HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda_P&Z_11.07.2017Notice of Meeting for the
Planning and Zoning Commission
of the City of Georgetown
Nov ember 7, 2017 at 6:00 PM
at Council Chambers, 101 East 7th Street, Georgetown, TX 78626
The City o f G eo rgeto wn is committed to comp lianc e with the Americans with Dis abilities Ac t (ADA). If yo u
req uire as s is tanc e in participating at a p ublic meeting d ue to a disability, as d efined und er the ADA, reas onab le
as s is tance, ad ap tatio ns , or acc o mmo d ations will b e provid ed up o n req uest. P leas e c o ntact the City Sec retary's
Office, at leas t three (3) days prior to the sc hed uled meeting d ate, at (512) 930-3652 o r City Hall at 113 Eas t 8th
Street fo r add itional info rmation; TTY us ers ro ute through Relay Texas at 711.
Public Wishing to Address the Board
On a sub ject that is pos ted on this agend a: Pleas e fill out a speaker regis tration form which c an b e found at the
Bo ard meeting. C learly p rint yo ur name, the letter o f the item o n which yo u wis h to s p eak, and present it to the
Staff Liais o n, p referab ly p rio r to the s tart of the meeting. You will be called forward to speak when the Board
cons id ers that item.
On a sub ject not pos ted on the agend a: Pers ons may add an item to a future Bo ard agenda b y filing a written
req uest with the S taff Liaison no later than one week prior to the Board meeting. T he req uest mus t inc lude the
s p eaker's name and the s p ecific to p ic to b e ad d res s ed with sufficient information to info rm the b o ard and the
p ublic . For Board Liais on c o ntact info rmatio n, pleas e lo gon to
http://go vernment.georgetown.o rg/category/b o ard s -commissions /.
A As of th e d ea d lin e, n o p ersons were sign ed up to sp ea k on items other than those p osted on the a g enda.
Consent Agenda
The Statutory Cons ent Agenda inc ludes non-c o ntro versial and ro utine items that may be acted up o n with one
s ingle vo te. An item may b e pulled from the Cons ent Agenda in o rd er that it b e dis c us sed and acted up o n
individ ually as part of the Regular Agenda.
B Co nsideration of the Minutes from the O c to b er 17, 2017 meeting. Karen F ro s t, Recording Sec retary
C Co nsideration and possible actio n fo r a P reliminary F inal Plat for a two-lo t s ubdivis io n to b e known as the
Co unty Road (CR ) 107 Es tates Subdivis ion (P FP -2016-005) - And reina Davila-Quintero , Current Planning
Manager
Legislativ e Regular Agenda
D Public Hearing and possible action on a Subdivision Variance from the s treet c o nnectio n
requirements o f the Unified Development C o d e for the Co mb ined Preliminary and F inal Plat of the Echo
Park Subdivis io n generally lo cated at the inters ec tion of Kelley Drive and IH-35 (WAV-2017-003, Ec ho
Park) Nathan Jones -Meyer, Planner
E Public Hearing and possible action on a Subdivision Variance from the maximum bloc k length
requirements o f the Unified Development C o d e for the P reliminary Plat of the Lo s t Quarry S ubdivis ion
Page 1 of 87
loc ated at 3300 FM 2243 (WAV-2016-003, Lo s t Quarry) Nathan Jones -Meyer, P lanner
F Public Hearing and possible action on a req ues t to Rezone ap p ro ximately 4.40 acres in the Fis h Survey
loc ated at 4819 Williams Drive from the Neighborho o d Co mmercial (CN) Dis trict, to Loc al Co mmercial
(C-1) Distric t lo cated at 4819 Williams Drive (REZ-2017-022) - Andreina Davila-Quintero, Current
Planning Manager.
G Public Hearing and possible actio n o n a req ues t for a Special Use Permit to allow multi-family units in
the General C o mmercial (C-3) district, approximately 10.6 acres in the N. P o rter Survey loc ated at 1515
and 1531 Rivery Blvd. (SUP-2017-007, S ummit West) Chelsea Irb y, P lanner
H Public Hearing and possible action on a req ues t for a Special Use Permit to allow a s p ecial events
fac ility on the property lo cated at 511 S. Main Street, loc ated near the inters ec tio n o f Main S treet and E.
6th Street in the Mixed -Use Downto wn zo ning d is tric t (SUP-2017-008, Wis h Well Ho use). Nat Waggoner,
Lo ng Range Planning Manager
I Presentation o n a reques t to rezone app ro ximately 498.49 ac res to Planned Unit Develo p ment (PUD)
with base zoning of General Commerc ial C-3, Low Density Multifamily (MF -1), To wnhome (TH), Two -
Family (TF ) and R es id ential S ingle-Family (RS ). (REZ-2017-010 Highland Village, REZ-2017-012
So mers et Hills ) C hris Yanez, Assistant Planning Direc tor
J Up d ates:
2018 P lanning and Zo ning Meeting C alendar.
The next meeting o f the Planning & Zo ning Commission will be on Tues day, December 5, 2017.
Adjournment
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
I, Shelley No wling, C ity S ecretary fo r the C ity of Geo rgeto wn, Texas , d o hereby c ertify that this Notice of
Meeting was p o s ted at City Hall, 113 E. 8th Street, a p lace read ily acc es s ible to the general p ublic at all times ,
on the ______ d ay o f __________________, 2017, at __________, and remained so p o s ted fo r at leas t 72
c o ntinuo us ho urs p receding the sc heduled time o f s aid meeting.
____________________________________
S helley No wling, City Sec retary
Page 2 of 87
City of Georgetown, Texas
Planning and Zoning
November 7, 2017
SUBJECT:
Cons id eration o f the Minutes fro m the October 17, 2017 meeting. Karen Fros t, Rec o rd ing S ecretary
ITEM SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
NA
SUBMITTED BY:
Karen Fro s t, Rec o rd ing S ecretary
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Minutes _P&Z_10.17.2017 Backup Material
Page 3 of 87
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 1 of 2
October 17, 2017
City of Georgetown, Texas
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes
Tuesday October 17, 2017 at 6:00 p.m.
Council and Courts Building, located at 101 E 7th Street Georgetown, TX 78626
Commissioners present: Josh Schroeder, Chair; Aaron Albright, Alternate; Ercel Brashear; John Marler;
Travis Perthuis, Alternate; Kevin Pitts, Vice-Chair and Andy Webb
Absent: Tim Bargainer; and Alex Fuller, Secretary;
Staff Present: Sofia Nelson, Planning Director; Andreina Davila-Quintero, Current Planning Manager;
Nathan Jones, Planner; and Karen Frost, Recording Secretary.
A. Chair Schroeder called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Albright led the pledge of allegiance.
Chair Schroeder stated the order of the meeting and that those who speak must turn in a speaker form
to the recording secretary before the item that they wish to address begins. Each speaker is permitted
to address the Commission once for each item, for a maximum of three (3) minutes, unless otherwise
agreed to before the meeting begins.
• As of the deadline for this agenda, no persons were signed up to speak on items other than what was
posted on the agenda.
Consent Agenda
The Statutory Consent Agenda includes non-controversial and routine items that may be acted upon
with one single vote. An item may be pulled from the Consent Agenda in order that it be discussed and
acted upon individually as part of the Regular Agenda.
B. Consideration of the Minutes from the October 3, 2017 meeting. Karen Frost, Recording
Secretary
C. Consideration and possible action on the Plat Vacation of The Amended Plat of Georgetown
Gateway Phase A Section 1 (VAC-2017-001) Nathan Jones-Meyer, Planner
Motion by Pitts, second by Marler to approve the Consent Agenda. Approved 7 – 0.
Legislative Regular Agenda
D. Public Hearing and possible action on a request to Rezone approximately 3.235 acres in the
Porter Survey located at 2805 Mesquite Lane from the C-1 District to the MF-1 District.
(Mesquite Lane, REZ-2017-019) Andreina Davila-Quintero, Current Planning Manager
Davila presented the case. The rezoning is consistent with the code and the comprehensive
plan.
Chair Schroeder opened the public hearing and with no speakers coming forth closed it.
Motion by Pitts, second by Albright to recommend to Council approval of the rezoning of
2805 Mesquite Lane from c-1 District to MF-1 District. Approved 7 – 0.
E. Presentation and Update on the Comprehensive Plan Update- Nathaniel Waggoner, AICP,
Long Range Planning Manager
Waggoner gave a presentation explaining the proposed update of the comprehensive plan. It
Page 4 of 87
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 2
October 17, 2017
will encompass a total budget of $231,000: Comprehensive Plan revision, Housing Element,
Feasibility (Choice), and Williams Drive Sub-area plan. The project will take up to 18 months
and begin in January 2018.
The new plan will incorporate the City’s ongoing work to evaluate the cost-to -serve scenarios,
align Council goals and vision with development strategies, tools and community partners, and
synchronize other departments strategic plans. In the next 20 years, Georgetown will reach
nearly 100K in population which will bring opportunities to expand our employment and
economic bases.
The UDC identifies 14 gateways: Highway (4), scenic (6) and Downtown (4). The
Comprehensive Plan will establish goals for urban design, street context, public improvements
(TxDOT and CoG), and signage for these gateways.
A Steering Committee will be formed from different areas and boards within the city. Joint
meetings are proposed between P&Z and City Council, and the Steering Committee. The next
steps include developing and distribution of a Request for Proposal which will be sent out in
December. The consultant will be chosen, the steering committee formed and a consensus on a
public involvement plan will all be done in the first quarter of 2018.
Commissioners provided comments. Staff to keep the website updated. All Commissioners
agreed that transportation and updating the future land use map are very important, as is
communication and the impacts of the plan. It was also stated that the plan is great but that it is
static and that the plan is only as good as its updates. It must be kept up-to-date. It was also
mentioned that it would be very important, after the plan is adopted, to have more public
meetings and training sessions on how to use the tool. Overall, the commissioners were glad
this project is moving forward.
F. Updates:
The next meeting of the Planning & Zoning Commission will be on Tuesday, November 7, 2017.
Motion by Webb, second by Marler to adjourn at 6:51 pm.
____________________________________ ____________________________________
Josh Schroeder, Chair Attest, Kevin Pitts
Page 5 of 87
City of Georgetown, Texas
Planning and Zoning
November 7, 2017
SUBJECT:
Cons id eration and p o s s ib le ac tion for a Preliminary Final P lat fo r a two -lot s ub d ivis ion to be kno wn as the
County Road (C R) 107 Estates Sub d ivision (PF P-2016-005) - Andreina Davila-Quintero, Current Planning
Manager
ITEM SUMMARY:
Background
The 2.081-ac re s ubjec t p ro p erty is lo cated o n the no rth side o f CR 107, eas t o f the inters ectio n o f CR 107
and CR 100 within the City’s extraterrito rial juris dic tion (ET J). The proposed s ub d ivision c o nsists of two
(2) res id ential lo ts and no new streets. Additional right-o f-way will be d ed ic ated alo ng CR 107 thus
triggering the Preliminary Final P lat p ro cess.
Staff's Analysis
The p ro p o s ed Preliminary Final P lat meets all o f the req uirements o f the Unified Develo p ment Co d e for a
two -lo t s ubdivis ion.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None. The applic ant has paid the required ap p lic atio n fee.
SUBMITTED BY:
And reina Dávila-Quintero , Current Planning Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Staff Report Backup Material
Attachment I - Location Map Exhibit
Attachment II - Preliminary Final Plat Exhibit
Page 6 of 87
Georgetown Planning Department Staff Report
PFP-2016-005
CR 107 Estates Subdivision Plat Page 1 of 2
Report Date: November 3, 2017
File No: PFP-2016-005
Project Planner: Andreina Dávila-Quintero, Current Planning Manager
Item Details
Project Name: CR 107 Estates Subdivision
Project Address: 2451 CR 107, generally located on the north side of CR 107, east of the
intersection of CR 107 and CR 100
Total Acreage: 2.081 acres
Legal Description: 2.082 acres out of the John McQueen Survey, A-426
Applicant: Bryan Technical Services, Inc., c/o Bruce Bryan
Property Owner: Enrique Gallardo and Karla Garza
Overview of Applicant’s Request
The applicant is requesting approval of a Preliminary Final Plat for a two-lot residential subdivision to
be known as the CR 107 Estates Subdivision.
Page 7 of 87
Planning Department Staff Report
PFP-2016-005
CR 107 Estates Subdivision Plat Page 2 of 2
Site Information
Location:
The 2.081-acre subject property is located on the north side of CR 107, east of the intersection of CR
107 and CR 100 within the City’s extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ).
Physical Characteristics:
The subject property is comprised two 1.041-acre tracts totaling 2.081 acres. The subject property is
generally flat and contains no heritage trees.
Background
The subject property is located within the southern edge of the City’s ETJ and has an Agricultural Rural
Residential Future Land Use designation. The proposed subdivision requires dedication of right-of-way
along CR 107, thus triggering the Preliminary Final Plat process.
Utilities
The subject property is located within the Jonah Water Supply Corporation, and sanitary sewer
requirements will be accommodated by On-Site Septic Facilities (OSSF). Additionally, it is located
within the Oncor’s service area for Electric. It is anticipated that there is adequate water capacity at this
time to serve this property by existing capacity.
Transportation
The subject property has public access and street frontage along CR 107. Trip generation was not
reviewed with this subdivision application as the proposed two-lot subdivision does not trigger the need
for a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA).
Parkland Dedication
Parkland dedication requirements or fee in lieu are not required for the proposed two-lot subdivision.
Staff Analysis
The proposed Preliminary Final Plat meets all of the requirements of the Unified Development Code for
a two-lot subdivision.
Attachments
Attachment 1 – Location Map
Attachment 2 – Preliminary Final Plat
Page 8 of 87
¬«130
PFP-2016-005Exhibit #1
Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only
¯
Location Map
0 0.5 1Mi
Le ge ndSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
C R 1 0 7
C
R
1
0
0
U n i v e r s i t y B l v d
Chandler Rd
Page 9 of 87
ǻ
BRYAN TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.
,1
*
0
/
E
3
7
'
'
0
5
7
4
8
'
;
#$
5
6
4
#
%
6
0
1
)-'
+
6
*
5
7
4
8
'
;
#$
5
6
4
#
%
6
0
1
SHEET 1 OF 2
%+6;1()'14)'6190
241,'%601
(2ÄÄ
FINAL PLAT FOR
COUNTY ROAD 107 ESTATES
"ALL OF TRACT 1 AND TRACT 2 AS RECORDED IN A WARRANTY DEED RECORDED I N
DOC.#2010065976 OPRWC"
x
x
x
Page 10 of 87
¶
´
FINAL PLAT FOR
COUNTY ROAD 107 ESTATES
¶
SHEET 2 OF 2
"ALL OF TRACT 1 AND TRACT 2 AS RECORDED IN A WARRANTY DEED RECORDED I N
DOC.#2010065976 OPRWC"
%+6;1()'14)'6190
241,'%601
(2ÄÄ
Page 11 of 87
City of Georgetown, Texas
Planning and Zoning
November 7, 2017
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing and possible action on a Subdivision Variance fro m the s treet connec tion requirements
o f the Unified Develo p ment Co d e for the Combined P reliminary and Final P lat o f the Ec ho Park
Sub d ivision generally lo cated at the inters ection of Kelley Drive and IH-35 (WAV-2017-003, Ec ho Park)
Nathan Jo nes-Meyer, Planner
ITEM SUMMARY:
Background:
The s ubjec t s ite is p art o f a larger p ro p erty that b elo ngs to the Kelley Trust. In 2017, the s ite was annexed
into the City (Ord. 2017-36), and sub s eq uently rezo ned to the General Commerc ial (C-3) zo ning d is tric t
(Ord . 2017-45). The C ity Co uncil als o appro ved a S p ecial Use Permit (SUP) to allo w an auto -s ales us e
(Ord . 2017-47) o n the s ub ject site. The ap proved S UP inc luded a Co nc ept P lan to guid e future
d evelopment on the s ite. This Co nc ep t Plan s howed Kelley Drive end ing at its c urrent loc ation and no t
extending to the end o f the p ro p erty, as would b e required under the Unified Development Code (Sec tion
12.05.010 C.1 and C .2).
Staff Analysis:
According to the UDC Section 3.22.060, a subdivision variance may be approved, conditionally approved, or
disapproved by the P lanning and Zoning Commission. Approval requires a super-majority vote by the
Commission. At least four (4) of the five (5) approval criteria must be met for approval. Staff has found that
the requested variance satisfies all five (5) of the approval criteria.
Public Comment:
A to tal o f 9 notic es we mailed to the p ro p erty o wners loc ated within 200 feet o f the s ubjec t p ro p erty,
p o s ted o n the Williams on Co unty Sun on Oc to b er 22, 2017, and posted on s ite. To date, no written public
comments have b een received .
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None studied at this time.
SUBMITTED BY:
Nathan Jo nes-Meyer, Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
WAV-2017-003 Staff Report Backup Material
Attachment 1 - Location Map Backup Material
Attachment 2 - Preliminary Plat Backup Material
Attachment 3 - Letter of Intent Backup Material
Page 12 of 87
Georgetown Planning Department Staff Report
WAV-2017-003
Echo Park – Subdivision Variance Page 1 of 4
Report Date: November 3, 2017
File No: WAV-2017-003
Project Planner: Nathan Jones-Meyer, Planner
Item Details
Project Name: Echo Park
Project Address: Intersection of Kelley Drive and Gateway Drive, along North IH-35
Total Acreage: 12.228 acres
Legal Description: Portions of Georgetown Gateway AMD Phase A, Section 1, Lot 1 and
AW0491 AW0491 - Powell, J. Survey
Applicant: Charles Garcia, Freeman and Kauffman
Property Owner: Dale Illig, W.D. Kelley Foundation
Overview of Applicant’s Request
The applicant has requested a subdivision variance from the street connection requirements
of the Unified Development Code to waive the requirement to extend Kelley Drive into the
subject site across the plat.
Page 13 of 87
Planning Department Staff Report
WAV-2017-003
Echo Park – Subdivision Variance Page 2 of 4
Site Information
Location:
The subject site is located at the intersection of Kelley Drive and Gateway Drive, on the west
side of IH-35. It is part of the W.D. Kelley Foundation Kelley Trust. It is bordered by
undeveloped land to the north, Celebration Church to the east, IH-35 to the west, and several
auto sales business to the south.
Physical Characteristics:
The site is comprised of a portion of two (2) tracts totaling 12.228 acres. The site sits at the foot
of a hill, commonly referred to as Rabbit Hill. The site is covered in brush and, due to the
incline, would need to be cleared and leveled before development.
Background
The subject site is part of a larger property that belongs to the Kelley Trust. In 2017, the site
was annexed into the City (Ord. 2017-36), and subsequently rezoned to the General
Commercial (C-3) zoning district (Ord. 2017-45). The City Council also approved a Special Use
Permit (SUP) to allow an auto-sales use (Ord. 2017-47) on the subject site. The approved SUP
included a Concept Plan to guide future development on the site. This Concept Plan showed
Kelley Drive ending at its current location and not extending to the end of the property, as
would be required under the Unified Development Code (Section 12.05.010 C.1 and C.2).
Utilities
The subject site is located within the City’s service area for water and wastewater. Additionally,
it is located within the City and Oncor’s service area for Electric. It is anticipated that there is
adequate water capacity at this time to serve this property by existing capacity.
Transportation
The subject site’s current access is from a driveway curb cut on the IH-35 Frontage Road and
the street stub at the end of Kelley Drive. If approved, the Kelley Drive street stub will become
a secondary entry point for the site.
Trip generation will be reviewed with the Site Development Plan application, possibly
triggering the need for a TIA at that time. Cross access to future development adjacent to the
subject property will be required.
Staff Analysis
According to the UDC, a subdivision variance may be approved, conditionally approved, or
disapproved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Approval requires a super-majority
vote by the Commission. At least four (4) of the following factors are required for approval:
Page 14 of 87
Planning Department Staff Report
WAV-2017-003
Echo Park – Subdivision Variance Page 3 of 4
A. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety
or welfare or injurious to other property in the area or to the City in administering
this Code.
The subdivision variance will create a logical termini for Kelley Drive at the Echo Park
site, and will not result in a negative effect on the public health, safety, or welfare of
surrounding property. Emergency access to the site will not be effected by the
termination of Kelley Drive as the subject site will be accessible from Kelley Drive and
the IH-35 frontage road. In addition, pursuant to the Unified Development Code, cross
access will be required to adjacent property, thus allowing for safe pedestrian and
vehicular access to other developments.
B. That the granting of the variance would not substantially conflict with the
Comprehensive Plan and the purposes of this Code.
The granting of the variance does not conflict with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The
Overall Transportation Plan (a component of the Comprehensive Plan) identifies the
major thoroughfares within the City’s jurisdiction and calls for several transportation
projects in the area, namely the recently completed extension of Mays Boulevard located
southeast to the subject site. Kelley Drive is not one of these major transportation
corridors (thoroughfares) within the city. The Unified Development Code requires the
extension of all street stubs across platted lots in order to facilitate an orderly and
connected transportation network and improve traffic circulation. Upon review of the
this site in relation to the overall area, it is staff’s professional opinion that the extension
of Kelley Drive would not substantially improve traffic conditions for this area due to
the alternative north-south connectivity within the vicinity such as the IH-35 frontage
road and Rabbit Hill Road (classified as a major collector in the Overall Transportation
Plan). Finally, the request for a subdivision variance is in accordance with the conditions
approved with the Special Use Permit ordinance. The Concept Plan that is included with
the approved ordinance shows the termination of Kelley Drive at its current location.
C. That the conditions that create the need for the variance do not generally apply to
other property in the vicinity.
The extension of Kelley Drive would be located along the descending slope of Rabbit
Hill and would necessitate vertical and horizontal curves that are generally avoided in
roadway design. The roadway extension is not impossible but it would be difficult to
engineer and costly to construct. Many street stubs in the city face similar conditions as
a result of UDC standards (that have since been revised) that require street stubs for
future roadways. Fox Drive and Sierra Way Street are nearby examples of streets that
are required to extend across platted lots; however, in these cases, the topography is not
as severe as Kelley Drive and would not require the same degree of engineering.
Furthermore, the extension of these roads would result in a more efficient transportation
network that would address east-west connectivity for the area. The extension of Kelley
Page 15 of 87
Planning Department Staff Report
WAV-2017-003
Echo Park – Subdivision Variance Page 4 of 4
Drive would present a different set of engineering problems than those two examples
and would not serve the same function in terms of increasing traffic circulation
throughout the area.
D. That application of a provision of this Code will render subdivision of the land
impossible.
The extension of Kelley Drive would not render the subdivision of the land impossible.
The extension of the roadway does not result in lot sizes that are too small or do not
have frontage along a public road. However, it would bisect the site in such a way that
it would make large commercial development (consistent with the regional commercial
land use category) unfeasible or undesirable, particularly as a large portion of the site
would have no frontage along IH-35. The site’s L-shaped configuration will result in a
logical north boundary for the existing development at the northwest intersection of
Westinghouse Road and IH-35, and transition for future development north of the
subject site along the IH-35 frontage road.
E. Where the literal enforcement of these regulations would result in an unnecessary
hardship.
The enforcement of the regulation would result in an unnecessary hardship for the
developer. The extension of Kelley Drive would not significantly benefit traffic
circulation in the area; would impose unnecessary costs for the developer; and could
result in additional site constraints not conducive for an auto-sales facility or as a
regional commercial use due to the extension of Kelley Drive needing to be aligned
closer to the IH-35 frontage road and away from the bottom of the hill thus impacting
the depth of a new lot. Furthermore, it would render the proposed development as
depicted in the SUP Conceptual Plan impossible due to the storage and access needs
that are required by this project. They require large parking areas in order to advertise
their vehicular merchandise. These parking areas are often used as showrooms with
customers, sales representatives, and mechanics walking through each drive aisle. It is
important that these parking areas are not interrupted by through-traffic and that they
remain safe for pedestrian traffic.
Staff has found that the requested variance satisfies all five of the preceding factors.
Attachments
Attachment 1 – Location Map
Attachment 2 – Preliminary Plat
Attachment 3 – Letter of Intent
Page 16 of 87
W E S T I N G H O U S E R D
§¨¦35
WAV-2017-003Exhibit #1
Co o rdi nate System : Texas State Plane/Central Zo ne/N A D 83/US FeetCartographic D ata For Gener al Plann ing Pu rposes Only
¯
Location Map LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
0 0.25 0.5Mi
Page 17 of 87
'
'
'
'
'
8/29/2017
1" = 100'
NLM
FINAL PLAT - ECHOPARK REALTY TX SUBDIVISION
17-014
1 OF 1
NLM WILLIAM C. STAMPADOS, RPLS #5393
Antelope Surveying, Firm Reg. #10070700
Project Contact: Nick Mansfield
107 Hillcrest Avenue
Simpsonville, SC 29681
(864) 451-0176
nick@survey-matters.com
CITY PROJECT #__-2017-____
Page 18 of 87
FREELAND and KAUFFMAN, INC.
ENGINEERS !LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
209 West Stone Avenue !Greenville, South Carolina 29609 ! Telephone 864-233-5497 ! Fax 864-233-8915
September 7, 2017
To: Nathan Jones-Meyer
Planner
City of Georgetown
406 W. Eighth Street
Georgetown, TX 78626
From: Charles Garcia
Re: EchoPark Georgetown Subdivision Variance – Letter of Intent
Per the City of Georgetown Unified Development Code Section 12.05.010 “Street Network
Connections”, Kelley Drive should be extended through the proposed EchoPark development to
the parcel to the north. However, after the Development & Policy Review Committee Meeting
held on Monday, March 6th, 2017, it is the City of Georgetown staff’s position that Kelley Drive
does not need to be extended and would be in favor of a subdivision variance. Therefore, the
Site Plan associated with the Special Use Permit for the EchoPark development did not include
the extension of Kelley Drive. This Special Use Permit was approved at the August 22, 2017 City
Council Hearing.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to give me a call at 864-
672-3430 or e-mail me at cgarcia@fk-inc.com.
Sincerely,
Page 19 of 87
City of Georgetown, Texas
Planning and Zoning
November 7, 2017
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing and possible action on a Subdivision Variance fro m the maximum b lo ck length
req uirements of the Unified Develo p ment Code fo r the Preliminary Plat of the Los t Quarry Sub d ivision
lo cated at 3300 F M 2243 (WAV-2016-003, Los t Quarry) Nathan Jo nes-Meyer, Planner
ITEM SUMMARY:
Background:
The majo rity o f the s ubjec t s ite is loc ated within the C ity’s extra-territorial juris d ic tio n. The southern
p o rtion (appro ximately 14 ac res ) was annexed into the city o n Dec emb er 23, 2005 (Ord. 2005-101). At the
time o f annexatio n into the city limits, the d efault Agric ulture (AG) zo ning dis tric t was assigned. In 2016,
the portio n within the c ity limits was rezoned to the R es id ential Es tates (RE) zoning district (Ord. 2016-51).
A preliminary plat applic ation was sub mitted in mid -2016 and it is currently under Tec hnical Review.
Staff Analysis:
Ac cording to the UDC Sec tion 3.22.060, a s ub d ivis ion varianc e may be approved , cond itionally ap p ro ved ,
o r disapproved b y the P lanning and Zo ning C o mmis s io n. Approval requires a s up er-majo rity vo te b y the
Commission. At leas t four (4) of the five (5) ap p ro val criteria mus t b e met fo r approval. Staff has found
that the reques ted varianc e satis fies one (1) o f the five (5) ap p ro val criteria.
Public Comment:
A to tal o f 12 no tic es we mailed to the property owners lo cated within 200 feet of the sub ject property
within the city limits , p o s ted o n the Williams on C o unty S un on Oc tober 22, 2017, and posted on site. To
d ate, no written pub lic comments have been rec eived .
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None studied at this time.
SUBMITTED BY:
Nathan Jo nes-Meyer, Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Staff Report - Los t Quarry Cover Memo
Attachment 1 - Location Map Backup Material
Attachment 2 - Preliminary Plat Backup Material
Attachment 3 - Letter of Intent Backup Material
Page 20 of 87
Georgetown Planning Department Staff Report
WAV-2016-003
Lost Quarry – Subdivision Variance Page 1 of 5
Report Date: November 3, 2017
File No: WAV-2016-003
Project Planner: Nathan Jones-Meyer, Planner
Item Details
Project Name: Lost Quarry
Project Address: 3300 FM 2243 (Leander Road)
Total Acreage: 77.902 acres
Legal Description: 77.902 acres of the Joseph Thompson Survey
Applicant: Aaron Neumann, Matkin & Hoover
Property Owner: Eddie Vale, Vale Building Group, LLC
Overview of Applicant’s Request
The applicant has requested a subdivision variance from the maximum block length
requirements of the Unified Development Code to allow blocks that exceed the maximum
1,320 -foot block length requirement for roadways within the subject site.
Page 21 of 87
Planning Department Staff Report
WAV-2016-003
Lost Quarry – Subdivision Variance Page 2 of 5
Site Information
Location:
The subject site is located on the north side of FM 2243 (Leander Road), between County Road
176 and Weir Ranch Road in the southwestern portion of the city. It is bordered by the Water
Oak MUD to the north and west, and Texas Crushed Stone to the south and east.
Physical Characteristics:
The subject site is an irregularly shaped tract totaling approximately 78 acres with trees and
various shrubs throughout. The site is generally flat near its south end and along the frontage
with FM 2243. However, the topography decends suddenly into a valley near the center of the
site. There is a large water feature near the location that the elevation begins to decend and
there are numerous senstive features throughout the subject site. A tree survey was required
upon Preliminary Plat submittal to identify any protected or heritage trees. The property has
approximately 500 feet of street frontage with primary inbound and out bound access along
Leander Road.
Background
The majority of the subject site is located within the City’s extra-territorial jurisdiction. The
southern portion (approximately 14 acres) was annexed into the city on December 23, 2005
(Ord. 2005-101). At the time of annexation into the city limits, the default Agriculture (AG)
zoning district was assigned. In 2016, the portion within the city limits was rezoned to the
Residential Estates (RE) zoning district (Ord. 2016-51). A preliminary plat application was
submitted in mid-2016 and it is currently under Technical Review.
The applicant is seeking to develop the subject site as a residential single-family neighborhood
with the type of large lots that would be required under the RE zoning district (minimum lot
area 1 acre). Due to the natural features on the subject site, including many sensitive features,
the lot and roadway layout is constrained. The applicant has been required to coordinate with
the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality to show buildable lots with water quality
and sensitive feature buffers.
The applicant is seeking a subdivision variance in order to waive the block length requirement
under the Unified Development Code that was in place at the time of the initial submittal of
the preliminary plat. The relevant UDC requirement was Section 6.02.040 B, which stated that
block lengths could not exceed 20 lots or be longer than 1,320 feet, whichever is shorter . This
section of the UDC was amended in 2017 and was replaced with a requirement that restricted
intersection spacing to 1,320 feet. The reason for this change was to encourage connectivity
throughout the transportation system by setting the distance for intersection spacing and to
incorporate elements of the Williamson County Subdivision Regulations that limited the
distance between stopping conditions along roadways.
Page 22 of 87
Planning Department Staff Report
WAV-2016-003
Lost Quarry – Subdivision Variance Page 3 of 5
The applicant’s stated reason for requesting the variance is that the application of this cod e
would effectively prohibit or unreasonably restrict the utilization of the property due to its
shape, topography, and the location of sensitive features throughout the site.
Utilities
Water service is provided by the City of Georgetown, electric service is provided by PEC, and
sanitary sewer requirements will be accommodated by On-Site Septic Facilities (OSSF). It is
anticipated that there is adequate water capacity at this time to serve this property either by
existing capacity or developer participation in upgrades to infrastructure.
Transportation
The subject site’s current access is from FM 2243. The proposed preliminary plat provides two
additional street stubs to the adjoining Water Oak development. Right -of-way will be
dedicated for an arterial road that passes through the north end of the subject site at the time
of final plat recordation. Secondary fire access is proposed to be provided along an access
easement that runs the length of the site’s western edge.
Staff Analysis
According to the UDC, a subdivision variance may be approved, conditionally approved, or
disapproved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Approval requires a super -majority
vote by the Commission. At least four (4) of the following factors are required for approval:
A. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or
welfare or injurious to other property in the area or to the City in administering this
Code.
The subdivision variance will allow for at least two (2) blocks greater than 1,320 feet in
length (one that is nearly 1,800 feet and another that is nearly 1,400 feet). The current draft
of the preliminary plat also proposes a roadway length for Shelf Rock Road, classified as a
residential collector-level roadway, of nearly 3,000 feet between stopping conditions. The
distance between stopping conditions would act as a speedway by providing a built
environment that encourages high speeds by roadway users. Additionally, the types of
horizontal curves that are proposed, in conjunction with the vertical curves created by the
topographical changes throughout the subject site, would be difficult to maneuver. This
would create dangerous conditions for roadway users by mixing high speeds with rapidly
changing curvatures.
B. That the granting of the variance would not substantially conflict with the
Comprehensive Plan and the purposes of this Code.
The purpose of the maximum block length requirements is to restrict roadway lengths and
the distance between stopping conditions. Both the current requirement and the
requirement in place at the time of the initial application submittal sought to restrict
Page 23 of 87
Planning Department Staff Report
WAV-2016-003
Lost Quarry – Subdivision Variance Page 4 of 5
roadway lengths for reasons of safety as well as overall neighborhood design. The intent of
the UDC amendment was not to substantively change the requirement, but rather to further
clarify its purpose. The granting of this variance would conflict with the purpose of the
UDC by creating unsafe roadway conditions. It would also create a subdivision where large
residential lots are primarily served by one, long road. This is a type of neighborhood
design is vulnerable to the adverse impacts of sprawl and fragmentation that the 2030
Comprehensive Plan recommends to avoid.
C. That the conditions that create the need for the variance do not generally apply to other
property in the vicinity.
The conditions that create the need for the variance are not unique to this site. Due to the
size, shape, and location of mining activities within the vicinity and existing residential
developments, such as the Water Oak MUD, nearby “remainder” properties face similar
development constraints. Specifically, many nearby properties are long and narrow and are
limited in their ability to facilitate the type of roadway layout and intersection spacing that
is called for in the UDC. Many of the larger residential developments are self-contained and
do not provide very much cross access to adjoining properties. This has resulted in the need
for developments such as these to pursue innovative design options. . The site is unique,
however, in the type of design constraints presented by the natural features throughout the
site. The clustering of topographic and geologic constraints near the center of the site, and
along its most narrow section, are not typical to other developments in the nearby area.
D. That application of a provision of this Code will render subdivision of the land
impossible.
The application of the maximum block length requirements will not render the subdivision
of the land impossible. The requirement to limit block length does not conflict with other
standards of the UDC that govern this development nor would it result in unbuildable lots.
While the subject site has unique conditions, such as size, shape, environmental features
and adjacent mining activities, the proposed subdivision may be redesigned by adding
additional intersections or using an alternate roadway design in conformance with the
Code, thus allowing for the subdivision of the land.
E. Where the literal enforcement of these regulations would result in an unnecessary
hardship.
The enforcement of the regulation would not result in unnecessary hardship. In order to
adhere to the roadway standards, the developer may face the possibility of reduced overall
lot count from what is currently being proposed, or a redesign in different roadway design,
lot sizes and shape. The requirement to restrict the length of roadways is necessary in order
to promote safe roadway conditions and encourage compact, connected residential
development in the peripheral sections of the City and the ETJ.
Page 24 of 87
Planning Department Staff Report
WAV-2016-003
Lost Quarry – Subdivision Variance Page 5 of 5
Staff has found that the requested variance satisfies one of the preceding factors.
Attachments
Attachment 1 – Location Map
Attachment 2 – Preliminary Plat
Attachment 3 – Letter of Intent
Page 25 of 87
W University A
v
e
¬«29
Leander Rd
§¨¦35
§¨¦35
L e a n d e r R d
Leander R d
¬«29¬«29 W University Ave W University Ave
Wa
t
e
r
OakPkwy
G
a
b
r
i
e
l
F
o
r
e
s
t
C
e
d
a
r
H
o
l
l
o
w
R
d
(River/Stream)
(River/Stream)
(River/Stream)
WAV-2016-003Exhibit #1
Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only
¯
Location Map
R
o
n
a
l
d
R
e
a
g
a
n
B
l
v
d
0 0.5 1 1.5Mi
LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
Page 26 of 87
NEW RESIDENTIAL LOTS: 53
I GARRETT D. KELLER, REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER IN THE STATE OF TEXAS, DO
HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SUBDIVISION IS IN THE EDWARDS AQUIFER RECHARGE ZONE AND IS NOT
ENCROACHED BY A ZONE A FLOOD AREA, AS DENOTED HEREIN, AND AS DEFINED BY FEDERAL
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION FLOOD HAZARD BOUNDARY MAP, COMMUNITY PANEL
NUMBER 48491C0480E & 48491C0460E, EFFECTIVE DATE SEPTEMBER 26, 2008, AND THAT EACH LOT
CONFORMS TO THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN REGULATIONS.
THE FULLY DEVELOPED, CONCENTRATED STORMWATER RUNOFF RESULTING FROM THE ONE
HUNDRED (100) YEAR FREQUENCY STORM IS CONTAINED WITHIN THE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS SHOWN
AND/OR PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY DEDICATED BY THIS PLAT.
TO CERTIFY WHICH, WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL AT GEORGETOWN, WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS,
THIS ___ DAY OF JULY, 2017.
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
GARRETT D. KELLER, PE
NO. 111511 STATE OF TEXAS
I, JEFF BOERNER, REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF TEXAS, DO
HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT IS TRUE AND CORRECTLY MADE FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE
ON THE GROUND OF THE PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED HEREON, AND THAT THERE ARE NO
APPARENT DISCREPANCIES, CONFLICTS, OVERLAPPING OF IMPROVEMENTS, VISIBLE UTILITY LINES
OR ROADS IN PLACE, EXCEPT AS SHOWN ON THE ACCOMPANYING PLAT, AND THAT THE CORNER
MONUMENTS SHOWN THEREON WERE PROPERLY PLACED UNDER MY SUPERVISION IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS.
TO CERTIFY WHICH, WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL AT GEORGETOWN , WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS,
THIS ___ DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2016.
REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR
JEFF BOERNER, R.P.L.S.
MATKIN HOOVER
ENGINEERING & SURVEYING
C/O GARRETT D. KELLER, P.E.
8 SPENCER ROAD SUITE 100
BOERNE, TEXAS 78006
OFF: (830) 249-0600
FAX: (830) 249-0099
GKELLER@MATKINHOOVER.COM
LOST QUARRY
PRELIMINARY PLAT
VICINITY MAP
1'' = 6000'
OWNER/DEVELOPER:AGENT/PREPARER:
BEING A 77.902 ACRE TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE J. THOMPSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 608,
THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING THAT CERTAIN CALLED 77.930
ACRE TRACT RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2008085977, OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF
WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS
NOTES:
1.ACREAGE OF SUBDIVISION = 77.902 ACRES. THE OVERALL AVERAGE DENSITY OF LOTS IN THIS SUBDIVISION IS 1.469 AC/LOT.
2.WATER SERVICE FOR THIS SUBDIVISION WILL BE PROVIDED BY CITY OF GEORGETOWN.
3.SEWER SERVICE FOR THIS SUBDIVISION WILL BE PROVIDED BY ON-SITE SEWAGE FACILITIES.
4.ELECTRIC SERVICES FOR THIS SUBDIVISION WILL BE PROVIDE BY PEDERNALES ELECTRIC COMPANY.
5.POSTAL SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED BY CLUSTER BOXES AT THE ENTRANCE OF THE SUBDIVISION
6.ALL PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE FOR UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE
AND/OR CATV LINES AND APPURTENANCES.
7.ALL STRUCTURES/OBSTRUCTIONS ARE PROHIBITED IN DRAINAGE EASEMENTS.
8.BASIS OF BEARING: WAS ESTABLISHED USING THE TRIMBLE VRS NETWORK, NAD83, TEXAS STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM,
CENTAL ZONE 4203, US SURVEY FOOT, GRID. THE MONUMENTS OF THIS PLAT HAVE BEEN ROTATED TO THE NAD 83/93 HARN -
TEXAS CENTRAL ZONE AND THE NAVD 88.
9.ALL PUBLIC ROADWAYS AND EASEMENTS AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT ARE FREE OF LIENS. REQUIRED RELEASE OF LIENS SHALL BE
PROVIDED TO THE COMMISSIONERS' COURT.
10.IN ORDER TO PROMOTE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM A STRUCTURE, THE SLAB ELEVATION SHOULD BE BUILT AT LEAST ONE-FOOT
ABOVE THE SURROUNDING GROUND, AND THE GROUND SHOULD BE GRADED AWAY FROM THE STRUCTURE AT A SLOPE OF 1/2"
PER FOOT FOR A DISTANCE OF AT LEAST 10 FEET.
11.THE LANDOWNER ASSUMES ALL RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, OR ROAD
WIDENING EASEMENTS. BY PLACES ANYTHING IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OR ROAD WIDENING EASEMENTS, THE LAND OWNER
INDEMNIFIES AND HOLDS THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, WILLIAMSON COUNTY, THEIR OFFICERS, AGENTS AND EMPLOYEES
HARMLESS FROM ANY LIABILITY OWING TO PROPERTY DEFECTS OR NEGLIGENCE NOT ATTRIBUTED TO THEM AND
ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS MAY BE REMOVED BY THE CITY AND/OR COUNTY AND THAT THE OWNER OF THE
IMPROVEMENTS WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE RELOCATION AND/OR REPLACEMENT OF THE IMPROVEMENTS.
12.PARKLAND DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE BEING MET BY FEE-IN-LIEU OF DEDICATION.
13.ANY HERITAGE TREE AS NOTED ON THIS PLAT IS SUBJECT, IN PERPETUITY, TO THE MAINTENANCE, CARE, PRUNING AND
REMOVAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, AND APPROVED REMOVAL DOES NOT REQUIRE MODIFICATION OF
THE PLAT.
14.A 10-FOOT PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT IS RESERVED ALONG ALL STREET FRONTAGES WITHIN THIS PLAT.
15.THE MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE PER RESIDENTIAL LOT IS 6,679 SF.
16.THE BUILDING OF ALL STREETS, ROADS, AND OTHER PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES AND ANY BRIDGES OR CULVERTS NECESSARY
TO BE CONSTRUCTED OR PLACED IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNERS OF THE TRACT OF LAND COVERED BY THIS PLAT IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS PRESCRIBED BY THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN AND/OR WILLIAMSON
COUNTY, TEXAS. NEITHER THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN NOR WILLIAMSON COUNTY ASSUMES ANY OBLIGATION TO BUILD ANY OF
THE STREETS, ROADS, OR OTHER PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES SHOWN ON THIS PLAT OR OF CONSTRUCTING ANY OF THE
BRIDGES OR DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. NEITHER THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN NOR WILLIAMSON
COUNTY ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR DRAINAGE WAYS OR EASEMENTS IN THE SUBDIVISION, OTHER THAN THOSE
DRAINING OR PROTECTING THE ROAD SYSTEM AND STREETS IN THEIR RESPECTIVE JURISDICTIONS.
17.NEITHER THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN NOR WILLIAMSON COUNTY ASSUMES ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OF
REPRESENTATIONS BY OTHER PARTIES IN THIS PLAT. FLOODPLAIN DATA, IN PARTICULAR, MAY CHANGE DEPENDING ON
SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENT. IT IS FURTHER UNDERSTOOD THAT THE OWNERS OF THE TRACT OF LAND COVERED BY THIS PLAT
MUST INSTALL AT THEIR OWN EXPENSE ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AND SIGNAGE THAT MAY BE REQUIRED BEFORE THE
STREETS IN THE SUBDIVISION HAVE FINALLY BEEN ACCEPTED FOR MAINTENANCE BY THE CITY AND / OR COUNTY.
18.THERE ARE NO AREAS WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THIS SUBDIVISION IN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN AS DEFINED BY FIRM MAP
NUMBER 48491C0480E & 48491C0460E, EFFECTIVE DATE OF 9/26/2008.
19.RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENTS FOR WIDENING ROADWAYS OR IMPROVING DRAINAGE SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE LAND OWNER
UNTIL ROAD OR DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ARE ACTUALLY CONSTRUCTED ON THE PROPERTY. THE CITY AND/OR COUNTY HAVE
THE RIGHT AT ANY TIME TO TAKE POSSESSION OF ANY ROAD WIDENING EASEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION, IMPROVEMENT, OR
MAINTENANCE OF THE ADJACENT ROAD.
20.ON-SITE SEWAGE FACILITIES MUST BE DESIGNED BY A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER OR REGISTERED SANITARIAN.
21.NO CONSTRUCTION IN THE SUBDIVISION MAY BEGIN UNTIL THE TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY (TCEQ) HAS
APPROVED THE WATER POLLUTION ABATEMENT PLAN (WPAP) IN WRITING.
22.DRIVEWAYS FOR LOTS 11, 12, 13 AND 14 BLOCK F SHALL CONNECT ONLY TO SHELL ROCK ROAD AND NOT DIRECTLY TO RANCH
ROAD 2243.
23.THIS PLAT IS SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN WATER CONSERVATION ORDINANCE. IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE ORDINANCE, IRRIGATION SYSTEMS INSTALLED ON RESIDENTIAL LOTS MAY NOT IRRIGATE AN AREA
LARGER THAN 2.5 TIMES THE HOUSE FOUNDATION FOOTPRINT OR 10,000 SQUARE FEET, WHICHEVER IS THE SMALLER, WITH
SPRAY OR ROTOR IRRIGATION HEADS. THE USE OF DRIP IRRIGATION, BUBBLERS, OR MICRO-SPRAYERS MAY BE USED TO
EXPAND THE IRRIGATION COVERAGE AREA.
24.THE SUBDIVISION SUBJECT TO THIS APPLICATION IS SUBJECT TO THE WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS OF THE CITY OF
GEORGETOWN.
25.A GEOLOGIC ASSESSMENT, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS, WAS
COMPLETED ON JUNE 8, 2016. ANY SPRINGS AND STREAMS AS IDENTIFIED IN THE GEOLOGIC ASSESSMENT ARE SHOWN HEREIN.
26.EXCEPT AS SHOWN, ALL CORNERS ARE 1/2" IRON RODS.
27.THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN WATER QUALITY AND SENSITIVE FEATURE BUFFER ZONE IS A NATURAL GEOLOGICAL FEATURE
BUFFER ZONE (NON CONSTRUCTION/ LANDSCAPE EASEMENT). NO ALTERATION WITHIN THE NATURAL TERRAIN OR VEGETATION
SHALL OCCUR WITHIN THIS EASEMENT. NO STORM WATER FLOW SHALL BE DIRECTED TOWARDS THIS EASEMENT. THE
PROPERTY OR HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE BUFFER ZONE AND REMOVAL
OF ANY TRASH OR DEBRIS FOUND WITHIN THE BUFFER ZONE.
28.ONE-WAY "CIRCULAR" DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE PROHIBITED. EACH LOT SHALL BE ALLOWED ONE ACCESS POINT TO THE COUNTY
ROAD WITH A MINIMUM DRIVEWAY SPACING OF 120' FOR ANY ADJOINING DRIVEWAY.
29.A LOCKED GATE WITH A KNOX PAD LOCK SHALL BE INSTALLED WHERE THE EMERGENCY ACCESS ROAD CONNECTS TO SHELL
ROCK ROAD, LIVE ROCK ROAD, & F.M. 2243 AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED THE PROPERTY OR HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION.
30.PRIVATE ACCESS TO THE EMERGENCY ACCESS ROAD IS PROHIBITED TO ALL LOTS WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION. NO
OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN THE EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT (I.E. FENCING, LANDSCAPING, ETC).
31.A RESIDENTIAL BOUNDARY WALL SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ALONG F.M. 2243 AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE PROPERTY OR
HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION.
32.ALL LOTS SHALL HAVE MANICURED LAWN WITH AN AREA EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN 280% OF THE TOTAL IMPERVIOUS COVER
PROPOSED ON THE LOT INCLUDING THE HOUSE FOUNDATION FOOTPRINT, SIDEWALKS, AND DRIVEWAYS.
FOR EXAMPLE:
IF THE PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS COVER = 6,500 SF X 2.80 = 18,200 SF OF REQUIRED MANICURED LAWN*
*MANICURED LAWN IS DEFINED AS SOD PLACED AROUND THE RESIDENCE WITH AN IRRIGATION SYSTEM. REFER TO NOTE FOR
ADDITIONAL RESTRICTION ON LAWN IRRIGATION.
33.
EDDIE VALE
VALE BUILDING GROUP, LLC
2301 FEDERAL ST
KILLEEN, TX 76543
(254) 690-1371
EDWARDOVALE@GMAIL.COM
SITE
A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR A SUBDIVISION TO BE KNOWN AS LOST QUARRRY HAS BEEN APPROVED
ACCORDING TO THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE GEORGETOWN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
ON THE DAY OF ,20 . A.D.
JOSH SCHROEDER, CHAIRMAN DATE
DATE
ENGINEERING
& SURVEYING
CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS LAND PLANNERS CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS CONSULTANTS
P.O. BOX 54
8 SPENCER ROAD SUITE 100
BOERNE, TEXAS 78006
OFFICE: 830.249.0600 FAX:830.249.0099TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-004512TEXAS REGISTERED SURVEYING FIRM F-10024000
F.M. 2243
HWY 29
F.M. 175
C
E
D
A
R
H
A
L
L
O
W
R
O
N
A
L
D
R
E
A
G
A
N
B
L
V
D
.
SHELF ROCK ROAD6524 50
LOST QUARRY LANE267 50
ROCK RIVER ROAD240 50
LIVE ROCK ROAD153 50
STREET SUMMARY TABLE
STREET (LF)ROW WIDTH
LAND USEPHASE 1 PHASE 2 TOTAL
SITE ACREAGE37.1 40.8 77.9
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS26 27 53
LOCAL STREET (LF)3,681 3,502 7,183
DENSITY (LOTS/ACRE)1.427 1.511 1.469
PROJECT LAND SUMMARY
PARKLAND LOT1 0 1
OPEN SPACE LOT4 3 7
TOTAL BLOCKS3 3 6
CITY OF GEORGETOWN ETJ
TOTAL LOTS31 30 61
REQUIRED FIRE
FLOW (GPM)
DWELLING
SIZE
MINIMUM EXPOSURE
DISTANCE
1,000 0 - 5,000 SQFT 31FT OR GREATER
1,000 0 - 3,600 SQFT 11 FT - 30 FT
1,500 3,601 - 5,000 SQFT 11 FT - 30 FT
DATE: JULY 2017
CITY PROJECT NO. -
PP-2016-011
Page 27 of 87
LOT 1
1.19 AC.
LOT 2
1.14 AC.
LOT 3
1.12 AC.
LOT 4
1.01 AC.
LOT 5
1.01 AC.
LOT 6
1.01 AC.
LOT 7
1.01 AC.
LOT 8
1.01 AC.LOT 9
1.01 AC.
LOT 10
1.11 AC.
LOT 11
1.08 AC.
LOT 12
1.01 AC.
LOT 13
1.01 AC.
LOT 14
1.16 AC.
LOT 15
1.70 AC.
LOT 16
1.27 AC.LOT 17
1.44 AC.
LOT 18
1.64 AC.
LOT 19
1.57 AC.
LOT 20
1.20 AC.
LOT 21
1.12 AC.
LOT 22
1.10 AC.
LOT 23
1.06 AC.
LOT 24
1.05 AC.
LOT 25
1.01 AC.
LOT 26
1.67 AC.
LOT 1
1.01 AC.
LOT 2
1.01 AC.
LOT 3
1.01 AC.LOT 4
1.31 AC.LOT 5
1.11 AC.
LOT 6
1.20 AC.
LOT 7
1.22 AC.
LOT 8
1.03 AC.
LOT 1
1.01 AC.
LOT 2
1.13 AC.
LOT 3
1.05 AC.
LOT 4
1.29 AC.
LOT 1
3.12 AC.LOT 1
1.19 AC.
LOT 2
1.15 AC.
LOT 3
1.11 AC.
LOT 4
1.11 AC.
LOT 5
1.11 AC.LOT 6
1.15 AC.
LOT 7
1.01 AC.
LOT 8
1.02 AC.
LOT 9
1.01 AC.
LOT 10
1.01 AC.LOT 11
1.01 AC.
LOT 12
1.01 AC.
LOT 13
1.01 AC.
LOT 14
1.09 AC.
LOT 500
0.00 AC.LOT 501 - 0.66 AC.
LOT 502
3.87 AC.
MATKIN HOOVER
ENGINEERING & SURVEYING
AARON NEUMANN, P.E.
8 SPENCER ROAD SUITE 100
BOERNE, TEXAS 78006
OFF: (830) 249-0600
FAX: (830) 249-0099
GKELLER@MATKINHOOVER.COM
OWNER/DEVELOPER:AGENT/PREPARER:
ENGINEERING
& SURVEYING
CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS LAND PLANNERS CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS CONSULTANTS
P.O. BOX 54
8 SPENCER ROAD SUITE 100
BOERNE, TEXAS 78006
OFFICE: 830.249.0600 FAX:830.249.0099
TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-004512
TEXAS REGISTERED SURVEYING FIRM F-10024000
EDWIN H. VALE JR.
2301 FEDERAL ST.
KILLEEN, TX 26543
SCALE: 1"=300'
0 150'300'450'600'
BEING A 77.902 ACRE TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE J. THOMPSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 608, WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING THAT CERTAIN 77.902 ACRE TRACT RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2016064533, OFFICIAL PUBLIC
RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, SAID 77.902 ACRE TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A ½” IRON ROD FOUND IN THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF F.M. 2243 AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED TRACT, THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF A CALLED 195.193 ACRE TRACT RECORDED IN
DOCUMENT NO. 2007014280, OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS;
(1)THENCE, N 20° 54' 49" W, DEPARTING THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF F.M. 2243 (80' RIGHT-OF-WAY), WITH THE SOUTHWEST BOUNDARY LINE OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED TRACT, WITH THE NORTHEAST BOUNDARY LINE OF THE
CALLED 195.193 ACRE TRACT, A DISTANCE OF 3790.27' TO A “PK” NAIL FOUND FOR INTERIOR CORNER, THE NORTH CORNER OF THE CALLED 195.193 ACRE TRACT;
(2)THENCE, WITH A SOUTHEAST BOUNDARY LINE OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED TRACT, THE NORTHWEST BOUNDARY LINE OF THE CALLED 195.193 ACRE TRACT, THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES:
a.S 68° 08' 47" W, 1031.64' TO A 2” IRON PIPE FOUND FOR ANGLE;
b.S 68° 08' 51" W, 617.55' TO A ½” IRON ROD FOUND WITH RED “FOREST 1847” PLASTIC CAP FOUND FOR ANGLE;
c.S 67° 58' 05" W, 242.04' TO A ½” IRON ROD FOUND WITH YELLOW “BURY & PARTNERS” PLASTIC CAP FOR CORNER AT THE NORTHERLY SOUTH CORNER OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED TRACT, THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF A CALLED
78.399 ACRE TRACT RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2007014290, OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT;
(1)THENCE, DEPARTING THE NORTHWEST BOUNDARY LINE OF THE CALLED 195.193 ACRE TRACT, WITH THE WEST BOUNDARY LINE OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED TRACT, WITH THE EAST BOUNDARY LINE OF THE CALLED 78.399 ACRE
TRACT AND THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 1380.00', A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 34°46'19”, AN ARC LENGTH OF 837.50', AND A CHORD WHICH BEARS N 03° 18' 39" E, A DISTANCE OF 824.71' TO A ½” IRON ROD
FOUND WITH YELLOW “BURY & PARTNERS” PLASTIC CAP FOR CORNER AT A NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE CALLED 78.399 ACRE TRACT, AN ANGLE POINT IN THE SOUTH BOUNDARY LINE OF A CALLED 203.137 ACRE TRACT RECORDED
IN DOCUMENT NO. 2007014282, OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS;
(2)THENCE, WITH THE NORTH BOUNDARY LINE OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED TRACT, THE SOUTH BOUNDARY LINE OF THE CALLED 203.137 ACRE TRACT, THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES:
a.N 80° 41' 16" E, 714.45' TO A COTTON SPINDLE FOUND FOR ANGLE;
b.N 75° 43' 57" E, 433.36' TO A COTTON SPINDLE FOUND FOR ANGLE;
c.N 71° 41' 22" E, 180.17' TO A ½” IRON ROD FOUND WITH YELLOW “BURY & PARTNERS” PLASTIC CAP FOR ANGLE;
d.N 84° 13' 39" E, 214.23' TO A ½” IRON ROD FOUND WITH YELLOW “BURY & PARTNERS” PLASTIC CAP FOR ANGLE;
e.S 68° 45' 41" E, 137.76' TO A ½” IRON ROD FOUND WITH YELLOW “BURY & PARTNERS” PLASTIC CAP FOR ANGLE;
f.S 36° 38' 20" E, 381.62' TO A COTTON SPINDLE FOUND FOR INTERIOR CORNER;
g.N 68° 17' 44" E, AT A DISTANCE OF 128.65' PASS THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE CALLED 203.137 ACRE TRACT, THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF A CALLED 190.40 ACRE TRACT RECORDED IN VOLUME 743, PAGE 47, DEED RECORDS
OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, A TOTAL DISTANCE OF 153.39' TO A 3/8” IRON ROD FOUND FOR ANGLE;
(1)THENCE, S 77° 06' 17" E, WITH A NORTHEAST BOUNDARY LINE OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED TRACT, A SOUTHWEST BOUNDARY LINE OF THE CALLED 190.40 ACRE TRACT, A DISTANCE OF 149.29' TO A 3/8” IRON ROD FOUND FOR ANGLE
AT A SOUTHERN CORNER OF THE CALLED 190.40 ACRE TRACT, A WEST CORNER OF A CALLED 416.78 ACRE TRACT RECORDED IN VOLUME 740, PAGE 530, DEED RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS;
(2)THENCE, WITH A NORTHEAST BOUNDARY LINE OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED TRACT, A SOUTHWEST BOUNDARY LINE OF THE CALLED 461.78 ACRE TRACT, THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES:
a.S 50° 58' 13" E, 308.89' TO A CALCULATED POINT FOR ANGLE;
b.S 76° 00' 12" E, 18.17' TO A COTTON SPINDLE FOUND FOR ANGLE;
c.S 20° 17' 31" E, 470.42' TO A ½” IRON ROD FOUND WITH YELLOW “BURY & PARTNERS” PLASTIC CAP FOR ANGLE;
d.S 20° 55' 59" E, 791.45' TO A 60D NAIL FOUND FOR ANGLE;
e.S 20° 27' 34" E, 1474.58' TO A 1/2” IRON ROD FOUND FOR ANGLE;
f.S 20° 40' 02" E, 707.04' TO A ½” IRON ROD FOUND WITH YELLOW “BURY & PARTNERS” PLASTIC CAP FOR CORNER AT THE SOUTH CORNER OF THE CALLED 416.78 ACRE TRACT, IN THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF F.M. 2243,
SAID POINT BEING IN THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT;
(1)THENCE, WITH THE SOUTH BOUNDARY LINE OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED TRACT, THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF F.M. 2243, THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES:
a.ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 2904.79', A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 04°33'17”, AN ARC LENGTH OF 230.92', AND A CHORD WHICH BEARS S 71° 19' 34" W, A DISTANCE OF 230.86' TO A TEXAS
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONCRETE MARKER FOUND FOR THE POINT OF TANGENCY;
b. S 69° 07' 36" W, 366.84' TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING 77.902 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.
POINT OF BEGINNING
F.
M
.
2
2
4
3
CALLED 416.78 ACRES
VOLUME 740, PAGE 530
DEED RECORDS
WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS
CALLED 195.193 ACRES
DOC. NO. 2007014280
OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS
WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS
CALLED 195.193 ACRES
DOC. NO. 2007014280
OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS
WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS
CALLED 78.399 ACRES
DOC. NO. 2007014290
OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS
WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS
CALLED 203.137 ACRES
DOC. NO. 2007014282
OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS
WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS
CALLED 190.40 ACRES
VOLUME 743, PAGE 47
DEED RECORDS
WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS
R=2904.79'
L=230.92'
∆=4°33'17"
CB=S71° 19' 34"W
CH=230.86'
S69° 07' 36"W
366.84'
N20° 54' 49"W 3790.27'
S6
8
°
0
8
'
4
7
"
W
1
0
3
1
.
6
4
'
S6
8
°
0
8
'
5
1
"
W
6
1
7
.
5
5
'
S67° 58' 05"W
242.04'R=1380.00'L=837.50'
∆=34°46'19"
CB=N03°18'39"E
CH=824.71'
N8
0
°
4
1
'
1
6
"
E
7
1
4
.
4
5
'
N7
5
°
4
3
'
5
7
"
E
4
3
3
.
3
6
'
N71° 41' 22"E
180.17'
N84° 13' 39"E
214.23'
S68° 45' 41"E
137.76'
S36° 38'
2
0
"
E
3
8
1
.
6
2
'
N68° 17' 44"E
153.39'
S77° 06' 17"E
149.29'
308.8
9
'
S50°
5
8
'
1
3
"
E
S76° 00' 12"E
18.17'
S20° 17' 31"E 470.42'S20° 55' 59"E 791.45'S20° 40' 02"E 707.04'S20° 27' 34"E 1474.58'
FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD
FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD WITH A YELLOW "BURY & PARTNERS" PLASTIC CAP
FOUND 3/8" IRON ROD
FOUND COTTON SPINDLE
FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD WITH A RED "FOREST 1847" PLASTIC CAP
FOUND 2" PIPE
FOUND PK NAIL
FOUND TYPE 1 CONCRETE MARKER
FOUND 60-D NAIL
LEGEND
NOTES:
1) FIELD WORK PERFORMED ON: APRIL 19, 2016
2) BORROWER: EDWIN H. VALE JR.
3) ADDRESS: 3300 FM 2243, GEORGETOWN, TEXAS 78628.
4) BASIS OF BEARING: WAS ESTABLISHED USING THE TRIMBLE VRS NETWORK, NAD83, TEXAS STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, CENTRAL ZONE, 4203, US SURVEY FOOT, GRID.
5) THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON A TITLE COMMITMENT ISSUED BY OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, G.F. NUMBER 31311, ISSUED DATE OF FEBRUARY 08, 2016
EFFECTIVE DATE OF JANUARY 26, 2016 AND IS SUBJECT TO ALL TERMS, CONDITIONS, LEASES AND ENCUMBRANCES STIPULATED THEREIN. THERE MAY BE OTHER EASEMENTS,
RESTRICTIONS, OR ENCUMBRANCES NOT SHOWN.THE SURVEYOR DID NOT COMPLETE AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE.
P.O.B.POINT OF BEGINNING
SET 1/2" IRON ROD WITH A RED "MATKIN-HOOVER
ENG. & SURVEY." PLASTIC CAP
SHEET 2
SHEET 3
SHEET 5
SHEET 6
HERITAGE TREE TABLE
POINT NUMBER SPECIES TRUNK DIA (IN)SPREAD (FT)
5272 ELM 29 45
5273 LIVE OAK 26 45
5276 LIVE OAK 27 50
5289 LIVE OAK MULTI-TRUNK (2)26 40
5322 LIVE OAK 27 45
5573 LIVE OAK 28 35
5579 LIVE OAK 35 40
5580 LIVE OAK MULTI-TRUNK (3)27 45
5581 LIVE OAK MULTI-TRUNK (3)26 40
5588 LIVE OAK 26 50
5589 LIVE OAK MULTI-TRUNK (2)26 45
5272
5273
5276
5289
5322
5573
5579
5580 5581
5588
5589
J. THOMPSON
SURVEY
ABSTRACT NO. 608
J. THOMPSON
SURVEY
ABSTRACT NO. 608
SHEET 4
PHASE 2
PHASE 1
GEORGETOWN CITY LIMTS
GEORGETOWN CITY LIMTS
GEORGETOWN ETJ
GEORGETOWN ETJ
LINE TABLE
LINE
L1
L2
L3
L4
L5
BEARING
N39° 21' 16"W
S39° 21' 16"E
S22° 22' 18"E
S12° 35' 31"E
N69° 07' 36"E
DISTANCE
44.45'
55.26'
8.34'
7.71'
41.88'
CURVE TABLE
CURVE
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
C6
C7
C8
C9
C10
C11
C12
C13
C14
C15
C16
C17
C18
C19
C20
C21
C22
C23
C24
C25
C26
C27
C28
C29
C30
C31
C32
C33
C34
C35
C36
C37
C38
C39
C40
C41
C42
C43
C44
C46
C47
C48
C49
C50
C51
RADIUS
25.00'
25.00'
25.00'
60.00'
25.00'
375.00'
419.00'
375.00'
25.00'
75.00'
15.00'
15.00'
425.00'
575.00'
25.00'
25.00'
675.00'
325.00'
275.00'
325.00'
25.00'
60.00'
25.00'
275.00'
325.00'
275.00'
725.00'
625.00'
25.00'
25.00'
60.00'
25.00'
25.00'
375.00'
25.00'
25.00'
60.00'
25.00'
375.00'
419.00'
375.00'
25.00'
75.00'
25.00'
721.50'
721.50'
1078.50'
878.50'
878.50'
3905.79'
LENGTH
39.93'
39.37'
23.55'
207.28'
23.55'
90.73'
240.00'
57.22'
36.77'
96.84'
23.56'
23.56'
189.20'
441.05'
31.22'
51.06'
752.18'
41.87'
119.32'
228.83'
21.08'
300.98'
26.73'
183.23'
141.01'
35.43'
916.53'
430.92'
37.33'
23.55'
301.53'
23.55'
39.27'
166.94'
32.28'
23.55'
201.28'
23.55'
76.89'
71.52'
53.96'
39.27'
118.12'
37.75'
178.10'
467.87'
231.13'
488.60'
225.81'
236.14'
DELTA
91°31'11"
90°14'20"
53°58'05"
197°56'10"
53°58'05"
13°51'48"
32°49'06"
8°44'33"
84°16'25"
73°59'00"
90°00'00"
90°00'00"
25°30'26"
43°56'53"
71°33'33"
117°01'34"
63°50'49"
7°22'55"
24°51'34"
40°20'32"
48°19'01"
287°24'55"
61°15'56"
38°10'30"
24°51'34"
7°22'55"
72°25'55"
39°30'12"
85°33'19"
53°58'05"
287°56'10"
53°58'05"
90°00'00"
25°30'26"
73°59'00"
53°58'05"
192°12'36"
53°58'05"
11°44'54"
9°46'47"
8°14'38"
90°00'00"
90°14'20"
86°31'22"
14°08'35"
37°09'15"
12°16'44"
31°52'00"
14°43'39"
3°27'51"
CHORD BEARING
N25° 09' 46"E
N65° 42' 59"W
S42° 10' 48"W
N65° 50' 09"W
N06° 08' 54"E
N27° 46' 03"W
N18° 17' 24"W
N06° 15' 08"W
N52° 45' 37"W
N57° 54' 19"W
N65° 54' 49"W
N24° 05' 11"E
N08° 09' 36"W
N17° 22' 50"W
N75° 08' 03"W
N10° 34' 24"E
N79° 51' 47"W
S71° 54' 16"W
S63° 09' 57"W
S70° 54' 25"W
S66° 55' 11"W
N06° 28' 08"E
S60° 27' 22"E
N69° 49' 25"E
N63° 09' 57"E
N71° 54' 16"E
S75° 34' 14"E
S19° 36' 10"E
S42° 37' 44"E
N67° 36' 34"E
S04° 35' 36"W
N58° 25' 21"W
S49° 35' 36"W
S08° 09' 36"E
S57° 54' 19"E
N58° 07' 08"E
S52° 45' 37"E
S16° 21' 38"W
S16° 29' 51"E
S17° 28' 55"E
S16° 42' 50"E
S65° 50' 09"E
S65° 42' 59"E
S63° 51' 30"E
N28° 42' 49"W
N58° 20' 06"W
S70° 46' 22"E
N55° 36' 11"W
N29° 02' 38"W
S70° 47' 29"W
CHORD LENGTH
35.82'
35.43'
22.69'
118.53'
22.69'
90.51'
236.73'
57.16'
33.55'
90.25'
21.21'
21.21'
187.64'
430.31'
29.23'
42.64'
713.86'
41.84'
118.38'
224.14'
20.46'
71.03'
25.48'
179.86'
139.91'
35.41'
856.70'
422.43'
33.96'
22.69'
70.59'
22.69'
35.36'
165.57'
30.08'
22.69'
119.32'
22.69'
76.76'
71.43'
53.91'
35.36'
106.29'
34.27'
177.64'
459.71'
230.69'
482.33'
225.19'
236.10'
CURVE TABLE
CURVE RADIUS LENGTH DELTA CHORD BEARING CHORD LENGTH
CURVE TABLE
CURVE RADIUS LENGTH DELTA CHORD BEARING CHORD LENGTH
CURVE TABLE
CURVE RADIUS LENGTH DELTA CHORD BEARING CHORD LENGTH
CURVE TABLE
CURVE RADIUS LENGTH DELTA CHORD BEARING CHORD LENGTH
L11
L12
S69° 05' 11"W
S69° 05' 11"W
75.77'
75.77'C68
C69
225.00'
175.00'
84.24'
65.52'
21°27'10"
21°27'10"
N58° 21' 36"E
N58° 21' 36"E
83.75'
65.14'
DATE: JULY 2017
CITY PROJECT NO. -
PP-2016-011
TREE
ROAD AND
SEWER LINE
EASEMENT ITEM
10. k.
ROAD AND
SEWER LINE
EASEMENT ITEM
10. k.
1
5
7
.
0
0
'
Page 28 of 87
940
93
0
940
930
940
93
0
910
92
0
920
93
0
S20° 40' 02"E 707.04'
S6
9
°
0
7
'
3
6
"
W
3
6
6
.
8
4
'
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
R=2904.79'
L=230.92'
∆=4°33'17"
CB=S71° 19' 34"W
CH=230.86'
N20° 35' 49"W 355.91'
S20° 35' 49"E 360.28'
N6
9
°
0
9
'
5
1
"
E
1
1
5
.
4
2
'
S20° 50' 09"E 834.92'
N20° 50' 09"W 710.94'
C1
C2
C
3
C4
C5
C4
2
C43
C44
96
.
6
8
'
S6
9
°
0
9
'
5
1
"
W
L=36.66'
L=99.24'
L=91.
6
6
'
L=3.35'
12
5
.
1
1
'
12
3
.
3
5
'
11
8
.
3
8
'
N20° 54' 49"W 3790.27'
284.18'231.46'160.03'162.03'163.30'
93
.
9
0
'
2.78'
L
=
7
2
.
8
9
'
L=33.18'
L
=
1
7
.
7
9
'
L=83.41'22.49'
160.03'162.03'158.12'
178.03'180.00'163.40'
171.54'124.43'55.57'188.62'462.85'
N20° 54' 49"W 2034.95'
C5
1 N6
9
°
1
9
'
5
8
"
E
1
3
4
.
8
1
'
N6
9
°
1
2
'
0
7
"
E
2
7
5
.
7
8
'
N6
9
°
1
2
'
0
7
"
E
2
7
6
.
7
6
'
S20° 50' 09"E 404.53'
N09° 05' 5
7
"
W
1
7
0
.
6
9
'
N19° 08' 36"W 204.81'
S20° 53' 57"E 258.62'
S
2
5
°
2
7
'
5
1
"
W
1
8
8
.
7
6
'
S
4
3
°
0
8
'
4
1
"
W
2
7
2
.
6
2
'
S6
8
°
0
2
'
4
3
"
W
2
7
4
.
4
2
'
S6
8
°
0
2
'
4
3
"
W
2
7
4
.
6
4
'
S6
8
°
0
2
'
4
3
"
W
2
7
4
.
8
6
'
N6
9
°
0
7
'
3
6
"
E
2
7
5
.
0
3
'
L5
10192573.33
3110098.69 10191911.79
3110348.23
10191707.17
3109786.76
5289
60.00'
R=5.00'
L=7.85'
∆=90°00'00"
CB=S65° 35' 49"E
CH=7.07'
R=5.00'
L=7.85'
∆=90°00'00"
CB=N24° 24' 11"E
CH=7.07'
R=5.00'
L=7.85'
∆=90°00'00"
CB=S24° 24' 11"W
CH=7.07'
R=5.00'
L=7.85'
∆=90°00'00"
CB=N65° 35' 49"W
CH=7.07'
R=2904.79'
L=36.66'
∆=0°43'23"
CB=S73° 14' 31"W
CH=36.66'
BLOCK E
SEE DETAIL
THIS SHEET
F.
M
.
2
2
4
3
FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD
FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD WITH A YELLOW "BURY & PARTNERS" PLASTIC CAP
FOUND 3/8" IRON ROD
FOUND COTTON SPINDLE
FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD WITH A RED "FOREST 1847" PLASTIC CAP
FOUND 2" PIPE
FOUND PK NAIL
FOUND TYPE 1 CONCRETE MARKER
FOUND 60-D NAIL
LEGEND
NOTES:
1) FIELD WORK PERFORMED ON: APRIL 19, 2016
2) BORROWER: EDWIN H. VALE JR.
3) ADDRESS: 3300 FM 2243, GEORGETOWN, TEXAS 78628.
4) BASIS OF BEARING: WAS ESTABLISHED USING THE TRIMBLE VRS NETWORK, NAD83, TEXAS STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, CENTRAL ZONE, 4203, US SURVEY FOOT, GRID.
5) THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON A TITLE COMMITMENT ISSUED BY OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, G.F. NUMBER 31311, ISSUED DATE OF FEBRUARY 08, 2016
EFFECTIVE DATE OF JANUARY 26, 2016 AND IS SUBJECT TO ALL TERMS, CONDITIONS, LEASES AND ENCUMBRANCES STIPULATED THEREIN. THERE MAY BE OTHER EASEMENTS,
RESTRICTIONS, OR ENCUMBRANCES NOT SHOWN.THE SURVEYOR DID NOT COMPLETE AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE.
6) SEE SHEET 1 OF 7 FOR LINE AND CURVE TABLES.
SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS:
10. THE FOLLOWING MATTERS AND ALL TERMS OF THE DOCUMENTS CREATING OR OFFERING EVIDENCE OF THE MATTERS:
e.EASEMENT AS SHOWN IN INSTRUMENT FROM CHARLES GRADY BARTON TO CITY OF GEORGETOWN, DATED MAY 12, 1999RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 199961627 OF THE
OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS.
(SHOWN HEREON)
f.EASEMENT AS SHOWN IN INSTRUMENT FROM CHARLES GRADY BARTON TO CITY OF GEORGETOWN, DATED MAY 12, 1999 RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 199961628 OF THE
OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS.
(SHOWN HEREON)
g.EASEMENT AS SHOWN IN INSTRUMENT FROM CARRIE ANN BARTON-SMITH TO CITY OF GEORGETOWN, DATED SEPTEMBER 8, 1999 RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 199961629 OF
THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS.
(SHOWN HEREON)
h.EASEMENT AS SHOWN IN INSTRUMENT FROM CARRIE ANN BARTON-SMITH TO CITY OF GEORGETOWN, DATED SEPTEMBER 8, 1999 RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 199961630 OF
THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS.
(SHOWN HEREON)
i.EASEMENT AS SHOWN IN INSTRUMENT FROM CHARLES GRADY BARTON AND CARRIE ANN BARTON-SMITH TO BRUSHY CREEK MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT, DATED APRIL 15,
2004 RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2004029224 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS.
( SHOWN HEREON)
j.EASEMENT AS SHOWN IN INSTRUMENT FROM CHARLES GRADY BARTON AND CARRIE ANN BARTON-SMITH TO BRUSHY CREEK MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT, DATED APRIL 15,
2004 RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2004029225 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS.
(SHOWN HEREON)
k.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS CONTAINED IN ROAD AND SEWER LINE AGREEMENT EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN CHARLES GRADY BARTON AND CARRIE ANN
BARTON-SMITH, AND LAREDO WO, LTD., DATED FEBRUARY 22, 2007, RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2007014284 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS.
(SHOWN HEREON)
l.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS CONTAINED IN MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT TO SELL AND PURCHASE EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN CHARLES GRADY BARTON AND
CARRIE ANN BARTON-SMITH, AND LAREDO WO, LTD., DATED FEBRUARY 22, 2007, RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2007014283 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON
COUNTY, TEXAS.
P.O.B.POINT OF BEGINNING
OWNER/DEVELOPER:AGENT/PREPARER:
ENGINEERING
& SURVEYING
CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS LAND PLANNERS CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS CONSULTANTS
P.O. BOX 54
8 SPENCER ROAD SUITE 100
BOERNE, TEXAS 78006
OFFICE: 830.249.0600 FAX:830.249.0099
TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-004512
TEXAS REGISTERED SURVEYING FIRM F-10024000
SCALE: 1"=100'
0 50'100'150'200'
GEORGETOWN CITY LIMTS
CALLED 195.193 ACRES
DOC. NO. 2007014280
OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS
WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS
CALLED 416.78 ACRES
VOLUME 740, PAGE 530
DEED RECORDS
WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXASVARIABLE WIDTH
WATER LINE EASEMENT
AND TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
ITEMS 10 i. & j.
SET 1/2" IRON ROD WITH A RED "MATKIN-HOOVER
ENG. & SURVEY." PLASTIC CAP
GREEN SPACE
SHELF ROCK ROAD
VARIABLE WIDTH ROW
SHELF ROCK ROAD
VARIABLE WIDTH ROW
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
S
H
E
E
T
3
BLOCK A
50' TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT
ITEMS 10. e . & g.
15' PUBLIC
UTILITY
EASEMENT
ITEMS 10. f. & h.
VARIABLE WIDTH
WATER LINE EASEMENT
AND TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
ITEMS 10 i. & j.
MATKIN HOOVER
ENGINEERING & SURVEYING
AARON NEUMANN, P.E.
8 SPENCER ROAD SUITE 100
BOERNE, TEXAS 78006
OFF: (830) 249-0600
FAX: (830) 249-0099
GKELLER@MATKINHOOVER.COM
SCALE: 1"=20'
0 10'20'30'40'
SHELF ROCK ROAD
VARIABLE WIDTH ROW
F.
M
.
2
2
4
3
10' P.U.E
10' P.U.E
10' P.U.E
10' P.U.E
10
'
P
.
U
.
E
10' P.U.E
35
.
0
0
'
26.32'
40.91'
54.94'
87.78'
EDGE OF
PAVEMENT
VARIABLE WIDTH EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT
P.O.B.
EDWIN H. VALE JR.
2301 FEDERAL ST.
KILLEEN, TX 26543
J. THOMPSON
SURVEY
ABSTRACT NO. 608
J. THOMPSON
SURVEY
ABSTRACT NO. 608
LOT 1
1.19 AC.LOT 2
1.14 AC.
LOT 3
1.12 AC.
LOT 7
1.01 AC.
LOT 8
1.02 AC.
LOT 9
1.01 AC.LOT 10
1.01 AC.
LOT 11
1.01 AC.
LOT 12
1.01 AC.
LOT 13
1.01 AC.
LOT 14
1.09 AC.
LOT 1000
178.54 SQ. FT.
LOT 1001
0.66 AC.
LOT 1001
0.66 AC.
BLOCK E
BLOCK E
50
.
0
0
'
50
.
0
0
'
S20° 35' 49"E
10.00'
N20° 35' 49"W
10.00'
FUTURE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE
EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES
DATE: JULY 2017
TREE
S82° 52' 19"E
49.12'
25' GATEWAY LANDSCAPE BUFFER
25' GATEWAY LANDSCAPE BUFFER
DECORATIVE WALL
DECORATIVE WALL
CITY PROJECT NO. -
PP-2016-011
Page 29 of 87
90
0
910
9
1
0
9
1
0
920
930
920
910
920
9
2
0
910
9
1
0
91
0
9
1
0
930
N20° 54' 49"W 3790.27'
S20° 27' 34"E 1474.58'
N20° 54' 49"W 3790.27'N20° 54' 49"W 3790.27'N20° 54' 49"W 3790.27'
S20° 27' 34"E
1474.58'
S20° 27' 34"E 1474.58'
N20° 50' 09"W 710.94'
S20° 50' 09"E 834.92'
S10° 37' 24
"
E
3
6
7
.
2
3
'
N10° 37' 24
"
W
2
7
4
.
2
7
'
S8
5
°
0
6
'
1
0
"
W
2
8
5
.
1
6
'
N8
5
°
0
6
'
1
0
"
E
2
6
1
.
6
6
'
N20° 54' 49"W 276.45'
C6
C7
C8
C9
C10
S20° 54' 49"E 509.58'C35
C
3
6
C37
C3
8
C39 C40 C41
182.50'173.22'233.66'164.95'449.13'
13
5
.
7
9
'
19
0
.
7
9
'
14
5
.
6
1
'
13
9
.
5
5
'
14
1
.
1
5
'
10
0
.
5
2
'
182.50'
25.78'
10.05'
264.22'
19.99'159.41'154.08'
137.39'
191.00'
38.85'
L
=
9
1
.
0
4'
L=91.04'
L =110.24'
L=31.65'L=45.24'L=50.00'L=3.95'
L =7 4 .5 9 'L=142.68'L=22.72'
17.14'338.42'193.85'171.52'139.03'158.01'160.64'
S69° 05' 11"W
15.00'
L=27.64'
L=69.20'
N24° 05' 11"E 13.75'
N20° 54' 49"W 2034.95'
241.45'
C5
1
L3 L4
68.34'
N01°
5
2
'
5
1
"
W
N6
9
°
0
7
'
3
6
"
E
2
7
5
.
0
3
'
L5
S6
9
°
0
7
'
3
6
"
W
2
7
5
.
2
8
'
N8
5
°
0
0
'
4
3
"
E
2
7
9
.
2
4
'
N8
5
°
0
6
'
1
0
"
E
3
2
6
.
5
7
'
N04° 5
3
'
5
0
"
W
2
8
5
.
4
1
'
N04° 5
3
'
5
0
"
W
3
0
5
.
0
6
'
N05° 4
9
'
2
1
"
W
3
3
0
.
1
6
'
N01°
2
6
'
4
0
"
W
2
7
8
.
8
9
'
N
2
8
°
0
4
'
1
2
"
E
2
2
9
.
3
7
'
N7
9
°
2
2
'
3
6
"
E
2
1
3
.
7
2
'
N7
9
°
2
2
'
3
6
"
E
2
4
6
.
8
3
'
N7
9
°
2
2
'
3
6
"
E
2
7
4
.
8
0
'
N7
0
°
1
6
'
5
9
"
E
2
8
0
.
0
1
'
N7
0
°
1
6
'
5
9
"
E
2
7
9
.
0
0
'
N28° 04' 12"E
229.37'
5276
S
6
5
°
3
0
'
0
3
"
W
2
5
3
.
7
6
'
5589
10193954.89
3109583.26
3
3
.
3
2
'
S
4
5
°
0
9
'
0
7
"
W
R=406.00'
L=46.55'
∆=6°34'11"
CB=S19° 05' 13"E
CH=46.53'
S22° 22' 18"E 37.19'
R=394.00'
L=67.25'
∆=9°46'47"
CB=S17° 28' 55"E
CH=67.17'
S12° 35' 31"E
4
9
.
1
2
'
R=406.00'
L=16.59'
∆=2°20'30"
CB=S13° 45' 46"E
CH=16.59'
R=5.00'
L=14.10'
∆=161°32'19"
CB=S65° 50' 09"W
CH=9.87'
R=394.00'
L=216.71'
∆=31°30'50"
CB=N17° 38' 16"W
CH=213.99'
N01° 52' 51"W
5.07'
R=5.00'
L=14.49'
∆=166°04'44"
CB=N81° 09' 31"E
CH=9.93'
N50°
3
1
'
0
1
"
W
6
7
.
8
0
'
SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS:
10. THE FOLLOWING MATTERS AND ALL TERMS OF THE DOCUMENTS CREATING OR OFFERING EVIDENCE OF THE MATTERS:
e.EASEMENT AS SHOWN IN INSTRUMENT FROM CHARLES GRADY BARTON TO CITY OF GEORGETOWN, DATED MAY 12, 1999RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 199961627 OF THE
OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS.
(SHOWN HEREON)
f.EASEMENT AS SHOWN IN INSTRUMENT FROM CHARLES GRADY BARTON TO CITY OF GEORGETOWN, DATED MAY 12, 1999 RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 199961628 OF THE
OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS.
(SHOWN HEREON)
g.EASEMENT AS SHOWN IN INSTRUMENT FROM CARRIE ANN BARTON-SMITH TO CITY OF GEORGETOWN, DATED SEPTEMBER 8, 1999 RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 199961629 OF
THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS.
(SHOWN HEREON)
h.EASEMENT AS SHOWN IN INSTRUMENT FROM CARRIE ANN BARTON-SMITH TO CITY OF GEORGETOWN, DATED SEPTEMBER 8, 1999 RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 199961630 OF
THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS.
(SHOWN HEREON)
i.EASEMENT AS SHOWN IN INSTRUMENT FROM CHARLES GRADY BARTON AND CARRIE ANN BARTON-SMITH TO BRUSHY CREEK MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT, DATED APRIL 15,
2004 RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2004029224 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS.
( SHOWN HEREON)
j.EASEMENT AS SHOWN IN INSTRUMENT FROM CHARLES GRADY BARTON AND CARRIE ANN BARTON-SMITH TO BRUSHY CREEK MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT, DATED APRIL 15,
2004 RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2004029225 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS.
(SHOWN HEREON)
k.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS CONTAINED IN ROAD AND SEWER LINE AGREEMENT EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN CHARLES GRADY BARTON AND CARRIE ANN
BARTON-SMITH, AND LAREDO WO, LTD., DATED FEBRUARY 22, 2007, RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2007014284 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS.
(SHOWN HEREON)
l.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS CONTAINED IN MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT TO SELL AND PURCHASE EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN CHARLES GRADY BARTON AND
CARRIE ANN BARTON-SMITH, AND LAREDO WO, LTD., DATED FEBRUARY 22, 2007, RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2007014283 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON
COUNTY, TEXAS.
CALLED 195.193 ACRES
DOC. NO. 2007014280
OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS
WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS
CALLED 416.78 ACRES
VOLUME 740, PAGE 530
DEED RECORDS
WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS VARIABLE WIDTH
WATER LINE EASEMENT
AND TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
ITEMS 10 i. & j.
OWNER/DEVELOPER:AGENT/PREPARER:
ENGINEERING
& SURVEYING
CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS LAND PLANNERS CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS CONSULTANTS
P.O. BOX 54
8 SPENCER ROAD SUITE 100
BOERNE, TEXAS 78006
OFFICE: 830.249.0600 FAX:830.249.0099
TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-004512
TEXAS REGISTERED SURVEYING FIRM F-10024000
SCALE: 1"=100'
0 50'100'150'200'
FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD
FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD WITH A YELLOW "BURY & PARTNERS" PLASTIC CAP
FOUND 3/8" IRON ROD
FOUND COTTON SPINDLE
FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD WITH A RED "FOREST 1847" PLASTIC CAP
FOUND 2" PIPE
FOUND PK NAIL
FOUND TYPE 1 CONCRETE MARKER
FOUND 60-D NAIL
LEGEND
P.O.B.POINT OF BEGINNING
SET 1/2" IRON ROD WITH A RED "MATKIN-HOOVER
ENG. & SURVEY." PLASTIC CAP
SHELF ROCK ROAD
VARIABLE WIDTH ROW
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
S
H
E
E
T
2
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
S
H
E
E
T
4
MATKIN HOOVER
ENGINEERING & SURVEYING
AARON NEUMANN, P.E.
8 SPENCER ROAD SUITE 100
BOERNE, TEXAS 78006
OFF: (830) 249-0600
FAX: (830) 249-0099
GKELLER@MATKINHOOVER.COM
SCALE: 1"=30'
0 15'30'45'60'
GEORGETOWN CITY LIMTS
GEORGETOWN CITY LIMTS
LOT 1002
178.54 SQ.FT.
10' P.U.E
10' P.U.E
10' P.U.E
10
'
P
.
U
.
E
10
'
P
.
U
.
E
10' P.U.E
10' P.U.E
10' P.U.E
35
.
0
0
'
NOTES:
1) FIELD WORK PERFORMED ON: APRIL 19, 2016
2) BORROWER: EDWIN H. VALE JR.
3) ADDRESS: 3300 FM 2243, GEORGETOWN, TEXAS 78628.
4) BASIS OF BEARING: WAS ESTABLISHED USING THE TRIMBLE VRS NETWORK, NAD83, TEXAS STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, CENTRAL ZONE, 4203, US SURVEY FOOT, GRID.
5) THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON A TITLE COMMITMENT ISSUED BY OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, G.F. NUMBER 31311, ISSUED DATE OF FEBRUARY 08, 2016
EFFECTIVE DATE OF JANUARY 26, 2016 AND IS SUBJECT TO ALL TERMS, CONDITIONS, LEASES AND ENCUMBRANCES STIPULATED THEREIN. THERE MAY BE OTHER EASEMENTS,
RESTRICTIONS, OR ENCUMBRANCES NOT SHOWN.THE SURVEYOR DID NOT COMPLETE AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE.
6) SEE SHEET 1 OF 7 FOR LINE AND CURVE TABLES.
SEE DETAIL
THIS SHEET
VARIABLE WIDTH EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT
O.S.S.F. SETBACK
SEE SHEET 7 OF 8 FOR
DIMENSION DETAIL
EDWIN H. VALE JR.
2301 FEDERAL ST.
KILLEEN, TX 26543
J. THOMPSON
SURVEY
ABSTRACT NO. 608
J. THOMPSON
SURVEY
ABSTRACT NO. 608
GEORGETOWN ETJ
GEORGETOWN ETJ
SHELF ROCK ROAD
VARIABLE WIDTH ROW
LOT 4
1.01 AC.
LOT 5
1.01 AC.
LOT 6
1.01 AC.
LOT 7
1.01 AC.
LOT 8
1.01 AC.
LOT 9
1.01 AC.
LOT 10
1.11 AC.
LOT 11
1.08 AC.
LOT 12
1.01 AC.
LOT 13
1.01 AC.
LOT 1
1.23 AC.
LOT 2
1.15 AC.
LOT 3
1.11 AC.
LOT 4
1.11 AC.
LOT 5
1.11 AC.
LOT 6
1.15 AC.
LOT 3
1.11 AC.LOT 4
1.11 AC.
LOT 5
1.11 AC.
LOT 5
1.01 AC.
LOT 6
1.01 AC.
LOT 7
1.01 AC.
294.21'
176.45'
BLOCK A
BLOCK A
LOT 1003
0.07 AC.
BLOCK E
BLOCK E
50
.
0
0
'
5589
60.00'
PHASE 1
FUTURE PHASES
DATE: JULY 2017
TREE
50.00'
50
.
0
0
'
CITY PROJECT NO. -
PP-2016-011
Page 30 of 87
8
6
0
8
7
0
87
0
880
8
9
0
90
0
87
0
8
8
0
8
9
0
900
910
8
7
0
9
0
0
9
1
0
8
6
0
860
8
7
0
88
0
9
1
0
9
1
0
S20° 17' 31"E 470.42'S20° 55' 59"E 791.45'S20° 55' 59"E 791.45'
S20° 27' 34"E
1474.58'
N20° 54' 49"W 276.45'N20° 54' 49"W 143.13'
N04
°
3
5
'
3
6
"
E
2
8
3
.
5
3
'
S8
5
°
2
4
'
2
4
"
E
1
2
3
.
4
1
'
S47° 38' 01"W
1.78'
S20° 54' 49"E 509.58'
S04
°
3
5
'
3
6
"
W
2
3
3
.
9
0
'
N8
5
°
2
4
'
2
4
"
W
1
2
1
.
4
6
'
C11C12
C13
C14
C28
C29
C3
0
C31
C32
C
3
3
C34
294.21'17.14'
60.00'
S69° 05' 11"W
15.00'
497.24'
28.24'
149.19'247.19'45.80'
32
.
8
5
'
88
.
6
1
'
95
.
5
0
'
95
.
5
0
'
11
2
.
0
7
'
S6
9
°
0
4
'
0
1
"
W
78
.
9
3
'
S6
9
°
0
4
'
0
1
"
W
12.50'
11
5
.
0
1
'
23.23'
19
8
.
8
9
'
N7
5
°
4
6
'
1
7
"
E
1
2
7
.
5
1
'
N6
9
°
0
5
'
1
1
"
E
2
2
2
.
1
1
'
241.45'268.13'
L=104.22 '
L=10
0.
2
0
'
L =97.11'
L=79.74'
L=126.92'L =2 2 4 .2 5 '
7.69'
N04° 5
3
'
5
0
"
W
3
0
5
.
0
6
'
N05° 4
9
'
2
1
"
W
3
3
0
.
1
6
'
N01°
2
6
'
4
0
"
W
2
7
8
.
8
9
'
N
2
8
°
0
4
'
1
2
"
E
2
2
9
.
3
7
'
N17° 47' 13"W 181.98'
N17° 47' 13"W 135.56'
S30° 16' 31"E
4
1
9
.
8
3
'
140.85'
278.98'
N8
5
°
2
4
'
2
4
"
W
2
9
8
.
6
5
'
N04
°
3
5
'
3
6
"
E
2
5
0
.
6
7
'
N
5
5
°
2
5
'
5
9
"
E
1
4
1
.
5
1
'
N7
0
°
5
2
'
2
0
"
E
3
4
7
.
4
3
'
S
5
0
°
3
8
'
4
4
"
W
3
5
0
.
4
5
'
S69° 05' 11"W
56.42'
N28° 04' 12"E
229.37'
5581
5322
55795580
5588
5573
10193954.89
3109583.26
10194694.11
3109300.49
10195135.33
3109137.35
341.15'
721.89'
RO
C
K
R
I
V
E
R
R
O
A
D
50
'
W
I
D
E
R
I
G
H
T
-
O
F
-
W
A
Y
OWNER/DEVELOPER:AGENT/PREPARER:
ENGINEERING
& SURVEYING
CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS LAND PLANNERS CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS CONSULTANTS
P.O. BOX 54
8 SPENCER ROAD SUITE 100
BOERNE, TEXAS 78006
OFFICE: 830.249.0600 FAX:830.249.0099
TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-004512
TEXAS REGISTERED SURVEYING FIRM F-10024000
SCALE: 1"=100'
0 50'100'150'200'
SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS:
10. THE FOLLOWING MATTERS AND ALL TERMS OF THE DOCUMENTS CREATING OR OFFERING EVIDENCE OF THE MATTERS:
e.EASEMENT AS SHOWN IN INSTRUMENT FROM CHARLES GRADY BARTON TO CITY OF GEORGETOWN, DATED MAY 12, 1999RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO.
199961627 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS.
(SHOWN HEREON)
f.EASEMENT AS SHOWN IN INSTRUMENT FROM CHARLES GRADY BARTON TO CITY OF GEORGETOWN, DATED MAY 12, 1999 RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO.
199961628 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS.
(SHOWN HEREON)
g.EASEMENT AS SHOWN IN INSTRUMENT FROM CARRIE ANN BARTON-SMITH TO CITY OF GEORGETOWN, DATED SEPTEMBER 8, 1999 RECORDED IN
DOCUMENT NO. 199961629 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS.
(SHOWN HEREON)
h.EASEMENT AS SHOWN IN INSTRUMENT FROM CARRIE ANN BARTON-SMITH TO CITY OF GEORGETOWN, DATED SEPTEMBER 8, 1999 RECORDED IN
DOCUMENT NO. 199961630 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS.
(SHOWN HEREON)
i.EASEMENT AS SHOWN IN INSTRUMENT FROM CHARLES GRADY BARTON AND CARRIE ANN BARTON-SMITH TO BRUSHY CREEK MUNICIPAL UTILITY
DISTRICT, DATED APRIL 15, 2004 RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2004029224 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS.
( SHOWN HEREON)
j.EASEMENT AS SHOWN IN INSTRUMENT FROM CHARLES GRADY BARTON AND CARRIE ANN BARTON-SMITH TO BRUSHY CREEK MUNICIPAL UTILITY
DISTRICT, DATED APRIL 15, 2004 RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2004029225 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS.
(SHOWN HEREON)
k.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS CONTAINED IN ROAD AND SEWER LINE AGREEMENT EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN CHARLES GRADY BARTON
AND CARRIE ANN BARTON-SMITH, AND LAREDO WO, LTD., DATED FEBRUARY 22, 2007, RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2007014284 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC
RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS.
(SHOWN HEREON)
l.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS CONTAINED IN MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT TO SELL AND PURCHASE EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN CHARLES
GRADY BARTON AND CARRIE ANN BARTON-SMITH, AND LAREDO WO, LTD., DATED FEBRUARY 22, 2007, RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2007014283 OF THE
OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS.
CALLED 195.193 ACRES
DOC. NO. 2007014280
OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS
WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS
CALLED 416.78 ACRES
VOLUME 740, PAGE 530
DEED RECORDS
WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS
VARIABLE WIDTH
WATER LINE EASEMENT
AND TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
ITEMS 10 i. & j.
FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD
FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD WITH A YELLOW "BURY & PARTNERS" PLASTIC CAP
FOUND 3/8" IRON ROD
FOUND COTTON SPINDLE
FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD WITH A RED "FOREST 1847" PLASTIC CAP
FOUND 2" PIPE
FOUND PK NAIL
FOUND TYPE 1 CONCRETE MARKER
FOUND 60-D NAIL
LEGEND
P.O.B.POINT OF BEGINNING
SET 1/2" IRON ROD WITH A RED "MATKIN-HOOVER
ENG. & SURVEY." PLASTIC CAP
SHELF ROCK ROAD
VARIABLE WIDTH ROW
PH
A
S
E
1
FU
T
U
R
E
P
H
A
S
E
S
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
S
H
E
E
T
3
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
S
H
E
E
T
5
MATKIN HOOVER
ENGINEERING & SURVEYING
AARON NEUMANN, P.E.
8 SPENCER ROAD SUITE 100
BOERNE, TEXAS 78006
OFF: (830) 249-0600
FAX: (830) 249-0099
GKELLER@MATKINHOOVER.COM
10' P.U.E
10' P.U.E
10'
P
.
U
.
E
10' P.U.E
35
.
0
0
'
NOTES:
1) FIELD WORK PERFORMED ON: APRIL 19, 2016
2) BORROWER: EDWIN H. VALE JR.
3) ADDRESS: 3300 FM 2243, GEORGETOWN, TEXAS 78628.
4) BASIS OF BEARING: WAS ESTABLISHED USING THE TRIMBLE VRS NETWORK, NAD83, TEXAS STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, CENTRAL ZONE, 4203, US
SURVEY FOOT, GRID.
5) THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON A TITLE COMMITMENT ISSUED BY OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, G.F. NUMBER 31311, ISSUED DATE OF
FEBRUARY 08, 2016 EFFECTIVE DATE OF JANUARY 26, 2016 AND IS SUBJECT TO ALL TERMS, CONDITIONS, LEASES AND ENCUMBRANCES STIPULATED THEREIN.
THERE MAY BE OTHER EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS, OR ENCUMBRANCES NOT SHOWN.THE SURVEYOR DID NOT COMPLETE AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE.
6) SEE SHEET 1 OF 7 FOR LINE AND CURVE TABLES.
VARIABLE WIDTH EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT
APPROXIMATE
EDGE OF WATER
CALCULATED
POINT
50' ON SITE SEWAGE
FACILITY SETBACK
SEE SHEET 7 OF 8 FOR
DIMENSION DETAIL
O.S.S.F. SETBACK
SEE SHEET 7 OF 8 FOR
DIMENSION DETAIL
O.S.S.F. SETBACK
SEE SHEET 7 OF 8 FOR
DIMENSION DETAIL
EDWIN H. VALE JR.
2301 FEDERAL ST.
KILLEEN, TX 26543
J. THOMPSON
SURVEY
ABSTRACT NO. 608
J. THOMPSON
SURVEY
ABSTRACT NO. 608
O.S.S.F. SETBACK
SEE SHEET 6 OF 8 FOR
DIMENSION DETAIL
SENSITIVE FEATURE
BUFFER ZONE
SEE SHEET 6 OF 8 FOR
DIMENSION DETAIL
LOT 14
1.16 AC.
LOT 15
1.70 AC.
LOT 16
1.27 AC.LOT 17
1.44 AC.
LOT 1
3.12 AC.
LOT 1005
3.87 AC.
LOT 10
1.11 AC.
LOT 11
1.08 AC.
LOT 12
1.01 AC.
LOT 13
1.01 AC.
LOT 18
1.64 AC.
449.13'
LOT 1004
0.17 AC.
LOT 1003
0.10 AC.FUTURE
STREET
CONNECTION
BLOCK A
BLOCK A
BLOCK D
BLOCK EBLOCK D
50
.
0
0
'
CITY OF GEORGETOWN
WATER QUALITY BUFFER ZONE
SEE SHEET 7 OF 8
FOR DIMENSION DETAIL
10195139.72
3109119.71
60.00'
LOT 1
1.23 AC.
DATE: JULY 2017
TREE
50.0
0
'
191.45'10' P.U.E
CITY PROJECT NO. -
PP-2016-011
Page 31 of 87
900
9
0
0
890
8
6
0
8
7
0
87
0
91
0
900
88
0
8
9
0
900
87
0
S6
8
°
0
8
'
4
7
"
W
1
0
3
1
.
6
4
'
N7
1
°
4
1
'
2
2
"
E
1
8
0
.
1
7
'
N8
4
°
1
3
'
3
9
"
E
2
1
4
.
2
3
'
S68
°
4
5
'
4
1
"
E
1
3
7
.
7
6
'
S36° 38'
2
0
"
E
3
8
1
.
6
2
'
N68° 17' 44"E
153.39'
S77
°
0
6
'
1
7
"
E
1
4
9
.
2
9
'
S50°
5
8
'
1
3
"
E
3
0
8
.
8
9
'
S76° 00' 12"E
18.17'
N7
5
°
4
3
'
5
7
"
E
4
3
3
.
3
6
'
S6
8
°
0
8
'
4
7
"
W
1
0
3
1
.
6
4
'
N47° 38' 01"E
1.59'
S47° 38' 01"W
1.78'
S6
8
°
1
2
'
4
8
"
W
1
3
0
.
8
9
'
N6
8
°
1
2
'
4
8
"
E
1
3
0
.
8
9
'
S7
5
°
3
5
'
4
4
"
W
1
6
6
.
7
6
'
N7
5
°
3
5
'
4
4
"
E
1
6
6
.
7
6
'
C1
5
C16
C17
C1
8
C2
6
C27
45.80'
172.8
4
'
136.0
5
'
221.32'
27
8
.
2
6
'
22
0
.
8
7
'
22
6
.
1
9
'
15
7
.
2
0
'
94
.
8
2
'
73
.
8
1
'
10
6
.
3
6
'
93
.
9
9
'
12
0
.
2
4
'
84.6
6
'
53.1
0
'
L =2 2 4 .2 5 '
7.69'
47.57'
L=568.30'
L=141.33'
L=140.45'
L=183.88'
L =2 7 8 .6 7 '
L=25 8.4 5'
L=97.63'
39
.
2
6
'
91
.
6
3
'
71
.
1
8
'
59
.
7
1
'
62
.
1
6
'
93
.
5
7
'
73
.
1
9
'
10
4
.
6
0
'
14
9
.
1
9
'
L1
L2
S
5
0
°
3
8
'
4
4
"
W
3
5
0
.
4
5
'
S
5
0
°
3
8
'
4
4
"
W
2
7
9
.
9
6
'
N68° 18' 15"E
71.26'
N06
°
5
5
'
5
2
"
E
2
7
2
.
5
9
'
N04° 5
9
'
1
6
"
W
2
8
3
.
8
2
'
N17° 09' 34"W 283.15'
N17° 09' 34"W 293.49'
S21° 47' 12"E 228.61'
S21° 47' 12"E 213.63'
S21° 47' 12"E 188.48'
5272
5273
N17° 09' 34"W 272.80'
10195135.33
3109137.3510195139.72
3109119.71
10195334.24
3108879.76
10195367.56
3108734.24
10195310.83
3108591.72
10195617.05
3108363.99
10195666.95
3108235.58
10195645.40
3108022.44
10195588.80
3107851.39
10195247.73
3108433.78
C
6
8
C
6
9
L1
1
L1
2
50.00'
OWNER/DEVELOPER:AGENT/PREPARER:
ENGINEERING
& SURVEYING
CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS LAND PLANNERS CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS CONSULTANTS
P.O. BOX 54
8 SPENCER ROAD SUITE 100
BOERNE, TEXAS 78006
OFFICE: 830.249.0600 FAX:830.249.0099
TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-004512
TEXAS REGISTERED SURVEYING FIRM F-10024000
SCALE: 1"=100'
0 50'100'150'200'
SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS:
10. THE FOLLOWING MATTERS AND ALL TERMS OF THE DOCUMENTS CREATING OR OFFERING EVIDENCE OF THE MATTERS:
e.EASEMENT AS SHOWN IN INSTRUMENT FROM CHARLES GRADY BARTON TO CITY OF GEORGETOWN, DATED MAY 12, 1999RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 199961627 OF THE
OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS.
(SHOWN HEREON)
f.EASEMENT AS SHOWN IN INSTRUMENT FROM CHARLES GRADY BARTON TO CITY OF GEORGETOWN, DATED MAY 12, 1999 RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 199961628 OF THE
OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS.
(SHOWN HEREON)
g.EASEMENT AS SHOWN IN INSTRUMENT FROM CARRIE ANN BARTON-SMITH TO CITY OF GEORGETOWN, DATED SEPTEMBER 8, 1999 RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 199961629 OF
THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS.
(SHOWN HEREON)
h.EASEMENT AS SHOWN IN INSTRUMENT FROM CARRIE ANN BARTON-SMITH TO CITY OF GEORGETOWN, DATED SEPTEMBER 8, 1999 RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 199961630 OF
THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS.
(SHOWN HEREON)
i.EASEMENT AS SHOWN IN INSTRUMENT FROM CHARLES GRADY BARTON AND CARRIE ANN BARTON-SMITH TO BRUSHY CREEK MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT, DATED APRIL 15,
2004 RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2004029224 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS.
( SHOWN HEREON)
j.EASEMENT AS SHOWN IN INSTRUMENT FROM CHARLES GRADY BARTON AND CARRIE ANN BARTON-SMITH TO BRUSHY CREEK MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT, DATED APRIL 15,
2004 RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2004029225 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS.
(SHOWN HEREON)
k.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS CONTAINED IN ROAD AND SEWER LINE AGREEMENT EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN CHARLES GRADY BARTON AND CARRIE ANN
BARTON-SMITH, AND LAREDO WO, LTD., DATED FEBRUARY 22, 2007, RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2007014284 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS.
(SHOWN HEREON)
l.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS CONTAINED IN MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT TO SELL AND PURCHASE EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN CHARLES GRADY BARTON AND
CARRIE ANN BARTON-SMITH, AND LAREDO WO, LTD., DATED FEBRUARY 22, 2007, RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2007014283 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON
COUNTY, TEXAS.
CALLED 195.193 ACRES
DOC. NO. 2007014280
OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS
WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS
CALLED 203.137 ACRES
DOC. NO. 2007014282
OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS
WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS
CALLED 190.40 ACRES
VOLUME 743, PAGE 47
DEED RECORDS
WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS
CALLED 416.78 ACRES
VOLUME 740, PAGE 530
DEED RECORDS
WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS
CALCULATED POINT
VARIABLE WIDTH
WATER LINE EASEMENT
AND TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
ITEMS 10 i. & j.
FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD
FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD WITH A YELLOW "BURY & PARTNERS" PLASTIC CAP
FOUND 3/8" IRON ROD
FOUND COTTON SPINDLE
FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD WITH A RED "FOREST 1847" PLASTIC CAP
FOUND 2" PIPE
FOUND PK NAIL
FOUND TYPE 1 CONCRETE MARKER
FOUND 60-D NAIL
LEGEND
P.O.B.POINT OF BEGINNING
SET 1/2" IRON ROD WITH A RED "MATKIN-HOOVER
ENG. & SURVEY." PLASTIC CAP
SH
E
L
F
R
O
C
K
R
O
A
D
VA
R
I
A
B
L
E
W
I
D
T
H
R
O
W
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
S
H
E
E
T
4
MATCHLINE SHEET 6
MATKIN HOOVER
ENGINEERING & SURVEYING
AARON NEUMANN, P.E.
8 SPENCER ROAD SUITE 100
BOERNE, TEXAS 78006
OFF: (830) 249-0600
FAX: (830) 249-0099
GKELLER@MATKINHOOVER.COM
NOTES:
1) FIELD WORK PERFORMED ON: APRIL 19, 2016
2) BORROWER: EDWIN H. VALE JR.
3) ADDRESS: 3300 FM 2243, GEORGETOWN, TEXAS 78628.
4) BASIS OF BEARING: WAS ESTABLISHED USING THE TRIMBLE VRS NETWORK, NAD83, TEXAS STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, CENTRAL ZONE, 4203, US SURVEY FOOT, GRID.
5) THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON A TITLE COMMITMENT ISSUED BY OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, G.F. NUMBER 31311, ISSUED DATE OF FEBRUARY 08, 2016
EFFECTIVE DATE OF JANUARY 26, 2016 AND IS SUBJECT TO ALL TERMS, CONDITIONS, LEASES AND ENCUMBRANCES STIPULATED THEREIN. THERE MAY BE OTHER EASEMENTS,
RESTRICTIONS, OR ENCUMBRANCES NOT SHOWN.THE SURVEYOR DID NOT COMPLETE AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE.
6) SEE SHEET 1 OF 7 FOR LINE AND CURVE TABLES.
VARIABLE WIDTH EMERGENCY
ACCESS EASEMENT
CITY OF GEORGETOWN
WATER QUALITY EASEMENT
SEE SHEET 7 OF 8
FOR DIMENSION DETAIL
3
5
0
.
2
9
'
S
5
0
°
3
8
'
4
4
"
W
S20° 17' 31"E 470.42'
50' O.S.S.F. SETBACK
SEE SHEET 7 OF 8
FOR DIMENSION DETAIL
EDWIN H. VALE JR.
2301 FEDERAL ST.
KILLEEN, TX 26543
J. THOMPSON
SURVEY
ABSTRACT NO. 608
J. THOMPSON
SURVEY
ABSTRACT NO. 608
LI
V
E
R
O
C
K
R
O
A
D
50
'
W
I
D
E
R
I
G
H
T
-
O
F
-
W
A
Y
10'
P
.
U
.
E
10'
P
.
U
.
E
LOT 18
1.64 AC.
LOT 19
1.57 AC.
LOT 20
1.20 AC.
LOT 21
1.12 AC.
LOT 22
1.10 AC.
LOT 23
1.06 AC.
LOT 24
1.05 AC.
LOT 2
1.13 AC.
LOT 3
1.05 AC.
LOT 4
1.29 AC.
LOT 17
1.44 AC.
LOT 1
3.12 AC.
LOT 25
1.01 AC.
LOT 1
1.01 AC.
C14
C28
721.89'
FUTURE
STREET
CONNECTION
BLOCK A
BLOCK A
BLOCK C
BLOCK C
BLOCK D
SENSITIVE FEATURE
BUFFER ZONE
SEE THIS SHEET FOR
DIMENSION DETAIL
SCALE: 1"=100'
0 50'100'150'200'
LOT 25
1.01 AC.LOT 1
1.01 AC.
LOT 2
1.13 AC.
LOT 24
1.05 AC.
O.S.S.F. SETBACK
SEE SHEET 6 OF 8 FOR
DIMENSION DETAIL
SENSITIVE FEATURE
BUFFER ZONE
SEE SHEET 6 OF 8 FOR
DIMENSION DETAIL
O.S.S.F. SETBACK
SEE THIS SHEET FOR
DIMENSION DETAIL
C66
C6
4
C65
C67
N11° 22' 56"
W
107.24'
N
3
9
°
3
1
'
4
7
"
E
4
8
.
0
8
'
64.96'
S11° 22' 56"
E
S39° 31' 41"W
24.02'
S68° 08' 47"W
46.29'
S68° 08' 47"W
61.57'
S68° 08' 47"W
40.12'
S68° 08' 47"W
99.97'
O.S.S.F. SETBACK
SENSITIVE FEATURE
BUFFER ZONE
CURVE TABLE
CURVE
C64
C65
C66
C67
RADIUS
50.00'
50.00'
150.00'
150.00'
LENGTH
44.43'
157.34'
289.51'
472.79'
DELTA
50°54'44"
180°17'37"
110°35'01"
180°35'27"
CHORD BEARING
N14° 04' 25"E
S50° 19' 24"E
S06° 32' 19"E
N59° 23' 53"W
CHORD LENGTH
42.98'
100.00'
246.62'
300.00'
50.00'
DATE: JULY 2017
TREE
50.00'
50.0
0
'
CITY PROJECT NO. -
PP-2016-011
Page 32 of 87
90
0
8
9
0
90
0
8
3
0
8
4
0
8
5
0
860
870
880
890
9
0
0
91
0
S6
8
°
0
8
'
5
1
"
W
6
1
7
.
5
5
'
S6
7
°
5
8
'
0
5
"
W
2
4
2
.
0
4
'
R=1380.00'L=837.50'
∆=34°46'19"
CB=N03°18'39"E
CH=824.71'
N8
0
°
4
1
'
1
6
"
E
7
1
4
.
4
5
'
N7
5
°
4
3
'
5
7
"
E
4
3
3
.
3
6
'
S7
5
°
3
5
'
4
4
"
W
1
6
6
.
7
6
'
N7
5
°
3
5
'
4
4
"
E
1
6
6
.
7
6
'
S
5
0
°
4
4
'
1
0
"
W
1
7
3
.
4
8
'
N
5
0
°
4
4
'
1
0
"
E
1
7
3
.
4
8
'
C
1
9
C2
0
C2
1
C22
C23
C2
4
C
2
5
17
6
.
0
8
'
13
0
.
2
4
'
26.76'
26
5
.
7
9
'
26
5
.
7
4
'
48
.
8
8
'
59
.
2
6
'
62
.
1
6
'
93
.
5
7
'
73
.
1
9
'
10
4
.
6
0
'
14
9
.
1
9
'
32
.
1
5
'
37
7
.
3
4
'
33
7
.
1
1
'
L=44.56'
L
=
9
6
.
4
5
'
13.63'
1
5
7
.
0
0
'
2.84'
L=38.34'
L=51.99'
L=34.69'
L=55.22'
L=40.67'
L=42.80'
L=30.32'
1.54'
1
5
7
.
2
4
'
14.70'
L=66.24'
L=170.36'
L=161.02'
L=227.59'
L=11.58'L=131.09'
L=37.64'
L=31.98'
C46
C47
C48
C49
C50
L=57.69'
L =4 1 0 .1 7 '
N17° 09' 34"W 293.49'
S21° 47' 12"E 228.61'
N17° 09' 34"W 296.90'
N24° 24' 20"W 276.89'
S24° 14' 44"E 183.81'
S39° 02'
5
8
"
E
1
4
8
.
6
2
'
S58°
3
1
'
0
5
"
E
3
1
2
.
8
5
'
N66
°
1
0
'
5
9
"
W
4
0
6
.
4
2
'
N8
9
°
3
3
'
2
2
"
W
3
0
5
.
1
8
'
91
.
4
8
'
N8
3
°
1
7
'
5
8
"
E
S
5
9
°
5
2
'
2
8
"
W
2
2
0
.
9
0
'
S
3
8
°
3
3
'
0
9
"
W
2
2
4
.
4
3
'
S6
7
°
0
5
'
3
9
"
W
3
2
3
.
8
3
'
S8
2
°
5
5
'
2
0
"
W
2
3
0
.
5
2
'
S20° 30' 20"E 161.00'
N72° 12' 26"E 8.26'
S30° 37' 17"E 141.34'S22° 54' 57"E 101.22'
S02° 58' 07"E 64.31'
S14° 30' 56"W 48.81'
S24° 49' 45"W 42.59'
S45° 34' 32"W 66.22'
S58° 58' 10"E 65.43'
S44° 19' 02"E 121.72'
N20° 30' 20"W 120.60'
S72° 12' 26"W 23.85'
N30° 37' 17"W 54.81'
N22° 54' 57"W 76.90'
N02° 58' 07"W 31.35'
N24° 49' 45"E 15.26'
N
4
5
°
3
4
'
3
2
"
E
1
3
7
.
7
6
'
N00° 47' 19"W 44.90'
N58°
5
8
'
1
0
"
W
1
4
8
.
2
6
'
N44° 1
9
'
0
2
"
W
67.68'
19
3
.
1
6
'
10195482.00
3107431.40
10194633.85
3106903.10
10194543.06
3106678.73
10195366.39
3106726.36
5573
OWNER/DEVELOPER:AGENT/PREPARER:
ENGINEERING
& SURVEYING
CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS LAND PLANNERS CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS CONSULTANTS
P.O. BOX 54
8 SPENCER ROAD SUITE 100
BOERNE, TEXAS 78006
OFFICE: 830.249.0600 FAX:830.249.0099
TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-004512
TEXAS REGISTERED SURVEYING FIRM F-10024000
SCALE: 1"=100'
0 50'100'150'200'
SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS:
10. THE FOLLOWING MATTERS AND ALL TERMS OF THE DOCUMENTS CREATING OR OFFERING
EVIDENCE OF THE MATTERS:
e.EASEMENT AS SHOWN IN INSTRUMENT FROM CHARLES GRADY BARTON TO CITY OF
GEORGETOWN, DATED MAY 12, 1999RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 199961627 OF THE OFFICIAL
PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS.
(SHOWN HEREON)
f.EASEMENT AS SHOWN IN INSTRUMENT FROM CHARLES GRADY BARTON TO CITY OF
GEORGETOWN, DATED MAY 12, 1999 RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 199961628 OF THE OFFICIAL
PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS.
(SHOWN HEREON)
g.EASEMENT AS SHOWN IN INSTRUMENT FROM CARRIE ANN BARTON-SMITH TO CITY OF
GEORGETOWN, DATED SEPTEMBER 8, 1999 RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 199961629 OF THE
OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS.
(SHOWN HEREON)
h.EASEMENT AS SHOWN IN INSTRUMENT FROM CARRIE ANN BARTON-SMITH TO CITY OF
GEORGETOWN, DATED SEPTEMBER 8, 1999 RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 199961630 OF THE
OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS.
(SHOWN HEREON)
i.EASEMENT AS SHOWN IN INSTRUMENT FROM CHARLES GRADY BARTON AND CARRIE ANN
BARTON-SMITH TO BRUSHY CREEK MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT, DATED APRIL 15, 2004
RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2004029224 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON
COUNTY, TEXAS.
( SHOWN HEREON)
j.EASEMENT AS SHOWN IN INSTRUMENT FROM CHARLES GRADY BARTON AND CARRIE ANN
BARTON-SMITH TO BRUSHY CREEK MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT, DATED APRIL 15, 2004
RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2004029225 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON
COUNTY, TEXAS.
(SHOWN HEREON)
k.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS CONTAINED IN ROAD AND SEWER LINE
AGREEMENT EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN CHARLES GRADY BARTON AND CARRIE ANN
BARTON-SMITH, AND LAREDO WO, LTD., DATED FEBRUARY 22, 2007, RECORDED IN DOCUMENT
NO. 2007014284 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS.
(SHOWN HEREON)
l.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS CONTAINED IN MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT TO
SELL AND PURCHASE EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN CHARLES GRADY BARTON AND CARRIE ANN
BARTON-SMITH, AND LAREDO WO, LTD., DATED FEBRUARY 22, 2007, RECORDED IN DOCUMENT
NO. 2007014283 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS.
CALLED 195.193 ACRES
DOC. NO. 2007014280
OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS
WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS
CALLED 78.399 ACRES
DOC. NO. 2007014290
OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS
WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS
CALLED 203.137 ACRES
DOC. NO. 2007014282
OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS
WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS
ROAD AND
SEWER LINE
EASEMENT ITEM
10. k.
ROAD AND
SEWER LINE
EASEMENT ITEM
10. k.
FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD
FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD WITH A YELLOW "BURY & PARTNERS" PLASTIC CAP
FOUND 3/8" IRON ROD
FOUND COTTON SPINDLE
FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD WITH A RED "FOREST 1847" PLASTIC CAP
FOUND 2" PIPE
FOUND PK NAIL
FOUND TYPE 1 CONCRETE MARKER
FOUND 60-D NAIL
LEGEND
P.O.B.POINT OF BEGINNING
SET 1/2" IRON ROD WITH A RED "MATKIN-HOOVER
ENG. & SURVEY." PLASTIC CAP
S
H
E
L
F
R
O
C
K
R
O
A
D
V
A
R
I
A
B
L
E
W
I
D
T
H
R
O
W
MATCHLINE SHEET 5
MATKIN HOOVER
ENGINEERING & SURVEYING
AARON NEUMANN, P.E.
8 SPENCER ROAD SUITE 100
BOERNE, TEXAS 78006
OFF: (830) 249-0600
FAX: (830) 249-0099
GKELLER@MATKINHOOVER.COM
NOTES:
1) FIELD WORK PERFORMED ON: APRIL 19, 2016
2) BORROWER: EDWIN H. VALE JR.
3) ADDRESS: 3300 FM 2243, GEORGETOWN, TEXAS 78628.
4) BASIS OF BEARING: WAS ESTABLISHED USING THE TRIMBLE VRS NETWORK, NAD83, TEXAS
STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, CENTRAL ZONE, 4203, US SURVEY FOOT, GRID.
5) THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON A TITLE COMMITMENT ISSUED BY OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE
INSURANCE COMPANY, G.F. NUMBER 31311, ISSUED DATE OF FEBRUARY 08, 2016 EFFECTIVE
DATE OF JANUARY 26, 2016 AND IS SUBJECT TO ALL TERMS, CONDITIONS, LEASES AND
ENCUMBRANCES STIPULATED THEREIN. THERE MAY BE OTHER EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS, OR
ENCUMBRANCES NOT SHOWN.THE SURVEYOR DID NOT COMPLETE AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE.
6) SEE SHEET 1 OF 7 FOR LINE AND CURVE TABLES.
SENSITIVE FEATURE
BUFFER ZONE
EDWIN H. VALE JR.
2301 FEDERAL ST.
KILLEEN, TX 26543
J. THOMPSON
SURVEY
ABSTRACT NO. 608
J. THOMPSON
SURVEY
ABSTRACT NO. 608
10
'
P
.
U
.
E
10
'
P
.
U
.
E
LOT 25
1.01 AC.
LOT 26
1.67 AC.
LOT 1
1.01 AC.
LOT 2
1.01 AC.
LOT 3
1.01 AC.LOT 4
1.31 AC.
LOT 5
1.11 AC.
LOT 6
1.20 AC.
LOT 7
1.22 AC.
LOT 8
1.03 AC.
LOT 1
1.01 AC.N7
5
°
4
3
'
5
7
"
E
4
3
3
.
3
6
'
BLOCK A
BLOCK B
BLOCK B
BLOCK C
SCALE: 1"=100'
0 50'100'150'200'
O.S.S.F. SETBACK
SEE SHEET 5 OF 8 FOR
DIMENSION DETAIL
SENSITIVE FEATURE
BUFFER ZONE
SEE SHEET 5 OF 8 FOR
DIMENSION DETAIL
LOT 1
3.12 AC.
BLOCK D
LOT 18
1.64 AC.
LOT 19
1.57 AC.
BLOCK A LOT 17
1.44 AC.
LOT 14
1.16 AC.
LOT 1005
3.87 AC.
RO
C
K
R
I
V
E
R
R
O
A
D
50
'
W
I
D
E
R
I
G
H
T
-
O
F
-
W
A
Y
CURVE TABLE
CURVE
C55
C56
C57
C58
C59
C60
RADIUS
200.00'
50.00'
50.00'
150.00'
150.00'
150.00'
LENGTH
123.06'
157.08'
122.73'
44.83'
715.50'
318.17'
DELTA
35°15'11"
180°00'00"
140°38'24"
17°07'30"
273°18'02"
121°31'50"
CHORD BEARING
S13° 26' 47"W
N20° 17' 31"W
S00° 36' 42"E
S54° 58' 17"W
N73° 06' 59"W
N30° 59' 55"E
CHORD LENGTH
121.12'
100.00'
94.16'
44.67'
205.93'
261.79'
SH
E
L
F
R
O
C
K
R
O
A
D
VAR
I
A
B
L
E
W
I
D
T
H
R
O
W
N20° 54' 49"W
91.56'
N20° 54' 49"W 236.60'
N20° 54' 49"W
40.20'
N20° 54' 49"W 147.21'
C
5
8
C5
5
C57
C
6
0
C59
SENSITIVE FEATURE
BUFFER ZONE
O.S.S.F. SETBACK7
4
.
8
7
'
S
2
9
°
0
0
'
3
5
"
W
S
2
9
°
1
9
'
1
5
"
W
1
3
1
.
4
3
'
S69
°
5
4
'
1
6
"
E
1
6
3
.
9
4
'
SENSITIVE FEATURE
BUFFER ZONE
SEE THIS SHEET FOR
DIMENSION DETAIL
O.S.S.F. SETBACK
SEE THIS SHEET FOR
DIMENSION DETAIL
50.00'
60.0
0
'
DATE: JULY 2017
TREE
1
5
7
.
0
0
'
1
5
7
.
0
0
'
1
0
0
.
0
0
'
VARIABLE WIDTH EMERGENCY
ACCESS EASEMENT
R=50.00'
L=35.47'
∆=40°38'36"
CB=S89° 58' 13"E
CH=34.73'
R=565.00'
L=80.58'
∆=8°10'18"
CB=S16° 01' 27"E
CH=80.51'
R=50.00'
L=28.02'
∆=32°06'28"
CB=S53° 39' 15"W
CH=27.65'
CITY PROJECT NO. -
PP-2016-011
Page 33 of 87
890
8
6
0
8
7
0
87
0
880
8
9
0
90
0
910
8
7
0
9
0
0
9
1
0
8
6
0
860
8
7
0
88
0
9
1
0
9
1
0
920
9
2
0
910
9
1
0
5581
5322
55795580
5588
5573
OWNER/DEVELOPER:AGENT/PREPARER:
ENGINEERING
& SURVEYING
CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS LAND PLANNERS CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS CONSULTANTS
P.O. BOX 54
8 SPENCER ROAD SUITE 100
BOERNE, TEXAS 78006
OFFICE: 830.249.0600 FAX:830.249.0099
TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-004512
TEXAS REGISTERED SURVEYING FIRM F-10024000
SCALE: 1"=100'
0 50'100'150'200'
MATKIN HOOVER
ENGINEERING & SURVEYING
AARON NEUMANN, P.E.
8 SPENCER ROAD SUITE 100
BOERNE, TEXAS 78006
OFF: (830) 249-0600
FAX: (830) 249-0099
GKELLER@MATKINHOOVER.COM
S0
8
°
3
2
'
3
5
"
W
3
8
7
.
0
9
'
S06
°
3
8
'
4
6
"
W
1
2
1
.
3
6
'
S06
°
3
8
'
4
6
"
W
1
3
2
.
8
7
'
S
5
0
°
3
8
'
4
4
"
W
3
7
3
.
2
0
'
S
5
0
°
3
8
'
4
4
"
W
3
7
4
.
1
6
'
S0
8
°
3
2
'
3
5
"
W
3
1
7
.
8
0
'
N20° 17' 31"W
134.22'
N50° 58' 13"W
1.46'
N50° 58' 13"W
59.21'
N50° 58' 13"W
67.90
N20° 54' 49"W
85.74'N20° 54' 49"W
101.67'N20° 54' 49"W
173.02'
CITY OF GEORGETOWN
WATER QUALITY BUFFER ZONE
50' O.S.S.F. SETBACK
O.S.S.F. SETBACK
APPROXIMATE
EDGE OF WATER
SHELF ROCK ROAD
VARIABLE WIDTH ROW
O.S.S.F. SETBACK
RIV
E
R
R
O
C
K
R
O
A
D
50
'
W
I
D
E
R
I
G
H
T
-
O
F
-
W
A
Y
EDWIN H. VALE JR.
2301 FEDERAL ST.
KILLEEN, TX 26543
LI
V
E
R
O
C
K
R
O
A
D
50
'
W
I
D
E
R
I
G
H
T
-
O
F
-
W
A
Y
LOT 18
1.64 AC.
LOT 19
1.57 AC.
LOT 4
1.29 AC.
LOT 1
3.12 AC.
LOT 14
1.16 AC.
LOT 15
1.70 AC.
LOT 16
1.27 AC.LOT 17
1.44 AC.
LOT 502
3.87 AC.
LOT 10
1.11 AC.
LOT 11
1.08 AC.
LOT 12
1.01 AC.
LOT 13
1.01 AC.
LOT 8
1.01 AC.
LOT 9
1.01 AC.
LOT 1
1.19 AC.
LOT 2
1.15 AC.
LOT 1004
0.17 AC.
LOT 1003
0.10 AC.
O.S.S.F. SETBACK
SEE SHEET 6 OF 8 FOR
DIMENSION DETAIL
SENSITIVE FEATURE
BUFFER ZONE
SEE SHEET 6 OF 8 FOR
DIMENSION DETAIL
DATE: JULY 2017
TREE
LEGEND
S20° 54' 49"E 695.88'
S65° 54' 49"E
32.39'
S04° 35' 36"W
3.43'
S69° 05' 11"W
56.42'
35
.
0
0
'
81.85
'
S55°
2
1
'
2
7
"
E
10
1
.
2
2
'
N7
2
°
2
7
'
1
6
"
E
102.05
'
S46° 1
2
'
3
2
"
E
63
.
4
7
'
N7
0
°
0
5
'
1
9
"
E
N8
1
°
0
8
'
0
8
"
E
1
3
8
.
6
1
'
N19° 26' 04"W 178.61'
N54°
1
4
'
3
6
"
W
1
4
5
.
4
4
'
N10° 30' 03
"
W
89.69'N54° 40' 03"W
53.84'
N81
°
2
0
'
4
3
"
W
1
3
6
.
5
6
'
S79° 09' 46"W
48.37'
1
2
7
.
6
4
'
S
3
7
°
2
4
'
4
6
"
W
85
.
7
6
'
S
1
9
°
1
6
'
0
6
"
W
S30° 09' 43"E
1
8
2
.
9
9
'
S
1
8
°
2
3
'
5
8
"
W
2
2
4
.
6
6
'
N1
1
°
5
3
'
5
8
"
E
2
1
8
.
6
8
'
VARIABLE WIDTH EMERGENCY
ACCESS EASEMENT N20° 54' 49"W
84.81'
S
4
2
°
4
0
'
1
3
"
W
9
2
.
0
9
'
S0
8
°
3
9
'
3
4
"
W
1
1
6
.
3
8
'
S
4
7
°
1
5
'
5
9
"
W
2
5
2
.
6
1
'
S07
°
1
5
'
4
3
"
W
3
3
9
.
1
2
'
9
6
.
6
7
'
S
3
6
°
0
5
'
2
9
"
W
S02°
0
1
'
3
8
"
E
102.5
2
'
S
4
0
°
2
1
'
3
4
"
W
1
0
9
.
8
8
'
S
3
6
°
5
8
'
2
2
"
W
9
8
.
2
9
'
S01°
3
3
'
3
5
"
W
66.4
6
'
S
2
3
°
4
6
'
4
5
"
W
7
0
.
2
0
'
S
4
7
°
4
3
'
0
7
"
W
1
5
0
.
9
3
'
S
5
3
°
4
9
'
0
4
"
W
1
1
3
.
6
8
'
CITY PROJECT NO. -
PP-2016-011
Page 34 of 87
Page 35 of 87
City of Georgetown, Texas
Planning and Zoning
November 7, 2017
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing and possible action on a reques t to Rezone approximately 4.40 ac res in the Fish Survey
lo cated at 4819 Williams Drive fro m the Neighb o rhood Commerc ial (CN) Dis tric t, to Lo cal Commerc ial
(C-1) Dis tric t loc ated at 4819 Williams Drive (R EZ-2017-022) - And reina Davila-Quintero , Current Planning
Manager.
ITEM SUMMARY:
Background:
The ap p licant is req ues ting to rezone the 4.40-ac re property, lo cated at 4819 Williams Drive, from the
Neighborho od Commerc ial (CN) zo ning d is tric t to the Loc al Co mmercial (C -1) zo ning d is tric t. The
p ro p erty is currently the s ite o f Georgetown Mortgage (on the eas t p o rtion) and the remaining portio n o f
the property is und eveloped.
Staff's Analysis
The p ro p o s ed req ues t meets the ap p ro val criteria o f the Unified Development C o d e for a zoning map
amendment (rezoning).
Public Comments:
A to tal o f 13 no tic es we mailed to the property owners lo cated within 200 feet of the sub ject property
within the city limits , p o s ted o n the Williams on C o unty S un on Oc tober 22, 2017, and posted on site. As
p art o f the firs t rezoning reques t (REZ-2017-022), pub lic comments were s ub mitted via email and
acc o unted for 20.6% of the protes t area. The s ame p ublic c o mments has b een inc luded as part of this
req uest (Attac hment 5).
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None. The applic ant has paid all applic ation fees .
SUBMITTED BY:
Chels ea Irby, Planner, and Andreina Dávila-Q uintero, Current Planning Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
REZ-2017-022 - Staff Report Backup Material
Attachment 1 - Location Map Exhibit
Attachment 2 - Future Land Us e Map Exhibit
Attachment 3 - Zoning Map Exhibit
Attachment 4 - C-1 dis trict Development Standards and Permitted
Land Us es
Exhibit
Attachment 5 - Public Comments Exhibit
Page 36 of 87
Georgetown Planning Department Staff Report
REZ-2017-033 - 4819 Williams Drive
CN to C-1 Page 1 of 4
Report Date: November 3, 2017
File No: REZ-2017-022
Project Planner: Chelsea Irby
Item Details
Project Name: 4819 Williams Drive
Project Address: 4819 Williams Drive
Total Acreage: 4.40 acres
Legal Description: S10307 - CHAPRIEL PLACE, Lot 1-C, ACRES 4.4
Existing Zoning: Neighborhood Commercial (CN)
Proposed Zoning: Local Commercial (C-1)
Applicant: Compostela, c/o Scott Stribling
Property Owner: Penny Lane Partners LTD, c/o Roy Jones
Case History: This is the second request to rezone the subject property to Local Commercial (C-
1). The first application was submitted on July 12, 2017. However, this request
was later withdrawn on September 5, 2017, per the applicant’s request.
Overview of Applicant’s Request
The applicant is requesting to rezone the 4.40-acre property, located at 4819 Williams Drive, from the
Neighborhood Commercial (CN) zoning district to the Local Commercial (C-1) zoning district. The
property is currently the site of Georgetown Mortgage (on the east portion) and the remaining portion
of the property is undeveloped.
Page 37 of 87
Planning Department Staff Report
REZ-2017-022 - 4819 Williams Drive
CN to C-1 Page 2 of 4
Site Information
Location:
The property is located at the northeast corner of Williams Drive and Penny Lane, just adjacent to the
Olde Oak subdivision.
Physical Characteristics:
The property has a building (Georgetown Mortage) on the southeast corner. The remaining portion of
the property is undeveloped, flat, and has little tree cover. The property is not located within the
floodplain.
Surrounding Properties:
Location Zoning Future Land Use Existing Use
North AG Low Density Residential Residential
South CN/C-1 Low Density Residential Undeveloped
East AG Low Density Residential CrossFit 365 gym
West OF Low Density Residential Undeveloped
Property History
The property was annexed into the City in 1995 (Ordinance 95-12) and zoned Agricultural (AG). In
2003, the property was rezoned from Agricultural (AG) to Office and Service Use (RM-3) by Ordinance
2003-22, which was later converted to the Office (OF) zoning district with the adoption of the Unified
Development Code (UDC) in 2003. In 2007, it was rezoned from Office (OF) to Neighborhood
Commercial (CN) by Ordinance 2007-97. The property is located in the Gateway Overlay District, more
specifically the Scenic/Natural Gateway overlay district.
2030 Comprehensive Plan
Future Land Use:
The property is designated as Low Density Residential on the Future Land Use Map.
• This category includes the city’s predominantly single-family neighborhoods that can be
accommodated at a density between 1.1 and 3 dwelling units per gross acre. Conservation
subdivisions are also encouraged in this land use district. Modifications to development
standards applicable to this category could address minimum open space requirements, public
facility impacts, and greater roadway connectivity.
• This category may also support complementary non-residential uses along arterial roadways
such as neighborhood-serving retail, office, institutional, and civic uses, although such uses may
not be depicted on the Future Land Use Map. Standards should be established to maximize
compatibility of these uses with adjacent land uses, minimize traffic congestion and overloading
of public infrastructure, and also ensure a high standard of site, landscape, and architectural
design.
Page 38 of 87
Planning Department Staff Report
REZ-2017-022 - 4819 Williams Drive
CN to C-1 Page 3 of 4
Growth Tier:
The property is in Growth Tier 1A (Short Term Growth Area – 10 Years) on the Growth Tier Map.
• Tier 1A is that portion of the city where infrastructure systems are in place, or can be
economically provided and where the bulk of the city’s growth should be guided over the near
term. Within Tier 1A, the city is called on to conduct assessments of public facility conditions
and capacities (Policy 2B.1) and to prioritize short and long term capital investments so as to
ensure that infrastructure capacity is sufficient to serve development intensities as indicated on
the Future Land Use Map and in the zoning districts.
Transportation
The property currently has access from Williams Drive and has the potential for access from Penny
Lane. There are no new roadways planned through the subject property.
Utilities
The property is near existing water and wastewater mains. The existing water main runs down
Williams Drive and the wastewater main is located on the opposite side of Williams Drive from the
southeast corner of the property.
Proposed Zoning District
The Local Commercial (C-1) zoning district is intended to provide areas for commercial and retail
activities that primarily serve residential uses. Uses should have pedestrian access to adjacent and
nearby residential areas, but are not appropriate along residential streets or residential collectors. The
C-1 district is more appropriate along major and minor thoroughfares and corridors.
Staff Analysis
Comply Do Not
Comply Approval Criteria for Rezoning
X
The application is complete
and the information contained
within the application is
sufficient and correct enough
to allow adequate review and
final action.
Yes.
X
The zoning change is
consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan
The Low Density Residential category allows for
non-residential uses along arterial roadways.
X
The zoning change promotes
the health, safety or general
welfare of the City and the safe
orderly, and healthful
development of the City
The subject property is located at the intersection
of a major arterial and local street. The
Comprehensive Plan supports non-residential
uses in this area to serve neighborhoods within
the vicinity. Therefore, the proposed zoning
Page 39 of 87
Planning Department Staff Report
REZ-2017-022 - 4819 Williams Drive
CN to C-1 Page 4 of 4
district promotes the safe, orderly, and healthful
development of the City.
X
The zoning change is
compatible with the present
zoning and conforming uses of
nearby property and with the
character of the neighborhood
The current zoning on the property is
Neighborhood Commercial (CN) and the
properties across Williams Drive are zoned
Neighborhood Commercial (CN) and Local
Commercial (C-1).
X
The property to be rezoned is
suitable for uses permitted by
the District that would be
applied by the proposed
amendment.
The property has an existing commercial/office
use.
General Findings
Based on all the information presented above, staff has made the following findings:
1. The properties across Williams Drive is already zoned for commercial uses (CN and C-1).
2. The property is already being utilized as a form of commercial.
3. The Local Commercial (C-1) district is compatible with near residential areas.
Public Comments
A total of 13 notices we mailed to the property owners located within 200 feet of the subject property
within the city limits, posted on the Williamson County Sun on October 22, 2017, and posted on site.
As part of the first rezoning request (REZ-2017-022), public comments were submitted via email and
accounted for 20.6% of the protest area. The same public comments has been included as part of this
request (Attachment 5).
Attachments
Attachment 1 – Location Map
Attachment 2 – Future Land Use Map
Attachment 3 – Zoning Map
Attachment 4 – C-1 District Development Standards and Permitted Land Uses
Attachment 5 – Public Comments
Page 40 of 87
")2338
D el W e b b B l v d
D elWebbBlvd
WilliamsDr
WilliamsDr
W
illia
ms
Dr
Lake w ay Dr
Lakeway D r
DB
W
o
o
d
R
d
B ooty'sCrossingRd
Shell
Rd
ShellRd
S h ell R d
")3405
¬«195
Sun
City
B
lv
d
")262 Jim H o g g Rd
S eren a da D r
N
orth
w
estBlvd
Lake w ay Dr
N L a k e w o od s D r
")262
S e d r o T rl
")2338
Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only
¯
Location MapREZ-2017-022Exhibit #1
LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
0 0.5 1Mi
Page 41 of 87
WIL
L
I
A
M
S
D
R
PENNY LN
SEDRO TR
L
BIG BEND
T
R
L
LIMESTO N E L AKEDR
C A P R O C K CAN Y O N T R L
WOO
D
L
A
K
E
D
R
LA
K
E
S
I
D
E
R
A
N
C
H
R
D
A
C
K
E
R
R
D
F
O
R
T
D
A
V
I
S
S
T
VERDE VISTA
OLDE O
A
K
D
R
L A K E S P R I N G C I R
LAKERIMCIR
O L I V E C R E E K DR
HAYS
H
I
L
L
D
R
B
I
G
S
P
R
I
N
G
S
T
L O S T M A P L E S TR L
M
O
RELAND
DR
FLATCREEKCT
T
E
R
I
C
T
LAKE CAVERN
C
T
D R I F T W O O D H I L L S WAY
WOOD S T OC
K
D
R
GATL
I
N
C
R
E
E
K
D
R
OLIV
E
C
R
E
E
K
D
R
M
O
R
E
L
A
N
D
D
R
Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only
¯
Future Land Use / Overall Transportation PlanREZ-2017-022
Exhibit #2
Legend
Thoroughfare
Future Land Use
Institutional
Regional Commercial
Community Commercial
Employment Center
Low Density Residential
Mining
Mixed Use Community
Mixed Use Neighborhood Center
Moderate Density Residential
Open Space
Specialty Mixed Use Area
Ag / Rural Residential
Existing Collector
Existing Freeway
Existing Major Arterial
Existing Minor Arterial
Existing Ramp
Proposed Collector
Proposed Freeway
Propsed Frontage Road
Proposed Major Arterial
Proposed Minor Arterial
Proposed Railroad
High Density Residential
Legend
SiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
0 500 1,000Feet
Page 42 of 87
WIL
L
I
A
M
S
D
R
PENNY LN
SEDRO TR
L
BIG BEND
T
R
L
LIMESTO N E L AKEDR
C A P R O C K CAN Y O N T R L
WOO
D
L
A
K
E
D
R
LA
K
E
S
I
D
E
R
A
N
C
H
R
D
A
C
K
E
R
R
D
F
O
R
T
D
A
V
I
S
S
T
VERDE VISTA
OLDE O
A
K
D
R
L A K E S P R I N G C I R
LAKERIMCIR
O L I V E C R E E K DR
HAYS
H
I
L
L
D
R
B
I
G
S
P
R
I
N
G
S
T
L O S T M A P L E S TR L
M
O
RELAND
DR
FLATCREEKCT
T
E
R
I
C
T
LAKE CAVERN
C
T
D R I F T W O O D H I L L S WAY
WOOD S T OC
K
D
R
GATL
I
N
C
R
E
E
K
D
R
OLIV
E
C
R
E
E
K
D
R
M
O
R
E
L
A
N
D
D
R
Zoning InformationREZ-2017-022Exhibit #3
Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only
LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
¯
0 500 1,000Feet
Page 43 of 87
Minimum Lot Width = 50 feet Front Setback = 25 feet Bufferyard = 15 feet with plantings
Maximum Building Height = 35 feet (0 feet for build‐to option) adjacent to AG, RE, RL, RS, TF, MH,
Maximum Building Size = .5 FAR Side Setback = 10 feet MF‐1, or MF‐2 districts
(only applies to those uses Side Setback to Residential = 15 feet
marked with * below) Rear Setback = 0 feet
Rear Setback to Residential = 25 feet
Allowed by Right Subject to Limitations Special Use Permit (SUP) Required
Agricultural Sales* Activity Center (youth/senior) Event Facility
Artisan Studio/Gallery* Bar/Tavern/Pub Meat Market
Assisted Living Bed and Breakfast (with events) Multifamily Attached
Automotive Parts Sales (indoor)* Business/Trade School Personal Services Restricted
Banking/Financial Services* Car Wash Private Transport Dispatch Facility
Blood/Plasma Center* Church (with columbarium) Student Housing
Consumer Repair* College/University
Dry Cleaning Service* Commercial Recreation
Emergency Services Station Community Center
Farmer's Market* Dance Hall/Night Club
Fitness Center* Day Care (group/commercial)
Food Catering Services* Fuel Sales
Funeral Home* Live Music/Entertainment
General Retail* Micro Brewery/Winery
General Office* Neighborhood Amenity Center
Government/Postal Office Park (neighborhood/regional)
Group Home (7+ residents) Pest Control/Janitorial Services *
Home Health Care Services* Self‐Storage (indoor only)
Hospital School (Elementary, Middle, High)
Hotel/Inn (excluding extended stay) Theater (movie/live)
Integrated Office Center* Upper‐story Residential
Landscape/Garden Sales* Wireless Transmission Facility (<41')
Laundromat*
Library/Museum
Medical Diagnostic Center*
Medical Office/Clinic/Complex*
Membership Club/Lodge*
Nature Preserve/Community Garden
Nursing/Convalescent/Hospice
Parking Lot (commercial/park‐n‐ride)
Personal Services*
Printing/Mailing/Copying Services*
Restaurant (general/drive‐through)*
Rooming/Boarding House
Social Service Facility
Surgery/Post Surgery Recovery*
Urgent Care Facility*
Utilities (Minor/Intermediate/Major)
Veterinary Clinic (indoor only)*
Local Commercial (C‐1) District
District Development Standards
Specific Uses Allowed within the District
Page 44 of 87
From:Karen Miller
To:Chelsea Irby
Subject:REZ-2017-022 - 4819 Williams Dr
Date:Monday, October 23, 2017 11:41:17 AM
Chelsea,
It looks like this is the same filing that was brought up in REZ-2017-013. Are there any
changes? Has the individual filing the request changed? Also, the neighbors submitted a
number of comments to the last filing. Will those be included, or should we re-send them?
Please feel free to give me a call if that would be easier.
Thanks,
Karen Miller
910-915-5261
ATTACHMENT 5 - Public Comments
Page 45 of 87
ATTACHMENT 5 - Public Comments
Page 46 of 87
1
Chelsea Irby
From:Sofia Nelson
Sent:Wednesday, August 30, 2017 9:48 AM
To:Chelsea Irby
Cc:Andreina Davila; Chris Yanez
Subject:FW: Neighbor feedback regarding RAZ-2017-013 - 4819 Williams Dr
Attachments:Objection to zoning change 29Aug2017.pdf
Chelsea and Andreina,
Please below and attached. I have shared the email with the applicant. Can you guys have GIS run a 20% protest
calculation on this as soon as possible?
From: Karen Miller [mailto:miller.karen.joy@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 9:24 AM
To: Sofia Nelson <Sofia.Nelson@georgetown.org>
Subject: Neighbor feedback regarding RAZ‐2017‐013 ‐ 4819 Williams Dr
Sofia,
I've attached a letter we, the neighborhood immediately behind the property in question, submit for the zoning office,
zoning commission, and city councils consideration.
We object to changing the zoning of 4819 Williams Dr from CN to C-1.
Rezoning must be consistent with the comprehensive plan. The existing zoning is consistent with the comprehensive
plan, as well as the Williams Drive study. In the plans posted online, the area is slated to remain low density
residential. Zoning should remain the same to make the property consistent with the comprehensive plan. Furthermore,
per the 2030 Comprehensive Plan “C-1… is not meant to be located along residential streets or collectors.” (pg 3.14) A
large portion of this property borders Penny Ln, which is a collector. The neighborhood has concerns that Penny Lane is
already becoming too busy due to neighboring construction. Please restrict any commercial development on 4819
Williams Dr from utilizing Penny Ln.
The zoning change must promote health, safety, or general welfare of the city and the safe orderly, and healthful
development of the city. The existing development on 4819 Williams Dr has proven to flood the neighboring properties,
which still rely on shallow septic systems. Regardless of the safeguards put in place, denser development will result in
greater difficulty managing run-off. The existing zoning aligns with the environmental constraints of the area. Rezoning
creates a greater risk of over-developing the property and worsening the environmental risks associated with flooding
septic systems.
The zoning change must be compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the
character of the neighborhood. The properties surrounding this property are all zoned agricultural or are vacant. This
property immediately borders low density residential housing - housing situated on 1 to 2.5 acres. The current zoning,
neighborhood commercial, is compatible with its neighbors, provided a natural wooded buffer is restored on the property
in order to restore privacy and protection from Williams Drive to the neighborhood. Rezoning the property to C-1 would
permit a variety of high traffic, loud, 24/7 uses, especially gas stations, that are unacceptable to a quiet, agriculturally
zoned neighborhood.
I'm happy to discuss further if needed.
Thanks,
Karen Miller
100 Teri Ct
910-915-5261
ATTACHMENT 5 - Public Comments
Page 47 of 87
1
Chelsea Irby
From:Sofia Nelson
Sent:Sunday, August 20, 2017 1:46 PM
To:Chelsea Irby
Subject:FW: zoning change notice
Please add this to the zoning file and add to the PZ and CC novus item when you are creating agenda material.
Thank you
From: Fred Wagner [mailto:fred_wagner@suddenlink.net]
Sent: Saturday, August 19, 2017 8:32 PM
To: Sofia Nelson <Sofia.Nelson@georgetown.org>
Subject: zoning change notice
Hello Sofia,
I received the notice of the public hearing on a request to rezone some land in our neighborhood. (REZ-2017-013 - 4819
Williams Drive) Wasn't this already discussed and acted on in 2006/2007, or is this a different parcel adjacent to the one
I'm thinking of?
Regardless, the neighborhood wasn't supportive of a zoning change back then and probably will not be this time either.
The concern most of us had at that time was the differences between the current CN and C-1 and the potential disruption
of the quality of the neighborhood if the limits of the C-1 zoning were to be actualized. The CN zoning was felt to be
much more sympathetic to the concerns of the neighborhood and would not severely limit the development possibilities
for that property. The owners, at that time, had presented the neighborhood with their plan which included architectural
renderings of the elevations especially in the rear that helped ease the concerns of those neighbors who would border on
that property. There was no discussion of changing the zoning by the property owners at that time. The first we heard of it
was when we got the notification from your office and that didn't sit well with the neighborhood. None of us are opposed
to development of the property but we were united in our opposition to changing the zoning. As things turned out, we
were not all able to attend the second hearing of the City Council on 12-11-06 and the rest is history.
Some of the other issues brought up were mostly due to the traffic problems. Since that time Williams Dr. has been
improved but the increase in development of Sun City and numerous areas farther out have increased traffic to a
significant extent once again making it difficult to make a left turn out of any of the side streets unloading onto Williams
Dr. in the vicinity of the property being discussed. Another business with access to Williams Dr. will not improve the
situation. I'm not sure if there are plans on changing any of that to improve the safety of Williams Dr. or not, but this is a
very real concern not just for our neighborhood but those folks on Olde Oaks and Sedro Tr. as well.
One of the members of the Council commented at that time that the Williams Dr. situation wasn't as choked as
SH29/University Ave, but the speed limit wasn't 60 mph in town either. Since the improvements to Williams Dr. the
speed limit is now 50 but it's still significantly more than in town and a bit riskier to try making left turns.
I have no idea of what kind of business is planned for the property and am happy to see something that fits within the CN
zoning limits but I would be opposed to a zoning change that would change to C-1 and have more potential to disrupt the
neighborhood.
Best regards,
Fred Wagner
120 Penny Ln.
ATTACHMENT 5 - Public Comments
Page 48 of 87
ATTACHMENT 5 - Public Comments
Page 49 of 87
ATTACHMENT 5 - Public Comments
Page 50 of 87
From:Sofia Nelson
To:Andreina Davila; Chelsea Irby
Subject:FW: RAZ-2017-013; 4819 Williams Drive
Date:Wednesday, September 27, 2017 11:00:45 AM
Even though we have closed the case please add it the case folder.
From: Randy Hartford [hartfordemail@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2017 10:35 AM
To: Sofia Nelson
Cc: hartfordemail@yahoo.com
Subject: RAZ-2017-013; 4819 Williams Drive
Hi Sofia,
Thank you for taking time to visit with me this morning regarding this rezoning request. My
wife and I respectfully express our opposition to this zoning change request.
We share many of the same concerns as those in the Teri Court & Penny Lane area.
Additional traffic, light and noise from C1 development will adversely effect the quality of life
for the residents living on residential only streets, on extending both directions off of Williams
Drive.
The change from AG to CN was an acceptable compromise at that time and adequately
supports the business needs in that area. The HEB area development provides for many of the
needs allowed with C1 zoning and is less than a mile away. In addition Gatlin Creek is only a
few hundred feet away and includes C1 zoning and further along Williams Drive will be the
Randall's Grocery development. There are already many empty commercial properties along
Williams Drive.
Sincerely,
Randy and Melanie Hartford
103 Olde Oak Dr.
Georgetown, TX 78633
ATTACHMENT 5 - Public Comments
Page 51 of 87
City of Georgetown, Texas
Planning and Zoning
November 7, 2017
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing and p o s s ib le ac tion on a reques t fo r a Special Use Permit to allo w multi-family units in
the General Commerc ial (C-3) d is tric t, appro ximately 10.6 ac res in the N. Porter S urvey lo cated at 1515
and 1531 Rivery Blvd. (S UP -2017-007, Summit Wes t) Chels ea Irby, Planner
ITEM SUMMARY:
Background:
The ap p licant has reques ted cons id eration of a Spec ial Us e P ermit (SUP) to allow multi-family units in the
General Commerc ial (C-3) zoning district. The propos ed p ro ject will bring more o wner-o cc upied
cond o miniums to the Rivery area, similar to the exis ting brownsto nes just to the eas t of Rivery Blvd. The
cond o s are planned as two-sto ry units to b etter fit with the neighb o rhood and s urro und ing us es . These
units will als o p ro vide mo re c usto mers for the many retail, s ervic e, and entertainment o p tions that are
available in walking and b iking d is tance. The ap p licant p ro p o s es a maximum o f 89 d welling units (8.39
d welling units /ac re).
Public Comment:
All p ro p erty o wners within a 200-fo o t rad ius of the s ub ject property that are lo c ated within City limits were
notified of the SUP applic ation (15 notices mailed), a legal notice ad vertis ing the pub lic hearing was p laced
in the Sun News p ap er (Oc tober 22, 2017) and s igns were posted on-s ite. To d ate, s taff has rec eived no
written c o mments .
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None studied at this time.
SUBMITTED BY:
Chels ea Irby, Planner and Sofia Nelson, CNU-A, P lanning Directo r
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Staff Report Backup Material
Attachment 1 - Location Map Exhibit
Attachment 2 - Future Land Us e Map Exhibit
Attachment 3 - Zoning Map Exhibit
Attachment 4 - Aerial Map Exhibit
Attachment 5 - Conceptual Plan Exhibit
Page 52 of 87
Georgetown Planning Department Staff Report
Summit West | SUP-2017-007
Special Use Permit Page 1 of 6
Report Date: November 3, 2017
File No: SUP-2017-007
Project Planner: Chelsea Irby, Planner
Item Details
Project Name: Summit West
Project Address: 1515 and 1531 Rivery Blvd
Total Acreage: 10.6 acres
Legal Description: S9005 - RIVERY PARK 2 (BLK B AMD), BLOCK B, Lot 4, ACRES 6.266
S9005 - RIVERY PARK 2 (BLK B AMD), BLOCK B, Lot 3, ACRES 4.354
Existing Zoning: General Commercial (C-3)
Applicant: RP Georgetown Development Co LLC, c/o Mark Allen
Representative: Sprouse Shrader Smith PLLC, c/o Terrence L. Irion
Property Owner: RP Georgetown Development Co LLC, c/o Mark Allen
Overview of Applicant’s Request
The applicant has requested consideration of a Special Use Permit (SUP) to allow multi-
family units in the General Commercial (C-3) zoning district. The proposed project will bring
more owner-occupied condominiums to the Rivery area, similar to the existing brownstones
just to the east of Rivery Blvd. The condos are planned as two-story units to better fit with the
neighborhood and surrounding uses. These units will also provide more customers for the
many retail, service, and entertainment options that are available in walking and biking
distance. The applicant proposes a maximum of 89 dwelling units (8.39 dwelling units/acre).
Location Map
Page 53 of 87
Planning Department Staff Report
Summit West | SUP-2017-007
Special Use Permit Page 2 of 6
Site Information
Location:
The subject site is located along Rivery Blvd, just north of the intersection with Wolf Ranch
Parkway.
Physical Characteristics:
The subject site has approximately 600 feet of frontage along Rivery Blvd and shares a property
line with the City Light Theatre and the Baylor, Scott, & White Clinic. It is also located south of
the north for of the San Gabriel River.
Surrounding Properties:
Location Zoning Future Land Use Existing Use
North General Commercial (C-3) Open Space Open Space/Parkland
South General Commercial (C-3) Regional Commercial Medical facility/Movie
theater
East
Planned Unit Development
(PUD) with General
Commercial (C-3)
Regional Commercial
Parking lot for the
Summit at
Rivery/Brownstones
West General Commercial (C-3) Regional Commercial Vacant
Aerial Image
Page 54 of 87
Planning Department Staff Report
Summit West | SUP-2017-007
Special Use Permit Page 3 of 6
Draft Concept Plan
Property History
The subject site was annexed into the City in 1986 (Ord. 86-51) as part of a larger tract. The
property was re-zoned from Residential Single-Family (RS) to its current zoning designation,
General Commercial (C-3), in 1996 (Ord. 96-45). The property is part of the Rivery Park 2 (BLK B
AMD) subdivision.
If approved, the proposed project would require the following applications:
Amending Plat to be approved by the P&Z commission (FP-2017-061)
Site Development Plan to be processed administratively
Building Permits for construction
2030 Comprehensive Plan
Future Land Use:
The 2030 Future Land Use category for the subject site is Regional Commercial.
The Regional Commercial category applies to large concentrations of commercial uses that serve or
draw a regional market, such as major shopping centers, stand-alone big-box retail, tourist
attractions and supporting accommodations, and automobile-oriented commercial uses that rely
on convenient access from major transportation routes and highway interchanges. Such
properties are often configured in a manner or located in areas that may not be suitable for the
introduction of mixed-uses.
Page 55 of 87
Planning Department Staff Report
Summit West | SUP-2017-007
Special Use Permit Page 4 of 6
Transportation
The subject site’s inbound and outbound access is on Rivery Blvd. Rivery Blvd also provides
direct access to Williams Drive and the IH-35 Southbound Frontage Road. Rivery Blvd is
identified as an existing minor arterial road; which is a roadway designed to connect lower
funcation classifications and major arterials and tend to be shorter in distance.
Utilities
The subject site is located within the City of Georgetown’s service area for water, wastewater and
electric. It is anticipated that there is adequate capacity to serve this property either by existing
capacity or developer participation in upgrades to infrastructure.
Zoning District
The General Commercial (C-3) zoning district is intended to provide a location for general
commercial and retail activities that serve the entire community and its visitors. Uses may be
large in scale and generate substantial traffic, making the C -3 district only appropriate along
freeways and major arterials. The C-3 district offers the most options of permitted land uses and
is the most intense land use apart from the Industrial (IN) district. Typical uses in this district
include general retail, hotels, restaurants, and general office.
Certain land uses require a Special Use Permit (SUP). The purpose for requiring an SUP is to
allow for City Council to review the location, design, and intensity of certain land uses on an
individual basis to determine if the specific use is appropriate at the proposed location.
Additionally, it provides the City Council the option to establish conditions for the use within the
zoning district to help mitigate and reduce the impact that the use may have on the adjacent
properties and vicinity.
Staff Analysis
Staff has reviewed the applicant’s request to establish multi-family residential units located at
1515 and 1531 Rivery Blvd at a density of 8.39 units per acre. The UDC, in Section 3.07.030.C,
states that the City Council may approve an application for an SUP where it reasonably
determines that there will be no significant negative impact upon residents of surrounding
property or upon the general public. The City Council shall consider the following criteria in its
review:
1. The proposed special use is not detrimental to the health, welfare, and safety of the
surrounding neighborhood or its occupants.
The proposed special use does not pose any threat to the health, welfare, and safety of the
surrounding neighborhoods or its occupants. The proposed multi-family use is compatible with
the surrounding existing and proposed uses that include multi-family, general retail, personal
services and entertainment. Furthermore, it will bring additional density to the area to further
Page 56 of 87
Planning Department Staff Report
Summit West | SUP-2017-007
Special Use Permit Page 5 of 6
support the non-residential uses of the Summit at Rivery development and other nearby non-
residential uses.
2. The proposed conceptual site layout, circulation plan, and design are harmonious with the
character of the surrounding area.
The proposed conceptual site layout, circulation, and design are harmonious with the character
of the surrounding area. According to the applicant, the Rivery development was planned as a
walkable and bike oriented [mixed-use] development. Across Rivery Blvd there are existing
three-story brownstone condos with trail access to the Rivery Park. The proposed condos
would only be two-story. Additionally, the conceptual site layout is sensitive to the nearby San
Gabriel River by providing ample open space and tree preservation to adjoin with the existing
open space near the river.
3. The proposed use does not negatively impact existing uses in the area and in the City
through impacts on public infrastructure such as roads, parking facilities, and water and
sewer systems and on public services such as police and fire protection and solid waste
collection and the ability of existing infrastructure and services to adequately provide
services.
The subject site includes an access easement along the southern property line to provide cross-
access to adjacent lots and provide additional access to Wolf Ranch Pkwy (and thus access to
SH 29/University), Rivery Blvd (and thus access to Williams Dr and IH-35). As part of the
approval process, the applicant is required to submit a Utility Evaluation for the proposed
development. Any public improvements that may be required to provide the necessary water
and wastewater utilities for the site will be the responsibility of the developer.
4. The proposed use does not negatively impact existing uses in the area and in the City
through the creation of noise, glare, fumes, dust, smoke, vibration, fire hazard or other
injurious or noxious impact.
The proposed multi-family development (to be known as Summit West) would not have any
negative impact on existing uses in the area. There would not be added noise, glare, smells, or
other injurious or noxious impacts. The proposed condos would be owner-occupied, which
would have a lower turnover rate (compared to renter-occupied units). Owner-occupied units
typically attract long-term residents who are invested in their neighborhood. The condos would
be developed near existing condos and would provide an increased customer base for the
existing non-residential uses.
General Findings
Based on all the information presented, staff has found that the requested SUP promotes the
Page 57 of 87
Planning Department Staff Report
Summit West | SUP-2017-007
Special Use Permit Page 6 of 6
following goals established in the Comprehensive Plan:
1.B – Promote more compact, higher density development (e.g., traditional neighborhoods,
Transit-Oriented Development, mixed-use, and walkable neighborhoods) within appropriate
infill locations.
1.E.3 – Promote mixed-use, pedestrian-friendly land use patterns, including community
activity centers, neighborhood activity centers, conservation subdivisions, and walkable
neighborhoods.
The Summit at Rivery Park is located across Rivery Blvd and provides many multi-family
residential options and retail providers. The development of Summit West would increase
housing choices, as well as create more walkable and bikeable opportunities for residents
consistent with the original intent of the Rivery development. In addition to the Summit at
Rivery Park - the City Lights Theatre, Sheraton Hotel, Rivery Park, and multiple restaurants and
offices uses are within walking and biking distance.
2C – Identify potential opportunities and selectively target, plan, and promote
development/reuse initiatives.
The development of Summit West enhances the existing development of the Rivery area. This
area has a large amount of private investment that has greatly benefit the City. It is important to
develop the remaining tracts in this area in a manner consistent with the existing development
type.
Public Comments
As required by the Unified Development Code, all property owners within a 200-foot radius of
the subject property that are located within City limits were notified of the SUP application (15
notices mailed), a legal notice advertising the public hearing was placed in the Sun Newspaper
(October 22, 2017) and signs were posted on-site. To date, staff has received no written
comments.
Attachments
Attachment 1 – Location Map
Attachment 2 – Future Land Use Map
Attachment 3 – Zoning Map
Attachment 4 – Letter of Intent
Attachment 5 – Conceptual Plan
Page 58 of 87
N IH 35
R
I
V
E
RY
BL
V
D
N AUSTIN AVE
S IH 35
S
M
A
I
N
S
T
§¨¦35
W
IL
LIA
M
S D
R
SUP-2017-007Exhibit #1
Coordi nate System : Texas State Plane/Centr al Zone/N AD 83/U S FeetCartographic Data For G eneral Plann ing Pu rpo ses Only
¯
Location Map LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
0 0.25 0.5Mi
Page 59 of 87
P
A
R
K L
N
S IH 35 SB
S IH 35 NB
RIVERY BLVD
R A N C H R D
W
IL
LIA
M
S D
R
P A R K W A Y S T
W O L F R D
COUN T R Y C L U B R D
S IH 35 FW Y SB
S IH 35 FW Y NB
P O W E R R D
WOLF RANCH PKWY
ENTR 261 NB
O
A
K L
N
EXIT 261 S B
N IH 35 SB
DUN M A N D R
JUDY D R
A
L
L
Y
S H A N NONLN
CLAY ST
HINTZ RD
M
E
S
Q
UIT
E L
N
A D A MS ST
RIVERY DRIVEWAY
RIDG
E
C
R
E
S
T
R
D
G
A
B
R
I
E
L
V
I
E
W
D
R
W
I
L
L
O
W
L
N
W
MORROW S T
A S H W OODLN
N IH 35 FWY SB
S P R I N G VALLEY
RD
PARK E R C I R
WJANISDR
C E D A R D R
W CENTR AL D R
C
O
T
T
O
N
W
O
O
D D
R
E JANIS DR
RIV E R SID E D R
N AUSTIN AVE
ENTR 262 NB
HARMON Y L N
WO O D L A WNAVE
M O R RIS D R
WILLIAMS D RTNNB
WSPRI N G S T
HIGHK N O LL
L
N
P
O
W
E
R
C
I
R
HERSHEY AVE
HAGEN CT
G
A
B
R
IE
L
VIE
W
D
R
Coor dinate System: Texas State Plane/Ce ntral Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic D ata For Gen eral Planni ng Purposes O nly
¯
Future Land Use / Overall Transportation Plan
Exhibit #2
SUP-2017 -007
Leg en d
Thoroughfare
Future Land Use
In stitutional
Re g ional Commercial
Co m munity Comm ercial
Employment Center
Lo w Density Residential
Mining
Mixe d Use Com munity
Mixe d Use Neighborhood Center
Mo derate Density Residential
Open Space
Spe cialty M ixed Use Area
Ag / Rural Residential
Existing Collector
Existing Freeway
Existing Major Arterial
Existing Minor Arterial
Existing Ramp
Pro p osed Collector
Pro p osed Freeway
Pro p sed Frontage Road
Pro p osed M ajor Arterial
Pro p osed M inor Arterial
Pro p osed Railroad
Hi gh Density Residential
Legend
Sit eParcelsCity L im itsGeorgetown ET J
0 500 1,000Fee t
Page 60 of 87
P
A
R
K L
N
S IH 35 SB
S IH 35 NB
RIVERY BLVD
R A N C H R D
W
IL
LIA
M
S D
R
P A R K W A Y S T
W O L F R D
COUN T R Y C L U B R D
S IH 35 FW Y SB
S IH 35 FW Y NB
P O W E R R D
WOLF RANCH PKWY
ENTR 261 NB
O
A
K L
N
EXIT 261 S B
N IH 35 SB
DUN M A N D R
JUDY D R
A
L
L
Y
S H A N NONLN
CLAY ST
HINTZ RD
M
E
S
Q
UIT
E L
N
A D A MS ST
RIVERY DRIVEWAY
RIDG
E
C
R
E
S
T
R
D
G
A
B
R
I
E
L
V
I
E
W
D
R
W
I
L
L
O
W
L
N
W
MORROW S T
A S H W OODLN
N IH 35 FWY SB
S P R I N G VALLEY
RD
PARK E R C I R
WJANISDR
C E D A R D R
W CENTR AL D R
C
O
T
T
O
N
W
O
O
D D
R
E JANIS DR
RIV E R SID E D R
N AUSTIN AVE
ENTR 262 NB
HARMON Y L N
WO O D L A WNAVE
M O R RIS D R
WILLIAMS D RTNNB
WSPRI N G S T
HIGHK N O LL
L
N
P
O
W
E
R
C
I
R
HERSHEY AVE
HAGEN CT
G
A
B
R
IE
L
VIE
W
D
R
Zoning InformationSUP-2017-007Exhibit #3
Co o rdi nate System : Texas State Plane/Central Zo ne/N A D 83/US FeetCartographic D ata For Gener al Plann ing Pu rposes Only
LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
¯
0 500 1,000Fee t
Page 61 of 87
RIVERY BLVDCOUNTRYCLUBRD
P A R K W A Y S T
W O L F R A N C H P K W Y
W
IL
LIA
M
S D
R
A
L
L
Y
RANCH R D
HINTZRD
ADAM S ST
W
I
L
L
O
W
L
N
O
A
K L
N
G
A
B
RIE
L VIE
W
D
R
S H A N N O N L N
S IH 35 SB
W O O D L A WNAVE
HIGHKNO L L L N
P
O
W
E
R
C
I
R
M O R RIS D R
HERS HEY AVE
C
O
T
T
O
N
W
O
O
D D
R
RIVERY BLVD
Co o rdi nate System : Texas State Plane/Central Zo ne/N A D 83/US FeetCartographic D ata For Gener al Plann ing Pu rposes Only
¯
Aeria l
SUP-2017-007 LegendSiteCity Limits
0 500 1,000Feet
Page 62 of 87
NOVAK BROTHERS
I.CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN
-ca __,. ( r '
This conceptual plan does not represent an actual site develop
ment plan and is subject to change. It is representative of the
housing type, density and general layout.
2.SITE AREA
10.6 Acres. Rivery Park II Amending Plat, Block B, Lots 3 and 4.
3.LIVING UNITS
Two and three-bedroom townhouse units in buildings ranging
from two to five units per building. Building type, location, unit
configuration, and fl oorplans subject to change.
181 Type A Building: 2-3 units
181 Type B Building: 2-4 units
181 Type C Building: 3-4 units
181 Type D Building: 3-5 units
SUMMIT WEST
4.DENSITY
89 total units maximum. 10.6 acres. 8.39 Units per Acre.
5.PARKING
Per UDC requirements. Each townhouse unit to contain garage
parking for two vehicles. Two-bedroom units require 2.0 spaces on
site. Three-bedroom units will provide 2.5 spaces on-site. In addition,
visitor parking will be included at an additional 5%, per the UDC.
Conceptual site plan depicts a maximum of 218 spaces, with 178 con
tained within secured, enclosed garages. Final number of parking
spaces subject to change depending on final unit count.
6.ACCESS
Primary access off of Rivery Boulevard from platted driveway. Sec
ondary emergency access provided through three driveways to City
Lights Theater and future access point to abutting property to the
west (per Rivery Park II amending plat).
!!! HALFF
7.LANDSCAPING, TRASH, FENCING, SETBACKS, AMENITIES
As required per the UDC.
8.TREES
Trees to be protected per Note #13 of Rivery Park II amending
plat.
9.IMPERVIOUS COVER
65% per Note #14 of Rivery Park II amending plat notes.
10.STORMWATER
Water quality proposed in sub-surface treatment facilities
beneath parking lot as depicted on conceptual site plan.
11.SPRING BUFFER
The location and size of the spring buffer may be altered if a
water quality variance is obtained or vesting determined.
Page 63 of 87
City of Georgetown, Texas
Planning and Zoning
November 7, 2017
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing and possible action on a reques t fo r a Special Use Permit to allo w a spec ial events
facility o n the p ro p erty loc ated at 511 S. Main S treet, lo cated near the inters ec tion of Main Street and E. 6th
Street in the Mixed-Us e Do wntown zo ning dis tric t (S UP -2017-008, Wis h Well Hous e). Nat Waggoner,
Long Range P lanning Manager
ITEM SUMMARY:
Background:
The ap p licant has reques ted cons id eration of a Spec ial Us e P ermit (SUP) that wo uld allo w an Event
Fac ility to be loc ated in the Mixed Us e Do wnto wn (MU-DT) d is tric t. The ap p lic ant p ro p o s es to provid e
ap p ro ximately 6,600 s quare feet of indoor s pac e and 3,000 square feet of outdoor s p ace to b e us ed for
events s uc h as wedding ceremonies and rec eptio ns , rehears al dinners, c o rporate func tions , b irthd ay
p arties, and reunio ns .
Public Co mments:
A to tal o f 23 no tic es were sent o ut to the o wners o f property within 200 feet o f the s ubjec t p ro p erty. Public
notice was pos ted in the Sun news p ap er on O c to b er 22, 2017. As o f the date of this report, the City
received one (1) written c o mment in favo r with res ervatio ns and o ne (1) in oppos itio n o f the req uest, as
well as one (1) general inq uiry.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None. The applic ant has paid all applic ation fees .
SUBMITTED BY:
Nathaniel Waggo ner, AICP, PMP, Long Range P lanning Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
SUP-2017-008 Staff Report Backup Material
Exhibit 1 - Location Map Exhibit
Exhibit 2 - Future Land Us e Map Exhibit
Exhibit 3 – Zoning Map Exhibit
Exhibit 4 – Aerial Map Exhibit
Exhibit 5 – MU DT Dis trict Development Standards and Permitted
Land Us e
Exhibit
Exhibit 6 – Applicant’s Letter of Intent Exhibit
Exhibit 7 – Conceptual Site Plan Exhibit
Exhibit 8 – Public Comment Received Exhibit
Page 64 of 87
Georgetown Planning Department Staff Report
Wish Well – SUP-2017-008 Page 1 of 13
Report Date: November 3, 2017
File No.: SUP-2017-008
Project Planner: Nat Waggoner, AICP, Long Range Planning Manager
Item Details
Project Name: Wish Well
Project Address: 511 S. Main St.
Location: Northeast Corner of Main Streets and 6th and
Total Acreage: 0.33 acres
Legal Description: Glasscock Addition, Block 26, Lots 5-6
Applicant: Compostella Development
Property Owner: William Bryce
Contact: Scott Stribling
Existing Use: Office (Commercial)
Existing Zoning: MU-DT, Mixed Use Downtown / Downtown Overlay District
Overview of Applicant’s Request
The applicant has requested consideration of a Special Use Permit (SUP) that would allow
an Event Facility to be locate in the Mixed Use Downtown (MU-DT) district. The Event
Facility land use category was initially defined via the “Director’s Determination of an
Unlisted Use” process and adopted in the Unified Development Code (UDC) in 2015 by
Ordinance 2015-049 (see Previous Event Facility Special Use Permit section for more
information).
Proposed Use Details:
The applicant proposes to provide approximately 6,600 square feet of indoor space
and 3,000 square feet of outdoor space to be used for events such as wedding
ceremonies and receptions, rehearsal dinners, corporate functions, birthday parties,
and reunions. Please refer to Exhibit 6, applicant’s Letter of Intent, and Exhibit 7,
Conceptual Site Plan, for more information.
Proposed Site Design:
As shown on their Conceptual Site Plan, the applicant proposes to utilize the existing 4,100
square foot building and proposes the following modifications to the site, (1) a 3,056 sq. ft.
outdoor seating area and (2) a 2,600 sq. ft. addition to the east side of the existing building.
Page 65 of 87
Planning Department Staff Report
Wish Well – SUP-2017-008 Page 2 of 13
(1) The new 3,056 square foot courtyard area will be constructed adjacent to the
north wall of the building and abut Main Street. A standard 6 foot high
masonry perimeter wall will be installed around the new courtyard area. A
metal entry gate will be installed on the Main Street side of the perimeter
wall for emergency and ADA purposes. One large tree (size unknown at the
time of report), one of three on the site, will be preserved in the courtyard
area.
(2) The proposed 2,600 square foot addition is composed of the following:
a. 285 sq. ft. storage area
b. 324 sq. ft. warming kitchen
c. 164 sq. ft. stair
d. 252 sq. ft. hallway
e. 244 sq. ft. sanitary facilities
f. 1,374 sq. ft. cocktail area
The applicant is also proposing to construct thirteen (13) new on-street parking spaces; four
(4) located within the Main Street right-of-way and nine (9) located within the 6th Street
right-of-way.
Background
Property History:
According to the City’s 2016 Historic Resources Survey, this property was constructed in
1922. Historic Surveys completed in 1984, 2007 and 2016 rated the resources as a high
priority. Structures identifed as High Prioriy Contribute significantly to local
history/broader historical patterns, are good examples of architecture, engineering, or
crafted design and retain a high degree of integrity. This property is am excellent example
of a Center Passage plan house with a sufficient degree of integrity.
Zoning History:
The site was originally assigned a C2-A (commercial) zoning designation. With the
adoption of the UDC in 2003, any C2-A districts in the Downtown Overlay were converted
to C-2, Downtown Commercial zoning. The name of the C-2 district was later changed to
MU-DT, Mixed Use Downtown along with use standards and land uses.
Historic and Architectural Review Commission (HARC) Review:
The applicant intends to submit the proposed alterations and additions for HARC
Page 66 of 87
Planning Department Staff Report
Wish Well – SUP-2017-008 Page 3 of 13
consideration following Special Use Permit approval.
Site Information
Location:
The site is located at the northeast corner of South Main Street and 6th Street. The property
falls just within the eastern edge of the Downtown Overlay District and is one block north
of the courthouse square.
Physical Characteristics:
The lot measures approximately 120-feet by 80-feet and is approximately one third of an
acre. The existing building sits approximately six (6) feet from the south property line and
17 feet from the west property line. Approximately one third of the property appears to be
covered by the primary building. The property also includes two small outbuildings in the
northeast corner of the property (dimensions were not available at the time of this report).
The property is flat with three (3) trees located on the southwest and northern portions of
the site. The northern portion of the property is generally undeveloped.
Existing Conditions:
The property is currently serving as a professional office (non-residential use). According to
records from Williamson County Appraisal District the property appears to be in the
original configuration however a carport and open porch have been added to the original
structure.
Surrounding Properties:
See Exhibit 3 – Current Zoning Map and Exhibit 4 - Future Land Use Designation.
North:
The property directly adjacent and to the north to the site is zoned Office (OF) and
the use is professional office. The Future Land Use Map designation is Specialty
Mixed-Use.
South:
The properties directly across 6th Street and to the south of the subject property are
currently zoned Mixed-Use-Downtown (MU-DT) and the use is surface parking that
serves the adjacent Municipal Court and City Council Chambers. The Future Land Use
Map designation is Specialty Mixed-Use.
East:
The property directly adjacent and to the east of the subject project is zoned Residential
Single-Family (RS) and the use is residential. The other properties along Church are
Page 67 of 87
Planning Department Staff Report
Wish Well – SUP-2017-008 Page 4 of 13
also zoned RS and identified as Moderate Density Residential in the Future Land Use
Map.
West:
The property directly across Main Street and to the west of the subject property is
zoned Mixed-Use-Downtown (MU-DT) and the use is professional office, retail and
restaurant. The Future Land Use Map designation is Specialty Mixed-Use.
Utilities:
Water, wastewater, and electric are currently served by the City of Georgetown. Additional
utility capacities will be evaluated during Site Plan review process.
Transportation:
The property is served by one (1) unimproved driveway, approxiamtely 10 ft. wide by 40
ft. long, which provides an informal area for one (1) on-site parking space. According to
the City’s adopted thoroughfare plan, Main Street is classified as a Collector roadway with
a speed limit of 30 mph. 6th Street is classified as Local Street with a speed limit of 30 mph.
The property is served with sidewalks along both Main and 6th Streets. In the Downtown
Master Plan, Main Street is identified as a priority corridor for both bikes and pedestrians,
however the roadway is not striped nor signed for bike use. Adjacent to the property,
parking is permitted along the eastern side of Main Street and the western side of the
roadway includes eight (8) head in spaces. 6th Street also permits parallel parking along the
curb. The property is within 500 ft. of fixed route bus service.
2030 Plan
Future Land Use Plan:
This property is designated as a Specialty Mixed-Use Area on the Future Land Use Map,
due to its location within the Downtown Overlay District.
This category also applies to downtown Georgetown, reflecting its role as a regional
desitination for services, cultural, and civic function. This emphasizes the urban character
and the mix and intensity of uses uniquely suited to this center of activity. The designation
is intended to permit a true mix of uses, with unique development standards tailored to the
character of the area, such as the downtown area. As promoted by the Downtown Master
Plan, the intent is to move the downtown area towards becoming a center of activity not only
in the day, but also at night and on weekends, by promoting a mix of commercial,
entertainment, residential, and civic uses.
Vision Statements:
The 2030 Plan Vision Statements identify what the community wants to be 20 years in the
future. The Plan indicates in downtown Georgetown and older neighborhoods, home-
Page 68 of 87
Planning Department Staff Report
Wish Well – SUP-2017-008 Page 5 of 13
grown businesses should be supported and a mix of businesses, services, retail and
entertainment uses suited to the scale and historic charm of downtown should be planned
for. Additionally, the Plan indicates the City should attract or create “an array of civic, arts
and other cultural activities and events to expand the level of downtown activity”.
Goals, Policies, and Actions:
Goal 2 Promote sound investment in Georgetown’s older developed areas, including
downtown, aging commercial and industrial areas, in-town neighborhoods, and
other areas expected to experience land use change or obsolescence.
2.A. Remove present inadvertent impediments to infill and re-investment in
older, developed areas.
2.C. Identify potential opportunities and selectively target, plan, and promote
development/re-use initiatives.
2.D. Continue to promote diversification and strengthening of downtown
Georgetown and its in-town historic neighborhoods.
These policies situate the City in a more proactive stance to promote its vision of
downtown – one in which new development and re-investment are actively
pursued to strenghten and diversify the land use and activity mix of downtown.
The City will continue to be supportive of, and responsive to private initiatives
through incentives, public parking, and capital improvements. In addition, these
policies call for the City to develop its own “action agenda” for downtown,
including the identification of redevelopment areas and plans for area-wide
improvments to streets, parking, and urban design amenities.
Growth Tier Map:
The 2030 Plan Growth Tier Map identifies the downtown area designation as Tier 1A,
which is the portion of the City where infrastructure systems are in place, or can be
economically provided, and where the bulk of the City’s growth should be guided over the
near term.
Downtown Master Plan
The Downtown Master Plan encourages the “intensive use of land and structures … along
with public parking and pedestrian-friendly design, to provide an active live/work
environment”. The Plan suggests the intensity of uses outside the square, in outlying areas,
should be built up. Based on the community’s need for space for performance art and
conferences, the Plan sees opportunity for cultural uses, including additional arts spaces
and meeting facilities.
Page 69 of 87
Planning Department Staff Report
Wish Well – SUP-2017-008 Page 6 of 13
The Plan directs the City to “frame the pedestrian-oriented core with four anchors of
activity that will attract pedestrian circulation beyond the traditional retail center. Along
the eastern edge, a collection of churches serves as an informal anchor; to the west,
government facilities, the south, retail/convienent commercial, office and banking amd to
the north restaurants and recreation. Development downtown should be organized around
a series of “activity centers” - including outlying blocks around the courthouse – and
providing community focal points or “mini-destinations” such as the Tamiro Plaza across
the street and the Monument Café one block west. Opportunities exist for “redevelopment
designed to strenghthen the downtown area … accomplished by increasing the level of
commercial activities, creating a stronger sense of excitement and ambience and identity
within the downtown, providing new land uses downtown. Each activity center should
include uses that will attract people to downtown and encourage pedestrian activity.”
The property is located within the Downtown Core Character Area, and as defined by the
Downtown Master Plan, this area retains the best definition of a retail-oriented street edge
surrounding the Town Square Historic District. It has a collection of historic buildings that
provide interest and is served by on-street parking, for the most part. The existing
streetscape amenities consist of brick pavers, benches, decorative lights and period street
signs. Development recommendations included in the Master Plan for this area include
specialty shopping and dining destination for the county. According to the Plan, the area
should be entertaining and highlight the unique qualities of a downtown shopping
experience. It should include shops, restaurants and specialty stores. Office space and
apartments on upper floors should be promoted that will help energize this area and
support the street level businesses. Existing historic assets should be preserved whenever
feasible, and be adapted to a new use. A key recommendation of the development plan for
the Dowtown Core Character Area, as noted in the Master Plan, includes the promotion of
more cultural facilities and entertainment venues.
Mixed Use Downtown (MU-DT) Zoning District
Purpose Statement:
The Mixed Use Downtown District (MU-DT) is intended to provide a location for a mix of land
uses including general commercial and retail activities, and office, as well as single-family and
multifamily in the downtown area. Developments in the MU-DT district are typically smaller in
size and scope, although there may be occasionally heavy traffic. The MU-DT district is only
appropriate in the traditional downtown area of Georgetown. Properties in MU-DT shall meet the
design requirements of the Downtown Overlay District and Downtown Design Guidelines.
Permitted Land Uses:
See Exhibit 5 – MU DT District Development Standards and Permitted Land Use
Page 70 of 87
Planning Department Staff Report
Wish Well – SUP-2017-008 Page 7 of 13
The MU-DT district permits a range of land uses by right including single-family
residences, governmental offices, libraries, museums, inns, restaurants, caterers, artisan’s
studios and galleries, and a wide range of personal services.
Some uses are permitted by right within the district subject to certain listed limitations,
including churches, bed and breakfasts, bed and breakfasts with events, micro breweries,
wineries, live music or entertainment, general office, and general retail.
Other uses may be allowed through approval of a Special Use Permit by City Council
including ground floor residential, hotels, drive through restaurants, membership clubs,
night clubs. A full list of uses allowed by right, limited or those that require approval by
City Council are included in Exhibit 5 MU DT District Development Standards and Permitted
Land Use.
Table 5.04.010 Commercial Uses
Specific Use AG
RE
RS
RL
TF
TH
MF
MH
CN
C1
C3
OF
BP
IN
PF
MU
D
T
MU
No
t
e
s
Entertainment and
Recreation
Event Facility S -- -- -- -- -- -- -- S S L -- -- -- L S * W
*See Section 4.11
5.04.010 Commercial Use Limitations
W. Event Facility
An event facility is permitted in accordance with the Use Table in 5.04.010 and subject to the
following standards and limitations:
1. A Special Use Permit is required in the C-3 and PF Districts for Event Facilities designed to
host events with more than 300 attendees. A Special Use Permit is required in the AG, CN,
C-1 and MUDT Districts for all Event Facilities.
2. Any outdoor live music or entertainment area shall be shown on a Site Plan and shall be set
back a minimum of 50 feet from the property line of residentially zoned property.
3. Any live music or entertainment in association with an event is subject to the provisions of
Chapter 8.16 “Noise” of the Georgetown Municipal Code.
Section 9.02.030. A
Use Category Specific Use General Requirement
Commercial Uses
Food and Beverage
Establishments
All Restaurants/Bar/Brewery/
Winery
1 per 100 sq ft of designated seating area/
entertainment area + 4 additional spaces
Food Catering Services 1 per 400 sq ft GFA
Entertainment and
Recreation
Theaters and Stadiums 1 per 250 sq ft GFA + 1 additional per 500 sq ft GFA
up to 50,000 sq ft GFA
All other Entertainment and
Recreation
1 per 400 sq ft GFA + 1 additional per 4 capacity
seating
Page 71 of 87
Planning Department Staff Report
Wish Well – SUP-2017-008 Page 8 of 13
Use Category Specific Use General Requirement
Major Utilities 1 per 500 sq ft GFA - minimum of 2
Downtown Overlay District
Downtown Overlay
District
Retail buildings greater than
20,000 square feet in Area 1 1 per 1,500 sq ft GFA
All other uses in Area 1 No off-street parking requirement
Residential Uses in Area 2 See the Household Living parking
requirements of this table
Non-Residential Uses in Area 2† 1 per 500 sq ft GFA
Section 16.02 Definitions
Event Facility. A building, structure, or site available for rental by the public for the primary intended purpose
of hosting parties, wedding receptions, banquets, corporate meetings or similar group events. Event Facility
does not include an event room available for rental in a structure housing another primary use where the event
room rental is an accessory use to the primary use (i.e., General Restaurant) or a Community Center as it is
defined in this Code.
Downtown Overlay District
Purpose Statement:
The Downtown Overlay District (D) is intended to protect the aesthetic and visual character of the
Town Square and downtown Georgetown through the establishment of two distinct zones,
designated as Area 1 and Area 2. All development within the Downtown Overlay District, except
ordinary maintenance and repair, shall be reviewed in accordance with the adopted Design
Guidelines by the Historic and Architectural Review Commission (HARC), which shall review the
location, character, and appearance of proposed development, renovation, or redevelopment activity.
Adopted in 2001, The Downtown Overlay District defines an area in which design guidelines apply
for many types of improvements. In terms of permitted land uses, the boundary is the same as that of
what has been designated as the Downtown Pedestrian Mixed Use zone in the Future Land Use
Plan of the city’s Century Plan. This boundary is used for the Downtown Master Plan because it
includes all of the properties that have the potential to redevelop with a mix of uses, including a
variety of commercial uses, as well as residential. The planning area is framed by established
neighborhoods, which the comprehensive plan envisions remaining stable residential places.
Special Use Permits
Applicability:
Special Use Permits allow for City Council approval of uses with unique or widely varying
operating characteristics or unusual site development features, subject to the terms and conditions
set forth in the UDC. Special Use Permits may be issued only for uses that are generally compatible
with other uses permitted in a zoning district, but that require individual review of their location,
Page 72 of 87
Planning Department Staff Report
Wish Well – SUP-2017-008 Page 9 of 13
design, intensity, etc. These uses may be located in districts as indicated with conditions described in
the Special Use Permit recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission and approved by the
City Council.
Approval Criteria:
When considering a request for a Special Use Permit, Commission and City Council tasked
with “reasonably determining that there will be no significant negative impact upon
residents of surrounding property or upon the general public”. The following criteria shall
be considered:
1. The proposed use is not detrimental to the health, welfare, and safety of the
surrounding neighborhood or its occupants.
2. The proposed conceptual site layout, circulation plan, and design are harmonious
with the character of the surrounding area.
3. The proposed use does not negatively impact existing uses in the area and in the
City through impacts on public infrastructure such as roads, parking facilities and
water and sewer systems, and on public services such as police and fire protection
and solid waste collection, and the ability of existing infrastructure and services to
adequately provide services.
4. The proposed use does not negatively impact existing uses in the area and in the
City through the creation of noise, glare, fumes, dust, smoke, vibration, fire hazard,
or other injurious or noxious impact.
Special Use Permits convey with the property, and not the property owner, renter, or
lessee. City Council may impose any additional conditions or limitations deemed
appropriate for the requested use.
Code of Ordinances – Noise Control
Chapter 8.16 of the City of Georgetown Code of Ordinances restricts noise generated on
commercial properties to a maximum of 70 decibels during the daytime (between 7 a.m.
and 10 p.m.) and 63 decibels during the nighttime (10 p.m. to 7 a.m.). Measurements of
noise emanating from private property shall be taken from a point beyond the real
property line of the property from which the noise is being generated.
Previous Event Facility Special Use Permits in the MUDT:
In February 2013, an application was submitted to the City for the consideration of a
Special Use Permit (SUP) that would allow an Event Facility to locate in the Mixed Use
Downtown (MU-DT) district at 224 E. 8th Street. The application required the
Page 73 of 87
Planning Department Staff Report
Wish Well – SUP-2017-008 Page 10 of 13
acknowledgement and definition as a Land Use category via a “Director’s Determination of
an Unlisted Use” process.
The Director determined the “event space” use did not fit within any of the existing
uses listed in Chapter 5 – Zoning Use Regulations and therefore required the new use
category of “Event Facility” be established. Specifically, the Director determined an Event
Facility in the MU-DT district required approval of an SUP. Additionally, limitations were
included, applicable to all Event Facilities across all zoning districts. The Zoning Board of
Adjustment upheld the Director’s determination through the consideration of an appeal on
January 23, 2013.
Through the development review and approval process, City staff supported and Council
approved the requested SUP for an Event Facility with the following conditions:
1. Events to be limited to a maximum of 225 guests;
2. Events to start no earlier than 9:00 a.m., and shall end by 10:00 p.m. Sunday through
Thursday and by 11:00 p.m. on Fridays and Saturdays;
3. Music and entertainment to discontinue by 9:45 p.m. Sunday through Thursdays
and by 10:45 p.m. on Fridays and Saturdays;
4. Alcoholic beverages not be served after 9:30 p.m. Sunday through Thursday and
10:30 p.m. on Fridays and Saturdays;
5. Any amplification, speaker or music source required to be located entirely within
the building;
6. A facility representative was required to be present on-site during all events;
7. A minimum of one security officer required at any event exceeding 50 guests, with
two required at events exceeding 100 guests;
8. Events serving alcohol required a state-licensed and certified bartender;
9. No direct retail sales of alcohol to the general public was permitted;
10. Primary entry to the building was directed to be on the north side of the property
for guests, vendors, and office usage;
11. Parking related to the event or office usage was prohibited on Myrtle Street and the
adjacent residential area;
12. The applicant was required to acquire a shared parking agreement, as outlined in
the UDC, to address the parking demands of larger events prior to issuance of the
Certificate of Occupancy.
Page 74 of 87
Planning Department Staff Report
Wish Well – SUP-2017-008 Page 11 of 13
Inter Departmental, Governmental and Agency Comments
None.
Staff Analysis
Staff has reviewed this application with regard to the 2030 Plan, the Downtown Master
Plan, and the provisions of the UDC and finds the following:
The 2030 Plan emphasizes the desire for the downtown area to be a destination and activity
area not only during the day, but at night and on the weekends as well. To accomplish this,
the Plan directs the City to support a mix of services, retail, entertainment venues suited to
the scale and charm of downtown and to promote re-use and re-investment in older
developed areas to strengthen and diversify both downtown and the historic
neighborhoods.
• Staff finds that the proposed plan meets the desire of the 2030 Plan as it proposes re-
use of an existing commercial site in the downtown area, helps to diversify the types
of uses available downtown, and will be a destination providing activity in the
evenings and on weekends too.
The Downtown Master Plan encourages activity centers and indicates the intensity of uses
in outlying areas outside the square should be built up to attract pedestrian circulation
beyond the traditional retail center. The Plan supports activities that will attract people to
downtown and help to create a stronger sense of excitement, ambience, and identity. As
part of the Downtown Core Character Area, the Master Plan suggests that the City should
promote development of more cultural facilities and entertainment venues.
• The proposed project is supported by the Downtown Master Plan’s goal of
attracting people downtown, beyond the square, and providing office space as well
as an additional cultural facility.
The MU-DT district is designed to provide a mix of uses, including those uses that operate
later hours, can generate vehicular traffic and provide amplified sound associated with live
music. Some of these uses include restaurants, places of worship (churches), bed and
breakfast (B&B), microbreweries, wineries and event facilities.
• Each of these uses are generally subject to limitations or restrictions that are
intended to mitigate negative impacts. However, when considering a request for a
Special Use Permit, Commission and City Council may consider previous conditions
placed upon similar Event Facilities to ensure “that there will be no significant
negative impact upon residents of surrounding property or upon the general
public”.
Page 75 of 87
Planning Department Staff Report
Wish Well – SUP-2017-008 Page 12 of 13
UDC Approval Criteria Review
1. The criteria state the proposed use cannot be detrimental to the health, welfare, and
safety of the surrounding neighborhood or its occupants.
• The proposed Event Facility will operate similarly to events that are permitted at a
B&B without any additional public review. The Commission and Council should
consider all aspects of operation for the proposed use when deciding on the request,
including the maximum guest count of 350 people.
2. The criteria also state the proposed conceptual site layout, circulation plan, and design
are harmonious with the character of the surrounding area.
• The applicant has taken the surrounding residents into consideration with the
design of the site. An existing historic building that has been in place since 1922 will
remain and be re-used. The outdoor courtyard area has been located furthest away
from the residential areas to the western most portion of the property. The applicant
is proposing a wall that could be designed to be pedestrian friendly and provide
screening and noise control.
3. The criteria require that the use not negatively impact public infrastructure, or public
services.
• The Commission and Council should consider the Event Facility’s ability to meet the
noise ordinance outside of the UDC’s required screening for aesthetics and privacy.
The applicant has not proposed any additional plan for the accommodation of guest
parking outside of the thirteen (13) new parking spaces within the right-of-way. The
Commission and Council should consider the overall impact that up to 350 guest
will cause to vehicular circulation and parking within public right of way, including
nearby City parking lots. While there is ample public parking available in the area,
the Commission and Council may consider measures to ensure the parking
demands of larger events can be met while ensuring that access and parking for
other uses and the general public are protected.
4. Finally, the criteria require that the proposed use not negatively impact existing uses in
the area and in the City through the creation of noise, glare, fumes, dust, smoke,
vibration, fire hazard, or other injurious or noxious impact.
• The applicant has proposed a location and approximate dimensions of a screening
wall and landscaping above what is required and that is designed to mitigate
impacts associated with the proposed use.
Staff finds that the proposed project supports the Downtown Master Plan’s goal of
attracting people downtown, beyond the square, and providing office space as well as an
additional cultural facility. Staff finds that the UDC approval critera, 1, 2 and 4 have
Page 76 of 87
Planning Department Staff Report
Wish Well – SUP-2017-008 Page 13 of 13
generally been met and recommends that the Commission and Council consider additional
measures to ensure that the use does not negatively impact public infrastructure, or public
services (Criteria #3), specifically parking, hours of operation and noise control.
Commission and Council Options:
1. Approve
2. Approve with Conditions
3. Deny
Public Comments
A total of 23 notices were sent out to the owners of property within 200 feet of the subject
property. Public notice was posted in the Sun newspaper on October 22, 2017. As of the
date of this report, the City received one (1) written comment in favor with reservations
and one (1) in opposition of the request, as well as one (1) general inquiry.
Meetings Schedule
November 7, 2017 – Planning and Zoning Commission
November 28, 2017 – City Council 1st Reading (pending)
December 12, 2017 – City Council 2nd Reading (pending)
Attachments
Exhibit 1 – Location Map
Exhibit 2 – Future Land Use Map
Exhibit 3 – Zoning Map
Exhibit 4 – Aerial Map
Exhibit 5 – MU DT District Development Standards and Permitted Land Use
Exhibit 6 – Applicant’s Letter of Intent
Exhibit 7 – Conceptual Site Plan
Exhibit 8 – Public Comment Received
Page 77 of 87
EL
M
ST
E 7 TH ST
R
O
C
K
S
T
A
SH
ST
S
M
A
I
N
S
T
SCENIC DR
E 5 TH ST
E 8 T H S T
E 4 TH ST
E 2 N D S T
WE
S
T
S
T E 6 TH ST
S
A
U
S
TI
N
AV
E
PIN
E
ST
W 8 T H S T
S
M
Y
R
T
L
E
S
T
W 1 0 T H S T
S C
HURCH S
T
S
C
O
L
L
E
G
E
S
T
M
A
P
L
E
S
T
H
O
LLY
ST
E 3 R D S T
W 6T H S T
W 4T H S T
W 11 T H S T
E U N I V ERS I T Y AV E
W U N IV E R SI TY AV E WA
L
N
U
T
S
T
FO
R
E
S
T
S
T
W 7T H S T
W 3RD S T
E 1 0T H S T
E 1 1 T H S T
MA
R
T
I
N
L
U
TH
E
R KI
N
G JR
S
T
S IH 35 NB
W 5 T H S T
B
R
I
D
GE
S
T
N
C
OL
LE
G
E
S
T
W 9T H S T
S IH 35 FWY NB
W ESLEY
A
N
D
R
RAILROAD AVE
BLUE HOLE PARK RD
W 2 N D S T
N
A
U
S
T
I
N
AV
E
E 9 T H S T
R
U
C
K
E
R
S
T
O
L
I
V
E
S
T
S OUL E D R
WAT E R S E D GE
C
I
R
E 9 TH 1 /2 S T M C K E N Z IE DR
T
I
N
B
A
R
N
A
LY
SANGABRIELVI L L A G E B L V D
MONT
GOMERY
ST
WA
L
N
U
T
S
T
E 9 TH ST
PIN
E
ST
E 3 R D S T
W 9 T H S T
E 1 0T H S T
H
O
L
L
Y
S
T
W 2N D S T
E 9 T H S T
SUP-2017-008Exhibit #1
Coordi nate System : Texas State Plane/Centr al Zone/N AD 83/U S FeetCartographic Data For G eneral Plann ing Pu rpo ses Only
¯
Location Map LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
0 500 1,000Feet
Page 78 of 87
EL
M
ST
R
O
C
K
S
T
S
M
A
IN
S
T
E 4 TH ST
E 5 TH ST
E 6 TH ST
E 7 TH ST
E 8 TH ST
A
SH
ST
S
M
Y
R
T
L
E
S
T
W 8T H S T
W 7T H S T
W 6 T H S T
S C
H
U
R
C
H
ST
W 4T H S T
S
A
U
S
T
I
N
AV
E
W 3R D ST
FOR
E
S
T
S
T
E 3 R D S T
W 5 T H S T
MA
R
T
I
N
L
U
T
H
E
R
K
I
N
G
J
R
S
T
Coord inate System: Texas Sta te Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Plan ning Pu rposes Only
¯
Future Land Use / Over all Transportation Plan
Exhibit #2
SUP -201 7-008
Leg en d
Thoroughfare
Future Land Use
Institutional
Regional Com mercial
Com munity Commercial
Emp loym ent Center
Low Density Residential
Min ing
Mixed Use Comm unity
Mixed Use Neighborhood Center
Mode rate Density Residential
Op en Space
Specialty Mixed Use Area
Ag / Rural Residential
Existing Collector
Existing F reeway
Existing Major Arterial
Existing Minor Arterial
Existing Ramp
Pro p osed Collector
Pro p osed Freeway
Pro p sed Frontage Road
Pro p osed M ajor Arterial
Pro p osed M inor Arterial
Pro p osed Railroad
Hig h Density Residential
Legend
Sit eParce lsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
0 250 500Ft
Page 79 of 87
ELM
ST
R
O
C
K
S
T
S
M
A
I
N
S
T
E 4 TH ST
E 5 TH ST
E 6 TH ST
E 7 TH ST
E 8 TH ST
A
SH
ST
S
M
Y
R
T
L
E
S
T
W 8T H S T
W 6 T H S T
W 7T H S T
S C
H
U
R
C
H
ST
W 4 T H S T
S
A
U
S
T
I
N
AV
E
W 3RD S T
FOR
E
S
T
S
T
E 3 R D S T
W 5 T H S T
MA
R
T
I
N
L
U
T
H
E
R
K
I
N
G
J
R
S
T
Zoning InformationSUP-2017-008Exhibit #3
Co o rdi nate System : Texas State Plane/Central Zo ne/N A D 83/US FeetCartographic D ata For Gener al Plann ing Pu rposes Only
LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
¯
0 250 500FtPage 80 of 87
ELM
ST
R
O
C
K
S
T
S
M
A
I
N
S
T
E 4 T H S T
E 5 T H S T
E 6 T H S T
E 7 T H S T
S
M
Y
R
T
L
E
S
T
S
CHURCH
ST
W 7 T H S T
S A
U
STIN
AVE
W 6 T H S T
W 4 T H S T
W 5 T H S T
Coordi nate System : Texas State Plane/Centr al Zone/N AD 83/U S FeetCartographic Data For G eneral Plann ing Pu rpo ses Only
¯
Aeria l
SUP-2017-008 LegendSiteCity Limits
0 250 500Feet
Page 81 of 87
Maximum Density = NA Front Setback = 0 feet Bufferyard = 10 feet with plantings
Maximum Building Height = 40 feet Side Setback = 0 feet adjacent to AG, RE, RL, RS,TF, or MH
Maximum Units per Building = NA Side Setback to Residential = 0 feet districts
Rear Setback = 0 feet adjacent to residences in AG
Rear Setback to Residential = 0 feet
Allowed by Right Subject to Limitations Special Use Permit (SUP) Required
Inn Bed and Breakfast Hotel (boutique)
Restaurant, General Bed and Breakfast (with events)Hotel (Full service)
Food Catering Services Microbrewery or Microwinery Restaurant (drive thru)
Home Health Care Services Live Music or Entertainment Bar, Tavern or Pub
Medical or Dental Office General Office Theater (Movie or live)
Farmers Market Integrated Office Center Mebership (Club or Lodge)
Arisan Studio/Gallery General Retail Event Facility
Personal Services Upper story residential Commercial Recreation
Dry Cleaning Service (drop off only)Home based business Blld or Plasma Center
Laundromat Daycare (family home)Diagnostic Center
Printing, Mailing, Reproduction Services Daycare (goup)Medical or Dental Clinic
Banking and Financial Services Religious assembly facilities Medical Complex
Consumer Repair Religious assembly facilities (with columbaria)Post Surgical Recovery Center
Vet Clinic (Indoor pens only)Public Park (neighborhood)Surgey Center
Single Family Detached Heliport Urgent Care Facility
Group Home (6 residents or less)Utility Services Intermediate Personal Services (restricted)
Emergency Services Station Wireless Transmission Facility (40 ft or less)Fitness Center
Government or Postal Office Townhouse
Library or Museum Multi-family attached dwelling units
Neature Preserve or Community Garden Accessory dwelling unit
Parking Lot (offsite)Group Home (7-15 residents)
Parking Lot (commercial)Assisted Living
Park and Ride Facility Hospice
Transit Passenger Terminal Rooming or Boarding House
Utillity Services (Minor)School, College or University
School, Business or Trade
Activity Center (Youth or Senior)
Community Center
Correctional Facility
Social Service Facility
Transient Service Facility
Hospital
Hospital, Psychiatric
Private Transport Service Dispatch Facility
Mixed Use Downtown (MU-DT) District
District Development Standards
Specific Uses Allowed within the District
Page 82 of 87
September 14, 2017
City of Georgetown Planning Department
406 West 8th Street
Georgetown, Texas
78626
Please accept this letter of intent to obtain a Special Use Permit for Event Center for
511 S Main Street, in Georgetown, TX. It is currently zoned MUDT and as such,
requires a special use permit for the site.
The intended business operation will be an event center with hours of operation of
daily from 7:00am until 12:00pm.
The subject property is listed as area 2 in the MUDT category and will comply with
all parking requirements for MUDT Area 2. Additionally, the design will be subject to
HARC review. The intent is not to change the front facade at all. There will be an
addition to the rear of the structure which will be shorter in height than the historic
structure, so as to not take away from the historic structure. Building dimensions
are detailed on the attached Conceptual Site Plan.
Estimated number of staff would be up to 3 at a time. The max occupancy will be
350 guests per event.
The subject property is listed as MUDT in the Future Land Use, and currently
borders commercial lots on 3 sides and 1 residential lot to the rear.
Roads and utilities are located either on site or on the perimeter, not needing any
special attention or approval out of the ordinary site plan process.
Thank you for your consideration and time.
Sincerely,
Scott Stribling
Compostela Development
511 S. Main St.
Georgetown, Texas
78626
LETTER OF INTENT TO OBTAIN SPECIAL USE PERMIT
Page 83 of 87
Page 84 of 87
Exhibit 8 – Public Comment Received
Page 85 of 87
Exhibit 8 – Public Comment Received
Page 86 of 87
City of Georgetown, Texas
Planning and Zoning
November 7, 2017
SUBJECT:
Presentation on a req uest to rezone ap p roximately 498.49 acres to Planned Unit Development (PUD)
with b as e zoning o f General Co mmercial C-3, Lo w Dens ity Multifamily (MF-1), Townho me (TH), Two -
Family (TF) and Res idential Single-Family (R S). (R EZ-2017-010 Highland Village, REZ-2017-012
Somerset Hills ) Chris Yanez, As s is tant Planning Directo r
ITEM SUMMARY:
Background:
The ap p licant has reques ted voluntary annexation and rezoning of ap p ro ximately 500 ac res to P lanned Unit
Develo p ment (PUD) with b as e zoning of General C o mmercial C-3, Low Dens ity Multifamily (MF-1),
Townho me (T H), Two-F amily (TF) and Res id ential S ingle-Family (RS).
Public Comment:
N/A - p res entatio n o nly. A pub lic hearing will be held at a future date.
Staff Recommendation:
N/A - p res entatio n o nly
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None studied at this time.
SUBMITTED BY:
Chris Yanez, C NU-A, Assistant P lanning Direc tor
Page 87 of 87