HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda_P&Z_11.01.2016Notice of Meeting for the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Georgetown Nov ember 1, 2016 at 6:00 PM at 101 E. Sev enth Street, Georgetown, Texas 78626 The City o f G eo rgeto wn is committed to comp lianc e with the Americans with Dis abilities Ac t (ADA). If yo u req uire as s is tanc e in participating at a p ublic meeting d ue to a disability, as d efined und er the ADA, reas onab le as s is tance, ad ap tatio ns , or acc o mmo d ations will b e provid ed up o n req uest. P leas e c o ntact the City Sec retary's Office, at leas t three (3) days prior to the sc hed uled meeting d ate, at (512) 930-3652 o r City Hall at 113 Eas t 8th Street fo r add itional info rmation; TTY us ers ro ute through Relay Texas at 711. Regular Session (This Regular S es s io n may, at any time, b e rec es s ed to convene an Exec utive S es s io n fo r any p urpose authorized b y the Op en Meetings Act, Texas Go vernment Co d e 551.) A Call to Order Pledge of Allegiance Comments from the Chair - Welcome and Meeting P ro cedures Action from Executive Session B As of the d ead line, no persons were signed up to s peak on items other than thos e p o s ted o n the agend a. Consent Agenda The Statutory Cons ent Agenda inc ludes non-c o ntro versial and ro utine items that may be acted up o n with one s ingle vo te. An item may b e pulled from the Cons ent Agenda in o rd er that it b e dis c us sed and acted up o n individ ually as part of the Regular Agenda. C Co nsideration of the Minutes from the O c to b er 18, 2016 P&Z meeting. Step hanie Mc Nic kle, Recording Secretary Legislativ e Regular Agenda D Public Hearing and p o s s ib le ac tion on a reques t to Rezone approximately 75.415 ac res of the David Wright s urvey loc ated at 2101 Airport Road fro m C-3 General Commerc ial to IN Ind ustrial. (REZ-2016- 030) So fia Nels on, Planning Direc tor E Public Hearing and possible actio n o n a req ues t to Rezone 3.5 acres of San Gabriel Estates, Bloc k 1, Lo t 22A lo c ated at 700 Booty's Crossing R o ad from the Agriculture (AG) Dis trict to the Neighborhood Co mmerc ial (C N) District. (REZ-2016-024, F aith Impac t Churc h) Juan Enriquez, Planner F Public Hearing and possible actio n o n a req ues t to Rezone ap p ro ximately 83.5 acres in the W. Ro berts Survey loc ated north o f F airway Lane and s outh of Shell Ro ad , fro m the Agriculture (AG) Dis tric t to the Res id ential Single-F amily (RS ) and Lo cal C o mmercial (C-1) Dis tric ts. (REZ-2016-025, Hidden Oaks at Page 1 of 88 Berry Creek) C aro lyn Ho rner, AICP, Planner G Public Hearing and possible actio n o n a req ues t to Rezone ap p ro ximately 10.058 acres in the Franc es A Hudson Survey loc ated at 555 Rabbit Hill Road fro m the Agriculture (AG) Dis trict to the Busines s Park (BP) Dis tric t. (REZ-2016-026, Enterprise P ip eline) H Public Hearing and possible actio n o n a req ues t to Rezone Lot 1, Bloc k F, S ummit at Rivery Park Phases 5 & 6, lo cated at 1101 Woodlawn Avenue to amend the Summit at Rivery Park P lanned Unit Development (P UD) Dis tric t. (REZ-2016--027, Sheraton Georgetown) Valerie Kreger, AICP, Principal Planner I Public Hearing and possible actio n o n a req ues t to Rezone ap p ro ximately 165.65 acres d es cribed as 142.80 acres in the N. P o rter and A. Flores S urveys, 0.68 acres, 5.07 ac res , and 12.31 acres in the N. Po rter Survey, and 4.79 ac res , b eing Bloc ks 1-3 o f the North Geo rgetown Ad d ition, lo cated between Austin Ave. and N. College S t. south of F M 971, fro m the Residential S ingle-Family (RS) and Loc al Co mmerc ial (C -1) Districts to the Pub lic F ac ilities (P F) District. (REZ-2016--029, S an Gab riel Park) Valerie Kreger, AIC P, P rinc ip al Planner J Pres entatio n and d is cus s io n o n Williams Drive Study. Jo rd an J. Maddox, AIC P, P rinc ip al P lanner K Dis cus s ion and pos s ible actio n regarding the p o tential Planning and Zoning meeting s ched ule fo r the 2017 c alendar year. L Dis cus s ion Items : Update on the Unified Development C o d e Advis o ry Committee (UDC AC ) meetings . (Commis s ioner Bargainer) Update on the Geo rgeto wn Transp o rtatio n Ad visory Board (GTAB) meetings . Ques tio ns o r c o mments from Commis s io ners-in-Training about the ac tio ns and matters c o nsidered on this agenda. Jo int GTAB and P&Z meeting November 15, 2016 Remind er of the next P lanning and Zoning Co mmis s io n meeting on December 6, 2016 at Counc il Chamb ers loc ated at 101 East 7th Street, s tarting at 6:00 p m. Adjournment CERTIFICATE OF POSTING I, Shelley No wling, C ity S ecretary fo r the C ity of Geo rgeto wn, Texas , d o hereby c ertify that this Notice of Meeting was p o s ted at City Hall, 113 E. 8th Street, a p lace read ily acc es s ible to the general p ublic at all times , on the ______ d ay o f __________________, 2016, at __________, and remained so p o s ted fo r at leas t 72 c o ntinuo us ho urs p receding the sc heduled time o f s aid meeting. ____________________________________ S helley No wling, City Sec retary Page 2 of 88 City of Georgetown, Texas Planning and Zoning November 1, 2016 SUBJECT: Cons id eration o f the Minutes fro m the October 18, 2016 P &Z meeting. Stephanie McNickle, Rec o rd ing Sec retary ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: NA SUBMITTED BY: ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Draft Minutes from the October 18th P&Z meeting.Cover Memo Page 3 of 88 P&Z Minutes Page 1 of 2 October 18, 2016 City of Georgetown, Texas Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes Tuesday, October 18, 2016 at 6:00 PM Council and Courts Building 101 East 7th Street, Georgetown, Texas 78626 Commissioners: Josh Schroeder, Chair; Kevin Pitts, Vice-Chair, Vacant, Secretary; Andy Webb, Tim Bargainer and Alex Fuller Commissioner(s) Absent: John Marler Commissioners in Training: Gary Leissner, Aaron Albright Commissioner(s) in Training Absent: Staff Present: Sofia Nelson, Planning Director; Jordan Maddox, Principal Planner Juan Enriquez, Planner and Stephanie McNickle, Recording Secretary. A. Chair Schroeder called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. and lead the Pledge of Allegiance. Chair Schroeder stated the order of the meeting and that those who speak must turn in a speaker form to the recording secretary before the item that they wish to address begins. Each speaker is permitted to address the Commission once for each item, for a maximum of three (3) minutes, unless otherwise agreed to before the meeting begins. B. As of the deadline for this agenda, no persons were signed up to speak on items other than what was posted on the agenda. Consent Agenda The Statutory Consent Agenda includes non-controversial and routine items that may be acted upon with one single vote. An item may be pulled from the Consent Agenda in order that it be discussed and acted upon individually as part of the Regular Agenda. C Consideration of the Minutes from the October 4, 2016 P&Z meeting. Stephanie McNickle, Recording Secretary Legislative Regular Agenda D Public Hearing and possible action on a Replat of a Final Plat for 402 Doe Run Replat, being 8.268 of Whitetail Section 2, Lot 36, located at 402 Doe Run. (FP- 2016-025, 402 Doe Run Replat) Juan Enriquez, Planner Juan Enriquez provided an overview of the Replat of a Final Plat application request and description of project. Chair Schroeder asked the applicant if he would like to speak. The applicant stated he will be glad to answer any questions. Chair Schroeder opened the Public Hearing. No one came forward the Public Page 4 of 88 P&Z Minutes Page 2 of 2 October 18, 2016 Hearing was closed. Motion by Commissioner Pitts to approve the Replat of a Final Plat for 402 Doe Run Replat, being 8.268 of Whitetail Section 2, Lot 36, located at 402 Doe Run. Second by Commissioner Fuller. Approved. (5-0) E Public Hearing and possible action on a Final Plat for a Replat for Teravista, Section 327, Block 2, Lots 26-29 and Block 6, Lots 1-9 and Lot 24. (FP-2016-030, Teravista) Jordan J. Maddox, AICP, Principal Planner Jordan Maddox provided an overview of the Replat of a Final Plat application request and description of project. Chair Schroeder asked the applicant if he would like to speak. The applicant stated he will be glad to answer any questions. Chair Schroeder opened the Public Hearing. No one came forward the Public Hearing was closed. Motion by Commissioner Pitts to approve the Final Plat for a Replat for Teravista, Section 327, Block 2, Lots 26-29 and Block 6, Lots 1-9 and Lot 24. Second by Commissioner Webb. Approved. (5-0) F Discussion Items: • 2017 Planning and Zoning Meeting Calendar • Update on the Williams Drive Study – Jordan Maddox • Update on the Unified Development Code Advisory Committee (UDCAC) meetings. - Commissioner Bargainer • Update on the Georgetown Transportation Advisory Board (GTAB) meetings. • Questions or comments from Commissioners-in-Training about the actions and matters considered on this agenda. • Reminder of the next Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on November 1, 2016 at Council Chambers located at 101 East 7th Street, starting at 6:00 pm. Motion to Adjourn at 6:11 p.m. ____________________________________ ____________________________________ Josh Schroeder, Chair P&Z Commissioner Page 5 of 88 City of Georgetown, Texas Planning and Zoning November 1, 2016 SUBJECT: Pub lic Hearing and pos s ible actio n o n a reques t to R ezo ne ap p ro ximately 75.415 acres o f the David Wright s urvey lo cated at 2101 Airport Ro ad from C -3 General Commerc ial to IN Ind us trial. (REZ-2016-030) Sofia Nelson, P lanning Directo r ITEM SUMMARY: Background: The applic ant has req uested to rezo ne the s ite from the General Commerc ial (C3) Dis trict to the Ind ustrial (IN) District. Public Comment: To d ate, no written pub lic comments have been received . FINANCIAL IMPACT: n/a SUBMITTED BY: Sofia Nelson, C NU-A, P lanning Directo r ATTACHMENTS: Description Type zoning map Backup Material future land us e map Backup Material Staff Report Backup Material us es allowed in IN zoning Backup Material Page 6 of 88 LAKEWAYDR A I R P O R T R D ")SP U R158 Zon in g Inf ormationREZ-2 016-0 30Exhibit #3 Co ord inate System: Texas Sta te Plane/Centra l Zone/NAD 83/U S FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purp oses Only Le ge n dSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ ¯ 0 ¼½¾MiPage 7 of 88 LAKEWAYDR S H A D Y H O L L O W D R AZALEA DR L A Z Y R D L U N A T R L VORTAC LN CALADIUM DR C A L A D I U M C T B I S O N D R JUNIPER DR C O R D O B A C I R W E L K D R WINDMILL CV WRIGHT BROTHERS DR E A S T D R CANYON RD H A L M A R C V S E R V I C E D R A S P E N T R L O S A G E C T I N D U S T R I A L P A R K C I R H I C K O R Y T R E E D R CRYSTALLKNOLL B LV D W HISPEROAKS LN S H A N G A R D R S T E A R M A N D R D O G W O O D D R M A H O G A N Y L N C O U G A R D R PILOT PL L O N NIE T H O M A SD R O R A N G E T R E E L N E V E R G R E E N C I R C H A N C E T R L WILLIAM SCOTSMAN D E L P R A D O L N J E F F E R S O N L N C A V U R D B A R B E R R Y D R CO RS A I R D R I R I S D R J A S M I N E T R L")SPUR158 T O L E D O T R L K L E I N C T W I S T E R I A D R T E J A N O C T CACTU STR L L O R I L N A I R P O R T R D S T A D I U M D R C A V U R D G R A N A D A D R A E R O D R GOLDEN OAKS RD N AUSTIN AVE A I R P O R T R D S E R V I C E D R I N D U S T R I A L P A R K C I R L A K E W A Y DR S T A D I U M D R C R 1 5 2 CAVU RD C R 1 5 2 CIE L O D R NEINNERLOOP SABINAS CT MARI-POSA CT C A S A BLANCA BO S Q U E T R L C ORDOBA CIR E SE R V I C E D R T E R M I N A L D R H A N G A R R D SUDDUTH D R A V I A T I O N D R !(130 Coo rd inate Sys tem: Te xas S tate Plane/C entral Zone/N AD 83/U S FeetCartographic D ata Fo r General Planning Purposes O nly ¯ Future Land Use / Overall Transportation Plan Exhi bit #2 REZ-20 16 -03 0 Legend Thoroughfare Future Land Use Institutional Regi onal Commercial Community Commerc ial Em ployment Center Low Dens ity Residential Mining Mix ed Us e Community Mix ed Us e Neighborhood Center Moderate Density Residential Open Space Specialty Mixed Us e Area Ag / Rural Residential Ex isting Collector Ex isting Freeway Ex isting Major Arterial Ex isting Minor Arterial Ex isting Ramp Pr oposed Collector Pr oposed Freeway Pr opsed Frontage Road Pr oposed Major Arterial Pr oposed Minor Arterial Pr oposed Railroad High Density Residential 0 ¼½¾Mi Le ge ndSi teParcelsCity Lim itsGeorgetown ETJ Page 8 of 88 Georgetown Planning Department Staff Report Carlson Tract Rezoning Page 1 of 5 Report Date: October 9, 2016 File No: REZ-2016-030 Project Planner: Sofia Nelson, Planning Director Item Details Project Name: Project Cat Project Address: 2101 Airport Road Total Acreage: 75.415 acres Applicant: Randy Mongold Property Owner(s): Kenneth A. Garrett Contact: Randy Mongold Overview of Applicant’s Request The applicant has requested to rezone the site from the General Commercial (C3) District to the Industrial (IN) District. Site Information Location: This property is located just north of the intersection of Airport Road and Lakeway Drive, with frontage on both Airport Road and IH 35. Physical Characteristics: The property is relatively flat with few trees. No decerable physical characteristics. Surrounding Properties: The majority of the immediately surrounding property is undeveloped, except a residence next door to this tract and the city’s Airport across Airport Road. Page 9 of 88 Planning Department Staff Report Project Cat zoning Page 2 of 5 Location Zoning Future Land Use Existing Use North AG Employment Center, Regional Commercial rural residential and undeveloped property South C-3 Employment Center, Community Commercial undeveloped East IH35 Employment Center, Regional Commercial Interstate highway West IN(PUD) Institutional Georgetown Airport Property History The subject property was annexed in November of 2006 and assigned Agriculture zoning, the default zoning district for annexations. In 2014 the subject property was rezoned from the interim zoning district of Agriculture to the current C-3 zoning. 2030 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use: The 2030 Plan provides for a Regional Commercial node at the intersection of the SH 130 Tollroad and IH 35 and a Community Commercial node at the intersection of the Northeast Innerloop and IH 35, all surrounded by the Employment Center land use category. Individually, this tract is primarily shown as Employment Center, with the northeastern portion extending into the Regional Commercial node. The Employment Center land use designation is intended for tracts of undeveloped land located at strategic locations, which are designated for well planned, larger scale employment and business activities, as well as supporting uses such as retail, services, hotels, and high density residential development (stand-alone or in mixed-use buildings) as a conditional use. Many Employment Center designations will include undeveloped properties identified by the City as opportunity sites for centers of commerce or employment. These sites may be acquired and developed through public-private partnerships. Primary uses include offices, flex offices, and technology research and development, as well as environmentally friendly manufacturing. These uses should be encouraged to develop in a campus-like setting with generous, linked open space to maximize value, promote visual quality, and encourage pedestrian activity between employment areas and areas of supporting uses such as retail, restaurants, and residential. Page 10 of 88 Planning Department Staff Report Project Cat zoning Page 3 of 5 Growth Tier: The 2030 Plan Growth Tier Map designation is Tier 1B, which is the portion of the City or extra- territorial jurisdiction (ETJ) where growth and the provision of public facilities are anticipated within 10 years following the adoption of the 2030 Plan. Transportation This parcel has direct frontage on both Airport Road, an existing Minor Arterial on the city’s Thoroughfare Plan, and to IH 35. GTEC is considering a design task order in October to widen Airport Road from 2 to 5 lanes (inclusive of a center turn lane) and a slight realignment at the intersection of Lakeway Blvd to promote better traffic flow (inclusive of a traffic signal). Design should be complete in the spring of 2017. The project will require ROW acquisition which is difficult to time. However, construction could start as early as FY 2017.Additionally, an OTP map amendment is being processed to remove a portion of a collector level roadway that bisects this property. The amendment is scheduled for review by the Planning Commission in December Utilities The City of Georgetown will provide water, wastewater and electric services at this location. Page 11 of 88 Planning Department Staff Report Project Cat zoning Page 4 of 5 Proposed Zoning District The Industrial District (IN) is intended to provide a location for manufacturing and industrial activities that may generate some nuisances. Traffic generation will likely include heavy vehicles, making access to an arterial or freeway necessary. Unless separated by a major roadway, the Industrial District is not appropriate adjacent to any residential uses. Staff Analysis The subject property is located along the northern portion of the City’s I-35 corridor, a portion which is largely undeveloped and planned as an employment center district. The rezoning of the project is in keeping with the location goals for Industrial zoning by having direct access to I-35 and Airport Road, an arterial level roadway. Additionally, given the property’s location near the Georgetown Municipal Airport, the future transportation improvements, and the designation of this area as an employment center, the rezoning of this property is working in concert with the 2030 vision and the pending public improvements to develop this area in a manner that supports and creates employment opportunities that may be most suitable with direct freeway frontage. UDC Section 3.06.030 establishes the following criteria for zoning changes: The application is complete and the information contained within the application is sufficient and correct enough to allow adequate review and final action This application was reviewed by staff and deemed to be complete. The zoning change is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan The proposed zoning change is consistent with the Future Land Use of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and the Plan’s Goal of preserving and emphasizing land ideally suited for employment uses. The zoning change promotes the health, safety or general welfare of the City and the safe orderly, and healthful development of the City The zoning change from General Commercial to Industrial allows for an employment center district to be developed as originally envisioned. It allows for industrial type uses and development to occur in an area that has direct access to I-35 and, with its adjacency to undeveloped property, overtime has the ability to bring the vision of an employment center to fruition. The zoning change is compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood The proposed rezoning is compatible with the surrounding zoning districts, specifically those located to the south and west of the site. The property to be rezoned is suitable for uses permitted by the District that would be applied by the proposed amendment. The uses allowed in the IN District are appropriate at this location given the vision for this area in the adopted 2030 Plan. Page 12 of 88 Planning Department Staff Report Project Cat zoning Page 5 of 5 Findings Based on all the information presented, staff has made the following findings: 1. The Future Land Use category of Employment Center supports the IN District at this location since this category is intended for large tracts of undeveloped open land where supporting uses such as retail, services, hotels, and high density residential development are conditionally supported. The Commercial property to the south and the community commercial node to the north will allow for the commercial uses that may support the employment center node. 2. The city is developed with stable neighborhoods and commercial areas; however, industrially zoned property and development of key employments center districts are essential to providing a variety of employment opportunities and land uses within the Georgetown Community. 3. The uses allowed in the IN District are appropriate at this location given the property’s location within a gateway overlay district will require stricter site and building requirements. 4. The location of the subject property along I-35 and Airport Road (with improvements to the Airport Road and Lakeway Intersection) allows for the development of this tract in a manner that supports the employmenet center vision with site and architectural standards that protect from adverse impacts potentially associated with industrial uses. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the applicant’s request based on the above-mentioned findings. Public Comments Staff has received no public comments regarding this case. Attachments Attachment 1 – Location Map Attachment 2 – Future Land Use Map Attachment 3 – Zoning Map Attachment 4 – Uses permitted in Industrial zoning Page 13 of 88 Maximum Building Height = 45 feet Front Setback = 25 feet Bufferyard = 30 feet with a fence and Side Setback = 10 feet plantings adjacent to AG, RE, RL, Side Setback to Residential = 25 feet RS, TF, MH, TH, MF-1, or MF-2 Rear Setback = 10 feet districts Rear Setback to Residential = 35 feet Allowed by Right Subject to Limitations Special Use Permit (SUP) Required Emergency Services Station Business/Trade School Correctional Facility Government/Post Office Animal Shelter Hospital Naure Presreve/Community Garden Neighborhood Public Park Psychiatric Hospital Food Catering Services Kennel Substance Abuse Clinic Athletic Facility, Indoor/Outdoor Self-Storage, Outdoor Cemetery, Columbaria, Mausoleum, Driving Range Heliport or Memorial Park Medical Complex Wireless Transmission Facility (>40')Sexually Oriented Business General Office Seasonal Product Sales Major Event Entertainment Integrated Office Center Farmer's market, Temporary Indoor Firing Range Data Center Mobile/Outdoor Food Vendor Fuel Sales Artisan Studio/Gallery Business Offices, Temporary Car Wash Small Engine Repair Concrete Products, Temporary Airport Self-Storage, Indoor Construction Field Office Wireless Transmission Facility (<41') Commercial Document Storage Construction Staging, Off-site Resource Extraction Event Catering/Equipment Rental Parking Lot, Temporary Oil Refinery/Distribution Furniture Repair/Upholstery Waste Related Uses Heavy Equipment Sales/Repair Wrecking, Scrap, Salvage yard Pest Control/Janitorial Services Office/Showroom Wholesale Showrooms Stone/Dirt/Mulch Sales Yards Manufactured Housing Sales Car Sales/Rental/Leasing Facility Car Parts/Accessories Sales, Outdoor Car Repair/Service, Limited Bus Barn Parking Lot, Off-site/Commercial Park-n-Ride Facility Private Transport Service Dispatch Facility Rail or Transit Yard Allowed by Right con't Transit Passenger Terminal Utilities (Minor, Intermediate, Major)Truck Terminal Contractor Services, Limited/General Lumber Yard Movie Production Dry Cleaning/Laundry Plant Printing/Publishing Asphalt/Concrete Batch Plant Office/Warehouse Recycling Collection Center Manufacturing, Processing and Meat Market Assembly, Limited/General Taxidermist Warehouse/Distribution, Limited/General INDUSTRIAL (IN) DISTRICT District Development Standards Specific Uses Allowed within the District Page 14 of 88 City of Georgetown, Texas Planning and Zoning November 1, 2016 SUBJECT: Public Hearing and p o s s ib le ac tion on a reques t to Rezone 3.5 ac res of S an Gab riel Es tates , Blo ck 1, Lot 22A lo cated at 700 Bo o ty's Cro s s ing Road fro m the Agric ulture (AG) Dis tric t to the Neighb o rhood Commerc ial (CN) Dis tric t. (REZ-2016-024, Faith Imp act Church) Juan Enriq uez, P lanner ITEM SUMMARY: Background: The ap p licant has reques ted to rezo ne the 3.5 ac re s ite fro m the Agric ulture (AG) Dis tric t to the Neighborho od Commerc ial (CN) District. T he p ro p erty was annexed April 22, 2003 and as s igned the d efault AG Dis tric t. The reques ted rezo ning wo uld p ro vide the property owner with p ermitted us es allowed b y the CN Dis tric t. Public comment: To date, s taff has rec eived one email and a p hone c all fro m neighbors with traffic related c oncerns . Staff als o rec eived a pho ne c all from the ab utting property o wner facing Williams Drive with c o nc erns o f how a churc h will limit c ertain us es on his property. Staff Recommendation: Staff rec o mmend s approval of the reques t to rezone the 3.5 acre trac t to the CN Dis tric t. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None studied at this time SUBMITTED BY: Juan Enriq uez, Planner, and Sofia Nelson, CNU-A, P lanning Directo r ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Staff Report Cover Memo Attachment 1 - Location Map Backup Material Attachment 2 - Future Land Us e Map Backup Material Attachment 3 - Zoning Map Backup Material Attachment 4 - CN Dis trict Development Standards and Permitted Land Us es Backup Material Page 15 of 88 Georgetown Planning Department Staff Report Faith Impact Church Rezoning Page 1 of 5 Report Date: October 26, 2016 File No: REZ-2016-024 Project Planner: Juan Enriquez, Planner Item Details Project Name: Faith Impact Church Project Address: 700 Booty’s Crossing Road Total Acreage: 3.5 acres Legal Description: San Gabriel Estates, Block 1, Lot 22A Existing Zoning: Agriculture District Proposed Zoning: Neighborhood Commercial District Overview of Applicant’s Request The applicant has requested to rezone the 3.5 acre site from the Agriculture (AG) District to the Neighborhood Commercial (CN) District. The property was annexed April 22, 2003 and assigned the default AG District. The requested rezoning would provide the property owner with permitted uses allowed by the CN District. Site Information Location: The property is located at 700 Booty’s Crossing Road, near the southwest intersection of Williams Drive and Booty’s Crossing Road in the western portion of the City. Physical Characteristics: The platted and rectangular shaped property is 3.5 acres in size and is generally flat with various shrubs throughtout the lot. The site has approximately 245 feet of street frontage along Booty’s Crossing Road. There are several trees, including heritage trees, located on-site. A tree survey will be required upon Site Development Plan submittal to identify protected and heritage trees. Surrounding Properties: Location Zoning Future Land Use Existing Use North C-1 Mixed Use Neighborhood Center Commercial Use South RS Moderate Density Residential Single Family Residential Use East C-1 and Office Moderate Density Residential/ Mixed Use Neighborhood Center Commercial Daycare West Agriculture Moderate Density Residential Single Family Residential Use Property History The 3.5 acre platted property was annexed into the City on April 22, 2003 by Ordinance No. 2003- 34. At the time of annexation into the City, the default AG District was assigned. A single family Page 16 of 88 Planning Department Staff Report Faith Impact Church Rezoning Page 2 of 5 residence existed on this property for many years but was recently demolished due to fire damage. The property is currently vacant and undeveloped. 2030 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use: The 2030 Future Land Use category for this site is Moderate Density Residential. This land use category includes single family neighborhoods with a density ranging between 3.1 and 6 dwelling units per acre. The Comprehensive Plan also supports non-residential uses in Moderate Density Residential along major roadways such as neighborhood-serving retail, office, institutitonal and civic uses. Growth Tier: The 2030 Plan Growth Tier Map designation is Tier 1A (Developed, Redeveloping), which is the portion of the City where infrastructure systems are in place, or can be economically provided, and where the bulk of the City’s growth should be guided over the near term. Transportation The site’s primary inbound and outbound access is on Booty’s Crossing Road. Trip generation will be reviewed with the Site Development Plan application, possibly triggering the need for a TIA will be determined at that time. Booty’s Crossing Road is considered a major collector road. Utilities Water/Wastewater and Electric is served by the City of Georgetown. It is anticipated that there is adequate water capacity at this time to serve this property by existing capacity. Proposed Zoning District The applicant has requested Neighborhood Commercial (CN) zoning on this property. The CN District is intended to provide small scale office, commercial, and personal service businesses that primarily serve the adjacent residential areas. Neighborhood commercial areas are generally located within neighborhoods and have pedestrian access to adjacent residential areas. Notable Development Standards in CN District: Maximum building height 30 feet Minimum side setback to residential district 10 feet (5 foot setback when not next to residential) Bufferyard required between: • CN and AG with residential use • A 10 foot wide planting area; 2 evergreen ornamental trees and 4 evergreen shrubs per each 50 linear feet of bufferyard Maximum Impervious Cover 70% (20% maximum in AG District) Floor Area Ratio (FAR): FAR and maximum building size limitation does not Page 17 of 88 Planning Department Staff Report Faith Impact Church Rezoning Page 3 of 5 Shall not exceed 0.3 for commercial, retail, service, and office buildings. No single building can exceed 7,500 sq ft in size. apply to civic uses such as religious assembly facilities Staff Analysis As part of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan adoption process, the land use element identified a number of land use goals, policies and actions. The following goals and action statements are the most relevant to this request: The subject property is located within the Moderate Density Residential future land use category, which includes single family neighborhoods with a density ranging between 3.1 and 6 dwelling units per acre. The Comprehensive Plan also supports non-residential uses in Moderate Density Residential along major roadways such as neighborhood-serving retail, office, institutitonal and civic uses. These uses are permitted in the CN District. Booty’s Crossing Road is considered a major collector. Additionally, Goal 4 of the Comprehensive Plan says to “Maintain and strengthen viable land uses and land use patterns (e.g. stable neighborhoods, economically sound commercial and employment areas). The policies listed under this goal include minimizing impacts of encroachment by incompatible land uses. In this case, the CN District, will serve as a buffer between the more intense Office and Local Commercial zoning districts to the east of the site and the established residential neighborhoods of Falls of San Gabriel and River Bend to the west and south. For example, the C- 1 (Local Commercial) District allows full service hotels, gas stations, live music/entertainment, dance halls, car washes where the CN District does not allow these types of uses. The C-1 District also allows a higher FAR (0.5) while the buildings in the CN are limited to a maximum 7,500 square feet. However, this building size limitation does not apply to religious assembly facilities. The Office District allows medical and dental offices and the CN District does not allow them. The CN zoning district buffer will help ensure compatibility with land uses. At the same time, the CN district will provide services to the nearby neighborhoods with pedestrian access. UDC Section 3.06.030 establishes the following criteria for zoning changes: The application is complete and the information contained within the application is sufficient and correct enough to allow adequate review and final action An application must provide the necessary information to review and make a knowledgeable decision in order for staff to schedule an application for consideration by P&Z and City Council. This application was reviewed by staff and deemed to be complete. The zoning change is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan The proposed zoning change is consistent with the Future Land Use of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan as the Moderate Density Residential category allows for neighborhood serving commercial and civic development when located adjacent to a major Page 18 of 88 Planning Department Staff Report Faith Impact Church Rezoning Page 4 of 5 roadway such as Booty’s Crossing Road. The zoning change promotes the health, safety or general welfare of the City and the safe orderly, and healthful development of the City The zoning change request promotes health, safety and general welfare of the City because it minimizes impacts of encroachment by incompatible land uses since the CN District does not allow more intense uses that are permitted by right in the OF and C-1 Districts. The zoning change is compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood The proposed rezoning is compatible with the surrounding zoning districts and will provide a buffer to the nearby single family development from more intense office and commercial land uses such as hotels, live entertainment, gas stations and car washes that are permitted in the C-1 District but not in the CN District. The property to be rezoned is suitable for uses permitted by the District that would be applied by the proposed amendment. The uses allowed in the CN District are appropriate at this location since there are established neighborhoods within walking distance that can be serviced. The CN District could provide walking distance to uses such as retail, farmer’s market, bakeries, personal services. Findings Based on all the information presented, staff has made the following findings: 1. The Future Land Use category of Moderate Density Residential supports complementary non- residential uses along major roadways such as neighborhood-serving retail, office, institutional and civic uses. Booty’s Crossing Road is considered a major collector road. 2. The requested CN District is intended to provide small scale office, commercial, and personal service businesses that primarily serve the adjacent residential areas. Falls of San Gabriel neighborhood and other residential lots are located to the west and southwest of the site. The River Bend Subdivision is located across the street to the south. These neighborhoods could be served by uses permitted in the CN district. 3. The permitted land uses of the CN District are appropriate at this location since they could serve as a buffer between the more intense Office and Local Commercial zoning districts to the east from the nearby residential neighborhood. This zoning district buffer will help ensure compatibility with land uses. For example, the C-1 (Local Commercial) District allows full service hotels, gas stations, live music/entertainment, dance halls, car washes where the CN District does not allow these types of uses. The Office District allows medical and dental offices and the CN District does not allow them. 4. There is sufficient water capacity at this time to accommodate the proposed rezoning from AG to CN District at this location. Page 19 of 88 Planning Department Staff Report Faith Impact Church Rezoning Page 5 of 5 Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the applicant’s request based on the above-mentioned findings. Public Comments As required by the Unified Development Code, all property owners within a 200 foot radius of the subject property that are located within City limits were notified of the rezoning application (22 notices mailed), a legal notice advertising the public hearing was placed in the Sun Newspaper (October 16, 2016) and signs were posted on-site. To date, staff has received one email and a phone call from neighbors with traffic related concerns. Staff also received a phone call from the abutting property owner facing Williams Drive with concerns of how a church will limit certain uses on his property. Attachments Attachment 1 – Location Map Attachment 2 – Future Land Use Map Attachment 3 – Zoning Map Attachment 4 – CN District Development Standards and Permitted Land Uses Page 20 of 88 WilliamsDr W illia ms Dr Lake w ay Dr Lakeway D r DB W o o d R d Booty'sCrossingRd Shell Rd NAustinAve N A u s t i n A v e NColleg e StRiveryBlvd N A u s t i n A v e W olfRanchPkw y S eren a da D r EMorro w St N orth w estBlvd Lake w ay Dr §¨¦35 (River/ S t r e a m ) (R i v e r /St r e a m ) REZ-2016-024 Attachment 1 Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only ¯ Location Map 0 0.5 1Mi LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ Page 21 of 88 GABRIELVIEWDR B O O T Y S CROSSING RD SUT T O N P L R A N D OLPH RD W E S T W O O D L N DEE R H A V E N D R N ORTHWESTBLV D WESTE R N T R L R ID GECRESTRD POW E R R D PARKER D R PARK M E A D O W B L V D O A K L N KAT H I L N P E C A N L N MELANI E L N WAGON W HEELTRL DAWNDR S P R INGW O O D LN ME S Q U I T E L N D U N M AN DR STACEY LN JO H N T H O M A S D R NORTHCROSSRD W I N DMILL CV ME L I S S A C T C L E A R S P R I N G R D B UFFAL O S P RIN G S T R L C O T T O N W O O D D R FAIRVIE W R D P A T TI D R E RU S T L E C V KIMB E R L Y S T R I V E R B E N D D R P R I M R O S E T R L S P A N I S H O A K D R PARKLN WHITE TAILCV BRIAR W O O D D R VERNASPU R G O LD E N O A K S D RBRANDYLN B R O K E N S P O K E T R L N O R T H W O O D D R T I F F A N Y L N R O C K Y H O L L O W T R L A X I S LP OAK R I D G E C I R S P R I N G V A L L E Y R D WILLIAMSDR L O N E S O M E TRL TERRYLN L A K E W AY D R ADDIELN WHISPEROAKSLN SKINN E R L N O A K CREST LN RIVERRD W OODLANDRD CANYONRD Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only ¯ Future Land Use / Overall Transportation Plan Attachment 2 REZ-2016-024 Legend Thoroughfare Future Land Use Institutional Regional Commercial Community Commercial Employment Center Low Density Residential Mining Mixed Use Community Mixed Use Neighborhood Center Moderate Density Residential Open Space Specialty Mixed Use Area Ag / Rural Residential Existing Collector Existing Freeway Existing Major Arterial Existing Minor Arterial Existing Ramp Proposed Collector Proposed Freeway Propsed Frontage Road Proposed Major Arterial Proposed Minor Arterial Proposed Railroad High Density Residential 0 ¼½Mi LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ Page 22 of 88 GABRIELVIEWDR B O O T Y S CROSSING RD SUT T O N P L R A N D OLPH RD W E S T W O O D L N DEE R H A V E N D R N ORTHWESTBLV D WESTE R N T R L R ID GECRESTRD POW E R R D PARKER D R PARK M E A D O W B L V D O A K L N KAT H I L N P E C A N L N MELANI E L N WAGON W HEELTRL DAWNDR S P R INGW O O D LN ME S Q U I T E L N D U N M AN DR STACEY LN JO H N T H O M A S D R NORTHCROSSRD W I N DMILL CV ME L I S S A C T C L E A R S P R I N G R D B UFFAL O S P RIN G S T R L C O T T O N W O O D D R FAIRVIE W R D P A T TI D R E RU S T L E C V KIMB E R L Y S T R I V E R B E N D D R P R I M R O S E T R L S P A N IS H O A K D R PARKLN WHITE TAILCV BRIAR W O O D D R VERNASPU R G O LD E N O A K S D RBRANDYLN B R O K E N S P O K E T R L N O R T H W OOD D R T I F F A N Y L N R O C K Y H O L L O W T R L A X I S LP OAK R I D G E C I R S P R I N G V A L L E Y R D WILLIAMSDR L O N E S O M E TRL TERRYLN L A K E W AY D R ADDIELN WHISPEROAKSLN SKINN E R L N O A K CREST LN RIVERRD W OODLANDRD CANYONRD Zoning InformationREZ-2016-024 Attachment 3 Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only Legend SiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ ¯ 0 ¼½MiPage 23 of 88 Maximum Building Height = 30 feet Front Setback = 20 feet Bufferyard = 10 feet with plantings Maximum Building Size = 0.3 FAR, (0 feet for build-to/downtown) adjacent to AG, RE, RL, RS, TF, MH, max. bldg. size 7,500 SF Side Setback = 5 feet MF-1, or MF-2 districts (only applies to those uses Side Setback to Residential = 10 feet marked with * below)Rear Setback = 0 feet Rear Setback to Residential = 20 feet Allowed by Right Subject to Limitations Special Use Permit (SUP) Required Assisted Living Activity Center (youth/senior)Bar/Tavern/Pub* Dry Cleaning Service*Bed and Breakfast (with events)Community Center Emergency Services Station Consumer repair*Event Facility Government/Postal Office Day Care (group/commercial)Inn Group Home (7+ residents)Dry cleaning service (drop off only)Restaurant (drive-through)* Hospice facility Farmer's market* Library/Museum Fitness center* Nature Preserve/Community Garden Food catering services* Nursing/Convalescent/Hospice General retail* Parking Lot (park-n-ride)General office* Utilities (Minor)Home health care services* Home based business Laundromat* Medical or dental offices* Micro Brewery/Winery Park (neighborhood) Printing, mailing and reproduction services* Personal services* Religious assembly facility (with columbarium) Restaurant (General)* School (Elementary, Middle) Upper-story Residential Utilities (Intermediate) Wireless Transmission Facility (<41') Neighborhood Commercial (CN) District District Development Standards Specific Uses Allowed within the District Page 24 of 88 City of Georgetown, Texas Planning and Zoning November 1, 2016 SUBJECT: Public Hearing and p o s s ib le ac tion on a reques t to Rezone approximately 83.5 ac res in the W. Roberts Survey loc ated no rth of Fairway Lane and so uth o f S hell Road, from the Agric ulture (AG) District to the Residential Single-Family (RS) and Loc al Commerc ial (C-1) Districts . (REZ-2016-025, Hid d en Oaks at Berry Creek) Carolyn Horner, AICP, Planner ITEM SUMMARY: Background: The ap p licant has reques ted to rezo ne the und eveloped 83.5 ac re tract from the Agric ulture (AG) District to the Res id ential Single-family (RS) and Loc al Commerc ial (C-1) Districts to allo w fo r future residential and commerc ial d evelopment o f the p ro p erty. Public Comment: To d ate, Staff has rec eived two written res pons e in favo r of the reques t. Staff Recommendation: Staff rec o mmend s approval o f the req uest to rezo ne the 83.5 acre trac t to the RS and C-1 Districts . FINANCIAL IMPACT: None studied at this time. SUBMITTED BY: Carolyn Horner, AICP, Planner, and Sofia Nels o n, C NU-A, P lanning Director ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Staff Report Cover Memo Location Map Backup Material Future Land Us e Backup Material Zoning Map Backup Material RS Dis trict Standards Backup Material C-1 Dis trict Standards Backup Material Public Comment Backup Material Page 25 of 88 Georgetown Planning Department Staff Report Hidden Oaks at Berry Creek rezoning  AG to RS and C‐1 Page 1 of 6  Report Date:  October 20, 2016  File No:   REZ‐2016‐025  Project Planner: Carolyn Horner, AICP, Planner   Item Details    Project Name: Hidden Oaks at Berry Creek    Project Address: 200 Fairway Lane        Total Acreage: 83.5 acres  Legal Description: 83.5 acres out of the W. Roberts Survey  Existing Zoning: Agriculture (AG)  Proposed Zoning:  Single‐family Residential (RS) and  Local Commercial (C-1) Overview of Applicant’s Request  The applicant has requested to rezone the undeveloped 83.5 acre tract from the Agriculture  (AG) District to the Residential Single‐family (RS) and Local Commercial (C‐1) Districts to  allow for future residential and commercial development of the property. The applicant is  proposing several open space/habitat protection areas to preserve Heritage Trees.  Site Information  Location:   The subject site is located south of Shell Road, between State Highway 195 and Fairway Lane in  the northwestern portion of the city.  Physical Characteristics:   The property is  mostly undeveloped with heavy tree coverage and a couple of residences. Public  street frontage is located on Fairway Lane, existing in the Berry Creek Subdivision, and State  Highway 195.  Surrounding Properties:    Location Zoning Future Land Use Existing Use  North  AG, ETJ Mixed Use Community,  Community Comm. Node Church, undeveloped  South  RS Moderate Density Residential Berry Creek subdivision  East  AG Mixed Use Community Undeveloped  West  ETJ Mixed Use Community Boat/RV Storage, maternity  home  Page 26 of 88 Planning Department Staff Report Hidden Oaks at Berry Creek rezoning  AG to RS and C‐1 Page 2 of 6  Property History  The majority of the 83.5‐acre property was annexed in 2006 by Ordinance 2006‐134. The smaller  southern and eastern pieces totaling 14.459 acres will be annexed after second reading scheduled  for November 22, 2016. The default AG District is the default zoning district assigned at time of  annexation. The property is currently developed with two residences.  2030 Comprehensive Plan  Future Land Use:  The 2030 Future Land Use category for this subject site is Mixed Use Community. The Mixed Use  Community category is described in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan as appropriate for larger scale,  creatively planned communities, where a mix of residential types and densities are  complemented by supporting retail and small to medium scale office development. This category  also encourages more compact, sustainable development patterns that reduce auto trips, increase  connectivity and encourage walking and use of transit.      Growth Tier:  The 2030 Plan Growth Tier Map designation is Tier 1B, the area within the present city limits, or  subject to a development agreement, surrounding Tier 1A that is generally underserved by  infrastructure and where such service and facilities will likely be needed to meet the growth  needs of the city once Tier 1A approaches build‐out.  Transportation  The development will extend existing Fairway Lane into the subject property. A phase of the  development will provide one new connection to SH 195. One connection to Shell Road is  planned with future development of the property. A TIA has been submitted by the applicant for  review, and will be completed prior to approval of the associated preliminary plat.    Utilities  Water/wastewater is served by the City of Georgetown.  Electric service is provided by PEC. The  Development Engineer has determined there is adequate capacity for development, with a  master‐planned water line in the area.  Proposed Zoning District  The RS District is intended for areas of medium density with a minimum lot size of 5,500 square  feet. The RS District contains standards for development that maintain Single‐family  neighborhood characteristics. The District may be located within proximity of neighborhood‐ friendly commercial and public services and protected from incompatible uses. All housing  types in the RS District shall meet the lot, dimensional and design standards of the District. (See  attached).    Page 27 of 88 Planning Department Staff Report Hidden Oaks at Berry Creek rezoning  AG to RS and C‐1 Page 3 of 6  The C‐1 District is intended to provide areas for commercial and retail activities that primarily  serve residential areas.  Uses should have pedestrian access to adjacent and nearby residential  areas, but are not appropriate along residential streets or residential collectors.  The District is  most appropriate along major and minor thoroughfares.  Typical uses within this district are  general retail, restaurants (including drive‐through), gas stations, medical or dental offices, etc.   Attachment 4 contains a comprehensive list of C‐1 District allowable uses and development  standards. Certain land uses have specific design limitations to ensure compatibility with the  surrounding properties; for example, in the C‐1 District, the floor to area ratio of a building  cannot exceed 0.5 for certain land uses specified in Attachment 5.      Staff Analysis  The subject property is located within the Future Land Use category of Mixed Use Community that  encourages a mixture of residential and commercial uses within close proximity to each other.   The first land use goal of the 2030 Plan encourages a balanced mix of residential, commercial,  and employment uses to reflect a gradual transition of development throughout the city.  Although mixed use can be integrated vertically, it can also be accomplished horizontally with  adjacent mixes of uses that complement one another. Commercial development in the mixed use  category should complement a mix of residential types by providing supporting retail and small  to medium scale office development.      The land uses permitted in the C‐1 District proposed along SH 195 with the district development  standards directly help to implement the 2030 Plan’s goals of a balance of land uses as well as  ensuring smooth transitions with space and landscaping buffers between residential and  commercial uses. As development continues to extend to the northwest portion of the city, the  Page 28 of 88 Planning Department Staff Report Hidden Oaks at Berry Creek rezoning  AG to RS and C‐1 Page 4 of 6  need for goods and services closer to residents (both current and future) is necessary in order to  achieve a balanced community as well as incrementally address traffic related concerns.       Goal 1 of the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan states that the City should  “promote sound, sustainable, and compact development patterns with balanced land uses, a  variety of housing choices and well‐integrated transportation, public facilities, and open space  amenities.” The rezoning of this property to the RS District for the future residential  development supports this goal.  C‐1 zoning at this location will reserve land suitable for  commercial development along a major arterial.      The proposed rezoning request meets all of the criteria established in UDC Section 3.06.030 for  zoning changes:    Approval Criteria for Rezoning  The application is complete and the  information contained within the  application is sufficient  and correct enough  to allow adequate review and final action  An application must provide the necessary information to  review and make a knowledgeable decision in order for staff  to schedule an application for consideration by P&Z and  City Council.  This application was reviewed by staff and  deemed to be complete.  The zoning change is consistent with the  Comprehensive Plan  The proposed zoning change is consistent with the Future  Land Use of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The request is  consistent with the goal to direct commercial development  primarily to “nodes” or “corridors” where the pattern is  established or appropriate. The Mixed Use Community  category supports the C‐1 District at this location since the  district’s allowed uses include neighborhood serving  businesses that would accommodate the existing and future  residential neighborhoods that are part of this request.   The zoning change promotes the health,  safety or general welfare of the City and the  safe orderly, and healthful development of  the City  The zoning change request promotes the health, safety and  general welfare of the City. The C‐1 District will help  facilitate orderly commercial development along a major  arterial roadway. The large open spaces of the residentially‐ zoned portion protects environmentally sensitive areas, and  provides undeveloped, natural areas.  The zoning change is compatible with the  present zoning and conforming uses of  nearby property and with the character of  the neighborhood  The proposed rezoning is compatible with the surrounding  zoning districts and uses. Landscape buffers will be  required, per the UDC, where the property abuts residential  zoning.      The property to be rezoned is suitable for  uses permitted by the District that would be  applied by the proposed amendment.  The uses allowed in the C‐1 District are suitable along major  arterials (SH 195) and within the areas of the Future Land  Use designated as Mixed Use Community.         Page 29 of 88 Planning Department Staff Report Hidden Oaks at Berry Creek rezoning  AG to RS and C‐1 Page 5 of 6  General Findings  Based on all the information presented, staff has made the following findings:    1. Fairway Lane is an existing collector, built to early code standards. The applicant will  extend Fairway Lane as a collector and provide connectivity to State Highway 195, and a  future connection to Shell Road. These connections will provide alternative routes to the  residents in the neighborhood, as well as easy access to the proposed C‐1 district along  State Highway 195, an existing highway, and the transportation network at this location can  support the traffic that may be generated by the uses anticipated in the C‐1 District.  2. The Future Land Use category of Mixed Use Community supports the mix of single‐family  residential types proposed by the applicant, and also the C‐1 District along the existing  highway, since this category is intended for a mixture of land uses where commercial uses  will complement existing and future residential development anticipated in the  surrounding area.   3. Goal 1 of the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan states that the City should  “promote sound, sustainable, and compact development patterns with balanced land uses, a variety  of housing choices and well‐integrated transportation, public facilities, and open space amenities.”  The rezoning of this property to the RS District for the future residential development  supports this goal.  C‐1 zoning at this location will reserve land suitable for commercial  development along a major arterial.      4. There are master‐plan construction projects that will ensure sufficient capacity within the  City Utility Systems to accommodate the residential and commercial development resulting  from the proposed rezoning from the AG to RS and C‐1 District at this location.  Staff Recommendation  Staff recommends approval of the applicant’s zoning request based on the above‐mentioned  findings.    Public Comments  As required by the Unified Development Code, all property owners within a 200 foot radius of  the subject property that are located within City limits were notified of the rezoning application  (21 notices mailed), a legal notice advertising the public hearing was placed in the Sun  Newspaper (October 16, 2016) and signs were posted on‐site. To date, staff has received 2 written  letters in support of this request.         Page 30 of 88 Planning Department Staff Report Hidden Oaks at Berry Creek rezoning  AG to RS and C‐1 Page 6 of 6  Attachments  Attachment 1 – Location Map  Attachment 2 – Future Land Use Map   Attachment 3 – Zoning Map  Attachment 4 – RS District Development Standards and Permitted Land Uses  Attachment 5 – C‐1 District Development Standards and Permitted Land Uses  Attachment 6 – Public Notice Responses  Page 31 of 88 §¨¦35 S h ell R d ¬«1 9 5 ¬«1 9 5 SunCityBlvd ¬«1 9 5 AirportRd REZ-2 016-0 25Exhibit #1 Co ord inate System: Texas Sta te Plane/Centra l Zone/NAD 83/U S FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purp oses Only ¯ Locati on Map 0 0.5 1Mi Le ge n dSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ Page 32 of 88 B E R R Y C R E EKDR SHELL RD ¬«19 5 S H 1 9 5 SHELL RD Coo rd inate Sys tem: Te xas S tate Plane/C entral Zone/N AD 83/U S FeetCartographic D ata Fo r General Planning Purposes O nly ¯ Future Land Use / Overall Transportation Plan Exhi bit #2 REZ-20 16 -02 5 Legend Thoroughfare Future Land Use Institutional Regi onal Commercial Community Commerc ial Em ployment Center Low Dens ity Residential Mining Mix ed Us e Community Mix ed Us e Neighborhood Center Moderate Density Residential Open Space Specialty Mixed Us e Area Ag / Rural Residential Ex isting Collector Ex isting Freeway Ex isting Major Arterial Ex isting Minor Arterial Ex isting Ramp Pr oposed Collector Pr oposed Freeway Pr opsed Frontage Road Pr oposed Major Arterial Pr oposed Minor Arterial Pr oposed Railroad High Density Residential 0 ¼½¾Mi Le ge ndSi teParcelsCity Lim itsGeorgetown ETJ Page 33 of 88 B E R R Y C R E EKDR SHELL RD ¬«19 5 S H 1 9 5 SHELL RD Zon in g Inf ormationREZ-2 016-0 25Exhibit #3 Co ord inate System: Texas Sta te Plane/Centra l Zone/NAD 83/U S FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purp oses Only Le ge n dSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ ¯ 0 ¼½¾MiPage 34 of 88 Minimum Lot Size = 5,500 square feet Front Setback = 20 feet Bufferyard = 10 feet with plantings Minimum Lot Width = 45 feet Side Setback = 6 feet     when non‐residential develops Maximum Building Height = 35 feet Rear Setback = 10 feet     adjacent to residential Allowed by Right Subject to Limitations Special Use Permit (SUP) Required Group Home (<7 residents) Church (with columbarium) Accessory Dwelling Unit Single‐family Detached Day Care (family home) Activity Center (youth/senior) Utilities (Minor) Golf Course Bed and Breakfast (with events) Home Based Business Cemetary/Columbaria/Mausoleum Nature Preserve/Community Garden Community Center Neighborhood Amenity Center Day Care (Group) Park (Neighborhood) Emergency Services Station School (Elementary) General Office Single‐family Attached Halfway House Utilities (Intermediate) Hospice Facility Wireless Transmission Facility (<41') Rooming/Boarding House School (Middle) Residential Single‐Family (RS) District District Development Standards Specific Uses Allowed within the District Page 35 of 88 Maximum Building Height = 35 feet Front Setback = 25 feet Bufferyard = 15 feet with plantings  Maximum Building Size = .5 FAR      (0 feet for build‐to/downtown)    adjacent to AG, RE, RL, RS, TF, MH,       (only applies to those uses Side Setback = 10 feet     MF‐1, or MF‐2 districts      marked with * below) Side Setback to Residential = 15 feet Rear Setback = 0 feet Rear Setback to Residential = 25 feet Allowed by Right Subject to Limitations Special Use Permit (SUP) Required Agricultural Sales* Activity Center (youth/senior) Event Facility Artisan Studio/Gallery* Bar/Tavern/Pub Meat Market Assisted Living Bed and Breakfast (with events) Multifamily Attached Automotive Parts Sales (indoor)* Business/Trade School Personal Services Restricted Banking/Financial Services* Car Wash Private Transport  Dispatch Facility Blood/Plasma Center* Church (with columbarium) Student Housing Consumer Repair* College/University Dry Cleaning Service* Commercial Recreation Emergency Services Station Community Center Farmer's Market* Dance Hall/Night Club Fitness Center* Day Care (group/commercial) Food Catering Services* Fuel Sales Funeral Home* Live Music/Entertainment General Retail* Micro Brewery/Winery General Office* Neighborhood Amenity Center Government/Postal Office Park (neighborhood/regional) Group Home (7+ residents) Pest Control/Janitorial Services Home Health Care Services* Self‐Storage (indoor only) Hospital School (Elementary, Middle, High) Hotel/Inn (excluding extended stay) Theater (movie/live) Integrated Office Center* Upper‐story Residential Landscape/Garden Sales* Wireless Transmission Facility (<41') Laundromat* Library/Museum Medical Diagnostic Center* Medical Office/Clinic/Complex* Membership Club/Lodge* Nature Preserve/Community Garden Nursing/Convalescent/Hospice Parking Lot (commercial/park‐n‐ride) Personal Services* Printing/Mailing/Copying Services* Restaurant (general/drive‐through)* Rooming/Boarding House Social Service Facility Surgery/Post Surgery Recovery* Urgent Care Facility* Utilities (Minor/Intermediate/Major) Veterinary Clinic (indoor only)* Local Commercial (C‐1) District District Development Standards Specific Uses Allowed within the District Page 36 of 88 Page 37 of 88 Page 38 of 88 City of Georgetown, Texas Planning and Zoning November 1, 2016 SUBJECT: Public Hearing and p o s s ib le ac tion on a reques t to Rezone approximately 10.058 ac res in the Frances A Hud s o n Survey lo c ated at 555 Rab b it Hill Ro ad from the Agric ulture (AG) Dis tric t to the Bus iness Park (BP) District. (R EZ-2016-026, Enterp ris e Pipeline) ITEM SUMMARY: Background The ap p licant has reques ted to rezo ne the 10.058 ac re tract from the Agriculture (AG) District to the Busines s Park (BP ) Dis tric t fo r future c o mmerc ial develo p ment of the prop erty. The proposed initial p ro ject includes a c rude o il pipeline pump statio n o n ap p ro ximately 2 acres of the parc el, res erving the remaining p ortio n fo r future c o mmercial d evelo p ment. Public Comment To d ate, no written pub lic comments have been Staff Recommendation: Staff rec o mmend s approval of the reques t to rezone the 10.058 ac re tract to the BP District. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None studied at this time SUBMITTED BY: Matt Synatsc hk, His toric P lanner and So fia Nels on, CNU-A, Planning Direc to r ATTACHMENTS: Description Type REZ-2016-026 Enterpris e Rezoning Staff Report Cover Memo Attachment 1 - Location Map Backup Material Attachment 2 - Future Land Us e Map Backup Material Attachment 3 - Zoning Map Backup Material Attachment 4 - Aerial Map Backup Material Attachment 5 - BP Zoning Dis trict Development Standards and Land Us es Backup Material Page 39 of 88 Georgetown Planning Department Staff Report Enterprise Pipeline Rezoning AG to BP Page 1 of 5 Report Date: October 14, 2016 File No: REZ-2016-026 Project Planner: Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner Item Details Project Name: Enterprise Pipeline Rezoning Project Address: 555 Rabbit Hill Road Total Acreage: 10.058 acres Legal Description: 10.058 acres of the Frances A Hudson Survey Current Zoning: Agriculture (AG) Proposed Zoning: Business Park (BP) Overview of Applicant’s Request The applicant has requested to rezone the undeveloped 10.058 acre tract from the Agriculture (AG) District to the Business Park (BP) District for future commercial development of the property. The proposed initial project includes a crude oil pipeline pump station on approximately 2 acres of the parcel, reserving the remaining portion for future commercial development. Page 40 of 88 Planning Department Staff Report Enterprise Pipeline Rezoning AG to BP Page 2 of 5 Site Information Location: The subject site is located on Rabbit Hill Road, between Southeast Inner Loop to the north and Westinghouse Road to the south in the southeastern portion of the City. Physical Characteristics: The property is 10.058 acres in size, and currently developed as a single family residence. A tree survey has not been submitted at this stage of the process and therefore the presence of protected or heritage trees is unknown. The property has public street access on Rabbit Hill Road. Surrounding Properties: Location Zoning Future Land Use Existing Use North ETJ Employment Center Undeveloped Commercial/Residential Land South ETJ Employment Center Single family residence East ETJ Employment Center Undeveloped Commercial/Residential Land West ETJ Employment Center Undeveloped Commercial/Residential Land Property History The 10.058 acre property was annexed into the City in 2016 by Ordinance No. 2016-34. At the time of annexation into the City, the default Agriculture (AG) District was assigned. The property is currently developed for single family residential use. 2030 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use: The 2030 Future Land Use category for this subject site is Employment Center. The Employment Center category is described in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan as appropriate for undeveloped land at strategic locations, designed for large scale employment and business activities. Uses may include retail, services and high density residential development. The land use type may also serve as a transitional zone between more intense commercial and residential areas. Growth Tier: The 2030 Plan Growth Tier Map designation is Tier 2, which is typically in the City’s ETJ areas that will likely be needed to serve the City’s growth needs over the next 10-20 years. However, the City may consider requests for annexation, extension of city services, and rezonings in these areas. Transportation The property has approximately 740 feet of street frontage on along Rabbit Hill Road, which is designated as a collector level road by the 2035 Thoroughfare Plan. The property is primarily accessed by Rabbit Hill Road. The proposed use will not generate a significant increase in traffic, but future development may trigger a Traffic Impact Analysis. Page 41 of 88 Planning Department Staff Report Enterprise Pipeline Rezoning AG to BP Page 3 of 5 Utilities Water/wastewater is served by the City of Georgetown. Electric service is dually-certified by the City of Georgetown and ONCOR. Proposed Zoning District The Business Park District (BP) is intended to provide a location for office, research, and light industrial uses typically located as part of a large development. The BP District may be appropriate adjacent to residential areas, provided that there is adequate buffering and pedestrian and vehicular access to the residential area for workers in the business park. The BP District typically has more traffic than in an office area, but fewer heavy vehicles than in an industrial area. The Business Park District is a special purpose district because it has a minimum size acreage for limited complementary uses that may expand with the size of the park. Larger parks often include commercial activities such as restaurants, banks, day care and similar uses that are intended to serve the on-site community and may include some limited high-density residential. A list of allowed uses is included as Exhibit # 4. Staff Analysis The proposed Business Park zoning district is appropriate for this site based upon the property owner’s proposed use and the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The property owner is proposing to construct a pump station for the Enterprise Pipeline crude oil line, which will run from Midland, TX to Sealy, TX. The proposed pipeline will run adjacent to an existing refined fuels pipeline, minimizing the impact on the surrounding areas. Since the pump station will only use a portion of the parcel, the BP zoning allows for other uses that are consistent with the desired uses outlined in the Employment Center land use category of the Future Land Use Plan. Policy 1.A of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan encourages a mix of residential, commercial and employment uses, reflecting a gradual transition from high intensity uses to lower intensity uses. The BP zoning district creates a transitional area between the high intensity commercial developments along the I-35 corridor, and the Moderate Density Residential areas to the east. Policy 1.B promotes a mix of uses that create a more compact, higher density development in appropriate locations. These include walkable communities, and developments that blend residential and commercial uses. The BP zoning district is appropriate for this location because it allows for the mix of uses, including retail and employment opportunities, along with options for high density housing. Page 42 of 88 Planning Department Staff Report Enterprise Pipeline Rezoning AG to BP Page 4 of 5 The proposed rezoning request meets all of the criteria established in UDC Section 3.06.030 for zoning changes: Approval Criteria for Rezoning The application is complete and the information contained within the application is sufficient and correct enough to allow adequate review and final action The application was reviewed by staff and deemed complete. The zoning change is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan The proposed zoning change is consistent with the Future Land Use Plan’s Employment Center designation. The zoning change promotes the health, safety or general welfare of the City and the safe orderly, and healthful development of the City The proposed zoning change promotes orderly growth in the City by creating lower intensity uses that help transition from the high intensity uses found along the I-35 corridor and the residential uses to the east of the subject property. The zoning change is compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood The proposed rezoning is compatible with the surrounding zoning districts and uses. The majority of the surrounding property is located outside of the City limits, where zoning ordinances are not applicable. The property to the northwest is located within in City limits, and is zoned for Industrial uses. The property to be rezoned is suitable for uses permitted by the District that would be applied by the proposed amendment. The uses allowed by the BP district are compatible with the property owners planned use and future uses for the property. General Findings Based on all the information presented, staff has made the following findings: 1. The southeast quadrant of Georgetown is experiencing increased growth as the Austin metropolitan area continues to expand. Much of the existing and proposed land use in the area is residential, so the BP zoning district creates an opportunity for employment centers and retail opportunities to support the surrounding residential areas. 2. The Future Land Use category of Employment Center supports the BP zoning district for this location to serve as a transitional area from commercial development to residential development. 3. Goal 1, Policies and Action 1.A states that the City should “adjust zoning provisions to provide greater flexibility for mixed-uses, multiple housing types, compact development and redevelopment.” The BP zoning district supports this goal by providing for a mix of commercial and residential uses, design to create a more compact development. Page 43 of 88 Planning Department Staff Report Enterprise Pipeline Rezoning AG to BP Page 5 of 5 4. The property is located along Rabbit Hill Road, a collector level road, and can support the traffic that may be generated by the uses anticipated in the BP District. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the applicant’s zoning request based on the above-mentioned findings. Public Comments As required by the Unified Development Code, all property owners within a 200 foot radius of the subject property that are located within City limits were notified of the rezoning application (2 notices mailed), a legal notice advertising the public hearing was placed in the Sun Newspaper (October 16, 2016) and two signs were posted on-site. To date, staff has not received any written or verbal comments in support or against the zoning request. Attachments Exhibit 1 – Location Map Exhibit 2 – Future Land Use Map Exhibit 3 – Zoning Map Exhibit 4 – BP District Development Standards and Permitted Land Uses Page 44 of 88 §¨¦35 Leander R d W e s ti n g h o u s e R d S E I n n e r L o o p SamHoustonAve ")1460 ")14 60 Tera vi s t a X in g Teravista C l u b D r W e s ti n g h o u s e R d R a b b it H I ll R d REZ-2 016-0 26Exhibit #1 Co ord inate System: Texas Sta te Plane/Centra l Zone/NAD 83/U S FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purp oses Only ¯ Locati on Map 0 0.5 1Mi Le ge n dSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ Page 45 of 88 \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ BL UE S P R I N G SBLVD §¨¦35 ")1460 Coo rd inate Sys tem: Te xas S tate Plane/C entral Zone/N AD 83/U S FeetCartographic D ata Fo r General Planning Purposes O nly ¯ Future Land Use / Overall Transportation Plan Exhi bit #2 REZ-20 16 -02 6 Legend Thoroughfare Future Land Use Institutional Regi onal Commercial Community Commerc ial Em ployment Center Low Dens ity Residential Mining Mix ed Us e Community Mix ed Us e Neighborhood Center Moderate Density Residential Open Space Specialty Mixed Us e Area Ag / Rural Residential Ex isting Collector Ex isting Freeway Ex isting Major Arterial Ex isting Minor Arterial Ex isting Ramp Pr oposed Collector Pr oposed Freeway Pr opsed Frontage Road Pr oposed Major Arterial Pr oposed Minor Arterial Pr oposed Railroad High Density Residential 0 ¼½¾Mi Le ge ndSi teParcelsCity Lim itsGeorgetown ETJ Page 46 of 88 BL UE S P R I N G SBLVD §¨¦35 ")1460 Zon in g Inf ormationREZ-2 016-0 26Exhibit #3 Co ord inate System: Texas Sta te Plane/Centra l Zone/NAD 83/U S FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purp oses Only Le ge n dSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ ¯ 0 ¼½¾MiPage 47 of 88 S IH 35 SB S IH 35 NB S IH 35 FWY SB F O X D R S IH 35 FWY NB L O O K O U T R D G EXIT 255B NB R A B B I T H I L L R D SIE R R A W A Y S T C O U R T N E Y D R S IH 35 NB R A B B I T H I L L R D S IH 35 NB S IH 35 FWY NB R A B B I T H I L L R D R A B B I T H I L L R D R A B B I T H I L L R D S I E R R A W A Y S T Co ord inate System: Texas Sta te Plane/Centra l Zone/NAD 83/U S FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purp oses Only ¯ Aerial REZ-2 016-0 26 Le ge n d SiteCity Limits 0 500 1,000FeetPage 48 of 88 Maximum Building Height = 60 feet Front Setback = 25 feet Bufferyard = 15 feet with plantings  Side Setback = 10 feet     adjacent to AG, RE, RL, RS, TF, MH,  Side Setback to Residential = 20 ft     TH, MF‐1, or MF‐2 districts Rear Setback = 10 feet Rear Setback to Residential = 25 ft Allowed by Right Subject to Limitations Special Use Permit (SUP) Required Emergency Services Station Upper Story Residential MF Detached Unity Government/Post Office Home Based Business Boutique Hotel Nature Preserve/Community Garden Trade/Business School Fuel Sales Food Catering Services Day Care, Group/Commercial Car Wash Home Health Care Services Church Warehouse/Distribution, Limited Medical Complex Church with Columbarium General Office Neighborhood Public Park Integrated Office Center Hotel (Full/Limited Service) Data Center Hotel Extended Stay Small Engine Repair Restaurant, General/Drive Through Commercial Document Storage General Retail Event Catering/Equipment Rental Personal Services Furniture Repair/Upholstery Dry Cleaning, Drop off Only Office Showroom Printing/Mailing/Copy Services Wholesale Showrooms Fitness Center Parking Lot, Offsite/Commercial Heliport Park‐n‐Ride Facility Seasonal Product Sales Utilities (Minor, Intermediate, Major)Farmer's market, Temporary Contractor Services, Limited Mobile/Outdoor Food Vendor Movie Production Business Offices, Temporary Printing/Publishing Concrete Products, Temporary Office/Warehouse Construction Field Office Research, Testing/Development Lab Construction Staging, Off‐site Manufacturing, Processing, Assembly Parking Lot, Temporary       Limited Wireless Transmission                      Facility (>40') BUSINESS PARK (BP) DISTRICT District Development Standards Specific Uses Allowed within the District Page 49 of 88 City of Georgetown, Texas Planning and Zoning November 1, 2016 SUBJECT: Public Hearing and p o s s ib le ac tion on a reques t to Rezone Lo t 1, Bloc k F, Summit at Rivery Park Phas es 5 & 6, loc ated at 1101 Wo o d lawn Avenue to amend the Summit at R ivery P ark Planned Unit Develo p ment (PUD) Dis trict. (REZ-2016--027, S herato n Geo rgeto wn) Valerie Kreger, AICP, P rinc ip al Planner ITEM SUMMARY: Background: The ap p licant is req ues ting an amendment to the Summit at Rivery Park PUD to alter the signage regulations spec ifically applic able to the mo nument sign fo r the Sheraton at Georgeto wn Ho tel and Conferenc e Center. The current signage s tand ard s within the PUD’s Development Plan allo w fo r s ix frees tand ing mo nument s igns within the o verall S ummit d evelopment with a maximum height of 8 feet eac h and maximum of 48 s q uare feet p er s ign fac e. The p ro p o s ed language would allow one ad d itional mo nument s ign spec ifically o n the hotel s ite with a maximum height o f 12 feet, maximum width of 6 feet, and maximum s ign fac e of 58 square feet (eac h). The req uested amendment d o es no t p ro p o s e any changes to the land us es or other d evelopment s tand ards that would affect any s ep arate agreement assoc iated with the Summit at Rivery P ark d evelopment. This is the fifth amend ment to the Summit at Rivery P ark PUD s inc e its original approval in 2007. Public Comment: To date, s taff has received no written pub lic c o mments , altho ugh staff has received numero us p hone inquiries . Staff Recommendation: Staff rec o mmend s approval of the reques t to amend the Summit at Rivery P ark PUD. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None studied at this time. SUBMITTED BY: Valerie Kreger, AICP, Principal Planner, and S o fia Nels o n, CNU-A, Planning Direc tor ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Staff Report Cover Memo Attachments 1-3 - Location, Future Land Use, and Zoning Maps Backup Material PUD Development Plan Exhibit Page 50 of 88 Georgetown Planning Department Staff Report Summit at Rivery Park PUD, 5th Amendment Page 1 of 5 Report Date: October 27, 2016 File No: REZ-2016-027 Project Planner: Valerie Kreger, AICP, Principal Planner Item Details Project Name: Summit at Rivery Park PUD, 5th Amendment Location: 1101 Woodlawn Ave. Acreage: 4.2 acres Zoning: Planned Unit Development (PUD) Applicant’s Request The applicant is requesting an amendment to the Summit at Rivery Park PUD to alter the signage regulations specifically applicable to the monument sign for the Sheraton at Georgetown Hotel and Conference Center. The current signage standards within the PUD’s Development Plan allow for six freestanding monument signs within the overall Summit development with a maximum height of 8 feet each and maximum of 48 square feet per sign face. The proposed language would allow one additional monument sign specifically on the hotel site with a maximum height of 12 feet, maximum width of 6 feet, and maximum sign face of 58 square feet (each). The requested amendment does not propose any changes to the land uses or other development standards that would affect any separate agreement associated with the Summit at Rivery Park development. This is the fifth amendment to the Summit at Rivery Park PUD since its original approval in 2007. Site Information Physical Characteristics: The 4.2-acre property is located on the east side of Woodlawn Boulevard, just north of IH 35, backing up to Rivery Park. The property is developed with the Sheraton at Georgetown Hotel and Convention Center and parking garage. The property drops in elevation on the east side towards Rivery Park and the North Fork San Gabriel River. Surrounding Properties: The properties adjacent to this site include Rivery Park, the Rivery Park Apartments and two commercial lots – one currently under construction – that are also part of the Summit at Rivery Park PUD. Page 51 of 88 Planning Department Staff Report Summit at Rivery Park PUD, 5th Amendment Page 2 of 5 The surrounding zoning, existing uses and future land uses include: Property History The property was annexed into the City limits in 1986 and was part of the original Rivery Concept Plan and was later included in The Rivery Park Development agreement executed in 2002. In December 2007, the property was rezoned from C-3 to PUD and made part of a Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone (TIRZ). The PUD was amended in September 2010, November 2011, September 2012 and December 2013. Additionally, several agreements were approved in December 2013 including a GEDCO Performance Agreement, a GTEC Performance Agreement, a Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Agreement, a Master Development Agreement, and a Joint Use, Access and Lease Agreement, related to construction and financing of the conference center, parking garage, and public infrastructure needed to support the development. Location Zoning Future Land Use Existing Use North Summit at Rivery Park PUD Regional Commercial Undeveloped (future Brownstones) South Summit at Rivery Park PUD Regional Commercial Rivery Park Apartments East C-3, General Commercial Open Space Rivery Park West Summit at Rivery Park PUD Regional Commercial Developing/ undeveloped commercial lots Page 52 of 88 Planning Department Staff Report Summit at Rivery Park PUD, 5th Amendment Page 3 of 5 2030 Comprehensive Plan The 2030 Plan land use designation is Regional Commercial, which supports uses that draw a regional market, such as major shopping centers, tourist attractions and supporting accommodations that rely on convenient access from major highways. The 2030 Plan Growth Tier Map designation is Tier 1A, which is the portion of the City where infrastructure systems are in place, or can be economically provided, and where the bulk of the City’s growth should be guided over the near term. Zoning District The PUD, Planned Unit Development District, is intended to allow flexibility in planning and designing for unique or environmentally sensitive properties, which are to be developed in accordance with a common development scheme or planned associations of uses. PUD zoning is designed to accommodate various types of development, including a combination or mix of uses. The PUD zoning district may also provide for variations from the standard UDC requirements allowing for creation of a unique product. The C-3 base district is a regional commercial zoning district that is intended for major thoroughfares and intersections. The C-3 District is the most expansive commercial district in the UDC, allowing uses such as retail, office, restaurants, hotels, and apartments, among others. Utilities Electric, water, and wastewater for this development are served by the City of Georgetown. The requested PUD amendment will not result in an increase in the demand for utilities at this site. Transportation Access to the hotel is taken from Woodlawn Avenue, Hintz Road, as well as a public access easement along the property’s southern boundary. A review of traffic impacts was not deemed necessary with this application due to the limited nature of the requested changes to the Summit at Rivery Park PUD. Staff Analysis The Sheraton at Georgetown is a 7-story 221 room hotel with a conference center and parking garage. The UDC’s signage regulations allow for a 6-foot 48 square foot sign, which is appropriate in most situations since the maximum building height of any of the standard zoning districts is 60 feet (generally 5 stories). The adopted Summit at Rivery Park PUD provides for a 2-foot increase in sign height while maintaining the 48 square foot sign face as a standard for all the monument signs throughout the development, regardless of building size. Staff finds that with the increased height and size of the hotel, the increased sign height and size is proportional and appropriate. The proposed PUD revision is limited to signage which does not change the overall scope of the project as currently allowed within the PUD and therefore does not change the development’s conformance with the 2030 Plan and intent of the Future Land Use designation. Additionally, the Page 53 of 88 Planning Department Staff Report Summit at Rivery Park PUD, 5th Amendment Page 4 of 5 revision does not affect any of the agreements between the City and the developer related to development of the hotel, conference center, parking garage, public infrastructure and related uses. UDC Section 3.06.030 establishes the following criteria for zoning changes: The application is complete and the information contained within the application is sufficient and correct enough to allow adequate review and final action This application was reviewed by staff and deemed to be complete. The zoning change is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan The PUD amendment does not change the zoning’s consistency with the 2030 Plan. The zoning change promotes the health, safety or general welfare of the City and the safe orderly, and healthful development of the City The amendment facilitates appropriate development standards for this project and therefore the orderly and healthful development of the City. The zoning change is compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood The amendment is compatible with the overall vision and character of the Summit at Rivery Park PUD. The property to be rezoned is suitable for uses permitted by the District that would be applied by the proposed amendment. The amendment does not propose to alter any of the uses currently permitted by the PUD. Findings Based on all the information presented, staff has made the following findings: 1. The signage amendment does not change the PUD’s consistency with the 2030 Plan’s Regional Commercial land use category. 2. The increased sign height and size is proportional and appropriate to the 7-story hotel and the development character of the Summit at Rivery Park PUD. 3. The revision does not affect any of the agreements related to development of the hotel, conference center, parking garage, public infrastructure and related uses. Staff Recommendation Staff is recommending approval of the application based on the above findings. Public Comments Public notice was mailed to property owners of 61 properties either within the overall boundaries of the Summit at Rivery PUD or within 200 feet of the property subject to the PUD amendment. Public notice was posted in the Sun newspaper on October 16, 2016, and signs were placed on site. There Page 54 of 88 Planning Department Staff Report Summit at Rivery Park PUD, 5th Amendment Page 5 of 5 have been no written public comments received at the time of this report, although staff has received numerous phone inquiries. Attachments Exhibit 1 – Location Map Exhibit 2 – Future Land Use Map Exhibit 3 – Zoning Map Exhibit A – Development Plan Page 55 of 88 N I H 3 5 R I V E RY B L V D N A U S T I N A V E S IH 3 5 S W I L L I A M S D R Zoning Information REZ-2016-027 Exhibit #3 Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US Feet Cartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only Legend Site Parcels City Limits Georgetown ETJ ¯ 0¼½ MiPage 56 of 88 1 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR THE SUMMIT AT RIVERY PARK Modified August 25, 2016 for Signage Amendment 1. DEFINITIONS 1.1 All definitions referenced in the Unified Development Code of the City of Georgetown, Ordinance No. 2003-15, as subsequently amended and codified in Title 17 of Georgetown Code of Ordinances (the “Code”), shall apply to interpretation of the terms of this Planned Unit Development for the Summit at Rivery Park (this “PUD”). Any terms not defined in this Development Plan shall be construed by applying the Random House Webster’s Unabridged Dictionary, subject to the approval of such interpretation by the director of Planning and Development Services of the City of Georgetown. 2. PROPERTY 2.1 This PUD applies to approximately 31.94 acres of land located within the jurisdictional limits of the City of Georgetown, Texas described by metes and bounds and by plat (for the portions platted) on Exhibit “A” and herein defined as the “Property.” 3. APPROVAL CRITERIA 3.1 This PUD modification has been initiated by the Director pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding between the City and Novak Brothers LLC and Hines Interests Limited Partnership dated May 14, 2013, as amended, and Section 3.06.020.A.4 of the Code. This PUD is intended to conform to the approval criteria of Sections 3.06.030 and 3.06.040 of the Code. Section 3.06.030 of the Code provides that the following criteria shall be considered by City Council for zoning changes: (a) The application is complete and the information contained within the application is sufficient and correct enough to allow adequate review and final action; (b) The zoning change is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; (c) The zoning change promotes the health, safety, or general welfare of the City and the safe, orderly, and healthful development of the City; (d) The zoning change is compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood; and (e) The property to be rezoned is suitable for uses permitted by the District that would be applied by the proposed amendment. Page 57 of 88 2 Section 3.06.040 of the Code provides that, in addition of consideration of the foregoing criteria of Section 3.06.030, the following applicable criteria shall be considered by City Council for approving this PUD: (a) An orderly and creative arrangement of all land uses with respect to each other and to the entire community; (b) A planned and integrated comprehensive transportation system providing for a separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic, to include facilities such as roadways, bicycle ways and pedestrian walkways; (c) The provisions of cultural or recreational facilities for all segments of the community; (d) The location of general building envelopes to take maximum advantage of the natural and manmade environment; and (e) The staging of development in a manner which can be accommodated by the timely provision of public utilities, facilities and services. 4. DEVELOPMENT ZONES 4.1 General. For the purposes of this PUD, the Property is divided into five (5) Development Zones as shown on Exhibit “B”, being Zone A, Zones B1, B2, and B3, and Zone C. 4.2 Zone A. Zone A consists of approximately 8.190 acres of land described as Block H of Phase 5 of The Summit at Rivery Park Preliminary Plat, shown on Exhibit “B”. Zone A consists of the southern one-third of the land comprising the Property and is the development zone closest in proximity to Interstate 35. Zone A is separated from the remainder of the land comprising the Property by the proposed new Woodlawn and Hershey Avenues. Zone A shall be designed and developed for multifamily residential development. A site plan for the multifamily residential development was submitted on 09/27/2013 (SP-2013-022). 4.3 Zone B1. Zone B1 consists of approximately 4.196 acres of land described as Block F of Phase 5 of The Summit at Rivery Park Preliminary Plat, shown on Exhibit “B”. Zone B1 consists of the rear, central portion of the land comprising the Property and is separated from Zone A by the existing access road and easement to Rivery Park and is generally separated from Zone C by the proposed new Hintz Road. Zone B1 is separated from Zones B2 and B3 by the proposed new Woodlawn Avenue. Zone B1 shall be designed and developed for a hotel with at least 221 rooms, a conference center including a ballroom comprised of at least 16,000 square feet, and a multilevel above- ground public parking garage containing at least 336 parking spaces. A site plan for the Hotel/Conference Center/Parking Garage was submitted on 06/05/2013 (SP-2013-009). 4.4 Zone B2. Zone B2 consists of approximately 2.433 acres of land and is generally depicted as Block E of Phase 5 of The Summit at Rivery Park Preliminary Plat, shown on Exhibit “B.” Zone B2 is separated from Zone B1 by the proposed new Woodlawn Avenue and Zone B3 by the proposed extension of Wolf Ranch Parkway and Page 58 of 88 3 is generally separated from Zone C by the proposed new Hintz Road. Zone B2 shall be designed and developed for mixed commercial use and associated surface parking. 4.5 Zone B3. Zone B3 consists of approximately 3.021 acres of land and is generally depicted as Block G of Phase 5 of The Summit at Rivery Park Preliminary Plat, shown on Exhibit “B.” Zone B3 is generally separated from Zones B1 by the proposed new Woodlawn Avenue and Zone B2 by the proposed extension of Wolf Ranch Parkway and is segmented from Zone A by the proposed new Woodlawn and Hershey Avenues. Zone B3 shall be designed and developed for mixed commercial use and associated surface parking. 4.6 Zone C. Zone C consists of approximately 11.0 acres of land and is generally depicted as Phases 1-4 of the Brownstone at the Summit, and Block A of Phase 5 and Phases 6-12 of The Summit at Rivery Park Preliminary Plat, shown on Exhibit “B”. Zone C represents the northern remainder of land comprising the Property and is generally described as the land north of Hintz Road to the eastern edge of the Property. Zone C shall be designed and developed for Brownstone Single Family Residential Development. 4.7 Site Layout. The Site Layout for the Property is also depicted in Exhibit “B”, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference for all purposes. 4.8 Final Site Plans. All Final Site Plans must substantially conform to the terms and conditions of this PUD and, in all material respects, with the Site Layout attached hereto as Exhibit “B”. Multiple Final Site Plans may be submitted for each Zone if necessary to accommodate phased development of the Property. A site plan for the Hotel/Conference Center/Parking Garage was submitted on 06/05/2013 (SP-2013-009). A site plan for the Apartments was submitted on 09/27/2013 (SP-2013-022). 4.9 Building Height. As applied herein, “Building Height” shall be defined according to Section 7.03.030(D) of the Code, except that individual residences within the Brownstone residential development, as defined in Section 6 of this PUD, may include rooftop shade structures, provided that such structures shall not occupy more than thirty-three (33) percent of the area of the roof and must not be visible from the public street in front of the residence. Heights of all Buildings to be designed and developed in Zone C shall comply with building height limitations prescribed under Table 7.03.020 for the C-3 zoning designation, except that the individual residences within the Brownstone residential development may exceed the limitations under Table 7.03.020 by five (5) feet. Heights of all Buildings to be designed and developed in Zone A and Zones B1, B2, and B3 may vary from and exceed building height limitations prescribed under Table 7.03.020 of the Code, as follows: (a) The Building Height for any Building in Zone A, save and except those described in Paragraph 5.9(b) below, shall not exceed the greater of eight (8) stories of vertical improvements or one hundred twenty (120) feet. Page 59 of 88 4 (b) The Building Height for any Building situated in any zone designed primarily as a free-standing restaurant will not exceed 45 feet, excluding architectural enhancement subject to City approval. (c) The Building Height for any Building in Zone B1 shall not exceed the greater of fifteen (15) stories or two hundred twenty-five (225) feet. (d) The Building Height for any Building in Zones B2 or B3 shall not exceed the greater of fifteen (15) stories or two hundred twenty-five (225) feet. 4.10 Setbacks. Except for those improvements identified in Section 7 of this PUD (relating to signage), all improvements designed and developed on the Property shall be subject to a 25-foot perimeter setback, provided, however, that no setback requirements shall be applicable to any common lot lines between any of the legal lots comprising the Property, and improvements that encroach on such common lot lines may be designed and developed under this PUD, provided that the same otherwise comply with the requirements of this PUD and the Code. Pursuant to Sections 7.03.030(C)(4) and 16.02 of the Code, landscape features, outside gathering areas, walkways, swimming pools adjacent to Rivery Park, walls, and minor utilities, shall be permitted within required setback areas, provided that the same shall not encroach on a public utility easement without a License to Encroach. To the extent defined under the Code, the improvements consisting of these features will be included in impervious cover calculations. 4.11 Impervious Cover. Impervious cover shall not exceed seventy-five (75) percent as applied to the aggregate sum of the building and improvement footprints compared to the comprehensive area of land comprising the Property. Individual site plans for the Property shall tabulate cumulative totals relative to impervious cover for the Property. In no case shall a site plan be approved if it causes the impervious cover on the comprehensive area of land comprising the Property to exceed seventy-five (75) percent. 5. APPLICABILITY OF CITY ORDINANCES 5.1 This PUD addresses certain zoning requirements applicable to all portions of the Property. All design, development, and use criteria not specifically covered by this PUD shall be subject to the applicable provisions of the Code. All design, development and use of the Property shall conform to the PUD described herein and, unless superseded, amended or controverted by the terms of this PUD, to a General Commercial District (C-3), which is the zoning designation most similar to and compatible with the design, development and use proposed for the Property. 5.2 The following uses shall be the only allowed uses of the Property: (a) Zone A – Multi-family residential development; (b) Zone B1 – Hotels and Conference/Event Centers, if in conformance with all applicable provisions of this PUD and all written agreements between the City and the owner of the Property in the PUD pertaining to same; (c) Zones B2 and B3 –Limited Service Hotel and/or residential uses, if located on the second floor or above (prohibited on the ground floor); Page 60 of 88 5 (d) Zone C – Brownstone Residential Development, if in conformance with Section 6 of this PUD; (e) Notwithstanding the foregoing, in addition to the uses set forth and permitted in (a)-(d) above, any Zone can include the following allowable uses– (1) Restaurant (no drive-thru); (2) Bar, tavern or pub; (3) General office (upper-story only); (4) General retail; (5) Personal services; and (6) Parking garages. All other uses are prohibited. In addition, tax-exempt uses are prohibited in every Zone on the Property. 6. BROWNSTONE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 6.1 General. Zone C may be developed with Brownstone single family dwellings. The Brownstones are single family dwellings with shared walls on one or more sides situated on separate, legally platted lots. Home-based businesses as an accessory use as defined in Section 5.02.020.E of the Code are permitted in Brownstones. 6.2 Dwelling Size and Number, Setbacks, Lot Dimensions. Brownstones are zero lot line single family dwellings with no required front, rear or side setbacks. Brownstones Maximum Number of Dwellings Connected on One or More Sides, constituting a block of individually platted homes 6 Lot & Dwelling Width, minimum 18 feet Lot & Dwelling Depth, minimum 40 feet Height, maximum 50 feet Dwelling Size, minimum 1700 square feet 6.3 Design Standards. Brownstones shall contain variation through articulation of front façades, using different building materials, colors, entries and window design. Garages for two vehicles per dwelling will be accessed from Brownstone Alleys or Brownstone Streets. Rooftop outdoor living areas are expressly permitted. A schematic presentation of Brownstone lots and design is shown in Exhibit “D”. 6.4 Site Plans. Individual Site Plans for the brownstone lots within Zone C shall not require Site Plan review and shall be reviewed following the Building Permit review process for single-family residential properties, provided that the buildings conform to the building configurations approved in administrative exception AE-2011-007 on file at the Georgetown Planning Department, and provided that a Site Plan will be required and Page 61 of 88 6 reviewed for all other properties and open space lots within Zone C. The site plan approval for an open space lot shall be required prior to the approval of the building plan for the adjacent brownstone lot. Any final Site Plan must also conform in all material respects to the Site Layout, all applicable Exhibits, and this PUD document. 7. MASTER SIGN PLAN 7.1 A comprehensive signage plan for the development of the Property (the “Master Sign Plan”) shall be required. The Master Sign Plan serves to implement signs uniformly as a means of clear visual communication, and is intended to cause the designs of any signs on the Property to be complementary to the natural environment, and to improve pedestrian and vehicular safety. Signs may only convey the name of the businesses and the products or services offered within the Property, provided, however, that temporary construction signs, signs advertising portions of the Property for sale or lease, and temporary signs announcing special events on any portion of the Property shall be permitted. Monument signs, walls, fencing, architectural features, as well as sign design and lettering, along the public right-of-way adjoining the Property will be homogenous and will consist of a standard design to ensure that the comprehensive signage for the Property does not dominate the streetscape. All signs shall be constructed of materials and colors compatible with those utilized on the Buildings’ facades so as to blend into the environment and the development scheme of the Property in general. Billboard signs shall not be erected on the Property. 7.2 The Master Sign Plan shall be submitted to the City for approval by the Building Official prior to and as a condition for final approval of any site plan for any part of the Property. Signage designed, developed or constructed within the Property shall comply with the approved Master Sign Plan. 7.3 Up to six (6) Monument Signs may be designed, developed and constructed along the public right-of-way of the Property, and may be located along the Property’s boundaries in direct proximity of the planned entrances to the Property. Monument Signs shall not be subject to a 25-foot setback from the public right-of way, shall be limited to eight (8) feet in Building Height with a maximum of forty-eight (48) square feet for each of the two (2) permitted sign faces per Monument Sign, and will be installed in such areas as to maximize the public safety of owners, tenants, and invitees of and to the Property, and to enhance the efficiency of vehicular and pedestrian traffic to and from the Property. Monument Signs shall comply with minimum setbacks prescribed in Table 10.06.010 of the Code. 7.4 Low-Profile Signs may be used in lieu of Monument Signs. Low-Profile Signs must not exceed ten (10) feet in Building Height and are otherwise subject to the same limitations applicable to Monument Signs. Low-Profile Signs shall not be subject to a 25- foot setback from the public right-of way. Low-Profile Signs shall comply with minimum setbacks prescribed in Table 10.06.010 of the Code. Page 62 of 88 7 7.5 As the Property represents an integrated and comprehensive mixed use development which is distinct from adjoining developments, architectural features, walls or fencing, not to exceed ten (10) feet in height, may be used at one or more entries fronting Rivery Boulevard to delineate the development and to display the development name and logo. The name of the development and its logo may be used on entry improvements in lieu of Monument Signs, providing that individual business names or logos shall not allowed on any entrance improvements. The maximum area of lettering attached to the architectural features, walls or fencing shall not exceed 48 square feet on each side of the entry. In order to tie the Property together, similar architectural features, walls or fencing may be used along Rivery Boulevard, providing such features do not obstruct vehicular view corridors and do not exceed height requirements prescribed in Section 7.05.010 of the Code. The variance between the maximum heights allowed for entry improvements and the architectural features, walls or fencing along Rivery Boulevard may be achieved by graduating the height between the two maximum heights. The development logo, without the development name, may be used on architectural features, walls or fencing along Rivery Boulevard as a design feature and not be considered signage. Architectural features, walls or fencing, and the attached signage at entries, shall not be subject to a 25-foot setback from the public right-of way and shall be included in the Master Sign Plan. 7.6 Internal Directional Signs and Wayfinding Signs of similar design and colors are allowed throughout the Property and shall be permitted in addition to the Property’s signs along the public right-of-way. Directional Signs shall conform to the specifications set forth in Section 10.03.020 of the Code. Wayfinding Signs which are of a style and size as Municipal Wayfinding Signs may include the names of businesses located on the Property. The number of Internal Directional and Wayfinding Signs will not exceed what is sufficient to provide safe and efficient use of the Property. Directional, wayfinding, and information signage for the public parking garage located in Zone B1 shall be as required by the City in its sole discretion. 7.7 In general, Electronic Message Centers and unshielded Neon Signs shall not be permitted to be designed, developed or constructed on the Property; provided, however, that a maximum of three (3) Electronic Message Centers may be allowed in outdoor public areas internal to the Property provided that the same are not visible from the public right-of-way on Rivery Boulevard and the same otherwise do not impair the safety or wellbeing of the public or any owner, tenant, or invitee of any portion of the Property; and provided further that encased Neon Signs shall be permitted on restaurant building facades provided the same are situated at least one hundred feet (100’) from the public right-of-way on Rivery Boulevard. Electronic Message Centers will be situated so as not to be disruptive to internal vehicular traffic and will principally be used to inform visitors to the Property of activities, events or festivals planned or occurring throughout the community. 7.8 The Hotel, Conference Center, public Parking Garage and Buildings in Zones A, B1, B2, and B3 may be accessed by several proposed driveways from Rivery Boulevard and pedestrian access ways from Rivery Park. Wall signs based upon each Page 63 of 88 8 Building’s primary entrance and Building Façade as defined by Section 16.02 shall be expressly permitted under this PUD pursuant to Section 10.06.030(C) of the Code. Under this PUD, one wall sign secured to the top level of each of the respective Buildings which can be viewed from each view corridor is expressly permitted for the proposed hotel, conference center, and Buildings in Zones A, B1, B2, and B3. The proposed hotel is subject to three (3) view corridors, and therefore a maximum of three (3) wall signs shall be permitted on these improvements. The Buildings situated near the Property’s southerly and easterly boundary lines are subject to two (2) view corridors, and therefore a maximum of two (2) wall signs shall be permitted on these improvements. Wall signs will also be allowed on the parking garages in Zones A, B1, B2, and B3. Specifications for these signs will not exceed those outlined in Section 10.06.030(C)(1) and Table 10.06.010 of the Code, and shall otherwise remain subject to the specifications set forth in the finally approved Master Sign Plan. 7.9 In addition to the six (6) Monument Signs allowed in Section 7.3 along the Property’s boundaries and at the entrances to the Property from the Rivery Boulevard, one (1) additional Monument Sign shall be allowed in front of the Hotel and Conference Center to enhance the efficiency of the vehicular and pedestrian traffic as they approach the main entrance to the Hotel and Conference Center. This one Monument Sign shall be located in the landscaped island located in front of the Hotel and public Parking Garage. The sign shall be limited to twelve feet (12’-0”) in height and six feet (6’-0”) in width with a maximum sign area of 58 square feet for each of the two (2) permitted sign faces. 8. STORM WATER DRAINAGE MAP, WATER QUALITY, AND GREY WATER 8.1 Storm Water Detention. The natural flow of storm water drains across the Property from the south and southwest to the North Fork of the San Gabriel River or to natural drainage channels that discharge to said river. Detention structures are typically required to mitigate the increase in storm water runoff associated with any increase in impervious cover resulting from development; however, due the Property’s location adjacent to the San Gabriel River, detention structures are not required as any increase in runoff will not impact any property or structures downstream of the Property. A comparison of the developed runoff hydrograph of the Property to the pre-development hydrograph of the Property and to the river hydrograph must show that the development of the Property, in accordance with this PUD and the Code, will not impact structures and properties adjacent to the Property or properties downstream of the river. Storm water runoff from the developed area of Zones B1, B2, B3, and C will discharge from the site via overland and/or conveyance through the existing natural channels. The existing natural channels are primarily rock lined with sporadic natural shrubbery. Necessary drainage measures will be implemented to minimize degradation to the vegetation within the natural channels caused by any increased runoff during normal rainfall events. These measures may include providing detention to mitigate increases in runoff for the one-year and two-year occurrence intervals. Page 64 of 88 9 Two existing storm sewer lines traverse the Property from Rivery Boulevard to natural drainage channels that convey storm water to the existing water quality pond. These storm sewer lines were constructed as part of The Rivery Phase One Construction Plans by Urban Design Group as approved on June 4, 2002. The construction plans for the existing storm sewer lines do not indicate any storm sewer inlets to serve the Property. Additional engineering calculations shall be required as part of any site plan review process to determine if adequate capacity exists in the storm sewer lines to serve the Property. The existing topography appears to allow for direct discharge into the adjacent natural drainage channels that lead to the existing water quality pond. 8.2 Water Quality. The Property is located within the Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone according to the TCEQ USGS Quad Map. The Property must comply with the requirements of Chapter 11 of the Code and the Edwards Aquifer Rules of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). Zone A and the eastern 4.29 acres of the combined Zones B1, B2, and B3 contribute to the existing adjacent water quality pond maintained by the City. The existing wet pond is approved and regulated by TCEQ Edwards Aquifer Rules. All areas contributing to the existing water quality pond shall comply with the approved Water Pollution Abatement Plan (WPAP) as amended. However, the pond can be modified to serve a more intense development and/or capture additional areas of the Property, provided that any expansion is approved by the City’s Parks & Recreation Director and meets TCEQ Edwards Aquifer Rules. Pond modifications cannot diminish access to Rivery Park amenities, and existing amenities must be restored or improved following pond modifications.   The remaining tracts of land in Zones B1, B2, B3, and C will require water quality controls in accordance with the TCEQ Edwards Aquifer Rules. The water quality controls may be accomplished by: (a) Natural vegetative filter strips or one (1) additional wet water quality pond located within the City’s property known as Rivery Park – In order for natural vegetative filter strips or one (1) additional wet water quality pond to be viable and approved by the City, plans and analysis will have to be completed to ensure that utilizing the existing park area will: (i) not cause additional erosion within Rivery Park; (ii) not adversely impact the existing natural vegetation (grasses, brush, or trees) within Rivery Park; (iii) meet the minimum requirements established by TCEQ for vegetative filter strips. (b) Sedimentation/filtration or other TCEQ approved controls or by natural vegetative filter strip located within the City’s adjacent water quality pond located adjacent to the Rivery Boulevard Bridge – The existing water quality pond will have to be enlarged to accommodate any additional contributing area in accordance with the requirements of TCEQ and the City engineer. In order for this option to be viable and approved by the City, plans and analysis will have to be completed to ensure that utilizing Page 65 of 88 10 the City’s existing water quality pond along Rivery Boulevard will: (i) not cause additional erosion within Rivery Park; (ii) not adversely impact the existing natural vegetation (grasses, brush, or trees) within Rivery Park; and (iii) meet the minimum requirements established by TCEQ. (c) On-site water quality controls meeting the minimum requirements established by the TCEQ Edwards Aquifer rules – In order for this option to be viable and approved by the City, plans and analysis will have to be completed to ensure that utilizing on-site water quality controls will: (i) not cause additional erosion within Rivery Park; (ii) not adversely impact the existing natural vegetation (grasses, brush, or trees) within Rivery Park; and (iii) meet the minimum requirements established by TCEQ for vegetative filter strips. (d) A combination of two or more of the items above may be utilized to accomplish the required water quality requirements. All water quality control methods, location, and scale are subject to approval by the City by and through its City Engineer. 8.3 Grey Water Line. In the event that any owner of the Property intends to use or access the City’s grey water line in the future, an agreement between the developer and the City of Georgetown regarding access, use and easements will be necessary to enable the developer to access the City’s grey water line, which runs along the bank of the North Fork of the San Gabriel River and which is located in the City’s property known as Rivery Park, for the purposes of irrigation in Rivery Park and on the Property and for other uses as available, permitted, and agreed to by the City of Georgetown. In the event that connection occurs, connection to the City’s grey water line will be positioned along the Property’s most northern boundary so as to be least disruption to parkland on the east, unless otherwise approved by the Development Engineer. 9. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 9.1 Development on the Property shall comply with all environmental protection standards detailed in Chapter 11 of the Code, except as otherwise specified in this PUD. 10. ROADWAY INFRASTRUCTURE 10.1 The Property has approximately 2,020 feet of frontage along Rivery Boulevard, a divided arterial roadway. Rivery Boulevard has five (5) existing median cuts adjacent to the Property. Existing median cuts are as follows: (a) At the southwestern most corner of the Property, with an accompanying curb cut and public access road to Lot 1-1, Block A, of the Replat of Rivery Park, Lot 1, Block A, and Lot 1-2, Block A, of the Replat of Rivery Park, Lots 1-2 and 1-3, Block A; (b) At the southwest corner of Lot 1, Block A, of Rivery Park II subdivision, with no accompanying curb cut; Page 66 of 88 11 (c) At the proposed new Hershey Avenue as depicted on The Summit at Rivery Park Preliminary Plat, also being the existing curb cut and public access road to Rivery Park; (d) At the proposed extension of Wolf Ranch Parkway as depicted on The Summit at Rivery Park Preliminary Plat; and (e) At the proposed new Hintz Road as depicted on The Summit at Rivery Park Preliminary Plat. 10.2 The City of Georgetown transportation criteria require that a driveway on a divided arterial be separated by a minimum of 305 feet based upon the posted speed limit of 40 miles per hour, unless a waiver is approved by the City Engineer. No additional median cuts or alterations are proposed for this PUD. Curb cuts with internal driveways to access the Property will be utilized at each of the existing median cuts. Subject to a field study according to Section 3 of Chapter 2 of the TxDOT Design Manual showing stopping sight distances and attached as Exhibit “E”. 10.3 A Traffic Impact Analysis dated November 5, 2013 has been performed for this PUD. The Traffic Impact Analysis was not required by the existing PUD as amended and restated hereby. Nothing in this PUD shall require the owner of the Property to implement the Traffic Impact Analysis prior to development of the Property. 10.4 Driveway widths at all entries to the Property shall comply with Section 12.04 of the Code. 11. INTERNAL PEDESTRIAN & VEHICULAR CIRCULATION 11.1 The improvements within this PUD will be designed to maximize pedestrian and vehicular circulation within the Property, and all of the existing median and curb cuts will be integrated therein for ingress and egress from and to the Property. Construction of (i) two (2) additional curb cuts at existing median cuts along Rivery Boulevard in accordance with the Code; and (ii) one (1) additional curb cut without a corresponding median cut shall be permitted under this PUD to provide ingress and egress to and from the Property. The location of the additional curb cut described in (ii) above shall be subject to a field study according to Section 3 of Chapter 2 of the TxDOT Design and to approval by the City Engineer. This PUD will include pedestrian and vehicular circulation plans designed to provide access to all areas within Zone A, Zones B1, B2, and B3, and Zone C, and will incorporate homogenous design features for all Buildings and other improvements and appurtenances within the Property, and to provide reciprocal access between the Property and the City’s contiguous property known as Rivery Park. All designs for internal pedestrian and vehicular circulation shall comply with the Americans With Disabilities Act, as amended, and the Texas Accessibility Standards as codified in the Texas Architectural Barriers Act, Article 9102, Texas Revised Civil Statutes, as amended. Page 67 of 88 12 11.2 After final approval of this PUD, the general alignment of proposed internal pedestrian and vehicular circulation may be modified from that shown in Exhibit “B” to accommodate Building locations on the approved site plan(s) and for the protection of trees and fire safety requirements. It is the intent of this PUD that vehicular streets internal to the Property be considered as public streets. Design Details for public streets on the Property are depicted in Exhibit “C”, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as part of this PUD. Public streets within the Property shall be designated as Mixed Use Streets, Brownstone Streets, and Brownstone Alleys. 11.3 The horizontal and vertical curves in the Brownstone Streets and the Brownstone Alleys in Zone C shall be designed and posted for 20 miles per hour. 11.4 Utility depth in the Brownstone Streets cannot exceed ten (10) feet. Street trees will be planted in a manner which prevents root growth from interfering with underground utilities, sidewalks and curbs or other public infrastructure. Locations for street trees and utilities will be specified in plats and construction plans. 11.5 The Brownstone Alleys shall be maintained at no cost to the City. 11.6 Fire-rated vehicular access will be provided on at least two sides of the multi- story hotel(s). Alternate materials, such as grasscrete, may be used to provide access. 11.7 Individual site plans may utilize traffic calming methods in all Zones of the Property to slow traffic and to ensure pedestrian safety. 11.8 Planned pedestrian walkways on the Property will feature outdoor amenity areas and will be designed to connect to amenities located in the City’s property known as Rivery Park. Pedestrian access between Rivery Park and the Property is planned via at least two outdoor amenity areas. Pedestrian access must also be provided from Rivery Park to the public parking garage. 11.9 Vehicular access between the Property and Rivery Park will be maintained at all times via a roadway which will connect to a parking area in Rivery Park. The park access road may be relocated to the south side of the Property, providing that any relocation include a parking area with the same or an additional number of parking spaces as the existing parking area in Rivery Park. The park access road will be well marked for the public and noted by signage located on the Property’s perimeter and adjacent to Rivery Boulevard. 12. PARKING REQUIREMENTS 12.1 In Zone A, the parking shall comply with off-street parking and guest parking requirements for household living as prescribed in Table 9.02.030(A) of the Code. Parking requirements may be reduced if a Parking Study justifying the reduction is submitted with the Site Plan and approved by City Council. Page 68 of 88 13 12.2 A Rivery Hotel and Conference Center Parking Analysis was presented to the City Council on August 13, 2013 (the “Parking Analysis”) for Zone B; therefore, the following parking requirements shall apply in Zone B: Zone B1: Pursuant to the Rivery Hotel and Conference Center Parking Analysis presented to the City Council on August 13, 2013 (the “Parking Analysis”), a minimum of 336 parking spaces must be provided in a multilevel above-ground public Parking Garage located in Zone B1. An additional 27 parking spaces must also be provided to serve the uses in Zone B1, but may be provided as surface parking spaces in Zones B1, B2 or B3. Any additional off-site parking (over and above the minimum number of on-site parking spaces required in Zone B1), must comply with Section 9.02.050(B) of the Code. Zones B2 and B3: At least 445 parking spaces, plus any portion of the 27 surface parking spaces that are not located in Zone B1, must be in Zones B2 and B3. These spaces can be surface parking lot spaces or spaces in a parking garage; provided however, that the public Parking Garage servicing Zone B1 cannot be used to satisfy the requirement to provide parking spaces in Zones B2 and B3. Parking requirements may be reduced within Zones B2 and B3 by up to twenty percent (20%), if an updated Parking Analysis justifying the reduction is presented to and approved by City Council. 12.3 In Zone C, the Brownstone residential development, as defined in Section 6 of this PUD, parking shall comply with off-street parking and guest parking requirements for household living as prescribed in Table 9.02.030(A) of the Code. 12.4 Parking space dimensions for off-street parking in all Zones shall meet dimensions prescribed in Section 9.03.020 of the Code, except that drive aisle widths within a multi-level parking structure may be reduced to 24-feet. 13. LANDSCAPING, PRIVATE OPEN SPACE, COMMON RECREATION AREA & OUTDOOR AMENITY AREAS 13.1 Landscape Areas. Landscape requirements for this PUD shall meet all applicable requirements in Chapter 8 of the Code, unless otherwise stated. Bufferyards do not apply to this Property pursuant to Section 8.04.060 of the Code. The non-residential landscaping requirements of Chapter 8 of the UDC shall be applied to the Property. Individual site plans for the Property shall tabulate cumulative totals relative to landscaping for the Property. Street landscaping on the public streets within the Property shall fall under the landscape requirements for A and B Streets and for Alleys under the Zoning Regulations for Mixed Use Zoning Districts in order to accommodate the intended density of this PUD’s mixed use development. Page 69 of 88 14 13.2 Landscaping for individual brownstone lots shall be addressed on the site plan surrounding the lot and shall not be required on the individual lot. 13.3 Maintenance. The outdoor amenity areas, private open space, common recreation areas, sidewalks, trees, landscaping and irrigation in the rights of way and on the Property must be maintained at no cost to the City. 13.4 Private Open Space. For brownstone lots in Zone C, Private Open Space requirements outlined in Section 6.03.070(C)(3) of the Code shall be met by private rooftop decks on each unit. 13.5 Common Recreation Area. For brownstone development in Zone C, Common Recreation Area requirements outlined in Section 6.06.020 of the Code shall be met by a series of pocket parks internal to Zone C. Pocket parks will include trails and landscaped sitting areas and may include picnic areas or game court areas. In total, these pocket parks and Amenity Area “1” as detailed in Section 13.6(a) of this PUD shall satisfy requirements for Common Recreation Area in Zone C by meeting the combined total for square feet required per dwelling. These areas shall be reviewed and constructed in conjunction with the adjacent site plan. Common Recreation Area for any stand-alone multifamily development shall be addressed with the site plan review for that development. 13.6 Amenity Areas. The amenity areas within the Property shall be designed so as to complement and not conflict with the natural environment of the Property. The Property shall contain at least three (3) Amenity Areas. Each of these areas will incorporate a theme of natural elements and architecture to support this purpose. Amenity Areas “3” and “4” shall satisfy all requirements for Public Open Space and Common Recreation Area in Zone A and Zones B1, B2, and B3. Suggested Amenity Areas are depicted in Exhibit “B” as follows: (a) Amenity Area “1” – The Central Green, located in Zone C: This area will comprise a large, grassy open area between Buildings. Any improvements in this area will be constructed with materials and finishes that are compatible with those on adjacent Buildings within the Property. The design of this area may encompass gathering and sitting areas which will be visually attractive from within the Buildings adjacent to this area. This area may incorporate water feature(s) that complement an urban plaza and which may be artful in nature. (b) Amenity Area “3” – The Overlook Sector, located along the eastern perimeter of Zone A and Zone B1 of the Property: The Overlook Sector will serve as an extension of the outdoors to adjacent Buildings within the Property and designs for this area may include seating and viewing areas to serve pedestrians on the walkways that encircle the development areas of the Property. The design for this area will also comprise one of two major pedestrian walkways between the Property and Rivery Park. Hardscape Page 70 of 88 15 elements will be constructed with materials and finishes that complement the adjacent Buildings within the Property. The design of this area may include gathering and sitting areas along the eastern perimeter of the Property, and may include connectivity and access to other Amenity Areas. (c) Amenity Area “4” – The Pedestrian Plaza Sector, located on both sides of the vehicular street running in front of the hotel and conference center and connecting the Buildings in Zone A and Zones B1, B2, and B3 with the Central Green in Zone C: This area will serve as arrival areas and connections to and between the Buildings. This area shall be designed to provide for efficient pedestrian movement between all areas of the Property and may include viewing areas and corridors. Hardscape elements will be constructed with materials and finishes that complement the adjacent Buildings within the Property. The design of this area may include gathering and sitting areas, and may include connectivity and access to Amenity Area “1”. The design for this area shall also preserve the existing 37-inch caliper Live Oak creating a large shady plaza for outdoor seating. The seating area will provide a gathering spot overlooking Rivery Park and the North Fork of the San Gabriel River below. This area may incorporate water feature(s) that complement an urban plaza and which may be artful in nature. 13.7 Parkland Dedication. Fees will be paid in lieu of parkland dedication in an amount equal to $250 per new dwelling unit, except that, for each structure containing more than four (4) dwelling units, the fee shall be $200 per dwelling unit. For the purposes of this PUD and the calculation of fees, individually platted Brownstone dwellings in Zone C are considered individual dwelling units and parkland dedication fees shall be paid prior to final plat recordation. 13.8 Size and Design Approval. Specific size and design of pocket parks and amenity areas may vary from depictions in Exhibit “B”, but will be approved by the City as part of the individual site plans of any adjacent property. 13.9 Rivery Park Enhancements. Scope and design of enhancements to Rivery Park are as stated in the Parkland Improvements Agreement dated June 26, 2013 by and between the City and Brae Group, Ltd., and the Project Plan and Financing Plan for the Rivery Park Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone, as amended. 14. TREE PRESERVATION 14.1 A Tree Preservation Plan for the entire development, including mitigation, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council prior to the approval of any additional Site Plan. 15. BUILDING DESIGN & MATERIALS Page 71 of 88 16 15.1 With the exception of the Brownstone residential development in Zone C, as defined in Section 6 of this PUD, all Buildings designed for and constructed on the Property will comply with the Non-Residential Design Standards set forth in Section 7.04 of the Code unless otherwise provided for in this PUD. Any stand-alone multifamily constructed in Zone A shall also meet any applicable requirements of Chapter 6 of the UDC in addition to the applicable regulations of Chapter 7. 16. EXTERIOR LIGHTING 16.1 Exterior Lighting on the Property and its Buildings will comply with the requirements set forth in Section 7.05 of the Code related to outdoor lighting unless otherwise described in this PUD. 17. PUD MODIFICATIONS 17.1 This PUD represents the allowable uses and design standards for the five Zones contained within the Property. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Code, modifications to any provision of this PUD, the Site Layout, or Final Site Plan for the Hotel, Conference Center, or public Parking Garage, must be approved by City Council. 18. LIST OF EXHIBITS 18.1 The following exhibits are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference: (NOTE: Letter sized copies of each oversized exhibit must also be submitted.) A. Legal description of the Property. B. Site Layout, showing Zone boundaries, Park access, amenity areas and general pedestrian and vehicular circulation. C. Schematic Presentation of Street Design Details. D. Schematic Presentation of Brownstone lots and design. E. Field Study Showing Stopping Sight Distances. Page 72 of 88 17 EXHIBIT A – THE PROPERTY The Final Plat of BROWNSTONE AT THE SUMMIT PHASE 1, as recorded in Document Number 2011047662 of the Official Public Records of Williamson County, Texas, also being a replat of 0.604 acres previously described as part of Lot 4, Block “A”, THE RIVERY PARK II, a subdivision in Williamson County, Texas, according to the map or plat thereof recorded in Cabinet AA, Slides 20-23, Plat Records of Williamson County, Texas; The Final Plat of BROWNSTONE AT THE SUMMIT PHASES 2 – 4, as recorded in Document Number 2013070833 of the Official Public Records of Williamson County, Texas, also being a replat of 1.023 acres previously described as part of Lot 4, Block “A”, THE RIVERY PARK II, a subdivision in Williamson County, Texas, according to the map or plat thereof recorded in Cabinet AA, Slides 20-23, Plat Records of Williamson County, Texas; and The Final Plat of THE SUMMIT AT RIVERY PARK PHASES 5 – 6, as recorded in Document Number 2013116146 of the Official Public Records of Williamson County, Texas, also being a replat of 24.07 acres previously described as part of Lot 4, Block “A”, and Lots 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7, Block “A”, THE RIVERY PARK II, a subdivision in Williamson County, Texas, according to the map or plat thereof recorded in Cabinet AA, Slides 20-23, Plat Records of Williamson County, Texas, Lot 2, Block “A”, RIVERY PARK, a subdivision in Williamson County, Texas according to the map or plat thereof recorded in Cabinet W, Pages 212-214 of the Plat Records of Williamson County, Texas. The remaining portion, not otherwise described above, of The Summit at Rivery Park Preliminary Plat approved by the City’s Planning & Zoning Commission on October 31, 2012, being an unrecorded plat further described as: A portion of Lot 4, Block “A”, and Lots 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7, Block “A”, THE RIVERY PARK II, a subdivision in Williamson County, Texas, according to the map or plat thereof recorded in Cabinet AA, Slides 20-23, Plat Records of Williamson County, Texas; and Lot 2, Block “A”, RIVERY PARK, a subdivision in Williamson County, Texas according to the map or plat thereof recorded in Cabinet W, Pages 212-214 of the Plat Records of Williamson County, Texas. Page 73 of 88 Page 74 of 88 C Page 75 of 88 D Page 76 of 88 E Page 77 of 88 City of Georgetown, Texas Planning and Zoning November 1, 2016 SUBJECT: Public Hearing and p o s s ib le ac tion on a reques t to Rezone approximately 165.65 ac res desc rib ed as 142.80 ac res in the N. Porter and A. Flo res Surveys , 0.68 ac res , 5.07 ac res , and 12.31 ac res in the N. Porter Survey, and 4.79 acres, being Blo cks 1-3 of the No rth Georgetown Additio n, loc ated b etween Aus tin Ave. and N. C o llege St. s o uth o f FM 971, from the Res id ential Single-F amily (RS ) and Lo cal Commerc ial (C-1) Dis tric ts to the Public Fac ilities (PF ) Dis tric t. (REZ-2016--029, San Gabriel Park) Valerie Kreger, AICP, Princ ipal Planner ITEM SUMMARY: Background: The City o f G eo rgeto wn P arks and Rec reatio n Department has reques ted the San Gabriel Park and s urrounding c ity properties , 165.65 ac res total, b e rezoned from the Res idential Single-family (RS) and Loc al Co mmerc ial (C -1) d is tric ts to the Public Fac ilities (PF ) district. The majority o f the p ro p erty, the San Gab riel Park, has b een a pub lic p ark fo r over 50 years and will c o ntinue to b e s o. T he City has ap p ro ved a mas ter p lan to reno vate S an Gab riel Park inc lud ing pub lic res trooms, pavilions , p laygro und s , hike and bike trails, and parking and d riving areas . In ad ditio n to the ac tive park areas, sp o rts field s and playgrounds, the area to be rezoned includ es the Rec reation Center and Community Center, and properties the City o f Geo rgeto wn leas es to other o rganizations inc luding the Chamber o f Co mmerc e s ite, the Williams o n County Sherriff’s Pos s e R o d eo Arena, the VFW Po s t and the Masonic Lodge. The rezoning to the Pub lic Fac ilities d is tric t will no t affect the use o f any of thes e properties . Public comment: To d ate, s taff has rec eived no written p ublic c o mments , although staff has received numero us p hone inquiries . Staff Recommendation: Staff rec o mmend s approval of the reques t to rezone the 165.65 ac res to the P F Dis trict. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None studied at this time. SUBMITTED BY: Valerie Kreger, AICP, Principal Planner, and S o fia Nels o n, CNU-A, Planning Direc tor ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Staff Report Cover Memo Attachments 1-3 - Location, Future Land Use, and Zoning Maps Backup Material Page 78 of 88 Georgetown Planning Department Staff Report San Gabriel Park Rezoning Page 1 of 6 Report Date: October 27, 2016 File No.: REZ-2016-029 Project Planner: Valerie Kreger, AICP, Principal Planner Item Details Project Name: San Gabriel Park Rezoning Project Location: Between Austin Ave. and N. College St. south of FM 971 Total Acreage: 165.65 acres Existing Zoning: Residential Single-Family (RS) and Local Commercial (C-1) Proposed Zoning: Public Facilities (PF) Applicant’s Request The City of Georgetown Parks and Recreation Department has requested the San Gabriel Park and surrounding city properties, 165.65 acres total, be rezoned from the Residential Single-family (RS) and Local Commercial (C-1) districts to the Public Facilities (PF) district. The majority of the property, the San Gabriel Park, has been a public park for over 50 years and will continue to be so. The City has approved a master plan to renovate San Gabriel Park including public restrooms, pavilions, playgrounds, hike and bike trails, and parking and driving areas. In addition to the active park areas, sports fields and playgrounds, the area to be rezoned includes the Recreation Center and Community Center, and properties the City of Georgetown leases to other organizations including the Chamber of Commerce site, the Williamson County Sherriff’s Posse Rodeo Arena, the VFW Post and the Masonic Lodge. The rezoning to the Public Facilities district will not affect the use of any of these properties. Site Information Physical Characteristics: The 165 acres is mostly developed as parkland and public/nonprofit buildings with approximately a mile of the San Gabriel River running through the property. The land is fairly flat, except the change in elevation on either side of the river, and much of the area on the lower side of the river is within the floodplain. While tree coverage is generally not heavy throughout most of the property, there are significant trees, many Heritage size, nearer the river. The property is bounded by over 2,200 feet of frontage along N. Austin Avenue, over 1,100 feet along F.M. 971, approximately 1,000 feet along River Haven Drive, and almost 5,000 feet along N. College Street. Additionally, Chamber Way runs through the property as a public street and approximately 4,700 feet of E. Morrow Street runs through the property as a park road. Page 79 of 88 Planning Department Staff Report San Gabriel Park Rezoning Page 2 of 6 The current improvements on the city property include the Recreation Center, Community Center, Chamber of Commerce, Williamson County Sherriff’s Posse rodeo arena and show barn, VFW Post, Masonic Lodge, baseball and soccer fields, playscapes, pavilions, restrooms, hike and bike trails, and parking and driving areas. The facilities on the east side of N. College Street, including the Parks and Recreation Administrative building, animal shelter, and McMaster sports fields are not part of this rezoning. Page 80 of 88 Planning Department Staff Report San Gabriel Park Rezoning Page 3 of 6 Surrounding Properties: The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows: Utilities The property is in the City of Georgetown water, wastewater, and electric service areas. There is adequate capacity to serve the existing development and proposed improvements. Transportation The subject property has significant frontage along N. Austin Avenue, a Major Arterial on the City’s 2035 Thoroughfare Plan, and N. College Street, a Major Collector, each providing a bulk of the access to this property. Additional access is taken from E. Morrow Street, a Local Street, although it continues through the property as an internal park road. Access is also available to the adjacent residential area via E. Valley Street, although this access will potentially be eliminated with future park improvements. 2030 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use: This property is designated on the 2030 Plan Future Land Use Map as Parks, Recreation, and Protected Open Space, which applies to existing public parks, golf courses, and protected open spaces of city-wide significance that are expected to remain as open space in perpetuity. Location Zoning Future Land Use Existing Use North Residential Single-family (RS), Local Commercial (C-1) Moderate Density Residential Senior living facilities, multifamily South Residential Single-family (RS), Townhouse (TH), Agriculture (AG), Office (OF), Local Commercial (C-1), General Commercial (C-3) Parks Recreation and Protected Open Space, Employment Center Multifamily, business offices, open space East Residential Single-family (RS), Agriculture (AG), Public Facilities (PF) Parks Recreation and Protected Open Space, Institutional City properties, open space, undeveloped West Residential Single-family (RS), Local Commercial (C-1), General Commercial (C-3), Industrial (IN) Community Commercial, Specialty Mixed Use Retail center, bowling- alley, multifamily, single-family, undeveloped Page 81 of 88 Planning Department Staff Report San Gabriel Park Rezoning Page 4 of 6 Vision and Goals: The 2030 Plan’s Vision Statement identifies Quality of Life as the first value envisioned by the community for the City of Georgetown’s future. The Community Character envisioned under Quality of Life expresses the desire to expand public recreational use and enjoyment of the City’s parks and open spaces by expanding sports facilities and enhancing the network of greenways and trails linking major open spaces, recreational areas, rivers and lakes. The City’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan also cites goals for the City to accomplish its vision of the future, with the first of those being to promote sound, sustainable, and compact development patterns with balanced land uses, a variety of housing choices and well-integrated transportation, public facilities, and open space amenities. Growth Tier: In order to stage contiguous, compact, and incremental growth of the city over the next two decades, the 2030 Comprehensive Plan establishes a tiered growth framework. The 2030 Plan Growth Tier Map designation is Tier 1A, that portion of the city where infrastructure systems are in place, or can be economically provided and where the bulk of the city’s growth should be guided over the near term. Parks, Recreation and Trails Master Plan: The Georgetown Parks, Recreation and Trails Master Plan envisions parks as focal points of the community. In particular, the renovation and enhancement of San Gabriel Park into Georgetown’s “central park” is listed as one of the most important priorities for the City to pursue. Zoning District The Public Facilities (PF) District is intended to provide a location for government and other public or quasi-public facility operations. These may include schools, public parks, hospitals, airports, governmental offices, churches and other related uses, but would not include industrial facilities or storage yards. Some uses allowed in this district might generate heavy traffic volumes and high- intensity operations. The PF district is subject to non-residential design and landscaping standards for compatibility with nearby or adjacent residential uses. Page 82 of 88 Planning Department Staff Report San Gabriel Park Rezoning Page 5 of 6 Staff Analysis The majority of the property, the San Gabriel Park, has been a public park for over 50 years, which the City plans to update and renovate. The other existing uses included in the property being rezoned are public or quasi-public in nature. The PF District is intended for government and other public or quasi-public facilities such as schools, parks, governmental offices, churches and similar uses. The PF district allows uses that may generate heavy traffic, which the subject property can provide for as it has access to a Major Arterial roadway (N. Austin Avenue) and a Major Collector street (N. College Street). The 2030 Plan Future Land Use designation is Parks, Recreation, and Protected Open Space, which envisions public parks, golf courses, and significant protected open spaces expected to remain as such in perpetuity. The Plan’s Vision Statement expresses the community’s desire to expand public use and enjoyment of parks and open spaces. The Plan also includes the goal of promoting well- integrated transportation, public facilities, and open space amenities. The Parks, Recreation and Trails Master Plan identifies the renovation of San Gabriel Park into Georgetown’s “central park” as one of the most important priorities for the City. The PF district is intended for public facilities, including parks, while still allowing improvement of the public facilities currently located within the park. Staff has evaluated the request under the following rezoning criteria established in UDC Section 3.06.030 and has made the following findings: Criteria Finding The application is complete and the information contained within the application is sufficient and correct enough to allow adequate review and final action This application was reviewed by staff and deemed to be complete. The zoning change is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan The PF zoning district is consistent with the 2030 Plan as it best implements the parks and public facilities located within this area and shown as Parks, Recreation, and Protected Open Space on the Future Land Use Plan. The zoning change promotes the health, safety or general welfare of the City and the safe orderly, and healthful development of the City The development of these city properties is not proposed to change from its current use. However, the allowed uses and development standards of the PF district will promote the orderly and healthful development of the City should the uses or development of the property change. The zoning change is compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood The zoning change is compatible with the surrounding properties as many of the properties along the east side of this rezoning are public. Additionally, with the internal layout of the property, access to the adjacent residential area is minimal and will be further reduced with future improvements. Page 83 of 88 Planning Department Staff Report San Gabriel Park Rezoning Page 6 of 6 The property to be rezoned is suitable for uses permitted by the District that would be applied by the proposed amendment. The PF district is intended for public facilities and permits schools, parks and churches and does not permit uses, such as industry, that would be detrimental to the existing park. Findings: Based on all the information presented, staff has made the following findings: 1. The PF zoning district best implements the visions and goals of the 2030 Plan for this property, including protection and expansion of public parks. 2. The PF district allows for public facilities and parks, therefore allowing improvement of the public facilities currently located within the park as identified in the Parks, Recreation and Trails Master Plan. 3. The PF district is compatible with the public properties to the east of this rezoning and provides for buffers for the adjacent residential properties. 4. The subject property has access to a Major Arterial roadway and a Major Collector street, sufficient to handle any heavy traffic generated by PF uses. Access to the residential area is minimal and will be reduced with future improvements. Staff Recommendation Staff is recommending Approval of the application based on the above findings. Public Comments Public notice was mailed to property owners of 85 properties within a 200-foot radius of the subject property and within the city limits, a legal notice advertising the public hearing was placed in the Sun Newspaper on October 16, 2016, and signs were posted on-site. There have been no written public comments received at the time of this report, although staff has received numerous phone inquiries. Attachments Attachment 1 – Location Map Attachment 2 – Future Land Use Map Attachment 3 – Zoning Map Page 84 of 88 N IH 3 5 S O UTHW E S T E R N B L V D R I V E RY B L V D W I L L I A M S D R E U N IVERS I T Y AVE N A UST I N A VE S IH 35 NE I N N E R L O O P W UNIVERSITY AV E S M A I N S T H U T T O R S A U S T IN A V E §¨¦35 ¬«130 ") B OOTYS CROSSING RD LO O P E U NI V ERSIT Y A VE W I L L I A M S D R ")971 REZ-2016-029 Exhibit #1 Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US Feet Cartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only ¯ Location Map 00.51 Mi Legend Site Parcels City Limits Georgetown ETJ Page 85 of 88 N I H 3 5 R I V E RY B L V D N A U S T I N A V E S IH 3 5 S M A I N S T §¨¦35 W I L L I A M S D R Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US Feet Cartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only ¯ Future Land Use / Overall Transportation Plan Exhibit #2 REZ-2016-029 Legend Thoroughfare Future Land Use Institutional Regional Commercial Community Commercial Employment Center Low Density Residential Mining Mixed Use Community Mixed Use Neighborhood Center Moderate Density Residential Open Space Specialty Mixed Use Area Ag / Rural Residential Existing Collector Existing Freeway Existing Major Arterial Existing Minor Arterial Existing Ramp Proposed Collector Proposed Freeway Propsed Frontage Road Proposed Major Arterial Proposed Minor Arterial Proposed Railroad High Density Residential 0¼½¾ Mi Legend Site Parcels City Limits Georgetown ETJ Page 86 of 88 N I H 3 5 R I V E RY B L V D N A U S T I N A V E S IH 3 5 S M A I N S T §¨¦35 W I L L I A M S D R Zoning Information REZ-2016-029 Exhibit #3 Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US Feet Cartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only Legend Site Parcels City Limits Georgetown ETJ ¯ 0¼½¾ MiPage 87 of 88 City of Georgetown, Texas Planning and Zoning November 1, 2016 SUBJECT: Presentatio n and dis c us sion on Williams Drive S tud y. Jordan J. Mad d o x, AICP, Principal Planner ITEM SUMMARY: Update and d is c us s io n regarding the Williams Drive S tud y existing c o nditions report and the upc o ming week-lo ng des ign wo rks ho p in No vember. FINANCIAL IMPACT: . SUBMITTED BY: Jordan Maddo x Page 88 of 88