Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agend_ GTAB_12.12.2021
Notice of Meeting for the Georgetown Transportation Adv isory B oard and the Gov erning B ody of the City of Georgetown F ebruary 12, 2021 at 10:00 AM at Virtual T he C ity o f G eorgetown is c o mmitted to c ompliance with the Americans with Dis ab ilities Ac t (ADA). If yo u req uire as s is tanc e in participating at a p ublic meeting d ue to a disability, as d efined und er the ADA, reasonable as s is tance, ad ap tatio ns , or acc o mmo d ations will b e provid ed up o n req uest. P leas e contac t the C ity S ecretary's O ffic e, at leas t three (3) d ays p rio r to the s cheduled meeting date, at (512) 930-3652 or C ity Hall at 808 Martin Luther King Jr. S treet, G eo rgeto wn, T X 78626 for ad d itional info rmation; T T Y us ers route thro ugh R elay Texas at 711. C onsiste nt wi th Gove rnor Gre g A bbott’s suspension of vari ous pr ovisions of the O pe n M e eti ngs A c t, effe ctive A ugust 1, 2020 and until further notice , to r educ e the c hanc e of C O V I D -19 tr ansmi ssion, all C i ty of Geor getown A dvisor y B oard me etings will be hel d vir tually. P ubl ic c omme nt will be allowed via te le confe re nc e; no one wil l be allowed to appe ar i n per son. To participate, please co py and paste the fo llo wing weblink into yo ur bro wser: Weblink: J oin Zoom M ee ting https://ge or ge towntx.zoom.us/j/91577990676 M e eting I D : 915 7799 0676 O ne tap mobi le +13462487799,,91577990676# U S (H ouston) +12532158782,,91577990676# U S (Tac oma) D ial by your l ocati on +1 346 248 7799 U S (H ouston) +1 253 215 8782 U S (Tacoma) +1 669 900 6833 U S (S an J ose ) +1 301 715 8592 U S (Washington D C ) +1 312 626 6799 U S (C hic ago) +1 929 205 6099 U S (N ew Yor k) 833 548 0276 U S Toll-fr ee 833 548 0282 U S Toll-fr ee 877 853 5257 U S Toll-fr ee 888 475 4499 U S Toll-fr ee M e eting I D : 915 7799 0676 F ind your l ocal number : https://ge or getowntx.zoom.us/u/abowo F ZWO C Page 1 of 67 C itizen c omments ar e ac ce pte d in thr ee di ffer ent for mats: 1. Submi t wr itte n c omments to noah.koontz@ge orge town.or g by 3:00p.m. on the date of the mee ting and the R e c or di ng Se cr etar y wil l r ead your c omments into the re cor ding dur i ng the i tem that is be ing di sc usse d. 2. L og onto the me eti ng at the li nk above and “r aise your hand” dur ing the item 3. Use your home/mobile phone to cal l the toll-fre e number To join a Zoom mee ting, clic k on the l ink provided and joi n as an atte ndee . You will be asked to enter your name and email addr e ss (this is so we c an ide ntify you whe n you are call e d upon). To spe ak on an ite m, c li ck on the “Raise your H and” option at the bottom of the Zoom me e ti ng webpage onc e that ite m has ope ne d. When you ar e cal le d upon by the R ec ording S ec re tar y, your de vi c e wi ll be re mote ly un-muted by the A dmini str ator and you may spe ak for thr ee mi nutes. P le ase state your name clear l y, and whe n your time is over, your devic e will be mute d again. U se of pr ofani ty, thre atening l anguage, slande rous r e mar ks or thre ats of harm ar e not all owe d and will r e sult i n your being imme di atel y re moved from the me e ting. Regular Session (T his R egular S es s ion may, at any time, be rec es s ed to c o nvene an Exec utive S es s ion for any purp o s e authorized b y the O pen Meetings Ac t, Texas G o vernment C ode 551.) A C all to O rd er B Intro d uc tio n o f Bo ard Memb ers and Vis ito rs C Updates to various planning initiatives by C AMP O and T xDO T transp o rtatio n imp ro vement p ro jects as wells as an up d ate o n G o G eo O p erations . - R ay Miller, P ublic Wo rks Direc tor D Airport Monthly R ep o rt -- Joseph A. C arney, C .M., Airp o rt Manager E F ebruary 2021 G TAB Up d ates - Wes ley Wright, P.E., S ystems Engineering Directo r F T he C ity o f G eo rgeto wn participates in the the C ap itol Area C o uncil of G overnments (C AP C O G ) C entral Texas C lean Air C o alition (C AC ) program. - Will P aris h, Trans portation P lanning C o o rd inator L egislativ e Regular Agenda G C ons id eratio n and p o s s ib le ac tion to app ro ve the Minutes fro m the Novemb er 13, 2020 Meeting. -- No ah Koontz - Board Liais o n H C ons id eratio n and possible rec o mmend ation to award a c ontrac t to Yo ko Excavating, LLC of Belton, Texas for the 2020 C urb and G utter R ep lacement projec t and the 18t h S treet Drainage Improvement projec t, in the amount of $429,855.00 – Wes ley Wright, P.E., S ystems Engineering Directo r Page 2 of 67 Ce rtificate of Posting I, R obyn Dens mo re, C ity S ec retary for the C ity of G eorgetown, Texas, do hereb y certify that this Notice of Meeting was p o s ted at C ity Hall, 808 Martin Luther King Jr. S treet, G eorgeto wn, T X 78626, a p lace readily acc es s ib le to the general p ublic as req uired by law, on the _____ day of _________________, 2021, at __________, and remained so p o s ted fo r at leas t 72 c o ntinuo us hours prec eding the sc heduled time of s aid meeting. __________________________________ R o b yn Dens more, C ity S ecretary Page 3 of 67 City of Georgetown, Texas Transportation Advisory Board February 12, 2021 S UB J E C T: C all to O rd er IT E M S UMMARY: F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: NO NE S UB MIT T E D B Y: Emily Ko o ntz - Bo ard Liaison Page 4 of 67 City of Georgetown, Texas Transportation Advisory Board February 12, 2021 S UB J E C T: Up d ates to vario us p lanning initiatives b y C AMP O and T xDO T trans p o rtation improvement projec ts as wells as an update on G o G eo O peratio ns. - R ay Miller, P ub lic Works Direc to r IT E M S UMMARY: F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: N/A S UB MIT T E D B Y: R ay Miller, Jr., Ac ting Direc tor o f P ub lic Wo rks Page 5 of 67 City of Georgetown, Texas Transportation Advisory Board February 12, 2021 S UB J E C T: Airp o rt Monthly R eport -- Jo s ep h A. C arney, C .M., Airport Manager IT E M S UMMARY: Airp o rt R ep orts : o Taxiway Edge Lighting o O peratio ns R ep o rt o F uel S ales R eport o Hangar / Tie-Down Leas e R eport o F Y 2021 Acc o mp lis hments and P rojec ts o Avgas F uel P rice C o mp aris o n o Jet A F uel P ric e C omparison o Airport Mo nthly F inanc ial R eports o R espo ns e to Mr. Hutchinson re: New Airp o rt near F lo renc e w/up dated info rmation S TAF F R EC O MMEND AT I O N: No ne F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: No ne S UB MIT T E D B Y: Jo s ep h A. C arney, C .M. AT TAC H ME N T S: D escription Type Airport Covers heet Cover Memo Taxiway Edge Lighting Update Backup Material Airport Operations Report Backup Material Airport Fuel Sales Report Backup Material Airport Hangar Tie-Down Report Backup Material FY21 Accomplis hments Backup Material AvGas Fuel Price comparis on Backup Material JetA Fuel Price Comparis on Backup Material GTAB Monthly Finance Summary Backup Material Airport Financial Spreads heet Backup Material Res pons e about new airport Backup Material Page 6 of 67 GTAB Meeting Date: February 12, 2021 Item No. AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ SUBJECT: Airport Monthly Report – Joseph A. Carney, C.M., Airport Manager ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ITEM SUMMARY: Airport Reports: o Taxiway Edge Lighting o Operations Report o Fuel Sales Report o Hangar / Tie-Down Lease Report o FY 2021 Accomplishments and Projects o Avgas Fuel Price Comparison o Jet A Fuel Price Comparison o Airport Monthly Financial Reports o Response to Mr. Hutchinson re: New Airport near Florence w/updated information STAFF RECOMMENDATION: None FINANCIAL IMPACT: None COMMENTS: None ATTACHMENTS: Submitted By: Joseph A. Carney, Airport Manager Joseph A. Carney, C.M. Airport Manager Ray Miller, Jr. Director of Public Works Page 7 of 67 Airport Improvements Project No. 1914GRGTN February 2021 Project Description FY2018 project: Taxiway Edge Lighting Project Purpose Design and Install Taxiway Edge Lighting Project Project Estimate $1,287,562 Project Bid (F&W) $985,150 City Share $98,515 Project Engineer Garver Engineering Feb 2014 – GTAB consideration of project 1314GRGTN Preliminary Design for FY2014 project: Airfield Electrical Improvements. Aug 8, 2018 Georgetown Municipal Airport requests to use Garver as project engineer in letter to TxDOT May 29, 2019 TxDOT advises Garver that they can proceed with the Final Design for Project 1914GRGTN May 29, 2019 Pre Design/Design meeting at Georgetown Municipal Airport Conference room with Airport Manager, TxDOT, and Garver to go over time line for design and contract documents. June 14, 2019 GTAB consideration of project 1914GRGTN Taxiway Lighting Project. June 25, 2019 City Council approved project July 9, 2019 Meeting with TxDOT, Engineer Bid Estimate was $2,862,980.00 which is $1,575,418.00 over the CIP Budgeted amount. July 16, 2019 Meeting with TxDOT and Garver to discuss options for reducing cost. Page 8 of 67 July 30, 2019 Meeting with TxDOT and Garver to discuss proposal that will be submitted for final design. August 4 & 11, 2019 TxDOT will place ads in local newspapers for bids. August 30, 2019 Bid Opening at TxDOT, 4 companies submitted bids. The engineer of record, GarverUSA, is currently reviewing the bid documents for completeness and correctness. September 2019 There were 4 bids, one of which came in significantly under budget for the Base Bid. Garver Engineer was working with TxDOT to see if there was a possibility of pulling the PAPI lights for RWY 11/29 out of the additive alternate while staying under budget. TxDOT refused. Engineer is working on final work in conjunction with TxDOT. October 29, 2019 TELCON 10/31/19 with Garver, F&W. TxDOT and Airport. Contract will be fully executed 11/1/19 between TxDOT and F&W for the Taxiway Lighting Project (1914GEORG). There will be walk through 11/13/19 with all parties to get an eyes-on look and discuss phasing ideas. November 12, 2019 Executed contract between TxDOT and F&W Electrical. November 13, 2019 Notice to Proceed given to GarverUSA for construction phase November 13, 2019 Notice to Procure given to F&W to start gathering necessary parts and tools. December 16, 2019 F&W Started to preposition equipment and materials. January 6, 2020 F&W Started construction. Working from North to South. February 25, 2020 Work on Twy A btwn the threshold RWY 18 and TWY J is complete along the west side. Complete to TWY E on the east side. Work complete TWY L from TWY G to threshold RWY 36. March 6, 2020 Work on TWY L south of RWY 11/29 complete except marking signs. Work is progressing on TWY F between TWY L and TWY A and should be complete by March 9, 2020. Anticipated work on TWY A and the west side of Terminal Ramp to begin March 6, 2020. May 2020 Work was stopped due to supply system hold up: Sign faces and ALCMS hardware/software. July/August 2020 Sign faces arrived at F&W. ALCMS will be upgraded on August 11 remotely and via local hands-on with F&W Techs. Final punch-list items will be completed by F&W in this time period. Areas left to complete: 1. All dirt work to include topsoil, grass seeding and gravel/rock removal. 2. Missing sign faces Project timeline overruns This has been asked of TxDOT. TxDOT would be the agency that processes the penalties against F&W, who then could process penalties against any of the sub- contractors. Page 9 of 67 September/October 2020 F&W working on final dirt work, filling in low spots with clean fill and establishing correct grade around light/sing bases. Seeding all dirt with clean field grass seed. October 23 GarverUSA hosted a “Lessons Learned” meeting with TxDOT, Garver, Airport Staff, and City Representative. October 30 GarverUSA sent email to F&W concerning final wrap up of the punch list items. December 30 As of this date F&W has not come back to complete the punch list items. TxDOT and GarverUSA are working with F&W to complete project. January 25 F&W is working to get last punchlist items completed, they are running into staffing issues as COVID-19 is affecting the personnel available to send. Projected timeline • Construction phase – January - March • Closeout Phase - 68 days post construction o Significant Completion Date is March 14, 2020 • At last count there were 9 weather days accrued Page 10 of 67 Georgetown Municipal Airport Contract Tower Program Update Operations for Month of January 2020 YEAR TO DATE YEAR TO DATE 2020 2021 COUNT %2020 2021 COUNT % IFR 829 713 -116 -16%3483 3863 380 9.8% VFR 3557 3922 365 9%14706 16464 1758 10.7% LOCAL 4705 4448 -257 -6%20069 20116 47 0.2% TOTAL 9091 9083 -8 -0.1%38258 40443 2185 5.4% KGTU OPERATIONS FOR THE MONTH OF: JANUARY TAKEOFF/L ANDING MONTHLY NUMBERS PREVIOUS/CURRENT YR PREVIOUS/CURRENT YR *This does not include flyover operations (i.e. handoffs from ABIA approach/departure control to KGTU tower then onto the next ATC. Page 11 of 67 Georgetown Municipal Airport Fuel Sales Update For Month of January 2020 YEAR TO DATE YEAR TO DATE 2019 2020 2019 2020 GALLONS % AVGAS 28,959 29,057 123,833 131,583 7,750 6.3% JET A 32,381 34,283 146,287 159,571 13,284 8.3% TOTALS 61,340 63,340 270,120 291,154 21,034 7.2% FUEL REPORT FOR MONTH OF: JANUARY GALLONS SOLD FOR MONTH CHANGE PREVIOUS/CURRENT YRTYPE OF FUEL Page 12 of 67 Airport Hangar / Tie-Down Lease Update January 2021 Project Description Hangar / Tie-Down Lease Agreements Purpose Occupancy Rates Unit Stats Total T-Hangars – 130 • 128 Occupied • 2 Vacant Anticipated Time on Waitlist for most recent listee • 5 years, 8 Months • 308 persons on list Total Storage Units – 16 • 11 Occupied • 5 Vacant Total Tie-Downs – 39 Monthly, 8 for Overnight/Transient Parking • 34 Monthly Occupied • 4 Monthly Vacant • 1 as last resort due to location T-Hangars Storage Hangars Tie-Downs Total Total 130 16 39 185 Occupied 128 11 34 173 93.51%Percentage Occupied Page 13 of 67 GTU Airport FY 2021 In-Work Projects Develop Airport Preventative Maintenance Program. Ongoing Wildlife Hazard Assessment completed by Lou Bridges with Mead & Hunt. Draft at City Attorney’s Office for review Upgrade to bi-fold door drive motors in Hangars BB & CC. On Hold – COVID-19 Install roller poppers in Hangar I Parts on Hand RFP for new fuel contract At Purchasing and prep for release. Work with outside Attorney for FAA Part 13 response. Started in May 2020, Notice from FAA re a Part 13 investigation about Fuel Pricing. Planned Projects Obtaining Pesticide Application License to allow for airport staff to spray state regulated chemicals. Replace broken fence along Lakeway Drive. Replace HVAC units in AeroJet Center hangar. Install chain link fence around Tower. Update tower communications equipment. Convert lights in Hangars E, F, and G to LED. Convert lights in CTA hangar to LED. Spray seal asphalt pavement at north side of AeroJet Center hangar. Spray seal asphalt pavement at Hangars H, I, and J. Crack seal asphalt pavement at CTA hangar. Page 14 of 67 Install cattle guard at south gate. Install decorative rock around AST and oil recovery tank fences. Accomplishments Rekeyed all locks in the Air Traffic Control Tower (ATCT) for added security and to simplify the number of access keys needed. The locks have not been changed since the ATCT’s opening in 2007. Added a magnetic dry erase whiteboard to the north wall of the Airport Conference Room. Repainted Airport Manager’s Office and Communication Room in Terminal building. Installed rain diverters to tin covered walkway in front of Terminal entrance. Removed vegetation and installed predator wire on fence south of runway 11/29 for wildlife management. Tree and brush removal completed at Genesis. Inspected roof insulation in CTA hangar. No repair needed. Installed timer switches in Hangar I. Installed lending library bookcase in terminal conference room. Inspected door rollers on Genesis hangar. No replacement needed. Installed tv/monitor for use in Airport Conference Room. Installed gun cabinet in maintenance shop for wildlife management. Installed folding wall desk for laptop use with tv/monitor in Airport Conference Room. Replaced 48 skylights on AeroJet Center’s east hangar roof. Repaired leaking roof above Hangar C-4. Replaced HVAC units in CTA hangar. Laid asphalt millings around Runway 36 PAPIs and Runway 11/29 threshold end lights. Poured three concrete dumpster pads. Two at Genesis hangar and one at CTA hangar. Page 15 of 67 Installed network wiring in Airport Conference Room for phone and PC while IT Department procured the equipment. Replace water heaters in CTA hangar. Remove vegetation and install predator wire on fence near Genesis hangar. Replace gutter and dilapidated panels on side of CTA hangar. Repair failed ramp at Genesis hangar. Updated Texas Agriculture Weights & Measures Certificate/License Repave Terminal Drive with new asphalt. Paint CTA hangar. AvFuel Fuel Contract Extension. Tree and brush removal at retention pond drainage area. Airport fuel rate study. Replace bottom door seals on Hangars H, I, J, and TT. Upgrade cable guides with roller poppers in Hangar H. Airport lease rate study. 502 Wright Brothers Drive Land Lease CAP Lease for TT Hangar with rate reduction 2021 Budget Tower Alarm Install Tower CAB computer monitor replacement Fuel System Maintenance Contract Page 16 of 67 1533 users online Airport / FBO 100LL $3.30—$6.70 average $4.40 Georgetown Municipal Airport Georgetown, TX FS $5.00 $4.90 GUARANTEED City of Georgetown Terminal SS $3.60 29-Jan update AeroJet Center FS $5.00 GUARANTEED 14 ESE Taylor Municipal Airport Taylor, TX Taylor Municipal Airport Avfuel SS $3.40 20-Jan update 18 SSE Austin Exec Airport Austin, TX SS $4.50 FS $5.60 26-Jan update 18 SW Lago Vista TX - Rusty Allen Airport Lago Vista, TX Lago Vista Airport independent SS $3.30 25-Jan update 24 N Skylark Field Airport Killeen, TX Flight Line Services Avfuel SS $3.35 28-Jan update 25 SW Lakeway Airpark Lakeway, TX Lakeway Airpark SS $3.99 27-Jan update 26 WSW Spicewood Airport Spicewood, TX Spicewood Pilots Association, Inc SS $3.75 30-Jan update Airports Navaids Airspace Fixes Aviation Fuel Hotels iPhone App My AirNav AirNav: Fuel prices near Georgetown Municipal Airport http://airnav.com/fuel/local.html 1 of 3 2/1/2021, 3:25 PM Page 17 of 67 29 S Austin-Bergstrom International Airport Austin, TX FS $6.55 01-Feb update FS $6.50 GUARANTEED Signature Flight Support independent FS $6.70 29-Jan update 29 W Burnet Municipal Airport-Kate Craddock Field Burnet, TX Faulkner's Air Shop Avfuel SS $3.50 FS $4.00 28-Jan update 32 NNE Draughon-Miller Central Texas Regional Airport Temple, TX General Aviation Terminal SS $3.74 FS $4.12 28-Jan update 36 E H H Coffield Regional Airport Rockdale, TX City of Rockdale AS $3.80 29-Jan update 36 WSW Horseshoe Bay Resort Airport Horseshoe Bay, TX Horseshoe Bay Resort Jet Center EPIC FS $5.49 20-Jan update 37 NW Lampasas Airport Lampasas, TX City of Lampasas (FBO)SS $3.50 GUARANTEED 45 N Gatesville Municipal Airport Gatesville, TX City of Gatesville independent SS $3.80 20-Jan update 47 SE Smithville Crawford Municipal Airport Smithville, TX Fayette Aero LLC Avfuel SS $4.32 29-Jan update 47 SE Giddings-Lee County Airport Giddings, TX Sills Aviation Services LLC SS $3.42 22-Jan update 48 SSW San Marcos Regional Airport Austin, TX SS $4.37 FS $5.37 01-Feb update 50 S Lockhart Municipal Airport Lockhart, TX Martin & Martin Aviation Avfuel SS $3.80 28-Jan update AirNav: Fuel prices near Georgetown Municipal Airport http://airnav.com/fuel/local.html 2 of 3 2/1/2021, 3:25 PM Page 18 of 67 Copyright © AirNav, LLC. All rights reserved.Privacy Policy Contact AirNav: Fuel prices near Georgetown Municipal Airport http://airnav.com/fuel/local.html 3 of 3 2/1/2021, 3:25 PM Page 19 of 67 1551 users online Airport / FBO Jet A $2.60—$6.35 average $4.56 Georgetown Municipal Airport Georgetown, TX FS $4.62 $4.52 GUARANTEED AeroJet Center FS $4.62 GUARANTEED 14 ESE Taylor Municipal Airport Taylor, TX Taylor Municipal Airport Avfuel SS $2.60 20-Jan update 18 SSE Austin Exec Airport Austin, TX FS $5.43 26-Jan update 24 N Skylark Field Airport Killeen, TX Flight Line Services Avfuel SS $3.45 FS $4.15 28-Jan update 25 NNW Robert Gray Army Airfield Fort Hood (Killeen), TX Killeen-Fort Hood Regional Airport FS $4.15 29-Dec-2020 update 29 S Austin-Bergstrom International Airport Austin, TX FS $6.27 01-Feb update FS $6.28 GUARANTEED Signature Flight Support independent FS $6.35 29-Jan update Airports Navaids Airspace Fixes Aviation Fuel Hotels iPhone App My AirNav AirNav: Fuel prices near Georgetown Municipal Airport http://airnav.com/fuel/local.html 1 of 2 2/1/2021, 3:24 PM Page 20 of 67 29 W Burnet Municipal Airport-Kate Craddock Field Burnet, TX Faulkner's Air Shop Avfuel FS $3.99 SS $3.99 28-Jan update 32 NNE Draughon-Miller Central Texas Regional Airport Temple, TX General Aviation Terminal SS $3.94 FS $4.32 28-Jan update 36 WSW Horseshoe Bay Resort Airport Horseshoe Bay, TX Horseshoe Bay Resort Jet Center EPIC FS $4.99 20-Jan update 47 SE Giddings-Lee County Airport Giddings, TX Sills Aviation Services LLC SS $3.70 22-Jan update 48 SSW San Marcos Regional Airport Austin, TX FS $4.73 01-Feb update Copyright © AirNav, LLC. All rights reserved.Privacy Policy Contact AirNav: Fuel prices near Georgetown Municipal Airport http://airnav.com/fuel/local.html 2 of 2 2/1/2021, 3:24 PM Page 21 of 67 F GTAB Report GTAB MONTHLY REPORT AS OF JANUARY 31, 2020 Operating revenues include fuel sales, leases, and all other revenue. During the month of January operating revenues totaled $195,097. Fuel is the largest revenue stream in the fund and represents 72.4% of budgeted operating revenues. Through the month, fuel sales total 30.9% of the fuel budget. Fuel sales are tracked every month by staff and are part of the Airport’s performance metrics. Lease and rental revenues are the second largest stream of income for the Airport. It represents 26.2% of budgeted operating revenues. Through the period, lease and rental revenue totals $264,429 or 29.2% of budgeted lease and rental revenues. Occupancy rates continue to be strong. The stated goal per the Airport performance management program is to have occupancy rates over 90%. In fiscal year 2021, the Airport has on a monthly basis continued to meet this goal. Operating expenses include personnel costs, airport operations, ongoing capital maintenance, and fuel for resale. Airport operating expenses total budget is $3,921,513. Year to date personnel expenses total $147,167, or 34.3% of budget. The City has experienced 9 of 26 pay periods through this period, or 33.3% of total cycles. Other airport operational related expenses include internal service and administrative allocation charges, which total expensed monthly and totals $1,038,013 through January 31st. Budgeted CIP maintenance expense total $354,067. Ongoing CIP maintenance include a 10% match for TxDOT for ongoing an ongoing construction grant, building and asphaltic maintenance, as well as miscellaneous equipment. Fuel related expenses are comprised of year to date spending plus the fuel encumbrance. Year to date spending totals $582,758 through the month. A $2.1 million encumbrance for fuel was established at the beginning of the fiscal year with $1,533,916 remaining as of January 31st. Throughout the fiscal year, the encumbrance amount will be reduced as the year to date spend amount increases. Non-operating revenues budget includes a total of $700,500 for Bond Proceeds for the year. This is the amount of bond proceeds issued for Airport CIP projects in FY2021. Non-operating expenses have a total budget of $908,931, year to date no spending has been done. The Airport will use $750,000 for CIP project Airport Maintenance Facility. The remaining budget amount of $158,931 is for the debt service payment that will be made in the spring. 69.1% 30.9% Operating Revenue -Fuel & Terminal Sales Approved Budget Year to Date (w/Encumberance) - 500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 Oct-20 Nov-20 Dec-20 Jan-21 Fuel Encumbrance and Fuel Revenue Fuel: Encumbrances Fuel Expense: Actuals Fuel Revenue: Actuals Page 22 of 67 Airport Operations Fund Report Draft Period FY2021 - JAN Ledger Account Approved Budget Current Period Year To Date w/Encumbrance Variance % Variance Beginning Fund Balance 1,428,114 - 1,428,114 - 100.00% Operating Revenue Fuel and Terminal Sales 2,502,000 165,672 772,138 (1,729,862) 30.86% Interest and Other 47,500 - (57,018) (104,518) -120.04% Grant Revenue - - - - 0.00% Leases and Rentals 906,500 29,425 264,429 (642,071) 29.17% Operating Revenue Total 3,456,000 195,097 979,550 (2,476,450) 28.34% Operating Expenditures Operations-Fuel 2,100,000 131,458 2,116,674 (16,674) 100.79% Operations-Non Fuel 1,038,013 64,082 1,549,056 (511,043) 149.23% Personnel 429,433 49,300 147,167 282,266 34.27% CIP Maintenance Expense 354,067 - 13,606 340,461 3.84% Operating Expenditures Total 3,921,513 244,839 3,826,503 95,010 97.58% Total Net Operations (465,513) (49,742) (2,846,953) (2,381,440) 611.57% Non-Operating Revenue Bond Proceeds 700,500 3 16 (700,484) 0.00% Non-Operating Revenue Total 700,500 3 16 (700,484) 0.00% Non-Operating Expenditures CIP Expense 750,000 - - 750,000 0.00% Debt Service 105,313 - - 105,313 0.00% Interest Expense 53,618 - - 53,618 0.00% Non-Operating Expenditure Total 908,931 - - 908,931 0.00% Total Net Non-Operations (208,431) 3 16 208,447 -0.01% Excess (Deficiency) of Total Revenue over Total Requirements (673,944) (49,739) (2,846,937) (2,172,993) 422.43% Ending Fund Balance 754,170 (49,739) (1,418,823) (2,172,993)-188.13% Reserves Contingency Reserve 332,917 - 332,917 - 100.00% Debt Service Reserve 141,478 - 141,478 - 100.00% Total Reserved Fund Balance 474,395 - 474,395 - 100.00% Available Fund Balance 279,775 (49,739) (1,893,218) (2,172,993) -676.69% Page 23 of 67 1 MEMORANDUM TO: Georgetown Transportation Advisory Board Members FROM: Joseph A. Carney, C.M.., Airport Manager SUBJECT: Airport Construction Near Florence – Question raised by Bryan Hutchinson 11/13/20 DATE: December 30, 2020 – updated January 25, 2021 In the November GTAB meeting Mr. Hutchinson asked about the impact a new airport, that is being built near Florence TX, would have on our operations. Background Information To answer this question, we need to be able to quantify who, what, where, and when. 1. Who – this is an unknown? I reached out to the Florence City Hall. They stated that they have no information about any airport development in their jurisdiction. Their jurisdiction is all EJT and encompasses a 10-mile ring. 2. What – Airport construction. Mr. Hutchinson stated th at it was going to be approximately 284 acres and have approximately 200+/- buildings. We do not know what kind of buildings; small, medium, or large box hangars, corporate hangars, and t-hangars. 3. Where – Florence and within 10 miles of center of town. a. FLF Gliderport – Briggs Texas – Private – 4,500 Turf b. Fisher Ranch – Killeen Texas – Private – 2,400 Turf c. Keno Field – Andice Texas – Private – 1,537 Turf d. Rab Ranch Airport – Andice Texas – Private – 1,600 Turf e. Britts Crosswind – Liberty Hill Texas – Private – 2,638 Turf f. Flying K Airport – Briggs Texas – Private 2,300 Turf 4. I researched this information as well as calling Florence City Hall. I also reached out to the planning commission at Williamson County, Mr. Adam Boatright, who said that he is not familiar with any airport development, but that is getting with his staff to see if anyone else has any knowledge. Assumptions and conclusions With this information I could only give very broad, general responses. 1. This new airport would probably be as impactful as the Salado Airport is, and we do not see any impact at all. Being a private airport, they can sell their ‘lots’, or have them in very lengthy land leases (over 40-year lengths that the Texas Statute has as a max length for public airports). These prices would be far more than most GA pilots are willing to Page 24 of 67 2 put out. Salado Airport’s price range is $57K - $119K for the lot, with a total of 72 lots available. 2. Fuel sales would probably be negligible as we get our fuel using a multiyear contract system that allows us to purchase our fuel at a discount. This discount is based on volume and a small airport would not have the same volume. 3. Surfaces used are different as well. Our runway is asphalt, designed to accept the loads of large business jets, where the listed airports are all turf runways. Any jet would avoid turf, and most GA pilots would prefer to use an asphalt or concrete runway. Also, most aircraft with a short stature would not want to land on turf to avoid the possibility of a propeller strike. Such an event would be very expensive. 4. Size of the airport would also play a part. 284 acres is about ½ the size of Georgetown Municipal Airport (KGTU) and there may not be room to expand depending on the surrounding topography and neighbors. In summary While a new airport may look inviting, most pilots would either stay here at KGTU, or if they did go to this new airport, or even Salado Airport, they would probably purchase fuel at another airport. That fuel purchase would depend on distance to fuel, cost of fuel, and ease of fueling. Cost of the lot and then the cost of building a hangar would be a large pill to swallow. I believe that our airport will still be the premier airport in the Central Texas Region. We are fiscally responsible, showing a positive rate in our budgets. We are continuing to attract pilots and aircraft who want to fly here and to position their aircraft here. We are working with private developers to see if we cannot build hangars in an area due east of Airport Road, and to an area to the south of Fire Station #4. January 25, 2021 I spoke with Larry Wood, Aerojet Center, on Thursday January 21, 2021. He informed me that he and some investors were looking to build an airpark, not airport, outside of town along Highway 29. This airpark would have, an approximately 3,500-foot lighted grass runway and lots for houses/hangars. There would be NO fuel sales and because it is a grass strip only general aviation aircraft would typically use it. There would be no impact to KGTU operations or hangar need. The aircraft at the new airpark would need to go to an airport to refuel, and due to our proximity we would be the fuel station of choice. Page 25 of 67 City of Georgetown, Texas Transportation Advisory Board February 12, 2021 S UB J E C T: F eb ruary 2021 G TAB Updates - Wesley Wright, P.E., S ys tems Engineering Direc tor IT E M S UMMARY: F M 971 - Realignment at Austin Avenue: T xDO T review fro m district offic e met 100% p lans Klo tz s ubmitted. Enviro nmental complete and s ubmitted. Utility relo cates to be completed o uts id e of this projec t. C has co is und erway with Utility relo cates . Utility relo cates c omplete in the p ark finalizing North s id e of R O W F inal p arcel preparing fo r c lo s ing Northwest B lvd: Utility work complete S ub G rade prep complete base course underway. B eam set complete, B ridge bent caps complete, along with panel placement East M S E complete, West M S E complete Deck pour scheduled for first part of J anuary Estimated completion S pring 21. S outhwestern B lvd: P reliminary alignment revised P erforming H ydrologic and Hydraulic calculations R O W needs forwarded to T ravis S E Inner Loop: C o nstruc tion is underway o n the no rths id e o f the exis ting S E Inner lo o p . C ontrac tor working on S ub grad e and d rainage. 2020 Curb and Gutter Bid O pening held o n Dec. 14th. Yoko Excavating low qualified bidder. G TAB to c o nsider o n F eb ruary 12th fo llo wed by C ity C o uncil o n F eb ruary 23rd. Rock S idewalk / F Y20 Downtown AD A sidewalk Improvements F inalizing d es ign with P arks and F acilities dep artments . Wo rking o n ad vertis ing and b id d ing sc hedule for F eb ruary. 2021 Signal Improvements P ro ject in des ign for s ignal ins tallatio n at Williams & Es trella, S hell R d & Verde Vis ta and S E Inner Lo op @ R o ckrid e Lane. S urvey wo rk is being comp leted. 2021 Intersection P edestrian S afety Enhancements Des ign and survey und erway for rectangular rapid flas h b eacons (R R F B) at the following loc ations . C o ol S p rings Way @ C owan C reek Amenity C enter, 5th S treet @ Austin Ave., 8 th S treet @ Lib rary (new Page 26 of 67 p arking lo t) and Indus trial Ave @ G MC remote parking lot. S H 29 Access Improvements – traffic signal C o ntracto r has c ompleted boring o f c o nduit on all 4 corners of the intersec tio n. 2021 High P erformance P avement Seal P roject #1 C urrently und er des ign. Area includ ed in the projec t is S un C ity 2021 High P erformance P avement Seal P roject #2 C urrently und er des ign. Areas includ ed in the projec t are Berry C reek, Q uail Valley, P leasant Valley and G atlin C reek neighb o rhoods. 2021 HIP R project C urrently und er des ign. Areas includ ed in the projec t are wes t o ld to wn and R eata Trails sub d ivisions . F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: N/A S UB MIT T E D B Y: C hris P o usso n AT TAC H ME N T S: D escription Type February 2021 GTAB project updates Pres entation Page 27 of 67 February 2021 GTAB Updates Cover Sheet FM 971 - Realignment at Austin Avenue: TxDOT review from district office met 100% plans Klotz submitted. Environmental complete and submitted. Utility relocates to be completed outside of this project. Chasco is underway with Utility relocates. Utility relocates complete in the park finalizing North side of ROW Final parcel preparing for closing Northwest Blvd: • Utility work complete • Sub Grade prep complete base course underway. • Beam set complete, Bridge bent caps complete, along with panel placement • East MSE complete, West MSE complete • Deck pour scheduled for first part of January • Estimated completion Spring 21. Southwestern Blvd: • Preliminary alignment revised • Performing Hydrologic and Hydraulic calculations • ROW needs forwarded to Travis SE Inner Loop: Construction is underway on the northside of the existing SE Inner loop. Contractor working on Subgrade and drainage work. 2020 Curb and Gutter Bid Opening held on Dec. 14th. Yoko Excavating low qualified bidder. GTAB to consider on February 12th followed by City Council on February 23rd. Rock Sidewalk / FY20 Downtown ADA sidewalk Improvements Finalizing design with Parks and Facilities departments. Working on advertising and bidding schedule for February. Page 28 of 67 2021 Signal Improvements Project in design for signal installation at Williams & Estrella, Shell Rd & Verde Vista and SE Inner Loop @ Rockride Lane. Survey work is being completed. 2021 Intersection Pedestrian Safety Enhancements Design and survey underway for rectangular rapid flash beacons (RRFB) at the following locations. Cool Springs Way @ Cowan Creek Amenity Center, 5th Street @ Austin Ave., 8th Street @ Library (new parking lot) and Industrial Ave @ GMC remote parking lot. SH 29 Access Improvements – traffic signal Contractor has completed boring of conduit on all 4 corners of the intersection. 2021 High Performance Pavement Seal Project #1 Currently under design. Area included in the project is Sun City 2021 High Performance Pavement Seal Project #2 Currently under design. Areas included in the project are Berry Creek, Quail Valley, Pleasant Valley and Gatlin Creek neighborhoods. 2021 HIPR project Currently under design. Areas included in the project are west old town and Reata Trails subdivisions. Page 29 of 67 FM 971 at Austin Avenue Realignment Intersection Improvements Project No. 1BZ TIP No. AG February 2021 Project Description Design and preparation of final plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E) for the widening and realignment of FM 971 at Austin Avenue, eastward to Gann Street. Purpose To provide a new alignment consistent with the alignment of the proposed Northwest Boulevard Bridge over IH 35; to allow a feasible, alternate route from the west side of I 35 to Austin Avenue, to Georgetown High School, to San Gabriel Park and a more direct route to SH 130. Project Managers Joel Weaver Engineer Klotz Associates, Inc. Element Status / Issues Design TxDOT review from district office met 100% plans Klotz submitted. Environmental complete and submitted. Utility relocates to be completed outside of this project. Chasco is underway with Utility relocates. Estimated bid June of 2021 Environmental/ Archeological TBD Rights of Way Final parcel preparing for closing Utility Relocations TBD Construction Utility relocation in the park complete finalizing North side of ROW Other Issues AFA with TxDOT complete. Page 30 of 67 Northwest Boulevard (Fontana Drive to Austin Avenue) Project No. 5QX TIP No. AF February 2021 Project Description Construction of overpass and surface roads to connect Northwest Boulevard with Austin Avenue and FM 971. Purpose This project will relieve congestion at the Austin Avenue/Williams Drive intersection and provide a more direct access from the west side of IH 35 corridor to Georgetown High School and SH 130 via FM 971. Project Manager Joel Weaver and Wesley Wright, P.E. Engineer Klotz Associates Element Status / Issues Design Design Complete Environmental/ Archeological Complete Rights of Way ROW Documents are being finalized. All offers have been made. 8 Parcels required. 5 acquired, 1 in closing, 2 in condemnation. Utility Relocations TBD Construction • Utility work complete • Sub Grade prep complete base course underway. • Beam set complete, Bridge bent caps complete, along with panel placement • East and West approach MSE complete, North ROW MSE 90% • Deck complete, rail steel tie underway, • East and West approach pours complete in January • Estimated completion Spring 21. Other Issues Page 31 of 67 Page 32 of 67 Widening of: SE Inner Loop - FM 1460 to Austin Avenue Roadway & Southwestern Boulevard – Raintree Drive to SE Inner Loop Roadway February 2021 Project Description FM 1460 to Austin Avenue Roadway Widening Project & Southwestern Boulevard – Raintree Drive to SE Inner Loop Roadway Widening Project (See Attached Exhibit C). The professional services will consist of providing final roadway, drainage, water, wastewater, incidental designs, as well as, utility coordination, ROW support, environmental phase I investigations, archeological investigations, geotechnical investigations, ROW & Temporary Construction Easement (TCE) metes and bounds documents, bidding documents, bidding services, and construction administration services. Project Managers Joel Weaver and Wesley Wright, P.E. Engineer KPA & Associates Element Status / Issues Design Southwestern: • Preliminary alignment revised • Performing Hydrologic and Hydraulic calculations • ROW needs forwarded to Travis SE Inner Loop: Subgrade and drainage work underway. Culvert extension North side complete First area base install complete Environmental/ Archeological Efforts to begin April 2019 and any issues are expected to be identified in the coming month. Rights of Way ROW needs on Southwestern to be determined Total Parcels: 0 Possession: 0 Pending: 0 Utility Relocations To be determined Construction Other Issues None. Page 33 of 67 Page 34 of 67 2020 Curb and Gutter Project No. PRJ000024 TIP No. None February 2021 Project Description Design and preparation of final plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E) and construction administration for curb and gutter replacements on Meadowbrook Drive, Oakland Drive and Ridge Oak Drive. Purpose This project consists of removing and replacing old curb and gutter that do not properly drain storm water and prematurely damage streets. Project Managers Chris Pousson Engineer Contractor KPA TBD Element Status / Issues Design Design is complete. Environmental/ Archeological N/A Rights of Way N/A Utility Relocations None Bid Phase Project is advertised. Bid Opening held on December 15th, 2020. Yoko Excavating LLC low qualified bidder. GTAB to consider award on February 12th, , following GTAB approval, Council to consider on February 23rd. Construction TBD Other Issues Page 35 of 67 Citywide Sidewalk Improvements Project Rock Sidewalk / FY 20 Downtown ADA Improvements Project No. PRJ000138 TIP No. None February 2021 Project Description The proposed project consists of the rehabilitation and installation of pedestrian facilities along several streets on Rock Street between 8th and 7th and Downtown ADA Sidewalk Improvements. Various methods of rehabilitating existing non- compliant sidewalks will be considered. This project requires coordination with TCEQ and TDLR and all proposed pedestrian elements will be ADA compliant with the Texas Accessibility Standards (TAS). Purpose To provide ADA/TDLR compliant sidewalks and ramps identified in the 2015 Sidewalk Master Plan . Project Managers Chris Pousson Engineer Contractor KPA TBD Element Status / Issues Design Finalizing design with Facilities and Park departments. Submitting TCEQ WPAP Exception. Tentative to bid February. Environmental/ Archeological TBD Rights of Way / Easements Will require a couple Temporary Construction easement. Utility Relocations TBD Construction TBD Other Issues Page 36 of 67 Signal Improvements – Various Locations Project No. PRJ000214 TIP No. None Unchanged - February 2021 Project Description Design and preparation of Plans, Specifications, Estimate, Bidding Documents and construction phase services for the construction of signal improvements for the intersections of Williams Drive & Estrella Crossing, Shell Road & Verde Vista and SE Inner Loop & Rockride Lane. Purpose To better manage traffic movements at the intersection. Project Manager Engineer KPA Element Status / Issues Design Design underway for Williams and Estrella intersection. Surveying All locations being surveyed. Environmental/ Archeological TBD Rights of Way TBD Utility Relocations TBD Construction TBD Other Issues None Page 37 of 67 2021 Intersection Pedestrian Safety Enhancements Project No. PRJ000215 TIP No. None Unchanged - February 2021 Project Description Design and preparation of Plans, Specifications, Estimate, Bidding Documents and construction phase services for the construction of intersection pedestrian safety enhancements at the intersections of Cool Springs Way @ Cowan Creek Amenity Center, 5th Street @ Austin Ave, 7th Street @ Library (new parking lot) and Industrial Ave @ GMC remote parking lot. Purpose To enhance pedestrian safety at intersections with push button activated rapid flashing beacons to alert drivers of pedestrian presence. Project Manager Chris Pousson Engineer KPA Element Status / Issues Design Design underway. Surveying All locations being surveyed. Environmental/ Archeological TBD Rights of Way TBD Utility Relocations TBD Construction TBD Other Issues None Page 38 of 67 SH 29 Access Improvements – Traffic Signal Project No. TIP No. None February 2021 Project Description Design and preparation of Plans, Specifications, Estimate, Bidding Documents and construction phase services for the proposed corridor improvements along SH-29-Unversity Avenue between IH35 and Scenic Drive including a right-turn deceleration lane, auxiliary lane, median improvements, drainage improvements and traffic signal relocation. Purpose To better manage traffic movements at the intersection. Project Manager Joel Weaver Engineer Kimely-Horn and Associates. Inc. Signal Relocation Element Status / Issues Design Design is complete Surveying Survey is complete Environmental/ Archeological Rights of Way Utility Relocations TBD Construction Subgrade electrical installed, concrete flatwork underway All poles with Mast arms installed, appurtenances installed week of 1-25 Other Issues None Page 39 of 67 2021 Street Maintenance Project No. PRJ000211 / PRJ000212 TIP No. None Unchanged - February 2021 Project Description Purpose 2021 CIP Maintenance project consist of furnishing and installing approximately 230,000 square yards of high performance pavement seal (PMM) and approximately 190,000 square yards of high performance pavement seal (HA5) traffic control, and miscellaneous striping in Sun City, Berry Creek, Gatlin Creek, Reata Trails, Quail Valley and Pleasant valley neighborhoods. To provide protection and maintain an overall pavement condition index of 85% Project Manager Chris Pousson Engineer/Engineers KPA, LP Task Status / Issues High performance pavement seal Package #1 (PMM) Engineering is underway. Bidding to be determined. High performance pavement seal Package #2 (HA5) Engineering is underway. Bidding to be determined. Page 40 of 67 Project: 20121 Street Maintenance Hot In Place Recycling (HIPR) Project# PRJ000210 January 2021 Project Description: This project will consist of furnishing an installing approximately 115,000 square yards of hot-in-place asphalt recycling, edge milling, adjustment of water valves and manholes, tree pruning, traffic control and miscellaneous striping. Purpose: The purpose of this project is to maintain high Pavement Condition Indices (PCI) by Hot-In-Place asphalt recycling within the City Street Maintenance Program Project Manager: Joel Weaver Engineer: KPA Contractor: TBD Phase Start Finish Status / Comments Preliminary Engineering October 2020 January 2021 In design. ROW / Easements N/A N/A Bid / Award Bid # TBD TBD Construction TBD TBD Post Construction Page 41 of 67 City of Georgetown, Texas Transportation Advisory Board February 12, 2021 S UB J E C T: T he C ity o f G eorgetown p artic ip ates in the the C apito l Area C ounc il of G o vernments (C AP C O G ) C entral Texas C lean Air C oalitio n (C AC ) pro gram. - Will P arish, Transportatio n P lanning C oordinator IT E M S UMMARY: C AC is a voluntary, uninc o rp o rated as s o ciation, the purp o s e of which is to dis c us s b es t p ractices related to air quality. C AC fac ilitates in the develo p ment, ad o p tion, and implementatio n o f c lean air p lans to maintain compliance with federal o zo ne s tand ard s in Bas tro p , C ald well, Hays , Travis , and Williams o n C o unties. In Dec emb er o f 2020, the Enviro nmental P rotec tio n Agenc y (E PA) c o nc lud ed its periodic review o f the p artic ulate matter (P M) Natio nal Ambient Air Q uality S tand ard s and dec ided not to amend the current s tand ard s . Ho wever, EPA S taff had recommend ed c ons id eration of tighter standards for fine p artic ulate matter. And it is possible during the next review in 2025, that a new EPA Adminis trato r c ould increase the particulate matter standard s . T herefo re, the C entral Texas C lean Air C o alitio n (C AC ) has dec id ed to update the region’s voluntary air q uality p lan to inc lud e additio nal meas ures targeted at reducing regional P M2.5 air p o llutio n and enhanc ing awarenes s of P M air p o llutio n. Includ ed in the pac ket yo u will find the rec ommend ed additio nal p ro p o s ed meas ures that the C lean Air C o alition Advis o ry C o mmittee (C AC AC ) is rec ommend ing participants co ns ider in o rd er to help reduce fine p artic ulate matter pollution. F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: No ne req uired , this rec o mmendatio ns are voluntary. S UB MIT T E D B Y: AT TAC H ME N T S: D escription Type CACAC Update Pres entation Exhibit CACAC Update Packet Exhibit Page 42 of 67 Proposed Particulate Matter Reduction Measures Page 43 of 67 •In December 2020, the EPA concluded its periodic review of the particulate matter (PM) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). o Decided to retain All existing PM NAAQS o However, as part of this review, EPA Staff indicated that there is no clear threshold below which exposure to PM pollution will not cause significant health problems, o EPA Staff had recommended consideration of a tighter annual fine particulate matter (PM2.5) NAAQS. o During the next PM NAAQS review in 2025, the new EPA Administrator could easily decide that a tighter NAAQS is necessary ▪Therefore, the Central Texas Clean Air Coalition (CAC) has decided to update the region’s voluntary air quality plan to include additional measures targeted at reducing regional PM2.5 air pollution and enhancing awareness of PM air pollution. Page 44 of 67 •Currently, the region’s air pollution levels continue to be much closer to exceeding the ozone (O3) NAAQS than any of the PM NAAQS. •However, the region’s PM air pollution levels pose a much more significant public health threat than O 3, and the PM pollution levels may pose a more significant regulatory threat as well in the coming years. o This list of proposed measures targeted at regional PM 2.5 pollution were developed by a subcommittee of the Clean Air Coalition Advisory Committee (CACAC); o The list is intended to provide a “menu” of options for current and potential future CAC members to consider implementing as part of the regional plan. •CAPCOG is requesting that current CAC members consider this list of measures and notify CAPCOG of any new measures that the CAC organization plans to implement moving forward no later than May 31, 2021. o Then, CAPCOG staff will incorporate these commitments into an update to the regional plan that will be presented to the CAC at its August 11, 2021, meeting. Page 45 of 67 ▪CAPCOG has compiled a list of measures to be taken for consideration by CAC members and that CAC members identify potential methods of implementation. ▪Methods of implementation can range from passive controls such as encouraging and sharing best management practices (BMPs) or more aggressive controls such as contractor requirements that BMPs are implemented. ▪CAPCOG is not requesting that CAC members list in detail each specific action. o However, CAPCOG is requesting that CAC members indicate which general measures they will commit to implementing and the level of commitment (i.e., encouraging best management practices, ordinances, contractual specifications, outreach and education, etc.). Page 46 of 67 Measure and Status (i.e., new or existing) Implement within own organization’s operations Encourage or require 3rd party organizations to implement Educate and encourage the public at large to implement 1: Reduce PM emissions from construction and demolition activities (new) Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Yes No N/A 2: Reduce PM emissions from commercial cooking/charbroiling (new) Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Yes No N/A 3: Reduce PM emissions from road dust (new) Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Yes No N/A 4: Reduce PM emissions from mining and quarrying activities (new) Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Yes No N/A 5: Reducing PM emissions from open burning (new) Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Yes No N/A 6: Reduce PM emissions or impact of PM emissions from prescribed burning on high PM days (new) Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Yes No N/A 7: Reduce emissions from mobile sources year-round (existing) Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Yes No N/A 8: Reduce emissions from stationary combustion sources year-round (existing) Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Yes No N/A 9: Installation additional PM2.5 monitors/sensors within the region (new) Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Yes No N/A 10: Promote awareness of health effects of PM air pollution (new) Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Page 47 of 67 Date or Timeframe Milestone January 28, 2021 CACAC Meeting to review list of measures February 10, 2021 CAC meeting; present list of measures and open public comment period March 12, 2021 End of public comment period March 12-31, 2021 CAPCOG will compile comments and disseminate to CAC and CACAC May 3 –7, 2021 National Air Quality Awareness Week April 29, 2021 CACAC meeting; review progress May 12, 2021 CAC Meeting; review progress May 31, 2021 Target date for existing CAC members to update commitments June 25, 2021 Target date for commitments from new CAC members July 22, 2021 Target date for drafting plan & distribution to CACAC for review July 29, 2021 CACAC meeting to consider recommendation of plan update (tentative) August 11, 2021 CAC considers approval of update to plan August 13, 2021 CAPCOG submits the updated plan to EPA as “Path Forward” for participation Advance Program Additionally, CAPCOG plans to monitor new state legislation that may result in emission reduction activities from certain sectors (e.g., mining and quarry operations) from the private industry. On that note, the Texas Emission Reduction Plan (TERP) has the ability to open new grants that could target PM emissions, and CAPCOG staff will keep track of such changes. Page 48 of 67 Page 1 of 9 Proposed PM2.5 Emission Reduction and Planning Measures for the Austin-Round Rock-Georgetown MSA Regional Air Quality Plan January 22, 2021 Background In December 2020, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) concluded its periodic review of the particulate matter (PM) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) by deciding to retain all of the existing PM NAAQS. However, as part of this review, EPA staff indicated that there is no clear threshold below which exposure to PM pollution will not cause significant health problems, and EPA staff had recommended consideration of a tighter annual fine particulate matter (PM2.5) NAAQS. During the next PM NAAQS review in 2025, the new EPA Administrator could easily decide that a tighter NAAQS is necessary. Therefore, both from a public health perspective and a regulatory perspective, the Central Texas Clean Air Coalition (CAC) has decided to update the region’s voluntary air quality plan, 2019-2023 Austin-Round Rock-Georgetown Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) Regional Air Quality Plan, to include additional measures targeted at reducing regional PM2.5 air pollution and enhancing awareness of PM air pollution. Currently, the region’s air pollution levels continue to be much closer to exceeding the ozone (O3) NAAQS than any of the PM NAAQS. However, the region’s PM air pollution levels pose a much more significant public health threat than O3, and the PM pollution levels may pose a more significant regulatory threat as well in the coming years. This list of proposed measures targeted at regional PM2.5 pollution were developed by a subcommittee of the Clean Air Coalition Advisory Committee (CACAC), and the list is intended to provide a “menu” of options for current and potential future CAC members to consider implementing as part of the regional plan. CAPCOG is requesting that current CAC members consider this list of measures and notify CAPCOG of any new measures that the CAC organization plans to implement moving forward no later than May 31, 2021. Then, CAPCOG staff will incorporate these commitments into an update to the regional plan that will be presented to the CAC at its August 11, 2021, meeting. Proposed Measures CAPCOG is proposing that the following measures be taken for consideration by CAC members and that CAC members identify potential methods of implementation. Methods of implementation can range from passive controls such as encouraging and sharing best management practices (BMPs) or more aggressive controls such as contractor requirements that BMPs are implemented. Additionally, cities have the authority to influence private business behavior of PM2.5 emission generating activities occurring within their jurisdiction by ordinance. The proposed PM2.5 emission reductions are listed on the next page in a table. Several of the measures are new and specific to major sources of PM emissions that differ from the list of major sources of O3-forming emissions. However, organizations are encouraged to consider implementing any of the existing measures in the plan that they are not already implementing since it will also help reduce PM emissions and concentrations. The appendix contains detailed emission reduction activities that can occur under each sector. The appendix is provided as a reference to provide additional background and to help understand the multiple ways in which certain sectors could reduce emissions. CAPCOG is not requesting that CAC members list in detail each specific action. However, CAPCOG is requesting that CAC members indicate which general measures they will commit to implementing and the level of commitment (i.e., encouraging best management practices, ordinances, contractual specifications, outreach and education, etc.). Page 49 of 67 Proposed Regional PM2.5 Emission Reduction and Planning Measures for the Austin-Round Rock-Georgetown MSA Regional Air Quality Plan - January 22, 2021 Page 2 of 9 Organization: Table 1 - PM2.5 Emission Reduction and Planning Measures for Austin-Round Rock-Georgetown MSA Air Quality Plan Measure and Status (i.e., new or existing) Implement within own organization’s operations Encourage or require 3rd party organizations to implement Educate and encourage the public at large to implement 1: Reduce PM emissions from construction and demolition activities (new) Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Yes No N/A 2: Reduce PM emissions from commercial cooking/charbroiling (new) Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Yes No N/A 3: Reduce PM emissions from road dust (new) Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Yes No N/A 4: Reduce PM emissions from mining and quarrying activities (new) Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Yes No N/A 5: Reducing PM emissions from open burning (new) Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Yes No N/A 6: Reduce PM emissions or impact of PM emissions from prescribed burning on high PM days (new) Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Yes No N/A 7: Reduce emissions from mobile sources year- round (existing) Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Yes No N/A 8: Reduce emissions from stationary combustion sources year-round (existing) Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Yes No N/A 9: Installation additional PM2.5 monitors/sensors within the region (new) Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Yes No N/A 10: Promote awareness of health effects of PM air pollution (new) Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Page 50 of 67 Proposed Regional PM2.5 Emission Reduction and Planning Measures for the Austin-Round Rock-Georgetown MSA Regional Air Quality Plan - January 22, 2021 Page 3 of 9 Next Steps Below is the timeline that CAPCOG plans to follow regarding collecting public comments, soliciting emission reduction commitments from CAC members, and updating the Regional Air Quality Plan. Additionally, CAPCOG plans to monitor new state legislation that may result in emission reduction activities from certain sectors (e.g., mining and quarry operations) from the private industry. On that note, the Texas Emission Reduction Plan (TERP) has the ability to open new grants that could target PM emissions, and CAPCOG staff will keep track of such changes. Table 2 - Timeline for 2021 Update to the 2019-2023 Regional Air Quality Plan Update for PM2.5 Date or Timeframe Milestone January 28, 2021 CACAC Meeting to review list of measures February 10, 2021 CAC meeting; present list of measures and open public comment period March 12, 2021 End of public comment period March 12- 31, 2021 CAPCOG will compile comments and disseminate to CAC and CACAC May 3 – 7, 2021 National Air Quality Awareness Week April 29, 2021 CACAC meeting; review progress May 12, 2021 CAC Meeting; review progress May 31, 2021 Target date for existing CAC members to update commitments June 25, 2021 Target date for commitments from new CAC members July 22, 2021 Target date for drafting plan & distribution to CACAC for review July 29, 2021 CACAC meeting to consider recommendation of plan update (tentative) August 11, 2021 CAC considers approval of update to plan August 13, 2021 CAPCOG submits the updated plan to EPA as “Path Forward” for participation Advance Program Page 51 of 67 Proposed Regional PM2.5 Emission Reduction and Planning Measures for the Austin-Round Rock-Georgetown MSA Regional Air Quality Plan - January 22, 2021 Page 4 of 9 Appendix A: Additional Background Health Effects and Sensitive Populations from Particulate Matter As noted above, the EPA’s review of the PM NAAQS indicated that there is not a threshold below which effects do not occur for either short-term or long-term exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5)1. Therefore, there are public health benefits of reducing both long-term and short-term exposure to PM2.5 even if an area is attaining the PM2.5 NAAQS. Exposure to PM2.5 pollution can affect the lungs and heart as PM2.5 particles are small enough to penetrate those body systems. According to the EPA, numerous scientific studies have linked particle pollution exposure to a variety of problems, including: • Premature death in people with heart or lung disease; • Nonfatal heart attacks; • Irregular heartbeat; • Aggravated asthma; • Decreased lung function; and • Increased respiratory symptoms, such as irritation of the airways, coughing or difficulty breathing. People with heart or lung diseases, children, and older adults are the most likely to be affected by PM2.5 pollution exposure. These sensitive groups comprise at least40% of the population in the MSA. Additionally, people of color and people with low incomes tend to have disproportionate exposure to high PM2.5 levels. Types and Sources of PM2.5 Pollution in the Region PM2.5 is both a primary pollutant (i.e., directly emitted from different sources) and a secondary pollutant (i.e., formed in the atmosphere through chemical reactions and processes from other direct emissions). Sources of PM2.5 include: • Crustal PM2.5 – particles from dust/soil; • Elemental carbon (EC) PM2.5 – particles that contain the elemental form of carbon (i.e., graphite); • Organic carbon (OC) PM2.5 – particles that contain organic molecules (hydrocarbons); • Sulfate PM2.5 – particles that contain SO4 molecules; • Nitrate PM2.5 – particles that contain NO3 molecules; and • Ammonium PM2.5 – particles that contain NH4 molecules. Of these types of PM2.5, the one that appears to be contributing the most to variations in annual PM2.5 concentrations within the region is organic carbon PM2.5. While the local and background components of these totals is not known, the large variation in the organic carbon PM2.5 contributions at the two regional regulatory monitors in 2014-2018 accounts for the entire difference in the annual PM2.5 concentrations between these locations. This suggests that reducing organic carbon PM2.5 emissions would be the most important step that the region can take towards reducing the highest annual PM2.5 concentrations, which are located in the urban core. The largest sources of PM2.5 and organic carbon PM2.5 within the Austin-Round Rock-Georgetown MSA are listed below: 1 EPA. Integrated Science Assessment for Particulate Matter. December 2019. EPA/600/R-19/188, http://ofmpub.epa.gov/eims/eimscomm.getfile?p_download_id=539935. Page 52 of 67 Proposed Regional PM2.5 Emission Reduction and Planning Measures for the Austin-Round Rock-Georgetown MSA Regional Air Quality Plan - January 22, 2021 Page 5 of 9 Table 3 – Largest sources of PM2.5 Emissions in the region, 2017 Source Category Tons per year PM2.5 % of Total PM2.5 Emissions Tons per year OC PM2.5 % of Total OC PM2.5 Emissions Road Dust 2,325 22% 153 6% Construction Dust 1,693 16% 78 3% Open Burning 1,574 15% 611 26% Prescribed Fires 861 8% 403 17% Agricultural Dust 793 8% 24 1% Commercial Cooking 417 4% 279 12% Mining and Quarrying 326 3% 0 0% Subtotal 7,989 76% 1,548 65% Significantly, this list of sources is very different than the list of main sources of emissions contributing to peak O3 formation, which is dominated by mobile sources and point sources. While measures to reduce O3-forming emissions from mobile sources and point sources will also help reduce PM2.5, those sources do not contribute nearly as much to the region’s PM2.5 concentrations as they do to peak O3 formation. Detailed Emission Reduction Measures This section outlines in detail the specific emission reduction activities that could occur under each sector. This is meant to provide an idea of specific activities, and it is not required that CAC members list in detail which specific action (e.g., water application) is planned to be implemented. 1. Reduce emissions from construction and demolition activities a. There are a number of ways to reduce PM emissions during construction and demolition. The list below is compiled from the WRAP Fugitive Dust Handbook2 and a best practice document from Canada3 b. Water application c. Dust suppressants d. Reschedule large dust generating activities from high wind days or forecasted high PM days e. Design: i. Plan for minimizing dust generation ii. Choosing building material to reduce dust generation iii. Minimize distances travelled for delivery of materials iv. Use of green building materials v. Design and construction for maximum energy efficiency f. Site preparation i. Grade the construction site in phases ii. Use wind fencing iii. Stabilize surfaces of completed earthworks with vegetation iv. Stabilize earthworks with stone/soil/geotextiles 2 Western Regional Air Partnership’s (WRAP’s) Fugitive Dust Handbook, https://www.wrapair.org//forums/dejf/fdh/content/FDHandbook_R ev_06.pdf 3Best Practices for the Reduction of Air Emissions From Construction and Demolition Activities , http://www.bv.transports.gouv.qc.ca/mono/1173259.pdf Page 53 of 67 Proposed Regional PM2.5 Emission Reduction and Planning Measures for the Austin-Round Rock-Georgetown MSA Regional Air Quality Plan - January 22, 2021 Page 6 of 9 v. Create ridges to prevent dust vi. Compact disturbed soil vii. Eliminate open burning viii. Reduce certain activities during windy conditions g. Storage piles: i. Storage pile activity should be conducted downwind ii. Utilize enclosures/coverings for storage piles iii. Utilize wind fences/screens for storage piles iv. Use vegetation cover as a wind break v. Properly shape storage piles vi. Properly schedule the delivery of landscaping materials h. Material Handling & Transfer Systems i. Control mud and dirt trackout and carryout ii. Minimize material drop at the transfer point and enclosure iii. Utilize foam suppression systems iv. Secure loads on haul trucks v. Prevent PM emissions from spills vi. Minimize material handling operations vii. Capture fugitive dust emissions viii. Utilize wind barriers ix. Reduce certain activities during windy conditions i. Road surfaces i. Establish on-site vehicle restrictions ii. Surface improvements to unpaved road surfaces iii. Proper maintenance of unpaved roads iv. Work practices associated with de-icing materials j. Fabrication i. On high PM days, reschedule the following: 1. Cutting and grinding 2. Sand and grit blasting and façade cleaning 3. Concrete cutting 4. Mixing processes 5. Internal and external finishing and refurbishment k. Demolition and Deconstruction i. Apply deconstruction techniques ii. Minimize drop heights for debris iii. Enclose chutes and cover bins iv. Use fogging systems v. Construct barriers to prevent dispersion vi. Avoid blasting when feasible vii. Vacuum debris viii. Work practices for loading debris ix. Avoid prolonged storage of debris 2. Reduce emissions from commercial cooking/charbroiling, possibly through some kind of grant program Page 54 of 67 Proposed Regional PM2.5 Emission Reduction and Planning Measures for the Austin-Round Rock-Georgetown MSA Regional Air Quality Plan - January 22, 2021 Page 7 of 9 a. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) Menu of Control Measures4 identifies one control for commercial cooking, catalytic oxidizers, which are estimated to achieve an 83% control efficiency at a cost of $3,252 per ton of PM + volatile organic compounds (VOCs). i. This measure focuses on the control of PM emissions from over-fire and conveyor charbroilers. The use of a catalytic oxidizer, placed above the charbroiler in the stack and activated by heat from the cooking, appears to be the best and most cost-effective emission control device for charbroilers. ii. Cities in California and New York have established exemptions for establishments that charbroil less than 400 – 1,000 pounds of meat per week. b. If funds are available, a grant program could be implemented to assist restaurants and food service businesses, that charbroil a certain threshold of meat, in purchasing and installing a catalytic oxidizer. 3. Reduce road dust emissions2 a. Paved roads and parking lots: i. Water flushing/sweeping ii. Improvements in sanding/salting applications and materials iii. Covering haul trucks iv. Prevention of vehicle dust trackout 1. Curb installation 2. Shoulder stabilization b. Unpaved roads & parking lots i. Paving ii. Chemical stabilization/dust suppressant iii. Surface improvement (e.g., gravel) iv. Vehicle speed reduction (to 25 miles/hour or less) v. Watering twice a day for industrial unpaved road 4. Reduce emissions from mining and quarrying activities a. EPA4 identifies the following control measures for direct PM emissions from “Mineral Products – Stone Quarrying & Processing” at stationary facilities at which materials are being handled after quarrying. i. Dry Electrostatic Precipitator (ESP) – Wire Plate Type ii. Fabric Filter iii. Paper/Nonwoven Filters – Cartridge Collector iv. Venturi Scrubber v. Wet Electrostatic Precipitator (ESP) – Wire Plate Type b. PM reduction measures at the mining and quarrying site are2,5: i. Reschedule blasting and other large dust generating activities from days with high winds or high PM levels 4 EPA Point & Non-Point PM Menu of Control Measures, https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016- 02/documents/menuofcontrolmeasures.pdf 5 Public Citizen Urges Texas Legislature to Rein in Aggregate Pollution, https://www.citizen.org/article/public-citizen-urges- texas-legislature-to-rein-in-aggregate-pollution/ Page 55 of 67 Proposed Regional PM2.5 Emission Reduction and Planning Measures for the Austin-Round Rock-Georgetown MSA Regional Air Quality Plan - January 22, 2021 Page 8 of 9 ii. Implement wet suppression iii. Enclose or cover storage piles iv. Plant vegetation as a windbreak and/or erect artificial wind barriers v. Control mud and dirt trackout vi. Secure loads on haul trucks vii. Vehicle wash stations upon exiting property viii. Route optimization to avoid neighborhoods and school zone times ix. Vacuuming dust c. The control measures for unpaved roads2 are potentially applicable to mines and quarries. These measures include: i. Pave roads and high-traffic areas ii. Chemical stabilization/dust suppressant iii. Surface improvement (e.g., gravel) iv. Vehicle speed reduction to 25 miles/hour v. Watering twice a day for industrial unpaved road 5. Reducing open burning a. Working with the Capital Area Regional Environmental Task Force (RETF) and other city or county environmental enforcement staff to enforce burn bans and the state’s Outdoor Burning Rule i. Outdoor Burning Rule, Title 30, Texas Administrative Code, Sections 111.201–221 1. The Outdoor Burning Rule requires that certain kinds of burning be conducted downwind of, or at least 300 feet from, any structure containing sensitive receptors located on adjacent properties unless written approval is obtained beforehand from the owner or occupant—the one who will suffer adverse effects—of the adjacent or downwind property. Also, the burning must not cause a nuisance or traffic hazard. 2. See the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality’s (TCEQ’s) Outdoor Burning in Texas Guide - https://www.tceq.texas.gov/assets/public/comm_exec/pubs/rg/rg- 049.pdf b. Educating the public on fire and air quality hazards from open burning 6. Working to ensure prescribed burning activities do not coincide with projected high PM days, if possible a. According to Travis County’s Park Land Manager, prescribed burn windows are identified the week before the prescribed burn. Therefore, it is recommended that prescribed burning staff consider the air quality forecast for the timeframe in which the burns are being considered. There a lot of factors that go into selecting the day of a prescribed burn such as meteorology and staff availability, so it may not be possible to avoid some high PM days. Note that this measure would be expected to reduce peak daily 24-hour PM2.5 concentrations, but not annual PM2.5 concentrations. CAPCOG can also encourage consideration of co-benefits of PM air pollution reductions from other actions/measures that are already in the Regional Air Quality6 plan for O3 that also could impact regional 24- hour or annual PM2.5 concentrations 7. Measures to reduce air pollution from the use of fleet/commercial vehicles and equipment: 6 2019-2023 Austin-Round Rock-Georgetown MSA Regional Air Quality Plan, https://www.capcog.org/wp- content/uploads/2019/10/2019-2023_Regional_Air_Quality_Plan.pdf Page 56 of 67 Proposed Regional PM2.5 Emission Reduction and Planning Measures for the Austin-Round Rock-Georgetown MSA Regional Air Quality Plan - January 22, 2021 Page 9 of 9 a. Tier 1 i. Establish and enforce idling restriction policies for use of the organization’s vehicles, equipment, and property ii. Establish fleet management policies that prioritize the use of vehicles and equipment with low emission rates iii. Educate fleet users on driving and equipment operation practices that can reduce emissions iv. Seek funding to accelerate replacement of older, higher-emitting vehicles and equipment with newer, cleaner vehicles and equipment, such as TERP grants b. Tier 2 i. Establish low-emission purchasing policies for new on-road vehicles, non-road equipment, and stationary equipment ii. Enforce vehicle idling restrictions within the community [either through an ordinance if a city or a memorandum of agreement with TCEQ if a county]. 8. Measures to reduce air pollution from power plants and other stationary combustion sources: a. Conserve energy b. Schedule discretionary emission-generating activities such as engine testing to periods that would avoid peak 8-hour O3 or 24-hour PM2.5 concentrations The following measures would also be expected to generally improve understanding and awareness of PM2.5 air pollution, which could lead to emission reduction or exposure reduction by the community at large. 9. Encourage installation of additional PM2.5 monitors/sensors within the region a. More PM2.5 monitors and sensors in the MSA would allow a better understanding of where elevated PM2.5 levels are occurring and the populations that are most affected by high PM2.5. 10. Promote awareness of health effects of PM air pollution a. PM2.5 poses the greater risk to human health than ozone as PM2.5 can be inhaled deep into the lungs and can enter the bloodstream. According to the EPA, numerous scientific studies have linked particle pollution exposure to a variety of problems, including: i. Premature death in people with heart or lung disease ii. Nonfatal heart attacks iii. Irregular heartbeat iv. Aggravated asthma v. Decreased lung function vi. Increased respiratory symptoms, such as irritation of the airways, coughing or difficulty breathing. b. People with heart or lung diseases, children, and older adults are the most likely to be affected by particle pollution exposure. i. AirNow, www.airnow.gov, can help the public view the air quality in their area in order to avoid elevated PM levels. Page 57 of 67 City of Georgetown, Texas Transportation Advisory Board February 12, 2021 S UB J E C T: C o nsideration and pos s ible actio n to ap p rove the Minutes from the November 13, 2020 Meeting. -- No ah Ko o ntz - Board Liais on IT E M S UMMARY: F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: NO NE S UB MIT T E D B Y: No ah Ko o ntz - Bo ard Liaison AT TAC H ME N T S: D escription Type Minutes Backup Material Page 58 of 67 The City of Georgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If you require assistance in participation at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the ADA, reasonable assistance, adaptations, or accommodations will be provided upon request. Please contact the City at least three (3) days prior to the scheduled meeting date, at (512)930-3652 or City Hall at 113 East 8th Street for additional information: TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. Board Members Present: Sheila Mills – Board Chair, Dan Jones, Michael Miles, James Hougnon, Bryan Hutchinson, George Brown, Ercel Brashear, Board Members Absent: Rachael Jonrowe, Robert Redoutey Staff Present: Wes Wright, Ray Miller, Noah Koontz, Wayne Reed, Nathan Parras Others Present: Carl Norris-ACC Regular Session A. Call to Order: Meeting called to order by Chairperson Sheila Mills at 10:00am Georgetown Transportation Advisory Board may, at any time, recess the Regular Session to Convene an Executive Session at the request of the Chair, a Board Member, The City Manager, Assistant City Manager, General Manager of Utilities, City Council Member, or legal counsel for any purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code Chapter 551, and are subject to action in the Regular Session that follows. B. Introduction of Board Members and Visitors: All board members, visitors, and staff were introduced. C. Updates to various planning initiatives by CAMPO and TxDOT transportation improvement projects as wells as an update on GoGeo Operations. Ray Miller gave updates. All updates included in the packet. D. Monthly Airport Report - Joseph A. Carney, C.M., Airport Manager and Ray Miller, Acting Director of Public Works. Joseph Carney gave updates. All updates included in the packet. Citizens Wishing to Address the Board: The following people with the Airport Concerned Citizens (ACC) signed up to speak to the Board on Item E: Carl Norris – 3 minutes – Statement attached to minutes. Minutes of the Meeting of the Georgetown Transportation Advisory Board and the Governing Body of the City of Georgetown, Texas November 13, 2020 Page 59 of 67 E. November 2020 GTAB Updates - Wesley Wright, P.E., Systems Engineering Director/Michael Hallmark, CIP Manager. Wesley Wright gave updates. All updates included in the packet. Legislative Regular Agenda F. Consideration and possible approval of the Minutes from the September 11, 2020 Meeting – Noah Koontz – Board Liaison. MOTION by Hutchinson, second by Hougnon to approve the minutes. APPROVED 6-0-3 (Brashear, Redoutey, and Jonrowe – absent) G. Consideration and possible recommendation on Task Order KHA-21-001 with Kimley- Horn and Associates of Austin, Texas in the amount of $1,583,144 for professional engineering services related to the expansion of DB Wood Road (SH29 to Oak Ridge) -- Wesley Wright, PE, Systems Engineering Director. MOTION by Hutchinson, second by Miles. APPROVED 6-0-3 (Brashear, Redoutey, and Jonrowe – absent) Adjournment Motion by Hutchinson, second by Miles. APPROVED 6-0-3 (Brashear, Redoutey, and Jonrowe – absent) Meeting was Adjourned at 11:13 AM Approved: Attested: Sheila Mills - Chair Dan Jones – Secretary Noah Koontz – GTAB Board Liaison Page 60 of 67 GTAB STATEMENT NOVEMBER 13, 2020 AGENDA ITEM “D” AIRPORT MONTHLY REPORT Good morning Madam Chairman, and members of the GTAB. My name is Hugh C. Norris, Jr. My residence is 4400 Luna Trail, Georgetown, Texas. I am a member of the Airport Concerned Citizens (ACC). For the past seven years the ACC has demanded our city leaders end their shroud of secrecy over operations expansion of our airport. Those leaders include members of this board which serves as the direct interface with the general public. These demands have included multiple presentations of specific examples of public safety and health hazards and Extraordinary Circumstances applicable to the expanding airport in the heart of our city and atop the EARZ and official's violations of FAA NEPA compliance regulations. These hazards and violations remain unknown to the public. Our demands are for NEPA structured public awareness open town hall meetings for categorical question and answer sessions on potential social, economic and environmental impacts of a proposed project's airport federal/state taxpayer funding, mitigation measures for elimination or reduction of adverse impacts AND full examination of ALL practicable alternatives to the project including airport relocation. To date, this board has refused to conduct such government transparency hearings under its authority or recommend such action to the city council. By such secrecy, our community is oblivious to the public safety and health threats to itself and the region. Two items in the Austin American Statesman (AAS) this week have again brought our demands for such hearings to the forefront: (1) The opening Thursday of the Kalahari Resort in Round Rock. This single development is expected to generate one to two million visitors per year and, with the exploding population and business growth of Central Texas, a vast increase in charter air passengers for our airport. Our leaders admonish citizens that our airport will never serve passenger air service such as American or Delta while cynically ignoring to the public that unlimited charter air passenger service and air cargo are acceptable. (2) The article in the AAS of the destruction in San Antonio of existing neighborhoods near Randolph AFB within runway clear zones, the most dangerous areas for take offs and landings. Such destruction here is guaranteed with continued operations expansions. Madam Chairman, the ACC again demands full and open airport public NEPA structured town hall meetings for public awareness and government transparency. Page 61 of 67 City of Georgetown, Texas Transportation Advisory Board February 12, 2021 S UB J E C T: C o nsideration and p o s s ib le recommendatio n to award a c o ntract to Yoko Excavating, LLC o f Belton, Texas fo r the 2020 C urb and G utter R eplac ement p ro ject and the 18t h S treet Drainage Improvement p ro ject, in the amo unt o f $429,855.00 – Wes ley Wright, P.E., S ys tems Engineering Direc tor IT E M S UMMARY: T his projec t c o ns is ts o f removing and replac ing o ld curb and gutter that d o es not properly d rain storm water and prematurely d amage s treets . T his p ro jec t includ es 2 parts . P art A includ es approximately 5,650 LF of curb and gutter rep lacement o n Live O ak Drive, R idge O ak Drive and Meadowb ro o k Drive, P art B includ es ap p ro ximately 400 LF o f c urb and gutter rep lac ement, valley gutter and minor grading improvements on 18th street between Louis e S treet and Hutto R d. T his p ro ject was p ublic ly advertised on No vemb er 15, 2020 and No vember 22, 2020. Twenty five (25) firms o b tained p lans. F ro m thes e plan holders on December 15, 2020 we received thirteen (13) competitive b id s . T he low q ualified b id d er for the projec t was Yo ko Exc avating, L L C with a to tal b id of $429,855.00. Yo ko Excavating have succ es s fully comp leted S imilar projec ts for vario us munic ip alities and d evelop ers in the C entral Texas R egion. Kas berg, P atrick & Asso c iates , LP have reviewed the c urrent wo rkload , referenc es , and c o nstruc tion histo ry o f Yoko Excavating, L L C . As a res ult o f their find ings , Kas b erg, P atric k & Assoc iates, LP rec o mmends that a c o ntract be awarded fo r all p arts to Yo ko Exc avating, LLC in the amount o f $429,855.00. S TAF F R E C O MME N D AT ION: S taff concurs with Kas b erg, P atrick & As s oc iates and recommend s awarding the c o ntract to Yo ko Exc avating, LLC o f Belton, Texas for C urb and G utter R ep lacement p rojec t (P art A) and the 18th S treet Drainage Improvement projec t (P art B), in the amount of $429,855.00 F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: F und s for this p ro ject are b udgeted in the S torm Water C I P F und . S UB MIT T E D B Y: C hris P o usso n AT TAC H ME N T S: D escription Type Letter of Recommendation Backup Material Bid Tab Backup Material Page 62 of 67 January 21, 2021 Mr. Chris Pousson Systems Engineering Project Manager City of Georgetown 300-1 Industrial Avenue Georgetown, Texas 78626-8445 Re: City of Georgetown 2020 Curb & Gutter Replacement Project Georgetown, Texas Dear Mr. Pousson, Bids were received by the City of Georgetown until 2:00 P.M. on Tuesday, December 15, 2020 for the above referenced project. There thirteen (13) competitive bids and two (2) non-responsive bids were received. A detailed bid tabulation of this bid is attached for your use. The project consisted of a two (2) Part Base Bid and an Alternate Bid. A summary of the project and their locations are listed below: Part A: C&G Replacement @ Meadowbrook, Oakland & Ridge Oak - $384,780.00 • Installation of new curb and gutter for the following streets: o Meadowbrook Dr: San Gabriel Overlook W to Shady Oak Drive o Oakland Dr: San Gabriel Overlook E to Shady Oak Drive o Ridge Oak Dr: San Gabriel Overlook E to Shady Oak Drive Part B: 18th Street Drainage Improvements – $45,075.00: • Installation of new curb and gutter, valley gutter and minor grading improvements on 18th Street from Louise Street to Hutto Road. KASBERG, PATRICK & ASSOCIATES, LP CONSULTING ENGINEERS Texas Firm F-510 Temple RICK N. KASBERG, P.E. Georgetown 19 North Main Street R. DAVID PATRICK, P.E., CFM 800 South Austin Avenue Temple, Texas 76501 THOMAS D. VALLE, P.E. Georgetown, Texas 78626 (254) 773-3731 GINGER R. TOLBERT, P.E. (512) 819-9478 ALVIN R. “TRAE” SUTTON, III, P.E., CFM JOHN A. SIMCIK, P.E., CFM Page 63 of 67 Mr. Chris Pousson January 21, 2021 Page Two The low qualified bidder for the project is Yoko Excavating, LLC of Belton, Texas. Yoko Excavating, LLC has successfully completed similar projects for various municipalities and developers in the Central Texas Region. We have reviewed the current workload, references, construction history, and conducted an in person interview with Yoko Excavating, LLC. As a result of our findings, we recommend that a contract be awarded for the Base Bid (Parts A & B) to Yoko Excavating, LLC in the amount of $429,855.00. Sincerely, Alvin R. (Trae) Sutton III, P.E., CFM ARS/ xc: Mr. Wesley Wright, PE, City of Georgetown Mr. Michael Hallmark, City of Georgetown Ms. Nicole Abrego, City of Georgetown 2019-153-30 Page 64 of 67 BID TABULATION CITY OF GEORGETOWN TEXAS 2020 Curb and Gutter Replacement Project December 15, 2020; 2:00 PM 2019-153-40 Item Estimated Unit Bid Data No.Quantity Description PART A 1 100%LS Insurance, Bonds and Mobilization, not to exceed 5% of Total $16,250.00 $16,250.00 $14,000.00 $14,000.00 $22,500.00 $22,500.00 $24,598.00 $24,598.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 2 100%LS For Providing a Video DVD of the Project Area Prior to and After Construction 750.00 750.00 400.00 400.00 230.00 230.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 820.00 820.00 3 37 STA Provide Labor, Equipment, Tools and Supervision to Complete Preparation of Right-of-way 500.00 18,500.00 250.00 9,250.00 130.00 4,810.00 276.00 10,212.00 350.00 12,950.00 4 100%LS Preparation of Traffic Control Plan 1,000.00 1,000.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 1,300.00 1,300.00 8,000.00 8,000.00 960.00 960.00 5 100%LS Traffic Control Plan Implementation 2,500.00 2,500.00 5,422.00 5,422.00 1,100.00 1,100.00 8,000.00 8,000.00 6,500.00 6,500.00 6 100%LS Prepare Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan, Including Submission to and Receiving Permits from Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ)1,500.00 1,500.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 820.00 820.00 7 3,200 LF Furnish, Install & Removal of Filter Sock 2.00 6,400.00 4.00 12,800.00 3.30 10,560.00 3.27 10,464.00 3.00 9,600.00 8 5 EA Furnish, Install & Removal of Inlet Protection System 150.00 750.00 65.00 325.00 100.00 500.00 150.00 750.00 150.00 750.00 9 2,250 CY For Unclassified Excavation of Existing Roadway, Including Asphalt, Base, & Material behind the Curb 10.00 22,500.00 19.50 43,875.00 18.00 40,500.00 27.55 61,987.50 26.00 58,500.00 10 6,900 LF For Removal & Haul Off of Existing Concrete Curb & Gutter & Driveway 3.00 20,700.00 6.00 41,400.00 8.50 58,650.00 2.40 16,560.00 6.00 41,400.00 11 5,650 LF Furnish & Install Standard Curb & Gutter 14.00 79,100.00 16.00 90,400.00 20.30 114,695.00 22.52 127,238.00 25.00 141,250.00 12 1,250 LF Furnish & Install 2-foot wide Driveway Laydown Curb (Driveway Valley Gutter) 13.00 16,250.00 16.00 20,000.00 19.70 24,625.00 21.65 27,062.50 32.00 40,000.00 13 4,550 SY Furnish & Install 8-inch Limestone Base Under Curb As Needed 10.00 45,500.00 7.00 31,850.00 11.00 50,050.00 13.62 61,971.00 14.00 63,700.00 14 550 TN Furnish & Install HMAC Type C Patch 135.00 74,250.00 130.00 71,500.00 152.00 83,600.00 135.06 74,283.00 180.00 99,000.00 15 300 SY Furnish & Install Concrete Driveway (High Early Strength Concrete) 65.50 19,650.00 80.00 24,000.00 73.00 21,900.00 68.02 20,406.00 120.00 36,000.00 16 70 SY Furnish & Install Concrete Sidewalk Connection 54.00 3,780.00 55.00 3,850.00 60.00 4,200.00 75.36 5,275.20 170.00 11,900.00 17 1,300 SY Install, Maintain & Establish Either Bermuda or St. Augustine Grass Sod 8.00 10,400.00 9.00 11,700.00 4.10 5,330.00 11.00 14,300.00 10.00 13,000.00 18 100%LS For Irrigation Repair Allowance by a Licensed Irrigator to be paid Repair Invoice plus 20% 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 19 100%LS For City of Georgetown Force Account 25,000.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 TOTAL PART A (Items 1 - 19) Item Estimated Unit Bid Data No.Quantity Description PART B 1 100%LS Insurance, Bonds and Mobilization, not to exceed 5% of Total $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $3,125.00 $3,125.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $1,899.00 $1,899.00 2,500.00 $2,500.00 2 100%LS For Providing a Video DVD of the Project Area Prior to and After Construction 750.00 750.00 400.00 400.00 230.00 230.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 820.00 820.00 3 400 LF Provide Labor, Equipment, Tools and Supervision to Complete Preparation of Right-of-way 3.75 1,500.00 1.50 600.00 1.30 520.00 2.50 1,000.00 10.00 4,000.00 4 100%LS Preparation of Traffic Control Plan 1,000.00 1,000.00 400.00 400.00 100.00 100.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 820.00 820.00 5 100%LS Traffic Control Plan Implementation 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 200.00 200.00 2,100.00 2,100.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 6 200 SY Remove & Haul Off Existing Pavement 10.00 2,000.00 10.00 2,000.00 18.00 3,600.00 10.65 2,130.00 30.00 6,000.00 7 55 SY Remove & Haul Off Existing Concrete Driveway 21.00 1,155.00 28.00 1,540.00 18.00 990.00 45.04 2,477.20 25.00 1,375.00 8 90 SY Remove & Haul Off Existing Concrete Curb & Gutter 21.00 1,890.00 27.00 2,430.00 18.00 1,620.00 2.40 216.00 10.00 900.00 9 200 SY Furnish & Install 8" Base Material 15.00 3,000.00 8.00 1,600.00 11.00 2,200.00 12.62 2,524.00 38.00 7,600.00 10 200 SY Furnish & Install 2" Type D HMAC 24.00 4,800.00 16.00 3,200.00 46.00 9,200.00 20.00 4,000.00 25.00 5,000.00 11 25 TN Furnish & Install 2" Type C HMAC Patch 135.00 3,375.00 135.00 3,375.00 152.00 3,800.00 135.06 3,376.50 190.00 4,750.00 12 400 LF Furnish & Install Standard Curb & Gutter 21.00 8,400.00 16.00 6,400.00 20.30 8,120.00 22.52 9,008.00 25.00 10,000.00 13 25 SY Furnish & Install Concrete Valley Gutter 58.00 1,450.00 16.00 400.00 65.00 1,625.00 75.36 1,884.00 125.00 3,125.00 14 55 SY Install Concrete Driveway (High Early Strength Concrete)145.00 7,975.00 88.00 4,840.00 70.00 3,850.00 68.02 3,741.10 110.00 6,050.00 15 150 SY Install, Maintain & Establish Either Bermuda or St. Augustine Grass Sod 17.00 2,550.00 10.00 1,500.00 4.10 615.00 11.00 1,650.00 10.00 1,500.00 16 276 LF Furnish, Install & Removal of Silt Fence 5.00 1,380.00 3.00 828.00 2.90 800.40 2.50 690.00 4.00 1,104.00 17 1 EA Furnish, Install & Removal of Inlet Protection System 350.00 350.00 65.00 65.00 100.00 100.00 500.00 500.00 150.00 150.00 TOTAL PART B (Items 1 - 17) TOTAL PART A (Items 1 - 19)$384,780.00 $430,772.00 $490,550.00 $520,607.20 $607,150.00 TOTAL PART B (Items 1 - 17)$45,075.00 $34,203.00 $39,570.40 $39,695.80 $58,194.00 $429,855.00 $464,975.00 $530,120.40 $560,303.00 $665,344.00 Did Bidder Acknowledge Addendums No. 1 - No. 3? Did Bidder provide Section #00400? Did Bidder provide Section #00410? 39,695.80$ 45,075.00$ Choice Builders LLC 3809 S. General Bruce Dr., Ste 103 Temple, TX 76502 490,550.00$ 39,570.40$ Unit Price Extended Jonestown, TX 78645 607,150.00$ Yoko Excavating LLC 11720 W. Adams Ave, Suite #C Belton, TX 76513 384,780.00$ CLC Unlimited Inc 1955 FM 2001, Ste 200 Buda, TX 78610 520,607.20$ Austin Underground Inc 58,194.00$ Terrapath Inc 3267 Bee Cave Rd., Ste. 107-514 Austin, TX 78746 430,772.00$ 34,203.00$ Unit Amount Unit Price Extended Amount 18825 Packsaddle Road BIDDER INFORMATION 1 2 3 4 5 Unit Price Extended Amount Unit Price ExtendedExtended Amount Unit Price Extended Amount BID SUMMARY Unit Price Extended AmountPrice Extended Amount Unit Price Extended AmountAmount Unit Price Extended Amount Unit Price YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES * Extended Amount Corrected **Total Amount Corrected 1 of 3 Page 65 of 67 BID TABULATION CITY OF GEORGETOWN TEXAS 2020 Curb and Gutter Replacement Project December 15, 2020; 2:00 PM 2019-153-40 Item Estimated Unit Bid Data No.Quantity Description PART A 1 100%LS Insurance, Bonds and Mobilization, not to exceed 5% of Total $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $22,000.00 $22,000.00 $32,000.00 $32,000.00 $23,816.00 $23,816.00 $32,000.00 $32,000.00 2 100%LS For Providing a Video DVD of the Project Area Prior to and After Construction 1,000.00 1,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 725.00 725.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 3 37 STA Provide Labor, Equipment, Tools and Supervision to Complete Preparation of Right-of-way 1,500.00 55,500.00 162.16 5,999.92 165.00 6,105.00 780.00 28,860.00 450.00 16,650.00 4 100%LS Preparation of Traffic Control Plan 5,000.00 5,000.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 4,942.00 4,942.00 4,500.00 4,500.00 5 100%LS Traffic Control Plan Implementation 2,500.00 2,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 13,628.00 13,628.00 18,000.00 18,000.00 6 100%LS Prepare Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan, Including Submission to and Receiving Permits from Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ)3,000.00 3,000.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 2,471.00 2,471.00 2,800.00 2,800.00 7 3,200 LF Furnish, Install & Removal of Filter Sock 7.00 22,400.00 4.69 15,008.00 1.00 3,200.00 11.00 35,200.00 10.00 32,000.00 8 5 EA Furnish, Install & Removal of Inlet Protection System 100.00 500.00 600.00 3,000.00 165.00 825.00 124.00 620.00 100.00 500.00 9 2,250 CY For Unclassified Excavation of Existing Roadway, Including Asphalt, Base, & Material behind the Curb 20.00 45,000.00 16.44 36,990.00 20.00 45,000.00 26.00 58,500.00 18.00 40,500.00 10 6,900 LF For Removal & Haul Off of Existing Concrete Curb & Gutter & Driveway 3.00 20,700.00 2.89 19,941.00 7.00 48,300.00 6.00 41,400.00 10.00 69,000.00 11 5,650 LF Furnish & Install Standard Curb & Gutter 20.00 113,000.00 38.00 214,700.00 40.00 226,000.00 21.00 118,650.00 23.00 129,950.00 12 1,250 LF Furnish & Install 2-foot wide Driveway Laydown Curb (Driveway Valley Gutter) 20.00 25,000.00 35.00 43,750.00 33.00 41,250.00 27.00 33,750.00 28.00 35,000.00 13 4,550 SY Furnish & Install 8-inch Limestone Base Under Curb As Needed 18.00 81,900.00 12.08 54,964.00 7.00 31,850.00 16.00 72,800.00 18.00 81,900.00 14 550 TN Furnish & Install HMAC Type C Patch 186.00 102,300.00 227.27 *124,998.50 216.00 118,800.00 207.00 113,850.00 180.00 99,000.00 15 300 SY Furnish & Install Concrete Driveway (High Early Strength Concrete) 75.00 22,500.00 60.00 18,000.00 90.00 27,000.00 93.00 27,900.00 210.00 63,000.00 16 70 SY Furnish & Install Concrete Sidewalk Connection 75.00 5,250.00 50.00 3,500.00 90.00 6,300.00 68.00 4,760.00 85.00 5,950.00 17 1,300 SY Install, Maintain & Establish Either Bermuda or St. Augustine Grass Sod 6.00 7,800.00 4.62 6,006.00 6.00 7,800.00 10.00 13,000.00 5.00 6,500.00 18 100%LS For Irrigation Repair Allowance by a Licensed Irrigator to be paid Repair Invoice plus 20% 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 19 100%LS For City of Georgetown Force Account 25,000.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 TOTAL PART A (Items 1 - 19)** Item Estimated Unit Bid Data No.Quantity Description PART B 1 100%LS Insurance, Bonds and Mobilization, not to exceed 5% of Total $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $500.00 $500.00 $5,645.00 $5,645.00 $3,800.00 $3,800.00 2 100%LS For Providing a Video DVD of the Project Area Prior to and After Construction 1,000.00 1,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 363.00 363.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 3 400 LF Provide Labor, Equipment, Tools and Supervision to Complete Preparation of Right-of-way 70.00 28,000.00 20.00 8,000.00 1.65 660.00 11.00 4,400.00 7.50 3,000.00 4 100%LS Preparation of Traffic Control Plan 3,000.00 3,000.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 2,471.00 2,471.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 5 100%LS Traffic Control Plan Implementation 2,500.00 2,500.00 1,800.00 1,800.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 3,294.00 3,294.00 5,500.00 5,500.00 6 200 SY Remove & Haul Off Existing Pavement 25.00 5,000.00 25.00 5,000.00 31.50 6,300.00 18.00 3,600.00 24.00 4,800.00 7 55 SY Remove & Haul Off Existing Concrete Driveway 45.00 2,475.00 36.36 1,999.80 31.50 1,732.50 27.00 1,485.00 17.00 935.00 8 90 SY Remove & Haul Off Existing Concrete Curb & Gutter 25.00 2,250.00 50.00 4,500.00 31.50 2,835.00 34.00 3,060.00 55.00 4,950.00 9 200 SY Furnish & Install 8" Base Material 18.00 3,600.00 25.00 5,000.00 7.00 1,400.00 24.00 4,800.00 26.00 5,200.00 10 200 SY Furnish & Install 2" Type D HMAC 20.00 4,000.00 30.00 6,000.00 24.84 4,968.00 30.00 6,000.00 65.00 13,000.00 11 25 TN Furnish & Install 2" Type C HMAC Patch 186.00 4,650.00 100.00 2,500.00 216.00 5,400.00 265.00 6,625.00 270.00 6,750.00 12 400 LF Furnish & Install Standard Curb & Gutter 20.00 8,000.00 37.00 14,800.00 40.00 16,000.00 31.00 12,400.00 23.00 9,200.00 13 25 SY Furnish & Install Concrete Valley Gutter 75.00 1,875.00 160.00 4,000.00 148.50 3,712.50 133.00 3,325.00 220.00 5,500.00 14 55 SY Install Concrete Driveway (High Early Strength Concrete)100.00 5,500.00 72.72 3,999.60 90.00 4,950.00 100.00 5,500.00 80.00 4,400.00 15 150 SY Install, Maintain & Establish Either Bermuda or St. Augustine Grass Sod 6.00 900.00 40.00 6,000.00 6.00 900.00 12.00 1,800.00 5.00 750.00 16 276 LF Furnish, Install & Removal of Silt Fence 2.50 690.00 5.43 1,498.68 1.00 276.00 7.00 1,932.00 3.00 828.00 17 1 EA Furnish, Install & Removal of Inlet Protection System 100.00 100.00 500.00 500.00 165.00 165.00 124.00 124.00 100.00 100.00 TOTAL PART B (Items 1 - 17) TOTAL PART A (Items 1 - 19)$588,350.00 $624,857.42 $653,430.00 $639,872.00 $684,750.00 TOTAL PART B (Items 1 - 17)$77,040.00 $73,598.08 $52,799.00 $66,824.00 $75,213.00 $665,390.00 $698,455.50 $706,229.00 $706,696.00 $759,963.00 Did Bidder Acknowledge Addendums No. 1 - No. 3? Did Bidder provide Section #00400? Did Bidder provide Section #00410? BID SUMMARY A Greater Austin Dev Co 6500 River Place Blvd., Bldg. 1, Ste. 201 Austin, TX 78730 684,750.00$ 75,213.00$ Extended Amount 77,040.00$ 73,598.08$ 52,799.00$ 66,824.00$ Unit Price Unit Price Extended Amount Taylor, TX 76574 Smithville, TX 78957 Le Center, MN 56057 Wimberly, TX 78676 588,350.00$ 624,857.42$ Extended Amount 653,430.00$ 639,872.00$ Patin Construction WJC Constructior Services Ti-Zac Concrete Meyers Concrete Co 3800 W. 2nd Street P.O. Box 104 39352 221st Ave P.O. Box 2928 Amount Unit Price Unit Price Extended Extended Amount Unit Price ExtendedUnit Price Extended Amount Unit Price BIDDER INFORMATION 6 7 8 9 10 Extended AmountAmount Unit Price Extended Amount Unit Price Extended Amount Unit Price YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES * Extended Amount Corrected **Total Amount Corrected 2 of 3 Page 66 of 67 BID TABULATION CITY OF GEORGETOWN TEXAS 2020 Curb and Gutter Replacement Project December 15, 2020; 2:00 PM 2019-153-40 Item Estimated Unit Bid Data No.Quantity Description PART A 1 100%LS Insurance, Bonds and Mobilization, not to exceed 5% of Total $19,000.00 $19,000.00 $40,000.00 $40,000.00 $32,500.00 32,500.00 2 100%LS For Providing a Video DVD of the Project Area Prior to and After Construction 500.00 500.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 3 37 STA Provide Labor, Equipment, Tools and Supervision to Complete Preparation of Right-of-way 640.00 23,680.00 80.00 2,960.00 1,500.00 55,500.00 4 100%LS Preparation of Traffic Control Plan 3,000.00 3,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 4,500.00 4,500.00 5 100%LS Traffic Control Plan Implementation 7,500.00 7,500.00 7,000.00 7,000.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 6 100%LS Prepare Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan, Including Submission to and Receiving Permits from Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ)3,000.00 3,000.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 7 3,200 LF Furnish, Install & Removal of Filter Sock 6.75 21,600.00 5.00 16,000.00 9.50 30,400.00 8 5 EA Furnish, Install & Removal of Inlet Protection System 65.00 325.00 100.00 500.00 100.00 500.00 9 2,250 CY For Unclassified Excavation of Existing Roadway, Including Asphalt, Base, & Material behind the Curb 28.00 63,000.00 11.00 24,750.00 22.00 49,500.00 10 6,900 LF For Removal & Haul Off of Existing Concrete Curb & Gutter & Driveway 4.00 27,600.00 15.00 103,500.00 12.00 82,800.00 11 5,650 LF Furnish & Install Standard Curb & Gutter 33.00 186,450.00 30.00 169,500.00 22.00 124,300.00 12 1,250 LF Furnish & Install 2-foot wide Driveway Laydown Curb (Driveway Valley Gutter) 31.00 38,750.00 30.00 37,500.00 30.00 37,500.00 13 4,550 SY Furnish & Install 8-inch Limestone Base Under Curb As Needed 28.00 127,400.00 56.00 254,800.00 18.00 81,900.00 14 550 TN Furnish & Install HMAC Type C Patch 155.00 85,250.00 200.00 110,000.00 225.00 123,750.00 15 300 SY Furnish & Install Concrete Driveway (High Early Strength Concrete) 161.00 48,300.00 105.00 31,500.00 108.00 32,400.00 16 70 SY Furnish & Install Concrete Sidewalk Connection 136.00 9,520.00 90.00 6,300.00 72.00 5,040.00 17 1,300 SY Install, Maintain & Establish Either Bermuda or St. Augustine Grass Sod 6.00 7,800.00 6.00 7,800.00 16.00 20,800.00 18 100%LS For Irrigation Repair Allowance by a Licensed Irrigator to be paid Repair Invoice plus 20% 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 19 100%LS For City of Georgetown Force Account 25,000.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 TOTAL PART A (Items 1 - 19) Item Estimated Unit Bid Data No.Quantity Description PART B 1 100%LS Insurance, Bonds and Mobilization, not to exceed 5% of Total $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 2 100%LS For Providing a Video DVD of the Project Area Prior to and After Construction 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 3 400 LF Provide Labor, Equipment, Tools and Supervision to Complete Preparation of Right-of-way 54.00 21,600.00 1.00 400.00 1,500.00 600,000.00 4 100%LS Preparation of Traffic Control Plan 3,000.00 3,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 4,500.00 4,500.00 5 100%LS Traffic Control Plan Implementation 2,500.00 2,500.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 6 200 SY Remove & Haul Off Existing Pavement 37.00 7,400.00 6.00 1,200.00 40.00 8,000.00 7 55 SY Remove & Haul Off Existing Concrete Driveway 63.00 3,465.00 35.00 1,925.00 25.00 1,375.00 8 90 SY Remove & Haul Off Existing Concrete Curb & Gutter 32.00 2,880.00 13.50 1,215.00 25.00 2,250.00 9 200 SY Furnish & Install 8" Base Material 28.00 5,600.00 56.00 11,200.00 22.00 4,400.00 10 200 SY Furnish & Install 2" Type D HMAC 40.00 8,000.00 35.00 7,000.00 48.00 9,600.00 11 25 TN Furnish & Install 2" Type C HMAC Patch 155.00 3,875.00 350.00 8,750.00 244.00 6,100.00 12 400 LF Furnish & Install Standard Curb & Gutter 33.00 13,200.00 30.00 12,000.00 21.00 8,400.00 13 25 SY Furnish & Install Concrete Valley Gutter 211.00 5,275.00 135.00 3,375.00 30.00 750.00 14 55 SY Install Concrete Driveway (High Early Strength Concrete)179.00 9,845.00 105.00 5,775.00 108.00 5,940.00 15 150 SY Install, Maintain & Establish Either Bermuda or St. Augustine Grass Sod 6.00 900.00 6.00 900.00 20.00 3,000.00 16 276 LF Furnish, Install & Removal of Silt Fence 2.00 552.00 5.00 1,380.00 3.00 828.00 17 1 EA Furnish, Install & Removal of Inlet Protection System 95.00 95.00 100.00 100.00 250.00 250.00 TOTAL PART B (Items 1 - 17) TOTAL PART A (Items 1 - 19)$717,675.00 $864,110.00 $758,890.00 $- $- TOTAL PART B (Items 1 - 17)$92,687.00 $63,220.00 $702,893.00 $- $- $810,362.00 $927,330.00 $1,461,783.00 $- $- Did Bidder Acknowledge Addendums No. 1 - No. 3? Did Bidder provide Section #00400? Did Bidder provide Section #00410? I hereby certify that this is a correct & true tabulation of all bids received Kasberg, Patrick & Associates, LP Alvin R. Sutton, III, P.E., CFM Date BID SUMMARY Joe Bland Construction 13111 Dessau Rd. Austin, TX 78754 717,675.00$ 92,687.00$ M&C Fonseca 1901 Prairie Creek Rd. Granite Shoals, TX 78654 864,110.00$ 63,220.00$ Unit Unit Price Extended HCS Inc 365 Wayside Dr. Waco, TX 76705 758,890.00$ 702,893.00$ 1405 E Rancier Ave., Suite 100 Killeen, TX 76541 BIDDER INFORMATION FCO Construction Services 11 12 13 14 NO N R E S P O N S I V E B I D US E D I N C O R R E C T B I D F O R M 15 Core Construction 10625 North County Rd. Frisco, TX 75033 NO N R E S P O N S I V E B I D US E D I N C O R R E C T B I D F O R M NO N R E S P O N S I V E B I D US E D I N C O R R E C T B I D F O R M NO N R E S P O N S I V E B I D US E D I N C O R R E C T B I D F O R M Price Extended Amount Unit Price Extended Amount Amount Unit Price Extended Amount Unit Price Extended Amount Extended Amount Unit Price Extended Amount Unit Price Extended Amount Unit Price Extended Amount Unit Price Extended Amount Unit Price YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES * Extended Amount Corrected **Total Amount Corrected 3 of 3 12-17-20 Page 67 of 67