HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda_P&Z_02.21.2017Notice of Meeting for the
Planning and Zoning Commission
of the City of Georgetown
February 21, 2017 at 6:00 PM
at Council Chambers, 101 East 7th Street, Georgetown, TX 78626
The City o f G eo rgeto wn is committed to comp lianc e with the Americans with Dis abilities Ac t (ADA). If yo u
req uire as s is tanc e in participating at a p ublic meeting d ue to a disability, as d efined und er the ADA, reas onab le
as s is tance, ad ap tatio ns , or acc o mmo d ations will b e provid ed up o n req uest. P leas e c o ntact the City Sec retary's
Office, at leas t three (3) days prior to the sc hed uled meeting d ate, at (512) 930-3652 o r City Hall at 113 Eas t 8th
Street fo r add itional info rmation; TTY us ers ro ute through Relay Texas at 711.
Call to O r de r
P le dge of All egi anc e
Comme nts fr om the Chair
- We lc ome and M ee ting P r oce dur e s
Action fr om Exe cutive Session
As of the de adli ne , no per sons we r e si gne d up to spe ak on i tems other than
those poste d on the agenda.
Consent Agenda
The Statutory Cons ent Agenda inc ludes non-c o ntro versial and ro utine items that may be acted up o n with one
s ingle vo te. An item may b e pulled from the Cons ent Agenda in o rd er that it b e dis c us sed and acted up o n
individ ually as part of the Regular Agenda.
A Co nsideration of the Minutes from the February 7, 2017 P&Z meeting. Karen F ro s t, Recording Sec retary
B Co nsideration and possible actio n o n a Preliminary Final Plat fo r 59.25 ac res o f the Barney Lo w
Survey, loc ated at 1400 Westinghous e Road kno wn as Mansions of Georgetown (P FP -2016-006) Juan
Enriquez, P lanner
Legislativ e Regular Agenda
C Public Hearing and possible actio n o n a req ues t to Rezone Geo rgetown Retirement Res id enc e, Bloc k
A, Lot 2, 2.208 ac res , loc ated at 3700 Williams Drive, fro m the Agric ultural (AG) Dis tric t to the Lo cal
Co mmerc ial (C -1) District. (REZ-2016-038) Matt S ynatsc hk, Histo ric P lanner
D Public Hearing and possible actio n o n a req ues t to Rezone ap p ro ximately 340.5 ac res in the David
Wright Survey Ab s trac t No. 13, the William R o b erts Survey Abstract No. 524, and the Jo hn Berry Survey
Ab s trac t No . 51 loc ated at 6025 Airport Road from Single Family Res idential (RS ), Multi-family 1 (MF -
1), and Planned Unit Development (PUD) Dis tric t to Planned Unit Development (PUD) District . (REZ-
2016-022, Ho mes tead at Berry Creek) Sofia Nels on, Planning Direc tor.
E Pres entatio n and d is cus s io n o f the CAMP O/C ity of Geo rgeto wn Williams Drive S tud y – Jo rd an Maddox,
AICP, Princ ip al P lanner, And reina Dávila-Quintero , Projec t Coordinator, and Nathaniel Waggo ner, AIC P,
PMP, Trans p o rtatio n Analys t
Page 1 of 67
F Dis cus s ion Items :
Update on the Unified Development C o d e Advis o ry Committee (UDC AC ) meetings .
(Commis s ioner Bargainer)
Update on the Geo rgeto wn Transp o rtatio n Ad visory Board (GTAB) meetings .
Ques tio ns o r c o mments from Commis s io ners-in-Training about the ac tio ns and matters c o nsidered
on this agenda.
Remind er of the next P lanning and Zoning Co mmis s io n meeting on Marc h 7,2017 at Co uncil
Chamb ers loc ated at 101 East 7th Street, s tarting at 6:00 p m.
Adjournment
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
I, Shelley No wling, C ity S ecretary fo r the C ity of Geo rgeto wn, Texas , d o hereby c ertify that this Notice of
Meeting was p o s ted at City Hall, 113 E. 8th Street, a p lace read ily acc es s ible to the general p ublic at all times ,
on the ______ d ay o f __________________, 2017, at __________, and remained so p o s ted fo r at leas t 72
c o ntinuo us ho urs p receding the sc heduled time o f s aid meeting.
____________________________________
S helley No wling, City Sec retary
Page 2 of 67
City of Georgetown, Texas
Planning and Zoning
February 21, 2017
SUBJECT:
Cons id eration o f the Minutes fro m the February 7, 2017 P &Z meeting. Karen Fros t, Rec o rd ing Secretary
ITEM SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
NA
SUBMITTED BY:
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Draft Minutes - 2.7.2017 Cover Memo
Page 3 of 67
P&Z Minutes Page 1 of 2
February 7, 2017
City of Georgetown, Texas
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes
Tuesday, February 7, 2017 at 6:00 p.m.
Council and Courts Building
101 East 7th Street, Georgetown, Texas 78626
Commissioners present: Josh Schroeder, Chair; Kevin Pitts, Vice-Chair; Aaron Albright, John Marler,
Tim Bargainer, Alex Fuller and Andy Webb
Commissioner(s) Absent: Tim Bargainer
Commissioners in Training: Gary Leissner
Staff Present: Sofia Nelson, Planning Director; Carolyn Horner, Planner; Matt Synatschk, Planner; and
Karen Frost, Recording Secretary.
A. Chair Schroeder called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. and Albright lead the Pledge of Allegiance.
Chair Schroeder stated the order of the meeting and that those who speak must turn in a speaker form
to the recording secretary before the item that they wish to address begins. Each speaker is permitted
to address the Commission once for each item, for a maximum of three (3) minutes, unless otherwise
agreed to before the meeting begins.
• As of the deadline for this agenda, no persons were signed up to speak on items other than what was
posted on the agenda.
Consent Agenda
The Statutory Consent Agenda includes non-controversial and routine items that may be acted upon
with one single vote. An item may be pulled from the Consent Agenda in order that it be discussed and
acted upon individually as part of the Regular Agenda.
A. Consideration of the Minutes from the January 17, 2017 P&Z meeting. Stephanie McNickle,
Recording Secretary
Motion by Commissioner Fuller to approve the consent agenda including the minutes from the
January 17, 2017 Planning and Zoning meeting. Second by Commissioner Webb. Approved 6 – 0
– 1 (Bargainer absent).
Legislative Regular Agenda
B. Public Hearing and possible action on a request to Rezone Crestview Addition Unit 1, Block 2, Lot
2, located at 1604 Williams Drive, from the Office (OF) District to the Local Commercial (C-1)
District. (REZ-2016-034) Carolyn Horner, AICP, Planner
Horner presented the application. David Platt with Steger Bizzell spoke, representing the
applicant. In response to the Commissioners’ inquiry he explained the applicant was requesting C1
zoning instead of OF zoning because the limitations associated with C-1 were more compatible
with the proposed development. The applicant plans to build a business park type development
across the lot lines, including the property east of this property, on the corner of Rivery Blvd.
Chair Schroeder opened the Public Hearing and with no speakers coming forth, closed it.
Page 4 of 67
P&Z Minutes Page 2 of 2
February 7, 2017
Motion by Pitts to recommend to City Council approval of the rezoning as submitted. Second
by Fuller. Approved 6 – 0 – 1 (Bargainer absent).
C. Public Hearing and possible action on a request to Rezone Crestview Addition Unit 1, Block 2, Lot
3, located at 1606 Williams Drive., from the Single-family Residential (RS) District to the Local
Commercial (C-1) District. (REZ-2016-035) Carolyn Horner, AICP, Planner
Horner presented the application. This property is next to the property in the previous item. The
situation is the same. There were no questions.
Chair Schroeder opened the Public Hearing and with no speakers coming forth, closed it.
Motion by Pitts to recommend to City Council approval of the rezoning as submitted. Second
by Fuller. Approved 6 – 0 – 1 (Bargainer absent).
D. Discussion items:
• Update on the Unified Development Code Advisory Committee (UDCAC) meetings.
(Commissioner Bargainer)
• Update on the Georgetown Transportation Advisory Board (GTAB) meetings.
• Questions or comments from Commissioner-in-Training about the actions and matters
considered on this agenda.
• Reminder of the next Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on February 21, 2017 at
Council Chambers located at 101 East 7th Street, starting at 6:00 p.m.
Sofia Nelson reported that Jordan Maddox was leaving the city organization after ten years. He has
worked on a lot of projects and she asked the commission to wish him well and thank him before
his last day of March 1. This position will be posted soon. She introduced Karen Frost as the new
staff liaison for the commission. Frost will now be the department liaison for all the boards and
commissions of the Planning department. There were no other updates.
Motion to Adjourn by Fuller, second by Pitts at 6:13 p.m.
____________________________________ ____________________________________
Josh Schroeder, Chair P&Z Commissioner
Page 5 of 67
City of Georgetown, Texas
Planning and Zoning
February 21, 2017
SUBJECT:
Cons id eration and p o s s ib le ac tion on a Preliminary Final Plat for 59.25 ac res of the Barney Low
Survey, loc ated at 1400 Wes tingho use Road known as Mans io ns o f Georgeto wn (PF P-2016-006) Juan
Enriq uez, Planner
ITEM SUMMARY:
Background:
This p reliminary final p lat creates 3 lots (two c o mmercial and o ne res id ential). Ac ces s to the site is o ff of
Wes tingho use R o ad . Parkland d ed icatio n requirements are b eing met by a fee-in-lieu. Right-of-way is being
d ed icated along Wes tinghous e Ro ad .
Public Comments:
Pub lic notice is not required for a Preliminary Final P lat ap p licatio n. There have been no inq uiries ab o ut the
p lat.
Recommended motion:
Approve the Preliminary Final P lat fo r Mans ions of Geo rgeto wn Subdivis ion
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None studied at this time.
SUBMITTED BY:
Juan Enriq uez, Planner and Sofia Nelson, CNU-A, P lanning Directo r
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Staff Report Cover Memo
Attachment 1 - Location Map Backup Material
Attachment 2 - Preliminary Final Plat Backup Material
Page 6 of 67
Georgetown Planning Department Staff Report
Mansions of Georgetown Subdivision – Preliminary Final Plat Page 1 of 2
Report Date: February 15, 2017
File No: PFP-2016-006
Project Planner: Juan Enriquez, Planner
Item Details
Project Name: Mansions of Georgetown
Project Address: 1400 Westinghouse Road
Total Acreage: 59.25 ac
Legal Description: Barney Low Survey 59.25 ac
Applicant: Roger Gunderman, P.E.
Property Owner: Stagliano Family Trust & K&H
Investments
Contact: Roger Gunderman, P.E.
Plat Summary
Proposed Lots: Three (3) lots; two (2) commercial and one (1) high density residential
Proposed Streets: None
Heritage Trees: None
Site Information
Location:
The property is located within Georgetown’s City limits on the south side of Westinghouse Road
between Rabbit Hill Road and FM 1460.
Physical Characteristics:
The property is flat, vacant/undeveloped and slopes downward south of Westingouse Road. The
property has approximately 1,800 feet of street frontage along Westinghouse Road.
Background
The subject property was annexed into the City in 2011 by Ordinance No. 2011-55 and given the
default Agriculture District. The property was rezoned to C-1 (Local Commercial) and MF-2
(High Density Multifamily) in 2012 by Ordinance No. 2012-14. The 2030 Comprehensive Plan
future land use category for the property is High Density Residential and Mixed Use
Neighborhood Center. This plat would normally be reviewed administratively as a minor plat.
However, the applicant is required to provide right-of-way along Westinghouse Road and
therefore requires P&Z approval. Thus, this application is presented to the P&Z for approval.
Page 7 of 67
Planning Department Staff Report
Mansions of Georgetown Subdivision – Preliminary Final Plat Page 2 of 2
Utilities
Water and wastewater will be provided by the City of Georgetown. Electric service will be
provided by ONCOR. It is anticipated that there is adequate water capacity at this time to serve
this property either by existing capacity or developer participation in upgrades to infrastructure.
Transportation
The site has public street access from Westinghouse Road. Trip generation will not be reviewed
with the subdivision application since a three lot subdivision will not trigger the need for a
Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA).
Parkland Dedication
Parkland dedication requirements are being met by a fee in lieu.
Staff Analysis
The proposed Preliminary Final Plat meets all of the requirements of the UDC and is presented
for approval.
Attachments
Attachment 1 – Location Map
Attachment 2 – Preliminary Final Plat
Page 8 of 67
§¨¦35
§¨¦35
Westingho
u
s
e
R
d
")1460
R
o
c
k
r
i
d
e
L
n
Tera vi s t a X i n g
Teravista C l u b D r
Westinghou
s
e
R
d
University
B
l
v
d
R
a
b
b
it
H
I
l
l
R
d
PFP-2016-006
Attachment #1
Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only
¯
Location Map
0 0.5 1Mi
LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
Page 9 of 67
TR
A
C
T
3
CA
L
L
E
D
1
6
.
3
8
8
A
C
R
E
S
WA
R
R
A
N
T
Y
D
E
E
D
(D
O
C
.
#
2
0
0
6
0
7
2
5
7
4
)
N2
1
°
3
0
'
1
9
"
W
1
3
0
.
4
9
'
LOT 3
N68°41'26"E 412.36'
88
.
2
1
'
36
3
.
2
8
'
142.51'
11.51'
(VAR. WD. R.O.W.)
WESTINGHOUSE ROAD (CR 111)
11.5' R.O.W. DEDICATION (0.47 ACRES)
N1
9
°
3
2
'
1
6
"
W
1
5
7
.
1
1
'
N72°32'03"E 146.12'
N68°41'26"E 1310.44'
N1
8
°
5
5
'
5
8
"
W
4
5
1
.
4
9
'
N1
8
°
4
2
'
4
5
"
W
67
2
.
3
0
'
N70°17'20"E 765.42'
N
3
1
°
5
4
'
1
9
"
W
1
7
2
.
5
6
'
11
2
'
±
58
.
5
0
'
70
'
(9.39 ACRES)
Lc
OW
N
E
R
:
N
N
P
-
T
E
R
A
V
I
S
T
A
,
L
P
Lc
N2
1
°
2
1
'
1
2
"
W
1
8
3
.
5
0
'
S2
1
°
2
1
'
1
2
"
E
1
8
3
.
5
0
'
69.00'
S68°41'26"W
45.64'23.36'
INGRESS/EGRESS
EASEMENT
BENCHMARK B
BLOCK 1
VARIABLE WIDTH
DRAINAGE ESM'T.
(10.70 AC.)
VARIABLE WIDTH
DRAINAGE ESM'T.
(10.70 AC.)
N= 10186199.66
E= 3134722.54
N= 10186354.88
E= 3135178.11
10' PUE
VA
R
.
W
D
.
P
R
I
V
A
T
E
U
T
I
L
I
T
Y
ES
M
'
T
.
(
0
.
4
0
0
A
C
.
)
126
.
9
3
'
55.99'
42.83'
85.58'
S25°10'32"W
77.61'
S1
8
°
5
5
'
5
8
"
E
4
1
1
.
9
9
'
S54°44'55"E
47.09'
57.56'
L1 L2
L
3
L4
L
5
L
6
L7
L
8
L9
L10
L
1
1
L1
2
L
1
3
L
1
4
L
6
8
L6
9
L7
0
L7
1
L
7
2
L
7
3
L
6
7
276
.
1
9
'
4
3
8
.
8
6
'
N
5
1
°
5
0
'
0
8
"
W
N19
°
3
4
'
4
4
"
E
(408,930.04 SQFT.)
COMMERCIAL
LOT 2
(40.51 ACRES)
BLOCK 1
(1,764,643.86 SQFT.)
MULTIFAMILY
30
'
I
N
G
R
E
S
S
/
E
G
R
E
S
S
ES
M
'
T
.
(
0
.
4
9
0
A
C
.
)
30' INGRESS/EGRESS
ESM'T. (0.490 AC.)
N1
8
°
5
5
'
5
8
"
W
4
3
6
.
4
0
'
S1
8
°
5
5
'
5
8
"
E
4
3
5
.
6
3
'
N70°17'20"E 158.11'
S70°17'20"W 153.73'
37.81'190.59'
C1
C2
C
3
C
4
C5C6
C7
14
5
.
6
0
'
WESTING HOUSE (CR11)
Curve Table
Curve #
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
C6
C7
Length
335.29'
339.88'
36.44'
69.14'
10.22'
31.09'
83.97'
Radius
5055.06'
5066.56'
23.00'
53.00'
23.00'
23.00'
53.00'
Delta
3°48'01"
3°50'37"
90°46'42"
74°44'33"
25°26'53"
77°26'39"
90°46'42"
Tangent
167.71'
170.00'
23.31'
40.48'
5.19'
18.44'
53.72'
Chord Bearing
N 70°35'52" E
N 70°36'44" E
S 64°19'19" E
S 72°20'23" E
S 47°41'33" E
N 70°59'20" W
N 64°19'19" W
Chord Length
335.23'
339.82'
32.75'
64.34'
10.13'
28.77'
75.46'
Line Table
Line #
L1
L2
L3
L4
L5
L6
L7
L8
L9
L10
L11
L12
L13
L14
L15
L16
L17
L18
L19
L20
L21
L22
L23
L24
L25
L26
L27
L28
L29
L30
L31
L32
L33
L34
L37
L38
L39
Bearing
N 68°41'26" E
S 76°48'28" E
S 44°46'20" E
S 19°10'14" E
S 64°52'55" E
S 70°25'16" E
S 14°09'29" W
S 48°59'06" E
S 42°37'06" W
S 14°09'29" W
S 51°36'13" E
S 02°11'12" W
S 46°38'44" E
S 60°36'31" E
S 24°56'10" E
S 65°03'50" W
S 24°56'10" E
S 68°40'01" E
N 67°36'08" E
S 24°56'10" E
S 68°52'02" E
N 67°12'07" E
S 07°18'41" E
S 52°18'41" E
N 82°41'19" E
S 10°48'33" E
S 54°16'46" E
N 78°49'41" E
S 77°58'03" E
N 63°53'46" E
N 01°48'30" W
N 06°38'17" E
N 01°38'30" W
N 21°01'33" W
S 68°41'18" W
N 12°58'28" W
N 77°01'32" E
Length
76.95'
59.02'
58.81'
38.72'
161.84'
20.84'
33.89'
22.76'
42.61'
53.58'
155.17'
28.19'
55.00'
144.06'
107.99'
10.79'
103.58'
38.75'
22.02'
95.66'
38.85'
57.12'
43.42'
39.60'
21.83'
139.81'
39.90'
135.14'
128.62'
284.35'
98.57'
81.30'
166.70'
542.94'
60.93'
43.41'
55.66'
Line Table
Line #
L41
L42
L43
L44
L45
L46
L47
L48
L49
L50
L51
L52
L53
L54
L55
L56
L57
L58
L59
L60
L61
L62
L63
L64
L65
L66
L67
L68
L69
L70
L71
L72
L73
Bearing
N 77°01'32" E
S 21°01'33" E
N 68°57'56" E
N 18°42'45" W
N 71°17'15" E
S 82°31'27" E
N 58°11'13" E
N 76°56'34" E
S 85°28'14" E
N 71°27'49" E
N 61°08'04" E
S 89°58'20" E
S 85°03'39" E
N 84°17'58" E
N 73°39'34" E
N 11°10'19" W
N 50°58'32" W
S 84°38'11" W
N 11°10'19" W
S 78°49'41" W
N 21°49'33" E
N 24°03'27" W
N 69°56'26" W
N 24°56'10" W
S 65°03'50" W
N 61°56'37" W
N 31°09'26" W
N 25°26'33" W
N 82°15'48" W
N 18°49'37" W
N 01°00'59" W
N 45°57'17" W
N 65°35'48" W
Length
24.84'
538.62'
23.99'
121.54'
111.10'
74.65'
59.38'
58.23'
78.75'
48.58'
166.72'
190.61'
99.41'
37.30'
116.63'
98.89'
35.75'
98.36'
174.33'
89.75'
60.70'
25.85'
29.07'
77.47'
36.31'
57.88'
137.71'
222.38'
84.74'
74.20'
106.66'
128.83'
100.05'
Date: Jan 17, 2017, 1:29pm User ID: dgonzales
File: P:\Williamson\31423-Mansions at Teravista at Westinghouse Rd\Design\Plats\sh-plat-31423.dwg
NOTE:
PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION, CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY
BOTH BENCHMARKS DEPICTED ON THIS DRAWING AND REPORT ANY
DISCREPANCIES WITH ELEVATION OR DESCRIPTION TO THE
CIVIL ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY.
GENERAL NOTES:
1. UTILITY PROVIDERS FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT ARE WATER: CITY OF GEORGETOWN, WASTEWATER: CITY OF GEORGETOWN, AND ELECTRIC:
BY ONCOR.
2. ALL STRUCTURES / OBSTRUCTIONS ARE PROHIBITED IN DRAINAGE EASEMENTS.
3. THERE ARE NO AREAS WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THIS SUBDIVISION IN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN AS DEFINED BY FIRM MAP NUMBER
48491C0485E, EFFECTIVE DATE OF SEPTEMBER 26, 2008.
4. NO DEVELOPMENT SHALL BEGIN PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A FLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR EACH OF THE FOLLOWING LOTS:
N/A
5. PRIOR TO ANY A CHANNEL ALTERATION OR BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION, WHICH WILL CHANGE EXISTING FLOOD PATTERNS OR ELEVATIONS, A
LETTER OF MAP AMENDMENT MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN FLOODPLAIN ADMINISTRATOR FOR APPROVAL AND
APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY.
6. IN ORDER TO PROMOTE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM A STRUCTURE, THE SLAB ELEVATION SHOULD BE BUILT AT LEAST ONE-FOOT ABOVE THE
SURROUNDING GROUND, AND THE GROUND SHOULD BE GRADED AWAY FROM THE STRUCTURE AT A SLOPE 1/2" PER FOOT FOR A DISTANCE
OF AT LEAST 10 FEET.
7. A 10-FOOT PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT IS RESERVED ALONG ALL STREET FRONTAGES WITHIN THIS PLAT.
8. THE MONUMENTS OF THIS PLAT HAVE BEEN ROTATED TO THE NAD 83/93 HARN -TEXAS CENTRAL ZONE AND NAVD 88.
9. IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE PLAT NOTES:-THE MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE PER NON-RESIDENTIAL LOT IS DETERMINED AT THE TIME OF
SITE PLAN.
10. THERE ARE NO AREAS WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THIS SUBDIVISION IN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN AS DEFINED BY FIRM MAP NUMBER
4891C 0485 E , EFFECTIVE DATE OF SEPTEMBER 26, 2008 .
11. IN ORDER TO PROMOTE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM A STRUCTURE, THE SLAB ELEVATION SHOULD BE BUILT AT LEAST ONE-FOOT ABOVE THE
SURROUNDING GROUND, AND THE GROUND SHOULD BE GRADED AWAY FROM THE STRUCTURE AT A SLOPE OF 1
2" PER FOOT FOR A DISTANCE
OF AT LEAST 10 FEET.
12. PARKLAND DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS WILL BE MET BY PAYING THE FEE IN LIEU OF DEDICATION.
13. ANY HERITAGE TREE AS NOTED ON THIS PLAT IS SUBJECT, IN PERPETUITY, TO THE MAINTENANCE, CARE, PRUNING AND REMOVAL
REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN. APPROVED REMOVAL DOES NOT REQUIRE MODIFICATION OF THE PLAT.
14. RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENTS FOR WIDENING ROADWAYS OR IMPROVING DRAINAGE SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE LANDOWNER UNTIL
ROAD OR DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ARE ACTUALLY CONSTRUCTED ON THE PROPERTY. THE CITY AND/OR COUNTY HAVE THE RIGHT AT ANY
TIME TO TAKE POSSESSION OF ANY ROAD WIDENING EASEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION, IMPROVEMENT, OR MAINTENANCE OF THE ADJACENT
ROAD.
15. THIS PLAT IS SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN WATER CONSERVATION ORDINANCE.
16. "GRANTORS HEREBY AGREE TO LIMIT THE HEIGHT OF ANY STRUCTURE ON THE PROPERTY AS REQUIRED BY UDC OF THE CITY OF
GEORGETOWN CODE OF ORDINANCE."
17. "GRANTORS HEREBY AGREE THAT THE USE OF THE PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO THE USE RESTRICTIONS SET FORTH IN UDC OF THE CITY
OF GEORGETOWN CODE OF ORDINANCES."
18. "THESE EASEMENTS SHALL BE PERPETUAL AND SHALL BE BINDING ON GRANTOR AND ITS ASSIGNS, HEIRS AND SUCCESSORS.
19. A RESTRICTIVE COVENANT (DOC. # 2012018169) THAT ESTABLISHED A BUFFER AREA BETWEEN THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND THE
EXISTING TERRAVISTA COMMUNITY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY.
20. A TIA IS TO BE COMPLETED FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT ONCE AVERAGE DAILY TRIPS IS 2000, ALL DEVELOPMENT WITH THIS PLAT SHALL BE
CONSIDERED PROPOSED AND NOT TREATED AS BACKGROUND. UPON SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENT THE TIA SHALL BE UPDATED.
21. THE LANDOWNER ASSUMES ALL RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, OR ROAD WIDENING
EASEMENTS. BY PLACING ANYTHING IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OR ROAD WIDENING EASEMENTS. THE LANDOWNER INDEMNIFIES AND HOLDS THE
CITY OF GEORGETOWN, WILLIAMSON COUNTY, THEIR OFFICERS, AGENTS AND EMPLOYEES HARMLESS FROM ANY LIABILITY OWING TO
PROPERTY DEFECTS OR NEGLIGENCE NOT ATTRIBUTABLE TO THEM AND ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS MAY BE REMOVED BY
THE CITY AND/OR COUNTY AND THAT THE OWNER OF THE IMPROVEMENTS WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE RELOCATION AND/OR
REPLACEMENT OF THE IMPROVEMENTS.
22. THE BUILDING OF ALL STREETS, ROADS, AND OTHER PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES AND ANY BRIDGES OR CULVERTS NECESSARY TO BE
CONSTRUCTED OR PLACED IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNERS OF THE TRACT OF LAND COVERED BY THIS PLAT IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS PRESCRIBED BY THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN AND/OR WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS. NEITHER THE CITY OF
GEORGETOWN NOR WILLIAMSON COUNTY ASSUMES ANY OBLIGATION TO BUILD ANY OF THE STREETS, ROADS, OR OTHER PUBLIC
THOROUGHFARES SHOWN ON THIS PLAT OR OF CONSTRUCTING ANY OF THE BRIDGES OR DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS IN CONNECTION
THEREWITH. NEITHER THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN NOR WILLIAMSON COUNTY ASSUMES ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR DRAINAGE WAYS OR
EASEMENTS IN THE SUBDIVISION, OTHER THAN THOSE DRAINING OR PROTECTING THE ROAD SYSTEM AND STREETS IN THEIR RESPECTIVE
JURISDICTIONS.
23. NEITHER THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN NOR WILLIAMSON COUNTY ASSUMES ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OF
REPRESENTATIONS BY OTHER PARTIES IN THIS PLAT. FLOODPLAIN DATA, IN PARTICULAR, MAY CHANGE DEPENDING ON SUBSEQUENT
DEVELOPMENT. IT IS FURTHER UNDERSTOOD THAT THE OWNERS OF THE TRACT OF LAND COVERED BY THIS PLAT MUST INSTALL AT THEIR
OWN EXPENSE ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AND SIGNAGE THAT MAY BE REQUIRED BEFORE THE STREETS IN THE SUBDIVISION HAVE
FINALLY BEEN ACCEPTED FOR MAINTENANCE BY THE CITY AND/OR OR COUNTY.
24. ALL WATER QUALITY, SEDIMENTATION, FILTRATION, WATER QUALITY, DETENTION, AND/OR RETENTION BASINS, FEATURES, AND RELATED
APPURTENANCES SHALL BE SITUATED WITHIN A DRAINAGE EASEMENT OR DRAINAGE LOT. THE OWNERS, HOA OR ITS ASSIGNEES OF THE
TRACTS UPON WHICH ARE LOCATED SUCH EASEMENTS. APPURTENANCES, AND DETENTION FACILITIES SHALL MAINTAIN AND BE
RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR MAINTENANCE, ROUTINE INSPECTION AND UPKEEP. ACCESS TO WESTINGHOUSE ROAD SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO
THE INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT SHOWN ON THE PLAT.
BENCHMARK A
BENCHMARK B
ELEVATION = 894.02
FIELDNOTE DESCRIPTION:
MATCH LINE SEE SHEET 2 OF 3
SET MAG NAIL AT CENTERLINE OF CURB INLET. ON
SOUTHSIDE OF WESTINGHOUSE ROAD ±70' WEST OF
THE NORTHEAST PROPERTY CORNER OF THE 59.21 AC.
SET MAGE NAIL AT CENTERLINE OF CURB INLET ON
SOUTHSIDE OF WESTINGHOUSE ROAD ±30' WEST OF
THE NORTHWEST PROPERTY CORNER 59.21 AC.
NOTE:
PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION, CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY
BOTH BENCHMARKS DEPICTED ON THIS DRAWING AND REPORT ANY
DISCREPANCIES WITH ELEVATION OR DESCRIPTION TO THE
CIVIL ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY.
ELEVATION = 906.85
A 59.25 ACRE (2,581,108 SQUARE FEET) TRACT OF LAND IN THE BARNEY LOW SURVEY ABSTRACT NO. 385, BEING ALL OF THE CALLED 59.21 ACRE TRACT DESCRIBED IN SPECIAL WARRANTY
DEED RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NUMBER 2015101552, OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS, WILLIAMSON COUNTY TEXAS; SAID 59.25 ACRES BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES
AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A 1/2-INCH IRON ROD IN THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF WESTINGHOUSE ROAD (C.R. 111), A VARIABLE WIDTH PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, AND BEING THE MOST
WESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 6, BLOCK 9, TERAVISTA SECTION 311 AND 312, ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NUMBER 2013054842, PLAT RECORDS, WILLIAMSON COUNTY,
TEXAS;
THENCE THE FOLLOWING CALLS ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID TERAVISTA SECTION 311 AND 312;
S 20°35'48” E, A DISTANCE OF 692.52 FEET, TO A 1/2-INCH IRON ROD WITH CAP STAMPED “BURY” FOUND;
S 21°02'04” E, A DISTANCE OF 488.87 FEET, TO A 1/2-INCH IRON ROD WITH CAP STAMPED “BURY” FOUND;
S 21°08'32” E A DISTANCE OF 399.46 FEET, TO A 1/2-INCH IRON ROD WITH CAP STAMPED “BURY” FOUND AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID TERAVISTA SECTION 311 AND 312, ALSO
BEING IN THE NORTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF LOT 25, BLOCK 1, TERAVISTA SECTION 20, ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NUMBER 2012061566, PLAT RECORDS,
WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS;
THENCE S 78°02'29” W A DISTANCE OF 209.54 FEET, TO A TO A 1/2-INCH IRON ROD WITH CAP STAMPED “BURY” FOUND AT THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 28, BLOCK 1 ALSO
BEING THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 31, BLOCK 1, TERAVISTA SECTION 14B, ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED IN CABINET FF, SLIDES 356-358, PLAT RECORDS, WILLIAMSON
COUNTY, TEXAS;
THENCE S 77°55'46” W A DISTANCE OF 128.67 FEET, TO A 1/2-INCH IRON ROD FOUND;
THENCE S 78°49'41” W A DISTANCE OF 1019.45 FEET TO A 1/2-INCH IRON ROD WITH CAP STAMPED “ATS” FOUND IN THE NORTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF LOT 42, BLOCK 1, TERAVISTA
SECTION 13B, ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED IN CABINET DD, SLIDES 384-387, PLAT RECORDS, WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS;
THENCE S 78°44'18” W A DISTANCE OF 503.62 FEET TO A 1/2-INCH IRON ROD WITH CAP STAMPED “BURY” FOUND IN THE NORTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF LOT 42, BLOCK 1 OF SAID
TERAVISTA SECTION 13B, ALSO BEING THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF TRACT 3: A CALLED 16.388 ACRE TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN WARRANTY DEED RECORDED IN DOCUMENT
NUMBER 2006072574, OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS, WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS;
THENCE THE FOLLOWING CALLS ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID 16.388 ACRE TRACT;
N 18°42'45” W A DISTANCE OF 672.30 FEET TO A 1/2-INCH IRON ROD FOUND;
N 18°55'58” W A DISTANCE OF 451.49 FEET TO A 1/2-INCH IRON ROD FOUND;
N 19°32'16” W A DISTANCE OF 157.11 FEET TO A 1/2-INCH IRON ROD FOUND IN THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID WESTINGHOUSE ROAD;
THENCE THE FOLLOWING CALLS ALONG THE ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID WESTINGHOUSE ROAD;
N 72°32'03” E A DISTANCE OF 146.12 TO A 1/2-INCH IRON ROD FOUND AT A POINT OF CURVE TO THE LEFT;
ALONG WITH SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING THE FOLLOWING PARAMETERS: RADIUS=5055.06 FEET, ARC LENGTH=335.29 FEET, CHORD BEARING = N 70°35'52” E AND A CHORD DISTANCE
OF 335.23 FEET TO A 1/2-INCH IRON ROD FOUND;
N 68°41'26” E A DISTANCE OF 1310.44 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING 59.25 ACRES (2,581,108 SQUARE FEET) OF LAND, MORE OR LESS AS SURVEYED BY MACINA,
BOSE, COPELAND, AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
3
O
F
3
INDEX MAP
SHEET 3SHEET 1
SHEET 2
LOT 1LOT 3
LOT 2
GENERAL INFORMATION:
TOTAL ACREAGE . . . . . . . . . . . 59.25 AC.
R.O.W. DEDICATION . . . . . . . . . 0.47 AC.
TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS . . . . 3
COMMERCIAL LOTS . . . . . . . . . 2
MULTI-FAMILY LOT . . . . . . . . . . 1
TOTAL NUMBER OF BLOCKS . . 1
OWNER/DEVELOPER: WESTERN RIM INVESTORS 2016-5, L.P.
2505 NORTH STATE HIGHWAY 360 SUITE 800
GRAND PRAIRE, TX. 75050
PH. (972) 471-8700
ENGINEER/SURVEYOR: MBC ENGINEERS
1035 CENTRAL PARKWAY N.
SAN ANTONIO, TX. 78232
PH. (210) 545-1122
ELEC.
TEL.
CATV
SAN. SWR.
ESM'T.
R.O.W.
VOL.
PG.
VAR. WD.
O.P.R.
PR
PUE
----- ELECTRIC
----- TELEPHONE
----- CABLE TELEVISION
----- SANITARY SEWER
----- EASEMENT
----- RIGHT-OF-WAY
----- VOLUME
----- PAGE
----- VARIABLE WIDTH
----- OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSONS COUNTY TEXAS
----- PLAT RECORDS OF WILLIAMSONS COUNTY TEXAS
----- PUBLIC UTILITY ESM'T.
----- CITY LIMITS LINE / ETJ
----- 14' ELECTRIC AND GAS EASEMENT
----- 1/2" IRON ROD FOUND (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
----- 1/2" IRON ROD WITH CAP STAMPED "MBC ENGINEERS" SET
----- HERITAGE TREE
LEGEND:
A
DATE: 08/05/2016 JOB NO.: 31423/WILL
OF
MANSIONS OF GEORGETOWN
NO
R
T
H
CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS
MACINA BOSE COPELAND & ASSOC., INC.
(210) 545-1122 Fax (210) 545-9302 www.mbcengineers.com
1035 Central Parkway North, San Antonio, Texas 78232
E N G I N E E R S
FIRM REGISTRATION NUMBER: T.B.P.E. F-784 & T.B.P.L.S. 10011700
BEING 59.25 ACE TRACT OF LAND, BEING ALL OF THE CALLED 59.21 ACRE
TRACT DESCRIBED IN SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED RECORDED IN DOCUMENT
NUMBER 2015101552, OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS, WILLIAMSON COUNTY,
TEXAS.
FINAL PLAT
LOCATION MAP
SCALE: 1" = 3000'
NO
R
T
H
I.
H
.
3
5
CITY L
I
M
I
T
WESTI
N
G
H
O
U
S
E
R
O
A
D
COMM
E
R
C
E
CLEAR
V
I
E
W
R
A
B
B
I
T
H
I
L
L
R
O
A
D
CITY LIMIT
CITY LIMIT
Coordinates: N= 10186813.78
E= 3136330.20
Coordinates: N= 10186196.44
E= 3134686.63
PROJECT No. PFP - 2016 - 006 .
ETJ
ETJ
SEE DETAIL "B"
SHEET 2 OF 3.
Attachment 2 - Preliminary Final Plat
Page 10 of 67
TR
A
C
T
3
CA
L
L
E
D
1
6
.
3
8
8
A
C
R
E
S
WA
R
R
A
N
T
Y
D
E
E
D
(D
O
C
.
#
2
0
0
6
0
7
2
5
7
4
)
TE
R
A
V
I
S
T
A
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
3
1
1
A
N
D
3
1
2
(D
O
C
.
#
2
0
1
3
0
5
4
8
4
2
)
150' BUF
F
E
R
A
R
E
A
(
D
O
C
.
#
2
0
1
2
0
1
8
1
6
9
O
P
R
)
SEE GE
N
E
R
A
L
N
O
T
E
N
O
.
1
9
.
50
'
B
U
F
F
E
R
A
R
E
A
(
D
O
C
.
#
2
0
1
2
0
1
8
1
6
9
O
P
R
)
SE
E
G
E
N
E
R
A
L
N
O
T
E
N
O
.
1
9
.
SEE GENERAL NOTE NO. 19.
LO
T
9
OP
E
N
S
P
A
C
E
BL
O
C
K
7
LO
T
7
OP
E
N
S
P
A
C
E
BL
O
C
K
5
LO
T
1
4
OP
E
N
S
P
A
C
E
BL
O
C
K
2
LOT 51
LOT 50
LOT 49
LOT 52
LOT 53
LOT 54
OPEN
SPACE
LOT 48
LOT 31,
B
L
O
C
K
1
GOLF C
O
U
R
S
E
&
D
R
A
I
N
A
G
E
E
S
M
'
T
.
TERAVI
S
T
A
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
1
3
B
(DOC. #
2
0
0
7
0
9
1
7
1
5
)
LOT 47
LOT 46
LOT 45
LOT 44
LOT 43
LOT 42
LOT 41
LOT 40
LOT 39
LOT 38
LOT 35
LOT 34
LOT 33
TERAVI
S
T
A
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
1
4
B
(DOC. #
2
0
0
9
0
3
4
9
9
1
)
25' STOR
M
&
W
A
T
E
R
E
S
M
'
T
.
(DOC. #
2
0
1
2
0
6
1
5
6
6
)
35' ACCE
S
S
E
S
M
'
T
.
(DOC. # 2
0
1
2
0
6
1
5
6
6
)
1/2" IRON
R
O
D
W
/
C
A
P
"BURY" F
O
U
N
D
1/2" IRON ROD W/CAP
"BURY" FOUND
1/2" IRO
N
R
O
D
W
/
C
A
P
"BURY" F
O
U
N
D
1/2" IRO
N
R
O
D
W
/
C
A
P
"BURY"
F
O
U
N
D
N1
8
°
4
2
'
4
5
"
W
S2
1
°
0
2
'
0
4
"
E
4
8
8
.
8
7
'
S77°55'46
"
W
1
2
8
.
6
7
'
S78°02'29
"
W
2
0
9
.
5
4
'
S78°49'4
1
"
W
1
0
1
9
.
4
5
'
S78°44'1
4
"
W
5
0
3
.
6
2
'
N1
8
°
4
2
'
4
5
"
W
6
7
2
.
3
0
'
S2
1
°
0
8
'
3
2
"
E
3
9
9
.
4
6
'
OW
N
E
R
:
N
N
P
-
T
E
R
A
V
I
S
T
A
,
L
P
N= 10184987.77
E= 3135137.25
27" ELM
N= 10185353.98
E= 3136962.12
VARIABLE WIDTH
DRAINAGE ESM'T.
(10.70 AC.)
VARIABLE WIDTH
DRAINAGE ESM'T.
(10.70 AC.)
L1
5
L16
L1
7
L
1
8
L19
L
2
0
L
2
1
L22
L2
3
L
2
4
L25
L2
6
L
2
7
L28
L2
9
L30
L3
1
L3
2
L3
3
L3
4
L4
2
L43
L4
4
L45
L4
6
L47 L48
L4
9
L50
L51
L52
L5
3
L54
L55
L5
6
L
5
7
L58
L5
9
L60
L61
L6
2
L
6
3
L6
4
L65
L
6
6
L
6
7
VARIABLE WIDTH
DRAINAGE ESM'T.
(10.70 AC.)
14
2
.
2
7
'
GEORGE
T
O
W
N
C
I
T
Y
L
I
M
I
T
S
GEORG
E
T
O
W
N
C
I
T
Y
L
I
M
I
T
S
ETJ
ETJ
GE
O
R
G
E
T
O
W
N
C
I
T
Y
L
I
M
I
T
S
ET
J
BLOCK 1
LOT 2
(40.51 ACRES)
BLOCK 1
(1,764,643.86 SQFT.)
MULTIFAMILY
WESTING HOUSE (CR11)
30.01'
19.54'
N72°32'03"E 146.12'
N72°32'03"E 142.51'
S25
°
1
0
'
3
2
"
W
7
7
.
6
1
'
N1
8
°
5
5
'
5
8
"
W
4
3
6
.
4
0
'
N1
8
°
5
5
'
5
8
"
W
4
3
5
.
6
3
'
85.58'
WESTINGHOUSE RD.
(CR 111)
N1
9
°
3
2
'
1
6
"
W
15
7
.
1
1
'
30
'
I
N
G
R
E
S
S
/
E
G
R
E
S
S
ES
M
'
T
.
(
0
.
4
9
0
A
C
.
)
VA
R
.
W
D
.
P
R
I
V
A
T
E
U
T
I
L
I
T
Y
ES
M
'
T
.
(
0
.
4
0
0
A
C
.
)
LOT 3
BLOCK 1
Date: Jan 17, 2017, 1:39pm User ID: dgonzales
File: P:\Williamson\31423-Mansions at Teravista at Westinghouse Rd\Design\Plats\sh-plat-31423.dwg
INDEX MAP
SHEET 3SHEET 1
LOT 1LOT 3
LOT 2
MATCH LINE SEE SHEET 1 OF 3 MATCH LINE SEE SHEET 3 OF 3
SHEET 2
DATE: 08/05/2016 JOB NO.: 31423/WILL
OF
MANSIONS OF GEORGETOWN
NO
R
T
H
CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS
MACINA BOSE COPELAND & ASSOC., INC.
(210) 545-1122 Fax (210) 545-9302 www.mbcengineers.com
1035 Central Parkway North, San Antonio, Texas 78232
E N G I N E E R S
FIRM REGISTRATION NUMBER: T.B.P.E. F-784 & T.B.P.L.S. 10011700
BEING 59.25 ACE TRACT OF LAND, BEING ALL OF THE CALLED 59.21 ACRE
TRACT DESCRIBED IN SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED RECORDED IN DOCUMENT
NUMBER 2015101552, OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS, WILLIAMSON COUNTY,
TEXAS.
FINAL PLAT
LOCATION MAP
SCALE: 1" = 3000'
NO
R
T
H
I.
H
.
3
5
CITY L
I
M
I
T
WESTI
N
G
H
O
U
S
E
R
O
A
D
COMM
E
R
C
E
CLEAR
V
I
E
W
R
A
B
B
I
T
H
I
L
L
R
O
A
D
CITY LIMIT
CITY LIMIT
ELEC.
TEL.
CATV
SAN. SWR.
ESM'T.
R.O.W.
VOL.
PG.
VAR. WD.
O.P.R.
PR
PUE
----- ELECTRIC
----- TELEPHONE
----- CABLE TELEVISION
----- SANITARY SEWER
----- EASEMENT
----- RIGHT-OF-WAY
----- VOLUME
----- PAGE
----- VARIABLE WIDTH
----- OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSONS COUNTY TEXAS
----- PLAT RECORDS OF WILLIAMSONS COUNTY TEXAS
----- PUBLIC UTILITY ESM'T.
----- CITY LIMITS LINE / ETJ
----- 14' ELECTRIC AND GAS EASEMENT
-----1/2" IRON ROD FOUND (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
----- 1/2" IRON ROD WITH CAP STAMPED "MBC ENGINEERS" SET
----- HERITAGE TREE
LEGEND:
A
PROJECT No. PFP - 2016 - 006 .
DETAIL "B"
SCALE: 1" = 50'
Page 11 of 67
50.00'847.30'
TE
R
A
V
I
S
T
A
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
3
1
1
A
N
D
3
1
2
(D
O
C
.
#
2
0
1
3
0
5
4
8
4
2
)
50' BUFFER AREA (DOC. # 2012018169 OPR)
SEE GENERAL NOTE NO. 19.
LO
T
9
OP
E
N
S
P
A
C
E
BL
O
C
K
7
LO
T
9
OP
E
N
S
P
A
C
E
BL
O
C
K
7
LO
T
6
OP
E
N
S
P
A
C
E
BL
O
C
K
9
1/2" IRON ROD W/CAP
"BURY" FOUND
WESTINGHOUSE ROAD (CR 111)
(VAR. WD. R.O.W.)
68
1
.
0
2
'
11.50'
11.5' R.O.W. DEDICATION (0.47 ACRES)
N68°41'26"E 1310.44'
S2
0
°
3
5
'
4
8
"
E
6
9
2
.
5
2
'
S21°02'04"E
488.87'
N
5
1
°
5
0
'
0
8
"
W
4
3
8
.
8
6
'
N68°41'18"E 617.62'
N2
0
°
3
5
'
4
8
"
W
5
0
8
.
5
4
'
11
2
'
±
58
.
5
0
'
70
'
Lc
N= 10186831.10
E= 3136398.95BENCHMARK A
N= 10186182.84
E= 3136642.57
10' PUE
L37
L3
8
L39
L41
L3
4
L4
2
VARIABLE WIDTH
DRAINAGE ESM'T.
(10.70 AC.)
SEE DETAIL "A"
ON THIS SHEET.
N
5
1
°
5
0
'
0
8
"
W
LOT 1
(8.88 ACRES)
BLOCK 1
(386,926.81 SQFT.)
COMMERCIAL
LOT 2
(40.51 ACRES)
BLOCK 1
(1,764,643.86 SQFT.)
MULTIFAMILY
GE
O
R
G
E
T
O
W
N
C
I
T
Y
L
I
M
I
T
S
ET
J
WESTING HOUSE (CR11)
L37
L3
8
L4
0
L39
L36
L41
L35
L4
2
L3
4
VARIABLE WIDTH
DRAINAGE ESM'T.
(10.70 AC.)
LOT 1
BLOCK 1
LOT 2
Date: Jan 17, 2017, 1:32pm User ID: dgonzales
File: P:\Williamson\31423-Mansions at Teravista at Westinghouse Rd\Design\Plats\sh-plat-31423.dwg
DATE: 08/05/2016 JOB NO.: 31423/WILL
OF
MANSIONS OF GEORGETOWN
NO
R
T
H
CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS
MACINA BOSE COPELAND & ASSOC., INC.
(210) 545-1122 Fax (210) 545-9302 www.mbcengineers.com
1035 Central Parkway North, San Antonio, Texas 78232
E N G I N E E R S
FIRM REGISTRATION NUMBER: T.B.P.E. F-784 & T.B.P.L.S. 10011700
MATCH LINE SEE SHEET 2 OF 3
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
1
O
F
3
INDEX MAP
SHEET 3SHEET 1
SHEET 2
LOT 1LOT 3
LOT 2
POINT OF BEGINNING
BEING 59.25 ACE TRACT OF LAND, BEING ALL OF THE CALLED 59.21 ACRE
TRACT DESCRIBED IN SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED RECORDED IN DOCUMENT
NUMBER 2015101552, OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS, WILLIAMSON COUNTY,
TEXAS.
FINAL PLAT
BASED UPON THE ABOVE REPRESENTATIONS OF THE ENGINEER OR SURVEYOR WHOSE SEAL IS AFFIXED
HERETO, AND AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PLAT AS REPRESENTED BY THE SAID ENGINEER OR SURVEYOR, I
FIND THAT THIS PLAT COMPLIES WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 15.44, FLOOD DAMAGE
PREVENTION, OF THE GEORGETOWN MUNICIPAL CODE, THIS CERTIFICATION IS MADE SOLELY UPON SUCH
REPRESENTATIONS AND SHOULD NOT BE RELIED UPON FOR VERIFICATIONS OF THE FACTS ALLEGED, THE
CITY OF GEORGETOWN DISCLAIMS ANY RESPONSIBILITY TO ANY MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC OR INDEPENDENT
VERIFICATIONS OF THE REPRESENTATION, FACTUAL OR OTHERWISE, CONTAINED IN THIS PLAT AND THE
DOCUMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH IT.
DAVE HALL, FLOODPLAIN COORDINATOR DATE
CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS
I, SOFIA NELSON , PLANNING DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, DO
HEREBY CERTIFY THIS PLAT IS APPROVED FOR FILING OF RECORD WITH THE COUNTY CLERK OF
WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS
SOFIA NELSON, CNU-A, PLANNING DIRECTOR DATE
I, ROGER W. GUNDERMAN , REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER IN THE STATE OF TEXAS, DO HEREBY
CERTIFY THAT THIS MANSIONS OF GEORGETOWN SUBDIVISION, IS NOT IN THE EDWARDS AQUIFER RECHARGE
ZONE AND IS NOT ENCROACHED BY A ZONE A FLOOD AREA, AS DENOTED HEREIN, AND AS DEFINED BY FEDERAL
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION FLOOD HAZARD BOUNDARY MAP, COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER
4891C 0485 E , EFFECTIVE DATE SEPTEMBER 26, 2008 , AND THAT EACH LOT CONFORMS TO THE CITY OF
GEORGETOWN REGULATIONS.
THE FULLY DEVELOPED, CONCENTRATED STORMWATER RUNOFF RESULTING FROM THE ONE HUNDRED (100)
YEAR FREQUENCY STORM IS CONTAINED WITHIN THE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS SHOWN AND/OR PUBLIC
RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATED BY THIS PLAT.
TO CERTIFY WHICH, WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL AT SAN ANTONIO , BEXAR COUNTY , TEXAS, THIS DAY
OF 20 .
ROGER W. GUNDERMAN .
REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
NO. 103537 STATE OF TEXAS.
STATE OF TEXAS {
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS
COUNTY OF BEXAR {
I, JOEL CHRISTIAN JOHNSON , REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF
TEXAS, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT IS TRUE AND CORRECTLY MADE FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY
MADE ON THE GROUND OF THE PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED HEREON, AND THAT THERE ARE NO
APPARENT DISCREPANCIES, CONFLICTS, OVERLAPPING OF IMPROVEMENTS, VISIBLE UTILITY LINES OR
ROADS IN PLACE EXCEPT AS SHOWN ON THE ACCOMPANYING PLAT, AND THAT THE CORNER MONUMENTS
SHOWN THEREON WERE PROPERTY PLACED UNDER MY SUPERVISION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF
GEORGETOWN REGULATIONS.
TO CERTIFY WHICH, WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL AT SAN ANTONIO , BEXAR COUNTY , TEXAS, THIS DAY
OF , 20 .
JOEL CHRISTIAN JOHNSON .
REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR
No. 5578 STATE OF TEXAS
STATE OF TEXAS {
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS
COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON {
I, NANCY E. RISTER , CLERK OF THE COUNTY COURT OF SAID COUNTY, DO HEREBY
CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT IN WRITING, WITH ITS CERTIFICATE WAS
FILED FOR RECORD IN MY OFFICE ON THE DAY OF , 2017, A.D. AT
O'CLOCK .M. AND DULY RECORDED THIS THE DAY OF , 2017, A.D.,
AT O'CLOCK .M. IN THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY IN
DOCUMENT NO. .
TO CERTIFY WHICH, WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL AT THE COUNTY COURT OF SAID
COUNTY, AT MY OFFICE IN GEORGETOWN, TEXAS THE DATE LAST SHOWN ABOVE
WRITTEN.
NANCY E. RISTER, CLERK
COUNTY COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS
BY: , DEPUTY
STATE OF TEXAS {
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS
COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON {
I, MATTHEW J. HILES SOLE OWNER OF THE CERTAIN 59.25 ACRE TRACT OF
LAND SHOWN HEREON AND DESCRIBED IN A DEED RECORDED IN DOCUMENT No.
OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, AND DO
HEREBY SUBDIVIDE SAID TRACT AS SHOWN HEREON, AND DO HEREBY CONSENT TO
ALL PLAT NOTE REQUIREMENTS SHOWN HEREON, AND DO HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE
CITY OF GEORGETOWN THE STREETS, ALLEYS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY, EASEMENTS AND
PUBLIC PLACES SHOWN HEREON FOR SUCH PUBLIC PURPOSES AS THE CITY OF
GEORGETOWN MAY DEEM APPROPRIATE. THIS SUBDIVISION IS TO BE KNOWN AS FINAL
PLAT OF "MANSIONS OF GEORGETOWN".
TO CERTIFY WHICH, WITNESS BY MY HAND THIS DAY OF
, 2017.
BY: .
MATHEW J. MILES, VICE PRESIDENT
WESTERN RIM INVESTORS 2016-5, L.P.,
A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
2505 NORTH STATE HIGHWAY360, SUITE 800
GRAND PRAIRIE, TX. 75050
STATE OF TEXAS {
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS
COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON {
BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED, A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID COUNTY AND
STATE, ON THIS DAY PERSONALLY APPEARED MATTHEW J. HILES ,
KNOWN TO ME TO BE THE PERSON WHOSE NAME IS SUBSCRIBED TO THE FOREGOING
INSTRUMENT.
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE THIS DAY OF
, 2017.
NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES ON: .
THIS SUBDIVISION TO BE KNOWN AS FINAL PLAT OF MANSIONS OF GEORGETOWN HAS
BEEN ACCEPTED AND APPROVED FOR FILING OF RECORD WITH THE COUNTY CLERK OF
WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE
GEORGETOWN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ON THE DAY OF ,
20 , A.D.
JOSH SCHROEDER, CHAIRMAN DATE .
DATE .
LOCATION MAP
SCALE: 1" = 3000'
NO
R
T
H
I.
H
.
3
5
CITY L
I
M
I
T
WESTI
N
G
H
O
U
S
E
R
O
A
D
COMM
E
R
C
E
CLEAR
V
I
E
W
R
A
B
B
I
T
H
I
L
L
R
O
A
D
CITY LIMIT
CITY LIMIT
DETAIL "A"
N.T.S.
ELEC.
TEL.
CATV
SAN. SWR.
ESM'T.
R.O.W.
VOL.
PG.
VAR. WD.
O.P.R.
PR
PUE
----- ELECTRIC
----- TELEPHONE
----- CABLE TELEVISION
----- SANITARY SEWER
----- EASEMENT
----- RIGHT-OF-WAY
----- VOLUME
----- PAGE
----- VARIABLE WIDTH
----- OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF WILLIAMSONS COUNTY TEXAS
----- PLAT RECORDS OF WILLIAMSONS COUNTY TEXAS
----- PUBLIC UTILITY ESM'T.
----- CITY LIMITS LINE / ETJ
----- 14' ELECTRIC AND GAS EASEMENT
-----1/2" IRON ROD FOUND (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
----- 1/2" IRON ROD WITH CAP STAMPED "MBC ENGINEERS" SET
----- HERITAGE TREE
LEGEND:
A
PROJECT No. PFP - 2016 - 006 .
Page 12 of 67
City of Georgetown, Texas
Planning and Zoning
February 21, 2017
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing and p o s s ib le ac tion on a reques t to Rezone Georgetown R etirement Residence, Bloc k A,
Lot 2, 2.208 ac res , loc ated at 3700 Williams Drive, fro m the Agric ultural (AG) Dis tric t to the Lo cal
Commerc ial (C-1) Dis tric t. (REZ-2016-038) Matt Synats chk, His toric Planner
ITEM SUMMARY:
Background:
The ap p licant has reques ted to rezo ne the 2.208 acre trac t fro m Agriculture (AG) Dis trict, as s igned up o n
annexatio n in 2006, to Lo cal Commerc ial (C-1) Dis tric t to allo w fo r c o mmerc ial us e of the property.
Public Comment:
To d ate, no written pub lic comments have been received .
Staff Recommendation:
Staff rec o mmend s approval of the reques t to rezone the 2.208 acre trac t to the C-1 Dis tric t.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None studied at this time.
SUBMITTED BY:
Matt Synatsc hk, His toric P lanner
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
REZ-2016-038 Staff Report Backup Material
Attachment 1 - Location Map Backup Material
Attachment 2 - Future Land Us e Map Backup Material
Attachment 3 - Zoning Map Backup Material
Attachment 4 - Aerial Map Backup Material
Attachment 5 - C-1 Zoning Dis trict Development Standards and
Land Us es
Backup Material
Page 13 of 67
Georgetown Planning Department Staff Report
3700 Williams Drive rezoning
AG to C‐1 Page 1 of 4
Report Date: January 26, 2017
File No: REZ‐2016‐038
Project Planner: Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner
Item Details
Project Address: 3700 Williams Dr.
Total Acreage: 2.208 acres
Legal Description: Georgetown Retirement Residence,
Block A, Lot 2
Existing Zoning: Agricultural (AG)
Proposed Zoning: Local Commercial (C‐1)
Overview of Applicant’s Request
The applicant is requesting a zoning change from the Agricultural District (AG) to the Local
Commercial District (C‐1). This application is accompanied by a Special Exception
application, which will be reviewed by the Zoning Board of Adjustment.
Site Information
Location:
The subject site is located on the south side of Williams Drive, close to the intersection of
Williams Drive and Wagon Wheel Trail.
Physical Characteristics:
The property is developed with a house converted to a commercial structure most recently used
for contractor services. The lot has several large trees and an unimproved parking area. One
driveway allows access on Williams Drive.
Surrounding Properties:
Location Zoning Future Land Use Existing Use
North C‐3 Mixed Use Neighborhood Center Retail Sales, Office Use
South C‐1 Mixed Use Neighborhood Center Retirement Center
East C‐1 Mixed Use Neighborhood Center Unimproved land, Office Use
West C‐1 Mixed Use Neighborhood Center Retirement Center
Property History
The Property was annexed in 2006 and assigned the base AG zoning district, the default zoning
Page 14 of 67
Planning Department Staff Report
3700 Williams Drive Rezoning
AG to C‐1 Page 2 of 4
district assigned at time of annexation. Several uses, including general retail, general contractor
services and personal services, were located on the property at time of annexation. However,
because these uses did not conform to the allowable uses in the AG zoning district, they were
deemed to be nonconforming uses and no longer allowed once removed from the site.
2030 Comprehensive Plan
Future Land Use:
The 2030 Future Land Use category for this subject site is Mixed Use Neighborhood Center. The
Mixed Use Neighborhood Center category is described in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan as applying
to smaller areas of mixed commercial use within existing and new neighborhoods. These areas
are primarily proposed adjacent to, or as part of, larger residential neighborhoods.
Neighborhood‐serving mixed‐use areas abut roadway corridors or are located at key
intersections. These compact centers provide limited retail goods and services to a local customer
base, while having minimal impact on the surrounding residential uses.
Growth Tier:
The subject property is located within Growth Tier 1A, which is that portion of the City where
infrastructure systems are in place or can be economically provided, and where the bulk of the
City’s growth should be guided to short term. At the time the subject area is redeveloped, Utility
Evaluations may be required to determine capacity and potential public improvements to serve
the project.
Transportation
The subject property’s only access is from Williams Drive, identified as a major arterial roadway
in the City’s Overall Transportation Plan. There are no new driveways proposed at this time.
Utilities
The property is served by the City of Georgetown‘s electric, water and wastewater service. The
Development Engineer has determined there is adequate capacity for development.
Proposed Zoning District
The C‐1 District is intended to provide areas for commercial and retail activities that primarily
serve residential areas. Uses should have pedestrian access to adjacent and nearby residential
areas, but are not appropriate along residential streets or residential collectors. The district is
more appropriate along major and minor thoroughfares and collectors.
Staff Analysis
The subject property is located within the Future Land Use category of Mixed Use Neighborhood
Center. The first land use goal of the 2030 Plan encourages a balanced mix of residential,
Page 15 of 67
Planning Department Staff Report
3700 Williams Drive Rezoning
AG to C‐1 Page 3 of 4
commercial, and employment uses to reflect a gradual transition of development throughout the
city. The owner’s desire is to reuse the property in its current configuration with the goal to
redevelop the property.
The subject property maintains frontage along Williams Drive, which is identified as a major
arterial in the 2035 Thoroughfare Plan. In addition, the property is located in close proximity to a
mix of residential housing types. The C‐1 District is an appropriate district for this location given
the comprehensive plan guidance, location and surrounding uses.
The proposed rezoning request meets all of the criteria established in UDC Section 3.06.030 for
zoning changes:
Comply Do Not
Comply
Approval Criteria for Rezoning
X The application is complete
and the information contained
within the application is
sufficient and correct enough
to allow adequate review and
final action
An application must provide the necessary
information to review and make a knowledgeable
decision in order for staff to schedule an application
for consideration by P&Z and City Council. This
application was reviewed by staff and deemed to be
complete.
X The zoning change is consistent
with the Comprehensive Plan
The proposed zoning change is consistent with the
Future Land Use of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The
request is consistent with the goal to maintain and
strengthen viable land uses and land use patterns (e.g.,
stable neighborhoods, economically sound commercial
and employment areas, etc.).
X The zoning change promotes
the health, safety or general
welfare of the City and the safe
orderly, and healthful
development of the City
The zoning change request promotes the health, safety
and general welfare of the City. The new zoning
district is appropriate in this location along a major
arterial.
X The zoning change is
compatible with the present
zoning and conforming uses of
nearby property and with the
character of the neighborhood
The proposed rezoning is compatible with the
surrounding C‐1 zoning districts. The uses allowed in
the C‐1 district are compatible with the adjacent uses,
as they are also allowed in C‐1 zoning.
X The property to be rezoned is
suitable for uses permitted by
the District that would be
applied by the proposed
amendment.
The uses allowed in the C‐1 District are suitable
adjacent to the existing office, light commercial and
group living developments in the area.
Page 16 of 67
Planning Department Staff Report
3700 Williams Drive Rezoning
AG to C‐1 Page 4 of 4
General Findings
Based on all the information presented, staff has made the following findings:
1. The Future Land Use category of Mixed Use Neighborhood Center supports the request of
commercial zoning proposed by the applicant.
2. Goal 1 of the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan states that the City should
“promote sound, sustainable, and compact development patterns with balanced land uses, a variety
of housing choices and well‐integrated transportation, public facilities, and open space amenities.”
The rezoning of this property to the C‐1 District supports this goal.
3. Goal 4 of the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan states that the City should
“maintain and strengthen viable land uses and land use patterns (e.g., stable neighborhoods,
economically sound commercial and employment areas, etc.).” The rezoning of this property to
the C‐1 District to complement the existing office, commercial and other non‐residential
uses along this stretch of Williams Drive supports this goal.
4. Williams Drive, a major arterial, can support the uses allowed in the C‐1 district.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the applicant’s zoning request based on the above‐mentioned
findings.
Public Comments
As required by the Unified Development Code, all property owners within a 200 foot radius of
the subject property that are located within City limits were notified of the rezoning application
(9 notices mailed), a legal notice advertising the public hearing was placed in the Williamson
County Sun Newspaper (February 5, 2017) and signs were posted on‐site. To date, staff has
received zero written letters in support or opposition of this request.
Attachments
Attachment 1 – Location Map
Attachment 2 – Future Land Use Map
Attachment 3 – Zoning Map
Attachment 4 – C‐1 District Development Standards and Permitted Land Uses
Attachment 5 – Public Notice Responses
Page 17 of 67
B O O T Y S C R O S S I N G RD
N IH 35
LAKEWAYDR
NOR
T
H
W
E
S
T
B
L
V
D
SERENADADR
W
IL
LIA
M
S D
R
A
I
R
P
O
R
T
R
D
W
I
L
L
O
W
L
N
S E R E N A D A D R
S H A D Y H O L L O W D R
SHELL RD
RIVE
R R
D
O
A
K L
N
P
A
R
K L
N
WESPARADADR
VERDE VISTA
ROYAL DR
MIRAMAR DR
TERRY LN
VAL VERDE DR
W
O
O
D
LANDRD
G R E E N RID G E R D
WILDW O O D D R
WIL D W O O D D R
D U N M A N D R
HIG
H
VIE
W RD
C A N Y O N R D
ADDIE LN
H A L M A R C V
RUSTLE CV
CLAY ST
MALAGA DR
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
D
R
P A R K E R C I R
TIF F A N Y L N
COUNTRY RD
G
A
B
RIE
L
VIE
W D
R
TORTOISE LN
W S
E
Q
U
OIA TR
L
ENCLAVE TRL
E E S P A R A D A D R
T
U
RTLEBEND
G O L D E N OAKS RD
R O B L E
G R A N D E C I R
WHISPER OAKS LN
NORTHCROSS RD
CREE KDR
CLIFFW O OD D R
FAIRVIEW RD
RIVER BEND DR
L
O
N
E
S
O
M
E T
R
L
BRANDYLN
A
P
P
L
E
C
R
E
E
K
D
R
S
H
A
N
G
A
R
D
R
C O U N T R Y C L U B R D
LAS PLUMAS DR
OAK RIDGE CIR
LAKEOVERLOO K R D
JU D Y D R
SUTTON PL
SPRING
VA LLEYRD
B
R
O
K
E
N S
P
O
K
E T
R
L
W S E Q U O I A S P U R
MANZANITA
DR
R
O
C
K
Y H
O
L
L
O
W
T
R
L
ROBLE CIR
SHANNON LNW CENTRAL DR
B R A N D Y L N
WOODWAY DR
CROS S LANDDR
T
U
R
TL
E C
V
S
N
A
P
P
E
R
C
V
N O R T H W O O D D R
WINDFLOWER LN
KIMBERLY ST
WRIGHT
BROTHERS DR
M
E
S
Q
UIT
E
L
N
W
O
O
D
-
B
I
N
E
C
I
R
KATHI LN
§¨¦35
S T E A R M A N D R
G A R D E N M E A D O W D R
L A V A C A L N
HORSESHOE TRL
MELISSA CT
BL
U
E
B
O
N
N
E
T T
R
L
CO
RS
AIR
D
R
P
O
W
E
R
C
I
R
P A R K M E A D O W B LV D
SHEPHERD RD M O R S E C V
O A K RID G E R D
T
E
X
A
S
T
R
A
D
I
T
I
O
N
S
B
R
A
Z
O
S
D
R
WILLIAMS DR
T H O R N W O O D R D
VER
N
A
SPU
R
P O W E R R D
LE A N N E D R
E JANIS DR
HE DG E W O O D DR
C O N C H O T R L
P
E
C
A
N
D
R
S O L O N A C I R
LA PALOMA
PEC OS C T
CACTUS TRL
GARDEN VIEW DR
STACEY LNOAKCRESTLN
GARDEN VILLA DR
WINDMILL CV
PA R K W AY S T
WIN D H O LL O W D R
C
A
N
D
L
E
L
I
T
E
C
I
R
FO
UST TRL
T O L E D O T R L
WASHAM DR
MIRIQUITA RD
SOUTHCROSSRD
T E R L I N G U A T R L
COTTON
W
O
OD DR
S
A
B
I
N
E
D
R
OLD MILL RD
VERDE CT
B
U
FF
A
L
O S
P
RIN
G
S T
R
L
RICHLAND LN
PARKER D
RM
E
L
A
N
I
E
L
N
RIDGECREST RD
H A W T H O R N E C V
JO H N T H O M AS D R
HAGAN CT
WAGON WHEEL TRL
BEDFORDCT
C A C T U S T R L
G O L D E N O A K S D R
B RIA R-
W O O D D R
WESTWOOD LNRIVER B E N D D R
ALGERITA D R
CEDAR LAKE BLVD
V
I
L
L
A
G
E
D
R
HARD W OOD
GROVES BLVD
GRAPEVINESPRINGSCV
S
P
RING W O ODL
N
SUTTON PL
R
I
D
G
E
C
R
E
S
T
R
D
D B WOOD RD
BOOTYS CROSSING RD
S K INNER S L N
PA R K W AY S T
W
E
S
P
A
R
A
D
A
D
R
RAMADA TRL
CEDAR BREAKS RD
STAGECOACH DR
B U T T E R M I L K G A P
OAK GROVE LN
R A N D O L P H R D
QUAIL LN
DAW
N DR
LA PALOMA
A
E
R
O
D
R
W E S T E R N T R L
ARROWHEAD LN
N
O
R
T
H
W
E
S T BLVD
GOLDENOAKS RD
OAK
C
RE
ST
LN
GOLDEN
CREST DR
GOLDEN VISTA DR
GARDEN
VILLA CIRSILVERLEAF DR
THORNTON LN
MESQUITE LN
HEDGE-WOOD DR
C L E A R S P R I N G S R D
PARKVIEW DR
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
D
R
OAK LN
E JANIS DR
PARK LN
R A N C H R D
OAK LN
DA
W
N D
R
COTTON
W
OOD DR
SEVILLA DR
S P A N I S H O A K D R
OAK LN
WESTWOOD LN
P
RIM
R
O
S
E T
R
L
PARKER DR
AD
DIE LN
SERENADA DR
WILLIA
M
S D
R
PARKER DR
MADRID DR
GABRIELVIEWDR
RI V E R Y B L V D
D B WOOD RD
W
S
E
Q
U
O
IA T
R
L
W
IL
LIA
M
S D
R
L
A
S
P
L
U
M
A
S
C
T
MESA SPUR
T E R M I N A L D R
H
A
N
G
A
R
R
D
E STRELLACROSSING
L U C I N D A T E RRACE
A V I A T I O N D R
V
E
N
A
D
AT
R
L
(R iver /S tream)
REZ-2 016-0 38Exhibit #1
Co ord inate System: Texas Sta te Plane/Centra l Zone/NAD 83/U S FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purp oses Only
¯
Locati on Map Le ge n dSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
0 0.2 5 0.5Mi le s
Page 18 of 67
B O O T Y S C R O S S I N G R D
NORT
H
W
E
S
T
B
L
V
D
SERENADADR
W
IL
LIA
M
S D
R
WILLIAMS DR
D B WOOD RD
BOOTYS CROSSING RD
Coo rd inate Sys tem: Te xas S tate Plane/C entral Zone/N AD 83/U S FeetCartographic D ata Fo r General Planning Purposes O nly
¯
Future Land Use / Overall Transportation Plan
Exhi bit #2
REZ-20 16 -03 8
Legend
Thoroughfare
Future Land Use
Institutional
Regi onal Commercial
Community Commerc ial
Em ployment Center
Low Dens ity Residential
Mining
Mix ed Us e Community
Mix ed Us e Neighborhood Center
Moderate Density Residential
Open Space
Specialty Mixed Us e Area
Ag / Rural Residential
Ex isting Collector
Ex isting Freeway
Ex isting Major Arterial
Ex isting Minor Arterial
Ex isting Ramp
Pr oposed Collector
Pr oposed Freeway
Pr opsed Frontage Road
Pr oposed Major Arterial
Pr oposed Minor Arterial
Pr oposed Railroad
High Density Residential
0 ¼½¾Mi
Le ge ndSi teParcelsCity Lim itsGeorgetown ETJ
Page 19 of 67
B O O T Y S C R O S S I N G R D
NORT
H
W
E
S
T
B
L
V
D
SERENADADR
W
IL
LIA
M
S D
R
WILLIAMS DR
D B WOOD RD
BOOTYS CROSSING RD
Zon in g Inf ormationREZ-2 016-0 38Exhibit #3
Co ord inate System: Texas Sta te Plane/Centra l Zone/NAD 83/U S FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purp oses Only
Le ge n dSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
¯
0 ¼½¾MiPage 20 of 67
W
IL
LIA
M
S D
R
R
O
C
K
Y
H
O
L
L
O
W
T
R
L
AXIS LP
W AGON WHEELTRL
W E S T E R N T R L
P
R
I
M
R
O
S
E T
R
L
B
U
FF
A
L
O S
P
RIN
G
S T
R
L
B
R
O
K
E
N
S
P
O
K
E
T
R
L
BOOTYSCROSSINGRD
DEER HAVEN DR
OAK RIDGE CIR
L
O
N
E
S
O
M
E
T
R
L
O
A
K
C
R
E
S
T
LN
BRIA R W O O D D R
HED G E W O O D D R
V
E
R
N
A S
P
U
R
S
P
RIN
G
W
O
O
D L
N
W
H
ITETAILCV
ALG ERITA D R
HORSES
H
O
E
T
R
L
L A K E W A Y D RCoordinate System: Texas Sta te Plane/Centra l Zone/NAD 83/U S FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purp oses Only
¯
Aerial
REZ-2 016-0 38 Le ge n d
SiteCity Limits
0 500 1,000Feet
Page 21 of 67
Maximum Building Height = 35 feet Front Setback = 25 feet Bufferyard = 15 feet with plantings
Maximum Building Size = .5 FAR (0 feet for build‐to/downtown) adjacent to AG, RE, RL, RS, TF, MH,
(only applies to those uses Side Setback = 10 feet MF‐1, or MF‐2 districts
marked with * below) Side Setback to Residential = 15 feet
Rear Setback = 0 feet
Rear Setback to Residential = 25 feet
Allowed by Right Subject to Limitations Special Use Permit (SUP) Required
Agricultural Sales* Activity Center (youth/senior) Event Facility
Artisan Studio/Gallery* Bar/Tavern/Pub Meat Market
Assisted Living Bed and Breakfast (with events) Multifamily Attached
Automotive Parts Sales (indoor)* Business/Trade School Personal Services Restricted
Banking/Financial Services* Car Wash Private Transport Dispatch Facility
Blood/Plasma Center* Church (with columbarium) Student Housing
Consumer Repair* College/University
Dry Cleaning Service* Commercial Recreation
Emergency Services Station Community Center
Farmer's Market* Dance Hall/Night Club
Fitness Center* Day Care (group/commercial)
Food Catering Services* Fuel Sales
Funeral Home* Live Music/Entertainment
General Retail* Micro Brewery/Winery
General Office* Neighborhood Amenity Center
Government/Postal Office Park (neighborhood/regional)
Group Home (7+ residents) Pest Control/Janitorial Services
Home Health Care Services* Self‐Storage (indoor only)
Hospital School (Elementary, Middle, High)
Hotel/Inn (excluding extended stay) Theater (movie/live)
Integrated Office Center* Upper‐story Residential
Landscape/Garden Sales* Wireless Transmission Facility (<41')
Laundromat*
Library/Museum
Medical Diagnostic Center*
Medical Office/Clinic/Complex*
Membership Club/Lodge*
Nature Preserve/Community Garden
Nursing/Convalescent/Hospice
Parking Lot (commercial/park‐n‐ride)
Personal Services*
Printing/Mailing/Copying Services*
Restaurant (general/drive‐through)*
Rooming/Boarding House
Social Service Facility
Surgery/Post Surgery Recovery*
Urgent Care Facility*
Utilities (Minor/Intermediate/Major)
Veterinary Clinic (indoor only)*
Local Commercial (C‐1) District
District Development Standards
Specific Uses Allowed within the District
Page 22 of 67
City of Georgetown, Texas
Planning and Zoning
February 21, 2017
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing and p o s s ib le ac tion on a reques t to Rezone approximately 340.5 acres in the David
Wright Survey Abs tract No . 13, the William Roberts S urvey Ab s trac t No. 524, and the John Berry Survey
Abstract No . 51 lo c ated at 6025 Airp o rt Road fro m S ingle F amily Residential (R S), Multi-family 1 (MF-1),
and Planned Unit Development (PUD) Distric t to Planned Unit Develo p ment (PUD) District . (REZ-2016-
022, Ho mes tead at Berry Creek) Sofia Nelso n, P lanning Directo r.
ITEM SUMMARY:
Background:
The ap p licant has reques ted to rezo ne the und eveloped 340.5 acre trac t from Single Family Res id ential
(RS ), Multi-family 1 (MF -1), and P lanned Unit Develo p ment (P UD) Dis tric t to P lanned Unit Development
(PUD) Distric t. The proposed PUD plans fo r a mas ter p lanned develo p ment c ons is ting o f a maximum of
985 units, a variety of hous ing products such as trad itional single family homes , townho mes , multifamily
homes, and single family c o ndo regime hous ing (multip le single family homes on one lot). Ad d itionally, the
d eveloper is p lanning a commerc ial no d e alo ng the s o uthern end the trac t along Airp o rt Road and is
coordinating with GIS D to res erve an elementary s c hool s ite. The rezo ning of this property to PUD is
p ro ceeding co nc urrently to City Co uncil with a req ues t for cons ent to a Munic ip al Utility District
Public Comment:
To d ate, no written pub lic comments have been received .
Staff Recommendation:
Staff rec o mmend s approval of the reques t.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
n/a
SUBMITTED BY:
Sofia Nelson, C NU-A, P lanning Directo r
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Staff Report Backup Material
exhibit 1 Location map Backup Material
exhibit 2 future land us e map Backup Material
exhibit 3 zoning map Backup Material
exhibit 4 PUD Plan Backup Material
exhibit 5 aerial map Backup Material
Page 23 of 67
Georgetown Planning Department Staff Report
The Homestead at Berry Creek
REZ-2016-022 Page 1 of 6
Report Date: February 13, 2017
File No.: REZ-2016-022
Project Planner: Sofia Nelson, Planning Director
Item Details
Project Name: The Homestead at Berry Creek
Project Address: 6025 Airport Road
Location: Generally located east of Airport Road and west of I-35 and bounded by
Airport Road and Berry Creek.
Total Acreage: 340.5 acres
Applicant: Gary Newman, Trio Development
Property Owner: Glynn Buie
Existing Use: Undeveloped
Existing Zoning: RS, MF-1, and PUD
Proposed Zoning: Planned Unit Development District (PUD) with the following base zoning
districts:
• Residential Single Family (RS)
• Townhouse (TH)
• Multi-family (MF-1)
• General Commercial (C-3)
• Public Facilities (PF)
Future Land Use: Employment Center and Moderate Density Residential
Overview of Applicant’s Request
The subject property is located east of Airport Road and west of I-35 along the banks of Berry
Creek. The property is currently zoned Local Commercial (C-1), Residential Single Family (RS),
Residential Estate (RE), and Planned Unit Development (PUD). The applicant is seeking to
develop the site into a master planned development with a maximum of 985 units consisting of a
variety of housing products such as traditional single family homes, townhomes, multifamily
homes, and single family condo regime housing (multiple single family homes on one lot).
Additionally, the developer is planning a commercial node along the southern end the tract along
Airport Road and is coordinating with GISD to reserve an elementary school site. The rezoning
of this property to PUD is proceeding concurrently to City Council with a request for consent to
a Municipal Utility District.
Page 24 of 67
Planning Department Staff Report
The Homestead at Berry Creek
REZ-2016-022 Page 2 of 6
Site Information
Physical Characteristics:
The subject property is currently undeveloped with a mix of gently sloping farmland with
gentle grades and wooded steep slopes along the edges of the Berry Creek floodplain. The
property generally drains toward the northeast into Berry Creek.
Surrounding Properties:
The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows:
Utilities:
Water, wastewater and electric served by the City of Georgetown. Water and wastewater will
need to be extended to the site and a plan is in place to provide adequate service for this
development.
Transportation:
Access to the subject property is from Airport Road which borders the property’s western
boundary. There will be three entrances from Airport Road with a major collector roadway
connecting the northern and southern most entrances, and stubs to the property to the south for
eventual connection. A network of collector roads and local streets will provide internal
connectivity.
Master Plan Guidance
This property is designated as Employment Center and Moderate Density Residential on the 2030
Plan-Future Land Use Map. The moderate land use category is comprised of single family
neighborhoods that can be accommodated at a density ranging between 3.1 and 6 dwelling units
per gross acre, with housing types including small-lot detached and attached single-family
dwellings (such as townhomes). This future land use designation is also envisioned to support
complementary non-residential uses along arterial roadways such as neighborhood-serving
retail, office, institutional, and civic uses.
The Employment Center designation is intended for tracts of undeveloped land located at
strategic locations, which are designated for well planned, larger scale employment and business
activities, as well as supporting uses such as retail, services, hotels, and high density residential
development (stand-alone or in mixed-use buildings). These areas often act as a transition
between more intensely developed commercial uses and residential neighborhoods.
Location Zoning Future Land Use Existing Use
North Agriculture Open Space Undeveloped
South Agriculture Employment Center Undeveloped
East Industrial (I) and
Commercial (C-3) Open Space Undeveloped
West Outside the City Limits Low Density Residential Residential (ETJ)
Page 25 of 67
Planning Department Staff Report
The Homestead at Berry Creek
REZ-2016-022 Page 3 of 6
Zoning District
The PUD Development Plan establishes the following significant development standards:
• Units:
o The residential unit count on the Property shall not exceed 985 units.
• Lot Width:
o The minimum lot width for single family detached residential shall be 45 feet. In
order to ensure product diversity, the following single family detached residential
percentages shall apply to the Property:
A maximum of 25% of the total single family detached lots may have lot
widths less than 50 feet
A minimum of 20% of the total single family detached lots shall have lot
widths of 60 feet or larger
• Masonry Requirements:
o Residential: The exterior surface area of all first floor residential elevations shall
consist of 100% brick, stone, or stucco. The façades of all second story residential
elevations shall be 100% brick, stone, stucco or cementitious fiber planking
(exclusive of roofs, eaves, dormers, soffits, windows, doors, gables, garage doors,
decorative trim and trim work). All walls must include materials and design
characteristics consistent with those on the front. Lesser quality materials or details
for side or rear walls are prohibited.
o Nonresidential: The exterior of all buildings on non-residential lots shall be
constructed of at least 75% brick, stone, stucco or other masonry products, or
architecturally treated tilt wall, exclusive of roofs, eaves, soffits, windows, doors,
gables and frame work.
• Architectural Requirements:
o All Single family detached dwellings shall contain a minimum of 1,200 square feet.
o The front elevation of all homes shall contain wall plane articulation.
o No elevations shall be a single wall plane across the entire width of the front
elevation.
o Each front elevation shall contain a minimum of two of the following elements:
A minimum of two wall planes on the front elevation, offset a minimum of
18 inches
Covered front porch or patio with a minimum size of 60 square feet
A side-entry or swing-in garage entry (for garage doors that do not face the
front street)
A garage door recessed from the primary front façade a minimum of four
feet (for garage doors that face the front street)
Enhanced garage door materials (wood, ornamental metal, decorative
door, window inserts and hardware, painted or stained to match house)
Shed roof or trellis (at least 18” deep) above garage door for additional
architectural detail
A combination of at least two roof types (e.g., hip and gable) or two
Page 26 of 67
Planning Department Staff Report
The Homestead at Berry Creek
REZ-2016-022 Page 4 of 6
different roof planes of varying height and/or direction
Two or more masonry finishes to compliment the architectural style of the
home
The addition of one or more dormers on the front elevation to complement
the architectural style of the home.
• Open Space:
o A minimum of 20 acres of public parkland will be provided.
o The construction of an approximately 6,500 linear foot trail shall be constructed
the entire length of Berry Creek as it traverses the Property, be ten (10) feet wide,
and be made of concrete.
o The public parkland acreage and construction of Berry Creek Trail, will be
dedicated to the City.
o The Berry Creek frontage parkland and associated trail may be dedicated and
constructed in up to three (3) phases.
o Forty-seven additional acres of open space area will be maintained on the Property
by the Homeowner’s Association, consisting of private space area will be trail
corridors, greenbelts, floodplain, slopes, landscape buffers and drainage areas.
o A minimum of one private amenity center for residents of the Property will be
provided. The private amenity center will contain at least two (2) playgrounds.
One playground for ages 2-5 and one for ages 5-12.
Staff Analysis
A PUD is designed to be used in conjunction with a designated base zoning district. An
application for PUD zoning shall specify the base district(s) and the uses proposed. The standards
and requirements of the specified base district shall apply unless specifically superseded by the
standards and requirements of the PUD Development Plan. In addition to the zoning change
approval criteria, the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council shall consider the
following specific objectives and criteria for approving the PUD:
Rezoning to and development under the PUD District will be permitted only in accordance with
the following specific objectives:
Consistent Not
Consistent
UDC Criteria
X A variety of housing types, employment opportunities, or
commercial services to achieve a balanced community;
The proposed development will consist of a variety of residential
development units, parkland, commercial development, and civic
space.
X An orderly and creative arrangement of all land uses with respect to
each other and to the entire community;
Page 27 of 67
Planning Department Staff Report
The Homestead at Berry Creek
REZ-2016-022 Page 5 of 6
The concept plan has been designed to allow higher density near the
southern and western end of the property to allow for a transition
of higher intensity uses to lower intensity residential units from
Airport Road to Berry Creek.
X A planned and integrated comprehensive transportation system
providing for a separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic, to
include facilities such as roadways, bicycle ways, and pedestrian
walkways;
A series of cross-sections have been codified as part of this PUD
plan. The cross-sections provide for pedestrian and vehicular
traffic. Additionally, open space and trail ways have been designed
to allow for access through the community.
X The provisions of cultural or recreational facilities for all segments
of the community
Active and passive open and recreation space have been designed to
allow for provisions for all segments of the community.
X The location of general building envelopes to take maximum
advantage of the natural and manmade environment; and
Open space along Berry Creeks has been preserved to take
maximum advantage of the natural environment.
X The staging of development in a manner which can be
accommodated by the timely provision of public utilities, facilities,
and services.
The applicant is closely coordinating with the City for the
construction of the wastewater infrastructure needed for this site
and for the greater wastewater basin.
The PUD Plan has additional standards and limitations, some more restrictive and some less
restrictive than the UDC. Most provisions are a commitment to standards that ensure
compatibility between the uses and provide clear development expectations as the project
progresses over time.
Staff has determined that the proposed development is consistent with the goals and policies of
the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. It supports the Overall Transportation Plan, Future Land Use Plan,
and Parks Master Plan by providing adequate public facilities for the provided land uses.
Additionally, the development supports the Utility Master Plan by providing extensions and
master plan facilities.
The PUD is consistent with the UDC zoning and PUD approval criteria and supports the City’s
Page 28 of 67
Planning Department Staff Report
The Homestead at Berry Creek
REZ-2016-022 Page 6 of 6
goals for balanced development.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff is recommending approval of the PUD.
Public Comments
No public comments have been received.
Meetings Schedule
February 21, 2017 – Planning and Zoning Commission public hearing
February 28, 2017 – City Council public hearing and ordinance reading
March 28, 2017 – City Council final ordinance reading
Attachments
Exhibit 1 – Location Map
Exhibit 2 – Future Land Use Map
Exhibit 3 – Zoning Map
Exhibit 4 – Aerial Map
Exhibit 5 – PUD plan
Page 29 of 67
§¨¦35
WilliamsDr
Lake w ay Dr
Lakeway D r
Booty'sCrossingRd
ShellRd
S h ell R d
N Austin Ave
¬«130
¬«19 5
¬«19 5
S eren a da D r
")971
Lake w ay Dr
AirportRd
(River/Stream)
REZ-2016-022Exhibit #1
Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only
¯
Location Map
0 0.5 1 1.5Mi
Le ge ndSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
Page 30 of 67
NORT
H
W
E
S
T
B
L
V
D
SERENADADR
B
E
R
R
Y
C
R
E
EKDR
A
I
R
P
O
R
T
R
D
S A N A L O M A D R
§¨¦35
BERRY CREEK DR
Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only
¯
Future Land Use / Overall Transportation Plan
Exhibit #2
REZ-2016 -022
Legend
Thoroughfare
Future Land Use
Institutional
Regional Commercial
Community Commercial
Em ployment Center
Low Density Residential
Mining
Mixed Use Community
Mixed Use Neighborhood Center
Moderate Density Residential
Open Space
Specialty Mixed Use Area
Ag / Rural Residential
Existing Collector
Existing Freeway
Existing Major Arterial
Existing Minor Arterial
Existing Ramp
Proposed Collector
Proposed Freeway
Propsed Frontage Road
Proposed Major Arterial
Proposed Minor Arterial
Proposed Railroad
High Density Residential
0 ¼½¾1Mi
LegendSiteParcelsCity Lim itsGeorgetown ETJ
Page 31 of 67
NORT
H
W
E
S
T
B
L
V
D
SERENADADR
B
E
R
R
Y
C
R
E
EKDR
A
I
R
P
O
R
T
R
D
S A N A L O M A D R
§¨¦35
BERRY CREEK DR
Zoning InformationREZ-2016-022Exhibit #3
Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only
Le ge ndSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ
¯
0 ¼½¾1MiPage 32 of 67
THE HOMESTEAD
ON BERRY CREEK
City of Georgetown, Texas
Planned Unit Development (PUD)
Development Plan
June 22, 2016
Revised: July 28, 2016
Revised: September 21, 2016
Revised: January 11, 2017
Applicant: Trio Development
7811 Ranch Road 2338
Georgetown, Tx 78633
Prepared by: SEC Planning
4201 W. Parmer Lane
Building A, Suite 220
Austin, Tx 78727
Page 33 of 67
Page 1 of 29 Homestead - Planned Unit Development
Exhibit A to PUD Ordinance
Development Plan
Homestead Planned Unit Development (the “PUD”)
A. Purpose and Intent
The boundaries of the PUD consist of 340.5 acres described in Exhibit B (Field Notes) (the
“Property”), attached to the PUD Ordinance. The Project is planned as a mixed use, master
planned community with a variety of residential lot sizes and product types, commercial
and office uses and preserved open space.
The contents of this Development Plan explain and illustrate the overall appearance and
function desired for the Property.
B. Applicability and Base Zoning
The development of the Property shall comply with the version of the Georgetown Unified
Development Code (UDC) in effect at the time of approval, and other applicable provisions
in the City’s Code of Ordinances, except as modified within this Development Plan or the
Exhibits attached to the PUD Ordinance.
The base zoning districts for the Property are:
RS – Residential Single Family
TH - Townhouse
MF-1 – Multi Family
C-3 (General Commercial)
PF – Public Facilities
All development within the Property must comply with this Development Plan. If this
Development Plan does not specifically address a development requirement, the
Georgetown Unified Development Code shall apply. In the event of a conflict between
this Development Plan and the base zoning district, this Development Plan shall control.
C. Concept Plan
Exhibit C attached to the PUD Ordinance for the Property is a Concept Plan for the
Property. Because the Property comprises a significant area and its development will occur
in phases over a number of years, modifications to the Concept Plan may become desirable
due to changes in market conditions or other factors. The Property owner may request
modifications to the Concept Plan.
Page 34 of 67
Page 2 of 29 Homestead - Planned Unit Development
Modifications of the Concept Plan pertaining to (a) roadway and trail alignments; (b)
changes in the density of specific sections or phases shown on the Concept Plan that do not
increase the overall density of development on the Land, and (c) changes of less than twenty
percent (20%) in the size of any section or phase shown on the Concept Plan, shall be
considered “Minor Modifications” over which the City’s Planning Director has final review
and decision-making authority. In addition, the City may request modifications to the
Concept Plan relating to roadway and trail alignments if necessary due to topography,
terrain, floodplains and floodways, alignment with connections to adjoining portions of
roadways, trails, or utilities on adjacent properties, and similar situations, all of which shall
be considered Minor Modifications over which the City’s Planning Director has final
review and decision-making authority.
All other changes to the Concept Plan that are not Minor Modifications shall be considered
“Major Modifications.” Major Modifications to the Concept Plan must be approved as an
amendment to this Development Plan, PUD Ordinance, and Consent Agreement pertaining
to creation of a municipal utility district on the Property by the City Council. After approval
by the City in accordance with these requirements, all Minor Modifications and Major
Modifications to the Concept Plan shall be recorded by the City at the Property owner’s
expense in the Official Records of Williamson County, and thereafter, all references in this
Development Plan to the Concept Plan shall mean and refer to the then most current
approved and recorded Concept Plan.
Minor Modifications to the Concept Plan allowed by this Development Plan shall not be
deemed to be changes to the Project under Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government
Code. All Major Modifications to the Concept Plan shall be deemed to be changes to the
Project under Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code, and the provisions of the
UDC and all other applicable laws and regulations in effect at the time of such Major
Modifications shall apply unless the City agrees otherwise.
Approval of this Development Plan does not constitute plat or site plan approval, and all
development related approvals required by the UDC are still required.
D. Allowable / Prohibited Uses
The residential component of uses on the Property must include a mix of various single
family products, together with a cohesive network of open spaces, parks, greenbelts, water
quality areas, trails, and a resident amenity center. The residential uses within the Property
shall comply with the list of allowed and prohibited uses for RS (Residential Single
Family), TH (Townhouse) and MF-1 (Low Density Multi Family) defined in the
Georgetown UDC, Chapter 5 Zoning Use Regulations.
The non-residential list of allowed and prohibited uses on the property shall comply with
the uses defined for C-3 (General Commercial) in the Georgetown UDC, Chapter 5 Zoning
Use Regulations with the addition of the following uses:
Movie Production
Printing and Publishing
Page 35 of 67
Page 3 of 29 Homestead - Planned Unit Development
Office/Warehouse
Research, Testing and Development Lab
Manufacturing, Processing and Assembly, Limited
Commercial Document Storage
E. Development Standards
The development areas on the Property shall be developed according to the following
standards as well as the standards listed in Table E.1 below.
The following unit count parameters and design standards have been established:
1. Maximum Number of Residential Units:
The residential unit count on the Property shall not exceed 985 units.
Lot Width:
The minimum lot width for single family detached residential shall be 45 feet
In order to ensure product diversity, the following single family detached residential
percentages shall apply to the Property:
A maximum of 25% of the total single family detached lots may have lot
widths less than 50 feet
A minimum of 20% of the total single family detached lots shall have lot
widths of 60 feet or larger
2. Masonry Requirements:
The exterior surface area of all first floor residential elevations shall consist of 100%
brick, stone, stucco. The façades of all second story residential elevations shall be
100% brick, stone, stucco or cementitious fiber planking (exclusive of roofs, eaves,
dormers, soffits, windows, doors, gables, garage doors, decorative trim and
trimwork). All walls must include materials and design characteristics consistent
with those on the front. Lesser quality materials or details for side or rear walls are
prohibited.
The exterior of all buildings on non-residential lots shall be constructed of at least
75% brick, stone, stucco or other masonry products, or architecturally treated tiltwall,
exclusive of roofs, eaves, soffits, windows, doors, gables and frame work.
3. Architectural Requirements:
The following architectural criteria shall apply:
All Single family detached dwellings shall contain a minimum of 1,200 square
Page 36 of 67
Page 4 of 29 Homestead - Planned Unit Development
feet of enclosed living space, exclusive of porches, decks, garages.
All residential homes shall have a minimum roof pitch of 6:12, except porch
coverings or secondary roof features.
Roofs on buildings on Non Residential lots may be of pitched roof design or
flat roof design. Roof materials shall be asphalt, shingles, tiles or slate. Metal
roofs must have a non-reflective finish. Any mechanical equipment placed on
the roof, such as vents, air conditioning equipment, and the like, must be
screened so as to not be visible from the ground floor level of the building.
The front elevation of all homes shall contain wall plane articulation. No elevations
shall be a single wall plane across the entire width of the front elevation. Each front
elevation shall contain a minimum of two of the following elements, to be identified
on the architectural plans submitted for building permit:
A minimum of two wall planes on the front elevation, offset a minimum of 18
inches
Covered front porch or patio with a minimum size of 60 square feet
A side-entry or swing-in garage entry (for garage doors that do not face the
front street)
A garage door recessed from the primary front façade a minimum of four feet
(for garage doors that face the front street)
Enhanced garage door materials (wood, ornamental metal, decorative door,
window inserts and hardware, painted or stained to match house)
Shed roof or trellis (at least 18” deep) above garage door for additional
architectural detail
A combination of at least two roof types (e.g., hip and gable) or two different
roof planes of varying height and/or direction
Two or more masonry finishes to compliment the architectural style of the
home
The addition of one or more dormers on the front elevation to compliment the
architectural style of the home
Page 37 of 67
Page 5 of 29 Homestead - Planned Unit Development
4. Driveways:
Residential driveways on corner lots shall be spaced a minimum of 60 feet from
Collector Level Roadways shown on Exhibit C to the PUD Ordinance and 50 feet
from a local street, both as measured from the back of curb to the center of the
driveway.
5. Walls/Fences:
Any fence that faces a street shall be constructed so that the front portion of the
fencing faces the street. Fences that face a street shall also have a cap and be
stained.
All fences on lots abutting, or adjacent to any greenbelt, critical environmental
feature, or buffer shall be of wrought iron, along the rear property line and along the
side property lines (from the rear property line to the back of the house). All
wrought iron fences shall be six feet in height with pickets no greater than 4 inches
apart and painted bronze or black.
A masonry wall will be provided along Airport Road between any residential
structures and the ultimate right of way for the roadway.
6. Landscaping
Airport Road: After the right of way required for the Airport Road expansion is
defined, an additional area will be provided to expand the right of way as necessary
to allow for walls and landscaping. A minimum 5 foot wide wall and landscape
easement will be incorporated within the expanded right of way for the purpose of
providing area for plantings and walls along Airport Road. The wall and landscape
easement shall be planted with two (2) shade trees, minimum 3 inch caliper and five
(5), five (5) gallon shrubs for every 1,000 square feet of landscape easement area.
Common area landscaping shall be owned and maintained by a community
homeowner’s association.
Tree root barriers shall be provided for trees that are located within a public utility
easement or a landscape area that is less than ten feet in width.
Page 38 of 67
Page 6 of 29 Homestead - Planned Unit Development
RESIDENTIAL
USES Base District
RS
NON
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
District C-3 District MF-1 TH
Lot Width
Minimum 45 ft. 1
50 ft. 50 ft. 22 ft.
Exception: Minimum for Corner Lots 50 ft
Exception: Minimum for Lots with side lot
lines on Road 1 or Road 2 55 feet
Front Setback
Minimum
20 ft.
15 ft house, 20’
Garage 25 ft. 15 ft. 15 ft.
Side Setback
Minimum 5 ft.
10 ft 10 ft 10 ft. (non shared
wall)
Exception: Minimum for side setback
adjacent to a street 10 ft
Exception: Minimum for garage
accessed from a side street 20 ft.
Rear Setback
Minimum 10 ft.
10 ft. 10 ft. 15 ft.
Exception: Minimum for a lot that
backs to the collector roads labeled
Road 1 or Road 2
15 ft
Building Height
(maximum) 35 ft. 45 ft. 35 ft. 35 ft.
Lot Area 5,500 s.f.
(minimum) 5 acres 5 acres 2,000 s.f.
Impervious Cover
Overall Property Maximum 45%
UDC Section
11.02
UDC Section
11.02
UDC Section
11.02
Individual Residential Lot
Up to 60%, provided
that 45% overall
maximum is not
exceeded1.
Table E.1 – Development Standards
1The Final Plat for each phase of development must call out in either a plat note or a table the specific impervious cover maximum
allocated for the lots within the plat.
Setbacks shall be measured from the outside of the exterior surface of the home.
Eaves and overhangs are permitted to encroach within the setbacks a maximum of 18 inches.
Page 39 of 67
Page 7 of 29
F. Parkland/Trails/Open Space/Amenity Center
As illustrated on Exhibit D to the PUD Ordinance, Open Space Summary, the Concept
Plan requires at least 20 acres of public parkland (based on 985 unit cap). The public
parkland acreage illustrated on Exhibit D and the associated public Berry Creek Trail,
will, when dedicated and constructed, fully satisfy the City’s parkland dedication
requirements for the Property. Twenty (20) acres of land, or a portion thereof, along the
Berry Creek frontage shall be dedicated to the City by special warranty deed, along
with public right-of-way, no later than the recording of the first Final Plat for any
portion of the Property containing residential lots. The Berry Creek frontage parkland
and associated trail may be dedicated and constructed in up to three (3) phases, as
illustrated on Exhibit D.
Private Amenities
In addition to the aforementioned public parkland dedication, approximately 47
additional acres of open space area will be maintained on the Property by the
Homeowner’s Association, consisting of private trail corridors, greenbelts, floodplain,
slopes, landscape buffers and drainage areas.
A minimum of one private amenity center for residents of the Property will be provided.
The private amenity center will contain at least two (2) playgrounds. One playground
for ages 2-5 and one for ages 5-12. Additional private amenities may include a,
residents-only swimming pool, pool buildings, dog park and trails. The private amenity
center will be owned and maintained by the community homeowners association.
Internal, private trails shall be a minimum of six (6) feet in width and may be
constructed of concrete or decomposed granite. Private trails will be owned and
maintained by the community homeowner’s association.
Berry Creek Trail (Public)
The Berry Creek Trail shall meet the following specifications:
The trail shall be approximately 6,500 linear feet in length constructed along
the entire length of Berry Creek as it traverses the Property, be ten (10) feet
wide, and be made of concrete. The trail must be located within the dedicated
parkland and/or a public utility easement for the wastewater line which will
parallel Berry Creek in the general location shown on Exhibit D to the PUD
Ordinance.
The developer will provide permanent access easements to the Berry Creek trail
for public access and maintenance at specified trailhead and amenity center
locations.
A minimum of ten (10) public parking spaces, two (2) of which that are
handicap accessible, will be provided at the public trailhead and the private
amenity center, as coordinated with the parks department. Trails leading from
Page 40 of 67
Page 8 of 29
the trailhead and/or private amenity center to the Berry Creek trail shall be
dedicated as public access and shall be a minimum of eight (8) feet in width and
constructed of concrete.
The developer will acquire and convey to the City permanent easements for the
construction of the extension of Berry Creek Trail offsite and across the creek
via a low water crossing to connect with the County trail at Berry Springs Park
and Preserve. The developer will acquire and convey to the City permanent
access easements for trail maintenance. The developer will construct the trail
connection to Berry Springs Park and Preserve with the approval of the first plat
in Parcel 7, as indicated on Exhibit C.
The trail and trailheads within the Property shall be registered with the Texas
Department of Licensing and Regulation (TDLR) and designed and constructed
to meet the requirements of the Texas Accessibility Standards (TAS). If
topographic constraints restrict any area along the creek, the U.S. Forest Service
Outdoor Recreation Accessibility Guidelines (FSORAG) will be followed for
the trail construction.
The trail shall be constructed on the earlier of: (a) Prior to final acceptance of
any lot in Parcels 1, 2 or 7 on Exhibit D to the PUD Ordinance; however the
trail may be completed in up to three (3) phased segments, as illustrated on
Exhibit D. Final acceptance of any lot shall be defined as final acceptance of
the subdivision improvements serving any part of Parcels 1, 2 or 7 shown on
exhibit D. Should fiscal be posted to allow the recordation of the subdivision
plat for one of the above mentioned parcels, the posted fiscal instrument shall
not be released until the trail is complete.
The City will own and maintain the Berry Creek Trail.
All facilities utilized as “credit” toward the City’s parkland dedication requirements
shall be open to the public. All developer installed facilities as well as open space areas
shall be maintained by a Property Owners Association to the same or better standards
as the City’s standards for similar improvements and areas.
G. Street Design
Roadway circulation and right of way classification must be consistent with the
Concept Plan attached as Exhibit C to the PUD Ordinance. Roadway design standards
shall be governed by the Georgetown UDC, Section 12.03, Streets, unless specifically
modified by this Development Plan.
The primary entry to the Property is via a Major Collector from Airport Road (shown
as “Road 1” on Exhibit C to the PUD Ordinance). Road 1 shall be a 88’ minimum right
of way Major Collector with no parking on either side of the road. Road 1 may have
ribbon curbs with open drainage swales or stand up curb, depending on whether the
stormwater is collected in an open swale or an enclosed system. An eight (8) foot
sidewalk will be placed on one side of the road and a six (6) foot sidewalk on the
opposite side. A landscape median with ribbon curb or stand up curb will be provided
Page 41 of 67
Page 9 of 29
to allow for traffic separation and for turn lanes into individual neighborhoods and
commercial uses. See Exhibit F.1 for cross section of “Road 1”.
A Neighborhood Collector (shown as “Road 2” on Exhibit C to the PUD Ordinance) is
centrally located. Road 2 shall be a Neighborhood Collector with a minimum 84 foot
wide right of way or a 60 foot minimum right of way, depending on the presence of a
median. Road 2 may have ribbon curbs with open drainage swales or stand up curb,
depending on whether the stormwater is collected in an open swale or an enclosed
system. Five (5) foot sidewalks will be provided on each side of the Neighborhood
Collector. A landscape median may be provided along the entire roadway or along a
segment of the roadway where it intersects with Airport Road. See Exhibit F.2 for
cross section of the median divided treatment and Exhibit F.3 for the non-median
divided treatment.
“Road 3” as shown on Exhibit C must be stubbed out at the Property line for a future
connection to the tract south of the Property and shall continue to the south property
line. No parking or residential driveways shall be allowed on Road 3. Road 3 shall be
a Neighborhood Collector with a minimum 60 foot wide right of way with 28 feet of
pavement, measured back of curb to back of curb, per Exhibit F.3. Road 3 may have
ribbon curbs with open drainage swales or stand up curb, depending on whether the
stormwater is collected in an open swale or an enclosed system. Five (5) foot sidewalks
will be provided on each side of the Neighborhood Collector. The location of Road 3
shall remain flexible until the time of development of the southernmost parcels to allow
for coordination with any potential development that may occur on the adjacent land to
the south.
Right of way for Road 1, Road 2, and Road 3 shall be dedicated to the City, free and
clear of all liens and encumbrances, at the time of final plat.
Internal Local Streets within the Property shall be designed and constructed having a
50’ wide right of way with 30 foot width of pavement measured from back of curb to
back of curb. Mountable roll curbs shall be used with five (5) foot sidewalks on each
side as indicated on Exhibit F.4. On-street parking shall be allowed on both sides of
the local streets.
Street Connectivity: A minimum of four (4) access points to adjacent properties or
existing or planned roadways shall be provided and shall be in the locations generally
depicted in Exhibit C to the PUD Ordinance. Additionally, at least two (2) of the four
(4) access points must be completed prior to the submission of a final plat application
for a plat having the 31st residential lot on the Property. One of these access points
must be a permanent roadway meeting the standards referenced above; the second of
these access points may be a temporary 26-foot emergency all-weather access drive
until an alternate permanent second access point is constructed.
Block Length: Block length in Parcel 1 where lots will back to Berry Creek may be
up to 3,600 feet or 55 lots. See Exhibit C for location of block length variance.
Page 42 of 67
Page 10 of 29
Remaining interior block lengths may be a maximum of 1,320 feet or 25 lots.
Landscape Islands: Trees and vegetation may be planted in medians in public right-
of-ways. A Property Owners Association must be responsible for landscape
maintenance and irrigation within landscape lots and rights of way. Landscape within
the right-of-way shall require a license agreement with the City. Shade trees are
allowed within a public utility easement and within five (5) feet of water or wastewater
lines.
Page 43 of 67
Page 11 of 29
H. Environmental
Storm Water Reuse Irrigation System Water conservation shall be a key design element of the project. Storm water shall be captured and treated in several on site water quality ponds and held for irrigation reuse within the project. Pond design shall meet TCEQ requirements for water quality within the Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone and the Georgetown Water Quality Ordinance. The captured water will be redistributed throughout the site in what is commonly referred to as a “purple pipe” system, utilizing pumps at the source (ponds) and various forms of irrigation equipment to meet the needs of community common areas, such as road rights-of-way, trail corridors, and private residential yards. The primary source for the irrigation system shall be storm water capture. A supplemental source of water in the event of dry weather shall be from existing wells located within the proposed development owned by the current property owner. The re-use irrigation system shall be owned and maintained by the home owners association up to the re-use meter on each residential lot. Private home owners lots will be maintained by the home owner. The City of Georgetown acknowledges that the privately owned and maintained “purple pipe” irrigation system will be located within portions of publicly owned road right-of-way and agrees to grant easements where necessary to irrigate the common areas within the community. Green Infrastructure The project shall use a blend of traditional and low impact design guidelines. Traditional storm water conveyance systems (underground pipes) shall be used along loaded residential streets. Roadways that are not loaded (such as Major and Neighborhood Collectors) or loaded on one side only, may utilize open swale conveyance or bioswales wherever possible. If swales are utilized, a minimum of 6 inches of freeboard shall be provided. All storm water systems, regardless of traditional or low impact, shall meet City of Georgetown conveyance design requirements of carrying 100-year storm capacity. Where residential lots abut natural drainage areas, vegetative filter strips shall be used for a portion of water quality treatment. All water quality design shall be approved per TCEQ Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone requirements. Vegetative filter strips will be recorded on the plat and shall not be within the 100 year floodplain.
Building Design
The Community structures will achieve a minimum of a three star rating as set forth in
the Austin Energy Green Building Program, regardless of whether the community is
located within the Austin Energy service area. As part of the three star rating, the
following items or their equivalent shall be included:
Texas sourced materials shall be utilized for at least 30% (dollar value) of
Page 44 of 67
Page 12 of 29
project building materials, inclusive of site and infrastructure construction.
Implement integrated pest management plan (IPM) to minimize environmental
impact and use least toxic practices for site and building management.
Reduce indoor water usage by 25% from current baseline averages.
Landscaping
Residential landscaping shall be in accordance with UDC Section 8.03 and the City’s
Water Conservation Ordinance codified in Chapter 13.15 of the City Code of
Ordinances.
The Homestead on Berry Creek will strive to reduce outdoor water usage by 50% from
current baseline averages. Austin Energy Green Building standards will be followed
within the development to meet a minimum of 3 stars. The Austin Energy Green
Building standards scorecard is included as Exhibit G. The Homestead on Berry Creek
will utilize the version of the Austin Energy Green Building standards in place at the
time of development.
Plants should be selected from the booklet titled, Native and Adapted Landscape Plants,
an earthwise guide for Central Texas, 5th Edition, 2013, created by the Texas
Cooperative Extension, Grow Green and the Ladybird Johnson National Wildflower
Center.
I. Signage
Exhibit E to the PUD Ordinance illustrates the location of signage within the Property.
General
These size modifications shall replace the size restrictions described in Chapter 10 of
the Unified Development Code.
Signage shall not be located in the sight-triangle of an intersection.
Subdivision Entry Signs
Primary subdivision entry monument signs shall be located along Airport Road at the
Collector road intersections, as illustrated on Exhibit E to the PUD Ordinance. The
signs shall either be located in a sign easement or be located on a separate lot.
The sign area including the base and sign face shall not exceed 280 square feet, or 8
feet in height and the sign face encompassing only the surface for the sign letters and
logo shall not exceed 120 square feet. Surrounding architectural features such as
towers and walls shall not count against the sign square footage and shall not exceed
25 feet in height.
Page 45 of 67
Page 13 of 29
The signs shall be located a minimum of 20’ from the ultimate right of way of Airport
Road and 10 feet from the adjacent Collector entry road.
A minimum of 1,000 square feet of landscape plant bed shall be provided around the
Subdivision Entry Signs. Plant material should be of a native and/or adapted species.
Plants should be selected from the booklet titled, Native and Adapted Landscape
Plants, an earthwise guide for Central Texas, 5th Edition, 2013, created by the Texas
Cooperative Extension, Grow Green and the Ladybird Johnson National Wildflower
Center. All signage as well as landscaping area shall be privately maintained by
Property Owners Association.
Residential Neighborhood Monument Signs
Neighborhood signs may be located throughout the Property as noted on Exhibit E to
the PUD Ordinance. The signs shall either be located in a sign easement or be located
on a separate platted lot. Neighborhood signs shall not block sight distances nor be
located in a public utility easement or site triangle and shall be setback a minimum of
10 feet from adjacent rights of way. The sign area including the base and sign face
shall not exceed 50 square feet, or 6 feet in height and the sign face encompassing only
the surface for the sign letters and logo shall not exceed 25 square feet.
A minimum of 100 square feet of landscape plant bed shall be provided around each
Residential Neighborhood Monument Sign. Plant material should be of a native and/or
adapted species. Plants should be selected from the booklet titled, Native and Adapted
Landscape Plants, an earthwise guide for Central Texas, 5th Edition, 2013, created by
the Texas Cooperative Extension, Grow Green and the Ladybird Johnson National
Wildflower Center. All signage as well as landscaping area shall be privately
maintained by a Property Owners Association.
J. Miscellaneous Provisions
Amendments: Except as otherwise provided herein, Amendments to this PUD shall
follow the amendment process outlined in the UDC.
Exhibits. All exhibits described herein and attached to the PUD Ordinance are fully
incorporated into this Development Plan by this reference for all purposes.
Page 46 of 67
Page 14 of 29
EXHIBIT B - FIELD NOTES
Page 47 of 67
Page 15 of 29
Page 48 of 67
Page 16 of 29
Page 49 of 67
Page 17 of 29
Page 50 of 67
Page 18 of 29
EXHIBIT C – CONCEPT PLAN
Page 51 of 67
Page 19 of 29
EXHIBIT D – PARK PLAN
Page 52 of 67
Page 20 of 29
EXHIBIT E – SIGN PLAN
Page 53 of 67
Page 21 of 29
EXHIBIT F.1 – ROAD 1
Page 54 of 67
Page 22 of 29
EXHIBIT F.2 – ROAD 2 WITH MEDIAN
Page 55 of 67
Page 23 of 29
EXHIBIT F.3 – ROAD 2 and ROAD 3 WITHOUT MEDIAN
Page 56 of 67
Page 24 of 29
EXHIBIT F.4 – INTERNAL STREETS
Page 57 of 67
Page 25 of 29
EXHIBIT G – AUSTIN ENERGY GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS
Page 58 of 67
Page 26 of 29
Page 59 of 67
Page 27 of 29
Page 60 of 67
Page 28 of 29
Page 61 of 67
Page 29 of 29
Page 62 of 67
N IH 35 FWY SB
N IH 35 FWY NB
N IH 35 SB
CR 150
B R A N G U S R D
M
A
R
K
ET S
T
N IH 35 NB
D E ER TR L
A
I
R
P
O
R
T
R
D
ENTR 265 NB
C A V U R D
ENTR 266 SB
S
H 130 N
B
EXIT 266 NB
SH130TOLLSB
S
H
130
S
B
CIE L O DR
S
H
1
3
0
T
O
L
L
N
B
C H A M P I O N S D R
S
H
1
9
5
E
B
VORTAC LN
L
U
N
A
T
R
L
S
H 1
9
5
W
B
L O G A N R A N C H R D
BERRYCREE K D R
S
H
1
9
5
R
A
M
P
L A Q UIN T A DR
TONKOWA
TRL
S E R E N A D A DR
E C O R DOBACIR
SIER R A DR
S E G U N D O D R
AERODR
T O L E D O TRL
H A Z E L T I N E DR
SANAL O M A DR
INDIAN MOUND RD
L O G A N R D OAKTRE E D R
D E L P R A D O L N
P A L O D U R O C T
SH 195
C
A
D
I
Z
C
T
CAVU RD
N IH 35 SB
S I E R R A D R
I N D I A N M O U N D R D
CIELO DR
SAN A L O M A DR
B R A N GUS R D
S
H
1
9
5
W
B
N IH 35 NB
N IH 35 NB
N IH 35 NB
N IH 35 NB
N IH 35 FWY NB
N IH 35 FWY SB
SERENADADR
N IH 35 SB
N IH 35 SB
N IH 35 SB
C A V U R D
N IH 35 NB
NIH35SB
CHA M P I O N S D R
N IH 35 NB
ENTR 266 SB
L
U
N
A
T
R
L
C H A M P I O N S D R
B
R
A
N
GUSRD
N IH 35 NB
Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only
¯
Aerial
REZ-2016-022 Le ge ndSiteCity Limits
0 0.25 0.5Mi
Page 63 of 67
City of Georgetown, Texas
Planning and Zoning
February 21, 2017
SUBJECT:
Presentatio n and dis c us sion of the CAMPO/City o f Georgetown Williams Drive Study – Jordan Maddox,
AICP, Princ ipal Planner, Andreina Dávila-Quintero, P ro ject Co o rd inato r, and Nathaniel Waggoner, AICP,
PMP, Trans portation Analyst
ITEM SUMMARY:
Since the stud y initiated in July 2016, the pro jec t team has c o mp iled and analyzed technic al data, hosted
s everal p ublic meetings with numero us s takeho ld ers , d eveloped an Exis ting C o nditio ns rep o rt, and began
d eveloping co nc ep tual designs to ad d res s the is s ues identified in the initial s tage o f the p ro ject. Bas ed on
the Existing Cond itions report and pub lic inp ut rec eived to d ate, the p ro ject team has id entified the
fo llo wing p rimary is s ues :
· Traffic congestio n/circ ulatio n
· Traffic o p erations and safety
· R ed evelopment and reinves tment barriers
· Gateway aesthetic enhanc ements
· P ed es trian/bic yc le improvements
The attached Exhibit A go es into ad d itional d etail id entifying the c auses o f eac h of the primary issues and
s o me potential s o lutio ns that will b e analyzed bas ed o n case s tud y, tec hnical res earc h and p ro fes s io nal
p ractice.
The p urpose of this presentatio n is to provide to P&Z an update on the Williams Drive Study, present the
p rimary is s ues identified as well as general so lutio ns , and seek c o nc urrence on projec t ap p ro ach. The next
s tep inc ludes refining the recommend ations o f the Concept P lan. The Co nc ept P lan and p o s s ib le
imp lementatio n s trategies will b e reviewed by the p ublic in Marc h. Following p ublic review and comment,
s taff will p res ent P&Z with a draft of the final rep o rt which includ es implementation s trategies .
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
.
SUBMITTED BY:
Jordan Maddo x, AIC P, P rinc ip al P lanner
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Williams Drive Is s ues and Pos s ible Solutions Backup Material
Page 64 of 67
Exhibit A
Page A1 of A3
Williams Drive Study
Primary Issues and Possible Solutions
STUDY GOALS
Enhance multimodal movement and transportation operations
Support corridor-wide and regional sustainable growth
Protect and enhance quality of life
Encourage development that creates a variety of context sensitive mixed-use services
that are accessible to neighborhoods
PRIMARY ISSUES
Traffic Congestion/Circulation
Traffic Operations and Safety
Redevelopment and Reinvestment Barriers
Gateway Aesthetic Enhancements
Pedestrian/Bicycle Improvements
ISSUE IDENTIFICATION, CAUSES AND POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS
Traffic Congestion/Circulation
• 29,000 vehicles use the corridor per day – and counting
• 7,000 study area residents commute elsewhere (use Williams to leave the area)
• 95% study area residents have at least one car. 80% drive alone
• Lack of alternative routes to I-35 and downtown
Possible Solutions
• Develop alternate routes and encourage connectivity
• Recognize the importance of land use decisions on traffic volume, street design
and access management to improve circulation and traffic flow
• Consider adding additional traffic capacity in the future
• Encourage alternative transportation modes
• Enhance the driving experience through aesthetic improvements such as street
trees, building design, and more efficient speed/movement through the corridor
• Create street sections that work better within the existing context of right-of-way
and existing plus desired land use design
Traffic Operations and Safety
• 150+ curb cuts (and growing) and unimpeded turning movements to driveways
• Lack of alternative streets and connectivity increases travel times for all modes
and emergency service response
Page 65 of 67
Exhibit A
Page A2 of A3
• Intersection volume creates challenges turning movements, and lack of
alternatives
• Pedestrian and bicycle safety concerns in a vehicle-dominant corridor
• Continuous two-way center turn lanes cause traffic conflicts
Possible Solutions
• Establish a unified signal management plan with real time reporting/managing
• Access management plan with medians, driveway consolidation, dedicated turn
lanes
• Improve turning movements and remove conflicts through street design
• Block standards for street/driveway connection to facilitate connectivity
• Consider street design that coincides with the land use pattern, right-of-way
constraints
• Account for speeds, non-vehicular modes, and necessary turning movements
when considering short and long-term street design
Redevelopment and Reinvestment Barriers
• Redevelopment of older parcels challenging due to new site development
requirements – stormwater, parking, impervious cover, setbacks; street right-of-
way section does not account for adjacent, existing development (site constraints)
• Zoning districts and land uses are not customized for the optimization of the
corridor (i.e. zoning standards are applied consistently city-wide)
• Fragmented ownership and small parcels
• Limited variety of residential product options along Williams Drive
• Older properties in Centers area face challenges to reinvestment
Possible Solutions
• Create a development strategy for the corridor that eschews the “one-size-fits-
all” approach
• Recruit primary retailers identified in Retail and Recruitment Strategy
• Develop financing mechanisms to overcome capital intensive redevelopment
barriers
• Partner with owners/potential developers of catalytic sites
• Consider regional approach to stormwater, parking, impervious cover
• Adopt flexible zoning codes acknowledging site redevelopment constraints
• Explore zoning code adjustments where more intense development is most
desired, such as the Centers area additional density, mixed-use, and destination
environment
Aesthetic Enhancements
• Older developments have been constructed without zoning codes or have
evolved through iterations of codes, leading to visual inconsistencies and aging
of sites
Page 66 of 67
Exhibit A
Page A3 of A3
• Landscaping, signage, parking lots front yard/gateway treatments lacking or
unsightly
Possible Solutions
• Consider new Gateway design standards to focus on specific character of the
corridor
• Adjust non-conforming site requirements to ensure incremental improvements
and upgrades as owners invest in buildings
• Consider zoning solutions for older properties to offer flexibility for
redevelopment
Pedestrian/Bicycle Improvements
• Sidewalks are not continuous nor comfortable for pedestrians due to location
and width of sidewalk
• Dedicated bicycle paths and lanes are non-existent
• Existing and new driveways, speeds and building/land use design are not
conducive to non-vehicular modes of transport
Possible Solutions
• Implement the Sidewalk Master Plan through CIP and other mechanisms
• Consider regulatory and incentive program for the construction of sidewalks
• Consider bike improvements such as alternative routes, connections to regional
trails and neighborhood streets, dedicated lanes and shared use-paths where
appropriate
Page 67 of 67