HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda_GTEC_03.18.2015Notice of Meeting for the
Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corp and the Governing Body
of the City of Georgetown
March 18, 2015 at 3:30 PM
at 300-1 Industrial Ave, Georgetown, TX 78626
The City of Georgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
If you require assistance in participating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the
ADA, reasonable assistance, adaptations, or accommodations will be provided upon request. Please
contact the City at least four (4) days prior to the scheduled meeting date, at (512) 930-3652 or City
Hall at 113 East 8th Street for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711.
Regular Session
(This Regular Session may, at any time, be recessed to convene an Executive Session for any purpose
authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code 551.)
A Call to Order
The Board may, at any time, recess the Regular Session to convene in Executive Session at the
request of the Chair, a Board Member, the City Manager, Assistant City Manager, General
Manager of Utilities, City Council Member, or legal counsel for any purpose authorized by the
Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code Chapter 551, and are subject to action in the
Regular Session that follows.
B Introduction of Visitors
C Industry/CAMPO/TXDOT Updates
D Discussion regarding the Project Progress Reports and Time Lines. – Bill Dryden, P.E.,
Transportation Engineer, and Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Transportation Services Director.
E Presentation of Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation monthly financial report for
February 2015. Micki Rundell, Chief Financial Officer, COG, Finance Manager GTEC.
Legislative Regular Agenda
F Consideration and possible action to appoint Board President consistent with Section 3.02 of the
GTEC Bylaws. – Jim Briggs, General Manager, GTEC Board
G Consideration and possible action to appoint Board Vice - President consistent with Section 3.02
of the GTEC Bylaws. – Jim Briggs, General Manager, GTEC Board
H Consideration and possible action to appoint Board Secretary consistent with Section 3.02 of the
GTEC Bylaws. – Jim Briggs, General Manager, GTEC Board
I Review and possible action related to the Day and Time of GTEC Board Meetings. – Jim Briggs,
General Manager, GTEC Board
J Consideration and possible action to approve minutes from the regular GTEC Board meeting held
January 21, 2015. Jim Briggs, General Manager - GTEC
K Consideration and possible action to approve Task Order BGE-15-001 with Brown and Gay
Engineers, Inc., of Austin, TX, for professional engineering services related design and
preparation of plans, specifications, and estimates for the widening and reconstruction of Airport
Road from Lakeway Drive to Aviation Drive, inclusive of intersection improvements at Lakeway
Drive and I 35 Southbound Frontage Road improvements in the amount of $485,700.00. – Bill
Dryden, P.E., Transportation Engineer, Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Transportation Services
Director and Bridget Chapman, City Attorney.
L Consideration and possible action for approval of the 2015/2016 Transportation Improvement
Program (TIP)– Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Transportation Services Director, and Nat Waggoner,
PMP®, Transportation Analyst.
Adjournment
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
I, Jessica Brettle, City Secretary for the City of Georgetown, Texas, do hereby certify that this Notice
of Meeting was posted at City Hall, 113 E. 8th Street, a place readily accessible to the general public
at all times, on the ______ day of __________________, 2015, at __________, and remained so
posted for at least 72 continuous hours preceding the scheduled time of said meeting.
____________________________________
Jessica Brettle, City Secretary
City of Georgetown, Texas
Transportation Enhancement Corp
March 18, 2015
SUBJECT:
Discussion regarding the Project Progress Reports and Time Lines. – Bill Dryden, P.E.,
Transportation Engineer, and Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Transportation Services Director.
ITEM SUMMARY:
GTEC Projects
FM 1460 ROW & Utility Relocations – Project No. 5RB
Mays Street Extension (Teravista Parkway to Westinghouse Road) – Project No. 5RI
NB Frontage Road (SS 158 to Lakeway Dr.) – Project No. 5QY
Northwest Blvd Overpass – Project No. 5QX
Rivery Boulevard Extension (Williams to Northwest Blvd) – Project 5RM
Snead Drive – Project 5QZ
Southwest Bypass – Project No. 5QCWolf Ranch Pkwy Extension – Project No. 5QW
GTEC Project Update & Status Report
GTAB Projects
Austin Avenue Bridge Evaluation and Repairs
FM 971 Realignment at Austin Avenue
FM 1460 Improvements Project
OTP Update
Sidewalk Master Plan
Southwest Bypass Project (TIP #14C)
Transit Study as Requested by City Council
Transportation Services Operations – CIP Maintenance
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None
SUBMITTED BY:
Bill Dryden, P.E., Transportation Engineer
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
March Project Updates Exhibit
GTEC Status Report Exhibit
GTAB Project Updates Exhibit
FM 1460
(Quail Valley Drive to University Drive)
Project No. 5RB TIP No. EEa, EEb & EEc
Rights‐of‐Way Acquisition and Utility Relocation
March 2015
Project Description Acquisition of ROW and relocation of utilities for the FM 1460 Project (Quail Valley Drive
to University Drive).
Purpose To have all ROWs cleared and utilities prior to TxDOT letting the project foe construction.
Project Managers Ed Polasek, AICP and Bill Dryden, P.E.
Engineer Brown and Gay Engineers, Inc.
Element Status / Issues
Design Complete
Environmental/
Archeological
Complete
Rights of Way
As of October 16th, the City has obtained
Possession and Use Agreements or have
closings completed or planned for all the
remaining FM 1460 parcels.
Section: North South
Acquired: 34 8
Pending: 0 ‐
Condemnation: 2 ‐
Total: 36 8
Utility Relocations Ongoing
Construction Bid opened August 2014
Construction scheduled to commence Spring 2015.
Other Issues AFA amendment pending reallocating authorized funding for [City] relocation
work.
Two known change orders pending – first is due to items from ROW negotiations;
second is due to proposed intersection redesign.
Mays Street Extension
(Teravista Parkway in Round Rock to Westinghouse Road)
Project No. 5RI TIP No. None
March 2015
Project Description Extend Mays Street northward from Teravista Parkway to the existing intersection with
Westinghouse Road at Rabbit Hill Road. The widening along Westinghouse Road and
Rabbit Hill Road will also be included in the schematic for additional turning lanes
to/from Westinghouse Road. Preliminary layouts for future signals and roadway
illumination will also be included. The project length along the anticipated alignment is
approximately 1.0 miles.
Purpose To complete the schematic design, define rights‐of‐way requirements and complete 30%
design.
Project Managers Bill Dryden, P.E.
Engineer CP&Y, Inc.
Element Status / Issues
Design Engineering has submitted the proposed alignment and is working on the 30%
PS&E.
Environmental/
Archeological
TBD
Rights of Way Will match City of Round Rock standard of 100 ft. within RR’s City Limits; City of
Georgetown standard of 112 ft. within our City Limits.
Utility Relocations TBD
Construction TBD
Other Issues None.
NB Frontage Road
(SS 158 to Lakeway Drive)
Project No. 5QX TIP No. QQ
March 2015
Unchanged
Project Description Design and construct a portion of an IH‐35 NB Frontage Road from Williams Drive to
Northwest Boulevard Bridge of a proposed NB FR which would ultimately extend to
Lakeway Drive.
Purpose To relieve congestion in the Williams Drive/Austin Avenue intersection by providing a NB
alternate, interim route to FM 971 and Georgetown High School. This project is the only
remaining portion of IH 35 in Central Texas without a frontage road existing, under
construction or being designed.
Project Manager Bill Dryden
Engineer Klotz Associates
Element Status / Issues
Design Staff and Engineer has met with TxDOT personnel at both the local Area Office and
District Environmental Division.
Environmental/
Archeology
TBD
Rights of Way None identified
Utility Relocations TBD
Construction TBD
Other Issues Staff is working with TxDOT to develop the AFAs required to complete the project.
Northwest Boulevard Overpass
(Fontana Drive to Austin Avenue)
Project No. 5QX TIP No. QQ
March 2015
Unchanged
Project Description Construction of overpass and surface roads to connect Northwest Boulevard with
Austin Avenue and FM 971.
Purpose This project will relieve congestion at the Austin Avenue/Williams Drive
intersection and provide a more direct access from the west side of IH 35 corridor to
Georgetown High School and SH 130 via FM 971.
Project Manager Bill Dryden, P.E.
Engineer Klotz Associates
Element Status / Issues
Design Engineer has presented the Preliminary Engineering Report and has begun final
PS&E design efforts.
Environmental/
Archeological
Concurrent with preliminary engineering and schematic design.
Rights of Way Engineer is developing ROW strip map and individual parcel plats and documents.
Utility Relocations TBD
Construction TBD
Other Issues Staff met with TxDOT to develop an AFA for TxDOT review of the bridge crossing
of I 35 and its frontage roads.
Rivery Boulevard Extension
(Williams Drive to Northwest Boulevard @ Fontana Drive)
Project No. 5RM TIP No. None
March 2015
Project Description Develop the Rights‐of‐Way Map, acquire ROW, address potential environmental
issues and complete construction plans specifications and estimate (PS&E) for the
extension of Rivery Boulevard from Williams Drive to Northwest Boulevard at
Fontana Drive in anticipation of future funding availability.
Purpose To provide a route between Williams Drive and Northwest Boulevard serving the
Gateway area, providing an alternate route from Williams Drive to the future
Northwest Boulevard Bridge over IH 35, to provide a route between the hotels in
the Gateway area and the proposed Conference Center near Rivery Boulevard and
Wolf Ranch Parkway.
Project Manager Bill Dryden, P.E.
Engineer Kasberg Patrick and Associates
Element Status / Issues
Design Surveying and preliminary design underway.
Environmental/
Archeology
TBD
Rights of Way Survey has begun; Engineer expects to have documents available to begin
appraisals this month.
Utility Relocations TBD
Construction TBD
Other Issues TBD
Snead Drive Project
(SE Inner Loop to Airborn Circle)
Project No. 5QZ TIP No. None
March 2015
Project Description Develop Construction Plans Specifications and Estimate (PS&E) for the widening
of Snead Drive from S.E. Inner Loop to 600 feet north of Cooperative Way,
including appurtenant waste water improvements.
Purpose This project has been identified as GTEC eligible project and will provide
necessary infrastructure for ongoing economic development in the area.
Project Manager Bill Dryden, P.E.
Engineer Steger Bizzell
Element Status / Issues
Design Complete
Environmental/
Archeological
Included with PS&E.
Rights of Way Agreement has been reached for the property need to install a water quality
pond; paperwork pending.
Utility Relocations Utility relocations either complete or are part of the construction contract.
Construction TBD – Upon acquisition of property for water quality pond.
Other Issues It was anticipated that the property for construct water quality pond would be
donated, but owner has some issues with the mortgage holder concerning
donation. Property owner is seeking compensation.
Southwest Bypass Project
(SH 29 to RM 2243)
Project No. 5QC TIP No. 14b
March 2015
Project Description Develop a Design Schematic for the Southwest Bypass from Leander Road (RM
2243) to SH 29 and Construction Plans Specifications and Estimate (PS&E) for the
construction of approximately 1.3 miles of 2‐lane interim roadway with bridges
from Leander Road to its intersection with Wolf Ranch Parkway Extension (TIP
Project No. 14A.
Purpose This project is identified as needed in the OTP and GTEC TIP. This project, in
coordination with Wolf Ranch Parkway Extension, will provide access from
Leander Road to DB Wood Road south of SH 29, allowing alternate access from
southwest to west areas of the City, relieving the increasing traffic demand along
the IH 35 corridor.
Project Manager Bill Dryden, P.E.
Engineer HDR Engineering, Inc.
Element Status / Issues
Design Engineer has completed the project PS&E, less construction contract documents
and environmental permitting required at time of actual construction.
Environmental/
Archeological
Draft Report detailing the environmental, geotechnical and historical issues has
been completed and submitted to the Williamson County Conservation
Foundation for determination of issues to be mitigated.
Rights of Way Weir Trust property ‐ Condemnation pending.
Guy/Knight property – Acquisition complete.
Wolf property – Acquisition complete.
Utility Relocations None identified at this time.
Construction TBD
Other Issues Several re‐design items pending due to ROW negotiations and changes to
adjacent development; final task order amendment will be brought forth to
finish the work required for this project at the 90% level.
Wolf Ranch Parkway Extension Project
(SW Bypass to DB Wood Road)
Project No. 5QV TIP No. 14a
March 2015
Project Description Design Schematic and Plans Specifications & Estimate for the construction of a
roadway from Southwest Bypass (TIP Project # 14B) to DB Wood Road south of
SH 29. The project is planned as a major arterial.
Purpose This project is identified as needed in the OTP and the TIP. This project, in
coordination with Southwest Bypass (#14B), will provide access from Leander
Road to DB Wood Road south of SH 29, allowing alternate access from southwest
to west areas of the City, relieving the increasing traffic demand along the IH‐35
corridor.
Project Manager Bill Dryden, P.E.
Engineer HDR, Engineering, Inc.
Element Status / Issues
Design Design 90% complete; final 10% (construction contract documents and WCCF
environmental permitting fees required at time of actual construction.)
Environmental/
Archeological
Final report concerning the environmental, geotechnical and historical issues has
been submitted for review.
Rights of Way Complete.
Utility Relocations None identified at this time.
Construction Pending 2015 bond funding
Other Issues Fencing has been deleted from project. Staff is completing a task order
amendment to pay for that work performed by Engineer prior to it being
deleted from project.
Current Capital Improvement Projects TIP
No.
Project
No.
Update On Schedule/
Or Behind
Project
Budget
Project
Cost
Available Current Year
Projected
Current Year
Cost
Current Year
Available
Lakeway Drive Overpass #10 5QL Project Complete.
Complete 2,500,000 2,500,000 0 0 0
Wolf Ranch Parkway Extension (SW Bypass to DB
Wood Road)
#14A 5QW Design – 90% complete; final 10%
(construction contract documents and WCCF
environmental permitting fees required at time
of actual construction.)
Construction – Pending 2105 Bond funding
Other Issues – Fencing has been deleted from
project. Staff is completing a task order
amendment to pay for that work performed by
Engineer prior to it being deleted from project.
ROW has been acquired.
On Schedule
Unchanged
1,330,000 1,111,233 218,767 283,350 0 283,350
Southwest Bypass (SH29 to RR2243)#14B 5QC Engineer has completed the project PS&E, less
construction contract documents and
environmental permitting required at time of actual
construction.
Weir Trust property - Condemnation pending.
Guy/Knight property – Acquisition complete.
Wolf property – Acquisition complete.
Other Issues – Several re-design items pending
due to ROW negotiations and changes to
adjacent development; final task order
amendment will be brought forth to finish the
On Schedule
Unchanged
7,756,432 3,225,132 4,531,300 4,539,107 5,787 4,533,320
Northwest Blvd Overpass #QQ 5QX Engineer has presented the Preliminary
Engineering Report and has begun final PS&E
design efforts.
Engineer is developing ROW strip map and
In-process
Unchanged
1,136,178 1,099,076 37,102 571,178 479,588 91,590
NB Frontage Road (SS 158 to Lakeway)#QQ 5QY Staff and Engineer has met with TxDOT personnel
at both the local Area Office and District
Environmental Division.
In-process
Unchanged
613,822 613,822 0 382,822 382,822 0
ROW - 1460 #EEa
#EEb
#EEc
5RB Construction scheduled to begin in Spring
2015.
Utility relocations - ongoing.
As of October 16th, the City has obtained
Possession and Use Agreements or have closings
completed or planned for all the remaining FM
1460 parcels.
On Schedule 11,788,230 5,348,470 6,439,760 6,727,539 2,315,896 4,411,643
Rivery Boulevard 5RM Survey has begun; Engineer expects to have
documents available to begin appraisals this
month.
On Schedule
Snead Drive 5QZ PS&E is complete;
Agreement has been reached for the property
need to install a water quality pond; paperwork
pending.
On Schedule
Unchanged
825,100 87,000 738,100 825,100 87,000 738,100
Mays Street Extension 5RI Engineering has submitted the proposed
alignment and is working on the 30%PS&E.
On Schedule
Unchanged
196,000 196,000 0 196,000 196,000 0
IH 35/ Hwy 29 Intersection 5RJ TBD 650,000 0 650,000 650,000 0 650,000
Current Economic Development Projects Project
Type
Update On Schedule/
Or Behind
Project
Budget
Project
Cost
Available Current Year
Budget
Current Year
Cost
Current Year
Available
Economic Development Projects 1,137,500 1,137,500 1,137,500 0 1,137,500
16,062,596 3,467,093 12,595,503
Project to Date Current Year Budget (13/14)
GTEC PROJECT UPDATE AND STATUS REPORT
March 2015
Project to Date Current Year Budget (13/14)
L:\Global\CIP Agenda Form\GTEC Status Report\2015\GTEC - Project Status - 2015-03.xlsx Page 1 of 1 3/12/2015
Austin Avenue – Bridge Evaluations
(North and South San Gabriel Rivers)
Project No. TBD TIP Project No. N/A
March 2015
Unchanged
Project Description Evaluate the repairs necessary to restore full structural capacity to the Austin Avenue
bridges over the North and South San Gabriel Rivers. The process will involve several
phases – I) determination of testing needed, II) structural testing, analyses and
evaluation of test data to determine/recommend corrective measures and a project
budget, III) develop construction plans, specifications and contract documents,
estimates of probable construction costs and, last, IV) construction administration.
Purpose To extend the structural life of the two bridge and provide long‐term vehicular
capacity and pedestrian safety along Austin Avenue.
Project Manager Bill Dryden, P.E.
Engineer Aguirre & Fields, LP
Element Status / Issues
Design Staff met with Engineer and discussed potential courses of action. There are four basic
paths to consider: Do Nothing. Short Term Temporary Fix. Medium Term Fix. Replace
Structure.
Engineer has developed 2 potential conceptual alignments for the proposed
reconstruction of the bridge.
Surveying TBD
Environmental TBD during Phase II
Rights of Way Prop. ROW from 3rd Street to N. of 2nd; Exist. ROW from N. of 2nd to Morrow Street.
Utility Reloc’ns TBD (future)
Construction TBD
Other Issues Project submitted for CAMPO funding;
Project eligible for TxDOT Off‐System Bridge Replacement Program.
FM 971 at Austin Avenue
Realignment Intersection Improvements
Project No. 1BZ TIP No. QQ1
March 2015
Unchanged
Project Description Design and preparation of final plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E) for the widening
and realignment of FM 971 at Austin Avenue, eastward to Gann Street.
Purpose To provide a new alignment consistent with the alignment of the proposed Northwest
Boulevard Bridge over IH 35; to allow a feasible, alternate route from the west side of I 35 to
Austin Avenue, to Georgetown High School, to San Gabriel Park and a more direct route to
SH 130.
Project Managers Bill Dryden, P.E.
Engineer Klotz Associates, Inc.
Element Status / Issues
Design Preliminary Engineering complete;
Engineer working on 60% design submittal
Environmental/
Archeological
10/2015
Rights of Way Complete
Utility Relocations TBD
Construction 10/2016
Other Issues Working with TxDOT to develop an Advance Funding Agreement for plans review
and construction administration.
FM 1460
Quail Valley Drive to University Drive
Project No. 5RB TIP No. EEa, EEb & EEc
March 2015
Project Description Design and preparation of plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E) for the widening and
reconstruction of FM 1460. Project will include review and update to existing Schematic,
Right‐of‐Way Map and Environmental Document and completion of the PS&E for the
remaining existing roadway.
Purpose To keep the currently approved environmental documents active; purchase ROW, effect
utility relocations/clearance and to provide on‐the‐shelf PS&E for TxDOT letting not later
than August 2013, pending available construction funding.
Project Managers Ed Polasek, AICP and Bill Dryden, P.E.
Engineer Brown and Gay Engineers, Inc.
Element Status / Issues
Design Complete
Environmental/
Archeological
Complete
Rights of Way As of October 16th, the City has obtained Possession and
Use Agreements or have closings planned for all the
remaining FM 1460 parcels.
Acquired: 34
Pending: 0
Condemnation: 2
Total: 36
Utility Relocations Ongoing.
Construction Bid opened August 2014
Construction scheduled to commence Spring 2015.
Other Issues None Pending
Overall Transportation Plan Update
March 2015
Project Description The updated OTP is a continuation of the effort that the City completed in 2004
with the adoption of the initial OTP. That document provided an analysis of
existing conditions and travel characteristics, a refined area‐wide travel demand
model, review of the City’s roadway functional classification system and a revised
Thoroughfare Plan.
Project Managers Ed Polasek, AICP, Bill Dryden, P.E., Nat Waggoner, PMP® and Jordan Maddox,
AICP
Engineer Klotz Associates, Inc.
Element Status / Issues
Key
Accomplishments
DRAFT OTP has been:
Presented to GTAB at its January 9th meeting.
Presented at Council Workshop on January 13th.
Presented to P&Z for review and comments January 20th.
Presented to GTAB on February 13th.
Presented to Council on February 24th for First Reading of the Ordinance fro
adoption.
Upcoming Tasks Staff:
• Will present 2nd Reading of Ordinance adopting the OTP March 10th.
Issues Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO) has not yet adopted
the 2040 Regional Transportation Plan nor the 2010 Travel Demand Model
supporting that plan. When adopted in May 2015, the 2040 plan and model will
provide key data which will allow supporting jurisdictions the opportunity to
update their transportation plans. Georgetown transportation planning efforts
will benefit from updated modeling data and should pursue funding to update the
2012 data currently informing the OTP.
Sidewalk Master Plan and Public Facility Access Audit
March 2015
Purpose The purpose of the City of Georgetown Sidewalk Study and Public Facility Access
Audit is to inventory existing public infrastructure within the City of Georgetown City
Limits, identify design and compliance deficiencies, evaluate future program
requirements, and develop a long term implementation plan.
Project
Manager
Nat Waggoner, PMP®
Engineer HDR, Inc.
Task Status / Issues
Initiation - Completed
Planning - Completed
Execution - See below
Task Name Start End
ADA Reporting Criteria for Sidewalk Analysis May-14 Jun-14
Comprehensive Review of Existing Studies, Plans, and
Reports
May-14 Jun-14
Self-Assessment Survey of Downtown District May-14 Jul-14
Data Collection and Field Inventory Jun-14 Aug-14
City Facilities Survey Jul-14 Sep-14
Sidewalk Implementation Plan and Project Prioritization May-14 Oct-14
Parks and Amenities Survey Nov-14 Feb-14
Government and Public Stakeholder Meetings May-14 Jan-15
Public Meetings and Hearings Periodic
thru
Mar-15
ADA Transition Plan Update to Council Targeting Apr-15 Ongoing
Project Close Out Activities Targeting Mar-15 Ongoing
10 Yr. Recommended Implementation Strategy Funding Needed
Priority 1 Projects $10.2 M
Operations and Maintenance $5 M
Replacement and Retirement (Recommended in 2025) $8 M
ADA Outstanding Tasks
MAR –Staff input complete
APR –Boards, Commissions and Council review
MAY –Adoption
Issues
Implementation of Priority 1 projects and budget requests for operations and maintenance will
involve boards and commissions, including GTAB.
Guidance Needed
At the 1st Reading on February 24th, Councilmember Hesser asked staff to further investigate
ownership and maintenance policies for sidewalks. Staff is coordinating with the Planning
Department for possible inclusion in the UDC amendment process and is looking for guidance from
GTAB as to inclusion in as a regular agenda item.
Southwest Bypass Project
(RM 2243 to IH 35)
Project No. 1CA Project No. 14c
March 2015
Unchanged
Project Description Develop a Design Schematic for the Southwest Bypass from Leander Road (RM 2243) to IH
35 in the ultimate configuration and Construction Plans, Specifications and Estimate (PS&E)
for construction of approximately 1.5 miles of interim 2‐lane roadway from Leander Road
(RM 2243) to its intersection with the existing Inner Loop underpass at IH 35. The portion
from Leander Road to the east property line of Texas Crushed Stone is a GTAB Project; from
the east line to the existing Inner Loop underpass at IH 35 is being funded by GTEC.
Purpose To extend an interim portion of the SH 29 Bypass, filling in between Leander Road (RM
2243) to IH 35 Southbound Frontage Road.
Project Manager Williamson County
City Contact: Ed Polasek, AICP and Bill Dryden, P.E.
Engineer HDR, Inc.
Element Status / Issues
Design Engineer is in preliminary engineering and schematic design phase of the facility.
Alignment has been presented to staff and management.
Surveying City stall met with the Surveyor to resolve a conflict in the proposed ROW to be
acquired from Texas Crushed Stone.
Environmental/
Archeological
TBD by preliminary engineering phase.
Rights of Way Conceptually established by the Industrial Agreement; will be refined through the
schematic design phase.
Negotiations ongoing for the remainder of the ROW
Utility Relocations TBD (future)
Construction This project included in the Williamson County 2013 Bond Program to construct 2
lanes of the ultimate roadway.
Other Issues None
Transit Study
as Requested by City Council
Project No. None Project No. None
March 2015
Unchanged
Project
Description
Council Motion: Discussion and possible direction to the City of Georgetown's Transportation
Advisory Board (GTAB) to conduct an analysis and make a recommendation to the City Council
no later than June 24, 2014 ,regarding the City's potential future participation in State and
Regional Transportation Organizations including the benefits, conditions, and justification which
would prompt the City's participation in Project Connect, Lone Star Rail and any other relevant
State and Regional Transportation Organizations that the City should be involved with -- Steve
Fought, Councilmember, District 4
Amended Motion:
1. The City Manager to determine what time and effort staff have available to conduct this type
of study over the next year. If it is not in the Transportation Division, Planning Department,
Finance Department and/or City Manager’s Office work program, as outlined in the current
draft budget, can it be adequately staffed to complete this level of work over the next year?
2. Is the challenge to research Federal, State and Regional transportation organizations or is it
transit programs? This direction to staff is assuming it is transit programs.
3. Narrow the specific analysis to programs that are actually authorized to receive Federal
formula and discretionary funding programs found within the current Federal Transit
Administration. However, that would narrow the field down to three agencies or programs.
Capital Metro, Lone Star Rail and the State of Texas through the Texas Department of
Transportation. CARTS is only a contractor to Capital Metro and provides certain 5310
transit opportunities to persons outside of the Capital Metro Service Area in our jurisdiction.
CAMPO, Project Connect, Project Connect North and My35 are simply planning programs
that include staff from Capital Metro, Lone Star Rail District, and TxDOT and
representatives from local governments.
4. The analysis should be based on how those planning programs will lead to funding through
the project delivery agencies. (Fought amended to include financial risk and benefits to the City)
5. The Council should provide the Board and staff specifics on what type of economic analysis
data will lead to an ultimate decision by the City Council.
6. Finally, some people ‘can’t see what the final project would look like’ or ‘can’t see what a
Transit Oriented Development would look like.’ Years ago, when the City was looking at
transportation options and creating a TOD ordinance, there was a field trip to perform some
on the ground research. Members of the City Council, Planning and Zoning, and staff
(GTAB was not in existence at the time) went and stayed at a TOD to see for themselves.
We should have at least one field trip during this study. Since it has been about 8 years or
so since that first and only field trip, it should be extremely informative to do it again and
see what a TOD looks like today and how the project has performed over the years.
Vote on the original motion as amended: Approved (6-1) (Hesser opposed)
Project
Manager
Ed Polasek, AICP
Engineer TBD
Project Status Workplan Under Development
Transportation Services Operations
CIP Maintenance
March 2015
Project Description 2014‐2015 CIP Maintenance of roadways including, Chip seal, Cutler Overlays,
Fog seal applications and Engineering design of future rehabilitation projects.
Purpose To provide protection and maintain an overall pavement condition index of
85%.
Project Manager Mark Miller
Engineer/Engineers KPA, Steger Bizzell, Halff Assoc.
Task Status / Issues
2nd and 6th Street
Engineering
(KPA) 2nd St. to College St. plans are complete. Advertising, bidding and
construction will coincide with Parks and Recreation VFW Field
reconstruction project in approximately June / July minimizing disruption to
baseball season and to residents.
9th Street
(Main to Rock)
(KPA) (Patin Construction) Austin to Rock portion 98% completed. Electric
conduit is in place. Patin is scheduled to return on March 25th and still plans
to complete project on schedule. (Before the end of April / Poppy Festival)
Chip Seal 2015 proposed to be bid April 1st and brought to April 10th GTAB with
construction complete by August 30th.
Fog Seal 2015 Fog sealing will be completed in‐house. In‐house engineering is being
provided for specified streets. Engineering under way and fog sealing will be
completed prior to mid‐June or as temperature allow. Temperatures much
above 80 degrees slows dry time.
Cutler/overlay 2015 proposed Cutler Overlays Proposed to be bid on April 1st and brought to
April 10th GTAB with construction complete by October 1st.
Pavement
Evaluation
KPA Engineering: pavement evaluation/scoring and update of 5 year
(Complete)
City of Georgetown, Texas
Transportation Enhancement Corp
March 18, 2015
SUBJECT:
Presentation of Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation monthly financial report for
February 2015. Micki Rundell, Chief Financial Officer, COG, Finance Manager GTEC.
ITEM SUMMARY:
The Bylaws of GTEC (Article V, Section 6.02) require the Finance Manager to report the financial
activity of the Corporation to the Board.
Financial reports
Sales Tax revenues
Any other relevant financial information
Sales tax is received two months in arrears; therefore the revenues reflect only the amount
received, not actually earned, as of the report date. A report on payments made to vendors for the
month of February is also included.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
n/a
SUBMITTED BY:
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Monthly Financial Backup Material
Prepared by: LKemp
3/11/2015
Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation
As of February 28, 2015
Statement of Operations
A B C D E
2014/2015 2/28/2014
Budget $ YTD Actuals $%
Beginning Fund Balance 12,390,398 13,347,960 (957,562) 12,339,757 1,008,203 8%
Operating Revenues:
Sales Tax Revenue 5,491,500 [A]1,396,521 (4,094,979) 1,339,830 56,691 4%
Interest 12,500 16,646 4,146 2,688 13,958 519%
Reimbursement due from TXDOT 1,350,000 [B]441,898 (908,102) 2,069,542 (1,627,644) -79%
PID Assessments (Wolf Ranch Agreement)500,000 [C]- (500,000) - - 0%
Debt Proceeds [D]17,500,000 - (17,500,000) - - 0%
Total Operating Revenues 24,854,000 1,855,064 (22,998,936) 3,412,059 (1,556,995) -46%
Operating Expenses:
Administrative Expense & Supplies (405,101) (109,560) (295,541) (93,121) (16,439) 18%
Total Operating Expenses (405,101) (109,560) (295,541) (93,121) (16,439) 18%
Total - Net Operating Revenues (Expenses)24,448,899 1,745,504 (23,294,477) 3,318,938 (1,573,434) -47%
Non-Operating Revenues (Expenses):
Debt Service (2,600,131) (959,459) (1,640,672) (1,009,261) 49,802 -5%
ROW-1460 (1,500,000) [B](519,037) (980,963)
FM 1460 Widening (450,000) - (450,000)
SH 29 to RM2243 (SW Bypass)(3,704,107) (1,262,111) (2,441,996)
SW Bypass - 2243 to IH35 (1,500,000) - (1,500,000)
Arterial SE 1: Inner Loop - (27,825) 27,825
Fontana Drive to Austin Avenue (91,590) - (91,590)
Wolf Ranch Pkwy Extension (283,350) - (283,350)
Snead Drive (739,000) (19,329) (719,671)
Rivery Road (Convention Center Prj.)(721,000) - (721,000)
IH35/Hwy29 Intersection Improvements (650,000) - (650,000)
Rivery Extension (Williamson Dr. to NW Blvd)(1,500,000) (706,110) (793,890)
Pecan Center Drive [D](6,850,000) - (6,850,000)
Mays Street (Rabbit Hill Road)(S. Georgetown TIRZ)[D](10,650,000) - (10,650,000)
Transportation Improvement Program (28,639,047) (2,534,412) (8,604,635)
To Be Determined (1,372,875) - (1,372,875)
Economic Development Projects (1,372,875) - (1,372,875)
Total Non-Operating Revenues (Expenses)(3,493,871) (11,618,182)
Ending Fund Balance 4,227,244
Reservations
Contingency = 90 days sales tax receipts 1,501,000
TXDOT Refund for Williams Dr. payment 915,891
Total Reserved Fund Balance 2,416,891
Unreserved Fund Balance 1,810,353
NOTES:
[A]Sales tax posts two months after collections.
[B]TXDOT reimburses 90% of allowable charges on FM 1460.
[C]Assessment revenues are transferred at fiscal year end.
[D]Budget amendment approved by City Council January 2015. Bonds to be issued at a later date (2016) and project construction will be in 2016-17.
(32,612,053)
2/28/2015
YTD Actuals
Variance
Year to Date
Variance
Budget
Prepared by: LKemp
3/11/2015
Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation
As of February 28, 2015
Balance Sheet Highlights
Balance Sheet Highlights:
Current Assets (cash)
Cash - general/debt service 1,674,260
Investments - Certificates of Deposits & Money Market Accounts 10,031,691
TXDOT Receivables 1,164,223
Current Assets and CASH ON HAND Total:12,870,174
TXDOT Receivables Aging [A]
Not Requested 406,614
0 - 60 days -
61- 120 days -
121 or more days 757,609
Total TXDOT Receivables 1,164,223
Bond Debt Outstanding
2007 Sales Tax Bonds 8,470,000 (Proceeds funded SE1)
ACTUAL FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR PROJECTS
Budgeted Ending Fund Balance 4,227,244
Less:
Reserved - TXDOT Refund for Williams Dr. payment [B](915,891)
Reserved - Contingency = 90 days of sales tax receipts (1,501,000)
Unreserved Fund Balance 1,810,353
Add:
Economic Development Projects to be determined 1,372,875 Appropriated per policy
Preliminary Projected Excess Beginning Fund Balance [C]957,562
TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDS FOR NEW OR FUTURE PROJECTS 4,140,790
NOTES:
[A]TXDOT reimbursement payments are behind due to staffing shortages at TXDOT. Reimbursement requests
have been appropriately submitted and full payment is expected.
[B]To fund settlement with Williamson Co.
[C]Represents excess revenues earned and projects not expended.
Prepared by: LKemp
3/11/2015 L:\Division\finance\Share2\AGENDA\GTEC\2015\Finreports\201502-February
Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation
February 28, 2015
Variance % Var.
MONTH [a]2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 To FY 14 To FY 14
October 264,484 281,056 345,296 367,451 392,374 24,923 6.78%
November 309,844 297,888 328,333 398,208 411,566 13,358 3.35%
December 467,122 447,872 470,330 538,728 575,095 36,367 6.75%
January 271,870 292,708 330,857 357,430 350,778 (6,652)-1.86%
February 231,618 291,782 311,562 347,604
March 432,060 423,287 462,254 457,421
April 288,399 325,447 337,678 424,007
May 293,230 323,676 377,648 450,289
June 404,048 398,654 456,529 493,224
July 279,124 359,877 371,061 409,739
August 300,806 343,168 370,942 392,059
September 359,326 353,337 500,787 477,892
Total $3,901,931 $4,138,751 $4,663,277 $5,114,052 $1,729,813 $67,996
YTD 1,313,320 1,319,524 1,474,816 1,661,817 1,729,813 67,996 4.09%[b]
Notes:
[a] Sales tax revenue from the State Comptroller is received two months in arrears.
[b] YTD compared thru current month.
$0
$100,000
$200,000
$300,000
$400,000
$500,000
$600,000
$700,000
Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
Sales Tax 3 Year Trend
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
Check Report Summary
For the Month Ending
February 28, 2015
Gardere, Wynne, Sewell LP $20,644.42
Legal services related to FM 1460 $5,805.58
Legal services related to SW Bypass 3,312.02
Legal services related to SE1 11,526.82
Georgetown Title Company 632,565.22
Purchase of ROW for the SW Bypass project 632,565.22
Longhorn Title Company 3,441.86
Title on parcel 211 - FM 1460 1,964.93
Title on parcel 212 - FM 1460 1,476.93
Longhorn Junction Land 309.28
ROW FM 1460 conveyance of .002 arces 309.28
Chiang, Patel, & Yerby, Inc 13,904.90
Engineering work on Mays St (Rabbit Hill)13,904.90
Carson & Associates Inc.4,937.50
Updating land planning report - Weir Ranch 4,937.50
Lone Star Appraisals 4,500.00
Appraisal of property on FM 2243 4,500.00
Kasberg, Patrick & Associates. LP 19,330.80
Engineering work on Rivery Blvd. extension 19,330.80
$699,633.98 $699,633.98
3/03/2015 4:17 PM A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT PAGE: 4
VENDOR SET: 02 CITY OF GEORGETOWN
BANK: JPM JP MORGAN CHASE
DATE RANGE: 2/01/2015 THRU 2/28/2015
CHECK CHECK CHECK CHECK
VENDOR I.D. NAME STATUS DATE AMOUNT DISCOUNT NO STATUS AMOUNT
011360 LONGHORN JUNCTION LAND
I-ROW FM 1460/091114 LONGHORN JUNCTION LAND V 9/11/2014 206202 309.28
011360 LONGHORN JUNCTION LAND
M-CHECK LONGHORN JUNCTION LAND UNPOST V 2/09/2015 206202 309.28CR
011440 CARSON & ASSOCIATES INC
I-CR012815.CARSON CARSON & ASSOCIATES INC R 2/05/2015 209982
400 9-0980-90-022 SH 29 TO RM2243 SW BYPASS CARSON & ASSOCIATES 4,937.50 4,937.50
011240 GARDERE WYNNE SEWELL LP
I-1172453 DEC 2014 INVOICES R 2/05/2015 209983
400 9-0980-90-022 SH 29 TO RM2243 SW BYPASS DEC 2014 INVOICES 295.00
I-1172454 DEC 2014 INVOICES R 2/05/2015 209983
400 9-0980-90-014 ROW - 1460 DEC 2014 INVOICES 177.00
I-1172455 DEC 2014 INVOICES R 2/05/2015 209983
400 9-0980-90-014 ROW - 1460 DEC 2014 INVOICES 389.78
I-1172456 DEC 2014 INVOICES R 2/05/2015 209983
400 9-0980-90-014 ROW - 1460 DEC 2014 INVOICES 767.00
I-1172457 DEC 2014 INVOICES R 2/05/2015 209983
400 9-0980-90-014 ROW - 1460 DEC 2014 INVOICES 163.00
I-1172458 DEC 2014 INVOICES R 2/05/2015 209983
400 9-0980-90-014 ROW - 1460 DEC 2014 INVOICES 295.00
400 9-0980-90-014 ROW - 1460 DEC 2014 INVOICES 664.50
I-1172459 DEC 2014 INVOICES R 2/05/2015 209983
400 9-0980-90-014 ROW - 1460 DEC 2014 INVOICES 98.02
I-1172460 DEC 2014 INVOICES R 2/05/2015 209983
400 9-0980-90-022 SH 29 TO RM2243 SW BYPASS DEC 2014 INVOICES 674.67
I-1172461 DEC 2014 INVOICES R 2/05/2015 209983
400 9-0980-90-025 ARTERIAL SE1:INNER LOOP/SH130 DEC 2014 INVOICES 9,595.14
I-1172462 DEC 2014 INVOICES R 2/05/2015 209983
400 9-0980-90-022 SH 29 TO RM2243 SW BYPASS DEC 2014 INVOICES 236.00
I-1172463 DEC 2014 INVOICES R 2/05/2015 209983
400 9-0980-90-022 SH 29 TO RM2243 SW BYPASS DEC 2014 INVOICES 118.00 13,473.11
10140 GEORGETOWN TITLE COMPANY
I-CR012715.GTC GEORGETOWN TITLE COMPANY R 2/05/2015 209984
400 9-0980-90-022 SH 29 TO RM2243 SW BYPASS GEORGETOWN TITLE COM 632,565.22 632,565.22
15381 LONGHORN TITLE CO
I-CR012715.LONGHORN LONGHORN TITLE CO R 2/05/2015 209985
400 9-0980-90-014 ROW - 1460 LONGHORN TITLE CO 1,964.93 1,964.93
3/03/2015 4:17 PM A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT PAGE: 5
VENDOR SET: 02 CITY OF GEORGETOWN
BANK: JPM JP MORGAN CHASE
DATE RANGE: 2/01/2015 THRU 2/28/2015
CHECK CHECK CHECK CHECK
VENDOR I.D. NAME STATUS DATE AMOUNT DISCOUNT NO STATUS AMOUNT
011360 LONGHORN JUNCTION LAND
I-ROW FM 1460/091114 LONGHORN JUNCTION LAND R 2/12/2015 Reissue 210164
400 9-0980-90-014 ROW - 1460 LONGHORN JUNCTION LA 309.28 309.28
10050 CHIANG, PATEL,& YERBY,INC
I-GEOR14019.01-6 T. O. CPY 14-001 R 2/19/2015 210360
400 9-0980-90-060 MAYS STREET T. O. CPY 14-001 13,904.90 13,904.90
011240 GARDERE WYNNE SEWELL LP
I-1176665 JANUARY INVOICES R 2/19/2015 210361
400 9-0980-90-022 SH 29 TO RM2243 SW BYPASS JANUARY INVOICES 413.00
I-1176666 JANUARY INVOICES R 2/19/2015 210361
400 9-0980-90-014 ROW - 1460 JANUARY INVOICES 118.00
I-1176667 JANUARY INVOICES R 2/19/2015 210361
400 9-0980-90-014 ROW - 1460 JANUARY INVOICES 88.50
I-1176668 JANUARY INVOICES R 2/19/2015 210361
400 9-0980-90-014 ROW - 1460 JANUARY INVOICES 177.00
I-1176669 JANUARY INVOICES R 2/19/2015 210361
400 9-0980-90-014 ROW - 1460 JANUARY INVOICES 324.50
I-1176670 JANUARY INVOICES R 2/19/2015 210361
400 9-0980-90-014 ROW - 1460 JANUARY INVOICES 501.50
I-1176671 JANUARY INVOICES R 2/19/2015 210361
400 9-0980-90-014 ROW - 1460 JANUARY INVOICES 711.14
I-1176672 JANUARY INVOICES R 2/19/2015 210361
400 9-0980-90-014 ROW - 1460 JANUARY INVOICES 1,330.64
I-1176673 JANUARY INVOICES R 2/19/2015 210361
400 9-0980-90-022 SH 29 TO RM2243 SW BYPASS JANUARY INVOICES 800.13
I-1176674 JANUARY INVOICES R 2/19/2015 210361
400 9-0980-90-025 ARTERIAL SE1:INNER LOOP/SH130 JANUARY INVOICES 1,931.68
I-1176675 JANUARY INVOICES R 2/19/2015 210361
400 9-0980-90-022 SH 29 TO RM2243 SW BYPASS JANUARY INVOICES 450.72
I-1176676 JANUARY INVOICES R 2/19/2015 210361
400 9-0980-90-022 SH 29 TO RM2243 SW BYPASS JANUARY INVOICES 324.50 7,171.31
011450 LONE STAR APPRAISALS
I-CR021915 LONE STAR APPRAISALS R 2/26/2015 210493
400 9-0980-90-022 SH 29 TO RM2243 SW BYPASS LONE STAR APPRAISALS 4,500.00 4,500.00
15381 LONGHORN TITLE CO
I-CR021315 LONGHORN TITLE CO R 2/26/2015 210494
400 9-0980-90-014 ROW - 1460 LONGHORN TITLE CO 1,476.93 1,476.93
10090 KASBERG, PATRICK &
I-14-130-004 KPA 15-001 E 2/23/2015 999999
400 9-0980-90-053 WILLIAMS DRIVE GATEWAY KPA 15-001 19,330.80 19,330.80
3/03/2015 4:17 PM A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT PAGE: 6
VENDOR SET: 02 CITY OF GEORGETOWN
BANK: JPM JP MORGAN CHASE
DATE RANGE: 2/01/2015 THRU 2/28/2015
CHECK CHECK CHECK CHECK
VENDOR I.D. NAME STATUS DATE AMOUNT DISCOUNT NO STATUS AMOUNT
* * T O T A L S * * NO INVOICE AMOUNT DISCOUNTS CHECK AMOUNT
REGULAR CHECKS: 9 679,993.90 0.00 680,303.18
HAND CHECKS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
DRAFTS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
EFT: 1 19,330.80 0.00 19,330.80
NON CHECKS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
VOID CHECKS: 1 VOID DEBITS 309.28
VOID CREDITS 309.28CR 0.00 0.00
TOTAL ERRORS: 0
** G/L ACCOUNT TOTALS **
G/L ACCOUNT NAME AMOUNT
----------------------------------------------------------------------
400 9-0980-90-014 ROW - 1460 9,556.72
400 9-0980-90-022 SH 29 TO RM2243 SW BYPASS 645,314.74
400 9-0980-90-025 ARTERIAL SE1:INNER LOOP/SH130 11,526.82
400 9-0980-90-053 WILLIAMS DRIVE GATEWAY 19,330.80
400 9-0980-90-060 MAYS STREET 13,904.90
*** FUND TOTAL *** 699,633.98
NO INVOICE AMOUNT DISCOUNTS CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR SET: 02 BANK: JPM TOTALS: 11 699,633.98 0.00 699,633.98
BANK: JPM TOTALS: 22 699,633.98 0.00 699,633.98
REPORT TOTALS: 37 693,109.98 0.00 699,633.98
City of Georgetown, Texas
Transportation Enhancement Corp
March 18, 2015
SUBJECT:
Consideration and possible action to appoint Board President consistent with Section 3.02 of the
GTEC Bylaws. – Jim Briggs, General Manager, GTEC Board
ITEM SUMMARY:
Per the Bylaws of the Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation Board – “Section
3.02 – Officers. The officers of the corporation shall be a president, vice president and secretary.
The board, at each annual meeting, shall elect these officers. The board may appoint such other
officers as it deems necessary, who shall have the authority, and shall perform such duties as from
time to time may be prescribed by the board.”
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
n/a
SUBMITTED BY:
Jana Kern
City of Georgetown, Texas
Transportation Enhancement Corp
March 18, 2015
SUBJECT:
Consideration and possible action to appoint Board Vice - President consistent with Section 3.02
of the GTEC Bylaws. – Jim Briggs, General Manager, GTEC Board
ITEM SUMMARY:
Per the Bylaws of the Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation Board – “Section
3.02 – Officers. The officers of the corporation shall be a president, vice president and secretary.
The board, at each annual meeting, shall elect these officers. The board may appoint such other
officers as it deems necessary, who shall have the authority, and shall perform such duties as from
time to time may be prescribed by the board.”
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
n/a
SUBMITTED BY:
Jana Kern
City of Georgetown, Texas
Transportation Enhancement Corp
March 18, 2015
SUBJECT:
Consideration and possible action to appoint Board Secretary consistent with Section 3.02 of the
GTEC Bylaws. – Jim Briggs, General Manager, GTEC Board
ITEM SUMMARY:
Per the Bylaws of the Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation Board – “Section
3.02 – Officers. The officers of the corporation shall be a president, vice president and secretary.
The board, at each annual meeting, shall elect these officers. The board may appoint such other
officers as it deems necessary, who shall have the authority, and shall perform such duties as from
time to time may be prescribed by the board.”
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
n/a
SUBMITTED BY:
jana kern
City of Georgetown, Texas
Transportation Enhancement Corp
March 18, 2015
SUBJECT:
Review and possible action related to the Day and Time of GTEC Board Meetings. – Jim Briggs,
General Manager, GTEC Board
ITEM SUMMARY:
Per the GTEC Bylaws Section 2.03 Regular Meeting: Place of Meeting – The board shall meet
on a regular basis at a specified time, day, and location as approved annually by the board. All
meetings shall be called and held in accordance with the Texas Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551,
Government Code, as amended. The president of the board may cancel the meeting if there is no
business to be conducted.
Currently, the GTEC Board meets on the third Wednesday of each month at 3:30 PM
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
n/a
SUBMITTED BY:
Jana Kern
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Proposed Meeting Dates Backup Material
GEORGETOWN TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT
CORPORATION (GTEC)
Meeting Schedule
March 2015 – February 2016
All Regular Meetings will be held on the third Wednesday of each month at 3:30 p.m.
at the Georgetown Municipal Complex, located at 300-1 Industrial Avenue
Please contact Jana Kern @ 512- 930-8473 if you have questions regarding meeting dates
or times.
March 18, 2015
April 15, 2015
May 20, 2015
June 17, 2015
July 15, 2015
August 19, 2015
September 16, 2015
October 21, 2015
November 18, 2015
December 16, 2015
January 20, 2016
February 17, 2016
City of Georgetown, Texas
Transportation Enhancement Corp
March 18, 2015
SUBJECT:
Consideration and possible action to approve minutes from the regular GTEC Board meeting held
January 21, 2015. Jim Briggs, General Manager - GTEC
ITEM SUMMARY:
Board to review the minutes from the meeting held on January 21, 2015 and revise or approve.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
n/a
SUBMITTED BY:
Jana Kern
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Draft Minutes Backup Material
Minutes of the Meeting of
Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation
and the Governing Body of the
City of Georgetown, Texas
Wednesday, January 21, 2015
The Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation of the City of Georgetown, Texas, met on
Wednesday, January 21, 2015.
Board Members Present:
Bill Connor - President, John Hesser – Vice President, Jerry Hammerlun - Secretary, Tommy
Gonzalez, Leo Wood, Vacant Spot
Board Members Absent: Johnny Anderson
Staff Present: Jim Briggs, Ed Polasek, Susan Morgan, Jana Kern, La’Mar Kemp, Bill Dryden, Nat
Waggoner, Wes Wright, Mike Babin, Bridget Chapman, Mark Miller
Others Present: Ben Lake – Steger Bizzell, Tom Crawford – 2015 Road Bond Committee Chair,
Minutes
Regular Session
(This Regular Session may, at any time, be recessed to convene and Executive Session for any
purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code 551.)
A. Call to Order – Mr. Bill Connor called the regular GTEC meeting to order on Wednesday
January 21, 2015 at 3:30 PM
The Board may, at any time, recess the Regular Session to convene in Executive Session at the
President, A Board Member, The City Manager, Assistant City Manager, General Manager of
Utilities, City Council Member, and/or legal counsel for any purpose authorized by the Open
Meetings Act, Texas Government Code Chapter 551, and are subject to action in the Regular
Session that follows.
B. Introduction of Visitors
C. Industry/CAMPO/TXDOT Updates: TxDOT feels that a decision for the All System Bridge
Program will happen sometime this spring. Once this is done we will know about the Austin
Ave. Bridges and possibly the DB Wood Road Bridge. Gonzalez asked if the Austin Ave.
Bridges could be part of the GTEC TIP. Polasek stated that it would have to go through the
finds process and that we could add it the 2015/16 findings list.
D. Discussion regarding the Project Progress Reports and Time Lines. – Bill Dryden, P.E.,
Transportation Engineer and Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Transportation Services Director
E. Presentation of Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation monthly financial report
for November 2014. – Micki Rundell, Chief Financial Officer, COG, Finance Manager
Legislative Regular Agenda
F. Consideration and possible action to approve minutes from the regular GTEC Board meeting
held November 19, 2014. – Jim Briggs – General Manager, GTEC
Motion by Gonzalez, second by Hammerlun to approve the minutes as presented. Approved
unanimously 5-0 (Anderson absent)
G. Discussion and possible action regarding amending the 2014/15 GTEC Budget for projects with
remaining funding and approval from 2013/14. Micki Rundell, Chief Financial Officer, COG,
Finance Manager, GTEC
Morgan explained that this amendment is to roll over the appropriation from the 2013/2014
budget into the 2014/2015 budget. This is something that is done annually
Motion by Hammerlun, second by Gonzalez to approve the amendment. Approved
unanimously 5-0 (Anderson absent)
Adjournment
Motion by Hesser, second by Wood to adjourn meeting. Meeting adjourned at 4:18 PM
Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 4:18 PM.
Approved: Attest:
_______________________ ________________________
Bill Connor - President Jerry Hammerlun– Secretary
_________________________
Jana R. Kern – Board Liaison
City of Georgetown, Texas
Transportation Enhancement Corp
March 18, 2015
SUBJECT:
Consideration and possible action to approve Task Order BGE-15-001 with Brown and Gay
Engineers, Inc., of Austin, TX, for professional engineering services related design and
preparation of plans, specifications, and estimates for the widening and reconstruction of Airport
Road from Lakeway Drive to Aviation Drive, inclusive of intersection improvements at Lakeway
Drive and I 35 Southbound Frontage Road improvements in the amount of $485,700.00. – Bill
Dryden, P.E., Transportation Engineer, Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Transportation Services
Director and Bridget Chapman, City Attorney.
ITEM SUMMARY:
In September 2014, the City received a request for GTEC funding to support on-site and off-site
transportation related improvements for the proposed Pecan Center Commercial development
project that will be located North of Lakeway Drive between Airport Road and I 35. The proposed
160 acre development will be developed between 2015 and 2019, and will support retail and
employment center type development based on existing zoning of the site. In October 2014, GTEC
found that the development of Pecan Center Commercial project was eligible for GTEC funding.
Pecan Center Commercial Project – Phase 1 (as currently planned)
Affronts IH35 at eastern edge of overall site and includes 250,000 sq. ft. retail development:
o 50,000 sq. ft. home repair “big box” type outlet
o 25,000 sq. ft. “junior” anchor type outlet
o Remaining sq. ft. for support retail and out-parcel services such as restaurant
Financial analysis determines:
o Project is financially viable with revenues that support the proposed incentives and capital
investment in infrastructure necessary to service the project
o GTEC investment funded through revenues generated at the site
Offsite Transportation
o Intersection at Lakeway & Airport Road
* Improvement funded by GTEC
* Developer to provide ROW including for future expansion of Airport Road
o Airport Road Improvements
* Required for future Phase 2
* Actual amount of ROW needed will be determined in the future
o IH35 South Frontage Road
* City agrees to coordinate with TxDOT and Developer to build the excel/deceleration lands on
the frontage road directly in front of Phase 1 once the Phase 1 of the project has been built or is
substantially complete
* Future anticipated GTEC funding (estimated $500,000)
* Developer will provide ROW/easements as needed
Onsite Transportation - All internal roads/driveways within Phase 1 are funded by Developer
No GTEC Performance Agreement with Developer necessary
o Lakeway/Airport Road improvements provide economic benefit to adjacent properties and
improve economic development opportunities within that quadrant – not project specific
o Frontage Road improvements will not be constructed until the project is underway and
substantially completed thus guaranteeing ROI on investment
In order to accelerate the development of this area and to ensure the quality and type of
development the City desires, the City plans to move forward with proactively building the
necessary off-site infrastructure improvements, thus encouraging capital investment and creation
of new jobs. As part of that project, improvements are required for Airport Road from Lakeway
Drive to Aviation Drive, inclusive of intersection improvements at Lakeway Drive and I 35
southbound frontage road improvements.
In its amended budget for FY 2014-2015, GTEC has allocated funding to complete the
construction plans, specifications and estimate (PS&E) for the project. The City has selected the
firm of Brown and Gay Engineers, Inc., (the “Engineer”) for professional engineering services
related design and preparation of plans, specifications and estimates for the project. The Engineer
has proposed to complete the services for this work in an amount not to exceed $485,700.00. Staff
has reviewed the proposal recommends the proposed Task Order BGE-15-001 based upon an
acceptable scope of services for the project.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of Task Order BGE-15-001 with Brown and Gay Engineers, Inc., of
Austin, TX, for professional engineering services related design and preparation of plans,
specifications, and estimates for the widening and reconstruction of Airport Road from Lakeway
Drive to Aviation Drive, inclusive of intersection improvements at Lakeway Drive and I 35
southbound frontage road improvements in the amount of $485,700.00.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Funding for the Project is available in the adopted FY 2014-2015 GTEC budget as amended. The
financial worksheet is attached.
SUBMITTED BY:
Bill Dryden, P.E., Transportation Engineer
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Financial Analysis Worksheet Backup Material
Task Order BGE-15-001 Exhibit
PROJECT
No.DATE:
PROJECT NAME:5RN 2/9/2014
Division/Department:Director Approval
Prepared By:Finance Approval La'Ke2/10/14
TOTAL ANNUAL BUDGET 6,850,000.00
(Current year only)
Actual Cost Agenda Total Spent
Encumbrance Item & Encumbered % Annual
(A) before agenda item (B)(A + B) Budget
Consulting (BGE-15-001)485,700.00 485,700.00 7%
Right of Way 0.00 0%
Construction 0.00 0%
Other Costs 0.00 0%
Total Current Year Costs 0.00 485,700.00 485,700.00
Approved
GENERAL LEDGER ACCOUNT NUMBER CY Budget
400-9-0980-90-063 6,850,000.00
Total Budget 6,850,000.00
TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET 6,850,000.00
(includes all previous yrs.)
Prior Years Current Year Total Project % Total
Spent/Encumbered Costs Costs Budget
Consulting 0.00 485,700.00 485,700.00 7%
Right of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0%
Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0%
Other Costs 0.00 0.00 0.00 0%
Total Project Costs 0.00 485,700.00 485,700.00
later date (2016) and project construction will be in 2016-17.
Bill Dryden, Transportation Engineer
Transportation Services
CDBG - Budgetary and Financial Analysis Worksheet
Comments: Budget amendment approved by City Council January 13, 2015. Bonds to be issued at a
Airport Rd (Pecan Center Commercial)
Pecan Center Commercial
Widening and Intersection Impv'ts
DRAFT
F M 9 7 1
N IH 35 FWY SB
35 FWY NB
A
IR
P
O
R
T
R
D
N IH 35 NB
N AUSTIN AVE
N
E
I
N
N
E
R
L
O
O
P
S T A D I U M D R
GOLD EN OA KS RD
D R
EXIT 264 NB
OLD AIRPORT RD
L O W D R
EXIT 262 SB
EXIT 265 N B
EXIT 264 SB
JUNI
EXIT 265 SB
N
AZALEA DR
M E D A S T
F R E D D I E D R
J E F F E R S O N L N
A V I AT I O N D R
T E R M I N A L D R
ENTR 266 SB
TON LN
H A L M A R C V
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
D
R
SUDDUTH DR
G A R D E N M E A D O W D R
H I C K O R Y T R E E D R
S HANGAR DR
G A R D E N VIE W D R
I N D U S T R I A L P A R K C I R
WWRIGHT BR OTHERS DR
R A N D Y S T
S T E A R M A N D R
A N V I S T A L N
O S A G E
CORSAIR DR
K
L
E
I
N
C
T
DAVID FERRETTI DR
N IH 35 NB
A
Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone
P e c a n B r a n c h
LAKE W AY D R
μ
§¨¦35
§¨¦35
1 in = 1,000 ft
EXHIBIT 'A' - AIRPORT ROAD LOCATION MAP
Mon. YYYYDate: Job No:Job No
Tel: 512-879-0400 Fax: 512-879-0499
Brown & Gay Engineers, Inc.
V:
\
0
1
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
C
i
t
y
_
G
e
o
r
g
e
t
o
w
n
\
P
e
c
a
n
_
B
r
a
n
c
h
_
D
r
i
v
e
\
0
3
_
C
A
D
D
\
L
a
k
e
w
a
y
D
r
.
m
x
d
Sheet 1 of 17
EXHIBIT B
The work to be performed by the Engineer under this contract consists of providing engineering
services required for the design and preparation of plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E)
for the widening and reconstruction of Airport Road from Lakeway Drive to Aviation Drive,
inclusive of intersection improvements at Lakeway Drive and IH-35 southbound frontage
road (SBFR) improvements. This project shall involve:
Scope of Services
• Engineering analyses, designs and associated details necessary to produce an
approximately 30% complete Plans, Specifications and Estimate (PS&E) package for the
intersection improvements, the widening and reconstruction of Airport Road and the IH-
35 SBFR improvements,
• Engineering analyses, designs and associated details necessary to produce a 100%
complete PS&E package for the intersection improvements.
The Engineer shall perform all work and prepare all deliverables in accordance with the latest
version of the City of Georgetown’s specifications, standards and manuals. Whenever possible,
City of Georgetown standard drawings.
The Engineer shall perform quality control and quality assurance (QA/QC) on all deliverables
associated with this project.
The Engineer shall provide traffic control in accordance with Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control Devices (TMUTCD
ROUTE AND DESIGN STUDIES (Function Code 110)
) when performing onsite activities associated with this contract.
A. Data Collection – Obtain and review existing data from the City and TxDOT as detailed
in Exhibit A. Perform field reconnaissance of project site. Coordinate to obtain project
specific files for adjacent project.
B. Design Concept Conference (DCC) – Schedule and attend a Design Concept Conference
with the City of Georgetown. Submit to the City a completed Design Summary Report
(DSR) along with preliminary typical sections and construction cost estimate at least two
weeks prior to the meeting. The Engineer shall provide someone to take notes during the
meeting. Revise the DSR per DCC meeting comments and submit to the City.
C. Geotechnical Investigations – Provide recommended pavement designs.
1. Drill four (4) soil borings for pavement to depths of 15 feet below the existing
ground surface. Total drilling footage is 60 feet.
2. The soil borings will be properly backfilled with bentonite chips and a single lift of
cold patch asphalt where applicable. The soil samples will be obtained using Shelby
tubes and/or split-spoon samplers. Field-testing of soil samples will include pocket
penetrometer in the cohesive soils and Standard Penetration Test (SPT) in the
cohesionless soils.
Sheet 2 of 17
3. All the field sampling and laboratory tests will be performed according to typical
geotechnical standards, where applicable, or with other well established procedures.
HVJ will perform appropriate laboratory tests on soil samples recovered from the
borings. Laboratory testing will include moisture content, liquid limit, plastic limit
and percent passing the #200 analysis tests.
4. Pavement Design Scope - Design two flexible pavement section alternatives (HMAC
surface over FLEX base and HMAC surface over HMAC base) to achieve a 20 year
design life. Collect non-destructive testing (NDT) using the Falling Weight
Deflectometer (FWD) to characterize the in-situ strengths of the existing pavement
and subgrade soils.
Use NDT on existing roadways to quickly evaluate the in-situ strengths of the
existing HMAC, base, and subgrade soil layers. These tests provide good data along
the existing project alignment and can be used to:
a. identify existing conditions and changes in the underlying subgrade;
b. locate and select geotechnical boring locations; and
c. determine the structural quality for both the existing pavement layers and the
underlying subgrade.
These data when analyzed can be used to determine the efficacy of recycling the in-
situ materials as a design alternative, which can save time and money for the final
construction.
The pavement design will include consideration of traffic loads, lab test results, and
borings. The AASHTO pavement design procedure will be followed, using the
DARWin analysis program. The traffic data will be developed by HVJ for pavement
design, based on current traffic count data to be collected as part of HVJ’s scope.
Traffic data required includes current and projected AADT traffic counts, growth
rates, truck percentages, and truck load factors. It is understood that future traffic on
Airport Road is subject to change due to growth on the City of Georgetown and the
importance of the Georgetown Airport industry.
5. Engineering Report Deliverables – Preliminary and final geotechnical and
pavement design report will be prepared.
a. The following items will be included in the report: Site Vicinity map, Geology
map, Plan of borings, Boring logs, Laboratory test results summary,
Groundwater conditions, Generalized subsurface conditions, Pavement
thickness design, Subgrade stabilization, if determined necessary, and General
earthwork recommendations.
ENVIRONMENTAL (Function Code 120)
A. Environmental Documentation – Environmental services will include studies and
documentation required to comply with the Endangered Species Act, Clean Water Act
and Texas Antiquities Code for the various regulating authorities, including the Texas
Sheet 3 of 17
Historical Commission (THC), U.S. Army Corp of Engineers (USACE), U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS), Williamson County Conservation Foundation (WCCF) and the
City of Georgetown.
Hazardous Materials Initial Site Assessment – A hazardous materials initial site
assessment shall be completed based on a regulatory records review, assessment of
current and past land uses and field reconnaissance. This assessment will identify
potential hazardous material sites that may be impacted by the proposed project. The
results of this assessment will be documented in a Hazardous Materials Technical Report.
Waters of the U.S. Determination – Wetlands, waterbodies, regulated special aquatic sites
and other waters of the U.S. will be investigated in the project area. Wetland and
waterbody boundaries will be mapped using a Trimble GeoXT Global Positioning System
(GPS) receiver that is accurate to within one meter. Delineations will be conducted in
accordance with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual along with the
2010 Regional Supplement for the Great Plains Region. For each wetland, a wetland
delineation data form will be prepared and representative photographs will be taken.
Maps will be provided of all pertinent information collected during the desktop review
and field visit.
B. The results of this assessment will be documented in a Waters of the U.S. Technical
Report.
Note: Preparation of a Section 404 permit and coordination with the USACE would be done, if
necessary, under a supplemental agreement.
C. Threatened and Endangered Species Habitat Assessment – A habitat assessment and
preliminary survey for federal threatened and endangered species will be performed in
the project area. Specific tasks include the following:
1. Perform a review of data from the USFWS, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department
Natural Diversity Database, geologic maps, topographic maps, soil data, project
aerials and other additional resources that may indicate the presence of potentially
suitable threatened and endangered species habitat.
2. Perform a field investigation to identify potentially suitable threatened and
endangered species habitat within the project area. Site conditions will be
documented with regards to vegetation, soils, geology and any observations of
species or evidence of species in the vicinity of the project.
The results of this assessment will be documented in a Threatened and Endangered
Species Technical Report.
Note: If it is determined that adverse impacts to species or their habitat cannot be avoided,
preparation of a Biological Assessment or Biological Evaluation and Section 10 consultation
with USFWS would be required; however, this consultation is not included in this scope and
would be completed under a supplemental agreement.
Sheet 4 of 17
D. Historic Resources Assessment – A historic resources assessment will be conducted in the
project area to satisfy requirements of the Texas Administrative Code. Specific tasks
include the following:
1. A field survey of each historic-age resource (defined in accordance with 36 CFR 60 as
a building, structure, object, historic district or non-archeological site at least 45 years
old at the time of letting) will be conducted in the project’s APE. Photographic
documentation along with identifying information for each identified historic-age
resource will be provided, including resource address (or UTM coordinates),
direction of the photograph, style and type of resource, National Register of Historic
Places (NRHP) criteria eligibility and resource integrity issues. In addition a location
map identifying each historic-age resource within the APE will be provided.
2. A THC Request for SHPO Consultation form will be completed summarizing the
findings of the field survey and a cover letter to THC to be used during agency
consultation. Furthermore, this documentation will contain sufficient detail and
clarity to provide the THC with a basis for making determinations of NRHP
eligibility without requiring submission of additional documentation.
The results of this assessment will be documented in a Historic Resources Technical
Report.
Note: Compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (for projects
with federal funding or involvement) is not included in this work authorization. If necessary,
these services will be provided under a supplemental agreement.
The following services are not included in this work authorization, but can be performed, if
needed, under a supplemental work authorization.
ADDITIONAL SERVICES
• Meetings with Affected Property Owners, Public Meeting or Public Hearing
• USACE Section 404 Permit Preconstruction Notification or Individual Permit
• Phase I or II Environmental Site Assessment to American Society for Testing and Materials
Standards
• Cultural Resource Compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act
• Documentation to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act
RIGHT OF WAY DATA (Function Code 130)
A. Review and Update Current Right of Way Map
1. Coordinate regarding updates to boundary surveys and ownership information.
B. Utility Coordination
Efforts to ensure utility relocations and adjustments required to accommodate the
proposed project development shall include Subsurface Utility Engineering, Field
Surveys, Utility Adjustment Coordination and Utility Engineering Services.
Sheet 5 of 17
1. A list of the utility owners contact information shall be developed from the
preliminary survey and maintained throughout project development.
2. Initial notifications of the project details and expected timelines for project
development shall be mailed to all utility owners existing within the project limits.
3. A recommended test hole location map shall be developed based the potential utility
conflict areas determined from the review of the existing utilities and proposed
designs.
4. As required to more accurately define the location of existing utilities and the limits
of potential conflicts, Level C Subsurface Utility Engineering shall be performed.
Proper coordination with the utility owners as well as appropriate traffic handling
measures shall be implemented.
5. Upon determination of required relocation and/or adjustments, intense coordination
with impacted utility owners shall be initiated. Utility agreements in accordance
with City and TxDOT guidelines shall be prepared and executed with each impacted
utility owner. A utility conflict list and tracking report shall be developed and
maintained throughout the duration of the relocation effort. Periodic reviews of
utility adjustment designs shall be performed and guidance on project timelines for
relocation budgeting shall be provided.
6. Based on relocation and adjustment designs, the MicroStation V8 file shall be
updated to indicate new locations as well as delineate the limits of existing utilities
to remain and to be abandoned.
7. Coordination meetings, public and individual, shall be held as necessary to facilitate
utility conflict identification and resolution. It is estimated that 2 public and 12
individual meetings will be required.
PROJECT MANAGEMENT (Function Code 145)
A. Meetings
1. Attend and document Kickoff Meeting at the City of Georgetown Office.
2. Attend and document Progress Meetings at the City Office. Assume eight meetings
shall be required.
3. Attend and document Utility Coordination Meetings at the City Office. Assume
three meetings shall be required.
Sheet 6 of 17
B. General Contract Administration
1. Develop monthly invoices and progress reports.
2. Design coordination with the City.
FIELD SURVEYING (Function Code 150)
A. General
1. Surveys provided shall be in accordance with the Texas State Board of Land
Surveying and the applicable sections of the TxDOT Generalized Scope of Services.
2. Survey field notes shall be submitted as requested by the City.
3. Unless previously obtained, the Engineer shall obtain right-of-entry (ROE)
agreements with property owners for the required field surveys (short of litigation)
using forms approved by or provided by the City.
4. Verify and compare previously located utility data with current ground conditions.
Contact the One-Call System in advance of performing field surveys so that data
collection includes ties to location of marked utilities. Reasonable attempts to
coordinate with utility owners shall be made to achieve efficiency in data collection.
B. Topographic Surveys for Engineering Design and Hydraulic Analysis
1. Reasonable attempts shall be made to recover existing horizontal control points.
Additional control shall be established to adequately position horizontal control
points as needed for project design activities and plan notations thereof. Control
points shall be established with significant conformance to current specifications for
primary control. Control points shall be set to provide a reasonable assurance of
survival during and after construction activities. Where possible, reference ties to
permanent features shall be provided for each established horizontal control point.
Data for the horizontal control shall be based on Texas State Plane, Central Zone,
NAD 83 (93) derived from the Online Positioning User Services (OPUS) solutions
and verified by other measurement technologies.
2. Reasonable attempts at recovering and verifying existing vertical control shall be
made. Additional benchmarks, if needed, shall be established via differential level
loops from recovered known project controls. A vertical benchmark system shall be
perpetuated at approximate 1,000 foot intervals for future reference on the plans and
maintained to construction, if necessary.
3. Survey files with previously obtained project data shall be compared to and merged
with survey files generated through this proposal. In areas of uncertainty, changes
in previous existing conditions, and/or limited topographic information, additional
data shall be collected as directed by the Project Engineer.
4. Data collection shall consist of spot elevations for improvements, edge of roadway,
driveways, visible or marked utilities, drainage features, centerline of roadway and
grade breaks. Individual roadway cross sections shall be taken at intervals not to
Sheet 7 of 17
exceed 100 feet or as required to properly define the surface of the project and
generate accurate Digital Terrain Models (DTMs).
5. The survey shall include topographic features within approximately 1,500 feet from
each end of certain drainage features along the roadway or a sufficient distance to
ensure and/or verify hydraulic cross sections can be developed to adequately
accommodate the 100-year rainfall event. Within these limits, the survey shall
extend approximately 100 feet left and right of the existing roadway centerline,
provided ROE allows such access.
6. Channel cross sections shall be provided from the face of the existing drainage
structures (4 sections each) to approximately 200 feet upstream and downstream.
The sections shall indicate any ground breaks, top of banks, toe of slopes, water
surface elevations, normal high water surface elevations (if discernible), etc., that
define the actual contour of the section and the overbank area, provided ROE allows
such access.
7. A stream alignment and profile extending the entire limits of the channel cross
sections described above shall be developed from the channel cross section
information.
8. A profile of the feature’s deck (the uppermost surface) and the low chord shall be
provided.
9. Topographic information shall include the limits of the existing concrete riprap
upstream, beneath and downstream of the existing drainage features.
10. Profiles of previously uncollected intersecting driveways within the project limits
shall extend a sufficient distance beyond the existing ROW to ensure adequate data
is available to determine tie-ins with proposed vertical alignment changes, provided
ROE allows such access.
11. Field surveys shall provide the locations of all small signs, mailboxes and other
visible surface features. Sign text, color, dimensions and standard sign design shall
be provided in accordance with City of Georgetown sign standards.
12. Survey shots shall be assigned a unique point number which provides a positive
identification of the point. Each point shall be assigned a feature number or feature
name using the TxDOT's standard feature table. An ASCII points file and a copy of
the print out shall be provided. Each line of the output data shall contain in this
order: the point number, northing, easting, elevation and the descriptive feature
code.
13. Surveyed data shall be provided in a Microstation (.dgn V8) compatible two
dimensional base map format. The survey shot point attributes shall appear on
separate levels.
14. A DTM shall be provided in a Microstation (.dgn V8) GEOPAK compatible three-
dimensional format.
Sheet 8 of 17
ROADWAY DESIGN CONTROLS (Function Code 160)
A. 30% Complete Plan Set
1. Intersection of Airport Road and Lakeway Drive
a. Geometric Design – Create horizontal and vertical alignments, typical sections
and resultant design cross sections to ensure compliance with current design
criteria. Delineate and discuss potential deficiencies with City staff. Review
constructability of preliminary design prior to final plan preparation.
b. Typical Sections – Develop existing and proposed roadway typical sections for
Airport Road and Lakeway Drive.
c. Alignment Data Sheets – Prepare horizontal and vertical alignment data
sheets with the Geopak baseline descriptions.
d. Plan & Profile Drawings – Prepare plan & profile sheets (1”=100’ Horizontal,
1”=10’ Vertical, 11” x 17” original sheets) for Airport Road and Lakeway Drive.
The sheets shall include the following:
i. Critical Basemap data in plan and profile (i.e. existing topography,
utilities, etc.).
ii. Control and benchmark data.
iii. Proposed roadway improvements including horizontal and vertical
roadway geometry, pavement edge geometry, drainage, grading and
miscellaneous related improvements.
e. Intersection Layouts – Develop intersection layouts that define all horizontal
and vertical geometry for the following intersections:
i. Airport Road and Lakeway Drive.
f. GEOPAK Roadway Model – Update the GEOPAK Roadway model provided
by TxDOT to accurately show the proposed roadway improvements for
utilization in design, analysis of construction sequencing, quantity calculations
and plan production.
g. Roadway Cross-Sections – Prepare design cross-sections (1”=30’ Horizontal,
1”=15’ Vertical, 11”x17” sheets) at intervals not to exceed 50 feet along the
proposed roadway improvement length to a sufficient level of detail to support
design decisions. Cross sections shall be prepared for Airport Road and
Lakeway Drive as needed.
2. Airport Road (Widening and Reconstruction to Aviation Dr)/IH-35 SBFR
a. Geometric Design – Create horizontal and vertical alignments, typical sections
and resultant design cross sections to ensure compliance with current design
criteria. Delineate and discuss potential deficiencies with City staff. Review
constructability of preliminary design prior to final plan preparation.
Sheet 9 of 17
b. Typical Sections – Develop existing and proposed roadway typical sections for
Airport Road.
c. Alignment Data Sheets – Prepare horizontal and vertical alignment data
sheets with the Geopak baseline descriptions.
d. Preliminary Schematic – Prepare schematic sheets for Airport Road. The
sheets shall include the following:
i. Critical Basemap data in plan and profile (i.e. existing topography,
utilities, etc.).
ii. Control and benchmark data.
iii. Proposed roadway improvements including horizontal and vertical
roadway geometry, pavement edge geometry, drainage, grading and
miscellaneous related improvements.
iv. ROW needs determination
e. Driveway/Acceleration/Deceleration Details – Develop details and layouts
that define all of the horizontal and vertical geometry for the widening of the
IH-35 Southbound frontage road and driveways.
f. GEOPAK Roadway Model – Update the GEOPAK Roadway model provided
by TxDOT to accurately show the proposed roadway improvements for
utilization in design, analysis of construction sequencing, quantity calculations
and plan production.
g. Roadway Cross-Sections – Prepare design cross-sections (1”=30’ Horizontal,
1”=15’ Vertical, 11”x17” sheets) at intervals not to exceed 50 feet along the
proposed roadway improvement length to a sufficient level of detail to support
design decisions. Cross sections shall be prepared for Airport Road as needed.
B. 100% Complete Plan Set
The following items shall be prepared for the intersection improvements at Airport Road
and Lakeway Drive:
1. Typical Sections – Finalize typical sections prepared during the 30% completion
phase.
2. Plan & Profile Drawings – Finalize plan & profile drawings prepared during the
30% completion phase.
3. Intersection Layouts – Finalize intersection layouts prepared during the 30%
completion phase. The following list of intersections reflects the current
configuration. Layouts for intersections that are constructed during the plan
development phase will be prepared accordingly.
a. Airport Road and Lakeway Drive
4. Driveway Details – Develop typical driveway designs and summarize driveway
(approximately 4, to be field verified) features including material type and geometric
Sheet 10 of 17
design. Driveways shall be constructed with HMAC or concrete, conforming with
existing.
5. Miscellaneous Roadway Details – Develop various details, as required, for
pavement, curb, riprap, etc.
6. Removal Layouts – Prepare removal layout sheets (1”=100’) showing all features
that are to be removed including pavement, structures, signing, etc.
7. Roadway Cross Sections – Finalize roadway cross sections (1”=30’ Horizontal;
1”=15’ Vertical, 11”x17” sheets) prepared during the 30% completion phase. Cross
sections shall be prepared for Airport Road and Lakeway Drive.
DRAINAGE (Function Code 161)
A. 30% Complete Plan Set (Submitted separately for each of the follow packages)
1. Intersection of Airport Road and Lakeway Drive
a. Incorporate all design surveys into computer aided drafting and develop
topographies and surfaces. These data shall be utilized to develop drainage
areas, hydrology and hydraulics. This shall include topographic working
drawings to prepare the preliminary drainage design.
b. Develop storm water hydrology for the ultimate roadway section throughout
the limits of the project. The hydrology shall be modeled utilizing HEC-HMS
with TxDOT drainage criteria. The model shall incorporate the 10%, 4% and
1% annual chance storm (10-year, 25-year and 100-year) events. Modeling shall
develop storm water flows to all cross culverts and roadway conveyances.
Based on the data developed, drainage infrastructure shall be designed in a
preliminary format for the project area. The level of detail shall be sufficient to
establish cost estimates and required easements and possession and use
agreements for the construction of the proposed drainage structures and
channel improvements.
c. Develop preliminary hydraulics to all cross culvert conveyances and the
roadway system.
d. Develop preliminary designs for all cross drainage structures throughout the
project limits. The cross drainage shall be modeled with HEC-RAS.
e. Develop preliminary designs for proposed storm water collection systems for
the proposed curb-and-gutter portion of the project area. Storm sewer designs
shall be developed using Geopak Drainage.
f. Establish the preliminary water quality requirements for the ultimate roadway
section. Designs shall be based on the new impervious cover that shall be
established with the ultimate build out of the project and current Texas
Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) requirements for construction
within the EARZ. Design efforts shall prioritize combining conveyance
Sheet 11 of 17
infrastructure with water quality and providing alternatives to detention
basins in an effort to minimize project costs. Options shall be preliminarily
designed and presented to the City and TxDOT for review. The preferred
option shall be included in the preliminary design.
g. Develop preliminary drainage easement requirements for the project area.
h. Coordinate the preliminary design with the City of Georgetown. Comments
and direction shall be incorporated into final designs.
2. Airport Blvd (Widening and Reconstruction to Aviation Dr)/IH-35 SBFR
a. Establish the preliminary water quality requirements for the ultimate roadway
section. Designs shall be based on the new impervious cover that shall be
established with the ultimate build out of the project and current Texas
Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) requirements for construction
within the EARZ. Design efforts shall prioritize combining conveyance
infrastructure with water quality and providing alternatives to detention
basins in an effort to minimize project costs. Options shall be preliminarily
designed and presented to the City and TxDOT for review. The preferred
option shall be included in the preliminary design.
b. Develop preliminary drainage easement requirements for the project area.
c. Coordinate the preliminary design with the City of Georgetown. Comments
and direction shall be incorporated into final designs.
B. 100% Complete Plan Set
1. Intersection of Airport Road and Lakeway Drive
a. Develop final designs for all cross drainage structures within the project limits.
The cross drainage shall be modeled with HEC-RAS. All cross drainage
structures shall be illustrated in plan profile sheets as well as detail sheets in
the 100% plans. Grading to existing ground elevations shall be detailed as well
as elevations for flow lines and headwalls. Hydraulic grade lines for the 4%
and 1% annual chance storm (25-year and 100-year) events shall be illustrated
in the profile views. Designs for conveyance to reduce erosion shall be
completed and detailed in the plans.
b. Develop final designs for the storm water collection systems for the curb-and-
gutter portion of the project limits. Storm sewer systems shall be analyzed and
designed using Geopak Drainage. This shall be accomplished in conjunction
with elements for water quality for new impervious cover within the EARZ.
The design shall consider curb and gutter systems, roadside channels,
extended detention basins, etc. in order to develop the most applicable and cost
effective system for the project. Flow lines shall be detailed as well as
hydraulic grade lines for the 20% and 1% annual chance storm (5-year and 100-
Sheet 12 of 17
year) events. All drainage infrastructure shall be designed and presented in
the plans in plan and profile.
c. Design storm water conveyance to existing streams and channel ways. Design
shall include conveyance for positive drainage and shall check current water
surface elevations to proposed water surface elevations after project
completion.
d. Establish the final detention requirements resulting from the additional
impervious cover constructed with this project. Coordinate with the
Developer’s engineer to incorporate roadway detention requirements into a
single detention facility designed by the Developer for all site detention.
e. Establish the final requirements for water quality for the ultimate roadway
section. Designs shall be based on the new impervious cover that shall be
established with the ultimate build out of the project and current TCEQ
requirements for construction within the EARZ. Design efforts shall prioritize
combining conveyance infrastructure with water quality and providing
alternatives to detention basins in an effort to minimize project costs. Options
shall be designed and presented to the City for review. The preferred option
shall be included in the final design and submitted to the TCEQ for review and
acceptance.
f. Existing utility locations shall be illustrated in the drainage plan profile sheets.
g. Develop final design for the cross culverts. Develop options for reducing the
footprint of the associated floodplain upstream and downstream of the
proposed Lakeway Drive crossings. The final design shall include grading
plans, proposed flow lines, channel cross sections, connection to existing
channel sections and hydraulic grade lines for the 4% and 1% chance storm (25-
year and 100-year) events.
h. Develop final drainage easement requirements for the project area. Limits of
permanent drainage easements shall be kept to a minimum. Layouts for
drainage easements shall be prepared for review with the City. Details will be
provided for the production of metes and bounds for acquisition.
i. Prepare a global Drainage Area Map for the entire project.
j. Prepare Hydraulic Data Sheets as appropriate reflecting the results of the
hydraulic analyses and designs for proposed cross road culverts.
k. Prepare a Hydraulic Report, documenting the results of the hydrologic studies,
hydraulic analysis and designs. Include the preliminary Hydraulic Data and
Drainage Area Map sheets and the Bridge Layout sheet in the report.
l. Develop summary of final quantities for all drainage infrastructure and
prepare cost estimates based on current bid data.
Sheet 13 of 17
m. Coordinate with the City of Georgetown to review the final drainage design,
phasing for the project, utility conflicts and relocations, water quality options,
etc. All comments and direction shall be incorporated into final designs.
n. Water Pollution Abatement Plan (WPAP) – Prepare a WPAP that shall serve
as the Edwards Aquifer Protection Plan for the project. The WPAP shall
contain a geologic assessment and the temporary and permanent best
management practices (BMPs) proposed for the project. For the preparation of
the WPAP, the TCEQ Complying with Edwards Aquifers Rules - Technical
Guidance shall be used for the selection of the proposed BMPs. Obtain
approval of the WPAP by TCEQ prior the start of any activity that could cause
runoff contamination.
o. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans (SW3P) – Develop SW3P, on separate
sheets (1”=100’ scale) from (but in conformance with) the Traffic Control Plan
(TCP), to minimize potential impact to receiving waterways. The SW3P shall
include text describing the plan, quantities, type and locations of erosion
control devices and any required permanent erosion control measures. The
SW3P shall be prepared according to the Edwards Aquifer Rules.
SIGNING, MARKINGS AND SIGNALIZATION (Function Code 162)
A. Traffic Study (Intersection of Airport Rd and Lakeway Drive)
1. Data Collection
The Engineer shall conduct a site inspection at the study location. The field work
shall include the following:
a. Conduct a field investigation, obtain photographs and prepare an existing
condition diagram for the study locations. Record traffic characteristics
observed while in the field.
b. Obtain crash records at the study locations from the City and State for the most
recent thirty-six (36) month period.
c. Manually record turning movement counts at the intersection for 12 hours
during a typical weekday (Tuesday, Wednesday or Thursday) for the following
period: 7:00 a.m. – 7:00 p.m.
2. Crash Analysis
The Engineer shall analyze crash records provided by the City and State and prepare
a summary of the crashes in a collision diagram for the study locations.
3. Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis
The Engineer shall perform a traffic signal warrant analysis for the intersection
following the guidelines published in the Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control
Devices, current edition.
Sheet 14 of 17
4. Deliverables
The Engineer shall prepare and submit two (2) copies of a traffic study report for the
location to the City, which summarizes the findings of the traffic counts, warrant
analysis, and field investigation. The report shall include an existing condition
diagram, field photographs, traffic count data, a collision diagram, and any
recommended improvements (if appropriate). Revisions to the report shall be made
based on comments received from the City.
B. 30% Complete Plan Set
Preliminary traffic signal design plans shall be developed for the intersection with Airport
Road and Lakeway Drive because signal design and operation shall impact the geometric
design of the intersection. The following items shall be prepared:
1. Preliminary Traffic Signal Layouts – The preliminary layouts shall show the
proposed configuration of major signal items such as signal poles, controller and
electrical service. Pedestrian signal poles shall be laid out as a function of the
crosswalk and ramp locations to meet American with Disabilities Act (ADA) design
requirements. The proposed signal indications and phasing sequence shall be
identified for early review by the City of Georgetown Transportation Engineer. The
proposed approach roadway configuration shall be designed for optimum signal
operation.
C. 100% Complete Plan Set
The following items shall be prepared the intersection improvements at Airport Road and
Lakeway Drive:
1. Signing and Markings Layouts – Prepare signing and pavement markings layouts
(1”=100’ scale) for Airport Road and Lakeway Drive. The layouts shall include
roadway layout, centerline with stationing, culverts and other structures, existing
signs to remain, to be removed or to be relocated, proposed signs (illustrated and
numbered) and proposed permanent markings (illustrated and labeled) including
pavement markings, object markers and delineation. Prepare details in accordance
with TMUTCD, TxDOT Sign Crew Field Book
2. Summary of Small Signs Tabulation – Prepare and complete standard summary of
small signs sheet.
, and the applicable City of
Georgetown standards.
3. Sign Details – Prepare details for signs not included in the State’s standard details
sheets.
4. Traffic Signal Plans – Prepare detailed traffic signal installation plans for the
intersection of Airport Road and Lakeway Drive accommodating the ultimate
roadway configuration to the extent practicable. The following plans sheets shall be
prepared:
Sheet 15 of 17
a. Traffic Signal Quantity Summary Sheet
b. General Notes for Traffic Signal Installation
c. Proposed Traffic Signal Layouts, showing the proposed signal poles, controller,
vehicle and pedestrian signals, vehicle detection devices, intersection
illumination, signal communications, conduit, ground boxes, electrical service
and signal pole type chart.
d. Signal Phasing and Wiring Diagrams, showing the conduits and cables chart,
cable termination chart, electrical service specifications, phasing diagram
orientation diagram, miscellaneous cable charts and street name sign designs.
e. Traffic Signal Elevations Sheets, showing elevation drawings for each signal
pole with the location of signal heads, signs and detection devices.
f. Traffic Signal Striping Sheets, showing the proposed crosswalk and stop line
locations in relation to the ramps.
g. Traffic Signal Installation Details, showing miscellaneous installation details
for vehicle detection, signal communications, pedestrian signals and
pushbuttons.
h. Traffic Signal pole standards, showing the types and sizes of the proposed
poles, mast arms and illumination arms.
i. Signal Pole Foundations Standards, showing the size, type and depth of the
foundation for each signal pole and pedestrian pole.
MISCELLANEOUS (ROADWAY) (Function Code 163)
A. 30% Complete Plan Set
1. Traffic Control Plans (TCP), Detours and Sequence of Construction – A conceptual
TCP shall be developed including sequence of construction and the existing and
proposed traffic control devices (including signs, barricades, pavement markings,
etc.). The TCP shall also include the evaluation of temporary drainage throughout
the construction process to ensure positive flow during construction. TCP shall
based on the TMUTCD
a. Sequence of construction narrative.
and the latest City of Georgetown Standards. Plan sheets
shall include:
b. Traffic control typical sections for each phase of construction
c. Advance Warning Signs.
d. TCP layouts showing work zones, number of lanes open, advance warning
signs, typical sections and any necessary detour geometry.
e. Intersection phasing layouts.
Sheet 16 of 17
2. Miscellaneous Drawings – Prepare the following miscellaneous drawings:
a. Title Sheet
b. Index of Sheets
3. Cost Estimates – Prepare a construction cost estimate for the 30% design.
B. 100% Complete Plan Set
1. Traffic Control Plans (TCP), Detours and Sequence of Construction – A detailed
TCP shall be developed including sequence of construction and the existing and
proposed traffic control devices (including signs, barricades, pavement markings,
etc.). The TCP shall also include the design of temporary drainage throughout the
construction process to ensure positive flow during construction. TCP shall based
on the TMUTCD
a. Sequence of construction narrative.
and the latest City of Georgetown Standards. Plan sheets shall
include:
b. Traffic control typical sections for each phase of construction
c. Advance Warning Signs.
d. TCP layouts showing work zones, number of lanes open, advance warning
signs, typical sections and any necessary detour geometry.
e. Intersection phasing layouts.
f. Any necessary miscellaneous drawings relevant to traffic control
g. Traffic Control Standard sheets
h. Traffic Control Summary of Quantity Tables
2. Summary of Quantities – Prepare quantity summary sheets for the following
quantities:
a. Removals
b. Roadway (including earthworks)
c. Driveways
d. Drainage
e. Small Signs
f. Pavement Markings
g. Traffic Signals
h. SW3P
3. Cost Estimates – Prepare detailed construction cost estimates. An estimate shall be
provided at each submittal (30% and 100% PS&E)
Sheet 17 of 17
4. General Notes and Specifications – Using the latest City of Georgetown Master
General Notes, identify required general notes. Also, develop project specific
general notes for the items required. City of Georgetown requirements shall be
incorporated as necessary.
5. Standard Drawings – Select the standard City of Georgetown drawings applicable
to the project.
6. Construction Time Estimate – Prepare a construction time estimate in Primavera or
other approved software that shows the time required to construct the project.
7. Bid Proposal – Prepare the project bid proposal that shall include the following:
a. General Notes
b. Standard and Special Specifications
c. Special Provisions
d. Reference Item list
e. Bid Tabulation Sheets
f. Applicable Legal Documents
8. Miscellaneous Drawings – Prepare the following miscellaneous drawings:
a. Title Sheet / Index of Sheets
b. Environmental Permits, Issues and Commitments (EPIC) Sheet
c. Project Layout
Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT C
Schedule of Owner’s Responsibilities
Data for the project that the City has available (i.e. environmental documents, preliminary
schematic design, correspondence, materials, previously conducted studies regarding
proposed improvements, etc.)
Example estimate, general notes master file, sample specification list and related hard
copy documentation for the Engineer’s use in preparing preliminary estimate, general
notes and specifications.
Diskette with files containing templates for the title sheet, plan profile sheet, design cross
section sheets, the Austin District storm water pollution prevention plan (SW3P) index
sheet and design files of any Austin District standard sheets that may be applicable to the
project.
Available existing right‐of‐way maps for the project.
Available as‐built plans from utility companies existing within the project limits.
Assist the Engineer, as necessary, in obtaining any required data and information from
local, regional, state and federal agencies.
Exhibit D - Estimate Fee Schedule - Airport Rd
FC DESCRIPTION BGE HVJ CP&Y TOTAL
FC 110 ROUTE AND DESIGN STUDIES 5,718.00$ $16,770.00 22,488.00$
FC 120 ENVIRONMENTAL 17,472.00$ 17,472.00$
FC 130 ROW 44,864.00$ 44,864.00$
FC 150 FIELD SURVEYING AND PHOTOGRAMMERTRY 29,453.00$ 29,453.00$
FC 160 ROADWAY DESIGN CONTROLS 45,648.00$ 45,648.00$
FC 161 DRAINAGE 110,730.00$ 110,730.00$
FC 162 SIGNING, PAVEMENT MARKINGS & SIGNALIZATION 99,298.00$ 99,298.00$
FC 163 MISCELLANEOUS ROADWAY 50,952.00$ 50,952.00$
FC 145 GENERAL MANAGEMENT / COORDINATION 56,720.00$ 56,720.00$
EXPENSES 7,659.37$ $415.63 8,075.00$
451,042.37$ 16,770.00$ 17,887.63$ 485,700.00$
Exhibit D - BGE SR. PROJECT SENIOR PROJECT SENIOR ENGR 3-MAN
MANAGER ENGINEER ENGINEER EIT TECH TECH RPLS TECHNICIAN CREW CLERICAL TOTAL
FC 110 ROUTE AND DESIGN STUDIES 6 8 12 8 4 0 0000 38
FC 130 ROW 28 73 796868 0 0000 316
FC 150 FIELD SURVEYING AND PHOTOGRAMMERTRY 0 0 32 0 0 0 44 120 168 8 372
FC 160 ROADWAY DESIGN CONTROLS 46 136 120 146 212 212 0000 872
FC 161 DRAINAGE 141646436681800000 796
FC 162 SIGNING, PAVEMENT MARKINGS & SIGNALIZATION 64 28 24 104 32 134 0004 390
FC 163 MISCELLANEOUS ROADWAY 24 104 64 108 30 94 0000 424
FC 145 GENERAL MANAGEMENT / COORDINATION (12 MONTHS)53 65 0 49 0 0 0 0 0 12 179
TOTAL HOURS 235 578 395 849 354 620 44 120 168 24 3387
MANHOUR RATES 225.00$ 174.00$ 138.00$ 110.00$ 110.00$ 98.00$ 120.00$ 85.00$ 150.00$ 69.00$ 130.91$
TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS 52,875.00$ 100,572.00$ 54,510.00$ 93,390.00$ 38,940.00$ 60,760.00$ 5,280.00$ 10,200.00$ 25,200.00$ 1,656.00$ 443,383.00$
EXPENSE COST 7,659.37$
TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL 451,042.37$
MANHOUR ESTIMATE - BGE
# OF SR. PROJECT SENIOR PROJECT SENIOR ENGR 3-MAN
SHTS MANAGER ENGINEER ENGINEER EIT TECH TECH RPLS TECHNICIAN CREW CLERICAL TOTAL
FC 110 ROUTE AND DESIGN STUDIES
1 Data Collection 24884 26
1 Design Concept Conference 4 4 4 12
SUBTOTAL 0 6 8 12 8 4 0 0000 38
FC 130 ROW
1 Right of Way Map N/A 4 8 24 36
2 List of utility owners N/A 2 8 10
3 Utility Notification N/A 4 12 16
4 Test hole location map N/A 2 6 8 16
5 Level C Subsurface Utility Engineering N/A 4 24 8 36
6 Determine utility conflicts N/A 4 16 4 24
7 Utility Notification N/A 4 8 12
8 Proposed Utility File N/A 4 16 24 44
9 Coordination meetings (14 meetings) N/A 24 49 49 122
SUBTOTAL 0 28 73 79 68 68 0 0000 316
FC 150 FIELD SURVEYING AND PHOTOGRAMMERTRY
1 Design Topo Survey with a DTM N/A 24 32 96 168 320
2 Re-alignment ROW Parcel Map N/A 8 12 24 8 52
SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 32 0 0 0 44 120 168 8 372
FC 160 ROADWAY DESIGN CONTROLS
Intersection of Airport Road and Lakeway Drive
1 Geometric Design 416 2424 68
2 Typical Sections 3 4 8 18 24 54
3 Alignment Data Sheets 2 4 4 8 8 24
4 Roadway Plan & Profile Sheets (1"=100' scale) 5 4 8 20 48 80
5 Intersection Layouts 1 4 8 12 12 36
6 Driveway Details 1 2 6 6 14
7 Miscellaneous Roadway Details 1 2 6 6 14
8 Removal Layouts 5 4 16 20 40
9 GEOPAK Roadway Model N/A 0
10 Roadway Cross Sections 27 8 16 24 60 108
SUBTOTAL 45 24 68 40 98 84 124 0000 438
Airport Road/IH-35 SBFR
1 Geometric Design 41640 40 100
2 Typical Sections 4 4 12 8 24 40 88
3 Alignment Data Sheets 1 4 4 8 16
4 Preliminary Schematic 30% 4 4 8 16 24 52
5 Driveway/Acceleration Details 3 4 8 16 28
6 ROW Needs Determination N/A 2 8 4 8 22
7 GEOPAK Roadway Model N/A 0
8 Roadway Cross Sections 20 8 16 24 80 128
SUBTOTAL 32 22 68 80 48 128 88 0000 434
SUBTOTAL 77 46 136 120 146 212 212 0000 872
FC 161 DRAINAGE
Intersection of Airport Road and Lakeway Drive
1 HEC-RAS modelling (2 crossings) N/A 12 24 24 60
2 Storm Sewer modelling N/A 8 24 40 72
3 Determine detention requirements N/A 8 16 24
4 Determine WQ requirements N/A 8 16 24
5 Identify drainage easement requirements N/A 2 6 16 8 32
6 Drainage Area Maps (external) 2 4 16 16 36
7 Drainage Area Maps (internal) 5 2 4 24 24 54
8 Hydrology calculations N/A 4 16 20
9 Hydraulic calculations N/A 4 24 28
10 Hydraulic Data Sheets 4 4 16 24 44
11 Hydraulic Report N/A 2 16 16 4 38
12 Cross Culvert Layout (1) 1 2 4 8 12 26
13 Storm Sewer P&P 5 4 12 30 40 86
14 Quantities Summary 1 4 16 8 28
15 Address comments from COG N/A 2 8 16 16 42
16 WPAP N/A 24 40 12 76
17 SW3P 3 6 16 20 42
18 Coordinate with TCEQ N/A 12 4 16
SUBTOTAL 21 14 148 64 338 8 176 0000 748
TOTAL LABOR AND EXPENSE COSTS
FC DESCRIPTION
Airport Road/IH-35 SBFR
1 Determine WQ requirements N/A 8 16 24
2 Identify drainage easement requirements N/A 4 8 4 16
3 Address comments from COG N/A 4 4 8
SUBTOTAL 0 0 16 0 28 0 4 0000 48
SUBTOTAL 21 14 164 64 366 8 180 0000 796
FC 162 SIGNING, PAVEMENT MARKINGS & SIGNALIZATION
Intersection of Airport Road and Lakeway Drive
1 Traffic Study/Intersection Analysis 12 8 16 24 464
2 Data Collection 264 12
3 Crash Analysis 46 10
4 Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis 12 16 6 4 38
5 Signing and Pavement Marking Layouts (1"=100' scale) 3 8 12 8 24 52
6 Summary of Small Signs Tabulation 1 4 8 12
7 Sign Details 14 8 12
8 Traffic Signal Plans 0
9 Traffic Signal Quantity Summary 1 2 6 8 16
10 General Notes for Traffic Signal Installation 2 2 4 8 14
11 Proposed Traffic Signal layouts 2 4 12 16 32
12 Signal Phasing and Wiring Diagrams 2 4 12 16 32
13 Traffic Signal Elevations Sheet 2 2 8 10 20
14 Traffic Signal Striping Sheets 2 2 8 10 20
15 Traffic Signal Installation Details 2 4 8 12 24
16 Trafffic Signal Pole Standards 2 2 4 6 12
17 Signal Pole Foundation Sheet 1 4 8 8 20
SUBTOTAL 21 64 28 24 104 32 134 0004 390
FC 163 MISCELLANEOUS ROADWAY
Intersection of Airport Road and Lakeway Drive
1 Construction Sequence Narrative 1 4 8 4 8 24
2 Advance Warning Signs 1 4 4 8 8 24
3 TCP Typical Sections 2 4 8 16 16 44
4 TCP Layouts (1"=100' scale) 5 4 8 16 16 40 84
5 Summary of Quantities 1 4 16 8 28
6 Title Sheet/Index 2 2 8 4 8 8 12 42
7 Cost Estimate N/A 6 24 8 38
8 General Notes N/A 2 16 8 26
9 Specifications N/A 2 16 16 8 42
10 Standard Drawings 4 4210 20
11 Construction Days Estimate N/A 2 8 4 14
SUBTOTAL 12 20 90 64 92 26 94 0000 386
Airport Road/IH-35 SBFR
1 Conceptual Construction Sequence Narrative 1 4 8 4 16
2 Cost Estimate N/A 6 12 4 22
SUBTOTAL 1 4 14 0 16 4 0 0000 38
SUBTOTAL 13 24 104 64 108 30 94 0000 424
FC 145 GENERAL MANAGEMENT / COORDINATION (12 MONTHS)
1 Kickoff Meeting N/A 4 4 4 12
1 Progress Meetings (8) N/A 12 24 24 60
2 Utility Coordination Meetings (3) N/A 9 9 9 27
3 Submittal Meetings (3) N/A 12 12 12 36
4 Contract Administration N/A 16 16 12 44
SUBTOTAL 0 53 65 0 49 0 0 0 0 0 12 179
EXPENSE ESTIMATE
ITEM UNIT RATE QUANT TOTAL
Mileage MILE 0.565$ 1800 1,017.00$
Delivery EA 25.00$ 10 250.00$
Copies (11x17)EA 0.20$ 2000 400.00$
Copies (8.5x11)EA 0.10$ 500 50.00$
Meals-Per Diem (3 crewmembers x 12 days) DAY 46.00$ 36 1,656.00$
Lodging DAY 110.00$ 33 3,630.00$
Traffic Count - Gram Traffic Counting EA 600.00$ 1 600.00$
Miscellaneous LS 56.37$ 1 56.37$
7,659.37$
Field Investigation - Drilling and Soil Sampling No. Rate Units
Mobilization/Demobilization - Austin 1 @ $400.00 each $400.00
Drilling & Sampling - Soils 60 @ $16.00 per foot $960.00
Drilling & Sampling - Rock 0 @ $23.00 per foot $0.00
Support Truck 1 @ $100.00 per day $100.00
Plugging of soil borings 60 @ $6.00 per foot $360.00
Field Technician 8 @ $65.00 per hour $520.00
Vehicle Trips 2 @ $50.00 each $100.00
Traffic Control 1 @ $1,200.00 each $1,200.00
Sub Total $3,640.00
Laboratory Testing - Standard
Natural Moisture Content (ASTM D-2216) 8 @ $18.00 each $144.00
Atterberg Limits (Liquid and Plastic Limits, ASTM D-4318) 8 @ $65.00 each $520.00
Unconfined Compression Tests 0 @ $50.00 each $0.00
No 200 Sieve (ASTM D-1140) 8 @ $42.00 each $336.00
Consolidation Tests 0 @ $250.00 each $0.00
Swell Test 0 @ $150.00 each $0.00
Sulphates and Chlorides 4 @ $75.00 each $300.00
CBR 1 @ $450.00 each $450.00
Sub Total $1,750.00
FWD Testing and Traffic Counts
Mobilization/Demobilization 1 @ $200.00 each $200.00
FWD Equipment 1 @ $2,600.00 day $2,600.00
Traffic Control 1 @ $1,200.00 day $1,200.00
Traffic Counts for Pavement Design 2 @ $300.00 day $600.00
Subtotal $4,600.00
Geotechnical Engineering & Reporting
Senior Engineer, P.E. 4 @ $150.00 hr $600.00
Project Engineer, P.E. 8 @ $125.00 hr $1,000.00
Staff Engineer, EIT 8 @ $85.00 hr $680.00
Clerical/Administrative 2 @ $50.00 hr $100.00
Sub-Total $2,380.00
Pavement Engineering & Reporting
Senior Engineer, P.E. 5 @ $150.00 hr $750.00
Project Engineer, P.E. 19 @ $125.00 hr $2,375.00
Staff Engineer, EIT 15 @ $85.00 hr $1,275.00
Clerical/Administrative 0 @ $50.00 hr $0.00
Sub-Total $4,400.00
Total $16,770.00
Exhibit D - HVJ
Airport Road from Lakeway Drive to Aviation Drive
City of Georgetown
for Brown & Gay Engineers
HVJ Proposal No. AG1511320
Exhibit D ‐ CPY
TASK DESCRIPTION Project Sr. Env. Sr. Env. GIS Admin/ Total Total Labor
Manager Planner Specialist Operator Clerical Hours Cost
I. Project Administration and Coordination
A. Invoices and Progress Reports 4 4 8 $1,024.00
B. Meetings and Coordination 8 2 10 $1,780.00
II. Environmental Documentation
A. Hazardous Materials Initial Site Assessment 2 16 4 4 26 $3,064.00
B. Waters of the U.S. Determination 2 20 16 8 46 $4,280.00
C. Threatened and Endangered Species Habitat Assessment 2 20 16 4 42 $3,992.00
D. Historic Resources Assessment 2 20 2 4 28 $3,332.00
TOTAL HOURS 20 38 46 32 20 4 160
RATE PER HOUR $192.00 $122.00 $110.00 $70.00 $72.00 $64.00
TOTAL LABOR COST $3,840.00 $4,636.00 $5,060.00 $2,240.00 $1,440.00 $256.00 $17,472.00
TOTAL OTHER DIRECT EXPENSES $415.63
CP&Y TOTAL COST $17,887.63
OTHER DIRECT EXPENSES QUANTITY RATE UNIT TOTAL
Mileage 125 $0.565 MILE $70.63
Photocopies B/W (8.5" x 11") 100 $0.10 EACH $10.00
Photocopies B/W (11" x 17") 50 $0.20 EACH $10.00
HazMat Database Search 1 $250.00 EACH $250.00
GPS Rental 1 $75.00 EACH $75.00
TOTAL OTHER DIRECT EXPENSES $415.63
Biologist
Exhibit E
Airport Road
Project Schedule
Page 1 of 1 Exhibit E
2016
Description Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan
CONSULTANT TASKS
Start Date: March 1, 2015
Review Project Data
Geotechnical Investigation
Environmental Documentation
Utility Coordination
Survey
Roadway Design
Drainage Analysis
Typical Sections
Traffic Signal Layouts
Signing and Pavement Markings
Traffic Control Plans
WPAP
SW3P Plans
Cost Estimates
General Note and Specifications
Contract Time Determination
Bid Proposal
DCC Meeting u
Preliminary Engineering Submittal-Intersection u
30% Submittal-Intersection u
Incorporate Review Comments
100% Submittal-Intersection u
Incorporate Review Comments
Final Submittal-Intersection u
Letting (November 2015) - Intersection
Preliminary Engineering Submittal-Airport Rd Widening u
Incorporate Review Comments
Final Engineering Schematic Submittal-Airport Rd Widening u
Project Coordination with City
TxDOT TASKS / REVIEWS
Milestone Reviews
Work Authorization Termination Date: January 31, 2016
2015
City of Georgetown, Texas
Transportation Enhancement Corp
March 18, 2015
SUBJECT:
Consideration and possible action for approval of the 2015/2016 Transportation Improvement Program
(TIP)– Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Transportation Services Director, and Nat Waggoner, PMP®,
Transportation Analyst.
ITEM SUMMARY:
The Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation (GTEC) by statute must adopt a 5-year
Capital Improvement Program. The City of Georgetown GTEC By-laws and Overall Transportation
Plan refer to this as a Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). The process to complete the TIP
requires coordination and submittal of projects from the GTAB Board to GTEC. The GTEC/GTAB
TIP reflects the transportation projects that the GTEC (4B) Board have found eligible for funding, and
the status of those projects.
Staff is aware that revenue and bonding capacity for GTEC will be limited because of the expenditure
of GTEC funds for projects in the FY 14/15 TIP. The proposed GTEC TIP is a continuation of
development of those projects which staff feel will have the greatest economic and transportation
impact for the community. Changes to the GTEC/GTAB TIP are shown in bold in the 2015/16 Draft
GTEC/GTAB Transportation Improvement Program Project List. Several projects are related to the
proposed.
Staff has also included the Summit at Rivery Park TIA Improvements in the Draft GTEC TIP. GTEC
approved the TIA in October 2013 and directed staff to begin programming those improvements as
recommended. Funding for Year 1 of those improvements was delayed from last year’s TIP awaiting
completion of the Economic Development agreements related to the Convention Center and Hotel.
The proposed 2015 Bond Program List will be discussed in future GTAB meetings as staff works out a
programming and letting schedule.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff is recommending approval and submittal of the 5-year GTEC TIP to the GTEC Board and
proposed 2008 Bond programming in the draft 2015/16 Budget documents.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
n/a
SUBMITTED BY:
Edward G. Polasek, AICP
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
2014/15 Draft TIP Documents Backup Material
2015 Bond List Backup Material
3/04/2015
Project Spent/ Current 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 Summary Funds
Project Detail Description of Transportation Total Encumbered GTEC GTEC GTEC GTEC GTEC GTEC 5 Year Still
# Improvement Estimate Funding Funding Funding Funding Funding Funding Funding Total Needed*
Projects Submitted to GTEC for their TIP Process
AD IH-35/Williams Gateway Access Improvements (Rivery
Extension)$8,907,000 $65,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000 $5,907,000
BC Wolf Ranch Parkway (SH 29 (D.B. Wood) to SH 29
Bypass) (tied to bypass)$4,500,000 $1,330,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,170,000
AZ SH 29 Bypass (from RR 2243 to SH29) $18,920,000 $5,390,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,530,000
BK SH 29 Bypass (from IH 35 to RR 2243) $20,300,000 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $18,800,000
BL South East Inner Loop (Widening to 4 Lanes (IH 35 to
Rock Ride Lane))$19,950,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,500,000 $17,450,000
BO
FM 1460 Widening (Quail Valley south to '1,000 North of
CR114 in Round Rock)$44,565,400 $1,500,000 $450,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $42,615,400
XX Airport Road (IH35 to Lakeway)*** $6,700,000 $0 $1,700,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000,000
VV Airport Road (Lakeway to North of Halmar Cove)*** $7,500,000 $0 $3,030,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,470,000
QQ Airport Road (Berry Creek Drive south to Three Forks) $11,870,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,500,000 $0 $0 $2,500,000 $9,370,000
AE FM971/Northwest Blvd Bridge (Washam over IH35 to
Apple Creek)$12,825,000 $425,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,400,000
AG FM 971 (Terminus of NW/971 Bridge (QQ) to Gann St) $4,150,000 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,000,000
AF
Construct Northbound Frontage Road (FM 2338 to
Lakeway)$12,500,000 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,250,000 $2,500,000 $3,750,000 $9,900,000
CK Mays - Teravista Pkwy To Westinghouse Rd (WH TIRZ)$10,650,000 $300,000 $10,350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
BZ Mays - Westinghouse Rd to Blue Springs (WH TIRZ) $12,760,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,760,000
CE Blue Ridge Drive (WH TIRZ) $10,910,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,910,000
CJ Westinghouse Rd - Mays Street to FM 1460 (WH TIRZ)$18,530,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $18,530,000
UU Aviation Drive (Airport Road to IH 35) $4,200,000 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,900,000
WW Three Forks to Aviation Drive $2,625,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,625,000
AT SH 29 (IH 35 to Haven Lane) HEB TIA $5,000,000 $650,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,350,000
Riv TIA Rivery TIA Improvements $3,250,000 $750,000 $0 $1,400,000 $0 $0 $1,100,000 $0 $2,500,000 $0
Total $240,612,400 $12,460,000 $17,030,000 $2,900,000 $2,500,000 $2,500,000 $2,350,000 $2,500,000 $12,750,000 $199,687,400
Note: Tentative Schedule still subject to GTEC, GTAB and City Council approval, and bond letting for each fiscal year. These are estimates only and may change up until bond letting/funding each fiscal year.
* Funds Still Needed: in some cases this may include Federal/State Funding/Contributions
** Funds requested are for two lane construction only in ultimate ROW
*** Pecan Center Economic Development Project Includes partial funding
2015/16 DRAFT GTEC/GTAB TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP) PROJECT LIST
Project Complete Ongoing
Long
Term Notes Total Project
Costs
Amount
Issued3 "Balance"
Funds
Required to
Complete
SE 1/Maple √√√√Completed $ 6,000,000 $ 5,180,000 $ 820,000 $ -
DB Wood/Williams √√√√Completed $ 1,650,000 $ 1,370,000 $ 280,000 $ -
FM 1460 √√√√Under Construction
Spring 2015 $ 16,900,000 $ 7,300,000 $ 9,600,000 $ 4,400,000
SH 29 Bypass Routing
Study √√√√Ongoing $ 2,500,000 $ 1,250,000 $ 1,250,000 $ -
FM 971 √√√√
Partial - Intersection
improvements in 2012
and 2014-2016.
$ 13,200,000 $ 500,000 $ 12,700,000 $ 4,000,000
Berry Creek Drive √√√√ $ 3,900,000 $ - $ 3,900,000 $ 3,900,000
Total2: 44,150,000$ 15,600,000$ 28,550,000$ 12,300,000$
Anticipated Issuance Costs: 1,850,000$
Project Complete 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 Beyond
SE 1/Maple √√√√
DB Wood/Williams √√√√
Notes:
1 Total includes issuance costs.
2 Total does not include issuance costs.
3 Funds remaing after project has been completed have been rolled into the FM 1460 project.
2008 Road Bond Programming
FY 15/16 and beyond
Remaining: 33,955,000$
2008 Road Bond Summary
January 27, 2015
2008 Road Bonds Authorized1: 46,000,000$
Total Issued: 12,045,000$
New
Order OTP Roadway
Project Construction Project Costs Issuance
Net Cost
to Complete Cumulative
*C 2 AE Northwest Blvd Bridge - Fontana Dr To Austin Ave 7,093,938$ 11,020,000$ 275,500$ 12,397,500$ 12,397,500$
*C 3 AD Rivery Blvd Extension - Williams Dr To Northwest Blvd 5,500,000$ 5,907,000$ 147,675$ 6,645,375$ 19,042,875$
*C 4 AF IH 35 NB Frontage Road - Williams Dr To Lakeway Bridge 5,410,678$ 6,243,000$ 156,075$ 7,023,375$ 26,066,250$
*C 5 AZ1 Southwest Bypass - Wolf Ranch Pkwy To Leander Rd 16,665,000$ 13,530,000$ 338,250$ 15,221,250$ 41,287,500$
*C 6 BC Wolf Ranch Pkwy - DB Wood Dr To Southwest Bypass 2,650,000$ 3,168,000$ 79,200$ 3,564,000$ 44,851,500$
*C 7 -Intersection/Capital Pool 20,000,000$ 5,000,000$ 125,000$ 5,125,000$ 49,976,500$
*D 8 CS Leander Rd Bridge @ IH 35 8,000,000$ 4,500,000$ 112,500$ 4,612,500$ 54,589,000$
*C 9 -Sidewalk, Safety and ADA Accessibility Pool 10,000,000$ 10,000,000$ 250,000$ 10,250,000$ 64,839,000$
*D 14 AJ NE Inner Loop - Stadium Dr To FM 971 3,660,000$ 1,000,000$ 25,000$ 1,025,000$ 65,864,000$
*D 16 CQ Stadium Dr (CR 151) - Austin Ave To NE Inner Loop 2,860,000$ 1,000,000$ 25,000$ 1,025,000$ 66,889,000$
*C 18 BP Southwestern Blvd - Raintree Dr To SE Inner Loop 2,480,000$ 3,723,000$ 93,075$ $ 4,188,375 $ 71,077,375
*D 21 AT SH 29 (Haven Lane to SH130)12,600,000$ 4,000,000$ 100,000$ 4,100,000$ 75,177,375$
*C 10 BJ2 Leander Rd (RM 2243) - 400ft W of SWBypass to River Ridge Dr 3,100,000$ 4,650,000$ 116,250$ 5,231,250$ 80,408,625$
*C 11 AN DB Wood Dr - SH 29 To Oak Ridge Dr 12,500,000$ 16,320,000$ 408,000$ 18,360,000$ 98,768,625$
*D 19 AZ2 Southwest Bypass- Wolf Ranch Pkwy To SH29 3,130,000$ 500,000$ 12,500$ 512,500$ 99,281,125$
*D
Preliminary Engineering to begin developing Projects from
original Bond List to shovel ready: AC, AO, BU, BG, HH, 5,575,000$ 143,875$ 5,718,875$ 105,000,000$
105,000,000$
12 AC Williams Dr - Rivery Blvd. to Frontage Rd 1,406,300$
13 AO IH 35 SB Frontage Rd - Williams Dr To Rivery Blvd 3,271,875$
15 BU SE Inner Loop - Southwestern Blvd To IH 35 13,150,000$
17 BG SE Inner Loop - SH 29 To Southwestern Blvd 8,690,000$
20 HH Shell Rd - Williams Dr to Shell Spur Rd 14,930,000$
22 TT DB Wood Dr - Oak Ridge Dr To Lake Overlook Dr.13,904,400$
Phase 1 2015 Bond Program Project List Based on February 10 City Council Resolution
* C - Construction D - Design
Committed
Additional Project List to Address Priority Areas
Additional Project List to Address Committee Priorities
DeliveryTimeframe (All)
Row Labels
Pre-
Construction
Austin Avenue Bridges 2,075,840.00$
DB Wood Dr - Oak Ridge Dr To Lake Overlook Dr.3,476,100.00$
DB Wood Dr - SH 29 To Oak Ridge Dr 1,875,000.00$
IH 35 NB Frontage Road - Williams Dr To Lakeway Bridge 25,000.00$
IH 35 SB Frontage Rd - Williams Dr To Rivery Blvd 817,969.00$
Intersection/Capital Pool -$
Leander Rd (RM 2243) - 400ft W of SWBypass to River Ridge Dr 620,000.00$
Leander Rd Bridge @ IH 35 1,600,000.00$
NE Inner Loop - Stadium Dr To FM 971 732,000.00$
Northwest Blvd Bridge - Fontana Dr To Austin Ave -$
Rivery Blvd Extension - Williams Dr To Northwest Blvd 500,000.00$
SE Inner Loop - SH 29 To Southwestern Blvd 1,738,000.00$
SE Inner Loop - Southwestern Blvd To IH 35 2,630,000.00$
SH 29 (Haven Lane to SH130)2,520,000.00$
Shell Rd - Williams Dr to Shell Spur Rd 2,239,500.00$
Sidewalk, Safety and ADA Accessibility Pool -$
Southwest Bypass - Wolf Ranch Pkwy To Leander Rd 250,000.00$
Southwest Bypass- Wolf Ranch Pkwy To SH29 500,000.00$
Southwestern Blvd - Raintree Dr To SE Inner Loop 496,000.00$
Stadium Dr (CR 151) - Austin Ave To NE Inner Loop 572,000.00$
Williams Dr - Rivery Blvd. to Frontage Rd 281,260.00$
Wolf Ranch Pkwy - DB Wood Dr To Southwest Bypass 425,000.00$
(blank)
Grand Total 23,373,669.00$
Row Labels
Pre-
Construction
Austin Avenue Bridges 2,075,840.00$
DB Wood Dr - Oak Ridge Dr To Lake Overlook Dr.3,476,100.00$
DB Wood Dr - SH 29 To Oak Ridge Dr 1,875,000.00$
IH 35 NB Frontage Road - Williams Dr To Lakeway Bridge 25,000.00$
IH 35 SB Frontage Rd - Williams Dr To Rivery Blvd 817,969.00$
Intersection/Capital Pool -$
Leander Rd (RM 2243) - 400ft W of SWBypass to River Ridge Dr 620,000.00$
Leander Rd Bridge @ IH 35 1,600,000.00$
NE Inner Loop - Stadium Dr To FM 971 732,000.00$
Northwest Blvd Bridge - Fontana Dr To Austin Ave -$
Rivery Blvd Extension - Williams Dr To Northwest Blvd 500,000.00$
SE Inner Loop - SH 29 To Southwestern Blvd 1,738,000.00$
SE Inner Loop - Southwestern Blvd To IH 35 2,630,000.00$
SH 29 (Haven Lane to SH130)2,520,000.00$
Shell Rd - Williams Dr to Shell Spur Rd 2,239,500.00$
Sidewalk, Safety and ADA Accessibility Pool -$
Southwest Bypass - Wolf Ranch Pkwy To Leander Rd 250,000.00$
Southwest Bypass- Wolf Ranch Pkwy To SH29 500,000.00$
Southwestern Blvd - Raintree Dr To SE Inner Loop 496,000.00$
Stadium Dr (CR 151) - Austin Ave To NE Inner Loop 572,000.00$
Williams Dr - Rivery Blvd. to Frontage Rd 281,260.00$
Wolf Ranch Pkwy - DB Wood Dr To Southwest Bypass 425,000.00$
(blank)
Grand Total 23,373,669.00$
ROW
Utility
Relocation
Construction
Admin Construction
Preliminary Cost to
Complete
112,000.00$ 423,420.00$ 726,550.00$ 10,379,195.00$ 13,717,005.00$
-$ 25,000.00$ 556,176.00$ 13,904,400.00$ 17,970,000.00$
-$ 1,500,000.00$ 437,500.00$ 12,500,000.00$ 16,320,000.00$
401,000.00$ -$ 405,801.00$ 5,410,678.00$ 6,243,000.00$
-$ 100,000.00$ 245,391.00$ 3,271,875.00$ 4,436,000.00$
-$ -$ -$ 20,000,000.00$ -$
672,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 232,500.00$ 3,100,000.00$ 4,650,000.00$
67,200.00$ -$ 600,000.00$ 8,000,000.00$ 10,270,000.00$
355,188.24$ 100,000.00$ 73,200.00$ 3,660,000.00$ 4,921,000.00$
3,172,880.00$ 500,000.00$ 248,288.00$ 7,093,938.00$ 11,020,000.00$
1,613,920.00$ 1,100,000.00$ 192,500.00$ 5,500,000.00$ 8,907,000.00$
330,000.00$ 75,000.00$ 173,800.00$ 8,690,000.00$ 11,010,000.00$
10,041,276.96$ 100,000.00$ 460,250.00$ 13,150,000.00$ 26,390,000.00$
2,648,745.00$ 100,000.00$ 945,000.00$ 12,600,000.00$ 18,820,000.00$
904,828.32$ 100,000.00$ 298,600.00$ 14,930,000.00$ 18,480,000.00$
-$ -$ -$ 10,000,000.00$ -$
-$ 25,000.00$ 583,275.00$ 16,665,000.00$ 17,530,000.00$
-$ -$ 100,000.00$ 3,130,000.00$ 3,730,000.00$
176,337.00$ 496,000.00$ 74,400.00$ 2,480,000.00$ 3,723,000.00$
469,924.00$ 25,000.00$ 57,200.00$ 2,860,000.00$ 3,985,000.00$
-$ 100,000.00$ 105,473.00$ 1,406,300.00$ 1,894,000.00$
-$ -$ 92,750.00$ 2,650,000.00$ 3,168,000.00$
20,965,299.52$ 4,794,420.00$ 6,608,654.00$ 181,381,386.00$ 207,184,005.00$
ROW
Utility
Relocation
Construction
Admin Construction
Preliminary Cost to
Complete
112,000.00$ 423,420.00$ 726,550.00$ 10,379,195.00$ 13,717,005.00$
-$ 25,000.00$ 556,176.00$ 13,904,400.00$ 17,970,000.00$
-$ 1,500,000.00$ 437,500.00$ 12,500,000.00$ 16,320,000.00$
401,000.00$ -$ 405,801.00$ 5,410,678.00$ 6,243,000.00$
-$ 100,000.00$ 245,391.00$ 3,271,875.00$ 4,436,000.00$
-$ -$ -$ 20,000,000.00$ -$
672,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 232,500.00$ 3,100,000.00$ 4,650,000.00$
67,200.00$ -$ 600,000.00$ 8,000,000.00$ 10,270,000.00$
355,188.24$ 100,000.00$ 73,200.00$ 3,660,000.00$ 4,921,000.00$
3,172,880.00$ 500,000.00$ 248,288.00$ 7,093,938.00$ 11,020,000.00$
1,613,920.00$ 1,100,000.00$ 192,500.00$ 5,500,000.00$ 8,907,000.00$
330,000.00$ 75,000.00$ 173,800.00$ 8,690,000.00$ 11,010,000.00$
10,041,276.96$ 100,000.00$ 460,250.00$ 13,150,000.00$ 26,390,000.00$
2,648,745.00$ 100,000.00$ 945,000.00$ 12,600,000.00$ 18,820,000.00$
904,828.32$ 100,000.00$ 298,600.00$ 14,930,000.00$ 18,480,000.00$
-$ -$ -$ 10,000,000.00$ -$
-$ 25,000.00$ 583,275.00$ 16,665,000.00$ 17,530,000.00$
-$ -$ 100,000.00$ 3,130,000.00$ 3,730,000.00$
176,337.00$ 496,000.00$ 74,400.00$ 2,480,000.00$ 3,723,000.00$
469,924.00$ 25,000.00$ 57,200.00$ 2,860,000.00$ 3,985,000.00$
-$ 100,000.00$ 105,473.00$ 1,406,300.00$ 1,894,000.00$
-$ -$ 92,750.00$ 2,650,000.00$ 3,168,000.00$
20,965,299.52$ 4,794,420.00$ 6,608,654.00$ 181,381,386.00$ 207,184,005.00$
Potential Outside
Funding Net Cost
4,260,000.00$ 9,457,005.00$
17,970,000.00$
-$ 16,320,000.00$
-$ 6,243,000.00$
186,929.00$ 4,249,071.00$
-$ 10,000,000.00$
4,650,000.00$
6,270,000.00$ 4,000,000.00$
-$ 4,921,000.00$
-$ 11,020,000.00$
3,000,000.00$ 5,907,000.00$
11,010,000.00$
-$ 26,390,000.00$
14,820,000.00$ 4,000,000.00$
-$ 18,480,000.00$
-$ 10,000,000.00$
4,000,000.00$ 13,530,000.00$
-$ 3,730,000.00$
-$ 3,723,000.00$
-$ 3,985,000.00$
-$ 1,894,000.00$
-$ 3,168,000.00$
32,536,929.00$ 194,647,076.00$
Potential Outside
Funding Net Cost
4,260,000.00$ 9,457,005.00$
17,970,000.00$
-$ 16,320,000.00$
-$ 6,243,000.00$
186,929.00$ 4,249,071.00$
-$ 10,000,000.00$
4,650,000.00$
6,270,000.00$ 4,000,000.00$
$-
$10,000,000.00
$20,000,000.00
$30,000,000.00
$40,000,000.00
$50,000,000.00
$60,000,000.00
$70,000,000.00
$80,000,000.00
$90,000,000.00
-$ 4,921,000.00$
-$ 11,020,000.00$
3,000,000.00$ 5,907,000.00$
11,010,000.00$
-$ 26,390,000.00$
14,820,000.00$ 4,000,000.00$
-$ 18,480,000.00$
-$ 10,000,000.00$
4,000,000.00$ 13,530,000.00$
-$ 3,730,000.00$
-$ 3,723,000.00$
-$ 3,985,000.00$
-$ 1,894,000.00$
-$ 3,168,000.00$
32,536,929.00$ 194,647,076.00$
Net Cost
Potential Outside Funding
Preliminary Cost to Complete
Construction
Construction Admin
Utility Relocation
ROW
Pre-Construction
New
Order OTP GTAB
Roadway
Project Commitment
Functional
Classification
No. of
Lanes
Project
Length
(ft)
Project
Length
(Mi)
ROW
Needed
(ft)
ROW
Needed
(acres)
ROW Est.
$/sq ft Cost/Acre
Delivery
Timeframe Construction
Pre-
Construction Utility Relocation
Construction
Admin ROW Extension
Initial Proposed
Bond Cost
Preliminary
Cost to
Complete
Potential
Outside
Funding
Net Cost
to Complete
(Bond Package)
Cummulative
Total Partner Match
1 CT - Austin Avenue Bridges
High Minor Arterial 5 1,771 0.34 TBD TBD 7.00$ 304,920$ Short 10,379,195$ 2,075,840$ 423,420$ 726,550$ 112,000$ 13,717,005$ 13,717,005$ 4,260,000$ 9,457,005$ $ 9,457,005 CAMPO 60%
2 AE 28 Northwest Blvd Bridge - Fontana Dr To Austin Ave High Commitment Major Arterial 5 2,333 0.44 136 7.28 10.00$ 435,600$ Short 7,093,938$ -$ 500,000$ 248,288$ 3,172,880$ 11,015,106$ 11,020,000$ 11,020,000$ -$ 11,020,000$ #VALUE!
3 AD 25 Rivery Blvd Extension - Williams Dr To Northwest Blvd High Commitment Collector 4 2,620 0.50 112 6.74 5.50$ 239,580$ Short 5,500,000$ 500,000$ 1,100,000$ 192,500$ 1,613,920$ 8,906,420$ 8,907,000$ 8,907,000$ 3,000,000$ 5,907,000$ #VALUE!
4 AF 24 IH 35 NB Frontage Road - Williams Dr To Lakeway Bridge High Commitment Frontage 2 10,025 1.90 4 0.92 10.00$ 435,600$ Short 5,410,678$ 25,000$ -$ 405,801$ 401,000$ 6,242,479$ 6,243,000$ 6,243,000$ -$ 6,243,000$ #VALUE! TxDOT 0%
5 AZ1 27 Southwest Bypass - Wolf Ranch Pkwy To Leander Rd Medium Commitment Freeway 6 7,026 1.33 200 32.26 Existing Existing
Medium 16,665,000$ 250,000$ 25,000$ 583,275$ Existing 17,523,275$ 17,530,000$ 17,530,000$ 4,000,000$ 13,530,000$ #VALUE!
6 BC 14 Wolf Ranch Pkwy - DB Wood Dr To Southwest Bypass Medium Commitment Minor Arterial 5 5,561 1.05 112 14.30 Existing Existing
Medium 2,650,000$ 425,000$ -$ 92,750$ Existing 3,167,750$ 3,168,000$ 3,168,000$ -$ 3,168,000$ #VALUE! TxDOT 0%
7 -39 Intersection/Capital Pool High - NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Short 20,000,000$ NA NA NA NA NA NA NA -$ 10,000,000$ #VALUE!
8 CS CS Leander Rd Bridge @ IH 35 High - NA 560 0.27 20 0.26 6.00$ 261,360$ Short 8,000,000$ 1,600,000$ -$ 600,000$ 67,200$ 10,267,200$ 10,270,000$ 10,270,000$ 6,270,000$ 4,000,000$ #VALUE!TxDOT 40%
9 -Sidewalk, Safety and ADA Accessibility Pool High - NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Short 10,000,000$ NA NA NA NA NA NA NA -$ 10,000,000$ #VALUE!
10 BJ2 Leander Rd (RM 2243) - 400ft W of SWBypass to River Ridge DrMedium Major Arterial 5 2,800 0.53 120 7.71 2.00$ 87,120.00$ Medium 3,100,000$ 620,000$ 25,000$ 232,500$ 672,000$ 4,649,500$ 4,650,000$ 4,650,000$ 4,650,000$ #VALUE! TxDOT 0%
11 AN 16 DB Wood Dr - SH 29 To Oak Ridge Dr Medium Minor Arterial 5 7,699 1.46 0 0.00 Existing Existing
Medium 12,500,000$ 1,875,000$ 1,500,000$ 437,500$ Existing 16,312,500$ 16,320,000$ 16,320,000$ -$ 16,320,000$ #VALUE!
12 AC 15 Williams Dr - Rivery Blvd. to Frontage Rd Medium Major Arterial 5 2,009 0.38 0 0.00 9.00$ 392,040$ Medium 1,406,300$ 281,260$ 100,000$ 105,473$ Existing 1,893,033$ 1,894,000$ 1,894,000$ -$ 1,894,000$ #VALUE!
13 AO 22 IH 35 SB Frontage Rd - Williams Dr To Rivery Blvd Long Term Frontage 2 2,862 0.54 0 0.00 10.00$ 435,600$ Long 3,271,875$ 817,969$ 100,000$ 245,391$ Existing 4,435,235$ 4,436,000$ 4,436,000$ 186,929$ 4,249,071$ #VALUE!
14 AJ 10 NE Inner Loop - Stadium Dr To FM 971 High Major Arterial 5 3,302 0.63 varies 2.72 3.00$ 130,680$ Short 3,660,000$ 732,000$ 100,000$ 73,200$ 355,188$ 4,920,388$ 4,921,000$ 4,921,000$ -$ 4,921,000$ #VALUE!
15 BU 21 SE Inner Loop - Southwestern Blvd To IH 35 Medium Freeway 6 13,052 2.47 0 57.63 4.00$ 174,240$ Medium 13,150,000$ 2,630,000$ 100,000$ 460,250$ 10,041,277$ 26,381,527$ 26,390,000$ 26,390,000$ -$ 26,390,000$ #VALUE!
16 CQ 11 Stadium Dr (CR 151) - Austin Ave To NE Inner Loop Medium Minor Arterial 5 2,582 0.49 52 3.08 3.50$ 152,460$ Medium 2,860,000$ 572,000$ 25,000$ 57,200$ 469,924$ 3,984,124$ 3,985,000$ 3,985,000$ -$ 3,985,000$ #VALUE!
17 BG 20 SE Inner Loop - SH 29 To Southwestern Blvd High Bond Minor Arterial 5 7,839 1.48 55 1.89 4 174240 Short 8,690,000$ 1,738,000$ 75,000$ 173,800$ 330,000$ 11,006,800$ 11,010,000$ 11,010,000$ 11,010,000$ #VALUE!
18 BP 13 Southwestern Blvd - Raintree Dr To SE Inner Loop Medium Collector 4 2,799 0.53 18 1.16 3.50$ 152,460$ Medium 2,480,000$ 496,000$ 496,000$ 74,400$ 176,337$ 3,722,737$ 3,723,000$ 3,723,000$ -$ 3,723,000$ #VALUE!
19 AZ2 - Southwest Bypass- Wolf Ranch Pkwy To SH29 Freeway 6 2,825 0.54 200 12.97 Existing Existing
Medium 3,130,000$ 500,000$ -$ 100,000$ Existing 3,730,000$ 3,730,000$ 3,730,000$ -$ 3,730,000$ #VALUE!
20 HH 23 Shell Rd - Williams Dr to Shell Spur Rd Long Term Major Arterial 5 12,936 2.45 varies 3.46 6 261360 Long 14,930,000$ 2,239,500$ 100,000$ 298,600$ 904,828$ 18,472,928$ 18,480,000$ 18,480,000$ -$ 18,480,000$ #VALUE!
21 AT 41 SH 29 (Haven Lane to SH130)Medium Major Arterial 5 10,702 2.03 45 11.06 5.50$ 239,580$ Medium 12,600,000$ 2,520,000$ 100,000$ 945,000$ 2,648,745$ 18,813,745$ 18,820,000$ 18,820,000$ 14,820,000$ 4,000,000$ #VALUE!TxDOT 20%
22 TT 17 DB Wood Dr - Oak Ridge Dr To Lake Overlook Dr. Long Term Major Arterial 5 9,300 1.76 0 0.00 4 174240 Long 13,904,400$ 3,476,100$ 25,000$ 556,176$ Existing 17,961,676$ 17,970,000$ 17,970,000$ 17,970,000$ #VALUE!
-$
181,381,386$ 194,647,076$
1 BZ 32 Rabbit Hill Rd - Blue Springs Blvd To Westinghouse Rd Long Term Collector 5 7,831 1.48 32 5.75 5.50$ 239,580$ Long 8,680,000$ 1,736,000$ 100,000$ 260,400$ 1,378,256$ 12,154,656$ 12,160,000$ 12,160,000$ 12,160,000$ 12,160,000$
2 QQ 19 Airport Rd - Lakeway Dr To Berry Creek Dr Medium Minor Arterial 5 11,691 2.21 57 15.30 5.00$ 217,800$ Medium 12,950,000$ 2,590,000$ 100,000$ 388,500$ 3,331,935$ 19,360,435$ 19,370,000$ 19,370,000$ -$ 19,370,000$ 31,530,000$
3 BJ1 30 Leander Rd (RM 2243) - Gary Park To 400' West of SW BypassMedium Major Arterial 5 24,881 4.71 120 68.54 2.00$ 87,120$ Medium 27,570,000$ 5,514,000$ 25,000$ 2,067,750$ 5,971,440$ 41,148,190$ 41,150,000$ 41,150,000$ 41,150,000$ 72,680,000$ TxDOT
4 AF2 24b IH 35 NB Frontage Road - Lakeway Bridge To SH 130 Long Term Frontage 2 4,661 0.88 7 0.75 8.00$ 348,480$ Long 2,070,000$ 414,000$ 25,000$ 155,250$ 261,016$ 2,925,266$ 2,926,000$ 2,926,000$ 2,926,000$ 75,606,000$ TxDOT
5 BV 35 Southwestern Blvd - Sam Houston Ave To Westinghouse RdLong Term Major Arterial 5 6,456 1.22 67 9.93 2.50$ 108,900$ Long 7,150,000$ 1,430,000$ 100,000$ 143,000$ 1,081,380$ 9,904,380$ 9,905,000$ 9,905,000$ -$ 9,905,000$ 85,511,000$
6 CP 33 Rockride Ln - SE Inner Loop To Southwestern Blvd Medium Collector 4 8,350 1.58 24 5.04 2.50$ 108,900$ Medium 7,400,000$ 1,480,000$ 25,000$ 222,000$ 548,875$ 9,675,875$ 9,676,000$ 9,676,000$ 9,676,000$ 95,187,000$
7 XX 18 Airport Rd - IH 35 To Lakeway Dr Long Term Minor Arterial 5 3,073 0.58 57 4.02 5.00$ 217,800$ Long 3,400,000$ 680,000$ 700,000$ 102,000$ 875,805$ 5,757,805$ 5,758,000$ 5,758,000$ 5,758,000$ 100,945,000$
8 JJ 23b Shell Rd - Shell Spur To SH 195 Long Term Major Arterial 5 8,448 1.60 54 10.47 5 217800 Long 13,528,000$ 2,705,600$ -$ 473,480$ 2,280,960$ 18,988,040$ 18,990,000$ 18,990,000$ 18,990,000$ 119,935,000$
9 CR 12 CR 152 - Stadium Dr (CR 151) To City Limits Long Term Collector 4 4,050 0.77 15 1.39 5.00$ 217,800$ Long 5,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 25,000$ 150,000$ 303,750$ 6,478,750$ 6,479,000$ 6,479,000$ 6,479,000$ 126,414,000$
10 CN 34 Southwestern Blvd - Westinghouse Rd To ETJ Long Term Major Arterial 5 2,885 0.55 0 0.00 2.50$ 108,900$ Long 3,200,000$ 640,000$ 200,000$ 96,000$ Existing 4,136,000$ 4,136,000$ 4,136,000$ 4,136,000$ 4,136,000$ 130,550,000$
82,268,000$ 325,197,076$
1 CK 31 Mays - Teravista Pkwy To Westinghouse Rd High Minor Arterial 5 8,829 1.67 40 8.11 10.00$ 435,600$ Short 9,020,000$ 1,804,000$ 25,000$ 270,600$ 3,531,600$ 14,651,200$ 14,660,000$ 14,660,000$ 14,660,000$ 145,210,000$ TIRZ
2 CJ 38 Westinghouse Rd - IH 35 To FM 1460 Long Term Major Arterial 6 11,314 2.14 0 0.00 8.00$ 348,480$ Long 15,040,000$ 3,008,000$ 50,000$ 451,200$ Existing 18,549,200$ 18,550,000$ 18,550,000$ 18,550,000$ 163,760,000$ TIRZ
3 CL 36 Westinghouse Rd - FM 1460 To Southwestern Blvd Medium Bond Major Arterial 5 9,649 1.83 67 14.84 2.50$ 108,900$ Medium 10,690,000$ 2,138,000$ 1,069,000$ 320,700$ 1,616,208$ 15,833,908$ 15,840,000$ 15,840,000$ 15,840,000$ 179,600,000$ WilCo
4 BK 26 Southwest Bypass - Leander Rd To I 35 Medium Bond Freeway 2 9,335 1.77 0 0 0 Medium 16,200,000$ -$ 25,000$ 50,000$ Existing 16,275,000$ 16,280,000$ 16,280,000$ 16,200,000$ 80,000$ 179,680,000$ WilCo
5 CM 37 Westinghouse Rd - Southwestern Blvd To SH 130 Long Term Bond Major Arterial 5 12,113 2.29 136 37.82 2.50$ 108,900$ Long 13,420,000$ 2,684,000$ 50,000$ 402,600$ 4,118,420$ 20,675,020$ 20,680,000$ 20,680,000$ 20,680,000$ 200,360,000$ WilCo
$64,370,000 $395,007,076
New
Order OTP Roadway
Project Commitment Functional
Classification
No. of
Lanes
Project
Length
(ft)
Project
Length
(Mi)
ROW
Needed
(ft)
ROW
Needed
(acres)
ROW Est.
$/sq ft
Cost/Acre Delivery
Timeframe Construction Pre-
Construction Utility Relocation Construction
Admin ROW Extension
Initial Proposed
Bond Cost
Preliminary
Cost to
Complete
Potential
Outside
Funding
Project Costs Contigency Issuance
Net Cost
to Complete Cumulative Partner Match
1 CT Austin Avenue Bridges High Minor Arterial 5 1,771 0.34 TBD TBD 7.00$ 304,920$ Short 10,379,195$ 2,075,840$ 423,420$ 726,550$ 112,000$ 13,717,005$ 13,717,005$ 1,000,000$ 12,717,005$ 1,271,701$ 317,925$ $ 14,306,631 $ 14,306,631 CAMPO 60%
2 AE Northwest Blvd Bridge - Fontana Dr To Austin Ave High Commitment Major Arterial 5 2,333 0.44 136 7.28 10.00$ 435,600$ Short 7,093,938$ -$ 500,000$ 248,288$ 3,172,880$ 11,015,106$ 11,020,000$ 11,020,000$ -$ 11,020,000$ 1,102,000$ 275,500$ $ 12,397,500 $ 26,704,131
3 AD Rivery Blvd Extension - Williams Dr To Northwest Blvd High Commitment Collector 4 2,620 0.50 112 6.74 5.50$ 239,580$ Short 5,500,000$ 500,000$ 1,100,000$ 192,500$ 1,613,920$ 8,906,420$ 8,907,000$ 8,907,000$ 3,000,000$ 5,907,000$ 590,700$ 147,675$ $ 6,645,375 $ 33,349,506
4 AF IH 35 NB Frontage Road - Williams Dr To Lakeway Bridge High Commitment Frontage 2 10,025 1.90 4 0.92 10.00$ 435,600$ Short 5,410,678$ 25,000$ -$ 405,801$ 401,000$ 6,242,479$ 6,243,000$ 6,243,000$ -$ 6,243,000$ 624,300$ 156,075$ $ 7,023,375 $ 40,372,881 TxDOT 0%
5 AZ1 Southwest Bypass - Wolf Ranch Pkwy To Leander Rd Medium Commitment Freeway 6 7,026 1.33 200 32.26 Existing Existing Medium 16,665,000$ 250,000$ 25,000$ 583,275$ -$ 17,523,275$ 17,530,000$ 17,530,000$ 4,000,000$ 13,530,000$ 1,353,000$ 338,250$ $ 15,221,250 $ 55,594,131 TxDOT -$
6 BC Wolf Ranch Pkwy - DB Wood Dr To Southwest Bypass Medium Commitment Minor Arterial 5 5,561 1.05 112 14.30 Existing Existing
Medium 2,650,000$ 425,000$ -$ 92,750$ -$ 3,167,750$ 3,168,000$ 3,168,000$ -$ 3,168,000$ 316,800$ 79,200$ $ 3,564,000 $ 59,158,131
7 -Intersection/Capital Pool High - NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Short 20,000,000$ NA NA NA -$ NA NA NA -$ 10,000,000$ -$ 250,000$ $ 10,250,000 $ 69,408,131
8 CS Leander Rd Bridge @ IH 35 High - NA 560 0.27 20 0.26 6.00$ 261,360$ Short 8,000,000$ 1,600,000$ -$ 600,000$ 67,200$ 10,267,200$ 10,270,000$ 10,270,000$ 6,270,000$ 4,000,000$ 400,000$ 100,000$ $ 4,500,000 $ 73,908,131 TxDOT 0%
9 -Sidewalk, Safety and ADA Accessibility Pool High - NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Medium 10,000,000$ NA NA NA -$ NA NA NA -$ 10,000,000$ -$ 250,000$ $ 10,250,000 $ 84,158,131
10 BJ2 Leander Rd (RM 2243) - 400ft W of SWBypass to River Ridge DrMedium Major Arterial 5 2,800 0.53 120 7.71 2.00$ 87,120.00$ Medium 3,100,000$ 620,000$ 25,000$ 232,500$ 672,000$ 4,649,500$ 4,650,000$ 4,650,000$ 4,650,000$ 465,000$ 116,250$ $ 5,231,250 $ 89,389,381
11 AN DB Wood Dr - SH 29 To Oak Ridge Dr Medium Minor Arterial 5 7,699 1.46 0 0.00 Existing Existing Medium 12,500,000$ 1,875,000$ 1,500,000$ 437,500$ -$ 16,312,500$ 16,320,000$ 16,320,000$ -$ 16,320,000$ 1,632,000$ 408,000$ $ 18,360,000 $ 107,749,381
12 AC Williams Dr - Rivery Blvd. to Frontage Rd Medium Major Arterial 5 2,009 0.38 0 0.00 9.00$ 392,040$ Medium 1,406,300$ 281,260$ 100,000$ 105,473$ -$ 1,893,033$ 1,894,000$ 1,894,000$ -$ 1,894,000$ 189,400$ 47,350$ $ 2,130,750 $ 109,880,131
13 AO IH 35 SB Frontage Rd - Williams Dr To Rivery Blvd Long Term Frontage 2 2,862 0.54 0 0.00 10.00$ 435,600$ Long 3,271,875$ 817,969$ 100,000$ 245,391$ -$ 4,435,235$ 4,436,000$ 4,436,000$ 186,929$ 4,249,071$ 424,907$ 106,227$ $ 4,780,205 $ 114,660,336
14 AJ NE Inner Loop - Stadium Dr To FM 971 High Major Arterial 5 3,302 0.63 varies 2.72 3.00$ 130,680$ Short 3,660,000$ 732,000$ 100,000$ 73,200$ 355,188$ 4,920,388$ 4,921,000$ 4,921,000$ -$ 4,921,000$ 492,100$ 123,025$ $ 5,536,125 $ 120,196,461 TxDOT 0$
15 BU SE Inner Loop - Southwestern Blvd To IH 35 Medium Freeway 6 13,052 2.47 0 57.63 4.00$ 174,240$ Medium 13,150,000$ 2,630,000$ 100,000$ 460,250$ 10,041,277$ 26,381,527$ 26,390,000$ 26,390,000$ -$ 26,390,000$ 2,639,000$ 659,750$ $ 29,688,750 $ 149,885,211
16 CQ Stadium Dr (CR 151) - Austin Ave To NE Inner Loop Medium Minor Arterial 5 2,582 0.49 52 3.08 3.50$ 152,460$ Medium 2,860,000$ 572,000$ 25,000$ 57,200$ 469,924$ 3,984,124$ 3,985,000$ 3,985,000$ -$ 3,985,000$ 398,500$ 99,625$ $ 4,483,125 $ 154,368,336
17 BG SE Inner Loop - SH 29 To Southwestern Blvd High Bond Minor Arterial 5 7,839 1.48 55 1.89 4 174240 Short 8,690,000$ 1,738,000$ 75,000$ 173,800$ 330,000$ 11,006,800$ 11,010,000$ 11,010,000$ 11,010,000$ 1,101,000$ 275,250$ $ 12,386,250 $ 166,754,586
18 BP Southwestern Blvd - Raintree Dr To SE Inner Loop Medium Collector 4 2,799 0.53 18 1.16 3.50$ 152,460$ Medium 2,480,000$ 496,000$ 496,000$ 74,400$ 176,337$ 3,722,737$ 3,723,000$ 3,723,000$ -$ 3,723,000$ 372,300$ 93,075$ $ 4,188,375 $ 170,942,961
19 AZ2 Southwest Bypass- Wolf Ranch Pkwy To SH29 Freeway 6 2,825 0.54 200 12.97 Existing Existing Medium 3,130,000$ 500,000$ -$ 100,000$ -$ 3,730,000$ 3,730,000$ 3,730,000$ -$ 3,730,000$ 373,000$ 93,250$ $ 4,196,250 $ 175,139,211
20 HH Shell Rd - Williams Dr to Shell Spur Rd Long Term Major Arterial 5 12,936 2.45 varies 3.46 6 261360 Long 14,930,000$ 2,239,500$ 100,000$ 298,600$ 904,828$ 18,472,928$ 18,480,000$ 18,480,000$ -$ 18,480,000$ 1,848,000$ 462,000$ $ 20,790,000 $ 195,929,211 TxDOT 0$
21 AT SH 29 (Haven Lane to SH130)Medium Major Arterial 5 10,702 2.03 45 11.06 5.50$ 239,580$ Medium 12,600,000$ 2,520,000$ 100,000$ 945,000$ 2,648,745$ 18,813,745$ 18,820,000$ 18,820,000$ 14,820,000$ 4,000,000$ 400,000$ 100,000$ $ 4,500,000 $ 200,429,211
22 TT DB Wood Dr - Oak Ridge Dr To Lake Overlook Dr. Long Term Major Arterial 5 9,300 1.76 0 0.00 4 174240 Long 13,904,400$ 3,476,100$ 25,000$ 556,176$ -$ 17,961,676$ 17,970,000$ 17,970,000$ 17,970,000$ 1,797,000$ 449,250$ $ 20,216,250 $ 220,645,461
181,381,386$ 197,907,076$
Southwest Bypass- Wolf Rancj
Rivery Blvd Construction Time Calc Modified Const Time Preconstruction Time CalcModified Precon Time ROW ROW time after PreCon
Northwest Blvd Bridge Assume $400,000/month Assume $50,000/month Begins 1/2 thru design
Austin Avenue Bridges 26 18 42 18 6 0
Northwest Blvd Bridge - Fontana Dr To Austin Ave 18 18 0 18 18 9
Rivery Blvd Extension - Williams Dr To Northwest Blvd 14 12 10 10 18 13
IH 35 NB Frontage Road - Williams Dr To Lakeway Bridge 14 12 1 18 6 0
Southwest Bypass - Wolf Ranch Pkwy To Leander Rd 42 5 0 0
Wolf Ranch Pkwy - DB Wood Dr To Southwest Bypass 7 20 9 18 0 0
Intersection/Capital Pool 50 12 #VALUE!12 0 0
Leander Rd Bridge @ IH 35 20 22 32 12 6 0
Sidewalk, Safety and ADA Accessibility Pool 25 #VALUE!0 0
Leander Rd (RM 2243) - 400ft W of SWBypass to River Ridge Dr 8 24 12 6 12 9
DB Wood Dr - SH 29 To Oak Ridge Dr 31 9 38 6 0 0
Williams Dr - Rivery Blvd. to Frontage Rd 4 8 6 9 0 0
IH 35 SB Frontage Rd - Williams Dr To Rivery Blvd 8 30 16 16 0 0
NE Inner Loop - Stadium Dr To FM 971 9 6 15 6 6 3