HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda_GTEC_12.18.2019Notice of Meeting for the
Georgetown Transportation E nhancement Corp and the Gov erning B ody
of the City of Georgetown
December 18, 2019 at 3:30 P M
at G MC B uilding, 300-1 I ndustrial Av enue, Georgetown, T X 78626
T he C ity of G eorgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If you
require as s is tance in partic ipating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the ADA, reas onable
as s is tance, adaptations , or ac commodations will be provided upon request. P leas e c ontact the C ity S ec retary's
O ffic e, at leas t three (3) days prior to the sc heduled meeting date, at (512) 930-3652 or C ity Hall at 808 Martin
Luther King Jr. S treet, G eorgetown, T X 78626 for additional information; T T Y users route through R elay
Texas at 711.
Regular Session
(T his R egular S es s ion may, at any time, be rec es s ed to c onvene an Exec utive S es s ion for any purpose
authorized by the O pen Meetings Act, Texas G overnment C ode 551.)
A C all to O rder
B Introduc tion of New Board Members and Visitors
C Indus try/C AMP O /T xDO T Updates - R ay Miller, Acting P ublic Works Direc tor
D Dec ember 2019 G T EC Updates - Wesley Wright, P.E., S ystems Engineering Direc tor/Mic hael Hallmark,
C I P Manager
E P resentation of G eorgetown Trans portation Enhanc ement C orporation preliminary
monthly financial reports for November 2019. -- P aul Diaz, Budget Manager, C O G , F inanc e Manager,
G T EC .
L egislativ e Regular Agenda
F C ons ideration and possible approval of the minutes from the November 20, 2019 G T EC Board Meeting.
-- David Morgan - G eneral Manager, G T EC Board
G C ons ideration and possible action on an Agreement for a Loc al O n-S ys tem Improvement P rojec t with the
Texas Department of Trans portation (T xDO T ) for s ignal and roadway improvements along S H29, jus t
east of I H35 -- Wes ley Wright, P E, S ys tems Engineering Director
H P ublic hearing by the G eorgetown Trans portation Enhanc ement C orporation (G T EC ) regarding the
expenditure of 4B s ales tax funds for the proposed C onfido I I I P roject. – Leigh Wallac e, F inance
Direc tor, C O G , F inance Manager, G T EC .
I P ublic hearing by the G eorgetown Trans portation Enhanc ement C orporation (G T EC ) regarding the
expenditure of 4B s ales tax funds for the proposed C os tc o W holesale C orp P rojec t. – Leigh Wallace,
F inanc e Direc tor, C O G , F inance Manager, G T EC .
Ce rtificate of Posting
I, R obyn Densmore, C ity S ecretary for the C ity of G eorgetown, Texas, do hereby c ertify that this Notic e of
Meeting was posted at C ity Hall, 808 Martin Luther King Jr. S treet, G eorgetown, T X 78626, a plac e readily
Page 1 of 67
acc es s ible to the general public as required by law, on the _____ day of _________________, 2019, at
__________, and remained s o posted for at leas t 72 c ontinuous hours prec eding the s cheduled time of said
meeting.
__________________________________
R obyn Dens more, C ity S ec retary
Page 2 of 67
City of Georgetown, Texas
Transportation Enhancement Corp
December 18, 2019
S UB J E C T:
C all to O rder
IT E M S UMMARY:
F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
N/A
S UB MIT T E D B Y:
Laura Wilkins - Board Liais on
Page 3 of 67
City of Georgetown, Texas
Transportation Enhancement Corp
December 18, 2019
S UB J E C T:
Introduction of New Board Members and Vis itors
IT E M S UMMARY:
F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
N/A
S UB MIT T E D B Y:
Emily Koontz - Board Liais on
Page 4 of 67
City of Georgetown, Texas
Transportation Enhancement Corp
December 18, 2019
S UB J E C T:
Industry/C AMP O /T xDO T Updates - R ay Miller, Ac ting P ublic Works Director
IT E M S UMMARY:
F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
N/A
S UB MIT T E D B Y:
Laura Wilkins - Board Liais on
Page 5 of 67
City of Georgetown, Texas
Transportation Enhancement Corp
December 18, 2019
S UB J E C T:
December 2019 G T EC Updates - Wes ley Wright, P.E., S ys tems Engineering Director/Michael Hallmark,
C I P Manager
IT E M S UMMARY:
December 2019 GT E C updates
Northwest Boulevard:
P re-con held on Nov 16th, C onstruc tion survey c omplete, R O W prep underway. Elec tric is clear near
Traffic C ircle, S udden link as well and F rontier almost c omplete relocating. Underground utility relocation
to begin Dec ember. 4th Q uarter 2020 expec ted completion. Northwes t to be c los ed to through traffic from
January 6th –April from F ontana to I H 35
Rabbit Hill Road Improvements:
Des ign is tentatively c omplete. R O W proc urement ongoing. P roject limits have changed to end at the firs t
property line North of C ommerc e Blvd on the East side of R abbit Hill R d. Expec ted to bid early 2020.
Rivery Boulevard Extension:
Rivery, Williams to N orthwest substantially complete. R oad opened to traffic 9-3-19 from Williams to P ark
traffic circle. Section from P ark to N orthwest open. U tilities final relocation off Williams turn lane first of
D ecember. Contractor moving back in to finish project J anuary 6th to avoid holiday season shut downs.
S outheast Inner loop/ Southwestern Blvd
S outhwes tern:
· P reparing plan/profile sheets.
· F inalizing S torm C onveyance System for the project
· Evaluating Water Q uality T reatment O ptions;
· P reparing U tility plan/profile sheets (water/wastewater)
· I dentifying utility conflicts
S E Inner Loop: This section to bid first quarter of 2020
· P reparing plan/profile sheets
· F inalizing S torm C onveyanc e S ys tem for the project
· Evaluating Water Q uality Treatment O ptions ;
• P reparing Utility plan/profile s heets (water/wastewater)
• Identifying utility conflicts
F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
N/A
S UB MIT T E D B Y:
Wesley Wright, P.E., S ystems Engineering Direc tor/Mic hael Hallmark, C I P Manager
AT TAC H ME N T S:
Description Type
GTEC cover Cover Memo
Page 6 of 67
GTEC Board Meeting Date: Item No.
GEORGETOWN TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT CORPORATION
AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
SUBJECT: December 2019 GTEC Updates - Wesley Wright, P.E., Systems Engineering Director/Michael
Hallmark, CIP Manager
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
ITEM SUMMARY:
December 2019 GTEC updates
Northwest Boulevard:
Pre-con held on Nov 16th, Construction survey complete, ROW prep underway. Electric is clear near Traffic
Circle, Sudden link as well and Frontier almost complete relocating. Underground utility relocation to begin
December. 4th Quarter 2020 expected completion. Northwest to be closed to through traffic from January 6th
–April from Fontana to IH 35
Rabbit Hill Road Improvements:
Design is tentatively complete. ROW procurement ongoing. Project limits have changed to end at the first
property line North of Commerce Blvd on the East side of Rabbit Hill Rd.
Rivery Boulevard Extension:
Rivery, Williams to Northwest substantially complete. Road opened to traffic 9-3-19 from Williams to Park
traffic circle. Section from Park to Northwest open. Utilities final relocation off Williams turn lane first of
December. Contractor moving back in to finish project January 6th to avoid holiday season shut downs.
Southeast Inner loop/ Southwestern Blvd
Southwestern:
• Preparing plan/profile sheets.
• Finalizing Storm Conveyance System for the project
• Evaluating Water Quality Treatment Options;
• Preparing Utility plan/profile sheets (water/wastewater)
• Identifying utility conflicts
SE Inner Loop: This section to bid first quarter of 2020
• Preparing plan/profile sheets
• Finalizing Storm Conveyance System for the project
• Evaluating Water Quality Treatment Options;
• Preparing Utility plan/profile sheets (water/wastewater)
• Identifying utility conflicts
Page 7 of 67
Northwest Boulevard
(Fontana Drive to Austin Avenue)
Project No. 5QX TIP No. AF
December 2019
Project Description Construction of overpass and surface roads to connect Northwest Boulevard with
Austin Avenue and FM 971.
Purpose This project will relieve congestion at the Austin Avenue/Williams Drive
intersection and provide a more direct access from the west side of IH 35 corridor to
Georgetown High School and SH 130 via FM 971.
Project Manager Joel Weaver and Wesley Wright, P.E.
Engineer Klotz Associates
Element Status / Issues
Design Design is complete.
Environmental/
Archeological
Complete
Rights of Way Offers have been made on 9 parcels. 9 parcels needed, 7 acquired to date, 2 in
condemnation with constructive possession obtained.
Utility Relocations TBD
Construction Pre-con held on Nov 16th, Construction survey complete, ROW prep underway. Electric is
clear near Traffic Circle, Sudden link as well and Frontier almost complete relocating.
Underground utility relocation to begin December. 4th Quarter 2020 expected completion.
Northwest to be closed to through traffic from January 6th –April from Fontana to IH 35
Other Issues
Page 8 of 67
Rabbit Hill Road Improvements Project
(Westinghouse Road to S. Clearview Drive)
Project No. 5RQ TIP No. BZ
December 2019
Project Description Reconstruct Rabbit Hill Road from Westinghouse Road northward to S. Clearview
Dr. Widening along Westinghouse Road will also be included in the schematic for
additional turning lanes to/from Westinghouse Road. The project length along the
anticipated alignment is approximately 0.75 miles
Project Managers Ken Taylor and Wesley Wright, P.E.
Engineer CP&Y, Inc.
Element Status / Issues
Design Final Design Tentatively complete.
Environmental/
Archeological
Efforts underway and any issues are expected to be identified in the coming
month.
Rights of Way Two properties acquired as part of Mays St. Extension. Two
remaining, negotiations ongoing and Council has approved
condemnation.
Total Parcels: 4
Possession: 2
Pending: 2
Utility Relocations Will be initiated as ROW/easements are acquired and as part of the bidding
process. Multiple relocations expected – Round Rock water and Georgetown
Electric.
Construction ROW procurement ongoing
Other Issues Project limits have changed to end at the first property line North of Commerce
Blvd on the East side of Rabbit Hill Rd.
Page 9 of 67
Widening of: SE Inner Loop - FM 1460 to Austin Avenue Roadway &
Southwestern Boulevard – Raintree Drive to SE Inner Loop Roadway
Project No.
December 2019
Project Description FM 1460 to Austin Avenue Roadway Widening Project & Southwestern Boulevard –
Raintree Drive to SE Inner Loop Roadway Widening Project (See Attached Exhibit C). The
professional services will consist of providing final roadway, drainage, water, wastewater,
incidental designs, as well as, utility coordination, ROW support, environmental phase I
investigations, archeological investigations, geotechnical investigations, ROW &
Temporary Construction Easement (TCE) metes and bounds documents, bidding
documents, bidding services, and construction administration services.
Project Managers Joel Weaver and Wesley Wright, P.E.
Engineer KPA & Associates
Element Status / Issues
Design Southwestern:
• Preparing plan/profile sheets.
• Finalizing Storm Conveyance System for the project
• Evaluating Water Quality Treatment Options;
• Preparing Utility plan/profile sheets (water/wastewater)
• Identifying utility conflicts
SE Inner Loop: This section to bid first quarter of 2020
• Preparing plan/profile sheets
• Finalizing Storm Conveyance System for the project
• Evaluating Water Quality Treatment Options;
• Preparing Utility plan/profile sheets (water/wastewater)
• Identifying utility conflicts
Environmental/
Archeological
Efforts to begin April 2019 and any issues are expected to be identified in the
coming month.
Rights of Way ROW needs on Southwestern to be determined Total Parcels: 0
Possession: 0 Page 10 of 67
Pending: 0
Utility Relocations To be determined
Construction
Other Issues None.
Page 11 of 67
Rivery Boulevard Extension
(Williams Drive to Northwest Boulevard @ Fontana Drive)
Project No. 5RM TIP No. AD
December 2019
Project
Description
Develop the Rights-of-Way Map, acquire ROW, address potential environmental issues
and complete construction plans specifications and estimate (PS&E) for the extension of
Rivery Boulevard from Williams Drive to Northwest Boulevard at Fontana Drive in
anticipation of future funding availability.
Purpose To provide a route between Williams Drive and Northwest Boulevard serving the
Gateway area, providing an alternate route from Williams Drive to the future
Northwest Boulevard Bridge over IH 35, to provide a route between the hotels in the
Gateway area and the proposed Conference Center near Rivery Boulevard and Wolf
Ranch Parkway.
Project Manager Travis Baird, Joel Weaver, and Wesley Wright, P.E.
Engineer Kasberg Patrick and Associates
Element Status / Issues
Design Complete
Environmental/
Archeology
Complete
Rights of Way All parcels in possession. Condemnation of 1 parcel
continuing, no impact on operation of roadway.
Total Parcels: 22
Appraised: 22
Offers: 22
Acquired: 21
Closing pending: 0
Condemnation: 1
Utility Relocations Complete
Construction Rivery, Williams to Northwest substantially complete. Road opened to traffic 9-3-19
from Williams to Park traffic circle. Section from Park to Northwest open. Utilities
final relocation off Williams turn lane first of December. Contractor moving back in
to finish project January 6th to avoid holiday season shut downs.
Other Issues
Page 12 of 67
City of Georgetown, Texas
Transportation Enhancement Corp
December 18, 2019
S UB J E C T:
P res entation of G eorgetown Transportation Enhancement C orporation preliminary
monthly financ ial reports for November 2019. -- P aul Diaz, Budget Manager, C O G , F inance Manager,
G T EC .
IT E M S UMMARY:
T he Bylaws of G T EC (Article V, S ec tion 6.02) require the F inanc e Manager to
report the financ ial ac tivity of the C orporation to the Board.
• F inancial reports
• S ales Tax revenues
• Any other relevant financ ial information
S ales tax is rec eived two months in arrears; therefore the revenues reflec t only
the amount rec eived, not actually earned, as of the report date. A report on
payments made to vendors for the month of May is also inc luded.
F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
N/A
S UB MIT T E D B Y:
Leigh Wallace F inance Director, C O G ; F inanc e Manager, G T EC
AT TAC H ME N T S:
Description Type
GTEC Monthly Report Backup Material
AP Check Report Backup Material
Page 13 of 67
F GTEC Monthly Report
GTEC MONTHLY REPORT AS OF NOVEMBER 30, 2019
Please note the November period is still open. These figures are preliminary and unaudited.
Operating Operating Operating Operating rrrrevenueevenueevenueevenue is comprised of sales tax and allocated interest. Sales tax revenue is budgeted at $7.9 million.
There are two parts to sales tax revenue. The largest part is the amount the City receives from the State Comptroller’s
Office. This revenue is received two months in arrears. December will be the first period those funds will appear in
the fund schedule. The second part of sales tax is related to self-retained sales tax the City collects on utility billing.
Through the period, this smaller amount of self-retained sales tax totals $43,615. Allocated interest totals $77,215.
Operating eOperating eOperating eOperating expense xpense xpense xpense includes administrative charges and office supplies. The administrative charges are typically
processed monthly. However, at the time of this report, those charges have not been processed due to the workload
requirements to close out FY2019. After the close out of FY2019, these charges will be booked monthly. By the end
of FY2020, the actual expenses will be at the budgeted amount. Operational expenses total zero through the second
month.
NonNonNonNon----operating revenue operating revenue operating revenue operating revenue is budgeted at $4.7 million and is comprised of bond proceeds. The City sells debt in the spring
and will not receive those proceeds until that point.
NonNonNonNon----operating expense operating expense operating expense operating expense is budgeted at $16.5 million and is comprised of transportation improvements for State
Highway 29 and Southeast Inner Loop, as well as the debt service payment for previously issued debt. The City pays
debt service twice a year in the fall and later in the spring. There have been no expenses on the FY2020 transportation
projects. November included continued improvement projects for the intersections: IH35 and HWY 29, as well as FM
971 and Fontana. Both intersections result in a zero balance for non-operating expenses for the month as the
expenses to date have been paid for by prior year encumbrances. The continued Mays Street Project and TIA
improvements currently have $47,667 in non-operating expenses. The Mays project was budgeted in FY2019 and is
part of the CIP rollforward amendment which went to Council this month.
Fund Fund Fund Fund Schedule DevelopmentSchedule DevelopmentSchedule DevelopmentSchedule Development
In the upcoming weeks, the accounting staff along with the City’s outside independent auditor Weaver and Associates
will begin the Year-End Audit and Comprehensive Annual Financial Report or CAFR process. Following the completion
of the CAFR, staff will update fund schedules with audited fund balances. Currently, the fund balance is only the
budgeted figure and not the actual. It is anticipated staff will have that information around the January or February
meeting.
Staff brought a CIP Rollforward Amendment to Council this month. Staff proposed to rollforward a combined total of
$5.1 million for the following improvement projects: Fontana Northwest Bridge, Interstate 35/ Highway 29
intersection, Mays Street/ Rabbit Hill Road intersection, and the Rivery Extension. Pending the approval of the budget
amendment in January, staff will update the fund schedule to reflect the CIP Rollforward Amendment in February.
Later in the year as part of the FY2021 Budget Development Process, the Budget Office will develop year-end
projections for FY2020. This occurs in April and May. After those projections are completed, staff will add an
additional column to show those figures to the fund schedule and their proximity to budget.
Page 14 of 67
F GTEC Monthly Report
Fund Schedule as of November 30, 2019
400 - GTEC
FY2020
Budget
Beginning Fund Balance 17,130,653
Operating Revenue
FY2020
Budget
FY2020 YTD
Actuals
FY2020 YTD
Encumbrances
FY2020
Actuals % Of Budget
Interest 230,000 77,215 - 77,215 33.57%
Sales Tax 7,937,500 43,615 - 43,615 0.55%
Operating Revenue Total 8,167,500 120,830 - 120,830 1.48%
Operating Expense
FY2020
Budget
FY2020 YTD
Actuals
FY2020 YTD
Encumbrances
FY2020
Actuals % of Budget
Administrative Support 410,223 - - - 0.00%
Operating Expense Total 410,223 - - - 0.00%
FY2020 Budget
Ending Operating Fund Balance 24,887,930
Non-Operating Revenue
FY2020
Budget
FY2020 YTD
Actuals
FY2020 YTD
Encumbrances
FY2020
Actuals % Of Budget
Debt Proceeds 4,700,000 - - - 0.00%
Non-Operating Revenue Total 4,700,000 - - - 0.00%
Non-Operating Expense
FY2020
Budget
FY2020 YTD
Actuals
FY2020 YTD
Encumbrances
FY2020
Actuals % of Budget
Arterial SE1:Inner Loop/SH130 7,200,000 - - - 0.00%
Available for Projects TBD 1,984,375 - - - 0.00%
BIG C 2,000,000 - - - 0.00%
Confido 600,000 - - - 0.00%
Debt Service 3,333,921 - - - 0.00%
FM 971 / Fontana - 6,155 (6,155) - 0.00%
IH 35 / HWY29 Intersection - 14,936 (14,936) - 0.00%
Mays Street/Rabbit Hill Road - 43,527 - 43,527 0.00%
Rivery TIA Improvements 300,000 - 4,140 4,140 1.38%
SH29 1,150,000 - - - 0.00%
Non-Operating Expense Total 16,568,296 64,618 (16,950) 47,668 0.29%
FY2020 Budget
Ending Fund Balance 13,019,634
Contingency Reserve 1,984,375
Debt Service Reserve 3,225,642
Available Fund Balance 7,809,617
FY2020 Actuals
Page 15 of 67
12/12/2019 3:59 PM A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT PAGE: 1
VENDOR SET: 01 CITY OF GEORGETOWN
BANK: * ALL BANKS
DATE RANGE:11/01/2019 THRU 11/30/2019
CHECK CHECK CHECK CHECK
VENDOR I.D. NAME STATUS DATE AMOUNT DISCOUNT NO STATUS AMOUNT
C-CHECK VOID CHECK V 11/01/2019 255257
C-CHECK VOID CHECK V 11/01/2019 255258
C-CHECK VOID CHECK V 11/01/2019 255259
C-CHECK VOID CHECK V 11/01/2019 255282
1 JESSICA BOESE UNPOST
C-CHECK JESSICA BOESE UNPOST V 11/08/2019 255422 1,000.00CR
137661 MICHAEL PATROSKI
C-CHECK MICHAEL PATROSKI VOIDED V 11/08/2019 255441 82.50CR
113541 NATHANIEL WAGGONER
C-CHECK NATHANIEL WAGGONER VOIDED V 11/08/2019 255470 82.50CR
130341 SUSAN WATKINS
C-CHECK SUSAN WATKINS VOIDED V 11/08/2019 255473 82.50CR
C-CHECK VOID CHECK V 11/15/2019 255580
88841 TEXAS DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
C-CHECK TEXAS DEPT OF TRANSPORTAVOIDED V 11/22/2019 255745 9.36CR
C-CHECK VOID CHECK V 11/29/2019 255810
C-CHECK VOID CHECK V 11/29/2019 255811
* * T O T A L S * * NO INVOICE AMOUNT DISCOUNTS CHECK AMOUNT
REGULAR CHECKS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
HAND CHECKS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
DRAFTS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
EFT: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
NON CHECKS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
VOID CHECKS: 12 VOID DEBITS 0.00
VOID CREDITS 1,256.86CR 1,256.86CR 0.00
TOTAL ERRORS: 0
NO INVOICE AMOUNT DISCOUNTS CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR SET: 01 BANK: * TOTALS: 12 1,256.86CR 0.00 0.00
BANK: * TOTALS: 12 1,256.86CR 0.00 0.00
Page 16 of 67
12/12/2019 3:59 PM A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT PAGE: 2
VENDOR SET: 01 CITY OF GEORGETOWN
BANK: JPM JP MORGAN CHASE
DATE RANGE:11/01/2019 THRU 11/30/2019
CHECK CHECK CHECK CHECK
VENDOR I.D. NAME STATUS DATE AMOUNT DISCOUNT NO STATUS AMOUNT
23371 GRESHARE ENTERPRISES INC
I-45890 NAME TAG - JOE CARNEY V 7/19/2019 252614 14.50
23371 GRESHARE ENTERPRISES INC
M-CHECK GRESHARE ENTERPRISES INCUNPOST V 11/07/2019 252614 14.50CR
136261 SPENSER VANBUREN
I-71919 SPENSER VANBUREN V 7/19/2019 252748 286.00
136261 SPENSER VANBUREN
M-CHECK SPENSER VANBUREN UNPOST V 11/07/2019 252748 286.00CR
127541 TIFFANY HUNTER
I-R002984 TIFFANY HUNTER V 7/26/2019 252862 169.50
127541 TIFFANY HUNTER
M-CHECK TIFFANY HUNTER UNPOST V 11/07/2019 252862 169.50CR
06711 PROGRESSIVE COMMERCIAL AQUATIC
I-IA3435 CW POOL CHEMICALS V 9/20/2019 254238
I-IA3436 CW POOL CHEMICALS V 9/20/2019 254238
I-IA3437 CT MURIATIC ACID 2019 V 9/20/2019 254238
I-IA3438 CT MURIATIC ACID 2019 V 9/20/2019 254238 6,402.48
06711 PROGRESSIVE COMMERCIAL AQUATIC
M-CHECK PROGRESSIVE COMMERCIAL AUNPOST V 11/06/2019 254238 6,402.48CR
127931 MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES INC
I-CR-10012019 MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES INC V 10/04/2019 254535 541.41
127931 MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES INC
M-CHECK MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES UNPOST V 11/06/2019 254535 541.41CR
1 CRYSTAL FONTENOT
I-201910106278 CRYSTAL FONTENOT V 10/11/2019 254597 52.82
1 CRYSTAL FONTENOT UNPOST
M-CHECK CRYSTAL FONTENOT UNPOST V 11/18/2019 254597 52.82CR
1 Oscar Lara
I-201910106287 Oscar Lara V 10/11/2019 254622 43.90
1 Oscar Lara UNPOST
M-CHECK Oscar Lara UNPOST V 11/18/2019 254622 43.90CR
Page 17 of 67
12/12/2019 3:59 PM A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT PAGE: 3
VENDOR SET: 01 CITY OF GEORGETOWN
BANK: JPM JP MORGAN CHASE
DATE RANGE:11/01/2019 THRU 11/30/2019
CHECK CHECK CHECK CHECK
VENDOR I.D. NAME STATUS DATE AMOUNT DISCOUNT NO STATUS AMOUNT
87541 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC
I-069226616-0919 NA KHA-19-001-TO R 11/01/2019 255263
400 9-0980-90-059 IH 35/ HWY 29 INTERSECTION IMPKHA-19-001-TO 2,364.00 2,364.00
1 FORSTER & GILES
I-CR-111119 FORSTER & GILES: R 11/15/2019 255549
400 9-0980-90-060 MAYS STREET/ RABBIT HILL ROAD FORSTER & GILES: 22,000.00 22,000.00
89091 RPS INFRASTRUCTURE INC
I-1019027 NA AMENDMENT #2 E 11/22/2019 999999
400 9-0980-90-044 FM 971/ FONTANA (NW BRIDGE) AMENDMENT #2 862.99 862.99
* * T O T A L S * * NO INVOICE AMOUNT DISCOUNTS CHECK AMOUNT
REGULAR CHECKS: 2 24,364.00 0.00 24,364.00
HAND CHECKS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
DRAFTS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
EFT: 1 862.99 0.00 862.99
NON CHECKS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
VOID CHECKS: 7 VOID DEBITS 0.00
VOID CREDITS 7,510.61CR 7,510.61CR 0.00
TOTAL ERRORS: 0
** G/L ACCOUNT TOTALS **
G/L ACCOUNT NAME AMOUNT
----------------------------------------------------------------------
400 9-0980-90-044 FM 971/ FONTANA (NW BRIDGE) 862.99
400 9-0980-90-059 IH 35/ HWY 29 INTERSECTION IMP 2,364.00
400 9-0980-90-060 MAYS STREET/ RABBIT HILL ROAD 22,000.00
*** FUND TOTAL *** 25,226.99
NO INVOICE AMOUNT DISCOUNTS CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR SET: 01 BANK: JPM TOTALS: 10 25,226.99 0.00 25,226.99
Page 18 of 67
12/12/2019 3:59 PM A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT PAGE: 4
VENDOR SET: 02 CITY OF GEORGETOWN
BANK: JPM JP MORGAN CHASE
DATE RANGE:11/01/2019 THRU 11/30/2019
CHECK CHECK CHECK CHECK
VENDOR I.D. NAME STATUS DATE AMOUNT DISCOUNT NO STATUS AMOUNT
10990 KLOTZ ASSOCIATES INC
I-1019026 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES R 11/22/2019 255653
400 9-0980-90-044 FM 971/ FONTANA (NW BRIDGE) PROFSSIONAL SERVICES 5,291.54 5,291.54
* * T O T A L S * * NO INVOICE AMOUNT DISCOUNTS CHECK AMOUNT
REGULAR CHECKS: 1 5,291.54 0.00 5,291.54
HAND CHECKS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
DRAFTS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
EFT: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
NON CHECKS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
VOID CHECKS: 0 VOID DEBITS 0.00
VOID CREDITS 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL ERRORS: 0
** G/L ACCOUNT TOTALS **
G/L ACCOUNT NAME AMOUNT
----------------------------------------------------------------------
400 9-0980-90-044 FM 971/ FONTANA (NW BRIDGE) 5,291.54
*** FUND TOTAL *** 5,291.54
NO INVOICE AMOUNT DISCOUNTS CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR SET: 02 BANK: JPM TOTALS: 1 5,291.54 0.00 5,291.54
BANK: JPM TOTALS: 11 30,518.53 0.00 30,518.53
REPORT TOTALS: 11 30,518.53 0.00 30,518.53
Page 19 of 67
12/12/2019 3:59 PM A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT PAGE: 5
SELECTION CRITERIA
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VENDOR SET: * - All
VENDOR: ALL
BANK CODES: All
FUNDS: Include: 400
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHECK SELECTION
CHECK RANGE: 000000 THRU 999999
DATE RANGE: 11/01/2019 THRU 11/30/2019
CHECK AMOUNT RANGE: 0.00 THRU 999,999,999.99
INCLUDE ALL VOIDS: YES
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRINT OPTIONS
SEQUENCE: CHECK NUMBER
PRINT TRANSACTIONS: YES
PRINT G/L: YES
UNPOSTED ONLY: NO
EXCLUDE UNPOSTED: NO
MANUAL ONLY: NO
STUB COMMENTS: NO
REPORT FOOTER: NO
CHECK STATUS: NO
PRINT STATUS: * - All
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 20 of 67
City of Georgetown, Texas
Transportation Enhancement Corp
December 18, 2019
S UB J E C T:
C onsideration and pos s ible approval of the minutes from the November 20, 2019 G T EC Board Meeting. -
- David Morgan - G eneral Manager, G T EC Board
IT E M S UMMARY:
F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
N/A
S UB MIT T E D B Y:
David Morgan - G eneral Manager, G T EC Board
AT TAC H ME N T S:
Description Type
GTEC Minutes 11-20-19 Backup Material
Page 21 of 67
Minutes of the Meeting of
Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation
and the Governing Body of the
City of Georgetown, Texas
Wednesday, November 20, 2019
The Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation of the City of Georgetown, Texas,
met on Wednesday, November 20, 2019.
Board Members Present: Jay Warren – President, Al Hajka, Bob Whetsell, John Marler,
Mike Triggs
Board Members Absent: Colin McGahey – Secretary, Rachael Jonrowe
Staff Present: Wayne Reed, Laurie Brewer, Michaela Dollar, Emily Koontz, Wesley Wright,
Paul Diaz
Others Present: None
Minutes
Regular Session:
(This Regular Session may, at any time, be recessed to convene an Executive Session for any
purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code 551.)
A. Call to Order: Meeting was called to order at 4:15 PM by Warren
B. Introduction of New Board Members and Visitors: No visitors.
C. Industry/CAMPO/TxDOT Updates – There were no updates. Morgan told the board that
CAMPO is doing their call for projects. The city is going to be bringing some large
projects to Council to get on the CAMPO list to make sure that they are eligible for
funding. TxDOT advance funding agreement is currently under review at legal.
D. Update of current projects - Wesley Wright, P.E., Systems Engineering Director/Michael
Hallmark, CIP Manager. Wright gave updates which are included in the packet. Warren
asked and Wright replied that the Williams Dr right turn on to Rivery was waiting on
utilities to be moved. They have now been moved and the contractor is moving in.
E. Presentation of Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation preliminary
monthly financial reports for October 2019. Diaz gave the reports which are included in
the packet.
Page 22 of 67
Legislative Regular Agenda:
F. Consideration and possible approval of the minutes from the June 19, 2019 GTEC Board
Meeting. -- David Morgan - General Manager, GTEC Board MOTION by Hajka,
SECOND by Warren to approve the minutes with a corrected spelling from Cadodo to
Kubota in item G. APPROVED 5-0-2 (Jonrowe and McGahey – absent)
G. Discussion Set a Public hearing for December 18, 2019 by the Georgetown
Transportation Enhancement Corporation (GTEC) regarding the expenditure of 4B sales
tax funds for the proposed Confido III Project. Leigh Wallace, Finance Director, COG,
Manager, GTEC. MOTION by Marler, SECOND by Hajka. APPROVED 5-0-2
(Jonrowe and McGahey – absent)
H. Set a Public hearing for December 18, 2019 by the Georgetown Transportation
Enhancement Corporation (GTEC) regarding the expenditure of 4B sales tax funds for
the proposed Costco Wholesale Corporation Project. Leigh Wallace, Finance Director,
COG, Manager, GTEC. MOTION by Marler, SECOND by Hajka. APPROVED 5-0-2
(Jonrowe and McGahey – absent)
I. EXECUTIVE SESSION
In compliance with the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, Government Code, Vernon's
Texas Codes, Annotated, the item listed below will be discussed in closed session and is
subject to action in the regular session.
Sec. 551.087 Deliberation Regarding Economic Development Negotiations
Extension of Aviation Drive - Michaela Dollar, Economic Development Director
J. Action from Executive Session – Extension of Aviation Drive. MOTION by Marler,
SECOND by Whetsell. APPROVED 5-0-2 (Jonrowe and McGahey – absent)
ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION by Marler, second by Hajka to adjourn the meeting. APPROVED 5-0-2 (Jonrowe and
McGahey – absent)
Meeting adjourned at 4:42 PM.
Adjournment
Approved: Attest:
Page 23 of 67
_______________________ ________________________
Jay Warren- President Colin McGahey – Secretary
_________________________
Emily Koontz – Board Liaison
Page 24 of 67
City of Georgetown, Texas
Transportation Enhancement Corp
December 18, 2019
S UB J E C T:
C onsideration and pos s ible ac tion on an Agreement for a Local O n-S ystem Improvement P roject with the
Texas Department of Transportation (T xDO T ) for signal and roadway improvements along S H29, just
eas t of I H35 -- Wesley Wright, P E, S ystems Engineering Direc tor
IT E M S UMMARY:
P revious ly, the G eorgetown Trans portation Enhanc ement C orporation (G T EC ) agreed to fund a traffic
s ignal reloc ation and various roadway improvement on S H29, jus t eas t of I H35 to help improve the flow of
traffic near the existing HEB and Wolf C rossing retail developments. In addition to shifting the traffic
s ignal east, promoting better flow through all inters ections in the immediate area, a rais ed median and
multiple turn lanes are propos ed with the project.
T he proposed agreement dictates terms by which T xDO T will allow these improvements within their right-
of-way. T he document is a T xDO T standard, very s imilar to others we have c ompleted and worked under
in the past. T he doc ument has been reviewed by the C ity Attorney's O ffice.
S taff and our cons ulting engineer rec ommend approval of the propos ed agreement.
F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
T here is no direct c os t as s ociated with this agreement. T he C ity, spec ifically G T EC , has agreed to fund all
cons truction costs .
S UB MIT T E D B Y:
Wesley Wright
AT TAC H ME N T S:
Description Type
Agreement - SH29 Signal Relocate Backup Material
Page 25 of 67
CSJ # 0337-01-047
District # 14-AUS
Code Chart 64 # 16000
Project Name SH 29 at Wolf Crossing Traffic
Signal Relocation
Page 1 of 7
LOSA Rev 07/17/2019
STATE OF TEXAS §
COUNTY OF TRAVIS §
AGREEMENT
For A
LOCAL ON-SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
THIS AGREEMENT (Agreement) is made by and between the State of Texas, acting by and through
the Texas Department of Transportation called the “State”, and the City of Georgetown, acting by
and through its duly authorized officials, called the “Local Government.” The State and Local
Government shall be collectively referred to as “the parties” hereinafter.
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, the Texas Transportation Code, Section 201.103 establishes that the State shall design,
construct and operate a system of highways in cooperation with local governments and Section
222.052 authorizes the Texas Transportation Commission to accept contributions from political
subdivisions for development and construction of public roads and the state highway system within
the political subdivision; and
WHEREAS, the Texas Transportation Commission passed Minute Order Number 115550, authorizing
the State to accept Local Government funded projects performed on the state highway system. The
project covered by this Agreement includes only work within the state right of way as described in the
Agreement, Article 2, Scope of Work (Project); and,
WHEREAS, the Governing Body of the Local Government has approved entering into this Agreement
by resolution, ordinance, or commissioners court order dated {Enter Date of Resolution}, which is
attached to and made a part of this Agreement as Attachment A, Resolution, Ordinance, or
Commissioners Court Order (Attachment A) for the improvement covered by this Agreement. A map
showing the Project location appears in Attachment B, Project Location Map (Attachment B), which is
attached to and made a part of this Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual covenants and agreements
of the parties, to be by them respectively kept and performed as set forth in this Agreement, it is
agreed as follows:
AGREEMENT
1. Period of the Agreement
This Agreement becomes effective when signed by the last party whose signing makes the
Agreement fully executed. This Agreement shall remain in effect until the completed Project is
accepted by the State or unless terminated as provided below.
Page 26 of 67
CSJ # 0337-01-047
District # 14-AUS
Code Chart 64 # 16000
Project Name SH 29 at Wolf Crossing Traffic
Signal Relocation
Page 2 of 7
LOSA Rev 07/17/2019
2. Scope of Work
The Project consists of relocating the traffic signal on SH 29 east of its current location at HEB
main entrance, to the new Wolf Crossing Entrance/HEB back entrance in the City of
Georgetown, Texas.
3. Local Project Sources and Uses of Funds
A. The total estimated cost of the Project is shown in Attachment C, Local On-System
Improvement Project Budget (Attachment C), which is attached to and made a part of
this Agreement. The estimated funds from the Local Government are shown in
Attachment C. The State will pay for no Project costs performed by or managed by
Local Government under this Agreement.
B. Attachment C shows how necessary resources for completing the Project will be
provided by major cost categories. These categories may include but are not limited
to: (1) costs of real property (right of way); (2) costs of utility work; (3) costs of
environmental assessment and remediation; (4) cost of preliminary engineering and
design; (5) cost of construction and construction management; and (6) any other
Project costs.
C. The Local Government shall be solely responsible for all of its costs associated with
the Project provided for in this Agreement. The Local Government shall be responsible
for cost overruns for the Project in excess of the estimated amount to be paid by the
Local Government on Attachment C. The Local Government shall also be responsible
for direct and indirect costs incurred by the State related to performance of this project
if so indicated on Attachment C. If the State determines that the on-system
improvements are of significant operational benefit to the State, the State may waive its
direct or indirect costs. The State’s waiver of its direct or indirect costs shall be
indicated on Attachment C by showing the State as responsible for these costs. When
the Local Government is responsible for the State’s direct or indirect costs, the amount
indicated on Attachment C is a fixed fee and not subject to adjustment except through
the execution of an amendment to this Agreement.
D. Prior to the performance of any engineering review work by the State, the Local
Government shall pay to the State the amount of direct and indirect State costs
specified in Attachment C.
E. Whenever funds are paid by the Local Government to the State under this Agreement,
the Local Government shall remit a check or warrant made payable to the “Texas
Department of Transportation” or may use the State’s Automated Clearing House
(ACH) system for electronic transfer of funds in accordance with instructions provided
by TxDOT’s Financial Management Division. The funds shall be deposited and
managed by the State and are not refundable.
F. The Local Government will begin construction on the Project within 12 months after
execution of the Agreement.
G. The Local Government will complete construction and receive the State’s acceptance
of the project within 6 months after the date the State authorizes in writing for the Local
Government to commence construction of the Project.
H. If the Local Government chooses not to or fails to complete the work once construction
on the Project commences, the State may terminate this Agreement in accordance with
paragraph 4.C. below. The State may address unfinished construction work as it
Page 27 of 67
CSJ # 0337-01-047
District # 14-AUS
Code Chart 64 # 16000
Project Name SH 29 at Wolf Crossing Traffic
Signal Relocation
Page 3 of 7
LOSA Rev 07/17/2019
determines necessary to protect the interests of the State, which includes returning the
Project area to its original condition or completing the work using State forces or
contractors. The Local Government shall pay all costs incurred by the State under this
provision.
4. Termination of this Agreement
This Agreement shall remain in effect until the Project is completed and accepted by the State,
unless:
A. The Agreement is terminated in writing with the mutual consent of the parties;
B. The State terminates the Agreement in writing due to the Local Government’s failure to
comply with paragraphs 3.F or 3.G; or
C. The Agreement is terminated by one party because of a breach, in which case any cost
incurred because of the breach shall be paid by the breaching party.
5. Amendments
Amendments to this Agreement due to changes in the character of the work, terms of the
Agreement, or responsibilities of the parties relating to the Project may be enacted through a
mutually agreed upon, written amendment. Amendments may not include the addition of State
or Federal funds. If any funds other than Local Government funds are proposed, this
Agreement must be terminated and a new agreement with appropriate terms and clauses
executed in its place.
6. Remedies
This Agreement shall not be considered as specifying the exclusive remedy for any Agreement
default, but all remedies existing at law and in equity may be availed of by either party to this
Agreement and shall be cumulative.
7. Architectural and Engineering Services
The Local Government has responsibility for the performance of architectural and engineering
services. The engineering plans shall be developed in accordance with the applicable State’s
Standard Specifications for Construction and Maintenance of Highways, Streets and Bridges
and the special specifications and special provisions related to it. The Project design shall, at
a minimum conform to applicable State manuals.
The State shall review the plans, specifications, and estimates provided by the Local
Government upon completion or at any time deemed necessary by the State. Should the
State determine that the complete plans, specifications, and estimates for the Project are not
acceptable, the Local Government shall correct the design documents to the State’s
satisfaction. Should additional specifications or data be required by the State, the Local
Government shall redesign the plans and specifications to the State’s satisfaction. The costs
for additional work on the plans, specifications, and estimates shall be borne by the Local
Government.
8. Environmental Assessment and Mitigation
Development of a transportation project must comply with applicable environmental laws. The
Local Government is responsible for:
Page 28 of 67
CSJ # 0337-01-047
District # 14-AUS
Code Chart 64 # 16000
Project Name SH 29 at Wolf Crossing Traffic
Signal Relocation
Page 4 of 7
LOSA Rev 07/17/2019
A. The identification and assessment of any environmental problems associated with the
development of the Project governed by this Agreement.
B. The cost of any environmental problem’s mitigation and remediation.
C. Providing any public meetings or public hearings required for development of all
required environmental documents and obtaining all required permits and approvals.
D. The preparation of documents required for the environmental clearance of the Project.
Before the advertisement for bids, the Local Government shall provide to the State written
documentation from the appropriate regulatory agency or agencies that all environmental
clearances and approvals have been obtained.
9. Right of Way and Real Property
The Local Government shall acquire all required right of way and necessary right of entry for
performance of the Project in accordance with applicable requirements of the Texas
Department of Transportation Right of Way Manual, State law, and Federal law governing the
acquisition of real property including but not limited to Title II and Title III of the Uniform
Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 Title 42 U.S.C.A.
Section 4601 et seq. Right of way acquired for improvements to the state highway system
shall be acquired in the name of the State. Local Government shall provide right of entry to
State personnel and its authorized representatives to areas off the state highway system
throughout the duration of the Project for the State to perform inspection and oversight of the
Project.
10. Utilities
The Local Government shall be responsible for the adjustment, removal, or relocation of utility
facilities for the Project in accordance with applicable State and Federal laws, regulations,
rules, policies, and procedures, including any cost to the State of a delay resulting from the
Local Government’s failure to ensure that utility facilities are adjusted, removed, or relocated
before the scheduled beginning of construction. The Local Government will not be reimbursed
for the cost of required utility work. The Local Government must obtain advance approval for
any variance from established procedures.
11. Compliance with Texas Accessibility Standards and ADA
Local Government shall ensure that the plans for and the construction of the Project are in
compliance with standards issued or approved by the Texas Department of Licensing and
Regulation (TDLR) as meeting or consistent with minimum accessibility requirements of the
Americans with Disabilities Act (P.L. 101-336) (ADA).
12. Construction Responsibilities
A. The Local Government shall advertise for construction bids, issue bid proposals,
receive and tabulate the bids, and award and administer the contract for construction of
the Project. Administration of the contract includes the responsibility for construction
engineering and for issuance of any change orders, supplemental agreements,
amendments, or additional work orders that may become necessary subsequent to the
award of the construction contract. Project plans and specifications for improvements
on the state highway system must be approved by the State prior to advertising for
Page 29 of 67
CSJ # 0337-01-047
District # 14-AUS
Code Chart 64 # 16000
Project Name SH 29 at Wolf Crossing Traffic
Signal Relocation
Page 5 of 7
LOSA Rev 07/17/2019
construction. Upon selection of a contractor and prior to commencing construction
within the state highway system right of way, the Local Government shall request and
obtain written authorization to commence construction of the Project from the State.
The Local Government will supervise and inspect all work performed hereunder and
provide such engineering inspection and testing services as may be required to ensure
that the construction is accomplished in accordance with the approved plans and
specifications. All construction change orders impacting the proposed improvements,
traffic control, environmental mitigation, or drainage on the state highway system
require written pre-approval by the State prior to execution by the Local Government.
B. Upon completion of the Project, the Local Government will issue and sign a
“Notification of Completion” acknowledging the Project’s construction completion. A
copy will be provided to the State prior to State’s final acceptance of the improvements.
C. Prior to the State’s acceptance of the improvements on the state highway system,
Local Government shall furnish to the State written certification from a Texas
Registered Professional Engineer that the Project was constructed in substantial
compliance with the Project’s plans, specifications, and quality assurance
requirements.
13. Project Maintenance
After Local Government completion of the work and acceptance by the State, the State
will be responsible for maintenance of the improvements within the state highway
system right of way outside the boundaries of an incorporated city. This obligation may
be fulfilled through other agreements signed by the State.
14. Notices
All notices to either party shall be delivered personally or sent by certified or U.S. mail,
postage prepaid, addressed to that party at the following address:
Local Government
City of Georgetown
ATTN: Mayor
113 E. Eighth Street
Georgetown, Texas 78626
State
Director of Contract Services
Texas Department of Transportation
125 E. 11th Street
Austin, Texas 78701
All notices shall be deemed given on the date delivered in person or deposited in the mail,
unless otherwise provided by this Agreement. Either party may change the above address by
sending written notice of the change to the other party. Either party may request in writing that
notices shall be delivered personally or by certified U.S. mail, and that request shall be carried
out by the other party.
Page 30 of 67
CSJ # 0337-01-047
District # 14-AUS
Code Chart 64 # 16000
Project Name SH 29 at Wolf Crossing Traffic
Signal Relocation
Page 6 of 7
LOSA Rev 07/17/2019
15. Legal Construction
If one or more of the provisions contained in this Agreement shall for any reason be held
invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality, or unenforceability
shall not affect any other provisions and this Agreement shall be construed as if it did not
contain the invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provision.
16. Responsibilities of the Parties
The State and the Local Government agree that neither party is an agent, servant, or
employee of the other party, and each party agrees it is responsible for its individual acts and
deeds as well as the acts and deeds of its contractors, employees, representatives, and
agents.
17. Ownership of Documents
Upon completion or termination of this Agreement, copies of all documents and data prepared
under this Agreement by the Local Government for improvements within the state highway
system right of way shall be provided to the State prior to State acceptance of the Project
without restriction or limitation on their further use. The originals shall remain the property of
the Local Government. At the request of the State, the Local Government shall submit any
Project information required by the State in the format directed by the State.
18. Compliance with Laws
The parties shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws, statutes, ordinances, rules and
regulations, and the orders and decrees of any courts or administrative bodies or tribunals in
any manner affecting the performance of this Agreement. When required, the Local
Government shall furnish the State with satisfactory proof of this compliance.
19. Sole Agreement
This Agreement constitutes the sole and only agreement between the parties and supersedes
any prior understandings or written or oral agreements respecting the Agreement’s subject
matter.
20. Inspection of Books and Records
The parties to this Agreement shall maintain all books, documents, papers, accounting
records, and other documentation relating to costs incurred and engineering inspection and
testing services performed under this Agreement and shall make such materials available to
the State and the Local Government or their duly authorized representatives for review and
inspection at its office during the Agreement period and for seven (7) years from the date of
completion of work defined under this Agreement or until any impending litigation or claims are
resolved. Additionally, the State and the Local Government and their duly authorized
representatives shall have access to all the governmental records that are directly applicable
to this Agreement for the purpose of making audits, examinations, excerpts, and
transcriptions.
21. Insurance
Before beginning work on the state highway system, the Local Government and its contractor
performing the work shall provide the State with a fully executed copy of the State's Form 1560
Page 31 of 67
CSJ # 0337-01-047
District # 14-AUS
Code Chart 64 # 16000
Project Name SH 29 at Wolf Crossing Traffic
Signal Relocation
Page 7 of 7
LOSA Rev 07/17/2019
Certificate of Insurance verifying the existence of coverage in the amounts and types specified
on the Certificate of Insurance for all persons and entities working on state right of way. Self-
insurance documentation acceptable to the State may be substituted for all or part of the
coverage’s required for the Local Government. This coverage shall be maintained until all work
on the state right of way is complete. If coverage is not maintained, all work on state right of
way shall cease immediately, and the State may recover damages and all costs of completing
the work.
22. Pertinent Non-Discrimination Authorities
During the performance of this Agreement, the Local Government, for itself, its assignees, and
successors in interest agree to comply with all applicable Federal and State nondiscrimination
statutes and authorities.
23. Signatory Warranty
Each signatory warrants that the signatory has necessary authority to execute this Agreement
on behalf of the entity represented.
Each party is signing this agreement on the date stated under that party’s signature.
THE STATE OF TEXAS THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT
Signature Signature
Kenneth Stewart
Dale Ross
Typed or Printed Name Typed or Printed Name
Director of Contract Services
Mayor
Typed or Printed Title Typed or Printed Title
Date Date
Page 32 of 67
CSJ # 0337-01-047
District # 14-AUS
Code Chart 64 # 16000
Project Name SH 29 at Wolf Crossing Traffic
Signal Relocation
Page 1 of 1
LOSA Attachment A
ATTACHMENT A
RESOLUTION, ORDINANCE, OR COMMISSIONERS COURT ORDER
{Insert Local Government Resolution, Ordinance, or Commissioners Court Order}
Page 33 of 67
CSJ # 0337-01-047
District # 14-AUS
Code Chart 64 # 16000
Project Name SH 29 at Wolf Crossing Traffic
Signal Relocation
Page 1 of 1
LOSA Attachment B
ATTACHMENT B
PROJECT LOCATION MAP
Page 34 of 67
CSJ # 0337-01-047
District # 14-AUS
Code Chart 64 # 16000
Project Name SH 29 at Wolf Crossing Traffic
Signal Relocation
Page 1 of 1
LOSA Attachment C
ATTACHMENT C
LOCAL ON-SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROJECT BUDGET
(Locally Funded and Performed Project)
The Local Government is responsible for 100% of the costs allocated to it as described below,
including overruns.
Description Estimated Costs Subtotals
PROJECT PHASES: Work performed by the Local Government or its Consultant or Contractor
Environmental $
Right of Way $
Engineering $30,000
Utility Work $
Construction $400,000
Subtotal for Project Phases $430,000
DIRECT STATE COSTS:
Paid By: ☐☐☐☐ Local Government State
Environmental $2,150
Right of Way $538
Engineering $3,225
Utility Work $538
Construction $15,050
Subtotal for Direct State Costs $21,501
INDIRECT STATE COSTS: Paid By: ☐☐☐☐ Local Government State
Subtotal for Indirect State Costs
(4.52%) $19,436
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT $470,937
$0.00
Fixed price amount of payment by the Local Government to the State for
the State’s direct and indirect costs as stated in Article 3, C and D of the
Agreement.
Page 35 of 67
City of Georgetown, Texas
Transportation Enhancement Corp
December 18, 2019
S UB J E C T:
P ublic hearing by the G eorgetown Transportation Enhancement C orporation (G T EC ) regarding the
expenditure of 4B sales tax funds for the propos ed C onfido I I I P rojec t. – Leigh Wallace, F inanc e
Director, C O G , F inanc e Manager, G T EC .
IT E M S UMMARY:
S tate Law (Loc al G overnment C ode 505.159) requires G T EC to provide public notice and hold a public
hearing on the proposed projects to be funded with the 4B sales tax. T he required notic e was publis hed in
the Williamson C ounty S un on Dec 11, 2019.
T he public hearing will be c onducted by the G T EC Board of Directors .
F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
$600,000 to be funded on or before F Y2022
S UB MIT T E D B Y:
AT TAC H ME N T S:
Description Type
Proof of Public Notice Backup Material
GTEC Findings of Project Eligibility Backup Material
Pres entation Backup Material
Page 36 of 67
GEORGETOWN TRANSPORTATION
ENHANCEMENT CORPORATION
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Wednesday, December 18, 2019 - 3:30pm
Georgetown Municipal Complex
300-1 Industrial Avenue – Georgetown, TX
In accordance with Local Government Code 505.159, the Georgetown
Transportation Enhancement Corporation will hold a public hearing re-
garding the expenditures of 4B sales taxes not to exceed Fiscal Year 2025
proposed transportation improvement plan.
Proposed projects to be funded on or before FY2025 Estimated Amount
Costco Wholesale Corp. $ 2,000,000
Confido III $ 600,000
Total $ 2,600,000
Page 37 of 67
1
GTEC (4B)
Analysis of Expenditures under the ACT
Question 1
Is the expenditure for “streets, roads, drainage and other related transportation system improvements,
including the payment of maintenance and operating expenses associated with such authorized
projects?”(Ballot Language)
Question 2
Is the expenditure for “streets, roads, drainage and other related transportation system improvements,
including the payment of maintenance and operation expenses associated with such authorized projects” an
authorized “Cost” as that term is defined in the Act {Act 2(4)} (see below definition of “Cost under the Act):
a. Acquisition, cleanup, construction, reconstruction, improvement, expansion, including the cost of
acquisition of all land, rights-of-way, property rights, easements and interests.
b. Machinery and equipment, financing charges, inventory, raw materials and other supplies.
c. Research and development costs.
d. Interest prior to and during construction and for one year after completion of construction whether or
not capitalized.
e. Necessary reserve funds.
f. Cost of estimates and of engineering and legal services.
g. Plans.
h. Specifications.
i. Surveys.
j. Estimates of cost and revenue.
k. Other expenses necessary or incident to determining the feasibility and practicability of acquiring,
cleaning, constructing, reconstructing, improving, and expanding any such project.
l. Administrative expense or such expense as may be necessary or incident to the acquisition, cleanup,
construction, reconstruction, improvement and expansion thereof, the placing of the same in operation
and the financing or refinancing of any such project.
m. Refunding of any outstanding obligations, mortgages, or advances issued, made or given by any person
for any of the aforementioned costs.
Page 38 of 67
2
Question 3
Is the expenditure for “streets, roads, drainage and other related transportation system improvements,
including the payment of maintenance and operation expenses associated with such authorized projects” an
authorized project related to an authorized “Project” as defined in the Act (see below definition of “Project
under the Act):
a. Targeted infrastructure and improvements (one or more) (limited to the ballot language to streets, roads,
drainage and other related transportation system improvements) that are for the creation and retention of
primary jobs{defined in Section 2(17) of the Act as jobs available at a company for which a majority of the
products or services of that company ultimately exported to regional, statewide, national or international
markets infusing new dollars into the location economy, and that are in one of the following NAICS sectors:
111 (crop production); 112 (animal production); 113 (forestry and logging); 11411 (commercial fishing); 115
(support activities for agriculture and forestry); 211 to 213 (mining); 221 (utilities); 311 to 339
(manufacturing); 42 (wholesale trade); 48 and 49 (transportation and warehousing); 51 (excluding 512131
and 5121332) (information (excluding movie theatres and drive in theatres)); 523-525 (securities,
commodity contracts, and other financial investments and related activities; insurance carriers and related
activities; funds, trusts and other financial vehicles); 5413, 5415, 5416, 5417, and 5419 (scientific research
and development services; 551 (management of companies and enterprises); 56142 (telephone call centers);
922140 (correctional institutions), or 928110 (National Security for the corresponding index entries for
Armed Forces, Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, and Military Bases)} and that are found by the board
of directors to be required and suitable for the development, retention or expansion of manufacturing and
industrial facilities, research and development facilities, military facilities, including closed and realigned
military bases, transportation facilities (included but not limited to airports, ports, mass commuting
facilities, and parking facilities), sewage or solid waste disposal facilities, recycling facilities, air or water
pollution control facilities, facilities for the furnishing of water to the general public, distribution centers,
primary jobs training facilities for the use of institutions of higher education; and regional or national
corporate headquarters facilities [Act 2(11)(A)]; or
b. Job training required or suitable for the promotion of the development and expansion of business
enterprises and other enterprises described by this Act as provided by Section 38 of the Act, which requires
a business enterprise offering job training to commit in writing to create new jobs that pay wages that are
at least equal to the prevailing water for applicable occupation in the local labor market area, or increase
its payroll to pay wages that are at least equal to the prevailing wage for the applicable occupation in the
local labor market area {Act 2(11)(B)]; or
c. Infrastructure necessary to promote or develop new or expanded business enterprises limited to streets,
and roads, rail spurs, water and sewer utilities, electric utilities, gas utilities, drainage, site improvements
and related improvements, and telecommunications and internet improvements and beach remediation
along the Gulf of Mexico [Act 2(11)(C)]; or
d. Land, buildings, equipment, facilities, improvements, and expenditures found by the board of directors to
be required or suitable for the use for a career center, if the area to be benefited by the career center in not
located in the taxing jurisdiction of a junior college district [Act 2(11)(D)}]; or
Page 39 of 67
3
e. Infrastructure, improvements, land acquisition, buildings, or expenditures that are for the creation or
retention of primary jobs for NAICS Sector 928110 (National Security, for the corresponding index entries
for the Armed Forces, Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, and Military Bases) and that are found by
the board of directors to be required or suitable for prompting or supporting military bases in active use
to prevent the possible future closure or realignment of the base; attracting new military missions to a
military base in active use; or redeveloping a military base that has been closed or realigned. [Act 2(11)(_)]
f. Professional and amateur (including children’s) sports, athletic, entertainment, tourist, convention, and
public park purposes and events, including stadiums, ball parks, auditoriums, amphitheaters, concert
halls, parks and park facilities, open space improvements, museums, exhibition facilities, and related store,
restaurant, concession, and automobile parking facilities, related transportation facilities, and related
roads, streets, water and sewer facilities, and other related improvements that enhance any of those items.
[Act 4B(a)(2)(A)]; or
g. Promote or develop new or expanded business enterprises that create or retain primary jobs, including a
project to provide public safety facilities, streets and road, drainage and related improvements, demolition
of existing structures, general municipally owned improvements, as well as any improvements or facilities
that are related to any of those projects and any other project that the board in its discretion determines
promotes or develops new or expanded business enterprises that create and retain primary jobs [Act
4B(a)(2)(B)]; or
h. Required or suitable for the promotion of development and expansion of affordable housing as defined by
42 U.S.C. Section 12745 [Act 4B(a)(2)(C)]; or
i. Required or suitable for the development or improvement of water supply facilities including dams,
transmission lines, well field developments, and other water supply alternatives. [NOTE: Only if
approved by the voters at a special election.] Act 4B(a)(2)(D), 4B(a-5)(1) and (2).]
j. Required or suitable for the development and institution of water or for the development and institution
of water conservation programs, including incentives to install water-saving plumbing fixtures,
educational programs, brush control programs and programs to replace malfunctioning or leaking water
lines and other water facilities. [NOTE; Only is approved by the voters at a special election) Act 4B(a)(2)(E),
4B(a-5)(1) and (2).];
k. Required or suitable for the development, retention, or expansion of business enterprises if the project is
undertaken by a corporation created by an eligible city that has not for each of the preceding two years
received more than $50,000 in revenues from sales and use tax imposed under this section, and the
governing body which has authorized the project by adopting a resolution at least two separate reading
conducted at least on week apart. [Act 4B(a)(2)(F)]
Question 4
Did the Board of Directors of GTEC make specific findings with regard to the type of expenditure, whether
it was within the definition of “Cost”; and what type of “Project” it relates to?
***************
THE ANSWERS TO ALL OF THE FOUR
MAIN QUESTIONS ABOVE MUST BE
“YES” IN ORDER FOR THE EXPENDITURE
OF GTEC FUNDS TO BE PROPER UNDER
THE BALLOT LANGUAGE AND THE ACT.
***************
Page 40 of 67
GTEC Public Hearing
Costco Wholesale
December 18, 2019
Page 41 of 67
Confido Project Background
•Discussed with GTEC in fall 2018
•Land adjacent to the portion of the airport
property identified as future nonaviation
industrial development in the Airport
Master Plan update
Page 42 of 67
Confido Project Background
Page 43 of 67
Confido Development Plans
•Developer has purchased property for a
business park development
•Plans include a collector level access road
to airport property
•Road allows access to future nonaviation
industrial development on airport
•Creates “shovel-ready” sites for industrial
development
Page 44 of 67
Development Plans
Page 45 of 67
Access Road Costs
•Total cost of the public access road and
utilities is $1,700,000
•City will reimburse up to $1,200,000 for the
cost of the road
–$600,000 from GTEC
–$600,000 from GEDCO
•Must complete construction in three years
•Approved by Council on February 26, 2019
Page 46 of 67
GTEC PROJECT ELIGIBILITY
FINDINGS PROCESS
Page 47 of 67
Question 1
Is the expenditure for “streets, roads, drainage and
other related transportation system improvements,
including the payment of maintenance and operating
expenses associated with such authorized projects?”
YES
Page 48 of 67
Question 2
Is the expenditure for “streets, roads, drainage and
other related transportation system improvements,
including the payment of maintenance and operation
expenses associated with such authorized projects” an
authorized “Cost” as that term is defined in the Act {Act
2(4)}?
Yes –A) Acquisition, cleanup, construction,
reconstruction, improvement, expansion, including the
cost of acquisition of all land, rights-of-way, property
rights, easements and interests.
Page 49 of 67
Question 3
Is the expenditure for “streets, roads, drainage and
other related transportation system improvements,
including the payment of maintenance and operation
expenses associated with such authorized projects” an
authorized projects” related to an authorized “Project”
as defined in the Act (see below definition of “Project
under the Act):
Yes –A) Targeted infrastructure and improvements
(one or more) … that are for the creation and retention
of primary jobs …
Page 50 of 67
Question 4
Did the Board of Directors of GTEC make specific
findings with regard to the type of expenditure, whether
it was within the definition of “Cost”; and what type of
“Project” it relates to?
YES
Page 51 of 67
City of Georgetown, Texas
Transportation Enhancement Corp
December 18, 2019
S UB J E C T:
P ublic hearing by the G eorgetown Transportation Enhancement C orporation (G T EC ) regarding the
expenditure of 4B sales tax funds for the propos ed C ostco W holes ale C orp P roject. – Leigh Wallac e,
F inance Director, C O G , F inanc e Manager, G T EC .
IT E M S UMMARY:
S tate Law (Loc al G overnment C ode 505.159) requires G T EC to provide public notice and hold a public
hearing on the proposed projects to be funded with the 4B sales tax. T he required notic e was publis hed in
the Williamson C ounty S un on Dec 11, 2019.
T he public hearing will be c onducted by the G T EC Board of Directors .
F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
$2,000,000 to be funded on or before F Y2025
S UB MIT T E D B Y:
AT TAC H ME N T S:
Description Type
Proof of Public Notice Backup Material
GTEC Findings of Project Eligibility Backup Material
Pres entation Backup Material
Page 52 of 67
GEORGETOWN TRANSPORTATION
ENHANCEMENT CORPORATION
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Wednesday, December 18, 2019 - 3:30pm
Georgetown Municipal Complex
300-1 Industrial Avenue – Georgetown, TX
In accordance with Local Government Code 505.159, the Georgetown
Transportation Enhancement Corporation will hold a public hearing re-
garding the expenditures of 4B sales taxes not to exceed Fiscal Year 2025
proposed transportation improvement plan.
Proposed projects to be funded on or before FY2025 Estimated Amount
Costco Wholesale Corp. $ 2,000,000
Confido III $ 600,000
Total $ 2,600,000
Page 53 of 67
1
GTEC (4B)
Analysis of Expenditures under the ACT
Question 1
Is the expenditure for “streets, roads, drainage and other related transportation system improvements,
including the payment of maintenance and operating expenses associated with such authorized
projects?”(Ballot Language)
Question 2
Is the expenditure for “streets, roads, drainage and other related transportation system improvements,
including the payment of maintenance and operation expenses associated with such authorized projects” an
authorized “Cost” as that term is defined in the Act {Act 2(4)} (see below definition of “Cost under the Act):
a. Acquisition, cleanup, construction, reconstruction, improvement, expansion, including the cost of
acquisition of all land, rights-of-way, property rights, easements and interests.
b. Machinery and equipment, financing charges, inventory, raw materials and other supplies.
c. Research and development costs.
d. Interest prior to and during construction and for one year after completion of construction whether or
not capitalized.
e. Necessary reserve funds.
f. Cost of estimates and of engineering and legal services.
g. Plans.
h. Specifications.
i. Surveys.
j. Estimates of cost and revenue.
k. Other expenses necessary or incident to determining the feasibility and practicability of acquiring,
cleaning, constructing, reconstructing, improving, and expanding any such project.
l. Administrative expense or such expense as may be necessary or incident to the acquisition, cleanup,
construction, reconstruction, improvement and expansion thereof, the placing of the same in operation
and the financing or refinancing of any such project.
m. Refunding of any outstanding obligations, mortgages, or advances issued, made or given by any person
for any of the aforementioned costs.
Page 54 of 67
2
Question 3
Is the expenditure for “streets, roads, drainage and other related transportation system improvements,
including the payment of maintenance and operation expenses associated with such authorized projects” an
authorized project related to an authorized “Project” as defined in the Act (see below definition of “Project
under the Act):
a. Targeted infrastructure and improvements (one or more) (limited to the ballot language to streets, roads,
drainage and other related transportation system improvements) that are for the creation and retention of
primary jobs{defined in Section 2(17) of the Act as jobs available at a company for which a majority of the
products or services of that company ultimately exported to regional, statewide, national or international
markets infusing new dollars into the location economy, and that are in one of the following NAICS sectors:
111 (crop production); 112 (animal production); 113 (forestry and logging); 11411 (commercial fishing); 115
(support activities for agriculture and forestry); 211 to 213 (mining); 221 (utilities); 311 to 339
(manufacturing); 42 (wholesale trade); 48 and 49 (transportation and warehousing); 51 (excluding 512131
and 5121332) (information (excluding movie theatres and drive in theatres)); 523-525 (securities,
commodity contracts, and other financial investments and related activities; insurance carriers and related
activities; funds, trusts and other financial vehicles); 5413, 5415, 5416, 5417, and 5419 (scientific research
and development services; 551 (management of companies and enterprises); 56142 (telephone call centers);
922140 (correctional institutions), or 928110 (National Security for the corresponding index entries for
Armed Forces, Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, and Military Bases)} and that are found by the board
of directors to be required and suitable for the development, retention or expansion of manufacturing and
industrial facilities, research and development facilities, military facilities, including closed and realigned
military bases, transportation facilities (included but not limited to airports, ports, mass commuting
facilities, and parking facilities), sewage or solid waste disposal facilities, recycling facilities, air or water
pollution control facilities, facilities for the furnishing of water to the general public, distribution centers,
primary jobs training facilities for the use of institutions of higher education; and regional or national
corporate headquarters facilities [Act 2(11)(A)]; or
b. Job training required or suitable for the promotion of the development and expansion of business
enterprises and other enterprises described by this Act as provided by Section 38 of the Act, which requires
a business enterprise offering job training to commit in writing to create new jobs that pay wages that are
at least equal to the prevailing water for applicable occupation in the local labor market area, or increase
its payroll to pay wages that are at least equal to the prevailing wage for the applicable occupation in the
local labor market area {Act 2(11)(B)]; or
c. Infrastructure necessary to promote or develop new or expanded business enterprises limited to streets,
and roads, rail spurs, water and sewer utilities, electric utilities, gas utilities, drainage, site improvements
and related improvements, and telecommunications and internet improvements and beach remediation
along the Gulf of Mexico [Act 2(11)(C)]; or
d. Land, buildings, equipment, facilities, improvements, and expenditures found by the board of directors to
be required or suitable for the use for a career center, if the area to be benefited by the career center in not
located in the taxing jurisdiction of a junior college district [Act 2(11)(D)}]; or
Page 55 of 67
3
e. Infrastructure, improvements, land acquisition, buildings, or expenditures that are for the creation or
retention of primary jobs for NAICS Sector 928110 (National Security, for the corresponding index entries
for the Armed Forces, Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, and Military Bases) and that are found by
the board of directors to be required or suitable for prompting or supporting military bases in active use
to prevent the possible future closure or realignment of the base; attracting new military missions to a
military base in active use; or redeveloping a military base that has been closed or realigned. [Act 2(11)(_)]
f. Professional and amateur (including children’s) sports, athletic, entertainment, tourist, convention, and
public park purposes and events, including stadiums, ball parks, auditoriums, amphitheaters, concert
halls, parks and park facilities, open space improvements, museums, exhibition facilities, and related store,
restaurant, concession, and automobile parking facilities, related transportation facilities, and related
roads, streets, water and sewer facilities, and other related improvements that enhance any of those items.
[Act 4B(a)(2)(A)]; or
g. Promote or develop new or expanded business enterprises that create or retain primary jobs, including a
project to provide public safety facilities, streets and road, drainage and related improvements, demolition
of existing structures, general municipally owned improvements, as well as any improvements or facilities
that are related to any of those projects and any other project that the board in its discretion determines
promotes or develops new or expanded business enterprises that create and retain primary jobs [Act
4B(a)(2)(B)]; or
h. Required or suitable for the promotion of development and expansion of affordable housing as defined by
42 U.S.C. Section 12745 [Act 4B(a)(2)(C)]; or
i. Required or suitable for the development or improvement of water supply facilities including dams,
transmission lines, well field developments, and other water supply alternatives. [NOTE: Only if
approved by the voters at a special election.] Act 4B(a)(2)(D), 4B(a-5)(1) and (2).]
j. Required or suitable for the development and institution of water or for the development and institution
of water conservation programs, including incentives to install water-saving plumbing fixtures,
educational programs, brush control programs and programs to replace malfunctioning or leaking water
lines and other water facilities. [NOTE; Only is approved by the voters at a special election) Act 4B(a)(2)(E),
4B(a-5)(1) and (2).];
k. Required or suitable for the development, retention, or expansion of business enterprises if the project is
undertaken by a corporation created by an eligible city that has not for each of the preceding two years
received more than $50,000 in revenues from sales and use tax imposed under this section, and the
governing body which has authorized the project by adopting a resolution at least two separate reading
conducted at least on week apart. [Act 4B(a)(2)(F)]
Question 4
Did the Board of Directors of GTEC make specific findings with regard to the type of expenditure, whether
it was within the definition of “Cost”; and what type of “Project” it relates to?
***************
THE ANSWERS TO ALL OF THE FOUR
MAIN QUESTIONS ABOVE MUST BE
“YES” IN ORDER FOR THE EXPENDITURE
OF GTEC FUNDS TO BE PROPER UNDER
THE BALLOT LANGUAGE AND THE ACT.
***************
Page 56 of 67
GTEC Public Hearing
Costco Wholesale
December 18, 2019
Page 57 of 67
Costco Project Background
•2016 Retail Assessment showed over
1,000,000 SF in retail leakage
•The City has been working with Costco to
identify a location in Georgetown since
2017
•Discussed with GTEC in early 2019
Page 58 of 67
Costco Project Background
Page 59 of 67
Costco Development Plans
•Costco has received approval of a Planned
Unit Development for the site
•Site plans include two public roads that
would be constructed by Costco
•Construction must be completed within
five years
Page 60 of 67
Development Plans
Page 61 of 67
Incentive Package
•$2,000,000 infrastructure reimbursement
grant from GTEC upon the certificate of
occupancy issuance for the Costco facility
•Must complete construction within five
years
•Approved by Council on December 10, 2019
Page 62 of 67
GTEC PROJECT ELIGIBILITY
FINDINGS PROCESS
Page 63 of 67
Question 1
Is the expenditure for “streets, roads, drainage and
other related transportation system improvements,
including the payment of maintenance and operating
expenses associated with such authorized projects?”
YES
Page 64 of 67
Question 2
Is the expenditure for “streets, roads, drainage and
other related transportation system improvements,
including the payment of maintenance and operation
expenses associated with such authorized projects” an
authorized “Cost” as that term is defined in the Act {Act
2(4)}?
Yes –A) Acquisition, cleanup, construction,
reconstruction, improvement, expansion, including the
cost of acquisition of all land, rights-of-way, property
rights, easements and interests.
Page 65 of 67
Question 3
Is the expenditure for “streets, roads, drainage and
other related transportation system improvements,
including the payment of maintenance and operation
expenses associated with such authorized projects” an
authorized projects” related to an authorized “Project”
as defined in the Act (see below definition of “Project
under the Act):
Yes –C) Infrastructure necessary to promote or develop
new or expanded business enterprises…
Page 66 of 67
Question 4
Did the Board of Directors of GTEC make specific
findings with regard to the type of expenditure, whether
it was within the definition of “Cost”; and what type of
“Project” it relates to?
YES
Page 67 of 67