Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda_GTEC_07.20.2016Notice of Meeting for the Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corp and the Gov erning Body of the City of Georgetown July 20, 2016 at 3:30 PM at the GMC Building - 300-1 Industrial Av e., Georgetown, TX 78626 The City o f G eo rgeto wn is committed to comp lianc e with the Americans with Dis abilities Ac t (ADA). If yo u req uire as s is tanc e in participating at a p ublic meeting d ue to a disability, as d efined und er the ADA, reas onab le as s is tance, ad ap tatio ns , or acc o mmo d ations will b e provid ed up o n req uest. P leas e c o ntact the City Sec retary's Office, at leas t three (3) days prior to the sc hed uled meeting d ate, at (512) 930-3652 o r City Hall at 113 Eas t 8th Street fo r add itional info rmation; TTY us ers ro ute through Relay Texas at 711. Regular Session (This Regular S es s io n may, at any time, b e rec es s ed to convene an Exec utive S es s io n fo r any p urpose authorized b y the Op en Meetings Act, Texas Go vernment Co d e 551.) A Call to Ord er The Board may, at any time, rec es s the R egular S es s io n to convene in Exec utive S es s io n at the reques t of the Chair, a Board Memb er, the City Manager, As s is tant City Manager, G eneral Manager of Utilities, City Co uncil Member, o r legal c o uns el for any p urpos e authorized b y the Op en Meetings Act, Texas Government C o d e Chapter 551, and are s ubjec t to actio n in the Regular Ses s ion that follows . B Introduction of Vis tors C Ind ustry/C AMP O/TXDOT Updates D Dis cus s ion regard ing the Projec t Progres s Reports and Time Lines. – Bill Dryd en, P.E., Transportation Engineer, and Ed ward G. Polasek, AICP, Trans portation S ervic es Direc tor. E Pres entatio n o f Georgetown Trans p o rtation Enhanc ement Co rp o ration mo nthly financ ial reports for June 2016. Leigh Wallace, F inance Direc tor, C OG, Financ e Manager, GTEC. Legislativ e Regular Agenda F Co nsideration and possible actio n to approve minutes from the regular GTEC Bo ard meeting held June 15, 2016. David Mo rgan, City Manager - C OG, General Manager - GT EC G Co nsideration and p o s s ib le actio n to ap p ro ve Tas k Order MS E-16-001 with M&S Engineering, LLC, of Georgetown, Texas , fo r p ro fes s io nal engineering s ervices related to the final engineering design for c o nstruc tio n plans , spec ificatio ns and estimate for the Rivery Boulevard T IA Imp ro vements in the amo unt of $$239,800.00. – Bill Dryden, P.E., Trans p o rtatio n Engineer and Ed ward G. Polas ek, AICP, Transportatio n Services Direc tor. H Co nsideration and p o s s ib le ac tion to approve Tas k Order CP Y-16-001 with CP&Y, Inc., o f Aus tin, Texas, for profes s ional engineering servic es related to the final engineering des ign for c o nstruc tion plans , spec ifications and estimate fo r the R ab b it Hill Road Imp rovements P ro ject from Wes tinghous e Ro ad to no rth of S. Clearview Drive in the amo unt o f $ $425,700.00. – Bill Dryd en, P.E., Transportation Engineer and Ed ward G. P o las ek, AICP, Transportatio n Services Direc tor. I Co nsideration and possible actio n to approve a Cons tructio n Contrac t with C .C . Carlto n Indus tries, LTD, Page 1 of 104 of Austin, T X, for the Mays S treet Extens io n Projec t fro m Bass Pro Drive/Teravis ta Bo ulevard to Westingho us e Road in the amount of $ $6,375,088.88. – Bill Dryd en, P.E., Trans p o rtatio n Engineer, and Ed ward G. P o las ek, AICP, Transportatio n Services Direc tor. J Co nsideration and possible actio n award ing a tas k order to Terrac o n Co ns ultants , Inc., o f Aus tin, Texas for cons truc tion materials tes ting and o bs ervation for the Mays Street Extens io n in the amount of $63,320.00 -- Wes ley Wright, P.E., Sys tems Engineering Direc tor CERTIFICATE OF POSTING I, Shelley No wling, C ity S ecretary fo r the C ity of Geo rgeto wn, Texas , d o hereby c ertify that this Notice of Meeting was p o s ted at City Hall, 113 E. 8th Street, a p lace read ily acc es s ible to the general p ublic at all times , on the ______ d ay o f __________________, 2016, at __________, and remained so p o s ted fo r at leas t 72 c o ntinuo us ho urs p receding the sc heduled time o f s aid meeting. ____________________________________ S helley No wling, City Sec retary Page 2 of 104 City of Georgetown, Texas Transportation Enhancement Corp July 20, 2016 SUBJECT: Disc ussion regarding the P ro ject P ro gress R ep o rts and Time Lines . – Bill Dryden, P.E., Trans p o rtatio n Engineer, and Edward G. P o las ek, AICP, Trans p o rtatio n Services Direc tor. ITEM SUMMARY: GTEC P ro jec ts FM 1460 ROW & Utility Relo cations – Projec t No. 5RB Mays S treet Extension (Teravista Parkway to Westinghous e Ro ad) – P ro ject No . 5RI NB F ro ntage Road (SS 158 to Lakeway Dr.) – Projec t No. 5QY Northwes t Blvd Overp as s – Projec t No . 5QX Rivery Boulevard Extens io n (Williams to No rthwest Blvd ) – Projec t 5RM Snead Drive – Projec t 5QZ GTEC Projec t Update & Status Rep o rt GTAB Projec ts Aus tin Avenue Bridges P ro ject CDBG Sidewalk Imp ro vements - MLK/3rd St (Scenic Dr. to Aus tin Ave.) - University Ave. (I 35 to Hart St.) FM 971 R ealignment at Aus tin Avenue FM 1460 Imp ro vements Projec t Jim Ho gg Drive/Road at Williams Drive Southwes t Bypass Projec t (Leander Road to I 35) Trans it Development Plan Trans portation S ervic es Operatio ns – CIP Maintenance 2015 Ro ad Bond P ro gram Southwes t Bypass (Leand er Dr./RM 2243 to Wolf Ranch Parkway Extens ion) and Wolf Ranch Parkway Extens io n (SW Bypass to DB Wood Rd.) FINANCIAL IMPACT: None SUBMITTED BY: Bill Dryden, P.E.; Trans portation Engineer ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Page 3 of 104 July 2016 - Project Progres s Reports Backup Material GTEC - Project Status - 2016-07 Backup Material July 2016 - GTAB Project Progres s Reports Backup Material 2015 Road Bond Program Projects Progress Reports Backup Material Page 4 of 104 FM 1460  (Quail Valley Drive to University Drive)  Project No. 5RB     TIP No. BO & CD  Rights‐of‐Way Acquisition and Utility Relocation  July 2016  Unchanged  Project Description Acquisition of ROW and relocation of utilities for the FM 1460 Project (Quail Valley  Drive to University Drive).  Purpose To have all ROWs cleared and utilities prior to TxDOT letting the project for  construction.  Project Managers Ed Polasek, AICP, and Bill Dryden, P.E.  Engineer Brown and Gay Engineers, Inc.      Element Status / Issues  Design Complete  Environmental/  Archeological  Complete  Rights of Way    One (1) remaining parcel – pending closing  documents.  Section:  North South  Acquired:  35 8  Pending:  1 ‐  Condemnation:  0 ‐  Total:  36 8  Utility Relocations Ongoing   Two Utility companies have submitted invoices for reimbursement – Atmos Energy  and Seminole Pipeline  Construction Under Construction.  Tentatively scheduled to be complete Spring 2018.  Other Issues Engineer preparing Change Orders for construction contract.    Page 5 of 104 Mays Street Extension  (Teravista Parkway in Round Rock to the intersection with Westinghouse Road)  Project No. 5RI     TIP No. CK  July 2016  Project Description Extend Mays Street northward from Teravista Parkway to the existing intersection  with Westinghouse Road at Rabbit Hill Road. The widening along Westinghouse  Road and Rabbit Hill Road will also be included in the schematic for additional  turning lanes to/from Westinghouse Road. Preliminary layouts for future signals  and roadway illumination will also be included.  The project length along the  anticipated alignment is approximately 1.2 miles.  Purpose To develop final PS&E and complete construction of the project.  Project Managers Bill Dryden, P.E.  Engineer CP&Y, Inc.    Element Status / Issues  Design Complete  Environmental/  Archeological  Complete  Rights of Way ROW acquisition – on‐going Total Parcels: 6  Acquired: 4  Pending: 2  Utility Relocations TBD  Construction Project advertised June 12th and 19th;   Bids to be opened June 30th;  GTEC – July 20th;  Council – August 9th;  Anticipated NTP – Late‐August  Anticipated completion Summer 2017  Other Issues     Page 6 of 104 NB Frontage Road  (SS 158 to Lakeway Drive)  Project No. 5QX      TIP No. AF  July 2016  Unchanged  Project Description Design and construct a portion of an IH‐35 NB Frontage Road from Williams Drive  to Northwest Boulevard Bridge of a proposed NB FR which would ultimately  extend to Lakeway Drive.  Purpose To relieve congestion in the Williams Drive/Austin Avenue intersection by  providing a NB alternate, interim route to FM 971 and Georgetown High School.  This project is the only remaining portion of IH 35 in Central Texas without a  frontage road existing, under construction or being designed.  Project Manager Bill Dryden  Engineer Klotz Associates  Element Status / Issues  Design We have been informed by TxDOT that it will be doing the Schematic,  Environmental, etc., and PS&E for the NB Frontage Road as part of its proposed  Williams Drive Bridge project.  The City project is on indefinite hold but we will continue coordination with  TxDOT on its design of the project.  Environmental/  Archeology  TBD – By TxDOT  Rights of Way None identified  Utility Relocations TBD  Construction TBD  Other Issues None at this time.    Page 7 of 104 Northwest Boulevard Overpass  (Fontana Drive to Austin Avenue)  Project No. 5QX     TIP No. AF  July 2016  Unchanged  Project Description Construction of overpass and surface roads to connect Northwest Boulevard with  Austin Avenue and FM 971.  Purpose This project will relieve congestion at the Austin Avenue/Williams Drive  intersection and provide a more direct access from the west side of IH 35 corridor to  Georgetown High School and SH 130 via FM 971.  Project Manager Bill Dryden, P.E.  Engineer Klotz Associates    Element Status / Issues  Design Engineer is coordinating design with the design for Rivery Boulevard in moving  towards construction PS&E for both projects to minimize overlap work between  these two projects.  Engineer has developed alternatives for stormwater outfall northward from NW  Blvd.  Environmental/  Archeological  Concurrent with preliminary engineering and schematic design.  Rights of Way ROW Documents are being finalized.  Part of the ROW for this project is being  required to complete the Rivery Boulevard Extension project.  Utility Relocations TBD  Construction Tentatively scheduled to begin mid‐FY 2019.  Other Issues Paper work has been submitted to TxDOT to create an AFA for design and  environmental reviews of the bridge over I 35.    Page 8 of 104 Rivery Boulevard Extension  (Williams Drive to Northwest Boulevard @ Fontana Drive)  Project No. 5RM     TIP No. AD   July 2016  Project  Description  Develop the Rights‐of‐Way Map, acquire ROW, address potential environmental issues  and complete construction plans specifications and estimate (PS&E) for the extension of  Rivery Boulevard from Williams Drive to Northwest Boulevard at Fontana Drive in  anticipation of future funding availability.  Purpose To provide a route between Williams Drive and Northwest Boulevard serving the  Gateway area, providing an alternate route from Williams Drive to the future  Northwest Boulevard Bridge over IH 35, to provide a route between the hotels in the  Gateway area and the proposed Conference Center near Rivery Boulevard and Wolf  Ranch Parkway.  Project Manager Bill Dryden, P.E.  Engineer Kasberg Patrick and Associates  Element Status / Issues  Design Engineer has submitted 75% plans for City’s review.  Environmental/  Archeology  Complete  Rights of Way Appraisals complete.  Offers have been made to all 22  parcels.  Closed on 6 parcels; 3 pending contract  execution or final closing preparation.  Total Parcels: 22 Appraised: 22 Offers: 22 Acquired: 6 Closing pending: 3 Condemnation: 0 Utility Relocations TBD  Construction Tentatively scheduled to begin mid‐FY 2018.  Other Issues TBD    Page 9 of 104 Snead Drive Project  (SE Inner Loop to Airborn Circle)  Project No. 5QZ      TIP No. BM  July 2016  Project Description   Develop Construction Plans Specifications and Estimate (PS&E) for the widening  of Snead Drive from S.E. Inner Loop to 600 feet north of Cooperative Way,  including appurtenant waste water improvements.  Purpose This project has been identified as GTEC eligible project and will provide  necessary infrastructure for ongoing economic development in the area.   Project Manager Bill Dryden, P.E.  Engineer Steger Bizzell      Element Status / Issues  Design Complete  Environmental/  Archeological  Complete  Rights of Way Complete  Utility Relocations Complete  Construction Project is Substantially Complete (roadway is fully open to traffic; contractor  working on punch‐list and final clean up.)  Final WalkThru scheduled 7/28/16,  awaiting grass to be established.  Other Issues None     Page 10 of 104 Current Capital Improvement Projects TIP No. Project No. Update On Schedule/ Or Behind Project Budget Project Cost Available Current Year Projected Current Year Cost Current Year Available Lakeway Drive Overpass #10 5QL Project Complete. Complete 2,500,000 2,500,000 0 0 0 Southeast Arterial 1 (Sam Houston Avenue)#12 5QG Project Complete. Complete 12,995,625 10,478,499 2,517,126 0 0 Wolf Ranch Parkway Extension (SW Bypass to DB Wood Road) #14A 5QW Project Complete. Complete 1,330,000 1,111,233 218,767 283,350 0 283,350 Southwest Bypass (SH29 to RR2243)#14B 5QC Project Complete. Complete 7,756,432 3,225,132 4,531,300 4,539,107 5,787 4,533,320 Northwest Blvd Overpass #QQ 5QX Engineer is coordinating design with the design for Rivery Boulevard in moving towards construction PS&E for both projects to minimize overlap work between these two projects. Engineer is developing alternatives for storm water outfall. Construction tentatively scheduled to begin mid-FY 2019. In-process Unchanged 1,136,178 1,099,076 37,102 571,178 479,588 91,590 NB Frontage Road (SS 158 to Lakeway)#QQ 5QY We have been informed by TxDOT that it will be doing the Schematic, Environmental, etc., and PS&E for the NB Frontage Road as part of its proposed Williams Drive Bridge project. The City project is on indefinite hold but we will be coordinating with TxDOT on its design project. Indefinite Hold Unchabged 613,822 613,822 0 382,822 382,822 0 ROW - 1460 #EEa #EEb #EEc 5RB Under Construction. Tentatively scheduled to be complete Spring 2018 (TxDOT is administering construction) Utility relocations - ongoing. Two Utility companies (Atmos Energy and Seminole Pipeline) have subnitted invoices for completed relocations for reimbursement. As of October 16th, the City has obtained PUAs or have closings completed or planned for all the remaining FM 1460 parcels. Remaining parcel – pending closing documents. Under Construction Unchanged 11,788,230 5,348,470 6,439,760 6,727,539 2,315,896 4,411,643 TCS/RR Easement 5RD Project Complete. Complete 1,500,000 1,503,148 -3,148 0 0 FM 971 / Washam 5RE Project Complete. Complete 100,000 0 100,000 0 0 Rivery Road 5RF Project Complete. Complete 779,000 29,000 750,000 750,000 0 750,000 Rivery Boulevard 5RM Engineer has submitted 75% plans for City review. Appraisals complete. Offers have been made to all 22 parcels. Closed on 6 parcels; 3 pending contract execution or final closing preparation. Construction tentatively scheduled to begin mid FY 2018. On Schedule Unchanged GTEC PROJECT UPDATE AND STATUS REPORT July 2016 Project to Date Current Year Budget (13/14) L:\Global\CIP Budgetary Worksheets\GTEC Status Report\2016\GTEC - Project Status - 2016-07.xlsx Page 1 of 2 7/13/2016Page 11 of 104 Current Capital Improvement Projects TIP No. Project No. Update On Schedule/ Or Behind Project Budget Project Cost Available Current Year Projected Current Year Cost Current Year Available GTEC PROJECT UPDATE AND STATUS REPORT July 2016 Project to Date Current Year Budget (13/14) Snead Drive 5QZ Project is Substantially Complete (roadway is fully open to traffic; contractor working on punch‐list and final clean up.) Final WalkThru scheduled 7/28/16, awaiting grass to be established. Substantially Complete 825,100 87,000 738,100 825,100 87,000 738,100 Mays Street Extension 5RI Design is Complete ROW acquisition on‐going (3 of 6 parcels acquired) Project advertised June 12th and 19th; Bids to be opened June 30th; GTEC – July 20th; Council – August 9th; Anticipated NTP – Late‐August Anticipated completion Summer 2017 In Process 196,000 196,000 0 196,000 196,000 0 IH 35/ Hwy 29 Intersection 5RJ TBD 650,000 0 650,000 650,000 0 650,000 Current Economic Development Projects Project Type Project No. Update On Schedule/ Or Behind Project Budget Project Cost Available Current Year Budget Current Year Cost Current Year Available 100 S. Austin Ave Eco Devo Project 5RA In-process 507,000 507,000 0 0 Williams Drive Gateway 5RC Engineer working on schematic design alternatives and preliminary cost estimates. On Schedule 65,000 61720 3,280 0 0 Economic Development Projects 1,137,500 1,137,500 1,137,500 0 1,137,500 16,062,596 3,467,093 12,595,503 Project to Date Current Year Budget (13/14) L:\Global\CIP Budgetary Worksheets\GTEC Status Report\2016\GTEC - Project Status - 2016-07.xlsx Page 2 of 2 7/13/2016Page 12 of 104 Austin Avenue Bridges Project  (North and South San Gabriel Bridges)  Project No. TBD     TIP Project No. N/A  July 2016  Project  Description  Develop 30% plans for improvements along Austin Ave. between 3rd Street and Morrow  Street.  The project involves several phases and requires participation and support from  various stakeholders and interested citizens, community businesses, professional  consultants, State and regional transportation partners City Staff and Council.  Schedule Phase Activity Completion  1 Public involvement and alternative analyses, evaluating   alternatives for feasibility and costs, etc.Mid 2016  2 Develop geometric layouts and preliminary construction  estimates for two alternatives Mid 2016  3 Selection of alternative by Council End 2016  4 Develop schematic and 30% plans.Mid 2017 Proj. Mgrs Nat Waggoner, AICP, PMP®, Ed Polasek, AICP; Bill Dryden, P.E.  Engineer Aguirre & Fields, LP    Element Status/Issues Public  Involvement  2nd Public Meeting was held June 28, 2016 at the San Gabriel Community Center  Walking tour – 4:30 to 5:30, Public Meeting from 6:00‐8:00  Design Forensic testing completed. Steel coupon testing 0/30. Results expected by 10/16.  Surveying  Complete  Environmental 4f and Study Scope documents drafted, Meeting 6/13 with TxDOT Rights of Way Exist. ROW from N. of 2nd to Morrow; Additional ROW may be required 3rd to N.  of 2nd.  Utility Relocations TBD  Construction TBD  Other Issues Reports from independent engineering firms completed and will be  distributed the week of  7/4/16.    Page 13 of 104 CDBG Sidewalk Improvements Project  MLK/3rd Street (Scenic Dr. to Austin Ave.)  Project No. None    TIP No. None  July 2016  Project Description Design and preparation of final plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E) for  sidewalk improvements along MLK/ and 3rd streets from Scenic Drive to Austin  Avenue.  Purpose To provide ADA/TDLR compliant sidewalks and ramps along the route.  Project Managers Bill Dryden, P.E.  Engineer Steger Bizzell    Element Status / Issues  Design Complete  Environmental/  Archeological  Complete  Rights of Way N/A  Utility Relocations N/A  Construction Under Construction; approximately 75% complete.  Other Issues None    Page 14 of 104 CDBG Sidewalk Improvements Project  University Avenue (SH 29) (I 35 to Hart St.)  Project No. None    TIP No. None  July 2016  Project Description Design and preparation of final plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E) for  sidewalk improvements along University Avenue (SH 29) from I 35 to Hart Street.  Purpose To provide ADA/TDLR compliant sidewalks in the area.  Project Managers Bill Dryden, P.E.  Engineer Steger Bizzell    Element Status / Issues  Design Complete  Environmental/  Archeological  N/A  Rights of Way Existing  Utility Relocations None identified  Construction NTP – 2nd week of July; expected completion   Other Issues Multiple Use Agreement has been received from TxDOT, signed by the Mayor  and returned for final execution by TxDOT.    Page 15 of 104 FM 971 at Austin Avenue  Realignment Intersection Improvements  Project No. 1BZ     TIP No. AG  July 2016  Project Description Design and preparation of final plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E) for the  widening and realignment of FM 971 at Austin Avenue, eastward to Gann Street.  Purpose To provide a new alignment consistent with the alignment of the proposed  Northwest Boulevard Bridge over IH 35; to allow a feasible, alternate route from  the west side of I 35 to Austin Avenue, to Georgetown High School, to San Gabriel  Park and a more direct route to SH 130.  Project Managers Bill Dryden, P.E.  Engineer Klotz Associates, Inc.    Element Status / Issues  Design Preliminary Engineering complete;   Engineer’s work for the 60% design submittal is on hold pending discussion and  recommendation from GTAB for alignment.  Environmental/  Archeological  TBD  Rights of Way Complete  Utility Relocations TBD  Construction TBD  Other Issues On hold pending resolution of discussions on a potential alternative alignment.    Page 16 of 104 FM 1460  Quail Valley Drive to University Drive  Project No. 5RB     TIP No. BO & CD  July 2016  Unchanged  Project Description Design and preparation of plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E) for the  widening and reconstruction of FM 1460.  Project will include review and update  to existing Schematic, Right‐of‐Way Map and Environmental Document and  completion of the PS&E for the remaining existing roadway.  Purpose To keep the currently approved environmental documents active; purchase ROW,  effect utility relocations/clearance and to provide on‐the‐shelf PS&E for TxDOT  letting not later than August 2013, pending available construction funding.  Project Managers Ed Polasek, AICP and Bill Dryden, P.E.  Engineer Brown and Gay Engineers, Inc.    Element Status / Issues  Design Complete  Environmental/  Archeological  Complete  Rights of Way 1 remaining parcel of original 36 – pending closing documents.  Utility Relocations Ongoing  Construction Construction is on‐going  Other Issues Engineer preparing Change Orders for construction contract.    Page 17 of 104 Jim Hogg Drive/Road at Williams Drive  Intersection and Signalization Improvements  Project No. 1DE    TIP No. None  July 2106  Project Description Design and preparation of final plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E) for the  widening of Jim Hogg at the intersection of Williams Drive, inclusive of installation  of a traffic signal.  Purpose To provide a widened 3‐lane section with signal at the intersection of Jim Hogg and  Williams Drive.  The proposed improvements will provide improved access for the  residents and the employees of the new City Service Center to Williams Drive.  Project Manager Bill Dryden, P.E.  Engineer Kimley‐Horn and Associates, Inc.    Element Status / Issues  Design Complete  Environmental/  Archeological  Complete  Rights of Way Existing  Utility Relocations Complete  Construction Construction is substantially complete.  All driveways placed, road paved and striped; traffic signal in flash mode 06/27  and full operation mode 07/06; NB Hogg all lanes open; SB Hogg needs some  dress‐up; expect to have all lanes open Wednesday 6/29.  Walk‐thru to be scheduled during the week of 07/05‐08.  Other Issues None    Page 18 of 104 Southwest Bypass Project   (RM 2243 to IH 35)  Project No. 1CA     Project No. BK  July 2016  Unchanged  Project Description Develop PS&E for Southwest Bypass from Leander Road (RM 2243) to IH 35 in the  ultimate configuration for construction of approximately 1.5 miles of interim 2‐lane  roadway from Leander Road (RM 2243) to its intersection with the existing Inner  Loop underpass at IH 35.  Purpose To extend an interim portion of the SH 29 Bypass, filling in between Leander Road  (RM 2243) to IH 35 Southbound Frontage Road.  Project Manager Williamson County  City Contact: Ed Polasek, AICP and Bill Dryden, P.E.  Engineer HDR, Inc.      Element Status / Issues  Williamson County  Project Status  (from WilCo’s  status  report)  Southwest Bypass Driveways – Award of the construction contract was approved  at 3/8/16 Commissioners Court Meeting. Five (5) bids were received on 2/24/16, with  the apparent low bidder being Smith Contracting with a bid of $289,981.90.  NTP is  anticipated to be issued 5/2/16 with Time Charges beginning on 5/12/16. A  Preconstruction meeting was held 4/15/16.  Southwest Bypass (RM 2243 to IH 35) – A meeting with HDR to discuss the WA  Supplemental and project status was held on 3/9/16. A meeting with TxDOT and the  City of Georgetown to discuss the turn lanes on RM 2243 was held on 3/9/16. A  meeting with the City of Georgetown and County staff was held on 2/26/16 to  discuss project status. A 30% PS&E Submittal for the Southwest Bypass Phase 1 was  received on 2/23/16 and is under review. A GEC Constructability review meeting  was held on 3/3/16. An ILA with the City of Georgetown was approved by  Commissioners Court on 2/23/16. Comments were issued 2/18/16 on a 60% PS&E  submittal for turn lanes on RM 2243 at Southwest Bypass.  Rights of Way Complete for the parcels east of the Texas Crushed Stone properties.  Other Issues City and WilCo completing the Interlocal Agreement for the Project.    Page 19 of 104 Transit Development Plan  (Fixed Route Bus)  July 2016  Project  Description  The purpose of this study is to develop a local transit plan for the City of Georgetown that  serves transit needs of the citizens within the city limits and connect to existing and future  regional transit options to form a regional  transit  network  that  would  improve  mobility,   improve  the  region’s  environmental  and economic sustainability and slow the increase of  congestion on roadways.  Schedule Phase Activity Completion   1 Initiation Fall 2014  2 Public Involvement, Existing Conditions, Recommendations Spring 2015  3 Initial Report Completed Summer 2015  4 Boards and Commissions Review, Council May 2016  5 Consideration by Council August 16, 2016 Proj. Mgrs Ed Polasek, AICP; Nat Waggoner, AICP, PMP®; Bill Dryden, P.E.  Engineer AECOM, Capital Metro    Element Status/Issues  Public  Involvement  2 Public Meetings  Public Intercept Survey, Online Survey, GYAB Survey, Multiple Stakeholder Interviews More than 20 presentations  Design Revisions underway based on changed conditions  Next Step(s) Council consideration of TDP Adoption and FY17 Budget Inclusion      Page 20 of 104 Transportation Services Operations  CIP Maintenance  July 2016  Project Description 2016‐2017 CIP Maintenance of roadways including, Chip seal, Cutler Overlays,  Fog seal applications and Engineering design of future rehabilitation projects.  Purpose To provide protection and maintain an overall pavement condition index of  85%.  Project Manager Mark Miller  Engineer/Engineers KPA, LP  Task Status / Issues     Chip Seal  Contractor has indicated his intention to move into Georgetown on July 25th  and work through August.  PMM (polymer modified masterseal) with chip  seal contract.     HIPR/Overlay Preconstruction was held on June 16th.  Tree trimming July 5th to the 12th.   Notice to proceed will be July 18th.  Contractor to pave Maple Street between  July 26th  and August 11th.  Southwestern preference 26‐29.  Sun City provided  a calendar of events in the area of the amenity center in July and August to  help determine the best times to cross driveways with the moving operation.  Curb and Gutter  Engineering 2016  Plans should be complete in July.  Advertising in August and bring to  GTAB for recommendation in September.    Page 21 of 104 Southwest Bypass (Leander Rd. to Wolf Ranch Parkway Extension)  Wolf Ranch Parkway Extension (SW Bypass to DB Wood Rd.)  Project No. 1DI       OTP Project No. AD & AZ1  July 2016  Project  Description  Construction of Southwest Bypass from Leander Road (RM 2243) to Wolf Ranch  Parkway Extension and Wolf Ranch Parkway Extension from Southwest Bypass to  DB Wood Road.  Remaining Project Schedule  Notice to Proceed Issued  Completion of Construction Late‐Spring 2018 Purpose To complete a connection from Leander Road (RM 2243) to University Ave. (SH 29)  Project Manager Joel Weaver (Construction)  Engineer HDR, Inc.    Element Status / Issues  Design Complete  Surveying  Complete  Environmental Complete  Rights of Way ROW/PUA acquired.  Utility  Relocations  Complete or part of Construction  Construction Contractor has cleared the ROW and begun setting subgrade.  Other Issues Residents of the adjacent Legend Oaks Subdivision are strongly urging City to  install concrete/rock facia fencing along edge of development.     Page 22 of 104 2015 Road Bond Program  Citywide Sidewalk Improvements Project  2015 Sidewalk Master Plan  Project No. None    TIP No. None  July 2016  Project Description The proposed project encompasses sidewalk improvements at various locations  within the City of Georgetown.  Improvements include curb ramps, crosswalks,  pedestrian‐actuated signal infrastructure (“ped heads”), and sidewalk  extensions/reconstructions.  Purpose To provide ADA/TDLR compliant sidewalks and ramps identified in the 2015  Sidewalk Master Plan.  Project Managers Nat Waggoner, AICP, PMP®, Bill Dryden, P.E.  Engineer Steger Bizzell    Element Status / Issues  Design July‐Oct 2016  Environmental/  Archeological  Aug‐Oct 2016  Rights of Way June 2016 – Survey completed Utility Relocations N/A  Construction Jan‐Apr 2017  Other Issues None    Page 23 of 104 City of Georgetown, Texas Transportation Enhancement Corp July 20, 2016 SUBJECT: Presentatio n of Geo rgeto wn Transportation Enhancement Corporatio n monthly financial rep o rts fo r June 2016. Leigh Wallac e, Financ e Directo r, COG, F inance Manager, GTEC. ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: n/a SUBMITTED BY: Jana Kern o n behalf of Leigh Wallace ATTACHMENTS: Description Type June financials Cover Memo Page 24 of 104 Meeting Date July 20, 2016 Item No. _________ GEORGETOWN TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT CORPORATION AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET SUBJECT: Presentation of Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation monthly financial reports for June 2016. Leigh Wallace, Finance Director, COG, Finance Manager, GTEC. ITEM SUMMARY: The Bylaws of GTEC (Article V, Section 6.02) require the Finance Manager to report the financial activity of the Corporation to the Board. • Financial reports • Sales Tax revenues • Any other relevant financial information Sales tax is received two months in arrears; therefore the revenues reflect only the amount received, not actually earned, as of the report date. A report on payments made to vendors for the month of June is also included. ATTACHMENTS: Monthly Financial Report Sales Tax History Disbursement Report SUBMITTED BY: Leigh Wallace Finance Director, COG Finance Manager, GTEC Page 25 of 104 YEAR-END YEAR-END APPROVED JUN-16 YEAR TO DATE YEAR-END VARIANCE % VARIANCE BUDGET W/ENCUMB W/ENCUMB PROJECTION FAV(UNFAV)FAV(UNFAV) BEGINNING BALANCE 8,592,116 8,528,267 (63,849)(0.7%) OPERATING REVENUE Sales Tax 5,381,250 436,692 3,273,914 5,625,000 243,750 4.5% Public Improve. District Assessments 500,000 0 0 500,000 0 0.0% Interest 15,000 11,286 46,485 36,000 21,000 140.0% Reimbursement from TXDOT 450,000 0 77,867 450,000 0 0.0% Total Operating Revenue 6,346,250 447,978 3,398,266 6,611,000 264,750 4.2% OPERATING EXPENDITURES Administrative Support 376,132 (65,867)124,585 124,901 251,231 66.8% Debt Service 2,572,312 509,314 985,923 2,638,581 (66,269)(2.6%) Total Operating Expenditures 2,948,444 443,447 1,110,508 2,763,482 184,962 6.3% TOTAL NET OPERATIONS 3,397,806 4,532 2,287,758 3,847,518 79,788 2.3% NON-OPERATING REVENUE Debt Proceeds (FY16)17,500,000 509,167 11,217,429 11,659,167 (5,840,833)(33.4%) Total Non-Operating Revenue 17,500,000 509,167 11,217,429 11,659,167 (5,840,833)(33.4%) NON-OPERATING EXPENDITURES ROW 1460 (FY12)500,000 0 361,130 500,000 0 0.0% FM 1460 Widening (FY15)61,000 0 3 61,000 0 0.0% SW Bypass-SH 29 to RM 2243 (FY14)1,332,579 0 1,023,911 1,332,579 0 0.0% SW Bypass-SW Inner Loop 29 (FY15)0 0 8,585 8,585 (8,585)NA SW Bypass-2243 to IH35 (FY06)1,121,000 0 9,035 1,121,000 0 0.0% Arterial SE 1-Inner Loop (FY04)0 0 2,036 2,036 (2,036)NA FM 971 Northwest-Washam IH35 (FY09)91,590 0 0 91,590 0 0.0% Wolf Ranch Pkwy Ext - DB Wood (FY10)283,350 0 0 0 283,350 100.0% Snead Dr (FY11)20,000 0 46 46 19,954 99.8% Williams Dr Gateway (FY13)794,000 0 215 794,000 0 0.0% Rivery-Ext Williams Dr to NW Blvd (FY16)1,500,000 0 1,590,966 1,590,966 (90,966)(6.1%) Rivery-TIA Improvements (FY16)1,400,000 0 0 400,000 1,000,000 71.4% Rivery-Rivery Rd (FY13)721,000 0 0 721,000 0 0.0% SH 29 Int.-IH35 to Haven Ln (FY14)650,000 0 0 0 650,000 100.0% Pecan Center Dr to Airport Rd (FY15)6,364,000 0 0 2,000,000 4,364,000 68.6% Mays St (FY15)10,150,000 38 2,783 10,150,000 0 0.0% Available for Projects TBD 1,345,312 0 0 0 1,345,312 100.0% Total Non-Operating Expenditures 26,333,831 38 2,998,710 18,772,802 7,561,029 28.7% TOTAL NET NON-OPERATIONS (8,833,831)509,128 8,218,720 (7,113,635)1,720,196 (19.5%) EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF TOTAL REVENUE OVER TOTAL REQUIREMENTS (5,436,025)513,660 10,506,477 (3,266,117)2,169,908 (39.9%) ENDING BALANCE 3,156,091 5,262,150 2,106,059 66.7% RESERVED ENDING BALANCE 1,474,063 Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation Fund Year End Projection to Approved as of June 2016 Page 26 of 104 Variance % Var. Month [a]2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 To FY 15 To FY 15 Oct 281,056 345,296 367,451 392,374 424,201 31,827 8.11% Nov 297,888 328,333 398,208 411,566 451,065 39,499 9.60% Dec 447,872 470,330 538,728 575,095 592,798 17,703 3.08% Jan 292,708 330,857 357,430 350,778 386,252 35,474 10.11% Feb 291,782 311,562 347,604 356,428 432,468 76,040 21.33% Mar 423,287 462,254 457,421 495,804 533,967 38,163 7.70% Apr 325,447 337,678 424,007 410,683 435,906 25,223 6.14% May 323,676 377,648 450,289 382,794 481,672 98,878 25.83% Jun 398,654 456,529 493,224 522,356 Jul 359,877 371,061 409,739 435,977 Aug 343,168 370,942 392,059 411,552 Sep 353,337 500,787 477,892 500,805 Total 4,138,751$ 4,663,277$ 5,114,052$ 5,246,212$ 3,738,329$ 362,807$ YTD 2,683,716 2,963,958 3,341,139 3,375,522 3,738,329 362,807 10.75%[b] Notes: [a] Sales tax revenue from the State Comptroller is received two months in arrears. [b] YTD compared thru current month. Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation $0.00 $100,000.00 $200,000.00 $300,000.00 $400,000.00 $500,000.00 $600,000.00 $700,000.00 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Re v e n u e s Sales Tax 3 Year Trend 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Page 27 of 104 Check Report Summary For the Month Ending June 30, 2016 Atmos Energy Corp 153,211.91 ROW 1460 153,211.91 Gardere Wynne Sewell LP 1,416.00 Arterial SE1: Inner Loop/SH130 88.50 SH 29 to RM 2243 SW Bypass 708.00 Rivery Ext 619.50 Brown and Gay Engineers Inc 16,418.74 Pecan Center Dr / Airport Rd 10,913.30 Pecan Center Dr / Airport Rd 5,505.44 Chiang, Patel, & Yerby Inc 31,769.16 Mays Street 17,403.00 Mays Street 12,081.16 Mays Street 2,285.00 Gardere Wynne Sewell LP 2,802.50 SW Bypass 2243 to IH35 826.00 Rivery Ext 118.00 Rivery Ext 177.00 SH 29 to RM 2243 1,681.50 Joe Bland Construction LP 109,591.05 Snead Dr 57,413.25 Snead Dr 52,177.80 Klotz Associates Inc 38,671.37 FM 971 / Fontana NW Bridge 21,198.77 FM 971 / Fontana NW Bridge 11,755.75 FM 971 / Fontana NW Bridge 5,716.85 Terracon Consultants Inc 5,142.00 Snead Dr 1,497.00 Snead Dr 3,363.00 Snead Dr 282.00 Kasberg, Patrick 10,772.40 Williams Drive Gateway 9,775.40 Williams Drive Gateway 997.00 369,795.13 369,795.13 Page 28 of 104 City of Georgetown, Texas Transportation Enhancement Corp July 20, 2016 SUBJECT: Cons id eration and p o s s ib le ac tion to approve minutes fro m the regular GTEC Board meeting held June 15, 2016. David Morgan, City Manager - COG, General Manager - GTEC ITEM SUMMARY: Bo ard to review the minutes fro m the meeting held on June 15, 2016 and revis e or ap p ro ve. FINANCIAL IMPACT: n/a SUBMITTED BY: David Morgan, City Manager - jk ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Draft Minutes Cover Memo Page 29 of 104 Minutes of the Meeting of Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation and the Governing Body of the City of Georgetown, Texas Wednesday, June 15, 2016 The Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation of the City of Georgetown, Texas, met on Wednesday June 15, 2016. Board Members Present: Tom Crawford - President, Joe Pondrom - Secretary, John Hesser, Leo Wood, Colin McGahey, Jay Warren arrived at 3:35 Board Members Absent: Ty Gipson Staff Present: Laurie Brewer, Mike Babin, Leigh Wallace, Jana Kern, Ed Polasek, Bill Dryden, Paul Diaz, Mark Miller Others Present: Minutes Regular Session A. Call to Order – Mr. Tom Crawford called the regular GTEC Board meeting to order on Wednesday, June 15, 2016 at 3:30 PM The Board may, at any time, recess the Regular Session to convene in Executive Session at the President, A Board Member, The City Manager, Assistant City Manager, General Manager of Utilities, City Council Member, and/or legal counsel for any purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code Chapter 551, and are subject to action in the Regular Session that follows. B. Introduction of Visitors C. Industry/CAMPO/TXDOT Updates: CAMPO TIP (5 year program) will be having their Public Meeting tonight June 15, 2016, here in Georgetown. The Policy Board will be deferring any action on Lone Star Rail until August. D. Discussion regarding the Project Progress Reports and Time Lines. – Bill Dryden, P.E., Transportation Engineer and Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Transportation Services Director E. Presentation of Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation monthly financial report for May 2016. – Leigh Wallace, Finance Director, COG, Finance Manager, GTEC F. Sales tax presentation regarding FY2016 and FY2017 projected sales tax collections. - Paul Diaz, Budget Manager Diaz gave the Board a presentation on the projected sales tax. Legislative Regular Agenda G. Consideration and possible action to approve the minutes from the regular GTEC Board meeting held May 18, 2016. – David Morgan, General Manager, GTEC Board Motion by Warren second by Hesser to approve the minutes as presented. Approved 6-1 (Gipson absent) Page 30 of 104 H. Discussion and possible action to adopt the FY2017 proposed GTEC budget and set a date for the public hearing on the proposed budget. Leigh Wallace, Finance Director, COG, Finance Manager, GTEC Wallace explained/reviewed the FY16/FY17 budget to the Board. Wallace also informed the Board and Staff that there was no need for a public hearing since there were no new projects. Motion by Pondrom seconded by Wood to approve the Administrative Contract. Approved 6-1 (Gipson absent) Motion by Warren second by Pondrom to adopt the proposed FY16/17 Budget as presented. Approved 5-1-1 (Hesser against, Gipson absent) Adjournment Motion by Wood second by Warren to adjourn meeting. Approved 6-1 (Gipson absent) Meeting adjourned at 5:10 PM Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 5:10 PM. Approved: Attest: _______________________ ________________________ Tom Crawford - President Joe Pondrom – Secretary _________________________ Jana R. Kern – Board Liaison Page 31 of 104 City of Georgetown, Texas Transportation Enhancement Corp July 20, 2016 SUBJECT: Cons id eration and pos s ible ac tion to approve Task Order MSE-16-001 with M&S Engineering, LLC, of Geo rgeto wn, Texas , for professional engineering s ervic es related to the final engineering d es ign for cons tructio n p lans, spec ific ations and es timate fo r the Rivery Bo ulevard TIA Imp ro vements in the amount o f $$239,800.00. – Bill Dryd en, P.E., Trans portation Engineer and Edward G. P o las ek, AICP, Trans p o rtation S ervic es Directo r. ITEM SUMMARY: The Rivery Boulevard Traffic Imp act Analys is (TIA) Improvements Projec t is ap p ro ved in the FY 2015- 2016 GTEC b udget in the amo unt o f $1,400,000.00 fo r vario us roadway imp ro vements s temming from the d evelopment o f the Sherato n Hotel and Co nference Center and the Summit at Rivery. T he C ity has s elected the firm o f M&S Engineering, LLC, with lo cal o ffic es in Georgeto wn, as the most qualified firm to d evelop the F inal Plans , Spec ificatio ns and Estimate (P S&E) alignment, p reliminary engineering plans and rights-of-way doc uments fo r the p ro ject. The attac hed Tas k Ord er MSE-16-001 proposes provid e p ro fes s io nal engineering s ervic es to complete final PS &E ready for cons tructio n in an amo unt o f $239,800.00. Staff has reviewed and c o nc urs with the Sc o p e of Servic es and Man Ho urs (fee) required fo r this work. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends ap p ro val o f Task Order MSE-16-001 with M&S Engineering, LLC, of Georgetown, Texas , fo r professional engineering services related to the final engineering d es ign for cons truction p lans , s p ecific ations and es timate for the Rivery Bo ulevard TIA Imp ro vements in the amo unt o f $$239,800.00. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Funding fo r the Projec t is available in the FY 2015-2016 GT EC bud get. T he financial analys is wo rksheet is attached . SUBMITTED BY: Bill Dryden, P.E.; Trans portation Engineer ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Financial Analys is Works heet Backup Material Propos ed Tas k Order MSE-16-001 with Attachments Backup Material Page 32 of 104 PROJECT No.DATE: PROJECT NAME: 5RP 7/11/2016 Division/Department: Director Approval EGP 7/11/16 Prepared By:Finance Approval TOTAL ANNUAL BUDGET 1,400,000.00 (Current year only) Actual Cost Agenda Total Spent Encumbrance Item & Encumbered % Annual (A) before agenda item (B)(A + B) Budget Consulting (MSE-16-001)239,800.00 239,800.00 17% Right of Way 0.00 0% Construction 0.00 0% Other Costs 0.00 0% Total Current Year Costs 0.00 239,800.00 239,800.00 Approved GENERAL LEDGER ACCOUNT NUMBER CY Budget 400-9-0980-90-064 1,400,000.00 Total Budget 1,400,000.00 TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET 1,400,000.00 (includes all previous yrs.) Prior Years Current Year Total Project % Total Spent/Encumbered Costs Costs Budget Consulting 0.00 239,800.00 239,800.00 17% Right of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% Other Costs 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% Total Project Costs 0.00 239,800.00 239,800.00 Bill Dryden, Transportation Engineer Transportation Services CIP - Budgetary and Financial Analysis Worksheet Comments: GTEC FY 2015-2016 Budget Rivery TIA Improvements Rivery TIA Impv'ts Design Page 33 of 104 TASK ORDER Georgetown – Revised 3.11 EJCDC E-505 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Engineer Professional Services—Task Order Edition Copyright ©2004 National Society of Professional Engineers for EJCDC. All rights reserved. Attachment 1 – Task Order Form Page 1 of 4 Task Order In accordance with paragraph 1.01 of the Master Services Agreement between Owner and M&S Engineering, LLC (“Engineer”) for Professional Services – Task Order Edition, dated June 3, 2016 ("Agreement"), Owner and Engineer agree as follows: 1. Specific Project Data A. Title: Rivery Boulevard TIA Improvements ____________ B. Description: The proposed project encompasses northbound to eastbound right turn lanes and associated improvements at three (3) locations: 1) Wolf Ranch Parkway; 2) Hintz Road and; 3) Williams Drive. Schematic level plans, and opinion of probable construction cost will be prepared for right turn lane for eastbound Williams Drive to Rivery Boulevard. Improvements include widening of pavement, drainage and water quality systems, traffic signal modifications (Wolf Ranch Pkwy. and Williams Dr.), pavement markings, SWPPP, street lighting, traffic control, traffic signage, sidewalks, survey and subsurface utility engineering and environmental services. C. City of Georgetown Project Number: 400-9-0980-90-064 D. City of Georgetown General Ledger Account No.: 5RP E. City of Georgetown Purchase Order No.: F. Master Services Agreement, Contract Number: 2016-736-MSA 2. Services of Engineer See the attached Scope of Services for a detailed description of services to be provided to Owner by Engineer. 3. Owner's Responsibilities Owner shall have those responsibilities set forth in the Agreement subject to the following: • Provide timely review comments to plan reviews and project scope changes. • Provide Agent Authorization to submit agency documentation, if required. • Estimated third-party fees for this project are listed below, and are included in the compensation amount detailed in Section 5. The City shall be responsible for any permitting and third-party review fees not listed below, or in excess of those listed below. o TCEQ Recharge Zone WPAP Modification Fee ($4,650) o WCCF Permit Fee ($400) o TDLR RAS Registration Fee ($175) 4. Times for Rendering Services Engineer shall perform the work stated above according to the schedule below. Durations are from the date of Notice to Proceed from Owner, or the previous phase, as appropriate. Durations may be Task Order No. MSE-16-001, consisting of 21 pages. Page 34 of 104 TASK ORDER Georgetown – Revised 3.11 EJCDC E-505 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Engineer Professional Services—Task Order Edition Copyright ©2004 National Society of Professional Engineers for EJCDC. All rights reserved. Attachment 1 – Task Order Form Page 2 of 4 concurrent or partially concurrent. Durations are expected to be sequential, but unforeseen factors (e.g. delays due to extended third-party reviews, delays due to Board or Council action, etc.) may suspend time accruement. See the Scope of Services for more information. Phase Completion Date Survey Phase Four (4) Weeks SUE Services Phase Four (4) Weeks Design & TCEQ Coordination Phase Thirty-five (35) Weeks Bidding Phase Eight (8) Weeks Construction Phase Thirty (30) Weeks 5. Payments to Engineer A. Owner shall pay Engineer for services rendered as follows: Category of Services Compensation Method Lump Sum or Not to Exceed Amount of Compensation for Services Survey, Design, TCEQ Coordination, Bidding Phase, & Construction Phase Administration Lump Sum $239,800.00 B. The terms of payment are set forth in Article 4 of the Agreement unless modified in this Task Order. 6. Consultants: Prime consultant is M&S Engineering, LLC. Sub-consultants will be Cox-McLain Environmental Consultants for environmental services and Altura Solutions, LP for TDLR/TAS compliance. 7. Other Modifications to Agreement: None. 8. Attachments: Exhibit "A" – Project Location Map Exhibit "B" – Scope of Services Exhibit "C" – Schedule of Owner’s Responsibilities Exhibit "D" – Estimated Fee Schedule 9. Documents Incorporated By Reference: The Agreement, effective June 3, 2016. Page 35 of 104 TASK ORDER Georgetown – Revised 3.11 EJCDC E-505 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Engineer Professional Services—Task Order Edition Copyright ©2004 National Society of Professional Engineers for EJCDC. All rights reserved. Attachment 1 – Task Order Form Page 3 of 4 Terms and Conditions: Execution of this Task Order by Owner and Engineer shall make it subject to the terms and conditions of the Agreement (as modified above), which Agreement is incorporated by this reference. Engineer is authorized to begin performance upon its receipt of a copy of this Task Order signed by Owner. The Effective Date of this Task Order is , 2016. OWNER: City of Georgetown ENGINEER: M&S Engineering, LLC By: By: Name: Dale Ross Name: Thomas N. Turk, PE Title: Mayor Title: Contract/Project Manager Engineer License or Firm’s Certificate No. F-1394 State of: Texas Date: Date: ATTEST: ____________________________________ Shelley Nowling, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM ONLY BY CITY ATTORNEY AND BY CITY COUNCIL MARCH 8, 2011, AGENDA ITEM “P” APPROVED AS TO FORM VERIFIED: ________________________________________ Vickie Graff, CPPO, CTPM Contract Coordinator STATE OF TEXAS § CORPORATE COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON § ACKNOWLEDGEMENT On this day of , 2014, Thomas N. Turk personally appeared before me and proved to me through satisfactory evidence of identification to be the person who signed this document in my presence. [SEAL] ________________________________________ Notary Public My Commission Expires:____________________ for July 13, 2016 Page 36 of 104 TASK ORDER Georgetown – Revised 3.11 EJCDC E-505 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Engineer Professional Services—Task Order Edition Copyright ©2004 National Society of Professional Engineers for EJCDC. All rights reserved. Attachment 1 – Task Order Form Page 4 of 4 Owner: Engineer: Designated Representative For Task Order: Designated Representative For Task Order: Name: Bill Dryden, P.E. Name: Steven D. Widacki, P.E. Title: Transportation Engineer Title: Sr. Project Manager Address: 300-1 Industrial Ave. Address: 102 W. Morrow, Ste. 101 Georgetown, TX 78626 Georgetown, TX 78626 E-Mail: Bill.Dryden@georgetown.org E-Mail: swidacki@msengr.com Phone: (512) 930-8096 Phone: (512) 686-3924 Fax: (512) 930-3559 Fax: (830) 885-2170 Page 37 of 104 EXHIBIT "A" PROJECT LOCATION MAP HINTZ RD 12 3 4S LEGEND RIGHT TURN LANE LOCATIONS Page 1 of 1Page 38 of 104 Engineering Service Agreement Exhibit B Page 1 of 12 EXHIBIT B SCHEDULE OF ENGINEER’S SERVICES Rivery Boulevard T.I.A Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Project includes preparation of plans, specifications and opinion of probable construction cost for the addition of right turn lanes and associated improvements for traffic turning from northbound Rivery Boulevard to each of the following three (3) locations: 1) Wolf Ranch Parkway; 2) Hintz Road, and; 3) Williams Drive. Schematic level plans, and opinion of probable construction cost will be prepared for a right turn lane for traffic turning from eastbound Williams Drive to Rivery Boulevard. Storage length for the turn lane at each location shall be from the Summit at Rivery TIA Update (TIA) dated October 31, 2013. The project includes widening of the pavement, drainage and water quality systems, traffic signal modifications (Wolf Ranch Parkway and Williams Drive), pavement markings, SWPPP, street lighting, traffic control, traffic signage, sidewalks, survey and subsurface utility engineering, and environmental services. BASIC SERVICES A. Design Standards 1. This project shall be designed in accordance with the following: City of Georgetown Drainage Criteria Manual City of Georgetown Unified Development Code City of Georgetown Standard Details City of Georgetown Construction Specifications and Standards TxDOT Standard Specifications for Construction and Maintenance of Highways, Streets, and Bridges. 2. All plans submitted to the City shall be signed and sealed in accordance with the Texas Engineering Practice Act. B. Project Management 1. Attend project "Kick-off” meeting and subsequent progress/coordination meetings (assume 6 total). 2. Prepare brief monthly progress report in support of invoicing. 3. Prepare meeting minutes and distribute to appropriate team members. 4. Maintain an “action Item” list. 5. Manage all sub-consultants and coordinate activities with the City. 6. Provide project information to the City for the use of communication to the public via social media and regular media outlets. C. Research and Data Collection 1. Meet with City staff and obtain pertinent record drawings, plats, easements information and other information available for the project area. This includes Page 39 of 104 Engineering Service Agreement Exhibit B Page 2 of 12 TCEQ Edwards Aquifer WPAP information affecting each of the turn lane locations, particularly those completed for the Rivery development and related to the Rivery Blvd. improvements. 2. Meet with the City project manager and conduct an on-site review and walk through of the project area. 3. Photograph and video the project area to assist in documenting pre-construction conditions. D. Design Survey 1. Provide design surveying to support the project design and construction. The area to be surveyed includes: A) Rivery Blvd. from 50-feet north of the Hintz Road north curb line to 300-feet south of the Hershey Ave. south curb line; B) Rivery Blvd. from north Williams Dr. ROW line to Country Club Drive including intersection and signals, and; C) Williams Dr. from 100-feet west of the Central Dr. east curb line to 100-feet east of the Rivery Blvd. east curb line. Widths along Rivery Blvd. and Williams Dr. shall extend 40-feet from east and south curb lines, respectively, or until face-of-building. The design survey includes: a. Establish a horizontal and vertical control network and project control baseline for the project area tied to existing City control. b. Establish horizontal and vertical project control monumentation. c. If possible, survey control will be tied to existing TxDOT control. d. Survey control will be in the State Plane Coordinate System, Texas Central Zone 4203 (NAD83). e. Perform vertical closure loop. f. Set bench marks for design and construction improvements in accordance with the “Manual of Practice for Land Surveying in Texas”. g. Tie right-of-way lines and corners, property lines and corners, buildings, fences, trees (4-inch caliper and larger), edges of pavements and all other visible surface features to the project control baseline. Existing utility structures shall be located and referenced by utility name (GUS, AT&T, Atmos, etc.). h. Vertical topographic information tying pavement, driveways, walls, manholes (top and inverts), storm drain inlets (top and inverts), and other improvements as needed within the project area for design. i. Provide roadway cross sections at intervals of fifty (50) feet relative to the project baseline and at all driveways, street intersections, drainage channels or outfalls or other areas of significance. Cross sections are for project design review and quantity takeoffs and will be part of the plan set as well as the final construction plan set. j. When underground utilities are exposed, tie to the project control baseline. k. Locate utility crossings and adjacent utilities, driveways, drainage structures, and other nearby improvements as identified from field surveys and information provided by utility companies and other record drawings. l. Identify the street address of all adjacent properties to the proposed construction and show on drawings. m. Create topographic surface with 1-foot contour intervals. Page 40 of 104 Engineering Service Agreement Exhibit B Page 3 of 12 E. Subsurface Utility Engineering Underground utilities exist throughout the project limits. To assess their locations relative to the proposed improvements a QL-B SUE investigation in the project area will be conducted to the same limits identified in the “Design Survey” section above. Right of entry to all areas to be provided by the City. 1. Designate all underground utilities within the project area to Quality Level B as much as possible, with the exception of wastewater and storm sewer. These will be located separately in the scope for the Design Survey. a. Contact utility companies for record drawings, and using these utility record drawings to apply quality levels C and D where appropriate, in any areas where QL-B data cannot be obtained. Quality levels of SUE apply as defined in “Standard Guideline for the Collection and Depiction of Existing Subsurface Utility Data (CI/ASCE 38-02)”. b. A set of sealed SUE deliverables available in hard copy, as well as in AutoCAD format will be provided, and rectified to NAD83 State Plane coordinates, Texas Central Zone. F. Right-of-Way and Easement Requirements 1. Prepare Schematic Layout of improvements for use in producing preliminary list of right-of-way parcels and easements required for project construction. 2. Prepare a preliminary list of right-of-way parcels and easements necessary to construct the project (if any). Submit to the City project manager no less than twenty (20) days prior to submittal of the preliminary plans for City review. 3. Meet with the City project manager to determine easement and right-of-way requirements for preparation of field notes and exhibits. 4. Submit schematic layout to TxDOT area office for review and comment. G. Traffic Engineering 1. Utilizing model from Summit at Rivery TIA Update (TIA) prepared by Alliance Transportation Group dated October 31, 2013 review and perform modeling of intersections proposed for improvement under this scope at “build-out conditions (2026)” levels. Intersection analyses will be conducted using current version of Synchro. 2. Conduct evaluation of technical criteria/data (FHWA, etc.) and assess turn bay storage length recommendations provided in the TIA at locations identified for improvement as part of this scope. 3. Prepare letter report summarizing conclusions and recommendations of the preceding tasks compared to results of TIA. H. Environmental Services 1. Environmental Tech Memo Preparation for City-Funded Project The turn lanes on Rivery Blvd. require preparation of an environmental technical memo, which is intended to document compliance with environmental regulations that are applicable to a City-funded project. Page 41 of 104 Engineering Service Agreement Exhibit B Page 4 of 12 A. Investigate Relevant Resource Categories A.1 Cultural Resources Archival research will be done in the electronic and mapping files of the Texas Historical Commission (THC) Atlas Sites database, the Texas Archeological Research Laboratory (TARL), and/or any other relevant archives for data on previous cultural resource investigations conducted and earlier recorded sites and historic properties in the vicinity of the project’s Area of Potential Effect (APE). The results of this research will be summarized in the environmental report. A.2 Water Resources data on surface water streams and other existing water resources and the potential for pollution during construction and from the completed facility will be collected. The 100-year flood plain, as delineated by FEMA, will be identified and the impacts of the proposed project will be assessed. A Geologic Assessment (GA) will be completed, and potential for impacts to groundwater and the Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone will be evaluated. A.2.1 Wetlands and Other Waters of the U.S. Evaluations of wetlands and waters of the U.S. in all areas potentially affected by the proposed project will be performed by wetlands specialists. Wetland field delineations will be conducted and wetland data sheets will be prepared and included in the report appendix. This task will include a determination of the type of permit (if any) that will be needed from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). The permit determination will be summarized in the report. Any 404 permit tasks would be carried out under an additional scope and budget. A.3 Biological Resources Project area biological resources including vegetation communities and wildlife habitat will be described by biologists. Ecologically sensitive resources, plus likely threatened or endangered species habitat, will be identified and their potential to be affected by project construction and operation will be assessed and described in the environmental report. A wildlife habitat assessment for suitability for endangered species will be done. Because much of the project area has been previously disturbed, there is a low chance for suitable habitat, and no presence/absence surveys are expected. Still, the Geologic Assessment will be assessed to review likely karst features and caves in the project area, in order to conclude the potential for encountering listed karst species. If vital, karst feature surveys or other threatened/endangered species surveys would be done under an additional scope and budget. Preparation of a participation application and submittal to the WCCF for coverage under the Williamson County Regional HCP would be combined with and completed under the adjacent Williams Drive at Rivery turn lane project. A.4 Hazardous Materials A database search of previously recorded hazardous material sites in the project area will be conducted and a summary incorporated into the environmental report. During field visits, project environmental staff will identify sites within and near the project corridor that may pose a potential hazardous materials risk. A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment is not included in this Scope. A.5 Environmental Tech Memo Preparation/Comment Response Page 42 of 104 Engineering Service Agreement Exhibit B Page 5 of 12 This task includes the writing and production of a complete environmental technical memorandum, as well as revisions in response to comments from the City. Only generalized, preliminary mitigation measures will be presented where adverse impacts may potentially occur; detailed mitigation plans are not part of this Scope of Services. This task includes the submittal of five (5) unbound copies of the draft environmental tech memo for City review and 5 unbound copies of the revised final tech memo. B. Assumptions 1. All necessary rights-of-entry will be secured by the City. 2. This scope assumes that no formal public involvement opportunities will be held for the proposed improvements. 3. Assumes that a tech memo (for a project using only local {City} funds) would be adequate, and no NEPA document (TxDOT EA or Categorical Exclusion) would be required by TxDOT reviewers. C. Exclusions 1. The following tasks are not covered in this scope of work and may or may not be necessary. If deemed necessary, these tasks could be conducted under a separate or supplemental work authorization. 2. Preparation of a NEPA document (CatEx, Environmental Assessment, or EIS); 3. Formal Section 10(a) Endangered Species Act consultation, including preparation of a stand-alone Biological Assessment, USFWS consultation or completion of Williamson County Regional HCP coordination; 4. Presence/absence surveys for endangered species; 5. Construction phase services, including preparation of Environmental Permits, Issues and Commitments (EPIC) sheets; 6. Work extending beyond the specified limits of the project at the time of this work order; 7. Any Section 404 permit preparation or agency correspondence; 8. Hazardous materials Phase I & Phase II ESAs; 9. Reconnaissance or intensive historic structures surveys, archeological surveys or assessments of eligibility, or management recommendations for any historic structures; 10. Archeological survey, site testing, or data recovery; 11. Participation in any public involvement meeting or activity; and 12. Litigation support. 2. Environmental Tech Memo Preparation for TxDOT Facility The project involves improvements at the intersection of Williams Drive at Rivery. TxDOT Categorical Exclusion (CE) documentation is anticipated to be required. A Scope Development Tool will be completed. In anticipation of TxDOT Environmental Review, the proposed deliverables will comply with the latest guidance on contents and format available from TxDOT. A. Land Use, Social and Economic Considerations/Socioeconomic Technical Report: Project planners will map land use in the project area and collect socioeconomic data from the U.S. Census and the Texas Workforce Commission to determine Page 43 of 104 Engineering Service Agreement Exhibit B Page 6 of 12 existing conditions and potential impacts on the community in the project study area. Environmental Justice and Limited English Proficiency considerations will be addressed with regard to the latest guidance from TxDOT and summarized in a brief technical report. B. Noise Analysis: A noise analysis using TNM modeling software is not anticipated based on the scope of proposed improvements. If a noise analysis or barrier analysis is needed, an additional scope and fee estimate would be required. C. Cultural Resources - Historic Structures: A Project Coordination Request for TxDOT review would be prepared to determine whether or not a Historic Resources Survey Report is required for this project. If an HRSR is required, it would be completed under a separate scope and fee estimate. D. Cultural Resources - Archeology: Archival research will be performed in the electronic and mapping files of the Texas Historical Commission (THC) Atlas Sites database, the Texas Archeological Research Laboratory (TARL), and/or any other relevant archives for information on previous cultural resource investigations conducted and previously recorded sites and historic properties in the vicinity of the project’s Area of Potential Effect (APE). Project archeologists will prepare an Archeological Resources Background Study for submittal to TxDOT. Based on the findings of the Background Study, it will be determined whether or not an archeological survey is required. If a survey is required, it would be completed under an additional scope and budget. E. Geologic Assessment: A Geologic Assessment will be prepared. The site is located within the Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone. F. Jurisdictional Waters Determination/Water Technical Memo Data will be collected on surface water streams and other existing water resources and the potential for impacts on water features/quality during construction and from the completed facility. The 100-year flood plain, as delineated by FEMA, will be identified and the impacts of the proposed project will be assessed. Wetlands and Other Waters of the U.S. Limits of jurisdictional waters in the project area will be determined and related permit requirements will be documented. It is assumed that no more than a Nationwide Permit without Pre-Construction Notification would be required for this project. Should Pre-Construction Notification or Individual Permit be required for the project (due to exceeding permit thresholds or impacting wetlands), it would be prepared under an additional scope and fee estimate. G. Biological Evaluation Form: This project area appears to be within Karst Zone 1 and 2 habitat. A description of existing vegetation/wildlife habitat will be included; lists of threatened/endangered species from Texas Parks and Wildlife Department and Page 44 of 104 Engineering Service Agreement Exhibit B Page 7 of 12 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service will be provided; and that no potential Threatened/Endangered species habitat exists within the right-of-way will be confirmed. No presence/absence surveys are included in this scope and fee (would be completed under additional fee if required). H. Hazardous Materials Investigation (Database Search, Field Visit, Initial Site Assessment [ISA]): A database search according to ASTM Standards will be obtained for the project area; a field investigation (where right-of-entry is granted) will be conducted; and the potential for impacting hazardous materials sites will be discussed in an ISA technical memo. I. Parklands: The field investigation will determine whether or not parklands exist within the project area. No Section 4(f) or Section 6(f) analysis is anticipated or included in the fee at this stage. J. EPIC Sheets and Construction Impacts: Provide information to help complete the EPIC sheet based on environmental investigations. Construction impacts will be generally described along with recommended BMPs. K. Environmental Constraints Mapping: GIS mapping will be conducted to include (as necessary) floodplain information from FEMA, stream and water feature information from NHD and NWI, cultural data, threatened and endangered species data, vegetation impacts, land use, cultural resources, and census data. L. Agency coordination (identification of needed permits only): A Williamson County Regional Habitat Conservation Plan participation application will be prepared for submittal to the Williamson County Conservation Foundation (WCCF), which will include the area encompassed by the Rivery Blvd improvements. No direct agency coordination is proposed. M. Public Involvement Support: Should public involvement tasks be needed those tasks would be performed under an additional scope and fee estimate. DELIVERABLES • Scope Development Tool (electronic submittal); • Environmental Constraints Technical Memoranda (electronic submittal) to support a CE determination (electronic submittals)– note that various technical memoranda will be required for submittal to TxDOT. These include a Biological Evaluation Form, Hazardous Materials ISA, Historic Resources PCR, Archeological Background Study, Socioeconomic Technical Report and Water Resources Technical Report. EXCLUSIONS The following items are not included but could be added for an additional scope and fee estimate: • Historic Resources Survey Report Page 45 of 104 Engineering Service Agreement Exhibit B Page 8 of 12 • Archeological Pedestrian Survey, Testing or Data Recovery • Threatened/Endangered Species Surveys • WPAP • Full Phase I ESA for Hazardous Materials • Noise assessment (TNM) or barrier analysis • Air Quality Analysis • Public Meeting/Hearing • Full Section 4(f) or 6(f) Analysis • USACE Permitting Requiring Direct agency coordination (JD, PCN, IP) I. Preliminary Design 1. Based upon the recommendations of the Traffic Engineering tasks, and upon City project manager’s agreement and direction, prepare preliminary construction plans. Prepare the ensuing sheets (11” X 17”) at the engineering scale indicated: a. Cover Sheet b. General Notes Sheet c. Project layout control sheet(s). Scale 1” = 100’. d. Quantity sheet (sheet by sheet breakdown of all material and work quantities). e. Typical sections and detail sheets. f. Construction phasing and traffic control sheets. Scale 1” = 40’. g. Roadway (Turn Lane) improvements plan and profile sheets. Scale 1” = 20’H; 1” = 5’V. h. Intersection Layouts. Scale 1” = 20’ i. Water/Sewer Utility Relocation/Adjustment Plans. Scale 1” = 20’ j. Drainage area maps (with drainage calculations) for street/drainage improvements. Scale 1” = 100’. k. Storm drain improvements plan and profile sheets. Scale 1” = 20’H; 1” = 5’V. l. Water quality improvements related to compliance with TCEQ WPAP requirements. m. Traffic signal modifications prepared to TxDOT standards. Scale 1” = 20’ n. Prepare list of structural design items (controller and signal mast foundations; retaining wall; etc.). o. SWPPP sheets meeting EPA requirements. Scale 1” = 40’. p. Final pavement marking and signage plan sheets. Scale 1” = 40’. q. Cross-sections. Scale 1” = 20’H; 1” = 2’V. The required information can be combined on sheets if the information can be clearly shown and is approved by the City’s project manager. 2. Coordinate with the affected utilities (e.g. water, gas, electric, cable TV, and telephone) to obtain accurate information for the location of their facilities. 3. Prepare preliminary specifications based on the City’s Construction Specifications and Standards. The preliminary specifications will include, at a minimum, a table of contents for the project manual that clearly identifies specifications that will be modified from the standard for the project. Page 46 of 104 Engineering Service Agreement Exhibit B Page 9 of 12 4. Prepare an estimate of construction quantities and develop the preliminary opinion of probable construction cost. 5. Prepare Preliminary Engineering Report (PER) for Rivery Blvd. turn lane locations (Wolf Ranch Pkwy.; Hintz Rd., and; Williams Dr.). PER will consolidate other documents and calculations, including other technical reports and estimate, to support final design phase. 6. Submit two sets of preliminary plans and one (1) set of the outline of technical specifications and preliminary opinion of probable construction cost to the City project manager for review. 7. Distribute the preliminary plans sets to the local utility companies and obtain information regarding potential conflicts based on these plans. 8. Meet with City staff to discuss comments on the preliminary plans, specifications and opinion of probable construction cost for the Project. 9. On the forms provided by the City, submit with the monthly requests for payment, a monthly report of progress on the Project. 10. Williams Dr. eastbound right turn to Rivery Blvd.: a. Prepare PER to document preceding items, including environmental analysis associated with this segment only; b. This concludes engineer’s services for this portion of project scope. No additional work is intended without further authorization from City. 11. Coordinate with TCEQ Region 11 Staff regarding proposed improvements and proposed modification to WPAP. 12. Perform Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) review of preceding items. J. Final Design 1. Revise preliminary plans incorporating comments from City staff. 2. Incorporate comments from the utility companies. 3. Finalize construction plans for proposed improvements. a. Incorporate standard details into the construction plans and prepare additional details as required (TxDOT Standards will be primary source). 4. Prepare and submit application and attendant forms (TCEQ-0590, etc.) for WPAP Modification to TCEQ Region 11 for review and approval. 5. Coordinate with affected utilities to relocate their facilities. 6. Finalize special technical specifications and special conditions (if any). Page 47 of 104 Engineering Service Agreement Exhibit B Page 10 of 12 7. Take off final construction quantities and prepare final construction cost estimates. 8. Submit three (3) sets of pre-final plans and one (1) set of special technical specifications, draft bid schedule and final opinion of probable construction cost. 9. Incorporate City, TCEQ and TxDOT final comments into the plans and bid documents. 10. Submit three (3) sets of final black line prints, three (3) bound copies of the bid documents and one (1) CD-ROM in PDF format containing the bid documents to the City project manager. 11. Attend a utility coordination meeting to start relocation of affected utilities. Distribute copy of final plans and proposed schedule for bid letting and construction to all affected utilities. 12. Submit one (1) set of final black line prints and one (1) bound copy of bid documents to the City’s designated testing laboratory. 13. Obtain TxDOT approval for proposed intersection/signal modifications at Williams Dr. 14. Perform Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) review of preceding items. 15. Register the project with TDLR and perform plan review of the project construction documents for compliance with Texas Accessibility Standards (TAS). K. Bid Phase Services 1. Assist the City in advertising for bids. This will include e-mailing “Invitation to Bid” to contractors experienced in this type of construction. Publication of the “Notice to Bidders” will be completed by the City. 2. Attend a pre-bid conference at the City offices. 3. Answer prospective bidder’s questions prior to submittal of bids. 4. Prepare and issue addendum(a) prior to submittal of bids. 5. Assist during the bid opening and provide a bid tabulation in Excel format. 6. Provide the bid tabulation to the City and contractors who submitted bids. 7. Notify the City of any discrepancies in any of the bids. 8. Obtain the following information from the lowest and second lowest bidder: a. Past work history. b. Physical resources to complete the project. Page 48 of 104 Engineering Service Agreement Exhibit B Page 11 of 12 9. Formulate an opinion from the information received and submit, to the City, a written summary of the opinion and recommendation of award of construction contract. 10. After award of the contract for construction, furnish one (1) CD containing PDF files of prints of the final plans, specifications and contract documents to the City for use by the City and Contractor during construction. The documents shall be conformed to incorporate all addenda issued during the bidding phase. 11. Provide one set of plans to each of the utility companies (GUS, AT&T, Atmos, Time-Warner and all other identified utilities). 12. This scope assumes this service will be done twice to construct the entirety of the improvements developed under this scope of services. L. Construction Phase Services 1. Assist City staff in conducting the pre-construction conference. 2. Upon request by the City, attend coordination meetings with Contractor, testing laboratories, utilities, and City representatives to discuss construction or coordination issues, problems, design interpretations, progress, and any other required coordination (assume 4). 3. Upon request by the City, provide written responses to requests for information or clarification to City or Contractor (assume 2). 4. Prepare plan and quantity revisions as required for change orders as they pertain to the original scope of work. The City will prepare the actual change orders (assume 1). 5. Review and provide recommendation of approval for Contractor Applications for Payment (assume 4). 6. Upon request by the City, accompany the City during the final inspection of the project. 7. Integrate changes into the construction drawings as noted by Contractor and City. 8. Perform final inspection of project upon completion for compliance with TAS. 9. Prepare construction “Record Drawings” based upon mark-ups and data provided by the City’s on-site representative and Contractor construction record data. Submit one (1) blackline set of record drawings to the City project manager and one (1) CD-ROM disk containing scanned images of the final “as constructed” project drawings (with “record drawing” stamps bearing the signature of the Engineer and date). The drawings shall be scanned 1:1 as Group 4 TIF files at a minimum resolution of 200 dots per inch and a maximum resolution of 400 dots per inch. The TIF files shall be legible and shall include any post processing that may be required to enhance the image quality (e.g. de-speckling, de-shading, de- skewing, etc.) Each file shall be named in numeric order. Page 49 of 104 Engineering Service Agreement Exhibit B Page 12 of 12 10. This scope also assumes this service will be done twice to construct the entirety of the improvements developed under this scope of services. 11. Coordinate Rivery Blvd. turn lane modifications to Williams Dr. with TxDOT. SPECIAL SERVICES A. Right-of-Way and Easement Surveying 1. Prepare a metes and bounds description based upon title commitments and 8-1/2” X 11” exhibit for nine (9) parcels on a per tract basis. Deliver three (3) reviewed and sealed originals to the City project manager for City ROW or easements. 2. Set new iron pins at all new corners, PC’s and PT’s of new right-of-way. ADDITIONAL SERVICES The following items are specifically excluded from this scope of work, but can be provided for an Additional Service: 1. Each of the prior locations is intended to be a non-channelized right-turn lane. 2. Providing an on-site representative during construction. 3. Environmental impact statements and assessments. 4. The fee for a single TCEQ WPAP modification permit is estimated in the attached fee estimate. Any additional fees for other permits or advertising will be paid by Engineer, and reimbursed by the City. Any such amount will be documented to support claims for reimbursement. 5. Certification that work is in accordance with plans and specifications. 6. Landscape architecture. 7. Flood plain reclamation plans. 8. Title searches, boundary surveys, or property surveys except as defined in the scope of services. 9. Trench safety designs. 10. Services in connection with condemnation. 11. Revisions and/or change orders as a result of revisions to the scope after completion of final design (unless to correct errors on the plans). 12. Traffic engineering report or study, other than scope items identified previously. 13. Computer modeling except as defined in the scope of services. 14. Scope assumes a modification to an existing WPAP is to be prepared. If a new WPAP is required, an additional scope and fee estimate will be provided. Page 50 of 104 Owner’s Responsibilities Exhibit C Page 1 of 1 EXHIBIT C SCHEDULE OF OWNER’S RESPONSIBILITIES Rivery Boulevard T.I.A Improvements CITY’S RESPONSIBILITIES 1. CITY will designate a single representative to act on its behalf, with respect to the project, who shall examine documents submitted by the ENGINEER and, to the extent allowed by law, shall render decisions pertaining thereto promptly to avoid unreasonable delay in the progress of the ENGINEER’s services. 2. All of the City’s plat, easement and construction plan files, as well as CAD files (including traffic signals at Wolf Ranch Parkway and Williams Drive), related to the Project will be made available for use. CITY will provide copies at no cost. If easement information is not available within the City, ENGINEER will need to obtain that information from Williamson County. 3. CITY will provide recorded WPAP documents for facilities related to Rivery Boulevard, and surrounding development. 4. CITY will provide the City’s standard construction contract documents. 5. CITY will solicit and obtain right-of-entry from affected properties for survey and SUE services needs. 6. CITY will provide existing Synchro (8) model and appropriate supporting input data files from Summit at Rivery TIA Update prepared by Alliance Transportation Group dated October 31, 2013 to perform modeling of proposed intersection improvements locations. Page 51 of 104 Payments to Engineer Exhibit D Page 1 of 1 EXHIBIT D PAYMENTS TO ENGINEER FOR SERVICES AND REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES Rivery Boulevard T.I.A Improvements ITEM FEE AMOUNT B. Project Management $14,190 C. Research & Data Collection $2,535 D. Design Survey $16,800 E. Subsurface Utility Engineering $28,650 F. ROW & Esm’t. Rqmts. (assumes 9 parcels) $9,000 G. Traffic Engineering $2,504 H. Environmental Services $27,747 I. Preliminary Design $33,769 J. Final Design $65,491 K. Bid Phase Services $6,435 L. Construction Phase Services $9,909 K (2). Bid Phase Services (2) $6,435 L (2). Construction Phase Services (2) $9,909 Engineering Services Subtotal: $233,374 Reimbursable Expenses $6,426 TOTAL AMOUNT: $239,800 Page 52 of 104 Ta s k L e v e l P r i n c i p a l P M  II S r .  En g r P E E I T S r .  Te c h  II C A D  Op A d m i n S L  I T a s k  Fe e Ra t e $1 9 5 $ 1 6 0 $ 1 5 0 $ 1 3 5 $ 1 0 0 $ 1 0 5 $ 7 0 $ 6 5 $ 1 0 B.  Pr o j e c t  Ma n a g e m e n t 0 5 9 0 1 4 0 0 0 4 4 0 $ 1 4 , 1 9 0 C.  Re s e a r c h  & Da t a  Co l l e c t 03 3 5 8 0 0 2 0 $2 , 5 3 5 D.  De s i g n  Su r v e y $1 6 , 8 0 0 E.  Su b s u r f a c e  Ut i l i t y  En g r . $2 8 , 6 5 0 F.  RO W  & Es m t  Rq m t s $9 , 0 0 0 G.  Tr a f f i c  En g i n e e r i n g 1 2 3 1 0 00 0 1 1 3 $2 , 5 0 4 H.  En v i r o n m e n t a l  Se r v i c e s $2 7 , 7 4 7 I.  Pr e l i m  De s i g n 2 2 5 . 5 4 4 1 1 3 7 4 7 0 1 0 1 2 2 $ 3 3 , 7 6 9 J.  Fi n a l  De s i g n 4 4 3 8 4 1 9 9 1 3 1 2 5 0 1 0 2 7 8 $ 6 5 , 4 9 1 K.  Bi d  Ph a s e  Se r v i c e s 1 1 3 4 2 1 40 0 5 0 $6 , 4 3 5 L.  Co n s t r .  Ph a s e  Sv c s . 0 1 9 8 3 1 24 0 5 1 2 $9 , 9 0 9 K.  Bi d  Ph a s e  Se r v i c e s  (2) 1 1 3 4 2 1 4 0 0 5 0 $6 , 4 3 5 L.  Co n s t r .  Ph a s e  Sv c s .  (2) 0 1 9 8 3 1 2 4 0 5 1 2 $9 , 9 0 9 $2 3 3 , 3 7 4 : S U B T O T A L Re i m b u r s a b l e  Ex p e n s e s $6 , 4 2 6 $2 3 9 , 8 0 0 : T O T A L  FE E Ho u r  Su m s : 9 1 9 6 . 5 1 5 8 4 4 5 4 0 1 8 0 0 8 7 4 3 7 La b o r  Su b ‐To t a l s : $ 1 , 7 5 5 $ 3 1 , 4 4 0 $ 2 3 , 7 0 0 $ 6 0 , 0 7 5 $ 4 , 0 0 0 $ 1 8 , 9 0 0 $ 0 $ 5 , 6 5 5 $ 4 , 1 5 2 $ 1 4 9 , 6 7 7 : S U B T O T A L CI T Y  OF  GE O R G E T O W N :  RI V E R Y  BL V D .  TI A  IM P R O V E M E N T S  ‐   EN G I N E E R I N G  SE R V I C E S EX H I B I T  D ‐   DE T A I L Page 53 of 104 M & S ENGINEERING CIVIL l ELECTRICAL l STRUCTURAL l MEP WWW.MSENGR.COM 2015 Engineering Rate Schedule Date: April 21, 2015 The following rate schedule is in effect for the 2015 calendar year and will be reviewed annually for appropriate changes as may be required. 1 Includes AutoCAD, MicroStation, L-Pile, SAG10 and other common licensed software packages 2 Includes PLS-CADD, Bently Systems, e-tap and other premium licensed software packages 3 Rates are inclusive of all surveying equipment, including stakes, marking paints, and other consumable items required. Special request items such as T -posts, 36” Laths, concrete monuments, etc. will be billed on a cost plus 15% basis. other premium licensed software packages Labor Classification 2015 Billing Rate Principal Engineer $195.00 Senior Engineer/RPLS $150.00 Project Engineer $135.00 Technical Specialist $125.00 Engineer or Surveyor in Training (EIT or SIT) $100.00 Project Manager II $160.00 Project Manager I $150.00 Senior Technician III $115.00 Senior Technician II $105.00 Senior Technician I $95.00 Project Technician II $85.00 Project Technician I $80.00 Technician II $75.00 Technician I $70.00 Senior CAD Operator $80.00 CAD Operator $70.00 Administrative II $75.00 Administrative I $65.00 Software Level I 1 $9.50 Software Level II 2 $19.50 2 –Person Construction Staking Crew $135.00 3 – Person Construction Staking Crew $165.00 Page 54 of 104 City of Georgetown, Texas Transportation Enhancement Corp July 20, 2016 SUBJECT: Cons id eration and pos s ible ac tion to ap p rove Task Order CPY-16-001 with CP &Y, Inc., o f Aus tin, Texas , fo r p ro fes s io nal engineering s ervic es related to the final engineering design for c o nstruc tion p lans , s p ecific ations and estimate for the Rab b it Hill Road Improvements Projec t from Westingho us e R o ad to north o f S. C learview Drive in the amo unt o f $ $425,700.00. – Bill Dryd en, P.E., Transportation Engineer and Edward G . Polas ek, AICP, Trans p o rtation S ervic es Directo r. ITEM SUMMARY: In November 2014, the GTEC Bo ard approved a bud get amend ment in the amo unt of $10,638,371.60 autho rizing a projec t to extend Mays S treet fro m Teravista P arkway to no rth of Wes tingho use R o ad . The City engaged the firm of C P&Y, Inc., of Austin, Texas , to d evelo p the p lans , s p ecific ations and estimate (PS &E) fo r the p o rtion o f Mays S treet b etween Bass P ro Drive/Teravis ta Parkway and Wes tingho use Ro ad . The C ity p ro p o s es to c o ntinue thos e roadway improvements from Wes tingho use Ro ad to no rth o f S. Clearview Drive and has selec ted CP&Y to develop PS&E for this p o rtion of improvements . The attac hed Tas k Order C PY-16-001 propos es provid e pro fes s io nal engineering s ervic es to d etermine additio nal rights-of-way req uired, develo p nec es s ary ROW d o cuments and co mp lete PS&E, read y for cons tructio n in an amount o f $425,700.00. Staff has reviewed and c onc urs with the S cope of Services and Man Ho urs (fee) required for this work. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff rec ommend s approval of Tas k Ord er CPY-16-001 with CP&Y, Inc., o f Aus tin, Texas , for p ro fes s io nal engineering s ervices related to the final engineering d es ign for cons tructio n p lans , s p ecific ations and estimate for the Rab b it Hill Road Improvements Projec t from Westingho us e R o ad to north o f S. Clearview Drive in the amount of $ $425,700.00. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Funding for the projec t will be reimb ursed fro m the S o uth Geo rgeto wn T IRZ c reated in the Wes tingho use R o ad area which includ es this portio n o f Rab b it Hill Road. Funding for the Pro jec t is availab le in the amended FY 2014-2015 GTEC b udget. The financ ial analys is wo rks heet is attached . SUBMITTED BY: Bill Dryden, P.E.; Trans portation Engineer ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Financial Analys is Works heet Backup Material Propos ed Tas k Order CPY-16-001 with Attachments Backup Material Page 55 of 104 Page 56 of 104 PROJECT No.DATE: PROJECT NAME: 5RQ 7/14/2016 Division/Department: Director Approval EGP 7/14/2016 Prepared By:Finance Approval TOTAL ANNUAL BUDGET 4,797,131.76 (Current year only) Actual Cost Agenda Total Spent Encumbrance Item & Encumbered % Annual (A) before agenda item (B)(A + B) Budget Consulting (CPY-16-001)425,700.00 425,700.00 9% Right of Way 0.00 0% Construction 0.00 0% Other Costs (CMT)0.00 0% Total Current Year Costs 0.00 425,700.00 425,700.00 Approved GENERAL LEDGER ACCOUNT NUMBER CY Budget 400-9-0980-90-060 4,797,131.76 Total Budget 4,797,131.76 TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET 4,797,131.76 (includes all previous yrs.) Prior Years Current Year Total Project % Total Spent/Encumbered Costs Costs Budget Consulting 0.00 425,700.00 425,700.00 9% Right of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% Other Costs 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% Total Project Costs 0.00 425,700.00 425,700.00 Transportation Services GTEC - Budgetary and Financial Analysis Worksheet Comments: TIRZ Funded - Extension of Mays Street north of Westinghouse Road Mays Street Extension PS&E Design Bill Dryden, Transportation Engineer Rabbit Hill Road Improvem'ts Project Page 57 of 104 TASK ORDER Georgetown – Revised 3.11 EJCDC E-505 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Engineer Professional Services—Task Order Edition Copyright ©2004 National Society of Professional Engineers for EJCDC. All rights reserved. Attachment 1 – Task Order Form Page 1 of 4 Task Order In accordance with paragraph 1.01 of the Master Services Agreement between Owner and CP & Y, Inc. (“Engineer”) for Professional Services – Task Order Edition, dated November 20, 2013, ("Agreement"), Owner and Engineer agree as follows: 1. Specific Project Data A. Title: Rabbit Hill Road Improvements (Westinghouse Road to North of S. Clearview Dr.) B. Description: Reconstruct Rabbit Hill Road from Westinghouse Road northward to S. Clearview Dr. Widening along Westinghouse Road will also be included in the schematic for additional turning lanes to/from Westinghouse Road. The project length along the anticipated alignment is approximately 0.75 miles. C. City of Georgetown Project Number: 5RQ D. City of Georgetown General Ledger Account No.: 400-9-0980-90-064 E. City of Georgetown Purchase Order No.: F. Master Services Agreement, Contract Number: 2013-722-MSA 2. Services of Engineer See the attached Scope of Services for a detailed description of services to be provided to Owner by Engineer. 3. Owner's Responsibilities Owner shall have those responsibilities set forth in the Agreement subject to the following: • Provide timely review comments to plan reviews and project scope changes. • Estimated third-party fees for this project are listed below, and are included in the compensation amount detailed in Section 5. The City shall be responsible for any permitting and third-party review fees not listed below. o None 4. Times for Rendering Services Engineer shall perform the work stated above according to the schedule below. All times are from the date Notice to Proceed from Owner, or the previous phase, as appropriate. Phase Completion Date Design Phase Seven (7) Months Bidding Phase One (1) Month Construction Phase Twelve (12) Months Task Order No. CPY-16-001, consisting of __37_ pages. Page 58 of 104 TASK ORDER Georgetown – Revised 3.11 EJCDC E-505 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Engineer Professional Services—Task Order Edition Copyright ©2004 National Society of Professional Engineers for EJCDC. All rights reserved. Attachment 1 – Task Order Form Page 2 of 4 5. Payments to Engineer A. Owner shall pay Engineer for services rendered as follows: Category of Services Compensation Method (See Attached Fee Proposal) Lump Sum or Not to Exceed Amount of Compensation for Services Survey, Design, Bidding Phase, & Construction Phase Administration Lump Sum $425,700.00 Total Compensation $425,700.00 B. The terms of payment are set forth in Article 4 of the Agreement unless modified in this Task Order. 6. Consultants: A. Prime consultant is CP&Y, Inc. B. Subconsulants include: • CORSAIR • SWCA • The Wallace Group (A CP&Y Company) 7. Other Modifications to Agreement: None. 8. Attachments: A. Exhibit A – Project Location Map. B. Exhibit B – Scope of Services 1. Attachment A – Schedule of Services C. Exhibit C – Owners Responsibilities D. Exhibit D – Fee Proposal 9. Documents Incorporated By Reference: The Agreement effective November 20, 2013. Page 59 of 104 TASK ORDER Georgetown – Revised 3.11 EJCDC E-505 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Engineer Professional Services—Task Order Edition Copyright ©2004 National Society of Professional Engineers for EJCDC. All rights reserved. Attachment 1 – Task Order Form Page 3 of 4 Terms and Conditions: Execution of this Task Order by Owner and Engineer shall make it subject to the terms and conditions of the Agreement (as modified above), which Agreement is incorporated by this reference. Engineer is authorized to begin performance upon its receipt of a copy of this Task Order signed by Owner. The Effective Date of this Task Order is , 2016. OWNER: City of Georgetown ENGINEER: CP&Y, Inc. By: By: Name: Dale Ross Name: James (J.J.) Roohms, P.E. Title: Mayor Title: Chief Operating Officer Engineer License or Firm’s Certificate No. F-1741 State of: Texas Date: Date: ATTEST: ____________________________________ Shelley Nowling, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM ONLY BY CITY ATTORNEY AND BY CITY COUNCIL MARCH 8, 2011, AGENDA ITEM “P” APPROVED AS TO FORM VERIFIED: ________________________________________ Vickie Graff, CPPO, CTPM Contract Coordinator STATE OF TEXAS § CORPORATE COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON § ACKNOWLEDGEMENT On this day of , 2014, James (J.J.) Roohms personally appeared before me and proved to me through satisfactory evidence of identification to be the person who signed this document in my presence. [SEAL] ________________________________________ Notary Public My Commission Expires:____________________ Page 60 of 104 TASK ORDER Georgetown – Revised 3.11 EJCDC E-505 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Engineer Professional Services—Task Order Edition Copyright ©2004 National Society of Professional Engineers for EJCDC. All rights reserved. Attachment 1 – Task Order Form Page 4 of 4 Owner: Engineer: Designated Representative For Task Order: Designated Representative For Task Order: Name: Bill Dryden, P.E. Name: Anthony Serda, P.E. Title: Transportation Engineer Title: Department Manager Address: 300-1 Industrial Ave. Address: 13809 Research Blvd., Suite 300 Georgetown, TX 78626 Austin, TX 78750 E-Mail: Bill.Dryden@georgetown.org E-Mail: aserda@cpyi.com Phone: (512) 930-8096 Phone: (512) 241-2228 Fax: (512) 930-3559 Fax: (512) 349-0727 Page 61 of 104 W e s ti n g h o u s e R d Project Li mit Project Limit S m ith B ra n c h WestForkSmithBranch McNuttCreek Project Locat io n W i l l i a m s o n C o u n t y£¤18 3 UV130 §¨¦35UV195 UV45 UV95 UV29 UV95 Exhibit A: Location MapRabbit Hill Road Project Location Westinghouse Rd. to S. Clearview Dr.H 0 1,000 2,00 0500Feet Basemap: ESRI World Stre etsProject Lim itsPage 62 of 104 Exhibit B CP&Y, Inc. 7/14/2016 1 of 17 EXHIBIT B Rabbit Hill Road Improvements  (Westinghouse Road to North of S. Clearview Dr.)  SCOPE OF SERVICES The Project will widen the existing Rabbit Hill Road from a 2‐lane rural roadway to a 4‐lane urban  collector from Westinghouse Road to South Clearview Drive in Georgetown.  This scope of work  consists of preparing the preliminary schematic to determine the preferred alignment and Plans,  Specifications and Estimates (PS&E).  There will also be additional turning lanes to/from Westinghouse  Road.  (The signal will have been installed with Mays Street; may require some additional heads and/or  timing modifications)  The project length along the anticipated alignment is approximately 0.75 miles.  Design services for this project will be performed in accordance with the latest available City of  Georgetown manuals, guidelines and standards.  Where City standards do not exist, appropriate  TxDOT and/or AASHTO guidelines may be followed.  The project shall consist of a 4‐lane undivided  collector with curb and gutter, sidewalks, drainage facilities, street lighting.  The Engineer shall provide  the necessary engineering and technical services for the completion of public involvement, permitting,  surveying and mapping, identification of utility conflicts, coordination with utility companies,  preparation of PS&E, bid phase services and construction phase services.  The final major deliverable  for this phase will be detailed PS&E suitable for bidding and construction.  Agency abbreviations are as follows:  City of Georgetown (City), Williamson County (County), Texas Department of Transportation  (TxDOT), Texas Department of Transportation Environmental Division (TxDOT‐ENV), Federal  Highway Administration (FWHA), Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO),  Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP), Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP),  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Texas Historical Commission (THC), National Register of  Historical Places (NRHP), Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Texas Commission on  Environmental Quality (TCEQ).  The tasks and products are more fully described in the following TASK OUTLINE. TASK OUTLINE I. SOCIAL, ECONOMIC & ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environmental Reports will be in accordance with 43 Texas Administrative Code (TAC) 2.40‐2.51,  Council on Environmental Quality Regulations (40 CFR 1500‐1508), Code of Federal Regulations,  Title 23, Part 771, the FHWA Technical Advisory T6640.8A, and Highway Design Operations and  Procedures Manual, Part II‐B.  An Environmental Constraints Memorandum will be prepared for  the proposed project.  A. RIGHT‐OF‐ENTRY SERVICES (provided by CP&Y, Inc.)  1. Perform property ownership research utilizing the Williamson County Appraisal District  records (Tax Maps and Ownership Records) and compile a list (Excel Spreadsheet) of  Page 63 of 104 Exhibit B CP&Y, Inc. 7/14/2016 2 of 17 landowners for distribution of right of entry letters.  Obtain “right‐of‐entry” by signed letter  from the owner of each of the subject properties.  Also, contact property owners in advance of  field surveys or to address specific property owner concerns about the work to be performed or  being performed.  This scope anticipates that the City will handle problems regarding  landowners that refuse to grant right‐of‐entry or are otherwise hostile with respect to the  completion of this scope of services.  Record and report results of mailings for future action.   Landowner contacts will be recorded and provided to the Client.  B. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS ANALYSIS (provided by CP&Y, Inc.)  1. OBTAIN EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS DATA  Perform a desktop review of environmental constraints of the proposed study area. Constraints  to be identified include:  (a) Cemeteries  (b) Parks  (c) Soils  (d) Properties on the National Register of Historic Places  (e) Archeological sites  (f) Hazardous material sites  (g) Data from the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department’s Natural Diversity Database  (h) United States Fish and Wildlife Serviceʹs Critical Habitat Mapper  (i) National Wetland Inventory Data  (j) Floodplains  (k) National Hydrography Dataset  (l) Land Uses identified through aerial photo interpretation    2. FIELD RECONNAISSANCE (provided by CP&Y, Inc.)  Conduct a field reconnaissance of the study area to verify and update the information identified  through the desktop review.   3. PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS MAP (provided by CP&Y, Inc.)  Prepare a preliminary environmental constraints map of the study area on digital  orthophotography using GIS.  The map shall include information from the desktop review and  additional data obtained from the field reconnaissance.   4. TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM (provided by CP&Y, Inc.)  A technical memorandum describing environmental constraints within the study area will be  prepared.  The technical memorandum will include the above‐mentioned items and the  environmental constraints map will be included as an appendix. This information shall be  provided to the project design team to assist in the development of alignment alternatives.  5. AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN OR AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT (provided by  SWCA)  Task 1 – Cultural Resources  Page 64 of 104 Exhibit B CP&Y, Inc. 7/14/2016 3 of 17 Rabbit Hill Road is owned by the City of Georgetown (a political subdivision of the State of  Texas); therefore, the planned project is subject to review under the ACT for cultural resources.  Should any U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Section 404 permitting be required then the  project would also be subject to review under Section 106 of the NHPA. The proposed scope of  work includes a background cultural resources review, obtaining a Texas Antiquities Permit,  conducting an intensive pedestrian cultural resources survey, and producing a report of the  results of investigations for the reviewing agency (the Texas Historical Commission [THC]).  Should any USACE permitting be required, the report will also be suitable for submittal to the  USACE for their review.  (a) Background Review, Antiquities Permit, and Agency Coordination SWCA will begin with a background cultural resources literature and records search of the  project area. For this research, SWCA will search the Texas  Archeological Sites Atlas  (Atlas)  online database for any previously recorded surveys and historic or prehistoric archaeological  sites located in or near the project area. If needed, an SWCA archaeologist will search site files,  records, and maps files housed at the Texas  Archeological Research Laboratory (TARL) and the  THC Library. In addition to identifying previously recorded archaeological sites, the Atlas   review will identify NRHP properties, SALs, Official Texas  Historical Markers, Recorded Texas   Historic Landmarks, cemeteries, and local neighborhood surveys. This task will allow SWCA to  identify any areas within the project area that have the potential to contain significant,  undocumented cultural resources. As part of the review, an SWCA archaeologist will examine  the Texas  Department of Transportation Historic Overlay, a mapping/geographic information  system (GIS) database with historic maps and resource information covering most portion of  the state. SWCA will also examine the level of previous disturbances from residential and  commercial development, types of soils present, and any obvious standing structures greater  than 45 years in age that appear on U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) topographic maps. With  this  information, SWCA will be able to evaluate archaeological potential prior to performing  fieldwork.   Because the project involves land owned by the City of Georgetown, a political subdivision of  the state, any archaeological field investigations will require a Texas Antiquities Permit.  SWCA’s Principal Investigator will prepare the permit application and submit it to CP&Y and  the City of Georgetown for review and signatures. Once all signatures are obtained, the  application will be submitted to the THC. The THC has up to 30 days to review and issue a  permit for the investigations. As part of the application process, SWCA will incorporate the  results of a thorough background archaeological literature and records search of the project  area. Also as part of this task, SWCA will make all logistical preparations for the fieldwork and  establish project management protocols.   (b) Field Investigations   SWCA will conduct archaeological investigations along the entire Rabbit Hill Road  improvement project area within the existing and proposed ROW. The survey will be of  sufficient intensity to determine the nature, extent, and, if possible, potential significance of  cultural resources located within the proposed project area. The survey will meet all THC  cultural resources survey standards. The field survey will consist of an SWCA archaeologist  walking the project area with particular focus paid to the drainages and adjacent terraces and  Page 65 of 104 Exhibit B CP&Y, Inc. 7/14/2016 4 of 17 slopes, as well as any existing potential historic standing structures within the project area.  Subsurface investigations will involve shovel testing in settings with the potential to contain  buried cultural materials and dependent upon variables, such as previous disturbances and the  presence of soils. Shovel tests will be approximately 30 centimeters (cm) in diameter and will be  excavated in arbitrary 20‐cm levels to 100 cm below surface, unless soil characteristics or  bedrock preclude reaching that depth. An SWCA archaeologist will screen the matrix from each  shovel test through ¼‐inch mesh, and will plot the location of each shovel test using a hand‐ held Global Positioning Systems (GPS) receiver. Each shovel test will be recorded on a  standardized form to document the excavations.   SWCA will photograph existing standing structures within, or immediately adjacent (i.e., 164  feet [50 meters] to either side of the ROW), to the project area. A preliminary review of historic  aerial maps and county records will be conducted as needed to determine the significance and  age of any historic‐age built resources.   SWCA will complete appropriate State of Texas Archaeological Site Data Forms for each site  discovered during the investigations. All discovered cultural resources will be defined and  recorded following standard federal and state guidelines. All recorded sites will be mapped in  detail with a GPS unit and plotted on USGS 7.5‐minute topographic maps and appropriate  project maps for planning purposes. SWCA is proposing a non‐collection survey. Artifacts will  be tabulated, analyzed, and documented in the field, but not collected. Temporally diagnostic  artifacts will be described in detail and photographed in the field, then left in place. This policy  will reduce curation costs once the fieldwork is concluded. However, as per the Antiquities  Permit, all original field paperwork and photographs must be curated at an approved  repository. For this project, curation will be done at the TARL at The University of Texas at  Austin.   (c) Reporting   Upon completion of fieldwork, SWCA will prepare a report of the investigations that will  conform to Council of Texas Archeologists and THC standards. The report will document  previous investigations in the area, a background environmental and cultural setting, the  presence and condition of any previously recorded sites revealed in the records review, the  methodology used in the investigations, the general nature and extent of cultural resources  encountered during the cultural resources surveys, recommendations on the need for any  further work, and the potential significance of the cultural resources in regards to future  development and eligibility for NRHP and designation as SALs.   SWCA will submit a draft digital copy of the report to CP&Y and the City of Georgetown for  review and comment prior to agency submittal. SWCA will then incorporate any appropriate  edits and submit a final draft report to CP&Y, the City of Georgetown, and the THC. The THC  has 30 days to review and concur with the report’s findings. Once the THC has approved the  draft report, SWCA will submit a final report to CP&Y, the City of Georgetown, and agencies.  The ACT requires that, upon approval of the draft report, a final report must be produced.  SWCA will furnish one unbound hard copy and two electronic copies of the final report on a  tagged PDF formatted CD to the THC, complete an abstract text online, and furnish 11 hard  copies of the report (without site information, if any) to the university‐based libraries and  archaeological research facilities around the state.   Page 66 of 104 Exhibit B CP&Y, Inc. 7/14/2016 5 of 17 Task II– Threatened and Endangered Species Habitat Assessment and Impacts Analysis   SWCA will conduct a habitat assessment describing land features and vegetation communities,  and evaluate the potential for those communities to provide habitat for federal or state‐listed  threatened and endangered species, including the Jollyville Plateau salamander (JPS) and  Georgetown salamander. Upon completion of the field work, SWCA will prepare a report that  provides our opinion of the potential for the habitats present on the property to support  protected species.   Although springs are uncommon east of the Interstate 35 corridor and no springs are known to  occur within the project area, there are two known JPS populations (and associated USFWS‐ designated Critical Habitat units) in the general vicinity, including an historic population of JPS  approximately 4.4 miles to the south (Brushy Creek Spring) and Kreinke/Tonkawa Spring  approximately 4.4 miles to the southwest. San Gabriel Springs (known to be occupied by the  Georgetown salamander) is approximately 4.2 miles north of the project.   For the purposes of this proposal, we have not included presence/absence surveys in our scope  of work, but if suitable habitats are found to exist, SWCA can schedule and conduct salamander  surveys upon your request. Salamander surveys can be performed at any time except following  rain events. Following the completion of the habitat assessment described herein, SWCA will  coordinate with the CP&Y team to discuss results and determine desired next steps.   A draft report including a map depicting the distribution of any habitat for federally listed  species identified on the property will be submitted to CP&Y within two weeks of completion  of fieldwork. Once the review team has provided SWCA with comments, SWCA will revise the  document and submit a final copy to CP&Y for the project files.  (d) Geologic Assessment and Karst Survey  SWCA will prepare a letter indicating to the City the project limits are outside the limits of the  Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone and Karst Zones which will not require a TCEQ Geologic  Assessment and Karst Survey for the proposed project.     Assumptions/Considerations   SWCA assumes the survey area will be entirely within the existing ROW and proposed  ROW on either side of Rabbit Hill Road for anticipated temporary construction  easements and permanent impacts.    Based on the information provided, SWCA assumes that the project has no nexus with  the Texas  Department of Transportation or any federal regulatory entity, and does not  require compliance with other cultural resources regulations, such as Section 106 of the  NHPA. Should compliance with additional cultural resources regulations be required,  additional work may be needed at additional cost to the client.    The budget is based upon complete and open access to the survey areas. All land  acquisition or right‐of‐entry to the property will be obtained by the client prior to the  commencement of field investigations. Factors beyond SWCA’s control, such as access  restrictions, inclement weather, or unsafe project conditions that result in delays to the  Page 67 of 104 Exhibit B CP&Y, Inc. 7/14/2016 6 of 17 project schedule or require additional mobilizations, may require a Change Order.    SWCA assumes no more than two cultural resources sites will be identified during the  survey based on preliminary desktop review. If additional cultural resource sites are  encountered, SWCA will contact CP&Y to negotiate a Change Order to complete the  additional site documentation and processing.    Additional archival research and in‐depth review of county records to determine the age  and significance of any aboveground historic‐age resources in the project area has not  been included in this cost or proposal.    The cost does not include project‐related safety training or expenses (e.g., OSHA,  HAZWOPER, company, or site‐specific safety training). An additional cost estimate for  safety‐related expenses outside SWCA standard safety protocols will be submitted  separately, if required.    The cost does not include archaeological test excavations or data recovery of any sites  discovered during the survey. II. SURVEYING SERVICES A. PROJECT CONTROL SERVICES  (provided by Wallace Group)  1. The Surveyor will attempt to recover and utilize City of Georgetown NAD‐83/93 (HARN)  NAVD 88 datum, Texas State Plane Coordinate System, Texas Central Zone primary control  monuments for this project unless requested to use another source of datum.  In the case that  the control has been destroyed the Client will be notified immediately.  This scope and fee do  not include effort to re‐establish destroyed control.  A Global Positioning System (GPS) and  conventional land surveying methods will be used to establish additional project control if  needed.  These methods will also be used to perform the various tasks of this project.  B. DESIGN SERVICES  (provided by Wallace Group)  1. The Surveyor shall generate, recover, and/or verify existing horizontal and vertical project  primary control at the site, if any, and reconcile the control to known existing intersecting  projects.  2. The Surveyor shall establish or densify additional secondary control as needed for the project  to collect data along the length of the project.  3. The Surveyor shall, at their discretion, use 5/8“ iron rods with distinguishing caps, cotton  spindles (paved areas) or other durable entities for the project control as applicable.   4. The Surveyor shall perform differential leveling through the project control (primary and  secondary) to establish or extend vertical control for the project.   5. The project limits for surveying shall be along the expected path of Rabbit Hill Road from the  existing Westinghouse Roadway intersection north for approximately 450‐ft between Clearview  Drive and Lookout Ridge.  The survey width along the Rabbit Hill Road corridor will be  approximately 100‐ft wide.  Page 68 of 104 Exhibit B CP&Y, Inc. 7/14/2016 7 of 17 6. The Surveyor shall perform a topographic/design survey within the project limits.  The  topographic/design survey includes, but is not necessarily limited to: roadway, ditches, major  grade breaks, culverts, culvert types and sizes, metal beam guard fence, fences, driveways,  mailboxes, traffic and other signs, mailbox turnouts, striping, and visible above ground utilities.  7. The Surveyor shall survey drainage structures within the limits defined above.   8. The Surveyor shall survey side streets within the project limits to a distance of 100’ from the  proposed alignment or far enough to establish drainage.  9. The Surveyor shall survey driveways within the project limits to a distance of 20’ from the  proposed alignment or far enough to establish drainage.  10. The Surveyor shall provide digital photograph of each end of each cross road drainage structure  located within the project limits.  11. The Surveyor shall process the collected information into a 1 foot contour DTM file utilizing  Geopak V8i.   12. The Surveyor shall locate right‐of‐way monumentation and other evidence to reestablish the  existing right‐of‐way lines for Rabbit Hill and parcel boundaries within the limits of survey.   This is not to be construed as boundary surveying at this time nor is it considered taxable for  the purposes intended at this time.  13. The Surveyor shall set project control (N, E, Elev.) in such manner to reasonably assure the  control will survive construction.  C. TREE SERVICES (provided by Wallace Group)  1.  The Surveyor shall locate trees that 12 inches in diameter and larger, and note the size, species  and canopy area.  D. GEOTECHNICAL LOCATIONS (provided by Wallace Group)  1. The Surveyor will stake prior to boring and locate after boring three (3) geotechnical locations.   The Engineer is to provide the locations for the borings.  E. DELIVERABLES (provided by Wallace Group)  1. The Surveyor shall provide:  (a) 2D MicroStation V8i planimetric file.  (b) 3D MicroStation V8i DTM file including break‐lines and 1 foot contours.  (c) Geopak V8i DTM (tin) file.  (d) ASCII point file.  (e) Two CD‐ROM containing the specified files.  (f) PDF file of each Surveyor’s project field book.  (g) Spreadsheet of landowners for right‐of‐entry letters  F. ASSUMPTIONS (provided by Wallace Group)  1. The Surveyor shall notify the client prior to performing the work if:  Page 69 of 104 Exhibit B CP&Y, Inc. 7/14/2016 8 of 17 (a) Sufficient right‐of‐way monumentation cannot be found to re‐establish the existing  alignments and associated right‐of‐way lines along the project corridor.  (b) Traffic Control cannot be managed by the Surveyor’s personnel.  (c) The work is delayed due to weather or other circumstances beyond the Surveyor’s direct  control.  (d) Existing Project Control cannot be recovered or verified.  G. UTILITIES (provided by The Wallace Group)  1. Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE)  (a) The project limits are approximately 0.75 miles along a new alignment.  (b) The project consists of providing Quality Level (QL)‐B on the existing underground utilities.   QL‐D and QL‐C services are inclusive with the QL‐B product.  (c) The project consists of providing Quality Level (QL)‐A on the existing underground utilities.    (d) Provide QL‐B services for the various utilities noted on the site visit for preparing this scope  of services with associated fees.  The various utilities noted are: water, sanitary sewer,  natural gas, telephone communications (cable and fiber optic) and electrical. This scope of  services is based upon the effort to provide SUE services for these utility systems.  (e) Utility services from the main utility to the right‐of–way to service a lot or structure are not  included within this scope of service nor the estimated utility linear footage previously  shown.  (f) Identify and map the existing utility facilities located on existing utility poles within the  project limits.  The facilities company name and contact information will be provided as part  of the deliverables.  (g) Definitions:  (i) Quality Service Level D (QL‐D) – This level of service is inclusive of QL‐B and consists  of collecting existing utility record information (as‐built) from utility purveyors,  municipalities, counties and other agency suppliers within the area of investigation.   Contact the TxDOT Permit Office to obtain available records of any utility crossing IH  35 within the project limits.  (ii) Quality Service Level C (QL‐C) –This level of service is inclusive of QL‐B and consists  of surveying and obtaining accurate horizontal position of visible utility surface  features associated with the project area to be designated by the Engineer.  (iii) Quality Service Level B (QL‐B Designating Services) – Designate is to indicate, by  marking with paint, the presence and approximate horizontal location of subsurface  utilities using geophysical prospecting techniques, including, without limitations,  electromagnetic, sonic, and acoustical techniques.  (iv) Quality Service Level A (QL‐A Locating (Test Hole) Services) – Locating services is to  locate the accurate horizontal and vertical position of subsurface utilities by  excavating a test hole using vacuum excavation techniques and equipment that is non‐ destructive to utilities.  2. The Engineer will develop a contact list of the affected utility owners in the project corridor.  3. The Engineer will contact each utility company and meet individually with them to review their  assumed utility locations developed from the SUE process.  Page 70 of 104 Exhibit B CP&Y, Inc. 7/14/2016 9 of 17 4. The Engineer will prepare scroll plots indicating researched utility locations to provide to utility  companies / owners for their review and comment.  5. The Engineer will not be responsible for any omission of utility information that is not  obtainable via electromagnetic, sonic or acoustical designating services.  Non‐metallic piping,  inactive electric and/or communication lines may or may not be found by electromagnetic, sonic  or acoustical designating practices.  The Engineer (or his subconsultants) do not warrant and/or  guarantee that all existing utilities will be found.  6. Quality Level A subsurface utilities are not included in this scope and if necessary will be  developed under a supplemental agreement.  H. EASEMENT EXHIBITS & LEGALS – (provided by Wallace Group)  1. The Surveyor shall prepare and provide up to six (6) easement exhibit plats and legal  descriptions for acquiring permanent utility easements and temporary construction easements.  III. PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS & ESTIMATE The engineer will develop and submit Plans, Specifications & Estimates (PS&E) plans at levels  consistent with and required for City 30%, 60%, 90% and final 100% plans.   A. DATA COLLECTION  1. Coordinate with the City, County and TxDOT to obtain pertinent project information.  Meet  periodically with project stakeholders to gather information and provide updated project  information.  2. Perform field investigations of the project.  These investigations will include site visits to the  project site and adjacent area to gather pertinent information relating to the corridor.  Field  investigations will also be performed to review individual property locations and the impacts  of the alignment to that property.  3. Develop a photo inventory of the project site for reference in project meetings, discussions with  stakeholders and discussions with developers, etc., during the project development.  4. Gather and review information from the City, County and TxDOT including existing plans,  project files, existing geometric conditions, existing typical sections, existing drainage facilities,  existing bridge and culvert data and traffic data.  5. Gather and review related existing and draft studies, including feasibility, route, traffic signal,  corridor and MIS/Environmental studies in the project vicinity.  Meet with City personnel to  discuss future plans potentially impacting the project.  6. Gather and review information from the Developers including existing plans, project files,  existing geometric conditions, existing typical sections, existing drainage facilities, existing  bridge and culvert data and traffic data.  B. GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS (provided by CORSAIR.)  1. Soil Borings – Geotechnical Engineering  Page 71 of 104 Exhibit B CP&Y, Inc. 7/14/2016 10 of 17 (a) Perform three (3) borings spaced at approximately 1,000 feet apart along the final alignment  to perform a final pavement design.  (b) If expansive soils are encountered (PVR > 2”) and a lime stabilized subgrade option is  desired, additional borings may be needed to comply with pavement design requirements.   Drill these borings to a minimum depth of ten (10) feet to map geology and collect PI  information if soils are expansive for PVR calculation.  (c) No bridge or retaining wall borings are anticipated to be needed at this time but can be  performed under a supplemental agreement upon request.  The borings will be used to  investigate subsurface stratigraphy and to obtain samples for laboratory testing.  2. Laboratory testing will be performed in accordance with TxDOT Texas Texting Methods to  determine the soil’s plasticity and strength characteristics, including:  (a) NRCS Soil Classification  (b) Atterberg Limits Tests  (c) Sieve Analysis  (d) Soluble Sulfate Content  (e) Moisture Content  (f) Unconfined Compressive Strength  (g) Eades and Grim (ASTM D6276) pH/lime series  3. The Engineer will coordinate with locator service to determine existing utility locations.  4. The Engineer will prepare a pavement design report that will present recommendations for the  design of the roadway pavement sections.  The pavement design will follow the criteria and  guidelines in TxDOT’s Pavement Design Guide and AASHTO’s Guide for the Design of Pavement  Structures. The pavement design report will include:  (a) Site vicinity and geology map.  (b) Generalized subsurface conditions, as well as groundwater conditions encountered during  drilling operations.  (c) Pavement thickness design for the proposed roadway.  Flexible pavement design will be  analyzed using the FPS program.  Rigid pavement design is not anticipated.  (d) Traffic data (ESAL’s) will be provided by the City  C. RIGHT‐OF‐WAY AND UTILITY COORDINATION  1. Right of Way  (a) The Engineer will determine and provide the limits of the proposed ROW to the Surveyor  for preparation of Right‐of‐Way  plans.  2. Utility Adjustments The Engineer will utilize subsurface utility data throughout the design process. A good faith effort will be made to accommodate existing utility locations. Utility conflicts will be identified during the design process to allow for relocation. The Engineer will coordinate with utility providers on necessary relocations. The Engineer shall include the existing utility information in the plans. Page 72 of 104 Exhibit B CP&Y, Inc. 7/14/2016 11 of 17 (a) Identify utility conflicts. The Engineer will provide plan and profiles, culvert layouts, cross sections and other sheets as required to utility providers to assist them in any relocation efforts. (b) The Engineer will be present for one (1) utility relocation meeting. D. ROADWAY DESIGN CONTROLS   1. Develop the roadway design criteria for the project to be discussed, revised and approved by  the City.  This set of criteria will then be complied and documented into a design criteria  spreadsheet.  2. Miscellaneous Plans  (a) A project title sheet will be prepared as required for the construction plans.  (b) A detailed index of sheets will be prepared that shows each sheets location in the plan set,  as well as its corresponding sheet number.  This index will be updated throughout the  submittal process to allow for easier reference during the review process.  (c) Project layout sheets will be prepared at a scale of 1”=200’ that clearly indicates the limits of  the entire project.  (d) Right‐of‐way layout sheets will be completed at a scale of 1”=200’ that clearly indicate the  benchmark locations and associated control information.  These sheets will later be sealed  by a RPLS for submittal.  3. Roadway Plans & Geometry  (a) All plan sheets shall be prepared in an 11” x 17” format; normal scale shall be 1”=50 ft.  horizontal and 1”=5 ft. vertical, unless otherwise stated herein.  (b) Existing typical sections will be completed depicting the existing conditions of the project  roadway.  (c) Proposed typical sections will be completed depicting the improvements to Mays Street,  Westinghouse Road and Rabbit Hill Road.  The proposed typical sections are intended to  show the general cross‐sectional configuration of the roadway in logical sections and will be  prepared to the appropriate level of detail and limits to convey that general information.  (d) A horizontal alignment data sheet will be prepared depicting the horizontal geometric  information for the project roadways to be included in the construction plan set.  (e) Rabbit Hill Rd plan and profile sheets shall be completed depicting the proposed  construction.    (f) Supplemental grading sheets will be prepared at a scale of 1”=20’ for areas of the project that  require additional grading information for construction or review purposes.  (g) The Engineer shall provide plan sheets of removals at a scale of 1”=50’.  Removal sheets shall  clearly identify the disposition of roadway appurtenances.  Description of removal items,  including material, shall be included.  4. Grading and Details  (a) Design cross sections will be completed at 50‐foot stations and other locations as necessary  for the determination of cut and fill quantities.  These sections will also be used to further  refine the design vertical geometry.  Cut and fill quantities determined from the design cross  Page 73 of 104 Exhibit B CP&Y, Inc. 7/14/2016 12 of 17 sections will be shown on the plan/profile sheets.  Cross sections will not be developed as a  deliverable for phased TCP.  (b) The Engineer shall complete intersection layouts for two (2) intersections (Westinghouse and  Clearview).  The intersection layouts will include the design of the pavement and drainage  layouts, as needed, as well as other pertinent details not discernable elsewhere in the plans.  (c) Driveway details will be prepared for each driveway along the project corridor.  When  possible these driveways will be defined in a tabular format.  Non‐typical driveways may  require special details.  (d) The Engineer will develop driveway profiles as required for the project.  These profiles will  be developed to show driveway tie‐back slopes, as well as limits for the contractor’s  information.  (e) Miscellaneous roadway detail sheets will be developed for the project.  The sheets will depict  details required that are not defined in standard detail sheets.  City standards will be used  for the project development.  E. DRAINAGE DESIGN  1. Storm Sewer Design (a) Exterior drainage area maps will be finalized at a scale reasonable to fit drainage areas on  an 11x17 plan sheet. These maps will depict drainage area boundaries and flow direction  arrows.  Each area will be identified with a unique number to be used to find run‐off  information from the calculation sheets.  (b) Interior drainage area maps will be finalized at a scale of 1=100.  These maps will depict  drainage area boundaries and flow direction arrows.  Each area will be identified and cross‐ referenced to the calculation sheets.  (c) Run‐off to each inlet and inlet hydraulic information will be calculated in accordance with  City of Georgetown Drainage Criteria Manual and shown on the run‐off and inlet  computation sheets in an approved format.  (d) Storm sewers will be analyzed and computations will be prepared for the storm sewer  design using approved design software.  (e) Drainage plan and profile sheets will be completed depicting locations of inlets, manholes,  storm sewers, culverts, utilities, channel improvements and ditch locations and flowlines as  required.  These sheets will be prepared at a scale of 1”=50’.  Storm sewer profiles will be  prepared at a scale of 1”=50’ H and 1”=5’ V.  Storm sewer profiles will show pipe size and  type, slope, existing and proposed ground lines above the pipe, pertinent hydraulic  information and locations and sizes of inlets and junctions.  (f) Lateral profile sheets will be developed for the project storm sewer systems.  These sheets  will be developed at a scale of 1”=50’ H and 1”=5’ V.  (g) The Engineer will prepare a tabular ditch layout schedule that depicts pertinent information  about the roadside ditch geometry and design.  This table will include station, offset, flow  line elevation, ditch lining material, as well as ditch bottom width.  The tables will be shown  on the drainage plan sheets.  (h) The Engineer shall provide drainage design details for “non‐standard” drainage structures  in instances where they are not covered by City standard details cannot be utilized.  The  Engineer shall use City standard details where practical.  Page 74 of 104 Exhibit B CP&Y, Inc. 7/14/2016 13 of 17 (i) The Engineer will identify areas within the construction of the storm sewer and culvert  construction that will require trench protection or special shoring.  2. Detention (a) Storm Water  Detention  (i) The Engineer will calculate the increase in peak discharge and runoff volume  associated with the proposed improvements in accordance with the City of  Georgetown Drainage Criteria Manual.  (ii) The Engineer will determine necessary storm sewer modifications to detain runoff.  (b) Design of a detention pond is not included in this scope and if necessary will be developed  under a supplemental agreement. If stormwater detention is required, modifications to the  storm sewer to detain the water will be investigated.Plan Development  (i) Develop a Pond Layout at a scale suitable to show the entire facility on one (1) sheet.  It is anticipated this sheet will be developed at a scale of 1”=50’ H. The pond layout  shall show the overall dimensions of the pond, grading details, location of hydraulic  structures, section cut lines, access locations, hydrologic and hydraulic computations  for the pond  (ii) Develop structural details for the incoming splitter box.  (iii) Develop structural details for the single outlet structure.  3. SW3P and Erosion Control  (a) Erosion control plans will be prepared for the length of project.  Temporary  storm water   management devices will be needed to minimize the sediment runoff during construction  of this project.  The anticipated design components to be utilized on this project are silt fence,  sand bags, rock filter dams, sediment traps and construction exits.  One temporary erosion  control plan depicting the entire project will be developed with notes that indicate that the  contractor is responsible for phasing the devices along with the construction sequencing.   Permanent erosion control measures will be included on these sheets as well.  (b) A Storm Water  Pollution Prevention Plan  (SW3P) will be prepared for this job in accordance  with TCEQ regulations.  (c) Erosion control details will be prepared for any related items that are not covered by City of  Austin  standard details.  F. SIGNING, MARKINGS AND SIGNALIZATION (provided by CP&Y, Inc.)  1. Signing and Pavement Markings  (a) Signing and Pavement marking layouts will be prepared at a scale of 1=100.  Road signs  and markings will be shown all on the same plan sheet.  Any additional sheets for  signing/pavement markings will be included in a future supplemental agreement.  These  layouts will depict striping and delineator type and location, as well as MBGF location,  lengths and end treatments.  Each sign will have a corresponding number for cross‐reference  to the sign summaries.  (b) Pavement marking details will be prepared for non‐standard conditions.  Page 75 of 104 Exhibit B CP&Y, Inc. 7/14/2016 14 of 17 (c) Detail sheets for small signs will be prepared for non‐standard signs.  This sheet is intended  to show the overall dimensions of the signs by determining letter size and spacing.  Details  will not be to scale.  G. MISCELLANEOUS ROADWAY  1. Traffic Control Plan (a) Traffic control typical sections will be prepared for each stage of the construction sequence to clearly delineate the position of the existing traffic with respect to the proposed construction. Temporary traffic barriers and pavement markings will also be shown and dimensioned, as needed. (b) The Engineer will prepare 1”=400’ plan layouts of all advance warning signs for the intersections of Mays Street at Teravista Parkway/Bass Pro Drive and Mays Street at Westinghouse Road. (c) A detailed narrative for the sequence of construction and traffic control general notes will be prepared and submitted to the City for review and incorporation into the plans. The narrative will include a phase-by-phase, step-by-step written account of the proposed activities throughout the construction process. This is intended to be a narrative account of the activities shown in the traffic control plan layouts. (d) Detailed traffic control plans will be prepared at a scale of 1=100. These plans will be developed based on the City’s approval of the conceptual plans developed at the schematic design level. This plan will describe the maintenance of traffic and sequence of work for each phase of the proposed construction. Detour alignments, location of work areas, temporary paving, temporary shoring, signing, barricades and other details will be required to describe the traffic control plan. The Engineer will be required to ensure that proper drainage can be maintained during each phase of construction. (e) Traffic control details will be developed for items not covered by City of Georgetown standard details. (f) An Engineer’s opinion of construction schedule will be computed in order to determine an approximate duration for each of the phases of construction. The schedule will be prepared using Microsoft Project. 2. Illumination (a) The Engineer will design continuous and safety lighting along the project corridor. The lighting will be shown on illumination layouts. (b) The Engineer shall provide electrical circuit plans and details for the roadway lighting systems within the project limits. (c) The Engineer will coordinate with the City in identifying power sources, conduit runs and will show them on the project plans. The Engineer shall identify potential overhead utility conflicts and coordinate with the State and the utility company to help resolve the conflicts. 3. Quantities Quantities will be tabulated for each of the following and as necessary to bid this project:  (a) Traffic Control (per each phase) (b) Earthwork (c) Roadway (d) Retaining Walls (e) Removal Page 76 of 104 Exhibit B CP&Y, Inc. 7/14/2016 15 of 17 (f) Drainage (g) Small / Large Signs (h) Pavement Markings (i) Illumination (j) Utilities (k) Erosion Control and SW3P 4. Summary Sheets Quantities that are calculated will be tabulated on individual summary sheets for inclusion in  the construction plan set:   (a) Traffic Control (per each phase) (b) Earthwork (c) Roadway (d) Retaining Walls (e) Removal (f) Drainage (g) Small / Large Signs (h) Pavement Markings (i) Illumination (j) Utilities 5. Standards, Specifications and Estimate  (a) The Engineer shall utilize City standards for the project as appropriate.  Standards that  require modification will be corrected and sealed by the Engineer.  All other standards will  have their title blocks filled out with the applicable project data and printed for inclusion in  the final plan set.   (b) A tabulation of applicable specifications, special specifications and special provisions will  be prepared for submission with the final PS&E package.  (c) The Engineer will review general notes provided by the City for applicability to the project.   The Engineer will mark‐up a set and return it to the City for their inclusion in the final plan  set.  The Engineer will work with the City to complete the basis of estimate prior to  beginning quantity calculations.  (d) An opinion of probable construction cost will be prepared at the 30%, 90% and prior to final  PS&E submittal and supplied to the City in Microsoft Excel format.  (e) Opinion of probable cost will be broken out for the sections of roadway in the City.  (f) Opinion of probable cost will also be broken out for each bridge class structure.  6. Bid Documents (a) The Engineer will prepare contract bid documents and proposals and make them available  in electronic format (PDF) as well as hard copy for the City’s use.   IV. PROJECT MANAGEMENT A. PROJECT MANAGEMENT   1. Create and submit monthly invoices suitable for payment by the City.  Page 77 of 104 Exhibit B CP&Y, Inc. 7/14/2016 16 of 17 2. Prepare monthly progress reports for submission with the monthly invoices to provide a written  account of the progress made to date on the project.  3. Meet formally at once a month with the City to review project progress.  4. Prepare project meeting summaries for applicable meetings during the project development  process.  5. Meet with property owners, stakeholders, the City, County and TxDOT staff as required  through the project development process.  6. Establish and attend periodic progress meetings (approximately every two months) with other  agencies, including TxDOT, as necessary.  7. The Engineer will have internal meetings with the consultant design team every two weeks for  the length of the project.  It is assumed that these meetings will include key personnel from each  discipline and will be required to discuss and resolve project issues.  8. The Engineer shall prepare and execute contracts with sub‐consultants, monitor sub‐consultants  activities (staff and schedule), complete monthly reports and review and recommend approval  of sub‐consultant invoices.  9. The Engineer will review and coordinate work of sub‐consultants to ensure quality products  are delivered to the County.  The Engineer will also be responsible for the consistency and  coordination between plans developed by each sub‐consultant on the design team.  10. The Engineer shall formally close out the project and perform a documented archive process.  V. BID AND CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES A. BID PHASE SERVICES 1. The Engineer will attend one pre-bid meeting. 2. The Engineer shall assist the City in addressing design questions during the bidding process B. CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES 1. The Engineer shall provide Construction Support Services at the written request of the City project manager. The written request shall include a description of the work requested, a mutually agreed upon time limit, a mutually agreed upon level of effort, a defined deliverable and any special instructions for coordination and submittal. These services shall include, but are not limited to the following: • Responding to requests for information (RFIs) • Providing redesign as directed by the City for Change orders and documentation • Other project related tasks in support of the City during construction The Engineer shall provide minor redesign as requested by the City project manager. In the event that revisions are requested and the work is considered to be additional to that set forth on the original contract or scopes of work, the Engineer shall prepare a budget and a schedule for the additional work requested. The Engineer shall not commence work on a task prior to receiving written approval by the City. 2. Provide shop drawing review. The shop drawing submittals will be limited to those specifically called for in the construction contract documents (plans, standard specifications, special provisions to the standard specifications and special specifications). Such reviews will not extend Page 78 of 104 Exhibit B CP&Y, Inc. 7/14/2016 17 of 17 to means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of construction or to safety precautions and programs incident thereto. Page 79 of 104 TASK ORDER 7/14/2016 Exhibit A to Attachment B - Schedule of Services.docxx ATTACHMENT TO EXHIBIT B Rabbit Hill Road Improvements (Westinghouse Road to North of S. Clearview Dr.) TASK ORDER WORK SCHEDULE Notice to Proceed August 15, 2016 Schematic / 30% PS&E November 22, 2016 60% PS&E January 4, 2017 90% PS&E February 20, 2017 Final PS&E March 6, 2017 Page 80 of 104 TASK ORDER 7/14/2016 Attachment C - Owners Responsibilities.docx EXHIBIT C OWNER’S RESPONSIBILITIES Rabbit Hill Road Improvements  (Westinghouse Road to North of S. Clearview Dr.)  City Provided Information or Work: The City shall provide the following services or perform  the following work:    A. Provide any existing data the Owner has on file concerning the Project, if available.    B. Provide any available as‐built plans for the existing detention pond, overhead and  underground utility lines and other appurtenances within the project limits, if  available.    C. Assist the Engineer, as necessary, in obtaining any required data and information from  the State, County, neighboring cities, developers and/or other franchise utility  companies.    D. Give prompt written notice to Engineer whenever the Owner observes or otherwise  becomes aware of any development that affects the scope or timing of Engineer’s  services.    E. Meet on an as needed basis to answer questions, provide guidance and offer comment.    Any documents or information related to the Work/Services provided by the City to the  Professional, including, without limitation, engineering studies, maps, reports, filed data, notes,  plans, diagrams, sketches, or maps (the “Information”) is and shall remain the property of the  City, and Professional shall have no ownership or other interest in same. The Professional shall  deliver to the City, if requested, a written itemized receipt for the Information, and shall be  responsible for its safe keeping and shall return it to the City, upon request, in as good  condition as when received, normal wear and tear excepted.    Page 81 of 104 Exhibit D - CP&Y, INC.Lump Sum Basis Task Description TOTAL LABOR COSTS I. SOCIAL, ECONOMIC & ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT RIGHT-OF-ENTRY SERVICES CP&Y 1,793.00$ ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS ANALYSIS CP&Y 10,612.00$ SWCA 13,817.00$ I. SOCIAL, ECONOMIC & ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT Subtotal 26,222.00$ II. SURVEYING SERVICES Ground Survey; Project Controls; SUE The Wallace Group 49,300.00$ CP&Y 7,595.00$ II. SURVEYING SERVICES Subtotal 49,300.00$ III. PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATE Data Collection CP&Y 7,010.00$ Geotechnical Investigations Corsair 5,520.00$ Right of way and Utility Coordination CP&Y 8,025.00$ Roadway Design Controls CP&Y 78,855.00$ Drainage Design CP&Y 66,600.00$ Signing, Markings and Signalization CP&Y 9,860.00$ Miscellaneous Roadway CP&Y 77,700.00$ III. PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATE Subtotal 253,570.00$ IV. PROJECT MANAGEMENT Project Management (9 months)CP&Y 35,435.00$ IV. PROJECT MANAGEMENT Subtotal 35,435.00$ V. Bid and Construction Phase Services Bid Phase CP&Y 10,110.00$ Construction Phase CP&Y 35,795.00$ V. Bid and Construction Phase Services Subtotal 45,905.00$ SUBTOTAL LABOR EXPENSES 418,027.00$ CP&Y EXPENSES 7,673.00$ GRAND TOTAL 425,700.00$ SUMMARY of Cost breakdown by Firm CP&Y 357,063.00$ The Wallace Group 49,300.00$ Corsair 5,520.00$ SWCA 13,817.00$ Rabbit Hill Road Improvements Westinghouse Road to North of S. Clearview Dr. City of Georgetown Total Cost Exhibit D ‐ Fee Proposal.xlsx SUMMARY Page 1 of 9Page 82 of 104 Ex h i b i t D Lu m p S u m B a s i s Fe e S c h e d u l e / B u d g e t f o r C P & Y , I n c . Ta s k D e s c r i p t i o n $1 8 5 . 0 0 $ 1 4 5 . 0 0 $ 9 3 . 0 0 $ 9 9 . 0 0 $ 1 0 5 . 0 0 $ 8 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 0 . 0 0 I. S O C I A L , E C O N O M I C & E N V I R O N M E N T A L S T U D I E S A N D P U B L I C I N V O L V E M E N T A RI G H T - O F - E N T R Y S E R V I C E S A1 P e r f o r m p r o p e r t y o w n e r s h i p r e s e a r c h . O b t a i n r i g h t - o f - e n t r y l e t te r s . 1 - 6 - 2 8 2 1 9 1 , 79 3 . 0 0 $ 19 1 , 7 9 3 . 0 0 $ B E N V I R O N M E N T A L C O N S T R A I N T S A N A L Y S I S B1 O b t a i n , r e v i e w , a n d o r g a n i z e e x i s t i n g e n v i r o n m e n t a l c o n s t r a i n ts d a t a . - - 4 - 4 1 6 - 2 4 2 , 07 2 . 0 0 $ B2 C o n d u c t f i e l d r e c on n a i s s a n c e t o v e r i f y p r e l i m e n v i r o n m e n t a l c o n s t r a i n t s m a p - - 8 8 8 - - 2 4 2 , 37 6 . 0 0 $ B3 P r e p a r e a p r e l i m i n a r y e n v i r o n m e n t a l c o n s t r a i n t s m a p u s i n g G I S 2 - 4 2 2 1 6 - 2 6 2 , 43 0 . 0 0 $ B4 P r e p a r e t e c h n i c a l m e m o r a n d u m d e s c r i b i n g e n v i r o n m e n t a l c o n s t r a in t s 2 - 1 6 4 8 8 - 3 8 3 , 73 4 . 0 0 $ B5 S e r v i c e s t o b e p r o v i d e d b y S W C A - - - - - - - - $ 11 2 1 0 , 6 1 2 . 0 0 $ I. S O C I A L , E C O N O M I C & E N V I R O N M E N T A L S T U D I E S A N D P U B L I C I N V O L V E M EN T - S U B T O T A L HO U R S S U B - T O T A L S 5 0 3 8 1 4 2 4 4 8 2 1 3 1 1 2 , 4 0 5 . 0 0 $ SU B T O T A L 92 5 . 0 0 $ - $ 3 , 53 4 . 0 0 $ 1 , 38 6 . 0 0 $ 2 , 52 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 84 0 . 0 0 $ 20 0 . 0 0 $ $1 2 , 4 0 5 . 0 0 Ra b b i t H i l l R o a d I m p r o v e m e n t s W e s t i n g h o u s e R o a d t o N o r t h o f S . C l e a r v i e w D r . Ci t y o f G e o r g e t o w n En v i r o n Ma n a g e r Se n i o r En v i r o n Sp e c i a l i s t En v i r o n Sp e c i a l i s t Se n i o r Ar c h i t e c t u r a l Hi s t o r i a n Bi o l o g i s t G I S S p e c i a l i s t Ad m i n / Cl e r i c a l To t a l L a b o r Ho u r s To t a l D i r e c t La b o r C o s t s Ex h i b i t   D   ‐   F e e   P r o p o s a l . x l s x I.   S o c i a l ,   E c o ,   E n v i r o ,   P u b Pa g e   2   o f   9 Page 83 of 104 Ex h i b i t D Lu m p S u m B a s i s Fe e S c h e d u l e / B u d g e t f o r C P &Y , I n c . Ta s k D e s c r i p t i o n $2 2 5 . 0 0 $ 1 9 0 . 0 0 $ 1 3 5 . 0 0 $ 1 1 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 0 . 0 0 II . S U R V E Y I N G S E R V I C E S A PR O J E C T C O N T R O L S E R V I C E S A S e r v i c e s t o b e p r o v i d e d b y T h e W a l l a c e G r o u p - - - - - - $ 0- $ B D E S I G N S E R V I C E S B S e r v i c e s t o b e p r o v i d e d b y T h e W a l l a c e G r o u p - - - - - - $ 0- $ C T R E E S E R V I C E S C S e r v i c e s t o b e p r o v i d e d b y T h e W a l l a c e G r o u p - - - - - - $ 0- $ D G E O T E C H N I C A L L O C A T I O N S D S e r v i c e s t o b e p r o v i d e d b y T h e W a l l a c e G r o u p - - - - - - $ 0- $ E D E L I V E R A B L E S E S e r v i c e s t o b e p r o v i d e d b y T h e W a l l a c e G r o u p - - - - - - $ 0- $ F A S S U M P T I O N S F S e r v i c e s t o b e p r o v i d e d b y t h e W a l l a c e G r o u p - - - - - - $ 0- $ G U T I L I T I E S G1 S e r v i c e s t o b e p r o v i d e d b y T h e W a l l a c e G r o u p - - - - - - $ G2 D e v e l o p l i s t o f a f f e c t e d u t i l i t i e s - - 1 1 2 - 1 3 1 , 4 5 5 . 0 0 $ G3 C o n t a c t a n d m e e t w i t h u t i l i t i e s 3 - 1 2 1 2 - 2 7 3 , 6 1 5 . 0 0 $ G4 P r e p a r e s c r o l l p l o t f o r u t i l i t i e s 1 - 4 1 6 - 2 1 2 , 5 2 5 . 0 0 $ 61 7 , 5 9 5 . 0 0 $ H E A S E M E N T E X H I B I T S A N D L E G A L S H S e r v i c e s t o b e p r o v i d e d b y t h e W a l l a c e G r o u p - - - - - - $ 0- $ II . S U R V E Y I N G S E R V I C E S - S U B T O T A L HO U R S S U B - T O T A L S 0 4 0 1 7 4 0 0 6 1 7 , 5 9 5 . 0 0 $ SU B T O T A L 90 0 . 0 0 $ - $ 2 , 2 9 5 . 0 0 $ 4 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 $ - $ $7 , 5 9 5 . 0 0 To t a l D i r e c t La b o r C o s t s Ra b b i t H i l l R o a d I m p r o v e m e n t s W e s t i n g h o u s e R o a d t o N o r t h o f S . C l e a r v i e w D r . Ci t y o f G e o r g e t o w n No . o f Sh e e t s Pr o j e c t Ma n a g e r Se n i o r En g i n e e r De s i g n En g i n e e r E. I . T . Ad m i n / Cl e r i c a l To t a l L a b o r Ho u r s Ex h i b i t   D   ‐   F e e   P r o p o s a l . x l s x II .   S u r v e y i n g   S e r v i c e s Pa g e   3   o f   9 Page 84 of 104 Ex h i b i t D - C P & Y , I N C . Lu m p S u m B a s i s Fe e S c h e d u l e / B u d g e t f o r C P & Y , I n c . Ta s k D e s c r i p t i o n $2 2 5 . 0 0 $ 1 9 0 . 0 0 $ 1 3 5 . 0 0 $ 1 1 0 . 0 0 $ 1 9 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 4 5 . 0 0 II I . P L A N S , S P E C I F I C A T I O N S A N D E S T I M A T E A Da t a C o l l e c t i o n A1 C o o r d i n a t e w i t h C i t y 4 - - - - - - 4 9 0 0 . 0 0 $ A2 S i t e v i s i t s o f p r o j e c t c or r i d o r a n d s u r r o u n d i n g a r e a s 4 - 8 4 - - - 1 6 2 , 4 2 0 . 0 0 $ A3 D e v e l o p p h o t o i n v e n t o r y o f p ro j e c t s i t e f o r c o o r d i n a t i o n - - - 4 - - - 4 4 4 0 . 0 0 $ A4 G a t h e r a n d r e v i e w e x i s t i n g i n f o r m a t i o n f r o m t h e C i t y 1 - 2 5 - - - 8 1 , 0 4 5 . 0 0 $ A5 G a t h e r a n d r e v i e w e x i s t i n g i n f o r m a t i o n f r o m t h e T x D O T - - - - - - - - $ A6 G a t h e r a n d r e v i e w e x i s t i n g i n fo r m a t i o n f r o m t h e D e v e l o p e r s 2 - - 1 2 - - 3 1 7 2 , 2 0 5 . 0 0 $ 49 7 , 0 1 0 . 0 0 $ B G e o t e c h n i c a l I n v e s t i g a t i o n s B1 S e r v i c e s t o b e p r o v i d e d b y C O S A I R - - - - - - - - $ B2 S e r v i c e s t o b e p r o v i d e d b y C O S A I R - - - - - - - - $ B3 S e r v i c e s t o b e p r o v i d e d b y C O S A I R - - - - - - - - $ B4 S e r v i c e s t o b e p r o v i d e d b y C O S A I R - - - - - - - - $ 0- $ C R i g h t o f w a y a n d U t i l i t y C o o r d i n a t i o n C1 R i g h t o f W a y - - - - - - - a P r o v i d e l i m i t s o f p r o p o s ed R O W a n d / o r e a s e m e n t s - 2 - 6 - 1 - 9 1 , 1 4 0 . 0 0 $ C2 U t i l i t i e s - - - - - - - a I d e n t i f y u t i l i t y c o n f l i c t s 4 8 - 2 4 - 4 - 4 0 5 , 4 6 0 . 0 0 $ b Att e n d o n e ( 1 ) U t i l i t y C o o r d i n a t i o n M e e t i n g 1 4 - 4 - - - 9 1 , 4 2 5 . 0 0 $ 58 8 , 0 2 5 . 0 0 $ D R o a d w a y D e s i g n C o n t r o l s C1 D e v e l o p r o a d w a y d e s i g n c r it e r i a a n d c o m p i l e s p r e a d s h e e t 1 1 - 6 - - - 8 1 , 0 7 5 . 0 0 $ D1 M i s c e l l a n e o u s P l a n s - - - - - - - a T i t l e S h e e t 1 - - 1 - 2 - 4 5 3 5 . 0 0 $ b I n d e x o f S h e e t s 1 - 1 4 - 4 - 1 0 1 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ c P r o j e c t L a y o u t 1 " = 2 0 0 ' 2 - 4 8 - 2 - 1 6 2 , 0 7 0 . 0 0 $ d R i g h t - o f - w a y L a y o u t 1 " = 2 0 0 ' 1 - - 4 - 4 - 9 1 , 0 6 5 . 0 0 $ D2 R o a d w a y P l a n s & G e o m e t r y - - - - - - - - $ a E x i s t i n g T y p i c a l S e c t i o n s - - - 6 - 2 - 8 8 6 0 . 0 0 $ b P r o p o s e d T y p i c a l S e c t i o n s 2 - 4 1 2 - 1 0 - 2 8 3 , 3 1 0 . 0 0 $ c H o r i z o n t a l D a t a S h e e t 1 - 2 6 - 1 - 1 0 1 , 2 5 5 . 0 0 $ d P l a n & P r o f i l e S h e e t s 1 " = 5 0 ' H a n d 1 " = 4 ' V 4 1 2 2 4 1 0 0 - 4 0 - 1 8 0 2 1 , 4 2 0 . 0 0 $ e S u p p l e m e n t a l G r a d i n g S h e e t s 1 " = 5 0 ' 2 8 4 2 4 - - - 3 8 5 , 1 5 0 . 0 0 $ f R e m o v a l S h e e t s 1 " = 1 0 0 ' - 4 4 2 4 - 1 2 - 4 4 5 , 1 4 0 . 0 0 $ D3 G r a d i n g a n d D e t a i l s - - - - - - - - $ a 5 0 - f t c r o s s s e c t i o n s 4 8 3 2 1 2 0 - - - 1 6 4 1 9 , 9 4 0 . 0 0 $ b I n t e r s e c t i o n l a y o u t s ( 2 l o c a t i o n s ) 1 " = 4 0 ' 2 2 4 4 0 - 1 2 - 6 0 6 , 9 7 0 . 0 0 $ c D r i v e w a y D e t a i l s - 2 4 8 - 4 - 1 8 2 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ d D r i v e w a y P r o f i l e s 1 - 2 4 - - - 7 9 3 5 . 0 0 $ e M i s c e l l a n e o u s r o a d w a y d e t a i l s 2 4 8 2 4 - 8 - 4 6 5 , 7 3 0 . 0 0 $ 64 2 7 8 , 8 5 5 . 0 0 $ E D r a i n a g e D e s i g n E1 S t o r m S e w e r D e s i g n - - - - - - - a E x t e r i o r D r a i n a g e A r e a s 1 2 - 2 0 2 - - 2 5 3 , 1 8 5 . 0 0 $ b I n t e r i o r D r a i n a g e A r e a s 2 - 1 2 6 0 - 8 - 8 2 9 , 4 7 0 . 0 0 $ c R u n - o f f C a l c u l a t i o n s 1 2 6 3 2 - - - 4 1 4 , 9 3 5 . 0 0 $ d A n a l y z e S t o r m S e w e r S y s t e m s 1 4 8 4 0 - - - 5 3 6 , 4 6 5 . 0 0 $ e D r a i n a g e P l a n & P r o f i l e 1 " = 5 0 ' H a n d 1 " = 4 ' V 2 8 1 2 4 0 - 1 2 - 7 4 9 , 1 9 0 . 0 0 $ f L a t e r a l P r o f i l e s 1 " = 5 0 ' H a n d 1 " = 4 ' V 1 4 6 3 2 - 8 - 5 1 6 , 1 1 5 . 0 0 $ To t a l D i r e c t La b o r C o s t s Ra b b i t H i l l R o a d I m p r o v e m e n t s W e s t i n g h o u s e R o a d t o N o r t h o f S . C l e a r v i e w D r . Ci t y o f G e o r g e t o w n Pr o j e c t Ma n a g e r Se n i o r En g i n e e r De s i g n En g i n e e r E. I . T . Ch i e f Hy d r o l o g i s t Se n i o r En v i r o n Sp e c i a l i s t To t a l L a b o r Ho u r s CA D D Op e r a t o r Ex h i b i t   D   ‐   F e e   P r o p o s a l . x l s x II I .   P S & E Pa g e   4   o f   9 Page 85 of 104 Ex h i b i t D - C P & Y , I N C . Lu m p S u m B a s i s Fe e S c h e d u l e / B u d g e t f o r C P & Y , I n c . Ta s k D e s c r i p t i o n $2 2 5 . 0 0 $ 1 9 0 . 0 0 $ 1 3 5 . 0 0 $ 1 1 0 . 0 0 $ 1 9 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 4 5 . 0 0 To t a l D i r e c t La b o r C o s t s Ra b b i t H i l l R o a d I m p r o v e m e n t s W e s t i n g h o u s e R o a d t o N o r t h o f S . C l e a r v i e w D r . Ci t y o f G e o r g e t o w n Pr o j e c t Ma n a g e r Se n i o r En g i n e e r De s i g n En g i n e e r E. I . T . Ch i e f Hy d r o l o g i s t Se n i o r En v i r o n Sp e c i a l i s t To t a l L a b o r Ho u r s CA D D Op e r a t o r g T a b u l a r D i t c h T a b l e s - 1 - 6 - 1 - 8 9 5 0 . 0 0 $ h D r a i n a g e D e t a i l s f o r n o n - st a n d a r d s t r u c t u r e s 2 2 6 1 2 - - - 2 2 2 , 9 6 0 . 0 0 $ i I d e n t i f y t r e n c h e x c a v a t i on p r o t e c t i o n l o c a t i o n s - 1 4 8 - 2 - 1 5 1 , 8 1 0 . 0 0 $ E3 D e t e n t i o n - - - - - - - - $ a S t o r m W a t e r D e t e n t i o n - - - - - - - - $ i C a l c u l a t e i n c r e a s e i n p e a k d i s c h a r g e s 1 4 - 1 6 4 - - 2 5 3 , 5 0 5 . 0 0 $ ii C a l c u l a t e / d e t e r m i n e s t or m s e w e r f o r d e t e n t i o n 1 2 1 2 4 0 6 - - 6 1 7 , 7 6 5 . 0 0 $ E4 S W 3 P a n d E r o s i o n C o n t r o l - - - - - - - - $ a D e v e l o p f i n a l e r o s i o n c o n t r o l p l a n s 2 4 1 6 4 0 - - - 6 2 7 , 7 7 0 . 0 0 $ b D e v e l o p S W 3 P p l a n 2 - 2 1 6 - - - 2 0 2 , 4 8 0 . 0 0 $ 53 9 6 6 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ F S i g n i n g , M a r k i n g s a n d S i g n a l i z a t i o n F1 S i g n i n g & P a v e m e n t m a r k i n g l a y o u t s - - - - - - - a S i g n i n g & P a v e m e n t m a r k i n g l a y o u t s 1 " = 1 0 0 ' 2 - 8 4 0 - 8 - 5 8 6 , 7 3 0 . 0 0 $ b P a v e m e n t M a r k i n g D e t a i l s - 2 - 8 - - - 1 0 1 , 2 6 0 . 0 0 $ c D e t a i l s h e e t s f o r s m a l l s i g n s 2 - 4 8 - - - 1 4 1 , 8 7 0 . 0 0 $ 82 9 , 8 6 0 . 0 0 $ G M i s c e l l a n e o u s R o a d w a y G1 T r a f f i c C o n t r o l P l a n - - - - - - - a T C P T y p i c a l s 1 1 4 2 4 - - - 3 0 3 , 5 9 5 . 0 0 $ b T C P A d v a n c e d W a r n i n g L a y o u t s 1 " = 4 0 0 ' - 2 - 8 - - - 1 0 1 , 2 6 0 . 0 0 $ c T C P N a r r a t i v e f o r S e q u e n c e o f C o n s t r u c t i o n 1 8 - - - - - 9 1 , 7 4 5 . 0 0 $ d T C P P l a n s S h e e t s 1 " = 1 0 0 ' - 2 4 2 4 - 1 6 - 4 6 5 , 1 6 0 . 0 0 $ e T C P D e t a i l s - N o n S t a n d a r d - 1 - 8 - - - 9 1 , 0 7 0 . 0 0 $ f T C P C o n s t r u c t i o n S c h e d u l e D e v e l o p e d 2 8 4 - - - - 1 4 2 , 5 1 0 . 0 0 $ G2 I l l u m i n a t i o n - - - - - - - - $ a C o n t i n u o u s L i g h t i n g L a y o u t s 2 8 1 2 4 0 - 1 6 - 7 8 9 , 5 9 0 . 0 0 $ b E l e c t r i c a l C i r c u i t P l a n s a n d D e t a i l s - 4 4 1 2 - 4 - 2 4 3 , 0 2 0 . 0 0 $ c U t i l i t y C o o r d i n a t i o n , P o w e r S o u r c e C o o r d i n a t i o n 4 - - - - - - 4 9 0 0 . 0 0 $ G3 Q u a n t i t i e s - - - - - - - - $ a T r a f f i c C o n t r o l - - 2 4 - - - 6 7 1 0 . 0 0 $ bE a r t h w o r k 2 2 2 1 2 - - - 1 8 2 , 4 2 0 . 0 0 $ c R o a d w a y 1 2 4 1 6 - - - 2 3 2 , 9 0 5 . 0 0 $ d R e t a i n i n g W a l l s - 1 4 1 2 - - - 1 7 2 , 0 5 0 . 0 0 $ e R e m o v a l - - 2 1 0 - - - 1 2 1 , 3 7 0 . 0 0 $ f D r a i n a g e 2 2 4 2 4 - - - 3 2 4 , 0 1 0 . 0 0 $ g S i g n s - 1 2 1 0 - - - 1 3 1 , 5 6 0 . 0 0 $ h P a v e m e n t M a r k i n g s 1 2 4 1 0 - - - 1 7 2 , 2 4 5 . 0 0 $ i I l l u m i n a t i o n - 1 4 1 2 - - - 1 7 2 , 0 5 0 . 0 0 $ j U t i l i t i e s - - - - - - - - $ k E r o s i o n C o n t r o l a n d S W 3 P - 2 4 1 0 - - - 1 6 2 , 0 2 0 . 0 0 $ G4 S u m m a r y S h e e t s - - - - - - - - $ a T r a f f i c C o n t r o l 1 - - 2 - - - 3 4 4 5 . 0 0 $ bE a r t h w o r k - - - 2 - - - 2 2 2 0 . 0 0 $ c R o a d w a y 1 1 - 2 - - - 4 6 3 5 . 0 0 $ d R e t a i n i n g W a l l s - 1 - 2 - - - 3 4 1 0 . 0 0 $ e R e m o v a l - - - 2 - - - 2 2 2 0 . 0 0 $ f D r a i n a g e 1 1 - 2 - - - 4 6 3 5 . 0 0 $ g S i g n s - - - 2 - - - 2 2 2 0 . 0 0 $ h P a v e m e n t M a r k i n g s 1 - - 2 - - - 3 4 4 5 . 0 0 $ i I l l u m i n a t i o n 1 1 - 2 - - - 4 6 3 5 . 0 0 $ j U t i l i t i e s - - - 2 - - - 2 2 2 0 . 0 0 $ k E r o s i o n C o n t r o l a n d S W 3 P - - - 2 - - - 2 2 2 0 . 0 0 $ Ex h i b i t   D   ‐   F e e   P r o p o s a l . x l s x II I .   P S & E Pa g e   5   o f   9 Page 86 of 104 Ex h i b i t D - C P & Y , I N C . Lu m p S u m B a s i s Fe e S c h e d u l e / B u d g e t f o r C P & Y , I n c . Ta s k D e s c r i p t i o n $2 2 5 . 0 0 $ 1 9 0 . 0 0 $ 1 3 5 . 0 0 $ 1 1 0 . 0 0 $ 1 9 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 4 5 . 0 0 To t a l D i r e c t La b o r C o s t s Ra b b i t H i l l R o a d I m p r o v e m e n t s W e s t i n g h o u s e R o a d t o N o r t h o f S . C l e a r v i e w D r . Ci t y o f G e o r g e t o w n Pr o j e c t Ma n a g e r Se n i o r En g i n e e r De s i g n En g i n e e r E. I . T . Ch i e f Hy d r o l o g i s t Se n i o r En v i r o n Sp e c i a l i s t To t a l L a b o r Ho u r s CA D D Op e r a t o r G5 S t a n d a r d s , S p e c i f i c a t i o n s a n d E s t i m a t e - - - - - - - - $ a D o w n l o a d , P r e p a r e a n d M o d i f y S t a n d a r d s 1 2 - 1 2 - - - 1 5 1 , 9 2 5 . 0 0 $ b S p e c i f i c a t i o n s 4 2 4 - 8 - - - 3 6 6 , 3 4 0 . 0 0 $ c G e n e r a l N o t e s 4 4 - 4 - - - 1 2 2 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ d P r e l i m i n a r y C o s t E s t i m a t e a n d i t e m p r i c e i d e n t i f i c a t i o n 4 8 - 1 6 - - - 2 8 4 , 1 8 0 . 0 0 $ G6 P r e p a r e c o n t r a c t b i d d o c u m e n t s a n d p r o p o s a l s 8 8 2 0 2 4 - - - 6 0 8 , 6 6 0 . 0 0 $ 57 7 7 7 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 $ II I . P L A N S , S P E C I F I C A T I O N S A N D E S T I M A T E - S U B T O T A L HO U R S S U B - T O T A L S 1 0 2 1 8 8 2 7 9 1 , 1 9 0 1 2 1 8 1 3 1 , 9 5 5 2 4 8 , 0 5 0 . 0 0 $ SU B T O T A L 2 2 , 9 5 0 . 0 0 $ 3 5 , 7 2 0 . 0 0 $ 3 7 , 6 6 5 . 0 0 $ 1 3 0 , 9 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 2 8 0 . 0 0 $ 1 8 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 3 5 . 0 0 $ $2 4 8 , 0 5 0 . 0 0 Ex h i b i t   D   ‐   F e e   P r o p o s a l . x l s x II I .   P S & E Pa g e   6   o f   9 Page 87 of 104 Ex h i b i t D - C P & Y , I N C . Lu m p S u m B a s i s Fe e S c h e d u l e / B u d g e t f o r C P & Y , I n c . Ta s k D e s c r i p t i o n $2 2 5 . 0 0 $ 1 9 0 . 0 0 $ 1 3 5 . 0 0 $ 1 1 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 8 5 . 0 0 IV . P R O J E C T M A N A G E M E N T A Pr o j e c t M a n a g e m e n t ( 9 m o n t h s ) A1 C r e a t e a n d s u b m i t m o n t h l y i n v o i c e s 9 - - - 1 5 - 2 4 3 , 5 2 5 . 0 0 $ A2 P r e p a r e m o n t h l y p r o g r e s s r e p o r t s 6 - - - - - 6 1 , 3 5 0 . 0 0 $ A3 M e e t w i t h C i t y t w i c e a m o n t h 2 4 - 2 0 - - - 4 4 8 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ A4 P r e p a r e p r o j e c t m e e t i n g s u m m a r i e s 4 - 1 2 - - - 1 6 2 , 5 2 0 . 0 0 $ A5 M e e t w i t h p r o p e r t y o w n e r s , s t a k e h o l d e r s , a n d C i t y 1 2 - 1 2 - - - 2 4 4 , 3 2 0 . 0 0 $ A6 M e e t w i t h o t h e r S t a k e h o l d e r s e v e r y 2 m o n t h s 8 8 - - - - 1 6 3 , 3 2 0 . 0 0 $ A7 I n t e r n a l D e s i g n T e a m M e e t i n g s 1 4 1 4 1 0 1 0 - - 4 8 8 , 2 6 0 . 0 0 $ A8 M o n i t o r a n d R e v i e w S u b - c o n s u l t a n t i n v o i c e s 4 - - - 2 - 6 1 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ A9 C o o r d i n a t e a n d R e v i e w S u b - c o n s u l t a n t w o r k p r o d u c t s 4 2 - - - - 6 1 , 2 8 0 . 0 0 $ A10 P r o j e c t C l o s e o u t 2 - 6 - 4 - 1 2 1 , 6 6 0 . 0 0 $ 20 2 3 5 , 4 3 5 . 0 0 $ IV . P R O J E C T M A N A G E M E N T - S U B T O T A L HO U R S S U B - T O T A L S 8 7 2 4 6 0 1 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 3 5 , 4 3 5 . 0 0 $ SU B T O T A L 1 9 , 5 7 5 . 0 0 $ 4 , 5 6 0 . 0 0 $ 8 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ - $ 35 , 4 3 5 . 0 0 $ Ra b b i t H i l l R o a d I m p r o v e m e n t s W e s t i n g h o u s e R o a d t o N o r t h o f S . C l e a r v i e w D r . Ci t y o f G e o r g e t o w n Pr o j e c t Ma n a g e r To t a l L a b o r Ho u r s Ad m i n / Cl e r i c a l En v i r o n Ma n a g e r Se n i o r En g i n e e r De s i g n En g i n e e r E. I . T . To t a l D i r e c t La b o r C o s t s Ex h i b i t   D   ‐   F e e   P r o p o s a l . x l s x IV .   P r o j e c t   M a n a g e m e n t Pa g e   7   o f   9 Page 88 of 104 Ex h i b i t D - C P & Y , I N C . Fe e S c h e d u l e / B u d g e t f o r C P & Y , I n c . Ta s k D e s c r i p t i o n $2 2 5 . 0 0 $ 1 9 0 . 0 0 $ 1 3 5 . 0 0 $ 1 1 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 8 5 . 0 0 V. B i d a n d C o n s t r u c t i o n P h a s e S e r v i c e s A Bi d P h a s e A1 C o o r d i n a t e w i t h C i t y d u r i n g B i d P a c k a g e 8 - 8 3 0 - - 4 6 6 , 1 8 0 . 0 0 $ A2 A t t e n d p r e - b i d m e e t i n g 3 - - - - - 3 6 7 5 . 0 0 $ A3 A s s i s t C i t y a t c o n t r a c t b i d o p e n i n g 8 - - 2 - - 1 0 2 , 0 2 0 . 0 0 $ A4 T a b u l a t e b i d s , r e s e a r c h l o w b i d d e r , m a k e r e c o m m e n d a t i o n 1 3 - 4 - - 8 1 , 2 3 5 . 0 0 $ 67 1 0 , 1 1 0 . 0 0 $ B C o n s t r u c t i o n P h a s e B1 C r e a t e a n d s u b m i t m o n t h l y i n v o i c e s ( 1 2 m o n t h s ) 8 - - - 2 0 - 2 8 3 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ B2 P r e p a r e f o r a n d a t t e n d p r e - c o n s t r u c t i o n m e e t i n g 4 - - 4 - - 8 1 , 3 4 0 . 0 0 $ B3 A t t e n d u p t o 6 c o n s t r u c t i o n m e e t i n g s 8 2 4 - - - - 3 2 6 , 3 6 0 . 0 0 $ B4 R e s p o n d t o R F I ' s , m a k e u p d a t e s a s a g r e e d 8 1 2 - 6 0 - - 8 0 1 0 , 68 0 . 0 0 $ B5 R e v i e w C o n t r a c t o r P a y A p p l i c a t i o n s ( 1 2 m o n t h s ) 7 2 8 - - - - 3 5 6 , 8 9 5 . 0 0 $ B6 C o n d u c t f i n a l s i t e v i s i t f o r su b s t a n i a l c o m p l e t i o n 6 4 - 2 - - 1 2 2 , 3 3 0 . 0 0 $ B7 P r o v i d e s h o p d r a w i n g r e v i e w 1 2 - 2 0 - - 2 3 2 , 8 0 5 . 0 0 $ B8 D e v e l o p a s - b u i l t s 1 4 - 4 0 - - 4 5 5 , 3 8 5 . 0 0 $ 23 5 3 5 , 7 9 5 . 0 0 $ V. B i d a n d C o n s t r u c t i o n P h a s e S e r v i c e s - S U B T O T A L HO U R S S U B - T O T A L S 6 3 7 7 8 1 6 2 2 0 0 3 3 0 4 9 , 7 0 5 . 0 0 $ SU B T O T A L 1 4 , 1 7 5 . 0 0 $ 1 4 , 6 3 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 0 8 0 . 0 0 $ 1 7 , 8 2 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ - $ 49 , 7 0 5 . 0 0 $ Ra b b i t H i l l R o a d I m p r o v e m e n t s W e s t i n g h o u s e R o a d t o N o r t h o f S . C l e a r v i e w D r . Ci t y o f G e o r g e t o w n Pr o j e c t Ma n a g e r Se n i o r En g i n e e r De s i g n En g i n e e r E. I . T . Ad m i n / Cl e r i c a l En v i r o n Ma n a g e r To t a l L a b o r Ho u r s To t a l D i r e c t La b o r C o s t s Ex h i b i t   D   ‐   F e e   P r o p o s a l . x l s x V.   B i d   a n d   C o n s t r u c t i o n   P h a s e Pa g e   8   o f   9 Page 89 of 104 Exhibit D - CP&Y, INC. CADD Plotting sf 1.50$ 300 450.00$ Mylar Plots (22x34 As-Builts) lf 6.00$ 0 -$ Digital Ortho Plotting lf 2.00$ 50 100.00$ 11" X 17" Mylar sheet 1.00$ -$ 8 1/2" X 11" B/W Paper Copies sheet 0.10$ 50 5.00$ 11" X 17" B/W Paper Copies sheet 0.15$ 1,750 262.50$ 8 1/2" X 11" Color Paper Copies sheet 1.00$ 20 20.00$ 11" X 17" Color Paper Copies sheet 1.80$ 20 36.00$ Fax Copies sheet 0.10$ -$ Film and Development roll 8.00$ -$ 4 X 6 Digital Color Prints picture 0.50$ -$ Oversized Digital Color Prints picture 50.00$ -$ Standard Postage letter 0.44$ 24 10.56$ Express Mail (Standard) each 15.00$ 4 60.00$ Express Mail (Oversized) each 30.00$ -$ Deliveries each 25.00$ 4 100.00$ Airfare each 200.00$ -$ Rental Car day 80.00$ -$ Lodging day 85.00$ -$ Meals day 36.00$ -$ Mileage mile 0.540$ 100 54.00$ GPS Rental day 80.000$ -$ HazMat Database Search each 250.000$ -$ TCEQ WPAP Fee each 6,500.000$ 1 6,500.00$ -$ Miscellaneous Project Related Expenses NA at cost NA 74.94$ SUBTOTAL DIRECT EXPENSES 7,673.00$ Rabbit Hill Road Improvements Westinghouse Road to North of S. Clearview Dr. City of Georgetown Expense Item Unit Unit Cost Amount Total Cost Exhibit D ‐ Fee Proposal.xlsx EXPENSES Page 9 of 9Page 90 of 104 A. Right-Of-Entry Services Task Staff Type Hrs Rate Total Lump Sum Fee Research Landowners Surv Tech 2 90 180 Compile Spreadsheet & Prepare Letters Surv Tech 2 70 140 QC Data & Letters Prior to Mailing Out RPLS 1 140 140 Distribute Letters Via Certified Mail Surv Tech 4 70 280 Record Landowner Response/Comments Surv Tech 2 70 140 Final QC of Landowner Response & Provide to Client RPLS 1 140 140 $1,020 $1,100 B. Design Services - Approx. 3,200 LF of Rabbit Hill Rd. (starting approx. 800' north of Westinghouse Rd. and extending north to approx. 400' north of N. Clearview Dr.) Task Staff Type Hrs Rate Total Research Right-of-Way's (R.O.W.) Surv Tech 4 90 360 Build Deed Sketch of all Properties & R.O.W.'s Surv Tech 8 90 720 QC/PM RPLS 2 140 280 Recover & Verify Existing Horz. & Vert. Control Field 2 125 250 Check Field Data Surv Tech 2 90 180 QC/PM RPLS 1 140 140 Set & Tie Secondary Horz. Control Field 4 125 500 Process & Check Field Data Surv Tech 2 90 180 Set 3 Benchmarks Field 1 125 125 Run 3-Wire Vertical Control over Benchmarks & Horz. Control Field 6 125 750 Process & Check Field Data Surv Tech 2 90 180 QC/PM RPLS 1 140 140 Recon & Tie Property Corners and R.O.W. Markers Field 10 125 1250 Analyze/Resolution of ties to Property Corners and R.O.W. markers Surv Tech 6 90 540 QC/PM RPLS 2 140 280 Topo/Cross-Sections at 100' intervals and pick up all grade breaks for a minimum of 100' total (70' west & 30' east roadway centerline) plus detail any drainage structures Field 40 125 5000 Field Supervision RPLS 6 140 840 Process & Check Topo/Cross-Section field data Surv Tech 8 90 720 Draft/Contour Topo/Cross-Section field data Surv Tech 40 90 3600 QA/QC Topo/Cross-Section data and drawings RPLS 8 140 1120 Field Walk Topo/Cross-Section data to QC drawings Surv Tech 10 90 900 Total $18,055 $18,100 C. Tree Services Task Staff Type Hrs Rate Total Locate, measure & tag trees that are 12 inches in diameter and larger. Field 8 125 1000 Prep. for field crew & Drafting Surv Tech 2 90 180 Field Supervision & QC RPLS 1 140 140 Total $1,320 $1,300 D. Utilities - Perform Level B, C & D tasks for Visible & Underground Utilities Task Staff Type Hrs Rate Total Research & perform Level B, C & D tasks for the underground utilities SUE Tech 50 90 4500 Obtain Measure Downs & Hard Elevations on San. Sew. MH.s, etc. Field 4 125 500 Oakmont Drive Extension Project - Rabbit Hill Road Design Survey & SUE EXHIBIT B - The Wallace Group Mays Street Extension Project - Surveying & SUE Page 91 of 104 Oakmont Drive Extension Project - Rabbit Hill Road Design Survey & SUE EXHIBIT B - The Wallace Group Mays Street Extension Project - Surveying & SUE Verify and add measure downs and hard elevations to drawing along with visible & underground utility information.Surv Tech 10 90 900 QC & Supervision RPLS 4 140 560 Total $6,460 $6,500 E. Utilities - Perform Level A (Test Holes) Task Staff Type Hrs Rate Total We will perform up to five (5) Test Holes to a maximum depth of 10' at $1,500/each. Includes time involved to perform electronic locates prior to conducting test holes and obtaining X, Y, Z on utility.9000 Total $9,000 $9,000 F. Deliverables Task Staff Type Hrs Rate Total Provide Microstation files, Geopak file, Ascii point file, Two CD-ROM, PDF file of Surveyor's field book and Spreadsheet of Landowners for Right-of-Entry Letters, and requested photographs of drainage structures.Surv Tech 8 90 720 Final QC & Supervision RPLS 4 140 560 Total $1,280 $1,300 G. Parcel Plats & Legal Descriptions Task Staff Type Hrs Rate Total Prepare individual parcel plats and legal descriptions for use in acquiring right-of-way which includes setting newly calculated boundary corners. We will prepare up to six (6) Right-of-Way instruments at $2,000/each 12000 Total $12,000 $12,000 Total Contract 49,300$ Page 92 of 104 Lump Sum Fee 1. Soil Borings No.Cost Total Pavement 3 150.00$ 450.00$ Mob 1 325.00$ 325.00$ Sub. Tot.775.00$ 2. Laboratory Testings No.Cost Total Atters 9 70.00$ 630.00$ -200 9 30.00$ 270.00$ Sulfates 3 85.00$ 255.00$ Resilent Modulus Testing 0 460.00$ -$ Soil Moisture Density relationship TXE 114-E 1 110.00$ 110.00$ Optimum Lime/Cement Content pH TXE 121 0 220.00$ -$ UU Triax Compression 0 35.00$ -$ Sub Tot.1,265.00$ 4. Engineering Hours Billing Rate Total Principal Engineer 4 150.00$ 600.00$ Sr. Engineer 12 105.00$ 1,260.00$ EIT 18 90.00$ 1,620.00$ Sub. Total 3,480.00$ Total 5,520.00$ Cost Estimate-Geotechnical Services Rabbit Hill Road Extension (Westinghouse Road to North of S. Clearview Dr.) Georgetown, Texas Exhibit D - CORSAIR Exhibit D - Corsair.xlsx Geotechnical Services Page 1 of 1 Page 93 of 104 Environmental Services for the Rabbit Hill Road Project Page 6 COST ESTIMATE SWCA will perform the above environmental and cultural resources services on a time and materials not to exceed basis. Task I – Cultural Resources Cost Project Management and Safety $1,074.00 Background Review, Scope of Work, and Permit Application $1,512.00 Survey, Reporting, and Curation $5,695.00 Cultural Resources Total $8,281.00 Task II – Threatened & Endangered Species Cost Habitat Assessment and Impacts Analysis Total $5,536.00 Grand Total $13,817.00 Page 94 of 104 City of Georgetown, Texas Transportation Enhancement Corp July 20, 2016 SUBJECT: Cons id eration and p o s s ib le ac tion to approve a C o ns truc tion Co ntract with C.C. C arlton Ind ustries , LTD, o f Aus tin, TX, fo r the Mays Street Extens ion P ro ject from Bas s P ro Drive/Teravis ta Boulevard to Wes tingho use R o ad in the amo unt o f $ $6,375,088.88. – Bill Dryden, P.E., Trans portation Engineer, and Edward G. Polas ek, AICP, Trans p o rtatio n S ervic es Directo r. ITEM SUMMARY: In No vember 2014, the GTEC Board ap p ro ved a bud get amend ment in the amount of $10,638,371.60 authorizing a projec t to extend Mays S treet from Teravis ta P arkway to Wes tingho use Road. The C ity engaged the firm of CP&Y, Inc ., o f Aus tin, Texas , to d evelo p the alignment, p reliminary engineering plans and rights -o f-way doc uments for the projec t. The City rec eived sealed c o nstruc tion b id s fo r this projec t on T hurs d ay, June 30, 2016. Four bids were rec eived , with C.C. Carlto n Indus tries , LTD, of Aus tin, T X, s ubmitting the ap p arent lo w bid in the amo unt o f $6,375,088.88 ($6,281,120.88 fo r the b as e b id and $93,968.00 fo r Alternate No . 1). The Engineer’s Es timate o f Probable C o nstruc tion Costs was $7,408,682.40 ($7,294,442.40 for the base bid and $ 114,240.00 for Alternate No. 1). CP &Y has evaluated all the bids for ac curacy and c o mp lianc e with the bid doc uments, checked Bid d er’s referenc es and has d etermined C.C. Carlton Ind us tries ’ bid to b e the lowes t and mo s t res p o nsive b id . CP &Y rec ommend s award o f the C o ns truc tion Contrac t to C.C. Carlto n Indus tries, LTD, o f Austin, TX, fo r the Mays Street Extens ion Projec t fro m Bas s Pro Drive/Teravis ta Boulevard to Westinghous e Road in the amo unt o f $ $6,375,088.88. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff c onc urs with CP&Y and rec ommend s award of the Co nstruc tio n Contrac t to C.C. Carlton Indus tries, LTD, o f Aus tin, T X, for the Mays Street Extens io n Projec t fro m Bas s P ro Drive/Teravis ta Bo ulevard to Wes tingho use Road in the amo unt o f $ $6,375,088.88. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The c o s ts are s hared in ac cordance with the fund ing s p lit as o utlines in the Interlo cal Agreement b etween the cities o f Georgetown (73%, or $ 4,585,218.24 o f the Bas e Bid) and Round Ro ck (27%, or $ 1,695,902.64 o f the Bas e Bid). F und ing for the Projec t is availab le in the amend ed F Y 2014-2015 GTEC b udget. T he financ ial analys is wo rks heet is attached . SUBMITTED BY: Bill Dryden, P.E.; Trans portation Engineer ATTACHMENTS: Description Type GTEC Budgetary Works heet Backup Material Page 95 of 104 Engineer’s Letter of Recommendation w/Bid Tabulation Backup Material Page 96 of 104 PROJECT No.DATE: PROJECT NAME: 5RI 7/11/2016 Division/Department: Director Approval EGP 7/11/16 Prepared By:Finance Approval TOTAL ANNUAL BUDGET 10,150,000.00 (Current year only) Actual Cost Agenda Total Spent Encumbrance Item & Encumbered % Annual (A) before agenda item (B)(A + B) Budget Consulting (CPY-15-001)704,330.00 704,330.00 7% Right of Way 0.00 0% Construction (see Comments below)6,375,088.88 6,375,088.88 63% Other Costs 0.00 0% Total Current Year Costs 704,330.00 6,375,088.88 7,079,418.88 Approved GENERAL LEDGER ACCOUNT NUMBER CY Budget 400-9-0980-90-060 10,150,000.00 Total Budget 10,150,000.00 TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET 10,150,000.00 (includes all previous yrs.) Prior Years Current Year Total Project % Total Spent/Encumbered Costs Costs Budget Consulting 704,330.00 0.00 704,330.00 7% Right of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% Construction 0.00 4,585,218.24 4,585,218.24 45% Other Costs 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% Total Project Costs 704,330.00 4,585,218.24 5,289,548.24 Bill Dryden, Transportation Engineer Transportation Services GTEC - Budgetary and Financial Analysis Worksheet Comments: Includes $1,695,902.64 Reimbursable from Round Rock and $93,968 reimbursable from developer Mays Street Extension Mays Street Extension Construction Page 97 of 104 Page 1 of 1 July 13th, 2016 Bill Dryden, P.E. City of Georgetown 300-1 Industrial Ave Georgetown, TX 78627 RE: Mays Street Extension Project (Contract No. 2016-506-C) – Award Recommendation The City opened bids for the Mays Street Extension (Project Contract No. 2016-506-C) on Thursday July 30th, at 2:00 PM from the following four (4) contractors: 1. C.C. Carlton Industries, LTD 2. Joe Bland Construction, LP 3. Chasco Constructors, LTD, LLP 4. MA Smith Contracting Inc. The low bidder for the Base Bid is C.C. Carlton Construction, at $6,281,120.88 The Alternate Bid No. 1 is $93,968.00 The combined low bid amount is $6,375,088.88 The supplied references indicated C.C. Carlton has completed projects of similar size, scope and complexity as the Mays Street Extension Project. The submitted bid form has been checked for accuracy. CP&Y recommends the City of Georgetown award the contract to the apparent low bidder – C.C. Carlton in the amount of $6,375,088.88 If you have any questions regarding the bids or this letter, please let me know. Sincerely, CP&Y TBPE, FIRM REGISTRATION # 1741    Anthony Serda, P.E. Project Manager Enclosures: Bid Tabulation cc: Gary Hudder, P.E - City of Round Rock Page 98 of 104 Bi d T a b u l a t i o n Ma y s S t r e e t E x t e n s i o n P r o j e c t IT E M  DE S C R I P T I O N  & PR I C E  IN  WO R D S Un i t P r i c e T o t a l U n i t E s t i m a t e U n i t P r i c e T o t a l U n i t B i d U n i t P r i c e To t a l U n i t B i d U n i t P r i c e T o t a l U n i t B i d U n i t P r i c e T o t a l U n i t B i d CI P 1 0 ‐11 L S Mo b i l i z a t i o n ,  Bo n d s  an d  In s u r a n c e ,  no t ‐to ‐ex c e e d  5%  of  th e  To t a l  Am o u n t ,   Co m p l e t e  Fo r 34 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 4 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 8 1 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 8 1 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 7 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 7 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 4 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 4 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 5 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 5 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ G1 ‐11 L S Pr e p a r e  an d  Su b m i t  a Ba r r i c a d e ,  Si g n i n g  an d  Tr a f f i c  Sa f e t y  Pl a n  (V e h i c u l a r  an d   Pe d e s t r i a n )  an d  Co n t r o l  Pl a n  pr e p a r e d  an d  si g n e d  by  a P. E .  fo r  Al l  Pa r t s ,   Co m ple t e  Fo r 1, 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 9 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 9 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ G1 ‐21 2 M O Im p l e m e n t  an d  Ad m i n i s t e r  Ba r r i c a d e ,  Si g n i n g  an d  Tr a f f i c  Sa f e t y  Pl a n ,   Co m p l e t e  Fo r 1, 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 4 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 0 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 $ G2 ‐11 L S Pr o v i d e  La b o r ,  Eq u i p m e n t ,  To o l s  an d  Su p e r v i s i o n  to  Co m p l e t e  Pr e p a r a t i o n  of   Ri g h t ‐of ‐Wa y ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 30 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 0 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 5 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 5 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 7 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 7 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 0 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 0 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ G3 ‐1 IT E M  RE M O V E D - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ CI P 9 ‐11 L S Pr e p a r e  St o r m w a t e r  Po l l u t i o n  Pr e v e n t i o n  Pl a n ,  in c l u d i n g  Su b m i s s i o n  to  an d   Re c e i v i n g  Pe r m i t s  fr o m  Te x a s  Co m m i s s i o n  on  En v i r o n m e n t a l  Qu a l i t y  (T C E Q ) ,   Co m ple t e  Fo r 3, 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ CI P 1 0 ‐21 L S Pr o v i d e  DV D  of  Ri g h t ‐of ‐Wa y  Pr e c o n s t r u c t i o n  an d  Po s t  Co n s t r u c t i o n  Si t e   Co n d i t i o n s  fo r  th e  To t a l  Pr o j e c t ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 1, 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ CI P 1 1 ‐11 L S Su b m i t  Tr e n c h  Sa f e t y  Pl a n  pr e p a r e d  an d  si g n e d  by  P. E .  in  co m p l i a n c e  wi t h   St a t e  La w  an d  OS H A ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 1, 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ TX 4 0 2 1 , 3 9 4 L F Im p l e m e n t  an d  Fo l l o w  Tr e n c h  Sa f e t y  Pl a n  (P i p e ) ( B o x e s ) ,  Co m p l e t e  fo r 3. 0 0 $ 4 , 1 8 2 . 0 0 $ 1 . 0 0 $ 1 , 3 9 4 . 0 0 $ 1 . 0 0 $ 1 , 3 9 4 . 0 0 $ 2 . 0 0 $ 2 , 7 8 8 . 0 0 $ 1 . 0 0 $ 1 , 3 9 4 . 0 0 $ G6 ‐1 1 4 , 7 4 5 L F Fu r n i s h ,  In s t a l l  & Re m o v a l  of  Si l t  Fe n c e ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 2. 5 0 $ 3 6 , 8 6 2 . 5 0 $ 3 . 0 0 $ 4 4 , 2 3 5 . 0 0 $ 3 . 0 0 $ 4 4 , 2 3 5 . 0 0 $ 2 . 0 0 $ 2 9 , 4 9 0 . 0 0 $ 2 . 3 0 $ 3 3 , 9 1 3 . 5 0 $ G6 ‐2 2 5 2 L F Fu r n i s h ,  In s t a l l  & Re m o v a l  of  Ro c k  Be r m ,  Co m p l e t e  fo r 38 . 0 0 $ 9 , 5 7 6 . 0 0 $ 3 0 . 0 0 $ 7 , 5 6 0 . 0 0 $ 2 6 . 0 0 $ 6 , 5 5 2 . 0 0 $ 1 7 . 0 0 $ 4 , 2 8 4 . 0 0 $ 3 3 . 0 0 $ 8 , 3 1 6 . 0 0 $ G6 ‐32 E A Fu r n i s h ,  In s t a l l  & Re m o v a l  of  St a b i l i z e d  Co n s t r u c t i o n  Ex i t ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 9, 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 2 6 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 5 2 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ G6 ‐4 7 , 1 0 0 S Y Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  Er o s i o n  Co n t r o l  Bl a n k e t s ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 2. 0 0 $ 1 4 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 . 4 0 $ 9 , 9 4 0 . 0 0 $ 2 . 0 0 $ 1 4 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 . 5 0 $ 1 0 , 6 5 0 . 0 0 $ 1 . 5 0 $ 1 0 , 6 5 0 . 0 0 $ G7 ‐1 3 3 , 8 1 0 S Y Fu r n i s h  & In s t a l l  Lo a m  an d  Hy d r o s e e d i n g  In c u d i n g  Wa t e r i n g ,  Fe r t i l i z e r  an d   Mo w i n g  to  Es t a b l i s h  Gr o w t h ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r   2. 5 0 $ 8 4 , 5 2 5 . 0 0 $ 0 . 8 0 $ 2 7 , 0 4 8 . 0 0 $ 1 . 0 0 $ 3 3 , 8 1 0 . 0 0 $ 2 . 0 0 $ 6 7 , 6 2 0 . 0 0 $ 1 . 7 0 $ 5 7 , 4 7 7 . 0 0 $ SD 2 ‐1 2 8 , 4 3 6 C Y Un c l a s s i f i e d  Ro a d w a y  Ex c a v a t i o n ,  In c l u d i n g  Re m o v a l  of  Ex i s t i n g  As p h a l t   Ro a d w a y ,  cu r b  an d  gu t t e r ,  an d  ex i s t i n g  dr a i n a g e  pi p e s  an d  cu l v e r t s ,  Co m p l e t e   Fo r 12 . 0 0 $ 3 4 1 , 2 3 2 . 0 0 $ 1 3 . 0 0 $ 3 6 9 , 6 6 8 . 0 0 $ 1 3 . 0 0 $ 3 6 9 , 6 6 8 . 0 0 $ 1 2 . 1 0 $ 3 4 4 , 0 7 5 . 6 0 $ 1 5 . 0 0 $ 4 2 6 , 5 4 0 . 0 0 $ SD 3 ‐1 6 1 , 9 4 7 C Y Pl a c e  an d  Co m p a c t  (D e n s i t y  Co n t r o l )  Em b a n k m e n t  fo r  Ro a d w a y ,  Co m p l e t e   Fo r 16 . 0 0 $ 9 9 1 , 1 5 2 . 0 0 $ 1 9 . 5 5 $ 1 , 2 1 1 , 0 6 3 . 8 5 $ 2 5 . 0 0 $ 1 , 5 4 8 , 6 7 5 . 0 0 $ 2 4 . 4 0 $ 1 , 5 1 1 , 5 0 6 . 8 0 $ 2 6 . 0 0 $ 1 , 6 1 0 , 6 2 2 . 0 0 $ SD 4 ‐1 2 5 0 S Y Fu r n i s h  an d  Pl a c e  14 ʺ  Tx D O T  It e m  24 7  (T y p e  A,  Gr a d e  4)  Cr u s h e d  Li m e s t o n e   Ba s e  Ma t e r i a l  fo r  Ba s e  Co u r s e ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 20 . 0 0 $ 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2 . 6 0 $ 3 , 1 5 0 . 0 0 $ 1 4 . 0 0 $ 3 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 0 . 6 0 $ 7 , 6 5 0 . 0 0 $ 4 5 . 0 0 $ 1 1 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ SD 4 ‐2 4 7 , 9 5 7 S Y Fu r n i s h  an d  Pl a c e  16 ʺ  Tx D O T  It e m  24 7  (T y p e  A,  Gr a d e  4)  Cr u s h e d  Li m e s t o n e   Ba s e  Ma t e r i a l  fo r  Ba s e  Co u r s e ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 19 . 0 0 $ 9 1 1 , 1 8 3 . 0 0 $ 1 3 . 6 0 $ 6 5 2 , 2 1 5 . 2 0 $ 1 4 . 0 0 $ 6 7 1 , 3 9 8 . 0 0 $ 1 3 . 2 5 $ 6 3 5 , 4 3 0 . 2 5 $ 1 6 . 0 0 $ 7 6 7 , 3 1 2 . 0 0 $ SD 4 ‐3 7 0 9 S Y Fu r n i s h  an d  Pl a c e  19 ʺ  Tx D O T  It e m  24 7  (T y p e  A,  Gr a d e  4)  Cr u s h e d  Li m e s t o n e   Ba s e  Ma t e r i a l  fo r  Ba s e  Co u r s e ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 26 . 0 0 $ 1 8 , 4 3 4 . 0 0 $ 1 7 . 0 0 $ 1 2 , 0 5 3 . 0 0 $ 1 9 . 0 0 $ 1 3 , 4 7 1 . 0 0 $ 3 9 . 1 0 $ 2 7 , 7 2 1 . 9 0 $ 1 9 . 0 0 $ 1 3 , 4 7 1 . 0 0 $ TX 5 0 0 1 ‐1 4 7 , 9 5 7 S Y Fu r n i s h  an d  Pl a c e  Tx D O T  It e m  50 0 1  (T y p e  2)  Ge o g r i d  Ba s e  Re i n f o r c e m e n t ,   Co m p l e t e  Fo r 1. 5 0 $ 7 1 , 9 3 5 . 5 0 $ 2 . 3 0 $ 1 1 0 , 3 0 1 . 1 0 $ 1 . 6 0 $ 7 6 , 7 3 1 . 2 0 $ 1 . 3 5 $ 6 4 , 7 4 1 . 9 5 $ 3 . 0 0 $ 1 4 3 , 8 7 1 . 0 0 $ TX 2 6 0 ‐1 7 0 9 S Y Pr o v i d e  La b o r  an d  Eq u i p m e n t  to  Li m e  Tr e a t  Su g r a d e  (E X I S T I N G  MA T E R I A L )   (8 ʺ) pe r  Tx D O T  It e m  26 0 ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 9. 0 0 $ 6 , 3 8 1 . 0 0 $ 9 . 3 5 $ 6 , 6 2 9 . 1 5 $ 5 . 0 0 $ 3 , 5 4 5 . 0 0 $ 2 2 . 0 0 $ 1 5 , 5 9 8 . 0 0 $ 7 . 0 0 $ 4 , 9 6 3 . 0 0 $ TX 2 6 0 ‐2 1 7 T O N Fu r n i s h  Tx D O T  It e m  26 0 ,  Li m e  (H y d r a t e d  Li m e  (S L U R R Y ) ) ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 17 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 8 9 0 . 0 0 $ 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ 1 8 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 0 6 0 . 0 0 $ SD 1 ‐1 4 0 , 0 7 2 S Y Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  2. 5 ʺ  Ty p e  ʺ Cʺ  HM A C  wi t h  Pr i m e  an d  Ta c k  Co a t ,  Co m p l e t e   Fo r 12 . 0 0 $ 4 8 0 , 8 6 4 . 0 0 $ 1 1 . 9 0 $ 4 7 6 , 8 5 6 . 8 0 $ 1 3 . 0 0 $ 5 2 0 , 9 3 6 . 0 0 $ 1 2 . 2 5 $ 4 9 0 , 8 8 2 . 0 0 $ 1 3 . 1 5 $ 5 2 6 , 9 4 6 . 8 0 $ SD 1 ‐2 4 0 , 6 3 6 S Y F u r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  2ʺ  Ty p e  ʺ Cʺ  (S u r f )  HM A C  wi t h  Ta c k  Co a t ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 11 . 0 0 $ 4 4 6 , 9 9 6 . 0 0 $ 9 . 5 0 $ 3 8 6 , 0 4 2 . 0 0 $ 1 2 . 0 0 $ 4 8 7 , 6 3 2 . 0 0 $ 9 . 5 0 $ 3 8 6 , 0 4 2 . 0 0 $ 1 0 . 5 0 $ 4 2 6 , 6 7 8 . 0 0 $ SD 1 ‐3 5 6 4 S Y Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  4ʺ  Ty p e  ʺ Bʺ  HM A C  wi t h  Pr i m e  an d  Ta c k  Co a t ,  Co m p l e t e   Fo r 20 . 0 0 $ 1 1 , 2 8 0 . 0 0 $ 2 7 . 0 0 $ 1 5 , 2 2 8 . 0 0 $ 1 9 . 0 0 $ 1 0 , 7 1 6 . 0 0 $ 2 7 . 3 0 $ 1 5 , 3 9 7 . 2 0 $ 3 0 . 5 0 $ 1 7 , 2 0 2 . 0 0 $ C4 ‐1 2 1 , 8 9 0 L F Fu r n i s h  & In s t a l l  Co n c r e t e  Cu r b  an d  Gu t t e r ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r   15 . 0 0 $ 3 2 8 , 3 5 0 . 0 0 $ 1 5 . 0 0 $ 3 2 8 , 3 5 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2 . 0 0 $ 2 6 2 , 6 8 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2 . 7 5 $ 2 7 9 , 0 9 7 . 5 0 $ 1 3 . 0 0 $ 2 8 4 , 5 7 0 . 0 0 $ C5 ‐1 9 9 1 S Y Co n s t r u c t  6ʺ  Co n c r e t e  Dr i v e w a y ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 90 . 0 0 $ 8 9 , 1 9 0 . 0 0 $ 5 5 . 0 0 $ 5 4 , 5 0 5 . 0 0 $ 8 4 . 0 0 $ 8 3 , 2 4 4 . 0 0 $ 8 7 . 0 0 $ 8 6 , 2 1 7 . 0 0 $ 8 0 . 0 0 $ 7 9 , 2 8 0 . 0 0 $ C5 ‐2 7 , 4 8 6 S Y Co n s t r u c t  4ʺ  Co n c r e t e  Si d e w a l k ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 50 . 0 0 $ 3 7 4 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 0 . 0 0 $ 2 9 9 , 4 4 0 . 0 0 $ 4 0 . 0 0 $ 2 9 9 , 4 4 0 . 0 0 $ 3 2 . 5 0 $ 2 4 3 , 2 9 5 . 0 0 $ 4 4 . 0 0 $ 3 2 9 , 3 8 4 . 0 0 $ C5 ‐3 1 3 0 S Y Co n s t r u c t  Cu r b  Ra m p ,    Ty p e  6 (M O D ) ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 10 0 . 0 0 $ 1 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 9 5 . 0 0 $ 1 2 , 3 5 0 . 0 0 $ 1 3 0 . 0 0 $ 1 6 , 9 0 0 . 0 0 $ 8 8 . 0 0 $ 1 1 , 4 4 0 . 0 0 $ 7 5 . 0 0 $ 9 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 $ TX 4 0 0 ‐13 0 S Y Co n s t r u c t  Cu t  an d  Re s t o r e  Pa v e m e n t  In c l u d i n g  As p h a l t  Su r f a c i n g  & Ba c k f i l l ,   Co m p l e t e  Fo r 15 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 9 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 9 0 . 0 0 $ 1 7 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 2 5 . 0 0 $ 1 2 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 $ TX 4 5 0 ‐16 4 L F Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  Pe d e s t r i a n  Ra i l ,  Tx D O T  It e m  45 0  Ty p e  B,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 85 . 0 0 $ 5 , 4 4 0 . 0 0 $ 6 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 8 4 0 . 0 0 $ 9 0 . 0 0 $ 5 , 7 6 0 . 0 0 $ 7 7 . 0 0 $ 4 , 9 2 8 . 0 0 $ 9 0 . 0 0 $ 5 , 7 6 0 . 0 0 $ TX 5 2 8 ‐1 5 3 4 S Y Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l    La n d s c a p e  Pa v e r s ,  Tx D O T  It e m  52 8 ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 10 0 . 0 0 $ 5 3 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 1 2 . 7 2 $ 6 0 , 1 9 2 . 4 8 $ 1 0 5 . 0 0 $ 5 6 , 0 7 0 . 0 0 $ 6 2 . 0 0 $ 3 3 , 1 0 8 . 0 0 $ 6 5 . 0 0 $ 3 4 , 7 1 0 . 0 0 $ TX 5 5 2 ‐1 8 3 0 L F Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  Tx D O T  WI R E  FE N C E  (T Y  D)  Ga t e s ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 15 . 0 0 $ 1 2 , 4 5 0 . 0 0 $ 5 . 0 0 $ 4 , 1 5 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 . 0 0 $ 8 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 7 . 1 0 $ 5 , 8 9 3 . 0 0 $ 9 . 0 0 $ 7 , 4 7 0 . 0 0 $ TX 5 5 6 ‐1 1 0 0 L F Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  Pi p e  Un d e r d r a i n  (T y p e  8) ,  Tx D O T  It e m  55 6 ,  In c l u d i n g   Be d d i n g  an d  Ba c k f i l l ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 16 . 0 0 $ 1 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 5 . 0 0 $ 4 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 4 . 0 0 $ 3 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 7 . 0 0 $ 2 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 5 . 0 0 $ 3 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ IT E M  NO . ES T I M A T E D   QU A N T I T Y UN I T En g i n e e r i n g E s t i m a t e C . C . C a r l t o n J o e B l a n d C o n s t r u c t i o n C h a s c o S m i th C o n t r a c t i n g 1 o f 5 Page 99 of 104 Bi d T a b u l a t i o n Ma y s S t r e e t E x t e n s i o n P r o j e c t IT E M  DE S C R I P T I O N  & PR I C E  IN  WO R D S Un i t P r i c e T o t a l U n i t E s t i m a t e U n i t P r i c e T o t a l U n i t B i d U n i t P r i c e To t a l U n i t B i d U n i t P r i c e T o t a l U n i t B i d U n i t P r i c e T o t a l U n i t B i d IT E M  NO . ES T I M A T E D   QU A N T I T Y UN I T En g i n e e r i n g E s t i m a t e C . C . C a r l t o n J o e B l a n d C o n s t r u c t i o n C h a s c o S m i th C o n t r a c t i n g C8 ‐1 2 , 0 4 1 L F Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  18 ʺ  Cl a s s  II I  Re i n f o r c e d  Co n c r e t e  Pi p e  In c l u d i n g  Be d d i n g  &  Ba c k f i l l ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 75 . 0 0 $ 1 5 3 , 0 7 5 . 0 0 $ 4 4 . 0 0 $ 8 9 , 8 0 4 . 0 0 $ 4 0 . 0 0 $ 8 1 , 6 4 0 . 0 0 $ 5 8 . 0 0 $ 1 1 8 , 3 7 8 . 0 0 $ 5 5 . 0 0 $ 1 1 2 , 2 5 5 . 0 0 $ C8 ‐2 4 6 7 L F Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  24 ʺ  Cl a s s  II I  Re i n f o r c e d  Co n c r e t e  Pi p e  In c l u d i n g  Be d d i n g  &  Ba c k f i l l ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 85 . 0 0 $ 3 9 , 6 9 5 . 0 0 $ 5 9 . 0 0 $ 2 7 , 5 5 3 . 0 0 $ 5 0 . 0 0 $ 2 3 , 3 5 0 . 0 0 $ 7 0 . 0 0 $ 3 2 , 6 9 0 . 0 0 $ 8 1 . 0 0 $ 3 7 , 8 2 7 . 0 0 $ C8 ‐3 1 , 3 6 7 L F Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  30 ʺ  Cl a s s  II I  Re i n f o r c e d  Co n c r e t e  Pi p e  In c l u d i n g  Be d d i n g  &  Ba c k f i l l ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 10 5 . 0 0 $ 1 4 3 , 5 3 5 . 0 0 $ 6 9 . 0 0 $ 9 4 , 3 2 3 . 0 0 $ 6 6 . 0 0 $ 9 0 , 2 2 2 . 0 0 $ 8 5 . 0 0 $ 1 1 6 , 1 9 5 . 0 0 $ 9 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2 3 , 0 3 0 . 0 0 $ C8 ‐4 2 3 0 L F Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  36 ʺ  Cl a s s  II I  Re i n f o r c e d  Co n c r e t e  Pi p e  In c l u d i n g  Be d d i n g  &  Ba c k f i l l ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 14 5 . 0 0 $ 3 3 , 3 5 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 5 . 0 0 $ 2 4 , 1 5 0 . 0 0 $ 9 1 . 0 0 $ 2 0 , 9 3 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2 1 . 0 0 $ 2 7 , 8 3 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2 7 . 0 0 $ 2 9 , 2 1 0 . 0 0 $ C8 ‐5 9 8 8 L F Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  42 ʺ  Cl a s s  II I  Re i n f o r c e d  Co n c r e t e  Pi p e  In c l u d i n g  Be d d i n g  &  Ba c k f i l l ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 18 0 . 0 0 $ 1 7 7 , 8 4 0 . 0 0 $ 1 1 4 . 0 0 $ 1 1 2 , 6 3 2 . 0 0 $ 1 2 3 . 0 0 $ 1 2 1 , 5 2 4 . 0 0 $ 1 4 5 . 0 0 $ 1 4 3 , 2 6 0 . 0 0 $ 1 5 0 . 0 0 $ 1 4 8 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ SD 6 ‐11 E A Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  84 ʺ  Co n c r e t e  St o r m  Se w e r  Ma n h o l e  In c l u d i n g  Be d d i n g  &  Ba c k f i l l ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 10 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 7 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 7 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 , 9 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 , 9 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ C1 ‐11 9 E A Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  10 ʹ  X 4ʹ  Cu r b  In l e t ,  in c l u d i n g  ex c a v a t i o n  an d  ba c k f i l l ,   Co m p l e t e  Fo r 5, 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 4 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 8 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 6 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 9 9 0 . 0 0 $ 7 5 , 8 1 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 8 5 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ C1 ‐22 E A Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  15 ʹ  X 4ʹ  Cu r b  In l e t ,  in c l u d i n g  ex c a v a t i o n  an d  ba c k f i l l ,   Co m p l e t e  Fo r 7, 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 7 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 1 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 , 0 4 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2 , 0 8 0 . 0 0 $ 6 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ C1 ‐32 E A Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  20 ʹ  X 4ʹ  Cu r b  In l e t ,  in c l u d i n g  ex c a v a t i o n  an d  ba c k f i l l ,   Co m p l e t e  Fo r 11 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 9 , 9 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 9 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 7 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 5 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 $ 7 , 6 6 0 . 0 0 $ 1 5 , 3 2 0 . 0 0 $ 7 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 5 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 $ TX 4 6 2 ‐1 5 1 3 L F Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  Co n c r e t e  Bo x  Cu l v e r t  Tx D O T  It e m  46 2  (4  FT  X 2 FT ) ,   In c l u d i n g  Be d d i n g  an d  Ba c k f i l l ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 20 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 2 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2 5 . 0 0 $ 6 4 , 1 2 5 . 0 0 $ 1 5 0 . 0 0 $ 7 6 , 9 5 0 . 0 0 $ 1 7 5 . 0 0 $ 8 9 , 7 7 5 . 0 0 $ 1 6 0 . 0 0 $ 8 2 , 0 8 0 . 0 0 $ TX 4 6 2 ‐3 7 6 3 L F Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  Co n c r e t e  Bo x  Cu l v e r t  Tx D O T  It e m  46 2  (5  FT  X 3 FT ) ,   In c l u d i n g  Be d d i n g  an d  Ba c k f i l l ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 25 0 . 0 0 $ 1 9 0 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 $ 1 8 0 . 0 0 $ 1 3 7 , 3 4 0 . 0 0 $ 1 9 8 . 0 0 $ 1 5 1 , 0 7 4 . 0 0 $ 2 6 0 . 0 0 $ 1 9 8 , 3 8 0 . 0 0 $ 2 3 0 . 0 0 $ 1 7 5 , 4 9 0 . 0 0 $ TX 4 6 6 ‐26 E A Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  Co n c r e t e  Wi n g w a l l  fo r  Bo x  Cu l v e r t  Tx D O T  It e m  46 6  (P W ‐ 1) ,  In c l u d i n g  Co n c r e t e  Ap r o n ,  Ex c a v a t i o n  an d  Ba c k f i l l ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 16 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 9 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 6 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 2 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 9 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 1 8 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ TX 4 6 7 ‐11 E A Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  Co n c r e t e  Sa f e t y  En d  Tr e a t m e n t  fo r  RC P  Pi p e  Tx D O T  It e m   46 7  (T Y  II ) ( 4 2  IN ) ( 3 : 1 ) ,  In c l u d i n g  Ex c a v a t i o n  an d  Ba c k f i l l ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 3, 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 7 7 5 . 0 0 $ 3 , 7 7 5 . 0 0 $ 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 7 7 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 7 7 0 . 0 0 $ 5 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 $ TX 4 6 7 ‐24 E A Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  Co n c r e t e  Sa f e t y  En d  Tr e a t m e n t  fo r  Bo x  Cu l v e r t  Tx D O T   It e m  46 7  (T Y  I) ( S  = 4 FT ) ( H W  = 2 FT ) ( 6 : 1 ) ( P ) ,  In c l u d i n g  Ex c a v a t i o n  an d  Ba c k f i l l ,   Co m ple t e  Fo r 8, 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 9 1 0 . 0 0 $ 1 9 , 6 4 0 . 0 0 $ 6 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 4 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ TX 4 7 9 ‐1 2 E A F u r n i s h  Al l  Ma t e r i a l s  & La b o r  Ne c e s s a r y  to  Ad j u s t  In l e t  (C a p ) ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 1, 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 7 1 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 4 2 0 . 0 0 $ 9 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ SP ‐11 L S Fu r n i s h  an d  Co n s t r u c t  Wa t e r  Qu a l i t y  Sy s t e m  ‐ Sa n d  Fi l t e r ,  In c l u d i n g   Ex c a v a t i o n ,  Sa n d  an d  Co n c r e t e  St r u c t u r e s ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 45 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 5 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 2 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 2 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 9 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 9 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 9 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 9 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 7 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 7 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ SD 5 ‐1 1 , 9 3 6 L F Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  4”  Ye l l o w  So l i d  Th e r m o p l a s t i c  St r i p i n g ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r   0. 5 0 $ 9 6 8 . 0 0 $ 0 . 5 5 $ 1 , 0 6 4 . 8 0 $ 0 . 4 0 $ 7 7 4 . 4 0 $ 0 . 3 0 $ 5 8 0 . 8 0 $ 0 . 6 0 $ 1 , 1 6 1 . 6 0 $ SD 5 ‐2 5 0 1 L F Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  4”  Wh i t e  So l i d  Th e r m o p l a s t i c  St r i p i n g ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r   0. 4 5 $ 2 2 5 . 4 5 $ 0 . 5 5 $ 2 7 5 . 5 5 $ 0 . 4 0 $ 2 0 0 . 4 0 $ 0 . 3 0 $ 1 5 0 . 3 0 $ 0 . 6 0 $ 3 0 0 . 6 0 $ SD 5 ‐3 2 , 6 6 9 L F Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  4”  Wh i t e  Br o k e n  Th e r m o p l a s t i c  St r i p i n g ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r   0. 4 5 $ 1 , 2 0 1 . 0 5 $ 0 . 5 5 $ 1 , 4 6 7 . 9 5 $ 0 . 4 0 $ 1 , 0 6 7 . 6 0 $ 0 . 3 0 $ 8 0 0 . 7 0 $ 0 . 6 0 $ 1 , 6 0 1 . 4 0 $ SD 5 ‐42 6 L F Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  4”  Wh i t e  DO T  Th e r m o p l a s t i c  St r i p i n g ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r   1. 0 0 $ 2 6 . 0 0 $ 0 . 5 5 $ 1 4 . 3 0 $ 0 . 4 0 $ 1 0 . 4 0 $ 0 . 3 5 $ 9 . 1 0 $ 0 . 6 0 $ 1 5 . 6 0 $ SD 5 ‐5 1 3 2 L F Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  8”  Wh i t e  DO T  Th e r m o p l a s t i c  St r i p i n g ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r   0. 9 5 $ 1 2 5 . 4 0 $ 1 . 1 0 $ 1 4 5 . 2 0 $ 0 . 8 0 $ 1 0 5 . 6 0 $ 0 . 7 5 $ 9 9 . 0 0 $ 1 . 1 5 $ 1 5 1 . 8 0 $ SD 5 ‐6 1 5 , 2 2 6 L F Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  8”  Wh i t e  So l i d  Th e r m o p l a s t i c  St r i p i n g ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r   1. 0 0 $ 1 5 , 2 2 6 . 0 0 $ 1 . 1 0 $ 1 6 , 7 4 8 . 6 0 $ 0 . 7 0 $ 1 0 , 6 5 8 . 2 0 $ 0 . 6 5 $ 9 , 8 9 6 . 9 0 $ 1 . 1 5 $ 1 7 , 5 0 9 . 9 0 $ SD 5 ‐7 9 9 5 L F Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  12 ”  Wh i t e  So l i d  Th e r m o p l a s t i c  St r i p i n g ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r   3. 0 0 $ 2 , 9 8 5 . 0 0 $ 2 . 5 0 $ 2 , 4 8 7 . 5 0 $ 3 . 0 0 $ 2 , 9 8 5 . 0 0 $ 3 . 0 0 $ 2 , 9 8 5 . 0 0 $ 2 . 5 0 $ 2 , 4 8 7 . 5 0 $ SD 5 ‐8 3 0 7 L F F u r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  24 ʺ  Wh i t e  St o p  Ba r  Th e r m o p l a s t i c  St r i p i n g ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 8. 0 0 $ 2 , 4 5 6 . 0 0 $ 6 . 3 0 $ 1 , 9 3 4 . 1 0 $ 6 . 0 0 $ 1 , 8 4 2 . 0 0 $ 6 . 0 0 $ 1 , 8 4 2 . 0 0 $ 6 . 5 0 $ 1 , 9 9 5 . 5 0 $ SD 5 ‐93 2 E A Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  Th e r m o p l a s t i c  St r i p i n g  (A r r o w ) ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 11 5 . 0 0 $ 3 , 6 8 0 . 0 0 $ 5 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ 9 5 . 0 0 $ 3 , 0 4 0 . 0 0 $ 8 4 . 0 0 $ 2 , 6 8 8 . 0 0 $ 1 4 5 . 0 0 $ 4 , 6 4 0 . 0 0 $ SD 5 ‐10 2 E A Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  Th e r m o p l a s t i c  St r i p i n g  (D o u b l e  Ar r o w ) ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 10 0 . 0 0 $ 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 6 5 . 0 0 $ 3 3 0 . 0 0 $ 1 5 0 . 0 0 $ 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 1 0 . 0 0 $ 4 2 0 . 0 0 $ SD 5 ‐11 3 2 E A Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  Th e r m o p l a s t i c  St r i p i n g  (W o r d ) ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 15 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 2 0 . 0 0 $ 7 , 0 4 0 . 0 0 $ 1 1 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 5 2 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 5 . 0 0 $ 3 , 3 6 0 . 0 0 $ 2 3 5 . 0 0 $ 7 , 5 2 0 . 0 0 $ SD 5 ‐12 2 5 E A Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  Th e r m o p l a s t i c  St r i p i n g  (B i k e  Ar r o w ) ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 10 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 7 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 8 5 . 0 0 $ 4 , 6 2 5 . 0 0 $ 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 7 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ SD 5 ‐13 2 5 E A Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  Th e r m o p l a s t i c  St r i p i n g    (B i k e  Sy m b o l ) ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 15 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 $ 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 7 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 1 5 . 0 0 $ 7 , 8 7 5 . 0 0 $ SD 5 ‐14 1 9 E A Fu r n i s h  & In s t a l l  Sm a l l  Ro a d  Si g n ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r   45 0 . 0 0 $ 8 , 5 5 0 . 0 0 $ 3 5 0 . 0 0 $ 6 , 6 5 0 . 0 0 $ 4 0 0 . 0 0 $ 7 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 6 5 . 0 0 $ 6 , 9 3 5 . 0 0 $ 3 7 5 . 0 0 $ 7 , 1 2 5 . 0 0 $ SD 5 ‐15 2 4 0 L F Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  Pe r m a n e n t  En d  of  Ro a d  Ba r r i c a d e s ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 12 5 . 0 0 $ 3 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 0 . 0 0 $ 7 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 0 . 0 0 $ 7 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 6 . 0 0 $ 6 , 2 4 0 . 0 0 $ 3 3 . 0 0 $ 7 , 9 2 0 . 0 0 $ TX 6 7 2 ‐14 8 E A Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  Ra i s e d  Re f l e c t i v e  Pa v e m e n t  Ma r k e r s  Tx D O T  TY  II ‐A‐A,   Co m p l e t e  Fo r 3. 6 0 $ 1 7 2 . 8 0 $ 7 . 0 0 $ 3 3 6 . 0 0 $ 7 . 0 0 $ 3 3 6 . 0 0 $ 6 . 5 0 $ 3 1 2 . 0 0 $ 7 . 0 0 $ 3 3 6 . 0 0 $ TX 6 7 2 ‐2 3 6 7 E A Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  Ra i s e d  Re f l e c t i v e  Pa v e m e n t  Ma r k e r s  Tx D O T  TY  II ‐C‐R,   Co m p l e t e  Fo r 3. 6 0 $ 1 , 3 2 1 . 2 0 $ 7 . 0 0 $ 2 , 5 6 9 . 0 0 $ 7 . 0 0 $ 2 , 5 6 9 . 0 0 $ 6 . 5 0 $ 2 , 3 8 5 . 5 0 $ 7 . 0 0 $ 2 , 5 6 9 . 0 0 $ TX 6 7 2 ‐33 0 E A Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  Ra i s e d  Re f l e c t i v e  Pa v e m e n t  Ma r k e r s  Tx D O T  TY  I‐C,   Co m p l e t e  Fo r 3. 6 0 $ 1 0 8 . 0 0 $ 7 . 0 0 $ 2 1 0 . 0 0 $ 7 . 0 0 $ 2 1 0 . 0 0 $ 6 . 5 0 $ 1 9 5 . 0 0 $ 7 . 0 0 $ 2 1 0 . 0 0 $ TX 4 1 6 ‐1 1 4 0 L F Pr o v i d e  an d  In s t a l l  24 ‐in c h  Di a m e t e r  Dr i l l  Sh a f t s  (G e o r g e t o w n  St a n d a r d )  by   Op e n  Cu t ,  Tx D O T  It e m  41 6 ,  fo r  Il l u m i n a t i o n  As s e m b l i e s ,    Co m p l e t e  Fo r 15 0 . 0 0 $ 2 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 8 0 . 0 0 $ 2 5 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 8 0 . 0 0 $ 2 5 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 0 5 . 0 0 $ 2 8 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 o f 5 Page 100 of 104 Bi d T a b u l a t i o n Ma y s S t r e e t E x t e n s i o n P r o j e c t IT E M  DE S C R I P T I O N  & PR I C E  IN  WO R D S Un i t P r i c e T o t a l U n i t E s t i m a t e U n i t P r i c e T o t a l U n i t B i d U n i t P r i c e To t a l U n i t B i d U n i t P r i c e T o t a l U n i t B i d U n i t P r i c e T o t a l U n i t B i d IT E M  NO . ES T I M A T E D   QU A N T I T Y UN I T En g i n e e r i n g E s t i m a t e C . C . C a r l t o n J o e B l a n d C o n s t r u c t i o n C h a s c o S m i th C o n t r a c t i n g TX 4 1 6 ‐27 8 L F Pr o v i d e  an d  In s t a l l  36 ‐in c h  Di a m e t e r  Dr i l l  Sh a f t s  by  Op e n  Cu t ,  Tx D O T  It e m   41 6 ,  fo r  Tr a f f i c  Si g n a l  Po l e s ,    Co m p l e t e  Fo r 24 5 . 0 0 $ 1 9 , 1 1 0 . 0 0 $ 2 2 5 . 0 0 $ 1 7 , 5 5 0 . 0 0 $ 2 1 5 . 0 0 $ 1 6 , 7 7 0 . 0 0 $ 2 1 5 . 0 0 $ 1 6 , 7 7 0 . 0 0 $ 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ 1 9 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ TX 4 1 6 ‐34 4 L F Pr o v i d e  an d  In s t a l l  48 ‐in c h  Di a m e t e r  Dr i l l  Sh a f t s  by  Op e n  Cu t ,  Tx D O T  It e m   41 6 ,  fo r  Tr a f f i c  Si g n a l  Po l e s ,    Co m p l e t e  Fo r 37 5 . 0 0 $ 1 6 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 4 0 . 0 0 $ 1 4 , 9 6 0 . 0 0 $ 3 2 0 . 0 0 $ 1 4 , 0 8 0 . 0 0 $ 3 2 5 . 0 0 $ 1 4 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 7 5 . 0 0 $ 1 6 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ TX 6 1 8 ‐1 5 , 0 5 4 L F Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  (T r e n c h e d ) ,  2”  Sc h e d u l e  80 ,  Gr a y  El e c t r i c a l  Co n d u i t ,   Tx D O T  It e m  61 8 ,  fo r  El e c t r i c a l  Wi r i n g ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r   12 . 0 0 $ 6 0 , 6 4 8 . 0 0 $ 8 . 0 0 $ 4 0 , 4 3 2 . 0 0 $ 8 . 0 0 $ 4 0 , 4 3 2 . 0 0 $ 7 . 6 0 $ 3 8 , 4 1 0 . 4 0 $ 9 . 0 0 $ 4 5 , 4 8 6 . 0 0 $ TX 6 1 8 ‐2 9 9 5 L F Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  (B o r e d ) ,  2”  Sc h e d u l e  80 ,  Gr a y  El e c t r i c a l  Co n d u i t ,  Tx D O T   It e m  61 8 ,  fo r  El e c t r i c a l  Wi r i n g ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r   25 . 0 0 $ 2 4 , 8 7 5 . 0 0 $ 2 1 . 0 0 $ 2 0 , 8 9 5 . 0 0 $ 2 3 . 0 0 $ 2 2 , 8 8 5 . 0 0 $ 2 0 . 0 0 $ 1 9 , 9 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 3 . 0 0 $ 2 2 , 8 8 5 . 0 0 $ TX 6 1 8 ‐3 1 , 2 4 6 L F Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l    (T r e n c h e d )  3”  Sc h e d u l e  80 ,  Gr a y  El e c t r i c a l  Co n d u i t ,   Tx D O T  It e m  61 8 ,  fo r  El e c t r i c a l  Wi r i n g ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r   16 . 0 0 $ 1 9 , 9 3 6 . 0 0 $ 1 5 . 0 0 $ 1 8 , 6 9 0 . 0 0 $ 1 4 . 0 0 $ 1 7 , 4 4 4 . 0 0 $ 1 4 . 0 0 $ 1 7 , 4 4 4 . 0 0 $ 1 6 . 0 0 $ 1 9 , 9 3 6 . 0 0 $ TX 6 1 8 ‐4 1 , 9 9 0 L F Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  (B o r e d ) ,  3”  Sc h e d u l e  80 ,  Gr a y  El e c t r i c a l  Co n d u i t ,  Tx D O T   It e m  61 8 ,  fo r  El e c t r i c a l  Wi r i n g ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r   35 . 0 0 $ 6 9 , 6 5 0 . 0 0 $ 2 5 . 0 0 $ 4 9 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 $ 2 4 . 0 0 $ 4 7 , 7 6 0 . 0 0 $ 2 4 . 0 0 $ 4 7 , 7 6 0 . 0 0 $ 2 8 . 0 0 $ 5 5 , 7 2 0 . 0 0 $ TX 6 1 8 ‐58 0 L F Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l    (T r e n c h e d )  4”  Sc h e d u l e  80 ,  Gr a y  El e c t r i c a l  Co n d u i t ,   Tx D O T  It e m  61 8 ,  fo r  El e c t r i c a l  Wi r i n g ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r   30 . 0 0 $ 2 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 1 . 0 0 $ 1 , 6 8 0 . 0 0 $ 1 8 . 0 0 $ 1 , 4 4 0 . 0 0 $ 2 1 . 0 0 $ 1 , 6 8 0 . 0 0 $ TX 6 2 0 ‐13 0 L F Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  No .  6 Ba r e  El e c t r i c a l  Co n d u c t o r ,  Tx D O T  It e m  62 0 ,  in   El e c t r i c a l  Co n d u i t ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 2. 0 0 $ 6 0 . 0 0 $ 2 . 0 0 $ 6 0 . 0 0 $ 2 . 0 0 $ 6 0 . 0 0 $ 2 . 0 0 $ 6 0 . 0 0 $ 2 . 0 0 $ 6 0 . 0 0 $ TX 6 2 0 ‐26 0 L F Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  No .  6 In s u l a t e d  El e c t r i c a l  Co n d u c t o r ,  Tx D O T  It e m  62 0 ,  in   El e c t r i c a l  Co n d u i t ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 2. 0 0 $ 1 2 0 . 0 0 $ 2 . 2 0 $ 1 3 2 . 0 0 $ 2 . 0 0 $ 1 2 0 . 0 0 $ 2 . 0 0 $ 1 2 0 . 0 0 $ 2 . 5 0 $ 1 5 0 . 0 0 $ TX 6 2 0 ‐3 3 , 8 0 5 L F Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  No .  8 Ba r e  El e c t r i c a l  Co n d u c t o r ,  Tx D O T  It e m  62 0 ,  in   El e c t r i c a l  Co n d u i t ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 2. 0 0 $ 7 , 6 1 0 . 0 0 $ 1 . 5 0 $ 5 , 7 0 7 . 5 0 $ 2 . 0 0 $ 7 , 6 1 0 . 0 0 $ 1 . 1 5 $ 4 , 3 7 5 . 7 5 $ 1 . 3 0 $ 4 , 9 4 6 . 5 0 $ TX 6 2 0 ‐4 2 , 5 3 0 L F Fu r n i s h  & In s t a l l  No .  8 In s u l a t e d  El e c t r i c a l  Co n d u c t o r ,  Tx D O T  It e m  62 0 ,  in   El e c t r i c a l  Co n d u i t ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 2. 0 0 $ 5 , 0 6 0 . 0 0 $ 1 . 5 0 $ 3 , 7 9 5 . 0 0 $ 2 . 0 0 $ 5 , 0 6 0 . 0 0 $ 1 . 3 0 $ 3 , 2 8 9 . 0 0 $ 1 . 5 0 $ 3 , 7 9 5 . 0 0 $ TX 6 2 4 ‐11 0 E A Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  Tx D O T  It e m  62 4  Ty p e  D El e c t r i c a l  Pu l l  Bo x  (1 6 2 9 2 2 )  wi t h   Ap r o n ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r   1, 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 8 7 0 . 0 0 $ 8 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ TX 6 2 4 ‐21 8 E A Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  Tx D O T  It e m  62 4  Ty p e  A El e c t r i c a l  Pu l l  Bo x  (1 2 2 3 1 1 )  wi t h   Ap r o n ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r   1, 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ 2 2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 9 5 0 . 0 0 $ 1 7 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 9 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 6 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 7 9 0 . 0 0 $ 1 4 , 2 2 0 . 0 0 $ 9 1 0 . 0 0 $ 1 6 , 3 8 0 . 0 0 $ TX 6 2 8 ‐12 E A Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  Tx D O T  Ty p e  D 12 0 / 2 4 0  07 0  (N S ) A L ( E ) P S ( U )  Pe d e s t a l   El e c t r i c a l  Se r v i c e  fo r  Tr a f f i c  Si g n a l ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 4, 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 9 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 1 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ TX 6 8 0 ‐12 E A In s t a l l  Hi g h w a y  Tr a f f i c  Si g n a l  (I s o l a t e d ) ,  Tx D O T  It e m  68 0 ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 30 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 7 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ TX 6 8 2 ‐11 0 E A Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  12 ʺ  LE D  Gr e e n  Ar r o w  Si g n a l  Se c t i o n ,  Tx D O T  It e m  68 2 ,   Co m p l e t e  Fo r 22 5 . 0 0 $ 2 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 2 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 5 5 . 0 0 $ 2 , 5 5 0 . 0 0 $ TX 6 8 2 ‐21 8 E A Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  12 ʺ  LE D  Gr e e n  Ba l l  Si g n a l  Se c t i o n ,  Tx D O T  It e m  68 2 ,   Co m p l e t e  Fo r 22 5 . 0 0 $ 4 , 0 5 0 . 0 0 $ 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 2 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 9 6 0 . 0 0 $ 2 5 5 . 0 0 $ 4 , 5 9 0 . 0 0 $ TX 6 8 2 ‐31 8 E A Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  12 ʺ  LE D  Ye l l o w  Ar r o w  Si g n a l  Se c t i o n ,  Tx D O T  It e m  68 2 ,   Co m p l e t e  Fo r 22 5 . 0 0 $ 4 , 0 5 0 . 0 0 $ 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 2 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 9 6 0 . 0 0 $ 2 5 5 . 0 0 $ 4 , 5 9 0 . 0 0 $ TX 6 8 2 ‐41 8 E A Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  12 ʺ  LE D  Ye l l o w  Ba l l  Si g n a l  Se c t i o n ,  Tx D O T  It e m  68 2 ,   Co m p l e t e  Fo r 24 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 3 2 0 . 0 0 $ 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 2 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 9 6 0 . 0 0 $ 2 5 5 . 0 0 $ 4 , 5 9 0 . 0 0 $ TX 6 8 2 ‐58 E A Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  12 ʺ  LE D  Re d  Ar r o w  Si g n a l  Se c t i o n ,  Tx D O T  It e m  68 2 ,   Co m p l e t e  Fo r 22 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 7 6 0 . 0 0 $ 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 2 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 7 6 0 . 0 0 $ 2 5 5 . 0 0 $ 2 , 0 4 0 . 0 0 $ TX 6 8 2 ‐61 8 E A Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  12 ʺ  LE D  Re d  Ba l l  Si g n a l  Se c t i o n ,  Tx D O T  It e m  68 2 ,   Co m p l e t e  Fo r 23 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 1 4 0 . 0 0 $ 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 2 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 9 6 0 . 0 0 $ 2 5 5 . 0 0 $ 4 , 5 9 0 . 0 0 $ TX 6 8 2 ‐71 2 E A Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  12 ʺ  Tx D O T  It e m  68 2  LE D  Co u n t d o w n  Pe d e s t r i a n  Si g n a l   Se c t i o n ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 57 5 . 0 0 $ 6 , 9 0 0 . 0 0 $ 7 2 0 . 0 0 $ 8 , 6 4 0 . 0 0 $ 7 0 0 . 0 0 $ 8 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 8 0 . 0 0 $ 8 , 1 6 0 . 0 0 $ 7 9 0 . 0 0 $ 9 , 4 8 0 . 0 0 $ TX 6 8 2 ‐81 6 E A Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  3‐Se c t i o n  12 ʺ  Ba c k  Pl a t e ,  Tx D O T  It e m  68 2 ,  fo r  Ve h i c l e   Si g n a l  Se c t i o n s ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 75 . 0 0 $ 1 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ 9 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 4 4 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ TX 6 8 2 ‐98 E A Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  4‐Se c t i o n  12 ʺ  Ba c k  Pl a t e ,  Tx D O T  It e m  68 2 ,  fo r  Ve h i c l e   Si g n a l  Se c t i o n s ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 90 . 0 0 $ 7 2 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 5 . 0 0 $ 8 4 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 1 5 . 0 0 $ 9 2 0 . 0 0 $ TX 6 8 2 ‐10 2 E A Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  5‐Se c t i o n  12 ʺ  Ba c k  Pl a t e ,  Tx D O T  It e m  68 2 ,  fo r  Ve h i c l e   Si g n a l  Se c t i o n s ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 10 0 . 0 0 $ 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 1 5 . 0 0 $ 2 3 0 . 0 0 $ 1 1 0 . 0 0 $ 2 2 0 . 0 0 $ 1 1 0 . 0 0 $ 2 2 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2 5 . 0 0 $ 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ TX 6 8 4 ‐1 3 , 2 6 5 L F Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  Tr a f f i c  Si g n a l  Ca b l e  Tx D O T  It e m  68 4  (T y p e  A,  12  AW G ,  3  Co n d u c t o r ) ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 2. 5 0 $ 8 , 1 6 2 . 5 0 $ 1 . 5 0 $ 4 , 8 9 7 . 5 0 $ 1 . 5 0 $ 4 , 8 9 7 . 5 0 $ 1 . 3 5 $ 4 , 4 0 7 . 7 5 $ 1 . 5 0 $ 4 , 8 9 7 . 5 0 $ TX 6 8 4 ‐2 3 , 0 3 6 L F Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  Tr a f f i c  Si g n a l  Ca b l e  Tx D O T  It e m  68 4  (T y p e  A,  14  AW G ,  5  Co n d u c t o r ) ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 2. 0 0 $ 6 , 0 7 2 . 0 0 $ 1 . 6 0 $ 4 , 8 5 7 . 6 0 $ 1 . 5 0 $ 4 , 5 5 4 . 0 0 $ 1 . 5 0 $ 4 , 5 5 4 . 0 0 $ 1 . 7 5 $ 5 , 3 1 3 . 0 0 $ TX 6 8 4 ‐3 3 , 9 1 1 L F Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  Tr a f f i c  Si g n a l  Ca b l e  Tx D O T  It e m  68 4  (T y p e  A,  14  AW G ,  7  Co n d u c t o r ) ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 2. 0 0 $ 7 , 8 2 2 . 0 0 $ 1 . 7 0 $ 6 , 6 4 8 . 7 0 $ 1 . 5 0 $ 5 , 8 6 6 . 5 0 $ 1 . 6 5 $ 6 , 4 5 3 . 1 5 $ 1 . 9 0 $ 7 , 4 3 0 . 9 0 $ TX 6 8 4 ‐4 7 4 5 L F Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  Tr a f f i c  Si g n a l  Ca b l e  Tx D O T  It e m  68 4  (T y p e  A,  14  AW G ,  20   Co n d u c t o r ) ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 4. 0 0 $ 2 , 9 8 0 . 0 0 $ 5 . 3 0 $ 3 , 9 4 8 . 5 0 $ 5 . 0 0 $ 3 , 7 2 5 . 0 0 $ 5 . 0 0 $ 3 , 7 2 5 . 0 0 $ 5 . 7 5 $ 4 , 2 8 3 . 7 5 $ 3 o f 5 Page 101 of 104 Bi d T a b u l a t i o n Ma y s S t r e e t E x t e n s i o n P r o j e c t IT E M  DE S C R I P T I O N  & PR I C E  IN  WO R D S Un i t P r i c e T o t a l U n i t E s t i m a t e U n i t P r i c e T o t a l U n i t B i d U n i t P r i c e To t a l U n i t B i d U n i t P r i c e T o t a l U n i t B i d U n i t P r i c e T o t a l U n i t B i d IT E M  NO . ES T I M A T E D   QU A N T I T Y UN I T En g i n e e r i n g E s t i m a t e C . C . C a r l t o n J o e B l a n d C o n s t r u c t i o n C h a s c o S m i th C o n t r a c t i n g TX 6 8 4 ‐5 1 6 0 L F Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  Tr a f f i c  Si g n a l  Ca b l e  Tx D O T  It e m  68 4  (T y p e  A,  16  AW G ,  3  Co n d u c t o r ) ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 2. 0 0 $ 3 2 0 . 0 0 $ 1 . 4 0 $ 2 2 4 . 0 0 $ 1 . 5 0 $ 2 4 0 . 0 0 $ 1 . 2 5 $ 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 . 4 5 $ 2 3 2 . 0 0 $ TX 6 8 4 ‐6 1 , 5 3 5 L F Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  Tr a f f i c  Si g n a l  Ca b l e  Tx D O T  It e m  68 4  (T y p e  C,  14  AW G ,  2  Co n d u c t o r ) ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 2. 0 0 $ 3 , 0 7 0 . 0 0 $ 1 . 3 0 $ 1 , 9 9 5 . 5 0 $ 1 . 5 0 $ 2 , 3 0 2 . 5 0 $ 1 . 1 5 $ 1 , 7 6 5 . 2 5 $ 1 . 3 0 $ 1 , 9 9 5 . 5 0 $ TX 6 8 4 ‐7 1 , 2 0 0 L F Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  Tr a f f i c  Si g n a l  Ca b l e  Tx D O T  It e m  68 4  (T y p e  C,  18  AW G ,  2  Co n d u c t o r ) ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 3. 0 0 $ 3 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 . 1 0 $ 1 , 3 2 0 . 0 0 $ 1 . 5 0 $ 1 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 . 0 5 $ 1 , 2 6 0 . 0 0 $ 1 . 2 0 $ 1 , 4 4 0 . 0 0 $ TX 6 8 6 ‐11 E A Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  Tr a f f i c  Si g n a l  Po l e  an d  Ar m  As s e m b l y  (S t e e l )  Tx D O T  It e m   68 6  (4 0  ft .  Ar m  wi t h  Lu m i n a i r e  an d  IL S N ) ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 8, 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ 8 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ 8 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 8 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 9 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 9 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 7 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 7 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 9 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 9 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ TX 6 8 6 ‐23 E A Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  Tr a f f i c  Si g n a l  Po l e  an d  Ar m  As s e m b l y  (S t e e l )  Tx D O T  It e m   68 6  (4 4  ft .  Ar m  wi t h  Lu m i n a i r e  an d  IL S N ) ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 9, 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 7 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 8 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 5 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 9 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 7 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 9 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ 2 7 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 $ TX 6 8 6 ‐32 E A Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  Tr a f f i c  Si g n a l  Po l e  an d  Ar m  As s e m b l y  (S t e e l )  Tx D O T  It e m   68 6  (4 8  ft .  Ar m  wi t h  IL S N ) ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 8, 9 9 5 . 0 0 $ 1 7 , 9 9 0 . 0 0 $ 8 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 6 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ 9 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 7 , 9 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 5 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 9 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 8 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ TX 6 8 6 ‐41 E A Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  Tr a f f i c  Si g n a l  Po l e  an d  Ar m  As s e m b l y  (S t e e l )  Tx D O T  It e m   68 6  (5 5  ft .  Ar m  wi t h  IL S N ) ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 14 , 1 8 8 . 0 0 $ 1 4 , 1 8 8 . 0 0 $ 1 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2 , 9 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2 , 9 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ TX 6 8 6 ‐51 E A Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  Tr a f f i c  Si g n a l  Po l e  an d  Ar m  As s e m b l y  (S t e e l )  Tx D O T  It e m   68 6  (5 5  ft .  Ar m  wi t h  Lu m i n a i r e  an d  IL S N ) ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 15 , 4 1 3 . 0 0 $ 1 5 , 4 1 3 . 0 0 $ 1 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 4 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 4 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 6 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 6 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 $ TX 6 8 7 ‐1 8 E A F u r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  Pe d e s t r i a n  Po l e  As s e m b l y  Tx D O T  It e m  68 7 ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 2, 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 6 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 9 2 0 . 0 0 $ 1 5 , 3 6 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 7 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ TX 6 8 8 ‐11 2 E A Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  Pe d e s t r i a n  De t e c t o r  Pu s h  Bu t t o n s ,  Tx D O T  It e m  68 8   (A c c e s s i b l e  Pe d e s t r i a n  Si g n a l s ) ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 90 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 9 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 9 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 8 1 0 . 0 0 $ 9 , 7 2 0 . 0 0 $ 9 4 0 . 0 0 $ 1 1 , 2 8 0 . 0 0 $ TX 6 8 8 ‐22 E A Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  Pe d e s t r i a n  De t e c t o r  Co n t r o l l e r  Un i t ,  Tx D O T  It e m  68 8   (A c c e s s i b l e  Pe d e s t r i a n  Si g n a l s ) ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 3, 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 8 7 0 . 0 0 $ 5 , 7 4 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ TX 6 0 0 2 ‐13 E A Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  Vi d e o  Im a g i n g  Ve h i c l e  De t e c t i o n  Sy s t e m  (V I V D S )   Pr o c e s s o r  Sy s t e m ,  Tx D O T  It e m  60 0 2 ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 5, 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 , 9 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 0 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 $ 7 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 8 , 9 0 0 . 0 0 $ 7 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 1 , 9 0 0 . 0 0 $ TX 6 0 0 2 ‐21 0 E A Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  Vi d e o  Im a g i n g  Ve h i c l e  De t e c t i o n  Sy s t e m  (V I V D S )  Ca m e r a   As s e m b l y ,  Tx D O T  It e m  60 0 2 ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 1, 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 6 6 0 . 0 0 $ 1 6 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 9 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 9 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ TX 6 0 0 2 ‐32 E A Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  Vi d e o  Im a g i n g  Ve h i c l e  De t e c t i o n  Sy s t e m  (V I V D S )  Se t ‐Up   Sy s t e m ,  Tx D O T  It e m  60 0 2 ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 90 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 3 1 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 6 2 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ TX 6 0 0 2 ‐4 2 5 4 4 L F Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  Vi d e o  Im a g i n g  Ve h i c l e  De t e c t i o n  Sy s t e m  (V I V D S )   Co m m u n i c a t i o n  Ca b l e ,  Tx D O T  It e m  60 0 2  (C o a x i a l ) ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 3. 0 0 $ 7 , 6 3 2 . 0 0 $ 3 . 5 0 $ 8 , 9 0 4 . 0 0 $ 3 . 0 0 $ 7 , 6 3 2 . 0 0 $ 3 . 0 0 $ 7 , 6 3 2 . 0 0 $ 3 . 5 0 $ 8 , 9 0 4 . 0 0 $ 90 L F F u r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  ET H E R N E T  CA T ‐5 CA B L E  (F O R  RA D I O ) ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 4. 0 0 $ 3 6 0 . 0 0 $ 3 . 3 0 $ 2 9 7 . 0 0 $ 4 . 0 0 $ 3 6 0 . 0 0 $ 3 . 1 5 $ 2 8 3 . 5 0 $ 3 . 6 0 $ 3 2 4 . 0 0 $ 1E A Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  TI T A N  IN T E G R A T E D  BR O A D B A N D  2. 4 / 5 . 8  GH Z  RA D I O ,   Co m p l e t e  Fo r 2, 3 5 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 3 5 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 4 4 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 4 4 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1E A Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  BR O A D B A N D  AN T E N N A ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 43 5 . 0 0 $ 4 3 5 . 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 9 2 0 . 0 0 $ 9 2 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 E A F u r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  OP T I C O M  DE T E C T O R  ‐   GT T  MO D E L  76 4 ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 1, 1 2 1 . 0 0 $ 2 , 2 4 2 . 0 0 $ 1 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 3 1 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 6 2 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1E A Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  OP T I C O M  PH A S E  SE L E C T O R  ‐   GT T  MO D E L  76 4 ,   Co m p l e t e  Fo r 3, 5 2 9 . 0 0 $ 3 , 5 2 9 . 0 0 $ 3 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 4 1 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 4 1 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 E A F u r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  OP T I C O M  CA R D  RA C K  ‐   GT T  MO D E L  76 0 ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 61 5 . 0 0 $ 6 1 5 . 0 0 $ 4 7 0 . 0 0 $ 4 7 0 . 0 0 $ 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 5 0 . 0 0 $ 4 5 0 . 0 0 $ 5 1 5 . 0 0 $ 5 1 5 . 0 0 $ 63 0 L F Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  OP T I C O M  CA B L E  ‐   GT T  MO D E L  13 8 ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 3. 0 0 $ 1 , 8 9 0 . 0 0 $ 3 . 0 0 $ 1 , 8 9 0 . 0 0 $ 3 . 0 0 $ 1 , 8 9 0 . 0 0 $ 2 . 2 0 $ 1 , 3 8 6 . 0 0 $ 2 . 5 0 $ 1 , 5 7 5 . 0 0 $ TX 6 0 9 0 ‐18 E A LE D  In t e r n a l l y  Il l u m i n a t e d  St r e e t  Na m e  Si g n s  (I L S N )  Tx D O T  It e m  60 9 0   (D o u b l e  Si d e d ,  8 ft . ) ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 3, 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 7 3 0 . 0 0 $ 2 9 , 8 4 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 4 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 $ W3 ‐11 E A Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  To o l s  an d  Ma t e r i a l s  to  Re l o c a t e  Ex i s t i n g  Fi r e  Hy d r a n t ,   Co m p l e t e  Fo r 2, 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ W3 ‐26 E A Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  To o l s  an d  Ma t e r i a l s  to  Ad j u s t  Ex i s t i n g  Wa t e r  Va l v e ,   Co m p l e t e  Fo r 75 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 8 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 6 8 0 . 0 0 $ 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 7 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 2 2 0 . 0 0 $ 7 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ W3 ‐31 E A Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  To o l s  an d  Ma t e r i a l s  to  Re l o c a t e  Ex i s t i n g  Wa t e r  Li n e  Ai r   Re l e a s e  Va l v e ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 5, 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 1 5 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 1 5 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 1 5 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 1 5 0 . 0 0 $ WW 1 ‐14 E A Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  To o l s  an d  Ma t e r i a l s  to  Ad j u s t  Ex i s t i n g  Wa s t e  Wa t e r   Ma n h o l e ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 1, 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 6 3 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 , 5 2 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ WW 3 ‐11 E A Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  To o l s  an d  Ma t e r i a l s  to  Re l o c a t e  Ex i s t i n g  Wa s t e  Wa t e r  Ve n t   Pi p e  (4 ʺ),  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 5, 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 1 2 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 1 2 0 . 0 0 $ RR 5 1 0 ‐1W 2 5 L F Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  To o l s ,  Ma t e r i a l s  an d  Fi t t i n g s  to  Ex t e n d  12 ʺ  PV C  C‐90 0   Wa t e r  li n e ,  te s t ,  an d  pl u g ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 10 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 5 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 $ 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 5 . 0 0 $ 2 , 6 2 5 . 0 0 $ 1 3 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ RR 5 1 1 ‐1W 1 E A Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  To o l s  an d  Ma t e r i a l s  to  Re l o c a t e  Ex i s t i n g  Wa t e r  Li n e  Ai r   Re l e a s e  Va l v e ,  Co m p l e t e  Fo r 5, 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 1 5 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 1 5 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 1 5 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 1 5 0 . 0 0 $ 4 o f 5 Page 102 of 104 Bi d T a b u l a t i o n Ma y s S t r e e t E x t e n s i o n P r o j e c t IT E M  DE S C R I P T I O N  & PR I C E  IN  WO R D S Un i t P r i c e T o t a l U n i t E s t i m a t e U n i t P r i c e T o t a l U n i t B i d U n i t P r i c e To t a l U n i t B i d U n i t P r i c e T o t a l U n i t B i d U n i t P r i c e T o t a l U n i t B i d IT E M  NO . ES T I M A T E D   QU A N T I T Y UN I T En g i n e e r i n g E s t i m a t e C . C . C a r l t o n J o e B l a n d C o n s t r u c t i o n C h a s c o S m i th C o n t r a c t i n g Ba s e  Bi d En g i n e e r i n g E s t i m a t e C . C . C a r l t o n J o e B l a n d C o n s t r u c t i o n C h a s c o S m i th C o n t r a c t i n g A M O U N T T O T A L A M O U N T T O T A L A M O U N T T O T A L A M O U N T T O T A L A M O U N T T O T A L 7, 2 9 4 , 4 4 2 . 4 0 $                        6 , 2 8 1 , 1 2 0 . 8 8 $      6 , 4 8 6 , 5 8 4 . 3 0 $      6 , 8 5 6 , 3 3 9 . 3 0 $      7 , 5 9 4 , 7 2 0 . 3 5 $      % O v e r / U n d e r -1 4 % - 1 1 % - 6 % 4 % AL T E R N A T E  BI D  No .  1 IT E M  DE S C R I P T I O N  & PR I C E  IN  WO R D S Un i t P r i c e T o t a l U n i t E s t i m a t e U n i t P r i c e T o t a l U n i t B i d U n i t P r i c e To t a l U n i t B i d U n i t P r i c e T o t a l U n i t B i d U n i t P r i c e T o t a l U n i t B i d W4 ‐1 2 2 4 L F Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  To o l s  an d  Ma t e r i a l s  fo r  St e e l  En c a s e m e n t  Pi p e  sl e e v e s  (3 0 ʺ),   Lo c a t i o n s  of  sl e e v e s  to  be  de t e r m i n e d  by  th e  En g i n e e r .  Pa y m e n t  sh a l l  on l y  be   ma d e  at  th e  di r e c t i o n  an d  app ro v a l  of  th e  En gin e e r ,  Co m ple t e  Fo r 13 0 . 0 0 $ 2 9 , 1 2 0 . 0 0 $ 1 5 4 . 0 0 $ 3 4 , 4 9 6 . 0 0 $ 1 7 0 . 0 0 $ 3 8 , 0 8 0 . 0 0 $ 1 4 3 . 0 0 $ 3 2 , 0 3 2 . 0 0 $ 1 8 0 . 0 0 $ 4 0 , 3 2 0 . 0 0 $ W4 ‐2 1 1 2 L F Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  To o l s  an d  Ma t e r i a l s  fo r  St e e l  En c a s e m e n t  Pi p e  sl e e v e s  (1 8 ʺ),   Lo c a t i o n s  of  sl e e v e s  to  be  de t e r m i n e d  by  th e  En g i n e e r .  Pa y m e n t  sh a l l  on l y  be   ma d e  at  th e  di r e c t i o n  an d  app ro v a l  of  th e  En gin e e r ,  Co m ple t e  Fo r 10 0 . 0 0 $ 1 1 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 7 5 . 0 0 $ 8 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2 5 . 0 0 $ 1 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 2 . 0 0 $ 1 1 , 4 2 4 . 0 0 $ 1 1 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2 , 3 2 0 . 0 0 $ TX 6 1 8 ‐6 1 1 2 0 L F Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  (T r e n c h e d ) ,  8”  Sc h e d u l e  40 ,  Gr a y  El e c t r i c a l  Co n d u i t ,   Tx D O T  It e m  61 8 ,  fo r  El e c t r i c a l  Wi r i n g .  Lo c a t i o n s  of  sl e e v e s  to  be  de t e r m i n e d   by  th e  En g i n e e r .  Pa y m e n t  sh a l l  on l y  be  ma d e  at  th e  di r e c t i o n  an d  ap p r o v a l  of   th e  En gin e e r ,  Co m ple t e  Fo r 50 . 0 0 $ 5 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 4 . 0 0 $ 3 8 , 0 8 0 . 0 0 $ 2 4 . 0 0 $ 2 6 , 8 8 0 . 0 0 $ 2 4 . 0 0 $ 2 6 , 8 8 0 . 0 0 $ 3 0 . 0 0 $ 3 3 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ TX 6 1 8 ‐7 4 4 8 L F Fu r n i s h  an d  In s t a l l  (T r e n c h e d ) ,  6”  Sc h e d u l e  40 ,  Gr a y  Te l e c o m m u n i c a t i o n   Co n d u i t ,  Tx D O T  It e m  61 8 ,  fo r  Co m m u n i c a t i o n  Wi r i n g .  Lo c a t i o n s  of  sl e e v e s  to   be  de t e r m i n e d  by  th e  En g i n e e r .  Pa y m e n t  sh a l l  on l y  be  ma d e  at  th e  di r e c t i o n   an d  app ro v a l  of  th e  En gin e e r ,  Co m ple t e  Fo r 40 . 0 0 $ 1 7 , 9 2 0 . 0 0 $ 2 9 . 0 0 $ 1 2 , 9 9 2 . 0 0 $ 2 0 . 0 0 $ 8 , 9 6 0 . 0 0 $ 2 0 . 0 0 $ 8 , 9 6 0 . 0 0 $ 2 5 . 0 0 $ 1 1 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ Al t e r n a t e  Bi d  No .  1 En g i n e e r i n g E s t i m a t e C . C . C a r l t o n J o e B l a n d C o n s t r u c t i o n C h a s c o S m i th C o n t r a c t i n g A M O U N T T O T A L A M O U N T T O T A L A M O U N T T O T A L A M O U N T T O T A L A M O U N T T O T A L 11 4 , 2 4 0 . 0 0 $                              9 3 , 9 6 8 . 0 0 $                8 7 , 9 2 0 . 0 0 $                7 9 , 2 9 6 . 0 0 $                9 7 , 4 4 0 . 0 0 $                % O v e r / U n d e r -1 8 % - 2 3 % - 3 1 % - 1 5 % To t a l  Bi d En g i n e e r i n g E s t i m a t e C . C . C a r l t o n J o e B l a n d C o n s t r u c t i o n C h a s c o S m i th C o n t r a c t i n g A M O U N T T O T A L A M O U N T T O T A L A M O U N T T O T A L A M O U N T T O T A L A M O U N T T O T A L 7, 4 0 8 , 6 8 2 . 4 0 $                        6 , 3 7 5 , 0 8 8 . 8 8 $      6 , 5 7 4 , 5 0 4 . 3 0 $      6 , 9 3 5 , 6 3 5 . 3 0 $      7 , 6 9 2 , 1 6 0 . 3 5 $      % O v e r / U n d e r -1 4 % - 1 1 % - 6 % 4 % IT E M  NO . ES T I M A T E D   QU A N T I T Y UN I T En g i n e e r i n g E s t i m a t e C . C . C a r l t o n J o e B l a n d C o n s t r u c t i o n C h a s c o S m i th C o n t r a c t i n g 5 o f 5 Page 103 of 104 City of Georgetown, Texas Transportation Enhancement Corp July 20, 2016 SUBJECT: Cons id eration and p o s s ib le ac tion award ing a tas k o rd er to Terracon Co nsultants , Inc ., of Austin, Texas fo r c o nstruc tio n materials testing and observatio n fo r the Mays Street Extens ion in the amo unt o f $63,320.00 -- Wes ley Wright, P.E., Systems Engineering Directo r ITEM SUMMARY: This task order will provid e c o nstruc tion materials tes ting and observation fo r the Mays Street Extens io n (Wes tingho us e R o ad to Bass Pro Drive). As part of this sc o p e, Terrac o n will obs erve earthwo rk & mas s grading effo rts , as well as ensure proper comp ac tio n s ubgrad e material. They will als o cond uc t concrete compressive tes ting, water quality pond liner p ermeab ility tes ts, and asphalt batc h plant lab o ratory wo rk. All thes e tes ts are nec es s ary as part of the ro ad way projec t to ensure quality c ons tructio n and that p ro vided materials meet spec ified c riteria. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Materials testing will cos t $63,320 for Mays S treet and funds are includ ed in the projec t b udget. SUBMITTED BY: Wes ley Wright Page 104 of 104