Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda_MSTAB_02.02.2018Notice of Meeting for the Main Street Adv isory Board and the gov erning body of the City of Georgetown February 2, 2018 at 8:30 AM at Georgetown Public Library, Classroom, 402 W. 8th St. The City o f G eo rgeto wn is committed to comp lianc e with the Americans with Dis abilities Ac t (ADA). If yo u req uire as s is tanc e in participating at a p ublic meeting d ue to a disability, as d efined und er the ADA, reas onab le as s is tance, ad ap tatio ns , or acc o mmo d ations will b e provid ed up o n req uest. P leas e c o ntact the City Sec retary's Office, at leas t three (3) days prior to the sc hed uled meeting d ate, at (512) 930-3652 o r City Hall at 113 Eas t 8th Street fo r add itional info rmation; TTY us ers ro ute through Relay Texas at 711. Regular Session (This Regular S es s io n may, at any time, b e rec es s ed to convene an Exec utive S es s io n fo r any p urpose authorized b y the Op en Meetings Act, Texas Go vernment Co d e 551.) A Dis cus s ion and pos s ible actio n regarding approval of the January 12, 2018, board meeting minutes – Ta ylor Kid d , B oard Chair B Dis cus s ion and pos s ible actio n regarding Main S treet F açade & Sign Grant ap p licatio n – 706 S. Austin Avenue - K im McAuliffe, Downtown Develop men t Ma n a g er C Dis cus s ion and pos s ible actio n regarding Main S treet F açade & Sign Grant ap p licatio n – 604 S. Churc h Street - Kim McAuliffe, Downtown Develop men t Ma n a g er D Facade & S ign Grant Disc ussion and Pos s ible Actio n E Pro ject Team & Partner Updates F Staff Repo rt Adjournment Ad jo urnment CERTIFICATE OF POSTING I, Shelley No wling, C ity S ecretary fo r the C ity of Geo rgeto wn, Texas , d o hereby c ertify that this Notice of Meeting was p o s ted at City Hall, 113 E. 8th Street, a p lace read ily acc es s ible to the general p ublic at all times , on the ______ d ay o f __________________, 2018, at __________, and remained so p o s ted fo r at leas t 72 c o ntinuo us ho urs p receding the sc heduled time o f s aid meeting. ____________________________________ S helley No wling, City Sec retary Page 1 of 59 City of Georgetown, Texas Main Street Advisory Board February 2, 2018 SUBJECT: Disc ussion and p o s s ib le ac tion regard ing app ro val o f the January 12, 2018, b o ard meeting minutes – Taylor K idd, Boa rd Ch a ir ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: NA SUBMITTED BY: Kim McAuliffe ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Minutes Backup Material Page 2 of 59 The Main Street Advisory Board met on Friday, January 12, 2018 at 8:30 AM in the Classroom of the Georgetown Public Library located at 402 West 8th St., Georgetown, Texas The City of Georgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If you require assistance in participating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the ADA, reasonable assistance, adaptations, or accommodations will be provided upon request. Please contact the City Secretary’s Office, at least three (3) days prior to the scheduled meeting date, at (512) 930-3652 or City Hall at 113 East 8th Street for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. Taylor Kidd called the meeting to order at 8:34 AM. Board members in attendance were, T. Kidd, V. Jackimiec, T. Tallman, B. Nicholson, D. Gaume, and K. Curry. Staff in attendance, Michaela Dollar, Economic Development Director, Kim McAuliffe, Downtown Development Manager. Regular Session (This Regular session may, at any time, be recessed to convene an Executive Session for any purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code 551.) A. Discussion and possible action regarding approval of the December 8, 2017 board meeting minutes – Taylor Kidd, Board Chair Motion by B. Nicholson to approve meeting minutes, second by V. Jackimiec. Approved: 6-0 B. Discussion and possible action on an extension request for a Main Street Façade Grant application – Stromberg-Hoffman Building – Kim Mcauliffe, Downtown Development Manager K. McAuliffe read the letter supplied by the property owner asking for the extension and the reason for the delays with the project. Motion by K. Curry to approve the request, granting the extension to the end of the Fiscal Year, September 30, 2018, second by V. Jackimiec. Approved: 6-0 C. Façade & Sign Grant discussion and possible action The board discussed the feedback given from City Administration regarding the façade and sign grant account. At this time, additional funding is not available. The board will not accept façade grant requests until the start of the new fiscal year when funding becomes available. Signage grants will still be considered, as funding remains available for that use. The board will consider further discussion on refining the scoring process at a future meeting. No action taken D. Project Team & Partner Updates Swirl Project Team T. Tallman reported that the Swirl planning continues and we are just about 8 weeks away from the event. There is a lot of engagement on Facebook which is helping with ticket sales and exposure. No new sponsors, but a lot of new leads for potential sponsors. K. McAuliffe will follow up with potential sponsors in the coming weeks. Board members were encouraged to spread the word about ticket sales and group sales. Breakfast Bites Project Team The next Breakfast Bites will be in March. Topic details to come in February 2018. Minutes of a Meeting of the Main Street Advisory Board of the City of Georgetown, Texas Friday, January 12, 2018 Page 3 of 59 T. Kidd reported on the City Council meeting he attended last month. The development proposed for 204 E. 8th Street was discussed and was ultimately not approved by the Council. The vote was 6-1 with several members of the public speaking against the development on that site. E. Staff Report K. McAuliffe reported that K. Warren resigned from the board due to obligations with her new job. There will be three openings on the board for the Mayor to consider appointments in February. The board will have a gathering to thank V. Jackimiec and B. Nicholson for their service to the board. T. Kidd will help staff coordinate. K. McAuliffe reported on the THC Real Places Conference that she attended earlier in the week. Adjourn Motion by K. Curry, second by T. Tallman to adjourn the meeting. T. Kidd adjourned the meeting at 9:30 AM. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Approved by the Main Street Advisory Board on _____________________________ Date _______________________ _ _________________________________ Taylor Kidd, Board Chair Kim McAuliffe, Downtown Development Manager Page 4 of 59 City of Georgetown, Texas Main Street Advisory Board February 2, 2018 SUBJECT: Disc ussion and p o s s ib le ac tion regard ing Main Street Faç ad e & S ign Grant applic ation – 706 S. Aus tin Avenue - Kim McAu liffe, Down town Development Manager ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: Fac ad e Grant F und SUBMITTED BY: Kim McAuliffe ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Cover s heet Cover Memo Application Backup Material HARC application Backup Material Des ign Report from THC Backup Material Page 5 of 59 - COVERSHEET - MAIN STREET PROGRAM – FAÇADE & SIGN GRANT FUND 8:30 A.M. – FRIDAY, DECEMBER 8, 2017 THE LOVE BUILDING – 706 S. AUSTIN AVENUE AGENDA ITEM DESCRIPTION Discussion and possible action on a Main Street Facade Grant Fund application request for the property located at 706 S. Austin Avenue. The planned facade improvements include new paint for the façade to highlight the unique architectural details of the building, window repairs and replacement, and a new standing seam black metal awning. The Applicant has reviewed three bid options and elected to act as general contractor and have selected sub- contractors perform the required work, including construction labor and materials to install an awning across the front of the building at the first floor, labor and materials to repaint the front of the building, exterior trim removal to reconstruct new double-pane windows and replace wood rot, and 5 double-pane 1st floor windows, and 4 upper floor all wood sash windows. The estimate provided by applicant totals $57,718.78 and applicant seeks a facade grant for the maximum award of - $20,000. AGENDA ITEM DETAILS • Business Name: Kasper Family Trust • Applicant: Kristopher Kasper • Property Owner: Kasper Family Trust • Property Address: 706 S. Austin Avenue • Historical/Current Building Name: The Love Building • Legal Description: GEORGETOWN CITY OF, BLOCK 41, LOT 4(PT), ACRES .06 • Historic Overlay: Williamson County Courthouse Historic District • Application History: This is the first review for this application ECONOMIC IMPACT Extended hours of operation: Yes, the businesses located inside the property have extended business hours; Camille’s is open daily from 10-6 and the B&B upstairs is utilized during overnight hours. First Floor Use: Yes - The use is retail Occupy a Vacant Structure: No, the space is fully rented. Sales Subject to Sales Tax: The tenant is subject to 100% sales tax as a retail establishment. Capital Expenditures: The applicant is investing $57,000+ into the property for business improvements HISTORIC PRESERVATION Date of construction: 1883 2007 Historic Resources Survey Level of Priority: High Priority National Register Designation: Yes, contributing Texas Historical Commission Designation: None Page 6 of 59 LOCATION On the Square vs. Off the Square: The property faces the Courthouse and is considered to be On the Square STAFF ANALYSIS Staff has met with applicant and reviewed the application in its entirety. Staff finds that the request is complete and eligible for funding consideration by the Main Street Advisory Board. ATTACHMENTS Facade Application SUBMITTED BY Kim McAuliffe, Downtown Development Manager Page 7 of 59 L:\Division\ms\ed\MAIN STREET\Design & Infrastructure\Facade & Sign Grant Program\Grant Applications\Application Form\2017 Facade Sign Reimbursement Grant Application.doc 1 FAÇADE & SIGN REIMBURSEMENT GRANT PROGRAM Application Instructions If you have any downtown grant application questions, please contact the Downtown Development Manager at 512/930-2027. If you have any building or sign permit/historic preservation or design approval questions, please contact the Historic District Planner at 512/930-3581. The Georgetown Main Street Program is a preservation-driven, economic development organization. We utilize diverse community partners to create a destination downtown for everyone. As a downtown economic incentive, the Georgetown Main Street Program has designed the following façade & sign reimbursement grant program. FAÇADE & SIGN REIMBURSEMENT GRANT DETAILS (please read carefully): The Georgetown Main Street Façade & Sign Reimbursement Grant Program is set up as a single payment reimbursement to commercial property owners per building/business located in the Downtown Overlay District (see attached map), and in some situations, tenants. Facade grants are available on a 50/50 matching basis with a cap of $20,000 per grant ($40,000+ total project cost) Facade grant funds focus on exterior work on storefronts, roof and foundation work, fire sprinklers or suppression systems, and removal of barriers to public accessibility on commercial buildings and upper story residential buildings (as defined in Section 5.02.020 of the City’s Unified Development Code) located in the Downtown Overlay District. (Tax Incentives for Improving Accessibility information, https://www.ada.gov/archive/taxpack.pdf ) Sign grants are available on a 50/50 matching basis with a cap of $500 per grant ($1,000+ total grant project cost). Grant funds focus on signs which may include signboards, projecting signs and pedestrian signage (includes signage attached to the building such as window/door sign, hanging sign and awning/canopy sign) for commercial buildings located in the Downtown Overlay District. All sign grants are available throughout the year, on a first come, first serve basis until total funds are depleted. All façade grants are available throughout the year, awarded on a competitively scored criteria system with sliding scale to determine award amount. No grants will be awarded for work that has already been done or for work that is covered by insurance. All submitted work will be reviewed based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation (see page 6) and approved by the Georgetown Main Street Advisory Board before any eligible work may begin. If awarded a façade or sign reimbursement grant, any deviation from the approved grant project may result in the total or partial withdrawal of the grant. Page 8 of 59 L:\Division\ms\ed\MAIN STREET\Design & Infrastructure\Facade & Sign Grant Program\Grant Applications\Application Form\2017 Facade Sign Reimbursement Grant Application.doc 2 GRANT APPLICATION PROCESS: 1. Determine eligibility: Discuss project plans and determine grant eligibility with Downtown Development Manager. If requested, set up an appointment for free design assistance in selecting paint, fabrics, color schemes and/or sign materials for building façade and signs through the Texas Main Street Center’s Design Assistance Program. The Downtown Design Guidelines for the Downtown Overlay District should be a reference guide when making any design improvements to properties in the Downtown Overlay District. The Downtown Design Guidelines for the Downtown Overlay District are available from the City of Georgetown Planning office and online at, https://historic.georgetown.org/ 2. Complete facade & sign reimbursement grant application form and sign the agreement form. All grant applications must include a drawing/graphic by the Texas Main Street Architect, the project architect or contractor of the proposed grant work to be done. Color samples of all final paint selections and/or final fabric or sign color selections must be included with the application to be first approved by the Georgetown Historic and Architectural Review Commission (HARC). Obtain itemized written work estimates on all project work from contractors or project architects. Self-contracted work will be reimbursed for actual legitimate expenses, excluding labor. Digital photos of the building’s exterior, interior, roof or foundation where work is to be performed. 3. Return the completed grant application form with all original itemized work estimates, color samples, drawings and example sign material of the proposed work to the Downtown Development office at 809 MLK Jr. no later than 5 p.m. the Thursday prior to the first Friday of each month. 4. The grant approval process will include without limitation, the following: (a) All façade & sign grant projects must meet current building standards and codes, as well as building permit requirements. (b) The Georgetown HARC meets at 6 p.m. every fourth Thursday of the month, and all grant applicants are required to attend and present their grant reimbursement project to the commission for design review and approval if exterior changes, including new signage are being made. (c) Notwithstanding anything stated in this grant application to the contrary, final approval for any grant shall be vested in the Main Street Advisory Board. (d) The Main Street Advisory Board shall consider only grant applications which have been properly and fully completed and which contain all information required in the grant application or requested by HARC or the Main Street Advisory Board. (e) All construction bids submitted by Applicant must be current and must be dated no earlier than ninety (90) days prior to the application request. Bids shall be submitted on the contractor’s or project architect’s letterhead and shall contain the contractors name, address, telephone number and shall itemize the bid in a manner that allows the Main Street Advisory Board to determine the bid components and authenticity of the bid. Page 9 of 59 L:\Division\ms\ed\MAIN STREET\Design & Infrastructure\Facade & Sign Grant Program\Grant Applications\Application Form\2017 Facade Sign Reimbursement Grant Application.doc 3 (f) An Applicant who submits an application that was denied a grant by the Main Street Advisory Board shall not be eligible to re-submit a grant application for six (6) months from the date the prior application was declined by the Main Street Advisory Board. (g) Applicants receiving approval by the Main Street Advisory Board shall commence construction described within the application within ninety (90) days from the date the grant is awarded by the Main Street Advisory Board. All Applicants must complete the construction described in the Application within one (1) year from the date the grant is approved by the Main Street Advisory Board. If the Applicant is unable to commence construction within ninety (90) days from the date the grant is approved or complete construction within one (1) year from the date the grant is approved, the Applicant may submit a written request and verbal presentation for an extension for the commencement date or completion date provided the extension request is made prior to the ninety (90) day or one (1) year time limit. The Main Street Advisory Board shall not be obligated to allow extensions but may do so for good cause determined solely by the Main Street Advisory Board. The extensions, if granted, shall be for the term and for the conditions determined exclusively by the Main Street Advisory Board. An extension denial can not be appealed and shall be final with the Main Street Advisory Board. (h) As a condition of this grant application and in consideration of the opportunity to apply for a grant, the Applicant consents and shall allow the Main Street Advisory Board to request City inspections to determine the grant, if awarded, shall not be used for construction to any building that is not in compliance with the City Municipal Codes and Ordinances which are applicable to the construction contemplated in the application. (i) The Applicant, by submission of this application, represents the construction described within the application shall be used in a building which is in compliance with all codes and ordinances. (j) The Main Street Advisory Board shall have sole discretion in awarding grants, except in cases appealed to and reviewed by the Georgetown City Council. The Main Street Advisory Board shall award grants considering the grant amount requested, grant funds available, the grant program, condition of the building in which the grant funds will be used, effectiveness of the construction, other grant requests, the type and nature of the construction, and the proposed construction results considering the grant program. (k) No Applicant has a proprietary right to receive grant funds. The Main Street Advisory Board shall consider any application within its discretionary authority to determine what grant amount would be in the best interest of the Grant program. The review criteria may include, but shall not be limited to, compatible architectural design, streetscape objectives, overall redevelopment of the Downtown Overlay District, extended hours, first-floor usage, occupy a vacant or underutilized structure, subject to sales tax, capital expenditures, location and historical property. (l) The Applicant shall be required to furnish photographs of the building’s exterior facade, roof and foundation if relevant part of the application request, and also after the construction is completed, as a condition of final grant reimbursement. Page 10 of 59 L:\Division\ms\ed\MAIN STREET\Design & Infrastructure\Facade & Sign Grant Program\Grant Applications\Application Form\2017 Facade Sign Reimbursement Grant Application.doc 4 (m) The Applicant is required to obtain all applicable City permits and City approvals required for the construction if a grant is awarded. (n) No Applicant, nor Applicant agent, representative or tenant shall be entitled to receive a façade grant approval on the same property address if requested within three (3) years from the date a previous grant was awarded by the Main Street Advisory Board. (o) An Applicant should attend and present their grant project at Main Street Advisory Board meetings which consider the application or when requested to do so by the Main Street Advisory Board. Failure to attend a Main Street Advisory Board meeting when required may be cause for rejection of the application. 5. Reimbursement: When the entire grant project has been satisfactorily completed and reviewed, the applicant shall present the Georgetown Main Street Program office with copies of all paid invoices, including copies of credit card receipts and/or cancelled checks, as well as an digital photos of the building’s exterior, interior, roof or foundation where work has been performed for a single payment reimbursement of the approved funding. In addition, the Applicant must complete a City of Georgetown Vendor Form to receive payment from the City. 6. Appeal Process: Any application rejected by the Main Street Advisory Board shall be entitled to review by the Georgetown City Council. The Applicant shall submit a written request for review to the Assistant City Manager no later than ten (10) days from the date the application is denied by the Main Street Advisory Board. The request for review by the Georgetown City Council shall state reasons why the Applicant believes the application was improperly refused by the Main Street Advisory Board and the reasons why the Applicant believes the application should be approved. The written review request shall be furnished by the Assistant City Manager to the Chair of the Main Street Advisory Board. The Chair of the Main Street Advisory Board shall, within ten (10) days of receipt of the Applicant’s written request from the Assistant City Manager, furnish to the Assistant City Manager the Main Street Advisory Board reasons for refusing the application and shall state reasons why the application should not be approved by the Georgetown City Council. Review by the Georgetown City Council will be scheduled within the time restraints and business issues of the Georgetown City Council, but in no event later than ninety (90) days from the date the written request for review is received by the Assistant City Manager from the Applicant. The City Council shall review the application and consider the action taken by the Main Street Advisory Board regarding the application. The Georgetown City Council shall not be required to reverse the Main Street Advisory Board unless the Georgetown City Council determines the Main Street Advisory Board did not act in substantial compliance with the application request and applicable policies relating to the Georgetown Façade & Sign Grant Program. The Georgetown City Council determination shall be deemed final action regarding the application. Page 11 of 59 L:\Division\ms\ed\MAIN STREET\Design & Infrastructure\Facade & Sign Grant Program\Grant Applications\Application Form\2017 Facade Sign Reimbursement Grant Application.doc 5 INCLUSIONS AND EXCLUSIONS TO FAÇADE & SIGN REIMBURSEMENT GRANT PROGRAM REHABILITATION TIPS:  Roof, foundation and structural items should be given priority over cosmetic improvements.  Carefully examine old buildings for termites, wood rot and general deterioration.  When repairing a building, do not cut expenses on the roof or the foundation.  Be aware of areas on the roof and at connecting walls where water does not readily drain. Flashing should be installed at intersections to prevent leakage.  Carefully locate air conditioning units to avoid water condensations on the sides of buildings. Condensing units should be supported from the masonry walls and not placed directly on the roof.  The top brick cornices that project above the roof deteriorate rapidly unless they are capped with metal, terra cotta, stone or concrete.  When mortar is missing or in poor repair, moisture will enter the walls and eventually may cause structural damage. Deteriorated mortar should be removed to a depth of at least three-fourths of an inch and replaced with new mortar that matches the old in color, texture, material composition and striking of the joint.  Do not sandblast or use harsh chemicals to clean exterior facades. Gentle cleaning with water can remove dirt and paint without damaging the surface of the building.  Do not paint too often; many times a building only needs mild washing.  If the building has stone or brick that has never been painted, do not create a maintenance problem by painting it.  Existing architectural details, including old wood doors, windows, ceilings, and trim work add to the character of a building and its resale value. Repair these features rather than remove them.  Wood windows are designed to be repaired. Frames, sash cords, and other components can be repaired. If the windows are missing, custom-made windows can be ordered for replacement in old buildings.  Pressed metal ceiling panels are still being manufactured today with some of the same patterns installed originally. Deteriorated panels, therefore, can be replaced exactly.  Do not use aluminum siding, stucco or other materials that cover the original facade. It can hide water penetration into the walls and accelerate deterioration.  Before rehabilitating a building façade, take a careful look at the structural aspects of the building. Develop a design that is compatible with neighboring buildings and appropriate for the structures historical development  Retain a sense of continuity by carrying exterior building design inside the structure. Page 12 of 59 L:\Division\ms\ed\MAIN STREET\Design & Infrastructure\Facade & Sign Grant Program\Grant Applications\Application Form\2017 Facade Sign Reimbursement Grant Application.doc 6 FAÇADE REIMBURSEMENT GRANT REVIEW PROCESS Total project scores can range from 0 to 20 points Recommendations will be based on: 0-9 points = No funding recommendation 10-19 points = Grant recommendation up to $10,000 20-30 points = Grant recommendation up to $20,000 Grant applications will be scored based on: Extended Hours 0-2 points First Floor Usage 0-5 points Occupy a Vacant/Underutilized Structure 1-6 points Sales Subject to Sales Tax 1-4 points Capital Expenditures 1-4 points Historic Preservation 1-4 points Enhance Historic Significance 0-2 points Location – On or Off the Square 0-3 points Page 13 of 59 L:\Division\ms\ed\MAIN STREET\Design & Infrastructure\Facade & Sign Grant Program\Grant Applications\Application Form\2017 Facade Sign Reimbursement Grant Application.doc 7 SECRETARY OF INTERIOR’S STANDARDS FOR REHABILITATION All Façade & Sign Reimbursement Grant applications will be reviewed by the HARC for design appropriateness and approved by the Main Street Advisory Board. The HARC and Main Street Advisory Board will maintain an awareness of the Standards of Rehabilitation as follows: 1. A property shall be used for its historic purpose or be placed in a new use that requires minimal change to the defining characteristics of the building and its site and environment. 2. The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. 3. Each property shall be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or architectural elements from other buildings, shall not be undertaken. 4. Most properties change over time; those changes that have acquired historic significance in their own right shall be retained and preserved. 5. Distinctive features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a property shall be preserved. 6. Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features shall be substantiated by documentary, physical, or pictorial evidence. 7. Chemical or physical treatments, such as sandblasting, that cause damage to historic materials shall not be used. The surface cleaning of structures, if appropriate, shall be undertaken using the gentlest means possible. 8. Significant archeological resources affected by a project shall be protected and preserved. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures shall be undertaken. 9. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. Page 14 of 59 L:\Division\ms\ed\MAIN STREET\Design & Infrastructure\Facade & Sign Grant Program\Grant Applications\Application Form\2017 Facade Sign Reimbursement Grant Application.doc 8 10. New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. Additional information regarding the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation is available from the National Park Service, the Texas Historical Commission and the City of Georgetown Planning office. Page 15 of 59 L:\Division\ms\ed\MAIN STREET\Design & Infrastructure\Facade & Sign Grant Program\Grant Applications\Application Form\2017 Facade Sign Reimbursement Grant Application.doc 9 FAÇADE & SIGN REIMBURSEMENT GRANT PROGRAM PROCESS CHECKLIST Use this form as a cover sheet and checklist to follow all steps needed to complete the Façade & Sign Reimbursement Grant Program application to receive approval. Please return completed with necessary attachments and signatures to the Georgetown Downtown Development office, 809 MLK Jr., no later than the THURSDAY prior to the first Friday of each month. If you have any grant application questions, please contact the Downtown Development Manager at 512/930-2027. If you have any building or sign permit/historic preservation or design questions, please contact the Historic District Planner at 512/930-3581.  Meet with Georgetown Downtown Development Manager (512/930-2027) to determine eligibility and to walk through Façade & Sign Reimbursement Grant and instructions, and to possibly set up appointment for free assistance from the Texas Main Street Center’s Design Assistance Program.  Meet with the City’s Historic District Planner (512/930-3581) if any design work may involve receiving a building or sign permit or dealing with historic preservation and inspection issues.  Attend and present grant project to HARC for their design approval. Receive design approval of proposed work listed on grant application. Get approval signature of the Historic District Planner on last page of application form.  Complete Façade & Sign Reimbursement Grant application form and sign agreement form. (Also include required attachments: color samples of all paint, signage, and fabric awnings, digital photographs of building’s exterior, interior, roof or foundation if applicable to grant project)  Return completed grant application and agreement form with required attachments no later than the Thursday prior to the first Friday of the month to the Georgetown Downtown Development Office at 809 MLK Jr. to be added to the next Main Street Advisory Board meeting agenda.  Attend and present Façade & Sign Reimbursement Grant application project at the Main Street Advisory Board meeting for their approval.  Façade & Sign Reimbursement Grant project construction may commence immediately after board approval. Grant work on the building must commence within 90 days of approval from Georgetown Main Street Advisory Board meeting and be completed within one year.  Upon completion of Façade & Sign Reimbursement Grant project, furnish digital photographs of the building’s exterior, interior, roof and foundation if applicable to the grant; copies of all paid invoices, including copies of credit card receipts and/or cancelled checks, to receive a single payment reimbursement of the approved funding. In addition, the applicant must complete a City of Georgetown Vendor Form to receive payment from the City. DEADLINE: Thursday prior to the 1st Friday of each month Date Received: ______________ Page 16 of 59 L:\Division\ms\ed\MAIN STREET\Design & Infrastructure\Facade & Sign Grant Program\Grant Applications\Application Form\2017 Facade Sign Reimbursement Grant Application.doc 10 FAÇADE & SIGN REIMBURSEMENT GRANT PROGRAM APPLICATION Please return completed with necessary attachments and signatures to Georgetown Downtown Development office, 809 MLK Jr., no later than the THURSDAY prior to the first Friday of each month. If you have any grant application questions, please contact the Downtown Development Manager at 512/930-2027. If you have any building or sign permit/historic preservation or design questions, please contact the Historic District Planner at 512/930-3581.  Applicant Name_______________________________________________________ Date______________________________  Business Name__________________________________________________________________________________________  Mailing Address ______________  Contact Phone___________________________________ Email Address__________________________________________  Building Owner (if different from applicant)___________________________________________________________________  Historical/Current Building Name _________________________________________________________________________  Physical Building Address________________________________________________________________________________  Type of Work: (check all that apply) Sign Paint Masonry cleaning/paint removal Awning/Canopy Fire Sprinklers or Suppression Systems Uncovering/replacing windows Roof work Foundation work Removal of barriers to public accessibility Other: _________________________________________________________________________________________________  Details of Planned Improvements for Façade & Sign Reimbursement Grant: (attach additional information if necessary)  How will this project benefit downtown? (Check all that apply) Extended business hours □ First floor usage □ Occupying vacant/underutilized structure □ Subject to sales tax □ Enhance historic significance □ Location is on the square □ Location is off the square □  List Contractor/Project Architect Proposals and Total Amounts (attach original proposals): 1. 2. 3.  TOTAL COST OF PROPOSED GRANT PROJECT (CAPITAL EXPENDITURES): _____  AMOUNT OF FAÇADE AND/OR SIGN GRANT REQUESTED (MAY NOT EXCEED 50% OF TOTAL GRANT COSTS: $500 SIGN MAX, $20,000 FACADE MAX): Include all required color samples of paint fabric canopy, sign design, etc., as well as digital photographs of building’s exterior, roof and foundation if applicable to grant. Applicant’s Signature Date Advisory Board Review Approved Rejected Date Page 17 of 59 L:\Division\ms\ed\MAIN STREET\Design & Infrastructure\Facade & Sign Grant Program\Grant Applications\Application Form\2017 Facade Sign Reimbursement Grant Application.doc 11 FAÇADE & SIGN REIMBURSEMENT GRANT AGREEMENT FORM Please return completed with necessary attachments and signature to Georgetown Downtown Development office, 809 MLK Jr. no later than the Thursday prior to the first Friday of each month. If you have any grant application questions, please contact the Downtown Development Manager at 512/930-2027. If you have any historic preservation/design questions, please contact the Historic District Planner at 512/930-3581. I have met with the Georgetown Downtown Development Manager, and I fully understand the Façade & Sign Reimbursement Grant Procedures and Details established by the Georgetown Main Street Advisory Board. I intend to use this grant program for the aforementioned renovation projects to forward the efforts of the downtown revitalization and historic preservation program known as the Georgetown Main Street Program. I have not received, nor will I receive insurance monies for this revitalization project. I have read the Façade & Sign Reimbursement Grant Application Procedures including the Façade & Sign Reimbursement Grant Details. I understand that if I am awarded a Façade & Sign Reimbursement Grant by the Georgetown Main Street Advisory Board, any deviation from the approved project may result in the partial or total withdrawal of the Façade & Sign Reimbursement Grant. If the façade or sign is altered for any reason within one (1) year from construction, I may be required to reimburse the City of Georgetown immediately for the full amount of the Façade & Sign Reimbursement Grant. ____________ Business/Organization Name Applicant’s Signature Printed Name Date Building Owner’s Signature (if different from applicant) Printed Name Date This section to be completed by City Staff: Georgetown HARC’s Design Approval (obtain signature of Historic District Planner or City Planning staff) Date Georgetown Main Street Advisory Board’s Approval Date Page 18 of 59 UDC Development Manual Georgetown, Texas Master Application Revised: October 2016 www.georgetown.org Page 1 of 2  Master Application Applications are to be submitted to the Planning Department, located at 406 W. 8th St. Georgetown, TX 78626 Monday through Friday, between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Application Type (Please neatly print the application type as termed on the Application Submittal Authorization Form) 1) __________________________________________________________________________________________ Project Information Project Name: _______________________________________________________________________________ Property Address: ___________________________________________________________________________ (Street Address) (Zip Code) Legal Description: ______________________________________ City Limits or ETJ? __________________ Acreage: Total Lots (incl. open space, drainage, etc.): ___________________ (Indicate if limits of construction) City Limits? __________ Current Zoning: __ Proposed Zoning: ____________________ (yes or no) (If applicable) (If applicable) For Plat, Construction Plan, Site Development Plan, and Stormwater Permit Applications only: Is the subject property located over the Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone? ‰ No ‰ Yes (select one below) ‰ A signed and notarized Water Quality Acknowledgement Form is included and made part of this application (including a Geological Assessment if applicable). ‰ A signed and notarized Water Quality Acknowledgement Form and Geologic Assessment (if applicable) were submitted with City Application No. ___________________________and this application is consistent with the project identified on said application and submitted form. Items Required for Submittal In addition to this Master Application Form and required submittal fees, the following forms must be completed and submitted in order to file an application. ¾ Application Submittal Authorization Form This form is provided by staff after a pre-application meeting and details the application type(s) ready for submittal. ¾ Application Checklist (if required) An Application Checklist may be required for specific types of applications. The checklist lays out the essential technical information and documents required for each application type. The checklist is also a guide to the digital submission requirements that are needed for the MyPermitNow tracking system that the City employs. All required items must be included with the submittal. Incomplete applications cannot be accepted. Applications will be reviewed for completeness within five (5) working days of submittal. If an application is determined to be Page 19 of 59 UDC Development Manual Georgetown, Texas Master Application Revised: October 2016 www.georgetown.org Page 2 of 2  incomplete, the applicant will be notified and given a specific period of time to submit the missing material. If the material is not resubmitted within the specified period, the application shall be rejected in its entirety and a new application and fee will be required. Property Owner Information Property Owner Name(s): _______________________________________________________________________ Phone: ____________________________________ Email: ________________________________________ Address: ________________________________________________________________________________ City: State: Zip Code: By my signature, I hereby affirm that: ¾ I am the property owner of record and consent to this application. I further affirm that I am fully aware of the City’s application, fee, and procedural requirements. ¾ I have the ability to assign my rights as the official Applicant to an agent of my choosing or I may choose to serve as the Applicant for this project. As noted below, I have declared my intent to serve as Applicant or designate this responsibility to someone else. Property Owner Signature: __________________________ Printed Name: _____________________________ Applicant Information The Applicant will be the primary point of contact throughout the process. All correspondence and communication will be conducted with the Applicant, and the Applicant will be the authorized representative at any board, commission, or City Council meetings unless the Applicant, in writing, designates a representative prior to the scheduled meeting. ‰ Owner, as indicated on this application, will act as applicant ‰ Owner designates the following person/firm to act as the applicant on their behalf: Applicant Name: ________________________________________________________________________ Phone: ______________________________ Email: ________________________________________ Address: __________________________________________________________________________ City: State: Zip Code: Certification of Materials By my signature, I hereby affirm that the information in this application submittal is complete and accurate. I further affirm that I am fully aware of the City’s application, fee, and procedural requirements. Printed Name: ______________________________________ Date: Applicant Signature:   Page 20 of 59 Page 21 of 59 UDC Development Manual Georgetown, Texas CoA Checklist Revised: July 2015 www.georgetown.org Page 1 of 11 Certificate of Appropriateness (CoA) Checklist This Checklist is intended to assist you in preparing a complete application for submittal. Occasionally, additional items may be required to complete the review. Incomplete applications will not be accepted. Please indicate the level of Review Authority for the application being submitted (check one; please see Pages 2-6 to determine your Review Authority):  HARC Review  HPO Review  Renewal of an expired CoA (Original Project #: ) Digital Submission Requirements The City of Georgetown utilizes a digital review system called MyPermitNow, which requires certain digital submittal standards. For more detailed information and troubleshooting, please review the separate MyPermitNow User Guide available at https://planning.georgetown.org/mypermitnow/. • All applications must be submitted on a CD/DVD or Flash Drive that will not be returned. Discs or drives must be clearly labeled with the Project Name. • All items must be submitted in flat PDF format (no layers) with no digital signatures or passwords. The maximum file size is 50 MB with a 300 dpi resolution preferred. JPEG is not an acceptable format. Submittal Documents The following is grouped into the electronic documents that will be required for submittal. The bulleted list below each document heading shows the individual items that are to be combined to form that PDF document in the order that they are to be combined. The wording in italics is the name that particular PDF document must be given to expedite the intake of your application.  PDF Document 1: Application Information • Master Application Form • Submittal Authorization Form (provided at the Pre-application meeting) • Page 1 of this CoA Checklist  PDF Document 2: Letter of Intent and Supporting Materials • A Letter of Intent describing the proposed Project(s), and how it meets the Design Guidelines and UDC. For applications with multiple Projects (signage, paint, addition, etc.) include each item being sought as a part of the application using the applicable Additional Items Required for Submittal as specified below. • Plans, drawings, specifications and other supporting materials of the proposed Project(s) as identified in the Additional Items Required for Submittal below. In addition to the digital items listed above, the following paper copies must be included in the submittal packet:  Material(s) Samples • 1 copy of each material sample (i.e. paint chip samples, wall panel samples, etc.), as specified in the Additional Items Required for Submittal below. Additional copies of all m aterial samples may be required. Please Note: • One application is required for each type of review (HARC or HPO). However, one application may include one or more Projects as identified in UDC Table 3.13.010, and shall be subject to one fee for the review of that application. • All dimensional drawings shall be to scale and include dimensions (height, area, etc.), label, scale, and north arrow. • All color renderings and samples shall be an accurate representation of the proposed or existing color. • All renderings provided shall be an accurate representation of the property and any proposed changes. • If accurate materials are not provided or clearly explained, a delay may occur in processing your application. Page 22 of 59 t To HARC: It has long been a dream of the Kasper family to own a building in downtown Georgetown, and recently that dream was realized with the purchase of the historic David Love building. In order to be the best stewards possible of the building, we immediately began cleaning and renovating the available interior spaces, which are the two apartments located on the upper floor. Now we are seeking your support to renovate the façade and restore the beauty of the ornate detailing in the original construction. The David Love Building was built in 1883 and then renovated in 1983 by Eugenia and David Harrell. The Harrells took a number of steps to achieve both national and historic designations. In the process, they removed the old awning, added clerestory, replaced all windows on the front and back façades, and re-worked and re-painted the façade. With the passage of time and the hot Texas sun, many of these items have been worn and need replacing. We began by first consulting with Sarah Blankenship at the Main Street Program, Shelly Hargrove and Matt Synatschk. We have since held meetings with both Kim Mcauliffe and Sofia Nelson to ensure we were fulfilling the City’s intent. The items we are focusing on restoring, pursuant to the Design Guidelines are as follows: Paint – Sarah Blankenship helped to provide us with a sample of appropriate color schemes for this Victorian building. We preferred the light grey color scheme with dark accents. To address Sections 11.1-11.3, the family examined historic photos from both the Harrell’s collection, the city’s archives, the Williamson County Museum and Donna Scarbrough Josey’s book “Then and Now: Georgetown,” indicated this seemed to be consistent with the early life of the building. Granted the photos are in black and white, but the intent seems consistent. This is a similar scheme to that on the Georgetown Art Center, which fits in well with the neighboring buildings. Pursuant to Section 11.6, we would like to highlight some of the beautiful detail in the second story tin features. We have attached indicative color samples. Facade – A.Windows. The sizing and location of the windows define this building as referenced in Sections 6.1-6.3. Per the architect’s renderings from 1983, all the windows on the building were replaced with ¼ inch tempered glass during the remodel. We would like to keep the exact look of the displays, transoms and upper story windows, but put in a double paned product to help with efficiencies. Throughout the day, the second floor heats substantially, even with interior shutters. Further, there is evidence of past leaks on the second story. Given the cost of the interior renovation and of the façade, we want to preserve that as best as possible. We are looking at Anderson or Pella products currently- double sashed, double-paned and custom sized to fit the existing locations. The first floor windows will also need a custom cut, but we request they be double paned. This will comply with Sections 6.12, 6.13 and 6.16 of the Design Guidelines. The David Love Building Page 23 of 59 B.Awning– Working again with Sarah, we were given some historically appropriate options for awnings to fulfill Chapter 10 of the Design Guidelines. Again, looking at the historic photos of the building, we prefer a standing seam, black metal awning for the clean line and classic look, as well as its durability. In addition to restoring a historical feature, the awning has practical attributes, providing welcome shade for pedestrians, shielding the merchandise on the ground floor from direct sun, and providing shelter when those crazy Texas storms blow in. Signage - The original building had a parapet containing the words “Love Building,” and possibly the date of construction. A later iteration has “The David Love Store” painted between first and second floors. Section 9.7 of the Design Guidelines actually shows a picture of the newer location. We would prefer to use wood or metal letters in a serif font similar to the historical font, but with placement of the signage to the upper story. The sign will read “The Love Building 1883”. This will fit within the composition of the plain panel area below the frieze, and is keeping with those historically seen in the area and in the photo provided. We are happy to answer any questions and look forward to working with you. Sincerely, Page 24 of 59 Proposed Color Scheme, Awning and Signage for the David Love Building Page 25 of 59 Historical Views of Austin Aveue and the David Love Building Page 26 of 59 Page 27 of 59 Current and Historical Views of the Facade of the David Love Building Page 28 of 59 Scanned by CamScanner Page 29 of 59 April 13, 2017 Texas Main Street Center Design Report Re: 706 Austin Avenue City: Georgetown, Texas By: Sarah Blankenship, Project Design er Not for regulatory approval, permitting, or construction The purpose of this report is to provide ideas and schematic designs for projects. Main Street Staff works with the plans of business and property owners to provide designs that meet their objectives while still respecting the historic building. For official tax credit review, a separate process must be followed and may involve modified design plans to meet the criteria: http://www.thc.texas.gov/preserve/projects-and-programs/preservation-tax- incentives/texas-historic-preservation-tax-credit Prior to making any improvements to the building façade(s), the building owner should perform a thorough review of the major structural components including the roof, walls, and foundation. All mechanical and electrical systems should be well maintained in conformity with applicable codes and ordinances. Building uses and interior arrangements of program spaces should also be in conformity with applicable codes and ordinances. DESIGN REQUEST A design request was submitted for the building at 706 Austin Avenue. The new building owners would like to see different color schemes for the front façade. The color scheme of the Georgetown Art Center, seen below right, was referenced as preferred colors. A canopy or awning was also discussed as a possibility. Several renderings are provided on the following pages illustrating a variety of color schemes and awning possibilities. These can be modified upon request. Existing Conditions Color Scheme R eference Page 30 of 59 Page 2 of 10 DESIGN RENDERINGS Below are ten color schemes for 706 Austin Avenue. #4: Medium brown base color, white and blue/purple blue accents #3: White base color, darker blue accents #2: Light blue base color, brown and darker blue accents #1: Light gray base color, red and black accents Page 31 of 59 Page 3 of 10 #8: Gray base color, white, dark gray and small areas of blue accents #7: Gray base color, white and dark gray accents #6: Light gray accent base color, dark gray and light yellow accents #5: Medium brown base color, gray and white accents Page 32 of 59 Page 4 of 10 In general, the goal is to have a color scheme that is compatible with the rest of the Main Street district. A color scheme should not be too overpowering. Thus, more muted colors are typically selected for the majority of the building and vibrant colors limited to smaller accent areas. The façade of 706 Main Street is pressed metal. Historically, pressed metal was a more cost-efficient way to create a storefront with intricate designs than carved stone. Georgetown has several pressed metal facades, many of which were produced by a company called Mesker. There have been many approaches to color over the years on pressed metal façades. One approach was to paint the pressed metal the color of local stone to make the storefront appear like it was carved stone. The “painted lady” approach used multiple colors to accent as many details as possible. Ultimately, the decision comes down to personal preference. There is an interesting article titled “Don’t Faint, it’s just Paint” which looks at different colors on Mesker Facades. It can be found here: http://meskerbrothers.wordpress.com/2011/10/12/dont-faint-its-just-paint/. Below are some different color examples from that article. #9: Light yellow base color, white and blue-gray accents #9: Light blue base color, white and dark gray accents Page 33 of 59 Page 5 of 10 WOOD STOREFRONT & WOOD WINDOWS The storefront is showing signs of wood deterioration. It is possible that the storefront has been replaced at some point, possibly during the 1983 renovation, but the proportions are appropriate and relate to the historic photos. Therefore, it should be retained as is. The second- floor windows are historic and must be retained. Tinted glass is not recommended. For shade, the current shutters are an appropriate solution. For noise reduction, interior storm windows can be a consideration that does not change the exterior historic appearance of the building. For the wood windows, repair rotted or missing pieces of the frame by splicing in new pieces only in that location rather than replacing the entire window. Use consolidants on wood that is damaged or shows signs of rot to prolong the lifespan. A full explanation of how to properly maintain or repair historic wood windows can be found on the National Park Service website here: http://www.nps.gov/tps/how-to-preserve/briefs/9-wooden-windows.htm. The General Services Administration (GSA) also provides technical sheets on historic preservation that list straightforward steps to follow and list companies/suppliers. • Restoring Wood Window Sash and Frames - http://www.gsa.gov/portal/content/113490 • Primers and Paints for Wood - http://www.gsa.gov/portal/content/113070 • Epoxy Repair for Deterioration and Decay in Wooden Members – http://www.gsa.gov/portal/content/112030 • Surface Preparation for Painting Wood – http://www.gsa.gov/portal/content/113074 In 1983, the David Love Store was restored by owners Eugenia and Donald Harrell. Interior renovation on the ground floor provided space for several businesses (stores within a store) that sell such items as antiques, folk art, collectibles, and special gifts. The second-floor area has been divided into office space and apartments. Source: http://www.williamson-county-historical-commission.org/GEORGETOWN_TEXAS/David_Love_Store_the_Williamson_County_Texas.html 1984 Historic Photo 2004 I nterior Storm Windows E xisting Storefront Page 34 of 59 Page 6 of 10 AWNINGS/CANOPIES The addition of an awning or canopy to the front façade was discussed to provide shade and protection for the storefront. According to Georgetown’s design guidelines, “An awning or canopy should be similar to those seen historically”. The historic photo on the previous page shows an angled canopy above the transoms with pole supports. The roofing material was most likely metal. The streetscape has changed from pole-supported canopies to tie-rod supported canopies. Some historians attribute this change to the advent of the automobile and cars hitting the poles. A tie-rod supported canopy could be considered for the building and is seen in the 1984 photograph above. Supporting the awning or canopy with brackets from underneath is another consideration. Below are four options that have been explored for 706 Austin Ave. They are illustrated on color scheme 8 only, but can be applied to any color scheme upon request. 8D: Rolled metal canopy located above the transom windows supported with brackets underneath 8C: Fabric awning located above the transom windows supported by brackets underneath 8B: Canopy in between the transom window supported by tie-rods above 8A: Metal canopy above the transom windows supported by brackets underneath Page 35 of 59 Page 7 of 10 SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR’S STANDARDS When rehabilitating a historic building, the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards should be considered. The Standards for Rehabilitation are a series of concepts about maintaining, repairing, and replacing historic materials, as well as designing new additions or making alterations. They provide a framework and guidance for decision-making about work or changes to a historic property. The Standards can be found here - http://www.nps.gov/tps/standards/rehabilitation.htm. All changes, additions, and modifications to the building shall comply with the Standards and local design guidelines. BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS The purpose of all codes is to provide minimum requirements for new and renovated buildings in order to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the public. Fire prevention and life safety are their primary focus. Building code requirements vary depending on the occupancy or function of the building and the type of construction. In Texas, there is not a state building code, though state regulations do govern certain aspect of new construction or rehabilitation. Local governments officially adopt a specific building code, such as the International Building Code. A local code may contain amendments or changes particular to the local environment or conditions. The authorities may also adopt different codes for mechanical or electrical work, for example. Contact your local building authority to learn what codes govern your project. For other resources pertaining to rules and regulations that may apply to historic buildings, including Texas Accessibility Standards, Lead Paint and Asbestos Abatement, and Energy Conservation, please refer to the following links • THC Building Code Resources - http://www.thc.texas.gov/preserve/buildings-and-property/building-codes • Lead Paint Rules and Regulations - http://www.dshs.texas.gov/elp/rules.shtm • Asbestos Rules and Regulations - http://www.dshs.texas.gov/asbestos/rules.shtm • Texas Accessibility Standards (TAS) - http://www.tdlr.state.tx.us/ab/abtas.htm • The Federal American’s with Disability Act(ADA) - http://www.ada.gov/ • ADA Primer for Small Business - http://www.ada.gov/regs2010/smallbusiness/smallbusprimer2010.htm There is the possibility of an IRS tax credit or deduction for making ADA improvements. Please see http://www.ada.gov/taxcred.htm for more information. 1. A property shall be used for its historic purpose or be placed in a new use that requires minimal change to the defining characteristics of the building and its site and environment. 2. The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. 3. Each property shall be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or architectural elements from other buildings, shall not be undertaken. 4. Most properties change over time; those changes that have acquired historic significance in their own right shall be retained and preserved. 5. Distinctive features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a historic property shall be preserved. 6. Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features shall be substantiated by documentary, physical, or pictorial evidence. 7. Chemical or physical treatments, such as sandblasting, that cause damage to historic materials shall not be used. The surface cleaning of structures, if appropriate, shall be undertaken using the gentlest means possible. 8. Significant archeological resources affected by a project shall be protected and preserved. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures shall be undertaken. 9. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. 10. New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. Page 36 of 59 Page 8 of 10 SIGNAGE The signage should be a full package of several signs that complement each other and attract people from different vantage points. The sign above the windows should be large enough to be seen across the street and from passing cars. Tag lines or additional information about the business can be added to the façade using window signage. Panel Sign Blade Sign Three Dimensional Letters Painted Sign Pedestrian Sign Window Sign FABRICATION Careful consideration should be given as to how the signage is fabricated. The Design Staff recommends using a local fabricator or sign company who will work with the property owner to achieve the chosen aesthetic of the sign. Panel signs can be printed or hand painted on a flat surface, but should a have a fine level of detail to make the sign look complete. The borders, symbols, and several layers of color in the images below add to the overall aesthetic and make the signs look unified. Panel signs can also be three –dimensional. For example, in the green Powell’s sign on the following page, each element is a separate layer of material, which adds shadow and depth. Hand – Painted Printed 3-D Page 37 of 59 Page 9 of 10 MATERIALS Signage can be made from wood, high density urethane foam, or metal. Plastic should be avoided as it is not compatible with the design of historic architecture. Hand-P ainted Wood Layered Metal Sandblasting the background of a foam or wood can create depth and visual interest like in the images below. EXTERIOR LIGHTING Exterior lighting on a building and in a historic downtown provides comfortable and walkable conditions at night. Lighting sources should be shielded from direct glare and should conform to the International Dark Sky Association guidelines - http://darksky.org/lighting/lighting-basics/ To minimize the harmful effects of light pollution, lighting should (1) only be on when needed, (2) only light the area that needs it, (3) be no brighter than necessary, (4) minimize blue light emissions and (5) be fully shielded (pointing downward). Lighting should also be coordinated with the installation of signage to make the business visible at night. Panel or perpendicular signs can be illuminated from any angle using spotlights. Spotlights can be mounted on the top surface of the canopy or attached to the metal arm of the perpendicular sign. The spotlights depicted are small and have a simple profile, which decreases their visual impact on the façade. Three dimensional letters can be back lit, lit internally or illuminated with spotlights as well. Other methods can also be used to highlight signage. Halcyon Example Perpendicular Signs Page 38 of 59 Page 10 of 10 Coffee Bar uses hidden trough lights to light the three-dimensional letters from the bottom in combination with spotlights on the façade. FUNDING There are many options for funding preservation projects. As part of a designated Main Street community, the property owner has as a resource the local Main Street manager who can help you research and identify sources of additional funding. Localized financial tools can include façade grants or other direct assistance programs that come through sources such as local economic development organizations. The THC and TMSP has compiled a document that identifies many of these avenues for funding and financing, it can be found on our website: http://www.thc.texas.gov/public/upload/publications/Funding%20Methods%20for%20Main%20Street%20com munities%206.3.15%20update.pdf. There are funding sources at the local, state and federal levels and they are outlined in the document. The list provides only brief summaries of potential funding sources, and information including eligibility requirements and application deadlines that are subject to change without notice. If the scope of work exceeds available sources of funding, the project should be phased accordingly, but these options for funding can still be utilized. Please contact possible grantors directly for more information on their programs. State & Federal Preservation Tax Credit Income – producing properties listed on the National Register (individual or district) or designated as a Registered Texas Historic Landmark or State Antiquities Landmark may be eligible for one or both of the tax credits programs offered through the state. The work undertaken as part of the project must meet the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation, found here: http://www.nps.gov/tps/standards/four -treatments/treatment-rehabilitation.htm. For more information on the tax credit programs and application process, please visit: http://www.thc.state.tx.us/preserve/proj ects-and-programs/preservation-tax- incentives or contact Christine Huber at 512.475.0129/Christine.Huber@thc.texas.gov. After the owner has had a chance to review the recommended concept, the Texas Main Street Design Center Staff will work with the owner(s) to help develop their rehabilitation plan for this particular building. It is also requested that TMSDC be notified when clarification of design elements might prove helpful or when an alternate scheme is contemplated. Please contact Sarah Blankenship (512) 463-9129/ sarahb@thc.texas.gov , or Marie Oehlerking-Read (512) 463-3345 / marieo@thc.texas.gov . Page 39 of 59 City of Georgetown, Texas Main Street Advisory Board February 2, 2018 SUBJECT: Disc ussion and p o s s ib le ac tion regard ing Main Street Faç ad e & S ign Grant applic ation – 604 S. Church Street - Kim McAu liffe, Down town Development Manager ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: Fac ad e Grant F und SUBMITTED BY: Kim McAuliffe ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Cover s heet Cover Memo Facade grant application Backup Material Supplemental to Application Backup Material Bids Backup Material EX. A - Images Exhibit Page 40 of 59 - COVERSHEET - MAIN STREET PROGRAM – FAÇADE & SIGN GRANT FUND 8:30 A.M. – FRIDAY, DECEMBER 8, 2017 LINDA MCCALLA INTERIORS – 604 S. CHURCH STREET AGENDA ITEM DESCRIPTION Discussion and possible action on a Main Street Facade Grant Fund application request for the property located at 604 S. Church Street. The planned facade improvements include new paint for the façade to highlight the unique architectural details of the building, roof and exterior trim repairs, handrail repair, and fencing replacement to the section that is viewed within city right of way on Church Street. The Applicant has reviewed bid options and elected to act as general contractor and have selected sub- contractors perform the required work, including construction labor and materials to repair the wood trim on the roof and building, exterior painting, handrail repair, and a new wooden fence. The estimate provided by applicant totals $13,477.00 and applicant seeks a facade grant for the maximum award of 50% or - $6,738.50. AGENDA ITEM DETAILS • Business Name: Linda McCalla Interiors • Applicant: Linda McCalla • Property Owner: Linda McCalla • Property Address: 604 S. Church Street • Historical/Current Building Name: Linda McCalla Interiors • Legal Description: GEORGETOWN CITY OF, BLOCK 39, LOT 5(SE/PT), ACRES .055 • Historic Overlay: Williamson County Courthouse Historic Overlay District • Application History: This is the first review for this application ECONOMIC IMPACT Extended hours of operation: Standard business hours M-F with extended hours as needed. First Floor Use: Yes Occupy a Vacant Structure: No, the space is utilized. Sales Subject to Sales Tax: Yes, business is subject to sales tax. Capital Expenditures: The applicant is investing $13,000+ into the property for business improvements. HISTORIC PRESERVATION Date of construction: Circa 1920-1950 2007 Historic Resources Survey Level of Priority: Medium Priority National Register Designation: None Texas Historical Commission Designation: None Page 41 of 59 LOCATION On the Square vs. Off the Square: The property does not face the Courthouse and is considered to be Off the Square STAFF ANALYSIS Staff has met with applicant and reviewed the application in its entirety. Staff finds that the request is complete and eligible for funding consideration by the Main Street Advisory Board. ATTACHMENTS Facade Application SUBMITTED BY Kim McAuliffe, Downtown Development Manager Page 42 of 59 Page 43 of 59 Page 44 of 59 Page 45 of 59 Page 46 of 59 Page 47 of 59 Page 48 of 59 Page 49 of 59 Page 50 of 59 Page 51 of 59 Page 52 of 59 Page 53 of 59 Page 54 of 59 Page 55 of 59 City of Georgetown, Texas Main Street Advisory Board February 2, 2018 SUBJECT: Fac ad e & Sign Grant Dis cus s io n and Possib le Ac tion ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: NA SUBMITTED BY: Kim McAuliffe Page 56 of 59 City of Georgetown, Texas Main Street Advisory Board February 2, 2018 SUBJECT: Projec t Team & P artner Up d ates ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: NA SUBMITTED BY: Kim McAuliffe Page 57 of 59 City of Georgetown, Texas Main Street Advisory Board February 2, 2018 SUBJECT: Staff Rep o rt ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: NA SUBMITTED BY: Kim McAuliffe Page 58 of 59 City of Georgetown, Texas Main Street Advisory Board February 2, 2018 SUBJECT: Adjournment ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: na SUBMITTED BY: Kim McAuliffe Page 59 of 59