HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda_HARC_10.23.2014Notice of Meeting for the
Historic and Architectural Review Commission Historic and Architectural Review
Commission
of the City of Georgetown
October 23, 2014 at 6:00 PM
at Council and Courts Building, 101 E. 7th Street Georgetown, TX 78626
The City of Georgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
If you require assistance in participating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the
ADA, reasonable assistance, adaptations, or accommodations will be provided upon request. Please
contact the City at least four (4) days prior to the scheduled meeting date, at (512) 930-3652 or City
Hall at 113 East 8th Street for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711.
Regular Session
(This Regular Session may, at any time, be recessed to convene an Executive Session for any purpose
authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code 551.)
A The Historic and Architectural Review Commission (HARC), appointed by the Mayor and the
City Council, is responsible for hearing and taking final action on Certificates of Design
Compliance applications based upon the City Council adopted Downtown and Old Town Design
Guidelines and Unified Development Code. The Commission may, at any time, recess the Regular
Session to convene an Executive Session at the request of the Chair, a Commissioner, the Director
or legal counsel for any purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code
Chapter 551.
Welcome and Meeting Procedures:
Staff Presentation
Applicant Presentation (Limited to ten minutes unless stated otherwise by the Commission)
Questions from Commission to Staff and Applicant
Comments from Citizens*
Applicant Response
Commission Deliberative Process
Commission Action
*Those who wish to speak must turn in a speaker form, located at the back of the room, to the
recording secretary before the item they wish to address begins. Each speaker will be permitted to
address the Commission one time only for a maximum of three minutes.
Legislative Regular Agenda
B Discussion and possible action to approve the minutes from the September 25, 2014 regular
meeting.
C Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for
exterior alterations for the property located at 202 South Austin Avenue, bearing the legal
description of City of Georgetown, Block 9, Lot 1-2, 7-8 (E/PT)
D Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for
infill construction for the property located at 913 Walnut Street bearing the legal description of
Dimmit Addition, Block 90 (PT), 0.1652 acres
E Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for
infill construction, exterior alterations and signage for the property located at 202South College
Street, bearing the legal description of Lots 15-20, College Place, Cabinet 1, Slide 134
F Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for
exterior alterations and signage for the property located at 204 East 8th Street bearing the legal
description of Glasscock Addition, Block 9, Lot 7-8, 0.3306 acres.
G Discussion and possible action to approve an Alternative Parking Plan for the property located at
204 East 8th Street, bearing the legal description of Glasscock Addition, Block 9, Lots 7-8, 0.3306
acres
H Discussion of proposed historic district street signs
I Discussion of proposed Historic and Architectural Review Commission UDC revisions - Laurie
Brewer, Assistant City Manager
J Questions and comments from Commissioners in Training.
K Staff updates and reminder of future meetings.
Adjournment
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
I, Jessica Brettle, City Secretary for the City of Georgetown, Texas, do hereby certify that this Notice
of Meeting was posted at City Hall, 113 E. 8th Street, a place readily accessible to the general public
at all times, on the ______ day of __________________, 2014, at __________, and remained so
posted for at least 72 continuous hours preceding the scheduled time of said meeting.
____________________________________
Jessica Brettle, City Secretary
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
The Historic and Architectural Review Commission (HARC), appointed by the Mayor and the
City Council, is responsible for hearing and taking final action on Certificates of Design
Compliance applications based upon the City Council adopted Downtown and Old Town Design
Guidelines and Unified Development Code. The Commission may, at any time, recess the Regular
Session to convene an Executive Session at the request of the Chair, a Commissioner, the Director
or legal counsel for any purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code
Chapter 551.
Welcome and Meeting Procedures:
Staff Presentation
Applicant Presentation (Limited to ten minutes unless stated otherwise by the Commission)
Questions from Commission to Staff and Applicant
Comments from Citizens*
Applicant Response
Commission Deliberative Process
Commission Action
*Those who wish to speak must turn in a speaker form, located at the back of the room, to the
recording secretary before the item they wish to address begins. Each speaker will be permitted to
address the Commission one time only for a maximum of three minutes.
ITEM SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None
SUBMITTED BY:
Karen Frost, Recording Secretary
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Discussion and possible action to approve the minutes from the September 25, 2014 regular
meeting.
ITEM SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None.
SUBMITTED BY:
Karen Frost, Recording Secretary
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for
exterior alterations for the property located at 202 South Austin Avenue, bearing the legal
description of City of Georgetown, Block 9, Lot 1-2, 7-8 (E/PT)
ITEM SUMMARY:
The City of Georgetown is in receipt of a request for a CDC for exterior paint for the commercial
structure located at 202 South Austin Avenue. According to the submitted letter of intent, the
applicant recently purchased the building and wishes to repaint the exterior.
Staff recommends approval of the request based on the findings that the request meets the
approval criteria of Section(s) 3.13.030of the Unified Development Code (UDC), as outlined in
the attached Staff Report.
The affirmative vote of the majority of the HARC members is required to approve the CDC
request.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The applicant paid the required fees.
SUBMITTED BY:
Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
CDC-2014-038 Staff Report Backup Material
CDC-2014-038 Plan Review Backup Material
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-038 202 South Austin Avenue Page 1 of 4
Meeting Date: October 23, 2014 Agenda Item: C
File Number: CDC-2014-038
AGENDA ITEM DESCRIPTION
Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for
exterior alterations for the property located at 202 South Austin Avenue, bearing the legal description
of City of Georgetown, Block 9, Lot 1-2, 7-8 (E/PT).
AGENDA ITEM DETAILS
Project Name: 202 South Austin Avenue Exterior Paint
Applicant: Patti Colbert
Property Owner: Patti Colbert
Property Address: 202 South Austin Avenue
Legal Description: City of Georgetown, Block 9, Lot 1-2, 7-8 (E/PT).
Historic Overlay: Downtown, Area 2
Case History: This is the first public hearing for the property
HISTORIC CONTEXT
Date of construction: ca. 1930
Historic Resources Survey Level of Priority: Low priority
National Register Designation: None
Texas Historical Commission Designation: None
APPLICANT’S REQUEST
The applicant requests a Certificate of Design Compliance for exterior paint for the Low Priority
historic structure located at 202 South Austin Avenue.
APPLICABLE DESIGN GUIDELINES
The following guidelines are applicable to the proposed scope of work in accordance with the adopted
Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines:
GUIDELINES FINDINGS
11.1 Develop a color scheme for the entire building
that coordinates all the façade elements.
Complies
11.2 Paint colors should enhance individual building
elements while creating a unified, coordinated
appearance for the entire structure.
Complies
11.3 A muted color is preferred for the base color of
most buildings.
Complies
11.5 In general, use bright colors for accents only. Complies
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-038 202 South Austin Avenue Page 2 of 4
GUIDELINES FINDINGS
11.7 Wooden structures must be painted. Complies
STAFF ANALYSIS
The applicant requests a Certificate of Design Compliance for exterior alterations to the ca. 1930 Low
Priority historic structure, located at 202 South Austin Avenue. The property was recently acquired by
the applicant, who wishes to complete preventative maintenance and repaint the structure. The
proposed repainting project creates a color scheme coordinating the façade elements and enhancing the
individual architectural features of the structure, in compliance with Design Guidelines 11.1 and 11.2.
The proposed base color is a muted tone, as required by Design Guideline 11.3, while the accent color is
a brighter color to highlight the individual elements and direct customers toward the entrance of the
structure, in compliance with Design Guideline 11.5. Wooden elements are susceptible to weather
induced rot and other problems, so painting of the wooden structure is appropriate, as outlined in
Design Guideline 11.7.
CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL
In accordance with Section 3.13.030 of the Unified Development Code, the HARC must consider the
following criteria:
SECTION 3.13.030 CRITERIA FINDINGS
A. The application is complete and the information
contained within the application is correct and
sufficient enough to allow adequate review and
final action;
The application was submitted on
September 22, 2014 and deemed complete by
staff on October 2, 2014.
B. Compliance with any design standards of the
Unified Development Code;
Not applicable – the design standards of the
Unified Development Code do not address
paint color.
C. Compliance with the adopted Downtown Design
Guidelines, as may be amended from time to time,
specific to the applicable Historic or Overlay
District;
The proposed paint project is in compliance
with Chapter 11 of the Downtown and Old
Town Design Guidelines.
D. The integrity of an individual historic structure is
preserved.
The proposed paint project does not have an
adverse effect on the integrity of the
structure. Paint is not a permanent change
and can be altered in the future.
E. New buildings or additions are designed to be
compatible with surrounding historic properties.
No new buildings or additions to existing
buildings are included with the proposed
project.
F. The overall character of the Historic or applicable
Overlay District is protected.
The proposed project does not have an
adverse effect upon the character of the
Downtown Overlay District.
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-038 202 South Austin Avenue Page 3 of 4
SECTION 3.13.030 CRITERIA FINDINGS
G. Signs that are out of keeping with the adopted
design standards, and are not in character with
the site or landmarks within the Historic or
applicable Overlay District in question will not be
permitted.
No new signage is proposed for this project.
Any future tenant changes will require a
separate application for business signage.
H. The following may also be considered by the
HARC when determining whether to approve a
Certificate for Design Compliance:
1. The effect of the proposed change upon the
general historic, cultural, and architectural
nature of the site, landmark, or District.
2. The appropriateness of exterior architectural
features, including parking and loading
spaces, which can be seen from a public street,
alley, or walkway.
3. The general design, arrangement, texture,
material, and color of the building or structure
and the relation of such factors to similar
features of buildings or structures in the
District, contrast or other relation of such
factors to other landmarks built at or during
the same period, as well as the uniqueness of
such features, considering the remaining
examples of architectural, historical, and
cultural values.
The proposed project does not have an
adverse effect on the overall character of the
Downtown Overlay District. No additional
site changes are proposed by the applicant,
and the repainting of the existing structure is
in character with the surrounding buildings.
The wooden siding is an important
architectural element of this structure and
failure to protect the materials will result in
loss of historic integrity. The proposed
project preserves the historic integrity of the
structure and protects the architectural
materials by properly maintaining them and
protecting the materials from deterioration
caused by environmental factors.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Based on the findings listed above, staff recommends approval of the proposed project at 202 South
Austin Avenue.
As of the date of this report, staff has received no written comments regarding this request.
ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1 – Letter of Intent
Exhibit 2 – Photo with paint details
Exhibit 3 – Paint Samples (on file with the Planning Department)
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-038 202 South Austin Avenue Page 4 of 4
SUBMITTED BY
Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for
infill construction for the property located at 913 Walnut Street bearing the legal description of
Dimmit Addition, Block 90 (PT), 0.1652 acres
ITEM SUMMARY:
The City of Georgetown is in receipt of a request for a CDC for infill construction for an accessory
building in the Old Town Overlay District. According to the submitted letter of intent, the
applicant seeks an exception to the setback requirements for the Residential Single Family (RS)
zoning district.
Staff recommends approval of the request based on the findings that the request meets the
approval criteria of Section 3.13.030 of the Unified Development Code (UDC), as outlined in the
attached Staff Report.
The affirmative vote of the majority of the HARC members is required to approve the CDC
request.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The applicant paid the required fees.
SUBMITTED BY:
Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
CDC-2014-039 Staff Report Backup Material
CDC-2014-039 Exhibit 1 Backup Material
CDC-2014-039 Exhibit 2 Backup Material
CDC-2014-039 Exhibit 3 Backup Material
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-039 913 Walnut Street Page 1 of 5
Meeting Date: October 23, 2014 Agenda Item: D
File Number: CDC-2014-039
AGENDA ITEM DESCRIPTION
Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for infill
construction for the property located at 913 Walnut Street bearing the legal description of Dimmit
Addition, Block 90 (PT), 0.1652 acres
AGENDA ITEM DETAILS
Project Name: 913 Walnut Street Accessory Building Project
Applicant: John Lawton, Green Earth Builders
Property Owner: James Bray
Property Address: 913 South Walnut Street
Legal Description: Dimmit Addition, Block 90 (PT), 0.1652 acres
Historic Overlay: Old Town Overlay District
Case History: This is the first public hearing for this CDC application. Previous applications for
this project include a request for the reduction of the 365 day moratorium for
unauthorized demolition and a request to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for a
setback modification.
HISTORIC CONTEXT
Date of construction: 1920
Historic Resources Survey Level of Priority: Medium Priority
National Register Designation: None
Texas Historical Commission Designation: None
APPLICANT’S REQUEST
The applicant is requesting a Certificate of Design Compliance for the construction of an accessory
building. The proposed project is located within the required Residential Single Family (RS) zoning
districts and is requesting HARC approval to locate the structure within the setback.
APPLICABLE DESIGN GUIDELINES
The following guidelines are applicable to the proposed scope of work in accordance with the adopted
Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines:
GUIDELINES FINDINGS
The Design Guidelines are not applicable to this request. Not applicable
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-039 913 Walnut Street Page 2 of 5
STAFF ANALYSIS
On March 27, 2014 the applicant met with city staff to discuss the proposed project at 913 South Walnut
Street. The applicant indicated at the meeting and on the Pre Application Meeting Request that the
existing accessory structures would be remodeled to create the new structure. The project included the
expansion of the current accessory buildings to build out the garage and add a second story playroom.
The applicant was notified that the current buildings were located within the setback and any
demolition required and approved Certificate of Design Compliance. After determining that no
demolition would be involved in the project, the applicant was granted approval to submit the
required building permit applications.
An application for a building permit for the proposed project at 913 South Walnut Street was filed with
the City of Georgetown on May 22, 2014. The permit was approved on June 2, 2014, with the stipulation
that the applicant verify the project requirements with the Historic Planner, since the property is
located within the Old Town Overlay District. On June 30, 2014, the applicant attended a second Pre
Application Meeting with the Historic Planner and the Residential Plans Examiner to discuss the
project, confirming that no demolition would occur.
The applicant proceeded with construction following the approval of all permits and requested a pre-
pour foundation inspection. On July 17, 2014, the Building Inspector arrived to inspect the foundation
base and found that the two accessory buildings were removed from the site. The Residential Plans
Examiner issued a Stop Work Order for the property, halting all work until the appropriate permits
were issued.
The demolition of the two accessory structures resulted in the loss of the legal non-conforming status,
requiring any new construction to meet the current requirements of the Residential Single Family (RS)
zoning district. Per Unified Development Code (UDC) Section 6.03.050.A, Residential Single-Family
District Lot and Dimensional Standards, the rear setback shall be a minimum of 10 feet and the side
setback shall be a minimum of 20 feet for properties taking driveway access from a side street. The
proposed construction and new foundation is located within both the side and the rear setbacks.
Per UDC Section 3.13.010 D (3), the demolition or removal of a structure without CDC approval results
in a 365 day delay on HARC review and all building permits. A property owner or applicant may
request a reduction from the HARC based upon the criteria in the UDC. The applicant appeared before
the HARC on August 28, 2014, at which time the 365 day permit delay was reduced to 45 days,
expiring on August 31, 2014.
The applicant proposes to construct a 677 square foot accessory structure, replacing a previous
structure. The proposed two story accessory structure includes a 432 square foot garage on the first
floor, with a 245 square foot play room on the second floor. The property is used as a residence and
currently includes only the main dwelling.
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-039 913 Walnut Street Page 3 of 5
Per UDC Section 4.09.020 .B.1, a Certificate of Design Compliance is required for “Construction of
Single-family or Two-family Residential structure or addition that exceeds the limitations of Section
4.09.030.B.
The applicant wishes to construct the structure within the setback, requiring a CDC to exceed Section
4.09.030.B.2: “Upper stories of single-family and Two-family structures within the Old Town Overlay
District are subject to a 10 foot side setback and a 15 foot rear setback. However, HARC may approve a
CDC, in accordance with the adopted Design Guidelines, to allow the utilization of the setback
requirements for the underlying zoning district.”
HARC may allow the reduction in the setback requirements based upon the criteria established in the
UDC. The proposed structure replaces a previous structure demolished within the last year. Allowing
the property owner to build to the required setbacks for the underlying RS zoning district will not have
an adverse effect on surrounding properties and allows the applicant to utilize their property.
The proposed project requires approval by the Historic and Architectural Review Commission and the
Zoning Board of Adjustment prior to initiating construction. Exhibit 4 includes comment letters
received by property owners within a 200 foot radius of the subject property. The letters relate to the
ZBA case (SE-2014-001), but provide supporting information for the CDC application.
CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL
In accordance with Section 3.13.030 of the Unified Development Code, the HARC must consider the
following criteria:
SECTION 3.13.030 CRITERIA FINDINGS
A. The application is complete and the information
contained within the application is correct and
sufficient enough to allow adequate review and
final action;
The application was submitted on
September 29, 2014 and deemed complete by
staff on October 2, 2014.
B. Compliance with any design standards of the
Unified Development Code;
The proposed project complies with the
design standards of the underlying RS
zoning district. The applicant is seeking an
exception to the design standards outlined
in UDC Section 4.09.
C. Compliance with the adopted Downtown Design
Guidelines, as may be amended from time to time,
specific to the applicable Historic or Overlay
District;
The Downtown and Old Town Design
Guidelines do not address the appropriate
siting for accessory structures.
D. The integrity of an individual historic structure is
preserved.
The proposed infill construction project does
not have an adverse effect on the primary
historic structure.
E. New buildings or additions are designed to be The proposed project is compatible with the
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-039 913 Walnut Street Page 4 of 5
SECTION 3.13.030 CRITERIA FINDINGS
compatible with surrounding historic properties. surrounding historic properties. 10 of the 12
properties located within a 200 foot radius
have accessory structures located within the
setbacks.
F. The overall character of the Historic or applicable
Overlay District is protected.
The proposed project has a limited effect on
the Old Town Overlay District. Accessory
structures located within the current
setbacks are common in the Old Town
Overlay District and are indicative of
historic growth trends in the District.
G. Signs that are out of keeping with the adopted
design standards, and are not in character with
the site or landmarks within the Historic or
applicable Overlay District in question will not be
permitted.
The proposed project does not include any
signage.
H. The following may also be considered by the
HARC when determining whether to approve a
Certificate for Design Compliance:
1. The effect of the proposed change upon the
general historic, cultural, and architectural
nature of the site, landmark, or District.
2. The appropriateness of exterior architectural
features, including parking and loading
spaces, which can be seen from a public street,
alley, or walkway.
3. The general design, arrangement, texture,
material, and color of the building or structure
and the relation of such factors to similar
features of buildings or structures in the
District, contrast or other relation of such
factors to other landmarks built at or during
the same period, as well as the uniqueness of
such features, considering the remaining
examples of architectural, historical, and
cultural values.
The proposed project has limited impact
upon the overall character of the Old Town
Overlay District. Single and two story
accessory structures located at or near the
property line are common throughout the
district, and within the blocks surrounding
this project. Additionally, a two story
accessory structure occupied the site until
July, so the replacement of the previous
structure has limited impact. If approved,
the project will not diminish the overall
character or context of the district.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Based on the findings listed above, staff recommends approval of CDC-2014-029 as presented.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-039 913 Walnut Street Page 5 of 5
As of the date of this report, staff has received one written comment in support of this application. The
letter of support is from the adjacent property owner.
ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1 – Letter of Intent, Plans and Specifications
Exhibit 2 – 906 Pine Street Letter of Support
Exhibit 3 – Zoning Board of Adjustment Letters of Support
SUBMITTED BY
Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner
My name is John Lawton, new owner of Green Earth Builders LLC. I have operated in
Georgetown and surrounding area for over thirty five years. when I started the project at 9L3 walnut I
found that the entire shed had rotted into the ground at least 6inches. There was no bottom ptate and
the studs were rotted and termite damaged up another 5 Inches. Taking the structure down was a slow
process for safety reasons' I had the wall up by itself. lthen proceeded to take the tin off with
understanding that the rust and holes in the tin were a produce that needed to be extracted and did so.
The carport only had three 2" X 4"s running to 4'X 4" post which I had to extract because of setback
from 9 % st' when I took the tin off of the shed it had mold and water damage as well as termite
damage across 80 percent of the siding. The siding had a paper like quality and all nails were exposed.
There was about L6" of space between our shed and the neighbors shed which had a rack for storing
wood built on the overhand of the shed. My guys were brushing against the wall with rusty nails so, I
dropped the wall for safety' we took the siding off and put the wail back but started thinking about my
foundation guys and they wouldn't have room to work. Nor would they be able to trench out my special
depth footing needed forthis area. lslid the walloverto pourthe slab. Looking back in hind sight lknow
I should have contacted Jeff or Matt from taking the tin off to moving the wall. I have taken over a
company which is something I have been working towards my whole life. I have been overwhelmed with
the business side of a company that when I came to dealing with the city for permits and the entire
process I blanked' I am a carpenter out right and learning the best I can on the business part, growing
each day' I hired my daughter to help with the process and making it possible for me to move forward
for work' I have never made any bad decisions in my 35 years and to make the mistake like I did is very
outofcharacterforme' lhaveanA+gradeforqualityofworksecondtonone. lhavealwaysgivenmy
client above standard structural materials. I upgrade on all member and over engineer all footings and
piers' My clients know me to be honest and fair. I come to you today with the hope that you understand
that I meant only the best product for my client and the safety of my crew. I made the worst decisions of
my life consecutively' I promise I learned from my mistake and I hope that you would have the leniency
not to punish the home owner for my mistakes. My whole life I have always made decisions dealing with
any type of trouble shooting. I am learning to change throughout this process. I pran to be working in
the Georgetown area for ten rnore years if god willing. t have three jobs in old town in the works as of
today' I never meant for this to happen and for me to be negligent in my actions. This is not me or my
work ethic' I pray that you can have the compassion and let me proceed with the project.
Thank you for your time,
John LaMon
th'
l3'
SeolD F16oC,
5:ro€lA€
l{Ev cox5TaucTrc>q
EAsr 6111-1_
v$
(-tr
-rb Ba reKr* \
,o.tlc o" serg*;
FRom Sreie;
exntrrue
Gr**<eE'
+:'rbeAq€
BsrqlAlt_
a-fg:w-
,.i.1
e 11.
lb"O,a,
Fdn t^rsub.|,*l
/2'' r)e1u uJ A '. 1
d' 3toD s
d,
La hrAvn
K\3 \stSA"
c4T L t+"
lraiit {t i!:-'
s
.l
li;,s.Li\ .tr:r + rr( ]?
lf$€i$I sl,.]s iliN F$t.tb*Il
Jegd{ nii* *}_-f
Yi !:'!1/t'
{
js\
-rd
l\"
'ii,
.:
!"i
{i .r-
=aot
t'
ci
Xo
io
S
6\
r
(\
I
\o€t+
r
,qF.
t:(oQi
(Dlt
:
o-o
l
.\
,ql
o,
F
orox:
.
g'
r
g
12
"
8'
r
g
a3\
l
rorr
)
ii
f
'E
'
I;s&
*
't
?
.t
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for
infill construction, exterior alterations and signage for the property located at 202South College
Street, bearing the legal description of Lots 15-20, College Place, Cabinet 1, Slide 134
ITEM SUMMARY:
The City of Georgetown is in receipt of a request for a CDC for infill construction, exterior
alterations, and signage at 202 South College Street. According to the submitted letter of intent,
the applicant wishes to construct Phase 3 of College Place.
Staff recommends approval of the request based on the findings that the requests meet the
approval criteria of Section 3.13.030 of the Unified Development Code (UDC), as outlined in the
attached Staff Report.
The affirmative vote of the majority of the HARC members is required to approve the CDC
request.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The applicant paid the required fees.
SUBMITTED BY:
Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
CDC-2014-040 Staff Report Backup Material
CDC-2014-040 Exhibit 1 Backup Material
CDC-2014-040 Exhibit 2 Backup Material
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-040 202 South College Street Page 1 of 5
Meeting Date: October 23, 2014 Agenda Item: E
File Number: CDC-2014-040
AGENDA ITEM DESCRIPTION
Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for infill
construction, exterior alterations and signage for the property located at 202South College Street,
bearing the legal description of Lots 15-20, College Place, Cabinet 1, Slide 134
AGENDA ITEM DETAILS
Project Name: College Place Apartments Phase 3
Applicant: Dale and Carl Illig
Property Owner: Dale Illig
Property Address: 202 South College Street
Legal Description: Lots 15-20, College Place, Cabinet 1, Slide 134
Historic Overlay: Old Town Overlay District
Case History: The project was presented for conceptual review at the September 25, 2014
HARC meeting. This is the first public hearing for the application.
HISTORIC CONTEXT
Date of construction: NA
Historic Resources Survey Level of Priority: NA
National Register Designation: NA
Texas Historical Commission Designation: NA
APPLICANT’S REQUEST
The applicant is requesting a Certificate of Design Compliance for infill construction, exterior
alterations and signage at 202 South College Street. The infill construction will complete the build out
for the College Place Apartments. Additionally, the applicant wishes to repaint the existing structures
to coordinate all three buildings.
The request also includes one flush mounted sign, mounted on the east wall of the new structure, as
detailed below:
Sign Type Flush mounted
Size 40 sq feet
Materials Vinyl printed on MDO
Location Mounted on the east facing façade
(College Street) of the new structure
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-040 202 South College Street Page 2 of 5
The HARC CDC Review includes the following items:
o Exterior alterations to the existing structures
o Infill construction for Phase 3
o Exterior signage for the project
The site plan is included to provide additional information but is not subject to HARC review. The site
plan and relevant features will be reviewed by Planning Department staff for compliance with the
Unified Development Code.
APPLICABLE DESIGN GUIDELINES
The following guidelines are applicable to the proposed scope of work in accordance with the adopted
Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines:
GUIDELINES FINDINGS
9.6 A flush-mounted wall sign may be considered. Complies
14.3 Consider dividing a larger non-residential
building into “modules” that are similar in scale to
buildings seen traditionally.
Complies
14.4 Building heights of larger projects should
provide variety.
Complies
14.5 Large project sites should be developed with
several buildings, rather than a single structure.
Complies
14.6 Where a large building is needed, divide the
building into modules that reflect the traditional size
of residential buildings.
Complies
14.8 Masonry materials that convey a sense of scale
are preferred for new non-residential buildings.
Complies
STAFF ANALYSIS
The proposed project at 202 South College Street is located on the northeast edge of the Old Town
Overlay District, at the intersection of College and 2nd Streets, and is Phase 3 of a project originally
started in 1987, with the construction of the units along the north side of the property. After acquiring
the property in 1993, the current owner proceeded with Phase 2, the construction of the units along the
south side of the property. The property owner wishes to complete the build out with Phase 3. The
final phase will add 6 units adjacent to the existing units along the south side of the property. In
addition, the property owner wishes to repaint the existing structures add additional landscaping
elements to the site. Phases 1 and 2 were completed prior to the adoption of the Old Town Overlay
district, so previous phases did not require a Certificate of Design Compliance.
Per UDC Section 4.09.020 D “Subject to review by HARC for design compliance, all uses permitted or
conditionally permitted in the underlying Districts shall continue to be permitted or conditionally
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-040 202 South College Street Page 3 of 5
permitted, respectively. HARC shall not have the authority to approve the specific use of a site.” The
site plan and construction plan review is running concurrently with the CDC review. The site design
features will be addressed through the site plan review, with the CDC focusing on the exterior
alterations and the design details of the new construction.
Phase 3 of the College Place Apartments includes the construction of 6 units, designed to match the
existing structures. The new construction brings the east facing building wall closer to College Street,
impacting the street edge of the site. Therefore, the design of the new structure adheres to the following
policy stated in Chapter 14 of the Design Guidelines, “The overall mass of a new building or addition
should convey a sense of human scale.” The Design Guidelines listed under the policy identify several
specific design characteristics to comply with the policy. Design Guideline 14.3 recommends dividing
larger building in to smaller units, designed to emulate the mass and scale of the surrounding
structures. The north facing façade of the six units utilizes a mix of materials and color to accentuate the
separation of the structures, creating the appearance of multiple buildings in scale with the
surrounding development. The eastern wall was originally proposed to be all brick, but the applicant
agreed to replace the 2nd story brick with siding, braking up the wall and providing for a pedestrian
scale.
Design Guidelines 14.5 and 14.6 also stress the need for larger buildings to be broken up in to smaller
units, to blend with the mass and scale of the surrounding buildings, while Design Guideline 14.8
states that masonry materials are appropriate for infill projects to help convey the human scale of the
project. The use of different materials, changes to the roofline and different paint accomplishes the
design goals set forth by Chapter 14 of the Design Guidelines.
The proposed sign is of simple design and identifies the residential complex. The size and colors of the
proposed sign comply with the Design Guidelines and is appropriate for the project.
CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL
In accordance with Section 3.13.030 of the Unified Development Code, the HARC must consider the
following criteria:
SECTION 3.13.030 CRITERIA FINDINGS
A. The application is complete and the information
contained within the application is correct and
sufficient enough to allow adequate review and
final action;
The application was submitted and deemed
complete on September 30, 2014, following
HARC Conceptual Review at the September
25, 2014 Regular HARC meeting.
B. Compliance with any design standards of the
Unified Development Code;
The project complies with the design
standards of the UDC and site design review
will be completed following the CDC
review.
C. Compliance with the adopted Downtown Design
Guidelines, as may be amended from time to time,
The project complies with Chapter 9 and
Chapter 14 of the Design Guidelines, as
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-040 202 South College Street Page 4 of 5
SECTION 3.13.030 CRITERIA FINDINGS
specific to the applicable Historic or Overlay
District;
detailed above.
D. The integrity of an individual historic structure is
preserved.
This project does not involve any existing
historic resources.
E. New buildings or additions are designed to be
compatible with surrounding historic properties.
The new construction is designed to be
compatible in shape, mass, site layout and
materials with the surrounding structures
and historic properties.
F. The overall character of the Historic or applicable
Overlay District is protected.
The proposed project protects the overall
character of the Old Town Overlay district
by utilizing the identified methods for
dividing larger buildings in to smaller visual
units.
G. Signs that are out of keeping with the adopted
design standards, and are not in character with
the site or landmarks within the Historic or
applicable Overlay District in question will not be
permitted.
The proposed sign complies with the Design
Guidelines and is in character with those of
the historic overlay districts.
H. The following may also be considered by the
HARC when determining whether to approve a
Certificate for Design Compliance:
1. The effect of the proposed change upon the
general historic, cultural, and architectural
nature of the site, landmark, or District.
2. The appropriateness of exterior architectural
features, including parking and loading
spaces, which can be seen from a public street,
alley, or walkway.
3. The general design, arrangement, texture,
material, and color of the building or structure
and the relation of such factors to similar
features of buildings or structures in the
District, contrast or other relation of such
factors to other landmarks built at or during
the same period, as well as the uniqueness of
such features, considering the remaining
examples of architectural, historical, and
cultural values.
The proposed project has limited effect on
the surrounding historic district and mimics
the previous phases on the site. The
materials, scale and massing are appropriate
for the district, and the single sign is
unobtrusive, allowing the property owner to
provide signage with a limited impact on
the surrounding district.
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-040 202 South College Street Page 5 of 5
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Based on the findings listed above, staff recommends approval of CDC-2014-040 as presented.
As of the date of this report, staff has received no public comments regarding this request.
ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1 – Letter of Intent
Exhibit 2 – Plans and Specifications
SUBMITTED BY
Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner
PUBLIC COMMENTS
&ROOHJH3ODFH
+$5&5HYLHZ
By: Illig Ltd.
Created: September 30, 2014
&RQWHQWV
3URSRVHG1RUWK(OHYDWLRQ
7KLVGLDJUDPVKRZVWKHQHZSURSRVHGXQLWVDQGWKHEULFNFKRLFHVWKDWKDYHEHHQVHOHFWHGIRUHDFKXQLW7KHDFWXDOEULFN
VHOHFWLRQVFDQEHIRXQGRQRXUGHVLJQERDUGV
5HQGHUHG3KRWRJUDSKRI([LVWLQJ%XLOGLQJV
7KLVUHQGHUHGSKRWRJUDSKVKRZVWKHVLGLQJWULPDQGGRRUFRORUVWKDWDUHEHLQJSURSRVHG7KHVLGLQJFRORUDQGWULPZLOO
EHXVHGRQWKHH[LVWLQJDQGQHZEXLOGLQJV&RORUVZDWFKHVDQGLQIRUPDWLRQFDQEHIRXQGRQRXUGHVLJQERDUGV
(DVW:DOO&RQFHSW5HQGHULQJ
7KLVUHQGHULQJVKRZVZKDWWKHHDVWZDOORIWKHQHZXQLWVZLOOORRNOLNH7KHORZHUSRUWLRQZLOOEHWKHEULFNIURP8QLW
FDUULHGDURXQGWKHVLGHFHPHQWFRPSRVLWHERDUGZLOOEHXVHGRQWKHWRSSRUWLRQDQGZHZLOOKDYHDVLJQWKDWEUDQGVRXU
FRPPHUFLDOSURSHUW\7KHVLJQLQWKLVUHQGHULQJLVPHUHO\DSODFHKROGHU7KHUHLVDVHSDUDWHVLJQGHVLJQSDJHLQWKLVILOH
7KHZDWHUFROOHFWLRQEDUUHOVKRZQLVDUHSUHVHQWDWLRQRIKRZZHZRXOGOLNHWRLPSURYHWKHDSSHDUDQFHRIWKHWZR
UDLQZDWHUFROOHFWLRQWDQNV7KHH[DFWORFDWLRQRIWKHVHWDQNVFDQEHIRXQGRQRXUVLWHSODQ
6LJQ5HQGHULQJ
7KLVUHQGHULQJZDVSURYLGHGWRXVE\$IIRUGDEOH6LJQVRI*HRUJHWRZQ7KHDSSUR[LPDWHFRVWRIWKLVVLJQLV7KH
VLJQZLOOEHFRQVWUXFWHGRXWRIZRRGDQGKDYHDZKLWHEDFNJURXQGEODFNWH[WDQGDJUD\VKDGRZ7KLVHOHYDWLRQGRHVQRW
VKRZWKHEULFNGHVLJQHOHPHQWWKDWKDVEHHQSURSRVHGLQWKH(DVW:DOO&RQFHSW5HQGHULQJ
7UDVK(QFORVXUH'HWDLO
3URYLGHGDVDFRXUWHV\WKLVHQFORVXUHPHHWVWKHFXUUHQW8'&UHJXODWLRQV
&ROOHJH3ODFH6LWH3ODQ
7KLVSURYLGHGVLWHSODQKDVDOUHDG\KDGDILUVWUHYLHZDQGKDVEHHQUHVXEPLWWHGZLWKWKHDSSURSULDWHFKDQJHVIRUDVHFRQG
UHYLHZ
GEORGETOWN, TEXAS
COLLEGE PLACE TOWNHOME DEVELOPEMENT
DALE ILLIG
A TOWNHOME PROJECT FOR
AR
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
S
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
N
U
M
B
E
R
D
A
T
E
CO
P
Y
R
I
G
H
T
E
L
S
A
S
S
E
R
AR
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
U
R
A
L
,
I
N
C
.
AL
L
R
I
G
H
T
S
R
E
S
E
R
V
E
D
.
AL
L
D
E
S
I
G
N
S
A
N
D
DR
A
W
I
N
G
S
A
R
E
T
H
E
SO
L
E
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
O
F
EL
S
A
S
S
E
R
AR
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
U
R
A
L
,
I
N
C
.
AN
D
M
A
Y
N
O
T
B
E
AL
T
E
R
E
D
O
R
RE
P
R
O
D
U
C
E
D
I
N
A
N
Y
WA
Y
W
I
T
H
O
U
T
W
R
I
T
T
E
N
CO
N
S
E
N
T
.
CR
T TCE
SA
LS
RESI SAH
D
R
E
E
.
A
HC
S RI
R
D
9
9
9
S TIREG
L
T
A E 8
T
F
O
E
X
E
TA
NO. DESCRIPTION
PLAN REVISIONSDE
S
I
G
N
/
P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
U
R
E
EL
S
A
S
S
E
R
AR
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
U
R
A
L
IN
C
.
P.
O
.
B
O
X
8
3
3
GE
O
R
G
E
T
O
W
N
,
T
E
X
A
S
7
8
6
2
7
(5
1
2
)
9
3
0
-
5
3
5
3
,
(
5
1
2
)
9
3
0
-
2
6
1
8
F
A
X
WW
W
.
E
A
I
-
T
X
.
C
O
M
DATE
14
0
0
9
06
/
1
7
/
1
4
06
/
0
6
/
1
4
FO
R
R
E
V
I
E
W
O
N
L
Y
NO
T
F
O
R
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
OR
P
E
R
M
I
T
I
N
G
2'-0"
8'-1" 1'-4 3/4" 8'-1"
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
N
O
R
T
H
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
SC
A
L
E
:
1
/
4
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
12
10
10
12
10
12
1
2
10
(T
Y
P
I
C
A
L
)
CO
M
P
.
S
H
I
N
G
L
E
R
O
O
F
O
N
30
#
F
E
L
T
U
N
D
E
R
L
A
Y
M
E
N
T
MT
'
L
RO
O
F
MT
'
L
RO
O
F
CO
M
P
.
S
H
I
N
G
L
E
S
BR
I
C
K
V
E
N
E
E
R
(T
Y
P
I
C
A
L
)
BR
I
C
K
V
E
N
E
E
R
BR
I
C
K
V
E
N
E
E
R
CE
M
E
N
T
F
I
B
E
R
S
I
D
I
N
G
8
12
(T
Y
P
I
C
A
L
)
24
"
L
O
U
V
.
VE
N
T
BR
I
C
K
V
E
N
E
E
R
10
12
MT
'
L
RO
O
F
(T
Y
P
I
C
A
L
)
BR
I
C
K
V
E
N
E
E
R
12
10
BR
I
C
K
V
E
N
E
E
R
EX
I
S
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
CE
M
E
N
T
F
I
B
E
R
S
I
D
I
N
G
C
E
M
E
N
T
F
I
B
E
R
S
I
D
I
N
G
CE
M
E
N
T
F
I
B
E
R
S
I
D
I
N
G
2'-0"
8'-1"1'-4 3/4"8'-1"
2'-0"
8'-1" 1'-4 3/4" 8'-1"
8'-1"1'-4 3/4"8'-1"
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
N
O
R
T
H
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
SC
A
L
E
:
1
/
4
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
12
10
10
12
10
12
1
2
10
(T
Y
P
I
C
A
L
)
CO
M
P
.
S
H
I
N
G
L
E
R
O
O
F
O
N
30
#
F
E
L
T
U
N
D
E
R
L
A
Y
M
E
N
T
MT
'
L
RO
O
F
MT
'
L
RO
O
F
CO
M
P
.
S
H
I
N
G
L
E
S
BR
I
C
K
V
E
N
E
E
R
(T
Y
P
I
C
A
L
)
BR
I
C
K
V
E
N
E
E
R
BR
I
C
K
V
E
N
E
E
R
CE
M
E
N
T
F
I
B
E
R
S
I
D
I
N
G
8
12
(T
Y
P
I
C
A
L
)
24
"
L
O
U
V
.
VE
N
T
BR
I
C
K
V
E
N
E
E
R
10
12
MT
'
L
RO
O
F
(T
Y
P
I
C
A
L
)
BR
I
C
K
V
E
N
E
E
R
8
12
8
12
12
10
10
12
10
12
1
2
10
12
10
BR
I
C
K
V
E
N
E
E
R
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
N
O
R
T
H
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
SC
A
L
E
:
1
/
4
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
CE
M
E
N
T
F
I
B
E
R
S
I
D
I
N
G
8
12
RO
O
F
L
O
U
V
E
R
S
CO
M
P
.
S
H
I
N
G
L
E
R
O
O
F
O
N
30
#
F
E
L
T
U
N
D
E
R
L
A
Y
M
E
N
T
(T
Y
P
I
C
A
L
)
CE
M
E
N
T
F
I
B
E
R
TR
I
M
(T
Y
P
.
)
CE
M
E
N
T
F
I
B
E
R
TR
I
M
(T
Y
P
.
)
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
S
O
U
T
H
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
SC
A
L
E
:
1
/
4
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
S
O
U
T
H
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
SC
A
L
E
:
1
/
4
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
SC
A
L
E
:
1
/
4
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
WE
S
T
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
SID
I
N
G
CE
M
E
N
T
F
I
B
E
R
S
I
D
I
N
G
(T
Y
P
I
C
A
L
)
12
8
LO
U
V
E
R
E
D
V
E
N
T
W
/
IN
S
E
C
T
S
C
R
E
E
N
8
12
12
8
EA
S
T
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
SC
A
L
E
:
1
/
4
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
8
12
IN
S
E
C
T
S
C
R
E
E
N
LO
U
V
E
R
E
D
V
E
N
T
W
/
SI
D
I
N
G
BR
I
C
K
VE
N
E
E
R
CE
M
E
N
T
F
I
B
E
R
S
I
D
I
N
G
CE
M
E
N
T
F
I
B
E
R
S
I
D
I
N
G
CE
M
E
N
T
F
I
B
E
R
S
I
D
I
N
G
CE
M
E
N
T
F
I
B
E
R
S
I
D
I
N
G
CO
M
P
.
S
H
I
N
G
L
E
R
O
O
F
O
N
30
#
F
E
L
T
U
N
D
E
R
L
A
Y
M
E
N
T
(T
Y
P
I
C
A
L
)
CO
M
P
.
S
H
I
N
G
L
E
R
O
O
F
O
N
30
#
F
E
L
T
U
N
D
E
R
L
A
Y
M
E
N
T
(T
Y
P
I
C
A
L
)
A3
.
0
SC
A
L
E
1
/
8
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
SC
A
L
E
1
/
8
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
SC
A
L
E
1
/
8
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
SC
A
L
E
1
/
8
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
8o
f
8
SP
-
2
0
1
4
-
0
1
1
Th
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
a
r
e
t
h
e
s
o
l
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
o
f
S
T
E
G
E
R
&
B
I
Z
Z
E
L
L
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
,
I
N
C
.
T
h
e
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
i
s
h
e
r
e
b
y
r
e
s
t
r
i
c
t
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
o
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
s
i
t
e
f
o
r
w
h
i
c
h
t
h
e
y
w
e
r
e
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
.
R
e
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
r
r
e
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
i
n
w
h
o
l
e
o
r
i
n
p
a
r
t
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
w
r
i
t
t
e
n
p
e
r
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
o
f
S
T
E
G
E
R
&
B
I
Z
Z
E
L
L
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
,
I
N
C
.
i
s
s
t
r
i
c
t
l
y
p
r
o
h
i
b
i
t
e
d
.
NO.DATEREVISIONBY
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
DATE
DATE
DATE
DATE for
COLLEGE PLACE
Georgetown
Williamson County, Texas
P\22000-22999
22236 ILLIG TOWNHOMES
P\22000-22999
Xref DWG FILE.
Sheet Number:
Drawing Path:
SCALE:
Project Number:
Project Name:
Project Path:
22236
AS NOTED23-Sep-14
GEORGETOWN, TX 78626
STEGERBIZZELL.COM
>>ENGINEERS >>PLANNERS >>SURVEYORS
512.930.9412
SERVICES
METRO
ADDRESS
1978 S. AUSTIN AVENUE
WEB
JMC
23-Sep-14GAD, JMC
09-24-2014
22236 ILLIG TOWNHOMES23-Sep-14JMC
23-Sep-14JMC
SP-2014-011
TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-181
TBPLS FIRM No.10003700
1.165 Acres
No. 48491C0295E dated September 26, 2008.
No 100 year floodplain per F.E.M.A. Flood Insurance Rate Map
SITE AREA:
FLOODPLAIN:
PARKING:
EXIST. IMPERVIOUS COVER: 16,842 S.F. (0.387 Ac.)
30 Existing Parking Spaces
0.387 Ac. / 1.165 Ac. * 100 = 33%
PROP. IMPERVIOUS COVER: 3,521 S.F. (0.08 Ac.)
STORMWATER:The Stormwater requirements are met by this Site Plan
SITE PLAN NOTES:
1.All lighting fixtures shall be designed to completely conceal, fully shield within
opaque housing the light source from visibility from any street right-of-way. The
cone of light shall not cross any adjacent property line. The illumination shall
not exceed two (2) foot candles at a height of three (3) feet at the property line.
Only incandescent, fluorescent, color-corrected high-pressure sodium or metal
halide may be used. All vehicle or pedestrian access shall be sufficiently
lighted to ensure security of property and persons.
2.All roof, wall and ground mounted mechanical equipment must be screened in
accordance with Section 8 of the UDC. If roof and wall mounted equipment of
any type including duct work and large vents is proposed, it shall be shown on
the site plan and screening identified. Screening of mechanical equipment shall
result in the mechanical equipment blending in with the primary building and
not appearing separate from the building and shall be screened from view from
any rights-of-way or adjoining properties.
3.The dumpster enclosures must be one (1) foot above the height of the waste
container. Use protective poles in corners and at impact areas. Fence posts
shall be of rust protected metal or concrete. A minimum 6" slab is required and
must be sloped to drain. The enclosure must have steel framed gates with
spring loaded hinges and fasteners to keep closed. Screening must be on all
four (4) sides by masonry wall or approved fence or screening with opaque
gates.
SITE PLAN
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS COVER: 20,363 S.F. (0.47 Ac.)
0.47 Ac. / 1.165 Ac. * 100 =40%
SCALE: 1" = 20'
ALLOWED IMPERVIOUS COVER:40% maximum (Per 1987 Site plan)
0.18 of an acreLIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION AREA:
No new Parking Spaces proposed
1.9 Parking Spaces per unit
Th
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
a
r
e
t
h
e
s
o
l
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
o
f
S
T
E
G
E
R
&
B
I
Z
Z
E
L
L
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
,
I
N
C
.
T
h
e
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
i
s
h
e
r
e
b
y
r
e
s
t
r
i
c
t
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
o
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
s
i
t
e
f
o
r
w
h
i
c
h
t
h
e
y
w
e
r
e
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
.
R
e
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
r
r
e
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
i
n
w
h
o
l
e
o
r
i
n
p
a
r
t
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
w
r
i
t
t
e
n
p
e
r
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
o
f
S
T
E
G
E
R
&
B
I
Z
Z
E
L
L
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
,
I
N
C
.
i
s
s
t
r
i
c
t
l
y
p
r
o
h
i
b
i
t
e
d
.
NO.DATEREVISIONBY
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
DATE
DATE
DATE
DATE for
COLLEGE PLACE
Georgetown
Williamson County, Texas
P\22000-22999
22236 ILLIG TOWNHOMES
P\22000-22999
Xref DWG FILE.
Sheet Number:
Drawing Path:
SCALE:
Project Number:
Project Name:
Project Path:
22236
AS NOTED23-Sep-14
GEORGETOWN, TX 78626
STEGERBIZZELL.COM
>>ENGINEERS >>PLANNERS >>SURVEYORS
512.930.9412
SERVICES
METRO
ADDRESS
1978 S. AUSTIN AVENUE
WEB
JMC
23-Sep-14GAD, JMC
09-24-2014
22236 ILLIG TOWNHOMES23-Sep-14JMC
23-Sep-14JMC
SP-2014-011
TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-181
TBPLS FIRM No.10003700
1. Written construction notification must be given to the appropriate TCEQ regional office no later
than 48 hours prior to commencement of the regulated activity. Information must include the
date on which the regulated activity will commence, the name of the approved plan for the
regulated activity, and the name of the prime contractor and the name and telephone number
of the contact person.
2. All contractors conducting regulated activities associated with this project must be provided with
complete copies of the approved Water Pollution Abatement Plan and the TCEQ letter
indicating the specific conditions of its approval. During the course of these regulated activities,
the contractors are required to keep on-site copies of the approved plan and approval letter.
3. If any sensitive feature is discovered during construction, all regulated activities near the
sensitive feature must be suspended immediately. The appropriate TCEQ regional office must
be immediately notified of any sensitive features encountered during construction. The regulated
activities near the sensitive feature may not proceed until the TCEQ has reviewed and
approved the methods proposed to protect the sensitive feature and the Edwards Aquifer from
any potentially adverse impacts to water quality.
4. No temporary aboveground hydrocarbon and hazardous substance storage tank system is
installed within 150 feet of a domestic, industrial, irrigation, or public water supply well, or other
sensitive feature.
5. Prior to commencement of construction, all temporary erosion and sedimentation (E&S) control
measures must be properly selected, installed, and maintained in accordance with the
manufacturers specifications and good engineering practices. Controls specified in the
temporary storm water section of the approved Edwards Aquifer Protection Plan are required
during construction. If inspections indicate a control has been used inappropriately, or
incorrectly, the applicant must replace or modify the control for site situations. The controls must
remain in place until disturbed areas are revegetated and the areas have become permanently
stabilized.
6. If sediment escapes the construction site, off-site accumulations of sediment must be removed
at a frequency sufficient to minimize offsite impacts to water quality (e.g., fugitive sediment in
street being washed into surface streams or sensitive features by the next rain).
7. Sediment must be removed from sediment traps or sedimentation ponds not later than when
design capacity has been reduced by 50%. A permanent stake must be provided that can
indicate when the sediment occupies 50% of the basin volume.
8. Litter, construction debris, and construction chemicals exposed to stormwater shall be prevented
from becoming a pollutant source for stormwater discharges (e.g., screening outfalls, picked up
daily).
9. All spoils (excavated material) generated from the project site must be stored on-site with proper
E&S controls. For storage or disposal of spoils at another site on the Edwards Aquifer Recharge
Zone, the owner of the site must receive approval of a water pollution abatement plan for the
placement of fill material or mass grading prior to the placement of spoils at the other site.
10. Stabilization measures shall be initiated as soon as practicable in portions of the site where
construction activities have temporarily or permanently ceased, but in no case more than 14 days
after the construction activity in that portion of the site has temporarily or permanently ceased.
Where the initiation of stabilization measures by the 14th day after construction activity
temporary or permanently cease is precluded by weather conditions, stabilization measures shall
be initiated as soon as practicable. Where construction activity on a portion of the site is
temporarily ceased, and earth disturbing activities will be resumed within 21 days, temporary
stabilization measures do not have to be initiated on that portion of site. In areas experiencing
droughts where the initiation of stabilization measures by the 14th day after construction activity
has temporarily or permanently ceased is precluded by seasonal arid conditions, stabilization
measures shall be initiated as soon as practicable.
11. The following records shall be maintained and made available to the TCEQ upon request: the
dates when major grading activities occur; the dates when construction activities temporarily or
permanently cease on a portion of the site; and the dates when stabilization measures are
initiated.
12. The holder of any approved Edward Aquifer protection plan must notify the appropriate regional
office in writing and obtain approval from the executive director prior to initiating any of the
following:
A. any physical or operational modification of any water pollution abatement structure(s),
including but not limited to ponds, dams, berms, sewage treatment plants, and
diversionary structures;
B. any change in the nature or character of the regulated activity from that which was
originally approved or a change which would significantly impact the ability of the plan to
prevent pollution of the Edwards Aquifer;
C. any development of land previously identified as undeveloped in the original water
pollution abatement plan.
Austin Regional Office
2800 S. IH35, Suite 100
Austin, Texas 78704
Phone (512) 339-2929
Fax (512) 339-3795
1. The Contractor shall install erosion/sedimentation controls and tree
protective fencing prior to any site preparation work (clearing,
2. The placement of erosion/sedimentation controls shall be in accordance
3. Any significant variation in materials or locations of controls or
fences from those shown on the approved plans must be approved by the
4. The Contractor is required to inspect all controls and fences at weekly
intervals and after significant rainfall events to insure that they
are functioning properly. The person(s) responsible for maintenance
of controls and fences shall immediately make any necessary repairs to
damaged areas. Silt accumulation at controls must be removed when the
5. Prior to final acceptance, haul roads and waterway crossings constructed
for temporary Contractor access must be removed, accumulated sediment
removed from the waterway, and the area restored to the original grade
and revegetated. All land clearing debris shall be disposed of in
6. Field revisions to the EROSION & SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN & DETAILS
or field inspector with the Texas Commission
(TCEQ) during the course of construction to
Major revisions must be approved by the
approved spoil disposal sites.
(TCEQ).
TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL NOTES
grubbing or excavation).
with the EROSION & SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN & DETAILS
depth reaches six (6) inches.
City Engineer.
TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
WATER POLLUTION ABATEMENT PLAN
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES
required by the Engineer
on Environmental Quality
correct control inadequacies.
may be
CITY OF GEORGETOWN GENERAL NOTES
1.These construction plans were prepared, sealed, signed and dated by a Texas Licensed
3URIHVVLRQDO(QJLQHHU7KHUHIRUHEDVHGRQWKHHQJLQHHU¶VFRQFXUUHQFHRIFRPSOLDQFHWKH
construction plans for construction of the proposed project are hereby approved subject to the
standard Construction Specifications and Details Manual and all other applicable City, State and
Federal Requirements and Codes.
2.This project is subject to all City Standard Specifications and Details in effect at the time of submittal
of the project to the City.
3.The site construction plans shall meet all requirements of the approved site plan.
4.Wastewater mains and service lines shall be SDR 26 PVC.
5.Wastewater mains shall be installed without horizontal or vertical bends.
6.Maximum distance between wastewater manholes is 500 feet.
7.Wastewater mains shall be low pressure air tested and mandrel tested by the contractor according to
the City of Georgetown and TCEQ requirements.
8.Wastewater manholes shall be vacuum tested and coated by the contractor according to City of
Georgetown and TCEQ requirements.
9.Wastewater mains shall be camera tested by the contractor and submitted to the City on DVD format
prior to paving the streets.
10.Private water system fire lines shall be tested by the contractor to 200 psi for 2 hours.
11.Private water system fire lines shall be ductile iron piping from the water main to the building
sprinkler system, and 200 psi C900 PVC for all others.
12.Public water system mains shall be 150 psi C900 PVC and tested by the contractor at 150 psi for 2
hours.
13.All bends and changes in direction on water mains shall be restrained and thrust blocked.
14.Long fire hydrant leads shall be restrained.
15.All water lines are to be bacteria tested by the contractor according to the City standards and
specifications.
16.Water and Sewer main crossings shall meet all requirements of the TCEQ and the City.
17.Flexible base material for public streets shall be TXDOT Type A Grade 1.
18.Hot mix asphaltic concrete pavement shall be Type D unless otherwise specified and shall be a
minimum of 2 inches thick on public streets and roadways.
19.All sidewalk ramps are to be installed with the public infrastructure.
20.A maintenance bond is required to be submitted to the City prior to acceptance of the public
improvements. This bond shall be established for 1 year in the amount of 25% of the cost of the
public improvements and shall follow the City format.
21.Record drawings of the public improvements shall be submitted to the City by the design engineer
prior to acceptance of the project. These drawings shall be on mylar or on TIFF or PDF disk (300
dpi). If a disk is submitted, a bond set shall be included with the disk.
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES
1.Prior to beginning construction, the Owner or his authorized representative, shall
convene a Pre-Construction Conference between the City of Georgetown,
Engineer, Contractor, County Engineer (if applicable), Texas Commission on
Environmental Quality Field Office, and any other affected parties. Notify all such
parties at least 48 hours prior to the time of the conference and 48 hours prior to
beginning construction.
2.Any existing utilities, pavement, curbs, and/or sidewalks damaged or removed
shall be repaired by the Contractor at his expense before acceptance of the
project.
3.The location of any existing water, wastewater lines or other utilities shall be
verified by the City of Georgetown & other utility providers prior to construction.
4.Manhole frames, covers, water valve covers, etc., shall be raised to finished
pavement grade at the Contractor's expense by a qualified contractor with City
inspection. All utility adjustments shall be completed prior to final paving
construction.
5.Steger Bizzell has endeavored to design these plans compliant with ADA/TDLR
and other accessibility requirements. However, the contractor shall not be relieved
of any responsibility for constructing these improvements compliant with all
applicable accessibility standards. If the contractor notices any discrepancies
between these plans and accessibility laws/rules, he is to stop work in the area of
conflict and notify Steger Bizzell immediately for a resolution and/or revision to
these plans. Steger Bizzell shall not be held responsible for constructing this site
compliant with accessibility laws/rules regardless of what is shown in these plans.
PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL NOTES
1. All disturbed areas shall be restored as noted below:
a. A minimum of four inches of imported sandy loam topsoil or approved equal
shall be placed in all drainage channels (except rock) and on all cleared areas.
b. Grass areas may be sodded, plugged, sprigged or seeded except that solid
sod shall be used in swales or other areas subject to erosion.
The seeding for permanent erosion control shall be applied over areas disturbed by
construction as follows, unless specified elsewhere:
i. From September 15 to March 1, seeding shall be with a combination
of 1 pound per 1,000 square feet of unhulled Bermuda and 7 pounds per 1,000
square feet of Winter Rye with a purity of 95% with 90% germination.
ii. From March 2 to September 14, seeding shall be with hulled Bermuda
at a rate of 3 pounds per 1,000 square feet with a purity of 95% with 85%
germination.
c. Fertilizer shall be slow release granular or pelleted type and shall have an
analysis of 15-15-15 and shall be applied at the rate of 23 pounds per acre once at
the time of planting and again once during the time of establishment.
d. All planted areas shall be provided with a readily available water supply and
watered as necessary to ensure continuous healthy growth and development. The
planted area shall be irrigated or sprinkled in a manner that will not erode the top soil,
but will sufficiently soak the soil to a depth of six inches. The irrigation shall occur at
ten-day intervals during the first two months. Rainfall occurrences of 1/2 inch or
more shall postpone the watering schedule for one week.
e. Mulch type used shall be Mulch, applied at a rate of 1,500 pounds per acre.
1. Call all affected parties at least 48 hours prior to beginning any
construction to schedule a pre-construction conference and secure
2. Install temporary erosion controls prior to any clearing and grubbing.
Note: Other contractors could be working on this site. Coordinate all
all required permits.
Notify the City of Georgetown when installed.
SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION
activities with the activities of others.
GENERAL NOTES
Th
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
a
r
e
t
h
e
s
o
l
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
o
f
S
T
E
G
E
R
&
B
I
Z
Z
E
L
L
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
,
I
N
C
.
T
h
e
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
i
s
h
e
r
e
b
y
r
e
s
t
r
i
c
t
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
o
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
s
i
t
e
f
o
r
w
h
i
c
h
t
h
e
y
w
e
r
e
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
.
R
e
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
r
r
e
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
i
n
w
h
o
l
e
o
r
i
n
p
a
r
t
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
w
r
i
t
t
e
n
p
e
r
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
o
f
S
T
E
G
E
R
&
B
I
Z
Z
E
L
L
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
,
I
N
C
.
i
s
s
t
r
i
c
t
l
y
p
r
o
h
i
b
i
t
e
d
.
NO.DATEREVISIONBY
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
DATE
DATE
DATE
DATE for
COLLEGE PLACE
Georgetown
Williamson County, Texas
P\22000-22999
22236 ILLIG TOWNHOMES
P\22000-22999
Xref DWG FILE.
Sheet Number:
Drawing Path:
SCALE:
Project Number:
Project Name:
Project Path:
22236
AS NOTED24-Sep-14
GEORGETOWN, TX 78626
STEGERBIZZELL.COM
>>ENGINEERS >>PLANNERS >>SURVEYORS
512.930.9412
SERVICES
METRO
ADDRESS
1978 S. AUSTIN AVENUE
WEB
JMC
24-Sep-14GAD, JMC
09-24-2014
22236 ILLIG TOWNHOMES24-Sep-14JMC
24-Sep-14JMC
SP-2014-011
TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-181
TBPLS FIRM No.10003700
DRAINAGE PLAN
DEVELOPED CONDITIONS
1" = 30'
EXISTING CONDITIONS
1" = 30'
EXISTING DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS
DRAINAGE AREA A = 0.00163 SQ. MI.
= 1.04 ACRES
EXISTING CONDITIONS:
COMPOSITE OF PAVEMENT AND LAWN GOOD
HYDROLOGIC GROUP - D
Tlag = 0.10
PAVEMENT - RCN 98
LAWN, GOOD - RCN 80
0.387 AC. IMPERVIOUS COVER
0.387 ACRES / 1.165 AC = 33%
(33% * 98) + (67% * 80) = 86
RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER -86
2 YR RUNOFF = 3 CFS
10 YR RUNOFF = 5 CFS
25 YR RUNOFF = 6 CFS
100 YR RUNOFF = 8 CFS
DEVELOPED DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS
DRAINAGE AREA A = 0.00163 SQ. MI.
= 1.04 ACRES
DEVELOPED CONDITIONS:
COMPOSITE OF PAVEMENT AND LAWN GOOD
HYDROLOGIC GROUP - D
Tlag = 0.10
PAVEMENT - RCN 98
LAWN, GOOD - RCN 80
0.46 AC. IMPERVIOUS COVER
0.46 ACRES / 1.165 AC = 40%
(40% * 98) + (60% * 80) = 87
RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER -87
2 YR RUNOFF = 3 CFS
10 YR RUNOFF = 5 CFS
25 YR RUNOFF = 6 CFS
100 YR RUNOFF = 8 CFS
Th
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
a
r
e
t
h
e
s
o
l
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
o
f
S
T
E
G
E
R
&
B
I
Z
Z
E
L
L
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
,
I
N
C
.
T
h
e
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
i
s
h
e
r
e
b
y
r
e
s
t
r
i
c
t
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
o
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
s
i
t
e
f
o
r
w
h
i
c
h
t
h
e
y
w
e
r
e
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
.
R
e
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
r
r
e
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
i
n
w
h
o
l
e
o
r
i
n
p
a
r
t
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
w
r
i
t
t
e
n
p
e
r
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
o
f
S
T
E
G
E
R
&
B
I
Z
Z
E
L
L
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
,
I
N
C
.
i
s
s
t
r
i
c
t
l
y
p
r
o
h
i
b
i
t
e
d
.
NO.DATEREVISIONBY
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
DATE
DATE
DATE
DATE for
COLLEGE PLACE
Georgetown
Williamson County, Texas
P\22000-22999
22236 ILLIG TOWNHOMES
P\22000-22999
Xref DWG FILE.
Sheet Number:
Drawing Path:
SCALE:
Project Number:
Project Name:
Project Path:
22236
AS NOTED23-Sep-14
GEORGETOWN, TX 78626
STEGERBIZZELL.COM
>>ENGINEERS >>PLANNERS >>SURVEYORS
512.930.9412
SERVICES
METRO
ADDRESS
1978 S. AUSTIN AVENUE
WEB
JMC
23-Sep-14GAD, JMC
09-24-2014
22236 ILLIG TOWNHOMES23-Sep-14JMC
23-Sep-14JMC
SP-2014-011
TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-181
TBPLS FIRM No.10003700
The Architect/Engineer assumes
responsibility for appropriate
use of this standard.
The Architect/Engineer assumes
responsibility for appropriate
use of this standard.
The Architect/Engineer assumes
responsibility for appropriate
use of this standard.
EROSION & SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN & DETAILS
STABILIZED
CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCESILT
FENCE
SILT
FENCE
SANDBAGS FILLED WITH
PEA GRAVEL FOR GRATE
INLET PROTECTION
SCALE: 1" = 20'
SILT
FENCE
Th
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
a
r
e
t
h
e
s
o
l
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
o
f
S
T
E
G
E
R
&
B
I
Z
Z
E
L
L
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
,
I
N
C
.
T
h
e
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
i
s
h
e
r
e
b
y
r
e
s
t
r
i
c
t
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
o
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
s
i
t
e
f
o
r
w
h
i
c
h
t
h
e
y
w
e
r
e
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
.
R
e
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
r
r
e
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
i
n
w
h
o
l
e
o
r
i
n
p
a
r
t
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
w
r
i
t
t
e
n
p
e
r
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
o
f
S
T
E
G
E
R
&
B
I
Z
Z
E
L
L
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
,
I
N
C
.
i
s
s
t
r
i
c
t
l
y
p
r
o
h
i
b
i
t
e
d
.
NO.DATEREVISIONBY
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
DATE
DATE
DATE
DATE for
COLLEGE PLACE
Georgetown
Williamson County, Texas
P\22000-22999
22236 ILLIG TOWNHOMES
P\22000-22999
Xref DWG FILE.
Sheet Number:
Drawing Path:
SCALE:
Project Number:
Project Name:
Project Path:
22236
AS NOTED23-Sep-14
GEORGETOWN, TX 78626
STEGERBIZZELL.COM
>>ENGINEERS >>PLANNERS >>SURVEYORS
512.930.9412
SERVICES
METRO
ADDRESS
1978 S. AUSTIN AVENUE
WEB
JMC
23-Sep-14GAD, JMC
09-24-2014
22236 ILLIG TOWNHOMES23-Sep-14JMC
23-Sep-14JMC
SP-2014-011
TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-181
TBPLS FIRM No.10003700
DETAILS
APPROVED BY:DRAWN BY:
SCALE:DATE:
CITY OF GEORGETOWN
CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AND DETAILS
The Architect/Engineer assumes
responsibility for appropriate
use of this standard.
APPROVED BY:DRAWN BY:
SCALE:DATE:
CITY OF GEORGETOWN
CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AND DETAILS
The Architect/Engineer assumes
responsibility for appropriate
use of this standard.
WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWLWWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
PP
PP
WL
WL
WL
WLWLWL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WLWLWL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WLWLWL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WLWLWL
WL
WL
E
E
EEEEEEEE
EE
E
E
E E
E
E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E E E E E E E
WL
WL
WL
WLWLWL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WLWLWL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WLWLWL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WLWLWL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WLWLWL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WLWLWL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WLWLWL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WLWLWL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WLWLWL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WLWLWL
WL
WL
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
SI
D
E
W
A
L
K
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
SI
D
E
W
A
L
K
EXISTING
SIDEWALK
EXISTING
SIDEWALK
CON
C
.
RIP-
‐
R
A
P
CO
N
C
.
R
I
P
-
‐
R
A
P
EXISTING
PAVEMENT
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WLWL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WLWL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL
25'
BLDG
LINE
25
'
B
L
D
G
L
I
N
E
7'
BLDG.
LINE
10'
PUE
12"
PVC
CULV
E
R
T
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL
WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL WWL
WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL
EXIST.
6"
W.L.
EXIST.
8"
W.L.
EX
I
S
T
.
8
"
W.W
.L
.
EX
I
S
T
.
8
"
W
.
W
.L.
FFE
=
706.33'
FFE
=
705.29'
2nd
STREET
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
FFE
=
706.47'
FFE
=
706.46'
FFE
=
708.38'
FFE
=
708.38'
FFE
=
708.42'
CO
L
L
E
G
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
FFE
=
706.31'
FFE
=
706.34'
LOT
5
LOT
21
LOT
22
LOT
21
LOT
4 LOT
3 LOT
2 LOT
1
LOT
10 LOT
11 LOT
12 LOT
13 LOT
14
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
WL
EXIST.
8"
W.W.L.
15
EXISTING
PARKING
SPACES
15
EXISTING
PARKING
SPACES
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
SI
D
E
W
A
L
K
WATER
METERSWATER
METERS
WATER
VALVES
C/OC/O's
WATER
METERS
WATER
VALVES
C/O's
INLET
WATER
VALVE
WATER
VALVE
WATER
VALVE
WATER
METER
WATER
VALVE
A/C
A/CA/C
TRANSFORMER
EXISTING
FIRE
HYDRANT
WATER
VALVE
indian2, Quercus macrocarpa
Burr oak, 3" cal., container
3, Ulmus parvifolia sempervirens
Lacebaark elm, 3"cal., container
2, Quercus macrocarpa
Burr oak, 3" cal., container
Ulmus parvifolia sempervirens
Lacebaark elm 3"cal., container
4 Quercus Shumardii
Shumard oak, 3" cal., container
4, Abelia grandiflora
Glossy abelia 5 gal container
4, Leucophylum frutescens
Texas sage, 5 gal, container
1, Leucophylum frutescens
Texas sage, 5 gal, container
3, Ilex cornuta burfordii nana
Dwarf burford hilly, 5 gal. container
2, Ilex cornuta burfordii nana
Dwarf burford hilly, 5 gal. container
2, Raphiolepsis indica
Indian hawthorn, 5 gal. container
2, Raphiolepsis indica
Indian hawthorn, 5 gal. container
1, Myrica pusilla
Dwarf wax myrtle, 5 gal. container
1, Myrica pusilla
Dwarf Wax Myrtle, 5 gal. container
Existing Elms
Existing Elms
Existing Elms
PR
O
P
.
DU
M
P
S
T
E
R
EN
C
L
O
S
U
R
E
LOT
15
FFE
=
710.42
LOT
16
FFE
=
710.42
LOT
17
FFE
=
710.42
LOT
18
FFE
=
712.42
LOT
19
FFE
=
712.42
LOT
20
FFE
=
712.42
NEW
TOWNHOMES
THIS
PHASE
1, Acer grandidentatum
Bigtooth maple 3" cal., container
3, Acer grandidentatum
Bigtooth maple 3" cal., container
MailboxesZoned PUD
Zoned RS
Zoned RS
Zoned RS
Zoned RS
St
r
e
e
t
y
a
r
d
l
i
n
e
Landscape Plan
Scale: 1" = 20'-0"
N
Single Family Residential Use
Single
Family
Residential
Use
Single
Family
Residential
Use
Veterans Memorial Park Use
3 PHiladelphus coronarius
Mock Orange, 5 gal. container
Sheet
Of
Project Number
Scale as Shown
Design by:
Drawn by:
Date:
Sh
e
e
t
T
i
t
l
e
Th
e
T
e
x
a
s
B
o
a
r
d
o
f
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
E
x
a
m
i
n
e
r
s
h
a
s
j
u
r
i
s
d
i
c
t
i
o
n
o
v
e
r
c
o
m
p
l
a
i
n
t
s
r
e
g
a
r
d
i
n
g
t
h
e
p
r
o
f
e
s
s
i
o
n
a
l
p
r
a
c
t
i
c
e
s
o
f
p
e
r
s
o
n
s
r
e
g
i
s
t
e
r
e
d
a
s
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
a
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
s
i
n
T
e
x
a
s
.
T
e
x
a
s
B
o
a
r
d
o
f
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
E
x
a
m
i
n
e
r
s
, 3
3
3
G
u
a
d
a
l
u
p
e
S
t
r
e
e
t
, S
u
i
t
e
2
-
3
5
0
, A
u
s
t
i
n
, T
e
x
a
s
7
8
7
0
1
Ke
i
t
h
H
o
a
g
l
u
n
d
L
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
C
o
n
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
L
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
e
17
0
0
O
a
k
r
i
d
g
e
D
r
i
v
e
R
o
u
n
d
R
o
c
k
, T
e
x
a
s
7
8
6
8
1
51
2
-
4
7
0
-
5
1
6
7
i
n
f
o
@
k
h
l
a
n
d
a
r
c
h
.c
o
m
No
D
a
t
e
R
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
By
C
h
k
A
p
p
'
d
L-
Co
l
l
e
g
e
P
l
a
c
e
A
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
20
0
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
S
t
r
e
e
t
Ge
o
r
g
e
t
o
w
n
,
T
e
x
a
s
7
8
6
2
6
La
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
P
l
a
n
!
KH
KH
Sept. 23, 2014
September 23, 2014
1
.
H
I
OE
N
ASTEH
C
C
T
T
E
SA
T
ET
S
T
A
I
REG
31
OF
03 ET X
L
R
LDRE CAANDS
H
EPA
K
EI
G
U
D
PP
3, Ilex cornuta burfordii nana
Dwarf burford hilly, 5 gal. container
2, Ilex cornuta burfordii nana
Dwarf burford hilly, 5 gal. container
Loosen soil at bottom with a pick
Remove burlap from the top of the ball
Build three inch soil saucer around plant pit
Cover tree pit with 3' layer of bark mulch.
Do not put bark mulch against tree trunk
Existing soil
3"
6"
Top of root ball to be set at existing grade
Root Ball
min.
min.
Existing grade
Prune all dead or broken branches
Shrub Planting Detail Not to Scale
Loosen soil at bottom with a pick
Remove burlap from the top of the ball
Prune all dead or broken branches
Cover tree pit with 3' layer of bark mulch.
Do not put bark mulch against tree trunk
Existing soil
3"
6"6"
Top of root ball to be set at existing grade
Root Ball
min.min.
min.
(3) metal "T" posts
12 guage galvanised metal wire
1/2" I.D. reinforced rubber hose
Existing grade
Backfill pit with soil
Tree Planting Detail
Build three inch soil saucer around plant pit
Not to Scale
Plant Legend
Proposed Evergreen Shrub
Proposed Shade Tree
Count Botanical Name Common Name Size Root Leaf H2O Use
2 Acer grandidentatum Bigtooth Maple 3" cal.B&B D VL
2 Ulmas parvifolia sempervirens Lacebark elm 3" cal.B&B D M
2 Quercas macrocarpa Burr oak 3" cal.B&B D VL
2 Quercus shumardii Shumard oak 3" cal.B&B D L 5 Abelia Grandiflora Glossy abelia 7 gal. Cont. E L-M
5 llex cornuta "Burfordii Nana" Dwarf Burford holly 7 gal. Cont. E L 5 Leucophyllum frutescens Texas Sage 7 gal. Cont. E L
5 Raphiolepsis indica "Springtime" "Springtime" Indian hawthorn 7 gal. Cont. E M
3 Philadelphus coronaria Mock Orange 7 gal.Cont.D L-M
* Size listed is the minimum size required by the City of Georgetown
Plant List
Landscape Calculations
8.04.030 Street Yard Landscape Calculation:
Area= 214 ft. x 25 ft. = 5,350 sq. ft.
Landscape area required: 5,350 x .20 = 1070 sq. ft.
Landscape area provided: 4,725 sq.ft.
Shade trees required: 5350/ 5,000 = 1.07 or 1
Shade trees provided: 2 existing trees + 8 trees to be planted = 10
Shrubs required: 5,350 / 5000 = 1.07 x 3 = 3.21 or 3
Shrubs provided: 3
8.04.040 Parking Lot Landscaping
A. All parking is existing as approved in the Site Plan approved in
January 29, 1987. No landscpe required.
B. Due to the limited planting area available for the trees called for
in the original Site Plan. The 16 trees shown on the origainal plan
have been replaced by 16 new trees in locations more conducive to
healthy shade tree growth.
8.04.050 Gateway Overlay
The site is not in an Gateway Overlay district.
8.04.060 Buffer Yards
No buffer yards are required
8.04.070 Screening Landscape Required:
20 evergreen shrubs to be planted to screen parking area.
Trash and recycling containers are screened buy Architectural
walls and gates.
1.165 Acres
49,582 sq. ft.
.
16,842 sq. ft. 33%
3,521 sq. ft.
20,363 sq. ft. 40%
PUD Planned Unit Development
Condominium Townhomes
Build 6 additional condominium
townhomes as provided for in the
1987 Site Plan
No new parking required.
All required parking exists.
Dale Illig, LTD.
707 Rock Street
Georgetown, Texas 77079
Lots 15-21, College Place
situated in the Nicholas Porter Survey.
A-497 and the William Addison
Survey A-21 in Williamson County,
Texas as recorded in volume
1190, page 568 of the Deed of
Records
Check water usage for Plants
Site Location Map
Landscape Notes
1. This landscape plan has been designed and shall be installed to
meet all requirements of the City of Georgetown Uniform
Development Code. (UDC)
2. Plant materials are consistent with the City of Georgetown
Preferred Plant List.
3. All plants shall be planted in a prepared planting bed with a
minimum dimension of 3'-0".
4. All maintenance of the required landscape shall comply with
the maintenance standards of Section 8.06.040 of the UDC.
5. Screening if mechanical equipment, dumpsters and parking
shall comply with Section 8.04.070 of the UDC.
6. A separate irrigation plan shall be required at the time of
building permit in accordance with Section 8.06.050 of the UDC.
7. The current owner and susequent owners of the landscaped
property, or the manager or agent of the owner, shall be
responsible for the maintenance of all landscaped areas and
materials, required buffer yard areas and materials and required
screening materials. Said areas must be maintained so as to
present a healthy, neat and orderly appearance at all times and
shall be kept free of refuse and debris. Mainrenance will include
the replacement of all dead plant material if that material was
used to meet the requirements of the Unified Development
Code. All such plants shall be replaced within six months of
notification, or by the next planting season, whichever comes
first.
8. A Certification of Landscape Compliance letter is required
prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy in accordance
with Section 8.05.030 B 2 of the UDC
9. A Certification of Irrigation Compliance letter is required
prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy in accordance
with Section 8.05.030 B 3 of the UDC.
10. No more than 25% of plantings have been selected from any
one species.
11. At least 50% of the required plant materials are low water
users as identified on the preferred plant list.
Site Location Map
Site
8.04.030 Street Yard Landscape Calculation:
Area= 214 ft. x 25 ft. = 5,350 sq. ft.
Landscape area required: 5,350 x .20 = 1070 sq. ft.
Landscape area provided: 4,725 sq.ft.
Shade trees required: 5350/ 5,000 = 1.07 or 1
Shade trees provided: 2 existing trees + 8 trees to be planted = 10
Shrubs required: 5,350 / 5000 = 1.07 x 3 = 3.21 or 3
Shrubs provided: 3
8.04.040 Parking Lot Landscaping
A. All parking is existing as approved in the Site Plan approved in
January 29, 1987. No landscpe required.
B. Due to the limited planting area available for the trees called for
in the original Site Plan. The 16 trees shown on the origainal plan
have been replaced by 16 new trees in locations more conducive to
healthy shade tree growth.
8.04.050 Gateway Overlay
The site is not in an Gateway Overlay district.
8.04.060 Buffer Yards
No buffer yards are required
SITE
EXISTING
IMPERVIOUS COVER
PROPOSED
IMPERVIOUS COVER
TOTAL
IMPERVIOUS COVER
EXISTING ZONING
EXISTING LAND USE
PROPOSED USE
SITE OWNER
SUBDIVISION
1.165 Acres
49,582 sq. ft.
.
16,842 sq. ft. 33%
3,521 sq. ft.
20,363 sq. ft. 40%
PUD Planned Unit Development
Condominium Townhomes
Build 6 additional condominium
townhomes as provided for in the
1987 Site Plan
No new parking required.
All required parking exists.
Dale Illig, LTD.
707 Rock Street
Georgetown, Texas 77079
Lots 15-21, College Place
situated in the Nicholas Porter Survey.
A-497 and the William Addison
Survey A-21 in Williamson County,
Texas as recorded in volume
1190, page 568 of the Deed of
Records
PARKING:
Site DataLandscape Summary Table
4,7251,070 3 3 0 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1,070 4,725 3 3 0 0 0 0 1 8
20 20 20 20 0 0 0 0
0 0
1,070 4,725 23 23 20 20 0 0 1 8
All parking existing as approved on 1987 sote plan. NO additional planting required.
8
Not in Gateway overlay
No Bufferyard required
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for
exterior alterations and signage for the property located at 204 East 8th Street bearing the legal
description of Glasscock Addition, Block 9, Lot 7-8, 0.3306 acres.
ITEM SUMMARY:
The City of Georgetown is in receipt of a request for a CDC for exterior alterations to the property
located at 204 East 8th Street. According to the submitted letter of intent, the applicant wishes to
create a flagstone patio for outdoor seating and install a 3 foot wrought iron fence to delineate the
seating area.
Staff recommends approval of the request based on the findings that the request meets the
approval criteria of Section3.13.030 of the Unified Development Code (UDC), as outlined in the
attached Staff Report.
The affirmative vote of the majority of the HARC members is required to approve the CDC
request.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The applicant paid the required fees.
SUBMITTED BY:
Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
CDC-2014-041 Staff Report Backup Material
CDC-2014-041 Exhibit 1 Backup Material
CDC-2014-041 Exhibit 2 Backup Material
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-041 204 East 8th Street Page 1 of 4
Meeting Date: October 13, 2014 Agenda Item: F
File Number: CDC-2014-041
AGENDA ITEM DESCRIPTION
Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for
exterior alterations and signage for the property located at 204 East 8th Street bearing the legal
description of Glasscock Addition, Block 9, Lot 7-8, 0.3306 acres.
AGENDA ITEM DETAILS
Project Name: Eats on 8th Patio and Fence project
Applicant: Pat Mullins
Property Owner: Sophia’s Investments, LLC
Property Address: 204 East 8th Street
Legal Description: Glasscock Addition, Block 9, Lot 7-8, 0.3306 acres
Historic Overlay: Downtown, Area 2
Case History: This is the first public hearing for this case.
HISTORIC CONTEXT
Date of construction: ca. 1910
Historic Resources Survey Level of Priority: High Priority
National Register Designation: Eligible for listing
Texas Historical Commission Designation: None
APPLICANT’S REQUEST
The applicant requests a Certificate of Design Compliance for an approximately 1100 square foot
outdoor patio with a fence, located within the front and side yards of the historic structure. The
application includes a request for door signage and new sign mounted on the existing freestanding
sign bracket.
Sign Type Freestanding monument
Size 22.62 sq feet
Materials Printed aluminum
Location Installed on existing freestanding
monument sign bracket
Sign Type Door (x2)
Size 3.25 sq feet
Materials Printed vinyl
Location Installed on entry doors
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-041 204 East 8th Street Page 2 of 4
APPLICABLE DESIGN GUIDELINES
The following guidelines are applicable to the proposed scope of work in accordance with the adopted
Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines:
GUIDELINES FINDINGS
8.24 In new landscape designs, use materials that are
compatible with the historic context.
Complies
8.25 A new fence may be considered in transitional
areas with a residential context.
Complies
9.5 Freestanding or pole mounted signs may be
considered.
Complies
9.8 A window sign may be considered. Complies
STAFF ANALYSIS
The applicant seeks a Certificate of Design Compliance for a patio, fence and signage for the new
business at 204 East 8th Street. No changes to the ca. 1910 High Priority historic structure are proposed
at this time. The patio will be constructed of masonry materials, which are compatible with the historic
context of the subject property and adjacent properties, in compliance with Design Guideline 8.24. The
proposed three foot wrought iron fence will delineate the outdoor dining area from the public
sidewalks, allowing full utilization of the property without impacting the public. Fences are
appropriate for properties with a residential context when the structure is set back from the street. Per
Design Guideline 8.25, the fence is limited to three feet and height and at least 50% transparent.
The proposed signage utilizes the existing freestanding bracket located in the front yard of the
property. Per Design Guideline 9.5, freestanding signs are appropriate when the primary structure is
set back from the street. The colors and size for the freestanding sign comply with the requirements set
forth in the Design Guidelines. The door signage is appropriate on the entrances to the structure, and is
limited to less than 50% of the glass and less than 30% of all glass on the structure.
The creation of the outdoor dining area requires an approved site plan, currently under staff review.
HARC review is limited to the following items:
• Appropriateness of the materials for the patio
• Exterior signage
• Fencing
All other site plan components will be reviewed by the Planning Department for compliance with the
Unified Development Code.
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-041 204 East 8th Street Page 3 of 4
CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL
In accordance with Section 3.13.030 of the Unified Development Code, the HARC must consider the
following criteria:
SECTION 3.13.030 CRITERIA FINDINGS
A. The application is complete and the information
contained within the application is correct and
sufficient enough to allow adequate review and
final action;
The application was submitted and deemed
complete on October 7, 2014.
B. Compliance with any design standards of the
Unified Development Code;
The project complies with the design
standards of the Unified development Code,
as demonstrated on the approved site plan.
C. Compliance with the adopted Downtown Design
Guidelines, as may be amended from time to time,
specific to the applicable Historic or Overlay
District;
The proposed outdoor dining area and
signage comply with the Design Guidelines
as outlined in this staff report.
D. The integrity of an individual historic structure is
preserved.
The project has limited impact on the
historic structure and does not adversely
impact the historic integrity.
E. New buildings or additions are designed to be
compatible with surrounding historic properties.
No new buildings or additions are proposed
with this project.
F. The overall character of the Historic or applicable
Overlay District is protected.
The project does not create any significant
visual elements, protecting the overall
character of the Downtown Overlay District.
G. Signs that are out of keeping with the adopted
design standards, and are not in character with
the site or landmarks within the Historic or
applicable Overlay District in question will not be
permitted.
The proposed signage complies with the
standards set forth in the Downtown and
Old Town Design Guidelines as detailed in
this staff report.
H. The following may also be considered by the
HARC when determining whether to approve a
Certificate for Design Compliance:
1. The effect of the proposed change upon the
general historic, cultural, and architectural
nature of the site, landmark, or District.
2. The appropriateness of exterior architectural
features, including parking and loading
spaces, which can be seen from a public street,
alley, or walkway.
3. The general design, arrangement, texture,
material, and color of the building or structure
The proposed project at 204 East 8th Street
does not have a significant impact upon the
nature of the Downtown Overlay District.
The visual impact of the proposed
improvements is minimal, limiting the
impact on the district. The materials for the
proposed outdoor dining area are
appropriate for the property and the district.
No additional buildings or structures are
proposed with this project, and the overall
historic and architectural character of the
subject property and adjacent properties are
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-041 204 East 8th Street Page 4 of 4
SECTION 3.13.030 CRITERIA FINDINGS
and the relation of such factors to similar
features of buildings or structures in the
District, contrast or other relation of such
factors to other landmarks built at or during
the same period, as well as the uniqueness of
such features, considering the remaining
examples of architectural, historical, and
cultural values.
protected.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Based on the findings listed above, staff recommends approval of CDC-2014-041 as proposed.
As of the date of this report, staff has received no written comments regarding this project.
ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1 – Letter of Intent, Plans and Specifications
SUBMITTED BY
Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Eatson8thProposedSignage
1.5feet
2.17feet
ProposedFreestandingSign
(MountedonexisƟngsign)
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Discussion and possible action to approve an Alternative Parking Plan for the property located at 204 East
8th Street, bearing the legal description of Glasscock Addition, Block 9, Lots 7-8, 0.3306 acres
ITEM SUMMARY:
The City of Georgetown's Unified Development Code provides criteria for required parking for commercial
properties throughout the city. In cases where the required parking can't be met on the subject property, the
UDC outlines a process for approving alternative parking plans. While the UDC grants the authority to
approve Alternative Parking Plans to the Planning Director for projects outside of the Downtown Overlay
District, HARC serves as the review authority for properties within the Downtown Overlay District.
The parking ratio for the Downtown Overlay District is significantly reduced from other districts throughout
the city, due to the site restrictions posed by the historic development patterns. The parking ratio is 1 parking
space per 500 square feet of space allocated for the use. If the parking requirement cannot be accomplished
on the site, the applicant may request approval of an Alternative Parking Plan from the Commission.
Eats on 8th, the new business opening at 204 East 8th Street, is constructing an approximately 1100 square
foot outdoor dining area in the front and side yard of their property. The addition of the dining area increases
the parking requirement by two spaces, which cannot be satisfied on the site without significant alterations
and expense. The business owner is requesting the approval of an Alternative Parking Plan from the HARC
to satisfy their parking needs. The applicant proposes utilizing two existing parking spaces on East 8th
Street, located on the city Right-of-Way, immediately adjacent to the subject property.
Per Section 9.02.060 D of the Unified Development Code:
The Historic and Architectural Review Commission may approve counting on-street parking spaces to
satisfy the requirements for off-street parking. Such on-street parking shall be located on public right-of-way
immediately abutting the subject property and shall be reviewed by the Development Engineer for
compliance with the city's standards for use of rights-of-way.
The proposed parking is located within the City right-of-way along 8th Street, immediately abutting the
subject property. The development Engineer reviewed the request and approved the use consistent with other
uses of the City right-of-way.
Based upon the review criteria outlined in the UDC, staff recommends approval of the applicant's request for
an Alternative Parking Plan to satisfy the required parking.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None.
SUBMITTED BY:
Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
204 East 8th Street Parking Plan Backup Material
S
C
H
U
R
C
H
S
T
E 8 T H S T
±204 East 8th StreetEats on 8thAlternative Parking Plan
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Discussion of proposed historic district street signs
ITEM SUMMARY:
The City of Georgetown is developing a comprehensive signage plan for the local historic districts
to educate residents and enhance heritage tourism efforts. Staff has developed a preliminary design
and will present the design for recommendations from the HARC.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The purchase and installation of the proposed signs is included in the City of Georgetown's FY14-
15 Budget.
SUBMITTED BY:
Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Street sign design Backup Material
Street sign examples Backup Material
D o w n t o w n
H i s t o r i c
D i s t r i c t
N a Ɵ o n a l R e g i st e r D i s t r i c t W i l li a m s o n C o u n t y
C o u r th o u s e S qu a re
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Discussion of proposed Historic and Architectural Review Commission UDC revisions - Laurie
Brewer, Assistant City Manager
ITEM SUMMARY:
Per City Council resolution 052714-N, city staff is developing a list of proposed changes to the
Unified Development Code Development Standards for the Historic Overlay Districts and historic
resources. Staff will present the proposed changes and provide an opportunity for the Commission
to provide additional suggestions for the proposed changes.
Additional information regarding the proposed changes will be provided via email on Wednesday,
October 22nd.
The proposed changes will be presented at the regularly scheduled City Council Policy
Development workshop on October 28, 2014.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None
SUBMITTED BY:
Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Questions and comments from Commissioners in Training.
ITEM SUMMARY:
Questions and comments from Commissioners in Training
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None
SUBMITTED BY:
Karen Frost, Recording Secretary
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Staff updates and reminder of future meetings.
ITEM SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None
SUBMITTED BY:
Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
ITEM SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
-
SUBMITTED BY:
Karen Frost, Recording Secretary