Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda_HARC_06.27.2019Notice of Meeting for the Historic and Architectural Rev iew Commission of the City of Georgetown June 27, 2019 at 6:00 P M at City Council Chambers, 510 W. 9th St., Georgetown, Texas 78626 T he C ity of G eorgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If you require as s is tance in partic ipating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the ADA, reas onable as s is tance, adaptations , or ac commodations will be provided upon request. P leas e c ontact the C ity S ec retary's O ffic e, at leas t three (3) days prior to the sc heduled meeting date, at (512) 930-3652 or C ity Hall at 808 Martin Luther King Jr. S treet, G eorgetown, T X 78626 for additional information; T T Y users route through R elay Texas at 711. The H i stor ic and A rc hi tec tur al R evie w C ommi ssion, appointe d by the M ayor and the C ity C ounci l, is re sponsible for hear ing and taki ng final ac tion on applic ations, by issuing C er tific ates of A ppr opr i ate ne ss base d upon the C ity Counc il adopte d Downtown D esign Guidelines and Unifie d De ve lopme nt Code. Welcome and M e eting P r oce dure s: · S taff P re se ntation · A pplicant P re se ntation (L imite d to te n minute s unless stated othe rwise by the Commission.) · Q ue stions fr om Commission to S taff and Applic ant · C omments from C itize ns * · A pplicant R esponse · C ommission De libe rative P roc ess · C ommission A ction * Those who speak must turn in a speaker for m, locate d at the back of the r oom, to the re cor di ng sec re tary before the ite m the y wi sh to addre ss be gins. E ach speaker wi ll be pe r mitte d to addre ss the C ommissi on one ti me onl y for a maximum of thre e minute s. L egislativ e Regular Agenda A P ublic Hearing and possible ac tion o n a req uest fo r a C ertificate o f Ap p ro p riatenes s fo r a R esidential Addition and Alteratio n at the p ro p erty loc ated a 1011 S . C o llege S treet, bearing the legal desc rip tion of Dimmit Addition, BLO C K 86 (P T S ), AC R ES 0.27, (2019-25-C O A) - C helsea Irby, S enior P lanner B Updates , C ommis s ioner questions and comments. S ofia Nels on, P lanning Director Adjournment Ce rtificate of Posting Page 1 of 52 I, R obyn Densmore, C ity S ecretary for the C ity of G eorgetown, Texas, do hereby c ertify that this Notic e of Meeting was posted at C ity Hall, 808 Martin Luther King Jr. S treet, G eorgetown, T X 78626, a plac e readily acc es s ible to the general public as required by law, on the _____ day of _________________, 2019, at __________, and remained s o posted for at leas t 72 c ontinuous hours prec eding the s cheduled time of said meeting. __________________________________ R obyn Dens more, C ity S ec retary Page 2 of 52 City of Georgetown, Texas Historic and Architectural Review June 27, 2019 S UB J E C T: P ublic Hearing and possible ac tion on a reques t for a C ertificate of Appropriateness for a R esidential Addition and Alteration at the p ro p erty loc ated a 1011 S . C ollege S treet, b earing the legal desc rip tion of Dimmit Addition, BLO C K 86 (P T S ), AC R ES 0.27, (2019-25-C O A) - C hels ea Irby, S enior P lanner IT E M S UMMARY: Overview of Applicant's Request: T he applic ant is propos ing a remodel and three additions . T he sc ope of works includes replac ement of roof and windows , removal of a s treet-facing porch ½ wall, demolition of a non-historic addition and the demolition of a non-his toric garage. T he following lis t s pecifies the spec ific work proposed by the applicant. P ortions of the request are reviewed by staff and HAR C per UDC 3.13.010, inc luding: HAR C : - S treet-fac ing wall removal (masonry porch ½ wall) - R emoval and replac ement of windows - S treet-fac ing addition (garage and studio) S taff R eview: - Demolition of rear addition (non-his toric al) - Non-s treet fac ing addition (non-historical) Public Comments: S taff has not rec eived any public comments. Findings: S taff find s that the p ro p o s ed replac ement o f all wind o ws and remo val o f the mas onry p o rch ½ wall meet the Do wntown and O ld Town Des ign G uid elines . T he materials p ro p o s ed fo r the rep lacement o f the windows are similar materials, whic h is allowed by the UDC for lo w and med ium p rio rity s truc tures . T he des ign respec ts the histo ric integrity o f the exis ting struc ture and does no t have a signific ant vis ual impac t on the struc ture. S taff recommend s approval of the street-fac ing ½ wall remo val, the rep lacement of all windows and the addition of two s treet facing fac ades at the rear of the property.T he c reation of two ( 2) new s treet fac ing facades are c ompatible in s cale, materials , and character with the main b uilding and s urrounding properties in the his toric overlay dis tric t. F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: None. T he applicant has paid all required fees . S UB MIT T E D B Y: C helsea Irby, S enior P lanner AT TAC H ME N T S: Description Type Exhibit 1 - Location Map Backup Material Page 3 of 52 Exhibit 2 - Letter of Intent Backup Material Exhibit 3 - Plans and Renderings Exhibit Exhibit 4 - Materials Backup Material Exhibit 5 - His toric Resource Survey Backup Material Staff Report Exhibit Page 4 of 52 ELM ST ASH S T PINE ST E 13TH ST MA P LE S T S M AIN S T E UNIV E RS IT Y AV E E 8TH S T S MYRTLE ST S CHUR CH ST E 7TH S T S CO LLE G E S T WALNUT ST E 11TH S T E 10TH S T E 14TH ST OLIVE ST LAURE L ST SO U L E D R W E S L E Y A N D R E 9 T H S T MCKENZIE DR E 9TH 1/2 ST W R U T E R S V I L L E D R E 8 T H S T E 1 4 T H S T E 14TH S T E 11TH ST E 10TH ST E 9TH ST E 9 T H S T 2019-25-COAExhibit #1 Coordinate System: Texas State Plane/Central Zone/NAD 83/US FeetCartographic Data For General Planning Purposes Only ¯ Location Map LegendSiteParcelsCity LimitsGeorgetown ETJ 0 250 500Fee t Page 5 of 52 City of Georgetown Planning and Development Services/HARC Georgetown, TX 78626 HARC Submission for CoA Project Number: 2019-25-COA The Smith Residence Remodel and Addition 1011 South College Street Georgetown, TX 78626 June 4, 2019 The Project Scope Summary: This application is for a CoA relating to the remodeling and addition to the existing structure at 1011 South College Street. The style of the original home is traditional vernacular with some Victorian elements. The home is currently classified as Medium Priority in the Historic Resources Survey. In the 1984 Survey, it was classified as Low Priority. The residence was estimated to be constructed in about 1900 (also according the Historic Resource Survey). The existing masonry porch ½ wall will be removed between the two middle columns. This wall is not original to the house. We have observed this to be the case due to cracking in the stucco and by the fact that the original columns bisect the walls. The wall was constructed with stacked (infill type) rocks and stucco was applied to the surface. The south and east windows are of various styles making it difficult to confirm if they are original to the structure and truly historic in nature. The windows on the North and West side of the house are degraded single pane windows, making it cost prohibitive to bring them up to current Energy Code compliance. Most are leaking air or water, frames are partially rotted, sashes are inoperable and generally energy inefficient. They are inconsistent in window size and detailing and detract from the original style of the structure. All windows will be replaced to bring more continuity to the style of the home. All new and replacement windows will be Andersen composite fiberglass (100 Series). The lite patterns (3 over 1) and configuration will reflect the original architectural style of the home. Page 6 of 52 There is currently an existing addition to the rear of the home that is not historic in nature and has a failing foundation. This earlier addition will be razed and replaced with a new addition of similar size and form. The roof of the existing structure is currently comprised of composite shingles. New roofing material for the main structure will be composition shingles. The original roof is a conglomeration of various pitches. This is due to the various additions that have been made to the original structure. Some of the older additions were porches that were closed in to provide more living space to the various owners. As a result, there are variating ceiling heights throughout the house. The roofs on the North and South sides of the house (toward the rear of the structure) will be razed and reconstructed in the same style in order to provide a consistent ceiling height inside the home. The wood siding of the existing structure will be patched and repaired with new wood material to match as necessary. All siding where the addition abuts to the original structure will be horizontal lap Hardi-Siding with a profile similar to that of the original structure to create a point of distinction. The overall style of this house will remain the same and will be rounded out with the addition of architectural details appropriate with the overall style. We appreciate the opportunity to present this project to HARC. Sincerely, J. Bryant Boyd, AIA Page 7 of 52 Planning Department 406 W. 8th St. Georgetown, TX  78626 512-930-3575 The following information is required to resubmit an application with changes and corrections based on staff review comments. A resubmittal fee of $250 will be charged for each submittal after the third submittal, for each separate application type, or for any resubmittals received more than 45 calendar days after the City’s comments were provided. Please note that per Unified Development Code Section 3.02.060, Expiration of Application, an accepted application for which there has been no action taken by an applicant for a period of 180 calendar days or more from the date of last action shall be determined to be dormant and processed as withdrawn by the applicant, causing the file to be closed. A 30-day notification letter will be send to the Applicant on record prior to closing an application due to lack of inactivity. The entire resubmittal packet must be submitted through the online Customer Portal located at mygovernmentonline.org.  This allows our office to manage, track, and coordinate the review timeline with all departmental staff reviewers.  The resubmittal packet shall contain the set of files shown in bold below for each single project.  Only submit requested documents do not resubmit files our office sent you and please use the appropriate file name in order to facilitate the review of your project:  ¨  Application Resubmittal Form.pdf - Provided to the applicant by the Case Manager. ¨  Response to Staff Comments.pdf - Please include a written and/or graphical explanation of how staff comments have been addressed. This includes a response to each comment made on each Plan Set and a cover letter.  Both the marked Plan Set and cover letter must be merged into one PDF file. ¨  Plan Review.pdf or Development Plan.pdf (depending on checklist) – The entire set of plans including the revised documents shall be combined and merged together into one PDF file (please do not place in separate folders). ¨  If additional supporting documents are required, please label each additional file with the appropriate name of the document(s) or set of plans (i.e. Drainage Study.pdf, Drainage Report.pdf, Waterline Easements.pdf, Waste Waterline Easements. pdf, Exhibits.pdf).  Individual files will not be accepted. o    For Floodplain and Drainage Analysis – All HEC RAS and HEC HMS files must be zipped together into one zip file named Floodplain.zip. o   For Synchro Files – All synchro files must be zipped together into one zip file named Synchro Files.zip. o   Electric Analysis Files - files must be zipped together into one zip file named Electric Analysis.zip. Please do not add project names, dates, acronyms, special characters, version numbers or prefix numbers to the file names.  Staff will manage the different versions for the applicant and use the most recent version submitted when the City approves plats and plans.  Please remember that all sheets and supporting information must be flattened/merged together into each set of files as identified on the checklist.  All pages must be oriented in the same direction (not sideways). Files that do not follow the proper naming scheme and format will be rejected and require resubmittal before they can be distributed to staff for review. For questions or assistance with MyGovernmentOnline, please contact customer service at 1-866-957-3764. Project Number (required for resubmission):2019-25-COA Application Resubmittal Form (Required for Application Submittal) Resubmittal  Checklist Requirements UDC Development Manual                                                          Georgetown, Texas                                Application Resubmittal Form Revised: June 27, 2018                                                         www.georgetown.org                                                                    Page 1 of 1 Page 8 of 52 City of Georgetown Planning and Development Services/HARC Georgetown, TX 78626 HARC Submission for CoA Project Number: 2019-25-COA The Smith Residence Remodel and Addition 1011 South College Street Georgetown, TX 78626 June 4, 2019 The Project Scope Summary: This application is for a CoA relating to the remodeling and addition to the existing structure at 1011 South College Street. The style of the original home is traditional vernacular with some Victorian elements. The home is currently classified as Medium Priority in the Historic Resources Survey. In the 1984 Survey, it was classified as Low Priority. The residence was estimated to be constructed in about 1900 (also according the Historic Resource Survey). The existing masonry porch ½ wall will be removed between the two middle columns. This wall is not original to the house. We have observed this to be the case due to cracking in the stucco and by the fact that the original columns bisect the walls. The wall was constructed with stacked (infill type) rocks and stucco was applied to the surface. The south and east windows are of various styles making it difficult to confirm if they are original to the structure and truly historic in nature. The windows on the North and West side of the house are degraded single pane windows, making it cost prohibitive to bring them up to current Energy Code compliance. Most are leaking air or water, frames are partially rotted, sashes are inoperable and generally energy inefficient. They are inconsistent in window size and detailing and detract from the original style of the structure. All windows will be replaced to bring more continuity to the style of the home. All new and replacement windows will be Andersen composite fiberglass (100 Series). The lite patterns (3 over 1) and configuration will reflect the original architectural style of the home. Page 9 of 52 There is currently an existing addition to the rear of the home that is not historic in nature and has a failing foundation. This earlier addition will be razed and replaced with a new addition of similar size and form. The roof of the existing structure is currently comprised of composite shingles. New roofing material for the main structure will be composition shingles. The original roof is a conglomeration of various pitches. This is due to the various additions that have been made to the original structure. Some of the older additions were porches that were closed in to provide more living space to the various owners. As a result, there are variating ceiling heights throughout the house. The roofs on the North and South sides of the house (toward the rear of the structure) will be razed and reconstructed in the same style in order to provide a consistent ceiling height inside the home. The wood siding of the existing structure will be patched and repaired with new wood material to match as necessary. All siding where the addition abuts to the original structure will be horizontal lap Hardi-Siding with a profile similar to that of the original structure to create a point of distinction. The overall style of this house will remain the same and will be rounded out with the addition of architectural details appropriate with the overall style. We appreciate the opportunity to present this project to HARC. Sincerely, J. Bryant Boyd, AIA Page 10 of 52 Page 11 of 52 A Job No. Date: Drn By:Revisions:J. Bryant Boyd AIA Georgetown, Texas Telephone 512 930.1686 Facsimile 512 863.7794 jbboyd@jbryantboyd.com www.jbryantboyd.com The Smith Residence Proposed Alterations and Remodel . 1011 S College Street Georgetown, TX 78686 PM 06.03.2019 18026 Exhibit: Page 12 of 52 B Job No. Date: Drn By:Revisions:J. Bryant Boyd AIA Georgetown, Texas Telephone 512 930.1686 Facsimile 512 863.7794 jbboyd@jbryantboyd.com www.jbryantboyd.com The Smith Residence Proposed Alterations and Remodel . 1011 S College Street Georgetown, TX 78686 PM 06.03.2019 18026 Exhibit: Page 13 of 52 Job No. Date: Drn By:Revisions:J. Bryant Boyd AIA Georgetown, Texas Telephone 512 930.1686 Facsimile 512 863.7794 jbboyd@jbryantboyd.com www.jbryantboyd.com The Smith Residence Proposed Alterations and Remodel . 1011 S College Street Georgetown, TX 78686 PM 06.03.2019 18026 CExhibit: Page 14 of 52 Job No. Date: Drn By:Revisions:J. Bryant Boyd AIA Georgetown, Texas Telephone 512 930.1686 Facsimile 512 863.7794 jbboyd@jbryantboyd.com www.jbryantboyd.com The Smith Residence Proposed Alterations and Remodel . 1011 S College Street Georgetown, TX 78686 PM 06.03.2019 18026 DExhibit: Page 15 of 52 E Job No. Date: Drn By:Revisions:J. Bryant Boyd AIA Georgetown, Texas Telephone 512 930.1686 Facsimile 512 863.7794 jbboyd@jbryantboyd.com www.jbryantboyd.com The Smith Residence Proposed Alterations and Remodel . 1011 S College Street Georgetown, TX 78686 PM 06.03.2019 18026 Exhibit: Page 16 of 52 F Job No. Date: Drn By:Revisions:J. Bryant Boyd AIA Georgetown, Texas Telephone 512 930.1686 Facsimile 512 863.7794 jbboyd@jbryantboyd.com www.jbryantboyd.com The Smith Residence Proposed Alterations and Remodel . 1011 S College Street Georgetown, TX 78686 PM 06.03.2019 18026 Exhibit: Page 17 of 52 G Job No. Date: Drn By:Revisions:J. Bryant Boyd AIA Georgetown, Texas Telephone 512 930.1686 Facsimile 512 863.7794 jbboyd@jbryantboyd.com www.jbryantboyd.com The Smith Residence Proposed Alterations and Remodel . 1011 S College Street Georgetown, TX 78686 PM 06.03.2019 18026 Exhibit: Page 18 of 52 H Job No. Date: Drn By:Revisions:J. Bryant Boyd AIA Georgetown, Texas Telephone 512 930.1686 Facsimile 512 863.7794 jbboyd@jbryantboyd.com www.jbryantboyd.com The Smith Residence Proposed Alterations and Remodel . 1011 S College Street Georgetown, TX 78686 PM 06.03.2019 18026 Exhibit: Page 19 of 52 · · · · Job No. Date: Drn By:Revisions:J. Bryant Boyd AIA Georgetown, Texas Telephone 512 930.1686 Facsimile 512 863.7794 jbboyd@jbryantboyd.com www.jbryantboyd.com The Smith Residence Proposed Alterations and Remodel . 1011 S College Street Georgetown, TX 78686 PM 06.03.2019 18026 A1 Page 20 of 52 Job No. Date: Drn By:Revisions:J. Bryant Boyd AIA Georgetown, Texas Telephone 512 930.1686 Facsimile 512 863.7794 jbboyd@jbryantboyd.com www.jbryantboyd.com The Smith Residence Proposed Alterations and Remodel . 1011 S College Street Georgetown, TX 78686 PM 06.03.2019 18026 A2 Page 21 of 52 Job No. Date: Drn By:Revisions:J. Bryant Boyd AIA Georgetown, Texas Telephone 512 930.1686 Facsimile 512 863.7794 jbboyd@jbryantboyd.com www.jbryantboyd.com The Smith Residence Proposed Alterations and Remodel . 1011 S College Street Georgetown, TX 78686 PM 06.03.2019 18026 A3 Page 22 of 52 A4 Job No. Date: Drn By:Revisions:J. Bryant Boyd AIA Georgetown, Texas Telephone 512 930.1686 Facsimile 512 863.7794 jbboyd@jbryantboyd.com www.jbryantboyd.com The Smith Residence Proposed Alterations and Remodel . 1011 S College Street Georgetown, TX 78686 PM 06.03.2019 18026 Page 23 of 52 36 " RE F . MICR. ABV. D W SHOWER 5'0" X 3'8" LA V . W.C. 2S&2R SI N K WOOD PERGOLA ABOVE 8" X 8" WOOD POST 8" X 8" WOOD POST 8" X 8" WOOD POST 4S SINK UC REF. Job No. Date: Drn By:Revisions:J. Bryant Boyd AIA Georgetown, Texas Telephone 512 930.1686 Facsimile 512 863.7794 jbboyd@jbryantboyd.com www.jbryantboyd.com The Smith Residence Proposed Alterations and Remodel . 1011 S College Street Georgetown, TX 78686 PM 06.03.2019 18026 A5 Page 24 of 52 Job No. Date: Drn By:Revisions:J. Bryant Boyd AIA Georgetown, Texas Telephone 512 930.1686 Facsimile 512 863.7794 jbboyd@jbryantboyd.com www.jbryantboyd.com The Smith Residence Proposed Alterations and Remodel . 1011 S College Street Georgetown, TX 78686 PM 06.03.2019 18026 A6 Page 25 of 52 FIRST FLOOR 0' - 0" TOP OF PLATE (GUEST HOUSE) 9' - 1 1/8" ROOF 15' - 9 1/2" FOUNDATION -1' - 0" TOP OF PLATE (GARAGE) 8' - 1 1/8"E E E 8" X 8" WOOD POST 12 : 1 2 12 : 1 2 COMP. SHINGLE ROOFING CALPBOARD SIDING FIRST FLOOR 0' - 0" TOP OF PLATE (GUEST HOUSE) 9' - 1 1/8" ROOF 15' - 9 1/2" FOUNDATION -1' - 0" TOP OF PLATE (GARAGE) 8' - 1 1/8" CLAPBOARD SIDING BOARD & BATT SIDING BOARD & BATT SIDING CLAPBOARD SIDING 8"X12" WOOD BEAM 6"X8" WOOD BEAM 8" X 8" WOOD POST 8" X 8" WOOD POST 4: 1 2 4: 1 2 4: 1 2 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 CLAPBOARD SIDING FIRST FLOOR 0' - 0" TOP OF PLATE (GUEST HOUSE) 9' - 1 1/8" ROOF 15' - 9 1/2" FOUNDATION -1' - 0" C C D CLAPBOARD SIDING 12 : 1 2 COMP. SHINGLE ROOFING FIRST FLOOR 0' - 0" TOP OF PLATE (GUEST HOUSE) 9' - 1 1/8" ROOF 15' - 9 1/2" FOUNDATION -1' - 0" TOP OF PLATE (GARAGE) 8' - 1 1/8" CLAPBORAD SIDING E E E E 4: 1 2 4: 1 2 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 BOARD & BATT SIDING CLAPBORAD SIDING CLAPBORAD SIDING 8"X12" WOOD BEAM 6"X8" WOOD BEAM 8" X 8" WOOD POST 8" X 8" WOOD POST A7 Job No. Date: Drn By:Revisions:J. Bryant Boyd AIA Georgetown, Texas Telephone 512 930.1686 Facsimile 512 863.7794 jbboyd@jbryantboyd.com www.jbryantboyd.com The Smith Residence Proposed Alterations and Remodel . 1011 S College Street Georgetown, TX 78686 PM 06.03.2019 18026 Page 26 of 52 Job No. Date: Drn By:Revisions:J. Bryant Boyd AIA Georgetown, Texas Telephone 512 930.1686 Facsimile 512 863.7794 jbboyd@jbryantboyd.com www.jbryantboyd.com The Smith Residence Proposed Alterations and Remodel . 1011 S College Street Georgetown, TX 78686 PM 06.03.2019 18026 A8 Page 27 of 52 A9 Job No. Date: Drn By:Revisions:J. Bryant Boyd AIA Georgetown, Texas Telephone 512 930.1686 Facsimile 512 863.7794 jbboyd@jbryantboyd.com www.jbryantboyd.com The Smith Residence Proposed Alterations and Remodel . 1011 S College Street Georgetown, TX 78686 PM 06.03.2019 18026 Page 28 of 52 SINGLE-HUNG WINDOWS 100 SERIES DURABLE • Virtually maintenance-free • Rigorously tested to deliver years* of smooth, reliable operation • Fibrex material construction provides long-lasting* performance • Durable, low-maintenance finish won’t fade, flake, blister or peel* • Fibrex material is twice as strong as vinyl Andersen® 100 Series single-hung windows allow ventilation through a single operable lower sash that slides up and down. Classic rectangular shapes are available, or use an arched top for added elegance. Made with our revolutionary Fibrex® composite material, 100 Series products are durable, environmentally smart and energy efficient. 100 Series products are available in deep, rich colors that complement virtually any architectural style. For added style, we offer a wide range of grille patterns and patterned glass options. ENERGY EFFICIENT • Weather-resistant construction for greater comfort and energy efficiency • Weatherstripping is designed to seal out drafts, wind and water • Variety of Low-E glass options are available to help control heating and cooling costs in any climate • Many 100 Series single-hung windows have options that make them ENERGY STAR® v. 6.0 certified throughout the U.S. BEAUTIFUL • Clean, attractive corner seams • Six exterior color options • Attractive matte finish interiors available in four colors • Add style with grilles or patterned glass Dark BronzeWhiteSandtoneTerratoneCocoa Bean Black EXTERIOR COLORS *Visit andersenwindows.com/warranty for details. “ENERGY STAR” is a registered trademark of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Page 29 of 52 For more information, visit andersenwindows.com/100series Fibrex® material combines the strength and durability of wood with the low-maintenance of vinyl. The wood fibers are reclaimed from our own factories, which makes this product sustainable and environmentally responsible. 100 SERIES SINGLE-HUNG WINDOWS HARDWARE FRAME OPTIONS 1-3/8" flange setback, 1" flange setback with stucco key or replacement configuration. INTERIOR OPTIONS HIGH-PERFORMANCE GLASS OPTIONS • Low-E glass • Low-E glass with HeatLock® technology • Low-E SmartSun™ glass • Low-E SmartSun glass with HeatLock technology Tempered glass and other glass options are available. Contact your Andersen dealer. PATTERNED GLASS Ideal for letting light into the home while obscuring vision. Available in four attractive patterns. ADDITIONAL FEATURES • Sash lock engages automatically when operable sash is closed • Operable sash has a meeting stile cover with a unique raised profile design, allowing the sash to be opened and closed easily ReedObscure FernCascade Colonial PrairieTall Fractional *Dark Bronze and Black interiors are only available with Dark Bronze and Black exteriors respectively. Printing limitations prevent exact color and finish duplication. See your Andersen dealer for actual finish samples. “Andersen” and all other marks where denoted are trademarks of Andersen Corporation. ©2017 Andersen Corporation. All rights reserved. SS_015 02/17 Optional lift handle matches the window’s interior. Single-hung windows feature hardware that automatically locks when windows are closed. Hardware color matches the window’s interior. Dark Bronze* Dark Bronze Black*White Sandtone New metal Slim Line hardware is available in White, Sandtone, Dark Bronze, Black, Satin Nickel and Antique Brass. GRILLES Choose from the following grille options: • Finelight™ grilles-between- the-glass • Finelight with exterior grilles • Simulated divided light • Full divided light All grille options are available in a variety of patterns. For help finding an Andersen product or dealer near you, please call us at 877.577.7655 or visit andersenwindows.com. Page 30 of 52 65 HardiePlank® Lap Siding Product Description HardiePlank® lap siding is factory-primed fiber-cement lap siding available in a variety of styles and textures. Please see your local James Hardie® product dealer for product availability. HardiePlank lap siding comes in 3657mm (12 ft) lengths. Nominal widths from 133mm (5 ¼ in) to 305mm (12 in) create a range of exposures from 100mm (4 in) to 210mm (8 ¼ in). HardiePlank lap siding is also available with ColorPlus® Technology as one of James Hardie’s prefinished products. ColorPlus® Technology is a factory applied, oven-baked finish available on a variety of James Hardie siding and trim products. See your local dealer for details and availability of products, colors, and accessories. The HZ5® product line is right at home in climates with freezing temperatures, seasonal temperature variations, snow and ice. HZ5® boards are the result of our generational evolution of our time-tested products. We’ve evolved our substrate composition to be specifically designed to perform in conditions found in these climates. To ensure that its beauty matches its durability, we’ve engineered the surface for higher performance, giving it superior paint adhesion and moisture resistance. In addition, we’ve added a drip edge to the HardiePlank® HZ5® lap siding product to provide improved water management in conditions specific to HZ5® climates. Cedarmill ©Smooth Beaded Smooth Colonial Roughsawn Beaded Cedarmill © Colonial Smooth Sloped Edge Nail Line Drip Edge Ge n e r a l Pr o d u c t In f o r m a t i o n Wo r k i n g Sa f e l y To o l s f o r Cu t t i n g a n d Fa s t e n i n g Ge n e r a l In s t a l l a t i o n Re q u i r e m e n t s Ge n e r a l Fa s t e n e r Re q u i r e m e n t s Fi n i s h i n g a n d Ma i n t e n a n c e Ha r d i e T r i m ® B o a r d s / B a t t e n s Ha r d i e S o f f i t ® P a n e l s Ha r d i e P l a n k ® L a p S i d i n g Ha r d i e S h i n g l e ® S i d i n g Ha r d i e P a n e l ® V e r t i c a l S i d i n g Ap p e n d i x / Gl o s s a r y CC M C Re p o r t Page 31 of 52 Page 32 of 52 • Attractive Appearance... Features a classic shadow effect. Lends any home a subtle, even-toned look with the warmth of wood. • Great Value... Architecturally stylish but practically priced. • High Performance... Designed with Advanced Protection® Shingle Technology, which reduces the use of natural resources while providing excellent protection for your home (visit gaf.com/APS/ to learn more). • Highest Roofing Fire Rating... UL Class A, Listed to ANSI/UL 790. • Stays In Place... Dura Grip™ Adhesive seals each shingle tightly and reduces the risk of shingle blow- off. Shingles are warranted to withstand winds up to 130 mph.1 • Peace Of Mind... Lifetime ltd. transferable warranty with Smart Choice® Protection (non-prorated material and installation labor coverage) for the first ten years.2 • Perfect Finishing Touch... Use Timbertex® Premium Ridge Cap Shingles or Ridglass® Premium Ridge Cap Shingles.3 1 This wind speed coverage requires special installation; see GAF Shingle & Accessory Ltd. Warranty for details. 2 See GAF Shingle & Accessory Ltd. Warranty for complete coverage and restrictions. The word “Lifetime” refers to the length of coverage provided by the GAF Shingle & Accessory Ltd. Warranty and means as long as the original individual owner(s) of a single-family detached residence [or the second owner(s) in certain circumstances] owns the property where the shingles are installed. For owners/structures not meeting the above criteria, Lifetime coverage is not applicable. 3 These products are not available in all areas. See www.gaf.com/ridgecapavailability for details. Value & Performance In A Natural Wood-Shake Look *Notes on Color Availability: • Arctic White only available in the Shafter area. • Pewter Gray only available in the Baltimore/Myerstown and Michigan City areas. • Timberline® Natural Shadow® Shingles are not available in the Tampa area. 19 Barkwood* Shakewood* Slate* Charcoal* Hickory* Weathered Wood* Pewter Gray* Arctic White*U.S.only ENERGY STAR® CERTIFIED! (White Only) T IMBERLINE® LIFETIME S HINGLES—N ORTH AMERICA’S #1−S ELLING ROOF Where They Fit Within The Lifetime Roofing System 1. Lifetime Shingles 2. Leak Barrier 3. Starter Strip Shingles 4. Roof Deck Protection 5. Cobra® Attic Ventilation 6. Ridge Cap Shingles 1919 hey Fit Within The Lifetime Roofing System me Shingles Barrier r Strip Shingles Deck Protection a® Attic ation Cap les 2 3 4 1 5 6 Page 33 of 52 SINGLE-HUNG WINDOWS 100 SERIES DURABLE • Virtually maintenance-free • Rigorously tested to deliver years* of smooth, reliable operation • Fibrex material construction provides long-lasting* performance • Durable, low-maintenance finish won’t fade, flake, blister or peel* • Fibrex material is twice as strong as vinyl Andersen® 100 Series single-hung windows allow ventilation through a single operable lower sash that slides up and down. Classic rectangular shapes are available, or use an arched top for added elegance. Made with our revolutionary Fibrex® composite material, 100 Series products are durable, environmentally smart and energy efficient. 100 Series products are available in deep, rich colors that complement virtually any architectural style. For added style, we offer a wide range of grille patterns and patterned glass options. ENERGY EFFICIENT • Weather-resistant construction for greater comfort and energy efficiency • Weatherstripping is designed to seal out drafts, wind and water • Variety of Low-E glass options are available to help control heating and cooling costs in any climate • Many 100 Series single-hung windows have options that make them ENERGY STAR® v. 6.0 certified throughout the U.S. BEAUTIFUL • Clean, attractive corner seams • Six exterior color options • Attractive matte finish interiors available in four colors • Add style with grilles or patterned glass Dark BronzeWhiteSandtoneTerratoneCocoa Bean Black EXTERIOR COLORS *Visit andersenwindows.com/warranty for details. “ENERGY STAR” is a registered trademark of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Page 34 of 52 For more information, visit andersenwindows.com/100series Fibrex® material combines the strength and durability of wood with the low-maintenance of vinyl. The wood fibers are reclaimed from our own factories, which makes this product sustainable and environmentally responsible. 100 SERIES SINGLE-HUNG WINDOWS HARDWARE FRAME OPTIONS 1-3/8" flange setback, 1" flange setback with stucco key or replacement configuration. INTERIOR OPTIONS HIGH-PERFORMANCE GLASS OPTIONS • Low-E glass • Low-E glass with HeatLock® technology • Low-E SmartSun™ glass • Low-E SmartSun glass with HeatLock technology Tempered glass and other glass options are available. Contact your Andersen dealer. PATTERNED GLASS Ideal for letting light into the home while obscuring vision. Available in four attractive patterns. ADDITIONAL FEATURES • Sash lock engages automatically when operable sash is closed • Operable sash has a meeting stile cover with a unique raised profile design, allowing the sash to be opened and closed easily ReedObscure FernCascade Colonial PrairieTall Fractional *Dark Bronze and Black interiors are only available with Dark Bronze and Black exteriors respectively. Printing limitations prevent exact color and finish duplication. See your Andersen dealer for actual finish samples. “Andersen” and all other marks where denoted are trademarks of Andersen Corporation. ©2017 Andersen Corporation. All rights reserved. SS_015 02/17 Optional lift handle matches the window’s interior. Single-hung windows feature hardware that automatically locks when windows are closed. Hardware color matches the window’s interior. Dark Bronze* Dark Bronze Black*White Sandtone New metal Slim Line hardware is available in White, Sandtone, Dark Bronze, Black, Satin Nickel and Antique Brass. GRILLES Choose from the following grille options: • Finelight™ grilles-between- the-glass • Finelight with exterior grilles • Simulated divided light • Full divided light All grille options are available in a variety of patterns. For help finding an Andersen product or dealer near you, please call us at 877.577.7655 or visit andersenwindows.com. Page 35 of 52 65 HardiePlank® Lap Siding Product Description HardiePlank® lap siding is factory-primed fiber-cement lap siding available in a variety of styles and textures. Please see your local James Hardie® product dealer for product availability. HardiePlank lap siding comes in 3657mm (12 ft) lengths. Nominal widths from 133mm (5 ¼ in) to 305mm (12 in) create a range of exposures from 100mm (4 in) to 210mm (8 ¼ in). HardiePlank lap siding is also available with ColorPlus® Technology as one of James Hardie’s prefinished products. ColorPlus® Technology is a factory applied, oven-baked finish available on a variety of James Hardie siding and trim products. See your local dealer for details and availability of products, colors, and accessories. The HZ5® product line is right at home in climates with freezing temperatures, seasonal temperature variations, snow and ice. HZ5® boards are the result of our generational evolution of our time-tested products. We’ve evolved our substrate composition to be specifically designed to perform in conditions found in these climates. To ensure that its beauty matches its durability, we’ve engineered the surface for higher performance, giving it superior paint adhesion and moisture resistance. In addition, we’ve added a drip edge to the HardiePlank® HZ5® lap siding product to provide improved water management in conditions specific to HZ5® climates. Cedarmill ©Smooth Beaded Smooth Colonial Roughsawn Beaded Cedarmill © Colonial Smooth Sloped Edge Nail Line Drip Edge Ge n e r a l Pr o d u c t In f o r m a t i o n Wo r k i n g Sa f e l y To o l s f o r Cu t t i n g a n d Fa s t e n i n g Ge n e r a l In s t a l l a t i o n Re q u i r e m e n t s Ge n e r a l Fa s t e n e r Re q u i r e m e n t s Fi n i s h i n g a n d Ma i n t e n a n c e Ha r d i e T r i m ® B o a r d s / B a t t e n s Ha r d i e S o f f i t ® P a n e l s Ha r d i e P l a n k ® L a p S i d i n g Ha r d i e S h i n g l e ® S i d i n g Ha r d i e P a n e l ® V e r t i c a l S i d i n g Ap p e n d i x / Gl o s s a r y CC M C Re p o r t Page 36 of 52 Page 37 of 52 • Attractive Appearance... Features a classic shadow effect. Lends any home a subtle, even-toned look with the warmth of wood. • Great Value... Architecturally stylish but practically priced. • High Performance... Designed with Advanced Protection® Shingle Technology, which reduces the use of natural resources while providing excellent protection for your home (visit gaf.com/APS/ to learn more). • Highest Roofing Fire Rating... UL Class A, Listed to ANSI/UL 790. • Stays In Place... Dura Grip™ Adhesive seals each shingle tightly and reduces the risk of shingle blow- off. Shingles are warranted to withstand winds up to 130 mph.1 • Peace Of Mind... Lifetime ltd. transferable warranty with Smart Choice® Protection (non-prorated material and installation labor coverage) for the first ten years.2 • Perfect Finishing Touch... Use Timbertex® Premium Ridge Cap Shingles or Ridglass® Premium Ridge Cap Shingles.3 1 This wind speed coverage requires special installation; see GAF Shingle & Accessory Ltd. Warranty for details. 2 See GAF Shingle & Accessory Ltd. Warranty for complete coverage and restrictions. The word “Lifetime” refers to the length of coverage provided by the GAF Shingle & Accessory Ltd. Warranty and means as long as the original individual owner(s) of a single-family detached residence [or the second owner(s) in certain circumstances] owns the property where the shingles are installed. For owners/structures not meeting the above criteria, Lifetime coverage is not applicable. 3 These products are not available in all areas. See www.gaf.com/ridgecapavailability for details. Value & Performance In A Natural Wood-Shake Look *Notes on Color Availability: • Arctic White only available in the Shafter area. • Pewter Gray only available in the Baltimore/Myerstown and Michigan City areas. • Timberline® Natural Shadow® Shingles are not available in the Tampa area. 19 Barkwood* Shakewood* Slate* Charcoal* Hickory* Weathered Wood* Pewter Gray* Arctic White*U.S.only ENERGY STAR® CERTIFIED! (White Only) T IMBERLINE® LIFETIME S HINGLES—N ORTH AMERICA’S #1−S ELLING ROOF Where They Fit Within The Lifetime Roofing System 1. Lifetime Shingles 2. Leak Barrier 3. Starter Strip Shingles 4. Roof Deck Protection 5. Cobra® Attic Ventilation 6. Ridge Cap Shingles 1919 hey Fit Within The Lifetime Roofing System me Shingles Barrier r Strip Shingles Deck Protection a® Attic ation Cap les 2 3 4 1 5 6 Page 38 of 52 TEXAS HISTORICAL COMMISSION Properties Documented with the THC Form in 2007 and/or 1984 That Have Not Changed Preservation Priority County Williamson Local District:Old Town District Address:1011 College St 2016 Survey ID:124220 City Georgetown 2016 Preservation Priority:Medium SECTION 1 Basic Inventory Information WCAD ID:R042045Property Type:Building Structure Object Site District Date Recorded 5/2/2016Recorded by:CMEC EstimatedActual Source:2007 surveyConstruction Date:1900 Bungalow Other: Center Passage ShotgunOpen2-roomModified L-plan Rectangular T-plan Four Square L-plan Irregular Plan* International Ranch No Style Post-war Modern Commercial Style Other: Pueblo Revival Prairie Art Deco Spanish Colonial Craftsman Moderne Gothic Revival Neo-Classical Mission Tudor Revival Beaux Arts Monterey Shingle Folk Victorian Renaissance Revival Romanesque Revival Colonial Revival Exotic Revival Log traditional Italianate Eastlake Greek Revival Second Empire Queen Anne Stylistic Influence(s)* Note: See additional photo(s) on following page(s) General Notes: (Notes from 2007 Survey: stone veneer at porch post bases) High Medium Priority: Low High Medium Low ID:1034 ID:670 *Photographs and Preservation Priority have been updated in 2016, and the year built date has also been reviewed. However, the plan and style data are sourced directly from the 2007 survey. 2007 Survey 1984 Survey Current/Historic Name None/None ID:124220 2016 Survey High Medium Low Explain:Property retains a relatively high degree of integrity; property is significant and contributes to neighborhood character Latitude:30.634301 Longitude -97.671588 None Selected None Selected Photo direction: Southeast Page 39 of 52 TEXAS HISTORICAL COMMISSION Properties Documented with the THC Form in 2007 and/or 1984 That Have Not Changed Preservation Priority County Williamson Local District:Old Town District Address:1011 College St 2016 Survey ID:124220 City Georgetown 2016 Preservation Priority:Medium Additional Photos NortheastPhoto Direction EastPhoto Direction Shed EastPhoto Direction Page 40 of 52 Planning Department Staff Report Historic and Architectural Review Commission 2019-25-COA – 1101 S College Street Page 1 of 12 Meeting Date: June 27, 2019 File Number: 2019-25-COA AGENDA ITEM DESCRIPTION Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Appropriateness for a Residential Addition and Alteration at the property located a 1011 S. College Street, bearing the legal description of Dimmit Addition, BLOCK 86 (PTS), ACRES 0.27, (2019-25-COA) AGENDA ITEM DETAILS Project Name: Smith Residence Remodel and Addition Applicant: J. Bryant Boyd Design Build Property Owner: James & Carrie Smith Property Address: 1011 S College Street Legal Description: Dimmit Addition, BLOCK 86 (PTS), ACRES 0.27 Historic Overlay: Old Town Overlay Case History: No notable case history HISTORIC CONTEXT Date of construction: 1900 Historic Resources Survey Level of Priority: 1984 – Low 2007 – Medium 2016 – Medium National Register Designation: No Texas Historical Commission Designation: No APPLICANT’S REQUEST The applicant is proposing a remodel and three additions. The scope of works includes replacement of roof and windows, removal of a street-facing porch ½ wall, demolition of a non-historic addition and the demolition of a non-historic garage. The following list specifies the specific work proposed by the applicant. Portions of the request are reviewed by staff and HARC per UDC 3.13.010, including: HARC: - Street-facing wall removal (masonry porch ½ wall) - Removal and replacement of windows - Street-facing addition (garage and studio) Staff Review: - Demolition of rear addition (non-historical) - Non-street facing addition (non-historical) Page 41 of 52 Planning Department Staff Report Historic and Architectural Review Commission 2019-25-COA – 1101 S College Street Page 2 of 12 STAFF ANALYSIS The 2016 Historic Resource Survey identifies this as a single- story, center passage residential structure with an estimated construction date of 1900. The survey notes that the structure lacks stylistic influences, however, according to the applicant, the original house is traditional vernacular with some Victorian elements. The 2007 resource survey noted that the porch post bases are made of stone veneer. The 1984 resource survey identified the house as a low priority structure and the 2007 and 2016 surveys listed it as a medium priority structure. The applicant’s request includes three items to be reviewed by HARC. Exhibit 2 (Letter of Intent) and Exhibit 3 (Plans & Renderings) provide more detail and pictures for the following requests. - The first request to be reviewed by HARC is to remove the existing masonry porch ½ wall between the middle columns. Based in the construction of the ½ wall, it is highly likely that it is not original to the house. The applicant states that the stucco that was applied to the surface is cracking. - The second request to be reviewed by HARC is to replace all the windows on the structure. The existing windows are of various styles, which makes it difficult to confirm if they are original. The applicant states that the windows are in poor condition (rotting frames, leaking air/water, and inoperable sashes), making them non-energy efficient. The proposed windows will be composite fiberglass and will reflect the original architectural style of the structure. The applicant also proposes reducing the number of windows on the south side of the structure from seven (7) to five (5). Page 42 of 52 Planning Department Staff Report Historic and Architectural Review Commission 2019-25-COA – 1101 S College Street Page 3 of 12 - The third request is the addition of two street facing accessory structures, detached from the historic structure at the rear of the property. The structures are a 2-car frame garage (552 SF) and a studio (453 SF). The structures are not attached to each other, but the plans show a veranda between the two structures. The veranda is not a part of this request, as it is not street facing. The applicant proposes a combination of clapboard and board & batt siding for the rear yard structures. Page 43 of 52 Planning Department Staff Report Historic and Architectural Review Commission 2019-25-COA – 1101 S College Street Page 4 of 12 The following requests were reviewed by the HPO. These requests meet the intent of the Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines and maintain the integrity of the structure; therefore, they are appropriate. - The first request was the demolition of an existing addition (porch) on the rear of the structure. The applicant indicated this the addition has a failing foundation. The addition is not historic. - The second request was the construction of a rear addition in place of the demolished addition (porch). The new addition will be similar in size and form. - The third request is the replacement of the roof. The existing roof is made of composite shingles. The applicant is proposing to replace the roof with composition shingles. The existing roof has a variety of pitches due to past additions, including porches that were closed in to provide more living space. This created various ceiling heights throughout the house. The applicant is proposing to raze the roof on the north and south side of the structure and reconstruct it in the same style to provide consistent ceiling height throughout the structure. The proposed roof is consistent with the Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines. APPLICABLE DESIGN GUIDELINES The following guidelines are applicable to the proposed scope of work in accordance with the adopted Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines: CHAPTER 6 DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR INDIVIDUAL BUILDING ELEMENTS REQUEST: REPLACEMENT OF ALL WINDOWS 6.12 Preserve the position, number, size, and arrangement of historic windows and doors in a building wall. × Enclosing an historic opening in a key character-defining facade is inappropriate, as is adding a new opening. ✓ Do not close down an original opening to accommodate a smaller window. Restoring original openings which have been altered over time is encouraged. ✓ Historically, windows had a vertical emphasis. The proportions of these windows contribute to the character of each residence and commercial storefront. Partially Complies The south-facing façade currently has seven (7) windows. The applicant proposes converting a cluster of four (4) windows to two (2) windows. Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines state that enclosing a historic opening is inappropriate. The south-facing façade is visible from the street, but is not Page 44 of 52 Planning Department Staff Report Historic and Architectural Review Commission 2019-25-COA – 1101 S College Street Page 5 of 12 parallel to the street and therefore not considered a key character-defining facade. If the applicant retains the opening size and installs two (2) large windows, the request may be appropriate. However, if the applicant retains two (2) windows and closes the other two (2) openings, the request may not be appropriate. 6.14 Maintenance of windows. - Wash windows. - Clean debris from windows. - Replace loose or broken glass in kind. This will reduce air leaks. - Replace damaged muntins, moldings, or glazing compound with material that matches the original in shape, size, and material. - Repair window hardware or replace with materials that match the original in scale and design. If the replacement hardware does not match the original design it should be simple, unobtrusive, and compatible with the style and building’s period of significance. - Install weather-stripping. This will enhance energy conservation significantly. - Maintain the interior views, so that either merchandise or furniture can be seen. Partially Complies The applicant is proposing to replace the windows, in lieu of maintaining the existing windows. The replacement of the windows will be visually compatible. 6.15 Repair wood features by patching, piecing-in, consolidating, or otherwise reinforcing the wood. https://www.nps.gov/tps/how-to-preserve/briefs/9-wooden- windows.htm Does Not Comply The applicant is proposing to replace the windows. 6.20 When window or door replacement is necessary, match the replacement to the original design as closely as possible. ✓ Preserve the original casing, when feasible. ✓ If the original is double-hung, then the replacement window should also be doublehung, or at a minimum, appear to be so. Match the replacement also in the number and position of glass panes. ✓ Very ornate windows or doors that are not appropriate to the building’s architectural style are inappropriate. Partially Complies The UDC was recently updated to state that, “Material that is intended to replace a historic material or feature that is either the same or a similar material, and the result will match all visual aspects, including form, color, and Page 45 of 52 Planning Department Staff Report Historic and Architectural Review Commission 2019-25-COA – 1101 S College Street Page 6 of 12 ✓ Using the same material (wood) as the original is preferred. ✓ A new screen door added to the front of a visible door should be “full view” design or with minimal structural dividers to retain the visibility of the historic door behind it. N/A ✓ A screen door should be sized to fit the original entrance opening and the design should be of the appropriate style and period of the building. N/A ✓ Security doors are non-historic additions. If installed, they should follow the guidelines for screen doors. N/A workmanship in order to retain the original design of the structure, may be permitted by the identified decision maker for medium and low priority resources.” The applicant proposes replacing all windows with Andersen composite fiberglass (100 Series) windows with the lite pattern (3 over 1). This is not the same is the original material; however, these windows would reflect the original architecture of the structure. Replacement of the windows would also be in line with the maintenance goals of Chapter 6.14 in terms of scale and design. CHAPTER 7 DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR ADAPTIVE RE-USE, ADDITIONS & ALTERATIONS REQUEST: REMOVAL OF STREET FACING WALL (MASONRY PORCH ½ WALL) AND ADDITION OF STREET FACING FACADES 7.1 Avoid alterations that would damage historic features. ✓ Avoid alterations that would hinder the ability to interpret the design character of the original building. ✓ Alterations that seek to imply an earlier period than that of the building are inappropriate. Complies The proposed changes to the existing structure will not damage historic features nor imply a different architectural period. Based on the construction of the ½ wall, it is highly likely that the ½ wall is not a part of the original structure. 7.6 Design a new addition such that the original character can be clearly seen. In this way, a viewer can understand the history of changes that have occurred to the building. ✓ An addition should be made distinguishable from the original building, even in subtle ways, such that the character of the original can be interpreted. ✓ Creating a jog in the foundation between the original and new structures may help to define an addition. Partially Complies The applicant is not proposing any addition, only an alteration (removal of the ½ wall). Removal of the wall will reinstate the front entrance. Page 46 of 52 Planning Department Staff Report Historic and Architectural Review Commission 2019-25-COA – 1101 S College Street Page 7 of 12 ✓ The amount of foundation exposed on the addition should match that of the original building, in appearance, detail, and material. ✓ Even applying a new trim board at the connection point between the addition and the original structure can help define the addition. ✓ See also Preservation Briefs #14: New Exterior Additions to Historic Buildings, published by the National Park Service. https://www.nps.gov/tps/how-to-preserve/briefs/14- exterior-additions.htm The addition of the garage and studio in the rear yard are differentiated roofing materials and a vertical siding pattern. 7.7 Place an addition at the rear of a building or set it back from the front to minimize the visual impacts. ✓ Setting an addition back from any primary, character- defining façade will allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. ✓ Locating an addition at the front of a structure is inappropriate, and an addition should be to the rear of the building, when feasible. Complies The applicant is not proposing any addition in place of the ½ wall. Addition placed at rear of structure. 7.8 Do not obscure, damage, destroy, or remove original architectural details and materials of the primary structure. ✓ When preserving original details and materials, follow the guidelines presented earlier in this chapter. Complies Based on the construction of the ½ wall, it is highly likely that the ½ wall is not a part of the original structure. Removal would not alter any original architectural details. Removal would open up the porch and expose more details. 7.9 An addition shall be compatible in scale, materials, and character with the main building. ✓ An addition shall relate to the historic building in mass, scale, and form. It should be designed to remain subordinate to the main structure. ✓ While a smaller addition is visually preferable, if a residential addition would be significantly larger than the original building, one option is to separate it from the primary building, when feasible, and then link it with a smaller connecting structure. ✓ An addition should be simple in design to prevent it from competing with the primary facade. Complies The applicant is not proposing any addition, only an alteration (removal of the ½ wall). New addition is replacing a non- historic previous addition. In terms of scale, new addition is only adding 70 sq. ft. Page 47 of 52 Planning Department Staff Report Historic and Architectural Review Commission 2019-25-COA – 1101 S College Street Page 8 of 12 − Consider adding dormers to create second story spaces before changing the scale of the building by adding a full second floor. N/A 7.10 The roof form of a new addition shall be in character with that of the primary building. ✓ Typically, gable, hip, and shed roofs are appropriate for residential additions. Flat roofs are appropriate for commercial buildings in the downtown area. ✓ Repeat existing roof slopes, overhangs, and materials. ✓ If the roof of the primary building is symmetrically proportioned, the roof of the addition should be similar. ✓ The roofs of additions should not interfere with the original roof form by changing its basic shape or view of the original roof, and should have a roof form compatible with the original building. Complies Roof extended, pitch and style maintained. CHAPTER 14 DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR INFILL CONSTRUCTION AND ADDITIONS IN THE OLD TOWN OVERLAY DISTRICT REQUEST: ADDITION OF STREET FACING FACADES 14.1 Locate a new building using a residential type setback. − Align the new non-residential building front at a setback that is in context with the area properties- N/A − New residential buildings should meet the minimum front setback requirement of the UDC or use an increased setback if the block has historically developed with an extended setback- N/A ✓ Generally, additions should not be added to the front facing façades. − Where no sidewalk exists, one should be installed that aligns with nearby sidewalks. N/A Complies The garage and studio structures conform to the zoning setbacks. 14.9 Historic building materials of existing buildings should be maintained and respected when additions are proposed. ✓ See Chapter 5 for design guidelines related to maintaining and protecting historic building materials. Partially Complies The applicant is requesting to replace all of the existing wood windows. 14.10 Non-traditional siding materials are discouraged. ✓ Typically, artificial stone and brick veneer are not appropriate. ✓ Asphalt shingles are not appropriate. ✓ Aluminum and vinyl are not appropriate. Complies Applicant is proposing Hardie Plank lap siding and composite shingles 14.11 Avoid alterations that would damage historic features. − Avoid alterations that would hinder the ability to interpret the design character of the original building or period of significance. N/A Complies The proposed additions are compatible with the existing historic structure. Page 48 of 52 Planning Department Staff Report Historic and Architectural Review Commission 2019-25-COA – 1101 S College Street Page 9 of 12 ✓ Alterations that seek to imply an earlier period than that of the building are inappropriate. 14.12 An addition shall be compatible in scale, materials, and character with the main building. ✓ An addition shall relate to the building in mass, scale, and form. It should be designed to remain subordinate to the main structure ✓ An addition to the front of a building is usually inappropriate. Complies The attached addition is subordinate in both size and visibility to the existing historic structure. 14.13 Design a new addition such that the original character can be clearly seen. ✓ In this way, a viewer can understand the history of changes that have occurred to the building. ✓ An addition should be distinguishable from the original building, even in subtle ways, such that the character of the original can be interpreted. ✓ Creating a jog in the foundation between the original and new structures may help to define an addition. ✓ Even applying new trim board at the connection point between the addition and the original structure can help define the addition. ✓ See also Preservation Briefs #14: New Exterior Additions to Historic Buildings, published by the National Park Service. Partially Complies The roof, foundation and windows of the attached addition will all be the same. The new addition will use Hardie Plank siding to differentiate the new structure from the historic. The new addition will not include a jog in the foundation. 14.14 Place an addition at the rear of a building or set it back from the front to minimize the visual impacts. • Setting an addition back from any primary, character- defining façade will allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. • Locating an addition at the front of a structure is inappropriate, and an addition should be to the rear of the building, when feasible. Complies The attached addition is placed at the rear of the historic structure. The other two additions are detached and placed at the rear of the property. 14.15 Do not obscure, damage, destroy, or remove original architectural details and materials of the primary structure. ✓ When preserving original details and materials, follow the guidelines presented in this document. Complies The addition does not remove, alter, or damage existing architectural details. 14.16 An addition shall be compatible in scale, materials, and character with the main building. ✓ An addition shall relate to the historic building in mass, scale, and form. It should be designed to remain subordinate to the main structure. Complies Two of the additions are replacing non-historic, previous additions. In terms of scale, the attached new addition is only adding 70 sq. ft. Page 49 of 52 Planning Department Staff Report Historic and Architectural Review Commission 2019-25-COA – 1101 S College Street Page 10 of 12 ✓ While a smaller addition is visually preferable, if a residential addition would be significantly larger than the original building, one option is to separate it from the primary building, when feasible, and then link it with a smaller connecting structure. ✓ An addition should be simple in design to prevent it from competing with the primary facade. − Consider adding dormers to create second story spaces before changing the scale of the building by adding a full second floor. N/A 14.17 An addition shall be set back from any primary, character - defining façade. • An addition should be to the rear of the building, when feasible. Complies No additions are proposed to the primary, character defining facade. 14.18 The roof of a new addition shall be in character with that of the primary building. ✓ Typically, gable, hip, and shed roofs are appropriate for residential additions. Flat roofs may be more appropriate for commercial buildings. ✓ Repeat existing roof slopes and materials. ✓ If the roof of the primary building is symmetrically proportioned, the roof of the addition should be similar. Complies The rooflines are typical of single-family residential styles. 14.19 The architectural features of existing buildings should be protected when additions are proposed. ✓ See Chapter 4 for design guidelines related to protecting architectural features. Complies The architectural features of the existing buildings are maintained and protected. 14.20 An addition shall not damage or obscure architecturally important features. ✓ For example, loss or alteration of a porch should be avoided. ✓ Addition of a porch may be inappropriate Complies The addition does not damage important features. 14.22 Individual building elements of existing buildings should be preserved, protected, and replicated where appropriate when additions are proposed. ✓ See Chapter 6 for design guidelines related to preserving individual building elements. Complies Page 50 of 52 Planning Department Staff Report Historic and Architectural Review Commission 2019-25-COA – 1101 S College Street Page 11 of 12 CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL In accordance with Section 3.13.030 of the Unified Development Code, the HARC must consider the following criteria: SECTION 3.13.030 CRITERIA FINDINGS 1. The application is complete and the information contained within the application is correct and sufficient enough to allow adequate review and final action; Complies 2. Compliance with any design standards of this Code; Complies 3. Compliance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties to the most extent practicable; Complies 4. Compliance with the adopted Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines, as may be amended from time to time, specific to the applicable Historic Overlay District; Partially Complies 5. The general historic, cultural, and architectural integrity of the building, structure or site is preserved; Complies 6. New buildings or additions are designed to be compatible with surrounding properties in the applicable historic overlay district; Complies 7. The overall character of the applicable historic overlay district is protected; and Complies 8. The Master Sign Plan is in keeping with the adopted Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines and character of the historic overlay district. N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff finds that the proposed replacement of all windows and removal of the masonry porch ½ wall meet the Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines. The materials proposed for the replacement of the windows are similar materials, which is allowed by the UDC for low and medium priority structures. The design respects the historic integrity of the existing structure and does not have a significant visual impact on the structure. Staff recommends approval of the street-facing ½ wall removal, the replacement of all windows and the addition of two street facing facades at the rear of the property. The creation of two (2) new street facing facades are compatible in scale, materials, and character with the main building and surrounding properties in the historic overlay district. As of the date of this report, staff has not received any written comments. ATTACHMENTS Exhibit 1 – Location Map Exhibit 2 – Letter of Intent Exhibit 3 – Plans and Renderings Exhibit 4 – Materials PUBLIC COMMENTS Page 51 of 52 Planning Department Staff Report Historic and Architectural Review Commission 2019-25-COA – 1101 S College Street Page 12 of 12 Exhibit 5 – Historic Resource Survey SUBMITTED BY Chelsea Irby, Senior Planner and Nat Waggoner, AICP, Long Range Planning Manager Page 52 of 52