HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda_GTAB_03.13.2015Notice of Meeting for the
Georgetown Transportation Advisory Board and the Governing Body
of the City of Georgetown
March 13, 2015 at 10:00 AM
at 300-1 Industrial Ave, Georgetown Texas 78626
The City of Georgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
If you require assistance in participating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the
ADA, reasonable assistance, adaptations, or accommodations will be provided upon request. Please
contact the City at least four (4) days prior to the scheduled meeting date, at (512) 930-3652 or City
Hall at 113 East 8th Street for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711.
Regular Session
(This Regular Session may, at any time, be recessed to convene an Executive Session for any purpose
authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code 551.)
A Call to Order
The Board may, at any time, recess the Regular Session to convene in Executive Session at the
request of the Chair, a Board Member, the City Manager, Assistant City Manager, General
Manager of Utilities, City Council Member, or legal counsel for any purpose authorized by the
Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code Chapter 551, and are subject to action in the
Regular Session that follows.
B Introduction of Visitors
C Industry/CAMPO/TXDOT Updates
D Discussion regarding the Project Progress Reports and Time Lines. – Bill Dryden, P.E.,
Transportation Engineer, Mark Miller, Transportation Services Manager, Nat Waggoner, PMP®,
Transportation Analyst and Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Transportation Services Director.
E Discussion regarding the Airport Project Progress Report and time lines. – Russ Volk, C.M.,
Airport Manager and Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Transportation Services Director
Legislative Regular Agenda
F Nominations and election of Vice-Chair of the GTAB Board. - Truman Hunt – Chair Person for
GTAB
G Nominations and election of Secretary of the GTAB Board. – Truman Hunt, GTAB Chair Person
H Review and possible action related to the Day and Time of GTAB Board Meetings. – Truman
Hunt, GTAB Chair Person
I Review and possible action to approve the minutes from the Regular GTAB Board meeting held
on February 13, 2015. - Jana Kern – GTAB Board Liaison
J Consideration and possible recommendation to approve an Agreement to Terminate Lease with
the Apollo Composite Squadron, Texas Wing, Civil Air Patrol—Russ Volk C.M., Airport
Manager and Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Transportation Services Director
K Consideration and possible recommendation to GTEC for approval of the 2015/2016
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)– Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Transportation Services
Director, and Nat Waggoner, PMP®, Transportation Analyst.
Adjournment
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
I, Jessica Brettle, City Secretary for the City of Georgetown, Texas, do hereby certify that this Notice
of Meeting was posted at City Hall, 113 E. 8th Street, a place readily accessible to the general public
at all times, on the ______ day of __________________, 2015, at __________, and remained so
posted for at least 72 continuous hours preceding the scheduled time of said meeting.
____________________________________
Jessica Brettle, City Secretary
City of Georgetown, Texas
Transportation Advisory Board
March 13, 2015
SUBJECT:
Discussion regarding the Project Progress Reports and Time Lines. – Bill Dryden, P.E.,
Transportation Engineer, Mark Miller, Transportation Services Manager, Nat Waggoner, PMP®,
Transportation Analyst and Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Transportation Services Director.
ITEM SUMMARY:
GTAB Projects:
Austin Avenue Bridge Evaluation and Repairs
FM 971 Realignment at Austin Avenue
FM 1460 Improvements Project
OTP Update
Sidewalk Master Plan
Southwest Bypass Project (TIP #14C)
Transit Study as Requested by City Council
Transportation Services Operations – CIP Maintenance
GTEC Projects:
Project Update and Status Report
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None
SUBMITTED BY:
Bill Dryden, P.E., Transportation Engineeer
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
GTAB Projects Updates Exhibit
GTEC Project Status Report Exhibit
Austin Avenue – Bridge Evaluations
(North and South San Gabriel Rivers)
Project No. TBD TIP Project No. N/A
March 2015
Unchanged
Project Description Evaluate the repairs necessary to restore full structural capacity to the Austin Avenue
bridges over the North and South San Gabriel Rivers. The process will involve several
phases – I) determination of testing needed, II) structural testing, analyses and
evaluation of test data to determine/recommend corrective measures and a project
budget, III) develop construction plans, specifications and contract documents,
estimates of probable construction costs and, last, IV) construction administration.
Purpose To extend the structural life of the two bridge and provide long‐term vehicular
capacity and pedestrian safety along Austin Avenue.
Project Manager Bill Dryden, P.E.
Engineer Aguirre & Fields, LP
Element Status / Issues
Design Staff met with Engineer and discussed potential courses of action. There are four basic
paths to consider: Do Nothing. Short Term Temporary Fix. Medium Term Fix. Replace
Structure.
Engineer has developed 2 potential conceptual alignments for the proposed
reconstruction of the bridge.
Surveying TBD
Environmental TBD during Phase II
Rights of Way Prop. ROW from 3rd Street to N. of 2nd; Exist. ROW from N. of 2nd to Morrow Street.
Utility Reloc’ns TBD (future)
Construction TBD
Other Issues Project submitted for CAMPO funding;
Project eligible for TxDOT Off‐System Bridge Replacement Program.
FM 971 at Austin Avenue
Realignment Intersection Improvements
Project No. 1BZ TIP No. QQ1
March 2015
Unchanged
Project Description Design and preparation of final plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E) for the widening
and realignment of FM 971 at Austin Avenue, eastward to Gann Street.
Purpose To provide a new alignment consistent with the alignment of the proposed Northwest
Boulevard Bridge over IH 35; to allow a feasible, alternate route from the west side of I 35 to
Austin Avenue, to Georgetown High School, to San Gabriel Park and a more direct route to
SH 130.
Project Managers Bill Dryden, P.E.
Engineer Klotz Associates, Inc.
Element Status / Issues
Design Preliminary Engineering complete;
Engineer working on 60% design submittal
Environmental/
Archeological
10/2015
Rights of Way Complete
Utility Relocations TBD
Construction 10/2016
Other Issues Working with TxDOT to develop an Advance Funding Agreement for plans review
and construction administration.
FM 1460
Quail Valley Drive to University Drive
Project No. 5RB TIP No. EEa, EEb & EEc
March 2015
Project Description Design and preparation of plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E) for the widening and
reconstruction of FM 1460. Project will include review and update to existing Schematic,
Right‐of‐Way Map and Environmental Document and completion of the PS&E for the
remaining existing roadway.
Purpose To keep the currently approved environmental documents active; purchase ROW, effect
utility relocations/clearance and to provide on‐the‐shelf PS&E for TxDOT letting not later
than August 2013, pending available construction funding.
Project Managers Ed Polasek, AICP and Bill Dryden, P.E.
Engineer Brown and Gay Engineers, Inc.
Element Status / Issues
Design Complete
Environmental/
Archeological
Complete
Rights of Way As of October 16th, the City has obtained Possession and
Use Agreements or have closings planned for all the
remaining FM 1460 parcels.
Acquired: 34
Pending: 0
Condemnation: 2
Total: 36
Utility Relocations Ongoing.
Construction Bid opened August 2014
Construction scheduled to commence Spring 2015.
Other Issues None Pending
Overall Transportation Plan Update
March 2015
Project Description The updated OTP is a continuation of the effort that the City completed in 2004
with the adoption of the initial OTP. That document provided an analysis of
existing conditions and travel characteristics, a refined area‐wide travel demand
model, review of the City’s roadway functional classification system and a revised
Thoroughfare Plan.
Project Managers Ed Polasek, AICP, Bill Dryden, P.E., Nat Waggoner, PMP® and Jordan Maddox,
AICP
Engineer Klotz Associates, Inc.
Element Status / Issues
Key
Accomplishments
DRAFT OTP has been:
Presented to GTAB at its January 9th meeting.
Presented at Council Workshop on January 13th.
Presented to P&Z for review and comments January 20th.
Presented to GTAB on February 13th.
Presented to Council on February 24th for First Reading of the Ordinance fro
adoption.
Upcoming Tasks Staff:
• Will present 2nd Reading of Ordinance adopting the OTP March 10th.
Issues Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO) has not yet adopted
the 2040 Regional Transportation Plan nor the 2010 Travel Demand Model
supporting that plan. When adopted in May 2015, the 2040 plan and model will
provide key data which will allow supporting jurisdictions the opportunity to
update their transportation plans. Georgetown transportation planning efforts
will benefit from updated modeling data and should pursue funding to update the
2012 data currently informing the OTP.
Sidewalk Master Plan and Public Facility Access Audit
March 2015
Purpose The purpose of the City of Georgetown Sidewalk Study and Public Facility Access
Audit is to inventory existing public infrastructure within the City of Georgetown City
Limits, identify design and compliance deficiencies, evaluate future program
requirements, and develop a long term implementation plan.
Project
Manager
Nat Waggoner, PMP®
Engineer HDR, Inc.
Task Status / Issues
Initiation - Completed
Planning - Completed
Execution - See below
Task Name Start End
ADA Reporting Criteria for Sidewalk Analysis May-14 Jun-14
Comprehensive Review of Existing Studies, Plans, and
Reports
May-14 Jun-14
Self-Assessment Survey of Downtown District May-14 Jul-14
Data Collection and Field Inventory Jun-14 Aug-14
City Facilities Survey Jul-14 Sep-14
Sidewalk Implementation Plan and Project Prioritization May-14 Oct-14
Parks and Amenities Survey Nov-14 Feb-14
Government and Public Stakeholder Meetings May-14 Jan-15
Public Meetings and Hearings Periodic
thru
Mar-15
ADA Transition Plan Update to Council Targeting Apr-15 Ongoing
Project Close Out Activities Targeting Mar-15 Ongoing
10 Yr. Recommended Implementation Strategy Funding Needed
Priority 1 Projects $10.2 M
Operations and Maintenance $5 M
Replacement and Retirement (Recommended in 2025) $8 M
ADA Outstanding Tasks
MAR –Staff input complete
APR –Boards, Commissions and Council review
MAY –Adoption
Issues
Implementation of Priority 1 projects and budget requests for operations and maintenance will
involve boards and commissions, including GTAB.
Guidance Needed
At the 1st Reading on February 24th, Councilmember Hesser asked staff to further investigate
ownership and maintenance policies for sidewalks. Staff is coordinating with the Planning
Department for possible inclusion in the UDC amendment process and is looking for guidance from
GTAB as to inclusion in as a regular agenda item.
Southwest Bypass Project
(RM 2243 to IH 35)
Project No. 1CA Project No. 14c
March 2015
Unchanged
Project Description Develop a Design Schematic for the Southwest Bypass from Leander Road (RM 2243) to IH
35 in the ultimate configuration and Construction Plans, Specifications and Estimate (PS&E)
for construction of approximately 1.5 miles of interim 2‐lane roadway from Leander Road
(RM 2243) to its intersection with the existing Inner Loop underpass at IH 35. The portion
from Leander Road to the east property line of Texas Crushed Stone is a GTAB Project; from
the east line to the existing Inner Loop underpass at IH 35 is being funded by GTEC.
Purpose To extend an interim portion of the SH 29 Bypass, filling in between Leander Road (RM
2243) to IH 35 Southbound Frontage Road.
Project Manager Williamson County
City Contact: Ed Polasek, AICP and Bill Dryden, P.E.
Engineer HDR, Inc.
Element Status / Issues
Design Engineer is in preliminary engineering and schematic design phase of the facility.
Alignment has been presented to staff and management.
Surveying City stall met with the Surveyor to resolve a conflict in the proposed ROW to be
acquired from Texas Crushed Stone.
Environmental/
Archeological
TBD by preliminary engineering phase.
Rights of Way Conceptually established by the Industrial Agreement; will be refined through the
schematic design phase.
Negotiations ongoing for the remainder of the ROW
Utility Relocations TBD (future)
Construction This project included in the Williamson County 2013 Bond Program to construct 2
lanes of the ultimate roadway.
Other Issues None
Transit Study
as Requested by City Council
Project No. None Project No. None
March 2015
Unchanged
Project
Description
Council Motion: Discussion and possible direction to the City of Georgetown's Transportation
Advisory Board (GTAB) to conduct an analysis and make a recommendation to the City Council
no later than June 24, 2014 ,regarding the City's potential future participation in State and
Regional Transportation Organizations including the benefits, conditions, and justification which
would prompt the City's participation in Project Connect, Lone Star Rail and any other relevant
State and Regional Transportation Organizations that the City should be involved with -- Steve
Fought, Councilmember, District 4
Amended Motion:
1. The City Manager to determine what time and effort staff have available to conduct this type
of study over the next year. If it is not in the Transportation Division, Planning Department,
Finance Department and/or City Manager’s Office work program, as outlined in the current
draft budget, can it be adequately staffed to complete this level of work over the next year?
2. Is the challenge to research Federal, State and Regional transportation organizations or is it
transit programs? This direction to staff is assuming it is transit programs.
3. Narrow the specific analysis to programs that are actually authorized to receive Federal
formula and discretionary funding programs found within the current Federal Transit
Administration. However, that would narrow the field down to three agencies or programs.
Capital Metro, Lone Star Rail and the State of Texas through the Texas Department of
Transportation. CARTS is only a contractor to Capital Metro and provides certain 5310
transit opportunities to persons outside of the Capital Metro Service Area in our jurisdiction.
CAMPO, Project Connect, Project Connect North and My35 are simply planning programs
that include staff from Capital Metro, Lone Star Rail District, and TxDOT and
representatives from local governments.
4. The analysis should be based on how those planning programs will lead to funding through
the project delivery agencies. (Fought amended to include financial risk and benefits to the City)
5. The Council should provide the Board and staff specifics on what type of economic analysis
data will lead to an ultimate decision by the City Council.
6. Finally, some people ‘can’t see what the final project would look like’ or ‘can’t see what a
Transit Oriented Development would look like.’ Years ago, when the City was looking at
transportation options and creating a TOD ordinance, there was a field trip to perform some
on the ground research. Members of the City Council, Planning and Zoning, and staff
(GTAB was not in existence at the time) went and stayed at a TOD to see for themselves.
We should have at least one field trip during this study. Since it has been about 8 years or
so since that first and only field trip, it should be extremely informative to do it again and
see what a TOD looks like today and how the project has performed over the years.
Vote on the original motion as amended: Approved (6-1) (Hesser opposed)
Project
Manager
Ed Polasek, AICP
Engineer TBD
Project Status Workplan Under Development
Transportation Services Operations
CIP Maintenance
March 2015
Project Description 2014‐2015 CIP Maintenance of roadways including, Chip seal, Cutler Overlays,
Fog seal applications and Engineering design of future rehabilitation projects.
Purpose To provide protection and maintain an overall pavement condition index of
85%.
Project Manager Mark Miller
Engineer/Engineers KPA, Steger Bizzell, Halff Assoc.
Task Status / Issues
2nd and 6th Street
Engineering
(KPA) 2nd St. to College St. plans are complete. Advertising, bidding and
construction will coincide with Parks and Recreation VFW Field
reconstruction project in approximately June / July minimizing disruption to
baseball season and to residents.
9th Street
(Main to Rock)
(KPA) (Patin Construction) Austin to Rock portion 98% completed. Electric
conduit is in place. Patin is scheduled to return on March 25th and still plans
to complete project on schedule. (Before the end of April / Poppy Festival)
Chip Seal 2015 proposed to be bid April 1st and brought to April 10th GTAB with
construction complete by August 30th.
Fog Seal 2015 Fog sealing will be completed in‐house. In‐house engineering is being
provided for specified streets. Engineering under way and fog sealing will be
completed prior to mid‐June or as temperature allow. Temperatures much
above 80 degrees slows dry time.
Cutler/overlay 2015 proposed Cutler Overlays Proposed to be bid on April 1st and brought to
April 10th GTAB with construction complete by October 1st.
Pavement
Evaluation
KPA Engineering: pavement evaluation/scoring and update of 5 year
(Complete)
Current Capital Improvement Projects TIP
No.
Project
No.
Update On Schedule/
Or Behind
Project
Budget
Project
Cost
Available Current Year
Projected
Current Year
Cost
Current Year
Available
Wolf Ranch Parkway Extension (SW Bypass to DB
Wood Road)
#14A 5QW Engineer is completing the fencing plans, its
required environmental clearance documents
(to determine the fee for WCCF) and the
construction PS&E bidding package.
ROW has been acquired.
On Schedule
Unchanged
1,330,000 1,111,233 218,767 283,350 0 283,350
Southwest Bypass (SH29 to RR2243)#14B 5QC Engineer has completed the project PS&E, less
construction contract documents and
environmental permitting required at time of actual
construction.
ROW Acquisition process moving to
condemnation for the Weir Trust properties.
Guy/Knight property – Closing pending
Wolf property – Acquisition complete.
On Schedule
Unchanged
7,756,432 3,225,132 4,531,300 4,539,107 5,787 4,533,320
Northwest Blvd Overpass #QQ 5QX Engineer has presented the Preliminary
Engineering Report and has begun final PS&E
design efforts.
Engineer is developing ROW strip map and
In-process
Unchanged
1,136,178 1,099,076 37,102 571,178 479,588 91,590
NB Frontage Road (SS 158 to Lakeway)#QQ 5QY Staff and Engineer has met with TxDOT personnel
at both the local Area Office and District
Environmental Division.
In-process
Unchanged
613,822 613,822 0 382,822 382,822 0
ROW - 1460 #EEa
#EEb
#EEc
5RB Construction scheduled to begin in February
2015.
Utility coordination on-going as ROW is acquired.
All appraisals are complete. Final offers have
been made for all ROW parcels.
The paperwork has been filed for all parcels
requiring condemnation.
As of October 16th, the City has obtained
Possession and Use Agreements or have
closings planned within the next couple
weeks for all the remaining FM 1460
parcels.
Utility Relocation Agreements were approved by
Council at its October 28th
meeting
On Schedule 11,788,230 5,348,470 6,439,760 6,727,539 2,315,896 4,411,643
Rivery Boulevard 5RM Surveying and preliminary design underway.
On Schedule
Snead Drive 5QZ PS&E is complete;
Awaiting ROW for water quality pond.
On Schedule
Unchanged
825,100 87,000 738,100 825,100 87,000 738,100
Mays Street Extension 5RI Engineering has submitted the proposed
alignment and is working on the 30%PS&E.
On Schedule
Unchanged
196,000 196,000 0 196,000 196,000 0
IH 35/ Hwy 29 Intersection 5RJ TBD 650,000 0 650,000 650,000 0 650,000
Current Economic Development Projects Project
Type
Update On Schedule/
Or Behind
Project
Budget
Project
Cost
Available Current Year
Budget
Current Year
Cost
Current Year
Available
Economic Development Projects 1,137,500 1,137,500 1,137,500 0 1,137,500
16,062,596 3,467,093 12,595,503
Project to Date Current Year Budget (13/14)
GTEC PROJECT UPDATE AND STATUS REPORT
March 2105
Project to Date Current Year Budget (13/14)
L:\Global\CIP Agenda Form\GTEC Status Report\2015\GTEC - Project Status - 2015-02.xlsx Page 1 of 1 3/5/2015
City of Georgetown, Texas
Transportation Advisory Board
March 13, 2015
SUBJECT:
Discussion regarding the Airport Project Progress Report and time lines. – Russ Volk, C.M.,
Airport Manager and Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Transportation Services Director
ITEM SUMMARY:
Airport Projects:
CIP - Air Field Electrical Improvements Development and Timeline
FAA Tower Report
Fuel Sales Report
Hangar Lease Update
Tie-Down Lease Update
AirFest Economic Impact Analysis
Airport Monthly Financial
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
NA
SUBMITTED BY:
Russ Volk
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Airport Project Update Backup Material
Tower Report Backup Material
Fuel Sales Report Backup Material
Hangar Update Backup Material
Tie-Down Update Backup Material
AirFest EIA Cover Memo
Airport Financial Backup Material
Airfield Electrical Improvements
Project No. 1414GRGTN
March 2015
Project Description FY2014 project: Runways / taxiways lighting and signage
Purpose Improved safety and reliability of airport lighting
Project Manager Russ Volk, Airport Manager
Project Engineer Garver
Notes:
Feb 24 –Started boring under each runway for new electrical conduit and wiring
Estimated timeframe - 5 days
Mar 1 – Trenching and light replacement on Runway 18/36
Estimated timeframe - 30 to 45 days
Georgetown Municipal Airport Contract Tower Program Update
March 2015
Project Description Georgetown Tower Update
Purpose Tower Monthly Report
Project Manager Russ Volk, Airport Manager
Operating Statistics
Performance/volumetric
indicators
For the Month of:
January 2015
January
2014
Y-T-D
January
2015
Y-T-D
Variance
Take Offs and
Landings Day*
Night*
VFR 3,503
1,468 21,614 20,314
(1,300) -6%
IFR 340
130 1,869 2,293
424 23%
Total Take
Offs/Landings 3,843
1,598 23,483 22,607
(876) -4%
* This does not include flyover operations (i.e. handoffs from ABIA approach/departure
control to KGTU tower then onto the next ATC.).
Georgetown Municipal Airport Fuel Sales Update
March 2015
Project Description Georgetown Fuel Sales Update
Purpose Fuel Sales Monthly Report
Project Manager Russ Volk, Airport Manager
Operating Statistics
Performance/volumetric
indicators
Gallons For the Month of:
January
January
2014
Y-T-D
January
2015
Y-T-D
Variance
Type of Fuel 2014 2015
AVGAS 18,934
23,008 72,695 83,206
10,511 14%
JET A 33,848
38,404
137,476 150,282
12,806 9%
Total Gallons Sold 52,782
61,412
210,171 233,488
23,317 11%
Airport Hangar Lease Update
March 2015
Project Description Hangar Lease Agreements
Purpose Implement new lease agreements with approved rates
Project Manager Russ Volk, Airport Manager
Notes
Feb 8 –Started contacting existing hangar tenants to verify airplane ownership
Feb 15 –Started contacting existing hangar tenants to offer new lease agreement with new rates
Feb 15 –Started contacting folks on waiting list to offer new leases on vacant hangars
April 1 – Target date for switching to new lease agreements and having all vacant hangars filled
Unit Stats
Total Hangars – 114 (30 new leases executed)
Total Storage Units – 13
Used by Airport Staff – 3 (1 Hangar, 2 Storage)
Airport Tie-Down Lease Update
March 2015
Project Description Tie-Down Lease Agreements
Purpose Implement new lease agreements with approved rates
Project Manager Russ Volk, Airport Manager
Notes
Feb 20 –Obtained new tie-down agreement from City Attorney’s Office
Feb 23 – Started contacting existing tie-down tenants
April 1 – Target date for switching to new agreements
Unit Stats
Total Tie-Downs – 43
Available for Long Term Lease - 29
Transient / Overnight Spaces – 14 (7 on concrete, 7 on grass)
G e o r g e t o w n A i r F e s t E c o n o m i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s
Economic Impact Analysis:
AirFest
Georgetown, Texas
November 8, 2014
Prepared by:
Sarah T. Page Consulting, LLC
December 2014
G e o r g e t o w n A i r F e s t E c o n o m i c I m p a c t
A n a l y s i s
Page 1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. 1
List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ 2
Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 3
About AirFest ............................................................................................................................... 3
Total Economic Impact ........................................................................................................... 3
Methodology .............................................................................................................................. 4
Data Provided and Model Assumptions ............................................................................. 6
IMPLAN and Retail Impacts .................................................................................................... 6
Economic Impact Definitions ................................................................................................. 7
Economic Benefits to Georgetown ...................................................................................... 8
AirFest Community Capture Impacts (Local spending) ............................................... 10
About Community Capture Spending .............................................................................. 11
Origin of AirFest Attendees ................................................................................................... 14
Local vs. Non-local Attendee Spending Comparison .................................................. 15
Return on Investment .............................................................................................................. 16
Sales Tax Impact ...................................................................................................................... 17
Conclusion ................................................................................................................................. 18
Open-Ended Responses – Attendees ................................................................................ 19
IMPLAN and Economic Impact Modeling........................................................................ 31
About Sarah T. Page Consulting, LLC ................................................................................ 31
Appendix 1 – Attendee Survey ............................................................................................ 32
List of Tables
Table 1: Summary of Total Economic Impacts ............................................................. 8
Table 2: Summary of Food and Beverage Impacts (Includes restaurants and
drinking places) ......................................................................................................... 8
Table 3: Summary of Retail Impacts (Includes general retail, vendors, grocery
stores, and other retail) ............................................................................................. 8
Table 4: Summary of Transportation Impacts (Includes purchases made on
gasoline and motor oil) ............................................................................................ 8
G e o r g e t o w n A i r F e s t E c o n o m i c I m p a c t
A n a l y s i s
Page 2
Table 5: Summary of Tourist Attractions Impacts (Includes natural and man-
made visitor attractions) ........................................................................................... 8
Table 6: Summary of Total Community Capture Impacts ........................................ 10
Table 7: Summary of Community Capture Food and Beverage Impacts (Includes
restaurants and drinking places) .......................................................................... 10
Table 8: Summary of Community Capture Retail Impacts (Includes general retail,
vendors, grocery stores, and other retail)............................................................ 10
Table 9: Summary of Community Capture Transportation Impacts (Includes
purchases made on gasoline and motor oil) ..................................................... 10
Table 10: Summary of Community Capture Tourist Attraction Impacts (Includes
natural and man-made visitor attractions) ......................................................... 11
Table 11: Local vs. Non-local Spending Comparison ............................................... 15
Table 12: What did you like best about AirFest? ........................................................ 20
Table 13: What changes or additions would you like to see at AirFest next year?
.................................................................................................................................... 23
Table 14: What other thoughts or comments do you have about AirFest? .......... 26
Table 15: How many times have you visited the Georgetown Municipal Airport?
.................................................................................................................................... 28
Table 16: What would bring you back to the Georgetown Municipal Airport? ... 28
List of Figures
Figure 1: Impacts by Spending Category ................................................................... 12
Figure 2: Employment Impacts by Spending Category ........................................... 12
Figure 3: Labor Income Impacts by Spending Category ......................................... 13
Figure 4: Average Per Person Per Day Spending by Spending Category ............. 13
Figure 5: Map - Attendees by County ......................................................................... 14
Figure 6: Map - Attendees by Zip Code ...................................................................... 15
Figure 9: How did you hear about AirFest? (Non-Local attendees) ....................... 19
Figure 10: How did you hear about AirFest? (Local attendees) .............................. 20
Figure 11: SurveyMonkey Attendee Email Survey Branding ..................................... 34
Figure 12: SurveyMonkey Attendee Email #1 Preview .............................................. 34
Figure 13: SurveyMonkey Attendee Email #2 Preview .............................................. 35
Figure 14: SurveyMonkey Attendee Email #3 Preview .............................................. 35
G e o r g e t o w n A i r F e s t E c o n o m i c I m p a c t
A n a l y s i s
Page 3
Executive Summary
The City of Georgetown contracted with Sarah T. Page
Consulting, LLC to provide an economic impact analysis
on AirFest held on November 8, 2014 at Georgetown
Municipal Airport. The project was designed to
determine the economic impact of the event on the local
economy, the impact of spending by local residents, and
return on investment.
Sarah T. Page Consulting, LLC evaluated the impacts
utilizing IMPLAN, an econometric model designed by the
University of Minnesota. The model is used to determine
the increased spending associated with new business
investment, and with local festivals, events, and
tournaments.
About AirFest
AirFest was held November 8, 2014 at the Georgetown
Municipal Airport. The free event included static displays
of aircraft, rides in helicopters and other aircraft, radio-
controlled plane and helicopter demonstrations, take offs
and landings, a fly-over, car show, demonstrations, and
food vendors. AirFest is in its 5th year and has grown in
popularity and attendance each year. An estimated 7,000
people attended this year’s AirFest.
Total Economic Impact
Economic impact can be calculated in several different
ways. IMPLAN produces an economic impact that is
highly accurate, but also dependant on the accuracy of
the data that is entered into it. In other words, the
economic impacts that come out of the mod el are only as
good as the data that goes into it. Thus, we outline
several assumptions and the data provided in a section
below.
The resulting economic impacts from an IMPLAN analysis
are an accurate, yet very conservative projection of the
impact an event had on a community. The results are
Economic Impact Results
Our analysis suggests the
following key findings:
■ The total economic impact
of AirFest on Georgetown
was $103,192 - $127,035.
■ The economic impact to
local restaurants and
drinking places was
$57,336, the retail impact
was $19,629, the impact to
local tourist attractions was
$24,262, and the
transportation impact was
$1,964. There was no
impact on local lodging
providers.
■ An estimated 1.4 full time
equivalent (FTE) jobs were
created.
■ There were an estimated
7,000 festival attendees.
Of these, 4,480 were non-
local and 2,520 were local.
■ The average non-local party
size was 4.4 people, and
the average length of stay
in Georgetown was 1.2
days.
■ The average non-local per
person per day spending
was $23.63.
G e o r g e t o w n A i r F e s t E c o n o m i c I m p a c t
A n a l y s i s
Page 4
“bankable” – they are not inflated or exaggerated in any way. However, when compared to
impacts from other events that tout impacts in the tens of millions of dollars, IMPLAN’s impacts
can seem low.
For this reason, we are including a range for the total
economic impact of AirFest. All the detailed analysis
was conducted using IMPLAN. Only the total
economic impact figure is stated in a range.
IMPLAN’s total economic impact for the event is $103,192. By multiplying the estimated non-
local attendance (4,480) by the average number of days spent in Georgetown (1.2 days) and
by the per person per day spending figure of $23.63, the high end of the impact range is
established at $127,035.
Both impacts listed above represent the economic impact of the event. This is the impact of
direct spending by visitors to Georgetown as a result of attending AirFest. The impacts do not
represent the fiscal impact, which is the tax revenue generated from visitor spending. Fiscal
impact was not calculated as a component of this study. Both impacts are correct, but simply
use different methods to calculate. Either may be reported with confidence.
Methodology
A Survey Team consisting of roughly 2 volunteers collected Email addresses so that the survey
could be sent electronically using SurveyMonkey. A self-service box was also available for
attendees to enter their name and email address. Surveying was conducted throughout the
day Saturday from 12 noon until 5pm. Thus, all attendees would have an equal opportunity to
be surveyed.
Volunteers “intercepted” festival attendees, explained the study process, and asked for an
Email address. The Survey Team was asked to collect Email addresses from as many attendees
as possible. Following the festival, an Email survey was sent to all who provided a valid email
address via the web-based survey tool called SurveyMonkey. A $100 Visa gift card was offered
to those who completed the survey to incentivize
their participation.
Three Emails were sent to participating festival
attendees using SurveyMonkey. The first Email
was delivered to 229 attendees on November 17,
2014. On November 20, 2014, a reminder Email
was sent to those who had not yet responded
(135). A final reminder Email was delivered to the remaining non -respondents on November
22, 2014 (106). Out of the 229 total surveys that were delivered, 131 were returned for a 57%
response rate. This response rate exceeded industry standards.
“My kids rode in a plane for
the very first time!”
“The joy on people's faces!
Seeing the planes, the precision
flying team, the music, car show,
vendors, and knowing that
everyone could afford to attend.”
G e o r g e t o w n A i r F e s t E c o n o m i c I m p a c t
A n a l y s i s
Page 5
The data was tabulated by Sarah T. Page Consulting, LLC, and analyzed using IMPLAN to
produce the impacts. IMPLAN, developed Minnesota Implan Group (MIG), calculated the
economic impact created by expenditures from non-
local attendees. The model uses economic theory
combined with historical trends to anticipate changes
in direct, indirect and induced employment and
income generated due to the presence of a new
business or industry. In this case, the new industry is an event. The “community capture”
impacts, or impacts of local spending, were also analyzed using IMPLAN.
IMPLAN is an input/output model that is based on economic factors attributed to a specific
county or region. In this analysis, Williamson County was used as the basis for determining the
impacts.
The specific methodology is outlined below:
1. Only spending by non-local attendees was used to determine the economic impact.
Local participants were identified by zip code and were eliminated from the economic
impact analysis.
2. Only spending by local attendees (those from zip codes 78626, 78628, and 78633) was
used to calculate the community capture impacts.
3. The non-local sample size of 75 represented 334 attendees, or 64% of the total number
of attendees surveyed, and the local sample size of 55 represented 185 attendees, or
36% of the total. These percentages were then applied to the total estimated number
of attendees at AirFest (7,000). Thus, an estimated 4,480 non-local and 2,520 local
people attended the Georgetown AirFest.
4. Based on data gathered from the surveys, there were 519 total people represented in
the data collection, of which 334 were non-local and 185 were local.
5. The per person per day spending figure was determined using the total spending in each
spending category and the total number of people in the travel parties.
6. The per person per day spending figure for each spending category was entered into an
IMPLAN model built to represent the local inputs and outputs of Williamson County.
7. The IMPLAN model reduces the impact of retail spending because it analyzes impacts on
the retail margin rather than the total sale price (see “IMPLAN and Retail Impacts”
below for an explanation.)
8. The total number of non-local attendees (4,480) was multiplied by 1.2 (the average
number of days stayed in Georgetown according to the survey results) for the total
number of attendee days of 5,376.
“AirFest is so much fun. The
vendors, cars and volunteers
are all great!”
G e o r g e t o w n A i r F e s t E c o n o m i c I m p a c t
A n a l y s i s
Page 6
9. The average number of days spent in Georgetown by local residents was 1.1 days. Thus,
the total number of local attendee days was 2,772.
10. The total number non-local visitor days of 5,376 was used to determine final economic
impacts within the IMPLAN model.
Data Provided and Model Assumptions
1. The estimated total attendance at the Georgetown AirFest was 7,000 people.
2. The study used a convenience sample to project the economic impacts.
3. The non-local sample size (75) used to determine the economic impact was too low to
fall within the +/- 5% degree of accuracy range for this analysis. A sample of 370 non-
local surveys would be needed to achieve a +/- 5% degree of accuracy for a non-local
attendance of 7,000.
4. The economic impact results were based on non-local (outside of Georgetown) zip
codes only.
5. The spending patterns of the 334 non-local attendees represent the total number of
5,376 (attendee days).
IMPLAN and Retail Impacts
The IMPLAN software model was updated in 2011, and the data sets (inputs and outputs) were
updated in 2012. These revisions included many changes, but one is particularly relevant to
economic impact analyses on festivals and events that include retail spending. Very few of the
goods purchased by visitors to Williamson County are actually produced there. For most sales,
only the retail margin (the difference between final sale price and the wholesale cost of the
item) is retained in the city or county. Retail margins can be as low as 20-30 percent of the
total sales price for purchases made
at general merchandise stores.
Previous IMPLAN versions allowed
total retail sales to be used when
calculating economic impact. This
resulted in an over-reporting of the
total economic impact. The impact on local retail outlets was inflated as well. The updated
version of IMPLAN uses only the retail margin in conducting an economic impact analysis. The
results are a more accurate picture of the actual economic impact on the community.
“I actually think you should charge an
admission to get in or at least parking.
Seems odd that such entertainment is free.”
G e o r g e t o w n A i r F e s t E c o n o m i c I m p a c t
A n a l y s i s
Page 7
Thus, it is important to recognize the difference between total retail sales and the impact of
that sale on the community. The economic impact is measured on the basis of the retail margin
and not the total retail sale. Retail sales and retail impacts are two very different
measurements and are not equivalent. Because IMPLAN measures the impacts of retail
margins, the resulting retail impacts can seem low.
Economic Impact Definitions
In order to fully understand the tables on pages 9 and 11 of this report, some definitions of key
economic impact terms are provided below.
Direct Economic Impact: The total amount of additional spending which can be directly
attributed to this event.
Total Economic Impact: Total economic impact is a measure of direct economic impact
plus the additional spending in the host economy as a result of
increased business from this event. It includes indirect and
induced impacts (see below).
Indirect Impacts: These are the impacts of local industries buying goods and
services from other local industries.
Induced Impacts: These are the impacts a local economy feels as a result of re-
spending of income received while being employed during this
event.
Output: Output represents the value of industry production. Output is
essentially sales/spending.
Labor Income: All forms of employment income, including Employee
Compensation (wages and benefits) and Proprietor Income.
FTEs: Full-time equivalent employment is the number of full-time
equivalent jobs, defined as total hours worked divided by average
annual hours worked in full-time jobs.
Employment: In the tables on the following pages, employment indicates the
number of FTEs generated by this event.
G e o r g e t o w n A i r F e s t E c o n o m i c I m p a c t
A n a l y s i s
Page 8
Economic Benefits to Georgetown
AirFest Impacts
Economic Impact (Impact from non-local spending)
Table 1: Summary of Total Economic Impacts
Total Economic Impact
Direct Economic Impact Total Economic Impact
Output $82,313 $103,192
Labor Income $24,271 $32,056
Employment 1.2 1.4
Table 2: Summary of Food and Beverage Impacts (Includes restaurants and drinking places)
Food and Beverage & Food Services Economic Impact
Direct Economic Impact Total Economic Impact
Output $45,427 $57,336
Labor Income $16,679 $21,170
Employment 0.7 0.9
Table 3: Summary of Retail Impacts (Includes general retail, vendors, grocery stores, and other retail)
Retail/Shopping Economic Impact
Direct Economic Impact Total Economic Impact
Output $15,915 $19,629
Labor Income $5,547 $6,904
Employment 0.3 0.3
Table 4: Summary of Transportation Impacts (Includes purchases made on gasoline and motor oil)
Transportation Economic Impact
Direct Economic Impact Total Economic Impact
Output $1,510 $1,964
Labor Income $741 $907
Employment 0 0
Table 5: Summary of Tourist Attractions Impacts (Includes natural and man-made visitor attractions)
Tourist Attraction Economic Impact
Direct Economic Impact Total Economic Impact
Output $19,461 $24,262
Labor Income $1,305 $3,075
Employment 0.2 0.2
G e o r g e t o w n A i r F e s t E c o n o m i c I m p a c t
A n a l y s i s
Page 9
Note: Indirect and induced impacts, or value-added, are not depicted in the tables above. These
secondary impacts result from circulation of the initial spe nding through the local economy. The
value-added impacts combined with the direct impacts form the total impact shown in the
tables above.
G e o r g e t o w n A i r F e s t E c o n o m i c I m p a c t
A n a l y s i s
Page 10
AirFest Community Capture Impacts (Local spending)
Table 6: Summary of Total Community Capture Impacts
Total Community Capture Impact
Direct Community
Capture
Total Community
Capture
Output $30,364 $38,130
Labor Income $10,332 $13,239
Employment 0.5 0.5
Table 7: Summary of Community Capture Food and Beverage Impacts (Includes restaurants and drinking places)
Community Capture Food and Beverage Impact
Direct Community
Capture
Total Community
Capture
Output $21,705 $27,395
Labor Income $7,969 $10,115
Employment 0.4 0.4
Table 8: Summary of Community Capture Retail Impacts (Includes general retail, vendors, grocery stores, and other
retail)
Community Capture Retail/Shopping Impact
Direct Community
Capture
Total Community
Capture
Output $5,574 $6,851
Labor Income $1,858 $2,326
Employment 0.1 0.1
Table 9: Summary of Community Capture Transportation Impacts (Includes purchases made on gasoline and motor oil)
Community Capture Transportation Impact
Direct Community
Capture
Total Community
Capture
Output $702 $913
Labor Income $344 $421
Employment 0.0 0.0
G e o r g e t o w n A i r F e s t E c o n o m i c I m p a c t
A n a l y s i s
Page 11
Table 10: Summary of Community Capture Tourist Attraction Impacts (Includes natural and man-made visitor
attractions)
Tourist Attraction Economic Impact
Direct Economic Impact Total Economic Impact
Output $2,384 $2,972
Labor Income $160 $377
Employment 0.0 0.0
About Community Capture Spending
Community Capture represents the impacts of local spending related to AirFest. Even though
local spending does not create an economic impact, this spending might not have occurred
were it not for the event. Because of AirFest, locals bought gas, food, and went shopping.
Therefore, AirFest caused locals to spend money in the community – spending that might not
have occurred otherwise.
G e o r g e t o w n A i r F e s t E c o n o m i c I m p a c t
A n a l y s i s
Page 12
The following charts detail the economic impacts for total non-local spending, employment,
and labor income broken out by each spending category.
Figure 1: Impacts by Spending Category
Figure 2: Employment Impacts by Spending Category
19%
2%
56%
23%
$ Impacts by Spending Category
($103,192 Total Spending Impact)
Retail Impact
Transportation Impact
Food & Beverage Impact
Tourist Attraction Impact
22%
0%
64%
14%
Employment Impacts by Spending Category
(1.4 Total FTEs)
Retail Impact
Transportation Impact
Food & Beverage Impact
Tourist Attraction Impact
* There was no employment impact on the Transportation sector.
*
G e o r g e t o w n A i r F e s t E c o n o m i c I m p a c t
A n a l y s i s
Page 13
Figure 3: Labor Income Impacts by Spending Category
Figure 4: Average Per Person Per Day Spending by Spending Category
21%
3%
66%
10%
Labor Income Impacts by Spending Category
($32,056 Total Labor Income)
Retail Impact
Transportation Impact
Food & Beverage Impact
Tourist Attraction Impact
$- $1.00 $2.00 $3.00 $4.00 $5.00
Food Vendors
Restaurants
Shopping
Shopping Vendors
Lodging
Gasoline
Grocery
Tourist Attractions
Other
Average Per Person Per Day Spending
By Spending Category ($23.63 total)
G e o r g e t o w n A i r F e s t E c o n o m i c I m p a c t
A n a l y s i s
Page 14
Origin of AirFest Attendees
This map represents only those attendees who were surveyed. Event attendees came
primarily from five counties: Williamson (55%), Travis (34%), Bell (4%), Hays (3%), and Denton
(2%).
Figure 5: Map - Attendees by County
Attendee origins were also analyzed by zip code. The county and zip code segmentation
provides useful data that can be used in marketing this (and other) Georgetown events. It can
demonstrate whether marketing and outreach efforts were effective, and can also be used to
identify potentially lucrative markets that have previously gone untapped.
The map on the following page represents only those attendees who were surveyed. It depicts
the distribution of attendees by zip code. It shows a detailed look at the zip code origins from
the region surrounding the Georgetown area.
G e o r g e t o w n A i r F e s t E c o n o m i c I m p a c t
A n a l y s i s
Page 15
Figure 6: Map - Attendees by Zip Code
Local vs. Non-local Attendee Spending Comparison
Table 11: Local vs. Non-local Spending Comparison
Local vs. Non-local Spending Comparison
Non-Local Spending Local Spending
Category $ Amount (per
person per day)
Category $ Amount (per
person per day)
Food Vendors $4.99 Food Vendors $4.34
Restaurants $3.46 Restaurants $3.49
Shopping $3.23 Shopping $2.43
Shopping Vendors $3.40 Shopping Vendors $1.78
Gas $2.53 Gas $2.28
Grocery $1.27 Grocery $0.89
Tourist Attractions $3.62 Tourist Attractions $0.86
Other $1.12 Other $0.88
TOTAL* $23.63 TOTAL* $16.95
G e o r g e t o w n A i r F e s t E c o n o m i c I m p a c t
A n a l y s i s
Page 16
On a per person per day basis, out of town attendees out spent their local counterparts in every
category except for local restaurants. It is important to note that non-local event attendees are
a lucrative market, and measures should be taken to increase their attendance at Georgetown
festivals and events in the future. Also consider ways to cross promote restaurant and retail
outlets in downtown and at locations near event sites to encourage visitors and locals to spend
more money in Georgetown.
Local spending does not produce an economic impact. However, were it not for AirFest,
Georgetown residents (who attended the festival) might have spent no money in the
community that weekend.
Return on Investment
City of Georgetown staff requested that the return on their investment in AirFest be calculated.
Return on investment, or ROI, measures (in this case) the amount of spending generated by
local attendees in the city as a result of the money spent hosting the event.
ROI is calculated below using total AirFest budget (including labor by city staff) and the
marketing budget for local, non-local, and total expenditures.
Expenditures by the airport total $9,815.55. The Public Communications department spent
$3,910.00 to advertise the event. These two figures combine for a total of $13,725.55. The
estimated amount for City of Georgetown staff labor is $8,343.00 (149 hours @ $55.99/hour).
By including the hours worked, the grand total for AirFest expenses is $22,068.55.
The basic formula for ROI is:
(gain from investment - cost of investment)
cost of investment
NON-LOCAL ROI:
The marketing ROI for AirFest is:
$103,192 (total economic impact) - $3,910 (total marketing costs)
$3,910
The total ROI for AirFest is:
$103,192 (total economic impact) - $22,068.55 (total event costs)
$22,068.55
ROI =
= $25.39
= $3.68
G e o r g e t o w n A i r F e s t E c o n o m i c I m p a c t
A n a l y s i s
Page 17
LOCAL ROI:
The marketing ROI for AirFest is:
$38,130 (total community capture) - $3,910 (total marketing costs)
$3,910
The total ROI for AirFest is:
$38,130 (total community capture) - $22,068.55 (total event costs)
$22,068.55
TOTAL ROI:
The marketing ROI for AirFest is:
$141,322 (sum of community capture & economic impact) - $3,910 (total marketing costs)
$3,910
The total ROI for AirFest is:
$141,322 (sum of community capture & economic impact) - $22,068.55 (total event costs)
$22,068.55
In other words for every dollar the City of Georgetown spent developing and advertising
AirFest, it received $5.40 back in spending from Georgetown residents and visitors.
Sales Tax Impact
Festivals and events can create significant economic impacts in their host communities. Not
only do they benefit local businesses like retail shops, restaurants, and hotels, they also benefit
the local government through the generation of sales taxes.
The City of Georgetown has a sales tax rate of 8.25%, of which the City keeps 2%. It is possible
to calculate the sales tax impact on municipal coffers based on the economic impacts realized in
taxable spending categories.
The spending categories measured in this study include vendors (food and retail), restaurants
and bars, retail, gas stations/convenience stores, grocery stores, accommodations, tourist
attractions, and miscellaneous retail. There are both taxable and non -taxable items for sale at
gas stations/convenience stores and grocery stores. Since this study did not ask participants to
= $8.75
= $ .73
= $35.14
= $5.40
G e o r g e t o w n A i r F e s t E c o n o m i c I m p a c t
A n a l y s i s
Page 18
identify specific purchases, it is not possible to know if the impacts generated were based on
taxable or non-taxable items. Additionally, sales taxes are not assessed on accommodations.
For these reasons, the spending categories of gas station/convenience stores, grocery stores,
and accommodations were eliminated from the sales tax impact calculation. Because of these
issues, the final result is likely an underestimate of the sales tax generated.
Food and beverage/food services impact = $57,336 (non-local) + $27,395 (local) = $84,731
(includes food vendors, bars, and restaurants)
Retail/shopping impact = $17,417 (non-local) + $5,894 (local) = $23,311
(includes local retail shops and retail vendors ** grocery stores were eliminated)
Tourist attraction impact = $24,262 (non-local) + $2,972 (local) = $27,234
Total taxable impact = $135,276
* 8.25%
Total sales taxes $11,160.27
* 2% (retained by City of Georgetown)
Total sales tax impact $223.21
to City of Georgetown
Total City of Georgetown $22,068.55
Expenses
While not a large impact to the City of Georgetown, sales tax revenues are cumulative. With
each and every festival held, spending by visitors and residents generates sales taxes which can
be put to use on city projects.
Conclusion
This economic impact analysis covered the 2014 AirFest only. Any assumptions or conclusions
made were based on this year alone. Based on the 2014 data, AirFest definitely draws an out of
town market. This presents several opportunities to the event organizers.
Since non-local attendees outspend their local counterparts, increase s in marketing and
advertising to targeted areas could help to increase their attendance at future events. Because
of the data collected, the City of Georgetown now knows the most likely counties and zip codes
to target future advertising so that more non -local attendees can be attracted to the event. In
addition, the staff is now armed with suggestions from actual attendees on what chang es and
additions would entice them to stay longer. These same improvements could also draw in
more out of town attendees to the event. Cross promotion of local shopping and dining
opportunities will also help spread more spending throughout the city, and will thus add to the
economic impact of the event.
G e o r g e t o w n A i r F e s t E c o n o m i c I m p a c t
A n a l y s i s
Page 19
Open-Ended Responses – Attendees
The following answers were submitted to the open-ended questions on the survey form by
attendee survey participants.
How did you hear about AirFest?
Attendees were asked to specify how they learned about AirFest. Their responses are below.
Figure 7: How did you hear about AirFest? (Non-Local attendees)
11%
2%
0%
35%
31%
21%
Non-Local Attendees
Newspaper
Magazine
TV
Internet
Facebook
Other
G e o r g e t o w n A i r F e s t E c o n o m i c I m p a c t
A n a l y s i s
Page 20
Figure 8: How did you hear about AirFest? (Local attendees)
What did you like best about AirFest?
Respondents were asked to list the things they liked best about the 2014 AirFest. Their
responses are listed in the table below.
Table 12: What did you like best about AirFest?
Non-local Attendees Local Attendees
Helicopter & airplanes Airshow, carshow
My son getting to touch and see planes. Car show
Taking my baby on an airplane for the first
time
The people. Everyone was nice and
accommodating. My husband recently retired
from the Army and it was great that everyone
acknowledged veterans.
The planes. Helicopter ride & formation flight
Airplane rides Aircraft displays
Planes Kids being able to look inside planes
airshow and cars Seeing the police helicopter lift off and turn on
its siren.
Exhibits The great old planes
The economic plane rides! It's just a good time!
The plane displays, car display and plane rides. Vintage aircraft and cars
The family was able to take a flight for 20
dollars and it was a hit! Cant wait to do it
again
free event, educational for kids, beautiful
weather
21%
16%
5% 23%
12%
23%
Local Attendees
Newspaper
Magazine
TV
Internet
Facebook
Other
G e o r g e t o w n A i r F e s t E c o n o m i c I m p a c t
A n a l y s i s
Page 21
Being able to ride in a plane! It was so much
fun.
It was free ..and you didn't have to pay a arm
and a leg got nothing
The really cool cars and The bomber. the flyover
Hot air balloons. Cars. Airplanes The helicopters
very informative and low cost Seeing interesting airplanes.
Riding in the air craftsparking Flight demos and C57 rides
Diversity of airplanes and old cars car show
Airplanes!! Boop! The world war II plane displays
The different planes Helicopter ride
Free The planes
Being able to ride in a helicopter Seeing the unusual planes.
Airplanes and old cars So many people allowing my son to sit in their
aircraft.
military My son loved being able to get in some of the
plane and watching them take off
My kids rode in a plan for the very first time devil dog and very old fashion yellow aircraft
Everything well organized Aircraft
Helicopter ride, talking to p51 mustang
owners
The great music and atmosphere.
Cars The various planes, cars and the band
Grandkids got to sit in airplane and use
controls.
Historical plane displays and flights
Checking out the planes and cars The planes, classic cars, and kettle corn
Felt like a kid looking at the WWE airplanes The number of cars and planes to look at,
music, organized parking
Everything Having both cars and planes there provided
good variety
The cars and plane ride Cars and planes`
The action of the planes and helicopters flying
in and out.
The car show and the fact raft some owners
allow kids to sit inside the plane!
Being able to get up close to look at the planes
and cars!
hang gliding simulation
That it was a free event for families My son loved being able to get inside some of
the planes.
Helicopter ride Hot Air Balloons, formation flyover, vintage
aircraft and cars
the food The airshow.
Car and aircraft displays. Vendors. The chance for my child to see planes and
helicopters up close and hands on
flyover Cars, and very organized parking
The planes abd free plane rides Old Cars and old planes.
Helicopter ride be able get in airplanes
G e o r g e t o w n A i r F e s t E c o n o m i c I m p a c t
A n a l y s i s
Page 22
Planes The joy on people's faces! Seeing the planes,
the precision fly team, the music, car show,
vendors, and knowing that everyone could
afford to attend. The weather!
It was well run, getting cars in/out, flow of
people in the event.
The aircraft
Helicopter ride Classic cars
Tour very interesting Fly over
To see cars and airplane, and the music. looking inside the planes & cars
Seeing the helicopters and airplanes take off.
Planes flying in formation.
Helicopter ride
Looking inside the card and planes food, people
Display of cars & planes. Our grandson being able to get in some of the
aircraft
the weather Fly over
Tour of the helicopters and a chance to ride in
one.
Old airplanes and car show
Airplanes, Cars....very well organized,
especially parking
car show and watching the helicopter take off.
My 15 year old always wants to go to the
georgetown airport just to watch the planes
land and take off. He likes watching them put
gas in.
family friendly event, low cost
my 3 year old really enjoyed sitting in the
different planes
Airplane ride
Plane Displays --
The planes
Everything except no water at hand washing
station
seeing cars and planes
Hurt helicopter ride
rides
The flying airplanes show
Getting to look at airplanes.
The planes and helicopters that my kids were
allowed to sit in, etc.
Looking at the larger planes and watching the
various takeoffs and landings.
Loved being able to get in the planes
The planes, easy to get to and park
Army planes
Family atmosphere, boarding planes and
helicopters
G e o r g e t o w n A i r F e s t E c o n o m i c I m p a c t
A n a l y s i s
Page 23
The fact that my five year old son got a Huey
ride! Way to go!
What changes or additions would you like to see at AirFest next year?
Survey respondents were asked what changes or additions could be made to AirFest that would
bring them back next year. They are listed below.
Table 13: What changes or additions would you like to see at AirFest next year?
Non-local Attendees Local Attendees
More hands-on exhibits. Also, the air show
itself felt short (though, understandably)
An actual airshow with seating would be
great. More vendors, specifically food
vendors. We would have spent money, but
the lines were long and very slow moving.
Cheaper rides in the ford plane None was better than the red poppy car show.
More vendors with food that's fresh cooked. Better food vendors.
Cheaper airplane rides in the ford plane None
More actual air show Less cars
more airshow Get rid of the DJ! Band was okay, but the DJ
was just noise pollution!!!
More food options More food vendors and maybe wine from
local winery.
Maybe a vintage plane competition or display
, a home built plane display and
demonstration. War birds.
Na
n/a A little more room to walk
More vendors. more seating to rest upon
I think they should add sky dive for $50 a
person.
Maybe kid rides or more interactive fun
No pets. Air show?
longer airshow More planes and flight demos
Parking More flight demos and some historical
presentations about the war planes
I would love to see Pilots & Paws represented! some sort of seating
N\A Sell alcoholic beverages
More planes Add activities for kids and young people.
We wanna see planes flying in the air. More food (shorter lines), and restrooms.
attraction for kids, and for pets Definatly missed having the a patchy
helicopter there this year
More vendors for souvenir loves go there with my kids
Shuttles for those who have to park in the
faraway spots. More tables and chairs to rest
at; More porta-potties.
More aircraft
G e o r g e t o w n A i r F e s t E c o n o m i c I m p a c t
A n a l y s i s
Page 24
Better parking plan,we waited in line for 30
minutes to park, and then again when we
departed. Rope off the walkway area
between the parking area and the air show
entrance (along the runway and businesses
located within the airport).
Can't think of anything, had a wonderful time..
The time it took to get in and out of the
parking area
More planes, less cars, more planes in the air
Some vendors were rude None
more air stuff flying around More activities for children: arts and crafts,
pilots talking to them about planes, interactive
games
More vendors. More air show. maybe a space to watch planes take off and
land?
more flyovers more planes and airshows military
The m.c. was super grating on my ears. A new
mc or have him not talk as much. Had to
leave
Add jets!!!
Nothing more opportunities to get inside an airplane,
small or large
More of everything More vintage aircraft, tours, information
sessions
Could have used more food vendors. I don't recall seeing any souvenirs being sold.
So I'd recommend either a) selling souvenirs;
or, if you were selling souvenirs, b) making
the souvenir "shop" visible. I also thought
some kind of map would've been helpful.
The parking could be improved upon-long
distance walking for us "oldies"
More food vendors the lines were too long
due to little variation, of choices.
Yes Acrobatics and stunt flying demonstrations
and air force team flying. We got almost
nothing this year.
More hands-on activities for kids more experience with aircraft
More food vendors, a couple kids activities
(virtual flight or plane making)
Make several donation areas. BIG
SIGN...CLOWNS to Alert People to the Giving!!
Even though the truck and stand were next to
the main gate...we guessed that was the drop
off. Promote and Celebrate the Giving Part!
Have booths on both sides of the Main Entry.
A big bucket to toss the money. Think BIG!
Kids like to Feed Stuff! "Paint Devil Dog On a
Container with his mouth open... Please Feed
Me!
Air show/stunts More planes
G e o r g e t o w n A i r F e s t E c o n o m i c I m p a c t
A n a l y s i s
Page 25
more of an "air" show. I was really
disappointed that there was no trick flying or
really much of a show
Have some other entertainment for the kids
like bounce house or something.
I would like to see more for the kids. A corner
dedicated to the small children..face painting
and balloon making just a few examples
more flyovers by old planes
Need to work on ingress and egress....only one
road in and out....
Better signs for activities
a new strategy regarding traffic and parking More aircraft
more information on the website, ie no
mention of food vendors that would be there.
since we were unsure, we packed a picnic. the
lines for the vendors were also very long so it
was a good thing we brought our own food.
more food vendors would be a good idea.
More planes you can go on
No More food vendors. Air acrobatics,
demonstrations, parachute shows, etc..
Would be great to have an actual AirShow
also...
Just some things that children can do hands
on. Some type of activities concerning
airplanes and the airport.
More arial planes
More seating
air show
more food stalls and kids entertainment
More airplanes flying and doing shows
Publish cost of plane rides on website.
Better Parking organization!! It took forever to
get out!! And also, more (competent) food
vendors! The lines were entirely too long at
the trailers! I spent a fraction of what I would
have if the lines weren't so long.
More opportunities to interact with planes or
learn about them rather than just admiring.
Food vendor lines were too long
More planes and opportunities to fly in planes
n/a
Jets if possible
I think it was well run, no complaints.
What other comments or thoughts do you have about AirFest?
This question was intended to elicit comments and suggestions from survey respondents that
may not have been covered with the other survey questions. Often, this question can yield very
helpful and interesting results.
G e o r g e t o w n A i r F e s t E c o n o m i c I m p a c t
A n a l y s i s
Page 26
Table 14: What other thoughts or comments do you have about AirFest?
Non-local Attendees Local Attendees
Enjoyed the car show as well Love that it's a family friendly/free event. It's
grown the past few years, can't wait to see
what next year brings.
Consider adding more seating near vendors. Was. Great
I loved everything there Well. Organized event. Great family outing
Glad to see your doing them. A lot of people walked in without food
donations, encourage that more. Keep it free
and with free parking.
LOved it ! It is a great festival, but the food lines were
too long and too slow so we spent no $ on
food even though we really wanted to -we
stood in a line for a hot dog for 20 minutes
and it did not move so we gave up.
Overall it was a great time. I attended with
two of my friends, one with her two girls and
hasband then was later joined up with the
others parents. Everyone had a blast and my 2
year old niece had so much fun dancing
around to the live music. We also enjoyed the
car show!
It's a good event, no complaints
I hope I win! A fun family event
Great activity. I brought a couple cans of food
but couldn't find where to drop off.
We hung around for 3 hours. Enjoyed the car
show but really wanted to see the air show. It
kept being delayed 3 times and my son uses a
walker and we had to just leave without
seeing the show. 3 hours and no place to rest
made it impossible to stay any longer.
AirFest is so much fun. The vendors, cars and
volunteers are all great!
Couldn't buy any food from vendors at show
because lines were too long.
I love this! I have a four year old and it's big
enough to hold his attention but not
overwhelming. As a single mom, I'm always
looking for free educational and fun activities.
This is perfect!
My boy had a great time and was featured on
the front page of the wilco sun.
Parking was problematic. Spent 30 minutes
trying to leave.
Need more restrooms and the the place to
wash your has was out if water and towel
which was really messy once ur kid has soap
all over there hand and can get it off
same as above. This is the first time I have attended. I loved it
and the grand kids had such a great time...
G e o r g e t o w n A i r F e s t E c o n o m i c I m p a c t
A n a l y s i s
Page 27
Well organized good job!!! Good crowd, more air show
Great. Kids loved it It was a lot of fun for the whole family. I
enjoyed the organized parking. I feel that it
would be helpful to have someone (police,
staff) at the intersection of Airport Rd and
Lakeway to help with traffic.
Thanks for putting it on for the community! It
makes for a great afternoon of family time!
Had a fun leisure time but has become more
for older generation of Georgetown, been
noticing the large amount of elders in our
community making this community more like
a nrsing home
I will be back next year for the helicopter ride We love it, perfect time of year and so fun for
the kids .. Adults too. Live band was awesome
too my little girl danced away!
Great time Had a great time. More kid activities please.
We had a blast and can't wait for next year! There was not a detailed schedule of events
that I could find. I would have liked to see the
model airplanes fly. Would have liked
information sessions about the aircraft...talks
given.
liked the car show, it seemed to steal the
show
I had a lot of fun with my family, but the
experience felt kind of chaotic.
First time to attend an airshow and I'm pretty
impressed with how organised the traffic and
parking was.
I know most likely there is a reason for the
limited aviation action, but if possible it would
be nice to have some events to view, but I am
from Chicago so maybe my expectations are
distorted.
Thanks to those plane owners who allowed
small children to sit in their planes. That was
incredibly generous and giving of them, as the
children loved the experience.
Very disappointed in aerial demonstrations.
Except for old cars and old planes it was not
worth my time.
Better parking and routes in and out. More
flyovers. It was awesome otherwise
Keep up good work
Enjoyed it. Found back enterance on mapqust
-- would take the back entrance and save time
getting into the show. Maybe more police
directing traffic
It's Amazing! Thank you to everyone who
made the AirFest possible. God Bless You!
Great- very family oriented I definitely think you need something more for
the kids to do than just walk around and look
at planes and cars.
Very interesting and good for kids to lesrn It was fun and bigger than I thought it would
be.
G e o r g e t o w n A i r F e s t E c o n o m i c I m p a c t
A n a l y s i s
Page 28
More flying in the skies Having the first commercial passenger plane
was great, as was the availability of rides in
the helicopter. Nice atmosphere.
We had a great time! Me and my kids had a terrific time.
Good family environment
Overall I thought the festivities were great!
Work on parking on the south end
we had a really enjoyable family day. thank
you!
This was a great event. An Airshow would be
awesome.
Allow people to get better view or landing
strip
Fix the parking and food issue Nd you guys will
get more ppl back next year!
n/a
I actually think you should charge an
admission to get in or at least parking. Seems
odd that such entertainment is free.
Table 15: How many times have you visited the Georgetown Municipal Airport?
How many times have you visited the Georgetown Municipal Airport?
Non-local Attendees Local Attendees
Never 44 20
1 time 21 20
2-4 times 6 8
5-7 times 1 1
8-10 times 0 1
Greater than 10 times 1 3
Attendees were also asked to explain what businesses, attractions, or events would bring them
back to the Georgetown Municipal Airport. Their thoughts are provided below.
Table 16: What would bring you back to the Georgetown Municipal Airport?
Non-local Attendees Local Attendees
Air show Airshow and an other family friendly events
The plane rides Car show
Shows, but I need to know about them
beforehand.
More food vendors
Airplane rides Advertising cost of plane ride
Air show Bbq vendor was good
airfest AirFest
Air show, Air shows fireworks workshops for kids
G e o r g e t o w n A i r F e s t E c o n o m i c I m p a c t
A n a l y s i s
Page 29
Air shows Family, friends
Cheap flights that my kids love Airfest
Anything fun and family oriented that I could
bring my nieces to.
Things kids would enjoy
the cool planes Airshows, demonstrations, ride-alongs
air fest same thing,
Air fest The formation flight
I love the flights being offered, both by
organizations maintaining vintage aircraft and
flights on small aircraft and by Young Eagles.
Air/car shows
More airshows Plane and the air show
Other Air Shows Like their design of aircraft parking and
storage
Air show Next airfest
classic cars Air show
Airfest Air Fest
Air fest Air shows,
Flight lessons Charter plane ride
Private planes Classic Car Show, Plane Show, More Food
Options, Activities for Children
Model airplanes hot air balloon.
Helicopters. Planes flying over. Pole cars.
More airfest type things. In Round Rock, they
recently had "touch a truck" which was where
the kids could go see all kinds of trucks and
vehicles and climb inside. If we could do
something like that with airplanes, trucks,
helicopters, etc., that would be fun. If kids
could get a tour of the airport, that would also
be really fun!
Air shows, museum or children's educational
opportunities
ROT Ralley
Air planes, cars, helicopter ride Devil dog! My son would love to see some jets
if possible! He wants to be a pilot!
Airfest car show and plane show
Airfest bring back the plane rides
All of the ones that were there. I would enjoy
current military and (more) law enforcement
planes, autos, and equipment on display.
There was something about a kids flying club.
I think it would also be great if there were
some educational opportunities explaining the
different functions of the airport and maybe
an aircraft walkaround/tour to explain the
various parts and how they work to make the
craft fly.
G e o r g e t o w n A i r F e s t E c o n o m i c I m p a c t
A n a l y s i s
Page 30
a real air show The air show itself actually had more aviation
events for spectators. It seems it should be
the Custom and Antique Auto Show not air
show. The automobile was very cool, but in
regard to an air show; nothing happening.
Air Festival A really good air show.
Any fun fest air plane show
Car show n air show. Loved the helicopter ride Devil Dog - Airfest
Airshow carshow Airfest
Airfest/Planes Kettle corn!
Events visit music, air show, old planes & cars
Helicopter and airplane rides Food
Plane rides, air show (possibly longer), Automobiles, Aircraft
Air Show More fly overs The blue angels
an air show that lasted longer than a few
minutes
Restaurants, festivals
All of them. Activities for children of all ages. Hands on
fun.
Airplanes, Cars
airshows, carshows
another festival
B25 bomer
AirShow
More airshoes
Air fest
airshow and car show, airplane ride, food
Another airfest
Plane rides.
Activities for kids.
Planes, air show, car show. Our 3 Year old boy
loved if
Another airfest, holiday events, other special
events
n/a
The airshow
I've been to AirFest before and look forward
to coming back. A school field trip for my kids
would also bring me back.
G e o r g e t o w n A i r F e s t E c o n o m i c I m p a c t
A n a l y s i s
Page 31
IMPLAN and Economic Impact Modeling
This analysis was conducted using the IMPLAN model developed by Minnesota Implan Group
(MIG). The model uses economic theory combined with historical trends to anticipate changes
in direct, indirect and induced employment and income generated due to the presence of a
new business, industry, or event. The results of this analysis are intended for the use by its
recipients. Publishing for general viewing is at their discretion.
IMPLAN is an input/output model that is based on economic factors attributed to a specific
county or region.
This analysis reflects the anticipated county impacts. The output and analysis from IMPLAN
simulations are theoretical in nature and are contingent on the quality and quantity of data
provided as input.
About Sarah T. Page Consulting, LLC
Sarah T. Page Consulting, LLC is backed by 23+ years of experience of Principal, Sarah Page. Our
strengths lie in several diverse areas including:
Economic impact analysis
Social media marketing
Custom training and presentations on tourism and social media
Social media campaign development and execution
Our clientele includes public sector entities, non-profits, and associations.
G e o r g e t o w n A i r F e s t E c o n o m i c I m p a c t
A n a l y s i s
Page 32
Appendix 1 – Attendee Survey
AirFest
Economic Impact Analysis
Suggested welcome screen text:
Thank you for agreeing to participate in this economic impact study. Your responses will be
used to determine the economic impact of AirFest on the City of Georgetown. We know you’re
busy, so we’re only asking a few minutes of your time. Please complete the questionnaire on
the following page to the best of your recollection. Your answers are very important to the
success of this study. By completing this questionnaire and confirming your Email address, you
will be entered into a drawing for a $100 Visa gift card. Thank you in advance for your time and
assistance.
1. Are you an …: Attendee? Vendor?
2. What is the zip code at your home address? ____________
3. How many people were in your group? ______
4. How many days were you in Georgetown? _______
5. Could you help out AirFest by telling us approximately how much your group spent in the
following categories?
Type of Expenditure Amount spent in Georgetown
A. Food vendors at AirFest $ ______________________
B. Restaurants $ ______________________
C. Shopping $ ______________________
Retail vendors at AirFest $ ______________________
D. Lodging $ ______________________
E. Gasoline $ ______________________
F. Grocery Stores $ ______________________
G. Tourist attractions or entertainment $ ______________________
H. Any other expenses $ ______________________
Please identify ________________________________________
6. If you stayed in paid accommodations, where did you stay?
___________________________________________________________________________
7. How did you hear about AirFest?
Newspaper? Which paper? _____________________
G e o r g e t o w n A i r F e s t E c o n o m i c I m p a c t
A n a l y s i s
Page 33
Magazine? Which magazine? _____________________
Internet? Facebook?
TV ? Which station? ______________________
Other ______________________
8. In the last year, how many times have you visited the Georgetown Municipal Airport?
Greater than 10 7-10 times
5-7 times 3-5 times
1-3 times Never
9. What attractions, businesses, or events would bring you back to the Georgetown Municipal Airport?
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
10. What do you like best about AirFest?
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
11. What changes or additions would you like to see at AirFest next year?
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
12. Please share with us any comments or thoughts you have about AirFest .
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
Suggested Thank You screen text:
Thank you for taking the time to complete this survey. Be assured that any information
gathered is for our research only and will not be shared with any outside source. Your help is
greatly appreciated. If you are selected as the winner of our drawing for the $100 Visa gift card,
you will be notified via the email address you provided within the next three weeks.
G e o r g e t o w n A i r F e s t E c o n o m i c I m p a c t
A n a l y s i s
Page 34
Figure 9: SurveyMonkey Attendee Email Survey Branding
The following three photos are the previews of the original invitation and two reminder Emails
that were sent to the participants.
Figure 10: SurveyMonkey Attendee Email #1 Preview
G e o r g e t o w n A i r F e s t E c o n o m i c I m p a c t
A n a l y s i s
Page 35
Figure 11: SurveyMonkey Attendee Email #2 Preview
Figure 12: SurveyMonkey Attendee Email #3 Preview
Prepared by: LKemp
3/4/2015
Georgetown Municipal Airport
As of January 31, 2015
Statement of Operations A - B = C B - D = E
A B C D E
2014/2015 1/31/2014
Budget $ YTD Actuals $%
Beginning Fund Balance 21,612 (A)79,378 (57,766) 517,632 (438,254) -85%
Operating Revenues:
Fuel Sales 2,469,900 759,749 1,710,151 805,934 (46,185) -6%
Fuel Expense (2,272,600) (660,539) (1,612,061) (721,783) 61,244 -8%
Net Fuel Revenues 197,300 99,209 98,091 84,151 15,058 18%
(B)Leases & Rentals 641,200 187,907 453,293 192,418 (4,511) -2%
(C)Bankruptcy - Georgetown Jet Center - - - 90,452 (90,452) -100%
Interest 4,000 14 3,986 172 (158) -92%
(D)Other Revenues 39,150 1,313 37,837 1,714 (401) -23%
Total Operating Revenues 881,650 288,444 593,206 368,909 (80,464) -22%
Operating Expenses:
Personnel (350,253) (104,219) (246,034) (108,013) 3,794 -4%
Operations (608,072) (380,710) (227,362) (279,686) (101,023) 36%
Furniture & Equipment - - (561) 561 #DIV/0!
Total Operating Expenses (958,325) (484,929) (473,396) (388,260) (96,668) 25%
Total - Net Operating Revenues (Expenses)(76,675) (196,484) 119,809 (19,352) (177,133) 915%
Non-Operating Revenues (Expenses):
Bond Proceeds 870,000 - 870,000 - - 0%
Debt - Principal & Interest (178,612) 2 (178,614) - 2 0%
Capital Improvement Program
Settlement Revenue - AJS Drainage - - - 110,000 (110,000) -100%
Transfer from General Fund - Capital Projects - - - 32,750 (32,750) -100%
AJS Draining Improvements - (59) - (87,500) 87,441 -100%
Runway 1836 Lights (770,000) - (770,000) - - 0%
Fuel Farm (100,000) - (100,000) - - 0%
Net Capital Improvement Program (870,000) (59) (870,000) 55,250 (55,309) -100%
Total - Net Non-Operating Revenues (Expenses)(178,612) (57) (178,614) 55,250 (55,307) -100%
Net Revenues/(Expenses)(255,287) (196,541) (58,805) 35,898 (232,439) 118%
Ending Fund Balance (E)(233,675) (117,163) 553,530
NOTES:
(A)Preliminary actual beginning fund balance.
(B)Leases and Rentals include T-Hangars, ground leases, and tie downs.
(C)The City does not expect to receive any more bankruptcy revenue as the lease is now owned by the bank.
(D)Other Revenues include Ad Valorem Tax, special events and discounts. Most are received at fiscal year end.
(E)The Electric Fund is covering the contingency requirements for Airport to meet City-wide contingency reserves per policy.
Reserve decreased to 45 days effective October 1, 2014.
1/31/2015
YTD Actuals
Variance
Year to Date
Variance
Budget
Balance Sheet Highlights Current
Preliminary
Actuals
1/31/2015 12/31/2014 11/30/2014 9/30/2014
Assets:
Cash & Investments 3,448 10,794 41,391 47,180
Accounts Receivable - Leases & Fuel 52,034 62,316 58,858 111,633
Liabilities:
Bond Debt Outstanding 603,847 603,847 603,847 603,847
City of Georgetown, Texas
Transportation Advisory Board
March 13, 2015
SUBJECT:
Nominations and election of Vice-Chair of the GTAB Board. - Truman Hunt – Chair Person for
GTAB
ITEM SUMMARY:
Per the Bylaws of the Georgetown Transportation Advisory Board;
“Section 3.1 – Officers. The Board Officers are Chairman, Vice-Chairman and Secretary. The
Chair is appointed by the City Council during the annual appointment process. The other Board
Officers are elected by a majority vote of the Members at its first meeting after the annual
appointment process.”
The Chair of the Board, Mr. Truman Hunt, will take the nominations from the floor, for position of
Vice-Chair.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
n/a
SUBMITTED BY:
Jana Kern
City of Georgetown, Texas
Transportation Advisory Board
March 13, 2015
SUBJECT:
Nominations and election of Secretary of the GTAB Board. – Truman Hunt, GTAB Chair Person
ITEM SUMMARY:
Per the Bylaws of the Georgetown Transportation Advisory Board;
“Section 3.1 – Officers. The Board Officers are Chairman, Vice-Chairman and Secretary. The
Chair is appointed by the City Council during the annual appointment process. The other Board
Officers are elected by a majority vote of the Members at its first meeting after the annual
appointment process.”
The Chair of the Board, Mr. Truman Hunt, will take the nominations from the floor, for position of
Secretary.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
n/a
SUBMITTED BY:
Jana Kern
City of Georgetown, Texas
Transportation Advisory Board
March 13, 2015
SUBJECT:
Review and possible action related to the Day and Time of GTAB Board Meetings. – Truman
Hunt, GTAB Chair Person
ITEM SUMMARY:
Per the GTAB Bylaws Section 4.1 Time & Date of Regular Meeting. The Board shall meet once
a month on the same week of the month, the same day of the week, at the same time, and at the
same place. The regular date, time, and place of the Board meeting will be decided by the
Members at the first meeting, of the Board after the annual appointment process.
Currently, the GTAB Board meets on the second Friday of each month at 10:00 a.m.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
n/a
SUBMITTED BY:
Jana Kern
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
GTAB Dates Backup Material
GEORGETOWN TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY BOARD
(GTAB)
Meeting Schedule
March 2015 – February 2016
All Regular Meetings will be held on the second FRIDAY of every month at 10:00 a.m.
at the Georgetown Municipal Complex, located at 300-1 Industrial Avenue
Please contact Jana Kern @ 930-8473 if you have questions regarding meeting dates or
times.
MARCH 13, 2015
APRIL 10, 2015
MAY 08, 2015
JUNE 12, 2015
JULY 10, 2015
AUGUST 14, 2015
SEPTEMBER 11, 2015
OCTOBER 09, 2015
NOVEMBER 13, 2015
DECEMBER 10, 2015 (Thursday)
JANUARY 08, 2016
FEBRUARY 12, 2016
City of Georgetown, Texas
Transportation Advisory Board
March 13, 2015
SUBJECT:
Review and possible action to approve the minutes from the Regular GTAB Board meeting held
on February 13, 2015. - Jana Kern – GTAB Board Liaison
ITEM SUMMARY:
Board to review and revise and/or approve the minutes from the regular meeting held on
February 13, 2015.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
n/a
SUBMITTED BY:
Jana Kern
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Draft Minutes Backup Material
City of Georgetown, Texas
Transportation Advisory Board
March 13, 2015
SUBJECT:
Consideration and possible recommendation to approve an Agreement to Terminate Lease with
the Apollo Composite Squadron, Texas Wing, Civil Air Patrol—Russ Volk C.M., Airport
Manager and Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Transportation Services Director
ITEM SUMMARY:
The City of Georgetown has plans to construct a parking lot just east of the Control Tower at the
same location as a Civil Air Patrol (CAP) facility. This parking lot construction is part of the
FY2015 TxDOT Airport Improvement Project. Originally, the CAP facility was to be renovated
for use as a base of operation at the Georgetown Municipal Airport. CAP is unable to complete the
renovations plus the facility needs to be moved or tore down to make room for a planned parking
lot. With execution of Agreement To Termination Lease, the City can then make arrangements to
move or teardown the facility to make room for the parking lot.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends consideration of the Agreement To Termination Lease with Civil Air Patrol
which will result in the City securing possession of the existing facility.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
NA
SUBMITTED BY:
Russ Volk
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Termination Agreement Exhibit
Page 1 of 2
AGREEMENT TO TERMINATE LEASE
WHEREAS, The City of Georgetown and Texas Society of Aeronautics, Inc. (hereinafter “TSA)
entered into a twenty-year Lease Agreement (hereinafter “Lease Agreement”) effective July 1,
1981;
WHEREAS, TSA assigned its rights, title, and interest in said Lease Agreement to Apollo
Composite Squadron, Texas Wing, Civil Air Patrol dated February 13, 1987;
WHEREAS, The City of Georgetown and Apollo Composite Squadron, Texas Wing, Civil Air
Patrol (hereinafter “Civil Air Patrol” entered into a twenty-year extension of the Lease
Agreement terminating the lease on July 1, 2021 effective July 1, 1998;
WHEREAS, The City of Georgetown and Apollo Composite Squadron, Texas Wing, Civil Air
Patrol amended the lease to delete one thousand fifty six and .39 square feet, more or less
(approximately 8’ x 188’) effective April 1, 1999;
WHEREAS, Apollo Composite Squadron, Texas Wing, Civil Air Patrol has been unable to
maintain the premises and buildings on the leased land;
WHEREAS, the City of Georgetown desires to remove the building from the airport to facilitate
improvements at the airport; and
NOW THEREFORE the City of Georgetown Civil Air Patrol herein agree to the following:
Section 1 The facts and opinions in the opinion are true and correct.
Section 2 The parties agree that the lease will be terminated as of the 31st day of March
2015.
SIGNED AND AGREED TO on the _____ day of ____________________, 2015
City of Georgetown
By________________________________
Dale Ross, Mayor
Approved as to Form:
____________________
Bridget Chapman
City Attorney
Page 2 of 2
SIGNED AND AGREED TO on the _____ day of ____________________, 2015
Apollo Composite Squadron, Texas Wing,
Civil Air Patrol
By_______________________________
City of Georgetown, Texas
Transportation Advisory Board
March 13, 2015
SUBJECT:
Consideration and possible recommendation to GTEC for approval of the 2015/2016 Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP)– Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Transportation Services Director, and Nat
Waggoner, PMP®, Transportation Analyst.
ITEM SUMMARY:
The Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation (GTEC) by statute must adopt a 5-year
Capital Improvement Program. The City of Georgetown GTEC By-laws and Overall Transportation
Plan refer to this as a Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). The process to complete the TIP
requires coordination and submittal of projects from the GTAB Board to GTEC. The GTEC/GTAB
TIP reflects the transportation projects that the GTEC (4B) Board have found eligible for funding, and
the status of those projects.
Staff is aware that revenue and bonding capacity for GTEC will be limited because of the expenditure
of GTEC funds for projects in the FY 14/15 TIP. The proposed GTEC TIP is a continuation of
development of those projects which staff feel will have the greatest economic and transportation
impact for the community. Changes to the GTEC/GTAB TIP are shown in bold in the 2015/16 Draft
GTEC/GTAB Transportation Improvement Program Project List. Several projects are related to the
proposed.
Staff has also included the Summit at Rivery Park TIA Improvements in the Draft GTEC TIP. GTEC
approved the TIA in October 2013 and directed staff to begin programming those improvements as
recommended. Funding for Year 1 of those improvements was delayed from last year’s TIP awaiting
completion of the Economic Development agreements related to the Convention Center and Hotel.
The proposed 2015 Bond Program List will be discussed in future GTAB meetings as staff works out a
programming and letting schedule.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff is recommending approval and submittal of the 5-year GTEC TIP to the GTEC Board and
proposed 2008 Bond programming in the draft 2015/16 Budget documents.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
n/a
SUBMITTED BY:
Edward G. Polasek, AICP
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
2014/15 Draft TIP Documents Backup Material
2015 Bond List Backup Material
3/04/2015
Project Spent/ Current 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 Summary Funds
Project Detail Description of Transportation Total Encumbered GTEC GTEC GTEC GTEC GTEC GTEC 5 Year Still
# Improvement Estimate Funding Funding Funding Funding Funding Funding Funding Total Needed*
Projects Submitted to GTEC for their TIP Process
AD IH-35/Williams Gateway Access Improvements (Rivery
Extension)$8,907,000 $65,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000 $5,907,000
BC Wolf Ranch Parkway (SH 29 (D.B. Wood) to SH 29
Bypass) (tied to bypass)$4,500,000 $1,330,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,170,000
AZ SH 29 Bypass (from RR 2243 to SH29) $18,920,000 $5,390,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,530,000
BK SH 29 Bypass (from IH 35 to RR 2243) $20,300,000 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $18,800,000
BL South East Inner Loop (Widening to 4 Lanes (IH 35 to
Rock Ride Lane))$19,950,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,500,000 $17,450,000
BO
FM 1460 Widening (Quail Valley south to '1,000 North of
CR114 in Round Rock)$44,565,400 $1,500,000 $450,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $42,615,400
XX Airport Road (IH35 to Lakeway)*** $6,700,000 $0 $1,700,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000,000
VV Airport Road (Lakeway to North of Halmar Cove)*** $7,500,000 $0 $3,030,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,470,000
QQ Airport Road (Berry Creek Drive south to Three Forks) $11,870,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,500,000 $0 $0 $2,500,000 $9,370,000
AE FM971/Northwest Blvd Bridge (Washam over IH35 to
Apple Creek)$12,825,000 $425,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,400,000
AG FM 971 (Terminus of NW/971 Bridge (QQ) to Gann St) $4,150,000 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,000,000
AF
Construct Northbound Frontage Road (FM 2338 to
Lakeway)$12,500,000 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,250,000 $2,500,000 $3,750,000 $9,900,000
CK Mays - Teravista Pkwy To Westinghouse Rd (WH TIRZ)$10,650,000 $300,000 $10,350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
BZ Mays - Westinghouse Rd to Blue Springs (WH TIRZ) $12,760,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,760,000
CE Blue Ridge Drive (WH TIRZ) $10,910,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,910,000
CJ Westinghouse Rd - Mays Street to FM 1460 (WH TIRZ)$18,530,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $18,530,000
UU Aviation Drive (Airport Road to IH 35) $4,200,000 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,900,000
WW Three Forks to Aviation Drive $2,625,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,625,000
AT SH 29 (IH 35 to Haven Lane) HEB TIA $5,000,000 $650,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,350,000
Riv TIA Rivery TIA Improvements $3,250,000 $750,000 $0 $1,400,000 $0 $0 $1,100,000 $0 $2,500,000 $0
Total $240,612,400 $12,460,000 $17,030,000 $2,900,000 $2,500,000 $2,500,000 $2,350,000 $2,500,000 $12,750,000 $199,687,400
Note: Tentative Schedule still subject to GTEC, GTAB and City Council approval, and bond letting for each fiscal year. These are estimates only and may change up until bond letting/funding each fiscal year.
* Funds Still Needed: in some cases this may include Federal/State Funding/Contributions
** Funds requested are for two lane construction only in ultimate ROW
*** Pecan Center Economic Development Project Includes partial funding
2015/16 DRAFT GTEC/GTAB TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP) PROJECT LIST
Project Complete Ongoing
Long
Term Notes Total Project
Costs
Amount
Issued3 "Balance"
Funds
Required to
Complete
SE 1/Maple √√√√Completed $ 6,000,000 $ 5,180,000 $ 820,000 $ -
DB Wood/Williams √√√√Completed $ 1,650,000 $ 1,370,000 $ 280,000 $ -
FM 1460 √√√√Under Construction
Spring 2015 $ 16,900,000 $ 7,300,000 $ 9,600,000 $ 4,400,000
SH 29 Bypass Routing
Study √√√√Ongoing $ 2,500,000 $ 1,250,000 $ 1,250,000 $ -
FM 971 √√√√
Partial - Intersection
improvements in 2012
and 2014-2016.
$ 13,200,000 $ 500,000 $ 12,700,000 $ 4,000,000
Berry Creek Drive √√√√ $ 3,900,000 $ - $ 3,900,000 $ 3,900,000
Total2: 44,150,000$ 15,600,000$ 28,550,000$ 12,300,000$
Anticipated Issuance Costs: 1,850,000$
Project Complete 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 Beyond
SE 1/Maple √√√√
DB Wood/Williams √√√√
Notes:
1 Total includes issuance costs.
2 Total does not include issuance costs.
3 Funds remaing after project has been completed have been rolled into the FM 1460 project.
2008 Road Bond Programming
FY 15/16 and beyond
Remaining: 33,955,000$
2008 Road Bond Summary
January 27, 2015
2008 Road Bonds Authorized1: 46,000,000$
Total Issued: 12,045,000$
New
Order OTP Roadway
Project Construction Project Costs Issuance
Net Cost
to Complete Cumulative
*C 2 AE Northwest Blvd Bridge - Fontana Dr To Austin Ave 7,093,938$ 11,020,000$ 275,500$ 12,397,500$ 12,397,500$
*C 3 AD Rivery Blvd Extension - Williams Dr To Northwest Blvd 5,500,000$ 5,907,000$ 147,675$ 6,645,375$ 19,042,875$
*C 4 AF IH 35 NB Frontage Road - Williams Dr To Lakeway Bridge 5,410,678$ 6,243,000$ 156,075$ 7,023,375$ 26,066,250$
*C 5 AZ1 Southwest Bypass - Wolf Ranch Pkwy To Leander Rd 16,665,000$ 13,530,000$ 338,250$ 15,221,250$ 41,287,500$
*C 6 BC Wolf Ranch Pkwy - DB Wood Dr To Southwest Bypass 2,650,000$ 3,168,000$ 79,200$ 3,564,000$ 44,851,500$
*C 7 -Intersection/Capital Pool 20,000,000$ 5,000,000$ 125,000$ 5,125,000$ 49,976,500$
*D 8 CS Leander Rd Bridge @ IH 35 8,000,000$ 4,500,000$ 112,500$ 4,612,500$ 54,589,000$
*C 9 -Sidewalk, Safety and ADA Accessibility Pool 10,000,000$ 10,000,000$ 250,000$ 10,250,000$ 64,839,000$
*D 14 AJ NE Inner Loop - Stadium Dr To FM 971 3,660,000$ 1,000,000$ 25,000$ 1,025,000$ 65,864,000$
*D 16 CQ Stadium Dr (CR 151) - Austin Ave To NE Inner Loop 2,860,000$ 1,000,000$ 25,000$ 1,025,000$ 66,889,000$
*C 18 BP Southwestern Blvd - Raintree Dr To SE Inner Loop 2,480,000$ 3,723,000$ 93,075$ $ 4,188,375 $ 71,077,375
*D 21 AT SH 29 (Haven Lane to SH130)12,600,000$ 4,000,000$ 100,000$ 4,100,000$ 75,177,375$
*C 10 BJ2 Leander Rd (RM 2243) - 400ft W of SWBypass to River Ridge Dr 3,100,000$ 4,650,000$ 116,250$ 5,231,250$ 80,408,625$
*C 11 AN DB Wood Dr - SH 29 To Oak Ridge Dr 12,500,000$ 16,320,000$ 408,000$ 18,360,000$ 98,768,625$
*D 19 AZ2 Southwest Bypass- Wolf Ranch Pkwy To SH29 3,130,000$ 500,000$ 12,500$ 512,500$ 99,281,125$
*D
Preliminary Engineering to begin developing Projects from
original Bond List to shovel ready: AC, AO, BU, BG, HH, 5,575,000$ 143,875$ 5,718,875$ 105,000,000$
105,000,000$
12 AC Williams Dr - Rivery Blvd. to Frontage Rd 1,406,300$
13 AO IH 35 SB Frontage Rd - Williams Dr To Rivery Blvd 3,271,875$
15 BU SE Inner Loop - Southwestern Blvd To IH 35 13,150,000$
17 BG SE Inner Loop - SH 29 To Southwestern Blvd 8,690,000$
20 HH Shell Rd - Williams Dr to Shell Spur Rd 14,930,000$
22 TT DB Wood Dr - Oak Ridge Dr To Lake Overlook Dr.13,904,400$
Phase 1 2015 Bond Program Project List Based on February 10 City Council Resolution
* C - Construction D - Design
Committed
Additional Project List to Address Priority Areas
Additional Project List to Address Committee Priorities
DeliveryTimeframe (All)
Row Labels
Pre-
Construction
Austin Avenue Bridges 2,075,840.00$
DB Wood Dr - Oak Ridge Dr To Lake Overlook Dr.3,476,100.00$
DB Wood Dr - SH 29 To Oak Ridge Dr 1,875,000.00$
IH 35 NB Frontage Road - Williams Dr To Lakeway Bridge 25,000.00$
IH 35 SB Frontage Rd - Williams Dr To Rivery Blvd 817,969.00$
Intersection/Capital Pool -$
Leander Rd (RM 2243) - 400ft W of SWBypass to River Ridge Dr 620,000.00$
Leander Rd Bridge @ IH 35 1,600,000.00$
NE Inner Loop - Stadium Dr To FM 971 732,000.00$
Northwest Blvd Bridge - Fontana Dr To Austin Ave -$
Rivery Blvd Extension - Williams Dr To Northwest Blvd 500,000.00$
SE Inner Loop - SH 29 To Southwestern Blvd 1,738,000.00$
SE Inner Loop - Southwestern Blvd To IH 35 2,630,000.00$
SH 29 (Haven Lane to SH130)2,520,000.00$
Shell Rd - Williams Dr to Shell Spur Rd 2,239,500.00$
Sidewalk, Safety and ADA Accessibility Pool -$
Southwest Bypass - Wolf Ranch Pkwy To Leander Rd 250,000.00$
Southwest Bypass- Wolf Ranch Pkwy To SH29 500,000.00$
Southwestern Blvd - Raintree Dr To SE Inner Loop 496,000.00$
Stadium Dr (CR 151) - Austin Ave To NE Inner Loop 572,000.00$
Williams Dr - Rivery Blvd. to Frontage Rd 281,260.00$
Wolf Ranch Pkwy - DB Wood Dr To Southwest Bypass 425,000.00$
(blank)
Grand Total 23,373,669.00$
Row Labels
Pre-
Construction
Austin Avenue Bridges 2,075,840.00$
DB Wood Dr - Oak Ridge Dr To Lake Overlook Dr.3,476,100.00$
DB Wood Dr - SH 29 To Oak Ridge Dr 1,875,000.00$
IH 35 NB Frontage Road - Williams Dr To Lakeway Bridge 25,000.00$
IH 35 SB Frontage Rd - Williams Dr To Rivery Blvd 817,969.00$
Intersection/Capital Pool -$
Leander Rd (RM 2243) - 400ft W of SWBypass to River Ridge Dr 620,000.00$
Leander Rd Bridge @ IH 35 1,600,000.00$
NE Inner Loop - Stadium Dr To FM 971 732,000.00$
Northwest Blvd Bridge - Fontana Dr To Austin Ave -$
Rivery Blvd Extension - Williams Dr To Northwest Blvd 500,000.00$
SE Inner Loop - SH 29 To Southwestern Blvd 1,738,000.00$
SE Inner Loop - Southwestern Blvd To IH 35 2,630,000.00$
SH 29 (Haven Lane to SH130)2,520,000.00$
Shell Rd - Williams Dr to Shell Spur Rd 2,239,500.00$
Sidewalk, Safety and ADA Accessibility Pool -$
Southwest Bypass - Wolf Ranch Pkwy To Leander Rd 250,000.00$
Southwest Bypass- Wolf Ranch Pkwy To SH29 500,000.00$
Southwestern Blvd - Raintree Dr To SE Inner Loop 496,000.00$
Stadium Dr (CR 151) - Austin Ave To NE Inner Loop 572,000.00$
Williams Dr - Rivery Blvd. to Frontage Rd 281,260.00$
Wolf Ranch Pkwy - DB Wood Dr To Southwest Bypass 425,000.00$
(blank)
Grand Total 23,373,669.00$
ROW
Utility
Relocation
Construction
Admin Construction
Preliminary Cost to
Complete
112,000.00$ 423,420.00$ 726,550.00$ 10,379,195.00$ 13,717,005.00$
-$ 25,000.00$ 556,176.00$ 13,904,400.00$ 17,970,000.00$
-$ 1,500,000.00$ 437,500.00$ 12,500,000.00$ 16,320,000.00$
401,000.00$ -$ 405,801.00$ 5,410,678.00$ 6,243,000.00$
-$ 100,000.00$ 245,391.00$ 3,271,875.00$ 4,436,000.00$
-$ -$ -$ 20,000,000.00$ -$
672,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 232,500.00$ 3,100,000.00$ 4,650,000.00$
67,200.00$ -$ 600,000.00$ 8,000,000.00$ 10,270,000.00$
355,188.24$ 100,000.00$ 73,200.00$ 3,660,000.00$ 4,921,000.00$
3,172,880.00$ 500,000.00$ 248,288.00$ 7,093,938.00$ 11,020,000.00$
1,613,920.00$ 1,100,000.00$ 192,500.00$ 5,500,000.00$ 8,907,000.00$
330,000.00$ 75,000.00$ 173,800.00$ 8,690,000.00$ 11,010,000.00$
10,041,276.96$ 100,000.00$ 460,250.00$ 13,150,000.00$ 26,390,000.00$
2,648,745.00$ 100,000.00$ 945,000.00$ 12,600,000.00$ 18,820,000.00$
904,828.32$ 100,000.00$ 298,600.00$ 14,930,000.00$ 18,480,000.00$
-$ -$ -$ 10,000,000.00$ -$
-$ 25,000.00$ 583,275.00$ 16,665,000.00$ 17,530,000.00$
-$ -$ 100,000.00$ 3,130,000.00$ 3,730,000.00$
176,337.00$ 496,000.00$ 74,400.00$ 2,480,000.00$ 3,723,000.00$
469,924.00$ 25,000.00$ 57,200.00$ 2,860,000.00$ 3,985,000.00$
-$ 100,000.00$ 105,473.00$ 1,406,300.00$ 1,894,000.00$
-$ -$ 92,750.00$ 2,650,000.00$ 3,168,000.00$
20,965,299.52$ 4,794,420.00$ 6,608,654.00$ 181,381,386.00$ 207,184,005.00$
ROW
Utility
Relocation
Construction
Admin Construction
Preliminary Cost to
Complete
112,000.00$ 423,420.00$ 726,550.00$ 10,379,195.00$ 13,717,005.00$
-$ 25,000.00$ 556,176.00$ 13,904,400.00$ 17,970,000.00$
-$ 1,500,000.00$ 437,500.00$ 12,500,000.00$ 16,320,000.00$
401,000.00$ -$ 405,801.00$ 5,410,678.00$ 6,243,000.00$
-$ 100,000.00$ 245,391.00$ 3,271,875.00$ 4,436,000.00$
-$ -$ -$ 20,000,000.00$ -$
672,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 232,500.00$ 3,100,000.00$ 4,650,000.00$
67,200.00$ -$ 600,000.00$ 8,000,000.00$ 10,270,000.00$
355,188.24$ 100,000.00$ 73,200.00$ 3,660,000.00$ 4,921,000.00$
3,172,880.00$ 500,000.00$ 248,288.00$ 7,093,938.00$ 11,020,000.00$
1,613,920.00$ 1,100,000.00$ 192,500.00$ 5,500,000.00$ 8,907,000.00$
330,000.00$ 75,000.00$ 173,800.00$ 8,690,000.00$ 11,010,000.00$
10,041,276.96$ 100,000.00$ 460,250.00$ 13,150,000.00$ 26,390,000.00$
2,648,745.00$ 100,000.00$ 945,000.00$ 12,600,000.00$ 18,820,000.00$
904,828.32$ 100,000.00$ 298,600.00$ 14,930,000.00$ 18,480,000.00$
-$ -$ -$ 10,000,000.00$ -$
-$ 25,000.00$ 583,275.00$ 16,665,000.00$ 17,530,000.00$
-$ -$ 100,000.00$ 3,130,000.00$ 3,730,000.00$
176,337.00$ 496,000.00$ 74,400.00$ 2,480,000.00$ 3,723,000.00$
469,924.00$ 25,000.00$ 57,200.00$ 2,860,000.00$ 3,985,000.00$
-$ 100,000.00$ 105,473.00$ 1,406,300.00$ 1,894,000.00$
-$ -$ 92,750.00$ 2,650,000.00$ 3,168,000.00$
20,965,299.52$ 4,794,420.00$ 6,608,654.00$ 181,381,386.00$ 207,184,005.00$
Potential Outside
Funding Net Cost
4,260,000.00$ 9,457,005.00$
17,970,000.00$
-$ 16,320,000.00$
-$ 6,243,000.00$
186,929.00$ 4,249,071.00$
-$ 10,000,000.00$
4,650,000.00$
6,270,000.00$ 4,000,000.00$
-$ 4,921,000.00$
-$ 11,020,000.00$
3,000,000.00$ 5,907,000.00$
11,010,000.00$
-$ 26,390,000.00$
14,820,000.00$ 4,000,000.00$
-$ 18,480,000.00$
-$ 10,000,000.00$
4,000,000.00$ 13,530,000.00$
-$ 3,730,000.00$
-$ 3,723,000.00$
-$ 3,985,000.00$
-$ 1,894,000.00$
-$ 3,168,000.00$
32,536,929.00$ 194,647,076.00$
Potential Outside
Funding Net Cost
4,260,000.00$ 9,457,005.00$
17,970,000.00$
-$ 16,320,000.00$
-$ 6,243,000.00$
186,929.00$ 4,249,071.00$
-$ 10,000,000.00$
4,650,000.00$
6,270,000.00$ 4,000,000.00$
$-
$10,000,000.00
$20,000,000.00
$30,000,000.00
$40,000,000.00
$50,000,000.00
$60,000,000.00
$70,000,000.00
$80,000,000.00
$90,000,000.00
-$ 4,921,000.00$
-$ 11,020,000.00$
3,000,000.00$ 5,907,000.00$
11,010,000.00$
-$ 26,390,000.00$
14,820,000.00$ 4,000,000.00$
-$ 18,480,000.00$
-$ 10,000,000.00$
4,000,000.00$ 13,530,000.00$
-$ 3,730,000.00$
-$ 3,723,000.00$
-$ 3,985,000.00$
-$ 1,894,000.00$
-$ 3,168,000.00$
32,536,929.00$ 194,647,076.00$
Net Cost
Potential Outside Funding
Preliminary Cost to Complete
Construction
Construction Admin
Utility Relocation
ROW
Pre-Construction
New
Order OTP GTAB
Roadway
Project Commitment
Functional
Classification
No. of
Lanes
Project
Length
(ft)
Project
Length
(Mi)
ROW
Needed
(ft)
ROW
Needed
(acres)
ROW Est.
$/sq ft Cost/Acre
Delivery
Timeframe Construction
Pre-
Construction Utility Relocation
Construction
Admin ROW Extension
Initial Proposed
Bond Cost
Preliminary
Cost to
Complete
Potential
Outside
Funding
Net Cost
to Complete
(Bond Package)
Cummulative
Total Partner Match
1 CT - Austin Avenue Bridges
High Minor Arterial 5 1,771 0.34 TBD TBD 7.00$ 304,920$ Short 10,379,195$ 2,075,840$ 423,420$ 726,550$ 112,000$ 13,717,005$ 13,717,005$ 4,260,000$ 9,457,005$ $ 9,457,005 CAMPO 60%
2 AE 28 Northwest Blvd Bridge - Fontana Dr To Austin Ave High Commitment Major Arterial 5 2,333 0.44 136 7.28 10.00$ 435,600$ Short 7,093,938$ -$ 500,000$ 248,288$ 3,172,880$ 11,015,106$ 11,020,000$ 11,020,000$ -$ 11,020,000$ #VALUE!
3 AD 25 Rivery Blvd Extension - Williams Dr To Northwest Blvd High Commitment Collector 4 2,620 0.50 112 6.74 5.50$ 239,580$ Short 5,500,000$ 500,000$ 1,100,000$ 192,500$ 1,613,920$ 8,906,420$ 8,907,000$ 8,907,000$ 3,000,000$ 5,907,000$ #VALUE!
4 AF 24 IH 35 NB Frontage Road - Williams Dr To Lakeway Bridge High Commitment Frontage 2 10,025 1.90 4 0.92 10.00$ 435,600$ Short 5,410,678$ 25,000$ -$ 405,801$ 401,000$ 6,242,479$ 6,243,000$ 6,243,000$ -$ 6,243,000$ #VALUE! TxDOT 0%
5 AZ1 27 Southwest Bypass - Wolf Ranch Pkwy To Leander Rd Medium Commitment Freeway 6 7,026 1.33 200 32.26 Existing Existing
Medium 16,665,000$ 250,000$ 25,000$ 583,275$ Existing 17,523,275$ 17,530,000$ 17,530,000$ 4,000,000$ 13,530,000$ #VALUE!
6 BC 14 Wolf Ranch Pkwy - DB Wood Dr To Southwest Bypass Medium Commitment Minor Arterial 5 5,561 1.05 112 14.30 Existing Existing
Medium 2,650,000$ 425,000$ -$ 92,750$ Existing 3,167,750$ 3,168,000$ 3,168,000$ -$ 3,168,000$ #VALUE! TxDOT 0%
7 -39 Intersection/Capital Pool High - NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Short 20,000,000$ NA NA NA NA NA NA NA -$ 10,000,000$ #VALUE!
8 CS CS Leander Rd Bridge @ IH 35 High - NA 560 0.27 20 0.26 6.00$ 261,360$ Short 8,000,000$ 1,600,000$ -$ 600,000$ 67,200$ 10,267,200$ 10,270,000$ 10,270,000$ 6,270,000$ 4,000,000$ #VALUE!TxDOT 40%
9 -Sidewalk, Safety and ADA Accessibility Pool High - NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Short 10,000,000$ NA NA NA NA NA NA NA -$ 10,000,000$ #VALUE!
10 BJ2 Leander Rd (RM 2243) - 400ft W of SWBypass to River Ridge DrMedium Major Arterial 5 2,800 0.53 120 7.71 2.00$ 87,120.00$ Medium 3,100,000$ 620,000$ 25,000$ 232,500$ 672,000$ 4,649,500$ 4,650,000$ 4,650,000$ 4,650,000$ #VALUE! TxDOT 0%
11 AN 16 DB Wood Dr - SH 29 To Oak Ridge Dr Medium Minor Arterial 5 7,699 1.46 0 0.00 Existing Existing
Medium 12,500,000$ 1,875,000$ 1,500,000$ 437,500$ Existing 16,312,500$ 16,320,000$ 16,320,000$ -$ 16,320,000$ #VALUE!
12 AC 15 Williams Dr - Rivery Blvd. to Frontage Rd Medium Major Arterial 5 2,009 0.38 0 0.00 9.00$ 392,040$ Medium 1,406,300$ 281,260$ 100,000$ 105,473$ Existing 1,893,033$ 1,894,000$ 1,894,000$ -$ 1,894,000$ #VALUE!
13 AO 22 IH 35 SB Frontage Rd - Williams Dr To Rivery Blvd Long Term Frontage 2 2,862 0.54 0 0.00 10.00$ 435,600$ Long 3,271,875$ 817,969$ 100,000$ 245,391$ Existing 4,435,235$ 4,436,000$ 4,436,000$ 186,929$ 4,249,071$ #VALUE!
14 AJ 10 NE Inner Loop - Stadium Dr To FM 971 High Major Arterial 5 3,302 0.63 varies 2.72 3.00$ 130,680$ Short 3,660,000$ 732,000$ 100,000$ 73,200$ 355,188$ 4,920,388$ 4,921,000$ 4,921,000$ -$ 4,921,000$ #VALUE!
15 BU 21 SE Inner Loop - Southwestern Blvd To IH 35 Medium Freeway 6 13,052 2.47 0 57.63 4.00$ 174,240$ Medium 13,150,000$ 2,630,000$ 100,000$ 460,250$ 10,041,277$ 26,381,527$ 26,390,000$ 26,390,000$ -$ 26,390,000$ #VALUE!
16 CQ 11 Stadium Dr (CR 151) - Austin Ave To NE Inner Loop Medium Minor Arterial 5 2,582 0.49 52 3.08 3.50$ 152,460$ Medium 2,860,000$ 572,000$ 25,000$ 57,200$ 469,924$ 3,984,124$ 3,985,000$ 3,985,000$ -$ 3,985,000$ #VALUE!
17 BG 20 SE Inner Loop - SH 29 To Southwestern Blvd High Bond Minor Arterial 5 7,839 1.48 55 1.89 4 174240 Short 8,690,000$ 1,738,000$ 75,000$ 173,800$ 330,000$ 11,006,800$ 11,010,000$ 11,010,000$ 11,010,000$ #VALUE!
18 BP 13 Southwestern Blvd - Raintree Dr To SE Inner Loop Medium Collector 4 2,799 0.53 18 1.16 3.50$ 152,460$ Medium 2,480,000$ 496,000$ 496,000$ 74,400$ 176,337$ 3,722,737$ 3,723,000$ 3,723,000$ -$ 3,723,000$ #VALUE!
19 AZ2 - Southwest Bypass- Wolf Ranch Pkwy To SH29 Freeway 6 2,825 0.54 200 12.97 Existing Existing
Medium 3,130,000$ 500,000$ -$ 100,000$ Existing 3,730,000$ 3,730,000$ 3,730,000$ -$ 3,730,000$ #VALUE!
20 HH 23 Shell Rd - Williams Dr to Shell Spur Rd Long Term Major Arterial 5 12,936 2.45 varies 3.46 6 261360 Long 14,930,000$ 2,239,500$ 100,000$ 298,600$ 904,828$ 18,472,928$ 18,480,000$ 18,480,000$ -$ 18,480,000$ #VALUE!
21 AT 41 SH 29 (Haven Lane to SH130)Medium Major Arterial 5 10,702 2.03 45 11.06 5.50$ 239,580$ Medium 12,600,000$ 2,520,000$ 100,000$ 945,000$ 2,648,745$ 18,813,745$ 18,820,000$ 18,820,000$ 14,820,000$ 4,000,000$ #VALUE!TxDOT 20%
22 TT 17 DB Wood Dr - Oak Ridge Dr To Lake Overlook Dr. Long Term Major Arterial 5 9,300 1.76 0 0.00 4 174240 Long 13,904,400$ 3,476,100$ 25,000$ 556,176$ Existing 17,961,676$ 17,970,000$ 17,970,000$ 17,970,000$ #VALUE!
-$
181,381,386$ 194,647,076$
1 BZ 32 Rabbit Hill Rd - Blue Springs Blvd To Westinghouse Rd Long Term Collector 5 7,831 1.48 32 5.75 5.50$ 239,580$ Long 8,680,000$ 1,736,000$ 100,000$ 260,400$ 1,378,256$ 12,154,656$ 12,160,000$ 12,160,000$ 12,160,000$ 12,160,000$
2 QQ 19 Airport Rd - Lakeway Dr To Berry Creek Dr Medium Minor Arterial 5 11,691 2.21 57 15.30 5.00$ 217,800$ Medium 12,950,000$ 2,590,000$ 100,000$ 388,500$ 3,331,935$ 19,360,435$ 19,370,000$ 19,370,000$ -$ 19,370,000$ 31,530,000$
3 BJ1 30 Leander Rd (RM 2243) - Gary Park To 400' West of SW BypassMedium Major Arterial 5 24,881 4.71 120 68.54 2.00$ 87,120$ Medium 27,570,000$ 5,514,000$ 25,000$ 2,067,750$ 5,971,440$ 41,148,190$ 41,150,000$ 41,150,000$ 41,150,000$ 72,680,000$ TxDOT
4 AF2 24b IH 35 NB Frontage Road - Lakeway Bridge To SH 130 Long Term Frontage 2 4,661 0.88 7 0.75 8.00$ 348,480$ Long 2,070,000$ 414,000$ 25,000$ 155,250$ 261,016$ 2,925,266$ 2,926,000$ 2,926,000$ 2,926,000$ 75,606,000$ TxDOT
5 BV 35 Southwestern Blvd - Sam Houston Ave To Westinghouse RdLong Term Major Arterial 5 6,456 1.22 67 9.93 2.50$ 108,900$ Long 7,150,000$ 1,430,000$ 100,000$ 143,000$ 1,081,380$ 9,904,380$ 9,905,000$ 9,905,000$ -$ 9,905,000$ 85,511,000$
6 CP 33 Rockride Ln - SE Inner Loop To Southwestern Blvd Medium Collector 4 8,350 1.58 24 5.04 2.50$ 108,900$ Medium 7,400,000$ 1,480,000$ 25,000$ 222,000$ 548,875$ 9,675,875$ 9,676,000$ 9,676,000$ 9,676,000$ 95,187,000$
7 XX 18 Airport Rd - IH 35 To Lakeway Dr Long Term Minor Arterial 5 3,073 0.58 57 4.02 5.00$ 217,800$ Long 3,400,000$ 680,000$ 700,000$ 102,000$ 875,805$ 5,757,805$ 5,758,000$ 5,758,000$ 5,758,000$ 100,945,000$
8 JJ 23b Shell Rd - Shell Spur To SH 195 Long Term Major Arterial 5 8,448 1.60 54 10.47 5 217800 Long 13,528,000$ 2,705,600$ -$ 473,480$ 2,280,960$ 18,988,040$ 18,990,000$ 18,990,000$ 18,990,000$ 119,935,000$
9 CR 12 CR 152 - Stadium Dr (CR 151) To City Limits Long Term Collector 4 4,050 0.77 15 1.39 5.00$ 217,800$ Long 5,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 25,000$ 150,000$ 303,750$ 6,478,750$ 6,479,000$ 6,479,000$ 6,479,000$ 126,414,000$
10 CN 34 Southwestern Blvd - Westinghouse Rd To ETJ Long Term Major Arterial 5 2,885 0.55 0 0.00 2.50$ 108,900$ Long 3,200,000$ 640,000$ 200,000$ 96,000$ Existing 4,136,000$ 4,136,000$ 4,136,000$ 4,136,000$ 4,136,000$ 130,550,000$
82,268,000$ 325,197,076$
1 CK 31 Mays - Teravista Pkwy To Westinghouse Rd High Minor Arterial 5 8,829 1.67 40 8.11 10.00$ 435,600$ Short 9,020,000$ 1,804,000$ 25,000$ 270,600$ 3,531,600$ 14,651,200$ 14,660,000$ 14,660,000$ 14,660,000$ 145,210,000$ TIRZ
2 CJ 38 Westinghouse Rd - IH 35 To FM 1460 Long Term Major Arterial 6 11,314 2.14 0 0.00 8.00$ 348,480$ Long 15,040,000$ 3,008,000$ 50,000$ 451,200$ Existing 18,549,200$ 18,550,000$ 18,550,000$ 18,550,000$ 163,760,000$ TIRZ
3 CL 36 Westinghouse Rd - FM 1460 To Southwestern Blvd Medium Bond Major Arterial 5 9,649 1.83 67 14.84 2.50$ 108,900$ Medium 10,690,000$ 2,138,000$ 1,069,000$ 320,700$ 1,616,208$ 15,833,908$ 15,840,000$ 15,840,000$ 15,840,000$ 179,600,000$ WilCo
4 BK 26 Southwest Bypass - Leander Rd To I 35 Medium Bond Freeway 2 9,335 1.77 0 0 0 Medium 16,200,000$ -$ 25,000$ 50,000$ Existing 16,275,000$ 16,280,000$ 16,280,000$ 16,200,000$ 80,000$ 179,680,000$ WilCo
5 CM 37 Westinghouse Rd - Southwestern Blvd To SH 130 Long Term Bond Major Arterial 5 12,113 2.29 136 37.82 2.50$ 108,900$ Long 13,420,000$ 2,684,000$ 50,000$ 402,600$ 4,118,420$ 20,675,020$ 20,680,000$ 20,680,000$ 20,680,000$ 200,360,000$ WilCo
$64,370,000 $395,007,076
New
Order OTP Roadway
Project Commitment Functional
Classification
No. of
Lanes
Project
Length
(ft)
Project
Length
(Mi)
ROW
Needed
(ft)
ROW
Needed
(acres)
ROW Est.
$/sq ft
Cost/Acre Delivery
Timeframe Construction Pre-
Construction Utility Relocation Construction
Admin ROW Extension
Initial Proposed
Bond Cost
Preliminary
Cost to
Complete
Potential
Outside
Funding
Project Costs Contigency Issuance
Net Cost
to Complete Cumulative Partner Match
1 CT Austin Avenue Bridges High Minor Arterial 5 1,771 0.34 TBD TBD 7.00$ 304,920$ Short 10,379,195$ 2,075,840$ 423,420$ 726,550$ 112,000$ 13,717,005$ 13,717,005$ 1,000,000$ 12,717,005$ 1,271,701$ 317,925$ $ 14,306,631 $ 14,306,631 CAMPO 60%
2 AE Northwest Blvd Bridge - Fontana Dr To Austin Ave High Commitment Major Arterial 5 2,333 0.44 136 7.28 10.00$ 435,600$ Short 7,093,938$ -$ 500,000$ 248,288$ 3,172,880$ 11,015,106$ 11,020,000$ 11,020,000$ -$ 11,020,000$ 1,102,000$ 275,500$ $ 12,397,500 $ 26,704,131
3 AD Rivery Blvd Extension - Williams Dr To Northwest Blvd High Commitment Collector 4 2,620 0.50 112 6.74 5.50$ 239,580$ Short 5,500,000$ 500,000$ 1,100,000$ 192,500$ 1,613,920$ 8,906,420$ 8,907,000$ 8,907,000$ 3,000,000$ 5,907,000$ 590,700$ 147,675$ $ 6,645,375 $ 33,349,506
4 AF IH 35 NB Frontage Road - Williams Dr To Lakeway Bridge High Commitment Frontage 2 10,025 1.90 4 0.92 10.00$ 435,600$ Short 5,410,678$ 25,000$ -$ 405,801$ 401,000$ 6,242,479$ 6,243,000$ 6,243,000$ -$ 6,243,000$ 624,300$ 156,075$ $ 7,023,375 $ 40,372,881 TxDOT 0%
5 AZ1 Southwest Bypass - Wolf Ranch Pkwy To Leander Rd Medium Commitment Freeway 6 7,026 1.33 200 32.26 Existing Existing Medium 16,665,000$ 250,000$ 25,000$ 583,275$ -$ 17,523,275$ 17,530,000$ 17,530,000$ 4,000,000$ 13,530,000$ 1,353,000$ 338,250$ $ 15,221,250 $ 55,594,131 TxDOT -$
6 BC Wolf Ranch Pkwy - DB Wood Dr To Southwest Bypass Medium Commitment Minor Arterial 5 5,561 1.05 112 14.30 Existing Existing
Medium 2,650,000$ 425,000$ -$ 92,750$ -$ 3,167,750$ 3,168,000$ 3,168,000$ -$ 3,168,000$ 316,800$ 79,200$ $ 3,564,000 $ 59,158,131
7 -Intersection/Capital Pool High - NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Short 20,000,000$ NA NA NA -$ NA NA NA -$ 10,000,000$ -$ 250,000$ $ 10,250,000 $ 69,408,131
8 CS Leander Rd Bridge @ IH 35 High - NA 560 0.27 20 0.26 6.00$ 261,360$ Short 8,000,000$ 1,600,000$ -$ 600,000$ 67,200$ 10,267,200$ 10,270,000$ 10,270,000$ 6,270,000$ 4,000,000$ 400,000$ 100,000$ $ 4,500,000 $ 73,908,131 TxDOT 0%
9 -Sidewalk, Safety and ADA Accessibility Pool High - NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Medium 10,000,000$ NA NA NA -$ NA NA NA -$ 10,000,000$ -$ 250,000$ $ 10,250,000 $ 84,158,131
10 BJ2 Leander Rd (RM 2243) - 400ft W of SWBypass to River Ridge DrMedium Major Arterial 5 2,800 0.53 120 7.71 2.00$ 87,120.00$ Medium 3,100,000$ 620,000$ 25,000$ 232,500$ 672,000$ 4,649,500$ 4,650,000$ 4,650,000$ 4,650,000$ 465,000$ 116,250$ $ 5,231,250 $ 89,389,381
11 AN DB Wood Dr - SH 29 To Oak Ridge Dr Medium Minor Arterial 5 7,699 1.46 0 0.00 Existing Existing Medium 12,500,000$ 1,875,000$ 1,500,000$ 437,500$ -$ 16,312,500$ 16,320,000$ 16,320,000$ -$ 16,320,000$ 1,632,000$ 408,000$ $ 18,360,000 $ 107,749,381
12 AC Williams Dr - Rivery Blvd. to Frontage Rd Medium Major Arterial 5 2,009 0.38 0 0.00 9.00$ 392,040$ Medium 1,406,300$ 281,260$ 100,000$ 105,473$ -$ 1,893,033$ 1,894,000$ 1,894,000$ -$ 1,894,000$ 189,400$ 47,350$ $ 2,130,750 $ 109,880,131
13 AO IH 35 SB Frontage Rd - Williams Dr To Rivery Blvd Long Term Frontage 2 2,862 0.54 0 0.00 10.00$ 435,600$ Long 3,271,875$ 817,969$ 100,000$ 245,391$ -$ 4,435,235$ 4,436,000$ 4,436,000$ 186,929$ 4,249,071$ 424,907$ 106,227$ $ 4,780,205 $ 114,660,336
14 AJ NE Inner Loop - Stadium Dr To FM 971 High Major Arterial 5 3,302 0.63 varies 2.72 3.00$ 130,680$ Short 3,660,000$ 732,000$ 100,000$ 73,200$ 355,188$ 4,920,388$ 4,921,000$ 4,921,000$ -$ 4,921,000$ 492,100$ 123,025$ $ 5,536,125 $ 120,196,461 TxDOT 0$
15 BU SE Inner Loop - Southwestern Blvd To IH 35 Medium Freeway 6 13,052 2.47 0 57.63 4.00$ 174,240$ Medium 13,150,000$ 2,630,000$ 100,000$ 460,250$ 10,041,277$ 26,381,527$ 26,390,000$ 26,390,000$ -$ 26,390,000$ 2,639,000$ 659,750$ $ 29,688,750 $ 149,885,211
16 CQ Stadium Dr (CR 151) - Austin Ave To NE Inner Loop Medium Minor Arterial 5 2,582 0.49 52 3.08 3.50$ 152,460$ Medium 2,860,000$ 572,000$ 25,000$ 57,200$ 469,924$ 3,984,124$ 3,985,000$ 3,985,000$ -$ 3,985,000$ 398,500$ 99,625$ $ 4,483,125 $ 154,368,336
17 BG SE Inner Loop - SH 29 To Southwestern Blvd High Bond Minor Arterial 5 7,839 1.48 55 1.89 4 174240 Short 8,690,000$ 1,738,000$ 75,000$ 173,800$ 330,000$ 11,006,800$ 11,010,000$ 11,010,000$ 11,010,000$ 1,101,000$ 275,250$ $ 12,386,250 $ 166,754,586
18 BP Southwestern Blvd - Raintree Dr To SE Inner Loop Medium Collector 4 2,799 0.53 18 1.16 3.50$ 152,460$ Medium 2,480,000$ 496,000$ 496,000$ 74,400$ 176,337$ 3,722,737$ 3,723,000$ 3,723,000$ -$ 3,723,000$ 372,300$ 93,075$ $ 4,188,375 $ 170,942,961
19 AZ2 Southwest Bypass- Wolf Ranch Pkwy To SH29 Freeway 6 2,825 0.54 200 12.97 Existing Existing Medium 3,130,000$ 500,000$ -$ 100,000$ -$ 3,730,000$ 3,730,000$ 3,730,000$ -$ 3,730,000$ 373,000$ 93,250$ $ 4,196,250 $ 175,139,211
20 HH Shell Rd - Williams Dr to Shell Spur Rd Long Term Major Arterial 5 12,936 2.45 varies 3.46 6 261360 Long 14,930,000$ 2,239,500$ 100,000$ 298,600$ 904,828$ 18,472,928$ 18,480,000$ 18,480,000$ -$ 18,480,000$ 1,848,000$ 462,000$ $ 20,790,000 $ 195,929,211 TxDOT 0$
21 AT SH 29 (Haven Lane to SH130)Medium Major Arterial 5 10,702 2.03 45 11.06 5.50$ 239,580$ Medium 12,600,000$ 2,520,000$ 100,000$ 945,000$ 2,648,745$ 18,813,745$ 18,820,000$ 18,820,000$ 14,820,000$ 4,000,000$ 400,000$ 100,000$ $ 4,500,000 $ 200,429,211
22 TT DB Wood Dr - Oak Ridge Dr To Lake Overlook Dr. Long Term Major Arterial 5 9,300 1.76 0 0.00 4 174240 Long 13,904,400$ 3,476,100$ 25,000$ 556,176$ -$ 17,961,676$ 17,970,000$ 17,970,000$ 17,970,000$ 1,797,000$ 449,250$ $ 20,216,250 $ 220,645,461
181,381,386$ 197,907,076$
Southwest Bypass- Wolf Rancj
Rivery Blvd Construction Time Calc Modified Const Time Preconstruction Time CalcModified Precon Time ROW ROW time after PreCon
Northwest Blvd Bridge Assume $400,000/month Assume $50,000/month Begins 1/2 thru design
Austin Avenue Bridges 26 18 42 18 6 0
Northwest Blvd Bridge - Fontana Dr To Austin Ave 18 18 0 18 18 9
Rivery Blvd Extension - Williams Dr To Northwest Blvd 14 12 10 10 18 13
IH 35 NB Frontage Road - Williams Dr To Lakeway Bridge 14 12 1 18 6 0
Southwest Bypass - Wolf Ranch Pkwy To Leander Rd 42 5 0 0
Wolf Ranch Pkwy - DB Wood Dr To Southwest Bypass 7 20 9 18 0 0
Intersection/Capital Pool 50 12 #VALUE!12 0 0
Leander Rd Bridge @ IH 35 20 22 32 12 6 0
Sidewalk, Safety and ADA Accessibility Pool 25 #VALUE!0 0
Leander Rd (RM 2243) - 400ft W of SWBypass to River Ridge Dr 8 24 12 6 12 9
DB Wood Dr - SH 29 To Oak Ridge Dr 31 9 38 6 0 0
Williams Dr - Rivery Blvd. to Frontage Rd 4 8 6 9 0 0
IH 35 SB Frontage Rd - Williams Dr To Rivery Blvd 8 30 16 16 0 0
NE Inner Loop - Stadium Dr To FM 971 9 6 15 6 6 3