Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda_HARC_06.26.2014Notice of Meeting for the Historic and Architectural Review Commission of the City of Georgetown June 26, 2014 at 6:00 PM at Council and Courts Building, 101 E. 7th Street Georgetown, TX 78626 The City of Georgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If you require assistance in participating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the ADA, reasonable assistance, adaptations, or accommodations will be provided upon request. Please contact the City at least four (4) days prior to the scheduled meeting date, at (512) 930-3652 or City Hall at 113 East 8th Street for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. Regular Session (This Regular Session may, at any time, be recessed to convene an Executive Session for any purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code 551.) A The Historic and Architectural Review Commission (HARC), appointed by the Mayor and the City Council, is responsible for hearing and taking final action on Certificates of Design Compliance applications based upon the City Council adopted Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines and Unified Development Code. The Commission may, at any time, recess the Regular Session to convene an Executive Session at the request of the Chair, a Commissioner, the Director or legal counsel for any purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code Chapter 551. Welcome and Meeting Procedures: Staff Presentation Applicant Presentation (Limited to ten minutes unless stated otherwise by the Commission) Questions from Commission to Staff and Applicant Comments from Citizens* Applicant Response Commission Deliberative Process Commission Action *Those who wish to speak must turn in a speaker form, located at the back of the room, to the recording secretary before the item they wish to address begins. Each speaker will be permitted to address the Commission one time only for a maximum of three minutes. Legislative Regular Agenda B Discussion and possible action to approve the minutes from the May 22, 2014 regular meeting. C Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for Demolition for the structure located at 1912 South Church Street bearing the legal description of Eubank Addition, Block 7, Lots 1 & 2 (PT), .15 acres (CDC-2014-022) D Conceptual design review for the historic structure located at 401 South Myrtle Street. E Conceptual design review for the historic structure located at 302 East 7th Street. F Update from Sign Subcommittee. G Questions and comments from Commissioners in Training. H Staff updates and reminder of future meetings. Adjournment CERTIFICATE OF POSTING I, Jessica Brettle, City Secretary for the City of Georgetown, Texas, do hereby certify that this Notice of Meeting was posted at City Hall, 113 E. 8th Street, a place readily accessible to the general public at all times, on the ______ day of __________________, 2014, at __________, and remained so posted for at least 72 continuous hours preceding the scheduled time of said meeting. ____________________________________ Jessica Brettle, City Secretary City of Georgetown, Texas SUBJECT: The Historic and Architectural Review Commission (HARC), appointed by the Mayor and the City Council, is responsible for hearing and taking final action on Certificates of Design Compliance applications based upon the City Council adopted Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines and Unified Development Code. The Commission may, at any time, recess the Regular Session to convene an Executive Session at the request of the Chair, a Commissioner, the Director or legal counsel for any purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code Chapter 551. Welcome and Meeting Procedures: Staff Presentation Applicant Presentation (Limited to ten minutes unless stated otherwise by the Commission) Questions from Commission to Staff and Applicant Comments from Citizens* Applicant Response Commission Deliberative Process Commission Action *Those who wish to speak must turn in a speaker form, located at the back of the room, to the recording secretary before the item they wish to address begins. Each speaker will be permitted to address the Commission one time only for a maximum of three minutes. ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: None SUBMITTED BY: Karen Frost, Recording Secretary City of Georgetown, Texas SUBJECT: Discussion and possible action to approve the minutes from the May 22, 2014 regular meeting. ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. SUBMITTED BY: Karen Frost, Recording Secretary ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Minutes of the May 22, 2014 Mtg Backup Material Historic and Architectural Review Commission Page 1 of 3 Meeting: May 22, 2014 City of Georgetown, Texas Historic and Architectural Review Commission Meeting Minutes Thursday, May 22, 2014 at 6:00 p.m. Council and Courts Building 101 E. 7th Street, Georgetown, TX 78626 Members present: Anna Eby, Chair; Nancy Knight, Vice- Chair; Jennifer Brown; David Paul; Richard Mee, Ty Gibson, and Mary Jo Winder. Commissioners in Training present: Barbara Price Commissioners absent: Rodolfo Martinez (CIT) Staff present: Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner; Laurie Brewer, Assistant City Manager; Andreina Davila, Project Coordinator; Tamera Baird, Building Plans Reviewer; Karen Frost, Recording Secretary. A. Call to Order by Eby at 6:09 p.m. with the reading of the meeting procedures. * Those who speak must turn in a speaker form, located at the back of the room, to the recording secretary before the item that they wish to address begins. Each speaker will be permitted to address the Commission one time only for a maximum of three (3) minutes. This Regular Session may, at any time, be recessed to convene an Executive Session for any purpose authorized by the Open Meeting Act, Texas Government Code 551. Legislative Agenda: B. Consideration and possible approval of the minutes of the April 24, 2014 regular meeting. Winder pointed out a grammatical error on the bottom of the first page. Motion by Knight to approve the minutes as presented with the noted changes. Second by Mee. Approved 7 -0. C. Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for demolition for the structures located at 101 and 109 West 2nd Street bearing the legal description of City of Georgetown, Block 2, Lots 2-4, & Pt Abandoned Rd, .582 acres, and Lots 5-7, (pt) 8 & Abandoned Rd, .704 acres. (CDC-2014-019) Synatschk presented the staff report. The applicant is seeking approval to demolish the historic structures that are identified as Low Priority structures on the 1984 and 2007 Historic Resources Survey. The applicant has a future development plan for the site that is more appropriate and compatible with the historic overlay district. Staff recommends that the HARC make their findings based on the required approval criteria of UDC Sections 3.13.030 and 3.13.040. Should the HARC approve the request, the documentation of the existing structure and post-demolition requirements of UDC Section 3.13.070 shall apply. Should the HARC deny the request, the demolition delay process outlined in UDC Section 3.13.010.D.2 shall apply. The applicant, Austin Pfeister, was present for any questions. He explained that alterations were made to the buildings many years ago that destroyed the historic elements, including exterior Historic and Architectural Review Commission Page 2 of 3 Meeting: May 22, 2014 changes and footprint additions. They are not able to move the structures based on their foundations. He showed a denser concept plan for the use of the lots. Eby opened the Public Hearing at 6:24 p.m. and closed it with no speakers coming forward. Winder asked if the Demo Committee asked for a site plan submittal with the application. Synatschk stated they did not ask for that. Motion by Winder to approve CDC-2014-019 based on findings D.1. of the Staff Report: For a request to replace a structure with a new structure, it finds the new structure is more appropriate and compatible with the historic overlay district than the structure to be demolished or relocated. Second by Paul. Approved 7 – 0. D. Preservation Brief – The National Register of Historic Places Synatschk presented the Brief and explained what it means for properties to be listed in the National Register, and how to use the National Register as a Preservation Planning Tool. He also showed several examples of National Historic Landmarks. E. Update from Sign Subcommittee Knight reported that Sign CDC’s were approved by the Subcommittee for Sky Realty on Austin Avenue and Ruby K’s on Church Street. She also explained that they had a discussion on how to be proactive when signs have been installed without previous approvals or permits. Brewer spoke to the issue and explained that the tenant or owner applicant is told that by having put the sign installed, they are running a risk of having to come in to compliance at a later date and having to remake and reinstall the sign. She explained that staff and commissioners’ goal is compliance, not punishment. Code Enforcement’s focus is to work with people and businesses towards compliance. F. Briefing of Customer Bulletins 112: Certificate of Design Compliance Process, 113: Certificate of Design Compliance for Demolition or Relocation of a Structure Process, and 114: Procedures for completing and submitting a Certificate of Design Compliance Application (Submittal Requirements). Davila reviewed the customer bulletins, when they are used and where they are published. They are published for use by anyone on the website at https://planning.georgetown.org/planning- department-correspondence/. G. Information and discussion on the conversion to the paperless meeting format (digital agenda packets). Davila explained the new process and Frost assisted the commissioners with the computers as they walked through the process of opening agendas and agenda items online. H. Questions and comments from Commissioners in Training Price commented that she appreciates all the hard work that goes into the review of each case. She expressed concern about the impact of new development on existing residential neighborhoods. She asked that the commissioners and staff continue to consider the neighboring properties of the applications, including the increased impervious cover, and the feel of the neighborhood, along with the implications to the river through the area. Synatschk explained that many of those items were addressed by staff during the platting application and not the purview of the commission. They are definitely being considered. Historic and Architectural Review Commission Page 3 of 3 Meeting: May 22, 2014 I. Staff updates and reminder of future meetings. The Sign Subcommittee will meet June 9th. The next regular HARC meeting is June 22nd , not sure about the sign subcommittee meeting yet. The CLG grant that was applied for in regards to the Historic Resource Survey has been approved and the city is putting out request for proposals from vendors later this month. Synatschk reported the Sweet Lemon Inn was open and so far had no complaints. 108 W. 8th Street was closed for now but was expecting a tenant by the end of July. The Texas Historic Highways Initiative, which is a partnership between TxDOT (funding) and Texas Historical Commission (surveying) has completed one major highway which runs from Baltimore to San Diego, parallel between I-20 and I-30, is open and has many historic markers featured all along it. The next big project is the Meridian Highway which will cut through Georgetown, starting next year, and include public involvement and hearings. This will be a great opportunity for Commissioners and citizens to get involved in this national project. J. Adjournment Eby adjourned the meeting at 7:30 p.m. ________________________________ __________________________________ Approved, Anna Eby, Chair Attest, Nancy Knight City of Georgetown, Texas SUBJECT: Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for Demolition for the structure located at 1912 South Church Street bearing the legal description of Eubank Addition, Block 7, Lots 1 & 2 (PT), .15 acres (CDC-2014-022) ITEM SUMMARY: The City of Georgetown is in receipt of a request for a CDC for Demolition of the structure located at 1912 South Church Street. According to the submitted letter of intent, the applicant wishes to demolish the structure in order to replace it with a structure that is more compatible with the district. Staff recommends approval of the request based on the findings that the meets the approval criteria of Sections 3.13.030 and 3.13.040 of the Unified Development Code (UDC), as outlined in the attached Staff Report. The affirmative vote of the majority of the HARC members is required to approve the CDC request. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. The applicant paid the required application fees. SUBMITTED BY: Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner ATTACHMENTS: Description Type CDC-2014-022 Staff Report Backup Material CDC-2014-022 Exhibit A - Letter of Intent Backup Material CDC-2014-022 Exhibit B - Current photos Backup Material CDC-2014-022 Exhibit C - Historic Resources Survey Form Backup Material CDC-2014-022 Exhibit D - Proposed new construction Backup Material Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report Historic and Architectural Review Commission CDC-2014-022 – 1912 South Church Street Page 1 of 7 Meeting Date: June 26, 2014 Agenda Item: C File Number: CDC-2014-022 AGENDA ITEM DESCRIPTION Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for Demolition for the structure located at 1912 South Church Street bearing the legal description of Eubank Addition, Block 7, Lots 1 & 2 (PT), .15 acres AGENDA ITEM DETAILS Project Name: 1912 Church Street Demolition Applicant: Lisa Laughlin Property Owner: Laughlin Investments, LLC Property Address: 1912 South Church Street Legal Description: Eubank Addition, Block 7, Lots 1 & 2(PT), .15 acres Historic Overlay: Old Town Case History: This is the first review and public hearing for the case HISTORIC CONTEXT Date of construction: 1947 Historic Resources Survey Level of Priority: Unlisted National Register Designation: Not eligible for listing in the National Register Texas Historical Commission Designation: No state designation APPLICANT’S REQUEST The applicant seeks approval from the Historic and Architectural Review Commission (“HARC”) for a Certificate of Design Compliance (“CDC”) for Demolition to demolish the historic structure located at 1912 South Church Street. The existing structure, built in 1947, is not listed on the 1984 or the 2007 Historic Resource Survey; however, it is located in the Old Town Overlay District. The applicant wishes to demolish the existing structure to facilitate future development of the site (see Exhibit A). The applicant seeks approval for the CDC to replace the existing structure with a new structure that is more appropriate and compatible with the historic overlay district (UDC Section 3.13.020.D.2.a) and under other special circumstances (UDC Section 3.13.020.D.2.e). Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report Historic and Architectural Review Commission CDC-2014-022 – 1912 South Church Street Page 2 of 7 APPLICABLE DESIGN GUIDELINES The following guidelines are applicable to the proposed scope of work in accordance with the adopted Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines: GUIDELINES FINDINGS Not applicable The Design Guidelines do not address criteria for demolition. Any future development will be submitted to the HARC for CDC approval, if required. STAFF ANALYSIS The property subject to this request is generally located at the northwest corner of South Church Street and East 18th Street. The property consists of an approximate 1,400-square foot wood frame and asbestos shingle clad single-family detached structure from the early 20th century. The primary structure was most recently used as a residence, but is currently vacant. The structure has been significantly altered, including removal of a primary façade and an addition to the existing garage. Staff completed a site visit on April 24, 2014, which revealed multiple additions to the structure, significantly altering the structure and reducing its historic significance. Photos provided by the applicant demonstrate the significant deterioration of exterior features and modern interiors (see Exhibit B). The structure does not represent any architectural style and is not associated with any local history (see Exhibit C). The applicant requests approval of a CDC for Demolition to remove the non-contributing structure and construct a new structure that will be more appropriate for the Old Town Overlay District. Infill construction in the Old Town Overlay District will not require a CDC for New Construction provided the structure meets the development regulations for single-family structures outlined in Chapter 4.09 of the City of Georgetown’s Unified Development Code (“UDC”). In accordance with Section 3.13.D.1 of the UDC, “No building or structure within the Downtown Overlay District, Old Town Overlay District or any other Historic Overlay District or on the List of Priority Structures shall be demolished or relocated unless such demolition or relocation is approved by the Historic and Architectural Review Commission and a Certificate of Design Compliance for such demolition has been granted. However, this authority shall not supersede the Building Official’s authority under Chapter 15.40, “Dangerous Building Ordinance,” of the Georgetown Municipal Code.” The subject property is located within the Old Town Overlay District, requiring an approved CDC for Demolition prior to demolition. UDC Section 3.13.010.D details the applicability requirements for a CDC for Demolition. In accordance with the UDC, the Demolition Subcommittee was appointed on December 12, 2013. The subcommittee met with the applicant and conducted a site visit of the subject property on April 24, 2014, to establish the minimum requirements for application submittal. According to the submitted application, the Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report Historic and Architectural Review Commission CDC-2014-022 – 1912 South Church Street Page 3 of 7 applicant is requesting a CDC for Demolition pursuant to Section 3.13.020.D.1.a: To replace the structure with a new structure that is more appropriate and compatible with the historic overlay district; and Section 3.13.020D.1.e: Other special circumstances, as described and justified by the applicant. The 1947 structure is not listed on the 1984 and 2007 Historic Resources Survey. In addition, the Historic Resources Survey Form, completed by an architect satisfying the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for Architectural Historian, indicates the structure is not eligible for individual listing in the National Register of Historic Places, nor considered a contributing structure to a National Register district (see Exhibit C). CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL In accordance with Section 3.13.030 of the Unified Development Code, the HARC must consider the following criteria: SECTION 3.13.030 CRITERIA FINDINGS A. The application is complete and the information contained within the application is correct and sufficient enough to allow adequate review and final action; The application complies with this requirement. The HARC Demolition Subcommittee established the minimum application requirements for submittal of the CDC application at its April 24, 2014 Pre-Application Meeting. In addition to the information required in the UDC, the Demolition Subcommittee requested the following supplemental application requirements: 1. A Historic Resources Survey Form, to be completed by a consultant satisfying the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards. The CDC for Demolition application was received on May 19, 2014, and deemed complete on May 26, 2014. B. Compliance with any design standards of the Unified Development Code; Not applicable to this case. The UDC’s design guidelines do not apply to the demolition of an existing structure. The proposed structure and any future development on site will require the submittal and review of Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report Historic and Architectural Review Commission CDC-2014-022 – 1912 South Church Street Page 4 of 7 SECTION 3.13.030 CRITERIA FINDINGS applicable development applications in accordance with the UDC. Review of applicable development applications will include the review of the proposed scope of work to ensure compliance with all design and development standards as specified in the UDC. C. Compliance with the adopted Downtown Design Guidelines, as may be amended from time to time, specific to the applicable Historic or Overlay District; Not applicable. The proposed structure will not require a CDC if it complies with the UDC design standards outlined in Section 4.09. D. The integrity of an individual historic structure is preserved. The application complies with this requirement. The approved CDC will result in the removal of a non-contributing historic structure; however, the structure is not eligible for additional historic designations due to lack of historic integrity. E. New buildings or additions are designed to be compatible with surrounding historic properties. Not applicable to this case. The scope of work subject to this CDC application is for demolition only and does not include the review of new infill construction or additions to an existing structure. The future infill development will comply with the regulations established by the UDC. F. The overall character of the Historic or applicable Overlay District is protected. The application complies with the requirement. The existing structure has been deemed a noncontributing structure to the district. Thus, removal of the structure will not have an adverse effect on the character of the Old Town Overlay District. G. Signs that are out of keeping with the adopted design standards, and are not in character with the site or landmarks within the Historic or applicable Overlay District in question will not be permitted. Not Applicable. This CDC application does not include any signage for review. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. H. The following may also be considered by the HARC when determining whether to approve The application complies with this requirement. Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report Historic and Architectural Review Commission CDC-2014-022 – 1912 South Church Street Page 5 of 7 SECTION 3.13.030 CRITERIA FINDINGS a Certificate for Design Compliance: 1. The effect of the proposed change upon the general historic, cultural, and architectural nature of the site, landmark, or District. 2. The appropriateness of exterior architectural features, including parking and loading spaces, which can be seen from a public street, alley, or walkway. 3. The general design, arrangement, texture, material, and color of the building or structure and the relation of such factors to similar features of buildings or structures in the District, contrast or other relation of such factors to other landmarks built at or during the same period, as well as the uniqueness of such features, considering the remaining examples of architectural, historical, and cultural values. The proposed demolition will not have an adverse effect on the overall character of the Old Town Overlay District as the structure proposed to be demolished is a noncontributing structure to the district. Since the future infill construction is not submitted for review as part of the request for demolition, Criterion H.2 and H.3 do not apply to this application. In addition to the approval criteria listed above, the HARC must also consider the following criteria for a request for CDC for Demolition or Relocation of a Historic Structure: SECTION 3.13.040 CRITERIA FINDINGS A. The uniqueness of the structure as a representative type of style of architecture, historic association, or other element of the original designation criteria applicable to such structure or tract; The Historic Resources Survey Form (Exhibit C) completed on May 14, 2014, describes the structure as having “no demonstrated historical significance or any unique architectural or design qualities.” The report indicates that the structure is not individually eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places or contributing to a National Register District. The structure is not deemed to be historically significant when evaluated against the National Register of Historic Places criteria. B. The condition of the structure from the standpoint of structure integrity and the extent of work necessary to stabilize the structure; and The current structure maintains its structural integrity; however, the structure and site requires additional extensive work to continue maintaining them. C. The status of the structure under Chapter 15 of The structure has not been evaluated by the Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report Historic and Architectural Review Commission CDC-2014-022 – 1912 South Church Street Page 6 of 7 SECTION 3.13.040 CRITERIA FINDINGS the Georgetown City Code containing Building Safety Standards and rules governing Dangerous Buildings. Chief Building Official and has not been determined to be a dangerous structure. Currently, there are no active Code Enforcement notices of violations on the structure. D. And make the following findings: (The applicant is required to satisfy one of the following criteria, not all of them) EITHER: 1. For a request to replace a structure with a new structure, it finds: a. The new structure is more appropriate and compatible with the historic overlay district than the structure to be demolished or relocated. b. The owner has the financial ability and intent to build the new structure. HARC must first approve the CDC, if required, for the new structure before it may consider the request for demolition or removal. The structure has lost all historic integrity due to the removal of portions of the structure, replacement of windows and doors and removal of historic building materials. The structure is non-contributing to the historic district and the removal of the structure will allow for a future project that will comply with the requirements for infill construction in the Old Town Overlay District. In addition, the applicant has expressed the intent to build the new structure by obtaining the services of a professional to draft the plans in compliance with the building guidelines (Exhibit D). OR: 5. For a request to demolish, replace, or relocate a structure for special circumstances, it finds: a. The new structure is more appropriate and compatible with the historic overlay district than the structure to be demolished or relocated. b. The owner has the financial ability and intent to build the new structure. HARC must first approve the CDC, if required, for the new structure before it may consider the request for demolition or removal. The structure has lost all historic integrity due to the removal of portions of the structure, replacement of windows and doors and removal of historic building materials. The structure is non-contributing to the historic district and the removal of the structure will allow for a future project that will comply with the requirements for infill construction in the Old Town Overlay District. In addition, the applicant has expressed the intent to build the new structure by obtaining the services of a professional to draft the plans in compliance with the building guidelines (Exhibit A). A CDC for the infill construction is not required unless the applicant wishes to exceed the site requirements outlined in UDC Section 4.09. Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report Historic and Architectural Review Commission CDC-2014-022 – 1912 South Church Street Page 7 of 7 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the HARC approve the proposed demolition of the structure located at 1912 South Church Street based upon the findings that the structure has lost all historic significance and is no longer a contributing structure to the district, as outlined in UDC Section 3.13.040.D.1 and the proposed structure will be more compatible with the historic district. Should the HARC approve the request, the documentation of the existing structure and post- demolition requirements of UDC Section 3.13.070 shall apply. Should the HARC deny the request, the demolition delay process outlined in UDC Section 3.13.010.D.2 shall apply. Any person aggrieved by the final action of the CDC has the option to appeal to City Council within thirty (30) days of the final action in accordance with UDC Section 3.13.0110. Recommended motion: “I move that the Historic and Architectural Review Commission approve CDC-2014-022, a request for a CDC for Demolition to demolish the structure located at 1912 South Church Street, based on the findings that that the request meets the criteria outlined in UDC Section 3.13.040.D.1 in that the existing structure has lost all historic significance, making it a non- contributing structure to the historic overlay district, and any new construction will be built in accordance with the Old Town Overlay District UDC standards, as intended by the applicant.” As of the date of this report, staff has received no written comments regarding this application. ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A – Applicant’s Letter of Intent Exhibit B – Current photos of the structure Exhibit C – Historic Resource Survey Form Exhibit D – Proposed site plan and floor plan for new construction SUBMITTED BY Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner PUBLIC COMMENTS HARC members, The intention of this letter is to describe the first step of the project that Laughlin Investments, LLC hopes to accomplish at 1912 Church Street. This first step is the demolition process and this letter is part of the demo request application. As you can see from the included photos and architectural survey, the house is not contributing to the neighborhood and the neighbors were actually very happy to hear that it might come down. Also, the house is in disrepair beyond what would make sense to renovate. If approved, I will demo the current house and build a new home, one that fits into the style of the neighborhood, in its place. The three existing pecans trees will stay intact. Plans are currently being worked on which will comply with all of the building guidelines. I am happy to answer any questions or provide any further documentation that is required. Kind regards, Lisa Laughlin The current condition of this structure is in bad shape. It is not safe or attractive. The neighbors were happy to hear that it might be torn down and replaced with a nice home. TEXAS HISTORICAL COMMISSION HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY FORM PROJECT # N/A Local ID R042249 County Williamson City Georgetown Address 1912 Church Street SECTION 1 Basic Inventory Current Name 1912 Church Street Historic Name 1912 Church Street Owner Information: Name Laughlin Investments LLC Status Click here to enter text. Address 9908 Bundoran Drive City Austin State Texas Zip 78717 Geographic Location: Latitude: 30°37'38.92"N Longitude: 97°40'27.64"W Legal Description (Lot/Block) Lots 1 & 2(PT), Block 7 Addition/Subdivision Eubank Addition Year 1895 Property Type: ☒Building ☐Structure ☐Object ☐Site ☐District Current Designations: ☐NR District (Is property contributing? ☐Yes ☐No) ☐NHL ☐NR ☐RTHL ☐OTHM ☐HTC ☐SAL ☐Local ☐Other Old Town Historic Overlay District Architect: Unknown Builder: Unknown Construction Date: 1947 ☒Actual ☐Estimated Source: Williamson Central Appraisal District Function Current Use: ☐Agriculture ☐Commerce/trade ☐Defense ☒Domestic ☐Educational ☐Government ☐Healthcare ☐Industry/Processing ☐Recreation/Culture ☐Religious ☐Social ☐Vacant ☐Other: Click here to enter text. Historic Use: ☐Agriculture ☐Commerce/trade ☐Defense ☒Domestic ☐Educational ☐Government ☐Healthcare ☐Industry/Processing ☐Recreation/Culture ☐Religious ☐Social ☐Vacant ☐Other: Click here to enter text. Image Information Recorded by: Tara Dudley Date Recorded: May 14, 2014 Photo Data: ID# Click here to enter text. To: Click here to enter text. Primary Image ID: Click here to enter text. TEXAS HISTORICAL COMMISSION HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY FORM PROJECT # N/A Local ID R042249 County Williamson City Georgetown Address 1912 Church Street SECTION 2 Architectural Description General Architectural Description: 2-story rectangular plan, gable-roofed original garage apartment with Masonite siding; 1-story shed roof section at southeast appears to be a historic-age addition with roof overhang that forms partial gabled porch at entry; siding, windows, and doors have been replaced. The original main, front house has been demolished. ☒Additions, modifications, specify dates: historic-age shed roof addition with entry porch at southeast façade, date unknown; original, main front house demolished, date unknown ☐Relocated, specify date, former location and information of interest: Click here to enter text. Stylistic Influence(s) ☐Log traditional ☐Shingle ☐Gothic Revival ☐Pueblo Revival ☐International ☐Greek Revival ☐Romanesque Revival ☐Tudor Revival ☐Spanish Colonial ☐Post-war Modern ☐Italianate ☐Folk Victorian ☐Neo-Classical ☐Prairie ☐Ranch ☐Second Empire ☐Colonial Revival ☐Beaux Arts ☐Craftsman ☐Commercial Style ☐Eastlake ☐Renaissance Revival ☐Mission ☐Art Deco ☒No Style ☐Queen Anne ☐Exotic Revival ☐Monterey ☐Moderne ☐Other Structural Details Roof Form ☒Gable ☐Hipped ☐Gambrel ☒Shed ☐Flat w/ parapet ☐Mansard ☐Pyramidal Other: Click here to enter text. Roof Materials ☐Wood shingles ☐Tile ☐Composition Shingles ☒Metal ☐Other: Click here to enter text. Wall Materials ☐Brick ☐Stucco ☐Stone ☐Wood shingles ☐Log ☐Terra Cotta ☐Concrete ☐Metal: ☐Wood Siding ☒Siding: Other Masonite ☐Glass ☐Asbestos ☐Vinyl ☐Other: Click here to enter text. Windows ☐Fixed ☐Double Hung ☐Wood Sash ☒Metal Sash ☐Casement ☐Sliding ☐Decorative Screenwork Other: Single Hung Doors (Primary Entrance) ☒Single door ☐Double door ☐With transom ☐With sidelights ☐Other: Click here to enter text. Plan ☐L-plan ☐T-plan ☐Modified L-plan ☐2-room ☐Open ☐Center Passage ☐Bungalow ☐Shotgun ☐Irregular ☐Four Square ☒Rectangular ☐OtherClick here to enter text. # of Stories: 2 Basement: ☒None ☐Partial ☐Full Chimneys Specify # 0 ☐Interior ☐Exterior ☐Brick ☐Stone ☐Stucco ☐Corbelled Caps ☐Other: Click here to enter text. PORCHES/CANOPIES Form: ☐Shed Roof ☐Flat Roof ☐Hipped Roof ☒Gable Roof ☐Inset ☐Other: Click here to enter text. Support: ☐Wood posts (plain) ☐Wood posts (turned) ☐Masonry pier ☒Fabricated metal ☐Box columns ☐Classical columns ☐Tapered box supports ☐Suspension cables ☐Suspension rods ☐Spindlework ☐Jigsawn trim ☐Other: Click here to enter text. Materials: ☒Metal ☐Wood ☐Fabric ☐OtherClick here to enter text. Ancillary Buildings (specify # and type) 0 Garage Click here to enter text. Barn Click here to enter text. Shed Click here to enter text. Other: Click here to enter text. Landscape/Site Features ☐Sidewalks ☐Terracing ☒Drives ☐Well/cistern ☐Gardens ☐Other: Click here to enter text. ☐Stone ☐Wood ☐Concrete ☐Brick ☐Other materials: Click here to enter text. Landscape Notes: Click here to enter text. TEXAS HISTORICAL COMMISSION HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY FORM PROJECT # Click here to enter text. Local ID R042249 County Williamson City Georgetown Address 1912 Church Street SECTION 3 Historical Information Associated Historical Context: ☐Agriculture ☐Architecture ☐Arts ☐Commerce ☐Communication ☐Education ☐Exploration ☐Health ☐Immigration/Settlement ☐Law/Government ☐Military ☐Natural Resources ☐Planning/Development ☐Religion/Spirituality ☐Science/Technology ☐Social/Cultural ☐Transportation ☐Other: Click here to enter text. Applicable National Register (NR) Criteria: ☐A Associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad pattern of our history ☐B Associated with the lives of persons significant in our past ☐C Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period or method of construction or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic value, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components lack individual distinctions ☐D Has yielded, or is likely to yield, information important in prehistory of history Areas of Significance: Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Period(s) of Significance: Click here to enter text. Level of Significance: ☐National ☐State ☐Local Integrity: ☒Location ☒Design ☐Materials ☐Workmanship ☐Setting ☐Feeling ☐Association Integrity notes: The resource is a common form and does not have any exceptional character-defining features. The shed-roof portion of the existing house is a historic-age addition to an original garage apartment as evidenced by the change in roof form and examination of the foundation. The resulting house does not have any exceptional design elements. All of the windows and doors have been replaced. In addition, the Masonite siding is not original to the house; it covers asbestos siding and/or wood siding on some areas of the dwelling. The demolition of the original main house negatively impacts the building’s integrity of setting, feeling, and association. The property is not recognizable to its historic appearance. Individually Eligible? ☐Yes ☒No ☐Undetermined Within Potential NR District? ☐Yes ☒No ☐Undetermined Is Property Contributing? ☐Yes ☒No ☐Undetermined Priority: (see manual for definitions) ☐High ☐Medium ☒Low Explain: The property has no demonstrated historical significance or any unique architectural or design qualities. Other Information Is prior documentation available for this resource? ☐Yes ☒No ☐Unknown Type: ☐HABS ☐Survey ☐Other Documentation details Click here to enter text. Questions? Contact Survey Coordinator History Programs Division, Texas Historical Commission 512/463-5853 history@thc.state.tx.us version 3/2013 Site Plan for 1912 Church St. City of Georgetown, Texas SUBJECT: Conceptual design review for the historic structure located at 401 South Myrtle Street. ITEM SUMMARY: The property owner at 401 South Myrtle Street is requesting conceptual review for a residential remodel project, per Sections 2.03.010.C.1 and 2, and 3.13.020.B of the Unified Development Code. Staff is forwarding the request to the HARC for review. The conceptual review provides guidance and feedback to the applicant on the conceptual plans and applicable Design Guidelines. As no CDC application has been submitted with the city, no formal action will be taken by HARC in accordance with the UDC. The applicant may submit an application for a Certificate of Design Compliance upon completion of the conceptual review process, basing the design on guidance from the HARC. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. SUBMITTED BY: Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner ATTACHMENTS: Description Type 401 South Myrtle Street Concept Plan Backup Material The Elliott Residence 401 South Myrtle Street Georgetown, Texas REVIEW SET NOT FOR REGULATORY PERMITTING OR CONSTRUCTION CM 06.12.14 14049 06.16.14 A1PROPOSED PLAN 3/16" = 1'0" A1 1 MSTR. BDRM 13'5" X 15'9" 9' CLG. MSTR. BATH 9' CLG. W.I.C. 7'5" X 5'2" 9' CLG. DECK 14'8" X 5'0" HALL 9' CLG. UTIL. 5'7" X 9'0" 9' CLG. BRKFST. 9'4" X 10'0" 9' CLG. KITCHEN 16'0" X 10'0" 9' CLG. FAMILY 25'8" X 14'3" 9'-10' CLG. DINING 11'8" X 11'8" 9' CLG. FOYER 11'8" X 6'0" 9' CLG. HALL 9' CLG. BATH 9' CLG.BDRM. 2 13'4" X 13'5" 9' CLG. BDRM. 3 13'6" X 13'5" 9' CLG. W.I.C. 6'8" X 5'10" 9' CLG. W.I.C. 6'8" X 5'10" 9' CLG. OFFICE 10'7" X 11'8" 9' CLG. COV'D. PORCH 6'9" X 24'11" 8' CLG. 36" RANGE DBL. SINK FULL HGT. CBNT HOODCBNTS.CBNTS. 36" REF. D.W. COV'D. PORCH 6'6" X 12'6" 9' CLG. PATIO CBNTS. & ROD CBNTS. DRY. WASH. BRKFST. BAR @ 36" A.F.F. SHLVS. SHLVS.SHLVS. SH. & RD. SH. & RD. LIN. W.C. TUB/ SHWR.LAV.LAV. LIN. W.C. LAV.LAV. SEAT 42"X48" SHWR. SH. & RD. SH. & RD. The Elliott Residence 401 South Myrtle Street Georgetown, Texas REVIEW SET NOT FOR REGULATORY PERMITTING OR CONSTRUCTION CM 06.12.14 14049 06.16.14 A2NORTH ELEV. 3/16" = 1'0" A2 2 WEST ELEV. 3/16" = 1'0" A2 1 The Elliott Residence 401 South Myrtle Street Georgetown, Texas REVIEW SET NOT FOR REGULATORY PERMITTING OR CONSTRUCTION CM 06.12.14 14049 06.16.14 A3SOUTH ELEV. 3/16" = 1'0" A3 2 EAST ELEV. 3/16" = 1'0" A3 1 The Elliott Residence 401 South Myrtle Street Georgetown, Texas REVIEW SET NOT FOR REGULATORY PERMITTING OR CONSTRUCTION CM 06.12.14 14049 06.16.14 A4 EXSTG. SITE PLAN 3/16" = 1'0" A4 1 PROPOSED. SITE PLAN 3/16" = 1'0" A4 2 PROPOSED ROOF PLAN 3/16" = 1'0" A4 3 City of Georgetown, Texas SUBJECT: Conceptual design review for the historic structure located at 302 East 7th Street. ITEM SUMMARY: The property owner at 302 East 7th Street is requesting conceptual review for a residential remodel project, per Sections 2.03.010.C.1 and 2, and 3.13.020.B of the Unified Development Code. Staff is forwarding the request to the HARC for review. The conceptual review provides guidance and feedback to the applicant on the conceptual plans and applicable Design Guidelines. As no CDC application has been submitted with the city, no formal action will be taken by HARC in accordance with the UDC. The applicant may submit an application for a Certificate of Design Compliance upon completion of the conceptual review process, basing the design on guidance from the HARC. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None SUBMITTED BY: Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner ATTACHMENTS: Description Type 302 E 7th Conceptual Review Backup Material S M Y R T L E S T E 7 T H S T ±302 East 7th Street City of Georgetown, Texas SUBJECT: Update from Sign Subcommittee. ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: None SUBMITTED BY: Karen Frost, Recording Secretary City of Georgetown, Texas SUBJECT: Questions and comments from Commissioners in Training. ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: None SUBMITTED BY: Karen Frost, Recording Secretary City of Georgetown, Texas SUBJECT: Staff updates and reminder of future meetings. ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: None SUBMITTED BY: Karen Frost, Recording Secretary City of Georgetown, Texas SUBJECT: ITEM SUMMARY: FINANCIAL IMPACT: NA SUBMITTED BY: