Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda_GTAB_10.13.2017Notice of Meeting for the Georgetown Transportation Adv isory Board and the Gov erning Body of the City of Georgetown October 13, 2017 at 10:00 AM at GMC Building - 300-1 Industrial Av e, Georgetown, TX 78626 The City o f G eo rgeto wn is committed to comp lianc e with the Americans with Dis abilities Ac t (ADA). If yo u req uire as s is tanc e in participating at a p ublic meeting d ue to a disability, as d efined und er the ADA, reas onab le as s is tance, ad ap tatio ns , or acc o mmo d ations will b e provid ed up o n req uest. P leas e c o ntact the City Sec retary's Office, at leas t three (3) days prior to the sc hed uled meeting d ate, at (512) 930-3652 o r City Hall at 113 Eas t 8th Street fo r add itional info rmation; TTY us ers ro ute through Relay Texas at 711. Regular Session (This Regular S es s io n may, at any time, b e rec es s ed to convene an Exec utive S es s io n fo r any p urpose authorized b y the Op en Meetings Act, Texas Go vernment Co d e 551.) A Call to Ord er The Board may, at any time, rec es s the R egular S es s io n to convene in Exec utive S es s io n at the reques t of the Chair, a Board Memb er, the City Manager, As s is tant City Manager, G eneral Manager of Utilities, City Co uncil Member, o r legal c o uns el for any p urpos e authorized b y the Op en Meetings Act, Texas Government C o d e Chapter 551, and are s ubjec t to actio n in the Regular Ses s ion that follows . B Introduction of Vis itors C Ind ustry/C AMP O/TXDOT Updates - Ed P o las ek, AICP, Transportatio n Planning Coordinator D Oc tober 2017 GTAB Updates Wesley Wright, P.E., Sys tems Engineering Direc tor/Michael Hallmark, CIP Manager. E Dis cus s ion regard ing the Airp o rt Mo nthly Report and P ro ject Time Lines . – R us s Volk, C.M., Airport Manager and Oc tavio A. Garza, P.E, C.P.M., Pub lic Wo rks Direc tor Legislativ e Regular Agenda F Review and p o s s ib le ac tion to approve the minutes from the regular GTAB Board meeting held o n Sep tember 8, 2017. - Jana Kern – GTAB Board Liaison G Co nsideration and possible recommendatio n to ap p ro ve Task Order B&M 18-001 for the professional services related to the Solid Was te Trans fer Station Master P lan Study with Burns and Mc Donnell o f Austin, Texas in the amo unt not to exceed $197,860. Jo rd an Fengel, Environmental S ervic e Pro grams Co o rd inator; Oc tavio Garza, P.E., Director o f P ublic Works . H Co nsideration and possible recommendatio n o n Task Order KPA-18-001 to Kas berg, Patrick, and As s o ciates , LP of Geo rgeto wn, TX in the amo unt o f $533,072.00 for P avement Cond ition Ind ices and Five Year Street Maintenance Program - Wes ley Wright, P.E., Systems Engineering Directo r Adjournment Page 1 of 159 CERTIFICATE OF POSTING I, Shelley No wling, C ity S ecretary fo r the C ity of Geo rgeto wn, Texas , d o hereby c ertify that this Notice of Meeting was p o s ted at City Hall, 113 E. 8th Street, a p lace read ily acc es s ible to the general p ublic at all times , on the ______ d ay o f __________________, 2017, at __________, and remained so p o s ted fo r at leas t 72 c o ntinuo us ho urs p receding the sc heduled time o f s aid meeting. ____________________________________ S helley No wling, City Sec retary Page 2 of 159 City of Georgetown, Texas Transportation Advisory Board October 13, 2017 SUBJECT: Octo b er 2017 GTAB Up d ates Wes ley Wright, P.E., S ystems Engineering Direc to r/Mic hael Hallmark, CIP Manager. ITEM SUMMARY: Austin Avenue Bridges Project - N & S San Gabriel Rivers: Under T xDOT review. Flood Study: Study ongoing. P reliminary flood s tud y res ults are c o mp lete. Mitigation effo rts are c urrently being evaluated. Draft res ults exp ected late summer 2017. F inal rep o rt d ue end of 2017. FM 971 - Realignment at Austin Avenue: Preliminary Engineering complete; Engineer’s wo rk fo r the 60% design s ubmittal is o n hold p ending AFA with T xDOT. S ubmittal o f p reliminary signal des ign to T xDOT 11-17-16. AFA d o cuments finalized . Sc heduled engineering completio n early 2018 FM 1460: Construction is on-going; administered by TxDOT. Utility relo catio n co mp lete. I 35 SB FR Sidewalk Improvements Project (University Ave to Leander Rd): Cons tructio n Approximately 99% complete. Ac c es s ible s tructures s till require railing. Antic ip ate completio n Sep tember. Southwest Bypass (RM 2243 to IH 35) Phase 1 - P roject has been started by Jordan Foster. Work ongoing. Expected completion 2019. So uthwest Bypass (RM 2243 to IH 35) Phase 2 – County let preliminary construction project for phase 2 which includes the construction of ramps into and out of the Quarry, completion scheduled for July. Southwest Bypass (Leander Rd. to Wolf Ranch Parkway Extension) Wolf Ranch Parkway Extension (SW Bypass to DB Wood Rd.) Cons tructio n is ap p ro ximately 75% c o mp lete projec t wide. S o uth San Gab riel bridge beam s et is c o mp lete alo ng with dec k panels , concrete pours for dec k are s c heduled to begin 8-25. Sec o nd b rid ge s o uth o f the Gab riel, b eam s et c omplete. Bas e c o urse ins talled alo ng with first c o urse As phalt exc luding the area b etween the b rid ges . Transit Service (Fixed Route Bus): Service has begun. No further monthly updates . 2015 Road Bond Program, Citywide Sidewalk Improvements Project Cons tructio n s tarted May 1, 2017. All flat wo rk alo ng Williams drive is comp lete, with revegetation and Page 3 of 159 s ignal wo rk underway. 8th and Ro ck wo rk waiting o n railing to be complete. C rews working at 8th and churc h ap p roximately 3 weeks to complete fo llo wed b y Founders Park. Projec t ap p roximately 65 % c o mp lete. Williams Drive Study: Plan adopted b y Counc il. P ro jects will be co ns idered fo r funding as part o f 2019 b udgeting p ro cess. Transportation Services Operations CIP Maintenance KPA wo rking on C urb and gutter design, Cutler, limited in-ho use chip seals and point rep airs . Currently working with Steger and Bizzell on d es ign for d rainage study at 18th and Hutto , cons tructio n ad ministration fo r 20th and Ho gg, and d es ign fo r 2nd and Roc k Street d etentio n p o nd upgrad e. 2017 CDBG Scenic Drive Sidewalk 100% Complete. P ro ject is ad vertis ed and Pre-bid is s et for 10/2/2017. Sidewalk Eas ements are sec ure. Power Po le has b een relo cated . Fire hyd rant to b e reloc ated as c o nstruc tion b egins . Old Town “Northeast” Sidewalk Task Order approved 7-25-17. Surveying is in progres s . FINANCIAL IMPACT: N/A SUBMITTED BY: Wes ley Wright, P.E., S ystems Engineering Direc to r/Mic hael Hallmark, CIP Manager. ATTACHMENTS: Description Type October 2017 GTAB Updates Backup Material Page 4 of 159 Page 5 of 159 Page 6 of 159 Page 7 of 159 Page 8 of 159 Page 9 of 159 Page 10 of 159 Page 11 of 159 Page 12 of 159 Page 13 of 159 Page 14 of 159 Page 15 of 159 Page 16 of 159 City of Georgetown, Texas Transportation Advisory Board October 13, 2017 SUBJECT: Disc ussion regarding the Airport Monthly Rep o rt and Projec t Time Lines . – Rus s Vo lk, C.M., Airp o rt Manager and O c tavio A. Garza, P.E, C.P.M., P ublic Works Directo r ITEM SUMMARY: Airport Reports: · Cons tructio n Projec t Report · Airp o rt Mas ter Plan Rep o rt · Op erations Rep o rt · Fuel S ales Rep o rt · Hangar / Tie-Do wn Leas e Report · 2017 Ac complishments and Projec ts · Avgas F uel Pric e Co mp aris on · Jet A F uel Pric e Co mp aris on · Airport Monthly Financ ial Report FINANCIAL IMPACT: N/A SUBMITTED BY: Rus s Vo lk, C.M., Airport Manager ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Cons truction Project Update Backup Material Mas ter Plan Report Backup Material Operations Report Backup Material Fuel Sales Report Backup Material Hangar/Tie-down Report Backup Material 2017 Goals and Accomplis hments Backup Material Avgas Price Comparis on Backup Material Jet A Price Comparis on Backup Material Airport Monthly Financial Report Backup Material Airport Detailed Financial Report Backup Material Page 17 of 159 Airport Improvements Project No. 1514GRGTN Oct 2017 Project Description FY2015 project: Construction of Fuel Storage Tanks, Parallel Taxiway A, Pavement Maintenance Purpose Improved safety and reliability of airport Project Manager Russ Volk C.M., Airport Manager Project Engineer Garver Notes: Oct 2014 - Council Resolution 101414-F – Approval to Debt Fund $870K for project Mar 2015 - Council Resolution 032415-G – Authorization for City to Sell Certificates of Obligation to fund project Jan 28, 2016 – Transportation Commission approval of $8.3M Grant Jan 29, 2016 – City cost share of $830K wire transferred to TxDOT Aviation per payment instructions from TxDOT Jun 10, 2016 – Following completion of bidding process being conducted under grant 1314GRGTN, TxDOT will provide Airport Project Participation Agreement for City consideration Jun 28, 2016 – City Council consideration of Airport Project Participation Agreement Jun 22, 2016 – Pre-Construction Meeting Page 18 of 159 Jul 7, 2016 – Planned start date for construction Jul 14, 2016 – Start date for construction Nov 11, 2016 – Placement of compactible rock/gravel for new asphalt surface, placement of storm drain pipe, underground utility work at airport terminal Dec 8, 2016 – Placement of compactible rock/gravel for new asphalt surface, concrete foundations for new fuel tanks, tree clearing in runway clear zone followed by fence installation Jan 13, 2017 – Placement of compactible rock/gravel for new asphalt surface, placement of new fuel tanks, fence installation in runway clear zone Feb 10, 2017 – Placement of FAA spec base material for new asphalt surface, plumbing of new fuel tanks and self-serve dispensers, fence installation in runway clear zone Mar 10, 2017 – Placement of FAA spec base material for new asphalt surface, testing and certification of new fuel storage facility, soak testing of new fuel tanks. Apr 14, 2017 – Placement of FAA spec base material for new asphalt surface, now using new fuel tanks, preparing to remove old fuel system. May 12, 2017 – Placement of Phase 1 of asphalt for new taxiway. Beginning crack seal and seal coat effort on existing taxiways. Installation of new storm drain pipe. Jun 9, 2017 – Working punch list from Phase 1 asphalt pavement. Crack seal and seal coat effort on existing taxiways. Installation of new storm drain pipe. Old Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) removed from Airport. Jul 14, 2017 – Opened Phase 1 asphalt pavement for airplane use. Crack seal and seal coat effort on existing taxiways. Installation of new storm drain pipe. Cleaning paved shoulders of Runway 18/36. Beginning construction of connecting Taxiway D. Aug 11, 2017 – Crack seal and seal coat effort on existing taxiways. Installation of new storm drain pipe. Cleaning paved shoulders of Runway 11/29. Taxiway D open for use. Construction on north end of new Taxiway A. Sep 8, 2017 – Installation of new storm drain pipe. Construction on north end of new Taxiway A. Rehabilitation of terminal concrete apron. Oct 13, 2017 – Installation of new storm drain pipe. Asphalt paving on north end of new Taxiway A. Rehabilitation of terminal concrete apron. Page 19 of 159 Airport Improvements Project No. 16MPGRGTN Oct 2017 Project Description FY2016 project: Airport Master Plan Update Purpose Update to 2005 Airport Master Plan Project Manager Russ Volk C.M., Airport Manager Project Estimate $213,290 Project Engineer Coffman Associates Jan 28 – Transportation Commission approval of $200K Grant Feb 19 – Solicitation for Consultant Qualifications Mar 29 – Consultant Qualification Submissions due TxDOT Aviation Apr – Committee to Review Consultant Qualifications • John Pettitt • Donna Courtney • Mike Babin • Jordon Maddox • Russ Volk May 9 – Selection Committee scheduled to meet to tabulate scoring of consultants Jun/Jul 2016 – TxDOT in negotiations with consultant over scope of work and fees Page 20 of 159 Sep/Oct/Nov – Selection of Members for Master Plan Steering Committee Dec 6, 2016 – Kickoff Meeting with Steering Committee and Consultant Feb 2, 2017 – 2nd Meeting with Planning Advisory Committee and Consultant as well as Public Open House Mar, 2017 – Documents available for public comments Apr, 2017 – Documents available for public comments May, 2017 – Documents available for public comments Jun 6, 2017 – 3rd Meeting with Planning Advisory Committee and Consultant from 2 – 4 PM followed by a Public Open House from 5:30 to 7 PM. Jul, 2017 – Documents available for public comments Aug, 2017 – Documents available for public comments Sep, 2017 – Documents available for public comments Oct, 2017 – Documents available for public comments Nov 16, 2017 – Planning Advisory Committee mtg from 2 – 4 PM @ Library Public Information Workshop from 5:30 to 7 PM @ GCAT Page 21 of 159 Georgetown Municipal Airport Contract Tower Program Update Operations for Month of Aug 2017 Project Description Georgetown Tower Monthly Update Purpose Operations Report Project Manager Russ Volk C.M., Airport Manager Operating Statistics Performance/volumetric indicators For the Month of: Aug Aug 2016 FY-T-D Aug 2017 FY-T-D Variance Take Offs and Landings 2016 2017 IFR 690 680 7,645 8,031 386 5% VFR 7,395 8,157 77,154 86,485 9,331 11% Total Take Offs/Landings 8,085 8,837 84,799 94,516 9,717 10% *This does not include flyover operations (i.e. handoffs from ABIA approach/departure control to KGTU tower then onto the next ATC. Page 22 of 159 Georgetown Municipal Airport Fuel Sales Update For Month of Aug 2017 Project Description Georgetown Fuel Sales Update Purpose Fuel Sales Monthly Report Project Manager Russ Volk C.M., Airport Manager Operating Statistics Performance/volumetric indicators Gallons For the Month of: Aug Aug 2016 FY-T-D Aug 2017 FY-T-D Variance Type of Fuel 2016 2017 AVGAS 22,100 26,545 270,974 286,180 15,206 5% JET A 39,933 43,147 436,982 509,620 72,638 14% Total Gallons Sold 62,033 69,692 707,956 795,800 87,844 11% Page 23 of 159 Airport Hangar / Tie-Down Lease Update Oct 2017 Project Description Hangar / Tie-Down Lease Agreements Purpose Occupancy Rates Project Manager Russ Volk C.M., Airport Manager Unit Stats Total Hangars – 135 • 100 Percent Occupied Total Storage Units – 11 • 4 Occupied • 7 Vacant Total Tie-Downs – 38 Monthly, 11 for Overnight/Transient Parking • 100 Percent Occupied Page 24 of 159 GTU Airport In-Work Projects Replace bottom door seals on Hangars H, I, and J. 45 of 63 complete Develop Airport Preventative Maintenance Program. Repairs to terminal ramp to reduce FOD issues. Planned Projects Obtaining Pesticide Application License to allow for airport staff to spray state regulated chemicals. Develop Hangar Routine Maintenance Program. Evaluate possible software solutions for a technology based Pavement Management Program. Evaluate possible software solutions for a technology based Airport Self Inspection Program. Upgrade to bi-fold doors drive motors on Hangars BB and CC. Developing lease agreement for storage locations. Page 25 of 159 Accomplishments 2017 Roof repairs to Central Texas Avionics roof Installation of electronic gate at Genesis Hangar Updated Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Replaced tower controller parking signs Windsock annual maintenance Electronic gate quarterly maintenance Runway 18 PAPI quarterly maintenance FBO fuel truck quarterly inspections Replaced 12 obstruction lights on lights poles along Lakeway Drive Replaced 2 HVAC below window units in Control Tower Replaced 9 street lights Replaced Tower Obstruction Lights Replaced Tower carpet Completed a TxDOT Aviation Safety and Compliance Inspection of Airport Underground Storage Tank removed at old Gantt Hangars New Airport Fuel Storage System placed in operation New Business Operations Software placed in service Removed 11 abandoned telephone poles Crack sealed and seal coated Taxiway J Crack sealed and seal coated Taxiway K Crack sealed and seal coated Taxiway M Page 26 of 159 Crack sealed and seal coated access route to Genesis Hangar Seal coated shoulders of Runway 11/29 Installed new electronic gate at entrance to Terminal Apron from Terminal Parking Lot Executed new leases for Tower T-Hangar tenants Rekeyed Tower T-Hangar door to the City key system Added full time Airport Maintenance person Electrical upgrade to Hangar J Electrical upgrade to Hangar I Crack sealed and seal coated Taxiway E Old AvGas Underground Tank removed from Airport Old Jet A Underground Tank removed from Airport Construction of new Taxiway F Construction of new Taxiway E Construction of new Taxiway C Widening of Taxiway J Installation of edge reflectors along all Taxiways Implemented new Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasures Plan Painted Airport Business Coordinators Office and Terminal Restrooms Installed new Taxiway Navigation signs Removed old chain link fence from north side of Terminal Drive Installed fuel hose retract speed controller on self-serve pump #1 Crack sealed and seal coated East Apron Painted new Compass Rose on East Apron Page 27 of 159 Cleaned windows in Control Tower and Airport Terminal Crack sealed and seal coated Taxiway L Crack sealed and seal coated Taxiway G Crack sealed and seal coated Taxiway A1 Crack sealed and seal coated Terminal Asphalt Apron Installed Stop or Yield signs at the internal airport city street intersections Updated Airport Maintenance Coordinator job description Apron asphalt repair for hangar at 221 Stearman Drive Installed fuel hose retract speed controller on self-serve pump #2 Updated Airport Ordinance Updated Airport Minimum Standards Page 28 of 159 10/4/2017 AirNav: Fuel prices near Georgetown, TX 78628 http://airnav.com/fuel/local.html 1/3 1074 users online 100LL Avgas prices within 50 miles of Georgetown, TX 78628 Airport / FBO 100LL $3.40—$6.70 average $4.57 KGTU 2 ENE Georgetown Municipal Airport Georgetown, TX, USA FS $4.99 $4.89 GUARANTEED City of Georgetown Terminal SS $3.75 18-Sep update AeroJet Center FS $4.99 GUARANTEED T74 15 ESE Taylor Municipal Airport Taylor, TX, USA Taylor Municipal Airport Avfuel SS $3.70 02-Oct update KEDC 18 SSE Austin Executive Airport Austin, TX, USA SS $4.50 FS $5.70 03-Oct update 3R9 24 SW Lakeway Airpark Lakeway, TX, USA Lakeway Airpark SS $3.99 04-Oct update 88R 24 WSW Spicewood Airport Spicewood, TX, USA Spicewood Pilots Association, Inc SS $3.70 29-Sep update Airports Navaids Airspace Fixes Aviation Fuel iPhone App My AirNav Page 29 of 159 10/4/2017 AirNav: Fuel prices near Georgetown, TX 78628 http://airnav.com/fuel/local.html 2/3 KILE 25 N Skylark Field Airport Killeen, TX, USA Flight Line Services Avfuel SS $3.55 18-Sep update KBMQ 28 W Burnet Municipal Airport-Kate Craddock Field Burnet, TX, USA Faulkner's Air Shop Avfuel FS $4.28 26-Sep update KAUS 28 S Austin-Bergstrom International Airport Austin, TX, USA FS $6.70 GUARANTEED FS $6.45 03-Oct update KTPL 33 NNE Draughon-Miller Central Texas Regional Airport Temple, TX, USA General Aviation Terminal SS $4.15 FS $4.53 GUARANTEED KDZB 35 WSW Horseshoe Bay Resort Airport Horseshoe Bay, TX, USA Horseshoe Bay Resort Jet Center FS $6.24 26-Sep update KLZZ 37 NW Lampasas Airport Lampasas, TX, USA City of Lampasas (FBO) SS $3.40 GUARANTEED KRCK 37 E H H Coffield Regional Airport Rockdale, TX, USA City of Rockdale AS $4.22 29-Sep update T35 40 ENE Cameron Municipal Airpark Cameron, TX, USA City of Cameron SS $3.69 GUARANTEED KHYI 47 S San Marcos Regional Airport Austin, TX, USA SS $4.18 FS $5.28 29-Sep update FS $5.39 $5.29 GUARANTEED Page 30 of 159 10/4/2017 AirNav: Fuel prices near Georgetown, TX 78628 http://airnav.com/fuel/local.html 3/3 84R 47 SE Smithville Crawford Municipal Airport Smithville, TX, USA Fayette Aero LLC Avfuel SS $4.40 19-Sep update KGYB 48 SE Giddings-Lee County Airport Giddings, TX, USA Sills Aviation Services LLC independent SS $4.15 26-Sep update 50R 49 S Lockhart Municipal Airport Lockhart, TX, USA Martin & Martin Aviation Avfuel SS $4.50 11-Sep update KAQO 50 W Llano Municipal Airport Llano, TX, USA City of Llano Avfuel SS $3.70 03-Oct update Copyright © AirNav, LLC. All rights reserved.Privacy Policy Contact Page 31 of 159 10/4/2017 AirNav: Fuel prices near Georgetown, TX 78628 http://airnav.com/fuel/local.html 1/2 1080 users online Jet A prices within 50 miles of Georgetown, TX 78628 Airport / FBO Jet A $2.68—$7.03 average $4.35 KGTU 2 ENE Georgetown Municipal Airport Georgetown, TX, USA FS $4.33 $4.23 GUARANTEED AeroJet Center FS $4.48 GUARANTEED T74 15 ESE Taylor Municipal Airport Taylor, TX, USA Taylor Municipal Airport Avfuel SS $2.85 02-Oct update KEDC 18 SSE Austin Executive Airport Austin, TX, USA FS $5.80 03-Oct update KILE 25 N Skylark Field Airport Killeen, TX, USA Flight Line Services Avfuel SS $3.30 FS $3.55 18-Sep update KBMQ 28 W Burnet Municipal Airport-Kate Craddock Field Burnet, TX, USA Faulkner's Air Shop Avfuel FS $3.72 21-Sep update KAUS 28 S Austin-Bergstrom International Airport Austin, TX, USA FS $7.033 GUARANTEED FS $6.65 03-Oct Airports Navaids Airspace Fixes Aviation Fuel iPhone App My AirNav Page 32 of 159 10/4/2017 AirNav: Fuel prices near Georgetown, TX 78628 http://airnav.com/fuel/local.html 2/2 update KTPL 33 NNE Draughon-Miller Central Texas Regional Airport Temple, TX, USA General Aviation Terminal SS $4.15 FS $4.53 GUARANTEED KDZB 35 WSW Horseshoe Bay Resort Airport Horseshoe Bay, TX, USA Horseshoe Bay Resort Jet Center FS $5.49 26-Sep update T35 40 ENE Cameron Municipal Airpark Cameron, TX, USA City of Cameron SS $2.68 GUARANTEED KHYI 47 S San Marcos Regional Airport Austin, TX, USA FS $4.31 29-Sep update FS $4.42 $4.32 GUARANTEED KGYB 48 SE Giddings-Lee County Airport Giddings, TX, USA Sills Aviation Services LLC independent SS $3.50 26-Sep update KAQO 50 W Llano Municipal Airport Llano, TX, USA City of Llano Avfuel FS $3.20 19-Sep update Copyright © AirNav, LLC. All rights reserved.Privacy Policy Contact Page 33 of 159 APPROVED BUDGET CURRENT PERIOD YEAR TO DATE (W/ENCUMB) YEAR-END PROJECTION YTD YEAR-END VARIANCE FAV(UNFAV) % YEAR-END VARIANCE FAV(UNFAV) BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 43,849 311,251 311,251 - 0.00% Revenues Operating Revenue Fuel and Terminal Sales 2,720,928 219,839 2,453,062 2,561,492 (108,430) -4.23% Leases and Rentals 767,990 72,015 832,277 872,054 (39,777) -4.56% Interest and Other 66,075 2,338 41,953 50,554 (8,601) -17.01% TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE 3,554,993 294,192 3,327,292 3,484,100 (156,808) -4.50% Expenditures Operating Expenditures Personnel 388,781 28,315 319,770 358,048 38,278 10.69% Operations-Fuel 2,296,928 165,360 2,184,472 2,200,414 15,942 0.72% Operations-Non Fuel 657,086 41,800 674,876 666,386 (8,490) -1.27% Transfers Out 25,000 - 25,000 25,000 - 0.00% Airport Master Plan - - - - - 0.00% Debt Service 143,768 - 141,265 143,768 2,503 1.74% TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES 3,511,563 235,475 3,345,383 3,393,616 48,233 1.42% TOTAL NET OPERATIONS 43,430 58,717 (18,091) 90,484 (108,575) -119.99% Revenues Non-Operating Revenue Grants 35,000 - 50,000 50,000 - 0.00% TOTAL NON-OPERATING REVENUES 35,000 - 50,000 50,000 - 0.00% TOTAL NET NON-OPERATIONS 35,000 - 50,000 50,000 - 0.00% EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF TOTAL REVENUE OVER TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 78,430 58,717 31,909 140,484 (108,575) -138.44% ENDING FUND BALANCE 122,279 343,160 451,735 (108,575) -24.04% Preliminary Actual to Year-End Projection September 2017 Airport Operations Fund Page 34 of 159 Page 35 of 159 Page 36 of 159 Page 37 of 159 Page 38 of 159 City of Georgetown, Texas Transportation Advisory Board October 13, 2017 SUBJECT: Review and pos s ible actio n to ap p ro ve the minutes fro m the regular GTAB Bo ard meeting held on Septemb er 8, 2017. - Jana Kern – GTAB Bo ard Liais o n ITEM SUMMARY: Bo ard to review and revis e and /or ap p ro ve the minutes fro m the regular meeting held o n Septemb er 8, 2017. FINANCIAL IMPACT: N/A SUBMITTED BY: Cind y Alejand ro ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Draft Minutes Backup Material Page 39 of 159 Minutes of the Meeting of the Georgetown Transportation Advisory Board and the Governing Body of the City of Georgetown, Texas September 8, 2017 The City of Georgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If you require assistance in participation at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the ADA, reasonable assistance, adaptations, or accommodations will be provided upon request. Please contact the City at least four (4) days prior to the schedul ed meeting date, at (512)930-3652 or City Hall at 113 East 8th Street for additional information: TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. Board Members: Steve Johnston – Chair, Ron Bindas – Vice Chair, Donna Courtney – Secretary, John Marler, Sheila Mills, Mark Allen, Troy Hellmann and John Hesser Board Members Absent: Doug Noble Staff Present: Octavio Garza, Jim Briggs, Mike Babin, Mark Miller, Cindy Alejandro, Wesley Wright, Ed Polasek, Russ Volk Others Present: Carl Norris, Dennis Hegeberth, Terry Reed, Richard Balentine and John Milford – ACC, Tom Crawford, Ken Mabe, Larry Wood, Regular Session A Call to Order: Mr. Johnston called the regular GTAB Board Meeting to order on Friday, September 8, 2017 at 10:00 AM The Board may, at any time, recess the Regular Session to convene in Executive Session at the request of the Chair, a Board Member, the City Manager, Assistant City Manager, General Manager of Utilities, City Council Member, or legal counsel for any purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code Chapter 551, and are subject to action in the Regular Session that follows. B Introduction of Visitors C Industry/CAMPO/TXDOT Updates - Ed Polasek, Transportation Planning Coordinator Travis Baird and Ed Polasek recently met with TxDOT’s Mobility 35 staff to discuss the development of their projects. One important outcome, based on our previous request, TxDOT is completing the environmental clearance for the Northbound Frontage Road from Williams Drive to Lakeway as part of the Williams Drive Interchange project. The Northbound Frontage Project is currently in the 2015 Bond Program as a FY 2023 Construction project. This really helps us in the preliminary design and approval process. D September 2017 GTAB Updates - Wesley Wright, P.E., Systems Engineering Director / Michael Hallmark, CIP Manager E Discussion regarding the Airport Monthly Report and Project Time Lines. – Russ Volk, C.M., Airport Manager and Octavio A. Garza, P.E, C.P.M., Public Works Director. Mr. Norris spoke on this item, comments are at the end of these minutes. Page 40 of 159 Legislative Regular Agenda The Board will individually consider and possibly take action on any or all of the following items: F Review and possible action to approve the minutes from the regular GTAB Board meeting held on August 11, 2017. - Cindy Alejandro – GTAB Board Liaison Motion by Marler second Bindas by to approve the minutes as presented. Approved 8-0-1 (Noble absent) G Consideration and possible recommendation to approve the First Amendment to the Facility Lease Agreement with Wood Aviation, Inc. – Russ Volk, C.M., Airport Manager and Octavio A. Garza, P.E., C.P.M, Public Works Director Motion by Hellmann second Marler by to approve the First Amendment to the Facility Lease Agreement with Wood Aviation, Inc. Approved 8-0-1 (Noble absent) H Consideration and possible recommendation to approve a purchase of Iteris Battery Backup and Video Processors from John Drake, of Santa Ana, Ca. in the amount of $133,345.00. – Octavio Garza, P.E., Public Works Director Motion by Marler second Hesser by to approve a purchase of Iteris Battery Backup and Video Processors from John Drake, of Santa Ana, Ca. in the amount of $133,345.00. Approved 8-0-1 (Noble absent) Adjournment Motion by Marler second by Hesser to adjourn meeting. Approved 8-0-1 (Noble absent). Meeting adjourned at 10:39 AM Approved: Attested: _______________________ __________________________ Steve Johnston – Chair Donna Courtney – Secretary _________________________________ Jana Kern – GTAB Board Liaison Page 41 of 159 GTAB STATEMENT SEPTEMBER 8, 2017 AGENDA ITEM “E” AIRPORT MONTHLY REPORT AND PROJECT TIME LINES Good morning Mr. Chairman, members of the Georgetown Transportation Advisory Board, city staff and ladies and gentlemen. My name is Hugh C. Norris, Jr. I am a member of the Airport Concerned Citizens (ACC). This is the 72nd presentation by ACC members to the city council and/or the GTAB demanding compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) regarding federal funding and fiscal transparency for the Georgetown Municipal Airport (GTU). My comments this morning address Item “E” regarding the missing staff response to the ACC GTAB May 12, 2017 Statement. That statement described some critical grant approval defects in two proposed state and/or federal funded projects currently included in the city's FY 2018 budget for Airport CIP: Design and Construction Rehab for Runway 18-36 scheduled for funding in FY 2018 and 2019 and Taxiway Edge Lighting scheduled for FY 2018. The board required staff to respond to this one and half page public statement made in the board limited six minutes. Staff could easily analyze any defective points or issues in that statement in one day and prepare a concise professional rebuttal of no more than two to four pages. It has now been four months since staff received the board's request and no response has been presented for public review and comment. Sadly, this type stonewalling and silent contempt by the city and staff to public NEPA compliance demands regarding defective GTU state and/or federal grants is nothing new to our community. It is our understanding that in lieu of a professional concise staff response a bound 50 page document was secretly released to this board and city officials. We understand it consisted of transcript excerpts from the Texas Transportation Commission (TTC) January 28, 2016 meeting, city council minutes, federal level correspondence, airport fact sheet, and an engineer's certification letter regarding the 1514GRGTN 25 project grant. We understand the secret report totally omitted professional rebuttal of issues or points regarding the illicit Runway 18-36 and Taxiway Edge Lighting projects. ACC members presented public objection testimonies at the described TTC meeting for the commission's Minute Order (MO) consideration that included two GTU grants, the 25 project 1514GRGTN and the new GTU master plan update. The TTC arranged order of speakers to ensure that city and state officials spoke last thereby preventing by TTC rules any public rebuttals to false statements by these officials prior to the TTC's MO vote. The 1514GRGTN grant is a TxDOT segmented and modified sub -program of the total construction multi-project, multimillion program identified by the Page 42 of 159 2005 GRW-Willis GTU master plan to accommodate for the planning period new expanded numbers of based aircraft and take off and landing operations. Three prior master plan and updates have been completed for the GTU. Each plan separately identified multi-project, multimillion dollar programs for cumulative accommodations for new expansions of based aircraft from 48 to 405 and annual operations from 31,550 to 202,025. None of the master plans and their program projects were for safety and reliability for initial based aircraft and operations. There has never been any opportunities for public review and commentary for 1514GRGTN. An Environmental Assessment (EA) was prepared for the Fuel Farm, a single segmented project out of the 1514GRGTN sub-program, but all of the over 100 public verbal and written objections to the entire sub-program were ruled by TxDOT to be outside the limited scope for Fuel Farm FONSI purposes and ruled irrelevant. It is understood this secret response included state official statements repeating the lie against me addressed in my GTAB June 09, 2017 statement and correspondence sent to me from federal elected and administrative levels without inclusion of my written rebuttals stating them riddled with false, misleading or no information and/or positions inconsistent with the NEPA. An included engineering report addressed only project elements of 1514GRGTN and not the Runway 18-36 Rehab for doubling the strength of the runway. All the city responses on the airport fact sheet contain false or misleading information. The city response to the EIS question is without merit and inconsistent with FAA NEPA compliance Orders 5050.4B and 1050.1F. For appropriate community involvement, this staff response report should be presented to this board and the public in an open free dialog workshop attended by local, state and federal officials and the press, TV broadcast by the city's streaming video productions, and made into a YouTube video for global review. Mr. Chairman, I welcome comments and/or questions from the board. Page 43 of 159 City of Georgetown, Texas Transportation Advisory Board October 13, 2017 SUBJECT: Cons id eration and p o s s ib le rec o mmendation to approve Tas k Ord er B&M 18-001 fo r the p ro fes s io nal s ervic es related to the S o lid Waste Transfer S tatio n Mas ter Plan S tud y with Burns and McDo nnell of Aus tin, Texas in the amount no t to exc eed $197,860. Jordan F engel, Enviro nmental Service Programs Coordinator; O c tavio Garza, P.E., Direc tor of Pub lic Wo rks. ITEM SUMMARY: Develo p ing a S o lid Was te Master Plan (SWMP) fo r the City o f Georgetown (C ity) represents a c ritic al step to d etermine how the City will manage its munic ipal s o lid was te s tream o ver the next 20 years . Planning and imp lementing an integrated solid waste management program is a c o mp lex and c hallenging endeavo r enc o mp as s ing a ho s t o f issues : technological, ins titutional, legal, soc ial, eco nomic and environmental. Furthermo re, as c ities througho ut the US purs ue s olutions to their s o lid was te management challenges , it is inc reas ingly apparent that no s ingle method, tec hno lo gy, or p ro gram o ffers a c o mp lete s o lutio n; rather, a combination o f methods is need ed to provide fo r appropriate and c o s t-effec tive management of s p ecific typ es of waste in ac c o rd anc e with the uniq ue properties of thes e vario us was te s tream components . Rec o gnizing this , as well as the benefits o f a more integrated approac h, Burns & Mc Donnell is proposing to as s is t the City in d eveloping a S WMP that p ro vides the vis io n and framewo rk to guid e future ac tivities and to d evelo p the infrastruc ture, p ro grams and polic ies need ed to manage the City’s s o lid was te fo r the next 20 years . Exp erienc e shows that effec tive solid waste management plans : ? Reflect the planning region’s values and guiding p rinc ip les for waste management and divers io n ? Es tablish loc al was te management p lanning goals ? Includ e analys is and c o nsideratio n o f reaso nable alternatives The fo llo wing is s ues will be as s es s ed while develo p ing this SWMP: ? Evaluate trans fer s tatio n facility o p erations and facility imp ro vements ? Develop p rojec tions for future trans fer statio n facility needs and o p tions ? Evaluate exis ting s o lid was te and recycling programs , recognizing that the City contrac ts fo r services ? Identify preferred s trategies to increase d ivers io n rates The p urpose of the transfer s tatio n evaluation s tud y is to develo p a comparis o n o f the financial and non- financial factors the C ity sho uld cons id er when making the dec is io n whether to make imp ro vements to its existing transfer s tation fac ility or to b uild a new trans fer s tatio n facility adjac ent to the existing one. The Projec t Team will evaluate two p rimary trans fer s tatio n o p tions : ? Optio n 1 - Mo d ificatio ns to Exis ting Trans fer Station ? Optio n 2 - New Trans fer Station Facility STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff rec o mmend s to approve Tas k Ord er B&M 18-001 fo r the p ro fes s io nal s ervices related to the So lid Was te Mas ter P lan and Trans fer S tatio n Stud y with Burns and Mc Donnell of Aus tin, Texas in the amount Page 44 of 159 not to exceed $197,860. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Funds fo r this exp enditure are availab le in the Enviro nmental Service FY17/18 Bud get. Fund: 100-5-0533-51-349 Actual: $197,860.00 SUBMITTED BY: Jordan Fengel ATTACHMENTS: Description Type T.O. B&M 18-001 Backup Material Page 45 of 159 TASK ORDER Task Order Task Order No. B&M-18-001-TO. consisting of pages. In accordance with paragraph 1.01 of the Master Services Agreement between Owner and Burns and McDonnell Engineering Co ("Engineer") for Professional Services - Task Order Edition, dated March 23, 2016("Agreement"), Owner and Engineer agree as follows: 1. Specific Project Data A. Title: Solid Waste Transfer Station Evaluation and Planning Study B. Description: The Solid Waste Transfer Station Evaluation and Planning Study will include the development of two related projects. The purpose of this transfer station evaluation study is to develop a comparison of the financial and non-financial factors the City should consider when maiding the decision whether to make improvements to its existing transfer station facility or to build a new transfer station facility adjacent to the existing one. The purpose of the planning study is to develop a 20-year solid waste master plan that will evaluate and provide recommendations on key solid waste, waste minimization and recycling issues for the City. C. City of Georgetown Project Number: D. City of Georgetown General Ledger Account No.: E. City of Georgetown Purchase Order No.: F. Master Services Agreement, Contract Number: 2017-0024-MSA 2. Services of Engineer Engineer will provide the services described in Exhibit A. 3. Owner's Responsibilities Owner shall have those responsibilities set forth in the Agreement subject to the following: As described in Exhibit A, Owner shall provide requested data from the Engineer, participate and assist in planning for meetings and review deliverables. 4. Times for Rendering Services Phase Completion Date Transfer Station Evaluation Study April 8, 2018 Solid Waste Master Plan August 31.2018 Refer to the Project Schedules in Exhibit A for the detailed project schedules. Georgetown - Revised 3.11 EJCDC E-505 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Engineer Professional Services—Task Order Edition Copyright ©2004 National Society of Professional Engineers for EJCDC. All rights reserved. Attachment 1 - Task Order Form Page 1 of 4 Page 46 of 159 TASK ORDER 5. Payments to Engineer A. Owner shall pay Engineer for services rendered as follows: Category of Services Compensation Method Lump Sum or Not to Exceed Amount of Compensation for Services Transfer Station Evaluation Study Lump Sum based on fee schedule provided in Exhibit A $38,360.00 Solid Waste Master Plan Lump Sum based on fee schedule provided in Exhibit A $159,500.00 B. The terms of payment are set forth in Article 4 of the Agreement unless modified in this Task Order. 6. Consultants: 7. Other Modifications to Agreement: MSA Section 6.01 A is revised to read: The standard of care for all professional engineering and related services performed or furnished by Engineer under this Agreement will conform to standard engineering practices and applicable rules and regulations of the Texas Engineering Practices Act and the rules of the Texas Board of Professional Engineers. Engineer warrants that the professional engineering and related services performed or furnished by Engineer under this Agreement, and Task Order issued under this Agreement, if any, shall meet such standard of care. MSA Section 6.OIL is revised to read: The Services to be performed under this Agreement shall be performed entirely at Engineer's risk. Engineer shall be responsible for initiating, maintaining, and supervising safety precautions and programs in connection with the Services to be performed under this Agreement. Engineer shall take all reasonable precautions for the safety of and shall provide all reasonable protection to prevent damage, injury, or loss to employees, the Services, endangered species, or the property affected by this Agreement. All damage or loss to any property caused in whole or in part by Engineer, Consultant, or anyone employed by either of them shall be remedied by Engineer. Georgetown - Revised 3.11 EJCDC E-505 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Engineer Professional Services—Task Order Edition Copyright ©2004 National Society of Professional Engineers for EJCDC. All rights reserved. Attachment 1 - Task Order Form Page 2 of 4 Page 47 of 159 TASK ORDER 8. Attachments: Exhibit A includes the Scope of Services, Fee Schedule and Project Schedules. 9. Documents Incorporated By Reference: The Agreement effective March 23, 2016. Georgetown - Revised 3.11 EJCDC E-505 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Engineer Professional Services—"t ask Order Edition Copyright ©2004 National Society of Professional Engineers for EJCDC. All rights reserved. Attachment 1 - Task Order Form Page 3 of 4 Page 48 of 159 TASK ORDER Terms and Conditions: Execution of this Task Order by Owner and Engineer shall make it subject to the terms and conditions of the Agreement (as modified above), which Agreement is incorporated by this reference. Engineer is authorized to begin performance upon its receipt of a copy of this Task Order signed by Owner. The Effective Date of this Task Order is 20 OWNER: ENGINEER: By: By: Name: Dale Ross Name: Mark Knaack Title: Mayor, City of Georgetown Title: Principal Date: Engineer License or Firm's Certificate No. State of: Date: October 6,2017 F-845 Texas APPROVED AS TO FORM ONLY BY Cm ATTORNEY AND BY CITY COUNCIL MARCH 8,2011, AGENDA ITEM "P" APPROVED AS TO FORM VERIFIED: Nicole Abrego Buyer Georgetown - Revised 3.11 EJCDC E-505 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Engineer Professional Services—Task Order Edition Copyright ©2004 National Society of Professional Engineers for EJCDC. All rights reserved. Attachment 1 - Task Order Form Page 4 of 4 Page 49 of 159 TASK DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE FOR TASK ORDER: ORDER DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE FOR TASK ORDER: Name: Wesley Wright, PE Title: Systems Engineering Director Address: 300-1 Industrial Ave. Georgetown, TX 78626 E-Mail Address: Wesley.Wright@georgetown.org Phone: 512-930-7672 Fax: 512-930-3559 Name: Scott Pasternak Title: Associate 8911 Capital of Texas Address: Suite 3100 Austin, TX 78759 E-Mail spasternak@bumsmcd.com Address: Phone: 512-872-7141 Fax: 512-872-7127 Georgetown - Revised 3.11 EJCDC E-505 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Engineer Professional Services—Task Order Edition Copyright ©2004 National Society of Professional Engineers for EJCDC. All rights reserved. Attachment 1 - Task Order Form Page 5 of 4 Page 50 of 159 1 SOLID WASTE TRANSFER STATION EVALUATION AND PLANNING STUDY This proposal includes the Scope of Services, Budget, and Schedule for a comprehensive study for the City of Georgetown (City) that evaluates the existing transfer station, and its role in solid waste management for the City, as well as a long-term plan to guide future activities and to develop the infrastructure, programs and policies needed to manage the City’s solid waste for the next 20 years. This proposal presents two Scopes of Services that will be completed in parallel. The Scopes of Service are dependent on one another and completion of the work will require coordination by Burns & McDonnell and City staff. Transfer Station Evaluation The purpose of this transfer station evaluation study (Study) is to develop a comparison of the financial and non-financial factors the City should consider when making the decision whether to make improvements to its existing transfer station facility or to build a new transfer station facility adjacent to the existing one. The evaluation includes development of planning-level, conceptual designs for both options. The transfer stations role in solid waste management is critical for the City and the requirements developed for the Evaluation will be informed through the Solid Waste Management Plan. Solid Waste Management Plan (SWMP) Developing a Solid Waste Master Plan for City represents a critical step to determine how the City will manage its municipal solid waste stream over the next 20 years, including how the City utilizes its current transfer station, or one or more future transfer stations. Planning and implementing an integrated solid waste management program is a complex and challenging endeavor encompassing a host of issues: technological/engineering, institutional, legal, social, economic and environmental. Furthermore, as cities throughout the US pursue solutions to their solid waste management challenges, it is increasingly apparent that no single method, technology, or program offers a complete solution; rather, a combination of methods is needed to provide for appropriate and cost-effective management of specific types of waste in accordance with the unique properties of these various waste stream components. SCOPE OF SERVICES - TRANSFER STATION EVALUATION STUDY The purpose of this transfer station evaluation study (Study) is to develop a comparison of the financial and non-financial factors the City should consider when making the decision whether to make improvements to its existing transfer station facility or to build a new transfer station facility adjacent to Page 51 of 159 2 the existing one. This proposal provides a scope of services, budget estimate and project schedule for the Burns & McDonnell Project Team to complete the Study. Task 1 – Project Initiation and Management Task 1A – Project Management Burns & McDonnell will provide overall management and administration for this project. The client will be invoiced periodically (monthly) and a project update will be included with each invoice. This task will be used to account for Burns & McDonnell’ direct project management costs. Task 1B – Initial Request for Information The Project Team will provide the City with an initial data request to gather and review the necessary information. The data request may include, but may not be limited to, the following types of information: ► Maps of site showing property boundary boundaries, landfill waste footprint, topography and other relevant site features ► Metes and bounds survey of the site ► Locations and sizing of utilities ► Reports on site conditions, including geotechnical ► Historical tonnage data, by material type ► Residential and commercial growth projections ► Existing solid waste and recycling contracts ► Permitting and engineering documents for the closed landfill ► Information on local permitting requirements ► Other information that may be determined to be relevant to the project We recognize that the City may not have all information requested readily available or may track information differently than as requested. We will work with the City’s appointed project manager to arrive at reasonable substitutes for key data, if needed. Once the Project Team receives the information from the preliminary data request, we will conduct an initial review of the data to assess the information and determine if any information requires clarification. Task 1C – Kick-off Meeting Burns & McDonnell will conduct a short kick-out meeting the same day as the planning workshop (Task 2) to review the scope of services, key project objectives and the remaining project schedule with the key City stakeholders for the Study. Burns & McDonnell will also review the planning workshop topics with City staff prior to the planning workshop. Page 52 of 159 3 Task 1D – Secondary Request for Information Following the planning workshop, there may be a need for the Project Team to issue a secondary data request to gather additional information for the Study. Task 1 Deliverables ► Initial data request ► Kick-off meeting agenda and handouts ► Secondary data request Task 2 – P lanning Workshop The planning workshop is the key step in the Study that will allow the Project Team to gather input from City stakeholders regarding the needs and requirements of each transfer station option. The workshop will begin immediately after the kick-off meeting. The workshop will consist of two parts: 1. Discussion of facility needs and requirements with City staff and the City’s transfer station operator, Texas Disposal Systems (TDS) (4-5 hours) 2. Follow-up with City staff to review the feedback by TDS and determine which of their comments and input should be incorporated in the facility requirements (1-2 hours) The planning workshop may include discussion of the following topics, some of which may only apply to one option or the other: ► Planning horizon and building life expectations ► Budget constraints ► Preferred traffic patterns to/from and within site ► Operating hours (waste acceptance and transfer station operations) ► Materials accepted for transfer or diversion ► Green building or LEED requirements ► Building requirements (e.g., fully enclosed, partially enclosed, covered) ► Transfer technology ► Support facility requirements ► Customer service standards ► Other topics as appropriate Task 2 Deliverables ► Workshop agenda and handouts ► Documented meeting notes with key decisions from workshop Page 53 of 159 4 Task 3 – Waste Generation Forecast The Project Team, based on the growth and land use information provided by the City (potentially from the Water Master Plan), will develop a 20-year waste generation forecast. The Project Team will apply average generation rates to projected growth in residential households and commercial businesses to develop the waste generation forecast which will serve as the basis for evaluating the capacity of the transfer station options. The Project Team will send a draft copy of the waste generation forecast to the City for review and comment. Task 3 Deliverables ► Draft and final waste generation forecast ► Conference call to discuss waste generation forecast Task 4 – Develop Planning-Level Designs The Project Team will evaluate two primary transfer station options: ► Option 1 - Modifications to Existing Transfer Station ► Option 2 - New Transfer Station Facility As a first step in evaluating the transfer station options, the Project Team will first develop preliminary, planning-level designs for each option based on the requirements identified in the planning workshop. The purpose of these conceptual designs is provide a basis for evaluating the operational efficacy and capacity and for developing the planning-level cost estimates for each option. If the City decides to move forward with either option, the conceptual designs may serve as starting point for the engineering design phase, but will not serve as a constraint to other design options that may be considered during the design process. For each option, the Project Team will develop a 2D facility site layout, superimposed onto an aerial of the site. For Option 2, the Project Team will also develop a 3D rendering of the facility to provide the City a better visual understanding of the Option 2 planning-level design. The Project Team will schedule one in-person meeting to review the conceptual designs to receive feedback from the City before the conceptual designs are finalized for the purposes of this Study. Task 4 Deliverables ► Conceptual 2D layouts of both options and 3D rendering of Option 2 ► In-person meeting to review draft conceptual designs Page 54 of 159 5 Task 5 – Evaluate Transfer Station Options Although the two options differ significantly, the Project Team will evaluate each option using the same criteria to allow a more equitable comparison of the options. Using the results of the Tasks 2 through 4, Burns & McDonnell will evaluate each option based on the following criteria: ► Operational efficacy ► Capacity ► Safety ► Permitting requirements ► Conceptual level facility cost estimates ► Changes to facility operational costs ► Implementation schedule (permitting, design, construction) ► Impact to collection operations For the capacity of the site, Burns & McDonnell will request capacity estimates from Texas Disposal Systems based on current operations at the existing facility and resources required maximize the capacity of the existing facility. Task 5 Deliverables ► Summary table with description of how each option compares for each of the identified criteria Task 6 – Presentation of Results The results of Tasks 1-5 will be summarized in a PowerPoint presentation for City Council. The Project Team will develop the draft presentation for review by City staff. After gathering comments from City staff, the Project Team will develop a final version of the PowerPoint presentation. Task 6 Deliverables ► Draft and final PowerPoint presentation ► Attendance at one City Council meeting to present findings SCOPE OF SERVICES - SOLID WASTE MASTER PLAN Burns & McDonnell is proposing to assist the City in developing a SWMP that provides the vision and framework to guide future activities and to develop the infrastructure, programs and policies needed to manage the City’s solid waste for the next 20 years. Our experience shows that effective solid waste management plans: ► Reflect the planning region’s values and guiding principles for waste management and diversion ► Establish local waste management planning goals Page 55 of 159 6 ► Include analysis and consideration of reasonable alternatives Burns & McDonnell is committed to working with the City to address the following issues in developing this SWMP: ► Evaluate transfer station facility operations and facility improvements ► Develop projections for future transfer station facility needs and options ► Evaluate existing solid waste and recycling programs, recognizing that the City contracts for services ► Identify preferred strategies to increase diversion rates This document describes Burns & McDonnell’s approach to developing a 20-year solid waste master plan (SWMP) for the City. We have structured the approach into two phases to communicate the purpose of each phase. Phase One (which includes Tasks 1 – 6) will focus on data analysis and evaluating the existing system. This phase also includes the task to facilitate stakeholder participation. Although stakeholder input is listed as Task 2, this task will occur during both phases of the plan development. Phase Two (which includes Tasks 7 – 10) will concentrate on evaluating options, developing strategies and implementation plans. In a separate scope of work, Burns & McDonnell will provide an initial evaluation of the City’s transfer station and potential options; the results from this analysis will be integrated into the SWMP. We would expect that the SWMP will help to refine potential features that would need to be included in a future transfer station, if the City opts to build a new transfer station. The following graphic summarizes the planning process. Page 56 of 159 7 PHASE ONE – DATA ANALYSIS AND EVALUATED EXISTING SYSTEM Task 1 – Project Management, Information Request, and Project Kick-off Task 1A – Provide Project Management and Oversite To implement the proposed approach, a high level of project management and oversight will be provided throughout the project. Our Project Manager, Scott Pasternak, will be responsible for meeting the project budget and schedule. Scott has a proven track record of completing challenging solid waste management and planning projects for local governments across Texas and the nearby states. Regular communication will be maintained between the Project Team and City staff through formal and informal efforts. This project management task is based on an eight month project schedule. Task 1B – Information Request Approximately five working days following receipt of the Notice to Proceed for the project, we will provide the City with a preliminary data request that encompasses the data needs for completing the SWMP. Page 57 of 159 8 Task 1C – Kick-off Meeting The purpose of the kick-off meeting is to initiate the project and confirm the project objectives, scope of work and schedule. A meeting will be scheduled with designated City staff and key members of the Project Team. The meeting will accomplish several objectives, including: ► Introduce key members of the Burns & McDonnell Project Team ► Discuss the project timeline and scope ► Discuss the stakeholder engagement process ► Discuss how the on-going transfer station evaluation will be integrated into the SWMP during the planning process ► Identify key issues and develop initial goals for the SWMP Task 1 Deliverables ► Information request summary sheet ► Kick-off meeting agenda Task 2 – Facilitate Stakeholder Participation Process Burns & McDonnell recognizes the importance of gaining community support through active participation of the public from inception to completion of the SWMP. Our approach to the public participation process will include substantial collaboration with City staff in order to seek support and involvement from a broad base of the community in order to have a greater impact on the future of the City’s solid waste strategy. Tasks to be provided by our team for this task include the following: Task 2A – Focus Group with Downtown Customers Understanding that there will be a need to better understand the needs of businesses in the downtown area, we will plan to conduct a focus group discussion with a representative group of property owners and/or tenants. We will schedule and facilitate two focus group discussions with downtown property owners/tenants. Discussion will include but not be limited to a concierge and shared dumpster service approach. We would expect to collaborate with City staff and its solid waste and recycling contractor to identify core entities, such as businesses, that would have an interest in participating based on their needs and waste generation efforts. Our budget is based on conducting two focus groups (on the same day) and having 5 – 12 people at each focus group. We understand this this subtask will need to be completed within 120 days of the Notice to Proceed. Task 2B – Interviews with Key Stakeholders Given the importance of understanding the solid waste and recycling issues and needs of other key customers, Burns & McDonnell will conduct in-person meetings with representatives from the City, Williamson County, Georgetown ISD, Southwestern University and the local apartment association. Page 58 of 159 9 Task 2C – On-line Survey of Georgetown Customers In order for the City to evaluate its solid waste and recycling system and the community’s adaptability to potential changes, we will conduct a public survey of the City’s customers, which would include single- family, multi-family and commercial/industrial. We will develop a survey instrument by working with the City to define appropriate parameters. Survey focal points will be agreed upon between our project team and the City after Task 4 so that the analysis is fully considered in the survey development. Locally-specific factors affecting services, operations, and rates will also be identified and emphasized in the survey design, and will be customized between the customer types. Specifically, there will be different segments of the survey based on whether someone is a single-family, multi-family or commercial/industrial customer. Our budget assumes that Burns & McDonnell will administer the survey on-line via a tool such as Survey Monkey. Burns & McDonnell has accounted for one revision of the survey instrument to ensure a proficient survey form is developed that is suitable for Burns & McDonnell and the City and the university. Once the data has been collected and summarized, Burns & McDonnell will analyze the information collected from City customers and provide recommendations. Our survey approach is designed to obtain public input and may not be statistically valid, as the intent will be to encourage broad participation from customers. We will request that the City promote the survey via press releases, announcements at Council meetings and/or utility bill inserts. Task 2D – City Council Presentations We will conduct presentations at three City Council meetings or workshops during the development of the SWMP. We will coordinate with City staff to determine the preferred times for these meetings. These meetings will also provide a forum to receive public input. Task 2E –Meetings with the City’s Solid Waste and Recycling Contractor Recognizing that the successful implementation of this SWMP will require close collaboration between the City and its solid waste and recycling contractor, Burns & McDonnell will plan to seek input from Texas Disposal Systems (TDS) during the planning process. Our budget assumes that we will conduct four in-person meetings with TDS during the planning process. We will coordinate with City staff to select the ideal times to conduct the workshops and meetings. Burns & McDonnell has developed our approach based on our current understanding of desired stakeholder and public input. We recognize that there could be an interest to solicit a varying degree of stakeholder input. Should this occur, we will be prepared to discuss options with City staff. Task 2 Deliverables ► SWMP section that describes the stakeholder engagement process ► Coordination and conduct of two focus groups with downtown customers; in-person meetings with multiple customers; three City Council meetings; one on-line survey; and four meetings with TDS. Page 59 of 159 10 Task 3 – Summarize and Evaluate Prior Plans, Studies, and Solid Waste Trends, Policies and Regulations Task 3A – Review of Relevant Solid Waste Planning Studies Understanding prior solid waste planning projects completed for other entities is a critical step in effectively and efficiently developing this SWMP for the City. This will include a review of the City’s Comprehensive Plan to gain insight on population and commercial/business forecasts, as well as the regional solid waste management plan completed by CAPCOG. Task 3B – Solid Waste Trends, Policies and Regulatory Review We will identify pertinent trends, key policy initiatives and major regulatory requirements at the Federal, state, and local levels that will have a direct impact on initiatives included within the SWMP. A key aspect of this task will be to focus on efforts occurring in other communities to reduce waste disposal. We will draw on its extensive experience conducting “cutting edge” projects for other local governments that are implementing innovative waste reduction strategies. This section of the SWMP will focus on 10 – 15 trends, which may include but not be limited to topics such as sustainable materials management, circular economy, waste to energy and emerging technologies, landfill trends (e.g. extended capacity via expansions, mining, enhanced leachate recirculation), landfill and recycling tipping fees, contracting for services versus municipalization, high diversion goals by other Texas cities and transfer station hauling distances. Each discussion topic will be approximately 1 – 2 paragraphs. Task 3 Deliverables ► Incorporation of relevant data throughout the SWMP, as appropriate ► SWMP section updates regarding trends, policies and regulations at the Federal, state and local levels Task 4 – Current System Review, Needs Assessment and Public-Private Partnership Analysis Key to the development of the SWMP is gaining a solid understanding of the current system and developing a baseline to which new programs and initiatives can be compared. During this task, we will develop a comprehensive list and description of solid waste services and programs performed by the City and its contractor. As a part of this task, Burns and McDonnell will complete an assessment of the current and new primary programs provided by the City (as detailed at the end of this task). The review will include the following elements: Page 60 of 159 11 ► Description of Service: We will describe key services and programs, including types of equipment used, service level provided (e.g., frequency, containers, set out limits) and other key elements of each service. ► Facilities: Identify current City and private solid waste and recycling facilities located within the City of Georgetown, as well as in the nearby area. Facilities would include landfills, transfer stations, single-stream MRFs and composting facilities. Our research will estimate tipping fees and long-term capacities for each facility. ► Data Review and Analysis: We will summarize data received from the City for each program (e.g., composition of recyclable materials, participation rates, annual pounds per household of residential refuse and recyclables and other similar data). This effort will focus on evaluating current recycling and diversion rates, as well as disposal rates. As appropriate, relevant data will be compared to similar metrics from other communities in Texas. ► Benchmarking: Compare the City’s programs to comparable programs in the region that are serviced by the public and private sectors. ► Alignment with Goals and Objectives of the SWMP: We will identify whether the service as currently provided in the City aligns with the goals and objectives of the SWMP, as identified by City staff. In addition, we will identify specific aspects of each service that could be changed to bring the service into further alignment with stated goals and objectives. ► Key Findings and Recommendations: We will provide key findings and recommendations regarding each service that will be considered for implementation in the planning process. As appropriate, we will also identify services, programs or facilities to be modified. In addition to review and analysis of data, we will conduct the following activities in order to develop the assessment of each service and program. ► Staff Interviews: We will interview key City staff. The purpose of the interviews is to permit the Project Team to develop a more thorough understanding of the perceived strengths, weaknesses, threats and opportunities facing the City. ► Field Observations: Field observations allow us to obtain a true feel for the challenges faced, productivity levels achieved, successes and areas needing improvement. ► Industry Interviews: We will interview the City’s current solid waste and recycling contractor. The purpose of the interviews is to permit the Project Team to develop a more thorough understanding of the solid waste and recycling issues facing the City. This interview will also assist our team to identify potential public-private partnerships that could be considered by the City. This interview will be in addition to the meetings described in Task 2E. Programs to be included in the review will include the following. We will review each program based on the methodology described in this Task. • Organizational Structure and Staffing Levels • Construction and Demolition (C&D) • Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) Page 61 of 159 12 • Residential Refuse Collection • Residential Recycling Collection • Residential Yard Waste Collection • Residential Brush and Bulky Collection • Commercial/Industrial Refuse and Recycling (including open/closed market) • Planning Review Process for Solid Waste and Recycling Infrastructure • Transfer Station, Collection Station and Disposal System • Closed Landfill Future Use (high level) • Downtown Area Collections (concierge, shared, undergoround) • Multi-Family Program • Recycling Processing • Mulch and Compost Processing • Biosolids • Reuse and Source Reduction • Special Waste (e-waste, tires, BOPA) • Green Purchasing • Product Stewardship and Extended Producer Responsibility • Public Outreach and Programs • Citywide Sustainability Efforts • Rate Structure (consider variable rates) Task 4 Deliverables ► Current System Review, Needs Assessment and Public-Private Partnership Analysis Section of the SWMP Task 5 – Waste Generation Forecast Building on Task 3 from the Transfer Station Planning Study, Burns and McDonnell will further refine the waste generation forecast. From the Transfer Station Planning Study Scope of Services, based on the growth and land use information provided by the City, we will develop a 20 year waste generation forecast. We will apply average generation rates to projected growth in residential and multi-family households and commercial businesses to develop the waste generation forecast which will serve as the basis for evaluating the capacity of the transfer station options. For the SWMP, Burns & McDonnell will also account for what the City is currently diverting from being landfilled. This task will involve developing a waste characterization by material types for the residential and non- residential generator types. We will complete this task by reviewing and utilizing data from other waste characterization studies that have been completed by other cities in Texas and/or using data from the US EPA. We will also request data from the City’s existing solid waste and recycling contractor for other cities and customers in the region (on an aggregated basis, if needed to address potential confidentiality issues). Task 5 Deliverables ► Waste Generation and Composition section of the SWMP, including tables and charts summarizing the solid waste stream by generator (e.g. Single and multi-family and commercial) and material type. Page 62 of 159 13 Task 6 – Determine Facility Capacity and Forecast Future Solid Waste Disposal and Recycling Needs Based on the results of the Transfer Station Evaluation Study and the projections from Task 5, we will evaluate whether existing facilities for transfer, disposal, composting and recycling have sufficient capacity to meet the City’s long-term needs (understanding the City contracts for transfer operations and disposal). This will also include a broad planning level overview of how regional growth could potentially impact landfill and transfer station capacity in the region. Based on this analysis, we will establish the baseline information needed to evaluate the City’s future needs for transfer, disposal, recycling and composting. Specific to the City’s transfer station, we will evaluate whether the City could have a long-term need to consider developing a second transfer station. In this task, we will also restate projections based on the analysis that will be included in the Transfer Station Planning Study. Task 6 Deliverables ► Facility Capacity Analysis and Forecast of Future Facility Needs Section of the SWMP, including tables and charts that will provide an understanding of current and future capacity. PHASE TWO – EVALUATING OPTIONS AND DEVELOPING STRATEGIES AND IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Task 7 – Review Phase One and Establish SWMP Goals and Objectives Task 7A – Workshop to Review Results of Phase 1 We will conduct a one day workshop with City staff to review the results of Phase One. Results from these tasks will enable the City to develop a clear picture of the current system, future needs, and ultimately, what future initiatives should be included in the SWMP. Task 7B – Establish SWMP Objectives During the same workshop as described in Task 7A, we will work with City staff and facilitate a process to establish the goals and objectives of the SWMP. Clearly defining the objectives of the SWMP is a critical step, as the objectives will create a framework for evaluating potential future initiatives. This facilitated process will build on initial discussions from the kick-off meeting. For example, our team expects that an important focus of the City’s solid waste program in the future will be to examine the following: ► Move from residential focus to a global/all waste within the City focus ► Develop and implement strategies to foster market driven collection and diversion programs ► Foster collaborative public/private partnerships to increase diversion and manage costs ► Develop a capital improvement plan for the funding of future infrastructure ► Evaluate options to continue increasing recycling and decrease disposal Page 63 of 159 14 Task 7 Deliverables ► Workshop with City staff to review Phase One and to establish SWMP objectives ► Section of the SWMP that describes the SWMP objectives and goals Task 8 – Identify Alternative Strategies and Evaluate Options Task 8A – Identify Alternative Strategies The range of solid waste and recycling management strategies and practices to be considered will include key options available to the City. Based on the results of our analysis completed during Tasks 1-7, we will compile a summary of preliminary alternative strategies and program options that the City may wish to consider including in the SWMP. Strategies and options may be enhancements to current services or new initiatives. We will present the initial list of issues/options to City staff during a workshop. For each issue, we will provide a listing and description of potential program options and strategies that could be considered. The purpose of this discussion will be to seek input regarding the types of options that are of the greatest interest and should be further evaluated, as described in Task 8B. During the workshop, we will focus on facilitating that decisions are made using sound methodology and objective criteria. Our role during the workshops will be to serve as an “opinionated facilitator,” as we will provide our solid waste experience. Task 8B – Evaluate Options Burns & McDonnell will compile, in a matrix format, a summary of preliminary alternative strategies and program options that the City may wish to consider as future enhancements to their current “menu” of solid waste and waste minimization services. We will provide a summary of the benefits and drawbacks associated with each of the preliminary strategies and program options. In evaluating each of these strategies and options we will, at a minimum, take into consideration the following factors: ● Environmental ● Financial ● Operational ● Regulatory ● Public “buy-in” ● Sustainability of operations We will also provide conceptual cost estimates and financing options for key (but not all) strategies being considered by the City. It is envisioned that upon delivery of the alternative strategies and program options, our team will conduct a workshop with City staff to discuss the merits of each of the strategies and program options as well as further refine the strategies associated with any modifications to the existing services. Input from the City staff concerning their comments, questions and recommendations regarding this analysis will be thoroughly vetted during this meeting. Based on this meeting, the preferred strategies and program options will be selected from those items identified earlier in this task. Page 64 of 159 15 Task 8 Deliverables ► SWMP section summarizing preliminary alternative strategies and program options, including a feasibility matrix table ► SWMP section that evaluates each of the preliminary strategies and program options Task 9 – Develop 20 Year Implementation Plan and Funding Plan The Burns & McDonnell Project Team will meet with City staff to discuss the results of the analysis completed during Task 8. The goal of this meeting will be to discuss the effectiveness of each of the options and to prioritize the order as well as potential timing of these options that should be considered for implementation. Once these options are identified, a discussion of the strategies to be utilized to assist in the implementation of the options will begin. The prioritization of these items will also include a range of time during which the implementation of these options and strategies should be considered. We will provide both short (0 -5 years), medium (6-10) and long-term (11-20 years) implementation recommendations by service, program and facility type. We will develop a planning level implementation plan that will describe the specific activities associated with implementing each of the strategies and options. For each activity listed in the Implementation Plan, our team will identify the following: ► Description of activity to be taken ► The date(s) the activity will be carried out ► The responsible party(s) ► The projected operating and capital cost ► Potential funding sources It is our experience that this level of detail enhances the likelihood that these activities will be implemented since it provides a clear explanation of what should be accomplished within a given time period. The Implementation Plan will be created in a format that allows the City to sort the activities by year, by responsible party, and by cost. In this way, it will be easy to review the activities in the Implementation Plan in different ways that aid in implementation. For example, this will allow City staff to generate an annual budget for each of the 20 years, as well as generate a “to do” list and schedule for each responsible party. This task also includes the development of a CIP and funding plan. The CIP will include year-by-year details of services, programs and facilities needed by type and potential location. The Implementation Plan will be more detailed for the short-term recommendations, as compared to the medium and long-term recommendations. Task 9 Deliverables ► SWMP section that summarizes the key activities to be accomplished in support of successfully implementing each strategy and option Page 65 of 159 16 Task 10 – Prepare Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan All of the task deliverables described in prior tasks will be compiled into a draft SWMP. As discussed throughout the Scope of Services, Burns & McDonnell will deliver individual sections of the SWMP to City staff as they are drafted in an effort to expedite the review process. The complete draft will be provided initially for City staff review. A second draft will be developed to incorporate comments from City staff. We will coordinate with City staff to (1) seek public review and comments; and (2) obtain approval for the SWMP from City Council (as described in Task 2). Task 10 Deliverables ► Two draft and one final version of the SWMP BUDGET Burns & McDonnell’s estimated budget for both Scopes of Services follows, inclusive of professional fees and expenses. Page 66 of 159 17 Task Budget Transfer Station Evaluation Task 1 – Project Initiation and Management $2,940 Task 2 – Planning Workshop $7,310 Task 3 – Waste Generation Forecast $1,840 Task 4 – Develop Conceptual Designs $11,810 Task 5 – Evaluate Transfer Station Options $11,230 Task 6 – Presentation of Results $3,230 Transfer Station Evaluation Subtotal $38,360 Solid Waste Management Plan Task 1 – Project Management, Information Requested, and Project Kick-off Task 1A – Provide Project Management and Oversite $5,200 Task 1B – Information Request $1,900 Task 1C – Kick-off Meeting $2,700 Task 2 – Facilitate Stakeholder Participation Process Task 2A – Focus Group with Downtown Customers $3,500 Task 2B – Interviews with Key Stakeholders $4,900 Task 2C – On-line Survey of Georgetown Customers $9,800 Task 2D – City Council Presentations $9,200 Task 2E – Meetings with the City’s Solid Waste and Recycling Contractor $7,000 Task 3 – Summarize and Evaluate Prior Plans, Studies, and Solid Waste Trends, Policies and Regulations Task 3A – Review of Relevant Solid Waste Planning Studies $1,200 Task 3B – Solid Waste Trends, Policies and Regulatory Review $4,700 Task 4 – Current System Review, Needs Assessment & Public-Private Analysis $20,300 Task 5 – Waste Generation Forecast $7,300 Task 6 – Determine Facility Capacity and Forecast Future Solid Waste Disposal and Recycling Needs $7,300 Task 7 - Review Phase One and Establish SWMP Goals and Objectives Task 7A – Workshop to Review Results of Phase $5,200 Task 7B – Establish SWMP Objectives $3,900 Task 8 - Identify Alternative Strategies and Evaluate Options Task 8A – Identify Alternative Strategies $22,600 Task 8B – Evaluate Options $22,600 Task 9 - Develop 20 Year Implementation Plan and Funding Plan $7,500 Task 10 - Prepare Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan $12,700 Solid Waste Management Plan Subtotal $159,50 0 Page 67 of 159 18 Total Budget $197,860 SCHEDULE The project schedule for both Scopes of Services is attached. Page 68 of 159 Task 1 Project Management, Information Request, and Project Kick‐off 1A Provide Project Management and Oversite 1B Information Request 1C Kick‐off Meeting G Task 2 Facilitate Stakeholder Participation Process 2A Focus Group with Downtown Customers P 2B Interviews with Key Stakeholders 2C On‐line Survey of Georgetown Customers 2D City Council Presentations (three meetings)1 1st CC 2nd CC 3rd CC 2E Meetings with the City's Solid Waste and Recycling Contractor  (four meetings)1 1st TDS Task 3 Summarize and Evaluate Prior Plans, Studies, and Solid Waste  Trends, Policies, and Regulations 3A Review of Relevant Solid Waste Planning Studies 3B Solid Waste Trends, Policies and Regulatory Review Task 4 Current System Review, Needs Assessment and Public‐Private  Partnership Analysis Task 5 Waste Generation Forecast (and Waste Characterization) Task 6 Determine Facility Capacity and Forecast Futute Solid Waste  Disposal and Recycling Needs Task 7 Review Phase One and Establish SWMP Goals and Objectives 7A Workshop to Review Results of Phase One G 7B Establish SWMP Objectives G Task 8 Identify Alternative Strategies and Evaluate Options 8A Identify Alternative Strategies G 8B Evaluate Options Task 9 Develop 20 Year Implementation Plan and Funding Plan G Task 10 Prepare Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan Task 1 Project Initiation and Management 1A Project Management 1B Initial Request for Information 1C Kick‐off Meeting G 1D Secondary Request for Information Task 2 Planning Workshop G, TDS Task 3 Waste Generation Forecast G Task 4 Develop Planning‐Level Designs G Task 5 Evaluate Transfer Station Options Task 6 Presentation of Results CC Notes: Burns & McDonnell Meetings/Workshops/Conference Calls with: CC City Council G City P Public TDS Texas Disposal Systems 1. Proposed dates are tentative, pending confirmation with the City.  For items 2D: City Council Presentations and 2E: Meetings with Contractor (TDS), Burns & McDonnell with coordinate with the City to identify preferred dates and times for first and all subsequent meetings. DRAFT: Solid Waste Master Plan and Transfer Station Evaluation Study Project Schedules Solid Waste Master Plan Transfer Station Evaluation Study Aug‐18Nov‐17 Dec‐17 Jan‐18 Feb‐18 Apr‐18 May‐18 Jun‐18 Jul‐18Mar‐18 Page 69 of 159 City of Georgetown, Texas Transportation Advisory Board October 13, 2017 SUBJECT: Cons id eration and p o s s ib le rec o mmendation on Tas k Ord er KPA-18-001 to Kas b erg, P atric k, and Assoc iates, LP o f Georgetown, TX in the amount of $533,072.00 fo r Pavement C o nditio n Indic es and Five Year Street Maintenanc e P ro gram - Wes ley Wright, P.E., Sys tems Engineering Direc tor ITEM SUMMARY: Approximately every 3 years the City o f Geo rgeto wn c o nducts a s tud y o f the c o nditio n o f all o f the city's s treets . This s tud y cons is ts o f a highly spec ialized van driving virtually every mile of city s treet and gathering d etailed info rmation on overall pavement cond ition - crac king, po tho les , rid e quality, roughness, rutting, raveling, and appearance. The d ata o b tained is us ed to generate ind ivid ual s c ores fo r eac h s treet and an o verall p avement cond ition index (PCI) s c o re for the c ity. Those s cores are then used to d evelop a street maintenanc e master plan d etailing recommended maintenance meas ures . Thes e results are the b as is fo r eac h year's recommend ed CIP Street Maintenanc e P ro gram. Additio nally, this s tudy ens ures the c ity maintains its commitment to GASB 34 ac c o unting p rinc ip les . It als o help s judge the relative effec tiveness o f various pavement maintenanc e metho d s us ed in prior years. KPA has managed and provid ed engineering s ervic es for this study for the c ity s inc e the PCI's inceptio n in 2008. Their p rimary s ubc o nsultant, Dynates t, has c o nducted similar s tud ies fo r multiple entities thro ughout the c o untry and is one of the ind ustry lead ers in this type o f analysis. Results are expec ted in the S p ring of 2018. Staff rec o mmends ap p ro val of this tas k o rd er. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Funds are available in the S treet Maintenanc e Capital Improvement Plan Bud get. SUBMITTED BY: Wes ley Wright ATTACHMENTS: Description Type KPA PCI Tas k Order Backup Material Page 70 of 159 TASK ORDER Georgetown – Revised 3.11 EJCDC E-505 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Engineer Professional Services—Task Order Edition Copyright ©2004 National Society of Professional Engineers for EJCDC. All rights reserved. Attachment 1 – Task Order Form Page 1 of 4 Task Order In accordance with paragraph 1.01 of the Master Services Agreement between Owner and Kasberg, Patrick & Associates, LP (“Engineer”) for Professional Services – Task Order Edition, dated March 23, 2016 ("Agreement"), Owner and Engineer agree as follows: 1. Specific Project Data A. Title: Pavement Condition Indices & Five Year Street Maintenance Program B. Description: Professional Engineering Services to develop Pavement Condition Indices and develop a Street Maintenance Program for the City of Georgetown Roadway Network. This project involves gathering data on the City of Georgetown’s roadway network to develop Pavement Condition Indices (PCI) and develop a 5-year Street Maintenance Program (SMP) for roadway maintenance. Deliverables will include reports of the City network’s PCI, a 5-year SMP, and data for input into the CarteGraph Pavement database. This project also includes additional services to provide an asset inventory of City of Georgetown owned assets located within the road networks right of way. C. City of Georgetown Project Number: ______________________________________________ D. City of Georgetown General Ledger Account No.: ____________________________________ E. City of Georgetown Purchase Order No. ___________________________________________ F. Master Services Agreement, Contract Number: 2016-730-MSA_________________________ Services of Engineer See Exhibit A, Scope of Services, attached 3. Owner's Responsibilities Owner shall have those responsibilities set forth in the Agreement subject to the following: The City of Georgetown will provide records and data of the existing Pavement Management System and all information on existing utilities within remediation projects 4. Times for Rendering Services Phase Completion Date Notice to Proceed December 1, 2017 Complete Pavement Condition Indices March 1, 2018 60% Submittal 5 Year SMP April 15, 2018 95% Submittal 5 Year SMP May 15, 2018 100% Submittal 5 Year SMP June 15, 2018 Task Order No. KPA-18-001-TO, consisting of _89__ pages Page 71 of 159 TASK ORDER Georgetown – Revised 3.11 EJCDC E-505 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Engineer Professional Services—Task Order Edition Copyright ©2004 National Society of Professional Engineers for EJCDC. All rights reserved. Attachment 1 – Task Order Form Page 2 of 4 5. Payments to Engineer A. Owner shall pay Engineer for services rendered as follows: Category of Services Compensation Method Lump Sum or Not to Exceed Amount of Compensation for Services Basic Services Pavement Conditions Survey & Five Year Street Maintenance Program A. Lump Sum: Basic Services – PCI Survey & 5 YR SMP B. Lump Sum: Additional Services - Asset Inventory Total Professional Services $394,480.00 $138,592.00 $533,072.00 B. The terms of payment are set forth in Article 4 of the Agreement unless modified in this Task Order. 6. Consultants: Kasberg, Patrick & Associates, LP – Georgetown, Texas Dynatest North America, Inc. – Austin, Texas 7. Other Modifications to Agreement: None 8. Attachments: Exhibit A – Scope of Services Exhibit B – Fee Schedules 9. Documents Incorporated By Reference: The Agreement effective March 23, 2016. Page 72 of 159 Page 73 of 159 TASK ORDER Georgetown – Revised 3.11 EJCDC E-505 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Engineer Professional Services—Task Order Edition Copyright ©2004 National Society of Professional Engineers for EJCDC. All rights reserved. Attachment 1 – Task Order Form Page 4 of 4 Owner: Engineer: Designated Representative for Task Order: Designated Representative for Task Order: Name: Michael Hallmark Name: Trae Sutton, P.E., CFM Title: CIP Manager Title: Senior Project Manager Address: 300-1 Industrial Ave Address: 1008 South Main Street Georgetown, TX 78626 Georgetown, TX 78626 Phone: (512) 930-3569 Phone: (512) 819-9478 Fax: (512) 930-3559 Fax: (254) 773-6667 E-Mail: Michael.hallmark@georgetown.org E-Mail: TSutton@kpaengineers.com Page 74 of 159 EXHIBIT A DETAILED SCOPE of SERVICES PROVIDED BY ENGINEER KASBERG, PATRICK & ASSOCIATES, LP GEORGETOWN, TEXAS Project Description: This project involves gathering data on the City of Georgetown’s roadway network to develop Pavement Condition Indices (PCI) and develop a 5-year Street Maintenance Plan (SMP) for roadway maintenance. Deliverables will include reports of the City network’s PCI, a 5-year SMP, and data for input into the CarteGraph Pavement View Plus database. The project will also include Program Management. Scope of Services: The scope of services for this project to be provided by the ENGINEER includes developing the Pavement Condition Indices and the 5-year Street Maintenance Plan for the roadways within the City of Georgetown network as well as the Program Management of these projects. The project will evaluate the City’s roadway network. This will include utilizing Geographic Information System (GIS) and the existing Pavement Management System (PMS) as well as other inventory sources. After all of the existing data has been analyzed, the process of collection of distress and profile data will begin. Automated Distress data will be collected on the City’s road network. This process will involve collecting digital images of the pavement surface and cracking distresses extracted from the images. Rutting and ride will be recorded with laser systems that can scan the transverse and longitudinal road profiles. The distress data will be uploaded to the pavement segment surveyed. Additionally, ride index values will be developed from the International Roughness Index values recorded in the field. All of the data gathered will then be developed into a system that methodically produces organized areas of the City of Georgetown. In the field observations of each area will be reviewed to confirm the results of the data collected. This will be accomplished by inspecting the streets. Areas in question will be reviewed jointly with City Staff. A maintenance and remediation program will be developed. Different maintenance methods will be developed during the review of the streets in the field. These will include, but not be limited to sub-grade stabilization and overlay, drainage enhancement and pavement rehabilitation, hot-in-place asphalt recycling, surface treatments, asphalt rejuvenation, asphalt overlays, etc. Visual collection of data will include reviewing the street to determine if the data collection is accurate and looking at contributing issues, such as drainage, that are creating poor PCI numbers. At this time a meeting with City Staff will be held to review the conclusions before proceeding to development of the report and the 5-year SMP. The final report and the 5- year SMP with cost estimates will be developed with graphical representation of the project. A final meeting with City Staff will be scheduled to review the final document, reports and illustrations. After final comments the final report, illustrations and cost estimates will be Page 75 of 159 delivered. Digital copies of the reports as well as CarteGraph data files for use by the City will also be submitted. A General Project Scope follows; I. Pavement Condition Surveys A. Develop program B. Review Inventory C. Data Collection, Quality Control and Upload D. Routing E. Equipment Calibration F. Data Collection in the field II. Overall Pavement Condition Index and Inventory City Roadway Infrastructure A. Data Processing B. Review and Update Current Database C. Upload to CarteGraph D. Develop initial strategies E. Review all the data developed from the data collection phase of the project F. Organize data into segments within the City G. Develop graphical representation of the data collected. H. Identify locations that do not meet the Council directed PCI of 85 I. Inventory roadway infrastructure J. Review locations of undesirable PCI in the field K. Develop exhibits that illustrate locations of questionable PCI L. Review questionable locations with City Staff M. Complete overall PCI and roadway infrastructure inventory Page 76 of 159 III. Development of 5-year SMP A. Organize deficient streets into geographical areas B. Develop options for rehabilitation C. Develop projects for sustainability in bidding and construction D. Organize project and develop graphical representation E. Prepare cost estimates for all projects in all rehabilitation methods F. Review projects and rehabilitation methods with City Staff G. Develop 5-year SMP projects with graphical representation and cost estimates H. Review documents with City Staff I. Produce preliminary draft for 5-year SMP J. Review preliminary draft with City Staff K. Develop final 5-year SMP, graphical representation, cost estimates, maps, etc. L. Deliver 10 copies of the report, maps, graphical representations and cost estimates to City Staff (Editorial comment – These are a FINAL deliverable, not due until the 5-year SMP has been approved.) M. Develop and present a presentation to GTAB and City Council reviewing the proposed 5-year SMP Page 77 of 159 A Detailed Project Scope follows; I. Pavement Condition Surveys A. The ENGINEER will coordinate the project through the City of Georgetown and gather information for data collection. Confirmations of condition data will be obtained and verification of format delivery. Specific discussions and verification will be held concerning the processing and use of PMS and GIS information. B. The ENGINEER will conduct an official inventory of the roads to be surveyed. Any inventory data identified as being required for the proposed PMS or found to be missing or inaccurate will be located or collected. This will be reviewed and consulted with City Staff. C. The ENGINEER will assist the City in identifying and resolving discrepancies between data sets in its inventory. These data sets include any existing databases and GIS data files. D. The ENGINEER will provide quality control checks for the GIS and PMS database. E. The ENGINEER will collect digital images of the pavement surface and cracking distresses will be extracted from the images. Laser systems will be utilized to scan the transverse and longitudinal road profiles to determine rutting and ride. F. The ENGINEER will upload the distress data to the pavement management system to determine a calculated Pavement Condition Index (PCI). The data collected will be on approximately 384 test miles of the City of Georgetown’s roadway network. G. The ENGINEER will develop a routing process based on the final road listing developed. H. The ENGINEER will perform equipment checks and calibrations to ensure the quality of the data. The data collection database will be uploaded and tested on field computers. I. The ENGINEER will collect, store and transfer to the City digital images on portable Universal Serial Bus (USB) drives. These images can be used for subsequent evaluations and comparisons by the City. J. The ENGINEER will perform data collection in accordance with ASTM Standard E-1656 (Standard Guide for Classification of Automated Pavement Condition Survey Equipment), utilizing a Class 1 device as defined by the specifications. K. The ENGINEER will collect transverse profile data using a 5-sensor profiler to locate the presence of ruts and/or irregularities in the cross slope or utilize area scan lasers obtaining a full cross sectional profile. This will determine the rutting characteristics for each of the roadway segments profiled. This will be performed in accordance with ASTM Standard E-1656 (Standard Guide for Classification of Automated Pavement Condition Survey Equipment) and ASTM Test Standard E-950 (Standard Test Method for Measuring Longitudinal Profile of Traveled Surfaces with an Accelerometer Established Inertial Profiling Reference). The transverse profile will be recorded every Page 78 of 159 ten feet and summarized as an average “rut depth” for each wheel path over the roadway segment. L. The ENGINEER will collect longitudinal profile data simultaneously with the transverse profile data at 0.5 foot intervals throughout the length of each section selected in each direction and summarized at 0.01 to 0.1 mile intervals to provide International Roughness Indices (IRI) throughout the network. The collected IRI values will be reported as an average IRI value for each roadway segment. This will be performed in accordance with ASTM Test Standard E950 (Standard Test Method for Measuring Longitudinal Profile of Traveled Surfaces with an Accelerometer Established Inertial Profiling Reference). II. Overall Pavement Condition Index and Inventory City Roadway Infrastructure A. The ENGINEER will extract the following PCC distresses, if any, from the images – 1) Cracked Slabs 2) Shattered Slabs 3) Corner Breaks 4) Faulting. B. The ENGINEER will extract the following AC distresses from the images – 1) Alligator Cracking 2) Longitudinal Cracking 3) Transverse Cracking 4) Block Cracking. C. The ENGINEER will extract rutting from the profile information. D. The ENGINEER will develop IRI for each roadway and report. This will be converted to a Ride Condition Index (RCI). This will be reported on a 0 to 100 scale. E. The ENGINEER will review and update the current database. The database will be converted to SQL/SQL Express. Microsoft Access is being phased out and no longer functions with CarteGraph versions 8.2 or greater. 8.2 is the current version. SQL databases allow for larger databases than Access. F. The ENGINEER will upload to CarteGraph. The upload will include distress inspection and asset inventory information to the CarteGraph Software. G. The ENGINEER will take photographs in the field by utilizing the downward pavement camera and the forward right-of-way camera. Copies will be provided to the City on USB drive. Upload of any data for distress or ride will be an update to the existing system. Upload of right-of-way and/or pavement images taken during data collection will be attached to the asset records in the Pavement View (all ROW/Pavement Images) module. H. The ENGINEER will review all of the data developed from the collection phase for the project. Data will be analyzed for PCI scores with the data being managed for area s of grouped scores above and below the required PCI of 85. I. The ENGINEER will organize the data in to areas and segments within the City. The segments will be broken out into geographical locations to develop projects. J. The ENGINEER will develop graphical representations of the data collected within the segments established. The streets and areas will be color coded to show PCI scores on a Page 79 of 159 ten point range based on above and below the required PCI score of 85. Each ten point range will be assigned a color and streets will be reviewed in detail to deliver a score for street segments. This will create areas of interest for review. K. The ENGINEER will review the graphical representations created with City Staff illustrating the areas that do not meet the PCI minimum of 85. L. The ENGINEER will review and inventory the streets in the field to verify the data collected during Phase I of the project. Notes on areas of questionable data will be made with graphical representations developed. Contributing conditions wi ll be reviewed for inclusion in the SMP development. These will include drainage issues, driveways, curb and gutter deficiencies, pavement structure, etc. M. The ENGINEER will meet with City Staff to review the locations that are questionable. Field visits will be made to have a consensus of the PCI of these areas. N. The ENGINEER will develop the overall PCI based on the data, field reviews and meetings. Final exhibits and maps shall be created for the City’s Roadway network. O. The ENGINEER will evaluate the financial impacts of having an overall PCI Score of 80, 85 and 90. III. Development of 5 Year SMP A. The ENGINEER will organize the deficient streets developed in Phase II into geographical areas of the City. These shall focus on areas that can create projects that can be bid and constructed. Attention will be paid to traffic control issues, main thoroughfares, construction procedures, need for utility adjustments or replacements, etc. B. The ENGINEER will provide a summary of the financial impacts of adjusting the current minimum overall PCI Score of 85 to PCI Scores of 80 and 90 respectively. C. The ENGINEER will develop options for rehabilitation. These shall include full street re-construction, subgrade stabilization and paving, hot in place asphalt recycling, surface treatments, etc. D. The ENGINEER will prepare cost estimates for all rehabilitation methods. These will be based on historical data and discussions with contractors. Unit prices will be developed for utilization in the development of the SMP. E. The ENGINEER will develop and organize projects to be considered for the 5-year SMP. Projects will be created that are sustainable for bidding and construction. These will be placed into exhibits to show locations of projects and begin the exhibits that will illustrate the final 5-year SMP. F. The ENGINEER will assign rehabilitation methods for the projects developed. These will be based on the methods developed in the beginning part of this phase of the project. These will be assigned in the exhibits. A meeting w ith City Staff will be Page 80 of 159 scheduled to review the projects and discuss the rehabilitation methods for each area. Confirmation of the budget for each year of the 5-year SMP will be discussed and documented to develop the final 5-year SMP. All comments will be addressed and agreed upon prior to proceeding with the final documents. G. The ENGINEER shall develop the final 5-year SMP. The budget for each year of the SMP will be the basis for project development to maximize the rehabilitation of the City’s roadway network and maintain the overall City PCI. Projects will be developed and organized by method of rehabilitation and geographical area as practical. Contributing factors for poor PCI scores will be addressed within the projects and incorporated into the projects. Meetings with the City’s utility project manager will occur to establish any City utilities within the project(s) limits that need to be addressed during the construction phase. Costs for rehabilitation or reconstruction of utilities will be developed for the final report, but separated such that individual budgets are established. Each year of the SMP will have projects established with estimated costs and exhibits. Water and wastewater rehabilitation needs will be determined and planned in conjunction with the Water Services Division. An overall exhibit will also be created for the 5-year SMP. A report for the 5-year SMP will be developed as well. H. The ENGINEER shall schedule a series of meetings with City Staff to review and edit the 5-year SMP. Notes will be developed and incorporated into all documents. I. The ENGINEER shall produce the final estimates and exhibits 5-year SMP and deliver ten sets to City Staff. J. The ENGINEER shall produce a power point presentation and prepare to present the presentation to GTAB and City Staff for the 5-year SMP. Page 81 of 159 Dynatest North America, Inc. Technical Proposal Pavement Condition Survey and Pavement Management Services Prepared For City of Georgetown, Texas Proposal Date: 28 September 2017 DYNATEST NORTH AMERICA, INC. 2217 West Braker Lane Austin, Texas 78758 www.dynatest.com Page 82 of 159 Page i DYNATEST NORTH AMERICA, INC. 2217 West Braker Lane Austin, Texas 78758 USA Telephone +1 512 521 5008 FAX +1 904 964-3749 Webpage: www.dynatest.com E-mail: usa@dynatest.com Pavement Engineering Specialists and Equipment September 28, 2017 Mr. Alvin R. “Trae” Sutton, P.E. Kasberg, Patrick & Associates, LB 1008 South Main Street Georgetown, TX 78726 Tel: 512.819.9478 Email: TSutton@kpaengineers.com Dear Mr. Sutton, Dynatest North America, Inc. (Dynatest) is pleased to submit our cost proposal and technical approach to Kasberg, Patrick & Associates to provide automated ride, distress surveying, asset inventory, and analysis on approximately 330 centerline miles of paved urban roads in Georgetown, Texas. Dynatest has vast experience in collecting, analyzing and reporting ride, rut and pavement distress data for City, County, State and Toll road agencies around the world. Our projects range from less than 100 lane miles up to more than 90,000 lane miles per survey – all of them completed on-time and within budget. We are confident that we can exceed the expectations of the City of Georgetown on this current project. Dynatest has significant experience working in the Central Texas area. Dynatest has performed pavement condition inspections for the City of Austin and SH 130. Additionally, our project manager, Reuben Williams, has performed dozens of implementations across the state of Texas over the past thirteen years with numerous projects in the Central Texas area: Georgetown, Pflugerville, San Marcos, Travis County, Cedar Park, and Austin. For the past 16 years, Dynatest performed the statewide PMIS data collection for the Texas Department of Transportation, on more than 90,000 miles of state maintained roads, covering the entire state of Texas. We understand the technical requirements and delivery schedule deadlines required by the City of Georgetown, and we are confident that we can exceed your expectations on both fronts. The project understanding and our proposed approach are detailed in the following sections of this proposal. We thank you for the opportunity to provide our services. Sincerely, DYNATEST NORTH AMERICA INC. TBPE Firm Registration No. F-17608 Robert R. Williams, P.E., APMP Senior Engineer / Branch Manager Page 83 of 159 Page ii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 PROJECT UNDERSTANDING .................................................................................................................. 1 2 PROJECT STAFFING ............................................................................................................................... 1 2.1 Project Manager............................................................................................................................ 1 2.2 Project Team ................................................................................................................................. 5 2.2.1 Senior Engineers ................................................................................................................. 5 2.2.2 Project Engineers ................................................................................................................ 6 2.2.3 Data Processing ................................................................................................................... 6 2.2.4 Data Upload and Quality Control ........................................................................................ 6 2.2.5 Key Technical Staff .............................................................................................................. 7 2.2.6 Lead Equipment Operators and PCI Inspectors .................................................................. 7 2.2.7 Resumes .............................................................................................................................. 7 3 EXPERIENCE .......................................................................................................................................... 8 3.1 Company Information and History ............................................................................................... 8 3.2 Sample Projects ........................................................................................................................... 10 3.2.1 Sample Project # 1 ............................................................................................................ 10 3.2.2 Sample Project # 2 ............................................................................................................ 12 3.2.3 Sample Project # 3 ............................................................................................................ 14 3.2.4 Sample Project # 4 ............................................................................................................ 16 3.2.5 Sample Project # 5 ............................................................................................................ 20 4 SCOPE OF SERVICES – TECHNICAL APPROACH ................................................................................... 26 4.1 Phase 1: Project Management .................................................................................................... 26 4.2 Phase 2: Automated Data Collection .......................................................................................... 27 4.3 Phase 3: Data Processing ............................................................................................................ 31 4.3.1 Distress Data Analysis ....................................................................................................... 31 4.3.2 Upload to Cartegraph and PCI Calculation ....................................................................... 34 4.3.3 IRI Data Analysis ................................................................................................................ 35 4.3.4 QC/QA Program ................................................................................................................ 36 4.4 Phase 4: Pavement Management Services ................................................................................. 37 4.5 Phase 5: Final Pavement Management Report .......................................................................... 38 4.6 Phase 6: Training ......................................................................................................................... 38 4.7 Phase 7: Asset Inventory ............................................................................................................. 39 4.8 Additional Services ...................................................................................................................... 43 Page 84 of 159 Page iii 4.8.1 Falling Weight Deflectometer ........................................................................................... 44 4.8.2 FWD Data Analysis ............................................................................................................ 45 4.8.3 Pavement Surface Friction Characteristics Testing........................................................... 45 5 PRICING .............................................................................................................................................. 46 6 KEY TEAM MEMBER RESUMES ........................................................................................................... 48 7 REFERENCES ....................................................................................................................................... 70 7.1.1 References within the Last Two Years .............................................................................. 70 7.1.2 References from 2-5 Years ................................................................................................ 71 Page 85 of 159 Page 1 of 73 1 PROJECT UNDERSTANDING Dynatest understands that the City of Georgetown wishes to conduct a pavement condition assessment of their paved roadway network, update their Cartegraph database, and perform budget analyses for pavement repairs and long-term planning for managing their pavement network. The City of Georgetown’s road network consists of approximately 330 centerline miles of roadway, or approximately 360 test miles to be surveyed as part of this pavement condition assessment. The City of Georgetown had previously performed automated pavement condition surveys in 2005, 2008, 2011, and 2014 utilizing another consultant. Dynatest’s project manager, Reuben Williams worked on each of these previous surveys for the prior consultant. The scope of this project includes: 1) Pre-analysis of historic pavement assessment data (part of project management phase) 2) Collection of photographs and sensor data of the Georgetown pavement surface and ROW a. Downward Pavement images b. ROW images c. Pavement ride and rutting measurements 3) Provide pavement condition indices per City of Georgetown requirements a. Pavement Condition Index (PCI) b. International Roughness Index (IRI) 4) Software and data integration 5) Pavement management reporting services 6) Training on pavement and asset management procedures and software Dynatest is confident that we can exceed all the requirements described above. Our qualifications and proposed approach for this project is described in the following sections of this document. 2 PROJECT STAFFING Dynatest has provided pavement consulting engineering services and pavement testing and evaluation products to the global community since 1978. We are an established company with an excellent reputation in the industry. We pride ourselves on our unique combination of in-house analytical expertise and practical, in-the-field capabilities that enable us to successfully perform many different types of projects and provide practical solutions for a wide array of clients. 2.1 Project Manager Our project manager, Mr. Reuben Williams has over 13 years’ experience with pavement management implementation projects and over 10 years’ experience in management of pavement management implementation projects. A partial listing of projects managed in the last five years while at a prior firm are listed below.  City of San Antonio Pavement Management Services, San Antonio, Texas (2009-2012): As project manager, Mr. Williams led the inspection of approximately 4,000 centerline miles (4,800 Page 86 of 159 Page 2 of 73 test miles) of city streets. Roadside assets were inventoried that included sidewalks, curb ramps, drop inlets, signs, manholes, and water valves. Along with two subconsultants, which included PinPoint Geotech, Inc., ADA compliance inspections were performed on over 57,000 curb ramps on city streets. The pavement condition information was uploaded to the Cartegraph pavement management system and budget analyses used for long-term planning were provided to the City. Geodatabases were provided for sidewalk, curb ramp, drop inlet, and sign inventory. This project consisted of a phased implementation over three years: o Condition Survey. The condition survey took place in 2010. Collection started in January of 2010 and completed around July 2010. Data processing continued through November when PCI scores were finalized. o Development of Rating Procedure. Prior to the 2010 condition survey, the City of San Antonio was using a legacy pavement management system that was a proprietary system developed by another consulting firm. This system used a Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) system that utilized a custom procedure for calculation condition scores. The City needed to decide whether to continue using the PCR system or to adapt the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) system (ASTM 6433). To perform a comparison of the two rating procedures, a 30-mile pilot study of condition scores were calculated prior to starting data processing on a production level. Not only were the overall indices compared (PCR vs. PCI), but the individual distresses and their impacts on the overall condition scores. After performing this study, the City decided to go with a modified PCI approach, making some minor adjustments for specific severity levels distresses on specific roadway functional classes. The sensitivity analysis was not only performed to determine whether to use the PCR or PCI approach, this also served as a quality control step in which a comprehensive field audit was performed to ensure that the raw distress data was accurate and also that City personnel were in agreement of the final PCI scores calculated. o PCI Calculation. The modified ASTM approach for calculating a PCI was utilized for this project. Once all raw data was in the office, Fugro engineering staff reviewed the data further to ensure quality prior to upload to the pavement management system. The City of San Antonio implementation was done using the Cartegraph pavement management system. o Pavement Management System Installation and Configuration. While some degree of configuration was performed during the PCI calculation phase of the project, additional configuration was performed to allow City personnel to perform budget analyses on their own. Legacy condition information was transferred to the new system. o Asset Inventory. From the right-of-way (ROW) images taken during the pavement condition survey. Road signs, sidewalks, curb ramps, drop inlets, manholes, water valve covers, and concrete collars were all inventoried. Sidewalks had termini information gathered (latitude and longitude coordinates) along each roadway. Signs, drop inlets, and curb ramps were also geolocated and some attribute information was obtained from the imagery. For the in-street assets (manholes, water valves, concrete collars), condition information was provided for each road segment. Each manhole, water valve, and collar was assessed for being flush, sunken, risen, or paved over relative to the road surface. This information is vital when repaving a roadway to determine and budget for grade adjustments on these in-road assets. An estimated mileage of the missing miles of sidewalks was also provided with input from City staff. o ADA Ramp Inspections. A special inspection of the curb ramps was performed to assess ADA compliance of each ramp maintained by the City. Along with PinPoint Geotech, Mr. Page 87 of 159 Page 3 of 73 Williams developed a software package for mobile GPS devices for ADA ramp inspections. Inspection criteria was defined by City personnel and programmed. Over 57,000 ramps were inspected for ADA compliance using this procedure. o Budget Analysis and Executive Summary. Mr. Williams performed a budget analysis to estimate network condition and funding needs over a 10-year period. The City’s funding levels, decision matrix, and budget allocation were all evaluated to optimize the City’s current budget, as well as project necessary funding for obtaining a target pavement condition level. Mr. Williams personally oversaw all budget analyses for this project and wrote the entire executive summary technical report with budget funding recommendations. o Increase in Funding. Based on the budget analysis executive summary written by Mr. Williams, the streets department was able to obtain several million additional dollars in funding to their annual budget. The report documented the current needs and projected future funding needs played a large role in the department obtaining more funding. o Training. Mr. Williams designed and gave a one-week training class on using the Cartegraph pavement management system as well as training on pavement management concepts to City of San Antonio personnel. o Current System. The City of San Antonio is still using the overall process that Mr. Williams implemented and configured to manage their pavement management system. Documentation of procedures and processes provided to the City has allowed them to continue to utilize the system on a daily basis and use it for their Capital and Maintenance Planning that they do each year.  City of McKinney Pavement Management Services, McKinney, Texas (2005, 2007, 2009, 2012, 2015): Mr. Williams has performed five pavement management projects for the City of McKinney, TX with a network size of approximately 600 centerline miles. The pavement condition information was uploaded to the Cartegraph pavement management system and budget analyses and a formal pavement management report with maintenance and rehabilitation recommendations was provided to the City. Mr. Williams worked on this project first as a graduate engineer, then project engineer (engineer of record), and finally as project manager on the past three updates. The final report for the latest round of data collection was under client review when Mr. Williams left his previous firm and was sealed by another engineer. Mr. Williams has directed all technical aspects of the McKinney projects over the years, including data collection, budget analyses, and reporting. Mr. Williams was the engineer of record who sealed the reports in 2009 and 2012 and managed the 2015 to 99% completion.  City of Tyler Pavement Management Services, Tyler, Texas (2012-2014): Mr. Williams served as project manager for the inspection of approximately 550 miles of city streets. The pavement condition information was uploaded to the MicroPAVER pavement management system and budget analyses and a formal pavement management report with maintenance and rehabilitation recommendations was provided to the City. The scope of this project was an initial implantation for the City of Tyler. As this was an initial inspection and implementation, a lot of effort was placed on inventory review from different data sources. Maintenance practices and unit costs currently used by the City of Tyler were reviewed to develop a decision tree that could be programmed into the MicroPAVER pavement management system. Budget levels were then input into the system and a final budget analysis was run to project network condition and needs for a 5-year forecast. Mr. Williams performed a training on the MicroPAVER software as well as pavement management concepts for City of Tyler personnel. Mr. Williams was the engineer of record and sealed all formal reports submitted to the City. Page 88 of 159 Page 4 of 73  City of Austin Pavement Data Collection for Pavement Management System Update, Austin, Texas (2010-2013): Mr. Williams served as project manager for pavement data collection and processing for two full survey cycles of 2,600 miles of roadway over roughly three years. Automated data collected included pavement images, right-of-way imagery, and roughness. Information was collected and pavement condition information was summarized and then submitted to the City in Esri’s Geodatabase format. Viewing software that displayed the right-of- way and pavement imagery as well as a summarization of pavement distress and roughness. This multi-year project encompassed one full network survey and then two half-network surveys for a total of two full coverages of the City’s entire network. Mr. Williams worked with technical staff to help design this custom viewing software for the City of Austin. No formal engineering report was required for this project.  City of Missouri City Sidewalk Inventory and Inspection (2013): Mr. Williams served as project manager and lead technical expert for sidewalk inspections along approximately 300 centerline miles of roadway for the City of Missouri City, TX. With PinPoint Geotech as a subcontractor, Mr. Williams led the technical development of a GPS handheld system for sidewalk inspections. Sidewalk defects were recorded in the field as well as sidewalk centerlines and photos of defects to aid in repair of sidewalks. Geotagged information on the precise location of all sidewalk failures, type of failure, and estimated repair cost were provided for the City’s entire network. The handheld data collection system allowed for inventory and location of sidewalks that were not adjacent to roadways or sidewalks that moved far off from the roadway in places, but still maintained by the City. A report summarizing field data collection, inventory, sidewalk attributes, and estimated repairs was provided to the City. This report did not require a professional engineer’s seal.  City of Haltom City Pavement Management Services, Haltom City, Texas (2012). Managed inspection of approximately 160 miles of city streets. The pavement condition information was uploaded to the Cartegraph pavement management system and budget analyses and a formal pavement management report with maintenance and rehabilitation recommendations was provided to the City. Asset inventory services were also provided to the City. Additionally, a CIP plan was developed through a subconsultant.  City of Missouri City Pavement Management Services, Missouri City, Texas (2012 -2013). Managed inspection of approximately 290 miles of city streets. The pavement condition information was uploaded to the Cartegraph pavement management system and a formal report documenting network conditions was provided to the City. No formal budget analysis was performed.  City of Irving Pavement Management Services, Irving, Texas (2015, managed to 80% completion), Managed inspection of approximately 544 centerline miles (1,200 test miles) of city streets. The pavement condition information will be uploaded to the MicroPAVER pavement management system and budget analyses and a formal pavement management report with maintenance and rehabilitation recommendations was provided to the City. The MicroPAVER software will be integrated with the Cityworks software that the City of Irving also utilizes. Budget optimization and pavement condition improvement analyses was performed to help develop long-term budgets for the City of Irving. In addition, based on the results of the pavement management implementation study, a CIP plan will be developed. Managed two subconsultants who are providing support on the Cityworks integration and CIP plan development. Pavement condition results were also be published to the web-viewing software. This project was still in progress when Mr. Williams changed firms. Project was approximately at 80% completion. Page 89 of 159 Page 5 of 73  City of Richardson Pavement Management Services, Richardson, Texas (2015, managed to 99% completion). Managed pavement data collection and processing of approximately 760 test miles of city streets. The pavement condition information was provided in spreadsheet and GIS format as well as in a web-viewing software. A report summarizing network condition is was provided. No budget analysis was performed for this project. This project was still in progress when Mr. Williams changed firms. Project was approximately at 99% completion.  City of San Angelo Pavement Management Services, San Angelo, Texas (2015 managed to 99% completion). Project consisted of approximately 550 centerline miles (675 test miles) of city streets. The pavement condition information will be uploaded to the Cartegraph pavement management system and budget analyses and a formal pavement management report with maintenance and rehabilitation recommendations was provided to the City. Budget optimization and pavement condition improvement analyses will be performed to help develop long-term budgets for the City of San Angelo. In addition, based on the results of the pavement management implementation study, a CIP plan will be developed. One subconsultant who is providing support on the CIP plan development. Pavement condition results will also be published the web viewing software. This project was still in progress when Mr. Williams changed firms. Reuben presented the results of the study to City Council. This project was still in progress when Mr. Williams changed firms. Project was approximately at 99% completion.  City of Coppell Pavement Management Services and Sidewalk Inventory (2011). Mr. Williams served as project manager for the inspection of approximately 240 test miles of city streets. The pavement condition information was uploaded to the MicroPAVER pavement management system and budget analyses and a formal pavement management report with maintenance and rehabilitation recommendations was provided to the City. A work listing for every street in the City was provided with estimated quantities and costs for crack and joint sealing, slab repair, patching, and other recommended repairs. Network level budget analysis and PCI scores were also provided over a five-year projection. Identification of sidewalks and curb and gutter locations were also provided to the City. MicroPAVER training was provided to City personnel at the end of the project as well as a formal engineering report sealed by Mr. Williams. 2.2 Project Team 2.2.1 Senior Engineers Salil Gokhale, P.E., is based in Austin, TX and will serve as an engineering support ant technical advisor for all activities of the project. Mr. Gokhale is a senior engineer at Dynatest. Mr. Gokhale has extensive experience in pavement engineering and pavement management including: Municipality of Anchorage, AK; Province of Yukon (Canada); Cook County, IL; City of Frisco, TX; City of Wichita Falls, TX; Matanuska-Susitna Borough; AK; City of Hamilton, OH; Lee County, FL; Prince George’s County, MD; network level asset management for the Illinois State Highway Toll Authority; and several airport pavement management programs. Mr. Gokhale has over 14 years of experience in the pavement engineering field and has published more than 15 peer reviewed papers. He currently serves as a member on two Transportation Research Board (TRB) committees. Page 90 of 159 Page 6 of 73 2.2.2 Project Engineers Omar Elbagalati,PhD, E.I.T., will provide support for the pavement condition survey as well as support for the budget analysis and work plan recommendations tasks on this project. Dr. Elbagalati will also assist in tasks on an as needed basis. Dr. Elbagalati has been involved in several pavement testing, analysis and management projects. He has conducted pavement evaluations involving manual and automated pavement condition surveys, and he has implemented pavement management systems for several airports and cities. Sadaf Khosravifar, Ph.D., will provide support for the pavement condition survey as well as support for the budget analysis and work plan recommendations tasks on this project. Dr. Khosravifar will also assist in tasks on an as needed basis. Dr. Khosravifar has been involved in several pavement testing, analysis and management projects. She has conducted pavement evaluations involving manual and automated pavement condition surveys, and pavement design and analysis, and non-destructive structural testing with FWD and LWD. Dr. Khosravifar served as pavement engineering course instructor at University of Maryland—College Park prior to joining Dynatest. In addition, she has published more than 15 peer-reviewed technical papers and reports on pavement structural behavior and performance and is an active member on several pavement engineering technical committees. Vincent Mwumvaneza, E.I.T., will provide support for the pavement condition survey as well as support for the budget analysis and work plan recommendations tasks on this project. Mr. Mwumvaneza will also assist in tasks on an as needed basis. Mr. Mwumvaneza has been involved in several pavement testing, analysis and management projects. He has conducted pavement evaluations involving manual and automated pavement condition surveys, and he has implemented pavement management systems for airports, cities and counties. 2.2.3 Data Processing Sara Alzate, will specifically provide support for data processing activities. This will include supervising and performing quality control checks on distress rating, segmentation, and database population. Ms. Alzate will coordinate with Craig Cox on data processing and automating quality control checks on processed data. 2.2.4 Data Upload and Quality Control Craig Cox, will be primarily tasked with upload of pavement condition data into the database and GIS deliverables for the agencies. Mr. Cox has worked with a variety of pavement management systems, including MicroPAVER, Cartegraph, Lucity, as well as managed the TxDOT pavement management system while working for TxDOT. Mr. Cox is also a process improvement specialist and will assist Ms. Alzate with the data processing tasks as well as Mr. Stampley for automating quality control check on the data. Mr. Cox has worked on automated condition survey data uploads for several Texas agencies in addition to TxDOT: San Angelo, Kerrville, Irving, Richardson, McKinney, Tyler, and Austin. Page 91 of 159 Page 7 of 73 2.2.5 Key Technical Staff Gary Wright, will directly support the project manager by managing the field crews and scheduling equipment. Mr. Wright has performed pavement data collection for over 23 years, including automated surveys for City of Austin, City of Coppell, City of McKinney, and several other Texas agencies. Mr. Wright has designed, maintained, and troubleshot automated condition assessment equipment for over 20 years and will also provide support for keeping electronic components of the data collection vehicles repaired if any issues arise during data collection. Robin Belt, will support field data collection by managing fleet support to keep vehicles in running condition as well as assisting with fixing mechanical issues that may come up during data collection. Mr. Belt will also be responsible, for conducting and managing the field aspects of any structural testing and coring that an agency may request. Mr. Belt has performed, managed field work of, and maintained equipment associated to performing structural evaluation of pavements for over 26 years, including over 4,000 miles for Oklahoma Department of Transportation and scores of other state and local agency projects. 2.2.6 Lead Equipment Operators and PCI Inspectors Dynatest has over twenty (20) trained and experienced equipment operators and pavement condition inspectors. We have tentatively assigned the following lead individuals to this project, but we may deploy several more or replace personnel if needed. Donald Noah recently served as the PCI Team Leader for the Prince George’s County, Maryland, MicroPAVER implementation and PCI inspection project. He has also recently served as the PCI Team Leader for the Chattanooga Metropolitan Airport (CHA) MicroPAVER update and PCI inspection. In addition, he has recently served as a PCI inspector on several US Army Corps of Engineers PCI inspection projects. Mr. Noah has more than 24 years of experience with pavement through the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). Prior to retiring from TxDOT, Mr. Noah served as the user coordinator for the Texas roadway reference marker system. He also served – and continues to serve – as a pavement rater for the TxDOT Pavement Management Information System (PMIS). Tobin Homuth recently served as Lead Technician for several projects. In this role, he was responsible for the operation of Automated Distress Collection (MFV) equipment, as well as the operation of a Dynatest Friction trailer, for the collection of friction data, for both LBJ Freeway and North Tarrant Expressway in the Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas area. Other projects Mr. Holmuth has served on include, MFV operator for data collection in the State of Illinois, and the City of Minneapolis, Minnesota. Mr. Tobin has also served as lead Friction operator for project in Truckee, California, and Abilene, Texas. Mr. Holmuth has more than 12 years’ prior experience through the Texas Department of Transportation. Prior to retiring from TxDOT, Mr. Holmouth served as a PMIS Coordinator from 1995 to 2000 and operated a Falling Weight Defelctometer and a Friction trailer through the state of Texas. 2.2.7 Resumes Resumes for select project team members are included in a separate resume section of proposal. Page 92 of 159 Page 8 of 73 3 EXPERIENCE 3.1 Company Information and History Dynatest has provided pavement consulting engineering services and pavement testing and evaluation products to the global community since 1978. We are an established company with an excellent reputation in the industry. We pride ourselves on our unique combination of in-house analytical expertise and practical, in-the-field capabilities that enable us to successfully perform many different types of projects and provide practical solutions for a wide array of clients. For almost 40 years, Dynatest has provided pavement management solutions to State, County and local agencies as well as to the Department of Defense (DoD). Our most common pavement engineering and consulting services include:  Pavement management system implementations and updates  Pavement condition evaluations - manual and automated  On-call pavement engineering, evaluation, and management support  Pavement nondestructive structural testing and analysis  Pavement friction and roughness testing  Customized analysis and reporting for engineering projects  Training clients in pavement engineering and management principles and practices, deflection analysis techniques, operation of equipment, and use of analytical software  Development of project level pavement analysis software applications including ELMOD 6, FEM/LET/MET, Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) and PCN  Research and operations support for long-term accelerated pavement testing (APT) projects including complete system instrumentation and monitoring Dynatest is the world’s largest manufacturer of pavement testing and evaluation equipment. We manufacture Falling Weight Deflectometers (F-FWD and HWD), Light Weight Deflectometers (LWD), Road Surface Profilers (RSP), Highway and Runway and Friction Testers (PFT and H/RFT), Pavement Condition Survey Systems (PCSS), and Heavy Vehicle Simulators (HVS). Dynatest North America Inc. (Dynatest) is the U.S. subsidiary of Dynatest International A/S. Dynatest is headquartered in Alpharetta, Georgia, and is registered as a Georgia corporation. Dynatest was incorporated on September 8, 1978. Our primary offices are located at: Corporate Headquarters Dynatest North America, Inc. 11415 Old Roswell Road, Suite 100 Alpharetta, GA 30009 Tel: +1 904.964.3777 Fax: +1 904.964.3749 Office Responsible for this Project Dynatest North America, Inc. 2217 West Braker Lane Austin, TX 78758 Tel: +1 512.521.5008 x215 Contact Email: rwilliams@dynatest.com Page 93 of 159 Page 9 of 73 Dynatest can provide virtually all types of pavement testing and engineering services, including manual and automated pavement inspections, non-destructive structural testing, friction testing and pavement profile measurements. Dynatest currently owns and operates the following equipment: Dynatest In-House Equipment Model Quantity Pavement Condition Survey System (PCSS) LCMS 2 Pavement Condition Survey System (PCSS) LRIS 2 Heavy Weight Deflectometer (HWD) 8082 2 Fast Falling Weight Deflectometer (F-FWD) 8012 1 Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) 8002 1 Road Surface Profilometer Mark III 5051-3 3 Road Surface Profilometer Mark IV 5051-4 2 Locked Wheel Friction Tester 1295 1 Runway Friction Tester 6875 1 Highway Friction Tester 6850 1 Light Weight Deflectometer 3031 1 Dynatest’s Texas office, is located in Austin, Texas. All project related services including local support and pavement condition surveying tasks will be conducted through this office. Dynatest has more than twenty (20) pavement condition inspectors and more than sixty (60) total employees located in the United States. Our project staff and inspectors have worked for several government agencies, and we always successfully accomplish a project regardless of the location. Furthermore, we have significant pavement management and engineering expertise in all seven of our United States offices located in Starke, Florida; Alpharetta, Georgia; Westland, Michigan; Chicago, Illinois; Lemoyne, Pennsylvania; Austin, Texas, and Ventura, California. Page 94 of 159 Page 10 of 73 3.2 Sample Projects Below are four (4) example projects that go through specific project details. Being in business for over 40 years, Dynatest has provided services similar to this for hundreds of projects/clients. In fact, more than 80 percent of our clients return to us for these exact services. Below is a brief representation of similar projects to the scope of services requested by the City of Tyler. References for several projects are provided after the resume section of this proposal. 3.2.1 Sample Project # 1 Dynatest collected pavement distress, roughness, rut, faulting, curvature, grade and GPS data on approximately 1,500 lane miles on non-State highway segments throughout Southern California. The data was used for entry into the Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS), which is a federally mandated inventory system and planning tool, designed to assess the nation’s highway system. HPMS is used as a management tool by State and Federal governments and local agencies to analyze the system's condition and performance. Dynatest reported the data for tenth of a mile interval. The project started in July 2013 and was successfully completed ahead of schedule in June 2014. ASTM E1703/1703M was used for rut measurements and ASTM E950 was used for IRI data collection. Distress data was collected in accordance to HPMS and LTPP protocols. Figure 1 shows the distress data that were identified in a table and on downward images. In addition, the right-of-way image for that specific frame is shown. The list of distresses to be collected is customizable according to the required standard. Figure 2 shows the section name, type of distress, severity, quantity, location of the distresses, and their GPS coordinates in Excel format. Figure 3 shows the IRI and Rut data that is collected simultaneously with the distress data according to the above ASTM standards. The data can also be viewed in table format. In addition, events and right-of- way images can be viewed by clicking on any location. Page 95 of 159 Page 11 of 73 Figure 1. CA HPMS Sample Distress Data and Images Figure 2. Sample Output Distress Data Distresses, 166.RSP (0.0ft to 21682.0ft) Unit : Feet PID DistressType MPID Severity MaxSeve rityLevel Width (ft)Length (ft)Area (ft^2) Location_St ation (ft)From (ft)To (ft)Latitude Longitude Altitude SB::BASELINE_AVE::166 Transverse Cracking_HPMS 53 1 1 0 6.187541 0 9.629 9.276 9.982 34.63554764 -120.0802155 171.3999939 SB::BASELINE_AVE::166 Transverse Cracking_HPMS 53 1 1 0 6.197022 0 16.673 15.615 17.732 34.63554764 -120.0802155 171.3999939 SB::BASELINE_AVE::166 Fatigue Cracking_HPMS 1 1 1 0 4.164096 0 26.524 24.442 28.606 34.63554764 -120.0801468 171.3999939 SB::BASELINE_AVE::166 Fatigue Cracking_HPMS 1 1 1 0 10.584152 0 38.838 38.832 38.844 34.63554764 -120.0801468 171.3999939 SB::BASELINE_AVE::166 Transverse Cracking_HPMS 53 1 1 0 10.670717 0 55.274 54.993 55.555 34.63554764 -120.0800781 171.3999939 SB::BASELINE_AVE::166 Transverse Cracking_HPMS 53 1 1 0 5.296947 0 62.835 62.482 63.188 34.63554764 -120.0800171 171.3999939 SB::BASELINE_AVE::166 Transverse Cracking_HPMS 53 1 1 0 11.487457 0 68.611 68.159 69.063 34.63554764 -120.0800171 171.3999939 SB::BASELINE_AVE::166 Transverse Cracking_HPMS 53 1 1 0 11.979272 0 88.854 88.468 89.239 34.63554764 -120.0799484 171.3999939 SB::BASELINE_AVE::166 Transverse Cracking_HPMS 53 1 1 0 9.45429 0 109.06 108.51 109.61 34.63554764 -120.0798874 171.3999939 SB::BASELINE_AVE::166 Transverse Cracking_HPMS 53 1 1 0 8.162205 0 113.35 112.391 114.309 34.63554764 -120.0798874 171.3999939 SB::BASELINE_AVE::166 Transverse Cracking_HPMS 53 1 1 0 6.077374 0 119.539 119.185 119.893 34.63554764 -120.0798874 171.3999939 SB::BASELINE_AVE::166 Transverse Cracking_HPMS 53 1 1 0 4.73443 0 120.727 120.472 120.982 34.63554764 -120.0798187 171.3999939 SB::BASELINE_AVE::166 Transverse Cracking_HPMS 53 1 1 0 10.553551 0 126.763 126.309 127.216 34.63554764 -120.0798187 171.3999939 SB::BASELINE_AVE::166 Transverse Cracking_HPMS 53 1 1 0 3.074012 0 128.279 128.007 128.551 34.63554764 -120.0798187 171.3999939 SB::BASELINE_AVE::166 Transverse Cracking_HPMS 53 1 1 0 3.098397 0 133.859 133.732 133.986 34.63554764 -120.0798187 171.3999939 SB::BASELINE_AVE::166 Transverse Cracking_HPMS 53 1 1 0 5.931914 0 139.605 139.255 139.955 34.63554764 -120.0798187 171.3999939 SB::BASELINE_AVE::166 Transverse Cracking_HPMS 53 1 1 0 3.565817 0 140.347 140.124 140.57 34.63554764 -120.0797501 171.3999939 SB::BASELINE_AVE::166 Transverse Cracking_HPMS 53 1 1 0 6.798934 0 145.79 145.414 146.167 34.63554764 -120.0797501 171.3999939 SB::BASELINE_AVE::166 Transverse Cracking_HPMS 53 1 1 0 10.589854 0 155.681 155.149 156.213 34.63554764 -120.0797501 171.3999939 SB::BASELINE_AVE::166 Transverse Cracking_HPMS 53 1 1 0 10.310632 0 171.328 171.238 171.418 34.63554764 -120.079689 171.3999939 SB::BASELINE_AVE::166 Transverse Cracking_HPMS 53 1 1 0 10.614546 0 188.696 188.51 188.881 34.63554764 -120.0796204 171.3999939 SB::BASELINE_AVE::166 Transverse Cracking_HPMS 53 1 1 0 11.380529 0 212.713 212.097 213.329 34.63554764 -120.0795517 171.3999939 SB::BASELINE_AVE::166 Fatigue Cracking_HPMS 1 1 1 0 3.325518 0 218.1 216.438 219.763 34.63554764 -120.0795517 171.3999939 SB::BASELINE_AVE::166 Transverse Cracking_HPMS 53 1 1 0 10.6088 0 230.909 230.843 230.975 34.63554764 -120.079483 171.3999939 SB::BASELINE_AVE::166 Transverse Cracking_HPMS 53 1 1 0 10.497882 0 250.501 249.849 251.153 34.63554764 -120.079422 171.3000031 SB::BASELINE_AVE::166 Fatigue Cracking_HPMS 1 1 1 0 4.030355 0 256.684 254.669 258.699 34.63554764 -120.079422 171.3000031 SB::BASELINE_AVE::166 Transverse Cracking_HPMS 53 1 1 0 7.394775 0 266.668 266.549 266.788 34.63554764 -120.0793533 171.3000031 SB::BASELINE_AVE::166 Transverse Cracking_HPMS 53 1 1 0 7.894977 0 275.542 275.458 275.626 34.63554764 -120.0793533 171.3000031 SB::BASELINE_AVE::166 Transverse Cracking_HPMS 53 1 1 0 6.543112 0 289.581 289.515 289.646 34.63554764 -120.0792847 171.1999969 SB::BASELINE_AVE::166 Transverse Cracking_HPMS 53 1 1 0 11.013564 0 301.819 301.574 302.065 34.63554382 -120.0792236 171.1000061 SB::BASELINE_AVE::166 Transverse Cracking_HPMS 53 1 1 0 6.560031 0 324.517 324.373 324.66 34.63554382 -120.079155 171.1000061 SB::BASELINE_AVE::166 Transverse Cracking_HPMS 53 1 1 0 6.292564 0 332.177 332.099 332.254 34.63554382 -120.079155 171.1000061 SB::BASELINE_AVE::166 Transverse Cracking_HPMS 53 1 1 0 11.118817 0 357.545 356.786 358.304 34.63554382 -120.0790863 171 Page 96 of 159 Page 12 of 73 Figure 3. Sample IRI, Rut Data, and Events and Images 3.2.2 Sample Project # 2 Dynatest – in association with Johnson, Mirmiran & Thompson (JMT) and Shahin and Associates – performed a MicroPAVER implementation for Prince George's County, Maryland. Dynatest created a MicroPAVER database for the County and worked with JMT to link the MicroPAVER database to the County's GIS system. Dynatest performed an automated PCI survey on 1,800 lane miles of roadway pavements and entered the collected data in the County's MicroPAVER database. PCI survey and pavement roughness and rutting evaluation were conducted following ASTM D6433-11, ASTM E 1703E/1703M-95, and ASTM E950/E950- 95. In addition, high definition right of way images and pavement geometrics data were also collected. Dynatest then worked with the County to develop a 'State of the Streets' report and a list of candidate projects for Federal stimulus funding. The benefits of implementing a pavement management system were immediate for the County as they were able to apply for and receive funding from State and Federal stimulus funds. This on-going contract was first conducted in 2008 and we are schedule to complete an additional round of data collection this year. Figure 4 shows an example of pavement distress rating coupled with a right of way image used to determine the pavement condition of the sample unit. Figure 5 shows the street ID, the inspection ID, length, distress type, quantity and severity coupled with the beginning and end station for each inspection sample. Page 97 of 159 Page 13 of 73 Figure 4. Prince George’s County Sample Distress Data and Images Figure 5. Sample Output Distress for George’s County Data in Excel Spreadsheet Page 98 of 159 Page 14 of 73 3.2.3 Sample Project # 3 Dynatest – in association with Woolpert – was awarded a contract by the Cook County Highway Department to provide pavement engineering and management services on approximately 550 centerline miles of County managed roads. In this heavy traffic, high speed, urban area, manual foot-on-ground surveys were not deemed safe and feasible, and therefore Cook County decided to proceed with a semi- automated survey option following ASTM D6433-11. Dynatest deployed one of its state-of-the-art Pavement Condition Survey Systems (PCSS) for this project, which was equipped with a laser line-scan pavement imaging system, a high definition Right-of-Way camera, inertial measurement unit (for highway geometrics) and a 7 point laser profiler for measurement of pavement roughness and rutting following ASTM E 1703E/1703M-95 and ASTM E950/E950-95. Dynatest successfully have been able to complete the requirements of this project since 2011. Two MicroPAVER training sessions were conducted for the County engineering personnel. The scope of this project included the following: 1. Create an inventory of the County's streets 2. Conduct pavement distress surveys using automated methods 3. Customize and implement a pavement management system 4. Integrate results into the County's GIS system 5. Conduct non-destructive deflection testing (FWD testing) on select roadways to determine structural properties 6. Develop comprehensive resurface and reconstruction programs 7. Provide on-site pavement management training 8. Prepare a “State of the Streets” report. Page 99 of 159 Page 15 of 73 Figure 6 shows an example of pavement condition distress rating according to ASTM D6433-11. In addition, Figure 7 shows the roadway name, beginning and end station, distress type and quantity, rut depth severity and quantity, and average IRI. Figure 6. Cook’s County Sample Distress Data and Images Figure 7. Sample Output Distress for Cook’s County Data in Excel Spreadsheet Page 100 of 159 Page 16 of 73 3.2.4 Sample Project # 4 In 2012, Dynatest – in collaboration with Woolpert Inc., V.S. Engineering, and D.B. Engineering – provided pavement and asset management services the City of Indianapolis, Indiana. Woolpert was contracted by the Indianapolis Department of Public Works (DPW) to develop a documented sign replacement program (DSRP) by creating a model and physical database repository for the sign inventory data. This project involved driving approximately 3,200 miles of the City of Indianapolis’ street centerlines and collecting data with our in-house Lynx Mobile Mapping System (MMS) to support the citywide sign inventory. Mobile Lidar and still-frame digital photographs were used to extract signs and sign information – to include their respective location – as per MUTCD specifications. The imagery acquired during the MMS acquisition, along with Lidar point cloud data, was ingested into a proprietary (semi- automated) sign recognition tool to facilitate processing and evaluation. An internet-based visual verification and manual correction tool was also developed and used to complete the inventory project. In addition to the sign inventory, a visual curb and sidewalk assessment was performed. Using the quality control (QC) viewer (a web-based tool that allowed manually checking of each sign to determine if it was identified and if all attribute information was collected), Woolpert’s QC team reviewed curb and sidewalk information from the imagery collected to perform an evaluation of various distresses to provide the City the opportunity to assign each asset a condition rating on a predetermined point scale. In concert with the City, data model development hinged on the review of the current structure of the GIS and how and where the newly acquired data will be stored. Throughout the duration of this project, Woolpert conducted monthly status review meetings with the DPW project team to review project status on deliverables and schedule. Data Model Development. Using the documentation acquired during the data design workshops, Woolpert created a database schema in Microsoft Visio that diagrams the structure of the tables and attributes contained within the GIS layers. Using the created and approved schema, Woolpert created a database (GIS layers) within the City’s system. Application Development. The software developed automatically extracted features from the data that included:  Positional Coordinates within ±0.25’  Size (per DPW standards)  Orientation (cardinal direction)  Position (overhead, center, left or right of road centerline)  Date and time of capture  Unique sign identifier (per DPW standards)*  MUTCD sign type Page 101 of 159 Page 17 of 73  Mounting type (per DPW standards)*  Sign photo  Condition (per DPW standards)* * Some of these features required manual input. MMS Survey. Woolpert conducted an asset management data collection survey (accuracy 0.5’) for ±3,200 miles of the City’s street centerlines in support of this citywide sign inventory project. Acquisition took place without interference to traffic, at posted speeds, requiring no lane closures. The project was controlled using a VRS network, allowing Woolpert’s MMS crew to maximize their data collection window. Acquisition was segmented into manageable sections based on an average daily collection rate. All collected mobile Lidar was matched, classified (ground/non ground), and processed to ground with all imagery appropriately geo-referenced. Acquired data was processed based on the POS data and VRS network. Each drive path was color-coded based on the integrity of the POS solution. Areas where positional integrity came into question (ie: urban canyons, areas of poor GPS) were highlighted for review and post control. A benefit of using MMS technology for this sign inventory was the amount/density of data acquired and Woolpert’s ability to produce intensity images. These “chips” of data resemble vertical black-and-white images and were used for feature identification and post control, as needed. Woolpert’s processing team was careful to look for areas where the POS solution was suspect. If/where encountered, the processing team “chipped” out intersections in these areas and provided them to field crews to establish GPS information on a photo identifiable point within the image “chip”. This information was subsequently returned to the processing team for incorporation into the final positional solution. As segments were collected, they were transferred nightly to the processing team to validate and prepare for semi-automated sign extraction. “Intelligent processing tools” were applied to minimize processing time and incorporate pre-planning by use of existing GIS data to isolate potential sign locations and the use of proprietary algorithms to exclude areas where sign information was unlikely. After QC and approval of the final accuracy solution, the tile data was moved to a cloud based processing server for Lidar and image processing. Working in a grid based environment keeps the dataset manageable and uniform in size, thus limiting errors. The images collected during acquisition are tied back to corrected MMS trajectories as part of this process. This is unique to the Woolpert workflow and is vital to the semi-automated sign extraction phase of this project. These spatially corrected “street view” style images were provided as part of the project deliverables, linked and viewable in Google Earth. Dynatest assisted Woolpert in deploying a Pavement Condition Survey System (PCSS) to collect high resolution pavement imagery and ride quality data for ±2,200 miles of the City’s res idential streets. Dynatest’s PCSS on this project was outfitted with a state-of-the-art Laser Road Imaging System (LRIS) system. The LRIS collection consisted of two linescan cameras that captured continuous, high-resolution pavement images of the pavement surface. Dynatest’s scope of work included management and execution of the PAVER implementation and Pavement Condition Index (PCI) survey. Tasks included: 1. Review of the City’s streets inventory. 2. Migrate data from City’s existing InfraPAVE pavement management system to PAVER. Page 102 of 159 Page 18 of 73 3. Conduct pavement distress surveys using semi-automated methods on more than 2,200 miles including arterial roadways and residential streets following ASTM D6433-11. 4. Conduct pavement profile measurements (including providing IRI values and rut depths in accordance with ASTM E 1703E/1703M-95 and ASTM E950/E950-95) on the City’s arterial and primary roadways on more than 1,000 miles. 5. Integrate results into the City's GIS system. 6. Provide on-site pavement management training. All tasks of this project were successfully completed in December 2013. A PAVER training course was conducted for the City by Dynatest in April 2014. Figure 8 shows an example of front facing and downward image to identify pavement condition distress in according with ASTM D6433-11. In addition, Figure 9 shows the network ID, branch ID, section ID, branch use, rank, begging and end station, date of data collected, distress type, quantity, severity and section’s PCI. Figure 8. City of Indianapolis Sample Distress Data and Images Page 103 of 159 Page 19 of 73 Figure 9. Sample Output Distress for City of Indianapolis Data in MicroPAVER Page 104 of 159 Page 20 of 73 3.2.5 Sample Project # 5 To demonstrate our complete understanding of this project and its deliverables, the following example shows data collected on 43rd Avenue in the City of Bismarck, North Dakota. Figure 10. Location of 43rd Avenue in Bismarck, North Dakota Figure 11 shows the entire road section segmented in 100 ft. segments. Figure 11. 43rd Avenue Segmented in 100 ft. Segments. Labels show segment lengths in ft. Page 105 of 159 Page 21 of 73 Figure 12 shows the road segments (with unique identifiers), as well as the location of the GPS data points collected with our imaging van. We typically store GPS data at 10 ft. intervals. Figure 12. Location of Road Survey. Sample ROW images are shown in Figure 13. (a) at Station 40 (b) at Station 160 Figure 13. Sample ROW Images. Labels show unique segment IDs Green triangles show GPS locations collected with Dynatest PCSS Page 106 of 159 Page 22 of 73 As described in a previous section, the pavement distresses were identified and classified using the 2 step process. Some examples are shown in Figure 14 below. (a) Longitudinal and Transverse Cracking, Low Severity (b) Weathering, Low Severity Figure 14. Sample Distress Identification and Classification. Page 107 of 159 Page 23 of 73 The distress data was then exported in XML format and imported into a pavement management database. The individual distresses, severities and quantities are shown in Figure 15. Figure 15 Distresses Imported into PAVER Table 1 shows the distresses, quantities, deduct scores and final PCI values for each 100 ft. segment. The GPS coordinates of the mid-point of each segment are also shown in this table. Table 1. PCI Deduct Values and PCI Scores. Section Sample Size Latitude Longitude Distress Code Description Severity Distress Quantity PCI Deduct PCI 43RD_AV:105 1,344 46.852425 -100.751816 10 L&T cracking Low 148 10.87 87 43RD_AV:105 1,344 46.852425 -100.751816 20 Weathering Low 2,517 5.20 87 43RD_AV:104 1,344 46.852425 -100.752213 10 L&T cracking Low 60 5.95 92 43RD_AV:104 1,344 46.852425 -100.752213 20 Weathering Low 2,127 5.20 92 43RD_AV:103 1,344 46.852428 -100.752609 10 L&T cracking Low 38 3.62 93 43RD_AV:103 1,344 46.852428 -100.752609 20 Weathering Low 2,026 5.18 93 43RD_AV:102 1,344 46.852432 -100.753006 1 Alligator cracking Medium 335 50.72 47 43RD_AV:102 1,344 46.852432 -100.753006 20 Weathering Low 1,999 5.17 47 43RD_AV:101 1,344 46.852436 -100.753403 10 L&T cracking Low 19 1.42 93 43RD_AV:101 1,344 46.852436 -100.753403 20 Weathering Low 2,061 5.19 93 43RD_AV:100 1,344 46.852440 -100.753807 1 Alligator cracking Low 485 40.68 57 43RD_AV:100 1,344 46.852440 -100.753807 20 Weathering Low 2,049 5.18 57 Page 108 of 159 Page 24 of 73 The PCI scores for each segment are shown graphically in Figure 16 below. Figure 16. Graphical Display of PCI Scores on 43rd Avenue. IRI data was analyzed using FHWA’s ProVAL and the Dynatest Explorer Software. The results of the IRI analysis are shown in Figure 17 and Table 2. Figure 17. Results of IRI Analysis for the First 5 Segments on 43rd Avenue. Table 2. Average IRI Results Section Start Distance (ft) Stop Distance (ft) Length (ft) Left Wheel Path - IRI (in/mi) Right Wheel Path - IRI (in/mi) Average IRI (in/mi) 43RD_AV:105 0 100 100 218 221 219 43RD_AV:104 100 200 100 189 266 228 43RD_AV:103 200 300 100 254 273 264 43RD_AV:102 300 400 100 166 195 180 43RD_AV:101 400 500 100 164 188 176 Labels show unique segment IDs and PCI scores Page 109 of 159 Page 25 of 73 The final step in the analysis process is to link the distress details, deduct values, PCI scores, and IRI data to the segmented shapefile. An example result of this process is shown in Figure 18. The data is also presented in an Excel table as shown in Table 3. Figure 18. PCI and IRI Data Linked to Shapefile. Table 3. Excel File Containing PCI and IRI Data. *Field Names: D1: Distress 1, D1_Sev: Severity of Distress 1, D1_Qty: Quantity of Distress 1, D1_Deduct: Deduct value pertaining to Distress 1. NETWORKID BRANCHNAME BRANCHUSE BRANCHID SECTIONID FROM_TO_SURFACETYP RANK TRUEAREA LANES WIDTH LENGTH BISMARCK 43RD AVENUE ROADWAY 43RD_AV 101 POINTE LOOP 26TH STREET AC A 2399.9952 2 24 100 BISMARCK 43RD AVENUE ROADWAY 43RD_AV 102 POINTE LOOP 26TH STREET AC A 2399.9952 2 24 100 BISMARCK 43RD AVENUE ROADWAY 43RD_AV 103 POINTE LOOP 26TH STREET AC A 2399.9952 2 24 100 BISMARCK 43RD AVENUE ROADWAY 43RD_AV 104 POINTE LOOP 26TH STREET AC A 2399.9952 2 24 100 BISMARCK 43RD AVENUE ROADWAY 43RD_AV 105 POINTE LOOP 26TH STREET AC A 2836.403472 2 24 118 UniqueID PCI DATEPCI GPS_Lat GPS_Long L_IRI R_IRI Avg_IRI D1 D1_Sev D1_Qty D1_Deduct D2 D2_Sev D2_Qty D2_Deduct BISMARCK::43RD_AV::101 93 4/10/16 46.852436 -100.753403 164 188 176 10 Low 19 1.42 20 Low 2061 5.19 BISMARCK::43RD_AV::102 47 4/10/16 46.852432 -100.753006 166 195 180 1 Med 335 50.72 20 Low 1999 5.17 BISMARCK::43RD_AV::103 93 4/10/16 46.852428 -100.752609 254 273 264 10 Low 38 3.62 20 Low 2026 5.18 BISMARCK::43RD_AV::104 92 4/10/16 46.852425 -100.752213 189 266 228 10 Low 60 5.95 20 Low 2127 5.2 BISMARCK::43RD_AV::105 87 4/10/16 46.852424 -100.751816 218 221 219 10 Low 148 10.87 20 Low 2517 5.2 Page 110 of 159 Page 26 of 73 4 SCOPE OF SERVICES – TECHNICAL APPROACH Our overall proposed approach to successfully complete this project is shown in the graphic in Figure 19. Detailed description of our proposed tasks to accomplish the project objectives are detailed on the following pages. Figure 19. Proposed Project Approach 4.1 Phase 1: Project Management The Dynatest team will meet with City of Georgetown and KPA staff to initiate the project. This meeting will occur within the first three weeks of the notice to proceed, or at the earliest convenience of City of Georgetown and KPA staff. The objective of the meeting will be to discuss the scope of work, data collection protocol, quality control/quality assurance, project schedule, traffic control plan, jurisdictional contacts, reporting requirements, and other project-specific information. Up to ten (10) additional meetings will occur throughout the project at completion of major tasks and to review budget and work plan recommendations. Page 111 of 159 Page 27 of 73 An additional part of this phase that will take place prior to the data collection is an evaluation of the City’s current pavement management practices. This will require performing preliminary budget analyses, evaluating current maintenance and rehabilitation practices, evaluating pavement deterioration models, and presenting results to the Georgetown Transportation Advisory Board and City Council. The tasks of this preliminary analysis will involve the following:  Determine effect of alternate maintenance and rehabilitation strategies on the network PCI score  Update the pavement management database with completed projects over the last 4 years  Update the pavement performance curves  Evaluate the location of roadways based on soil classification  Present results to Georgetown Transportation Advisor Board and City Council The City of Georgetown and/or KPA Engineers will need provide the following information to facilitate the analyses to be performed by Dynatest:  Any reports that were delivered as part of the previous projects (already provided)  Cartegraph database (already provided)  Shape files of road centerlines (already provided)  Analysis constraints and goals to be programmed in the budget analysis (to be developed through course of project) Dynatest will utilize the Cartegraph software as well as other software packages as necessary in order to accomplish the scope of work as outlined above. Any other additional requests by the City of Georgetown may warrant an increase in the overall project fee. Once the budget analysis is complete and the funding levels have been determined, Dynatest will provide the following deliverables:  Results of the preliminary budget analysis with funding levels and PCI scores summarized in Microsoft Excel format  Charts and graphs of the results of the budget analysis in Microsoft PowerPoint format  Short memorandum with brief narrative describing the analyses performed (2-3 pages maximum) A full-scale report will not be provided unless the City of Georgetown requests additional reporting from Dynatest. 4.2 Phase 2: Automated Data Collection Dynatest has developed route-optimization programs that minimize data collection times in the field. For the City of Georgetown data collection, we will develop routing plans that provide the most efficient route for data collection purposes. Dynatest will discuss specific details and restrictions for data collection during the kick-off meeting to ensure safety, efficiency, and quality during data collection. Dynatest proposes to provide automated data collection using the Dynatest Pavement Condition Survey System (PCSS), equipped with either 2D Laser Road Imaging System (LRIS) or 3D Laser Crack Measurement System (LCMS). During data collection, this vehicle is driven at posted speed limits (up to 60 mph.) We do not anticipate any traffic control requirements. Our PCSS is equipped with appropriate flashing lights and Page 112 of 159 Page 28 of 73 sign markings for additional safety. Additionally, all vans used for collection are marked with the company name. The PCSS is equipped with the latest sensors and hardware required for accurate, high-quality pavement data collection, including:  INO’s Laser Road Imaging System and Laser Crack Measurement System: The imaging systems provides very high resolution pavement images. The system is configured to capture 4m (approximately 13 ft.) pavement width with 1mm resolution and can operate at speeds up to 60 mph.  Dynatest Model RSP-5051 Mark III High-Speed Laser Profiler: The Dynatest Road Surface Profiler (RSP) is equipped with 7 lasers and 2 accelerometers, and is a Class I (highest standard) profiler. In addition to pavement profile measurements, the RSP is capable of calculating IRI and rutting in real time.  High-definition Right of Way (ROW) cameras: The system includes two UniBrain cameras capable of capturing color images in 1920x1080 format or higher. Images are acquired and stored every 20 ft. and all images are geotagged.  Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) and GPS: The PCSS is equipped with an Applanix POS LV V5 inertial navigation system for recording sub-meter accuracy GPS coordinates. In addition, our system also captures pavement geometry including cross slope, radius of curvature and longitudinal grade. The Laser Imaging systems allows automated detection of pavement distresses including various types of cracks, raveling, edge drop-offs, potholes, macrotexture, and rutting. The system also automatically determines the presence of paint stripes which help in identifying the pavement lane. A picture of the Dynatest PCSS equipped with the LCMS system is shown in Figure 20 below. Sample pavement and ROW images are shown in Figures 5 and 6 respectively. The City of Georgetown has requested the video be collected over a 6-month period for the initial cycle. Additionally, City of Georgetown Pavement Management staff have requested to be allowed to join the selected vendor for collection during the first month. Dynatest will coordinate with City staff for inclusion during the first month of data collection. Page 113 of 159 Page 29 of 73 Figure 20. Dynatest PCSS with the 3D LCMS and Mark III Laser Profiler System. Page 114 of 159 Page 30 of 73 (a) 2D Intensity Image (b) 3D Range Image (c) Range Image with marked distresses Figure 21. Sample Pavement Images Figure 22. Sample Right of Way Image Page 115 of 159 Page 31 of 73 4.3 Phase 3: Data Processing Quality control and quality assurance are an integral part of our methodology. We incorporate Q C/QA measures in all aspects of data collection, verification, analyses and reporting. During data collection, all data streams are verified on a daily basis as part of a comprehensive QC/QA program to ensure that all required data elements are being collected. It also serves to ensure that no segment is left untested, unless for a reason beyond Dynatest’s control at the time of data collection (ex. road closures or construction activity). The following section describes our proposed analysis approach and our QC/QA program. 4.3.1 Distress Data Analysis Data acquired with the Laser Imaging system allows the automated detection/identification of various types of distresses including all types of cracking, rutting, raveling, potholes, edge drop-off, sealed cracks, lane markings, and macrotexture. However, it should be noted that for PCI calculation purposes, the ASTM D 6433 standard includes 20 distress types for both asphalt and concrete surface types. Due to the complexity of separating all distresses into the 20 distress types, we believe it is prudent to follow a two- step approach for distress rating, where Alternative 1 is the fully automated computer based crack type determination, and Alternative 2 is semi-automated rating process performed by an experienced pavement inspector. Dynatest will determine the most suitable approach to ensure quality results for the City of Georgetown. Rating Alternative 1: Fully automated. In alternative 1, all acquired data will be analyzed through Dynatest’s proprietary software, Dynatest Explorer/Dynatest Rating Module (DE/DRM). The DE/DRM software automatically classifies detected distresses, categorizes them by severity, and quantifies the results including location and extent. Distresses which can be automatically identified and classified are: Alligator cracking Block cracking Longitudinal cracks Transverse cracks Sealed cracks Edge cracks Potholes Curbs or edge drop-off Rutting Raveling Concrete joints An example of the automated distress identification and classification process is shown in Figure 23. This figure shows alligator cracking classified by our software. Page 116 of 159 Page 32 of 73 Figure 23. Automated Distress Analysis Process in Dynatest Explorer/Dynatest Rating Module. All collected data will be analyzed through our software using automated analysis tools to identify the locations of the above mentioned distress types. Rating Alternative 2: Manual Review of Distresses In the second option for the analysis process, experienced pavement inspectors will review the results of the fully automated process, and make changes or edits to the analyzed data. An example of this process is shown in Figure 24 below. In Figure 24 (a), the results of the automated analysis are shown. In Figure 24 (b), manual revisions to the auto-classified alligator cracking area are made by Dynatest staff. In this case, the area of alligator cracking was increased slightly to capture the full extent of the cracking. Page 117 of 159 Page 33 of 73 (a) Alligator Cracking Identified by Automated Process. (b) Alligator Cracking Area Modified by Dynatest Pavement Inspectors. Figure 24. Example of Manual Review of Distresses. Page 118 of 159 Page 34 of 73 4.3.2 Upload to Cartegraph and PCI Calculation After all pavement distress records have been analyzed, reviewed and passed our QC/QA measures, Dynatest will compile the data standard summary tables that can be formatted for any pavement management software. Cartegraph has several distinct advantages: 1. Cartegraph is widely used across the USA, and the databases/files can be easily shared. 2. PCI scores are calculated in Cartegraph, and conform to the guidelines described in ASTM D6433. 3. We can generate user-defined reports which include individual segment PCI values, distress quantities, and deduct scores for each distress. 4. The resulting report/data can be easily exported to Excel files. With the Cartegraph databases in hand, the City can use Cartegraph’s built-in analysis tools to perform several types of analyses including:  Reports, statistics, and graphs showing distribution of surface types and areas.  Reports, statistics, and graphs showing distribution of PCI values analyzed by surface type.  Develop pavement performance models.  Develop GIS based reports. For example, the PCI distribution for 160 arterial road sections is shown in Figure 25. Figure 25. Example PCI Distribution 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 0-10 11-25 26-40 41-55 56-70 71-85 86-100 Nu m b e r o f S e c t i o n s PCI Range Condition Distribution Graph (No. of Sections) Page 119 of 159 Page 35 of 73 4.3.3 IRI Data Analysis Pavement profile measurements will be analyzed to calculate the International Roughness Index (IRI) for both the Left and Right wheelpaths. An example of IRI results (averaged over 100 ft.) is shown in Figure 26 and Table 4 below. (Please note that an arbitrary threshold value of 150 in/mile is shown in the figure below.) Figure 26. Sample Chart Showing IRI Analysis for Each Wheelpath. Table 4. Example IRI Calculations (shown for 1,000 ft.) Start Distance (ft) Stop Distance (ft) Length (ft) Left Wheel Path - IRI (in/mi) Right Wheel Path - IRI (in/mi) Average IRI (in/mi) 0 100 100 218 221 219 100 200 100 189 266 228 200 300 100 254 273 264 300 400 100 166 195 180 400 500 100 164 188 176 500 600 100 168 178 173 600 700 100 325 284 305 700 800 100 174 158 166 800 900 100 259 252 256 900 1000 100 163 172 168 1000 1100 100 292 349 320 Page 120 of 159 Page 36 of 73 4.3.4 QC/QA Program As routine operating procedure, Dynatest technicians and engineers perform continuous QA/QC of all collected data. The objectives of the QC/QA are to: (1) ensure that the rating process follows a standard procedure, (2) minimize subjectivity and possible errors from raters, and (3) make sure the outcome is of excellent quality and is as repeatable as possible. The goal is to be able to provide systematic pavement rating when using any of the pavement inspectors (raters) in the company’s staff, independent of project location, size and pavement network condition. Quality Control (QC) is performed at the rater’s level. The main purpose is to ensure the entire rating process is conducted according to the guidelines established at the beginning of the project. The rating team manager is responsible for performing the QC. Quality assurance (QA) is performed at the engineering project level. The objectives are to validate the QC and to ensure the entire rating procedure provides accurate distress rating and PCI values. The acceptance of the QC results depends on the results of the QA evaluation. Samples for both QC and QA are randomly selected from the list of data files. Sample sizes are defined as 20% of project mileage for QC and 10% for QA. Additional samples may be added if deemed necessary, or for verification after an error has been found. Quality control of the pavement condition rating is performed daily. Each data file marked for QC is evaluated as soon as it has been completely rated. QA is performed on a weekly basis. At least one data file from each rater’s daily production must be QC’ed. During QC or QA process, the following items are evaluated: Completeness of data, distress categories, distress types, distress severities, and distress quantities. Any discrepancies are reported in a QC/QA log file. The log files are reviewed to check whether systemic errors are occurring. Systemic errors are critical and must be identified early and corrected with additional training and supervision. At the end of the process files marked for either QC or QA receive a classification: Acceptable (A), Review and Correct (RC), Re-rate (RR). If the results of QC and QA are comparable for a rater’s daily production, the QC is accepted and the results are reported. If not, QC is repeated. If the classification is acceptable, all files in the daily production are approved. If review and correct is required, QC and QA files need to be corrected and all remaining files need to be reviewed. Finally, if re-rate is required, the rater’s entire daily work needs to be re-rated. Given the natural subjectivity in the rating process, some deviation is expected. However, performing the QC/QA checks help eliminate incoherent rating or systematic bias that may affect the calculation of PCI values. A more comprehensive description of our QC/QA program shall be provided and discussed during the project kickoff meeting. Page 121 of 159 Page 37 of 73 4.4 Phase 4: Pavement Management Services Once all the condition data has been reviewed and accepted by the City of Georgetown, Dynatest will configure Cartegraph for the City and perform a series of analyses for the City of Georgetown. These tasks will include the following:  Update Decision Trees; if none exist, one will be developed (with City)  Evaluate Maintenance and Rehabilitation Strategies (with City)  Update Unit Costs (with City)  Update Pavement Performance Models based on results of condition survey; if non-existent, data collected this year will be used in conjunction with typical performance curves based on similar pavement types  Develop 5-year maintenance work plans (with City)  Identify and list potential candidate Capital Improvements Projects (based on PCI score)  Target PCI Analyses – determine target funding levels to reach target PCI. One target PCI analysis will be performed.  To perform these tasks, the project team requests as much of the following information as possible from the City before proceeding with the analysis: o City of Georgetown rehabilitation and/or repair standards o Unit pricing for work performed by City roadway crews and bid by contractors o Roadway construction plans of existing roadways o Materials used in the past and their outcome o Traffic control for field visits, if necessary Specifically, the following budget analyses to be performed within Cartegraph are included in the scope of work:  Network-Level 5-year analysis  5-year Unlimited Budget Analysis  5-year Do Nothing Analysis  5-year Deferred Maintenance Analysis  Target PCI Analysis (one target PCI)  Alternative High-Level Network Budget Scenarios (up to 5 scenarios) It is crucial to have the City’s involvement in this task. The goal of this phase is to produce a tool that allows the City to make more informed maintenance and rehabilitation decisions. Including information from the City is essential to implementing the pavement management program effectively. To develop a work plan that will help the City to get the most out of this project, it is anticipated that three review iterations will be required, each with an on-site meeting. Page 122 of 159 Page 38 of 73 4.5 Phase 5: Final Pavement Management Report This involves preparing a final report that will document all fieldwork, ride statistics, distress information, and the maintenance and rehabilitation recommendations. This report will include the following:  Summary of fieldwork  Summary of network condition o Will include summary based on City’s master thoroughfare network (arterials and collectors)  Summary of network-level repair recommendations for full network  Summary of network-level 5-year work plan and recommendations and listing of candidate roads for project cost estimating purposes  Recommended project groupings and with recommendation repair activities with estimated costs for City approved projects only  GIS maps summarizing roadway condition scores o GIS layer for average PCI o GIS layer for weighted condition index o GIS layer of 5-year plan  Spreadsheet and/or database summaries of network condition and recommended maintenance/repair activities A draft of the report will be prepared and provided to the City of Georgetown for review. Upon inclusion of City comments and acceptance of the report by the City, Dynatest will finalize the report. The purpose of this report will be to serve as initial strategies in support of the City’s 5-year maintenance and rehabilitation plan. Should more detailed project level plans need to be created, additional fees may be applicable and will be addressed with the City at that time. It should also be noted, that due to future circumstances, the plan presented to the City in this report is subject to change at the City’s discretion. Additional revisions of the plan provided or report will entail additional fees. 4.6 Phase 6: Training Dynatest will train and provide on-call assistance to agency Public Works and IT Department staff as needed on the use of data collected through the fully automated system. Dynatest has performed similar training for agencies in the past, and we have experienced instructors available to provide effective, practical, and engaging training courses. Furthermore, Dynatest has the Texas-based engineering and technical staff available to provide on-site and remote technical assistance when needed by the agency. Dynatest believes that training is a critical step necessary for the agency to take ownership of the pavement management system. We have found that a phased training approach, one which involves training at the beginning of a project and at the end of the project helps ensure the success of a project. Page 123 of 159 Page 39 of 73 Dynatest’s training courses consist of a combination of in-the-classroom, in-the-field, and hands-on software training. We customize our training to meet the needs of the agency. Typical training courses consist of the following modules and are presented within the context of the agency’s pavement management software system (Cartegraph): 1. Pavement management overview 2. Pavement inventory and data management a. Section/segment definition b. Functional classifications c. Section/segment priorities d. Section/segment additional attribution 3. Pavement historical work data management 4. Pavement condition surveys – in-the-field collection and in-the-office calculation a. Pavement Condition Index (PCI) method b. International Roughness Index (IRI) process c. Overall Condition Index (OCI) calculation 5. Pavement performance/prediction modeling a. Statistical methods b. Data filtering c. Model assessment d. Model assignment 6. Pavement condition analysis – predicting future pavement conditions using performance models 7. Pavement maintenance and rehabilitation (M&R) planning 8. Pavement project formulation 9. Reporting – GIS and tabular reports a. Inventory b. Condition c. Maintenance plans d. Rehabilitation plans 4.7 Phase 7: Asset Inventory Transcend Spatial Solutions (Transcend) will approach the project with the use of Mobile Mapping Systems (MMS). MMS offers many benefits for acquiring very accurate and precise geospatial data. One of the biggest benefits for mobile mapping is the drastic reduction in exposure of field staff to the hazards of a project site and any live traffic. MMS has the ability to collect topographic data that meets the accuracy needed for GIS, mapping, planning, and asset inventories. Transcend has been in the business of transportation GIS and mapping for many years, and we recognize the risk our people take every day working in and around city streets, roadways, railroads, interstates, and state highway systems. Because of this, Transcend invested in two Leica Peagasus: Two mobile LiDAR and mobile mapping systems. To ensure project success, the project team spends a lot of time and detail during the planning phase of the project. The success of a mobile mapping project is predominantly based on thorough planning. Initial planning is completed in the office through desktop software such as Google Maps, Street View, and TopoMission. Also, any existing files and/or maps that are shared digitally by the client are utilized as well. In addition, if warranted, the project manager for any given job will do a site visit prior to any deployment for additional information. Page 124 of 159 Page 40 of 73 Transcend has developed project control guidelines that are used on every project independently. The guidelines are flexible to avoid potentially dangerous placement sites while maintaining adequate spacing to allow for the analysis and statement of accuracy that each project requires. MMS acquisition will require the placement of a CORS or independent GPS base station within 15 miles of the project area. Keeping the baselines to minimum with regards to the base stations will ensure that the overall data quality and the integrity of the data remain optimal across the entire project area. Transcend’s Leica Pegasus: Two mobile mapping system will be used for the data acquisition. There are many technological advantages to the Leica Pegasus: Two mobile mapping system. Of particular interest for use in this project, the Leica Pegasus: Two mobile mapping system’s capabilities are:  360 Degree, panoramic imagery (street to sky) – The MMS incorporates 8 high resolution 5MP digital cameras to create true 360 degree imagery. Images are taken from street/pavement to a dome camera for the sky.  360 Degree LiDAR sensor – The MMS incorporates a high resolution 360 degree LiDAR scanner. This allows for highly accurate and precise laser scanning data throughout the project area in addition to the digital imagery.  Capture every street within the City – with speed and efficiency the system is mountable on any standard SUV giving Transcend the ability to access all public roads and streets.  Software as a Service or SaaS solution – Transcend offers many beneficial software and productivity tools that can be implemented and refined for each and every client.  Transcend is able to provide a web based client that includes measuring tools for use by the client. The tools are easy to use even by non-GIS, non-technical staff  The solution does not require technical expertise with GIS.  The imagery service integrates with both Esri ArcGIS desktop and ArcGIS Online solutions  The imagery service also allows for direct editing of geodatabase, feature services, and feature attributes within the imagery  The solution includes an API or widget to access imagery from internal web-based applications  The functionalities of the solution include: o Pan and zoom controls like Google Street View o Editable and accurate measuring tools for length, area and height of features o Calculate heights from observable street or sidewalk elevation in the image and reported in feet or meters o Editable text and report formatting The mobile mapping system consists of:  1 – Z+F 360 degree line scanners  8 – Leica 5MPx cameras  1 – Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU)  1 – Novatel GNSS/GLONASS receiver  1 or 2 - Novatel GNSS Antenna. A Second Antenna is utilized in certain applications  1 - DMI wheel mounted unit During data acquisition, a public CORS station or an independent GPS (GLONASS capable) base station will be set to log satellite data at a 1-second epoch, consistent with the log rate of the mobile GPS. The mobile GPS positioning is further supplemented by the IMU providing vehicle and sensor position and orientation Page 125 of 159 Page 41 of 73 updates at a rate of 200 times per second. The laser scanner will be set to a measurement rate 1.1 MHz combined. The MMS vehicle will travel at an average speed of 35 mph, but Transcend will vary the speed during acquisition to assist in reducing INS drift which tends to occur when constant direction, profile, and speed are maintained over a period of time. Transcend will also vary the speed of the vehicle based on the local posted speed limits throughout the city. Additionally, if a less than an optimal GPS environment is present, Transcend has adopted the best practice of conducting “mini static sessions.” If the project area incorporates a bad GPS environment, Transcend will plan short stops throughout the project in an open GPS sky. These stops are generally about two minutes in length and are conducted when the GPS is in a fixed integer. To support feature identification and asset inventory needs, the cameras provide a full 360 degree field of view, and they can be oriented in any direction depending upon the required field of view to meet project requirements. Additionally, the camera orientation may be changed from project to project. Each camera will collect images at a rate of up to every 10 feet. These photos are helpful with critical feature extraction as a fully geo-referenced back drop to the point clouds and to colorize the point clouds for a true world view capture. This also offers a great value to the city of Abilene. With the data being collected from multiple data collection sensors (cameras and LiDAR) in a single collect, the data is able to be shared across the many different departments within the city. Because of the high accuracy and high precision associated with LiDAR data, the city is able utilize the data for many applications including asset inventory, GIS, mapping, planning, safety, ADA compliance, utilities, etc. Prior to demobilizing the MMS equipment from a project site, preliminary processing of trajectories and raw scan data is necessary to ensure usable and quality data has been acquired. Final processing and adjustments will take place on high-powered work-stations at any one Transcend’s data centers or offices. Final processing includes refinement of the trajectories using Leica IE software, which consists of forward, backward, combined and smoothing algorithms to produce a Smoothed Best Estimate of Trajectory. With the Leica data processing software, the raw scan data records are geo-referenced to the trajectory, and the overlapping segments are adjusted to each other. Additionally, the images are calibrated to the scan data for RGB colorization. Once the final adjustments have been made, all reports are generated and the data is exported to the required file format for feature extraction. After the final data has been adjusted and outputted, the process of extracting the information from the images and point clouds begin. The current Transcend extraction team consists of highly experienced technicians including a staff with educational backgrounds as high as professional engineers. The Transcend team has completed many projects with a concentration on highway and municipality infrastructure. These projects range from two-lane rural roadways to entire multi-lane freeways including full interchanges. Having a vast experience on many large projects, Transcend has a data management workflow process that is followed. This workflow begins from the time of raw data acquisition to the time the deliverables are sent to the client. All raw data is received by the Project Manager and is archived in its original format. The data is then sent to the technician for formatting with the data extraction team. An independent control verification will be performed an all of the raw data and verified by the Project Manager. The proposed deliverable will then be divided into appropriate sections depending on the size and schedule. Additional technicians will be added to the team to perform the raw data extraction of the files using the data provided by the client. When completed, all extraction work will be merged by the lead technician and QA/QC’ed by the Project Manager prior to any delivery to the client. Because the Leica MapFactory software is native the ESRI ArcGIS platform, any edits that take place while using the software will immediately update the legacy database with most current information. This Page 126 of 159 Page 42 of 73 makes the Transcend solution the most innovated approach for the City of Georgetown. This will ensure that the City of Georgetown will be able to leverage the data maximizing the best return on the investment. Transcend has delivered projects both large and small and can work from any seed file provided by the client. Transcend mainly utilizes the Leica MapFactory extraction software for mobile mapping projects, but Transcend has several other data extraction and point cloud tools should they be needed. All of our computing workstations consist of the latest hardware components enabling our team to be as efficient as possible. This is very important when handling large datasets which is inevitable when utilizing mobile mapping technologies. Per the request of the city of Georgetown, TX, the following of list of assets will be extracted and attributed from the mobile mapping data set. Any future needs for information on additional assets can be extracted later for a negotiated price from the same data that was collected initially eliminating the need for future field visits or data collection. List of Assets and Description  Water Valves – the LiDAR technicians will utilize the laser point cloud data in conjunction with the high resolution digital imagery to locate and attribute the visible water valves within the dataset. These include valves that are flush, raised, sunken, and paved over if they are visible and it’s possible to identify previously paved over water valves.  Drop Inlets - the LiDAR technicians will utilize the laser point cloud data in conjunction with the high resolution digital imagery to locate and attribute the visible drop inlets within the dataset. The drop inlets have been directed to be attributed according to type and dimensions.  Guard Rails - the LiDAR technicians will utilize the laser point cloud data in conjunction with the high resolution digital imagery to locate and attribute the guard rails within the dataset.  Manhole Covers - the LiDAR technicians will utilize the laser point cloud data in conjunction with the high resolution digital imagery to locate and attribute the visible manhole covers within the dataset. These include manhole covers that are flush, raised, sunken, and paved over if they are visible and it’s possible to identify previously paved over manhole covers.  Concrete Collars – the LiDAR technicians will locate and attribute any concrete collars that exist around manhole covers that are visible in the dataset.  Signs - the LiDAR technicians will utilize the laser point cloud data in conjunction with the high resolution digital imagery to locate and attribute any visible signs within the dataset. The signs will be attributed with MUTCD code, sign dimensions, and sign text.  Posts - the LiDAR technicians will utilize the laser point cloud data in conjunction with the high resolution digital imagery to locate and attribute any visible posts within the dataset. The posts will be attributed according to type of post and height of posts Page 127 of 159 Page 43 of 73  Pavement Markings – Point (Symbols) - the LiDAR technicians will utilize the laser point cloud data in conjunction with the high resolution digital imagery to locate and attribute any visible pavement markings within the dataset. The pavement markings will be attributed with point symbols as directed  Pavement Markings – Linear - the LiDAR technicians will utilize the laser point cloud data in conjunction with the high resolution digital imagery to locate, digitize, and attribute any visible pavement markings within the dataset.  Curb & Gutter - the LiDAR technicians will utilize the laser point cloud data in conjunction with the high resolution digital imagery to locate, digitize, and attribute any visible curb and gutter within the dataset.  Pavement Crown - the LiDAR technicians will utilize the laser point cloud data in conjunction with the high resolution digital imagery to locate, digitize, and attribute if visible the pavement crown within the roadway of the entire project area dataset. The above list of assets and attributes is based on the below assumptions: 1. We assume the mentioned features attributes can be analyzed with the LiDAR data and digital imagery collected across the project area. 2. We assume that we will need to place a 2D point / 2D linear feature with the specified attributes information. 3. For Posts – we need to attribute with ‘Type’ and ‘Height’, we assume we need to analyze the height information from the collected point cloud data. 4. Signs a. MUTCD => we will capture the type of MUTCD from the high-resolution images that are collected. b. Sign Text => we will attribute sign text from the high-resolution digital imagery. c. Dimensions => we will measure the sign dimensions based on the LiDAR point cloud. 4.8 Additional Services Dynatest offers a wide range of consulting and engineering services, including pavement deflection testing and analysis, profiling measurements, pavement friction characteristics surveys, pavement distress surveys (manual and automated), and pavement management system installations. Our most widely known products include testing hardware such as the Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) and Road Surface profilers (RSP) as well as software, such as ELMOD 6.0 for pavement rehabilitation design following a Mechanistic-Empirical methodology. Dynatest has the capability to offer analysis of nondestructive testing data on both highway and airport pavements. The Dynatest team has a very experienced and capable staff available to support the City of Georgetown in developing pavement rehabilitation alternatives. Dynatest has extensive in-house capabilities to perform roadway structural and functional evaluation and pavement design. Dynatest brings to the table the fastest, safest FWD in the market. Officially released last year year, the Dynatest FastFWD uses a state-of-the-art electronic motor that replaces the traditional hydraulic system. This modification enables FastFWD to collect 75% more data points per hour with approximately 45% less traffic exposure. FastFWD technology provides a measurement foundation for Dynatest’s “analytical- Page 128 of 159 Page 44 of 73 empirical” pavement engineering methodology. In case the City of Georgetown requires pavement rehabilitation design and/or pavement structural evaluation Dynatest will be more than capable of providing its experience and assistance. Dynatest has also a vast experience providing pavement engineering training to cities, counties and Department of Transportation such as Georgia, Arkansas, Idaho, Puerto Rico, Nova Scotia, Alaska, Vermont, Louisiana, among others. 4.8.1 Falling Weight Deflectometer Dynatest, the original commercial developer of the Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) technology, is the world’s largest supplier of FWD technology. This highly accurate, well-supported, reliable, and continuously refined Dynatest product line is a proven load/deflection measurement solution for Engineers worldwide. The Dynatest FWD technology provides a measurement foundation for the proprietary Dynatest “analytical- empirical” pavement engineering methodology, a system of advanced automated pavement measurement and analysis products available only through Dynatest. The Dynatest Model 8000 FWD makes it possible to treat pavement structures in the same manner as other civil engineering structures by using mechanistically-based design methods. Selecting the type of rehabilitation for a given pavement is of considerable economic significance. To reach that decision without an adequate knowledge of the structural condition of the pavement may have very costly consequences. The use of a Dynatest FWD enables the Engineer to determine a deflection basin caused by a controlled load with accuracy and resolution superior to other existing test methods. The FWD produces a dynamic impulse load that simulates a moving wheel load, rather than a static, semi-static or vibratory load. These developments allow the use of mechanistic approaches to analyze FWD data. Dynatest was also the first to introduce a heavier loading FWD, the Dynatest Model 8081 HWD. With an expanded loading range, simulating heavy aircraft such as the Boeing 747 (one wheel), the HWD can properly introduce anticipated load and/or deflection measurements on even heavy pavements such as airfields and very thick highway pavements. The wider loading range also provides the Engineer with a load/deflection instrument appropriate for both roads and airfields as required. Page 129 of 159 Page 45 of 73 4.8.2 FWD Data Analysis FWD generated data, combined with layer thickness can be confidently used to obtain the ‘in-situ’ resilient E-moduli of a pavement structure. This information can in turn be used in a structural analysis to determine the bearing capacity, estimated expected life, and calculate an overlay requirement, if applicable (over a desired design life.) For routine analysis purposes, Dynatest has developed a software system, ELMOD® (Evaluation of Layer Moduli and Overlay Design), for evaluation and analysis of both flexible and rigid pavements. The latest version available is ELMOD® 6. This software allows extremely rapid data reduction and analysis of FWD/HWD measurements, calculating the layer E-moduli for a typical drop sequence in one second or less. Seasonally adjusted E-moduli, residual life, and required overlay (if applicable) are also calculated within seconds. For analysis of airfield pavements, Dynatest provides a program which calculates Pavement Condition Number (PCN)-values in accordance with the Aircraft Classification Number (ACN)/PCN method, as described in the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) design manuals. 4.8.3 Pavement Surface Friction Characteristics Testing Skid resistance testing is conducted using the Dynatest 1295 Pavement Friction Tester. The testing and reporting are performed in accordance with ASTM E274. The ASTM E501 standard rib tire or ASTM E524 standard smooth tire can be used for the testing in both left and right wheelpath at 40 or 60 mph while water is applied to the pavement ahead of the test tire to provide a 0.5 mm water film depth in accordance with E274. The testing can be performed on selected roadways and the skid number (SN) will be reported for each feature. Friction characteristics can be used as a network level indicator of roadway safety and also to better assess the effectiveness of a particular roadway maintenance application. The 1295 PFT consists of a fully instrumented tow vehicle and test trailer, which used the Dynatest two - axis force transducer to provide real time vertical load and horizontal tractive force measurements. As a pavement measurement device, the 1295 meets and exceeds all the requirements of ASTM E274. Page 130 of 159 Page 46 of 73 5 PRICING Dynatest’s pricing for this proposal to perform an automated pavement condition survey, update the City of Georgetown’s Cartegraph system, and provide pavement management services are shown in the table, below. The table below provides a summary of the prices by task for the proposed effort. Pricing Summary Phase 1. Project Management $27,460.00 Phase 2. Data Collection $71,800.00 Phase 3. Data Processing $49,360.00 Phase 4. Pavement Management Services $49,630.00 Phase 5. Pavement Management Final Report $11,940.00 Phase 6. Training $4,530.00 Phase 7. Asset Inventory (See details on following table) $138,592.00 TOTAL $353,312.00 Page 131 of 159 Page 47 of 73 Asset Inventory Pricing Details Project Management $12,600.00 Data Acquisition1 $25,200.00 Pre-Processing2 $35,200.00 Feature/Asset Extraction - Minimum Pricing3 $65,592.00 Description Minimum Qty Unit Unit Price Extended Price Water Valves: Flush, Raised, Sunken, Paved Over (if possible) 4000 ea $0.79 $3,160.00 Drop Inlets: Type and Dimensions 4000 ea $0.99 $3,960.00 Guardrails 40 mile $6.20 $248.00 Manhole Covers: Flush, Raised, Sunken, Paved Over (if possible) 4000 ea $0.79 $3,160.00 Concrete Collars 2000 ea $0.40 $800.00 Signs: Dimensions, MUTCD code, Sign Text 16000 ea $1.35 $21,600.00 Posts: Type, Height 16000 ea $1.16 $18,560.00 Pavement Markings: Points (symbols) 8000 ea $0.40 $3,200.00 Pavement Markings: Linear 400 mile $6.20 $2,480.00 Curb and Gutter 800 mile $7.43 $5,944.00 Pavement Crown 400 mile $6.20 $2,480.00 1 Additional Collection Fee on Top of Pavement Condition Survey for LiDAR System and Operator 2 Required as preprocessing step before asset extraction can be performed 3 All unit prices are based on minimum quantities. Lower quantities may result in higher unit rate. Quantities in excess of minimum amounts will use the same unit rate. Page 132 of 159 Page 48 of 73 6 KEY TEAM MEMBER RESUMES ROBERT R. WILLIAMS, P.E., APMP SENIOR ENGINEER EDUCATION MS, Civil Engineering, University of Texas at El Paso 2003 BS, Civil Engineering, University of Texas at El Paso 2002 LICENSES Texas Professional Civil Engineer 100100 APMP (IPMA Level D Certification; No. AP 167533) EXPERIENCE SUMMARY Mr. Williams has comprehensive experience in pavement management, evaluation, and design, including non-destructive testing methodologies. He consistently develops and refines new and existing tools and procedures to efficiently pre-process, analyze, and assure quality of data. Mr. Williams provides critical input and leadership in the development of new technology and equipment. He has experience in supervising and mentoring engineering and technical staff. He has supervisory experience and regularly supervises multi-disciplinary project teams on complex engineering and pavement management projects. He has more than 12 years of experience with pavement management software. Mr. Williams also utilizes specialty software on a regular basis on pavement analysis, evaluation, and pavement management projects. From March 2004 to December 2015 Mr. Williams worked for Fugro’s Austin office. During this time, Mr. Williams worked on ALL of Fugro’s municipal pavement management implementations and municipal pavement data collection projects managed out of the Austin, Texas office as either the project manager, technical lead, or both. This included all projects within the state of Texas. Starting in 2007, Mr. Williams was the professional engineer or record and managed ALL of Fugro’s municipal pavement management projects until leaving Fugro in December 2015. Several projects were in progress at this time with most at 90% or more completion. SIGNIFICANT PROJECT-RELATED EXPERIENCE City of San Antonio Pavement Management Services, San Antonio, Texas (2009-2012): As project manager, Mr. Williams led the inspection of approximately 4,000 centerline miles (4,800 test miles) of city streets. Roadside assets were inventoried that included sidewalks, curb ramps, drop inlets, signs, manholes, and water valves. Along with two subconsultants, which included PinPoint Geotech, Inc., ADA compliance inspections were performed on over 57,000 curb ramps on city streets. The pavement condition information was uploaded to the Cartegraph pavement management system and budget analyses used for long-term planning were provided to the City. Geodatabases were provided for sidewalk, curb ramp, drop inlet, and sign inventory. This project consisted of a phased implementation over three years:  Condition Survey. The condition survey took place in 2010. Collection started in January of 2010 and completed around July 2010. Data processing continued through November when PCI scores were finalized. Page 133 of 159 Page 49 of 73  Development of Rating Procedure. Prior to the 2010 condition survey, the City of San Antonio was using a legacy pavement management system that was a proprietary system developed by another consulting firm. This system used a Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) system that utilized a custom procedure for calculation condition scores. The City needed to decide whether to continue using the PCR system or to adapt the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) system (ASTM 6433). To perform a comparison of the two rating procedures, a 30 -mile pilot study of condition scores were calculated prior to starting data processing on a production level. Not only were the overall indices compared (PCR vs. PCI), but the individual distresses and their impacts on the overall condition scores. After performing this study, the City decided to go with a modified PCI approach, making some minor adjustments for specific severity levels distresses on specific roadway functional classes. The sensitivity analysis was not only performed to determine whether to use the PCR or PCI approach, this also served as a quality control step in which a comprehensive field audit was performed to ensure that the raw distress data was accurate and also that City personnel were in agreement of the final PCI scores calculated.  PCI Calculation. The modified ASTM approach for calculating a PCI was utilized for this project. Once all raw data was in the office, Fugro engineering staff reviewed the data further to ensure quality prior to upload to the pavement management system. The City of San Antonio implementation was done using the Cartegraph pavement management system.  Pavement Management System Installation and Configuration. While some degree of configuration was performed during the PCI calculation phase of the project, additional configuration was performed to allow City personnel to perform budget analyses on their own. Legacy condition information was transferred to the new system.  Asset Inventory. From the right-of-way (ROW) images taken during the pavement condition survey. Road signs, sidewalks, curb ramps, drop inlets, manholes, water valve covers, and concrete collars were all inventoried. Sidewalks had termini information gathered (latitude and longitude coordinates) along each roadway. Signs, drop inlets, and curb ramps were also geolocated and some attribute information was obtained from the imagery. For the in-street assets (manholes, water valves, concrete collars), condition information was provided for each road segment. Each manhole, water valve, and collar was assessed for being flush, sunken, risen, or paved over relative to the road surface. This information is vital when repaving a roadway to determine and budget for grade adjustments on these in-road assets. An estimated mileage of the missing miles of sidewalks was also provided with input from City staff.  Ramp Inspections. A special inspection of the curb ramps was performed to assess ADA compliance of each ramp maintained by the City. Along with PinPoint Geotech, Mr. Williams developed a software package for mobile GPS devices for ADA ramp inspections. Inspection criteria was defined by City personnel and programmed. Over 57,000 ramps were inspected using this procedure.  Budget Analysis and Executive Summary. Mr. Williams performed a budget analysis to estimate network condition and funding needs over a 10-year period. The City’s funding levels, decision matrix, and budget allocation were all evaluated to optimize the City’s current budget, as well as project necessary funding for obtaining a target pavement condition level. Mr. Williams personally oversaw all budget analyses for this project and wrote the entire executive summary technical report with budget funding recommendations.  Increase in Funding. Based on the budget analysis executive summary written by Mr. Williams, the streets department was able to obtain several million additional dollars in funding to their Page 134 of 159 Page 50 of 73 annual budget. The report documented the current needs and projected future funding needs played a large role in the department obtaining more funding.  Training. Mr. Williams designed and gave a one-week training class on using the Cartegraph pavement management system as well as training on pavement management concepts to City of San Antonio personnel.  Current System. The City of San Antonio is still using the overall process that Mr. Williams implemented and configured to manage their pavement management system. Documentation of procedures and processes provided to the City has allowed them to continue to utilize the system on a daily basis and use it for their Capital and Maintenance Planning that they do each year. City of McKinney Pavement Management Services, McKinney, Texas (2005, 2007, 2009, 2012, 2015): Mr. Williams has performed five pavement management projects for the City of McKinney, TX with a network size of approximately 600 centerline miles. The pavement condition information was uploaded to the Cartegraph pavement management system and budget analyses and a formal pavem ent management report with maintenance and rehabilitation recommendations was provided to the City. Mr. Williams worked on this project first as a graduate engineer, then project engineer (engineer of record), and finally as project manager on the past three updates. The final report for the latest round of data collection was under client review when Mr. Williams left his previous firm and was sealed by another engineer. Mr. Williams has directed all technical aspects of the McKinney projects over the years, including data collection, budget analyses, and reporting. Mr. Williams was the engineer of record who sealed the reports in 2009 and 2012 and managed the 2015 to 99% completion. City of Tyler Pavement Management Services, Tyler, Texas (2012 -2014): Mr. Williams served as project manager for the inspection of approximately 550 miles of city streets. The pavement condition information was uploaded to the MicroPAVER pavement management system and budget analyses and a formal pavement management report with maintenance and rehabilitation recommendations was provided to the City. The scope of this project was an initial implantation for the City of Tyler. As this was an initial inspection and implementation, a lot of effort was placed on inventory review from different data sources. Maintenance practices and unit costs currently used by the City of Tyler were reviewed to develop a decision tree that could be programmed into the MicroPAVER pavement management system. Budget levels were then input into the system and a final budget analysis was run to project network condition and needs for a 5-year forecast. Mr. Williams performed a training on the MicroPAVER software as well as pavement management concepts for City of Tyler personnel. Mr. Williams was the engineer of record and sealed all formal reports submitted to the City. City of Austin Pavement Data Collection for Pavement Management System, Austin, Texas (2010-2013): Mr. Williams served as project manager for pavement data collection and processing for two full survey cycles of 2,600 miles of roadway over roughly three years. Automated data collected included pavement images, right-of-way imagery, and roughness. Information was collected and pavement condition information was summarized and then submitted to the City in Esri’s Geodatabase format. Viewing software that displayed the right-of-way and pavement imagery as well as a summarization of pavement distress and roughness. This multi-year project encompassed one full network survey and then two half- network surveys for a total of two full coverages of the City’s entire network. Mr. Williams worked with technical staff to help design this custom viewing software for the City of Austin. No formal engineering report was required for this project. City of Missouri City Sidewalk Inventory and Inspection (2013): Mr. Williams served as project manager and lead technical expert for sidewalk inspections along approximately 300 centerline miles of roadway for the City of Missouri City, TX. With PinPoint Geotech as a subcontractor, Mr. Williams led the technical development of a GPS handheld system for sidewalk inspections. Sidewalk defects were recorded in the field as well as sidewalk centerlines and photos of defects to aid in repair of sidewalks. Geotagged Page 135 of 159 Page 51 of 73 information on the precise location of all sidewalk failures, type of failure, and estimated repair cost were provided for the City’s entire network. The handheld data collection system allowed for inventory and location of sidewalks that were not adjacent to roadways or sidewalks that moved far off from the roadway in places, but still maintained by the City. A report summarizing field data collection, inventory, sidewalk attributes, and estimated repairs was provided to the City. This report did not require a professional engineer’s seal. City of Haltom City Pavement Management Services, Haltom City, Texas (2012). Managed inspection of approximately 160 miles of city streets. The pavement condition information was uploaded to the Cartegraph pavement management system and budget analyses and a formal pavement management report with maintenance and rehabilitation recommendations was provided to the City. Asset inventory services were also provided to the City. Additionally, a CIP plan was developed through a subconsultant. City of Missouri City Pavement Management Services, Missouri City, Texas (2012-2013). Managed inspection of approximately 290 miles of city streets. The pavement condition information was uploaded to the Cartegraph pavement management system and a formal report documenting network conditions was provided to the City. No formal budget analysis was performed. City of Irving Pavement Management Services, Irving, Texas (managed to 80% completion), Managed inspection of approximately 544 centerline miles (1,200 test miles) of city streets. The pavement condition information will be uploaded to the MicroPAVER pavement management system and budget analyses and a formal pavement management report with maintenance and rehabilitation recommendations was provided to the City. The MicroPAVER software will be integrated with the Cityworks software that the City of Irving also utilizes. Budget optimization and pavement condition improvement analyses was performed to help develop long-term budgets for the City of Irving. In addition, based on the results of the pavement management implementation study, a CIP plan will be developed. Managed two subconsultants who are providing support on the Cityworks integration and CIP plan development. Pavement condition results were also be published to the web-viewing software. This project was still in progress when Mr. Williams changed firms. Project was approximately at 80% completion. City of Richardson Pavement Management Services, Richardson, Texas, 2015: (managed to 99 % completion). Managed pavement data collection and processing of approximately 760 test miles of city streets. The pavement condition information was provided in spreadsheet and GIS format as well as in a web-viewing software. A report summarizing network condition is was provided. No budget analysis was performed for this project. This project was still in progress when Mr. Williams changed firms. Project was approximately at 99% completion. City of San Angelo Pavement Management Services, San Angelo, Texas, 2015 (managed to 99% completion). Project consisted of approximately 550 centerline miles (675 test miles) of city streets. The pavement condition information will be uploaded to the Cartegraph pavement management system and budget analyses and a formal pavement management report with maintenance and rehabilitation recommendations was provided to the City. Budget optimization and pavement condition improvement analyses will be performed to help develop long-term budgets for the City of San Angelo. In addition, based on the results of the pavement management implementation study, a CIP plan will be developed. One subconsultant who is providing support on the CIP plan development. Pavement condition results will also be published the web viewing software. This project was still in progress when Mr. Williams changed firms. Reuben presented the results of the study to City Council. This project was still in progress when Mr. Williams changed firms. Project was approximately at 99% completion. City of Coppell Pavement Management Services and Asset Inventory (2011): Mr. Williams served as project manager for the inspection of approximately 240 test miles of city streets. The pavement condition information was uploaded to the MicroPAVER pavement management system and budget analyses and a formal pavement management report with maintenance and rehabilitation recommendations was provided to the City. A work listing for every street in the City was provided with estimated quantities and Page 136 of 159 Page 52 of 73 costs for crack and joint sealing, slab repair, patching, and other recommended repairs. Network level budget analysis and PCI scores were also provided over a five-year projection. Identification of sidewalks and curb and gutter locations were also provided to the City. MicroPAVER training was provided to City personnel at the end of the project as well as a formal engineering report sealed by Mr. Williams. PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT AND PAVEMENT DISTRESS DATA COLLECTION:  2015 Pennsylvania DOT Statewide Pavement Condition Survey – managed inspection of approximately 30,000 miles of distress data collection and processing. Coordinated project tasks with multiple departments within the company.  2014 Pennsylvania DOT Statewide Pavement Condition Survey – managed inspection of approximately 30,000 miles of distress data collection and processing. Coordinated project tasks with multiple departments within the company.  City of San Antonio Pavement Management Implementation of 4,800 miles of City roadways; includes asset management, ADA ramp compliance inspections, and budget/PCI analysis. Based on analysis of network needs performed as a result of this project, the City of San Antonio TCI department was able to nearly double the street maintenance budget from 2012.  City of Austin Pavement Data Collection of approximately 2,500 miles (in year three of ongoing three-year project with two full network c overages; 2010, 2012, and 2013)  Charleston County, South Carolina: Implemented Earth Road Management System which included inspection and inventory of all unpaved roads in the County’s network (200 miles).  City of Irving, Texas – Pavement Management System implementation and CIP Plan Development. Overseeing 1,200 miles of roadway inspections and development of maintenance and CIP plans for the City of Irving, Texas. Coordinating with two subconsultants providing support for CIP plan development and software implementation. Project includes ranking of condition of roadways for project selection, evaluation for suitability for inclusion in CIP plan, and grouping of projects for annual work plan. (80% completion upon departure from Fugro).  Other pavement management projects: City of Richardson, TX, City of San Angelo, TX, City of Waco, TX, City of Pflugerville, TX, Travis County, TX; City of McKinney, TX (5); Bexar County, TX; Mohave County, AZ, Charleston County, SC (2, paved and unpaved networks), City of Universal City, TX, City of San Marcos, TX (2), City of Georgetown, TX (4), City of Coppell, TX, City of Haltom City, TX, City of Tyler, TX, City of Missouri City, TX, Portland, TX, Seattle, WA, Nanaimo, BC, City of Cedar Park, TX  Sidewalk inspection and management system: City of Missouri City, TX  Elm Creek Homeowners Association, San Antonio, TX  Grand Parkway, Houston, TX – condition survey of intersecting roadways  San Antonio Joint Base Condition Survey  Los Alamos National Laboratory: PCI analysis of 92 miles of roadway.  Airport Pavement Design/Evaluation  Love Field, Dallas, TX; Rick Husband Airport, Amarillo, TX; Arlington Municipal  Airport, Arlington, TX; Hondo Airport, TX; Other Cities and Private Airfields PAVEMENT DESIGN:  Design Procedures: AASHTO 1993, Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide, TxDOT, and local (Austin area) pavement design procedures  North Tarrant Express, Ft. Worth, TX, Segments 1, 1C, 2E, 3A, and 3B: Evaluated Falling Weight Deflectometer data along geotechnical investigation and previous geotechnical reports to develop pavement design and rehabilitation recommendations for flexible and rigid pavements. Page 137 of 159 Page 53 of 73 This spanned several separate projects on the proposal phase effort. Analyses included backcalculation using Modulus software and pavement designs using FPS 19W, AASHTO 1993, and the MEPDG. Additional analyses included Potential Vertical Rise (PVR) calculations using TxDOT procedures and recommendations for remove and replacement of material obtained desired PVR values.  SH 130, Segments 5.1, 5.2, and 6.1: Performed structural evaluation of Falling Weight Deflectometer and Ground Penetrating Radar data on US 183 in support of new pavement designs for the planned toll road (at that time). Project involvement was primarily on the structural evaluation phase of the project.  Liberty Road (Pennsylvania Turnpike): Sensitivity analysis of different pavement designs (flexible and rigid) and varying traffic levels using 1993 AASHTO Design procedure and PennDOT design guide.  Indiana Toll Road (evaluation and design): Evaluation of Ground Penetrating Radar, Falling Weight Deflectometer, and Distress Survey information in support of rehabilitation and overlay recommendations on rigid and flexible pavements using AASTHO 1993 procedures and industry standard backcalculation software.  SH 29 & CR 104, Georgetown, TX  Gattis School Rd., Round Rock, TX  Round Rock Ramp Reversal Project (2012): Structural evaluation using Falling Weight Deflectometer and geotechnical investigation to obtain new pavement designs and overlay recommendations for widening of I-35 and new ramp reconstruction. TxDOT evaluation and design procedures were used.  FM 1431, Round Rock, TX (2012): Performed structural evaluation using Falling Weight Deflectometer and geotechnical investigation to obtain new pavement design recommendations for the reconstruction and widening project on FM 1431.  Evaluation of Pavement Design Procedures within TxDOT’s Odessa District: Performed Falling Weight Deflectometer, Light Weight Deflectometer, and laboratory testing to evaluate pavement layers. Then a sensitivity analyses of TxDOT, AASTHO  1993, and MEPDG design procedures was performed. A presentation was given to the Odessa District on staff with the project findings.  Parking lot designs in City of Georgetown, TX  Various other local subdivision, city, county, and state pavement designs PAVEMENT RESEARCH:  Federal Highway Administration: Long Term Pavement Performance program – occasional involvement in project PAVEMENT EVALUATION, STRUCTURAL TESTING, AND FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT:  Oklahoma Department of Transportation: Performed structural evaluation of approximately 3,500 miles of National Highway System routes. Analysis included Falling Weight Deflectometer, Ground Penetrating Radar, and Pavement Coring; Additional analysis of 450 miles of non- National Highway System routes  Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development: Structural evaluation of  250 miles of roadways flooded by Hurricane Katrina  New Orleans Submerged Road Program (3 projects): Structural evaluation and rehabilitation recommendations of roadways flooded by Hurricane Katrina. Fourth project slated to start in Page 138 of 159 Page 54 of 73 spring 2013. Project scope has ranged from FW D, GPR, distress survey, and coring analyses to solely pavement coring. Served as project manager on latest two rounds (2012 and 2013).  Structural Evaluation of FW D data on US 90 in Mississippi, flooded by Hurricane Katrina  Midway and Webb Chapel Roads in Farmers Branch, TX (evaluation and design)  State Highway 130, TX  Parking lot forensic and structural evaluation for Arkansas Electrical Cooperative, Jacksonville, Arkansas  Parking lot structural evaluation for “The Rim” in San Antonio, TX  North Luzon Expressway, Phillippines: Ground Penetrating Radar testing & analysis. Also performed longitudinal profile testing (International Roughness Index) and right-of-way image logging of each lane of the entire tollway. PAVEMENT EVALUATION AND ANALYSIS INSTRUCTOR: North Central Texas Council of Governments – Taught various pavements related classes from 2011 – 2015 covering topics including pavement management, evaluation, design, maintenance, and rehabilitation. PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: Member, American Society of Civil Engineers Member, American Public Works Association Transportation Research Board – Former Member of Committee on Strength & Deformation Characteristics of Pavement Sections (AFD80) PUBLICATIONS:  “S a n A nto n i o Cond i t i o n S u r v e y s Com b i n e Mi x o f D i f f e r ent T ools,” W i l lia ms , Rober t R., T i mot h y J . Ma r t i n , a n d R ichar d E . Ma r t i n e z , P a v emen t P r e s e r v ati o n J o u r nal , Wi nte r 2012. (a v a ilabl e onlin e at http://www.fp2.o r g /p av em ent-pr e servation-jou rna l/)  “C o rre l ati o n o f Resili ent and S e ism i c Modu l u s Te s t Res ul t s ,” R . R . Willia m s and S . Naz a r i an, J o u r nal o f Mat e r i a l s i n C ivi l E ngi neer i n g , A m e r ica n S ocie t y o f C ivi l E ngi nee r s . Dec e m b e r 200 7 .  A Sim p l e M etho d f o r Dete r m in i n g M o d u l u s o f B as e and S ubg r ade Ma t e r i a ls,” S . Naz a r i an, D . Y uan , and R . R . Wi lliam s , Resil i ent Mo dul u s T e s t i n g f o r P a v emen t Compon e nts , AST M S T P 1437 , G .N . Dur ham , W. A . Ma r r , and W. L . DeGro ff, E d s ., AST M Int e r na t i ona l , We s t Con s hoho cke n , PA, p p . 1 52-16 4 , 200 3 .  “Feasib ili t y o f I m p l e men t i n g Dat a F u sio n T ec h n i ques i n Non -Des t r u c t ive T es t i ng of P a v e m e nts ,” Mas ter’s Th e sis , Robe r t R . W illi a ms , T h e Unive rsit y o f Te x a s a t E l P a s o , 2003. Page 139 of 159 Page 55 of 73 SALIL GOKHALE SENIOR ENGINEER EDUCATION Post-Baccalaureate Certificate in GIS, Pennsylvania State University, 2011 M.S., Civil Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, 2001 B.E., Civil Engineering, Govt. College of Engineering, Pune, India, 1998 LICENSE Professional Engineer, Florida, No. 66552 EXPERIENCE SUMMARY Mr. Gokhale has worked in the highway and pavement engineering field for over thirteen years. His areas of expertise include pavement management systems, automated and manual pavement condition surveys, GIS integration, pavement design and analysis, non-destructive testing, accelerated pavement testing (APT) research, vehicle-pavement interaction, life cycle cost analysis, data mining, and statistical analysis. Mr. Gokhale has participated in several state- and national-level research projects, and has published more than 15 peer-reviewed papers and technical reports. Mr. Gokhale joined Dynatest Consulting in 2008 and currently serves as a project engineer and manager based in their Starke, Florida office. He is heavily involved in Dynatest’s software/hardware product development focusing on automated pavement condition analyses. Mr. Gokhale oversees a multitude of pavement engineering and consulting projects including pavement management systems implementation, non-destructive structural testing on airfield and highway pavements, software sales and training. Before joining Dynatest, Mr. Gokhale worked as a full-time, on-site consultant research engineer for the Florida Department of Transportation’s (FDOT) Materials Research Park in Gainesville, Florida. He worked extensively with FDOT’s pavement evaluation and research groups, and was tasked numerous projects involving non-destructive testing, pavement management and life cycle cost analyses, accelerated pavement testing and materials research, and vehicle-pavement interaction. SIGNIFICANT PROJECT-RELATED EXPERIENCE PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT Mr. Gokhale has performed numerous pavement condition inspections on roadway and airfield pavements, and is well versed with pavement management software. He has served as the Project Manager/Engineer on the following projects within the last five years: PCI survey (semi-automated) and pavement profile measurements on over 4,000 lane miles of rural County roadways in Michigan, Illinois, Missouri, Kansas and Oklahoma. These surveys were performed as part of a pre-construction roadway evaluation of haul routes for Enbridge Energy Inc. MicroPAVER update, PCI survey (semi-automated) and pavement profile measurements on more than 1,800 lane miles for Prince George’s County, Maryland. Page 140 of 159 Page 56 of 73 MicroPAVER implementation and PCI survey (semi-automated) on more than 2,200 lane miles for the City of Indianapolis, Indiana. In addition, pavement profile measurements were performed on over 1,100 lane miles of arterial roadways. Pavement condition surveys (windshield surveys) on over 2,600 lane miles of roadways for Lee County, Florida. Pavement profile measurements on more than 3,600 miles of State maintained highways in the State of Alaska (2009 through 2013). This annual project includes updating the pavement management system, developing work plans, economic analysis and GIS integration. Pavement Condition Surveys and Cartegraph Pavement Management System Implementation on over 350 centerline miles for the Matanuska-Susitna Borough, Alaska. Pavement profile measurements and GIS analyses on over 1,100 lane-kilometers of highways for the Government of Yukon, Canada (2010 through 2013) as part of their pavement management system update. Pavement management system data collection (semi-automated) and analysis update on more than 500 km of roadways for the province of Zuid Holland, Netherlands. MicroPAVER implementation and PCI survey (automated) on over 1,100 lane miles of roadway pavements for the Cook County Highway Department, Illinois. MicroPAVER implementation and PCI survey on over 800 lane miles of roadway pavements for the City of Wichita Falls, Texas. PAVEMENT EVALUATION AND TESTING Mr. Gokhale has extensive experience with non-destructive pavement testing equipment including the Falling Weight Deflectometer (H/FWD), pavement profilers and friction testing equipment. Mr. Gokhale was the project manager for a multi-year, pavement testing and analysis contract for the Florida Department of Transportation. Over a period of six years, his team conducted FWD and pavement profile measurements on more than 7,500 highway miles. HWD testing on all runways, taxiways, aprons and ramps at the Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport, Atlanta, Georgia. More than 5,500 test points (testing conducted on a three year cycle) HWD testing at the Sangster International Airport in Montego Bay, Jamaica, including overlay design, remaining life and PCN analyses. HWD testing and analyses including layer moduli and overlay design at the Holman Field Airport, St. Paul, Minnesota. HWD testing at Memphis International Airport, Ft. Lauderdale International Airport, Daytona International Airport and Orlando-Sanford International Airport. Structural evaluation of the Parks Highway in Alaska. This project included FWD testing, analysis, evaluation of existing structural conditions, and overlay design on more than 300 miles on the Parks Highway. Page 141 of 159 Page 57 of 73 Project manager/engineer for statewide friction and texture measurements in the State of Wisconsin. This project included an analysis and evaluation of more than 3,400 pavement sections located in the State. Project engineer for numerous FWD testing projects in Florida, Texas, California and Georgia. These projects typically involve estimation of layer moduli, calculation of structural numbers, and calculation of required overlay thicknesses and estimates of remaining life. PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Member, American Society of Civil Engineers, T&DI Member, Transportation Research Board (AFD20) Member, Indian Roads Congress Treasurer & Member of the Board, Association of Transportation Professionals of Indian Origin. Page 142 of 159 Page 58 of 73 EDUCATION Ph.D., Civil Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, 2013 M.S., Civil Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, 2009 Post-Baccalaureate Licensure in Civil Engineering, 2006 LICENSE PE (Civil Engineering), California, 83661 PE (Civil Engineering), Texas, 123961 Professional Engineer, Costa Rica IC, Number 17881 EXPERIENCE SUMMARY Dr. Ulloa has been involved in pavement/material engineering since 2006. His background includes state- of-the-art pavement material characterization, tire-pavement interaction, Mechanistic-Empirical pavement design, pavement modeling using dynamic viscoelastic analysis, and geotechnical engineering. He has published over 10 journal papers, and research reports, along with several conference podium presentations. He is bilingual, fluent in English and Spanish. Dr. Ulloa has been involved in several pavement non-destructive testing evaluation projects. He is has conducted pavement evaluation involving structural performance (using Falling Weight Deflectometer and material characterization), functional performance (using Roadway Surface Profiler and Friction Tester devices), and pavement management and design. He has also taught university-level courses and provides pavement engineering and deflection backcalculation training (Dynatest ELMOD 6.0), in both English and Spanish, for cities, research centers, and consultant companies throughout United States and Latin America. SIGNIFICANT PROJECT-RELATED EXPERIENCE PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT AND PAVEMENT DISTRESS DATA COLLECTION: Dr. Ulloa has been involved in a series of pavement distress data collection projects for both roadway networks and airfields. Manual distress survey methodologies include City of Wichita Falls, TX, Tyndall, FL, Laughing, TX, Spofford, TX Air Force Bases, among others. In addition, Dr. Ulloa has conducted automated pavement distress surveys including Coconino, AZ, Seal Beach Naval Weapons Station, CA, and CALTRANS HPMS, etc. PAVEMENT EVALUATION AND STRUCTURAL TESTING: Dr. Ulloa has extensive knowledge with non-destructive pavement testing equipment and methods. He has been project manager for several rehab and reconstruction pavement design and analysis. His involvement includes pavement evaluation and recommendations for projects such as: City of, North Dakota State University FWD Testing and Analysis, Rehabilitation of I-30 and I-55 roadway section in Arkansas, pavement evaluation in Calipatria, California, Turner Turnpike, and I-44 pavement rehab. PAVEMENT EVALUATION AND ANALYSIS INSTRUCTOR: Dr. Ulloa has provided several pavement design and pavement layer backcalculation training courses for city engineers, research centers, state department of transportation engineers, and pavement engineering consultants in the following locations: Vermont, Louisiana Transportation Research Center, Nova Scotia Department of Transportation, Asociacion de Consultores en Ingenieria (Honduras), Gevial (Colombia), City of Redlands, CA, among others. ALVARO ULLOA, PH.D, PE SENIOR ENGINEER Page 143 of 159 Page 59 of 73 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Member, American Society of Civil Engineers Member, Transportation Research Board Page 144 of 159 Page 60 of 73 SARA ALZATE ENGINEER EDUCATION M.S., Civil Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Specialty Geotechnical and Pavement Road; Pontifical Xavierian University (Bogota, Colombia 2007) Civil Engineering; Pontifical Xavierian University (Bogota, Colombia 2003) EXPERIENCE SUMMARY Ms. Alzate is a Civil Engineer specialized in Geotechnical and Pavement Roads. She has worked in Engineering Pavement Consulting since 2003, with experience in the private and public sector. As a Senior Engineer in Central and South America, she is responsible for the projects in the public sector and conservation of pavements. She graduated from the Pontifical Xavierian University in Bogotá, Colombia, where she earned her specialization in Geotechnics Vial and pavements. In 2008 she earned her Master of Science in Civil Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, during which time she worked as a research assistant for nondestructive evaluation projects for airport pavements project under FAA. Before she started working for Dynatest, she led the Regional Road Plan, an investment program of the Inter-American Development Bank with the Ministry of Transport seeking the development of management plans for the departmental road network in the country. Ms. Alzate, has also been a professor at the Military University of Colombia in Asphalt Technology and regularly speaks at national and international conferences. SIGNIFICANT PROJECT-RELATED EXPERIENCE SENIOR ENGINEER, DYNATEST CASA Responsible for the public sector projects and pavement maintenance through management systems and alternative interventions. Nov. 2015 – present. DIRECTOR OF PAVEMENT LABORATORY, PRI ASPHALT Responsible for customer management, project structuring and growth department of pavements (asphalt mixes, recycled and surface treatments) for laboratory research and design. USA Tampa, FL 4/2015 - 10/2015. ROAD PLAN REGIONAL LEADER. MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION Structuring the PVR II for intermodal transport infrastructure. The plan aims to strengthen the management of local authorities in managing the assets of road transportation, including issues with pavement management and road maintenance. Colombia. 1/2014 - 1/2015 TECHNICAL DIRECTOR OF THE INSTITUTE OF STRATEGIC URBAN DEVELOPMENT-IDU Responsible for the GIS group, research in materials and specifications of roads, research into technologies for road construction input costs for road construction and pavement management system for the City of Bogotá D.C. 05/2013 - 11/2013 TECHNICAL MARKETING MANAGER-LATINOAMERICA, ROAD SCIENCE DIVISION OF ARMAZ Page 145 of 159 Page 61 of 73 In charge of technical support and increased sales for Latin America (emulsifiers and additives for asphalt). The configuration of the strategy for Latin America is based on pavement preservation techniques. 01/2012 - 04/2013. PAVEMENT ENGINEER, ROY D. MCQUEEN AND ASSOCIATES-TECHNICAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR CALIFORNIA AND NEVADA, ROAD SCIENCE DIVISION OF ARMAZ In charge of technical support, design and recommendations for the increase in sales for California and Nevada. Various projects related to systems (recycling, modified mixtures, ultrathin layers, micropavements). Participation in various committees for CALTRANS in the development and approval of specifications related to pavement maintenance. 07/2009 - 11/2012. RESEARCH ASSISTANT, UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA CHAMPAIGN Engineer in charge of data processing and preparation of PMS for various airports in the US 08/2008 - 7/2009 DEPARTMENT HEAD OF PAVEMENTS, CIVILTEC INGENIEROS LTDA Responsible for leading the team proposals, methodological, evaluation and geotechnical analysis, design, pavement management plans using the HDM-IV tool, supervision and analysis of unit prices for the division of pavements. More than 200 km designed urban and rural roads designed in various projects. 06 / 2005-08 / 2006 PROJECT COORDINATOR AND PAVEMENT ENGINEER, CIVILTEC INGENIEROS LTDA Preparation of proposals, methodological, evaluation and geotechnical analysis, design, pavement management plans using the HDM-IV tool. Coordination of projects for the construction of road works in the city of Bogota. 01 / 2003-06 / 2005 ACADEMIC EXPERIENCE Chair of Asphalt Technology. First Semester 2014 - First Semester 2015. Military University Chair of Road Infrastructure Construction. First Semester 2014. Pontifical Xavierian University Page 146 of 159 Page 62 of 73 CRAIG COX PROCESS IMPROVEMENT/AUTOMATION SPECIALIST EDUCATION University of Texas, Austin, TX, January 1990 – December 1992 Coursework in: Civil Engineering, 36 hours Southwest Texas State University, San Marcos, TX, September 1981 – May 1983 Major: Computer Science Mirno: Mathematics Graduated with a Bachelor of Science Degree in Computer Science Tarleton State University, Stephenville, TX, June 1977 – May 1979 Coursework in: Pre Engineering EXPERIENCE SUMMARY Results driven professional who is extremely persistent in problem solving. Work skills include database, software, and web development. An approachable individual with good communication skills who can work effectively with teams or independently. Learns quickly and can adapt easily to advances in technology. Process Improvement/Automation Specialist, Fugro Roadware, Inc., October 2012 – Present  Prepare, process, and run quality control applications on pavement related data for the Federal Highway  Administration’s Long Term Pavement Performance monitoring system’s annual data release.  Developed quality control tools and conversion processes for a Texas Department of Transportation project to gather, assemble, and deliver pavement condition data.  Developed applications and quality control tools to import pavement condition data into MicroPAVER and Cartegraph for municipality’s pavement management systems.  Developed an application on MS Access for friction data that was collected for the state of Louisiana.  Developed an application on MS Access for coring data that was collected for the state of Louisiana. Programmer/Systems Analyst, Texas Department of Transportation, January 1985 – September 2012  Maintained, improved, and enhanced the department’s pavement management system.  Developed mapping applications on MS Access and ArcGIS using the pavement management data.  Developed tools on MS Access to view and summarize pavement management data.  Processed pavement related data that was submitted to the Federal Highway Administration’s Highway Performance Monitoring System.  Participated as an instructor for the pavement rater training classes. Page 147 of 159 Page 63 of 73 Technical Skills  Languages: ASP.NET, C#, HTML, Javascript, NATURAL, PERL, SAS, VBA, VBScript  Development Tools: ArcGIS, MS Visual Studio, SQL Developer, SQL Server Management Studio  Pavement Management Tools: Cartegraph, MicroPAVER  Operating Systems: Windows  Database Systems: Oracle, SQL Server  Office Applications: Microsoft Office Suite (Access, Excel, Power Point, and Word) AWARDS Albert H. Pollard award, TxDOT, 2004, for “outstanding contributions in the materials, tests, and pavements field” (PMIS MapZapper). Page 148 of 159 Page 64 of 73 Omar Elbagalati, Ph.D., EIT Assistant Pavement Engineer Education Ph.D. Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, La, 2014 – 2017 M.S. Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt, 2008 – 2012 B.S. Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt, 2003 – 2008 Experience Summary Dr. Elbagalati is an Assistant Pavement Engineer at Dynatest since February 2017. He has more than nine years of experience in pavement engineering, including Pavement Non-Destructive Testing Pavement Management Systems, and Pavement Design. As an Assistant Pavement Engineer, Dr. Elbagalati has contributed to pavement condition evaluation and pavement management system implementations projects such as City of Wichita Falls, TX; City of Oviedo, FL; City of Port Angeles, WA; City of Topeka, KA, City of Frisco, TX, and City of Milton, GA. Prior to joining Dynatest, Dr. Elbagalati served as Research Assistant at Louisiana State University where he conducted several projects Such as, developing a frame work to implement non-destructive deflection testing measurements into the State of Louisiana Pavement Management System; and developing self- healed asphalt concrete mix using induction heating. Dr. Elbagalati also served as the Fundamentals of Pavement Design and Surveying Courses instructor at Louisiana State University. He has published numerous technical papers on pavement analysis, performance and pavement management and is an active Technical Paper Reviewer for several internationally recognized Journals as well as Transportation Research Board Committees. In addition, Dr. Elbagalati served as a professional research assistant at Arizona State University, where he was involved in two major research projects; evaluating the effect of polyethylene and polypropylene fibers on the performance grades of asphalt binders and evaluating the use of hydrated lime and Portland cement on the aging behavior of the asphalt mixtures. Reviewer Standing Committee on Full-Scale Accelerated Pavement Testing at the Transportation Research Board Standing Committee on Artificial Intelligence and Advanced Computing Applications at the Transportation Research Board Standing Committee on Pavement Management Systems at the Transportation Research Board The American Society of Civil Engineering (ASCE) Journal of Transportation Engineering Journal of Engineering Mechanics Honors Fully funded six month visiting research assistant scholarship at Arizona State University. Graduate student enrichment award from the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department at Louisiana State University. Page 149 of 159 Page 65 of 73 SADAF KHOSRAVIFAR, PH.D. PROJECT ENGINEER EDUCATION Ph.D. University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 2012 – 2015 Civil and Environmental Engineering, (GPA 4.0 | 4.0) Emphasis on Geotechnical and Pavement Engineering Dissertation: Standardizing the Lightweight Deflectometer for QA of Unbound Material M.S. University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 2009 – 2012 Civil and Environmental Engineering, (GPA 4.0 | 4.0) Emphasis on Geotechnical and Pavement Engineering Thesis: Design and mechanical properties of foamed asphalt stabilized base material B.S. Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran, 2004 – 2008 Civil and Environmental Engineering EXPERIENCE SUMMARY COMPUTER SKILLS: MATLAB, ANSYS, Pavement Mechanics and Design (MEPDG, EverSeries, Kenpave, Elmod6, ModTag, LWDmod), Constitutive modeling of asphalt mixture (Alpha-Fatigue), Modeling of soils and other porous material in unsaturated phase (Seep-W, Hydrus), Structural and foundation design (medium proficiency in ETABS, SAFE, SAP), AutoCAD, MS Office Suite (Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Access). Programming: Pascal, Basic. TECHNICAL PAPER REVIEW: International Journal of Pavement Engineering; ASTM Journal of Testing and Evaluation; Transportation Research Board AFP60 and AFD80 committee (2013 – 16); ASCE Geo‐Congress Conference (2012 – 14) MENTORSHIP: University of Maryland, College Park, MD, Aug. 2013 – Present Advised three master students in Professor Schwartz’s research group. Duties included holding weekly meetings with the students; advising them on their research project; training them on using the laboratory and field testing equipment namely UTM-100, Instron, LWD, Geogauge; guidance on writing technical articles, and making presentations. LEADERSHIP: University of Maryland, College Park, MD, Sep. 2012 – Present Graduate Student Council, Civil and Environmental Engineering Department. Served as the president, treasurer, and member of the committee during the course of involvement; organized and held social and academic events; wrote fundraising proposals. PUBLICATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS Peer Reviewed Journal Papers: Khosravifar, S., Haider, I., Afsharikia, Z., and Schwartz, C. W. (2015). Application of Time–Temperature Superposition to Develop Master Curves of Cumulative Plastic Strain in Repeated Load Permanent Page 150 of 159 Page 66 of 73 Deformation Tests. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 16, Issue 3, pp 214 – 223, DOI: 10.1080/10298436.2014.937810 Khosravifar, S., Schwartz, C. W., and Goulias, D. G. (2015). Mechanistic Structural Properties of Foamed Asphalt Stabilised Base Materials. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 16, Issue 1, pp 27 – 38, DOI: 10.1080/10298436.2014.893330 Bassani, M., Khosravifar, S., Goulias, D. G., and Schwartz, C. W. (2014). Long-Term Resilient and Permanent Deformation Behaviour of Controlled Low-Strength Materials for Pavement Applications. Transportation Geotechnics, (Published online Dec. 19 2014), DOI: 10.1016/j.trgeo.2014.12.001 PEER REVIEWED CONFERENCE PAPERS AND PRESENTATIONS Khosravifar, S., Afsharikia, Z., and Schwartz, C. W. (Jun. 2015). Standardizing the Light Weight Deflectometer for Compaction Quality Assurance and Verification of the Design Intent. Airfield and Highway Pavements Conference, Transportation and Development Institute (T&DI) of ASCE, Miami, FL. (Presentation) Khosravifar, S., Afsharikia, Z., and Schwartz, C. W. (Jun. 2015). Evaluation of Resilient Modulus Prediction Models for Cohesive and Non-cohesive Soils. Airfield and Highway Pavements Conference, Transportation and Development Institute (T&DI) of ASCE, Miami, FL. No. 123 Khosravifar, S., Farzaneh, A., Haider, I., and Schwartz, C. W. (Jan. 2015). Advantages of Non-Symmetric Sigmoidal Function in Construction of Dynamic Modulus Master Curves of Asphalt Mixtures. Transportation Research Board 94rd Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers. Washington, DC. No. 15- 5615. Khosravifar, S., Haider, I., and Schwartz, C. W. (Jan. 2014). Application of Time-Temperature Superposition Principle in Prediction of Cumulative Plastic Strain in Repeated Load Permanent Deformation Tests. 2014 Transportation Research Board 93rd Annual Meeting. Washington, DC. No. 14- 5450. (Presentation) Khosravifar, S., Schwartz, C. W., and Goulias, D. G. (Jun. 2013). Time‐Dependent Stiffness Increase of Foamed Asphalt Stabilized Base Material. Ninth International Conference on the Bearing Capacity of Roads, Railways, and Airfields (BCRRA), Trondheim, Norway. pp. 939-948. Khosravifar, S., Schwartz, C. W., and Goulias, D. G. (Jun. 2013). Foamed Asphalt Stabilized Base Material: A Case Study. Airfield and Highway Pavements Conference, Transportation and Development Institute (T&DI) of ASCE, Los Angeles, CA. pp. 106-117. Khosravifar, S., Asefzadeh, A., and Schwartz, C. W. (Feb. 2013). Increase of Resilient Modulus of Unsaturated Granular Materials. ASCE GeoCongress, San Diego, CA. pp. 434-443. Khosravifar, S., Schwartz, C. W., and Goulias, D. G. (Jan. 2013). Mechanistic Structural Properties of Foamed Asphalt Stabilized Base Materials. Transportation Research Board 92nd Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers. Washington, DC. No. 13-2544-1. Page 151 of 159 Page 67 of 73 Khosravifar, S., and Schwartz, C. W. (Apr 2012). Stiffening Process of Foamed Asphalt Stabilized Base Material. Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists (AAPT) 87th annual meeting, Austin, TX. (Presentation) Khosravifar, S., Goulias, D. G., and Schwartz, C. W. (Mar. 2012). Laboratory Evaluation of Foamed Asphalt Stabilized Base Materials. ASCE GeoCongress, Oakland, CA. pp. 1592-1601. AWARDS Student Scholarship Award, Iranian American Academics and Professionals, Dec. 2015 Future Industry Leader Spotlight Award, American Road and Transportation, Sep. 2014 Builders Association (ARTBA) – Women Leaders Awards. Future Faculty Program Fellowship Award, UMD, College Park., Jan. 2013 2nd Place Best Graduate‐Master Poster, Kirlin Poster Review Day, UMD, College Park., Apr. 2012 Young Leaders Scholarship, National Asphalt Pavement Association (NAPA), Jul. 2010 A. JAMES CLARK DEAN FELLOWSHIP, SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING, UMD, COLLEGE PARK., 2009 – 10 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATION Transportation Research Board: Member of AFD80: Standing Committee on Strength and Deformation Characteristics of Pavement Sections, Apr. 2016 – Apr. 2019 Transportation Research Board: Member of AFP60: Standing Committee on Engineering Behavior of Unsaturated Geomaterials, Apr. 2016 – Apr. 2019 Society of Women Engineers: UMD chapter: Student Member, 2011 – 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE): Student Member, 2011 – 2015 Page 152 of 159 Page 68 of 73 EDUCATION MS, Civil Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL, 2015 BS, Civil Engineering, California Baptist University, Riverside, CA, 2013 LICENSE Fundamentals of Engineering, California, EIT 148437 EXPERIENCE SUMMARY Mr. Mwumvaneza has been involved in several pavement testing, analysis and management projects. He has conducted pavement evaluations involving manual and automated pavement condition surveys, and he has implemented pavement management systems for airports, cities and counties. Mr. Mwumvaneza has also conducted structural pavement testing using both Dynatest HWD and FWD for different counties and airports. Prior to joining Dynatest, Mr. Mwumvaneza worked at the Illinois Center for Transpo rtation (ICT) laboratory where he worked on pavement sustainability; and developing test methods for assessing materials used in construction of transportation facilities. He also involved in R&D projects with Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT). SIGNIFICANT PROJECT-RELATED EXPERIENCE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION Mr. Mwumvaneza has implemented pavement management systems and performed PCI surveys for airside and landside pavements for Fort Carson army base, Fort Riley army base, and The Yakima Training Center- Joint Base Lewis-McChord. In addition, he has implemented PAVERTM, generated multi-year pavement engineering recommendations for airfield and landside pavements, developed pavement deterioration models, and investigated probable failure mechanisms for observed pavement deterioration. ROADWAY AND PARKING LOTS PAVEMENT EVALUATION Mr. Mwumvaneza was involved in several semi-automated pavement condition surveys and PAVERTM implementation projects including: more than 1000 lane miles of roadway pavements in Illinois, Texas, North Carolina, Kansas and Florida. Data collection included 2D/3D pavement downward imaging, right of way images and pavement profile data. In addition, he developed GIS maps for each roadway section tested. PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL TESTING REHABILITATION DESIGN Mr. Mwumvaneza has extensive experience with non-destructive pavement testing equipment including the Falling Weight Deflectometer (H/FWD). He involved in different projects that assess the existing structural capacity of different pavement structures, determining pavement remaining life; and provided rehabilitation design recommendations. These projects include but not limited to Long Beach Airport pavement structure evaluation, CA, North Dakota Statewide FWD Testing, ND and Assessment of Structural Capacity of Flooded Roads and Non-Flooded Roads in Brazoria County, TX. VINCENT MWUMVANEZA STAFF ENGINEER Page 153 of 159 Page 69 of 73 R27-125: IDOT PROJECT Mr. Mwumvaneza was involved in Sustainable Aggregates Production–Green Applications for Aggregate Byproducts in the state of IL. This was IDOT sponsored project with objective of finding application area, where huge amount of aggregate by-products can be utilized. Mr. Mwumvaneza worked on the first phase of this project and helped in the developing the overall recommendation to the IDOT. PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Member, Transportation Research Board Member, Young Professionals in Transportation Member, American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Member, International Society of Concrete Pavements (ISCP) PUBLICATIONS Mwumvaneza, V., (2015). Pavement Sustainability Optimization Using Quarry By-Products and Geosynthetics. M.S. thesis. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL. Mwumvaneza, V., Wenting, H., Tutumluer, E., Ozer, H., Al-Qadi, I. L., Beshears. S., (2014). Characterization and Stabilization of Quarry By-products for Sustainable Pavement Applications, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. Wenting, H., Mwumvaneza, V., Ozer, H., Tutumluer, E., (2015). Framework for Sustainability Assessment of Aggregate Production in the U.S. Using Life-Cycle Inventory Assessment Approach. ASCE T&DI Airfield and highway pavement conference, Miami, Florida. Tutumluer, E., Ozer, H., Wenting, H., Mwumvaneza, V., (2015). Sustainable Aggregates Production: Green Applications for Aggregate By-Products. Federal Highway Administration Report (FHWA-ICT-15-012). Qamhia, I., Cheung, J., Wenting, H., Mwumvaneza, V., Tutumluer, E., (2015). Gradation Effects on the Strength Properties of Cement and Fly Ash Stabilized Quarry By-products Geo-Chicago 2016: Sustainability, Energy, and the Geoenvironment Chicago, IL, August 14-18, 2016 (submitted for review). Page 154 of 159 Page 70 of 73 7 REFERENCES 7.1.1 References within the Last Two Years 1) Dynatest Reference State of Texas Texas Department of Transportation Contact: Dr. Magdy Mikhail, P.E., Director TxDOT MNT Division Pavement Preservation Section Address: Texas Department of Transportation MNT Division, Pavement Preservation Section 125 E. 11th Street Austin, TX 78701-2483 TEL: (512) 832-7210 Email: Magdy.Mikhail@txdot.gov 2) Dynatest Reference City of Wichita Falls Contact: Ms. Teresa Rose, P.E. Deputy Director of Public Works Address: City of Wichita Falls, Department of Public Works P.O. Box 1431 Wichita Falls, TX 76307 TEL: (940) 761-7477 Email: teresa.rose@wichitafallstx.gov 3) Dynatest Reference City of Frisco, Texas Contact: Paul Knippel, Director of Engineering Service Address: City of Frisco George A. Purefoy Municipal Center 6101 Frisco Square Blvd, 3rd Floor Frisco, Texas 75034 TEL: (972) 292-5810 Email: pknippel@friscotexas.gov 4) Dynatest Reference Cook County, Illinois Contact: Salvatore LaMarca, P.E Highway Engineer Address: Cook County, Department of Transportation and Highways 69 W. Washington Suite 2300 Chicago, Illinois 60602 TEL: (312) 603-1700 Email: Salvatore.LaMarca@cookcountyil.gov Page 155 of 159 Page 71 of 73 5) Dynatest Reference Village of Schaumburg, Illinois Contact: David Lawry, Director of Engineering & Public Works Address: City of Schaumburg 101 Schaumburg Court Schaumburg, IL 60193 TEL: (847) 923-6600 Email: dlawry@ci.schaumburg.il.us 6) Project Manager Reference for Reuben Williams (with previous firm at time) City of McKinney Contact: Paul Sparkman, Assistant Director of Public Works Address: City of McKinney Pavement Management Services, 1550 S. College St. Building A McKinney, TX. 75069 TEL: (972) 547-7351 Email: psparkman@mckinneytexas.org 7.1.2 References from 2-5 Years 1) Dynatest Reference Prince George’s County, Maryland Contact: Mr. Haitham A. Hijazi Address: 9400 Peppercorn Drive, Suite 300 Largo, MD, 20774 TEL: (301) 883-5600 Email: hahijazi@co.pg.md.us 2) Dynatest Reference City of Hamilton, Ohio Contact: Mr. Patrick Yingling, PE, City Engineer Address: Department of Public Works One Renaissance Center 345 High Street, 5th Floor Hamilton, Ohio 45011 TEL: (513) 785-7280 yinglinp@ci.hamilton.oh 3) Project Manager Reference for Reuben Williams (with previous firm at time) City of San Antonio, Texas Contact: Anthony Chukwudolue, P.E., Assistant Director Address: City of San Antonio Pavement Management Services Municipal Plaza Building 114 W. Commerce, 6th Floor San Antonio, TX 78205 Tel: (210) 207-8165 Email: Anthony.Chukwudolue@sanantonio.gov Page 156 of 159 Page 72 of 73 4) Project Manager Reference for Reuben Williams (with previous firm at time) City of Austin, Texas Contact: Veena Prabhakar, P.E., Engineer B Address: City of Austin, Pavement Data Collection Services Street and Bridge Division Public Works Department 4411-A Meinardus Drive Austin, TX 78744 Tel: (512)-974-8745 Email: Veena.Prabhakar@austintexas.gov 5) Project Manager Reference for Reuben Williams (with previous firm at time) City of Tyler, Texas Contact: Adrienne Leach, P.E., Project Engineer Address: City of Tyler Pavement Management Services 423 W. Ferguson Tyler, Texas 75702 Tel: (903) 531-1135| Email: aleach@tylertexas.com Page 157 of 159 EXHIBIT B: FEE SCHEDULE KPA DYNATEST TOTAL 1. Project Mangement & Coordination 39,680.00$ 27,460.00$ 67,140.00$ 2. Overall PCI & Inventory City Roadway Infrastructure 62,020.00$ 121,160.00$ 183,180.00$ 3. Development of Five Year Street Maintenance Plan (SMP)78,060.00$ 66,100.00$ 144,160.00$ BASIC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TOTAL 179,760.00$ 214,720.00$ 394,480.00$ ADDITIONAL SCOPE ITEMS: 1. Citywide Asset Inventory -$ 138,592.00$ 138,592.00$ -$ 138,592.00$ 138,592.00$ 533,072.00$ Subconsultants: Dynatest - Data Collection/Street Inventory/Pavement Condition Index Pavement Conditions Survey and 5 Year Street Maintenance Plan (SMP) Summary of Professional Services Fee September 25, 2017 COST SUMMARY Summary of Hours ADDITIONAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TOTAL TOTAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SUMMARY Page 1 of 2 Page 158 of 159 EXHIBIT B: FEE SCHEDULE Principal Project Manager Project Engineer Graduate Engineer (EIT) Senior Eng Tech (CAD) Eng Tech (CAD)Clerical Fee Schedule 200.00$ 160.00$ 135.00$ 105.00$ 85.00$ 75.00$ 55.00$ 1. Project Mangement & Coordination a.Project Coordination with Dynatest 24,310.00$ 24 28 36 48 18 48 202 b.Project Kick Off Meeting 2,320.00$ 2 2 4 4 4 4 20 c.Meeting #2 - Review Initial Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Scores 2,400.00$ 4 4 4 4 16 d.Meeting #3 - Field Audit to Review PCI Scores 1,410.00$ 2 2 2 4 10 e.Meeting #4 - Review Preliminary Work Plan & Draft Report 1,410.00$ 2 2 2 4 10 f.Meeting #5 - Review Final Work Plan & Report 2,610.00$ 4 4 4 6 18 g.Presentation of Preliminary Work Plan & Report (GTAB & Council Meeting) 2,610.00$ 4 4 4 6 18 h.Presentation of Final Work Plan & Report (GTAB & Council Meeting) 2,610.00$ 4 4 4 6 18 Subtotal Project Management/Coordination 39,680.00$ 46 50 60 82 22 52 0 312 2. Overall PCI & Inventory City Roadway Infrastructure a.Develop initial strategies 3,780.00$ 4 4 8 12 28 b.Review all data developed in data collection phase 5,400.00$ 1 4 12 28 45 c.Organize data into segments within the City 7,990.00$ 4 8 28 18 24 82 d.Develop graphical representation of data collected 8,190.00$ 6 8 24 18 28 84 e.Identify locations below PCI of 85 8,810.00$ 6 12 40 8 18 84 f.Inventory roadway infrastructure 6,000.00$ 12 24 8 44 g.Review locations below PCI of 85 5,180.00$ 2 4 12 24 42 h.Develop exhibits illustrating PCIs 7,660.00$ 2 6 8 18 18 24 76 i.Review questionable PCIs with City 2,230.00$ 2 4 8 2 16 j.Complete overall PCI and roadway infrastructure inventory 6,780.00$ 4 4 8 18 12 18 64 Subtotal Overall PCI & Inventory City Roadway Infrastructure 62,020.00$ 15 54 108 200 74 112 2 565 3. Development of Five Year Street Maintenance Plan (SMP) a.Organize deficient streets into geographical areas 6,340.00$ 2 6 10 12 12 18 60 b.Develop rehabilitation methods and alternatives 4,880.00$ 6 8 10 10 34 c.Develop technical specifications and recommendations for rehabilitation alternatives 7,830.00$ 8 8 18 24 58 d.Develop projects for sustainability in bidding and construction 7,950.00$ 6 6 8 18 12 24 74 e.Organize projects and develop graphical representation 6,150.00$ 4 4 8 12 12 18 58 f.Prepare cost estimates for all projects 9,830.00$ 8 8 18 28 8 12 82 g.Review projects and rehabilitation methods with City Staff 2,400.00$ 4 4 4 4 16 h.Develop five year SMP projects with graphical representation and cost estimates 13,280.00$ 8 8 16 32 24 32 8 128 i.Produce preliminary draft for five year SMP 9,200.00$ 8 8 12 18 12 18 8 84 j.Prepare final five year SMP Plan & Report 6,700.00$ 6 6 6 12 8 18 8 64 k.Prepare Presentation for GTAB & Council Meeting for final five year SMP Plan 3,500.00$ 4 4 6 6 2 6 28 Subtotal Development of Five Year Street Maintenance Plan (SMP)78,060.00$ 64 70 116 176 90 146 24 686 Total Fee Principal Senior Engineer Project Engineer Graduate Engineer (EIT) Senior Eng Tech (CAD) Eng Tech (CAD)Clerical TOTAL 1. Project Mangement & Coordination 39,680.00$ 46 50 60 82 22 52 0 312 2. Overall PCI & Inventory City Roadway Infrastructure 62,020.00$ 15 54 108 200 74 112 2 565 3. Development of Five Year Street Maintenance Plan (SMP) 78,060.00$ 64 70 116 176 90 146 24 686 179,760.00$ 125 174 284 458 186 310 26 1,563 Summary of Labor & Associated Cost TOTAL Pavement Conditions Survey and 5 Year Street Maintenance Plan (SMP) Summary of Professional Services Fee Estimate by Employee/Position Category September 25, 2017 Kasberg, Patrick & Associates, LP (KPA) Total Fee Summary of Hours TOTAL Scope Items KPA Page 2 of 2 Page 159 of 159