HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda_PAREB_09.09.2021Notice of Meeting for the
P arks and Recreation Adv isory Board
of the City of Georgetown
September 9, 2021 at 6:00 P M
at 1101 N. College Street, Georgetown, T X 78626
T he C ity of G eorgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If you
require as s is tance in partic ipating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the ADA, reas onable
as s is tance, adaptations , or ac commodations will be provided upon request. P leas e c ontact the C ity S ec retary's
O ffic e, at leas t three (3) days prior to the sc heduled meeting date, at (512) 930-3652 or C ity Hall at 808 Martin
Luther King Jr. S treet, G eorgetown, T X 78626 for additional information; T T Y users route through R elay
Texas at 711.
Regular Session
(T his R egular S es s ion may, at any time, be rec es s ed to c onvene an Exec utive S es s ion for any purpose
authorized by the O pen Meetings Act, Texas G overnment C ode 551.)
A C all to O rder - Katherine Kainer, P arks and R ec reation Advisory Board C hair
B R oll C all - Katherine Kainer, P arks and R ecreation Advis ory Board C hair
C P arks and R ec reation staff member introduc tion and presentation - Kimberly G arrett, P arks and
R ec reation Direc tor
D C ons ideration and possible action to approve minutes from the Augus t 12, 2021 meeting - Jill Kellum,
Adminis trative S upervis or
E Update from the F riends of G eorgetown P arks and R ecreation - P eter Bahrs, P arks and R ec reation
Advis ory Boardmember Liais on
F P resentation by the G eorgetown Trails F oundation to build mountain bike trails parallel to the hike and
bike trails . -- Kimberly G arrett, P arks and R ec reation Direc tor
G Disc ussion on the P arks and R ecreation Master P lan S urvey R esults -- Kimberly G arrett, P arks and
R ec reation Direc tor
H P resentation and dis cus s ion on the c ommitted regional trail s egments along the S outh S an G abriel R iver. -
- Kimberly G arrett, P arks and R ec reation Direc tor
I Direc tor R eport - Kimberly G arrett, P arks and R ec reation Direc tor
J C apital P rojec t Updates - Eric Nuner, Assistant P arks and R ec reation Direc tor
K Disc ussion to set a time and a date for the P arks and R ec reation Advisory Board park tour. - Kimberly
G arrett
P ublic Wishing to Address the B oard
O n a s ubjec t that is posted on this agenda: P lease fill out a speaker regis tration form whic h can be found at the
Board meeting. C learly print your name, the letter of the item on which you wish to speak, and pres ent it to the
S taff Liais on, preferably prior to the start of the meeting. You will be c alled forward to speak when the Board
cons iders that item.
O n a s ubjec t not posted on the agenda: P ersons may add an item to a future Board agenda by filing a written
request with the S taff Liais on no later than one week prior to the Board meeting. T he reques t must include the
Page 1 of 74
s peaker's name and the spec ific topic to be addres s ed with sufficient information to inform the board and the
public . F or Board Liaison c ontact information, pleas e logon to
http://government.georgetown.org/c ategory/boards -commissions /.
L At the time of this posting, no one had signed up to speak.
Adjournment
Ce rtificate of Posting
I, R obyn Densmore, C ity S ecretary for the C ity of G eorgetown, Texas, do hereby c ertify that this Notic e of
Meeting was posted at C ity Hall, 808 Martin Luther King Jr. S treet, G eorgetown, T X 78626, a plac e readily
acc es s ible to the general public as required by law, on the _____ day of _________________, 2021, at
__________, and remained s o posted for at leas t 72 c ontinuous hours prec eding the s cheduled time of said
meeting.
__________________________________
R obyn Dens more, C ity S ec retary
Page 2 of 74
City of Georgetown, Texas
Parks and Rec Advisory Board
September 9, 2021
S UB J E C T:
C onsideration and pos s ible ac tion to approve minutes from the August 12, 2021 meeting - Jill Kellum,
Administrative S upervisor
IT E M S UMMARY:
F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
N/A
S UB MIT T E D B Y:
Jill Kellum, Adminis trative S upervis or
AT TAC H ME N T S:
Description Type
Minutes Backup Material
Page 3 of 74
Minutes of the Meeting of the
Parks and Recreation Advisory Board
City of Georgetown, Texas
August 12, 2021
(This Regular Session may, at any time, be recessed to convene an Executive Session for any
purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code 551.)
A Call to Order - Katherine Kainer, Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Chair
Katherine Kainer called the meeting to order at 6:02 pm.
B Roll Call - Katherine Kainer, Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Chair
Katherine Kainer, Chad Holz, Jolene Melancon, Peter Bahrs, Brazos Fielder, Jack Flatau, Lindsay
Cooper
Staff present: Eric Nuner, Jill Kellum
C Parks and Recreation staff member introduction and presentation - Eric Nuner,
Assistant Parks and Recreation Director
Eric Nuner introduced Jill Kellum, Administrative Supervisor, and she gave a brief introduction
of herself and job duties.
D Update from the Friends of Georgetown Parks and Recreation - Peter Bahrs, Parks and
Recreation Advisory Boardmember Liaison
Peter Bahrs stated there was a call that he and Kimberly Garrett and Jean Houck were on. The
call was concerning the family dance in October and if they still wanted to have it.
E Capital Project Updates - Eric Nuner, Assistant Parks and Recreation Director
• Eric Nuner stated the ADA Trail Construction is moving along well. There are areas
around Chandler Park that are complete.
• There is approval from planning and the state for the Heritage Gardens. Staff will start
demolition late August, then construction will begin in September and the goal is to be
open by January 2022. Eric Nuner stated there will be a restroom. There will be in
ground and raised beds available with some being ADA accessible. Lindsay Cooper
asked how large the Heritage Garden area is. Eric Nuner stated it is about 17 acres and
the garden area will be gated.
• Eric Nuner stated there have been some delays at University Park. Staff is working with
the playground vendor and are working through some designs with them. The
renderings will be presented to the neighborhood in September. Construction will start
in late winter or early 2022.
• ADA Modifications are complete. Eric Nuner stated they are evaluating round two and
will start those in the next budget year.
Page 4 of 74
• For the Wolf Crossing Trail, staff has received approval through TCEQ. Staff is in the
process with planning and zoning. The biggest delay is the easement with the property
owner to allow the trail to go through a private area. There is progress being made.
• Eric Nuner stated the final survey was completed the end of July for the Parks and
Recreation Open Space Master Plan and the public input meeting will be at City Hall on
August 25th at 6 pm.
• Chad Holz asked when the board would start seeing the CIP budget items for next year.
Eric Nuner stated that will be after October. He stated what they have for next year is
some trail work where they will fill in some areas to make connections. There needs to
be tie in from trails to sidewalks and the other item will be land acquisition for the
southeast community regional park.
F Director Report - Eric Nuner, Assistant Parks and Recreation Director
Eric Nuner reviewed the report. Chad Holz asked if there has been a decrease in programming
and recreation center usage the last couple of weeks. Eric Nuner feels there has been a little
more hesitation on the indoor programming side but not on the membership side. Peter Bahrs
asked if the childcare will be coming back at the recreation center. Eric Nuner stated staff is
looking at this and are wanting to bring it back. They are looking at hours, staff pay and what
the fees would be.
Legislative Regular Agenda
G Consideration and possible action to recommend approval of the parkland dedication
proposal for the Heights at San Gabriel - Eric Nuner, Assistant Parks and Recreation Director
This proposed subdivision is located on Hwy 29 west of IH35. The property was recently
annexed into the City Limits. The subdivision has 267 proposed residential units which equates
to 3.3 acres of parkland (267 units / 80 unit per acre = 3.3). The park plan includes a 7.1 acre
private park. To receive private park credit, the private park must be at least 2 acres and have
at least 4 nonexclusive amenities which are open to the public. The park development
requirement is $267,000 (267 units x $1,000 per unit) of improvements of which credit will be
given for 50% for developer amenities. The developer's proposed park development plan
includes improved open space, picnic areas, a trail, a sport court and a playground and swings.
The developer is requesting 50% private park credit for both the land and the development fees.
Staff is supportive of this request as the private park satisfies the requirements in Section 13.08
of the UDC.
Eric Nuner had the presenters introduce themselves, Mark Baker SEC Planning, Chris with
Blackwell Homes, and Rachel with the development team. Eric Nuner explained the proposal.
Peter Bahrs asked what the hours would be for the park. Eric Nuner stated if they set hours for
the private park, they could set the hours it is open to the public, but he said generally the city
park hours are open 5 a.m. to 10 p.m. Mark Baker stated this a long linear piece of property that
is in between 2 subdivisions that has constraints but open space and amenity opportunity.
Lindsay Cooper asked since the pool is private would it be gated and have controlled access.
Mark Baker confirmed that it would be. Lindsay Cooper asked what the challenges are with the
Page 5 of 74
karst area. Eric Nuner stated karst areas are not areas the city wants to be responsible for. The
challenges with what can be done in and around the buffer zones you cannot do maintenance
within them and then it looks unkept and neighbors then call saying it needs to be mowed. We
then must educate them that we cannot do that. It’s a repetitive education process and we deal
with one of these in the Village neighborhood often. He stated there are no development
opportunities or anything that can be done from a maintenance standpoint. That is a significant
piece of this property. It put limitations on how the lot can be utilized as well. The compromise
was to make it private. Peter Bahrs asked if the picnic tables and courts would be first come
first serve. Mark Baker stated there would not be a reservation system. Eric Nuner stated that
typically in a neighborhood park it is first come first serve. Peter Bahrs asked if the
neighborhood is gated, and it was confirmed that it is not. Lindsay Cooper asked if it was
mixed use or single family. Mark Baker stated it is single family with 4 different lot sizes.
Jolene Melancon asked if this would eventually tie into the regional trail development. Eric
Nuner stated the trail development is unrelated to the parkland dedication; it’s separate in the
UDC. Peter Bahrs asked how many houses were in the neighborhood. Mark Baker stated there
are 267 homes. Peter Bahrs also asked how many parking spaces are at the park and Mark
Baker stated there are 20 parking spaces. Peter Bahrs asked to explain the financial aspect of the
parkland dedication. Eric Nuner explained the fees and the parkland dedication.
Motion made by Jolene Melancon, second by Lindsay Cooper to recommend approval of the
parkland dedication proposal for the Heights at San Gabriel. Approved 7 – 0
H Consideration and possible action to approve minutes from the July 8, 2021 meeting -
Jill Kellum, Administrative Supervisor
Motion made by Katherine Kainer, second by Chad Holz to approve minutes from the July 8,
2021 meeting. Approved 7 – 0
Adjournment
Adjourn - Katherine Kainer, Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Chair
Motion made by Katherine Kainer, second by Jack Flatau to adjourn the meeting. The
meeting adjourned at 7:21 p.m.
_____________________________________
Katherine Kainer, Board Chair
____________________________________
Lindsay Cooper, Secretary
Page 6 of 74
______________________________________
Jill Kellum, Board Liaison
Page 7 of 74
City of Georgetown, Texas
Parks and Rec Advisory Board
September 9, 2021
S UB J E C T:
P res entation by the G eorgetown Trails F oundation to build mountain bike trails parallel to the hike and bike
trails. -- Kimberly G arrett, P arks and R ecreation Director
IT E M S UMMARY:
T he G eorgetown Trails F oundation is a 501c3 organization that was formed to build mountain bike trails in
areas along the river c orridors and adjac ent to the hike and bike trails . Members of the organization will be
pres ent to give the board an overview of their plan and how they would like to enter into a parkland
maintenance agreement to build and maintain mountain bike trails on c ity parkland.
F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
na
S UB MIT T E D B Y:
Kimberly G arrett, P arks and R ec reation Direc tor
Page 8 of 74
City of Georgetown, Texas
Parks and Rec Advisory Board
September 9, 2021
S UB J E C T:
Dis cus s ion on the P arks and R ec reation Mas ter P lan S urvey R es ults -- Kimberly G arrett, P arks and
R ecreation Director
IT E M S UMMARY:
P arks Master P lan S urvey results were pres ented to the public on August 25. P res entation is attached for
dis cus s ion. T he recording of the video is saved on the project webs ite gtxparkplan.c om
F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
na
S UB MIT T E D B Y:
Kimberly G arrett, P arks and R ec reation Direc tor
AT TAC H ME N T S:
Description Type
Pres entation Pres entation
Page 9 of 74
Parks and
Recreation
Master Plan
Findings Presentation-Aug. 25, 2021
Page 10 of 74
Agenda
PLAN VISION PROJECT SCHEDULE COMMUNITY SURVEY
PROCESS AND KEY
FINDINGS
OUTDOOR
INVENTORY/LEVEL OF
SERVICE FINDINGS
INDOOR RECREATION
FINDINGS
NEXT STEPS QUESTION AND
ANSWERS
Page 11 of 74
The Georgetown Parks and Recreation
Master Plan will provide a vision to act as
a guide for the Department for the next
10 years.
The Plan will be community driven and
establish a clear direction to guide the
Department in the growth, development
and enhancement of the community’s
parks, public spaces, recreation
programs, services and facilities.
Plan
Vision
Page 12 of 74
The Plan
will:
use community engagement to create a clear 10-year
vision for the DepartmentUse
provide an action plan with concise and innovative
recommendations to achieve the visionProvide
update the inventory and analysis of indoor and
outdoor facilities to position Georgetown to build on
its unique charm and character
Update
maximize Department resources to further expand
recreation opportunities throughout the CityMaximize
become an element of the City’s 2030 Comprehensive
PlanBecome
meet the Texas Parks and Wildlife Master Plan
requirementsMeet
Page 13 of 74
Project Schedule
May 24
Public Meeting:
Virtual Project Kick-
off
June
Community Needs
Assessment Survey
Park Inventory and
Level of Service
Analysis
August
Public Meeting:
Findings
Presentation
September
Visioning
Workshop with
Project Team
Development of
Priorities and
Recommendations
November
Public Meeting:
Draft Presentation
December
Draft Plan posted
for two weeks of
public comment
January
Public Meeting:
Final Presentation
at Park Advisory
Board
Page 14 of 74
Community Survey
Process and
Key Findings
Page 15 of 74
Primary methods:
1 = Statistically Valid (Invitation Survey)
Mailed postcard and survey with an option to complete online through password
protected website
2 = Open Link Survey
Online survey available to all residents of Georgetown
491 -
1,545 -
Invitation Surveys Completed
+/-4.4%
Margin of Error
Open Link Surveys Completed
Total
Completed
Surveys
2,036
7
Methodology
3,840 Postcards & Surveys Delivered
Page 16 of 74
Demographics
Household area location.
8
Overall Invite Open
Zone 1: West of I-35/South
of Williams Dr
Zone 2: West of I-35/North of
Williams Dr
Zone 3: East of I-35/North of
Hwy 29
Zone 4: East of I-35/South of
Hwy 29
Don’t know
Other
n=
29%
39%
11%
17%
2%
2%
2,014
28%
36%
11%
24%
1%
0%
481
29%
40%
12%
15%
2%
2%
1,533
Q: Which Parkland Dedication Zone do you live in?
Page 17 of 74
Key Findings
9
NEEDS MET FACILITIES & SERVICES
In terms of facilities and services meeting
the needs of the community, respondents
felt the following are meeting the needs the
best:
•trails and pathways (4.0)
•amenities at parks (3.9)
•youth athletics (3.7)
•senior programs (3.7)
Skateboard parks and environmental
programs rated lower for invite and open
link respondents (3.2 and 3.1, respectively).
IMPORTANCE OF FACILITIES & SERVICES
On a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being very important,
resident households rated the following as most
important facilities to their household:
•amenities at parks (4.4)
•trails and pathways (4.3)
•parks and open spaces (4.2)
Most important programs and services:
•fitness programs (3.4)
•adult recreation programs (3.2)
•senior programs (3.2)
Page 18 of 74
INCREASE USE
If addressed what would increase parks
and recreation usage for invite
respondents:
•improved communication about offerings
•better lighting
•better maintenance
Open link:
•better lighting
•having facilities closer to where they live
Key Findings
10
A motor vehicle is the most used and
preferred method of transportation to parks
and recreation facilities.
TRANSPORTATION
Nearly three-quarters of invite respondents
(73%) would probably/definitely support more
private/public partnerships as potential funding
sources.
Positive support for bond referendums for
special projects also exists (59%).
FUNDING SOURCES
Page 19 of 74
FUTURE PROGRAM NEEDS
Most important need for the future programs
and services, invite:
•more after school and summer programs
(3.6) as the most important need for the
future.
Both invite and open link:
•more fitness/wellness/health programs
Key Findings
11
FUTURE FACILITY NEEDS
The most important items to focus on for facilities
and amenities in the future:
•adding trails in neighborhood parks and/or
connecting parks to city trail systems (4.2)
•acquiring land for new parks in underserved
areas (4.0)
•better maintenance follows at 3.8.FUTURE INDOOR
RECREATION CENTER
Gymnasium amenities are the most important
amenities for a new indoor recreation center.
The top two amenities are fitness areas with
weights and cardio equipment and group
exercise rooms.
Page 20 of 74
Current Usage
Page 21 of 74
Overall Invite Open
Trails
Restrooms
Open space
Picnic tables
Playscapes
Drinking fountains
Swimming pools
Exercise equipment
Splash pads
Dog park
Pavilions
Event space at San Gabriel Park
Fishing areas
Disc golf
Basketball courts
Pickleball courts
Rectangle athletic fields (e.g., soccer, football)
Tennis courts
Diamond athletic fields (e.g., baseball, softball)
Volleyball
n=
74%
73%
62%
50%
39%
39%
34%
32%
30%
28%
25%
20%
19%
15%
12%
12%
10%
9%
7%
6%
1,778
72%
74%
63%
56%
38%
37%
25%
27%
29%
32%
25%
21%
18%
15%
14%
5%
11%
6%
6%
7%
443
75%
73%
62%
48%
40%
39%
38%
33%
31%
27%
24%
19%
19%
16%
12%
14%
10%
10%
8%
6%
1,335
Q: Which of the following amenities does your household use when visiting Georgetown Parks & Recreation facilities?
(Check all that apply)
Amenities Usage
13
Trails, restrooms and open spaces are the most used amenities among both invite and open link respondents, followed by
picnic tables, playscapes, and drinking fountains.
Page 22 of 74
Current Conditions
Page 23 of 74
Importance of Current Facilities and Amenities
15
Overall Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4
Trails and pathways
Parks and open spaces
Amenities at parks (picnic areas, restrooms, etc.)
Recreation centers
Aquatic facilities (pools, splash pads, etc.)
Community gardens
Mountain bike trails
Dog parks
Rectangle athletic fields (soccer, football, etc.)
Diamond athletic fields (baseball, softball, etc.)
Tennis courts
Pickleball courts
Disc Golf
Basketball courts
Volleyball
Skateboard parks
4.5
4.4
4.4
3.8
3.5
3.0
2.8
2.8
2.5
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.2
2.2
2.1
1.9n=1,617
n=1,603
n=1,622
n=1,615
n=1,620
n=1,612
n=1,617
n=1,607
n=1,638
n=1,625
n=1,651
n=1,660
n=1,647
n=1,697
n=1,677
n=1,676 4.6
4.4
4.3
3.9
3.5
3.0
3.0
2.7
2.6
2.4
2.4
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.0n=422
n=416
n=423
n=420
n=419
n=425
n=422
n=418
n=427
n=420
n=428
n=429
n=428
n=433
n=434
n=430 4.3
4.3
4.3
3.7
3.3
2.9
2.5
2.6
2.3
2.2
2.2
2.4
2.0
2.0
1.9
1.7n=660
n=657
n=663
n=663
n=672
n=660
n=661
n=659
n=672
n=670
n=687
n=688
n=682
n=715
n=701
n=702 4.7
4.6
4.4
3.9
3.5
3.4
3.3
3.2
2.6
2.3
2.3
2.0
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.2n=184
n=183
n=183
n=182
n=180
n=181
n=181
n=184
n=184
n=185
n=184
n=185
n=185
n=188
n=185
n=184 4.5
4.5
4.6
3.8
3.8
3.1
3.0
2.9
2.7
2.5
2.3
2.0
2.4
2.3
2.2
2.1n=274
n=271
n=276
n=274
n=271
n=271
n=275
n=270
n=276
n=274
n=272
n=278
n=275
n=278
n=276
n=280
Q: How important are the following facilities and services to your household? (Facilities and Amenities)
Page 24 of 74
Rating Category Avg.n=
Percent Responding:
1 & 2 3 4 & 5
Trails and pathways 4.0 318
Amenities at parks (picnic areas, restrooms, etc.)3.9 336
Parks and open spaces 3.9 318
Diamond athletic fields (baseball, softball, etc.)3.9 187
Rectangle athletic fields (soccer, football, etc.)3.8 175
Dog parks 3.8 222
Recreation centers 3.7 266
Basketball courts 3.7 167
Tennis courts 3.5 146
Aquatic facilities (pools, splash pads, etc.)3.5 258
Disc Golf 3.5 171
Volleyball 3.4 132
Pickleball courts 3.4 132
Mountain bike trails 3.3 181
Community gardens 3.2 208
Skateboard parks 3.1 123
21%30%45%
22%26%47%
22%28%43%
29%34%31%
24%29%37%
28%29%35%
29%25%36%
35%23%35%
31%21%32%
28%21%32%
29%22%30%
44%15%31%
14%31%17%32%
34%34%
18%30%16%24%
14%15%34%15%23%
5%21%74%
5%22%73%
6%22%71%
6%29%66%
10%24%66%
9%28%63%
11%29%61%
8%35%58%
17%31%52%
19%28%53%
19%29%52%
11%44%46%
21%31%48%
20%34%46%
29%30%40%
28%34%38%
Q: How you think they are currently meeting the needs of the community (Facilities and Amenities) (Invite)
Needs Met of Current Facilities and Amenities
16
Invite respondents rated trails and pathways (4.0) as meeting the needs for facilities and amenities the best. Community
gardens and skateparks rated lowest at 3.2 and 3.1, respectively.
Page 25 of 74
Importance of Current Programs and Services
17
Overall Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4
Fitness programs
Adult recreation programs
Adult athletic programs
Youth athletics
Youth recreation programs
Youth camps
3.6
3.3
3.1
3.0
2.9
2.8n=1,620
n=1,627
n=1,628
n=1,640
n=1,645
n=1,657 3.6
3.4
3.2
3.0
2.9
2.8n=414
n=420
n=419
n=421
n=422
n=425 3.4
3.3
3.1
2.8
2.8
2.7n=670
n=672
n=672
n=679
n=686
n=691 3.8
3.5
3.2
3.0
3.0
2.8n=186
n=184
n=185
n=184
n=185
n=186 3.6
3.3
3.1
3.4
3.3
3.2n=271
n=271
n=274
n=277
n=274
n=274
Q: How important are the following facilities and services to your household? (Programs and Services)
Current programs and services differ based on household location. Zone 4 rated youth programs and services more
important than the other three zones.
Page 26 of 74
Rating Category Avg.n=
Percent Responding:
1 & 2 3 4 & 5
Youth athletics 3.7 152
Senior programs 3.7 174
Youth recreation programs 3.6 139
Fitness programs 3.6 204
Adult athletic programs 3.5 161
Adult recreation programs 3.5 177
Youth camps 3.5 132
Special events 3.5 162
Aquatic programs 3.4 171
Educational programs 3.3 147
Adaptive/special needs programs 3.3 106
Environmental programs 3.2 135
11%29%23%34%
11%31%26%29%
32%23%32%
7%33%21%34%
7%35%14%39%
12%36%17%32%
13%32%27%21%
11%34%19%31%
18%27%18%31%
17%34%17%26%
19%30%20%22%
14%12%32%16%26%
13%29%58%
13%31%55%
13%32%55%
12%33%55%
12%35%53%
15%36%49%
20%32%48%
16%34%49%
23%27%49%
23%34%43%
27%30%43%
26%32%42%
Q: How you think they are currently meeting the needs of the community (Programs and Services) (Invite)
Needs Met of Current Programs and Services
18
Invite respondents rated youth athletics (3.7) and senior programs (3.7) as meeting the needs for programs and services
the best. Environmental programs rated lowest at 3.2.
Page 27 of 74
Future Facilities /
Programs / Services
Page 28 of 74
Overall Invite Open
Add trails in parks and/or connect parks to city trail systems
Acquiring land for new parks in underserved areas
Better maintenance of existing parks and recreation facilities
Develop a new recreation center
More (playgrounds, sports courts, etc.) at existing parks
Develop a new indoor aquatic center
Developing outdoor event space
More pickleball courts
Developing outdoor, artificial turf fields (soccer, football, etc.)
Developing more diamond fields
33%
18%
24%
19%
15%
13%
20%
19%
12%
8%
8%
34%
20%
22%
21%
18%
18%
19%
16%
9%
9%
33%
18%
24%
18%
15%
15%
21%
18%
9%
70%
57%
42%
29%
25%
24%
16%
13%
5%
3%
65%
59%
46%
28%
30%
26%
18%
6%
8%
4%
72%
57%
40%
29%
23%
24%
15%
16%
4%
3%
Q: Which three facilities are the highest priorities to your household?
Top 3 Future Needs: Facilities
20 Page 29 of 74
Overall Invite Open
More fitness/wellness/health programs
More adult programs
More senior programs
Additional after-school and summer programs
More teen and youth programs
More special events
24%
12%
22%
17%
11%
26%
17%
16%
12%
17%
11%
20%
22%
12%
17%
12%
16%9%
22%
14%
19%
21%
12%
26%
14%
18%
14%
16%
12%
19%
20%
19%
15%
16%
9%
25%
11%
23%
14%
12%
25%
19%
15%
12%
17%
21%
22%
13%
16%
16%8%
70%
50%
49%
46%
40%
36%
67%
47%
45%
54%
41%
39%
71%
52%
51%
42%
40%
35%
Q: Which three programs and services are the highest priorities to your household?
Top 3 Future Needs: Programs & Services
21 Page 30 of 74
Financial Choices / Fees
Page 31 of 74
Rating Category Sample Avg.n=
Percent Responding:
1 & 2 3 4 & 5
More private/public partnerships
Invite 4.0 410
Open 4.0 870
Bond referendum for specific projects
Invite 3.5 420
Open 3.7 883
Increased user fees
Invite 3.1 431
Open 3.2 909
18%46%27%
18%41%33%
20%25%34%
9%18%29%35%
15%31%35%
18%27%13%32%
9%18%73%
8%18%74%
20%20%59%
18%18%64%
26%31%43%
28%27%45%
Q: Please indicate how strongly you support a moderate increase of each of the following potential funding sources.
Funding Support
23
Nearly three-quarters of respondents probably or would definitely support more private/public partnerships as potential
funding sources. Positive support for bond referendums for specific projects also exists among invite and open link
respondents. An increase in user fees is less supported; however, it still has positive support.
Page 32 of 74
Outdoor
Inventory/Level of
Service Findings
Page 33 of 74
The
Georgetown
System
Page 34 of 74
Inventory
Site Visits
•Overall parks are in good condition and well maintained
•Signage consistent across system
•Some access and ADA issues
•Some plastic curb walls at playgrounds limit access
•Turf conditions vary
•Limited or no open used diamonds or rectangles in the system
•Numerous undeveloped or underdeveloped properties limit level of
service in some areas
•Limited walkable access across the system
Page 35 of 74
Alternative Recreation
Providers and
Opportunities-Public
Lake Georgetown
•US Army Corps of Engineers
•Cedar Breaks Park, Overlook Park, Jim Hogg Park, Russell Park
•Fishing, Hunting (drawn hunt), Camping, Boating, Hiking, Picnicking
Granger Lake
•USACE
•Friendship Park, Wilson H Fox park, Taylor Park, Willis Creek Park
•Fishing, Hunting, Camping, Boating, Hiking, Picnicking
Berry Springs Park and Preserve
•Williamson County, 300 acres
•Fishing, Camping, Boating, Hiking, Picnicking
Twin Springs Preserve
•Williamson County, 170 acres
•Hiking
Georgetown ISD
•Middle Schools and Elementary Schools
•Facility access when school not in sessionPage 36 of 74
Alternative Recreation
Providers and
Opportunities-Private
Sun City
•Sun City Community Association
•Substantial amenities: golf courses, fitness centers, swimming
pools, tennis courts, pickle ball courts, bocce courts, table
tennis, shuffleboard, horseshoe and washer pits, billiards
center, dog park, nature trails, fishing ponds, fishing pots,
woodshop, arts & craft center, and library
•Restricted to residents & guests only
HOAs
•Older developments include community pool and playgrounds
•Newer developments include community pools, playgrounds,
sports courts, picnic/pavilion structures, and trails
MUDs
•No current park facilities
•Saddle Creek and Fairhaven playgrounds and amenity centers are
located on land owned by the community association/HOA
•Trail connections are present within MUD property
Private Clubs/Golf
•Georgetown Country Club and Berry Creek Country Club
•All 5 golf courses within City limits are restricted to
members/residentsPage 37 of 74
Trails Network
Page 38 of 74
Trails Breakdown by
Ownership
City of Georgetown
•Mix of paved multi-use and decomposed granite paths
•19.9 miles of total trails, 7.1 miles of multi-use trail along San Gabriel
•Horse trails located at Garey Park, account for 8.3 miles of total trails
USACE
•Mix of paved multi-use paths and unpaved nature/single track trails
•33.65 miles of total trails
Williamson County
•Mix of paved multi-use paths and unpaved walking trails
•11.5 miles of total trails
Wolf Ranch
•Paved multi-use path along river
•2.7 miles of total trails, .9 miles of multi-use trail along San Gabriel
Sun City
•Un-paved nature trails
•14.1 miles of total trails
Page 39 of 74
Mapping
Location and
Quality of
Components
Page 40 of 74
Sort for things
such as
basketball courts
Park / Location Component Quantity
Neighborhood
Score
Berry Creek Park Basketball Court 1 2
Chautauqua Park Basketball Court 1 2
Pinnacle Park Basketball Court 1 2
San Jose Park And Splash Pad Basketball Court 1 2
Williams Drive Pool And Park Basketball Court 1 2
San Gabriel Park Basketball Court 1 2
La Conterra North Park Basketball Court 1 2
Kelley Park Basketball, Practice 1 2
Rowan Park Basketball, Practice 1 2
McMaster Athletic Complex Basketball, Practice 2 1
Stillwater Park Basketball, Practice 1 2
Page 41 of 74
Park/Facility
Score
Park / Location
GRASP®
Score Park / Location
GRASP®
Score
San Gabriel Park 378 Geneva Park 18
Garey Park 226 Katy Crossing Park 18
McMaster Athletic Complex 182 Madrone Park 17
Tennis Center 127 Pinnacle Park 17
Chautauqua Park 55 River Ridge Pool and Park 15
VFW Park 55 University Park 15
Rowan Park 40 Downtown Splash Pad 14
Emerald Springs Park 36 Fairfield Park 13
San Jose Park And Splash Pad 36 Bark Park 12
Blue Hole Park 34 Edwards Park 12
Rabbit Hill Park and Splash Pad 34 Kelley Park 12
Rivery Park 34 Summer Crest Park 11
Stillwater Park 34 Heritage Gardens Park 10
Golden Bear Park 32 Cedar Elm Park 9
Lakeside Park 31 Green Grove Park 9
Chandler Park 29 Hanover Park 9
Meadows Park 29 Spring Court Park 9
Bootys Road Park 26 Summers Green Park 9
La Conterra North Park 24 Adkins Park 7
Old Town Park 24 Bedford Park 6
Village Pool and Park 22 Raintree Park 6
Woodlake Park 20 Chestnut Park 4
Berry Creek Park 19 Shell Park 4
Founders Park 19 Village Glen Park 4
Williams Drive Pool And Park 19 Westbury Park 4
Creekside Park 18 Windridge Village Park 3
Page 42 of 74
Comparisons
(National Dataset)
Top 10%
of all
park
scores
Components,Agencies,Parks
Top 100
of all
park
scores
Page 43 of 74
GRASP® Benchmarking
(With Comparable Population 75,000 and other Texas Communities)
Georgetown tends towards top in total parks, parks per capita, and components per capita
Angleton,TX –1 .2
Frederick,MD –1 .1
Pearland TX –1 .0
Grand Junction,CO –0 .8
Bloomington,IL –0 .5
Perris,CA –0 .3
Tamarac,FL –0 .2Parkper1,ooo People
Average Score Per Location
Pearland TX –74
Tamarac,FL –42
Bloomington,IL –36
Grand Junction,CO –34
Angleton,TX –33
Perris,CA –31
Frederick,MD –21
Components/1 k Pop
Angleton,TX –5
Frederick,MD –5
Grand Junction,CO –5
Pearland TX –2
Bloomington,IL –4
Perris,CA –2
Tamarac,FL –2Total Locations
Frederick,MD –85
Grand Junction,CO –53
Bloomington,IL –42
Perris,CA -26
Pearland,TX –21
Tamarac,FL –15
Angleton,TX –13
Components Per Location
Angleton,TX –8
Pearland TX –8
Bloomington,IL –7
Tamarac,FL –7
Grand Junction,CO –6
Perris,CA –6
Frederick,MD –4
Page 44 of 74
NRPA 2020 Park Metrics
(With comparable Population 50,000 to 99,999)
Outdoor Facility
Agencies
Offering this
Facility
Median
Number of
Residents
per Facility
Georgetown
Residents
per Facility
Georgetow
n Current
Quantity
Need to add
to meet
current
median
Need to add
with
population
growth
Residents Per Park NA 2,523 1,412 52 parks*
Acres of Park Land per 1,000 Residents NA 7.7 13.7 1006 acres
Basketball courts 86.5 8,557 10,489 7 2 2
Community gardens 47.2 50,000 73,425 1 1 1
Diamond fields: baseball - adult 52.8 22,876 -12 -12
Diamond fields: baseball - youth 78.3 7,222 -5 -4
Diamond fields: softball fields - adult 64.8 15,500 -10 -10
Diamond fields: softball fields – youth 59 12,000 -9 -8
Dog park 62.9 58,000 36,713 2 -1 -1
Playgrounds 93.9 3,859 2,040 36 -17 -15
Rectangular fields: football field 37.2 32,420 -3 -3
Rectangular fields: multi-purpose 64.5 10,467 2 3
Rectangular fields: soccer field - adult 40.7 16,644 -1 0
Rectangular fields: soccer field – youth 46.9 9,085 3 4
Skate park 38.2 62,567 73,425 1 0 0
Tennis courts (outdoor only) 81.1 6,242 9,178 8 5 5
Possible Deficit
2020 NRPA Agency Performance Review: Park and Recreation Agency Performance Benchmarks
Outdoor Park and Recreation Facilities
Comparison based on median for 50,000 to 99,999 population comparison
Surplus
154,895
14,685 5
*52 developed parks (22 undeveloped)
Page 45 of 74
Pedestrian
Zones
Page 46 of 74
GRASP®
Walkable Access
Page 47 of 74
Walkable
Access
Comparisons
Page 48 of 74
GRASP®
Walkable Target
Page 49 of 74
GRASP®
Walkable
Access
Page 50 of 74
GRASP®
Neighborhood
Access
Page 51 of 74
GRASP®
Neighborhood
Access
Page 52 of 74
Indoor Recreation
Findings
Page 53 of 74
The City of Georgetown, with an estimated 2021 population of 74,198
as reported by Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI), has
one recreation center totaling approximately 67,900 square feet.
Georgetown’s single indoor recreation facility offer amenities widely
accepted as “full service” recreation center components: drop-in
fitness area, indoor aquatics space, community meeting space and
programmed activities for residents across the spectrum of ages.
INDOOR RECREATION FINDINGS
Environmental Systems Research Institute
Page 54 of 74
INDOOR RECREATION FINDINGS
RECREATION CENTER MARKET ANALYSIS
Existing Georgetown Recreation Center
10-minute drive time boundary
Population within 10-minute drive time
59,427 (2021) / 69,114 (2025)
Page 55 of 74
INDOOR RECREATION FINDINGS
EXISTING RECREATION CENTER
Existing Georgetown Recreation Center
15-minute drive time boundary
Population within 15-minute drive time
179,488 (2021) / 206,222 (2025)
Page 56 of 74
Benchmark cities were selected to understand how peer cities compare to
Georgetown indoor recreation offerings.
Cities were selected based on their similarities to Georgetown with regards to
population size, growing base of young families and average home values:
Round Rock and Cedar Park are neighboring communities. New Braunfels being South of
the Austin Metro Area has an influx of retirees, along with young families. Allen and
Mansfield are within the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex with similar growth patterns as
Georgetown.
This comparison indicates on average benchmark cities will see a 14% increase in
population 2021-2026. Georgetown will see a 17% increase over the five-year
period.
INDOOR RECREATION FINDINGS BENCHMARK CITIES
Page 57 of 74
Benchmark City 2021
Total Sq/Ft Public
Indoor Recreation
Opportunities (RC,
CC, SC, AqC)
ESRI
Population
2021
Sq/Ft per
Capita
Allen 95,756 110,145 0.87
Cedar Park 54,000 77,381 0.70
New Braunfels 92,300 96,205 0.96
Round Rock 83,000 125,007 0.66
Mansfield 21,700 76,597 0.28
Average level of service 0.69
Georgetown 67,900 74,198 0.92
INDOOR RECREATION FINDINGS BENCHMARK CITIES
CURRENT INDOOR RECREATION LEVEL
OF SERVICE
FUTURE INDOOR RECREATION LEVEL OF SERVICE
Level of Service Observations
0.92 SF per capita is the Georgetown current level of service compared to an average .69 SF level of service of the benchmark cities
Each of these cities is experiencing unprecedented population growth which they are planning or proposing new indoor recreation offerings
to meet the demand making the new level of service double in the next 5 years to 1.33 Sq/Ft per Capita
BRS has found that many of the benchmark cities have new indoor recreation facilities under construction or have plans for new facilities in
the next 5 years
Benchmark City 2026
*Planned or
Proposed
Total Sq/Ft Public
Indoor Recreation
Opportunities (RC,
CC, SC, AqC)
ESRI
Population
2026
Sq/Ft per
Capita
*Allen 244,750 123,322 1.98
Cedar Park 54,000 89,234 0.61
New Braunfels 92,300 111,274 0.83
*Round Rock 263,000 141,613 1.86
*Mansfield 121,000 86,754 1.39
Average level of service 1.33
Georgetown 67,900 87,094 0.78
* Cities of Round Rock and Mansfield are in the early stages of future indoor recreation planning and could increase or decrease as plans are adopted in 2021.
Page 58 of 74
EXISTING GEORGETOWN RECREATION CENTER ARCHITECTURE & PROGRAM ASSESSMENT
The Georgetown Recreation Center was built in 1995, with an addition completed in
2009
An assessment of the existing recreation center physical conditions and intended use
was conducted using the following evaluation criteria:
ASSESSMENT OF PHYSICAL CONDITIONS
New or like-new condition
Good condition-limited signs of wear or damage
Average condition for building age
Near end of anticipated lifecycle
Very worn or damaged
ASSESSMENT OF INTENDED USE
Space size/configuration meets the requirements of the desired use or purpose
Space size/configuration functions, but limits the desired use or purpose
Space size/configuration does not permit desired use or purpose
Page 59 of 74
INDOOR RECREATION FINDINGS EXISTING FACILITY ASSESSMENT
FRONT DESK
LOBBYPage 60 of 74
INDOOR RECREATION FINDINGS EXISTING FACILITY ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT OF PHYSICAL CONDITIONS
1.Existing Building Envelope: Average condition for building age
2.Existing Interior Building Condition: Average condition for building age
ASSESSMENT OF INTENDED USE
1.Space size/configuration functions, but limits the desired use or purpose
Adult Fitness, Child Watch and Gymnasium spaces –not large enough for demand
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment –showing age; interior renovation
Wayfinding –could use upgrade
Lobby –security and control access limited due to orientation of front desk
2.Space size/configuration does not permit desired use or purpose
Technology –especially in fitness areas and potential Esports program; Sound system for entire facility inadequate
Staff & Support spaces –lack of staff office space
Storage –needs to support multi-purpose programs; overall building support
Two entries –inefficient; labor intensive
Senior & Teen Space –needs dedicated space for each. Facilities not available to seniors when summer camp is in operation.
Bus Drop off –inadequate
Parking –inadequate
Page 61 of 74
Findings summary
The indoor recreation market is strong in the Georgetown service area
The existing level of service is changing rapidly due to increase in population
The existing facility is in average condition for its age
The existing facility appearance is becoming outdated
Existing recreation center is a candidate for renovation and expansion to contribute to the indoor recreation system wide demands
Georgetown indoor recreation level of service demands indicate there is a gap in the system that will likely exceed the existing recreation center program supply
Public input indicates that a new recreation center is needed with the following main components
Gymnasium amenities are the most important for a new indoor recreation center
Other top amenities are fitness areas with weights and cardio equipment and group exercise rooms
Best practices call for a new multi-generational recreation center to balance the system wide needs and provide year-round services to seniors.
INDOOR RECREATION FINDINGS SUMMARY
Page 62 of 74
Next Steps
Page 63 of 74
Questions,
comments, or
feedback?
Page 64 of 74
Thank you
Page 65 of 74
City of Georgetown, Texas
Parks and Rec Advisory Board
September 9, 2021
S UB J E C T:
P res entation and disc ussion on the committed regional trail segments along the S outh S an G abriel R iver. --
Kimberly G arrett, P arks and R ec reation Direc tor
IT E M S UMMARY:
S taff will go over the attac hed map showing the segments of the S outh S an G abriel R iver Trail that are
committed by developers.
F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
NA
S UB MIT T E D B Y:
Kimberly G arrett, P arks and R ec reation Direc tor
AT TAC H ME N T S:
Description Type
South San Gabriel River Trail Map Exhibit
Page 66 of 74
Page 67 of 74
City of Georgetown, Texas
Parks and Rec Advisory Board
September 9, 2021
S UB J E C T:
Director R eport - Kimberly G arrett, P arks and R ecreation Director
IT E M S UMMARY:
Director R eport is attached. S tatistics report will be sent at a later date due to the timing of the 1st of the
month and when the agenda pos ting was due.
F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
NA
S UB MIT T E D B Y:
Kimberly G arrett, P arks and R ec reation Direc tor
AT TAC H ME N T S:
Description Type
Monthly report Backup Material
Page 68 of 74
Director’s Monthly Report
Parks and Recreation
September 2021
Highlights
Master Plan Survey results were presented to the public on August 25th at the City Council
Chambers. We had 4 citizens attend in person and 30 attend via the Zoom session with 5 staff
and 25 citizens. At the presentation, GreenPlay and the sub consultants presented survey
results. The video and presentation have been uploaded to the project website.
At the September 14th City Council meeting, Facility Use Agreements with GTX Swim,
Georgetown Summer Swim Association, and Texas Gold Swimming will be going for approval.
These agreements are for use of Williams Drive Pool, Village Pool and the Recreation Center
Indoor Pool. In addition, an Interlocal Agreement with Georgetown Independent School District
for use of the Williams Drive Pool, Village Pool, Recreation Center Indoor Pool, and the
Recreation Center Event Room for the high school swim teams will also be presented to the City
Council. These agreements have all been prepared by our legal department and signed off by
the organizations. It was determined that these agreements need to only be approved by City
Council since they are legal documents, and any changes would require further legal review.
K-9 Kerplunk is scheduled for September 18th. As of September 1st, there were already 90 dogs
signed up. We are limited to 100 dogs to help keep event under control at the splash pad.
Tree adoption is planned for Nov. 6th to celebrate Texas Arbor Day. Pre-registration to adopt a
free tree will be required.
Garey Park hosted a cross country meet on Saturday, August 28th. There were 230 runners and
it was successful for the first time to host a meet.
The Parks maintenance staff managed the removal of 5 Shumard Oak trees and 1 crepe myrtle
tree around the square on Aug. 31. The trees were damaged from the winter storm and were
dying. Four of the trees will be replaced and their adjoining flower beds upgraded.
Electronic liability waiver forms were approved by the legal department. Staff has created a SOP
to help with the transition of moving from paper to electronic format and look forward to
implementing the new process.
The five pieces of weight equipment that were ordered in July for the fitness room at the
recreation center are scheduled to be delivered mid October.
There is a performance management dashboard on the City website. The Recreation’s customer
satisfaction performance dashboard is featured. https://georgetown.org/pmp/
Youth soccer registration has ended. There were 682 youth that signed up for the league.
The Tennis Center will transition to fall and spring hours as of September 1st. The facility will
close at 8 pm instead of 9 pm.
The locker rooms in the rec center will be closed for maintenance September 3-11th. The
facilities department will be doing ceiling tile replacement work. Also, Sept 8 thru 14th Gym #1
will be closed for maintenance of the gym floor. They will be applying a new coat of finish to the
gym floor and be touching up some of the court lines that are showing wear.
The Userful Public computers that were in the Teen Center have been removed. These are the
same type of public computers that are in the Georgetown Library. They were due for
Page 69 of 74
replacement and were being underutilized. Staff recommenced they be removed so the space
can be better used for other programming needs.
The aquatics team is short staffed for daytime lifeguards due to school being back in session. All
available full time aquatic staff are helping lifeguard.
Aquatics:
Pools close for the season on Labor Day
Pool numbers cumulative through August 31st
Pool Admission Revenue Paid Attendance Pool Pass Attendance
*Williams $17,373 7,666 1,736
Village $5,805 2,625 898
Outdoor Play Pool $10,962 3,783 1,652
River Ridge $1,256 553 61
*Williams Drive numbers provided prior to Labor Day weekend.
Staff Kudos
Staff received an email on 8/30/21- Just wanted to drop and line and say how incredible your
team is at parks and rec! Have had nothing but great experiences in the past, but today was
exceptional! The Rabbit Hill splashpad was malfunctioning. Called the number to report it. The
lady that answered the phone was genuinely apologetic and said someone would be out there
right away. She was right! From call to fixed was maybe 15 minutes and my little girl was able to
finish our splash pad day. Thank you for continuing to make the quality of life in Georgetown
that much better!
Page 70 of 74
City of Georgetown, Texas
Parks and Rec Advisory Board
September 9, 2021
S UB J E C T:
C apital P roject Updates - Eric Nuner, As s is tant P arks and R ecreation Director
IT E M S UMMARY:
F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
N/A
S UB MIT T E D B Y:
Eric Nuner, As s is tant Director of P arks and R ecreation
AT TAC H ME N T S:
Description Type
Project Updates Cover Memo
Page 71 of 74
Parks and Recreation
Capital Improvement Projects – September 2021
ADA Trail Reconstruction – The project began in early July and is scheduled for completion by the end of
September. The project scope will replace non-compliant sections of trail from Chandler Park to just
west of the Interstate 35 bridge. Work has been completed up to the Rivery Blvd. bridge overpass. The
project is on schedule.
Heritage Gardens (Community Garden) – Plans have been approved and staff is scheduling
construction. The prefabricated restroom and shelter are ordered. Site demolition has started, and
bidding has been sent out for site layout, grading, concrete work and fencing.
University Park – Staff has begun the planning process for redevelopment of University Park to include
playground replacement, landscape improvements and additional site amenities. A survey was sent to
neighborhood. A neighborhood public meeting will be scheduled to discuss the survey results in
September and determine final elements of the design.
Page 72 of 74
Wolf Crossing Trail – 90% drawings have been submitted to park staff for review. Parks staff and
consultants are working out final easement agreements with landowners for trail right of way. Bid
schedules have not been determined to date. The project continues to move forward.
Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Update – The Master Plan kick off meeting was held on April
20th. There were 5 Stakeholder Meetings scheduled between May 12 -19. A virtual public project kick-
off meeting was held on May 24 and the survey findings presentation was held on August 25. The
recorded presentation can be viewed at gtxparksplan.com. The next phase will include development of
priorities and recommendations.
Page 73 of 74
City of Georgetown, Texas
Parks and Rec Advisory Board
September 9, 2021
S UB J E C T:
Dis cus s ion to s et a time and a date for the P arks and R ecreation Advis ory Board park tour. - Kimberly
G arrett
IT E M S UMMARY:
F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
N/A
S UB MIT T E D B Y:
Kimberly G arrett, P arks and R ec reation Direc tor
Page 74 of 74