HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda_GTAB_12.12.2013Notice of Meeting for the
Georgetown Transportation Advisory Board and the Governing Body
of the City of Georgetown
December 12, 2013 at 10:00 AM
at the Georgetown Municipal Complex, 300-1 Industrial Ave, Georgetown, Texas 78626
The City of Georgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If you
require assistance in participating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the ADA, reasonable
assistance, adaptations, or accommodations will be provided upon request. Please contact the City at least four
(4) days prior to the scheduled meeting date, at (512) 930-3652 or City Hall at 113 East 8th Street for
additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711.
Regular Session
(This Regular Session may, at any time, be recessed to convene an Executive Session for any purpose
authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code 551.)
A Call to Order
The Board may, at any time, recess the Regular Session to convene in Executive Session at
the request of the Chair, a Board Member, the City Manager, Assistant City Manager, General
Manager of Utilities, City Council Member, or legal counsel for any purpose authorized by the
Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code Chapter 551, and are subject to action in the
Regular Session that follows.
B Introduction of Visitors
C Industry/CAMPO/TXDOT Updates
D Discussion regarding the Project Progress Reports and Time Lines. – Bill Dryden, P.E.,
Transportation Engineer, Mark Miller, Transportation Services Manager and Edward G.
Polasek, AICP, Transportation Services Director.
E Discussion regarding the Airport Project Progress Report and time lines. – Curtis Benkendorfer,
Acting Airport Manager and Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Transportation Services Director
Legislative Regular Agenda
F Review and possible action to approve the minutes from the Regular GTAB Board meeting held
on November 08, 2013. - Jana Kern – GTAB Board Liaison
G Consideration and possible recommendation to authorize payment of Texas Department of
Transportation (“TxDOT”) invoice in the amount of $87,500.68 in connection with proposed
amended/increased funding agreement for TxDOT Aviation Grant Project #1214GRGTN. –
Curtis Benkendorfer, Interim Airport Manager, and Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Transportation
Services Director
H Consideration and possible direction to staff concerning Street Maintenance programs based on
outcome of 2013 Street CIP projects -- Mark Miller, Transportation Manager, and Edward G.
Polasek, AICP, Transportation Services Director.
I Consideration and possible direction to staff concerning Project Priority Listing for Funding
Consideration -- Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Transportation Services Director, and Jim Briggs,
General Manager of Utilities.
Adjournment
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
I, Jessica Brettle, City Secretary for the City of Georgetown, Texas, do hereby certify that this Notice of
Meeting was posted at City Hall, 113 E. 8th Street, a place readily accessible to the general public at all times,
on the ______ day of __________________, 2013, at __________, and remained so posted for at least 72
continuous hours preceding the scheduled time of said meeting.
____________________________________
Jessica Brettle, City Secretary
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Call to Order
The Board may, at any time, recess the Regular Session to convene in Executive Session at the request of
the Chair, a Board Member, the City Manager, Assistant City Manager, General Manager of Utilities,
City Council Member, or legal counsel for any purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas
Government Code Chapter 551, and are subject to action in the Regular Session that follows.
ITEM SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
SUBMITTED BY:
Jana Kern
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Introduction of Visitors
ITEM SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
SUBMITTED BY:
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Industry/CAMPO/TXDOT Updates
ITEM SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
SUBMITTED BY:
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Discussion regarding the Project Progress Reports and Time Lines. – Bill Dryden, P.E., Transportation
Engineer, Mark Miller, Transportation Services Manager and Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Transportation
Services Director.
ITEM SUMMARY:
GTAB Projects
DB Wood Road Improvements @ Proposed Public Safety Training Center
FM 971 Realignment at Austin Avenue
FM 1460 Improvements Project
N Austin Avenue Sidewalk Improvements
Safe Routes to School - Churchill to Mitchell Elem
Southeast Inner Loop Corridor Study
Southwest Bypass Project (TIP #14C)
Transit Study as Requested by City Council
Transportation Services Operations – CIP Maintenance
GTEC Projects
Project Update and Status Report
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
SUBMITTED BY:
Bill Dryden
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Discussion regarding the Airport Project Progress Report and time lines. – Curtis Benkendorfer, Acting
Airport Manager and Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Transportation Services Director
ITEM SUMMARY:
Airport Projects:
Tower Update
Project No. 1314GRGTN
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
SUBMITTED BY:
Jana Kern
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Tower Update Backup Material
Engineer Update Backup Material
Georgetown Municipal Airport Contract Tower Program Update
December 2013 – NO CHANGE
Project Description Air Traffic Control states that the latest update is that funding remains through January 2014,
to which legislation will review the budget at that time.
Purpose
Project Manager Curtis Benkendorfer, Acting Airport Manager
Engineer
Notes
Engineering Selection
for
Project No. 1314GRGTN
December 2013 – NO CHANGE
Project Description On Thursday, October 24, 2013; Garver Engineers, TxDOT representatives and City Staff met;
current status –
Fuel Farm: Two options for the fuel farm layout were presented to TxDOT and the City of
Georgetown. The location for the fuel farm remained the same for each option but differed
by the manner in which the fueling tanker accessed the above ground tanks. After
discussion, it was recommended by TxDOT that a third option be prepared, and included in
the Preliminary Engineering Report, that uses the existing roadway access but rotates the
above ground tanks in a more north-south direction. This third option will better utilize the
land between the proposed fuel farm and existing terminal building.
Terminal Development Plan: Three areas for future hangar expansion were proposed to
TxDOT with three development options for each area. Garver will take TxDOT and the
City’s comments into account and revise the proposed hangar development report
accordingly.
The project for FY2014 will include the new medium intensity runway lights on both
runways and a new PAPI for Runway 11/29. This FY2014 project will allow bids on or
around July 2014. The design of the project for FY2015 will be completed at the same time as
the FY2014 project but will likely not be constructed until FY2015 (anticipating spring of
2015) due to TxDOT funding allocation for the airport.
Purpose Project 1314GRGTN
Project Manager Curtis Benkendorfer, Acting Airport Manager
Engineer Garver
Notes
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Review and possible action to approve the minutes from the Regular GTAB Board meeting held on
November 08, 2013. - Jana Kern – GTAB Board Liaison
ITEM SUMMARY:
Board to review and revise and/or approve the minutes from the regular meeting held on November 08,
2013.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
SUBMITTED BY:
Jana Kern
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
November Board Mnues Backup Material
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Consideration and possible recommendation to authorize payment of Texas Department of Transportation
(“TxDOT”) invoice in the amount of $87,500.68 in connection with proposed amended/increased funding
agreement for TxDOT Aviation Grant Project #1214GRGTN. – Curtis Benkendorfer, Interim Airport
Manager, and Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Transportation Services Director
ITEM SUMMARY:
On January 24, 2012, Council passed Resolution No. 012412-J authorizing an estimated cost of
$42,500.00 as the City's 10% portion of a grant from the Texas Department of Transportation ("TxDOT")
Aviation Division for airport runway improvements originally estimated at $425,000.00.
On November 6, 2013, the City received the attached invoice in the amount of $87,500.68, which
represents the City's 10% portion of increased property acquisition and environmental costs over and
above the original estimate of $42,500.00. Accordingly, TxDOT is seeking the Texas Transportation
Commission's ("TTC") authorization to increase the project estimate to $943,280.00 pursuant to the
attached proposed Amendment No. 1, which is on the TTC's December 19, 2013 meeting agenda.
Therefore, any City approvals for the additional funding are subject to TTC approval.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
To be funded by account number 600-5-0636-52-131 - FY 2012/2013 Airport CIP Improvements.
SUBMITTED BY:
Terri Glasby Calhoun
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
TxDOT invoice Backup Material
TxDOT draft proposed Amendment No. 1 to Participation Agreement Backup Material
Page 1 of 3
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
AIRPORT PROJECT PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT
(Federally Assisted Airport Development)
TxDOT CSJ No.: 1214GRGTN
TxDOT Project No.: AP GEORGETOWN 4
TxDOT Contract No. : 2XXAV080
Commission Approval: January 26, 2012
December 19, 2013
NPE Funds Applied: FY11
DUNS: 089592372
C.F.D.A.:20.106
Amendment No. 01 to the Agreement
Part I - Identification of the Project
TO: The City of Georgetown, Texas
FROM: The State of Texas, acting through the Texas Department of Transportation
The City of Georgetown, Texas, hereinafter referred to as the "Sponsor,” and the Texas
Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as the "State," have entered into an Airport
Project Participation Agreement TxDOT CSJ Number 1214GRGTN, executed by the Sponsor on
May 10, 2012, and by the State on May 21, 2012, for the development of the Georgetown
Municipal Airport, hereinafter referred to as the "Airport".
The project is described as engineering/design services to: acquire runway protection
zone Runway 11 and acquire runway protection zone and threshold sighting surface to Runway
29 at the Georgetown Municipal Airport.
It is in the mutual interest of the Sponsor and the State to increase the grant by $553,280
for additional land costs.
Part II - Offer of Financial Assistance, estimates total project costs to be $390,000; and
financial assistance is currently limited to $351,000 in federal funds and $39,000 in local
sponsor funds.
The following amendment to the Airport Project Participation Agreement shall become
effective upon execution of this Amendment by the Sponsor and the State.
The Airport Project Participation Agreement is amended as follows:
Page 2 of 3
1. On Part II, Item No. 2 of the Agreement, change Amount A, estimated total project
costs, and any further references in the Agreement to Amount A, to $943,280.
2. On Part II, Item No. 2 of the Agreement, change Amount B, estimated project costs
eligible for federal financial assistance, and any further references in the Agreement to Amount
B, to $943,280.
3. On Part II, Item 3 of the Agreement, change Amount C, the maximum obligation of the
United States payable under this offer, and any further references in the Agreement to Amount
C, to $848,952.
4. On Part II, Item 4 of the Agreement, change Amount D, Sponsor's share of the estimated
design costs, and any further references in the Agreement to Amount D to $94,328.
All other terms and conditions of the agreement are unchanged and remain in full force
and effect.
This Amendment to the Airport Project Participation Agreement between the City of
Georgetown, Texas, and the Texas Department of Transportation is mutually agreed to and
accepted.
Executed this day of , 20____.
The City of Georgetown, Texas
Sponsor
Witness Signature Sponsor Signature
Witness Title Sponsor Title
Page 3 of 3
Execution by the State
Executed by and approved for the Texas Transportation Commission for the purpose and effect
of activating and/or carrying out the orders, established policies or work programs and grants
heretofore approved and authorized by the Texas Transportation Commission.
STATE OF TEXAS
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
By:_______________________________________
Date:_____________________________________
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Consideration and possible direction to staff concerning Street Maintenance programs based on outcome
of 2013 Street CIP projects -- Mark Miller, Transportation Manager, and Edward G. Polasek, AICP,
Transportation Services Director.
ITEM SUMMARY:
As part of the 2012/13 Transportation CIP, many streets were treated with Chip Seal. Generally a Chip
Seal is a product were oil and rock are placed on roadway to provide uniform surface and texture restoring
traction to reduce moisture intrusion and protect the sub-surface of the roadway. The City has
specifications for rock type and size that in theory minimize the noise and improve the color of the
roadway from the roadways in some rural areas that appear gray and produce more ambient noise.
The results of the Chip Seal is some areas were a failure, with extreme loss of rock and little public
acceptance. In some areas the product worked as expected, but when compared with roads that received a
Cutler process. Hot Recycle (Cutler Process) is a single pass process where the top ¾ inch of asphalt is
heated and recycled with 1 inch virgin asphalt placed on top to provide a new driving surface, and the
process cost up to 7 times more per lane mile than Chip Seal.
Attached is a presentation preparred for Sun City explaining the maintenance options. We will begin our
discussion concerning the "tool box" of options for future maintenance programs.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
to be determined
SUBMITTED BY:
Edward G. Polasek, AICP
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Street maintenance presentation Presentation
1
Del Webb Blvd.
• Del Webb was originally scheduled for a TMRSS coating in
2013.
• TMRSS was found to not be compatible on higher speed
roadways.
• With Drought conditions fatigue and cracking worsened an
required greater maintenance
• A chip seal was recommended and approved through the CI
process. The project was bid and let.
• The chip seal has failed.
• A new contractor has been hired to repair the damaged
roadway. (Cutler Repaving)
TRANSPORTATION SERVICES
Street and Drainage Department
The Street department manages, maintains and repairs city
streets and rights-of-way. The Street Department Capital
Improvement Budget includes maintenance and
rehabilitation of the City’s roadway system and support o
new transportation construction projects.
2
Obligations
Lane Miles of Streets 635
Number of Signals 17
+ 33 (coordinated with TxDOT).
Patching 35,000 sf annually
Sign replace/repair 1,400 annually
(inventory presently being conducted)
Detention ponds 38
Phase II Stormwater regulations pending
Street Maintenance Funding
Revenue
$2.1 million-quarter of a cent sales tax.
$875K-general fund (property tax).
Expenditures
Rehabilitation.
Preventative Maintenance:
Crack Seal
TMRSS (fog seal/rejuvenator)
Chip seal
Hot Recycle (Cutler Process)
Mill and overlay
3
Pavement Condition Index (PCI)
• The 635 lane miles evaluated every 3 years
• PCI ranking 0-100
• Council established minimum PCI score of 85
• 2008 score (92)
• 2011 score (89)
• Recent reduction partially because of annexations of
poor condition County Roads and cracking of
roadway related to the extreme drought conditions
• Next score in 2014
Preventative Vs. Rehabilitation
• To keep the OCI (overall condition index) at 85% the
majority of a city’s maintenance funds are planned to
be spent on preventative maintenance
• Reconstruction and Rehabilitation should be spent as
funding is available.
• OCI predicted to drop in the future as a large portion of
the existing maintenance funds must be used to care
for a growing number of lane miles of arterials like
Williams Dr. and Inner Loop.
4
Preventative Maintenance
• Sealing protects the subgrade from moisture
• Moisture softens the subgrade and deteriorates the
asphalt
• Prevents more costly repairs – rehabilitation.
• Curb repair and replacement
• Asphalt and subgrade failures = patching
Total Rehabilitation cost $2.64 million per lane mile
Replacement of curbs, sub-base and asphalt.
Preventative Maintenance Costs
Mill and Overlay $84,500 per lane mile
10 years (with preventative maintenance)
Cutler (hot in place) $70,000 per lane mile
15 years (with preventative maintenance)
Chip seal $17,600 per lane mile
5-7 years
TMRSS (Tire Rubber Modified Surface Sealer) “fog seal”
$ 6,700 per lane mile
3-4 years
Crack seal Costs vary
5
Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
Process
Oct-Mar
Staff recommends future street maintenance and rehabilitation projec
Council approves consultants for engineering and construction
administration of previously approved projects.
Staff and consultants work on current and future years simultaneously
Mar-Jun
The annual CIP projects are packaged and bid and presented to the G
(Georgetown Advisory Board) for review and recommendation.
Jun-Sept
Council approves CIP as part of the Budget process
Feb-Jun: Council awards CIP bid packages for construction
Implementation
1) Consulting engineer utilized to design projects
for bid and construction.
2) Projects presented to GTAB for
recommendation.
3) Projects forwarded to Council for award.
4) Project handed off to Systems Engineering for
construction / inspection.
6
Questions?
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Consideration and possible direction to staff concerning Project Priority Listing for Funding
Consideration -- Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Transportation Services Director, and Jim Briggs, General
Manager of Utilities.
ITEM SUMMARY:
At previous GTAB Meetings staff has presented a list of portential bond projects. At our November
Meeting, we discussed the potential cost of addressing those needs in order to set a priority list of projects.
A preliminary review of the potential cost is attached.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
SUBMITTED BY:
Edward G. Polasek
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Bond LIst with estimates Cover Memo
Total
Estimated
Costs
$M
# Roadway
High
Priority
Estimated
Cost
$M
Medium
Priority
Estimated
Cost
$M
Long Term
Priority
Estimated
Cost
$M
Wil Co
Bond Notes
FM 1460 ÖÖÖÖ Oct 2014 Letting
SW Bypass Routing Study ÖÖÖÖ Ongoing
Berry Creek Drive ÖÖÖÖ
widen to 4 lane divided (must find a way to
move forward)
FM 971 ÖÖÖÖ
Partial intersection improvement in 2014,
remainder awaiting TxDOT
# Roadway
High
Priority
Estimated
Cost
$M
Medium
Priority
Estimated
Cost
$M
Long Term
Priority
Estimated
Cost
$M
Wil Co
Bond Notes
Northwest Blvd Bridge ÖÖÖÖ 8.00 2015-2017 8.00
SW Bypass
SH 29 to Leander Road ÖÖÖÖ 12.00 construct 2 lanes in Freeway ROW 12.00
Leander Road to IH 35 ÖÖÖÖ ÖÖÖÖ construct 2 lanes in Freeway ROW
D. B. Wood Road Ext. (SH 29 to Bypass, jug handle)ÖÖÖÖ 6.00
construct 2 lanes of 4 (a.k.a Wolf Ranch Pkwy
extension)6.00
8.00 18.00 26.00 26.00
# Roadway
High
Priority
Estimated
Cost
$M
Medium
Priority
Estimated
Cost
$M
Long Term
Priority
Estimated
Cost
$M
Wil Co
Bond Notes
IH 35 NB Frontage Road (Williams to SH 130)ÖÖÖÖ 6.00 in conjunction with NW Blvd Bridge 6.00
Rivery Extension (Williams to Northwest)ÖÖÖÖ 8.00 unassured neighbors/property owners 8.00
8.00 Area Improvements Widening/Intersections
D.B. Wood @ SH 29 Intersection ÖÖÖÖ ÖÖÖÖ
NE Inner Loop (FM 971 to CR 151)ÖÖÖÖ gap in NE Inner Loop (ROW and improve)
CR 151 (N. Austin Ave to FM 971)ÖÖÖÖ
could go with CR 151 as corridor
improvement.
Airport Road @ Lakeway ÖÖÖÖ
intersection improvements and possible signal
in front of Airport Road project.
Lakeway @ Northwest ÖÖÖÖ intersection improvements
CR 152 @ SH 130 ÖÖÖÖ improve CR to urban section (Collector)
Southwestern Blvd. (Raintree to S.E. Inner Loop)ÖÖÖÖ improve CR to urban section (Collector)
Sidewalk gap pool ÖÖÖÖ ÖÖÖÖ ÖÖÖÖ gaps in system and ADA transition
Unidentified Needs ÖÖÖÖ ÖÖÖÖ ÖÖÖÖ
examples: Sun City @ Red Poppy, Shell Road
@ Sycamore
Commitments: by development/interlocal agreements
2008 Road Bonds:
Priority Projects:
2013 Bond Priority List
PDFConvert.9682.1.Bond_2013_with_Preliminary_Costs_(WBD).xlsx page 1 of 4 12/5/2013
Leander Road (RR 2243) @ Escalera Parkway ÖÖÖÖ
_______ @ SH 29 Intersection ÖÖÖÖ
Rivery Conference Center TIA (Potential Improvements)Depends on Conference Center decision
Wolf Ranch Parkway ÖÖÖÖ
Williams @ Rivery Intersection ÖÖÖÖ 2.00 will move to Area Improvements if not in TIA.2.00
Williams/Frontage Road to Rivery ÖÖÖÖ 10.00
will move to TxDOT development process if
not in TIA. (inadequate bridge structure)10.00
D. B. Wood Road
Bridge @ Middlefork of S.G.ÖÖÖÖ 6.00 replace and widen bridge at Middel Fork only 6.00
Widen to 4 lane divided (SH 29 to Oak Ridge Drive)ÖÖÖÖ 17.00
Option recommended by GTAB over just the
Middle Fork Bridge Replacement 17.00
Widen to 4 lane divided (Oak Ridge Drive to Williams)ÖÖÖÖ 16.00
Includes bridge expansion at San Gabriel/Lake
Georgetown Dam.16.00
Airport Road ÖÖÖÖ
KK1 Airport Rd. (IH 35 To Lakeway Dr.)ÖÖÖÖ 8.00 widen to 4 lanes divided 8.00
KK2 Airport Rd. (Lakeway Dr. To Berry Creek Dr.)ÖÖÖÖ 8.00 widen to 4 lanes divided 8.00
Inner Loop
SH 29 E. to Southwestern (widen to 4 lanes)ÖÖÖÖ partial Wil Co.ÖÖÖÖ
widen to 4 lanes divided , w/ alternative
intersection design @ Rockride Lane
Southwestern to IH 35 (widen to 4 lanes)ÖÖÖÖ 12.00 4 lanes divided w ROW for FRWY 12.00
IH 35 SB Frontage Road (Williams to Rivery)ÖÖÖÖ 18.00 Intersection/merging lanes through bridge 18.00
Shell Road from Williams to SH 195 ÖÖÖÖ 4 lanes divided w ROW for 6
RR 2243 (Leander Road) Gary Park to River Ridge TxDOT Development Process
Preliminary Schematic Development ÖÖÖÖ 4 lanes divided w ROW for 6
PS&E & possible ROW dollars ÖÖÖÖ
Project Construction ÖÖÖÖ 40.00 40.00
RR 2243 (Leander Road @ IH 35) TxDOT Development Process
Bridge Widening ÖÖÖÖ 8.00 improve left turn to NB Frontage capacity 8.00
Westbound turn lanes at NB Frontage ÖÖÖÖ 2.00
handle capacity loss due to new frontage road
configuration.2.00
Rabbitt Hill Road/Oakmont Drive
Oakmont (RR) to Westinghouse ÖÖÖÖ 7.00 construct new 4 lane roadway 7.00
Blue Springs to Westinghouse ÖÖÖÖ 10.00 widen to 4 lanes divided w ROW for 6 10.00
Rockride Lane (former CR 110)
Sam Houston to Westinghouse ÖÖÖÖ 4.00 widen to 4 lanes divided 4.00
Westinghouse to ETJ ÖÖÖÖ 6.00 widen to 4 lanes divided w ROW for 6 6.00
Southwestern Blvd. (Sam Houston to Rockride)ÖÖÖÖ new construction 4/6
Westinghouse Road
FM 1460 to Rockride ÖÖÖÖ ÖÖÖÖ ÖÖÖÖ widen to 4 lanes divided w ROW for 6
Rockride Lane to ETJ ÖÖÖÖ ÖÖÖÖ widen to 4 lanes divided w ROW for 6
IH 35 to FM 1460 ÖÖÖÖ 15.00
complete reconstruction w/adequate ROW for
Major Arterial 15.00
33.00 57.00 113.00 203.00 203.00
* High Priority -1-5 years (to 2018); Medium Priority 5-10 years (to 2023); Long Term (beyond)229.00
PDFConvert.9682.1.Bond_2013_with_Preliminary_Costs_(WBD).xlsx page 2 of 4 12/5/2013
#a#Italics pojects Williamson County selected for bond presentation
Hashed projects COG proposal to Williamson County for Bond
PDFConvert.9682.1.Bond_2013_with_Preliminary_Costs_(WBD).xlsx page 3 of 4 12/5/2013
# Project Completed Ongoing Long Term Notes
SE 1/Maple ÖÖÖÖ
DB Wood/Williams ÖÖÖÖ
FM 1460 ÖÖÖÖ Oct 2014 Letting
SW Bypass Routing
Study ÖÖÖÖ Ongoing
FM 971 ÖÖÖÖ
Partial intersection
improvement in 2012 and
2014, remainder awaiting
TxDOT
Berry Creek Drive ÖÖÖÖ
widen to 4 lane divided
(must find a way to move
forward)
Project Status
2008 Road Bonds
2008 Road Bonds: $46,000,000
$12,045,000
$33,955,000
Total Issued:
Remaining:
May 209, May 2010, and Oct 2010
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
ITEM SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
SUBMITTED BY: