Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda_P&Z_06.01.2017Notice of Meeting for the Planning and Zoning Commission and Georgetown Transportation Adv isory Board Workshop of the City of Georgetown June 1, 2017 at 4:00 PM at GCAT Building, located at 510 W. 9th Street Georgetown, TX 78626 The City o f G eo rgeto wn is committed to comp lianc e with the Americans with Dis abilities Ac t (ADA). If yo u req uire as s is tanc e in participating at a p ublic meeting d ue to a disability, as d efined und er the ADA, reas onab le as s is tance, ad ap tatio ns , or acc o mmo d ations will b e provid ed up o n req uest. P leas e c o ntact the City Sec retary's Office, at leas t three (3) days prior to the sc hed uled meeting d ate, at (512) 930-3652 o r City Hall at 113 Eas t 8th Street fo r add itional info rmation; TTY us ers ro ute through Relay Texas at 711. This is a joint me eti ng of GTAB and P &Z to discuss the Wil li ams Dr ive Corr idor Study. No ac tion wil l be taken at this mee ti ng. Regular Session (This Regular S es s io n may, at any time, b e rec es s ed to convene an Exec utive S es s io n fo r any p urpose authorized b y the Op en Meetings Act, Texas Go vernment Co d e 551.) A Pres entatio n and d is cus s io n o f the CAMP O/C ity of Geo rgeto wn Williams Drive S tud y d raft Final Plan – Nathaniel Waggoner, AICP, P MP, Transp o rtatio n Analys t, and And reina Dávila-Quintero , Projec t Co o rd inator Adjournment CERTIFICATE OF POSTING I, Shelley No wling, C ity S ecretary fo r the C ity of Geo rgeto wn, Texas , d o hereby c ertify that this Notice of Meeting was p o s ted at City Hall, 113 E. 8th Street, a p lace read ily acc es s ible to the general p ublic at all times , on the ______ d ay o f __________________, 2017, at __________, and remained so p o s ted fo r at leas t 72 c o ntinuo us ho urs p receding the sc heduled time o f s aid meeting. ____________________________________ S helley No wling, City Sec retary Page 1 of 33 City of Georgetown, Texas Planning and Zoning June 1, 2017 SUBJECT: Presentatio n and dis c us sion of the CAMPO/City o f Georgetown Williams Drive Study draft F inal Plan – Nathaniel Waggo ner, AICP, PMP, Trans p o rtation Analyst, and Andreina Dávila-Quintero, P ro ject Coordinator ITEM SUMMARY: The Williams Drive Study is a partnership between the Cap ital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO) and the City o f Georgetown. The Study’s go al is to create safe and effic ient transportation o p tions while integrating s mart land use, c ommunity needs, and the future ec o nomic gro wth o f the corridor. The Draft Plan identifies relevant p ro jects and p o licies to imp ro ve the transp o rtatio n network and s upportive land us es to enhance mo b ility, c onnec tivity, safety, and multimodal o p tions , s upport ec o nomic d evelopment and enhance a sens e of p lace. T he c omplete Draft Plan may b e viewed o nline at: https://www.c amp o texas .org/c amp o -p lans/camp o -2045-p latinum-plan/georgetown-williams -d rive. At this works ho p , the P ro ject Team and Board members will review: · The P urpose and Go als of the Study; · P ublic Co mment; · C o nc ep t Plan; and · R ec ommend ed Implementation P lan. Next s teps will inc lud e c o nsideratio n and p os s ible recommend ation to City Counc il for acc ep tance o f the Williams Drive Study at the June 9th GTAB and June 20th P&Z meetings. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. SUBMITTED BY: Nathaniel Waggo ner, Trans p o rtatio n Analys t, and Andreina Dávila-Quintero, P ro ject Co o rd inato r ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Purpos e and Goals Exhibit Public Comment Exhibit Concept Plan Exhibit Implementation Plan Exhibit Page 2 of 33 Williams Drive is a critical gateway into the City of Georgetown. As such, it must strike a balance in providing: - mobility through an efficient, effective and reliable transportation network; - moving people and goods through multiple travel options - enhancing economic development and housing options within the neighborhoods it traverses. Proactive transportation and land use planning will assist the corridor in addressing the immediate and future mobility issues that stem from population growth and development pressures; positioning Williams Drive as a premier gateway for the City of Georgetown and the Capital region. Williams Drive Purpose & Goals Purpose Statement Goals for the study area will guide the development of improvement alternatives as the study progresses. The goals developed for the corridor include: Goal 1. Enhance multimodal movement and transportation operations. Goal 2. Support corridor-wide and regional sustainable growth and economic development. Goal 3. Protect and enhance the corridor’s quality of life. Goal 4. Encourage development that creates a variety of context sensitive mixed-use services that are accessible to neighborhoods. Study Goals Page 3 of 33 Outreach Efforts BREAKDOWN OF PUBLIC INPUT October Open House • 105 Attendees •70 Comments November Charrette Events • 86 Attendees •50 Comments 1,300 member email list 8,100 views 5,500 views 33,000 newspaper readers 400+ phone calls March Open House •82 Attendees •21 Comments Page 4 of 33 Exhibit C - Breakdown of Public Input Printed on 4/19/2017 Page 1 of 4 Location Area of Concern Mode 1 Need sidewalk and bicycle path from Williams Drive to riverwalk/ Booty's Crossing Park along DB Wood Dr. Current sidewalk ends at Fire Department Williams Drive/ DB Wood Road at Booty's Crossing Park Bicycle/Pedestrian Concern Bike/ Walk 2 Need better lighting between Lakeway to Sun City/ Jim Hogg Road Williams Drive between Lakeway dr to Jim Hogg Aesthetic Concern Built Form 3 Motel broken fence, drug raids, and dilapidated Williams Drive and Clay Street Aesthetic Concern Built Form 4 Allow development here to accentuate the Rive Williams Drive, just south of Rivery Blvd. Land Use Concern Built Form 5 Need to reserve frontage for commercial, services, office, etc. and serve needs of nearby residents of Sun City.Williams Drive near Sun City (Del Webb intersection and up)Land Use Concern Built Form 6 West end of Williams Needs more grocery store options- why is the HEB the only grocery store in the City? West end of Williams Drive Land Use Concern Built Form 7 Political sign board at Del Webb and Williams Drive is an eyesore Williams Drive at Del Webb Land Use Concern Built Form 8 Need a turn lane for Rivery Rd off of Williams Drive. Williams Drive at Rivery Rd. Vehicle Concern Car 9 Traffic lights not in sync. Traffic in PM not able to turn left, causing west traffic to back up.Williams Drive and Lakeway Dr, River Bend Dr., and Rivery Blvd. Vehicle Concern Car 10 Williams Drive needs to extend past Austin Avenue and connect to North College Street, or newer plans to any newer roads Williams Drive at Austin Avenue (proposed to North College)Vehicle Concern Car 11 Need more left turning lanes from Austin Avenue onto Williams Drive Austin Avenue at Williams Drive Vehicle Concern Car 12 2008 road bond project FM 971 (between Austin and NE Inner Loop) Vehicle Concern Car 13 Recommend 6 lanes for all of Williams Drive All of Williams Drive Vehicle Concern Car 14 Light synchronization Williams Drive at Woodlake Drive Vehicle Concern Car 15 Poor vehicle flow and very crowded parking at HEB at Williams Drive and DB Wood Road- crowded every time of day (dot #33)Williams Drive and DB Wood Rd. (HEB)Vehicle Concern Car 16 Ever since the Walmart general area was built, the increase in traffic flow on Mesquite Road has increased significantly. It could be considered as a minor artery. (dot # 34)Mesquite Road Vehicle Concern Car 17 Putting two bus stops on Dawn Dr. will add to the traffic. Dawn Dr. already has lots of traffic and for a curvy road, people travel too fast.Dawn Dr. Vehicle Concern Car 18 Upgrade the stoplight to a pole, not wire, long distance traffic signal (dot 36)Williams Drive at Serenada Dr. Vehicle Concern Car 19 Verde Vista Extension to Williams Drive Verde Vista dead end Vehicle Concern Car 20 Traffic study on light timing Williams Drive and Shell Rd/DB Wood Road Vehicle Concern Car 21 While not in the study, we use DB Wood to exit Williams and get to 35. They need 2 left turn lanes on University to make it a more attractive option and reduce Williams Drive traffic.University Drive at DB Woods (outside study area)Vehicle Concern Car 22 Deceleration lane to enter HEB coming from Sun City/ W Williams Drive at and DB Wood Road (HEB)Vehicle Concern Car 23 Heavy traffic on NW to bus route on Dawn Drive Dawn Drive Vehicle/Pedestrian Concern Car/Walk/Transit 24 Bus route should pick up apartments on Northwest Drive (Between Lakeway and Central) Northwest Drive between Lakeway and Central Vehicle Concern Transit 25 Wider sidewalks to cross Austin Avenue Williams Drive at Austin Avenue Pedestrian Concern Walk 26 Sidewalks on Shell Road from Bowling to Overlook Shell Road from Bowling to Overlook Pedestrian Concern Walk 27 Sidewalks from Merrick Apartments at Estrella to DB Wood Estrella to DB Wood Road Pedestrian Concern Walk 28 Split up traffic crossing I-35 and Austin Avenue- Add a Bridge, one way each. SE bound, branch off of Cedar Drive. Swing around behind River View Mall, cross over I-35 and connect to W. Morrow Street.Alternative Route Car 29 Split up traffic crossing I-35 and Austin Ave- NW bound goes off of Austin Avenue N. or Republic Square at Chamber Way, cross over I-35, connect to Park Ln., then connect to Dawn Drive, to Lakeway or Wagonwheel before re-merging to Williams Dr.Alternative Route Car 30 Significant redesign for Austin Avenue, past Rivery. Need to allow better thru traffic movement. Austin Avenue- past Rivery Car 31 Additional traffic on Dawn Dr with bus service on that street. We already have a huge amount of traffic and people speeding. This is a two curve street as it is. There are a number of children on this street and it makes it almost impossible for them to ride bicycles except on the sidewalk- which walkers also use. Dawn Drive Car/ Transit /Bike/Walk 32 Link east Georgetown to west Georgetown with a land mass over 35 from 29 to North Loop. Fill in with buildings, parks, and pedestrian malls. From 29 to North Loop. Walk 33 I saw nothing relating to the Randall's development at the corner of Hogg Road and Williams Drive Hogg Road and Williams Drive Built form 34 The traffic on Mesquite Rd increased so much since the development of Walmart and all the other retail in the area. I feel that Mesquite can now be considered a minor artery street. Mesquite Road Car 35 Suggest moving bus route to Northwest. Northwest Drive Transit 36 Other roads that need bike access off William's Drive are Lakeway- all the way to Austin Avenue on the other side of the interstate. Williams Drive- all roads connecting from Lakeway to Austin Ave. Bike 37 people heading south. Williams Drive at 1-35 Frontage Road intersection Car 38 Williams Drive and N. Austin Avenue intersection is a disaster. Left turns off of Williams into the Chipotle/ Starbucks should be prohibited to alleviate traffic back ups. Left turns into McDonalds at the same intersection should be prohibited. Williams Drive at Austin Avenue Car Williams Drive Study Public Comments Data Comment Sheets October 6th Open House Page 5 of 33 Exhibit C - Breakdown of Public Input Printed on 4/19/2017 Page 2 of 4 Location Area of Concern Mode Williams Drive Study Public Comments Data Comment Sheets 39 Red light be installed at Williams Drive and CR 245 Williams Drive at CR 245 Car 40 You are probably using traffic flow data of a year ago that is flawed, as it does not include peak shopping hours at HEB (10am- 12pm and 2-4pm)Williams Drive at DB Wood (HEB) Car 41 Consider over-pass at crucial intersections: Williams Drive at DB Wood and Lakeway Williams Drive at DB Wood and Lakeway Intersection Car 42 Red lights be installed at Ronald Reagan and Williams Drive Williams Drive at Ronald Reagan Car 43 Shoulders on Williams Drive- used by cyclists. When a right hand turn lane take away the shoulder, a bike-through access should be added similar to what is occurring up and down Farmer/Ronald Reagan. Williams Drive Corridor Bike 44 If we can fix the vehicular and pedestrian issues then we can talk about bicycles but it is Texas, it is hot and the percentage of the population impacted by bike lanes is miniscule.Williams Drive Corridor Bike/Car/Walk 45 Need to reserve road frontage for commercial, retail, offices, services, etc. to support the needs of nearby residents. Williams Drive Corridor Built Form 46 Multi-family developments in area need to be restricted. They put much more traffic on roads and commute beyond the local area. Williams Drive Corridor Built form/ Car 47 Uninterrupted turn lane down the middle of Williams Drive, giving ample opportunity for conflicting left hand turns. This should be divided by a median.Williams Drive Corridor Car 48 Williams Drive- Add right hand turn lanes.Williams Drive Corridor Car 49 Widen Williams Drive. Add additional traffic lanes. Williams Drive Corridor Car 50 I drive from my house in old town to Embree (most of the 6-miles) on average round trip twice a day. Williams Drive Corridor Car 51 Make right hand turn lanes along the whole of Williams Drive (not just intersections. Need to stop the back up of cars when turning into businesses.Williams Drive Corridor Car 52 Lack of sidewalk- I see little reason why the entire 6-mile strip should not have a sidewalk on both sides. Williams Drive Corridor Walk 53 Williams Drive- Add sidewalks. Williams Drive Corridor Walk 54 Plan/encourage for more and better development beyond Jim Hogg now to prevent future problems. Williams Drive- past Jim Hogg Built form 55 Future of Williams Drive- extending toward North College to Highway 29 Williams Drive to Highway 29 Car 56 As one gets closer to 35 the traffic increases. Fact. Williams Drive toward I-35 intersection Car 57 6 bike clubs/organizations in Georgetown and cycling continues to grow. We need to modernize our thinking on our roads, not one size fits all. Bike 58 New developments needed north to 195 and south to 29. Built Form 59 Consider greater employment opportunities within immediate and nearby area. Built form 60 Re-think further into the future and make alternative north/south corridors more attractive and wider to pull more traffic off Williams.Car 61 No reasonable alternative routes to downtown- there is only Williams Dr. Car 62 Consider parallel road to compliment and relieve Williams Dr road volume. Car 63 Add continuous turn lanes at major intersections. Car 64 Interconnect between business parking lots to keep cars off streets. Car 65 Very well presented, I appreciate being allowed to be part of this process. 66 Your study doesn't extend to Williams Dr and 3405 as it should. 67 Your poster presentation contains incorrect street connections. 68 Think bigger. Hold a design charrette for city planning or invited universities (Texas Tech/Houston/Arlington/UTSA/Am) I would not considering how badly Austin turned out. 69 Living in Sun City. Areas of concern include: 70 Look to shorten distance between points of origin (home) and destination (whatever that may be). 71 Too much asphalt Vehicle/Roadway Vehicle/Roadway 72 Landscaped median with designated left-turns to lots/businesses Vehicle/Roadway Vehicle/Roadway 73 How to widen the road without adversely impacting commercial businesses Vehicle/Roadway Vehicle/Roadway 74 Have shared use pathway on one side of the street at western end Bike/Ped Bike/Ped 75 Town Center use at Jim Hogg Land Use Land Use 76 Small standalone retail on western end Land Use Land Use 77 Small scale sub divisions on western end Land Use Land Use 78 Congested D B Wood Road/Williams Drive Vehicle/Roadway Vehicle/Roadway 79 Multi-modal transit Transit Transit 80 Town Center Walkability Pedestrian Pedestrian 81 Street Lighting D B Wood Road to Serenada Pedestrian/Vehicle/Roadway Pedestrian/Vehicle/Roadway 82 Congested Lakeway Vehicle/Roadway Vehicle/Roadway 83 Congested Rivery Vehicle/Roadway Vehicle/Roadway November 12th-16th Charrette Page 6 of 33 Exhibit C - Breakdown of Public Input Printed on 4/19/2017 Page 3 of 4 Location Area of Concern Mode Williams Drive Study Public Comments Data Comment Sheets 84 Congested I-35 Vehicle/Roadway Vehicle/Roadway 85 Congested Austin Avenue Vehicle/Roadway Vehicle/Roadway 86 Mixed Use development GISD site Land Use Land Use 87 Mixed Use development I-35/Austin Avenue Land Use Land Use 88 Landscaping I-35 Interchange Vehicle/Roadway Vehicle/Roadway 89 Mixed Use development at major intersections Land Use Land Use 90 Interconnectivity in road design Vehicle/Roadway Vehicle/Roadway 91 Safety/access management with medians Vehicle/Roadway Vehicle/Roadway 92 Interconnectivity between parcels Land Use Land Use 93 Access management away from intersections Vehicle/Roadway Vehicle/Roadway 94 Shell Road connection to Williams Not safe Shell Road Vehicle/Roadway Vehicle/Roadway 95 Access between properties and subivisions Vehicle/Roadway Vehicle/Roadway 96 Speeding vehicles (Need slower speed in Centers Area)Lakeway Dr EB Vehicle/Roadway Vehicle/Roadway 97 Walkable center Lakeway/Booty's Pedestrian Pedestrian 98 Better Connectivity to street grid and downtown Vehicle/Roadway Vehicle/Roadway 99 Put needs near where people live (Basic services - small centers)Land Use Land Use 100 Drive traffic off corridor to use 195 and 29 Vehicle/Roadway Vehicle/Roadway 101 Need Green Pockets to connect to City trail system Bike/Ped Bike/Ped 102 No sidewalks or opportunities to cross I-35/Williams Drive Pedestrian Pedestrian 103 Traffic on Dawn Drive from Lakeway to Central Dr Dawn Drive Vehicle/Roadway Vehicle/Roadway 104 Traffic on Mesquite Rd from River Bend to Country Club Rd Vehicle/Roadway Vehicle/Roadway 105 Modify tree ordinance to save trees along road frontage Land Use Land Use 106 Bury Utilities Land Use Land Use 107 Street Lighting Vehicle/Roadway Vehicle/Roadway 108 Need to fund façade improvements Land Use Land Use 109 No Roundabout on Rivery Blvd Vehicle/Roadway Vehicle/Roadway 110 Include shared use path along Williams Drive Bike/Ped Bike/Ped 111 Include sidewalks along the entirety of the corridor Pedestrian Pedestrian 112 Buffered bike lanes and sidewalks where appropriate Bike/Ped Bike/Ped 113 Create buffer from sidewalks to roadway Pedestrian Pedestrian 114 Cycle track in centers areas Bike/Ped Bike/Ped 115 Remove TWCTL to include medians an left-turn pockets Vehicle/Roadway Vehicle/Roadway 116 Excellent options - very interested in more biking trails & lanes Bike 117 Appreciate elimination of suicide lanes Vehicle/Roadway 118 Access management = safety Vehicle/Roadway 119 Traffic Signal Optimization Vehicle/Roadway 120 Density: Are the decision makers on board Land Use 121 Light timing on Williams Drive is an easy and cheap fix Car 122 Seems too much work on bike paths. This is not Austin Bike 123 Sceondary route needed rom Sedro Trail Road (Charparro Estates)Sedro Trail Car 124 We have been dealing with increased traffic since Sun City was built. The City allowed Sun City to block the secondary route with homes but we still don't have a secondary route. Please fix this problem that the City created. We have been waiting 20+ years Sun City Car 125 Well done and impressive General 126 The small hurdles will be worth the effort General 127 Looking forward to the I35/Austin Avenue final plan i35/Austin Ave Car 128 This looks great.General 129 Cost will be enormous but so will the cost of doing nothing.General 130 I know it's minor but lighting should be considered particularly with the projected increase in pedestrian and bicycle traffic Lighting 131 Concerned that emphasis are not on other corridors (Austin Ave, University Ave to D.B Woods)Downtown/other areas General 132 Concerned that other priorities are for development and not the new City Hall and municipal buildings.General 133 I think the priorities are not in the right place and the study is the wrong place and places the old town on the back burner General March 9th Open House Page 7 of 33 Exhibit C - Breakdown of Public Input Printed on 4/19/2017 Page 4 of 4 Location Area of Concern Mode Williams Drive Study Public Comments Data Comment Sheets 134 The CCTL on Williams is being eliminated. At times of high traffic there will not be an avalable passage way for emergency vehicles Car 135 Otherwise the concepts look reasonable. The parking and interconnectivity is a good approach. Potential problems could be access to buisnesses Parking/Connectivity 136 Signal control could allow for :go green: to allow thru traffic to clear roadway and not bottleneck in meregncy situations car 137 Make Wildwood Drive entrance to 2 lanes. Left lane is required and other lane can be left, right or straight (just like Rivery Blvd)Wildwood car 138 Nw Blvd: If proposed changes include diverting school age buses to NW Blvd, wouldn't sidewalks be vital for safety on the main thoorughfare. Concerned that pedestrian safety at this area NW Blvd Pedestrian 139 There are lots of bikes, walkers and kids on NW Blvd from Frost School, how will this work with increased traffic NW Blvd Pedestrian/Bike 140 Lower Income housing - concern that ir is right in the middle of low density safer neighborhood on NW Blvd. Crime, crime, crime, lock doors, no walking around at night Rivery Blvd Housing 141 School buses take 25mins to load and unload on NW Blvd at 7am sharp and 3:15pm everryday. Where is your common sense.NW Blvd Car Page 8 of 33 Williams Drive Study Corridor Wide Improvements • Eliminate multiple curb cuts 1 • Consolidate driveways 2 • Encourage interparcel connections 3 • Raised medians 4 Access Management Before After • Enable shared parking management practices • Promotes “park once” opportunities Parking Management 1 1 2 24 3 Each number corresponds to a corridor improvement treatment Page 9 of 33 Williams Drive Study Corridor Wide Improvements • Synchronize traffic lights to improve trip reliability • Include operational improvements such as bike signals, signage, and pedestrian beacons • Improve safety and performance at intersections Traffic Operations Management • Added capacity through operational enhancements • Implementation of traffic calming strategies • Addition of bus pullouts Traffic Operations Management Corridor Travel Time Factors Corridor Travel Time (Minutes) - Jim Hogg to Austin Ave Morning Evening Eastbound Westbound Eastbound Westbound Existing Timing 11.1 13.7 12.5 14.7 With Concept Improvements 10.3 (-7.7%) 9.8 (-39.8%) 10.4 (-20.2%) 10.0 (-47.0%) Page 10 of 33 Williams Drive Study Proposed Network Connections Local Street Network • Additional streets can handle 48,000 cars per day compared with 29,000 on Williams Drive alone • Lack of parallel routes to Williams Drive increases pressure on the corridor • A better connected network of streets provide alternate routes, may decrease travel time, and improve capacity in the corridor • While the Williams Drive corridor access is somewhat bound by Lake Georgetown to the northwest, this map outlines vehicular connections that would provide additional network connectivity on both a local and regional level Proposed Street Connections Page 11 of 33 Williams Drive Study Bicycle Facilities Legend Shared Lanes On-Street Bicycle Lane River Trail Connecting Streets Study Area Boundary Cycle Track On-Street Bicycle Lane Sidepath Parallel Bicycle Route Existing Facilities Proposed Facilities Additional 17 miles of bikeways Page 12 of 33 Williams Drive Study Pedestrian Facilities Sidewalk Conditions Limited Failure Priority Two Failing No Sidewalk Master Plan Priority Tiers Priority Three LegendPedestrian Priority Page 13 of 33 Williams Drive Character Areas Character Areas •Williams Drive transverses 6 areas with distinctly different character •Each area differs in width of pavement, posted traffic speed, and in the use and form of adjacent development •These characteristics contribute to each area’s identity and the experience of visiting, or traveling through it •Each area was used to designate the different conditions and approach to transportation infrastructure and the way development would interface with Williams Drive I-35 Page 14 of 33 Williams Drive - Corridor Concept Jimm Hogg Rd. to Cedar Lake Blvd. • Preserved hill-country landscape buffer from sidewalk • Buildings pulled up to internal sidewalk or set behind a double row and aisle of parking Form & Character • Two vehicle travel lanes in either direction with inner lanes and outer lanes incorporating a curb and gutter • A planted center median with left hand turn pockets would be provided throughout enabling access management • Sidewalk along the north side of the corridor • Pedestrian space along the building frontage on the southern side of the corridor • Two planted pedestrian buffers on either side of the street separating the sidepath and sidewalk from vehicle traffic • Two planted pedestrian buffers on either side of the street separating the sidepath and sidewalk from parking lots and building frontages as appropriate • Sidepath along the south side of the corridor Travel Lanes Pedestrian & Bicycle I-35 Page 15 of 33 Williams Drive - Corridor Concept Cedar Lake Blvd. to Serenada Dr. • Wide landscaped buffer from sidewalk • Buildings pulled up to internal sidewalk or set behind a double row and aisle of parking Form & Character • Two vehicle travel lanes in either direction with curb and gutter for drainage • Planted center median with left-turn pockets • Sidewalk along the north side of the corridor • Sidepath along the south side of the corridor • Pedestrian space along the building frontage on the southern side of the corridor • Planted pedestrian buffers on both sides of the street to separate pedestrians from traffic and parking lots Travel Lanes Pedestrian & Bicycle I-35 Page 16 of 33 Williams Drive - Corridor Concept Serenada Dr. to Lakeway Dr. • Remove and consolidate driveways • Landscaped buffer from sidewalk with buildings pulled up to internal sidewalk or set Form & Character • Vehicle travel lanes in either direction with curb and gutter for drainage • Planted center median with left-turn pockets • Sidewalk along the north side of the corridor • Sidepath along the south side of the corridor • Pedestrian space along the building frontage on the southern side of the corridor • Planted pedestrian buffers on both sides of the street to separate pedestrians from traffic and parking lots • Sidepath along the south side of the corridor Travel Lanes Pedestrian & Bicycle I-35 Page 17 of 33 Future Land Use Map Williams Drive Centers Area The Centers Area plan is a plan for a vibrant mixed-use center and gateway along Williams Drive from an area south of Austin Avenue to Lakeway Drive, consistent with the City’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan, special taxing district, and land use overlays. Centers Area Plan Based on input from residents and analysis by the consultant team, this map provides land use recommendations for the Centers Area. Land Use & Built Form These recommendations advocate for greater diversity in uses which creates a vibrant Centers Area. Proposed new zoning districts recommending new building types, generalized uses, height and setbacks will create an attractive and appealing Centers Area. Page 18 of 33 Williams Drive - Corridor Concept Lakeway Dr. to Golden Oaks Dr. • Remove and consolidate driveways • Landscaped buffer from sidewalk with buildings pulled up to internal sidewalk or set behind a double row and aisle of parking Form & Character • Vehicle travel lanes in either direction with curb and gutter for drainage • Planted center median with left-turn pockets • Sidewalks on either side of the corridor • Pedestrian space along the building frontage on the southern side of the corridor • Two planted pedestrian buffers on either side of the street separating the sidepath and sidewalk from vehicle traffic • Two planted pedestrian buffers on either side of the street separating the sidewalk from parking lots and building frontages as appropriate • No dedicated on-street bike facility • Shared bicycle and vehicles lanes on either side of the corridor • Signed bicycle routes on parallel neighborhood streets Travel Lanes Pedestrian & Bicycle I-35 Page 19 of 33 Williams Drive - Corridor Concept Golden Oaks Dr. to Rivery Blvd. •Wide landscaped buffer from sidewalk •Buildings pulled up to internal sidewalk or set behind a double row and aisle of parking Form & Character •Two vehicle travel lanes in either direction with curb and gutter for drainage •ʥenter median with left-turn pockets •Sidewalk along the north side of the corridor •Sidepath along the south side of the corridor •Pedestrian space along the building frontage on the southern side of the corridor •Planted pedestrian buffers on both sides of the street to separate pedestrians from traffic and parking lots Travel Lanes Pedestrian & Bicycle I-35 Page 20 of 33 Williams Drive - Centers Concept Rivery Blvd. to I-35 • Store fronts with windows • Pulled up to the sidewalk • Frequent entrances Form & Character • Two vehicle travel lanes in either direction with inner lanes and outer lanes incorporating a curb and gutter for drainage • Planted center median with left-turn pockets • Potential for future use of curb lane for off- peak parking usage • Sidewalks on either side of the corridor adjacent to the building frontages • Bike accommodations on either side of the street, adjacent to the sidewalk and separated from the travel lanes with a planted buffer Travel Lanes Pedestrian & Bicycle I-35 Page 21 of 33 Williams Drive - Centers Concept Austin Avenue • Creation of urban street wall • Side access drive with parking • Gateway character to Downtown Form & Character • Two vehicle travel lanes in either direction with curb and gutter for drainage • Planted center median with left-turn pockets • Access drive on either side of roadway with a travel lane and parking lane • Sidewalks on either side of the corridor • Two planted pedestrian buffers on either side of the street separating the sidewalk from vehicle traffic and the access drive • Bike accommodations on either side of the street, adjacent to the sidewalk and separated from the travel lanes with a planted buffer Travel Lanes Pedestrian & Bicycle I-35 Page 22 of 33 Williams Drive Lake Aire Center • Mixed-use development of frontage parcels with existing building to remain short-term • Long-term development to increase development incorporating residential and office uses Form & Character • Reduction in overall parking numbers to incorporate shared-use parking strategies • Sidewalks on either side of the corridor • Sidewalk along the north side of the corridor Pedestrian space along the building frontage on the southern side of the corridor • Planted pedestrian buffers on both sides of the street to separate pedestrians from traffic and parking lots • Sidepath along the south side of the corridor Parking Pedestrian Short Term • No dedicated on street facility • Shared bicycle and vehicles lanes on either side of the corridor • Signed bicycle routes on parallel neighborhood streets Bicycle Long Term Option A Option B Page 23 of 33 Phase I: 0-5 Years Williams Drive - Centers Concept GISD Catalytic Site • Potential development on the GISD site along the new Rivery Blvd. • A developer could provide residential units, both multifamily and attached single family, on the portion of the site that would not require any demolition • A developer could test the market, providing returns without making large investments developing the site Phase I Phase II: 6-10 Years • A developer could build on their investment with modest improvements to the site using a conventional suburban development model • The site could support a small grocery store and single story retail, while preserving the rest of the site to develop as a mixed-use center in future phases • Small medical offices could be acquired and demolished to a develop surface parking, while keeping the school structures intact to producing rental income Phase II Page 24 of 33 Phase III: 10+ Years Williams Drive - Centers Concept GISD Catalytic Site • Enough momentum could generate around the site to change the development market • A developer could demolish the school buildings and begin to establish the center of a walkable district • The site could support a set of mixed- use buildings with ground floor retail, establishing a new walkable destination built around Williams Drive and a central boulevard Phase III Phase IV: Site Expansion • Future development of properties adjacent to the GISD site could help complete the transformation of the school site into a walkable district • This plan represents what could happen if two additional parcels on Williams Drive were acquired and redeveloped to include a 3-story mixed-use building and district stormwater facilities • Parking in the back improves the walkability of this section of Williams Drive Phase IV Page 25 of 33 Williams Dr Study Implementation Plan As of May 24, 2017 TRAFFIC CONGESTION AND OPERATIONS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Timeframe No. Action Item Length Project Cost Estimate Potential Funding Source Funded/ Committed Partners T-01 Rivery Blvd extension from Williams Dr to Northwest Blvd (build) .42 miles $ 10,500,000 2015 Road Bond X T-02 Reconstruction and new construction of Northwest Blvd from Fondana Dr to Austin Ave, including proposed bridge over IH 35 (build).42 miles $ 11,150,000 2015 Road Bond X T-03 Intersection improvement at Williams Dr and IH-35 .27 miles $ 52,000,000 TxDOT My35 X TxDOT T-04 Eastbound right-turn lane Williams Dr to SB Rivery Blvd .04 miles $ 345,959 Developer/City of Georgetown X Rivery TIA T-05 Northbound right-turn Rivery Blvd to eastbound Williams Dr .034 miles $ 284,000 Developer/City of Georgetown X Rivery TIA T-06 Intersection operation improvements for Austin Ave and Williams Dr .04 miles $ 500 Developer/City of Georgetown TxDOT T-07 Preliminary Engineering analysis for access management/driveway consolidation, intersection improvements, network connections, capacity, speed, and utilities 7 miles $ 515,000 TIA Funds/TIRZ Fund/City General Fund T-08 Install a painted median and center left hand turn pockets along one of the character areas of the Williams Dr corridor (pilot program)1 mile $ 18,303 City General Fund T-09 Traffic Signal Coordination from Austin Avenue to Jim Hogg Rd 5.8 miles $ 24,000 City General Fund X T-10 Inventory existing traffic signal infrastructure and identify standard operating systems/upgrades, limited implementation 5.8 miles $ 24,000 City General Fund X T-11 Promote Go-Geo $ 5,000 City General Fund T-12 Communication/Public Education about alternate routes, best practices/suggestions during peak hours. $ 10,000 T-13 Work with the Post Office to relocate individual mail boxes USPS USPS T-14 Establish Traffic Management Center (TMC) and appropriate staffing 6 miles $ 200,000 Bonds T-15 Work with Police Department for enforcement and traffic control $ 25,000 TIA Funds, Bonds T-16 Stripe Northwest Blvd to accommodate a 10 foot center turn lane, two 10 foot through lanes, and two 5-foot bike lanes on either side off the roadway 1.2 miles $ 304,128 Street Maintenance T-17 Install raised, planted center medians with left hand turn pockets in the Centers Area 1.25 miles $ 2,376,000 Bonds, GTEC, Street Maintenance T-18 Reconfigure Northwest Blvd's 40 foot wide roadway to accommodate a 10 foot center turn lane, two 10 foot through lanes, and two 5-foot bike lanes on either side off the roadway 1.2 miles $ 4,093,056 City General Fund T-19 New Roadway to connect Rivery Blvd to Riverside Dr 0.40 miles $ 4,224,000 TIRZ Funds T-20 Implement a center island on Northwest Blvd at Windmill Cove N/A $ 38,016 City General Fund T-21 Implement shared streets within the Georgetown Independent School District site N/A N/A Developer Funds GISD T-22 Extend Apple Creek Dr to connect to Northwest Blvd 0.10 miles $ 1,056,000 Developer/Bonds Developer T-23 Install raised, planted center medians with left hand turn pockets in the Corridor Area (Lakeway Dr to DB Wood Blvd)2.3 miles $ 4,324,320 Bonds T-24 New construction of frontage road on northbound IH 35 from Williams Dr to Lakeway Bridge (build)1.90 miles $ 7,000,000 2015 Road Bond X T-25 Reconstruction of DB Wood Dr from Oak Ridge Dr To Lake Overlook Dr (Plan) 1.46 miles $ 8,000,000 2015 Road Bond X T-26 Reconstruction of Shell Rd from Williams Dr to Shell Spur Rd (Plan) 2.45 miles $ 18,480,000 2015 Road Bond X Sh o r t ( 0 - 4 y e a r s ) Mi d ( 5 - 1 0 y e a r s ) Page 1 of 6Page 26 of 33 Williams Dr Study Implementation Plan As of May 24, 2017 T-27 Reconstruction of IH 35 SB Frontage Rd from Williams Dr To Rivery Blvd (plan) .54 miles $ 4,436,000 2015 Road Bond X T-28 Intersection improvements along Williams Dr from Rivery Blvd to IH 35 Frontage Rd (plan).38 miles $ 1,894,000 2015 Road Bond X T-29 New Roadway connecting Limestone Lake Dr to Williams Dr 0.5 miles $ 5,280,000 Developer/Bonds Developer T-30 New Roadway connecting Verde Vista Dr to Williams Dr at Woodlake Dr 0.25 miles $ 2,640,000 Developer/Bonds Developer T-31 New Roadway to connect La Paloma Dr to Sabine Dr 0.50 miles $ 5,280,000 Developer/Bonds Developer T-32 New Roadway to connect Country Rd to Pecan Lane at Booty's Crossing Rd 0.40 miles $ 4,224,000 Developer/Bonds Developer T-33 New Roadway to connect Serenada Dr to Oak Crest Lane at Booty's Crossing Rd 0.50 miles $ 5,280,000 Developer/Bonds Developer T-34 New Roadway to connect Lakeway Dr to River Bend Dr at Westwood Lane 0.40 miles $ 4,224,000 Developer/Bonds Developer T-35 New Roadway to connect River Bend Lane to Park Lane 0.30 miles $ 3,168,000 Developer/Bonds Developer T-36 New Roadway to connect Oak Lane Circle between Ranch Rd and Parkway Street 0.06 miles $ 633,600 Developer/Bonds Developer T-37 New Roadway to connect W Janis Dr to Park Lane 0.25 miles $ 2,640,000 Developer/Bonds Developer T-38 Install raised, planted center medians with left hand turn pockets in the Corridor Area (DB Wood Blvd to Jim Hogg Rd)2.3 miles $ 4,324,320 Bonds Total Costs $ 169,021,202 Lo n g ( B e y o n d 1 0 y e a r s ) * *T i m e f r a m e t o b e D e v e l o p m e n t D r i v e n Page 2 of 6Page 27 of 33 Williams Dr Study Implementation Plan As of May 24, 2017 BARRIERS TO REDEVELOPMENT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Timeframe No. Action Item Length Project Cost Estimate Potential Funding Source Funded/ Committed Partners R-01 Update the City’s Comprehensive Plan to incorporate Williams Dr recommendations Staff Time Funded - FY2017 Budget X R-02 Amend the FLU map to include a subarea plan for the Centers Area $ 24,500 TIRZ Funds X R-03 Adjust the TIRZ boundary to include the entirety of the GISD site and adjacent sites and develop TIRZ spending plan Staff Time R-04 Engineering studies for water, wastewater, drainage/stormwater/water quality $ 200,000 City General Fund, Utility Fund R-05 Work with GISD on potential redevelopment of catalytic site N/A GISD R-06 Review and update the development standards applicable to properties in the Williams Dr Centers Area, specifically regulations pertaining to block/lot standards, landscaping, signage, and streetscape improvements Staff Time R-07 Adopt a MU district/SP overlay district/Rezoning for the Centers Area Staff Time R-08 Adopt a MU district/SP overlay district/Rezoning for the Catalytic Site(s) Staff Time R-09 Create a special assessment/financial district to fund these recommended public projects Staff Time Total Costs $ 224,500 plus Staff Time Sh o r t ( 0 - 4 y e a r s ) Page 3 of 6Page 28 of 33 Williams Dr Study Implementation Plan As of May 24, 2017 AESTHETICS ENHANCEMENTS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Timeframe No. Action Item Length Project Cost Estimate Potential Funding Source Funded/ Committed Partners A-01 Update City’s Comprehensive Plan to incorporate Williams Dr recommendations, specifically as it applies to gateways Staff Time Funded - FY2017 Budget X A-02 Remove empty telephone poles on the north side of Williams Dr between Shell Rd and La Paloma $ 500 City of Georgetown Electric Fund A-03 Update the City's UDC relating to the Gateway Overlay district standards as these apply to the Williams Dr Corridor. This may include new regulations pertaining to signage, front building façade and parking in addition to landscaping. Staff Time A-04 Undertake corridor wide signage and wayfinding study $ 40,000 TIRZ Funds, City General Fund A-05 Intersection demonstration gardens at the intersection of Williams Dr and I-35 $ 5,000 TDS TDS/Wilco Master Naturalists A-06 Draft and adopt a grant program to incentivize or assist in signage, street frontage landscaping and other streetscape improvements Staff Time CAMPO/TxDOT A-07 Implement corridor wide aesthetic enhancements (landscaping, street lighting, signage and wayfinding) $ 100,000 TIRZ Funds, GTEC, City General Fund TxDOT Total Costs $ 145,500 plus Staff Time Sh o r t ( 0 - 4 y e a r s ) Mi d ( 5 - 1 0 ye a r s ) Page 4 of 6Page 29 of 33 Williams Dr Study Implementation Plan As of May 24, 2017 PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE FACILITIES IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Timeframe No. Action Item Length Project Cost Estimate Potential Funding Source Funded/ Committed Partners P-01 Design and construction of sidewalk along the west side of Austin Ave from Morrow St to Williams Dr .16 miles $ 20,000 2015 Bonds X TxDOT P-02 Remove mid-block pedestrian crossing on Williams Dr between I-35 and Rivery Blvd 0.01 miles $ 1,000 Street Maintenance P-03 Preliminary Engineering analysis and schematic design for bikeways along and parallel to Williams Dr 7 miles $ 5,000 TIA Funds P-04 Undertake a Citywide Bicycle Master Plan N/A $ 65,000 City General Fund P-05 APS Signal Upgrades at Williams Dr and Lakeway Dr, Williams Dr and Shell/DB Wood Rd, Williams Dr and Wildwood Dr, Williams Dr and Lakewood Dr, and Williams Dr and Rivery Blvd 5 signals $ 250,000 2015 City Bonds X P-06 Implement buffered bike lanes along both sides of Williams Dr between Jim Hogg Rd and Lakeway Dr 5 miles $ 409,500 Street Maintenance P-07 Implement an on-street bicycle lane along W Sequoia Spur from Shell Rd to Val Verde Dr 0.7 miles $ 49,379 Street Maintenance, Parks P-08 Implement on-street bicycle lanes along Serenada Dr between Booty's Crossing and Northwest Blvd, continuing east along Northwest Blvd to just east of E. Janis Dr 1.6 miles $ 112,865 Street Maintenance, Parks P-09 Implement parallel signed bicycle routes along Park Lane between Williams Dr and W Central Dr, along Dawn Dr between Park Lane and Western Trail, and along Mesquite Lane between Booty's Crossing and Rivery Blvd 3.6 miles $ 215,931 City General Fund P-10 Install and repair sidewalks and curb ramps along Williams Dr between Lakeway Dr and Rivery Blvd, and Lakeway Dr between Williams Dr and Northwest Blvd 1 mile of sidewalk $ 316,800 City General Fund P-11 Install and repair sidewalks and curb ramps along Whisper Oaks Dr between Lakeway Dr and Northwest Blvd .17 mile of sidewalk $ 52,560 City General Fund P-12 Install and repair sidewalks and curb ramps along Broken Spoke Trl between Western Trail and Lakeway Dr .19 mile of sidewalk $ 60,000 City General Fund P-13 Install and repair sidewalks and curb ramps along Williams Dr between Estrella Crossing and Lakeway Dr 2 miles of sidewalk $ 633,600 City General Fund P-14 Implement on-street bicycle lanes along Shell Rd and DB Wood Rd between Westbury Lane and Cedar Breaks Rd 3.4 miles $ 239,839 City General Fund P-15 Install and repair sidewalks and curb ramps along Shell/DB Wood Rd between Lake Overlook Rd and the city limit at approximately Westbury Lane 3 miles of sidewalk $ 950,400 City General Fund, PID Developer P-16 Implement on-street bicycle lanes along Country Rd from Williams Dr to the proposed sidepath at Booty's Crossing Rd 0.42 miles $ 29,627 City General Fund P-17 Implement a sidepath on I-35 south Frontage Rd from Northwest Blvd to Rivery Blvd 1 mile $ 2,756,160 TxDOT My35 TxDOT P-18 Implement a sidepath from Apple Creek Dr along the north side of I-35 to the I- 35 north Frontage Rd and extending to San Gabriel Village Blvd 1 mile $ 1,378,080 TxDOT My35 TxDOT Sh o r t ( 0 - 4 y e a r s ) Mi d ( 5 - 1 0 y e a r s ) Page 5 of 6Page 30 of 33 Williams Dr Study Implementation Plan As of May 24, 2017 P-19 Implement a sidepath along Booty's Crossing Rd between Williams Dr and DB Wood Rd 1.9 miles $ 5,236,704 City General Fund, Future Bond Election, Private Development P-20 Implement a sidepath on Rivery Blvd Extended from Northwest Blvd to Williams Dr 0.5 miles $ 1,378,080 City General Fund/ Private Development Developer P-21 Install and repair sidewalks and curb ramps along streets surrounding Georgetown Independent School District site including Park Lane, Shannon Lane, and Janis Dr 2 miles of sidewalk $ 1,193,914 Site Development GISD P-22 Implement a cycle track along both sides of Williams Dr between Rivery Blvd and I-35 1 mile $ 2,756,160 Private Development Developer P-23 Implement a sidepath along Williams Dr between Jim Hogg Rd and Lakeway Dr 4.3 miles $ 11,851,488 City General Fund, Future Bond Election, Private Development Developer P-24 Implement a sidepath along Northwest Blvd from just east of E. Janis Dr, across I 35, to San Gabriel Park 1 mile $ 2,756,160 City General Fund, Future Bond Election, Private Development Developer Total Costs $ 32,718,247 Lo n g ( B e y o n d 1 0 y e a r s ) Page 6 of 6Page 31 of 33 Williams Drive Study Implementation Plan Short Term (0-4 years) Page 32 of 33 Williams Drive Study Implementation Plan Short Term (0-4 years) Page 33 of 33