Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda_HARC_03.26.2015Notice of Meeting for the Historic and Architectural Review Commission of the City of Georgetown March 26, 2015 at 6:00 PM at Georgetown Municipal Complex, 300-1 Industrial Avenue, Georgetown, TX 78627 The City of Georgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If you require assistance in participating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the ADA, reasonable assistance, adaptations, or accommodations will be provided upon request. Please contact the City at least four (4) days prior to the scheduled meeting date, at (512) 930-3652 or City Hall at 113 East 8th Street for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. Regular Session (This Regular Session may, at any time, be recessed to convene an Executive Session for any purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code 551.) A The Historic and Architectural Review Commission, appointed by the Mayor and the City Council, is responsible for hearing and taking final action on applications, by issuing Certificates of Design Compliance based upon the City Council adopted Downtown Design Guidelines and Unified Development Code. Commission may, at any time, recess the Regular Session to convene an Executive Session at the request of the Chair, a Commissioner, the Director or legal counsel for any purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code Chapter 551. Welcome and Meeting Procedures: Staff Presentation Applicant Presentation (Limited to ten minutes unless stated otherwise by the Commission.) Questions from Commission to Staff and Applicant Comments from Citizens * Applicant Response Commission Deliberative Process Commission Action * Those who speak must turn in a speaker form, located at the back of the room, to the recording secretary before the item they wish to address begins. Each speaker will be permitted to address the Commission one time only for a maximum of three minutes. Legislative Regular Agenda B Review and possible approval of the minutes of the February 26, 2015 meeting. C Consideration and possible action to elect the Vice-Chair and Secretary of the HARC. D Consideration and possible action to appoint the HARC Demolition Subcommittee. E Consideration and possible action to appoint the HARC Sign Subcommittee. F Review of Council approved Bylaws of the Historic and Architectural Review Commission. G Review of meeting procedures and Robert's Rules of Order. H Questions and comments from Commissioners in Training. I Staff updates and reminder of upcoming meetings related to HARC. Adjournment CERTIFICATE OF POSTING I, Jessica Brettle, City Secretary for the City of Georgetown, Texas, do hereby certify that this Notice of Meeting was posted at City Hall, 113 E. 8th Street, a place readily accessible to the general public at all times, on the ______ day of __________________, 2015, at __________, and remained so posted for at least 72 continuous hours preceding the scheduled time of said meeting. ____________________________________ Jessica Brettle, City Secretary City of Georgetown, Texas Historic and Architectural Review March 26, 2015 SUBJECT: The Historic and Architectural Review Commission, appointed by the Mayor and the City Council, is responsible for hearing and taking final action on applications, by issuing Certificates of Design Compliance based upon the City Council adopted Downtown Design Guidelines and Unified Development Code. Commission may, at any time, recess the Regular Session to convene an Executive Session at the request of the Chair, a Commissioner, the Director or legal counsel for any purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code Chapter 551. Welcome and Meeting Procedures: Staff Presentation Applicant Presentation (Limited to ten minutes unless stated otherwise by the Commission.) Questions from Commission to Staff and Applicant Comments from Citizens * Applicant Response Commission Deliberative Process Commission Action * Those who speak must turn in a speaker form, located at the back of the room, to the recording secretary before the item they wish to address begins. Each speaker will be permitted to address the Commission one time only for a maximum of three minutes. ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: na SUBMITTED BY: Karen Frost, Recording Secretary City of Georgetown, Texas Historic and Architectural Review March 26, 2015 SUBJECT: Review and possible approval of the minutes of the February 26, 2015 meeting. ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: NA SUBMITTED BY: ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Minutes of HARC 02262015 Backup Material Historic and Architectural Review Commission Page 1 of 4 Meeting: February 26, 2015 City of Georgetown, Texas Historic and Architectural Review Commission Workshop Minutes Thursday, February 26, 2015 at 6:00 p.m. Council and Courts Building 101 E. 7th Street, Georgetown, TX 78626 Members present: Anna Eby, Chair; Nancy Night; Ty Gipson; Richard Mee; David Paul and Mary Jo Winder. Commissioners in Training present: Rodolfo Martinez, Barbara Price Commissioners absent: Jennifer Brown Staff present: Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner; Laurie Brewer, Assistant City Manager; Andreina Davila, Project Coordinator; Jackson Daly, Executive Assistant; and Karen Frost, Recording Secretary. A. Call to Order by Eby at 6:00 p.m. with the reading of the meeting procedures. Legislative Regular Agenda B. Discussion and possible action to approve the minutes from the December 11, 2014 regular meeting. Motion by Paul to approve the minutes as presented. Second by Knight. Approved 6 – 0. C. Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for a residential addition on the property located at 711 East 8th Street bearing the legal description of Clamp’s Addition Revised, Block E (E/PT) 0.1744 acres. Synatschk presented the staff report and explained the case. The applicant is requesting a CDC for a residential addition in the Old Town Overlay District. According to the letter of intent, the applicant wishes to construct a two story addition, including a garage on the first floor and additional living space on the second floor. The applicant’s request includes approval to use the underlying Residential Single-family zoning district. Guideline 14.16 states that “an addition shall be compatible in scale, materials, character and architectural style of the main building.” The materials and architectural style of the proposed addition are compatible with the historic structure. However, the scale and character are not compatible with the historic structure. The proposed addition is 145% of the square footage of the existing structure, with flat vertical walls lacking the details, attributes and features that distinguish the addition from the existing historic structure. The design guidelines allow for a larger addition, but suggest the use of a connector to separate the addition from the existing structure, when feasible. The guidelines also suggest the use of dormers instead of creating a full second floor. The HARC may consider recommending the use of a connector, or changes to the façade to create a more detailed street facing façade. Possible options include changing the roof line to allow for the use of dormers on the east elevation; or applying a different siding material to the second story, to the east building façade (Pine Street). Due to ZBA’s denial of the setback modification and conflicts with the setback requirements, the applicant has expressed an interest in looking at the possibility of acquiring a portion of the ROW/easement to allow construction of the addition at the proposed location and outside of the required rear setback. If the applicant is able to acquire a minimum of 15 feet of the ROW/easement, Historic and Architectural Review Commission Page 2 of 4 Meeting: February 26, 2015 the Setback Modification and the CDC allowance for use of the rear setback of the underlying RS zoning district would no longer be required. However, HARC approval would still be required to utilize the side setback of the underlying RS zoning district, as well as the 1,740-square foot two-story addition next to the existing street facing façade. Because of this, the applicant requests that HARC review the proposed addition on its own merit in accordance with the applicable Guidelines and criteria for approval, and as if no setback modification or exception would be required, but not take final action on the request. Considering the proposed addition on its own without the need for a rear setback modification, staff recommends approval with the following conditions: the east building façade must include at least one of the following changes: construction of a smaller connector to set the addition away from the house; change the roof line to allow for the use of dormers on the east elevation; or apply a different siding material to the second story of the east elevation. Staff recommends approval of the application to utilize the base RS zoning district setbacks. In regards to the addition, until the issue with the ROW/easement is resolved, staff recommends one of the following: 1) Should HARC find that the addition, as designed, meets the criteria for approval, staff recommends that HARC continue the case until future meeting as agreed by both the applicant and HARC to allow time for additional research in to acquiring a portion of the ROW/easement; or 2) Should HARC find that the addition, as designed, does not meet the criteria for approval, staff recommends that HARC disapprove the request. Chair Eby asked the applicant if he had any comments. James Grove stated that he only wished to get a feel of what the Commission would like to see him do. Eby opened the Public Hearing at 6:12 and with no speakers coming forward, closed the hearing. Motion by Nancy to continue the case. No seconds were made so motion died. Andreina Davila explained the issues for the commission giving them options on their action to be taken. The commissioners debated the design of the structure and its style and compatibility with the neighborhood. They explained to Mr. Groves that the window to wall ratio of the new structure should be more consistent with the window to wall ratio of the existing structure. Motion by Knight to continue this case, CDC-2014-052, to the April regular meeting to allow the applicant to work further on the design and the right-of-way issue. Second by Paul. Approved 6 – 0. Historic and Architectural Review Commission Page 3 of 4 Meeting: February 26, 2015 D. Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for exterior alterations and signage for the property located at 124 East 8th Street, bearing the legal description of City of Georgetown, Block 52, Lot 1 (NE/PT) Synatschk presented the staff report. The applicant is proposing new trim paint and business signage for the High priority structure located in Area 1 of the Downtown Overlay District. The proposed paint scheme is designed to highlight the character defining features of the building, primarily the transom windows, storefront windows and the doors. The proposed paint is for the 8th Street façade only; no changes are proposed for the Church Street façade. The current muted base color will remain in place, with the trim and doors painted as proposed by the applicant. The accent color is appropriate for the structure, utilizing colors from the unpainted brick on the Church Street façade, blending the two facades together. The proposed projecting sign and hanging signs are allowed by the design guidelines for buildings located in the Downtown Overlay District. Based on the findings listed above, staff recommends the following approval for CDC-2014-053: 1. The proposed paint scheme as presented, 2. The proposed projecting sign, lowered one foot below the cornice line, and 3. The proposed hanging sign, in a color scheme coordinated with the façade and other signage. The applicant Davin Hoyt was available for questions and asked for clarification of staff’s recommendations. Synatschk explained. Eby opened the Public Hearing at 6:57 and with no once coming forth, closed it. Winder moved to approved the application with the trim paint colors be approved, and the condition that the hanging sign paint colors be made consistent with the façade and the other signs, to be reviewed by Synatschk before permitting, and the projecting sign brackets are to be moved down to not damage the architectural features at the top of the column. Second by Mee. Approved 5 – 1. (Knight opposed) E. Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for residential addition for the property located at 1318 University Avenue, bearing the legal description of Outlot Division B, Block 12 (PT), 0.9506 acres. Synatschk presented the staff report. The applicant proposes to remove a non-historic addition to the east façade of the house, and construct a new addition, approximately 900 square feet in total size. Previous renovations on the structure resulted in the replacement of the existing siding, new windows, new roof and other exterior changes, greatly reducing the historic materials on the structure. The proposed materials are consistent with the style of the structure and are appropriate for the project. The new addition will be setback from the primary façade, with a narrow section that expands to a perpendicular wing on the end. The combined building setback, different roof pitch and building skirt height will create the required differentiation for the structure. Staff recommends approval of CDC-2015-001 as submitted. Grace and Jarrod Pyka, the applicants, were available for questions by the commissioners. Historic and Architectural Review Commission Page 4 of 4 Meeting: February 26, 2015 Eby opened the Public Hearing and with no speakers coming forth, closed it. Motion by Knight to approve the application for CDC-2015-001 as presented. Second by Gipson. Approved 6 – 0. F. Questions and comments from Commissioners in Training. No questions or comments. G. Staff updates and reminder of future meetings. • The Parking Study received 500 responses, Public Meetings will be held on March 11. • The Tax Incentive Workshop will be held March 12th • March 18th, a volunteer project with Serteens to redo the historic markers in Founders Park. • March 9th Sign Subcommittee meeting is cancelled. • March 26th meeting will be held. • The RFP for the Historic Resource Survey will be put out next week. This is being done in phases. • The Grace Heritage Center is being assessed this year for rehabilitation in next year. • The Sidewalk Ordinance will be going to City Council in April, regarding ADA compliance in downtown. And last but not least, recognition of David Paul for 4 years of service to the Commission and to our two commissioners-in-training, Rodolfo Martinez and Barbara Price. Adjournment. Motion by Knight to adjourn, second by Mee. The meeting was adjourned at 7:30 p.m. ________________________________ _______________________________ Approved, Anna Eby, Chair Attest, Nancy Knight City of Georgetown, Texas Historic and Architectural Review March 26, 2015 SUBJECT: Consideration and possible action to elect the Vice-Chair and Secretary of the HARC. ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: NA SUBMITTED BY: Karen Frost, Recording Secretary City of Georgetown, Texas Historic and Architectural Review March 26, 2015 SUBJECT: Consideration and possible action to appoint the HARC Demolition Subcommittee. ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: NA SUBMITTED BY: Karen Frost, Recording Secretary City of Georgetown, Texas Historic and Architectural Review March 26, 2015 SUBJECT: Consideration and possible action to appoint the HARC Sign Subcommittee. ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: NA SUBMITTED BY: Karen Frost, Recording Secretary City of Georgetown, Texas Historic and Architectural Review March 26, 2015 SUBJECT: Review of Council approved Bylaws of the Historic and Architectural Review Commission. ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: NA SUBMITTED BY: Karen Frost, Recording Secretary ATTACHMENTS: Description Type 2011 Signed Bylaws Backup Material City of Georgetown, Texas Historic and Architectural Review March 26, 2015 SUBJECT: Review of meeting procedures and Robert's Rules of Order. ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: NA SUBMITTED BY: Karen Frost, Recording Secretary City of Georgetown, Texas Historic and Architectural Review March 26, 2015 SUBJECT: Questions and comments from Commissioners in Training. ITEM SUMMARY: Questions and comments from Commissioners in Training. FINANCIAL IMPACT: NA SUBMITTED BY: Karen Frost, Recording Secretary City of Georgetown, Texas Historic and Architectural Review March 26, 2015 SUBJECT: Staff updates and reminder of upcoming meetings related to HARC. ITEM SUMMARY: a) Promotion (Cindy, Marcy, Jim, Vicki): 5th Anniversary Swirl; updates on other action plan projects b) Economic Restructuring (Marcy, Jim, Julie, Vicki): Breakfast Bites; Granbury Trip; College Town Committee; updates on other action plan projects c) Design (Amanda, Julie, David): Main Street Mural call for art; updates on other action plan projects d) Organization (David, Cindy, Amanda): Board action plan update and committee suggestions; updates on other action plan projects FINANCIAL IMPACT: N/A SUBMITTED BY: Matt Synatschk ATTACHMENTS: Description Type HARC Meetings Schedule 2015 - 2016 Backup Material Historic and Architectural Review Commission (4th Thursday) Applications may be submitted at any time. The Agenda Deadline is not a submittal deadline; it is the last day an item may be added to a meeting agenda to meet notification requirements. Additional time is needed for processing and review of applications; therefore you are encouraged to submit your application as early as possible in advance of this date to avoid delays. Please refer to the Application Review Timelines chart in this Development Manual to estimate overall processing time. All issues must be resolved before an item can be added to an agenda. Staff will determine when your application is ready for the public meeting and notify you accordingly. Historic & Architectural Review Commission Agenda Deadline HARC Meeting December 26, 2014 January 22, 2015 January 27, 2015 February 26 February 27 March 26 March 27 April 23 May 1 May 28 May 29 June 25 June 26 July 23 July 31 August 27 August 28 September 24 September 25 October 22 * November 13 * December 10 December 31 January 28, 2016 January 29, 2016 February 25 February 26 March 24 April 1 April 28 April 29 May 26 May 27 June 23 July 1 July 28 July 29 August 25 August 26 September 22 September 30 October 27 ** November 11 * December 8 * November and December regular meetings are combined due to the Holidays. The combined meeting is held on the second Thursday of December. City of Georgetown, Texas Historic and Architectural Review March 26, 2015 SUBJECT: ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: na SUBMITTED BY: