Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda_GTEC_09.17.2014Notice of Meeting for the Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corp and the Governing Body of the City of Georgetown September 17, 2014 at 3:30 PM at GMC, 300-1 Industrial Ave, Georgetown, Texas 78626 The City of Georgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If you require assistance in participating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the ADA, reasonable assistance, adaptations, or accommodations will be provided upon request. Please contact the City at least four (4) days prior to the scheduled meeting date, at (512) 930-3652 or City Hall at 113 East 8th Street for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. Regular Session (This Regular Session may, at any time, be recessed to convene an Executive Session for any purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code 551.) A Call to Order The Board may, at any time, recess the Regular Session to convene in Executive Session at the request of the Chair, a Board Member, the City Manager, Assistant City Manager, General Manager of Utilities, City Council Member, or legal counsel for any purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code Chapter 551, and are subject to action in the Regular Session that follows. B Introduction of Visitors C Industry/CAMPO/TXDOT Updates D Discussion regarding the Project Progress Reports and Time Lines. – Bill Dryden, P.E., Transportation Engineer, and Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Transportation Services Director. E Presentation of Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation monthly financial report for August 2014. Micki Rundell, Chief Financial Officer, COG, Finance Manager GTEC Legislative Regular Agenda F Consideration and possible action to approve minutes from the regular GTEC Board meeting held August 20, 2014. Paul E. Brandenburg, General Manager - GTEC G Consideration and possible action to approve Task Order KPA-15-001 with Kasberg, Patrick & Associates, LP, of Georgetown, Texas, for professional engineering services related to the final engineering design for construction plans, specifications and estimate and for rights-of-way acquisition services for the Rivery Boulevard Extension from Williams Drive to Northwest Boulevard in the amount of $706,110.00. – Bill Dryden, P.E., Transportation Engineer and Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Transportation Services Director. H Consideration and possible action to initiate the finding process for the Pecan Center economic development project that will include street improvements at the Airport Road/Lakeway Drive intersection, along Airport Road and an internal collector (Pecan Center Drive) that will eventually connect to Aviation Drive. – Edward G. Polasek, AICP Transportation Services Director and Micki Rundell, CFO. I Consideration and possible action to develop the Mays Street (Rabbit Hill Road) extension project extension as part of the South Georgetown Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone –Edward G. Polasek, AICP Transportation Services Director and Micki Rundell, Chief Financial Officer. Adjournment CERTIFICATE OF POSTING I, Jessica Brettle, City Secretary for the City of Georgetown, Texas, do hereby certify that this Notice of Meeting was posted at City Hall, 113 E. 8th Street, a place readily accessible to the general public at all times, on the ______ day of __________________, 2014, at __________, and remained so posted for at least 72 continuous hours preceding the scheduled time of said meeting. ____________________________________ Jessica Brettle, City Secretary City of Georgetown, Texas SUBJECT: Call to Order The Board may, at any time, recess the Regular Session to convene in Executive Session at the request of the Chair, a Board Member, the City Manager, Assistant City Manager, General Manager of Utilities, City Council Member, or legal counsel for any purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code Chapter 551, and are subject to action in the Regular Session that follows. ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: n/a SUBMITTED BY: Jana Kern City of Georgetown, Texas SUBJECT: Introduction of Visitors ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: n/a SUBMITTED BY: Jana Kern City of Georgetown, Texas SUBJECT: Industry/CAMPO/TXDOT Updates ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: n/a SUBMITTED BY: Jana Kern City of Georgetown, Texas SUBJECT: Discussion regarding the Project Progress Reports and Time Lines. – Bill Dryden, P.E., Transportation Engineer, and Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Transportation Services Director. ITEM SUMMARY: GTEC Projects FM 1460 ROW & Utility Relocations – Project No. 5RB Mays Street Extension (Teravista Parkway to Westinghouse Road) – Project No. 5RI NB Frontage Road (RM 2338 to Lakeway Dr.) – Project No. 5QY Northwest Blvd Overpass – Project No. 5QX Snead Drive – Project 5QZ Southwest Bypass – Project No. 5QC Wolf Ranch Pkwy Extension – Project No. 5QW GTEC Project Update & Status Report GTAB Projects Austin Avenue Bridge Evaluation and Repairs FM 971 Realignment at Austin Avenue FM 971 Improvements in San Gabriel Park FM 1460 Improvements Project MS4 Permit Update N Austin Avenue Sidewalk Improvements Shell Road at Westbury-Bellaire - Signal Improvements Sidewalk Master Plan Smith Branch Southeast Inner Loop Corridor Study Southwest Bypass Project (TIP #14C) Transit Study as Requested by City Council Transportation Services Operations – CIP Maintenance FINANCIAL IMPACT: None SUBMITTED BY: Bill Dryden, P.E., Transportation Engineer ATTACHMENTS: Description Type GTEC Project Updates Exhibit GTEC Project Status Report Exhibit GTAB Project Updates Exhibit FM 1460  (Quail Valley Drive to University Drive)  Project No. 5RB     TIP No. EEa, EEb & EEc  Rights‐of‐Way Acquisition and Utility Relocation  September 2014  Project Description Acquisition of ROW and relocation of utilities for the FM 1460 Project (Quail Valley Drive  to University Drive).  Purpose To have all ROWs cleared and utilities prior to TxDOT letting the project foe construction.  Project Managers Ed Polasek, AICP and Bill Dryden, P.E.  Engineer Brown and Gay Engineers, Inc.    Element Status / Issues  Design Final PS&E was submitted to TxDOT May 5th.  Environmental/  Archeological  Environmental approved with Project Schematic.  Rights of Way    All appraisals are complete.  Final offers  have been made for all ROW parcels.    The paperwork has been filed for all  parcels requiring condemnation.  Section:  North South  Acquired:  29 8  Pending:  5 ‐  Condemnation:  2 ‐  Total:  36 8  Utility Relocations Ongoing as ROW is being acquired.  Construction Bid were received by TxDOT in August 2014;   Construction scheduled to begin in February 2015.  Other Issues None pending.    Current Capital Improvement Projects TIP No. Project No. Update On Schedule/ Or Behind Project Budget Project Cost Available Current Year Projected Current Year Cost Current Year Available Lakeway Drive Overpass #10 5QL Project Complete. One ROW parcel has remaining issues. Complete 2,500,000 2,500,000 0 0 0 Southeast Arterial 1 (Sam Houston Avenue) #12 5QG Project Complete. One ROW parcel has remaining issues. Complete 12,995,625 10,478,499 2,517,126 0 0 Wolf Ranch Parkway Extension (SW Bypass to DB Wood Road) #14A 5QW Engineer is completing the fencing plans, its required environmental clearance documents (to determine the fee for WCCF) and the construction PS&E bidding package. ROW has been acquired. On Schedule Unchanged 1,330,000 1,111,233 218,767 283,350 0 283,350 Southwest Bypass (SH29 to RR2243)#14B 5QC Engineer has completed the project PS&E, less construction contract documents and environmental permitting required at time of actual construction. We have reached agreement with the representative of the Guy/Knight properties. ROW Acquisition process moving to condemnation for the Weir Trust properties. Appraisals have been updated. Wolf property – Acquisition complete. On Schedule Unchanged 7,756,432 3,225,132 4,531,300 4,539,107 5,787 4,533,320 Northwest Blvd Overpass #QQ 5QX Engineer has presented the Preliminary Engineering Report and has begun final PS&E design efforts. Engineer is developing ROW strip map and individual parcel plats and documents. In-process Unchanged 1,136,178 1,099,076 37,102 571,178 479,588 91,590 NB Frontage Road (2338 to Lakeway)#QQ 5QY Staff and Engineer has met with TxDOT personnel at both the local Area Office and District Environmental Division. In-process Unchanged 613,822 613,822 0 382,822 382,822 0 ROW - 1460 #EEa #EEb #EEc 5RB Bid were received by TxDOT in August 2014; Construction scheduled to begin in February 2015. Utility coordination on-going as ROW is acquired. All appraisals are complete. Final offers have been made for all ROW parcels. The paperwork has been filed for all parcels requiring condemnation. 29 of 36 Parcels have been acquired; 5 pending; 2 scheduled for condemnation. On Schedule 11,788,230 5,348,470 6,439,760 6,727,539 2,315,896 4,411,643 TCS/RR Easement 5RD Complete 1,500,000 1,503,148 -3,148 0 0 FM 971 / Washam 5RE GTEC Portion complete Complete 100,000 0 100,000 0 0 Rivery Road 5RF Alignment adopted by Council. Complete 779,000 29,000 750,000 750,000 0 750,000 Snead Drive 5QZ PS&E is basically complete; awaiting ROW for water quality pond. On Schedule 825,100 87,000 738,100 825,100 87,000 738,100 Mays Street Extension 5RI Engineering obtaining rights-of-entry for surveying and geotechnical investigations; beginning schematic design On Schedule 196,000 196,000 0 196,000 196,000 0 IH 35/ Hwy 29 Intersection 5RJ 650,000 0 650,000 650,000 0 650,000 Current Economic Development Projects Project Type Update On Schedule/ Or Behind Project Budget Project Cost Available Current Year Budget Current Year Cost Current Year Available Economic Development Projects 1,137,500 1,137,500 1,137,500 0 1,137,500 16,062,596 3,467,093 12,595,503 Project to Date Current Year Budget (13/14) GTEC PROJECT UPDATE AND STATUS REPORT September 2014 Project to Date Current Year Budget (13/14) L:\Global\CIP Agenda Form\GTEC Status Report\2014\GTEC - Project Status - 2014-09.xlsx Page 1 of 1 9/12/2014 Austin Avenue – Bridge Evaluations   (North and South San Gabriel Rivers)  Project No. TBD     TIP Project No. N/A  September 2014  Unchanged  Project  Description    Evaluate the repairs necessary to restore full structural capacity to the Austin Avenue  bridges over the North and South San Gabriel Rivers.  The process will involve several  phases – I) determination of testing needed, II) structural testing, analyses and  evaluation of test data to determine/recommend corrective measures and a project  budget, III) develop construction plans, specifications and contract documents, estimates  of probable construction costs and, last, IV) construction administration.  Purpose To extend the structural life of the two bridge and provide long‐term vehicular capacity  and pedestrian safety along Austin Avenue.  Project Manager Bill Dryden, P.E.  Engineer Aguirre & Fields, LP    North San Gabriel River Bridge South San Gabriel River Bridge    Element Status / Issues  Design Staff met with Engineer and discussed potential courses of action.  There are four basic  paths to consider:  Do Nothing.  Short Term Temporary Fix.  Medium Term Fix.  Replace  Structure.  Surveying  N/A (TBD)  Environmental/  Archeological  TBD during Phase II  Rights of Way Existing  Utility  Relocations  TBD (future)  Construction TBD  Other Issues Candidate project for May 2015 Bond Program election  Project submitted for CAMPO funding    FM 971 at Austin Avenue  Realignment Intersection Improvements  Project No. 1BZ     TIP No. QQ1  September 2014  Unchanged  Project Description Design and preparation of final plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E) for the widening  and realignment of FM 971 at Austin Avenue, eastward to Gann Street.  Purpose To provide a new alignment consistent with the alignment of the proposed Northwest  Boulevard Bridge over IH 35; to allow a feasible, alternate route from the west side go IH 35  to Austin Avenue, to Georgetown High School and a more direct route to SH 130.  Project Managers Bill Dryden, P.E.  Engineer Klotz Associates, Inc.    Element Status / Issues  Design Preliminary Engineering complete;   Engineer working on 60% design submittal  Environmental/  Archeological  10/2015  Rights of Way Complete  Utility Relocations TBD  Construction 10/2016  Other Issues Working with TxDOT to develop an Advance Funding Agreement for plans review  and construction administration.    FM 971 at Austin Avenue  Improvements in San Gabriel Park  Project No. 1BZ     TIP No. QQ1  September 2014  Unchanged  Project Description Design of final plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E) for the moving of all park  amenities from the new FM 971 ROW.  Purpose To clear the ROW of park amenities and allow TxDOT review of the PS&E. Project Managers Bill Dryden, P.E.  Engineer Klotz Associates, Inc.    Element Status / Issues  Design Complete  Environmental/  Archeological  N/A  Rights of Way Complete  Utility Relocations Complete  Construction Ongoing  Other Issues None    FM 1460  Quail Valley Drive to University Drive  Project No. 5RB     TIP No. EEa, EEb & EEc  September 2014  Project Description Design and preparation of plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E) for the widening and  reconstruction of FM 1460.  Project will include review and update to existing Schematic,  Right‐of‐Way Map and Environmental Document and completion of the PS&E for the  remaining existing roadway.  Purpose To keep the currently approved environmental documents active; purchase ROW, effect  utility relocations/clearance and to provide on‐the‐shelf PS&E for TxDOT letting not later  than August 2013, pending available construction funding.  Project Managers Ed Polasek, AICP and Bill Dryden, P.E.  Engineer Brown and Gay Engineers, Inc.      Element Status / Issues  Design Complete  Environmental/  Archeological  Environmental approved with Project Schematic.  Rights of Way All appraisals are complete.  Final offers have been made  for all ROW parcels.  The paperwork has been filed for all parcels requiring  condemnation.  Acquired: 29  Pending: 5  Condemnation: 2  Total: 36  Utility Relocations Ongoing as ROW is being acquired.  Construction Bid opened August 2014  Construction scheduled to commence February 2015.  Other Issues None Pending    Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit  September 2014    Project Description Develop a multi‐year implementation plan based on existing and cost effective  future storm water management practices in order to comply with the Texas  Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) Municipal Separate Storm  Sewer System (MS4) Permit.  Purpose On December 11, 2013, the TCEQ adopted rules for newly regulated MS4s  based on the 2010 Census designation of Urbanized Areas.  The City of  Georgetown is now part of Austin Large Urban Area based on those  designations.  Our 180 days to submit the Notice of Intent (NOI) and Storm  water Management Plan (SWMP) began on December 11, 2013.  The City of  Georgetown (City) has engaged HDR Engineering, Inc. (Engineer) to assist the  City with development of its Storm Water Management Program (SWMP) as a  result of the Cityʹs recent designation as a MS4 operator.  Initial services  include a review of available storm water program and water quality  information, a series of meetings with City departments and a City facility  review.  Permit submittal deadline to the TCEQ is June 11, 2014.  Project Managers Nat Waggoner, PMP®  Engineer/Engineers HDR, Inc.     Task Status / Issues  Initiation Scope of Services negotiations February 2014 – Completed    Planning February/March 2014 – Completed  Execution  Review and recommendation to Council by GTAB May 9, 2013 –   Completed   Adoption by Council May 27, 2014 – Completed   Submittal to TCEQ June 11, 2014 – Completed  Monitoring Public Notice of TCEQ Preliminary Determination‐ Received 25 August 2014   Comment period begins on the first date the notice is published and  ends 30 days later. ~ September 25th, 2014   If significant public interest exists, the TCEQ executive director will  direct the applicant to publish notice of the meeting and to hold the  public meeting.   Applicant must file with the Chief Clerk a copy and an affidavit of the  publication of notice(s) within 60 days of receiving the written  instructions from the Office of Chief Clerk  ~  October 25th, 2014   Year 1 begins October 1st 2014 and ends October 1st, 2015. End of year  report is due in December 2015.  Other Issues None    N Austin Avenue Sidewalk Improvements  Rec Center to Georgetown High School  Project No. 1CV     TIP No. None  September 2014  Project Description Design and preparation of final plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E) for the sidewalk  improvements along N. Austin Avenue between the Georgetown Recreational Center and  Georgetown High School.  Purpose To provide a safe pedestrian route along North Austin avenue.  Project Managers Bill Dryden, P.E.  Engineer URS Corporation    Element Status / Issues  Design Complete  Environmental/  Archeological  Complete  Rights of Way None  Utility Relocations None  Construction Construction ongoing; Contractor approximately 60% complete.  Other Issues None pending.    Shell Road Signal Improvements  Shell Road at Westbury Lane/Bellaire Drive  Project No. N/A     TIP No. None  September 2014  Project Description   Design and preparation of Plans, Specifications and Estimate for the construction  of signal improvements for the ultimate intersection of Shell Road at Westbury  Lane/Bellaire Drive and to determine future additional rights‐of‐way needs north  of the intersection.  Purpose To better manage traffic movements through and within the intersection.  Project Manager Bill Dryden, P.E.  Engineer Brown and Gay Engineers, Inc.      Element Status / Issues  Design Complete  Surveying Complete  Environmental/  Archeological  Complete  Rights of Way Complete  Utility Relocations Complete  Construction Project Complete  Other Issues Staff will collect new traffic count and speed data late‐September to evaluate  the impact of the signal.    Sidewalk Master Plan and Public Facility Access Audit September 2014 Purpose The purpose of the City of Georgetown Sidewalk Study and Public Facility Access Audit is to inventory existing public infrastructure within the City of Georgetown City Limits, identify design and compliance deficiencies, evaluate future program requirements, and develop a long term implementation plan. Project Managers Nat Waggoner, PMP® Engineer HDR, Inc. Task Status / Issues Initiation - Task 1.3 – Project Kick Off Meeting completed May 15, 2014. Planning - Task 4.4 – Coordinating Documents completed. Planning Open House #1 Execution - Schedule of Deliverables Task Name Start End ADA Reporting Criteria for Sidewalk Analysis May-14 Jun-14  Comprehensive Review of Existing Studies, Plans, and Reports May-14 Jun-14  Self-Assessment Survey of Downtown District May-14 Jul-14  Data Collection and Field Inventory Jun-14 Aug-14  City Facilities Survey Jul-14 Sep-14  Sidewalk Implementation Plan and Project Prioritization May-14 Oct-14 Ongoing Parks and Amenities Survey (NOT YET FUNDED) Oct-14 Nov-14 Expected Government and Public Stakeholder Meetings May-14 Jan-15 Public Meetings and Hearings Periodic thru Jan-15 ADA Transition Plan Update to Council Targeting Jan-15 Other Notes ADA • ADA TF Meeting 9/10/2014. Carina Reason, a representative of City’s Risk Management/Employee Safety and Human Resources added to City TF staff • The sidewalk accessibility survey is complete. A draft of findings was delivered August 19th. • Government owned buildings ADA compliance review complete. Draft reports delivered August 29th and the final priority report is expected October 31st. • A public meeting with the ADA Task Force to present a project overview and gather initial prioritization guidance was held August 13th. Project Website • Launched 7/15/2014 Open House #1 • 30 Sept 2014, City Council Chambers from 530-730. Individual board liaisons are encouraged to invite their respective boards. Staff highly encourages attendance from City Council, GTAB and GTEC. Deficiency Quantities Non-Accessible Sidewalk 5,696 lf Non-Accessible Curb Ramps 174 each Non-Accessible Pedestrian Crosswalks 17 each Protruding Objects 174 each Non-Accessible Pedestrian Push Buttons 8 each Non-Accessible Doors 55 each Non-Accessible Ramps 7 each Non-Accessible Driveways 67 each Smith Branch  September 2014  Project Description Voluntary acquisition of eight (8) properties with finished floor elevations below  the base flood elevation in the Smith Branch Watershed  Purpose To reduce future flood damage risk for homes below the 100‐year floodplain  elevation.  Project Managers Wesley Wright, P.E., and Terri Calhoun, SR/WA, R/W‐NAC  Engineer Kasberg, Patrick, & Associates (Flood Study)/Spitzer & Associates (Real Estate)      Element Status / Issues  Design Completed – Flood Study completed in 2013  Environmental/  Archeological  Possible asbestos abatement on properties upon acquisition. TBD.    Property  Acquisition  GTAB and Council approved counter‐offers on all eight  (8) properties.  Contracts are signed.  Anticipate closing  on all parcels by 9/30/14.  This is a willing buyer – willing  seller program and all identified properties are being  acquired.    Acquired: 0  Pending: 8  Condemnation: 0  Total: 8  Utility Relocations Will require termination of services  Construction Upon acquisition of properties, structures will be demolished and the lot returned  to grass.    Other Issues None Pending    Southeast Inner Loop Corridor Study  (IH 35 to Rockride Lane)  Project No. None     Project No. None  September 2014  Project Description   Develop preliminary design schematic alternatives, perform preliminary  engineering and prepare an engineering report for the Southeast Inner Loop  Schematic Design from IH 35 to Rockride Lane (CR 110) and Sam Houston Avenue.  Purpose To determine ultimate alignment, interim and ultimate engineer’s estimates of  probable project costs and ROW needs for the future SH 29 Bypass, connecting the  westerly route (SH 29 to IH 35) with Southeast Inner Loop and Sam Houston  Avenue.  Project Manager Bill Dryden, P.E.  Engineer Kasberg Patrick and Associates      Element Status / Issues  Design Draft Preliminary Report was presented to GTAB in March.  Meetings with  adjacent/affected land owners on‐going.  Draft Final Report will be returned to GTAB in September for Board  discussions and possible recommendation of adoption by Council.  Surveying  TBD (future)  Environmental/  Archeological  TBD (future)  Rights of Way To be conceptually established during the preliminary schematic phase and  further refined through the design phases.  Utility Relocations TBD (future)  Construction TBD (future)  Other Issues Staff has met with the public sector stakeholders (City, TxDOT and  WilCo) and their various engineering firms working along the Southwest  Bypass/SE Inner Loop connection and the I 35 corridor.    Southwest Bypass Project   (RM 2243 to IH 35)  Project No. 1CA     Project No. 14c  September 2014  Unchanged  Project Description   Develop a Design Schematic for the Southwest Bypass from Leander Road (RM 2243) to IH  35 in the ultimate configuration and Construction Plans, Specifications and Estimate (PS&E)  for construction of approximately 1.5 miles of interim 2‐lane roadway from Leander Road  (RM 2243) to its intersection with the existing Inner Loop underpass at IH 35.  The portion  from Leander Road to the east property line of Texas Crushed Stone is a GTAB Project; from  the east line to the existing Inner Loop underpass at IH 35 is being funded by GTEC.  Purpose To extend an interim portion of the SH 29 Bypass, filling in between Leander Road (RM  2243) to IH 35 Southbound Frontage Road.  Project Manager Williamson County  City Contact: Ed Polasek, AICP and Bill Dryden, P.E.  Engineer HDR, Inc.      Element Status / Issues  Design Engineer is in preliminary engineering and schematic design phase of the facility.  Alignment has been presented to staff and management.  Surveying  City stall met with the Surveyor to resolve a conflict in the proposed ROW to be  acquired from Texas Crushed Stone.  Environmental/  Archeological  TBD by preliminary engineering phase.  Rights of Way Conceptually established by the Industrial Agreement; will be refined through the  schematic design phase.  Negotiations ongoing for the remainder of the ROW  Utility Relocations TBD (future)  Construction This project included in the Williamson County 2013 Bond Program to construct 2  lanes of the ultimate roadway.  Other Issues None    Transit Study  as Requested by City Council   Project No. None     Project No. None  September 2014  Unchanged  Project  Description    Council Motion:  Discussion and possible direction to the City of Georgetownʹs Transportation  Advisory Board (GTAB) to conduct an analysis and make a recommendation to the City Council  no later than June 24, 2014 ,regarding the Cityʹs potential future participation in State and  Regional Transportation Organizations including the benefits, conditions, and justification which  would prompt the Cityʹs participation in Project Connect, Lone Star Rail and any other relevant  State and Regional Transportation Organizations that the City should be involved with ‐‐ Steve  Fought, Councilmember, District 4  Amended Motion:  1. The City Manager to determine what time and effort staff have available to conduct this type  of study over the next year.  If it is not in the Transportation Division, Planning Department,  Finance Department and/or City Manager’s Office work program, as outlined in the current  draft budget, can it be adequately staffed to complete this level of work over the next year?  2. Is the challenge to research Federal, State and Regional transportation organizations or is it  transit programs?  This direction to staff is assuming it is transit programs.  3. Narrow the specific analysis to programs that are actually authorized to receive Federal  formula and discretionary funding programs found within the current Federal Transit  Administration.  However, that would narrow the field down to three agencies or programs.   Capital Metro, Lone Star Rail and the State of Texas through the Texas Department of  Transportation.  CARTS is only a contractor to Capital Metro and provides certain 5310  transit opportunities to persons outside of the Capital Metro Service Area in our jurisdiction.   CAMPO, Project Connect, Project Connect North and My35 are simply planning programs  that include staff from Capital Metro, Lone Star Rail District, and TxDOT and  representatives from local governments.  4. The analysis should be based on how those planning programs will lead to funding through  the project delivery agencies.  (Fought amended to include financial risk and benefits to the City)  5. The Council should provide the Board and staff specifics on what type of economic analysis  data will lead to an ultimate decision by the City Council.  6. Finally, some people ‘can’t see what the final project would look like’ or ‘can’t see what a  Transit Oriented Development would look like.’  Years ago, when the City was looking at  transportation options and creating a TOD ordinance, there was a field trip to perform some  on the ground research.  Members of the City Council, Planning and Zoning, and staff  (GTAB was not in existence at the time) went and stayed at a TOD to see for themselves.   We should have at least one field trip during this study.  Since it has been about 8 years or  so since that first and only field trip, it should be extremely informative to do it again and  see what a TOD looks like today and how the project has performed over the years.  Vote on the original motion as amended: Approved (6‐1) (Hesser opposed)    Project  Manager  Ed Polasek, AICP  Engineer TBD  Project Status Workplan Under Development    Transportation Services Operations   CIP Maintenance  September 2014  Project Description 2012/13‐2014 CIP Maintenance of roadways including, Chip seal, Cutler  Overlays, Fog seal applications and Engineering design of future rehabilitation  projects.  Purpose To provide protection and maintain an overall pavement condition index of  85%.  Project Manager Mark Miller  Engineer/Engineers KPA, Steger Bizzell, Halff Assoc.  Task Status / Issues  2nd and 6th Street  Engineering  (Halff)  2nd at Austin Avenue intersection improvement along with 6th Street  (Austin Ave. to Rock) (Smith Contracting) 2nd and 6th Street under  construction.  14th Street staked and scheduled for construction following  utility installation.    (KPA) 2nd St to College St plans are 60% complete.  Stake holder meeting held  on September 2nd at Engineer office to explain proposed street, sidewalk and  park improvements.  Attendance was low but comments were positive.  9th Street  (Main to Rock)  (KPA) (Patin Construction)  Preconstruction held September 3rd.  Notice to  proceed was given and notification/schedule should be provided to businesses  shortly.  Underground work (conduits and storm drain will be installed first  followed by road, curb and sidewalk improvements.  Chip Seal  The contractor Cholla began on August 6th.  Work took approximately two  weeks.  Considering temperatures were extremely high and drying times were  extended, the two course treatments with Quick Set treatment has resulted in  aesthetically pleasing, quiet, chip free surfaces. A few reported chipped  windshields, but very few complaints.  Staff is extremely pleased with the new  specifications and resulting product and plan to continue to refine the  process.  Fog Seal Fog Seal started June 2nd.  Complete.  Cutler/overlay All work completed by mid‐July.  Downtown merchants and residents provided positive feedback.  Pavement  Evaluation  KPA Engineering: pavement evaluation/scoring and update of 5 year CIP  reflecting changes and additions is waiting for Fugro Engineering.  Fugro sent  email estimating all pavement scores should be available by end of September.       City of Georgetown, Texas SUBJECT: Presentation of Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation monthly financial report for August 2014. Micki Rundell, Chief Financial Officer, COG, Finance Manager GTEC ITEM SUMMARY: The Bylaws of GTEC (Article V, Section 6.02) require the Finance Manager to report the financial activity of the Corporation to the Board. Budgetary report Sales Tax revenues Any other relevant financial information Sales tax is received two months in arrears; therefore the revenues reflect only the amount received, not actually earned, as of the report date. A report on payments made to vendors for the month of August is also included. FINANCIAL IMPACT: n/a SUBMITTED BY: Micki Rundell (jk) ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Financials Backup Material City of Georgetown, Texas SUBJECT: Consideration and possible action to approve minutes from the regular GTEC Board meeting held August 20, 2014. Paul E. Brandenburg, General Manager - GTEC ITEM SUMMARY: Board to review the minutes from the meeting held on August 20, 2014 and revise or approve. FINANCIAL IMPACT: n/a SUBMITTED BY: Paul E. Brandenburg (jk) ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Draft Minutes Backup Material Minutes of the Meeting of Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation and the Governing Body of the City of Georgetown, Texas Wednesday, Aug 20, 2014 The Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation of the City of Georgetown, Texas, met on Wednesday, Aug 20, 2014. Board Members Present: Bill Connor - President, John Hesser – Vice President, Tommy Gonzalez, Jesus Moulinet, Leo Wood Board Members Absent: Johnny Anderson, Jerry Hammerlun Staff Present: Paul Brandenburg, Ed Polasek, Jana Kern, Bill Dryden, Bridget Chapman, Terri Calhoun, Micki Rundell, Mike Babin, Others Present: Tom Crawford – Road Bond Committee Chair Minutes Regular Session (This Regular Session may, at any time, be recessed to convene and Executive Session for any purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code 551.) A. Call to Order – Mr. Bill Connor called the regular GTEC Board meeting to order on Wednesday, August 20, 2014 at 3:30 PM The Board may, at any time, recess the Regular Session to convene in Executive Session at the President, A Board Member, The City Manager, Assistant City Manager, General Manager of Utilities, City Council Member, and/or legal counsel for any purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code Chapter 551, and are subject to action in the Regular Session that follows. B. Introduction of Visitors C. Industry/CAMPO/TXDOT Updates: CAMPO - to have a decision on STP-MM by October Board Meeting. TxDOT - Mike Walker Environmental Austin District announced retirement. His retirement is a loss to TxDOT and the region. No other info about his replacement. D. Presentation related to the transportation elements of the Hillwood Wolf Ranch Development. - Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Transportation Services Director and Bridget Chapman, City Attorney Polasek gave a presentation to the board. E. Discussion regarding the Project Progress Reports and Time Lines. – Bill Dryden, P.E., Transportation Engineer and Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Transportation Services Director Dryden updated the Board F. Presentation of Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation monthly financial report for July 2014. – Micki Rundell, Chief Financial Officer, COG, Finance Manager Rundell updated the Board. Legislative Regular Agenda G. Consideration and possible action to approve minutes from the regular GTEC Board meeting held July 16, 2014. – Paul E. Brandenburg – General Manager, GTEC Motion by Gonzalez, second by Hesser to approve the minutes as presented. Approved unanimously 5-0 (Anderson & Hammerlun absent) H. Public Hearing by the Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation (GTEC) regarding the expenditure of 4B sales tax for the proposed 2014/15 Budget. – Micki Rundell, Chief Financial Officer, COG, Finance Manager Rundell explained the item and Mr. Connor opened the Public Hearing at 4:08 PM anyone wishing to speak may do so now. Seeing and hearing no one we will close the Public Hearing at 4:09 PM I. Consideration and possible action to approve Possession and Use Agreement with (1) Rabbit Hill Partners, through its owners Brian F. Peterson and Gordon L. Peterson (Parcel 211); and (2) Gordon L. Peterson, Brian F. Peterson and Peggy Peterson (Parcel 212), in the amounts of $207,913.50 and $126,398.70, respectively. – Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Transportation Services Director and Terri Calhoun, Real Estate Services Coordinator Motion by Gonzalez, second by Hesser to approve the PUA. Approved unanimously 5-0 (Anderson & Hammerlun absent) Adjournment Motion by Hesser, second by Gonzalez to adjourn meeting. Meeting adjourned at 4:45 PM. Approved unanimously 5-0 (Anderson & Hammerlun absent) Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 4:45 PM. Approved: Attest: _______________________ ________________________ Bill Connor - President Jerry Hammerlun– Secretary _________________________ Jana R. Kern – Board Liaison City of Georgetown, Texas SUBJECT: Consideration and possible action to approve Task Order KPA-15-001 with Kasberg, Patrick & Associates, LP, of Georgetown, Texas, for professional engineering services related to the final engineering design for construction plans, specifications and estimate and for rights-of-way acquisition services for the Rivery Boulevard Extension from Williams Drive to Northwest Boulevard in the amount of $706,110.00. – Bill Dryden, P.E., Transportation Engineer and Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Transportation Services Director. ITEM SUMMARY: In 2004, the City identified the area around I 35 and Williams Drive, extending north to Northwest Boulevard, as a highly visible and strategically important 85-acre economic development and redevelopment area for Georgetown. In 2005 and 2006, the City conducted a public input process that led to citizen (and property owner) goals and general vision for the area. This vision included the realignment of several local streets, the continuation of major thoroughfares through the heart of the development area, and an integrated design model that encouraged a pedestrian-friendly, urban streetscape. The City Council adopted a Mixed-Use zoning code that can be applied as the area redevelops. As economic conditions have changed since 2006, it has become apparent that the transportation system on the periphery of the core development is vital to the success of the interior development. One part of that system is the extension of Rivery Boulevard from intersection with Williams Drive to Northwest Boulevard, providing a thoroughfare network which minimizes traffic congestion on Williams Drive and encourages further development in this gateway area. The City engaged the firm of Kasberg, Patrick and Associates, LP (KPA) to develop alignment alternatives and preliminary engineering plans for an alignment for the Rivery Boulevard Extension from Williams Drive to Northwest Boulevard. KPA presented various alignment alternatives to GTEC in January 2013 and a locally preferred alternative was forwarded to Council for its approval and adoption in May 2013. In its budget for FY 2014-2015, GTEC has allocated funding to complete the construction plans, specifications and estimate (PS&E) for the project and to begin the rights-of-way acquisition process. Through its process to select providers of professional services, the City has selected KPA as the most qualified firm to provide services for developing the Final PS&E and ROW acquisition for the Rivery Boulevard Extension project. KPA proposed to provide these services in the amount of $444,610.00 for PS&E and $261,500.00 for ROW acquisition services for a total amount of $706,110.00. Staff has reviewed the proposal recommends the proposed Task Order KPA-15-001 based upon an acceptable scope of services for the project. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approve Task Order KPA-15-001 with Kasberg, Patrick & Associates, LP (KPA) of Georgetown, Texas, to provide Final PS&E and ROW acquisition services for the Rivery Boulevard Extension from Williams Drive to Northwest Boulevard in the amount of $706,110.00. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Funding for the Project is available in the adopted FY 2014-2015 GTEC budget. The financial worksheet is attached. SUBMITTED BY: Bill Dryden, P.E., Transportation Engineer ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Financial Worksheet Exhibit Proposed Task Order KPA-15-001 with Attachments Exhibit PROJECT NO.DATE: PROJECT NAME:5RM 9/11/14 Division/Department:Director Approval EGP 9/11/14 Prepared By:Finance Approval La'Ke09/11/14 TOTAL ANNUAL BUDGET 1,500,000.00 (Current year only) Actual Cost Agenda Total Spent Encumbrance Item & Encumbered % Annual (A) before agenda item (B)(A + B) Budget Consulting 706,110.00 706,110.00 47% Right of Way 0.00 0% Construction 0.00 0% Other Costs 0.00 0% Total Current Year Costs 0.00 706,110.00 706,110.00 Approved GENERAL LEDGER ACCOUNT NUMBER CY Budget 400-9-0980-90-053 Rivery Blvd Extn 1,500,000.00 Total Budget 1,500,000.00 TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET 1,500,000.00 (includes all previous yrs) Prior Years Current Year Total Project % Total Spent/Encumbered Costs Costs Budget Consulting 0.00 706,110.00 706,110.00 47% Right of Way 0.00 0.00 0% Construction 0.00 0.00 0% Other Costs 0.00 0.00 0% Total Project Costs 0.00 706,110.00 706,110.00 Comments: The $1.5m budget is 14/15 approved budget. Form is to get approval for the new year. Transportation Services Rivery Blvd Extension Final PS&E and ROW Acquisition CIP- Budgetary and Financial Analysis Worksheet Bill Dryden, P.E. TASK ORDER Georgetown – Revised 3.11 EJCDC E-505 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Engineer Professional Services—Task Order Edition Copyright ©2004 National Society of Professional Engineers for EJCDC. All rights reserved. Attachment 1 – Task Order Form Page 1 of 4 Task Order In accordance with paragraph 1.01 of the Master Services Agreement between Owner and Kasberg, Patrick & Associates, LP (“Engineer”) for Professional Services – Task Order Edition, dated March 23, 2011 (“Agreement”), Owner and Engineer agree as follows: 1. Specific Project Data A. Title: Rivery Boulevard Extension B. Description: The project will consist of providing final roadway, drainage, water, wastewater and incidental designs, environmental phase I investigations, geotechnical specifications, ROW metes and bounds documents, ROW Acquisition/Negotiation Services, ROW Appraisal Services, bidding documents, specifications and estimate (PS&E) package for the Rivery Boulevard Extension from Rivery Boulevard’s intersection with Williams Drive to Northwest Boulevard. C. City of Georgetown Project Number: 5RM D. City of Georgetown General Ledger Account No.: 400-9-0980-90-053 E. City of Georgetown Purchase Order No.: F. Master Services Agreement, Contract Number: 2011-702-MSA 2. Services of Engineer See Exhibit A, Scope of Services, attached 3. Owner's Responsibilities Owner shall have those responsibilities set forth in the Agreement subject to the following: Consultant will require coordination from the City to capture locations of existing City owned utilities within the project limits. Additionally, Consultant may require assistance from City Staff to verify existing easements within the project area as well as rights of entry and acquisition of any required rights-of-way. 4. Times for Rendering Services Engineer shall perform the work stated above according to the schedule below. All times are from the date Notice to Proceed from Owner, or the previous phase, as appropriate. Phase Completion Date Right of Way Documentation December 15, 2014 Final Design February 15, 2015 Bidding Documents April 1, 2015 Task Order No. KPA-15-001, consisting of 30 pages. TASK ORDER Georgetown – Revised 3.11 EJCDC E-505 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Engineer Professional Services—Task Order Edition Copyright ©2004 National Society of Professional Engineers for EJCDC. All rights reserved. Attachment 1 – Task Order Form Page 2 of 4 5. Payments to Engineer A. Owner shall pay Engineer for services rendered as follows: Category of Services Compensation Method Lump Sum or Not to Exceed Amount of Compensation for Services Basic Services Project Management/Support, Final Engineering Design, Bidding Documents, Surveying, Geotechnical Services, Environmental Clearances, Geological Assessment A. Lump Sum $444,610.00 Special Services ROW Negotiations for Acquisition, Relocation and Condemnation , ROW Appraisals B. Not to Exceed $261,500.00 Total Compensation: $706,110.00 B. The terms of payment are set forth in Article 4 of the Agreement unless modified in this Task Order. 6. Consultants: Kasberg, Patrick & Associates, LP – Georgetown, Texas Terracon Associates, Inc. – Austin, Texas Inland Geodetics – Round Rock, Texas Lee Engineering – Dallas, Texas Maple & Associates – Georgetown, Texas 7. Other Modifications to Agreement: None 8. Attachments: Exhibit A – Scope of Services Exhibit B – Fee Schedule Exhibit C – Project Location Map 9. Documents Incorporated By Reference: The Agreement effective March 23, 2011. TASK ORDER Georgetown – Revised 3.11 EJCDC E-505 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Engineer Professional Services—Task Order Edition Copyright ©2004 National Society of Professional Engineers for EJCDC. All rights reserved. Attachment 1 – Task Order Form Page 3 of 4 Terms and Conditions: Execution of this Task Order by Owner and Engineer shall make it subject to the terms and conditions of the Agreement (as modified above), which Agreement is incorporated by this reference. Engineer is authorized to begin performance upon its receipt of a copy of this Task Order signed by Owner. OWNER: City of Georgetown ENGINEER: Kasberg, Patrick & Associates By: By: Name: Dale Ross Name: Alvin R. Sutton III, PE, CFM Title: Mayor Title: Principal Engineer License or Firm’s Certificate No. F-510 State of: Texas Date: Date: ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM ONLY BY CITY ATTORNEY AND BY CITY COUNCIL MARCH 8, 2011, AGENDA ITEM “P” APPROVED AS TO FORM VERIFIED: ________________________________________ Vickie Graff, CPPO, CTPM Contract Coordinator Jessica Brettle City Secretary STATE OF TEXAS § CORPORATE COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON § ACKNOWLEDGEMENT On this day of , 2014, Alvin R. Sutton III personally appeared before me and proved to me through satisfactory evidence of identification to be the person who signed this document in my presence. [SEAL] ________________________________________ Notary Public My Commission Expires:____________________ TASK ORDER Georgetown – Revised 3.11 EJCDC E-505 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Engineer Professional Services—Task Order Edition Copyright ©2004 National Society of Professional Engineers for EJCDC. All rights reserved. Attachment 1 – Task Order Form Page 4 of 4 Owner: Engineer: Designated Representative For Task Order: Designated Representative For Task Order: Name: Bill Dryden, PE Name: Trae Sutton, P.E., CFM Title: Transportation Engineer Title: Sr. Project Manager Address: 300-1 Industrial Ave. Address: 1008 South Main Street Georgetown, TX 78626 Georgetown, TX 78626 E-Mail: Bill.Dryden@gerogetown.org E-Mail: TSutton@kpaengineers.com Phone: (512) 930-8096 Phone: (512) 819-9478 Fax: (512) 930-3559 Fax: (254) 773-6667 Page 1 of 4 EXHIBIT A DETAILED PROJECT SCOPE of SERVICES PROVIDED BY ENGINEER KASBERG, PATRICK & ASSOCIATES, LP GEORGETOWN, TEXAS Project Description: The work to be performed by the Engineer under this contract consists of providing final plans and specifications for the Rivery Boulevard Extension Project. The project will consist of providing final roadway, drainage, water, wastewater and incidental designs, environmental phase I investigations, geotechnical specifications, ROW metes and bounds documents, bidding documents, specifications and estimate (PS&E) package for the Rivery Boulevard Extension from Rivery Boulevard’s intersection with Williams Drive to Northwest Boulevard. This project will also include ROW negotiation services for property acquisition, relocation services, and condemnation services as well as ROW appraisals for the impacted properties. Scope of Services: The scope of services associated with the Rivery Boulevard Extension Project includes: I. Project Management/Coordination a. The ENGINEER shall attend and document Project Kickoff Meeting at the City of Georgetown Office. b. The ENGINEER shall coordinate, attend and document a Utility Coordination Meeting with the existing utilities located within the proposed corridor to discuss impacts this project on the existing utilities. The ENGINEER shall document the highlights of this meeting. Assume two (2) meetings shall be required. c. The ENGINEER shall attend 30%, 60%, 90% and 100% Project Submittal Meetings with City Staff. The ENGINEER shall review the submittal package with City Staff and provide written questions and or comments that may arise during the design process and review those with City Staff and provide recommendations, if required. These meetings may also include meeting with Landowners to review the proposed project alignment. Assume six (6) meetings shall be required. d. The ENGINEER shall provide Contract Management and Coordination. This shall include developing monthly invoices and progress reports, subconsultant coordination, design coordination with the City and design coordination with dry utilities. e. The ENGINEER shall obtain and review the existing data provided from the City and that have a direct impact of the proposed project. II. Right of Way a. The ENGINEER will research the current property ownership along the proposed route and provide an updated property ownership map and list of impacted property owners to the City for use in obtaining right of entry. Page 2 of 4 b. The ENGINEER will provide project support in the form of project data, exhibits and information to the City’s assigned right-of-way agent. The ENGINEER will be available to attend meetings with impacted property owners to address questions and comments, if requested. c. The ENGINEER will provide project data, exhibits and information to the surveyor in support of preparation of a right-of-way map, metes and bounds documents and field sketches. The ENGINEER will review the field sketches and metes and bounds documents to verify document accuracy. III. Final Design Roadway Design a. Roadway Geometric Design. The ENGINEER will develop final roadway schematic designs with horizontal and vertical alignments based off the topographic surveys. The alignments will be in compliance with the City of Georgetown, TxDOT and AASHTO Roadway Design Criteria. The ENGINEER will review final schematic alignment with City Staff. b. Typical Sections. The ENGINEER will utilize the roadway geometric design to develop existing and proposed typical roadway sections for project. c. Plan & Profile Sheets – Roadway. The ENGINEER will prepared plan & profile sheets for the project. The sheets shall include existing topography, utilities, control data, preliminary roadway geometry (vertical and horizontal), drainage improvements, multi-use trail facility and other related improvements. d. Intersection Layouts. The ENGINEER shall design roundabout and typical intersection layouts that identify all horizontal and vertical geometry along the proposed project route. This will also include obtaining project data and alignment(s) from adjacent and/or connecting design projects as may affect the development of proposed alignment. e. Cross Sections for Roadway. The ENGINEER will prepare roadway cross sections at intervals not to exceed 100 feet along to the proposed roadway alignment. The cross sections shall include the proposed roadway improvements, multi-use trail facility and other related drainage improvements. f. Traffic Signal Layouts. The ENGINEER (Lee Engineering) shall prepare final traffic signal layouts at the intersection of Rivery Boulevard and Williams Drive. The layout shall include the traffic signal poles, pedestrian signal poles, controllers and electrical service. g. Multi-Use Trail Facility. The ENGINEER shall perform final design in order to develop plan and profile drawings for a multi-use trail facility along the proposed project route. The design of the multi-use trail facility shall be in accordance with the American with Disabilities Act (ADA), Texas Department of License and Page 3 of 4 Regulations (TDLR) and TxDOT design requirements for pedestrian facilities and AASHTO Guidelines for Bike Facilities. Drainage Design a. The ENGINEER will incorporate all design surveys into computer aided drafting and develop topographies and surfaces. This data will be utilized to develop final drainage areas, hydrology and hydraulics. This will include topographic working drawings to prepare the final drainage design. b. The ENGINEER will develop storm water hydrology for the ultimate roadway section for the project area. The hydrology will be modeled utilizing HEC-HMS with City of Georgetown drainage criteria. The model will incorporate the 10%, 4%, 2% and 1% annual chance storm events. Modeling will develop storm water flows to all cross culverts and roadway conveyances. Based on the data developed drainage infrastructure will be designed for final design for the project area. c. The ENGINEER will develop plan and profile for the proposed storm water collection systems for the project area. d. The ENGINEER will finalize the requirements for water quality for the roadway section. Designs will be based on the new impervious cover that will be established with the ultimate build out of the project and current TCEQ requirements for construction within the Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone. The ENGINEER will endeavor to combine conveyance infrastructure with water quality in an effort to minimize project costs. e. The ENGINEER will provide final design of a detention/water quality pond located on the north end of the project near Northwest Boulevard and shall include final design for the pond, outlet structure, overall grading plan and typical cross sections for the pond. f. The ENGINEER will determine potential utility conflicts based on final design for the project area. Coordination with utility companies will be performed by meeting with all effected utilities during the preliminary design phase. g. The ENGINEER will meet with Staff to review the final drainage design, phasing for the project, utility conflicts and relocations, water quality options, etc. All comments and direction from the meeting will be incorporated in to the project. Water/Wastewater Design a. The ENGINEER will incorporate the existing City water and wastewater lines into the proposed plan/profile plan sets. The ENGINEER will utilize this existing data to develop connection points for the proposed water and wastewater extensions. b. The ENGINEER will utilize the existing City of Georgetown Water and Wastewater Master Plans to incorporate proposed lines sizes. The ENGINEER will verify the proposed line sizes and review with City Staff to confirm the proposed water and Page 4 of 4 wastewater line sizes. c. The ENGINEER will develop plan and profile for the proposed water line and wastewater collection systems for the project area. d. The ENGINEER will identify the requirements for water quality for the wastewater line. The ENGINEER will prepare a Sewage Collection System (SCS) Plan & Report and submit the proposed plan to TCEQ for review and comments. The Engineer will incorporate any comments received in the project plans. e. The ENGINEER will provide connection details and layouts for the proposed water and wastewater line extensions f. The ENGINEER will provide roadway crossing designs and details. Incidentals Design a. The ENGINEER will design erosion control measures to be utilized for the project and shall identify the locations of the measures to be installed in an overall erosion control exhibit to be incorporated into the plans. b. The ENGINEER will design an overall striping plan for the project route in accordance with City of Georgetown, TxDOT and Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (TMUTCD) requirements. c. The ENGINEER will identify locations and layouts for the installation of dry utility conduit and/or conduit to be utilized by the City at a later date. d. The ENGINEER will prepare a traffic control plan in accordance with the City of Georgetown, TxDOT and Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (TMUTCD) requirements. e. The ENGINEER will provide miscellaneous construction details required to construct the project. Bid Document Preparation a. The ENGINEER will develop and prepare project specific technical specifications. b. The ENGINEER will prepare a project bid schedule. The ENGINEER will perform a quantity take off for the project and will prepare and opinion of probable construction cost based off the 100% plan sets (bidding sets). c. The ENGINEER will prepare Contract Documents and Technical Specification books and 100% Plan Sets and deliver to the City. (10 Sets) 1504 Chisholm Trail Road Suite 103 Round Rock, TX 78681 512-238-1200 512-238-1251 fax June 2, 2014 June 9, 2014 (revised) Trae Sutton, P.E. Kasberg, Patrick & Associates, LP 1008 South Main Street Georgetown, TX 78626 RE: Engineering Design Surveying Project: Rivery Boulevard Extension Mr. Sutton: Inland Geodetics, LP (Inland) is pleased to submit our proposal for professional land surveying services related to the above referenced project. Below is our proposed Scope of Services and estimated costs to date. SCOPE OF SERVICES Limits: Rivery Boulevard Extension from Williams Drive to Northwest Blvd and then the Clay St. Re-alignment from IH 35 to the proposed Rivery roundabout. Below is our proposed Scope of Services and estimated fees to date. Topographic Surveying 1. The City will provide the Right of Entries (ROE) to Inland prior to the field operations. Inland will address the owners request and comments pertaining to the survey tasks. 2. Inland will attempt recovery of survey datum control as established previously for local, State and County projects in the immediate vicinity of this project. The values will be reconciled to NAD 83 Texas State Plane Coordinates, Central Zone 4203, US Survey feet. 3. Inland will establish and densify secondary control as needed for topographic and boundary data gathering procedures. 4. Inland will perform differential level loops for installation of a benchmark system at strategic locations at approximate 500 foot intervals within the project limits. 5. Collect spot elevations along the project route including edges of back of curbs, driveways, visible utilities, drainage structures, centerline of roads, trees 8” and up, any other hard surfaced improvements within the defined area, grade breaks, flowlines of watercourses, and other significant features relevant to the project (MH inverts, if any). The collected data will include spot elevations and breaklines sufficient to generate and/or merge to a 1 foot contour interval DTM for the project. 6. Deliverables will include an Autocad 3D file with break-lines. A DTM file processed to 1.0 foot contours will be provided and the associated spot point data in ASCII format. A list of benchmarks and project control coordinates will be included in list formats and notated in the DTM file. 7. Inland will locate and process up to 5 geotechnical boreholes within the project limits. City of Georgetown – Rivery Blvd. Extension PAGE 2 ROW/Boundary Acquisition Surveying 8. Inland will perform sufficient boundary analysis to prepare deliverables for up to 20 parcels along the project route. This proposal assumes that there will be no preparation of easements. 9. Inland will review and address the Schedule B comments from the Title Commitments provided by the City. 10. Final deliverables will be a signed and sealed survey plat and accompanying metes and bounds description for each parcel. 11. Inland will place durable monuments marking the acquisition parcels in the field with 5/8” iron rods (rebar) with stamped aluminum caps. The estimated lump sum fee for topographic surveying is: $24,022.00 The estimated lump sum fee for ROW products is: $75,798.00 Total: $99,820.00 NOTE: This proposal understands that KPA LP will provide a VALID and CURRENT Tax Exempt Resale Certificate issued from the City of Round Rock for the purchase of taxable land surveying services as a component of their deliverables. A copy of this certificate will be forwarded to Inland Geodetics, LP in lieu of incurring sales tax charges for the boundary surveying portion of this proposal. The estimated fee proposed above are based on personnel time required to perform the described Scope of Services. Additional time requirements resulting from project scope changes, route changes, plan revisions, field recovery of or discrepancies of control provided will be considered reasonable cause for us to seek additional compensation for services not included in these amounts. Sincerely, Brenda Sies President Inland Geodetics, LLC Texas TBPLS Firm No. 10059100 Terracon Consultants, Inc. 5307 Industrial Oaks Boulevard, Ste. 160 Austin, TX 78735 Registration No. F -3272 P [512] 442 1122 F [5 12] 442 1181 terracon.com June 3, 2014 Kasberg Patrick and Associates LP 1008 South Main Street Georgetown, Texas 78626 Attn: Mr. Trae Sutton, P.E., CFM P: 512.819.9478 E: tsutton@kpaengineers.com Re: Proposal for Geotechnical Engineering Services Rivery Blvd Extension & Clay St Realignment Williams Dr to Northwest Blvd Georgetown, Texas Terracon Proposal No. P96140663 Dear Mr. Sutton: Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Terracon) appreciates the opportunity to submit this proposal to provide geotechnical engineering services for the above referenced project. The purpose of this study will be to evaluate the pertinent geotechnical conditions at the site and to develop geotechnical parameters, which will assist in the design and construction of pavements. Based on email correspondence and a conceptual site plan provided to us, this proposal outlines our understanding of the project and scope of services and provides a lump sum fee for our services. 1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION 1.1 Site Location Item Description Location This project site is located in Georgetown, Texas. Existing Improvements Roads and residences. Current Ground Cover Asphaltic pavements, exposed soils, grass, weeds, and scattered trees. Existing Topography Unknown at this time. Proposal for Geotechnical Engineering Services Rivery Blvd Extension & Clay St Realignment ■ Georgetown, Texas June 3, 2014 ■ Terracon Proposal No. P96140663 Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 2 1.2 Project Description Item Description Proposed Improvements The project is planned to include an approximate 2,800 linear foot extension of Rivery Boulevard between Williams Drive and Northwest Boulevard. In addition, the project includes an approximate 750 linear foot realignment of Clay Street between the IH 35 southbound frontage road and the Rivery Boulevard extension. Road Construction Assumed asphaltic concrete over base material, possibly with geogrid and/or lime treatment Grading Unknown at this time, but assumed ≤ 2 feet from existing grades and that all road construction will be at-grade (no elevated bridge sections). Cut and Fill Slopes Assumed no steeper than 3H:1V (Horizontal to Vertical), if any. Free-Standing Retaining Walls Assumed low-height walls ≤ 4 feet tall, if any are needed. Should any of the above information or assumptions be inconsistent with the planned construction, please let us know so that we may make any necessary modifications to this proposal. 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES The services to be provided by Terracon are summarized in the following paragraphs. 2.1 Field Program Based on the proposed roadways, we propose to perform ten (10) borings to maximum depths of about 10 feet each. Some will be located within grassy unpaved areas, while some will be located within existing roadways. This proposal includes up to two days of subcontracted traffic control services for the borings located within existing pavements, if needed. The drilling services for this project will be performed by a drilling subcontractor under Terracon’s direction. Our fee is based on the alignment being accessible to our conventional two-wheel drive truck-mounted drilling equipment during normal business hours (07:00 AM through 06:00 PM on weekdays). Additional costs may result if this is not the case. During our drilling operations, vehicle and pedestrian access to those areas (about 30 feet by 30 feet square area) around each boring will be restricted. Our scope and fees do not include services associated with site grading, wet/soft ground conditions (the use of ATV or track-mounted equipment), tree/shrub clearing, repair/replacement of existing landscape, pressure-washing of pavements after drilling, or location of underground utilities beyond contacting the Texas Excavation Safety System (TESS) locate service, which only marks utilities in public easements Proposal for Geotechnical Engineering Services Rivery Blvd Extension & Clay St Realignment ■ Georgetown, Texas June 3, 2014 ■ Terracon Proposal No. P96140663 Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 3 and right-of-ways. If such conditions are known to exist on the site, Terracon should be notified so that we may adjust our scope of services and fee, if necessary. The layout of the borings will be approximated based on plans provided to us by the Client. Boring depths will be measured from existing grades or top of pavement at the time of drilling. (Professional surveying of boring locations is not included in our scope.) Sampling will be in general accordance with industry standard procedures wherein Shelby tube samples or split- barrel (Standard Penetration Test) samples are obtained. If in soil or weathered bedrock, four to five samples will be obtained in each boring In addition, we will observe and record groundwater levels during and at completion of drilling. The boreholes will not be left open overnight or for extended periods of time to monitor groundwater, due to safety concerns. Once the samples have been collected and classified in the field, they will be placed in appropriate sample containers for transport to our laboratory. For safety purposes, all borings will be backfilled immediately after their completion with auger cuttings and bentonite pellets. For the borings located in existing paved areas, the surface of the boreholes will be capped with cold-patch asphalt. Excess auger cuttings will be disposed of on the site. Because backfill material often settles below the surface after a period of time, we recommend the boreholes be checked periodically and backfilled if necessary. We could provide this service at your request, but this would involve additional costs for supplemental site visits. As mentioned above, we plan to contact the Texas Excavation Safety System (TESS) to locate underground utilities within public right-of-ways and easements at the site. This proposal does not include services associated with the location of underground utilities on private property. Because some of the alignment passes through private property, we must rely on the Client to notify us of any utilities located on private property. We cannot be responsible for damage to private utilities, which are not made aware to us. Terracon will take reasonable efforts to reduce damage to the property, such as rutting of the ground surface. However, it should be understood that in the normal course of our work some such disturbance could occur in unpaved areas. We have not budgeted to restore the site beyond backfilling our boreholes. If there are any restrictions or special requirements regarding this site or exploration, these should be known prior to commencing field work. 2.2 Conditions/Items to be provided by Client Items to be provided by the Client include a site plan with engineered bar scale illustrating existing features and proposed improvements, existing and final grading plans, the right-of-entry to the properties to conduct the exploration, and an awareness and/or location of any private subsurface utilities existing in the area. Proposal for Geotechnical Engineering Services Rivery Blvd Extension & Clay St Realignment ■ Georgetown, Texas June 3, 2014 ■ Terracon Proposal No. P96140663 Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 4 2.3 Laboratory Testing The samples will be tested in our laboratory to determine physical engineering characteristics. Testing will be performed under the direction of a geotechnical engineer and may include visual classification, moisture content, dry density, Atterberg limit, grain size analyses, sulfate content tests, and strength tests (such as unconfined compression and/or calibrated penetrometer), as appropriate. 2.4 Engineering Analysis and Report The results of our field and laboratory programs will be evaluated by a professional geotechnical engineer licensed in the State of Texas. Based on the results of our evaluation, an engineering report will be prepared that details the results of the testing performed, provides boring logs, and a diagram of the site/boring layout. The report will include the following:  Boring location plan.  Boring logs with subsurface stratification.  Subsurface exploration procedures.  Encountered subsurface conditions.  Summarized laboratory data.  Groundwater levels observed during and at completion of drilling.  Options for possible roadway sections and component thicknesses (using TxDOT and/or AASHTO methodologies).  Roadway component material recommendations.  Lateral earth pressure and drainage for site retaining walls.  Subgrade preparation / earthwork recommendations. 2.5 Schedule We can generally begin the field exploration program within about 1 to 2 weeks after receipt of our signed Agreement for Services, if site access, traffic control, and weather conditions permit. We estimate the final geotechnical report can be completed within about 3 to 4 weeks after the borings are completed (about 5 to 6 weeks after written project authorization). In situations where information is needed prior to submittal of our report, we can provide preliminary information for specific project requirements after we have completed our field and laboratory programs. 3.0 COMPENSATION For the scope of geotechnical services outlined in this proposal, we estimate the following costs.  Geotechnical Engineering Report ................................................................... $10,500  Traffic Control Services (up to two days of service) .......................................... $2,000 EXHIBIT B: FEE SCHEDULE SUMMARY Page 1 of 3 KPA IG TERRACON LE MA TOTAL 1.PROJECT MANAGEMENT/COORDINATION 19,880.00$ 19,880.00$ 2.RIGHT OF WAY 18,460.00$ 75,798.00$ 261,500.00$ 355,758.00$ 3.FINAL DESIGN 252,055.00$ 24,022.00$ 17,900.00$ 10,000.00$ 303,977.00$ 4.BID DOCUMENT PREPARATION 19,030.00$ 19,030.00$ Project Fees: TDLR Project Registration & Review Fee 490.00$ TDLR Project Inspection Fee 375.00$ TCEQ SCS Assessment Fee 6,600.00$ Project Fees Total 7,465.00$ PROJECT TOTAL 309,425.00$ 99,820.00$ 17,900.00$ 10,000.00$ 261,500.00$ 706,110.00$ Subconsultants: Topographic Surveying/ROW Documents - Inland Geodetics (IG) Environmental (ESA Phase I & Geological Assessment) - Terracon Geotechnical Investigation - Terracon Rivery Blvd/Williams Drive Signal Design - Lee Engineering (LE) ROW Acquisition & Appriasal Services - Maples & Associates (MA) COST SUMMARY Summary of Costs September 2, 2014 Summary of Professional Services Fee Estimate by Consultant Rivery Boulevard Extension PSE EXHIBIT B: FEE SCHEDULE KPA Page 2 of 3 Principal Project Manager Project Engineer Graduate Engineer (EIT) Senior Eng Tech (CAD) Eng Tech (CAD)Clerical Fee Schedule 200.00$ 160.00$ 135.00$ 105.00$ 85.00$ 75.00$ 55.00$ 1.PROJECT MANAGEMENT/COORDINATION a.Coordination/Project Support with Inland Geodetics (Topographic Surveys)3,880.00$ 2 4 4 8 4 12 4 38 b.Coordination/Project Support with Terracon Consultants for ESA Phase I 1,890.00$ 1 1 2 4 2 6 4 20 c.Coordination/Project Support with Terracon Consultants for Geotechnical Investigations 3,310.00$ 1 2 6 8 2 10 4 33 d.Coordination/Project Support with Lee Engineering for Traffic Signal Design 3,420.00$ 1 4 4 8 8 4 4 33 e.Project Review Meeting with Staff (30%)1,215.00$ 2 2 1 2 2 9 f.Project Review Meeting with Staff (60%)1,710.00$ 2 2 2 4 4 14 g.Project Review Meeting with Staff (95%)2,055.00$ 2 2 3 6 4 17 h.Final Project Review/Submittal Meeting with Staff 2,400.00$ 2 2 4 8 4 20 Subtotal Project Management/Coordination 19,880.00$ 13 19 26 48 16 46 16 184 2.RIGHT OF WAY a.Update Existing ROW Schematic/Property Ownership Map 1,320.00$ 1 2 4 2 4 13 b.Provide Project Support/Documentation to City ROW Agent 8,860.00$ 1 10 14 24 10 24 83 c.Project Coordination with Inland Geodetics for Metes & Bounds 8,280.00$ 4 8 12 20 8 24 76 Subtotal Right of Way 18,460.00$ 5 19 28 48 20 52 0 172 3.FINAL DESIGN A. ROADWAY DESIGN a.Roadway Geometric Design 21,810.00$ 10 22 34 48 36 48 198 b.Typical Sections 16,620.00$ 8 18 24 40 20 40 150 c.Plan & Profile Sheets - Roadway 29,190.00$ 18 24 48 66 24 84 264 d.Intersection Layouts/Roundabout Design 24,340.00$ 8 14 40 64 28 80 234 e.Cross Sections for Roadway 13,850.00$ 4 12 24 32 18 40 130 f.Multi-Use Trail Facility 11,070.00$ 4 10 18 24 12 36 104 Subtotal Roadway Design 116,880.00$ 52 100 188 274 138 328 0 1,080 B. DRAINAGE a.Hydraulic & Hydrologic Calculations 5,290.00$ 2 4 8 20 2 12 48 b.Drainage Area Map 4,760.00$ 2 2 8 18 2 12 44 c.Hydraulic Data Sheets 4,620.00$ 2 8 16 4 16 46 d.Storm Sewer Plan and Profile 14,450.00$ 4 12 24 32 18 48 138 e.Detention/Water Quality Pond 10,960.00$ 4 8 18 24 18 32 104 f.Detention/Water Quality Pond Cross Sections 11,985.00$ 4 10 15 24 24 40 117 g.Drainage Details 7,670.00$ 2 8 12 18 8 24 72 h.WPAP for the Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone 4,260.00$ 2 4 8 10 4 10 38 Subtotal Drainage Design 63,995.00$ 20 50 101 162 80 194 0 607 C. WATER LINE a.Develop Plan/Profile for waterline 12,100.00$ 4 8 18 32 18 36 116 b.Water Line Details 5,870.00$ 2 4 8 18 6 18 56 c.Roadway Crossing Design 4,880.00$ 1 4 8 18 2 12 45 d.Design connections 4,800.00$ 1 4 8 14 6 12 45 Subtotal Water Line Design 27,650.00$ 8 20 42 82 32 78 0 262 September 2, 2014 Summary of Professional Services Fee Estimate by Employee/Position Category Rivery Boulevard Extension PSE TOTAL Kasberg, Patrick & Associates, LP (KPA)Total Fee Summary of Hours Scope Items EXHIBIT B: FEE SCHEDULE KPA Page 3 of 3 Principal Project Manager Project Engineer Graduate Engineer (EIT) Senior Eng Tech (CAD) Eng Tech (CAD)Clerical Fee Schedule 200.00$ 160.00$ 135.00$ 105.00$ 85.00$ 75.00$ 55.00$ September 2, 2014 Summary of Professional Services Fee Estimate by Employee/Position Category Rivery Boulevard Extension PSE TOTAL Kasberg, Patrick & Associates, LP (KPA)Total Fee Summary of Hours Scope Items D. WASTEWATER LINE DESIGN a.Develop Plan/Profile for Wastewater Extension 8,800.00$ 2 8 16 22 10 24 82 b.Prepare Connection Details 4,760.00$ 1 4 8 12 8 12 45 c.SCS Plan & Report Preparation 4,530.00$ 1 4 8 12 4 12 2 43 d.SCS Plan & Report TCEQ Submittal, Review & Incorporation of Comments 3,100.00$ 1 2 4 8 4 10 2 31 Subtotal Wastewater Design 21,190.00$ 5 18 36 54 26 58 4 201 E. INCIDENTAL DESIGN a.Erosion Control Design For Project 4,170.00$ 1 2 6 12 8 12 41 b.Striping Plan 3,930.00$ 1 2 4 8 8 18 41 c.Dry Utility Conduit Plan 2,770.00$ 2 4 8 2 12 28 e.Traffic Control Plan 6,160.00$ 2 4 12 14 8 18 58 d.Miscellaneous Detail 5,310.00$ 2 4 6 12 10 18 52 Subtotal Incidental Design 22,340.00$ 6 14 32 54 36 78 0 220 Subtotal Final Design 252,055.00$ 91 202 399 626 312 736 4 2,370 3.BID DOCUMENT PREPARATION a.Project Technical Specification Development 9,180.00$ 4 10 18 32 18 82 b.Project Bid Schedule Preparation & OPC 6,460.00$ 4 8 12 20 12 56 c.Prepare Plan Sets for Bidding 3,390.00$ 2 2 4 8 4 18 38 Subtotal Bid Documents 19,030.00$ 10 20 34 60 0 4 48 176 Total Fee Principal Senior Engineer Project Engineer Graduate Engineer (EIT) Senior Eng Tech (CAD) Eng Tech (CAD)Clerical TOTAL 1.PROJECT MANAGEMENT/COORDINATION 19,880.00$ 13 19 26 48 16 46 16 184 2.RIGHT OF WAY 18,460.00$ 5 19 28 48 20 52 0 172 3.FINAL DESIGN 252,055.00$ 91 202 399 626 312 736 4 2,370 4.BID DOCUMENT PREPARATION 19,030.00$ 10 20 34 60 0 4 48 176 309,425.00$ 119 260 487 782 348 838 68 2,902 Summary of Labor & Associated Cost TOTAL 01 R389424 02 R389425 03 R042325 23 R042326 04 R04233505 R042334 06 R040325 08 R042332 07 R042333 09 R042331 10 R042330 11 R042328 12 R042329 13 R042327 14 R042336 15 R042337 16 R042338 17 R042339 18 R042343 19 R042344 20 R042342 21 R042341 22 R042340 24 R042345 25 R042346 26 R042347 27 R042348 28 R042349 29 R042350 30 R042351 31 R042352 32 R042353 33 R042354 34 R042355 35 R042356 36 R042357 37 R042358 38 R042359 39 R042360 40 R042361 41 R042362 42 R042363 43 R042365 44 R042366 45 R306705 46 R042390 47 R306706 49 R042388 48 R042387 50 R042386 51 R040360 52 R042385 53 R042384 54 R040386 55 R04238356 R04238258 R042381 57 R040332 59 R04238060 R04237962 R042378 61 R344520 63 R04237764 R042376 65 R042375 66 R04237467 R04237368 R042372 69 R042371 70 R042370 71 R042369 73 R040335 75 R351835 74 R472670 77 R09792378 R04033979 R040338 80 R45417381 R04038482 R311096 83 R083089 76 R498680 85 R498679 84 R498678 72 R099568 I. H . 3 5 F R O N T A G E I. H . 3 5 M A I N F O N T A N A D R WESTWO O D CLAY S T PARK LN S H A N N O N L N J A N I S W . C E N T R A L D R WILLIAMS DRIVE RI V E R Y B L V D NORT H W E S T B L V D (BY O T H E R S ) RIV E R Y B L V D FIRE STATION #2 01 R389424 02 R389425 03 R042325 23 R042326 04 R04233505 R042334 06 R040325 08 R042332 07 R042333 09 R042331 10 R042330 11 R042328 12 R042329 13 R042327 14 R042336 15 R042337 16 R042338 17 R042339 18 R042343 19 R042344 20 R042342 21 R042341 22 R042340 24 R042345 25 R042346 26 R042347 27 R042348 28 R042349 29 R042350 30 R042351 31 R042352 32 R042353 33 R042354 34 R042355 35 R042356 36 R042357 37 R042358 38 R042359 39 R042360 40 R042361 41 R042362 42 R042363 43 R042365 44 R042366 45 R306705 46 R042390 47 R306706 49 R042388 48 R042387 50 R042386 51 R040360 52 R042385 53 R042384 54 R040386 55 R04238356 R04238258 R042381 57 R040332 59 R04238060 R04237962 R042378 61 R344520 63 R04237764 R042376 65 R042375 66 R04237467 R04237368 R042372 69 R042371 70 R042370 71 R042369 73 R040335 75 R351835 74 R472670 77 R09792378 R04033979 R040338 80 R45417381 R04038482 R311096 83 R083089 76 R498680 85 R498679 84 R498678 72 R099568 3.5± AC. 2.2± AC. 12.8± AC. 3.1± AC. 0.3± AC. 3.3± AC. 2.0± AC. NOTE: DIMENSIONS ARE TO B.O.C. UNLESS OTHER WISE NOTED. R52.5 R45 0 . 0 R24.5 2 6 . 0 3 . 0 R5 0 0 . 0 R500.0 R500.0 R500.0 92.0 12.013.013.02.010.02.0 26.0 14.0 N O R T H CONSULTING ENGINEERS GEORGETOWN, TEXAS 78628 KASBERG, PATRICK & ASSOCIATES, LP RIVERY BOULEVARD EXTENSION PRELIMINARY CORRIDOR STUDY MAP EXHIBIT - CFIRM REGISTRATION NUMBER F-510 FI L E - P : \ G e o r g e t o w n \ 2 0 1 2 \ 2 0 1 2 - 1 2 9 R i v e r y B l v d E x t \ c a d \ p r e l i m i n a r y \ b a s e \ R I V E R Y B L V D - 2 0 1 3 - 0 4 - 2 4 . d w g , L A Y O U T - R I V E R Y B L V D E X T E X H I B I T C 1 1 X 1 7 onJun 07, 2013 This document is released for the purpose of interim review under the authority of It is not to be used for purposes.construction, bidding or permit Alvin R. Sutton P.E. 96530 TEXAS GEORGETOWN CONSULTING ENGINEERS GEORGETOWN, TEXAS 78628 KASBERG, PATRICK & ASSOCIATES, LP RIVERY BOULEVARD EXTENSION PRELIMINARY CORRIDOR STUDY MAP EXHIBIT - CFIRM REGISTRATION NUMBER F-510 FI L E - P : \ G e o r g e t o w n \ 2 0 1 2 \ 2 0 1 2 - 1 2 9 R i v e r y B l v d E x t \ c a d \ p r e l i m i n a r y \ b a s e \ R I V E R Y B L V D - 2 0 1 3 - 0 4 - 2 4 . d w g , L A Y O U T - R I V E R Y B L V D E X T E X H I B I T C 1 1 X 1 7 City of Georgetown, Texas SUBJECT: Consideration and possible action to initiate the finding process for the Pecan Center economic development project that will include street improvements at the Airport Road/Lakeway Drive intersection, along Airport Road and an internal collector (Pecan Center Drive) that will eventually connect to Aviation Drive. – Edward G. Polasek, AICP Transportation Services Director and Micki Rundell, CFO. ITEM SUMMARY: The Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation maintains an unreserved funds balance and surplus sales tax revenue in each year’s budget for potential economic development projects. The City has received a request for GTEC funding to support on-site and off-site transportation related improvements for the proposed Pecan Center development that will be located North of Lakeway Drive between Airport Road and IH 35. The proposed 160 acre development will be developed between 2015 and 2019, and will support retail and employment center type development based on existing zoning of the site. Attached is an Economic Study provided by the applicant as well as a preliminary cost summary of the on-site public improvements. The on-site roadway improvement will include a major collector street (Pecan Center Drive) which will eventually connect Lakeway Drive to Aviation Drive, the current cost estimate is $1,758,039 for the portion on the subject tract. While a Traffic Impact Analysis will be required as the project moves through the development process, staff and the applicant agree that the following off-site roadway improvements are necessary in order to develop the project: · Intersection of Lakeway Drive and Airport Road must be improved to ultimate design standard of 4-lane divided with left turn lanes at all legs of the intersection, with a free right hand turn lane and signalized once warrants are met at a current cost estimate of $1,200,000. · Airport Road must be improved to ultimate design of 4 lane divided with a right turn deceleration lane and left turn bay for southbound Airport Drive if separation is met from the Lakeway Drive intersection at a current cost estimate of $3,030,000. Before holding the public hearing and making a final decision on funding the project, the Board must make findings regarding the project. The findings are four step process to determine if the project is or is not eligible for 4B funding. Once found eligible, State law requires the GTEC Board to provide public notice and hold a public hearing on the proposed projects to be funded with unallocated 4B sales tax revenue. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Initiate the finding process for the Pecan Center Commercial project, to be completed at the October meeting, at which time a decision will be made to complete the findings, begin the budget amendment process and set a public hearing. FINANCIAL IMPACT: If the budget amendment process should begin in October, staff would recommend at most the Internal Roadway and Airport/Lakeway Intersection improvements in FY 2015. The Airport Road Improvements would be recommended for programming in FY 2016. SUBMITTED BY: Edward G. Polasek, AICP ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Pecan Center Commercial Roadway Backup Material Pecan Branch Preliminary Cost Summary Backup Material Pecan Branch Economic Study Backup Material Pecan Branch Area Image Backup Material Internal Roadway (Pecan Center Drive) Erosion/Sediment Control $35,889 Site Prep/Clearing $18,365 Roadway $970,000 Storm Drain (full project) $1,030,500 Storm Drain (roadway related) $365,500 $365,500 CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $1,389,754 Contingencies (10%) $138,975 Surveying & Staking (1.5%) $20,846 Engineering (15%) $208,463 TOTAL Eligible for GTEC $1,758,039 Airport/Lakeway Intersection Signal Design and Installation $300,000 Roadway/turn lane improvements (750 LF) $680,000 Utility Relocation $75,500 Construction Admin $42,500 Contingencies (15%) $102,000 Total $1,200,000 Airport Road Improvements (2,000 LF) Construction $2,219,591 Pre-Construction $443,918 Utility Relocation $75,000 Construction Admin $70,001 Contingencies (10%) $221,490 Total $3,030,000 Pecan Center Commercial Roadway Preliminary Cost Estimate 9/11/2014 Erosion/Sedimentation Controls Roadway Project Utility Project Item # Item Description Unit Price Cost Cost ESC-1 Silt Fence 2,000 L.F. $3.50 $7,000.00 ESC-2 Stabilized Construction Entrance 1 Ea. $2,000.00 $2,000.00 ESC-3 Rock Berm 1 L.S. $8,000.00 $8,000.00 ESC-4 Topsoil/Seeding in ROW 5,556 S.Y. $2.50 $13,888.89 ESC-5 SW3P Inspections 1 L.S. $5,000.00 $5,000.00 Total $35,888.89 $0.00 Site Pre/Clearing Item # Item Description Unit Price Cost Cost SPC-1 Clearing/Grubbing 3.7 acres $5,000.00 $18,365.47 Total $18,365.47 $0.00 Roads Item # Item Description Unit Price Cost Cost RD-1 Major Collector Streets (73' ROW/45' Pavement) 2,000 L.F. $180.00 $360,000.00 RD-2 Accelleration/Decelleration Lanes 3 Ea. $150,000.00 $450,000.00 RD-3 Sidewalks (5' Both Sides) 2,000 L.F. $30.00 $60,000.00 RD-4 Landscaping 1 L.S. $100,000.00 $100,000.00 Total $970,000.00 $0.00 Water Item # Item Description Unit Price Cost Cost W-1 12" C-900 SDR 21 PVC 2,000 L.F. $60.00 $120,000.00 W-2 12" Ductile Iron Fittings 2,000 Lbs $6.00 $12,000.00 W-3 12" Gate Valves 10 Ea. $2,500.00 $25,000.00 W-4 Single Water Services 7 Ea. $1,050.00 $7,350.00 W-5 Fire Hydrants 4 Ea. $3,800.00 $15,200.00 W-6 Wet Connection 1 Ea. $5,000.00 $5,000.00 Total $0.00 $184,550.00 Wastewater Item # Item Description Unit Price Cost Cost WW-1 8" DR 26 PVC (Onsite) 2,500 L.F. $60.00 $150,000.00 WW-2 8" DR 26 PVC (Offsite) 2,600 L.F. $60.00 $156,000.00 WW-3 4' Manholes 16 Ea. $5,000.00 $80,000.00 WW-4 Single Wastewater Services 7 Ea. $1,650.00 $11,550.00 WW-5 Roadway Bore 120 L.F. $400.00 $48,000.00 Total $0.00 $445,550.00 Storm Drain Item # Item Description Unit Price Cost Cost SD-1 24" RCP 300 L.F. $60.00 $18,000.00 SD-2 30" RCP 300 L.F. $75.00 $22,500.00 SD-3 Double Barrel 48" RCP 1,500 L.F. $300.00 $450,000.00 SD-4 Headwalls 2 Ea. $5,000.00 $10,000.00 SD-5 Curb Inlets 20 Ea. $4,000.00 $80,000.00 SD-6 Wet Pond (3.5 acres)1 Ea. $450,000.00 $450,000.00 Total $1,030,500.00 $0.00 $2,684,854.36 268,485.44 0.00 0.00 40,272.82 402,728.15 $3,396,340.77 Note: This is a preliminary cost summary based on similar work on the Georgetown are and not an actual cost quote. It has not been based on any engineering plans or survey. A revised and more accurate estimate can be provided after engineering plans have been prepared and/or actual construction bids have been received and tabulated. Quantity Quantity Quantity Quantity Quantity Quantity Pecan Branch Commercial Preliminary Cost Summary 9/3/2014 Surveying & Staking (1.5%): Engineering (15%): TOTAL: Construction Total: Contingencies (10%): Legal: Easements & Right of Way: PECAN BRANCH COMPLEX 2015-2016-2017 2017-2018-2019 20%- 60%-100%20%- 50%- 100% North Phase South Phase Land Values 110 Ac $7.00 /SF $33,541,200 50 Ac $6.00 /SF $13,068,000 Building Values 900,000 SF $80.00 /SF 72,000,000 200,000 SF $80.00 /SF 16,000,000 TOTAL 105,541,200 29,068,000 GISD 57.84%1,465,088 403,512 City of Georgetown 18.16%460,067 126,711 County 24.00%607,833 167,409 Property Tax $2.40 /100 2,532,989 697,632 Gross Sales 900,000 SF $100.00 /sf/yr 90,000,000 200,000 SF $70.00 /sf/yr 14,000,000 90,000,000 14,000,000 Sales Tax 8.25%7,425,000 1,155,000 Sales Breakdown GO Expense 1.00% $900,000 $140,000 GTEC 0.50%$37,125 $70,000 GEDCO 0.125%$9,281 $17,500 Tax Relief 0.125%$9,281 $17,500 Streets 0.25%$18,563 $35,000 State of Texas 6.25%464,063 $875,000 TOTAL $1,438,313 $1,155,000 One Time Constructon Sales Tax 33%Taxable $1,960,200 $435,600 Jobs Retail 900,000 SF $1.00 per/1000 sf 900 Retail 100,000 SF $1.00 per/1000 sf 100 Office Manufactory 100,000 Sf per/500 sf 200 Retail Payroll 900 EA $26,000 per/person 23,400,000 Retail Payroll 100 EA $26,000 per/person 2,600,000 Office Payroll 200 EA $45,000 per/person 9,000,000 23,400,000 11,600,000 Utility Revenue $2.00 /sf/yr $1,800,000 $600,000 MIX OF USES NORTH PHASE 1 SOUTH PHASE 2 7.0%63,000 sf Hotel Motel 40.0%80,000 sf Office 0.5%4,500 sf Fueling 27.7%55,400 sf Manufactory 15.0%135,000 sf Grocery 5.0%10,000 sf Resturants 5.0%45,000 sf Fast Food 2.3%4,600 sf Fueling 8.0%72,000 sf Resturants 10.0%20,000 sf Fast Food 15.0%135,000 sf Wholesale Goods 10.0%20,000 sf Entertainment 10.0%90,000 sf Sporting Goods 5.0%10,000 sf Other Services 6.0%54,000 sf Entertainment 100.0% 200,000 sf TOTAL Phase 2 3.0%27,000 sf Financial 4.0%36,000 sf Home Furnishing 1.0%9,000 sf Cards, Books, Stationary 4.0%36,000 sf Women's Fashion 4.0%36,000 sf Office Supplies 4.0%36,000 sf Womens Fashion 1.0%9,000 sf Auto Supplies 1.0%9,000 sf Health, Bath and Beauty 5.0%45,000 sf Other Services 1.0%9,000 sf Shoes & Footwear 1.0%9,000 sf Phones and Electronics 1.0%9,000 sf Electronics & Technology 2.0%18,000 sf Mens Fashion 1.0%9,000 sf Wine and Spirits 0.5%4,500 sf Jewelry and Watches 0.5%4,590 sf Music and Movies 1.0%9,000 sf Home Appliances 0.5%4,500 sf Childrens Toys 0.03 27,000 sf Health Fitness 100.0%900,000 sf Total Phase ! NORTH PHASE 1 Accessories 7.0%63,000 sf Hotel Motel 0.5%4,500 sf Fueling 15.0%135,000 sf Grocery 5.0%45,000 sf Fast Food 8.0%72,000 sf Resturants 15.0%135,000 sf Wholesale Goods 10.0%90,000 sf Sporting Goods 6.0%54,000 sf Entertainment 3.0%27,000 sf Financial 4.0%36,000 sf Home Furnishing 1.0%9,000 sf Cards, Books, Stationary 4.0%36,000 sf Women's Fashion 4.0%36,000 sf Office Supplies 4.0%36,000 sf Womens Fashion 1.0%9,000 sf Auto Supplies 1.0%9,000 sf Health, Bath and Beauty 5.0%45,000 sf Other Services 1.0%9,000 sf Shoes & Footwear 1.0%9,000 sf Phones and Electronics 1.0%9,000 sf Electronics & Technology 2.0%18,000 sf Mens Fashion 1.0%9,000 sf Wine and Spirits 0.5%4,500 sf Jewelry and Watches 0.5%4,590 sf Music and Movies 1.0%9,000 sf Home Appliances 0.5%4,500 sf Childrens Toys 0.03 27000.00 Health Fitness 100.0% 900,000 sf Total Phase ! City of Georgetown, Texas SUBJECT: Consideration and possible action to develop the Mays Street (Rabbit Hill Road) extension project extension as part of the South Georgetown Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone –Edward G. Polasek, AICP Transportation Services Director and Micki Rundell, Chief Financial Officer. ITEM SUMMARY: In May 2014, the Georgetown City Council approved the creation of the South Georgetown Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone (TIRZ) to provide public infrastructure necessary to encourage high quality office, commercial, and retail development at the Intersection of IH 35 and Westinghouse Road. In order to accelerate the development of this area and to ensure the quality and type of development the City desires, the City plans to move forward with proactively building the necessary infrastructure improvements, thus encouraging capital investment and creation of new jobs. In February 2014, the GTEC Board recommended approval of the TIRZ to City Council and initiated professional engineering services to develop the schematic and 30% construction plans and preliminary estimate for the extension of Mays Street (Rabbit Hill Road) from Westinghouse Road southward to its intersection with Oakmont Drive/Teravista Parkway in the amount of $196,000. Attached are the preliminary cost estimate and ROW map for the proposed extension. In order to keep the project moving forward staff will have to negotiate terms of construction with the City of Round Rock. Before that is done, we would like to proceed with project development to 95% plans/estimates, and procure all adequate ROW, or create a shovel ready document/bid package that will or will not include the Round Rock portion based on their willingness to participate in the construction phase. Round Rock staff is taking this item to their 4B Board this month as well. The elements of developing a shovel ready project are the” ROW Acquisition” and “Eng., Mat’l Testing and Permitting” lines items, minus mat’l testing, from the Preliminary Estimate of Probable Construction Cost. If GTEC agrees to fund this element, at $1,809,630, or the entire project at $10,638,371.60, it will be incumbent upon staff to bring back a TIRZ reimbursement agreement for the City of Georgetown portion of the roadway and an Interlocal Agreement with the City of Round Rock for their portion of the roadway, before we move forward beyond the 30% plans already underway. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Proceed with project development to Construction ready plans and estimates and secure all necessary ROW for the project. Provide GTEC with a TIRZ Reimbursement Agreement and Interlocal Agreement with the City of Round Rock to fund their respective portions of the roadway, and initiate a budget amendment process in October. FINANCIAL IMPACT: It is anticipated that GTEC may issue bonds for this project and then be repaid through the TIRZ, once development has occurred. In the interim, GTEC may need to fund the related debt service until the TIRZ revenue is established. SUBMITTED BY: Edward G. Polasek, AICP ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Mays Street Exhibit Exhibit Mays Street Preliminary Backup Material with 16" water line alig n ment. in this area an d wo uld help Plans c all for a water valve 4 4.8 67.2 for future TS box? pvc riser pipe in this are a. Mig ht be Goo gle Earth stre et vie w sh o ws a Traffic sig nal lines dra wn per plan. with 16" water line alig n ment. in this area an d wo uld help Plans c all for a water valve 4 4.8 67.2 for future TS box? pvc riser pipe in this are a. Mig ht be Goo gle Earth stre et vie w sh o ws a Traffic sig nal lines dra wn per plan. #114 #114 #114 #114 #102 #101 #103 #107 #108 #109 #110 #111 #112 #113 #117 #116 #115 #307 #306 #305 ONLY O N L Y ONLY W E S TI N G H O U S E R O A D CONCRETE PAVEMENT PARK CENTRAL BLVD. RABBIT HILL ROAD W E S TI N G H O U S E R O A D NORTH TS BOX TSBOX TSBOX TSBOX P O T 1 0 0 + 0 0. 0 0 100+00 P C 1 0 1 + 8 4. 2 7 105+00 P T 1 0 8 + 2 5 .3 2 110+00 P C 1 1 0 + 7 0 .0 2 115+00 P T 1 1 7 + 5 0 . 0 8 P C 1 1 8 + 3 0 . 7 4 120+00 PT124+59.95 12 5+00 13 0+00 13 5+00 14 0+00 PC 143+21.95 1 4 5 + 0 0 150+00 P T154 + 55.75 155+00 160+00 165+00 P O T168 + 75.53 ℄ 14.5'71' (FOC-FOC)14.5' LANE LANELANELANE5'5' SWLK SWLK 100' (TYP) 2'2'2'2' 20'12'12'12'12' MEDIAN: LOG-LOG EXISTING/PROPOSED ROW PGL 2.0%2.0% PROP ROW EXIST/ ROW EXIST/PROP TYPICAL SECTION PRELIMINARY SUBJECT TO CHANGE PRELIMINARY SUBJECT TO CHANGE REGISTRATION NO: 1741 CITY OF GEORGETOWN MAYS STREET EXTENSION PRELIMINARY EXHIBIT JUSTIN A. WORD 92712 OR PERMIT PURPOSES. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION, BIDDING, FOR INTERIM REVIEW ONLY ENGINEER P.E. No.DATE 9/5/2014 FILED: DECEMBER 11, 2007 O.P.R.W.C.T. DOCUMENT NO: 2007102276 DESCRIPTION FILED: JUNE 11, 2013 DOCUMENT NO. 2013054014 CHARLES TERRY ISAACKS CALLED 76.27156 ACRES FILED: AUGUST 1, 2011 DOCUMENT NO. 2011050295 NEW WESTINGHOUSE INVESTORS, LLC (TRACT ONE) CALLED 113.49 ACRES FILED: JULY 12, 2013 O.P.R.W.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 2013065235 WESTINGHOUSE APARTMENTS BLOCK A LOT 1 FILED: NOVEMBER 29, 1988 P.R.W.C.T. CABINET J, SLIDES 181-182 PARK CENTRAL ONE SECTION 1 LOT 2 FEETSCALE 0100 100 20050 SCALE: FILED: MARCH 5, 2014 O.P.R.W.C.T DOCUMENT 2014014737 A REPLAT OF LOT 1A AND 5A, BLOCK B, SECTION 4 CPG PARTNERS COMMERCIAL TRACT FILED: OCTOBER 3, 2012 O.P.R.W.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 2012082150 KDR EQUITIES, LLC CALLED 19.4894 ACRES FILED: MARCH 1, 2005 O.P.R.W.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 2005014912 TOOLMEN CORPORATION CALLED 11.058 ACRES FILED: MAY 18, 2001 O.P.R.W.C.T DOCUMENT NO. 2001034688 AND VERA R. ANDERSON LIVING TRUST OF THE JOE D. ANDERSON THE TRUSTEES, AND SUCCESSOR TRUSTEES CALLED 82.060 ACRES FILED: MAY 18, 2001 O.P.R.W.C.T DOCUMENT NO. 2001034689 AND VERA R. ANDERSON LIVING TRUST OF THE JOE D. ANDERSON THE TRUSTEES, AND SUCCESSOR TRUSTEES (TRACT NO. 1) CALLED 10.00 ACRES FILED: JULY 12, 2013 O.P.R.W.C.T DOCUMENT NO. 2013065235 WESTINGHOUSE APARTMENTS BLOCK A LOT 1 FILED: JANUARY 11, 2005 O.P.R.W.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 2005003124 CELEBRATION CHURCH CALLED 59.56 ACRES FILED: MAY 24, 2007 P.R.W.C.T. CABINET DD, SLIDES 116-117 TERAVISTA SECTION 32 PHASE TWO 1" = 100' H STA. 103+41 BEGIN PROJECT STA. 165+00 END PROJECT TNOMKAO .D V L B A T S IV A R E T W E S TI N G H O U S E R D. RABBIT HILL RD. 7-4'X2' MBC CULVERT 1 2-42" RCP EXISTING CULVERT PARK CENTRAL 1 0 0 ' ( T Y P ) E X IS T . R O W ~ EXIST ROW EXIST ROW 75X44CITY OF GEORGETOWN EXISTING DETENTION POND PROPERTY LINES 8 6 4 ' R 7 6 5 ' R CONTOURS CAPCOG 10-FT SURVEY CONTOURS MA YS ST. 800 810 820 8 3 0 8 4 0 8 5 0 8 6 0 8 7 0 8 8 0 8 9 0 9 0 0 9 1 0 92 0 930 940 APPROXIMATE DISTANCE 1172' APPROXIMATE DISTANCE 1410' E XIS T R O W E XIS T R O W EXIST ROW EXIST ROW 1 0 0 ' ( T Y P ) 100' PR O P. R O W 1-5'X3' SBC CULVERT 2 2-5'X3' MBC CULVERT 3 PROPOSED RO W PROPOSED RO W APPROXIMATE DISTANCE 715' APPROXIMATE DISTANCE 470' APPROXIMATE DISTANCE 1900' APPROXIMATE DISTANCE 701' FILED: NOVEMBER 29, 2005 P.R.W.C.T. CABINET BB, SLIDES 60-61 CPG PARTNERS COMMERCIAL TRACT SECTION 5 BLOCK C LOT 1 4-5'X3' MBC CULVERT 3 T O I N T E R S T A T E 35 DEVELOPMENT. COORDINATION WITH ADJACENT SUBJECT TO CHANGE PENDING AND DETENTION POND LOCATION. ANTICIPATED 2 ACRE WATER QUALITY CITY LIMIT BOUNDARY CITY OF ROUND ROCK PRELIMINARY ADDITIONAL ROW (NOT SHOWN) MAY BE REQUIRED ALONG RABBIT HILL ROAD. SHALL NOT BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION, BIDDING, PERMITTING, PLATTING OR APPRAISALS. DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS ARE SHOWN FOR REPRESENTATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND LOCATION OF PROPOSED ROADWAY AND RIGHT-OF-WAY IS APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE. Roadway Mays Street Limits: Bass Pro/Teravista to Westinghouse County:Williamson Description: New location 4-lane divided Arterial Length:6,100 FT 9/9/2014 Spec Desc Code Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount 100 2002 PREP ROW 61 STA $1,500.00 $91,500.00 110 2001 EXCAVATION (RDWY)10,538 CY $10.00 $105,380.00 132 2003 EMBANKMENT (FINAL)(ORD COMP)(TYB)27,798 CY $7.00 $194,586.00 160 2003 FURNISHING AND PLACING TOPSOIL (4")19,803 SY $1.50 $29,704.50 164 2035 SEEDING 39,606 SY $0.25 $9,901.50 247 2044 FL BS (CMP IN PLC) (TY A GR 4) (FNAL POS)19,835 CY $30.00 $595,061.67 247 2044 FL BS (CMP IN PLC) (TY A GR 4) (FNAL POS) - SUB GRADE 19,835 CY $30.00 $595,061.67 310 2005 PRIME COAT (MC-30 OR AE-P)7,934 GAL $4.50 $35,703.70 3267 2047 D - GR HMA (QCQA) TY - C SAC - A PG70 - 22 (Layer 1)4,002 TON $105.00 $420,218.52 3267 2050 D - GR HMA (QCQA) TY - C PG70 - 22 (Layer 2)4,002 TON $105.00 $420,218.52 3267 2011 D - GR HMA (QCQA) TY - B PG64-22 (Layer 3)4,002 TON $75.00 $300,156.08 432 2066 RIPRAP (CONC) (CL B)100 CY $350.00 $35,000.00 502 2001 BARC, SIGN, AND TRAF HAND 14 MO $1,500.00 $21,000.00 529 2004 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER (TY II)24,400 LF $15.00 $366,000.00 530 2010 DRIVEWAYS (CONC)333 SY $60.00 $20,000.00 531 2015 CONC SIDEWALK (4")6,778 SY $45.00 $305,000.00 531 2005 CURB RAMP 10 EA $1,250.00 $12,500.00 423 2001 RETAINING WALL (MSE)14,000 SF $40.00 $560,000.00 450 2071 TRAFFIC RAIL (TY C402)1,200 LF $250.00 $300,000.00 ROADWAY SUBTOTAL $4,416,992.15 464 2003 RC PIPE (CL III) (18")2,379 LF $45.00 $107,055.00 464 2005 RC PIPE (CL III) (24")3,965 LF $60.00 $237,900.00 464 2009 RC PIPE (CL III) (36")1,586 LF $90.00 $142,740.00 465 MANHOLE 5 EA $4,500.00 $22,500.00 465 CURB INLET (10')31 EA $4,500.00 $137,250.00 462 2003 CONC BOX CULV (4 FT X 2 FT)770 LF $250.00 $192,500.00 462 2007 CONC BOX CULV (5 FT X 3 FT)770 LF $300.00 $231,000.00 466 2328 WINGWALL (PW-1)(HW=5 FT)8 EA $10,000.00 $80,000.00 STORM SEWER SUBTOTAL $1,150,945.00 416 2029 DRILL SHAFT (RDWY ILL POLE) (30 IN)277 LF $175.00 $48,522.73 610 2022 INS RD IL AM (TY SA) 40S-8 (.25 KW)S 28 EA $3,000.00 $83,181.82 618 2018 CONDUIT (PVC) (SCHD 40)6,100 LF $8.00 $48,800.00 620 2011 ELEC CONDR (NO. 8) BARE 6,100 LF $1.00 $6,100.00 620 2012 ELEC CONDR (NO. 8) INSULATED 12,200 LF $1.00 $12,200.00 624 2008 GROUND BOX 10 EA $750.00 $7,500.00 628 2038 ELC SRV TY A 240/480 100 (SS)SS(E)GC(O)1 EA $5,500.00 $5,500.00 ILLUMINATION SUBTOTAL $211,804.55 PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST MAYS STREET EXTENSION ROADWAY STORM SEWER/CULVERTS ILLUMINATION 9/9/2014 Spec Desc Code Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount LUMP SUM ITEMS DRAINAGE (MISC ITEMS)1 LS 3.00%$174,000.00 WATER QUALITY (POND)1 LS N/A $100,000.00 UTILITY ADJUSTMENTS 1 LS N/A $150,000.00 SIGNING 1 LS 1.00%$58,000.00 STRIPING 1 LS 1.00%$58,000.00 TRAFFIC SIGNAL (SETUP FOR FUTURE)1 LS N/A $30,000.00 EROSION CONTROL 1 LS 2.00%$116,000.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL (MISC ITEMS)1 LS 1.00%$58,000.00 MOBILIZATION (10%)1 LS 10.00% $653,000.00 LUMP SUM ITEM SUBTOTAL $1,397,000.00 CONSTRUCTION ITEMS TOTAL $7,176,741.70 ROW ACQUISITION KDR EQUITIES LLC 0.194 AC $435,600.00 $84,616.51 PARK CENTRAL ONE 0.648 AC $435,600.00 $282,313.40 CHARLES TERRY ISAACKS (POND)2.000 AC $435,600.00 $871,200.00 ROW ACQUISITION SUBTOTAL $1,238,129.91 ENG, MAT'L TESTING AND PERMITTING ANTICIPATED PS&E FEE (INCL'D BID/CONST. PHASE SUPPORT)1 LS N/A $550,000.00 TCEQ WPAP PERMIT APPLICATION 1 LS N/A $6,500.00 MAT'L TESTING, RFI RESPONSE, ADMIN & MISC CONST SURV 1 LS N/A $216,000.00 SUPPLEMENTAL TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY (ROADWAY, POND)1 LS N/A $15,000.00 ENG, MAT'L TEST AND PMT SUBTOTAL $787,500.00 $9,202,371.60 $1,436,000.00 Total Project Cost $10,638,371.60 CITY OF GEORGETOWN COST BREAKDOWN CONSTRUCTION COSTS (PRO RATA)$6,283,065.66 ROW COSTS (KDR, PARK CNTL, ISAACKS POND PRO RATA)$1,002,477.45 ENG, MAT'L TESTING AND PERMITTING (PRO RATA)$574,487.70 TOTAL PROJECT COST (COGT)$7,860,030.81 CITY OF ROUND ROCK COST BREAKDOWN CONSTRUCTION COSTS (PRO RATA)$2,329,676.03 ROW COSTS (ISAACKS POND PRO RATA)$235,652.46 ENG, MAT'L TESTING AND PERMITTING (PRO RATA)$213,012.30 TOTAL PROJECT COST (CORR)$2,778,340.79 OTHER ROW (DONATIONS ANTICIPATED) NEW WESTINGHOUSE INVESTORS 5.779 AC NORMA STEELE TRUST 0.080 AC CELEBRATION CHURCH 0.762 AC CHARLES TERRY ISAACKS (ROADWAY)3.093 AC CPG PARTNERS 0.044 AC PROJECT LENGTH DISTRIBUTION (6100 LF TOTAL) CITY OF ROUND ROCK 1650 LF 27.05% CITY OF GEORGETOWN 4450 LF 72.95% Subtotal Contingency (20% - Const $ Only)