HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda_P&Z_03.05.2019Notice of Meeting for the
P lanning and Zoning Commission
of the City of Georgetown
March 5, 2019 at 6:00 P M
at City Council Chambers, 101 E ast 7th Street, Georgetown, T X
T he C ity of G eorgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If you
require as s is tance in partic ipating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the ADA, reas onable
as s is tance, adaptations , or ac commodations will be provided upon request. P leas e c ontact the C ity S ec retary's
O ffic e, at leas t three (3) days prior to the sc heduled meeting date, at (512) 930-3652 or C ity Hall at 808 Martin
Luther King Jr. S treet, G eorgetown, T X 78626 for additional information; T T Y users route through R elay
Texas at 711.
P ublic Wishing to Address the B oard
O n a s ubjec t that is posted on this agenda: P lease fill out a speaker regis tration form whic h can be found at the
Board meeting. C learly print your name, the letter of the item on which you wish to speak, and pres ent it to the
S taff Liais on, preferably prior to the start of the meeting. You will be c alled forward to speak when the Board
cons iders that item.
O n a s ubjec t not posted on the agenda: P ersons may add an item to a future Board agenda by filing a written
request with the S taff Liais on no later than one week prior to the Board meeting. T he reques t must include the
s peaker's name and the spec ific topic to be addres s ed with sufficient information to inform the board and the
public . F or Board Liaison c ontact information, pleas e logon to
http://government.georgetown.org/c ategory/boards -commissions /.
A As of the deadline, no persons were signed up to speak on items other than those posted on the agenda.
L egislativ e Regular Agenda
B Nomination and selec tion of Vic e-chair and S ec retary for the 2019/20 C ommission. S tephanie Mc Nickle,
R ec ording S ec retary
C C ons ideration and possible approval of the minutes from the F ebruary 19th P &Z meeting. S tephanie
Mc Nic kle, R ec ording S ec retary
D P ublic Hearing and possible action on a reques t for a R eplat of Lots 2-7, part of Lot 8, and a portion of
F irst S treet, of Bloc k 2, C ity of G eorgetown, cons is ting of approximately 1.289 ac res , located at 109 W
2nd S t (F P -2018-042). Madis on T homas , AI C P, His toric & Downtown P lanner
E P ublic Hearing and possible action on a reques t to rezone approximately 0.23 ac res out of Unit 2 Dawn
S t Ext of the Williams Addition, als o being out of the Nic holas P orter S urvey, Abstract No. 497, located
at 2302 Dawn Drive, from the O ffic e (O F ) to R esidential S ingle-F amily (R S ) zoning district (R EZ-2018-
030). Mic hael P atroski, P lanner
F P ublic Hearing and possible action on a S ubdivision Variance from the S idewalk C ons truction
requirement purs uant to S ection 12.07 of the Unified Development C ode, for the property loc ated at 716
S I H 35, bearing the legal des cription 4.428 acres of R ivery P H 1 Block B, Lot 5E, (2019-1-WAV).
Michael P atros ki, P lanner
G Update on the 2018/19 UDC Annual R eview P lan, S chedule and Next S teps . Andreina Dávila-Q uintero,
AI C P, C urrent P lanning Manager
Page 1 of 83
H Disc ussion and possible action regarding the potential P lanning and Zoning meeting s chedule for the
2019-2020 calendar year.
I Disc ussion Items:
Updates and Annouc ements (S ofia Nels on)
Update on the Georgetown Transportation Advisory Board (G TAB) meetings.
Q uestions or c omments from C ommis s ioners-in-Training about the actions and matters c onsidered on
this agenda.
R eminder of the March 19, 2019, P lanning and Zoning commissioners meeting in the C ouncil C hambers
loc ated at 101 Eas t 7th S treet, s tarting at 6:00pm.
Adjournment
Adjournment
C E RT IF IC AT E O F P O S T IN G
I, R obyn Densmore, C ity S ecretary for the C ity of G eorgetown, Texas, do hereby c ertify that this Notic e of
Meeting was pos ted at C ity Hall, 808 Martin Luther King Jr. S treet, G eorgetown, T X 78626, a place readily
ac cessible to the general public at all times, on the ______ day of __________________, 2019, at
__________, and remained so pos ted for at least 72 continuous hours preceding the sc heduled time of s aid
meeting.
____________________________________
R obyn Densmore, C ity S ecretary
Page 2 of 83
City of Georgetown, Texas
Planning and Zoning
March 5, 2019
S UB J E C T:
As of the deadline, no persons were signed up to speak on items other than those posted on the agenda.
IT E M S UMMARY:
F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
na
S UB MIT T E D B Y:
Page 3 of 83
City of Georgetown, Texas
Planning and Zoning
March 5, 2019
S UB J E C T:
C onsideration and pos s ible approval of the minutes from the F ebruary 19th P &Z meeting. S tephanie
Mc Nickle, R ecording S ecretary
IT E M S UMMARY:
F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
na
S UB MIT T E D B Y:
Page 4 of 83
City of Georgetown, Texas
Planning and Zoning
March 5, 2019
S UB J E C T:
P ublic Hearing and pos s ible ac tion on a request for a R eplat of Lots 2-7, part of Lot 8, and a portion of
F irs t S treet, of Block 2, C ity of G eorgetown, c onsisting of approximately 1.289 acres, loc ated at 109 W
2nd S t (F P -2018-042). Madison T homas, AI C P, Historic & Downtown P lanner
IT E M S UMMARY:
Overview of Applicant's Request:
T he applic ant is requesting to replat 1.289 ac res into a single lot in the Mixed-Use Downtown Zoning
Dis tric t.
S taff's Analysis:
S taff has reviewed the request in ac cordance with the Unified Development C ode (UDC ) and other
applicable codes. S taff has determined that the proposed request meets 5 out of the 5 criteria establis hed in
UDC S ec tion 3.08.080.D for a R eplat, as outlined in the attached S taff R eport.
Public Notification:
As req uired by the Unified Develo p ment C ode, all property owners within a 200-foot radius of the s ubjec t
property and within the s ub d ivis ion were no tified o f the R ep lat req ues t (16 notices), a legal notice
advertis ing the public hearing was plac ed in the S un News paper (F ebruary 13, 2019) and signs were pos ted
on-site. To d ate, s taff has rec eived 1 written c o mments in favor, and 0 in oppos itio n to the req ues t (Exhibit
3).
F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
None. T he applicant has paid the required application fees .
S UB MIT T E D B Y:
Madison T homas, AI C P, Historic & Downtown P lanner
AT TAC H ME N T S:
Description Type
FP-2018-042 - P&Z Staff Report Cover Memo
Exhibit 1- Location Map Exhibit
Exhibit 2- RePlat Exhibit
Exhibit 3- Public Comments Exhibit
Pres entation Pres entation
Page 5 of 83
Planning and Zoning Commission
Planning Department Staff Report
FP-2018-042
Riverplace Georgetown Subdivision Page 1 of 4
Report Date: March 1, 2019
Case No: FP-2018-042
Project Planner: Madison Thomas, AICP, Historic & Downtown Planner
Item Details
Project Name: Riverplace Georgetown Subdivision
Project Location: 109 W. 2nd Street, within City Council district No. 6.
Total Acreage: 1.289 acres
Legal Description: Being a 1.289 acre tract of land located in the Nicholas Porter Survey, Abstract
No. 497, patented in conflict with the Orville Perry Survey, Abstract No. 10,
also being Lots 2-7, Part of Lot 8, and a portion of First Street, of Block 2, City
of Georgetown.
Applicant: WAAPF Properties, LLC, c/o Austin Pfiester
Property Owner: Steger Bizzell, c/o James Cummins
Request: Approval of a Replat for the Riverplace Georgetown Subdivision.
Case History: This is the first public hearing of this request.
Page 6 of 83
Planning Department Staff Report
FP-2018-042
Riverplace Georgetown Subdivision Page 2 of 4
Plat Summary
Number of Phases: 1 Phase
Non-residential Lots: 1 non-residential lot
Total Lots: 1 lot
Linear Feet of Street: No new streets proposed.
Site Information
This property is located on the northeast corner of Austin Ave. and W 2nd Street at the north end of the
Downtown area. It is zoned Mixed-Use Downtown and is located in the Downtown Overlay district.
The Future Land Use Map designates this area as Special Area Mixed Use.
Physical and Natural Features:
This site is adjacent to S Austin Avenue, W 2nd Street, an unimproved portion of Main St. and a city
trail. The portion of the property closest to the trail, begins to slope downward towards the river. There
is a mix of open space and vegetation scattered throughout the site.
Utilities
The subject property is located within the City’s service area for water, wastewater, and electric. It is
anticipated there is adequate water and wastewater capacity to serve the subject property at this time.
A 10’ Public Utility Easement is being dedicated along the property line parallel to W 2nd Street.
Transportation
This property sits at the intersection of a major arterial road, S Austin Ave., and a collector, W 2nd Street.
Driveway access will be taken off of W 2nd Street. Approximately 312 sq.ft of right-of-way dedication is
required at the corner of Austin Ave. and W 2nd Street for sight visibility requirements. A TIA was not
required.
Parkland Dedication
Parkland dedication will be addressed with the site development plan through fee-in-lieu of.
Intergovernmental and Interdepartmental Review
The proposed Replat was reviewed by the applicable City departments. Subdivision Plats are reviewed
to ensure consistency with minimum lot size, impervious cover, streets and connectivity, and utility
improvement requirements, among other. All technical review comments have been addressed by the
Applicant.
Approval Criteria
Staff has reviewed the proposed rezoning request and has found that it complies with the criteria
established in UDC Chapter 3.08.080.D for a Replat, as outlined below:
APPROVAL CRITERIA FINDINGS STAFF COMMENTS
a. The Replat is acceptable for
consideration, meaning the
Complies The Plat has been deemed acceptable and
complete for consideration.
Page 7 of 83
Planning Department Staff Report
FP-2018-042
Riverplace Georgetown Subdivision Page 3 of 4
APPROVAL CRITERIA FINDINGS STAFF COMMENTS
application is complete and the
information contained within the
application is correct and sufficient
to allow adequate consideration and
final action.
b. The plat meets or exceeds the
requirements of this Unified
Development Code and any
applicable State or local laws
Complies The proposed Replat meets all applicable
technical requirements of the UDC
pertaining to streets, sidewalks, utilities,
and parkland.
c. The plat is consistent with the City's
Comprehensive Plan and any other
adopted plans as they relate to:
i. The City's current and future
streets, sidewalks, alleys, parks,
playgrounds, and public utility
facilities; and
ii. The extension, improvement, or
widening of City roads, taking
into account access to and
extension of sewer and water
mains and the instrumentality of
public utilities.
Complies The proposed Replat is consistent with
the Comprehensive Plan and the
Downtown Master Plan, as it meets all
applicable technical requirements of the
UDC pertaining to streets, sidewalks,
utilities, and parkland.
d. The plat meets any subdivision
design and improvement standards
adopted by the City pursuant to
Texas Local Government Code §
212.002 or § 212.044, governing plats
and subdivision of land within the
City's jurisdiction to promote the
health, safety, morals, or general
welfare of the City and the safe,
orderly, and healthful development
of the City.
Complies The proposed Replat meets all applicable
technical requirements of the UDC
adopted pursuant to Sections 212.002
and 212.044 of the Texas Local
Government Code to promote the health,
safety, morals, or general welfare of the
City and the safe, orderly, and healthful
development of the City, including but
not limited to Chapter 7, Non-Residential
Development Standards, Chapter 12,
Pedestrian and Vehicle Circulation, and
Chapter 13, Infrastructure and Public
Improvements of the UDC.
e. The tract of land subject to the
application is adequately served by
public improvements and
infrastructure.
Complies The subject property will be adequately
served by public improvements and
infrastructure.
f. A Subdivision Variance may be
requested as a companion
application to the consideration of a
Not
Applicable
No Subdivision Variance is being
requested as part of this Replat.
Page 8 of 83
Planning Department Staff Report
FP-2018-042
Riverplace Georgetown Subdivision Page 4 of 4
APPROVAL CRITERIA FINDINGS STAFF COMMENTS
Replat, according to the provisions
detailed in Section 3.22 of the UDC.
The Subdivision Variance and the
Replat shall be required to be
approved by P&Z.
g. A Replat may not amend or remove
any covenants or restrictions and is
controlling over the preceding plat.
Complies The proposed Replat does not amend or
remove any covenants or restrictions and
is controlling over the preceding plat.
Public Notification
As required by the Unified Development Code, all property owners within a 200-foot radius of the
subject property and within the subdivision were notified of the Replat request (16 notices), a legal
notice advertising the public hearing was placed in the Sun Newspaper (February 13, 2019) and signs
were posted on-site. To date, staff has received 1 written comments in favor, and 0 in opposition to the
request (Exhibit 3).
Attachments
Exhibit 1 – Location Map
Exhibit 2 – Proposed Plat of Riverplace Georgetown Subdivision
Exhibit 3 – Public Comments
Page 9 of 83
S IH 35 SB
S IH 35 NBS IH 35 FWY SB
S IH 35 FWY NB
EL
M
ST
E 7 T H S T
R
O
C
K
S
T
S
M
A
IN
S
T
A
SH
ST
H
O
L
L
Y
S
T
SCENIC DR
E 5 TH ST
E 4 TH ST
E 2 N D S T
WE
S
T
S
T
N
C
O
L
LE
GE
S
T
E 6 TH ST
S
A
U
S
TI
N
AV
E
E U N I V ER S IT Y AV E
W 8T H S T
PIN
E
ST
W 1 0 T H S T
S
M
Y
R
TL
E
S
T
S C
H
U
R
C
H
S
T
S
C
O
L
L
E
G
E
S
T
M
A
P
L
E
S
T
W 6 T H S T
W 4 T H S T
W 11T H ST
N AUSTIN AVE
WA
L
N
U
T
S
T
ENTR 262 SB
FO
R
E
S
T
S
T
EMORRO W ST
T H O M A S C T
W 7T H S T
L O W ER PARKRD
W 3R D S T
PVR
ENTR 261 NB
WOLFRA N C H P K W Y
E 1 0 T H S T
E 1 1 T H S T
EXIT 261 S B
MA
R
T
I
N
L
U
TH
E
R
K
I
N
G JR
S
T
W
L
W
A
L
D
E
N
D
R
N
M
Y
R
T
L
E
S
T
WILLIAMS DR
N
C
H
U
R
C
H
S
T
SOUTHWESTE R N BLVD
R I V E R O A K S C V
E V A LL E Y S T
E 8 T H S T
W M OR R O W S T
A LLY
S M I T H C R E E K R D
C
H
A
M
B
E
R
W
A
Y
HINTZ RD
WE
S
L
E
Y
A
N
D
R
W 5T H S T
R I V E R HILLSDR
B
R
I
D
G
E
S
T
N
H
I
L
L
V
I
E
W
D
R
N
MA
IN
S
T
W U N I V E RSI TY AV E
SO ULE D R
E 3 R D S T
W 9T H S T
R
I
V
E
R
YDRIVEWAY
BLU E HOLE PARK RD
RIV E R SID E D R
WSPRI N G S T
B R E N D ON L EE L N
RAILROADAVE
W 2 N D S T
J
O
H
N
C
A
R
T
E
R
D
R
W O O D L A WNAVE
E R U T ERSVIL
L
E
D
R
E 9 TH ST
R
U
C
K
E
R
S
T M C K E N Z I E D R
S A N G A B R I E L V I L LAG
E
B
L
V
D
R E T R E A
T
P
L
WATE R S E D G
E
C
I
R
E 9 TH 1 /2 S T
HERSHEY AVE
T
I
N
B
A
R
N
A
LY
E 9 T H S T
E 3 R D S T
PIN
E
ST
WE
S
T
S
T
FO
R
E
S
T
S
T
E 8 TH ST
H
O
L
L
Y
S
T
WA
L
N
U
T
S
T
W 2N D S T
FP-2018-042Exhibit #1
Coordi nate System : Texas State Plane/Centr al Zone/N AD 83/U S FeetCartographic Data For G eneral Plann ing Pu rpo ses Only
¯
Location Map LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
0 0.25 0.5Mi
Page 10 of 83
70.4'
79.9'
GRID N: 10207320.93
GRID E: 3131503.52
GRID N: 10207379.63
GRID E: 3131600.81
GRID N: 10207092.27
GRID E: 3131774.14
10' PUE HEREBY DEDICATED
BLOC
K
2
CITY
O
F
G
E
O
R
G
E
T
O
W
N
POB
FEM
A
Z
O
N
E
X
(
S
H
A
D
E
D
)
FEM
A
Z
O
N
E
X
(
U
N
S
H
A
D
E
D
)
FEMA ZON
E
A
E
FEMA ZON
E
X
(
S
H
A
D
E
D
)
BM 37-62B
BM 37-62A
LOT 1
BLOCK 1
1.281 AC
GRID N: 10207272.00
GRID E: 3131765.88
59
.
8
'
NICH
O
L
A
S
P
O
R
T
E
R
S
U
R
V
E
Y
N
O
.
4
9
7
PAT
E
N
T
E
D
I
N
C
O
N
F
L
I
C
T
W
I
T
H
T
H
E
ORV
I
L
L
E
P
E
R
R
Y
S
U
R
V
E
Y
,
A
-
1
0
WILL
I
A
M
S
O
N
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
T
E
X
A
S
CALLED 8,400 SQ. FT
LOT 1, AND PORTION OF LOT 8
CITY OF GEORGETOWN
DOC. NO. 2006113587, OPR
WEST FIRST ST.
(UNIMPROVED, NO DEDICATION FOUND)
AU
S
T
I
N
A
V
E
.
(R
O
W
V
A
R
I
E
S
)
(V
O
L
.
5
,
P
G
.
2
1
1
,
D
R
)
(F
O
R
M
E
R
L
Y
B
R
U
S
H
Y
S
T
)
MA
I
N
S
T
.
(U
N
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
D
)
(R
O
W
V
A
R
I
E
S
)
(V
O
L
.
5
,
P
G
.
2
1
1
,
D
R
)
WEST 2ND ST
(60' ROW)
(VOL. 5, PG. 211, DR)
10' WIDE GUY WIRE EASEMENT
DOC. NO. 2006113581, OPR
10' WIDE ELECTRIC EASEMENT
DOC.NO. 2006113581, OPR
10'X20' WASTEWATER EASEMENT
DOC. NO. 2006113581, OPR
ST
A
T
E
O
F
TE
X
A
S
VO
L
.
2
7
7
,
PG
.
5
7
2
,
D
R
CALLED 1.637 AC
CITY OF GEORGETOWN
VOL. 641, PG. 002, DR
LO
T
8
LO
T
1
N 87° 21' 56" E 140.00'
N 87° 39' 37" E
19.98'
S
0
2
°
3
7
'
4
8
"
E
1
7
9
.
9
5
'
S 87° 15' 33" W
19.97'
S 87° 22' 47" W 240.00'
N
0
2
°
3
6
'
3
1
"
W
2
4
0
.
8
7
'
N 88° 41' 00" E
34.86'
N
0
2
°
2
0
'
5
1
"
W
44
.
8
9
'
N 75° 59' 0
0
"
E
50.88'
N 87° 11' 18" E
14.95'
54
.
9
2
'
S
0
2
°
3
8
'
4
3
"
E
60
.
1
0
'
S
0
2
°
3
7
'
0
4
"
E
21
5
.
8
7
'
25
.
0
0
'
25.00'215.00'
312 SQ. FT.
ROW DEDICATION
1
:
35.35'
1
(
1.78'
PLAT NOTES:
1.UTILITY PROVIDERS FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT ARE:
WATER: CITY OF GEORGETOWN
WASTEWATER: CITY OF GEORGETOWN
ELECTRIC: CITY OF GEORGETOWN
2.INTENTIONALLY DELETED.
3.THERE ARE NO AREAS WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THIS SUBDIVISION IN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN AS DEFINED BY
FIRM MAP NUMBER 48491C0295E, EFFECTIVE DATE OF SEPTEMBER 26, 2008, AND LOMAR 13-06-1572P, EFFECTIVE
DATE FEBRUARY 26, 2015.
4.INTENTIONALLY DELETED.
5.INTENTIONALLY DELETED.
6.IN ORDER TO PROMOTE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM A STRUCTURE, THE SLAB ELEVATION SHOULD BE BUILT AT LEAST
ONE-FOOT ABOVE THE SURROUNDING GROUND, AND THE GROUND SHOULD BE GRADED AWAY FROM THE
STRUCTURE AT A SLOPE OF 1/2 INCH PER FOOT FOR A DISTANCE OF AT LEAST 10 FEET.
7.PARKLAND DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE BEING MET BY FEE-IN-LIEU.
8.THERE ARE NO HERITAGE TREES PER THE STANDARDS SET FORTH BY THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN ON THE SUBJECT
TRACT.
9.A 10-FOOT PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT IS RESERVED ALONG W 2ND STREET FRONTAGE.
10.THE MONUMENTS OF THIS PLAT HAVE BEEN ROTATED TO THE NAD 83/93 HARN - TEXAS CENTRAL ZONE AND NAVD
88.
11.INTENTIONALLY DELETED.
12.THE MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE PER NON-RESIDENTIAL LOT SHALL BE PURSUANT TO THE UDC AT THE TIME
OF SITE PLAN APPLICATION BASED ON THE ZONING DESIGNATION OF THE PROPERTY.
13.INTENTIONALLY DELETED.
14.THE LANDOWNER ASSUMES ALL RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED IN TH RIGHT-OFWAY, OR ROAD
WIDENING EASEMENTS. BY PLACING ANYTHING IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OR ROAD WIDENING EASEMENTS, THE
LANDOWNER INDEMNIFIES AND HOLDS THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, WILLIAMSON COUNTY, THEIR OFFICERS, AGENTS
AND EMPLOYEES HARMLESS FROM ANY LIABILITY OWING TO PROPERTY DEFECTS OR NEGLIGENCE NOT
ATTRIBUTABLE TO THEM AND ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS MAY BE REMOVED BY THE CITY AND/OR
COUNTY AND THAT THE OWNER OF THE IMPROVEMENTS WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE RELOCATION AND/OR
REPLACEMENT OF THE IMPROVEMENTS.
15.THE BUILDING OF ALL STREETS, ROADS, AND OTHER PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES AND ANY BRIDGES OR CULVERTS
NECESSARY TO BE CONSTRUCTED OR PLACED IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNERS OF THE TRACT OF LAND
COVERED BY THIS PLAT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS PRESCRIBED BY THE CITY OF
GEORGETOWN AND/OR WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS. NEITHER THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN NOR WILLIAMSON
COUNTY ASSUMES ANY OBLIGATION TO BUILD ANY OF THE STREETS, ROADS, OR OTHER PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES
SHOWN ON THIS PLAT OR OF CONSTRUCTING ANY OF THE BRIDGES OR DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS IN CONNECTION
THEREWITH. NEITHER THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN NOR WILLIAMSON COUNTY ASSUMES ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR
DRAINAGE WAYS OR EASEMENTS IN THE SUBDIVISION, OTHER THAN THOSE DRAINING OR PROTECTING THE ROAD
SYSTEM AND STREETS IN THEIR RESPECTIVE JURISDICTIONS.
16.NEITHER THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN NOR WILLIAMSON COUNTY ASSUMES ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ACCURACY
OF REPRESENTATIONS BY OTHER PARTIES IN THIS PLAT. FLOODPLAIN DATA, IN PARTICULAR, MAY CHANGE
DEPENDING ON SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENT. IT IS FURTHER UNDERSTOOD THAT THE OWNERS OF THE TRACT OF
LAND COVERED BY THIS PLAT MUST INSTALL AT THEIR OWN EXPENSE ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AND SIGNAGE
THAT MAY BE REQUIRED BEFORE THE STREETS IN THE SUBDIVISION HAVE FINALLY BEEN ACCEPTED FOR
MAINTENANCE BY THE CITY AND / OR COUNTY.
17.RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENTS FOR WIDENING ROADWAYS OR IMPROVING DRAINAGE SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE
LANDOWNER UNTIL ROAD OR DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ARE ACTUALLY CONSTRUCTED ON THE PROPERTY. THE
CITY AND/OR COUNTY HAVE THE RIGHT AT ANY TIME TO TAKE POSSESSION OF ANY ROAD WIDENING EASEMENT FOR
CONSTRUCTION, IMPROVEMENT, OR MAINTENANCE OF THE ADJACENT ROAD.
18.THIS PLAT IS SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN WATER CONSERVATION ORDINANCE.
19.THE SUBDIVISION SUBJECT TO THIS APPLICATION IS SUBJECT TO THE WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS OF THE CITY OF
GEORGETOWN.
20.A GEOLOGIC ASSESSMENT, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS, WAS
COMPLETED ON 07/10/2018 . ANY SPRINGS AND STREAMS AS IDENTIFIED IN THE GEOLOGIC ASSESSMENT ARE
SHOWN HEREIN.
ROW
OPR OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF
WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS
PUE
DR DEED RECORDS OF
WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS
CONCRETE MONUMENT
IRON ROD FOUND (1/2", OR AS NOTED)
CALCULATED POINT NOT SET
RIGHT-OF-WAY
PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
LEGEND
POB POINT OF BEGINNING
BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE TEXAS
COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983, CENTRAL ZONE
(NAD_83 (2011)). ALL DISTANCES SHOWN
HEREON ARE SURFACE VALUES REPRESENTED IN
U.S. SURVEY FEET BASED ON A GRID-TO-SURFACE
COMBINED ADJUSTMENT FACTOR OF 1.00013.
IH
-
3
5
W 2ND ST
S
A
U
S
T
I
N
A
V
E
W UNIVERSITY AVE
SITE
N
S
A
N
G
A
B
R
I
E
L
R
I
V
E
R
1
(
1.78'
1
:
35.35'
BENCHMARKS:
BM 37-62A - MAG NAIL WITH WASHER STAMPED "CONTROL POINT", SET
IN EDGE OF PAVEMENT AT THE INTERSECTION OF SOUTH AUSTIN
AVENUE AND WEST SECOND STREET . APPROXIMATELY 26 FEET EAST OF
CENTERLINE OF SOUTH AUSTIN AVENUE, AND APPROXIMATELY 30 FEET
SOUTH OF CENTERLINE OF WEST SECOND STREET.
GRID NORTHING: 10207029.89
GRID EASTING: 3131504.50
ELEV: 701.11' (NAVD 88. GEOID 09)
BM 37-62B - MAG NAIL WITH WASHER STAMPED "CONTROL POINT", SET
IN EDGE OF PAVEMENT AT THE INTERSECTION OF WEST SECOND STREET
AND SOUTH MAIN STREET. APPROXIMATELY 20 FEET SOUTH OF
CENTERLINE OF WEST SECOND STREET, AND APPROXIMATELY 46 FEET
WEST OF CENTERLINE OF SOUTH MAIN STREET.
GRID NORTHING: 10207048.98
GRID EASTING: 3131761.33
ELEV: 705.30' (NAVD 88, GEOID 09)
GEORGETOWN, TX 78626
STEGERBIZZELL.COM
>>ENGINEERS >>PLANNERS >>SURVEYORS
512.930.9412
SERVICES
METRO
ADDRESS 1978 S. AUSTIN AVENUE
WEB
DRAWN BY: SF REVIEWED BY: AR APPROVED BY: MEJOB No. 22629 DATE: 08/23/2018 SHEET of 2
FINAL PLAT OF THE
RIVERPLACE GEORGETOWN SUBDIVISION
LOT 1, BLOCK 1
BEING A RE-PLAT OF LOTS 2-7, PART OF LOT 8, AND A
PORTION OF FIRST STREET, OF BLOCK 2, CITY OF
GEORGETOWN
A 1.289 Acre Subdivision situated in the
Nicholas Porter Survey No. 497,
Patented in conflict with the Orville Perry Survey No. 10
Williamson County, Texas
Th
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
a
r
e
t
h
e
s
o
l
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
o
f
S
T
E
G
E
R
B
I
Z
Z
E
L
L
.
T
h
e
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
i
s
h
e
r
e
b
y
r
e
s
t
r
i
c
t
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
o
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
s
i
t
e
f
o
r
w
h
i
c
h
t
h
e
y
w
e
r
e
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
.
R
e
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
r
r
e
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
i
n
w
h
o
l
e
o
r
i
n
p
a
r
t
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
w
r
i
t
t
e
n
p
e
r
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
o
f
S
T
E
G
E
R
B
I
Z
Z
E
L
L
i
s
s
t
r
i
c
t
l
y
p
r
o
h
i
b
i
t
e
d
.
TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-181
TBPLS FIRM No.10003700
FP-2018-042
30'20'10'0'15'30'
GRAPHIC SCALE: 1" = 30'
DETAIL
(NOT TO SCALE)
OWNER:
WAAPF PROPERTIES, LLC
P.O. BOX 688
GEORGETOWN, TX 78627
ENGINEER/SURVEYOR:
STEGER BIZZELL
1978 S. AUSTIN AVE.
GEORGETOWN, TEXAS 78626
512-930-9412
TOTAL ACREAGE: 1.289 ACRES
TOTAL No. OF BLOCKS: 1
TOTAL No. OF LOTS: 1
LINEAR FEET OF STREETS: N/A
GEORGETOWN, TX
LOCATION MAP SCALE 1" = 2000'
1
W 2ND ST
AU
S
T
I
N
A
V
E
.
SEE DETAIL
P:
\
2
2
0
0
0
-
2
2
9
9
9
\
2
2
6
2
9
-
P
f
i
e
s
t
e
r
-
2
n
d
S
t
r
e
e
t
\
S
u
r
v
e
y
D
a
t
a
\
C
A
D
\
2
2
6
2
9
-
P
l
a
t
.
d
w
g
,
1
2
/
1
9
/
2
0
1
8
9
:
5
5
:
0
5
A
M
,
M
I
G
U
E
L
,
A
u
t
o
C
A
D
P
D
F
(
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
D
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
)
.
p
c
3
Page 11 of 83
GEORGETOWN, TX 78626
STEGERBIZZELL.COM
>>ENGINEERS >>PLANNERS >>SURVEYORS
512.930.9412
SERVICES
METRO
ADDRESS 1978 S. AUSTIN AVENUE
WEB
DRAWN BY: SF REVIEWED BY: AR APPROVED BY: MEJOB No. 22629 DATE: 08/23/2018 SHEET of 2
FINAL PLAT OF THE
RIVERPLACE GEORGETOWN SUBDIVISION
LOT 1, BLOCK 1
BEING A RE-PLAT OF LOTS 2-7, PART OF LOT 8, AND A
PORTION OF FIRST STREET, OF BLOCK 2, CITY OF
GEORGETOWN
A 1.289 Acre Subdivision situated in the
Nicholas Porter Survey No. 497,
Patented in conflict with the Orville Perry Survey No. 10
Williamson County, Texas
Th
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
a
r
e
t
h
e
s
o
l
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
o
f
S
T
E
G
E
R
B
I
Z
Z
E
L
L
.
T
h
e
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
i
s
h
e
r
e
b
y
r
e
s
t
r
i
c
t
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
o
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
s
i
t
e
f
o
r
w
h
i
c
h
t
h
e
y
w
e
r
e
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
.
R
e
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
r
r
e
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
i
n
w
h
o
l
e
o
r
i
n
p
a
r
t
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
w
r
i
t
t
e
n
p
e
r
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
o
f
S
T
E
G
E
R
B
I
Z
Z
E
L
L
i
s
s
t
r
i
c
t
l
y
p
r
o
h
i
b
i
t
e
d
.
TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-181
TBPLS FIRM No.10003700
FP-2018-042
I, JAMES M. CUMMINS , REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER IN THE STATE OF TEXAS,
DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SUBDIVISION IS IN THE EDWARDS AQUIFER RECHARGE
ZONE AND IS NOT ENCROACHED BY ZONE A FLOOD AREA, AS DENOTED HEREIN, AND
AS DEFINED BY FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION FLOOD HAZARD
BOUNDARY MAP, COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER 48491C0295E, EFFECTIVE DATE
SEPTEMBER 26, 2008, AND THAT EACH LOT CONFORMS TO THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN
REGULATIONS. THE FULLY DEVELOPED, CONCENTRATED STORMWATER RUNOFF
RESULTING FROM THE ONE HUNDRED (100) YEAR FREQUENCY STORM IS CONTAINED
WITHIN THE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS SHOWN AND/OR PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY
DEDICATED BY THIS PLAT.
TO CERTIFY WHICH, WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL AT GEORGETOWN, WILLIAMSON
COUNTY, TEXAS,
THIS______ DAY OF_______________ , 2019.
_____________________________
JAMES M. CUMMINS
REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
STATE OF TEXAS NO. 105952
STATE OF TEXAS {
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS
COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON {
I, MIGUEL A. ESCOBAR, REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF TEXAS,
DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT IS TRUE AND CORRECTLY MADE FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY
MADE ON THE GROUND OF THE PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED HEREON, AND THAT THERE
ARE NO APPARENT DISCREPANCIES, CONFLICTS, OVERLAPPING OF IMPROVEMENTS, VISIBLE
UTILITY LINES OR ROADS IN PLACE, EXCEPT A SHOWN ON THE ACCOMPANYING PLAT, AND
THAT THE CORNER MONUMENTS SHOWN THEREON WERE PROPERLY PLACED UNDER MY
SUPERVISION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS OF THE CITY OF
GEORGETOWN, TEXAS.
TO CERTIFY WHICH, WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL AT GEORGETOWN, WILLIAMSON COUNTY,
TEXAS,
THIS______ DAY OF_______________ , 2019.
__________________________________________
MIGUEL A. ESCOBAR, LSLS, RPLS
STATE OF TEXAS NO. 5630
STATE OF TEXAS {
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS
COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON {
I, WAAPF PROPERTIES LLC, OWNER OF THE CERTAIN 1.289 AC TRACT OF LAND SHOWN
HEREON AND DESCRIBED IN A DEED RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2018109083, OF
THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, AND DO HEREBY STATE THAT
THERE ARE NO LIEN HOLDERS OF THE CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND, AND DO HEREBY
RESUBDIVIDE, AMEND, ETC. SAID TRACT AS SHOWN HEREON, AND DO HEREBY
CONSENT TO ALL PLAT NOTE REQUIREMENTS SHOWN HEREON, AND DO HEREBY
DEDICATE TO THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN THE STREETS, ALLEYS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY,
EASEMENTS AND PUBLIC PLACES SHOWN HEREON FOR SUCH PUBLIC PURPOSES AS THE
CITY OF GEORGETOWN MAY DEEM APPROPRIATE. THIS SUBDIVISION IS TO BE KNOWN
AS:
"RIVERPLACE GEORGETOWN SUBDIVISION"
TO CERTIFY WHICH, WITNESS BY MY HAND THIS______ DAY OF______________ , 2019.
WAAPF PROPERTIES, LLC
________________________________________ _________________
BY: AUSTIN PFIESTER DATE
GENERAL PARTNER
GEORGETOWN, TEXAS 78627
STATE OF TEXAS {
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS
COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON {
BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED, A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID COUNTY AND
STATE, ON THIS DAY PERSONALLY APPEARED AUSTIN PFEISTER, KNOWN TO ME TO BE
THE PERSON WHOSE NAME IS SUBSCRIBED TO THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT.
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE THIS______ DAY OF____________ , 2019.
_______________________________________________
NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES ON: ________________________
THIS SUBDIVISION TO BE KNOWN AS "RIVERPLACE GEORGETOWN" HAS BEEN ACCEPTED
AND APPROVED FOR FILING OF RECORD WITH THE COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON, TEXAS,
ACCORDING TO THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE GEORGETOWN PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION ON THIS______ DAY OF_______________ , 2019, A.D.
_____________________________ ________________
JOSH SCHROEDER, CHAIRMAN 02/19 DATE
______________________________ ________________
TIM BARGAINER, SECRETARY 02/18 DATE
STATE OF TEXAS {
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS
COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON {
I, NANCY RISTER, CLERK OF THE COUNTY COURT OF SAID COUNTY, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING
INSTRUMENT IN WRITING, WITH ITS CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION WAS FILED FOR RECORD IN MY OFFICE
ON THE ____________ DAY OF __________, 2019, A.D., AT ______ O’CLOCK, __.M., AND DULY RECORDED
THIS THE ____________ DAY OF ____________, 2019, A.D., AT ___ O’CLOCK, __.M., IN THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC
RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY IN DOCUMENT NO. _______________.
TO CERTIFY WHICH, WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL AT THE COUNTY COURT OF SAID COUNTY, AT MY OFFICE IN
GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, THE DATE LAST SHOWN ABOVE WRITTEN.
______________________
NANCY RISTER, CLERK
COUNTY COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS
BY: ______________________________, DEPUTY
BASED UPON THE ABOVE REPRESENTATIONS OF THE ENGINEER OR SURVEYOR WHOSE
SEAL IS AFFIXED HERETO, AND AFTER REVIEW OF THE PLAT AS REPRESENTED BY THE
SAID ENGINEER OR SURVEYOR, I FIND THAT THIS PLAT COMPLIES THE REQUIREMENTS
OF CHAPTER 15.44, FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION, OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN
MUNICIPAL CODE. THIS CERTIFICATION IS MADE SOLELY UPON SUCH REPRESENTATION
AND SHOULD NOT RELIED UPON FOR VERIFICATIONS OF THE FACTS ALLEGED. THE CITY
OF GEORGETOWN DISCLAIMS ANY RESPONSIBILITY TO ANY MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC OR
INDEPENDENT VERIFICATIONS OF THE REPRESENTATIONS, FACTUAL OR OTHERWISE,
CONTAINED IN THIS PLAT AND THE DOCUMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH IT.
__________________________________________________
GLEN HOLCOMB DATE
CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL AND FLOODPLAIN COORDINATOR
CITY OF GEORGETOWN
2
PERIMETER DESCRIPTION
DESCRIPTION OF A 1.289 ACRE TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NICHOLAS PORTER
SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 497, PATENTED IN CONFLICT WITH THE ORVILLE PERRY
SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 10, WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING OUT OF BLOCK 2,
CITY OF GEORGETOWN, SAID 1.289 ACRE TRACT BEING CONVEYED TO WAAPF
PROPERTIES, LLC AND REBECCA SHEPPERD KAUFFMAN PFIESTER, TRUSTEE OF
REBECCA SHEPPERD KAUFFMAN PFIESTER 2006 TRUST BY GENERAL WARRANTY DEED
OF RECORD IN DOCUMENT NO. 2014007300, OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS,
WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, SAID 1.289 ACRE TRACT OF LAND BEING MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING, at a 1/2-inch iron rod with cap stamped “CCC 4835”, found in the east right-of-way
line of Austin Avenue, formerly known as Brushy Street, a variable width right-of-way, of record
in the MAP OF GEORGETOWN, in Volume 5, Page 211, Deed Records, Williamson County, Texas,
at its intersection with the south line of a tract of land conveyed to the State of Texas in a
Right-of-Way Deed of record in Volume 277, Page 572, Deed Records, Williamson County,
Texas, for the northwest corner of the herein described tract;
THENCE, North 88°41'00" East, with the south line of said State of Texas tract, a distance of
34.86 feet, to a concrete monument found broken;
THENCE, North 02°20'51" West, with the east line of said State of Texas tract, a distance of
44.89 feet, to a 1/2-inch iron rod found;
THENCE, crossing a portion of First Street, an unimproved roadway, with no dedication found to
date, the following three (3) courses and distances:
1.North 75°59'00" East, a distance of 50.88 feet, to a 1/2-inch iron rod with cap stamped
“COALTER 1481” found;
2.North 87°11'18" East, a distance of 14.95 feet, to a 1/2-inch iron rod with cap stamped
“COALTER 1481” found;
3.South 02°38'43" East, a distance of 54.92 feet, to a 1/2-inch iron rod with illegible cap
found;
THENCE, crossing said Block 2, the following two (2) courses and distances:
1.South 02°37'04" East, a distance of 60.10 feet, to a 1/2-inch iron rod found;
2.North 87°21'56" East, a distance of 140.00 feet, to a 1/2-inch iron rod with cap stamped
“FOREST 1847”, found;
THENCE, crossing a portion of Main Street, an unimproved, variable width roadway, of record in
said MAP OF GEORGETOWN, the following two (2) courses and distances:
1.North 87°39'37" East, a distance of 19.98 feet, to a 1/2-inch iron rod with cap stamped
“FOREST 1847”, found;
2.South 02°37'48" East, a distance of 179.95 feet, to a 1/2-inch iron rod with cap stamped
“COALTER 1481”, found in the north line of West 2nd Street, a 60-foot wide roadway of
record in said MAP OF GEORGETOWN;
THENCE, with the north line of said West 2nd Street, the following two (2) courses and
distances:
1.South 87°15'33" West, a distance of 19.97 feet, to a 1/2-inch iron rod with cap stamped
“FOREST 1847”, found;
2.South 87°22'47" West, a distance of 240.00 feet, to a point, from which a 1/2-inch iron rod
found bears North 55°02'29" East, a distance of 1.78 feet;
THENCE, North 02°36'31" West, with the east right-of-way line of said Austin Avenue, a
distance of 240.87 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING, and containing 1.289 acres of land, more
or less, within these metes and bounds.
I, SOFIA NELSON, PLANNING DIRECTOR OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, DO
HEREBY CERTIFY THIS PLAT IS APPROVED FOR FILING OF RECORD WITH THE COUNTY
CLERK OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS.
____________________________________ ________________
SOFIA NELSON , PLANNING DIRECTOR DATE
P:
\
2
2
0
0
0
-
2
2
9
9
9
\
2
2
6
2
9
-
P
f
i
e
s
t
e
r
-
2
n
d
S
t
r
e
e
t
\
S
u
r
v
e
y
D
a
t
a
\
C
A
D
\
2
2
6
2
9
-
P
l
a
t
.
d
w
g
,
1
2
/
1
9
/
2
0
1
8
9
:
5
5
:
0
6
A
M
,
M
I
G
U
E
L
,
A
u
t
o
C
A
D
P
D
F
(
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
D
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
)
.
p
c
3
Page 12 of 83
Page 13 of 83
Riverplace GeorgetownFP-2018-042
Planning & Zoning Commission
March 5, 2019
1Page 14 of 83
Item(s) under consideration
•FP-2018-042
–Replat of Lots 2-7, part of Lot 8, and a portion of First Street, of Block 2, City of Georgetown, consisting of approximately 1.289 acres, located at 109 W 2nd St (FP-2018-042).
Page 15 of 83
Location Map
3Page 16 of 83
Aerial Map
4Page 17 of 83
Public Notifications
5Page 18 of 83
Public Notifications
•26 property owners, who are within 200’ of the subject property, were notified about the public hearing;
•Notice of the public hearing was published in the Sun News on February 13, 2019; and
•Signs were posted on the property in accordance with the UDC.
•To date, staff has received 1 written comments in favor and 0 in opposition of the request.
6Page 19 of 83
Summary:
•Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Replat of Lots 2-7, part of Lot 8, and a portion of First Street, of Block 2, City of Georgetown, consisting of approximately 1.289 acres, located at 109 W 2nd St (FP-2018-042)
Page 20 of 83
City of Georgetown, Texas
Planning and Zoning
March 5, 2019
S UB J E C T:
P ublic Hearing and pos s ible ac tion on a request to rezone approximately 0.23 acres out of Unit 2 Dawn S t
Ext of the Williams Addition, also being out of the Nicholas P orter S urvey, Abs trac t No. 497, loc ated at
2302 Dawn Drive, from the O ffice (O F ) to R es idential S ingle-F amily (R S ) zoning dis tric t (R EZ-2018-
030). Michael P atros ki, P lanner
IT E M S UMMARY:
Overview of the Applicant's Request:
T he applic ant is requesting to rezone the O ffic e (O F ) zoned property, with an existing residential s tructure,
to R es idential S ingle-F amily (R S ).
S taff's Analysis:
S taff has reviewed the request in ac cordance with the Unified Development C ode (UDC ) and other
applicable codes. S taff has determined that the proposed request meets 5 of the 5 c riteria es tablished in
UDC S ec tion 3.06.030 for a Zoning Map Amendment, as outlined in the attached S taff R eport.
Public Comments:
As required by the Unified Development C ode (UDC ), all property owners within 200 feet of the subject
property were notified of the request (20 notices mailed), a legal notic e advertising the public hearing was
placed in the S un Newspaper (F ebruary 17, 2019) and s igns were posted on-s ite. As of the publication
date of this report, staff has rec eived 0 written c omments in favor and 0 in opposition of the request.
F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
None. T he applicant has paid the required application fees .
S UB MIT T E D B Y:
Mic hael P atroski
AT TAC H ME N T S:
Description Type
REZ-2018-030 - P&Z Staff Report Cover Memo
Exhibit 1-Location Map Backup Material
Exhibit 2-Future Land Use Map Backup Material
Exhibit 3- Zoning Map Backup Material
Exhibit 4-Design and development s tandards of the (RS Zoning
District)Backup Material
Exhibit 5- Letter of Intent Backup Material
Pres entation Pres entation
Page 21 of 83
Planning and Zoning Commission
Planning Department Staff Report
REZ-2018-030
2302 Dawn Drive Page 1 of 8
Report Date: March 1, 2019
Case No: REZ-2018-030
Project Planner: Michael Patroski, Planner
Item Details
Project Name: 2302 Dawn Drive
Project Location: 2302 Dawn Drive, within City Council district No. 2.
Total Acreage: 0.23 acres
Legal Description: 0.23 acres out of Unit 2 Dawn St Ext of the Williams Addition, also being out
of the Nicholas Porter Survey, Abstract No. 497
Applicant: Victor and Alonda Cepeda
Property Owner: Victor and Alonda Cepeda
Request: The applicant is requesting to rezone the OF-Office zoned property, with an
existing residential structure, to Residential Single-Family (RS).
Case History: This is the first public hearing of this request.
Page 22 of 83
Planning Department Staff Report
REZ-2018-030
2302 Dawn Drive Page 2 of 8
Overview of Applicant’s Request
The applicant is requesting to rezone the Office (OF) zoned property, with an existing residential
structure, to Residential Single-Family (RS).
Site Information
Location:
The subject property is located at 2302 Dawn Drive. This property is located near the Dawn Drive and
Golden Oaks Drive intersection, one block north of Williams Drive.
Physical and Natural Features:
The subject property currently consist of a 1, 216 square foot residential home with a detached accessory
structure located in the rear of the property.
Future Land Use and Zoning Designations:
The subject property has a Moderate Density Residential Future Land Use designation. It is currently
zoned Office (OF). It is also situated within the 2017 Williams Drive Study Area.
Surrounding Properties:
The subject property is adjacent to Residential Single-Family to the east and south, and Office to the
west and north. There is also C-1 Local Commercial zoning located nearby to the west of the subject
property.
The current zoning, Future Land Use designation, and existing uses of the adjacent properties to the
north, south, east and west are outlined in the table below:
DIRECTION ZONING DISTRICT FUTURE LAND USE EXISTING USE
North Dawn Drive.
Office (OF)
Moderate Density
Residential (MDR) Residential Structure
South Residential Single-
Family (RS)
Mixed Use Neighborhood
Center (MUNC) Undeveloped
East Residential Single-
Family (RS)
Moderate Density
Residential (MDR) Undeveloped
West Office (OF) Moderate Density
Residential (MDR) Residential Structure
Page 23 of 83
Planning Department Staff Report
REZ-2018-030
2302 Dawn Drive Page 3 of 8
Property History:
The subject property has been owned by the applicant’s family since 2015. The residential home located
on the subject property was built in 1978 and has always been used for residential purposes. The subject
property is classified as residential with the Williamson Center Appraisal District due to its current use,
but zoned office based on the City of Georgetown adpoted Zoning Map. The property was annexed
into the city limits in 1974 (Annexation Ordinance 1974-08). The current zoning district was a result of
the conversion of the previous Office and Service uses (RM-3) zoning district that converted to the
Office (OF) District in 2003 upon adoption of the UDC.
Comprehensive Plan Guidance
Future Land Use Map:
The Moderate-Density Residential category comprises single family neighborhoods that can be
accommodated at a density ranging between 3.1 and 6 dwelling units per gross acre, with housing
types including small-lot detached and attached single-family dwellings (such as townhomes).
As in the preceding category, the Moderate-Density Residential category may also support
complementary non-residential uses along arterial roadways such as neighborhood-serving retail,
Georgetown Health
Foundation (C-1)
Chevron
(C-1)
Coldwell
Banker (OF)
Tortoise and
the Hair (OF) Residential
Residential
Page 24 of 83
Planning Department Staff Report
REZ-2018-030
2302 Dawn Drive Page 4 of 8
office, institutional, and civic uses, although such uses may not be depicted on Future Land Use Map.
Standards should be established to maximize compatibility of these uses with adjacent land uses,
minimize traffic congestion and overloading of public infrastructure, and also ensure a high standard
of site, landscape, and architectural design.
Growth Tier:
The subject property is located within Growth Tier 1A. Tier 1A is that portion of the city where
infrastructure systems are in place, or can be economically provided, and where the bulk of the city’s
growth should be guided over the near term. Within Tier 1A, the city is called on to conduct
assessments of public facility conditions and capacities, and to prioritize short and long term capital
investments so as to ensure that infrastructure capacity is sufficient to serve development intensities as
indicated on the Future Land Use Map and in the zoning districts.
Other Master Plans: Williams Drive Study
The Williams Drive Study recommends a mix of uses within the Centers Area ranging between Urban
Mixed Use, to Highway Commercial, to low to high density residential.
Specifically, the Study recommends Single -Family for this property and area.
Page 25 of 83
Planning Department Staff Report
REZ-2018-030
2302 Dawn Drive Page 5 of 8
Utilities
The subject property is located within the City’s service area for water, wastewater, and electric. It is
anticipated that there is adequate water and wastewater capacity to serve the subject property at this
time.
Transportation
The subject property has road frontage along Dawn Drive, one block north from Williams Drive.
Williams Drive is identified as an existing Major Arterial in the Overall Thoroughfare Plan. Major
arterials connect major traffic generators and land use connections, and serve much larger traffic
volumes over greater distances.
Proposed Zoning District
The Residential Single-Family District (RS) is intended for areas of medium density with a minimum
lot size of 5,500 square feet. The RS District contains standards for development that maintain single-
family neighborhood characteristics. The District may be located within proximity of neighborhood-
friendly commercial and public services and protected from incompatible uses. All housing types in
the RS District shall use the lot, dimensional and design standards of the District.
Permitted uses in this district include Group Home, Single-Family Detached, and Minor Utilities.
Other uses such as Church, Day Care, Home Based Business, Park (Neighborhood) School, and Single-
Family Attached are permitted subject to specific design limitations. Certain land uses, including
Activity Center, Bed and Breakfast, Day Care (Group), General Office, Halfway House, Hospice
Facility, and School (middle), require a Special Use Permit (SUP). Exhibit 4 contains a comprehensive
list of RS district permitted uses and development standards.
Page 26 of 83
Planning Department Staff Report
REZ-2018-030
2302 Dawn Drive Page 6 of 8
Intergovernmental and Interdepartmental Review
The proposed rezoning request was reviewed by all applicable City Departments to determine the
appropriateness of the requested zoning on the subject property. No comments were issued regarding
the zoning request.
Approval Criteria
Staff has reviewed the proposed rezoning request and has found that it complies with the criteria
established in UDC Section 3.06.030 for a Zoning Map Amendment, as outlined below:
APPROVAL CRITERIA FINDINGS STAFF COMMENTS
1. The application is complete
and the information contained
within the application is
sufficient and correct enough
to allow adequate review and
final action.
Complies An application must provide the
necessary information to review and
make a knowledgeable decision in
order for staff to schedule an
application for consideration by the
Planning and Zoning Commission and
City Council. This application was
reviewed by staff and deemed to be
complete.
2. The zoning change is
consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan.
Complies The City’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan
encourages the development of a mix
of complimentary uses, including
limited retail, personal service, office,
civic, and single-to multi-family
residential uses. The requested zoning
is consistent with this plan as the
proposed zoning district allows small-
lot detached and attached single-family
dwellings (such as townhomes).
Because of this, the Residential Single-
Family (RS) zoning district is
considered to be compatible with the
Moderate Density Residential Future
Land Use designation. Additionally,
the 2017 Williams Drive Study has
included the subject property and its
adjacent neighbors to have the Future
Land Use designated as Single-Family.
3. The zoning change promotes
the health, safety or general
welfare of the City and the
safe orderly, and healthful
development of the City.
Complies The requested Residential Single-
Family (RS) zoning district would not
adversely affect the health, safety, or
welfare of residents. This zoning
district, should it be approved, would
allow the subject property to
Page 27 of 83
Planning Department Staff Report
REZ-2018-030
2302 Dawn Drive Page 7 of 8
APPROVAL CRITERIA FINDINGS STAFF COMMENTS
immediately come into conformance,
considering there is an existing
residential structure. In addition, the
requested zoning will assist in a
transition between the Office/High
Density land use to the west of the
subject area and the established single
family neighborhood adjacent to the
subject property.
4. The zoning change is
compatible with the present
zoning and conforming uses of
nearby property and with the
character of the neighborhood.
Complies The Residential Single-Family (RS)
district is compatible with the
surrounding uses and character of the
area. The subject property is adjacent to
an existing residential neighborhood.
Additionally, the Future Land Use for
the surrounding area is MDR-
Moderate Density Residential, which
allow for small-lot detached and
attached single-family dwellings.
5. The property to be rezoned is
suitable for uses permitted by
the District that would be
applied by the proposed
amendment.
Complies The applicant is proposing to rezone to
RS-Residential Single Family. There is
currently a residential structure located
on the property. Thus, the property is
suitable for the uses permitted in the
RS zoning district.
Based on the findings listed above, staff finds that the requested Residential Single-Family (RS) zoning
district complies with the approval criteria for a Zoning Map Amendment. If approved, the subject
property would adequately match the cities 2030 Comprehensive Plan’s Future Land Use and the 2017
Williams Drive Study Future Land Use. Additionally, being that an existing residential structure is
located on the subject property, the change in zoning would match the current sites characteristics as
well as conforming to adjacent properties.
Meetings Schedule
March 5, 2019 – Planning and Zoning Commission
March 26, 2019 – City Council First Reading of the Ordinance
April 9, 2019 – City Council Second Reading of the Ordinance
Public Notification
As required by the Unified Development Code, all property owners within a 200-foot radius of the
subject property were notified of the Zoning Map Amendment request (20 notices), a legal notice
Page 28 of 83
Planning Department Staff Report
REZ-2018-030
2302 Dawn Drive Page 8 of 8
advertising the public hearing was placed in the Sun Newspaper (February 17, 2019) and signs were
posted on-site. To date, staff has received 0 written comments regarding the request.
Attachments
REZ-2018-30- P&Z Staff Report
Exhibit 1 – Location Map
Exhibit 2 – Future Land Use Map
Exhibit 3 – Zoning Map
Exhibit 4 – Design and development standards of the [RS Zoning District]
Exhibit 5 – Letter of Intent
Presentation
Page 29 of 83
DAW
N DR
W
IL
LIA
M
S D
R
R I V E R B E N D D R
P
A
R
K L
N
PO W ER RD
NORTHWEST
B
L
V
D
R A N C H R D
P A R K W A Y S T
M
ESQ
UITE LN
E CENTRAL DR
W
ESTW
OOD LN
E JANIS DR
PARKER DR
GOLDEN O A K S D R
DUN M AN DR
O
A
K L
N
TERRYLN
PATTI DR
JUDY D R
THORN T ONLN
SHANNON LN
N
O
RTHWOODDR
C O U N T R Y C L UBRD
N IH 35 SB
TANGLEWOOD DR
FONTANA DRTIFFANY L N
GARDEN VILLA DR
W
I
L
L
O
W
L
N
G A R D E N M E A D O W D R
PARK E R C I R W JANIS DR
W CENTR AL D R
G
A
B
RIEL
VIE
W
D
R
KIMBERLY ST
RIV E R Y B L V D
BOOTYS CRO S S I N G R D
BOB W
HITE LN
VILL
A
G
E
D
R P A R K M E A D O W B L V D
G O L D E N O A K SRD
P
O
W
E
R
C
I
R
MELISSACT
RYAN LN
T H O R N T O N C V
O
AK LN
M
E
S
Q
UIT
E L
N
REZ-2018-030Exhibit #1
Coordinate S ystem : Texas S tat e Plane /C ent ral Z one/NA D 83/US F eetCartographic Data For G eneral P lanning Purposes Only
¯
Location Map LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
0 500 1,000Fee t
Page 30 of 83
DAW
N DR
WILLIAMS DR
TERRY LN
GOLDEN OAKS DR
PARK LN
W
EST
W
O
O
D LN
O
AK LN
PO W ER RD
RIV E R B E N D D R
MESQUITE LN
T H O R N T O N C V
Coord inate System: Texa s State Plane/Central Zon e/N AD 8 3/US FeetCartographic Da ta For General Planning Purp os es Only
¯
Futur e Land Use / Overall Transportation Plan
Exhibit #2
RE Z-201 8-03 0
Legend
Thoroughfare
Future Land Use
Institutiona l
Regional Com me rcia l
Com mu nity Commercial
Emp loym ent Center
Low Den sity Re sidential
Min ing
Mixed Use Co mm unity
Mixed Use Ne ighb o rh ood Cen ter
Mode rate Density Reside n tial
Op e n Sp ace
Specialty M ixed Use Are a
Ag / Rura l Re sid entia l
Existing Co lle ctor
Existing Freeway
Existing Ma jor Arterial
Existing Minor Arterial
Existing Ra m p
Pro p ose d Collector
Pro p ose d F re e way
Pro p se d Fron tage Ro a d
Pro p ose d M ajor Arte rial
Pro p ose d M inor Arte rial
Pro p ose d Railroad
Hig h Density Residen tial
Legend
Sit eParcelsCity Lim itsGeorgetown ETJ
0 250 500125Fe et
Page 31 of 83
DAW
N DR
WILLIAMS DR
TERRY LN
GOLDEN OAKS DR
PARK LN
W
EST
W
O
O
D LN
O
AK LN
PO W ER RD
RIV E R B E N D D R
MESQUITE LN
T H O R N T O N C V
Zoning InformationREZ-2018-030Exhibit #3
Co o rd inate System : Te xas S tate Plane/Ce ntral Z one /NAD 83/US Fe etCartographic D ata For Gener al Planning P ur po ses Only
LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
¯
0 250 500125FeetPage 32 of 83
Minimum Lot Size = 5,500 square feet Front Setback = 20 feet Bufferyard = 10 feet with plantings
Minimum Lot Width = 45 feet Side Setback = 6 feet when non-residential develops
Corner Lot Width = 55 feet Rear Setback = 10 feet adjacent to residential
Maximum Building Height = 35 feet Side/Rear Street Setback = 15 feet
Street Facing Garage Setback = 25 feet
Unloaded Street Setback = 20 feet
Allowed by Right Subject to Limitations Special Use Permit (SUP) Required
Group Home (<7 residents)Church (with columbarium)Accessory Dwelling Unit
Single-family Detached Day Care (family home)Activity Center (youth/senior)
Utilities (Minor)Golf Course Bed and Breakfast (with events)
Home Based Business Cemetary/Columbaria/Mausoleum
Nature Preserve/Community Garden Community Center
Neighborhood Amenity Center Day Care (Group)
Park (Neighborhood)Emergency Services Station
School (Elementary)General Office
Single-family Attached Halfway House
Utilities (Intermediate)Hospice Facility
Wireless Transmission Facility (<41')Rooming/Boarding House
School (Middle)
Residential Single-Family (RS) District
District Development Standards
Specific Uses Allowed within the District
Page 33 of 83
Page 34 of 83
1
2302 Dawn Drive
REZ-2018-030
Planning & Zoning Commission
March 5, 2019
Page 35 of 83
Items under consideration
2
REZ-2018-030 –Rezoning Request
Public Hearing and possible action on a request to
rezone approximately 0.23 acres out of Unit 2 Dawn
St Ext of the Williams Addition, also being out of the
Nicholas Porter Survey, Abstract No. 497, located at
2302 Dawn Drive, from the Office (OF) to Residential
Single-Family (RS) zoning district (REZ-2018-030).
Page 36 of 83
Location Map
3Page 37 of 83
Zoning Map
Page 38 of 83
Future Land Use
Page 39 of 83
6
Aerial
Page 40 of 83
•The Residential Single-Family District (RS) is intended for areas of
medium density with a minimum lot size of 5,500 square feet. The
RS District contains standards for development that maintain single-
family neighborhood characteristics. The District may be located
within proximity of neighborhood-friendly commercial and public
services and protected from incompatible uses. All housing types in
the RS District shall use the lot, dimensional and design standards
of the District.
o Max height 35 ft
o Min lot width 45 ft
o Side setback 6 ft
o Rear Setback 10 ft
Residential Single Family (RS)
7Page 41 of 83
Residential Single Family (RS)
Page 42 of 83
UDC Section 3.06.030. The P&Z shall consider the
following approval criteria for zoning changes:
Criteria For Rezoning Consistent Inconsistent Neutral
The application is complete and the information
contained within the application is sufficient and correct
enough to allow adequate review and final action; X
The zoning change is consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan;X
The zoning change promotes the health, safety or
general welfare of the City and the safe orderly, and
healthful development of the City; X
The zoning change is compatible with the present zoning
and conforming uses of nearby property and with the
character of the neighborhood; and
X
The property to be rezoned is suitable for uses permitted
by the district that would be applied by the proposed
amendment. X
9Page 43 of 83
13
Summary
•Public Hearing and possible action on a request to rezone
approximately 0.23 acres out of Unit 2 Dawn St Ext of the
Williams Addition, also being out of the Nicholas Porter
Survey, Abstract No. 497, located at 2302 Dawn Drive, from
the Office (OF) to Residential Single-Family (RS) zoning
district (REZ-2018-030).
•Per UDC Section 3.06.020, the Planning and Zoning
Commission shall hold a Public Hearing… and make a
recommendation to the City Council
Page 44 of 83
10
Public Notifications
Page 45 of 83
12
Public Notifications
•20 property owners,who are within 200’of the subject
property to be rezoned,were notified about the public hearing.
To date,staff has received zero (0)written comments in favor
and zero (0)in opposition to the request.
•Notice of the public hearing was published in the Sun News
on February 17,2019;and
•Signs were posted on the property in accordance with the
UDC.
Page 46 of 83
City of Georgetown, Texas
Planning and Zoning
March 5, 2019
S UB J E C T:
P ublic Hearing and pos s ible ac tion on a S ubdivis ion Varianc e from the S idewalk C onstruc tion requirement
pursuant to S ec tion 12.07 of the Unified Development C ode, for the property located at 716 S I H 35,
bearing the legal des cription 4.428 acres of R ivery P H 1 Block B, Lot 5E, (2019-1-WAV). Mic hael
P atroski, P lanner
IT E M S UMMARY:
Overview of the Applicant's Request:
T he applic ant is requesting a variance from the S idewalk C ons truction requirement pursuant to S ec tion
12.02.030, whic h requires a sidewalk to be c onstruc ted along S I H-35 between 750 and 708 S I H-35
(approximately 150 linear feet). T he requested varianc e is to waive the s idewalk requirement.
S taff Analysis:
S taff has reviewed the request in ac cordance with the Unified Development C ode (UDC ) and other
applicable codes. S taff has determined that the proposed request does not meet four of the five c riteria
es tablished in UDC S ection 3.22.060 for a S ubdivision Variance, as outlined in the attac hed S taff R eport.
Public Comments:
As required by the Unified Development C ode (UDC ), all property owners within 200 feet of the subject
property were notified of the request (6 notic es mailed), a legal notice advertis ing the public hearing was
placed in the S un Newspaper (F ebruary 17, 2019) and s igns were posted on-s ite. As of the publication
date of this report, staff has rec eived 0 written c omments in favor and 0 in opposition of the request.
F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
None. T he applicant has paid the required application fees .
S UB MIT T E D B Y:
Mic hael P atroski, P lanner
AT TAC H ME N T S:
Description Type
2019-1-WAV - P&Z Staff Report Cover Memo
Exhibit 1-Location Map Backup Material
Exhibit 2-Letter of Intent Backup Material
Exhibit 3-Concept Plan Backup Material
Exhibit 4-Public Comments Backup Material
Pres entation Pres entation
Page 47 of 83
Planning and Zoning Commission
Planning Department Staff Report
2019-1-WAV
Pet Paradise – Subdivision Variance Page 1 of 7
Report Date: March 1, 2019
File No: 2019-1-WAV
Project Planner: Michael Patroski, Planner
Item Details
Project Name: Pet Paradise
Project Location: 716 S IH-35, within City Council district No. 2
Total Acreage: 4.428
Legal Description: 4.428 acres consisting of Lot 5E, Block B, Rivery PH1
Applicant: Halff Associates, In. c/o Robert W. Sholz
Property Owner: SCF RC Funding IV LLC
Request: Subdivision Variance from the Sidewalk Network Connections Requirements
pursuant to Section 12.07 of the Unified Development Code.
Case History: This is the first public hearing of this request.
Location Map
Page 48 of 83
Planning Department Staff Report
2019-1-WAV
Pet Paradise – Subdivision Variance Page 2 of 7
Overview of Applicant’s Request
The applicant is requesting a subdivision variance from the Sidewalk Network Connections
Requirements pursuant to Section 12.07 of the Unified Development Code, which requires a sidewalk
(approximately 150 linear feet) to be constructed along S IH-35 between 750 and 708 S IH-35. The
requested variance is to waive the sidewalk requirement.
The applicant has stated four (4) reasons for their variance request:
1. Unnecessary Hardship - The subject site is encumbered with an existing wet pond with a
retaining wall along the eastern property line. There is a slope of approximately 23% from the
frontage road to the retaining wall. At the time of design and construction of the water quality
pond, no provisions for a sidewalk were contemplated by the designers.
2. No Detrimental Effects -There are no existing sidewalks along IH-35 for the adjacent properties.
Additionally, given the slope of the property, construction of a sidewalk at this location would
not be prudent in the protection of health, safety, or welfare of the general public.
3. Unique Conditions - The wet pond retaining wall, concrete flume, and steep slopes apply only
to this particular site within this area.
4. No Substantial Conflicts with Comprehensive Plan - At the time that Rivery development
commenced and the existing wet pond was constructed, the Texas Department of
Transportation (TxDOT) did not allow public sidewalks on their frontage roads.
Site Information
Location:
The site is located at 716 S IH-35 with access to Rivery Driveway. The site is situated between 750 and
708 S IH-35. The site is currently zoned C-3 General Commercial and has a Future Land Use designation
of Regional Commercial (RC).
Physical Characteristics:
The site is 4.428 acres with frontage along Rivery Driveway and S IH-35. Currently located on the
subject property are multiple trees, a pond, and a pond wall.
Page 49 of 83
Planning Department Staff Report
2019-1-WAV
Pet Paradise – Subdivision Variance Page 3 of 7
Aerial Map
Background
The applicant has submitted a Site Development Plan to develop a commercial development at 716 S
IH-35. Before the Site Development Plan can be approved, a request for a variance from the sidewalk
network connection regulations has been submitted to waive the 6’ (six-foot) sidewalk requirement
along S IH-35. The City of Georgetown’s Sidewalk Master Plan calls for sidewalk connectivity along S
IH-35 and Rivery Driveway, utilizing city efforts to fill in “gaps” throughout the city. The purpose of
Sidewalk Master Plan is to provide adequate sidewalks along frontage roads to provide pedestrian
access to commercial property from other property and nearby residential neighborhoods, thus
allowing residents of Georgetown alternate modes of transportation throughout the city.
Sidewalks along the IH-35 frontage road became a requirement when the City became an urban area.
Because of this, there are a number of developed property without sidewalks and where the City has
allocated funding for the construction of sidewalks, such as the segment between Leander Road and
Wolf Ranch Town Center. UDC Section 12.07 requires that sidewalks be constructed on both sides of
all streets, including frontage roads consistent with the Construction Manual and in conformance with
the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
Page 50 of 83
Planning Department Staff Report
2019-1-WAV
Pet Paradise – Subdivision Variance Page 4 of 7
The site has an estimated 150’ frontage along S IH-35. There is an existing pond located on the property
with a pond wall an estimated 62’ from the roadway. The property located between the roadway and
pond wall declines at an average slope of 23%.
The applicant wishes to waive the sidewalk requirement along S IH-35. The applicant has been made
aware that according to the Sidewalk Master Plan, Sidewalks will not be required for sites with unique
and extraordinary conditions. These sites may qualify for alternative routes, payments-in-lieu of
construction, or delays in construction.
Utilities
The subject site is located within the City’s service area for water, wastewater, and electricity. It is
anticipated that there is adequate water and wastewater capacity at this time to serve this property by
existing capacity.
Transportation
The subject site has frontage along Rivery Driveway and Major Arterial Roadway S IH-35. The frontage
along S IH-35 is an estimated 150 feet. Sidewalk connection along Rivery Driveway is proposed in
accordance with the UDC and Sidewalk Master Plan.
Approval Criteria
According to the UDC, a subdivision variance may be approved, conditionally approved, or
disapproved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Approval requires a super-majority vote by the
Commission. At least four (4) of the following factors are required for approval:
SUBDIVISION VARIANCE
CRITERIA
FINDINGS COMMENTS
That the granting of the
variance will not be detrimental
to the public health, safety or
welfare or injurious to other
property in the area or to the
City in administering this Code.
Does Not Comply
The waiving of the requirement for
sidewalk construction at this location
appears to have a detrimental impact on
the public health, safety, and welfare of the
community in the following ways:
Without construction of the sidewalk-
pedestrians, cyclists, and those with
physical handicaps will be unable to access
the site along this IH-35 corridor in a safe
manner. Requiring these populations to
utilize the ROW is detrimental to the safety
of motorist as well as the population
seeking safe walk paths.
That the granting of the
variance would not
substantially conflict with the
Does Not Comply
The granting of the variance would conflict
with the purposes of UDC Section 12.07
which states, Sidewalks shall be
Page 51 of 83
Planning Department Staff Report
2019-1-WAV
Pet Paradise – Subdivision Variance Page 5 of 7
SUBDIVISION VARIANCE
CRITERIA
FINDINGS COMMENTS
Comprehensive Plan and the
purposes of this Code.
constructed on both sides of all streets,
including frontage roads (6’ wide); and
Sidewalks shall be constructed consistent
with the Construction Manual and in
conformance with the requirements of the
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
The purpose of these requirements is to
provide alternative, safe routes for
pedestrians and enhance the City’s
sidewalk network.
Additionally, the granting of the variance
would conflict with the Comprehensive
Plan and 2015 Sidewalk Master Plan. The
Sidewalk Master Plan calls for the
construction of sidewalk along S IH-35 for
pedestrian access. Within the Sidewalk
Master Plan, a prioritization tool assigned
a score to each sidewalk segment within
the City of Georgetown based on their
relation to each element. Sidewalk segment
priority rankings ranged from 0 to 73
points. (0 being the highest priority). The
sidewalk segment in question scored in the
10-20 range, the second highest priority
bracket.
That the conditions that create
the need for the variance do not
generally apply to other
property in the vicinity.
Complies
There is an existing pond located on the
property and the area between the pond
and roadway has an average 23% slope.
Construction of a sidewalk along this
roadway will require significant grading
and fill, and installation of a rail along the
pond retention wall. Other property in the
vicinity do not have these same conditions.
That application of a provision
of this Code will render
subdivision of the land
impossible.
Does Not Comply
The subject property is currently vacant
with a C-3 General Commercial zoning.
There are no present constraints to
subdivide and develop the land.
Where the literal enforcement of
these regulations would result Does Not Comply Providing a sidewalk along S IH-35 would
not result in an unnecessary hardship as
Page 52 of 83
Planning Department Staff Report
2019-1-WAV
Pet Paradise – Subdivision Variance Page 6 of 7
SUBDIVISION VARIANCE
CRITERIA
FINDINGS COMMENTS
in an unnecessary hardship. alternative options and routes exist to
provide a sidewalk along this segment of
the roadway between the edge of
pavement and the pond retaining wall.
Summary:
Staff has found that the requested variance to waiver the sidewalk requirements satisfies only one (1)
of the five (5) preceding factors. Overall, the information provided by the applicant are self-inflicted
hardships and there are not any barriers to developing the land in accordance with the UDC.
Staff’s advice for the subject property, as well as adjacent properties with frontage along S IH-35, is not
to provide the required 6’ sidewalk directly along S IH-35, but rather create a sidewalk further back
from S IH-35 out of the TxDOT Right-of-Way near the subject property’s pond wall exacting to create
a ledge or add fill and installing a rail. This would be the ideal situation for resident’s safety and provide
pedestrian connectivity.
Public Notification
As required by the Unified Development Code (UDC), all property owners within 200 feet of the subject
property were notified of the request (6 notices mailed), a legal notice advertising the public hearing
was placed in the Sun Newspaper (February 17, 2019) and signs were posted on-site. As of the
publication date of this report, staff has received 0 written comments in favor and 0 in opposition of the
request.
Motion
When making a motion to approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove the variance request, the
Planning and Zoning Commission must identify and recite each factor that the Commission has found
to have been met, or not met (in the event of a disapproval).
Attachments
WAV-2018-003 – P&Z Staff Report
Page 53 of 83
Planning Department Staff Report
2019-1-WAV
Pet Paradise – Subdivision Variance Page 7 of 7
Exhibit 1 – Location Map
Exhibit 2 – Letter of Intent
Exhibit 3 – Concept Plan
Presentation
Page 54 of 83
N IH 35
R
I
V
E
RY
BL
V
D
N AUSTIN AVE
S IH 35
W U N I V E R S I T Y AV E
S
M
A
I
N
S
T
S
A
U
S
T
I
N
AV
E
W
IL
LIA
M
S D
R
2019-1-WAVExhibit #1
Coordinate S ystem : Texas S tat e Plane /C ent ral Z one/NA D 83/US F eetCartographic Data For G eneral P lanning Purposes Only
¯
Location Map LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
0 0.25 0.5Mi
Page 55 of 83
Page 56 of 83
Page 57 of 83
EXISTING SIDEWALK
EXISTING SIDEWALK
EXISTING SIDEWALK
SIDEWALK TO BE BUILT WITH PET
PARADISE DEVELOPMENT
REQUESTED SIDEWALK VARIANCE
EXISTING POND
RIVERY
DRIVEWAY
RIVERY
DRIVEWAY
RIVERY
BLVD
0 200'400'100'
SCALE: 1"=200'
EXISTING SIDEWALK
PROPOSED SIDEWALK
FUTURE SIDEWALK
REQUESTED SIDEWALK VARIANCE
Aerial Exhibit.dwg
Issued:
Scale:
Drawn By:
AVO:
HALFF Office:
HALFF R
9500 AMBERGLEN BLVD.
BUILDING F, SUITE 125
AUSTIN, TEXAS 78729
TEL (512) 777-4600
FAX (512) 252-8141
TBPE FIRM #F-312
12/20/2018
1:200
JSA
34686.001
AUS
OVERALL AERIAL SIDEWALK NETWORK
PET PARADISE VARIANCE REQUEST
01/11/2019
Page 58 of 83
E
RI
V
E
R
Y
D
R
I
V
E
W
A
Y
IH
-
3
5
F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E
R
O
A
D
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
PET PARADISE
19,395 SF
FFE: 767.00
DA
Y
C
A
M
P
B
L
D
G
722
S
F
FFE
:
7
6
7
.
0
0
OUTDOOR
PLAY AREA
L4
L
3
C
3
C2
L2
C1
L1
L1
0
L9
L8
L7
L6
L5
14
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
V
A
N
(P
R
I
V
A
T
E
D
R
I
V
E
W
A
Y
)
5 PARKING
2
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
EXISTING WET POND
EXISTING CONCRETE RETAINING WALL
CONCRETE RETAINING WALL
LOCATION OF REQUIRED SIDEWALK (APPROXIMATELY 150')
EXISTING CONCRETE DRAINAGE FLUME
PROPOSED 6' SIDEWALK
PROPOSED 6' SIDEWALK
EXISTING 6' SIDEWALK
WELLS FARGO BANK
GEORGE'S ON THE TOWN
IHOP
EXISTING CONCRETE RETAINING WALL
IH
-
3
5
F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E
R
O
A
D
LINE AND CURVE TABLE
LINE/CURVE #
L1
C1
L2
C2
C3
L3
L4
L5
L6
L7
L8
L9
L10
LENGTH (FT)
20.62
36.96
31.19
148.85
67.98
154.24
295.24
150.00
174.10
277.04
237.31
10.05
409.62
BEARING/DELTA
N65° 26' 24.44"W
84.70
N64° 35' 32.66"W
25.49
11.72
N27° 39' 04.77"W
N56° 13' 04.95"W
N33° 00' 54.09"E
S57° 41' 51.91"E
S82° 55' 27.91"E
S70° 41' 00.48"E
S25° 03' 01.52"W
S25° 03' 01.52"W
RADIUS (FT)
25.00
334.56
332.38
IH
-
3
5
UNIVERSITY AVE
0 30'60'15'
SCALE: 1"=30'
SHEET NUMBER:
SHEET TITLE:
CHECKED BY:
DRAWN BY:
PROJECT NO:
ISSUED:
NO
.
DA
T
E
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
SCALE:
34686
MCS
RWS
PE
T
P
A
R
A
D
I
S
E
DE
V
E
L
O
P
E
R
71
6
S
I
H
3
5
G
E
O
R
G
E
T
O
W
N
,
T
E
X
A
S
7
8
6
2
6
12/20/2018
THE INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS INDICATING SIZE, TYPE AND LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND, SURFACE,
AND AERIAL UTILITIES IS NOT GUARANTEED TO BE EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE
GEORGETOWN AREA "ONE CALL" SYSTEM AT 1-800-344-8377 (DIG TESS)48 HOURS PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY EXCAVATION
FOR EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR FIELD VERIFYING
LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES AFFECTED BY CONSTRUCTION FOR THIS PROJECT IN ORDER TO
AVOID DAMAGING THOSE UTILITIES, AND SHALL IMMEDIATELY ARRANGE FOR REPAIR AND RESTORATION OF CONTRACTOR-
DAMAGED UTILITIES TO THE UTILITY COMPANY'S APPROVAL AT THE EXPENSE OF THE CONTRACTOR.
Know what's below.
before you dig.Call
R
95
0
0
A
M
B
E
R
G
L
E
N
B
L
V
D
.
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
F
,
S
U
I
T
E
1
2
5
AU
S
T
I
N
,
T
E
X
A
S
7
8
7
2
9
TE
L
(5
1
2
)
7
7
7
-
4
6
0
0
FA
X
(5
1
2
)
2
5
2
-
8
1
4
1
TB
P
E
F
I
R
M
#
F
-
3
1
2
34
6
8
6
-
E
X
-
S
I
T
E
-
V
A
R
I
A
N
C
E
.
d
w
g
--
-
-
12
/
2
0
/
2
0
1
8
9
:
2
5
A
M
THESE DOCUMENTS ARE RELEASED FOR THE PURPOSE
OF REVIEW UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF ROBERT W.
SCHOLZ, P.E. N.O. 91151 ON 12/17/2018. IT IS NOT TO BE
USED FOR BIDDING, PERMIT, OR CONSTRUCTION.
PRELIMINARY
FOR INTERIM REVIEW ONLY
ROBERT W. SCHOLZ, PE
NAME
91151
P.E. NO.
12/17/2018
TBPE FIRM NO. F-312
DATE
LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT
SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT
EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT
CO
HANDICAP PARKING
STORM GRATE INLET
PROPOSED STORM SEWER CURB INLET
PROPOSED STORM SEWER MANHOLE
EASEMENT LINE
EXISTING WW MANHOLE
EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN
ADA SIGN / STOP SIGN
EXISTING CURB & GUTTER
WATER LINE GATE VALVE
1:30
ACREAGE: 4.428 ACRES
PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE
EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR
EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR
CO
N
C
E
P
T
U
A
L
P
L
A
N
01/11/2019
01/11/2019
Page 59 of 83
01/11/2019
Page 60 of 83
Overall Pond View
Looking Southeasterly
Page 61 of 83
Looking South
Pond Wall
Page 62 of 83
Page 63 of 83
2019-1-WAV
Pet Paradise
Planning & Zoning Commission
March 5, 2019
Page 64 of 83
Items under consideration:
2019-1-WAV –Subdivision Variance
Public Hearing and possible action on a
Subdivision Variance from the Sidewalk
Construction requirement pursuant to
Section 12.07 of the Unified Development
Code,for the property located at 716 S IH
35,bearing the legal description 4.428
acres of Rivery PH 1 Block B,Lot 5E,(2019-
1-WAV).
Page 65 of 83
Wavier Request:
•The applicant is requesting a variance from
the Sidewalk Construction requirement
pursuant to Section 12.02.030, which
requires a sidewalk to be constructed
along S IH-35 between 750 and 708 S
IH-35. The requested variance is to waive
the sidewalk requirement.
Page 66 of 83
Location Map
Page 67 of 83
UDC Section 12.07.010
•All sidewalks and trails identified in this Code,
the City's Sidewalk Master Plan, Overall
Transportation Plan, Parks Recreation and
Open Space Master Plan, Trails Master Plan,
Downtown Master Plan, and any other
relevant plan shall be constructed in
accordance with this Code. Public sidewalks
and trails do not count against the maximum
impervious cover percentage required in
Section 11.02 of this Code.
Page 68 of 83
Subdivision Variance
Page 69 of 83
Sidewalk Master Plan: Note
•According to the Sidewalk Master Plan,
Sidewalks will not be required for sites
with unique and extraordinary conditions.
These sites may qualify for alternative
routes, payments-in-lieu of construction, or
delays in construction.
Page 70 of 83
Per UDC Section 3.22.060, a Subdivision Variance may be approved based on
the following criteria:
Criteria For Subdivision Variance Complies Does not comply Partially
Complies
That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental
to the public health,safety or welfare or injurious to
other property in the area or to the City in administering
this Code.
X
That the granting of the variance would not substantially
conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and the purposes
of this Code.X
That the conditions that create the need for the variance
do not generally apply to other property in the vicinity.X
That application of a provision of this Code will render
subdivision of the land impossible.X
Where the literal enforcement of these regulations would
result in an unnecessary hardship.X
Staff Analysis
Page 71 of 83
Staff Analysis
Page 72 of 83
Staff Analysis
Site
Sidewalk
•The Sidewalk
located along
S. IH-35 is
considered to
be part of the
second highest
tier in the
Sidewalk
Master Plan.
(Prioritization
Results.)
Page 73 of 83
Staff Analysis
Page 74 of 83
Subdivision Variance
Page 75 of 83
Public Notifications
Page 76 of 83
Public Notifications
•6 property owners, who are within 200’ of the subject
property to be rezoned, were notified about the public
hearing;
•Notice of the public hearing was published in the Sun
News on February 17, 2019; and
•Signs were posted on the property in accordance with
the UDC.
•To date, staff has received one (1) letter in favor and
one (0) in opposition of the request.
Page 77 of 83
•Public Hearing and possible action on a Subdivision
Variance from the Sidewalk Construction requirement
pursuant to Section 12.07of the Unified Development
Code,for the property located at 716 S IH 35,bearing
the legal description 4.428 acres of Rivery PH 1 Block B,
Lot 5E,(2019-1-WAV).
•Per UDC Section 2.33.050,a Subdivision Variance may be
approved,conditionally approved,or disapproved by the
Planning &Zoning Commission with a super majority vote.
•The motion should also include findings of how it either
met/did not meet each of the criteria.
Summary
Page 78 of 83
City of Georgetown, Texas
Planning and Zoning
March 5, 2019
S UB J E C T:
Update on the 2018/19 UDC Annual R eview P lan, S c hedule and Next S teps. Andreina Dávila-Q uintero,
AI C P, C urrent P lanning Manager
IT E M S UMMARY:
T he purpos e of this item is to provide an update on the UDC Annual R eview P lan, tentative s chedule and
next s teps for the 2018/19 UDC G eneral Amendments list.
F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
None.
S UB MIT T E D B Y:
Andreina Dávila-Q uintero, AI C P, C urrent P lanning Manager
AT TAC H ME N T S:
Description Type
2018/19 General Amendments Lis t Update Backup Material
Page 79 of 83
Printed on 2/8/2019
UDC Annual Review 2018/19 Schedule ***DRAFT***
General Topic Group Status Am
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
N
o
.
Requested Amendment
UDC Chapter/
Section*Re
s
e
a
r
c
h
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
Dr
a
f
t
L
a
n
g
u
a
g
e
UD
C
A
C
R
e
v
i
e
w
CC
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
Op
e
n
H
o
u
s
e
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
Dr
a
f
t
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
L
a
n
g
u
a
g
e
UD
C
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
B
o
a
r
d
s
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
i
o
n
Fi
n
a
l
i
z
e
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
L
a
n
g
u
a
g
e
Po
s
t
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
o
n
W
e
b
s
i
t
e
f
o
r
P
u
b
l
i
c
Re
v
i
e
w
UD
C
A
C
P
u
b
l
i
c
H
e
a
r
i
n
g
&
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
P&
Z
P
u
b
l
i
c
H
e
a
r
i
n
g
&
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
CC
1
P
u
b
l
i
c
H
e
a
r
i
n
g
&
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
CC
2
F
i
n
a
l
A
c
t
i
o
n
Ef
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
D
a
t
e
Application Processes and
Requirements Complete 8
Expand development agreement language establishing clear
requirements and processes.
Ch. 3, Sec 3.20 & Ch.
13, Sec 13.10 13-Jun 12-Jun July
UDC Aug
Discussion July Aug-Sep 14-Nov-18 4-Dec-18 11-Dec-18 8-Jan-19 Q1 2019
Nonresidential Standards Complete 4
Consider revising the minimum district size for the BP zoning district
(Executive Amendment). Ch. 7, Sec 7.02 N/A N/A N/A N/A 3-Apr-18 10-Apr-18 24-Apr-18 Q2 2018
Land Uses Complete 1
Acknowledge mobile food trailers as a use within the UDC and outline
appropriate regulations governing mobile food vendors. Ch. 3 & Ch. 5 10-Jan-18 8-May-18
UDC July
Discussion Jul-Aug 8-Aug-18 4-Sep-18 25-Sep-18 9-Oct-18 Q4 2018
Historic Districts In Review 2
Review the standards pertaining to historic districts and structures
based on the revised Historic Resource Survey
Ch. 3, Sec 3.13 & Ch.
16, Sec 16.02 Nov-19 13-Feb-19
Nov 18
Dec 18
Jan 19 Jan-19 Feb-19 Feb-19 13-Mar-19 19-Mar-19 26-Mar-19 9-Apr-19 Q1 2019
Parkland In Review 3
Update provisions governing parkland dedication based on
forthcoming recommendations by the Parks & Recreation Board
subcommittee review. Ch. 13, Sec 13.08 Jan-19 13-Feb-19 Feb-19 Jan-19 Mar-19 Mar-19 Mar-19 10-Apr-19 16-Apr-19 23-Apr-19 14-May-19 Q2 2019
Residential Standards In Review 14
Review the maximum number of units required per building, and
building separation requirements for MF districts Ch. 6, Sec 6.02 Jan-19 Feb-19 13-Feb-19 Feb-19 Feb-19 Mar-19 Mar-19 Mar-19 10-Apr-19 16-Apr-19 23-Apr-19 14-May-19 Q2 2019
Application Processes and
Requirements In Review 17
Review the rezoning public review requirements to require
neighborhood meetings for certain rezoning cases. Ch. 3, Sec 3.06 Jan-19 Feb-19 13-Feb-19 Feb-19 Mar-19 Mar-19 Mar-19 Mar-19 10-Apr-19 16-Apr-19 23-Apr-19 14-May-19 Q2 2019
Residential Standards In Review 15 Consider masonry requirements for residential development Ch. 6
Jan/Feb
19 Q2 2019 13-Feb-19 Q2 2019 Q2 2019 Q2 2019 Q2 2019 Q2 2019 Q2 2019 Q3 2019 Q3 2019 Q3 2019 Q3 2019 Q4 2019
Land Uses In Review
11, 12,
13
Review and update Permitted Use tables:
- Consider changes to the zoning districts various Specific Uses may
be permitted in (in general)
- Consider updating the list of Specific Uses in Chapter 5 to include
various uses that are not currently listed (i.e. self service machines (ice)
and storage yards; commercial vehicle sales, micro-distillery).
- Consider changes to the zoning districts various Specific Uses may
be permitted in ("Contractor Services Limited", "Contractor Services
General", and "Office Warehouse" Specific Uses in the C-3 zoning
district); Food Establishment Services in IN with SUP Ch. 5
Jan/Feb
19 Q2 2019 Q2 2019 Q2 2019 Q2 2019 Q2 2019 Q2 2019 Q2 2019 Q2 2019 Q3 2019 Q3 2019 Q3 2019 Q3 2019 Q4 2019
L:\Division\cd\UDC\UDC Amendments\2018‐19\General Amendments\2018 UDC_General_Amendment_List ‐ APPROVED Page 1 of 2Page 80 of 83
Printed on 2/8/2019
UDC Annual Review 2018/19 Schedule ***DRAFT***
General Topic Group Status Am
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
N
o
.
Requested Amendment
UDC Chapter/
Section*Re
s
e
a
r
c
h
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
Dr
a
f
t
L
a
n
g
u
a
g
e
UD
C
A
C
R
e
v
i
e
w
CC
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
Op
e
n
H
o
u
s
e
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
Dr
a
f
t
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
L
a
n
g
u
a
g
e
UD
C
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
B
o
a
r
d
s
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
i
o
n
Fi
n
a
l
i
z
e
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
L
a
n
g
u
a
g
e
Po
s
t
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
o
n
W
e
b
s
i
t
e
f
o
r
P
u
b
l
i
c
Re
v
i
e
w
UD
C
A
C
P
u
b
l
i
c
H
e
a
r
i
n
g
&
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
P&
Z
P
u
b
l
i
c
H
e
a
r
i
n
g
&
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
CC
1
P
u
b
l
i
c
H
e
a
r
i
n
g
&
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
CC
2
F
i
n
a
l
A
c
t
i
o
n
Ef
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
D
a
t
e
Administrative Clean-Up: Federal and
State law compliance In Review
7, 9,
10
Revisions to standards and requirements to ensure compliance with
Federal and State Law: Review Authority; Subdivision Regulations:
When a plat is required; Subdivision Regulations: Replat approval
w/out vacating preceding plat; Subdivision Regulations: Plat
Exemptions; Wastewater connection requirements in ETJ; TUPs
(portable classrooms); Definitions: Household; Definitions: Portable
Signs; Impervious Cover credit for Places of Worship.
Clean-Ups: Permits and Processes; ZBA 45-day review timeline; Model
Homes; Accessory Structures (size limitations); Definitions; Conflicting
and outdated cross-references and sub/section numbers
Ch. 2, Ch. 3, Ch. 5, Ch.
11, Ch. 13 & Ch. 16 Jan-19 Q2 2019 Q2 2019 Q2 2019 Q3 2019 Q3 2019 Q3 2019 Q3 2019 Q3 2019 Q4 2019 Q4 2019 Q4 2019 Q4 2019 Q4 2019
Signage Not Started 18
Review of Ch. 10 including signage for bus stops, transit vehicles and
others (portable signs); sign variance process
Ch. 10 and Ch. 16, Sec
16.02 Q2 2019 Q2 2019 Q2 2019 Q3 2019 Q3 2019 Q3 2019 Q3 2019 Q3 2019 Q4 2019 Q4 2019 Q4 2019 Q4 2019 Q4 2019
Application Processes and
Requirements Not Started
5, 6,
18
New/revise processes:
- Create a process to address requests for vesting determinations.
- Create a process to address requests for appeals.
- Sign variances
Ch. 3, Sec 3.14 and
3.15 Q2 2019 Q2 2019 Q2 2019 Q3 2019 Q3 2019 Q3 2019 Q3 2019 Q3 2019 Q4 2019 Q4 2019 Q4 2019 Q4 2019 Q4 2019
Application Processes and
Requirements On Hold 16
Clarify what triggers the requirement for a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA)
and when an appeal may be made and review the improvements that
are considered or required. Ch. 12, Sec 12.09 TBD
* The UDC Chapter or Section referenced in this column provides the regulation subject to this amendment. However, please note that other sections may need to be amended to address any conflicts and ensure consistency throughout the document.
L:\Division\cd\UDC\UDC Amendments\2018‐19\General Amendments\2018 UDC_General_Amendment_List ‐ APPROVED Page 2 of 2Page 81 of 83
1st and 3rd Tuesday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Friday Monday Wednesday Monday Wednesday Friday 1st & 3rd
Tuesdays 28 days prior 22 days prior 21 days prior 20 days prior 18 days prior 15 days prior 13 days prior 8 days prior 6 days prior 4 days prior Tuesdays
Jan 6 Dec 9, 2014 Dec 15, 2014 Dec 16, 2014 Dec 17, 2014 Dec 19, 2014 Dec 22, 2014 *Dec 23, '14*Dec 23, '14*Dec 23, '14*Dec 23, '14 Dec 29, 2014 Dec 31, 2014 Jan 2, 2015 Jan 6Jan 6Jan 6Jan 6
Jan 20 Dec 23 Dec 29 Dec 30 Dec 31 Jan 2 Jan 5 Jan 7 Jan 12 Jan 14 Jan 16 Jan 20Jan 20Jan 20Jan 20
Feb 3 Jan 6 Jan 12 Jan 13 Jan 14 Jan 16 *Jan 20*Jan 20*Jan 20*Jan 20 Jan 21 Jan 26 Jan 28 Jan 30 Feb 3Feb 3Feb 3Feb 3
Feb 17 Jan 20 Jan 26 Jan 27 Jan 28 Jan 30 Feb 2 Feb 4 Feb 9 Feb 11 Feb 13 Feb 17Feb 17Feb 17Feb 17
Mar 3 Feb 3 Feb 9 Feb 10 Feb 11 Feb 13 Feb 16 Feb 18 Feb 23 Feb 25 Feb 27 Mar 3Mar 3Mar 3Mar 3
Mar 17 Feb 17 Feb 23 Feb 24 Feb 25 Feb 27 Mar 2 Mar 4 Mar 9 Mar 11 Mar 13 Mar 17Mar 17Mar 17Mar 17
Apr 7 Mar 10 Mar 16 Mar 17 Mar 18 Mar 20 Mar 23 Mar 25 Mar 30 Apr 1 Apr 3 Apr 7Apr 7Apr 7Apr 7
Apr 21 Mar 24 Mar 30 Mar 31 Apr 1 Apr 3 Apr 6 Apr 8 Apr 13 Apr 15 Apr 17 Apr 21Apr 21Apr 21Apr 21
May 5 Apr 7 Apr 13 Apr 14 Apr 15 Apr 17 Apr 20 Apr 22 Apr 27 Apr 29 May 1 May 5May 5May 5May 5
May 19 Apr 21 Apr 27 Apr 28 Apr 29 May 1 May 4 May 6 May 11 May 13 May 15 May 19May 19May 19May 19
Jun 2 May 5 Apr 13 May 12 May 13 May 15 May 18 May 20 *May 22*May 22*May 22*May 22 May 27 May 29 Jun 2Jun 2Jun 2Jun 2
Jun 16 May 19 *May 26*May 26*May 26*May 26 May 26 May 27 May 29 Jun 1 Jun 3 Jun 8 Jun 10 Jun 12 Jun 16Jun 16Jun 16Jun 16
Jul 7 Jun 9 Jun 15 Jun 16 Jun 17 Jun 19 Jun 22 Jun 24 Jun 29 Jul 1 Jul 3 Jul 7Jul 7Jul 7Jul 7
Jul 21 Jun 23 Jun 29 Jun 30 Jul 1 *Jul 2*Jul 2*Jul 2*Jul 2 Jul 6 Jul 8 Jul 13 Jul 15 Jul 17 Jul 21Jul 21Jul 21Jul 21
Aug 4 Jul 7 Jul 13 Jul 14 Jul 15 Jul 17 Jul 20 Jul 22 Jul 27 Jul 29 Jul 31 Aug 4Aug 4Aug 4Aug 4
Aug 18 Jul 21 Jul 27 Jul 28 Jul 29 Jul 31 Aug 3 Aug 5 Aug 10 Aug 12 Aug 14 Aug 18Aug 18Aug 18Aug 18
Sep 1 Aug 4 Aug 10 Aug 11 Aug 12 Aug 14 Aug 17 Aug 19 Aug 24 Aug 26 Aug 28 Sep 1Sep 1Sep 1Sep 1
Sep 15 Aug 18 Aug 24 Aug 25 Aug 26 Aug 28 Aug 31 Sep 2 *Sep 4*Sep 4*Sep 4*Sep 4 Sep 9 Sep 11 Sep 15Sep 15Sep 15Sep 15
Oct 6 Sep 8 Sep 14 Sep 15 Sep 16 Sep 18 Sep 21 Sep 23 Sep 28 Sep 30 Oct 2 Oct 6Oct 6Oct 6Oct 6
Oct 20 Sep 22 Sep 28 Sep 29 Sep 30 Oct 2 Oct 5 Oct 7 Oct 12 Oct 14 Oct 16 Oct 20Oct 20Oct 20Oct 20
Nov 3 Oct 6 Oct 12 Oct 13 Oct 14 Oct 16 Oct 19 Oct 21 Oct 26 Oct 28 Oct 30 Nov 3Nov 3Nov 3Nov 3
Nov 17 Oct 20 Oct 26 Oct 27 Oct 28 Oct 30 Nov 2 Nov 4 Nov 9 Nov 11 Nov 13 Nov 17Nov 17Nov 17Nov 17
Dec 1 Nov 3 Nov 9 Nov 10 Nov 11 Nov 13 Nov 16 Nov 18 Nov 23 Nov 25 *Nov 25*Nov 25*Nov 25*Nov 25 Dec 1Dec 1Dec 1Dec 1
Dec 15 Nov 17 Nov 23 Nov 24 Nov 25 *Nov 25*Nov 25*Nov 25*Nov 25 Nov 30 Dec 2 Dec 7 Dec 9 Dec 11 Dec 15Dec 15Dec 15Dec 15
Reports due
to Principal
Planner for
review
Novus
Agenda items
submitted for
review
Novus Items
finalized and
forwarded to
Planning Tech
Novus
completed.
Commission
emailed link.
Posted online
and City Hall.
P&Z Meeting
* Dates adjusted due to holiday - subject to change depending on updates to holiday calendars, etc.
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION 2015
P&Z
MEETING
Public notice
agenda
deadline
Staff finalizes
notice items
on agenda
(Word doc)
Notice items
approved for
notice
Notice Items
sent to Sun
by noon
Letters
mailed and
signs ready
for pick up
after lunch
Non-public
notice agenda
deadline
Page 82 of 83
City of Georgetown, Texas
Planning and Zoning
March 5, 2019
S UB J E C T:
Adjournment
IT E M S UMMARY:
F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
na
S UB MIT T E D B Y:
Page 83 of 83