georgetown Economic Development Corporation (GEDCO), Developer, and Hines, as amended; (8) the Final Site Plan(s) approved by the City for the Property; (9) the Master Development Agreement between the City, Developer, and Hines pertaining to development of the Property, as amended; and (10) all promissory notes, loan agreements, and all other instruments and documents, whether now or hereafter existing, executed in connection with the Property. (w) Term. The word "Term" means the term of this Agreement as specified in Section 2 of this Agreement. SECTION 4. AFFIRMATIVE COVENANTS OF DEVELOPER. (a) Obtain Rights in Property. Developer shall cause Brae to transfer all rights, title and interest in the Property, or portions of the Pr operty, when and as are necessary for Developer to construct the Public Roadways in accordance with this Agreement. By the signature below of its duly authorized representative, Brae acknowledges and agrees that it has the obligation to timely transfer such rights, tile, and interest in the Property, or portions of the Property, to Developer so that Developer can comply with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Prior to requesting issuance of the Notice to Proceed pursuant to Section 4(d) of this Agreement, Developer shall provide the City with written documentation evidencing Developer’s right to construct the Public Roadways on the Property. (b) Duty to Construct. Developer shall construct or cause to be constructed the Public Roadways in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. Final completion of all of the Public Roadways by Developer and acceptance of same by the First Amended and Restated GTEC Performance Agreement The Summit at Rivery Park Page 9 of 27 City must occur not later than the Construction Deadline , subject to reasonable Force Majeure as set forth in Section 9 of this Agreement. (c) Construction Details. Not later than ninety (90) days after the Effective Date, Developer shall submit detailed construction plans and specifications for each of the Public Roadways (the “Construction Details”). The Construction Details shall include, for each Public Roadway, the following information: detailed plans and specifications that are consistent with all Applicable Laws, construction schedule, proposed temporary construction access in relationship to Rivery Park and existing street s, the estimated cost of constructing each Public Roadway as determined by a professional engineer, and, if necessary, alternate access options for visitors to Rivery Park during construction of a Public Roadway. Within thirty (30) calendar days of receip t of the Construction Details, the City shall respond to Developer by either approving the Construction Details or conditionally approving the Construction Details subject to additional requirements or alterations mutually acceptable to the City and Developer. Failure of the City to respond to the submittal of the Construction Details within the thirty (30) day period shall not be deemed to be acceptance of same by the City. (d) Notice to Proceed. Construction shall not commence on a Public Roadway until Developer has received a written "Notice to Proceed" from the City’s Development Engineer for that specific Public Roadway. No Notice to Proceed shall be valid unless and until Developer has provided the documentation required by Section 4(a) of this Agreement, the performance and payment bonds required by Section 4(h) of this Agreement, and the Insurance required by Section 6 of this Agreement. (e) Approved Plans. All work must be performed in compliance with the Applicable Laws and with the City-approved Construction Details, construction plans and specifications for the Public Roadways (collectively, the “Approved Plans”). All work performed under this Agreement must also be free from design and construction defects. In addition, Developer shall follow all City ordinances and other rules and regulations regarding permits and approvals related to activities and construction of the Public Roadways, as well as those of any other governmental entity having jurisdiction. (f) Initial Costs. All costs of the Public Roadways, including any increases in the actual costs of the Public Roadways, including cost increases, change orders and overruns initially shall be borne by Developer. Costs include, but are not limited to, consultant fees, design costs, landscaping costs, labor costs, site restoration and re- vegetation costs, materials costs, engineering costs, legal fees, utility connection fees, permits, inspection fees, insurance costs and any other costs incurred in the design and construction of the Public Roadways. First Amended and Restated GTEC Performance Agreement The Summit at Rivery Park Page 10 of 27 (g) No Liens. Developer shall have no right to place liens on the Public Roadways or any other publicly-owned property, and shall not allow any liens to be placed against the Public Roadways or any publicly-owned property by any contractor, subcontractor, employee, agent or assign or one or more of them (the "Contractors") or their vendors. Developer agrees that the City will not accept for maintenance or ownership any Public Roadways burdened by any lien or any other encumbrance. (h) Payment and Performance Bonds. Prior to and as a condition of the City’s issuance of the Notice to Proceed, Developer shall post, or cause the Contractors to post, performance and payment bonds in the full amounts of the contract price for each Public Infrastructure Improvement. The form and amount of the bonds comply with Chapter 2253 of the Government Code. (i) Diligent Prosecution of the Work. Developer shall diligently prosecute completion of the Public Roadways and coordinate all construction activity with the City’s Development Engineer following issuance of the Notice to Proceed. In addition to obtaining any required street closure permits, if necessary, a minimum of fourteen (14) business days notice must be given to the City’s Parks & Recreation Department Director to temporarily close any part of Rivery Park for any reason or to temporarily suspend access to any part of Rivery Park to facilitate or perform work under this Agreement. (j) As-Built Plans. After construction of each Public Roadway, Developer shall submit a set of construction plans for each Public Roadway certified as “as-built” by the engineer responsible for preparing the Approved Plans. (k) Completion Notice. Upon completion of construction of the Public Roadways, Developer shall deliver to the City written notice that construction of the Public Roadways have been completed and are ready for final inspection, that the Maintenance Bond required by Section 4(o) of this Agreement is in place, and that Developer has submitted a set of construction plans for the completed Public Roadways certified as “as-built” by the engineer responsible for preparing the construction plans for the Public Roadways (collectively, the "Completion Notice"). Within fourteen (14) business days of receipt of the Completion Notice, the City shall respond to Developer by either submitting a list of items still requiring completion or modification, or by accepting the Public Roadways by Letter of Acceptance (the “Letter of Acceptance”). Final acceptance of the Public Roadways shall be evidenced by a Letter of Acceptance from the City, but shall not be valid unless and until the Maintenance Bond required by Section 4(o) of this Agreement is in place. Failure to respond to a Completion Notice within the 14-day period shall be not deemed acceptance by the City. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City shall not be responsible for maintenance of any landscaping, First Amended and Restated GTEC Performance Agreement The Summit at Rivery Park Page 11 of 27 irrigation improvements, or other amenities or improvements that may be placed in the median(s) or in the rights-of-way of the Public Roadway(s). (l) Warranty Deed. Within five (5) calendar days of the date of the Letter of Acceptance, Developer shall convey to the City at no cost to the City and by General Warranty Deed the Public Roadways. The Developer shall provide a title insurance policy to the City insuring the City’s record title to the Public Roadways, and shall pay all property taxes and closing costs so that the City takes the Public Roadways free of all taxes and liens. The deed(s) shall be in a form approved by the City. All pre- and post- closing taxes and all closing costs shall be borne solely by the Developer. No final plat for any portion of the Property located in Zones B1, B2, or B3 (as shown on Exhibit B) any part of the Property shall be issued unless and until the Public Roadways are properly conveyed to the City. (m) Maintenance Period. Developer hereby warrants that the Public Roadways will be free from defects for a period of one (1) year from the date the City accepts the construction of the Public Roadways (the "Maintenance Period"). The Developer shall correct and repair, or cause to be corrected and repaired, any defects in materials or workmanship of a Public Roadway that occurs before and during the Maintenance Period due to any cause. (n) Transfer of Warranties. Within thirty (30) days after the date of the Letters of Acceptance for the Public Roadways, Developer shall transfer to the City all contractor, subcontractor, consultant and manufacturer warranties for the Public Roadways. (o) Maintenance Bond. For all of the Public Roadways, as a condition of the City’s acceptance of dedication of the Public Roadways, and to secure the Developer’s warranty obligations during the Maintenance Period, the Developer shall provide a Maintenance Bond in the amount of Twenty Five Percent (25%) of the total cost of constructing all of the Public Roadways (the “Maintenance Bond”). The Maintenance Bond must be in a form approved for use in the City’s Development Manual. The Public Roadways must meet the all Applicable Laws at the end of the Maintenance Period in order for the City to release the Maintenance Bond. Upon release of the Maintenance Bond, Developer shall have no further obligations or responsibility for the Public Roadways. (p) Timely Payments. Developer shall make timely payment for all aspects of properly performed engineering, design, construction work (including inspection fees), and for all materials and services relating to the Public Roadways in accordance with the applicable construction contract and design services contracts for the Public Roadways. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, Developer shall have the right to First Amended and Restated GTEC Performance Agreement The Summit at Rivery Park Page 12 of 27 contest payment amounts so long as Developer causes any disputed amount to be escrowed or any lien resulting therefrom to be released by bond within thirty (30) days from the date of such lien. SECTION 5. PARTICIPATION BY GTEC. (a) Initial Payment. Developer shall initially pay all costs associated with the construction of the Public Roadways. (b) Amount of Cost Reimbursement. Only Qualified Expenditures are eligible for reimbursement under this Agreement. In no event shall the total amount of Qualified Expenditures reimbursed under this Agreement exceed the GTEC Share. Developer understands and acknowledges that the actual cost of the Public Roadways is likely to exceed the GTEC Share, and further understands and acknowledges that any costs or expenses associated with the Public Roadways in excess of the GTEC Share shall be borne solely by Developer and that neither the City nor GTEC shall be responsible for any costs over and above the GTEC Share. (c) Submittal of Reimbursement Request. After the fulfillment of all of the Reimbursement Conditions, Developer shall submit to the City and to GTEC a final consolidated report of all Qualified Expenditures associated with the Public Roadways, including all necessary supporting information and documentation (the “Reimbursement Request”). Such information shall include, but not be limited to, payment applications, cancelled checks evidencing payment, lien waivers from the Contractor and all subcontractors and suppliers, the warranties required by Section 4(n) and the Maintenance Bond required by Section 4(o). The Reimbursement Request must also include a statement signed by the Contractor and signed and sealed by the project engineer (who shall be a registered professional engineer licensed to practice in the State of Texas) attesting to the amount of the work performed, labor furnished, materials included, and the actual costs of each of the Qualified Expenditures shown on Exhibit D. Developer agrees to provide all information and documents in its possession or under its control reasonably required by the City and GTEC for proper processing and for accurate accounting and documentation of actual costs for the construction of the Public Roadways. The Reimbursement Request will not be considered until after all of the Reimbursement Conditions have been completed. (d) Review and Processing of Reimbursement Request. Provided that all of the Reimbursement Conditions have been fulfilled, the City and GTEC shall promptly First Amended and Restated GTEC Performance Agreement The Summit at Rivery Park Page 13 of 27 review the Reimbursement Request and respond to Developer within fifteen (15) business days after the receipt of a complete Reimbursement Request. (1) If both the City and GTEC approve the Reimbursement Request, the City or GTEC shall give Developer written notice of their approval thereof within fifteen (15) business after its receipt of the Reimbursement Request (the “Approval of Reimbursement Request”), but failure by the City or GTEC to respond to the Reimbursement Request within fifteen (15) business shall not be construed to be approval by the City or GTEC of the Reimbursement Request. Within fifteen (15) business days after the City and GTEC provide Developer with their Approval of Reimbursement Request, GTEC shall pay to Developer the amount specified in the Approval of Reimbursement Request, not to exceed the GTEC Share. (2) If the City or GTEC determine that the amount owing to Developer is less than the amount submitted by Developer in the Reimbursement Request, the City or GTEC shall work diligently and in good faith with Developer to resolve the discrepancy within thirty (30) business days. If the Parties are unable to resolve the discrepancy within thirty (30) business days, each Party shall have the rights and remedies available to it at law and in equity to enforce this Agreement. (e) Payment of Reimbursement Request. GTEC hereby appropriates the GTEC Share from lawfully available funds to pay future Reimbursement Requests, subject to all other conditions to reimbursement required by this Agreement. The City shall have no obligation to expend any funds under this Agreement. SECTION 6. INSURANCE Prior to and as a condition of the City’s issuance of the No tice to Proceed, Developer shall procure and maintain, or cause its Contractors to procure and maintain insurance coverages in accordance with the requirements as set forth in Exhibit E to this Agreement, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein fo r all purposes as if set forth in full. Such insurance coverages shall remain in full force and effect for the duration of this Agreement. SECTION 7. EVENTS OF DEFAULT. Each of the following shall constitute an Event of Default under this Agreement: First Amended and Restated GTEC Performance Agreement The Summit at Rivery Park Page 14 of 27 (a) Failure to Construct. Failure of Developer or Hines (as applicable) to construct the Hotel, Conference Center, Public Parking Garage, Public Roadways, Public Infrastructure Improvements (as that term is defined in the GEDCO Performance Agreement), or the Parkland Improvements as required by this Agreement and/or the Related Documents, and to secure a final Certification of Completion (for the Hotel, Conference Center, and Public Parking Garage) or the City’s final acceptance (for the Public Infrastructure Improvements or Public Roadways) on or before the Construction Deadline, is an Event of Default. (b) False Statements. Any warranty, representation, or statement made or furnished to GEDCO or the City by or on behalf of Developer , Brae, or Hines under this Agreement or under any of the Related Documents that is false or misleading in any material respect, either now or at the time made or furnished, is an Event of Default. (c) Insolvency. Developer’s, Brae’s, or Hines’ insolvency, appointment of receiver for any part of their respective property or the Property, any assignment for the benefit of creditors of any of them, any type of creditor workout for any of them, or the commencement of any proceeding under any bankruptcy or insolvency laws by or against any of them is an Event of Default. (d) General. The failure of a Party to this Agreement to comply with any term, covenant, or condition contained in this Agreement, or the failure of any party to a Related Document to comply with any term, covenant, or condition contained in a Related Document, is an Event of Default. SECTION 8. EFFECT OF AN EVENT OF DEFAULT. (a) Failure to Construct. In the event Developer or Hines (as applicable) fail to construct the Hotel, Conference Center, Public Parking Garage, Public Infrastructure Improvements (as defined in the GEDCO Performance Agreement), the Public Roadways, or the Parkland Improvements as required by this Agreement and/or the Related Documents, and to secure a final Certification of Completion (for the Hotel, Conference Center, and Public Parking Garage) or the City’s final acceptance (for the Public Infrastructure Improvements or the Public Roadways) on or before the Construction Deadline, GTEC shall have no obligation to reimburse Developer for any part of the GTEC Share. First Amended and Restated GTEC Performance Agreement The Summit at Rivery Park Page 15 of 27 (b) Other Event of Default. If an Event of Default other than an event described in Section 7(a) of this Agreement occurs, the non-defaulting party shall give written notice to the defaulting of any default, and the defaulting party shall have thirty (30) days (the “Cure Period”) to cure said default. Should said default remain uncured as of the last day of the Cure Period, and the non-defaulting party is not otherwise in the Parties shall each have all rights and remedies available to them in law and in equity for any Event of Default not specifically addressed above in Section 8(a). In the event that the default cannot be cured within the Cure Period, but Developer commences cure within the Cure Period and diligently pursues same, Developer shall have an additional period of time, not to exceed ninety (90) days from the initial default notice, in which to compete the cure. SECTION 9. FORCE MAJEURE (a) Definition. Except as otherwise provided below, the term “Force Majeure Event” means any act or event, whether foreseen or unforeseen, that meets all three (3) of the following tests: (1) The act or event prevents a party (the “Nonperforming Party”), in whole or in part, from (i) performing its obligations under this Agreement; or (ii) satisfying any conditions precedent to the other party’s (the “Performing Party’s”) obligations under this Agreement; and (2) The act or event is beyond the reasonable control of and not the fault of the Nonperforming Party, and (3) The Nonperforming Party has been unable to avoid or overcome the act or event by the exercise of due diligence. (b) Report of a Force Majeure Event. No later than five (5) business days after becoming aware of the occurrence of a Force Majeure Event, the Nonperforming Party shall furnish the Performing Party with a written report describing the particulars of the occurrence, including an estimate of its expected duration and probable impact on the performance of the Nonperforming Party’s obligations under this Ag reement (the “Report”). (c) Duties During the Continuation of a Force Majeure Event. During the continuation of the Force Majeure Event, the Nonperforming Party shall: (1) exercise commercially reasonable efforts to mitigate or limit damages to the Performing Party; First Amended and Restated GTEC Performance Agreement The Summit at Rivery Park Page 16 of 27 (2) exercise commercially reasonable due diligence to overcome the Force Majeure Event; (3) to the extent it is able, continue to perform its other obligations under this Agreement; (4) cause the suspension of performance to be of no grea ter scope and no longer duration than the Force Majeure Event requires; and (5) cause payments required under this Agreement to be paid when and as due. (d) Resumption of Performance. When the Nonperforming Party is able to: (1) resume performance of its obligations under this Agreement, or (2) satisfy the conditions to the Performing Party’s obligations, it shall immediately give the Performing Party written notice to that effect and shall resume performance under this Agreement. (e) Dispute Resolution Related to Force Majeure. The Parties shall negotiate in good faith and attempt to resolve any dispute among them as to whether a Force Majeure Event has occurred, or whether a Force Majeure Event has prevented the Nonperforming Party, in whole or in part, from performing any obligation or satisfying any condition under this Agreement. If the Parties are unable to resolve the dispute or to agree on a course of action within ten (10) calendar days from the date of the Report, the Parties shall submit the dispute to the Williamson County Commissioners Court for a binding determination on the sole issue of whether an Event of Force Majeure has occurred or has prevented the Nonperforming Party from performing any obligation or satisfying any condition under this Agreement. The burden of proof for demonstrating that a Force Majeure Event has occurred, or that a Force Majeure Event has prevented performance, shall be on the Nonperforming Party. (f) Exclusive Remedy. The relief offered by this Section 9 is the exclusive remedy available to the Nonperforming Party with respect to a Force Majeure Event, and the Parties waive the common law defenses of impossibility and impracticability with respect to the Force Majeure Events and any event or act that might b e deemed a force majeure event under the common law. First Amended and Restated GTEC Performance Agreement The Summit at Rivery Park Page 17 of 27 SECTION 10. INDEMNIFICATION AND DEVELOPER’S REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES AND COVENANTS. (a) DEVELOPER, ITS PARTNERS, MEMBERS, OFFICERS, SUCCESSORS, AGENTS, AFFILIATES, CONTRACTORS, AND ASSIGNS (COLLECTIVELY, THE “INDEMNITORS”) SHALL, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY, INDEMNIFY, SAVE, AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY, GTEC, AND THEIR RESPECTIVE DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, AGENTS, ATTORNEYS, AND EMPLOYEES (COLLECTIVELY, THE "INDEMNITEES") FROM AND AGAINST: (I) ANY AND ALL CLAIMS, DEMANDS, ACTIONS OR CAUSES OF ACTION THAT ARE ASSERTED AGAINST ANY INDEMNITEE IF THE CLAIM, DEMAND, ACTION OR CAUSE OF ACTION DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY RELATES TO TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE WITH CONTRACT OR BUSINESS INTERFERENCE, OR WRONGFUL OR NEGLIGENT USE OF GTEC FUNDING BY THE INTEMNITORS OR ANY OF THEIR AGENTS AND EMPLOYEES; (II) ANY ADMINISTRATIVE OR INVESTIGATIVE PROCEEDING BY ANY GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITY DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY RELATED, TO A CLAIM, DEMAND, ACTION OR CAUSE OF ACTION IN WHICH ANY INDEMNITEE IS A DISINTERESTED PARTY; (III) ANY CLAIM, DEMAND, ACTION OR CAUSE OF ACTION WHICH DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY CONTESTS OR CHALLENGES THE LEGAL AUTHORITY OF THE INDEMNITEES OR THE INDEMNITORS TO ENTER INTO THIS AGREEMENT; (IV) ANY AND ALL LIABILITIES, LOSSES, COSTS, OR EXPENSES (INCLUDING REASONABLE ATTORNEYS' FEES AND DISBURSEMENTS) THAT ANY INDEMNITEE SUFFERS OR INCURS AS A RESULT OF ANY OF THE FOREGOING OR IS ARISING FROM OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT; (V) A BREACH OF THIS AGREEMENT OR VIOLATION OF LAW BY THE INDEMNITORS; (VI) A FALSE REPRESENTATION OR WARRANTY MADE BY THE INTEMNITORS IN THIS AGREEMENT OR IN THE DESCRIPTION OF THE PUBLIC ROADWAYS OR THE ESTIMATED COSTS LISTED ON EXHIBIT D OF THIS AGREEMENT; (VII) THE NEGLIGENCE, GROSS NEGLIGENCE, WILLFUL MISCONDUCT, OR BREACH OF A STANDARD OF STRICT LIABILITY BY THE INDEMNITORS IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT. CLAIMS TO BE INDEMNIFIED UNDER THIS SECTION INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO CLAIMS FOR BODILY INJURY OR DEATH, OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS OR DISEASE, LOSS OF SERVICES WAGES OR INCOME, DAMAGE DESTRUCTION OR LOSS OF USE OF PROPERTY, AND WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS. DEVELOPER’S OBLIGATIONS UNDER THIS ARTICLE ARE NOT EXCUSED IN THE EVENT A CLAIM IS CAUSED IN PART BY THE ALLEGED NEGLIGENCE OR WILLFUL MISCONDUCT OF ANY OF THE INDEMNIFIED PARTIES OR BREACH OF ANY OF SUCH PARTIES' OBLIGATIONS UNDER THIS AGREEMENT. IF ANY CLAIM, DEMAND, ACTION OR CAUSE OF ACTION IS ASSERTED AGAINST ANY INDEMNITEE, SUCH INDEMNITEE SHALL PROMPTLY NOTIFY THE INDEMNITORS, BUT THE FAILURE TO SO PROMPTLY NOTIFY THE INDEMNITORS SHALL NOT AFFECT THE INDEMNITORS’ OBLIGATIONS UNDER THIS SECTION UNLESS SUCH FAILURE MATERIALLY PREJUDICES THE INDEMNITORS’ RIGHT TO PARTICIPATE IN THE CONTEST OF SUCH CLAIM, DEMAND, ACTION OR CAUSE OF ACTION, AS HEREINAFTER PROVIDED. IF REQUESTED BY THE INDEMNITORS IN WRITING, AS SO LONG AS NO DEFAULT OR EVENT OF DEFAULT SHALL HAVE OCCURRED AND BE CONTINUING, SUCH INDEMNITEE SHALL IN GOOD FAITH CONTEST THE VALIDITY, APPLICABILITY AND AMOUNT OF SUCH CLAIM, DEMAND, ACTION OR CAUSE OF First Amended and Restated GTEC Performance Agreement The Summit at Rivery Park Page 18 of 27 ACTION AND SHALL PERMIT THE INDEMNITORS TO PARTICIPATE IN SUCH CONTEST. ANY INDEMNITEE THAT PROPOSES TO SETTLE OR COMPROMISE ANY CLAIM, DEMAND, ACTION, CAUSE OF ACTION OR PROCEEDING FOR WHICH THE INDEMNITORS MAY BE LIABLE FOR PAYMENT OF INDEMNITY HEREUNDER SHALL GIVE THE INDEMNITORS WRITTEN NOTICE OF THE TERMS OF SUCH PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OR COMPROMISE REASONABLY IN ADVANCE OF SETTLING OR COMPROMISING SUCH CLAIM OR PROCEEDING AND SHALL OBTAIN THE INDEMNITORS’ CONCURRENCE THERETO. (b) Developer represents and warrants to the City that the following representation and warranties are true as of the Effective Date: (1) Due Organization and Ownership. Developer is a limited liability company validly existing under the laws of the State of Texas, and the person executing this Agreement on behalf of Developer is authorized to enter into this Agreement. The sole managing member of Developer is Jeffrey Ladd Novak. (2) Due Authority; No Conflict. Developer has all requisite power and authority to execute this Agreement and to carry out its obligations hereunder and the transactions contemplated hereby. This Agreement has been, and the documents contemplated hereby will be, duly executed by Developer and constitute Developer’s legal, valid and binding o bligations enforceable against Developer in accordance with their terms. The consummation by Developer of the transactions contemplated hereby is not in violation of or in conflict with, nor does it constitute a default under, any term or provision of the organizational documents of Developer, or any of the terms of any agreement or instrument to which Developer is a party, or by which Developer is bound, or of any provision of any applicable law, ordinance, rule or regulation of any governmental authority or of any provision of any applicable order, judgment or decree of any court, arbitrator or governmental authority. (3) Consents. No consent, approval, order or authorization of, or declaration or filing with any governmental authority is required on the part of Developer in connection with the execution and delivery of this Agreement or for the performance of the transactions herein contemplated by the respective Parties hereto. (4) Litigation. There are no pending or, to the best of Developer’s knowledge, threatened, judicial municipal, or administrative proceedings, consent decrees, or First Amended and Restated GTEC Performance Agreement The Summit at Rivery Park Page 19 of 27 judgments which might affect Developer’s ability to consummate the transaction contemplated hereby. (5) Legal Proceedings. No preliminary or permanent injunction or other order, decree, or ruling issued by a governmental entity, and not statute, rule, regulation, or executive order promulgated to or enacted by a governmental entity, shall be in effect which restrains, enjoins, prohibits, or otherwise makes illegal the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. SECTION 11. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. The following miscellaneous provisions are a part of this Agreement: (a) Amendments. This Agreement and the Exhibits attached hereto, together with all of the Related Documents, constitute the entire understanding and agreement of the parties as to the matters set forth in this Agreement. No alteration of or amendment to this Agreement shall be effective unless given in writing and signed by the party or parties sought to be charged or bound by the alteration or amendment. (b) Applicable Law and Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas, and all obligations of the parties created hereunder are performable in Williamson County, Texas. Venue for any action arising under this Agreement shall lie in the state district courts of Williamson County, Texas. (c) Assignment. This Agreement may not be assigned by Developer without the express written consent of both GTEC and the City Council. (d) Binding Obligation. This Agreement shall become a binding obligation on the Parties upon execution by all signatories hereto. Each Party to this Agreement warrants and represents that the individual or individuals executing this Agreement on behalf of them has full authority to execute this Agreement and bind them to the same. (e) Caption Headings. Caption headings in this Agreement are for convenience purposes only and are not to be used to interpret or define the provisions of the Agreement. First Amended and Restated GTEC Performance Agreement The Summit at Rivery Park Page 20 of 27 (f) Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which shall constitute one and the same document. (g) Notices. Any notice or other communication required or permitted by this Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the "Notice") is effective when in writing and (i) personally delivered or (ii) three (3) days after notice is deposited with the U.S. Postal Service, postage prepaid, certified with return receipt requested, and addressed as follows: if to Developer: Novak Brothers, LLC Attn: Jeff Novak, Managing Member 201 Adams Street Georgetown, Texas 78628 Telephone: (512) 931-7788 if to Brae: Brae Group, Ltd. Attn: Jeff Novak 201 Adams Street Georgetown, Texas 78628 Telephone: (512) 931-7788 If to Hines: Hines Georgetown Hotel LLC Attn: Travis M. Overall 811 Main Street, Suite 4100 Houston, Texas 77002 Telephone: (713) 237-5679 if to GTEC: Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation Attn: City of Georgetown Economic Development Director 113 E. 8th Street Georgetown, Texas 78626 Telephone: (512) 930-3652 First Amended and Restated GTEC Performance Agreement The Summit at Rivery Park Page 21 of 27 if to City: City of Georgetown Attn: City Manager 113 E. 8th Street Georgetown, Texas 78626 Telephone: (512) 930-3723 (h) Severability. If a court of competent jurisdiction finds any provision of this Agreement to be invalid or unenforceable as to any person or circumstance, such finding shall not render that provision invalid or unenforceable as to any other persons or circumstances. If feasible, any such offending provision shall be deemed to be modified to be within the limits of enforceability or validity if the Parties so agree; however, if the offending provision cannot be so modified by agreement, it shall be stricken and all other provisions of this Agreement in all other respects shall remain valid and enforceable. (i) Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement. (j) Undocumented Workers. Developer certifies that it does not and will not knowingly employ an undocumented worker in accordance with Chapter 2264 of the Texas Government Code, as amended. If during the Term of this Agreement, Developer is convicted of a violation under 8 U.S.C. § 1324a(f), Developer shall repay the amount of the public subsidy provided under this Agreement plus interest, at the rate of eight percent (8%), not later than the 120th day after the date GTEC notifies Developer of the violation. (k) Vesting. Developer agrees that neither this Agreement nor any proceedings related to the request for GTEC funds is a vesting event under Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code. (l) Further Assurances. The Parties agree to make, execute and deliver to GTEC such other promissory notes, instruments, documents and other agreements as GTEC or its attorneys may reasonably request to evidence this Agreement. (m) Performance. The Parties each agree to perform and comply with all terms, conditions, and provisions set forth in this Agreement and in a ll other instruments and agreements between or among them. First Amended and Restated GTEC Performance Agreement The Summit at Rivery Park Page 22 of 27 (n) Effect on Original Agreement. As of the Effective Date of this First Amended and Restated Performance Agreement, this First Amended and Restated Performance Agreement shall supersede and replace the Original Performance Agreement in its entirety and the Original Performance Agreement shall have no further force or effect. EXHIBIT LIST: Exhibit A Sketch of the Property Exhibit B Site Layout Exhibit C Public Roadways Exhibit D Qualified Expenditures Exhibit E Insurance and Payment and Performance Bond Requirements (The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank. Signature pages follow.) First Amended and Restated GTEC Performance Agreement The Summit at Rivery Park Page 23 of 27 NOVAK: NOVAK BROTHERS, LLC a Texas limited liability corporation By: Printed Name: Jeffrey Ladd Novak Title: Managing Member Date Signed: ACKNOWLEDGEMENT State of Texas § County of _______________ § This First Amended and Restated Performance Agreement was acknowledged before me on _______________________________________ (date) by Jeffrey Ladd Novak, the duly authorized Managing Member of of Novak Brothers, LLC, a Texas limited liability company, on behalf of Novak Brothers, LLC. Notary Public, State of Texas First Amended and Restated GTEC Performance Agreement The Summit at Rivery Park Page 24 of 27 GTEC: GEORGETOWN TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT CORPORATION, a Texas non-profit corporation By: Printed Name: Title: Board President Date Signed: ATTEST: , Board Secretary ACKNOWLEDGEMENT State of Texas § County of Williamson § This First Amended and Restated Performance Agreement was acknowledged before me on ____________________________________ (date) by _________________________________ (name), President of the Board of Directors of the Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation, a Texas corporation, on behalf of the Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation. Notary Public, State of Texas First Amended and Restated GTEC Performance Agreement The Summit at Rivery Park Page 25 of 27 CERTIFICATION OF BRAE GROUP, LTD. APPROVAL I hereby certify that the foregoing First Amended and Restated Performance Agreement pertaining to The Summit at Rivery Park was approved by Brae Group, Ltd., a Texas limited liability partnership, on the _______ day of ______________________________, 201_, as evidenced by the signatures of duly authorized representatives of Brae Group, Ltd. appearing below. BRAE GROUP, LTD. A Texas limited liability partnership By: Novak Brothers, LLC A Texas limited liability company its sole General Partner By: Jeff Novak Managing Member ACKNOWLEDGEMENT State of Texas § County of Williamson § This instrument was acknowledged before me on ____________________________(date) by Jeff Novak, Managing Member of Novak Brothers, LLC, a Texas limited liability company, General partner of Brae Group, Ltd., a Texas limited partnership, on behalf of Brae Group, Ltd. Notary Public, State of Texas First Amended and Restated GTEC Performance Agreement The Summit at Rivery Park Page 26 of 27 CERTIFICATION OF HINES GEORGETOWN HOTEL, LLC APPROVAL I hereby certify that the foregoing First Amended and Restated Performance Agreement pertaining to The Summit at Rivery Park was approved by Hines Georgetown Hotel, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, on the _______ day of ______________________________, 201 _, as evidenced by the signatures of duly authorized representatives of Hines Georgetown Hotel, LLC appearing below. HINES GEORGETOWN HOTEL, LLC a Delaware limited liability company By: Hines Georgetown Hotel Associates Limited Partnership, a Texas limited partnership, its sole member By: Hines Georgetown Hotel GP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, its general partner By: Hines Interests Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership, its sole member By: Hines Holdings, Inc, a Texas corporation, its general partner By: Printed Name: Title: Date Signed: ACKNOWLEDGEMENT State of Texas § County of Harris § This instrument was acknowledged before me on _____________________________ (date) by ____________________________________________________________________ (name of officer), ___________________________________________________(title of officer) of Hines Georgetown Hotel LLC, a Texas limited liability company, on behalf of Hines Georgetown Hotel LLC. , Notary Public, State of Texas First Amended and Restated GTEC Performance Agreement The Summit at Rivery Park Page 27 of 27 CERTIFICATION OF CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL I hereby certify that the foregoing First Amended and Restated Performance Agreement pertaining to The Summit at Rivery Park was approved by the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, on the ______________________ day of ______________________________, 201_. THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS A Texas home-rule municipality By: Dale Ross, Mayor ATTEST: By: Jessica Brettle, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Bridget Chapman, City Attorney ACKNOWLEDGEMENT State of Texas § County of Williamson § This instrument was acknowledged before me on ________________________ (date) by Dale Ross, Mayor or the City of Georgetown, Texas, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, on behalf of the City of Georgetown, Texas. Notary Public, State of Texas City of Georgetown, Texas SUBJECT: EXECUTIVE SESSION In compliance with the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, Government Code, Vernon's Texas Codes, Annotated, the items listed below will be discussed in closed session and are subject to action in the regular session. Section 551.071 – Consultation with Attorney Discussion and deliberation on proposed settlement of the following condemnation proceedings in connection with the FM 1460 Improvement Project (North Segment): a. Cause No. 13-1718-CC4; The State of Texas and the City of Georgetown v. Rabbit Hill Partners and First State Bank Central Texas; Condemnation Proceeding, County Court at Law No. 4, Williamson County, Texas (TxDOT RCSJ #2211-02-019 Parcel 211) b. Cause No. 13-1719-CC1; The State of Texas and the City of Georgetown v. Gordon L. Peterson, Brian F. Peterson, and Peggy Peterson; Condemnation Proceeding, County Court at Law No. 1, Williamson County, Texas (TxDOT RCSJ #2211-02-019 Parcel 212) c. Cause No. 13-1721-CC3; The State of Texas and the City of Georgetown v. Brian Felix Peterson, Peggy Peterson and JDS, Inc., d/b/a First Option Mortgage Services; Condemnation Proceeding, County Court at Law No. 3, Williamson County, Texas (TxDOT RCSJ #2211-02-019 Parcel 215) - Kristina Silcocks, Attorney for the City, and Terri Glasby Calhoun, Real Estate Services Coordinator and Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Transportation Services Director Section 551.072 - Deliberation Regarding Real Property Discussion and deliberation on acquisition of real property from The Guy, Jr. Family Trust, dated October 2, 2003, W.T. Guy, Jr. and Valaree C. Guy Trustors and Monnajene G. Knight, Trustee for The Britton Family Trust, in connection with the Southwest Bypass Road Project – Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Transportation Services Director, and Terri Glasby Calhoun, Real Estate Services Coordinator ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: n/a SUBMITTED BY: