Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda UDCAC 11.03.2015Notice of Meeting for the Unified Development Code Advisory Committee of the City of Georgetown November 3, 2015 at 3:00 PM at Williamson Room, Georgetown Municipal Complex, 300-1 Industrial Ave. The City of Georgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If you require assistance in participating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the ADA, reasonable assistance, adaptations, or accommodations will be provided upon request. Please contact the City at least four (4) days prior to the scheduled meeting date, at (512) 930-3652 or City Hall at 113 East 8th Street for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. Regular Session (This Regular Session may, at any time, be recessed to convene an Executive Session for any purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code 551.) A Call to Order B Consideration of the minutes of the August 4, 2015 and the October 6, 2015 meeting of the Unified Development Code Advisory Committee. Public Wishing to Address the Board On a subject that is posted on this agenda: Please fill out a speaker registration form which can be found at the Board meeting. Clearly print your name, the letter of the item on which you wish to speak, and present it to the Staff Liaison, preferably prior to the start of the meeting. You will be called forward to speak when the Board considers that item. On a subject not posted on the agenda: Persons may add an item to a future Board agenda by filing a written request with the Staff Liaison no later than one week prior to the Board meeting. The request must include the speaker's name and the specific topic to be addressed with sufficient information to inform the board and the public. For Board Liaison contact information, please logon to http://government.georgetown.org/category/boards-commissions/. C Ross Hunter wishes to speak to the Committee regarding his request for improvements to the UDC Advisory Committee meetings, including time, venue, and minutes, and his request to review and/or renew discussion on the minimum Planned Unit Development district size. Legislative Regular Agenda D Discussion and possible action regarding proposed updates and additions to the UDC General Amendments List for the 2015-2016 review period. Valerie Kreger, AICP, Principal Planner, and Sofia Nelson, CNU-A, Planning Director E Update to the Committee on future amendments to UDC Chapter 12 - Pedestrian and Vehicle Circulation. Jordan J. Maddox, AICP, Principal Planner, and Sofia Nelson, CNU-A, Planning Director Page 1 of 15 F Update to the Committee on future amendments to UDC Chapter 13 - Infrastructure and Public Improvements. Jordan J. Maddox, AICP, Principal Planner, and Sofia Nelson, CNU-A, Planning Director G Overview of proposed changes to the Development Fee Schedule for development-related applications. Jordan J. Maddox, AICP, Principal Planner, and Sofia Nelson, CNU-A, Planning Director Adjournment CERTIFICATE OF POSTING I, Shelley Nowling, City Secretary for the City of Georgetown, Texas, do hereby certify that this Notice of Meeting was posted at City Hall, 113 E. 8th Street, a place readily accessible to the general public at all times, on the ______ day of __________________, 2015, at __________, and remained so posted for at least 72 continuous hours preceding the scheduled time of said meeting. ____________________________________ Shelley Nowling, City Secretary Page 2 of 15 City of Georgetown, Texas Unified Development Code Advisory Committee November 3, 2015 SUBJECT: Consideration of the minutes of the August 4, 2015 and the October 6, 2015 meeting of the Unified Development Code Advisory Committee. ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: NA SUBMITTED BY: Page 3 of 15 City of Georgetown, Texas Unified Development Code Advisory Committee November 3, 2015 SUBJECT: Discussion and possible action regarding proposed updates and additions to the UDC General Amendments List for the 2015-2016 review period. Valerie Kreger, AICP, Principal Planner, and Sofia Nelson, CNU-A, Planning Director ITEM SUMMARY: The UDC amendment process sets out that the General Amendments List will be reviewed and adopted by City Council annually, after review and consideration by the UDC Advisory Committee. The primary responsibility of the Committee is to review and make recommendations regarding UDC amendments included as part of the General Amendments List. A draft General Amendments List is attached for the Committee's review and consideration as well as a list outlining the changes. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None studied. SUBMITTED BY: ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Proposed Updates to the General Amendments List Backup Material Draft 2015-2016 General Amendments List Backup Material Page 4 of 15 Changes to the General Amendments List for the 2015-2016 Review Period General Topic Requested Amendment Amendment Description UDC Section Requester Update the requirements of the Pre-application Process to reflect updates in current practice.Update the requirements of the Pre-application Process to reflect updates in current practice. 3.02.010 Staff Update the provisions related to the Development Manual process to reflect updates in current practice.Update the provisions related to the Development Manual process to reflect updates in current practice. 1.11 Staff Review the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Development Plan requirements for review. There is a very detailed list of items to be included in the Development Plan required for consideration of a PUD. Not all of these details are always needed or applicable. Staff proposes we look at this list and consider whether all are needed or appropriate.3.06 & 4.06 Staff Create a UDC section acknowledging the city’s current annexation process.Formalize existing process, in keeping with State Law and the City Charter. Chapter 3 Staff Reconsider the current three acre minimum PUD size requirement.Consider smaller PUDs in certain circumstances or consider various levels of requirements and/or scrutiny based on size. Chapter 4Staff Reconsider the 25,000 square foot building limitation for retail and medical uses in the C-1 zoning district. Chapter 5 UDCAC Consider reducing the required setbacks in the Industrial District. Chapter 7 UDCAC Reconsider the residential fence street setback requirements and/or consider grandfathering allowances for replacement of existing fences. The street setback requirement for residential fences has created issues in existing neighborhoods where fence lines are not consistent and locational conflicts when replacing existing fences.8.07 Staff Parking Consider additional alternative parking space design options. Consider updating the parking space design options to allow for alternative designs that have been considered since the last update to this section.9.03.020 Staff Utilities Remove the Georgetown Utility System Advisory Board from the approval process for allowing septic systems. Currently, a request to utilize a septic system in lieu of tying on to a public wastewater system must go to the Georgetown Utility System Advisory Board for recommendation prior to City Council consideration. This amendment would remove this recommendation step and instead send these requests directly to City Council. 13.06.030.A.4 Staff Consider additional exceptions to fence height and assign Administrative Exception action to the Building Official. Expand the built-in exceptions for fence height to additional circumstances to allow more flexibility for residential fences. Additionally, the Building Official should be authority on further exceptions to fence standards as permits for fences are handled directly through the Inspections Department. 8.07 Staff Review the list of features currently allowed within the setbacks on residentially zoned properties to determine if additional features should be allowed. Reconsider setback features, including certain patios in front yards which many homeowners are seeking. Also, consider features in light of water conservation requirements. Clarification of driveway placement in setbacks, including circular drives.6.05 Staff Nonresidential Standards Clarify applicability of and consider expanding exemptions to building design standards. Review the applicability of the nonresidential building design requirements for clarity and reconsider exemptions to the section, including revising the exemption related to industrial uses in the Industrial District.7.04 Staff Review required setbacks for districts and consider expanding what may be allowed in the setbacks, particularly regarding parking. Review required setbacks for nonresidential district to determine if they are still appropriate in all cases, particularly when adjacent to other nonresidential districts or within the same development. Also consider expanding what features may be allowed in the setbacks and when, particularly regarding parking. Chapter 7 Staff Fences Staff Land Uses Reconsider some of the limitations applied to specific uses. Based on experience applying certain limitations listed within Chapter 5, some need further clarification or need to be reconsidered. These include civic use street access restrictions and building size limitations for retail and medical uses. Zoning/ Overlay Districts Consider whether the minimum acreage size for Industrial and Business Park zoning should be lessened. The existing minimum acreage sizes for Industrial and Business Park present challenges in certain areas where the zoning would be appropriate. Reconsider when and if the minimum size is appropriate.7.03 Staff Chapter 5 Staff Nonresidential Standards Requested General Amendments Completed Items Application Processes and Requirements Update the Site Plan provisions to provide clarity regarding revisions and to reflect updates in the process. Update the Site Plan provisions to provide clarity regarding revisions, as there is some confusion regarding when something should be handle as an Amendment to a Site Plan or a Minor Site Plan, and to reflect updates in the process including Site Plans incorporating Construction Plans. 3.09 Page 1 of 5Page 5 of 15 General Topic Requested Amendment Amendment Description UDC Section Requester Review the criteria for approval used when evaluating rezoning requests. Assist P&Z and City Council with consistent approval criteria lessen subjectivity and potential for challenge of arbitrary or unreasonable findings.3.06.030 Staff Consider withholding or limiting approval on applications when the property owner has unresolved City Code violations. Existing language in Chapter 15 is unclear if additional entitlements may be withheld for violations of City Code, even when there is a serious life, health, safey violation on a property.15.03.040 Staff Land Uses Review provisions and definitions related to Sexually Oriented Businesses (SOB) for consistency with the City’s Code of Ordinances. The City Code of Ordinances has provisions governing SOBs in addition to the UDC’s provisions. Some of the regulations within each document are inconsistent with each other and need clarification and revision.5.04 & 16.04 Staff Parking Review the paved surfaces currently approved for parking lots and consider additional surfaces. Consider an updated review of the materials or products that may be acceptable to meet the requirements for paved surfaces for parking lots.Chapter 9 Staff Update UDC regarding temporary signs for open house and model homes as may be necessary now that they are being enforced. Updates to the regulations governing Temporary Off-Premise Signs for Open Houses and Model Homes may be necessary to address any changes in current city operations since the regulations were written.10.07.050 Staff Impervious Coverage Consider bonuses for rain collection and other non-runoff alternatives.Explore new alternatives and waivers for residential and non-residential for rain collection, etc. Chapter 11 Staff Nonconforming Refine the UDC regulations regarding expansion of a nonconforming structure. Consider refining provisions applicable to the expansion of buildings that do not conform to current requirements for clarification and flexibility.14.04.080 Staff Zucker Systems Study Update various provisions of the UDC as may be necessary based on a pending recommendations from the consultant’s study of city operations. Update various provisions of the UDC as may be necessary based on a pending recommendations from the consultant’s study of city operations.Various Staff Land Uses Review the current accessory dwelling unit regulations regarding garage apartment rental. Accessory dwelling units have become more and more popular and accepted in other cities around the area and country. Staff has been approached many times by citizens interested in having a garage apartment either for personal reasons such as elder care or for rental purposes. Clarification is needed regarding what may constitute rental as well as a fresh look at the concerns or challenges of the rental of accessory dwelling units. 5.02.020.B Staff Consider expanding the roadway types on which high profile monument signs may be located. High Profile Monument signs are currently allowed only on I-35, 195 and 130. Other regional roadways that will be high-speed with expanded rights-of-way (e.g. 29 west, 1460, Bypass/Sam Houston) may also warrant taller, architecturally sound identification signage. 10.06 Staff Clarify application of maximum sign area in Table 10.06.010.The current language in Table 10.06.010 has caused some applicants to believe the maximum sign area is per sign, with no limit on the number of signs.10.06.010 Staff Consider increasing Subdivision Entry Sign size and height on major thoroughfares The City’s subdivision entry sign regulations require small entry signs. On high-speed major thoroughfares (SH 29, 2243, 195, etc.) large residential subdivisions are asking for taller and larger signage for identification.10.06 Staff Staff Revise Housing Diversity standards and separate attainability (affordability) separate from diversity. Allow development standard alternatives that will incentivize work force housing without requiring a variety of housing types and expand incentives to include multifamily housing.6.07.020 Staff 10.03 Signs Review temporary banner regulations to update event banner provisions and address temporary banner approval. Review temporary banner regulations to update event banner provisions as they are no longer allowed across streets and to address temporary banner approval downtown.10.07 Staff Residential Standards Review the current accessory structure requirements for clarity and consider adding exceptions. Staff has run into some challenges applying and interpreting the residential accessory structure requirements, particularly with regard to the height and size limitations.6.06.010 Staff Signs Consider updates to address whether various attention seeking devices or structures are signage, including subdivision entry features. Provide some clarification as to when certain features or devices should be considered signage and to what extent. More and more residential subdivisions (and some non-residential) are seeking to identify their development through architectural features and monuments (e.g. stone towers, windmills, cisterns, walls, etc.). Additionally, there are regularly new methods of attracting attention to a location that have been presented to staff that need clarification within the code as to whether it is signage or not. Items to Remove from List Pending Items Application Processes and Requirements Page 2 of 5Page 6 of 15 General Topic Requested Amendment Amendment Description UDC Section Requester Create a process to address requests for vesting determinations. Vesting claims have been presented to the city occasionally over the past few years, but with no defined procedures for addressing. These requests will likely increase over the next few years as the city has adopted new regulations that will apply to some existing developments. Chapter 3 Staff Reconsider how the current Gateway Overlay districts are being used. Currently, the Gateway Overlay districts only provide for additional landscaping along the frontages of these roads. Staff would like to explore utilizing these districts to address other issues that have presented over the last couple of years such as land uses or design. 4.13 Staff Reconsider allowing "Contractor Services Limited", "Contractor Services General", and "Office Warehouse" Specific Uses in the C-3 zoning district.Chapter 5 Public Acknowledge mobile food trailers as a use within the UDC and outline appropriate regulations governing.Mobile food trailers have increased in popularity and the city’s codes should be updated to address them. 3.11 & 5.08 Staff Provide better clarification regarding when a use is considered an accessory use and when it is considered an additional primary use. There has been some question in the past when more than one use is proposed on the same property or with the same business as to whether the use should be treated as an accessory use to the primary use or whether it should be handled as another primary use on the property. Also, clarity with regards to the standards that the accessory use must adhere to should be provided as well. 5.01.020 Staff Residential Standards Review and update Conservation Subdivision standards to encourage usage. Update conservation subdivision section to relax restrictions and incentivize its use. Consider in light of salamander listing and water conservation ordinance standards.11.06 Staff Review current requirements for screening of mechanical equipment for options or exceptions.There are difficulties in applying the screening requirements in every situation. More exemptions or options are needed. 8.04.070.C Staff Review temporary banner regulations to consider subdivision banners Review temporary banner regulations to consider internal subdivision banners. 10.07 Staff Reconsider maximum height for monument signs when landscaping is incorporated.Consider allowing an increase in maximum height permitted for monument signs when landscaping is incorporated at the base. 10.06 Staff Consider updating the list of Specific Uses in Chapter 5 to include various uses that are not currently listed. Items to Carry Over 3.08.070 Staff is regularly presented with questions regarding the possibility of allowing different uses in districts they are not otherwise allowed in and would like to address some of these through the public process in the next round of updates to the UDC. Examples include allowing stand-alone medical offices in the Industrial district and whether recreational vehicles (RVs) should be allowed as primary quarters in the Agriculture district. Landscaping Clarify application and calculation of landscaping requirements. Based on experience with the provisions, staff has recognized the need to clarify the application of the street yard landscaping requirements to projects located a great distance from the street as well as phased projects since, as written street yard landscaping applies to yards defined by buildings, not areas. Additionally, clarification is needed regarding what areas are to be included or not included in various landscape calculations. 8.04.030 Review current nonresidential landscaping requirements with regard to the city’s water conservation efforts. Consider updates to the nonresidential landscaping requirements to address the ongoing drought conditions and incorporate provisions to address water conservation efforts.8.04 Staff Staff Staff Staff StaffChapter 5 StaffChapter 5 Zoning/ Overlay Districts Review Courthouse View Protection Overlay district requirements for clarity and completeness. The Courthouse View Overlay provisions should be reviewed to make sure they are complete, that there are no missing steps, and that the specifics of how to apply this overlay are clear.4.12 Consider changes to the zoning districts various Specific Uses may be permitted in. Over time new uses are presented to staff that are not specifically addressed in the UDC. Examples include self-service machines (ice) and storage yards. Review and update Preliminary Plat phasing provisions based on experience. For larger tracts, consider a preliminary process such as a concept plan that creates long-term expectations for utilities, transportation, public facilities, parks, etc. without requiring plat-level engineering and detail. Consider minimum acreage sizes for preliminary plats and/or concept plans. Protect street connectivity between subdivisions by having more global plans. Application Processes and Requirements Review the Special Use Permit (SUP) Conceptual Site Plan requirements for review. There is a very detailed list of items to be included on the Conceptual Site Plan required for consideration of an SUP. Not all of these details are needed or applicable to all types of SUPs. Staff proposes we look at this list and consider whether all are needed or appropriate. 3.07 Staff Expand development agreement language establishing clear requirements and processes. Upcoming policies for procedures and consideration of special districts and development agreements are anticipated and would require UDC amendments to implement.3.2 Staff Signs Subdivision/ Platting Review current exemptions to platting requirements for clarity.Update subdivision language to reflect case law, attorney general opinions and correct confusion between 3.08.020 and 3.08.010 E relative to division of land for the purposes sale versus division of land for development.3.08.020 Staff Land Uses Add or amend standard conditions of approval for Special Use Permits required for specific uses. Staff proposes adding standard conditions of approval to Special Use Permits that currently do not have any and possibly refining some of the conditions for those that do in order to provide better direction to applicants.StaffChapter 5 Page 3 of 5Page 7 of 15 General Topic Requested Amendment Amendment Description UDC Section Requester Update the UDC based on the pending updates to the Overall Transportation Plan.Update various provisions of the UDC as may be necessary based on pending updates to the Overall Transportation Plan. Chapter 12 Staff Review access requirements on numbered county roads. Review access requirements on numbered county roads to determine if any additional provisions should be considered. 13.04.030 Staff Address naming policies related to private streets and drives internal to multi-tract developments. Consider applying the city’s street naming requirements for public streets to private driveways/streets that serve more than one internal tract in order to address 911 issues identifying emergency locations.12.03 & 12.04 Staff Special Districts Review special district procedures and approval criteria The City is currently reconsidering its policy on special districts in light of an overwhelming number of requests and unique situations. Update 13.10 to reflect new policies and procedures.13.10 and 3.20 Staff Refine the UDC regulations regarding abandonment of a nonconforming situation.Based on experiences with the provisions, staff would like to provide better clarity regarding the determination of abandonment. 14.01.060 Staff Alternative Energy/ Green Building Provisions Update codes to provide provisions for green building strategies and ensure regulations do not unintentionally prohibit such strategies The UDC should be reviewed to ensure there are not unintentional barriers to utilization of sustainable energy, such as requiring solar energy panels to be screened.Various Staff Update various provisions of the UDC as may be necessary based on updates to the Downtown Master Plan.Update various provisions of the UDC as may be necessary based on updates to the Downtown Master Plan. Various Staff Consider adding limitations to certain uses to create a "transition zone" between the Downtown and Old Town overlays. Consider adding limitations to certain uses along the edge of the Downtown Overlay that are adjacent to residential uses outside the overlay to create a "transition zone" between the Downtown and Old Town overlays.Chapter 5 Public Consider creating additional design standards for residential infill construction in the Old Town Overlay District When the most recent update to the Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines were approved City Council in 2012, Council requested staff bring back options for additional standards and review of new residential construction in the historic overlay districts. In August of 2014, City Council held a workshop on residential infill design standards and directed staff to place the topic on the UDC Amendment List for review. The goal is to create a set of standards for design of new residential structures that would preserve the character of the Old Town Overlay District. Chapter 6 City Council A subcommittee of the Parks & Recreation Board has been created that is tasked with reviewing and providing recommended changes regarding the city’s parkland provisions and policies. When implementing new OTP (pending) and Fire Code (approved), consider new standard, alternative and contextual street cross sections that account for public safety needs, traffic requirements and needs of private property in relation to public streets. Also, there are current inconsistencies between current OTP design standards and the current UDC design standards. Additionally, the city’s standards should be reviewed against Williamson County’s standards to address inconsistencies, especially related to any HB 1445 Agreement issues or potential updates. Staff Staff Review sidewalk extension and design provisions.Review sidewalk extension and design provisions and consider updates as may be necessary regarding upcoming Sidewalk Master Plan and Public Facility Access Audit. Additionally, the residential sidewalk fund provisions should be reviewed.12.02 Nonconforming Define process for determining nonconforming status and consider if there are additional existing situations to exempt. Utilities Review and update of Chapter 13 provisions related to water and wastewater improvements and extension requirements. General review of language regarding utility improvements which have not been updated in some time, including extension policy for plats and site plans. Review for updates, clarification of current policy and terminology. Includes Rural Residential Subdivision criteria and standards. Also, update any regulations affecting provision of water in order to implement any changes that may result from the potential merger with Chisholm Trail Special Utility District. Chapter 13 Staff Staff Staff currently receives requests for determination of nonconforming status, particularly abandonment status, and the process for this determination should be clarified and included in the UDC.Chapter 14 Parkland Update provisions governing parkland dedication based on forthcoming recommendations by the Parks & Recreation Board subcommittee review. Transportation Review and consider updates to the City’s provisions related to connectivity (subdivision access points) between neighboring developments. Connectivity (subdivision access points) is extremely important to the function of our public safety and transportation network. In process, design, and implementation, the City has not received adequate connection points and homeowners complain when streets are connected. We need to globally reconsider the ratio, design, locations, and exemption process to protect traffic movement, public safety access and ability to use street facilities as planned. Chapter 12 Clarify what triggers the requirement for a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) and when an appeal may be made and review the improvements that are considered or required. The City needs to ensure we are adequately preparing for future roadways with plats, dedications and reservations. Clarification is needed regarding when Traffic Impact Analyses are required and appealed, and how right-of-way is being planned to implement the City’s Overall Transportation Plan, for example, adequate intersection right-of-way. Chapter 12 Consider updates to street standards to address current and pending inconsistencies between different agencies and documents. Staff Staff Downtown /Old Town Chapter 12, Sections 13.04, 11.06 13.05 Definitions Revise various definitions for clarity or add new definitions as needed. Staff has come across several definitions that need clarity or definitions that are needed to provide clarity in other sections of the UDC. Examples include clarification of street yard definition and consideration of the current contractor services, limited definition. In addition this would include any revisions to definitions needed for other revisions made to the UDC. Chapter 16 Staff Staff Page 4 of 5Page 8 of 15 General Topic Requested Amendment Amendment Description UDC Section Requester Reconsider subdivision plat extensions and reinstatements Consider removing or scaling back administrative extensions and reinstatements of subdivisions plats. The City extended the lifespan of subdivision plats in 2012 and provided flexibility on phasing of larger projects. Extensions and reinstatements are no longer necessary for subdivisions. 3.08.090 Staff Clarify the definition and application of the "Live Music or Entertainment" specific use Clarification is needed regarding the intent of the "Live Music or Entertainment" specific use in Chapter 5 as well as the limitations associated with the use, including the definition of outdoor entertainment.5.04 Staff Review and update outdoor display and storage regulations Review regulations pertaining to outdoor display and storage of merchandise, materials, and equipment. The existing regulations have presented challenges in some situations and are somewhat unclear in others.5.09 Staff Consider residential off-street parking requirements including garage setbacks in relation to street design Staff is working on amendments to the transportation section of the UDC, particularly street parking and street design. Considerations regarding minimum street widths and fire service needs for residential subdvisions will warrant study of off-street parking and garage setback requirements. 6.03 Staff Consider masonry requirements for single-family and two-family structures Consider adding masonry requirements for single-family and two-family structures, which do not exist today. 6.03 Staff Review the masonry requirements for multifamily and commercial buildings Review existing masonry requirements for multifamily and commercial buildings to ensure appropriate, sustainable, and visually- appealling materials are being used in the appropriate locations.7.04 Staff Review and update the current regulations regarding trash receptical screening The current provisions regulating screening of trash dumpsters do not take into account recycling and are often too small for the needs of the facility. Additionally, the UDC does not address locational requirements such as those affecting service truck access.8.04 Staff Consider allowing tandem parking Consider adding language allowing tandem parking in certain situations. The UDC currently does not contemplate tandem parking and more builders are starting to ask for its inclusion.9.03 Staff Clarify vehicle stacking area requirements for various uses The UDC outlines the minimum vehicle stacking spaces required for certain land uses such as drive-throughs, gas stations, and banks. However, how that is to be measured is not clear in all instances. Additionally, the number of spaces required should be reviewed and potentially updated. 9.04 Staff Reconsider allowing electronic signage In 2009 the City considered revisions to the UDC that would allow electronic signage in the City. However, the proposed amendment was turned down by both P&Z and City Council. Since that time, staff has continued to get numerous requests from the public to reconsider allowing electronic signage. This item would bring the topic back to discussion. Chapter 10 Public Potential New Items Page 5 of 5Page 9 of 15 Requested General Amendments for the 2015-2016 Review Period General Topic Requested Amendment Amendment Description UDC Section Requester 1 Create a process to address requests for vesting determinations. Vesting claims have been presented to the city occasionally over the past few years, but with no defined procedures for addressing. These requests will likely increase over the next few years as the city has adopted new regulations that will apply to some existing developments. Chapter 3 Staff 6 Reconsider subdivision plat extensions and reinstatements Consider removing or scaling back administrative extensions and reinstatements of subdivisions plats. The City extended the lifespan of subdivision plats in 2012 and provided flexibility on phasing of larger projects. Extensions and reinstatements are no longer necessary for subdivisions. 3.08.090 Staff 8 Reconsider how the current Gateway Overlay districts are being used. Currently, the Gateway Overlay districts only provide for additional landscaping along the frontages of these roads. Staff would like to explore utilizing these districts to address other issues that have presented over the last couple of years such as land uses or design. 4.13 Staff Reconsider allowing "Contractor Services Limited", "Contractor Services General", and "Office Warehouse" Specific Uses in the C-3 zoning district.Chapter 5 Public 12 Acknowledge mobile food trailers as a use within the UDC and outline appropriate regulations governing.Mobile food trailers have increased in popularity and the city’s codes should be updated to address them. 3.11 & 5.08 Staff 13 Provide better clarification regarding when a use is considered an accessory use and when it is considered an additional primary use. There has been some question in the past when more than one use is proposed on the same property or with the same business as to whether the use should be treated as an accessory use to the primary use or whether it should be handled as another primary use on the property. Also, clarity with regards to the standards that the accessory use must adhere to should be provided as well. 5.01.020 Staff 14 Clarify the definition and application of the "Live Music or Entertainment" specific use Clarification is needed regarding the intent of the "Live Music or Entertainment" specific use in Chapter 5 as well as the limitations associated with the use, including the definition of outdoor entertainment.5.04 Staff 15 Review and update outdoor display and storage regulations Review regulations pertaining to outdoor display and storage of merchandise, materials, and equipment. The existing regulations have presented challenges in some situations and are somewhat unclear in others.5.09 Staff 16 Review and update Conservation Subdivision standards to encourage usage. Update conservation subdivision section to relax restrictions and incentivize its use. Consider in light of salamander listing and water conservation ordinance standards.11.06 Staff 17 Consider masonry requirements for single-family and two-family structures Consider adding masonry requirements for single-family and two-family structures, which do not exist today. 6.03 Staff 18 Consider residential off-street parking requirements including garage setbacks in relation to street design Staff is working on amendments to the transportation section of the UDC, particularly street parking and street design. Considerations regarding minimum street widths and fire service needs for residential subdvisions will warrant study of off-street parking and garage setback requirements. 6.03 Staff Nonresidential Standards 19 Review the masonry requirements for multifamily and commercial buildings Review existing masonry requirements for multifamily and commercial buildings to ensure appropriate, sustainable, and visually- appealling materials are being used in the appropriate locations.7.04 Staff Residential Standards Requested General Amendments Staff 4 Review current exemptions to platting requirements for clarity. Update subdivision language to reflect case law, attorney general opinions and correct confusion between 3.08.020 and 3.08.010 E relative to division of land for the purposes sale versus division of land for development.3.08.020 Staff Subdivision/ Platting 3 Expand development agreement language establishing clear requirements and processes. Upcoming policies for procedures and consideration of special districts and development agreements are anticipated and would require UDC amendments to implement.3.2 Application Processes and Requirements 2 Review the Special Use Permit (SUP) Conceptual Site Plan requirements for review. There is a very detailed list of items to be included on the Conceptual Site Plan required for consideration of an SUP. Not all of these details are needed or applicable to all types of SUPs. Staff proposes we look at this list and consider whether all are needed or appropriate. 3.07 Staff Zoning/ Overlay Districts 7 Review Courthouse View Protection Overlay district requirements for clarity and completeness. The Courthouse View Overlay provisions should be reviewed to make sure they are complete, that there are no missing steps, and that the specifics of how to apply this overlay are clear. 5 Review and update Preliminary Plat phasing provisions based on experience. For larger tracts, consider a preliminary process such as a concept plan that creates long-term expectations for utilities, transportation, public facilities, parks, etc. without requiring plat-level engineering and detail. Consider minimum acreage sizes for preliminary plats and/or concept plans. Protect street connectivity between subdivisions by having more global plans. 3.08.070 Staff 4.12 Staff 9 Consider updating the list of Specific Uses in Chapter 5 to include various uses that are not currently listed. Over time new uses are presented to staff that are not specifically addressed in the UDC. Examples include self-service machines (ice) and storage yards.Chapter 5 Staff Land Uses 11 Add or amend standard conditions of approval for Special Use Permits required for specific uses. Staff proposes adding standard conditions of approval to Special Use Permits that currently do not have any and possibly refining some of the conditions for those that do in order to provide better direction to applicants.Chapter 5 Staff 10 Consider changes to the zoning districts various Specific Uses may be permitted in. Staff is regularly presented with questions regarding the possibility of allowing different uses in districts they are not otherwise allowed in and would like to address some of these through the public process in the next round of updates to the UDC. Examples include allowing stand-alone medical offices in the Industrial district and whether recreational vehicles (RVs) should be allowed as primary quarters in the Agriculture district. Chapter 5 Staff Page 1 of 3Page 10 of 15 General Topic Requested Amendment Amendment Description UDC Section Requester 20 Review current requirements for screening of mechanical equipment for options or exceptions.There are difficulties in applying the screening requirements in every situation. More exemptions or options are needed. 8.04.070.C Staff 23 Review and update the current regulations regarding trash receptical screening The current provisions regulating screening of trash dumpsters do not take into account recycling and are often too small for the needs of the facility. Additionally, the UDC does not address locational requirements such as those affecting service truck access.8.04 Staff 24 Clarify vehicle stacking area requirements for various uses The UDC outlines the minimum vehicle stacking spaces required for certain land uses such as drive-throughs, gas stations, and banks. However, how that is to be measured is not clear in all instances. Additionally, the number of spaces required should be reviewed and potentially updated. 9.04 Staff 25 Consider allowing tandem parking Consider adding language allowing tandem parking in certain situations. The UDC currently does not contemplate tandem parking and more builders are starting to ask for its inclusion.9.03 Staff 26 Review temporary banner regulations to consider subdivision banners Review temporary banner regulations to consider internal subdivision banners. 10.07 Staff 27 Reconsider maximum height for monument signs when landscaping is incorporated.Consider allowing an increase in maximum height permitted for monument signs when landscaping is incorporated at the base. 10.06 Staff 28 Reconsider allowing electronic signage In 2009 the City considered revisions to the UDC that would allow electronic signage in the City. However, the proposed amendment was turned down by both P&Z and City Council. Since that time, staff has continued to get numerous requests from the public to reconsider allowing electronic signage. This item would bring the topic back to discussion. Chapter 10 Public 29 Update the UDC based on the pending updates to the Overall Transportation Plan.Update various provisions of the UDC as may be necessary based on pending updates to the Overall Transportation Plan. Chapter 12 Staff 33 Review access requirements on numbered county roads. Review access requirements on numbered county roads to determine if any additional provisions should be considered. 13.04.030 Staff 34 Address naming policies related to private streets and drives internal to multi-tract developments. Consider applying the city’s street naming requirements for public streets to private driveways/streets that serve more than one internal tract in order to address 911 issues identifying emergency locations.12.03 & 12.04 Staff Landscaping 21 Clarify application and calculation of landscaping requirements. Based on experience with the provisions, staff has recognized the need to clarify the application of the street yard landscaping requirements to projects located a great distance from the street as well as phased projects since, as written street yard landscaping applies to yards defined by buildings, not areas. Additionally, clarification is needed regarding what areas are to be included or not included in various landscape calculations. 8.04.030 Staff 22 Review current nonresidential landscaping requirements with regard to the city’s water conservation efforts. Consider updates to the nonresidential landscaping requirements to address the ongoing drought conditions and incorporate provisions to address water conservation efforts.8.04 Staff Chapter 12, Sections 13.04, 11.06 Staff 12.02 Staff Chapter 12 Staff Chapter 12 Staff Transportation 35 Review sidewalk extension and design provisions. Review sidewalk extension and design provisions and consider updates as may be necessary regarding upcoming Sidewalk Master Plan and Public Facility Access Audit. Additionally, the residential sidewalk fund provisions should be reviewed. 32 Consider updates to street standards to address current and pending inconsistencies between different agencies and documents. When implementing new OTP (pending) and Fire Code (approved), consider new standard, alternative and contextual street cross sections that account for public safety needs, traffic requirements and needs of private property in relation to public streets. Also, there are current inconsistencies between current OTP design standards and the current UDC design standards. Additionally, the city’s standards should be reviewed against Williamson County’s standards to address inconsistencies, especially related to any HB 1445 Agreement issues or potential updates. 31 Clarify what triggers the requirement for a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) and when an appeal may be made and review the improvements that are considered or required. The City needs to ensure we are adequately preparing for future roadways with plats, dedications and reservations. Clarification is needed regarding when Traffic Impact Analyses are required and appealed, and how right-of-way is being planned to implement the City’s Overall Transportation Plan, for example, adequate intersection right-of-way. 30 Review and consider updates to the City’s provisions related to connectivity (subdivision access points) between neighboring developments. Connectivity (subdivision access points) is extremely important to the function of our public safety and transportation network. In process, design, and implementation, the City has not received adequate connection points and homeowners complain when streets are connected. We need to globally reconsider the ratio, design, locations, and exemption process to protect traffic movement, public safety access and ability to use street facilities as planned. Signs Parking Page 2 of 3Page 11 of 15 General Topic Requested Amendment Amendment Description UDC Section Requester Special Districts 38 Review special district procedures and approval criteria The City is currently reconsidering its policy on special districts in light of an overwhelming number of requests and unique situations. Update 13.10 to reflect new policies and procedures.13.10 and 3.20 Staff 39 Refine the UDC regulations regarding abandonment of a nonconforming situation.Based on experiences with the provisions, staff would like to provide better clarity regarding the determination of abandonment. 14.01.060 Staff 42 Update various provisions of the UDC as may be necessary based on updates to the Downtown Master Plan.Update various provisions of the UDC as may be necessary based on updates to the Downtown Master Plan. Various Staff 43 Consider adding limitations to certain uses to create a "transition zone" between the Downtown and Old Town overlays. Consider adding limitations to certain uses along the edge of the Downtown Overlay that are adjacent to residential uses outside the overlay to create a "transition zone" between the Downtown and Old Town overlays.Chapter 5 Public 44 Consider creating additional design standards for residential infill construction in the Old Town Overlay District When the most recent update to the Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines were approved City Council in 2012, Council requested staff bring back options for additional standards and review of new residential construction in the historic overlay districts. In August of 2014, City Council held a workshop on residential infill design standards and directed staff to place the topic on the UDC Amendment List for review. The goal is to create a set of standards for design of new residential structures that would preserve the character of the Old Town Overlay District. Chapter 6 City Council Alternative Energy/ Green Building Provisions 45 Update codes to provide provisions for green building strategies and ensure regulations do not unintentionally prohibit such strategies The UDC should be reviewed to ensure there are not unintentional barriers to utilization of sustainable energy, such as requiring solar energy panels to be screened.Various Staff Staff 13.05 Staff Utilities 37 Review and update of Chapter 13 provisions related to water and wastewater improvements and extension requirements. General review of language regarding utility improvements which have not been updated in some time, including extension policy for plats and site plans. Review for updates, clarification of current policy and terminology. Includes Rural Residential Subdivision criteria and standards. Also, update any regulations affecting provision of water in order to implement any changes that may result from the potential merger with Chisholm Trail Special Utility District. Chapter 13 Parkland 36 Update provisions governing parkland dedication based on forthcoming recommendations by the Parks & Recreation Board subcommittee review. A subcommittee of the Parks & Recreation Board has been created that is tasked with reviewing and providing recommended changes regarding the city’s parkland provisions and policies. Downtown/Old Town Definitions 41 Revise various definitions for clarity or add new definitions as needed. Staff has come across several definitions that need clarity or definitions that are needed to provide clarity in other sections of the UDC. Examples include clarification of street yard definition and consideration of the current contractor services, limited definition. In addition this would include any revisions to definitions needed for other revisions made to the UDC. Chapter 16 Staff Staff Nonconforming 40 Define process for determining nonconforming status and consider if there are additional existing situations to exempt. Staff currently receives requests for determination of nonconforming status, particularly abandonment status, and the process for this determination should be clarified and included in the UDC.Chapter 14 Page 3 of 3Page 12 of 15 City of Georgetown, Texas Unified Development Code Advisory Committee November 3, 2015 SUBJECT: Update to the Committee on future amendments to UDC Chapter 12 - Pedestrian and Vehicle Circulation. Jordan J. Maddox, AICP, Principal Planner, and Sofia Nelson, CNU-A, Planning Director ITEM SUMMARY: Recently, the City has adopted an update to the Overall Transportation Plan, a key component of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. In addition, the City has adopted the 2012 International Fire Code and a new Sidewalk Master Plan. These three plans require some measure of codification in the UDC in order to implement and clarify the larger policy goals approved by City Council. Chapter 12 of the UDC is generally focused on transportation design requirements, including streets and sidewalks for subdivision and site planning. There is a team of City staff working on updates to the code that include Planning, Fire, Engineering, and Transportation, and will involve the County as well. Staff hopes to have the first language proposal to the committee for discussion in December. The soft goal is to have final language for approval in March but that is subject to change depending on the public and committee response. Topics for future discussion include new and revised street cross-sections, street connectivity and access connections, pedestrian/bicycle standards and alternatives, and TIA requirements. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None SUBMITTED BY: Jordan Maddox Page 13 of 15 City of Georgetown, Texas Unified Development Code Advisory Committee November 3, 2015 SUBJECT: Update to the Committee on future amendments to UDC Chapter 13 - Infrastructure and Public Improvements. Jordan J. Maddox, AICP, Principal Planner, and Sofia Nelson, CNU-A, Planning Director ITEM SUMMARY: Chapter 13 of the UDC includes many of the utility infrastructure requirements for development, primarily public water and wastewater improvements. The chapter also outlines parkland dedication standards, fiscal surety for public improvements, and oversizing for regional pipelines on the utility master plans. This chapter also includes provisions for special districts, such as MUDs. Staff is currently reviewing the entire chapter for an overdue clean-up and restructuring. The list for future consideration by the committee includes when certain public improvements are triggered (by subdivision or other action), exemptions to improvements, rural subdivision requirements, and fiscal surety. Note - parkland and special district amendments are being prepared as a separate UDC item and will be considered by the committee in that fashion. FINANCIAL IMPACT: . SUBMITTED BY: Jordan Maddox Page 14 of 15 City of Georgetown, Texas Unified Development Code Advisory Committee November 3, 2015 SUBJECT: Overview of proposed changes to the Development Fee Schedule for development-related applications. Jordan J. Maddox, AICP, Principal Planner, and Sofia Nelson, CNU-A, Planning Director ITEM SUMMARY: The Planning Department last looked at the development processing fees for application submittals in March of 2010, when most of the current fee schedule was adopted. At that time, it was envisioned that these fees would be reviewed every three years. Since 2010, the fee schedule has been amended several times, primarily to add new application types created by UDC changes and to add technology fees to pay for MyPermitNow. A full review of individual fees has not been undertaken until now. Staff has been studying other cities' application fees, considering administrate costs and time spent on certain application, and general recovery costs for the department. Goals for this fee revision include a simplification of fee tiers, creating more similar fee costs for associated application, and simplifying those fees that have calculations based on size and intensity. Some fees will be increased and many will actually be reduced but the goal is not to raise fees arbitrarily or to simply keep pace with inflation across the board. These are targeted increases and decreases based on past experience with the development cases and the costs to the department of managing the workload. We plan to use the UDC Committee as a public forum when the final fee document is completed, both for feedback from the committee members as well as the public. No action will be required on the new fees. FINANCIAL IMPACT: . SUBMITTED BY: Jordan Maddox Page 15 of 15