Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda UDCAC 03.10.2021Notice of Meeting for the Unified Dev elopment Code Adv isory Committee of the City of Georgetown March 10, 2021 at 3:30 P M at Virtual T he C ity of G eorgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If you require as s is tance in partic ipating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the ADA, reas onable as s is tance, adaptations , or ac commodations will be provided upon request. P leas e c ontact the C ity S ec retary's O ffic e, at leas t three (3) days prior to the sc heduled meeting date, at (512) 930-3652 or C ity Hall at 808 Martin Luther King Jr. S treet, G eorgetown, T X 78626 for additional information; T T Y users route through R elay Texas at 711. The r egular me eting will c onvene at 3:30 p.m. on M arc h 10, 2021 via te le confe re nc e. To participate , please c opy and paste the following we blink into your browse r: Weblink: http://bit.ly/2 N 9 RVe d Webinar I D: 913-5575-4466 P assword: 043219 To participate by phone: Call in numbe r: (346)248-7799 or Toll-F re e: 888-475-4499 P assword: 043219 Citizen comme nts are acc epted in thr ee differ ent for mats: 1. Submit written comme nts to planning@geor getown.or g by 2:30p.m. on the date of the me eting and the Re cor ding Se cr etar y will re ad your c omments into the r ec ording during the item that is being discussed. 2. L og onto the mee ting at the link above and "raise your hand" during the item 3. Use your home /mobile phone to call the toll-fre e numbe r To join a Zoom me eting, c lick on the link provided and join as an attende e. You will be aske d to e nte r your name and email addre ss (this is so we can ide ntify you when you ar e c alled upon). To spe ak on an item, clic k on the "R aise your H and" option at the bottom of the Zoom mee ting we bpage once that ite m has opened. Whe n you are calle d upon by the Re cor ding Se cr etar y, your devic e will be r emotely un-muted by the A dministrator and you may spe ak for thre e minute s. P lease state your name clear ly, and when your time is over, your de vice will be muted again. Use of pr ofanity, thr eate ning language, slande rous r emarks or thr eats of harm are not allowed and will re sult in you be ing imme diately re moved fr om the mee ting. Page 1 of 116 Regular Session (T his R egular S es s ion may, at any time, be rec es s ed to c onvene an Exec utive S es s ion for any purpose authorized by the O pen Meetings Act, Texas G overnment C ode 551.) A Discussion on how the U nified Development C ode Advisory C ommittee virtual conference will be conducted, to include options for public comments and how the public may address the Commission -- Sofia Nelson, C N U-A, P lanning D irector B O n a subject not posted on the agenda: P ersons may add an item to a future B oard agenda by filing a written request with the S taff L iaison no later than one week prior to the B oard meeting. T he request must include the speaker's name and the specific topic to be addressed with sufficient information to inform the board and the public. F or B oard L iaison contact information, please logon to http://government.georgetown.org/category/boards-commissions/. At the ti me of posti ng, no persons had si gned up to speak on i tems not on the agenda. L egislativ e Regular Agenda C C ons ideration and possible action to approve the minutes of the F ebruary 10, 2021 regular meeting of the Unified Development C ode Advis ory C ommittee -- Mirna G arcia, Management Analys t D C ontinued from the F ebruary 10, 2021 meeting: P ublic Hearing and possible action on a proposed Text Amendment to the Unified Development C ode (UDC ) relating to the Tree P reservation and Lands caping s tandards spec ifically as it pertains to tree preservation, removal and mitigation, s treetyard, gateway and parking landsc ape standards, and sc reening and water cons ervation requirements (UDC G eneral Amendment No. 20-03) -- Andreina Dávila-Q uintero, AI C P, C urrent P lanning Manager, S teve Mc Keown, Landsc ape P lanner, and Ethan Harwell, S enior P lanner E Update on the Unified Development C ode (UDC ) amendment process, and the 2020 UDC Annual R eview P lan, S c hedule and Next S teps -- Andreina Dávila-Q uintero, AI C P, C urrent P lanning Manager Adjournment Ce rtificate of Posting I, R obyn Densmore, C ity S ecretary for the C ity of G eorgetown, Texas, do hereby c ertify that this Notic e of Meeting was posted at C ity Hall, 808 Martin Luther King Jr. S treet, G eorgetown, T X 78626, a plac e readily acc es s ible to the general public as required by law, on the _____ day of _________________, 2021, at __________, and remained s o posted for at leas t 72 c ontinuous hours prec eding the s cheduled time of said meeting. __________________________________ R obyn Dens more, C ity S ec retary Page 2 of 116 City of Georgetown, Texas Unified Development Code Advisory Committee March 10, 2021 S UB J E C T: C onsideration and pos s ible ac tion to approve the minutes of the F ebruary 10, 2021 regular meeting of the Unified Development C ode Advisory C ommittee -- Mirna G arc ia, Management Analyst IT E M S UMMARY: F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: . S UB MIT T E D B Y: Mirna G arcia, Management Analys t AT TAC H ME N T S: Description Type minutes Backup Material Page 3 of 116 UDC Advisory Committee 1 February 10, 2021 City of Georgetown, Texas Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Unified Development Code Advisory Committee Meeting Wednesday, February 10, 2021 at 3:30 P.M. Teleconference meeting: http://bit.ly/3hMF9xC The regular meeting convened at 3:30PM on February 10, 2021 via teleconference at http://bit.ly/3hMF9xC . Webinar ID: 965 7551 6990. To participate by phone: call in number (346-248- 7799) or Toll Free: 888-475-4499. Password: 154623. Public comment was allowed via the conference call number or the “ask a question” function on the video conference option; no in-person input was allowed. Committee Member(s) in Attendance: P.J. Stevens; Brian Robinson; Jen Henderson; Tracy Dubcak Committee Member(s) Absent: Phillip Wanke, Brian Ortego, Stuart Garner Staff Present: Andreina Dávila-Quintero, Current Planning Manager; Mirna Garcia, Management Analyst; Steve McKeown, Landscape Planner; Ethan Harwell, Senior Planner, Brandy Heinrich, Development Account Specialist and Stephanie McNickle, Planning Specialist. Meeting called to order at 3:35 P.M. Regular Session A. Discussion on how the Unified Development Code Advisory Committee virtual conference will be conducted, to include options for public comments and how the public may address the Commission – Sofia Nelson, CNU-A, Planning Director B. On a subject not posted on the agenda: Persons may add an item to a future Board agenda by filing a written request with the Staff Liaison no later than one week prior to the Board meeting. The request must include the speaker’s name and the specific topic to be addressed with sufficient information to inform the board and the public. For Board Liaison contact information, please log on to http://government.georgetown.org/category/boards- commissions/. Legislative Regular Agenda C. Consideration and possible action to approve the minutes of the January 13, 2021 regular meeting of the Unified Development Code Advisory Committee. – Mirna Garcia, Management Analyst Motion to approve the minutes with updates by Henderson. Second by Dubcak. Approved (4-0). D. Discussion and possible direction on proposed Text Amendment to the unified Development Code (UDC) relating to the Tree Preservation and Landscaping standards specifically as it pertains to tree preservation, removal and mitigation, street yard, gateway and parking Page 4 of 116 UDC Advisory Committee 2 February 10, 2021 landscaping standards, and screening and water conservation requirements. (UDC General Amendment No. 20-30) -- Steve McKeown, Landscape Planner, Ethan Harwell, Senior Planner, and Andreina Dávila-Quintero, AICP, Current Planning Manager Staff stated the purpose of the meeting is to consider providing a recommendation to City Council on the proposed Unified Development Code amendment that has been worked on for the past several months as a part of the annual review cycle. Staff reviewed over several items including Tree Preservation, Removal and Mitigation, Street yards, Gateways and Parking along with Screening and Water conservation. Staff also recapped the amendment review process. Staff stated that during their workshop session on February 9, 2021, the City council general agreed with the amendments being proposed specific to Tree Preservation, Removal and Mitigation. However, City Council asked to consider allowing smaller trees (smaller than 6 inches) to be counted as credit trees and to explore the option of allowing trees planted on residential lots as on-site replacement trees. Staff stated that the proposed amendments related to street yards, gateway and parking, and screening and water conservation were not discussed at this workshop session, and were continued to the next City Council meeting. Discussion regarding Heritage Tree removal in according to the state law requirements. Staff reviewed over comments received from the public. Discussion on Synthetic or artificial lawns that may be used in playscaped, sports fields, and other similar recreational fields, and areas that are screened form streets and adjacent properties. On residential properties, synthetic or artificial lawns shall be limited to the rear yard only. Discussion to allow artificial turf to PUE or other utility easements. Staff will review. Discussion regarding synthetic or artificial lawns shall be made of polyethylene or polypropylene. Residential properties may use a nylon material. Committee asked if we need to be specific to the material being used in case something better is invented. Staff stated the material standards help with heat retention and being able to clean it is much greater and it does not retain bacteria. However, staff stated they can add in “better than” in case a better product is available to the public. Chair Stevens opened the Public Hearing. No one came forward. The Public Hearing was closed. Motion by Chair Stevens to postpone any action on today’s item until after the City Council has their workshop and know what their full comments regarding the amendments. Second by Brian Robinson. Approved. (4-0) Adjournment Motion to adjourn at 4:07 p.m. Page 5 of 116 UDC Advisory Committee 3 February 10, 2021 _____________________________________ __________________________________ PJ Stevens, Attest Attest, Brian Ortego, Secretary Page 6 of 116 City of Georgetown, Texas Unified Development Code Advisory Committee March 10, 2021 S UB J E C T: C ontinued from the F ebruary 10, 2021 meeting: Public Hearing and possible action on a propos ed Text Amendment to the Unified Development C ode (UDC ) relating to the Tree P reservation and Lands caping s tandards spec ifically as it pertains to tree pres ervation, removal and mitigation, streetyard, gateway and parking lands cape s tandards , and s creening and water c onservation requirements (UDC G eneral Amendment No. 20-03) -- Andreina Dávila-Q uintero, AI C P, C urrent P lanning Manager, S teve Mc Keown, Lands cape P lanner, and Ethan Harwell, S enior P lanner IT E M S UMMARY: O n July 14, 2020, the C ity C ouncil directed staff to review the C ity’s tree pres ervation and landsc aping s tandards as a part of the 2020 UDC Annual R eview C ycle. T he purpose of these revisions is to addres s ambiguity, c onflic ts with other c ode sec tions , and challenges found in its implementation on several development projects . Tree P reservation standards are part of the C ity’s development s tandards for s ubdivis ions and development of property. Landsc aping standards as part of the C ity’s zoning s tandards for development of property. Relevant sections of the U D C include, but are not limited to: S ection 3.16, Adminis trative Exc eptions S ection 3.23, Heritage Tree R emoval P ermit S ection 4.11, G ateway O verlay Dis tric ts S ection 8.02, Tree P reservation & P rotection S ection 8.03, R es idential Lands caping S ection 8.04, Non-R esidential Landsc ape R equirements S ection 8.05, R eview & Approval P rocess S ection 8.06, P lant S elec tion, Ins tallation, & Maintenance S ection 11.02, Impervious C over S ection 16.02, Definitions To facilitate the review process for this amendment, issues that have been identified by the public , the UDC Advisory C ommittee and C ity staff were grouped into three (3) focus areas: 1. Tree P reservation, R emoval and Mitigation; 2. S treetyards, G ateways and P arking landsc ape standards; and 3. S creening and Water C onservation. T he specific list of issues reviewed and proposed to be amended for each of these three (3) focus area was finalized by the U D C Advisory C ommittee at their S eptember 9, 2020 meeting (Attachment I). T he proposed terms recommended to address each issue were discussed and finalized at the U D C Advisory Committee meetings on October 14, November 11 and D ecember 9, 2020 (Attachment I I). Attachment I I I includes a list of each issue identified, along with the current and proposed terms, and applicable sections that will be revised. Between January 19 and F ebruary 5, 2021, the City accepted feedback from developers, property owners and other stakeholders on the proposed amendments. Comments were provided via email, a quick survey, and in meetings with city staff. T he comments received have been included as Attachment V. Page 7 of 116 T he purpose of this item is to provide a recommendation to the P lanning and Z oning Commission and City Council on the proposed amendments, which have been included as Attachment VI . F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: None s tudied at this time. S UB MIT T E D B Y: Andreina Dávila-Q uintero, AI C P, C urrent P lanning Manager AT TAC H ME N T S: Description Type Attachment I - Specific lis t of Issues to be addressed Backup Material Attachment II - Summary of Discus s ions (Sep to Dec 2020)Backup Material Attachment III - Summary of Proposed Terms Backup Material Attachment IV - Es s ential Terms Backup Material Attachment V - Public Comments Backup Material Attachment VI - Proposed Tree Preservation and Lands cape Amendments Backup Material Pres entation Pres entation Page 8 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Regulations 2020 UDC General Amendments UDC Amendment No. 20-03 Tree Preservation, Removal and Mitigation Issue No.Relevant UDC Section(s) Issues Requestor TP.01 8.02.020 Consider establishing a threshold for identifying which multi-trunk trees must be included on a survey based on the DBH of the largest trunk. UDCAC TP.02 16.02 Consider adding a definition for tree branch and tree trunk. UDCAC TP.03 16.02 Consider adding a definition for “hardwood” and “softwood” trees as some might have different interpretations. UDCAC TP.04 8.02.020 Exclude all cedar (ash-juniper and mountain cedar) trees from the protected trees definition.UDCAC TP.05 8.02.020 Consider excluding ornamental trees from the definition of protected trees. UDCAC TP.06 8.02.030, 8.02.040, 8.06.040, 3.23 Clarify applicability of City approval for the removal of protected trees within a right- of-way or public utility easement and assessment of mitigation fees. Staff TP.07 8.05 Consider requiring a Tree Inventory for new projects and phased projects whose surveys need to be update after 5 and 10 years. Staff TP.08 8.02.050 Consider prioritizing the preservation of protected trees to allow flexibility in site design elements (I.e. parking layout, monument sign location). Clarify the existing process for Heritage Trees. Staff TP.09 8.04.040, 8.05 Consider establishing boundaries for calculating protected and heritage trees on projects (i.e. floodplain, ROW, Limit of Construction, Phase or Section specific) Staff, Public TP.10 New, 8.02, 8.05 Consider requiring additional information on the health of a protected and heritage tree to address disease control issues as it relates to tree preservation. Staff TP.11 8.02.040 Consider additional options for tree mitigation. Staff, Public TP.12 8.06.060 Consider altering the situations in which required landscaping trees can be removed – specifically related to signage. Staff Page 1 of 2Page 9 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Regulations 2020 UDC General Amendments UDC Amendment No. 20-03 Streetyards, Gateways and Parking Issue No.Relevant UDC Section(s) Issues Requestor SY.01 8.03.030 Use of artificial turf for single-family residential Public SY.02 8.04.030 Street yard requirements, particularly for projects with buildings at great distance from the road and/or phased projects Public SY.03 4.11, 8.04.030, 8.04.050 Applicability of Gateway landscape requirements (and how these relate to other landscape requirements) Staff SY.04 8.04.040 Landscape requirements for inventory lots related to an auto sales use Staff, Public SY.05 8.05, 8.06, 10, 13.03 Conflicts between signage, utilities and easements, and landscape requirements Staff, UDCAC Screening, Buffering and Water Conservation Issue No.Relevant UDC Section(s) Issues Requestor SBW.1 8.04.070 Screening requirements for alternative waste containers Staff SBW.2 New Review current nonresidential landscaping requirements with regard to the city’s water conservation efforts Public, UDCAC, P&Z Page 2 of 2Page 10 of 116 Tree Preservation, Removal and Mitigation TP.01 Discussion Discussion: • UDC requires all species to identify and measure all trees 12” and greater (UDC 8.05). • It takes time to identify and locate every single tree – should not include excluded trees. • All trees are typically required to be identified on the survey to not overlook any trees that may be protected • Another benefit is to know where the “trash” trees are located to know where improvements may better be located as opposed to areas where the protected trees are located. Follow Up Needed: • None Direction on Draft Solution: • Specify that the “excluded trees” do not need to be measured or identified. • Or, add the word “protected” prior to “trees” in the UDC standard. • Include in the survey if it may be used as some type of credit Direction on Final Terms: • Specify/clarify that the excluded trees include all cedar trees (Ashe juniper, Mountain Cedar, Blueberry Juniper, or Post Cedar) • Codify the method of measurement to determine the multi-trunk trees to be measured • Proceed as proposed (with Option B for TP.05) TP.02 Discussion Discussion: • Stem appears to have 3 different meanings • Hard to distinguish for multi-trunk trees • Height off the ground to consider a trunk v branch Follow Up Needed: • Revised definition of trunk and branch (does not use word “stem”) Direction on Draft Solution: • Add definition of “trunk” Direction on Final Terms: • Simple is good • How will this affect multi-trunk definition? • Include definition for branches and roots as these terms are included in the trunk definition TP.03 Discussion Discussion: • Using terms “hardwood” and “softwood” may be more vague – do not recommend using these terms Follow Up Needed: • None Page 11 of 116 Direction on Draft Solution: • Do not include these terms in the UDC – maintain current definitions • Using specific species in defining protected and heritage trees is recommended Direction on Final Terms: • Proceed as proposed. TP.04 Discussion Discussion: • There are a lot of varieties of cedar • Better to define the types of trees that we want to keep Follow Up Needed: • None Direction on Draft Solution: • Maintain current UDC list of excluded trees, which includes cedar trees Direction on Final Terms: • Proceed as proposed TP.05 Discussion Discussion: • Need to be included so they may be counted towards mitigation and credit trees • Identify a way to measure for certain multi-trunk trees (I.e. crepe myrtle) Follow Up Needed: • Bring back two options for consideration Direction on Draft Solution: • One way to measure ornamental trees may be by looking at the 5 largest trunks • EXAMPLE (Option B) CP with 4 trunks, largest trunk = 6 in X = largest trunk, n = no. of smaller trunks X + 0.5*n 6+(0.5*3) = 7.5” Direction on Final Terms: • Proceed with Option B TP.06 Discussion Discussion: • Look into creating a new tree removal permit so that a SDP would not be required. • Consider using a minimum size to determine when approval is required. Follow Up Needed: • Language that mimics heritage trees in the ROW and easements Page 12 of 116 Direction on Draft Solution: • Create a new removal permit for protected trees Direction on Final Terms: • Proceed as proposed TP.07 Discussion Discussion: • Include it as an option for new development and at the 5/10 year mark to better plan the site • Inventory also includes location of the tree on the site • Inventory are completed by arborist Follow Up Needed: • Identify if and when it will be required • Direction on Draft Solution: • Good to encourage the inventory and where it is beneficial Direction on Final Terms: • There are different stages of oak wilt – it may be difficult for surveyors to identify oak wilt if they do not have that expertise • Staff’s response: Trees identified as “dead” or “deceased” - identify if oak wilt is the reason for the tree health status • Add “if dead” at the end of bullet point no. 5; or additional language to specify when applicable • Consider inventory option for extraordinary conditions • Trees on a survey identified as “dead” or “deceased” need to be further evaluated to determine if it is oak wilt • Need clear definition of “Tree Inventory” and what the requirements are for the inventory • Combine bullet points 1 and 5 • Define/specify how you can reduce mitigation TP.08 Discussion Discussion: • Heading in the right direction • Address what happens if the tree dies (replenish requirement) Follow Up Needed: • None Direction on Draft Solution: • More detail Direction on Final Terms: • Definition for “stands” Page 13 of 116 TP.09 Discussion Discussion: • Floodplain – if not using for credit, do not need to include in survey • Floodplain – cannot be developed in, thus should not be included for mitigation • Floodplain – alternatively, developers may want to include these trees as credits if it allows other portions of the property to be developed Follow Up Needed: • Bring back examples for each possible solution to discuss at next meeting. • Alta • South Fork Apt site Direction on Draft Solution: • Need more info. Direction on Final Terms: • Developer – advantage that there are portions of property that can be counted/credited to allow more development in another portion • Look at option to give developers a choice to do either Option A or B • Another option may be to not count trees in the floodplain, but count double/higher credit within the developable area --> look for ways that incentivizes preservation within the developable area • Bring back Option C for consideration (provide choice it makes sense) • Consider effect it has on cost of housing (for all proposed amendments) Direction on Final Terms: • Clarify that the trees in the floodplain can be counted in your total number of trees, but that they cannot be used as credit trees for mitigation • What might happen if a development had an area of dense trees outside of the floodplain? TP.10 Discussion Discussion: • Requiring vs encouraging – every time something is required it increases price • Specify the value for encouraging tree inventory requirement Follow Up Needed: • Incentive options to discuss at next meeting Direction on Draft Solution: • Bag of options – create incentives Direction on Final Terms: • Look at TP.07 TP.11 Discussion Discussion: • Verify/work with Finance on details for reimbursement process • Off-site planting on common areas for residential subdivisions an appropriate option Follow Up Needed: • Work with Legal team to determine what City can require through deed restrictions • Options for tier process through an administrative process Page 14 of 116 • Other jurisdictions that allow credit for trees planted on street yards of SFR lots o Options from other cities o Examples of projects to evaluate • Options on different fees for mitigation depending on size Direction on Draft Solution: • Need more info. Direction on Final Terms: • Clarify that developer pays up front and can get credit later • Clarify greater than 12 but less than 18 • Georgetown should have a minimum of 3 classes TP.12 Discussion Discussion: • Street trees should not be allowed to be planted in front of the sign • Fee-in-lieu of as an option in the event a tree may not be planted elsewhere on site Follow Up Needed: • None Direction on Draft Solution: • Direction on Final Terms (Nov 11, 2020): • Clarify that it must be planted within the same landscape area (i.e. if in the street yard, it needs to be placed in the street yard) Streetyards, Gateways, and Parking SY.01 Discussion Discussion: • Artificial turf heats up quicker • No objection to allowance in the rear yard • Major concerns allowing it in the front yard • Should not be visible from the street. • Will not be maintained by property owners. Follow Up Needed: • Direction on Draft Solution: • Not recommended. • If allowed, should be limited to the rear yard only. Direction on Final Terms: • Include a standard that restricts artificial turfs within an easement • If limiting it to the rear, may not have any value to add maintenance requirements. Keep preferred turf standards. • Potential loophole – no permit required. Possible solution - include scope of work in the flat work permit currently issued by the City Page 15 of 116 • Address how impervious cover may be impacted (what is considered impervious cover) SY.02 Discussion Discussion: • Concern that requiring higher level at the street may create conflicts as other phases develop • Look at limits of construction as an option • 1 and 2 okay • 3 and 4 not sure Follow Up Needed (October 14 Discussion): • Example of thresholds and possible solutions Direction on Draft Solution (November 11 Discussion): • Option 2 – results in additional trees for smaller lots. Readjust numbers so that the smaller lots do not result in more trees. Run scenarios to compare requirements. Direction on Proposed Terms (December 9 Discussion): • Comparison were helpful – good with revised option 2. • Okay with implementation of option 3 SY.03 Discussion Discussion: • Goal is to make sure gateway area is heavily landscaped Follow Up Needed: • Direction on Draft Solution: • Proceed as proposed Direction on Final Terms: • Proceed with Option 2 for defining the boundary SY.04 Discussion Discussion: • Does exempting inventory lots meet the goal of the City? • Require shade structures? Follow Up Needed: • Direction on Draft Solution: • Recommend reconsidering exemption in a future UDC amendment • Look at definition of “inventory lot” Direction on Final Terms: • Proceed as proposed Page 16 of 116 SY.05 Discussion Discussion: • It may take away more developable land • May be 75% or may be 10 feet – look at percentage vs feet option (bullet point no. 2) Follow Up Needed: • Direction on Draft Solution: • Recommend having all possible solutions as “or” options Direction on Final Terms: • Proceed as proposed Screening, Buffering, & Water Conservation SBW.01 Discussion Discussion: • Concern with adding a company name. Follow Up Needed: • Direction on Draft Solution (November 11 Discussion): • Proceed as proposed • Do not use specific business when referring to locational standards for enclosures Direction on Proposed Terms (December 9 Discussion): • All good! SBW.02 Discussion Discussion: • Follow Up Needed: • Direction on Draft Solution (November 11 Discussion): • Clarify that “turf” means natural turf or turf grass • Do not add any provision that requires it, but that incentivizes it • No. 4 – look at it functionally Direction on Proposed Terms (December 9 Discussion): • Good with Term #2 – IC credit • Good with Term 3#, but clarify that sod = turf • Term #4 is good. Page 17 of 116 Proposed Terms - Validate direction on draft ordinance Proposed Terms Discussion: • Follow Up Needed: • Direction: • Terms are good, reflect work done. Public Outreach Public Outreach Discussion: • Follow Up Needed: • Direction: • Groups to Include in Survey: o Chamber of Commerce o Development Alliance o Think of new groups? Please let staff know before beginning of January. o Send reminder in “homework” email. Page 18 of 116 2020 UDC General Amendments - Tree Preservation and Landscape Regulations UDC Amendment No. 20-03 Page 1 of 8 Tree Preservation, Removal and Mitigation Issue No. Issues Current Terms Proposed Terms Relevant UDC Section(s) TP.01 Consider establishing a threshold for identifying which multi-trunk trees must be included on a survey based on the DBH of the largest trunk. On non-residential projects, a tree survey is required to include any tree 12 inches + in diameter. Change the tree survey requirement on non-residential projects to require all trees 12 inches + in diameter except for the excluded species. • Hackberry • Chinaberry • Ashe Juniper (cedar) – includes Mountain Cedar • Chinese Tallow • Mesquite Include educational material in the Development Manual on how to measure trees. Codify terms for calculating the multi-trunk diameter of a tree (refer to TP.05). 8.05.010.A.1 and 8.05.020.A.1 TP.02 Consider adding a definition for tree branch and tree trunk. No definition of the word trunk. Define Trunk as in Random House Webster’s Unabridged Dictionary, 2nd Addition as adopted by UDC 1.06 & 16.01: Trunk – the main stem of a tree, as distinct from the branches and roots. Include definitions for branches and roots Branch – a shoot or stem arising from the trunk. Root – The usually underground portion of a plant that lacks buds, leaves, or nodes and serves as support, draws minerals and water from the surrounding soil, and sometimes stores food. 16.02 TP.03 Consider adding a definition for “hardwood” and “softwood” trees as some might have different interpretations. The UDC makes no reference to “hardwoods” or “softwood”. Heritage Trees may only be trees of the following species. Protected Trees are any species of tree 12” or greater in diameter, save for the excluded species. Continue to not use terms “hardwood” or “softwood” Do not add or subtract to current list of Heritage Tree Species. Continue to allow Protected Trees to be of any species, except for the excluded species, to allow maximum credit for various types of shade trees and ornamental trees. N/A Page 19 of 116 2020 UDC General Amendments - Tree Preservation and Landscape Regulations UDC Amendment No. 20-03 Page 2 of 8 Issue No. Issues Current Terms Proposed Terms Relevant UDC Section(s) TP.04 Exclude all cedar (ash-juniper and mountain cedar) trees from the protected trees definition. Cedar is among the UDC list of excluded trees. These include: - Hackberry - Chinaberry - Ashe Juniper (cedar) - Chinese Tallow - Mesquite Maintain current UDC list of excluded trees. 8.02.020.A and 16.02 TP.05 Consider excluding ornamental trees from the definition of protected trees. Ornamental trees are allowed to count as credit trees for mitigation and as existing trees for landscaping requirements. Establish a ratio based on the size of largest trunk that is specific to ornamental trees, where all additional trunks will be considered at half the largest inch trunk size. 8.02.040.C.2.a.i TP.06 Clarify applicability of City approval for the removal of protected trees within a right-of-way or public utility easement and assessment of mitigation fees. Heritage Trees Protected in the ROW need no review for pruning when done by a certified arborist for work being conducted by a public utility provider. Heritage Trees may be removed with approval of the Urban Forester. Protected Trees are not included under this exemption. Mitigation is required for any tree removed. Continue current practices for Heritage Trees. Allow Protected Trees to be removed at the discretion of the Urban Forester. Make provisions to include it under the current Heritage Tree Removal Permit. Rename “Heritage Tree Removal Permit” to “Tree Removal Permit”. The trimming of any Protected or Heritage Tree within a public right-of-way or public utility easement within the municipal limits of the City per Sec 12.08 of the City Code (adopted Oct 27, 2020). 3.23, 8.02.030.B.3 Page 20 of 116 2020 UDC General Amendments - Tree Preservation and Landscape Regulations UDC Amendment No. 20-03 Page 3 of 8 Issue No. Issues Current Terms Proposed Terms Relevant UDC Section(s) TP.07 Consider requiring a Tree Inventory for new projects and phased projects whose surveys need to be update after 5 and 10 years. Tree Inventory is only encouraged, not required. Require the Tree Inventory when existing trees are to be credited toward tree mitigation requirements Require the Tree Inventory when a residential project is proposed to be planned and constructed in three or more phases. Require the Tree Inventory when a master planned development is to be established under a Planned Unit Development or Development Agreement. Require the tree inventory when alternative tree standards are being requested through a Planned Unit Development, Development Agreement, or Subdivision Variance. Require tree surveys to identify if a tree is infected with oak wilt if deceased. Tree Inventory = species, size, disease and type of disease, health of tree, % of canopy cover 8.05.010.A.1 and 8.05.020.A.1 TP.08 Consider prioritizing the preservation of protected trees to allow flexibility in site design elements (I.e. parking layout, monument sign location). Clarify the existing process for Heritage Trees. To protect a Heritage Tree any of the following may be varied: • Setbacks • Lot design standards • Building heights • Sidewalks • Lighting • Signage • Parking • Drainage criteria • Connectivity • Driveway separation • Utility extension Protected Trees may take priority over design and construction of public sidewalks Alternative Standards shall be approved by the Director for administrative applications and by P&Z for applications under their approval. Maintain list of possible alternatives for Heritage Trees and expand the same list to Protected Trees or stands of Protected Trees with a cumulative DBH of at least 20” or more. • Setbacks • Lot design standards • Building heights • Sidewalks • Lighting • Signage • Parking • Drainage criteria • Connectivity • Driveway separation • Utility extension Alternative standards shall be approved by the Director under the provisions for an Administrative Exception. 3.16.020.C and 8.02.050.B. Page 21 of 116 2020 UDC General Amendments - Tree Preservation and Landscape Regulations UDC Amendment No. 20-03 Page 4 of 8 Issue No. Issues Current Terms Proposed Terms Relevant UDC Section(s) TP.09 Consider establishing boundaries for calculating protected and heritage trees on projects (i.e. floodplain, ROW, Limit of Construction, Phase or Section specific) Existing trees within the entire project boundary (including floodplain or ROW dedication) can be credited toward the existing trees remaining. All trees within a property that has a floodplain may be considered for tree preservation and mitigation credit. • Trees within the floodplain may be counted as credit trees for purposes of tree mitigation • Credit trees preserved within the developable area may be counted at a higher ratio of 2:1 No trees shall be considered existing trees if located in an area proposed for right-of-way dedication/reservation where no public improvements are required to be constructed as a part of the scope of work. 8.02.030.F and 8.02.040.C.2.a.ii TP.10 Consider requiring additional information on the health of a protected and heritage tree to address disease control issues as it relates to tree preservation. Health information is only encouraged, not required. Require Tree Inventory to learn the health of a tree. Tree Inventory = species, size, disease and type of disease, health of tree, % of canopy cover 8.05.010.A.1 and 8.05.020.A.1 TP.11 Consider additional options for tree mitigation. Divide Protected Trees into two classes: Tree Size Mitigation Fee Protected (12” +) $150 Heritage (26” +) $200 Divide Protected Trees into three classes: Tree Size Mitigation Fee Protected (12” – 18”) $125 Protected (18” +) $175 Heritage $225 Removals in excess of the number of trees allowed to be removed = standard mitigation plus 50% Clarify that mitigation by “On-Site Replacement Trees” shall first be considered foremost, within site feasibility limitations, before other mitigation options. Developer shall provide a letter of intent which identifies the project trigger for when mitigation plantings are to be installed. • City will draft standard language to be included with letter of intent to address review of plantings and refund of mitigation fees paid, in whole or in part, following verification of on-site mitigation plantings. 8.02.030.E.2.b, 8.02.040.C , 8.02.040.C.4.b and c, 8.05.010.A.3, and 8.05.020.A.4 Page 22 of 116 2020 UDC General Amendments - Tree Preservation and Landscape Regulations UDC Amendment No. 20-03 Page 5 of 8 Issue No. Issues Current Terms Proposed Terms Relevant UDC Section(s) TP.12 Consider altering the situations in which required landscaping trees can be removed – specifically related to signage. Removed trees and mitigate for the size and species of the tree. Mitigation trees must be planted along the same side of the building or parking lot. Remove and replace with a tree or trees that will reach a similar size as the removed tree. • Grouping replacement tree(s) within the same required planting area where feasible (street yard, parking lot, gateway buffer, etc.) • Trees must be planted so that they will not impede signage visibility in the future 8.06.060 Street yards, Gateways and Parking Issue No. Issues Current Terms Proposed Terms Relevant UDC Section(s) SY.01 Consider allowing the use of artificial turf for single-family residential Artificial turf is not permitted in a single or two-family residential property. Artificial turf, when proposed, shall be limited to the rear yard only. When the rear yard abuts a local or collector-level street, artificial turf shall be limited to the area screened from view from the adjacent right-of-way. Artificial turf shall be prohibited within an easement. Include standards that define preferred artificial turf. Artificial turf must comply with impervious cover limitations. 8.03.030; 8.06.020.C.3 and 8.06.040.F Page 23 of 116 2020 UDC General Amendments - Tree Preservation and Landscape Regulations UDC Amendment No. 20-03 Page 6 of 8 Issue No. Issues Current Terms Proposed Terms Relevant UDC Section(s) SY.02 Consider establishing different or alternative street yard requirements, particularly for projects with buildings at great distance from the road and/or phased projects. Street yard requirements are determined by 3 different street yard areas: Street yard Size (sq.ft) Landscape Area # Trees # Shrubs <50,000 20% 1 / 5,000 sq.ft. 3 / 5,000 sq.ft. 50,000 – 500,000 20% 10 for 1st 50,000 sq.ft. 1 / additional 10,000 sq.ft. 30 for 1st 50,000 sq.ft. 3 / additional 10,000 sq.ft. >500,000 20% 55 for 1st 500,000 1 / additional 25,000 sq.ft. 175 for 1st 500,000 sq.ft. 3 / additional 25,000 sq.ft. Revise Street yard size thresholds to reflect sizes more commonly seen and updated planting requirements for each threshold Street yard Size (sq.ft) Landscape Area # Trees # Shrubs <10,000 20% 1 / 2,500 sq.ft. 3 / 2,500 sq.ft. 10,000 – 100,000 20% 4 for 1st 10,000 sq.ft. 1.5 / additional 10,000 sq.ft. 12 for 1st 10,000 sq.ft. 4 / additional 10,000 sq.ft. >100,000 20% 18 for 1st 100,000 2 / additional 20,000 sq.ft. 48 for 1st 100,000 sq.ft. 5 / additional 20,000 sq.ft. Create a street yard planting percentage option that focus heaviest plantings near the ROW. • Required for phased projects – to be completed in Phase 1 Screening and Bufferyard plantings are still in addition to all other requirements. 10% (Low-level) of street yard plantings located within 28 feet of building façade 30% (Mid-level) of street yard plantings located between Low-level and High-level planting zone 60% (High-level) of street yard plantings located between ROW & Mid-level planting zone 8.04.030 Page 24 of 116 2020 UDC General Amendments - Tree Preservation and Landscape Regulations UDC Amendment No. 20-03 Page 7 of 8 Issue No. Issues Current Terms Proposed Terms Relevant UDC Section(s) SY.03 Clarify the applicability of Gateway landscape requirements (and how these relate to other landscape requirements) Gateway standards do not apply when another zoning overlay district exists. Gateway overlay districts boundary are determined by: - Right-of-way line of each applicable roadway - Centerline of the roadway when conflicting gateway overlay districts occur Gateway standards shall apply when more stringent than the standard of any other overlay district Clean-up referenced code sections Gateway overlay boundaries extend up to a maximum depth of 100 feet from the edge on the right-of-way line on either side. 4.11, 8.04.050 SY.04 Clarify the applicability of landscape requirements for inventory lots related to an auto sales use “Vehicle display and sales areas” are exempt from the parking lot landscape requirements. Define “vehicle display and sales areas” as the area specifically reserved for the display and storage of vehicles actively for sale. These areas shall not include areas reserved for required parking spaces, parking of vehicles in service, or areas reserved for the storage of vehicles not actively for sale. 8.04.040.C SY.05 Consider measures or alternatives to address conflicts between signage, utilities and easements, and landscape requirements An Administrative Exception may be requested for an alternative Landscape design. When required shade trees conflict with signage or utility easement, one or more of the following options may be proposed to meet the requirement: • Ornamental trees, additional medium and small shrubs around monument signs may be used to meet required gateway shade trees at a ratio as defined below:  2 ornamental trees = 1 shade tree, or  1 ornamental tree and 20 small to medium shrubs = 1 shade tree, or • No more than 25% of the mature canopy size may encroach onto an easement, sign, or any other conflict point; or • Gateway landscape buffer shall extend a minimum of 10 feet beyond any conflicting easement. 8.06.030.D.6 Screening and Water Conservation Page 25 of 116 2020 UDC General Amendments - Tree Preservation and Landscape Regulations UDC Amendment No. 20-03 Page 8 of 8 Issue No. Issues Current Terms Proposed Terms Relevant UDC Section(s) SBW.01 Clarify screening requirements for alternative waste containers Dumpsters are subject to locational and design standards including distance from property line, placement on reinforced concrete pads, screening materials, gate materials, and features to protect enclosures from truck operations. Other waste and recycling container enclosures shall also be subject to the dumpster locational and design standards. Location of waste and recycling container enclosures shall also comply with the standards of the waste collection service provider. 8.04.070.D SBW.02 Review current nonresidential landscaping requirements regarding the city’s water conservation efforts Grassed areas are encouraged to be planted with drought resistant species such as (but not limited to) Bermuda, Zoysia, or Buffalo. 50% of plant materials must be low water users. Solid sod shall be used in swales or on 3:1 or greater slopes or other areas subject to erosion. Synthetic or artificial lawns or plants are not allowed. Continue to encourage grassed areas to be planted with drought resistant species such as (but not limited to) Bermuda, Zoysia, or Buffalo, when grassed areas are provided. Continue to require a minimum of 50% of the total number of plant materials to be low water user plants. • For every additional 10% of plants classified as low water users, an additional 1% of impervious cover, up to a maximum of 3%, may be granted. Continue to require solid sod in swales, and on 3:1 or greater slopes or other areas subject to erosion. For all other areas, sod shall be limited to the remaining percentage of plant material that are not low water user plants. • Exemptions: dog parks; open recreational/common amenity areas; parkland Allow artificial turfs in areas screened from streets and adjacent properties, and in accordance with the impervious cover requirements of the project. Artificial turf shall be prohibited within required bufferyards and gateway landscape buffers. • Include standards that define preferred artificial turf and maintenance requirements. 8.06.020.C.3, 8.06.040.F, 11.02.020.A.7 Page 26 of 116 Diameter Breast Height (DBH): A tree measurement at four and one-half feet above ground Critical Root Zone (CRZ): Circular region measured outward from the tree trunk identifying the essential root area that must be protected Protected Tree: 12”+ , non-excluded species Heritage Tree: 26”+, Varieties of Oak, Pecan, Walnut, Bald Cypress, Am. Elm, Cedar Elm, Texas Ashe, Southern Magnolia Credit Tree: 6” – >12”, non-excluded species Excluded Species: Hackberry, Chinaberry, Ashe Juniper (cedar), Chinese Tallow, Mesquite Essential Terms – Part 1 Page 27 of 116 Essential Terms – Part 2 Street yard: The area between any adjoining street right-of-way and existing or proposed building, the portion of which is closest to the right- of-way line. Gateway: Roadways within the City limits to be considered gateways into Georgetown of which properties fronting such roadways shall be subject to special landscaping and design standards. Shade Tree: The largest plants in the landscape that provide the overhead structure needed for shading and under which other plants live and grow. Page 28 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards UDC Amendments General Amendment No. 20-03 Public Comments received * Office Hours discussion * Survey response * Comment Letters Page 29 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards General Amendment No. 20-03 Page 1 of 2 Office Hours Public Comments/Feedback (January 19 – February 5) Friday February 5, 9:30am • Mitigation fees do not incentivize protection of trees or on-site replacement. Depending on tree species, it is more cost effective to pay the mitigation fee than to replace it with new trees when considering the cost of the tree plus labor. o Staff Response: A study of current mitigation fees may be warranted in the future. • Consider counting new shrub plantings, in addition to new trees, as credit for mitigation. o Staff Response: For Tree Mitigation requirements, shrubs do not meet the intent of replacing lost tree canopy or caliper inches. • Provide list of recommended tree species for areas along sidewalks/trails, tight spaces, parking lots, in front of buildings, etc. Certain tree species, as they grow, will cause damage to the sidewalk or other public/private improvements, or cover buildings that may want to showcase. Having a list of recommended tree species for these situations may facilitate design of site. o Staff Response: This is something that can be incorporated in the updating of the Preferred Plant list. Friday February 5, 10:30am • Landscape Architect (LA) agreed that Tree Amendments are good for Tree Preservation but can be frustrating when looking at large industrial site. o Staff Response: In agreeance • If existing trees in the ROW are not counted as existing, then do I still have to mitigate them? What about new Overall Transportation Plan (OTP) roads? Might this also extend to utility work? o Staff Response: Mitigation is required for removed trees within the R.O.W., Mitigation is required on OTP roads as well as utility work projects. This is a current requirement; no changes are proposed. • Third tree class is great for developers! Helps with costs on sites that may be former farmland and have been let turn fallow. These sites tend to have trees that land in the lower protected tree class. o Staff Response: In agreeance • Can the Preferred Plant List be updated to include more low water users? TAMU has a great low water user list. • Limits on turf in SBW.02 do not make developers happy, but would make LAs and designers happy. Can temporary irrigation be used to establish native turf species? o Staff Response: In agreeance on turf limitations; Current UDC irrigation requirements allow for 3 options; no changes are proposed to the requirements. Page 30 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards General Amendment No. 20-03 Page 2 of 2 • Synthetic turf would be great to not have to be screened. Especially true on playgrounds, sports fields, K-12 facilities, daycares, etc. – this creates safety issues. Some new glass and buildings materials can create heat that can melt artificial turf. o Staff Response: Screening requirements for playscapes, sports fields, and other similar recreational fields have been adjusted to not hinder safety issues. • In street yards, could we use more 3 gallon or 1-gallon shrubs to meet planting requirements? It can be difficult to find 5 gallons plants with heavy demand on suppliers. o Staff Response: Current UDC minimum planting requirements for shrubs are 1 gallon, no changes are proposed to the requirements. • Ornamental trees can still block signage. Can more shrubs be used instead of ornamenta l trees? o Staff Response: UDC would just provide flexibility on location on ornamental trees that should address this concern. Page 31 of 116 Amendments to City of Georgetown Unified Development Code Survey 1 / 2 Q1 Do the proposed UDC amendm ents addres s the identified is s ues ? Yes Q2 Are the proposed changes easy to unders tand? Yes Q3 Do you need more information? No Q4 If y es, pleas e prov ide y our c ontac t information below: no Q5 Please prov ide any additional comments below. Inc reas e how often pruning permits are rev iewed #1#1 COMPLETECOMPLETE Col lector:Col lector: Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link )(Web Link ) Started:Started: Tues day, J anuary 26, 2021 10:32:22 AMTuesday, J anuary 26, 2021 10:32:22 AM Last Modified:Last Modified: Tues day, J anuary 26, 2021 10:33:48 AMTuesday, J anuary 26, 2021 10:33:48 AM Time Spent:Time Spent: 00:01:2500:01:25 IP Address:IP Address: 69.7.160.14669.7.160.146 Page 1 Page 32 of 116 Amendments to City of Georgetown Unified Development Code Survey 2 / 2 Q1 Do the proposed UDC amendm ents addres s the identified is s ues ? No Q2 Are the proposed changes easy to unders tand? Yes Q3 Do you need more information? No Q4 If y es, pleas e prov ide y our c ontac t information below: Respondent skipped this question Q5 Please prov ide any additional comments below. Tree mitigation requirements s hould be allowed in lots . Protected trees are 12" and abov e, however mitigation c redits are only giv en for trees 18" and abov e. This inconsistency s hould be fix ed. #2#2 COMPLETECOMPLETE Col lector:Col lector: Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link )(Web Link ) Started:Started: Wednesday, February 03, 2021 4:05:05 PMWednesday, February 03, 2021 4:05:05 PM Last Modified:Last Modified: Wednesday, February 03, 2021 4:11:41 PMWednesday, February 03, 2021 4:11:41 PM Time Spent:Time Spent: 00:06:3500:06:35 IP Address:IP Address: 70.112.239.20870.112.239.208 Page 1 Page 33 of 116 Amendments to City of Georgetown Unified Development Code Survey 1 / 5 50.00%1 50.00%1 0.00%0 Q1 Do the proposed UDC amendments address the identified issues? Answered: 2 Sk ipped: 0 TOTAL 2 Yes No If no, pl ease expl ain. 0%10%20%30%40%5 0%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Yes No If no, please explain. Page 34 of 116 Amendments to City of Georgetown Unified Development Code Survey 2 / 5 100.00%2 0.00%0 0.00%0 Q2 Are the proposed changes easy to understand? Answered: 2 Sk ipped: 0 TOTAL 2 Yes No If no, pl ease expl ain. 0%10%20%30%40%5 0%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Yes No If no, please explain. Page 35 of 116 Amendments to City of Georgetown Unified Development Code Survey 3 / 5 0.00%0 100.00%2 Q3 Do you need more information? Answered: 2 Sk ipped: 0 TOTAL 2 Yes No 0%10%20%30%40%5 0%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Yes No Page 36 of 116 Amendments to City of Georgetown Unified Development Code Survey 4 / 5 Q4 If yes, please provide your contact information below: Answered: 1 Sk ipped: 1 Page 37 of 116 Amendments to City of Georgetown Unified Development Code Survey 5 / 5 Q5 Please provide any additional comments below. Answered: 2 Sk ipped: 0 Page 38 of 116 Page 39 of 116 Page 40 of 116 Page 41 of 116 Page 42 of 116 Page 43 of 116 Page 44 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards  General Amendment No. 20‐03  ***DRAFT***  Added language is underlined Page 1 of 6 Chapter 3  Deleted language is strikethrough  Chapter 3 ‐ APPLICATIONS AND PERMITS    ***  SECTION 3.16. ‐ ADMINISTRATIVE EXCEPTION    ***    Sec. 3.16.020. ‐ Authority.     ***    C.  The Director or Building Official shall have authority to consider alternative design plan(s)  or other uses or requirements for the following situations:     1.  Courthouse view overlay height exception (per Section 4.12.040).     2.  Alternative residential boundary wall (per Section 8.07.060).     3.  Alternative building design plan (per Section 7.04.070).     4.  Alternative landscape standards (per Section 8.05.050).     5.  Alternative parking plan (per Section 9.02.050).     6.  Alternative sign plan (per Section 10.01.090).     7.  Alternative fences (per Section 8.07.080).     8.  Change of use (per Section 14.02.030).     9.  Expansion of nonconforming uses (per Section 14.02.050).     10.  Postponement of required improvements (per Section 14.05.070).     11.  Heritage Tree or Protected Tree Preservation Priority (per Section 8.02.050)    Sec. 3.16.030. ‐ Approval Criteria.     To approve an application for an Administrative Exception, the Director or Building Official must  determine that the following criteria are met:     A.  That granting the Administrative Exception serves an obvious and needed purpose.     Page 45 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards  General Amendment No. 20‐03  ***DRAFT***  Added language is underlined Page 2 of 6 Chapter 3  Deleted language is strikethrough  B.  That granting the Administrative Exception will ensure an equal or better level of design or  land use compatibility as the otherwise applicable standards.     C.  That granting the Administrative Exception will not materially and adversely affect adjacent  land uses and the physical character of uses in the immediate vicinity of the proposed  development.     D.  That granting the Administrative Exception will be consistent with the purposes and intent  of this Unified Development Code.     Sec. 3.16.040. ‐ Expiration of Administrative Exception.     The Administrative Exception shall expire if the companion application expires, according to the  specified expiration in this chapter. If the Administrative Exception is a stand alone application  the approval will expire in 24 months, if the exception is not utilized in a manner consistent with  the approval.     ***    SECTION 3.23. ‐ HERITAGE TREE REMOVAL PERMIT     Sec. 3.23.010. ‐ Purpose.     The purpose of a Heritage Tree Removal Permit is to determine whether such a tree should be  removed based on its species, size, location, health, viability and its impact on the overall site  design. Protected and Heritage trees shall not be removed without first securing approval from  the City.     Sec. 3.23.020. ‐ Applicability.     A.  The provisions of this section shall apply to all property located within the corporate limits  and in the extra territorial jurisdiction (ETJ) of the City.     B.  The provisions of this section apply to all development subject to this Code, except as noted  below, whether or not there is an active permit for the project.     Single‐family or two‐family residential lots approved and platted prior to February 13, 2007,  are exempt from the requirement of a heritage tree removal permit. However, single‐family  and two‐family lots platted after February 13, 2007 are subject to the heritage tree protection  provisions in Section 8.02, which shall apply to the developer, and home builder and  homeowner. Not withstanding the preceding exemption, if a future change of use from a  single‐family or two‐family home to any other use triggers a permit under this Code then the  provisions of the Heritage Removal Permit will be required.   Page 46 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards  General Amendment No. 20‐03  ***DRAFT***  Added language is underlined Page 3 of 6 Chapter 3  Deleted language is strikethrough    Sec. 3.23.030. – Pre‐Application ConferenceReserved.     Pursuant to Section 3.02.010, a Pre‐Application Conference is required prior to the submission of  a permit application, unless the application is part of another project where a pre‐application  meeting has already been held or the Urban Forester waives the requirement.     Sec. 3.23.040. – Review Process.     Review of a Heritage Tree Removal Permit shall follow the administrative review procedures set  forth in Section 3.03.040, subject to the criteria for approval set forth below.     Sec. 3.23.050. – Criteria for Approval.     No Heritage Tree Removal Permit shall be approved unless it is determined by the Urban Forester  or their designee, that the proposed removal is justified, based on the tree species and site  conditions of the tree. In making this determination the following will be evaluated:     A.  Tree species;     B.  Tree size/number of trunks;     C.  Tree health and viability;     D.  Tree location;     E.  Protected and heritage trees to remain on site; and     F.  Whether the project can be developed without tree removal.    Sec. 3.23.060. – Submission Requirements.     A.  Statement of justification for tree removal.     B.  Copy of companion plat, Site Development Plan or concept plan for the permit or  authorization that required compliance with this section.     C.  Copy of tree survey, if applicable. If no tree survey exists, location of tree identified, tree  type, size, condition, etc.     D.  A photo of the treeʹs canopy and trunk, labeled with the corresponding tree number on the  companion tree survey, shall be submitted with the application for a heritage tree removal  permit.   Page 47 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards  General Amendment No. 20‐03  ***DRAFT***  Added language is underlined Page 4 of 6 Chapter 3  Deleted language is strikethrough    Sec. 3.23.070. – Responsibility for Final Action.     A.  The Urban Forester is responsible for final action on Heritage Tree Removal Permits.     B.  Upon receipt of the application, the Urban Forester shall inspect the subject tree and approve  or deny the application in accordance with the provisions of this section within ten working  days of the date of the application. Upon written request from the owner or the owner(s)ʹs  representative, said date for the Urban Foresterʹs final decision may be extended for a period  of up to 15 additional days. If a decision by the Urban Forester would delay construction that  is already properly permitted, commenced and in‐progress, the Urban Forester or their  designee shall approve or deny the application within two working days.     C.  An applicant may appeal a denial of a Heritage Tree Removal Permit to the City Council.  Such appeal must be made in writing and received by the Director within 30 days of the date  of the decision on the application by the Urban Forester. The Director shall set the matter for  Public Hearing before the City Council at the earliest possible regularly scheduled meeting  of the City Council. The City Council shall review the request and render a decision  affirming, affirming in part, conditionally affirming or reversing the determination of the  Urban Forester. If a Heritage Tree Removal Permit is issued after appeal, pursuant to the  provisions of this Code, the applicant must comply with all applicable provisions of this  Code, including mitigation.     D.  If the Urban Forester approves an application for a permit to remove a Protected or heritage  Heritage tree, then the applicant shall, no later than 30 days from the date of approval of the  application, submit a mitigation or payment of fees‐in‐lieu calculation and a mitigation plan,  pursuant to Section 8.05 showing the proposed species, location and irrigation plan for the  proposed mitigation trees.     E.  If the required mitigation plan is not submitted within 30 days of the application approval,  and the heritage subject tree has not been totally removed, the tree removal permit will be  declared inactive and tree removal shall not commence. If the tree removal has taken place  within that 30‐day period and the mitigation tree planting plan has not been submitted, then  no additional permits shall be issued for the project associated with the tree removal until  the planting plan is submitted.     Sec. 3.23.080. – Expiration.     A Heritage Tree Removal Permit shall remain valid for the longer of:     A.  The period of validity of the permit or authorization that required compliance with this  section; or     Page 48 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards  General Amendment No. 20‐03  ***DRAFT***  Added language is underlined Page 5 of 6 Chapter 3  Deleted language is strikethrough  B.  One hundred eighty days from the issuance of the tree removal permit.    SECTION 3.24. ‐ HERITAGE TREE PRUNING PERMIT     Sec. 3.24.010. ‐ Purpose.     The purpose of a Heritage Tree Pruning Permit is to determine whether such a tree should be  pruned and how the pruning shall be performed. Heritage trees shall not be pruned without first  securing approval from the City.    Sec. 3.24.020. – Applicability.     A.  The provisions of this section shall apply to all property located within the corporate limits  and in the extra territorial jurisdiction (ETJ) of the City.     B.  A Heritage Tree Pruning Permit shall be required for any pruning of a heritage tree located  on all properties, including single‐family and two‐family lots platted after February 13, 2007;  however, a tree pruning permit shall only be required during the original home construction.  Not withstanding the preceding exemption, if a future change of use from a single‐family or  two‐family home to any other use triggers a permit under this Code then the provisions of  the Heritage Pruning Permit will be required.    Sec. 3.24.030. – Review Process.     Review of a Heritage Tree Pruning Permit shall follow the administrative review procedures set  forth in Section 3.03.040, subject to the criteria for approval set forth below.     Sec. 3.24.040. ‐ Criteria for Approval.     No Heritage Tree Pruning Permit will be approved unless it is determined by the Urban Forester  or their designee, that the proposed pruning is justified based on the health or viability of the tree  and that the proposed pruning will not negatively impact the health and appearance of the tree.  In making this determination the following will be evaluated:     A.  Reason for pruning request;     B.  Tree location;     C.  Percent of canopy to be removed;     D.  Tree health; and     E.  Whether an ISA Certified Arborist is going to perform the pruning.  Page 49 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards  General Amendment No. 20‐03  ***DRAFT***  Added language is underlined Page 6 of 6 Chapter 3  Deleted language is strikethrough    Sec. 3.24.050. – Submission Requirements.     A.  Statement of justification for tree pruning.     B.  Copy of companion plat, Site Development Plan or concept plan for the permit or  authorization that required compliance with this section.     C.  A photo (digital or hardcopy) of the tree, labeled with the tree number on the tree survey,  DBH, species, and contractorʹs ISA certification number, shall be submitted with the  application for a Heritage Tree Pruning Permit.     Sec. 3.24.060. – Responsibility for Final Action.     A.  The Urban Forester is responsible for final action on Heritage Tree Pruning Permits.     B.  Upon receipt of the application, the Urban Forester shall inspect the subject tree and approve  or deny the application in accordance with the provisions of this section within ten working  days of the date of the application.     C.  An applicant may appeal the denial of a Heritage Tree Pruning Permit to the Director. Such  appeal must be made in writing and received by the Director within 30 days of the date of  the decision on the application by the Urban Forester. The request for appeal shall set forth  the specific reasons for the appeal and state the specific reasons for disagreement with the  decision of the Urban Forester, including the basis for the applicantʹs position that the  application should have been granted. The Director shall review the request and render a  decision affirming, affirming in part, conditionally affirming or reversing the determination  of the Urban Forester.    Sec. 3.24.070. – Expiration.     The Heritage Tree Pruning Permit shall remain valid for 180 days from date of issuance.    ***  ***  Page 50 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards General Amendment No. 20-03 ***DRAFT*** Added language is underlined Page 1 of 5 Chapter 4 Deleted language is strikethrough Chapter 4 - ZONING DISTRICTS *** SECTION 4.11. - GATEWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT This section establishes that certain roadways within the City limits shall be considered gateways into Georgetown and properties fronting such roadways shall be subject to special landscaping and design standards. This map is available for viewing at the office of the Planning and Development Department office or as a downloadable map at http://maps.georgetown.org. The map is simply a graphical depiction of each corridor; it does not infer boundaries or a hierarchy of roadways for determining the gateway classification. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of the Gateway Overlay districts (Gateways) is to protect and enhance the entrance corridors to the City and Downtown with landscaping, setbacks, and special design standards. The intent of the Gateways areis to establish entrance corridors that herald the approach to the City, define the arrival to a destination, and link common elements together. Sec. 4.11.010. - Applicability. All properties within The Gateway Overlay districts shall be designated on both side of the specific corridors listed in Section 4.11.0304.11.020, and shall extend up to a have a maximum width of 100 feet measured from the edge of the right-of-way. Properties within the Gateway Overlay districts shall follow the design standards in Section 4.11.040 4.11.030 and landscaping Page 51 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards General Amendment No. 20-03 ***DRAFT*** Added language is underlined Page 2 of 5 Chapter 4 Deleted language is strikethrough provisions set forth in Section 8.04.050 at the time of development. Gateway planting requirements may be credited toward the landscape requirements per in accordance with Chapter 8. Where the requirements of this section and the underlying zoning district conflict, the standards of this section shall apply. However, iIf another zoning overlay district exists on the property, the Gateway more stringent standards shall not apply. Sec. 4.11.020. - Gateway Corridors. The following corridors include roadways that are considered gateways into the community. Each Gateway category represents different roadways in town and may contain differing landscape buffer sizes and landscaping/design requirements. The relevant Gateway landscape buffer shall be shown on a plat and/or Site Development Plan as a landscape easement. The landscape buffer shall be considered to begin at the right-of-way line of each applicable roadway, regardless of the distance from the actual road. When Gateway corridors intersect or abut each other, the centerline of the roadway shall be used to determine the division of the corridor. A. Highway Gateways—25-Foot Landscape Buffer. The purpose of the Highway Gateway is to positively reflect the image of the City by enhancing development with well designed Site Plans and landscaping while maintaining a safe and effective interstate highway. Site design proposals along the highway gateways shall break up large masses of parking and pavement with well planned open space components. Additionally, careful analysis is required of view corridors from the highway. Strategically placed tree groupings should be located to frame desired views while screening parking areas. Highway Gateways include both the highway's main lanes and designated frontage roads. 1. Interstate Highway 35. 2. State Highway 195. 3. State Spur 158 (North Austin Avenue). 4. State Highway 130. B. Scenic/Natural Gateways—25-Foot Landscape Buffer. The purpose of the Scenic/Natural Gateway is to reflect the natural characteristics of the land. These Georgetown roadways are prominent arterials and growth zones leading into the City. The purpose of the design standards for the Scenic/Natural Gateway corridors is to maintain the existing informal character as they develop. For developments that occur along the Scenic/Natural Gateways, designers shall integrate the natural characteristics of the land into the landscape design. Informal tree massings, planting of under story trees, incorporation of native Page 52 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards General Amendment No. 20-03 ***DRAFT*** Added language is underlined Page 3 of 5 Chapter 4 Deleted language is strikethrough stones and boulders and use of native grasses and wildflowers are examples of how to blend required plantings with native plantings. 1. F.M. 2243 (Leander Road). 2. State Highway 29 (University Avenue), west of the intersection of I.H. 35 and east of the intersection of Southwestern Boulevard. 3. State Spur 26 (South Austin Avenue). 4. F.M. 2338 (Williams Drive). 5. F.M. 971. 6. F.M. 1460. C. Downtown Gateways—Ten-Foot Landscape Buffer. The purpose of the Downtown Gateway standards is to enhance and unify the appearance of the major roadways adjacent to, and directly leading into downtown Georgetown. Because of the close proximity to the Downtown District, the appearance of the Downtown Gateway shall reflect a relatively formal, urban extension of the downtown and visually enhance its aesthetic appearance. In order to establish the formal appearance, trees shall be evenly spaced and located equal distance behind the property line. Although the intent for the Downtown Gateway corridors is to establish a consistent, formal landscape appearance, the design standards are not intended to adversely affect existing trees along the roadways. Variations to these standards are allowed to provide for the preservation of existing trees. All non-residential properties in Downtown Gateways are subject to special setback design requirements, denoted in Subsection 4.11.040030.B. 1. South Austin Avenue, beginning north of the intersection of F.M. 1460/F.M. 2243 (Leander Road) and ending at the southern boundary of the Downtown Overlay District. 2. North Austin Avenue, beginning at the northern boundary of the Downtown Overlay District and ending at the intersection of F.M. 2338 (Williams Drive). 3. State Highway 29 (University Avenue), beginning at the western boundary of the Downtown Overlay District and ending at the intersection of I.H. 35. 4. State Highway 29 (University Avenue), beginning at the eastern boundary of the Downtown Overlay District and ending at the intersection of Southwestern Boulevard. Page 53 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards General Amendment No. 20-03 ***DRAFT*** Added language is underlined Page 4 of 5 Chapter 4 Deleted language is strikethrough Sec. 4.11.030. – Gateway Design Standards. A. Landscaping Standards. Calculation of required landscaping must comply with Section 8.078.04.050, Gateway Overlay District landscape. Where regulations and requirements for Gateways and the underlying another zoning district conflict, the more restrictive regulations shall apply. B. Special Setbacks in the Downtown Gateway. 1. For all non-residential properties in the Downtown Gateway, regardless of zoning district, the front setback is zero. For purposes of this setback, the property line will be replaced with the edge of the gateway landscape buffer. 2. Parking is prohibited between the front building line and edge of the Gateway landscape buffer. 3. The front building line shall comprise of a minimum of 40 forty percent (40%) of the primary facade of the primary building. 4. Features allowed between the front building line and the landscape buffer shall be limited to those allowed in Subsection 7.03.030.A.4.a.v.i7.02.030.C.4. 5. Fencing shall meet the requirements in Section 8.07.030. C. Sidewalks. Sidewalks shall be required in accordance with Table 12.03.020. All sidewalks shall be constructed and designed to coordinate the location of any new sidewalks and to tie into existing sidewalks. If the sidewalk lies within the Gateway landscape buffer, some portion of the site's required landscaping shall be located between the sidewalk and the designated right-of-way. Properties in the Downtown Gateway require construction of a minimum six-foot sidewalk. Scenic and Highway Gateways require sidewalks, where applicable, in accordance with Section 12.02. D. Parking. No parking will be allowed within a Gateway landscape buffer and all screening of adjacent parking will be in accordance with Section 8.04.070. E. Site Limitations. Page 54 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards General Amendment No. 20-03 ***DRAFT*** Added language is underlined Page 5 of 5 Chapter 4 Deleted language is strikethrough 1. Drainage facilities are not allowed within a Gateway landscape buffer except those that are necessary to convey drainage in the shortest possible route to or from the street right-of-way, if determined to be required by the Development Engineer. If determined to be necessary in such instances, the drainage facilities shall follow the design requirements in Section 11.0504. Drainage facilities include all detention ponds, water quality ponds, outlet structures, drainage berms, improved channels or other improvements associated with the drainage improvements. 2. Dumpsters and mechanical equipment are not allowed in the front, side, or rear setback if the setback is directly adjacent to a Gateway roadway. 3. All utilities installed for the development shall be located underground. The developer shall not have to retrofit existing utilities. 4. No service areas or service drives shall be permitted to front a Gateway roadway. F. Boundary Walls. Residential boundary walls may be required, as described in Section 8.07.060. *** *** Page 55 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards  General Amendment No. 20‐03  ***DRAFT***  Added language is underlined Page 1 of 38 Chapter 8  Deleted language is strikethrough  Chapter 8 ‐ TREE PRESERVATION, LANDSCAPING AND FENCING     SECTION 8.01. ‐ GENERAL     Sec. 8.01.010. ‐ Purpose.     This chapter establishes requirements for the preservation and protection of native trees and the  provision of landscaping, buffering, and screening to provide for the orderly, attractive, and  healthful development of land and promote the health, safety, and general welfare of the  community.     A.  The regulations contained herein are necessary to protect the character and enhance the  ecological, environmental, and aesthetic qualities of the community.     B.  The use of landscape elements can contribute to air purification, oxygen regeneration,  water absorption, water purification, and noise, glare, and heat abatement indicating  that the use of landscape elements is of benefit to the health, welfare, and general well  being of the community and, therefore, it is proper that the use of such elements be  required.     C.  The City experiences frequent droughts; therefore, it is a purpose of this chapter to  encourage the use of low‐water, drought‐tolerant plants and trees and the grouping of  vegetation by water requirements.     D.  The City values its indigenous and historic natural features; therefore, the placement of  proposed buildings and improvements should be oriented in a manner that allows for  the preservation of existing trees and native landscape. In addition, natural areas to be  preserved should be integrated within the design of open space, screening, and  landscaped areas.    Sec. 8.01.020. – Authority.     A.  The provisions of this chapter are adopted pursuant to Texas Local Government Code chs.  211 and 212 and the City Charter.     B.  The provisions of this chapter are administered by the Director of Planning and the Urban  Forester under the direction of the Director. Unless otherwise indicated within this chapter,  appeals of the Urban Foresterʹs decisions shall be made to the Director. For this chapter,  appeals of the Directorʹs decisions shall be made to the City Council utilizing the procedures  set forth in Section 3.14, Appeal of an administrative decision.         Page 56 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards  General Amendment No. 20‐03  ***DRAFT***  Added language is underlined Page 2 of 38 Chapter 8  Deleted language is strikethrough  Sec. 8.01.030. ‐ Applicability.     This chapter applies to all properties located within the corporate limits and the extra‐territorial  jurisdiction (ETJ) of the City; however, each section applies differently depending on the specific  use and location. Further clarification of the applicability of individual sections of this chapter  can be found described within each section. The sections listed below correspond to Table 8.01.030  and are applicable to each type of use as identified in the table.     • Subsection 8.02.030.D. Heritage Trees     • Subsection 8.02.030.E. Protected Trees     • Section 8.03. Residential landscaping     • Section 8.04. Non‐residential landscaping     • Section 8.05. Review and approval process     • Section 8.06. Plant selection, installation, and maintenance     • Section 8.07. Fencing     The following table summarizes the provisions of this chapter applicable to each type of use,  within both the ETJ and the City limits.     Table 8.01.030: Provisions Applicable by Use and Location    Location Type of Use  Sec  8.02.030.D  Sec  8.02.030.E  Sec  8.03  Sec  8.04  Sec  8.05  Sec  8.06  Sec  8.07  City  Limits   Single‐family and Two‐family X — X — X X X  All other uses  X X — X X X X  ETJ   Single‐family and Two‐family X — — — X X —  All other uses  X X — — X X —     X = required     Sec. 8.01.040. – Essential Terms Defined.     A.  For the purposes of this chapter, the term ʺresidentialʺ shall include Single‐family and Two‐ family development and ʺnon‐residentialʺ shall include all other uses, including Townhouse  and Multi‐family.     Page 57 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards  General Amendment No. 20‐03  ***DRAFT***  Added language is underlined Page 3 of 38 Chapter 8  Deleted language is strikethrough  B.  For the purposes of this chapter, the term ʺexempt propertiesʺ shall mean all Single‐family  and Two‐family lots platted prior to February 13, 2007.     C.  Diameter Breast Height (DBH) is the diameter of a tree measured at four and one‐half feet  above ground, as further defined in Chapter 16. The DBH of a tree with more than one trunk  shall be calculated as the sum of the DBH of the largest trunk and one half the sum of the  remaining trunks. Trees classified as Ornamental Trees by the Preferred, Controlled, and  Prohibited Plant List adopted through the Development Manual with more than one trunk  shall be calculated as the sum of the DBH of the largest trunk of the tree and one half the  DBH of the largest trunk of the tree multiplied by the number of remaining trunks.    D.  Critical Root Zone (CRZ) is a circular region measured outward from the tree trunk  representing the essential root area that must be protected for the treeʹs survival and is  calculated as one foot of radial distance for every one inch of DBH.     E.  The definitions in Chapter 16 of this Code shall apply to these and other terms within this  chapter.     Sec. 8.01.050. ‐ Unified Development Code Development Manual.     The Unified Development Code Development Manual is a companion document to this Code,  containing templates for Tree Surveys, Tree Preservation Plans, landscape and tree calculations,  and other relevant information for completing a Site Plan or other required process. The  Development Manual also contains the City plant lists, including the preferred, prohibited, and  controlled plant lists, and the landscape and tree technical standards (Technical Standards) which  provides technical guidance for the selection, planting. and maintenance of plants required by  this Code.     Sec. 8.01.060. ‐ Additional Resources.     The City encourages use of additional resources and publications that compliment this chapter  and its companion manuals, to provide further details on plant selection, maintenance, and other  relevant information. Recommended examples include the Austin Grow Green Guide, Lady Bird  Johnson Wildflower Center Invasive Plant List, Williamson County Native Plant Society  publications, and publications from local and regional water providers and conservation groups.     SECTION 8.02. – TREE PRESERVATION AND PROTECTION     The purpose of this section is to provide for the preservation, protection, removal, and mitigation  of Protected Trees and Heritage Trees. The provisions of this section shall be implemented by the  Urban Forester, under the direction of the Director.       Page 58 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards  General Amendment No. 20‐03  ***DRAFT***  Added language is underlined Page 4 of 38 Chapter 8  Deleted language is strikethrough  Sec. 8.02.010. ‐ Applicability.     A.  The provisions of this Section 8.02 shall apply to all non‐exempt property located within the  corporate limits and extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) of the City.     B.  Notwithstanding the provisions contained herein to the contrary, the provisions of this  Section 8.02 shall not apply to exempt property unless the use of the property shall change  from a residential classification to a non‐residential classification.     C.  The Protected Tree provisions of this section apply only to non‐residential development as  defined in Section 8.01.040 above.     Sec. 8.02.020. – Tree Classifications Established.     A.  Protected Tree.     A Protected Tree is any tree, excluding Hackberry, Chinaberry, Ashe Juniper (cedar),  Mountain Cedar, Blueberry Juniper, Post Cedar, Chinese Tallow, and Mesquite, that has a  diameter at breast height (DBH) of 12 inches or larger, excluding Heritage Trees.     B.  Heritage Tree.     1.  The Heritage Tree classification applies to any of the following tree species that has a  DBH of 26 inches or larger: Live Oak, Post Oak, Shumard Oak, Bur Oak, Chinquapin  Oak, Monterey Oak, Bald Cypress, American Elm, Cedar Elm, Pecan, Walnut, Texas  Ash, or Southern Magnolia.     2.  The Heritage Tree classification may also be designated by resolution of the City Council  to any tree of historical value or significant community benefit.     Sec. 8.02.030. – Preservation of Protected and Heritage Trees.     A.  Unless otherwise allowed by this chapter, no property shall be clear‐cut or selectively  cleared, nor shall a Protected Tree or Heritage Tree be removed, without first securing the  necessary approval from the City.     B.  Exceptions.     1.  Residential Exemption.     Existing residential subdivisions approved and platted prior to February 13, 2007, are  exempt from the regulations in this section.     Page 59 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards  General Amendment No. 20‐03  ***DRAFT***  Added language is underlined Page 5 of 38 Chapter 8  Deleted language is strikethrough  2.  Hazardous Trees.     a.  Natural Disasters and Other Emergencies. If a Protected Tree or Heritage Tree is  determined to be causing a danger or to be in a hazardous condition due to a natural  disaster such as a tornado, fire, storm, flood, or other act of God that endangers  public health, welfare, or safety, the requirements of this section may be waived as  deemed necessary by the Emergency Management Coordinator or their designee,  and the Assistant City Manager, after consultation with the Urban Forester, with  such consultation and determination to occur within one calendar day of an  applicantʹs request to remove or prune said tree.     b.  Airport Clear Zone. Protected and Heritage Trees located in the Airport Clear Zone  are exempt from the requirements of this section.     c.  Sight Triangles. If the Urban Forester and Development Engineer determine a  protected or Heritage Tree is interfering with the safe visibility at a sight triangle of  an existing public street, the tree may be removed without fulfilling the mitigation  requirements of this chapter.     d.  Dead or Diseased Trees. If the Urban Forester determines, based on a site  inspection, that a Protected or Heritage Tree is already dead, dying or fatally  diseased prior to starting a project, the provisions of the mitigation requirements  will not apply and such determination shall be provided in writing.     3.  Public Utilities.   Pruning the canopy of Protected Trees and Heritage Trees may be carried out by public  utility providers in the Cityʹs right‐of‐way or public utility easement without prior  approval by the Urban Forester, if performed by or under the supervision of an  International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Arborist. Removal of a Protected  or Heritage Tree removal requested by any utility providers in the Cityʹs right‐of‐way  or public utility easement must be submitted to the Urban Forester for review and  approval or through a right‐of‐way permit in accordance with Chapter 12.08 of the City  Code of Ordinances.     C.  Protection of Critical Root Zone.     1.  No construction or disturbance shall occur within an area that constitutes more than 50  percent (50%) of the total CRZ and one‐half the radial distance of the CRZ for each tree  being preserved, including Protected Trees, Heritage Trees, and any other trees for  which credit for preservation is to be assigned per this chapter. This defined area shall  be flagged and encircled with protective fencing during construction. The Urban  Forester may approve construction closer to the trunk than one‐half the radial distance,  depending on the size, spacing, or species of the tree, the type of disturbance proposed,  Page 60 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards  General Amendment No. 20‐03  ***DRAFT***  Added language is underlined Page 6 of 38 Chapter 8  Deleted language is strikethrough  and uniqueness of the situation, if acceptable supplemental nutrients and/or soil  aeration are provided and the probable survival rate of the tree is high.     2.  Cut or fill that is greater than four inches in depth and the severing of major roots shall  be considered disturbance for the purposes of this chapter.     3.  Within the protected CRZ, only flatwork, decking, or similar construction, may be  approved and shall not affect the branching of the tree.     4.  If proposed or actual protection of the CRZ of a tree does not meet the requirements of  this section, then the tree shall be considered removed and shall require mitigation in  accordance with Section 8.02.040.     D.  Heritage Tree Preservation Requirements.     1.  The requirements of this chapter as they relate to Heritage Trees shall be applicable to  all development within the Cityʹs jurisdiction including both residential and non‐ residential development, unless otherwise exempted by Section 8.02.030.     2.  Heritage Trees shall be preserved on site unless otherwise approved for removal or  relocation as outlined in Section 8.02.040.     3.  Heritage Trees shall be graphically identified on Subdivision Plats, and the plat shall  contain a note stating that such trees cannot be removed without prior consent from the  City.     4.  Each plat shall contain certification, with a plat note, that all individual lots containing  Heritage Trees are configured and designed so that the lot is developable for the  intended purpose without requiring removal of the Heritage Tree or exceeding the  percentage of allowable disturbance within the Heritage Tree CRZ.     5.  It shall be unlawful to prune a Heritage Tree without an approved Heritage Tree pruning  permit per Section 3.23 of this Code. All approved pruning must be performed by an  International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Arborist or under the supervision  of an ISA Certified Arborist, and must follow the American National Standards Institute  (ANSI) A300 standards. Heritage Tree pruning permits do not apply to lots containing  constructed single‐family and two‐family dwellings.     6.  Heritage Trees shall not be removed or damaged in rights‐of‐way or easements, unless  specifically approved by the Urban Forester.     7.  Preserved Heritage Trees may also be credited towards the landscape requirements of  Sections 8.03 and 8.04.   Page 61 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards  General Amendment No. 20‐03  ***DRAFT***  Added language is underlined Page 7 of 38 Chapter 8  Deleted language is strikethrough    E.  Protected Tree Preservation Requirements.     1.  The requirements of this chapter as they relate to Protected Trees shall be applicable to  all non‐residential development within the Cityʹs jurisdiction. Single‐ and two‐family  development is exempt from the Protected Tree requirements.     2.  Required Protected Tree Preservation Percentages.     a.  The minimum number of Protected Trees required to be preserved on site shall be  based on the average density of all Protected Trees on the site. For multi‐site unified  developments, the tree preservation percentages may be averaged over the entire  development provided it is identified as such on the Subdivision Plat or Site Plan  for the development. Densities shall be determined based on the Tree Survey.  Mitigation shall be required for trees approved for removal, using the calculations  detailed in Subsection 8.02.040.C.     Table 8.02.030: Required Protected Tree Preservation    Average Tree Density  Minimum Percentage of Protected Trees  Required to be Preserved   1—10 trees per acre  30%   11+ trees per acre  20%      b.  An applicant may request an Administrative Exception to these percentages, per  Section 3.16 of this Code, based on the tree species and location, site features,  topographical limitations, existing buildings, and other site limitations or  constraints preserve less than the minimum percentages of Protected Trees outlined  in Table 8.02.030 provided that the inches of trees removed beyond the minimum  required to be preserved be mitigated at a rate of 1.5 times the calculations required  in Section 8.04.020.     3.  Preserved Protected Trees may also be credited towards the landscape requirements of  Sections 8.03 and 8.04.     F.  Tree Preservation and Mitigation Boundaries.     1.  All Protected and Heritage Trees on a property shall be considered existing trees for the  purpose of determining the number of Protected Trees required to be preserved in  Section 8.02.030.E. 1. No trees shall be considered existing trees or credit trees if located  in an area of required right‐of‐way dedication per Sections 12.02 and 12.03 of this Code  Page 62 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards  General Amendment No. 20‐03  ***DRAFT***  Added language is underlined Page 8 of 38 Chapter 8  Deleted language is strikethrough  where no public improvements are required to be constructed as a part of the scope of  work.     2.  Removal of Protected and Heritage Trees within an area of required right‐of‐way  dedication shall be mitigated in accordance with this Code.     Sec. 8.02.040. – Removal of a Protected or Heritage Tree.     A.  Transplanting of a Protected or Heritage Tree.     Protected and Heritage Trees may be transplanted to a suitable location either on the same  property or off‐site, as approved by the Urban Forester. To qualify, a tree transplanting  company from the Cityʹs approved vendor list or one otherwise approved in writing by the  Urban Forester, must be used and fiscal surety must be filed with the City to guarantee a  two‐year monitoring and maintenance program for the transplanted trees. The property  owner/manager shall submit quarterly statements that demonstrate compliance with the  required tree monitoring and maintenance provided by an approved tree care service. If  compliance is not demonstrated, the surety will be used by the City provide the required  monitoring and maintenance. Monitoring shall include soil moisture analysis, fertilization,  pest and disease management, soil amendments, and any other service deemed necessary by  the Urban Forester or the tree care service. This surety shall remain in place until the end of  the two‐year period.     B.  Heritage Tree Removal Permit.     Heritage Trees may be removed only with the approval of a Heritage Tree removal permit,  per Section 3.23 of this Code, and after the required mitigation has been provided. Prior to  the approval of a Heritage Tree removal permit, all other efforts to preserve the tree in its  natural location should be attempted, including those listed under tree preservation  priorities in Section 8.02.050. Removal of a Protected Tree does not require a permit, but shall  meet the required mitigation calculation as defined below.     C.  Mitigation for Removal of a Protected or Heritage Tree.     The removal of Protected and Heritage Trees shall require mitigation using the calculations  and procedures defined below. The tree mitigation inch‐to‐inch ratio applies to the DBH of  the trees to be removed. Mitigation may be achieved through credit of existing trees on site,  replacement trees planted either on or off‐site, payment‐in‐lieu of replacement trees,  supplemental nutrition and aeration, or a combination thereof. The Urban Forester shall have  the final decision on the selected mitigation option. In consultation with the Urban Forester,  all options to consider the on‐site replacement of trees shall be exhausted before other  methods of mitigation shall be considered. Each method of mitigation is described within  this section.   Page 63 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards  General Amendment No. 20‐03  ***DRAFT***  Added language is underlined Page 9 of 38 Chapter 8  Deleted language is strikethrough    1.  Mitigation Ratios.     a.  Mitigation shall be provided at a 1:1 inch basis for 40 percent (40%) of the total  diameter inches of Protected Trees removed, measured at DBH.     b.  Mitigation shall be provided at a 3:1 inch basis for the total diameter inches of  Heritage Trees removed, measured at DBH.     c.  Mitigation shall be provided at a 2:1 inch basis for the total diameter inches of any  Protected Tree with a DBH of 26 inches or greater that is not a Heritage Tree species,  as defined in Subsection 8.02.020.B.     d.  Exceptions.     i.  No mitigation shall be required for the following tree species: Hackberry,  Chinaberry, Ashe Juniper (cedar), Mountain Cedar, Blueberry Juniper, Post  Cedar, Chinese Tallow, and Mesquite.     ii.  No mitigation shall be required for Protected and Heritage Trees that are  approved for removal due to poor health.     2.  Mitigation by On‐Site Credit Trees.     a.  Existing trees with a DBH of at least six inches and no more than 11 inches that  remain on a site are considered credit trees and may be credited toward the required  mitigation trees under this section, subject to approval by the Urban Forester based  on the assessed health, structure, growth habit, presence of disease or decline, and  the available growing space of the tree. Hackberry, Chinaberry, Ashe Juniper  (Cedar), Mountain Cedar, Blueberry Juniper, Post Cedar, Chinese Tallow, and  Mesquite Trees shall not be considered credit trees.     i. Trees classified as Ornamental Trees by the Preferred, Controlled, and  Prohibited Plant List adopted through the Development Manual may be  considered on‐site credit trees and used as credit toward mitigation  requirements. The amount of inches that may be credited for each ornamental  tree shall be equal to the sum of the DBH of the largest trunk of the tree and  one half the DBH of the largest trunk of the tree multiplied by the number of  remaining trunks.    ii. Trees located within the FEMA one percent (1%) floodplain or the calculated  1% floodplain may not be considered on‐site credit trees for the purposes of  mitigation. Credit Trees located outside of the FEMA one percent (1%)  Page 64 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards  General Amendment No. 20‐03  ***DRAFT***  Added language is underlined Page 10 of 38 Chapter 8  Deleted language is strikethrough  floodplain or the calculated one percent (1%) floodplain may be credited at a  ratio of 2:1 per DBH inch preserved.    b.  When mitigation is to be met by on‐site credit trees, the total inches shall be based  on the mitigation calculation as listed in Subsection C.1. above.     c.  Credit trees may apply towards a maximum of 75 percent (75%) of the required  mitigation inches for Protected Trees.     d.  Credit trees shall not be used towards mitigation for Heritage Trees.     e.  Credit trees shall be indicated on a Tree Survey, the tree schedule, and the  Mitigation Plan.     3.  Mitigation by On‐Site Replacement Trees.     a.  When mitigation is to be met by the planting of on‐site trees, the total inches planted  shall be based on the mitigation calculation as listed in Subsection C.1. of this  section.     b.  All mitigation trees shall be from the preferred plant list and generally reach the  same size at maturity as the tree(s) removed.     c.  Trees planted for mitigation may be used as credit towards the landscaping  requirements of Section 8.04.     4.  Mitigation by Payment or Off‐Site Tree Replacement.     When it is determined by the Urban Forester that mitigation for protected or Heritage  Tree removal by the planting of trees on site is not feasible or desirable, e.g. planting  capacity has been reached on site, an applicant may request to use one of the following  alternatives or combination thereof in lieu of replanting on site, with the approval of the  Urban Forester.     a.  Planting the required number of mitigation trees that would otherwise be required  on‐site in a City‐owned park or property or other publicly‐owned property (e.g.,  Georgetown ISD or Williamson County property) within the City or ETJ in the  locations approved by the Urban Forester; or     b.  Payment of $200.00 $225.00 per DBH inches of Heritage Tree removed, $175.00 per  DBH inches of Protected Tree with a DBH of 18 inches or greater removed, or  $150.00$125.00 per DBH inches of Protected Tree with a DBH equal to or greater  than 12 inches but less than 18 inches removed, into a fund or account to be used by  Page 65 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards  General Amendment No. 20‐03  ***DRAFT***  Added language is underlined Page 11 of 38 Chapter 8  Deleted language is strikethrough  the City for planting, pruning, irrigation, maintenance, and other associated tree  activities in a City Park or other City‐owned property. The payment(s) shall be made  prior to final approval of the project.     c.  At the discretion of the Urban Forester, a reimbursement of mitigation payment may  be issued due to deviations from the approved Tree Mitigation Plan during  construction of a project. At the discretion of the Urban Forester, and in special  circumstances, a reimbursement of mitigation fees paid may be requested for the  preservation of any tree identified on the Tree Preservation Plan as ʺremovedʺ at  time of final inspection.      5.  Mitigation by Soil Aeration and Supplemental Nutrients.     An applicant may spend up to 30 percent (30%) of the total cost of required mitigation  (based on fee‐in‐lieu calculation) for soil aeration and/or supplemental nutrients for on‐ site trees within the limits of construction, per the Technical Standards. To qualify for  this mitigation option, the owner or general contractor shall select a fertilization  contractor from the Cityʹs approved vendor list or one otherwise approved in writing by  the Urban Forester, and ensure coordination with the Cityʹs Urban Forester. The  materials and methods for the soil aeration or supplemental nutrition mitigation shall  be approved by the Urban Forester prior to final application approval. Soil aeration  treatment shall commence after the completion of all site construction and prior to any  landscape installation. Before the Certificate Of Occupancy may be granted, the property  owner shall file fiscal surety with the City to guarantee implementation of the stipulated  supplemental nutrition program. All treated areas shall be mulched and remain un‐ compacted.     D.  Unauthorized Removal of a Protected or Heritage Tree.     Any person who removes a Protected or Heritage Tree in violation of this chapter,  accidentally or otherwise, shall be required to comply with the mitigation provisions of this  section, and, if the act is intentional, to pay a fine for each tree that is removed, as allowed by  law, in addition to any penalties pursuant to Chapter 15. Mitigation for projects without  active permits shall be based on the mitigation provisions applicable at the time of the  violation, not those at the time of platting or other approval.     Sec. 8.02.050. – Tree Preservation Incentives and Priorities.     A.  Tree Preservation Incentives.     1.  Impervious Cover Increase.     Page 66 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards  General Amendment No. 20‐03  ***DRAFT***  Added language is underlined Page 12 of 38 Chapter 8  Deleted language is strikethrough  The Director may increase the amount of permitted impervious cover up to five percent  (5%) for the preservation of Protected Trees beyond the amount required by Subsection  8.02.030.E. A one‐percent (1%) increase in impervious cover may be granted for each one  percent (1%) of Protected Trees preserved beyond the minimum required per Table  8.02.030. For example, a site required to preserve a minimum of 30 percent (30%) of total  Protected Trees may receive a three‐percent (3%) impervious cover bonus by preserving  33 percent (33%) of the Protected Trees on a site. The maximum impervious cover shall  not exceed that specified in Section 11.02.010.     2.  Parkland Dedication Credit.     The Parkland dedication requirement may be reduced if a Heritage Tree is saved within  the dedicated Parkland lot in accordance with Section 13.08 of this Code, subject to  approval by the Parks and Recreation Director.     3.  Parking Space Reduction.     The Director may approve a reduction in the number of parking spaces required by ten  percent (10%) for the preservation of a Protected Tree with a DBH of 20 inches or greater.  A maximum of a 30 percent (30%) total reduction may be granted under this provision.  This reduction is not applicable in the Downtown Overlay District.     B.  Tree Preservation Priorities.     1.  Heritage Trees.     The City values its Heritage Trees and, therefore, Heritage Tree protection may be  considered for priority over conflicting UDC development requirements, including, but  not limited to, setbacks, lot design standards, building heights, sidewalks, lighting,  signage, parking design and numbers, drainage criteria, connectivity, driveway  separation, and utility extension and location. If there is a conflict between Heritage Tree  protection and other provisions of this Code, the applicant may request an alternative  standard or design, provided that public health and safety shall be maintained with all  proposed designs. After consultation with the Urban Forester, an alternative standard  or design that gives priority to Heritage Tree protection may be approved by the Director  for administrative applications or the Planning and Zoning Commission for applications  under their approval authority through an application for an Administrative Exception  under the provisions of UDC Section 3.16. Appeal of a Heritage Tree protection priority  decision by any of the approval authorities may be taken to the City Council. This appeal  is required within 30 days of the approval authorityʹs action.     2.  Protected Trees.     Page 67 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards  General Amendment No. 20‐03  ***DRAFT***  Added language is underlined Page 13 of 38 Chapter 8  Deleted language is strikethrough  The preservation of Protected Trees with a DBH of 18 inches or greater or a stand of  Protected Trees with a cumulative DBH of 18 inches or greater may take priority over  the design and construction of public sidewalks, including the proposal of alternative  locations, widths and materials, under the approval authority of the Director. The  applicant may request an alternative standard or design, provided that minimum public  health and safety standards are maintained, including ADA requirements conflicting  UDC development requirements, including, but not limited to, setbacks, lot design  standards, building heights, sidewalks, lighting, signage, parking design and numbers,  drainage criteria, connectivity, driveway separation, and utility extension and location.  If there is a conflict between Protected Tree protection and other provisions of this Code,  the applicant may request an alternative standard or design, provided that public health  and safety shall be maintained with all proposed designs. After consultation with the  Urban Forester, an alternative standard or design that gives priority to Protected Tree  protection may be approved by the Director through an application for an  Administrative Exception under the provisions of UDC Section 3.16.     SECTION 8.03. ‐ RESIDENTIAL LANDSCAPING     Sec. 8.03.010. – Applicability.     The provisions of this section shall be considered minimum standards and shall apply to  residential properties within the City limits, as defined in Section 8.01.040 of this chapter. Also  refer to Section 8.05 for the residential review process and Section 8.06 for plant selection,  installation, and maintenance requirements.     Sec. 8.03.020. – Shade Tree Requirement.     A.  At time of home construction, all new single or two‐family homebuilders shall provide  shade trees from the preferred plant list within each street yard at a ratio of one tree per each  50 feet of street frontage or portion thereof, exclusive of driveway.     B.  Existing trees preserved within the street yard may count toward the shade tree requirement  using the ratios provided for in Subsection 8.04.020.B. If existing trees are to remain, the tree  protection measures of Subsection 8.02.030.C shall be followed.     Sec. 8.03.030. – Residential Lawns.     Any lawn or turf areas on a residential property shall be fully sodded or seeded in a warm  weather grass variety in conformance with Subsection 8.06.020.C. Synthetic or artificial turf is not  allowed.     Sec. 8.03.040. ‐ Residential Parking Areas.     Page 68 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards  General Amendment No. 20‐03  ***DRAFT***  Added language is underlined Page 14 of 38 Chapter 8  Deleted language is strikethrough  Pursuant to Subsection 6.05.020.C.8., some parking areas located in the required residential front  yard may require screening from the street view.     SECTION 8.04. ‐ NON‐RESIDENTIAL LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS     Sec. 8.04.010. ‐ Applicability.     The provisions of this section shall be considered minimum standards and shall apply to the  development of all non‐residential properties within the City limits, as defined in Section 8.01.040  of this chapter, regardless of zoning district, with the exception of the construction of accessory  structures necessary for or directly related to the ownership or raising of livestock for agricultural  purposes, including, but not limited to, barns, shelters, sheds or other structures. Additional  plantings in excess of the minimum requirements are encouraged. Also refer to Section 8.05 for  the review and appeal process and Section 8.06 for plant selection, installation, and maintenance  requirements.     Sec. 8.04.020. – Landscape Tree Credits.     A.  A tree credited towards a landscape requirement must meet the locational requirements of  the provision for which credit is awarded (i.e. within the specified bufferyard) and, unless  otherwise noted, may not be credited towards more than one landscape requirement.     B.  In order to maximize the preservation of existing trees, surveyed trees in good health that  have a DBH of at least six inches and are listed in the City preferred plant list may provide  credit towards the landscaping requirements of the following sections. Each existing tree  preserved may provide landscape tree credits as indicated in the following table.     Table 8.04.020.B: Landscape Credits for Existing Trees    DBH in Inches  Credit   6 to 19  1 tree   20 or greater  2 trees      C.  Additionally, trees planted to meet the mitigation requirements of Subsection 8.02.040.C  may provide credit towards the landscaping requirements of the following sections.     D.  Credit shall not be awarded unless protection of the CRZ of the credited tree is carried out  as required for protected and Heritage Trees in Section 8.02.030. Credit may be withheld,  during review or inspection of the project, based on the assessed health, structure, growth  habit, presence of disease or decline, and the available growing space of the tree.     Sec. 8.04.030. – Street Yard Landscaping.   Page 69 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards  General Amendment No. 20‐03  ***DRAFT***  Added language is underlined Page 15 of 38 Chapter 8  Deleted language is strikethrough    Each non‐residential property shall provide pervious landscaped area and plantings within the  street yard. These requirements are based on the size of the street yard as indicated below.  Plantings provided to meet required parking lot and Gateway Overlay District landscaping  requirements may be used to meet this provision, provided they are located within the street  yard.     A.  Street yards less than 50,000 10,000 square feet shall provide:     1.  Landscape area totaling 20 percent (20%) of the street yard; and     2.  One (1) shade tree and three (3) shrubs per 5,000 2,500 square feet of street yard.     B.  Street yards between 50,00010,000 and 500,000100,000 square feet shall provide:     1.  Landscape area totaling 20 percent (20%) of the street yard; and     2.  Ten Four (4) shade trees and 30 twelve (12) shrubs per the first 50,000 10,000 square  feet of street yard, plus one and half (1.5) shade trees and three four (4) shrubs per  every additional 10,000 square feet of street yard thereafter.     C.  Street yards larger than 500,000 100,000 square feet shall provide:     1.  Landscape area totaling 20 percent (20%) of the street yard; and     2.  Fifty‐fiveEighteen (18) shade trees and 175forty‐eight (48) shrubs per the first  500,000 100,000 square feet of street yard, plus one two (2) shade trees and three five  (5) shrubs per every additional 25,000  20,000 square feet of street yard thereafter.     D.  Plantings within a required street yard may be planted in zones to distribute the  plantings throughout the street yard and focus the largest percentage of plantings along  the right(s)‐of‐way.    1.  When this option is used, required street yard plantings shall be distributed as  follows:    a.  Low Level Zone. Ten percent (10%) of the required plantings shall be planted  within twenty‐eight (28) feet of the building façade.     b.  Mid Level Zone. Thirty percent (30%) of the required plantings shall be planted  within the Low Level and High Level zones.    Page 70 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards  General Amendment No. 20‐03  ***DRAFT***  Added language is underlined Page 16 of 38 Chapter 8  Deleted language is strikethrough  c.  High Level Zone. Sixty percent (60%) of the required plantings shall be planted  between the right‐of‐way and Mid Level zone.     2. The distribution of plantings within a required street yard shall be required for all  phased development. All plantings required at ultimate buildout in the High Level  Zone shall be installed as a part of phase 1.     Sec. 8.04.040. – Parking Lot Landscaping.     All non‐residential surface parking areas or lots shall contain areas constructed, planted, and  maintained as landscaped islands, peninsulas, or medians and shall contain shade trees to reduce  the thermal impact of parking lots. Enclosed parking structures and vehicle display and sales  areas are exempt from the parking lot landscaping requirements set forth herein. Landscaping  provided to meet this section shall consist of landscaped areas and shade trees as outlined below  and may also be credited towards the street yard landscaping requirements, if they are located  within the street yard.     A.  Landscape Area.     1.  Twenty square feet of pervious landscape area shall be provided within the parking  lot for each parking stall located between the building line and the street right‐of‐ way.     2.  Ten square feet of pervious landscape area shall be provided within the parking lot  for each parking stall not located between the building line and the street right‐of‐ way.     B.  Shade Trees.     1.  A minimum of one shade tree is required per every 12 parking stalls provided.     2.  Each parking stall in excess of the required shall be calculated as one and one‐half  stalls for purposes of required shade trees.     3.  In order to maximize the distribution of shade, shade trees shall be planted  throughout the interior of the parking lot so that no parking stall is located further  than 50 feet from the trunk of a tree unless otherwise approved by the Director.     4.  Planting areas for each tree shall have a minimum undisturbed pervious area of at  least 100 square feet and have a minimum interior dimension of eight feet wide,  exclusive of the curb dimensions, and shall be planted or covered with grass, mulch,  ground cover, or other approved landscape materials. These areas shall be non‐ compacted or excavated and filled with quality soil in accordance with the Technical  Page 71 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards  General Amendment No. 20‐03  ***DRAFT***  Added language is underlined Page 17 of 38 Chapter 8  Deleted language is strikethrough  Standards. These areas shall also be free of other structures such as lighting or utility  poles.     C.  Exemptions.    Enclosed parking structures and vehicle display and sales areas, as defined in this Code,  are exempt from the parking lot landscaping requirements.    Sec. 8.04.050. – Gateway Overlay District Landscaping.     The landscaping requirements in this section are associated with the Gateway Overlay Districts  established and detailed in Section 4.094.11. The following standards are required for all non‐ residential properties located along the corridors listed in Section 4.1311.020, unless otherwise  specified.     A.  General.     1.  The Gateway Overlay District landscape area shall be calculated by multiplying the  lot width (measured in feet) along the gateway roadway right‐of‐way times the  depth (in feet) of the landscape buffer. This square footage divided by 1,000  determines the landscape units for calculation.     2.  All tree and plant species shall be from the City preferred plant list or the downtown  gateway tree list, as included in the Development Manual.     3.  Plantings provided to meet the requirements for gateway overlay district  landscaping may also be credited towards the street yard landscaping  requirements.     B.  Scenic and Highway Gateway Overlay Districts.     1.  The landscape area shall contain at least 80 percent (80%) live vegetative coverage  excluding the area required for driveways, sidewalks, bicycle paths, and drainage  features, as allowed with limitations in Section 4.13.0304.11.030. Fencing is not  allowed within the landscape area.     2.  Within the landscape area, plantings are required at a minimum ratio of two shade  trees and five five‐gallon shrubs for every 1,000 square feet of land. Existing trees  that are preserved within the landscape area may count toward the required tree  plantings, pursuant to Section 8.04.020.     C.  Downtown Gateway Overlay District.     Page 72 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards  General Amendment No. 20‐03  ***DRAFT***  Added language is underlined Page 18 of 38 Chapter 8  Deleted language is strikethrough  1.  Landscape Buffer.     A ten‐foot deep landscape buffer is required adjacent to the designated gateway  roadway and will be measured from the property line.     2.  Landscape Area.     a.  The landscape area shall be landscaped and maintained with at least 80 percent  (80%) live vegetative coverage excluding the area required for driveways,  sidewalks, bicycle paths, as allowed with limitations in Section 4.13.0204.11.030.  Fencing is not allowed within the landscape area.     b.  Within the landscape area, plantings are required at a minimum ratio of two  shade trees and two five‐gallon shrubs for every 1,000 square feet of land.  Existing trees that are preserved within the landscape area may count toward  the required tree plantings, pursuant to Section 8.04.020.     c.  Downtown trees shall be spaced in a formal manner and shall meet the location  requirements of Subsection 8.06.030.D. Only specific tree species are allowed in  the Downtown Gateway Overlay, based on their height and size, which can be  found in the plant list in the Development Manual.     Sec. 8.04.060. – Bufferyards.     A.  General.     1.  Bufferyards are required between certain land uses to prevent or minimize potential  nuisances such as noise or light and to provide a transition between uses that may not  be compatible with each other.     2.  Landscaping required within bufferyards shall be provided in addition to the  landscaping required in other sections of this chapter.     3.  All open space within a bufferyard shall be planted with grass or other vegetative  ground cover.     4.  A bufferyard may be designed with clusters of plantings to create a more desirable  design.     5.  No light fixtures, parking, dumpsters, storage, recreation facilities, accessory buildings,  or alleys shall be permitted within a required bufferyard.     Page 73 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards  General Amendment No. 20‐03  ***DRAFT***  Added language is underlined Page 19 of 38 Chapter 8  Deleted language is strikethrough  6.  A bufferyard may be interrupted in order to provide access (pedestrian or vehicular) to  adjacent parcels.     7.  Detention or retention ponds may be permitted to extend into a required bufferyard, but  only if the Development Engineer determines that there is no other feasible option for  the detention of stormwater. If the pond is located within the required bufferyard, the  requirements of this section shall be met in full within the remaining buffer area and  additional screening or aesthetic treatment of the pond may be required depending on  the location and circumstances of the site.     8.  Where buffer requirements are in conflict with other requirements of this Code, the most  restrictive standards shall apply.     9.  Required fencing shall be located along property lines unless physical constraints exist  that would prohibit such placement, as determined by the Director.     B.  Bufferyard Required.     1.  Table 8.04.060 indicates the level of bufferyard required between each zoning district or  land use. Letters ʺaʺ to ʺeʺ correspond with the information below Table 8.04.060 and  identify the type of bufferyard required and the specific situations in which the  bufferyard is required. A box with a ʺ—ʺ indicates that a bufferyard is not required  between those development types. The planting requirements of each type of bufferyard  can be found in Subsection C. below.     Table 8.04.060: Bufferyard Level Required      Adjacent District   ETJ*    AG RE RL RS TF MH TH MF1 MF2 CN C‐ 1   C‐ 3  OF PF BP IN MU‐ DT   Bufferyard  Required   AG  c  c  c  c  c  c  c  c  c  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  c   MH  a  a  a  a  a  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  a   TH  a  a  a  a  a  b  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  a   MF1 a  c  c  c  c  c  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  c   MF2 a  c  c  c  c  c  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  c   CN  a  a  a  a  a  a  a  a  a  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  a   C1  c  c  c  c  c  c  c  c  c  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  a   C3  c  c  c  c  c  c  c  c  c  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  a   OF  c  c  c  c  c  c  c  c  c  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  a   Page 74 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards  General Amendment No. 20‐03  ***DRAFT***  Added language is underlined Page 20 of 38 Chapter 8  Deleted language is strikethrough  PF  c  c  c  c  c  c  c  c  c  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  a   BP  c  c  c  c  c  c  c  c  c  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  a   IN  e  e  e  e  e  e  e  e  e  d  d  d  d  d  —  —  d  e   MU‐  DT  a  a  a  a  a  a  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  a     *  Shall only apply in the case of one or more single‐family homes that are platted or planned for  residential use on the Future Land Use Map in the ETJ.   a. A low level bufferyard is required when non‐residential development, as defined in Section 8.01.040,  is proposed adjacent to residential development.   b. A low level bufferyard is required when a single‐lot development is proposed in a TH District  adjacent to an individual lot development in the MH District or when non‐residential development, as  defined in Section 8.01.040, is proposed adjacent to residential development.   c. A medium level bufferyard is required when non‐residential development, as defined in Section  8.01.040, is proposed adjacent to residential development.   d. A medium level bufferyard is required when a property zoned IN District develops adjacent to a C‐ 1, C‐3, OF, PF, or MU‐DT District.   e. A high level bufferyard is required when a property zoned IN District develops adjacent to a RE,  RL, RS, TF, TH, MF‐1, or MF‐2 District or when adjacent to an existing single‐family home in the AG  District or ETJ.     2.  A non‐residential use developed in a residential zoning district will be required to  provide a low level bufferyard adjacent to residential development.     3.  No bufferyards are required internal to a housing diversity development.     4.  No bufferyards are required internal to a multi‐site unified development that is platted  or site planned as such.     5.  An Administrative Exception to the requirement of a bufferyard may be approved by  the Director per Section 3.16 of this Code if it is determined that the application of a  bufferyard is not necessary and does not meet the intent of this section.     C.  Specific Bufferyard Requirements.     1.  A low level bufferyard shall consist of the following:     a.  A ten‐foot wide planting area;     b.  Two evergreen ornamental trees and four evergreen shrubs per each 50 linear feet  of bufferyard.     2.  A medium level bufferyard shall consist of the following:   Page 75 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards  General Amendment No. 20‐03  ***DRAFT***  Added language is underlined Page 21 of 38 Chapter 8  Deleted language is strikethrough    a.  A 15‐foot wide planting area;     b.  One shade tree, two evergreen ornamental trees and eight evergreen shrubs per  each 50 linear feet of bufferyard.     3.  A high level bufferyard shall consist of the following:     a.  A 30‐foot wide planting area;     b.  A solid six‐foot high screening wall constructed of brick, stone, reinforced concrete  or other similar two‐sided masonry materials; and     c.  Two shade trees and four evergreen ornamental trees per each 50 linear feet of  bufferyard.     Sec. 8.04.070. ‐ Screening.     A.  General.     1.  All planting materials used for screening purposes shall be of an evergreen species.  Screening is required in order to minimize visual impacts from surrounding properties  and rights‐of‐way. Unless otherwise provided, screening requirements are in addition  to all other landscape requirements and may not be credited or counted toward meeting  other requirements.     2.  All mechanical equipment and screening must be shown on the Landscape Plan.     B.  Parking Lot Screening.     1.  Vehicular parking areas shall be screened from street view and adjacent properties using  methods as described below.     a.  All parking lot screening shall be achieved through one of the following methods:     i.  A planting screen (hedge);     ii.  A berm;     iii.  A wall; or     iv.  A combination of any of the above.     Page 76 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards  General Amendment No. 20‐03  ***DRAFT***  Added language is underlined Page 22 of 38 Chapter 8  Deleted language is strikethrough  b.  Live screening shall be a minimum of two feet tall at time of planting, with  predominately a mature height of three to four feet within two years, as determined  by a landscape architect or other licensed professional.     c.  Live screening shall be planted in a prepared bed at least three feet in width.     d.  Plantings, fences, or walls shall be set back a minimum of three feet from the curb  or wheel stop to allow for the overhang of the vehicle.     e.  A change in grade or elevation that provides an equivalent level of screening for the  parking lot as the vegetative screen may be substituted for the requirements above,  as determined by the Director.     2.  Screening shall not be required between properties for parking spaces provided in  conjunction with shared access and/or shared parking between those properties.     C.  Screening of Mechanical Equipment.     1.  All mechanical equipment (e.g. air handling equipment, compressors, duct work,  transformers, and elevator equipment), including roof‐mounted equipment, shall be  screened from view from all public rights‐of‐way and adjoining properties.     2.  Screening shall result in the mechanical equipment blending in with the primary  building, and not appearing separate from the building.     3.  Screening shall consist or be constructed of the following materials, depending on the  location of the equipment to be screened. When possible, materials should be consistent  with the primary building materials.     a.  Planting screens;     b.  Brick, stone, reinforced concrete, or other similar masonry materials;     c.  Redwood, cedar, preservative pressure treated wood, or other similar materials; or     d.  Metal screening or louvers painted to blend with the primary building.     4.  All fence posts shall be rust‐protected metal, concrete‐based masonry, or concrete pillars.     D.  Screening of Waste or Recycling Containers.     1.  All waste and/or recycling containers shall be completely screened from public view at  any adjoining street or property line.   Page 77 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards  General Amendment No. 20‐03  ***DRAFT***  Added language is underlined Page 23 of 38 Chapter 8  Deleted language is strikethrough    2.  All enclosures are to be at least one foot above the height of the waste and/or recycling  container.     3.  Waste and/or recycling container screening shall be maintained by the owner at all times.     4.  Waste and/or recycling containers shall be located at least 15 feet from shade trees.     5.  Dumpsters, compactors, and other similar waste and/or recycling containers.     a.  Dumpsters, compactors, and other similar waste and/or recycling containers shall  be located a minimum of 50 feet from the property line of any single‐ or two‐family  zoned property and no closer to any street than the principal structure.     b.  Dumpsters, compactors, and other similar waste and/or recycling containers shall  be placed on reinforced concrete pads that are a minimum of six inches in thickness  and sloped to drain.     c.  Screening shall be provided on four sides and be comprised of:     i.  Brick, stone, reinforced concrete or other similar masonry materials that have a  similar finish to the primary finish;     ii.  Redwood, cedar, preservative pressure treated wood or other similar materials;  or     iii.  Screening, comprised of large evergreen shrubs, may be proposed as an  alternative if the Director determines it meets the intent of the screening  requirement.     d.  All fence posts shall be made of rust‐protected metal, concrete based masonry, or  concrete pillars.     e.  Dumpster, compactors, and other similar waste and/or recycling containers  enclosures shall have steel framed gates with spring‐loaded hinges or the  equivalent. The enclosure shall have fasteners to keep the gate closed and tiebacks  to secure the gate in the open position when accessed.     f.  Six‐inch diameter concrete filled steel pipes shall be located in corners and possible  impact areas to protect the enclosure from truck operations.     Page 78 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards  General Amendment No. 20‐03  ***DRAFT***  Added language is underlined Page 24 of 38 Chapter 8  Deleted language is strikethrough  6.  Location of waste and/or recycling container enclosures shall also comply with the  standards of the waste collection service provider. When the standards of this section  and the service provider conflict, the standards of this section shall apply.     E.  Screening of Loading Docks.     1.  Loading and service areas shall be located at the side or rear of buildings and be  completely screened from public view at any adjoining street or property line.     2.  Screening shall be provided on three sides of the area by a wall or other screening  mechanism, not less than eight feet in height, comprised of:     a.  A wall that has a similar finish to the primary structure; or     b.  Screening comprised of large evergreen shrubs may be proposed as an alternative  if the Director determines it meets the intent of the screening requirement.     3.  Loading areas shall not be located closer than 50 feet to the property line of a single‐ family or two‐family residence, unless located completely within an enclosed building.     SECTION 8.05. ‐ REVIEW AND APPROVAL PROCESS     Sec. 8.05.010. ‐ Residential Review.     A.  Tree Preservation Plan.     A Tree Preservation Plan shall be required with each residential application for subdivision.  No grading, excavation, trenching, or tree removal shall occur until the Tree Preservation  Plan has been approved and tree protection fencing is in place. The plan shall consist of the  following elements to ensure that each lot is buildable without the removal of Heritage Trees.     1.  Tree Survey and/or Tree Inventory.     a.  A Tree Survey shall graphically identify the location, size, and species of all Heritage  Trees and other existing trees to be credited toward mitigation requirements.     b.  A tree schedule Tree Schedule shall accompany a Tree Survey and shall list each  Heritage Tree shown on the survey and indicate the status of each tree.     c.  Tree Surveys shall be valid for a period of ten years with recertification of any trees  shown on the survey to have a DBH of 24 inches or larger after five years. A new  Tree Survey shall be required for separate phases of long term projects that extend  longer than ten years.   Page 79 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards  General Amendment No. 20‐03  ***DRAFT***  Added language is underlined Page 25 of 38 Chapter 8  Deleted language is strikethrough    d.  In order to promote the preservation of quality trees, reduce the mitigation owed  for contribute value to the built environment, and to identify opportunities to  increase the value and accessibility of impressive trees, a Tree Inventory shall be  required when:     i.  A Tree Preservation Plan proposes to satisfy, in any part, the mitigation  requirements of UDC Section 8.02.040 with the preservation of On‐Site Credit  Trees,    ii. A residential subdivision is to be planned and developed in three (3) or more  phases, or    iii. Alternative tree preservation and mitigation standards are being requested  through a Planned Unit Development (PUD), a Development Agreement, a  Request for the Creation of a Municipal Utility District (MUD), or a  Subdivision Variance.    e.  A Tree Inventory shall be prepared by an arborist licensed by the International  Society of Arboriculture (ISA) and contain the following information.    i. The same information provided in a Tree Survey and a Tree Schedule;    ii. A determination on the health of each tree ‐ i.e. Dead, Poor, Good, Excellent;    iii. Description of any diseases present on trees of “Dead” or “Poor” health;    iv. Proposed measures to be taken to prevent spread of disease through the  project site;    v. Existing canopy cover (as a percentage of the project area); and    vi. A description of a tree’s aesthetic value.    f.  Tree Inventories shall be valid for a period of ten years with recertification of any  trees shown on the survey to have a DBH of ten to 11 inches or DBH of 24 inches or  larger after five years. A new Tree Inventory shall be required for separate phases  of long term projects that extend longer than ten years.    2.  Critical Root Zone (CRZ) Protection Plan, If Applicable.     A CRZ protection plan is required for subdivision Construction Plans where Heritage  Trees are present and are planned to remain showing where tree protection fencing will  Page 80 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards  General Amendment No. 20‐03  ***DRAFT***  Added language is underlined Page 26 of 38 Chapter 8  Deleted language is strikethrough  be located. City tree protection details from the Technical Standards shall be included  with the plan.     3.  Mitigation Plan, If Applicable.     A Mitigation Plan shall include the mitigation required by this chapter any time Heritage  Trees are proposed to be removed. The plan shall list each Heritage Tree species and  DBH to be removed, as identified on the Tree Preservation Plan, and provide  calculations for both mitigation by tree replacement and/or by payment and identify  which mitigation option is proposed to be used. The Urban Forester shall have the final  decision on the selected mitigation option subject to appeal under Section 8.01.020. If  mitigation is to be met by the on‐site planting of trees, a mitigation tree planting plan  shall be included depicting the location, size, and species of the trees, and timing of  installation.     B.  Landscape Plan.     A Landscape Plan, in the form of required plantings shown on the plot plan for the building  permit or a drawing showing requirements prepared by the owner or the ownerʹs  representative, shall be submitted for all new single‐family or two‐family development at  time of building permit review. The plan shall show the proposed location and species of  required trees to be planted and any heritage or landscape credit trees proposed to be  preserved. Trees identified on this plan to be preserved require fenced protection during  construction per Subsection 8.02.030.C. and the Technical Standards.     Sec. 8.05.020. ‐ Non‐Residential Review.     A.  Tree Preservation Plan.     A Tree Preservation Plan is required for every application for non‐residential development  required by and subject to the provisions of this Code. No grading, excavation, trenching, or  tree removal shall occur until the Tree Preservation Plan has been approved. The plan shall  consist of the following elements:   .  1.  Tree Survey and/or Tree Inventory.     a.  The Tree Survey shall graphically identify the location (including if the tree is  located in the floodplain or an area of right‐of‐way dedication), size and species of  all Protected and Heritage trees with a DBH of 12 inches or greater.     b.  Tree Surveys shall be valid for a period of ten years with recertification of any trees  shown on the survey to have a DBH of ten to 11 inches or DBH of 24 inches or larger  Page 81 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards  General Amendment No. 20‐03  ***DRAFT***  Added language is underlined Page 27 of 38 Chapter 8  Deleted language is strikethrough  after five years. A new Tree Survey shall be required for separate phases of long  term projects that extend longer than ten years.     c.  In order to promote the preservation of quality trees, reduce the mitigation owed  for contribute value to the built environment, and to identify opportunities to  increase the value and accessibility of impressive trees, a Tree Inventory shall be  required when:     i. A Tree Preservation Plan proposes to satisfy, in any part, the mitigation  requirements of UDC Section 8.02.040 with the preservation of On‐Site Credit  Trees;    ii. A Site Development Plan is to be developed in three or more phases; or    iii. Alternative tree preservation and mitigation standards are being requested  through a Planned Unit Development (PUD), a Development Agreement, a  Request for the Creation of a Municipal Utility District (MUD), or a Subdivision  Variance.    d.  A Tree Inventory shall be prepared by an arborist licensed by the International  Society of Arboriculture (ISA) and contain the following information.      i. The same information provided in a Tree Survey and a Tree Schedule;    ii. A determination on the health of each tree (i.e. Dead, Poor, Good, Excellent;    iii. Description of any diseases present on trees of “Dead” or “Poor” health;     iv. Proposed measures to be taken to prevent spread of disease through the project  site;    v. Existing canopy cover (as a percentage of the project area); and    vi. A description of a tree’s aesthetic value    e.  Tree Inventories shall be valid for a period of ten years with recertification of any  trees shown on the survey to have a DBH of ten to 11 inches or DBH of 24 inches or  larger after five years. A new Tree Inventory shall be required for separate phases  of long term projects that extend longer than ten years.    2.  Tree Schedule, If Applicable.     Page 82 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards  General Amendment No. 20‐03  ***DRAFT***  Added language is underlined Page 28 of 38 Chapter 8  Deleted language is strikethrough  A tree schedule shall accompany a Tree Survey and shall indicate the status of all  surveyed trees on site.     3.  Critical Root Zone (CRZ) Protection Plan, If Applicable.     A CRZ protection plan is required for every application required by and subject to the  provisions of this Code where Protected or Heritage Trees are present and are planned  to remain showing where tree protection fencing will be located. City tree protection  details from the Technical Standards shall be included with the plan.     4.  Mitigation Plan, If Applicable.     A Mitigation Plan shall include the mitigation required by this chapter any time  protected or Heritage Trees are proposed to be removed. The Mitigation Plan shall  identify each tree to be removed (as indicated on the Tree Preservation Plan), label the  DBH and status (Protected or Heritage Tree), and provide calculations each mitigation  option available and identify which mitigation option is proposed to be used. If  mitigation is to be met by the on‐site planting of trees, a mitigation tree planting plan  shall be included depicting the location, size, and species of the trees, and timing of  installation. If Heritage Tree mitigation is required, a separate line item from the  Protected Tree mitigation shall be required.     B.  Landscape Plan.     A Landscape Plan, prepared by a landscape architect licensed in the State of Texas, is  required to be submitted and approved as part of a Site Plan application prior to issuance of  a building permit for such development. Projects or limits of construction less than 5,000  square feet in size do not require preparation by a landscape architect. A Landscape Plan  shall include the following:     1.  Planting Plan.     The planting plan is a dimensioned and labeled drawing demonstrating compliance  with all applicable requirements of this chapter. The plan shall include all dimensions,  types and quantity of materials, width of bufferyards and overlay districts, and size and  spacing of vegetative materials. Existing trees to be used as landscape credit shall also  be shown with the size indicated. All proposed mechanical equipment shall be depicted.  Plans for projects involving additions to existing sites shall locate and identify any  existing landscaping.     2.  Landscape Summary Table.     Page 83 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards  General Amendment No. 20‐03  ***DRAFT***  Added language is underlined Page 29 of 38 Chapter 8  Deleted language is strikethrough  The landscape summary table delineates all requirements of this chapter as they apply  to the project as well as how those requirements are addressed on the planting plan. The  landscape summary table shall list each planting requirement and indicate the number  of plants required as well as the number proposed. The summary table shall list any  landscape tree credits to be utilized and identify those plantings that are low water users.  The landscape summary table may be located on the planting plan. The template for the  landscape summary table can be found in the UDC Development Manual.     3.  Irrigation Statement.     The landscape architect shall identify on the planting plan the type of irrigation to be  installed for the landscaping design.     4.  Preparerʹs Seal and Statement of Compliance.     The Landscape Plan shall be signed and sealed by the designer and include a statement  of compliance certifying that the plans submitted for approval comply with the  requirements of this chapter. The seal and statement shall be shown on the planting plan.     C.  Changes to Approved Plans.     Adjustments to approved plans during construction that affect trees or landscaping must be  reviewed and approved by the Urban Forester and/or the Planning Department.     Sec. 8.05.030. ‐ Inspection and Approval of Installation.     A.  Residential Installation.     Installation of required landscaping for all new single‐family or two‐family development  shall be inspected at time of final building inspection. The owner or ownerʹs representative  may certify in writing that landscaping has been installed according to the approved plan.     B.  Non‐Residential Installation.     1.  Certification of Landscape Compliance.     Prior to final inspection for certificate of occupancy and once all landscaping has been  installed, the original sealer of the Landscape Plan shall submit a letter certifying the  installed landscaping is in compliance with the requirements of this chapter and the  approved Landscape Plan. If the installed landscaping is not in compliance with the  approved Landscape Plan, a final ʺas‐builtʺ Landscape Plan indicating actual planting  shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and inspection.     Page 84 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards  General Amendment No. 20‐03  ***DRAFT***  Added language is underlined Page 30 of 38 Chapter 8  Deleted language is strikethrough  2.  Irrigation Inspection Letter.     At time of final inspection for certificate of occupancy, the landscape architect shall  provide a letter to the City indicating that the irrigation system has been installed in  accordance with the requirements for irrigation per the approved Landscape Plan.     3.  Inspection.     The Planning Department and the Urban Forester shall, at time of final inspection,  inspect all projects to ensure compliance with the approved Landscape Plan prior to  issuance of a certificate of occupancy. With this inspection, the Urban Forester or the  Director may reject any tree or vegetation that does not reflect the approved plans or  does not meet the requirements of this chapter and require replacement plantings.     Upon the installation of trees, the owner or landscape architect shall notify the Urban  Forester that the work is ready for final inspection. If faulty work or substandard plant  material is found, the owner shall be notified of the necessary changes.     Sec. 8.05.040. ‐ Postponement of Installation of Required Landscaping.     In the case of weather restrictions, seasonal or inclement, the owner of a residential or non‐ residential property may post fiscal surety for the full cost of the materials and installation of any  remaining landscaping. The owner will then have 30 days from either 1) the date of the start of  the next planting season, or 2) the last day of the inclement weather situation to complete the  installation. The City may draw on the fiscal surety and pay to complete the planting if it is  determined that the owner has breached the obligations secured by the fiscal surety. A  conditional certificate of occupancy shall be issued until such time that all landscaping is  installed. See procedures for filing fiscal surety for new development in the UDC Development  Manual.     Sec. 8.05.050. ‐ Alternative Landscape Standards.     Alternative landscape standards, certified by a landscape architect, may be proposed and  submitted to the Director for approval of an Administrative Exception per Section 3.16 of this  Code, provided the aesthetic, buffering, and environmental intent of the requirements of this  chapter are met. The Director may approve alternatives including but not limited to site design,  spacing, locations, numbers, and species. The use of above ground architectural planters may  contribute toward up to ten percent (10%) of the fulfillment of landscape requirements, as  approved by the Director.    SECTION 8.06. ‐ PLANT SELECTION, INSTALLATION, AND MAINTENANCE     Sec. 8.06.010. – General.   Page 85 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards  General Amendment No. 20‐03  ***DRAFT***  Added language is underlined Page 31 of 38 Chapter 8  Deleted language is strikethrough    A.  Unless otherwise noted, the plant selection, installation, and maintenance requirements of  this section shall apply to the required plantings for both residential and non‐residential  development. The standards herein do not apply to those plantings voluntarily planted and  not otherwise required by this chapter.     B.  Plant materials required by this chapter shall conform to the American Standard for Nursery  Stock.     C.  Consideration shall be given to the selection of trees, plants, and planting locations to avoid  problems such as clogged sewers, cracked sidewalks or foundations, and power service  interruptions.     D.  All planting shall be designed to consider the level of expected maintenance and provide a  neat and clean appearance.     E.  All required landscape areas shall consist of at least 50 percent (50%) plant material.     F.  The installation of fountains, public spaces, exterior furniture, bicycle racks, and other  outdoor pedestrian amenities, located within or adjacent to landscaping, is encouraged;  however, hardscape features shall not predominate the use of living plant materials.     Sec. 8.06.020. ‐ Plant Materials and Size Requirements.     A.  Species.   1.  All required plant materials shall be selected from the City preferred plant list. Other  plant materials may be used if determined by the Director to be equivalent in quality,  adaptability, and low‐maintenance as those listed therein.     2.  When more than five trees or ten shrubs are to be planted to meet the requirements of  this chapter, a mix of species shall be provided wherein no more than 25twenty‐five  percent (25%) of plantings may be from the same species.     3.  Of the required plant materials, at least 50 percent (50%) shall be low‐water users, as  identified on the preferred plant list.     4.  Prohibited plant species, as identified on the prohibited plant species list in the UDC  Development Manual, are required to be removed at time of site development, unless  they are located in an area designated on the Landscape Plan as an approved natural  area. The retention of any of these species must be based on the health and welfare of  surrounding Protected and Heritage Trees and must be approved by the Director. No  new plants identified on the prohibited plant species list shall be installed and existing  plants are excluded from meeting any planting requirements.   Page 86 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards  General Amendment No. 20‐03  ***DRAFT***  Added language is underlined Page 32 of 38 Chapter 8  Deleted language is strikethrough    5.  Controlled plant species, as identified on the controlled plant species list in the UDC  Development Manual, are excluded from meeting any planting requirements. No new  plants identified on the controlled plant species list shall be planted, unless approved by  the Director. Controlled plant species do not have to be removed from a site.     B.  Minimum Size Requirements for Plants and Trees.     Unless otherwise specified in this chapter, plants and trees required by this chapter shall be  of the following minimum sizes at the time of planting.     1.  Landscape Trees.     a.  Shade trees planted to meet the requirements of this chapter shall be a minimum of  three caliper inches measured at six inches above finished grade or have a three‐ inch DBH.     b.  Ornamental trees planted to meet the requirements of this chapter shall be at least  15‐gallon container grown nursery stock.     2.  Mitigation Trees.     Mitigation trees, as required by Section 8.02.040 of this chapter, shall be a minimum of  three caliper inches measured at six inches above finished grade or have a three‐inch  DBH.     3.  Shrubs.     Shrubs planted to meet the requirements of this chapter shall be at least one‐gallon  container grown nursery stock, unless otherwise specified by this Code.     4.  Vines, Ornamental Grasses and Ground Cover.     a.  Vines planted to meet the requirements of this chapter shall be at least one‐gallon  container‐grown nursery stock.     b.  Groundcover planted to meet the requirements of this chapter shall be at least four‐ inch container‐grown nursery stock.     c.  Ornamental grasses planted to meet the requirements of this chapter shall be at least  one‐gallon container‐grown nursery stock.     C.  Lawn or Turf Grasses.   Page 87 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards  General Amendment No. 20‐03  ***DRAFT***  Added language is underlined Page 33 of 38 Chapter 8  Deleted language is strikethrough    1.  Grassed areas should be planted with drought resistant species normally grown as  permanent lawns, such as Bermuda, Zoysia, Buffalo, or any other variety as approved  by the Director. Heavily shaded properties that receive less than six hours of sun may  be planted with Saint Augustine or other shade grass.     2.  Grassed areas may be sodded, plugged, sprigged, or seeded except that solid sod shall  be used in swales or on 3:1 or greater slopes or other areas subject to erosion.     a.  For all other areas where sod is not required, the use of sod shall be limited to the  remaining balance of the percentage of plant materials not classified as low water  users (for example, if fifty percent (50%) of plant materials used are classified as  low water users, sodded areas shall be limited to fifty percent (50%) of all landscape  area).     b.  The restriction to the use of sod does not apply to areas designated as dog parks,  open recreation/common amenity areas or parks, or where sod is required by this  Code.     3.  Synthetic or artificial lawns or plants are notmay be allowed provided the following  standards are met.:     a.  Synthetic or artificial lawns may be used in playscapes, sports fields, and other  similar recreational fields, and areas that are screened from streets and adjacent  properties. On residential properties, synthetic or artificial lawns shall be limited to  the rear yard only.    b.  Synthetic or artificial lawns shall be certified by a Professional Engineer that it will  allow rainwater to infiltrate at the same rate as natural turf.     c.  Synthetic or artificial lawns shall be prohibited within required bufferyards and  gateway overlay district landscape areas.    d.  Synthetic or artificial lawns shall be made of polyethylene or polypropylene.  Residential properties may use a nylon material. Other similar materials may be  considered by the Urban Forester, or designee.     e.  Synthetic or artificial lawns shall utilize heat blocking or other dissipating features  to limit heat gain.    f.  Synthetic or artificial lawns shall be a two‐tone color or better.    Page 88 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards  General Amendment No. 20‐03  ***DRAFT***  Added language is underlined Page 34 of 38 Chapter 8  Deleted language is strikethrough  4.  Winter Rye shall be considered only as a temporary measure to reduce soil erosion  through the winter season and shall be completely replaced with permanent turf grass  during the following planting season.     Sec. 8.06.030. ‐ Installation Requirements.     A.  All required landscape materials shall be installed according to American Association of  Nurserymen (AAN) standards and as per the Technical Standards.     B.  In order to conserve water, reduce maintenance, and promote plant health, plant species  should be staggered or clustered as necessary based on their water and light needs and  growth rate and size.     C.  Landscaping shall be designed to meet the Cityʹs traffic safety standards as adopted in the  Code of Ordinances and must maintain safe and unobstructed visibility along and at  intersections of roadways, driveways, drive aisles, access easements, recreational paths, and  sidewalks.     D.  Location.     1.  Required landscaping shall be placed upon that portion of a tract or lot that is being  developed. Undeveloped portions of a tract or lot shall not be considered landscaped,  except as specifically approved by the Director.     2.  All new shade trees shall be planted so they have a minimum pervious area of four feet  from the trunk in all directions.     3.  All new ornamental trees shall be planted so they have a minimum pervious area of  three feet from the trunk in all directions.     4.  Trees or plants shall not be placed in locations within easements that may interfere with  site drainage.     5.  Ground cover shall be planted to provide for quick coverage and to discourage erosion  and weed growth.     6.  Tree and Utility and Signage Conflicts.     a.  Special attention shall be given to the use of appropriate species located under or  adjacent to overhead power lines or near underground utility lines, or near existing  and proposed signage. Plans proposing species that do not address this provision  will not be approved.     Page 89 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards  General Amendment No. 20‐03  ***DRAFT***  Added language is underlined Page 35 of 38 Chapter 8  Deleted language is strikethrough  b.  Overhead power lines require the planting of low growing trees, maturing to a  height and spread not encroaching within five feet of the lines.     c.  When there is a conflict between the location of required trees and overhead or  underground utility lines, or signage, the Director may approve alternative tree  locations, spacing, species, and/or numbersone or more of the following options  may be used to satisfy the minimum number of trees required.:    i.  Required trees may be planted so that no more than twenty‐five percent (25%)  of the mature tree canopy size encroaches onto a utility easement, sign, or other  point of conflict; or    ii.  When applicable, the required gateway landscape area may be extended a  minimum of ten (10) feet beyond any conflicting utility easement; or    iii.  Additional ornamental trees and shrubs may be used to meet required shade  trees at a ratio defined below:     Two (2) ornamental trees shall be planted for every shade tree, or     One (1) ornamental tree and twenty (20) shrubs shall be planted for every  shade tree.    7.  Landscaping in the Right‐of‐Way.     a.  The placement of shrubs, trees, irrigation, or hardscape features in the right‐of‐way  shall require approval of a License to Encroach. Turf grasses shall not require a  License to Encroach. See the UDC Development Manual for more information.     b.  The City may at any time require such landscaping to be removed, without  responsibility or liability to the City, and require replacement of any required  plantings at the ownerʹs expense.     c.  No landscaping, excluding grass, shall be placed in an area of right‐of‐way where a  roadway improvement has been funded for such location, unless and until such  project has been completed.     E.  Landscape berms installed to meet the provisions of this chapter shall have a maximum side  slope of three feet to one foot and shall be stabilized with vegetation, including turf grass or  groundcover, to prevent washout. Planting beds are allowed on landscape berms.     Sec. 8.06.040. ‐ Maintenance Requirements.     Page 90 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards  General Amendment No. 20‐03  ***DRAFT***  Added language is underlined Page 36 of 38 Chapter 8  Deleted language is strikethrough  A.  Maintenance Responsibility.     The current property owner or the manager or agent of the owner, shall be responsible for  the maintenance of all required tree, and plant materials and landscape areas. A homeowners  association shall assume responsibility for the maintenance of designated common areas.     B.  Health and Viability of Plant Materials.     1.  Landscaping shall be sufficiently fertilized and watered as necessary to maintain the  plant material in a healthy condition.     2.  Landscape areas shall be maintained so as to present a healthy, neat, and orderly  appearance at all times and shall be kept free of refuse and debris.     C.  Dead Trees, Plants or Materials.     1.  Maintenance will include the replacement of all dead plant material, including  mitigation trees, if that material was used to meet any of the requirements of this chapter.     2.  Dead trees or plants shall be replaced with the same amount, type, and size of landscape  material originally required or an approved substitute.     3.  Existing trees that were required to be preserved during site construction must survive  for at least a two‐year period after the certificate of occupancy is issued or shall be  replaced according to the current mitigation requirements of this chapter.     4.  Dead trees or plants shall be replaced within six months of notification or by the  beginning of the next planting season, whichever comes first.     D.  Protected or Heritage Tree Damage.     No act shall be allowed, accidentally or otherwise, that may reasonably be expected to cause  a Protected or Heritage Tree to die or be damaged or to otherwise harm the aesthetic value,  including, but not limited to, topping or excessively pruning more than 30 percent (30%) of  the viable portion of a Protected (non‐residential only) or Heritage Tree crown; inappropriate  shaping (i.e., topiary); damaging the root system; compacting the soil; changing the natural  grade or paving. The remedies for such act shall be determined as follows:     1.  If the Urban Forester determines the tree has been damaged, the property owner shall  be required to take action to assure the future vitality of the tree, including but not  limited to chemical treatment, construction of protective barriers, or any other methods  as may be required by the Urban Forester.     Page 91 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards  General Amendment No. 20‐03  ***DRAFT***  Added language is underlined Page 37 of 38 Chapter 8  Deleted language is strikethrough  2.  If the Urban Forester determines that the damage is so great that the tree is no longer  reasonably sustainable, the tree shall be required to be removed at the expense of the  property owner, in addition to the mitigation provisions in Section 8.02.040 and possible  penalties pursuant to Chapter 15. Mitigation for projects without active tree removal  permits or approval shall be based on the mitigation provisions at the time of the  violation, not the standards at the time of platting or other approval.     E.  Heritage Tree Pruning Permit.     Pursuant to Section 3.23 of this Code, it shall be unlawful to prune a Heritage Tree without  an approved Heritage Tree pruning permit. All approved pruning must be performed by an  International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Arborist or under the supervision of an  ISA Certified Arborist, and must follow the American National Standards Institute (ANSI)  A300 standards. Heritage Tree pruning permits do not apply to lots containing constructed  single‐family and two‐family dwellings.     F.  Synthetic or artificial lawn.    Synthetic or artificial lawn shall be maintained so as to maintain its pervious surface  condition.     Sec. 8.06.050. ‐ Irrigation Requirements.     A.  All non‐residential development shall use one of the following irrigation methods to ensure  survival of the required plant material in landscaped areas:     1.  Conventional System.     An automatic or manual underground irrigation system that may be a conventional  spray or bubbler type heads.     2.  Drip Irrigation System.     An automatic or manual underground irrigation system in conjunction with a water‐ saving system such as a drip or micro irrigation system.     3.  Temporary and Above‐Ground Watering.     Landscape areas utilizing low water usage plants and installation techniques, including  areas planted with native grasses and wildflowers, may use a temporary and above‐ ground system providing irrigation necessary to establish the areas.     B.  Trees shall have at least one bubbler installed per newly installed tree.   Page 92 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards  General Amendment No. 20‐03  ***DRAFT***  Added language is underlined Page 38 of 38 Chapter 8  Deleted language is strikethrough    C.  Irrigation lines shall be arranged so as to not require trenching that will affect the roots of  any trees to be preserved. Lateral trenching should be used when it is necessary to trench in  the CRZ and areas should be hand dug.     D.  No irrigation shall be required for undisturbed natural areas or undisturbed existing trees,  as approved by the Director. Tree wells and islands count as disturbance when containing  existing trees and will require irrigation.     E.  Irrigation systems shall be programmed to meet the watering restrictions of the water  provider and to not water during rain events.    Sec. 8.06.060. ‐ Removal of Required Landscape Trees, Shrubs and Turf.     If a property owner of a non‐residential development wishes to remove healthy trees, shrubs, or  turf that were part of a previous approval, a request may be made to the City using the procedures  in the Development Manual. Based on the information submitted, the City will decide if the  request will be granted on a case‐by‐case basis. Justifiable reasons for such requests include, but  are not limited to:     1.  Tree canopies have become crowded and are hindering growth of other trees;     2.  Trees are blocking existing signage;     3.  Trees are causing a potential line‐of‐sight hazard; and     4.  The overall health of the tree.     For any tree approved for removal, mitigation is required using the calculations in Subsection  8.02.040.C. Mitigation trees must be planted along the same side of the building or same area of  the parking lot, and in the instance that the removed tree was planted to satisfy a landscape  requirement under Section 8.04, the replacement tree must be planted in the same landscape area  (i.e. gateway landscape area, street yard, etc.) and reach a similar size as the removed tree(s),  unless an alternative location or species is approved by the Urban Forester.  Other conditions of  approval may be required by the Urban Forester and/or the Director.     ***  ***      Page 93 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards General Amendment No. 20-03 ***DRAFT*** Added language is underlined Page 1 of 1 Chapter 11 Deleted language is strikethrough Chapter 11 - ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION *** SECTION 11.02. - IMPERVIOUS COVER These impervious cover limitations are adopted to minimize negative flooding effects from stormwater runoff and to control, minimize, and abate water pollution resulting from urban runoff of rainwater or other non-point specific sources, pursuant to Texas Water Code § 26.177. *** Sec. 11.02.020. – Waiver of Impervious Cover Limitations. The Director shall increase the amount of impervious cover as specifically listed below, upon verification by the Development Engineer that the development meets the waiver criteria. No combination of waivers may allow impervious cover to exceed the maximum provided. Partial credit of each of the following waivers may be granted. A. Approved Waivers. *** 7. Plant materials classified as low water users (Three Percent (3%)). The Director may consider an increase in the amount of permitted impervious cover by up to three percent (3%) for the use of plant materials classified as low water users. A one percent (1%) increase in impervious cover may be granted for every additional ten percent (10%) of the total plants used classified as low water users. *** *** Page 94 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards General Amendment No. 20-03 ***DRAFT*** Added language is underlined Page 1 of 4 Chapter 16 Deleted language is strikethrough Chapter 16 – DEFINITIONS *** SECTION 16.02. - DEFINITIONS The following definitions describe terms found in this Code. *** Bond. A sealed instrument under which a person or entity is obligated to pay an agreed-upon amount of money on or before a specified expiration date or action. Binding security; firm assurance. Branch (tree). A part of a tree that extends from the trunk and forms a part of the canopy. Bufferyard. A combination of physical spaces and vertical elements such as plants, berms, fences, or walls, the purpose of which is to separate and screen incompatible land uses from each other. *** Rooming House. A residential building other than a hotel or apartment where lodging and possibly meals are provided by pre-arrangement for definite periods for compensation. No cooking facilities are provided in individual living units. Root (tree). The part of a tree or plant typically underground which absorbs nutrients and moisture, stores food, and as an anchor and supports the tree or plant. Rural Residential Subdivision. A subdivision that is zoned either AG (Agriculture) or RE (Residential Estate) if within the City Limits or a subdivision in the extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) that is platted for single-family residential development. *** Tree. Any self-supporting woody perennial plant species usually having a single trunk diameter of no less than two inches at maturity, measured one foot above grade, and which normally grows in Central Texas to an overall minimum height of 12 feet. Tree Canopy. The horizontal extension of a tree's branches in all directions from its trunk. Tree, Credit. Existing trees on a site with a DBH between six and 11 inches that may be used toward the required mitigation or landscape trees. Page 95 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards General Amendment No. 20-03 ***DRAFT*** Added language is underlined Page 2 of 4 Chapter 16 Deleted language is strikethrough Tree Damage. Excavation or disturbance within the CRZ such as by cutting roots, grading, pouring impervious material such as concrete or asphalt, installing utilities or installing irrigation that is not related to irrigating that specific Protected or Heritage Tree; chemical poisoning; utilizing the area within the tree protection fence for storage of equipment or vehicular traffic and other activities; removing bark greater than three inches; breaking or splitting of the main trunk; or any act compromising the health or structural integrity of the tree. Tree, Dead. Any tree in which the canopy has died back 80 percent (80%) or greater as determined by the Urban Forester. Tree, Diseased. A tree with a condition that impairs the performance of one or more vital functions; usually associated with infectious conditions. Tree, Heritage. Any of the following trees that has a 26-inch diameter when measured at four and one-half feet above grade: Live Oak, Post Oak, Shumard Oak, Bur Oak, Chinquapin Oak, Monterey Oak, Bald Cypress, American Elm, Cedar Elm, Pecan, Walnut, Texas Ash, or Southern Magnolia. 1. Any tree or stand of trees designated by Resolution of the City Council to be of historical value or of significant community benefit. 2. The term "Heritage Trees" does not include Hackberry, Chinaberry, Ashe Juniper (Cedar), Mountain Cedar, Blueberry Juniper, Post Cedar, Chinese Tallow, or Mesquite. Tree Mitigation. The process to address the removal of Protected or Heritage Trees either through crediting existing trees, planting new replacement trees or paying fees-in-lieu. Tree, Multi-Trunk. A tree with more than one trunk. These trees are to measured according to the method established in this Code. Tree, Ornamental. Smaller tree species, reaching a height of approximately ten to 25 feet at maturity. Such trees provide screening and accent elements. Tree Preservation Plan. A plan that graphically represents the Tree Schedule and identifies Protected Trees and Heritage Trees, indicating those being preserved and those being proposed for removal. The Tree Preservation Plan may be shown on the Tree Survey. Tree, Protected. For purposes of this Code, a "protected" tree is any tree with a DBH of 12 inches or greater. The following species of trees are excluded from protected tree status Chinaberry, Hackberry, Ashe Juniper (Cedar), Chinese Tallow, and Mesquite. Tree Removal. As it applies to protected trees means, the uprooting, severing the main trunk of a tree, or any activity which causes, or may reasonably be expected to cause a tree to die. Activities such as, but not limited to, damage inflicted upon the root system by machinery, storage of materials, or soil compaction; substantially changing the natural grade above the root system or Page 96 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards General Amendment No. 20-03 ***DRAFT*** Added language is underlined Page 3 of 4 Chapter 16 Deleted language is strikethrough around the trunk; excessive pruning; or paving with concrete or asphalt within the CRZ or impervious materials in a manner which may reasonably be expected to kill the tree. Tree Schedule. A list indicating the status of all trees on site; Protected Trees preserved, Protected Trees removal, dead, Heritage Trees preserved, proposed Heritage Tree removal, not a protected species, or Credit Tree, along with species name and tree diameter in one table. Typically, a Tree Schedule is included on the Tree Survey. Tree, Shade. The largest plants in the landscape that provide the overhead structure needed for shading and under which other plants live and grow. They spread and give overhead structure when they reach maturity. Tree Stand. A contiguous grouping or cluster of trees which can exhibit characteristics similar to one another including, but not limited to, size, species, health, and age. Tree, Street. An approved Shade Tree planted within the right-of-way in accordance with this Code. Tree Survey. A drawing showing the size, location, species and critical root zone of all existing Protected and Heritage Trees, and includes a table summarizing the total number of inches, in accordance with generally accepted methods of International Society of Arboriculture (ISA). See the UDC Development Manual and the Landscape and Tree Technical Standards for more information on the submission requirements. *** Truck Terminal. A facility where commercial trucks, including tractors and trailer units, are housed, stored, maintained or repaired. Accessory uses may include offices, fueling or washing and the temporary storage of loads prior to shipment. Trunk (tree). The primary structural support of a tree, or the primary stem of a tree, as district from the branches and roots. Two-Family. The use of a single lot or parcel for two dwelling units contained within a single building. See also "Duplex." *** Vehicle. See "Automobile". Vehicle Display and Sales Area. The area specifically reserved for the display and storage of vehicles actively for sale. This area shall not include areas reserved for required parking spaces, parking of vehicles in service, or areas reserved for the storage of vehicles not actively for sale. Page 97 of 116 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards General Amendment No. 20-03 ***DRAFT*** Added language is underlined Page 4 of 4 Chapter 16 Deleted language is strikethrough Vehicle Storage. Long-term storage (over 72 hours) of operable or inoperable vehicles. Typically includes storage of tow-aways or impound yards, but this term excludes dismantling or salvage. *** *** Page 98 of 116 1 Tree Preservation and Landscape Standards Adjustments and Clean-up UDC Advisory Committee March 10, 2021 Page 99 of 116 2 Purpose •Provide a recommendation to City Council on proposed amendments to the Unified Development Code (UDC) related to tree preservation and landscape standards Page 100 of 116 8 Amendment Review Process •Tree Presentation and Landscape standards clean-up included in the UDC’s General Amendment List for 2020 •Address conflicts, ambiguity, and include alternative options •Included implementation of water conservation efforts for non-residential landscape standards •2020 General Amendment List approved by City Council in July 2020 Page 101 of 116 9 Amendment Review Process •Tree Preservation and Landscape standards amendment broken into 3 focus areas TP Tree Preservation Removal Mitigation SY Street yards, Gateways Parking SB W Screening Water Conservation Page 102 of 116 10 Issues Submitted Tree Preservation, Removal, and Mitigation Issue No.Relevant UDC Issues Requestor TP.01 8.05.010.A.1 and 8.05.020.A.1 Consider establishing a threshold for identifying which multi-trunk trees must be included on a survey based on the DBH of the largest trunk.UDCAC TP.02 16.02 Consider adding a definition for tree branch and tree trunk.UDCAC TP.03 N/A Consider adding a definition for “hardwood” and “softwood” trees as some might have different interpretations.UDCAC TP.04 8.02.020.A and 16.02 Exclude all cedar (ash-juniper and mountain cedar) trees from the protected trees definition.UDCAC TP.05 8.02.040.C.2.a.i Consider excluding ornamental trees from the definition of protected trees.UDCAC TP.06 3.23, 8.02.030.B.3 Clarify applicability of City approval for the removal of protected trees within a right-of -way or public utility easement and assessment of mitigation fees. Staff TP.07 8.05.010.A.1 and 8.05.020.A.1 Consider requiring a Tree Inventory for new projects and phased projects whose surveys need to be update after 5 and 10 years. Staff Page 103 of 116 11 Tree Preservation, Removal, and Mitigation, cont’d. Issue No.Relevant UDC Issues Requestor TP.08 3.16.020.C and 8.02.050.B.Consider prioritizing the preservation of protected trees to allow flexibility in site design elements (I.e. parking layout, monument sign location). Clarify the existing process for Heritage Trees. Staff TP.09 8.02.030.F and 8.02.040.C.2.a.ii Consider establishing boundaries for calculating protected and heritage trees on projects (i.e. floodplain, ROW, Limit of Construction, Phase or Section specific) Staff, Public T P. 1 0 8.05.010.A.1 and 8.05.020.A.1 Consider requiring additional information on the health of a protected and heritage tree to address disease control issues as it relates to tree preservation. Staff T P. 1 1 8.02.030.E.2.b, 8.02.040.C , 8.02.040.C.4.b and c, 8.05.010.A.3, and 8.05.020.A.4 Consider additional options for tree mitigation.Staff, Public T P. 1 2 8.06.060 Consider altering the situations in which required landscaping trees can be removed –specifically related to signage. Staff Page 104 of 116 12 Street yards, Gateways and Parking Issue No.Relevant UDC Issues Requestor SY.1 8.03.030; 8.06.020.C.3 and 8.06.040.F Consider allowing the use of artificial turf for single-family residential Public SY.2 8.04.030 Consider establishing different or alternative street yard requirements, particularly for projects with buildings at great distance from the road and/or phased projects. Public SY.3 4.11, 8.04.050 Clarify the applicability of Gateway landscape requirements (and how these relate to other landscape requirements)Staff SY.4 8.04.040.C Clarify the applicability of landscape requirements for inventory lots related to an auto sales use Staff, Public SY.5 8.06.030.D.6 Consider measures or alternatives to address conflicts between signage, utilities and easements, and landscape requirements Staff, UDCAC Page 105 of 116 13 Screening and Water Conservation Issue No.Relevant UDC Issues Requestor SBW.1 8.04.070.D Clarify screening requirements for alternative waste containers Staff SBW.2 8.06.020.C.3, 8.06.040.F, 11.02.020.A.7 Review current nonresidential landscaping requirements regarding the city’s water conservation efforts Public, UDCAC, P&Z Page 106 of 116 14 Amendment Review Process UDCAC introduction to the Tree Preservation & Landscape ordinances Discussion on Action Plan UDCAC finalizes list of Tree Preservation & Landscape issuesDiscuss Tree Preservation, Removals & Mitigation Confirm direction on Tree Preservation, Removals, and Mitigation Discuss Street yards, Gateways, & Parking Confirm direction on Street yards, Gateways, & Parking Discuss Screening & Water Conservation Confirm direction on Screening & Water Conservation Validate direction on draft Ordinance Public Outreach efforts UDCAC and City Staff begin to prepare draft amendments. 12/910/149/98/12 11/11 Page 107 of 116 15 Amendment Review Process Draft OrdinancePublic ReviewP&Z and CC update and discussion UDCAC recommendation to P&Z and City Council P&Z recommendation to City Council City Council Approval UDCAC and City Staff begin to prepare draft amendments. AprApr Mar 10Jan/Feb Page 108 of 116 16 City Council Workshop •Feb 9 -Tree Preservation, Removal and Mitigation •No changes to proposed terms and recommended amendments •Two (2) new items for consideration 1)Consider allowing smaller trees (smaller than 6 inches) to be counted as credit trees 2)Explore the option of allowing trees planted on residential lots as on-site replacement trees •Mar 9 -Street yards, gateway and parking, and screening and water conservation to be discussed at the next meeting Page 109 of 116 52 Public Review –January 2021 •Online posting (Jan 19) •Survey (Jan 19) •Email announcement (Jan 25) •Office hours (2 hrs; Jan 20, Jan 25, Jan 27, Feb 1, Feb 5) Window for submission of comments (Jan 19 –Feb 5) Page 110 of 116 53 Comments received •Consider allowing new trees on residential lots as on-site replacement trees •Tree mitigation fee is more cost effective than planting new tree. Revise mitigation fee to encourage preservation or more on-site planting •Provide list of recommended trees for tight areas, parking, sidewalks, and buildings, as well as low water users (Development Manual) •Allow artificial turf on playscapes and recreational fields that are not always screened from the road or adjacent property •Tree preservation requirements may cause issues for large industrial sites •Support 3rd class of tree protection •Clarification on proposed amendments Page 111 of 116 54 Synthetic Turf •Synthetic or artificial lawns may be used in playscapes, sports fields, and other similar recreational fields, and areas that are screened from streets and adjacent properties. On residential properties, synthetic or artificial lawns shall be limited to the rear yard only. •Synthetic or artificial lawns shall be made of polyethylene or polypropylene. Residential properties may use a nylon material. Other similar materials may be considered by the Urban Forester, or designee. Page 112 of 116 55 Tree Removal Permit (Exemptions) •Single-family or two-family residential lots approved and platted prior to February 13, 2007, are exempt from the requirement of a heritage tree removal permit. However, single-family and two-family lots platted after February 13, 2007 are subject to the heritage tree protection provisions in Section 8.02, which shall apply to the developer, and home builder and homeowner. Page 113 of 116 57 Next Steps Draft OrdinancePublic ReviewP&Z and CC update and discussion UDCAC recommendation to P&Z and City Council P&Z recommendation to City Council City Council Approval UDCAC and City Staff begin to prepare draft amendments. AprMar 10Jan/Feb City Council Workshop Apr Page 114 of 116 58 Requested Action •Recommendation to City Council on proposed amendments to the Unified Development Code (UDC) related to tree preservation and landscape standards Page 115 of 116 City of Georgetown, Texas Unified Development Code Advisory Committee March 10, 2021 S UB J E C T: Update on the Unified Development C ode (UDC ) amendment proc es s , and the 2020 UDC Annual R eview P lan, S chedule and Next S teps -- Andreina Dávila-Q uintero, AI C P, C urrent P lanning Manager IT E M S UMMARY: T he purpos e of this item is to dis cus s the Unified Development C ode (UDC ) amendment process, and provide an update on the UDC Annual R eview P lan, tentative s chedule and next s teps. In addition, C ity S taff and members of the UDC AC will disc uss the tas ks identified at the previous meeting, as well as new tas ks to be c ompleted for the next meeting. F eedbac k and information received on eac h task will be inc orporated when related UDC topics are sc heduled and presented for disc ussion. F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: None. S UB MIT T E D B Y: Andreina Dávila-Q uintero, AI C P, C urrent P lanning Manager Page 116 of 116