The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda_P&Z_12.01.2015Notice of Meeting for the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Georgetown December 1, 2015 at 6:00 PM at City Council Chambers, 101 E. 7th Street, Georgetown The City of Georgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If you require assistance in participating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the ADA, reasonable assistance, adaptations, or accommodations will be provided upon request. Please contact the City at least four (4) days prior to the scheduled meeting date, at (512) 930-3652 or City Hall at 113 East 8th Street for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. Call to Order Pledge of Allegiance Comments from the Chair - Welcome and Meeting Procedures Action from Executive Session Public Wishing to Address the Board On a subject that is posted on this agenda: Please fill out a speaker registration form which can be found at the Board meeting. Clearly print your name, the letter of the item on which you wish to speak, and present it to the Staff Liaison, preferably prior to the start of the meeting. You will be called forward to speak when the Board considers that item. On a subject not posted on the agenda: Persons may add an item to a future Board agenda by filing a written request with the Staff Liaison no later than one week prior to the Board meeting. The request must include the speaker's name and the specific topic to be addressed with sufficient information to inform the board and the public. For Board Liaison contact information, please logon to http://government.georgetown.org/category/boards-commissions/. A - As of the deadline, no persons were signed up to speak on items other than what was posted on the agenda. Consent Agenda The Statutory Consent Agenda includes non-controversial and routine items that may be acted upon with one single vote. An item may be pulled from the Consent Agenda in order that it be discussed and acted upon individually as part of the Regular Agenda. B Consideration of the minutes from November 3, 2015 and the November 17, 2015 meeting. C Consideration and possible action on a Final Plat for 48.17 acres in the Joseph Fish Survey, being Lakeside Subdivision Phase 1, located at 4846, 4844, and 4840 Williams Drive. (Mike Elabarger, Page 1 of 56 Senior Planner) D Consideration and possible action on a Preliminary Final Plat for 10.181 acres in the Burrell Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 216, to be known as Replat Lot A Sun City Boulevard Extension. PFP-2015- 006 (Carolyn Horner, AICP) Legislative Regular Agenda E Public Hearing and possible action on Rezoning from the General Commercial (C-3) District with conditions to the General Commercial (C-3) District for 2.72 acres, being Lot 1 of Fountainwood Plaza, located at 5610 Williams Dr. (REZ-2015-016) Carolyn Horner, AICP **This item has been withdrawn at the applicant's request** F Public Hearing and possible action on a request for Rezoning of 4.0 acres in the Nicholas Porter Survey located at 1308 and 1402 Williams Drive, from Residential Single-family District (RS) to the Local Commercial District (C-1), to be known as Gabriel Bluffs. Mike Elabarger, Senior Planner G Public Hearing and possible action on a request to Rezone 1.641 acres being a portion of Sparks Addition, Blocks 9-10 and 13-15, and abandoned right-of-way, located at 2200 Church Street, from the Residential Single-family (RS) District and Industrial (IN) District to the Low Density Multifamily (MF-1) District. Mike Elabarger, Senior Planner H Discussion Items: Update on the Unified Development Code Advisory Committee (UDCAC) meetings. (Commissioner in Training Bargainer) Update on the Georgetown Transportation Advisory Board (GTAB) meetings. (Commissioner Rankin) Questions or comments from Commissioners-in-Training about the actions and matters considered on this agenda. Reminder of the December 15, 2015, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting in the Council Chambers located at 101 East 7th Street, starting at 6:00 pm. CERTIFICATE OF POSTING I, Shelley Nowling, City Secretary for the City of Georgetown, Texas, do hereby certify that this Notice of Meeting was posted at City Hall, 113 E. 8th Street, a place readily accessible to the general public at all times, on the ______ day of __________________, 2015, at __________, and remained so posted for at least 72 continuous hours preceding the scheduled time of said meeting. ____________________________________ Shelley Nowling, City Secretary Page 2 of 56 City of Georgetown, Texas Planning and Zoning December 1, 2015 SUBJECT: Consideration of the minutes from November 3, 2015 and the November 17, 2015 meeting. ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: NA SUBMITTED BY: ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Draft Minutes from the November 17, 2015 P&Z meeting. Cover Memo Draft Minutes from the November 3, 2017 P&Z meeting Cover Memo Page 3 of 56 Page 1 of 7 City of Georgetown, Texas Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes Tuesday, November 17, 2015 at 6:00 PM Council Chambers 101 E. Seventh Street, Georgetown, Texas 78626 Commissioners: Josh Schroeder, Chair; Scott Rankin, Secretary; Andy Webb, Alex Fuller, John Marler, Kaylah McCord Commissioner(s) Absent: Kevin Pitts, Vice-Chair Commissioners in Training: Jay Warren, Tim Bargainer Commissioner(s) in Training Absent: Staff Present: Sofia Nelson, Planning Director, Jordan Maddox, Principal Planner, Long Range; Valerie Kreger, Principal Planner; Mike Elabarger, Senior Planner; Carolyn Horner, Planner, Juan Enriquez, Planner and Stephanie McNickle, Recording Secretary. Chair Schroeder called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Chair Schroeder stated the order of the meeting and that those who speak must turn in a speaker form to the recording secretary before the item that they wish to address begins. Each speaker is permitted to address the Commission once for each item, for a maximum of three (3) minutes, unless otherwise agreed to before the meeting begins. A. Ross Hunter wishes to speak to the Commission regarding procedures for public comments. Mr. Hunter encourages the Commission to value the evidence and testimony being presented this evening. Mr. Hunter voiced concerns which he will review later this evening. Consent Agenda The Statutory Consent Agenda includes non-controversial and routine items that may be acted upon with one single vote. An item may be pulled from the Consent Agenda in order that it be discussed and acted upon individually as part of the Regular Agenda. B Consideration of the minutes from October 20, 2015. C Consideration and possible action on a Preliminary Plat for 18.81 acres in the Stubblefield Survey to be known as SH29E Park, located at 5030 & 5100 Hwy 29. (PP-2015-015) Carolyn Horner, AICP, Planner D Consideration and possible action on a Preliminary Final Plat for 0.919 acres in the Frederick Foy Survey, to be known as Sun City Pedernales Falls Drive Bridge. (PFP-2015-003) Carolyn Horner, AICP, Planner Page 4 of 56 Page 2 of 7 Motion by Commissioner Marler to approve the Consent agenda including the minutes from the October 20, 2015 Planning and zoning meeting. Second by Commissioner Webb. Approved. (6-0) Legislative Regular Agenda At this time Chair Schroeder moved Item E to the end of the agenda. F Consideration and possible action on Rezoning from the General Commercial (C- 3) District with conditions to the General Commercial (C-3) District for 2.72 acres, being Lot 1 of Fountainwood Plaza, located at 5610 Williams Dr. (REZ-2015-016) Carolyn Horner, AICP, Planner **Item postponed to the December 1st meeting** G Public Hearing and possible action on a request to rezone Lots 1 & 2, Block 9, of the Glasscock Addition, located at 224 E. 8th Street and known as The Union on Eighth, from the Mixed-Use Downtown (MUDT) District with conditions to the Mixed-Use Downtown (MUDT) District (without conditions). (REZ-2015-014) Valerie Kreger, AICP, Principal Planner **Item postponed to December 15th meeting at request of applicant** H Public Hearing and possible action on an amendment to a Special Use Permit at 224 E. 8th Street, being Lots 1 & 2, Block 9, of the Glasscock Addition, for an event facility, known as The Union on Eighth, in the Mixed-Use Downtown (MUDT) District. (SUP-2015-001) Valerie Kreger, AICP, Principal Planner **Item postponed to the December 15th meeting at the request of the applicant** I Public Hearing and possible action on a request to Rezone 0.132 acres of the Coffee Addition,Track A, Block 20, located at 2103 San Jose Street, from Local Commercial (C-1) District to Residential Single-Family (RS) District. (REZ-2015- 017) Juan Enriquez, Planner Juan Enriquez provided an overview of the Rezone request, description of project and recommends approval to City Council. Chair Schroeder invited the applicant to speak. The applicant was not present. Chair Schroeder opened the Public Hearing. No one came forward, the Public Hearing was closed. Motion by Commissioner Fuller to recommend to City Council approval for a request to Rezone 0.132 acres of the Coffee Addition, Track A, Block 20, located Page 5 of 56 Page 3 of 7 at 2103 San Jose Street, from Local Commercial (C-1) District to Residential Single-Family (RS) District. Second by Commissioner Webb. Approved. (6-0) J Public Hearing and possible action on a request to Rezone 2.86 acres being Reata East, Block B, Lot 4, located at 706 Lakeway Drive, from High Density Multifamily (MF-2) District to Townhouse (TH) District. (REZ-2015-018) Juan Enriquez, Planner Juan Enriquez provided an overview of the Rezone request, description of project and recommends approval to City Council. Chair Schroeder invited the applicant to speak. Chris Dosey, applicant stated, staff has done a good job explaining and will be glad to answer questions. Chair Schroeder opened the Public Hearing. No one came forward, the Public Hearing was closed. Motion by Commissioner McCord to recommend to City Council approval for a request to Rezone 2.86 acres being Reata East, Block B, Lot 4, located at 706 Lakeway Drive, from High Density Multifamily (MF-2) District to Townhouse (TH) District. Second by Commissioner Fuller. (6-0) K Discussion and possible action regarding the potential Planning and Zoning meeting schedule for the 2016 calendar year. Motion by Commissioner Fuller to approve the 2016 P&Z Calendar including the cancelation of the January 5, 2016 and the March 15, 2015 Planning and Zoning meetings. Second by Commissioner Marler. Approved. (6-0) L Discussion Items: • Update on the Unified Development Code Advisory Committee (UDCAC) meetings.(Commissioner in Training Bargainer) NA • Update on the Georgetown Transportation Advisory Board (GTAB) meetings. (Commissioner Rankin) NA • Questions or comments from Commissioners-in-Training about the actions and matters considered on this agenda. NA • Reminder of the December 1, 2015, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting in the Council Chambers located at 101 East 7th Street, starting at 6:00 pm. At this time Chair Schroeder recused himself and the Commission voted on Commissioner Webb to chair the meeting. Page 6 of 56 Page 4 of 7 E Consideration and possible action on a request to Rezone 1.18 acres in the Dimmit Addition located at 605 East University Ave., to be known as College View Apartments, from the Local Commercial (C-1) District to 0.1607 acre of the Residential Single-family (RS) District and 1.018 acres for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) District with a High Density Multifamily (MF-2) base zoning district. (REZ-2015-009) Mike Elabarger, Senior Planner Mike Elabarger, Senior Planner provided an overview of what was reviewed during the November 3rd Planning and Zoning meeting. Mr. Elabarger also explained the definition of a Planned Unit Development and stated the applicant has met the criteria. Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner, discussed the history of the application being presented to HARC. Reviewed the updated design. Applicant presented updated design after discussing with some of the neighbors. Matt also reviewed over the height, the brick and the articulation of the building. Design is more contemporary. Staff feels the design creates a more contemporary feel. Staff looked at the overall design and recommends approval. Lee McIntosh, applicant stated staff has cover everything we discussed. Staff has been working on this project for over a year. PUD has existing conditions which is being met as staff recommends. Mr. McIntosh stated the property has been sitting vacant off and on for 25 years. Mr. McIntosh stated he respects the neighbors and tried to accommodate them and feel this is a good project for the neighborhood. Commissioners asked and staff stated the Commissioners may recommend request to this PUD application. Commissioners ask and staff reviewed over the several PUD’s in the downtown area. Commissioner Webb asked if there is anyone who wishes to comment on this item. Larry Olsen, 300 E. 9th Street, read the actual wording for the overlay district. He also stated he is architect and has done urban planning in the United States and has been involved with historic projects. He ask for the Commission to determine if this project is unique to the downtown area. It is an apartment complex and not unique to the downtown area. He also stated there is a specific zoning for apartments and ask for the Commission to deny this application. Larry Brundidge, 908 S. Pine stated the project can be better. Mr. Brundidge complimented staff and informed the Commissioners they can make changes to the PUD application. Page 7 of 56 Page 5 of 7 Tom Harding, 703 E. 11th stated he is concerned with the size and parking will be terrible. Concern with sewer lines, drainage and trash. Sherry Dana, 1101 Walnut St. stated Georgetown is on the list for being the best place to visit and start a business. Ms. Dana stated the application does not fit the area. Dotty Westerfield, 1408 Laurel St. asked why not build a 32 apartment complex on a different property? Property needs to be assessed for water and wastewater. Parking is a concern. Gretchen Johnson, 1102 Pine St. stated, she does not have an issue with apartments. However, 32 units is too high for this property. She is also concerned with drainage. Lawrence Romero, 601 S. Elm is in favor of the project and is a member of the Historical and Architectural Review Committee. He feels it is an appropriate development and feels this is an opportunity for rental property for students who will be able to walk to school. Peter Dana, 1101 Walnut is opposed to the project and feels it will look like a hotel. Susan Firth, 1403 Olive is the President of the Georgetown Heritage Society and questioned if this project the right fit for the property. Pam Mitchell, 1017 South College stated there is a lack of compliance of the Unified Development Code and questions the impervious coverage and drainage. Annette Montgomery, 1604 Mimosa St, stated she is a realtor in Georgetown and her clients feel Georgetown is charming. However, there is nothing charming regarding this project. She is also opposed to the height of the building. Richard Cutts, 1312 Elm St., stated the building is too high and traffic concerns. He hopes the Commission will deny the application. Vicki Stubbington, 203 W. Central Drive, stated the developer is only trying to maximize his profit. Concerned with headlight in neighbors windows from the parking lot. Matthew Dula, 1408 E. 15th St., stated he is against the development and questions the impervious coverage. He also stated there is not enough storm drains and it goes against the design overlay historic features. Page 8 of 56 Page 6 of 7 Ross Hunter, 908 S. Walnut, stated there are several major variances the applicant is requesting with this application and needs to be exceptional reasons for the variances. Mr. Hunter also stated the applicant is said the building plans are un-tweakable and he trying to make money. He also questions the impervious coverage of the project. Sarah Milburn, 407 S. Myrtle St., stated old town is the jewel of the area. Ms. Milburn stated she is not against multi-family, only the size of the project and asks the Commissioners to deny the project as presented. Seeing no one who signed up to comment on this item; Commissioner Webb stated the Commission will now receive response from staff and the applicant. The Commission asked for information regarding the impervious coverage. The applicant stated impervious coverage is state mandated and not city. He also stated it is a TCEQ issue and TCEQ will receive the civil engineers report and will be determined based on the report the impervious cover. The applicant stated they will be using permeable pavers to help the trees. The applicant stated they are compliant to state law and compliant to staffs request. The Commission asked and staff stated if the applicant would like to change his application from a C-1 Zoning to MF-2 Zoning, the applicant would follow the standards and codes for a MF-2 Zoning and would give the applicant a “by-right development. Staff also stated the applicant would be able to apply for a Certificate of Appropriateness with HARC if additional height is requested. The applicant explained to the Commission what part of the existing building will be used for the project. The applicant explained the rental situation and does not want to cause problems for the neighbors or himself. Motion by Commissioner Marler to recommend to City Council approval of the request to Rezone 1.18 acres in the Dimmit Addition located at 605 East University Ave., to be known as College View Apartments, from the Local Commercial (C-1) District to 0.1607 acre of the Residential Single-family (RS) District and 1.018 acres for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) District with a High Density Multifamily (MF-2) base zoning district and using the elevation and floors plans as proposed by staff. Motion failed for a lack of Second. Motion by Commissioner Fuller to recommend to City Council approval of the request to Rezone 1.18 acres in the Dimmit Addition located at 605 East University Ave., to be known as College View Apartments, from the Local Commercial (C-1) District to 0.1607 acre of the Residential Single-family (RS) Page 9 of 56 Page 7 of 7 District and denial of the1.018 acres for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) District with a High Density Multifamily (MF-2) base zoning district. Motion failed for a lack of Second. Motion by Kaylah the commission recommend approval of the proposed single family zoning for the 7,000 square foot lot, and the proposed PUD for the remaining 1.018 acres be approved only on condition that the number of units correspond to MF-2 standards, meaning 24 units, per acre, the building height be limited to what is required by the Old Town overlay district of 30 feet and the parking remain at the current capacity of 61 parking lots or slightly reduced. Second by Commissioner Rankin. Approved. (3-2) Marler, Fuller opposed. Motion to adjourn at 8:23 p.m. __________________________________ _______________________________ Josh Schroeder, Chair Scott Rankin, Secretary Page 10 of 56 Page 1 of 7 City of Georgetown, Texas Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes Tuesday, November 3, 2015 at 6:00 PM Council Chambers 101 E. Seventh Street, Georgetown, Texas 78626 Commissioners: Josh Schroeder, Chair; Scott Rankin, Secretary; Kevin Pitts, Vice- Chair, Andy Webb, Alex Fuller Commissioner(s) Absent: Kaylah McCord, John Marler Commissioners in Training: Jay Warren, Tim Bargainer Commissioner(s) in Training Absent: Staff Present: Sofia Nelson, Planning Director, Jordan Maddox, Principal Planner, Valerie Kreger, Principal Planner; Mike Elabarger, Senior Planner; Carolyn Horner, Planner, David Munk, Utility Engineer and Tammy Glanville, Recording Secretary. Chair Schroeder called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Chair Schroeder stated the order of the meeting and that those who speak must turn in a speaker form to the recording secretary before the item that they wish to address begins. Each speaker is permitted to address the Commission once for each item, for a maximum of three (3) minutes, unless otherwise agreed to before the meeting begins. A. As of the deadline for this agenda, no persons were signed up to speak on items other than what was posted on the agenda. Consent Agenda B. Consideration of the minutes from October 20, 2015. Motion by Commissioner Pitts to approve the minutes from the October 20, 2015 Planning and Zoning meeting. Second by Commissioner Webb. Approved. (5-0) Legislative Regular Agenda C Possible action on a request for Rezoning of 4.89 acres in the Nicholas Porter Survey, Abstract 497, located at 1402 and 1502 Williams Drive, from the Local Commercial District (C-1) and Residential Single-family District (RS) to a Planned Unit Development District (PUD) with a base district of the Local Commercial District (C-1), to be known as Gabriel Bluffs. (REZ-2015-008) Mike Elabarger, Senior Planner, and Sofia Nelson, CNU-A, Planning Director Page 11 of 56 Page 2 of 7 Item postponed at the request of the applicant. D Public Hearing and possible action on a Rezoning from the Agriculture (AG) District to the Low Density Multifamily (MF-1) District for 25.03 acres in the Perry Survey located at 650 FM 971. (REZ-2015-012) Carolyn Horner, AICP Carolyn Horner provided an overview of the Rezoning request, description of project and recommends for approval. Chair Schroeder invited the applicant to speak. The applicant stated they will be glad to answer any questions. Chair Schroeder opened the Public Hearing. Llorente Navarrette, 229 Bastian Lane – is opposed to the project due to the significant impact of life it would have on an established single family subdivision namely Katy Crossing. He stated the current roadway does not support vehicles and bikes. He would like to keep the dense population away from our parks (San Gabriel). Chair Schroeder closed the Public Hearing. Discussion between Commissioners and staff regarding enhancements and widening of FM 971. Motion by Commissioner Fuller to recommend to City Council approval of a request to rezone from the Agriculture (AG) District to the Low Density Multifamily (MF-1) District for 25.03 acres in the Perry Survey located at 650 FM 971. Second by Commissioner Webb. Approved. (5-0) E. Public Hearing and possible action on Rezoning from the General Commercial (C-3) District with conditions to the General Commercial (C-3) District for 2.72 acres, being Lot 1 of Fountainwood Plaza, located at 5610 Williams Dr. (REZ- 2015-016) Carolyn Horner, AICP Carolyn Horner provided an overview of the Rezone request, description of project and recommended Commissioners hold the public hearing and postpone action to the next regularly-scheduled P&Z meeting. Chair Schroeder invited the applicant to speak. Andrew Holden, Real Estate Rep, representing the applicant stated they will be glad to answer any questions. Mr. Holden clarified the project will be a corner store approximately 5,650 sq. ft. with the fuel brand name Valero. Page 12 of 56 Page 3 of 7 Chair Schroeder opened the Public Hearing. No one came forward, the Public Hearing was closed. Discussion between commissioners and staff regarding State mandated notification requirements and possibly future notification to neighborhoods surrounding future developments in the (ETJ) Extra Territorial Jurisdiction. Commissioners asked and staff explained zoning General Commercial (C-3) with conditions and Local Commercial (C-1) fuel sales. Motion by Commissioner Pitts to postpone item E to the next regular Planning and Zoning meeting scheduled for November 17th. Second by Commissioner Webb. Approved. (5-0) F. Public Hearing and possible action on a Rezoning from the Residential Single- family District (RS) to the Low Density Multifamily District (MF-1) for Lot 2 of the Osgood Subdivision, located at 401 West 17th Street. (REZ-2015-013) Mike Elabarger, Senior Planner Mike Elabarger provided an overview of the Rezone request, description of project and recommended denial. Chair Schroeder invited the applicant to speak. Tom Watts, applicant representing the owner gave a brief review the project. Chair Schroeder opened the Public Hearing. Natalie Byrd, 1607 Forest Street, is concerned with increase traffic and safety for her children in the single family neighborhood. Mike Berens, 601 W. 17th Street, is concerned about traffic and would rather it be a parking lot for downtown. Terry Edelmon, 511 W. 17th Street, voiced his concerns with existing traffic issues on 17th street and how the road needs to be widened to accommodate any additional traffic. Chair Schroeder closed the Public Hearing. Commissioner commended staff on presentation. Motion by Commissioner Pitts to recommend to City Council denial of the request to Rezoning from the Residential Single-family District (RS) to the Low Page 13 of 56 Page 4 of 7 Density Multifamily District (MF-1) for Lot 2 of the Osgood Subdivision, located at 401 West 17th Street for the primary reason of the non-study of the Utilities. Second by Commissioner Fuller. Approved. (5-0) Motion by Commissioner Pitts to take a 15 minute break. Second by Commissioner Fuller. Approved. (5-0) Item G. - At this time Chair Josh Schroeder recused himself from the dais. G. Public Hearing and possible action on a request to Rezone 1.18 acres in the Dimmit Addition located at 605 East University Ave., to be known as College View Apartments, from the Local Commercial (C-1) District to 0.1607 acre of the Residential Single-family (RS) District and 1.018 acres for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) District with a High Density Multifamily (MF-2) base zoning district. Mike Elabarger provided an overview of the Rezone request, description of project and recommends for approval. Staff asked Commissioners to hold the public hearing and postpone action to the next regularly-scheduled P&Z meeting. Vice-Chair Pitts invited the applicant to address the Commission. Lee McIntosh applicant, gave a brief presentation. Discussion between the Commissioners and staff regarding HARC’s decision declining the architectural design of the property to City Council. In addition, discussed building height, setbacks and dwelling units. Vice-Chair Pitts opened the Public Hearing. Pamela Mitchell, 1017 S. College was ceded time from Dottie Westerfield. Opposed. She has concerns based on the inconsistency with the Georgetown Historic Overlay District along with the City of Georgetown Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Code guidelines. Mitchell also expressed concerns with increased traffic and congestion creating safety issues. Additional concerns were setback and height issues with no justification for all the variances and indicated the size is too big. Ross Hunter, 908 S. Walnut Street was ceded time from Robert Phipps. Opposed. Wants to clarify the property is not in the Gateway Overlay it’s in the Old Town Overlay. Hunter, stated Gateway does not control “Old Town Overlay” controls. Hunter, explained HARC’s decision by stating they did not turn down architectural matters HARC turned down and sited design guideline requirements. Hunter stated HARC guidelines don’t mean “should” they mean “shall”. He explained they are regulations that must be followed unless there is an exception given and HARC had good reasons for turning it down. Hunter expressed PUD’s are a mechanism to hid “variances” and there are no reasons for the variances. He Page 14 of 56 Page 5 of 7 voiced concerns with impervious coverage, setback, height and the project is 30% too big. Susan Firth, 1403 Olive Street, was ceded time from Lawrence Romero. Opposed. Had concerns with the infill of construction and does not support the intent of the PUD as proposed. She also feels the project oversteps guidelines and codes. Peter Dana, 1101 Walnut, was ceded time from Sherry Dana. Opposed. Dana, stated downtown does not need new Urbanism. He feels rezoning should have public benefits and is concerned with the height. Kelly Gerry, 803 S. College Street. Opposed. Voiced concerns with the development and wants to protect the integrity of old town. He’s also concerned with the appearance of the building, location, height and lack of setback. Gerry, stated it’s a college apartment that will bring in transients and although we love college students there’s a place for that, but not in Old Town. Angela Litterski, 603 E. 8th Street. Opposed. Is concerned with the thought of a 3- story apartment complex for college students. She expressed it will ruin the whole effect of old town Georgetown. Vicki Stubbington, 203 West Central Drive. Opposed. She is concerned this development will bring in transients to our community and stated MF-2 should be on a major thoroughfare. Richard Cutts, 1312 Elm Street. Opposed. He expressed issues with the height of the proposed building and concerns with density, setbacks, parking, and potential traffic. He stated it’s too close to street. Henri Knipper, 710 E. 8th Street. Opposed. The current roadway and traffic is unsafe. Knipper, stated he had rules to abide by when he built his picket fence regarding how tall it should be and others should follow the rules. Andrew Solin, 406 S. Main Street. Opposed. Expressed we’ve spent so much time, energy and money creating the UDC-Unified Development Code to build a great town for people to live. Solin, stated why break the rules and go against the UDC. He feels the structure is not appropriate for the space and will set a bad precedent if we make exceptions. David Roberts, 1303 Olive Street. Opposed. Just moved to the area and learned new information like the UDC. Doesn’t understand why this decision needs to be delayed. No tweaking is going to fix this. He feels we need to send a message to the City Council and everyone else that has a decision to be made including Lee McIntosh. Ercel Brashear, 2995 Dawn Drive, represents the Georgetown Health Care. He stated he has history of redevelopments that could transform the property and will convert it to something new. Page 15 of 56 Page 6 of 7 Jim Elliott, 1102 S. Walnut Street, has lived in Georgetown since 1978 and has seen change. The hospital is the devil he knows however he’s unsure about the devil he’s going to get with this project. He feels the proposed structure doesn’t say “Georgetown” it says “Austin”. He’s other concerns are noise, traffic and lights. Elliott, asked Commissioners if this was going to be built near your home how would you feel about it? John Graves, 711 E. University Ave, Developers, Real Estate Brokers – Believes in rezoning however, not when there’s a profit to be made at public’s expense. Design looks like governmental assistance housing. Concerned with traffic, noise, height and safety for kids riding bikes on University. Misty Adair, 1204 E University Ave, appreciates Lee McIntosh trying to find a new use for that property however, there has to be some other options. She opposes the scale and density of the project for the neighborhood. Debi Guardado, 523 B Luther Drive, stated City Council has ordinance in place to follow the rules. Mr. Guardado, thanked Lee for trying to do something with the property but feels there has to be another use that would be an asset to the community. Caroline Knipper, 904 Walnut Street, voiced concerns with current traffic issues, no sidewalks or drainage, on Walnut and Pine Street. Knipper, stated approving this proposal will only create more of a problem and no one is addressing the traffic issues on Hwy 29 now. Kay Vossler, 409 E. 10th Street, stated her fear is going to be a party central with a bunch of college kids. Vice-Chair Pitts closed the public hearing. Applicant Response to Speakers – Lee McIntosh addressed commissioners and answered questions. Discussion between Commissioners’ and staff regarding possibility of a flat roof or reducing dwelling units. Commissioner’s questioned why postpone item and staff responded there is refining that needs to be done and staff is requesting Commissioner’s provide applicant feedback and direction on aspects of the development. Motion by Commissioner Fuller to deny request. Motion died for lack of 2nd Motion by Commissioner Webb to postpone the item to the next regular Planning and Zoning meeting scheduled for November 17th. Second by Commissioner Rankin. Approved. (3-1) Commissioner Fuller opposed. H. Discussion Items: Chair Schroeder was absent from discussion items. Page 16 of 56 Page 7 of 7 • Update on the Unified Development Code Advisory Committee (UDCAC) meetings. (Commissioner in Training Bargainer) Commissioner Bargainer gave a brief update on recommended UDC amendments for 2015-2016 review period; future amendments to Chapter 12 – Pedestrian and Vehicle Circulation and Chapter 13 – Infrastructure and Public Improvements; and a brief overview of proposed changes to the Development Fee Schedule for development related applications • Update on the Georgetown Transportation Advisory Board (GTAB) meetings. (Commissioner Rankin) N/A • Questions or comments from Commissioners-in-Training about the actions and matters considered on this agenda. N/A • Reminder to review the Calendar for 2016 which will be voted on during the November 17, 2015 P&Z meeting. • Reminder of the November 17, 2015, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting in the Council Chambers located at 101 East 7th Street, starting at 6:00 pm. Adjourned at 9:02 p.m. __________________________________ _______________________________ Josh Schroeder, Chair Scott Rankin, Secretary Page 17 of 56 City of Georgetown, Texas Planning and Zoning December 1, 2015 SUBJECT: Consideration and possible action on a Final Plat for 48.17 acres in the Joseph Fish Survey, being Lakeside Subdivision Phase 1, located at 4846, 4844, and 4840 Williams Drive. (Mike Elabarger, Senior Planner) ITEM SUMMARY: Background: The applicant proposes a Final Plat of the first phase of the Lakeside subdivision, which was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission as Preliminary Plat 2014-012 on January 20, 2015. The entire subdivision proposes 305 single-family lots and three (3) commercial lots across 116 acres, with two public parkland lots, with improvements, totaling almost five acres. Phase One entails 113 single-family lots, the three (3) commercial lots, one parkland lot, and several other water detention/open space lots. During the interim period between approval of the Preliminary Plat and the submission of the Phase One Final Plat, the applicant identified and sought the following changes (deviations) from which was approved through the Preliminary Plat: 1.) an increase of 4 residential lots due to the permission of the state TCEQ to reduce the size of a Karst feature buffer; 2.) creation of an additional open space lot which would act as a pedestrian connection from Lake Spring Circle to the grounds of Ford Elementary School; 3.) a revision to the Plat note regarding the calculation of impervious coverage on the individual residential lots; and 4.) a note commemorating the timing of payment of the road impact fees for the commercial lots as determined in the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA-2014-003). Staff’s review of the Final Plat application determined that these changes from the approved Preliminary Plat qualified as a Major Deviation from that plat, as described in UDC Section 3.08.080(B.)(c.)(ii.), which requires the Final Plat to be forwarded to the Planning and Zoning Commission for consideration and final action. Like Preliminary Plats, public notice, notification letters, and posting of the property is not required for this procedure. The Final Plat has received a thorough review and been approved by staff for recordation. Public Comment: Public notice is not required for a Final Plat application of this nature. There have been no comments received to date. Recommended Motion: Approval of a Final Plat of 48.17 in the Joseph Fish Survey, Abstract 232, to be known as Lakeside Subdivision Phase One. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. The applicant has paid the required fees. Page 18 of 56 SUBMITTED BY: Mike Elabarger, Senior Planner and Sofia Nelson, CNU-A, Planning Director ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Exhibit 1 - Location Map Backup Material Exhibit 2 - Aerial Map Backup Material Exhibit 3 - Lakeside Phase 1 Final Plat Backup Material Page 19 of 56 C I T Y O F G E O R G E T O W N G e o r g e t o w n E T J G e o r g e t o w n E T J P E N N Y L N RE D G R A NITE R D CED A R LA KE BLVD T E R I C T WOODSTOC K DR N O R T H F O R K T RL W OODLAKEDR T B D 5 9 WILDWOOD D R A C K E R R D GATLIN CREEK BLVD L A K E S I D E R A N C H R D C E D A R L A K E B L V D M O R E L A N D D R CAPR O C K C A N Y O N T R L L E A N N E D R L A K E C A V E R N C T W AKE LN W IN D H O L L O W D R CLIFFWOODDR S AIL WIN D W A Y LAKE RI M CIR S E D R O T R L R O CK DO C K R D L A K E S P R I N G C I R LIM E S T O NE LAKEDR WILLIAMSDR O L D E O A K D R FP -2015 -032 Exhibit #1 Co ord inate Sys tem: Texas S tat e P lane/C entral Zone/NAD 83 /US FeetCartographic Data For Genera l Planning Purposes Onl y 0 1,000 2,000Fee t ¯ Le ge nd SiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ D el W e b b B l v d WilliamsDr DB W o o d R d Shell Rd ShellRd S e d r o T rl Site City Lim its Str eet Si te ³ FP-2015-032 Page 20 of 56 P E N N Y L N M ORELAND DR N O R T H F O R K T R L R ED G R ANITE R D C E D A R LA K E BLV D T E R I C T W O O D S T O C K D R W O O D L A K E D R T B D 5 9 WILDWOOD DR A C K E R R D GATLIN CREEK BLVD LA K E SID E R A N C H R D S E D R O T R L LE A N N E D R L A K E C A V E R N C T W IN D H O LL O W D R W AKE LN S P R I N G W A T E R L N CLIFFW OOD DR L A K E R I M C I R S AIL W IN D W A Y R E D P O P P Y T R L ROCK DOCK RD L A K E S P RIN G CIR WILLIAMS DR LIMESTONE LAKE DR O L D E O A K D R Le ge ndSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ Co ord inate Sys tem: Texas S tat e P lane/Central Zone/NAD 83 /US FeetCartographic Data For Genera l Planning Purposes Onl y ¯ 0 1,000 2,000 Feet Exhibit #4 FP -2015 -032 D el W e b b B l v d WilliamsDr D B W o o d R d Shell Rd S e d r o T rl Site City Lim its Str eet Si te ³ FP-2015-032 Page 21 of 56 Page 22 of 56 Page 23 of 56 Page 24 of 56 Page 25 of 56 Page 26 of 56 Page 27 of 56 City of Georgetown, Texas Planning and Zoning December 1, 2015 SUBJECT: Consideration and possible action on a Preliminary Final Plat for 10.181 acres in the Burrell Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 216, to be known as Replat Lot A Sun City Boulevard Extension. PFP-2015- 006 (Carolyn Horner, AICP) ITEM SUMMARY: Background: The applicant proposes to replat Lot A of the Final Plat of Sun City Boulevard Extension (East) plat to dedicate a portion of the future Cattleman Drive to connect with Sun City Boulevard. The effect of this replat will create 2 open space lots out of the existing 1 lot and create new right-of- way to the new Sun City expansion area. Public Comments: Public notice is not required for this type of plat application. There have been no public comments received at the time of this report. Recommended Motion: The proposed plat meets the requirements of the Unified Development Code and is recommended for approval. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. The applicant has paid the required fees. SUBMITTED BY: Carolyn Horner, AICP and Sofia Nelson, CNU-A, Director ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Staff Report Cover Memo Exhibit 1 - Location Map Backup Material Exhibit 2 Backup Material Page 28 of 56 Georgetown Planning Department Staff Report Sun City, Replat Lot A Sun City Boulevard Extension, Preliminary Final Plat Page 1 of 3 Report Date: November 25, 2015 File No: PFP-2015-006 Project Planner: Carolyn Horner, AICP, Planner Item Details Project Name: Replat Lot A Sun City Boulevard Extension Project Address: 140 Sun City Boulevard Location: Sun City Boulevard, east of State Highway 195 Total Acreage: 10.181 acres Legal Description: 10.181 acres in the Burrell Eaves Survey, Abstract 216 Applicant: Bryan Moore, P.E., Steger and Bizzell Property Owner: Pulte Homes of Texas, L.P. Contact: Bryan Moore, P.E. Proposed Lots: 2 new lots plus right-of-way Streets Proposed: 1 new street Parkland: None for right-of-way plat Heritage Trees: None Existing Use: Vacant land, open space Existing Zoning: Planned Unit Development Growth Tier: Tier 1B Applicant’s Request The applicant proposes to replat Lot A of the Final Plat of Sun City Boulevard Extension (East) plat to dedicate a portion of the future Cattleman Drive to connect with Sun City Boulevard. The effect of this replat will create 2 open space lots out of the existing 1 lot and create new right-of-way to the new Sun City expansion area. Site Information Location: The new right-of-way is located in the middle of what is currently Lot A of the Final Plat of Sun City Boulevard Extension (East). The overall property location is adjacent to State Highway 195, the far east portion of the Sun City development. Physical Characteristics: Currently, Lot A is Open Space and Drainage Easement, as dedicated on the original final plat. The open space is undeveloped, originally providing a buffer between the new Sun City Boulevard and the undeveloped property to the south. History The property was annexed and zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD) in 2005 with Ordinance 2005-57. This PUD continued the regulations of Sun City Georgetown over the new property. The property was originally platted as Lot A of the Final Plat of Sun City Boulevard Extension (East), designated as Open Space and Drainage Easement. The plat was recorded at the Williamson County Clerk’s Office in November, 2008. Page 29 of 56 Planning Department Staff Report Sun City, Replat Lot A Sun City Boulevard Extension, Preliminary Final Plat Page 2 of 3 Sun City has since expanded to the south of this property, and a connection is necessary between the existing Sun City Boulevard and the new neighborhoods. 2030 Plan Conformance The proposed Preliminary Plat is in conformance with the 2030 Plan land use designation of Moderate Density Residential. This project is located within Growth Tier 1B. Tier 1B is the area within the present city limits, or subject to a development agreement, surrounding Tier 1A that is generally under-served by infrastructure and where service and facilities will likely be needed to meet the growth needs of the city. Utilities Utilities will be provided by City of Georgetown electric, water and wastewater. Public utility easements are being dedicated with this plat according to the City of Georgetown standards. It is anticipated that there is adequate capacity to serve this property either by existing capacity or developer participation in upgrades to infrastructure. Transportation This roadway plat will provide access to surroundings areas, and must be constructed prior to the development of future Sun City neighborhoods on the land previously known as the “Queen Tract”. Future Application(s) The Preliminiary/Final Plat is an application that allows for the combination of the Preliminary and Final Plats where an administrative plat requires dedication of utilities or land (future Cattleman Drive in this instance). The combined application follows the procedure for approval of a Preliminary Plat, but also receives Final Plat approval and may be recorded. The following applications will be processed separately:  Construction plans for the proposed road segment Staff Analysis Staff Recommendation and Basis: The proposed p lat meets the requirements of the Unified Development Code and is recommended for approval. Interdepartmental, Governmental and Agency Comments None Public Comments Public notice is not required for this type of plat application. There have been no public comments received at the time of this report. Proposed Meetings Schedule December 1, 2015 – Planning and Zoning Commission Page 30 of 56 Planning Department Staff Report Sun City, Replat Lot A Sun City Boulevard Extension, Preliminary Final Plat Page 3 of 3 Attachments Exhibit 1 – Location Map Exhibit 2 – Preliminary Plat Page 31 of 56 C I T Y O F G E O R G E T O W N GeorgetownETJ G e o r g eto w n E TJ Georgetown ETJ PF P -2 01 5-0 06 SH 195 SUN CITY B L V D O A K B R A N C H D R B O N N E T L N WOOD CV GRAN I T E P E A K C V TIMBERHITCHCT O A K B R E E Z E C V CHERR Y W O O D C T CR 14 7 T E N O A K S D R PFP-2 015-0 06 Exhibit #1 Co ord inate Sys tem: Texas S ta te Plane/Centra l Zone/NAD 83/U S FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only 0 1,000 2,000Fee t ¯ Le ge n d SiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ ¬«195 SunCity B l v d ¬«195 Site City Limits Str eet Si te ³ Page 32 of 56 GEORGETOWN, TX 78626 STEGERBIZZELL.COM >>ENGINEERS >>PLANNERS >>SURVEYORS 512.930.9412 SERVICES METRO ADDRESS 1978 S. AUSTIN AVENUE WEB FOR REVIEW. THIS DOCUMENT IS RELEASED FOR THE PURPOSE OF REVIEW UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF BRYAN E. MOORE, P.E. REG. #98920 ON 11/18/15. IT IS NOT TO BE USED FOR BIDDING, PERMIT OR CONSTRUCTION. DRAWN BY: jjh REVIEWED BY:APPROVED BY: LOCATION MAP - 1" = 2000' JOB No. 22226 DATE: SEPTEMBER, 2015 SHEET 1 of 3 Th e s e d r a w i n g s a r e t h e s o l e p r o p e r t y o f S T E G E R B I Z Z E L L . T h e u s e o f t h e s e d r a w i n g s i s h e r e b y r e s t r i c t e d t o t h e o r i g i n a l s i t e f o r w h i c h t h e y w e r e p r e p a r e d . R e p r o d u c t i o n o r r e u s e o f t h e s e d r a w i n g s i n w h o l e o r i n p a r t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n p e r m i s s i o n o f S T E G E R B I Z Z E L L i s s t r i c t l y p r o h i b i t e d . TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-181 TBPLS FIRM No.10003700 REPLAT LOT A FINAL PLAT OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OF SUN CITY GEORGETOWN SUN CITY BOULEVARD EXTENSION LEGEND: Iron Rod Found Iron Rod Set DE Indicates Drainage Easement WLE Indicates Waterline Easement WWE Indicates Wastewater Easement BL Indicates Building Setback Line PUE Indicates Public Utility Easement ELEC E Indicates Electric Easement OAE Indicates Owner's Association Easement O.R.W.C.T. Indicates Official Records of Williamson County, Texas W.C.P.R. Indicates Williamson County Plat Records P.O.B.Indicates Point of Beginning R.O.W.Right-of-Way OWNER: DEL WEBB TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP BY: DEL WEBB SOUTHWEST CO. 9401 AMBERGLEN BLVD., BLDG I, SUITE 150 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78726 ENGINEER: STEGER BIZZELL 1978 S. AUSTIN AVE. GEORGETOWN, TEXAS 78626 SURVEYOR: McKIM & CREED, INC. 8868 RESEARCH BLVD., SUITE 407 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78758 2 LOTS 1 BLOCK 95 LINEAR FEET ROW ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS, PLANNERS 8868 Research Blvd. , Suite 407 Austin, TX 78758 512.916.0224 TBPLS Firm Registration No.101776.01 www.mckimcreed.com PFP-2015-006 L.F. SQ.FT. ACRE DESCRIPTION / USE 95 7,168 0.165 STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY 396,639 9.105 LOT "A-1" OPEN SPACE AND D.E. 39,701 0.911 LOT "A-2" OPEN SPACE AND D.E. 10.181 PROPOSED ACREAGE AND USAGE GENERAL NOTES: 1.Total Acres: 10.181 Ac. 2.Number of Lots: 2 3.Number of Blocks: 1 4. Linear feet of new street: 95 L.F. 5. Proposed use: Open Space, Drainage Easement, Street ROW 6. Electric, water and wastewater shall be provided by the City of Georgetown. 7.A 10 - foot Public Utility Easement is reserved along all street frontages within this plat. 8. All structures/ obstructions are prohibited in drainage easements 9. dŚĞƌĞĂƌĞŶŽĂƌĞĂƐǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞďŽƵŶĚĂƌŝĞƐŽĨƚŚŝƐƐƵďĚŝǀŝƐŝŽŶŝŶƚŚĞϭϬϬͲǇĞĂƌŇŽŽĚƉůĂŝŶ ĂƐĚĞĮŶĞĚďǇ&/ZDDĂƉEƵŵďĞƌϰϴϰϵϭϬϮϴϬ͕ĞĨĨĞĐƚŝǀĞĚĂƚĞŽĨ^ĞƉƚ͘Ϯϲ͕ϮϬϬϴ͘ 10. WƌŝŽƌƚŽĂŶǇĐŚĂŶŶĞůĂůƚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶŽƌďƌŝĚŐĞĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͕ǁŚŝĐŚǁŝůůĐŚĂŶŐĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐŇŽŽĚ patterns or elevations, a Letter of Map Amendment must be submitted to the Williamson County Floodplain Administrator for approval and approval by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. 11. In order to promote drainage away from a structure, the slab elevation should be built at least one-foot above the surrounding ground, and the ground should be graded ĂǁĂǇĨƌŽŵƚŚĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĂƚĂƐůŽƉĞŽĨϭͬϮ͟ƉĞƌĨŽŽƚĨŽƌĂĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨĂƚůĞĂƐƚϭϬĨĞĞƚ͘ 12. Sidewalks shall be provided, owned and maintained in accordance with the approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) District agreement. 13. This tract is located in the Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone. An approved Water Pollution Abatement Plan is required by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality prior to construction. 14. All bearings and coordinates are referenced to the Texas Coordinate System, Central Zone. NAD 83/93 HARN horizontal control datum and NAVD 88 vertical control datum. All coordinates are grid. All distances are surface and may be converted to grid by multiplying by the combined scale factor of 0.999856056. Coordinates are based on Lower Colorado River Authority USGS Benchmark C-1036. Published NAD 83 X=3,133,774.1200, Y=10,218,746.7610, NAVD 88 Elevation = 726.52; Adjusted to NAD 83/93 HARM X=3,133,772.6300, Y= 10,216,744.9310 Elevation = 723.87 15. The landowner assumes all risks associated with improvements located in the right-of-way, or road widening easements. By placing anything in the right-of-way or road widening easements, the landowner indemnifies and holds the City of Georgetown, Williamson County, their officers, agents and employees harmless from any liability owing to property defects or negligence not attributable to them and acknowledges that the improvements may be removed by the City and/or County and that the owner of the improvements will be responsible for the relocation and/or replacement of the improvements. 16. The building of all streets, roads, and other public thoroughfares and any bridges or culverts necessary to be constructed or placed is the responsibility of the owners of the tract of land covered by this plat in accordance with the plans and specifications prescribed by the City of Georgetown and/or Williamson County, Texas. Neither the City of Georgetown nor Williamson County assumes any obligation to build any of the streets, roads, or other public thoroughfares shown on this plat or of constructing any of the bridges or drainage improvements in connection therewith. Neither the City of Georgetown nor Williamson County assume any responsibility for drainage ways or easements in the subdivision, other than those draining or protecting the road system and streets in their respective jurisdictions. 17. Neither the City of Georgetown nor Williamson County assumes any responsibility for the accuracy of representations by other parties in this plat. Floodplain data, in particular, may change depending on subsequent development. It is further understood that the owners of the tract of land covered by this plat must install at their own expense all traffic control devices and signage that may be required before the streets in the subdivision have finally been accepted for maintenance by the City and / or County. 18. Right-of-way easements for widening roadways or improving drainage shall be maintained by the landowner until road or drainage improvements are actually constructed on the property. The City and/or County have the right at any time to take possession of any road widening easement for construction, improvement, or maintenance of the adjacent road. 19. No construction in the subdivision may begin until the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) has approved the Water Pollution Abatement Plan (WPAP) in writing. 20. All open space lots ("A1" and "A2") and landscape easements within the boundaries of this plat will be maintained by the developer or after title transfer the Homeowners Association, purchaser or non-profit corporation. 21. Control monuments as shown: It is the practice of McKim & Creed to monument all corners (If practical) upon completion of construction. Typical monument is a 1/2-Inch iron rod with a "MCKCRD" Plastic Cap. 22. All plat boundary corners are staked with 1/2-Inch iron rods with plastic caps stamped "MCKCRD" unless otherwise indicated. 23. This tract is subject to the City of Georgetown Edward Aquifer Recharge Zone Water Quality (Salamander) Ordinance No. 2013-59 and any amendments thereto. 25. This subdivision is subject to all general notes and restrictions appearing on the plat of Planned Unit Development of Sun City Georgetown, Sun City Boulevard Extension (East) Lot A, recorded in Cabinet FF Slide 171-173 of the Plat Records of Williamson County, Texas. Feet 0 200 400 Page 33 of 56 GEORGETOWN, TX 78626 STEGERBIZZELL.COM >>ENGINEERS >>PLANNERS >>SURVEYORS 512.930.9412 SERVICES METRO ADDRESS 1978 S. AUSTIN AVENUE WEB DRAWN BY: jjh REVIEWED BY:APPROVED BY: Th e s e d r a w i n g s a r e t h e s o l e p r o p e r t y o f S T E G E R B I Z Z E L L . T h e u s e o f t h e s e d r a w i n g s i s h e r e b y r e s t r i c t e d t o t h e o r i g i n a l s i t e f o r w h i c h t h e y w e r e p r e p a r e d . R e p r o d u c t i o n o r r e u s e o f t h e s e d r a w i n g s i n w h o l e o r i n p a r t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n p e r m i s s i o n o f S T E G E R B I Z Z E L L i s s t r i c t l y p r o h i b i t e d . TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-181 TBPLS FIRM No.10003700 0 100 200 SCALE: 1"=100' REPLAT LOT A FINAL PLAT OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OF SUN CITY GEORGETOWN SUN CITY BOULEVARD EXTENSION JOB No. 22226 DATE: SEPTEMBER, 2015 SHEET 2 of 3 ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS, PLANNERS 8868 Research Blvd. , Suite 407 Austin, TX 78758 512.916.0224 TBPLS Firm Registration No.101776.01 www.mckimcreed.com 3/4 - INCH I.R. IN CONCRETE POINT OF BEGINNING N = 10241739.88 E = 3123750.89 PFP-2015-006 MA T C H L I N E MA T C H L I N E Page 34 of 56 GEORGETOWN, TX 78626 STEGERBIZZELL.COM >>ENGINEERS >>PLANNERS >>SURVEYORS 512.930.9412 SERVICES METRO ADDRESS 1978 S. AUSTIN AVENUE WEB DRAWN BY: jjh REVIEWED BY:APPROVED BY: Th e s e d r a w i n g s a r e t h e s o l e p r o p e r t y o f S T E G E R B I Z Z E L L . T h e u s e o f t h e s e d r a w i n g s i s h e r e b y r e s t r i c t e d t o t h e o r i g i n a l s i t e f o r w h i c h t h e y w e r e p r e p a r e d . R e p r o d u c t i o n o r r e u s e o f t h e s e d r a w i n g s i n w h o l e o r i n p a r t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n p e r m i s s i o n o f S T E G E R B I Z Z E L L i s s t r i c t l y p r o h i b i t e d . TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-181 TBPLS FIRM No.10003700 STATE OF TEXAS { KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON { I, Del Webb Limited Partnership, By: Del Webb Southwest CO., owners of the certain tract of land shown hereon ĂŶĚĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚŝŶĂƉůĂƚƌĞĐŽƌĚĞĚŝŶĂďŝŶĞƚ&&͕^ůŝĚĞƐϭϳϭͲϭϳϯŽĨƚŚĞKĨĮĐŝĂůZĞĐŽƌĚƐŽĨtŝůůŝĂŵƐŽŶŽƵŶƚǇ͕ Texas, do hereby resubdivide said tract as shown hereon, and do hereby consent to all plat note requirements shown hereon, and do hereby dedicate to the City of Georgetown the streets, alleys, rights-of-way, easements and public places shown hereon for such public purposes as the City of Georgetown may deem appropriate. This subdivision is to be known as REPLAT LOT A FINAL PLAT OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPEMENT OF SUN CITY GEORGETOWN SUN CITY BOULEVARD EXTENSION. TO CERTIFY WHICH, WITNESS by my hand this ________ day of ______________________ , 2015 . ___________________________ Stephen Ashlock, Director of Land Development Del Webb Limited Partnership, By: Del Webb Southwest CO. 9401 Amberglen Blvd. Bldg I, Suite 150 Austin, Texas 78729 STATE OF TEXAS { KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON { Before me, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared __________________ , known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed, in the capacity therein stated. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL of office this_________ day of _________________________ , 2015 . ___________________________________________ Notary Public in and for the State of Texas My Commission expires on: _________________ I, Bryan E. Moore , Registered Professional Engineer in the State of Texas, do hereby certify that this subdivision ŝƐŝŶƚŚĞĚǁĂƌĚƐƋƵŝĨĞƌZĞĐŚĂƌŐĞŽŶĞĂŶĚŝƐŶŽƚĞŶĐƌŽĂĐŚĞĚďǇĂŽŶĞŇŽŽĚĂƌĞĂ͕ĂƐĚĞŶŽƚĞĚŚĞƌĞŝŶ͕ĂŶĚĂƐ ĚĞĮŶĞĚďǇ&ĞĚĞƌĂůŵĞƌŐĞŶĐǇDĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƚŝŽŶ&ůŽŽĚ,ĂǌĂƌĚŽƵŶĚĂƌǇDĂƉ͕ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚǇWĂŶĞů Number 48491C0275E, effective date September 26, 2008, and that each lot conforms to the City of Georgetown regulations.The fully developed, concentrated stormwater runoff resulting from the one hundred (100) year frequency storm is contained within the drainage easements shown and/or public rights-of-way dedicated by this plat. TO CERTIFY WHICH, WITNESS my hand and seal at Georgetown , Williamson County , Texas, this _____ day of_________________ , 2015. __________________________________ Bryan E. Moore Registered Professional Engineer No. 98920 State of Texas JOB No. 22226 DATE: SEPTEMBER, 2015 SHEET 3 of 3 REPLAT LOT A FINAL PLAT OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OF SUN CITY GEORGETOWN SUN CITY BOULEVARD EXTENSION /͕^ŽĨŝĂEĞůƐŽŶ͕WůĂŶŶŝŶŐŝƌĞĐƚŽƌŽĨƚŚĞŝƚǇŽĨ'ĞŽƌŐĞƚŽǁŶ͕dĞǆĂƐ͕ĚŽŚĞƌĞďǇĐĞƌƚŝĨǇƚŚŝƐƉůĂƚŝƐĂƉƉƌŽǀĞĚĨŽƌĮůŝŶŐ of record with the County Clerk of Williamson County, Texas. ______________________________ _______________________ Sofia Nelson, Planning Director Date ĂƐĞĚƵƉŽŶƚŚĞĂďŽǀĞƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶƐŽĨƚŚĞĞŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŽƌƐƵƌǀĞǇŽƌǁŚŽƐĞƐĞĂůŝƐĂĨĮǆĞĚŚĞƌĞƚŽ͕ĂŶĚĂĨƚĞƌƌĞǀŝĞǁ ŽĨƚŚĞƉůĂƚĂƐƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĞĚďǇƚŚĞƐĂŝĚĞŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŽƌƐƵƌǀĞǇŽƌ͕/ĮŶĚƚŚĂƚƚŚŝƐƉůĂƚĐŽŵƉůŝĞƐǁŝƚŚƚŚĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐŽĨ ŚĂƉƚĞƌϭϱ͘ϰϰ͕&ůŽŽĚĂŵĂŐĞWƌĞǀĞŶƚŝŽŶ͕ŽĨƚŚĞŝƚǇŽĨ'ĞŽƌŐĞƚŽǁŶDƵŶŝĐŝƉĂůŽĚĞ͘dŚŝƐĐĞƌƚŝĮĐĂƚŝŽŶŝƐŵĂĚĞ ƐŽůĞůǇƵƉŽŶƐƵĐŚƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶƐĂŶĚƐŚŽƵůĚŶŽƚďĞƌĞůŝĞĚƵƉŽŶĨŽƌǀĞƌŝĮĐĂƚŝŽŶƐŽĨƚŚĞĨĂĐƚƐĂůůĞŐĞĚ͘dŚĞŝƚǇŽĨ 'ĞŽƌŐĞƚŽǁŶĚŝƐĐůĂŝŵƐĂŶǇƌĞƐƉŽŶƐŝďŝůŝƚǇƚŽĂŶǇŵĞŵďĞƌŽĨƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐĨŽƌŝŶĚĞƉĞŶĚĞŶƚǀĞƌŝĮĐĂƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞ representations, factual or otherwise, contained in this plat and the documents associated within it. ______________________________ ______________________________ Dave Hall Date City of Georgetown Floodplain Administrator STATE OF TEXAS { KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON { I, Nancy Rister, Clerk of the County Court of said County, do hereby certify that the foregoing ŝŶƐƚƌƵŵĞŶƚŝŶǁƌŝƚŝŶŐ͕ǁŝƚŚŝƚƐĐĞƌƚŝĮĐĂƚĞǁĂƐĮůĞĚĨŽƌƌĞĐŽƌĚŝŶŵǇŽĨĨŝĐĞŽŶƚŚĞͺͺͺͺͺĚĂǇŽĨͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ϮϬͺͺ͕ ͕͘͘ĂƚͺͺͺͺͺŽ͛ĐůŽĐŬ͕ͺͺ͘ŵ͘ĂŶĚĚƵůǇƌĞĐŽƌĚĞĚŽŶƚŚĞͺͺͺͺͺĚĂǇŽĨͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ϮϬͺͺͺ͕͕͘͘ĂƚͺͺͺŽ͛ĐůŽĐŬ͕ ___.m. in the Plat Records of said County in Document No._______________________________. TO CERTIFY WHICH, WITNESS my hand and seal at the County Court of said County, at my office in Georgetown, Texas the date last shown above written. Nancy Rister, Clerk County Court of Williamson County, Texas By:_______________________Deputy This subdivision known as REPLAT LOT A FINAL PLAT OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPEMENT OF SUN CITY GEORGETOWN SUN CITY BOULEVARD EXTENSION, has been approved according to the minutes of the meeting of the Georgetown Planning and Zoning Commission on the _____day of ________________, 2015, A.D. __________________________________ ____________________ Josh Schroeder, Chairman Date __________________________________ _____________________ Scott Ranking, Secretary Date ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS, PLANNERS 8868 Research Blvd. , Suite 407 Austin, TX 78758 512.916.0224 TBPLS Firm Registration No.101776.01 www.mckimcreed.com STATE OF TEXAS { KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON { I, Darrell D. White, Registered Professional Land Surveyor in the State of Texas, do hereby certify that this plat is true and correctly made from an actual survey made on the ground of the property legally described hereon, and that there are no apparent discrepancies, conflicts, overlapping of improvements, visible utility lines or roads in place, except as shown on the accompanying plat, and that the corner monuments shown thereon were properly placed under my supervision in accordance with the subdivision regulations of the City of Georgetown, Texas. TO CERTIFY WHICH, WITNESS my hand and seal at Georgetown, Williamson County, Texas. ________________________________Date: Darrell D. White Registered Professional Land Surveyor Texas Registration Number 4816 Prepared by: Mckim&Creed 8868 Research Blvd., Suite 407 Austin, Texas 78758 TBPLS Firm Registration Number 101776-01 DARRELL D. WHITE 4816 ST A T E O F T E X A S L A N D S U R V E Y O R METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION REPLAT LOT A 10.181 ACRES BURRELL EAVES SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 216 WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS Being 10.181 acres of land situated in the Burrell Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 216 of Williamson County, Texas, and being a portion of ĂĐĂůůĞĚϭϴ͘ϴϭϵĂĐƌĞƐƚƌĂĐƚŽĨůĂŶĚƌĞĐŽƌĚĞĚĂƐ^ƵŶŝƚǇ'ĞŽƌŐĞƚŽǁŶ͕^ƵŶŝƚǇŽƵůĞǀĂƌĚǆƚĞŶƐŝŽŶ;ĂƐƚͿĂƐƌĞĐŽƌĚĞĚŝŶĂďŝŶĞƚ͞&&͕͟ Slides 171-173 of the Official Records of Williamson County, Texas (O.R.W.C.T.). Said 10.181 acre tract being more being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows with all bearings being referenced to the Texas State Plane Coordinate System, Texas Central Zone, NAD 83/93 HARN Datum with all distances shown hereon converted to surface values by multiplying by the combined scale factor of 1.000143965. BEGINNING at a 3/4-inch iron rod found in concrete (X=3,123,750.89, Y=10,241,739.88) on the north line of a called 117.4205 acre tract conveyed to Pulte Homes of Texas, L.P. as recorded in Document No. 2015021907, Official Public Records of Williamson County, Texas (O.P.R.W.C.T.) and marking the southeasterly corner of Sun City Georgetown, Neighborhood Thirty-Eight, as recorded in ĂďŝŶĞƚ͕͟͞^ůŝĚĞƐϯϵϱͲϰϬϬŽĨƚŚĞtŝůůŝĂŵƐŽŶŽƵŶƚǇ͕WůĂƚƌĞĐŽƌĚƐ;t͘͘W͘Z͘ͿĂŶĚƚŚĞƐŽƵƚŚǁĞƐƚĐŽƌŶĞƌŽĨ>ŽƚŽĨƐĂŝĚ^ƵŶŝƚǇ Georgetown, Sun City Boulevard Extension (East); d,E͕EŽƌƚŚϬϬΣϯϯΖϯϬ͟tĞƐƚ͕ĚĞƉĂƌƚŝŶŐƚŚĞŶŽƌƚŚůŝŶĞŽĨƐĂŝĚϭϭϳ͘ϰϮϬϱĂĐƌĞƚƌĂĐƚ͕ǁŝƚŚƚŚĞůŝŶĞĐŽŵŵŽŶƚŽƚŚĞĞĂƐƚůŝŶĞŽĨƐĂŝĚ Sun City Georgetown, Neighborhood Thirty-Eight and the west line of said Lot A, a distance of 278.54 feet to a found 1/2-inch iron ƌŽĚǁŝƚŚĐĂƉƐƚĂŵƉĞĚ͞^hZsKE/E͟ŽŶƚŚĞƐŽƵƚŚĞƌůǇƌŝŐŚƚͲŽĨͲǁĂǇůŝŶĞŽĨ^ƵŶŝƚǇŽƵůĞǀĂƌĚ;ϭϮϬͲĨĞĞƚǁŝĚĞͿĂƐƐŚŽǁŶŽŶƐĂŝĚƉůĂƚ of Sun City Georgetown, Sun City Boulevard Extension (East); THENCE, along the southerly right-of-way line of Sun City Boulevard, the following four (4) courses and distances: 1.ϴϳϰ͘ϲϱĨĞĞƚĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞĂƌĐŽĨĂĐƵƌǀĞƚŽƚŚĞůĞĨƚ͕ŚĂǀŝŶŐĂĚĞůƚĂŽĨϰϯΣϰϲΖϬϯ͕͟ĂƌĂĚŝƵƐŽĨϭϭϰϱ͘ϬϬĨĞĞƚ͕ĂŶĚĐŚŽƌĚďĞĂƌŝŶŐEŽƌƚŚ ϳϱΣϭϰΖϰϲ͟ĂƐƚ͕ϴϱϯ͘ϱϰĨĞĞƚƚŽĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚĐĂƉƐƚĂŵƉĞĚ͞D</DΘZ͕/E͕͘͟ 2.EŽƌƚŚϱϯΣϮϭΖϰϰ͟ĂƐƚ͕ĂĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨϭϲϬ͘ϳϲĨĞĞƚƚŽĂƉŽŝŶƚŽĨĐƵƌǀĂƚƵƌĞĂŶĚĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚĐĂƉƐƚĂŵƉĞĚ͞D</DΘ Z͕/E͕͘͟ 3.ϱϱϬ͘ϰϲĨĞĞƚĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞĂƌĐŽĨĂĐƵƌǀĞƚŽƚŚĞƌŝŐŚƚ͕ŚĂǀŝŶŐĂĚĞůƚĂŽĨϮϳΣϯϵΖϱϳ͕͟ĂƌĂĚŝƵƐŽĨϭϭϰϬ͘ϬϬĨĞĞƚ͕ĂŶĚĐŚŽƌĚďĞĂƌŝŶŐEŽƌƚŚ ϲϳΣϭϭΖϰϯ͟ĂƐƚ͕ϱϰϱ͘ϭϯĨĞĞƚƚŽĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚĐĂƉƐƚĂŵƉĞĚ͞D</DΘZ͕/E͕͘͟ 4.EŽƌƚŚϲϵΣϬϳΖϮϬ͟ĂƐƚ͕ĂĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨϰϯϲ͘ϰϯĨĞĞƚƚŽĂƉŽŝŶƚϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚĐĂƉƐƚĂŵƉĞĚ͞D</DΘZ͕/E͘͟ŽŶƚŚĞ westerly right-of-way line of State Highway 195 (right-of-way width varies); THENCE, 51.97 feet along the arc of a curve to the left of said westerly right-of-way line of State Highway 195, having a delta of ϬϬΣϭϱΖϮϲ͕͟ĂƌĂĚŝƵƐŽĨϭϭϱϳϵ͘ϭϲĨĞĞƚ͕ĂŶĚĐŚŽƌĚďĞĂƌŝŶŐ^ŽƵƚŚϱϭΣϱϵΖϱϱ͟ĂƐƚ͕ϱϭ͘ϵϳĨĞĞƚƚŽĂϯͬϰͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚŝŶĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞ͕ d,E͕^ŽƵƚŚϲϴΣϱϬΖϭϭ͟tĞƐƚ͕ĚĞƉĂƌƚŝŶŐƐĂŝĚǁĞƐƚĞƌůǇƌŝŐŚƚͲŽĨͲǁĂǇůŝŶĞŽĨ^ƚĂƚĞ,ŝŐŚǁĂǇϭϵϱ͕ǁŝƚŚƚŚĞŶŽƌƚŚůŝŶĞŽĨĂĐĂůůĞĚϭϭ͘ϳϵ acre tract, less a portion for additional right-of-way of State Highway 195, being Lot 1 of a Partition Deed as recorded in Document No. 2010071926, O.P.R.W.C.T. and with the north line of said 117.4205 acre tract, at a distance of 295.20 feet passing a 1/2-inch iron ƌŽĚǁŝƚŚĐĂƉƐƚĂŵƉĞĚ͞D</DΘZ͟ĨŽƌƚŚĞŶŽƌƚŚǁĞƐƚĐŽƌŶĞƌŽĨƐĂŝĚϭϭ͘ϳϵĂĐƌĞƚƌĂĐƚĂŶĚƚŚĞŶŽƌƚŚĞĂƐƚĐŽƌŶĞƌŽĨƐĂŝĚϭϭϳ͘ϰϮϬϱ ĂĐƌĞƚƌĂĐƚ͕ĂƚĂĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨϳϵϭ͘ϬϵĨĞĞƚƉĂƐƐŝŶŐĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚĐĂƉƐƚĂŵƉĞĚ͞D</DΘZ͕͟ĂƚĂĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨϴϲϱ͘ϳϴĨĞĞƚ ƉĂƐƐŝŶŐĂϭͬϮͲŝŶĐŚŝƌŽŶƌŽĚǁŝƚŚĐĂƉƐƚĂŵƉĞĚ͞D</DΘZ͕͟ĂƚŽƚĂůĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨϯϬϲϯ͘ϰϰĨĞĞƚƚŽƚŚĞWK/EdK&'/EE/E'ĂŶĚ containing a computed area of 10.181 acres of land. This metes and bounds description is accompanied with a sketch. PFP-2015-006 FOR REVIEW. THIS DOCUMENT IS RELEASED FOR THE PURPOSE OF REVIEW UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF BRYAN E. MOORE, P.E. REG. #98920 ON 11/18/15. IT IS NOT TO BE USED FOR BIDDING, PERMIT OR CONSTRUCTION. Page 35 of 56 City of Georgetown, Texas Planning and Zoning December 1, 2015 SUBJECT: Public Hearing and possible action on Rezoning from the General Commercial (C-3) District with conditions to the General Commercial (C-3) District for 2.72 acres, being Lot 1 of Fountainwood Plaza, located at 5610 Williams Dr. (REZ-2015-016) Carolyn Horner, AICP **This item has been withdrawn at the applicant's request** ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. SUBMITTED BY: Carolyn Horner, AICP and Sofia Nelson, CNU-A, Director Page 36 of 56 City of Georgetown, Texas Planning and Zoning December 1, 2015 SUBJECT: Public Hearing and possible action on a request for Rezoning of 4.0 acres in the Nicholas Porter Survey located at 1308 and 1402 Williams Drive, from Residential Single-family District (RS) to the Local Commercial District (C-1), to be known as Gabriel Bluffs. Mike Elabarger, Senior Planner ITEM SUMMARY: Background: The applicant has requested to rezone 4.0 acres of land from the Residential Single-family (RS) District to the Local Commercial (C-1) District. The properties span 430 linear feet along the south side of Williams Drive between Rivery Boulevard and the IH-35 interchange, with the Future Land Use category of Specialty Mixed Use Area (SMUA). The Gateway Overlay District (a 25’ landscape area) applies to the property. Public Comment: As of the date of this report, there has been one (1) public comment received, in favor. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. The applicant has paid the required fees. SUBMITTED BY: Mike Elabarger, Senior Planner and Sofia Nelson, CNU-A, Planning Director ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Staff Report Cover Memo Exhibit 1 - Future Land Use / Transportation Map Backup Material Exhibit 2 - Zoning Map Backup Material Page 37 of 56 Georgetown Planning Department Staff Report 4.00 acres in the Nicholas Porter Survey - Rezoning Page 1 of 6 From RS to C-1 Report Date: November 25, 2015 File No: REZ-2015-025 Project Planner: Mike Elabarger, Senior Planner Item Details Project Name: Gabriel Bluffs Location: 1402 & 1308 Williams Drive Total Acreage: 4.00 acres Legal Description: 4.00 acres in the Nicholas Porter Survey (comprising seven properties) Applicant: Wade Todd, National Site Solutions Property Owner: 1308 Williams – Sheila Annette Witherspoon 1402 Williams – Shell Family Trust Contact: Wade Todd, National Site Solutions Existing Use: Two single family residences Existing Zoning: Residential Single-family (RS) District Proposed Zoning: Local Commercial (C-1) District Future Land Use: Specialty Mixed Use Area (SMUA) Growth Tier: Tier 1A Overview of Applicant’s Request The applicant has requested to rezone 4.00 acres of land from the Residential Single-family (RS) District to the Local Commercial (C-1) District. The properties span 430 linear feet along the south side of Williams Drive between Rivery Boulevard and the IH-35 interchange, with the Future Land Use category of Specialty Mixed Use Area (SMUA). The Gateway Overlay District (a 25’ landscape area) applies to the property. Site Information Location: The site is located along the south side of Williams Drive, between Morris Lane and Rivery Boulevard. 1402 Williams comprises five (5) separate properties totaling 2.26 acres and the address points of 1400, 1402, 1410, 1416, and 1422 Williams Drive. 1308 Williams comprises two (2) properties totaling 1.74 acres and the address points of 1308 and 1320. Combined the properties have approximately 430 linear feet of frontage on Williams Drive. Page 38 of 56 Planning Department Staff Report 4.00 acres in the Nicholas Porter Survey - Rezoning Page 2 of 6 From RS to C-1 Physical Characteristics: The site has extensive tree coverage (mostly cedars) and has no known Karst features. The properties drop elevation away from Williams Drive, and the rear of the properties form a cliff that falls to the San Gabriel River, where the properties end. Surrounding Properties: The immediately surrounding properties are a mix of commercial and residential uses, but nearly all properties fronting Williams Drive are now commercially used. This vicinity has a mix of residential properties that have been repurposed for small office or retail uses, and purpose-built commercial/retail properties. The former McCoy Elementary dominates the block on the north side of Williams, where the extension of Rivery Boulevard will cross it and establish new land uses and development patterns in the future. This block of Williams is all contiguous to the San Gabriel River, where a large view-shed opens up to the Summit at Rivery project to the southwest. Page 39 of 56 Planning Department Staff Report 4.00 acres in the Nicholas Porter Survey - Rezoning Page 3 of 6 From RS to C-1 Location Zoning Future Land Use Existing Use North RS, Residential Single-family and C-1, Local Commercial Specialty Mixed Use Area Commercial, office, GISD property. South C-3, General Commercial [across San Gabriel River] Moderate Density Residential, Open Space San Gabriel River [the Summit at Rivery project – townhomes, hotel, retail, apartments – is 500’ across the river.] East RS, Residential Single-family Specialty Mixed Use Area Single-family residences West C-1, Local Commercial Specialty Mixed Use Area Vacant land, then commercial (Extraco Bank) Property History The property was annexed into the City’s full jurisdiction in 1954. The grouping of properties comprising 1402 Williams contains one residence which is several decades old. Two properties comprise what is presented as 1308 Williams, and there is one single family dwelling on this property. The properties are all unplatted, with legal lot status according to the UDC unknown at this time. 2030 Comprehensive Plan The properties are contained within the 2030 Plan land use designation of Specialty Mixed Use Area (SMUA); see Exhibit 1. This category encourages mixed use developments and planned ‘centers’ that can integrate complementary uses. Emphasized activities would include retail, offices, and entertainment, with options for civic and parks/green spaces as well as higher density, multi-family style housing. The SMUA category exists in strategic locations (see below) where the nucleus of ingredients exist to create patterns of development focused on pedestrian-oriented, storefront-style shopping streets. • From Rivery Boulevard to IH-35 on both sides of Williams Drive [this site]. • West side of IH-35 north of Williams to Old Airport Road. • Central portion of Wolf Ranch Parkway between the Rivery Project and the area north of West University Avenue and a portion east toward IH-35. • The core of Downtown centered on Austin Avenue/Main Street between 2nd Street and West University Avenue. • A large swath south of Leander Road between IH-35 and (future) Southwest Inner Loop. • A node at Southeast Inner Loop and Sam Houston Boulevard and Maple Street [Transit Oriented Develoment (TOD) area]. The 2030 Plan Growth Tier Map designation is Tier 1A, that portion of the city where infrastructure systems are in place, or can be economically provided and where the bulk of the city’s growth should be guided over the near term. Page 40 of 56 Planning Department Staff Report 4.00 acres in the Nicholas Porter Survey - Rezoning Page 4 of 6 From RS to C-1 Proposed Zoning District The C-1 district provides for areas of commercial and retail activities that primarily serve residential areas. The District is more appropriate along major or minor thoroughfares and corridors including Williams Drive. Typical allowed uses in the C-1 district include restaurants (including drive-through), offices, retail sales, personal services, assisted living facilities, hotels, and gas stations. Development standards for the C-1 District include a maximum building height of 35 feet, front setback of 25 feet, side setback of 10 feet (15’ adjacent residential zoning), and rear setback of 0 feet (25’ adjacent residential zoning). Utilities Electric, water, and wastewater are served by City of Georgetown. A Utility Evaluation (UTE- 2015-018) was previously submitted for these properties, for development to include 16,200 square feet of office space, 5,000 square feet of a convenience store with restaurant, and 13,600 square feet of retail. The City’s evaluation letter indicated that the anticipated impacts of the project could be handled by the existing 12-inch waterline and 10-inch wastewater line that serve the properties. Water and sewer impact fees will be assessed upon development based on the submission date of a subdivision plat. If future development varies greatly from what was considered in the evaluation noted above, another evaluation may be required. Transportation The access to this property will be from Williams Drive solely unless cross access is provided to Rivery Boulevard via adjacent properties. Exact locations, widths, etc. of driveways will be determined during Site Development Plan review, based on driveway separation distances, roadways speeds, site triangles, utility locations, etc. Additional required right-of-way for Williams Drive has been identified and will be provided via the subdivision process. Interparcel connections between future lots, or segments of development, will be vetted during each Site Development Plan review to facilitate cross-access between lots/uses so that local trips do not require vehicular entry onto Williams Drive to essentially go next door. Future Application(s) To develop the property, the following applications will be required to be submitted: • Preliminary Plat to be considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission; • Construction Plans (public infrastructure) to be processed administratively; • Final Plat to be processed administratively; • Site Development Plans to be processed administratively; • Building permits for construction to be processed administratively; • Certificates of Occupancy for tenancy/opening to the public. Staff Analysis Staff has reviewed the request and offers the following findings: Page 41 of 56 Planning Department Staff Report 4.00 acres in the Nicholas Porter Survey - Rezoning Page 5 of 6 From RS to C-1 • The C-1 District provides for the type of commercial, retail, and service uses that fulfill the Future Land Use category description. The development standards (setbacks, pedestrian environment) associated with the C-1 District do not guarantee fulfillment of the goals the future land use category has for the built environment. • Williams Drive, an Arterial level roadway, is appropriate to have non-residential uses fronting and accessing from it. • The SMUA category describes a level and specificity of development that the by-right means of development under the C-1 District cannot guarantee will be delivered. The category specifically mentions that it is ‘best accommodated by a planned unit development or specific mixed-use zoning standards’. • A Planned Unit Development (PUD) rezoning proposal, that met the intents of a PUD as described in the Unified Development Code, and boosted by policies in the Comprehensive Plan, would be a preferable means of entitling this property with the ultimate zoning plan to facilitate modern development. • Mixed-use zoning, per UDC Section 4.09, isn’t feasible on this property due to the (small) size of the property. The implementation of the Mixed-Use zoning requires a regulating plan (similar to a concept plan). The regulating plan establishes provisions for street design, site layout and architectural requirements. The use of this zoning will be best utilized if used along a corridor rather than on a parcel by parcel basis. • Though it’s recognized by the City as a prime gateway area worthy of higher-level development, there is no over-riding set of regulations in place to ensure development meets the higher expectations and maximizes the opportunities the area has. The points above do not indicate an affirmative level of support from staff, however staff acknowledges there is not a better zoning designation in place at this time to offer to a property owner/applicant. A PUD request is voluntary, and ultimately is the applicant’s vision of their development, and while staff has the ability to recommend development standards, ultimately it is up to the applicant to make a proposal to the City. For the reasons above, staff is not providing a recommendation at this time. Staff believes it is critical to provide a clear and predictable development environment, particularly in the gateways of the community. While the vision as stated in the Comprehensive Plan for this area is generally appropriate, the tools available to implement the vision are not in place. As it pertains to this case, for the reasons listed above, staff is not providing a recommendation. Staff believes it is critical for the City to analyze and develop standards for this area on a corridor level. Inter Departmental, Governmental and Agency Comments None Page 42 of 56 Planning Department Staff Report 4.00 acres in the Nicholas Porter Survey - Rezoning Page 6 of 6 From RS to C-1 Public Comments A total of 13 notices were sent out to property owners within 200 feet of the proposed rezoning. Public notice was posted in the Sun newspaper on November 15th. As of the writing of this report, one (1) written comment has been received, in favor. Attachments Exhibit 1 – Future Land Use Map Exhibit 2 – Zoning Map Meetings Schedule December 1, 2015 – Planning and Zoning Commission Public Hearing January 12, 2016 – City Council Public Hearing and First Reading of the Ordinance January 26, 2016 – City Council Second Reading of the Ordinance Page 43 of 56 (R i v e r /S t r e a m ) HINTZ RD ADAMS ST WIL L I A M S D R W O L F R A N C H P K WY CLAY ST N IH 3 5 S B E JA N I S D R PARK W A Y S T S H A N N O N LN C O U N T RY CLUBRD RIV E R SID E DR PARK LN HIG H K NOLL L N MC C O Y L N W JA N I S D R M E S Q U I T E L N S IH 3 5 F W Y N B MORRI S D R CEDA R D R SIH35FWYSB W C E N T R A L D R EXIT261SB WILLIAMSDRTNNB RIV E R Y B L V D O A K L N 0 500 1,000 Feet Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only ¯ LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ Future Land Use / Overall Transportation Plan Exhibit #2 REZ-2015-025 Legend Thoroughfare Future Land Use Institutional Regional Commercial Community Commercial Employment Center Low Density Residential Mining Mixed Use Community Mixed Use Neighborhood Center Moderate Density Residential Open Space Specialty Mixed Use Area Ag / Rural Residential §¨¦35 W illia msDr Booty'sCrossingRd N A u s t i n A v e NAustinAve N A u s t i n A v e NColleg e StRiveryBlvd N A u s t i n A v e W olfRanchPkw y E Morro w St N orth w estBlvdSite ³City Limits Street Site Existing Collector Existing Freeway Existing Major Arterial Existing Minor Arterial Existing Ramp Proposed Collector Proposed Freeway Propsed Frontage Road Proposed Major Arterial Proposed Minor Arterial Proposed Railroad High Density Residential REZ-2015-025 Page 44 of 56 (River/Stream) N IH 3 5 S B HINTZRD ADAMS ST WILLIA MS DR WO O D L A W N A V E COUNTRYCLUBRD S IH 3 5 S B SHAN N O N L N MCC O Y L N M E S Q U I T E L N RIV E R SID E DR PARK LN HIGHKN O L L LN WJANISDR S IH 3 5 F W Y S B MORRI S D R EXIT 261SB W C E N T R A L D R CEDA R D R WILLIAMSDRTNNB RIV E R Y B L V D O A K L N Zoning InformationREZ-2015-025Exhibit #2 ¯ Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only 0 500 1,000Feet LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ §¨¦35 Willia m sDr Booty'sCrossingRd N A u s t i n A v e NAustinAve N A u s t i n A v e NColle g e StRiveryBlvd N A u s t i n A v e WolfRanchPkw y EMorro w St N orth w estBlvd ³ Site City Limits Street Site REZ-2015-025 Page 45 of 56 City of Georgetown, Texas Planning and Zoning December 1, 2015 SUBJECT: Public Hearing and possible action on a request to Rezone 1.641 acres being a portion of Sparks Addition, Blocks 9-10 and 13-15, and abandoned right-of-way, located at 2200 Church Street, from the Residential Single-family (RS) District and Industrial (IN) District to the Low Density Multifamily (MF-1) District. Mike Elabarger, Senior Planner ITEM SUMMARY: Background: The applicant has requested to rezone a 1.641 acre portion of the Sparks Addition from the Residential Single-family (RS) and Industrial (IN) Districts to the Low Density Multifamily District (MF-1). The Future Land Use designation for the property is Moderate Density Residential, which promotes residential densities of between 3 and 6 dwelling units per acre. The proposed zoning district allows up to 14 dwelling units per acre, and such multifamily development under this district processes via a Site Development Plan. UDC Section 4.04.010(F.) states that the MF-1 District may be appropriate in the Moderate Density Residential future land use category based on location, surrounding uses, and infrastructure impacts. Staff is not supportive of the request for reasons related to the adjacent land uses, the adjacent zoning districts, and the site constraints of the subject property, as detailed in the staff report. Public Comment: As of the date of this report, no written public comments have been received. Recommendation: Recommend to City Council Denial of the request to rezone 1.641 acres of the Sparks Addition to the MF-1 District. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. The applicant has paid the required fees. SUBMITTED BY: Mike Elabarger, Senior Planner and Sofia Nelson, CNU-A, Planning Director ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Staff Report Cover Memo Exhibit 1 - Future Land Use / Transportation Map Backup Material Exhibit 2 - Zoning Map Backup Material Exhibit 3 - Proposed Zoning District Backup Material Page 46 of 56 Georgetown Planning Department Staff Report 2200 Church Street - Rezoning Page 1 of 6 RS and IN to MF-1 Report Date: November 25, 2015 File No: REZ-2015-015 Project Planner: Mike Elabarger, Senior Planner Item Details Project Name: 2200 Church Street Project Address: 2200 Church Street Location: Church Street between 19th ½, 20th, and 21st Streets (See Exhibits 1 and 2) Total Acreage: 1.641 acres Legal Description: Sparks Addition, Blocks 9-10 and 13-15, and abandoned right-of-way Applicant: Tim Haynie, P.E. Property Owner: Todd Routh, Church Street Building LTD Contact: Tim Haynie, P.E. Existing Use: Vacant Existing Zoning: Residential Single-family (RS) and Industrial (IN) Districts Proposed Zoning: Low Density Multifamily (MF-1) District Future Land Use: Moderate Density Residential (MDR) Growth Tier: Tier 1A Overview of Applicant’s Request The applicant has requested to rezone a 1.641 acre portion of the Sparks Addition from the Residential Single-family (RS) and Industrial (IN) Districts to the Low Density Multifamily District (MF-1). The Future Land Use designation for the property is Moderate Density Residential, which promotes residential densities of between 3 and 6 dwelling units per acre. The proposed District allows up to 14 dwelling units per acre, and such multifamily development under this District processes via a Site Development Plan. Site Information Location: This property extends between East 21st Street and portions of East 20th Street and East 19th ½ Street; see Exhibits 1 and 2 and aerial excerpt below. Physical Characteristics: The property is flat, treeless, and undeveloped with a drainage ditch running north/south from the elbow bend of East 20th Street to East 21 st Street. The property is somewhat shaped like an “S”, bounded by East 20th Street, the cemetery, and the fenced storage yard. Surrounding Properties: The surrounding properties include a cemetery, a fenced vehicle storage yard, an industrial/manufacturing complex, single-family residences, a vacant property that regularly houses outdoor materials storage, and the Williamson Central Appraisal District office. (See Exhibits 1 & 2, and aerial exhibit in this report) Page 47 of 56 Planning Department Staff Report 2200 Church Street - Rezoning Page 2 of 6 RS and IN to MF-1 Property History The property was annexed into the City in 1915, and there is no known development. The drainage swale that runs across the property conveys stormwater from north of 20th Street to 21st Street and further south and east (see picture in this staff report). The property legal description is a portion of the Sparks Addition, which dates to 1909. The portion subject to this rezoning will need to be properly subdivided. The origins of the residential and industrial zoning that cover the property are not completely known, but the adoption of the Unified Development Code (UDC) in 2003 redefined the zoning of the property to the present-day Residential Single-Family (RS) and Industrial (IN) Districts. 2030 Comprehensive Plan Land Use: The property lies within the 2030 Plan future land use designation of Moderate Density Residential, which calls for densities of between 3.1 and 6 dwelling units per acre, and supports attached single-family dwellings such as townhouses. It also describes the appropriateness of in-fill development at greater densities where the property and associated aspects allow it. The proposed Low Density Multifamily Location Zoning Future Land Use Existing Use North RS, Residential Single-family Moderate Density Residential Single family residences South IN, Industrial Institutional and Open Space Undeveloped, floodplain East RS, Residential Single-family and IN, Industrial Moderate Density Residential Industrial uses, manufacturing West RS, Residential Single-family and IN, Industrial Moderate Density Residential Cemetery Page 48 of 56 Planning Department Staff Report 2200 Church Street - Rezoning Page 3 of 6 RS and IN to MF-1 District allows the Specific Use of ‘Multifamily Detached and Attached Units’, whereby individual structures can house anywhere from one to twelve units. Growth Tier: The 2030 Plan Growth Tier Map designation is Tier 1A, that portion of the city where infrastructure systems are in place, or can be economically provided and where the bulk of the city’s growth should be guided over the near term. Proposed Zoning District The Low Density Multifamily (MF-1) District is intended for attached and detached multi-family residential development, such as apartments, condominiums, triplexes, and fourplexes, at a density not to exceed 14 dwelling units per acre. The MF-1 District can be appropriate in the Moderate Density Residential future land use category based on the particular location, surrounding uses, and infrastructure impacts. Convenient access to major roadways should be present, and the District can be proximate to both residential and non-residential districts, with the ability to serve as a transition between those two. Page 49 of 56 Planning Department Staff Report 2200 Church Street - Rezoning Page 4 of 6 RS and IN to MF-1 Utilities Electric, water, and wastewater utilities for the property are served by the City of Georgetown. A Utility Evaluation was determined by staff to not be necessary in order for the rezoning to be reviewed and considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, but utility improvements or extensions will be required at the time of subdivision platting. Transportation The portion of the property proposed for rezoning would have road frontage on 19th ½ , 20th, and 21st Streets. East 21st Street is classified as a Collector level road (24’ of pavement within an approxiamtely 60’ right-of-way); the other two streets are classified as Local Streets, with pavement widths between 20’ and 24’, and variable right-of-way. During the platting process, any deficiencies in right-of-way width will be required from this property. If right-of-way is required, the subject property would be reduced in size, which would directly relate to the maximum possible density of the development. Any new driveways for development subject to the proposed MF-1 zoning district would be determined at the time of Site Development Plan review, based on driveway separation, roadway design speed, and site triangle considerations. Driveways from all three streets could be achieved. Future Application(s) If the rezoning is approved by City Council, the following applications would be required to be submitted:  Preliminary Plat (Planning & Zoning Commission approval required)  Final Plat (administrative, recorded with Williamson County)  Site Development Plan for multifamily development processed administratively; and  Building permits for construction.  Certificate of Occupancy Staff Analysis Staff is not supportive of the requested rezoning for the following reasons: 1. The surrounding uses do not support any form of residential use in this particular area.  An active outdoor vehicle storage yard (barbed-wire chain-link fence at the property boundary) would form the eastern property boundary nearest 21st Street.  An active industrial complex comprising two buildings (with multiple tenants and operations) sits immediately to the east, more-so on the northeast side of the proposed District.  Immediately across 21st Street from the site is an undeveloped property that is continuously utilized as a construction staging area, with un-fenced outdoor storage of building materials, vehicles, and debris on a consistent basis. This property is largely encumbered by floodplain, Page 50 of 56 Planning Department Staff Report 2200 Church Street - Rezoning Page 5 of 6 RS and IN to MF-1 which will likely inhibit any future development, thereby rendering the existing condition the long-term expected use of the property.  An active cemetery would form the western property boundary between 20th and 21st Streets. 2. The site constraints of the requested District, principally the “s” shape configuration of the District (and future lot) would inherently split development into ‘north’ and ‘south’ portions. It is unknown whether the existing drainage swale can be moved or channelized and placed underground, thus enabling development on top of it (likely parking and/or drive aisles); if not, this feature will dictate the development pattern. 3. The existing zoning of the surrounding properties within this area does not support MF-1, or any residential zoning or uses at this time. The incompatibility between the existing Residential Single- family and Industrial Zoning Districts is an unfortunate reality. Single-family development in the portion of the property currently zoned Residential Single-family would not be in the best interests of that property owner or the City. The history of the zoning is unknown (specifically), but in decades past, the RS District was utilized as a base or beginning District. Prior to the adoption of the UDC, allowed uses under zoning districts was done in a cumulative manner, whereby more intense uses would be permitted in ever intensifying Districts, but all lesser intense uses would also be permitted. This provided landowners a great level of flexibility for development, but also created future incompatibilities of uses that persist to this day. 4. Future Development Standards considerations –  The cemetery, zoned RS, would trigger a 15’ wide Medium Level Bufferyard on the western side of the proposed MF-1 District where they abut.  20th Street, which makes a 90-degree north bend, then a 90-degree eastern bend (becoming 19th ½ Street) could form side and rear yard boundaries of the property. The side building setback against RS zoning on the west side (the cemetery) would be 20 feet. The rear building setback, from 20th and 19 ½ Streets, would be 10 feet, thus allowing future residences to be within 10 feet of these streets.  Establishing the MF-1 District as proposed would trigger the neighboring Industrial property to provide a High Level Bufferyard for IN adjacent MF-1 districts, comprised of a 30-foot wide planting area with a solid 6’ screening wall and shade and evergreen trees if it were ever to redevelop. The ramification of this zoning change, as stated above, could be onerous on the industrial business to the east. This would be a negative if the City’s focus is on enabling Industrial development as a means of economic development and growth of the tax base; it would be a positive if such buffer requirements are a means to remove or dis-incentivize a non-conforming use (though zoning is Industrial) that does not comply with the Future Land Use designation of Moderate Density Residential. Normally, the Future Land Use designation (Moderate Density Residential here) is the first consideration of appropriateness of a proposed zoning district. The MF-1 district is described as a District that can serve as a transition zone between residentially zoned properties and more intense multifamily or commercial zoned properties. Page 51 of 56 Planning Department Staff Report 2200 Church Street - Rezoning Page 6 of 6 RS and IN to MF-1 The MDR category spreads from University Avenue to 21st Street, and east from beyond Austin Avenue to beyond the railroad tracks. Most of the areas is solidly developed as single-family residential, fulfilling the MDR purposes. This Future Land Use category was extended to 21st Street for purposes of laying out the desired land uses for both undeveloped and redeveloping properties. The industrial uses occurring on the remainder of this property are nonconforming to the Future Land Use category, despite the presence of a swath of Industrial zoning district. In this particular location, for the 1.641 acres proposed, based on the above points, Staff finds that the category does not support any type of residential development or zoning. MF-1 zoning at this location would not serve any transition or buffer purposes, and would only create a highly incompatible situation with the Industrial zoning and active industrial uses occurring immediately to the east. If the entire 6+ acre tract that the subject property is sought to be pulled from where proposing the MF-1 District, the MDR category would then be able to be fulfilled, and staff would be supportable. But as proposed, the incompatibilities potentially created do not merit support of the request. Inter Departmental, Governmental and Agency Comments None Public Comments A total of 15 notices were sent out to property owners within 200 feet of the proposed rezoning. Public notice was posted in the Sun newspaper on November 15, 2015. As of the writing of this report, no written comments have been received. Meetings Schedule December 1, 2015 – Planning and Zoning Commission Public Hearing January 12, 2016 – City Council First Reading and Public Hearing January 26, 2015 – City Council Second Reading Attachments Exhibit 1 – Future Land Use Map Exhibit 2 – Zoning Map Exhibit 3 – Proposed Zoning District Page 52 of 56 REZ-2015-015 FM 1460 K N I G H T S T E 17TH 1/2 ST E 18TH ST W 24TH ST I N D U S T R I A L A V E E U B A N K S T W A L N U T S T W 21ST ST E 20TH ST CYRUS AV E H O G G S T PA I G E S T A S H S T S C O L L E G E S T S C H U R C H S T A L L E Y B R U S H Y S T E 19TH STW 19TH ST W 20TH ST S M A I N S T E L M S T W 18TH ST H I G H L A N D D R E 17TH ST E 19TH 1/ 2 S T SAUSTINAVE E 21ST ST 0 500 1,000 Feet Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only ¯ LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ Future Land Use / Overall Transportation Plan Exhibit #1 REZ-2015-015 Legend Thoroughfare Future Land Use Institutional Regional Commercial Community Commercial Employment Center Low Density Residential Mining Mixed Use Community Mixed Use Neighborhood Center Moderate Density Residential Open Space Specialty Mixed Use Area Ag / Rural Residential W University Ave E University Ave S A u s t i n A v e ")1460 SAustinAve Site ³City Limits Street Site Existing Collector Existing Freeway Existing Major Arterial Existing Minor Arterial Existing Ramp Proposed Collector Proposed Freeway Propsed Frontage Road Proposed Major Arterial Proposed Minor Arterial Proposed Railroad High Density Residential Page 53 of 56 REZ-2015-015 F M 1460 K N I G H T S T E 21ST ST E 1 7 T H 1 /2 S T E 18TH ST E U B A N K S T INDU S T RIALAVE W 21ST ST E L M S T S C O L L E G E S T I N DUSTRIALAVE E 20TH ST CYRUS AV E H O G G S T PA I G E S T A S H S T S C H U R C H S T A L L E Y E 2 0 T H S T B R U S H Y S T E 19TH STW 19TH ST W 20TH ST H I G H L A N D D R S M A I N S T W 18TH ST SAUSTINAVE E 19TH 1/ 2 S T E 21ST ST Zoning InformationREZ-2015-015Exhibit #2 ¯ Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only 0 500 1,000Feet LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ W University Ave E University Ave Southw este r n B l v d S A u s t i n A v e ")1460 ³ Site City Limits Street Site Page 54 of 56 Page 55 of 56 Page 56 of 56