HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda_ARTAB_10.21.2014Notice of Meeting for the
Arts and Culture Advisory Board
of the City of Georgetown
October 21, 2014 at 4:30 PM
at Small conference room, 2nd floor, Georgetown Public Library, 402 W. 8th Street
The City of Georgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If
you require assistance in participating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the ADA,
reasonable assistance, adaptations, or accommodations will be provided upon request. Please contact the
City at least four (4) days prior to the scheduled meeting date, at (512) 930-3652 or City Hall at 113 East
8th Street for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711.
Regular Session
(This Regular Session may, at any time, be recessed to convene an Executive Session for any purpose
authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code 551.)
A Citizens who wish to address the Board. As of the deadline, no persons were signed up to speak on
items other than what was posted on the agenda.
B Announcements of upcoming events.
C Consideration and approval of minutes of September 16, 2014 Arts and Culture Board meeting.
D Report regarding the operation of the Georgetown Art Center from September 16, 2014 through
October 20, 2014. -- Eric Lashley, Gary Anderson
E Report and possible action regarding expenditure of funds from the Arts and Culture Board budget --
Judy Fabry, Eric Lashley
F Report on Art and Wine in the Square event survey of artists. --Eric Lashley, Gary Anderson.
G Consideration and possible action regarding proposed mural and mural subcommittee for library plaza.
--Eric Lashley
H Review of final reports submitted by the nonprofit arts organizations that received grants in 2014. --
Judy Fabry
I Report concerning the Texans for the Arts legislative initiative for funding the Texas Commission on
the Arts Cultural District. --Eric Lashley, Amanda Still
J Consideration and possible action to fund a public art project in November 2014 --Eric Lashley.
K Consideration of dates of coming meetings -- Eric Lashley
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
I, Jessica Brettle, City Secretary for the City of Georgetown, Texas, do hereby certify that this Notice of
Meeting was posted at City Hall, 113 E. 8th Street, a place readily accessible to the general public at all
times, on the ______ day of __________________, 2014, at __________, and remained so posted for at
least 72 continuous hours preceding the scheduled time of said meeting.
____________________________________
Jessica Brettle, City Secretary
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Citizens who wish to address the Board. As of the deadline, no persons were signed up to speak on
items other than what was posted on the agenda.
ITEM SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
This item has no direct financial impact.
SUBMITTED BY:
Lawren Weiss
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Announcements of upcoming events.
ITEM SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
This item has no direct financial impact.
SUBMITTED BY:
Lawren Weiss
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Consideration and approval of minutes of September 16, 2014 Arts and Culture Board meeting.
ITEM SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
This item has no financial impact.
SUBMITTED BY:
Lawren Weiss
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Minutes September 2014 Backup Material
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Report regarding the operation of the Georgetown Art Center from September 16, 2014 through
October 20, 2014. -- Eric Lashley, Gary Anderson
ITEM SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
This item has no direct financial impact.
SUBMITTED BY:
Lawren Weiss
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Report and possible action regarding expenditure of funds from the Arts and Culture Board budget
-- Judy Fabry, Eric Lashley
ITEM SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
This item has no direct financial impact.
SUBMITTED BY:
Lawren Weiss
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Budget Summary Sept. 2014 Backup Material
Budget Breakdown Sept. 2014 Backup Material
Date Item Amount Balance
10/10/2013 Sponsorship of Chadwick & Spector 50,000
exhibit @ Art Center 2,500 47,500
& reimbursement for printing of Benini
materials PO 3400163 1,000 46,500
10/14/2013 Printing invitations for ribbon-cutting 432.94 46,067
10/17/2013 Sun McColgin honorarium 300.00 45,767
Pokey Park honorarium 300.00 45,467 Art Center expense ($10,000 budgeted)
Micheal Epps honorarium 300.00 45,167 Marketing/promo ($10,000 budgeted)
Terry M. Jones honorarium (2 pieces)600.00 44,567 Events/receptions ($2,000 budgeted)
10/21/2013 Nick Ramos 10/18/13 ribbon-cutting invite 150.00 44,417 Public art/Sculp Tour ($10,000 budgeted)
10/26/2013 JF MC charges for ribbon-cutting recep.696.62 43,720 Scholarships & Grants ($17,000 budgeted)
11/13/2013 Micheal Epps honorarium 300.00 43,420 Training & Administration ($1,000 budgeted)
12/2/2013 Purchase of Queen of Scotland 3822.00 39,598
12/9/2013 Matt Graves, Art Center video 250.00 39,348
1/13/2014 D&L Printing, sculpture tour brochures 888.05 38,460
1/23/2014 Georgetown Art Works, gift for J. Estes 50.00 38,410
1/22/2014 Faith Schnexnayder honorarium 300.00 38,110
1/22/2014 Dar Richardson honorarium 300.00 37,810
1/28/2014 D&L Printing, Art Galleries rack cards 132.10 37,678
1/27/2014 grant to Wmson Co Symph Orch 2000.00 35,678
1/27/2014 grant to Georgetown Symp Society 3000.00 32,678
2/4/2014 grant to EVHS Percussion Program 500.00 32,178
2/4/2014 GTX plaques for (2) library sculptures 58.75 32,120
2/17/2014 grant to Community Montessori 1500.00 30,620
2/24/2014 GTX plaques (repl Pokey Park/Shaman)15.00 30,605
2/25/2014 Affordable Signs (signage on 3 doors)175.00 30,430
3/3/2014 grant to Georgetown Festival of the Arts 3000.00 27,430
3/10/2014 Affordable Signs (addtl signage)31.75 27,398
4/16/2014 Williamson Museum (sculpture)2500.00 24,898
6/2/2014 Texas Society of Sculptors (prize money)1800.00 23,098
6/2/2014 grant to Palace Theater 2500.00 20,598
6/3/2014 Georgetown Art Center, Snell & Benini 2125.00 18,473
6/10/2014 IntroVisuals TX (Google map virtual tour)550.00 17,923
6/19/2014 Georgetown Art Center, Snell painting 1050.00 16,873
6/25/2014 Sweetwater (2) wireless PA systems 479.98 16,393
6/23/2014 Jack Johnson Construction (airport pads)650.00 15,743
8/7/2014 Bob Ragan (sculpture honorarium, airport)300.00 15,443
Terry Jones (sculptures honorarium, airport)600.00 14,843
8/11/2014 GTX Awards (plaques for sculptures)45.00 14,798
8/25/2014 Affordable Signs (Art Ctr emerg exit)32.84 14,765
9/4/2014 PO 3404440 Art Center equip 3600.00 11,165
9/11/2014 po3404533 Ideal Signs/Cult Dist banners 3000.00 8,165
9/11/2014 LB MC to DPS/bkgd cks for Art Center vol 102.76 8,062
9/15/2014 PO 3404571 Graphismo/design banners 2000.00 6,062
9/29/2014 GTX Awards (plaques for sculptures)38.99 6,023
9/29/2014 grant to Vivace Youth Orchestra 1350.00 4,673
grant to Williamson Museum 725.00 3,948
grant to Georgetown Symp Society 725.00 3,223
grant to Gtwn Festival of the Arts 725.00 2,498
grant to Gtwn Palace Theatre 725.00 1,773
grant to Wmson Co Symph Orch 725.00 1,048
9/29/2014 PO3404699 Wmson Co Sun ads 882.39 165.83
Arts & Culture Board Expenses FY 2013-14
Art Center Marketing/Events/Public Art/Scholarships/Training &
Balance Promotion Balance Receptions Balance Sculpture Tour Balance Grants Balance Admin Balance
Starting $10,000.00 Starting $10,000.00 Starting $2,000.00 Starting $10,000.00 Starting $17,000.00 Starting $1,000.00
$2,500.00 $7,500.00 $888.05 $9,111.95 $432.94 $1,567.06 $300.00 $9,700.00 $2,000.00 $15,000.00 $50.00 $950.00
$1,000.00 $6,500.00 $132.10 $8,979.85 $150.00 $1,417.06 $300.00 $9,400.00 $3,000.00 $12,000.00 45.00$ $905.00
$250.00 $6,250.00 3,000.00$ $5,979.85 $696.62 $720.44 $300.00 $9,100.00 $500.00 $11,500.00 847.33 $57.67
$206.75 $6,043.25 2,000.00$ $3,979.85 720.00 $0.44 $600.00 $8,500.00 $1,500.00 $10,000.00 50 $7.67
$2,125.00 $3,918.25 162.00 $3,817.85 $300.00 $8,200.00 $3,000.00 $7,000.00
$550.00 $3,368.25 3625.00 $192.85 $3,822.00 $4,378.00 $2,500.00 $4,500.00
$479.98 $2,888.27 39.00 $153.85 $300.00 $4,078.00 trf $2500 to Pub Art $2,000.00
$32.84 $2,855.43 $300.00 $3,778.00 trf $700 to pub art 1,300.00$
$3,702.76 ($847.33)$58.75 $3,719.25 $1,300.00 $0.00
see Trng & admin $15.00 $3,704.25
add $2500 < S&G $6,204.25
$2,500.00 $3,704.25
$1,800.00 $1,904.25
$1,050.00 $854.25
$650.00 $204.25
add $700 < S & G $904.25
$900 $4.25
9/15/2014 used balance remaining in Art Center plus $847.33 from Training and Admin to cover $3600 for Art Center wish list and $102.76 for bkgd checks for Art Center volunteers
9/29/2014 used remaining balances to pay for year-end grants, ads in Sun, and plaque for airport sculpture
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Report on Art and Wine in the Square event survey of artists. --Eric Lashley, Gary Anderson.
ITEM SUMMARY:
To better understand what motivates artists to participate in events in which their art may be sold
and to determine whether participants in the Art and Wine in the Square event on September 29-30
were satisfied with their experience, Board member Gary Anderson surveyed the artists who were
there. The compilation of the results of his survey is attached.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
This item has no direct financial impact.
SUBMITTED BY:
Lawren Weiss
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Survey Results 2014 Art and Wine on the Square Event Backup Material
Artist SurveyGeorgetown Arts & Culture Board
Please circle the response that best describes your experience at 2014 Art & Wine in the Square.
For Art & Wine in the Square, I traveled:
<50 miles 51-100 miles 100-250 miles 250-500 miles 500+ miles
Considering weather and other factors as well as my experience so far in 2014, attendance at my booth was
Far below average Below average Average Above average Far above average
Considering the shows I have experienced so far in 2014, sales at my booth were
Far below average Below average Average Above average Far above average
Considering other shows I have experienced, A&WitS was promoted, organized, and planned adequately.
Strongly disagree Disagree Not sure Agree Strongly agree
In my experience, I prefer shows that feature:
Compact show layout with less storage Loose show layout with more storage
In my experience, and considering my history of art sales, I prefer shows that feature:
An art-patron approach (lower potential attendance) A general-attendance approach (higher potential attendance)
In my experience, I prefer shows that feature:
An entrance fee with controlled access No entrance fee and open access
Please rank 1-4 with 1 as most preferred and 4 as least preferred. I prefer to keep booth fees low by:
_____ Limiting Marketing/Promotions _____ Limiting number of non-artist promo/sales booths
_____ Limiting judging/jury expenses _____ Limiting artist amenities, hospitality
Are you currently represented by one or more galleries?
Yes No
Feedback from artists is very important to us. Please provide your suggestions & comments below. Thank you!
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
44% 9% 22% 9% 16%
22% 31% 22% 16% 3%
31% 28% 13% 19% 3%
3% 9% 28% 34% 16%
19% 69%
34% 47%
25% 63%
0% 60%
28% 3%
50% 44%
Artist Survey Results
Art & Wine in the SquareGeorgetown, TexasSeptember 26-28, 2014
Number of artists promoted in ads: 50Number of artists listed on brochure: 43Number of artists attending: 33Survey response: 32 of 33 or 97%
Artists with whom I spoke commented favorably on the relaxed, laid-back, friendly atmosphere and lay-out of the event. Several commented on the attractive Square and historic buildings. A number mentioned they liked the ease of loading, unloading, and parking.
Unfavorable comments included how visitors seemed to simply “stumble” upon the show and were not expecting higher quality work at higher prices and that there were few motivated buyers for items other than jewelry.
Written Responses: 25
• Like that every booth is a corner booth - makes for more light and visual openness.
• It seems to be a well run show. Everyone(staff) has been very nice. Parking has been great. If you could figure out how to install buzzers in the peoples seats to get them to come outside, that would be great. All is well here as far as we can tell. Thanks for having us.
• I understand several artists cancelled - but would like to have seen more variety and more integration of artists i.e. not most of jew-elers in a cluster. Also, spread show out more and add another 50-100 artists. Make it worth visitors’ trip to shop and see more.
• This was my first show in Texas! It was a good show. I’ve been showing in Michigan for the past 5 yrs. but have moved to Texas and I am looking for shows that are a good fit for me.
• If you knew people were not coming, you should have put the booths together. There were way too many blank spaces for 7th St. And too much jewelry on the end. Put wine tent in middle and art tents on both ends.
• The show was very profitable for me and the people of Georgetown are wonderful - I did however hear quite often that they had no idea the show was going on and that they just stumbled across us. Perhaps more/better local advertising.
• We liked the organization of the event. It would have been nicer to have the music events around the square not only on one side.
• Planning this fair at the same time as Pecan St. Festival in Austin caused low attendance.
• Probably because Pecan Street Festival was this weekend attendance was lower. However, I love to participate in show in George-town, especially ones with very few commercial vendors.
• Better communication. Less expenses. More ads.
• I thought it was great idea to have a wine festival like you did at the same time as the art show. Buyers were fun, relaxed & willing to buy. The evening hours were very successful for this reason. I haven’t done this show before so I have no previous years to com-pare to. But would come back if juried in again. Pleased so far! Not sure if the show was promoted in Austin. Quite a few people who came were coming to Georgetown for something else.
• This venue is very nice, comfortable, friendly, just wondering where everyone is considering the wonderful weather.
• Need to promote more instead of booklet; maybe a banner or two throughout town!
• We were in front of the toy store which had a floor display piano keyboard. It was quite noisy and distracting, 2 adults and several children tripped and fell down on it. They graciously removed it for Sunday!
• I think this work better as a craft fair. Not an art crowd.
• I was disappointed how many customers didn’t know what our event was and just come upon it. Also, the Facebook page had 2012 information and wasn’t updated. I liked my location with sun. The cold water was great.
• Beautiful weather - just did not work for artists - wine looked like more attendance.
• I thought the wine event combined w/ the art show was a great idea, seemed to help attendance.
• This is by far the worst fair in terms of sales we have ever been to. There were very few active buyers - not sure why.
• Consistency of show times in promotions; more access to garbage cans; recycle cans
• Show is well run. People are nice but I believe my price is too high for this market.
• Really like having electric power source without extra cost; access to load & unload; enjoyed music background- could have been a little louder.
• Good as it could be.
• Good service; booth design is reasonable.
• I did this show more for PR than sales - hope to build sales later.
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Consideration and possible action regarding proposed mural and mural subcommittee for library
plaza. --Eric Lashley
ITEM SUMMARY:
The proposed mural will be on the northeast wall of the library plaza, which is located outside of
the Red Poppy Cafe. The wall is not library property, but the property owner is willing to allow
the mural.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Funding for this item would come from the Arts and Culture Board's regular budget for public art.
SUBMITTED BY:
Lawren Weiss
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Review of final reports submitted by the nonprofit arts organizations that received grants in 2014.
--Judy Fabry
ITEM SUMMARY:
All grantees submitted final reports before the designated deadline. They also appeared before
Council to express their appreciation for the City's support.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
This item has no direct financial impact.
SUBMITTED BY:
Lawren Weiss
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Report concerning the Texans for the Arts legislative initiative for funding the Texas Commission
on the Arts Cultural District. --Eric Lashley, Amanda Still
ITEM SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
This item has no direct financial impact.
SUBMITTED BY:
Lawren Weiss
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Arts Funding and Leadership Development Backup Material
Arts Funding and Leadership Development
Attending the Arts Funding and Leadership Development Workshop
organized by the Texans for the Arts has infused me with renewed hope
for our emerging GAW non-profit organization! I feel that one of the most
important components of GAW that has yet to be developed is an effective
fundraising task force. So the presentation entitled, “Developing a
Fundraising Board and the Seven Faces of Philanthropy”, was something I
just had to sit in on! What’s even better is that these philosophies and
fundraising techniques used for non-profits can also be applied as sales
and marketing strategies for artists and art businesses. Because while
operating my business, I have quickly found that selling artwork is one of
the absolute most difficult products to sell…especially if it is high end art.
Very rarely will a retail customer simply purchase a large, expensive piece
of art. So to sell art, it’s more about building relationships and cultivating
“donors” or “clients” (not customers); marketing to a specific target
audience. And this is exactly what this presentation was about.
The presentation was given by Cookie Gregory Ruiz. She is currently
the Executive Director of Ballet Austin after promotion to the position in
1999. She had previously served as Ballet Austin’s Development Director
in charge of fundraising since 1996. During her presentation, she did speak
about the logistics of developing a strong executive board, but of most
interest to me was her outline of the donor development cycle and the
seven faces of philanthropy. So I will quickly share these steps along with
the seven donor profiles.
Step I: Assessment – Identify and qualify donor prospects
Step II: Cultivation/Courtship – Develop and build relationships with
qualified prospects and share the mission of the organization through
invitations to organization events that include a high end ambience
surrounded by good food, wine, music, and beautiful florals. Positive
contact must be made with the prospect 5-7 times before they are asked to
give a monetary donation!
Step III: The Ask: Solicitation for the monetary donation
Step IV: Stewardship – The obligation to acknowledge the gift with
different types of recognition 5-7 more times over the course of a year
before donors are asked again for money. IE…thank you notes, certificates,
public acknowledgment at beautiful events…
So there was a book written about seven major types of donors, The Seven
Faces of Philanthropy: a New Approach to Cultivating Major Donors by
Russ Alan Prince and Karen Maru File. These donor profiles are very
helpful in tailoring events to appeal to the different types of philanthropic
people.
I. The Communitarian: “Doing good makes sense”; “The success of the
organization is tied to the success of the community which is tied to the
success of my business which makes me happy”; I am an example of this.
II. The Devout: Mostly religious motivation; The idea that “not everything
I earn belongs to me”
III. The Investor: Wants to see a return on investment; Philanthropy is a
business relationship, and tax avoidance is a high motivator. i.e. My
husband - “we are reaching the end of the year, and we need to burn some
cash to avoid a high tax penalty”; But they do not want to just throw
money away. They like to see their investments flourish.
IV. The Socialite: “Doing good is fun”; Not big monetary donors; but can
bring big donors. They are good to have at events to work the crowd.
V. The Repayer: The principle of giving back; they like to give to
organizations with good educational programs and also have an element of
“giving back” to the community; ie…community art centers that make art
accessible to the average consumer; Carol Light who is painting (10) 5x7
canvases for Gallery Georgetown; Denise Armstrong and Joanna Davis
who hosted an art collector series, bought a Benini, and bought a $5,000
piece of artwork from me
VI. The Altruist: Genuinely selfless donors who feel the wealthy have a
greater obligation to give; they are not influenced by others and are usually
the anonymous donors
V. The Dynast: Doing good is a family tradition; “Old Money”; focus on
the core mission of institutions such as education and the “giving back”
concept
*************************************************************************************
So with all that I have learned from this workshop, I would like to share
with you why I have renewed hope in the fundraising capabilities of GAW
and why I feel that Gallery Georgetown incorporates so many of the
fundraising concepts shared in the workshop as well as used by other
successful non-profits.
I. This is a major fundraising event that gives GAW the opportunity to
showcase the core mission and values of their non-profit to many different
types of qualified donor prospects. So this fulfills Step I of the
Development Cycle: Cultivation/Building Relationships; GAW has mailed
very nice invitations to their target market of qualified prospective donors.
This mailing list also consists of 50 qualified prospects from each
participating venue.
II. This event also qualifies for Step 4: Stewardship; as the Art Center
celebrates its first year in operation, they are taking the opportunity to
thank the major donors and volunteers publicly
III. The “Faces of Philanthropy” that Gallery Georgetown is marketing to
with a goal to build relationships with include:
A. The Communitarian: The concept of having artists contribute
small 5x7 canvas panels to be sold at an affordable price of $25 is an
example of an artist community working together to raise funds for the
community art center while making art accessible and affordable to the
community. Communitarians love this because they operate from the idea
that “what is good for the community is good for me”. (A quick note:
these 5x7 canvas panels are not to be considered fine art; that is why the
artists do not include their signatures on the front. They are indeed a “gift”
item...so it’s a totally different consumer product than high end fine art.
Austin 5x7’s go for $100 each, but we decided on the price of $25 because
we learned that we priced ourselves out of the market the first year with
the $50 posters. They didn’t sell and we lost approx. $300 that year.)
B. The Investor: Usually I would categorize myself as a
Communitarian, but in the case of Gallery Georgetown, I am actually an
investor! Here is why…as an art business owner in Georgetown, I have
discovered that there is a very limited market for high end art, and it’s
definitely not enough to sustain my overhead. Gallery Georgetown
represents one of the City’s goals for economic development by making
Georgetown a destination city. They recognize that for our downtown
boutique businesses and other emerging high end businesses to thrive, we
cannot rely on the current Georgetown market, unfortunately. Because of
marketing investments by the City, Gallery Georgetown has brought much,
new out-of-town exposure to our art businesses.
Examples: the first year, Fred Bolgen of Framer’s Gallery was against
having Gallery Georgetown on the Saturday after First Friday because he
was satisfied with the sales he usually got from the First Friday event and
that his people would not come out two nights in a row. He called me after
Gallery Georgetown and thanked me for sticking with it because he got a
totally different crowd than First Friday and was very happy about it. The
second year of Gallery Georgetown was my best attended event with the
most sales ever! When I see the investments made by the City and the
results we’ve had so far, I will definitely invest in Gallery Georgetown this
year because of the exposure and opportunity to build relationships with a
more targeted art market. So I have purchased 7 small pieces of fine
artwork from my artists to donate to the Gallery Georgetown silent
auction…
C. The Socialite: no elaboration needed here!
D. The Repayer: The Repayer likes to give to organizations that provide
educational opportunities. There is an educational component in Gallery
Georgetown in that the Art Center is accepting 5x7 canvases from art
students as well as community members interested in the arts…this
provides an educational opportunity in selling their product. I also have
the advanced art class students at Bremond ISD each painting a 5x7…the
instructor has made the project part of their curriculum.
The Repayer also likes to give back to organizations that support causes
that have helped them succeed. Examples would be the artists that I have
asked to participate by painting 5x7 canvases. I only asked artists that I
have been successful in selling their product. These artists are very happy
to contribute, and each one offered to paint more canvases than I asked
them to! Carol Light, my most successful artist, painted 10 canvases! She
says that not only is it for a good cause, but the success of the Art Center
means success for our local art community.
E. The Dynast: Gallery Georgetown may be a small component of
motivation for this type of philanthropist. Gallery Georgetown does fulfill
two of the core missions of the Art Center: making art accessible to the
public and providing educational opportunities to the public…examples
have been mentioned above.
In closing I would like to mention that at least 10% of a non-profit group’s
operating budget should come from governmental entities. So I would like
to extend an invitation to each of you to attend Gallery Georgetown this
year in order to see the event in action and decide for yourselves if an Arts
& Culture Board grant toward Gallery Georgetown expenses for the Art
Center is a worthy investment for the Arts & Culture Board.
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Consideration and possible action to fund a public art project in November 2014 --Eric Lashley.
ITEM SUMMARY:
This public art project is a traveling memorial for the victims of terrorism. It is called Letters of
Sacrifice and is the work of artist Jenn Hassin. You can see the piece at www.jennhassin.com.
The charge to display it in Georgetown for one month is $1200.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
If approved by the Arts and Culture Board, the $1200 would be paid from the Board's regular
budget for public art.
SUBMITTED BY:
Lawren Weiss
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Consideration of dates of coming meetings -- Eric Lashley
ITEM SUMMARY:
Consideration of whether the dates of future meetings are agreeable to the Board.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
n/a
SUBMITTED BY:
Lawren Weiss