Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda_P&Z_01.16.2018
Notice of Meeting for the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Georgetown January 16, 2018 at 6:00 PM at Council and Courts Building, 101 E 8th Street Georgetown, TX 78626 The City o f G eo rgeto wn is committed to comp lianc e with the Americans with Dis abilities Ac t (ADA). If yo u req uire as s is tanc e in participating at a p ublic meeting d ue to a disability, as d efined und er the ADA, reas onab le as s is tance, ad ap tatio ns , or acc o mmo d ations will b e provid ed up o n req uest. P leas e c o ntact the City Sec retary's Office, at leas t three (3) days prior to the sc hed uled meeting d ate, at (512) 930-3652 o r City Hall at 113 Eas t 8th Street fo r add itional info rmation; TTY us ers ro ute through Relay Texas at 711. Public Wishing to Address the Board On a sub ject that is pos ted on this agend a: Pleas e fill out a speaker regis tration form which c an b e found at the Bo ard meeting. C learly p rint yo ur name, the letter o f the item o n which yo u wis h to s p eak, and present it to the Staff Liais o n, p referab ly p rio r to the s tart of the meeting. You will be called forward to speak when the Board cons id ers that item. On a sub ject not pos ted on the agend a: Pers ons may add an item to a future Bo ard agenda b y filing a written req uest with the S taff Liaison no later than one week prior to the Board meeting. T he req uest mus t inc lude the s p eaker's name and the s p ecific to p ic to b e ad d res s ed with sufficient information to info rm the b o ard and the p ublic . For Board Liais on c o ntact info rmatio n, pleas e lo gon to http://go vernment.georgetown.o rg/category/b o ard s -commissions /. A As of th e d ea d lin e, n o p ersons were sign ed up to sp ea k on items other than those p osted on the a g enda. Consent Agenda The Statutory Cons ent Agenda inc ludes non-c o ntro versial and ro utine items that may be acted up o n with one s ingle vo te. An item may b e pulled from the Cons ent Agenda in o rd er that it b e dis c us sed and acted up o n individ ually as part of the Regular Agenda. B Co nsideration of the Minutes from the Dec emb er 5, 2017 meeting. Karen Fros t, Rec o rd ing S ecretary C Consideration and possible action on a Preliminary Plat fo r the Georgetown Retail Land III Subdivision, loc ated at 4652 Williams Drive, als o kno wn as Cedar Breaks Wes t (P P-2017-003) - Nathan Jo nes-Meyer, Planner D Consideration and possible action on a Preliminary Plat fo r the Oakmont Subdivision, lo cated approximately o ne mile southwest of the inters ectio n o f Booty Crossing and Williams Drive (PP-2017- 006) - Sofia Nels o n, CNU-A, P lanning Direc tor E Consideration and possible action on a Preliminary Final Plat for the Williams Drive Business Park Subdivision, loc ated at 4775 Williams Drive jus t west of the inters ec tio n o f Williams Drive and S hell Ro ad . (PP-2017-010), Nathan Jo nes-Meyer, Planner Legislativ e Regular Agenda Page 1 of 46 F Public Hearing and possible action on a req ues t for a Special Use Permit to allow an indoor self- storage facility within the Loc al Co mmerc ial (C -1) zo ning d is tric t o n the p ro p erty loc ated at 1050 Westingho us e (SUP-2017-009, Indoor Self-Sto rage at Vis ta Pointe o n Wes tinghous e) Nathan Jones - Meyer, Planner G Up d ates: The next meeting o f the Planning & Zo ning Commission will be on Tues day, F eb ruary 6, 2018. Adjournment CERTIFICATE OF POSTING I, Shelley No wling, C ity S ecretary fo r the C ity of Geo rgeto wn, Texas , d o hereby c ertify that this Notice of Meeting was p o s ted at City Hall, 113 E. 8th Street, a p lace read ily acc es s ible to the general p ublic at all times , on the ______ d ay o f __________________, 2018, at __________, and remained so p o s ted fo r at leas t 72 c o ntinuo us ho urs p receding the sc heduled time o f s aid meeting. ____________________________________ S helley No wling, City Sec retary Page 2 of 46 City of Georgetown, Texas Planning and Zoning January 16, 2018 SUBJECT: Cons id eration o f the Minutes fro m the Dec ember 5, 2017 meeting. Karen F ro s t, R ecording Sec retary ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: NA SUBMITTED BY: Karen Fro s t, Rec o rd ing S ecretary ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Minutes _P&Z_12.05.2017 Backup Material Page 3 of 46 Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 1 of 5 December 5, 2017 City of Georgetown, Texas Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes Tuesday, December 5, 2017 at 6:00 p.m. Council and Courts Building, located at 101 E 7th Street Georgetown, TX 78626 Commissioners present: Josh Schroeder, Chair; Tim Bargainer; Ercel Brashear; Alex Fuller; John Marler; Travis Perthuis, Alternate; Kevin Pitts, Vice-Chair and Andy Webb. Absent: Aaron Albright, Alternate Staff Present: Sofia Nelson, Planning Director; Chris Yanez, Andreina Davila-Quintero, Current Planning Manager; and Karen Frost, Recording Secretary. A. Chair Schroeder called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Webb led the pledge of allegiance. Chair Schroeder stated the order of the meeting and that those who speak must turn in a speaker form to the recording secretary before the item that they wish to address begins. Each speaker is permitted to address the Commission once for each item, for a maximum of three (3) minutes, unless otherwise agreed to before the meeting begins. • As of the deadline for this agenda, no persons were signed up to speak on items other than what was posted on the agenda. Consent Agenda The Statutory Consent Agenda includes non-controversial and routine items that may be acted upon with one single vote. An item may be pulled from the Consent Agenda in order that it be discussed and acted upon individually as part of the Regular Agenda. B. Consideration of the Minutes from the November 7, 2017 meeting. Karen Frost, Recording Secretary C. Consideration and possible action on a Preliminary/Final Plat for the Natural Grocers Subdivision, located at 1301 W. University Avenue. (PFP-2016-004) Chris Yanez, Assistant Planning Director. D. Consideration and possible action on a request to vacate the plat of the subdivision known as Lyons Addition, recorded in Cabinet G, Slide 350, of the Official Public Records of Williamson County, Texas. (VAC-2017-002) Chelsea Irby, Planner, and Andreina Dávila-Quintero, Current Planning Manager E. Consideration and possible action for a Preliminary Final Plat for a two-lot subdivision to be known as the Lyons Addition Subdivision (FP-2017-031) - Chelsea Irby, Planner, and Andreina Davila- Quintero, Current Planning Manager F. Consideration and possible action on a Preliminary/Final Plat for the Daniel Subdivision, located at 2101 Airport Road. (PFP-2017-002) Chris Yanez, Assistant Planning Director. Motion by Brashear, second by Bargainer to approve the Consent Agenda with modification for letter F to correct the name of the subdivision to be the Holt/Cat Subdivision. Approved 7 – 0. Page 4 of 46 Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 5 December 5, 2017 Legislative Regular Agenda G. Public Hearing and possible recommendation on a request to rezone approximately 768.9 acres in the Lewis P. Dyches Survey, located generally at the southeast corner of Ronald Reagan Blvd. and County Road 245 from Planned Unit Development (PUD) with General Commercial (C-3) and Residential Single-Family (RS) base zoning to Planned Unit Development (PUD) with Residential Single-Family (RS) base zoning, to be known as Sun City PUD Amendment (REZ-2017-011) - Chris Yanez, Assistant Planning Director (action required) Yanez presented letters G, H and I as one presentation. He explained that all agreements have the same standards and are an extension of Sun City. The proposed PUD will allow for the following: Land use predictability: a list of excluded uses have been included in the PUD to allow for improved land use protections on key commercial/retail portions of the property. Improved Architectural Standards: the developer will meet all commercial design requirements of the UDC and has committed to follow additional design requirements for the residential component of the development. Tree Removal: the applicant is requesting to remove trees consistent with the tree protection and mitigation requirements of the UDC. Additionally, the applicant proposes to set aside and preserve an approximately 16 acre area of significant existing tree growth. Yanez explained that each parcel would have its own PUD agreement to allow future changes of ownership without affecting all the properties. These are also tied to Utility Agreements which cap the number of LUE’s per each development. Pete Verdiccio, the applicant’s delegate, presented the PUD basics and what they are proposing. The Public Hearing was opened by Chair Schroeder. Michael Wendtland, 509 Salt Creek, expressed concern about the greenbelt behind his home in Sun City. He said the map was not clear about what was proposed but he wanted to go on record to declare that he did not want the greenbelt developed. Sue Cavanaugh, 121 Hobby St, had a question about the proposed multi-family development and expressed concern about future traffic on CR 245. James Hamilton, 836 Hamilton Lane, stated he was promised a wooded area behind his house and did not want this development. Chair Schroeder closed the hearing with no other speakers coming forth. Motion by Brashear to recommend approval to city council of the rezoning of 768.9 acres as presented. Second by Bargainer. Approved 7 – 0. H. Public Hearing and possible recommendation on a request to rezone approximately 120.5 acres in the Lewis P. Dyches and Fredrick Foy Surveys, located at the intersection of Ronald Reagan Blvd. and County Road 245 from Agricultural (AG) to Planned Unit Development (PUD) with General Commercial (C-3), Low Density Multifamily (MF-1), and Residential Single-Family (RS) base zoning, to be known as Somerset Hills (REZ-2017-012) - Chris Yanez, Assistant Planning Director (action required) Chair Schroeder opened the Public Hearing and with no speakers coming forth, closed the hearing. Motion by Brashear to recommend rezoning of approximately 377.6 acres, instead of the 120.5 as posted, known as Somerset Hills from Agricultural (AG) to Planned Unit Development (PUD) Page 5 of 46 Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 5 December 5, 2017 with General Commercial (C-3), Low Density Multifamily (MF-1), and Residential Single- Family (RS) base zoning with a modification to the PUD that any proposed amendments 10% or less to the existing PUD would be reviewed administratively, different from the 20% stated amendment requirement. Second by Marler. Approved 7 – 0. I. Public Hearing and possible recommendation of on a request to rezone approximately 120.5 acres in the Lewis P. Dyches Survey, located at the southwest corner of Ronald Reagan Blvd. and County Road 245 from Agricultural (AG) to Planned Unit Development (PUD) with General Commercial (C-3), High Density Multifamily (MF-2), Low Density Multifamily (MF-1), Townhome (TH), Two- Family (TF) and Residential Single-Family (RS) base zoning, to be known as Highland Village (REZ-2017-010) – Chris Yanez, Assistant Planning Director (action required) Chair Schroeder opened the Public Hearing and with no speakers coming forth, closed the hearing. Motion by Brashear to recommend rezoning of approximately 120.5 acres known as Highland Village from Agricultural (AG) to Planned Unit Development (PUD) with General Commercial (C-3), High Density Multifamily (MF-2), Low Density Multifamily (MF-1), Townhome (TH), Two-Family (TF) and Residential Single-Family (RS) base zoning with a modification to the PUD that any proposed amendments 10% or less to the existing PUD would be reviewed administratively, different from the 20% stated amendment requirement. Second by Fuller. Approved 7 – 0. J. Public Hearing and possible action on a Subdivision Variance from the right-of-way dedication requirements of the Unified Development Code for the Combined Preliminary and Final Plat of the Daniel Subdivision generally located at the 2300 N. Austin Avenue. (WAV-2017-004) Chris Yanez, Assistant Planning Director. Ben Daniel, applicant, explained that he would not sign the ROW dedication and would force an action of eminent domain by the city. HE wants to subdivide the property and redevelop. He feels the city should go to the other side of the road for additional ROW. Brashear explained that he feels that a variance should be for extraordinary measures and that this application does not fit that definition. Chair Schroeder opened the public hearing. Dwight Richter, 206 S. Main Street, expressed concerns about allowing the variance. He owns the adjoining property to the north and purchased the property because of projected growth in this area. He asks for denial of the request. Chair Schroeder closed the public hearing with no other speakers coming forth. Motion by Marler to postpone action on this item until the next meeting on January 16, 2018 to allow for legal review of possible conditions that can be placed with a Variance. Second by Brashear. Approved 7 – 0. K. Consideration and possible action on a Preliminary/Final Plat for the Daniel Subdivision, located at 2300 N. Austin Ave. (PFP-2017-004) Chris Yanez, Assistant Planning Director. Yanez presented the case. This preliminary final plat creates 3 non-residential lots. Access to the site is off of N. Austin Avenue and David Ferretti Drive. Parkland dedication does not apply. The applicant is required to provide right-of-way along N. Austin Avenue. A subdivision variance to Page 6 of 46 Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 5 December 5, 2017 the right-of-way dedication along Austin Avenue is being requested with case WAV-2017-004. Therefore the plat requires P&Z approval. Chair Schroeder opened the Public Hearing and with no speakers coming forth, closed the hearing. Motion by Brashear to recommend a statutory disapproval which allows for the processing later of the Daniel Subdivision plat. Second by Fuller. Approved 7 – 0. L. Public Hearing and possible action on a request to rezone approximately 72 acres in the Low BC Survey, located at 250 Westinghouse Drive from Business Park (BP) District to a Planned Unit Development (PUD) District. (REZ-2016-039) Sofia Nelson, Planning Director. Bargainer recused himself and Perthuis took a chair. Nelson presented the case. The applicant has requested to rezone the undeveloped 72 acres along the north and south sides of Mays Street to a Planned Unit Development. This Planned Unit Development (PUD) seeks to realize the vision of an employment center by establishing flexible development and building standards that will accommodate a land plan that allows for guidance, flexibility and create a sustainable long-term framework for build-out. The community will be built in phases, but still maintain flexibility in building placement, people movement, and traffic flow. It allows the evolution of living space designs, work place environments, supporting services, and hospitality and entertainment corridors. This PUD focuses less on where uses go exactly and more on adaptability to adjust building types, footprints, and public spaces as the community evolves. She explained that the TIRZ will finance the roadway in this area. Chair Schroeder opened the Public Hearing and with no speakers coming forth, closed the hearing. Motion by Pitts to recommend approval of the rezoning of 72 acres in the Low BC Survey, located at 250 Westinghouse Drive from Business Park (BP) District to a Planned Unit Development (PUD) District. Second by Marler. Approved 7 – 0. M. Public Hearing and possible action on a request to amend the existing Summit at Rivery PUD for approximately 31.94 acres in the following subdivisions: Brownstone at the Summit Phase 1, Brownstone at Summit Phase 2 -4, Brownstone at Summit Phase 5-6, a portion of lot 4 block "A" lots 1,2,3,5,6 in the Rivery Park Subdivision II and Lot 2 Block "A" in the Rivery Park Subdivision, located at 1500 Rivery Blvd. (REZ-2017-020) Sofia Nelson, Planning Director. Nelson presented the case. The applicant is requesting two types of amendments. The first amendment relates to the areas depicted as Zone B - the land bounded by Rivery Boulevard, the extension of Wolf Ranch Parkway, Woodlawn Avenue, and Hersey Avenue. The plan for this area is to develop an urban residential and retail mixed-use building between Wolf Ranch Parkway and Hershey Avenue, along with a structured parking garage. The current PUD does not allow for multi-family on the first floor (within the designated Zone B) or more than 75% of the total usable area of the buildings. This amendment proposes to allow 30 units of residential on the first floor and a maximum of 90% of the building space for residential. The second amendment relates to requirements for signage. The monument signs long-proposed for this development have been designed and the total height of the proposed stone structure exceeds the 8-foot limitation previously approved for the project. As the development has matured, Page 7 of 46 Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 5 December 5, 2017 now is the time to provide cohesive architectural branding elements to the site. These monument features do contain signage but are designed to be site elements focused on the Summit brand and do not include tenant identification. The one exception is a blade sign on two of the monuments for the Sheraton Hotel and Conference Center, which will need identification on Rivery Blvd when the Zone B building is erected and the view of the Hotel from Rivery Blvd is blocked. Jeff Novak, the applicant, explained that the increase in residential spaces will not be at the detriment of the TIRZ from lost commercial uses. He stated the income from this area has already exceeded the TIRZ estimated income. Chair Schroeder opened the Public Hearing. Brian Ortego, 125 Cedar Elm Lane, asked for verification that the financial performance of the TIRZ is meeting the debt of the city in this area and feels like the 90% residential gives away too much money. He stated he supports the increase in signage. Chair Schroeder closed the hearing with no other speakers coming forth. Motion by Pitts to recommend approval to city council to amend the existing Summit at Rivery PUD and allow a maximum of 90% residential of building space in zone B2 and to approve the additional signage as presented. Second by Fuller. Approved 7 – 0. Bargainer returned to the dais and Perthuis returned to the audience. N. Updates: a. 2018 Planning and Zoning Meeting Calendar. b. The next meeting of the Planning & Zoning Commission may be on Tuesday, January 16, 2018. O. Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Subdivision Variance from the Connections to Major Streets requirement of Section 12.05.010.A of the Unified Development Code for the proposed Patience Ranch Subdivision (WAV-2017-005) Chelsea Irby, Planner, and Andreina Davila-Quintero, Current Planning Manager - This item was postponed per request of the applicant. Motion by Pitts, second by Bargainer to adjourn at 7:40 pm. ____________________________________ ____________________________________ Josh Schroeder, Chair Attest, Tim Bargainer Page 8 of 46 City of Georgetown, Texas Planning and Zoning January 16, 2018 SUBJECT: Consideration and possible action o n a Preliminary Plat for the Georgetown Retail Land III Subdivision, lo c ated at 4652 Williams Drive, als o known as Ced ar Breaks Wes t (PP -2017-003) - Nathan Jones -Meyer, P lanner ITEM SUMMARY: Background: This p reliminary p lat is for 16.75 acres o f c ommerc ial property currently zoned C -1 (Loc al Co mmercial). The ap p licant is s ubdivid ing the p ro p erty into three lo ts. The sub ject site has main fro ntage o n Williams Drive and bac ks up to residential p ro p erties (Woodlake). FINANCIAL IMPACT: None studied at this time. SUBMITTED BY: Nathan Jo nes-Meyer, Planner and Chels ea Irb y, Planner ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Staff Report Backup Material Attachment 1 - Location Map Exhibit Attachment 2 - Preliminary Plat Backup Material Page 9 of 46 Georgetown Planning Department Staff Report Cedar Breaks West – Preliminary Plat Page 1 of 2 Report Date: January 12, 2018 File No: PP-2017-003 Project Planner: Nathan Jones-Meyer, Planner and Chelsea Irby, Planner Item Details Project Name: Cedar Breaks West Project Address: 4652 Williams Drive Applicant: Alexa Francisco (Stantec) Owner: Georgetown Retail Land III Total Acreage: 16.75 acres Legal Description: AW0232 AW0232 - Fish, J. Sur., ACRES 16.742 Plat Summary Total Lots: 3 Blocks: 1 Heritage Trees: 11 Site Information The site is located 4652 Williams Drive, just west of the intersection of Williams Drive and D B Wood Road. Location Map Page 10 of 46 Planning Department Staff Report Cedar Breaks West – Preliminary Plat Page 2 of 2 Background This preliminary plat is for 16.75 acres of commercial property currently zoned C -1 (Local Commercial). The applicant is subdividing the property into three lots. The subject site has main frontage on Williams Drive and backs up to residential properties (Woodlake). Utilities The subject site is located within the City of Georgetown’s service area for water and wastewater. The site subject site is located within the PEC service area for electric. It is anticipated that there is adequate capacity to serve this property either by existing capacity or developer participation in upgrades to infrastructure. Transportation Lot 1 of the subject site has inbound and outbound access from Williams Drive and Cedar Lake Boulevard. Lot 2 and Lot 3 of the subject site have inbound and outbound access from Williams Drive and Wildwood Drive. Parkland Dedication Not applicable for commercial property. Attachments Attachment 1 – Location Map Attachment 2 – Preliminary Plat Page 11 of 46 B O O T Y S C R O S S IN G RD N I H 3 5 LA KEWAYDR DEL WEBBBLVD N ORT H W E S T B L V D SERENADADR T E XASDR W HISP E RI N G W I N D D R B E R R Y C R E EKDR SHELL R D WI L L I A M S D R SHE L L R D LOGAN R A N C H R D SANALOMA DR FM 3405 WIL L I A M S D R SH E L L R D SH E L L R D DEL W E B B B L V D §¨¦35 WILL I A M S D R D B W O O D R D BOOTYS CROSSING RD WI L L I A M S D R D B W O O D R D PP-2017-003 Attachment #1 Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only ¯ Location Map LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ 0 0.75 1.5Mi Page 12 of 46 Tel. (512) 328-0011 Fax (512) 328-0325 221 West Sixth Street, Suite 600 Austin, Texas 78701 Copyright © 2017 TBPE # F-6324 TBPLS # F-10194230 Page 13 of 46 LINE TABLE CURVE TABLE Tel. (512) 328-0011 Fax (512) 328-0325 221 West Sixth Street, Suite 600 Austin, Texas 78701 Copyright © 2017 TBPE # F-6324 TBPLS # F-10194230 Page 14 of 46 Tel. (512) 328-0011 Fax (512) 328-0325 221 West Sixth Street, Suite 600 Austin, Texas 78701 Copyright © 2017 TBPE # F-6324 TBPLS # F-10194230 Page 15 of 46 City of Georgetown, Texas Planning and Zoning January 16, 2018 SUBJECT: Consideration and possible action o n a Preliminary Plat for the Oakmont Subdivision, loc ated ap p ro ximately one mile s o uthwes t o f the inters ec tion of Bo o ty Cro s s ing and Williams Drive (P P-2017-006) - S o fia Nels on, CNU-A, Planning Direc tor ITEM SUMMARY: Background: The p ro p erty was annexed o n May 23, 2017 b y Ord inance 2017-37 (ANX-2017-001) and rezoned on June 27, 2017 to Res idential Single-F amily (RS) Dis tric t by Ordinanc e 2017-42 (R EZ-2017-002). This p reliminary plat is to c reate a 76-lot residential s ub d ivis ion, cons is ting o f 72 res idential lo ts, 4 open spac e lo ts and 3,956 linear feet of s treets . FINANCIAL IMPACT: None studied at this time. SUBMITTED BY: Chels ea Irby, Planner and Sofia Nelson, CNU-A, P lanning Directo r ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Staff Report Backup Material Attachment 1 - Location Map Exhibit Attachment 2 - Preliminary Plat Exhibit Page 16 of 46 Georgetown Planning Department Staff Report Oakmont Subdivision Preliminary Plat PP-2017-006 Page 1 of 2 Report Date: January 12, 2018 File No: PP-2017-006 Project Planner: Chelsea Irby, Planner and Sofia Nelson, CNU-A, Planning Director Item Details Project Name: Oakmont Subdivision Project Address: Southwest of the intersection of Booty Crossing and Williams Drive Total Acreage: 23.527 acres Legal Description: WRIGHT, D. SUR., ACRES 24.2227 Applicant: Matkin Hoover Engineering and Surveying, c/o Dan Jackson Owner: Oakmont Georgetown LLC, c/o Scott Hall Overview of Applicant’s Request The applicant is requesting approval of a Preliminary Plat for a 76-lot residential subdivision to be known as the Oakmont Subdivision. Page 17 of 46 Planning Department Staff Report Oakmont Subdivision Preliminary Plat PP-2017-006 Page 2 of 2 Plat Summary Proposed Residential Lots: 72 Open Space/Drainage Lots: 4 Total Lots: 76 Residential Blocks: 6 Linear Feet of Street: 3,956 Heritage Trees: 49 (24 to remain and 25 to be mitigated) Site Information The subject site is located southwest of the intersection of Booty Crossing and Williams Drive. It is bordered by single-family residential on all sides. Background The property was annexed on May 23, 2017, by Ordinance 2017-37 (ANX-2017-001) and rezoned on June 27, 2017, to Residential Single-Family (RS) District by Ordinance 2017-42 (REZ-2017-002). This preliminary plat is to create a 76-lot residential subdivision. An Administrative Exception (AE-2017-010) was conditionally approved on December 18, 2017, related to the buffer wall requirement along Country Road, which is a major collector per the City’s Overall Transportation Plan (OTP). The administrative exception allows for a 3-foot masonry wall with ornamental trees planted at 15-foot intervals on each side of Country Road. Utilities The subject site is located within the City of Georgetown’s service area for water and wastewater. The site subject site is located within PEC’s service area for electric. It is anticipated that there is adequate capacity to serve this property either by existing capacity or developer participation in upgrades to infrastructure. Transportation The subject site’s inbound and outbound access is from Booty Crossing Road, a collector street. The existing driveway access will be removed and main access will occur at the intersection of Booty Crossing Road and Pecan Lane. A new major collector, Country Road, will be constructed through the subdivision. Parkland Dedication Parkland dedication requirements are being met by fee-in-lieu of parkland dedication. The fees will be paid at $250 per unit to Zone 7. Attachments Attachment 1 – Location Map Attachment 2 – Preliminary Plat Page 18 of 46 WilliamsDr WilliamsDr W illia msDr Lake w ay Dr Lakeway D r DB W o o d R d Booty'sCrossingRd Shell Rd ShllRd NAustinAve NColleg e StRiveryBlvd N A u s t i n A v e W olfRanchPkw y S eren a da D r EMorro w St N orth w estBlvd Lake w ay Dr §¨¦35 PP-2017-006 Attachment #1 Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only ¯ Location Map LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ 0 0.5 1Mi Page 19 of 46 Page 20 of 46 Page 21 of 46 Page 22 of 46 Page 23 of 46 Page 24 of 46 City of Georgetown, Texas Planning and Zoning January 16, 2018 SUBJECT: Consideration and possible action o n a Preliminary Final Plat fo r the Williams Drive Business Park Subdivision, lo cated at 4775 Williams Drive jus t wes t o f the inters ection of Williams Drive and Shell Road. (PP-2017-010), Nathan Jones -Meyer, P lanner ITEM SUMMARY: Background: This p reliminary p lat is for 9.29 ac res of commerc ial p ro p erty c urrently zoned C-1 (Lo cal Commerc ial). The ap p licant is s ubdivid ing the p ro p erty into 8 lots (6 c o mmercial and 2 drainage/o p en s p ace). The s ubjec t s ite has main frontage on Williams Drive and bac ks up to res id ential p ro p erties (Heritage Oaks, Sec tion 5). FINANCIAL IMPACT: None studied at this time. SUBMITTED BY: Nathan Jo nes-Meyer, Planner and Chels ea Irb y, Planner ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Staff Report Exhibit Attachment 1 - Location Map Exhibit Attachment 2 - Preliminary Plat Exhibit Page 25 of 46 Georgetown Planning Department Staff Report Williams Drive Business Park – Preliminary Plat Page 1 of 2 Report Date: January 12, 2018 File No: PP-2017-010 Project Planner: Nathan Jones-Meyer, Planner and Chelsea Irby, Planner Item Details Project Name: Williams Drive Business Park Project Address: 4775 Williams Drive Applicant: Dan Jackson (Matkin Hoover) Owner: David Shanks Total Acreage: 9.29 acres Legal Description: AW0232 AW0232 - Fish, J. Sur., ACRES 9.373 Plat Summary Total Lots: 8 (6 commercial and 2 drainage/open space) Blocks: 3 Site Information The site is located 4775 Williams Drive, just west of the intersection of Williams Drive and Shell Road. Location Map Page 26 of 46 Planning Department Staff Report Williams Drive Business Park – Preliminary Plat Page 2 of 2 Background This preliminary plat is for 9.29 acres of commercial property currently zoned C-1 (Local Commercial). The applicant is subdividing the property into 8 lots (6 commercial and 2 drainage/open space). The subject site has main frontage on Williams Drive and backs up to residential properties (Heritage Oaks, Section 5). Utilities The subject site is located within the City of Georgetown’s service area for water and wastewater. The site subject site is located within the PEC service area for electric. It is anticipated that there is adequate capacity to serve this property either by existing capacity or developer participation in upgrades to infrastructure. Transportation The site has access from Williams Drive. Verde Vista Drive will be extended and the lots have access from this roadway. Parkland Dedication Not applicable for commercial property. Attachments Attachment 1 – Location Map Attachment 2 – Preliminary Plat Page 27 of 46 D el W e b b B l v d D elWebbBlvd WilliamsDr WilliamsDr Willia msDr Lake w ay Dr Lakeway D r DB W o o d R d Booty'sCrossingRd Shell Rd ShellRd S h ell R d ")3405 NAustinAve N A u s t i n A v e ")262 Jim H o g g Rd S eren a da D r N orth w estBlvd Lake w ay Dr AirportRd N L a k e w o o d s D r ")262 S e d r o T rl ")2338 §¨¦35 PP-2017-010 Attachment #1 Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only ¯ Location Map LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ 0 0.5 1Mi Page 28 of 46 Page 29 of 46 Page 30 of 46 City of Georgetown, Texas Planning and Zoning January 16, 2018 SUBJECT: Public Hearing and possible action on a reques t fo r a Special Use Permit to allo w an indoor self- storage facility within the Lo cal Commerc ial (C-1) zoning district on the property lo cated at 1050 Wes tingho use (S UP -2017-009, Ind o o r Self-S torage at Vista P o inte on Westingho us e) Nathan Jo nes-Meyer, Planner ITEM SUMMARY: Background: The ap p licant has reques ted cons id eration of a Spec ial Us e P ermit (SUP) to allow an ind o o r self-sto rage facility within the Lo cal Commerc ial (C-1) dis tric t on the p ro p erty loc ated at 1050 Wes tingho use Road. Per Table 5.04.010 o f the UDC, an ind o o r self-storage fac ility may be p ermitted in the C -1 d is tric t s ubjec t to ap p ro val o f a S p ec ial Use Permit by the City C o uncil. Public Comment: As o f the d ate of this report, no written public c o mments have b een received. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. The applic ant has paid the required ap p lic atio n fees . SUBMITTED BY: Nathan Jo nes, Planner and Sofia Nelson, CNU-A, P lanning Directo r ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Staff Report Backup Material Attachment 1 - Location Backup Material Attachment 2 - Future Land Us e Backup Material Attachment 3 - Zoning Backup Material Attachment 4 - Letter of Intent Backup Material Attachment 5 - Conceptual Plan Backup Material Page 31 of 46 Georgetown Planning Department Staff Report Indoor Self-Storage at Vista Pointe Special Use Permit SUP-2017-009 Page 1 of 9 Report Date: January 12, 2018 File No: SUP-2017-009 Project Planner: S. Nathan Jones-Meyer, Planner Item Details Project Name: Indoor Self-Storage at Vista Pointe Project Address: 1050 Westinghouse Road Total Acreage: 2.7 acres Legal Description: 2.7 acres of the Barney C. Low Survey Existing Zoning: Local Commercial (C-1) Applicant: Tom Groll Engineering, c/o Tom Groll, P.E. Developer: Spiegel Development Inc., c/o David Spiegel Property Owner: Austin Land Investments, LLC Overview of Applicant’s Request The applicant requests consideration of a Special Use Permit (SUP) to allow an indoor self- storage facility located behind a row of retail store fronts as permitted within the Local Commercial (C-1) zoning district on the property located at 1050 Westinghouse Road. Per Table 5.04.010 of the UDC, an indoor self-storage facility may be permitted in the C-1 district subject to approval of a SUP by the City Council. Page 32 of 46 Planning Department Staff Report Indoor Self-Storage at Vista Pointe Special Use Permit SUP-2017-009 Page 2 of 9 Site Information Location: The subject site is located along Westinghouse Road, approximately 1,300 feet east of the intersection of Westinghouse Road and North Mays Street. It is located on the north end of a planned residential subdivision that will include both single family and multi-family housing types known as Vista Pointe. Physical Characteristics: The subject site has approximately 310 feet of frontage along Westinghouse Road. The property is square in shape and is generally flat. Until recently, much of the area was undeveloped ranch and farm land. However, as physical improvements of Westinghouse Road have begun, much of the area has been developing and it is transitioning into a diverse set of land uses, including both residential, civic, commercial and industrial uses. Surrounding Properties: Location Zoning Future Land Use Existing Use North Industrial (IN) and Business Park (BP) Employment Center Industrial Park South Low-Density Multi-family (MF- 1) Mixed Use Community Under Construction as a Residential Development East Local Commercial (C-1) Mixed Use Community Undeveloped land West Local Commercial (C-1) Employment Center Undeveloped land Page 33 of 46 Planning Department Staff Report Indoor Self-Storage at Vista Pointe Special Use Permit SUP-2017-009 Page 3 of 9 Aerial Image of the Subject Site Page 34 of 46 Planning Department Staff Report Indoor Self-Storage at Vista Pointe Special Use Permit SUP-2017-009 Page 4 of 9 Conceptual Overall Site Layout Page 35 of 46 Planning Department Staff Report Indoor Self-Storage at Vista Pointe Special Use Permit SUP-2017-009 Page 5 of 9 Conceptual Site Elevations to Facing Westinghouse Property History The subject site was annexed into the City in 2011 (Ord. 2011-55) as part of a larger tract. In 2014, the property was rezoned to its current zoning designation, Local Commercial (C-1) (Ord. 2014- 63). If approved, the proposed project would require the following applications: Final Plat to be approved by the Planning Director Site Development Plan to be approved by the Planning Director Building Permits to be approved by the Building Official 2030 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use: The 2030 Future Land Use category for the subject site is Mixed Use Community. The Mixed Use Community category is described in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan as appropriate for larger scale, creatively planned communities, where a mix of residential types and densities Page 36 of 46 Planning Department Staff Report Indoor Self-Storage at Vista Pointe Special Use Permit SUP-2017-009 Page 6 of 9 are complemented by supporting retail and small to medium scale office development. This category also encourages more compact, sustainable development patterns that reduce auto trips, increase connectivity and encourage walking and use of transit. Transportation The subject site’s inbound and outbound access is on Westinghouse Road. Westinghouse Road is identified as an existing major arterial road, a street designed to carry large volumes of traffic into or out of the city that provide for efficient vehicular movement between distant locations. Utilities The subject site is located within the City’s service area for water, wastewater, and electric. It is anticipated that there is adequate capacity to serve this property either by existing capacity or developer participation in upgrades to infrastructure. Zoning District The C-1 zoning district is intended to provide areas for commercial and retail activities that primarily serve residential areas. Uses within the C-1 zoning district should have pedestrian access to adjacent and nearby residential areas, but are not appropriate along residential streets or residential collectors. The C-1 zoning district is more appropriate along major and minor thoroughfares and corridors. Typical uses in this district include general retail, office, restaurants, and general office. Certain land uses, including indoor self-storage require approval of a Special Use Permit (SUP). The purpose for requiring a SUP is to allow for City Council to review the location, design, and intensity of certain land uses on an individual basis to determine if the specific use is appropriate at the proposed location. Additionally, it provides the City Council the option to establish conditions for the specific use within the zoning district to help mitigate and reduce the impact that the use may have on the adjacent properties and vicinity. Staff Analysis Staff has reviewed the applicant’s request to establish an indoor self-storage facility on the site located at 1050 Westinghouse Road. The applicant is proposing that approval of this SUP be made with the condition that the indoor self-storage facility be located completely behind the portion of the site dedicated to retail and commercial space as permitted by right in the C-1 zoning district (Attachment 4, Letter of Intent), with the exception of the leasing office space. Staff has conducted its review of the request based on this condition. The UDC, in Section 3.07.030.C, states that the City Council may approve an application for an SUP where it reasonably determines that there will be no significant negative impact upon residents of surrounding property or upon the general public. The City Council shall consider the following criteria in its review: Page 37 of 46 Planning Department Staff Report Indoor Self-Storage at Vista Pointe Special Use Permit SUP-2017-009 Page 7 of 9 1. The proposed special use is not detrimental to the health, welfare, and safety of the surrounding neighborhood or its occupants. Findings Complies It does not appear that the proposed indoor self-storage will be directly injurious or detrimental to the public health, welfare or safety of the neighborhood. The proposed use is compatible with the surrounding land uses particularly when located behind the proposed commercial and retail center along the street frontage. By placing the proposed indoor self- storage completely behind commercial and retail uses, the subject property will maintain a commercial frontage as envisioned for this corridor . If approved the proposed use would need to comply with the development standards required in the C-1 district. 2. The proposed conceptual site layout, circulation plan, and design are harmonious with the character of the surrounding area. Findings Complies with Conditions The conceptual layout has been reviewed by staff in order to determine (on a preliminary basis) if the proposed site plan would be in conformance with City codes, including the additional standards outlined in UDC Section 5.04.020.Q for indoor self-storage facilities. The proposed Conceptual Plan (Attachment 5) shows store fronts facing Westinghouse Road with the self- storage facility located behind the storefront, near the rear of the lot. Access to the site would come from Vista View Drive; however, the City continues to work with the applicant to determine if another access point may be located along Westinghouse Road. The proposed site layout is in conformance with City standards and will be formalized during the review of the site development plan. The surrounding uses include low density multi-family and training facility for the Department of Public Safety. The site layout, circulation plan, and design fit in well with these surrounding uses. The self-storage facility, and, importantly, the retail uses, will serve an important role in continuing to transform Westinghouse Road into a commercial corridor with supporting residential uses. 3. The proposed use does not negatively impact existing uses in the area and in the City through impacts on public infrastructure such as roads, parking facilities, and water and sewer systems and on public services such as police and fire protection and solid waste collection and the ability of existing infrastructure and services to adequately provide services. Findings Complies Page 38 of 46 Planning Department Staff Report Indoor Self-Storage at Vista Pointe Special Use Permit SUP-2017-009 Page 8 of 9 The proposed use would not negatively impact existing uses in the area and in the City through impacts on public infrastructure such as roads, parking facilities, and water and sewer systems and on public services such as police and fire protection and solid waste collection and the ability of existing infrastructure and services to adequately provide services. The proposed project will have frontage on Westinghouse Road (a major arterial) and Vista View Drive (a residential collector). In addition, any public improvements that may be required to provide the necessary water and wastewater utilities for the site will be the responsibility of the developer as a part of the subdivision plat approval process. 4. The proposed use does not negatively impact existing uses in the area and in the City through the creation of noise, glare, fumes, dust, smoke, vibration, fire hazard or other injurious or noxious impact. Findings Complies The proposed use would not negatively impact existing uses in the area through the creation of noise, glare, fumes, dust, smoke, vibration, fire hazard or other injurious or noxious impact. Westinghouse Road is in the process of redeveloping from a primarily industrial and agricultural corridor to a commercial one with supporting residential uses. There are still many industrial uses in the immediate area of the subject property that create a more intense impact than the indoor self-storage facility. Additionally, the inclusion of retail and commercial store fronts facing Westinghouse Road will reduce any negative impacts associated with the self- storage facility by adding a mix of uses to the subject site. General Findings Based on all the information presented, staff has found that the requested SUP for an indoor self- storage facility promotes the following goals established in the Comprehensive Plan: 1.A – Encourage a balanced mix of residential, commercial, and employment uses at varying densities and intensities, to reflect a gradual transition from urban to suburban to rural development. The proposed indoor self-storage facility is to be developed behind a retail component that will further the establishment of a commercial and retail corridor along Westinghouse Road and will serve the residential neighborhoods located to the south of the subject site . In addition, this facility will serve a unique purpose in the area by incorporating a mixed-use element to the design. This design element will differentiate the project from other nearby indoor self-storage facilities that do not include a mix of uses. 1.A.2 – Reserve and rezone land ideally suited for long-termed commercial and employment uses and prevent its use for residential subdivisions. Page 39 of 46 Planning Department Staff Report Indoor Self-Storage at Vista Pointe Special Use Permit SUP-2017-009 Page 9 of 9 The proposed indoor self-storage facility, with the additional store fronts along the street frontage, will further the development of a retail and commercial corridor along Westinghouse road. Staff finds that the requested SUP complies with conditions the four (4) preceding factors for granting an SUP. Should the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval with conditions the SUP request (as proposed by the applicant), the following conditions should be made part of the SUP Ordinance: 1. The indoor self-storage facility shall be located completely behind (south) of a building that houses other land uses permitted by right under the Local Commercial (C-1) zoning district as depicted in the attached Conceptual Plan. 2. Approval of the site development plan for the subject site must include the proposed indoor self-storage facility and retail or commercial store fronts as shown in the attached Conceptual Plan. Public Comments As required by the Unified Development Code, all property owners within a 200 foot radius of the subject property that are located within City limits were notified of the SUP application (4 notices mailed), a legal notice advertising the public hearing was placed in the Sun Newspaper (December 24, 2017) and signs were posted on-site. To date, staff has received no written comments. Attachments Attachment 1 – Location Map Attachment 2 – Future Land Use Map Attachment 3 – Zoning Map Attachment 4 – Letter of Intent Attachment 5 – Conceptual Plan Page 40 of 46 W E S T I N G H O U S E R D §¨¦35 S IH 35 NB S IH 35 SB S I H 3 5 FW Y S B S I H 3 5 F W Y N B N M A Y S S T R A B B I T H I L L R D S C E N IC LA KEDR TERA V I S T A C LUB D R F M 1 4 6 0 W E S T I N G H O U S E R D K E L L E Y D R S I H 35 FR S I H 3 5 FW YN I H 3 5 F W Y N IH 35 F R CERVINIADR BLUEAG A V E LN T E R A V I S T A X I N G RIDGEBENDDR MONT E R O S A L N WESTM EADOWTRL C E N T E R B R O O K P L FAIRMEADOW DR GREENSIDE D R C L E A R V I E W D R GREATVIEW DR D A Y LIL Y L O O P BRIAR P A R K D R P A R K VISTATRL HEWL E T T LOOP SACHEN ST C O M M E R C E B L V D P A R K C E N T R A L B L V D CROSSVI N E T R L W IN DING C REEKPL WOODVISTA PL R O C K M I L L L N S A N S O N E D R W OOD H A V E N T R L S U M M E R A Z U RES T C H E R O K E E R O S E C I R WOODLEDGE PL WIN D B E R R Y C T LILY TU RF C V CALDW E L L P A L M CIR GATEWAY DR K E M P W O O D C T N M A Y S S T TE R A V I S T A C L U B DR C L E A R V I E W D R SUP-2017-009Exhibit #1 Coordi nate System : Texas State Plane/Centr al Zone/N AD 83/U S FeetCartographic Data For G eneral Plann ing Pu rpo ses Only ¯ Location Map LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ 0 0.25 0.5Mi Page 41 of 46 W E S T I N G H O U S E R D R A B B I T H I L L R D N M A Y S S T P A R K C E N T R A L B L V D C O M M E R C E B L V D N M A Y S S T Coord inate System: Texas Sta te Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Plan ning Pu rposes Only ¯ Future Land Use / Over all Transportation Plan Exhibit #2 SUP -201 7-009 Leg en d Thoroughfare Future Land Use Institutional Regional Com mercial Com munity Commercial Emp loym ent Center Low Density Residential Min ing Mixed Use Comm unity Mixed Use Neighborhood Center Mode rate Density Residential Op en Space Specialty Mixed Use Area Ag / Rural Residential Existing Collector Existing F reeway Existing Major Arterial Existing Minor Arterial Existing Ramp Pro p osed Collector Pro p osed Freeway Pro p sed Frontage Road Pro p osed M ajor Arterial Pro p osed M inor Arterial Pro p osed Railroad Hig h Density Residential Legend Sit eParce lsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ 0 250 500Ft Page 42 of 46 W E S T I N G H O U S E R D R A B B I T H I L L R D N M A Y S S T P A R K C E N T R A L B L V D C O M M E R C E B L V D N M A Y S S T Zoning InformationSUP-2017-009Exhibit #3 Co o rdi nate System : Texas State Plane/Central Zo ne/N A D 83/US FeetCartographic D ata For Gener al Plann ing Pu rposes Only LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ ¯ 0 250 500FtPage 43 of 46 November 8, 2017 To: Georgetown Planning Department From: Austin Land Investments LLC Please consider issuing a Special Use Permit for our easterly 2.5 acre commerical site for a mixed use mini storage and retail project. Currently and in the forceable future there is not and will not be adequate traffic counts for a pure retail development. It is our belief that Westinghouse Road will never be a truly viable retail corridor with the amount of large scale retail, the new frontage road (Mayes), within two miles and the tremendous synergy they currently have. We feel we will never be able to fill a all retail space development and make it economically viable for us or the city. With the approved land use to our east which is currently under construction, vehicle and truck registration and testing will hurt our property and any prospect of pure retail. There will also be a issue with ingress and egress that will hinder pure retail, but would be acceptable to storage use. With all the new apartments and housing in the immediate area storage makes sense. Having a mixed use project with retail and storage gives us the economic viability, added security and higher probability of success. Furthermore, after a discussion with planning staff we will agree to build the storage in a manner that will allow it to be converted to a office building in the event storage ever becomes not viable. Thank you for your consideration. Page 44 of 46 # SCHEMATIC ONLY Page 45 of 46 A2.1 SCHEMATIC ONLY K.DRAHCIR O T K C OTS N 2 8617 DERETSIGER T C E T I H CRA S T A TE O F SAXET RETAIL SIGNAGE RETAIL SIGNAGE RETAIL SIGNAGE RETAIL SIGNAGE RETAIL SIGNAGE RETAIL SIGNAGE RETAIL SIGNAGE RETAIL SIGNAGE Page 46 of 46