Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda_GTAB_07.14.2017
Notice of Meeting for the Georgetown Transportation Adv isory Board and the Gov erning Body of the City of Georgetown July 14, 2017 at 10:00 AM at GMC Building - 300-1 Industrial Av e, Georgetown, TX 78626 The City o f G eo rgeto wn is committed to comp lianc e with the Americans with Dis abilities Ac t (ADA). If yo u req uire as s is tanc e in participating at a p ublic meeting d ue to a disability, as d efined und er the ADA, reas onab le as s is tance, ad ap tatio ns , or acc o mmo d ations will b e provid ed up o n req uest. P leas e c o ntact the City Sec retary's Office, at leas t three (3) days prior to the sc hed uled meeting d ate, at (512) 930-3652 o r City Hall at 113 Eas t 8th Street fo r add itional info rmation; TTY us ers ro ute through Relay Texas at 711. Regular Session (This Regular S es s io n may, at any time, b e rec es s ed to convene an Exec utive S es s io n fo r any p urpose authorized b y the Op en Meetings Act, Texas Go vernment Co d e 551.) A Call to Ord er The Board may, at any time, rec es s the R egular S es s io n to convene in Exec utive S es s io n at the reques t of the Chair, a Board Memb er, the City Manager, As s is tant City Manager, G eneral Manager of Utilities, City Co uncil Member, o r legal c o uns el for any p urpos e authorized b y the Op en Meetings Act, Texas Government C o d e Chapter 551, and are s ubjec t to actio n in the Regular Ses s ion that follows . B Introduction of Vis itors C Ind ustry/C AMP O/TXDOT Updates - Ed P o las ek, Transportation Planning Coordinator D July 2017 GTAB Up d ates E Dis cus s ion regard ing the Airp o rt Mo nthly Report and P ro ject Time Lines . – R us s Volk, C.M., Airport Manager and Oc tavio A. Garza, P.E, C.P.M., Pub lic Wo rks Direc tor. Legislativ e Regular Agenda F Review and p o s s ib le ac tion to approve the minutes from the regular GTAB Board meeting held o n June 9, 2017. - Cindy Alejand ro – GTAB Bo ard Liais on G Co nsideration and possible recommendatio n to ap p ro ve the Airport Ord inanc e 12.32. - Geo rgeto wn Munic ip al Airp o rt Use Regulatio ns – Rus s Vo lk, C.M., Airp o rt Manager and Octavio A. Garza, P.E, C.P.M., P ublic Works Directo r H Co nsideration and possible recommendatio n to ap p ro ve the Airport Minimum S tand ard s – Rus s Vo lk, C.M., Airport Manager and Octavio A. Garza, P.E, C.P.M., P ublic Works Direc tor I Co nsideration and rec o mmendatio n o n Tas k Ord er S BE-17-001 with Steger Bizzell of Geo rgeto wn, TX in the amo unt of $101,687.00 fo r 2017 Drainage Improvements - Wes ley Wright, P.E., S ystems Engineering Directo r J Co nsideration and rec o mmendatio n o n Tas k Ord er S BE-17-002 with Steger Bizzell of Geo rgeto wn, TX in the amo unt of $173,124.00 fo r professional engineering s ervic es related to the Old Town Northeast Sid ewalk Imp ro vements - Wesley Wright, P.E., S ystems Engineering Direc to r Page 1 of 164 K Co nsideration and rec o mmendatio n o n award of a bid to Jordan Fo s ter C o ns truc tion of Pflugerville, TX in the amount of $5,599,200.86 fo r c o nstruc tio n o f the Southwest Bypas s , S egment 1 - Wesley Wright, P.E., Systems Engineering Directo r Adjournment CERTIFICATE OF POSTING I, Shelley No wling, C ity S ecretary fo r the C ity of Geo rgeto wn, Texas , d o hereby c ertify that this Notice of Meeting was p o s ted at City Hall, 113 E. 8th Street, a p lace read ily acc es s ible to the general p ublic at all times , on the ______ d ay o f __________________, 2017, at __________, and remained so p o s ted fo r at leas t 72 c o ntinuo us ho urs p receding the sc heduled time o f s aid meeting. ____________________________________ S helley No wling, City Sec retary Page 2 of 164 City of Georgetown, Texas Transportation Advisory Board July 14, 2017 SUBJECT: July 2017 GTAB Updates ITEM SUMMARY: Austin Avenue Bridges Project - N & S San Gabriel Rivers: Following Pub lic Meeting #3 held o n May 11, 2017, s taff and cons ultants are finalizing the Pub lic Meeting Summary and evaluatio n o f 5 alternatives moving forward in the enviro nmental proc es s . TxDOT is reviewing the His toric Res o urc es S urvey Rep o rt and p rep aring for the Section 106 c o nsultatio n p ro cess to b e held later this S ummer. F o llo wing this c ons ultation proc es s staff and the c o ns ultant will p res ent City Counc il a No Build and P referred Alternative that meets the 106 Cons ultatio n Proc es s and environmental clearance p roc es s . Flood Study: Pub lic Meeting s c heduled for Wed nesday, July 26th to obtain p ublic inp ut o n kno wn flooding is s ues and d is cus s preliminary res ults. Study ongoing. P reliminary flood s tud y res ults are c o mp lete. Mitigation effo rts are c urrently b eing evaluated . Draft res ults expec ted late s ummer 2017. Final report due end of 2017. FM 971 - Realignment at Austin Avenue: Preliminary Engineering complete. Engineer’s wo rk fo r the 60% design s ub mittal is o n hold p ending AFA with TxDOT. Sub mittal of p reliminary signal des ign to T xDOT 11-17-16. AFA d o cuments finalized and will b e presented in Augus t. FM 1460: Utility relo catio n complete. Cons truc tio n o ngo ing and adminis tered by TxDOT, I 35 SB FR Sidewalk Improvements Project (University Ave to Leander Rd): Cons tructio n Approximately 65% complete with flatwo rk complete from SH29 to the S o uth Gab riel River Brid ge. Ac ces s ib le ramp s tructure cons truction underway. Anticipate c o mpletio n b y Septemb er. Southwest Bypass (RM 2243 to IH 35) Phase 1 – WPAP for p hase 1 approved . On s ite tasks : Phas e 1 Ho use d emo lition c omplete, Contour survey c o mp lete, Geo tec hnical testing complete, Fenc ing c o mp lete. P hase One b id o p ening was June 27th. Southwest Bypass (RM 2243 to IH 35) Phase 2 – County let p reliminary c ons tructio n p ro ject for p has e 2 which includes the c o nstruc tion of ramp s into and out o f the Quarry, c ompletio n s ched uled fo r July. Surveying and s taking of p hase 2 o ngo ing. Southwest Bypass (Leander Rd. to Wolf Ranch Parkway Extension) Wolf Ranch Parkway Extension (SW Bypass to DB Wood Rd.) Cons tructio n is ap p ro ximately 70% c o mp lete projec t wide. S o uth San Gab riel bridge beam s et is c o mp lete alo ng with 90% dec k p anels. S econd bridge s o uth o f the Gab riel, b eam set c omplete. Bas e c o urse installed o n the So uth s ide o f the b rid ges with firs t co urs e As p halt ins talled to South Brid ge. Base cours e ins tallation o n Wo lf Ranc h P kwy und erway, utility cross ings for Hillwo o d sub d ivision c omplete. First c o urse o f as p halt no rth o f river to be s ched uled s hortly. Page 3 of 164 Transit Service (Fixed Route Bus): Sto p s and Routes updated and presented to C o uncil 2/14/17. ADA Plan meeting with CMTA 2/28. CMTA will p ro vide eligib ility s c reening. Co uncil adopted s ervice p lan 4/25/17. Grand Opening sc heduled for 8/21 at 1pm. 2015 Road Bond Program, Citywide Sidewalk Improvements Project Cons tructio n s tarted May 1, 2017. All flat wo rk alo ng Williams drive is comp lete, with revegetation and s ignal wo rk underway. Williams Drive Ped Heads o p erational. 8th and Ro ck work has started. Williams Drive Study: Concept Plan F inal rep o rt expec ted 3/1/17. C o unc il to cons id er ac ceptanc e o f P lan o n July 11th, adopt 4 year imp lementatio n p lan. FINANCIAL IMPACT: N/A SUBMITTED BY: Wes ley Wright, P.E., S ystems Engineering Direc to r/Mic hael Hallmark, CIP Manager. ATTACHMENTS: Description Type July 2017 Project Updates Backup Material Page 4 of 164 Page 5 of 164 Page 6 of 164 Page 7 of 164 Page 8 of 164 Page 9 of 164 Page 10 of 164 Page 11 of 164 Page 12 of 164 Page 13 of 164 Page 14 of 164 Page 15 of 164 City of Georgetown, Texas Transportation Advisory Board July 14, 2017 SUBJECT: Disc ussion regarding the Airport Monthly Rep o rt and Projec t Time Lines . – Rus s Vo lk, C.M., Airp o rt Manager and O c tavio A. Garza, P.E, C.P.M., P ublic Works Directo r. ITEM SUMMARY: Airport Reports: · Cons tructio n Projec t Report · Airp o rt Mas ter Plan Rep o rt · Op erations Rep o rt · Fuel S ales Rep o rt · Hangar / Tie-Do wn Leas e Report · 2017 Ac complishments and Projec ts · Avgas F uel Pric e Co mp aris on · Jet A F uel Pric e Co mp aris on · Airport Monthly Financ ial Report FINANCIAL IMPACT: N/A SUBMITTED BY: Rus s Vo lk, C.M., Airport Manager ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Cons truction Project Update Backup Material Mas ter Plan Update Backup Material Operations Report Backup Material Fuel Sales Report Backup Material Hangar/Tie-Down Report Backup Material 2017 Goals and Accomplis hments Backup Material Avgas Price Comparis on Backup Material Jet A Price Comparis on Backup Material Airport Detailed Financial Report Backup Material Airport Monthly Financial Report Backup Material Page 16 of 164 Airport Improvements Project No. 1514GRGTN Jun 2017 Project Description FY2015 project: Construction of Fuel Storage Tanks, Parallel Taxiway A, Pavement Maintenance Purpose Improved safety and reliability of airport Project Manager Russ Volk C.M., Airport Manager Project Engineer Garver Notes: Oct 2014 - Council Resolution 101414-F – Approval to Debt Fund $870K for project Mar 2015 - Council Resolution 032415-G – Authorization for City to Sell Certificates of Obligation to fund project Jan 28, 2016 – Transportation Commission approval of $8.3M Grant Jan 29, 2016 – City cost share of $830K wire transferred to TxDOT Aviation per payment instructions from TxDOT Jun 10, 2016 – Following completion of bidding process being conducted under grant 1314GRGTN, TxDOT will provide Airport Project Participation Agreement for City consideration Jun 28, 2016 – City Council consideration of Airport Project Participation Agreement Jun 22, 2016 – Pre-Construction Meeting Page 17 of 164 Jul 7, 2016 – Planned start date for construction Jul 14, 2016 – Start date for construction Nov 11, 2016 – Placement of compactible rock/gravel for new asphalt surface, placement of storm drain pipe, underground utility work at airport terminal Dec 8, 2016 – Placement of compactible rock/gravel for new asphalt surface, concrete foundations for new fuel tanks, tree clearing in runway clear zone followed by fence installation Jan 13, 2017 – Placement of compactible rock/gravel for new asphalt surface, placement of new fuel tanks, fence installation in runway clear zone Feb 10, 2017 – Placement of FAA spec base material for new asphalt surface, plumbing of new fuel tanks and self-serve dispensers, fence installation in runway clear zone Mar 10, 2017 – Placement of FAA spec base material for new asphalt surface, testing and certification of new fuel storage facility, soak testing of new fuel tanks. Apr 14, 2017 – Placement of FAA spec base material for new asphalt surface, now using new fuel tanks, preparing to remove old fuel system. May 12, 2017 – Placement of Phase 1 of asphalt for new taxiway. Beginning crack seal and seal coat effort on existing taxiways. Installation of new storm drain pipe. Jun 9, 2017 – Working punch list from Phase 1 asphalt pavement. Crack seal and seal coat effort on existing taxiways. Installation of new storm drain pipe. Old Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) removed from Airport. Jul 14, 2017 – Opened Phase 1 asphalt pavement for airplane use. Crack seal and seal coat effort on existing taxiways. Installation of new storm drain pipe. Cleaning paved shoulders of Runway 18/36. Beginning construction of connecting Taxiway D. Page 18 of 164 Airport Improvements Project No. 16MPGRGTN Jun 2017 Project Description FY2016 project: Airport Master Plan Update Purpose Update to 2005 Airport Master Plan Project Manager Russ Volk C.M., Airport Manager Project Estimate $213,290 Project Engineer Coffman Associates Jan 28 – Transportation Commission approval of $200K Grant Feb 19 – Solicitation for Consultant Qualifications Mar 29 – Consultant Qualification Submissions due TxDOT Aviation Apr – Committee to Review Consultant Qualifications • John Pettitt • Donna Courtney • Mike Babin • Jordon Maddox • Russ Volk May 9 – Selection Committee scheduled to meet to tabulate scoring of consultants Jun/Jul 2016 – TxDOT in negotiations with consultant over scope of work and fees Page 19 of 164 Sep/Oct/Nov – Selection of Members for Master Plan Steering Committee Dec 6, 2016 – Kickoff Meeting with Steering Committee and Consultant Feb 2, 2017 – 2nd Meeting with Planning Advisory Committee and Consultant as well as Public Open House Mar, 2017 – Documents available for public comments Apr, 2017 – Documents available for public comments May, 2017 – Documents available for public comments Jun 6, 2017 – 3rd Meeting with Planning Advisory Committee and Consultant from 2 – 4 PM followed by a Public Open House from 5:30 to 7 PM. Jul, 2017 – Documents available for public comments Page 20 of 164 Georgetown Municipal Airport Contract Tower Program Update Operations for Month of May 2017 Project Description Georgetown Tower Monthly Update Purpose Operations Report Project Manager Russ Volk C.M., Airport Manager Operating Statistics Performance/volumetric indicators For the Month of: May May 2016 FY-T-D May 2017 FY-T-D Variance Take Offs and Landings 2016 2017 IFR 870 754 5,713 6,073 360 6% VFR 8,015 8,242 52,640 59,305 6,665 11% Total Take Offs/Landings 8,885 8,996 58,353 65,378 7,025 11% *This does not include flyover operations (i.e. handoffs from ABIA approach/departure control to KGTU tower then onto the next ATC. Page 21 of 164 Georgetown Municipal Airport Fuel Sales Update For Month of May 2017 Project Description Georgetown Fuel Sales Update Purpose Fuel Sales Monthly Report Project Manager Russ Volk C.M., Airport Manager Operating Statistics Performance/volumetric indicators Gallons For the Month of: May May 2016 FY-T-D May 2017 FY-T-D Variance Type of Fuel 2016 2017 AVGAS 23,511 24,011 195,508 200,180 4,672 2% JET A 35,247 44,452 300,324 386,244 85,920 22% Total Gallons Sold 58,758 68,463 495,832 586,424 90,592 16% Page 22 of 164 Airport Hangar / Tie-Down Lease Update Jun 2017 Project Description Hangar / Tie-Down Lease Agreements Purpose Occupancy Rates Project Manager Russ Volk C.M., Airport Manager Unit Stats Total Hangars – 135 • 100 Percent Occupied Total Storage Units – 11 • 4 Occupied • 7 Vacant Total Tie-Downs – 38 Monthly, 11 for Overnight/Transient Parking • 100 Percent Occupied Page 23 of 164 GTU Airport In-Work Projects Replace bottom door seals on Hangars H, I, and J. Over 1/2 complete Develop Airport Preventative Maintenance Program. Planned Projects Obtaining Pesticide Application License to allow for airport staff to spray state regulated chemicals. Develop Hangar Routine Maintenance Program. Evaluate possible software solutions for a technology based Pavement Management Program. Evaluate possible software solutions for a technology based Airport Self Inspection Program. Repairs to terminal ramp to reduce FOD issues. Upgrade to bi-fold doors drive motors on Hangars BB and CC. Developing lease agreement for storage locations. Page 24 of 164 Accomplishments 2017 Roof repairs to Central Texas Avionics roof Installation of electronic gate at Genesis Hangar Updated Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Replaced tower controller parking signs Windsock annual maintenance Electronic gate quarterly maintenance Runway 18 PAPI quarterly maintenance FBO fuel truck quarterly inspections Replaced 12 obstruction lights on lights poles along Lakeway Drive Replaced 2 HVAC below window units in Control Tower Replaced 9 street lights Replaced Tower Obstruction Lights Replaced Tower carpet Completed a TxDOT Aviation Safety and Compliance Inspection of Airport Underground Storage Tank removed at old Gantt Hangars New Airport Fuel Storage System placed in operation New Business Operations Software placed in service Removed 11 abandoned telephone poles Crack sealed and seal coated Taxiway J Crack sealed and seal coated Taxiway K Crack sealed and seal coated Taxiway M Page 25 of 164 Crack sealed and seal coated access route to Genesis Hangar Seal coated shoulders of Runway 11/29 Installed new electronic gate at entrance to Terminal Apron from Terminal Parking Lot Executed new leases for Tower T-Hangar tenants Rekeyed Tower T-Hangar door to the City key system Added full time Airport Maintenance person Electrical upgrade to Hangar J Electrical upgrade to Hangar I Crack sealed and seal coated Taxiway E Old AvGas Underground Tank removed from Airport Old Jet A Underground Tank removed from Airport Construction of new Taxiway F Construction of new Taxiway E Construction of new Taxiway C Widening of Taxiway J Installation of edge reflectors along all Taxiways Implemented new Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasures Plan Painted Airport Business Coordinators Office and Terminal Restrooms Replaced furniture in Airport Business Coordinators Office Installed new Taxiway Navigation signs Removed old chain link fence from north side of Terminal Drive Installed fuel hose retract speed controller on self-serve pump #1 Crack sealed and seal coated East Apron Page 26 of 164 Painted new Compass Rose on East Apron Page 27 of 164 6/29/2017 AirNav: Fuel prices near Georgetown, TX 78628 http://airnav.com/fuel/local.html 1/3 1545 users online 100LL Avgas prices within 50 miles of Georgetown, TX 78628 Airport / FBO 100LL $3.40—$6.70 average $4.36 KGTU 2 ENE Georgetown Municipal Airport Georgetown, TX, USA FS $4.75 $4.65 GUARANTEED City of Georgetown Terminal SS $3.40 26-Jun update AeroJet Center FS $4.75 GUARANTEED T74 15 ESE Taylor Municipal Airport Taylor, TX, USA Taylor Municipal Airport Avfuel SS $3.45 19-Jun update KRYW 17 SW Lago Vista TX - Rusty Allen Airport Lago Vista, TX, USA Lago Vista Airport SS $3.95 04-Apr update KEDC 18 SSE Austin Executive Airport Austin, TX, USA FS $5.50 27-Jun update 3R9 24 SW Lakeway Airpark Lakeway, TX, USA Lakeway Airpark SS $3.89 26-Jun update KILE 25 N Skylark Field Airport Killeen, TX, USA Flight Line Services SS $3.55 26-Jun Airports Navaids Airspace Fixes Aviation Fuel iPhone App My AirNav Page 28 of 164 6/29/2017 AirNav: Fuel prices near Georgetown, TX 78628 http://airnav.com/fuel/local.html 2/3 update KBMQ 28 W Burnet Municipal Airport-Kate Craddock Field Burnet, TX, USA Faulkner's Air Shop Avfuel FS $3.75 26-Jun update KAUS 28 S Austin-Bergstrom International Airport Austin, TX, USA FS $6.70 GUARANTEED FS $6.45 29-Jun update KTPL 33 NNE Draughon-Miller Central Texas Regional Airport Temple, TX, USA General Aviation Terminal SS $3.54 FS $3.94 GUARANTEED KDZB 35 WSW Horseshoe Bay Resort Airport Horseshoe Bay, TX, USA Horseshoe Bay Resort Jet Center FS $6.24 19-Jun update KLZZ 37 NW Lampasas Airport Lampasas, TX, USA City of Lampasas (FBO) SS $3.40 GUARANTEED KRCK 37 E H H Coffield Regional Airport Rockdale, TX, USA City of Rockdale AS $3.89 19-Jun update T35 40 ENE Cameron Municipal Airpark Cameron, TX, USA City of Cameron SS $3.69 GUARANTEED KGOP 46 N Gatesville Municipal Airport Gatesville, TX, USA City of Gatesville independent SS $3.80 26-Oct-2016 update KHYI 47 S San Marcos Regional Airport Austin, TX, USA SS $3.81 FS $4.89 20-Jun update Page 29 of 164 6/29/2017 AirNav: Fuel prices near Georgetown, TX 78628 http://airnav.com/fuel/local.html 3/3 FS $5.13 $5.03 GUARANTEED 84R 47 SE Smithville Crawford Municipal Airport Smithville, TX, USA Fayette Aero LLC Avfuel SS $4.30 19-Jun update KGYB 48 SE Giddings-Lee County Airport Giddings, TX, USA Sills Aviation Services LLC independent SS $4.15 26-Jun update 50R 49 S Lockhart Municipal Airport Lockhart, TX, USA Martin & Martin Aviation Avfuel SS $4.50 28-Jun update KAQO 50 W Llano Municipal Airport Llano, TX, USA City of Llano Avfuel SS $3.65 26-Jun update Copyright © AirNav, LLC. All rights reserved.Privacy Policy Contact Page 30 of 164 6/29/2017 AirNav: Fuel prices near Georgetown, TX 78628 http://airnav.com/fuel/local.html 1/2 1542 users online Jet A prices within 50 miles of Georgetown, TX 78628 Airport / FBO Jet A $2.68—$6.89 average $4.10 KGTU 2 ENE Georgetown Municipal Airport Georgetown, TX, USA FS $3.95 $3.85 GUARANTEED AeroJet Center FS $3.95 GUARANTEED T74 15 ESE Taylor Municipal Airport Taylor, TX, USA Taylor Municipal Airport Avfuel SS $2.85 19-Jun update KEDC 18 SSE Austin Executive Airport Austin, TX, USA FS $5.60 27-Jun update KGRK 25 NNW Robert Gray Army Airfield Fort Hood (Killeen), TX, USA Killeen-Fort Hood Regional Airport FS $3.35 25-May-2016 update KILE 25 N Skylark Field Airport Killeen, TX, USA Flight Line Services SS $3.30 FS $3.55 26-Jun update KBMQ 28 W Burnet Municipal Airport-Kate Craddock Field Burnet, TX, USA Faulkner's Air Shop Avfuel FS $3.35 26-Jun update Austin-Bergstrom International Airport Austin, TX, USA Airports Navaids Airspace Fixes Aviation Fuel iPhone App My AirNav Page 31 of 164 6/29/2017 AirNav: Fuel prices near Georgetown, TX 78628 http://airnav.com/fuel/local.html 2/2 KAUS 28 S FS $6.886 GUARANTEED FS $6.55 29-Jun update KTPL 33 NNE Draughon-Miller Central Texas Regional Airport Temple, TX, USA General Aviation Terminal SS $3.75 FS $4.13 GUARANTEED KDZB 35 WSW Horseshoe Bay Resort Airport Horseshoe Bay, TX, USA Horseshoe Bay Resort Jet Center FS $5.49 19-Jun update T35 40 ENE Cameron Municipal Airpark Cameron, TX, USA City of Cameron SS $2.68 GUARANTEED KHYI 47 S San Marcos Regional Airport Austin, TX, USA FS $3.90 20-Jun update FS $3.99 $3.89 GUARANTEED KGYB 48 SE Giddings-Lee County Airport Giddings, TX, USA Sills Aviation Services LLC independent SS $3.50 26-Jun update KAQO 50 W Llano Municipal Airport Llano, TX, USA City of Llano Avfuel FS $3.05 26-Jun update Copyright © AirNav, LLC. All rights reserved.Privacy Policy Contact Page 32 of 164 Page 33 of 164 Page 34 of 164 Page 35 of 164 Page 36 of 164 YEAR-END YEAR-END APPROVED JUN-17 YEAR TO DATE YEAR-END VARIANCE % VARIANCE BUDGET W/ENCUMB W/ENCUMB PROJECTION FAV(UNFAV) FAV(UNFAV) BEGINNING BALANCE 43,849$ 311,251$ 267,402$ 609.8% OPERATING REVENUE Fuel and Terminal Sales 2,720,928 294,738 1,841,420 2,561,492 (159,436) (5.9%) Leases and Rentals 767,990 72,990 615,280 872,054 104,064 13.6% Interest and Other 66,075 2,929 33,644 50,554 (15,521) (23.5%) Total Operating Revenue 3,554,993 370,657 2,490,344 3,484,100 (70,893) (2.0%) OPERATING EXPENDITURES Personnel 388,781 40,489 236,387 358,048 30,733 7.9% Operations-Fuel 2,296,928 0 2,201,128 2,200,414 96,514 4.2% Operations-Non Fuel 657,086 58,885 492,759 666,386 (9,300) (1.4%) Transfers Out 25,000 0 0 25,000 - 0.0% Debt Service 143,768 0 20,462 143,768 - 0.0% Total Operating Expenditures 3,511,563 99,374 2,950,736 3,393,616 117,947 3.4% TOTAL NET OPERATIONS 43,430 271,283 (460,392) 90,484 47,054 108.3% NON-OPERATING REVENUE Grants 35,000 5,684 50,000 50,000 15,000 42.9% Total Non-Operating Revenue 35,000 5,684 50,000 50,000 - 0.0% NON-OPERATING EXPENDITURES Airport Master Plan 0 318 318 318 (318) NA Total Non-Operating Expenditures 0 318 318 318 (318) NA TOTAL NET NON-OPERATIONS 35,000 5,366 49,682 49,682 (318) (0.9%) EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF TOTAL REVENUE OVER TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 78,430$ 276,649$ (410,710)$ 140,166$ 61,736$ 78.7% ENDING BALANCE 122,279$ 451,417$ 329,138 269.2% Airport Operations Fund Year End Projection to Approved Budget as of June 2017 Page 37 of 164 City of Georgetown, Texas Transportation Advisory Board July 14, 2017 SUBJECT: Review and pos s ible actio n to ap p ro ve the minutes fro m the regular GTAB Bo ard meeting held on June 9, 2017. - Cindy Alejandro – GTAB Board Liais o n ITEM SUMMARY: Bo ard to review and revis e and /or ap p ro ve the minutes fro m the regular meeting held o n June 9, 2017. FINANCIAL IMPACT: N/A SUBMITTED BY: Cind y Alejand ro ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Draft Minutes Backup Material Page 38 of 164 Minutes of the Meeting of the Georgetown Transportation Advisory Board and the Governing Body of the City of Georgetown, Texas June 9, 2017 The City of Georgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If you require assistance in participation at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the ADA, reasonable assistance, adaptations, or accommodations will be provided upon request. Please contact the City at least four (4) days prior to the scheduled meeting date, at (512)930-3652 or City Hall at 113 East 8th Street for additional information: TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. Board Members: Steve Johnston – Chair, Ron Bindas – Vice Chair, Donna Courtney – Secretary, Mark Allen, Troy Hellmann, John Marler, John Hesser and Sheila Mills Board Members Absent: Doug Noble Staff Present: Jim Briggs, Wesley Wright, Ed Polasek, Michael Hallmark, Mike Babin, Cindy Alejandro, Mark Miller, Andreina Dávila-Quintero, Nathaniel Waggoner, Tristan Whitmire Others Present: Trae Sutton – KPA, Carl Norris, Dennis Hegeberth, Alyson Demaio, Wendy Dew, John Milford, Lori Ford – ACC, Lucia McClain, Dave Lukas – Aguirre and Fields, Erin Gray Regular Session A. Call to Order: Mr. Johnston called the regular GTAB Board Meeting to order on Friday, June 9, 2017 at 10:01 AM Georgetown Transportation Advisory Board may, at any time, recess the Regular Session to convene an Executive Session at the request of the Chair, a Board Member, The City Manager, Assistant City Manager, General Manager of Utilities, City Council Member, or legal counsel for any purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code Chapter 551, and are subject to action in the Regular Session that follows. B. Introduction of Visitors C Industry/CAMPO/TxDOT Updates - Ed Polasek, AICP, Transportation Planning Coordinator TXDOT has submitted their ten year unified planning work program which included the I-35 frontage road from Williams Drive to Lakeway and the DB Woods and SH 29 intersection improvements for the first time. D June 2017 Project Updates - Wesley Wright, P.E., Systems Engineering Director/Michael Hallmark, CIP Manager Mrs. Demaio spoke on this item. E Discussion regarding the Airport Monthly Report and Project Time Lines. – Russ Volk, C.M., Airport Manager and Octavio A. Garza, P.E, C.P.M., Public Works Director Mr. Norris and Ms. Dew spoke on this item. Both of their comments are at the end of these minutes. Page 39 of 164 F Presentation and discussion of Austin Ave Bridges Public Meeting #3 and Environmental Clearance process – Ed Polasek, AICP, Transportation Planning Coordinator Mr. Polasek gave a presentation on this item. Legislative Regular Agenda The Board will individually consider and possibly take action on any or all of the following items: G Review and possible action to approve the minutes from the regular GTAB Board meeting held on May 12, 2017. - Cindy Alejandro – GTAB Board Liaison Motion by Marler second by Hellmann to approve the minutes as presented. Approved 8-0-1 (Noble absent) H Consideration and possible recommendation to approve a contract with Cholla Pavement Maintenance, Inc. of Apache Junction, Arizona for 2017 Two Course Surface Treatment with Fog in the amount of $1,066,087.50 – Wesley Wright, P.E., Systems Engineering Director/Michael Hallmark, CIP Manager. Motion by Hellmann second by Marler to approve a contract with Cholla Pavement Maintenance, Inc. of Apache Junction, Arizona for 2017 Two Course Surface Treatment with Fog in the amount of $1,066,087.50 Approved 8-0-1 (Noble absent) I Consideration and possible recommendation to approve a contract with Cutler Repaving, Inc. of Lawrence, Kansas for 2017 Street Maintenance (Hot in Place Recycling) in the amount of $1,060,008.35 – Wesley Wright, P.E., Systems Engineering Director/Michael Hallmark, CIP Manager. Motion by Courtney second by Bindas to approve a contract with Cutler Repaving, Inc. of Lawrence, Kansas for 2017 Street Maintenance (Hot in Place Recycling) in the amount of $1,060,008.35 Approved 8-0-1 (Noble absent) J Presentation, discussion and possible recommendation to City Council for acceptance of the CAMPO/City of Georgetown Williams Drive Study Final Plan – Nathaniel Waggoner, AICP, PMP, Transportation Analyst, and Andreina Dávila-Quintero, Project Coordinator Motion by Marler second by Hellmann for the acceptance of the Williams Drive Study and short-term implementation plan, with a further recommendation that the City Council review the recommended mid-term and long-term projects prior to adoption Approved 5-3-1 (Bindas, Hesser and Johnson oppose, Noble absent) Page 40 of 164 Adjournment Motion by Johnston second by Hellmann to adjourn meeting Approved 8-0-1 (Noble absent) Meeting adjourned at 12:02 PM Approved: Attested: _______________________ ______________________ Steve Johnston – Chair Donna Courtney – Secretary _________________________________ Cindy Alejandro – GTAB Board Liaison Page 41 of 164 GTAB STATEMENT JUNE 09, 2017 AGENDA ITEM "E" AIRPORT MONTHLY REPORT AND PROJECT TIME LINES Good morning Mr. Chairman, members of the Georgetown Transportation Advisory Board, city staff and ladies and gentlemen. My name is Hugh C. Norris, Jr. I am a member of the Airport Concerned Citizens (ACC). ACC members have since January 2014 made multiple public statements to the city council and/or the GTAB demanding compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) regarding federal funding and fiscal transparency for the Georgetown Municipal Airport (GTU). The GTU is a documented health and safety hazard and subject of public controversy and any action for maintenance and/or expansio n should be addressed through preparation of a NEPA provided Env ironm ental Impact Statement (EIS). My comments this morning relate to Item "E" of the agenda and address a more personal issue associated with the GTU, NEPA and the EIS preparation proces s. It has come to my attention that an old blatant and totally unfounded lie concerning me, personally, remains in active circulation within city and other public officials. The lie is that I personally desire to close the GTU and, in some extensions of the lie, that the desire drives my influence with the ACC. Nothing could be farther from the truth. Unfortunately, not only has the lie come to me directly from city officials, but it has circulated in state and federal offices even to the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) in the Executive Office of the President in Washington, D.C . At every tum and instance where I have encountered the lie I have rebuked it as such and countered that it is an example of scoundrel behavior of those unwilling to publicly debate what for them is an uncomfortable issue and instead attack a proponent of that issue. This unsavory behavior is not new and is a time worn practice of bullies to demean and marginalize individuals to shut them up and drive them away. My early experiences with this lie began with my letter and statement dated January 14, 2014 to the mayor and city council, statement to GTAB dated February 14, 2014, statement to city council dated March 25, 2014, and GTAB statement dated April 11, 2014. I request these documents be added as attachments to this statement for official minutes of this meeting. Let me be very clear. It has never been my desire or goal to see this city denied a quality, regional, reliever airport. I totally support that need for the long term economic prosperity of our community. I totally object to the location of the GTU being in the heavily developed heart of our growing city and totally atop the Edwards Recharge Zone. If a new airport were being considered no one in their right mind would select the GTU's location . I totally support the intent of the Congress with its passage of the NEPA that the citizens of a community receiving federal funds have every right through proper hearing processes to consider the social, economic and environmental impacts of any proposed federal funded action, mitigation for elimination or reduction of adverse impacts and examination and evaluation of all practicable alternatives to the proposed action. The Congress further established the CEQ to aid federal funding agencies in carrying out the law and oversee its application. With CEQ oversight, agencies have developed NEPA compliance regulations establishing the EIS preparation process. Without an EIS for a single GTU federal grant in the past 37 years of such funding , I and others have demonstrated that NEPA compliance does not exist for GTU funding. Page 42 of 164 There exist a number of alternatives to continued state and/or federal funding for GTU expansion of aviation operations. I personally believe that the best alternative was included in the non-professional October 2002 Airport Closing Project report by the old Airport Advisory Board that the GTU's aviation operations should be relocated to a superior, rural site using the combined interests of the State Legislature and the city. The real estate value of the GTU site is over $100 Million. Conversion of the GTU to its highest and best real estate use would generate ad valorum and sales taxes to the city's treasury in perpetuity. What is needed is a professional developed feasibility study showing how such a Mueller to Bergstrom seamless relocation could , in fact, be accomplished. The ACC has made past presentations on this issue and the GTAB has the responsib ility to recommend this action to the city council. Hopefully, my personal desires and positions regarding the GTU are clear. Mr. Chairman, I welcome any questions or comments. Page 43 of 164 January 14, 2014 Honorable George Garver Mayor, City of Georgetown and City Council Members 101 E. 7th Street Georgetown, Texas 78628 Subject: City Council Meeting Agenda Item I Request for Public Participation Process Georgetown Municipal Airport Capital Improvements Program Dear Mayor Garver and City Council Members, This is a request to pull Item I from tonight's meeting agenda and place it and all other components of the Georgetown Municipal Airport Capital Improvements Plan in abeyance pending completion of a public participation process through a series of public meetings to determine a public consensus regarding this important capital improvements program. The airport capital improvements program has never been publicly vetted to determine its approval by our citizens. It has flown below the public radar and remained virtually unknown to the general public because it is not a bond program. 90% funding for this program is provided by federal funds administered through the Federal Aviation Administration and locally managed and executed by the Aviation Division of the Texas Department of Transportation. The remaining 10% of funding is provided by the city. Since the program is not a bond funded program such as those for schools or their improvements, public libraries, parks, roads or bridges there have been no public discussion in local publications, no opposing or opposition discussions or articles, no pro or con ad signs, and no public election votes. When approached for the official rationale for this capital improvements program it is described as only for general repairs, safety and maintenance to support existing air operations. Yet when the program is examined in detail of its over $7 million dollars of current funding being poured into the site, it has all the appearances of construction of a sound, substantial 24 hour operating facility for a vastly expanded number of aircraft and operational capability. This assessment is strengthened by review of the recently completed Georgetown Municipal Airport Business Case Analysis by CH2MHill Engineers, Inc. which describes a solution to the airport's fiscal problems by growing out of its current restraints by increased fuel sales, hanger rentals, tie-down fees, and new land leases.and other improvements. The existing airport is in the wrong location. It is in the heart of the expanding population and land use of the city. We need a fully functional airport for general aviation and business purposes. But, having an expanding aviation industrial center in the heart of our future city is not the highest and best use of the airport's 640 acres. Page 44 of 164 Therefore, it is respectfully requested that the City Council place the airport's capital improvement program on hold pending the outcome of a public participation program wherein, through a series of public hearings, the general public can come to a consensus on the future of this citizen owned facility. Attached hereto are documents provided for your review and consideration which provide more detail regarding this request and offer suggestions for airport alternatives and guidelines for special studies. Respectfully Submitted, Hugh C. Norris , Jr. CC: Mr.Paul Brandenburg, City Manager Mr. David Fulton, Director, Aviation Division , Texas Department of Transportation Attachments: Comments -Proposed Improvements Georgetown Municipal Airport (GTU) Evaluation Factors - Georgetown Municipal Airport (GTU) Capital Improvements Program (CIP) Alternative Concept -For Georgetown Municipal Airport Guidelines -Georgetown Municipal Airport (GTU) Capital Improvem ents Program (CIP) Public Participation Process (PPP) Page 45 of 164 STATEMENT TO CITY COUNCIL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY,JANUARY 14, 2014 Mr.Mayor, members of the City Council, Mr.City Manager, members of the city staff and ladies and gentlemen. My name is Hugh Carlton Norris, Jr.My wife, Nancy, and I have lived for the past 15 years at 4400 Luna Trail in Serenada Estates. I come here tonight as a representative of a group of an ever growing number of concerned citizens to deliver a letter with attachments to our city council requesting you to pull agenda item ''I"from the agenda for further discussions and consideration. The letter also requests that item "I" which is an invoice from the Aviation Division of the Texas Department of Transportation (or TxDOT Aviation) in the amount of $87,500 to cover the city's increased cost share for the doubling of estimated costs for land acquisition including condemnation relative to runway 11/29 at the Georgetown Municipal Airport from its original estimate of over $400,000 to a new estimate of over $900,000 be held in abeyance along with all other components of the 20 year airport capital improvements plan program pending outcome of a public participation process concluding with a citizen consensus on the program. The 20 year airport capital improvements program as described in the 2005 Master Plan Update by GRW Willis, Inc. and the August 2013 Georgetown Municipal Airport Business Case Analysis by CH2MHill Engineers has never been vetted by the general public for acceptance. The reason is that it is not a bond program. It's cost is split by 10°/o local city share and 90% federal funds as sourced through the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) as managed and executed by TxDOT Aviation. If the airport program were a bond program such a new school, school improvements, new library, public park, new bridge or roadway or any other public bond funded improvement it would be exposed to numerous reviews in publications, interviews between opponents and proponents, yard and roadway signs and finally a public election to determine public approval or denial. The portion of the airport's current 20 year improvement program included in the current TxDOT Aviation 2014/2015 capital improvements program has had no public exposure, review, or acceptance. The airport has been the property of the citizens of this city for over 70 years and its current 20 year plan will have more of a permanent and profound impact on the future long term safety and environmental status of this city than any other capital improvements program of this generation. A properly vetted program would determine whether the program is acceptable or whether alternatives including possible relocation of the airport are preferred by the airport's citizen owners. This group of concerned citizens I mentioned strongly supports a viable municipal airport for our community and its economy both for private, recreation and business needs. But our city and county are rapidly growing.A child born today who lives to my age will see a completely different city when he or she becomes my age. By then Georgetown may be the size of Akron, Ohio. Because of increasing use of aviation services by business it is probable that aviation services will will grow at a faster rate than the population growth curve for the general population. Ifwe Page 46 of 164 consider no changes to the airport our future city will have a surging 640 acre aviation industrial complex existing inits geographic heart. It is highly questionable that such a future is the highest and best use for the citizen owned 640 acres currently occupied by the airport. We have no problem with TxDOT Aviation which ranks our airport as a highly ranked Reliever Airport and has responded to requests from the city as an official sponsor requesting its authorized financial assistance. Regardless of the outcome of a citizen consensus on the airport program we encourage coordination, respect and compliance with that agency and its FAA oversight. Our city will need their continued assistance. Regarding the requested public participation process, it is requested it be conducted in full compliance with applicable National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and FAA rules and regulations. For that reason it should not be a burden other than oversight placed on the city staff already fully loaded with assigned tasks. Rather, it should be performed by a contracte4 consulting firm with demonstrated expertise in planning, conduct and completion to public consensus status of federal funded projects having long term public impacts. Toward that end, we have attached to our reference letter several attachments which will serve as requested guidance. Thank you one and all for providing an opportunity for this presentation. Page 47 of 164 REQUEST TO GEORGETOWN TRAFFIC ADVISIORY BOARD (GTAB) FEBRUARY 14, 2014 Mr. Chairman, members of the board of the Georgetown Traffic Advisory Board, city staff, ladies and gentlemen. My name is Hugh Carlton Norris, Jr.My wife,Nancy, and I have lived for the past 15 years at 4400 Luna Trail in Serenada Estates. I appear before you today as a representative of the Airport Concerned Citizens (ACC), a group of an ever growing number of concerned citizens opposed to the city's plans to expand aviation operations at the Georgetown Municipal Airport (GTU). The ACC requests that all components of the city's 20 year airport capital improvements plan program as described in the 2005 Master Plan Update and included in the business analysis study by CH2MHIU Engineers, and as may be amended by the pending GTU master plan update be held in abeyance pending outcome of a public participation process concluding with a citizen consensus on the program. It is our understanding that staff was requested by the City Council to implement portions of the 2005 Master Plan Update and the business analysis study with no qualifications for removal or deletion of any projects contained therein. Nor,were any instructions issued to staff to implement only sufficient projects for safety and maintenance service to support the existing 286 aircraft based at the airport, the 19 private businesses and 15 private leases thereon. With no official documentation to the contrary, implementation instructions to staff are understood to implement all components of the 20 year program. Itis our understanding that the funding program of the Texas Department of Transportation Aviation Division (TxDOT CIP) in support of the airport currently contains 17 projects. Three of these contracts being the revised land acquisition with condemnation approved by City Council on January 14, 2014, a design contract with Garver Engineering, a GTU master plan update and 14 "elements" included in the 2014 and 2015 TxDOT CIP.The 20 year plan contained in both the above described engineering studies contains an additional 48 projects. With no official documentation to the contrary we understand that the remaining 48 projects will be implemented by staff as quickly as funding assistance from TxDOT becomes available. The 20 year airport capital improvements program as described in the 2005 Master Plan Update by GRW Willis, Inc. and incorporated in the August 2013 Georgetown Municipal Airport Business Case Analysis by CH2MHill Engineers has never been vetted by the general public for acceptance. The apparent reason for such non-vetting being that it is not a bond program. It's cost is split by 10°/o local city share and 90% federal funds as sourced through the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) as managed and executed by TxDOT Ifthe airport program were a bond program such a new school, school improvements, new library, public park, new bridge or roadway or any other public bond funded improvement it would be exposed to numerous reviews in publications, interviews between opponents and proponents, yard and roadway signs and finally a public election to determine ·public approval or denial. None of the entire 20 year program contained in the two engineering docments or the portion of that program included in the current TxDOT 2014/2015 capital improvements program has had public exposure, review, or acceptance. The airport has been the property of the citizens of this city for over 70 years and its current 20 year plan will have more of a permanent and profound impact on the future long term safety and Page 48 of 164 environmental status of this city than any other capital improvements program of this generation. A properly vetted program would determine whether the program is acceptable or whether alternatives including possible relocation of the airport are preferred by the airport's citizen owners. The ACC strongly supports a viable municipal airport for our community and its economy both for private, recreation and business needs. But our city and county are rapidly growing. A child born today who lives to my age will see a completely different city when he or she becomes my age.By then Georgetown may be the size of Akron, Ohio. Because of increasing use of aviation services by business it is probable that aviation services will will grow at a faster rate than the population growth curve for the general population. Ifwe consider no changes to the airport our future city will have a surging 640 acre aviation industrial complex existing in its geographic and cultural heart. Itis highly questionable that such a future is the highest and best use for the citizen owned 640 acres currently occupied by the airport. We have no problem with TxDOT which ranks our airport as a highly ranked Reliever Airport and has responded to requests from the city as an official sponsor requesting its authorized financial assistance. Regardless of the outcome of a citizen consensus on the airport program we encourage coordination, respect and compliance with that agency and its FAA oversight. Our city will need their continued assistance. Regarding the requested public participation process, it is requested it be conducted in full compliance with applicable National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) and FAA rules and regulations.For that reason it should not be a burden other than oversight placed on the city staff already fully loaded with assigned tasks. Rather, it should be performed by a contracted consulting firm with demonstrated expertise in planning, conduct and completion to public consensus status of federal funded projects having long term public impacts.The ACC has qualified personnel with experience in selection and contract negotiation with consultants and desires to participate with city staff in the process for selection and oversight of the work. Toward that end, we have attached a set of suggested guidelines for such a process as an attachment to this presentation. We would look forward to working with you in final development and execution of that process. Thank you one and all for providing an opportunity for this request presentation. Page 49 of 164 STATEMENT TO CITY COUNCIL CITY COUNCIL MEETING. TUESDAY, MARCH 25, 2014 Mr.Mayor, members of the City Council , Mr.City Manager,members of the city staff and ladies and gentlemen. My name is Hugh Carlton Norris, Jr.My wife and I have lived at 4400 Luna Trail, for the past 15 years. I come before you tonight as a representative of the Airport Concerned Citizens (ACC) to request that item "S" on tonight's agenda be pulled for further consideration and returned to the Georgetown Transportation Advisory Board (GTAB) not for further discussion, but for full implementation of the requests made in my presentation to you on the meeting of the City Council on January 14, 2014. That request made no inference or mention of any actions related to "closure I relocation of the airport",but rather was a specific request that the funding for the agenda item specifically identified in that statement "be held in abeyance along with all other components of the 20 year airport capital improvements plan pending outcome of a public participation process concluding with a citizens consensus on the program". The statement also contained a final paragraph describing how the consensus should be attained for the purpose of being conducted by a professional consultant free from bias and charged with the duty of attaining a true citizens consensus of the airport program. The master planning and methodical construction of the city airport has been carefully and quietly accomplished by a small group of the city's population who have treated the airport and its property as their own for over the past 70 years and continue to this day. Inthe ACC opinion this has been done steadily, methodically, and hidden from the view of the general public in order to create what is endorsed by the FAA and TxDOT as a needed regional Central Texas Reliever Airport (CTRA) and do it inthe very center of our growing city. The work of this small, but highly effective group continues to be very effective at shielding airport activities from the general public.Read the city's own ordinances on Noise and Nuisance- not a single reference to noise or offensive impacts from the airport -not even in the Exceptions. Read the city's 2030 Comprehensive Plan- only vague, benign references to the airport and no mention that it is designated a Planned Unit Development, zoned Industrial and located atop the Edwards Recharge Zone. Search the Airport under the city departments - one can locate the current 2005 Master Plan Update, but no overview information is provided on the the plan's role of providing the services of a CTRA. Apparently, the mere thought of a citizens consensus on the future of what and where their airport should be chills the airport program supporters to the bone. The GTAB recommendation to be presented to you tonight by Mr.Ed Polasek and perhaps others of the city staff was conceived behind closed doors, without public participation or prior GTAB discussions with the public including the ACC and was a surprise appear.mce on the GTAB March agenda. Further, it was premised on fabrications, and misstatements cited by Mr. Polasek as based on my January 14, 2014 statement to Council in which he was in attendance.He was also present at a similar request I made to the GTAB meeting on February 14, 2014 wherein I made exactly the same requests in the same wording for a public consensus on the airport program. There is no justification for any misunderstandings of my request. Page 50 of 164 The GTAB at its March 14, 2014 meeting relied upon misrepresentations of my earlier comments and acted upon those. I at no time recommended "closure I relocation" of the Georgetown Airport. I requested a "public consensus on the airport program".The presentation and resultant action by the GTAB do a great disservice to both the City Council and the citizens of Georgetown. Citizens of this city have virtually no knowledge of the extent and long range permanent impacts of the airport's capital improvements program on the future of our city.Ifyou believe that our citizens have a comprehensive understanding of the airport program including its effects on the safety, environmental, health and cultural impacts on the city you would be misinformed. I challenge you to verify your opinion! Go out anywhere on the streets of Georgetown and query citizens on airport issues having long range, permanent impacts on the city.I dare say you will get "blank stares". Further, the ACC intends to hold the City of Georgetown to strict compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) related to Federal grants and any airport construction by the City, especially compliance with the Comprehensive Environmental Response and Liability Act (CERCLA),which addresses past discharges of hazardous materials on airport property affecting groundwater. Without repeating the second paragraph of this statement you are respectfully requested to pull Item "S" and send it back to the GTAB for full implementation of the entire request statement. Thank you for this opportunity to make this statement. Page 51 of 164 · Coversheet City of Georgetown, Texas City Council Agenda March 25, 2014 SUBJECT: Forwarded from the Georgetown Transportation Advisory Board (GTAB): Consi deration and possible action regarding operational options for the Georgetown Municipal Airport -- Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Transportation Services Director, Curtis Benkendorfer, Interim Airport Manager, Bridget Chapman, City Attorney, and Hamilton Rial, Airport Counsel. ITEM SUMMARY: At the January 14, 2014, City Council Meeting, Council heard a speaker and received a Jetter related to the possible closure/relocation of the Georgetown Airport. The Council asked staff to take the item back to GTAB for consideration as part of the implementation process of the Airport Business Case Analysis. Attached you will find the Resolution creating the Georgetown Municipal Airport, a 2002 Report on the possible closure relocation of the Georgetown Municipal Airport and an updated grant history for the Georgetown Municipal Airport. In 2002, th e thought of closing or relocating the Airport would be between $30 to $50 Million dollars, and would not be supported or approved by the TxDOT and the FAA. Today, TxDOT and the FAA still would not support the closure of the Airport, and relocation would cost the same amount of money, plus the cost of rebuilding the existing infrastructure at a new location if it could even get environmental clearances. Also, in most cases of airport closures, property purchased for the existing GTIJ will belong to the Federal Government, not the City of Georgetown, for redevelopment. GTAB BOARD RECOMMENDATION: Motion from the GTAB Board was for staff to continue with implementation of the Airport Business Analysis for the orderly management of the Georgetown Municipal Airport through recommendations mad e by GTAB to City Council. And was unanimously approved at the March 14, 2014 GTAB Board Meeting. S TAFF RECOMMENDATION : Continue with implementation of the Airport Business Analysis for the orderly management of the Georgetown Municipal Airport. FINANCIAL IMPACT : SUBMITTED BY: EGP ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Creating Airport 2002 Closure Report Updated Grant History for GTU Execut ive Summa1y GTU - ES Appendix A GTU - ES Apoend ix B http://agendas. georgetown.org/Bluesheet.aspx?ItemID=6209&MeetingID =631 6/7/2017 Page 52 of 164 STATEMENT TO GTAB APRIL 11,2014 Mr.Chairman, GTAB members, city staff, ladies and gentlemen.My name is Hugh Carlton Norris, Jr. My wife and I have lived at 4400 Luna Trail for the past 15 years. I am a member of the Airport Concerned Citizens (ACC). At last month's GTAB meeting, Mr. Polasek prefaced a recommendation with "At the January 14, 2014 City Council Meeting, Council heard a speaker and received a letter related to the possible closure/ relocation of the Georgetown Airport." Upon that preface, GTAB approved and sent to the March 25, 2014 City Council Meeting Agenda Item "S" a recommendation of "Continue with implementation of the Airport Business Analysis for the orderly management of the Georgetown Municipal Airport." which was then unanimously approved by City Council. The Airport Business Analysis includes the 20 year capital improvements plan of the 2005 Master Plan Update and financial recommendations by CH2MHill Engineers. Itis a combined report and Council's approval clears the way for full implementation of all current and future airport funding authorized by FAAff xDOT. It eliminates any consideration of any alternative airport with exception of the city's current 30 year old Airport Advisory Board (AAB) plan aimed at constructing a Central Texas Regional Airport (CTRA) with full service authority for every component of passenger and air cargo general aviation except regular scheduled air passenger service and do it in the very heart of our city.All this with no concern for the damage to be unleashed on our future city and do it below the radar of public awareness with no public endorsement. You know that speaker and sender of the referenced letter was me. My statement to the Council, modified for the GTAB February meeting, was that all pending components of the airport plan be held in abeyance pending outcome of a citizen consensus on the airport program. The City Council heard me, GTAB heard me, and my statements are embedded in minutes of both public bodies. My requests to both bodies made no mention of the words "closure or relocation" nor even by inference anywhere in the body of the statement's text. Therefore, I am outraged! This misuse of my request statement can not be justified as a misstatement. This action is what it is -a cold, intentional lie done to disenfranchise me and the ACC because we had the audacity to challenge on behalf of all our citizens the ever expanding AAB - CTRA dream airport in the middle of our city. To support Mr.Polasek's lie based recommendation he dragged up 6 attachments which he and you knew to be totally irrelevant to my request and statement text.All 6 of them should be made public. Four are of historical interest. Two have special significance for public review. The Airport Project History, tracks progress of master plans from 1980 through 2005 and individual projects following each plan to methodically build the CTRA. It also hides from the public the new 20 GTU projects funded at over $9 million by TxDOT's 2013-2016 CIP including a new GTU Master Plan Update for the future. But the real problem is the "2002 Georgetown Airport Advisory Board's, Airport Closing Project, October 2002".There is no documentation of anyone proposing to "close "the airport. A phased relocation of all aviation operations to a safe and secure site outside the city,yes, but not stand alone "closing". The report's preamble alludes to problems with the then City Council of the Page 53 of 164 AAB's plan of a mid-city CTRA and consideration of an offer by a local rancher to donate at no cost to the citizens an alternate airport site outside the city. The report distorts its three examination issues: so called examination of loss of airport revenue and lease lawsuits as if such revenue and leases could be not be continued at another site; statements of FAA/TxDOT officials not approving "closure", but not describing to them phased continuation of aviation services at another site; and a non- engineering estimate of $30 to $50 million to move the airport designed to panic into submission any then or future City Council or board. Not examined by this site retention report is a host of issues including degrading community impacts, increased traffic congestion, NEPA, CERCLA, Edwards Recharge Zone problems, no evaluation of the sales value of the existing site to pay for site transition, and no mention of the perpetual flow of property and sales taxes to the city should the airport site be sold for development. The purpose of this report was to beat City Council's into submission to the AAB plan and it has been successful in that purpose to this day as evidenced by the GTAB's and City Council's cowering before it last month. This report is invalid for long term political airport decisions. Because of GTAB's lie poisoned and bogus supports for its recommendation to last month's City Council, I request a GTAB request to the April 22, 2014 Council Meeting that the Council's resultant decision regarding the before said Item "S" be revisited and voted to be made null and void. Thank you. Page 54 of 164 Wendy Dew ACC June 9-2017 30109 Spyglass Circle Georgetown Tx 78628 City/TxDot AVN Wildlife Hazard Assessment Good morning Mr. Chairman, members of he GTAB, city staff and ladies and gentlemen. My name is Wendy Dew I live at 30109 spyglass circle Georgetown Tx 78628. And I am a member of the ACC. My comments today are in regards to the Wildlife Hazard Assessment that is estimated to cost 100,000 and its probable resultant recommendation for a Wildlife Hazard Management plan (WHMP) of current unknown cost. It is reasonable to assume that with the GTU located in the planned heavily developed heart of our city and on the Edwards Recharge Zone has created numerous problems with more to come. While I and others in the ACC have no objection to completion of a Wildlife Hazard Assessment, but we do object to the city, TxDOT and FAA favoritism to study wildlife hazards to pilots but do nothing to do studies of hazards to those of us on the ground caused by aviation operations, the timing and violations of established grant requirements for this study are a concern. This study will spend time, tax payers money and expertise studying aviations hazards of deer, bugs and bunnies but the city totally neglects the citizens of this community by not mitigating health and safety hazards by aviation operations on homes, schools, churches and businesses that are all adjacent to the GTU. On the FAA fact sheet describing the Wildlife Hazard Assessment (WHA) and the Wildlife Hazard Assessment plan (WHMP) it clearly states that a WHA is necessary when there has been a “Wild life strike”. Such an incident could be cause of an emergency and issuance by the sponsor of a hazard Notice to Airmen and/or a deficiency noted on an FAA inspection report or a written recommendation or even a suggestion to the sponsor for the study. No such FAA or TxDOT documentation has been presented to the public by staff. TxDOT rules and procedures require that all state and/or federal grants must originate by a TxDOT reviewed and approved sponsor request for a specific project, be described on a TxDOT Airport Development Worksheet, and be included in a Texas Transportation Commission (TTC) prior approved Aviation Capital Improvement Program for a specified fiscal year prior to any consideration for a grant approval Minute Order by the TTC. None of these requirements have been met for this proposed taxpayer grant project. In spite of these deficiencies, TxDOT conducted a public hearing Page 55 of 164 on June 01, 2017 for approval of this project for recommendation to the TTC for a Minute Order. The Airport 2017-2018 CIP budget approved by GTAB on May 12, 2017 includes an item description of the Wildlife Hazard Assessment (WHA) and Wildlife Hazard Management Plan (WHMP) but no funding amounts are shown for any specific fiscal year. Given the lack of justification, improper timing and lack of financial planning for the Wildlife hazard Assessment (WHA) and its potential Wildlife Hazard Management Plan (WHMP) this grant project should be deferred and included in the current 20 Year (2016-2036) GTU Master Plan Update,16MPGRGTN, whereby opportunity for proper and appropriate NEPA level reviews can be provided and TxDOT rules observed. I have read the TxDOT and FAA websites, and on their websites they portray strict guidelines and procedures, especially as regards NEPA compliance and public funding procedures. However, I have witnessed them both doing everything 100% contrary to those compliance and funding procedures. They avoid the NEPA and preparation of EIS’s of entire planned programs by segmenting the program into smaller units and use unjustified categorical exclusions for each segment. The result of these practices is to hide airport aviation expansions, deny public and agencies participation in state and federal funding and ignore their own guidelines and procedures. Our city TxDOT and FAA expect us to follow proper guidelines and truthfulness or have our objections and concerns denied recognition, but everywhere I look I see lies and deception that they exhibit every day. I am ashamed and embarrassed for them all for their constant lack of integrity. Page 56 of 164 City of Georgetown, Texas Transportation Advisory Board July 14, 2017 SUBJECT: Cons id eration and p o s s ib le rec o mmendation to approve the Airp o rt Ord inanc e 12.32. - Georgetown Municipal Airport Us e Regulations – Rus s Volk, C.M., Airport Manager and Oc tavio A. Garza, P.E, C.P.M., Public Wo rks Direc tor ITEM SUMMARY: The Airp o rt Ordinanc e provid es Rules and R egulations for tho s e who o p erate at the Geo rgeto wn Municipal Airport. Airport spons ors mus t allow us e of the airpo rt b y all types, kinds, and c las s es o f aeronautical activity as well as by the general p ublic . Airp o rt rules and regulatio ns p ro vide a means to c ontrol o p erations at a p ublic airport to p ro tec t b o th aeronautical ac tivities and p ublic safety. The Ord inanc e is d ivided into the fo llo wing s ec tions : General Guid anc e Airp ort Operatio ns Leasing The updated vers ion removed dup licate language and any p o tential conflicts b etween Federal Aviation Adminis tration and other regulatory guidance. During the up d ate o f this o rd inance, inp ut was s o licited from s elect airport us ers , GTAB aviation board memb ers and the C ity Attorney's Office. FINANCIAL IMPACT: N/A SUBMITTED BY: Rus s Vo lk, C.M., Airport Manager ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Airport Ordinance Backup Material Page 57 of 164 {00009362 / v10 / / AIRPORT / ORD / 04/06/2017} CHAPTER 12.32. - GEORGETOWN MUNICIPAL AIRPORT USE REGULATIONS ARTICLE I. – GENERAL Sec. 12.32.010. - Definitions. “Airport Manager” means the City of Georgetown Airport Manager or designee. "Instrument approach" means an approach to an airport, with intent to land, by an aircraft flying in accordance with an IFR flight plan, when the visibility is less than three miles and/or when the ceiling is at or below the minimum initial altitude. "Marking" means a pattern of contrasting colors placed on the pavement, turf, or other usable surface by paint or other means to provide specific information to aircraft pilots and sometimes to operators of ground vehicles, on the movement areas. "Night" means the time between the end of evening civil twilight and the beginning of morning civil twilight, as published in the American Air Almanac, converted to local time. "Person" means unless context clearly indicates otherwise, the "person" as used herein shall mean any natural person, estate, club, organization, firm, association (whether incorporated or not), partnership, corporation, or legal entity of any kind. "Restricted area" means an airport property designated for the safe operation of aircraft. "Runway" means a defined rectangular area on a land airport prepared for the landing and takeoff run of aircraft along its length. "Straight-in approach—IFR" means an instrument approach wherein final approach is begun without first having executed a procedure turn, not necessarily completed with a straight-in landing or made to straight-in landing minimums. "Straight-in approach—VFR" means entry into the traffic pattern by interception of the extended runway centerline (final approach course) without executing any other portion of the traffic pattern. (See "traffic pattern"). "Taxilane" means a defined path in the aircraft parking area intended to provide taxiing aircraft access between the taxiways and the aircraft parking positions. "Taxiway" means a defined path, usually paved, over which aircraft can taxi from one part of an airport to another. "Terminal building" means a building or buildings designed to accommodate the enplaning and deplaning activities of flight crews and passengers. Page 58 of 164 {00009362 / v10 / / AIRPORT / ORD / 04/06/2017} "T-hangar" means an aircraft hangar in which aircraft are parked alternately tail to tail, each in the T-shaped space left by the other row of aircraft or aircraft compartments. "Traffic pattern" means the traffic flow that is prescribed for aircraft landing at, taxiing on, or taking off from an airport. The components of a typical traffic pattern are upwind leg, crosswind leg, downwind leg, base leg, and final approach: A. Upwind leg—A flight path parallel to the landing runway in the direction of landing. B. Crosswind leg—A flight path at right angles to the landing runway off its upwind end. C. Downwind leg—A flight path parallel to the landing runway in the direction opposite to landing. The downwind leg normally extends between the crosswind leg and the base leg. D. Base leg—A flight path at right angles to the landing runway off its approach end. The base leg normally extends from the downwind leg to the intersection of the extended runway centerline. E. Final approach—A flight path in the direction of landing along the extended runway centerline. The final approach normally extends from the base leg to the runway. An aircraft making a straight-in approach VFR is also considered to be on final approach. Sec. 12.32.020. – General provisions. A. Authority. These Regulations are enacted by the City of Georgetown, for the operation of the Airport, pursuant to the powers and duties of the City of Georgetown, Texas, a home rule municipal corporation, and applicable state and federal laws. B. Alteration of Airport Property. No person shall erect or alter any sign, building, aircraft parking or storage area, leased area or other airport property, without prior written permission from the City. Such persons shall comply with all building codes and permit procedures of the airport and City and shall deliver to the Airport Manager as-built plans upon completion. C. Abandoned Property. No person shall abandon any property, ie. airplanes, vehicles, household items, etc. at the Airport. D. Knowledge of Regulations implied; copies of article available. These Regulations are available at all times on the official website of the City. E. Conflict of Regulations. In the event of conflict between these Regulations and the FAA regulations, the latter prevails. F. Security. All users of the Airport shall follow the Municipal Airport Security Awareness Program guidelines available in the terminal building. Page 59 of 164 {00009362 / v10 / / AIRPORT / ORD / 04/06/2017} G. Control of debris, foreign objects, glass. 1) No glass bottles may be used near an aircraft operations area, except within private hangars or other leased premises. 2) All Airport users shall endeavor to keep all aircraft operations areass clear of glass, debris and foreign objects so as to avoid or reduce possible damage to aircraft. Users are encouraged to pick up loose property, and dispose of such material, or report the presence of such material to the Airport Manger's office. H. Use of another’s property. Unless authorized by the owner, the use of any aircraft, parts, equipment, accessories or tools of another, situated on said airport, is forbidden, and no person shall enter, climb upon, or in any way tamper with, any aircraft not owned by that person unless permission has been granted by the owner or the person is accompanied by the owner. I. No signs or equipment or portable buildings and house trailers may be erected, moved in or installed except as may be specifically authorized by the City Council. J. Reporting damage to airport equipment and or facilities. Any person damaging any airport equipment and or facilities by operation of an aircraft or otherwise shall immediately report such damage to the Airport Manager. K. Registration of persons and aircraft. All aircraft based at the Airport shall be registered by the owner at the office of the Airport Manager with either a properly executed lease agreement with the City for a hangar space or a tiedown space, or a properly executed airport tenant agreement if the aircraft occupies space subleased or provided, with or without a fee or charge, by a primary airport ground or facilities lessee. It shall be the responsibility of the primary lessee to provide the necessary information for the proper execution of the airport tenant agreement. L. Authority of Airport Manager to suspend or restrict operations; safeguard of persons and property. The airport manager may suspend or restrict any operations whenever necessary in the interest of safety, and will provide notice of such action as is reasonable and necessary. Sec. 12.32.030. – Restricted area. A. All airport property is a restricted area, with the exception of the main access road (Terminal Drive), and Airport Terminal building. B. Persons who may enter restricted area. No person shall enter the designated restricted areas unless he has permission from the Airport Manager, holds a current license or lease with the City of Georgetown for an Airport facility, holds an FAA license, or is an invited visitor of such a person. Employees or invited visitors are the responsibility of their sponsor for compliance with all Airport Regulations. Page 60 of 164 {00009362 / v10 / / AIRPORT / ORD / 04/06/2017} Sec. 12.32.040. – Use of land within the airport. Property within the airport may be used only for aeronautical purposes, provide, however, that nothing herein shall prohibit a secondary non-aeronautical use of such land if: 1. The primary aeronautical need is not interfered with; 2. It is not in violation of FAA or Texas Department of Transportation regulations; 3. Is specifically authorized by owner; and 4. If such secondary use will benefit the airport or provide better for its maintenance or development. Sec. 12.32.050. – Fire regulations. A. All transportation, storage and other handling of aircraft and vehicle fuel shall comply with: the International Fire Code, 2012 Edition or later, as amended by the Georgetown City Council, and FAA Advisory Circular 150/5230-4. B. Every person using the airport or its facilities, in any manner, shall exercise reasonable care and caution to prevent fire. C. All fire lanes are to be kept clear. D. Hangar entrances shall be kept clear at all times. E. Smoking any substance, including e-cigarettes, or any open flame, is prohibited within 50 feet of any aircraft, fuel truck, hangar, or fuel storage tank. No person shall smoke, or otherwise ignite a match or lighter for the purpose of smoking in or within 25 feet of any door or air intake on any public hangar, offices, waiting rooms, or buildings. F. Compressed or inflammable gas, not ordinarily used for aviation purposes, shall not be kept or stored upon the airport, except in places designated by the Airport Manager. G. No flammable substances shall be used inside a hangar or other building without prior permission from the City Fire Department. H. Painting of aircraft inside hangars is specifically prohibited, except that small maintenance or repair projects such as paint touch-up or treating small areas to prevent corrosion are allowed. I. The floors in all buildings shall be kept clean and free from oil. Volatile, flammable substances shall NOT be used for cleaning floors. Page 61 of 164 {00009362 / v10 / / AIRPORT / ORD / 04/06/2017} J. In the event of spillage or dripping of gasoline, oil, grease or an y other material which may be unsightl y or detrimental to the airport, the same shall be removed immediately and the affected area shall be restored to its condition prior to the spillage or dripping. The responsibility for such removal and restoration shall be assumed by the operator or owner of the equipment causing the same, or by the tenant or concessionaire responsible for the spillage or dripping. In the event of failure by the responsible person to remove the material and restore the affected area, the Airport Manager may arrange for removal and restoration and may charge the responsible person for all resulting costs. K. All Airport tenants, lessees, licensees and permittees shall supply and maintain such adequate and readily accessible fire extinguishers as may be required by applicable fire codes and regulations. Each fire extinguisher shall carry a suitable tag showing the date of most recent inspection. At least one fire extinguisher with a Class 2A, 10BC rating shall be installed by the hangar tenant in each hangar to comply with the City Code of Ordinances. Extinguishers shall be mounted not less than five inches from the floor of the hangar, and not more than five feet from the hangar door. The City has the right to inspect all facilities to ensure that fire extinguishers are properly mounted and maintained. Sec. 12.32.060. - Airport Layout Plan (ALP). The Airport Manager and the FAA have on file a copy of the most recent FAA-approved ALP for the airport. It provides for orderly development and maximization of return from the airport. All development and activities on the airport and all proposed leases of portion of the airport must comply with the ALP. Sec. 12.32.070. - Adoption of minimum standards for commercial and non -commercial operators. "Minimum Standards for Commercial and Non-Commercial Operators at Airport" ("Minimum Standards") are concurrently enacted by the Georgetown City Council and are incorporated by reference for all purposes as if set forth in full. Sec. 12.32.080. - Commercial activity requires permit. No person or entity shall use the Airport to conduct commercial activities without written approval from the Airport Manager, and (when applicable) a permit as required in the Minimum Standards. Sec. 12.32.090. - Penalty for violation. A. A person who violates this Chapter, or willfully obstructs or prevents compliance with this Chapter, commits an offense punishable as provided in Section 1.08.010. Each day a violation continues is a separate offense. B. In addition to the penalty provided in subsection A, the Airport Manager may deny use of the Airport to a person who: Page 62 of 164 {00009362 / v10 / / AIRPORT / ORD / 04/06/2017} 1. Violates or otherwise does not comply with this chapter; or 2. Commits or is about to commit a breach of the peace. C. A person commits an offense if the person remains on airport property after receiving notice from a police officer to leave the property. Sec. 12.32.100. – Fueling at the airport. A. Fuel Sales and Purchase. 1) Except as expressly permitted by these Regulations, no p erson shall store fuel at the Airport. 2) All fuel provided for sale on the airport must be purchased from the City of Georgetown Airport Fuel Storage Facility. 3) Fuel flow fees and margin rates will be determined by the City Council from time to time. 4) The City Council authorizes the General Manager of Utilities to establish regulations, policies, and fees governing airport fuel sales. The General Manager of Utilities shall update City Council within one year following fuel policy changes. 5) Public sale of automobile gasoline for use in aircraft shall not be permitted on the airport without approval by the Airport Manager. Aircraft authorized by the FAA to use auto gas may be privately fueled by their owner; only after compliance with established Regulations adopted by the Airport and City of Georgetown Fire Department. B. Fuel Storage and Fuel Trucks 1) Unless otherwise approved b y the Airport Manager moveable fuel storage tanks are prohibited at the airport except for: i. Fuel trucks constructed, operated and maintained in all respects as required by law and this Chapter. ii. Permanent fuel tanks in an operable aircraft. iii. Tanks not exceeding one-gallon capacity used solely for sampling and testing fuel, engines and fuel handling apparatus. Page 63 of 164 {00009362 / v10 / / AIRPORT / ORD / 04/06/2017} iv. Trucks lawfully transporting fuel for immediate dispensing into a fuel storage tank permitted by these Regulations. Such vehicles shall access the airport at a point approved by the Airport Manager. 2) Aviation or automobile fuels shall not be stored within any hangar, except that which is contained in aircraft fuel tanks or approved safety containers, and in quantities not to exceed those established by the City of Georgetown Fire Department. 3) Aircraft refueling vehicles, other moveable aircraft fuel containers and refueling devices shall be stored outside and not less than fifty (50) feet from a building, or such other distance as shall be approved by Airport Manager and City Fire Department. 4) All fuel trucks/fueling equipment shall be equipped, labeled, operated, and maintained in accordance with National Fire Protection Association, Inc., NFPA Manual 407, "Aircraft Fuel Servicing". 5) Refueling/Defueling of aircraft fuel servicing vehicles must be perfor med outdoors. 6) Maintenance of fueling systems on aircraft fuel servicing vehicles must be performed outdoors or in a building approved for that purpose. 7) Fuel trucks/fueling equipment are prohibited from all grassy areas on the Airport. 8) When not performing servicing operations, fuel trucks/fueling equipment must be parked on a concrete surface. 9) Aircraft refueling vehicles shall be parked in a manner, which provides a minimum of ten (10) feet of separation between said vehicle and any other vehicle, or aircraft refueling device. C. Self-Fueling. 1) Persons wishing to supply and dispense aviation fuel for their own private use must first obtain authorization from the Airport Manager. Owners of aircraft based at the Airport who desire to self-fuel their aircraft, shall apply for and receive self-fueling approval from the Airport Manager. Use of the Airport Public fuel pumps does not constitute self -fueling. 2) Fuel Flow Fees shall be paid to the airport by those who choose to "Self-Fuel." 3) A person approved for Self-Fueling Operations shall not dispense aircraft fuel to another airport user. Page 64 of 164 {00009362 / v10 / / AIRPORT / ORD / 04/06/2017} D. Fueling Regulations 1) The Airport shall require all self-fueling and FBO fuel-handling personnel to accomplish FAA approved training courses and receive periodic refresher training as required b y the Airport and City Fire Department. Documentation of training must be provided to Airport Manager. 2) All aviation fuel nozzles must have "dead man" controls that will shut off the fuel flow when the nozzle hand control is released. Automatic fuel cut-off nozzles MAY NOT be substituted for “dead man” controls for fueling. "Dead man" controls are required on all single-point refueling systems. 3) Aircraft shall not be fueled when an engine is running except that emergency services helicopters/airplanes on a fast-turn-around may be fueled with the engine idling, at the discretion of the fixed-base operator and the pilot. The pilot assumes responsibility for any passengers on board during "hot" refueling. 4) At least two twenty-pound Class 2, BC portable fire extinguishers shall be accessible on a fueling apparatus. 5) Fueling of aircraft or fuel trucks is prohibited during thunderstorm activity within five miles of airport. 6) Truck to truck fuel transfers are not permitted on the airport. 7) All aircraft shall be positively grounded during fueling. Aircraft fueled from a fuel truck must be grounded to the fuel truck. 8) All aircraft fueling shall be performed outdoors. Aircraft being fueled shall be positioned so that aircraft fuel system vents or fuel tank openings are not closer than twenty-five (25) feet from any building, facility or hangar unless otherwise approved by the Airport Manager and City Fire Department. Page 65 of 164 {00009362 / v10 / / AIRPORT / ORD / 04/06/2017} ARTICLE II. - AIRPORT OPERATIONS Sec. 12.32.200. – General airport operations rules and regulations. A. No person shall walk, stand, or loiter in the airside area where such activity may be an operational or safety concern. B. The use of bicycles, motor scooters, and motorcycles on the ramp is restricted to licensed drivers only. These modes of transportation are not allowed past the west end of the hangar row with the exception of loading or unloading of aircraft. C. Playing on ramp, taxiways, or runway is prohibited. D. Double parking at hangars is prohibited. E. All parachute, glider, ultralight, and banner towing operations are prohibited. F. Only aircraft and airmen licensed by the FAA shall operate aircraft at the Airport, but this limitation shall not apply to students in training under licensed instructors nor to public aircraft of the federal government or of a state, territory or political subdivision thereof, or to aircraft licensed by a foreign government with which the United States has a reciprocal agreement covering the operation of such licensed aircraft. Sec. 12.32.210. - Vehicular traffic. A. All vehicular traffic shall be confined to the roads, streets, avenues and alleys provided on the grounds for that purpose, and shall operate at posted speeds. If not posted, the speed limit on airport streets is 25 miles per hour. The maximum speed limit for all vehicles in the airside area, with the exception of authorized municipal vehicles in the performance their official duties, is 15 miles per hour, unless posted otherwise. B. Vehicles should make use of the service roads on the east side of the hangar buildings when proceeding to individual hangars or business locations on the airport. The ramp area is restricted to aircraft, fuel trucks, and airport maintenance vehicles only, except for tenants proceeding to assigned tie-downs occupied by their owned aircraft. C. No person shall use at the airport any vehicle not licensed or otherwise permitted by state law for operation on a public street or highway. This section does not pertain to City/County vehicles or vehicles used solel y for tugging, marshaling, or refueling aircraft. On a case-b y-case basis, and with the prior written approval of the Airport Manager, other modes of transportation may be used on the airport. D. All vehicles shall yield right of way to aircraft in motion and emergency vehicles. E. No vehicle shall approach closer than one hundred (100) feet to any aircraft whose engines are running, excluding ground service and emergency vehicles. Page 66 of 164 {00009362 / v10 / / AIRPORT / ORD / 04/06/2017} F. All vehicles, upon entering or exiting a closed airport access gate, shall wait for the gate to completel y close behind them before proceeding to their destination so as to not allow the entr y of an unauthorized vehicle. G. No v ehicle shall be operated on the Runways or Taxiways unless so authorized by the Airport Manager or Control Tower . H. Any vehicle authorized to operate on the Airport Runways or Taxiways shall display a rotating or flashing beacon that complies with FAA Advisor y Circular 150/5210-5B. I. All vehicles authorized to operate on Taxiwa ys or the Runways must carry a two-way aviation radio, and must receive clearance from, and remain in continuous communications with, the Airport Traffic Control Tower (ATCT) should one be active. Regardless whether an ATCT is active, any vehicle authorized to access the Taxiways or Runways is required to monitor 119.125, the ground frequency for the airport; and 120.225, the tower frequency and have the ability to communicate with aircraft via a two- way aviation radio. J. The Airport Manager may cause to be removed from any area of the airport any vehicle which is disabled, abandoned, parked in violation of these Regulations, or which presents an operational problem to any area of the airport, at the operator’s expense and without liability for damage which may result in the course of such movement. K. Motor homes, boats, and recreational vehicles shall not be stored anywhere on the airport unless specifically authorized by City. L. Parking Restrictions. No person shall park or leave any vehicle standing, except within a designated parking area. Aircraft owners and operators may park their vehicle in covered aircraft hangars designated for their aircraft, provided the vehicle is parked so as to be completel y contained in the aircraft hangar and not obstruct adjacent areas or Taxilanes. Hangar tenants may temporarily park their vehicles immediately outside their hangar, but may not leave them unattended, even for a short time. Such vehicles shall be expeditiously moved to allow passage of taxiing aircraft when clearance is required. M. Vehicle Repair. No person shall clean or make any repairs to vehicles anywhere on the airport, other than in designated shop areas, except those minor repairs necessary to remove such vehicles from the airport. Sec. 12.32.220. - Aircraft ground operations. A. Tie-down or Securing of Aircraft 1) All Aircraft not hangered shall be tied down or secured when unattended, at night or during inclement weather. Page 67 of 164 {00009362 / v10 / / AIRPORT / ORD / 04/06/2017} 2) It is the responsibility of the pilot when leaving a parked aircraft unattended to ensure that the brakes are set or that the aircraft is properly chocked or tied down. B. Running aircraft engines. 1) No engine shall be run unless a competent operator is at the controls of the aircraft; and no engine shall be run inside any hangar or building. 2) No engine shall be run unless the aircraft is in such position that the propeller stream will clear all buildings and groups of people in the observation areas and path of the aircraft. 3) If not equipped with adequate brakes, the engine shall not be started in an aircraft unless the wheels have been set with blocks attached to ropes or other suitable means for removing them. 4) Pilots are prohibited from loading or unloading their aircraft, or emplaning/deplaning an aircraft with the engine running. 5) Aircraft engines shall only be run at idle when on the ground, except as may be necessary for safe taxiing operations, taking off, landing, preflight testing, and m aintenance testing. 6) All aircraft preflight engine run-ups shall be conducted in the appropriate run-up areas. C. Taxiing aircraft. 1) Aircraft will be taxied at a safe and prudent speed, and in such manner as to be under the control of the pilot at all times. 2) No aircraft equipped with an anti-collision beacon shall start before such beacon has been activated. 3) During the hours the control tower is in operation, all taxi operations in the movement areas will be as directed by Air Traffic Control instruction. After hours, aircraft shall communicate desired movements on Common Traffic Advisory frequency. D. Parking aircraft. 1) Aircraft shall not be parked in a movement area, within 400 feet of any part of the landing or take-off area of the airport, or in such a manner as to hinder the normal maneuvering or operation of other aircraft unless specifically authorized by the airport manager as an emergency measure. Page 68 of 164 {00009362 / v10 / / AIRPORT / ORD / 04/06/2017} 2) All Aircraft shall be parked in the areas designated for this purpose by the Airport Manager. 3) Any aircraft parked in violation of this section, that presents an operational or safet y concern in any area of the airport, shall be moved on order of the Airport Manager at owner’s expense. The City shall not be liable for any damages that may result from the relocation of the aircraft. 4) Any person who parks an aircraft in a transient aircraft parking and storage area shall remit to the Airport Manager or FBO any applicable transient parking fees, as approved by the City. E. Disabled and non-airworthy aircraft. 1) Aircraft owners and operators shall promptly remove disabled aircraft and parts thereof, unless directed by the Airport Manager or the FAA or the National Transportation Safety Board to delay such removal pending an investigation of an accident. In the event of failure to promptly remove such disabled aircraft, the Airport Manager may cause the aircraft to be removed and bill the owners for applicable costs. The City shall not be responsible for damage to disabled aircraft removed by the owner, the operator, or other persons. 2) Non-airworthy aircraft are not permitted to be stored outside a hangar. 3) In the event of failure to promptly remove such non-airworthy or abandoned aircraft, the Airport Manager may cause the aircraft to be removed and bill the owners thereof for all charges incurred in the removal. The City shall not be responsible for damage to non-airworthy or abandoned aircraft removed by the owner, the operator, or other persons. 4) Airport Manager can use log books and inspection of airplane to determine airworthiness. F. Aircraft washing. To comply with the Airport's Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), aircraft may only be washed at the Airport wash rack except those aircraft washed on designated paved portions of the ramps of Fixed-Base Operator's that are co- permittees with the City of Georgetown. Wash racks shall be used for purposes of washing and polishing aircraft, and any other purpose approved by the Airport Manager. Washing/cleaning materials and run-off shall be used and disposed of in compliance with all applicable federal, state, county and local laws and regulations. Page 69 of 164 {00009362 / v10 / / AIRPORT / ORD / 04/06/2017} G. Aircraft repairs. 1) No aircraft shall be repaired on any part of the landing or take-off area, and all repairs shall be made at the places designated by the Airport Manager for such purpose. 2) No aircraft engine maintenance testing will be performed where the exhaust or propeller blast may cause injur y to persons, or do damage to property, or spread debris. City may require repair facility to install Blast Deflectors to prevent injury to persons or damage to property. Aircraft engine maintenance testing above 80% power will only be accomplished at the run-up area for Runway 36 or on Taxiway K or in locations designated by Airport Manager. Engine maintenance testing below 80% power performed in the vicinity of any hangar must be approved by the Airport Manager. At no time will an engine be operated above 80% power in vicinity of hangar or taxiing airplanes. Sec. 12.32.230. - Aircraft landing and takeoff operations. During the hours the control tower is in operation, pilots must abide by Air Traffic Control (ATC) instructions. During hours when ATC is not available, the following procedures apply. Pilots are governed by those regulations promulgated by the FAA and additionally are requested to observe the procedures set forth in the Aeronautical Information Manual and Airport Fly Friendly Program. Information from the Fly Friendly Program is available on the City web site. A. Take-offs, landing with calm winds. Runway 18/36 is designated as the calm wind runway. B. Take-offs, landings on apron, parking ramp prohibited, exception. No take-offs or landings shall be made on the apron or parking ramp, except under instructions from ATC. C. Take offs, landing over certain objects prohibited or restricted. No aircraft, except helicopters, shall land or take off in such a manner as to clear any public street or highway at an altitude of less than 100 feet nor land or take off on the taxiway or any turf area or over hangars, or other structures, automobile parking areas or groups of spectators. D. Stop and go landings and take-offs. Stop and go operations are permitted as long as they do not present an excessive (over one minute) delay to other aircraft operating in the traffic pattern. Not more than three stop and go operations will be conducted in succession. E. Traffic pattern elevation. Traffic pattern altitude for small piston airplanes is 800 to 1,000 feet above ground level (AGL). Traffic pattern altitude for jet airplanes is 1500 feet AGL. F. Take-off climb. On take-off, all aircraft should climb straight out to a level of 800 feet AGL, clear the airport boundary and execute either a 90 degree turn to the left or right entering the traffic pattern, or a straight out departure. G. Traffic flow. Page 70 of 164 {00009362 / v10 / / AIRPORT / ORD / 04/06/2017} 1. All aircraft landing at the Airport should fly a standard left hand traffic pattern when the favored runway is 11 or 18; or a right hand traffic pattern when the favored runway is 29 or 36.. 2. Aircraft entering the traffic pattern shall exercise caution and practice courtesy so as not to cause aircraft already in the pattern to deviate from their course. Sec. 12.32.240. - Special traffic procedures. The Airport Manager may, in the interest of safety, designate special traffic procedures for certain operations, such as air shows, agricultural operations, flying club operations, etc. Sec. 12.32.250. - Agricultural operations. Agricultural spraying operations, if authorized, will be conducted in accordance with procedures approved by the Airport Manager and only from the areas designed on the airport. Sec. 12.32.260. - Student training and familiarization. A. Aircraft shall not be permitted to remain stationary on the landing or take-off areas for the purpose of instructing students. Such in-the-cockpit instruction will be given after the aircraft clears the active runway, and is in a location where the aircraft does not present an obstruction to other aircraft operations. Sec. 12.32.270. - Helicopter operations. During the hours the control tower is in operation, helicopters must abide by Air Traffic Control instructions. After hours, the following procedures apply: A. Helicopters shall at all times maintain clear separation from other traffic and operations. All taxi operations shall be conducted with vigilance and shall be conducted at a safe distance from all structures, obstructions, and persons, specifically taking into consideration the effect of downwash and noise. C. Training exercises shall be conducted west of Runway 18/36 in the vicinity of the Taxiway J. All operations will be under guidance of Air Traffic Control Tower. Sec. 12.32.280. - Flying clubs. Flying clubs desiring to base their aircraft and operate on the airport must comply with the applicable provisions of the Minimum Standards and these Regulations. They shall be exempt from the regular fixed base operator and/or commercial operator requirements upon satisfactory fulfillment of the conditions contained herein. Page 71 of 164 {00009362 / v10 / / AIRPORT / ORD / 04/06/2017} A. The club shall be a nonprofit entity (corporation, association or partnership) organized for the express purpose of providing its members with aircraft for their personal use and enjoyment only. The ownership of the aircraft must be vested in the name of the flying club (or owned proportionately by all of its members). B. Flying clubs may not offer or conduct charter, air taxi, or rentals of aircraft operations. They may not conduct aircraft flight instruction except for regular members, and only members of the flying club may act as pilot in command of the aircraft except when receiving dual instruction. C. All flying clubs and their members are prohibited from leasing or selling any goods or services whatsoever to any person or firm other than a member of such club at the airport except that said flying club may sell or exchange its capital equipment. D. Flying clubs, with its permit request, shall furnish the Airport Manager with: 1. A copy of its charter and by-laws, articles of association, partnership agreement and other documentation supporting its existence; 2. A roster, or list of members, including names of officers and directors, and investment share held by each member to be revised on a semi-annual basis; 3. Evidence of insurance in the form of a certificate of insurance as set out in the minimum standards under exempt flying clubs; 4. Number and type of aircraft; including registration numbers of each; 5. Evidence that ownership is vested in the club; 6. Operating rules of the club. E. The club's books shall be subject to audit by the City of Georgetown and/or its auditors to ensure of the non-profitability of the club. F. Commercial flying clubs require approval from City to operate as a Specialized Aviation Services Operator (SASO). Commercial flying clubs are described as those entities engaged in the ownership or lease of aircraft and providing flying services for its members and others but which do not meet the rigid requirements established for not-for-profit clubs. Commercial flying clubs shall have at least one tie-down or adequate hangar space leased from the airport owner or FBO for each owned or leased aircraft. Page 72 of 164 {00009362 / v10 / / AIRPORT / ORD / 04/06/2017} ARTICLE III. - LEASING Sec. 12.32.300. - Lease provision and restrictions. The following provision/restrictions shall apply to all leased Airport property. A. No leases will exceed periods of 30 years. B. Any private structure or hangar not in use for aviation purposes for a period in excess of three months, or not available for rent or sublease for aviation purposes, unless so authorized by the City, must be removed after due notice is given in writing. If not removed, the City will consider such structures or hangars abandoned and title will pass to the City. C. Leased land from which any building, hangar, or structure is removed after due notice will be cleaned and returned to good condition by the owner of said building, hangar, or structure. Portable and temporary building will not be allowed on airport grounds, unless they are necessary for construction projects. D. Leased property on the airport may be subleased by the lessee only with approval by the Airport Manager, or the City Council if appropriate. E. No structures may be erected beyond the building restriction line or in conflict with the approved Airport Master Plan/Airport Layout Plan. F. All construction must be authorized by the City Council and must be a compatible standard capable of withstanding winds of 80 mph, with doors open or closed. G. All structures must comply with all applicable regulations including building codes adopted by the City of Georgetown, the City Code of Ordinances, Unified Development Code, and Airport Planned Unit Development Guidelines H. Storage of non-aviation vehicles or equipment in a private hangar, or conducting non- aviation business in any structure is prohibited unless approved by the Airport Manager. Under no circumstances, whether approved or not, will the City be liable for damage or destruction of any vehicles or equipment. I. All tenants must comply with applicable requirements of the airport's Minimum Standards. J. All commercial operations or activities of any kind which are conducted on Airport are required to comply with the approved Minimum Standards for airport operators. K. Non-commercial leases are prohibited from being used to engage in commercial activity on Airport. Page 73 of 164 {00009362 / v10 / / AIRPORT / ORD / 04/06/2017} Sec. 12.32.310. - City-owned hangars. A. T-hangars owned by the City may be rented to private individuals, companies or corporations on a monthly basis for the storage of aircraft and required aircraft support items. T-hangars will be rented at rates established by the City. Only the aircraft listed on the T-hanger or tie down lease may be stored or parked at the location. B. Preventive aircraft maintenance may be conducted on the aircraft listed on the lease pursuant to other applicable regulations. C. Box hangars currently constructed and owned by the city may be rented or leased for the purpose of conducting aviation activities. Box hangars will be rented at rates established by the City. D. Rents will be paid by the first day of the month, with the first month's rent paid in advance. E. Hangars will not be modified from their original state unless authorized by the Airport Manager. F. The Airport Manager will be authorized to enter into month to month leases meeting the terms and conditions of these Regulations. G. Oily rags, oil wastes, rags and other rubbish and trash ma y only be stored in containers with self-closing, tight-fitting lids as approved by the Airport Manager. H. Airport hangars shall be subject to inspections by the Airport Manager and City Fire Department to ensure compliance with all laws, ordinances and this Code. Sec. 12.32.320. - Self services. A. Persons are permitted to wash, repair, or otherwise service their own aircraft, provided there is no attempt to perform such services for others and further provided that such right is conditioned upon compliance with these Regulations and all applicable laws. B. An aircraft owner or lessee may hire an individual or a technical specialist to provide, under his direction and supervision, services only on the owner’s aircraft. C. An aircraft owner or lessee must ensure any individual or technical specialist placed under hire meets the City Minimum Insurance requirements and have approval from City to provide services on the airport. Page 74 of 164 City of Georgetown, Texas Transportation Advisory Board July 14, 2017 SUBJECT: Cons id eration and p o s s ib le rec o mmendation to approve the Airp o rt Minimum Standards – Russ Volk, C.M., Airport Manager and Oc tavio A. Garza, P.E, C .P.M., Pub lic Wo rks Direc to r ITEM SUMMARY: The Airp o rt Minimum Standards p ro vide guidelines to operate as either a co mmercial o r no n-c o mmercial o p erator at the Geo rgeto wn Munic ip al Airpo rt. The o wner of a p ublic us e airport whic h has a grant o r loan obligations with either the Federal Aviation Adminis tration (FAA) o r the State o f Texas is req uired to make that airp o rt availab le to all q ualified users and p ro viders witho ut an unjus t b ias or d is criminatio n. Minimum Stand ards helps to ensure all s imilar typ e users o f the airport are expec ted to meet the s ame requirements . The fo llo wing s ec tions are inc luded in the stand ard s : Sec tion 1 – General S tand ard s Sec tion 2 – Do ing Bus ines s at the Airp o rt Sec tion 3 – F ixed-Bas e Op erators and Spec ialized Aviation S ervic e Operations Sec tion 4 – F lying Club s Sec tion 5 - Ins urance Sec tion 6 – Build ing/Improvement Stand ards Sec tion 7 - Leas ing During the up d ate o f these s tand ard s , input was s olic ited fro m the Fixed -Bas e Op erators, other airp o rt b usines s es , all airp o rt us ers, GTAB aviation b o ard members and the City Attorney's Office. FINANCIAL IMPACT: N/A SUBMITTED BY: Rus s Vo lk, C.M., Airport Manager ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Airport Minimum Standards Backup Material Page 75 of 164 XXX/XX/2017 MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL AND NON-COMMERCIAL OPERATORS AT THE GEORGETOWN MUNICIPAL AIRPORT OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS XXX __, 2017 Page 76 of 164 XXX/XX/2017 Minimum Standards Table of Contents Section 1 – General Standards Section 2 – Doing Business at the Airport Section 3 – Fixed-Base Operators and Specialized Aviation Service Operations Section 4 – Flying Clubs Section 5 – Insurance Section 6 – Building/Improvement Standards Section 7 – Leasing Appendix A – Definitions Appendix B – Business Application Page 77 of 164 XXX/XX/2017 GS-1 SECTION 1 GENERAL STANDARDS Page 78 of 164 XXX/XX/2017 GS-2 Section 1 – General Standards The following Minimum Standards for Commercial and Non-Commercial Operators at the Georgetown Municipal Airport (“Minimum Standards”) have been adopted by the City of Georgetown City Council for the Georgetown Municipal Airport (“Airport”). Appendix A contains the definitions used in this document. Defined terms are capitalized. The Minimum Standards regulate conduct of Aeronautical Activities at the Airport, and specify certain provisions that will be included in the Airport lease, license, permit or concession agreements, and apply uniformly to all persons operating at the Airport. Any person operating on or from the Airport consents to be bound by these standards. Failure by Airport users to comply with the Minimum Standards could result in loss of use of the Airport. GS-1. Implementation Official. The Airport Manager shall enforce the Minimum Standards. GS-2. Airport Open on Nondiscriminatory Basis. Facilities on the Airport shall be open to all classes of users on fair and not unjustly discriminatory bases. The FAA has exclusive jurisdiction to determine issues of fair treatment and unjust discrimination. GS-3. Hangar Space. Except as otherwise provided in this section, no person may offer for hire on the Airport any hangar or shelter for aircraft, related service equipment, or surface vehicle unless such person has leased premises from the City as an FBO or SASO. GS-4. Compliance with Laws and Health, Fire, Construction, and Zoning Codes. All persons utilizing the Airport shall comply with Federal, State, and local laws, including the requirements of all City health, fire, construction, and zoning codes applicable to the Airport and its operation. All construction on the Airport shall comply with all generally applicable building codes adopted by the City. GS-5. Inspections. To the extent necessary to protect the rights and interests of the City or to assure compliance with the Minimum Standards or a lease, the Airport Manager or authorized representative, or any representative of the FAA or state agency having jurisdiction over the Airport, shall have the right to enter and inspect, upon notice, during reasonable hours, structures, premises, facilities, and improvements on the Airport to determine compliance with these Minimum Standards and any applicable lease provisions. Page 79 of 164 XXX/XX/2017 GS-3 GS-6. Surface Vehicles, Limits on Weight. No vehicle with dual-wheeled axle loadings of more than 40,000 pounds is allowed on any paved or treated aircraft movement or parking areas. GS-7. Civil Rights. Persons using this Airport shall comply with all provisions of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and implementing Part 21 of the Regulations of the U.S. Department of Transportation, and are hereby specifically prohibited from discrimination against any group or individual on the basis of race, creed, color, national origin, or sex. GS-8. Surface Vehicles on Airport. Except to the extent needed to service or load aircraft, no private or commercial vehicle shall be driven or parked on any other than designated roads or automobile parking areas. GS-9. Complaints. Complaints against any Aircraft Operator, Operator or their employee for violations of these Minimum Standards shall be in writing alleging the infraction, date, persons, and any witnesses thereto and signed by the complainant and filed with the Airport Manager. GS-10. Use of Land within the Airport. Property within the Airport may be primarily used only for Aeronautical Activities, but secondary non-aeronautical uses are permitted if: (1) the primary Aeronautical Activity is not interfered with; (2) it is not in violation of FAA regulations; (3) is specifically authorized by the City; and (4) if such secondary use will benefit the Airport or provide better for its maintenance or development. GS-11. Living Quarters. No person may make any temporary or permanent living quarters on Airport property. The Airport Manager may grant an exception for "Emergency Response" personnel. Page 80 of 164 XXX/XX/2017 GS-4 GS-12. Taxiway Access. If not already provided, each Operator conducting Aeronautical Activities shall provide paved access from its Leased premises to the Airport’s Taxiway/Taxilane/Apron or Ramp system. Such access shall meet all applicable FAA standards for the largest Aircraft type anticipated to use the Operator’s premises. GS-13. License, Certificates, and Authorizations. Each person conducting activities on or from the Airport, whether for compensation or not, must possess all licenses, certificates, and authorizations required by these Minimum Standards and by applicable law for the conduct of such operations. A. Rights under a license, authorization, or contract granted by the City are not exclusive rights. B. The City may terminate a license, permit or agreement after giving notice of default if the recipient fails to cure its default within 30 days, or such other time as may be specified in the license, permit, or agreement, except that notice and cure provisions for insurance requirements are set forth in Section 5. The Airport Manager may terminate the lease, license, permit, or agreement upon fourteen (14) days’ notice if the Licensee fails to maintain the required insurance. C. No improvements or modifications to Airport property may be made without the prior written consent of the City. D. No lease, license, permit, agreement, or any rights thereunder, shall be assigned without the prior approval of the City. The Airport Manager may require any potential assignee to submit biographical, financial information, credit and background check at least 30 days prior to a proposed assignment. Page 81 of 164 XXX/XX/2017 DB-1 SECTION 2 DOING BUSINESS AT THE AIRPORT Page 82 of 164 XXX/XX/2017 DB-2 Section 2 – Doing Business at the Airport DB-1. Doing Business at the Airport. All Commercial Operators must obtain a permit, license, lease or other agreement with the City prior to conducting any Commercial Operation at the Airport. The Minimum Standards shall be deemed to be a part of each Commercial Operator’s Lease, license, permit or agreement with the City unless any such standards or provisions are expressly waived or amended by the City. DB-2. Requirements of all Commercial Operators. Each Commercial Operator shall: A. Have use of adequate space in an existing facility, through lease or other agreement, sufficient to accommodate the proposed operation. B. Maintain insurance as required by the Minimum Standards. C. Pay all applicable established fees and charges when due, including Fuel Flowage Fees. Such fees shall be set by City Council and published in the Airport Rates and Charges. Airport Fuel Flowage Fees may be revised periodically and adjusted as the market dictates. D. Control the conduct and demeanor of its personnel, subtenants, licensees and invitees and, upon objection by the Airport Manager concerning the conduct or demeanor of any such person, shall immediately take all lawful steps necessary to cure the objection. E. Shall do nothing that interferes with the effectiveness or accessibility of any public utility system, drainage system, sewer system, fire protection system, sprinkler system, alarm system or fire hydrant and hoses. F. Provide for proper handling and disposal of all hazardous materials generated by the business. Handling and disposal must meet all federal, state and local guidelines. G. Meet all requirements outlined in the Airport Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program and Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasures Program. H. An Operator may not utilize space or land leased to another Operator without written permission from Lessee and City. Page 83 of 164 XXX/XX/2017 DB-3 DB-3. Multiple Activities by One Commercial Operator. Whenever a Commercial Operator conducts multiple activities pursuant to one lease, license, permit or agreement with the City, the Commercial Operator shall comply with the Minimum Standards set forth herein for each separate activity being conducted. If the Minimum Standards for one of the Commercial Operator’s activities are inconsistent with those for another of the Commercial Operator’s activities, then the Minimum Standards which are most beneficial to the Airport, and/or which are most protective of the public’s health, safety and welfare, shall control. DB-4. Activities not Covered by Minimum Standards. Any activity for which there are no specific Minimum Standards set forth herein shall be subject to such standards and provisions as are developed by the Airport Manager on a case-by-case basis and set forth in such Commercial Operator’s written lease, license, permit or agreement with or from the City. DB-5. Waiver or Modification of Standards. The City may waive or modify any portion of the Minimum Standards for the benefit of any governmental agency performing non-profit public services, emergency response, fire protection or fire-fighting operations. DB-6. Airport Business Permit Application Process. To conduct a Commercial Operation at the Airport, a Person shall submit an Airport Business Permit application and receive approval from the City. In addition to the following requirements, the Airport Manager may require the applicant to provide additional information when appropriate to ensure compliance with the Minimum Standards. The applicant shall, at minimum, submit the following documentation with the application: A. A detailed description of the scope of the intended operations, including all services to be offered. B. The amount of land, office space, and/or aircraft storage areas required for the operation. C. A detailed description of any improvements or modifications to be constructed or made to Airport property, including cost estimates and a construction timetable. D. The proposed hours of operation. Page 84 of 164 XXX/XX/2017 DB-4 E. Documentation of the applicant’s financial capabilities to construct any improvements and to conduct any proposed activities. F. A detailed description and/or evidence of the applicant’s technical abilities and experience in conducting the proposed activities, including personal references. G. The commencement date for the applicant’s activities and the term of the lease, license, permit or agreement sought, including all option periods. H. One of the following: 1. Corporate applicants shall provide a copy of the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws; 2. Limited Liability Company applicants shall provide their Certificate of Formation and Company Agreement; 3. Limited Partnership applicants shall provide a copy of the Certificate of Limited Partnership and Limited Partnership Agreement; or 4. General Partnership applicants shall provide a certified copy of the written partnership agreement. I. A copy of a current Certificate of Insurance, in the amounts outlined hereunder, naming the City of Georgetown as additional insured. Upon request, the Airport Manager may at any time review the insurance policy and licenses of a Commercial Operator. J. A copy of a current lease/sublease or other agreement with the City or an Airport tenant. K. A schedule of rates and charges for all services to be provided at the Airport. L. Copies of all applicable Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) certificates. M. Individual flight instructors not affiliated with a Commercial Operator, and FAA Designated Examiners, may provide services to pilots who operate their own aircraft without obtaining a license from the City. DB-7. Application Processing. The City shall review fully completed and submitted applications. The City may approve or disapprove an application for a license, permit or agreement to conduct activities at the Airport. The City may approve any such application that meets the criteria stated in the Minimum Standards. Grounds for denial include the following: Page 85 of 164 XXX/XX/2017 DB-5 A. The applicant does not meet the qualifications and standards set forth in the Minimum Standards. B. The proposed activities are likely to create a safety hazard at the Airport. C. The activities will require the City to expend funds, or to supply labor or materials as a result of the applicant’s activities if either City chooses not to do so, or if it will result in a financial loss to the Airport. D. No appropriate space or land is available to accommodate the proposed activities. E. The proposed activities are not consistent with the Airport Master Plan or Airport Layout Plan. F. The proposed activities will result in a congestion of Aircraft or Buildings, a reduction in Airport capacity, or an undue interference with other operations at the Airport. G. The applicant or any of its principals has knowingl y made any false or misleading statements in the course of applying for a license, permit or agreement. H. The applicant or any of its principals has a record of violating FAA regulations, or any other applicable laws, ordinances, rules or regulations, or Minimum Standards. I. The applicant has not submitted appropriate documentation supporting the proposed activity as required by Section 7, Doing Business on the Airport. J. Approval of the application would not be in the best interest of the Airport. Any denial on this ground must be within the discretion afforded to the City under applicable FAA regulations. Page 86 of 164 XXX/XX/2017 CO-1 SECTION 3 COMMERCIAL OPERATIONS Page 87 of 164 XXX/XX/2017 CO-2 Section 3 – Commercial Operations CO-1. General: Prior to operation as an Fixed-Base Operator (FBO) or Specialized Aviation Services Operator (SASO), an application must be filed pursuant to DB- 6 and approval must be granted by the City. CO-2. Fueling: Only an approved FBO may sell aviation fuel to the general public pursuant to an approved fuel license. All FBOs must purchase their fuel from the City. Private fuel storage facilities are not permitted on the Georgetown Municipal Airport, except to the limited extent that an individual Aircraft Operator, desiring to self-fuel only his Aircraft: (1) obtains written permission from the Airport Manager after demonstrating compliance with AC-150/5190/6; (2) obtains written permission from the City Fire Chief; and (3) provides written evidence of insurance covering such activity and complying with Section 5. Truck to truck fuel transfer is not permitted on the Airport. CO-3. Fixed-Base Operator (FBO) No person may operate as an FBO unless that person has received and currently holds a valid authorization from the City. In addition to the requirements of DB- 2, an FBO must meet and maintain the following requirements: A. Land and Facility Requirements. An FBO must have a lease and facility meeting the following requirements: 1. Apron: An FBO must have use of at least 7,500 square feet of tenant developed apron area (not including any building area, automobile parking area, etc.) to support Aircraft operations. This apron area shall accommodate the following: (a) Airplane Design Group II Aircraft (wingspans up to seventy-nine (79) feet); (b) Transient Aircraft parking for up to five (5) jet Aircraft (leased tie-down locations may be used to fulfil this requirement); (c) Circulation taxilanes to facilitate access to/from Aircraft parking and staging areas; and (d) Adequate area to simultaneously accommodate Transient Aircraft operations, towing of Aircraft to/from storage hangars, and staging of based Aircraft. Page 88 of 164 XXX/XX/2017 CO-3 2. Terminal Building: An FBO must have use of a tenant developed terminal building (non-hangar space) consisting of at least 2,000 square feet with a minimum of at least 1,000 square feet dedicated to customer service and support functions. 3. Hangar: An FBO must have a hangar facility of at least 22,000 square feet. 4. Shop: An FBO must have use of at least 1,000 square feet of shop space to support aircraft maintenance and repair activities, including the storage of parts and accessories, unless such activities have been subcontracted under paragraph CO-6 below. 5. The Terminal Building and Shop may be attached to the Hangar Facility. B. FBO Services. An FBO must provide the following services: 1. Hours of Operations A FBO must provide Jet A and Avgas for aircraft fueling and line services seven (7) days per week, from 7:00 AM until at least 7 PM. Additionally, a FBO shall be open for aircraft maintenance and repair at least eight (8) hours per day, five (5) days per week. A FBO shall also be on-call twenty-four (24) hours per day with after-hours response times of one (1) hour or less. FBO must provide Aircraft line servicing as identified in paragraph 3. 2. Aviation fueling: (a) The FBO shall comply with the International Fire Ordinance, 2000 or later edition, as published by the International Ordinance Council, Inc., and as amended by the City Council for the City of Georgetown; FAA Advisory Circular 150/5230-4, as amended; all requirements of the Airport Ordinance; and all other applicable laws and regulations related to aircraft fuel handling, dispensing and storage. (b) The FBO shall not construct fuel storage. All fuel must be purchased from the City. (c) The FBO shall provide dispensing equipment sufficient to serve the needs of the aircraft frequenting the Airport, including the provision of at least one Jet A refueling Page 89 of 164 XXX/XX/2017 CO-4 vehicle and one Avgas refueling vehicle. Jet A refueling vehicles shall have single-point and over-the-wing fueling capabilities and a minimum capacity of 2,000 gallons. Avgas refueling vehicle shall have a minimum capacity of 500 gallons. An FBO shall arrange for back-up refueling vehicles (with the same capabilities and minimum capacities). All equipment must be inspected and approved by the Airport Manager prior to its use for Airport purposes. The metering devices shall be annually inspected, checked and certified by appropriate state agencies. The Airport Manager may inspect such equipment periodically to ensure compliance with all standards. (d) The FBO shall require all of its fuel-handling personnel to complete training courses, obtain a fuel handler’s certification, and receive periodic refresher training as required by FAA Advisory Circular 150/5230-4, the Georgetown Municipal Airport and City Fire Department. The Supervisory Training Program must be obtained by completing an FAA authorized Supervisory Fuel Safety training course. All employees who fuel aircraft or otherwise handle fuel must receive at least initial on-the-job training and recurrent instruction every 24 consecutive calendar months in fire safety from a trained supervisor. The City Fire Department, Airport Manager, TxDOT, and FAA may periodically inspect the FBO’s activities and personnel to ensure adherence to safe practices. (e) The FBO must develop a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for aviation fueling activities and submit for approval to the Airport Manager. The SOP must include a plan of action in case of a fuel spill. All fuel trucks/equipment must meet all applicable local and State codes and be approved for use by the local fire marshal and Airport management and meet the requirements of the latest edition of the National Fire Protection Association booklet, Manual 407 – “Standard for Airport Fuel Servicing, latest edition”, published by the National Fire Protection Association. Each mobile fuel vehicle must have a spill kit. (f) All mobile fuel trucks must be parked on a concrete surface. Page 90 of 164 XXX/XX/2017 CO-5 3. Aircraft line services: (a) The FBO shall employ and have on-duty during required hours of operation at least one properly trained and qualified employee capable of providing aircraft fueling, aircraft parking, and ancillary aircraft ground services and related customer services and support. (b) The FBO shall have and maintain the equipment that is required to safely and efficiently tow the aircraft frequenting the Airport, including a tug and tow bars with rated draw bar rating sufficient for such aircraft. (c) The FBO must have capability to remove disabled aircraft from any Airport movement surface or safety areas. (d) The FBO shall maintain tools, jacks, tugs, tire repair equipment, ground power units, emergency starting equipment, portable compressed air tanks, oxygen cart and supplies, fire extinguishers, chocks, lavatory-cart, ropes and tie-down supplies as are necessary for the servicing of aircraft types expected to use the Airport. 4. Aircraft Maintenance and Repair Services: The FBO shall provide or have a City approved sub-contractor for – (a) Airframe, engine and accessory repair services for piston, turboprop, and turbine Aircraft. (b) Sufficient shop space, equipment, and supplies for common repairs. (c) On-duty during normal business hours at least one person who is currently certified by the FAA with ratings appropriate to the work being performed and holds an airframe and power plant rating. (d) Retail sales of aircraft parts and accessories as are necessary for the servicing of aircraft types expected to use the Airport. (e) Oxygen servicing. 5. Concierge Services: The FBO must have Page 91 of 164 XXX/XX/2017 CO-6 (a) Available a minimum of one (1) courtesy car for customer services and support. (b) Agreements with rental car companies for customers who need these services. (c) A telephone for public use. (d) A pilot and passenger lounge with restrooms, coffee, and/or soft drinks. (e) Maintain a list of area FAR Part 135 Operators for air taxi and charter services. (f) Arrangements to provide aircraft detailing/cleaning services. (g) Arrangements to provide catering services to aircraft Operators. (h) Aircraft lavatory servicing. (i) Aircraft oxygen servicing. C. Subcontracting Services, Subleasing; Restrictions 1. The FBO may subcontract aircraft maintenance and repair services and the retail sale of aircraft parts and accessories, provided that such subcontractor meets the Specialized Aviation Services Operator (SASO) requirements of these Minimum Standards as stated therein and in such areas as are approved by the Airport Management. The subcontractor must be based on the Airport. 2. The FBO shall not sublease, permit or allow any other person to operate as a SASO within the FBO leased or permitted area, or to conduct any business venture, without the prior written approval of the City. D. General Requirements: The FBO is required to perform the following functions or abide by the following rules: 1. Make its business open to all forms and classes of Aeronautical Activity. 2. Properly dispose of any trash from the leased property. Page 92 of 164 XXX/XX/2017 CO-7 3. Obtain approval from the City before reducing any services included in the FBO’s agreement with the City. 4. Furnish all applicable services in a fair, equal, and nondiscriminatory manner to all Airport users. 5. Abide by any and all rules, requirements, or mandates placed upon the City by the FAA or the State of Texas, including, the Grant Assurances of FAA grants and the Terms and Conditions of the State of Texas grants. 6. Will not allow its personnel to conduct “Flagging or Hawking” of aircraft in an attempt to direct them to their location. 7. The FBO does not have the right to perform any service or business on the Airport unless such service or business is included in the current agreement with the City. 8. Surrender FBO rights, 60 days after written notice and failure to cure, if minimum requirements are not continually met. E. Fees to include Fuel Flowage Fees 1. The FBO shall pay the Airport Fuel Flowage Fees on all fuel (100LL, Jet A, Vehicle, Diesel etc.) dispensed on Airport property. 2. All payments due the Airport shall be made payable to the Airport and shall be delivered to the Airport Business Office. CO-4. Specialized Aviation Services Operator (SASO) No person may operate as a SASO unless that person has received and currently holds a currently valid written authorization from the City. In addition to the requirements of DB-6, a SASO must meet the following requirements: A. General Requirements. A SASO must meet the following general requirements and all requirements in CO-5 through CO-15 specific to each activity the SASO will conduct: 1. The entity must have: (a) A lease with sufficient and appropriate space to conduct the functions of the SASO as it has represented it will perform Page 93 of 164 XXX/XX/2017 CO-8 for a period of a minimum of 12 months for either leased Airport property or Airport property with City-owned facilities on it, said lease having been approved by the City Council. OR (b) A sublease from an FBO or another SASO with sufficient and appropriate space to conduct those functions as a SASO that the City has approved and shall set out in the written authorization. The sublease shall define the type of business and service to be offered by the sub-lessee SASO. The sub-lessee SASO shall meet all of the Minimum Standards established by the City for the categories of services to be furnished by the SASO. The Minimum Standards may be met in combination between lessee and sub-lessee. The sublease agreement shall specifically define those services to be provided by the lessee to the sub-lessee that shall be used to meet the standards. 2. A multiple services SASO engages in any two or more of the aeronautical services for which Minimum Standards have been herein provided. (a) The SASO shall comply with the aircraft requirements, including the equipment thereon for each aeronautical service to be performed except that multiple uses can be made of all aircraft owned or under lease by SASO. (b) The SASO shall obtain, as a minimum, insurance coverage, which is equal to the greater requirement for all individual aeronautical services being performed by SASO. (c) The SASO shall have in its employ, and on duty during the appropriate business hours, trained personnel in such numbers as are required to meet the Minimum Standards for each aeronautical service the SASO is performing as herein provided. Multiple responsibilities may be assigned to meet the personnel requirements for each aeronautical service being performed by the SASO. (d) The SASO providing three (3) or more services shall lease a sufficient number of aircraft tie-down spaces or hangar space to meet the combined needs of the operations proposed. Page 94 of 164 XXX/XX/2017 CO-9 CO-5. Aircraft Sales. All SASOs conducting Aircraft Sales must meet the following additional requirements: A. Lease or have access to a minimum of 100 square feet of office space. B. If dealing in Aircraft, maintain an approved Aircraft dealer’s certificate from the FAA. C. Ensure that all other fees and taxes applicable to the sale of Aircraft are paid to the appropriate parties. CO-6. Airframe, Engine and Accessory Maintenance and Repair Services: All SASOs conducting Airframe, Engine and Accessory Maintenance and Repair Services must meet the following additional requirements: A. Provide sufficient shop space, equipment, supplies and availability of parts equivalent to that required for approved FAA repairs. B. Employ and have on-duty during normal business hours at least one person who is currently certified by the FAA with ratings appropriate to the work being performed and who holds an Airframe and Power Plant rating. C. Conduct maintenance and repair operations, or business activities inside hangars or other structures designed for such activities. Specific lease agreement and/or fire codes shall determine what hangars other structures shall be approved for aircraft Maintenance and Repairs. D. Hangar space shall be leased for such SASOs operations. CO-7. Aircraft Leasing or Rental Services: All SASOs conducting Aircraft Leasing or Rental Services must meet the following additional requirements: A. Have use of appropriate office space; and B. Have at least one person on-duty during normal business hours. C. Maintain all required FAA licenses. CO-8. Flight Training Services: All SASOs conducting flight training services must: A. Have available for use in flight training, either owned or under written lease, an airworthy aircraft, which must be at least a two-place aircraft suitable for private pilot training. Page 95 of 164 XXX/XX/2017 CO-10 B. Employ at least one FAA Certified Flight Instructor to provide the type of training offered. C. Have use of appropriate office space and adequate classroom facilities either at the Airport or at such other off-Airport location as needed for proper operations of the flight training services for the amount and type of training involved. CO-9. Avionics, Instruments or Propeller Repair Services: All SASOs conducting Avionics, Instruments or Propeller Repair Services must: A. Hold the appropriate certificates issued by FAA for the types of equipment planned to repair, service and/or install. B. Employ and have on-duty during the appropriate business hours, at least one person who is currently certified by the FAA with ratings appropriate to the services offered. C. Conduct operations or business activities only inside hangars or other structures designed for such functions. Specific lease agreements and/or fire codes shall determine what hangars or other structures shall be approved for conducting repair services. CO-10. Aircraft Charter and Air Taxi Services: All SASOs conducting Aircraft Charter and Air Taxi Services must meet the following additional requirements: A. Have and provide to the Airport Manager appropriate and current FAR Part 135 Certificates or provisional FAR Part 135 Certificates. B. Own or lease exclusively by written agreement aircraft continuously airworthy. All aircraft shall meet the requirements of their FAA certificate and Operating Specifications Manual. C. Have adequate leased hangar space for each owned or leased aircraft. CO-11. Hangar Leasing Services: All SASOs conducting Hangar Leasing Services must: A. Lease sufficient land to accommodate the proposed number of hangars and/or T- Hangars based on the following: 1. Compliance with any applicable FAA Minimum Standards for the storage of Aircraft for Hangars and T- Hangars. 2. Compliance with requirements outlined in applicable NFPA guidelines. Page 96 of 164 XXX/XX/2017 CO-11 B. Register with the Airport Manager the Aircraft based at the Airport stored within the Operator’s Hangars or T- Hangars. CO-12. Specialized Commercial Flying Services: All SASOs conducting Specialized Commercial Flying Services must: A. Demonstrate availability of aircraft suitably equipped for the particular type of operation intended to perform. B. Have on-duty or on-call during normal business hours at least one person who holds a current commercial pilot license with appropriate ratings for the aircraft to be flown. C. Have adequate leased hangar space for each owned or leased aircraft. D. Have adequate leased office space for proper operation of the Commercial Flying Services. CO-13. Aerial Applicators: No person may use the Airport for loading, unloading, air frame/hopper/tank wash down, other than engine repair of any aircraft used to apply any insecticide, fungicide, rodenticide, or herbicide unless he first gets written permission from the City. The City shall not grant such a permit unless the applicant follows procedures for and obtains an SASO permit and, in addition, agrees to provide at its own expense a paved work area with adequate provisions to collect all debris, liquids, and other materials from such aircraft and deposit same in a container and dispose of same in a manner approved by the Federal Environmental Protection Agency, Texas Department of Health, Texas Commission of Environmental Quality, Texas Department of Water Resources, Texas Department of Agriculture, and code of ordinances and regulations of City of Georgetown and Williamson County. CO-14. Mobile Aircraft Washing Services: Aircraft washing is restricted to designated wash rack areas and/or other areas permitted under an approved Aircraft Washing Plan. All SASOs conducting Mobile Aircraft Washing Services must: A. Obtain approval of an Aircraft Washing Plan that contains the following information: 1. Name of individual/company conducting washing services, contact name and phone number. 2. A site map of the area in which washing will occur. The site map must contain the following: (a) An outline of the washing location to include location of runoff control structures. Page 97 of 164 XXX/XX/2017 CO-12 (b) Approximate distance (in feet) from washing area to nearest drain(s). (c) Reference to buildings, terminal, roads, etc. (d) North arrow. B. A detailed description of washing method/operation, including the following details: 1. Wash water containment method(s), (ramp scrubber, containment boom, dry, etc.). 2. Amount of water used per wash and frequency of operation. 3. Name, amount of chemical(s) used per wash. 4. If “dry” washing or waxing/coating operations are to be conducted provide affirmation that tarps will be used to collect residual material for its proper disposal and protect the ramp (if appropriate). C. Material safety data sheets (MSDS) for all chemicals to be used. D. The method of disposal of retrieved wash/waste water. If water is to be disposed of on Airport property the following steps must be taken: 1. Disposal of wash/waste water must be done through an oil/water interceptor in to the sanitary sewer system; and 2. Approval for the discharge of wash/waste water on Airport property must be obtained from the Airport Manager. The approval letter must be included in the final washing plan. CO-15. Mobile Aircraft Maintenance and Repair Services: All SASOs conducting Mobile Aircraft Maintenance and Repair Services must: A. Be currently certified by the FAA with ratings appropriate to the work being performed and who holds an Airframe, Power Plant, or Aircraft Inspector rating. B. Conduct all activities inside hangars or other structures designed for such functions. Specific lease agreement and fire codes shall determine what Page 98 of 164 XXX/XX/2017 CO-13 hangars or other structures shall be approved for Mobile Maintenance and Repairs. Page 99 of 164 XXX/XX/2017 LCA-1 SECTION 4 FLYING CLUBS Page 100 of 164 XXX/XX/2017 LCA-2 Section 4 – Flying Clubs FC-1. Standards. A Flying Club (“Club”) shall meet the following standards: A. At the time of applying for a lease, license, permit or agreement with or from the Advisory Board to operate at the Airport, the Club shall furnish the Airport Manager the following documents: 1. Copy of its documents of organization including list of members, and names of officers and managers 2. Evidence of required insurance 3. Description of all aircraft used 4. Evidence that such aircraft are properly certificated 5. Evidence of Ownership of such aircraft 6. Any operating rules of the Club B. All aircraft used by the Club shall be owned by the Club or leased exclusively by written agreement to the Club, and all Ownership or lease rights to such aircraft must be vested on a pro-rata basis in all of the Club’s members. The property rights of the Club members shall be equal, and no part of any revenues received by the Club shall inure to the direct benefit of any member (e.g., by salary or bonus). The Club shall not derive greater revenue from the use of its aircraft than the amount necessary for the operation, maintenance and replacement of its aircraft and facilities. C. The Club’s aircraft shall not be used by any person other than the Club’s members and shall not be used by any person for hire, charter or air taxi. Flight instruction to Club's members may be given in Club aircraft. D. The Club shall pay fees as prescribed by lease, license, permit or agreement, and any applicable fees identified on the Airport Rates and Fees schedule. Page 101 of 164 XXX/XX/2017 I-1 SECTION 5 INSURANCE Page 102 of 164 XXX/XX/2017 I-2 Section 5 – Insurance I-1. General Insurance Requirements. Each Aircraft Operator and Commercial Operator shall at all times maintain in effect the following types and minimum amounts of insurance as applicable to the business/operation to be conducted. All insurance shall be in a form and from an insurance company with a Best’s financial rating of at least B ++. All policies, except worker’s compensation policy, shall name the City/County and their elected or appointed officials, officers, representatives, managers, commissioners, agents and employees as “Additional Insureds,” and the Operator shall furnish to the Airport Manager certification of insurances evidencing the required coverage cited herein prior to engaging in any Airport activity. Such certificates shall provide for unequivocal 30 day notice to Airport Manager of cancellation, or material change of any policy limits or conditions. The Airport Manager may require that a complete copy of an insurance policy be submitted. Following notice of failure to provide required insurance, the City may cancel any license, permit, or agreement if the default is not cured within 14 days. I-2. Insurance on all Structures. At all times during the term of the lease of land on the Airport, the lessee, at its own expense, shall maintain insurance on all structures on the leased property at the Airport protecting the lessee and the owner, as their interests may appear, against loss of damage by fire, accident, wind storm, hail, explosion, or smoke. Should loss occur and lessee, for any reason, abandons the lease, all proceeds shall (except to the extent otherwise claimable by the structure’s mortgagee) become the property of the City. I-3. Schedule of Minimum Insurance Requirements: A. FIXED-BASED OPERATOR Commercial general aviation liability policy with $5,000,000 CSL coverage for premises, operations, and product liability. Products Completed Operations $1,000,000 CSL Hangar Keeper's Liability $5,000,000 CSL Personal Injury (including death) $1,000,000 CSL Aircraft liability, with coverage for bodily injury $1,000,000 CSL and property damage, including passengers. Page 103 of 164 XXX/XX/2017 I-3 B. SPECIALIZED AVIATION SERVICES OPERATOR Commercial general aviation liability policy with $2,000,000 CSL coverage for premises and operations. Aircraft liability, with coverage for bodily injury $1,000,000 CSL and property damage, including passengers. C. NON-COMMERCIAL FLYING CLUBS Commercial general aviation liability policy with $1,000,000 CSL coverage for premises and operations. Aircraft liability, with coverage for bodily injury $1,000,000 CSL and property damage, including passengers. D. ALL OTHER OPERATIONS/USERS General aviation liability policy with coverage $ 500,000 CSL for premises and operations. Note: CSL = Combined Single Limit I-4. Special Instructions. A. Any Aircraft Operator seeking to “self fuel,” as defined in FAA Advisory Circular 150/5190-6, shall have a minimum $1,000,000 CSL general liability policy that contains an endorsement specifically permitting self- fueling. B. Any Operator using service vehicles on the Airport premises in support of its operations shall maintain additional coverage of Motor Vehicle Liability in the amount of $500,000 CSL. I-5. Additional Insurance Required. In addition to the types and amounts of insurance required by this Article, each Operator shall at all times maintain such other insurance as the City may reasonably determine to be necessary for such Operator’s activities. Page 104 of 164 XXX/XX/2017 BIS-1 SECTION 6 BUILDING/IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS Page 105 of 164 XXX/XX/2017 BIS-2 Section 6 – Building/Improvement Standards BIS-1. Buildings and Structures. All buildings and structures owned or used by Operators on the Airport shall comply with state and local laws, codes and regulations. All buildings, structures and improvements must be maintained in a sound structural and mechanical condition throughout the term of use by Operator. BIS-2. Maintenance of the Airport. Each lessee of land or facilities on the Airport shall keep the leased area/facilities neat (appropriately painted where appropriate), trimmed, clean, free from any type of hazard of life, limb, or property, free from junk and debris, and in an aesthetically pleasing condition. Maintenance of areas not leased shall be the responsibility of the City. BIS-3. Buildings and Structures Standard. No person may construct, remodel, erect, or maintain any structure or shelter, either permanent or temporary, unless specifically authorized by the City. Except as noted hereinafter, in no event shall the City authorize construction, erection, or continued presence of a structure unless it is of permanent metal and/or masonry construction, paved floors, aesthetically pleasing, and at a minimum, meet building, fire, and other codes or standards applicable in the City and/or at the Airport. The City may waive this policy if determined that such action is necessary to provide a minimal level of service to Airport users. All asphalt pavement must be constructed to support the maximum weight of the aircraft planned for using the hangar location. BIS-4. Construction Process. Before commencing any improvements or modifications, the Operator must submit detailed construction plans and specifications to the City for approval. Operator must obtain City issued building permit. Operator must comply with all required building inspections. Upon completion of the construction, the Operator must obtain a City issued Certificate of Occupancy (CO) certificate and provide the City two (2) complete sets of detailed plans and specifications of the work as completed. Operator may not occupy or use improvement until CO has been issued. All improvements or modifications made to Airport property shall become the property of the Airport, at no cost to the Airport upon termination of the Operator’s lease, license, permit or agreement. Page 106 of 164 XXX/XX/2017 L-1 SECTION 7 LEASING Page 107 of 164 XXX/XX/2017 L-2 Section 7 – Leasing L-1. Conflicts in Lease. Should any portion of these Standards conflict with the conditions of any lease agreement executed by the City, the conditions in the executed lease agreement will control over these Standards for the remainder of the lease term or renewal thereof. L-2. Exclusive Rights. No person may be granted in fact or by written instrument any exclusive right in violation of the FAA Grant Assurances applicable to the Airport. Determination of the existence of a prohibited exclusive right lies within the exclusive jurisdiction of the FAA. If FAA determines any provision of a written instrument or a practice in fact constitutes a grant of a prohibitive exclusive right, such provision or grant shall be deemed void. L-3. Ground Lease Applications. A request shall be made to the Airport Manager, who will provide the applicant with instructions on the information that is needed to proceed with the request. The following shall be required for all applications to lease: A. Concept plan including preliminary sketches of construction and infrastructure build out. B. Timeline to complete the project. C. Intended aeronautical use of project, and a preliminary analysis of the project’s impact on Airport traffic and/or noise. D. Letter of Credit assuring financial capabilities. The Airport Manager will review the request for compliance with Airport Layout Plan, Airport Master Plan, Airport Ordinance, Airport Rules and Regulations, and Minimum Standards. The Airport Manager may at this time request changes to the proposed lease if above listed compliance are not met. After receipt of a completed request for a lease, the Airport Manager and potential lessee will present the lease proposal at the next scheduled Advisory Board meeting. The Advisory Board may defer the proposed lease to a future Advisory Board meeting if additional information or changes to the proposal are required. All lease proposals will be forwarded to the City Council meeting with a recommendation from the Advisory Board. Page 108 of 164 XXX/XX/2017 L-3 L-4. Fees Due from Operators at/on Airport. The following shall be due and payable to the City on the 5th business day of each calendar month for charges incurred during the calendar month next proceeding, as follows: A. Sums due under any leases of land or land with improvements. B. Sums due under any agreement granting operating rights at or from the Airport. L-5. Terminal Apron Leasing. No two or more related persons/entities (legally, by third degree of consanguinity or affinity, or otherwise) may be granted a lease or any portion thereof on the Terminal Apron or on all or substantially all the land contiguous thereto. Aircraft Operators may lease tie-down spots. L-6. Lease Cancellation/Reduction in Scope. Land leased on the Airport must be promptly, effectively, and reasonably fully utilized. Any person leasing vacant land on the Airport must commence construction of minimum facilities, as described in the lease with the City, no later than one year from the date of the lease agreement, provided however, that the City may grant such extensions as the City may deem necessary. The facilities shall be completed not later than one year after construction commences. Total Cancellation: If any lessee fails to promptly and effectively utilize any of the leased premises, City may lease the tract to another qualified person in accordance with procedures set out elsewhere herein. Partial Cancellation: If a lessee after such two year period (and any extension that may be granted by the City) is using only part of the area leased to him, the City may, or on receiving from an otherwise qualified person a bona fide firm offer to lease the unused portion, unilaterally reduce the lease to the area being actually used, provided, however, that in no event (except where lease is totally cancelled) will a FBO’s or a SASO’s lease be reduced below the minimum required acreage for such Operators. L-7. Lease Charges/ Escalation Clauses/Terms. All unimproved Airport property shall be leased at an amount per square foot, per year as set by the City. The term of each lease for use of unimproved Airport Page 109 of 164 XXX/XX/2017 L-4 property shall be set by City, not to exceed twenty (20) years with a ten (10) year option. L-8. Removal and Repair of Unairworthy Aircraft and Inoperable Vehicles. A. All aircraft, located anywhere on the Airport, must be either: (1) airworthy; or (2) undergoing necessary repairs or maintenance, by an FAA-approved license holder, calculated to render the aircraft airworthy within 60 days. The Airport Manager may send a written request for proof of airworthiness, including log entries, legible identification of inspection sign-offs, and records of last flight date, to the registered owner of an aircraft at the address on file with the FAA Registration Branch. An Aircraft Owner receiving such request must within 20 days: (1) provide proof of airworthiness; or (2) move the aircraft to an approved repair facility and submit to the Airport Manager a letter from such facility stating that repairs necessary to render the Aircraft airworthy are being undertaken and the estimated date of airworthiness. B. If an Aircraft Owner fails to respond appropriately within 30 days to an airworthiness enquiry letter sent under Section L-8(A), then the City may assess additional rent in the amount of $500 per day for each day beyond 30 days that the Aircraft remains at the Airport. C. If an Aircraft remains in an outdoor parking space for more than 60 days beyond expiration of the 30-day response period listed in Section L-8(B), the City may move such Aircraft to other hangered or outdoor parking area as it deems appropriate. Rent after such 60-day period shall be assessed at $1,000 per day. D. Amateur or kit-built aircraft, while under construction in an Airport hangar, shall not be subject to this Section L-8 provided that the hangar tenant and the aircraft owner have submitted to the Airport Manager an estimated construction schedule and submit every 6 months a construction progress report, as recommended in the FAA 2016 Policy on Non-Aeronautical Uses of Hangars. Page 110 of 164 XXX/XX/2017 A-1 APPENDIX A DEFINITIONS Page 111 of 164 XXX/XX/2017 A-2 Accident: A collision or other contact between any part of an aircraft or a vehicle, person, stationary object or other thing which results in property damage, personal injury, or death; or an entry into or emerging from a moving aircraft or vehicle by a person which results in personal injury or death to such person, or some other person, or which results in property damage. Advisory Board: City appointed board that makes recommendations to the City pertaining to Airport related matters. Advisory Circular (AC): FAA publications consisting of all non-regulatory material of a policy, guidance, and technical nature. Used as basic source for most Airport design criteria. Aeronautical Activity: Any activity or service conducted on Airport property, which involves, makes possible, or is required for the operation of aircraft, or contributes to, or is required for, the safety of such operations. Aeronautical Activities include, but are not limited to: • General and corporate aviation • Air taxi and charter operation • Aerial photography • Pilot training • Aircraft rental • Sightseeing • Aerial surveying • Crop dusting • Aircraft sales and service • Aviation fuel and oil sales (whether or not conducted in conjunction with other included activities) • Repair and maintenance of aircraft • Sale of aircraft parts • Aviation fire suppression • Aviation advertising • Aircraft management • Any other activities that, because of their direct relationship to the operation of aircraft can appropriately be regarded as an aeronautical activity. The following are non-aeronautical activities: • Ground transportation (taxis, car rentals, limousines) • Restaurants • In-flight food catering • Barber shops • Auto parking lots Air Traffic: Aircraft in operation anywhere in the air or, when under their own power, on the ground. Page 112 of 164 XXX/XX/2017 A-3 Aircraft: Means any device intended to fly in the air. Aircraft Charter and Air Taxi Services: An Air Charter or Air Taxi Operator engages in the business of providing air transportation (persons or property) to the general public for hire, on an basis under Code of Federal Regulations CFR 14 Part 135 of the Federal Aviation Regulations. Aircraft Fuel: Means all flammable substances expressly manufactured and blended for the purpose of operating an Aircraft engine. Aircraft Operator: Person in charge or command of an aircraft. The Aircraft Operator may, or may not be, the owner of the aircraft. Airport Layout Plan (ALP): An FAA/TxDOT approved set of drawings showing Airport boundaries, physical features and proposed additions to all areas owned or controlled by the sponsor for Airport purposes, the location and nature of existing and proposed Airport facilities and structures, and the location on the Airport of the existing and proposed non-aviation areas and improvements thereon. The drawings also show local airspace, approach areas and obstructions in the approach areas. Airport Master Plan (AMP): Presents a conception of the ultimate development of a specific Airport. It presents the research and logic from which the plan was evolved and displays the plan in a graphic and written report. Airport Rates and Charges: A schedule of fees approved by the City payable by users and Operators at the Airport. Airport Tenant: A person who leases or uses property at the Airport solely for the purpose of storing Based Aircraft, and who is not engaged in any Commercial Operation. Airside: The area of the Airport that is either contained within the Airport perimeter fence or which requires access through a building located on or adjacent to Airport property which requires access to a Airport surface such as runways, taxiways, or aprons. Airspace: Space in the air above the surface of the earth or a particular portion of such space, usually defined by the boundaries of an area on the surface projected upward. Air Traffic Pattern: The Air Traffic flow that is prescribed for aircraft landing at, taxiing on, or taking off from the Airport. Apron: A defined pavement area, intended to accommodate aircraft for purposes of loading or unloading passengers or cargo, servicing and parking. Page 113 of 164 XXX/XX/2017 A-4 Avionics, Instruments or Propeller Repair Services: A service that engages in the business of and provides a shop for the repair of aircraft avionics, propellers, instruments, and accessories for general aviation aircraft. This category may include the sale of new or used aircraft avionics, propellers, instruments, and accessories. Based Aircraft: Aircraft which the owner physically locates and domiciles at the Airport intending that it remain for an undetermined period, and which, whenever it is absent from the Airport, the owner intends to return it to the Airport. Building: Main portion of a structure, all projections or extensions there from, any changes or additions thereto, and shall include garages, outside platforms, docks, carports, canopies, eaves and porches. Building Area: An area on an Airport to be used, considered, or intended to be used, for Airport buildings or other Airport facilities or rights-of-way, together with all Airport buildings and facilities located thereon. City: The City of Georgetown, Texas and Owner of the Georgetown Municipal Airport. Commercial Operator: Person who provides goods or services at the Airport for compensation. Such activities are deemed “Commercial Operations.” An activity is considered Commercial Operation regardless of whether the business is non-profit, charitable, or tax exempt. FAA: Federal Aviation Administration. FAR: Federal Aviation Regulations. Flagging and/or Hawking: Any method or means used from any location to attract incoming aircraft for the purposes of selling fuel or providing other services (except the use of fixed signs if approved by the City). "Flagging" and/or "Hawking" is Prohibited on the Georgetown Municipal Airport. Flying Club: An entity or organization organized solely for the purpose of providing its members with one or more aircraft for their personal use and enjoyment. Fuel Flowage Fees: Fees levied by the City per gallon of aviation gasoline and jet fuel sold at the Airport. Hangar: Fully enclosed structure intended to house aircraft, either for purposes of storage, or while undergoing maintenance and repair. (See Shade Hangar) Hazardous Material: Hazardous or toxic substance, waste or material which is toxic, explosive, corrosive, flammable, infectious, radioactive, carcinogenic, mutagenic, teratogenic, or otherwise hazardous, and is or becomes regulated by any governmental authority, agency, Page 114 of 164 XXX/XX/2017 A-5 department, board, board, agency or instrumentality of the United States, the State of Texas or any political subdivision thereof. Improvements: All buildings, structures and facilities, including pavement, fencing, signs and landscaping, constructed, installed or placed on, under or above any leased area by or with the concurrence of a lessee. Landing Area: Any locality, either on land or water, including Airports, heliports and STOL (Short Take-Off and Landing) ports, which is used or intended to be used for the landing and takeoff or surface maneuvering of aircraft, whether or not facilities are provided for the shelter, servicing, or repair of aircraft, or for receiving or discharging of passengers or cargo. Landside: The general public common use areas of the Airport such as public roadways, parking lots and buildings. Lease: A written agreement between the City and a person granting permission to use Airport land and/or buildings, and/or authorizing the conduct of specified activities. Line Service: The general pre-flight or post-flight dispensing of aviation fuel, checking aircraft engine oil, adding aircraft engine oil, windshield cleaning, etc. conducted at an FBO area by line personnel dispensing fuel from a truck designed for such purposes. Non-Commercial Operators: A person or entity that neither offers nor provides goods or services to the public for compensation. Operator: Any person conducting Aeronautical Activity at the Airport. Person: An individual; a corporation, firm, partnership, association, organization, agency, and any other group or entity acting as a unit; the state, county, and/or political subdivision of the state, or other governmental entity. Person also includes a trustee, receiver, assignee or similar representative. Ramp: Paved area suitable for aircraft parking. Repair Facility: Facility utilized for the repair of aircraft to include airframe, power plant, propellers, radios, instruments and accessories. Such facility will be operated in accordance with pertinent local, state and FAA regulations. Roadway: Any street or road whether improved or unimproved, within the boundaries of the Airport and set aside or designated for use by vehicles, whether dedicated or not. Runway: Segments of land at the Airport prepared and marked for use by aircraft in taking-off and landing. Page 115 of 164 XXX/XX/2017 A-6 Specialized Aviation Services Operator (SASO): A person offering one or more specialized aeronautical services at the Airport, including without limitation the following activities: 1. Aircraft / Helicopter Sales 2. Airframe, Engine and Accessory Maintenance and Repair 3. Aircraft Leasing or Rental Services 4. Flight Training Services 5. Avionics, Instruments or Propeller Repair Services 6. Aircraft Charter and Air Taxi Services 7. Hangar Leasing Services 8. Specialized Commercial Flying Services 9. Aerial Applicators 10. Mobile Aircraft Washing Services 11. Mobile Aircraft Maintenance and Repair Services Specialized Commercial Flying Services: A Specialized Commercial Flying Services Operator engages in air transportation for hire for the purpose of providing the use of aircraft for the following activities: 1. Non-stop sightseeing flights that begin and end at the same Airport 2. Aerial advertising 3. Aerial photography or survey 4. Power line or pipeline patrol 5. Fire fighting 6. Any other operations specifically excluded from FAR Part 135 of the Federal Aviation Regulations Sublease: Lease granted by a lessee, only with permission from the City, to another entity for all or part of the leased property. Taxilane: Portion of the Airport apron area, or any other area, used for access between taxiways and aircraft parking and storage areas. Taxiway: Defined path established for the taxiing of aircraft from one part of the Airport to another. Taxiway Safety Area: A cleared, drained, and graded area, symmetrically located about the extended taxiway centerline and adjacent to the end of the taxiway safety area. Terminal Apron: The paved or surface-treated area adjacent to the terminal building reserved for use by itinerant aircraft, also for aircraft refueling, or the loading or unloading of passengers or cargo, and includes that portion of the parking apron reserved for aircraft owners leasing space from the City for month to month parking. Terminal: Airport Building with both Airside and Landside access for aircraft Operators and passengers. The Terminal provides restrooms, lounge area, conference area and is the location of the Airport Manager’s Office. Page 116 of 164 XXX/XX/2017 A-7 Tie-Down: Area within an open-air aircraft parking or storage area where aircraft may be secured to the ground, either by use of fixed tie-down points, or by use of moveable anchors. Transient Aircraft: Aircraft that is not a Based Aircraft at the Airport. T-hangar: An aircraft hangar in which aircraft are parked alternately tail to tail, each in the T- shaped space left by the other row of aircraft or aircraft compartments. Page 117 of 164 XXX/XX/2017 B-1 APPENDIX B BUSINESS APPLICATION Page 118 of 164 XXX/XX/2017 B-2 GEORGETOWN MUNICIPAL AIRPORT AERONAUTICAL BUSINESS APPLICATION and PERMIT (Required to conduct commercial aeronautical activity on the Airport) Business or activity to be conducted (Check all that apply): ____ Fixed-Based Operator ____ Aircraft Charter and Air Taxi Services ____ Aircraft Sales ____ Hangar Leasing Services ____ Airframe, Engine and Accessory Maintenance and Repair Services ____ Specialized Commercial Flying Services Aircraft Leasing or Rental Services ____ Aerial Applicators ____ Flight Training Services ____ Mobile Aircraft Washing Services ____ Avionics, Instruments or Propeller Repair Services ____ Mobile Aircraft Maintenance and Repair Services ____ Other These activities are limited to the Airport by ordinance. Please refer to the Airport Minimum Standards for further information on each type of business. Applicant: ____________________________________________________________________ Authorized Representative: _______________________________________________________ Title: ________________________________________________________________________ Business Address: ______________________________________________________________ City, State, Zip: ________________________________________________________________ Billing Address: ________________________________________________________________ City, State, Zip: ________________________________________________________________ Phone: (work): __________________ (fax:): _______________ (emergency): ______________ The Applicant hereby requests the above action(s) from the City for the privilege of conducting Commercial Aeronautical Activities on the Airport. Each FBO application must include a Business Plan and Financial Package. The Business Plan must include information on how the applicant plans to provide required services. The Financial Package must include a list of individuals/parties with a material interest in the business as well Page 119 of 164 XXX/XX/2017 B-3 as demonstrate the capital necessary to support the required operations of the business desiring to operate as an FBO on the Airport. The undersigned representative certifies they are authorized to sign for the business and acknowledges receipt of a copy of this permit. Authorized Representative’s Signature Date Signed _______________ ______________________________ City Approval Date Signed _______________ _______________________________ Page 120 of 164 City of Georgetown, Texas Transportation Advisory Board July 14, 2017 SUBJECT: Cons id eration and recommend ation on Tas k Order SBE-17-001 with Steger Bizzell o f Georgetown, TX in the amount of $101,687.00 for 2017 Drainage Imp ro vements - Wesley Wright, P.E., Sys tems Engineering Direc tor ITEM SUMMARY: The p ro p o s ed tas k order will p ro vide s urvey, des ign, and /or b id d ing servic es for the following projec ts: Roc k Street Water Quality P o nd Rehab ilitation - T he existing water q uality pond has outlived its us eful life and needs a c omplete rehab . The projec t will improve the p o nds acc es s ibility, enhanc e its ability to treat s torm water runo ff, and inc reas e its treatment c ap acity to inc lude ad d itional imp ervious c o ver that could res ult from additio nal d o wntown red evelopment. 18th & Hutto Drainage S tud y - Multiple homes and roadways have proven s ub ject to flooding o n multip le o cc as io ns. This area is a relatively s mall drainage bas in and is not includ ed as part of the ongoing Texas Water Development Bo ard F lo o d Prevention Study. T he s cope o f this work is to s tudy the area, id entify the c ause o f the flooding, and present p o tential mitigatio n meas ures fo r future c ons id eration. College & 20th Improvements - This p ro ject was d es igned us ing prior year (F Y16) CIP fund s and is ready to b id . The s c ope inc luded with this tas k order will p ro vide b id d ing and c ons tructio n p hase s ervic es . The p ro ject will be bid this s ummer. Serenad a Culverts - Multip le c ulverts have weathered and b een d amaged over the years in the City of Geo rgeto wn p o rtion of Serenad a. The sc ope o f the task order will p ut to gether a d etailed b id pac kage for nec es s ary improvements here. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The cost for profes s ional services as s o ciated with thes e four projec ts is $101,687.00. Funds are available in the c urrent year Drainage CIP Bud get. SUBMITTED BY: Wes ley Wright ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Tas k Order SBE-17-001 Backup Material Page 121 of 164 TASK ORDER Georgetown – Revised 3.11 EJCDC E-505 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Engineer Professional Services—Task Order Edition Copyright ©2004 National Society of Professional Engineers for EJCDC. All rights reserved. Attachment 1 – Task Order Form Page 1 of 4 Task Order In accordance with paragraph 1.01 of the Master Services Agreement between Owner and Steger Bizzell (“Engineer”) for Professional Services – Task Order Edition, dated April 11, 2016 ("Agreement"), Owner and Engineer agree as follows: 1. Specific Project Data A. Title: 2017 Drainage Improvements B. Description: Professional engineering and surveying services relating to various projects in the city limits of Georgetown, such as “Rock Street Water Quality Pond Rehabilitation”, “18th Street Feasibility Study”, “College Street at 20th Street Improvements”, and “Serenada Drainage Improvements”. C. City of Georgetown Project Number: ________ D. City of Georgetown General Ledger Account No.: _________________ E. City of Georgetown Purchase Order No.: _______________________________ F. Master Services Agreement, Contract Number: 2016-729-MSA____________ 2. Services of Engineer See the attached Scope of Services for a detailed description of services to be provided to Owner by Engineer. 3. Owner's Responsibilities Owner shall have those responsibilities set forth in the Agreement subject to the following: • Provide timely review comments to plan reviews and project scope changes. • Provide Agent Authorization as necessary to submit agency documentation. • Estimated third-party fees for this project are listed below, and are not included in the compensation amount detailed in Section 5. The City shall be responsible for all permitting and third-party review fees. o TCEQ WPAP Modification, <1 acre ($3,000) 4. Times for Rendering Services Engineer shall perform the work stated above according to the schedule below. Durations are from the date of Notice to Proceed from Owner, or the previous phase, as appropriate. Durations may be concurrent. See the Scope of Services for more information. Task Order No. SBE-17-001 consisting of 23 pages. Page 122 of 164 TASK ORDER Georgetown – Revised 3.11 EJCDC E-505 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Engineer Professional Services—Task Order Edition Copyright ©2004 National Society of Professional Engineers for EJCDC. All rights reserved. Attachment 1 – Task Order Form Page 2 of 4 Phase Duration Rock Street WQ Pond Rehab Surveying Phase Design Phase (incl. TCEQ Coordination) 18th Street Feasibility Study Feasibility Study Phase College @ 20th Improvements Bidding Phase Services Construction Phase Services Serenada Drainage Improvements Survey & Design Phase Bidding Phase Services Construction Phase Services Eight (8) Weeks Twenty-Five (25) Weeks Eight (8) Weeks Six (6) Weeks Twelve (12) Weeks Eight (8) Weeks Six (6) Weeks Four (4) Weeks 5. Payments to Engineer A. Owner shall pay Engineer for services rendered as follows: Category of Services Compensation Method Lump Sum or Not to Exceed Amount of Compensation for Services Rock Street WQ Pond Rehab Lump Sum $36,115 18th Street Feasibility Study Lump Sum $22,023 College @ 20th Improvements Lump Sum $14,649 Serenada Drainage Improvements Lump Sum $28,900 All Services $101,687 B. The terms of payment are set forth in Article 4 of the Agreement unless modified in this Task Order. 6. Consultants: Prime consultant is Steger Bizzell. Geologic assessment services are anticipated to be provided by Texas Land Surveying, Inc. 7. Other Modifications to Agreement: None. Page 123 of 164 TASK ORDER Georgetown – Revised 3.11 EJCDC E-505 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Engineer Professional Services—Task Order Edition Copyright ©2004 National Society of Professional Engineers for EJCDC. All rights reserved. Attachment 1 – Task Order Form Page 3 of 4 8. Attachments: Rock Street WQ Pond Rehab Attachment "A1" – Project Location Map Attachment "B1" – Scope of Services Attachment "C1" – Estimated Fee Schedule 18th Street Feasibility Study Attachment "A2" – Project Location Map Attachment "B2" – Scope of Services Attachment "C2" – Estimated Fee Schedule College @ 20th Improvements Attachment "A3" – Project Location Map Attachment "B3" – Scope of Services Attachment "C3" – Estimated Fee Schedule Serenda Drainage Improvements Attachment "A4" – Project Location Map Attachment "B4" – Scope of Services Attachment "C4" – Estimated Fee Schedule Attachment "D" – Rate Schedule 9. Documents Incorporated By Reference: The Agreement effective April 11, 2016. Page 124 of 164 TASK ORDER Georgetown – Revised 3.11 EJCDC E-505 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Engineer Professional Services—Task Order Edition Copyright ©2004 National Society of Professional Engineers for EJCDC. All rights reserved. Attachment 1 – Task Order Form Page 4 of 4 Terms and Conditions: Execution of this Task Order by Owner and Engineer shall make it subject to the terms and conditions of the Agreement (as modified above), which Agreement is incorporated by this reference. Engineer is authorized to begin performance upon its receipt of a copy of this Task Order signed by Owner. The Effective Date of this Task Order is ________________________, 2017. OWNER: ENGINEER: By: By: Name: Dale Ross Name: Patrick J. Stevens, RPLS Title: Mayor Title:Vice-President Engineer License or Firm’s Certificate No. F-181 State of:Texas Date: Date: ATTEST: ____________________________________ Shelley Nowling, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM ONLY BY CITY ATTORNEY AND BY CITY COUNCIL MARCH 8, 2011, AGENDA ITEM “P” APPROVED AS TO FORM VERIFIED: _________________________________________ Nicole Abrego, Buyer Page 125 of 164 TASK ORDER Georgetown – Revised 3.11 EJCDC E-505 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Engineer Professional Services—Task Order Edition Copyright ©2004 National Society of Professional Engineers for EJCDC. All rights reserved. Attachment 1 – Task Order Form Page 5 of 4 DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE FOR TASK ORDER: DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE FOR TASK ORDER: Name: Mark Miller Name: Ben Lake, P.E. Title: Transportation Services Manager Title: Project Manager Address: 300-1 Industrial Ave. Georgetown, TX 78626 Address: 1978 S. Austin Ave. Georgetown, TX 78626 E-Mail Address: mark.miller@georgetown.org E-Mail Address: blake@stegerbizzell.com Phone: 512-930-2576 Phone: 512-930-9412 Fax: 512-930-3559 Fax: n/a Page 126 of 164 At t a c h m e n t A 1 Pr o j e c t L o c a t i o n M a p Ro c k S t r e e t W Q P o n d R e h a b 30 0 f t N➤➤N © 2 0 1 7 G o o g l e © 2 0 1 7 G o o g l e © 2 0 1 7 G o o g l e Page 127 of 164 Prepared by: June 22, 2017 1/2 Attachment B1 Additional Scope of Services Task Order No. SBE-17-001 Rock Street Water Quality Pond Rehabilitation 1. General Description of Amendment: Surveying, design, plan preparation, and permitting for rehabilitation to the existing water quality pond located west of Rock Street and 2nd Street. 2. Design Phase Services: This phase of the project will commence after the City has signed and executed this Task Order Amendment. One major plan review submittal and subsequent design revisions is included in this scope of work. The basic services for this phase include: a. Obtain and review related project data, reports and studies from the City such as the 2006 Downtown Overlay District Water Quality Master Plan and original Water Pollution Abatement Plan. Additional fees will apply if Steger Bizzell must obtain these files from other sources. b. Conduct a pre-design conference with City staff to establish basic project criteria including, but not limited to TCEQ requirements, rehabilitation strategies, maintenance requirements, project schedule (design & construction), etc. c. Coordinate with TCEQ staff on permitting requirements such as compliance with current design criteria, water quality treatment during the construction phase, and on-going maintenance issues in order to determine appropriate best management practices to meet TCEQ requirements. Engineer will determine an allowable impervious cover of the pond’s drainage basin based on the selected BMP and either an 80% TSS removal rate or an 85% TSS removal rate. The City shall determine which removal rate applies to this project. d. Prepare construction drawings and specifications for the rehabilitation or reconstruction of the pond in accordance with the latest City of Georgetown Construction Specifications and generally accepted engineering practices. e. Utilize survey and City data to identify potential conflicts with existing utilities. Every reasonable effort will be made to avoid conflicts with above-ground utilities. f. Submit plans to City staff for review. Modify plans based on comments received. This scope excludes addressing comments from City departments other than Transportation. g. Prepare and submit a Water Pollution Abatement Plan Modification to TCEQ. The submittal fee (estimated to be $3,000) shall be paid directly by the City of Georgetown. This Task Order assumes that a new Geologic Assessment will not be required by TCEQ or the City. h. Prepare construction contract documents for review and approval by the the City. The most recent version of the City's standard construction contract documents shall be used. These may include contract agreement forms, general conditions and supplementary conditions, invitations to bid, instructions to bidders, insurance and bonding requirements, and preparation of other contract-related documents. Page 128 of 164 Prepared by: June 22, 2017 2/2 3. Surveying Services: This phase of the project will occur concurrently with the Design Phase. The basic services for this phase include: a. Topographic Surveying i. Conduct pre-field operations (Texas811, OneCall) ii. Perform topographic field surveying iii. Office-process, draft, DTM iv. Perform internal QA/QC 4. Reimbursables: Reimbursable expenses not included in the stated compensation amount and will be billed to Client at Engineer’s cost. Reimbursable expenses may include, but are not limited to: postage or other delivery charges, document reproductions, third-party contractors or consultants (if applicable), and third-party fees listed above (if any) that are greater than anticipated. 5. Exclusions: The following services are specifically excluded from this Task Order Amendment. Some of these services or portions thereof are included in the original Task Order and subsequent Amendments: a. Utility relocation design b. Surveying of subsurface utilities, except where uncovered by others c. Underground storm sewer design d. Parking lot design e. Geotechnical investigation f. Geologic Assessment g. Construction Inspection h. Boundary survey or property owner determination (The City shall provide copies of agreements that show property owners and boundaries.) i. Right-of-way or easement acquisition, including preparation of field notes and legal descriptions j. Public Involvement (meetings with landowners, etc.) k. Coordination of materials testing services (typically provided by Contractor) l. Work in any area outside of the Project Limits m. Compliance with the Downtown Overlay design criteria n. TDLR review & inspection (no pedestrian elements proposed) o. Bidding & Construction Phase services p. TCEQ archive reproduction (The City shall provide a copy of the Downtown Water Quality Master Plan WPAP – EAPP ID # 04062201A.) Page 129 of 164 Pr e p a r e d b y At t a c h m e n t C 1 - E s t i m a t e d F e e S c h e d u l e Ta s k O r d e r S B E - 1 7 - 0 0 1 Ro c k S t r e e t W a t e r Q u a l i t y P o n d R e h a b i l i t a t i o n 6/ 2 1 / 2 0 1 7 Es t i m a t e d F e e S c h e d u l e Ta s k a n d D e s c r i p t i o n En g i n e e r (P r i n c i p a l ) Se n i o r En g i n e e r En g i n e e r (P E ) Re g i s t e r e d Su r v e y o r En g i n e e r in T r a i n i n g Se n i o r Te c h n i c i a n 2- M a n Su r v e y To t a l Es t i m a t e Ho u r l y R a t e : 23 3 2 1 6 1 6 1 1 3 4 1 3 3 1 2 8 1 6 0 De s i g n P h a s e 1. O b t a i n r e l a t e d d a t a , p l a t s , p l a n s , s t u d i e s a n d r e p o r t s 2 6 1, 1 2 0 2. P r e - d e s i g n c o n f e r e n c e 4 8 1, 7 0 8 3. T C E Q c o o r d i n a t i o n 4 8 20 4, 8 1 2 4. P r e p a r e c o n s t r u c t i o n d r a w i n g s a n d s p e c s 2 4 2 4 80 15 , 8 3 4 5. U t i l i t y c o n f l i c t a s s e s s m e n t 1 4 69 3 6. C i t y r e v i e w a n d r e v i s i o n s 4 20 3, 3 0 4 7. P r e p a r e a n d s u b m i t W P A P M o d i f i c a t i o n 2 8 24 4, 9 1 2 8. P r e p a r e c o n s t r u c t i o n c o n t r a c t d o c u m e n t s 1 2 8 1, 6 0 2 Su b t o t a l H o u r s : 2 1 1 5 3 0 1 7 0 0 0 2 3 6 Su b t o t a l F e e s : $ 4 6 6 $ 2 , 3 7 6 $ 8 , 5 3 3 $ 0 $ 2 2 , 6 1 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 3 3 , 9 8 5 To p o g r a p h i c S u r v e y i n g P h a s e 1. P r e f i e l d ( T e x a s 8 1 1 , O n e C a l l ) 1 1 26 2 2. F i e l d - T o p o 6 9 6 0 3. O f f i c e - p r o c e s s , d r a f t , D T M 1 4 64 6 4. Q A / Q C 1 1 26 2 Su b t o t a l H o u r s : 00 0 3 0 6 6 1 5 Su b t o t a l F e e s : $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 4 0 2 $ 0 $ 7 6 8 $ 9 6 0 $ 2 , 1 3 0 TO T A L H O U R S : 2 1 1 5 3 3 1 7 0 6 6 2 5 1 TO T A L F E E S : $ 4 6 6 $ 2 , 3 7 6 $ 8 , 5 3 3 $ 4 0 2 $ 2 2 , 6 1 0 $ 7 6 8 $ 9 6 0 $ 3 6 , 1 1 5 Pa g e 1 o f 1 Page 130 of 164 At t a c h m e n t A 2 Pr o j e c t L o c a t i o n M a p 18 t h S t r e e t F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y 70 0 f t N➤➤N © 2 0 1 7 G o o g l e © 2 0 1 7 G o o g l e © 2 0 1 7 G o o g l e Page 131 of 164 Prepared by: June 21, 2017 1/2 Attachment B2 Scope of Services Task Order No. SBE-17-001 18th Street Feasibility Study 1. General Description of Project: The proposed project will study and select appropriate drainage improvements in southeast Old Town Georgetown, specifically a portion of that land referred to as the Nolen Addition. The approximate study limits are depicted on the Project Location Map as Attachment A. Localized flooding of private property in this area has occurred due to limited conveyance capacity of the streets and high flow volumes along Hutto Road. This scope of services generally includes studying, evaluating, and costing possible drainage improvement alternatives. 2. Design Services: This phase of the project will commence after the City has signed and executed this Task Order. The basic services for this phase include: a. Identify and collect relevant plans, data, and reports pertinent to this project. b. Create a CAD base map that depicts approximate buried utility locations (provided by others), approximate right-of-way, 2-ft City of Georgetown contours, 2015 HPIDS 6” imagery, and other elements relevant to this project. c. Perform a detailed drainage study of the study limits. i. Delineate basin boundaries based on 2-ft contours and verified by site visit(s). Calculate runoff rates for 10, 25, and 100-year storms in accordance with the City of Georgetown Drainage Criteria Manual. ii. Prepare a detailed Drainage Study that documents the methodologies, inputs, and outputs calculated. This study will be incorporated into the hydraulic model of the proposed improvements described below. d. Prepare two conceptual drainage improvement designs that would address known flooding of existing residential structures. One conceptual design would employ a new storm sewer network. Each design would be supported by a hydraulic model or calculations and an exhibit that show how the improvements address flooding. Review the designs with City staff and incorporate any review comments. e. Prepare quantity take-offs and an opinion of probable construction cost. 3. Exclusions: The following services are specifically excluded from this Task Order. Steger Bizzell would be pleased to provide an additional fee estimate to provide these services. a. Utility potholing or other markings/identification b. Utility extension design c. TDLR coordination (no proposed pedestrian facilities) d. TCEQ coordination (provided by separate Task Order) e. Geologic Assessment f. Right-of-entry authorization (private property access is not anticipated) g. Topographic/field survey Page 132 of 164 Prepared by: June 21, 2017 2/2 h. Property/boundary survey (all work constrained to ROW or TCE) i. Environmental documentation or permitting (will be provided by City, if required) j. Coordination of materials testing services (typically provided by Contractor) k. Construction staking l. Right-of-way or easement acquisition, including preparation of field notes and legal descriptions m. Geotechnical investigation n. Construction plans preparation o. Bidding and Construction Phase Services 4. Reimbursables: Reimbursable expenses are not included in the stated compensation amount and will be billed to Client at Engineer’s cost. Reimbursable expenses may include, but are not limited to: postage or other delivery charges, document reproductions, third-party contractors or consultants (if applicable), and third-party fees listed above (if any) that are greater than anticipated. Page 133 of 164 Pr e p a r e d b y At t a c h m e n t C 2 Ta s k O r d e r S B E - 1 7 - 0 0 1 18 t h S t r e e t F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y Pr i n t e d : 6 / 2 1 / 2 0 1 7 Es t i m a t e d F e e S c h e d u l e Ta s k a n d D e s c r i p t i o n Se n i o r En g i n e e r En g i n e e r (P E ) Re g i s t e r e d Su r v e y o r En g i n e e r in T r a i n i n g Cl e r i c a l CA D D Te c h . 2- M a n Su r v e y Su b s , M i s c . Fe e s , e t c . To t a l Es t i m a t e Ho u r l y R a t e : 21 6 1 6 1 1 3 4 1 3 3 7 2 1 0 0 1 6 0 De s i g n S e r v i c e s ( 1 8 t h @ H u t t o ) 1. C o l l e c t d a t a , r e p o r t s 2 2 46 6 2. C r e a t e C A D b a s e m a p 6 2 99 8 3. S i t e v i s i t s 4 4 1, 1 7 6 4. P r e p a r e D e t a i l e d D r a i n a g e S t u d y 8 16 3, 4 1 6 5. P r e p a r e h y d r a u l i c m o d e l & 2 d e s i g n o p t i o n s 40 40 11 , 7 6 0 6. P r e p a r e f i n a l e x h i b i t 2 20 2, 9 8 2 7. Q u a n t i t y t a k e - o f f s a n d o p i n i o n o f p r o b a b l e c o s t 1 8 1, 2 2 5 TO T A L H O U R S : 0 5 5 0 9 6 0 4 0 15 5 TO T A L F E E S : $ 0 $ 8 , 8 5 5 $0 $ 1 2 , 7 6 8 $ 0 $ 4 0 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 2 2 , 0 2 3 To t a l L u m p S u m C o m p e n s a t i o n : $ 2 2 , 0 2 3 Pa g e 1 o f 1 Page 134 of 164 At t a c h m e n t A 3 Pr o j e c t L o c a t i o n M a p Co l l e g e @ 2 0 t h I m p r o v e m e n t s 40 0 f t N➤➤N © 2 0 1 7 G o o g l e © 2 0 1 7 G o o g l e © 2 0 1 7 G o o g l e Page 135 of 164 Prepared by: June 22, 2017 1/2 Attachment B3 Scope of Services Task Order No. SBE-17-001 College Street at 20th Street Improvements 1. General Description of Project: The proposed project encompasses street and drainage improvements in the vicinity of the intersection of College Street and 20th Street in Georgetown, Texas. Both streets are to be extended from their current termini to their intersection with each other near the existing Georgetown Railroad tracks. The proposed street width will be approximately 21 feet (back-of-curb to back-of- curb) to provide enough space for the required vegetative filter strip on one side. Surface drainage from the street and local area will be conveyed to a proposed culvert under the railroad bed. Flow will be conveyed approximately 300 feet to the southwest to an existing drainage channel. The project also includes curb and drainage improvements to Church Street from 19th Street to 20th Street. Any reference to “College Street at 20th Street” shall be assumed to include the ancillary work on Church Street. This scope of services generally includes providing bidding and construction phase administration services. 2. Bidding Phase Services: This phase of the project will provide bidding phase services for the previously designed College Street and 20th Street Project. It will commence after the Owner has signed and executed this Task Order. The basic services for this phase include: a. Assist Owner in advertising for and obtaining bids for the construction contract for the College Street and 20th Street project. b. Respond to questions from prospective Bidders. c. Issue addenda as appropriate to interpret, clarify, or expand the bidding documents d. If required, attend the GTAB and Council meetings where the construction contract is considered to assist in answering any questions regarding the recommendation of award. 3. Construction Phase Administration Services: This phase of the project will provide construction phase administration services for the previously designed College Street and 20th Street Project. It will commence after the Owner has awarded and executed a construction contract. The basic services for this phase include: a. Attend and conduct one pre-construction conference. b. Review shop drawings and submittals turned in by the contractor for compliance with design concepts. c. Review contractor pay requests and provide concurrence for City review and payment. d. Issue necessary interpretation and clarifications of the contract documents, prepare change orders and make recommendations to the acceptability of the work, as required. This scope is limited to two (2) change orders. Page 136 of 164 Prepared by: June 22, 2017 2/2 e. Conduct site visits periodically during construction and at the request of the City. This scope is limited to 8 hours. f. Conduct final walk-through with City staff and prepare punch-list items to be addressed/corrected by Contractor. g. Prepare record drawings based on information provided by the contractor, by utilizing Adobe Acrobat or similar software to digitize markups "on top" of approved plans. 4. Exclusions: The following services are specifically excluded from this Task Order. Steger Bizzell would be pleased to provide an additional fee estimate to provide these services. a. Construction Plan preparation or revisions b. Utility potholing or other markings/identification c. Utility extension design d. TDLR coordination (no proposed pedestrian facilities) e. TCEQ coordination (provided by separate Task Order) f. Geologic Assessment g. Right-of-entry authorization (private property access is not anticipated) h. Topographic/field survey i. Property/boundary survey (all work constrained to ROW or TCE) j. Environmental documentation or permitting (will be provided by City, if required) k. Coordination of materials testing services (typically provided by Contractor) l. Construction staking m. Right-of-way or easement acquisition, including preparation of field notes and legal descriptions n. Geotechnical investigation o. Construction plans preparation 5. Reimbursables: Reimbursable expenses are not included in the stated compensation amount and will be billed to Client at Engineer’s cost. Reimbursable expenses may include, but are not limited to: postage or other delivery charges, document reproductions, third-party contractors or consultants (if applicable), and third-party fees listed above (if any) that are greater than anticipated. Page 137 of 164 Pr e p a r e d b y At t a c h m e n t C 3 Ta s k O r d e r S B E - 1 7 - 0 0 1 Co l l e g e S t a t 2 0 t h S t I m p r o v e m e n t s Pr i n t e d : 3 / 2 8 / 2 0 1 7 Es t i m a t e d F e e S c h e d u l e Ta s k a n d D e s c r i p t i o n Se n i o r En g i n e e r En g i n e e r (P E ) Re g i s t e r e d Su r v e y o r En g i n e e r in T r a i n i n g Cl e r i c a l CA D D Te c h . 2- M a n Su r v e y Su b s , M i s c . Fe e s , e t c . To t a l Es t i m a t e Ho u r l y R a t e : 21 6 1 6 1 1 3 4 1 3 3 7 2 1 0 0 1 6 0 Bi d d i n g P h a s e S e r v i c e s 1. B i d a d v e r t i s e m e n t a n d m a n a g e m e n t 4 8 1 1, 7 8 0 2. P r e - b i d m e e t i n g , b i d o p e n i n g , a n d b i d t a b u l a t i o n 3 4 2 1, 1 5 9 3. B i d d e r r e s e a r c h a n d a w a r d r e c o m m e n d a t i o n 12 53 8 4. A s s i s t w i t h a w a r d p r o c e d u r e s 1 4 69 3 5. A t t e n d C o u n c i l 4 64 4 Su b t o t a l H o u r s : 1 1 4 0 1 6 3 0 0 34 Su b t o t a l F e e s : $ 2 1 6 $ 2 , 2 5 4 $0 $ 2 , 1 2 8 $ 2 1 6 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 4 , 8 1 4 Co n s t r u c t i o n P h a s e A d m i n . S e r v i c e s 1. P r e - c o n s t r u c t i o n c o n f e r e n c e 4 4 1, 1 7 6 2. R e v i e w p a y r e q u e s t s , R F I s , & s u b m i t t a l s 8 8 2, 3 5 2 3. P r e p a r e c h a n g e o r d e r s , a s n e c e s s a r y 8 8 2, 3 5 2 4. P e r i o d i c a n d o n - c a l l s i t e v i s i t s 4 4 1, 1 7 6 6. C o n d u c t f i n a l w a l k - t h r o u g h 8 8 2, 3 5 2 7. P r e p a r e r e c o r d d r a w i n g s 1 2 42 7 Su b t o t a l H o u r s : 0 3 3 0 3 4 0 0 0 67 Su b t o t a l F e e s : $ 0 $ 5 , 3 1 3 $0 $ 4 , 5 2 2 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 9 , 8 3 5 TO T A L F E E S : $ 2 1 6 $ 7 , 5 6 7 $0 $ 6 , 6 5 0 $ 2 1 6 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1 4 , 6 4 9 To t a l L u m p S u m C o m p e n s a t i o n : $ 1 4 , 6 4 9 Pa g e 1 o f 1 Page 138 of 164 Attachment A4 Project Location Map Serenda Drainage Improvements 1000 ft N ➤➤ N © 2016 Google © 2016 Google © 2016 Google Page 139 of 164 Prepared by: July 5, 2017 1/2 Attachment B4 Additional Scope of Services Task Order No. SBE-17-001 Serenada Drainage Improvements 1. General Description of Amendment: Surveying, design, plan preparation, bidding and construction phase services for miscellaneous drainage improvements in the Serenada neighborhood. The work areas are shown on Attachment A4. No services will be provided for other areas except by an Amendment to this Task Order. 2. Design Phase Services: This phase of the project will commence after the Owner has signed and executed this Task Order Amendment. One major plan review submittal and subsequent design revisions is included in this scope of work. The basic services for this phase include: a. Obtain and review related project data, reports and studies. b. Review survey base map and visit the various project sites to verify, photograph, and evaluate existing conditions with respect to drainage structures and patterns. c. Prepare construction drawings and specifications for the miscellaneous drainage improvements in accordance with the latest City of Georgetown Construction Specifications and generally accepted engineering practices. d. Utilize survey and City data to identify potential conflicts with existing utilities. Note any potential conflicts on the plans for the contractor to verify and protect. e. Submit plans to City staff for review. Modify plans based on comments received. This scope excludes addressing comments from City departments other than Transportation. f. Prepare construction contract documents for review and approval by the Owner. The most recent version of the City's standard construction contract documents, as provided by the City, shall be used. These may include contract agreement forms, general conditions and supplementary conditions, invitations to bid, instructions to bidders, insurance and bonding requirements, and preparation of other contract-related documents. 3. Surveying Services: This phase of the project will occur concurrently with the Design Phase. The basic services for this phase include: a. Topographic Surveying i. Conduct pre-field operations (Texas811, OneCall) ii. Perform topographic field surveying iii. Office-process, draft, DTM iv. Perform internal QA/QC 4. Bidding Phase Services: This phase of the project will provide bidding phase services to assist the City’s Purchasing Department. The basic services for this phase include: a. Assist Owner in advertising for and obtaining bids for the construction contract. b. Respond to questions from prospective Bidders. Page 140 of 164 Prepared by: July 5, 2017 2/2 c. Issue addenda as appropriate to interpret, clarify, or expand the bidding documents d. Assist with award procedures by preparing, delivering, and coordinating execution of the contract documents. e. If required, attend the GTAB and Council meetings where the construction contract is considered to assist in answering any questions regarding the recommendation of award. 5. Construction Phase Administration Services: This phase of the project will provide construction phase administration services. The basic services for this phase include: a. Attend and conduct one pre-construction conference. b. Review shop drawings and submittals turned in by the contractor for compliance with design concepts. c. Review contractor pay requests and provide concurrence for City review and payment. d. Issue necessary interpretation and clarifications of the contract documents, prepare change orders and make recommendations to the acceptability of the work, as required. This scope is limited to two (2) change orders. e. Conduct site visits periodically during construction and at the request of the City. This scope is limited to four (4) hours. f. Conduct final walk-through with City staff and prepare punch-list items to be addressed/corrected by Contractor. g. Prepare record drawings based on information provided by the contractor, by utilizing Adobe Acrobat or similar software to digitize markups "on top" of approved plans. 6. Reimbursables: Reimbursable expenses not included in the stated compensation amount and will be billed to Client at Engineer’s cost. Reimbursable expenses may include, but are not limited to: postage or other delivery charges, document reproductions, third-party contractors or consultants (if applicable), and third-party fees listed above (if any) that are greater than anticipated. 7. Exclusions: The following services are specifically excluded from this Task Order Amendment: a. Utility relocation design b. Surveying of subsurface utilities, except where uncovered by others c. Underground storm sewer design d. Geotechnical investigation e. Construction Inspection f. Right-of-way or easement acquisition, including preparation of field notes and legal descriptions g. Public Involvement (meetings with landowners, etc.) h. Coordination of materials testing services (typically provided by Contractor) i. Work in any area outside of the Project Limits shown on the attachment j. TDLR review & inspection (no pedestrian elements proposed) k. TCEQ coordination or permitting (all work considered to be maintenance and not regulated) Page 141 of 164 Pr e p a r e d b y At t a c h m e n t C 4 - E s t i m a t e d F e e S c h e d u l e Ta s k O r d e r S B E - 1 7 - 0 0 1 Se r e n d a D r a i n a g e I m p r o v e m e n t s 7/ 5 / 2 0 1 7 Es t i m a t e d F e e S c h e d u l e Ta s k a n d D e s c r i p t i o n Se n i o r En g i n e e r En g i n e e r (P E ) Re g i s t e r e d Su r v e y o r En g i n e e r in T r a i n i n g Se n i o r Te c h n i c i a n Cl e r i c a l 2- M a n Su r v e y To t a l Es t i m a t e Ho u r l y R a t e : 21 6 1 6 1 1 3 4 1 3 3 1 2 8 7 2 1 6 0 De s i g n P h a s e 1. O b t a i n r e l a t e d d a t a , p l a t s , p l a n s , s t u d i e s a n d r e p o r t s 2 6 1 , 1 2 0 2. R e v i e w a n d e v a l u a t e e x i s t i n g c o n d i t i o n s 4 4 1 , 1 7 6 3. P r e p a r e c o n s t r u c t i o n d r a w i n g s a n d s p e c s 2 8 3 2 5 , 9 7 6 4. U t i l i t y c o n f l i c t a s s e s s m e n t 2 4 8 5 4 5. C i t y r e v i e w a n d r e v i s i o n s 4 1 2 2 , 2 4 0 6. P r e p a r e c o n s t r u c t i o n c o n t r a c t d o c u m e n t s 1 2 8 1 , 6 0 2 Su b t o t a l H o u r s : 3 2 2 0 6 6 0 0 0 9 1 Su b t o t a l F e e s : $ 6 4 8 $ 3 , 5 4 2 $ 0 $ 8 , 7 7 8 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1 2 , 9 6 8 To p o g r a p h i c S u r v e y i n g P h a s e 1. P r e f i e l d ( T e x a s 8 1 1 , O n e C a l l ) 3 3 8 4 2. F i e l d - T o p o 1 3 2 5 , 2 5 4 3. O f f i c e - p r o c e s s , d r a f t , D T M 1 8 1 , 1 5 8 4. Q A / Q C 1 1 2 6 2 Su b t o t a l H o u r s : 00 3 0 1 2 0 3 2 4 7 Su b t o t a l F e e s : $ 0 $ 0 $ 4 0 2 $ 0 $ 1 , 5 3 6 $ 0 $ 5 , 1 2 0 $ 7 , 0 5 8 Bi d d i n g P h a s e S e r v i c e s 1. B i d a d v e r t i s e m e n t & m a n a g e m e n t 4 8 1 1 , 7 8 0 2. P r e p a r a t i o n o f C h a n g e O r d e r s 3 4 2 1 , 1 5 9 3. B i d d e r r e s e a r c h a n d a w a r d r e c o m m e n d a t i o n 12 53 8 4. A s s i s t w i t h a w a r d p r o c e d u r e s 1 4 6 9 3 5. A t t e n d G T A B a n d C o u n c i l m e e t i n g s 4 64 4 Su b t o t a l H o u r s : 1 1 4 0 1 6 0 3 0 3 4 Su b t o t a l F e e s : $ 2 1 6 $ 2 , 2 5 4 $ 0 $ 2 , 1 2 8 $ 0 $ 2 1 6 $ 0 $ 4 , 8 1 4 Co n s t r u c t i o n P h a s e S e r v i c e s 1. P r e - C o n s t r u c t i o n c o n f e r e n c e 2 2 5 8 8 2. R e v i e w o f s u b m i t t a l s , s h o p d r a w i n g s , & R F I s 2 4 8 5 4 3. P r e p a r a t i o n o f C h a n g e O r d e r s , i f n e c e s s a r y 4 4 1 , 1 7 6 4. S i t e v i s i t s a n d p r o g r e s s m e e t i n g a t t e n d e n c e 2 2 5 8 8 Pa g e 1 o f 2 Page 142 of 164 Pr e p a r e d b y At t a c h m e n t C 4 - E s t i m a t e d F e e S c h e d u l e Ta s k O r d e r S B E - 1 7 - 0 0 1 Se r e n d a D r a i n a g e I m p r o v e m e n t s 7/ 5 / 2 0 1 7 Es t i m a t e d F e e S c h e d u l e Ta s k a n d D e s c r i p t i o n Se n i o r En g i n e e r En g i n e e r (P E ) Re g i s t e r e d Su r v e y o r En g i n e e r in T r a i n i n g Se n i o r Te c h n i c i a n Cl e r i c a l 2- M a n Su r v e y To t a l Es t i m a t e Ho u r l y R a t e : 21 6 1 6 1 1 3 4 1 3 3 1 2 8 7 2 1 6 0 5. C o n d u c t f i n a l w a l k - t h r u 2 2 5 8 8 6. P r e p a r e r e c o r d d r a w i n g s 2 2 6 6 Su b t o t a l H o u r s : 0 1 2 0 1 6 0 0 0 2 8 Su b t o t a l F e e s : $ 0 $ 1 , 9 3 2 $ 0 $ 2 , 1 2 8 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 4 , 0 6 0 TO T A L H O U R S : 4 4 8 3 9 8 1 2 3 3 2 2 0 0 TO T A L F E E S : $ 8 6 4 $ 7 , 7 2 8 $ 4 0 2 $ 1 3 , 0 3 4 $ 1 , 5 3 6 $ 2 1 6 $ 5 , 1 2 0 $ 2 8 , 9 0 0 Pa g e 2 o f 2 Page 143 of 164 Rate Schedule Effective June 26, 2014 (All Rates Per Hour) Engineer (Principal) $233.00 Senior Engineer $216.00 Engineer (P.E.) $161.00 Project Manager $216.00 Engineer in Training (EIT) $133.00 Graduate Engineer $128.00 Senior Technician $128.00 GIS Technician $105.00 Design Technician $105.00 CADD Technician/ Draftsman $100.00 Survey Technician/ Draftsman $100.00 Registered Surveyor $134.00 Surveyor in Training (SIT) $105.00 1 Man Survey $145.00 2 Man Survey Party $160.00 3 Man Survey Party $175.00 Field Inspector $ 90.00 Clerical $ 72.00 Student Technician $ 33.00 Mileage Current IRS Rate Note: Expert Witness Fees are billed at 1.5 times the hourly rate. Page 144 of 164 City of Georgetown, Texas Transportation Advisory Board July 14, 2017 SUBJECT: Cons id eration and recommend ation on Tas k Order SBE-17-002 with Steger Bizzell o f Georgetown, TX in the amount of $173,124.00 for p ro fes s io nal engineering services related to the Old To wn No rtheas t Sidewalk Improvements - Wes ley Wright, P.E., Sys tems Engineering Direc tor ITEM SUMMARY: This task order inc lud es survey, design, bidd ing, and cons tructio n p hase s ervic es related to the Old Town Northeast sidewalks . The Old Town Northeas t s id ewalks were identified for imp ro vements in the rec ent ADA master p lan and fund ing was approved as part of the 2015 Road Bond Elec tio n. The s p ecific s id ewalks to be imp ro ved will be d etermined during design bas ed o n s urvey res ults . The area id entified for improvements is generally lo cated alo ng 7th & 8th S treet between Myrtle and S o uthwes tern University. The s cope of imp ro vements is exp ected to c os t approximately $1million, inc lud ing over a mile of new s id ewalks and o ver 80 new curb ramps. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The cost for profes s ional services is $173,124.00. Funds are availab le in the 2017 Trans p o rtatio n General Capital Impro vement Plan Bud get. GL 120-9-0880-91-008. SUBMITTED BY: Wes ley Wright ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Old Town NE Sidewalk Tas k Order Backup Material Old Town NE Sidewalk Mas ter Plan Backup Material Page 145 of 164 TASK ORDER Georgetown – Revised 3.11 EJCDC E-505 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Engineer Professional Services—Task Order Edition Copyright ©2004 National Society of Professional Engineers for EJCDC. All rights reserved. Attachment 1 – Task Order Form Page 1 of 4 Task Order In accordance with paragraph 1.01 of the Master Services Agreement between Owner and Steger Bizzell (“Engineer”) for Professional Services – Task Order Edition, dated April 11, 2016 ("Agreement"), Owner and Engineer agree as follows: 1. Specific Project Data A. Title: Old Town Northeast Sidewalks B. Description: The proposed project consists of the rehabilitation and installation of pedestrian facilities along several streets in northeast “Old Town” Georgetown. Various methods of rehabilitating existing non-compliant sidewalks will be considered. This project requires coordination with both TCEQ and TDLR and all proposed pedestrian elements will be ADA compliant with the Texas Accessibility Standards (TAS). C. City of Georgetown Project Number: ________ D. City of Georgetown General Ledger Account No.: _________________ E. City of Georgetown Purchase Order No.: _______________________________ F. Master Services Agreement, Contract Number: 2016-729-MSA____________ 2. Services of Engineer See the attached Scope of Services for a detailed description of services to be provided to Owner by Engineer. 3. Owner's Responsibilities Owner shall have those responsibilities set forth in the Agreement subject to the following: • Provide timely review comments to plan reviews and project scope changes. • Provide Agent Authorization as necessary to submit agency documentation. • Estimated third-party fees for this project are listed below, and are not included in the compensation amount detailed in Section 5. The City shall be responsible for all permitting and third-party review fees. o TCEQ WPAP Exception ($500) o TDLR Coordination Plan Review ($1,450) Filing Fee ($175) Inspection Fee ($2,200) o Geologic Assessment ($1,200) Task Order No. SBE-17-002, consisting of 11 pages. Page 146 of 164 TASK ORDER Georgetown – Revised 3.11 EJCDC E-505 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Engineer Professional Services—Task Order Edition Copyright ©2004 National Society of Professional Engineers for EJCDC. All rights reserved. Attachment 1 – Task Order Form Page 2 of 4 4. Times for Rendering Services Engineer shall perform the work stated above according to the schedule below. Durations are from the date of Notice to Proceed from Owner, or the previous phase, as appropriate. Durations may be concurrent. See the Scope of Services for more information. Phase Duration Surveying and Design Phase TCEQ Coordination Phase Bidding Phase Services Construction Phase Services Sixteen (16) Weeks Twelve (12) Weeks Eight (8) Weeks Twenty-Six (26) Weeks 5. Payments to Engineer A. Owner shall pay Engineer for services rendered as follows: Category of Services Compensation Method Lump Sum or Not to Exceed Amount of Compensation for Services Design, Topo Survey, Bidding, and Construction Admin Services Design Services (Wider 7th Street Sidewalk) Boundary/ROW Surveying Services Lump Sum Lump Sum Hourly Not to Exceed $123,276 $5,544 $44,304 All Services $173,124 B. The terms of payment are set forth in Article 4 of the Agreement unless modified in this Task Order. 6. Consultants: Prime consultant is Steger Bizzell. 7. Other Modifications to Agreement: None. 8. Attachments: Attachment "A" – Project Location Map Attachment "B" – Scope of Services Attachment "C" – Estimated Fee Schedule Attachment "D" – Rate Schedule 9. Documents Incorporated By Reference: The Agreement effective April 11, 2016. Page 147 of 164 TASK ORDER Georgetown – Revised 3.11 EJCDC E-505 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Engineer Professional Services—Task Order Edition Copyright ©2004 National Society of Professional Engineers for EJCDC. All rights reserved. Attachment 1 – Task Order Form Page 3 of 4 Terms and Conditions: Execution of this Task Order by Owner and Engineer shall make it subject to the terms and conditions of the Agreement (as modified above), which Agreement is incorporated by this reference. Engineer is authorized to begin performance upon its receipt of a copy of this Task Order signed by Owner. The Effective Date of this Task Order is ________________________, 2017. OWNER: ENGINEER: By: By: Name: Dale Ross Name: Perry Steger, P.E. Title: Mayor Title: Principal Engineer License or Firm’s Certificate No. F-181 State of: Texas Date: Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM ONLY BY CITY ATTORNEY AND BY CITY COUNCIL MARCH 8, 2011, AGENDA ITEM “P” APPROVED AS TO FORM VERIFIED: _________________________________________ Nicole Abrego, CTP Buyer Page 148 of 164 TASK ORDER Georgetown – Revised 3.11 EJCDC E-505 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Engineer Professional Services—Task Order Edition Copyright ©2004 National Society of Professional Engineers for EJCDC. All rights reserved. Attachment 1 – Task Order Form Page 4 of 4 DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE FOR TASK ORDER: DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE FOR TASK ORDER: Name: Nat Waggoner Name: Ben Lake, P.E. Title: Transportation Analyst Title: Project Manager Address: 300-1 Industrial Ave. Georgetown, TX 78626 Address: 1978 S. Austin Ave. Georgetown, TX 78626 E-Mail Address: nathaniel.wagoner@georgetown.org E-Mail Address: blake@stegerbizzell.com Phone: 512-930-8171 Phone: 512-930-9412 Fax: 512-930-3559 Fax: n/a Page 149 of 164 PROJECT LOCATION ATTACHMENT A PROJECT LOCATION MAP OLD TOWN NORTHEAST SIDEWALKS 03/02/2017 T.O. 17-XXXJOB NO. GEORGETOWN, TX 78626 STEGERBIZZELL.COM >>ENGINEERS >>PLANNERS >>SURVEYORS 512.930.9412 SERVICES METRO ADDRESS 1978 S. AUSTIN AVENUE WEBTEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-181 TBPLS FIRM No.10003700 DATE Page 150 of 164 Prepared by: June 22, 2017 1/3 Attachment "B" Additional Scope of Services Task Order No. SBE-17-002 Old Town Northeast Sidewalk Improvements 1. General Description of Amendment: Surveying, design, plan preparation, permitting, and bidding & construction administration for TAS compliant pedestrian improvements in northeast Old Town. 2. Design Phase Services: This phase of the project will commence after the Owner has signed and executed this Task Order Amendment. One major plan review submittal and subsequent design revisions is included in this scope of work. The basic services for this phase include: a. Obtain related project data, reports and studies. b. Conduct a pre-design conference with City staff to establish basic project criteria including, but not limited to proposed pedestrian elements, sidewalk width, feasibility of shared use path, traffic control, local resident coordination, etc. c. Prepare construction drawings and specifications in accordance with the latest City of Georgetown Construction Specifications and generally accepted engineering practices. Unless otherwise directed, basic design will conform with commonly accepted engineering practices that include the following: i. Maximum five-foot-wide concrete sidewalk along one side of the existing roadways within project limits, with a potential wider sidewalk (up to 10’ wide) along one side of 7th Street from Myrtle Street to Maple Street. Engineer shall evaluate the feasibility of the wider sidewalk, prepare a conceptual construction cost estimate, and review the results with City staff. 1. Should the City elect to include the wider sidewalk in the project, the fee for Engineer’s services to perform the additional design and permitting is noted on the Task Order Form, Page 2. (Permitting to be contemporaneous with the rest of the project; a separate permitting process is explicitly excluded.) This lump sum fee will NOT be billed if the City elects to forgo the wider 7th Street sidewalk. ii. Rehabilitation, or removal and replacement of existing sidewalks. iii. Stormwater management utilizing existing and proposed drainage structures iv. Retaining walls where necessary due to steep grades d. Identify water quality control measures and determine appropriate best management practices to meet TCEQ requirements. Coordinate a Geologic Assessment through a qualified subconsultant. Prepare and submit a Water Pollution Abatement Plan Exception Request to TCEQ. This Task Order assumes that the design of structural treatment methods (e.g. sand filter pond, Stormceptor, AquaLogic, etc.) is not required. e. Utilize survey and City data to identify potential conflicts with existing utilities. Every reasonable effort will be made to avoid conflicts with above-ground utilities. f. Submit plans to City staff for review. Modify plans based on comments received. This scope excludes addressing comments from City departments other than Transportation. Page 151 of 164 Prepared by: June 22, 2017 2/3 g. Prepare and submit project registration information to TDLR. Altura Solutions will perform the responsibilities of RAS and review the final construction plans for compliance with the TAS. The City will pay for the TDLR registration and RAS review and inspection fees directly to Altura Solutions. h. Prepare construction contract documents for review and approval by the Owner. The most recent version of the City's standard construction contract documents shall be used. These may include contract agreement forms, general conditions and supplementary conditions, invitations to bid, instructions to bidders, insurance and bonding requirements, and preparation of other contract-related documents. 3. Surveying Services: This phase of the project will occur concurrently with the Design Phase. The basic services for this phase include: a. Topographic Surveying Phase i. Prefield (Texas811, OneCall) ii. Field-Topo iii. Office-process, draft, DTM iv. QA/QC b. Boundary/ROW Surveying Phase i. Research/working sketch ii. Field-recovery and location iii. Office-process, boundary reconciliation and drafting iv. QA/QC 4. Bidding Phase Services: This phase of the project will commence after the Owner has completed final review and approval of the construction plans, specifications, and contract documents. The basic services for the Bidding Phase include: a. Assist Owner in advertising for and obtaining bids for the construction contract and responding to questions from prospective Bidders. b. Issue addenda as appropriate to interpret, clarify, or expand the bidding documents. c. Attend and conduct pre-bid meeting and bid opening meeting. d. Compile and tabulate bid results. Provide a recommendation of contract award to Owner after careful consideration and research of responsible and responsive bidders. e. Attend GTAB and council meetings to support recommendation of award. 5. Construction Phase Services: This phase of the project will commence after the Owner has awarded and executed a construction contract. The basic services for the Construction Phase include: a. Attend and conduct pre-construction conference. b. Review shop drawings and submittals turned in by the contractor for compliance with design concepts. c. Review field materials testing and laboratory reports for compliance with design concepts. d. Review contractor pay requests and provide concurrence for City review and payment. Page 152 of 164 Prepared by: June 22, 2017 3/3 e. Visit the project site at least twice monthly during construction to observe and document the progress and quality of the executed work. f. Issue necessary interpretation and clarifications of the contract documents, prepare change orders and make recommendations to the acceptability of the work, as required. g. Prepare record drawings based on information provided by the contractor, by utilizing Adobe Acrobat or similar software to digitize markups “on top” of approved plans. h. Attend TDLR accessibility inspection meeting with Altura Solutions representative. 6. Reimbursables: Reimbursable expenses not included in the stated compensation amount and will be billed to Client at Engineer’s cost. Reimbursable expenses may include, but are not limited to: postage or other delivery charges, document reproductions, third-party contractors or consultants (if applicable), and third-party fees listed above (if any) that are greater than anticipated. 7. Exclusions: The following services are specifically excluded from this Task Order Amendment. Some of these services or portions thereof are included in the original Task Order and subsequent Amendments: a. Utility relocation design b. Surveying of subsurface utilities, except where uncovered by others c. Underground storm sewer design d. Geotechnical investigation e. Traffic Impact Analysis or any traffic counts f. Construction Inspection g. Right-of-way or easement acquisition, including preparation of field notes and legal descriptions h. Public Involvement (meetings with landowners, etc.) i. Coordination of materials testing services (typically provided by Contractor) j. Work in any area outside of the Project Limits k. Compliance with the Downtown Overlay design criteria l. Design of structural BMPs for water quality treatment Page 153 of 164 Pr e p a r e d b y At t a c h m e n t " C " - E s t i m a t e d F e e S c h e d u l e Ta s k O r d e r S B E - 1 7 - 0 0 2 Ol d T o w n N o r t h e a s t S i d e w a l k I m p r o v e m e n t s 6/ 2 2 / 2 0 1 7 Es t i m a t e d F e e S c h e d u l e Ta s k a n d D e s c r i p t i o n En g i n e e r (P r i n c i p a l ) Se n i o r En g i n e e r En g i n e e r (P E ) Re g i s t e r e d Su r v e y o r En g i n e e r in T r a i n i n g Se n i o r Te c h n i c i a n Cl e r i c a l 1- M a n Su r v e y 2- M a n Su r v e y To t a l Es t i m a t e Ho u r l y R a t e : 23 3 2 1 6 1 6 1 1 3 4 1 3 3 1 2 8 7 2 1 4 5 1 6 0 De s i g n P h a s e 1. O b t a i n r e l a t e d d a t a , p l a t s , p l a n s , s t u d i e s a n d r e p o r t s 2 8 1 , 3 8 6 2. P r e - d e s i g n c o n f e r e n c e 4 8 1 , 7 0 8 3. P r e p a r e c o n s t r u c t i o n d r aw i n g s a n d s p e c i f i c a t i o n s a. P r e l i m i n a r y S i d e w a l k l a y o u t 24 4 8 1 0 , 2 4 8 b. D e t a i l e d S i d e w a l k d e s i g n 4 8 4 0 8 0 1 9 , 7 4 0 c. S i d e w a l k r e h a b i l i t a t i o n r e s e a r c h a n d e v a l u a t i o n 2 1 6 1 6 5 , 1 3 6 e. S t o r m w a t e r m a n a g e m e n t 16 2 4 5 , 7 6 8 f. P l a n p r e p a r a t i o n 32 8 0 1 5 , 7 9 2 g. C o s t e s t i m a t e , s p e c i f ic a t i o n s & p r o j e c t m a n u a l 2 8 1 6 2 4 7 , 9 6 2 4. T D L R C o o r d i n a t i o n 8 4 1 , 8 2 0 5. T C E Q C o o r d i n a t i o n a. P r e p a r e W P A P 2 1 2 1 6 4 , 4 9 2 b. A t t e n d W P A P s ub m i t t a l m e e t i n g 2 2 5 8 8 Su b t o t a l H o u r s : 6 2 0 1 7 2 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 8 Su b t o t a l F e e s : $ 1 , 3 9 8 $ 4 , 3 2 0 $ 2 7 , 6 9 2 $ 0 $ 4 1 , 2 3 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 7 4 , 6 4 0 De s i g n P h a s e ( W i d e r 7 t h S t S i d e w a l k ) 1. D e t a i l e d s i d e w a l k d e s i g n , p l a n p r e p , & q u a n t i t i e s 8 3 2 5 , 5 4 4 Subtotal H o u r s : 0 0 8 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 Su b t o t a l F e e s : $ 0 $ 0 $ 1 , 2 8 8 $ 0 $ 4 , 2 5 6 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 5 , 5 4 4 To p o g r a p h i c S u r v e y i n g P h a s e 1. P r e f i e l d ( T e x a s 8 1 1 , O n e C a l l 4 8 1 , 5 6 0 2. F i e l d - T o p o 6 4 0 8 7 , 8 8 4 3. O f f i c e - p r o c e s s , d r a f t , D T M 8 3 6 5 , 6 8 0 4. Q A / Q C 2 2 5 2 4 Su b t o t a l H o u r s : 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 6 0 4 0 8 1 1 4 Su b t o t a l F e e s : $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 2 , 6 8 0 $ 0 $ 5 , 8 8 8 $ 0 $ 5 , 8 0 0 $ 1 , 2 8 0 $ 1 5 , 6 4 8 Bo u n d a r y / R O W S u r v e y i n g P h a s e 1. R e s e a r c h / w o r k i n g s k e t c h 20 6 0 1 0 , 3 6 0 2. F i e l d - r e c o v e r y a n d l o c a t i o n 20 4 0 1 2 0 2 7 , 0 0 0 3. O f f i c e - p r o c e s s , b n d y r e c o n c i l i a t i o n a n d d r a f t i n g 40 4 5 , 8 7 2 4. Q A / Q C 8 1, 0 7 2 Su b t o t a l H o u r s : 0 0 0 8 8 0 1 0 4 0 0 1 2 0 3 1 2 Su b t o t a l F e e s : $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1 1 , 7 9 2 $ 0 $ 1 3 , 3 1 2 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1 9 , 2 0 0 $ 4 4 , 3 0 4 Pa g e 1 o f 2 Page 154 of 164 Pr e p a r e d b y At t a c h m e n t " C " - E s t i m a t e d F e e S c h e d u l e Ta s k O r d e r S B E - 1 7 - 0 0 2 Ol d T o w n N o r t h e a s t S i d e w a l k I m p r o v e m e n t s 6/ 2 2 / 2 0 1 7 Es t i m a t e d F e e S c h e d u l e Ta s k a n d D e s c r i p t i o n En g i n e e r (P r i n c i p a l ) Se n i o r En g i n e e r En g i n e e r (P E ) Re g i s t e r e d Su r v e y o r En g i n e e r in T r a i n i n g Se n i o r Te c h n i c i a n Cl e r i c a l 1- M a n Su r v e y 2- M a n Su r v e y To t a l Es t i m a t e Ho u r l y R a t e : 23 3 2 1 6 1 6 1 1 3 4 1 3 3 1 2 8 7 2 1 4 5 1 6 0 Bi d d i n g P h a s e S e r v i c e s 1. B i d a d v e r t i s e m e n t & m a n a g e m e n t 8 2 4 4 4 , 7 6 8 2. P r e p a r a t i o n o f C h a n g e O r d e r s , i f n e c e s s a r y 4 1 6 8 4 , 5 0 4 3. B i d d e r r e s e a r c h a n d a w a r d r e c o m m e n d a t i o n 8 8 2 , 3 5 2 4. A s s i s t w i t h a w a r d p r o c e d u r e s 2 8 8 2 , 8 1 8 5. A t t e n d G T A B a n d C o u n c i l m e e t i n g s 4 4 1 , 1 7 6 Su b t o t a l H o u r s : 2 4 4 4 0 5 2 0 4 0 0 1 0 6 Su b t o t a l F e e s : $ 4 6 6 $ 8 6 4 $ 7 , 0 8 4 $ 0 $ 6 , 9 1 6 $ 0 $ 2 8 8 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1 5 , 6 1 8 Co n s t r u c t i o n P h a s e S e r v i c e s 1. P r e - C o n s t r u c t i o n c o n f e r e n c e 2 4 4 1 , 6 0 8 2. R e v i e w o f s u b m i t t a l s , s h o p d r a w i n g s , & R F I s 4 8 8 3 , 2 1 6 3. P r e p a r a t i o n o f C h a n g e O r d e r s , i f n e c e s s a r y 8 1 6 3 , 4 1 6 4. S i t e v i s i t s a n d p r o g r e s s m e e t i n g a t t e n d e n c e 8 8 8 4 , 2 1 6 5. C o n d u c t f i n a l w a l k - t h r u , in c l u d i n g T D L R i n s p e c t i o n 6 1 2 2 , 5 6 2 6. P r e p a r e r e c o r d d r a w i n g s 8 8 2 , 3 5 2 Su b t o t a l H o u r s : 8 6 4 2 0 5 6 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 Su b t o t a l F e e s : $ 1 , 8 6 4 $ 1 , 2 9 6 $ 6 , 7 6 2 $ 0 $ 7 , 4 4 8 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1 7 , 3 7 0 TO T A L H O U R S : 1 6 3 0 2 5 8 1 0 8 4 1 8 1 5 0 4 4 0 1 2 8 1 , 1 5 2 TO T A L F E E S : $ 3 , 7 2 8 $ 6 , 4 8 0 $ 4 1 , 5 3 8 $ 1 4 , 4 7 2 $ 5 5 , 5 9 4 $ 1 9 , 2 0 0 $ 2 8 8 $ 5 , 8 0 0 $ 2 0 , 4 8 0 $ 1 7 3 , 1 2 4 De s i g n , T o p o S u r v e y , B i d d i n g , a n d C o n s t r u c t i o n A d m i n S e r v i c e s : $ 1 2 3 , 2 7 6 De s i g n S e r v i c e s ( W i d e r 7 t h S t r e e t S i d e w a l k ) : $ 5 , 5 4 4 Bo u n d a r y / R O W S u r v e y i n g S e r v i c e s : $ 4 4 , 3 0 4 Pa g e 2 o f 2 Page 155 of 164 Rate Schedule Effective June 26, 2014 (All Rates Per Hour) Engineer (Principal) $233.00 Senior Engineer $216.00 Engineer (P.E.) $161.00 Project Manager $216.00 Engineer in Training (EIT) $133.00 Graduate Engineer $128.00 Senior Technician $128.00 GIS Technician $105.00 Design Technician $105.00 CADD Technician/ Draftsman $100.00 Survey Technician/ Draftsman $100.00 Registered Surveyor $134.00 Surveyor in Training (SIT) $105.00 1 Man Survey $145.00 2 Man Survey Party $160.00 3 Man Survey Party $175.00 Field Inspector $ 90.00 Clerical $ 72.00 Student Technician $ 33.00 Mileage Current IRS Rate Note: Expert Witness Fees are billed at 1.5 times the hourly rate. Page 156 of 164 Page 157 of 164 City of Georgetown, Texas Transportation Advisory Board July 14, 2017 SUBJECT: Cons id eration and recommend ation on award o f a b id to Jo rd an Foster Cons truc tio n o f P flugerville, TX in the amount of $5,599,200.86 for cons truction of the S o uthwes t Bypass, Segment 1 - Wes ley Wright, P.E., Sys tems Engineering Direc tor ITEM SUMMARY: The Southwes t Bypas s will ultimately c o nnec t SH29 to the IH35 Frontage Road, provid ing alternate ac ces s to IH35 fro m b o th S H 29 and Leander Road (F M 2243). T he Southwest Bypas s will als o ultimately link up with Southeas t Innerloop and SE1 (Sam Ho us to n) to p ro vide acc es s to SH130. A majority o f the R OW was donated b y Texas Crus hed Sto ne via the exis ting Ind us trial Agreement dated March 2011. This p ro ject has b een d es igned and bid p er the terms of an Interlo cal Agreement between the City and Williamson County fro m F eb ruary 2016. Per the terms o f that agreement, the City will cons truct Segment 1 and the County will utilize bond funds to reimburs e those costs . Ultimately the C o unty will design, bid, and b uild Segment 2 thems elves. Southwest Bypas s Segment 1 will start at the rec ently c o nstruc ted (b y the County) d riveway at the IH35 Service Road , jus t s outh of SE Innerloop. S egment 1 will continue o ver the Geo rgeto wn Railro ad and thro ugh a portion of Texas Crushed Stone Property kno wn as the Barnes Trac t. Segment 1 is ap p ro ximately a half mile long (2,250 LF) inc luding ap p ro ximately 860 LF o f bridge, and will s top s hort o f the exis ting quarry p it. Segment 1 will be an undivid ed , two lane roadway (one lane eac h d irectio n) and will s erve as the ultimate (future) wes tbound frontage road fo r the future freeway. Staff rec ently rec eived s ix b id s for the propo s ed projec t with Jordan Fo s ter C o ns truc tion being the lowes t res p o nsive, res pons ib le bidder at $5,599,200.86. This is ap p ro ximately 20% b elo w the engineer's estimate and o ver $200,000 lo wer than the sec o nd low bidder. Jordan Fo s ter is c urrently contrac ted fo r the S o uthwes t Bypass's north s ec tion. Work is p ro ceeding well ahead o f sc hed ule and Jordan F o s ter has p roven to b e c ap ab le of hand ling s uc h an imp o rtant p ro ject. City s taff, Williams on C o unty, HNTB (p ro ject management c o nsultant), and HDR (d es ign engineer) all recommend award. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The total c o s t of c ons tructio n fo r So uthwes t Byp as s , Segment 1 is $5,599,200.86 - all of which will be reimb ursed by Williams o n County p er the terms of the exis ting Interlo cal Agreement. SUBMITTED BY: Wes ley Wright ATTACHMENTS: Page 158 of 164 Description Type Bid Tabs Backup Material Location Map Backup Material Page 159 of 164 HNTB Corporation 101 E. Old Settlers Blvd Telephone (512) 744-9082 The HNTB Companies Suite 100 www.hntb.com Engineers Architects Planners Round Rock, TX 78664 July 6, 2017 City of Georgetown 300-1 Industrial Ave. Georgetown, Texas 78626 Attention: Wesley Wright, P.E. Systems Engineering Director Re: Southwest Bypass Segment 1 City of Georgetown Project No. 2017-0065-CIP Recommendation of Contractor Award Dear Mr. Wright, Please find attached the bid tabulations for the subject-referenced project. The bids have been reviewed for correctness, with Jordan Foster Construction being the low bidder. There were four bids that had rounding adjustments. No adjustment affected the final order of the bids nor the apparent low bidder. Following is a summary of the bid totals: 1. Jordan Foster Construction $5,599,200.86 2. Capital Excavation $5,840,343.90 3. Chasco Constructors $6,295,098.54 4. Cox Commercial Construction $6,528,897.80 5. Joe Bland Construction $7,339,107.10 6. Austin Engineering $7,763,869.00 The Contractor’s low bid is 19.8% below the Engineer’s Estimate. In addition to meeting the bid qualifications subject to being low bidder, Jordan Foster Construction has performed similar work on other projects for Williamson County and received positive recommendations from the three references contacted. Based on the references provided by the Contractor and the previous work done by Jordan Foster Construction for Williamson County, we recommend award of the Southwest Bypass Segment 1 construction contract to Jordan Foster Construction in the contract amount of $5,599,200.86. Please feel free to contact our office with any questions. Page 160 of 164 Southwest Bypass Segment 1 City of Georgetown Project No. 2017-0065-CIP Recommendation of Contractor Award July 6, 2017 Page 2 of 2 Respectfully Submitted, HNTB Corporation Christen Eschberger, P.E. VIA E-MAIL Attachments: Bid Tabulation Analysis Cc: David Morgan, Georgetown City Manager Jim Briggs, Georgetown GM Utilities Skye Masson, Georgetown Assistant City Attorney Ed Polasek, City of Georgetown Joel Weaver, City of Georgetown Judge Gattis, Williamson County Judge Commissioner Covey, Williamson County, Pct. 3 Robert B. Daigh, Williamson County Mike Weaver, Prime Strategies, Inc. Richard Ridings, HNTB Corporation Page 161 of 164 City of Georgetown 2017-0065-CIP - Southwest Bypass: Segment 1 Bid Tabulation June 27, 2017 UNIT COST AMOUNT BID UNIT COST AMOUNT BID UNIT COST AMOUNT BID UNIT COST AMOUNT BID UNIT COST AMOUNT BID UNIT COST AMOUNT BID UNIT COST AMOUNT BID 1 1 INSURANCE, BONDS AND MOVE-IN RELATED EXPENSES NOT TO EXCEED 5% OF TOTAL BID 1 LS 90,000.00$ 90,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 221,000.00$ 221,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 130,000.00$ 130,000.00$ 150,000.00$ 150,000.00$ 2 2 GATE ATTENDANT 3,370 HR 10.00$ 33,700.00$ 20.00$ 67,400.00$ 15.00$ 50,550.00$ 16.00$ 53,920.00$ 20.00$ 67,400.00$ 25.00$ 84,250.00$ 39.00$ 131,430.00$ 3 100-6002 PREPARING ROW 32 STA 8,500.00$ 272,000.00$ 3,800.00$ 121,600.00$ 3,000.00$ 96,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 128,000.00$ 4,500.00$ 144,000.00$ 2,400.00$ 76,800.00$ 2,500.00$ 80,000.00$ 4 100-6004 PREP ROW (TREE)(12"-24"DIA) 78 EA 800.00$ 62,400.00$ 295.00$ 23,010.00$ 100.00$ 7,800.00$ 330.00$ 25,740.00$ 250.00$ 19,500.00$ 19.00$ 1,482.00$ 150.00$ 11,700.00$ 5 100-6005 PREP ROW (TREE)(24"-30"DIA)4 EA 1,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 400.00$ 1,600.00$ 200.00$ 800.00$ 390.00$ 1,560.00$ 250.00$ 1,000.00$ 187.00$ 748.00$ 300.00$ 1,200.00$ 6 100-6011 PREPARING ROW(TREE)(24" TO 36" DIA.) 18 EA 1,100.00$ 19,800.00$ 425.00$ 7,650.00$ 300.00$ 5,400.00$ 450.00$ 8,100.00$ 250.00$ 4,500.00$ 83.00$ 1,494.00$ 1,000.00$ 18,000.00$ 7 104-6001 REMOVING CONC (PAV)143 SY 6.00$ 858.00$ 12.00$ 1,716.00$ 35.00$ 5,005.00$ 15.00$ 2,145.00$ 8.00$ 1,144.00$ 17.00$ 2,431.00$ 25.00$ 3,575.00$ 8 104-6013 REMOVING CONC (FOUNDATIONS) 760 SY 160.00$ 121,600.00$ 15.00$ 11,400.00$ 35.00$ 26,600.00$ 10.00$ 7,600.00$ 18.00$ 13,680.00$ 14.00$ 10,640.00$ 13.00$ 9,880.00$ 9 104-6015 REMOVING CONC (SIDEWALKS) 74 SY 15.00$ 1,110.00$ 15.00$ 1,110.00$ 10.00$ 740.00$ 6.00$ 444.00$ 7.00$ 518.00$ 22.00$ 1,628.00$ 25.00$ 1,850.00$ 10 105-6011 REMOVING STAB BASE AND ASPH PAV (2"-6") 1,399 SY 5.00$ 6,995.00$ 2.50$ 3,497.50$ 4.00$ 5,596.00$ 3.00$ 4,197.00$ 5.00$ 6,995.00$ 6.00$ 8,394.00$ 13.00$ 18,187.00$ 11 110-6001 EXCAVATION (ROADWAY)1,402 CY 12.00$ 16,824.00$ 19.00$ 26,638.00$ 17.00$ 23,834.00$ 15.00$ 21,030.00$ 9.00$ 12,618.00$ 23.00$ 32,246.00$ 17.00$ 23,834.00$ 12 132-6006 EMBANKMENT (FINAL)(DENS CONT)(TY C) 67,137 CY 13.00$ 872,781.00$ 11.00$ 738,507.00$ 15.00$ 1,007,055.00$ 18.75$ 1,258,818.75$ 19.50$ 1,309,171.50$ 27.00$ 1,812,699.00$ 27.00$ 1,812,699.00$ 13 161-6017 COMPOST MANUF TOPSOIL (4") 51,814 SY 2.75$ 142,488.50$ 2.25$ 116,581.50$ 2.00$ 103,628.00$ 1.35$ 69,948.90$ 3.20$ 165,804.80$ 2.00$ 103,628.00$ 5.00$ 259,070.00$ 14 164-6009 BROADCAST SEED (TEMP) (WARM) 25,909 SY 0.11$ 2,849.99$ 0.12$ 3,109.08$ 0.10$ 2,590.90$ 0.14$ 3,627.26$ 0.20$ 5,181.80$ 0.14$ 3,627.26$ 0.20$ 5,181.80$ 15 164-6011 BROADCAST SEED (TEMP) (COOL) 25,909 SY 0.11$ 2,849.99$ 0.12$ 3,109.08$ 0.10$ 2,590.90$ 0.14$ 3,627.26$ 0.20$ 5,181.80$ 0.14$ 3,627.26$ 0.20$ 5,181.80$ 16 164-6023 CELL FBR MLCH SEED(PERM) (RURAL)(CLAY) 51,814 SY 0.35$ 18,134.90$ 0.15$ 7,772.10$ 0.15$ 7,772.10$ 0.18$ 9,326.52$ 0.20$ 10,362.80$ 0.17$ 8,808.38$ 0.50$ 25,907.00$ 17 168-6001 VEGETATIVE WATERING 1,555 MG 20.00$ 31,100.00$ 22.00$ 34,210.00$ 10.00$ 15,550.00$ 20.00$ 31,100.00$ 20.00$ 31,100.00$ 15.00$ 23,325.00$ 50.00$ 77,750.00$ 18 169-6001 SOIL RETENTION BLANKETS (CL 1) (TY A) 26,405 SY 1.05$ 27,725.25$ 1.40$ 36,967.00$ 1.20$ 31,686.00$ 1.25$ 33,006.25$ 1.20$ 31,686.00$ 1.40$ 36,967.00$ 1.25$ 33,006.25$ 19 247-6041 FL BS (CMP IN PLC) (TYA GR1&2) (FNAL POS) 3,140 CY 45.00$ 141,300.00$ 36.00$ 113,040.00$ 36.00$ 113,040.00$ 33.00$ 103,620.00$ 30.00$ 94,200.00$ 41.00$ 128,740.00$ 36.00$ 113,040.00$ 20 310-6027 PRIME COAT(MC-30 OR AE-P) 1,674 GAL 4.00$ 6,696.00$ 2.50$ 4,185.00$ 3.00$ 5,022.00$ 4.00$ 6,696.00$ 3.00$ 5,022.00$ 3.00$ 5,022.00$ 4.20$ 7,030.80$ 21 340-6011 D-GR HMA(SQ) TY-B PG64-22 1,439 TON 85.00$ 122,315.00$ 62.00$ 89,218.00$ 64.00$ 92,096.00$ 71.00$ 102,169.00$ 60.00$ 86,340.00$ 63.00$ 90,657.00$ 95.00$ 136,705.00$ 22 340-6120 D-GR HMA(SQ) TY-D SAC-B PG70-22 713 TON 95.00$ 67,735.00$ 89.00$ 63,457.00$ 92.00$ 65,596.00$ 90.00$ 64,170.00$ 85.00$ 60,605.00$ 92.00$ 65,596.00$ 105.00$ 74,865.00$ 23 400-6005 CEM STABIL BKFL 130 CY 130.00$ 16,900.00$ 125.00$ 16,250.00$ 130.00$ 16,900.00$ 155.00$ 20,150.00$ 250.00$ 32,500.00$ 270.00$ 35,100.00$ 175.00$ 22,750.00$ 24 401-6001 FLOWABLE BACKFILL 10 CY 500.00$ 5,000.00$ 140.00$ 1,400.00$ 330.00$ 3,300.00$ 350.00$ 3,500.00$ 600.00$ 6,000.00$ 450.00$ 4,500.00$ 250.00$ 2,500.00$ 25 420-6007 CL A CONC (FLUME)64 CY 470.00$ 30,080.00$ 435.00$ 27,840.00$ 560.00$ 35,840.00$ 425.00$ 27,200.00$ 600.00$ 38,400.00$ 517.00$ 33,088.00$ 540.00$ 34,560.00$ 26 420-6009 CL A CONC (COLLAR)2 EA 1,400.00$ 2,800.00$ 900.00$ 1,800.00$ 1,300.00$ 2,600.00$ 1,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 575.00$ 1,150.00$ 3,000.00$ 6,000.00$ 27 420-6013 CL C CONC (ABUT)69 CY 825.00$ 56,925.00$ 775.00$ 53,475.00$ 700.00$ 48,300.00$ 860.00$ 59,340.00$ 1,175.00$ 81,075.00$ 1,240.00$ 85,560.00$ 1,300.00$ 89,700.00$ 28 420-6029 CL C CONC (CAP)162 CY 760.00$ 123,120.00$ 800.00$ 129,600.00$ 730.00$ 118,260.00$ 870.00$ 140,940.00$ 750.00$ 121,500.00$ 822.00$ 133,164.00$ 860.00$ 139,320.00$ 29 420-6037 CL C CONC (COLUMN)235 CY 810.00$ 190,350.00$ 800.00$ 188,000.00$ 650.00$ 152,750.00$ 875.00$ 205,625.00$ 950.00$ 223,250.00$ 1,040.00$ 244,400.00$ 1,085.00$ 254,975.00$ 30 420-6043 CL C CONC (FOOTING)996 CY 745.00$ 742,020.00$ 350.00$ 348,600.00$ 480.00$ 478,080.00$ 370.00$ 368,520.00$ 400.00$ 398,400.00$ 433.00$ 431,268.00$ 440.00$ 438,240.00$ 31 422-6001 REINF CONC SLAB 41,950 SF 15.00$ 629,250.00$ 15.00$ 629,250.00$ 13.00$ 545,350.00$ 16.00$ 671,200.00$ 15.50$ 650,225.00$ 17.00$ 713,150.00$ 17.00$ 713,150.00$ 32 422-6015 APPROACH SLAB 115 CY 410.00$ 47,150.00$ 310.00$ 35,650.00$ 500.00$ 57,500.00$ 350.00$ 40,250.00$ 450.00$ 51,750.00$ 506.00$ 58,190.00$ 530.00$ 60,950.00$ 33 423-6002 RETAINING WALL (MSE) (ASHLAR STONE FIN) 18,218 SF 44.00$ 801,592.00$ 39.45$ 718,700.10$ 45.00$ 819,810.00$ 39.75$ 724,165.50$ 42.00$ 765,156.00$ 43.00$ 783,374.00$ 45.00$ 819,810.00$ 34 425-6039 PRESTR CONC GIRDER (TX54) 4,752 LF 150.00$ 712,800.00$ 126.50$ 601,128.00$ 131.00$ 622,512.00$ 140.00$ 665,280.00$ 160.00$ 760,320.00$ 183.00$ 869,616.00$ 183.00$ 869,616.00$ 35 432-6001 RIPRAP (CONC)(4 IN)128 CY 460.00$ 58,880.00$ 425.00$ 54,400.00$ 400.00$ 51,200.00$ 410.00$ 52,480.00$ 600.00$ 76,800.00$ 517.00$ 66,176.00$ 540.00$ 69,120.00$ 36 432-6031 RIPRAP (STONE PROTECTION)(12 IN) 234 CY 135.00$ 31,590.00$ 100.00$ 23,400.00$ 65.00$ 15,210.00$ 110.00$ 25,740.00$ 105.00$ 24,570.00$ 73.00$ 17,082.00$ 140.00$ 32,760.00$ 37 432-6033 RIPRAP (STONE PROTECTION)(18 IN) 46 CY 130.00$ 5,980.00$ 140.00$ 6,440.00$ 75.00$ 3,450.00$ 110.00$ 5,060.00$ 110.00$ 5,060.00$ 84.00$ 3,864.00$ 150.00$ 6,900.00$ 38 432-6045 RIPRAP (MOW STRIP)(4 IN)55 CY 485.00$ 26,675.00$ 500.00$ 27,500.00$ 500.00$ 27,500.00$ 550.00$ 30,250.00$ 700.00$ 38,500.00$ 776.00$ 42,680.00$ 520.00$ 28,600.00$ 39 450-6023 RAIL (TY SSTR)2,667 LF 55.00$ 146,685.00$ 53.00$ 141,351.00$ 60.00$ 160,020.00$ 98.00$ 261,366.00$ 52.00$ 138,684.00$ 57.00$ 152,019.00$ 60.00$ 160,020.00$ 40 450-6048 RAIL (HANDRAIL)(TY B)421 LF 85.00$ 35,785.00$ 80.00$ 33,680.00$ 75.00$ 31,575.00$ 82.00$ 34,522.00$ 75.00$ 31,575.00$ 91.00$ 38,311.00$ 87.00$ 36,627.00$ 41 454-6001 SEALED EXPANSION JOINT (4 IN) (SEJ - A) 215 LF 90.00$ 19,350.00$ 72.00$ 15,480.00$ 80.00$ 17,200.00$ 70.00$ 15,050.00$ 120.00$ 25,800.00$ 135.00$ 29,025.00$ 140.00$ 30,100.00$ 42 460-6023 CMP (GAL STL 15 IN) 32 LF 70.00$ 2,240.00$ 82.00$ 2,624.00$ 70.00$ 2,240.00$ 60.00$ 1,920.00$ 85.00$ 2,720.00$ 148.00$ 4,736.00$ 42.00$ 1,344.00$ 43 462-6002 CONC BOX CULV (3 FT X 3 FT)60 LF 170.00$ 10,200.00$ 195.00$ 11,700.00$ 245.00$ 14,700.00$ 175.00$ 10,500.00$ 190.00$ 11,400.00$ 168.00$ 10,080.00$ 135.00$ 8,100.00$ 44 462-6004 CONC BOX CULV (4 FT X 3 FT) 147 LF 180.00$ 26,460.00$ 210.00$ 30,870.00$ 220.00$ 32,340.00$ 210.00$ 30,870.00$ 190.00$ 27,930.00$ 213.00$ 31,311.00$ 165.00$ 24,255.00$ 45 464-6005 RC PIPE (CL III)(24 IN)90 LF 100.00$ 9,000.00$ 85.00$ 7,650.00$ 85.00$ 7,650.00$ 65.00$ 5,850.00$ 82.00$ 7,380.00$ 73.00$ 6,570.00$ 60.00$ 5,400.00$ 46 464-6018 RC PIPE (CL IV)(24 IN)64 LF 120.00$ 7,680.00$ 86.00$ 5,504.00$ 95.00$ 6,080.00$ 74.00$ 4,736.00$ 82.00$ 5,248.00$ 81.00$ 5,184.00$ 68.00$ 4,352.00$ 47 464-6020 RC PIPE (CL IV) (36 IN)193 LF 155.00$ 29,915.00$ 120.00$ 23,160.00$ 110.00$ 21,230.00$ 110.00$ 21,230.00$ 105.00$ 20,265.00$ 130.00$ 25,090.00$ 100.00$ 19,300.00$ 48 465-6011 JCTBOX(COMPL)(PJB)(6FTX6FT) 1 EA 7,000.00$ 7,000.00$ 7,200.00$ 7,200.00$ 6,100.00$ 6,100.00$ 7,400.00$ 7,400.00$ 6,500.00$ 6,500.00$ 6,000.00$ 6,000.00$ 7,000.00$ 7,000.00$ 49 465-6158 INLET(COMPL)(PAZD)(FG)(3FTX3FT-3FTX3FT) 1 EA 3,200.00$ 3,200.00$ 5,400.00$ 5,400.00$ 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 4,150.00$ 4,150.00$ 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 50 465-6236 INLET (COMPL)(RWI)(TY II)2 EA 4,700.00$ 9,400.00$ 4,000.00$ 8,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 8,000.00$ 3,450.00$ 6,900.00$ 4,500.00$ 9,000.00$ 6,000.00$ 12,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 51 466-6005 HEADWALL (CH - FW - 0) (DIA= 24 IN) 2 EA 3,500.00$ 7,000.00$ 6,000.00$ 12,000.00$ 2,500.00$ 5,000.00$ 3,100.00$ 6,200.00$ 5,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 5,300.00$ 10,600.00$ 5,500.00$ 11,000.00$ 52 466-6101 HEADWALL (CH - PW - 0) (DIA= 36 IN) 1 EA 8,000.00$ 8,000.00$ 8,000.00$ 8,000.00$ 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$ 3,900.00$ 3,900.00$ 9,500.00$ 9,500.00$ 10,500.00$ 10,500.00$ 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 53 466-6180 WINGWALL (PW - 1) (HW=5 FT)2 EA 12,000.00$ 24,000.00$ 11,000.00$ 22,000.00$ 6,500.00$ 13,000.00$ 7,500.00$ 15,000.00$ 22,500.00$ 45,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 26,000.00$ 52,000.00$ 54 467-6148 SET (TY I)(S= 4 FT)(HW= 5 FT)(3:1) (C) 1 EA 8,000.00$ 8,000.00$ 12,000.00$ 12,000.00$ 4,500.00$ 4,500.00$ 6,000.00$ 6,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 17,000.00$ 17,000.00$ 17,000.00$ 17,000.00$ 55 467-6388 SET (TY II) (24 IN) (RCP) (3: 1) (C) 1 EA 1,200.00$ 1,200.00$ 2,200.00$ 2,200.00$ 1,400.00$ 1,400.00$ 1,860.00$ 1,860.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,500.00$ 1,500.00$ 1,500.00$ 1,500.00$ 56 467-6450 SET (TY II) (36 IN) (RCP) (4: 1) (C) 1 EA 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 4,800.00$ 4,800.00$ 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 6,000.00$ 6,000.00$ 2,200.00$ 2,200.00$ 4,200.00$ 4,200.00$ 4,400.00$ 4,400.00$ 57 496-6043 REMOV STR (SMALL FENCE) 1,424 LF 6.00$ 8,544.00$ 3.25$ 4,628.00$ 2.00$ 2,848.00$ 1.10$ 1,566.40$ 1.50$ 2,136.00$ 4.00$ 5,696.00$ 3.00$ 4,272.00$ 58 496-8040 REMOVE STR (SEPTIC TANK)1 EA 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$ 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 7,800.00$ 7,800.00$ 59 500-6001 MOBILIZATION 1 LS 615,000.00$ 615,000.00$ 450,000.00$ 450,000.00$ 500,000.00$ 500,000.00$ 250,000.00$ 250,000.00$ 400,000.00$ 400,000.00$ 317,000.00$ 317,000.00$ 240,000.00$ 240,000.00$ 60 502-6001 BARRICADES, SIGNS AND TRAFFIC HANDLING 12 MO 3,000.00$ 36,000.00$ 800.00$ 9,600.00$ 1,000.00$ 12,000.00$ 1,500.00$ 18,000.00$ 750.00$ 9,000.00$ 1,100.00$ 13,200.00$ 1,000.00$ 12,000.00$ 61 506-6002 ROCK FILTER DAMS (INSTALL) (TY 2) 464 LF 25.00$ 11,600.00$ 19.00$ 8,816.00$ 19.00$ 8,816.00$ 22.00$ 10,208.00$ 19.00$ 8,816.00$ 21.00$ 9,744.00$ 25.00$ 11,600.00$ 62 506-6011 ROCK FILTER DAMS (REMOVE) 464 LF 7.00$ 3,248.00$ 6.50$ 3,016.00$ 6.00$ 2,784.00$ 6.00$ 2,784.00$ 6.00$ 2,784.00$ 7.00$ 3,248.00$ 10.00$ 4,640.00$ 63 506-6020 CONSTRUCTION EXITS (INSTALL) (TY 1) 160 SY 15.00$ 2,400.00$ 13.00$ 2,080.00$ 13.00$ 2,080.00$ 15.00$ 2,400.00$ 13.00$ 2,080.00$ 17.00$ 2,720.00$ 14.00$ 2,240.00$ 64 506-6024 CONSTRUCTION EXITS (REMOVE) 160 SY 7.00$ 1,120.00$ 6.50$ 1,040.00$ 6.00$ 960.00$ 6.00$ 960.00$ 6.00$ 960.00$ 7.00$ 1,120.00$ 10.00$ 1,600.00$ 65 506-6038 TEMP SEDMT CONT FENCE (INSTALL) 7,141 LF 3.00$ 21,423.00$ 2.15$ 15,353.15$ 2.00$ 14,282.00$ 2.50$ 17,852.50$ 2.00$ 14,282.00$ 2.00$ 14,282.00$ 2.50$ 17,852.50$ 66 506-6039 TEMP SEDMT CONT FENCE (REMOVE) 7,141 LF 0.40$ 2,856.40$ 0.11$ 785.51$ 1.00$ 7,141.00$ 0.20$ 1,428.20$ 0.10$ 714.10$ 0.20$ 1,428.20$ 0.65$ 4,641.65$ 67 506-6040 BIODEG EROSN CONT LOGS (INSTL) (8") 68 LF 4.50$ 306.00$ 5.00$ 340.00$ 5.00$ 340.00$ 14.00$ 952.00$ 5.00$ 340.00$ 6.00$ 408.00$ 4.25$ 289.00$ 68 506-6043 BIODEG EROSN CONT LOGS (REMOVE) 68 LF 1.00$ 68.00$ 1.10$ 74.80$ 1.00$ 68.00$ 1.00$ 68.00$ 1.00$ 68.00$ 3.00$ 204.00$ 0.65$ 44.20$ 69 506-8001 ROCK (3IN-5IN) (INSTALL)6,745 SY 10.00$ 67,450.00$ 12.00$ 80,940.00$ 6.00$ 40,470.00$ 10.00$ 67,450.00$ 8.00$ 53,960.00$ 11.00$ 74,195.00$ 11.00$ 74,195.00$ 70 506-8002 ROCK (3IN-5IN) (REMOVE)6,745 SY 5.00$ 33,725.00$ 4.00$ 26,980.00$ 2.00$ 13,490.00$ 4.00$ 26,980.00$ 3.00$ 20,235.00$ 6.00$ 40,470.00$ 9.00$ 60,705.00$ 71 529-6008 CONC CURB & GUTTER (TY II) 702 LF 18.00$ 12,636.00$ 25.00$ 17,550.00$ 17.00$ 11,934.00$ 13.00$ 9,126.00$ 12.00$ 8,424.00$ 12.00$ 8,424.00$ 16.00$ 11,232.00$ 72 540-6001 MTL W-BEAM GD FEN (TIM POST) 88 LF 20.00$ 1,760.00$ 21.00$ 1,848.00$ 25.00$ 2,200.00$ 21.00$ 1,848.00$ 20.00$ 1,760.00$ 25.00$ 2,200.00$ 30.00$ 2,640.00$ 73 540-6006 MTL BEAM GD FEN TRANS (THRIE-BEAM) 3 EA 1,500.00$ 4,500.00$ 1,250.00$ 3,750.00$ 1,300.00$ 3,900.00$ 1,200.00$ 3,600.00$ 1,200.00$ 3,600.00$ 1,100.00$ 3,300.00$ 1,600.00$ 4,800.00$ 74 540-6016 DOWNSTREAM ANCHOR TERMINAL SECTION 1 EA 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 900.00$ 900.00$ 975.00$ 975.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,100.00$ 1,100.00$ 995.00$ 995.00$ 75 540-6018 MTL BM GD FEN TRANS (NON - SYM) 1 EA 700.00$ 700.00$ 575.00$ 575.00$ 500.00$ 500.00$ 525.00$ 525.00$ 600.00$ 600.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 550.00$ 550.00$ 76 544-6001 GUARDRAIL END TREATMENT (INSTALL) 3 EA 2,300.00$ 6,900.00$ 2,500.00$ 7,500.00$ 2,000.00$ 6,000.00$ 2,400.00$ 7,200.00$ 2,500.00$ 7,500.00$ 2,400.00$ 7,200.00$ 2,500.00$ 7,500.00$ 77 552-8001 WIRE FENCE 5,460 LF 7.00$ 38,220.00$ 9.00$ 49,140.00$ 9.00$ 49,140.00$ 11.00$ 60,060.00$ 8.50$ 46,410.00$ 13.00$ 70,980.00$ 16.30$ 88,998.00$ 78 552-8002 GALVANIZED TUBE GATE 2 EA 1,200.00$ 2,400.00$ 2,200.00$ 4,400.00$ 1,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 1,500.00$ 3,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 1,200.00$ 2,400.00$ 1,215.00$ 2,430.00$ 79 618-6023 CONDT (PVC) (SCH 40) (2")3,531 LF 12.00$ 42,372.00$ 16.50$ 58,261.50$ 4.00$ 14,124.00$ 7.00$ 24,717.00$ 17.00$ 60,027.00$ 12.00$ 42,372.00$ 20.00$ 70,620.00$ Austin EngineeringJordan Foster Construction Joe Bland ConstructionEngineer's EstimateBID ITEM TECH SPEC DESCRIPTION BID QUANTITY UNIT MEASURE Cox Commercial ConstructionCapital Excavation Chasco Constructors Page 1 of 2Page 162 of 164 City of Georgetown 2017-0065-CIP - Southwest Bypass: Segment 1 Bid Tabulation June 27, 2017 UNIT COST AMOUNT BID UNIT COST AMOUNT BID UNIT COST AMOUNT BID UNIT COST AMOUNT BID UNIT COST AMOUNT BID UNIT COST AMOUNT BID UNIT COST AMOUNT BID Austin EngineeringJordan Foster Construction Joe Bland ConstructionEngineer's EstimateBID ITEM TECH SPEC DESCRIPTION BID QUANTITY UNIT MEASURE Cox Commercial ConstructionCapital Excavation Chasco Constructors 80 644-6076 REMOVE SM RD SN SUP&AM 9 EA 100.00$ 900.00$ 85.00$ 765.00$ 100.00$ 900.00$ 100.00$ 900.00$ 125.00$ 1,125.00$ 500.00$ 4,500.00$ 45.00$ 405.00$ 81 740-6005 ANTI - GRAFFITI COATNG (PERMNENT-TY III) 18,218 SF 1.10$ 20,039.80$ 1.03$ 18,764.54$ 1.00$ 18,218.00$ 1.00$ 18,218.00$ 1.00$ 18,218.00$ 1.00$ 18,218.00$ 1.00$ 18,218.00$ 82 1004-6001 TREE PROTECTION 88 EA 400.00$ 35,200.00$ 178.00$ 15,664.00$ 150.00$ 13,200.00$ 185.00$ 16,280.00$ 155.00$ 13,640.00$ 175.00$ 15,400.00$ 195.00$ 17,160.00$ NON-BID ITEMS TO BE INCLUDED IN BID AND CONTRACT AMOUNT 83 999-GT01 CONTINGENCY ALLOWANCE 100,000 DOL 1.00$ 100,000.00$ 1.00$ 100,000.00$ 1.00$ 100,000.00$ 1.00$ 100,000.00$ 1.00$ 100,000.00$ 1.00$ 100,000.00$ 1.00$ 100,000.00$ TOTAL COST ADJUSTED FOR CORRECTNESS 6,984,857.83$ 5,599,200.86$ 5,840,343.90$ 6,295,098.54$ 6,528,897.80$ 7,339,107.10$ 7,763,869.00$ ACTUAL BID PROPOSAL 6,984,800.00$ 5,599,200.86$ 5,840,361.90$ 6,294,944.44$ 6,528,578.40$ 7,338,775.20$ 7,763,869.00$ ADJUSTMENT DIFFERENCE 57.83$ -$ (18.00)$ 154.10$ 319.40$ 331.90$ -$ Page 2 of 2Page 163 of 164 TU2243 AccessRoute LYNDOCHPARK RIVERRIDGE POOL P r e c i n c t 3 !"#$3 5 IH 35 R A B B I T H I L L F O X H O L L O W W O O D V I E W R I V E R V I E W DEBORA W O O D M O N T INNERLOOP K R I S T I N A RIVERBO W T H O U S A N D O A K S R O C K M O O R S O U T H R I D G E R I V E R R I D G E W O O D S T O N E S I E R R A W A Y B L U E S P R I N G S AUSTIN RIVER WOOD B U R N I N G T R E E P I N O A K R I D G E R U N F O X LUTHER R I V E R DOWN R I M R O C K NORWOOD T A M A R A S U S A N A REDO A K S O U T H W E S T B Y P A S S W I L L IA M S O N C O U N T Y - P R E C I N C T 3 : Path: \\AUSW00\Jobs2\61272_WilcoDesign&PlanGEC\Techprod\GIS\MXD\EXHIBIT\Projects_Individual\Southwest_Bypass\Southwest_Bypass_Proj_LocMap.mxd Date Saved: 3/29/2017 SW Bypass (Segment 1) SW Bypass (Segment 2) Park Precinct Boundary River/Stream ^_P C T 4 P C T 1 P C T 2 P C T 3 W I L L I A M S O N R o a d w a y :Southwest BypassLimits:from IH 35 to RM 2243Proposed I m p r o v e m e n t s :Construction of a new two lane roadwaySubmitted B y :Williamson County 1 inch = 1,000 feet 1:12,00001,000 2,000500 Feet Page 164 of 164