HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda_GTAB_10.09.2020-CAPITALNotice of Meeting for the Georgetown Transportation Adv isory B oard -- C AP I TAL I MP RO VE ME N T S AD VI SORY C O MMI T T E E of the City of Georgetown October 9, 2020 at 8:30 AM at VI RT U AL T he C ity o f G eorgetown is c o mmitted to c ompliance with the Americans with Dis ab ilities Ac t (ADA). If yo u req uire as s is tanc e in participating at a p ublic meeting d ue to a disability, as d efined und er the ADA, reasonable as s is tance, ad ap tatio ns , or acc o mmo d ations will b e provid ed up o n req uest. P leas e contac t the C ity S ecretary's O ffic e, at leas t three (3) d ays p rio r to the s cheduled meeting date, at (512) 930-3652 or C ity Hall at 808 Martin Luther King Jr. S treet, G eo rgeto wn, T X 78626 for ad d itional info rmation; T T Y us ers route thro ugh R elay Texas at 711. Geor ge town Transportation A dvi sor y B oar d - Capital Impr ove me nts A dvisor y C ommi ttee M embe r s: Shei la M i ll s - Chair, D an J ones - Vice C hair, E rc el B r ashe ar, Geor ge B rown, J ames H ougnon, B r yan H utchinson, M i chael M iles, R obe r t R edoute y, A nge l a N e wman, J ohn Tatum, Ste phen A shloc k, A dib K hour y C onsiste nt wi th Gove rnor Gre g A bbott’s suspension of vari ous pr ovisions of the O pe n M e eti ngs A c t, effe ctive A ugust 1, 2020 and until further notice , to r educ e the c hanc e of C O V I D -19 tr ansmi ssion, all C i ty of Geor getown A dvisor y B oard C ommitte e me e ti ngs wi ll be he ld vir tual ly. P ubli c c omment will be all owe d via te le confe re nc e ; no one will be all owe d to appe ar in per son. To partic ipate: To join fr om a P C , M ac , i P ad, i P hone or A ndr oid de vic e ple ase cl ic k this U R L : https://ge or ge towntx.zoom.us/j/93878323459? pwd=c U 9 Q U TV J a U x L bXV sc mx Q R U V D O U 1 Zdz09 P assc ode : 669708 D e scr iption: R egular monthly vir tual me eting O r join by phone : Dial(for hi ghe r quality, dial a number based on your c urr ent loc ation): U S : +1 346 248 7799 or +1 669 900 6833 or +1 253 215 8782 or +1 929 205 6099 or +1 301 715 8592 or +1 312 626 6799 or 833 548 0282 (Toll F r e e ) or 877 853 5257 (Tol l F r ee ) or 888 475 4499 (Toll F r e e ) or 833 548 0276 (Toll F r ee ) Webi nar I D : 938 7832 3459 P assc ode : 669708 Page 1 of 276 C itizen c omments ar e ac ce pte d in thr ee di ffer ent for mats: 1. Submi t wr itte n c omments to she i la.mitc he ll@geor ge town.org by 12:00p.m. the day prior to the date of the mee ting and the R e cor ding Se cr etar y wil l r ead your comme nts i nto the r ec ording dur ing the ite m that i s being di sc usse d. 2. L og onto the me eti ng at the li nk above and “r aise your hand” dur ing the item. 3. Use your home/mobile phone to cal l the toll-fre e number. To join a Zoom mee ting, clic k on the l ink provided and joi n as an atte ndee . You will be asked to enter your name and email addr e ss (this is so we c an ide ntify you whe n you are call e d upon). To spe ak on an ite m, c li ck on the “Raise your H and” option at the bottom of the Zoom me e ti ng webpage onc e that ite m has ope ne d. When you ar e cal le d upon by the R ec ording S ec re tar y, your de vi c e wi ll be re mote ly un-muted by the A dmini str ator and you may spe ak for thr ee mi nutes. P le ase state your name clear l y, and whe n your time is over, your devic e will be mute d again. U se of pr ofani ty, thre atening l anguage, slande rous r e mar ks or thre ats of harm ar e not all owe d and will r e sult i n your being imme di atel y re moved from the me e ting. Regular Session (T his R egular S es s ion may, at any time, be rec es s ed to c o nvene an Exec utive S es s ion for any purp o s e authorized b y the O pen Meetings Ac t, Texas G o vernment C ode 551.) A C all to O rd er -- S heila Mills, C hair B Disc ussio n o n how the "Virtual" conferenc e will b e c o nducted , inc luding optio ns fo r pub lic comments and ho w the p ublic may address the C ommittee. -- Wes ley Wright, P.E., S ys tems Engineering Direc to r C Intro d uc tio n o f S taff & Vis itors -- S heila Mills , C hair D C ons id eratio n and p o s s ib le ac tion to app ro ve the March 13, 2020 and S eptemb er 11, 2020 minutes of the C apital Improvements Ad visory C ommittee meeting. -- S heila K. Mitc hell, C o mmittee Liaison E P resentation, d is cus s io n and p o s s ib le rec ommend ation for comments on Imp act F ee s ervic e areas, land us e assumptio ns , proposed capital impro vement p lan, and stakeho ld er engagement p lan. -- Wesley Wright, P.E., S ys tems Engineering Direc tor P LE AS E N OT E : Items no t covered o n the pos ted agenda will b e dis c us s ed and /or acted up o n at the next sc hed uled meeting o f the committee. Adjournment Ce rtificate of Posting Page 2 of 276 I, R obyn Dens mo re, C ity S ec retary for the C ity of G eorgetown, Texas, do hereb y certify that this Notice of Meeting was p o s ted at C ity Hall, 808 Martin Luther King Jr. S treet, G eorgeto wn, T X 78626, a p lace readily acc es s ib le to the general p ublic as req uired by law, on the _____ day of _________________, 2020, at __________, and remained so p o s ted fo r at leas t 72 c o ntinuo us hours prec eding the sc heduled time of s aid meeting. __________________________________ R o b yn Dens more, C ity S ecretary Page 3 of 276 City of Georgetown, Texas Transportation Advisory Board October 9, 2020 S UB J E C T: Dis cus s io n on ho w the "Virtual" c o nference will be cond uc ted, includ ing o p tions for p ublic c o mments and how the p ublic may ad d res s the C o mmittee. -- Wes ley Wright, P.E., S ystems Engineering Directo r IT E M S UMMARY: F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: N/A S UB MIT T E D B Y: S KM Page 4 of 276 City of Georgetown, Texas Transportation Advisory Board October 9, 2020 S UB J E C T: C o nsideration and pos s ible actio n to ap p rove the Marc h 13, 2020 and S ep tember 11, 2020 minutes o f the C ap ital Impro vements Advis o ry C o mmittee meeting. -- S heila K. Mitchell, C ommittee Liais o n IT E M S UMMARY: R eview and ap p ro ve the March 13, 2020 and S eptemb er 11, 2020 minutes o f the C ap itol Improvements Advis o ry C o mmittee meeting. F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: . S UB MIT T E D B Y: S KM AT TAC H ME N T S: D escription Type March 13, 2020 DRAFT Minutes Backup Material September 11, 2020 DRAFT Minutes Backup Material Page 5 of 276 Minutes of the Georgetown Transportation Advisory Board – CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ADVISORY COMMITTEE of the City of Georgetown March 13, 2020 at 8:30 AM at GMC Building, 300-1 Industrial Avenue, Georgetown, TX 78626 The City of Georgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If you require assistance in participating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the ADA, reasonable assistance, adaptations, or accommodations will be provided upon request. Please contact the City Secretary's Office, at least three (3) days prior to the scheduled meeting date, at (512) 930-3652 or City Hall at 808 Martin Luther King Jr. Street, Georgetown, TX 78626 for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. Georgetown Transportation Advisory Board - Capital Improvements Advisory Committee Members: Sheila Mills, Ercel Brashear, George Brown, James Hougnon, Bryan Hutchinson, Dan Jones, Michael Miles, Robert Redoutey, Angela Newman, John Tatum, Stephen Ashlock, Adib Khoury Present: Robert Redoutey, Sheila Mills, James “Jim” Hougnon, John Tatum, Stephen Ashlock, Adib Khoury, Dan Jones, Michael Miles Absent: Ercel Brashear, George Brown, Bryan Hutchinson, Angela Newman Staff: Wesley Wright, Wayne Reed, Sheila Mitchell Visitors: Jake Gutekunst & Clarissa Bruns – Kimley-Horn and Associates, citizens: Carl Norris, Larry Brundage, John Milford Regular Session – Called to order at 8:30am by Wright (This Regular Session may, at any time, be recessed to convene an Executive Session for any purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code 551.) A Call to Order -- Wesley Wright, P.E., Systems Engineering Director B Introduction of Committee, Staff & Visitors -- Wesley Wright, P.E., Systems Engineering Director Wright introduced staff. All committee members introduced and gave brief background about themselves. C Public Wishing to Address the Committee On a subject that is posted on this agenda: Please fill out a speaker registration form which can be found on the table at the entrance to the Committee Meeting. Clearly print your name and the letter of the item on which you wish to speak and present it to the Staff Liaison, prior to the start of the meeting. You will be called forward to speak when the Committee considers that item. Only persons who have delivered the speaker form prior to the meeting being called to order may speak. On a subject not posted on the agenda: Persons may add an item to a future Regular scheduled Committee agenda by filing a written request with the Staff Liaison no later than one week prior to the Committee meeting. The request must include the speaker’s name and the specific topic to be addressed with sufficient information to inform the board and the public. Only those persons who have submitted a timely request will be allowed to speak. To contact the Staff Liaison, please email sheila.mitchell@georgetown.org . -- No persons signed up to address the Committee. D Discussion on Committee Purpose, Process and Schedule -- Wesley Wright, P.E., Systems Engineering Director Page 6 of 276 PLEASE NOTE: Items not covered on the posted agenda will be discussed and/or acted upon at the next scheduled meeting of the committee. Wright gave overview of committee purpose, presented schedule and noted expectations. Questions: ◼ Do these fees need to be approved by the Council? E Nominations and election of Committee Chair and Vice Chair -- Wesley Wright, P.E., Systems Engineering Director Committee suggested Mills for Chair. Nomination by Jones, seconded by Miles to elect Sheila Mills as Chair of Committee. Approved 8-0-4 (Brashear, Brown, Hutchinson, Newman absent) Committee suggested Jones for Vice Chair. Nomination by Adib, seconded by Miles to elect Dan Jones for Vice Chair of Committee. Approved 8-0- (Brashear, Brown, Hutchinson, Newman absent) F Presentation and discussion on Thoroughfare Impact Fees. -- Wesley Wright, P.E., Systems Engineering Director Jake Gutekunst of Kimley-Horn made presentation on concepts of impact fees and reminded committee they are the Capital Improvements Advisory Committee (CIAC) however since COG has another CIAC in our terminology, all materials will refer to the committee as the Impact Fee Advisory Committee (IFC). Impact Fees are covered under State Local Government Code, Chapter 395. A full study will be provided to the committee at a future meeting. Questions/Comments: ◼ Can you be on the committee and not live inside the COG? ◼ Georgetown Development Alliance breakfast meeting – March 26th ◼ Are there instances where a city requires developments to make improvements and/or install traffic signals? ◼ Do funds get encumbered into a particular area? ◼ Is there a time frame to expend the funds? ◼ Can the fees go up above the max, determined by the study? ◼ The map indicates certain area where growth is different, therefore different fees will be assigned to those areas? 7 of the 9 zones qualify for fees. Lake Georgetown does not qualify; owned by Corp of Engineers but is annexed into the City. ◼ How do you deal with large developments, such as Costco, HEB, etc. to determine what their fees should be? ◼ If developers donate land for ROW access, will that be considered in the impact fee assessment? ◼ Since these are public meetings, is the public allowed to come participate and ask questions? ◼ Will these fees apply to current projects under construction, or projects permitted to go to construction? Re: TIAs ◼ Concerns for making sure fees are presented up front to help developers better determine project costs and also avoid duplication of fees. ◼ Wayne added a comment regarding the upcoming Public Hearings, encouraging and welcoming committee members, especially a member of the development community, to be present at Council meetings during the Public Hearings and show support of the impact fee update process; to be a voice on behalf of the committee and the board, noting the transparency and fairness of the process. G Presentation, discussion and possible recommendation on Impact Fee service areas, land use assumptions, and proposed capital improvement plan. -- Wesley Wright, P.E., Systems Engineering Director No discussion or action taken at this meeting; will be on future agenda. Adjournment Motion by Miles, seconded by Jones to adjourn at 9:49am. Page 7 of 276 Minutes of the Meeting for the Georgetown Transportation Advisory Board – CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ADVISORY COMMITTEE of the City of Georgetown September 11, 2020 at 8:30 AM at VIRTUAL The City of Georgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If you require assistance in participating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the ADA, reasonable assistance, adaptations, or accommodations will be provided upon request. Please contact the City Secretary's Office, at least three (3) days prior to the scheduled meeting date, at (512) 930 -3652 or City Hall at 808 Martin Luther King Jr. Street, Georgetown, TX 78626 for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. Georgetown Transportation Advisory Board - Capital Improvements Advisory Committee Members: Sheila Mills - Chair, Dan Jones - Vice Chair, Ercel Brashear, George Brown, James Hougnon, Bryan Hutchinson, Michael Miles, Robert Redoutey, Angela Newman, John Tatum, Stephen Ashlock, Adib Khoury Consistent with Governor Greg Abbott’s suspension of various provisions of the Open Meetings Act, effective August 1, 2020 and until further notice, to reduce the chance of COVID -19 transmission, all City of Georgetown Advisory Board Committee meetings will be held virtually. Public comment will be allowed via teleconference; no one will be allowed to appear in person. To participate: To join from a PC, Mac, iPad, iPhone or Android device please click this URL: https://georgetowntx.zoom.us/j/96684868068? pwd=SWFPbXJrMVVSZ1EvWTVKelNqQmxHZz09 Webinar ID: 966 8486 8068 Passcode: 936538 Description: Meeting starts at 8:30 a.m. Attendees can begin logging in at 8:00 a.m. Or join by phone: Dial toll free: (833)548-0276, (833)548-0282, (877)853-5257, or (888)475-4499 Page 8 of 276 Webinar ID: 966 8486 8068 Passcode: 936538 (NOTE: Toll Free numbers may not be available; please use alternate numbers if needed): Dial (for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location): (346)248-7799, (253)215-8782, (669)900-6833, (301)715-8592, (312)626- 6799 or (929)205-6099 Citizen comments are accepted in three different formats: 1. Submit written comments to sheila.mitchell@georgetown.org by 12:00p.m. the day prior to the date of the meeting and the Recording Secretary will read your comments into the recording during the item that is being discussed. 2. Log onto the meeting at the link above and “raise your hand” during the item. 3. Use your home/mobile phone to call the toll-free number. To join a Zoom meeting, click on the link provided and join as an attendee. You will be asked to enter your name and email address (this is so we can identify you when you are called upon). To speak on an item, click on the “Raise your Hand” option at the bottom of the Zoom meeting webpage once that item has opened. When you are called upon by the Recording Secretary, your device will be remotely un-muted by the Administrator and you may speak for three minutes. Please state your name clearly, and when your time is over, your device will be muted again. Use of profanity, threatening language, slanderous remarks or threats of harm are not allowed and will result in your being immediately removed from the meeting. Present: Dan Jones – Vice Chair, Robert Redoutey, James “Jim” Hougnon, John Tatum, Stephen Ashlock, Adib Khoury, Michael Miles, Ercel Brashear, George Brown, Bryan Hutchinson, Angela Newman Absent: Sheila Mills - Chair Staff: Wesley Wright, Wayne Reed, Ray Miller, Lua Saluone, Karen Frost, Sheila Mitchell Page 9 of 276 Visitors: Jake Gutekunst – Kimley-Horn and Associates; citizens: David Glenn, M. Fisher Regular Session (This Regular Session may, at any time, be recessed to convene an Executive Session for any purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code 551.) A Call to Order – Called to order at 8:32AM by Dan Jones, Vice Chair B Discussion on how the "Virtual" conference will be conducted, including options for public comments and how the public may address the Committee. -- Wesley Wright, P.E., Systems Engineering Director Karen Frost explained virtual etiquette regarding microphones, muting/unmuting, please speak individually, and use “raise hand feature”. Wright welcomed questions from committee during the presentations. Thanked everyone for their patience with virtual meeting format. C Introduction of Staff & Visitors – Dan Jones, Vice Chair None announced due to virtual meeting environment. D Review/Refresh of Committee Purpose, Proce ss and Schedule -- Wesley Wright, P.E., Systems Engineering Director PLEASE NOTE: Items not covered on the posted agenda will be discussed and/or acted upon at the next scheduled meeting of the committee. Wright gave quick overview to remind all of purpose of committee and process to meet requirements of state law. E Consideration and possible action to approve the March 13, 2020 minutes of the Capital Improvements Advisory Committee meeting. -- Sheila K. Mitchell, Committee Liaison No action due to time allowance for meeting. Mitchell will place item on October agenda for consideration and possible action. F Presentation and discussion on Transportation Impact Fees. -- Wesley Wright, P.E., Systems Engineering Director Gutekunst reviewed process for speaking using “raise hand feature” and welcomed questions. Since the committee last met in March, he noted plan to review Impact Fees 101 included in presentation to remind all of how transportation impact fees work as well as study assumptions regarding growth (land use assumptions) and projects (capital improvements plan - CIP). He noted the Stakeholder Engagement Plan which will occur over the next several months to involve stakeholders and the community including various groups, leading up to any adoption of fees, should council choose to adopt. Two Public Hearings will occur with the first one set for October 27 th. Future meetings will cover rate scenarios and preparing the ordinance as well as committee and board recommendation to be presented to council for possible adoption. Committee will meet monthly through January 2021. Plan for recommendation to Council after January meeting with proposed adoption in Spring 2021. Gutekunst continued with History of Study and presentation included in agenda packet. Page 10 of 276 Reminded the process falls under Chapter 395 of Texas Local Government Code. Reminder Transportation Impact Fees cannot be collected in areas located outside the city limits. Some discussion occurred regarding Impact Fees and Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) and how they differ as well as what areas they cover and what type of developments fall into each. Discussion regarding properties outside of city limits, located in the ETJ (extra- territorial jurisdiction), and how this affects them when they are annexed into the city; will visit about this while drafting o rdinance/policy. Projections cover a ten-year period. Reviewed components, allowed by law, that can and cannot be paid for, through an impact fee program. Some discussion occurred regarding funding sources for projects and some sources overlapping. Committee would like future clarification; staff and consultant will include information in future presentations for discussion. Future meetings will cover how fees are assessed for sites, what components are included when calculating the maximum fees, and the collections rates. Impact Fee calculations must be updated at least every five years. Gutekunst reviewed Land Use Assumptions (growth) projections as well as Capital Improvement Plan (projects for roadways and intersections) included in the Draft Study in the agenda packet. The Full Study will be reviewed in October. He reminded everyone about the Stakeholder Engagement opportunities and reviewed timeline again for Public Hearings and recommendations by Committee and Board to Council, per requirements of process. Wright noted that future meetings will allow for discussion on projects to be included or excluded. Concern was stated for the possibility for future committee meeting allowing more time for the committee to discuss and review. Wright noted consideration is being made for this and potential for the regular GTAB board meeting, which follows the committee meeting, to start at a later time. It was asked if a synopsis of what the debt would look like if the committee does not recommend an impact fee, could be given? Wright noted those discussions will be covered in November/December. Wright also noted March minutes (Item E) will be placed on the October agenda. No further discussion. G Presentation, discussion and possible recommendation for comments on Impact Fee service areas, land use assumptions, proposed capital improvement plan, and stakeholder engagement plan. – Wesley Wright, P.E., Systems Engineering Director No discussion or action taken at this meeting; will be on future agenda. Adjournment Motion by Brashear, seconded by Brown. Meeting adjourned at 9:50AM. Page 11 of 276 City of Georgetown, Texas Transportation Advisory Board October 9, 2020 S UB J E C T: P res entation, dis c us s ion and possible recommendatio n fo r c o mments on Impac t F ee service areas , land use as s umptions , p ro p o s ed c ap ital imp ro vement plan, and s takeholder engagement plan. -- Wes ley Wright, P.E., S ystems Engineering Directo r P LE AS E N O T E: Items not c o vered o n the p o s ted agend a will be d is cus s ed and/o r ac ted upon at the next s ched uled meeting of the c o mmittee. IT E M S UMMARY: F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: . S UB MIT T E D B Y: AT TAC H ME N T S: D escription Type 2020-10-9-CIAC_LUA_CIP_Rd2 Backup Material Letter to Wilco regarding Local Match Backup Material 3-2020_Georgetown_Roadway_Impact_Fees_DRAFT_PRE-CREDIT Backup Material Page 12 of 276 1 Transportation Impact Fees IFAC Meeting: Land Use Assumptions & Capital Improvements Plan Comments October 9, 2020 Page 13 of 276 22 Presentation Overview •(Item E) Study Assumptions •Land Use Assumptions (LUA or “Growth”) •Capital Improvements Plan (TIF eligible) •Feedback and Discussion Page 14 of 276 33 Service AreasDiscussed at November 26, 2019 Council Meeting –no comments Page 15 of 276 44 Impact Fee Components: Land Use Assumptions •Consistent with recently updated Comprehensive Plan •Establishes Infrastructure Demands and Master Plans •Population and Employment Projections •Aggressive vs. Non-aggressive Growth Rates •Calibrated with historical growth •Coordinate with Future Land Use More on this topic in Item E Page 16 of 276 55 Impact Fee: Capital Improvements Plan* •Components that can be paid for through an impact fee program: ✓Construction cost of capital improvements on the CIP ▪Roadway to thoroughfare standard ▪Traffic signals, bridges, sidewalks, etc. ✓Survey and Engineering fees ✓Land acquisition costs, including court awards ✓Debt Service of impact fee CIP ✓Study/Update Costs •Components that cannot be paid for through an impact fee program: 6 Projects not included in the CIP 6 Repair, operation and maintenance of existing or new facilities 6 Upgrades to serve existing development 6 Administrative costs of operating the program *Impact Fee CIP is different from annual CIP City prepares More on this topic in Item E Page 17 of 276 6 ITEM E –LUA & CIP (POSSIBLE ACTION) Page 18 of 276 77 Land Use Assumptions (City Limits) •Projecting 15,506 residential units of growth 2020-2030 •Includes single family and multifamily –about 1,320 units per year of single family and 330 units per year (1 complex) multifamily •Note: Lake Georgetown and Downtown are not shown, will have $0 fee in these Service Areas. Service Area Year Residential (Units) Employment (Sq. Ft.) Single Family Multi- Family Basic Service Retail Total A 2020- 2030 2,720 680 180,000 800,000 710,000 1,690,000 B 838 209 64,800 510,000 510,000 1,084,800 C 1,080 270 108,000 648,000 396,000 1,152,000 D 1,502 376 21,600 310,000 350,000 681,600 E 1,090 273 -430,000 430,000 860,000 F 2,094 524 25,200 576,000 360,000 961,200 SC 3,880 970 -324,000 360,000 684,000 Total 13,205 3,301 400,000 3,600,000 3,120,000 7,113,600 Page 19 of 276 88 10 Year Growth Units by Service Area Service Area A Res: 3,400 DU Non-Res: 1.7M Sq. Ft. Service Area D Res: 1,878 DU Non-Res: 0.7M Sq. Ft. Service Area C Res: 1,350 DU Non-Res: 1.1M Sq. Ft. Note: Lake Georgetown and Downtown are not shown, will have $0 fee in these Service Areas. Service Area Sun City Res: 4,851 DU Non-Res: 0.7M Sq. Ft. Service Area F Res: 2,618 DU Non-Res: 1.0M Sq. Ft. Service Area E Res: 1,363 DU Non-Res: 0.9M Sq. Ft. Service Area B Res: 1,047 DU Non-Res: 1.1M Sq. Ft. Page 20 of 276 99 Types of Projects -Roadways •Previously Constructed –Identified corridors that were previously constructed and have excess capacity for future development to utilize. •Widening –Existing roadways not currently built to the ultimate class in the Transportation Master Plan and must be completely reconstructed. •Access Management –Existing undivided roadways identified for median construction in the existing center turn lane for access management purposes. •New -All future roadways needed to complete the Transportation Master Plan. Page 21 of 276 1010 Types of Projects -Intersections •Signal –either a new signal or modification to an existing signal •Roundabout –a new roundabout intersection •Turn Lane –addition or extension of a turn lane •Overpass –identified new grade separated crossings in TMP •Innovative –construction of an intersection improvement to be determined after complete analysis including special high capacity intersections •Other (ITS System Upgrades) –identified by staff and was split evenly between the nine (9) service areas Page 22 of 276 1111 Service Area A Project List Page 23 of 276 1212 Service Area A Map Page 24 of 276 1313 Service Area B Project List Page 25 of 276 1414 Service Area B Map Page 26 of 276 1515 Service Area C Project List Page 27 of 276 1616 Service Area C Map Page 28 of 276 1717 Service Area D Project List Page 29 of 276 1818 Service Area D Map Page 30 of 276 1919 Service Area E Project List Page 31 of 276 2020 Service Area E Map Page 32 of 276 2121 Service Area F Project List Page 33 of 276 2222 Service Area F Map Page 34 of 276 2323 Service Area Sun City Project List Page 35 of 276 2424 Service Area Sun City Map Page 36 of 276 2525 Service Area Downtown Map No Impact Fee in this Area due to lack of CIP Projects. Page 37 of 276 2626 Service Area Lake Georgetown Map No Impact Fee in this Area due to lack of CIP Projects. Page 38 of 276 2727 LUA & CIP Summary •Total growth is highest in Service Area A •Lowest growth in Service Area B (more built-out) •Impact Fee CIP Total Cost -$602 Million •Includes OTP projects and some past projects with debt service still being paid off •Draft report attached as backup for review prior to public hearing to make a motion on study assumptions (LUA, CIP chapters only –full report later) Highest growth Lowest growth Page 39 of 276 2828 Georgetown Mobility Bond 2021 Projects •Previous comment on “double counting” in Bond Projects and Impact Fee Study: •Impact Fees only account for a portion of project costs (see pie chart on next slide) •If a bond project passes for 2021, then any impact fee revenues used for the project would reduce debt issuance needed by the City and keep the tax rate from increasing to cover the anticipated debt issuance from the 2021 bond. In short, impact fee dollars help with debt capacity and don’t make the project 100% dependent on existing taxpayers. •The credit calculation is specifically designed to account for future taxes that would be used to pay off the roadways Page 40 of 276 2929 Impact Fee Components: Collection Rate Page 41 of 276 30 DISCUSSION & POSSIBLE ACTION Page 42 of 276 3131 What’s Next? •Possible Action: comments on LUA and/or CIP? •October 27th –Public Hearing on LUA & CIP •Comments due from IFAC by October 13th •November –January –IFAC meetings on collection rate & Policy decisions •(September –December): Stakeholder Engagement •January –return to set Public Hearing on Adopting Study •(January –Complete): Ordinance drafting with collection rate & policy (IFAC will submit comments on Study & recommendation) Page 43 of 276 Page 44 of 276 Page 45 of 276 Page 46 of 276 Page 47 of 276 Page 48 of 276 Page 49 of 276 Page 50 of 276 CITYOFGEORGETOWN,TEXAS TRANSPORTATIONIMPACTFEESTUDY PRE-CREDITREPORT March 2020 PreparedfortheCityofGeorgetown Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Jake Gutekunst, P.E. Jeff Whitacre, P.E., AICP, PTP 10814 Jollyville Rd, Suite 200 Austin, TX 78759 Phone 512 418 1700 TBPE Firm Registration Number: F-928 Project Number: 069226615 © Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Page 51 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT i Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................1 I.INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................7 II.LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS ...................................................................................................9 A.Purpose and Overview ..................................................................................................................... 9 B.Land Use Assumptions Methodology ............................................................................................ 11 C.Transportation Impact Fee Service Areas ................................................................................... 13 D.Land Use Assumptions Summary.................................................................................................... 15 III.TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN ..................................16 IV.METHODOLOGY FOR TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES .................................................34 A.Service Areas .................................................................................................................................... 34 B.Service Units ...................................................................................................................................... 34 C.Cost Per Service Unit ....................................................................................................................... 36 D.Cost of the TIF CIP ........................................................................................................................... 36 1.Overview of TIF CIP Costing Worksheets .......................................................................................... 37 2.Project Information ................................................................................................................................. 38 3.Construction Pay Items ........................................................................................................................... 39 4.Construction Component Allowances ................................................................................................... 39 5.Summary of Cost and Allowances ....................................................................................................... 40 E.Summary of Roadway Impact Fee CIP Costs ............................................................................. 40 F.Service Unit Calculation .................................................................................................................. 48 V.TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE CALCULATION ..............................................................54 A.Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit .................................................................... 54 B.Plan for Financing and the Ad Valorem Tax Credit .................................................................. 57 C.Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Determination ....................................................................... 58 D. Service Unit Demand Per Unit of Development ........................................................................... 60 VI.SAMPLE CALCULATIONS ..................................................................................................66 VII.ADOPTION AND ADMINISTRATION OF ROADWAY IMPACT FEES .................................67 A.Adoption Process .............................................................................................................................. 67 B.Collection and Use of Transportation Impact Fees .................................................................... 67 VIII.CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................................................................68 APPENDICES .................................................................................................................................69 A.Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections ................................................................................... 69 B.Transportation Impact Fee CIP Service Units of Supply ........................................................... 69 C.Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory .......................................................................................... 69 D.Plan for Awarding the Street Impact Fee Credit Summary .................................................... 69 E.Plan for Awarding the Street Impact Fee Credit Supporting Exhibits ................................... 69 Page 52 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT ii List of Exhibits 1 Proposed Service Areas ..................................................................................................................... 14 2 10-Year Transportation Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan Service Area A ............................................................................................................................. 19 Service Area B .............................................................................................................................. 21 Service Area C ............................................................................................................................. 23 Service Area D ............................................................................................................................. 25 Service Area E .............................................................................................................................. 26 Service Area F .............................................................................................................................. 27 Service Area SC ........................................................................................................................... 33 List of Tables 1 Residential and Employment 10-Year Growth Projections .......................................................... 12 2 10-Year Transportation Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan Service Area A ............................................................................................................................. 18 Service Area B .............................................................................................................................. 20 Service Area C ............................................................................................................................. 22 Service Area D ............................................................................................................................. 24 Service Area E .............................................................................................................................. 26 Service Area F .............................................................................................................................. 28 Service Area SC ........................................................................................................................... 32 3A Service Volumes for Proposed Facilities .......................................................................................... 35 3B Service Volumes for Existing Facilities .............................................................................................. 35 4 10-Year Transportation Impact Fee CIP with Conceptual Level Cost Projections Service Area A ............................................................................................................................. 41 Service Area B .............................................................................................................................. 42 Service Area C ............................................................................................................................. 43 Service Area D ............................................................................................................................. 44 Service Area E .............................................................................................................................. 45 Service Area F .............................................................................................................................. 46 Service Area SC ........................................................................................................................... 47 5 Transportation Demand Factor Calculations ................................................................................... 51 6 Ten Year Growth Projections ............................................................................................................. 53 Page 53 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction Impact Fees are a mechanism for funding the public infrastructure necessitated by new development. Across the country, they are used to fund police and fire facilities, parks, schools, roads and utilities. In Texas, the legislature has allowed their use for water, wastewater, roadway and drainage facilities. Since 1996, they have been used to fund public water and wastewater improvements in the City of Georgetown. For the purposes of this study, the term “Transportation Impact Fee” is meant to construe applicable requirements for “roadway impact fees” in state law. In the most basic terms, impact fees are meant to recover the incremental cost of the impact of each new unit of development creating new infrastructure needs. In the case of Transportation Impact Fees, the infrastructure need is the increased capacity on arterial and collector roadways that serve the overall transportation system. The purpose of the 2019 Transportation Impact Fee Study is to identify the fee per unit of new development necessary to fund these improvements in accordance with the enabling legislation, Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code. Impact Fees are a mathematical calculation that determines a maximum impact fee that would be equivalent for growth paying for growth. The Maximum Transportation Impact Fee per Service Unit for Roadway Facilities is considered an appropriate measure of the impacts generated by a new unit of development on the City's Roadway System. An impact fee program is anticipated to be designed so that it is predictable for both the development community and City. An impact fee program is equitable since similar developments pay a similar fee regardless if they are the first or last to develop. An impact fee program is transparent.This report describes in detail how the fee is calculated and how a Capital Improvement Advisory Committee, referred to as an Impact Fee Advisory Committee (IFAC) in this report and by the City of Georgetown, monitors the Impact Fee program. An impact fee program is flexible in that funds can be used on priority projects and not just on projects adjacent to a specific development. An impact fee program is consistent with other City goals and objectives for growth. For example, the actual collection rate set by Council may be determined to be less than the Maximum Transportation Impact Fee to achieve and be in alignment with other City goals and objectives for growth. Page 54 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 2 Impact Fee Basics Transportation Impact Fees are determined by several key variables, each described below in greater detail. Impact Fee Study The 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study is to determine the maximum impact fee per unit of new development chargeable as allowed by the state law. This determination is not a recommendation; the actual fee amount ultimately assessed is at the discretion of the Georgetown City Council, so long as it does not exceed the maximum assessable fee allowed by law. The study looks at a period of 10 years to project new growth and corresponding capacity needs, as required by state law. The study and corresponding maximum fees must be restudied at least every five years. However, the study can be updated at any time to accommodate significant changes in any of the key variables of the impact fee equation. Service Areas A Service Area is a geographic area within which a unique maximum impact fee is determined. All fees collected within the Service Area must be spent on eligible improvements within the same Service Area. For Transportation Impact Fees, the Service Area may not exceed 6 miles. In Georgetown, this restriction necessitated the creation of 9 separate Service Areas. A map of the Service Areas can be found on Page 14. In defining the Service Area boundaries, the project team considered the corporate boundary, required size limit, adjacent land uses, highway facilities, and topography. Since each Service Area has a unique maximum impact fee, the per-unit maximum fee for an identical land use will vary from one Service Area to the next. For this reason, the team avoided drawing a Service Area boundary through uniform land uses where possible. Land Use Assumptions The Impact Fee determination is required to be based on the projected growth and corresponding capacity needs in a 10-year window. This study considers the years 2020-2030. Acknowledging Page 55 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 3 that the parameters of the study (the corporate boundaries, Transportation Plan, Comprehensive Plan, zoning maps, platting history, etc.) are changing constantly, this study is based on conditions as they were on July 31, 2019. One of the key elements in the determination of the impact fee is the amount of new development anticipated over 10 years. The residential and non-residential growth projections were performed using the City of Georgetown’s draft Comprehensive Plan growth projections and compared with the historical building permit data and development pipeline anticipated projects. Transportation Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan The Transportation Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan (TIF CIP) is distinct and separate from the City’s traditional Capital Improvements Plan (CIP). The TIF CIP is a list of projects eligible for funding through impact fees. The City’s Overall Transportation Plan (OTP) is the plan for the infrastructure that is estimated to be necessary to accommodate the expected growth. Only those capacity improvements included in the City’s OTP are included in the TIF CIP. Capacity improvements may include the addition of lanes, intersection improvements, or the extension of a new road. Resurfacing or other maintenance activities do not qualify as capacity improvements under impact fee law in Texas and cannot be funded with Transportation Impact Fees. The cost of the TIF CIP is one of the fundamental factors in the calculation of the per-unit maximum impact fee. The TIF CIP’s cost was calculated through systematic evaluation of each eligible project. The project team visited each project site to determine the project scope, the presence of any special conditions (such as the need for significant drainage improvements or railroad crossings) and whether various additional construction costs were applicable (such as costing for significant grades). In determining project limits, the team identified roadway segments with uniform need. For example, DB Wood Rd was previously constructed from Williams Drive to the Public Safety Operations and Training Center as a 4-lane divided using previous transportation bond dollars, while a portion of the roadway is a 4-lane undivided with a center turn lane recommended for access management, and the remainder of DB Wood Dr to W University Avenue is shown as a widening to a 4-lane divided roadway from the existing 2-lane undivided section. These were split as three separate projects based on uniform need. Developing unit costs from recently City bid projects and TxDOT Page 56 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 4 moving average bid prices, uniform costs were determined for the major items of work, additional construction items, and project delivery costs. Section III provides a listing of the 10-Year TIF CIP by service area in Tables 3.A – 3.F and maps of the TIF CIP by service area in Exhibits 4.A – 4.F. Note, the Downtown and Lake Georgetown Service Areas do not have a 10-year TIF CIP because these areas of town were determined to not have an Impact Fee administered due to the lack of TIF eligible CIP projects. Finally, detailed cost projections by project can be found in Appendix A. It should be noted that these cost projections are based on conceptual level planning and are subject to refinement upon final design. Only those projects listed in the TIF CIP are eligible to utilize impact fee funds. In order to optimize future flexibility, all capacity improvements included in the Overall Transportation Plan are included in the TIF CIP and will be eligible to utilize impact fee funds. In some cases, an interim project designation was used due to the ultimate build out not being needed in the 10-year window. An example of this is Westinghouse Rd east of FM 1460, which is shown as a 4-lane divided road widening in the TIF CIP, but ultimately will be built out to a 6-lane divided road based on the Overall Transportation Plan. Only the costs associated with providing the additional capacity necessitated by 10 years of growth can be used to calculate the maximum impact fee. To calculate the maximum impact fee, the total cost of the TIF CIP at build-out was reduced to account for (1) the portion of new capacity that will address existing needs, (2) the portion of new capacity that will not be necessitated until beyond the 10-year growth window, and (3) contributions already made by current developments. A ratio that compares 10 years’ demand for capacity to the net supply of capacity (total new capacity in the TIF CIP minus existing needs) can be calculated. That ratio, which may not exceed 100%, is then applied to the cost of the net capacity supplied. The result is a determination of the costs attributable to the next 10 years’ growth, which is then used to calculate the maximum impact fee in accordance with state law. The result is known as the recoverable cost of the TIF CIP. Page 57 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 5 Service Unit The “service unit” is a measure of consumption or use of the capital facilities by new development. In other words, it is the unit of measure used in the 2019 Transportation Impact Fee Study to quantify the supply and demand for roads in the City. For transportation purposes, the service unit is defined as a vehicle-mile. The definition for vehicle-mile is as follows: a vehicle-mile is the capacity consumed in a single lane in the PM peak hour by a vehicle making a trip one mile in length. The PM Peak is used as the basis for transportation planning and the estimation of trips caused by new development. Impact Fee Calculation In simplest terms, the maximum impact fee allowable by law is calculated by dividing the recoverable cost of the TIF CIP by the number of new service units of development. In accordance with state law, both the cost of the TIF CIP and the number of new service units of development used in the equation are based on the growth and corresponding capacity needs projected to occur within a 10-year window. This calculation is performed for each service area individually; each service area has a stand-alone TIF CIP and 10-year growth projection. In practice, there are many factors that complicate this calculation. The maximum impact fee allowable by law for each service area is calculated in Table 8. A detailed discussion of the calculation precedes Table 8, found on Page 59. Collection and Use of Transportation Impact Fees Transportation Impact fees are assessed when a final plat is recorded. The assessment defines the impact of each unit at the time of platting, according to land use, and may not exceed the maximum impact fee allowed by law. An existing plat would be assessed at the adoption of the ordinance and would be exempt from impact fees for one year. Transportation Impact Fees are collected when a building permit is issued. Therefore, funds are not collected until development-impacts are introduced to the transportation system. Funds collected within a service area can be used only within the same service area. Finally, fees must be utilized within 10 years of collection in the designated service area, or must be refunded with interest. Fees should be utilized in a first in, first out basis. Page 58 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 6 Adoption Process Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code stipulates a specific process for the adoption of Roadway Impact Fees. A Capital Improvements Advisory Committee, called an “Impact Fee Advisory Committee” (IFAC) for this report, is required to review the Land Use Assumptions and TIF CIP used in calculating the maximum fee, and to provide the Committee’s findings for consideration by the City Council. The IFAC also reviews the Transportation Impact Fee ordinance and provides its findings to the City Council. The composition of the IFAC is required to adequately represent the building and development communities. The City Council then conducts a public hearing on the Land Use Assumptions, TIF CIP and Impact Fee Ordinance. Two public hearings are required for the 2020 Transportation Impact Fee study, one for Land Use Assumptions and TIF CIP, and another for the Impact Fee Calculation and Ordinance. Following policy adoption, the IFAC is tasked with advising the City Council of the need to update the Land Use Assumptions or the TIF CIP at any time within five years of adoption. Finally, the IFAC oversees the proper administration of the Impact Fee, once in place, and advises the Council as necessary. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Pre-Credit Results Below is the listing of the 2020 PRE-CREDIT Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit (Vehicle-Mile): Service Area Maximum Fee Per Service Unit (per Vehicle-Mile) A $1,410 B $1,733 C $2,639 D $1,176 E $2,501 F $3,696 SC $1,046 Page 59 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 7 I.INTRODUCTION Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code describes the procedure political subdivisions must follow to create and implement impact fees. Chapter 395 defines an Impact Fee as “a charge or assessment imposed by a political subdivision against new development to generate revenue for funding or recouping the costs of capital improvements or facility expansions necessitated by and attributable to the new development.” The City has retained Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. to provide professional transportation engineering services for the 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study. This report includes details of the Transportation Impact Fee calculation methodology in accordance with Chapter 395, the applicable Land Use Assumptions, development of the Transportation Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan (TIF CIP), and the Land Use Vehicle-Mile Equivalency Table. This report references two of the basic inputs to the Roadway Impact Fee: 1)Land Use Assumptions (Pg. 9) 2)Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan (TIF CIP) (Pg. 16) Information from these Land Use Assumptions and TIF CIP is used extensively throughout the remainder of the report. There is a detailed discussion of the methodology for the computation of impact fees. This discussion is broken into three components: 1)Methodology for Transportation Impact Fees (Pg. 34) 2)Transportation Impact Fee Calculation (Pg. 54) 3)Plan for Financing and the Ad Valorem Tax Credit (Pg. 57) Page 60 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 8 The components of the Computation Method for Roadway Impact Fee include development of: ·Service Areas (Pg. 34) ·Service Units (Pg. 34) ·Cost Per Service Unit (Pg. 36) ·TIF CIP Costing Methodology (Pg. 36) ·Summary of TIF CIP Costs (Pg. 40) ·Service Unit Calculation (Pg. 48) The Transportation Impact Fee is then calculated as: ·Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit (Pg. 54) ·Service Unit Demand Per Unit of Development (Pg. 60) The report also includes a section concerning the Plan for Financing and the Ad Valorem Tax Credit. This involves the calculation of the applicable credit required by law to offset the City’s use of ad valorem taxes to help fund the TIF CIP. This plan will be prepared by NewGen Strategies and included in the Final Report. Page 61 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 9 II.LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS A.Purpose and Overview In order to assess an impact fee, Land Use Assumptions must be developed to provide the basis for residential and employment growth projections within a municipality. As defined by Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code, these assumptions include a description of changes in land uses, densities, and development in the service area. The land use assumptions are then used in determining the need and timing of transportation improvements to serve future development. This report documents the process used to develop the Land Use Assumptions for the City of Georgetown’s Transportation Impact Fee (TIF) study. In accordance with Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code, roadway (transportation) impact fees must be calculated based on reasonable expectations of residential and employment growth within the next ten years (2020 – 2030). Information from the following sources was compiled to complete the Land Use Assumptions: ·Overall Transportation Plan 2015 ·Georgetown Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Plan (November 2019 Draft) ·City of Georgetown Historical Building Permit Data 2012-2019 ·Williamson Central Appraisal District (WCAD) Parcel Data (current as of January 2020) ·City of Georgetown staff ·City of Georgetown Development Pipeline (9/30/2019 version) Page 62 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 10 This Land Use Assumptions Summary includes the following components: ·Land Use Assumptions Methodology – An overview of the general methodology used to generate the land use assumptions. ·Transportation Impact Fee Service Areas – Explanation of the division of Georgetown into service areas for roadway and infrastructure facilities. ·Residential and Employment Growth – Data on residential and employment growth within each service area over the next ten years (2020 – 2030). ·Land Use Assumptions Summary Table – A synopsis of the Land Use Assumptions. The residential and employment estimates and projections were compiled in accordance with the following categories: Units:Number of dwelling units, both single and multi-family. Employment: Square feet of building area based on three (3) different classifications. Each classification has unique trip making characteristics. Retail: Land use activities which provide for the retail sale of goods which primarily serve households and whose location choice is oriented toward the household sector, such as grocery stores and restaurants. Service: Land use activities which provide personal and professional services, such as government and other professional offices. Basic: Land use activities that produce goods and services such as those which are exported outside of the local economy, such as manufacturing, construction, transportation, wholesale, trade, warehousing, and other industrial uses. Page 63 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 11 The above categories in the Land Use Assumptions match those used to develop the travel demand model for the City of Georgetown. These broader categories are used in the development of the assumptions for impact fees; however, expanded classifications used in the assessment of impact fees are found in the Land Use / Vehicle-Mile Equivalency Table (Pg. 62). B.Land Use Assumptions Methodology The residential and non-residential growth projections formulated in this report were performed using reasonable and generally accepted planning principles. The following factors were considered in developing these projections: ·Character, type, density, and quantity of existing development; ·Emerging Projects; ·Historical growth trends Determination of the ten-year growth within the Transportation Impact Fee study area was accomplished through two general steps: ·Step 1: Determine Base Year (2020) ·Step 2: Determine 10-Year Growth Projections Step 1: Determine Base Year (2020) Data was collected from WCAD in January 2020, which included parcel data in GIS format, as well as land information, improvement information, and other property data in tabular format. Information collected in tabular format was associated to parcels based on a common parcel identification number and used to determine if a property was vacant, building square footage for occupied parcels, and land use based on state code. State codes were used to determine whether a property was single family residential, multifamily residential, retail, service or basic non-residential land use, and geographically assign the base year land use assumptions for each service area. A conversion of square footage per unit was utilized to determine the number of units for multifamily land uses based on average multifamily unit sizes. Page 64 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 12 Step 2: Determine 10-Year Growth Projections The November draft of the Future Land Use Plan in the 2020 Comprehensive Plan update was used to determine build-out conditions for the City of Georgetown. For the purposes of determining a 10-year window, it was assumed that 25% of the remaining growth to Build- Out in the City will occur in the next 10 years, with growth for 2020 to 2030 being determined by linear interpolation. Density of development used in the Comprehensive Plan and split of residential and non-residential land uses assumed for each Future Land Use were used to determine build out demographics. Build out residential units were broken out into a split of 20% multifamily units and 80% single family units based on historical data from 2000 to 2019 in the City of Georgetown. The 2030 projections were compared to historical building permit data from 2000 to 2019 and emerging projects in the development pipeline tracked by the City to calibrate growth projections from the Comprehensive Plan and validate the 10-year growth assumptions. From 2010 to 2019, 7,621 single family dwelling units were constructed and from 2010 to 2019, 3,550 multifamily units were constructed in the City of Georgetown. The average of the historical trends (assuming growth rate for historical years from 2010 to 2019 continues from 2020 to 2030), development pipeline projections and the Comprehensive Plan were used to determine growth projections. Finally, planned large non-residential projects were also added to the average of the Comprehensive Plan, development pipeline projections and historical trends to further calibrate the Land Use Assumptions shown in Table 1. Page 65 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 13 C. Transportation Impact Fee Service Areas The geographic boundary of the proposed impact fee service areas for transportation facilities is shown in Exhibit 1. The City of Georgetown is divided into nine (9) service areas, each based upon the six (6) mile limit, as required in Chapter 395. For transportation facilities, the service areas as required by state law are limited to areas within the current corporate City limits. In defining the Service Area boundaries, the project team considered the corporate boundary, required six (6) mile size limit, adjacent land uses, highways and topography. Since each Service Area will have a unique maximum impact fee, the per-unit maximum fee for an identical land use will vary from one Service Area to the next. For this reason the areas of uniform land use were contained within the same Service Area where possible. It should be noted that at locations where Service Area boundaries align with a City roadway, the proposed boundary is intended to follow the centerline of the roadway, unless otherwise noted. In cases where a Service Area boundary follows the City Limits, only those portions of the transportation facility within the City Limits are included in the Service Area. For example, if a Service Area Boundary follows the city limits, and one side of a transportation facility is in the City limits and the other is not, only 50% of the facility may be included in the TIF CIP. Another example is where the Service Area boundary follows the edge Right-of-Way for a transportation facility, but the Right-of-Way and other side of the transportation facility is out of the City Limits. In this case, 50% of the transportation facility is included in the TIF CIP. For intersection projects along a Service Area boundary, only the corners of the intersection that fall within a Service Area boundary are considered for inclusion in the respective Service Area. For example, if one corner of an intersection is outside of the City Limits, one corner is in one service area, and the remaining two corners are in another service area, the first service area would include 25% of the intersection project, and the second would include 50% of the intersection project. Page 66 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 14 Exhibit 1 – Proposed Service Areas Page 67 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 15 D.Land Use Assumptions Summary Table 1 summarizes the residential and employment 10-year growth projections. Note that the Downtown and Lake Georgetown Service Areas are not included as it has been determined that these areas will have no transportation impact fee. Table 1. Residential and Employment 10-Year Projections Service Area Year Residential (Units)Employment (Sq. Ft.) Single Family Multi- Family Basic Service Retail Total A 2020- 2030 2,720 680 180,000 800,000 710,000 1,690,000 B 838 209 64,800 510,000 510,000 1,084,800 C 1,080 270 108,000 648,000 396,000 1,152,000 D 1,502 376 21,600 310,000 350,000 681,600 E 1,090 273 -430,000 430,000 860,000 F 2,094 524 25,200 576,000 360,000 961,200 SC 3,880 970 -324,000 360,000 684,000 Total 13,205 3,301 400,000 3,600,000 3,120,000 7,113,600 Page 68 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 16 III.TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN The City has identified the transportation projects needed to accommodate the projected growth within the City. The City’s Overall Transportation Plan (OTP) is the plan for the infrastructure that is estimated to be necessary to accommodate the expected growth. The Transportation Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan (TIF CIP) consists of 4 categories of projects for roadway facilities as well as intersection projects described on Pg. 17 of this report. They are as follows: ·Previously Constructed – Identified corridors that were previously constructed and have excess capacity for future development to utilized. ·Widening – Existing roadways not currently built to the ultimate class in the Overall Transportation Plan and must be completely reconstructed ·Access Management – Existing 5 lane undivided roadways identified for median construction in the existing center turn lane for access management purposes. ·New - All future roadways needed to complete the Overall Transportation Plan The TIF CIP includes arterial class roadway facilities, collector facilities as well as major intersection improvements. Roadway facilities identified are included in the Overall Transportation Plan except for some roadway alignment modifications due to city direction and some collector widenings identified through discussion with City Staff. Some collector facilities were identified as being built by others through development agreements or other agencies such as Williamson County or TxDOT or being funded through other measures that would preclude inclusion in the TIF CIP. Through evaluation of the Overall Transportation Plan with City staff, some facilities were identified that were upgraded or downgraded from their functional classification to reflect capacity need in a 10-year window. Page 69 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 17 In addition to roadway facilities, major intersection improvements were identified by determining capacity needs through either turn lanes or improved traffic control measures based on Overall Transportation Plan functional classifications of intersecting roadways. Intersection Improvements were categorized as follows: ·Signal – either a new signal or modification to an existing signal due to construction of a new roadway approach to an existing signalized intersection ·Roundabout – a new roundabout intersection ·Turn Lane – addition or extension of a turn lane consistent with TxDOT lane length recommendations based on roadway classification ·Overpass – identified new grade separated crossings in OTP ·Innovative – construction of an intersection improvement to be determined after complete analysis. This includes improvements such as special intersections (Continuous Flow Intersections (CFI), Diverging Diamond Intersections (DDI), or grade separation improvements) ·Other (ITS System Upgrades) – This item was identified by City staff and was split evenly between the nine (9) service areas for developing the roadway impact fee. All intersection improvement recommendations are recommended to undergo a design level evaluation before implementation to ensure the most appropriate improvements are made. In the case where a design level evaluation determines improvements contrary to the TIF CIP, such as turn lane improvements in place of a signal, the TIF CIP cost allocated to the intersection may still be applied to the alternate improvements. The proposed TIF CIP is listed in Tables 2.A – 2.SC and mapped in Exhibits 2.A –2.SC.The tables show the length of each project as well as the facility’s typology. The TIF CIP was developed in conjunction with input from City of Georgetown staff and represents projects that will be needed to accommodate the growth projected in the Land Use Assumptions section of this report. Page 70 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 18 Table 2.A. 10-Year Transportation Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan – Service Area A Note: The 10-Year Transportation Impact Fee CIP is not in a prioritized order. Service Area Proj. #IF Class Roadway Limits Length (mi) % In Service Area A-1 4 Lane Major Arterial Shell Rd (1)Sh 195 Wb To 1200' S Of Sh 195 0.11 50% A-2 4 Lane Major Arterial Shell Rd (2)1200' S Of Sh 195 To 200' S Of Shell Stone Trl 0.09 100% A-3 4 Lane Major Arterial Shell Rd (3)200' S Of Shell Stone Trl To Scenic Oaks Dr 0.11 50% A-4 4 Lane Major Arterial Shell Rd (4)Scenic Oaks Dr To 2015' S Of Scenic Oaks Dr 0.38 100% A-5 4 Lane Major Arterial Shell Rd (5)2015' S Of Scenic Oaks Dr To 4315' S Of Scenic Oaks Dr 0.44 50% A-6 4 Lane Major Arterial Shell Rd (6)4315' S Of Scenic Oaks Dr To 4790' S Of Scenic Oaks Dr 0.09 100% A-7 4 Lane Major Arterial Shell Rd (7)4790' S Of Scenic Oaks Dr To 5170' S Of Scenic Oaks Dr 0.09 50% A-8 4 Lane Major Arterial Shell Rd (8)1870' S Of Shell Spur To 5170' S Of Scenic Oaks Dr 0.71 100% A-9 4 Lane Major Arterial Shell Rd (9)900' S Of Bowline Dr To 300' N Of Sycamore St 0.53 50% A-10 4 Lane Minor Arterial Berry Creek Dr Airport Rd To Sh 195 0.70 100% A-11 4 Lane Minor Arterial Airport Rd (1)Berry Creek Dr To 475' N Of Indian Mound Rd 0.11 100% A-12 4 Lane Minor Arterial Airport Rd (2)475' N Of Indian Mound Rd To 500' N Of Sanaloma Dr 0.69 50% A-13 4 Lane Minor Arterial Airport Rd (3)Cavu Rd To 300' S Of Vortac Ln 0.25 50% A-14 4 Lane Minor Arterial Airport Rd (4)300' S Of Vortac Ln To Lakeway Dr 0.95 100% A-15 4 Lane Collector Lakeway Dr Northwest Blvd To Airport Rd 1.13 100% A-16 4 Lane Major Arterial Shell Rd (10)500' N Of Bowline Dr To 200' N Of Sycamore St 0.36 50% A-17 4 Lane Major Arterial Shell Rd (11)300' N Of Sycamore St To 600' N Of Bellaire Dr 0.14 100% A-18 4 Lane Major Arterial Shell Rd (12)600' N Of Bellaire Dr To Verde Vista 0.72 100% A-19 4 Lane Collector Shell Rd (13)Verde Vista To 500' N Of Williams Dr 0.26 100% A-20 4 Lane Collector Verde Vista Williams Dr To 1500' E Of Williams Dr 0.28 100% A-21 3 Lane Collector Wildwood Dr Verde Vista Dr To Williams Dr 0.31 100% A-22; B-1 Access Management Williams Dr (2)400' N Of Bettie Mae Way To 1200' E Of Country Rd 2.04 50% A-23;B-2 Access Management Williams Dr (3)900' E Of La Paloma Dr To Country Rd 0.22 50% A-24; B-3 Access Management Williams Dr (4)Country Rd To S Ih 35 Sb 2.40 50% A-25 3 Lane Collector Lakeway Dr Whisper Oaks Ln To Williams Dr 0.38 100% A-26 4 Lane Minor Arterial Rivery Blvd Northwest Blvd To Williams Drive 0.53 100% Location Improvement(s) % In Service Area AI-1 Sh 195 And Shell Rd Innovative 25% AI-2 Berry Creek Dr And Sh 195 Signal 100% AI-3 Ih35/Sh195 Ramp And Frontage Turn Lane 50% AI-4 Ih35/Sh195 Ramp And Frontage Turn Lane 50% AI-5 Bellaire Drive And Shell Road Signal 50% AI-6 Luna Trail And Serenada Drive Turn Lane & Turn Lane 50% AI-7 Northwest Blvd And Serenada Dr Roundabout & Turn Lane 50% AI-8 N Ih 35 Frontage And Sh 130 Frontage Signal 50% AI-9;CI-1 N Ih 35 Frontage And Sh 130 Frontage Signal 50% AI-10 Wildwood Drive And Verde Vista Roundabout 25% AI-11 Verde Vista Drive And Shell Road Signal 100% AI-12;BI-1 Woodlake Drive And Williams Drive Turn Lane 50% AI-13;BI-2 Wildwood Drive And Williams Drive Turn Lane 50% AI-14;BI-3 Estrella Crossing And Williams Drive Signal & Turn Lane 50% AI-15;BI-4 Serenada Drive And Williams Drive Turn Lane 50% AI-16;BI-5 Williams Drive And Lakeway Drive Turn Lane 50% AI-17;BI-6 River Bend And Williams Drive Turn Lane 50% AI-18 Lakeway Drive And Northwest Blvd Roundabout 100% AI-19 Northwest Blvd And Golden Oaks Drive Roundabout 100% AI-20;CI-4 N Ih 35 And Northwest Blvd Overpass 50% AI-21 Its System Upgrades Other 17% SA A Inte rse ction Im pr ov ements Page 71 of 276 ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") A AI-1 AI-9;CI-1 AI-14;BI-3 AI-17;BI-6 AI-16;BI-5 AI-15;BI-4 AI-13;BI-2 AI-12;BI-1 AI-20;CI-4 A-16 A-24; B-3 A-23; B-2 A-22; B-1 N IH 35 C R 1 4 3 WILLIAMS DR S H 1 9 5 SERENADA DR SHELL RD AIRPORT RD L A K E W A Y D R S A N A L O M A D R N O R T H W E S T B L V D L U N A T R LVERDE VISTA SHELL RD N IH 35AIRPORT RD AI-6 AI-7 AI-5 AI-8 AI-4AI-3 AI-2 AI-19 AI-18 AI-11 A-9 A-7A-8 A-5 A-4 A-3 A-2 A-6 A-1 A-25 A-21 A-26 A-20 A-19 A-18 A-17 A-15 A-14 A-13 A-12 A-11 A-10 FONTANA DRIVE RIVER BEND DRIVE G O L D E N O A K S D RIV E W IL D W O O D D R AI-10 Legend ")INTERSECTION PROJECTS Segment Projects OTHE R OTP FACILITIES NEW - BY OTHERS ACCE SS PREVIOUSLY CONSTRUCTED NEW 2-LANE WIDEN 3-LANE WIDEN 4-LANE NEW 4-LANE 4-LA NE (1/2) WIDEN 6-LANE NEW 6-LANE 100-YR FEMA FLOOD PLAIN 0 1 20.5 Miles Georgetow n Transportation Impact Fee´Service Area AMarch 2020 PRE-CREDIT DRAFTPRE-CREDIT DRAFT Page 72 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 20 Table 2.B. 10-Year Transportation Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan – Service Area B Note: The 10-Year Transportation Impact Fee CIP is not in a prioritized order. Service Area Proj. #IF Class Roadway Limits Length (mi) % In Service Area A-22; B-1 Access Management Williams Dr (2)400' N Of Bettie Mae Way To 1200' E Of Country Rd 2.04 50% A-23;B-2 Access Management Williams Dr (3)900' E Of La Paloma Dr To Country Rd 0.22 50% A-24; B-3 Access Management Williams Dr (4)Country Rd To S Ih 35 Sb 2.40 50% B-4 Previously Constructed D B Wood Rd (1)Williams Dr To 1300' S Of Williams Dr 0.24 100% B-5 Access Management D B Wood Rd (2)1800' S Of Williams Dr To 3200' S Of Williams Dr 0.26 50% B-6 4 Lane Major Arterial D B Wood Rd (3)3200' S Of Williams Dr To Cedar Breaks Rd 1.29 50% B-7 4 Lane Major Arterial D B Wood Rd (4)Cedar Breaks Rd To W University Ave 1.89 100% B-8 3 Lane Collector Country Rd Williams Dr To 500' S Of Rustle Cv 0.39 50% B-9 3 Lane Collector Bootys Crossing Rd 400' W Of Pecan Ln To Williams Dr 1.11 100% B-10 4 Lane Collector Wolf Ranch Pkwy Rivery Blvd To Memorial Drive 1.39 100% B-11 3 Lane Collector Memorial Drive (1)Rivr Chase Blvd To Wolf Ranch Pkwy 0.39 100% B-12 4 Lane Collector Memorial Drive (2)Wolf Ranch Pkwy To Wolf Lakes Dr 0.29 100% B-13; D-3 6 Lane Major Arterial W Sh 29 (3)Wood Ct To Wolf Ranch Pkwy 0.75 50% B-14; D-4 6 Lane Major Arterial W University Ave Wolf Ranch Pkwy To Scenic Dr 0.97 50% Location Improvement(s) % In Service Area AI-12;BI-1 Woodlake Drive And Williams Drive Turn Lane 50% AI-13;BI-2 Wildwood Drive And Williams Drive Turn Lane 50% AI-14;BI-3 Estrella Crossing And Williams Drive Signal & Turn Lane 25% AI-15;BI-4 Serenada Drive And Williams Drive Turn Lane 50% AI-16;BI-5 Williams Drive And Lakeway Drive Turn Lane 50% AI-17;BI-6 River Bend And Williams Drive Turn Lane 50% BI-7 Db Wood Road And Cedar Breaks Drive Turn Lane & Turn Lane 75% BI-8;DI-1 Db Wood Road And Sh 29 (University) Signal 50% BI-9;DI-2 Scenic Drive And University Ave Turn Lane & Turn Lane 25% BI-10 Its System Upgrade Other 17% SA B I nte r se c tio n I m pr o v e ments Page 73 of 276 ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") BBI-7 BI-9 BI-8;DI-1 AI-14;BI-3 AI-17;BI-6 AI-16;BI-5 AI-15;BI-4 AI-13;BI-2 AI-12;BI-1 WILLIAMS DR D B WOOD RD S IH 35 W OLF RANC H PK W Y SCENIC DR RIVERY BLVD WILDWOOD DR COUNTRY RD WOODLAKE DR D B W O O D R D B-9 B-7 B-6 B-5 B-4 B-8 B-12B-11 B-10 B-14; D-4 A-24; B-3 B-13; D-3 A-23; B-2 A-22; B-1 M E M O R I A L D R I V E R I V E R C H A S E B L V D W UN IVER SITY AVE B O O TY S C R O S S IN G R D WIL D W O O D D R Legend ")INTERSEC TION PROJECTS Segment Projects OTHE R OTP FACILITIES NEW - BY OTHERS ACCE SS PREVIOUSLY CONSTRUCTED NEW 2-LANE WIDEN 3-LANE WIDEN 4-LANE NEW 4-LANE 4-LA NE (1/2) WIDEN 6-LANE NEW 6-LANE 100-YR FEMA FLOOD PLAIN 0 0.75 1.50.375 Miles Georgetow n Transportation Impact Fee´Service Area BMarch 2020 PRE-CREDIT DRAFTPage 74 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 22 Table 2.C. 10-Year Transportation Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan – Service Area C Note: The 10-Year Transportation Impact Fee CIP is not in a prioritized order. Service Area Proj. #IF Class Roadway Limits Length (mi) % In Service Area C-1 4 Lane Major Arterial Ne Inner Loop Ih 35 Nb To University Ave 3.12 100% C-2 4 Lane Minor Arterial Stadium Drive N Austin Ave To Ne Inner Loop 0.49 100% C-3 4 Lane Minor Arterial Stadium Drive Ne Inner Loop To 1470' E Of Ne Inner Loop 0.28 50% C-4 Access Management N Austin Ave Ne Inner Loop To Williams Drive 1.93 100% C-5 4 Lane Major Arterial Northwest Blvd N Ih 35 Fwy Nb To N Austin Ave 0.22 100% C-6 4 Lane Major Arterial Fm 971 (1)N Austin Ave To E Morrow St 0.63 100% C-7 4 Lane Major Arterial Fm 971 (2)E Morrow St To Sh 130 Sb 1.26 100% C-8;F-1 4 Lane Major Arterial E Sh 29 (1)Haven Street To 300' E Of Reinhardt Blvd 1.32 50% C-9 4 Lane Major Arterial E Sh 29 (2)300' E Of Reinhardt Blvd To 300' E Of Owen Cir 0.42 50% C-10;F-2 Access Management E Sh 29 (3)300' E Of Owen Cir To Sh 130 0.08 50% Location Improvement(s) % In Service Area AI-9;CI-1 N Ih 35 Frontage And Sh 130 Frontage Signal 50% CI-2 Cr 151 (Stadium Drive) And Austin Avenue Signal 100% CI-3 Inner Loop And Cr 151 (Stadium Drive) Roundabout 100% AI-20;CI-4 N Ih 35 And Northwest Blvd Overpass 50% CI-5 N Austin Ave And Fm 971 Signal 100% CI-6 N Austin Ave And Old Airport Rd Turn Lane & Signal 100% CI-7 Fm 971 And Cr 152 Signal 100% CI-8 S Austin Ave And 2Nd St Turn Lane 100% CI-9 Maple Street And Smith Creek Rd Signal 100% CI-10;FI-1 E University Ave And Hutto Rd Turn Lane 50% CI-11 Its System Upgrades Other 17% SA C Inte r se c tio n I mpro v e ments Page 75 of 276 ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") C CI-9 CI-8 AI-9;CI-1 CI-10;FI-1 AI-20;CI-4 C-9 C-8; F-1 C-10; F-2 S H 1 3 0 N IH 35 F M 9 7 1 C R 1 5 2 N AUSTIN AVE S H 2 9 NE INNER LOOP S T A D I U M D R I V E OLD AIRPORT RD E U N I V E R S I T Y A V E S COLLEGE ST C R 1 5 2 S H 1 3 0 NE INNER LOOP CI-7 CI-6 CI-5 CI-3 CI-2 C-7 C-6 C-5 C-4 C-2 C-3 C-1 E 2ND ST MA P L E S T N C O LLE G E ST R E ET PARKVIEW DRIVE Legend ")INTERSEC TION PROJECTS Segment Projects OTHE R OTP FACILITIES NEW - BY OTHERS ACCE SS PREVIOUSLY CONSTRUCTED NEW 2-LANE WIDEN 3-LANE WIDEN 4-LANE NEW 4-LANE 4-LA NE (1/2) WIDEN 6-LANE NEW 6-LANE 100-YR FEMA FLOOD PLAIN 0 0.7 1.40.35 Miles Georgetow n Transportation Impact Fee´Service Area CMarch 2020 PRE-CREDIT DRAFT Page 76 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 24 Table 2.D. 10-Year Transportation Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan – Service Area D Note: The 10-Year Transportation Impact Fee CIP is not in a prioritized order. Service Area Proj. #IF Class Roadway Limits Length (mi) % In Service Area D-1 6 Lane Major Arterial W Sh 29 (1)2500' E Of Gabriel Forest To 1000' E Of Wood Ranch Rd 1.47 50% D-2 6 Lane Major Arterial W Sh 29 (2)1000' E Of Wood Ranch Rd To Wood Ct 0.25 100% B-13; D-3 6 Lane Major Arterial W Sh 29 (3)Wood Ct To Wolf Ranch Pkwy 0.75 50% B-14; D-4 6 Lane Major Arterial W University Ave Wolf Ranch Pkwy To Scenic Dr 0.97 50% D-5 4 Lane Minor Arterial D B Wood Rd University Ave To Wolf Ranch Pkwy 0.28 100% D-6 4 Lane Minor Arterial Wolf Ranch Pkwy University Blvd To Southwest Byp 1.40 100% D-7 4 Lane Major Arterial Southwest Bypass (1)Wolf Ranch Pkwy To 3400' S Of Wolf Ranch Pkwy 0.63 100% D-8 4 Lane Major Arterial Southwest Bypass (2)3400' S Of Wolf Ranch Pkwy To 900' S Of Rocky Hill Dr 0.47 50% D-9 4 Lane Major Arterial Southwest Bypass (3)900' S Of Rocky Hill Dr To Leander Rd 0.25 100% D-10 4 Lane Major Arterial Rr 2243 (1)Limestone Creek Rd To River Ridge Dr 5.84 100% D-11 Access Management Rr 2243 (2)River Ridge Dr To Ih 35 1.09 100% D-12 2 Lane Major Arterial New Southwest Bypass W University Ave To Wolf Ranch Pkwy 0.54 100% Location Improvement(s) % In Service Area BI-8;DI-1 Db Wood Road And Sh 29 (University) Signal 50% BI-9;DI-2 Scenic Drive And University Ave Turn Lane & Turn Lane 25% DI-3 D B Wood Rd And Wolf Ranch Pkwy Signal 100% DI-4;EI-1 Scenic Drive And W 17Th St Roundabout 50% DI-5;EI-5 Leander Rd And Scenic Dr Signal 25% DI-6 Leander Road And Escalera Parkway Turn Lane 100% DI-7 W University Ave And Southwest Bypass Signal 100% DI-8 Its System Upgrades Other 17% SA D Inte rse c tio n I mpro ve ments Page 77 of 276 ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") D DI-5;EI-5 BI-8;DI-1 DI-4;EI-1 BI-9;DI-2 B-14; D-4B-13; D-3D-2 D-9 D-8 D-7 D-5 D-6 D-1 D-12 D-11 D-10 R R 2 2 4 3 W U N I V E R S I T Y A V E S W 2 LEANDER RD S IH 35 FRONTAGE S O U T H W E S T B Y P A S S W O L F R A N C H P K W Y D B W O O D R R 2 2 4 3 DI-7 DI-3 DI-6 S C E N I C D R I V E S O U T H W E S T B Y P A S S Legend ")INTERSECTION PRO JECTS Segment Projects OTHE R O TP FAC ILITIES NEW - BY OTH ERS ACCE SS PREVIOU SLY C ONS TRUC TED NEW 2-LAN E WIDEN 3-LANE WIDEN 4-LANE NEW 4-LAN E 4-LA NE (1/2) WIDEN 6-LANE NEW 6-LAN E 100-YR FEMA FLOOD PLAIN 0 0.8 1.60.4 Miles Georgetow n Transportation Impact Fee´Service Area DMarch 2020 PRE-CREDIT DRAFT Page 78 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 26 Table 2.E. 10-Year Transportation Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan – Service Area E Note: The 10-Year Transportation Impact Fee CIP is not in a prioritized order. Service Area Proj. #IF Class Roadway Limits Length (mi) % In Service Area E-1 Access Management Leander Rd Scenic Drive To Fm 1460 0.96 100% E-2 4 Lane Major Arterial S Austin Ave 18Th Street To Se Inner Loop 1.38 100% E-3 Previously Constructed Fm 1460 (1)Fm 1460 To 2900' S Of Old Fm 1460 0.25 100% E-4 Previously Constructed Fm 1460 (2)2900' S Of Fm 1460 To 4400' S Of Old Fm 1460 0.28 100% E-5 Previously Constructed Fm 1460 (3)200' S Of Se Inner Loop To 4400' S Of Old Fm 1460 0.42 100% E-6 Previously Constructed Fm 1460 (4)200' S Of Se Inner Loop To 1000' S Of Se Inner Loop 0.14 100% E-7 Previously Constructed Fm 1460 (5)1000' S Of Se Inner Loop To 1600' S Of Se Inner Loop 0.11 50% E-8 Previously Constructed Fm 1460 (6)1600' S Of Se Inner Loop To 500' N Of Naturita Dr 0.51 100% E-9 Previously Constructed Fm 1460 (7)500' N Of Naturita Dr To 600' S Of Naturita Dr 0.20 100% E-10 Previously Constructed Fm 1460 (8)600' S Of Naturita Dr To 400' S Of Midnight Ln 0.18 50% E-11 Previously Constructed Fm 1460 (9)400' S Of Midnight Ln To 1000' S Of Midnight Ln 0.09 50% E-12 Previously Constructed Fm 1460 (10)1000' S Of Midnight Ln To Westinghouse Rd 0.31 50% E-13 Previously Constructed Fm 1460 (11)Westinghouse Rd To 1800' S Of Westinghouse Rd 0.31 100% E-14 4 Lane Major Arterial Se Inner Loop (1)S Austin Ave To 600' W Of S Austin Ave 0.11 100% E-15 4 Lane Major Arterial Se Inner Loop (2)600' E Of S Austin Ave To 1800' E Of S Austin Ave 0.87 50% E-16 4 Lane Major Arterial Se Inner Loop (3)900' W Of Fm 1460 To Sam Houston Ave 0.57 100% E-17 4 Lane Collector Rabbit Hill Rd (2)700' N Of Commerce Blvd To 300' N Of Commerce Blvd 0.06 50% E-18 4 Lane Collector Rabbit Hill Rd (1)300' N Of Commerce Blvd To Westinghouse Rd 0.33 100% E-19 6 Lane Major Arterial Westinghouse Rd (1)S Ih 35 To 2000' E Of Mays St 1.10 100% E-20 6 Lane Major Arterial Westinghouse Rd (2)2000' E Of Mays St To 2500' E Of Mays St 0.09 50% E-21 6 Lane Major Arterial Westinghouse Rd (3)2500' E Of Mays St To 3000' E Of Mays St 0.11 100% E-22 6 Lane Major Arterial Westinghouse Rd (4)3600' E Of Mays St To 5800' E Of Mays St 0.40 50% E-23 6 Lane Major Arterial Westinghouse Rd (5)5800' E Of Mays St To 700' E Of Scenic Lake Dr 0.29 100% E-24 6 Lane Major Arterial Westinghouse Rd (6)700' E Of Scenic Lake Dr To Fm 1460 0.12 50% E-25 4 Lane Major Arterial Westinghouse Rd (7)Fm 1460 To Maple Street 0.72 100% E-26;F-3 4 Lane Collector Maple St (1)E 22Nd Street To Brittania Blvd 0.10 50% E-27;F-4 4 Lane Collector Maple St (2)Brittania Blvd To Se Inner Loop 0.91 50% E-28;F-5 4 Lane Collector Maple St (3)Se Inner Loop To Pinnacle Dr 0.78 50% E-29;F-6 4 Lane Collector Maple St (4)Pinnacle Dr To Westinghouse Rd 0.84 50% Location Improvement(s) % In Service Area DI-4;EI-1 Scenic Drive And W 17Th St Roundabout 50% EI-2 Railroad Ave And 17Th Street Signal 75% EI-3 W 17Th Street And S Austin Ave Signal & Turn Lane 75% EI-4 E 17Th St And S Church St Turn Lane 75% DI-5;EI-5 Leander Rd And Scenic Dr Signal & Turn Lane 50% EI-6 Austin Ave And Leander Rd Turn Lane 75% EI-7 Austin Ave And 21St Street Signal & Turn Lane 75% EI-8 S Main St And W 21St St Signal 75% EI-9 E 21St Street And Industrial Ave Roundabout 75% EI-10 Industrial Ave And Fm 1460 Signal 50% EI-11 Snead Drive (Blue Springs Rd) And Se Inner Loop Signal 50% EI-12;FI-2 Sam Houston Ave And Maple Street Innovative 50% EI-13;FI-3 Se Inner Loop And Maple Street Innovative 50% EI-14 La Conterra Blvd And Fm 1460 Signal 50% EI-15 Westinghouse Rd And Scenic Lake Dr Signal 100% EI-16 Westinghouse Rd And Fm 1460 Turn Lane 75% EI-17 Its System Upgrades Other 17% SA E I nter s ec tio n I mpr ove ments Page 79 of 276 ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") E EI-4EI-3EI-2 DI-5;EI-5 DI-4;EI-1 EI-13;FI-3 EI-12;FI-2 E-29;F-6 E-27;F-4 E-26;F-3 E-28;F-5 M A P L E S T F M 1 4 6 0 S AUSTIN AVE S IH 35 FRONTAGE W E S T I N G H O U S E R D M AYS STREET S E I N N E R L O O P R A B B I T H I L L R D R I D G E L I N E L E A N D E R R D W 21ST ST SCENIC LAKE DR O L D F M 1 4 6 0 N A T U R I T A D R COOPERATIVE WAY F M 1 4 6 0 W E S T I N G H O U S E R D E-9 E-8 E-7 E-6 E-5 E-4 E-3 E-2 E-1 E-25 E-22 E-12 E-23 E-21 E-11 E-24 E-20 E-19 E-18 E-14 E-10 E-17 E-16 E-15 E-13 EI-9EI-8EI-7 EI-6 EI-15 EI-16 EI-14 EI-11 EI-10 S C H U R C H S T Legend ")INTERSEC TION PROJECTS Segment Projects OTHE R OTP FACILITIES NEW - BY OTHERS ACCE SS PREVIOUSLY CONSTRUCTED NEW 2-LANE WIDEN 3-LANE WIDEN 4-LANE NEW 4-LANE 4-LA NE (1/2) WIDEN 6-LANE NEW 6-LANE 100-YR FEMA FLOOD PLAIN 0 0.7 1.40.35 Miles Georgetow n Transportation Impact Fee´Service Area EMarch 2020 PRE-CREDIT DRAFT Page 80 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 28 Table 2.F. 10-Year Transportation Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan – Service Area F Note: The 10-Year Transportation Impact Fee CIP is not in a prioritized order. Service Area Proj. #IF Class Roadway Limits Length (mi) % In Service Area C-8;F-1 4 Lane Major Arterial E Sh 29 (1)Haven Street To 300' E Of Reinhardt Blvd 1.32 50% C-10;F-2 Access Management E Sh 29 (2)300' E Of Owen Cir To Sh 130 0.08 50% E-26;F-3 4 Lane Collector Maple St (1)E 22Nd Street To Brittania Blvd 0.10 50% E-27;F-4 4 Lane Collector Maple St (2)Brittania Blvd To Se Inner Loop 0.91 50% E-28;F-5 4 Lane Collector Maple St (3)Se Inner Loop To Pinnacle Dr 0.78 50% E-29;F-6 4 Lane Collector Maple St (4)Pinnacle Dr To Westinghouse Rd 0.84 50% F-7 4 Lane Minor Arterial Se Inner Loop (1)University Ave To Rockride Ln 1.19 100% F-8 4 Lane Minor Arterial Se Inner Loop (2)Rockride Ln To Southwestern Blvd 0.27 50% F-9 4 Lane Minor Arterial Se Inner Loop (3)Southwestern Blvd To Maple Street 0.77 100% F-10 4 Lane Minor Arterial Southwestern Blvd (1)Raintree Dr To 1500' S Of Raintree Dr 0.28 100% F-11 4 Lane Minor Arterial Southwestern Blvd (2)1500' S Of Raintree Dr To Se Inner Loop 0.25 50% F-12 4 Lane Major Arterial Southwestern Blvd (3)Se Inner Loop To Sam Houston Ave 0.66 100% F-13 4 Lane Major Arterial Southwestern Blvd (4)Sam Houston Ave To Fairhaven Gtwy 0.60 100% F-14 4 Lane Major Arterial Southwestern Blvd (5)Fairhaven Gtwy To Westinghouse Rd 0.71 100% F-15 4 Lane Collector Rockride Ln (1)Se Inner Loop To Sam Houston Ave 0.76 100% F-16 4 Lane Collector Rockride Ln (2)Sam Houston Ave To 2200' S Of Sam Houston Ave 0.41 50% F-17 4 Lane Collector Rockride Ln (3)2200' S Of Sam Houston Ave To 2700' S Of Sam Houston Ave 0.09 100% F-18 4 Lane Minor Arterial Carlson Cove 1900' E Of Rock Ride Ln To Sam Houston Ave 1.01 100% F-19 4 Lane Major Arterial Patriot Way (1)Sh 130 Frontage To Sam Houston Ave 0.45 100% F-20 4 Lane Major Arterial Sam Houston (1)Southwestern Blvd To Patriot Way 1.77 100% F-21 2 Lane Major Arterial Sam Houston (2)Patriot Way To 2900' E Of Sh 130 Nb 1.15 100% F-22 4 Lane Minor Arterial Bell Gin Rd Sam Houston Ave To Westinghouse Rd 1.56 50% F-23 4 Lane Major Arterial Westinghouse Rd Maple St To Bell Gin Rd 1.83 50% Location Improvement(s) % In Service Area CI-10;FI-1 E University Ave And Hutto Rd Turn Lane 50% EI-12;FI-2 Sam Houston Ave And Maple Street Innovative 50% EI-13;FI-3 Se Inner Loop And Maple Street Innovative 50% FI-4 Southwestern Blvd And Se Inner Loop Signal & Turn Lane 75% FI-5 Rock Ride Lane And Se Inner Loop Signal 50% FI-6 Sh130 And Patriot Way Signal 100% FI-7 Sam Houston Ave And Southwestern Blvd Signal 100% FI-8 Sam Houston Ave And Rock Ride Ln Signal & Turn Lane 100% FI-9 Its System Upgrade Signal & Turn Lane 17% SA F I nterse c tio n Im pro v e me nts Page 81 of 276 ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") F S H 1 3 0 M A P L E S T S H 2 9 LAWHON LN PATRIOT WAY H U T T O R D SAM HOUSTON AVESE INNER LOOP S O U T H W E S T E R N B L V D R O C K R I D E L N E U N I V E R S I T Y A V E C H U R C H I L L F A R M S SE INNER LOOP F-7 F-8 F-9 F-11 F-10 F-16 F-21 F-22 F-17 F-14 F-20 F-23 F-13 F-18 F-19 F-15 F-12 F-5;E-28 F-4;E-27 C-8; F-1 C-10; F-2 F-6; E-29 F-3; E-26 FI-8FI-7 FI-6FI-5 FI-4 EI-13;FI-3 EI-12;FI-2 CI-10;FI-1 W E S T I N G H O U S E R D B E L L G I N R O A D D A I S Y C U T T E R C R O S S I N G SAM HOUSTON AVE Legend ")INTERSEC TION PROJECTS Segment Projects OTHE R OTP FACILITIES NEW - BY OTHERS ACCE SS PREVIOUSLY CONSTRUCTED NEW 2-LANE WIDEN 3-LANE WIDEN 4-LANE NEW 4-LANE 4-LA NE (1/2) WIDEN 6-LANE NEW 6-LANE 100-YR FEMA FLOOD PLAIN 0 0.75 1.50.375 Miles Georgetow n Transportation Impact Fee´Service Area FMarch 2020 PRE-CREDIT DRAFT Page 82 of 276 Downtown SCENIC DR S M AIN ST S C H U R C H S T E 2ND ST MA P L E S T S A U ST IN AVE S COLLEGE ST RALROAD AVENUE 0 0.2 0.40.1 Miles Georgetow n Transportation Impact Fee´Service Area DowntownMarch 2020 PRE-CREDIT DRAFT Page 83 of 276 Lake Ge orgetown 0 1 20.5 Miles Georgetow n Transportation Impact Fee ´Service Area Lake GeorgetownMarch 2020 PRE-CREDIT DRAFT Page 84 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 32 Table 2.SC. 10-Year Transportation Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan – Service Area Sun City Note: The 10-Year Transportation Impact Fee CIP is not in a prioritized order. Service Area Proj. #IF Class Roadway Limits Length (mi) % In Service Area SC-1 4 Lane Major Arterial Ronald W Reagan Blvd (1) Somerset Hills To 700' W Of Cr 245 0.50 50% SC-2 4 Lane Major Arterial Ronald W Reagan Blvd (2) 700' W Of Cr 245 To 1100' E Of Silver Spur Blvd 1.58 100% SC-3 4 Lane Major Arterial Ronald W Reagan Blvd (3) 1100' E Of Silver Spur Blvd To 3000' E Of Silver Spur Blvd 0.35 50% SC-4 4 Lane Major Arterial Ronald W Reagan Blvd (4) 600' W Of Ridgetop Vista Dr To Ridgetop Vista Dr 0.11 100% SC-5 4 Lane Major Arterial Ronald W Reagan Blvd (5) Ridgetop Vista Dr To 400' E Of Sun City Blvd 0.38 50% SC-6 4 Lane Major Arterial Ronald W Reagan Blvd (6) 400' E Of Sun City Blvd To Telegraph Ln 0.26 100% SC-7 4 Lane Major Arterial Ronald W Reagan Blvd (7) Telegraph Ln To 4000' E Of Telegraph Ln 0.74 50% SC-8 3 Lane Collector Cr 245 (1) Ronald W Reagan Blvd To 1400' S Of Ronald W Reagan 0.25 100% SC-9 3 Lane Collector Cr 245 (2) 1400' S Of Ronald W Reagan Blvd To 2300' S Of Ronald W 0.16 50% SC-10 3 Lane Collector Cr 245 (3) 1200' N Of Rocky Hollow Creek Dr To Rm 2338 0.47 50% SC-11 Access Management Rm 2338 (1) 3000' E Of Indian Springs Rd To 7000' E Of Indian Springs 0.71 50% SC-12 Access Management Rm 2338 (2) 350' S Of Cr 245 To W Ridgewood Rd 0.36 50% SC-13 Access Management Williams Dr 800' E Of Highland Spring Ln To 500' S Of Casaloma Cir 0.99 50% Location Improvement(s) % In Service Area SCI-1 Ronald Reagan Blvd And Cr 245 Signal 100% SCI-2 Ronald W Reagan Blvd And Sun City Blvd Signal 50% SCI-3 Cr 245 And Williams Dr Signal 25% SCI-4 Williams Drive And Jim Hogg Road Turn Lane 100% SCI-5 Williams Drive And Del Webb Blvd Turn Lane 50% SCI-6 Del Webb Blvd And Whispering Wind Turn Lane 100% SCI-7 Del Webb Blvd And Sun City Blvd Signal & Turn Lane 100% SCI-8 Sun City Blvd And Sh 195 Turn Lane 50% SCI-9 Its Upgrades Other 17% SA SC Inte r se c tio n I mpro v e me nts Page 85 of 276 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Sun City SCI-1 SCI-3 SCI-4 SCI-5 SCI-6 SCI-7 SCI-8 SCI-2 SC-9 SC-8SC-1 SC-4 SC-7 SC-6 SC-5SC-3 SC-2 SC-12 SC-13 SC-10 SC-11 SH 195 RM 2338 WILLIAMS DR WHISPERING WIND DR S H E L L S P U R DEL WEBB BLVD C R 2 4 5 SUN CITY BLVD CR 245 R O N A L D W R E A G A N B L V D JIM HOGG RD S U N C I T Y B L V D Legend ")INTERSEC TION PROJECTS Segment Projects OTH ER OTP FACILITIES NEW - BY OTHERS AC CESS PR EVIOUSLY CONSTRU CTED NEW 2-LANE WIDEN 3-LAN E WIDEN 4-LAN E NEW 4-LANE 4-LANE (1/2) WIDEN 6-LAN E NEW 6-LANE 100-YR FEMA FLOOD PLAIN 0 0.75 1.50.375 Miles Georgetow n Transportation Impact Fee´Service Area Sun CityMarch 2020 PRE-CREDIT DRAFT Page 86 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 34 IV.METHODOLOGY FOR TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES A.Service Areas The nine (9) service areas used in the 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study are shown in the previously referenced Exhibit 1. These service areas cover the entire corporate area of the City of Georgetown. Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code specifies that “the service area is limited to an area within the corporate boundaries of the political subdivision and shall not exceed six (6) miles.” The service areas in the 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study are consistent with the specification of Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code. B.Service Units The “service unit” is a measure of consumption or use of the capital facilities by new development. In other words, it is the unit of measure used in the 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study to quantify the supply and demand for roads in the City. For transportation purposes, the service unit is defined as a vehicle-mile. Below is the definition for vehicle-mile. Vehicle-Mile: The capacity consumed in a single lane in the PM peak hour by a vehicle making a trip one mile in length. The PM Peak is used as the basis for transportation planning and the estimation of trips caused by new development. Total Vehicle-Miles of Supply: Based on the total length (miles), number of lanes, and capacity (vehicles per hour) provided by the Overall Transportation Plan (see Appendix B). Total Vehicle-Miles of Demand: Based on the 10-year growth projections (Pg. 52). The demand is equal to PM Trip Rate (trips) * Trip Length (miles). Page 87 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 35 The capacity values used in the 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study are based upon Capacity Criteria published by the Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO) and modified to reflect local context within the City of Georgetown corporate limits.Table 3A and 3B show the service volumes as a function of the facility classification and type for existing and proposed facilities. Table 3A. Service Volumes for Proposed Facilities (used in Appendix B – Transportation Impact Fee CIP Service Units of Supply) Facility Classification Lanes Median Configuration Hourly Vehicle-Mile Capacity per Lane-Mile of Roadway Facility 6 Lane 6 Divided 900 4 Lane Proposed 4 Divided 810 3 Lane Proposed 3 Undivided 510 2 Lane Existing 2 Undivided 410 Table 3B. Service Volumes for Existing Facilities Roadway Type Description Hourly Vehicle-Mile Capacity per Lane-Mile of Roadway Facility 2U-G Rural Cross-Section (i.e., gravel, dirt, etc.)100 2U Two lane undivided –built-out 410 2U-OP Two lane undivided with on-street parking 330 2D Two lane divided 550 3U Three lane undivided (two-way, left-turn lane)510 4U Four lane undivided 680 4U-OP Four lane undivided with on-street parking 580 4D Four lane divided 810 5U Five lane undivided 770 6D Six lane divided 900 Page 88 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 36 C.Cost Per Service Unit A fundamental step in the impact fee process is to establish the cost for each service unit. In the case of the Transportation Impact Fee, this is the cost for each vehicle-mile of travel. Thus, it is the cost to construct a roadway (lane-mile) needed to accommodate a vehicle-mile of travel. The cost per service unit is calculated for each service area based on the roadway projects within that service area. The second component of the cost per service unit is the determination of the number of service units in each service area. This number is the measure of the growth in transportation demand that is projected to occur in the ten-year period. D.Cost of the TIF CIP All of the project costs for an arterial or collector facility which serves the overall transportation system are eligible to be included in the Transportation Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan (TIF CIP). Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code specifies that the allowable costs are “…including and limited to the: 1.Construction contract price; 2.Surveying and engineering fees; 3.Land acquisition costs, including land purchases, court awards and costs, attorney’s fees, and expert witness fees; and 4.Fees actually paid or contracted to be paid to an independent qualified engineer or financial consultant preparing or updating the capital improvements plan who is not an employee of the political subdivision.” The engineer’s opinion of the probable costs of the projects in the TIF CIP is based, in part, on the calculation of a unit cost of construction. This means that a cost per linear foot of roadway is calculated based on an average price for the various components of roadway construction. This allows the probable cost to be determined by the type of facility being constructed, the number of lanes, and the length of the project. The cost for location specific items such as bridges, highway ramps, drainage structures, and any other special components are added to each project, as appropriate. The following is a detailed description of the costing worksheet/methodology for the TIF CIP. Page 89 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 37 1.Overview of TIF CIP Costing Worksheets For each project a specific costing worksheet was developed (see Appendix A). Each worksheet contained the following four (4) main components: ·Project Information, ·Construction Pay Items, ·Construction Component Allowances and ·Summary of Costs and Allowances Project Information Construction Pay Items Construction Component Allowances Summary of Costs and Allowances Page 90 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 38 2.Project Information In order to correctly estimate the cost of a roadway project, several attributes are first identified: ·Project Number – Identifies which Service Area the project is in with a corresponding number. The corresponding number does not represent any prioritizations and is used only to identify projects. For example, Project F-20 is in Service Area F and is the 20th project on the list. ·Name – A unique identifier for each project. In some cases, abbreviations are used for the project name. ·Limits – Represents the beginning and ending location for each project. ·Impact Fee Class – The costing class to be used in the analysis. The impact fee class provides the width for the various elements in the roadway. The construction costs are variable, based on the Overall Transportation Plan classification of the roadway. Modification to roadway element widths are utilized in cases where a portion of the facility currently exists and the road is only to be widened, or where the road is planned to be widened to an interim configuration. Examples of these are access management projects, which are designated in the summary sheets at the beginning of each service area’s Conceptual Level Cost Projections in Appendix A. Other specialized cases are noted in the short description box located in this section, such as previously constructed projects with a known cost. ·Ultimate Class – the ultimate classification of the roadway, if different from the Impact Fee Class based on determination of need in the 10-year window ·Length (ft) – The distance measured in feet that is used to cost out the project. ·Service Area(s) – Represents the service areas where the project is located. Multiple service areas will be listed if the project lies along a service area boundary, or if a different jurisdiction lies along the project, it will be noted. Page 91 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 39 3.Construction Pay Items A typical roadway project consists of several costs, including the following: planning, survey, design engineering, permitting, right-of way acquisition, and construction and testing. While the construction cost component of a project may consist of approximately 100 various pay items, a simplified approach was used for developing the conceptual level project costs. The pay items used in the 2020 TIF CIP are as follows: ·Unclassified street excavation; ·HMAC Surface courses (asphalt, in depth); ·Flexible roadway base; ·Lime stabilized subgrade (only for service areas east of Interstate 35); ·Concrete sidewalks; ·Concrete curb and gutter; and ·Turn lanes and median openings. 4.Construction Component Allowances A percentage of the paving construction cost is allotted for various major construction component allowances, as appropriate. These allowances include traffic control, pavement markings, signs and posts, roadway drainage, illumination, water and sewer adjustments, turf and erosion control, landscaping and irrigation, mobilization, and preparation of right-of- way. A miscellaneous allowance of 8% was allotted for water quality ponds. These allowance percentages are also based on historical data. In addition, lump sum dollar allowances are provided for special drainage structures (bridges and culverts) and railroad crossings. The paving and allowance subtotal is given a fifteen percent (15%) contingency. Page 92 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 40 5.Summary of Cost and Allowances To determine the total Impact Fee Project Cost, sixteen percent (16%) of the construction cost total is added for engineering, surveying, and testing. ROW/easement acquisition is not included in the project costs but is a recoverable cost per Chapter 395 of the Local Government Code. The Impact Fee Project Cost Total is then the Construction Cost Total plus engineering, surveying, and testing; plus contingency, and minus roadway escrow agreements. In situations where other agencies have jurisdiction over roadways within the corporate limits, it was assumed the city contribution toward such projects would amount to 20% of the Impact Fee Project Cost Total, which aligns with historical contributions. Only the anticipated City contribution to roadway projects are recoverable per state law. E.Summary of Roadway Impact Fee CIP Costs Tables 4.A – 4.F are the 10-Year TIF CIP project lists for each service area with planning level project costs. Individual project cost worksheets can be seen in Appendix A, Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections. It should be noted that these tables reflect only conceptual-level opinions or assumptions regarding the portions of future project costs that are recoverable through impact fees. Actual project costs are likely to change with time and are dependent on market and economic conditions that cannot be predicted. The RIF TIP establishes the list of projects for which Impact Fees may be utilized. Projects not included in the TIF CIP are not eligible to receive impact fee funding. The cost projections utilized in this study should not be utilized for the City’s construction CIP. Page 93 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 41 Table 4.A – 10-Year TIF CIP with Conceptual Level Cost Projections – Service Area A a.These planning level cost projections have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Projects within the City of Georgetown. b.These planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Service Area Proj. #Class Roadway Limits Length (mi) % In Service Area Total Project Cost Cost in Service Area A-1 4 Lane Major Arterial Shell Rd (1) Sh 195 Wb To 1200' S Of Sh 195 0.11 50%320,000$160,000$ A-2 4 Lane Major Arterial Shell Rd (2) 1200' S Of Sh 195 To 200' S Of Shell Stone Trl 0.09 100%300,000$300,000$ A-3 4 Lane Major Arterial Shell Rd (3) 200' S Of Shell Stone Trl To Scenic Oaks Dr 0.11 50%320,000$160,000$ A-4 4 Lane Major Arterial Shell Rd (4) Scenic Oaks Dr To 2015' S Of Scenic Oaks Dr 0.38 100%760,000$760,000$ A-5 4 Lane Major Arterial Shell Rd (5) 2015' S Of Scenic Oaks Dr To 4315' S Of Scenic Oaks Dr 0.44 50%980,000$490,000$ A-6 4 Lane Major Arterial Shell Rd (6) 4315' S Of Scenic Oaks Dr To 4790' S Of Scenic Oaks Dr 0.09 100%300,000$300,000$ A-7 4 Lane Major Arterial Shell Rd (7) 4790' S Of Scenic Oaks Dr To 5170' S Of Scenic Oaks Dr 0.09 50%300,000$150,000$ A-8 4 Lane Major Arterial Shell Rd (8) 1870' S Of Shell Spur To 5170' S Of Scenic Oaks Dr 0.71 100%1,140,000$1,140,000$ A-9 4 Lane Major Arterial Shell Rd (9) 900' S Of Bowline Dr To 300' N Of Sycamore St 0.53 50%980,000$490,000$ A-10 4 Lane Minor Arterial Berry Creek Dr Airport Rd To Sh 195 0.70 100%4,900,000$4,900,000$ A-11 4 Lane Minor Arterial Airport Rd (1) Berry Creek Dr To 475' N Of Indian Mound Rd 0.11 100%2,300,000$2,300,000$ A-12 4 Lane Minor Arterial Airport Rd (2) 475' N Of Indian Mound Rd To 500' N Of Sanaloma Dr 0.69 50%6,700,000$3,350,000$ A-13 4 Lane Minor Arterial Airport Rd (3) Cavu Rd To 300' S Of Vortac Ln 0.25 50%2,200,000$1,100,000$ A-14 4 Lane Minor Arterial Airport Rd (4) 300' S Of Vortac Ln To Lakeway Dr 0.95 100%5,900,000$5,900,000$ A-15 4 Lane Collector Lakeway Dr Northwest Blvd To Airport Rd 1.13 100%6,000,000$6,000,000$ A-16 4 Lane Major Arterial Shell Rd (10) 500' N Of Bowline Dr To 200' N Of Sycamore St 0.36 50%680,000$340,000$ A-17 4 Lane Major Arterial Shell Rd (11) 300' N Of Sycamore St To 600' N Of Bellaire Dr 0.14 100%380,000$380,000$ A-18 4 Lane Major Arterial Shell Rd (12) 600' N Of Bellaire Dr To Verde Vista 0.72 100%1,160,000$1,160,000$ A-19 4 Lane Collector Shell Rd (13) Verde Vista To 500' N Of Williams Dr 0.26 100%380,000$380,000$ A-20 4 Lane Collector Verde Vista Williams Dr To 1500' E Of Williams Dr 0.28 100%380,000$380,000$ A-21 3 Lane Collector Wildwood Dr Verde Vista Dr To Williams Dr 0.31 100%1,000,000$1,000,000$ A-22; B-1 Access Management Williams Dr (2) 400' N Of Bettie Mae Way To 1200' E Of Country Rd 2.04 50%2,600,000$1,300,000$ A-23;B-2 Access Management Williams Dr (3) 900' E Of La Paloma Dr To Country Rd 0.22 50%1,100,000$550,000$ A-24; B-3 Access Management Williams Dr (4) Country Rd To S Ih 35 Sb 2.40 50%2,900,000$1,450,000$ A-25 3 Lane Collector Lakeway Dr Whisper Oaks Ln To Williams Dr 0.38 100%1,200,000$1,200,000$ A-26 4 Lane Minor Arterial Rivery Blvd Northwest Blvd To Williams Drive 0.53 100%4,335,000$4,335,000$ Proj. #Location Improvement(s) % In Service Area Total Project Cost Cost in Service Area AI-1 Sh 195 And Shell Rd Innovative 25%10,000,000$2,500,000$ AI-2 Berry Creek Dr And Sh 195 Signal 100%500,000$500,000$ AI-3 Ih35/Sh195 Ramp And Frontage Turn Lane 50%200,000$100,000$ AI-4 Ih35/Sh195 Ramp And Frontage Turn Lane 50%200,000$100,000$ AI-5 Bellaire Drive And Shell Road Signal 50%500,000$250,000$ AI-6 Luna Trail And Serenada Drive Turn Lane & Turn Lane 50%140,000$70,000$ AI-7 Northwest Blvd And Serenada Dr Roundabout & Turn Lane 50%2,070,000$1,035,000$ AI-8 N Ih 35 Frontage And Sh 130 Frontage Signal 50%500,000$250,000$ AI-9;CI-1 N Ih 35 Frontage And Sh 130 Frontage Signal 50%500,000$250,000$ AI-10 Wildwood Drive And Verde Vista Roundabout 25%2,000,000$500,000$ AI-11 Verde Vista Drive And Shell Road Signal 100%500,000$500,000$ AI-12;BI-1 Woodlake Drive And Williams Drive Turn Lane 50%400,000$200,000$ AI-13;BI-2 Wildwood Drive And Williams Drive Turn Lane 50%400,000$200,000$ AI-14;BI-3 Estrella Crossing And Williams Drive Signal & Turn Lane 50%900,000$450,000$ AI-15;BI-4 Serenada Drive And Williams Drive Turn Lane 50%400,000$200,000$ AI-16;BI-5 Williams Drive And Lakeway Drive Turn Lane 50%400,000$200,000$ AI-17;BI-6 River Bend And Williams Drive Turn Lane 50%400,000$200,000$ AI-18 Lakeway Drive And Northwest Blvd Roundabout 100%2,000,000$2,000,000$ AI-19 Northwest Blvd And Golden Oaks Drive Roundabout 100%2,000,000$2,000,000$ AI-20;CI-4 N Ih 35 And Northwest Blvd Overpass 50%10,115,000$5,057,500$ AI-21 Its System Upgrades Other 17%20,000,000$3,340,000$ 39,975,000$ 19,902,500$ 19,651$ Service Area Roadway Project Cost Subtotal 2019 Transportation Impact Fee Study Cost Per Service Area SA A Intersection Improvements Service Area Intersection Project Cost Subtotal Page 94 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 42 Table 4.B – 10-Year TIF CIP with Conceptual Level Cost Projections – Service Area B a.These planning level cost projections have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Projects within the City of Georgetown. b.These planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Service Area Proj. #Class Roadway Limits Length (mi) % In Service Area Total Project Cost Cost in Service Area A-22; B-1 Access Management Williams Dr (2) 400' N Of Bettie Mae Way To 1200' E Of Country Rd 2.04 50%2,600,000$1,300,000$ A-23;B-2 Access Management Williams Dr (3) 900' E Of La Paloma Dr To Country Rd 0.22 50%1,100,000$550,000$ A-24; B-3 Access Management Williams Dr (4) Country Rd To S Ih 35 Sb 2.40 50%2,900,000$1,450,000$ B-4 Previously Constructed D B Wood Rd (1) Williams Dr To 1300' S Of Williams Dr 0.24 100%2,145,000$2,145,000$ B-5 Access Management D B Wood Rd (2) 1800' S Of Williams Dr To 3200' S Of Williams Dr 0.26 50%1,000,000$500,000$ B-6 4 Lane Major Arterial D B Wood Rd (3) 3200' S Of Williams Dr To Cedar Breaks Rd 1.29 50%15,900,000$7,950,000$ B-7 4 Lane Major Arterial D B Wood Rd (4) Cedar Breaks Rd To W University Ave 1.89 100%14,800,000$14,800,000$ B-8 3 Lane Collector Country Rd Williams Dr To 500' S Of Rustle Cv 0.39 50%1,200,000$600,000$ B-9 3 Lane Collector Bootys Crossing Rd 400' W Of Pecan Ln To Williams Dr 1.11 100%4,500,000$4,500,000$ B-10 4 Lane Collector Wolf Ranch Pkwy Rivery Blvd To Memorial Drive 1.39 100%6,100,000$6,100,000$ B-11 3 Lane Collector Memorial Drive (1) Rivr Chase Blvd To Wolf Ranch Pkwy 0.39 100%1,300,000$1,300,000$ B-12 4 Lane Collector Memorial Drive (2) Wolf Ranch Pkwy To Wolf Lakes Dr 0.29 100%2,000,000$2,000,000$ B-13; D-3 6 Lane Major Arterial W Sh 29 (3) Wood Ct To Wolf Ranch Pkwy 0.75 50%1,540,000$770,000$ B-14; D-4 6 Lane Major Arterial W University Ave Wolf Ranch Pkwy To Scenic Dr 0.97 50%2,320,000$1,160,000$ Proj. #Location Improvement(s) % In Service Area Total Project Cost Cost in Service Area AI-12;BI-1 Woodlake Drive And Williams Drive Turn Lane 50%400,000$200,000$ AI-13;BI-2 Wildwood Drive And Williams Drive Turn Lane 50%400,000$200,000$ AI-14;BI-3 Estrella Crossing And Williams Drive Signal & Turn Lane 25%900,000$225,000$ AI-15;BI-4 Serenada Drive And Williams Drive Turn Lane 50%400,000$200,000$ AI-16;BI-5 Williams Drive And Lakeway Drive Turn Lane 50%400,000$200,000$ AI-17;BI-6 River Bend And Williams Drive Turn Lane 50%400,000$200,000$ BI-7 Db Wood Road And Cedar Breaks Drive Turn Lane & Turn Lane 75%400,000$300,000$ BI-8;DI-1 Db Wood Road And Sh 29 (University) Signal 50%500,000$250,000$ BI-9;DI-2 Scenic Drive And University Ave Turn Lane & Turn Lane 25%140,000$35,000$ BI-10 Its System Upgrade Other 17%20,000,000$3,340,000$ 45,125,000$ 5,150,000$ 19,651$ SA B Service Area Roadway Project Cost Subtotal 2019 Transportation Impact Fee Study Cost Per Service Area Intersection Improvements Service Area Intersection Project Cost Subtotal Page 95 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 43 Table 4.C – 10-Year TIF CIP with Conceptual Level Cost Projections – Service Area C a.These planning level cost projections have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Projects within the City of Georgetown. b.These planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Service Area Proj. #Class Roadway Limits Length (mi) % In Service Area Total Project Cost Cost in Service Area C-1 4 Lane Major Arterial Ne Inner Loop Ih 35 Nb To University Ave 3.12 100%34,700,000$34,700,000$ C-2 4 Lane Minor Arterial Stadium Drive N Austin Ave To Ne Inner Loop 0.49 100%8,200,000$8,200,000$ C-3 4 Lane Minor Arterial Stadium Drive Ne Inner Loop To 1470' E Of Ne Inner Loop 0.28 50%2,700,000$1,350,000$ C-4 Access Management N Austin Ave Ne Inner Loop To Williams Drive 1.93 100%420,000$420,000$ C-5 4 Lane Major Arterial Northwest Blvd N Ih 35 Fwy Nb To N Austin Ave 0.22 100%2,700,000$2,700,000$ C-6 4 Lane Major Arterial Fm 971 (1) N Austin Ave To E Morrow St 0.63 100%2,666,846$2,666,846$ C-7 4 Lane Major Arterial Fm 971 (2) E Morrow St To Sh 130 Sb 1.26 100%5,035,521$5,035,521$ C-8;F-1 4 Lane Major Arterial E Sh 29 (1) Haven Street To 300' E Of Reinhardt Blvd 1.32 50%3,020,000$1,510,000$ C-9 4 Lane Major Arterial E Sh 29 (2) 300' E Of Reinhardt Blvd To 300' E Of Owen Cir 0.42 50%840,000$420,000$ C-10;F-2 Access Management E Sh 29 (3) 300' E Of Owen Cir To Sh 130 0.08 50%180,000$90,000$ Proj. #Location Improvement(s) % In Service Area Total Project Cost Cost in Service Area AI-9;CI-1 N Ih 35 Frontage And Sh 130 Frontage Signal 50%500,000$250,000$ CI-2 Cr 151 (Stadium Drive) And Austin Avenue Signal 100%500,000$500,000$ CI-3 Inner Loop And Cr 151 (Stadium Drive) Roundabout 100%2,000,000$2,000,000$ AI-20;CI-4 N Ih 35 And Northwest Blvd Overpass 50%10,115,000$5,057,500$ CI-5 N Austin Ave And Fm 971 Signal 100%500,000$500,000$ CI-6 N Austin Ave And Old Airport Rd Turn Lane & Signal 100%784,000$784,000$ CI-7 Fm 971 And Cr 152 Signal 100%500,000$500,000$ CI-8 S Austin Ave And 2Nd St Turn Lane 100%284,000$284,000$ CI-9 Maple Street And Smith Creek Rd Signal 100%500,000$500,000$ CI-10;FI-1 E University Ave And Hutto Rd Turn Lane 50%400,000$200,000$ CI-11 Its System Upgrades Other 17%20,000,000$3,340,000$ 57,092,367$ 13,915,500$ 19,651$ SA C Intersection Improvements Service Area Roadway Project Cost Subtotal Service Area Intersection Project Cost Subtotal 2019 Transportation Impact Fee Study Cost Per Service Area Page 96 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 44 Table 4.D – 10-Year TIF CIP with Conceptual Level Cost Projections – Service Area D a.These planning level cost projections have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Projects within the City of Georgetown. b.These planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Service Area Proj. #Class Roadway Limits Length (mi) % In Service Area Total Project Cost Cost in Service Area D-1 6 Lane Major Arterial W Sh 29 (1) 2500' E Of Gabriel Forest To 1000' E Of Wood Ranch Rd 1.47 50%2,840,000$1,420,000$ D-2 6 Lane Major Arterial W Sh 29 (2) 1000' E Of Wood Ranch Rd To Wood Ct 0.25 100%620,000$620,000$ B-13; D-3 6 Lane Major Arterial W Sh 29 (3) Wood Ct To Wolf Ranch Pkwy 0.75 50%1,540,000$770,000$ B-14; D-4 6 Lane Major Arterial W University Ave Wolf Ranch Pkwy To Scenic Dr 0.97 50%2,320,000$1,160,000$ D-5 4 Lane Minor Arterial D B Wood Rd University Ave To Wolf Ranch Pkwy 0.28 100%2,300,000$2,300,000$ D-6 4 Lane Minor Arterial Wolf Ranch Pkwy University Blvd To Southwest Byp 1.40 100%11,072,399$11,072,399$ D-7 4 Lane Major Arterial Southwest Bypass (1) Wolf Ranch Pkwy To 3400' S Of Wolf Ranch Pkwy 0.63 100%4,987,068$4,987,068$ D-8 4 Lane Major Arterial Southwest Bypass (2) 3400' S Of Wolf Ranch Pkwy To 900' S Of Rocky Hill Dr 0.47 50%3,683,817$1,841,909$ D-9 4 Lane Major Arterial Southwest Bypass (3) 900' S Of Rocky Hill Dr To Leander Rd 0.25 100%1,979,565$1,979,565$ D-10 4 Lane Major Arterial Rr 2243 (1) Limestone Creek Rd To River Ridge Dr 5.84 100%9,262,556$9,262,556$ D-11 Access Management Rr 2243 (2) River Ridge Dr To Ih 35 1.09 100%904,244$904,244$ D-12 2 Lane Major Arterial New Southwest Bypass W University Ave To Wolf Ranch Pkwy 0.54 100%2,300,000$2,300,000$ Proj. #Location Improvement(s) % In Service Area Total Project Cost Cost in Service Area BI-8;DI-1 Db Wood Road And Sh 29 (University) Signal 50%500,000$250,000$ BI-9;DI-2 Scenic Drive And University Ave Turn Lane & Turn Lane 25%140,000$35,000$ DI-3 D B Wood Rd And Wolf Ranch Pkwy Signal 100%500,000$500,000$ DI-4;EI-1 Scenic Drive And W 17Th St Roundabout 50%2,000,000$1,000,000$ DI-5;EI-5 Leander Rd And Scenic Dr Signal 25%500,000$125,000$ DI-6 Leander Road And Escalera Parkway Turn Lane 100%70,000$70,000$ DI-7 W University Ave And Southwest Bypass Signal 100%500,000$500,000$ DI-8 Its System Upgrades Other 17%20,000,000$3,340,000$ 38,617,741$ 5,820,000$ 19,651$ SA D Intersection Improvements Service Area Roadway Project Cost Subtotal Service Area Intersection Project Cost Subtotal 2019 Transportation Impact Fee Study Cost Per Service Area Page 97 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 45 Table 4.E – 10-Year TIF CIP with Conceptual Level Cost Projections – Service Area E a.These planning level cost projections have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Projects within the City of Georgetown. b.These planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Service Area Proj. #Class Roadway Limits Length (mi) % In Service Area Total Project Cost Cost in Service Area E-1 Access Management Leander Rd Scenic Drive To Fm 1460 0.96 100%380,000$380,000$ E-2 4 Lane Major Arterial S Austin Ave 18Th Street To Se Inner Loop 1.38 100%2,800,000$2,800,000$ E-3 Previously Constructed Fm 1460 (1) Fm 1460 To 2900' S Of Old Fm 1460 0.25 100%840,213$840,213$ E-4 Previously Constructed Fm 1460 (2) 2900' S Of Fm 1460 To 4400' S Of Old Fm 1460 0.28 100%937,088$937,088$ E-5 Previously Constructed Fm 1460 (3) 200' S Of Se Inner Loop To 4400' S Of Old Fm 1460 0.42 100%1,396,767$1,396,767$ E-6 Previously Constructed Fm 1460 (4) 200' S Of Se Inner Loop To 1000' S Of Se Inner Loop 0.14 100%483,740$483,740$ E-7 Previously Constructed Fm 1460 (5) 1000' S Of Se Inner Loop To 1600' S Of Se Inner Loop 0.11 50%381,167$190,583$ E-8 Previously Constructed Fm 1460 (6) 1600' S Of Se Inner Loop To 500' N Of Naturita Dr 0.51 100%1,714,617$1,714,617$ E-9 Previously Constructed Fm 1460 (7) 500' N Of Naturita Dr To 600' S Of Naturita Dr 0.20 100%664,826$664,826$ E-10 Previously Constructed Fm 1460 (8) 600' S Of Naturita Dr To 400' S Of Midnight Ln 0.18 50%613,539$306,770$ E-11 Previously Constructed Fm 1460 (9) 400' S Of Midnight Ln To 1000' S Of Midnight Ln 0.09 50%307,719$153,860$ E-12 Previously Constructed Fm 1460 (10) 1000' S Of Midnight Ln To Westinghouse Rd 0.31 50%1,026,997$513,499$ E-13 Previously Constructed Fm 1460 (11) Westinghouse Rd To 1800' S Of Westinghouse Rd 0.31 100%1,040,294$1,040,294$ E-14 4 Lane Major Arterial Se Inner Loop (1) S Austin Ave To 600' W Of S Austin Ave 0.11 100%1,700,000$1,700,000$ E-15 4 Lane Major Arterial Se Inner Loop (2) 600' E Of S Austin Ave To 1800' E Of S Austin Ave 0.87 50%10,900,000$5,450,000$ E-16 4 Lane Major Arterial Se Inner Loop (3) 900' W Of Fm 1460 To Sam Houston Ave 0.57 100%6,300,000$6,300,000$ E-17 4 Lane Collector Rabbit Hill Rd (2) 700' N Of Commerce Blvd To 300' N Of Commerce Blvd 0.06 50%1,200,000$600,000$ E-18 4 Lane Collector Rabbit Hill Rd (1) 300' N Of Commerce Blvd To Westinghouse Rd 0.33 100%2,400,000$2,400,000$ E-19 6 Lane Major Arterial Westinghouse Rd (1) S Ih 35 To 2000' E Of Mays St 1.10 100%13,200,000$13,200,000$ E-20 6 Lane Major Arterial Westinghouse Rd (2) 2000' E Of Mays St To 2500' E Of Mays St 0.09 50%1,900,000$950,000$ E-21 6 Lane Major Arterial Westinghouse Rd (3) 2500' E Of Mays St To 3000' E Of Mays St 0.11 100%2,100,000$2,100,000$ E-22 6 Lane Major Arterial Westinghouse Rd (4) 3600' E Of Mays St To 5800' E Of Mays St 0.40 50%5,100,000$2,550,000$ E-23 6 Lane Major Arterial Westinghouse Rd (5) 5800' E Of Mays St To 700' E Of Scenic Lake Dr 0.29 100%3,900,000$3,900,000$ E-24 6 Lane Major Arterial Westinghouse Rd (6) 700' E Of Scenic Lake Dr To Fm 1460 0.12 50%2,200,000$1,100,000$ E-25 4 Lane Major Arterial Westinghouse Rd (7) Fm 1460 To Maple Street 0.72 100%6,600,000$6,600,000$ E-26;F-3 4 Lane Collector Maple St (1) E 22Nd Street To Brittania Blvd 0.10 50%3,800,000$1,900,000$ E-27;F-4 4 Lane Collector Maple St (2) Brittania Blvd To Se Inner Loop 0.91 50%18,200,000$9,100,000$ E-28;F-5 4 Lane Collector Maple St (3) Se Inner Loop To Pinnacle Dr 0.78 50%4,600,000$2,300,000$ E-29;F-6 4 Lane Collector Maple St (4) Pinnacle Dr To Westinghouse Rd 0.84 50%5,200,000$2,600,000$ Proj. #Location Improvement(s) % In Service Area Total Project Cost Cost in Service Area DI-4;EI-1 Scenic Drive And W 17Th St Roundabout 50%2,000,000$1,000,000$ EI-2 Railroad Ave And 17Th Street Signal 75%500,000$375,000$ EI-3 W 17Th Street And S Austin Ave Signal & Turn Lane 75%640,000$480,000$ EI-4 E 17Th St And S Church St Turn Lane 75%70,000$52,500$ DI-5;EI-5 Leander Rd And Scenic Dr Signal & Turn Lane 50%640,000$320,000$ EI-6 Austin Ave And Leander Rd Turn Lane 75%400,000$300,000$ EI-7 Austin Ave And 21St Street Signal & Turn Lane 75%640,000$480,000$ EI-8 S Main St And W 21St St Signal 75%500,000$375,000$ EI-9 E 21St Street And Industrial Ave Roundabout 75%2,000,000$1,500,000$ EI-10 Industrial Ave And Fm 1460 Signal 50%500,000$250,000$ EI-11 Snead Drive (Blue Springs Rd) And Se Inner Loop Signal 50%500,000$250,000$ EI-12;FI-2 Sam Houston Ave And Maple Street Innovative 50%10,000,000$5,000,000$ EI-13;FI-3 Se Inner Loop And Maple Street Innovative 50%10,000,000$5,000,000$ EI-14 La Conterra Blvd And Fm 1460 Signal 50%500,000$250,000$ EI-15 Westinghouse Rd And Scenic Lake Dr Signal 100%500,000$500,000$ EI-16 Westinghouse Rd And Fm 1460 Turn Lane 75%400,000$300,000$ EI-17 Its System Upgrades Other 17%20,000,000$3,340,000$ 74,172,255$ 19,772,500$ 19,651$ SA E Intersection Improvements Service Area Roadway Project Cost Subtotal Service Area Intersection Project Cost Subtotal 2019 Transportation Impact Fee Study Cost Per Service Area Page 98 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 46 Table 4.F – 10-Year TIF CIP with Conceptual Level Cost Projections – Service Area F a.These planning level cost projections have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Projects within the City of Georgetown. b.These planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Service Area Proj. #Class Roadway Limits Length (mi) % In Service Area Total Project Cost Cost in Service Area C-8;F-1 4 Lane Major Arterial E Sh 29 (1) Haven Street To 300' E Of Reinhardt Blvd 1.32 50%3,020,000$1,510,000$ C-10;F-2 Access Management E Sh 29 (2) 300' E Of Owen Cir To Sh 130 0.08 50%180,000$90,000$ E-26;F-3 4 Lane Collector Maple St (1) E 22Nd Street To Brittania Blvd 0.10 50%3,800,000$1,900,000$ E-27;F-4 4 Lane Collector Maple St (2) Brittania Blvd To Se Inner Loop 0.91 50%18,200,000$9,100,000$ E-28;F-5 4 Lane Collector Maple St (3) Se Inner Loop To Pinnacle Dr 0.78 50%4,600,000$2,300,000$ E-29;F-6 4 Lane Collector Maple St (4) Pinnacle Dr To Westinghouse Rd 0.84 50%5,200,000$2,600,000$ F-7 4 Lane Minor Arterial Se Inner Loop (1) University Ave To Rockride Ln 1.19 100%8,800,000$8,800,000$ F-8 4 Lane Minor Arterial Se Inner Loop (2) Rockride Ln To Southwestern Blvd 0.27 50%3,000,000$1,500,000$ F-9 4 Lane Minor Arterial Se Inner Loop (3) Southwestern Blvd To Maple Street 0.77 100%5,800,000$5,800,000$ F-10 4 Lane Minor Arterial Southwestern Blvd (1) Raintree Dr To 1500' S Of Raintree Dr 0.28 100%2,700,000$2,700,000$ F-11 4 Lane Minor Arterial Southwestern Blvd (2) 1500' S Of Raintree Dr To Se Inner Loop 0.25 50%2,400,000$1,200,000$ F-12 4 Lane Major Arterial Southwestern Blvd (3) Se Inner Loop To Sam Houston Ave 0.66 100%6,100,000$6,100,000$ F-13 4 Lane Major Arterial Southwestern Blvd (4) Sam Houston Ave To Fairhaven Gtwy 0.60 100%5,600,000$5,600,000$ F-14 4 Lane Major Arterial Southwestern Blvd (5) Fairhaven Gtwy To Westinghouse Rd 0.71 100%6,500,000$6,500,000$ F-15 4 Lane Collector Rockride Ln (1) Se Inner Loop To Sam Houston Ave 0.76 100%4,500,000$4,500,000$ F-16 4 Lane Collector Rockride Ln (2) Sam Houston Ave To 2200' S Of Sam Houston Ave 0.41 50%3,100,000$1,550,000$ F-17 4 Lane Collector Rockride Ln (3) 2200' S Of Sam Houston Ave To 2700' S Of Sam Houston Ave 0.09 100%2,800,000$2,800,000$ F-18 4 Lane Minor Arterial Carlson Cove 1900' E Of Rock Ride Ln To Sam Houston Ave 1.01 100%7,300,000$7,300,000$ F-19 4 Lane Major Arterial Patriot Way (1) Sh 130 Frontage To Sam Houston Ave 0.45 100%4,800,000$4,800,000$ F-20 4 Lane Major Arterial Sam Houston (1) Southwestern Blvd To Patriot Way 1.77 100%16,200,000$16,200,000$ F-21 2 Lane Major Arterial Sam Houston (2) Patriot Way To 2900' E Of Sh 130 Nb 1.15 100%5,700,000$5,700,000$ F-22 4 Lane Minor Arterial Bell Gin Rd Sam Houston Ave To Westinghouse Rd 1.56 50%13,700,000$6,850,000$ F-23 4 Lane Major Arterial Westinghouse Rd Maple St To Bell Gin Rd 1.83 50%15,700,000$7,850,000$ Proj. #Location Improvement(s) % In Service Area Total Project Cost Cost in Service Area CI-10;FI-1 E University Ave And Hutto Rd Turn Lane 50%400,000$200,000$ EI-12;FI-2 Sam Houston Ave And Maple Street Innovative 50%10,000,000$5,000,000$ EI-13;FI-3 Se Inner Loop And Maple Street Innovative 50%10,000,000$5,000,000$ FI-4 Southwestern Blvd And Se Inner Loop Signal & Turn Lane 75%640,000$480,000$ FI-5 Rock Ride Lane And Se Inner Loop Signal 50%500,000$250,000$ FI-6 Sh130 And Patriot Way Signal 100%500,000$500,000$ FI-7 Sam Houston Ave And Southwestern Blvd Signal 100%500,000$500,000$ FI-8 Sam Houston Ave And Rock Ride Ln Signal & Turn Lane 100%640,000$640,000$ FI-9 Its System Upgrade Signal & Turn Lane 17%20,000,000$3,340,000$ 113,250,000$ 15,910,000$ 19,651$ SA F I ntersection Improvements Service Area Roadway Project Cost Subtotal Service Area Intersection Project Cost Subtotal 2019 Transportation Impact Fee Study Cost Per Service Area Page 99 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 47 Table 4.SC – 10-Year TIF CIP with Conceptual Level Cost Projections – Service Area Sun City a.These planning level cost projections have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Projects within the City of Georgetown. b.These planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Service Area Proj. #Class Roadway Limits Length (mi) % In Service Area Total Project Cost Cost in Service Area SC-1 4 Lane Major Arterial Ronald W Reagan Blvd (1)Somerset Hills To 700' W Of Cr 245 0.50 50%4,300,000$2,150,000$ SC-2 4 Lane Major Arterial Ronald W Reagan Blvd (2) 700' W Of Cr 245 To 1100' E Of Silver Spur Blvd 1.58 100%12,100,000$12,100,000$ SC-3 4 Lane Major Arterial Ronald W Reagan Blvd (3) 1100' E Of Silver Spur Blvd To 3000' E Of Silver Spur Blvd 0.35 50%3,200,000$1,600,000$ SC-4 4 Lane Major Arterial Ronald W Reagan Blvd (4)600' W Of Ridgetop Vista Dr To Ridgetop Vista Dr 0.11 100%1,600,000$1,600,000$ SC-5 4 Lane Major Arterial Ronald W Reagan Blvd (5) Ridgetop Vista Dr To 400' E Of Sun City Blvd 0.38 50%4,400,000$2,200,000$ SC-6 4 Lane Major Arterial Ronald W Reagan Blvd (6) 400' E Of Sun City Blvd To Telegraph Ln 0.26 100%5,600,000$5,600,000$ SC-7 4 Lane Major Arterial Ronald W Reagan Blvd (7) Telegraph Ln To 4000' E Of Telegraph Ln 0.74 50%5,900,000$2,950,000$ SC-8 3 Lane Collector Cr 245 (1) Ronald W Reagan Blvd To 1400' S Of Ronald W Reagan Blvd 0.25 100%800,000$800,000$ SC-9 3 Lane Collector Cr 245 (2) 1400' S Of Ronald W Reagan Blvd To 2300' S Of Ronald W Reagan Blvd 0.16 50%2,900,000$1,450,000$ SC-10 3 Lane Collector Cr 245 (3) 1200' N Of Rocky Hollow Creek Dr To Rm 2338 0.47 50%1,500,000$750,000$ SC-11 Access Management Rm 2338 (1) 3000' E Of Indian Springs Rd To 7000' E Of Indian Springs Rd 0.71 50%260,000$130,000$ SC-12 Access Management Rm 2338 (2) 350' S Of Cr 245 To W Ridgewood Rd 0.36 50%274,650$137,325$ SC-13 Access Management Williams Dr 800' E Of Highland Spring Ln To 500' S Of Casaloma Cir 0.99 50%1,500,000$750,000$ Proj. #Location Improvement(s) % In Service Area Total Project Cost Cost in Service Area SCI-1 Ronald Reagan Blvd And Cr 245 Signal 100%500,000$500,000$ SCI-2 Ronald W Reagan Blvd And Sun City Blvd Signal 50%500,000$250,000$ SCI-3 Cr 245 And Williams Dr Signal 25%500,000$125,000$ SCI-4 Williams Drive And Jim Hogg Road Turn Lane 100%140,000$140,000$ SCI-5 Williams Drive And Del Webb Blvd Turn Lane 50%70,000$35,000$ SCI-6 Del Webb Blvd And Whispering Wind Turn Lane 100%70,000$70,000$ SCI-7 Del Webb Blvd And Sun City Blvd Signal & Turn Lane 100%570,000$570,000$ SCI-8 Sun City Blvd And Sh 195 Turn Lane 50%140,000$70,000$ SCI-9 Its Upgrades Other 17%20,000,000$3,340,000$ 32,217,325$ 5,100,000$ 19,651$2019 Transportation Impact Fee Study Cost Per Service Area SA SC Service Area Roadway Project Cost Subtotal Service Area Intersection Project Cost Subtotal Intersectio n I mprov ements Page 100 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 48 F.Service Unit Calculation The basic service unit for the computation of Georgetown’s Transportation Impact Fees is the vehicle-mile of travel during the afternoon peak-hour (as explained on Pg. 34). To determine the cost per service unit, it is necessary to project the growth in vehicle-miles of travel for the service area for the 10-year period. The growth in vehicle-miles from 2020 to 2030 is based upon projected changes in residential units and employment for the period. To determine this growth, estimates of residential units, basic employment, service employment, and retail employment for 2020 were made, along with growth projections for each of these demographic statistics through 2030. The Land Use Assumptions section of this report details the growth estimates used for impact fee determination. For the purposes of impact fees, all developed and developable land is categorized as either residential or non-residential. For residential land uses, the existing and projected number of dwelling units are estimated. The number of dwelling units in each service area is multiplied by a transportation demand factor (discussed in more detail below) to compute the vehicle-miles of travel that occur during the afternoon peak hour. This factor indicates the average amount of demand created by the residential land uses in the service area. For non-residential land uses, the process is similar. The Land Use Assumptions section of this report provides existing and projected number of building square footages for three (3) categories of employment – basic, service, and retail. These categories correspond to an aggregation of other specific land use categories based on the North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS). Building square footage is the most common independent variable for the estimation of non-residential trips in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. This characteristic is more appropriate than the number of employees, because building square footage is tied more closely to trip generation and Page 101 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 49 is known at the time of application for any development that would require the assessment of an impact fee. The existing and projected land use assumptions for the dwelling units and the square footage of basic, service, and retail land uses provide the basis for the projected increase in vehicle-miles of travel. As noted earlier, a transportation demand factor is applied to these values and then summed to calculate the total peak hour vehicle-miles of demand for each service area. The transportation demand factors are aggregate rates derived from two sources – the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition and the National Household Travel Survey performed by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). The ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition provides the number of trips that are produced or attracted to the land use for each dwelling unit, square foot of building, or other corresponding unit. For the retail category of land uses, the rate is adjusted to account for the fact that a percentage of retail trips are made by people who would otherwise be traveling past that particular establishment anyway, such as a trip between work and home. For example, a stop at a nearby supermarket on the way home from work does not create a new trip onto the roadway network. These trips are called pass-by trips, and since the travel demand is accounted for in the land use calculations relative to the primary trip, it is necessary to discount the retail trip generation rates to avoid double counting trips. The next component of the transportation demand factor accounts for the length of each trip. The average trip length for each category is based on the Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO) long-range transportation model and supplemented with the National Household Travel Survey conducted by the FHWA. Page 102 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 50 The computation of the transportation demand factor is based on the following equation: Variables: TDF = Transportation Demand Factor, T = Trip Rate (peak hour trips / unit), Pb =Pass-By Discount (% of trips), Lmax = Maximum Trip Length (miles), L = Average Trip Length (miles), and OD = Origin-Destination Reduction (50%) The maximum trip length was limited to six (6) miles based on the maximum trip length within each service area. Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code allows for a service area of six (6) miles, and the service areas within Georgetown are closely approximated with a six (6) mile distance. The adjustment made to the average trip length statistic in the computation of the maximum trip length is the origin-destination reduction. This adjustment is made because the Transportation Impact Fee is charged to both the origin and destination end of the trip. For example, impact fee methodology will account for a trip from home to work within Georgetown to both residential and non-residential land uses. To avoid counting these trips twice as both residential and non-residential trips, a 50% origin-destination (OD) reduction factor is applied. Therefore, only half of the trip length is assessed to each land use, and the total trip is only counted once. This methodology is consistent with that used in the National Household Travel Survey. These lengths were developed based on the CAMPO long-range transportation model. )6or*(min *)1(* max max where...ODLL LPTTDFb = -= Page 103 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 51 Table 5 shows the derivation of the Transportation Demand Factor for the residential land uses and the three (3) non-residential land use categories. The values utilized for all variables shown in the transportation demand factor equation are also shown in the table. Table 5. Transportation Demand Factor Calculations Variable Residential, Single Family Residential, Multifamily Basic Service Retail T 0.99 0.56 0.63 1.15 3.81 Pb 0%0%0%0%34% L 8.59 8.59 12.89 6.76 6.35 Lmax 4.30 4.30 6.00 3.38 3.18 TDF 4.26 2.41 3.78 3.89 7.98 * Lmax is less than 6 miles for residential, service, and retail land uses; therefore this lower trip length is used for calculating the TDF for these land uses. Variables: TDF = Transportation Demand Factor, T = Trip Rate (peak hour trips / unit), Pb =Pass-By Discount (% of trips), Lmax = Maximum Trip Length (miles), L = Average Trip Length (miles), and OD = Origin-Destination Reduction (50%) The application of the demographic projections and the transportation demand factors are presented in the 10-Year Growth Projections in Table 6. This table shows the growth in total vehicle-miles by service area between the years 2020 – 2030. Page 104 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 52 Table 6. 10-Year Growth Projections 2020-20 30 Gr owth Projections 1 T OTAL Single Family Units T rip Rate T DF2 M ulti-Family Units T rip Rate T DF3 VEHICLE M ILES4 BASIC SERVICE RET AIL B ASIC7 SERVICE8 RETAIL9 BASIC SERVICE RET AIL T OT AL VEH IC LE M ILES11 0.99 0.56 0.63 1.15 2.51 A 2,720 680 13,225 180,000 800,000 710,000 680 3,112 5,666 9,458 22,683 B 838 209 4,073 64,800 510,000 510,000 245 1,984 4,070 6,299 10,372 C 1,080 270 5,253 108,000 648,000 396,000 408 2,521 3,160 6,089 11,342 D 1,502 376 7,306 21,600 310,000 350,000 82 1,206 2,793 4,081 11,387 E 1,090 273 5,303 0 430,000 430,000 0 1,673 3,431 5,104 10,407 F 2,094 524 10,184 25,200 576,000 360,000 95 2,241 2,873 5,209 15,393 SUN CIT Y 3,880 970 18,869 0 324,000 360,000 0 1,260 2,873 4,133 23,002 T otals 13,205 3,301 64,211 399,600 3,598,000 3,116,000 1,510 13,997 24,866 40,373 104,584 VEH ICLE-MILES OF INCREASE (2020-2030) Note s: A 22,683 1 From City of Georgetown 2020 Land Use Assum ptions for R oadway Im pact Fees B 10,372 2 Transportation Dem and Factor for each Service Area (from LUVMET) using Single Fam ily Detached Housing land use and trip generation rate C 11,342 3 Transportation Dem and Factor for each Service Area (from LUVMET) using Multifam ily Housing (Low-R ise) land use and trip generation rate D 11,387 4 Calculated by multiplying TDF by the num ber of dwelling units E 10,407 5 From City of Georgetown 2020 Land Use Assum ptions for R oadway Im pact Fees F 15,393 6 Trip generation rate and Transportation Demand Factors from LUVMET for each land use SUN CIT Y 23,002 7 'Basic' corresponds to General Light Industrial land use and trip generation rate 8 'Service' corresponds to General Office land use and trip generation rate 9 'R etail' corresponds to Shopping Center land use and trip generation rate 10 Calculated by m ultiplying Transportation D emand Factor by the num ber of thousand square feet for each land use 11 Residential plus non-residential vehicle-mile totals for each Service Area SERVICE AREA RESIDENT IAL VEHICLE-M ILES NON-RESIDEN T IAL SQUARE FEET5 T RANS. DEMAND FACT OR6 NON-RESIDENT IAL VEHICLE-MILES10 7.98 3.89 3.78 2.41 SERVICE AREA VEH-M ILES 4.26 Page 105 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 53 Table 6 (Continued). 10-Year Growth Projections Vehicle Miles of Increase (2020-2030) Page 106 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 54 V.TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE CALCULATION A.Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit This section presents the maximum assessable impact fee rate calculated for each service area. The maximum assessable impact fee is the sum of the eligible TIF CIP costs for the service area divided by the growth in travel attributable to new development projected to occur within the 10-year period. A majority of the components of this calculation have been described and presented in previous sections of this report. The purpose of this section is to document the computation for each service area and to demonstrate that the guidelines provided by Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code have been addressed. Table 7 illustrates the computation of the maximum assessable impact fee computed for each service area. Each row in the table is numbered to simplify explanation of the calculation. The calculation of the maximum assessable impact fee is shown in Table 8. The Transportation Impact Fee CIP consists of both roadway segment and intersection improvements. The roadway segment component is referred to as the “Transportation Impact Fee CIP,” while the intersection component is referred to as the “Intersection Impact Fee CIP.” Table 7. Maximum Assessable Transportation Impact Fee Computation Line Title Description 1 Total Vehicle-Miles of Capacity Added by the Transportation Impact Fee CIP The total number of vehicle-miles added to the service area based on the capacity, length, and number of lanes in each project (from Appendix B – Transportation Impact Fee CIP Units of Supply) Each project identified in the TIF CIP will add a certain amount of capacity to the City’s roadway network based on its length and classification. This line displays the total amount added within each service area. 2 Total Vehicle-Miles of Existing Demand A measure of the amount of traffic currently using the roadway facilities upon which capacity is being added. (from Appendix B – Transportation Impact Fee CIP Units of Supply) A number of facilities identified in the TIF CIP have traffic currently utilizing a portion of their existing capacity. This line displays the total amount of capacity along these facilities currently being used by existing traffic. 3 Total Vehicle-Miles of Existing Deficiencies Number of vehicle-miles of travel that are not accommodated by the existing roadway system (from Appendix C – Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory) In order to ensure that existing deficiencies on the City’s roadway network are not recoverable through impact fees, this line is based on the entire roadway network within the service area. Any roadway within the service area that is deficient – even those not identified on the Transportation Impact Fee CIP – will have these additional trips removed from the calculation. Page 107 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 55 4 Net Amount of Vehicle- Miles of Capacity Added A measurement of the amount of vehicle-miles added by the TIF CIP that will not be utilized by existing demand (Line 1 – Line 2 – Line 3) This calculation identifies the portion of the TIF CIP (in vehicle-miles) that may be recoverable through the collection of impact fees. 5 Total Cost of the Roadway Impact Fee CIP within the Service Area The total cost of the roadway projects within each service area (from Table 4: 10-Year Transportation Impact Fee CIP with Conceptual Level Cost Projections) This line simply identifies the total cost of all the roadway projects identified in each service area. 6 Cost of Net Capacity Supplied The total Roadway Impact Fee CIP cost (Line 5) prorated by the ratio of Net Capacity Added (Line 4) to Total Capacity Added (Line 1). [(Line 4 / Line 1) * (Line 5)] Using the ratio of vehicle-miles added by the Roadway Impact Fee CIP available to serve future growth to the total vehicle-miles added, the total cost of the TIF CIP is reduced to the amount available for future growth (i.e. excluding existing usage and deficiencies). 7 Cost to Meet Existing Needs and Usage The difference between the Total Cost of the Roadway Impact Fee CIP (Line 5) and the Cost of the Net Capacity supplied (Line 6). (Line 5 – Line 6) This line is provided for information purposes only – it is to present the portion of the total cost of the Roadway Impact Fee CIP that is required to meet existing demand. 8 Total Vehicle-Miles of New Demand over Ten Years Based upon the growth projection provided in the Land Use Assumptions, an estimate of the number of new vehicle-miles within the service area over the next ten years. (from Table 6) This line presents the amount of growth (in vehicle-miles) projected to occur within each service area over the next ten years. 9 Percent of Capacity Added Attributable to New Growth The result of dividing Total Vehicle-Miles of New Demand (Line 8) by the Net Amount of Capacity Added (Line 4), limited to 100% (Line 10). This calculation is required by Chapter 395 to ensure capacity added is attributable to new growth.10 Chapter 395 Check In order to ensure that the vehicle-miles added by the Roadway Impact Fee CIP do not exceed the amount needed to accommodate growth beyond the ten-year window, a comparison of the two values is performed. If the amount of vehicle-miles added by the Roadway Impact Fee CIP exceeds the growth projected to occur in the next ten years, the Roadway Impact Fee CIP cost is reduced accordingly. 11 Cost of Roadway Impact Fee CIP Attributable to New Growth The result of multiplying the Cost of Net Capacity Added (Line 6) by the Percent of Capacity Added Attributable to New Growth, limited to 100% (Line 10). This value is the total Roadway Impact Fee CIP project costs (excluding financial costs) that may be recovered through impact fees. This line is determined considering the limitations to impact fees required by the Texas legislature. Page 108 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 56 12 Total Cost of the Intersection Impact Fee CIP within the Service Area The total cost of the intersection projects within each service area (from Table 4: 10-Year Transportation Impact Fee Capacity Improvements Plan with Conceptual Level Cost Projections) This line simply identifies the total cost of all the intersection projects identified in each service area. 13 Percent of Intersection Capacity Added Attributable to New Growth The result of dividing Total Vehicle-Miles of New Demand (Line 8) by the vehicle-mile carrying capacity in each service area (Table 6). In order to ensure that the capacity added by the Intersection Impact Fee CIP does not exceed the amount needed to accommodate growth beyond the ten-year window, the anticipated vehicle mile growth in each service area is calculated as a percentage of the vehicle-mile carrying capacity. 14 Cost of Intersection Impact Fee CIP Attributable to New Growth The result of multiplying the Cost of Net Capacity Added (Line 12) by the Percent of Capacity Added Attributable to New Growth (Line 13). (Line 12 * Line 13) This value is the total Intersection Impact Fee CIP project cost (excluding financial costs) that may be recovered through impact fees. This line is determined considering the limitations to impact fees required by the Texas legislature. 15 Credit for Previous Contributions The total contributions by development toward the building of improvements in the Transportation Impact Fee CIP. This value is the total of all exactions upon development that resulted in a financial contribution towards future improvements in the Transportation Impact Fee CIP. This line is intended as a credit to development so as not to double charge for previous contributions for roadway capacity improvements. 16 Cost of Total Transportation Impact Fee CIP Attributable to New Growth The result of adding the Cost of the Roadway Impact Fee CIP Attributable to new growth (Line 11) to the Cost of the Intersection Impact Fee CIP Attributable to new growth (Line 14) less credits for previous contributions (Line 11 + Line 14 – Line 15). This value is the Total Transportation Impact Fee CIP project cost (excluding financial costs) that may be recovered through impact fees. This line is determined considering the limitations to impact fees required by the Texas legislature. Page 109 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 57 B.Plan for Financing and the Ad Valorem Tax Credit Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code requires the Transportation Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan for Roadway Impact Fees to contain specific enumeration of a plan for awarding the impact fee credit. Section 395.014 of the Code requires: (A)a credit for the portion of ad valorem tax and utility service revenues generated by new service units during the program period that is used for the payment of improvements, including the payment of debt, that are included in the transportation improvements plan; or (B)In the alternative, a credit equal to 50 percent of the total projected cost of implementing the transportation improvements plan…” The plan is summarized, as prepared by NewGen Strategies in Appendix D and Appendix E,Plan for Awarding the Roadway Impact Fee Credit. The following table summarizes the portions of Table 8 that utilize this credit calculation. Line Title Description 17 Pre-Credit Maximum Fee Per Service Unit Found by dividing the Cost of the CIP Attributable to New Growth (Line 16) by the Total Vehicle-Miles of New Demand Over Ten Years (Line 8). (Line 16 / Line 8) 18 Financing Costs (from Appendix D –Plan for Awarding the Transportation Impact Fee Credit) 19 Interest Earnings (from Appendix D –Plan for Awarding the Transportation Impact Fee Credit) 20 Credit for Ad Valorem Taxes A credit for the portion of ad valorem taxes projected to be generated by the new service units, as per Section 395.014 of the Local Government Code. (from Appendix E – Plan for Awarding the Transportation Impact Fee Credit) 21 Recoverable Cost of the Transportation Impact Fee CIP and Financing The Cost of the CIP Attributable to New Growth (Line 19)plus Financing Costs (Line 18), less Interesting Earnings (Line 19), less the Credit for Ad Valorem Taxes (Line 21). (Line 16 + Line 18 – Line 19 - Line 20) 22 Maximum Assessable Fee Per Service Unit Found by dividing the Recoverable Cost of the CIP and Financing (Line 21) by the Total Vehicle-Miles of New Demand Over Ten Years (Line 8). (Line 21 / Line 8) Page 110 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 58 C.Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Determination To be filled in at a later date after credits calculated. Page 111 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 59 Table 8. Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fee A B C D E F SC 1 TOTAL VEH-MI OF CAPACITY ADDED BY THE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE CIP (FROM TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE CIP SERVICE UNITS OF SUPPLY,APPENDIX B) 28,097 28,138 27,429 40,195 35,837 35,546 13,474 2 TOTAL VEH-MI OF EXISTING DEMAND (FROM TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE CIP SERVICE UNITS OF SUPPLY,APPENDIX B) 11,454 11,802 8,673 11,004 10,968 5,779 4,107 3 TOTAL VEH-MI OF EXISTING DEFICIENCIES (FROM EXISTING ROADWAY FACILITIES INVENTORY,APPENDIX C) 375 998 943 1,547 334 972 0 4 NET AMOUNT OF VEH-MI OF CAPACITY ADDED (LINE 1 - LINE 2 - LINE 3)16,268 15,338 17,813 27,644 24,535 28,795 9,367 5 TOTAL COST OF THE ROADWAY IMPACT FEE CIP AND STUDY WITHIN SERVICE AREA (FROM TABLES 5A TO 5C) $ 41,614,651 $ 45,144,651 $ 57,112,017 $ 38,637,392 $ 74,191,906 $ 111,769,651 $ 32,236,976 6 COST OF NET CAPACITY SUPPLIED (LINE 4 / LINE 1) * (LINE 5) $ 24,094,641 $ 24,608,311 $ 37,089,809 $ 26,572,760 $ 50,793,828 $ 90,542,033 $ 22,410,847 7 COST TO MEET EXISTING NEEDS AND USAGE (LINE 5 - LINE 6) $ 17,520,010 $ 20,536,340 $ 20,022,208 $ 12,064,632 $ 23,398,078 $ 21,227,618 $ 9,826,129 8 TOTAL VEH-MI OF NEW DEMAND OVER TEN YEARS (FROM TABLE 7 AND LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS)22,683 10,372 11,342 11,387 10,407 15,393 23,002 9 PERCENT OF CAPACITY ADDED ATTRIBUTABLE TO GROWTH (LINE 8 / LINE 4) 139.4%67.6%63.6%41.1%42.4%53.4%245.5% 10 IF LINE 8 > LINE 4, REDUCE LINE 9 TO 100%, OTHERWISE NO CHANGE 100.0%67.6%63.6%41.1%42.4%53.4%100.0% 11 COST OF ROADWAY IMPACT FEE CIP ATTRIBUTABLE TO GROWTH (LINE 6 * LINE 10) $ 24,094,641 $ 16,635,218 $ 23,589,119 $ 10,921,404 $ 21,536,583 $ 48,349,446 $ 22,410,847 12 TOTAL COST OF THE INTERSECTION IMPACT FEE CIP WITHIN SERVICE AREA (FROM TABLES 4A TO 4C) 19,902,500$5,150,000$13,915,500$5,820,000$19,772,500$15,910,000$5,100,000$ 13 PERCENT OF INTERSECTION CAPACITY ADDED ATTRIBUTABLE TO GROWTH (FROM TABLE 7 AND LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS) 40.4%31.0%46.2%43.7%30.2%54.3%41.2% 14 COST OF INTERSECTION IMPACT FEE CIP ATTRIBUTABLE TO GROWTH (LINE 12 * LINE 13)8,040,610$1,596,500$6,428,961$2,543,340$5,971,295$8,639,130$2,101,200$ 15 CREDIT FOR PREVIOUS CONTRIBUTIONS 150,976$257,595$85,910$71,803$1,484,313$95,981$462,929$ 16 COST OF TOTAL TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE CIP ATTRIBUTABLE TO GROWTH (LINE 11 + LINE 14 - LINE 15) 31,984,275$17,974,123$29,932,170$13,392,941$26,023,565$56,892,595$24,049,118$ 17 PRE-CREDIT MAXIMUM FEE PER SERVICE UNIT (LINE 16 / LINE 8) $ 1,410 $ 1,733 $ 2,639 $ 1,176 $ 2,501 $ 3,696 $ 1,046 18 FINANCING COSTS (FROM APPENDIX D) 19 INTEREST EARNINGS (FROM APPENDIX D) 20 CREDIT FOR AD VALOREM TAXES (FROM APPENDIX D) 21 RECOVERABLE COST OF TOTAL TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE CIP AND FINANCING (LINE 16 + LINE 18 - LINE 19 - LINE 21) 22 MAXIMUM ASSESSABLE FEE PER SERVICE UNIT (LINE 21 / LINE 8) SERVICE AREA: FINANCING AND CREDIT CALCULATION NOT INCLUDED IN THESE MAXIMUM FESES (PRE-CREDIT MAXIMUM FEES). WILL APPEAR IN FINAL REPORT. Page 112 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 60 D. Service Unit Demand Per Unit of Development The Transportation Impact Fee is determined by multiplying the impact fee rate by the number of service units projected for the proposed development. For this purpose, the City will utilize the Land Use/Vehicle-Mile Equivalency Table (LUVMET), presented in Table 9. This table lists the predominant land uses that may occur within the City of Georgetown. For each land use, the development unit that defines the development’s magnitude with respect to transportation demand is shown. Although every possible use cannot be anticipated, the majority of local uses are found in this table. The descriptions for each land use are presented in Table 10. If the exact use is not listed, one similar in trip-making characteristics can serve as a reasonable proxy. The individual land uses are grouped into categories, such as residential, office, commercial, industrial, and institutional. The trip rates presented for each land use is a fundamental component of the LUVMET. The trip rate is the average number of trips generated during the afternoon peak hour by each land use per development unit. The next column in Table 9, if applicable to the land use, presents the percentage of trips to and from certain land uses reduced by pass-by trips, as previously discussed. The definitive source of the trip generation and pass-by statistics is the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition, the latest edition. This manual utilizes trip generation studies for a variety of land uses throughout the United States, and is the standard used by traffic engineers and transportation planners for traffic impact analysis, site design, and transportation planning. However, for land uses not contained within the 10th Edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual, an alternative service unit demand could be calculated by completing a trip generation study based on the procedure identified in the ITE Trip Generation Handbook. To convert vehicle trips to vehicle-miles, it is necessary to multiply trips by trip length. The trip length values are based on the CAMPO long range transportation model and supplemented by the National Household Travel Survey performed by the FHWA. The other adjustment to trip length is the 50% origin-destination reduction to avoid double counting of trips. At this Page 113 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 61 stage, another important aspect of the state law is applied – the limit on transportation service unit demand. If the adjusted trip length is above six (6) miles, the maximum trip length used for calculation is reduced to six (6) miles. This reduction, as discussed previously, limits the maximum trip length to the approximate size of the service areas. The remaining column in the LUVMET shows the vehicle-miles per development unit. This number is the product of the trip rate and the maximum trip length. This number, previously referred to as the Transportation Demand Factor, is used in the impact fee to compute the number of service units attributed to each land use category. The number of service units is multiplied by the impact fee rate (established by City ordinance) in order to determine the impact fee for a development. Page 114 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 62 Table 9. Land Use / Vehicle-Mile Equivalency Table (LUVMET) ITE Land Use Code Development Unit Trip Gen Rate (PM) Pass- by Rate Pass-by Source Trip Rate Trip Length (mi) Adj. For O-D Adj. Trip Length (mi) Max Trip Length (mi) Veh-Mi Per Dev- Unit PORT AND TERMINAL Truck Terminal 030 1,000 SF GFA 1.87 1.87 10.70 50%5.35 5.35 10.00 INDUSTRIAL General Light Industrial 110 1,000 SF GFA 0.63 0.63 12.89 50%6.45 6.00 3.78 Industrial Park 130 1,000 SF GFA 0.40 0.40 12.89 50%6.45 6.00 2.40 Manufacturing 140 1,000 SF GFA 0.67 0.67 12.89 50%6.45 6.00 4.02 Warehousing 150 1,000 SF GFA 0.19 0.19 12.89 50%6.45 6.00 1.14 Mini-Warehouse 151 1,000 SF GFA 0.17 0.17 12.89 50%6.45 6.00 1.02 RESIDENTIAL Single-Family Detached Housing 210 Dwelling Unit 0.99 0.99 8.59 50%4.30 4.30 4.26 Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise)220 Dwelling Unit 0.56 0.56 8.59 50%4.30 4.30 2.41 Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise)221 Dwelling Unit 0.44 0.44 8.59 50%4.30 4.30 1.89 Multifamily Housing (High-Rise)222 Dwelling Unit 0.36 0.36 8.59 50%4.30 4.30 1.55 Mobile Home Park / Manufactured Hom 240 Dwelling Unit 0.46 0.46 8.59 50%4.30 4.30 1.98 Senior Adult Housing-Detached 251 Dwelling Unit 0.30 0.30 8.59 50%4.30 4.30 1.29 Senior Adult Housing-Attached 252 Dwelling Unit 0.26 0.26 8.59 50%4.30 4.30 1.12 Assisted Living 254 Beds 0.26 0.26 8.59 50%4.30 4.30 1.12 LODGING Hotel 310 Room 0.60 0.60 5.41 50%2.71 2.71 1.63 Motel / Other Lodging Facilities 320 Room 0.38 0.38 5.41 50%2.71 2.71 1.03 RECREATIONAL Golf Driving Range 432 Tee 1.25 1.25 6.35 50%3.18 3.18 3.98 Golf Course 430 Acre 0.28 0.28 6.35 50%3.18 3.18 0.89 Recreational Community Center 495 1,000 SF GFA 2.31 2.31 6.35 50%3.18 3.18 7.35 Ice Skating Rink 465 1,000 SF GFA 1.33 1.33 6.35 50%3.18 3.18 4.23 Miniature Golf Course 431 Hole 0.33 0.33 6.35 50%3.18 3.18 1.05 Multiplex Movie Theater 445 Screens 13.73 13.73 6.35 50%3.18 3.18 43.66 Racquet / Tennis Club 491 Court 3.82 3.82 6.35 50%3.18 3.18 12.15 INSTITUTIONAL Church 560 1,000 SF GFA 0.49 0.49 6.30 50%3.15 3.15 1.54 Day Care Center 565 1,000 SF GFA 11.12 44%B 6.23 3.39 50%1.70 1.70 10.59 Primary/Middle School (1-8)522 Students 0.17 0.17 3.39 50%1.70 1.70 0.29 High School 530 Students 0.14 0.14 3.39 50%1.70 1.70 0.24 Junior / Community College 540 Students 0.11 0.11 3.39 50%1.70 1.70 0.19 University / College 550 Students 0.15 0.15 3.39 50%1.70 1.70 0.26 MEDICAL Clinic 630 1,000 SF GFA 3.28 3.28 6.76 50%3.38 3.38 11.09 Hospital 610 1,000 SF GFA 0.97 0.97 6.76 50%3.38 3.38 3.28 Nursing Home 620 Beds 0.22 0.22 6.76 50%3.38 3.38 0.74 Animal Hospital/Veterinary Clinic 640 1,000 SF GFA 3.53 30%B 2.47 6.76 50%3.38 3.38 8.35 Key to Sources of Pass-by Rates: A: ITE Trip Generation Handbook 3rd Edition (August 2014) B: Estimated by Kimley-Horn based on ITE rates for similar categories C: ITE rate adjusted upward by KHA based on logical relationship to other categories Land Use Category Page 115 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 63 Table 9 (Cont’d). Land Use / Vehicle-Mile Equivalency Table (LUVMET) ITE Land Use Code Development Unit Trip Gen Rate (PM) Pass- by Rate Pass-by Source Trip Rate Trip Length (mi) Adj. For O-D Adj. Trip Length (mi) Max Trip Length (mi) Veh-Mi Per Dev- Unit OFFICE Corporate Headquarters Building 714 1,000 SF GFA 0.60 0.60 6.76 50%3.38 3.38 2.03 General Office Building 710 1,000 SF GFA 1.15 1.15 6.76 50%3.38 3.38 3.89 Medical-Dental Office Building 720 1,000 SF GFA 3.46 3.46 6.76 50%3.38 3.38 11.69 Single Tenant Office Building 715 1,000 SF GFA 1.71 1.71 6.76 50%3.38 3.38 5.78 Office Park 750 1,000 SF GFA 1.07 1.07 6.76 50%3.38 3.38 3.62 COMMERCIAL Automobile Related Automobile Care Center 942 1,000 SF GFA 3.11 40%B 1.87 5.41 50%2.71 2.71 5.07 Automobile Parts Sales 843 1,000 SF GFA 4.91 43%A 2.80 5.41 50%2.71 2.71 7.59 Gasoline/Service Station 944 Vehicle Fueling Position 14.03 42%A 8.14 1.20 50%0.60 0.60 4.88 Gasoline/Service Station w/ Conv Market and Car Wash 945 Vehicle Fueling Position 13.99 56%B 6.16 1.20 50%0.60 0.60 3.70 New Car Sales 841 1,000 SF GFA 2.43 20%B 1.94 5.41 50%2.71 2.71 5.26 Quick Lubrication Vehicle Shop 941 Servicing Positions 4.85 40%B 2.91 5.41 50%2.71 2.71 7.89 Self-Service Car Wash 947 Stall 5.54 40%B 3.32 1.20 50%0.60 0.60 1.99 Tire Store 848 1,000 SF GFA 3.98 28%A 2.87 5.41 50%2.71 2.71 7.78 Dining Fast Food Restaurant with Drive-Thru Window 934 1,000 SF GFA 32.67 50%A 16.34 3.39 50%1.70 1.70 27.78 Fast Food Restaurant without Drive-Thru Window 933 1,000 SF GFA 28.34 50%B 14.17 3.39 50%1.70 1.70 24.09 High Turnover (Sit-Down) Restaurant 932 1,000 SF GFA 9.77 43%A 5.57 5.41 50%2.71 2.71 15.09 Quality Restaurant 931 1,000 SF GFA 7.80 44%A 4.37 5.41 50%2.71 2.71 11.84 Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Thru Window 937 1,000 SF GFA 43.38 70%A 13.01 1.20 50%0.60 0.60 7.81 Other Retail Free-Standing Discount Store 815 1,000 SF GFA 4.83 30%C 3.38 6.35 50%3.18 3.18 10.75 Nursery (Garden Center)817 1,000 SF GFA 6.94 30%B 4.86 6.35 50%3.18 3.18 15.45 Home Improvement Superstore 862 1,000 SF GFA 2.33 48%A 1.21 6.35 50%3.18 3.18 3.85 Pharmacy/Drugstore w/o Drive-Thru Window 880 1,000 SF GFA 8.51 53%A 4.00 6.35 50%3.18 3.18 12.72 Pharmacy/Drugstore w/ Drive-Thru Window 881 1,000 SF GFA 10.29 49%A 5.25 6.35 50%3.18 3.18 16.70 Shopping Center 820 1,000 SF GLA 3.81 34%A 2.51 6.35 50%3.18 3.18 7.98 Supermarket 850 1,000 SF GFA 9.24 36%A 5.91 6.35 50%3.18 3.18 18.79 Toy/Children's Superstore 864 1,000 SF GFA 5.00 30%B 3.50 6.35 50%3.18 3.18 11.13 Department Store 875 1,000 SF GFA 1.95 30%B 1.37 6.35 50%3.18 3.18 4.36 SERVICES Walk-In Bank 911 1,000 SF GFA 12.13 40%B 7.28 3.39 50%1.70 1.70 12.38 Drive-In Bank 912 Drive-in Lanes 27.15 35%A 17.65 3.39 50%1.70 1.70 30.01 Hair Salon 918 1,000 SF GLA 1.45 30%B 1.02 3.39 50%1.70 1.70 1.73 Key to Sources of Pass-by Rates: A: ITE Trip Generation Handbook 3rd Edition (August 2014) B: Estimated by Kimley-Horn based on ITE rates for similar categories C: ITE rate adjusted upward by KHA based on logical relationship to other categories Land Use Category Page 116 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 64 Table 10. Land Use Descriptions ITE Land Use Code Land Use Description PORT AND TERMINAL Truck Terminal 030 Point of good transfer between trucks or between trucks and rail INDUSTRIAL General Light Industrial 110 Emphasis on activities other than manufacturing; typically employing fewer than 500 workers Industrial Park 130 Area containing a number of industries or related facilities Manufacturing 140 Warehousing 150 Devoted to storage of materials but may included office and maintenance areas Mini-Warehouse 151 Facilities with a number of units rented to others for the storage of goods RESIDENTIAL Single-Family Detached Housing 210 Single-family detached homes on individual lots Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise)220 At least 3 rental dwelling units and one or two levels (floors) per building Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise)221 At least 3 rental dwelling units and between three and ten levels (floors) per building Multifamily Housing (High-Rise)222 At least 3 rental dwelling units and more than ten levels (floors) per building Mobile Home Park / Manufactured Home 240 Senior Adult Housing-Detached 251 Consists of detached independent living developments that include amenities such as golf courses and swimming pools Senior Adult Housing-Attached 252 Consists of attached independent living developments that include limited social or recreation services Assisted Living 254 Residential settings that provide either routine general protective oversight or assistance with activities. LODGING Hotel 310 Lodging facilities that typically have on-site restaurants, lounges, meeting and/or banquet rooms, or other retail shops and services Motel / Other Lodging Facilities 320 Lodging facilities that may have small on-site restaurant or buffet area but little or no meeting space RECREATIONAL Golf Driving Range 432 Facilities with driving tees for practice; may provide individual or group lessons; may have prop shop and/or refreshment facilities Golf Course 430 May include municipal courses and private country clubs; may have driving ranges, pro shops, and restaurant/banquet facilities Recreational Community Center 495 Category includes racquet clubs, health/fitness clubs, can include facilities such as YMCA's Ice Skating Rink 465 Rinks for ice skating and related sports; may contain spectator areas and refreshment facilities Miniature Golf Course 431 One or more individual putting courses; category should not be used when part of a larger entertainment center(with batting cages, video game centers, etc) Multiplex Movie Theater 445 Movie theater with audience seating, minimum of ten screens, lobby, and refreshment area. Racquet / Tennis Club 491 Indoor or outdoor facilities specifically designed for playing tennis INSTITUTIONAL Church 560 Churches and houses of worship Day Care Center 565 Generally includes facilities for care of pre-school aged children, generally includes classrooms, offices, eating areas, and playgrounds Primary/Middle School (1-8)522 Serves students who have not yet entered high school High School 530 Serves students who have completed middle or junior high school Junior / Community College 540 Two-year junior, community, or technical colleges University / College 550 Four-year universities or colleges that may or may not offer graduate programs MEDICAL Clinic 630 Facilities with limited diagnostic and outpatient care Hospital 610 Medical and surgical facilities with overnight accommodations Nursing Home 620 Rest and convalescent homes with residents who do little or no driving Animal Hospital/Veterinary Clinic 640 Rest and convalescent homes with residents who do little or no driving OFFICE Corporate Headquarters Building 714 Office building housing corporate headquarters of a single company or organization General Office Building 710 Office buildings which house multiple tenants Medical-Dental Office Building 720 Multi-tenant building with offices for physicians and/or dentists Single Tenant Office Building 715 Single tenant office buildings other than corporate headquarters Office Park 750 Office buildings (typically low-rise) in a campus setting and served by a common roadway system Land Use Category Page 117 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 65 Table 10 (Cont’d). Land Use Descriptions ITE Land Use Code Land Use Description COMMERCIAL Automobile Related Automobile Care Center 942 Automobile repair and servicing including stereo installations and upholstering Automobile Parts Sales 843 Retail sale of auto parts but no on-site vehicle repair Gasoline/Service Station 944 Gasoline sales without convenience store or car wash; may include repair Gasoline/Service Station w/ Conv Market and Car Wash946 Gasoline sales with convenience store and car washes where the primary business is gasoline sales New Car Sales 841 New car dealerships, typically with automobile servicing, part sales, and used car sales Quick Lubrication Vehicle Shop 941 Primary business is to perform oil changes and fluid/filter changes with other repair services not provided Self-Service Car Wash 947 Has stalls for driver to park and wash the vehicle Tire Store 848 Primary business is sales and installation of tires; usually do not have large storage or warehouse area Dining Fast Food Restaurant with Drive-Thru Window 934 High-turnover fast food restaurant for carry-out and eat-in customers with a drive-thru window Fast Food Restaurant without Drive-Thru Window 933 High-turnover fast food restaurant for carry-out and eat-in customers, but without a drive-thru window High Turnover (Sit-Down) Restaurant 932 Restaurants with turnover rates less than one hour; typically includes moderately-priced chain restaurants Quality Restaurant 931 Restaurants with turnover rates of one hour or longer; typically require reservations Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Thru Window 937 Coffee and Donut restaurants with drive-through windows, hold long store hours and have limited indoor seating Other Retail Free-Standing Discount Store 815 Category includes free-standing stores with off-street parking; typically offer a variety of products and services with long store hours Nursery (Garden Center)817 Building with a yard of planting or landscape stock; may have office, storage, shipping or greenhouse facilities Home Improvement Superstore 862 Warehouse-type facilities offering a large variety of products and services including lumber, tool, paint, lighting, and fixtures, among other items. Pharmacy/Drugstore w/o Drive-Thru Window 880 Facilities that primarily sell prescription and non-prescription drugs without a drive-through window Pharmacy/Drugstore w/ Drive-Thru Window 881 Facilities that primarily sell prescription and non-prescription drugs with a drive-through window Shopping Center 820 Integrated group of commercial establishments; planning, owned, and managed as a unit Supermarket 850 Primary business is sale of groceries, food, and household cleaning items; may include photo, pharmacy, video rental, and/or ATM Toy/Children's Superstore 864 Businesses specializing in child-oriented merchandise Department Store 875 Free-standing stores that specialize in the sale of apparel, footwear, bedding, home products, jewelry, etc. SERVICES Walk-In Bank 911 Banks with their own parking lots, no drive-in lanes but contain non-drive-through ATMs Drive-In Bank 912 Banking facilities to conduct financial transactions from the vehicle; also usually apart of walk-in bank Hair Salon 918 Facilities that specialize in cosmetic and beauty services including hair cutting and styling Land Use Category Page 118 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 66 VI.SAMPLE CALCULATIONS The following section details two (2) examples of maximum assessable Transportation Impact Fee calculations. Example 1: Development Type - One (1) Unit of Single-Family Housing in Service Area A Roadway Impact Fee Calculation Steps – Example 1 Step 1 Determine Development Unit and Vehicle-Miles Per Development Unit From Table 9 [Land Use –Vehicle-Mile Equivalency Table] Development Type: 1 Dwelling Unit of Single-Family Detached Housing Number of Development Units: 1 Dwelling Unit Veh-Mi Per Development Unit:4.26 Step 2 Determine Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit (Vehicle-Mile) From Table 8, Line 17 [Maximum Assessable Fee Per Service Unit] Service Area A: $1,369 Step 3 Determine Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Impact Fee = # of Development Units * Veh-Mi Per Dev Unit * Max. Fee Per Service Unit Impact Fee = 1 * 4.26 * $1,410 Maximum Assessable Impact Fee = $6,006.60 Example 2: Development Type – 100,000 square foot Home Improvement Superstore in Service Area C Roadway Impact Fee Calculation Steps – Example 2 Step 1 Determine Development Unit and Vehicle-Miles Per Development Unit From Table 9 [Land Use –Vehicle-Mile Equivalency Table] Development Type: 100,000 square feet of Home Improvement Superstore Development Unit: 1,000 square feet of Gross Floor Area Veh-Mi Per Development Unit: 3.85 Step 2 Determine Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit (Vehicle-Mile) From Table 8,Line 17[Maximum Assessable Fee Per Service Unit] Service Area C: $2,639 Step 3 Determine Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Impact Fee = # of Development Units * Veh-Mi Per Dev Unit * Max. Fee Per Service Unit Impact Fee = 100 * 3.85 * $2,639 Maximum Assessable Impact Fee = $1,016,015 Page 119 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 67 VII.ADOPTION AND ADMINISTRATION OF ROADWAY IMPACT FEES A.Adoption Process Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code stipulates a specific process for the adoption of Roadway Impact Fees. A Capital Improvements Advisory Committee, referred to as an Impact Fee Advisory Committee (IFAC) in this report and by the City of Georgetown, is required to review the Land Use Assumptions and Transportation Impact Fees CIP used in calculating the maximum fee, and to provide the Committee’s findings for consideration by the City Council. This IFAC also reviews the calculation and resulting maximum fees and provides its findings to the City Council. The composition of the IFAC is required to adequately represent the building and development communities. The City Council then conducts a first public hearing on the Transportation Impact Fee Assumptions (Land Use and Capital Improvements Plan) and a second public hearing on the Transportation Impact Fee Calculation and Roadway Impact Fee Ordinance. Following policy adoption, the IFAC is tasked with advising the City Council of the need to update the Land Use Assumptions or the Transportation Impact Fees CIP at any time within five years of adoption. Finally, the IFAC oversees the proper administration of the Impact Fee, once in place, and advises the Council as necessary. B.Collection and Use of Transportation Impact Fees Transportation Impact Fees are assessed when a final plat is recorded. The assessment defines the impact of each unit at the time of platting, according to land use, and may not exceed the maximum impact fee allowed by law. Roadway Impact Fees are collected when a building permit is issued. Therefore, funds are not collected until development-impacts are introduced to the transportation system. Funds collected within a service area can be used only within the same service area. Finally, fees must be utilized within 10 years of collection, or must be refunded with interest. Page 120 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 68 VIII.CONCLUSIONS The City of Georgetown has established a process to implement the assessment and collection of Transportation Impact Fees through the adoption of an impact fee ordinance that is consistent with Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code. This report establishes the 2020 PRE-CREDIT maximum allowable Transportation Impact Fee that could be assessed by the City of Georgetown, as shown in the previously referenced Table 8. This document serves as a guide to the assessment of Transportation Impact Fees pertaining to future development, and the City’s need for transportation improvements to accommodate that growth. Following the public hearing process, the City Council may establish an impact fee amount to be collected, up to the calculated maximum and establish the Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance accordingly. In conclusion, it is our opinion that the data and methodology used in this analysis are appropriate and consistent with Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code. Furthermore, the Land Use Assumptions and the proposed Transportation Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan are appropriately incorporated into the development of the PRE-CREDIT maximum assessable Transportation Impact Fee. Below is the listing of the 2020 PRE-CREDIT Transportation Impact Fee Study’s Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit (Vehicle-Mile): Service Area Maximum Fee Per Service Unit (per Vehicle-Mile) A $1,410 B $1,733 C $2,639 D $1,176 E $2,501 F $3,696 SC $1,046 Page 121 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT 69 APPENDICES A. Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections SERVICE AREA A SERVICE AREA B SERVICE AREA C SERVICE AREA D SERVICE AREA E SERVICE AREA F SERVICE AREA SC B. Transportation Impact Fee CIP Service Units of Supply C. Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory D. Plan for Awarding the Street Impact Fee Credit Summary E. Plan for Awarding the Street Impact Fee Credit Supporting Exhibits Page 122 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT A Appendix A – Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 123 of 276 Roadway Improvements - Service Area A From To A-1 4 Lane Major Arterial SHELL RD (1)SH 195 WB 1200' S OF SH 195 50%320,000$160,000$ A-2 4 Lane Major Arterial SHELL RD (2)1200' S OF SH 195 200' S OF SHELL STONE TRL 100%300,000$300,000$ A-3 4 Lane Major Arterial SHELL RD (3)200' S OF SHELL STONE TRL SCENIC OAKS DR 50%320,000$160,000$ A-4 4 Lane Major Arterial SHELL RD (4)SCENIC OAKS DR 2015' S OF SCENIC OAKS DR 100%760,000$760,000$ A-5 4 Lane Major Arterial SHELL RD (5)2015' S OF SCENIC OAKS DR 4315' S OF SCENIC OAKS DR 50%980,000$490,000$ A-6 4 Lane Major Arterial SHELL RD (6)4315' S OF SCENIC OAKS DR 4790' S OF SCENIC OAKS DR 100%300,000$300,000$ A-7 4 Lane Major Arterial SHELL RD (7)4790' S OF SCENIC OAKS DR 5170' S OF SCENIC OAKS DR 50%300,000$150,000$ A-8 4 Lane Major Arterial SHELL RD (8)1870' S OF SHELL SPUR 5170' S OF SCENIC OAKS DR 100%1,140,000$1,140,000$ A-9 4 Lane Major Arterial SHELL RD (9)900' S OF BOWLINE DR 300' N OF SYCAMORE ST 50%980,000$490,000$ A-10 4 Lane Minor Arterial BERRY CREEK DR AIRPORT RD SH 195 100%4,900,000$4,900,000$ A-11 4 Lane Minor Arterial AIRPORT RD (1)BERRY CREEK DR 475' N OF INDIAN MOUND RD 100%2,300,000$2,300,000$ A-12 4 Lane Minor Arterial AIRPORT RD (2)475' N OF INDIAN MOUND RD 500' N OF SANALOMA DR 50%6,700,000$3,350,000$ A-13 4 Lane Minor Arterial AIRPORT RD (3)CAVU RD 300' S OF VORTAC LN 50%2,200,000$1,100,000$ A-14 4 Lane Minor Arterial AIRPORT RD (4)300' S OF VORTAC LN LAKEWAY DR 100%5,900,000$5,900,000$ A-15 4 Lane Collector LAKEWAY DR NORTHWEST BLVD AIRPORT RD 100%6,000,000$6,000,000$ A-16 4 Lane Major Arterial SHELL RD (10)500' N OF BOWLINE DR 200' N OF SYCAMORE ST 50%680,000$340,000$ A-17 4 Lane Major Arterial SHELL RD (11)300' N OF SYCAMORE ST 600' N OF BELLAIRE DR 100%380,000$380,000$ A-18 4 Lane Major Arterial SHELL RD (12)600' N OF BELLAIRE DR VERDE VISTA 100%1,160,000$1,160,000$ A-19 4 Lane Collector SHELL RD (13)VERDE VISTA 500' N OF WILLIAMS DR 100%380,000$380,000$ A-20 4 Lane Collector VERDE VISTA WILLIAMS DR 1500' E OF WILLIAMS DR 100%2,000,000$2,000,000$ A-21 3 Lane Collector WILDWOOD DR VERDE VISTA DR WILLIAMS DR 100%1,000,000$1,000,000$ A-22; B-1 Access Management WILLIAMS DR (2)400' N OF BETTIE MAE WAY 1200' E OF COUNTRY RD 50%2,600,000$1,300,000$ A-23;B-2 Access Management WILLIAMS DR (3)900' E OF LA PALOMA DR COUNTRY RD 50%1,100,000$550,000$ A-24; B-3 Access Management WILLIAMS DR (4)COUNTRY RD S IH 35 SB 50%2,900,000$1,450,000$ A-25 3 Lane Collector LAKEWAY DR WHISPER OAKS LN WILLIAMS DR 100%1,200,000$1,200,000$ A-26 4 Lane Minor Arterial RIVERY BLVD NORTHWEST BLVD WILLIAMS DRIVE 100%4,335,000$4,335,000$ 51,135,000$41,595,000$TOTAL City of Georgetown - 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Capital Improvement Plan for Transportation Impact Fees Summary of Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections #IF Class Project Limits Percent in Service Area Project Cost Total Cost in Service Area 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Georgetown, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections PRE-CREDIT DRAFT Page 124 of 276 City of Georgetown - 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Capital Improvement Plan for Transportation Impact Fees Summary of Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Intersection Improvements - Service Area A Improvement 1 Improvement 2 AI-1 INNOVATIVE -25%10,000,000$2,500,000$ AI-2 SIGNAL -100%500,000$500,000$ AI-3 TURN LANE -50%200,000$100,000$ AI-4 TURN LANE -50%200,000$100,000$ AI-5 SIGNAL -50%500,000$250,000$ AI-6 TURN LANE TURN LANE 50%140,000$70,000$ AI-7 ROUNDABOUT TURN LANE 50%2,070,000$1,035,000$ AI-8 SIGNAL -50%500,000$250,000$ AI-9;CI-1 SIGNAL -50%500,000$250,000$ AI-10 ROUNDABOUT -25%2,000,000$500,000$ AI-11 SIGNAL -100%500,000$500,000$ AI-12;BI-1 TURN LANE -50%400,000$200,000$ AI-13;BI-2 TURN LANE -50%400,000$200,000$ AI-14;BI-3 SIGNAL TURN LANE 50%900,000$450,000$ AI-15;BI-4 TURN LANE -50%400,000$200,000$ AI-16;BI-5 TURN LANE -50%400,000$200,000$ AI-17;BI-6 TURN LANE -50%400,000$200,000$ AI-18 ROUNDABOUT -100%2,000,000$2,000,000$ AI-19 ROUNDABOUT -100%2,000,000$2,000,000$ AI-20;CI-4 OVERPASS -50%10,115,000$5,057,500$ AI-21 OTHER -16.7%20,000,000$3,340,000$ 54,125,000$19,902,500$ WILDWOOD DRIVE AND VERDE VISTA VERDE VISTA DRIVE AND SHELL ROAD WOODLAKE DRIVE AND WILLIAMS DRIVE N IH 35 AND NORTHWEST BLVD ITS SYSTEM UPGRADES ESTRELLA CROSSING AND WILLIAMS DRIVE SERENADA DRIVE AND WILLIAMS DRIVE WILLIAMS DRIVE AND LAKEWAY DRIVE RIVER BEND AND WILLIAMS DRIVE LAKEWAY DRIVE AND NORTHWEST BLVD NORTHWEST BLVD AND GOLDEN OAKS DRIVE IH35/SH195 RAMP AND FRONTAGE TOTAL BELLAIRE DRIVE AND SHELL ROAD LUNA TRAIL AND SERENADA DRIVE NORTHWEST BLVD AND SERENADA DR WILDWOOD DRIVE AND WILLIAMS DRIVE N IH 35 FRONTAGE AND SH 130 FRONTAGE N IH 35 FRONTAGE AND SH 130 FRONTAGE Total Cost in Service Area IH35/SH195 RAMP AND FRONTAGE #Project Improvement Percent in Service Area SH 195 AND SHELL RD BERRY CREEK DR AND SH 195 Project Cost 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Georgetown, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections PRE-CREDIT DRAFT Page 125 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.A-1 Name:SHELL RD (1) Limits:SH 195 WB to 1200' S OF SH 195 Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):590 Service Area(s):A,ETJ/OTHER Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Street Excavation 2,643 cy 15.00$40,000$ 205 6" Asphalt (Type C)1,125 ton 110.00$124,000$ 305 16" Base 1,922 cy 40.00$77,000$ 405 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 505 6' Concrete Sidewalk 7,077 sf 5.00$35,000$ 605 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 2,359 lf 16.00$38,000$ 705 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:639,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%32,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%13,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%224,000$ √Illumination 5%32,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%13,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%13,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%13,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%32,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%51,120$ √Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:423,120$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:1,062,120$ Construction Contingency:15%159,000$ Mobilization 8%85,000$ Prep ROW 5%53,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:1,400,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-1,400,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%224,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution)320,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 126 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.A-2 Name:SHELL RD (2) Limits:1200' S OF SH 195 to 200' S OF SHELL STONE TRL Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):495 Service Area(s):A Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Street Excavation 2,220 cy 15.00$33,000$ 205 6" Asphalt (Type C)944 ton 110.00$104,000$ 305 16" Base 1,614 cy 40.00$65,000$ 405 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 505 6' Concrete Sidewalk 5,944 sf 5.00$30,000$ 605 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 1,981 lf 16.00$32,000$ 705 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:589,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%29,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%12,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%206,000$ √Illumination 5%29,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%12,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%12,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%12,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%29,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%47,120$ √Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:388,120$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:977,120$ Construction Contingency:15%147,000$ Mobilization 8%78,000$ Prep ROW 5%49,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:1,300,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-1,300,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%208,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution)300,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 127 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.A-3 Name:SHELL RD (3) Limits:200' S OF SHELL STONE TRL to SCENIC OAKS DR Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):602 Service Area(s):A,ETJ/OTHER Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Street Excavation 2,698 cy 15.00$40,000$ 205 6" Asphalt (Type C)1,148 ton 110.00$126,000$ 305 16" Base 1,962 cy 40.00$78,000$ 405 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 505 6' Concrete Sidewalk 7,225 sf 5.00$36,000$ 605 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 2,408 lf 16.00$39,000$ 705 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:644,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%32,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%13,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%225,000$ √Illumination 5%32,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%13,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%13,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%13,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%32,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%51,520$ √Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:424,520$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:1,068,520$ Construction Contingency:15%160,000$ Mobilization 8%85,000$ Prep ROW 5%53,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:1,400,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-1,400,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%224,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution)320,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 128 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.A-4 Name:SHELL RD (4) Limits:SCENIC OAKS DR to 2015' S OF SCENIC OAKS DR Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):2,015 Service Area(s):A Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Street Excavation 9,030 cy 15.00$135,000$ 205 6" Asphalt (Type C)3,842 ton 110.00$423,000$ 305 16" Base 6,567 cy 40.00$263,000$ 405 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 505 6' Concrete Sidewalk 24,179 sf 5.00$121,000$ 605 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 8,060 lf 16.00$129,000$ 705 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:1,396,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%70,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%28,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%489,000$ √Illumination 5%70,000$ √Special Drainage Structures Minor Stream Crossing 200,000$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%28,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%28,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%28,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%70,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%111,680$ √Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:1,122,680$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:2,518,680$ Construction Contingency:15%378,000$ Mobilization 8%201,000$ Prep ROW 5%126,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:3,300,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-3,300,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%528,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution)760,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. This project consists the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. Description: NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 129 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.A-5 Name:SHELL RD (5) Limits:2015' S OF SCENIC OAKS DR to 4315' S OF SCENIC OAKS DR Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):2,301 Service Area(s):A,ETJ/OTHER Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Street Excavation 10,311 cy 15.00$155,000$ 205 6" Asphalt (Type C)4,387 ton 110.00$483,000$ 305 16" Base 7,499 cy 40.00$300,000$ 405 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 505 6' Concrete Sidewalk 27,610 sf 5.00$138,000$ 605 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 9,203 lf 16.00$147,000$ 705 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:1,548,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%77,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%31,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%542,000$ √Illumination 5%77,000$ √Special Drainage Structures Bridge Crossing 700,000$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%31,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%31,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%31,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%77,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%123,840$ √Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:1,720,840$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:3,268,840$ Construction Contingency:15%490,000$ Mobilization 8%262,000$ Prep ROW 5%163,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:4,200,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-4,200,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%672,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution)980,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. This project consists the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. Description: NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 130 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.A-6 Name:SHELL RD (6) Limits:4315' S OF SCENIC OAKS DR to 4790' S OF SCENIC OAKS DR Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):475 Service Area(s):A Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Street Excavation 2,130 cy 15.00$32,000$ 205 6" Asphalt (Type C)906 ton 110.00$100,000$ 305 16" Base 1,549 cy 40.00$62,000$ 405 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 505 6' Concrete Sidewalk 5,704 sf 5.00$29,000$ 605 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 1,901 lf 16.00$30,000$ 705 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:578,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%29,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%12,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%202,000$ √Illumination 5%29,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%12,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%12,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%12,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%29,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%46,240$ √Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:383,240$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:961,240$ Construction Contingency:15%144,000$ Mobilization 8%77,000$ Prep ROW 5%48,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:1,300,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-1,300,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%208,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution)300,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 131 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.A-7 Name:SHELL RD (7) Limits:4790' S OF SCENIC OAKS DR to 5170' S OF SCENIC OAKS DR Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):480 Service Area(s):A,ETJ/OTHER Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Street Excavation 2,150 cy 15.00$32,000$ 205 6" Asphalt (Type C)915 ton 110.00$101,000$ 305 16" Base 1,564 cy 40.00$63,000$ 405 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 505 6' Concrete Sidewalk 5,758 sf 5.00$29,000$ 605 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 1,919 lf 16.00$31,000$ 705 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:581,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%29,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%12,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%203,000$ √Illumination 5%29,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%12,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%12,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%12,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%29,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%46,480$ √Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:384,480$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:965,480$ Construction Contingency:15%145,000$ Mobilization 8%77,000$ Prep ROW 5%48,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:1,300,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-1,300,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%208,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution)300,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 132 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.A-8 Name:SHELL RD (8) Limits:1870' S OF SHELL SPUR to 5170' S OF SCENIC OAKS DR Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):3,727 Service Area(s):A,ETJ/OTHER Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Street Excavation 16,703 cy 15.00$251,000$ 205 6" Asphalt (Type C)7,106 ton 110.00$782,000$ 305 16" Base 12,148 cy 40.00$486,000$ 405 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 505 6' Concrete Sidewalk 44,725 sf 5.00$224,000$ 605 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 14,908 lf 16.00$239,000$ 705 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:2,307,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%115,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%46,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%807,000$ √Illumination 5%115,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%46,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%46,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%46,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%115,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%184,560$ √Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:1,520,560$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:3,827,560$ Construction Contingency:15%574,000$ Mobilization 8%306,000$ Prep ROW 5%191,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:4,900,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-4,900,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%784,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution)1,140,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 133 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.A-9 Name:SHELL RD (9) Limits:900' S OF BOWLINE DR to 300' N OF SYCAMORE ST Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):2,799 Service Area(s):A Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Street Excavation 12,543 cy 15.00$188,000$ 205 6" Asphalt (Type C)5,336 ton 110.00$587,000$ 305 16" Base 9,122 cy 40.00$365,000$ 405 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 505 6' Concrete Sidewalk 33,585 sf 5.00$168,000$ 605 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 11,195 lf 16.00$179,000$ 705 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:1,812,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%91,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%36,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%634,000$ √Illumination 5%91,000$ √Special Drainage Structures Minor Stream Crossing 200,000$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%36,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%36,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%36,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%91,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%144,960$ √Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:1,395,960$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:3,207,960$ Construction Contingency:15%481,000$ Mobilization 8%257,000$ Prep ROW 5%160,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:4,200,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-4,200,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%672,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution)980,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 134 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.A-10 Name:BERRY CREEK DR Limits:AIRPORT RD to SH 195 Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Minor Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):3,709 Service Area(s):A Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Street Excavation 12,088 cy 15.00$181,000$ 202 4" Asphalt (Type C)4,715 ton 110.00$519,000$ 302 12" Base 9,066 cy 40.00$363,000$ 402 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 502 6' Concrete Sidewalk 44,508 sf 5.00$223,000$ 602 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 14,836 lf 16.00$237,000$ 702 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:1,848,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%92,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%37,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%647,000$ √Illumination 5%92,000$ √Special Drainage Structures Minor Stream Crossing 200,000$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%37,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%37,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%37,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%92,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%147,840$ √Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:1,418,840$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:3,266,840$ Construction Contingency:15%490,000$ Mobilization 8%261,000$ Prep ROW 5%163,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:4,200,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-4,200,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%672,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:4,900,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 135 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.A-11 Name:AIRPORT RD (1) Limits:BERRY CREEK DR to 475' N OF INDIAN MOUND RD Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Minor Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):560 Service Area(s):A Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Street Excavation 1,825 cy 15.00$27,000$ 202 4" Asphalt (Type C)712 ton 110.00$78,000$ 302 12" Base 1,369 cy 40.00$55,000$ 402 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 502 6' Concrete Sidewalk 6,721 sf 5.00$34,000$ 602 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 2,240 lf 16.00$36,000$ 702 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:555,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%28,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%11,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%194,000$ √Illumination 5%28,000$ √Special Drainage Structures Bridge Crossing 600,000$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%11,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%11,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%11,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%28,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%44,400$ √Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:966,400$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:1,521,400$ Construction Contingency:15%228,000$ Mobilization 8%122,000$ Prep ROW 5%76,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:2,000,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-2,000,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%320,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:2,300,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 136 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.A-12 Name:AIRPORT RD (2) Limits:475' N OF INDIAN MOUND RD to 500' N OF SANALOMA DR Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Minor Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):3,630 Service Area(s):A,ETJ/OTHER Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Street Excavation 11,830 cy 15.00$177,000$ 202 4" Asphalt (Type C)4,614 ton 110.00$507,000$ 302 12" Base 8,872 cy 40.00$355,000$ 402 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 502 6' Concrete Sidewalk 43,555 sf 5.00$218,000$ 602 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 14,518 lf 16.00$232,000$ 702 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:1,814,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%91,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%36,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%635,000$ √Illumination 5%91,000$ √Special Drainage Structures Bridge Crossing 1,500,000$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%36,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%36,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%36,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%91,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%145,120$ √Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:2,697,120$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:4,511,120$ Construction Contingency:15%677,000$ Mobilization 8%361,000$ Prep ROW 5%226,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:5,800,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-5,800,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%928,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:6,700,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 137 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.A-13 Name:AIRPORT RD (3) Limits:CAVU RD to 300' S OF VORTAC LN Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Minor Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):1,299 Service Area(s):A,ETJ/OTHER Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Street Excavation 4,233 cy 15.00$63,000$ 202 4" Asphalt (Type C)1,651 ton 110.00$182,000$ 302 12" Base 3,175 cy 40.00$127,000$ 402 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 502 6' Concrete Sidewalk 15,586 sf 5.00$78,000$ 602 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 5,195 lf 16.00$83,000$ 702 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:858,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%43,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%17,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%300,000$ √Illumination 5%43,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%17,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%17,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%17,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%43,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%68,640$ √Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:565,640$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:1,423,640$ Construction Contingency:15%214,000$ Mobilization 8%114,000$ Prep ROW 5%71,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:1,900,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-1,900,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%304,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:2,200,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 138 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.A-14 Name:AIRPORT RD (4) Limits:300' S OF VORTAC LN to LAKEWAY DR Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Minor Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):5,033 Service Area(s):A Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Street Excavation 16,403 cy 15.00$246,000$ 202 4" Asphalt (Type C)6,397 ton 110.00$704,000$ 302 12" Base 12,302 cy 40.00$492,000$ 402 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 502 6' Concrete Sidewalk 60,394 sf 5.00$302,000$ 602 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 20,131 lf 16.00$322,000$ 702 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:2,391,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%120,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%48,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%837,000$ √Illumination 5%120,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%48,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%48,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%48,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%120,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%191,280$ √Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:1,580,280$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:3,971,280$ Construction Contingency:15%596,000$ Mobilization 8%318,000$ Prep ROW 5%199,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:5,100,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-5,100,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%816,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:5,900,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 139 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.A-15 Name:LAKEWAY DR Limits:NORTHWEST BLVD to AIRPORT RD Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Collector Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):5,949 Service Area(s):A Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 106 Unclassified Street Excavation 12,118 cy 15.00$182,000$ 206 2" Asphalt (Type C)3,781 ton 110.00$416,000$ 306 8" Base 9,694 cy 40.00$388,000$ 406 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 506 6' Concrete Sidewalk 71,386 sf 5.00$357,000$ 606 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 23,795 lf 16.00$381,000$ 706 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:2,049,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%102,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%41,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%717,000$ √Illumination 5%102,000$ √Special Drainage Structures Bridge Crossing 600,000$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%41,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%41,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%41,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%102,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%163,920$ √Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:1,950,920$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:3,999,920$ Construction Contingency:15%600,000$ Mobilization 8%320,000$ Prep ROW 5%200,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:5,200,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-5,200,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%832,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:6,000,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided collector. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 140 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.A-16 Name:SHELL RD (10) Limits:500' N OF BOWLINE DR to 200' N OF SYCAMORE ST Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):1,879 Service Area(s):A Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Street Excavation 8,422 cy 15.00$126,000$ 205 6" Asphalt (Type C)3,583 ton 110.00$394,000$ 305 16" Base 6,125 cy 40.00$245,000$ 405 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 505 6' Concrete Sidewalk 22,551 sf 5.00$113,000$ 605 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 7,517 lf 16.00$120,000$ 705 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:1,323,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%66,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%26,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%463,000$ √Illumination 5%66,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%26,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%26,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%26,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%66,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%105,840$ √Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:870,840$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:2,193,840$ Construction Contingency:15%329,000$ Mobilization 8%176,000$ Prep ROW 5%110,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:2,900,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-2,900,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%464,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution)680,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 141 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.A-17 Name:SHELL RD (11) Limits:300' N OF SYCAMORE ST to 600' N OF BELLAIRE DR Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):759 Service Area(s):A,ETJ/OTHER Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Street Excavation 3,402 cy 15.00$51,000$ 205 6" Asphalt (Type C)1,448 ton 110.00$159,000$ 305 16" Base 2,474 cy 40.00$99,000$ 405 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 505 6' Concrete Sidewalk 9,110 sf 5.00$46,000$ 605 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 3,037 lf 16.00$49,000$ 705 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:729,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%36,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%15,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%255,000$ √Illumination 5%36,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%15,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%15,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%15,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%36,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%58,320$ √Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:481,320$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:1,210,320$ Construction Contingency:15%182,000$ Mobilization 8%97,000$ Prep ROW 5%61,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:1,600,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-1,600,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%256,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution)380,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 142 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.A-18 Name:SHELL RD (12) Limits:600' N OF BELLAIRE DR to VERDE VISTA Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):3,784 Service Area(s):A Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Street Excavation 16,956 cy 15.00$254,000$ 205 6" Asphalt (Type C)7,214 ton 110.00$794,000$ 305 16" Base 12,332 cy 40.00$493,000$ 405 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 505 6' Concrete Sidewalk 45,404 sf 5.00$227,000$ 605 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 15,135 lf 16.00$242,000$ 705 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:2,335,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%117,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%47,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%817,000$ √Illumination 5%117,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%47,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%47,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%47,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%117,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%186,800$ √Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:1,542,800$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:3,877,800$ Construction Contingency:15%582,000$ Mobilization 8%310,000$ Prep ROW 5%194,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:5,000,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-5,000,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%800,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution)1,160,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 143 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.A-19 Name:SHELL RD (13) Limits:VERDE VISTA to 500' N OF WILLIAMS DR Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Collector Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):1,396 Service Area(s):A Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 106 Unclassified Street Excavation 2,844 cy 15.00$43,000$ 206 2" Asphalt (Type C)887 ton 110.00$98,000$ 306 8" Base 2,275 cy 40.00$91,000$ 406 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 506 6' Concrete Sidewalk 16,756 sf 5.00$84,000$ 606 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 5,585 lf 16.00$89,000$ 706 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:730,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%37,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%15,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%256,000$ √Illumination 5%37,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%15,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%15,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%15,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%37,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%58,400$ √Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:485,400$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:1,215,400$ Construction Contingency:15%182,000$ Mobilization 8%97,000$ Prep ROW 5%61,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:1,600,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-1,600,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%256,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution)380,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided collector. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 144 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/11/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.A-20 Name:VERDE VISTA Limits:WILLIAMS DR to 1500' E OF WILLIAMS DR Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Collector Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):1,478 Service Area(s):A Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 106 Unclassified Street Excavation 3,011 cy 15.00$45,000$ 206 2" Asphalt (Type C)940 ton 110.00$103,000$ 306 8" Base 2,409 cy 40.00$96,000$ 406 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 506 6' Concrete Sidewalk 17,739 sf 5.00$89,000$ 606 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 5,913 lf 16.00$95,000$ 706 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:753,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%38,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%15,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%264,000$ √Illumination 5%38,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%15,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%15,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%15,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%38,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%60,240$ √Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:498,240$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:1,251,240$ Construction Contingency:15%188,000$ Mobilization 8%100,000$ Prep ROW 5%63,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:1,700,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-1,700,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%272,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:2,000,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. This project consists of construction of a new 4 lane divided collector. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 145 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.A-21 Name:WILDWOOD DR Limits:VERDE VISTA DR to WILLIAMS DR Impact Fee Class:3 Lane Collector Ultimate Class:3U Length (lf):1,645 Service Area(s):A Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Street Excavation 2,081 cy 15.00$31,000$ 203 2" Asphalt (Type C)684 ton 110.00$75,000$ 303 8" Base 1,665 cy 40.00$67,000$ 403 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 503 6' Concrete Sidewalk 19,738 sf 5.00$99,000$ 603 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 6,579 lf 16.00$105,000$ 703 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 0 sy 101.59$-$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:377,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%19,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%8,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%132,000$ √Illumination 5%19,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%8,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%8,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%8,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%19,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%30,160$ √Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:251,160$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:628,160$ Construction Contingency:15%94,000$ Mobilization 8%50,000$ Prep ROW 5%31,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:900,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-900,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%144,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:1,000,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 3 lane undivided collector. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 146 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.A-22; B-1 Name:WILLIAMS DR (2) Limits:400' N OF BETTIE MAE WAY to 1200' E OF COUNTRY RD Impact Fee Class:Access Management Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):10,796 Service Area(s):A,B Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 104 Unclassified Street Excavation 13,195 cy 15.00$198,000$ 204 Asphalt (Type C)0 ton 110.00$-$ 304 Base 0 cy 40.00$-$ 404 Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 504 6' Concrete Sidewalk 0 sf 5.00$-$ 604 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 21,593 lf 16.00$345,000$ 704 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:868,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%43,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%17,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%304,000$ √Illumination 5%43,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%17,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%17,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%17,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%43,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%69,440$ √Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:570,440$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:1,438,440$ Construction Contingency:15%216,000$ Mobilization 8%115,000$ Prep ROW 5%72,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:1,900,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-1,900,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%304,000$ Previous City contribution 374,563$ Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:2,600,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the construction of a median in the existing center turn lane. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 147 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.A-23;B-2 Name:WILLIAMS DR (3) Limits:900' E OF LA PALOMA DR to COUNTRY RD Impact Fee Class:Access Management Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):1,183 Service Area(s):A,B Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 104 Unclassified Street Excavation 1,446 cy 15.00$22,000$ 204 Asphalt (Type C)0 ton 110.00$-$ 304 Base 0 cy 40.00$-$ 404 Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 504 6' Concrete Sidewalk 0 sf 5.00$-$ 604 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 2,365 lf 16.00$38,000$ 704 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:385,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%19,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%8,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%135,000$ √Illumination 5%19,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%8,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%8,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%8,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%19,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%30,800$ √Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:254,800$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:639,800$ Construction Contingency:15%96,000$ Mobilization 8%51,000$ Prep ROW 5%32,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:900,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-900,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%144,000$ Previous City contribution 41,044$ Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:1,100,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the construction of a median in the existing center turn lane. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 148 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.A-24; B-3 Name:WILLIAMS DR (4) Limits:COUNTRY RD to S IH 35 SB Impact Fee Class:Access Management Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):12,698 Service Area(s):A,B Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 104 Unclassified Street Excavation 15,520 cy 15.00$233,000$ 204 Asphalt (Type C)0 ton 110.00$-$ 304 Base 0 cy 40.00$-$ 404 Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 504 6' Concrete Sidewalk 0 sf 5.00$-$ 604 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 25,396 lf 16.00$406,000$ 704 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:964,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%48,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%19,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%337,000$ √Illumination 5%48,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%19,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%19,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%19,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%48,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%77,120$ √Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:634,120$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:1,598,120$ Construction Contingency:15%240,000$ Mobilization 8%128,000$ Prep ROW 5%80,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:2,100,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-2,100,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%336,000$ Previous City contribution 440,552$ Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:2,900,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the construction of a median in the existing center turn lane. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 149 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.A-25 Name:LAKEWAY DR Limits:WHISPER OAKS LN to WILLIAMS DR Impact Fee Class:3 Lane Collector Ultimate Class:3U Length (lf):2,022 Service Area(s):A Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Street Excavation 2,559 cy 15.00$38,000$ 203 2" Asphalt (Type C)840 ton 110.00$92,000$ 303 8" Base 2,047 cy 40.00$82,000$ 403 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 503 6' Concrete Sidewalk 24,269 sf 5.00$121,000$ 603 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 8,090 lf 16.00$129,000$ 703 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 0 sy 101.59$-$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:462,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%23,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%9,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%162,000$ √Illumination 5%23,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%9,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%9,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%9,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%23,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%36,960$ √Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:303,960$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:765,960$ Construction Contingency:15%115,000$ Mobilization 8%61,000$ Prep ROW 5%38,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:1,000,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-1,000,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%160,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:1,200,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 3 lane undivided collector. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 150 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.A-26 Name:RIVERY BLVD Limits:NORTHWEST BLVD to WILLIAMS DRIVE Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Minor Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):2,799 Service Area(s):A Roadway Construction Cost Projection √Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:4,335,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided collector. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 151 of 276 Roadway Improvements - Service Area B From To A-22; B-1 Access Management WILLIAMS DR (2)400' N OF BETTIE MAE WAY 1200' E OF COUNTRY RD 50%2,600,000$1,300,000$ A-23;B-2 Access Management WILLIAMS DR (3)900' E OF LA PALOMA DR COUNTRY RD 50%1,100,000$550,000$ A-24; B-3 Access Management WILLIAMS DR (4)COUNTRY RD S IH 35 SB 50%2,900,000$1,450,000$ B-4 Previously Constructed D B WOOD RD (1)WILLIAMS DR 1300' S OF WILLIAMS DR 100%2,145,000$2,145,000$ B-5 Access Management D B WOOD RD (2)1800' S OF WILLIAMS DR 3200' S OF WILLIAMS DR 50%1,000,000$500,000$ B-6 4 Lane Major Arterial D B WOOD RD (3)3200' S OF WILLIAMS DR CEDAR BREAKS RD 50%15,900,000$7,950,000$ B-7 4 Lane Major Arterial D B WOOD RD (4)CEDAR BREAKS RD W UNIVERSITY AVE 100%14,800,000$14,800,000$ B-8 3 Lane Collector COUNTRY RD WILLIAMS DR 500' S OF RUSTLE CV 50%1,200,000$600,000$ B-9 3 Lane Collector BOOTYS CROSSING RD 400' W OF PECAN LN WILLIAMS DR 100%4,500,000$4,500,000$ B-10 4 Lane Collector WOLF RANCH PKWY RIVERY BLVD MEMORIAL DRIVE 100%6,100,000$6,100,000$ B-11 3 Lane Collector MEMORIAL DRIVE (1)RIVR CHASE BLVD WOLF RANCH PKWY 100%1,300,000$1,300,000$ B-12 4 Lane Collector MEMORIAL DRIVE (2)WOLF RANCH PKWY WOLF LAKES DR 100%2,000,000$2,000,000$ B-13; D-3 6 Lane Major Arterial W SH 29 (3)WOOD CT WOLF RANCH PKWY 50%1,540,000$770,000$ B-14; D-4 6 Lane Major Arterial W UNIVERSITY AVE WOLF RANCH PKWY SCENIC DR 50%2,320,000$1,160,000$ 59,405,000$45,125,000$ Intersection Improvements - Service Area B Improvement 1 Improvement 2 AI-12;BI-1 TURN LANE -50%400,000$200,000$ AI-13;BI-2 TURN LANE -50%400,000$200,000$ AI-14;BI-3 SIGNAL TURN LANE 25%900,000$225,000$ AI-15;BI-4 TURN LANE -50%400,000$200,000$ AI-16;BI-5 TURN LANE -50%400,000$200,000$ AI-17;BI-6 TURN LANE -50%400,000$200,000$ BI-7 TURN LANE TURN LANE 75%400,000$300,000$ BI-8;DI-1 SIGNAL -50%500,000$250,000$ BI-9;DI-2 TURN LANE TURN LANE 25%140,000$35,000$ BI-10 OTHER -16.7%20,000,000$3,340,000$ 23,940,000$5,150,000$ City of Georgetown - 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Capital Improvement Plan for Transportation Impact Fees Summary of Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections #IF Class Project Limits Percent in Service Area Project Cost Total Cost in Service Area TOTAL #Project Improvement Percent in Service Area Project Cost Total Cost in Service Area SERENADA DRIVE AND WILLIAMS DRIVE WOODLAKE DRIVE AND WILLIAMS DRIVE WILDWOOD DRIVE AND WILLIAMS DRIVE ESTRELLA CROSSING AND WILLIAMS DRIVE WILLIAMS DRIVE AND LAKEWAY DRIVE RIVER BEND AND WILLIAMS DRIVE TOTAL NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this Appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. These planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. ITS SYSTEM UPGRADE SCENIC DRIVE AND UNIVERSITY AVE DB WOOD ROAD AND CEDAR BREAKS DRIVE DB WOOD ROAD AND SH 29 (UNIVERSITY) 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Georgetown, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections PRE-CREDIT DRAFT Page 152 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.A-22; B-1 Name:WILLIAMS DR (2) Limits:400' N OF BETTIE MAE WAY to 1200' E OF COUNTRY RD Impact Fee Class:Access Management Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):10,796 Service Area(s):A,B Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 104 Unclassified Street Excavation 13,195 cy 15.00$198,000$ 204 Asphalt (Type C)0 ton 110.00$-$ 304 Base 0 cy 40.00$-$ 404 Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 504 6' Concrete Sidewalk 0 sf 5.00$-$ 604 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 21,593 lf 16.00$345,000$ 704 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:868,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%43,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%17,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%304,000$ √Illumination 5%43,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%17,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%17,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%17,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%43,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%69,440$ √Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:570,440$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:1,438,440$ Construction Contingency:15%216,000$ Mobilization 8%115,000$ Prep ROW 5%72,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:1,900,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-1,900,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%304,000$ Previous City contribution 374,563$ Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:2,600,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the construction of a median in the existing center turn lane. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 153 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.A-23;B-2 Name:WILLIAMS DR (3) Limits:900' E OF LA PALOMA DR to COUNTRY RD Impact Fee Class:Access Management Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):1,183 Service Area(s):A,B Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 104 Unclassified Street Excavation 1,446 cy 15.00$22,000$ 204 Asphalt (Type C)0 ton 110.00$-$ 304 Base 0 cy 40.00$-$ 404 Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 504 6' Concrete Sidewalk 0 sf 5.00$-$ 604 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 2,365 lf 16.00$38,000$ 704 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:385,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%19,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%8,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%135,000$ √Illumination 5%19,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%8,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%8,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%8,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%19,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%30,800$ √Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:254,800$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:639,800$ Construction Contingency:15%96,000$ Mobilization 8%51,000$ Prep ROW 5%32,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:900,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-900,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%144,000$ Previous City contribution 41,044$ Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:1,100,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the construction of a median in the existing center turn lane. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 154 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.A-24; B-3 Name:WILLIAMS DR (4) Limits:COUNTRY RD to S IH 35 SB Impact Fee Class:Access Management Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):12,698 Service Area(s):A,B Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 104 Unclassified Street Excavation 15,520 cy 15.00$233,000$ 204 Asphalt (Type C)0 ton 110.00$-$ 304 Base 0 cy 40.00$-$ 404 Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 504 6' Concrete Sidewalk 0 sf 5.00$-$ 604 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 25,396 lf 16.00$406,000$ 704 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:964,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%48,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%19,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%337,000$ √Illumination 5%48,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%19,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%19,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%19,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%48,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%77,120$ √Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:634,120$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:1,598,120$ Construction Contingency:15%240,000$ Mobilization 8%128,000$ Prep ROW 5%80,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:2,100,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-2,100,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%336,000$ Previous City contribution 440,552$ Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:2,900,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the construction of a median in the existing center turn lane. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 155 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.B-4 Name:D B WOOD RD (1) Limits:WILLIAMS DR to 1300' S OF WILLIAMS DR Impact Fee Class:Previously Constructed Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):1,274 Service Area(s):B Roadway Construction Cost Projection Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:2,145,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project has been previously constructed. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 156 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.B-5 Name:D B WOOD RD (2) Limits:1800' S OF WILLIAMS DR to 3200' S OF WILLIAMS DR Impact Fee Class:Access Management Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):1,393 Service Area(s):B,LAKE GEORGETOWN Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 104 Unclassified Street Excavation 1,703 cy 15.00$26,000$ 204 Asphalt (Type C)0 ton 110.00$-$ 304 Base 0 cy 40.00$-$ 404 Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 504 6' Concrete Sidewalk 0 sf 5.00$-$ 604 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 2,787 lf 16.00$45,000$ 704 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:396,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%20,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%8,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%139,000$ √Illumination 5%20,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%8,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%8,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%8,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%20,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%31,680$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:262,680$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:658,680$ Construction Contingency:15%99,000$ Mobilization 8%53,000$ Prep ROW 5%33,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:900,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-900,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%144,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:1,000,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. This project consists of the construction of a median in the existing center turn lane. Description: NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 157 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.B-6 Name:D B WOOD RD (3) Limits:3200' S OF WILLIAMS DR to CEDAR BREAKS RD Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):6,810 Service Area(s):B,LAKE GEORGETOWN Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Street Excavation 30,517 cy 15.00$458,000$ 205 6" Asphalt (Type C)12,984 ton 110.00$1,428,000$ 305 16" Base 22,194 cy 40.00$888,000$ 405 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 505 6' Concrete Sidewalk 81,716 sf 5.00$409,000$ 605 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 27,239 lf 16.00$436,000$ 705 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:3,944,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%197,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%79,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%1,380,000$ √Illumination 5%197,000$ √Special Drainage Structures Bridge Crossing 4,100,000$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%79,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%79,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%79,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%197,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%315,520$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:6,702,520$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:10,646,520$ Construction Contingency:15%1,597,000$ Mobilization 8%852,000$ Prep ROW 5%532,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:13,700,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-13,700,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%2,192,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:15,900,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. This project consists of the construction of a median in the existing center turn lane. Description: NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 158 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.B-7 Name:D B WOOD RD (4) Limits:CEDAR BREAKS RD to W UNIVERSITY AVE Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):9,969 Service Area(s):B Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Street Excavation 44,674 cy 15.00$670,000$ 205 6" Asphalt (Type C)19,007 ton 110.00$2,091,000$ 305 16" Base 32,490 cy 40.00$1,300,000$ 405 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 505 6' Concrete Sidewalk 119,622 sf 5.00$598,000$ 605 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 39,874 lf 16.00$638,000$ 705 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:5,622,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%281,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%112,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%1,968,000$ √Illumination 5%281,000$ √Special Drainage Structures Bridge Crossing 600,000$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%112,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%112,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%112,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%281,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%449,760$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:4,308,760$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:9,930,760$ Construction Contingency:15%1,490,000$ Mobilization 8%794,000$ Prep ROW 5%497,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:12,800,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-12,800,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%2,048,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:14,800,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 159 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.B-8 Name:COUNTRY RD Limits:WILLIAMS DR to 500' S OF RUSTLE CV Impact Fee Class:3 Lane Collector Ultimate Class:3U Length (lf):2,036 Service Area(s):B,ETJ/OTHER Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Street Excavation 2,576 cy 15.00$39,000$ 203 2" Asphalt (Type C)846 ton 110.00$93,000$ 303 8" Base 2,061 cy 40.00$82,000$ 403 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 503 6' Concrete Sidewalk 24,430 sf 5.00$122,000$ 603 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 8,143 lf 16.00$130,000$ 703 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 0 sy 101.59$-$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:466,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%23,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%9,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%163,000$ √Illumination 5%23,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%9,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%9,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%9,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%23,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%37,280$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:305,280$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:771,280$ Construction Contingency:15%116,000$ Mobilization 8%62,000$ Prep ROW 5%39,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:1,000,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-1,000,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%160,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:1,200,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 3 lane undivided collector. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 160 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.B-9 Name:BOOTYS CROSSING RD Limits:400' W OF PECAN LN to WILLIAMS DR Impact Fee Class:3 Lane Collector Ultimate Class:3U Length (lf):5,848 Service Area(s):B Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Street Excavation 7,400 cy 15.00$111,000$ 203 2" Asphalt (Type C)2,430 ton 110.00$267,000$ 303 8" Base 5,920 cy 40.00$237,000$ 403 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 503 6' Concrete Sidewalk 70,174 sf 5.00$351,000$ 603 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 23,391 lf 16.00$374,000$ 703 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 0 sy 101.59$-$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:1,340,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%67,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%27,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%469,000$ √Illumination 5%67,000$ √Special Drainage Structures Bridge Crossing 800,000$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%27,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%27,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%27,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%67,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%107,200$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:1,685,200$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:3,025,200$ Construction Contingency:15%454,000$ Mobilization 8%242,000$ Prep ROW 5%151,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:3,900,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-3,900,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%624,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:4,500,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 3 lane undivided collector. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 161 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.B-10 Name:WOLF RANCH PKWY Limits:RIVERY BLVD to MEMORIAL DRIVE Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Collector Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):7,336 Service Area(s):B Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 106 Unclassified Street Excavation 14,943 cy 15.00$224,000$ 206 2" Asphalt (Type C)4,662 ton 110.00$513,000$ 306 8" Base 11,954 cy 40.00$478,000$ 406 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 506 6' Concrete Sidewalk 88,028 sf 5.00$440,000$ 606 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 29,343 lf 16.00$469,000$ 706 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:2,449,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%122,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%49,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%857,000$ √Illumination 5%122,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%49,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%49,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%49,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%122,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%195,920$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:1,614,920$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:4,063,920$ Construction Contingency:15%610,000$ Mobilization 8%325,000$ Prep ROW 5%203,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:5,300,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-5,300,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%848,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:6,100,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided collector. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 162 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.B-11 Name:MEMORIAL DRIVE (1) Limits:RIVR CHASE BLVD to WOLF RANCH PKWY Impact Fee Class:3 Lane Collector Ultimate Class:3U Length (lf):2,068 Service Area(s):B Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Street Excavation 2,617 cy 15.00$39,000$ 203 2" Asphalt (Type C)860 ton 110.00$95,000$ 303 8" Base 2,094 cy 40.00$84,000$ 403 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 503 6' Concrete Sidewalk 24,820 sf 5.00$124,000$ 603 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 8,273 lf 16.00$132,000$ 703 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 0 sy 101.59$-$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:474,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%24,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%9,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%166,000$ √Illumination 5%24,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%9,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%9,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%9,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%24,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%37,920$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:311,920$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:785,920$ Construction Contingency:15%118,000$ Mobilization 8%63,000$ Prep ROW 5%39,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:1,100,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-1,100,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%176,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:1,300,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 3 lane undivided collector. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 163 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.B-12 Name:MEMORIAL DRIVE (2) Limits:WOLF RANCH PKWY to WOLF LAKES DR Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Collector Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):1,537 Service Area(s):B Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 106 Unclassified Street Excavation 3,130 cy 15.00$47,000$ 206 2" Asphalt (Type C)977 ton 110.00$107,000$ 306 8" Base 2,504 cy 40.00$100,000$ 406 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 506 6' Concrete Sidewalk 18,439 sf 5.00$92,000$ 606 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 6,146 lf 16.00$98,000$ 706 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:769,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%38,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%15,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%269,000$ √Illumination 5%38,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%15,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%15,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%15,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%38,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%61,520$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:504,520$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:1,273,520$ Construction Contingency:15%191,000$ Mobilization 8%102,000$ Prep ROW 5%64,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:1,700,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-1,700,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%272,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:2,000,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided collector. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 164 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.B-13; D-3 Name:W SH 29 (3) Limits:WOOD CT to WOLF RANCH PKWY Impact Fee Class:6 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:6D Length (lf):3,964 Service Area(s):B,D Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Street Excavation 24,226 cy 15.00$363,000$ 201 6" Asphalt (Type C)11,047 ton 110.00$1,215,000$ 301 16" Base 17,619 cy 40.00$705,000$ 401 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 501 6' Concrete Sidewalk 47,571 sf 5.00$238,000$ 601 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 15,857 lf 16.00$254,000$ 701 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:3,100,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%155,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%62,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%1,085,000$ √Illumination 5%155,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%62,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%62,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%62,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%155,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%248,000$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:2,046,000$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:5,146,000$ Construction Contingency:15%772,000$ Mobilization 8%412,000$ Prep ROW 5%257,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:6,600,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-6,600,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%1,056,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution)1,540,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 6 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 165 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.B-14; D-4 Name:W UNIVERSITY AVE Limits:WOLF RANCH PKWY to SCENIC DR Impact Fee Class:6 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:6D Length (lf):5,132 Service Area(s):B,D Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Street Excavation 31,361 cy 15.00$470,000$ 201 6" Asphalt (Type C)14,301 ton 110.00$1,573,000$ 301 16" Base 22,808 cy 40.00$912,000$ 401 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 501 6' Concrete Sidewalk 61,581 sf 5.00$308,000$ 601 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 20,527 lf 16.00$328,000$ 701 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:3,916,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%196,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%78,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%1,371,000$ √Illumination 5%196,000$ √Special Drainage Structures Bridge Crossing 1,300,000$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%78,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%78,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%78,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%196,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%313,280$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:3,884,280$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:7,800,280$ Construction Contingency:15%1,170,000$ Mobilization 8%624,000$ Prep ROW 5%390,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:10,000,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-10,000,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%1,600,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution)2,320,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 6 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 166 of 276 Roadway Improvements - Service Area C From To C-1 4 Lane Major Arterial NE INNER LOOP IH 35 NB UNIVERSITY AVE 100%34,700,000$34,700,000$ C-2 4 Lane Minor Arterial STADIUM DRIVE N AUSTIN AVE NE INNER LOOP 100%8,200,000$8,200,000$ C-3 4 Lane Minor Arterial STADIUM DRIVE NE INNER LOOP 1470' E OF NE INNER LOOP 50%2,700,000$1,350,000$ C-4 Access Management N AUSTIN AVE NE INNER LOOP WILLIAMS DRIVE 100%420,000$420,000$ C-5 4 Lane Major Arterial NORTHWEST BLVD N IH 35 FWY NB N AUSTIN AVE 100%2,700,000$2,700,000$ C-6 4 Lane Major Arterial FM 971 (1)N AUSTIN AVE E MORROW ST 100%2,666,846$2,666,846$ C-7 4 Lane Major Arterial FM 971 (2)E MORROW ST SH 130 SB 100%5,035,521$5,035,521$ C-8;F-1 4 Lane Major Arterial E SH 29 (1)HAVEN STREET 300' E OF REINHARDT BLVD 50%3,020,000$1,510,000$ C-9 4 Lane Major Arterial E SH 29 (2)300' E OF REINHARDT BLVD 300' E OF OWEN CIR 50%840,000$420,000$ C-10;F-2 Access Management E SH 29 (3)300' E OF OWEN CIR SH 130 50%180,000$90,000$ 60,462,367$57,092,367$ Intersection Improvements - Service Area C Improvement 1 Improvement 2 AI-9;CI-1 SIGNAL -50%500,000$250,000$ CI-2 SIGNAL -100%500,000$500,000$ CI-3 ROUNDABOUT -100%2,000,000$2,000,000$ AI-20;CI-4 OVERPASS -50%10,115,000$5,057,500$ CI-5 SIGNAL -100%500,000$500,000$ CI-6 TURN LANE SIGNAL 100%784,000$784,000$ CI-7 SIGNAL -100%500,000$500,000$ CI-8 TURN LANE -100%284,000$284,000$ CI-9 SIGNAL -100%500,000$500,000$ CI-10;FI-1 TURN LANE -50%400,000$200,000$ CI-11 OTHER -17%20,000,000$3,340,000$ 36,083,000$13,915,500$ City of Georgetown - 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Capital Improvement Plan for Transportation Impact Fees Summary of Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections #IF Class Project Limits Percent in Service Area Project Cost Total Cost in Service Area TOTAL #Project Improvement Percent in Service Area N AUSTIN AVE AND OLD AIRPORT RD FM 971 AND CR 152 INNER LOOP AND CR 151 (STADIUM DRIVE) Project Cost Total Cost in Service Area N IH 35 AND NORTHWEST BLVD N AUSTIN AVE AND FM 971 N IH 35 FRONTAGE AND SH 130 FRONTAGE CR 151 (STADIUM DRIVE) AND AUSTIN AVENUE S AUSTIN AVE AND 2ND ST MAPLE STREET AND SMITH CREEK RD E UNIVERSITY AVE AND HUTTO RD ITS SYSTEM UPGRADES TOTAL NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this Appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. These planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Georgetown, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections PRE-CREDIT DRAFT Page 167 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.C-1 Name:NE INNER LOOP Limits:IH 35 NB to UNIVERSITY AVE Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):16,475 Service Area(s):C Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Street Excavation 73,832 cy 15.00$1,107,000$ 205 6" Asphalt (Type C)31,412 ton 110.00$3,455,000$ 305 16" Base 53,696 cy 40.00$2,148,000$ 405 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)120,816 sy 11.00$1,329,000$ 505 6' Concrete Sidewalk 197,699 sf 5.00$988,000$ 605 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 65,900 lf 16.00$1,054,000$ 705 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:10,406,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%520,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%208,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%3,642,000$ √Illumination 5%520,000$ √Special Drainage Structures Bridge Crossing 5,800,000$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%208,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%208,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%208,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%520,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%832,480$ √Other Major Items Railroad Crossing $250,000 ea 250,000$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:12,916,480$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:23,322,480$ Construction Contingency:15%3,498,000$ Mobilization 8%1,866,000$ Prep ROW 5%1,166,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:29,900,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-29,900,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%4,784,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:34,700,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 168 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.C-2 Name:STADIUM DRIVE Limits:N AUSTIN AVE to NE INNER LOOP Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Minor Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):2,582 Service Area(s):C Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Street Excavation 8,417 cy 15.00$126,000$ 202 4" Asphalt (Type C)3,283 ton 110.00$361,000$ 302 12" Base 6,313 cy 40.00$253,000$ 402 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)18,938 sy 11.00$208,000$ 502 6' Concrete Sidewalk 30,990 sf 5.00$155,000$ 602 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 10,330 lf 16.00$165,000$ 702 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:1,593,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%80,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%32,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%558,000$ √Illumination 5%80,000$ √Special Drainage Structures Bridge Crossing 2,900,000$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%32,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%32,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%32,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%80,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%127,440$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:3,953,440$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:5,546,440$ Construction Contingency:15%832,000$ Mobilization 8%444,000$ Prep ROW 5%277,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:7,100,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-7,100,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%1,136,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:8,200,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 169 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.C-3 Name:STADIUM DRIVE Limits:NE INNER LOOP to 1470' E OF NE INNER LOOP Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Minor Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):1,464 Service Area(s):C,ETJ/OTHER Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Street Excavation 4,770 cy 15.00$72,000$ 202 4" Asphalt (Type C)1,860 ton 110.00$205,000$ 302 12" Base 3,577 cy 40.00$143,000$ 402 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)10,732 sy 11.00$118,000$ 502 6' Concrete Sidewalk 17,562 sf 5.00$88,000$ 602 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 5,854 lf 16.00$94,000$ 702 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:1,045,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%52,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%21,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%366,000$ √Illumination 5%52,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%21,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%21,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%21,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%52,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%83,600$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:689,600$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:1,734,600$ Construction Contingency:15%260,000$ Mobilization 8%139,000$ Prep ROW 5%87,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:2,300,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-2,300,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%368,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:2,700,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 170 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.C-4 Name:N AUSTIN AVE Limits:NE INNER LOOP to WILLIAMS DRIVE Impact Fee Class:Access Management Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):10,167 Service Area(s):C Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 104 Unclassified Street Excavation 12,426 cy 15.00$186,000$ 204 Asphalt (Type C)0 ton 110.00$-$ 304 Base 0 cy 40.00$-$ 404 Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 504 6' Concrete Sidewalk 0 sf 5.00$-$ 604 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 20,334 lf 16.00$325,000$ 704 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:836,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%42,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%17,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%293,000$ √Illumination 5%42,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%17,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%17,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%17,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%42,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%66,880$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:553,880$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:1,389,880$ Construction Contingency:15%208,000$ Mobilization 8%111,000$ Prep ROW 5%69,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:1,800,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-1,800,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%288,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution)420,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the construction of a median in the existing center turn lane. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 171 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.C-5 Name:NORTHWEST BLVD Limits:N IH 35 FWY NB to N AUSTIN AVE Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):1,172 Service Area(s):C Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Street Excavation 5,251 cy 15.00$79,000$ 205 6" Asphalt (Type C)2,234 ton 110.00$246,000$ 305 16" Base 3,819 cy 40.00$153,000$ 405 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)8,593 sy 11.00$95,000$ 505 6' Concrete Sidewalk 14,062 sf 5.00$70,000$ 605 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 4,687 lf 16.00$75,000$ 705 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:1,043,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%52,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%21,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%365,000$ √Illumination 5%52,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%21,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%21,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%21,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%52,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%83,440$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:688,440$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:1,731,440$ Construction Contingency:15%260,000$ Mobilization 8%139,000$ Prep ROW 5%87,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:2,300,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-2,300,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%368,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:2,700,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the construction of a new 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 172 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.C-6 Name:FM 971 (1) Limits:N AUSTIN AVE to E MORROW ST Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):3,344 Service Area(s):C Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Street Excavation 14,985 cy 15.00$225,000$ 205 6" Asphalt (Type C)6,375 ton 110.00$701,000$ 305 16" Base 10,898 cy 40.00$436,000$ 405 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)24,521 sy 11.00$270,000$ 505 6' Concrete Sidewalk 40,125 sf 5.00$201,000$ 605 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 13,375 lf 16.00$214,000$ 705 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:2,372,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%119,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%47,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%830,000$ √Illumination 5%119,000$ √Special Drainage Structures Minor Stream Crossing 200,000$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%47,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%47,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%47,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%119,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%189,760$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:1,764,760$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:4,136,760$ Construction Contingency:15%621,000$ Mobilization 8%331,000$ Prep ROW 5%207,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:5,300,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-5,300,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%848,000$ Previous City contribution 1,437,246$ Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution)2,666,846$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 173 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.C-7 Name:FM 971 (2) Limits:E MORROW ST to SH 130 SB Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):6,642 Service Area(s):C Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Street Excavation 29,765 cy 15.00$446,000$ 205 6" Asphalt (Type C)12,664 ton 110.00$1,393,000$ 305 16" Base 21,647 cy 40.00$866,000$ 405 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)48,706 sy 11.00$536,000$ 505 6' Concrete Sidewalk 79,701 sf 5.00$399,000$ 605 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 26,567 lf 16.00$425,000$ 705 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:4,390,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%220,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%88,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%1,537,000$ √Illumination 5%220,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%88,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%88,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%88,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%220,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%351,200$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:2,900,200$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:7,290,200$ Construction Contingency:15%1,094,000$ Mobilization 8%583,000$ Prep ROW 5%365,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:9,400,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-9,400,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%1,504,000$ Previous City contribution 2,854,721$ Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution)5,035,521$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 174 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.C-8;F-1 Name:E SH 29 (1) Limits:HAVEN STREET to 300' E OF REINHARDT BLVD Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):6,971 Service Area(s):C,F Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Street Excavation 31,239 cy 15.00$469,000$ 205 6" Asphalt (Type C)13,291 ton 110.00$1,462,000$ 305 16" Base 22,719 cy 40.00$909,000$ 405 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)51,119 sy 11.00$562,000$ 505 6' Concrete Sidewalk 83,649 sf 5.00$418,000$ 605 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 27,883 lf 16.00$446,000$ 705 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:4,591,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%230,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%92,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%1,607,000$ √Illumination 5%230,000$ √Special Drainage Structures Bridge Crossing 2,500,000$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%92,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%92,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%92,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%230,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%367,280$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:5,532,280$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:10,123,280$ Construction Contingency:15%1,518,000$ Mobilization 8%810,000$ Prep ROW 5%506,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:13,000,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-13,000,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%2,080,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution)3,020,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 175 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.C-9 Name:E SH 29 (2) Limits:300' E OF REINHARDT BLVD to 300' E OF OWEN CIR Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):2,216 Service Area(s):C Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Street Excavation 9,931 cy 15.00$149,000$ 205 6" Asphalt (Type C)4,225 ton 110.00$465,000$ 305 16" Base 7,222 cy 40.00$289,000$ 405 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)16,250 sy 11.00$179,000$ 505 6' Concrete Sidewalk 26,591 sf 5.00$133,000$ 605 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 8,864 lf 16.00$142,000$ 705 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:1,682,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%84,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%34,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%589,000$ √Illumination 5%84,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%34,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%34,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%34,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%84,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%134,560$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:1,111,560$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:2,793,560$ Construction Contingency:15%419,000$ Mobilization 8%223,000$ Prep ROW 5%140,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:3,600,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-3,600,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%576,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution)840,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. This project consists the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. Description: NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 176 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.C-10;F-2 Name:E SH 29 (3) Limits:300' E OF OWEN CIR to SH 130 Impact Fee Class:Access Management Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):432 Service Area(s):C,F Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 104 Unclassified Street Excavation 528 cy 15.00$8,000$ 204 Asphalt (Type C)0 ton 110.00$-$ 304 Base 0 cy 40.00$-$ 404 Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 504 6' Concrete Sidewalk 0 sf 5.00$-$ 604 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 864 lf 16.00$14,000$ 704 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:347,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%17,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%7,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%121,000$ √Illumination 5%17,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%7,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%7,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%7,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%17,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%27,760$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:227,760$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:574,760$ Construction Contingency:15%86,000$ Mobilization 8%46,000$ Prep ROW 5%29,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:800,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-800,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%128,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution)180,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the construction of a median in the existing center turn lane. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 177 of 276 Roadway Improvements - Service Area D From To D-1 6 Lane Major Arterial W SH 29 (1)2500' E OF GABRIEL FOREST 1000' E OF WOOD RANCH RD 50%2,840,000$1,420,000$ D-2 6 Lane Major Arterial W SH 29 (2)1000' E OF WOOD RANCH RD WOOD CT 100%620,000$620,000$ B-13; D-3 6 Lane Major Arterial W SH 29 (3)WOOD CT WOLF RANCH PKWY 50%1,540,000$770,000$ B-14; D-4 6 Lane Major Arterial W UNIVERSITY AVE WOLF RANCH PKWY SCENIC DR 50%2,320,000$1,160,000$ D-5 4 Lane Minor Arterial D B WOOD RD UNIVERSITY AVE WOLF RANCH PKWY 100%2,300,000$2,300,000$ D-6 4 Lane Minor Arterial WOLF RANCH PKWY UNIVERSITY BLVD SOUTHWEST BYP 100%11,072,399$11,072,399$ D-7 4 Lane Major Arterial SOUTHWEST BYPASS (1)WOLF RANCH PKWY 3400' S OF WOLF RANCH PKWY 100%4,987,068$4,987,068$ D-8 4 Lane Major Arterial SOUTHWEST BYPASS (2)3400' S OF WOLF RANCH PKWY 900' S OF ROCKY HILL DR 50%3,683,817$1,841,909$ D-9 4 Lane Major Arterial SOUTHWEST BYPASS (3)900' S OF ROCKY HILL DR LEANDER RD 100%1,979,565$1,979,565$ D-10 4 Lane Major Arterial RR 2243 (1)LIMESTONE CREEK RD RIVER RIDGE DR 100%9,262,556$9,262,556$ D-11 Access Management RR 2243 (2)RIVER RIDGE DR IH 35 100%904,244$904,244$ D-12 2 Lane Major Arterial NEW SOUTHWEST BYPASS W UNIVERSITY AVE WOLF RANCH PKWY 100%2,300,000$2,300,000$ 43,809,650$38,617,741$ Intersection Improvements - Service Area D Improvement 1 Improvement 2 BI-8;DI-1 SIGNAL -50%500,000$250,000$ BI-9;DI-2 TURN LANE TURN LANE 25%140,000$35,000$ DI-3 SIGNAL -100%500,000$500,000$ DI-4;EI-1 ROUNDABOUT -50%2,000,000$1,000,000$ DI-5;EI-5 SIGNAL -25%500,000$125,000$ DI-6 TURN LANE -100%70,000$70,000$ DI-7 SIGNAL -100%500,000$500,000$ DI-8 OTHER -17%20,000,000$3,340,000$ 24,210,000$5,820,000$TOTAL NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this Appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. These planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. SCENIC DRIVE AND W 17TH ST LEANDER RD AND SCENIC DR LEANDER ROAD AND ESCALERA PARKWAY W UNIVERSITY AVE AND SOUTHWEST BYPASS ITS SYSTEM UPGRADES D B WOOD RD AND WOLF RANCH PKWY TOTAL #Project Improvement Percent in Service Area DB WOOD ROAD AND SH 29 (UNIVERSITY) SCENIC DRIVE AND UNIVERSITY AVE Project Cost Total Cost in Service Area City of Georgetown - 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Capital Improvement Plan for Transportation Impact Fees Summary of Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections #IF Class Project Limits Percent in Service Area Project Cost Total Cost in Service Area 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Georgetown, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections PRE-CREDIT DRAFT Page 178 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.D-1 Name:W SH 29 (1) Limits:2500' E OF GABRIEL FOREST to 1000' E OF WOOD RANCH RD Impact Fee Class:6 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:6D Length (lf):7,739 Service Area(s):D,ETJ/OTHER Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Street Excavation 47,296 cy 15.00$709,000$ 201 6" Asphalt (Type C)21,567 ton 110.00$2,372,000$ 301 16" Base 34,397 cy 40.00$1,376,000$ 401 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 501 6' Concrete Sidewalk 92,872 sf 5.00$464,000$ 601 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 30,957 lf 16.00$495,000$ 701 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:5,741,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%287,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%115,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%2,009,000$ √Illumination 5%287,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%115,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%115,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%115,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%287,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%459,280$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:3,789,280$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:9,530,280$ Construction Contingency:15%1,430,000$ Mobilization 8%762,000$ Prep ROW 5%477,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:12,200,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-12,200,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%1,952,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution)2,840,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. This project consists the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 6 lane divided arterial. Description: NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 179 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.D-2 Name:W SH 29 (2) Limits:1000' E OF WOOD RANCH RD to WOOD CT Impact Fee Class:6 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:6D Length (lf):1,321 Service Area(s):D,<Null> Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Street Excavation 8,071 cy 15.00$121,000$ 201 6" Asphalt (Type C)3,680 ton 110.00$405,000$ 301 16" Base 5,870 cy 40.00$235,000$ 401 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 501 6' Concrete Sidewalk 15,849 sf 5.00$79,000$ 601 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 5,283 lf 16.00$85,000$ 701 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:1,250,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%63,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%25,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%438,000$ √Illumination 5%63,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%25,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%25,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%25,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%63,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%100,000$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:827,000$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:2,077,000$ Construction Contingency:15%312,000$ Mobilization 8%166,000$ Prep ROW 5%104,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:2,700,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-2,700,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%432,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution)620,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 6 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 180 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.D-5 Name:D B WOOD RD Limits:UNIVERSITY AVE to WOLF RANCH PKWY Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Minor Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):1,482 Service Area(s):D Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Street Excavation 4,829 cy 15.00$72,000$ 202 4" Asphalt (Type C)1,883 ton 110.00$207,000$ 302 12" Base 3,622 cy 40.00$145,000$ 402 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 502 6' Concrete Sidewalk 17,780 sf 5.00$89,000$ 602 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 5,927 lf 16.00$95,000$ 702 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:933,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%47,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%19,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%327,000$ √Illumination 5%47,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%19,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%19,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%19,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%47,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%74,640$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:618,640$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:1,551,640$ Construction Contingency:15%233,000$ Mobilization 8%124,000$ Prep ROW 5%78,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:2,000,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-2,000,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%320,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:2,300,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 181 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.D-6 Name:WOLF RANCH PKWY Limits:UNIVERSITY BLVD to SOUTHWEST BYP Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Minor Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):1,274 Service Area(s):D Roadway Construction Cost Projection Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:11,072,399$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project has been previously constructed. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 182 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.D-7 Name:SOUTHWEST BYPASS (1) Limits:WOLF RANCH PKWY to 3400' S OF WOLF RANCH PKWY Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):1,274 Service Area(s):D Roadway Construction Cost Projection Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:4,987,068$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project has been previously constructed. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 183 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.D-8 Name:SOUTHWEST BYPASS (2) Limits:3400' S OF WOLF RANCH PKWY to 900' S OF ROCKY HILL DR Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):1,274 Service Area(s):D,ETJ/OTHER Roadway Construction Cost Projection Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:3,683,817$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project has been previously constructed. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 184 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.D-9 Name:SOUTHWEST BYPASS (3) Limits:900' S OF ROCKY HILL DR to LEANDER RD Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):1,274 Service Area(s):D Roadway Construction Cost Projection Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:1,979,565$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project has been previously constructed. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 185 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.D-10 Name:RR 2243 (1) Limits:LIMESTONE CREEK RD to RIVER RIDGE DR Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):30,852 Service Area(s):D,ETJ/OTHER Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Street Excavation 138,264 cy 15.00$2,074,000$ 205 6" Asphalt (Type C)58,825 ton 110.00$6,471,000$ 305 16" Base 100,556 cy 40.00$4,022,000$ 405 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 505 6' Concrete Sidewalk 370,228 sf 5.00$1,851,000$ 605 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 123,409 lf 16.00$1,975,000$ 705 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:16,718,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%836,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%334,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%5,851,000$ √Illumination 5%836,000$ √Special Drainage Structures Bridge Crossing 300,000$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%334,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%334,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%334,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%836,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%1,337,440$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:11,332,440$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:28,050,440$ Construction Contingency:15%4,208,000$ Mobilization 8%2,244,000$ Prep ROW 5%1,403,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:36,000,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-36,000,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%5,760,000$ Previous City contribution 910,556$ Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution)9,262,556$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 186 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.D-11 Name:RR 2243 (2) Limits:RIVER RIDGE DR to IH 35 Impact Fee Class:Access Management Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):5,740 Service Area(s):D,ETJ/OTHER Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 104 Unclassified Street Excavation 7,016 cy 15.00$105,000$ 204 Asphalt (Type C)0 ton 110.00$-$ 304 Base 0 cy 40.00$-$ 404 Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 504 6' Concrete Sidewalk 0 sf 5.00$-$ 604 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 11,480 lf 16.00$184,000$ 704 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:614,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%31,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%12,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%215,000$ √Illumination 5%31,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%12,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%12,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%12,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%31,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%49,120$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:405,120$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:1,019,120$ Construction Contingency:15%153,000$ Mobilization 8%82,000$ Prep ROW 5%51,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:1,400,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-1,400,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%224,000$ Previous City contribution 579,444$ Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution)904,244$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the construction of a median in the existing center turn lane. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 187 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.D-12 Name:NEW SOUTHWEST BYPASS Limits:W UNIVERSITY AVE to WOLF RANCH PKWY Impact Fee Class:2 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):2,864 Service Area(s):D Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 107 Unclassified Street Excavation 6,417 cy 15.00$96,000$ 207 6" Asphalt (Type C)2,730 ton 110.00$300,000$ 307 16" Base 4,667 cy 40.00$187,000$ 407 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 507 6' Concrete Sidewalk 34,368 sf 5.00$172,000$ 607 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 11,456 lf 16.00$183,000$ 707 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 0 sy 101.59$-$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:938,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%47,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%19,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%328,000$ √Illumination 5%47,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%19,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%19,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%19,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%47,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%75,040$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:620,040$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:1,558,040$ Construction Contingency:15%234,000$ Mobilization 8%125,000$ Prep ROW 5%78,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:2,000,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-2,000,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%320,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:2,300,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the construction of a new 2 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 188 of 276 Roadway Improvements - Service Area E From To E-1 Access Management LEANDER RD SCENIC DRIVE FM 1460 100%380,000$380,000$ E-2 4 Lane Major Arterial S AUSTIN AVE 18TH STREET SE INNER LOOP 100%2,800,000$2,800,000$ E-3 Previously Constructed FM 1460 (1)FM 1460 2900' S OF OLD FM 1460 100%840,213$840,213$ E-4 Previously Constructed FM 1460 (2)2900' S OF FM 1460 4400' S OF OLD FM 1460 100%937,088$937,088$ E-5 Previously Constructed FM 1460 (3)200' S OF SE INNER LOOP 4400' S OF OLD FM 1460 100%1,396,767$1,396,767$ E-6 Previously Constructed FM 1460 (4)200' S OF SE INNER LOOP 1000' S OF SE INNER LOOP 100%483,740$483,740$ E-7 Previously Constructed FM 1460 (5)1000' S OF SE INNER LOOP 1600' S OF SE INNER LOOP 50%381,167$190,583$ E-8 Previously Constructed FM 1460 (6)1600' S OF SE INNER LOOP 500' N OF NATURITA DR 100%1,714,617$1,714,617$ E-9 Previously Constructed FM 1460 (7)500' N OF NATURITA DR 600' S OF NATURITA DR 100%664,826$664,826$ E-10 Previously Constructed FM 1460 (8)600' S OF NATURITA DR 400' S OF MIDNIGHT LN 50%613,539$306,770$ E-11 Previously Constructed FM 1460 (9)400' S OF MIDNIGHT LN 1000' S OF MIDNIGHT LN 50%307,719$153,860$ E-12 Previously Constructed FM 1460 (10)1000' S OF MIDNIGHT LN WESTINGHOUSE RD 50%1,026,997$513,499$ E-13 Previously Constructed FM 1460 (11)WESTINGHOUSE RD 1800' S OF WESTINGHOUSE RD 100%1,040,294$1,040,294$ E-14 4 Lane Major Arterial SE INNER LOOP (1)S AUSTIN AVE 600' W OF S AUSTIN AVE 100%1,700,000$1,700,000$ E-15 4 Lane Major Arterial SE INNER LOOP (2)600' E OF S AUSTIN AVE 1800' E OF S AUSTIN AVE 50%10,900,000$5,450,000$ E-16 4 Lane Major Arterial SE INNER LOOP (3)900' W OF FM 1460 SAM HOUSTON AVE 100%6,300,000$6,300,000$ E-17 4 Lane Collector RABBIT HILL RD (2)700' N OF COMMERCE BLVD 300' N OF COMMERCE BLVD 50%1,200,000$600,000$ E-18 4 Lane Collector RABBIT HILL RD (1)300' N OF COMMERCE BLVD WESTINGHOUSE RD 100%2,400,000$2,400,000$ E-19 6 Lane Major Arterial WESTINGHOUSE RD (1)S IH 35 2000' E OF MAYS ST 100%13,200,000$13,200,000$ E-20 6 Lane Major Arterial WESTINGHOUSE RD (2)2000' E OF MAYS ST 2500' E OF MAYS ST 50%1,900,000$950,000$ E-21 6 Lane Major Arterial WESTINGHOUSE RD (3)2500' E OF MAYS ST 3000' E OF MAYS ST 100%2,100,000$2,100,000$ E-22 6 Lane Major Arterial WESTINGHOUSE RD (4)3600' E OF MAYS ST 5800' E OF MAYS ST 50%5,100,000$2,550,000$ E-23 6 Lane Major Arterial WESTINGHOUSE RD (5)5800' E OF MAYS ST 700' E OF SCENIC LAKE DR 100%3,900,000$3,900,000$ E-24 6 Lane Major Arterial WESTINGHOUSE RD (6)700' E OF SCENIC LAKE DR FM 1460 50%2,200,000$1,100,000$ E-25 4 Lane Major Arterial WESTINGHOUSE RD (7)FM 1460 MAPLE STREET 100%6,600,000$6,600,000$ E-26;F-3 4 Lane Collector MAPLE ST (1)E 22ND STREET BRITTANIA BLVD 50%3,800,000$1,900,000$ E-27;F-4 4 Lane Collector MAPLE ST (2)BRITTANIA BLVD SE INNER LOOP 50%18,200,000$9,100,000$ E-28;F-5 4 Lane Collector MAPLE ST (3)SE INNER LOOP PINNACLE DR 50%4,600,000$2,300,000$ E-29;F-6 4 Lane Collector MAPLE ST (4)PINNACLE DR WESTINGHOUSE RD 50%5,200,000$2,600,000$ 101,886,967$74,172,255$TOTAL City of Georgetown - 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Capital Improvement Plan for Transportation Impact Fees Summary of Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections #IF Class Project Limits Percent in Service Area Project Cost Total Cost in Service Area 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Georgetown, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections PRE-CREDIT DRAFT Page 189 of 276 City of Georgetown - 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Capital Improvement Plan for Transportation Impact Fees Summary of Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Intersection Improvements - Service Area E Improvement 1 Improvement 2 DI-4;EI-1 ROUNDABOUT -50%2,000,000$1,000,000$ EI-2 SIGNAL -75%500,000$375,000$ EI-3 SIGNAL TURN LANE 75%640,000$480,000$ EI-4 TURN LANE -75%70,000$52,500$ DI-5;EI-5 SIGNAL TURN LANE 50%640,000$320,000$ EI-6 TURN LANE -75%400,000$300,000$ EI-7 SIGNAL TURN LANE 75%640,000$480,000$ EI-8 SIGNAL -75%500,000$375,000$ EI-9 ROUNDABOUT -75%2,000,000$1,500,000$ EI-10 SIGNAL -50%500,000$250,000$ EI-11 SIGNAL -50%500,000$250,000$ EI-12;FI-2 INNOVATIVE -50%10,000,000$5,000,000$ EI-13;FI-3 INNOVATIVE -50%10,000,000$5,000,000$ EI-14 SIGNAL -50%500,000$250,000$ EI-15 SIGNAL -100%500,000$500,000$ EI-16 TURN LANE -75%400,000$300,000$ EI-17 OTHER -17%20,000,000$3,340,000$ 49,790,000$19,772,500$ AUSTIN AVE AND LEANDER RD AUSTIN AVE AND 21ST STREET S MAIN ST AND W 21ST ST E 21ST STREET AND INDUSTRIAL AVE INDUSTRIAL AVE AND FM 1460 SNEAD DRIVE (BLUE SPRINGS RD) AND SE INNER LOOP SAM HOUSTON AVE AND MAPLE STREET SE INNER LOOP AND MAPLE STREET LA CONTERRA BLVD AND FM 1460 E 17TH ST AND S CHURCH ST LEANDER RD AND SCENIC DR WESTINGHOUSE RD AND FM 1460 TOTAL NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this Appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. These planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. WESTINGHOUSE RD AND SCENIC LAKE DR ITS SYSTEM UPGRADES W 17TH STREET AND S AUSTIN AVE #Project Improvement Percent in Service Area SCENIC DRIVE AND W 17TH ST RAILROAD AVE AND 17TH STREET Project Cost Total Cost in Service Area 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Georgetown, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections PRE-CREDIT DRAFT Page 190 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.E-1 Name:LEANDER RD Limits:SCENIC DRIVE to FM 1460 Impact Fee Class:Access Management Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):5,045 Service Area(s):E Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 104 Unclassified Street Excavation 6,166 cy 15.00$92,000$ 204 Asphalt (Type C)0 ton 110.00$-$ 304 Base 0 cy 40.00$-$ 404 Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 504 6' Concrete Sidewalk 0 sf 5.00$-$ 604 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 10,090 lf 16.00$161,000$ 704 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:578,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%29,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%12,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%202,000$ √Illumination 5%29,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%12,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%12,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%12,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%29,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%46,240$ √Other Major Items Railroad Crossing $250,000 ea 250,000$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:633,240$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:1,211,240$ Construction Contingency:15%182,000$ Mobilization 8%97,000$ Prep ROW 5%61,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:1,600,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-1,600,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%256,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution)380,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the construction of a median in the existing center turn lane. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 191 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.E-2 Name:S AUSTIN AVE Limits:18TH STREET to SE INNER LOOP Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):7,298 Service Area(s):E Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Street Excavation 32,704 cy 15.00$491,000$ 205 6" Asphalt (Type C)13,914 ton 110.00$1,531,000$ 305 16" Base 23,785 cy 40.00$951,000$ 405 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)53,516 sy 11.00$589,000$ 505 6' Concrete Sidewalk 87,572 sf 5.00$438,000$ 605 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 29,191 lf 16.00$467,000$ 705 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:4,792,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%240,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%96,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%1,677,000$ √Illumination 5%240,000$ √Special Drainage Structures Bridge Crossing 1,200,000$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%96,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%96,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%96,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%240,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%383,360$ √Other Major Items Railroad Crossing $250,000 ea 250,000$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:4,614,360$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:9,406,360$ Construction Contingency:15%1,411,000$ Mobilization 8%753,000$ Prep ROW 5%470,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:12,100,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-12,100,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%1,936,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution)2,800,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 192 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.E-3 Name:FM 1460 (1) Limits:FM 1460 to 2900' S OF OLD FM 1460 Impact Fee Class:Previously Constructed Ultimate Class:6D Length (lf):1,274 Service Area(s):E Roadway Construction Cost Projection Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:840,213$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project has been previously constructed. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 193 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.E-4 Name:FM 1460 (2) Limits:2900' S OF FM 1460 to 4400' S OF OLD FM 1460 Impact Fee Class:Previously Constructed Ultimate Class:6D Length (lf):1,274 Service Area(s):E Roadway Construction Cost Projection Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:937,088$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project has been previously constructed. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 194 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.E-5 Name:FM 1460 (3) Limits:200' S OF SE INNER LOOP to 4400' S OF OLD FM 1460 Impact Fee Class:Previously Constructed Ultimate Class:6D Length (lf):1,274 Service Area(s):E Roadway Construction Cost Projection Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:1,396,767$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project has been previously constructed. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 195 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.E-6 Name:FM 1460 (4) Limits:200' S OF SE INNER LOOP to 1000' S OF SE INNER LOOP Impact Fee Class:Previously Constructed Ultimate Class:6D Length (lf):1,274 Service Area(s):E Roadway Construction Cost Projection Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:483,740$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project has been previously constructed. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 196 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.E-7 Name:FM 1460 (5) Limits:1000' S OF SE INNER LOOP to 1600' S OF SE INNER LOOP Impact Fee Class:Previously Constructed Ultimate Class:6D Length (lf):1,274 Service Area(s):E,ETJ/OTHER Roadway Construction Cost Projection Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:381,167$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project has been previously constructed. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 197 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.E-8 Name:FM 1460 (6) Limits:1600' S OF SE INNER LOOP to 500' N OF NATURITA DR Impact Fee Class:Previously Constructed Ultimate Class:6D Length (lf):1,274 Service Area(s):E Roadway Construction Cost Projection Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:1,714,617$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project has been previously constructed. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 198 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.E-9 Name:FM 1460 (7) Limits:500' N OF NATURITA DR to 600' S OF NATURITA DR Impact Fee Class:Previously Constructed Ultimate Class:6D Length (lf):1,274 Service Area(s):E Roadway Construction Cost Projection Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:664,826$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project has been previously constructed. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 199 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.E-10 Name:FM 1460 (8) Limits:600' S OF NATURITA DR to 400' S OF MIDNIGHT LN Impact Fee Class:Previously Constructed Ultimate Class:6D Length (lf):1,274 Service Area(s):E,ETJ/OTHER Roadway Construction Cost Projection Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:613,539$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project has been previously constructed. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 200 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.E-11 Name:FM 1460 (9) Limits:400' S OF MIDNIGHT LN to 1000' S OF MIDNIGHT LN Impact Fee Class:Previously Constructed Ultimate Class:6D Length (lf):1,274 Service Area(s):E,ETJ/OTHER Roadway Construction Cost Projection Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:307,719$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project has been previously constructed. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 201 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.E-12 Name:FM 1460 (10) Limits:1000' S OF MIDNIGHT LN to WESTINGHOUSE RD Impact Fee Class:Previously Constructed Ultimate Class:6D Length (lf):1,274 Service Area(s):E,ETJ/OTHER Roadway Construction Cost Projection Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:1,026,997$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project has been previously constructed. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 202 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.E-13 Name:FM 1460 (11) Limits:WESTINGHOUSE RD to 1800' S OF WESTINGHOUSE RD Impact Fee Class:Previously Constructed Ultimate Class:6D Length (lf):1,274 Service Area(s):E Roadway Construction Cost Projection Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:1,040,294$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project has been previously constructed. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 203 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.E-14 Name:SE INNER LOOP (1) Limits:S AUSTIN AVE to 600' W OF S AUSTIN AVE Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):589 Service Area(s):E Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Street Excavation 2,640 cy 15.00$40,000$ 205 6" Asphalt (Type C)1,123 ton 110.00$124,000$ 305 16" Base 1,920 cy 40.00$77,000$ 405 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)4,319 sy 11.00$48,000$ 505 6' Concrete Sidewalk 7,068 sf 5.00$35,000$ 605 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 2,356 lf 16.00$38,000$ 705 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:687,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%34,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%14,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%240,000$ √Illumination 5%34,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%14,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%14,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%14,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%34,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%54,960$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:452,960$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:1,139,960$ Construction Contingency:15%171,000$ Mobilization 8%91,000$ Prep ROW 5%57,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:1,500,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-1,500,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%240,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:1,700,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. This project consists of the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. Description: NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 204 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.E-15 Name:SE INNER LOOP (2) Limits:600' E OF S AUSTIN AVE to 1800' E OF S AUSTIN AVE Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):4,586 Service Area(s):E,ETJ/OTHER Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Street Excavation 20,552 cy 15.00$308,000$ 205 6" Asphalt (Type C)8,744 ton 110.00$962,000$ 305 16" Base 14,947 cy 40.00$598,000$ 405 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)33,630 sy 11.00$370,000$ 505 6' Concrete Sidewalk 55,031 sf 5.00$275,000$ 605 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 18,344 lf 16.00$293,000$ 705 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:3,131,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%157,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%63,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%1,096,000$ √Illumination 5%157,000$ √Special Drainage Structures Bridge Crossing 2,100,000$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%63,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%63,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%63,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%157,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%250,480$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:4,169,480$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:7,300,480$ Construction Contingency:15%1,095,000$ Mobilization 8%584,000$ Prep ROW 5%365,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:9,400,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-9,400,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%1,504,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:10,900,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 205 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.E-16 Name:SE INNER LOOP (3) Limits:900' W OF FM 1460 to SAM HOUSTON AVE Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):3,001 Service Area(s):E Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Street Excavation 13,450 cy 15.00$202,000$ 205 6" Asphalt (Type C)5,722 ton 110.00$629,000$ 305 16" Base 9,781 cy 40.00$391,000$ 405 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)22,008 sy 11.00$242,000$ 505 6' Concrete Sidewalk 36,014 sf 5.00$180,000$ 605 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 12,005 lf 16.00$192,000$ 705 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:2,161,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%108,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%43,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%756,000$ √Illumination 5%108,000$ √Special Drainage Structures Bridge Crossing 600,000$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%43,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%43,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%43,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%108,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%172,880$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:2,024,880$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:4,185,880$ Construction Contingency:15%628,000$ Mobilization 8%335,000$ Prep ROW 5%209,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:5,400,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-5,400,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%864,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:6,300,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 206 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.E-17 Name:RABBIT HILL RD (2) Limits:700' N OF COMMERCE BLVD to 300' N OF COMMERCE BLVD Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Collector Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):338 Service Area(s):E,ETJ/OTHER Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 106 Unclassified Street Excavation 688 cy 15.00$10,000$ 206 2" Asphalt (Type C)215 ton 110.00$24,000$ 306 8" Base 550 cy 40.00$22,000$ 406 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)2,476 sy 11.00$27,000$ 506 6' Concrete Sidewalk 4,052 sf 5.00$20,000$ 606 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 1,351 lf 16.00$22,000$ 706 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:450,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%23,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%9,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%158,000$ √Illumination 5%23,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%9,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%9,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%9,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%23,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%36,000$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:299,000$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:749,000$ Construction Contingency:15%112,000$ Mobilization 8%60,000$ Prep ROW 5%37,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:1,000,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-1,000,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%160,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:1,200,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 207 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.E-18 Name:RABBIT HILL RD (1) Limits:300' N OF COMMERCE BLVD to WESTINGHOUSE RD Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Collector Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):1,733 Service Area(s):E Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 106 Unclassified Street Excavation 3,531 cy 15.00$53,000$ 206 2" Asphalt (Type C)1,102 ton 110.00$121,000$ 306 8" Base 2,824 cy 40.00$113,000$ 406 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)12,710 sy 11.00$140,000$ 506 6' Concrete Sidewalk 20,798 sf 5.00$104,000$ 606 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 6,933 lf 16.00$111,000$ 706 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:967,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%48,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%19,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%338,000$ √Illumination 5%48,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%19,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%19,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%19,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%48,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%77,360$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:635,360$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:1,602,360$ Construction Contingency:15%240,000$ Mobilization 8%128,000$ Prep ROW 5%80,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:2,100,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-2,100,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%336,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:2,400,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 208 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.E-19 Name:WESTINGHOUSE RD (1) Limits:S IH 35 to 2000' E OF MAYS ST Impact Fee Class:6 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:6D Length (lf):5,798 Service Area(s):E Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Street Excavation 35,431 cy 15.00$531,000$ 201 6" Asphalt (Type C)16,156 ton 110.00$1,777,000$ 301 16" Base 25,768 cy 40.00$1,031,000$ 401 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)57,978 sy 11.00$638,000$ 501 6' Concrete Sidewalk 69,573 sf 5.00$348,000$ 601 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 23,191 lf 16.00$371,000$ 701 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:5,021,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%251,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%100,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%1,757,000$ √Illumination 5%251,000$ √Special Drainage Structures Bridge Crossing 500,000$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%100,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%100,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%100,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%251,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%401,680$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:3,811,680$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:8,832,680$ Construction Contingency:15%1,325,000$ Mobilization 8%707,000$ Prep ROW 5%442,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:11,400,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-11,400,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%1,824,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:13,200,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 6 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 209 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.E-20 Name:WESTINGHOUSE RD (2) Limits:2000' E OF MAYS ST to 2500' E OF MAYS ST Impact Fee Class:6 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:6D Length (lf):490 Service Area(s):E,ETJ/OTHER Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Street Excavation 2,992 cy 15.00$45,000$ 201 6" Asphalt (Type C)1,365 ton 110.00$150,000$ 301 16" Base 2,176 cy 40.00$87,000$ 401 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)4,897 sy 11.00$54,000$ 501 6' Concrete Sidewalk 5,876 sf 5.00$29,000$ 601 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 1,959 lf 16.00$31,000$ 701 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:721,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%36,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%14,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%252,000$ √Illumination 5%36,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%14,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%14,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%14,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%36,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%57,680$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:473,680$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:1,194,680$ Construction Contingency:15%179,000$ Mobilization 8%96,000$ Prep ROW 5%60,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:1,600,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-1,600,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%256,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:1,900,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 6 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 210 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.E-21 Name:WESTINGHOUSE RD (3) Limits:2500' E OF MAYS ST to 3000' E OF MAYS ST Impact Fee Class:6 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:6D Length (lf):595 Service Area(s):E Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Street Excavation 3,637 cy 15.00$55,000$ 201 6" Asphalt (Type C)1,658 ton 110.00$182,000$ 301 16" Base 2,645 cy 40.00$106,000$ 401 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)5,951 sy 11.00$65,000$ 501 6' Concrete Sidewalk 7,141 sf 5.00$36,000$ 601 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 2,380 lf 16.00$38,000$ 701 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:807,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%40,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%16,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%282,000$ √Illumination 5%40,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%16,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%16,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%16,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%40,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%64,560$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:530,560$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:1,337,560$ Construction Contingency:15%201,000$ Mobilization 8%107,000$ Prep ROW 5%67,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:1,800,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-1,800,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%288,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:2,100,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 6 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 211 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.E-22 Name:WESTINGHOUSE RD (4) Limits:3600' E OF MAYS ST to 5800' E OF MAYS ST Impact Fee Class:6 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:6D Length (lf):2,136 Service Area(s):E,ETJ/OTHER Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Street Excavation 13,051 cy 15.00$196,000$ 201 6" Asphalt (Type C)5,951 ton 110.00$655,000$ 301 16" Base 9,492 cy 40.00$380,000$ 401 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)21,356 sy 11.00$235,000$ 501 6' Concrete Sidewalk 25,628 sf 5.00$128,000$ 601 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 8,543 lf 16.00$137,000$ 701 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:2,056,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%103,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%41,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%720,000$ √Illumination 5%103,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%41,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%41,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%41,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%103,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%164,480$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:1,357,480$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:3,413,480$ Construction Contingency:15%512,000$ Mobilization 8%273,000$ Prep ROW 5%171,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:4,400,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-4,400,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%704,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:5,100,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 6 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 212 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.E-23 Name:WESTINGHOUSE RD (5) Limits:5800' E OF MAYS ST to 700' E OF SCENIC LAKE DR Impact Fee Class:6 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:6D Length (lf):1,519 Service Area(s):E,ETJ/OTHER Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Street Excavation 9,283 cy 15.00$139,000$ 201 6" Asphalt (Type C)4,233 ton 110.00$466,000$ 301 16" Base 6,751 cy 40.00$270,000$ 401 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)15,190 sy 11.00$167,000$ 501 6' Concrete Sidewalk 18,228 sf 5.00$91,000$ 601 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 6,076 lf 16.00$97,000$ 701 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:1,555,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%78,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%31,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%544,000$ √Illumination 5%78,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%31,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%31,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%31,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%78,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%124,400$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:1,026,400$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:2,581,400$ Construction Contingency:15%387,000$ Mobilization 8%207,000$ Prep ROW 5%129,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:3,400,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-3,400,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%544,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:3,900,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 6 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 213 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.E-24 Name:WESTINGHOUSE RD (6) Limits:700' E OF SCENIC LAKE DR to FM 1460 Impact Fee Class:6 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:6D Length (lf):659 Service Area(s):E,ETJ/OTHER Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Street Excavation 4,028 cy 15.00$60,000$ 201 6" Asphalt (Type C)1,837 ton 110.00$202,000$ 301 16" Base 2,930 cy 40.00$117,000$ 401 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)6,592 sy 11.00$73,000$ 501 6' Concrete Sidewalk 7,910 sf 5.00$40,000$ 601 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 2,637 lf 16.00$42,000$ 701 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:859,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%43,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%17,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%301,000$ √Illumination 5%43,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%17,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%17,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%17,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%43,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%68,720$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:566,720$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:1,425,720$ Construction Contingency:15%214,000$ Mobilization 8%114,000$ Prep ROW 5%71,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:1,900,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-1,900,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%304,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:2,200,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 6 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 214 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.E-25 Name:WESTINGHOUSE RD (7) Limits:FM 1460 to MAPLE STREET Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):3,810 Service Area(s):E Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Street Excavation 17,076 cy 15.00$256,000$ 205 6" Asphalt (Type C)7,265 ton 110.00$799,000$ 305 16" Base 12,419 cy 40.00$497,000$ 405 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)27,943 sy 11.00$307,000$ 505 6' Concrete Sidewalk 45,725 sf 5.00$229,000$ 605 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 15,242 lf 16.00$244,000$ 705 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:2,657,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%133,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%53,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%930,000$ √Illumination 5%133,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%53,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%53,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%53,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%133,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%212,560$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:1,753,560$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:4,410,560$ Construction Contingency:15%662,000$ Mobilization 8%353,000$ Prep ROW 5%221,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:5,700,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-5,700,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%912,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:6,600,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 215 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.E-26;F-3 Name:MAPLE ST (1) Limits:E 22ND STREET to BRITTANIA BLVD Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Collector Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):529 Service Area(s):E,F Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 106 Unclassified Street Excavation 1,078 cy 15.00$16,000$ 206 2" Asphalt (Type C)336 ton 110.00$37,000$ 306 8" Base 862 cy 40.00$34,000$ 406 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)3,881 sy 11.00$43,000$ 506 6' Concrete Sidewalk 6,350 sf 5.00$32,000$ 606 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 2,117 lf 16.00$34,000$ 706 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:521,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%26,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%10,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%182,000$ √Illumination 5%26,000$ √Special Drainage Structures Bridge Crossing 1,700,000$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%10,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%10,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%10,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%26,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%41,680$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:2,041,680$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:2,562,680$ Construction Contingency:15%384,000$ Mobilization 8%205,000$ Prep ROW 5%128,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:3,300,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-3,300,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%528,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:3,800,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 216 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.E-27;F-4 Name:MAPLE ST (2) Limits:BRITTANIA BLVD to SE INNER LOOP Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Collector Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):4,805 Service Area(s):E,F Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 106 Unclassified Street Excavation 9,787 cy 15.00$147,000$ 206 2" Asphalt (Type C)3,054 ton 110.00$336,000$ 306 8" Base 7,830 cy 40.00$313,000$ 406 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)35,234 sy 11.00$388,000$ 506 6' Concrete Sidewalk 57,655 sf 5.00$288,000$ 606 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 19,218 lf 16.00$307,000$ 706 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:2,104,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%105,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%42,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%736,000$ √Illumination 5%105,000$ √Special Drainage Structures Bridge Crossing 8,700,000$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%42,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%42,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%42,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%105,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%168,320$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:10,087,320$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:12,191,320$ Construction Contingency:15%1,829,000$ Mobilization 8%975,000$ Prep ROW 5%610,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:15,700,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-15,700,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%2,512,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:18,200,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 217 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.E-28;F-5 Name:MAPLE ST (3) Limits:SE INNER LOOP to PINNACLE DR Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Collector Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):4,139 Service Area(s):E,F Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 106 Unclassified Street Excavation 8,430 cy 15.00$126,000$ 206 2" Asphalt (Type C)2,630 ton 110.00$289,000$ 306 8" Base 6,744 cy 40.00$270,000$ 406 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)30,349 sy 11.00$334,000$ 506 6' Concrete Sidewalk 49,663 sf 5.00$248,000$ 606 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 16,554 lf 16.00$265,000$ 706 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:1,857,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%93,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%37,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%650,000$ √Illumination 5%93,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%37,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%37,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%37,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%93,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%148,560$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:1,225,560$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:3,082,560$ Construction Contingency:15%462,000$ Mobilization 8%247,000$ Prep ROW 5%154,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:4,000,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-4,000,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%640,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:4,600,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 218 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.E-29;F-6 Name:MAPLE ST (4) Limits:PINNACLE DR to WESTINGHOUSE RD Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Collector Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):4,414 Service Area(s):E,F Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 106 Unclassified Street Excavation 8,991 cy 15.00$135,000$ 206 2" Asphalt (Type C)2,805 ton 110.00$309,000$ 306 8" Base 7,192 cy 40.00$288,000$ 406 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)32,366 sy 11.00$356,000$ 506 6' Concrete Sidewalk 52,963 sf 5.00$265,000$ 606 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 17,654 lf 16.00$282,000$ 706 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:1,960,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%98,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%39,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%686,000$ √Illumination 5%98,000$ √Special Drainage Structures Minor Stream Crossing 200,000$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%39,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%39,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%39,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%98,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%156,800$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:1,492,800$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:3,452,800$ Construction Contingency:15%518,000$ Mobilization 8%276,000$ Prep ROW 5%173,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:4,500,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-4,500,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%720,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:5,200,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 219 of 276 Roadway Improvements - Service Area F From To C-8;F-1 4 Lane Major Arterial E SH 29 (1)HAVEN STREET 300' E OF REINHARDT BLVD 50%3,020,000$1,510,000$ C-10;F-2 Access Management E SH 29 (2)300' E OF OWEN CIR SH 130 50%180,000$90,000$ E-26;F-3 4 Lane Collector MAPLE ST (1)E 22ND STREET BRITTANIA BLVD 50%3,800,000$1,900,000$ E-27;F-4 4 Lane Collector MAPLE ST (2)BRITTANIA BLVD SE INNER LOOP 50%18,200,000$9,100,000$ E-28;F-5 4 Lane Collector MAPLE ST (3)SE INNER LOOP PINNACLE DR 50%4,600,000$2,300,000$ E-29;F-6 4 Lane Collector MAPLE ST (4)PINNACLE DR WESTINGHOUSE RD 50%5,200,000$2,600,000$ F-7 4 Lane Minor Arterial SE INNER LOOP (1)UNIVERSITY AVE ROCKRIDE LN 100%8,800,000$8,800,000$ F-8 4 Lane Minor Arterial SE INNER LOOP (2)ROCKRIDE LN SOUTHWESTERN BLVD 50%3,000,000$1,500,000$ F-9 4 Lane Minor Arterial SE INNER LOOP (3)SOUTHWESTERN BLVD MAPLE STREET 100%5,800,000$5,800,000$ F-10 4 Lane Minor Arterial SOUTHWESTERN BLVD (1)RAINTREE DR 1500' S OF RAINTREE DR 100%2,700,000$2,700,000$ F-11 4 Lane Minor Arterial SOUTHWESTERN BLVD (2)1500' S OF RAINTREE DR SE INNER LOOP 50%2,400,000$1,200,000$ F-12 4 Lane Major Arterial SOUTHWESTERN BLVD (3)SE INNER LOOP SAM HOUSTON AVE 100%6,100,000$6,100,000$ F-13 4 Lane Major Arterial SOUTHWESTERN BLVD (4)SAM HOUSTON AVE FAIRHAVEN GTWY 100%5,600,000$5,600,000$ F-14 4 Lane Major Arterial SOUTHWESTERN BLVD (5)FAIRHAVEN GTWY WESTINGHOUSE RD 100%6,500,000$6,500,000$ F-15 4 Lane Collector ROCKRIDE LN (1)SE INNER LOOP SAM HOUSTON AVE 100%4,500,000$4,500,000$ F-16 4 Lane Collector ROCKRIDE LN (2)SAM HOUSTON AVE 2200' S OF SAM HOUSTON AVE 50%3,100,000$1,550,000$ F-17 4 Lane Collector ROCKRIDE LN (3)2200' S OF SAM HOUSTON AVE 2700' S OF SAM HOUSTON AVE 100%1,300,000$1,300,000$ F-18 4 Lane Minor Arterial CARLSON COVE 1900' E OF ROCK RIDE LN SAM HOUSTON AVE 100%7,300,000$7,300,000$ F-19 4 Lane Major Arterial PATRIOT WAY (1)SH 130 FRONTAGE SAM HOUSTON AVE 100%4,800,000$4,800,000$ F-20 4 Lane Major Arterial SAM HOUSTON (1)SOUTHWESTERN BLVD PATRIOT WAY 100%16,200,000$16,200,000$ F-21 2 Lane Major Arterial SAM HOUSTON (2)PATRIOT WAY 2900' E OF SH 130 NB 100%5,700,000$5,700,000$ F-22 4 Lane Minor Arterial BELL GIN RD SAM HOUSTON AVE WESTINGHOUSE RD 50%13,700,000$6,850,000$ F-23 4 Lane Major Arterial WESTINGHOUSE RD MAPLE ST BELL GIN RD 50%15,700,000$7,850,000$ 148,200,000$111,750,000$ City of Georgetown - 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Capital Improvement Plan for Transportation Impact Fees Summary of Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections #IF Class Project Limits Percent in Service Area Project Cost Total Cost in Service Area TOTAL 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Georgetown, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections PRE-CREDIT DRAFT Page 220 of 276 City of Georgetown - 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Capital Improvement Plan for Transportation Impact Fees Summary of Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Intersection Improvements - Service Area F Improvement 1 Improvement 2 CI-10;FI-1 TURN LANE -50%400,000$200,000$ EI-12;FI-2 INNOVATIVE -50%10,000,000$5,000,000$ EI-13;FI-3 INNOVATIVE -50%10,000,000$5,000,000$ FI-4 SIGNAL TURN LANE 75%640,000$480,000$ FI-5 SIGNAL -50%500,000$250,000$ FI-6 SIGNAL -100%500,000$500,000$ FI-7 SIGNAL -100%500,000$500,000$ FI-8 SIGNAL TURN LANE 100%640,000$640,000$ FI-9 OTHER -17%20,000,000$3,340,000$ 43,180,000$15,910,000$ #Project Improvement Percent in Service Area Project Cost Total Cost in Service Area ITS SYSTEM UPGRADE E UNIVERSITY AVE AND HUTTO RD SE INNER LOOP AND MAPLE STREET SAM HOUSTON AVE AND MAPLE STREET TOTAL NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this Appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. These planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. SOUTHWESTERN BLVD AND SE INNER LOOP ROCK RIDE LANE AND SE INNER LOOP SH130 AND PATRIOT WAY SAM HOUSTON AVE AND SOUTHWESTERN BLVD SAM HOUSTON AVE AND ROCK RIDE LN 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Georgetown, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections PRE-CREDIT DRAFT Page 221 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.C-8;F-1 Name:E SH 29 (1) Limits:HAVEN STREET to 300' E OF REINHARDT BLVD Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):6,971 Service Area(s):C,F Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Street Excavation 31,239 cy 15.00$469,000$ 205 6" Asphalt (Type C)13,291 ton 110.00$1,462,000$ 305 16" Base 22,719 cy 40.00$909,000$ 405 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)51,119 sy 11.00$562,000$ 505 6' Concrete Sidewalk 83,649 sf 5.00$418,000$ 605 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 27,883 lf 16.00$446,000$ 705 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:4,591,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%230,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%92,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%1,607,000$ √Illumination 5%230,000$ √Special Drainage Structures Bridge Crossing 2,500,000$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%92,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%92,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%92,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%230,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%367,280$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:5,532,280$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:10,123,280$ Construction Contingency:15%1,518,000$ Mobilization 8%810,000$ Prep ROW 5%506,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:13,000,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-13,000,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%2,080,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution)3,020,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 222 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.C-10;F-2 Name:E SH 29 (3) Limits:300' E OF OWEN CIR to SH 130 Impact Fee Class:Access Management Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):432 Service Area(s):C,F Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 104 Unclassified Street Excavation 528 cy 15.00$8,000$ 204 Asphalt (Type C)0 ton 110.00$-$ 304 Base 0 cy 40.00$-$ 404 Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 504 6' Concrete Sidewalk 0 sf 5.00$-$ 604 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 864 lf 16.00$14,000$ 704 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:347,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%17,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%7,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%121,000$ √Illumination 5%17,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%7,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%7,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%7,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%17,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%27,760$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:227,760$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:574,760$ Construction Contingency:15%86,000$ Mobilization 8%46,000$ Prep ROW 5%29,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:800,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-800,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%128,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution)180,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the construction of a median in the existing center turn lane. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 223 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.E-26;F-3 Name:MAPLE ST (1) Limits:E 22ND STREET to BRITTANIA BLVD Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Collector Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):529 Service Area(s):E,F Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 106 Unclassified Street Excavation 1,078 cy 15.00$16,000$ 206 2" Asphalt (Type C)336 ton 110.00$37,000$ 306 8" Base 862 cy 40.00$34,000$ 406 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)3,881 sy 11.00$43,000$ 506 6' Concrete Sidewalk 6,350 sf 5.00$32,000$ 606 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 2,117 lf 16.00$34,000$ 706 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:521,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%26,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%10,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%182,000$ √Illumination 5%26,000$ √Special Drainage Structures Bridge Crossing 1,700,000$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%10,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%10,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%10,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%26,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%41,680$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:2,041,680$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:2,562,680$ Construction Contingency:15%384,000$ Mobilization 8%205,000$ Prep ROW 5%128,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:3,300,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-3,300,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%528,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:3,800,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 224 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.E-27;F-4 Name:MAPLE ST (2) Limits:BRITTANIA BLVD to SE INNER LOOP Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Collector Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):4,805 Service Area(s):E,F Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 106 Unclassified Street Excavation 9,787 cy 15.00$147,000$ 206 2" Asphalt (Type C)3,054 ton 110.00$336,000$ 306 8" Base 7,830 cy 40.00$313,000$ 406 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)35,234 sy 11.00$388,000$ 506 6' Concrete Sidewalk 57,655 sf 5.00$288,000$ 606 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 19,218 lf 16.00$307,000$ 706 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:2,104,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%105,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%42,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%736,000$ √Illumination 5%105,000$ √Special Drainage Structures Bridge Crossing 8,700,000$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%42,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%42,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%42,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%105,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%168,320$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:10,087,320$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:12,191,320$ Construction Contingency:15%1,829,000$ Mobilization 8%975,000$ Prep ROW 5%610,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:15,700,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-15,700,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%2,512,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:18,200,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 225 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.E-28;F-5 Name:MAPLE ST (3) Limits:SE INNER LOOP to PINNACLE DR Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Collector Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):4,139 Service Area(s):E,F Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 106 Unclassified Street Excavation 8,430 cy 15.00$126,000$ 206 2" Asphalt (Type C)2,630 ton 110.00$289,000$ 306 8" Base 6,744 cy 40.00$270,000$ 406 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)30,349 sy 11.00$334,000$ 506 6' Concrete Sidewalk 49,663 sf 5.00$248,000$ 606 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 16,554 lf 16.00$265,000$ 706 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:1,857,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%93,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%37,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%650,000$ √Illumination 5%93,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%37,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%37,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%37,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%93,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%148,560$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:1,225,560$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:3,082,560$ Construction Contingency:15%462,000$ Mobilization 8%247,000$ Prep ROW 5%154,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:4,000,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-4,000,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%640,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:4,600,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 226 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.E-29;F-6 Name:MAPLE ST (4) Limits:PINNACLE DR to WESTINGHOUSE RD Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Collector Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):4,414 Service Area(s):E,F Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 106 Unclassified Street Excavation 8,991 cy 15.00$135,000$ 206 2" Asphalt (Type C)2,805 ton 110.00$309,000$ 306 8" Base 7,192 cy 40.00$288,000$ 406 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)32,366 sy 11.00$356,000$ 506 6' Concrete Sidewalk 52,963 sf 5.00$265,000$ 606 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 17,654 lf 16.00$282,000$ 706 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:1,960,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%98,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%39,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%686,000$ √Illumination 5%98,000$ √Special Drainage Structures Minor Stream Crossing 200,000$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%39,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%39,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%39,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%98,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%156,800$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:1,492,800$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:3,452,800$ Construction Contingency:15%518,000$ Mobilization 8%276,000$ Prep ROW 5%173,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:4,500,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-4,500,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%720,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:5,200,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 227 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.F-7 Name:SE INNER LOOP (1) Limits:UNIVERSITY AVE to ROCKRIDE LN Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Minor Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):6,308 Service Area(s):F Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Street Excavation 20,560 cy 15.00$308,000$ 202 4" Asphalt (Type C)8,018 ton 110.00$882,000$ 302 12" Base 15,420 cy 40.00$617,000$ 402 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)46,260 sy 11.00$509,000$ 502 6' Concrete Sidewalk 75,698 sf 5.00$378,000$ 602 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 25,233 lf 16.00$404,000$ 702 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:3,423,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%171,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%68,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%1,198,000$ √Illumination 5%171,000$ √Special Drainage Structures Minor Stream Crossing 200,000$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%68,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%68,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%68,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%171,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%273,840$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:2,456,840$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:5,879,840$ Construction Contingency:15%882,000$ Mobilization 8%470,000$ Prep ROW 5%294,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:7,600,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-7,600,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%1,216,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:8,800,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the construction of a new 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 228 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.F-8 Name:SE INNER LOOP (2) Limits:ROCKRIDE LN to SOUTHWESTERN BLVD Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Minor Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):1,409 Service Area(s):F Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Street Excavation 4,593 cy 15.00$69,000$ 202 4" Asphalt (Type C)1,791 ton 110.00$197,000$ 302 12" Base 3,445 cy 40.00$138,000$ 402 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)10,334 sy 11.00$114,000$ 502 6' Concrete Sidewalk 16,910 sf 5.00$85,000$ 602 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 5,637 lf 16.00$90,000$ 702 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:1,018,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%51,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%20,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%356,000$ √Illumination 5%51,000$ √Special Drainage Structures Bridge Crossing 300,000$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%20,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%20,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%20,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%51,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%81,440$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:970,440$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:1,988,440$ Construction Contingency:15%298,000$ Mobilization 8%159,000$ Prep ROW 5%99,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:2,600,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-2,600,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%416,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:3,000,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 229 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.F-9 Name:SE INNER LOOP (3) Limits:SOUTHWESTERN BLVD to MAPLE STREET Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Minor Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):4,049 Service Area(s):F Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Street Excavation 13,197 cy 15.00$198,000$ 202 4" Asphalt (Type C)5,147 ton 110.00$566,000$ 302 12" Base 9,898 cy 40.00$396,000$ 402 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)29,693 sy 11.00$327,000$ 502 6' Concrete Sidewalk 48,589 sf 5.00$243,000$ 602 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 16,196 lf 16.00$259,000$ 702 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:2,314,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%116,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%46,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%810,000$ √Illumination 5%116,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%46,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%46,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%46,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%116,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%185,120$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:1,527,120$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:3,841,120$ Construction Contingency:15%576,000$ Mobilization 8%307,000$ Prep ROW 5%192,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:5,000,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-5,000,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%800,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:5,800,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 230 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.F-10 Name:SOUTHWESTERN BLVD (1) Limits:RAINTREE DR to 1500' S OF RAINTREE DR Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Minor Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):1,498 Service Area(s):F Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Street Excavation 4,883 cy 15.00$73,000$ 202 4" Asphalt (Type C)1,904 ton 110.00$209,000$ 302 12" Base 3,662 cy 40.00$146,000$ 402 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)10,987 sy 11.00$121,000$ 502 6' Concrete Sidewalk 17,979 sf 5.00$90,000$ 602 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 5,993 lf 16.00$96,000$ 702 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:1,060,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%53,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%21,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%371,000$ √Illumination 5%53,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%21,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%21,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%21,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%53,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%84,800$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:698,800$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:1,758,800$ Construction Contingency:15%264,000$ Mobilization 8%141,000$ Prep ROW 5%88,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:2,300,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-2,300,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%368,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:2,700,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 231 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.F-11 Name:SOUTHWESTERN BLVD (2) Limits:1500' S OF RAINTREE DR to SE INNER LOOP Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Minor Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):1,337 Service Area(s):F,ETJ/OTHER Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Street Excavation 4,357 cy 15.00$65,000$ 202 4" Asphalt (Type C)1,699 ton 110.00$187,000$ 302 12" Base 3,268 cy 40.00$131,000$ 402 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)9,804 sy 11.00$108,000$ 502 6' Concrete Sidewalk 16,042 sf 5.00$80,000$ 602 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 5,347 lf 16.00$86,000$ 702 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:982,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%49,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%20,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%344,000$ √Illumination 5%49,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%20,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%20,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%20,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%49,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%78,560$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:649,560$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:1,631,560$ Construction Contingency:15%245,000$ Mobilization 8%131,000$ Prep ROW 5%82,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:2,100,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-2,100,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%336,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:2,400,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 232 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.F-12 Name:SOUTHWESTERN BLVD (3) Limits:SE INNER LOOP to SAM HOUSTON AVE Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):3,481 Service Area(s):F Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Street Excavation 15,599 cy 15.00$234,000$ 205 6" Asphalt (Type C)6,637 ton 110.00$730,000$ 305 16" Base 11,345 cy 40.00$454,000$ 405 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)25,526 sy 11.00$281,000$ 505 6' Concrete Sidewalk 41,770 sf 5.00$209,000$ 605 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 13,923 lf 16.00$223,000$ 705 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:2,456,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%123,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%49,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%860,000$ √Illumination 5%123,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%49,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%49,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%49,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%123,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%196,480$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:1,621,480$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:4,077,480$ Construction Contingency:15%612,000$ Mobilization 8%326,000$ Prep ROW 5%204,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:5,300,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-5,300,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%848,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:6,100,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 233 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.F-13 Name:SOUTHWESTERN BLVD (4) Limits:SAM HOUSTON AVE to FAIRHAVEN GTWY Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):3,145 Service Area(s):F Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Street Excavation 14,094 cy 15.00$211,000$ 205 6" Asphalt (Type C)5,996 ton 110.00$660,000$ 305 16" Base 10,250 cy 40.00$410,000$ 405 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)23,063 sy 11.00$254,000$ 505 6' Concrete Sidewalk 37,739 sf 5.00$189,000$ 605 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 12,580 lf 16.00$201,000$ 705 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:2,250,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%113,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%45,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%788,000$ √Illumination 5%113,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%45,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%45,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%45,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%113,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%180,000$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:1,487,000$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:3,737,000$ Construction Contingency:15%561,000$ Mobilization 8%299,000$ Prep ROW 5%187,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:4,800,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-4,800,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%768,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:5,600,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 234 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.F-14 Name:SOUTHWESTERN BLVD (5) Limits:FAIRHAVEN GTWY to WESTINGHOUSE RD Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):3,725 Service Area(s):F,ETJ/OTHER Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Street Excavation 16,693 cy 15.00$250,000$ 205 6" Asphalt (Type C)7,102 ton 110.00$781,000$ 305 16" Base 12,140 cy 40.00$486,000$ 405 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)27,315 sy 11.00$300,000$ 505 6' Concrete Sidewalk 44,698 sf 5.00$223,000$ 605 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 14,899 lf 16.00$238,000$ 705 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:2,603,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%130,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%52,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%911,000$ √Illumination 5%130,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%52,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%52,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%52,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%130,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%208,240$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:1,717,240$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:4,320,240$ Construction Contingency:15%648,000$ Mobilization 8%346,000$ Prep ROW 5%216,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:5,600,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-5,600,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%896,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:6,500,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the construction of a new 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 235 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.F-15 Name:ROCKRIDE LN (1) Limits:SE INNER LOOP to SAM HOUSTON AVE Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Collector Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):4,011 Service Area(s):F Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 106 Unclassified Street Excavation 8,170 cy 15.00$123,000$ 206 2" Asphalt (Type C)2,549 ton 110.00$280,000$ 306 8" Base 6,536 cy 40.00$261,000$ 406 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)29,411 sy 11.00$324,000$ 506 6' Concrete Sidewalk 48,126 sf 5.00$241,000$ 606 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 16,042 lf 16.00$257,000$ 706 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:1,811,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%91,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%36,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%634,000$ √Illumination 5%91,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%36,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%36,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%36,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%91,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%144,880$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:1,195,880$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:3,006,880$ Construction Contingency:15%451,000$ Mobilization 8%241,000$ Prep ROW 5%150,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:3,900,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-3,900,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%624,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:4,500,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 236 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.F-16 Name:ROCKRIDE LN (2) Limits:SAM HOUSTON AVE to 2200' S OF SAM HOUSTON AVE Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Collector Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):2,144 Service Area(s):F,ETJ/OTHER Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 106 Unclassified Street Excavation 4,368 cy 15.00$66,000$ 206 2" Asphalt (Type C)1,363 ton 110.00$150,000$ 306 8" Base 3,494 cy 40.00$140,000$ 406 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)15,723 sy 11.00$173,000$ 506 6' Concrete Sidewalk 25,729 sf 5.00$129,000$ 606 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 8,576 lf 16.00$137,000$ 706 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:1,120,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%56,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%22,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%392,000$ √Illumination 5%56,000$ √Special Drainage Structures Minor Stream Crossing 200,000$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%22,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%22,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%22,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%56,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%89,600$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:937,600$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:2,057,600$ Construction Contingency:15%309,000$ Mobilization 8%165,000$ Prep ROW 5%103,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:2,700,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-2,700,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%432,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:3,100,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 237 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/11/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.F-17 Name:ROCKRIDE LN (3) Limits:2200' S OF SAM HOUSTON AVE to 2700' S OF SAM HOUSTON AVE Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Collector Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):480 Service Area(s):F,ETJ/OTHER Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 106 Unclassified Street Excavation 978 cy 15.00$15,000$ 206 2" Asphalt (Type C)305 ton 110.00$34,000$ 306 8" Base 783 cy 40.00$31,000$ 406 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)3,522 sy 11.00$39,000$ 506 6' Concrete Sidewalk 5,764 sf 5.00$29,000$ 606 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 1,921 lf 16.00$31,000$ 706 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:504,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%25,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%10,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%176,000$ √Illumination 5%25,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%10,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%10,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%10,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%25,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%40,320$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:331,320$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:835,320$ Construction Contingency:15%125,000$ Mobilization 8%67,000$ Prep ROW 5%42,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:1,100,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-1,100,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%176,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:1,300,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. This project consists of the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 238 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.F-18 Name:CARLSON COVE Limits:1900' E OF ROCK RIDE LN to SAM HOUSTON AVE Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Minor Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):5,327 Service Area(s):F Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Street Excavation 17,361 cy 15.00$260,000$ 202 4" Asphalt (Type C)6,771 ton 110.00$745,000$ 302 12" Base 13,021 cy 40.00$521,000$ 402 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)39,063 sy 11.00$430,000$ 502 6' Concrete Sidewalk 63,921 sf 5.00$320,000$ 602 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 21,307 lf 16.00$341,000$ 702 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:2,942,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%147,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%59,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%1,030,000$ √Illumination 5%147,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%59,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%59,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%59,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%147,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%235,360$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:1,942,360$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:4,884,360$ Construction Contingency:15%733,000$ Mobilization 8%391,000$ Prep ROW 5%244,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:6,300,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-6,300,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%1,008,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:7,300,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 239 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.F-19 Name:PATRIOT WAY (1) Limits:SH 130 FRONTAGE to SAM HOUSTON AVE Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):2,384 Service Area(s):F Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Street Excavation 10,686 cy 15.00$160,000$ 205 6" Asphalt (Type C)4,546 ton 110.00$500,000$ 305 16" Base 7,772 cy 40.00$311,000$ 405 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)17,486 sy 11.00$192,000$ 505 6' Concrete Sidewalk 28,613 sf 5.00$143,000$ 605 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 9,538 lf 16.00$153,000$ 705 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:1,784,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%89,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%36,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%624,000$ √Illumination 5%89,000$ √Special Drainage Structures Minor Stream Crossing 200,000$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%36,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%36,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%36,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%89,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%142,720$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:1,377,720$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:3,161,720$ Construction Contingency:15%474,000$ Mobilization 8%253,000$ Prep ROW 5%158,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:4,100,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-4,100,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%656,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:4,800,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 240 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.F-20 Name:SAM HOUSTON (1) Limits:SOUTHWESTERN BLVD to PATRIOT WAY Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):9,348 Service Area(s):F Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Street Excavation 41,893 cy 15.00$628,000$ 205 6" Asphalt (Type C)17,824 ton 110.00$1,961,000$ 305 16" Base 30,468 cy 40.00$1,219,000$ 405 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)68,553 sy 11.00$754,000$ 505 6' Concrete Sidewalk 112,177 sf 5.00$561,000$ 605 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 37,392 lf 16.00$598,000$ 705 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:6,046,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%302,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%121,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%2,116,000$ √Illumination 5%302,000$ √Special Drainage Structures Minor Stream Crossing 200,000$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%121,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%121,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%121,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%302,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%483,680$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:4,189,680$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:10,235,680$ Construction Contingency:15%1,535,000$ Mobilization 8%819,000$ Prep ROW 5%512,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:13,200,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-13,200,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%2,112,000$ Previous City contribution 870,000$ Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:16,200,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 241 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.F-21 Name:SAM HOUSTON (2) Limits:PATRIOT WAY to 2900' E OF SH 130 NB Impact Fee Class:2 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):6,064 Service Area(s):F Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 107 Unclassified Street Excavation 13,587 cy 15.00$204,000$ 207 6" Asphalt (Type C)5,781 ton 110.00$636,000$ 307 16" Base 9,881 cy 40.00$395,000$ 407 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)22,233 sy 11.00$245,000$ 507 6' Concrete Sidewalk 72,764 sf 5.00$364,000$ 607 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 24,255 lf 16.00$388,000$ 707 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 0 sy 101.59$-$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:2,232,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%112,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%45,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%781,000$ √Illumination 5%112,000$ √Special Drainage Structures Minor Stream Crossing 100,000$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%45,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%45,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%45,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%112,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%178,560$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:1,575,560$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:3,807,560$ Construction Contingency:15%571,000$ Mobilization 8%305,000$ Prep ROW 5%190,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:4,900,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-4,900,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%784,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:5,700,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the construction of a new 2 lane undivided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 242 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.F-22 Name:BELL GIN RD Limits:SAM HOUSTON AVE to WESTINGHOUSE RD Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Minor Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):8,229 Service Area(s):F Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 102 Unclassified Street Excavation 26,820 cy 15.00$402,000$ 202 4" Asphalt (Type C)10,460 ton 110.00$1,151,000$ 302 12" Base 20,115 cy 40.00$805,000$ 402 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)60,346 sy 11.00$664,000$ 502 6' Concrete Sidewalk 98,748 sf 5.00$494,000$ 602 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 32,916 lf 16.00$527,000$ 702 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:4,368,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%218,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%87,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%1,529,000$ √Illumination 5%218,000$ √Special Drainage Structures Bridge Crossing 1,900,000$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%87,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%87,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%87,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%218,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%349,440$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:4,780,440$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:9,148,440$ Construction Contingency:15%1,372,000$ Mobilization 8%732,000$ Prep ROW 5%457,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:11,800,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-11,800,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%1,888,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:13,700,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the construction of a new 2 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 243 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.F-23 Name:WESTINGHOUSE RD Limits:MAPLE ST to BELL GIN RD Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):9,650 Service Area(s):F,ETJ/OTHER Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Street Excavation 43,246 cy 15.00$649,000$ 205 6" Asphalt (Type C)18,399 ton 110.00$2,024,000$ 305 16" Base 31,451 cy 40.00$1,258,000$ 405 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)70,766 sy 11.00$778,000$ 505 6' Concrete Sidewalk 115,799 sf 5.00$579,000$ 605 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 38,600 lf 16.00$618,000$ 705 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:6,231,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%312,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%125,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%2,181,000$ √Illumination 5%312,000$ √Special Drainage Structures Minor Stream Crossing 200,000$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%125,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%125,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%125,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%312,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%498,480$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:4,315,480$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:10,546,480$ Construction Contingency:15%1,582,000$ Mobilization 8%844,000$ Prep ROW 5%527,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:13,500,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-13,500,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%2,160,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:15,700,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 244 of 276 Roadway Improvements - Service Area Sun City From To SC-1 4 Lane Major Arterial RONALD W REAGAN BLVD (1)SOMERSET HILLS 700' W OF CR 245 50%4,300,000$2,150,000$ SC-2 4 Lane Major Arterial RONALD W REAGAN BLVD (2)700' W OF CR 245 1100' E OF SILVER SPUR BLVD 100%12,100,000$12,100,000$ SC-3 4 Lane Major Arterial RONALD W REAGAN BLVD (3)1100' E OF SILVER SPUR BLVD 3000' E OF SILVER SPUR BLVD 50%3,200,000$1,600,000$ SC-4 4 Lane Major Arterial RONALD W REAGAN BLVD (4)600' W OF RIDGETOP VISTA DR RIDGETOP VISTA DR 100%1,600,000$1,600,000$ SC-5 4 Lane Major Arterial RONALD W REAGAN BLVD (5)RIDGETOP VISTA DR 400' E OF SUN CITY BLVD 50%4,400,000$2,200,000$ SC-6 4 Lane Major Arterial RONALD W REAGAN BLVD (6)400' E OF SUN CITY BLVD TELEGRAPH LN 100%5,600,000$5,600,000$ SC-7 4 Lane Major Arterial RONALD W REAGAN BLVD (7)TELEGRAPH LN 4000' E OF TELEGRAPH LN 50%5,900,000$2,950,000$ SC-8 3 Lane Collector CR 245 (1)RONALD W REAGAN BLVD 1400' S OF RONALD W REAGAN BLVD 100%800,000$800,000$ SC-9 3 Lane Collector CR 245 (2)1400' S OF RONALD W REAGAN BLVD 2300' S OF RONALD W REAGAN BLVD 50%2,900,000$1,450,000$ SC-10 3 Lane Collector CR 245 (3)1200' N OF ROCKY HOLLOW CREEK DR RM 2338 50%1,500,000$750,000$ SC-11 Access Management RM 2338 (1)3000' E OF INDIAN SPRINGS RD 7000' E OF INDIAN SPRINGS RD 50%260,000$130,000$ SC-12 Access Management RM 2338 (2)350' S OF CR 245 W RIDGEWOOD RD 50%274,650$137,325$ SC-13 Access Management WILLIAMS DR 800' E OF HIGHLAND SPRING LN 500' S OF CASALOMA CIR 50%1,500,000$750,000$ 44,334,650$32,217,325$ Intersection Improvements - Service Area Sun City Improvement 1 Improvement 2 SCI-1 SIGNAL -100%500,000$500,000$ SCI-2 SIGNAL -50%500,000$250,000$ SCI-3 SIGNAL -25%500,000$125,000$ SCI-4 TURN LANE -100%140,000$140,000$ SCI-5 TURN LANE -50%70,000$35,000$ SCI-6 TURN LANE -100%70,000$70,000$ SCI-7 SIGNAL TURN LANE 100%570,000$570,000$ SCI-8 TURN LANE -50%140,000$70,000$ SCI-9 OTHER -17%20,000,000$3,340,000$ 22,490,000$5,100,000$ DEL WEBB BLVD AND SUN CITY BLVD SUN CITY BLVD AND SH 195 ITS UPGRADES NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this Appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Geogetown. These planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Project Cost Total Cost in Service Area WILLIAMS DRIVE AND JIM HOGG ROAD TOTAL RONALD REAGAN BLVD AND CR 245 RONALD W REAGAN BLVD AND SUN CITY BLVD CR 245 AND WILLIAMS DR DEL WEBB BLVD AND WHISPERING WIND WILLIAMS DRIVE AND DEL WEBB BLVD Project TOTAL #Improvement Percent in Service Area City of Georgetown - 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Capital Improvement Plan for Roadway Impact Fees Summary of Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections #IF Class Project Limits Percent in Service Area Project Cost Total Cost in Service Area 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Georgetown, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections PRE-CREDIT DRAFT Page 245 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.SC-1 Name:RONALD W REAGAN BLVD (1) Limits:SOMERSET HILLS to 700' W OF CR 245 Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):2,635 Service Area(s):SUN CITY,ETJ/OTHER Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Street Excavation 11,808 cy 15.00$177,000$ 205 6" Asphalt (Type C)5,024 ton 110.00$553,000$ 305 16" Base 8,588 cy 40.00$344,000$ 405 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 505 6' Concrete Sidewalk 31,619 sf 5.00$158,000$ 605 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 10,540 lf 16.00$169,000$ 705 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:1,726,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%86,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%35,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%604,000$ √Illumination 5%86,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%35,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%35,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%35,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%86,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%138,080$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:1,140,080$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:2,866,080$ Construction Contingency:15%430,000$ Mobilization 8%229,000$ Prep ROW 5%143,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:3,700,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-3,700,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%592,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:4,300,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 246 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.SC-2 Name:RONALD W REAGAN BLVD (2) Limits:700' W OF CR 245 to 1100' E OF SILVER SPUR BLVD Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):8,331 Service Area(s):SUN CITY Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Street Excavation 37,335 cy 15.00$560,000$ 205 6" Asphalt (Type C)15,884 ton 110.00$1,747,000$ 305 16" Base 27,152 cy 40.00$1,086,000$ 405 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 505 6' Concrete Sidewalk 99,970 sf 5.00$500,000$ 605 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 33,323 lf 16.00$533,000$ 705 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:4,751,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%238,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%95,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%1,663,000$ √Illumination 5%238,000$ √Special Drainage Structures Minor Stream Crossing 200,000$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%95,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%95,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%95,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%238,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%380,080$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:3,337,080$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:8,088,080$ Construction Contingency:15%1,213,000$ Mobilization 8%647,000$ Prep ROW 5%404,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:10,400,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-10,400,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%1,664,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:12,100,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 247 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection SC- Project Information:Project No.SC-3 Name:RONALD W REAGAN BLVD (3) Limits:1100' E OF SILVER SPUR BLVD to 3000' E OF SILVER SPUR BLVD Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):1,861 Service Area(s):SUN CITY,ETJ/OTHER Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Street Excavation 8,338 cy 15.00$125,000$ 205 6" Asphalt (Type C)3,548 ton 110.00$390,000$ 305 16" Base 6,064 cy 40.00$243,000$ 405 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 505 6' Concrete Sidewalk 22,328 sf 5.00$112,000$ 605 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 7,443 lf 16.00$119,000$ 705 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:1,314,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%66,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%26,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%460,000$ √Illumination 5%66,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%26,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%26,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%26,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%66,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%105,120$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:867,120$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:2,181,120$ Construction Contingency:15%327,000$ Mobilization 8%174,000$ Prep ROW 5%109,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:2,800,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-2,800,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%448,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:3,200,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 248 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection SC- Project Information:Project No.SC-4 Name:RONALD W REAGAN BLVD (4) Limits:600' W OF RIDGETOP VISTA DR to RIDGETOP VISTA DR Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):575 Service Area(s):SUN CITY Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Street Excavation 2,579 cy 15.00$39,000$ 205 6" Asphalt (Type C)1,097 ton 110.00$121,000$ 305 16" Base 1,876 cy 40.00$75,000$ 405 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 505 6' Concrete Sidewalk 6,906 sf 5.00$35,000$ 605 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 2,302 lf 16.00$37,000$ 705 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:632,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%32,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%13,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%221,000$ √Illumination 5%32,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%13,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%13,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%13,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%32,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%50,560$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:419,560$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:1,051,560$ Construction Contingency:15%158,000$ Mobilization 8%84,000$ Prep ROW 5%53,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:1,400,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-1,400,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%224,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:1,600,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 249 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.SC-5 Name:RONALD W REAGAN BLVD (5) Limits:RIDGETOP VISTA DR to 400' E OF SUN CITY BLVD Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):2,004 Service Area(s):SUN CITY,ETJ/OTHER Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Street Excavation 8,981 cy 15.00$135,000$ 205 6" Asphalt (Type C)3,821 ton 110.00$420,000$ 305 16" Base 6,532 cy 40.00$261,000$ 405 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 505 6' Concrete Sidewalk 24,049 sf 5.00$120,000$ 605 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 8,016 lf 16.00$128,000$ 705 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:1,389,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%69,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%28,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%486,000$ √Illumination 5%69,000$ √Special Drainage Structures Bridge Crossing 600,000$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%28,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%28,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%28,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%69,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%111,120$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:1,516,120$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:2,905,120$ Construction Contingency:15%436,000$ Mobilization 8%232,000$ Prep ROW 5%145,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:3,800,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-3,800,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%608,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:4,400,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 250 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.SC-6 Name:RONALD W REAGAN BLVD (6) Limits:400' E OF SUN CITY BLVD to TELEGRAPH LN Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):1,347 Service Area(s):SUN CITY Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Street Excavation 6,038 cy 15.00$91,000$ 205 6" Asphalt (Type C)2,569 ton 110.00$283,000$ 305 16" Base 4,391 cy 40.00$176,000$ 405 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 505 6' Concrete Sidewalk 16,168 sf 5.00$81,000$ 605 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 5,389 lf 16.00$86,000$ 705 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:1,042,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%52,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%21,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%365,000$ √Illumination 5%52,000$ √Special Drainage Structures Bridge Crossing 2,000,000$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%21,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%21,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%21,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%52,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%83,360$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:2,688,360$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:3,730,360$ Construction Contingency:15%560,000$ Mobilization 8%298,000$ Prep ROW 5%187,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:4,800,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-4,800,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%768,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:5,600,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 251 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.SC-7 Name:RONALD W REAGAN BLVD (7) Limits:TELEGRAPH LN to 4000' E OF TELEGRAPH LN Impact Fee Class:4 Lane Major Arterial Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):3,894 Service Area(s):SUN CITY,ETJ/OTHER Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 105 Unclassified Street Excavation 17,449 cy 15.00$262,000$ 205 6" Asphalt (Type C)7,424 ton 110.00$817,000$ 305 16" Base 12,690 cy 40.00$508,000$ 405 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 505 6' Concrete Sidewalk 46,723 sf 5.00$234,000$ 605 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 15,574 lf 16.00$249,000$ 705 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:2,395,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%120,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%48,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%838,000$ √Illumination 5%120,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%48,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%48,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%48,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%120,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%191,600$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:1,581,600$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:3,976,600$ Construction Contingency:15%596,000$ Mobilization 8%318,000$ Prep ROW 5%199,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:5,100,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-5,100,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%816,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:5,900,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 4 lane divided arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 252 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection S Project Information:Project No.SC-8 Name:CR 245 (1) Limits:RONALD W REAGAN BLVD to 1400' S OF RONALD W REAGAN BLVD Impact Fee Class:3 Lane Collector Ultimate Class:3U Length (lf):1,328 Service Area(s):SUN CITY Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Street Excavation 1,681 cy 15.00$25,000$ 203 2" Asphalt (Type C)552 ton 110.00$61,000$ 303 8" Base 1,345 cy 40.00$54,000$ 403 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 503 6' Concrete Sidewalk 15,939 sf 5.00$80,000$ 603 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 5,313 lf 16.00$85,000$ 703 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 0 sy 101.59$-$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:305,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%15,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%6,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%107,000$ √Illumination 5%15,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%6,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%6,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%6,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%15,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%24,400$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:200,400$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:505,400$ Construction Contingency:15%76,000$ Mobilization 8%40,000$ Prep ROW 5%25,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:700,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-700,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%112,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:800,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. This project consists of the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 3 lane collector. Description: NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 253 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.SC-9 Name:CR 245 (2) Limits:1400' S OF RONALD W REAGAN BLVD to 2300' S OF RONALD W REAGAN BLVD Impact Fee Class:3 Lane Collector Ultimate Class:3U Length (lf):839 Service Area(s):SUN CITY,ETJ/OTHER Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Street Excavation 1,062 cy 15.00$16,000$ 203 2" Asphalt (Type C)349 ton 110.00$38,000$ 303 8" Base 850 cy 40.00$34,000$ 403 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 503 6' Concrete Sidewalk 10,071 sf 5.00$50,000$ 603 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 3,357 lf 16.00$54,000$ 703 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 0 sy 101.59$-$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:192,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%10,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%4,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%67,000$ √Illumination 5%10,000$ √Special Drainage Structures Bridge Crossing 1,600,000$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%4,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%4,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%4,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%10,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%15,360$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:1,728,360$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:1,920,360$ Construction Contingency:15%288,000$ Mobilization 8%154,000$ Prep ROW 5%96,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:2,500,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-2,500,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%400,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:2,900,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. This project consists of the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 3 lane collector. Description: NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 254 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.SC-10 Name:CR 245 (3) Limits:1200' N OF ROCKY HOLLOW CREEK DR to RM 2338 Impact Fee Class:3 Lane Collector Ultimate Class:3U Length (lf):2,495 Service Area(s):SUN CITY,ETJ/OTHER Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Street Excavation 3,158 cy 15.00$47,000$ 203 2" Asphalt (Type C)1,037 ton 110.00$114,000$ 303 8" Base 2,526 cy 40.00$101,000$ 403 10" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 503 6' Concrete Sidewalk 29,945 sf 5.00$150,000$ 603 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 9,982 lf 16.00$160,000$ 703 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 0 sy 101.59$-$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:572,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%29,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%11,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%200,000$ √Illumination 5%29,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%11,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%11,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%11,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%29,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%45,760$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:376,760$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:948,760$ Construction Contingency:15%142,000$ Mobilization 8%76,000$ Prep ROW 5%47,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:1,300,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-1,300,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%208,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:1,500,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. This project consists of the reconstruction of existing pavement to a 3 lane collector. Description: NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 255 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.SC-11 Name:RM 2338 (1) Limits:3000' E OF INDIAN SPRINGS RD to 7000' E OF INDIAN SPRINGS RD Impact Fee Class:Access Management Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):3,757 Service Area(s):SUN CITY,ETJ/OTHER Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 104 Unclassified Street Excavation 4,592 cy 15.00$69,000$ 204 Asphalt (Type C)0 ton 110.00$-$ 304 Base 0 cy 40.00$-$ 404 Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 504 6' Concrete Sidewalk 0 sf 5.00$-$ 604 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 7,515 lf 16.00$120,000$ 704 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:514,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%26,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%10,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%180,000$ √Illumination 5%26,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%10,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%10,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%10,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%26,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%41,120$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:339,120$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:853,120$ Construction Contingency:15%128,000$ Mobilization 8%68,000$ Prep ROW 5%43,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:1,100,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-1,100,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%176,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution)260,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. This project consists of the construction of a median in the existing center turn lane. Description: NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 256 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.SC-12 Name:RM 2338 (2) Limits:350' S OF CR 245 to W RIDGEWOOD RD Impact Fee Class:Access Management Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):1,898 Service Area(s):SUN CITY,ETJ/OTHER Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 104 Unclassified Street Excavation 2,320 cy 15.00$35,000$ 204 Asphalt (Type C)0 ton 110.00$-$ 304 Base 0 cy 40.00$-$ 404 Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 504 6' Concrete Sidewalk 0 sf 5.00$-$ 604 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 3,796 lf 16.00$61,000$ 704 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:421,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%21,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%8,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%147,000$ √Illumination 5%21,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%8,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%8,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%8,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%21,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%33,680$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:275,680$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:696,680$ Construction Contingency:15%105,000$ Mobilization 8%56,000$ Prep ROW 5%35,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:900,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-900,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%144,000$ Previous City contribution 65,850$ Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution)274,650$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Description: This project consists of the construction of a median in the existing center turn lane. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 257 of 276 City of Georgetown Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee updated:3/10/2020 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Project No.SC-13 Name:WILLIAMS DR Limits:800' E OF HIGHLAND SPRING LN to 500' S OF CASALOMA CIR Impact Fee Class:Access Management Ultimate Class:4D Length (lf):5,249 Service Area(s):SUN CITY,ETJ/OTHER Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 104 Unclassified Street Excavation 6,416 cy 15.00$96,000$ 204 Asphalt (Type C)0 ton 110.00$-$ 304 Base 0 cy 40.00$-$ 404 Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 45#/sy)0 sy 11.00$-$ 504 6' Concrete Sidewalk 0 sf 5.00$-$ 604 Machine Laid Curb & Gutter 10,499 lf 16.00$168,000$ 704 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 3,200 sy 101.59$325,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:589,000$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%29,000$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Shared Paths 2%12,000$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35%206,000$ √Illumination 5%29,000$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated -$ √Water Minor Adjustments 2%12,000$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%12,000$ √Turf and Erosion Control 2%12,000$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 5%29,000$ √Miscellaneous:8%47,120$ Other Major Items None Anticipated -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:388,120$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:977,120$ Construction Contingency:15%147,000$ Mobilization 8%78,000$ Prep ROW 5%49,000$ Construction Cost TOTAL:1,300,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:-1,300,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:16%208,000$ Previous City contribution Other Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:1,500,000$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. This project consists of the construction of a median in the existing center turn lane. Description: NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Georgetown. 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Page 258 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT B Appendix B – Roadway Impact Fee CIP Service Units of Supply Page 259 of 276 Service Area A 3/11/2020 VEH-MI VEH-MI VEH-MI EXCESS LENGTH CAPACITY SUPPLY TOTAL CAPACITY (MI)PK-HR PK-HR DEMAND PK-HR PER LN TOTAL1 PK-HR2 VEH-MI3 A-1 Shell Rd (1)Sh 195 Wb To 1200' S Of Sh 195 0.11 4 4 Lane Major Arterial 786 50%810 181 44 137 320,000$160,000$ A-2 Shell Rd (2)1200' S Of Sh 195 To 200' S Of Shell Stone Trl 0.09 4 4 Lane Major Arterial 786 100%810 304 74 230 300,000$300,000$ A-3 Shell Rd (3)200' S Of Shell Stone Trl To Scenic Oaks Dr 0.11 4 4 Lane Major Arterial 786 50%810 185 45 140 320,000$160,000$ A-4 Shell Rd (4)Scenic Oaks Dr To 2015' S Of Scenic Oaks Dr 0.38 4 4 Lane Major Arterial 786 100%810 1,236 300 936 760,000$760,000$ A-5 Shell Rd (5)2015' S Of Scenic Oaks Dr To 4315' S Of Scenic Oaks Dr 0.44 4 4 Lane Major Arterial 786 50%810 706 171 535 980,000$490,000$ A-6 Shell Rd (6)4315' S Of Scenic Oaks Dr To 4790' S Of Scenic Oaks Dr 0.09 4 4 Lane Major Arterial 786 100%810 292 71 221 300,000$300,000$ A-7 Shell Rd (7)4790' S Of Scenic Oaks Dr To 5170' S Of Scenic Oaks Dr 0.09 4 4 Lane Major Arterial 786 50%810 147 36 111 300,000$150,000$ A-8 Shell Rd (8)1870' S Of Shell Spur To 5170' S Of Scenic Oaks Dr 0.71 4 4 Lane Major Arterial 786 100%810 2,287 555 1,732 1,140,000$1,140,000$ A-9 Shell Rd (9)900' S Of Bowline Dr To 300' N Of Sycamore St 0.53 4 4 Lane Major Arterial 1,020 50%810 859 270 589 980,000$490,000$ A-10 Berry Creek Dr Airport Rd To Sh 195 0.70 4 4 Lane Minor Arterial 424 100%510 1,433 298 1,135 4,900,000$4,900,000$ A-11 Airport Rd (1)Berry Creek Dr To 475' N Of Indian Mound Rd 0.11 4 4 Lane Minor Arterial 424 100%510 216 45 171 2,300,000$2,300,000$ A-12 Airport Rd (2)475' N Of Indian Mound Rd To 500' N Of Sanaloma Dr 0.69 4 4 Lane Minor Arterial 424 50%510 701 146 555 6,700,000$3,350,000$ A-13 Airport Rd (3)Cavu Rd To 300' S Of Vortac Ln 0.25 4 4 Lane Minor Arterial 424 50%510 251 52 199 2,200,000$1,100,000$ A-14 Airport Rd (4)300' S Of Vortac Ln To Lakeway Dr 0.95 4 4 Lane Minor Arterial 424 100%510 1,944 404 1,540 5,900,000$5,900,000$ A-15 Lakeway Dr Northwest Blvd To Airport Rd 1.13 4 4 Lane Collector 667 100%680 3,065 751 2,314 6,000,000$6,000,000$ A-16 Shell Rd (10)500' N Of Bowline Dr To 200' N Of Sycamore St 0.36 4 4 Lane Major Arterial 1,020 50%810 577 182 395 680,000$340,000$ A-17 Shell Rd (11)300' N Of Sycamore St To 600' N Of Bellaire Dr 0.14 4 4 Lane Major Arterial 1,020 100%810 466 147 319 380,000$380,000$ A-18 Shell Rd (12)600' N Of Bellaire Dr To Verde Vista 0.72 4 4 Lane Major Arterial 1,025 100%810 2,322 735 1,587 1,160,000$1,160,000$ A-19 Shell Rd (13)Verde Vista To 500' N Of Williams Dr 0.26 4 4 Lane Collector 1,025 100%680 719 271 448 380,000$380,000$ A-20 Verde Vista Williams Dr To 1500' E Of Williams Dr 0.28 4 4 Lane Collector n/a 100%680 762 0 762 2,000,000$2,000,000$ A-21 Wildwood Dr Verde Vista Dr To Williams Dr 0.31 2 3 Lane Collector 167 100%570 355 52 303 1,000,000$1,000,000$ A-22; B-1 Williams Dr (2)400' N Of Bettie Mae Way To 1200' E Of Country Rd 2.04 4 Access Management 2,292 50%810 3,312 2,343 969 2,600,000$1,300,000$ A-23;B-2 Williams Dr (3)900' E Of La Paloma Dr To Country Rd 0.22 4 Access Management 2,292 50%810 363 257 106 1,100,000$550,000$ A-24; B-3 Williams Dr (4)Country Rd To S Ih 35 Sb 2.40 4 Access Management 3,132 50%810 3,896 3,766 130 2,900,000$1,450,000$ A-25 Lakeway Dr Whisper Oaks Ln To Williams Dr 0.38 2 3 Lane Collector 1,146 100%570 437 439 -2 1,200,000$1,200,000$ A-26 Rivery Blvd Northwest Blvd To Williams Drive 0.53 4 4 Lane Minor Arterial n/a 100%510 1,081 0 1,081 4,335,000$4,335,000$ 28,097 11,454 16,643 51,135,000$41,595,000$ AI-1 Sh 195 And Shell Rd Innovative --25%10,000,000$2,500,000$ AI-2 Berry Creek Dr And Sh 195 Signal --100%500,000$500,000$ AI-3 Ih35/Sh195 Ramp And Frontage Turn Lane --50%200,000$100,000$ AI-4 Ih35/Sh195 Ramp And Frontage Turn Lane --50%200,000$100,000$ AI-5 Bellaire Drive And Shell Road Signal --50%500,000$250,000$ AI-6 Luna Trail And Serenada Drive Turn Lane & Turn Lane --50%140,000$70,000$ AI-7 Northwest Blvd And Serenada Dr Roundabout & Turn Lane --50%2,070,000$1,035,000$ AI-8 N Ih 35 Frontage And Sh 130 Frontage Signal --50%500,000$250,000$ AI-9;CI-1 N Ih 35 Frontage And Sh 130 Frontage Signal --50%500,000$250,000$ AI-10 Wildwood Drive And Verde Vista Roundabout --25%2,000,000$500,000$ AI-11 Verde Vista Drive And Shell Road Signal --100%500,000$500,000$ AI-12;BI-1 Woodlake Drive And Williams Drive Turn Lane --50%400,000$200,000$ AI-13;BI-2 Wildwood Drive And Williams Drive Turn Lane --50%400,000$200,000$ AI-14;BI-3 Estrella Crossing And Williams Drive Signal & Turn Lane --50%900,000$450,000$ AI-15;BI-4 Serenada Drive And Williams Drive Turn Lane --50%400,000$200,000$ AI-16;BI-5 Williams Drive And Lakeway Drive Turn Lane --50%400,000$200,000$ AI-17;BI-6 River Bend And Williams Drive Turn Lane --50%400,000$200,000$ AI-18 Lakeway Drive And Northwest Blvd Roundabout --100%2,000,000$2,000,000$ AI-19 Northwest Blvd And Golden Oaks Drive Roundabout --100%2,000,000$2,000,000$ AI-20;CI-4 N Ih 35 And Northwest Blvd Overpass --50%10,115,000$5,057,500$ AI-21 Its System Upgrades Other --17%20,000,000$3,340,000$ 54,125,000$19,902,500$ 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Cost Per Service Area 19,651$ TOTAL COST IN SERVICE AREA B 61,517,151$ 1. Veh-Mi Supply Pk-Hr Total = [Length (mi)] * [Exist Lanes] * [Veh-Mi Capacity Pk-Hr Per Ln] * [% in Service Area] 2. Veh-Mi Demand Pk-Hr Total = [ Length (mi)] * [PM Peak Hour Vol] * [% In Service Area] 3. Excess Capacity Pk-Hr Veh-Mi = [Veh-Mi Supply Pk-Hr Total] - [Veh-Mi Demand Pk-Hr Total] Note: Mileage lengths are shown as rounded to the nearest 0.01. Actual calculations were performed using exact mileage length [Length (ft) / 5,280]. "n/a" are roadways that were not analyzed. Most of these roadways were 2 Lane Collectors or bridges over I-35 included as intersection projects. ROADWAY IMPACT FEE CLASSIFICATION SUBTOTAL PEAK HOUR VOLUME City of Georgetown - 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study CIP Service Units of Supply % IN SERVICE AREA TOTAL PROJECT COST TOTAL PROJECT COST IN SERVICE AREA Project ID #LIMITS LANES SUBTOTAL Intersection Improvements 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown, Texas Appendix B - Transportation Impact Fee CIP Service Units of Suppy PRE-CREDIT DRAFT Page 260 of 276 Service Area B 3/10/2020 VEH-MI VEH-MI VEH-MI EXCESS LENGTH CAPACITY SUPPLY TOTAL CAPACITY (MI)PK-HR PK-HR DEMAND PK-HR PER LN TOTAL1 PK-HR2 VEH-MI3 A-22; B-1 Williams Dr (2)400' N Of Bettie Mae Way To 1200' E Of Country Rd 2.04 4 Access Management 2,292 50%810 3,312 2,343 969 2,600,000$1,300,000$ A-23;B-2 Williams Dr (3)900' E Of La Paloma Dr To Country Rd 0.22 4 Access Management 2,292 50%810 363 257 106 1,100,000$550,000$ A-24; B-3 Williams Dr (4)Country Rd To S Ih 35 Sb 2.40 4 Access Management 3,132 50%810 3,896 3,766 130 2,900,000$1,450,000$ B-4 D B Wood Rd (1)Williams Dr To 1300' S Of Williams Dr 0.24 4 Previously Constructed 1,108 100%810 782 267 515 2,145,000$2,145,000$ B-5 D B Wood Rd (2)1800' S Of Williams Dr To 3200' S Of Williams Dr 0.26 4 Access Management 1,108 50%810 427 146 281 1,000,000$500,000$ B-6 D B Wood Rd (3)3200' S Of Williams Dr To Cedar Breaks Rd 1.29 4 4 Lane Major Arterial 1,108 50%810 2,089 714 1,375 15,900,000$7,950,000$ B-7 D B Wood Rd (4)Cedar Breaks Rd To W University Ave 1.89 4 4 Lane Major Arterial 1,108 100%810 6,117 2,092 4,025 14,800,000$14,800,000$ B-8 Country Rd Williams Dr To 500' S Of Rustle Cv 0.39 2 3 Lane Collector n/a 50%570 220 0 220 1,200,000$600,000$ B-9 Bootys Crossing Rd 400' W Of Pecan Ln To Williams Dr 1.11 2 3 Lane Collector 989 100%570 1,263 1,095 168 4,500,000$4,500,000$ B-10 Wolf Ranch Pkwy Rivery Blvd To Memorial Drive 1.39 4 4 Lane Collector 258 100%680 3,779 358 3,421 6,100,000$6,100,000$ B-11 Memorial Drive (1)Rivr Chase Blvd To Wolf Ranch Pkwy 0.39 2 3 Lane Collector n/a 100%570 447 0 447 1,300,000$1,300,000$ B-12 Memorial Drive (2)Wolf Ranch Pkwy To Wolf Lakes Dr 0.29 4 4 Lane Collector n/a 100%680 792 0 792 2,000,000$2,000,000$ B-13; D-3 W Sh 29 (3)Wood Ct To Wolf Ranch Pkwy 0.75 6 6 Lane Major Arterial 887 50%900 2,027 333 1,694 1,540,000$770,000$ B-14; D-4 W University Ave Wolf Ranch Pkwy To Scenic Dr 0.97 6 6 Lane Major Arterial 887 50%900 2,624 431 2,193 2,320,000$1,160,000$ 28,138 11,802 16,336 59,405,000$e AI-12;BI-1 Woodlake Drive And Williams Drive Turn Lane --50%400,000$200,000$ AI-13;BI-2 Wildwood Drive And Williams Drive Turn Lane --50%400,000$200,000$ AI-14;BI-3 Estrella Crossing And Williams Drive Signal & Turn Lane --25%900,000$225,000$ AI-15;BI-4 Serenada Drive And Williams Drive Turn Lane --50%400,000$200,000$ AI-16;BI-5 Williams Drive And Lakeway Drive Turn Lane --50%400,000$200,000$ AI-17;BI-6 River Bend And Williams Drive Turn Lane --50%400,000$200,000$ BI-7 Db Wood Road And Cedar Breaks Drive Turn Lane & Turn Lane --75%400,000$300,000$ BI-8;DI-1 Db Wood Road And Sh 29 (University)Signal --50%500,000$250,000$ BI-9;DI-2 Scenic Drive And University Ave Turn Lane & Turn Lane --25%140,000$35,000$ BI-10 Its System Upgrade Other --17%20,000,000$3,340,000$ 23,940,000$5,150,000$ 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Cost Per Service Area 19,651$ TOTAL COST IN SERVICE AREA C 5,169,651$ 1. Veh-Mi Supply Pk-Hr Total = [Length (mi)] * [Exist Lanes] * [Veh-Mi Capacity Pk-Hr Per Ln] * [% in Service Area] 2. Veh-Mi Demand Pk-Hr Total = [ Length (mi)] * [PM Peak Hour Vol] * [% In Service Area] 3. Excess Capacity Pk-Hr Veh-Mi = [Veh-Mi Supply Pk-Hr Total] - [Veh-Mi Demand Pk-Hr Total] Note: Mileage lengths are shown as rounded to the nearest 0.01. Actual calculations were performed using exact mileage length [Length (ft) / 5,280]. "n/a" are roadways that were not analyzed. Most of these roadways were 2 Lane Collectors or bridges over I-35 included as intersection projects. TOTAL PROJECT COST IN SERVICE AREA SUBTOTAL City of Georgetown - 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study CIP Service Units of Supply Project ID #ROADWAY LIMITS LANES IMPACT FEE CLASSIFICATION PEAK HOUR VOLUME % IN SERVICE AREA TOTAL PROJECT COST Intersection Improvements SUBTOTAL 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown, Texas Appendix B - Transportation Impact Fee CIP Service Units of Suppy PRE-CREDIT DRAFT Page 261 of 276 Service Area C 3/10/2020 VEH-MI VEH-MI VEH-MI EXCESS LENGTH CAPACITY SUPPLY TOTAL CAPACITY (MI)PK-HR PK-HR DEMAND PK-HR PER LN TOTAL1 PK-HR2 VEH-MI3 C-1 Ne Inner Loop Ih 35 Nb To University Ave 3.12 4 4 Lane Major Arterial 879 100%810 10,110 2,743 7,367 34,700,000$34,700,000$ C-2 Stadium Drive N Austin Ave To Ne Inner Loop 0.49 4 4 Lane Minor Arterial 650 100%510 998 318 680 8,200,000$8,200,000$ C-3 Stadium Drive Ne Inner Loop To 1470' E Of Ne Inner Loop 0.28 4 4 Lane Minor Arterial 650 50%510 283 90 193 2,700,000$1,350,000$ C-4 N Austin Ave Ne Inner Loop To Williams Drive 1.93 4 Access Management 1,520 100%810 6,239 2,927 3,312 420,000$420,000$ C-5 Northwest Blvd N Ih 35 Fwy Nb To N Austin Ave 0.22 4 4 Lane Major Arterial n/a 100%810 719 0 719 2,700,000$2,700,000$ C-6 Fm 971 (1)N Austin Ave To E Morrow St 0.63 4 4 Lane Major Arterial 723 100%810 2,052 458 1,594 2,666,846$2,666,846$ C-7 Fm 971 (2)E Morrow St To Sh 130 Sb 1.26 4 4 Lane Major Arterial 723 100%810 4,076 909 3,167 5,035,521$5,035,521$ C-8;F-1 E Sh 29 (1)Haven Street To 300' E Of Reinhardt Blvd 1.32 4 4 Lane Major Arterial 1,348 50%810 2,139 890 1,249 3,020,000$1,510,000$ C-9 E Sh 29 (2)300' E Of Reinhardt Blvd To 300' E Of Owen Cir 0.42 4 4 Lane Major Arterial 1,348 50%810 680 283 397 840,000$420,000$ C-10;F-2 E Sh 29 (3)300' E Of Owen Cir To Sh 130 0.08 4 Access Management 1,348 50%810 133 55 78 180,000$90,000$ 27,429 8,673 18,756 60,462,367$57,092,367$ AI-9;CI-1 N Ih 35 Frontage And Sh 130 Frontage Signal --50%500,000$250,000$ CI-2 Cr 151 (Stadium Drive) And Austin Avenue Signal --100%500,000$500,000$ CI-3 Inner Loop And Cr 151 (Stadium Drive)Roundabout --100%2,000,000$2,000,000$ AI-20;CI-4 N Ih 35 And Northwest Blvd Overpass --50%10,115,000$5,057,500$ CI-5 N Austin Ave And Fm 971 Signal --100%500,000$500,000$ CI-6 N Austin Ave And Old Airport Rd Turn Lane & Signal --100%784,000$784,000$ CI-7 Fm 971 And Cr 152 Signal --100%500,000$500,000$ CI-8 S Austin Ave And 2Nd St Turn Lane --100%284,000$284,000$ CI-9 Maple Street And Smith Creek Rd Signal --100%500,000$500,000$ CI-10;FI-1 E University Ave And Hutto Rd Turn Lane --50%400,000$200,000$ CI-11 Its System Upgrades Other --17%20,000,000$3,340,000$ 36,083,000$13,915,500$ 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Cost Per Service Area 19,651$ TOTAL COST IN SERVICE AREA C 71,027,518$ 1. Veh-Mi Supply Pk-Hr Total = [Length (mi)] * [Exist Lanes] * [Veh-Mi Capacity Pk-Hr Per Ln] * [% in Service Area] 2. Veh-Mi Demand Pk-Hr Total = [ Length (mi)] * [PM Peak Hour Vol] * [% In Service Area] 3. Excess Capacity Pk-Hr Veh-Mi = [Veh-Mi Supply Pk-Hr Total] - [Veh-Mi Demand Pk-Hr Total] Note: Mileage lengths are shown as rounded to the nearest 0.01. Actual calculations were performed using exact mileage length [Length (ft) / 5,280]. "n/a" are roadways that were not analyzed. Most of these roadways were 2 Lane Collectors or bridges over I-35 included as intersection projects. TOTAL PROJECT COST IN SERVICE AREA SUBTOTAL Intersection Improvements SUBTOTAL City of Georgetown - 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study CIP Service Units of Supply Project ID #ROADWAY LIMITS LANES IMPACT FEE CLASSIFICATION PEAK HOUR VOLUME % IN SERVICE AREA TOTAL PROJECT COST 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown, Texas Appendix B - Transportation Impact Fee CIP Service Units of Suppy PRE-CREDIT DRAFT Page 262 of 276 Service Area D 3/10/2020 VEH-MI VEH-MI VEH-MI EXCESS LENGTH CAPACITY SUPPLY TOTAL CAPACITY (MI)PK-HR PK-HR DEMAND PK-HR PER LN TOTAL1 PK-HR2 VEH-MI3 D-1 W Sh 29 (1) 2500' E Of Gabriel Forest To 1000' E Of Wood Ranch Rd 1.47 6 6 Lane Major Arterial 1,387 50%900 3,958 1,017 2,941 2,840,000$1,420,000$ D-2 W Sh 29 (2)1000' E Of Wood Ranch Rd To Wood Ct 0.25 6 6 Lane Major Arterial 1,387 100%900 1,351 347 1,004 620,000$620,000$ B-13; D-3 W Sh 29 (3)Wood Ct To Wolf Ranch Pkwy 0.75 6 6 Lane Major Arterial 887 50%900 2,027 333 1,694 1,540,000$770,000$ B-14; D-4 W University Ave Wolf Ranch Pkwy To Scenic Dr 0.97 6 6 Lane Major Arterial 887 50%900 2,624 431 2,193 2,320,000$1,160,000$ D-5 D B Wood Rd University Ave To Wolf Ranch Pkwy 0.28 4 4 Lane Minor Arterial 1,108 100%510 572 311 261 2,300,000$2,300,000$ D-6 Wolf Ranch Pkwy University Blvd To Southwest Byp 1.40 4 4 Lane Minor Arterial 258 100%510 2,859 362 2,497 11,072,399$11,072,399$ D-7 Southwest Bypass (1)Wolf Ranch Pkwy To 3400' S Of Wolf Ranch Pkwy 0.63 4 4 Lane Major Arterial 258 100%810 2,045 163 1,882 4,987,068$4,987,068$ D-8 Southwest Bypass (2)3400' S Of Wolf Ranch Pkwy To 900' S Of Rocky Hill Dr 0.47 4 4 Lane Major Arterial 258 50%810 755 60 695 3,683,817$1,841,909$ D-9 Southwest Bypass (3)900' S Of Rocky Hill Dr To Leander Rd 0.25 4 4 Lane Major Arterial 258 100%810 812 65 747 1,979,565$1,979,565$ D-10 Rr 2243 (1)Limestone Creek Rd To River Ridge Dr 5.84 4 4 Lane Major Arterial 1,142 100%810 18,932 6,673 12,259 9,262,556$9,262,556$ D-11 Rr 2243 (2)River Ridge Dr To Ih 35 1.09 4 Access Management 1,142 100%810 3,522 1,242 2,280 904,244$904,244$ D-12 New Southwest Bypass W University Ave To Wolf Ranch Pkwy 0.54 2 2 Lane Major Arterial n/a 100%680 738 0 738 2,300,000$2,300,000$ 40,195 11,004 29,191 43,809,650$38,617,741$ BI-8;DI-1 Db Wood Road And Sh 29 (University)Signal --50%500,000$250,000$ BI-9;DI-2 Scenic Drive And University Ave Turn Lane & Turn Lane --25%140,000$35,000$ DI-3 D B Wood Rd And Wolf Ranch Pkwy Signal --100%500,000$500,000$ DI-4;EI-1 Scenic Drive And W 17Th St Roundabout --50%2,000,000$1,000,000$ DI-5;EI-5 Leander Rd And Scenic Dr Signal --25%500,000$125,000$ DI-6 Leander Road And Escalera Parkway Turn Lane --100%70,000$70,000$ DI-7 W University Ave And Southwest Bypass Signal --100%500,000$500,000$ DI-8 Its System Upgrades Other --17%20,000,000$3,340,000$ 24,210,000$5,820,000$ 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Cost Per Service Area 19,651$ TOTAL COST IN SERVICE AREA C 44,457,392$ 1. Veh-Mi Supply Pk-Hr Total = [Length (mi)] * [Exist Lanes] * [Veh-Mi Capacity Pk-Hr Per Ln] * [% in Service Area] 2. Veh-Mi Demand Pk-Hr Total = [ Length (mi)] * [PM Peak Hour Vol] * [% In Service Area] 3. Excess Capacity Pk-Hr Veh-Mi = [Veh-Mi Supply Pk-Hr Total] - [Veh-Mi Demand Pk-Hr Total] Note: Mileage lengths are shown as rounded to the nearest 0.01. Actual calculations were performed using exact mileage length [Length (ft) / 5,280]. "n/a" are roadways that were not analyzed. Most of these roadways were 2 Lane Collectors or bridges over I-35 included as intersection projects. TOTAL PROJECT COST IN SERVICE AREA SUBTOTAL Intersection Improvements SUBTOTAL City of Georgetown - 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study CIP Service Units of Supply Project ID #ROADWAY LIMITS LANES IMPACT FEE CLASSIFICATION PEAK HOUR VOLUME % IN SERVICE AREA TOTAL PROJECT COST 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown, Texas Appendix B - Transportation Impact Fee CIP Service Units of Suppy PRE-CREDIT DRAFT Page 263 of 276 Service Area E 3/10/2020 VEH-MI VEH-MI VEH-MI EXCESS LENGTH CAPACITY SUPPLY TOTAL CAPACITY (MI)PK-HR PK-HR DEMAND PK-HR PER LN TOTAL1 PK-HR2 VEH-MI3 E-1 Leander Rd Scenic Drive To Fm 1460 0.96 4 Access Management 1,699 100%810 3,096 1,623 1,473 380,000$380,000$ E-2 S Austin Ave 18Th Street To Se Inner Loop 1.38 4 4 Lane Major Arterial 1,282 100%810 4,478 1,772 2,706 2,800,000$2,800,000$ E-3 Fm 1460 (1)Fm 1460 To 2900' S Of Old Fm 1460 0.25 4 Previously Constructed 1,699 100%810 814 427 387 840,213$840,213$ E-4 Fm 1460 (2)2900' S Of Fm 1460 To 4400' S Of Old Fm 1460 0.28 4 Previously Constructed 1,699 100%810 908 476 432 937,088$937,088$ E-5 Fm 1460 (3)200' S Of Se Inner Loop To 4400' S Of Old Fm 1460 0.42 4 Previously Constructed 1,699 100%810 1,353 710 643 1,396,767$1,396,767$ E-6 Fm 1460 (4)200' S Of Se Inner Loop To 1000' S Of Se Inner Loop 0.14 4 Previously Constructed 1,442 100%810 469 209 260 483,740$483,740$ E-7 Fm 1460 (5)1000' S Of Se Inner Loop To 1600' S Of Se Inner Loop 0.11 4 Previously Constructed 1,442 50%810 185 82 103 381,167$190,583$ E-8 Fm 1460 (6)1600' S Of Se Inner Loop To 500' N Of Naturita Dr 0.51 4 Previously Constructed 1,442 100%810 1,662 739 923 1,714,617$1,714,617$ E-9 Fm 1460 (7)500' N Of Naturita Dr To 600' S Of Naturita Dr 0.20 4 Previously Constructed 1,442 100%810 644 287 357 664,826$664,826$ E-10 Fm 1460 (8)600' S Of Naturita Dr To 400' S Of Midnight Ln 0.18 4 Previously Constructed 1,442 50%810 297 132 165 613,539$306,770$ E-11 Fm 1460 (9)400' S Of Midnight Ln To 1000' S Of Midnight Ln 0.09 4 Previously Constructed 1,442 50%810 149 66 83 307,719$153,860$ E-12 Fm 1460 (10)1000' S Of Midnight Ln To Westinghouse Rd 0.31 4 Previously Constructed 1,442 50%810 498 221 277 1,026,997$513,499$ E-13 Fm 1460 (11)Westinghouse Rd To 1800' S Of Westinghouse Rd 0.31 4 Previously Constructed 1,575 100%810 1,008 490 518 1,040,294$1,040,294$ E-14 Se Inner Loop (1)S Austin Ave To 600' W Of S Austin Ave 0.11 4 4 Lane Major Arterial 1,097 100%810 361 122 239 1,700,000$1,700,000$ E-15 Se Inner Loop (2)600' E Of S Austin Ave To 1800' E Of S Austin Ave 0.87 4 4 Lane Major Arterial 1,097 50%810 1,407 476 931 10,900,000$5,450,000$ E-16 Se Inner Loop (3)900' W Of Fm 1460 To Sam Houston Ave 0.57 4 4 Lane Major Arterial 1,276 100%810 1,842 725 1,117 6,300,000$6,300,000$ E-17 Rabbit Hill Rd (2)700' N Of Commerce Blvd To 300' N Of Commerce Blvd 0.06 4 4 Lane Collector 96 50%680 87 3 84 1,200,000$600,000$ E-18 Rabbit Hill Rd (1)300' N Of Commerce Blvd To Westinghouse Rd 0.33 4 4 Lane Collector 96 100%680 893 32 861 2,400,000$2,400,000$ E-19 Westinghouse Rd (1)S Ih 35 To 2000' E Of Mays St 1.10 6 6 Lane Major Arterial 1,254 100%900 5,930 1,377 4,553 13,200,000$13,200,000$ E-20 Westinghouse Rd (2)2000' E Of Mays St To 2500' E Of Mays St 0.09 6 6 Lane Major Arterial 860 50%900 250 40 210 1,900,000$950,000$ E-21 Westinghouse Rd (3)2500' E Of Mays St To 3000' E Of Mays St 0.11 6 6 Lane Major Arterial 860 100%900 609 97 512 2,100,000$2,100,000$ E-22 Westinghouse Rd (4)3600' E Of Mays St To 5800' E Of Mays St 0.40 6 6 Lane Major Arterial 860 50%900 1,092 174 918 5,100,000$2,550,000$ E-23 Westinghouse Rd (5)5800' E Of Mays St To 700' E Of Scenic Lake Dr 0.29 6 6 Lane Major Arterial 860 100%900 1,553 247 1,306 3,900,000$3,900,000$ E-24 Westinghouse Rd (6)700' E Of Scenic Lake Dr To Fm 1460 0.12 6 6 Lane Major Arterial 860 50%900 337 54 283 2,200,000$1,100,000$ E-25 Westinghouse Rd (7)Fm 1460 To Maple Street 0.72 4 4 Lane Major Arterial 390 100%810 2,338 281 2,057 6,600,000$6,600,000$ E-26;F-3 Maple St (1)E 22Nd Street To Brittania Blvd 0.10 4 4 Lane Collector 240 50%680 136 12 124 3,800,000$1,900,000$ E-27;F-4 Maple St (2)Brittania Blvd To Se Inner Loop 0.91 4 4 Lane Collector n/a 50%680 1,238 0 1,238 18,200,000$9,100,000$ E-28;F-5 Maple St (3)Se Inner Loop To Pinnacle Dr 0.78 4 4 Lane Collector 241 50%680 1,066 94 972 4,600,000$2,300,000$ E-29;F-6 Maple St (4)Pinnacle Dr To Westinghouse Rd 0.84 4 4 Lane Collector n/a 50%680 1,137 0 1,137 5,200,000$2,600,000$ 35,837 10,968 24,869 101,886,967$74,172,255$ DI-4;EI-1 Scenic Drive And W 17Th St Roundabout --50%2,000,000$1,000,000$ EI-2 Railroad Ave And 17Th Street Signal 75%500,000$375,000$ EI-3 W 17Th Street And S Austin Ave Signal & Turn Lane 75%640,000$480,000$ EI-4 E 17Th St And S Church St Turn Lane 75%70,000$52,500$ DI-5;EI-5 Leander Rd And Scenic Dr Signal & Turn Lane 50%640,000$320,000$ EI-6 Austin Ave And Leander Rd Turn Lane 75%400,000$300,000$ EI-7 Austin Ave And 21St Street Signal & Turn Lane 75%640,000$480,000$ EI-8 S Main St And W 21St St Signal 75%500,000$375,000$ EI-9 E 21St Street And Industrial Ave Roundabout --75%2,000,000$1,500,000$ EI-10 Industrial Ave And Fm 1460 Signal --50%500,000$250,000$ EI-11 Snead Drive (Blue Springs Rd) And Se Inner Loop Signal --50%500,000$250,000$ EI-12;FI-2 Sam Houston Ave And Maple Street Innovative --50%10,000,000$5,000,000$ EI-13;FI-3 Se Inner Loop And Maple Street Innovative --50%10,000,000$5,000,000$ EI-14 La Conterra Blvd And Fm 1460 Signal 50%500,000$250,000$ EI-15 Westinghouse Rd And Scenic Lake Dr Signal --100%500,000$500,000$ EI-16 Westinghouse Rd And Fm 1460 Turn Lane 75%400,000$300,000$ EI-17 Its System Upgrades Other --17%20,000,000$3,340,000$ 49,790,000$19,772,500$ 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Cost Per Service Area 19,651$ TOTAL COST IN SERVICE AREA C 93,964,406$ 1. Veh-Mi Supply Pk-Hr Total = [Length (mi)] * [Exist Lanes] * [Veh-Mi Capacity Pk-Hr Per Ln] * [% in Service Area] 2. Veh-Mi Demand Pk-Hr Total = [ Length (mi)] * [PM Peak Hour Vol] * [% In Service Area] 3. Excess Capacity Pk-Hr Veh-Mi = [Veh-Mi Supply Pk-Hr Total] - [Veh-Mi Demand Pk-Hr Total] Note: Mileage lengths are shown as rounded to the nearest 0.01. Actual calculations were performed using exact mileage length [Length (ft) / 5,280]. "n/a" are roadways that were not analyzed. Most of these roadways were 2 Lane Collectors or bridges over I-35 included as intersection projects. TOTAL PROJECT COST IN SERVICE AREA SUBTOTAL Intersection Improvements SUBTOTAL City of Georgetown - 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study CIP Service Units of Supply Project ID #ROADWAY LIMITS LANES IMPACT FEE CLASSIFICATION PEAK HOUR VOLUME % IN SERVICE AREA TOTAL PROJECT COST 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown, Texas Appendix B - Transportation Impact Fee CIP Service Units of Suppy PRE-CREDIT DRAFT Page 264 of 276 Service Area F 3/11/2020 VEH-MI VEH-MI VEH-MI EXCESS LENGTH CAPACITY SUPPLY TOTAL CAPACITY (MI)PK-HR PK-HR DEMAND PK-HR PER LN TOTAL1 PK-HR2 VEH-MI3 C-8;F-1 E Sh 29 (1) Haven Street To 300' E Of Reinhardt Blvd 1.32 4 4 Lane Major Arterial 1,348 50%810 2,139 890 1,249 3,020,000$1,510,000$ C-10;F-2 E Sh 29 (2)300' E Of Owen Cir To Sh 130 0.08 4 Access Management 1,348 50%810 133 55 78 180,000$90,000$ E-26;F-3 Maple St (1)E 22Nd Street To Brittania Blvd 0.10 4 4 Lane Collector 240 50%680 136 12 124 3,800,000$1,900,000$ E-27;F-4 Maple St (2)Brittania Blvd To Se Inner Loop 0.91 4 4 Lane Collector n/a 50%680 1,238 0 1,238 18,200,000$9,100,000$ E-28;F-5 Maple St (3)Se Inner Loop To Pinnacle Dr 0.78 4 4 Lane Collector 241 50%680 1,066 94 972 4,600,000$2,300,000$ E-29;F-6 Maple St (4)Pinnacle Dr To Westinghouse Rd 0.84 4 4 Lane Collector 241 50%680 1,137 101 1,036 5,200,000$2,600,000$ F-7 Se Inner Loop (1)University Ave To Rockride Ln 1.19 4 4 Lane Minor Arterial 725 100%510 2,437 866 1,571 8,800,000$8,800,000$ F-8 Se Inner Loop (2)Rockride Ln To Southwestern Blvd 0.27 4 4 Lane Minor Arterial 313 50%510 272 42 230 3,000,000$1,500,000$ F-9 Se Inner Loop (3)Southwestern Blvd To Maple Street 0.77 4 4 Lane Minor Arterial 1,045 100%510 1,564 801 763 5,800,000$5,800,000$ F-10 Southwestern Blvd (1)Raintree Dr To 1500' S Of Raintree Dr 0.28 4 4 Lane Minor Arterial 550 100%510 579 156 423 2,700,000$2,700,000$ F-11 Southwestern Blvd (2)1500' S Of Raintree Dr To Se Inner Loop 0.25 4 4 Lane Minor Arterial 550 50%510 258 70 188 2,400,000$1,200,000$ F-12 Southwestern Blvd (3)Se Inner Loop To Sam Houston Ave 0.66 4 4 Lane Major Arterial 550 100%810 2,136 363 1,773 6,100,000$6,100,000$ F-13 Southwestern Blvd (4)Sam Houston Ave To Fairhaven Gtwy 0.60 4 4 Lane Major Arterial 550 100%810 1,930 328 1,602 5,600,000$5,600,000$ F-14 Southwestern Blvd (5)Fairhaven Gtwy To Westinghouse Rd 0.71 4 4 Lane Major Arterial 244 100%810 2,286 172 2,114 6,500,000$6,500,000$ F-15 Rockride Ln (1)Se Inner Loop To Sam Houston Ave 0.76 4 4 Lane Collector 908 100%680 2,066 690 1,376 4,500,000$4,500,000$ F-16 Rockride Ln (2)Sam Houston Ave To 2200' S Of Sam Houston Ave 0.41 4 4 Lane Collector 277 50%680 552 56 496 3,100,000$1,550,000$ F-17 Rockride Ln (3)2200' S Of Sam Houston Ave To 2700' S Of Sam Houston Ave 0.09 4 4 Lane Collector 277 100%680 247 25 222 1,300,000$1,300,000$ F-18 Carlson Cove 1900' E Of Rock Ride Ln To Sam Houston Ave 1.01 4 4 Lane Minor Arterial n/a 100%510 2,058 0 2,058 7,300,000$7,300,000$ F-19 Patriot Way (1)Sh 130 Frontage To Sam Houston Ave 0.45 4 4 Lane Major Arterial n/a 100%810 1,463 0 1,463 4,800,000$4,800,000$ F-20 Sam Houston (1)Southwestern Blvd To Patriot Way 1.77 4 4 Lane Major Arterial 330 100%810 5,736 584 5,152 16,200,000$16,200,000$ F-21 Sam Houston (2)Patriot Way To 2900' E Of Sh 130 Nb 1.15 2 2 Lane Major Arterial n/a 100%680 1,562 0 1,562 5,700,000$5,700,000$ F-22 Bell Gin Rd Sam Houston Ave To Westinghouse Rd 1.56 4 4 Lane Minor Arterial 186 50%510 1,590 145 1,445 13,700,000$6,850,000$ F-23 Westinghouse Rd Maple St To Bell Gin Rd 1.83 4 4 Lane Major Arterial 360 50%810 2,961 329 2,632 15,700,000$7,850,000$ 35,546 5,779 29,767 148,200,000$111,750,000$ CI-10;FI-1 E University Ave And Hutto Rd Turn Lane --50%400,000$200,000$ EI-12;FI-2 Sam Houston Ave And Maple Street Innovative 50%10,000,000$5,000,000$ EI-13;FI-3 Se Inner Loop And Maple Street Innovative 50%10,000,000$5,000,000$ FI-4 Southwestern Blvd And Se Inner Loop Signal & Turn Lane 75%640,000$480,000$ FI-5 Rock Ride Lane And Se Inner Loop Signal 50%500,000$250,000$ FI-6 Sh130 And Patriot Way Signal 100%500,000$500,000$ FI-7 Sam Houston Ave And Southwestern Blvd Signal 100%500,000$500,000$ FI-8 Sam Houston Ave And Rock Ride Ln Signal & Turn Lane 100%640,000$640,000$ FI-9 Its System Upgrade Signal & Turn Lane 17%20,000,000$3,340,000$ 43,180,000$15,910,000$ 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Cost Per Service Area 19,651$ TOTAL COST IN SERVICE AREA F 127,679,651$ 1. Veh-Mi Supply Pk-Hr Total = [Length (mi)] * [Exist Lanes] * [Veh-Mi Capacity Pk-Hr Per Ln] * [% in Service Area] 2. Veh-Mi Demand Pk-Hr Total = [ Length (mi)] * [PM Peak Hour Vol] * [% In Service Area] 3. Excess Capacity Pk-Hr Veh-Mi = [Veh-Mi Supply Pk-Hr Total] - [Veh-Mi Demand Pk-Hr Total] Note: Mileage lengths are shown as rounded to the nearest 0.01. Actual calculations were performed using exact mileage length [Length (ft) / 5,280]. "n/a" are roadways that were not analyzed. Most of these roadways were 2 Lane Collectors or bridges over I-35 included as intersection projects. TOTAL PROJECT COST IN SERVICE AREA SUBTOTAL Intersection Improvements SUBTOTAL City of Georgetown - 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study CIP Service Units of Supply Project ID #ROADWAY LIMITS LANES IMPACT FEE CLASSIFICATION PEAK HOUR VOLUME % IN SERVICE AREA TOTAL PROJECT COST 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown, Texas Appendix B - Transportation Impact Fee CIP Service Units of Suppy PRE-CREDIT DRAFT Page 265 of 276 Service Area SC 3/10/2020 VEH-MI VEH-MI VEH-MI EXCESS LENGTH CAPACITY SUPPLY TOTAL CAPACITY (MI)PK-HR PK-HR DEMAND PK-HR PER LN TOTAL1 PK-HR2 VEH-MI3 SC-1 Ronald W Reagan Blvd (1)Somerset Hills To 700' W Of Cr 245 0.50 4 4 Lane Major Arterial 800 50%810 808 200 608 4,300,000$2,150,000$ SC-2 Ronald W Reagan Blvd (2)700' W Of Cr 245 To 1100' E Of Silver Spur Blvd 1.58 4 4 Lane Major Arterial 800 100%810 5,112 1,262 3,850 12,100,000$12,100,000.00$ SC-3 Ronald W Reagan Blvd (3)1100' E Of Silver Spur Blvd To 3000' E Of Silver Spur Blvd 0.35 4 4 Lane Major Arterial 800 50%810 571 141 430 3,200,000$1,600,000$ SC-4 Ronald W Reagan Blvd (4)600' W Of Ridgetop Vista Dr To Ridgetop Vista Dr 0.11 4 4 Lane Major Arterial 800 100%810 353 87 266 1,600,000$1,600,000$ SC-5 Ronald W Reagan Blvd (5)Ridgetop Vista Dr To 400' E Of Sun City Blvd 0.38 4 4 Lane Major Arterial 800 50%810 615 152 463 4,400,000$2,200,000$ SC-6 Ronald W Reagan Blvd (6)400' E Of Sun City Blvd To Telegraph Ln 0.26 4 4 Lane Major Arterial 800 100%810 827 204 623 5,600,000$5,600,000$ SC-7 Ronald W Reagan Blvd (7)Telegraph Ln To 4000' E Of Telegraph Ln 0.74 4 4 Lane Major Arterial 800 50%810 1,195 295 900 5,900,000$2,950,000$ SC-8 Cr 245 (1)Ronald W Reagan Blvd To 1400' S Of Ronald W Reagan Blvd 0.25 2 3 Lane Collector 800 100%570 287 201 86 800,000$800,000$ SC-9 Cr 245 (2)1400' S Of Ronald W Reagan Blvd To 2300' S Of Ronald W Reagan Blvd0.16 2 3 Lane Collector 800 50%570 91 64 27 2,900,000$1,450,000$ SC-10 Cr 245 (3)1200' N Of Rocky Hollow Creek Dr To Rm 2338 0.47 2 3 Lane Collector 800 50%570 269 189 80 1,500,000$750,000$ SC-11 Rm 2338 (1)3000' E Of Indian Springs Rd To 7000' E Of Indian Springs Rd 0.71 4 Access Management 800 50%810 1,153 285 868 260,000$130,000$ SC-12 Rm 2338 (2)350' S Of Cr 245 To W Ridgewood Rd 0.36 4 Access Management 800 50%810 582 144 438 274,650$137,325$ SC-13 Williams Dr 800' E Of Highland Spring Ln To 500' S Of Casaloma Cir 0.99 4 Access Management 1,776 50%810 1,611 883 728 1,500,000$750,000$ 13,474 4,107 9,367 44,334,650$32,217,325$ SCI-1 Ronald Reagan Blvd And Cr 245 Signal --100%500,000$500,000$ SCI-2 Ronald W Reagan Blvd And Sun City Blvd Signal --50%500,000$250,000$ SCI-3 Cr 245 And Williams Dr Signal --25%500,000$125,000$ SCI-4 Williams Drive And Jim Hogg Road Turn Lane --100%140,000$140,000$ SCI-5 Williams Drive And Del Webb Blvd Turn Lane sup -50%70,000$35,000$ SCI-6 Del Webb Blvd And Whispering Wind Turn Lane --100%70,000$70,000$ SCI-7 Del Webb Blvd And Sun City Blvd Signal & Turn Lane --100%570,000$570,000$ SCI-8 Sun City Blvd And Sh 195 Turn Lane --50%140,000$70,000$ SCI-9 Its Upgrades Other --17%20,000,000$3,340,000$ 22,490,000$5,100,000$ 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Cost Per Service Area 19,651$ TOTAL COST IN SERVICE AREA A 37,336,976$ 1. Veh-Mi Supply Pk-Hr Total = [Length (mi)] * [Exist Lanes] * [Veh-Mi Capacity Pk-Hr Per Ln] * [% in Service Area] 2. Veh-Mi Demand Pk-Hr Total = [ Length (mi)] * [PM Peak Hour Vol] * [% In Service Area] 3. Excess Capacity Pk-Hr Veh-Mi = [Veh-Mi Supply Pk-Hr Total] - [Veh-Mi Demand Pk-Hr Total] Note: Mileage lengths are shown as rounded to the nearest 0.01. Actual calculations were performed using exact mileage length [Length (ft) / 5,280]. "n/a" are roadways that were not analyzed. Most of these roadways were 2 Lane Collectors or bridges over I-35 included as intersection projects. TOTAL PROJECT COST IN SERVICE AREA SUBTOTAL City of Georgetown - 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study CIP Service Units of Supply Project ID #ROADWAY LIMITS LANES IMPACT FEE CLASSIFICATION PEAK HOUR VOLUME % IN SERVICE AREA TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL Intersection Improvements 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown, Texas Appendix B - Transportation Impact Fee CIP Service Units of Suppy PRE-CREDIT DRAFT Page 266 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT C Appendix C – Existing Facilities Inventory Page 267 of 276 Service Area A 3/11/2020 % IN ROADWAY FROM TO LENGTH LENGTH EXIST CLASS FUTURE SERVICE (ft)(mi)XS LANES AREA NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB SHELL RD (1)600' S Of Sh 195 400' N Of Shell Stone Trl 590 0.11 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4D 406 380 50%410 410 23 23 23 21 0 2 SHELL RD (2)1200' S Of Sh 195 200' S Of Shell Stone Trl 495 0 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4D 406 380 1 410 410 38 38 38 36 0 3 SHELL RD (3)200' S Of Shell Stone Trl Scenic Oaks Dr 602 0 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4D 406 380 1 410 410 23 23 23 22 0 2 SHELL RD (4)Shell Spur Scenic Oaks Dr 2,015 0 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4D 406 380 1 410 410 156 156 155 145 2 11 SHELL RD (5)2000' S Of Scenic Oaks Dr 5000' S Of Scenic Oaks Dr 2,301 0 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4D 406 380 1 410 410 89 89 88 83 1 7 SHELL RD (6)4315' S Of Scenic Oaks Dr 4790' S Of Scenic Oaks Dr 475 0 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4D 406 380 1 410 410 37 37 37 34 0 3 SHELL RD (7)4790' S Of Scenic Oaks Dr 5170' S Of Scenic Oaks Dr 480 0 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4D 406 380 1 410 410 19 19 18 17 0 1 SHELL RD (8)1870' S Of Shell Spur 5170' S Of Scenic Oaks Dr 3,727 1 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4D 406 380 1 410 410 289 289 287 268 3 21 SHELL RD (9)900' S Of Bowline Dr 300' N Of Sycanire St 2,799 1 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4D 640 380 1 410 410 109 109 170 101 -61 8 61 BERRY CREEK DR Airport Rd Sh 195 3,709 1 1 1 2U 4 Lane Minor Arterial 4D 217 207 1 410 410 288 288 152 145 136 143 AIRPORT RD (1)Berry Creek Dr Indian Mound Rd 560 0 1 1 2U 4 Lane Minor Arterial 4D 217 207 1 410 410 43 43 23 22 20 22 AIRPORT RD (2)Indian Mound Rd 500' N Of Sanaloma Dr 3,630 1 1 1 2U 4 Lane Minor Arterial 4D 217 207 1 410 410 141 141 75 71 66 70 AIRPORT RD (3)Cavu Rd 300' S Of Vortac Ln 1,299 0 1 1 2U 4 Lane Minor Arterial 4D 217 207 1 410 410 50 50 27 25 24 25 AIRPORT RD (4)Halmar Cove Lakeway Dr 2,816 1 2 2 2U 4 Lane Minor Arterial 4D 217 207 1 410 410 437 437 116 110 322 327 AIRPORT RD (4)300' S Of Vortac Ln Halmar Cove 1,694 0 1 1 2U 4 Lane Minor Arterial 4D 217 207 1 410 410 132 132 70 66 62 65 AIRPORT RD (4)Halmar Cove Lakeway Dr 522 0 1 1 2U 4 Lane Minor Arterial 4D 217 207 1 410 410 41 41 21 20 19 20 LAKEWAY DR Northwest Blvd Airport Rd 5,949 1 1 1 2U 4 Lane Collector 4D 277 390 1 410 410 462 462 312 439 150 23 SHELL RD (10)500' N Of Bowline Dr 900' S Of Bowline Dr 1,341 0 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4D 640 380 1 410 410 52 52 81 48 -29 4 29 SHELL RD (10)900' S Of Bowline Dr 200' N Of Sycanire St 539 0 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4D 640 380 1 410 410 21 21 33 19 -12 2 12 SHELL RD (11)300' N Of Sycanire St Bellaire Dr 759 0 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4D 640 380 1 410 410 59 59 92 55 -33 4 33 SHELL RD (12)Bellaire Dr Verde Vista 3,151 1 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4D 640 385 1 410 410 245 245 382 230 -137 15 137 SHELL RD (12)300' N Of Sycanire St Bellaire Dr 632 0 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4D 640 385 1 410 410 49 49 77 46 -28 3 28 SHELL RD (13)Verde Vista Williams Dr 1,396 0 1 1 2U 4 Lane Collector 4D 640 385 1 410 410 108 108 169 102 -61 7 61 VERDE VISTA Williams Dr 1500' E Of Williams Dr 1,478 0 0 0 2u 4 Lane Collector 4D n/a n/a 1 410 410 0 0 WILDWOOD DR Verde Vista Dr Williams Dr 1,645 0 1 1 2U 3 Lane Collector 3U 141 26 1 410 410 128 128 44 8 84 120 WILLIAMS DR (2)D B Wood 1200' E Of Country Rd 2,913 1 2 2 4D Access Management 4D 1126 1166 1 810 810 447 447 311 322 136 125 WILLIAMS DR (2)400' N Of Bettie Mae Way Verde Vista 4,424 1 2 2 4D Access Management 4D 908 1540 1 810 810 679 679 380 645 298 34 WILLIAMS DR (2)Verde Vista Wildwood 2,122 0 2 2 4D Access Management 4D 1142 1540 1 810 810 326 326 230 310 96 16 WILLIAMS DR (2)Wildwood D B Wood 1,337 0 2 2 4D Access Management 4D 1142 1390 1 810 810 205 205 145 176 61 29 WILLIAMS DR (3)1200' E Of Country Rd Country Rd 1,183 0 2 2 4D Access Management 4D 1126 1166 1 810 810 181 181 126 131 55 51 WILLIAMS DR (4)Golden Oaks Dr Rivery Blvd 2,060 0 2 2 4D Access Management 4D 1691 1441 1 810 810 316 316 330 281 -14 35 14 WILLIAMS DR (4)Serenada Dr Lakeway Dr 4,058 1 2 2 4D Access Management 4D 1708 1586 1 810 810 622 622 656 609 -34 13 34 WILLIAMS DR (4)Lakeway Dr River Bend Dr 1,819 0 2 2 4D Access Management 4D 1901 1416 1 810 810 279 279 328 244 -48 35 48 WILLIAMS DR (4)Rivery Blvd S Ih 35 Sb 1,754 0 2 2 4D Access Management 4D 1228 1302 1 810 810 269 269 204 216 65 53 WILLIAMS DR (4)River Bend Dr Golden Oaks Dr 909 0 2 2 4D Access Management 4D 1956 1464 1 810 810 139 139 168 126 -29 13 29 WILLIAMS DR (4)4500' N Of Verde Vista Verde Vista 2,099 0 2 2 4D Access Management 4D 1427 1578 1 810 810 322 322 284 314 38 8 LAKEWAY DR Whisper Oaks Ln Williams Dr 2,022 0 1 1 2U 3 Lane Collector 3U 1024 122 1 410 410 157 157 392 47 -235 110 235 RIVERY BLVD Northwest Blvd Williams Drive 2,628 0 1 1 2u 4 Lane Minor Arterial 4D n/a n/a 1 410 410 204 204 RIVERY BLVD Wildwood Dr Shell Rd 171 0 1 1 2U 4 Lane Collector 4D n/a n/a 1 410 410 13 13 SUBTOTAL 74,103 11.11 5,194 5,194 4,033 3,999 1,161 1,194 375 0 1. Veh-Mi Supply Pk-Hr Total = [Length (mi)] * [Exist Lanes] * [Veh-Mi Capacity Pk-Hr Per Ln] * [% in Service Area] 2. Veh-Mi Demand Pk-Hr Total = [ Length (mi)] * [PM Peak Hour Vol] * [% In Service Area] 3. Excess Capacity Pk-Hr Veh-Mi = [Veh-Mi Supply Pk-Hr Total] - [Veh-Mi Demand Pk-Hr Total] 4. Existing Deficiencies Pk-Hr Veh-Mi = [Veh-Mi Demand Pk-Hr Total] - [Veh-Mi Supply Pk-Hr Total] Note: Mileage lengths are shown as rounded to the nearest 0.01. Actual calculations were performed using exact mileage length [Length (ft) / 5,280]. "n/a" are roadways that were not analyzed. Most of these roadways were 2 Lane Collectors or bridges over I-35 included as intersection projects. 10,388 8,032 2,355 375 PK-HR VOL PER LN TOTAL1 TOTAL2 VEH-MI3 VEH-MI4 HOUR PK-HR PK-HR PK-HR PK-HR City of Georgetown - 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory EXIST LANES PM VEH-MI VEH-MI VEH-MI EXCESS EXISTING PEAK CAPACITY SUPPLY DEMAND CAPACITY DEFICIENCIES 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown, Texas Appendix C - Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory PRE-CREDIT DRAFT Page 268 of 276 Service Area B 3/10/2020 % IN ROADWAY FROM TO LENGTH LENGTH EXIST CLASS FUTURE SERVICE (ft)(mi)XS LANES AREA NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB WILLIAMS DR (2)D B Wood 1200' E Of Country Rd 2,913 0.55 2 2 4D Access Management 4D 1,126 1,166 50%810 810 447 447 311 322 136 125 WILLIAMS DR (2)400' N Of Bettie Mae Way Verde Vista 4,424 0.84 2 2 4D Access Management 4D 908 1,540 50%810 810 679 679 380 645 298 34 WILLIAMS DR (2)Verde Vista Wildwood 2,122 0.40 2 2 4D Access Management 4D 1,142 1,540 50%810 810 326 326 230 310 96 16 WILLIAMS DR (2)Wildwood D B Wood 1,337 0.25 2 2 4D Access Management 4D 1,142 1,390 50%810 810 205 205 145 176 61 29 WILLIAMS DR (3)1200' E Of Country Rd Country Rd 1,183 0.22 2 2 4D Access Management 4D 1,126 1,166 50%810 810 181 181 126 131 55 51 WILLIAMS DR (4)Golden Oaks Dr Rivery Blvd 2,060 0.39 2 2 4D Access Management 4D 1,691 1,441 50%810 810 316 316 330 281 -14 35 14 WILLIAMS DR (4)Serenada Dr Lakeway Dr 4,058 0.77 2 2 4D Access Management 4D 1,708 1,586 50%810 810 622 622 656 609 -34 13 34 WILLIAMS DR (4)Lakeway Dr River Bend Dr 1,819 0.34 2 2 4D Access Management 4D 1,901 1,416 50%810 810 279 279 328 244 -48 35 48 WILLIAMS DR (4)Rivery Blvd S Ih 35 Sb 1,754 0.33 2 2 4D Access Management 4D 1,228 1,302 50%810 810 269 269 204 216 65 53 WILLIAMS DR (4)River Bend Dr Golden Oaks Dr 909 0.17 2 2 4D Access Management 4D 1,956 1,464 50%810 810 139 139 168 126 -29 13 29 WILLIAMS DR (4)4500' N Of Verde Vista Verde Vista 2,099 0.40 2 2 4D Access Management 4D 1,427 1,578 50%810 810 322 322 284 314 38 8 D B WOOD RD (1)Williams Dr 1300' S Of Williams Dr 1,274 0.24 2 2 4D 4 Lane Major Arterial 4D 424 684 100%810 810 391 391 102 165 289 226 D B WOOD RD (2)1300' S Of Williams Dr 2700' S Of Williams Dr 1,393 0.26 2 2 2U Access Management 4D 424 684 50%410 410 108 108 56 90 52 18 D B WOOD RD (3)2700' S Of Williams Dr Cedar Breaks Rd 6,810 1.29 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4D 424 684 50%410 410 264 264 273 441 -9 -177 9 177 D B WOOD RD (4)Mason Ranch Dr 2200' S Of Mason Ranch Dr 2,201 0.42 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4D 424 684 100%410 410 171 171 177 285 -6 -114 6 114 D B WOOD RD (4)Cedar Breaks Rd Oakridge Rd 2,308 0.44 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4D 424 684 100%410 410 179 179 185 299 -6 -120 6 120 D B WOOD RD (4)Oakridge Rd 1800' S Of Oakridge Rd 1,756 0.33 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4D 424 684 100%410 410 136 136 141 227 -5 -91 5 91 D B WOOD RD (4)2200' S Of Mason Ranch DrW University Ave 2,010 0.38 1 1 3U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4D 424 684 100%510 510 194 194 161 260 33 -66 66 D B WOOD RD (4)1300' S Of Williams Dr Mason Ranch Dr 1,694 0.32 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4D 424 684 100%410 410 132 132 136 219 -4 -88 4 88 COUNTRY RD Williams Dr 500' S Of Rustle Cv 2,036 0.39 1 1 2U 3 Lane Collector 3U n/a n/a 50%410 410 79 79 BOOTYS CROSSING RD 400' W Of Pecan Ln Williams Dr 5,848 1.11 1 1 2U 3 Lane Collector 3U 513 476 100%410 410 454 454 568 527 -114 -73 114 73 WOLF RANCH PKWY Rivery Blvd 300' N Of Memorial Drive 7,080 1.34 1 1 3U 4 Lane Collector 4D 158 100 100%510 510 684 684 212 134 472 550 WOLF RANCH PKWY 300' N Of Memorial Drive Sh 29 256 0.05 1 1 3U 4 Lane Collector 4D 158 100 100%510 510 25 25 8 5 17 20 MEMORIAL DRIVE (1)Rivr Chase Blvd Wolf Ranch Pkwy 2,068 0.39 1 1 2U 3 Lane Collector 3U n/a n/a 100%410 410 161 161 MEMORIAL DRIVE (2)Wolf Ranch Pkwy Wolf Lakes Dr 1,537 0.29 1 1 2U 4 Lane Collector 4D n/a n/a 100%410 410 119 119 W SH 29 (3)D B Wood Rd River Chase Blvd 1,141 0.22 2 2 5U 6 Lane Major Arterial 6D 158 729 50%770 770 166 166 17 79 149 88 W SH 29 (3)Wood Ct D B Wood Rd 793 0.15 2 2 5U 6 Lane Major Arterial 6D 729 658 50%770 770 116 116 55 49 61 66 W SH 29 (3)River Chase Blvd 900' E Of River Chase Blvd 820 0.16 2 2 5U 6 Lane Major Arterial 6D 158 729 50%770 770 120 120 12 57 107 63 W SH 29 (3)900' E Of River Chase BlvdWolf Ranch Pkwy 1,210 0.23 2 2 4D 6 Lane Major Arterial 6D 158 729 50%810 810 186 186 18 84 168 102 W UNIVERSITY AVE S Ih 35 Sb Scenic Dr 2,729 0.52 2 2 5U 6 Lane Major Arterial 6D 158 729 50%770 770 398 398 41 188 357 210 W UNIVERSITY AVE Wolf Ranch Pkwy S Ih 35 Sb 2,403 0.46 2 2 4D 6 Lane Major Arterial 6D 158 729 50%810 810 369 369 36 166 333 203 SUBTOTAL 72,043 13.64 8,237 8,237 5,360 6,650 2,518 1,228 269 729 1. Veh-Mi Supply Pk-Hr Total = [Length (mi)] * [Exist Lanes] * [Veh-Mi Capacity Pk-Hr Per Ln] * [% in Service Area] 2. Veh-Mi Demand Pk-Hr Total = [ Length (mi)] * [PM Peak Hour Vol] * [% In Service Area] 3. Excess Capacity Pk-Hr Veh-Mi = [Veh-Mi Supply Pk-Hr Total] - [Veh-Mi Demand Pk-Hr Total] 4. Existing Deficiencies Pk-Hr Veh-Mi = [Veh-Mi Demand Pk-Hr Total] - [Veh-Mi Supply Pk-Hr Total] Note: Mileage lengths are shown as rounded to the nearest 0.01. Actual calculations were performed using exact mileage length [Length (ft) / 5,280]. "n/a" are roadways that were not analyzed. Most of these roadways were 2 Lane Collectors or bridges over I-35 included as intersection projects. EXISTING EXIST LANES HOUR PK-HR PK-HR PK-HR SUPPLY DEMAND 16,474 12,009 3,746 998 PK-HR PK-HR VEH-MI4TOTAL1TOTAL2VEH-MI3 City of Georgetown - 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory CAPACITY DEFICIENCIESCAPACITY VOL PER LN PEAK PM VEH-MI VEH-MI VEH-MI EXCESS 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown, Texas Appendix C - Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory PRE-CREDIT DRAFT Page 269 of 276 Service Area C 3/10/2020 % IN ROADWAY FROM TO LENGTH LENGTH EXIST CLASS FUTURE SERVICE (ft)(mi)XS LANES AREA NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NE INNER LOOP Fm 971 4000' S Of Fm 971 3,981 0.75 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4U 254 625 100%410 410 309 309 191 471 118 -162 162 NE INNER LOOP Ih 35 Nb N Austin Ave 361 0.07 1 1 3U 4 Lane Minor Arterial 4U 321 358 100%510 510 35 35 22 24 13 10 NE INNER LOOP Gabriels Bluff Dr 1500' S Of Gabriels Bluff Dr 1,488 0.28 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4U 254 625 100%410 410 116 116 72 176 44 -61 61 NE INNER LOOP 1500' S Of Gabriels Bluff DrUniversity Ave 797 0.15 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4U 254 625 100%410 410 62 62 38 94 24 -32 32 NE INNER LOOP 5100' S Of Fm 971 Gabriels Bluff Dr 3,141 0.59 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4U 254 625 100%410 410 244 244 151 372 93 -128 128 NE INNER LOOP 4000' S Of Fm 971 5100' S Of Fm 971 1,069 0.20 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4U 254 625 100%410 410 83 83 51 127 32 -44 44 NE INNER LOOP N Austin Ave Stadium Drive 2,336 0.44 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4U 321 358 100%410 410 181 181 142 158 39 23 NE INNER LOOP Stadium Drive Fm 971 3,302 0.63 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4U 321 358 100%410 410 256 256 201 224 56 33 STADIUM DRIVE N Austin Ave Ne Inner Loop 2,582 0.49 1 1 2U 4 Lane Minor Arterial 4D 400 250 100%410 410 201 201 196 122 5 78 STADIUM DRIVE 100' E Of Crystal Knoll Blvd400' W Of Klein Ct 1,464 0.28 1 1 2U 4 Lane Minor Arterial 4U 400 250 50%410 410 57 57 55 35 1 22 N AUSTIN AVE Old Airport Rd Williams Drive 2,604 0.49 2 2 5U Access Management 4D 757 763 100%770 770 759 759 373 376 386 383 N AUSTIN AVE Ne Inner Loop Cr 151 2,555 0.48 2 2 5U Access Management 4D 403 553 100%770 770 745 745 195 268 550 478 N AUSTIN AVE Cr 151 Old Airport Rd 2,766 0.52 2 2 5U Access Management 4D 403 553 100%770 770 807 807 211 290 596 517 N AUSTIN AVE Old Airport Rd Williams Drive 2,242 0.42 2 2 5U Access Management 4D 403 553 100%770 770 654 654 171 235 483 419 NORTHWEST BLVD N Ih 35 Fwy Sb N Austin Ave 1,172 0.22 0 0 2u 4 Lane Major Arterial 4D n/a n/a 100%410 410 0 0 FM 971 (1)Gains St E Morrow St 1,944 0.37 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4D 440 283 100%410 410 151 151 162 104 -11 47 11 FM 971 (1)N Austin Ave Gains St 1,400 0.27 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4D 440 283 100%410 410 109 109 117 75 -8 34 8 FM 971 (2)E Morrow St Ne Inner Loop 4,211 0.80 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4U 440 283 100%410 410 327 327 351 226 -24 101 24 FM 971 (2)Ne Inner Loop Sh 130 Sb 2,431 0.46 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4U 437 305 100%410 410 189 189 201 140 -12 48 12 E SH 29 (1)800' E Of Haven Street Smith Creek Rd 2,533 0.48 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4U 621 727 50%410 410 98 98 149 174 -51 -76 51 76 E SH 29 (1)Smith Creek Rd Ne Inner Loop 2,402 0.45 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4U 621 727 50%410 410 93 93 141 165 -48 -72 48 72 E SH 29 (1)Haven Street 800' E Of Haven Street 747 0.14 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4U 740 628 50%410 410 29 29 52 44 -23 -15 23 15 E SH 29 (1)Ne Inner Loop 300' E Of Reinhardt Blvd 1,288 0.24 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4U 621 727 50%410 410 50 50 76 89 -26 -39 26 39 E SH 29 (2)Haven Street Raindance Drive 1,399 0.26 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4U 621 727 50%410 410 54 54 82 96 -28 -42 28 42 E SH 29 (2)Raindance Drive Berry Lane 817 0.15 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4U 621 727 50%410 410 32 32 48 56 -16 -25 16 25 E SH 29 (3)Berry Lane Sh 130 432 0.08 1 1 2U Access Management 4D 621 727 50%410 410 17 17 25 30 -9 -13 9 13 SUBTOTAL 51,464 9.67 5,641 5,641 3,450 4,143 2,191 1,498 247 696 1. Veh-Mi Supply Pk-Hr Total = [Length (mi)] * [Exist Lanes] * [Veh-Mi Capacity Pk-Hr Per Ln] * [% in Service Area] 2. Veh-Mi Demand Pk-Hr Total = [ Length (mi)] * [PM Peak Hour Vol] * [% In Service Area] 3. Excess Capacity Pk-Hr Veh-Mi = [Veh-Mi Supply Pk-Hr Total] - [Veh-Mi Demand Pk-Hr Total] 4. Existing Deficiencies Pk-Hr Veh-Mi = [Veh-Mi Demand Pk-Hr Total] - [Veh-Mi Supply Pk-Hr Total] Note: Mileage lengths are shown as rounded to the nearest 0.01. Actual calculations were performed using exact mileage length [Length (ft) / 5,280]. "n/a" are roadways that were not analyzed. Most of these roadways were 2 Lane Collectors or bridges over I-35 included as intersection projects. City of Georgetown - 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory EXIST LANES PM VEH-MI VEH-MI VEH-MI EXCESS EXISTING PEAK CAPACITY SUPPLY DEMAND CAPACITY DEFICIENCIES VOL PER LN TOTAL1 TOTAL2 VEH-MI3 VEH-MI4 HOUR PK-HR PK-HR PK-HR PK-HR 11,282 7,593 3,689 943 PK-HR 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown, Texas Appendix C - Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory PRE-CREDIT DRAFT Page 270 of 276 Service Area D 3/10/2020 % IN ROADWAY FROM TO LENGTH LENGTH EXIST CLASS FUTURE SERVICE (ft)(mi)XS LANES AREA NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB W SH 29 (1)2500' E Of Gabriel Forest 300' E Of Rio Bravo Rd 2,313 0.44 2 2 5U 6 Lane Major Arterial 6D 729 658 100%770 770 675 675 319 288 355 386 W SH 29 (1)300' E Of Rio Bravo Rd 1000' E Of Wood Ranch Rd 5,427 1.03 2 2 5U 6 Lane Major Arterial 6D 729 658 100%770 770 1,583 1,583 749 676 834 906 W SH 29 (2)1000' E Of Wood Ranch RdLegend Oak Dr 864 0.16 2 2 5U 6 Lane Major Arterial 6D 729 658 50%770 770 126 126 60 54 66 72 W SH 29 (2)Legend Oaks Dr Wood Ct 457 0.09 2 2 5U 6 Lane Major Arterial 6D 729 658 50%770 770 67 67 32 28 35 38 W SH 29 (3)D B Wood Rd River Chase Blvd 1,141 0.22 2 2 5U 6 Lane Major Arterial 6D 158 729 50%770 770 166 166 17 79 149 88 W SH 29 (3)Wood Ct D B Wood Rd 793 0.15 2 2 5U 6 Lane Major Arterial 6D 729 658 50%770 770 116 116 55 49 61 66 W SH 29 (3)River Chase Blvd 900' E Of River Chase Blvd 820 0.16 2 2 5U 6 Lane Major Arterial 6D 158 729 50%770 770 120 120 12 57 107 63 W SH 29 (3)900' E Of River Chase BlvdWolf Ranch Pkwy 1,210 0.23 2 2 4D 6 Lane Major Arterial 6D 158 729 50%810 810 186 186 18 84 168 102 W UNIVERSITY AVE S Ih 35 Sb Scenic Dr 2,729 0.52 2 2 5U 6 Lane Major Arterial 6D 158 729 100%770 770 796 796 82 377 714 419 W UNIVERSITY AVE Wolf Ranch Pkwy S Ih 35 Sb 2,403 0.46 2 2 4D 6 Lane Major Arterial 6D 158 729 100%810 810 737 737 72 332 665 405 D B WOOD RD University Ave 800' S Of University Ave 729 0.14 1 1 2U 4 Lane Minor Arterial 4D 424 684 100%410 410 57 57 59 94 -2 -38 2 38 D B WOOD RD Sh 29 Bypass Wolf Ranch Pkwy 752 0.14 1 1 2D 4 Lane Minor Arterial 4D 424 684 100%550 550 78 78 60 97 18 -19 19 WOLF RANCH PKWY D B Wood Rd Southwest Byp 4,002 0.76 1 1 2D 4 Lane Minor Arterial 4D 158 100 100%550 550 417 417 120 76 297 341 WOLF RANCH PKWY 1500' S Of University Blvd D B Wood Rd 1,940 0.37 1 1 2U 4 Lane Minor Arterial 4D 158 100 100%410 410 151 151 58 37 93 114 WOLF RANCH PKWY University Blvd 300' S Of University Blvd 290 0.05 1 1 2D 4 Lane Minor Arterial 4D 158 100 100%550 550 30 30 9 5 22 25 WOLF RANCH PKWY 700' S Of University Blvd 1500' S Of University Blvd 812 0.15 1 1 2U 4 Lane Minor Arterial 4D 158 100 100%410 410 63 63 24 15 39 48 WOLF RANCH PKWY 300' S Of University Blvd 700' S Of University Blvd 356 0.07 1 1 2D 4 Lane Minor Arterial 4D 158 100 50%550 550 19 19 5 3 13 15 SOUTHWEST BYPASS (1)D B Wood Rd 3400' S Of Db Wood Rd 3,333 0.63 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4D 158 100 50%410 410 129 129 50 32 80 98 SOUTHWEST BYPASS (2)3400' S Of Db Wood Rd 4800' S Of D B Wood Rd 1,353 0.26 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4D 158 100 100%410 410 105 105 40 26 65 79 SOUTHWEST BYPASS (2)4800' S Of D B Wood Rd 5900' S Of D B Wood Rd 1,109 0.21 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4D 158 100 100%410 410 86 86 33 21 53 65 SOUTHWEST BYPASS (3)5900' S Of D B Wood Rd Leander Rd 1,323 0.25 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4D 158 100 100%410 410 103 103 40 25 63 78 RR 2243 (1)2800' E Of Cr 176 3900' E Of Cr 176 11,030 2.09 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4D 593 549 100%410 410 857 857 1,239 1,147 -382 -290 382 290 RR 2243 (1)Escalera Pkwy Cr 176 4,987 0.94 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4D 593 549 100%410 410 387 387 560 519 -173 -131 173 131 RR 2243 (1)Garey Park Rd South Ridge Cir 5,922 1.12 1 1 3U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4D 593 549 100%510 510 572 572 665 616 -93 -44 93 44 RR 2243 (1)Limestone Creek Rd Escalera Pkwy 6,141 1.16 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4D 593 549 100%410 410 477 477 690 639 -213 -162 213 162 RR 2243 (1)Cr 176 2800' E Of Cr 176 2,772 0.53 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4D 593 549 100%410 410 215 215 311 288 -96 -73 96 73 RR 2243 (2)Norwood Dr Ih 35 4,361 0.83 2 2 3U Access Management 4D 593 549 100%510 510 843 843 490 453 353 389 RR 2243 (2)River Ridge Dr Norwood West 1,379 0.26 1 1 3U Access Management 4D 593 549 0%510 510 0 0 0 0 0 0 NEW SOUTHWEST BYPASS W University Ave D B Wood Rd 2,864 0.54 0 0 2u 2 Lane Major Arterial 4U n/a n/a 0%410 410 0 0 SUBTOTAL 73,612 11.79 8,101 8,101 5,067 5,375 3,033 2,725 863 684 1. Veh-Mi Supply Pk-Hr Total = [Length (mi)] * [Exist Lanes] * [Veh-Mi Capacity Pk-Hr Per Ln] * [% in Service Area] 2. Veh-Mi Demand Pk-Hr Total = [ Length (mi)] * [PM Peak Hour Vol] * [% In Service Area] 3. Excess Capacity Pk-Hr Veh-Mi = [Veh-Mi Supply Pk-Hr Total] - [Veh-Mi Demand Pk-Hr Total] 4. Existing Deficiencies Pk-Hr Veh-Mi = [Veh-Mi Demand Pk-Hr Total] - [Veh-Mi Supply Pk-Hr Total] Note: Mileage lengths are shown as rounded to the nearest 0.01. Actual calculations were performed using exact mileage length [Length (ft) / 5,280]. "n/a" are roadways that were not analyzed. Most of these roadways were 2 Lane Collectors or bridges over I-35 included as intersection projects. City of Georgetown - 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory EXIST LANES PM VEH-MI VEH-MI VEH-MI EXCESS EXISTING PEAK CAPACITY SUPPLY DEMAND CAPACITY DEFICIENCIES VOL PER LN TOTAL1 TOTAL2 VEH-MI3 VEH-MI4 HOUR PK-HR PK-HR PK-HR PK-HR 16,201 10,443 5,758 1,547 PK-HR 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown, Texas Appendix C - Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory PRE-CREDIT DRAFT Page 271 of 276 Service Area E 3/10/2020 % IN ROADWAY FROM TO LENGTH LENGTH EXIST CLASS FUTURE SERVICE (ft)(mi)XS LANES AREA NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB LEANDER RD 230' E Of Industrial AvenueFm 1460 1,349 0.26 2 2 5U Access Management 4D 984 715 100%770 770 394 394 251 183 142 211 LEANDER RD Scenic Drive S Austin Ave 2,219 0.42 2 2 5U Access Management 4D 771 826 100%770 770 647 647 324 347 323 300 LEANDER RD S Austin Ave Industrial Ave 1,246 0.24 2 2 5U Access Management 4D 984 715 100%770 770 363 363 232 169 131 195 LEANDER RD Industrial Avenue 230' E Of Industrial Avenue 231 0.04 2 2 5U Access Management 4D 984 715 100%770 770 67 67 43 31 24 36 S AUSTIN AVE Leander Rd 1000' S Of Cooperative Way 5,028 0.95 2 2 4D 4 Lane Major Arterial 4D 715 567 100%810 810 1,543 1,543 681 540 862 1,003 S AUSTIN AVE E 17Th Street Leander Rd 1,661 0.31 2 2 4U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4U 267 462 100%680 680 428 428 84 145 344 283 S AUSTIN AVE 1000' S Of Cooperative WaySe Inner Loop 609 0.12 2 2 4D 4 Lane Major Arterial 4D 715 567 100%810 810 187 187 82 65 104 121 FM 1460 (1)Leander Rd 2900' S Of Fm 1460 1,327 0.25 2 2 5U Previously Constructed 6U 984 715 100%770 770 387 387 247 180 140 207 FM 1460 (2)2900' S Of Fm 1460 4380' S Of Fm 1460 1,480 0.28 2 2 5U Previously Constructed 6U 984 715 100%770 770 432 432 276 200 156 231 FM 1460 (3)200' S Of Se Inner Loop 300' S Of Se Inner Loop 87 0.02 2 2 4U Previously Constructed 6U 984 715 100%680 680 22 22 16 12 6 11 FM 1460 (3)4380' S Of Fm 1460 200' S Of Se Inner Loop 2,118 0.40 2 2 4D Previously Constructed 6U 984 715 100%810 810 650 650 395 287 255 363 FM 1460 (4)300' S Of Se Inner Loop 700' S Of Fm 1460 764 0.14 2 2 4D Previously Constructed 6D 722 720 100%810 810 234 234 104 104 130 130 FM 1460 (5)700' S Of Fm 1460 1300' S Of Fm 1460 602 0.11 2 2 4D Previously Constructed 6D 722 720 50%810 810 92 92 41 41 51 51 FM 1460 (6)1300' S Of Fm 1460 1400' S Of Fm 1460 2,708 0.51 2 2 4D Previously Constructed 6D 722 720 100%810 810 831 831 370 369 461 462 FM 1460 (7)800' S Of La Conterra Blvd 1000' S Of La Conterra Blvd 180 0.03 2 2 4D Previously Constructed 6D 722 720 100%810 810 55 55 25 25 31 31 FM 1460 (7)1400' S Of Fm 1460 800' S Of La Conterra Blvd 869 0.16 2 2 4D Previously Constructed 6D 722 720 50%810 810 133 133 59 59 74 74 FM 1460 (8)1000' S Of La Conterra Blvd400' S Of Midnight Ln 969 0.18 2 2 4D Previously Constructed 6D 722 720 50%810 810 149 149 66 66 82 83 FM 1460 (9)400' S Of Midnight Ln 900' S Of Midnight Ln 486 0.09 2 2 4D Previously Constructed 6D 722 720 50%810 810 75 75 33 33 41 41 FM 1460 (10)900' S Of Midnight Ln Westinghouse Rd 1,622 0.31 2 2 4D Previously Constructed 6D 722 720 50%810 810 249 249 111 111 138 138 FM 1460 (11)700' S Of Westinghouse Rd1800' S Of Westinghouse Rd 1,041 0.20 2 2 4D Previously Constructed 6D 760 815 100%810 810 320 320 150 161 170 159 FM 1460 (11)Westinghouse Rd 700' S Of Westinghouse Rd 601 0.11 2 2 4D Previously Constructed 6D 760 815 100%810 810 185 185 87 93 98 92 SE INNER LOOP (1)S Austin Ave 600' W Of S Austin Ave 589 0.11 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4U 658 439 100%410 410 46 46 73 49 -28 -3 28 3 SE INNER LOOP (2)600' W Of S Austin Ave Cooperative Way 1,159 0.22 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4U 658 439 50%410 410 45 45 72 48 -27 -3 27 3 SE INNER LOOP (2)Cooperative Way 3500' E Of Cooperative Way 3,427 0.65 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4U 658 439 50%410 410 133 133 214 142 -80 -9 80 9 SE INNER LOOP (3)Fm 1460 Sam Houston Ave 2,129 0.40 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4U 762 514 100%410 410 165 165 307 207 -142 -42 142 42 SE INNER LOOP (3)3500' E Of Cooperative WayOld Fm 1460 789 0.15 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4U 658 439 100%410 410 61 61 98 66 -37 -4 37 4 SE INNER LOOP (3)Old Fm 1460 Fm 1460 84 0.02 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4U 658 439 100%410 410 6 6 10 7 -4 0 4 0 RABBIT HILL RD (2)900' S Of Clearview Dr 1200' S Of Clearview Dr 338 0.06 1 1 2U 4 Lane Collector 4U 28 68 50%410 410 13 13 1 2 12 11 RABBIT HILL RD (1)1200' S Of Clearview Dr Westinghouse Rd 1,733 0.33 1 1 2U 4 Lane Collector 4U 28 68 100%410 410 135 135 9 22 125 112 WESTINGHOUSE RD (1)S Ih 35 1800' E Of S Ih 35 1,166 0.22 2 2 4U 6 Lane Major Arterial 6D 726 528 100%680 680 300 300 160 117 140 184 WESTINGHOUSE RD (1)1800' E Of S Ih 35 Mays St 2,756 0.52 2 2 5U 6 Lane Major Arterial 6D 726 528 100%770 770 804 804 379 276 425 528 WESTINGHOUSE RD (1)Mays St 1900' E Of Mays St 1,876 0.36 2 2 4D 6 Lane Major Arterial 6D 502 358 100%810 810 576 576 178 127 397 448 WESTINGHOUSE RD (2)1900' E Of Mays St 1400' E Of Mays St 490 0.09 2 2 4D 6 Lane Major Arterial 6D 502 358 50%810 810 75 75 23 17 52 59 WESTINGHOUSE RD (3)1400' E Of Mays St 1600' E Of Mays St 214 0.04 2 2 4D 6 Lane Major Arterial 6D 502 358 100%810 810 66 66 20 15 45 51 WESTINGHOUSE RD (3)1600' E Of Mays St 1700' E Of Mays St 131 0.02 2 2 4D 6 Lane Major Arterial 6D 502 358 50%810 810 20 20 6 4 14 16 WESTINGHOUSE RD (3)1700' E Of Mays St 2000' E Of Mays St 250 0.05 2 2 4D 6 Lane Major Arterial 6D 502 358 100%810 810 77 77 24 17 53 60 WESTINGHOUSE RD (4)2000' E Of Mays St 4200' E Of Mays St 2,136 0.40 2 2 4D 6 Lane Major Arterial 6D 502 358 50%810 810 328 328 102 72 226 255 WESTINGHOUSE RD (5)4200' E Of Mays St 5720' E Of Mays St 1,519 0.29 2 2 4D 6 Lane Major Arterial 6D 502 358 100%810 810 466 466 144 103 322 363 WESTINGHOUSE RD (6)5720' E Of Mays St Fm 1460 659 0.12 2 2 4D 6 Lane Major Arterial 6D 502 358 50%810 810 101 101 31 22 70 79 WESTINGHOUSE RD (7)Fm 1460 Maple Street 3,810 0.72 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4D 264 126 100%410 410 296 296 191 91 105 205 MAPLE ST (1)E 22Nd Street Brittania Blvd 529 0.10 1 1 2U 4 Lane Collector 4U 203 37 50%410 410 21 21 10 2 10 19 MAPLE ST (2)1200' S Of Brittania Blvd Se Inner Loop 3,577 0.68 0 0 2u 4 Lane Collector 4U n/a n/a 50%410 410 0 0 MAPLE ST (2)Brittania Blvd 600' S Of Brittania Blvd 615 0.12 0 0 2u 4 Lane Collector 4U n/a n/a 50%410 410 0 0 MAPLE ST (2)600' S Of Brittania Blvd 1200' S Of Brittania Blvd 612 0.12 0 0 2u 4 Lane Collector 4U n/a n/a 50%410 410 0 0 MAPLE ST (3)1300' S Of Sam Houston AveW Ridge Line Blvd 1,695 0.32 1 1 2U 4 Lane Collector 4U 37 204 50%410 410 66 66 6 33 60 33 MAPLE ST (3)W Ridge Line Blvd Pinnacle Dr 920 0.17 1 1 2U 4 Lane Collector 4U 37 204 50%410 410 36 36 3 18 32 18 MAPLE ST (3)Sam Houston Ave 1300' S Of Sam Houston Ave 1,267 0.24 1 1 2U 4 Lane Collector 4U 37 204 100%410 410 98 98 9 49 89 49 MAPLE ST (3)Se Inner Loop Sam Houston Ave 257 0.05 1 1 2U 4 Lane Collector 4U 37 204 100%410 410 20 20 2 10 18 10 MAPLE ST (4)Pinnacle Dr Westinghouse Rd 4,414 0.84 0 0 2u 4 Lane Collector 4U n/a n/a 50%410 410 0 0 SUBTOTAL 37,445 6.53 7,831 7,831 4,345 3,668 3,486 4,163 277 57 1. Veh-Mi Supply Pk-Hr Total = [Length (mi)] * [Exist Lanes] * [Veh-Mi Capacity Pk-Hr Per Ln] * [% in Service Area] 2. Veh-Mi Demand Pk-Hr Total = [ Length (mi)] * [PM Peak Hour Vol] * [% In Service Area] 3. Excess Capacity Pk-Hr Veh-Mi = [Veh-Mi Supply Pk-Hr Total] - [Veh-Mi Demand Pk-Hr Total] 4. Existing Deficiencies Pk-Hr Veh-Mi = [Veh-Mi Demand Pk-Hr Total] - [Veh-Mi Supply Pk-Hr Total] Note: Mileage lengths are shown as rounded to the nearest 0.01. Actual calculations were performed using exact mileage length [Length (ft) / 5,280]. "n/a" are roadways that were not analyzed. Most of these roadways were 2 Lane Collectors or bridges over I-35 included as intersection projects. City of Georgetown - 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory EXIST LANES PM VEH-MI VEH-MI VEH-MI EXCESS EXISTING PEAK CAPACITY SUPPLY DEMAND CAPACITY DEFICIENCIES VOL PER LN TOTAL1 TOTAL2 VEH-MI3 VEH-MI4 HOUR PK-HR PK-HR PK-HR PK-HR 15,663 8,013 7,649 334 PK-HR 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown, Texas Appendix C - Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory PRE-CREDIT DRAFT Page 272 of 276 Service Area F 3/11/2020 % IN ROADWAY FROM TO LENGTH LENGTH EXIST CLASS FUTURE SERVICE (ft)(mi)XS LANES AREA NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB E SH 29 (1)800' E Of Haven Street Smith Creek Rd 2,533 0.48 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4U 621 727 50%410 410 98 98 149 174 -51 -76 51 76 E SH 29 (1)Smith Creek Rd Ne Inner Loop 2,402 0.45 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4U 621 727 50%410 410 93 93 141 165 -48 -72 48 72 E SH 29 (1)Haven Street 800' E Of Haven Street 747 0.14 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4U 740 628 50%410 410 29 29 52 44 -23 -15 23 15 E SH 29 (1)Ne Inner Loop 300' E Of Reinhardt Blvd 1,288 0.24 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4U 621 727 50%410 410 50 50 76 89 -26 -39 26 39 E SH 29 (2)Berry Lane Sh 130 432 0.08 1 1 2U Access Management 4D 621 727 50%410 410 17 17 25 30 -9 -13 9 13 MAPLE ST (1)E 22Nd Street Brittania Blvd 529 0.10 1 1 2U 4 Lane Collector 4U 203 37 50%410 410 21 21 10 2 10 19 MAPLE ST (2)1200' S Of Brittania Blvd Se Inner Loop 3,577 0.68 0 0 2u 4 Lane Collector 4U n/a n/a 50%410 410 0 0 MAPLE ST (2)Brittania Blvd 600' S Of Brittania Blvd 615 0.12 0 0 2u 4 Lane Collector 4U n/a n/a 50%410 410 0 0 MAPLE ST (2)600' S Of Brittania Blvd 1200' S Of Brittania Blvd 612 0.12 0 0 2u 4 Lane Collector 4U n/a n/a 50%410 410 0 0 MAPLE ST (3)1300' S Of Sam Houston AveW Ridge Line Blvd 1,695 0.32 1 1 2U 4 Lane Collector 4U 37 204 50%410 410 66 66 6 33 60 33 MAPLE ST (3)W Ridge Line Blvd Pinnacle Dr 920 0.17 1 1 2U 4 Lane Collector 4U 37 204 50%410 410 36 36 3 18 32 18 MAPLE ST (3)Sam Houston Ave 1300' S Of Sam Houston Ave 1,267 0.24 1 1 2U 4 Lane Collector 4U 37 204 100%410 410 98 98 9 49 89 49 MAPLE ST (3)Se Inner Loop Sam Houston Ave 257 0.05 1 1 2U 4 Lane Collector 4U 37 204 100%410 410 20 20 2 10 18 10 MAPLE ST (4)Pinnacle Dr Westinghouse Rd 4,414 0.84 0 0 2u 4 Lane Collector 4U 37 204 50%410 410 0 0 15 85 -15 -85 15 85 SE INNER LOOP (1)Sh 29 Churchill Farms 6,308 1.19 2 2 4D 4 Lane Minor Arterial 4D 263 462 100%810 810 1,935 1,935 314 552 1,621 1,383 SE INNER LOOP (2)Southwestern Blvd Rockride Ln 1,409 0.27 1 1 2U 4 Lane Minor Arterial 4D 207 106 50%410 410 55 55 28 14 27 41 SE INNER LOOP (3)Maple Street Southwestern Blvd 4,049 0.77 1 1 2U 4 Lane Minor Arterial 4D 542 503 100%410 410 314 314 416 386 -101 -71 101 71 SOUTHWESTERN BLVD (1) Raintree Dr 1500' S Of Raintree Dr 1,498 0.28 1 1 2U-OP 4 Lane Minor Arterial 3U 250 300 100%330 330 94 94 71 85 23 9 SOUTHWESTERN BLVD (2) 2500' S Of Raintree Dr Se Inner Loop 347 0.07 1 1 2U 4 Lane Minor Arterial 3U 250 300 50%410 410 13 13 8 10 5 4 SOUTHWESTERN BLVD (2) 1500' S Of Raintree Dr 2500' S Of Raintree Dr 990 0.19 1 1 2U-OP 4 Lane Minor Arterial 3U 250 300 50%330 330 31 31 23 28 8 3 SOUTHWESTERN BLVD (3) Se Inner Loop Sam Houston Ave 3,481 0.66 1 1 3U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4U 250 300 100%510 510 336 336 165 198 171 138 SOUTHWESTERN BLVD (4) Sam Houston Ave 2400' S Of Sam Houston Ave 2,315 0.44 0 0 2u 4 Lane Major Arterial 4U 250 300 100%410 410 0 0 110 132 -110 -132 110 132 SOUTHWESTERN BLVD (4)2400' S Of Sam Houston AveRockride Ln 830 0.16 0 0 2u 4 Lane Major Arterial 4U 250 300 100%410 410 0 0 39 47 -39 -47 39 47 SOUTHWESTERN BLVD (5)2900' S Of Sam Houston AveFairhaven Gtwy 579 0.11 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4D 143 101 100%410 410 45 45 16 11 29 34 SOUTHWESTERN BLVD (5) Fairhaven Gtwy Cr 110 657 0.12 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4D 143 101 100%410 410 51 51 18 13 33 38 SOUTHWESTERN BLVD (5)2400' S Of Sam Houston AveRockride Ln 2,488 0.47 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4U 143 101 100%410 410 193 193 67 48 126 146 ROCKRIDE LN (1)Se Inner Loop Sam Houston Ave 4,011 0.76 1 1 2U 4 Lane Collector 4D 521 387 100%410 410 311 311 396 294 -84 17 84 ROCKRIDE LN (2)400' S Of Sam Houston Ave1700' S Of Sam Houston Ave 1,755 0.33 1 1 2U 4 Lane Collector 4D 141 136 50%410 410 68 68 23 23 45 46 ROCKRIDE LN (2)Sam Houston Ave 400' S Of Sam Houston Ave 389 0.07 1 1 2U 4 Lane Collector 4D 141 136 100%410 410 30 30 10 10 20 20 ROCKRIDE LN (3)1700' S Of Sam Houston Ave2900' S Of Sam Houston Ave 480 0.09 1 1 2U 4 Lane Collector 4D 141 136 100%410 410 37 37 13 12 24 25 CARLSON COVE 1900' E Of Carson Cove Sam Houston Ave 5,327 1.01 1 1 2U 4 Lane Minor Arterial 4D n/a n/a 100%410 410 414 414 PATRIOT WAY (1)6200' N Of Sam Houston AveSam Houston Ave 2,384 0.45 1 1 3U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4U n/a n/a 100%510 510 230 230 SAM HOUSTON (1)Rockride Ln 200' E Of Bellgin Rd 4,302 0.81 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4D 175 155 100%410 410 334 334 143 126 191 208 SAM HOUSTON (1)Southwestern Blvd Rockride Ln 2,230 0.42 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4D 228 182 100%410 410 173 173 96 77 77 96 SAM HOUSTON (1)200' E Of Bellgin Rd Patriot Way 2,816 0.53 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 4D 119 121 100%410 410 219 219 63 65 155 154 SAM HOUSTON (2)Patriot Way Sh 130 Nb 3,209 0.61 0 0 2u 2 Lane Major Arterial 4D n/a n/a 100%410 410 0 0 SAM HOUSTON (2)Sh 130 Nb 2900' E Of Sh 130 Nb 2,854 0.54 0 0 2u 2 Lane Major Arterial 4D n/a n/a 100%410 410 0 0 BELL GIN RD Sam Houston Ave Marvin Lewis Lane 8,229 1.56 1 1 2U 4 Lane Minor Arterial 4D 84 102 50%410 410 319 319 65 79 254 240 WESTINGHOUSE RD Maple St Southwestern Blvd 5,349 1.01 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 6D 234 126 50%410 410 208 208 119 64 89 144 WESTINGHOUSE RD Southwestern Blvd Bell Gin Road 4,301 0.81 1 1 2U 4 Lane Major Arterial 6D 186 120 50%410 410 167 167 76 49 91 118 SUBTOTAL 93,877 8.29 3,403 3,403 1,697 2,174 1,706 1,228 422 550 1. Veh-Mi Supply Pk-Hr Total = [Length (mi)] * [Exist Lanes] * [Veh-Mi Capacity Pk-Hr Per Ln] * [% in Service Area] 2. Veh-Mi Demand Pk-Hr Total = [ Length (mi)] * [PM Peak Hour Vol] * [% In Service Area] 3. Excess Capacity Pk-Hr Veh-Mi = [Veh-Mi Supply Pk-Hr Total] - [Veh-Mi Demand Pk-Hr Total] 4. Existing Deficiencies Pk-Hr Veh-Mi = [Veh-Mi Demand Pk-Hr Total] - [Veh-Mi Supply Pk-Hr Total] Note: Mileage lengths are shown as rounded to the nearest 0.01. Actual calculations were performed using exact mileage length [Length (ft) / 5,280]. "n/a" are roadways that were not analyzed. Most of these roadways were 2 Lane Collectors or bridges over I-35 included as intersection projects. 6,805 3,871 2,935 972 PK-HR VOL PER LN TOTAL1 TOTAL2 VEH-MI3 VEH-MI4 HOUR PK-HR PK-HR PK-HR PK-HR City of Georgetown - 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory EXIST LANES PM VEH-MI VEH-MI VEH-MI EXCESS EXISTING PEAK CAPACITY SUPPLY DEMAND CAPACITY DEFICIENCIES 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown, Texas Appendix C - Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory PRE-CREDIT DRAFT Page 273 of 276 Service Area SC 3/10/2020 % IN ROADWAY FROM TO LENGTH LENGTH EXIST CLASS FUTURE SERVICE (ft)(mi)XS LANES AREA NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB Ronald W Reagan Blvd (1)Somerset Hills 700' W Of Cr 245 2,635 0.50 1 1 2U Major Arterial 6D 400 400 50%410 410 102 102 100 100 2 2 Ronald W Reagan Blvd (2)Ridgetop Vista Dr 400' E Of Sun City Blvd 2,004 0 1 1 3U Major Arterial 6D 400 400 1 510 510 97 97 76 76 21 21 Ronald W Reagan Blvd (3) 400' E Of Sun City Blvd Telegraph Ln 1,347 0 1 1 3U Major Arterial 6D 400 400 1 510 510 130 130 102 102 28 28 Ronald W Reagan Blvd (4)Telegraph Ln 4000' E Of Telegraph Ln 2,994 1 1 1 2U Major Arterial 6D 400 400 1 410 410 116 116 113 113 3 3 Ronald W Reagan Blvd (5)Telegraph Ln 4000' E Of Telegraph Ln 900 0 1 1 2U Major Arterial 6D 400 400 1 410 410 35 35 34 34 1 1 Ronald W Reagan Blvd (6) Ronald W Reagan Blvd1400' S Of Ronald W Reagan Blvd1,328 0 1 1 2U Collector 3U 400 400 1 410 410 103 103 101 101 3 3 Ronald W Reagan Blvd (7)1400' S Of Ronald W Reagan Blvd2300' S Of Ronald W Reagan Blvd 839 0 1 1 2U Collector 3U 400 400 1 410 410 33 33 32 32 1 1 Ronald W Reagan Blvd (7)1200' N Of Rocky Hollow Creek Dr Rm 2338 2,495 0 1 1 2U Collector 3U 400 400 1 410 410 97 97 95 95 2 2 Cr 245 (1)3000' E Of Indian Springs Rd7000' E Of Indian Springs Rd 3,757 1 2 2 5U Major Arterial 5U 400 400 1 770 770 548 548 142 142 406 406 Cr 245 (2)350' S Of Cr 245 W Ridgewood Rd 1,898 0 2 2 5U Major Arterial 5U 400 400 1 770 770 277 277 72 72 205 205 Cr 245 (3)800' E Of Highland Spring Ln 500' S Of Casaloma Cir 3,148 1 2 2 5U Major Arterial 5U 793 983 1 770 770 459 459 236 293 223 166 Rm 2338 (1)800' E Of Highland Spring Ln 500' S Of Casaloma Cir 714 0 2 2 5U Major Arterial 5U 584 833 1 770 770 104 104 39 56 65 48 Rm 2338 (2)800' E Of Highland Spring Ln 500' S Of Casaloma Cir 1,388 0 2 2 5U Major Arterial 5U 908 1540 1 770 770 202 202 119 202 83 0 Williams Dr 700' W Of Cr 245 1100' E Of Silver Spur Blvd 8,331 2 1 1 2U Major Arterial 6D 400 400 1 410 410 647 647 631 631 16 16 Williams Dr 1100' E Of Silver Spur Blvd3000' E Of Silver Spur Blvd 1,861 0 1 1 2U Major Arterial 6D 400 400 1 410 410 72 72 70 70 2 2 Williams Dr 600' W Of Ridgetop Vista Dr Ridgetop Vista Dr 575 0 1 1 2U Major Arterial 6D 400 400 1 410 410 45 45 44 44 1 1 SUBTOTAL 36,214 6.86 3,067 3,067 2,007 2,163 1,060 904 0 0 1. Veh-Mi Supply Pk-Hr Total = [Length (mi)] * [Exist Lanes] * [Veh-Mi Capacity Pk-Hr Per Ln] * [% in Service Area] 2. Veh-Mi Demand Pk-Hr Total = [ Length (mi)] * [PM Peak Hour Vol] * [% In Service Area] 3. Excess Capacity Pk-Hr Veh-Mi = [Veh-Mi Supply Pk-Hr Total] - [Veh-Mi Demand Pk-Hr Total] 4. Existing Deficiencies Pk-Hr Veh-Mi = [Veh-Mi Demand Pk-Hr Total] - [Veh-Mi Supply Pk-Hr Total] Note: Mileage lengths are shown as rounded to the nearest 0.01. Actual calculations were performed using exact mileage length [Length (ft) / 5,280]. "n/a" are roadways that were not analyzed. Most of these roadways were 2 Lane Collectors or bridges over I-35 included as intersection projects. City of Georgetown - 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory EXIST LANES PM VEH-MI VEH-MI VEH-MI EXCESS EXISTING PEAK CAPACITY SUPPLY DEMAND CAPACITY DEFICIENCIES VOL PER LN TOTAL1 TOTAL2 VEH-MI3 VEH-MI4 HOUR PK-HR PK-HR PK-HR PK-HR 6,134 4,170 1,964 0 PK-HR 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study City of Georgetown, Texas Appendix C - Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory PRE-CREDIT DRAFT Page 274 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT D Appendix D – Plan for Awarding the Street Impact Fee Credit Summary Page 275 of 276 2020 Transportation Impact Fee Study Draft March 2020 City of Georgetown, Texas PRE-CREDIT DRAFT E Appendix E – Plan for Awarding the Street Impact Fee Credit Supporting Exhibits Page 276 of 276