The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda_P&Z_12.16.2014Notice of Meeting for the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Georgetown December 16, 2014 at 6:00 PM at City Council Chambers, 101 E. 7th Street, Georgetown The City of Georgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If you require assistance in participating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the ADA, reasonable assistance, adaptations, or accommodations will be provided upon request. Please contact the City at least four (4) days prior to the scheduled meeting date, at (512) 930-3652 or City Hall at 113 East 8th Street for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. Call to Order Pledge of Allegiance Comments from the Chair - Welcome and Meeting Procedures Action from Executive Session Public Wishing to Address the Board On a subject that is posted on this agenda: Please fill out a speaker registration form which can be found at the Board meeting. Clearly print your name, the letter of the item on which you wish to speak, and present it to the Staff Liaison, preferably prior to the start of the meeting. You will be called forward to speak when the Board considers that item. On a subject not posted on the agenda: Persons may add an item to a future Board agenda by filing a written request with the Staff Liaison no later than one week prior to the Board meeting. The request must include the speaker's name and the specific topic to be addressed with sufficient information to inform the board and the public. For Board Liaison contact information, please logon to http://government.georgetown.org/category/boards-commissions/. A - As of the deadline, no persons were signed up to speak on items other than what was posted on the agenda. Consent Agenda The Statutory Consent Agenda includes non-controversial and routine items that may be acted upon with one single vote. An item may be pulled from the Consent Agenda in order that it be discussed and acted upon individually as part of the Regular Agenda. B Consideration of the Minutes from the November 18, 2014, Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. C Consideration and possible action on a Preliminary Plat of 116.14 in the Joseph Fish Survey, Abstract 232, to be known as Lakeside Subdivision, located on the south side of Williams Drive west of Wildwood and Woodlake Drives, behind the Olde Oaks Estate and Woodlake subdivisions. D Consideration and possible action on a Revised Preliminary Plat for 43.922 acres in the William Addison Survey to be known as La Conterra, Sections 7 & 8, located on Naturita Drive and Ingnecia Drive. PP-2014-017 E Consideration and possible action on a Preliminary/Final Plat for 3.089 acres to be known as Pedernales Falls Drive and Rocky Hollow Creek Drive, located in northwest Sun City. Jordan J. Maddox, AICP, Principal Planner F Consideration and possible action on a Preliminary Plat for 37.47 acres to be known as Sun City Neighborhood 64, located between CR 245 and Pedernales Falls Drive. PP-2014-019 Jordan J. Maddox, AICP, Principal Planner G Acceptance of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan Annual Report -- Jordan J. Maddox, AICP, Principal Planner Legislative Regular Agenda H Public Hearing and possible action on a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, changing approximately 73 acres on the Future Land Use Plan from Employment Center to Moderate Density Residential for Three Forks Ranch, located near Airport Road and Brangus Road. CPA- 2014-003 Jordan J. Maddox, AICP, Principal Planner I Public Hearing and possible action on a Rezoning from a Planned Unit Development (PUD) District to 250 acres of Single-family Residential (RS) District, 19.85 acres of Low-Density Multifamily (MF-1) District, and 15.89 acres of Agriculture (AG) District in the David Wright Survey for Three Forks Ranch, located near Airport Road and Brangus Road. REZ-2014-029 Jordan J. Maddox, AICP, Principal Planner J Discussion Items: Update on the Unified Development Code Advisory Committee (UDCAC) meetings. (Chair Horne) Update on the Georgetown Transportation Advisory Board (GTAB) meetings. (Commissioner Rankin) Questions or comments from Commissioners-in-Training about the actions and matters considered on this agenda. Reminder of the January 20, 2015, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. Adjournment CERTIFICATE OF POSTING I, Jessica Brettle, City Secretary for the City of Georgetown, Texas, do hereby certify that this Notice of Meeting was posted at City Hall, 113 E. 8th Street, a place readily accessible to the general public at all times, on the ______ day of __________________, 2014, at __________, and remained so posted for at least 72 continuous hours preceding the scheduled time of said meeting. ____________________________________ Jessica Brettle, City Secretary City of Georgetown, Texas Planning and Zoning December 16, 2014 SUBJECT: Consideration of the Minutes from the November 18, 2014, Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: NA SUBMITTED BY: City of Georgetown, Texas Planning and Zoning December 16, 2014 SUBJECT: Consideration and possible action on a Preliminary Plat of 116.14 in the Joseph Fish Survey, Abstract 232, to be known as Lakeside Subdivision, located on the south side of Williams Drive west of Wildwood and Woodlake Drives, behind the Olde Oaks Estate and Woodlake subdivisions. ITEM SUMMARY: Background: The applicant proposes to develop 116.14 acres as a single family residential subdivision with 301 residential lots, 13 open space, drainage, and water detention/quality lots, 2 public parkland lots, and 3 commercial lots that are located at the entry from Williams Drive along the proposed Lakeside Ranch Road. The public parkland for the development proposes to provide 4.77 acres in 2 lots. Approval of an associated Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA-2014-003) is anticipated by the time of the Commission's meeting. Public Comment: Public notice is not required for a preliminary plat application. There have been several inquiries about the plat from nearby neighbors who made public comments during the rezoning process earlier in 2014. Recommended Motion: Approval of a Preliminary Plat of 116.14 in the Joseph Fish Survey, Abstract 232, to be known as Lakeside Subdivision. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. The applicant paid the required fees. SUBMITTED BY: Mike Elabarger, Senior Planner and Andrew Spurgin, Planning Director ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Staff Report Cover Memo Exhibit 1 - Location Map Backup Material Exhibit 2 - Proposed Preliminary Plat_Part 1 Backup Material Exhibit 3 - Proposed Preliminary Plat_Part 2 Backup Material Georgetown Planning Department Staff Report Lakeside Subdivision Preliminary Plat Page 1 of 4 Report Date: December 10, 2015 File No: PP-2014-012 Project Planner: Mike Elabarger, Senior Planner Item Details Project Name: Preliminary Plat of Lakeside Subdivision Project Address: 4840, 4844, and 4852 Williams Drive Location: Between and behind the Olde Oak Estates and Woodlake subdivisions (see Exhibit 1) Total Acreage: 116.14 acres Legal Description: 116.14 acres in the Joseph Fish Survey, Abstract 232 Applicant: Hank Smith, P.E., Texas Engineering Solutions Property Owner: Georgetown 116 Development, LP Contact: Hank Smith, P.E., Texas Engineering Solutions, LLC Proposed Lots: 301 residential, 3 non-residential, 13 open space, water detention/quality, 2 parkland lots Streets Proposed: 17,063 linear feet Parkland: Parkland requirements are being met by dedication of 4.77 acres, see Plat note 6 Heritage Trees: There are 30 Heritage Trees located on this plat, with 3 proposed for removal Existing Use: Undeveloped land Existing Zoning: Residential Single-family (RS) District (109.54 acres), Local Commercial (C-1) District (5.09 acres), Neighborhood Commercial (CN) District (1.51 acres) Growth Tier: Tier 2 Applicant’s Request The applicant proposes to develop 116.14 acres of undeveloped land into 301 residential lots and 3 non- residential lots, with 4.7 acres of dedicated parkland and associated roads and open space and water drainage lots. Site Information Location: The property is located on the south side of Williams Drive, bounded by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers property (Lake Georgetown) and the Olde Oake and Woodlake subdivisions. Connectivity is provided to the existing Woodlake subdivision through Moreland Drive and Cedar Lakes Boulevard, and a road stub of Salamander Street extending to the property to the west (the Gatlin Creek project per Ordinance 2012-037). Physical Characteristics: The property consists of four (4) tracts of land, all of which are undeveloped. The land is generally gently sloping to the southwest toward Lake Georgetown. A tree survey has indicated 30 Heritage trees. The plat was designed in conjunction with the City Urban Forester to ensure buildable areas within each residential lot that provide protection to the Heritage Trees. Protected Trees were also identified on the three proposed non-residential lots, and will be either preserved or mitigated for during the Site Plan review and approval process. Planning Department Staff Report Lakeside Subdivision Preliminary Plat Page 2 of 4 History The property was annexed in two portions per Annexation Ordinances 95-12 and 2014-34. The property was rezoned by City Council on June 24, 2014, per Ordinance 2014-38, from the Agriculture (AG) District to the Residential Single-family (RS), Neighborhood Commercial (CN), and Local Commercial (C-1) Districts; see excerpt below with Zoning Districts – yellow is RS, light pink is CN, light red is C-1. 2030 Plan Conformance The proposed Preliminary Plat is in general conformance with the 2030 Plan land use designation of Low Density Residential. This land use category supports single family detached neighborhoods at a density ranging between 1 and 3 dwelling units per gross acre; 301 residential lots over 109.54 acres equals a density of 2.75 dwelling units per gross acre. The non-residential portion of the plat (less than 7 acres) complies with the category in providing ‘complementary non-residential uses along arterial roadways’ (Williams Drive, an existing Major Arterial). See excerpt map below, where the light yellow is Low Density Residential, blue is Institutional, green is Open Space (floodplain from Lake Georgetown, or land owned by the Army Corps of Engineers), and orange is the Mixed Use Neighborhood Center category. This project is located within Tier 2 (Intermediate Growth Area) of the current City Growth Tier Map, notwithstanding annexation and zoning. Infrastructure facilities will be the responsibility of the developer to serve the property. Planning Department Staff Report Lakeside Subdivision Preliminary Plat Page 3 of 4 Utilities Utility services will be provided by City of Georgetown for electric, water, and wastewater. Public utility easements are being dedicated with this plat according to the City of Georgetown standards. Transportation This development will have a direct and primary access point from Williams Drive near Olde Oak Drive with the proposed Lakeside Ranch Road, a residential collector (65’ of right-of-way, 37’ of paved width) that serves as the primary “spine” road through the majority of the subdivision. Lakeside Ranch intersects with Cedar Lake Boulevard, which serves as a residential collector from that point northward to the point of connection with the Woodlake Subdivision; Cedar Lake Boulevard continues through the Woodlake Subdivision (platted as a 60’ right-of-way with approximately 37’ of pavement) to a stub at an unplatted 33.6 acre property in the Joseph Fish Survey owned by the Andice Development Company. The phasing plan, via plat note 17, restricts development of Phase 2 until Cedar Lake Boulevard connects to Williams Drive, which would occur through the Andice Development Company property previously noted. This connection back to Williams Drive serves as the other primary access point, as all trips from the subdivision must eventually get to Williams Drive, due to the subdivision being bound by Lake Georgetown. Planning Department Staff Report Lakeside Subdivision Preliminary Plat Page 4 of 4 A third point of connection is proposed with Moreland Drive (through the portion of the subdivision zoned Local Commercial, between Block L / Lot 1 and Block C / Lot 58), which would connect to an unplatted 2.884 acre property in the Joseph Fish Survey that is surrounded by several non-residential lots in the Woodlake Phase 6 subdivision plat. Moreland Drive is constructed between Woodlake Phase 5 / Lot 1 and Woodlake Phase 6 / Lots 4 and 5, and connects to Woodlake Drive, which in turn leads to a signalized intersection at Williams Drive. Thus, actual connectivity to this neighboring subdivision, and the ability to access the existing traffic signal at Williams Drive, will hinge on development of this unplatted property and continuation of the middle ‘link’ of Moreland, unless constructed by others. The fourth point of connection is to the northwest from Salamander Street to an approximately 115 acre property approved for a project known as Gatlin Creek, which has not developed yet. How, and when, that connection can be used is unknown, but because of the same physical constraint of Lake Georgetown to the south/west, trips from Salamander Street through this neighboring property will eventually end up on Williams Drive. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA-2014-003) is currently under comment review by the City; approval is anticipated by the time of the Commission’s meeting. Future Application(s) In order to proceed with development on this site, it will be necessary to obtain approval of Final Plats and infrastructure Construction Plans, which are administratively approved applications. Residential lots will develop with Building Permits. Non-residential lots will require on-site Site Plan and Construction Plan approvals, which are administratively approved applications. Staff Analysis Staff Recommendation and Basis: Staff supports the Preliminary Plat as it meets all of the requirements of the City’s Unified Development Code. Interdepartmental, Governmental and Agency Comments None Public Comments Public notice is not required for a preliminary plat application. There have been several inquiries about the plat from nearby residents who made public comments during the rezoning process earlier in 2014. Proposed Meetings Schedule December 16, 2014 – Planning and Zoning Commission Attachments Exhibit 1 – Location Map Exhibit 2 – Preliminary Plat C I T Y O F G E O R G E T O W N CITY OFGEORGETOWN C I T Y O F G E O R G E T O W N G e o r g eto w n E TJ Georgetown ETJ Georgetown ETJ G e o r g e t o w n E T J C E D A R LAKEBLVD T E R I C T W O O D S T O C K D R WILD W OODDR A C K E R R D SU N D AY SC H O OL D R WILLIAMS DR LE A N N E D RWINDHOLLOWDR C LIFFWOODD R O L D E O A K D R W O O D L A K E DR PP-2014-012 Exhibit #1 Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only 0 1,000 2,000Feet ¯ LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ Williams Dr S hellRdWilliams Dr D e l Web b Blvd Site City Limits Street Site ³ PP-2014-012 City of Georgetown, Texas Planning and Zoning December 16, 2014 SUBJECT: Consideration and possible action on a Revised Preliminary Plat for 43.922 acres in the William Addison Survey to be known as La Conterra, Sections 7 & 8, located on Naturita Drive and Ingnecia Drive. PP-2014-017 ITEM SUMMARY: Background: The applicant proposes to revise the Preliminary Plat to develop 43.922 acres that constitutes the total remaining acreage from the original approved Preliminary Plat for La Conterra, as a residential subdivision with 177 residential lots and 4 open space lots to allow for larger lots. This would be a reduction from the 200 residential lots previously approved for this area. The public parkland for the development was provided with Section 1. Public Comments: Public notice is not required for a preliminary plat application. There have been no public comments received at the time of this report. Recommended Motion: Approval of a Revised Preliminary Plat of 43.922 acres in the William Addison Survey, to be known as La Conterra, Sections 7 & 8. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The applicant has paid the required fees. SUBMITTED BY: Carla J. Benton ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Staff Report Cover Memo Report Exhibit 1 Backup Material Report Exhibit 2 Backup Material Georgetown Planning Department Staff Report La Conterra, Sec. 7&8, Revised Preliminary Plat Page 1 of 3 Report Date: December 3, 2014 File No: PP-2014-017 Project Planner: Carla Benton, Planner Item Details Project Name: Revised Preliminary Plat of La Conterra, Sections 7 & 8 Project Address: Naturita Drive and Ingnecia Drive Location: Northeast of La Conterra Boulevard (See Exhibit 1) Total Acreage: 43.922 acres Legal Description: 43.922 acres in the William Addison Survey Applicant: Geoff Guerrero, CBD, Inc. Property Owner: KB Home Lone Star, Inc. Contact: Geoff Guerrero, CBD, Inc. Proposed Lots: 177 residential lots, 4 open space lots Streets Proposed: 9,280 linear feet Parkland: Parkland requirements were met by dedication with Section 1 Heritage Trees: There are no Heritage Trees on this plat Existing Use: Undeveloped lot Existing Zoning: RS, Residential Single-family Growth Tier: Tier 1A Applicant’s Request The applicant proposes to revise the Preliminary Plat to develop 43.922 acres that constitutes the total remaining acreage from the original approved Preliminary Plat for La Conterra, as a residential subdivision with 177 residential lots, and 4 open space lots to allow for larger lots. This would be a reduction from the 200 residential lots previously approved for this area. The public parkland for the development was provided with Section 1. Site Information Location: The property is located on Naturita Drive and Ingnecia Drive. (see Exhibit 1) Physical Characteristics: The tract is undeveloped, with no Heritage Trees. History The original Preliminary Plat was approved by the City Council on October 10, 2006 with subsequent final plats approved and recorded. Annexation of this area was approved by City Council Planning Department Staff Report La Conterra, Sec. 7&8, Revised Preliminary Plat Page 2 of 3 Ordinance #2004-58. Rezoning to RS, Residential Single-family was approved by City Council Ordinance #2006-106. 2030 Plan Conformance The proposed Preliminary Plat is in conformance with the 2030 Plan land use designation of Moderate Density Residential, providing for a density ranging between 3.1 and 6 dwelling units per gross acre. The 2030 Plan Growth Tier Map designation is Tier 1A, that portion of the city where infrastructure systems are in place, or can be economically provided and where the bulk of the city’s growth should be guided over the near term. Utilities Water and wastewater are served by the City of Georgetown, with electric service provided by Oncor. It is anticipated that there is adequate capacity to serve this property either by existing capacity or developer participation in upgrades to infrastructure. Transportation The access to this project is provided via FM 1460. The future connectivity to the north, east and west is proposed by the extension of Ridge Line Boulevard from Maple Street. Future Application(s) The following applications will be required to be submitted: • Final Plat is to be processed administratively; • Construction Plans will be processed administratively Staff Analysis Staff Recommendation and Basis: Staff supports the Preliminary Plat as it meets the requirements of the City’s UDC and Comprehensive Plan. Special Consideration: None Interdepartmental, Governmental and Agency Comments None Public Comments Public notice is not required for a preliminary plat application. There have been no public comments received at the time of this report. Planning Department Staff Report La Conterra, Sec. 7&8, Revised Preliminary Plat Page 3 of 3 Proposed Meetings Schedule December 16, 2014 – Planning and Zoning Commission Attachments Exhibit 1 – Location Map Exhibit 2 – Preliminary Plat C I T Y O F G E O R G E T O W N C I T Y O F G E O R G E T O W N G e o r g e t o w n E T J G e o r g e t o w n E T J G e o r g e t o w n E T J G e o r g e t o w n E T J W R I D G E L I N E B L V D T O L T E C T R L C R E S T E D B U T T E W A Y N A T U R I T A D R I G N A C I A D R A V A L A N C H E A V E L A C O N T E R R A B L V D P O T T E R S P E AKWAY A N I M A S D R G R A N D E M E S A D R G R A N D J U N C T I O N T R L O L D P E A K R D G R E E N S L O P E L N Z E N I T H R D G R A N G E R R D P R E C I P I C E W A Y H I L L V U E R D M A P L E S T P L A N T E R S L N R E U N I O N L N W H I T E R I V E R D R A L A M O S A D R M I D N I G H T L N C U L E B R A D RTELLURIDE D R T O L T E C T R L H A W K E Y E P O I N T R D P I N N A C L E D R P I N N A C L E D R P L A T E A U T R L PP-2014-017 PP-2014-017 Exhibit #1 Co ordinate System : Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only 0 1,000 2,000Feet ¯ LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ S EInnerLoop SamHous t o n A v e ")1460 ")1460 Site City Lim its Street Site ³ City of Georgetown, Texas Planning and Zoning December 16, 2014 SUBJECT: Consideration and possible action on a Preliminary/Final Plat for 3.089 acres to be known as Pedernales Falls Drive and Rocky Hollow Creek Drive, located in northwest Sun City. Jordan J. Maddox, AICP, Principal Planner ITEM SUMMARY: This preliminary/final plat covers approximately 3 acres and includes 1 open space lot and right of way for two future collector roadways. The land within the plat is part of the existing Sun City development agreement area and its purpose is to connect the current terminus of Pedernales Falls Drive near Neighborhood 48 and 49 to the proposed new Rocky Hollow Creek Drive, which will provide access to CR 245 and future expansion phases. The new roadways will meet the standards of both the Sun City Development Agreement and the newly-adopted Planned Unit Development for Sun City Somerset. The eventual connection to CR 245 will provide much-needed access to Williams Drive from Sun City. No vertical development will occur on the land approved by this plat, only construction of the two roadways. Staff supports the preliminary plat based on the consistency with City regulations and the approved Sun City infrastructure standards. Recommendation Motion Approval of the Preliminary/Final Plat for Rocky Hollow Creek/Pedernales Falls. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None at this time. The applicant has paid the required fees. SUBMITTED BY: Jordan Maddox ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Location Map Backup Material Aerial Map Backup Material Plat Backup Material C I T Y O F G E O R G E T O W N G e o r g e t o w n E T J PEDERNALES FALLS D R COFFEEMILL C R E E K R D SALADO CREEK LN MARTINCREEKLN M E DIN A C R E E K C V TBD 60 COPPERASCREEK CV ALAMOSA CREEKLN KINGSCREEKRD S A L ADO CREEKLN E R I D G E W O O D R D KICKAPOO CREEK LN PFP-201 4-006 PFP-2014-006Exhibit #1 Co ordinate System : Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only 0 500 1,000Feet ¯ LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ 245 R o n al d W R e a g a n B l v d ")2338 ")2338 ")2338 Site City Lim its Street Site ³ PFP-2014-006 COFFEE MILL CREEK RD SALADO CREEK LN M E DIN A C R EE K C V ALAMOSA CREEK LN TBD 60 MARTIN CREEK LN KICKAPOO CREEK LN KINGS CREEK RD HOBBY ST PEDERNALES FALLS DR E R I D G E W O O D R D LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ Co ordinate System : Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only ¯ 0 500 1,000Feet Exhibit #4 PFP-2014-006 R o n a l d W R e a g a n B l v d ")245 ")2338 ")2338 Site City Lim its Street Site ³ R=25.00' A=39.72' C=35.67' 1 ( 6 : 130 . 0 8 ' 1 : 1 3 7 . 8 0 ' R=25.00' A=38.89' C=35.09' 1 : R=1160.00' A=458.17' C=455.19' 6 ( R=1240.00' A=314.09' C=313.25' 1 : R=25.00' A=38.13' C=34.54' 1 : 1 : 97.97' 1 ( 18 9 . 0 8 ' 6 ( 185.34'1 ( 291.68' 73 . 0 1 ' 11 6 . 0 7 ' 210.97' 80.71' 70 69 68 67 66 65 64 62 61 60 59 58 57 56 55 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 R=1240.00' A=66.84' C=66.83' 1 : KI C K A P O O C R E E K L A N E MAR T I N C R E E K L A N E P E D E R N A L E S F A L L S D R I V E FINAL P L A T O F PLANN E D U N I T D E V E L O P M E N T OF SU N C I T Y T E X A S NEIGH B O R H O O D F O R T Y - N I N E DOC. # 2 0 1 4 0 5 8 9 2 5 SUN CITY TEXAS NEIGHBORHOOD FO R T Y - E I G H T DOC. #2014020573 WILLIA M D . T U R P I N , J R , AND W I F E KARE N E . T U R P I N (CALL E D 5 . 0 8 A C R E S ) DOC. # 2 0 0 0 0 4 7 5 2 8 SOMERSE T H I L L S L T D (CALLED 1 0 1 2 . 5 2 7 A C R E S ) DOC. #20 0 4 0 9 8 8 8 0 P E D E R N A L E S F A L L S D R I V E ROCKY HOLLOW DRIVE 10' PUE APPROXIMATE LOCATION 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN & STREAM BUFFER LOT "A" OPEN SPACE & D.E. 1.07 AC. 46,772 S.F. BM #14 6 : 12.36' 6 ( 97.02' R=459.50' A=332.63' C=325.42' 1 ( R=25.00' A=37.92' C=34.39' 1 ( 1 ( 12.85' 80.0 0 ' 73 . 0 0 ' R=532.50' A=385.48' C=377.12' 6 : E X I S T . 1 0 ' P . U . E . EXIST. 10' P.U.E. E X I S T . 1 0 ' P . U . E . 1 ( 435.92' LOT "B" OPEN SPACE & D.E. PROPO S E D OPEN S P A C E & D . E . PROPOS E D N H 6 4 ROCKY H O L L O W C R E E K DRIVE EX T E N S I O N 6 ( 1 3 5 . 4 8 ' CREEK Y=10,239,337.58 X= 3,105,505.93 Y=10,239,293.41 X= 3,105,044.77 Y=10,239,108.40 X= 3,105,005.72 Y=10,238,782.69 X= 3,105,823.37 GEORGETOWN, TX 78626 STEGERBIZZELL.COM >>ENGINEERS >>PLANNERS >>SURVEYORS 512.930.9412 SERVICES METRO ADDRESS 1978 S. AUSTIN AVENUE WEB FOR REVIEW. THIS DOCUMENT IS RELEASED FOR THE PURPOSE OF REVIEW UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF BRYAN E. MOORE, P.E. REG. #98920 ON 11/20/14. IT IS NOT TO BE USED FOR BIDDING, PERMIT OR CONSTRUCTION. DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:APPROVED BY: LOCATION MAP - NOT TO SCALE JOB No. 22226 DATE: OCT., 2014 SHEET 1 of 2 Th e s e d r a w i n g s a r e t h e s o l e p r o p e r t y o f S T E G E R B I Z Z E L L . T h e u s e o f t h e s e d r a w i n g s i s h e r e b y r e s t r i c t e d t o t h e o r i g i n a l s i t e f o r w h i c h t h e y w e r e p r e p a r e d . R e p r o d u c t i o n o r r e u s e o f t h e s e d r a w i n g s i n w h o l e o r i n p a r t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n p e r m i s s i o n o f S T E G E R B I Z Z E L L i s s t r i c t l y p r o h i b i t e d . TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-181 TBPLS FIRM No.10003700 SITE 0 100 200 SCALE: 1"=100' ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS, PLANNERS 10000 Metric Blvd, Suite 200 Austin, TX 78758 512.916.0224 www.mckimcreed.com GENERAL NOTES: 1. Total Acres: 3.089 Ac. 2. Number of Lots: 1 3. Number of Blocks: 1 4. Linear feet of new street: 1,171 L.F. 5. Water, wastewater and electric service provider is the City of Georgetown. 6. All structures/ obstructions are prohibited in drainage easements 7. dŚĞƌĞĂƌĞĂƌĞĂƐǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞďŽƵŶĚĂƌŝĞƐŽĨƚŚŝƐƐƵďĚŝǀŝƐŝŽŶŝŶƚŚĞϭϬϬͲǇĞĂƌŇŽŽĚƉůĂŝŶĂƐĚĞĮŶĞĚďǇ&/ZDDĂƉEƵŵďĞƌϰϴϰϵϭϬϮϳϱ͕ effective date of Sept. 26, 2008. 8. WƌŝŽƌƚŽĂŶǇĐŚĂŶŶĞůĂůƚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶŽƌďƌŝĚŐĞĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͕ǁŚŝĐŚǁŝůůĐŚĂŶŐĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐŇŽŽĚƉĂƚƚĞƌŶƐŽƌĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶƐ͕Ă>ĞƚƚĞƌŽĨDĂƉ Amendment must be submitted to the Williamson County Floodplain Administrator for approval and approval by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. 9. Sidewalks will be provided on both sides (or 8 Foot wide sidewalks on one side) for arterial and other spine roads. No sidewalks are required for collector or residential streets. 10. This tract is located in the Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone. An approved Water Pollution Abatement Plan is required by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality prior to construction. 11. All bearings and coordinates are referenced to the Texas Coordinate System, Central Zone. NAD 83/93 HARN horizontal control datum and NAVD 88 vertical control datum. All coordinates are grid. All distances are surface and may be converted to grid by multiplying by the combined scale factor of 0.999856056. Coordinates are based on Lower Colorado River Authority USGS Benchmark C-1036. Published NAD 83 X=3,133,774.1200, Y=10,218,746.7610, NAVD 88 Elevation = 726.52; Adjusted to NAD 83/93 HARN X=3,133,772.6300, Y= 10,216,744.9310 Elevation = 723.87 12. The landowner assumes all risks associated with improvements located in the right-of-way, or road widening easements. By placing anything in the right-of-way or road widening easements, the landowner indemnifies and holds the City of Georgetown, Williamson County, their officers, agents and employees harmless from any liability owing to property defects or negligence not attributable to them and acknowledges that the improvements may be removed by the City and/or County and that the owner of the improvements will be responsible for the relocation and/or replacement of the improvements. 13. The building of all streets, roads, and other public thoroughfares and any bridges or culverts necessary to be constructed or placed is the responsibility of the owners of the tract of land covered by this plat in accordance with the plans and specifications prescribed by the City of Georgetown and/or Williamson County, Texas. Neither the City of Georgetown nor Williamson County assumes any obligation to build any of the streets, roads, or other public thoroughfares shown on this plat or of constructing any of the bridges or drainage improvements in connection therewith. Neither the City of Georgetown nor Williamson County assume any responsibility for drainage ways or easements in the subdivision, other than those draining or protecting the road system and streets in their respective jurisdictions. 14. Neither the City of Georgetown nor Williamson County assumes any responsibility for the accuracy of representations by other parties in this plat. Floodplain data, in particular, may change depending on subsequent development. It is further understood that the owners of the tract of land covered by this plat must install at their own expense all traffic control devices and signage that may be required before the streets in the subdivision have finally been accepted for maintenance by the City and / or County. 15. Right-of-way easements for widening roadways or improving drainage shall be maintained by the landowner until road or drainage improvements are actually constructed on the property. The City and/or County have the right at any time to take possession of any road widening easement for construction, improvement, or maintenance of the adjacent road. 16. No construction in the subdivision may begin until the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality TCEQ has approved the Water Pollution Abatement Plan (WPAP) in writing. 17. All open space lots and landscape easements within the boundaries of this plat will be maintained by the developer or after title transfer the Homeowners Association, purchaser or non-profit cooperation. 18. Control monuments as shown: It is the practice of McKim & Creed to monument all corners (If practical) upon completion of construction. Typical monument is a 1/2-Inch iron rod with a "MCKCRD" Plastic Cap. 19. All plat boundary corners are staked with 1/2 -Inch iron rods with plastic caps stamped "MCKCRD" unless otherwise indicated. 20. This tract is subject to the City of Georgetown Edward Aquifer Recharge Zone Water Quality (Salamander) Ordinance No. 2013-59 and any amendments thereto. FINAL PLAT OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OF SUN CITY TEXAS PEDERNALES FALLS DRIVE & ROCKY HOLLOW CREEK DRIVE BEING A SUBDIVISION OF 3.089 ACRES IN THE FREDERICK FOY SURVEY, ABSTRACT No.229 WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS OWNER: DEL WEBB TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP BY: DEL WEBB SOUTHWEST CO. BRENT BAKER, PRESIDENT LAND, CENTRAL TEXAS DIVISION 1501 SUN CITY BOULEVARD GEORGETOWN, TEXAS 78633 ENGINEER: STEGER BIZZELL 1978 S. AUSTIN AVE. GEORGETOWN, TEXAS 78626 SURVEYOR: McKIM & CREED, INC. 10000 METRIC BLVD., SUITE 200 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78758 BENCHMARKS: No. 14 COTTON SPINDLE SET IN 8" LIVE OAK ELEV. =870.153 Y=10,238,997.31 X= 3,105,217.44 LEGEND - Conc. Monument Found - Iron Pin Found - Iron Pin Set P.U.E. Public Utility Easement B.L. Building Line DE Indicates Drainage Easement. WLE Indicates Waterline Easement. WWE Indicates Wastewater Easement. BL Indicates Building Setback Line. PUE Indicates Public Utility Easement. ELEC E Indicates Electric Easement OAE Indicates Owner's Association Easement O.R.W.C.T. Indicates Official Records of Williamson County. W.C.P.R. Indicates Williamson County Plat Records P.O.B. Indicates Point of Beginning P: \ 2 2 0 0 0 - 2 2 9 9 9 \ 2 2 2 2 6 S u n C i t y \ D r a w i n g s \ P l a t s \ F i n a l P l a t P e d e r n a l e s F a l l s & R o c k y H o l l o w D r i v e . d w g , P l a t , 1 1 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 4 8 : 3 6 : 1 2 A M , D W G T o P D F . p c 3 , P l o t S t a m p 1 , P l o t S t a m p 1 PFP-2014-006 GEORGETOWN, TX 78626 STEGERBIZZELL.COM >>ENGINEERS >>PLANNERS >>SURVEYORS 512.930.9412 SERVICES METRO ADDRESS 1978 S. AUSTIN AVENUE WEB DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:APPROVED BY: Th e s e d r a w i n g s a r e t h e s o l e p r o p e r t y o f S T E G E R B I Z Z E L L . T h e u s e o f t h e s e d r a w i n g s i s h e r e b y r e s t r i c t e d t o t h e o r i g i n a l s i t e f o r w h i c h t h e y w e r e p r e p a r e d . R e p r o d u c t i o n o r r e u s e o f t h e s e d r a w i n g s i n w h o l e o r i n p a r t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n p e r m i s s i o n o f S T E G E R B I Z Z E L L i s s t r i c t l y p r o h i b i t e d . TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-181 TBPLS FIRM No.10003700 ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS, PLANNERS 10000 Metric Blvd, Suite 200 Austin, TX 78758 512.916.0224 www.mckimcreed.com JOB No. 22226 DATE: OCT., 2014 SHEET 2 of 2 STATE OF TEXAS { KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON { That Del Webb Texas Limited Partnership, an Arizona Limited Partnership ("Del Webb"), owner of the certain ƚƌĂĐƚŽĨůĂŶĚƐŚŽǁŶŚĞƌĞŽŶĂŶĚĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚŝŶĂĚĞĞĚƌĞĐŽƌĚĞĚŝŶŽĐ͘ηͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺŽĨƚŚĞKĨĮĐŝĂů Records of Williamson County, Texas, do hereby resubdivide said tract as shown hereon, and do hereby consent to all plat note requirements shown hereon, and do hereby dedicate to the City of Georgetown the streets, alleys, rights-of-way, easements and public places shown hereon for such public purposes as the City of Georgetown may deem appropriate. This subdivision is to be known as FINAL PLAT PEDERNALES FALLS DRIVE & ROCKY HOLLOW DRIVE. TO CERTIFY WHICH, WITNESS by my hand this ________ day of ______________________ , 2014 . ___________________________ Del Webb Texas Limited Partnership By: Del Webb Southwest Co. Brent Baker, President Land, Central Texas Division 1501 Sun City Boulevard Georgetown, Texas 78633 STATE OF TEXAS { KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON { Before me, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared Brent Baker, President Land, Central Texas Division of the Del Webb Southwest Co., an Arizona Corporation, General Partner Del Webb Texas Limited Partnership, an Arizona Limited Partnership , known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed, in the capacity therein stated. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL of office this_________ day of _________________________ , 2014 . ___________________________________________ Notary Public in and for the State of Texas My Commission expires on: _________________ I, Bryan E. Moore , Registered Professional Engineer in the State of Texas, do hereby certify that this subdivision ŝƐŝŶƚŚĞĚǁĂƌĚƐƋƵŝĨĞƌZĞĐŚĂƌŐĞŽŶĞĂŶĚŝƐĞŶĐƌŽĂĐŚĞĚďǇĂŽŶĞŇŽŽĚĂƌĞĂ͕ĂƐĚĞŶŽƚĞĚŚĞƌĞŝŶ͕ĂŶĚĂƐ ĚĞĮŶĞĚďǇ&ĞĚĞƌĂůŵĞƌŐĞŶĐǇDĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƚŝŽŶ&ůŽŽĚ,ĂǌĂƌĚŽƵŶĚĂƌǇDĂƉ͕ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚǇWĂŶĞů Number 48491C0275E, effective date September 26, 2008, and that each lot conforms to the City of Georgetown regulations.The fully developed, concentrated stormwater runoff resulting from the one hundred (100) year frequency storm is contained within the drainage easements shown and/or public rights-of-way dedicated by this plat. TO CERTIFY WHICH, WITNESS my hand and seal at Georgetown , Williamson County , Texas, this _____ day of_________________ , 2014. __________________________________ Bryan E. Moore Registered Professional Engineer No. 98920 State of Texas /͕ŶĚƌĞǁ^ƉƵƌŐŝŶ͕WůĂŶŶŝŶŐŝƌĞĐƚŽƌŽĨƚŚĞŝƚǇŽĨ'ĞŽƌŐĞƚŽǁŶ͕ĚŽŚĞƌĞďǇĐĞƌƚŝĨǇƚŚŝƐƉůĂƚŝƐĂƉƉƌŽǀĞĚĨŽƌĮůŝŶŐŽĨ record with the County Clerk of Williamson County, Texas. ______________________________ _______________________ Andrew Spurgin, Planning Director Date ĂƐĞĚƵƉŽŶƚŚĞƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶƐŽĨƚŚĞĞŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŽƌƐƵƌǀĞǇŽƌǁŚŽƐĞƐĞĂůŝƐĂĨĮǆĞĚŚĞƌĞƚŽ͕ĂŶĚĂĨƚĞƌƌĞǀŝĞǁ ŽĨƚŚĞƉůĂƚĂƐƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĞĚďǇƚŚĞƐĂŝĚĞŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŽƌƐƵƌǀĞǇŽƌ͕/ĮŶĚƚŚĂƚƚŚŝƐƉůĂƚĐŽŵƉůŝĞƐǁŝƚŚƚŚĞtŝůůŝĂŵƐŽŶ ŽƵŶƚǇ&ůŽŽĚƉůĂŝŶZĞŐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ͘dŚŝƐĐĞƌƚŝĮĐĂƚŝŽŶŝƐŵĂĚĞƐŽůĞůǇƵƉŽŶƐƵĐŚƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶƐĂŶĚƐŚŽƵůĚŶŽƚďĞ ƌĞůŝĞĚƵƉŽŶĨŽƌǀĞƌŝĮĐĂƚŝŽŶƐŽĨƚŚĞĨĂĐƚƐĂůůĞŐĞĚ͘tŝůůŝĂŵƐŽŶŽƵŶƚǇĚŝƐĐůĂŝŵƐĂŶǇƌĞƐƉŽŶƐŝďŝůŝƚǇƚŽĂŶǇŵĞŵďĞƌ ŽĨƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐĨŽƌŝŶĚĞƉĞŶĚĞŶƚǀĞƌŝĮĐĂƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶƐ͕ĨĂĐƚƵĂůŽƌŽƚŚĞƌǁŝƐĞ͕ĐŽŶƚĂŝŶĞĚŝŶƚŚŝƐƉůĂƚĂŶĚ the documents associated within it. ______________________________ ______________________________ Joe M. England, P.E. Date Williamson County Floodplain Administrator ĂƐĞĚƵƉŽŶƚŚĞĂďŽǀĞƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶƐŽĨƚŚĞĞŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŽƌƐƵƌǀĞǇŽƌǁŚŽƐĞƐĞĂůŝƐĂĨĮǆĞĚŚĞƌĞƚŽ͕ĂŶĚĂĨƚĞƌĂ ƌĞǀŝĞǁŽĨƚŚĞƐƵƌǀĞǇĂƐƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĞĚďǇƚŚĞƐĂŝĚĞŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŽƌƐƵƌǀĞǇŽƌ͕/ĮŶĚƚŚĂƚƚŚŝƐďůƵĞůŝŶĞ;ƐƵƌǀĞǇͿĐŽŵƉůŝĞƐ with the requirements of Edwards Aquifer Regulations for Williamson County and Williamson County On-Site ^ĞǁĂŐĞ&ĂĐŝůŝƚǇZĞŐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ͘dŚŝƐĐĞƌƚŝĮĐĂƚŝŽŶŝƐŵĂĚĞƐŽůĞůǇƵƉŽŶƐƵĐŚƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶƐĂŶĚƐŚŽƵůĚŶŽƚďĞ ƌĞůŝĞĚƵƉŽŶĨŽƌǀĞƌŝĮĐĂƚŝŽŶƐŽĨƚŚĞĨĂĐƚƐĂůůĞŐĞĚ͘dŚĞtŝůůŝĂŵƐŽŶŽƵŶƚǇĂŶĚŝƚŝĞƐ,ĞĂůƚŚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ;t,Ϳ ĂŶĚtŝůůŝĂŵƐŽŶŽƵŶƚǇĚŝƐĐůĂŝŵĂŶǇƌĞƐƉŽŶƐŝďŝůŝƚǇƚŽĂŶǇŵĞŵďĞƌŽĨƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐĨŽƌŝŶĚĞƉĞŶĚĞŶƚǀĞƌŝĮĐĂƚŝŽŶŽĨ the representations, factual or otherwise, contained in this blue line (survey) and the documents associated with it. ______________________________ _______________________ Deborah L. Marlow, RS OS0029596 Date Assistant Deputy Director Environmental Health Services, WCCHD STATE OF TEXAS { KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON { I, Nancy Rister, Clerk of the County Court of said County, do hereby certify that the foregoing ŝŶƐƚƌƵŵĞŶƚŝŶǁƌŝƚŝŶŐ͕ǁŝƚŚŝƚƐĐĞƌƚŝĮĐĂƚĞǁĂƐĮůĞĚĨŽƌƌĞĐŽƌĚŝŶŵǇŽĨĨŝĐĞŽŶƚŚĞͺͺͺͺͺĚĂǇŽĨͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ϮϬͺͺ͕ ͕͘͘ĂƚͺͺͺͺͺŽ͛ĐůŽĐŬ͕ͺͺ͘ŵ͘ĂŶĚĚƵůǇƌĞĐŽƌĚĞĚŽŶƚŚĞͺͺͺͺͺĚĂǇŽĨͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ϮϬͺͺͺ͕͕͘͘ĂƚͺͺͺŽ͛ĐůŽĐŬ͕ ___.m. in the Plat Records of said County in Document No._______________________________. TO CERTIFY WHICH, WITNESS my hand and seal at the County Court of said County, at my office in Georgetown, Texas the date last shown above written. Nancy Rister, Clerk County Court of Williamson County, Texas By:_______________________Deputy This subdivision known as FINAL PLAT PEDERNALES FALLS DRIVE & ROCKY HOLLOW DRIVE, has been approved for filing for record according to the minutes of the meeting of the Georgetown Planning and Zoning Commission on the _____day of ________________, 2014. A.D. __________________________________ ____________________ John Horne, Chairman Date Planning and Zoning Commission City of Georgetown __________________________________ _____________________ Bob Brent, Secretary Date FINAL PLAT OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OF SUN CITY TEXAS PEDERNALES FALLS DRIVE & ROCKY HOLLOW CREEK DRIVE BEING A SUBDIVISION OF 3.089 ACRES IN THE FREDERICK FOY SURVEY, ABSTRACT No.229 WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS METES AND BOUNDS OF 3.089 ACRES OF FINAL PLAT OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OF SUN CITY TEXAS, PEDERNALES FALLS DRIVE & ROCK HOLLOW DRIVE OUT OF THE FREDERICK FOY SURVEY, ABSTRACT, NUMBER 229 WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS Being 3.089 acres of land situated in the Frederick Foy Survey, A-229 of Williamson County, Texas and being a remainder portion of a called 279.999 acre tract conveyed to DEL WEBB TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, By Document Number Recorded in 1997019426, of the Official Public Records of Williamson County, Texas (O.P.R.W.C.T.). Said 3.089 acre tract being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows with all bearings being referenced to the Texas State Plane Coordinate System, Texas Central Zone, NAD 83/93 HARN Datum. Coordinates shown hereon are grid and all distances were converted to surface by multiplying by the combined factor of 1.000143965. '/EE/E'ĂƚĂϯͬϰͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚĨŽƵŶĚŝŶĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞ;yсϯ͕ϭϬϰ͕ϱϱϳ͘ϯϵ͕͕zсϭ͕Ϭϯϳ͕ϲϯϮ͘ϳϮͿĂƚƚŚĞŶŽƌƚŚǁĞƐƚ ĐŽƌŶĞƌŽĨƉůĂƚƚĞĚ>Žƚ͟͞KWE^WΘZ/E'^DEd>KdK&&/E>W>dhE/ds>KWDEd OF SUN CITY GEORGETOWN NEIGHBORHOOD FORTY-NINE, as recorded in Document Number 2014058925, of the (O.P.R.W.C.T), same being the southwesterly corner of a the remainder of called 279.999 acre tract conveyed to Del Webb LTD, by Document Number 1997019426 of the (O.P.R.W.C.T), being a point for the current southwest terminus of said Rocky Hollow Drive (73.00 Right-of-Way) of said NEIGHBORHOOD FOUTY-NINE, same being the southeast terminus of proposed Rocky Hollow Drive (73.00 Right-of-Way) of a proposed extension of said Rocky Hollow Drive (73.00 Right-of-Way) of proposed NEIGHBORHOOD SIXTY-FOUR, also being a point in a south-easterly line of said remainder of a called 1,013.527 tract conveyed to SOMERSET HILLS LTD., from which a 1/2-inch iron rod with no cap found for the northeast corner of a called 5.08 acre tract conveyed to William D. Turpin Jr. and wife, <ĂƌĞŶ͘dƵƌƉŝŶďǇŽĐƵŵĞŶƚEƵŵďĞƌϮϬϬϬϬϰϳϱϮϴ;K͘Z͘t͘͘d͘Ϳ͕ĞĂƌƐ͗^ŽƵƚŚϭϭΣϱϱΖϬϴΗtĞƐƚ͕ĂĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞ of 34.36 feet; THENCE, along the said proposed terminus of said Rocky Hollow Drive, the west common line of said Ϯϳϵ͘ϵϵϵĂĐƌĞƚƌĂĐƚĂŶĚƚŚĞƌĞŵĂŝŶĚĞƌŽĨƐĂŝĚϭ͕Ϭϭϯ͘ϱϮϳĂĐƌĞƚƌĂĐƚ͕EŽƌƚŚϭϭΣϱϱΖϬϴΗĂƐƚ͕ĂĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨ ϳϯ͘ϬϭĨĞĞƚƚŽĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚĐĂƉ^ƚĂŵƉĞĚ͞D</DΘZ/E͘͟ĐĂƉƐĞƚĨŽƌƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚ Northwest terminus of said Rocky Hollow Drive, and corner hereof, of said proposed terminus of proposed extension of said Rocky Hollow Drive (73.00 Right-of-Way) and northeast corner of said proposed NEIGHBORHOOD SIXTY-FOUR; THENCE, along, the west common line of said 279.999 acre tract and the easterly line of remainder of ƐĂŝĚϭ͕Ϭϭϯ͘ϱϮϳĂĐƌĞƚƌĂĐƚ͕EŽƌƚŚϭϭΣϱϱΖϬϴΗĂƐƚ͕ĂĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨϭϭϲ͘ϬϳĨĞĞƚƚŽĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚĐĂƉ ^ƚĂŵƉĞĚ͞^hZsKE/E͘͟ĨŽƵŶĚŝŶƚŚĞĐĞŶƚĞƌůŝŶĞŽĨŽǁĂŶƌĞĞŬĨŽƌĂŶĂŶŐůĞƉŽŝŶƚĨŽƌƚŚĞĐŽŵŵŽŶ corner of said 279.999 acre tract and the remainder of said 1,013.527 acre tract; THENCE, along the common northerly line of said 279.999 acre tract and a southerly line of the remainder of said 1,013.527 acre tract, the following two (2) courses: 1.^ŽƵƚŚϳϴΣϬϲΖϬϭΗĂƐƚ͕ĂĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨϭϴϱ͘ϯϰĨĞĞƚƚŽĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚĐĂƉ^ƚĂŵƉĞĚ͞^hZsKE /E͘͟ĨŽƵŶĚŝŶƚŚĞĐĞŶƚĞƌůŝŶĞŽĨŽǁĂŶƌĞĞŬĨŽƌĂŶĂŶŐůĞƉŽŝŶƚŚĞƌĞŽĨ͖ 2.EŽƌƚŚϳϯΣϯϱΖϯϯΗĂƐƚ͕ƉĂƐƐŝŶŐĂƚĂĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨϮϭϬ͘ϵϳĨĞĞƚĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚ͞D</DΘ Z/E͘͟ĐĂƉƐĞƚĨŽƌƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚEŽƌƚŚǁĞƐƚƚĞƌŵŝŶƵƐŽĨWĞĚĞƌŶĂůĞƐ&ĂůůƐŝŶƚŚĞĐĞŶƚĞƌůŝŶĞŽĨŽǁĂŶ Creek, then an additional 80.71 feet, in all a total distance of 291.68 feet ,to a 3/4- inch iron rod with ͞D</DΘZ/E͘͟ĐĂƉĨŽƵŶĚŝŶĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞĨŽƌƚŚĞŶŽƌƚŚǁĞƐƚĐŽƌŶĞƌŽĨƉůĂƚƚĞĚ>Žƚ͟͞KWE^WΘ DRAINAGE EASEMENT LOT OF FINAL PLAT UNIT DEVELOPMENT OF SUN CITY GEORGETOWN NEIGHBORHOOD FORTY-EIGHT, as recorded in Document Number 2014020573, of the (O.P.R.W.C.T), and proposed curving Northeast terminus of said Falls Drive, from which a1/2-inch iron rod with cap ^ƚĂŵƉĞĚ͞^hZsKE/E͘͟ĨŽƵŶĚŝŶƚŚĞĐĞŶƚĞƌůŝŶĞŽĨŽǁĂŶƌĞĞŬĞĂƌƐ͗EŽƌƚŚϳϯΣϯϱΖϯϯΗĂƐƚ͕ϰϯϱ͘ϵϬ feet; THENCE, departing said common line and along the common easterly remainder line of said 279.999 acre ƚƌĂĐƚĂŶĚƚŚĞĞĂƐƚƌŝŐŚƚͲŽĨͲǁĂǇůŝŶĞŽĨƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƐĂŝĚ&ĂůůƐƌŝǀĞ͕ƚŚĞǁĞƐƚůŝŶĞŽĨƐĂŝĚƉůĂƚƚĞĚ>Žƚ͟͞ OPEN SPACE & DRAINAGE EASEMENT LOT OF FINAL PLAT UNIT DEVELOPMENT OF SUN CITY GEORGETOWN NEIGHBORHOOD FORTY-EIGHT, the following three (3) courses: 1. 458.18 feet along the arc of said curve being to the left having a Radius of 1160.00 feet, with a ĚĞůƚĂĂŶŐůĞŽĨϮϮΣϯϳΖϰϭΗ͕ǁŝƚŚĂĐŚŽƌĚďĞĂƌŝŶŐŽĨ^ŽƵƚŚϯϲΣϬϳΖϭϲΗĂƐƚ͕ǁŝƚŚĂĐŚŽƌĚůĞŶŐƚŚŽĨϰϱϱ͘ϮϭĨĞĞƚ ƚŽĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚĐĂƉ^ƚĂŵƉĞĚ͞D</DΘZ/E͘͟ĨŽƵŶĚĨŽƌĂƉŽŝŶƚŽĨƚĂŶŐĞŶĐǇ͖ 2.^ŽƵƚŚϰϳΣϮϱΖϮϱΗĂƐƚ͕ĂĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨϭϯϱ͘ϰϴĨĞĞƚƚŽĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚĐĂƉ^ƚĂŵƉĞĚ͞D</DΘ Z/E͟ĨŽƵŶĚĨŽƌĂƉŽŝŶƚŽĨĐƵƌǀĞƌĞƚƵƌŶƚŽƚŚĞůĞĨƚ͕ŽĨƐĂŝĚ&ĂůůƐƌŝǀĞĂŶĚDĂƌƚŝŶƌĞĞŬ>ĂŶĞ͖ 3. 39.72 feet along the arc of said curve to the left having a Radius of 25.00 feet, with a delta angle of ϵϭΣϬϭΖϮϰΗ͕ǁŝƚŚĂĐŚŽƌĚďĞĂƌŝŶŐŽĨEŽƌƚŚϴϳΣϬϯΖϱϱΗĂƐƚ͕ǁŝƚŚĂĐŚŽƌĚůĞŶŐƚŚŽĨϯϱ͘ϲϳĨĞĞƚƚŽĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚ ŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚĐĂƉ^ƚĂŵƉĞĚ͞D</DΘZ/E͘͟ĐĂƉĨŽƵŶĚĨŽƌĂƉŽŝŶƚŽĨĐƵƌǀĞƌĞƚƵƌŶŽĨƐĂŝĚDĂƌƚŝŶ Creek Lane; being the most north-easterly corner of said FINAL PLAT UNIT DEVELOPMENT OF SUN CITY GEORGETOWN NEIGHBORHOOD FORTY-NINE; d,E͕^ŽƵƚŚϰϭΣϯϮΖϰϴΗtĞƐƚ͕ĂĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨϭϯϬ͘ϬϴĨĞĞƚ͕ĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞŶŽƌƚŚƚĞƌŵŝŶƵƐůŝŶĞŽĨƐĂŝĚ&ĂůůƐ Drive, of said FINAL PLAT UNIT DEVELOPMENT OF SUN CITY GEORGETOWN NEIGHBORHOOD &KZdzͲE/E͕ƚŽĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚĐĂƉ^ƚĂŵƉĞĚ͞D</DΘZ/E͘͟ĐĂƉĨŽƵŶĚĨŽƌĂƉŽŝŶƚŽĨ curve return of said Martin Creek Lane; d,E͕ĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞǁĞƐƚĞƌůǇƌŝŐŚƚͲŽĨͲǁĂǇůŝŶĞŽĨƐĂŝĚ&ĂůůƐƌŝǀĞ͕ĂŶĚĐŽŵŵŽŶůŝŶĞ͕ŽĨ>Žƚ͟͟KƉĞŶ^ƉĂĐĞ and Drainage Easement Lot of said FINAL PLAT UNIT DEVELOPMENT OF SUN CITY GEORGETOWN NEIGHBORHOOD FORTY-NINE, four (4) courses: 1. 38.89 feet along the arc of said curve to the left having a Radius of 25.00 feet, with a delta angle of ϴϵΣϬϴΖϬϴΗ͕ǁŝƚŚĂĐŚŽƌĚďĞĂƌŝŶŐŽĨEŽƌƚŚϬϯΣϬϯΖϭϬΗtĞƐƚ͕ǁŝƚŚĂĐŚŽƌĚůĞŶŐƚŚŽĨϯϱ͘ϬϵĨĞĞƚƚŽĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚ ŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚĐĂƉ^ƚĂŵƉĞĚ͞D</DΘZ/E͘͟ĐĂƉĨŽƵŶĚĨŽƌĂƉŽŝŶƚŽĨƚĂŶŐĞŶĐǇ͖ 2.EŽƌƚŚϰϳΣϮϱΖϮϱΗtĞƐƚ͕ĂĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨϭϯϳ͘ϴϬĨĞĞƚ͕ƚŽĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚĐĂƉ^ƚĂŵƉĞĚ͞D</D ΘZ/E͘͟ĐĂƉĨŽƵŶĚĨŽƌĂƉŽŝŶƚŽĨĐƵƌǀĞƚŚĞƌŝŐŚƚ͖ 3. 314.09 feet along the arc of said curve to the right having a Radius of 1240.00 feet, with a delta ĂŶŐůĞŽĨϭϰΣϯϬΖϰϲΗ͕ǁŝƚŚĂĐŚŽƌĚďĞĂƌŝŶŐŽĨEŽƌƚŚϰϬΣϭϬΖϬϮΗtĞƐƚ͕ǁŝƚŚĂĐŚŽƌĚůĞŶŐƚŚŽĨϯϭϯ͘ϮϱĨĞĞƚƚŽĂ ϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚĐĂƉ^ƚĂŵƉĞĚ͞D</DΘZ/E͘͟ĐĂƉĨŽƵŶĚĨŽƌĂƉŽŝŶƚŽĨĐƵƌǀĞƌĞƚƵƌŶŽĨƐĂŝĚ Falls Drive and Rocky Hollow Drive, being a curve to the left; 4. 38.13 feet along the arc of said curve to the left having a Radius of 25.00 feet, with a delta angle of ϴϳΣϮϰΖϬϰΗ͕ǁŝƚŚĂĐŚŽƌĚďĞĂƌŝŶŐŽĨEŽƌƚŚϳϲΣϯϲΖϮϵΗtĞƐƚ͕ǁŝƚŚĂĐŚŽƌĚůĞŶŐƚŚŽĨϯϱ͘ϱϰĨĞĞƚƚŽĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚ ŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚĐĂƉ^ƚĂŵƉĞĚ͞D</DΘZ/E͘͟ĐĂƉĨŽƵŶĚĨŽƌĂƉŽŝŶƚŽĨĐƵƌǀĞƌĞƚƵƌŶŽĨƐĂŝĚ&ĂůůƐ Drive and Rocky Hollow Drive; d,E͕ĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞƐŽƵƚŚĞƌůǇƌŝŐŚƚͲŽĨͲǁĂǇůŝŶĞŽĨƐĂŝĚZŽĐŬǇ,ŽůůŽǁƌŝǀĞ͕ĂŶĚĐŽŵŵŽŶůŝŶĞ͕ŽĨ>Žƚ͟͟ Open Space and Drainage Easement Lot of said FINAL PLAT UNIT DEVELOPMENT OF SUN CITY GEORGETOWN NEIGHBORHOOD FORTY-NINE, three (3) courses: 1.^ŽƵƚŚϱϵΣϰϭΖϰϬΗtĞƐƚ͕ĂĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨϭϮ͘ϯϲĨĞĞƚ͕ƚŽĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚĐĂƉ^ƚĂŵƉĞĚ͞D</DΘ Z/E͘͟ĐĂƉĨŽƵŶĚĨŽƌĂƉŽŝŶƚŽĨĐƵƌǀĞƚŚĞƌŝŐŚƚ͖ 2. 385.48 feet along the arc of said curve to the right having a Radius of 532.50 feet, with a delta ĂŶŐůĞŽĨϰϭΣϮϴΖϯϲΗ͕ǁŝƚŚĂĐŚŽƌĚďĞĂƌŝŶŐŽĨ^ŽƵƚŚϴϬΣϮϱΖϱϴΗtĞƐƚ͕ǁŝƚŚĂĐŚŽƌĚůĞŶŐƚŚŽĨϯϳϳ͘ϭϮĨĞĞƚƚŽĂ ϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚĐĂƉ^ƚĂŵƉĞĚ͞D</DΘZ/E͘͟ĐĂƉĨŽƵŶĚĨŽƌĂƉŽŝŶƚŽĨƚĂŶŐĞŶĐǇ͖ 3.EŽƌƚŚϳϴΣϰϵΖϰϰΗtĞƐƚ͕ĂĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨϵϳ͘ϵϳĨĞĞƚ͕ƚŽƚŚĞWK/EdK&'/EE/E'ĐŽŶƚĂŝŶŝŶŐĂ computed area of 3.089 acres of land, more or less. ________________________________ Date: Darrell D. White Registered Professional Land Surveyor Texas Registration Number 4816 Prepared by: Mckim&Creed 10000 Metric Blvd., Suite 200, Austin, Texas 78758 TBPLS Firm Registration number 101776-01 FOR REVIEW. THIS DOCUMENT IS RELEASED FOR THE PURPOSE OF REVIEW UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF BRYAN E. MOORE, P.E. REG. #98920 ON 11/20/14. IT IS NOT TO BE USED FOR BIDDING, PERMIT OR CONSTRUCTION. DARRELL D. WHITE 4816 S T A T E O F T E X A S L A N D S U R V E Y O R P: \ 2 2 0 0 0 - 2 2 9 9 9 \ 2 2 2 2 6 S u n C i t y \ D r a w i n g s \ P l a t s \ F i n a l P l a t P e d e r n a l e s F a l l s & R o c k y H o l l o w D r i v e . d w g , D e d i c a t i o n , 1 1 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 4 8 : 3 6 : 3 9 A M , D W G T o P D F . p c 3 , P l o t S t a m p 1 , P l o t S t a m p 1 PFP-2014-006 City of Georgetown, Texas Planning and Zoning December 16, 2014 SUBJECT: Consideration and possible action on a Preliminary Plat for 37.47 acres to be known as Sun City Neighborhood 64, located between CR 245 and Pedernales Falls Drive. PP-2014-019 Jordan J. Maddox, AICP, Principal Planner ITEM SUMMARY: This preliminary plat follows a recently-approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning approval that provides for the extension of the Sun City development. The proposed Neighborhood 64 (continuing the numerical naming standard from existing Sun City) will create 111 single-family residential lots and include the proposed Rocky Hollow Creek Drive, which will connect CR 245 to Pedernales Falls in the current Sun City territory. Staff supports the preliminary plat based on the consistency with the applicable regulations and conformance with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. Recommended Motion: Approval of the Preliminary Plat for Sun City Neighborhood 64. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None at this time. The applicant has paid the required fees. SUBMITTED BY: Jordan Maddox ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Location Map Backup Material Aerial Map Backup Material Staff Report Backup Material Plat Backup Material C I T Y O F G E O R G E T O W N G e o r g e t o w n E T J G e o r g e t o w n E T J G e o r g e t o w n E T J G R A Y S T O N E L N CR 245 R M 2338 A S T O N C V OAKLAND RD T I M B E R L I N E R D SHE R Y L A N N C V A R R O W H E A D R D R I D G E W O O D C V E RID G E W OOD RD K I C K A P O O C R E E K L N PP-2014-019 PP-2014-019 Exhibit #1 Co ordinate System : Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only 0 1,000 2,000Feet ¯ LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ 245 ")2338 ")2338 Site City Lim its Street Site ³ R o n a l d W R e a g a n B l v d PP-2014-019 R M 2338 G R A Y S T O N E L N E RIDGEWOOD RD CR 245 A S T O N C V S H E R Y L A N N C V T I M B E R L I N E R D K I C K A P O O C R E E K L N OAKLAND RD A R R O W H E A D R D R I D G E W O O D C V LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ Co ordinate System : Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only ¯ 0 1,000 2,000Feet Exhibit #4 PP-2014-019 R o n a l d W R e a g a n B l v d ")2338 ")2338 ")2338 Site City Lim its Street Site ³ Georgetown Department Staff Report Planning and Zoning Commission Sun City Neighborhood 64 Preliminary Plat Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: December 10, 2014 File No: PP-2014-019 Project Planner: Jordan J. Maddox, AICP, Principal Planner Staff Recommended Motion Approval of the Preliminary Plat for Sun City Neighborhood 64. Item Description Consideration and possible action on a Preliminary Plat for 37.47 acres to be known as Sun City Neighborhood 64. Item Details Project Name: Sun City Neighborhood 64 Location: CR 245 Total Acreage: 37.47 acres Legal Description: 37.47 acres in the Frederick Foy and Lewis Dyches Surveys Applicant: Bryan Moore, PE, Steger and Bizzell Property Owner: Somerset Hills LTD (soon to be Pulte Homes (Brent Baker)) Existing Use: Vacant Existing Zoning: Planned Unit Development (PUD) Future Land Use: Low Density Residential Growth Tier: Tier 1B Overview of Applicant’s Request This preliminary plat follows a recently-approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning approval that provides for the extension of the Sun City development. The proposed Neighborhood 64 (continuing the numerical naming standard from existing Sun City) will create 111 single-family residential lots and include the proposed Rocky Hollow Creek Drive, which will connect CR 245 to Pedernales Falls in the current Sun City territory. Site Information The 37-acre site is within the land area formerly known as Somerset Hills/Northern Lands and takes immediate access from CR 245. It is surrounded by floodplain in Rocky Hollow Creek and Planning Department Staff Report Sun City Neighborhood 64 Preliminary Plat Page 2 of 2 the low-density Ridgewood subdivision to the south. There are over 30 Heritage Trees on site, most of which will be preserved during development. Property History The property was annexed and zoned in October of 2014. The development falls under the current UDC regulations and the development plan of the PUD. The property is also entitled under the Somerset Hills Development Agreement, approved in 2005 and covering primarily utilities and infrastructure. Infrastructure Wastewater, water and electric will be served by the City of Georgetown. The applicant is currently addressing the utilities for the site and there are no anticipated issues regarding capacity or improvements, per the approved utility agreements. Special Consideration: A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for the entire PUD area (approximately 1200 acres) has been submitted and is presently in the review process. The scope of this TIA is quite large and the study is being analyzed to ensure that the impact is fully understood and will be appropriately mitigated. Staff and the applicant have discussed the preliminary results of the TIA with the City’s traffic consultant and staff is comfortable bringing forward the Neighborhood 64 plat specifically for approval at P&Z with a conditional analysis. The impact of Neighborhood 64 itself is minimal and would otherwise not reach the threshold for a traffic study through the typical City process. The preliminary results of the TIA show that since significant infrastructure will be completed with the subdivision, the impact of Neighborhood 64 has immediate benefits. A fully completed TIA must be completed prior to recordation of the plat and will detail any specified improvements to be made both on-site and off-site. While not available as of the writing of this report, staff anticipates that the consultant’s analysis will be prepared by the scheduled Commission meeting time. Future Application(s) A Final Plat and Construction Plans will need to be approved prior to building permits. Staff Analysis Staff supports the preliminary plat based on the consistency with the applicable regulations and conformance with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. Attachments Exhibit A – Location Map Exhibit B – Plat GEORGETOWN, TX 78626 STEGERBIZZELL.COM >>ENGINEERS >>PLANNERS >>SURVEYORS 512.930.9412 SERVICES METRO ADDRESS 1978 S. AUSTIN AVENUE WEB DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:APPROVED BY: Th e s e d r a w i n g s a r e t h e s o l e p r o p e r t y o f S T E G E R B I Z Z E L L . T h e u s e o f t h e s e d r a w i n g s i s h e r e b y r e s t r i c t e d t o t h e o r i g i n a l s i t e f o r w h i c h t h e y w e r e p r e p a r e d . R e p r o d u c t i o n o r r e u s e o f t h e s e d r a w i n g s i n w h o l e o r i n p a r t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n p e r m i s s i o n o f S T E G E R B I Z Z E L L i s s t r i c t l y p r o h i b i t e d . TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-181 TBPLS FIRM No.10003700 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUN CITY NEIGHBORHOOD SIXTY-FOUR BEING A SUBDIVISION OF 37.46 ACRES IN THE FREDERICK FOY SURVEY, ABSTRACT No.229 AND LEWIS P. DYCHES SURVEY, ABSTRACT No.171 WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS 15 ' B . L . ( C O R N E R ) BUILDING SETBACK TYPICAL LOT 10' PUE 20' BL 10 ' P U E 6' B . L . SITE 0 300 600 SCALE: 1"=300' OWNER: SOMERSET HILLS, LTD. 2500 N. BUFFALO DRIVE, SUITE 150 LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89128 ENGINEER: STEGER BIZZELL 1978 S. AUSTIN AVE. GEORGETOWN, TEXAS 78626 SURVEYOR: McKIM & CREED, INC. 10000 METRIC BLVD., SUITE 200 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78758 ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS, PLANNERS 10000 Metric Blvd, Suite 200 Austin, TX 78758 512.916.0224 www.mckimcreed.com 20' B.L. 6' B . L . 6' B . L . BENCHMARKS: No. 2 COTTON SPINDLE SET IN 10" ELM. ELEV.=869.65 No. 3 COTTON SPINDLE SET IN 12" ELM. ELEV.=871.87 No. 4 COTTON SPINDLE SET IN 9" ELM. ELEV.=877.11 No. 5 COTTON SPINDLE SET IN 9" LIVE OAK. ELEV.=892.81 No. 7 COTTON SPINDLE SET IN 9" ELM. ELEV. =901.71 No. 9 COTTON SPINDLE SET IN 4" ELM. ELEV. =901.03 No.10 COTTON SPINDLE SET IN 14" ELM. ELEV. =892.05 No. 11 COTTON SPINDLE SET IN 13" ELM. ELEV. =897.88 No. 13 COTTON SPINDLE SET IN 10" ELM. ELEV. =881.27 111 LOTS 5 OPEN SPACE LOTS 3 BLOCKS L.F. SQ.FT. ACRE DESCRIPTION / USE 7,423 585,627 13.44 STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY 734,235 16.86 RESIDENTIAL LOTS NH 64 BLOCK A-C 61,799 1.41 OPEN SPACE LOT "A" 138,587 3.18 OPEN SPACE LOT "B" 111,587 2.56 OPEN SPACE LOT "C" 622 0.01 OPEN SPACE LOT "D" 536 0.01 OPEN SPACE LOT "E" PROPOSED ACREAGE AND USAGE JOB No. 22226 DATE: AUGUST, 2014 SHEET 1 of 8 FOR REVIEW. THIS DOCUMENT IS RELEASED FOR THE PURPOSE OF REVIEW UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF BRYAN E. MOORE, P.E. REG. #98920 ON 12/9/14. IT IS NOT TO BE USED FOR BIDDING, PERMIT OR CONSTRUCTION. LEGEND: Iron Pin Found Iron Pin Set DE Indicates Drainage Easement. WLE Indicates Waterline Easement. WWE Indicates Wastewater Easement. BL Indicates Building Setback Line. PUE Indicates Public Utility Easement. ELEC E Indicates Electric Easement OAE Indicates Owner's Association Easement O.R.W.C.T. Indicates Official Records of Williamson County. W.C.P.R. Indicates Williamson County Plat Records P.O.B. Indicates Point of Beginning Exhibit B PP-2014-019 34.36' L1 L3 10' PUE 6' B L 10' PUE 10' PUE 10' PUE 20' BL 20' BL 2 0 ' B L 1 0 ' P U E 6' B L 6' B L 6' B L 6' B L 6' BL 6' BL 6' B L 6' B L 6' B L 6' B L 20' BL 20' BL 20' BL 1 0 ' B L 6 ' B L 20' B L 6' B L 6' B L 205.01' 36 . 8 0 ' 6' B L 6' B L 10' PUE 10' PUE 20' B L 6 ' B L 6' B L WILLIAM D. TURPIN, JR. AND WIFE, KAREN E. TURPIN (CALLED 5.08 AC.) DOC.No.2000047528REGGIE D. HIGDON AND JACQUELINE D. HIGDON (CALLED 5.143 AC.) DOC.No.2010021573 BENT OAKS ESTATES; CABINET P, SLIDES 370-371, DEL WEBB LTD., (REMAINDER OF 279.999 ACRES) DOC. No.1997019426 634.646 ACRES A PORTION OF S0MERSET HILLS LTD. REMAINDER OF (CALLED 1013.527 ACRES) DOCUMENT No.2004098880 73 . 0 1 ' 50 . 0 0 ' BM #2 BM #3 BM #4 BM #5 BM #7 BM #13 BM #14 15' BL RO C K Y H O L L O W C R E E K D R I V E LOT "B" OPEN SPACE & D.E. 3.18 AC. 138,587 S.F. LOT "A" OPEN SPACE & D.E. 1.41 AC. 61,799 S.F. 50 . 0 0 ' 10' P U E 10' P U E 20' BL 20' BL 15' BL20' BL 2 0 ' B L 20' BL 73. 0 0 ' 70. 0 0 ' C O W A N C R E E K CO W A N C R E E K LIMI T S O F F E M A FLO O D P L A I N (SEE N O T E 8 ) & ST R E A M B U F F E R LOT "B" OPEN SPACE & D.E. 3.18 AC. 135,587 S.F. APPR O X I M A T E L O C A T I O N 100- Y E A R C I T Y O F G E O R G E T O W N REG U L A T O R Y F L O O D W A Y & ST R E A M B U F F E R C1 C 2 C3 C11 1 : 6 ( 6 : 10 7 . 3 7 ' 6 : 201.04' 6 : 19.60' 6 : 119.46'6 : 161.37' 6 : 203.72' 6 : 6 : 6 : 6 : 6 : L2 7045 7081 7082 7083 7084 7086 7041 7042 7046 7085 C80 C79 6425 Sq. Ft. 1 7708 Sq. Ft. 2 9148 Sq. Ft. 3 7981 Sq. Ft. 4 7083 Sq. Ft. 5 6414 Sq. Ft. 6 5831 Sq. Ft. 7 5884 Sq. Ft. 8 5939 Sq. Ft. 9 5924 Sq. Ft. 127992 Sq. Ft. 13 5912 Sq. Ft. 14 5707 Sq. Ft. 155704 Sq. Ft. 16 5706 Sq. Ft. 17 5709 Sq. Ft. 188160 Sq. Ft. 20 5713 Sq. Ft. 21 5715 Sq. Ft. 22 5717 Sq. Ft. 23 5720 Sq. Ft. 24 5722 Sq. Ft. 25 7231 Sq. Ft. 1 7356 Sq. Ft. 2 7252 Sq. Ft. 35600 Sq. Ft. 4 5600 Sq. Ft. 5 5600 Sq. Ft. 6 6452 Sq. Ft. 7 6137 Sq. Ft. 8 6679 Sq. Ft. 9 6756 Sq. Ft. 10 6435 Sq. Ft. 11 6406 Sq. Ft. 12 6406 Sq. Ft. 13 6406 Sq. Ft. 14 6406 Sq. Ft. 15 6406 Sq. Ft. 166354 Sq. Ft. 17 6106 Sq. Ft. 18 5375 Sq. Ft. 19 5375 Sq. Ft. 20 7869 Sq. Ft. 2 7677 Sq. Ft. 3 7810 Sq. Ft. 4 8115 Sq. Ft. 56329 Sq. Ft. 76329 Sq. Ft. 8 6324 Sq. Ft. 10 6329 Sq. Ft. 11 6329 Sq. Ft. 12 6301 Sq. Ft. 24 6301 Sq. Ft. 25 6301 Sq. Ft. 26 6300 Sq. Ft. 27 6300 Sq. Ft. 28 6300 Sq. Ft. 29 8374 Sq. Ft. 31 C5 6 ( 61. 1 3 ' 1 : 1 : C6 67 . 6 8 ' C7 33 . 7 6 ' 39.29' 1 : C8 65.76' 1 : C9 61.39' 1 : 17.07' C10 53.55' 1 : C4 C12 1 : 1 ( 36.18' 6 ( 6.26' C13 1 : 1 ( 35.83' C144.58' 1 : 6 : 1 ( 1 : 43.00' 43.00' 1 : 43.00' 43.00' 43.00' 43.00' 52 . 0 0 ' 57 . 1 2 ' 21.13' 1 : 43.00' 10.99' 32.03' 1 : 43.00' 43.02' 1 : 43.00' 43.02' 1 : 43.00' 43.03' 1 : 13 4 . 9 3 ' 58.77' 58.81' 1 : 44.10' 44.14' 1 : 43.00' 15.01' 28.00' 1 : 13 2 . 6 7 ' 43.00' 43.00' 1 : 43.00' 43.00' 1 : 43.00' 43.00' 1 : 43.00' 43.00' 5712 Sq. Ft. 191 : 61.43' 49.27' 12.16' 1 : 43.00' 43.00' 1 : 43.00' 43.00' 1 : 43.00' 43.00' 1 : 43.00' 43.00' 43.00' 43.00' C15 37 . 0 0 ' 1 ( 125.00' 110.00' C17 1 ( 128.47' 4.33' C16 C18 1 ( 140.86' 6 ( 39.85'60 . 9 8 ' C19 1 ( 131.0 0 ' 6 0 . 7 0 ' C20 1 ( 130. 0 0 ' 5 9 . 1 2 ' C21 1 ( 130 . 0 0 ' 6 ( 5 9 . 0 3 ' C22 1 ( 130 . 0 0 ' 6 ( 5 9 . 0 3 ' 6 ( C23 1 ( 13 0 . 0 0 ' 6 ( 59 . 0 3 ' C24 1 ( 13 0 . 0 0 ' 6 ( 59. 0 3 ' 1 ( 59.03 ' C25 1 : 13 0 . 0 0 ' C26 1 : 12 8 . 2 3 ' 1 ( 58.93' C27 5.70' 1 : 1 ( 56.60' 1 : 43.00' 6 ( 43.00' 43.00' 43.00' 6334 Sq. Ft. 9 1 ( C49 6 ( 41 . 3 3 ' C47 117.42' 57 . 7 3 ' C48 C501 ( L 8 1 ( C51 C52 L9 1 ( 1 : C53 34.21'43.25' 1 : 45.00' 45.00'45.00' 1 : 45.00'45.00' 1 : 45.00'45.00' 1 : 45.00' 1 : 45.00' 45.00'45.00' 45.00' 44.80'44.80'44.80' 44.80' 6 ( 14 0 . 6 5 ' 44.80' 6 ( 14 0 . 6 4 ' 6 ( 14 0 . 6 4 ' 44.80' 6 ( 14 0 . 6 3 ' 44.80' 44.80'44.80'44.80'44.80' 44.80' 6 ( 14 0 . 6 3 ' 6 ( 14 0 . 6 2 ' 44.80' 1 : 14 0 . 6 2 ' 11.54' 65.75' 6300 Sq. Ft. 30 44.80' 62.48' 5990 Sq. Ft. 11 42.74' 1 : 13 8 . 5 4 ' 43.00' 0.28' 6569 Sq. Ft. 6 C54 1 : 39.09' 6 : 1 : 6 ( 70437044 1 ( 11 6 . 0 7 ' LOT "B" OPEN SPACE & DE NEIGHBORHOOD FORTY-NINE DOC. No.2014058925 DEL WEBB LTD., (REMAINDER OF 279.999 ACRES) DOC. No.1997019426 6 : 249.27' 6 : 293.46' 6 ( 5994 Sq. Ft. 10 43.00' 43.02' 1 : 14 0 . 0 5 ' 6 : 298.51' 7689 Sq. Ft. 1 36.21' 6 ( 41 . 3 3 ' C84 C85 L4 L6 50 . 0 0 ' 50.00' LOT "D" OPEN SPACE & D.E. 0.01 AC. 622 S.F. Y=10,239,293.41 X= 3,105,044.77 GEORGETOWN, TX 78626 STEGERBIZZELL.COM >>ENGINEERS >>PLANNERS >>SURVEYORS 512.930.9412 SERVICES METRO ADDRESS 1978 S. AUSTIN AVENUE WEB DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:APPROVED BY: Th e s e d r a w i n g s a r e t h e s o l e p r o p e r t y o f S T E G E R B I Z Z E L L . T h e u s e o f t h e s e d r a w i n g s i s h e r e b y r e s t r i c t e d t o t h e o r i g i n a l s i t e f o r w h i c h t h e y w e r e p r e p a r e d . R e p r o d u c t i o n o r r e u s e o f t h e s e d r a w i n g s i n w h o l e o r i n p a r t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n p e r m i s s i o n o f S T E G E R B I Z Z E L L i s s t r i c t l y p r o h i b i t e d . TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-181 TBPLS FIRM No.10003700 JOB No. 22226 DATE: AUGUST, 2014 SHEET 2 of 8 SCALE: 1"=100' ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS, PLANNERS 10000 Metric Blvd, Suite 200 Austin, TX 78758 512.916.0224 www.mckimcreed.com 0 100 200 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUN CITY NEIGHBORHOOD SIXTY-FOUR BEING A SUBDIVISION OF 37.46 ACRES IN THE FREDERICK FOY SURVEY, ABSTRACT No.229 AND LEWIS P. DYCHES SURVEY, ABSTRACT No.171 WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS Exhibit B PP-2014-019 GEORGETOWN, TX 78626 STEGERBIZZELL.COM >>ENGINEERS >>PLANNERS >>SURVEYORS 512.930.9412 SERVICES METRO ADDRESS 1978 S. AUSTIN AVENUE WEB DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:APPROVED BY: Th e s e d r a w i n g s a r e t h e s o l e p r o p e r t y o f S T E G E R B I Z Z E L L . T h e u s e o f t h e s e d r a w i n g s i s h e r e b y r e s t r i c t e d t o t h e o r i g i n a l s i t e f o r w h i c h t h e y w e r e p r e p a r e d . R e p r o d u c t i o n o r r e u s e o f t h e s e d r a w i n g s i n w h o l e o r i n p a r t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n p e r m i s s i o n o f S T E G E R B I Z Z E L L i s s t r i c t l y p r o h i b i t e d . TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-181 TBPLS FIRM No.10003700 SCALE: 1"=100' ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS, PLANNERS 10000 Metric Blvd, Suite 200 Austin, TX 78758 512.916.0224 www.mckimcreed.com JOB No. 22226 DATE: AUGUST, 2014 SHEET 3 of 8 0 100 200 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUN CITY NEIGHBORHOOD SIXTY-FOUR BEING A SUBDIVISION OF 37.46 ACRES IN THE FREDERICK FOY SURVEY, ABSTRACT No.229 AND LEWIS P. DYCHES SURVEY, ABSTRACT No.171 WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS Exhibit B PP-2014-019 APPR O X I M A T E L O C A T I O N 100-Y E A R C I T Y O F G E O R G E T O W N REGU L A T O R Y F L O O D W A Y & STR E A M B U F F E R 198.89' 9.21' 4 3 . 3 6 ' 6' B L 6' B L RIDGEWOOD ESTATES SECTION TWO CABINET M, SLIDES 343 REMAINDER OF (CALLED 1,013.527 ACRES) SOMERSET HILLS, LTD DOC. NO. 2004098880 O.P.R.W.C.T.15 16 BM #9 BM #10 BM #11 ROCKY H O L L O W C R E E K D R I V E ROCKY HOLLOW CREEK DRIVE LOT " B " OPEN S P A C E & D . E . 3.18 A C . 135,5 8 7 S . F . 10' P U E 7 3 . 0 0 ' 2 0 ' B L 70.0 0 ' 7 3 . 0 0 ' ROC K Y H O L L O W C R E E K ROCKY H O L L O W C R E E K APPR O X I M A T E L O C A T I O N 100-Y E A R C I T Y O F G E O R G E T O W N REGU L A T O R Y F L O O D W A Y & STR E A M B U F F E R 6 : 193.31' 1 : 2 4 8 . 6 7 ' C59 1 : L5 6 ( C69 C71 7050 7051 7052 7056 7057 7077 7076 7055 7080 7053 7054 7067 7078 7079 1 ( 6 : C77 C41 6 : 86.33' 6 ( 16 5 . 8 9 ' 1 : 10.15' C67 1 : 7 5 . 0 9 ' C68 6 : 6 : C70 6 : 724 . 8 3 ' 1 : 6 ( 1 ( 57.79' C73 Sq. Ft. 6722 Sq. Ft. 37 7288 Sq. Ft. 38 8395 Sq. Ft. 39 9525 Sq. Ft. 40 10423 Sq. Ft. 41 6539 Sq. Ft. 42 6186 Sq. Ft. 43 11417 Sq. Ft. 35 7818 Sq. Ft. 36 5590 Sq. Ft. 37 1 : 43.00'C60 6.34' 57.70' 1 : C61 44.84' 17.51' 1 : C62 67.98' 1 ( C63 4 3 . 3 4 ' 1 ( 1 ( C64 8 9 . 3 3 ' C65 6 0 . 2 8 ' 1 ( C66 5 5 . 7 2 ' 1 ( 15.17' 59 . 0 3 ' 1 : 59 . 0 3 ' 58 . 9 2 ' 59 . 4 1 ' C42 53 . 8 0 ' 6 ( C43 1 ( 27.71' C44 5.66' 1 ( 42.51' 4 3 . 0 0 ' 1 ( 130. 0 0 ' 6 ( 4 3 . 0 0 ' 1 ( 70.22' C45 C46 LOT "C" OPEN SPACE & D.E. 2.56 AC. 111,587 S.F. 7058 7059 7060 7061 FR E D E R I C K F O Y S U R V E Y A B S T R A C T N o . 2 2 9 LE W I S P . D Y C H E S S U R V E Y A B S T R A C T N o . 1 7 1 FR E D E R I C K F O Y S U R V E Y A B S T R A C T N o . 2 2 9 LE W I S P . D Y C H E S S U R V E Y A B S T R A C T N o . 1 7 1 COU N T Y R O A D N o . 2 4 5 DOC . # 9 5 5 3 3 9 2 Chi s h o l m T r a i l S p e c i a l U t i l i t y D i s t r i c t E a s e m e n t b y i n s t r u m e n t d a t e d July 1 6 , 1 9 9 2 , a n d r e c o r d e d i n V o l u m e 2 1 6 8 , P a g e 4 4 , O f f i c i a l Rec o r d s , W i l l i a m s o n C o u n t y , T e x a s . 6 : 315.54' C78 C75 C76 C74 C72 6 : 169 7 . 1 9 ' 20' BL 31.16' C86 C87 L7 L10 50 . 0 0 ' 73.0 0 ' 73.0 0 ' FUT U R E C O U N T Y R O A D N o . 2 4 5 R . O . W . LOT "E" OPEN SPACE & D.E. 0.01 AC. 536 S.F. Y=10,237,675.70 X= 3,101,413.16 Y=10,239,272.22 X= 3,102,096.13 GEORGETOWN, TX 78626 STEGERBIZZELL.COM >>ENGINEERS >>PLANNERS >>SURVEYORS 512.930.9412 SERVICES METRO ADDRESS 1978 S. AUSTIN AVENUE WEB DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:APPROVED BY: Th e s e d r a w i n g s a r e t h e s o l e p r o p e r t y o f S T E G E R B I Z Z E L L . T h e u s e o f t h e s e d r a w i n g s i s h e r e b y r e s t r i c t e d t o t h e o r i g i n a l s i t e f o r w h i c h t h e y w e r e p r e p a r e d . R e p r o d u c t i o n o r r e u s e o f t h e s e d r a w i n g s i n w h o l e o r i n p a r t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n p e r m i s s i o n o f S T E G E R B I Z Z E L L i s s t r i c t l y p r o h i b i t e d . TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-181 TBPLS FIRM No.10003700 SCALE: 1"=100' ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS, PLANNERS 10000 Metric Blvd, Suite 200 Austin, TX 78758 512.916.0224 www.mckimcreed.com JOB No. 22226 DATE: AUGUST, 2014 SHEET 4 of 8 0 100 200 505.52' ^ϮϭΣϰϰΖϰϰΗ PRELIMINARY PLAT SUN CITY NEIGHBORHOOD SIXTY-FOUR BEING A SUBDIVISION OF 37.46 ACRES IN THE FREDERICK FOY SURVEY, ABSTRACT No.229 AND LEWIS P. DYCHES SURVEY, ABSTRACT No.171 WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS Exhibit B PP-2014-019 Curve Table Curve # C68 C69 C70 C71 C72 C73 C74 C75 C76 C77 C78 C79 C80 C81 C82 C83 C84 C85 C86 C87 DELTA Radius 25.00' 486.50' 486.50' 486.50' 413.50' 25.00' 25.00' 1660.00' 2060.00' 688.50' 761.50' 1368.00' 1295.00' 225.00' 225.00' 275.00' 7.50' 7.50' 7.50' 7.50' TANGENT 22.22' 36.42' 375.79' 437.51' 371.85' 24.57' 24.73' 239.94' 212.74' 47.25' 52.26' 867.09' 820.84' 42.85' 1.76' 0.30' INFINITY' INFINITY' INFINITY' INFINITY' ARC 36.33' 72.70' 639.95' 712.65' 605.71' 38.83' 39.00' 476.58' 423.97' 94.35' 104.35' 1545.64' 1463.20' 84.69' 3.53' 0.60' 23.56' 23.56' 23.56' 23.56' CHORD 33.22' 72.63' 594.80' 650.62' 552.99' 35.05' 35.17' 474.94' 423.22' 94.27' 104.27' 1464.73' 1386.60' 84.19' 3.53' 0.60' 15.00' 15.00' 15.00' 15.00' CH BRG 6 ( 1 ( 1 ( 1 ( 1 ( 6 : 6 ( 1 ( 1 ( 6 : 6 : 6 : 6 : 6 ( 6 ( 6 ( 1 : 6 ( 6 : 1 ( Curve Table Curve # C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 C11 C12 C13 C14 C15 C16 C17 C18 C19 C20 DELTA Radius 25.00' 25.00' 275.00' 275.00' 275.00' 275.00' 275.00' 275.00' 275.00' 275.00' 225.00' 225.00' 225.00' 225.00' 15.00' 275.00' 275.00' 275.00' 275.00' 275.00' TANGENT 25.00' 24.97' 152.88' 27.14' 20.12' 20.12' 20.12' 20.12' 20.12' 12.08' 123.78' 36.72' 40.97' 36.55' 15.00' 275.00' 18.07' 20.10' 20.10' 20.10' ARC 39.27' 39.24' 279.05' 54.10' 40.17' 40.18' 40.18' 40.17' 40.16' 24.14' 226.32' 72.80' 81.05' 72.48' 23.56' 431.97' 36.08' 40.12' 40.12' 40.12' CHORD 35.36' 35.33' 267.24' 54.01' 40.13' 40.14' 40.14' 40.14' 40.13' 24.13' 216.90' 72.48' 80.62' 72.16' 21.21' 388.91' 36.05' 40.08' 40.08' 40.08' CH BRG 1 ( 6 ( 1 ( 1 ( 1 ( 1 ( 1 ( 1 ( 1 ( 1 ( 1 ( 6 : 6 : 6 : 1 : 1 : 1 : 1 : 1 : 1 : Curve Table Curve # C22 C23 C24 C25 C26 C27 C28 C29 C30 C31 C32 C33 C34 C35 C36 C37 C38 C39 C41 C42 DELTA Radius 275.00' 275.00' 275.00' 275.00' 275.00' 275.00' 275.00' 275.00' 275.00' 275.00' 275.00' 275.00' 275.00' 275.00' 275.00' 275.00' 275.00' 275.00' 225.00' 225.00' TANGENT 20.10' 20.10' 20.10' 20.10' 20.10' 17.43' 274.41' 15.01' 20.10' 20.10' 20.10' 20.10' 20.10' 20.10' 20.11' 20.11' 20.11' 20.12' 123.77' 22.71' ARC 40.12' 40.12' 40.12' 40.12' 40.12' 34.81' 431.37' 29.99' 40.12' 40.13' 40.13' 40.13' 40.14' 40.14' 40.14' 40.14' 40.14' 40.17' 226.31' 45.27' CHORD 40.08' 40.08' 40.08' 40.08' 40.08' 34.78' 388.49' 29.98' 40.09' 40.09' 40.09' 40.10' 40.10' 40.10' 40.10' 40.11' 40.11' 40.13' 216.89' 45.20' CH BRG 1 : 1 : 1 : 6 : 6 : 6 : 6 : 6 : 6 : 6 : 6 : 6 : 6 : 6 : 6 : 6 ( 6 ( 6 ( 6 ( 6 : Curve Table Curve # C43 C44 C45 C46 C47 C48 C49 C50 C51 C52 C53 C59 C60 C61 C62 C63 C64 C65 C66 C67 DELTA Radius 225.00' 225.00' 25.00' 25.00' 15.00' 225.01' 225.00' 225.00' 225.00' 225.00' 225.00' 275.00' 275.00' 275.00' 275.00' 275.00' 275.00' 275.00' 275.00' 250.00' TANGENT 56.45' 35.50' 25.00' 25.00' 15.00' 226.32' 1.40' 43.22' 42.82' 42.79' 42.99' 151.27' 17.12' 20.10' 20.10' 20.10' 27.16' 20.10' 13.90' 55.97' ARC 110.62' 70.41' 39.27' 39.27' 23.56' 354.75' 2.79' 85.41' 84.63' 84.57' 84.96' 276.60' 34.20' 40.12' 40.12' 40.12' 54.14' 40.12' 27.78' 110.12' CHORD 109.51' 70.12' 35.36' 35.36' 21.21' 319.13' 2.79' 84.89' 84.13' 84.08' 84.45' 265.09' 34.18' 40.08' 40.08' 40.08' 54.05' 40.08' 27.77' 109.23' CH BRG 1 : 1 : 6 ( 6 : 6 : 1 : 6 ( 6 ( 6 ( 6 ( 1 ( 6 ( 1 ( 1 ( 1 ( 6 ( 6 ( 6 ( 6 ( 1 : Line Table Line # L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 L7 L8 L9 L10 L11 L12 Length 3.85' 19.03' 7.38' 29.69' 34.75' 29.69' 24.00' 37.47' 36.80' 24.00' 36.84' 37.58' Direction 1 ( 1 ( 6 : 6 : 6 : 6 : 6 ( 1 : 1 : 6 ( 6 : 6 : GEORGETOWN, TX 78626 STEGERBIZZELL.COM >>ENGINEERS >>PLANNERS >>SURVEYORS 512.930.9412 SERVICES METRO ADDRESS 1978 S. AUSTIN AVENUE WEB DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:APPROVED BY: Th e s e d r a w i n g s a r e t h e s o l e p r o p e r t y o f S T E G E R B I Z Z E L L . T h e u s e o f t h e s e d r a w i n g s i s h e r e b y r e s t r i c t e d t o t h e o r i g i n a l s i t e f o r w h i c h t h e y w e r e p r e p a r e d . R e p r o d u c t i o n o r r e u s e o f t h e s e d r a w i n g s i n w h o l e o r i n p a r t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n p e r m i s s i o n o f S T E G E R B I Z Z E L L i s s t r i c t l y p r o h i b i t e d . TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-181 TBPLS FIRM No.10003700 ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS, PLANNERS 10000 Metric Blvd, Suite 200 Austin, TX 78758 512.916.0224 www.mckimcreed.com JOB No. 22226 DATE: AUGUST, 2014 SHEET 5 of 8 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUN CITY NEIGHBORHOOD SIXTY-FOUR BEING A SUBDIVISION OF 37.46 ACRES IN THE FREDERICK FOY SURVEY, ABSTRACT No.229 AND LEWIS P. DYCHES SURVEY, ABSTRACT No.171 WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS Exhibit B PP-2014-019 GENERAL NOTES: Total Acres: 37.46 Ac. Number of Lots: 111 Number of Blocks: 3 4. Linear feet of new street: 7,423 L.F. 5. Proposed use: Residential 6. Water, wastewater and electric service shall be provided by the City of Georgetown. 7. All structures/ obstructions are prohibited in drainage easements 8. dŚĞƌĞĂƌĞŶŽĂƌĞĂƐǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞďŽƵŶĚĂƌŝĞƐŽĨƚŚŝƐƐƵďĚŝǀŝƐŝŽŶŝŶƚŚĞϭϬϬͲǇĞĂƌŇŽŽĚƉůĂŝŶĂƐĚĞĮŶĞĚďǇ&/ZDDĂƉEƵŵďĞƌϰϴϰϵϭϬϮϳϱ͕ effective date of Sept. 26, 2008. 9. WƌŝŽƌƚŽĂŶǇĐŚĂŶŶĞůĂůƚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶŽƌďƌŝĚŐĞĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͕ǁŚŝĐŚǁŝůůĐŚĂŶŐĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐŇŽŽĚƉĂƚƚĞƌŶƐŽƌĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶƐ͕Ă>ĞƚƚĞƌŽĨDĂƉ Amendment must be submitted to the Williamson County Floodplain Administrator for approval and approval by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. 10. In order to promote drainage away from a structure, the slab elevation should be built at least one-foot above the surrounding ground, ĂŶĚƚŚĞŐƌŽƵŶĚƐŚŽƵůĚďĞŐƌĂĚĞĚĂǁĂǇĨƌŽŵƚŚĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĂƚĂƐůŽƉĞŽĨϭͬϮ͟ƉĞƌĨŽŽƚĨŽƌĂĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨĂƚůĞĂƐƚϭϬĨĞĞƚ͘ 11. Parkland Dedication requirements are being met by paying a fee-in-lieu of dedication. 12. Any Heritage Tree as noted on this plat is subject, in perpetuity, to the maintenance, care, pruning and removal requirements of the City of Georgetown, and approved removal does not require modification of the plat. 13. Sidewalks shall be provided, owned and maintained in accordance with the approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) District agreement. 14. This tract is located in the Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone. An approved Water Pollution Abatement Plan is required by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality prior to construction. 15. All bearings and coordinates are referenced to the Texas Coordinate System, Central Zone. NAD 83/93 HARN horizontal control datum and NAVD 88 vertical control datum. All coordinates are grid. All distances are surface and may be converted to grid by multiplying by the combined scale factor of 0.999856056. Coordinates are based on Lower Colorado River Authority USGS Benchmark C-1036. Published NAD 83 X=3,133,774.1200, Y=10,218,746.7610, NAVD 88 Elevation = 726.52; Adjusted to NAD 83/93 HARM X=3,133,772.6300, Y= 10,216,744.9310 Elevation = 723.87 16. The maximum impervious coverage is 65% for single family lots and 40% maximum in overall development. 17. The landowner assumes all risks associated with improvements located in the right-of-way, or road widening easements. By placing anything in the right-of-way or road widening easements, the landowner indemnifies and holds the City of Georgetown, Williamson County, their officers, agents and employees harmless from any liability owing to property defects or negligence not attributable to them and acknowledges that the improvements may be removed by the City and/or County and that the owner of the improvements will be responsible for the relocation and/or replacement of the improvements. 18. The building of all streets, roads, and other public thoroughfares and any bridges or culverts necessary to be constructed or placed is the responsibility of the owners of the tract of land covered by this plat in accordance with the plans and specifications prescribed by the City of Georgetown and/or Williamson County, Texas. Neither the City of Georgetown nor Williamson County assumes any obligation to build any of the streets, roads, or other public thoroughfares shown on this plat or of constructing any of the bridges or drainage improvements in connection therewith. Neither the City of Georgetown nor Williamson County assume any responsibility for drainage ways or easements in the subdivision, other than those draining or protecting the road system and streets in their respective jurisdictions. 19. Neither the City of Georgetown nor Williamson County assumes any responsibility for the accuracy of representations by other parties in this plat. Floodplain data, in particular, may change depending on subsequent development. It is further understood that the owners of the tract of land covered by this plat must install at their own expense all traffic control devices and signage that may be required before the streets in the subdivision have finally been accepted for maintenance by the City and / or County. 20. Right-of-way easements for widening roadways or improving drainage shall be maintained by the landowner until road or drainage improvements are actually constructed on the property. The City and/or County have the right at any time to take possession of any road widening easement for construction, improvement, or maintenance of the adjacent road. 21. No construction in the subdivision may begin until the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality TCEQ has approved the Water Pollution Abatement Plan (WPAP) in writing. 22. All open space lots ("A" thru "E") and landscape easements within the boundaries of this plat will be maintained by the developer or after title transfer the Homeowners Association, purchaser or non-profit cooperation. 23. Control monuments as shown: It is the practice of McKim & Creed to monument all corners (If practical) upon completion of construction. Typical monument is a 1/2-Inch iron rod with a "MCKCRD" Plastic Cap. 24. All plat boundary corners are staked with 1/2 -Inch iron rods with plastic caps stamped "MCKCRD" unless otherwise indicated. 25. 10' PUE shall be granted along north side of Rocky Hollow Creek Drive Right-Of-Way by future plat or separate instrument. 26. This tract is subject to the City of Georgetown Edward Aquifer Recharge Zone Water Quality (Salamander) Ordinance No. 2013-59 and any amendments thereto. 27. Water quality and drainage easements required for this preliminary plat shall be dedicated by separate instrument. 28. Sidewalk along the north side of Rocky Hollow Creek Drive shall placed outside the water quality easement. 29. Open space and drainage easement Lots D and E will be positioned to meet fire code or will require rollover curbs. 30. This subdivision is subject to the City of Georgetown Water Conservation ordinance, Adopted April 22, 2014, ad Ordinance 2014-023. GEORGETOWN, TX 78626 STEGERBIZZELL.COM >>ENGINEERS >>PLANNERS >>SURVEYORS 512.930.9412 SERVICES METRO ADDRESS 1978 S. AUSTIN AVENUE WEB DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:APPROVED BY: Th e s e d r a w i n g s a r e t h e s o l e p r o p e r t y o f S T E G E R B I Z Z E L L . T h e u s e o f t h e s e d r a w i n g s i s h e r e b y r e s t r i c t e d t o t h e o r i g i n a l s i t e f o r w h i c h t h e y w e r e p r e p a r e d . R e p r o d u c t i o n o r r e u s e o f t h e s e d r a w i n g s i n w h o l e o r i n p a r t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n p e r m i s s i o n o f S T E G E R B I Z Z E L L i s s t r i c t l y p r o h i b i t e d . TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-181 TBPLS FIRM No.10003700 ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS, PLANNERS 10000 Metric Blvd, Suite 200 Austin, TX 78758 512.916.0224 www.mckimcreed.com JOB No. 22226 DATE: AUGUST, 2014 SHEET 6 of 8 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUN CITY NEIGHBORHOOD SIXTY-FOUR BEING A SUBDIVISION OF 37.46 ACRES IN THE FREDERICK FOY SURVEY, ABSTRACT No.229 AND LEWIS P. DYCHES SURVEY, ABSTRACT No.171 WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS HERITAGE TREE SCHEDULE 7041 - 28" LIVE OAK 7042 - 29" LIVE OAK, MULTI 16",15",11" 7043 - 32" LIVE OAK, MULTI 16", 15", 11 7044 - 26" LIVE OAK, MULTI 20",13" 7045 - 28" LIVE OAK, MULTI 20",10",6" *7046 - 26" LIVE OAK* 7047 - 28" LIVE OAK, MULTI 17",12",10" 7048 - 26" LIVE OAK, MULTI 12",10",10",9" 7049 - 31" LIVE OAK, MULTI 15",12",10",10" 7050 - 28" LIVE OAK, MULTI 16",11",9",5" 7051 - 29" LIVE OAK, MULTI 20",18" 7052 - 30" LIVE OAK, MULTI 18",13",12" *7053 - 27" LIVE OAK, MULTI 14",14",12"* 7054 - 32" LIVE OAK, MULTI 23",18" 7055 - 38" LIVE OAK, MULTI 18",15",13,12" 7056 - 36" LIVE OAK 7057 - 44" LIVE OAK 7058 - 37" LIVE OAK 7059 - 34" LIVE OAK, MULTI 18",14",13",6 7060 - 45" LIVE OAK, MULTI 18",14",12",12",10",7" 7061 - 29" LIVE OAK 7067 - 26" LIVE OAK, MULTI 14",12",12" 7076 - 27" LIVE OAK 7077 - 33" LIVE OAK 7078 - 33" LIVE OAK *7079 - 26" LIVE OAK* 7080 - 28" LIVE OAK *7081 - 28" LIVE OAK, MULTI 22",13"* 7082 - 31" RED OAK 7083 - 32" LIVE OAK *7084 - 26" LIVE OAK* *7085 - 33" LIVE OAK, MULTI 18",16",14* 7086 - 27" LIVE OAK, MULTI 19",18" *7087 27" LIVE OAK MULTI 20-12* *TO BE REMOVED* Exhibit B PP-2014-019 GEORGETOWN, TX 78626 STEGERBIZZELL.COM >>ENGINEERS >>PLANNERS >>SURVEYORS 512.930.9412 SERVICES METRO ADDRESS 1978 S. AUSTIN AVENUE WEB DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:APPROVED BY: Th e s e d r a w i n g s a r e t h e s o l e p r o p e r t y o f S T E G E R B I Z Z E L L . T h e u s e o f t h e s e d r a w i n g s i s h e r e b y r e s t r i c t e d t o t h e o r i g i n a l s i t e f o r w h i c h t h e y w e r e p r e p a r e d . R e p r o d u c t i o n o r r e u s e o f t h e s e d r a w i n g s i n w h o l e o r i n p a r t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n p e r m i s s i o n o f S T E G E R B I Z Z E L L i s s t r i c t l y p r o h i b i t e d . TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-181 TBPLS FIRM No.10003700 JOB No. 22226 DATE: JULY, 2014 SHEET 7 of 8 ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS, PLANNERS 10000 Metric Blvd, Suite 200 Austin, TX 78758 512.916.0224 www.mckimcreed.com d,E͕ĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞĞĂƐƚDĂƌŐŝŶŽĨƐĂŝĚtŝůůŝĂŵƐŽŶŽƵŶƚǇZŽĂĚEƵŵďĞƌϮϰϱZŝŐŚƚͲŽĨͲtĂǇ͖EŽƌƚŚϮϭΣϰϰΖϰϭΗĂƐƚ͕Ă distance of 1697.19 feet, to a 1/2-inch iron rod with no cap found for an angle point hereof, being the southwest corner of called 31.32 acre tract conveyed to Donald H. Kylberge by Volume 752, Page 229 (W.C.D.R.); d,E͕ŐĞŶĞƌĂůůǇĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞĨĞŶĐĞĚĂŶĚŽĐĐƵƉŝĞĚůŝŶĞŽĨƐĂŝĚϯϭ͘ϯϮĂĐƌĞƚƌĂĐƚ͕EŽƌƚŚϲϵΣϯϴΖϯϲΗĂƐƚ͕ĂĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨϱϳ͘ϳϵ ĨĞĞƚ͕ƚŽĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚĐĂƉ^ƚĂŵƉĞĚ͞D</DΘZ/E͘͟ĐĂƉƐĞƚĨŽƌƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚĐƵƌǀŝŶŐĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂů Right-of Way of said Williamson County Road Number 245, said curve being to the right; THENCE, departing said 31.32 acre south line and over and across said 1,013.527 acre tract and along the proposed additional Right-of-Way line of said Williamson County Road Number 245, the following two (2) courses: 1. 423.97 feet along the arc of said curve to the right having a Radius of 2060.00 feet, with a delta angle of ϭϭΣϰϳΖϯϭΗ͕ǁŝƚŚĂĐŚŽƌĚďĞĂƌŝŶŐŽĨ^ŽƵƚŚϭϱΣϱϵΖϮϳΗtĞƐƚ͕ǁŝƚŚĂĐŚŽƌĚůĞŶŐƚŚŽĨϰϮϯ͘ϮϮĨĞĞƚƚŽĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚ ĐĂƉ^ƚĂŵƉĞĚ͞D</DΘZ/E͘͟ĐĂƉƐĞƚĨŽƌĂƉŽŝŶƚŽĨƚĂŶŐĞŶĐǇ͖ 2.^ŽƵƚŚϮϭΣϱϯΖϯϭΗtĞƐƚ͕ĂĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨϳϮϰ͘ϴϯĨĞĞƚ͕ƚŽĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚĐĂƉ^ƚĂŵƉĞĚ͞D</DΘZ/E͘͟ cap set for a point of curve return for said proposed Williamson County Road Number 245 and said proposed Rocky Hollow Drive, being a curve to the left; THENCE, over and across said 1,013.527 acre tract and along the proposed North Right-of-Way line of said Rocky Hollow Drive, (73.00- foot Right-of-Way) the following eight (8) courses: 1. 39.00 feet along the arc of said curve return to the left having a Radius of 25.00 feet, with a delta angle of ϴϵΣϮϯΖϬϳΗ͕ǁŝƚŚĂĐŚŽƌĚďĞĂƌŝŶŐŽĨ^ŽƵƚŚϮϮΣϰϳΖϱϬΗĂƐƚ͕ǁŝƚŚĂĐŚŽƌĚůĞŶŐƚŚŽĨϯϱ͘ϭϳĨĞĞƚƚŽĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚ ĐĂƉ^ƚĂŵƉĞĚ͞D</DΘZ/E͘͟ĐĂƉƐĞƚĨŽƌĂƉŽŝŶƚŽĨƚĂŶŐĞŶĐǇ͖ 2.^ŽƵƚŚϲϳΣϮϵΖϭϴΗĂƐƚ͕ĂĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨϮϴϱ͘ϳϬĨĞĞƚ͕ƚŽĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚĐĂƉ^ƚĂŵƉĞĚ͞D</DΘZ/E͘͟ cap set for a point of curve to the left; 3.ϲϬϱ͘ϳϭĨĞĞƚĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞĂƌĐŽĨƐĂŝĚĐƵƌǀĞƚŽƚŚĞůĞĨƚŚĂǀŝŶŐĂZĂĚŝƵƐŽĨϰϭϯ͘ϱϬĨĞĞƚ͕ǁŝƚŚĂĚĞůƚĂĂŶŐůĞŽĨϴϯΣϱϱΖϰϯΗ͕ ǁŝƚŚĂĐŚŽƌĚďĞĂƌŝŶŐŽĨEŽƌƚŚϳϬΣϯϮΖϰϴΗĂƐƚ͕ǁŝƚŚĂĐŚŽƌĚůĞŶŐƚŚŽĨϱϱϮ͘ϵϵĨĞĞƚƚŽĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚĐĂƉ^ƚĂŵƉĞĚ ͞D</DΘZ/E͘͟ĐĂƉƐĞƚĨŽƌĂƉŽŝŶƚŽĨƚĂŶŐĞŶĐǇ͖ 4.EŽƌƚŚϮϴΣϯϰΖϱϲΗĂƐƚ͕ĂĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨϮϳϱ͘ϲϰĨĞĞƚƚŽĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚĐĂƉ^ƚĂŵƉĞĚ͞D</DΘZ/E͘͟ cap set for a point of curvature to the right; 5.ϭϬϰ͘ϯϱĨĞĞƚĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞĂƌĐŽĨƐĂŝĚĐƵƌǀĞƚŽƚŚĞƌŝŐŚƚŚĂǀŝŶŐĂZĂĚŝƵƐŽĨϳϲϭ͘ϱϬĨĞĞƚ͕ǁŝƚŚĂĚĞůƚĂĂŶŐůĞŽĨϬϳΣϱϭΖϬϱΗ͕ ǁŝƚŚĂĐŚŽƌĚďĞĂƌŝŶŐŽĨEŽƌƚŚϯϮΣϯϬΖϮϴΗĂƐƚ͕ǁŝƚŚĂĐŚŽƌĚůĞŶŐƚŚŽĨϭϬϰ͘ϮϳĨĞĞƚƚŽĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚĐĂƉ^ƚĂŵƉĞĚ ͞D</DΘZ/E͘͟ĐĂƉƐĞƚĨŽƌĂƉŽŝŶƚŽĨƚĂŶŐĞŶĐǇ͖ 6.EŽƌƚŚϯϲΣϮϲΖϬϭΗĂƐƚ͕ĂĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨϮϵϳ͘ϳϮĨĞĞƚƚŽĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚĐĂƉ^ƚĂŵƉĞĚ͞D</DΘZ/E͘͟ cap set for a point of curvature to the right; 7. 1545.65 feet along the arc of said curve to the right having a Radius of 1368.00 feet, with a delta angle of ϲϰΣϰϰΖϭϬΗ͕ǁŝƚŚĂĐŚŽƌĚďĞĂƌŝŶŐŽĨEŽƌƚŚϲϴΣϰϴΖϭϭΗĂƐƚ͕ǁŝƚŚĂĐŚŽƌĚůĞŶŐƚŚŽĨϭϰϲϰ͘ϳϯĨĞĞƚƚŽĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚ ĐĂƉ^ƚĂŵƉĞĚ͞D</DΘZ/E͘͟ĐĂƉƐĞƚĨŽƌĂƉŽŝŶƚŽĨƚĂŶŐĞŶĐǇ͖ 8.^ŽƵƚŚϳϴΣϰϵΖϰϰΗĂƐƚ͕ĂĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨϳϵϳ͘ϯϯĨĞĞƚƚŽĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚĐĂƉ^ƚĂŵƉĞĚ͞D</DΘZ/E͘͟ cap set for the northeast terminus of said proposed Rocky Hollow Drive, being a point in the common line of said ϭϬϭϯ͘ϱϮϳĂĐƌĞƚƌĂĐƚĂŶĚƚŚĞƐĂŝĚϮϳϵ͘͘ϵϵϵĂĐƌĞƚƌĂĐƚ͕ĨƌŽŵǁŚŝĐŚĂĨŽƵŶĚϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚ͞^hZsKE/E͘͟ĐĂƉ ĨŽƵŶĚĞĂƌƐ͗EŽƌƚŚϭϭΣϱϱΖϬϴΗĂƐƚ͕ϭϭϲ͘ϬϳĨĞĞƚ͖ THENCE, along the proposed east terminus the common line of said 279.999 acre tract and the remainder of said ϭ͕Ϭϭϯ͘ϱϮϳĂĐƌĞƚƌĂĐƚ͕^ŽƵƚŚϭϭΣϱϱΖϬϴΗtĞƐƚ͕ĂĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨϳϯ͘ϬϭĨĞĞƚƚŽƚŚĞPOINT OF BEGINNING containing a computed area of 37.46 acres of land, more or less. ________________________________ Date: Darrell D. White Registered Professional Land Surveyor Texas Registration Number 4816 Prepared by: Mckim&Creed 10000 Metric Blvd., Suite 200, Austin, Texas 78758 TBPLS Firm Registration number 101776-01 METES AND BOUNDS OF 37.46 ACRES PRELIMINARY PLAT OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS SUN CITY NEIGHOOD SIXTY-FOUR OUT OF THE FREDERICK FOY SURVEY, A-229 LEWIS P. DYCHES SURVEY, A-171 WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS Being 37.46 acres of land situated in the Frederick Foy Survey, A-229 and the Lewis P. Dyches Survey, A-171 of Williamson County, Texas and being a remainder portion of a called 1,013.527 acre tract conveyed to SOMERSET HILLS LIMITED, A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, By Document Number Recorded in 2004098880, of the Official Public Records of Williamson County, Texas (O.P.R.W.C.T.). Said 37.46 acre tract being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows with all bearings being referenced to the Texas State Plane Coordinate System, Texas Central Zone, NAD 83/93 HARN Datum. Coordinates shown hereon are grid and all distances were converted to surface by multiplying by the combined factor of 1.000143965. BEGINNINGĂƚĂϯͬϰͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚĨŽƵŶĚŝŶĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞ;yсϯ͕ϭϬϰ͕ϱϱϳ͘ϯϵ͕͕zсϭ͕Ϭϯϳ͕ϲϯϮ͘ϳϮͿĂƚƚŚĞŶŽƌƚŚǁĞƐƚĐŽƌŶĞƌŽĨ ƉůĂƚƚĞĚ>Žƚ͟͞KWE^WΘZ/E'^DEd>KdK&&/E>W>dhE/ds>KWDEdK&^hE/dz GEORGETOWN NEIGHBORHOOD FORTY-NINE, as recorded in Document Number 2014058925, of the (O.P.R.W.C.T), same being the southwesterly corner of a the remainder of called 279.999 acre tract conveyed to Del Webb LTD, by Document Number 1997019426 of the (O.P.R.W.C.T), being a point for the current southwest terminus of proposed Rocky Hollow Drive (73.00 Right-of-Way) also being a point in an south-easterly line of said remainder of 1,013.527 tract; ^ŽƵƚŚϭϭΣϱϱΖϬϴΗtĞƐƚ͕ĂĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨϯϰ͘ϯϲĨĞĞƚƚŽĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚŶŽĐĂƉĨŽƵŶĚĨŽƌĂŶĂŶŐůĞƉŽŝŶƚŚĞƌĞŽĨ͕ďĞŝŶŐ the northeast corner of a called 5.08 acre tract conveyed to William D. Turpin Jr. and wife, Karen E. Turpin by Document Number 2000047528 (O.R.W.C.T.), THENCE, generally along the fenced said southerly line of a remainder of said 1,013.527 acre tract, same being the northerly line of said 5.08 acre tract, the following four (4) courses: 1.^ŽƵƚŚϲϯΣϰϰΖϰϰΗtĞƐƚ͕ĂĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨϮϬϭ͘ϬϵĨĞĞƚƚŽĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚŶŽĐĂƉĨŽƵŶĚĨŽƌĂŶĂŶŐůĞƉŽŝŶƚ hereof; 2.^ŽƵƚŚϳϭΣϬϮΖϬϰΗtĞƐƚ͕ĂĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨϭϵ͘ϲϬĨĞĞƚƚŽĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚŶŽĐĂƉĨŽƵŶĚĨŽƌĂŶĂŶŐůĞƉŽŝŶƚŚĞƌĞŽĨ͕ 3.^ŽƵƚŚϲϲΣϭϳΖϱϭΗtĞƐƚ͕ĂĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨϭϭϵ͘ϰϲĨĞĞƚƚŽĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚŶŽĐĂƉĨŽƵŶĚĨŽƌĂŶĂŶŐůĞƉŽŝŶƚ hereof, 4.^ŽƵƚŚϲϴΣϯϯΖϭϬΗtĞƐƚ͕ĂĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨϮϵϯ͘ϰϲĨĞĞƚƚŽĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚŶŽĐĂƉĨŽƵŶĚĨŽƌĂŶĂŶŐůĞƉŽŝŶƚ hereof, being the northeast corner of a called 5.143 acre tract, conveyed to Reggie D. Higdon and Jacqueline D. Higdon by Document Number 2010021573 (O.R.W.C.T.), THENCE, generally along the fenced said southerly line of a remainder of said 1,013.527 acre tract, same being the northerly line of said 5.143 acre tract, the following three (3) courses: 1.^ŽƵƚŚϲϳΣϬϲΖϬϭΗtĞƐƚ͕ĂĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨϭϲϭ͘ϯϳĨĞĞƚƚŽĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚŶŽĐĂƉĨŽƵŶĚĨŽƌĂŶĂŶŐůĞƉŽŝŶƚ hereof, 2.^ŽƵƚŚϳϬΣϱϯΖϱϬΗtĞƐƚ͕ĂĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨϮϬϯ͘ϳϮĨĞĞƚƚŽĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚŶŽĐĂƉĨŽƵŶĚĨŽƌĂŶĂŶŐůĞƉŽŝŶƚ hereof, 3.^ŽƵƚŚϲϴΣϰϱΖϮϬΗtĞƐƚ͕ĂĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨϮϰϵ͘ϮϳĨĞĞƚƚŽĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚŶŽĐĂƉĨŽƵŶĚĨŽƌĂŶĂŶŐůĞƉŽŝŶƚ ŚĞƌĞŽĨ͕ďĞŝŶŐƚŚĞŶŽƌƚŚĞĂƐƚĐŽƌŶĞƌŽĨ>Žƚϯ͕ĞŶƚKĂŬƐƚĂƚĞƐ͕ĂƐƌĞĐŽƌĚĞĚŝŶĂďŝŶĞƚ͞W͕͟^ůŝĚĞƐϯϳϬͲϯϳϭ͕tŝůůŝĂŵƐŽŶ County Plat Records (W.C.P.R.) THENCE, generally along the fenced said southerly line of a remainder of said 1,013.527 acre tract, same being the northerly line of said Lot 3, Bent Oak Estates, and the following three (3) courses: 1.^ŽƵƚŚϲϴΣϰϰΖϭϳΗtĞƐƚ͕ĂĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨϮϵϴ͘ϱϭĨĞĞƚƚŽĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚŶŽĐĂƉĨŽƵŶĚĨŽƌĂŶĂŶŐůĞƉŽŝŶƚ hereof, 2.^ŽƵƚŚϲϳΣϮϴΖϮϱΗtĞƐƚ͕ĂĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨϭϯϮ͘ϭϯĨĞĞƚƚŽĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚŶŽĐĂƉĨŽƵŶĚĨŽƌĂŶĂŶŐůĞƉŽŝŶƚ hereof, 3.^ŽƵƚŚϲϴΣϮϲΖϯϭΗtĞƐƚ͕ĂĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨϭϳϴ͘ϳϴĨĞĞƚƚŽĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚŶŽĐĂƉĨŽƵŶĚĨŽƌĂŶĂŶŐůĞƉŽŝŶƚ ŚĞƌĞŽĨ͕ďĞŝŶŐƚŚĞŶŽƌƚŚĞĂƐƚĐŽƌŶĞƌŽĨZŝĚŐĞǀŝĞǁƐƚĂƚĞƐ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶdǁŽĂƐƌĞĐŽƌĚĞĚŝŶĂďŝŶĞƚ͞D͕͟^ůŝĚĞϯϰϯ;t͘͘W͘Z͘Ϳ THENCE, generally along the fenced said southerly line of a remainder of said 1,013.527 acre tract the northerly line of said Ridgeview Estates Section Two, the following three (3) courses: 1.^ŽƵƚŚϲϵΣϮϲΖϮϴΗtĞƐƚ͕ĂĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨϭϵϯ͘ϯϭĨĞĞƚƚŽĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚŶŽĐĂƉĨŽƵŶĚĨŽƌĂŶĂŶŐůĞƉŽŝŶƚ hereof, 2.^ŽƵƚŚϲϴΣϭϰΖϮϬΗtĞƐƚ͕ĂĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨϯϭϱ͘ϱϰĨĞĞƚƚŽĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚŶŽĐĂƉĨŽƵŶĚĨŽƌĂŶĂŶŐůĞƉŽŝŶƚ hereof, 3.^ŽƵƚŚϲϰΣϱϯΖϬϯΗtĞƐƚ͕ĂĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨϴϲ͘ϯϯĨĞĞƚƚŽĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚŶŽĐĂƉĨŽƵŶĚĨŽƌĂŶĂŶŐůĞƉŽŝŶƚŚĞƌĞŽĨ͕ the northwest corner of said Ridgeview Estates Section Two; THENCE, generally along the fenced easterly line of said 1,013.527 acre tract, same being the westerly line of said ZŝĚŐĞǀŝĞǁƐƚĂƚĞƐ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶdǁŽ͕^ŽƵƚŚϮϮΣϮϳΖϮϰΗĂƐƚ͕ĂĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨϭϲϱ͘ϴϵĨĞĞƚƚŽĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚĂƐƚĂŵƉĞĚ ͞D</DΘZ/E͘͟ĐĂƉƐĞƚĨŽƌĂĐŽƌŶĞƌŚĞƌĞŽĨ͖ THENCE, departing westerly line of said Ridgeview Estates Section Two, and over and across said 1,013.527 acre tract, the following nine (9) courses: 1.^ŽƵƚŚϲϵΣϬϳΖϬϰΗtĞƐƚ͕ĂĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨϭϰϰ͘ϯϰĨĞĞƚƚŽĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚĂƐƚĂŵƉĞĚ͞D</DΘZ/E͘͟ cap set for a corner hereof; 2.EŽƌƚŚϮϬΣϱϮΖϱϲΗtĞƐƚ͕ĂĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨϭϬ͘ϭϱĨĞĞƚƚŽĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚĂƐƚĂŵƉĞĚ͞D</DΘZ/E͘͟ĐĂƉ set for a point of curvature to the left hereof; 3.ϭϭϬ͘ϭϮĨĞĞƚĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞĂƌĐŽĨƐĂŝĚĐƵƌǀĞƚŽƚŚĞůĞĨƚŚĂǀŝŶŐĂZĂĚŝƵƐŽĨϮϱϬ͘ϬϬĨĞĞƚ͕ǁŝƚŚĂĚĞůƚĂĂŶŐůĞŽĨϮϱΣϭϰΖϭϰΗ͕ ǁŝƚŚĂĐŚŽƌĚďĞĂƌŝŶŐŽĨEŽƌƚŚϯϯΣϯϬΖϬϯΗtĞƐƚ͕ǁŝƚŚĂĐŚŽƌĚůĞŶŐƚŚŽĨϭϬϵ͘ϮϯĨĞĞƚƚŽĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚĐĂƉ ^ƚĂŵƉĞĚ͞D</DΘZ/E͘͟ĐĂƉƐĞƚĨŽƌĂƉŽŝŶƚŽĨƚĂŶŐĞŶĐǇŚĞƌĞŽĨ͖ 4.EŽƌƚŚϰϲΣϬϴΖϬϰΗtĞƐƚ͕ĂĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨϳϱ͘ϬϵĨĞĞƚƚŽĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚĐĂƉ^ƚĂŵƉĞĚ͞D</DΘZ/E͘͟ cap set for a point of curvature to the right; 5.ϯϲ͘ϯϯĨĞĞƚĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞĂƌĐŽĨƐĂŝĚĐƵƌǀĞƚŽƚŚĞƌŝŐŚƚŚĂǀŝŶŐĂZĂĚŝƵƐŽĨϮϱ͘ϬϬĨĞĞƚ͕ǁŝƚŚĂĚĞůƚĂĂŶŐůĞŽĨϴϯΣϭϱΖϰϲΗ͕ ǁŝƚŚĂĐŚŽƌĚďĞĂƌŝŶŐŽĨEŽƌƚŚϬϰΣϮϵΖϭϲΗtĞƐƚ͕ǁŝƚŚĂĐŚŽƌĚůĞŶŐƚŚŽĨϯϯ͘ϮϮĨĞĞƚƚŽĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚĐĂƉ^ƚĂŵƉĞĚ ͞D</DΘZ/E͘͟ĐĂƉƐĞƚĨŽƌĂƉŽŝŶƚŽĨƌĞǀĞƌƐĞĐƵƌǀĂƚƵƌĞƚŽƚŚĞƌŝŐŚƚŝŶƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƐŽƵƚŚ;ϳϯ͘ϬϬͲĨŽŽƚ Right-of-Way line of said Rocky Hollow Drive); 6.ϲϯϵ͘ϵϱĨĞĞƚĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞĂƌĐŽĨƐĂŝĚĐƵƌǀĞƚŽƚŚĞƌŝŐŚƚŚĂǀŝŶŐĂZĂĚŝƵƐŽĨϰϴϲ͘ϱϬĨĞĞƚ͕ǁŝƚŚĂĚĞůƚĂĂŶŐůĞŽĨϳϱΣϮϮΖϬϯΗ͕ ǁŝƚŚĂĐŚŽƌĚďĞĂƌŝŶŐŽĨ^ŽƵƚŚϳϰΣϰϵΖϰϭΗtĞƐƚ͕ǁŝƚŚĂĐŚŽƌĚůĞŶŐƚŚŽĨϱϵϰ͘ϴϬĨĞĞƚƚŽĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚĐĂƉ ^ƚĂŵƉĞĚ͞D</DΘZ/E͘͟ĐĂƉƐĞƚĨŽƌĂƉŽŝŶƚŽĨƚĂŶŐĞŶĐǇ͖ 7.EŽƌƚŚϲϳΣϮϵΖϭϴΗtĞƐƚ͕ĂĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨϮϴϱ͘ϬϰĨĞĞƚƚŽĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚĐĂƉ^ƚĂŵƉĞĚ͞D</DΘZ/E͘͟ cap set for a point of curve return to the left, for the proposed additional Right-of-Way of Williamson County Road Number 245, being a curve to the left; 8.ϯϴ͘ϴϯĨĞĞƚĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞĂƌĐŽĨƐĂŝĚĐƵƌǀĞƚŽƚŚĞůĞĨƚŚĂǀŝŶŐĂZĂĚŝƵƐŽĨϮϱ͘ϬϬĨĞĞƚ͕ǁŝƚŚĂĚĞůƚĂĂŶŐůĞŽĨϴϴΣϱϵΖϱϵΗ͕ ǁŝƚŚĂĐŚŽƌĚďĞĂƌŝŶŐŽĨ^ŽƵƚŚϲϴΣϬϭΖϬϳΗtĞƐƚ͕ǁŝƚŚĂĐŚŽƌĚůĞŶŐƚŚŽĨϯϱ͘ϬϱĨĞĞƚƚŽĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚĐĂƉ^ƚĂŵƉĞĚ ͞D</DΘZ/E͘͟ĐĂƉƐĞƚĨŽƌĂƉŽŝŶƚŽĨĐƵƌǀĂƚƵƌĞƚŽƚŚĞƌŝŐŚƚ͖ 9. 476.58 feet along the arc of said curve to the right having a Radius of 1660.00 feet, with a delta angle of ϭϲΣϮϲΖϱϴΗ͕ǁŝƚŚĂĐŚŽƌĚďĞĂƌŝŶŐŽĨ^ŽƵƚŚϯϭΣϰϰΖϯϳΗtĞƐƚ͕ǁŝƚŚĂĐŚŽƌĚůĞŶŐƚŚŽĨϰϳϰ͘ϵϰĨĞĞƚƚŽĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚ ĐĂƉ^ƚĂŵƉĞĚ͞D</DΘZ/E͘͟ĐĂƉƐĞƚĨŽƌĂƉŽŝŶƚŝŶƚŚĞĞĂƐƚŵĂƌŐŝŶŽĨĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐtŝůůŝĂŵƐŽŶŽƵŶƚǇZŽĂĚEƵŵďĞƌ 245 as described in Document Number 9553392 of the Williamson County Deed Records, from which a found 1/2-inch ŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚŶŽĐĂƉĨŽƵŶĚĞĂƌƐ͗^ŽƵƚŚϮϭΣϰϰΖϰϰΗĂƐƚ͕ϱϬϱ͘ϱϮĨĞĞƚ͖ DARRELL D. WHITE 4816 ST A T E O F T E X A S L A N D S U R V E Y O R PRELIMINARY PLAT SUN CITY NEIGHBORHOOD SIXTY-FOUR BEING A SUBDIVISION OF 37.46 ACRES IN THE FREDERICK FOY SURVEY, ABSTRACT No.229 AND LEWIS P. DYCHES SURVEY, ABSTRACT No.171 WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS Exhibit B PP-2014-019 GEORGETOWN, TX 78626 STEGERBIZZELL.COM >>ENGINEERS >>PLANNERS >>SURVEYORS 512.930.9412 SERVICES METRO ADDRESS 1978 S. AUSTIN AVENUE WEB DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:APPROVED BY: Th e s e d r a w i n g s a r e t h e s o l e p r o p e r t y o f S T E G E R B I Z Z E L L . T h e u s e o f t h e s e d r a w i n g s i s h e r e b y r e s t r i c t e d t o t h e o r i g i n a l s i t e f o r w h i c h t h e y w e r e p r e p a r e d . R e p r o d u c t i o n o r r e u s e o f t h e s e d r a w i n g s i n w h o l e o r i n p a r t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n p e r m i s s i o n o f S T E G E R B I Z Z E L L i s s t r i c t l y p r o h i b i t e d . TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-181 TBPLS FIRM No.10003700 STATE OF TEXAS { KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON { I, Somerset Hills, Ltd, owners of the certain tract of land shown hereon and described in a deed recorded in Doc. ηϮϬϬϰϬϵϴϴϴϬŽĨƚŚĞKĨĮĐŝĂůZĞĐŽƌĚƐŽĨtŝůůŝĂŵƐŽŶŽƵŶƚǇ͕dĞǆĂƐ͕ĚŽŚĞƌĞďǇƌĞƐƵďĚŝǀŝĚĞƐĂŝĚƚƌĂĐƚĂƐƐŚŽǁŶ hereon, and do hereby consent to all plat note requirements shown hereon, and do hereby dedicate to the City of Georgetown the streets, alleys, rights-of-way, easements and public places shown hereon for such public purposes as the City of Georgetown may deem appropriate. This subdivision is to be known as PRELIMINARY PLAT, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS SUN CITY NEIGHBOR HOODS SIXTY-FOUR. TO CERTIFY WHICH, WITNESS by my hand this ________ day of ______________________ , 2014 . ___________________________ Manager Somerset Hills, Ltd. 2500 N. Buffalo Drive, Suite 150 Las Vegas, Nevada 89128 STATE OF TEXAS { KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON { Before me, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared __________________ , known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed, in the capacity therein stated. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL of office this_________ day of _________________________ , 2014 . ___________________________________________ Notary Public in and for the State of Texas My Commission expires on: _________________ I, Bryan E. Moore , Registered Professional Engineer in the State of Texas, do hereby certify that this subdivision ŝƐŝŶƚŚĞĚǁĂƌĚƐƋƵŝĨĞƌZĞĐŚĂƌŐĞŽŶĞĂŶĚŝƐŶŽƚĞŶĐƌŽĂĐŚĞĚďǇĂŽŶĞŇŽŽĚĂƌĞĂ͕ĂƐĚĞŶŽƚĞĚŚĞƌĞŝŶ͕ĂŶĚĂƐ ĚĞĮŶĞĚďǇ&ĞĚĞƌĂůŵĞƌŐĞŶĐǇDĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƚŝŽŶ&ůŽŽĚ,ĂǌĂƌĚŽƵŶĚĂƌǇDĂƉ͕ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚǇWĂŶĞů Number 48491C0275E, effective date September 26, 2008, and that each lot conforms to the City of Georgetown regulations.The fully developed, concentrated stormwater runoff resulting from the one hundred (100) year frequency storm is contained within the drainage easements shown and/or public rights-of-way dedicated by this plat. TO CERTIFY WHICH, WITNESS my hand and seal at Georgetown , Williamson County , Texas, this _____ day of_________________ , 2014. __________________________________ Bryan E. Moore Registered Professional Engineer No. 98920 State of Texas /͕ŶĚƌĞǁ^ƉƵƌŐŝŶ͕WůĂŶŶŝŶŐŝƌĞĐƚŽƌŽĨƚŚĞŝƚǇŽĨ'ĞŽƌŐĞƚŽǁŶ͕ĚŽŚĞƌĞďǇĐĞƌƚŝĨǇƚŚŝƐƉůĂƚŝƐĂƉƉƌŽǀĞĚĨŽƌĮůŝŶŐŽĨ record with the County Clerk of Williamson County, Texas. ______________________________ _______________________ Andrew Spurgin, Planning Director Date ĂƐĞĚƵƉŽŶƚŚĞƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶƐŽĨƚŚĞĞŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŽƌƐƵƌǀĞǇŽƌǁŚŽƐĞƐĞĂůŝƐĂĨĮǆĞĚŚĞƌĞƚŽ͕ĂŶĚĂĨƚĞƌƌĞǀŝĞǁ ŽĨƚŚĞƉůĂƚĂƐƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĞĚďǇƚŚĞƐĂŝĚĞŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŽƌƐƵƌǀĞǇŽƌ͕/ĮŶĚƚŚĂƚƚŚŝƐƉůĂƚĐŽŵƉůŝĞƐǁŝƚŚƚŚĞtŝůůŝĂŵƐŽŶ ŽƵŶƚǇ&ůŽŽĚƉůĂŝŶZĞŐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ͘dŚŝƐĐĞƌƚŝĮĐĂƚŝŽŶŝƐŵĂĚĞƐŽůĞůǇƵƉŽŶƐƵĐŚƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶƐĂŶĚƐŚŽƵůĚŶŽƚďĞ ƌĞůŝĞĚƵƉŽŶĨŽƌǀĞƌŝĮĐĂƚŝŽŶƐŽĨƚŚĞĨĂĐƚƐĂůůĞŐĞĚ͘tŝůůŝĂŵƐŽŶŽƵŶƚǇĚŝƐĐůĂŝŵƐĂŶǇƌĞƐƉŽŶƐŝďŝůŝƚǇƚŽĂŶǇŵĞŵďĞƌ ŽĨƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐĨŽƌŝŶĚĞƉĞŶĚĞŶƚǀĞƌŝĮĐĂƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶƐ͕ĨĂĐƚƵĂůŽƌŽƚŚĞƌǁŝƐĞ͕ĐŽŶƚĂŝŶĞĚŝŶƚŚŝƐƉůĂƚĂŶĚ the documents associated within it. ______________________________ ______________________________ Joe M. England, P.E. Date Williamson County Floodplain Administrator ĂƐĞĚƵƉŽŶƚŚĞĂďŽǀĞƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶƐŽĨƚŚĞĞŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŽƌƐƵƌǀĞǇŽƌǁŚŽƐĞƐĞĂůŝƐĂĨĮǆĞĚŚĞƌĞƚŽ͕ĂŶĚĂĨƚĞƌĂ ƌĞǀŝĞǁŽĨƚŚĞƐƵƌǀĞǇĂƐƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĞĚďǇƚŚĞƐĂŝĚĞŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŽƌƐƵƌǀĞǇŽƌ͕/ĮŶĚƚŚĂƚƚŚŝƐďůƵĞůŝŶĞ;ƐƵƌǀĞǇͿĐŽŵƉůŝĞƐ with the requirements of Edwards Aquifer Regulations for Williamson County and Williamson County On-Site ^ĞǁĂŐĞ&ĂĐŝůŝƚǇZĞŐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ͘dŚŝƐĐĞƌƚŝĮĐĂƚŝŽŶŝƐŵĂĚĞƐŽůĞůǇƵƉŽŶƐƵĐŚƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶƐĂŶĚƐŚŽƵůĚŶŽƚďĞ ƌĞůŝĞĚƵƉŽŶĨŽƌǀĞƌŝĮĐĂƚŝŽŶƐŽĨƚŚĞĨĂĐƚƐĂůůĞŐĞĚ͘dŚĞtŝůůŝĂŵƐŽŶŽƵŶƚǇĂŶĚŝƚŝĞƐ,ĞĂůƚŚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ;t,Ϳ ĂŶĚtŝůůŝĂŵƐŽŶŽƵŶƚǇĚŝƐĐůĂŝŵĂŶǇƌĞƐƉŽŶƐŝďŝůŝƚǇƚŽĂŶǇŵĞŵďĞƌŽĨƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐĨŽƌŝŶĚĞƉĞŶĚĞŶƚǀĞƌŝĮĐĂƚŝŽŶŽĨ the representations, factual or otherwise, contained in this blue line (survey) and the documents associated with it. ______________________________ _______________________ Deborah L. Marlow, RS OS0029596 Date Assistant Deputy Director Environmental Health Services, WCCHD STATE OF TEXAS { KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON { I, Nancy Rister, Clerk of the County Court of said County, do hereby certify that the foregoing ŝŶƐƚƌƵŵĞŶƚŝŶǁƌŝƚŝŶŐ͕ǁŝƚŚŝƚƐĐĞƌƚŝĮĐĂƚĞǁĂƐĮůĞĚĨŽƌƌĞĐŽƌĚŝŶŵǇŽĨĨŝĐĞŽŶƚŚĞͺͺͺͺͺĚĂǇŽĨͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ϮϬͺͺ͕ ͕͘͘ĂƚͺͺͺͺͺŽ͛ĐůŽĐŬ͕ͺͺ͘ŵ͘ĂŶĚĚƵůǇƌĞĐŽƌĚĞĚŽŶƚŚĞͺͺͺͺͺĚĂǇŽĨͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ϮϬͺͺͺ͕͕͘͘ĂƚͺͺͺŽ͛ĐůŽĐŬ͕ ___.m. in the Plat Records of said County in Document No._______________________________. TO CERTIFY WHICH, WITNESS my hand and seal at the County Court of said County, at my office in Georgetown, Texas the date last shown above written. Nancy Rister, Clerk County Court of Williamson County, Texas By:_______________________Deputy This subdivision known as PRELIMINARY PLAT, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS SUN CITY NEIGHBOR HOODS SIXTY-FOUR, has been approved for filing for record according to the minutes of the meeting of the Georgetown Planning and Zoning Commission on the _____day of ________________, 2014. A.D. __________________________________ ____________________ John Horne, Chairman Date Planning and Zoning Commission City of Georgetown __________________________________ _____________________ Bob Brent, Secretary Date ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS, PLANNERS 10000 Metric Blvd, Suite 200 Austin, TX 78758 512.916.0224 www.mckimcreed.com JOB No. 22226 DATE: AUGUST, 2014 SHEET 8 of 8 FOR REVIEW. THIS DOCUMENT IS RELEASED FOR THE PURPOSE OF REVIEW UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF BRYAN E. MOORE, P.E. REG. #98920 ON 12/9/14. IT IS NOT TO BE USED FOR BIDDING, PERMIT OR CONSTRUCTION. PRELIMINARY PLAT SUN CITY NEIGHBORHOOD SIXTY-FOUR BEING A SUBDIVISION OF 37.46 ACRES IN THE FREDERICK FOY SURVEY, ABSTRACT No.229 AND LEWIS P. DYCHES SURVEY, ABSTRACT No.171 WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS Exhibit B PP-2014-019 City of Georgetown, Texas Planning and Zoning December 16, 2014 SUBJECT: Acceptance of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan Annual Report -- Jordan J. Maddox, AICP, Principal Planner ITEM SUMMARY: An Annual Update is a mandatory component of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, in order to provide a status report on the implementation of the 2030 Plan and other noteworthy actions that may impact plan implementation. The 2014 report includes the statistical report regularly provided to the Planning and Zoning Commission. No specific action is required. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. SUBMITTED BY: Jordan Maddox ATTACHMENTS: Description Type 2014 Annual Report Backup Material Comprehensive Plan Element List Backup Material Statistical Analysis Backup Material Georgetown Planning Department 2030 Plan Annual Update - 2014 Page 1 of 6 2030 Plan Annual Update: 2014 Background The 2030 Comprehensive Plan was unanimously adopted by City Council on February 26, 2008. The Plan was an update from Georgetown’s 1988 Century Plan. One of the primary tenets of the new plan was the establishment of an annual update that would review past and future implementation items. The Annual Update focuses on the status of remaining comprehensive plan elements, plan implementation efforts over the last year and new goals and actions to be worked on between now and the 2015 update. In addition to the annual update, the 2030 Plan anticipates a 5-year review that will be a more thorough review of elements and implementation, adoptions of new elements and vision statements, etc. In 2013, the Planning and Zoning Commission (P&Z) and City Council agreed to delay the 5-year revision until it becomes apparent that the plan needs such an update, but no later than 2018. The staff recommendation is to begin the 5-year revision process in 2015 to coincide with the hiring of a new city manager. Plan Element Update Completed and Ongoing Elements Since the adoption of the 2030 Plan, four plan elements have been adopted by Council, with several more in various stages of development. The Parks Master Plan and Water and Electric Master Plans were completed in 2009, with Council adopting the Executive Summary for both Utility Plans. An update to the Overall Transportation Plan is nearing completion, with hearings planned for first quarter 2015. The Citizen Participation Plan was developed by staff with the help of a citizen advisory committee and was approved in 2010. The Housing Plan was funded in 2008 and, after several attempts, approved in July 2012. In December 2012, a Public Safety Element was approved as an in-house overview to ongoing departmental strategic plans. In 2014, an update to the Downtown Master Plan was approved by Council. The remaining comprehensive plan elements have been discussed more abstractly, with no funding source or plan for completion at this time. These include a new Economic Development plan, Natural Resources/Conservation, Urban Design, Health and Human Services, and components of the utility plan such as drainage and solid waste. Attached is a summary of approved, active and future plan elements. Actions Affecting the 2030 Plan in 2013-14 Over the last calendar year, there were multiple decisions and actions that have or will affect the short and long-term implementation efforts of the 2030 Plan. These include newly annexed lands, rezonings, land use changes, ETJ boundary extension, utility merger with Chisholm Trail, and the listing of the Georgetown Salamander on the list of threatened species. Georgetown Planning Department 2030 Plan Annual Update - 2014 Page 2 of 6 Annexation Since 2011, all approved annexations were voluntary in nature and it is likely that calendar year 2015 will continue this pattern, although staff is preparing to develop a new Annexation and ETJ Growth Strategic Plan in 2015 which may offer recommendations for some unilateral (City- initiated annexations). Since the last annual update in 2013, multiple parcels were annexed totaling 2,334.92 acres, including one disannexation for 28.40 acres (as part of an ETJ release to Round Rock). By the end of 2014, Georgetown city limits had expanded to 35,436.66 acres, or 55.37 square miles. The City’s population within those 55 square miles, according to staff estimates, is approximately 54,000 inside the city limits, with about 80,000 if the ETJ is included. In September of 2012, the City Council approved a resolution declaring the City’s population to have exceeded 50,000. The effect of this action is that the City’s extra-territorial jurisdiction (ETJ) boundary line extended from 2 miles to 3½ miles from the outer edge of the city limits. In most areas of the ETJ, the City has approved boundary agreements with neighboring municipalities and the resolution did not alter the existing boundary. To the northwest of the ETJ, however, Georgetown has no such agreements and the ETJ was extended, adding 11,000 acres into Georgetown’s jurisdiction. This has significant impacts on future land use authority, potential utility growth areas and flexibility for the city in the future. One ETJ release for 20 acres occurred in 2014. Another 52 acres is currently under negotiations for release for a proposed Leander MUD. Zoning Amendments When the Century Plan was the City’s comprehensive planning document, it was common practice to change the Future Land Use Plan and Intensity Plan in order to develop or plan to develop a piece of property. The 2030 Plan is more conceptual in nature, guiding staff, developers, P&Z, and City Council in decision-making for zoning and development intensity without necessitating changes by ordinance to the various maps. The adaptation of this land use strategy for the long-term planning efforts of the Utility Master Plans has led to greater efficiency and certainty in those plans while still allowing flexibility for new or different developments as the need occurs organically. There have been 37 separate rezonings approved by City Council since 2012, yet only one comprehensive plan amendment was necessary to carry out the rezoning. This gives a good indication of the flexibility that the 2030 Future Land Use Plan has provided applicants, and also how it has empowered staff to make planning decisions based on more than just the designations on the map. The 2030 Plan is a guide based on the long-term goals and aspirations of the community and has been successful in this regard. Attached is the updated statistical report for both the zoning map and future land use map. There are no staff-initiated comprehensive plan amendments for 2013 and there were no submitted amendments by citizens/landowners during the open calendar period. Georgetown Planning Department 2030 Plan Annual Update - 2014 Page 3 of 6 Future Land Use Plan The Future Land Use Plan has not been changed considerably since its adoption in 2008 and merits a thoughtful study in 2015 as to projected densities, land use designations, and strategic planning for desired uses. Commercial and Employment Center areas, in particular, deserve a comprehensive effort by Planning, Utilities, Transportation, Finance and Economic Development Staff to develop a strategy that will utilize all of our resources to promote these areas. Residential development is continuing to deteriorate land areas available for employment-centered development – those large land areas with good utilities and transportation access – and the City needs to determine whether to recommit our efforts towards reserving and incentivizing these areas or allow them to develop as other land uses more suited to the current marketplace. Housing, particular workforce and attainable housing, is another land use project being developed by the Housing Board to further the Housing Element of the 2030 Plan. They have identified areas that are well-suited for higher density residential based on proximity to employment, retail and civic uses, and are often underutilized and, therefore, could be targeted for incentives. Staff would also like to explore some more detailed corridor planning, or defined-area planning (such as Williams Drive Gateway, the TOD area, etc.) that might be linked to special financing districts to provide a boost to developers building a desired product. Goals, Policies, and Actions Implementation Summary The first goal of the Land Use Plan Element is to “Promote sound, sustainable, and compact development patterns with balanced land uses, a variety of housing choices…” Many of the policies and actions throughout the plan relate to establishing guidelines to encourage a balanced mix of housing, commercial, and employment uses. City Council has accomplished many of these intentions with the adoption of the Mixed-Use Zoning District. The immediate (0-2 year) priority actions that were addressed by staff since 2010 are listed below. Many of these items have been recommended by the UDC Task Force as part of the UDC Annual Review process; the majority of these items have been adopted or soon will be considered by City Council. Items considered and principally completed since 2010 1.A. Encourage a balanced mix of residential, commercial, and employment uses at varying densities and intensities, to reflect a gradual transition from urban to suburban to rural development. 1.C. Establish standards appropriate for new residential development pertaining to lot sizes, open space, buffers, road connectivity, etc. 1.D. Establish improved standards for commercial development. 1.E.1. Establish standards for and actively promote new forms of compact development to include Transit-Oriented Development, as well as tr aditional neighborhood development (TND), mixed-use, and pedestrian-scale development. Georgetown Planning Department 2030 Plan Annual Update - 2014 Page 4 of 6 1.E.3. Promote mixed-use, pedestrian-friendly land use patterns, including community activity centers, neighborhood activity centers, conservatio n subdivisions, and walkable neighborhoods. 2.A.2. Overlay districts (where specific requirements could be modified to allow established character to be maintained; e.g., buildings pulled up to the street, credit for on- street/shared parking, etc.) 2.A.3. Adjust the City’s schedule of development fees (e.g., development review fees and costs to upgrade infrastructure) to lessen financial burdens on investments in designated areas and more accurately reflect the different costs of providing services in developed areas (where infrastructure is available), suburban areas, and f ringe areas (where costly infrastructure extensions are necessary). 2.B.2: Through the City’s Capital Improvement Program, prioritize short and long-range capital investments in designated urban areas, including but not limited to utility replacements, capacity improvements, area-wide stormwater systems, street improvements, etc. 4.B. Revise the UDC to ensure development that is compatible in character with the surrounding context. 4C: Develop and apply neighborhood conservation strategies such as code enforcement and house rehabilitation programs. 4.D. Revise the UDC to ensure proper transitions and buffering between established neighborhoods and adjacent commercial and manufacturing areas. Goals, Policies and Actions for 2015 For 2015, staff will explore other implementation items of the Future Land Use Element, including completing work with the UDC Commission on the list of updates to the UDC. The UDC is and will be crucial to execution of the policies and actions of the 2030 Plan and staff will continue to recommend updates to the development code as warranted in the future. Other plans and implementation strategies will parallel UDC updates, such as the CIP, Utility and Transportation Plans, Special District and Annexation Plans, and others. Below are more specific projects for 2015 that will further the larger 2030 Plan goals and policies. Upcoming Projects Affecting the 2030 Plan in 2015 There are several projects related to the 2030 Plan that are ongoing or will get underway in 2015. These include: • The finalization of the Water and Wastewater Master Plan Updates • Development and consideration of new or updated 2030 Plan elements • Transportation Plan Update implementation steps, including how Traffic Impact Studies are used, roadway planning, connectivity, public safety delivery, and sidewalk planning • Conservation efforts related to natural resource planning, particularly water • Continued updates to the UDC • Work with the Housing Board on housing plan implementation • Parks Planning requirements, for traditional development and special districts • Consideration of the 1460/Westinghouse/Sam Houston development area and TIZ area • Special District expansion and other alternative financing incentives for infrastructure Georgetown Planning Department 2030 Plan Annual Update - 2014 Page 5 of 6 • Annexation and ETJ Growth Strategic Plan • Airport Master Plan Update and zoning revision • HB 1445 agreement discussion with Williamson County regarding subdivision standards, urban development in the ETJ, and roadway planning • Other ongoing implementation items of the adopted 2030 Plan Elements • The 5-year revision will likely see some suggestions of new Goals, Policies and Actions as we continue to evolve as a community and adapt to quickly changing circumstances. Five-Year Revision In addition to these items, the City has been participating in several discussions on topics that could have a significant effect on the future growth and development of the community. In 2013, Staff recommended that the 5-Year Revision be delayed for the following reasons: • The listing of the Georgetown Salamander by U.S. Fish and Wildlife and possible constraints to development. The result of this decision will cause the City to potentially rethink future land use assumptions and review development/infrastructure standards to adapt to new environmental requirements. o Update: Now that the Salamander listing has occurred and the Council is adopting permanent water quality measures in support of Fish and Wildlife’s Section 4 (d) implementation rule, staff and the development community continue to gauge the full impact of this decision. Processes are being established and the regulations are being clarified, with more work to be done in 2015. The listing will be considered in future updates to the City’s land use plans. • The Chisholm Trail Special Utility District merger discussions, which have been ongoing for about two years and are intended to address long-term water supply issues in the area. Georgetown and Chisholm officials have discussed ways to handle water service in regards to long-term raw water supply in the midst of drought conditions, fire protection, increased urbanization in rural areas, municipal utility district effects on water needs, and other crucial aspects of development pressures on potable water. The result of this decision will affect the way that the City looks at land use, wastewater, fire protection, and future annexations. o Update: The merger between the two utilities has occurred and implementation of that merger has begun. Much future planning will need to take place in regards to raw water planning, land use/density assumptions and the effect it will have on sewer extension and urban development in the Western District. • Possible revision to the City’s 2005 Annexation policy. City staff have discussed a review of the Annexation policy as the City looks toward future service needs, cost of expansion, and the resources needed to achieve the ultimate goals. o Staff will begin work in 2015 developing a new policy for annexation and ETJ growth, including formalizing the Interim MUD Policy for special district development. This strategy for utility, financial, and land use planning will Georgetown Planning Department 2030 Plan Annual Update - 2014 Page 6 of 6 coincide with the utility master plans, transportation update, parks planning efforts and future land use updates. • City of Excellence implementation and other Council-defined goals. o The 2030 Comprehensive Plan is a long-term tool to map out incremental progress towards goal established by the community. The 2030 Plan is complementary to, and an integral component of, any annual and 5-year goals set by the Council and staff through the budgetary process. The community vision for what Georgetown strives to be should be at the forefront of short-term decision making in any future processes. If updates to this visioning are desired, the 5-year vision process. Summary The 2030 Comprehensive Plan is at a point where a thoughtful update is necessary, one that accounts for a significant growth boom in the last couple of years and may continue in the short-term. Georgetown will be adding many new residents, reacting to regulatory changes, experiencing shifts in growth and development philosophies, and continuing to be a popular place to do business, all while trying to plan for the future. A long-term strategy is a crucial component for our preparations for the future of the community, while maintain the flexibility needed to adapt and evolve. The comprehensive plan allows stakeholders to collectively plan for the betterment of the city, determine how we project ourselves to the outside world, and design the kind of community in which we desire to live. The next step forward in that process is to continue to keep the plan at the forefront of the discussion, with a formal revision to the plan being the step recommended in 2015. 2030 Plan Element List Future Element Funding Status Completion* Board/Commission Manager Lead Dept. 1. Economic Development none new 2016 GEDCO/4A/4B consultant EcoDevo 2. Conservation/Resources none new 2016 P&Z consultant Conservation 3. Historic Preservation none new 2016 P&Z/HARC consultant Downtown 4. Infrastructure (solid waste, drainage)none new 2017 GUS consultant/staff GUS 5. Urban Design none new 2017 P&Z consultant Planning 6. Health and Human Services none new 2017 P&Z consultant TBD 7. Public Facilities none new 2016 TBD consultant City Manager In-Progress Element List 1. Transportation funded update 2015 P&Z/GTAB consultant Transportation 2. Annexation and ETJ Growth Plan none new 2015 P&Z staff Planning Completed Elements - officially adopted Date adopted Working Element List - Not officially adopted 1. Future Land Use Plan 2008 1. Public Services (CIP) 2. Airport Master Plan 1998 (updated '03) 2. Public Facilities 3. Downtown Master Plan 2003 (updated '14) 4. Parks/Recreation 2009 5. Infrastructure/Utility (water, wastewater) 2009 Note: Water and Wastewater Master Plans being updated for 2015 adoption 6. Infrastructure/Utility (electric) 2009 7. Citizen Participation Plan 2010 8. Housing 2012 9. Public Safety 2013 * Anticipated Georgetown Planning Department Dec 2014 Statistical Analysis Report Item Description Consideration of a quarterly report consisting of planning and housing data. Item Summary Since April of 2012, staff has mined several data sources to present a statistical report of land use, zoning, and housing data on a regular basis. The following information is an update of the tables containing data regarding the City’s Future Land Use Plan, the Official Zoning Map, and housing unit numbers compiled from multiple sources. Generally, the data is provided every 3-6 months depending on the amount of changes to the data. The data is informational only and is provided simply as a tool for the Commission. Future Land Use Plan The following table gives the breakdown of the land use categories, shown within the city limits and the total ETJ. Future Land Use Plan ETJ + City Limits City Limits Land Use Acres % of total Δ in acres from previous Acres % of total Δ in acres from previous Agricultural/Rural Residential 29,688 25.75% - 80 0.22% - Low Density Residential 26,037 22.58% (456) 1,809 5.09% 79 Moderate Density Residential 17,345 15.04% 727 11,727 32.99% 1,785 High Density Residential 600 0.52% 48 590 1.66% 48 Community Commercial 1,583 1.37% - 1,082 3.05% (9) Regional Commercial 2,156 1.87% (125) 1,627 4.58% 111 Mixed Use Community 6,448 5.59% - 2,382 6.70% 12 Mixed Use Neighborhood Center 1,260 1.09% (82) 684 1.92% 6 Specialty Area Mixed Use 1,208 1.05% (111) 707 1.99% 19 Employment Center 4,945 4.29% - 3,515 9.89% 99 Institutional 1.78% 5.44% 1 Georgetown Planning Department Dec 2014 Statistical Analysis Report 2,056 (1) 1,935 Parks, Recreation, Open Space 16,769 14.54% 1 9,379 26.38% 110 Mining 5,203 4.51% - 32 0.09% - Total 115,298 - 35,550 2,260 Source: Future Land Use Plan GIS Official Zoning Map The following table breaks down the existing zoning districts. Rights-of-way are not typically given a zoning designation; therefore, the total zoned acreage is less than the total city limits area. Georgetown Planning Department Dec 2014 Statistical Analysis Report Zoning Districts Acres % of total Δ in acres from previous Agriculture (AG) 13,003 40.92% 726 Residential Estate (RE) - 0.00% - Residential Low Density (RL) 30 0.10% (0) Residential Single Family (RS) 13,465 42.38% 1,300 Two Family (TF) 62 0.19% - Townhouse (TH) 22 0.07% - Low Density Multifamily (MF-1) 18 0.06% 18 High Density Multifamily (MF-2) 567 1.78% (12) Manufactured Housing (MH) 83 0.26% - Business Park (BP) 187 0.59% - Neighborhood Commercial (CN) 24 0.08% 11 Local Commercial (C-1) 1,219 3.84% (24) General Commercial (C-3) 1,386 4.36% 29 Office (OF) 153 0.48% (0) Industrial (IN) 1,179 3.71% (23) Mixed Use Downtown (MU-DT) 68 0.21% 5 Mixed Use (MU) 0.00% - Public Facilities (PF) 310 0.97% 6 Total 31,776 2,037 Overlays Planned Unit Development Georgetown Planning Department Dec 2014 Statistical Analysis Report 7,875 1,202 Historic 18 - Downtown 109 - Old Town 371 - Source: Zoning GIS Map Housing Unit Comparison and Population Using 2010 Census data, a 2010 market study of high-density residential housing units, GIS address point data, and monthly new residential building permits, staff is able to piece together a fairly accurate picture of “multi-family” vs. “single-family” households in Georgetown. The table below breaks down the total amount of housing units (occupied and vacant) by single-family and multi-family types. Note that the data below represents actual livable Georgetown Planning Department Dec 2014 Statistical Analysis Report housing units, not approved or entitled properties that would allow future single-family or multifamily housing units. Also included below are the updated population estimates for the city limits and ETJ. Housing Units City City + ETJ Sources: Single Family Units 19,049 29,785 2010 Census + building permits+ETJ estimate Apartment/duplex/fourplex/condos 3,970 3,970 Market report + address points Total housing units 23,019 33,755 Percentage of single-family units 82.75% 88.24% Percentage of multifamily units 17.25% 11.76% Updated October 2014 Population City City + ETJ Sources: Total Population Estimate, October 2014 53,536 79,594 Planning Department Estimated Population Attachments None Submitted By Jordan J. Maddox, AICP, Principal Planner City of Georgetown, Texas Planning and Zoning December 16, 2014 SUBJECT: Public Hearing and possible action on a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, changing approximately 73 acres on the Future Land Use Plan from Employment Center to Moderate Density Residential for Three Forks Ranch, located near Airport Road and Brangus Road. CPA- 2014-003 Jordan J. Maddox, AICP, Principal Planner ITEM SUMMARY: The proposed comprehensive plan amendment request removes approximately 73 acres of land from the Employment Center designation and replaces it with Moderate Density Residential. The amendment would allow a concurrent zoning request to be considered. The proposed development project is similar to a Planned Unit Development (PUD) project approved for this site in 2008, with the land use adjustment necessary to allow for more land area to be developed for single- family without the requirements of the PUD. Public Comments None received as of the writing of this report Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the comprehensive plan amendment. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None at this time. The applicant has paid the required fees. SUBMITTED BY: Jordan Maddox ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Staff Report Backup Material Location Map Backup Material Future Land Use Map Backup Material Existing Zoning Map Backup Material Aerial Map Backup Material Proposed Land Use Change Backup Material Georgetown Planning Department Staff Report Three Forks 2015 PUD release (CPA) Page 1 of 3 Report Date: December 10, 2014 File No: CPA-2014-003 Project Planner: Jordan J. Maddox, AICP, Principal Planner Item Details Project Name: Three Forks Ranch Location: Airport Road Total Acreage: 285.74 acres Legal Description: 285.74 acres in the Wright Survey Applicant: Gary Newman Property Owner: Glynn Buie Contact: Gary Newman Existing Use: Agricultural Future Land Use: Moderate Density Residential, Employment Center Proposed Change: Less Employment Center area Growth Tier: Tier 1 Overview of Applicant’s Request The proposed comprehensive plan amendment request removes approximately 73 acres of land from the Employment Center designation and replaces it with Moderate Density Residential. The amendment would allow a concurrent zoning request to be considered. The proposed development project is similar to a Planned Unit Development (PUD) project approved for this site in 2008, with the land use adjustment necessary to allow for more land area to be developed for single-family without the requirements of the PUD. Site Information Location: Airport Road near Berry Creek and I-35 Physical Characteristics: Contains significant tree cover in spots, environmental features, Berry Creek floodplain, and some significant historical features. Surrounding Properties: Planning Department Staff Report Three Forks 2015 PUD release (CPA) Page 2 of 3 The surrounding properties, most of which are in the ETJ, are primarily low-density residential to the west with an occasional non-residential property along Airport Road. Near the south end of the property is the Georgetown Municipal Airport, and additional land planned for future employment/industrial uses. The north borders Berry Creek and to the east are properties fronting I-35 and planned for future commercial uses. The property is unique in that it physically touches only one other parcel that is not divided by a roadway or water feature. Property History In December 2006, the City Council adopted the annexation of the land, with the zoning to the Planned Unit Development approved in February of 2008. It is remained in agriculture use since that time. The home site is presently outside of the city limits and will remain in the ETJ at least through this zoning process. 2030 Plan Analysis The property is classified as Moderate Density Residential and Employment Center. Some discussion with the applicant and City staff has been ongoing, primarily pertaining to the City’s desire to retain large areas of land to promote for business uses and increase the employment base in Georgetown. The area between I-35 and Airport Road is one of those areas, considering the proximity to the airport, City utilities, great access to the major highways, developable land, and large tracts. The City Council recently approved approximately 70 acres of this employment center land for retail use. The City’s comprehensive plan vision for the area near the Airport is for employers, manufacturing, airport-associated businesses and other commercial and industrial development. The goal is find compatible uses to the airport that don’t mind airplane noise, heavy trucks, and potential sights and smells that may conflict with a residential area. Staff has shared some of these concerns with the developer. A compromise was made to pursue an immediate land use and zoning adjustment for a small portion of the land, and continue to discuss the balance of the property within the context of a planned unit development that would serve the interests of both the developer and the city. A future consideration of land and use zoning on 70+ acres to the south will likely take place in 2015. The property is currently classified as Growth Tier 1 on the City’s Growth Tier Plan, meaning that utilities and infrastructure are planned for this area in the 10-year CIP, and this property has major infrastructure needed for the long-term development of the area. Utilities Water, wastewater and electric will be provided by Georgetown Utility Systems (GUS). Discussions are ongoing regarding wastewater service and the optimal solution and timing for the provision of wastewater to the project. This property borders the location where the proposed Berry Creek Interceptor would be built to eventually relieve the plant Planning Department Staff Report Three Forks 2015 PUD release (CPA) Page 3 of 3 at Berry Creek, just north of the site. Transportation The project is served by several major roadways, including Airport Road, I-35 and an eventual roadway south towards the I-35 and 130 interchange. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was done in 2008 that will need to be revised since the density is projected to be reduced. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the comprehensive plan amendment. Public Comments A total of 23 notices were sent out to property owners in the city limits and ETJ within 200 feet of the proposed project. Public notice was posted in the Sun newspaper on November 30, 2014. There were no comments received as of the writing of this report. Attachments Exhibit 1 – Location Map Exhibit 2 – Future Land Use Map Exhibit 3 – Zoning Map Exhibit 4 – Aerial Map (2012) Proposed Future Land Use Amendment CITY OF GEORGETOWN G e o r g e t o w n E T J GeorgetownETJ Georgetown ETJ B E R R Y CREEK DR N IH 35 NB BRIAR C R E S T DR O A K T R EEDR C H A M P I O N S D R BERRYCREEKDR N IH 35 FWY NB LAQUI N T A D R NIH35SB W H A L M A R D R C OR S A I R D R MORN I N G DOVE B L V D S H 1 9 5 W B SH 195 S H 1 9 5 E B C A D I Z C T T E R M I N A L D R S P A N I S H D O V E C T S H 1 9 5 BER R Y C V BARCELONADR PILOT PL EXIT 264 SB P A L O D U R O C T S T E A R M A N D R VORTAC LN WILLIAMSCOTSMAN I N D I A N M O U N D R D E XIT 4 1 1 N B H A L M A R C V EXIT 265 SB ENTR 266 SB ENTR265NB S E RVI C E D R C A V U R D A V I A T I O N D R S H 1 9 5 R A M P MARKETST EXIT266NB ENTR266SB ENTR265NB B R A N G U S R D A I R PO RT RD AIRPORT RD WING FOOT CV L I T T L E D E E R T R L D I A M O N D D O V E T R L B U M B L E B E E D R S H 130 T O L L N B SH 130TOLLNB N P O P P Y H I L L S C V S H130NB D R I F T I N G M E A D O W D R H A Z E L T I N E DR D E E R TRL S H 130 T O L L S B SH 130TOLL SB TO N K OWATR L REZ-2 014-029 REZ-2014-029 Exhibit #1 Co ordinate System : Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only 0 2,000 4,000Feet ¯ LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ A i r p o rtRd §¨¦35¬«195 §¨¦35 Site City Lim its Street Site ³ Airport Rd CITYOFGEORGETOWN CITYOFGEO R G E T O W N G e o r g e t o w n E T J GeorgetownETJ Georgetown ETJ O A K T R E E D R C H A M P I O N S D R B E R R Y C R E E K D R N IH 35 SBCAVURD S I E R R A D R C OR S A I R D R L O G A N R D NIH 35NB KINGSWAYRD S H 1 9 5 W B B O S QUETRL SH 195 SANA L O M A DR S H 1 9 5 E B S A W GRASST R L S T A N D R E W S D R S H 130 N B BER R YCV PILOT PL VORTAC LN C R 1 5 0 O W L C R E E K D R I N D I A N M O U N D R D H A L M A R C V N IH 35 FWY SB EXIT 268 NB ENTR265NB HACI E N D A L N S E RVI C E D R A V I A T I O N D R EXIT 265 SB S H 1 9 5 R A M P NIH35FWYNB EXIT266NB N IH 35 NB N IH 35 SB MARKETST ENTR266SB S H 1 9 5 ENTR265NB B R A N G U S R D B R I A R C RESTDR A I R P O R T R D AIRPORT RD D I A M O N D D O V E T R L B U M B L E B E E D R T O L EDO TRL S H 130NB O A KMONT DR H A Z E L T I N E DR S H 130 T O L L N B SH 130TOLL NB S H 130 T O L L S B DEER T R L TON K OWA T R L REZ-2 014-029 0 2,000 4,000Feet Co ordinate System : Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only ¯ LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ Future Land Use / Overall Transportation Plan Exhibit #2REZ-2014-029 Legend Thoroughfare Future Land Use Institutional Regional Com mercial Community Com mercial Employment Center Low Density Residential Mining Mixed Use Com munity Mixed Use Neighborhood Center Moderate Density Residential Open Space Specialty Mixed Use Area Ag / Rural Residential AirportRd A i r p o rtRd ¬«195 §¨¦35 Site ³ City Lim its Street Site Existing Collector Existing Freeway Existing Major Arterial Existing Minor Arterial Existing Ramp Proposed Collector Proposed Freeway Propsed Frontage Road Proposed Major Arterial Proposed Minor Arterial Proposed Railroad High Density Residential CITYOFGEORGETOWN CITY OF GEORGETOWN REZ-2 014-029 O A K T R E E D R C H A M P I O N S D R BERRYCREEKDR L A Q U I N T A D R B E R R Y C R E E K D R N IH 35 SB C IM ARRONLN S I E R R A D R C OR S A I R D R N IH 35 FWY SB S H 1 9 5 W B B OSQUETRL SH 195 NIH 35NB SANA L O M A DR S H 1 9 5 E B S A W GRASST R L S H 130 N B PILOT PL S H 130 S B N IH 35 FWY NB VORTAC LN ENTR 265 NB EXIT265SB O W L C R E E K D R I N D I A N M O U N D R D H A L M A R C V KIN G S W A YRD S ER V I C E D R A V I A T I O N D R EXIT 265 SB S H 1 9 5 R A M P C A V U R D MARKET ST EXIT266NB N IH 35 NB S H 1 9 5 N IH 35 SB ENTR266SB ENTR265NB B R A N G U S R D B R I A R C RESTDR A I R PO RT RD AIRPORT RD D I A M O N D D O V E T R L B U M B L E B E E D R T OLEDO TRL O A KMONT DR H A Z E L T I N E DR H A C IE N D ALN S H 130 T O L L N B SH 130TOLL NB S H 130 T O L L S B DE ER T R L TO N KOWAT RL Zoning InformationREZ-2014-029Exhibit #3 ¯ Co ordinate System : Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only 0 2,000 4,000 Feet LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ AirportRd ¬«195 §¨¦35 §¨¦35 ³ Site REZ-2014-029 O A K T R E E D R B R A N G U S R D C H A M PIO N S D R L A Q U I N T A D R AIRPORT RD N IH 35 SB C A V U R D CIMARRON LNSIERRA DR TAOS CT C OR S A I R D R BERRY CREEK DR C A D I Z C T B U M B L E B E E D R D I A M O N D D O V E T R L SABINAS CT TOLEDO TRL N IH 35 FWY SB BE R R Y C V PILOT PL B R I A R C R E S T D R P A L O D U R O C T N IH 35 NB EXIT 265 NB S T E A R M A N D R H A N G A R D R S H 1 9 5 W B N IH 35 FWY NB S Q U I R R E L H O L L O W D R S H 130 T O LL N B O W L C R E E K D R I N D I A N M O U N D R D SERENADA DR EXIT 268 NB E X IT 4 1 1 N B S A N A L O M A D R H A L M A R C V SAWGRASS TRL S H 130 S B CIELO DR EXIT 264 SB E N T R 411 S B S H 1 9 5 H A Z E L T I N E D R S H 1 9 5 E B H A C I E N D A L N SERVICE DR A V I A T I O N D R EXIT 265 SB S H 1 9 5 R A M P VORTAC LN EXIT 265 SB EXIT 266 NB MARKET ST S H 130 N B ENTR 266 SB SH 130 TOLL SB ENTR 265 NB DEER TRL TONKO WA TRL LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ Co ordinate System : Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only ¯ 0 2,000 4,000Feet Exhibit #4REZ-2014-029 195 A i r p o rtRd §¨¦35 Site City Lim its Street Site ³ AirportRd Date: November 19, 2014 Scale: 1" = 600' North Q:\130003-TRIO\Cadfiles\PLANNING\Submittals\July 2014 Zoning and Comp Plan Submittal\Comp Plan Overlay November 19.dwg GEORGETOWN, TEXAS THREE FORKS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMPARISON 12006000300 SEC Planning, LLC t 512.246.7003 f 512.246.7703 www.secplanning.com info@secplanning.com Land Planning Landscape Architecture Community Branding AUSTIN, TEXAS Base mapping compiled from best available information. All map data should be considered as preliminary, in need of verification, and subject to change.This land plan is conceptual in nature and does not represent any regulatory approval.Plan is subject to change. ++ + + City of Georgetown, Texas Planning and Zoning December 16, 2014 SUBJECT: Public Hearing and possible action on a Rezoning from a Planned Unit Development (PUD) District to 250 acres of Single-family Residential (RS) District, 19.85 acres of Low-Density Multifamily (MF-1) District, and 15.89 acres of Agriculture (AG) District in the David Wright Survey for Three Forks Ranch, located near Airport Road and Brangus Road. REZ-2014-029 Jordan J. Maddox, AICP, Principal Planner ITEM SUMMARY: The proposed zoning request removes approximately 285 acres from an existing PUD, to allow the developer to pursue a more traditional single-family and multifamily project. The remainder of the existing PUD will remain planned for office, retail, and high-density residential and the applicant has indicated that further revisions to that PUD are imminent. The overall residential density will be slightly lowered from the density forecasted in the existing PUD document. Public Comments None received as of the writing of this report Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the zoning, conditional upon the approval of the separately proposed comprehensive plan amendment. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None at this time. The applicant has paid the required fees. SUBMITTED BY: Jordan Maddox ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Staff Report Backup Material Location Map Backup Material Future Land Use Map Backup Material Existing Zoning Map Backup Material Aerial Map Backup Material Proposed Zoning Boundary Exhibit Backup Material Georgetown Planning Department Staff Report Three Forks 2015 PUD release Page 1 of 4 Report Date: December 10, 2014 File No: REZ-2014-029 Project Planner: Jordan J. Maddox, AICP, Principal Planner Item Details Project Name: Three Forks Ranch Location: Airport Road Total Acreage: 285.74 acres Legal Description: 285.74 acres in the Wright Survey Applicant: Gary Newman Property Owner: Glynn Buie Contact: Gary Newman Existing Use: Agricultural Zoning: Planned Unit Development (PUD), with base districts of Residential Single-Family (RS), and Local Commercial (C-1) Proposed Zoning: Residential Single-Family (RS), Agriculture (AG), and Low-Density Multifamily (MF-1) Future Land Use: Moderate Density Residential, Employment Center Growth Tier: Tier 1 Overview of Applicant’s Request The proposed zoning request removes approximately 285 acres from an existing PUD, to allow the developer to pursue a more traditional single-family and multifamily project. The remainder of the existing PUD will remain planned for office, retail, and high-density residential and the applicant has indicated that further revisions to that PUD are imminent. The overall residential density will be slightly lowered from the density forecasted in the existing PUD document. Site Information Location: Airport Road near Berry Creek and I-35 Physical Characteristics: Contains significant tree cover in spots, environmental features, Berry Creek floodplain, and some significant historical features. Planning Department Staff Report Three Forks 2015 PUD release Page 2 of 4 Surrounding Properties: The surrounding properties, most of which are in the ETJ, are primarily low-density residential to the west with an occasional non-residential property along Airport Road. Near the south end of the property is the Georgetown Municipal Airport, and additional land planned for future employment/industrial uses. The north borders Berry Creek and to the east are properties fronting I-35 and planned for future commercial uses. The property is unique in that it physically touches only one other parcel that is not divided by a roadway or water feature. Property History In December 2006, the City Council adopted the annexation of the land, with the zoning to the Planned Unit Development approved in February of 2008. It is remained in agriculture use since that time. The home site is presently outside of the city limits and will remain in the ETJ at least through this zoning process. 2030 Plan Conformance The property is classified as Moderate Density Residential and Employment Center. Some discussion with the applicant and City staff has been ongoing, primarily pertaining to the City’s desire to retain large areas of land to promote for business uses and increase the employment base in Georgetown. There is a separate application in process that proposes an amendment to the Future Land Use Plan that would facilitate this zoning, if approved. The property is currently classified as Growth Tier 1 on the City’s Growth Tier Plan, meaning that utilities and infrastructure are planned for this area in the 10-year CIP, and this property has major infrastructure needed for the long-term development of the area. Proposed Zoning The PUD document consisted of development standards that were designed to include new urbanism principles, both within the residential and non-residential areas. The single- family homes included some varied setback and lot size differences but generally were in conformance with the base zoning district that is being proposed to govern. The RS District allows single-family only, with a minimum lot size of 5,500 square feet. The density forecasted by the developer is less dense on an overall basis than the residential units allowed by the 2008 PUD. The MF-1, Low-Density Multifamily was recently created by the City to allow for small apartments and condominium detached single-family units on a single lot, up to a density of 14 units per acre. The remaining agriculture zoning is at the request of the existing owner, who desires additional property for agriculture use while he remains a resident on the land. The anticipation by the developer is that this property will eventually be folded into the larger development. Planning Department Staff Report Three Forks 2015 PUD release Page 3 of 4 Approximately 70 additional acres will remain within the original PUD that created in 2008. This land was projected for office, commercial, high-density residential and civic uses at the time, with strict controls on design and density. The developer of Three Forks (which may soon be renamed) has indicated to staff that a revision to the PUD document on the remainder of the property is likely in 2015. Staff anticipates that the revised PUD would seek to further the City’s goals for employment center development, while offering the developer some flexibility to adapt to a changing marketplace as the area begins to develop with additional non-residential uses. Utilities Water, wastewater and electric will be provided by Georgetown Utility Systems (GUS). Discussions are ongoing regarding wastewater service and the optimal solution and timing for the provision of wastewater to the project. This property borders the location where the proposed Berry Creek Interceptor would be built to eventually relieve the plant at Berry Creek, just north of the site. Transportation The project is served by several major roadways, including Airport Road, I-35 and an eventual roadway south towards the I-35 and 130 interchange. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was done in 2008 that will need to be revised since the density is projected to be reduced. Future Application(s) Preliminary and Final Plats will be necessary for each phase of development, per UDC regulations and Site Plans will be required for non-residential and multifamily development. Building permits will be required for all building construction. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the zoning. Inter Departmental, Governmental and Agency Comments None Public Comments A total of 9 notices were sent out to property owners in the city limits within 200 feet of the proposed project. Public notice was posted in the Sun newspaper on November 30, 2014. There were no comments received as of the writing of this report. Planning Department Staff Report Three Forks 2015 PUD release Page 4 of 4 Attachments Exhibit 1 – Location Map Exhibit 2 – Future Land Use Map Exhibit 3 – Zoning Map Exhibit 4 – Aerial Map (2012) Proposed Zoning Boundary Exhibit CITY OF GEORGETOWN G e o r g e t o w n E T J GeorgetownETJ Georgetown ETJ B E R R Y CREEK DR N IH 35 NB BRIAR C R E S T DR O A K T R EEDR C H A M P I O N S D R BERRYCREEKDR N IH 35 FWY NB LAQUI N T A D R NIH35SB W H A L M A R D R C OR S A I R D R MORN I N G DOVE B L V D S H 1 9 5 W B SH 195 S H 1 9 5 E B C A D I Z C T T E R M I N A L D R S P A N I S H D O V E C T S H 1 9 5 BER R Y C V BARCELONADR PILOT PL EXIT 264 SB P A L O D U R O C T S T E A R M A N D R VORTAC LN WILLIAMSCOTSMAN I N D I A N M O U N D R D E XIT 4 1 1 N B H A L M A R C V EXIT 265 SB ENTR 266 SB ENTR265NB S E RVI C E D R C A V U R D A V I A T I O N D R S H 1 9 5 R A M P MARKETST EXIT266NB ENTR266SB ENTR265NB B R A N G U S R D A I R PO RT RD AIRPORT RD WING FOOT CV L I T T L E D E E R T R L D I A M O N D D O V E T R L B U M B L E B E E D R S H 130 T O L L N B SH 130TOLLNB N P O P P Y H I L L S C V S H130NB D R I F T I N G M E A D O W D R H A Z E L T I N E DR D E E R TRL S H 130 T O L L S B SH 130TOLL SB TO N K OWATR L REZ-2 014-029 REZ-2014-029 Exhibit #1 Co ordinate System : Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only 0 2,000 4,000Feet ¯ LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ A i r p o rtRd §¨¦35¬«195 §¨¦35 Site City Lim its Street Site ³ Airport Rd CITYOFGEORGETOWN CITYOFGEO R G E T O W N G e o r g e t o w n E T J GeorgetownETJ Georgetown ETJ O A K T R E E D R C H A M P I O N S D R B E R R Y C R E E K D R N IH 35 SBCAVURD S I E R R A D R C OR S A I R D R L O G A N R D NIH 35NB KINGSWAYRD S H 1 9 5 W B B O S QUETRL SH 195 SANA L O M A DR S H 1 9 5 E B S A W GRASST R L S T A N D R E W S D R S H 130 N B BER R YCV PILOT PL VORTAC LN C R 1 5 0 O W L C R E E K D R I N D I A N M O U N D R D H A L M A R C V N IH 35 FWY SB EXIT 268 NB ENTR265NB HACI E N D A L N S E RVI C E D R A V I A T I O N D R EXIT 265 SB S H 1 9 5 R A M P NIH35FWYNB EXIT266NB N IH 35 NB N IH 35 SB MARKETST ENTR266SB S H 1 9 5 ENTR265NB B R A N G U S R D B R I A R C RESTDR A I R P O R T R D AIRPORT RD D I A M O N D D O V E T R L B U M B L E B E E D R T O L EDO TRL S H 130NB O A KMONT DR H A Z E L T I N E DR S H 130 T O L L N B SH 130TOLL NB S H 130 T O L L S B DEER T R L TON K OWA T R L REZ-2 014-029 0 2,000 4,000Feet Co ordinate System : Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only ¯ LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ Future Land Use / Overall Transportation Plan Exhibit #2REZ-2014-029 Legend Thoroughfare Future Land Use Institutional Regional Com mercial Community Com mercial Employment Center Low Density Residential Mining Mixed Use Com munity Mixed Use Neighborhood Center Moderate Density Residential Open Space Specialty Mixed Use Area Ag / Rural Residential AirportRd A i r p o rtRd ¬«195 §¨¦35 Site ³ City Lim its Street Site Existing Collector Existing Freeway Existing Major Arterial Existing Minor Arterial Existing Ramp Proposed Collector Proposed Freeway Propsed Frontage Road Proposed Major Arterial Proposed Minor Arterial Proposed Railroad High Density Residential CITYOFGEORGETOWN CITY OF GEORGETOWN REZ-2 014-029 O A K T R E E D R C H A M P I O N S D R BERRYCREEKDR L A Q U I N T A D R B E R R Y C R E E K D R N IH 35 SB C IM ARRONLN S I E R R A D R C OR S A I R D R N IH 35 FWY SB S H 1 9 5 W B B OSQUETRL SH 195 NIH 35NB SANA L O M A DR S H 1 9 5 E B S A W GRASST R L S H 130 N B PILOT PL S H 130 S B N IH 35 FWY NB VORTAC LN ENTR 265 NB EXIT265SB O W L C R E E K D R I N D I A N M O U N D R D H A L M A R C V KIN G S W A YRD S ER V I C E D R A V I A T I O N D R EXIT 265 SB S H 1 9 5 R A M P C A V U R D MARKET ST EXIT266NB N IH 35 NB S H 1 9 5 N IH 35 SB ENTR266SB ENTR265NB B R A N G U S R D B R I A R C RESTDR A I R PO RT RD AIRPORT RD D I A M O N D D O V E T R L B U M B L E B E E D R T OLEDO TRL O A KMONT DR H A Z E L T I N E DR H A C IE N D ALN S H 130 T O L L N B SH 130TOLL NB S H 130 T O L L S B DE ER T R L TO N KOWAT RL Zoning InformationREZ-2014-029Exhibit #3 ¯ Co ordinate System : Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only 0 2,000 4,000 Feet LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ AirportRd ¬«195 §¨¦35 §¨¦35 ³ Site REZ-2014-029 O A K T R E E D R B R A N G U S R D C H A M PIO N S D R L A Q U I N T A D R AIRPORT RD N IH 35 SB C A V U R D CIMARRON LNSIERRA DR TAOS CT C OR S A I R D R BERRY CREEK DR C A D I Z C T B U M B L E B E E D R D I A M O N D D O V E T R L SABINAS CT TOLEDO TRL N IH 35 FWY SB BE R R Y C V PILOT PL B R I A R C R E S T D R P A L O D U R O C T N IH 35 NB EXIT 265 NB S T E A R M A N D R H A N G A R D R S H 1 9 5 W B N IH 35 FWY NB S Q U I R R E L H O L L O W D R S H 130 T O LL N B O W L C R E E K D R I N D I A N M O U N D R D SERENADA DR EXIT 268 NB E X IT 4 1 1 N B S A N A L O M A D R H A L M A R C V SAWGRASS TRL S H 130 S B CIELO DR EXIT 264 SB E N T R 411 S B S H 1 9 5 H A Z E L T I N E D R S H 1 9 5 E B H A C I E N D A L N SERVICE DR A V I A T I O N D R EXIT 265 SB S H 1 9 5 R A M P VORTAC LN EXIT 265 SB EXIT 266 NB MARKET ST S H 130 N B ENTR 266 SB SH 130 TOLL SB ENTR 265 NB DEER TRL TONKO WA TRL LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ Co ordinate System : Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only ¯ 0 2,000 4,000Feet Exhibit #4REZ-2014-029 195 A i r p o rtRd §¨¦35 Site City Lim its Street Site ³ AirportRd Date: November 19, 2014 Scale: 1" = 600' North Q:\130003-TRIO\Cadfiles\PLANNING\Submittals\July 2014 Zoning and Comp Plan Submittal\Zoning Boundary Exhibit-Revised November 19.dwg GEORGETOWN, TEXAS THREE FORKS ZONING EXHIBIT 12006000300 SEC Planning, LLC t 512.246.7003 f 512.246.7703 www.secplanning.com info@secplanning.com Land Planning Landscape Architecture Community Branding AUSTIN, TEXAS Base mapping compiled from best available information. All map data should be considered as preliminary, in need of verification, and subject to change.This land plan is conceptual in nature and does not represent any regulatory approval.Plan is subject to change. ++ + +