HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda_HARC_03.13.2019Notice of Meeting for the
Historic and Architectural Rev iew Commission Demolition Subcommittee
of the City of Georgetown
March 13, 2019 at 10:00 AM
at 903 N. Myrtle Street, Georgetown Texas 78628
T he C ity of G eorgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If you
require as s is tance in partic ipating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the ADA, reas onable
as s is tance, adaptations , or ac commodations will be provided upon request. P leas e c ontact the C ity S ec retary's
O ffic e, at leas t three (3) days prior to the sc heduled meeting date, at (512) 930-3652 or C ity Hall at 808 Martin
Luther King Jr. S treet, G eorgetown, T X 78626 for additional information; T T Y users route through R elay
Texas at 711.
L egislativ e Regular Agenda
A Disc ussion and possible recommendation for the demolition of a low priority struc ture loc ated at 903 N.
Myrtle S treet – Madis on T homas , AI C P, His toric and Downtown P lanner
C E RT IF IC AT E O F P O S T IN G
I, R obyn Densmore, C ity S ecretary for the C ity of G eorgetown, Texas, do hereby c ertify that this Notic e of
Meeting was pos ted at C ity Hall, 808 Martin Luther King Jr. S treet, G eorgetown, T X 78626, a place readily
ac cessible to the general public at all times, on the ______ day of __________________, 2019, at
__________, and remained so pos ted for at least 72 continuous hours preceding the sc heduled time of s aid
meeting.
____________________________________
R obyn Densmore, C ity S ecretary
Page 1 of 19
City of Georgetown, Texas
Historic and Architectural Review
March 13, 2019
S UB J E C T:
Dis cus s ion and pos s ible rec ommendation for the demolition of a low priority s tructure located at 903 N.
Myrtle S treet – Madison T homas, AI C P, Historic and Downtown P lanner
IT E M S UMMARY:
T he applic ant is requesting demolition of the low priority struc ture c iting unreas onable economic hardship,
los s of s ignificance, and c ompelling public interes t.
F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
N/A
S UB MIT T E D B Y:
Madison T homas, AI C P Historic and Downtown P lanner
AT TAC H ME N T S:
Description Type
Exhibit 1- Letter of Intent Exhibit
Exhibit 2- Historic Res ources Survey Exhibit
Exhibit 3- Demolition Subcommittee Form Exhibit
Exhibit 4- HARC Criteria Exhibit
Exhibit 5- Demolition Proces s Exhibit
Page 2 of 19
Brookwood in Georgetown Expansion – Letter of Intent To whom it may concern, In this letter Brookwood in Georgetown would like to submit a formal request for demolition of 905 and 903 Myrtle St. structures, based on a combination of factors including loss of significance, unreasonable economic hardship, and compelling public interest. This letter will focus on these factors as they primarily relate to 905 Myrtle St. as the medium priority historical structure, though the intent is to include the low priority 903 Myrtle structure in consideration for demolition as well. Loss of Significance Though records of 905 Myrtle St. indicate it was constructed in 1930, very little historical significance has been maintained by its long series of owners, or by any neighboring structures or residences. In fact, the structure is currently zoned C-3 and the closest medium priority historical structure is over two blocks away, southwest of the home. Additionally, the home was significantly modified in 2005 with additions to the main living area (pier/beam), porch, and car port structures. These were constructed prior to the purchase in 2016 of the building by current owners and applicants Brookwood in Georgetown. These alterations have significantly changed the architectural condition of the structure from its original state, erasing any of its original historic value. Unreasonable Economic Hardship The structural integrity of this building and the future intended use of the site as a home for adults with special needs make it neither practical nor viable to utilize in such a way as to maintain perceived historical value. With significant changes to the original structure already added in 2005, any expansion or updates required for future use as a home would further alter the structure beyond recognition of its original state. Additionally, attempts to extract the original structure for relocation is also impractical, given its connectivity with the additions and concrete slab foundation. A complete demolition of the structure is the most appropriate approach to this site. Compelling Public Interest The proposed use of this site as a group home for special needs adults (designated an “assisted living” facility within the C-3 zoning designation) will be a critical expansion to serve the needs of the community into the future. Currently, no such facility exists in Williamson County, despite the thousands of adults living with special needs, and BiG intends to provide a critical opportunity for purposeful living and work opportunities for these valuable citizens. It is important to construct a facility unique for these needs on this site as it allows for close connectivity to their workplace for the many in wheelchairs. BiG Page 3 of 19
has been very grateful for the City of Georgetown’s support for this program, and trusts that these priorities will be considered in comparison with any past historical value associated with the existing structure. On behalf of Brookwood in Georgetown, Luke Lunsford Expansion Project Manager 281-703-4204 Page 4 of 19
PropertyOwnerProperty Address2018 Assessed ValueR040322BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN VOCATIONAL905 MYRTLE ST, GEORGETOWN, TX 78626$163,7782019 GENERAL INFORMATIONProperty StatusActiveProperty TypeLand - TransitionalLegal DescriptionAW0497 AW0497 - Porter, N. Sur., ACRES 0.238NeighborhoodG90QN - East G-town Nom-impAccountR-20-0497-0000-0015Map Number3-0327,(3-0818)2019 OWNER INFORMATIONOwner NameBROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN VOCATIONALOwner IDO0533264ExemptionsExempt PropertyPercent Ownership100%Mailing Address905 N CHURCH ST #STE 101 GEORGETOWN, TX 786262018 VALUE INFORMATIONImprovement Homesite Value$0Improvement Non-Homesite Value$75,138Total Improvement Market Value$75,138Land Homesite Value$0Land Non-Homesite Value$88,640Land Agricultural Market Value$0Total Land Market Value$88,640Total Market Value$163,778Agricultural Use$0Total Appraised Value$163,778Homestead Cap Loss-$0Total Assessed Value$163,7782018 ENTITIES & EXEMPTIONSSpecial ExemptionsEX - Exempt PropertyTAXING ENTITYEXEMPTIONSEXEMPTIONS AMOUNTTAXABLE VALUETAX RATE PER 100TAX CEILINGCAD- Williamson CAD$0$000CGT- City of Georgetown$0$00.420GWI- Williamson CO$0$00.4190290RFM- Wmsn CO FM/RD$0$00.040SGT- Georgetown ISD$0$01.4090TOTALS2.288029Print property informationPage 5 of 19
2018 IMPROVEMENTS Expand/Collapse All2018 LAND SEGMENTSLAND SEGMENT TYPESTATE CODEHOMESITEMARKET VALUEAG USE LOSSLAND SIZE1 - ResidentialXV - Other ExemptionsNo$88,640$010,367 Sq. ftTOTALS10,367 Sq. ft / 0.238000 acresImprovement #1State CodeHomesiteTotal Main AreaMarket Value-XV - Other ExemptionsNo1,284 Sq. Ft$75,138RECORDTYPEYEAR BUILTSQ. FTVALUEADD'L INFO1Main Area19301,284$58,535 Details2Carport-320$3,647 Details3Open Porch-576$6,565 Details4Patio-24$21 Details5Patio-133$116 Details6Utility/storage-270$6,154 Details7Out Bldg--$100 DetailsClassH1 (H1 - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL IN OLD TOWN)Bedrooms1172Flooring-Eff. Year Built2005Baths (Full, ½, ¾)-FoundationPB (Pier/beam)Adjustment %87%Heat and ACCHCAInt. Finish-Roof StyleGBLFireplaces-Ext. FinishWDClassH1 (H1 - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL IN OLD TOWN)Bedrooms-Flooring-Eff. Year Built2005Baths (Full, ½, ¾)-Foundation-Adjustment %87%Heat and AC-Int. Finish-Roof Style-Fireplaces-Ext. Finish-ClassH1 (H1 - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL IN OLD TOWN)Bedrooms-Flooring-Eff. Year Built2005Baths (Full, ½, ¾)-Foundation-Adjustment %87%Heat and AC-Int. Finish-Roof Style-Fireplaces-Ext. Finish-Class-Bedrooms-Flooring-Eff. Year Built2005Baths (Full, ½, ¾)-Foundation-Adjustment %87%Heat and AC-Int. Finish-Roof Style-Fireplaces-Ext. Finish-Class-Bedrooms-Flooring-Eff. Year Built2005Baths (Full, ½, ¾)-Foundation-Adjustment %87%Heat and AC-Int. Finish-Roof Style-Fireplaces-Ext. Finish-ClassH1 (H1 - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL IN OLD TOWN)Bedrooms-Flooring-Eff. Year Built2005Baths (Full, ½, ¾)-Foundation-Adjustment %87%Heat and AC-Int. Finish-Roof Style-Fireplaces-Ext. Finish-Class-Bedrooms-Flooring-Eff. Year Built2005Baths (Full, ½, ¾)-Foundation-Adjustment %85%Heat and AC-Int. Finish-Roof Style-Fireplaces-Ext. Finish-Page 6 of 19
VALUE HISTORYYEARIMPROVEMENTLANDMARKETAG MARKETAG LOSSAPPRAISEDHS CAP LOSSASSESSED2017$211,103$69,300$280,403$0$0$280,403$0$280,4032016$136,720$40,821$177,541$0$0$177,541$0$177,5412015$145,069$40,821$185,890$0$0$185,890$16,956$168,9342014$113,433$40,143$153,576$0$0$153,576$0$153,5762013$115,216$39,753$154,969$0$0$154,969$0$154,969SALES HISTORYDEED DATESELLERBUYERINSTR #VOLUME/PAGE1/11/2016BRYCE, MICHAELBROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN VOCATIONAL20160040311/2/2015CAUDLE, GENA ABRYCE, MICHAEL20140006228/29/2005COLE, PHILIP DUDLEYCAUDLE, GENA A20050737094/24/1997COLE PHILIP DUDLEY &COLE, PHILIP DUDLEY97255556/17/1994BRIZENDINE, WALTERINE EXECCOLE PHILIP DUDLEY &-2554/05503/14/1994BURK, BESSIE LBRIZENDINE, WALTERINE EXEC-286 CAUSE/050 #143569/29/1993BURK, WALTER GBURK, BESSIE L-281/131VETERANS LAND BOARD OF TEXASBURK, WALTER G-387/488Page 7 of 19
Page 8 of 19
Page 9 of 19
Structure Photographs 905 Myrtle St. Page 10 of 19
Page 11 of 19
903 Myrtle St. Page 12 of 19
Page 13 of 19
TEXAS HISTORICAL COMMISSION
County Williamson Local District:
Address:903 N Myrtle St 2016 Survey ID:126251
City Georgetown
HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY FORM
2016 Preservation Priority:Low
SECTION 1
Basic Inventory Information
WCAD ID:R359216Property Type:Building Structure Object Site District
Date Recorded 5/6/2016Recorded by:CMEC
EstimatedActual Source:WCADConstruction Date:1920
Bungalow
Other
Center Passage
Shotgun
Open2-roomModified L-plan
Rectangular
T-plan
Four Square
L-plan
Irregular
Plan
International
Ranch
No Style
Post-war Modern
Commercial Style
Other
Pueblo Revival
Prairie
Art Deco
Spanish Colonial
Craftsman
Moderne
Gothic Revival
Neo-Classical
Mission
Tudor Revival
Beaux Arts
Monterey
Shingle
Folk Victorian
Renaissance Revival
Romanesque Revival
Colonial Revival
Exotic Revival
Log traditional
Italianate
Eastlake
Greek Revival
Second Empire
Queen Anne
Stylistic Influence(s)
Note: See additional photo(s) on page 2
General Notes:
Explain:Property lacks integrity
Geographic Location
Latitude:30.649127 Longitude -97.675111
Current/Historic Name:None/None
High Medium
Priority:
Low
High Medium Low
ID Not Recorded
ID Not Recorded
2007 Survey
1984 Survey
ID 126251 2016 Survey High Medium Low
Photo direction: East
Page 14 of 19
TEXAS HISTORICAL COMMISSION
County Williamson Local District:
Address:903 N Myrtle St 2016 Survey ID:126251
City Georgetown
HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY FORM
2016 Preservation Priority:Low
Additional Photos
NortheastPhoto Direction
Ancillary (not historic-age)
NortheastPhoto Direction
Ancillary (not historic-age)
EastPhoto Direction
Page 15 of 19
HISTORIC AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
DEMOLITION SUBCOMMITTEE
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
FILE NUMBER:
MEETING DATE:
MEETING LOCATION:
APPLICANT:
SUBCOMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT:
STAFF PRESENT:
OTHERS PRESENT:
COMMENTS
Applicant:
Subcommittee:
What is the existing (structural) condition of the structure? Are there any structural changes that
should be made to the structure for re‐occupancy?
Would the original owner be able to recognize the structure today? What changes have been made to
the structure (excluding cosmetic features)? Are structural changes needed to bring back the
structure to its original design?
Page 16 of 19
File Number:
Meeting Date:
Page 2 of 2
May the structure, in whole or in part, be preserved or restored?
May the structure be moved (relocated) without incurring any damages?
Does the structure, including any additions or alterations, represent a historically significant style,
architecture, craftsmanship, event or theme?
Are there any materials or unique features that can be salvaged? If so, which ones?
Other comments
RECOMMENDATION
Approval
Approval with Conditions:
Disapproval
Based on:
Subcommittee Chair Signature (or representative) Date
Page 17 of 19
Sec. 3.13.030. - Certificate of Appropriateness—HARC Approval.
F. Criteria for Approval for Relocation, Removal or Demolition of a Historic Landmark or
Contributing Historic Structure.
1. The Historic and Architectural Review Commission shall use circumstances or items that are
unique to the building or structure proposed to be relocated, removed or demolished when
reviewing the application.
2. The Historic and Architectural Review Commission shall make the following findings when
considering a request for demolition or relocation of a structure:
a. Loss of Significance.
i. The applicant has provided information that the building or structure is no longer
historically, culturally or architecturally significant, or is no longer contributing to the
historic overlay district; and
ii. The applicant has established that the building or structure has undergone significant
and irreversible changes, which have caused the building or structure to lose the
historic, cultural or architectural significance, qualities or features which qualified the
building or structure for such designation; and
iii. The applicant has demonstrated that any changes to the building or structure were
not caused either directly or indirectly by the owner, and were not due to intentional or
negligent destruction, or lack of maintenance rising to the level of a demolition by
neglect; and
iv. Demolition or relocation of the building or structure will not cause significant adverse
effect on the historic overlay district or the City's historic resources; or
b. Unreasonable Economic Hardship.
i. The applicant has demonstrated that the property owner cannot take reasonable,
practical or viable measures to adaptively use, rehabilitate or restore the building or
structure, or make reasonable beneficial use of, or realize a reasonable rate of return
on a building or structure unless the building or structure may be demolished or
relocated; and
ii. The applicant must prove that the structure cannot be reasonably adapted for any
other feasible use, which would result in a reasonable rate of return; or
c. There is a compelling public interest that justifies relocation, removal or demolition of the
structure.
Page 18 of 19
Page 19 of 19