HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda_HARC_05.22.2014Notice of Meeting for the
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
of the City of Georgetown
May 22, 2014 at 6:00 PM
at Council and Courts Building, 101 E. 7th Street Georgetown, TX 78626
The City of Georgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
If you require assistance in participating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the
ADA, reasonable assistance, adaptations, or accommodations will be provided upon request. Please
contact the City at least four (4) days prior to the scheduled meeting date, at (512) 930-3652 or City
Hall at 113 East 8th Street for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711.
Regular Session
(This Regular Session may, at any time, be recessed to convene an Executive Session for any purpose
authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code 551.)
A The Historic and Architectural Review Commission (HARC), appointed by the Mayor and the
City Council, is responsible for hearing and taking final action on Certificates of Design
Compliance applications based upon the City Council adopted Downtown and Old Town Design
Guidelines and Unified Development Code. The Commission may, at any time, recess the Regular
Session to convene an Executive Session at the request of the Chair, a Commissioner, the Director
or legal counsel for any purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code
Chapter 551.
Welcome and Meeting Procedures:
Staff Presentation
Applicant Presentation (Limited to ten minutes unless stated otherwise by the Commission)
Questions from Commission to Staff and Applicant
Comments from Citizens*
Applicant Response
Commission Deliberative Process
Commission Action
*Those who wish to speak must turn in a speaker form, located at the back of the room, to the
recording secretary before the item they wish to address begins. Each speaker will be permitted to
address the Commission one time only for a maximum of three minutes.
Legislative Regular Agenda
B Discussion and possible action to approve the minutes from the April 24, 2014 regular meeting.
C Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for
demolition for the structures located at 101 and 109 West 2nd Street bearing the legal description
of City of Georgetown, Block 2, Lots 2-4, & Pt Abandoned Rd, .582 acres, and Lots 5-7, (pt) 8 &
Abandoned Rd, .704 acres. (CDC-2014-019)
D Preservation Brief - "The National Register of Historic Places"
E Update from Sign Subcommittee.
F Briefing of Customer Bulletins 112: Certificate of Design Compliance Process, 113: Certificate of
Design Compliance for Demolition or Relocation of a Structure Process, and 114: Procedures for
completing and submitting a Certificate of Design Compliance Application (Submittal
Requirements).
G Information and discussion on the conversion to the paperless meeting format (digital agenda
packets).
H Questions and comments from Commissioners in Training.
I Staff updates and reminder of future meetings.
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
I, Jessica Brettle, City Secretary for the City of Georgetown, Texas, do hereby certify that this Notice
of Meeting was posted at City Hall, 113 E. 8th Street, a place readily accessible to the general public
at all times, on the ______ day of __________________, 2014, at __________, and remained so
posted for at least 72 continuous hours preceding the scheduled time of said meeting.
____________________________________
Jessica Brettle, City Secretary
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
The Historic and Architectural Review Commission (HARC), appointed by the Mayor and the
City Council, is responsible for hearing and taking final action on Certificates of Design
Compliance applications based upon the City Council adopted Downtown and Old Town Design
Guidelines and Unified Development Code. The Commission may, at any time, recess the Regular
Session to convene an Executive Session at the request of the Chair, a Commissioner, the Director
or legal counsel for any purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code
Chapter 551.
Welcome and Meeting Procedures:
Staff Presentation
Applicant Presentation (Limited to ten minutes unless stated otherwise by the Commission)
Questions from Commission to Staff and Applicant
Comments from Citizens*
Applicant Response
Commission Deliberative Process
Commission Action
*Those who wish to speak must turn in a speaker form, located at the back of the room, to the
recording secretary before the item they wish to address begins. Each speaker will be permitted to
address the Commission one time only for a maximum of three minutes.
ITEM SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None
SUBMITTED BY:
Karen Frost, Recording Secretary
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Discussion and possible action to approve the minutes from the April 24, 2014 regular meeting.
ITEM SUMMARY:
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None.
SUBMITTED BY:
Karen Frost, Recording Secretary
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Minutes of April 24, 2014 Backup Material
Historic and Architectural Review Commission Page 1 of 3
Meeting: April 24, 2014
City of Georgetown, Texas
Historic and Architectural Review Commission Meeting
Minutes
Thursday, April 24, 2014 at 6:00 p.m.
Council and Courts Building
101 E. 7th Street, Georgetown, TX 78626
Members present: Anna Eby, Chair; Nancy Knight, Vice- Chair; Jennifer Brown; David Paul; Richard
Mee, Ty Gibson, and Mary Jo Winder.
Commissioners in Training present: Rodolfo Martinez
Commissioners absent: Barbara Price (CIT)
Staff present: Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner; Andreina Davila, Project Coordinator; Bridget Chapman,
City Attorney; Jack Daly, Executive Assistant; Laurie Brewer, Assistant City Manager.
Call to Order by Eby at 6:00 p.m. with the reading of the meeting procedures.
* Those who speak must turn in a speaker form, located at the back of the room, to the recording
secretary before the item that they wish to address begins. Each speaker will be permitted to address the
Commission one time only for a maximum of three (3) minutes.
This Regular Session may, at any time, be recessed to convene an Executive Session for any purpose
authorized by the Open Meeting Act, Texas Government Code 551.
Legislative Agenda:
A. Consideration and possible approval of the revised minutes of the March 27, 2014 regular meeting.
Eby explained the correction that needed to be made to the minutes, in regards to the number of
votes needed for an action to be approved.
Motion by Mee to approve the minutes as presented with the noted changes. Second by Paul.
Approved 7 -0.
B. Preservation Brief – The Historic Preservation Commission’s Role in Historic Preservation.
Synatschk presented the report and discussed how historic preservation commissions can be positive,
proactive community partners, and not just regulatory bodies.
C. Public hearing and possible action on a Certificate of Design Compliance Request for Exterior
Alterations and New Construction (Addition) at Glasscok Edition, Block 5, Lot 1, .16 acres, located at
902 Forest Street. (CDC-2014-010
Synatschk presented the staff report. The applicant is requesting a CDC for a 320 square foot
addition to a medium priority structure in the downtown overlay district. Hardy siding and a
dropped roofline will be used for differentiation. Additionally, an old addition will have a gabled
roof added. Staff suggests that the rafter tails from the original addition be retained for
differentiation.
Eby opened the Public Hearing and closed it with no speakers coming forth.
Winder asked if the about the wall on the north elevation and the applicant clarified that the west
elevation will be changed and all the windows that are to be removed will be added to the addition.
Historic and Architectural Review Commission Page 2 of 3
Meeting: April 24, 2014
Motion by Knight to approve the CDC as submitted, with the condition that the old addition
retains the current size and pitch of the rafter tails. Second by Mee. Approved 7 – 0.
D. Discussion and review of the Texas Open Meetings Act and meeting procedures.
Bridget Chapman, the City Attorney, gave a presentation on the Texas Open Meetings Act and
meeting procedures. She highlighted that all City Boards and Commissions are established via the
City Charter, and act in an advisory capacity to the City Council. HARC is specifically established in
Title 2, Section 2.50 of the Code of Ordinances. Section 2.50 outlines the membership qualifications
and the powers and duties of HARC. Chapman briefly reviewed the commission’s by-laws. Within
the by-laws are meeting procedures. Chapman explained about the Texas Open Meeting Act, and
that the commission should be careful not to violate these rules by creating “walking quorums” or
hitting reply-all when emailing.
Finally, she clarified when it is appropriate to table. Typically tabling is used within the same
meeting, to pause and resume discussion. If an item needs to be postponed, either an applicant needs
to request continuance to a date certain, or the commission needs to deny the application and clarify
for the applicant what needs to be provided for reconsideration.
The commissioners had several questions for Chapman regarding the appeal process and amending
the design guidelines. Staff agreed to hold workshops at the next meeting regarding the demolition
process, the appeal process, and how to amend the design guidelines.
Motion by Knight to place an item on the agenda to discuss demolitions and appeals. Second by
Mee. Approved 7-0.
E. Questions and comments from Commissioners in Training.
Rodolfo Martinez said that it was good to clarify the appeal process.
F. Reminder of upcoming meetings related to HARC.
Synatschk reported the Sign Subcommittee will meet on May 12th at 4:00 p.m. The regular
commission will meet on May 22nd at 6:00 p.m. There will be a workshop at 5:00 p.m. regarding
procedures. The City will not be hosting the National Association of Preservation Commissions
(NAPC) conference in 2016. The chief concern of the association was that the conference center was
not built yet. The Downtown Master Plan passed second reading and has been formally adopted by
the City Council. An official report regarding the commission’s New Braunfels trips is being drafted
and will be submitted to the City Manager. Finally, HARC will be moving to electronic packets in the
near future.
Synatschk also gave update of previous CDCs: CDC-2013-046, Sweet lemon Inn, is now open and
CDC-2013-054, 108 W. 8th Street, is nearing completion of their expanded sidewalk.
Adjournment. Motion by Knight to adjourn. Second by Wnder. Meeting adjourned at 7:15 p.m.
________________________________ __________________________________
Approved, Anna Eby, Chair Attest, Nancy Knight
Historic and Architectural Review Commission Page 3 of 3
Meeting: April 24, 2014
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for
demolition for the structures located at 101 and 109 West 2nd Street bearing the legal description
of City of Georgetown, Block 2, Lots 2-4, & Pt Abandoned Rd, .582 acres, and Lots 5-7, (pt) 8 &
Abandoned Rd, .704 acres. (CDC-2014-019)
ITEM SUMMARY:
The City of Georgetown is in receipt of a request for a CDC for demolition of two historic
properties located within the Downtown Historic Overlay District. According to the submitted
letter of intent, the applicant wishes to demolish the structures in preparation for future
development.
Staff recommends approval of the request based on the findings that the request meets the
approval criteria of Sections 3.13.030 and 3.13.040 of the Unified Development Code (UDC), as
outlined in the attached Staff Report.
The affirmative vote of the majority of the HARC members is required to approve the CDC
request.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None. The applicant has paid the required fees.
SUBMITTED BY:
Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
CDC-2014-019 Staff Report Backup Material
CDC-2014-019 Exhibit A Backup Material
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-019 – 101 and 109 West 2nd St Page 1 of 7
Meeting Date: May 22, 2014 Agenda Item: B
File Number: CDC-2014-019
AGENDA ITEM DESCRIPTION
Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Certificate of Design Compliance (CDC) for
demolition for the structures located at 101 and 109 West 2nd Street bearing the legal description of City
of Georgetown, Block 2, Lots 2-4, & Pt Abandoned Rd, .582 acres, and Lots 5-7, (pt) 8 & Abandoned Rd,
.704 acres.
AGENDA ITEM DETAILS
Project Name: 101 and 109 West Second Street Demolition
Applicant: Austin Pfiester
Property Owner: WAAPF, Inc.
Property Address: 101 and 109 West 2nd Street
Legal Description: City of Georgetown, Block 2, Lots 2-4, & Pt Abandoned Rd, .582 acres, and Lots
5-7, (pt) 8 & Abandoned Rd, .704 acres.
Historic Overlay: Downtown, Area 2
Case History: This is the first review and public hearing for the case
HISTORIC CONTEXT
Date of construction: 101 West 2nd Street – Ca 1910
109 West 2nd Street - 1962
Historic Resources Survey Level of Priority: 101 West 2nd Street – Low (1984 and 2007 surveys)
109 West 2nd Street – Low (2007 survey)
National Register Designation: Neither property is eligible for listing in the National
Register
Texas Historical Commission Designation: Neither property has a state designation
APPLICANT’S REQUEST
The applicant seeks approval from the Historic and Architectural Review Commission (“HARC”) for a
Certificate of Design Compliance (“CDC”) for Demolition to demolish the historic structures located at
101 and 109 West 2nd Street. The existing structures are identified as a Low priority structure on the
1984 and 2007 Historic Resources Survey. The applicant wishes to demolish the existing structures to
facilitate future development of the site (see Exhibit A). The applicant seeks approval for the CDC to
replace the existing structure with a new structure that is more appropriate and compatible with the
historic overlay district (UDC Section 3.13.020 D (2) a) and under other special circumstances (UDC
Section 3.13.020 D (2) e).
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-019 – 101 and 109 West 2nd St Page 2 of 7
APPLICABLE DESIGN GUIDELINES
The following guidelines are applicable to the proposed scope of work in accordance with the adopted
Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines:
GUIDELINES FINDINGS
Not applicable The Design Guidelines do not address
criteria for demolition. Any future
development will be submitted to the HARC
for CDC approval.
STAFF ANALYSIS
The properties subject to this request are generally located at the northeast corner of Austin Avenue
and West 2nd Street. 101 West 2nd Street consists of an approximate 1,100-square foot brick and asbestos
shingle clad single family detached structure from the early 20th century and accessory buildings. The
primary structure is currently in use as a residence, with the accessory building utilized for storage.
109 West 2nd Street consists of an approximate 1,500-square foot stone clad single family detached
structure, and an accessory structure. The structures on the subject site include the ranch style house
with a field stone veneer and an accessory structure. The primary structure is currently in use as a
residence, with the accessory building utilized for storage.
In accordance with Section 3.13.D.1 of the Unified Development Code (“UDC”), “No building or
structure within the Downtown Overlay District, Old Town Overlay District or any other Historic
Overlay District or on the List of Priority Structures shall be demolished or relocated unless such
demolition or relocation is approved by the Historic and Architectural Review Commission and a
Certificate of Design Co mpliance for such demolition has been granted. However, this authority shall
not supersede the Building Official’s authority under Chapter 15.40, “Dangerous Building Ordinance,”
of the Georgetown Municipal Code.” The subject property is located within the Downtown Overlay
District, requiring an approved CDC for Demolition prior to demolition.
UDC Section 3.13.010.D details the applicability requirements for a CDC for Demolition. In accordance
with the UDC, the Demolition Subcommittee was appointed on December 12, 2013. The subcommittee
met with the applicant and conducted a site visit of the subject property on Monday, February 24, 2014,
to establish the minimum requirements for application submittal. According to the submitted
application, the applicant is requesting a CDC for Demolition pursuant to Section 3.13.020.D.1.a: To
replace the structure with a new structure that is more appropriate and compatible with the historic
overlay district; and Section 3.13.020D.1.e: Other special circumstances, as described and justified by
the applicant.
The ca. 1910 structure is identified as a Low priority historic structure on the 1984 and 2007 Historic
Resources Survey. The 1962 structure was not listed in the 1984 survey; however, it was identified as a
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-019 – 101 and 109 West 2nd St Page 3 of 7
low priority structure in the 2007 survey. The survey lists the following information regarding Low
priority structures:
Properties categorized as LOW are neither individually eligible for listing in the NRHP nor
potentially contributing resources within a historic district. The baseline consideration for
determining the preservation priority was age; non-historic age properties located within a
historic district were automatically assigned a LOW preservation priority. Resources of historic
age were considered LOW priority if they could not be associated with a significant
architectural style, building form, construction method, or trend in local history. Also, resources
of historic age that had been severely altered to the extent that their architectural and historic
associations were no longer understandable, or that new alterations overwhelmed the visual
interpretation of the original or historic appearance, were assigned a LOW priority.
The Historic Resources Survey Form, completed by an architect satisfying the Secretary of the Interior’s
Professional Qualification Standards for Architectural Historian, indicates the structures are not eligible
for individual listing in the National Register of Historic Places, nor considered a contributing structure
to a National Register district. (Exhibit A)
CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL
In accordance with Section 3.13.030 of the Unified Development Code, the HARC must consider the
following criteria:
SECTION 3.13.030 CRITERIA FINDINGS
A. The application is complete and the
information contained within the application
is correct and sufficient enough to allow
adequate review and final action;
The application complies with this requirement.
The HARC Demolition Subcommittee
established the minimum application
requirements for submittal of the CDC
application at its February 24, 2014 Pre-
Application Meeting. In addition to the
information required in the UDC, the
Demolition Subcommittee requested the
following supplemental application
requirements:
1. A Historic Resources Survey Form, to be
completed by a consultant satisfying the
Secretary of the Interior’s Professional
Qualifications Standards.
The CDC for Demolition application was
received on April 22, 2014, and deemed
complete on April 28, 2014.
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-019 – 101 and 109 West 2nd St Page 4 of 7
SECTION 3.13.030 CRITERIA FINDINGS
B. Compliance with any design standards of the
Unified Development Code;
Not applicable to this case.
The UDC’s design guidelines do not apply to
the demolition of an existing structure. The
proposed structure and any future development
on site will require the submittal and review of
applicable development applications (Site Plan,
etc.) in accordance with the UDC. Review of
applicable development applications will
include the review of the proposed scope of
work to ensure compliance with all design and
development standards as specified in the UDC.
C. Compliance with the adopted Downtown
Design Guidelines, as may be amended from
time to time, specific to the applicable Historic
or Overlay District;
Not applicable.
The proposed structure will require approval of
a CDC for Infill prior to any post-demolition
work. The Demolition Subcommittee did not
require CDC approval for the new structure as
part of the CDC for Demolition process.
D. The integrity of an individual historic
structure is preserved.
The application complies with this requirement.
The approved CDC will result in the removal of
Low priority historic structures; however, the
structures are not eligible for additional historic
designations due to lack of historic integrity.
E. New buildings or additions are designed to be
compatible with surrounding historic
properties.
Not applicable to this case.
The scope of work subject to this CDC
application is for demolition only and does not
include the review of new infill construction or
additions to an existing structure. In accordance
with the UDC, the new project will be submitted
for HARC conceptual review and CDC for Infill
review at a later date.
F. The overall character of the Historic or
applicable Overlay District is protected.
The application complies with the requirement.
The existing structure has been deemed a
noncontributing structure to the district. Thus,
removal of the structure will not have an
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-019 – 101 and 109 West 2nd St Page 5 of 7
SECTION 3.13.030 CRITERIA FINDINGS
adverse effect on the character of the Downtown
Overlay District.
G. Signs that are out of keeping with the adopted
design standards, and are not in character
with the site or landmarks within the Historic
or applicable Overlay District in question will
not be permitted.
Not Applicable.
The CDC application does not include any
signage for review. Therefore, this criterion does
not apply.
H. The following may also be considered by the
HARC when determining whether to approve
a Certificate for Design Compliance:
1. The effect of the proposed change upon
the general historic, cultural, and
architectural nature of the site, landmark,
or District.
2. The appropriateness of exterior
architectural features, including parking
and loading spaces, which can be seen
from a public street, alley, or walkway.
3. The general design, arrangement, texture,
material, and color of the building or
structure and the relation of such factors to
similar features of buildings or structures
in the District, contrast or other relation of
such factors to other landmarks built at or
during the same period, as well as the
uniqueness of such features, considering
the remaining examples of architectural,
historical, and cultural values.
The application complies with this requirement.
The proposed demolition will not have an
adverse effect on the overall character of the
Downtown Overlay District as the structure
proposed to be demolished is a noncontributing
structure to the district. The district is composed
primarily of late 19th and 20th century historic
commercial buildings, so the removal of the
single family detached residence has little
impact. Since the future infill construction is not
submitted for review as part of the request for
demolition, Criterion H.2 and H.3 do not apply
to this application.
In addition to the approval criteria listed above, the HARC must also consider the following criteria for
a request for CDC for Demolition or Relocation of a Historic Structure:
SECTION 3.13.040 CRITERIA FINDINGS
A. The uniqueness of the structure as a
representative type of style of architecture,
historic association, or other element of the
original designation criteria applicable to such
structure or tract;
The Historic Resources Survey Form (Exhibit A)
completed on April 4, 2014, describes the
structures as “isolated example of vernacular
residential construction allowed to deteriorate
to point it would be extremely difficult to
preserve.” The report indicates that the
structures are not individually eligible for listing
in the National Register of Historic Places or
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-019 – 101 and 109 West 2nd St Page 6 of 7
SECTION 3.13.040 CRITERIA FINDINGS
contributing to a National Register District. The
structure is not deemed to be historically
significant when evaluated against the National
Register of Historic Places criteria.
B. The condition of the structure from the
standpoint of structure integrity and the extent
of work necessary to stabilize the structure;
and
The current structures maintain its structural
integrity; however, the structures and sites
require additional extensive work to continue
maintaining them. In addition, the ca 1910
original structure and two additions have
deteriorated to a condition requiring significant
renovations.
C. The status of the structure under Chapter 15 of
the Georgetown City Code containing
Building Safety Standards and rules governing
Dangerous Buildings.
The structure has not been evaluated by the
Chief Building Official and has not been
determined to be a dangerous structure.
Currently, there are no active Code Enforcement
notices of violations on either structure.
D. And make the following findings:
(The applicant is required to satisfy one of the following criteria, not all of them)
EITHER:
1. For a request to replace a structure with a
new structure, it finds:
a. The new structure is more
appropriate and compatible with
the historic overlay district than
the structure to be demolished or
relocated.
b. The owner has the financial ability
and intent to build the new
structure. HARC must first
approve the CDC, if required, for
the new structure before it may
consider the request for demolition
or removal.
The Downtown Overlay District is primarily
comprised of late 19th and 20th century
commercial structures. While some residences
remain on the edges of the district, many of
them have been converted to retail, offices or
other commercial space. The proposed new
development is compatible with the district, and
is supported by the Downtown Master Plan for
the redevelopment of the Downtown Overlay
District. The HARC Demolition Subcommittee
did not require the applicant to apply for a CDC
for Infill for the new project prior to
consideration of the CDC for Demolition
application.
OR:
5. For a request to demolish, replace, or
relocate a structure for special
circumstances, it finds:
a. The new structure is more appropriate
The single family detached residences are
considered noncontributing structures to the
District, and are not the preferred development
model for the Downtown Overlay District. The
Design Goals for Area 2 of the Downtown
Overlay District call for designing street edge
Downtown and Community Services Department Staff Report
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
CDC-2014-019 – 101 and 109 West 2nd St Page 7 of 7
SECTION 3.13.040 CRITERIA FINDINGS
and compatible with the historic
overlay district than the structure to be
demolished or relocated.
b. The owner has the financial ability
and intent to build the new
structure. HARC must first
approve the CDC, if required, for
the new structure before it may
consider the request for demolition
or removal.
developments that convey a sense of pedestrian
scale and minimize the impact of automobiles.
The current structure fails to achieve the design
goals for Area 2 and does not support the
concepts outlined in the Downtown Master
Plan. The planned high density development
with restaurant, retail and commercial space on
the first floor is more appropriate for the
Downtown Overlay District.
Additionally, the structure at 101 West 2nd
Street is severely altered from its historic
footprint, with a significant loss of historic
integrity. Rehabilitation of the structure presents
significant challenges for the property owner.
The letter provided by Hogan Demolition
indicates the condition of the structure does not
allow for moving the structure to an alternate
location.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the HARC make their findings based on the required approval criteria of UDC
Sections 3.13.030 and 3.13.040. Should the HARC approve the request, the documentation of the
existing structure and post-demolition requirements of UDC Section 3.13.070 shall apply. Should the
HARC deny the request, the demolition delay process outlined in UDC Section 3.13.010.D.2 shall apply.
Any person aggrieved by the final action of the CDC has the option to appeal to City Council within
thirty (30) days of the final action in accordance with UDC Section 3.13.0110.
As of the date of this report, staff has received no written comments regarding this application.
ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit A – Applicant’s Letter of Intent and supporting documentation
SUBMITTED BY
Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Owned by WAAPF Properties, LLC
Demolition Request for
101 & 109 W 2nd St
Georgetown, TX
•Property is subject to
both historic and
downtown overlay
•Property zoning is
MU-DT (mixed use
downtown) and
single family is not
allowed for any new
construction on the
site
•Cannot build a home
on this site
101 & 109 W 2nd St
Austin Avenue
101 W 2nd St House
•Low Priority on
Historic Resources
Survey
•Historical Survey
attached…”extremely
difficult to preserve.”
•Also includes original
1984 historical
survey….”severely
altered.”
109 W 2nd St House
•Low Priority on
Historic Resources
Survey
•Historical Survey
attached…not
possible or
contribution to NR
•Ranch style house
built in 1962 (WCAD)
Unlikely to successfully
relocate 101 W2nd
Street House
•Asked a company
that has a specialty in
reclaiming older
homes for potential to
relocate
•In part due to
significant changes to
the house it would be
difficult to maintain
the integrity of the
structure
Future Improvements
•Site in historic overlay
district, so any new
improvements will
have to be approved
by HARC.
•Asking for demolition
now without new site
plan is due to high
soft costs associated
with designing a new
project. We would like
to know now about
demolition so we can
design our future site
plan accordingly.
Sample conceptual site
plan showing higher
density required of
MU-DT zoning
GROUND LEVEL
AU
S
T
I
N
A
V
E
2ND STREET
29
0
’
40’
Future Improvements
•These 3 floors of a
conceptual design are
just for illustrative
purposes only. Meant
to show the level of
density required of
MU-DT zoning.
•They were designed
for these 2 lots, with a
mix of commercial on
the ground floor and
multi-family use on
ground, second and
third floor.
Sample conceptual site
plan showing higher
density required of
MU-DT zoning
SECOND LEVEL
AU
S
T
I
N
A
V
E
2ND STREET
29
0
’
40’
Future Improvements
•Just design
costs(architectural,
civil, structural) for
the minimum
required
improvements will
cost several hundred
thousand dollars.
Before spending this
large a commitment
want to ensure we
know the allowable
footprint to build on.
Sample conceptual site
plan showing higher
density required of
MU-DT zoning
THIRD LEVEL
AU
S
T
I
N
A
V
E
2ND STREET
29
0
’
40’
101 & 109 W 2101 & 109 W 2101 & 109 W 2101 & 109 W 2ndndndnd StreetStreetStreetStreet
•Both homes low priority on the historical survey, and the older home (101)
has been significantly altered from its original construction. No longer has
the same windows, porch, siding, or trim. All that remains from original
construction is the footprint, which has also been altered.
•Asking for demolition permit now before new site permit because of high
soft costs associated with designing according to MU-DT zoning.
•Any new site work must still be approved by HARC, so this is only the first
step in the future life of the property.
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Preservation Brief - "The National Register of Historic Places"
ITEM SUMMARY:
Staff will present training on the National Register of Historic Places and evaluation criteria
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
NA
SUBMITTED BY:
Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
The National Register of Historic Places Backup Material
National Register Bulletin 15 - "How to Apply the National
Register Criteria for Evaluation"
Backup Material
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Background photo: Cranston Street
Armory, Providence, RI (Jack Boucher,
HABS). Bottom photos, left to right:
Philadelphia Toboggan Company Carousel
#6, Burlington, CO (NHL collection);
Archeologist excavating at the Jamestown
National Historic Site, Jamestown Island,
VA (Sarah Pope); Windsor Covered Bridge,
Windsor, VT (NHL Collection); Lolo Trail,
Nez Perce National Historical Park, Lolo
Hot Springs vie, ID (NHL collection);
Madison Historic District, Madison, IN
(Jack Boucher, HABS).
NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
1849 C STREET, N.W., MS 2280
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20240
WWW.CR.NPS.GOV/NR
EXPERIENCE YOUR AMERICA
THE
NATIONAL
REGISTER
OF HISTORIC
PLACES
!
¡V=
U7u
Ml
««• •
-•• «I
««« m
*m* - 111 jj '"^^1
• ¡Si
THE NATIONAL REGISTER
OF HISTORIC PLACES
The National Register of Historic Places is the
official list of the Nation's historic places
worthy of preservation. Authorized under the National
Historic Preservation Act of 1966, it is part of a national
program to coordinate and support public and private
efforts to identify, evaluate, and protect our historic and
archeological resources. The National Register is adminis-
tered by the National Park Service under the Secretary of
the Interior.
Properties listed in the National Register include
districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects that are
significant in American history, architecture, archeology,
engineering, and culture. The National Register includes:
• all historic areas in the National Park System;
• National Historic Landmarks that have been desig-
nated by the Secretary of the Interior for their signifi-
cance to all Americans; and
• properties significant to the Nation, State, or commu-
nity which have been nominated by State historic
preservation offices, Federal agencies, and Tribal
preservation offices, and have been approved by the
National Park Service.
America's historic places embody our unique spirit,
character and identity. Representing important historical
trends and events, reflecting the lives of significant per-
sons, illustrating distinctive architectural, engineering, and
artistic design achievement, and imparting information
about America's past, historic places tell compelling stories
of the Nation, and of the States and communities through-
out the country. The National Register helps preserve these
significant historic places by recognizing this irreplaceable
heritage. Its primary goals are to foster a national preserva-
tion ethic; promote a greater appreciation of America's
heritage; and increase and broaden the public's under-
standing and appreciation of historic places.
The National Register entourages citizens,
public agencies, ana" private organizations
to recognize and use the places of our past
to create livable and viable communities far the future.
Opposite: Scotty's Castle, Death Valley National Park, CA
(Jack Boucher, HABS)
CONTENTS
National Recognition..^
Results of Listing in the National Register...7
Preservation Assistance...8
The National Register as a Planning Tool...11
Nominations and Listing Procedures...14
Evaluating Properties for Listing
in the National Register...20
Determinations of Eligibility...22
National Historic Landmarks...24
Research, Education, Tourism and
Technical Assistance...26
Quick Reference...30
2
1 H '
1 1
Monadnock Mills Historic District, Claremont, NH
(New Hampshire State historic preservation office)
3
'7 don't think without the National Register designation of
the Warehouse district we could have gotten the investor
interest and the interest of public officials in taking a bunch of
old buildings that people were knocking down for parking lots
and turning them into a vibrant retail, residential, and office
district." (Hunter Morrison, City of Cleveland Planning Office)
NATIONAL RECOGNITION
Listing properties in the National Register often
changes the way communities perceive their
historic places, and strengthens the credibility of efforts
by private citizens and public officials to preserve these
resources as living parts of our communities. Listing
honors a property by recognizing its importance to its
community, State, or the Nation. The National Register,
which recognizes the values of properties as diverse as a
dugout shelter of an Oklahoma pioneer settler, the
Breakers Mansion in Newport, and a 12,000-year-old
prehistoric site, has helped many citizens to appreciate the
richness and variety of the Nation's heritage.
Cleveland Warehouse Historic District, Cleveland, OH
(Karen Borland, Sandvick Architects)
O ne of the most common questions that property
owners have about the National Register is, "Will
there be restrictions on my property after listing?" Owners
of private property listed in the National Register have no
obligation to open their properties to the public, to restore
them, or even to maintain them, if they choose not do so.
Owners can do anything they wish with their property
provided that no Federal license, permit, or funding is
involved. For the private property owner, Federal funding
for historic buildings usually comes in the form of Federal
tax credits for rehabilitation. Owners of National Register
properties who choose to participate in the preservation
tax incentive program must follow the Secretary of the
Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and receive approval
by the National Park Service of the rehabilitation project in
order to receive the tax credit.
Local historical commissions, design review commit-
tees, or special zoning ordinances are established by State
legislation or local ordinances, and are not part of the
National Park Service's National Register program. The
State Historic Preservation Officer and the mayor, city
council or other community officials can provide informa-
tion on any State or local law which may affect a historic
property.
Results of Listing
in the National Register
• Listing in the National Register honors the property
by recognizing its importance to its community, State,
or the Nation.
• Federal agencies, whose projects affect a listed prop-
erty, must give the Advisory Council on Historic Pres-
ervation an opportunity to comment on the project
and its effects on the property. See "Federal
Activities" on page 11.
• Owners of listed properties may be able to obtain
Federal historic preservation funding, when funds are
available. In addition, Federal investment tax credits
for rehabilitation and other provisions may apply.
• Owners of private property listed in the National
Register have no obligation to open their properties
to the public, to restore them, or even to maintain
them, if they choose not do so. Owners can do
anything they wish with their property
provided that no Federal license,
permit, or funding is involved.
PRESERVATION ASSISTANCE
Private preservation efforts, spurred by the honor of
National Register listing and made feasible by financial
incentives, have resulted in a rise in the value of historic prop-
erty and in the creation of construction, business, and employ-
ment opportunities throughout the Nation. Documentation
used for evaluating and registering historic properties is the
basis for decisions about which properties merit tax incentives
or available Federal, and, in some cases, State and local assis-
tance, and how these properties should be treated to respect
their historic character.
Federal Tax Incentives for Rehabilitation. Since 1976, the
Federal Internal Revenue Code has contained a variety of
incentives to encourage capital investment in historic buildings
and to spur revitalization of historic properties. These incen-
tives, including a 20% investment tax credit, encourage the
preservation of historic commercial, industrial, and rental
residential buildings listed in the National Register by allowing
favorable tax treatments for rehabilitation and dis-
couraging destruction of historic properties.
Owners of National Register properties who
choose to participate in the preserva-
tion tax incentive program must
follow the Secretary of the
Interior's Standards for
Rehabilitation and receive
approval by the National
Park Service of
the rehabilitation project in order to receive the tax credit.
Information about the Federal Historic Preservation tax
incentives program is on the Web at <www.cr.nps.gov/hps/
tps/tax/>, or can be obtained by contacting Federal
Historic Preservation Tax Incentives at the address listed in
the "Quick Reference" section on p. 30 of this brochure.
Information about this program can also be obtained by
contacting your State historic preservation office. Infor-
mation on obtaining the address and phone number for
your State historic preservation office is also found under
the "Quick Reference" section on p. 30.
Easement Donations. The Federal Internal Revenue
Code also provides for Federal income, estate, and gift tax
deductions for charitable contributions of partial interests
in real property (land and buildings). Taxpayers' gifts of
qualified interests must be "exclusively for conservation
purposes." One of these purposes is defined as "the preser-
vation of an historically important land area or certified
historic structure." Further information on easements may
be obtained from the sources listed above in the rehabilita-
tion tax incentives section.
Federal Historic Preservation Grants. Owners of
National Register listed properties may be able to obtain
Federal historic preservation funding, when funds are
available. Information about Federal historic preservation
grant assistance is available on the Web at <www.cr.nps.
gov/grants.htm> or by contacting your State historic
preservation office. Information on obtaining the address
and phone number for your State historic preservation
office is found under the "Quick Reference" section on
p. 30 of this brochure.
State Historic Preservation Grants and Tax
Programs. States also administer State grant
assistance programs and many of them
allow for property tax abatements
and State income tax credits for rehabilitated historic
properties. Information about State administered historic
preservation grant assistance, property tax abatement, and
State income tax credit programs may be obtained by con-
tacting the appropriate State historic preservation office.
Information on obtaining the address and phone number
for your State historic preservation office is found under
the "Quick Reference" section on p. 30.
"Many New Mexico communities are facing new develop-
ment which, although it may be welcome from an economic
perspective, will mean change. At the same time, local offi-
cials and private citizens are thinking more about preserving
buildings, structures, roadway corridors, archeological sites
and places where 'important things' happened or may yet
happen, before they disappear. Through careful planning,
new development can proceed and New Mexico's cultural
heritage can be preserved." (Excerpt from Grass Roots Preservation,
published by the New Mexico Historic Preservation Division)
THE NATIONAL REGISTER AS A
PRESERVATION PLANNING TOOL
I nformation gathered during identification, evalua-
tion, and registration is important in identifying
preservation needs and in planning protection strategies
for historic places on a Federal, State, and local level.
Federal Activities
Federal agencies are required by law to locate,
inventory, and nominate to the National Register historic
properties in Federal ownership or control. The Federal
agencies also are responsible for preserving historic prop-
erties under their ownership or control and for assuring
that any property that might qualify for inclusion in the
National Register is not inadvertently transferred, sold,
demolished, substantially altered, or allowed to deteriorate
significantly. If, as a result of Federal action or assistance, a
historic property is to be substantially altered or demol-
ished, records are to be made for deposit in the Library
of Congress or other agency designated by
the Secretary of the Interior, for
future use and reference.
10
»
Otowi Historic District, San Ildefonso vie, N
(Los Alamos Scientific Lab, Santa Fe, NM)
Agencies proposing projects that may affect a property
listed in or eligible for the National Register must allow the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (an independent
Federal agency that provides a forum for influencing
Federal activities, programs, and policies as they affect his-
toric resources) an opportunity to comment prior to fund-
ing, licensing or granting assistance on such projects. The
law does not mandate preservation by the Federal agency
and its purpose is not to impede or halt development.
Rather this process assures that the value of historic prop-
erties is given direct consideration in project planning
decisions. For more information on this process, go to the
following Web site <www.achp.gov>, or contact the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation at the address
given in the "Quick Reference" section on p. 30.
Consideration of historic values is also a part of the
decision to issue a surface coal mining permit, in accor-
dance with the Surface Mining and Control Act of 1977.
State and Tribal Activities
In addition to nominating historic properties to the
National Register, the State Historic Preservation Officer
prepares and implements a comprehensive Statewide
Historic Preservation Plan, administers the State program
of Federal assistance for historic preservation within the
State, conducts a statewide survey of historic
properties, assists in administering the Federal
preservation tax incentives,
and cooperates with
Federal, State, and
local officials and others to assure that historic properties
listed in or eligible for the National Register are taken into
consideration at all levels of planning and development.
The State Historic Preservation Officer also provides
public information, education and training, and technical
assistance relating to the Federal and State historic pres-
ervation programs. Tribal Historic Preservation Officers
perform the same type of preservation planning activities
as those performed by the State Historic Preservation
Officers. These activities, however, are associated with
historic properties located on Tribal lands.
Local Activities
Local governments can receive Federal assistance for
their preservation activities by obtaining Certified Local
Government status from the National Park Service and the
appropriate State historic preservation office. Certified
Local Governments receive small matching grants and
technical assistance from the National Park Service and the
State historic preservation office to aid local preservation
projects, such as producing historic theme or context
studies, cultural resource inventories, assessments of prop-
erties to determine their eligibility for local and National
Register designation, building reuse and feasibility studies,
design guidelines and conservation ordinances, and publi-
cations to educate the public about the benefits of historic
preservation. For more information on the Certified Local
Government Program, go to the following Web site
<www.cr.nps.gov/hps/clg>, or contact the Certified Local
Government Program at the address listed in the "Quick
Reference" section on p. 30.
Jackson Ward Historic District, Richmond,VA
(Walter Smalling. Jr.)
NOMINATIONS AND
LISTING PROCEDURES
A nyone can prepare a nomination to the National
Register, working with the appropriate State
Historic Preservation Officer, Federal Preservation Officer,
or Tribal Historic Preservation Officer. Their offices are
partners of the National Park Service and are responsible
for surveying and evaluating properties in their jurisdic-
tions, determining which of these properties are eligible for
listing, working with individuals to prepare nominations to
the National Register, and officially nominating properties
to the National Register. The procedures for nominations
are found in 36 CFR Part 60, which is available on the Web
at <www.cr.nps.gov/nr/regulations.htm>. 36 CFR Part 60
can also be obtained by contacting the National Register
Reference Desk at the address listed in the "Quick
Reference" section on p. 30.
Standard registration forms are used for all National
Register nominations and are available on disk by contact-
ing the National Register Reference Desk. The forms can
also be downloaded from the Web at <www.cr.nps.gov/nr/
publications/forms.htm>. Instructions for completing the
registration forms are found in National Register bulletins,
available by contacting the Reference Desk, and are also
available on the Web at <www.cr.nps.gov/nr/publications/
bulletins.htmx
State Nominations
Ordinarily, local citizens or the staff of the State
Historic Preservation Officer prepare National Register
nomination forms. Next, a State review board, composed
of professionals in the fields of American history, architec-
tural history, architecture, pre-contact and post-contact
archeology, and other related disciplines—and sometimes
citizen members—reviews the nominations. This review
board makes a recommendation to the State Historic
Preservation Officer either to approve each nomination, if
in the board's opinion it meets the National Register
criteria, or to disapprove the nomination if it does not.
During the time the State Historic Preservation Officer
is reviewing the proposed nomination, property owners
and local authorities are notified. All property owners are
given the opportunity to comment on the nomination.
Owners of private property are given the opportunity to
concur in or object to the nomination. If the owner of a
private property (or the majority of such owners of a
property) or district with multiple owners object to the
nomination, the State Historic Preservation Officer for-
wards the nomination to the National Park Service only for
a determination about whether the property is eligible for
listing. If a majority of private property owners do not
object, the State Historic Preservation Officer may
approve the nomination and forward it to the
National Park Service to be considered for listing. If the
property is approved by the National Park Service, it is
officially entered in the National Register.
Further information on the procedures to nominate
properties to the National Register and the preservation
program within your State is available from the appropriate
State historic preservation office. You can receive the
address and phone number for your State historic preser-
vation office on the Web at <grants.cr.nps.gov/Shpos/
SHPCLSearch.cfm> (note, this Web address does not begin
with "www"), or by contacting the National Conference of
State Historic Preservation Officers at the address listed in
the "Quick Reference" section on p. 30.
Federal Nominations
Nominations to the National Register for properties
under Federal ownership or control are submitted to the
National Park Service through Federal Preservation
Officers appointed by the agency heads. Federal agencies
prepare National Register nominations, notify local offi-
cials and provide the State Historic Preservation Officer an
opportunity to comment prior to sending nominations to
the National Park Service. The Federal Preservation Officer
approves each nomination and forwards it to the National
Park Service for final consideration. If the National Park
Service approves the nomination, the property is officially
entered in the National Register.
Information on Federal nominations to the National
Register and other preservation programs of Federal agen-
cies is available from the Federal Preservation Officer for
each agency. A list of Federal Preservation Officers is found
on the Web at <www.achp.gov/fpo.html>, or by contacting
the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, at the
address listed in the "Quick Reference" section on p. 30.
Tribal Nominations
Nominations to the National Register for properties on
Tribal lands are submitted to the National Park Service
through Tribal Historic Preservation Officers appointed by
each Tribal government. The process for considering nomi-
nations is substantially equivalent to the process used by
the State historic preservation offices. Before a Tribe can
assume these responsibilities, the Secretary of the Interior
must approve a Tribe's plan for carrying them out.
Further information on the procedures to nominate
properties on Tribal land to the National Register and
the Tribal preservation programs is available from the
appropriate Tribal Preservation Officer. A list of Tribal
Preservation Officers is available on the Web at
<www.cr.nps.gov/hps/tribal/>, or by contacting the
Tribal Preservation Program at the address given in the
"Quick Reference" section on p. 30.
Nominations by persons
and local governments
The National Park Service may accept a nomination
directly from any person or local government for inclu-
sion of a property in the National Register if the proper-
ty is located in a State where there is no State historic
preservation program approved by the National Park
Service.
EVALUATING PROPERTIES
FOR LISTING IN THE
NATIONAL REGISTER
The National Park Service has established a set of
criteria that historic properties must meet in order
to be eligible for or listed in the National Register. The
National Register's criteria for evaluating the significance
of historic places were developed to recognize the accom-
plishments of all peoples who have made a contribution to
our country's history and heritage. The criteria are
designed to guide State and local governments, Federal
agencies, Tribal governments and others in evaluating
potential entries in the National Register.
Criteria for Evaluation
The quality of significance in American history, archi-
tecture, archeology, engineering, and culture is present in
districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects that pos-
sess integrity of location, design, setting, materials, work-
manship, feeling, and association, and
a. that are associated with events that have made a sig-
nificant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; or
b. that are associated with the lives of persons
significant in our past; or
c. that embody the distinctive characteristics of a
type, period, or method of construction, or that represent
the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or
that represent a significant and distinguishable entity
whose components may lack individual distinction; or
d. that have yielded, or may be likely to yield,
information important in prehistory or history.
Criteria Considerations
Ordinarily cemeteries, birthplaces, or graves of
historical figures, properties owned by religious institu-
tions or used for religious purposes, structures that have
been moved from their original locations, reconstructed
historic buildings, properties primarily commemorative in
nature, and properties that have achieved significance
within the past 50 years shall not be considered eligible
for the National Register. However, such properties will
qualify if they are integral parts of districts that meet the
criteria, or if they fall within the following categories:
a. a religious property deriving primary significance
from architectural or artistic distinction or historical
importance; or
b. a building or structure removed from its original
location but which is significant primarily for architectural
value, or which is the surviving structure most importantly
associated with a historic person or event; or
c. a birthplace or grave of a historical figure of out-
standing importance if there is no other appropriate site or
building directly associated with his productive life; or
d. a cemetery that derives its primary significance from
graves of persons of transcendent importance, from age,
from distinctive design features, or from association with
historic events; or
e. a reconstructed building when accurately executed
in a suitable environment and presented in a dignified
manner as part of a restoration master plan, and when no
other building or structure with the same association has
survived; or
f. a property primarily commemorative in intent if
design, age, tradition, or symbolic value has invested it with
its own historical significance; or
g. a property achieving significance within the past
50 years if it is of exceptional importance.
21
DETERMINATIONS OF
ELIGIBILITY
The National Historic Preservation Act also gives
the Keeper of the National Register authority
to determine that historic properties are eligible for
listing in the National Register, without formally listing
them. This occurs when Federal agencies request a deter-
mination of eligibility to assist in their planning (see
"Federal Activities" on p. n). Frequently, consensus on the
National Register eligibility of a property that may be
affected by a Federal project is achieved between the
Federal agency, the State or Tribal Historic Preservation
Officer, and any interested parties, which may include
Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations, local
governments, and permit or license applicants. When
consensus cannot be achieved between the parties, the
Federal agency will request the Keeper of the National
Register to determine whether or not the property is eligi-
ble. More information on this process is found in the
National Register procedures 36 CFR Part 63. In addition
to the regulations, information can be obtained from the
following Web site <www.achp.gov>, or by contacting the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation at the address
given in the "Quick Reference" section on p. 30.
Determinations of eligibility also occur when:
• the private property owner—or for properties with
more than one owner, a majority of private property
owners—objects to listing in the National Register.
• National Park Service certifies that State or local dis-
tricts meet the National Register criteria for purposes
of Federal investment tax credits for rehabilitation.
• the Secretary of the Interior makes a unilateral
determination of eligibility, after an investigation
and onsite inspection, when this action will assist in
the preservation of a historic property. The Secretary
may make this determination in unusual circum-
stances.
As is the case with formal listing, determinations of
eligibility do not restrict the rights of private property
owners to do what they wish with their property, provided
that no Federal license, permit, or funding is involved.
"There's a story beneath the ground, everywhere around
historic buildings, even where the buildings are gone. And the
story is a dynamic story—it's not a relic. What archeologists
are trying to uncover is a way of life and a sequence of
events—time passing. That's an exciting part of a National
Register historic site." (William Kelso, Jamestown Rediscovery)
r
V
1 .. 1
ti ¡f W
^v\>
j^^<£
*£;
Philadelphia Toboggan C
¡M# j^y»JMM*— k
'tV-'TVv
$P
"*4
Dmpany Carousel #6, Burlington, CO
(NHL Collection)
^^^^^^^^^
JttL ••••^k.
•^•¡^•n^^B . -r _ |
• •
étroglyph at the Gottschall Site rock shelter,
nty, Wl'tStatc Historical Society of Wiscuisin)
i 22 23
NATIONAL HISTORIC
LANDMARKS
T o recognize the national significance of properties
that possess exceptional values or qualities in
illustrating or interpreting the heritage of the United States,
the Secretary of the Interior designates some historic
places as National Historic Landmarks. National Park
Service historians and archeologists study and evaluate
these properties within the context of major themes of
American history. Properties judged to be nationally signif-
icant are nominated by the National Park Service and
forwarded to the National Park System Advisory Board,
which may recommend to the Secretary of the Interior that
the property be designated a National Historic Landmark.
If not previously listed in the National Register, National
Historic Landmarks are automatically listed in the Register
when they are designated. For more information on the
National Historic Landmarks program, go to <www.cr.
nps.gov/nhl>, or contact the National Historic Landmarks
Survey at the address listed in the "Quick Reference"
section on p. 30.
The preservation of this irreplaceable heritage is in the
public interest so that its vital legacy of cultural, educational,
aesthetic, inspirational, economic, and energy benefits will
be maintained and enriched for future generations of
Americans. (Excerpt, National Historic Preservation Act of 1966)
rleston Old and Historic District, Charleston, SC
(Jack Boucher, HABS)
RESEARCH, EDUCATION,
TOURISM, AND TECHNICAL
ASSISTANCE
The National Register is a rich source of informa-
tion for public education, interpretation, tourism,
and research on our past and the places that document the
contributions of all people. Detailed information about the
National Register and its various research, education,
tourism, and technical assistance efforts is located on the
National Register homepage at <www.cr.nps.gov/nr>.
The National Register Collection and the
National Register Information System
The National Register Collection documents the
properties listed in and determined eligible for the
Register. The documentation on each property provides
a physical description of the place, information about its
history and significance, a bibliography, photographs, and
maps. Researchers can take advantage of this unparalleled
collection in a number of ways. The National Register
Information System (NRIS), a computerized index to the
National Register, is available to the public through the
Web at <www.nr.nps.gov>. Researchers can visit the
National Register collection in Washington, D.C. during
business hours, Monday through Friday except Federal
holidays. Copies of documentation can be received by con-
tacting the National Register Reference Desk at the address
given in the "Quick Reference" section on p. 30.
National Register Bulletins and Videos
The National Register has developed a broad range of
published and audiovisual technical assistance materials to
meet the needs of States, Federal agencies, national parks,
local governments, Indian tribes, and private citizens seek-
ing to nominate properties and use the National Register. A
publications order form; the National Register Starter Kit,
consisting of National Register Bulletins How to Complete
the National Register Form, How to Apply the National
Register Criteria for Evaluation, and Researching a Historic
Property; registration forms; and a number of other
technical bulletins are available on the Web at <www.cr.
nps.gov/nr/pubs>, or by sending your request to the
National Register Reference Desk at the address given in
the "Quick Reference" section on p. 30.
Teaching with Historic Places
Teaching with Historic Places (TwHP) is an educational
program that uses places listed in the National Register to
enhance traditional classroom instruction of history, social
studies, geography, and other subjects. Whether or not they
can visit a site, students can investigate historic places near
and far and discover how places all around us in our com-
munities and States reflect broad themes in American his-
tory and connect us to the past. Through lesson plans,
workshops and technical guidance, and an extensive Web
site, TwHP provides information on topics such as using
places in education; writing lesson plans; deciphering clues
in the physical evidence of historic places; and forming
interdisciplinary collaborations. The cornerstone of TwHP
is a series of tested classroom lesson plans written by
historians, educators, preservationists, historic site inter-
preters, and teams, and accessible in print, on the Web, or
both. Teachers and others can search online lesson plans
by theme, State, or historic time period. For more informa-
tion on the program, and for a complete list of available
lessons, visit the following Web site <www.cr.nps.gov/
nr/twhp/>.
The historical and cultural foundations of the Nation
should be preserved as a living part of our community life
and development in order to give a sense of orientation to
the American people. (Excerpt, National Historic Preservation
Act of 1966)
26 27
Discover Qur Shared Heritage
Travel Itinerary Series
The National Register promotes heritage tourism
through the Discover Our Shared Heritage travel itiner
ary series. The itineraries, some of which are available in
print, others exclusively on the National Register Web site,
explore a historic theme, region, or city by highlighting,
describing and linking properties listed in the National
Register. Each itinerary is a self-guided tour that provides
descriptions of the properties, maps, and links to other
pertinent Web sites. For more information, go to the
following Web site <www.cr.nps.gov/nr/travel>, or contact
Discover Our Shared Heritage at the
address listed in the "Quick
Reference" section on p. 30.
"Aliiolani Hale (Honolulu, Hawaii) was placed on the
National Register in im-1 think being on the Register is
important not only far the people who live here, but it serves
as a symbol to the Nation that this building is important
because of its contribution to our national history, as well as
to State history. I think it's important for people to under-
stand that there are very unique differences throughout the
Nation" (I t-Mii Mi's Upilia, Executive Director, Judiciary
History Center)
QUICK REFERENCE
National Register of Historic Places
National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service
1849 C Street, NW, MS 2280, Washington, DC 20240
This address also applies to Teaching with Historic Places,
Discover Our Shared Heritage, and the National Register
Reference Desk.
202/354-2211; nr_info@nps.gov; <www.cr.nps.gov/nr>
National Historic Landmarks Survey
National Historic Landmarks Survey, National Park Service
1849 C Street, NW, MS 2280, Washington, DC 20240
202/354-2210; nhl_info@nps.gov; <www.cr.nps.gov/nhl>
State, Federal, and Tribal
Historic Preservation Offices
State historic preservation office list: <grants.cr.nps.gov/
Shpos/SHPO_Search.cfm> (sic)
Or contact: National Conference of State Historic Preservation
Officers, 444 N. Capitol Street, NW, Suite 342, Washington, DC
20001, 202/624-5465
Federal preservation office list: <www.achp.gov/fpo.html>
Or contact: Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, Old Post
Office Building, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 809,
Washington, DC 20004; 202/606-8503
Tribal historic preservation office list: <www.cr.nps.gov/hps/
tribaI/>
Or contact: Tribal Preservation Program, Heritage Preservation
Services, National Park Service, 1849 C Street, NW, MS 2255,
Washington, DC 20240; 202/354-1837
Federal Historic Preservation
Tax Incentives
Federal Historic Preservation Tax Incentives
Heritage Preservation Services (2255), National Park Service
1849 C Street NW, MS 2255, Washington, DC 20240
202/513-7270 x.2; hps_info@nps.gov; <www.cr.nps.gov/hps/tps/tax>
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
Old Post Office Building, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Suite 809, Washington, DC 20004
202/606-8503; achp@achp.gov; <www.achp.gov>
Certified Local Government Program
Certified Local Government Program
Heritage Preservation Services, National Park Service
1849 C Street, NW, MS 2255, Washington, DC 20240
202/513-7270 x.4; hps_info@nps.gov; <www.cr.nps.gov/hps/clg>
Delta Queen steamboat, New Orleans, LA (Jack Boucher,
30
Quotes from individuals used throughout this brochure are taken
from the video, American Legacy: The Work of the National Register
of Historic Places. Information on obtaining the video is found on
the National Register Web site at <www.cr.nps.gov/nr/publications/
books.htm> or by writing to the National Register at the address
on the back of this brochure.
Opposite: Scotty's Castle, Death Valley National Park, CA
(Jack Boucher, HABS)
32
NATIONAL REGISTER
BULLETIN
Technical information on the the National Register of Historic Places:
survey, evaluation, registration, and preservation of cultural resources
National Park Service
Cultural Resources
National Register, History and Education
How to Apply the National Register
Criteria for Evaluation
.,
The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide
access to our Nation's natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust
responsibilities to tribes.
The National Park Service preserves unimpaired the natural and cultural
resources and values of the National Park System for the enjoyment, education,
and inspiration of this and future generations. The Park Service cooperates
with partners to extend the benefits of natural and cultural resource
conservation and outdoor recreation throughout this country and the world.
This material is partially based upon work conducted under a cooperative
agreement with the National Conference of State Historic Preservation Officers
and the U.S. Department of the Interior.
Date of publication: 1990; revised 1991,1995,1997. Revised for Internet 1995.
Cover
(Top Left) Criterion B - Frederick Douglass Home, Washington, D.C. From 1877-
1899, this was the home of Frederick Douglass, the former slave who rose to become a
prominent author, abolitionist, editor, orator, and diplomat. (Walter Smalling, Jr.)
(Top Right) Criterion D - Francis Canyon Ruin, Blanco vicinity, Rio Arriba
County, New Mexico. A fortified village site composed of 40 masonry-walled rooms
arranged in a cluster of four house blocks. Constructed ca. 1716-1742 for protection
against raiding Utes and Comanches, the site has information potential related to Na-
vajo, Pueblo, and Spanish cultures. (Jon Samuelson)
(Bottom Left) Criterion C - Bridge in Cherrytree Township, Venago County,
Pennsylvania. Built in 1882, this Pratt through truss bridge is significant for engi-
neering as a well preserved example of a type of bridge frequently used in northwestern
Pennsylvania in the late 19th century. (Pennsylvania Department of Transportation)
(Bottom Right) Criterion A - Main Street/Market Square Historic District,
Houston, Harris County, Texas. Until well into the 20th century this district marked
the bounds of public and business life in Houston. Constructed between the 1870s and
1920s, the district includes Houston's municipal and county buildings, and served as
the city's wholesale, retail, and financial center. (Paul Hester)
PREFACE
Preserving historic properties as
important reflections of our American
heritage became a national policy
through passage of the Antiquities
Act of 1906, the Historic Sites Act of
1935, and the National Historic Pres-
ervation Act of 1966, as amended.
The Historic Sites Act authorized the
Secretary of the Interior to identify
and recognize properties of national
significance (National Historic Land-
marks) in United States history and
archeology. The National Historic
Preservation Act of 1966 authorized
the Secretary to expand this recogni-
tion to properties of local and State
significance in American history, ar-
chitecture, archeology, engineering,
and culture, and worthy of preserva-
tion. The National Register of His-
toric Places is the official list of these
recognized properties, and is main-
tained and expanded by the National
Park Service on behalf of the Secretary
of the Interior.1
The National Register of Historic
Places documents the appearance and
importance of districts, sites, build-
ings, structures, and objects signifi-
cant in our prehistory and history.
These properties represent the major
patterns of our shared local, State,
and national experience. To guide the
selection of properties included in the
National Register, the National Park
Service has developed the National
Register Criteria for Evaluation.
These criteria are standards by which
every property that is nominated to
the National Register is judged. In
addition, the National Park Service
has developed criteria for the recogni-
tion of nationally significant proper-
ties, which are designated National
Historic Landmarks and prehistoric
and historic units of the National Park
System. Both these sets of criteria
were developed to be consistent with
the Secretary of the Interior's Stan-
dards and Guidelines for Archeology and
Historic Preservation, which are uni-
form, national standards for preserva-
tion activities.2
This publication explains how the
National Park Service applies these
criteria in evaluating the wide range
of properties that may be significant
in local, State, and national history.
It should be used by anyone who
must decide if a particular property
qualifies for the National Register of
Historic Places.
Listing properties in the National
Register is an important step in a na-
tionwide preservation process. The
responsibility for the identification,
initial evaluation, nomination, and
treatment of historic resources lies
with private individuals, State historic
preservation offices, and Federal pres-
ervation offices, local governments,
and Indian tribes. The final evalua-
tion and listing of properties in the
National Register is the responsibility
of the Keeper of the National Register.
This bulletin was prepared by staff
of the National Register Branch, Inter-
agency Resources Division, National
Park Service, with the assistance of the
History Division. It was originally is-
sued in draft form in 1982. The draft
was revised into final form by Patrick
W. Andrus, Historian, National Regis-
ter, and edited by Rebecca H.
Shrimpton, Consulting Historian.
Beth L. Savage, National Register
and Sarah Dillard Pope, National Reg-
ister, NCSHPO coordinated the latest
revision of this bulletin. Antionette J.
Lee, Tanya Gossett, and Kira Badamo
coordinated earlier revisions.
'Properties listed in the National Register receive limited Federal protection and certain benefits. For more information concerning the effects of
listing, and how the National Register may be used by the general public and Certified Local Governments, as well as by local, State, and Federal
agencies, and for copies of National Register Bulletins, contact the National Park Service, National Register, 1849 C Street, NW, NC400, Washington,
D.C., 20240. Information may also be obtained by visiting the National Register Web site at www.cr.nps.gov/nr or by contacting any of the historic
preservation offices in the States and territories.
2The Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation are found in the Federal Register, Vol. 48, No. 190
(Thursday, September 29,1983). A copy can be obtained by writing the National Park Service, Heritage Preservation Services (at the address above).
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Preface i
I. Introduction 1
II. National Register Criteria for Evaluation 2
III. How to Use this Bulletin to Evaluate a Property 3
IV. How to Define Categories of Historic Properties 4
Building 4
Structure 4
Object 5
Site 5
District 5
Concentration, Linkage, & Continuity of Features 5
Significance 5
Types of Features 5
Geographical Boundaries 6
Discontiguous Districts 6
V. How to Evaluate a Property Within its Historic Context 7
Understanding Historic Contexts 7
How to Evaluate a Property Within Its Historic Context 7
Properties Significant Within More Than on Historic Context 9
Comparing Related Properties 9
Local, State, and National Historic Contexts 9
VI. How to Identify the Type of Significance of a Property 11
Introduction 11
Criterion A: Event 12
Understanding Criterion A 12
Applying Criterion A 12
Types of Events 12
Association of the Property with the Events 12
Significance of the Association 12
Traditional Cultural Values 13
Criterion B: Person 14
Understanding Criterion B 14
Applying Criterion B 15
Significance of the Individual 15
Association with the Property 15
Comparison to Related Properties 15
Association with Groups 15
Association with Living Persons 16
Association with Architects/Artisans 16
Native American Sites 16
Criterion C: Design/Construction 17
Understanding Criterion C • 17
Applying Criterion C 18
Distinctive Characteristics of Type, Period, and Method of Construction 18
Historic Adaptation of the Original Property 19
Works of a Master .....20
Properties Possessing High Artistic Values 20
Criterion D: Information Potential 21
Understanding Criterion D 21
Applying Criterion D 21
Archeological Sites 21
Buildings, Structures, and Objects 21
Association with Human Activity 22
Establishing a Historic Context 22
Developing Research Questions 22
Establishing the Presence of Adequate Data 23
Integrity 23
Partly Excavated or Disturbed Properties 23
Completely Excavated Sites 24
VII. How to Apply the Criteria Considerations 25
Introduction 25
Criteria Consideration A: Religious Properties 26
Understanding Criteria Consideration A 26
Applying Criteria Consideration A 26
Eligibility for Historic Events , 26
Eligibility for Historic Persons 27
Eligibility for Architectural or Artistic Distinction 28
Eligibility for Information Potential 28
Ability to Reflect Historic Associations 28
Criteria Consideration B: Moved Properties 29
Understanding Criteria Consideration B 29
Applying Criteria Consideration B 29
Eligibility for Architectural Value 29
Eligibility for Historic Associations 30
Setting and Environment 30
Association Dependent on the Site 30
Properties Designed to Be Moved 31
Artificially Created Groupings 31
Portions of Properties 31
Criteria Consideration C: Birthplaces and Graves 32
Understanding Criteria Consideration C 32
Applying Criteria Consideration C 32
Persons of Outstanding Importance 32
Last Surviving Property Associated with a Person 32
Eligibility for Other Associations 33
Criteria Consideration D: Cemeteries 34
Understanding Criteria Consideration D 34
Applying Criteria Consideration D 34
Persons of Transcendent Importance 34
Eligibility on the Basis of Age 35
Eligibility for Design 35
Eligibility for Association with Events 35
Eligibility for Information Potential 35
Integrity 36
National Cemeteries 36
Criteria Consideration E: Reconstructed Properties 37
Understanding Criteria Consideration E 37
Applying Criteria Consideration E 37
Accuracy of the Reconstruction 37
Suitable Environment 37
Restoration Master Plans 38
iii
Last Surviving Property of a Type 38
Reconstructions Older than Fifty Years 38
Criteria Consideration F: Commemorative Properties 39
Understanding Criteria Consideration F 39
Applying Criteria Consideration F 39
Eligibility for Design 39
Eligibility for Age, Tradition, or Symbolic Value 40
Ineligibility as the Last Representative of an Event or Person 40
Criteria Consideration G: Properties that Have Achieved Significance Within the Past Fifty Years 41
Understanding Criteria Consideration G 41
Applying Criteria Consideration G 42
Eligibility for Exceptional Importance 42
Historical Perspective 42
National Park Service Rustic Architecture 42
Veterans Administration Hospitals 42
Comparison with Related Properties 42
World War II Properties 42
Eligibility for Information Potential 43
Historic Districts 43
Properties Over Fifty Years in Age, Under Fifty Years in Significance 43
Requirement to Meet the Criteria, Regardless of Age 43
VIII. How to Evaluate the Integrity of a Property 44
Introduction 44
Understanding the Aspects of Integrity 44
Location 44
Design 44
Setting 44
Materials 45
Workmanship 45
Feeling 45
Association 45
Assessing Integrity in Properties 45
Defining the Essential Physical Features 46
Visibility of the Physical Features 46
Comparing Similar Properties 47
Determining the Relevant Aspects of Integrity 48
IX. Summary of the National Historic Landmarks Criteria for Evaluation 50
X. Glossary 53
XL List of National Register Bulletins 54
IV
I. INTRODUCTION
The National Register is the
nation's inventory of historic places
and the national repository of docu-
mentation on the variety of historic
property types, significance, abun-
dance, condition, ownership, needs,
and other information. It is the begin-
ning of a national census of historic
properties. The National Register Cri-
teria for Evaluation define the scope
of the National Register of Historic
Places; they identify the range of re-
sources and kinds of significance that
will qualify properties for listing in
the National Register. The Criteria
are written broadly to recognize the
wide variety of historic properties as-
sociated with our prehistory and his-
tory.
Decisions concerning the signifi-
cance, historic integrity, documenta-
tion, and treatment of properties can
be made reliably only when the re-
source is evaluated within its historic
context. The historic context serves as
the framework within which the Na-
tional Register Criteria are applied to
specific properties or property types.
(See Part V for a brief discussion of
historic contexts. Detailed guidance
for developing and applying historic
contexts is contained in National Reg-
ister Bulletin: How to Complete the Na-
tional Register Registration Form and
National Register Bulletin: How to Com-
plete the National Register Multiple
Property Documentation Form )
The guidelines provided here are
intended to help you understand the
National Park Service's use of the Cri-
teria for Evaluation, historic contexts,
integrity, and Criteria Considerations,
and how they apply to properties un-
der consideration for listing in the
National Register. Examples are pro-
vided throughout, illustrating specific
circumstances in which properties are
and are not eligible for the National
Register. This bulletin should be used
by anyone who is:
•Preparing to nominate a property
to the National Register,
• Seeking a determination of a
property's eligibility,
• Evaluating the comparable sig-
nificance of a property to those
listed in the National Register, or
• Expecting to nominate a property
as a National Historic Landmark
in addition to nominating it to
the National Register.
This bulletin also contains a sum-
mary of the National Historic Land-
marks Criteria for Evaluation (see
Part IX). National Historic Land-
marks are those districts, sites, build-
ings, structures, and objects desig-
nated by the Secretary of the Interior
as possessing national significance in
American history, architecture, arche-
ology, engineering, and culture. Al-
though National Register documenta-
tion includes a recommendation
about whether a property is signifi-
cant at the local, State, or national
level, the only official designation of
national significance is as a result of
National Historic Landmark designa-
tion by the Secretary of the Interior,
National Monument designation by
the President of the United States, or
establishment as a unit of the National
Park System by Congress. These
properties are automatically listed in
the National Register.
II. THE NATIONAL
REGISTER CRITERIA FOR
EVALUATION
CRITERIA FOR
EVALUATION:3
The quality of significance in
American history, architecture, arche-
ology, engineering, and culture is
present in districts, sites, buildings,
structures, and objects that possess in-
tegrity of location, design, setting, ma-
terials, workmanship, feeling, and as-
sociation, and:
A. That are associated with events that
have made a significant contribu-
tion to the broad patterns of our
history; or
B. That are associated with the lives of
persons significant in our past; or
C. That embody the distinctive
characteristics of a type, period, or
method of construction, or that
represent the work of a master, or
that possess high artistic values, or
that represent a significant and
distinguishable entity whose
components may lack individual
distinction; or
D. That have yielded, or may be likely
to yield, information important in
prehistory or history.
CRITERIA
CONSIDERATIONS:
Ordinarily cemeteries, birthplaces,
or graves of historical figures, proper-
ties owned by religious institutions or
used for religious purposes, structures
that have been moved from their
original locations, reconstructed his-
toric buildings, properties primarily
commemorative in nature, and prop-
erties that have achieved significance
within the past 50 years shall not be
considered eligible for the National
Register. However, such properties
will qualify if they are integral parts of
districts that do meet the criteria or if
they fall within the following catego-
ries:
a. A religious property deriving
primary significance from architec-
tural or artistic distinction or
historical importance; or
b. A building or structure removed
from its original location but which
is significant primarily for architec-
tural value, or which is the surviv-
ing structure most importantly
associated with a historic person or
event; or
c. A birthplace or grave of a historical
figure of outstanding importance
if there is no appropriate site or
building directly associated with
his or her productive life; or
d. A cemetery which derives its
primary significance from graves
of persons of transcendent impor-
tance, from age, from distinctive
design features, or from association
with historic events; or
e. A reconstructed building when
accurately executed in a suitable
environment and presented in a
dignified manner as part of a
restoration master plan, and when
no other building or structure with
the same association has survived;
or
f. A property primarily commemora-
tive in intent if design, age, tradi-
tion, or symbolic value has in-
vested it with its own exceptional
significance; or
g. A property achieving significance
within the past 50 years if it is of
exceptional importance.
3The Criteria for Evaluation are found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 36, Part 60, and are reprinted here in full.
III. HOW TO USE THIS
BULLETIN TO EVALUATE A
PROPERTY
For a property to qualify for the
National Register it must meet one of
the National Register Criteria for
Evaluation by:
• Being associated with an impor-
tant historic context and
• Retaining historic integrity of
those features necessary to con-
vey its significance.
Information about the property
based on physical examination and
documentary research is necessary to
evaluate a property's eligibility for the
National Register. Evaluation of a
property is most efficiently made
when following this sequence:
1. Categorize the property (Part IV).
A property must be classified as
a district, site, building, structure,
or object for inclusion in the
National Register.
2. Determine which prehistoric or
historic context(s) the property
represents (Part V). A property
must possess significance in
American history, architecture,
archeology, engineering, or
culture when evaluated within
the historic context of a relevant
geographic area.
3. Determine whether the property
is significant under the National
Register Criteria (Part VI). This
is done by identifying the links to
important events or persons,
design or construction features,
or information potential that
make the property important.
4. Determine if the property repre-
sents a type usually excluded from
the National Register (Part VII).
If so, determine if it meets any of
the Criteria Considerations.
5. Determine whether the property
retains integrity (Part VIII).
Evaluate the aspects of location,
design, setting, workmanship, ma-
terials, feeling, and association
that the property must retain to
convey its historic significance.
If, after completing these steps, the
property appears to qualify for the Na-
tional Register, the next step is to pre-
pare a written nomination. (Refer to
National Register Bulletin: How to
Complete the National Register Registra-
tion Form.)
IV. HOW TO DEFINE
CATEGORIES OF HISTORIC
PROPERTIES
The National Register of Historic
Places includes significant properties,
classified as buildings, sites, districts,
structures, or objects. It is not used to
list intangible values, except in so far
as they are associated with or re-
flected by historic properties. The Na-
tional Register does not list cultural
events, or skilled or talented individu-
als, as is done in some countries.
Rather, the National Register is ori-
ented to recognizing physically con-
crete properties that are relatively
fixed in location.
For purposes of National Register
nominations, small groups of proper-
ties are listed under a single category,
using the primary resource. For ex-
ample, a city hall and fountain would
be categorized by the city hall (build-
ing), a farmhouse with two outbuild-
ings would be categorized by the
farmhouse (building), and a city park
with a gazebo would be categorized
by the park (site). Properties with
large acreage or a number of re-
sources are usually considered dis-
tricts. Common sense and reason
should dictate the selection of catego-
ries.
BUILDING
A building, such as a house, barn,
church, hotel, or similar construc-
tion, is created principally to shelter
any form of human activity. "Build-
ing" may also be used to refer to a
historically and functionally related
unit, such as a courthouse and jail or
a house and barn.
Buildings eligible for the National
Register must include all of their basic
structural elements. Parts of build-
ings, such as interiors, facades, or
wings, are not eligible independent of
the rest of the existing building. The
whole building must be considered,
and its significant features must be
identified.
If a building has lost any of its basic
structural elements, it is usually con-
sidered a "ruin" and is categorized as
a site.
Examples of buildings include:
administration building
carriage house
church
city or town hall
courthouse
detached kitchen, barn, and privy
dormitory
fort
garage
hotel
house
library
mill building
office building
post office
school
social hall
shed
stable
store
theater
train station
STRUCTURE
The term "structure" is used to
distinguish from buildings those
functional constructions made usu-
ally for purposes other than creating
human shelter.
Structures nominated to the
National Register must include all of
the extant basic structural elements.
Parts of structures can not be consid-
ered eligible if the whole structure
remains. For example, a truss bridge
is composed of the metal or wooden
truss, the abutments, and supporting
piers, all of which, if extant, must be
included when considering the
property for eligibility.
If a structure has lost its historic
configuration or pattern of organiza-
tion through deterioration or demoli-
tion, it is usually considered a "ruin"
and is categorized as a site.
Examples of structures include:
aircraft
apiary
automobile
bandstand
boats and ships
bridge
cairn
canal
carousel
corner ib
dam
earthwork
fence
gazebo
grain elevator
highway
irrigation system
kiln
lighthouse
railroad grade
silo
trolley car
tunnel
windmill
OBJECT
The term "object" is used to
distinguish from buildings and
structures those constructions that
are primarily artistic in nature or are
relatively small in scale and simply
constructed. Although it may be, by
nature or design, movable, an object
is associated with a specific setting
or environment.
Small objects not designed for a
specific location are normally not
eligible. Such works include trans-
portable sculpture, furniture, and
other decorative arts that, unlike a
fixed outdoor sculpture, do not
possess association with a specific
place.
Objects should be in a setting
appropriate to their significant
historic use, roles, or character.
Objects relocated to a museum are
inappropriate for listing in the Na-
tional Register.
Examples of objects include:
boundary marker
fountain
milepost
monument
scupture
statuary
SITE
A site is the location of a signifi-
cant event, a prehistoric or historic
occupation or activity, or a building
or structure, whether standing,
ruined, or vanished, where the
location itself possesses historic,
cultural, or archeological value
regardless of the value of any exist-
ing structure.
A site can possess associative
significance or information potential
or both, and can be significant under
any or all of the four criteria. A site
need not be marked by physical
remains if it is the location of a
prehistoric or historic event or pattern
of events and if no buildings, struc-
tures, or objects marked it at the time
of the events. However, when the
location of a prehistoric or historic
event cannot be conclusively deter-
mined because no other cultural
materials were present or survive,
documentation must be carefully
evaluated to determine whether the
traditionally recognized or identified
site is accurate.
A site may be a natural landmark
strongly associated with significant
prehistoric or historic events or
patterns of events, if the significance
of the natural feature is well docu-
mented through scholarly research.
Generally, though, the National
Register excludes from the definition
of "site" natural waterways or bodies
of water that served as determinants
in the location of communities or
were significant in the locality's
subsequent economic development.
While they may have been "avenues
of exploration," the features most
appropriate to document this signifi-
cance are the properties built in
association with the waterways.
Examples of sites include:
battlefield
campsite
cemeteries significant for information
potential or historic association
ceremonial site
designed landscape
habitation site
natural feature (such as a rock formation)
having cultural significance
pet ro glyph
rock carving
rock shelter
ruins of a building or structure
shipwreck
trail
village site
DISTRICT
A district possesses a significant
concentration, linkage, or continuity
of sites, buildings, structures, or
objects united historically or aes-
thetically by plan or physical devel-
opment.
CONCENTRATION, LINKAGE, &
CONTINUITY OF FEATURES
A district derives its importance
from being a unified entity, even
though it is often composed of a wide
variety of resources. The identity of a
district results from the interrelation-
ship of its resources, which can
convey a visual sense of the overall
historic environment or be an ar-
rangement of historically or function-
ally related properties. For example, a
district can reflect one principal
activity, such as a mill or a ranch, or it
can encompass several interrelated
activities, such as an area that in-
cludes industrial, residential, or
commercial buildings, sites, struc-
tures, or objects. A district can also be
a grouping of archeological sites
related primarily by their common
components; these types of districts
often will not visually represent a
specific historic environment.
SIGNIFICANCE
A district must be significant, as
well as being an identifiable entity. It
must be important for historical,
architectural, archeological, engineer-
ing, or cultural values. Therefore,
districts that are significant will
usually meet the last portion of
Criterion C plus Criterion A, Criterion
B, other portions of Criterion C, or
Criterion D.
TYPES OF FEATURES
A district can comprise both
features that lack individual distinc-
tion and individually distinctive
features that serve as focal points. It
may even be considered eligible if all
of the components lack individual
distinction, provided that the group-
ing achieves significance as a whole
within its historic context. In either
case, the majority of the components
that add to the district's historic
character, even if they are individu-
ally undistinguished, must possess
integrity, as must the district as a
whole.
A district can contain buildings,
structures, sites, objects, or open
spaces that do not contribute to the
significance of the district. The
number of noncontributing properties
a district can contain yet still convey
its sense of time and place and
historical development depends on
how these properties affect the
district's integrity. In archeological
districts, the primary factor to be
considered is the effect of any distur-
bances on the information potential of
the district as a whole.
GEOGRAPHICAL BOUNDARIES
A district must be a definable
geographic area that can be distin-
guished from surrounding properties
by changes such as density, scale,
type, age, style of sites, buildings,
structures, and objects, or by docu-
mented differences in patterns of
historic development or associations.
It is seldom defined, however, by the
limits of current parcels of ownership,
management, or planning boundaries.
The boundaries must be based upon a
shared relationship among the
properties constituting the district.
DISCONTIGUOUS DISTRICTS
A district is usually a single geo-
graphic area of contiguous historic
properties; however, a district can
also be composed of two or more
definable significant areas separated
by nonsignificant areas. A
discontiguous district is most appro-
priate where:
• Elements are spatially discrete;
• Space between the elements is
not related to the significance of
the district; and
• Visual continuity is not a factor
in the significance.
In addition, a canal can be treated
as a discontiguous district when the
system consists of man-made sections
of canal interspersed with sections of
river navigation. For scattered
archeological properties, a
discontiguous district is appropriate
when the deposits are related to each
other through cultural affiliation,
period of use, or site type.
It is not appropriate to use the
discontiguous district format to
include an isolated resource or small
group of resources which were once
connected to the district, but have
since been separated either through
demolition or new construction. For
example, do not use the discontiguous
district format to nominate individual
buildings of a downtown commerical
district that have become isolated
through demolition.
Examples of districts include:
business districts
canal systems
groups of habitation sites
college campuses
estates and farms with large acreage/
numerous properties
industrial complexes
irrigation systems
residential areas
rural villages
transportation networks
rural historic districts
Ordeman-Shaw Historic District, Montgomery, Montgomery County, Alabama.
Historic districts derive their identity from the interrationship of their resources. Part
of the defining characteristics of this 19th century residential district in Montgomery,
Alabama, is found in the rhythmic pattern of the rows of decorative porches. (Frank L.
Thiermonge, III)
V. HOW TO EVALUATE A
PROPERTY WITHIN ITS
HISTORIC CONTEXT
UNDERSTANDING
HISTORIC
CONTEXTS
To qualify for the National Regis-
ter, a property must be significant;
that is, it must represent a significant
part of the history, architecture,
archeology, engineering, or culture of
an area, and it must have the charac-
teristics that make it a good represen-
tative of properties associated with
that aspect of the past. This section
explains how to evaluate a property
within its historic context.4
The significance of a historic
property can be judged and explained
only when it is evaluated within its
historic context. Historic contexts are
those patterns or trends in history by
which a specific occurrence, property,
or site is understood and its meaning
(and ultimately its significance)
within history or prehistory is made
clear. Historians, architectural
historians, folklorists, archeologists,
and anthropologists use different
words to describe this phenomena
such as trend, pattern, theme, or
cultural affiliation, but ultimately the
concept is the same.
The concept of historic context is
not a new one; it has been fundamen-
tal to the study of history since the
18th century and, arguably, earlier
than that. Its core premise is that
resources, properties, or happenings
in history do not occur in a vacuum
but rather are part of larger trends or
patterns.
In order to decide whether a
property is significant within its
historic context, the following five
things must be determined:
• The facet of prehistory or history
of the local area, State, or the na-
tion that the property represents;
• Whether that facet of prehistory
or history is significant;
• Whether it is a type of property
that has relevance and impor-
tance in illustrating the historic
context;
• How the property illustrates that
history; and finally
• Whether the property possesses
the physical features necessary to
convey the aspect of prehistory
or history with which it is associ-
ated.
These five steps are discussed in
detail below. If the property being
evaluated does represent an impor-
tant aspect of the area's history or
prehistory and possesses the requisite
quality of integrity, then it qualifies
for the National Register.
HOW TO EVALUATE
A PROPERTY
WITHIN ITS
HISTORIC CONTEXT
Identify what the property repre-
sents: the theme(s), geographical
limits, and chronological period that
provide a perspective from which to
evaluate the property's significance.
Historic contexts are historical
patterns that can be identified through
consideration of the history of the
property and the history of the sur-
rounding area. Historic contexts may
have already been defined in your area
by the State historic preservation office,
Federal agencies, or local governments.
In accordance with the National Regis-
ter Criteria, the historic context may
relate to one of the following:
• An event, a series of events or ac-
tivities, or patterns of an area's de-
velopment (Criterion A);
• Association with the life of an im-
portant person (Criterion B);
• A building form, architectural style,
engineering technique, or artistic
values, based on a stage of physical
development, or the use of a mate-
rial or method of construction that
shaped the historic identity of an
area (Criterion C); or
• A research topic (Criterion D).
4 For a complete discussion of historic contexts, see National Register Bulletin: Guidelines for Completing National Register of Historic Places
Registration Forms.
Determine how the theme of the
context is significant in the history of
the local area, the State, or the
nation.
A theme is a means of organizing
properties into coherent patterns
based on elements such as environ-
ment, social/ethnic groups, transpor-
tation networks, technology, or
political developments that have
influenced the development of an area
during one or more periods of prehis-
tory or history. A theme is considered
significant if it can be demonstrated,
through scholarly research, to be
important in American history. Many
significant themes can be found in the
following list of Areas of Significance
used by the National Register.
AREAS OF SIGNIFICANCE
Agriculture
Architecture
Archeology
Prehistoric
Historic—Aboriginal
Historic—Non-Aboriginal
Art
Commerce
Communications
Community Planning and Development
Conservation
Economics
Education
Engineering
Entertainment/Recreation
Ethnic Heritage
Asian
Black
European
Hispanic
Native American
Pacific Islander
Other
Exploration/Settlement
Health/Medicine
Industry
Invention
Landscape Architecture
Law
Literature
Maritime History
Military
Performing Arts
Philosophy
Politics/Government
Religion
Science
Social History
Transportation
Other
Determine what the property type
is and whether it is important in
illustrating the historic context.
A context may be represented by a
variety of important property types.
For example, the context of "Civil
War Military Activity in Northern
Virginia" might be represented by
such properties as: a group of mid-
19th century fortification structures;
an open field where a battle occurred;
a knoll from which a general directed
troop movements; a sunken transport
ship; the residences or public build-
ings that served as company head-
quarters; a railroad bridge that served
as a focal point for a battle; and
earthworks exhibiting particular
construction techniques.
Because a historic context for a
community can be based on a distinct
period of development, it might
include numerous property types.
For example, the context "Era of
Industrialization in Grand Bay,
Michigan, 1875 -1900" could be
represented by important property
types as diverse as sawmills, paper
mill sites, salt refining plants, flour
mills, grain elevators, furniture
factories, workers housing, commer-
cial buildings, social halls, schools,
churches, and transportation facilities.
A historic context can also be based
on a single important type of prop-
erty. The context "Development of
County Government in Georgia,
1777 -1861" might be represented
solely by courthouses. Similarly,
"Bridge Construction in Pittsburgh,
1870 - 1920" would probably only
have one property type.
Determine how the property
represents the context through
specific historic associations, archi-
tectural or engineering values, or
information potential (the Criteria
for Evaluation).
For example, the context of county
government expansion is represented
under Criterion A by historic districts
or buildings that reflect population
growth, development patterns, the
role of government in that society,
and political events in the history oi
the State, as well as the impact of
county government on the physical
development of county seats. Under
Criterion C, the context is represented
by properties whose architectural
treatments reflect their governmental
functions, both practically and
symbolically. (See Part VI: How to
Identify the Type of Significance of a
Property.)
Determine what physical features
the property must possess in order
for it to reflect the significance of the
historic context.
These physical features can be
determined after identifying the
following:
• Which types of properties are as-
sociated with the historic context,
• The ways in which properties can
represent the theme, and
• The applicable aspects of integ-
rity.
Properties that have the defined
characteristics are eligible for listing.
(See Part VIII: How to Evaluate the
Integrity of a Property.)
PROPERTIES SIGNIFICANT
WITHIN MORE THAN ONE
HISTORIC CONTEXT
A specific property can be signifi-
cant within one or more historic
contexts, and, if possible, all of these
should be identified. For example, a
public building constructed in the
1830s that is related to the historic
context of Civil War campaigns in the
area might also be related to the
theme of political developments in the
community during the 1880s. A
property is only required, however, to
be documented as significant in one
context.
COMPARING RELATED
PROPERTIES
Properties listed in the National
Register must possess significance
when evaluated in the perspective of
their historic context. Once the
historic context is established and the
property type is determined, it is not
necessary to evaluate the property in
question against other properties if:
• It is the sole example of a prop-
erty type that is important in il-
lustrating the historic context or
• It clearly possesses the defined
characteristics required to
strongly represent the context.
If these two conditions do not
apply, then the property will have to
be evaluated against other examples
of the property type to determine its
eligibility. The geographic level
(local, State, or national) at which this
evaluation is made is the same as the
level of the historic context. (See Part
V: How to Evaluate a Property Within
Its Historic Context.)
LOCAL, STATE,
AND NATIONAL
HISTORIC
CONTEXTS
Historic contexts are found at a
variety of geographical levels or
scales. The geographic scale selected
may relate to a pattern of historical
development, a political division, or a
cultural area. Regardless of the scale,
the historic context establishes the
framework from which decisions
about the significance of related
properties can be made.
LOCAL HISTORIC
CONTEXTS
A local historic context represents
an aspect of the history of a town,
city, county, cultural area, or region,
or any portions thereof. It is defined
by the importance of the property, not
necessarily the physical location of the
property. For instance, if a property
is of a type found throughout a State,
or its boundaries extend over two
States, but its importance relates only
to a particular county, the property
would be considered of local signifi-
cance.
The level of context of archeologi-
cal sites significant for their informa-
tion potential depends on the scope of
the applicable research design. For
example, a Late Mississippian village
site may yield information in a
research design concerning one
settlement system on a regional scale,
while in another research design it
may reveal information of local
importance concerning a single
group's stone tool manufacturing
techniques or house forms. It is a
question of how the available infor-
mation potential is likely to be used.
STATE HISTORIC
CONTEXTS
Properties are evaluated in a State
context when they represent an aspect
of the history of the State as a whole
(or American Samoa, the District of
Columbia, the Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands, Guam,
Puerto Rico, or the Virgin Islands).
These properties do not necessarily
have to belong to property types
found throughout the entire State:
they can be located in only a portion
of the State's present political bound-
ary. It is the property's historic
context that must be important
statewide. For example, the "cotton
belt" extends through only a portion
of Georgia, yet its historical develop-
ment in the antebellum period af-
fected the entire State. These State
historic contexts may have associated
properties that are statewide or
locally significant representations. A
cotton gin in a small town might be a
locally significant representation of
this context, while one of the largest
cotton producing plantations might
be of State significance.
A property whose historic associa-
tions or information potential appears
to extend beyond a single local area
might be significant at the State level.
A property can be significant to more
than one community or local area,
however, without having achieved
State significance.
A property that overlaps several
State boundaries can possibly be
significant to the State or local history
of each of the States. Such a property
is not necessarily of national signifi-
cance, however, nor is it necessarily
significant to all of the States in which
it is located.
Prehistoric sites are not often
considered to have "State" signifi-
cance, per se, largely because States
are relatively recent political entities
and usually do not correspond closely
to Native American political territo-
ries or cultural areas. Numerous sites,
however, may be of significance to a
large region that might geographi-
cally encompass parts of one, or
usually several, States. Prehistoric
resources that might be of State
significance include regional sites that
provide a diagnostic assemblage of
artifacts for a particular cultural
group or time period or that provide
chronological control (specific dates
or relative order in time) for a series
of cultural groups.
NATIONAL HISTORIC
CONTEXTS
Properties are evaluated in a
national context when they represent
an aspect of the history of the United
States and its territories as a whole.
These national historic contexts may
have associated properties that are
locally or statewide significant
representations, as well as those of
national significance.
Properties designated as nationally
significant and listed in the National
Register are the prehistoric and
historic units of the National Park
System and those properties that have
been designated National Historic
Landmarks. The National Historic
Landmark criteria are the standards
for nationally significant properties;
they are found in the Code of Federal
Regulations, Title 36, Part 65 and are
summarized in this bulletin in Part IX:
Summary of National Historic Land-
marks Criteria for Evaluation.
A property with national signifi-
cance helps us understand the history
of the nation by illustrating the
nationwide impact of events or
persons associated with the property,
its architectural type or style, or
information potential. It must be of
exceptional value in representing or
illustrating an important theme in the
history of the nation.
Nationally significant properties
do not necessarily have to belong to a
property type found throughout the
entire country: they can be located in
only a portion of the present political
boundaries. It is their historic context
that must be important nationwide.
For example, the American Civil War
was fought in only a portion of the
United States, yet its impact was
nationwide. The site of a small
military skirmish might be a locally
significant representation of this
national context, while the capture of
the State's largest city might be a
statewide significant representation
of the national context.
When evaluating properties at the
national level for designation as a
National Historic Landmark, please
refer to the National Historic Land-
marks outline, History and Prehistory
in the National Park System and the
National Historic Landmarks Program
1987. (For more information about
the National Historic Landmarks
program, please write to the Depart-
ment of the Interior, National Park
Service, National Historic Land-
marks, 1849 C Street, NW, NC400,
Washington, DC 20240.)
10
VI. HOW TO IDENTIFY THE
TYPE OF SIGNIFICANCE OF A
PROPERTY
INTRODUCTION
When evaluated within its historic
context, a property must be shown to
be significant for one or more of the four
Criteria for Evaluation - A, B, C, or D
(listed earlier in Part U). The Criteria
describe how properties are signifi-
cant for their association with impor-
tant events or persons, for their
importance in design or construction,
or for their information potential.
The basis for judging a property's
significance and, ultimately, its
eligibility under the Criteria is historic
context. The use of historic context
allows a property to be properly
evaluated in a nearly infinite number
of capacities. For instance, Criterion
C: Design/Construction can accom-
modate properties representing
construction types that are unusual or
widely practiced, that are innovative
or traditional, that are "high style" or
vernacular, that are the work of a
famous architect or an unknown
master craftsman. The key to determin-
ing whether the characteristics or associa-
tions of a particular property are signifi-
cant is to consider the property within its
historic context.
After identifying the relevant
historic context(s) with which the
property is associated, the four
Criteria are applied to the property.
Within the scope of the historic
context, the National Register Criteria
define the kind of significance that the
properties represent.
For example, within the context of
"19th Century Gunpowder Produc-
tion in the Brandywine Valley,"
Criterion A would apply to those
properties associated with important
events in the founding and develop-
ment of the industry. Criterion B
would apply to those properties
associated with persons who are
significant in the founding of the
industry or associated with important
inventions related to gunpowder
manufacturing. Criterion C would
apply to those buildings, structures,
or objects whose architectural form or
style reflect important design qualities
integral to the industry. And Crite-
rion D would apply to properties that
can convey information important in
our understanding of this industrial
process. If a property qualifies under
more than one of the Criteria, its
significance under each should be
considered, if possible, in order to
identify all aspects of its historical
value.
NATIONAL REGISTER
CRITERIA FOR
EVALUATION*
The National Register Criteria
recognize different types of values
embodied in districts, sites, buildings,
structures, and objects. These values
fall into the following categories:
Associative value (Criteria A and
B): Properties significant for their
association or linkage to events
(Criterion A) or persons (Criterion B)
important in the past.
Design or Construction value
(Criterion C): Properties significant
as representatives of the manmade
expression of culture or technology.
Information value (Criterion D):
Properties significant for their ability
to yield important information about
prehistory or history.
""For a complete listing of the Criteria for
Evaluation, refer to Part II oi this bulletin.
11
CRITERION A: EVENT
Properties can be eligible for the National Register if they are associated with events that have made a significant
contribution to the broad patterns of our history.
UNDERSTANDING
CRITERION A:
EVENT
To be considered for listing under
Criterion A, a property must be
associated with one or more events
important in the defined historic
context. Criterion A recognizes
properties associated with single
events, such as the founding of a
town, or with a pattern of events,
repeated activities, or historic trends,
such as the gradual rise of a port city's
prominence in trade and commerce.
The event or trends, however, must
clearly be important within the
associated context: settlement, in the
case of the town, or development of a
maritime economy, in the case of the
port city. Moreover, the property
must have an important association
with the event or historic trends, and
it must retain historic integrity. (See
Part V: How to Evaluate a Property
Within its Historic Context.)
Several steps are involved in
determining whether a property is
significant for its associative values:
• Determine the nature and origin
of the property,
• Identify the historic context with
which it is associated, and
• Evaluate the property's history to
determine whether it is associ-
ated with the historic context in
any important way.
APPLYING
CRITERION A:
EVENT
TYPES OF EVENTS
A property can be associated with
either (or both) of two types of events:
• A specific event marking an im-
portant moment in American pre-
history or history and
• A pattern of events or a historic
trend that made a significant con-
tribution to the development of a
community, a State, or the nation.
Refer to the sidebar on the right for
a list of specific examples.
ASSOCIATION OF THE
PROPERTY WITH THE
EVENTS
The property you are evaluating
must be documented, through ac-
cepted means of historical or archeo-
logical research (including oral
history), to have existed at the time of
the event or pattern of events and to
have been associated with those
events. A property is not eligible if its
associations are speculative. For
archeological sites, well reasoned
inferences drawn from data recovered
at the site can be used to establish the
association between the site and the
events.
SIGNIFICANCE OF THE
ASSOCIATION
Mere association with historic
events or trends is not enough, in and
of itself, to qualify under Criterion A:
the property's specific association
must be considered important as well.
For example, a building historically in
commercial use must be shown to
have been significant in commercial
history.
EXAMPLES OF PROPERTIES
ASSOCIATED WITH EVENTS
Properties associated with specific events:
• The site of a battle.
• The building in which an important
invention was developed.
• A factory district where a significant
strike occurred.
• An archeological site at which a ma-
jor new aspect of prehistory was dis-
covered, such as the first evidence of
man and extinct Pleistocene animals
being contemporaneous.
• A site where an important facet of
European exploration occurred.
Properties associated with a pattern of
events:
• A trail associated with western mi-
gration.
• A railroad station that served as the
focus of a community's transporta-
tion system and commerce.
• A mill district reflecting the impor-
tance of textile manufacturing dur-
ing a given period.
• A building used by an important lo-
cal social organization.
• A site where prehistoric Native
Americans annually gathered for
seasonally available resources and
for social interaction.
• A downtown district representing a
town's growth as the commercial fo-
cus of the surrounding agricultural
area.
12
TRADITIONAL CULTURAL
VALUES
Traditional cultural significance is
derived from the role a property plays
in a community's historically rooted
beliefs, customs, and practices.
Properties may have significance
under Criterion A if they are associ-
ated with events, or series of events,
significant to the cultural traditions of
a community.5
Eligible
• A hilltop associated in oral his-
torical accounts with the
founding of an Indian tribe or
society is eligible.
• A rural community can be eli-
gible whose organization,
buildings, or patterns of
land use reflect the cultural
traditions valued by its long-
term residents.
• An urban neighborhood can
be eligible as the traditional
home of a particular cultural
group and as a reflection of its
beliefs and practices.
Not Eligible
• A site viewed as sacred by a
recently established Utopian or
religious community does not
have traditional cultural value
and is not eligible.
Criterion A - The Old Brulay Plantation, Brownsville vicinity, Cameron county,
Texas. Historically significant for its association with the development of agriculture
in southeast Texas, this complex of 10 brick buildings was constructed by George N.
Brulay, a French immigrant who introduced commercial sugar production and
irrigation to the Rio Grande Valley. (Photo by Texas Historical Commission).
5 For more information, refer to National Register Bulletin: Guidelines for Evaluating and Documenting Traditional Cultural Properties.
13
CRITERION B: PERSON
Properties may be eligible for the National Register if they are associated with the lives of persons significant in our
past.
UNDERSTANDING
CRITERION B:
PERSON6
Criterion B applies to properties
associated with individuals whose
specific contributions to history can
be identified and documented.
Persons "significant in our past"
refers to individuals whose activities
are demonstrably important within a
local, State, or national historic
context. The criterion is generally
restricted to those properties that
illustrate (rather than commemorate)
a person's important achievements.
(The policy regarding commemora-
tive properties, birthplaces, and
graves is explained further in Part
VIII: How to Apply the Criteria Consid-
erations.)
Several steps are involved in
determining whether a property is
significant for its associative values
under Criterion B. First, determine
the importance of the individual.
Second, ascertain the length and
nature of his/her association with the
property under study and identify the
other properties associated with the
individual. Third, consider the
property under Criterion B, as
outlined below.
EXAMPLES OF PROPERTIES
ASSOCIATED WITH PERSONS
Properties associated with a Significant
Person:
• The home of an important merchant
or labor leader.
• The studio of a significant artist.
• The business headquarters of an im-
portant industrialist.
Criterion B - The William Whitney House, Hinsdale, DuPage County, Illinois.
This building is locally significant for its historical association with William Whitney,
the founder of the town of Hinsdale, Illinois. Whitney, a citizen of New York State,
moved to Illinois, established the town, and while living here between 1870 and 1879
was a prominent local businessman and politician. (Photo by Frederick C. Cue).
'For further information on properties eligible under Criterion B, refer to National Register Bulletin: Guidelines for Evaluating and Documenting
Properties Associated with Significant Persons.
14
APPLYING
CRITERION B:
PERSON
SIGNIFICANCE OF THE
INDIVIDUAL
The persons associated with the
property must be individually signifi-
cant within a historic context. A
property is not eligible if its only
justification for significance is that it
was owned or used by a person who
is a member of an identifiable profes-
sion, class, or social or ethnic group.
It must be shown that the person
gained importance within his or her
profession or group.
Eligible
• The residence of a doctor, a
mayor, or a merchant is eli-
gible under Criterion B if the
person was significant in the
field of medicine, politics, or
commerce, respectively.
Not Eligible
• A property is not eligible un-
der Criterion B if it is associ-
ated with an individual about
whom no scholarly judgement
can be made because either re-
search has not revealed spe-
cific information about the
person's activities and their
impact, or there is insufficient
perspective to determine
whether those activities or
contributions were historically
important.
ASSOCIATION WITH THE
PROPERTY
Properties eligible under Criterion
B are usually those associated with a
person's productive life, reflecting the
time period when he or she achieved
significance. In some instances this
may be the person's home; in other
cases, a person's business, office,
laboratory, or studio may best repre-
sent his or her contribution. Proper-
ties that pre- or post-date an
individual's significant accomplish-
ments are usually not eligible. (See
Comparison to Related Properties, below,
for exceptions to this rule.)
The individual's association with
the property must be documented by
accepted methods of historical or
archeological research, including
written or oral history. Speculative
associations are not acceptable. For
archeological sites, well reasoned
inferences drawn from data recovered
at the site are acceptable.
COMPARISON TO RELATED
PROPERTIES
Each property associated with an
important individual should be
compared to other associated proper-
ties to identify those that best repre-
sent the person's historic contribu-
tions. The best representatives
usually are properties associated with
the person's adult or productive life.
Properties associated with an
individual's formative or later years
may also qualify if it can be demon-
strated that the person's activities
during this period were historically
significant or if no properties from the
person's productive years survives.
Length of association is an important
factor when assessing several proper-
ties with similar associations.
A community or State may contain
several properties eligible for associa-
tions with the same important person,
if each represents a different aspect of
the person's productive life. A
property can also be eligible if it has
brief but consequential associations
with an important individual. (Such
associations are often related to
specific events that occurred at the
property and, therefore, it may also be
eligible under Criterion A.)
ASSOCIATION WITH
GROUPS
For properties associated with
several community leaders or with a
prominent family, it is necessary to
identify specific individuals and to
explain their significant accomplish-
ments.
Eligible
• A residential district in which a
large number of prominent or
influential merchants, profes-
sionals, civic leaders, politi-
cians, etc., lived will be eligible
under Criterion B if the signifi-
cance of one or more specific
individual residents is explic-
itly justified.
• A building that served as the
seat of an important family is
eligible under Criterion B if the
significant accomplishments of
one or more individual family
members is explicitly justified.
Not Eligible
• A residential district in which a
large number of influential per-
sons lived is not eligible under
Criterion B if the accomplish-
ments of a specific indivi-
dual^) cannot be documented.
If the significance of the district
rests in the cumulative impor-
tance of prominent residents,
however, then the district
might still be eligible under
Criterion A. Eligibility, in this
case, would be based on the
broad pattern of community
development, through which
the neighborhood evolved into
the primary residential area for
this class of citizens.
• A building that served as the
seat of an important family will
not be eligible under Criterion
B if the significant accomplish-
ments of individual family
members cannot be docu-
mented. In cases where a suc-
cession of family members
have lived in a house and col-
lectively have had a demon-
strably significant impact on
the community, as a family, the
house is more likely to be sig-
nificant under Criterion A for
association with a pattern of
events.
15
ASSOCIATION WITH
LIVING PERSONS
Properties associated with living
persons are usually not eligible for
inclusion in the National Register.
Sufficient time must have elapsed to
assess both the person's field of
endeavor and his/her contribution to
that field. Generally, the person's
active participation in the endeavor
must be finished for this historic
perspective to emerge. (See Criteria
Considerations C and G in Part VII:
How to Apply the Criteria Consider-
ations.)
ASSOCIATION WITH
ARCHITECTS/ARTISANS
Architects, artisans, artists, and
engineers are often represented by
their works, which are eligible under
Criterion C. Their homes and studios,
however, can be eligible for consider-
ation under Criterion B, because these
usually are the properties with which
they are most personally associated.
NATIVE AMERICAN SITES
The known major villages of
individual Native Americans who
were important during the contact
period or later can qualify under
Criterion B. As with all Criterion B
properties, the individual associated
with the property must have made
some specific important contribution
to history. Examples include sites
significantly associated with Chief
Joseph and Geronimo.7
7 For more information, refer to National Register Bulletin: Guidelines for Evaluating and Documenting Traditional Cultural Properties.
16
CRITERION C:
DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION
Properties may be eligible for the National Register if they embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or
method of construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a
significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction.
Richland Plantation, East Feliciana Parish, Louisiana. Properties can qualify under
Criterion C as examples of high style architecture. Built in the 1830s, Richland is a
fine example of a Federal style residence with a Greek Revival style portico. (Photo by
Dave Gleason).
UNDERSTANDING
CRITERION C:
DESIGN/
CONSTRUCTION
This criterion applies to properties
significant for their physical design or
construction, including such elements
as architecture, landscape architec-
ture, engineering, and artwork. To be
eligible under Criterion C, a property
must meet at least one of the following
requirements:
• Embody distinctive characteris-
tics of a type, period, or method
of construction.
• Represent the work of a master.
• Possess high artistic value.
• Represent a significant and dis-
tinguishable entity whose com-
ponents may lack individual dis-
tinction.
The first requirement, that proper-
ties "embody the distinctive charac-
teristics of a type, period, or method
of construction/' refers to the way in
which a property was conceived,
designed, or fabricated by a people or
culture in past periods of history.
"The work of a master" refers to the
technical or aesthetic achievements of
an architect or craftsman. "High
artistic values" concerns the expres-
sion of aesthetic ideals or preferences
and applies to aesthetic achievement.
Resources "that represent a signifi-
cant and distinguishable entity whose
components may lack individual dis-
tinction" are called "districts." In the
Criteria for Evaluation (as published
in the Code of Federal Regulations and
reprinted here in Part II), districts are
defined within the context of Crite-
rion C. Districts, however, can be con-
sidered for eligibility under all the Crite-
ria, individually or in any combina-
tion, as is appropriate. For this rea-
son, the full discussion of districts is
contained in Part IV: How to Define
Categories of Historic Properties.
Throughout the bulletin, however,
districts are mentioned within the
context of a specific subject, such as
an individual Criterion.
Grant Family House, Saco vicinity,
York County, Maine. Properties
possessing high artistic value meet
Criterion C through the expression of
aesthetic ideals or preferences. The Grant
Family House, a modest Federal style
residence, is significant for its remarkably
well-preserved stenciled wall decorative
treatment in the entry hall and parlor.
Painted by an unknown artist ca. 1825,
this is a fine example of 19th century New
England regional artistic expression.
(Photo by Kirk F. Mohney).
17
EXAMPLES OF PROPERTIES
ASSOCIATED WITH DESIGN/
CONSTRUCTION
Properties associated with design and
construction:
• A house or commercial building rep-
resenting a significant style of archi-
tecture.
• A designed park or garden associated
with a particular landscape design
philosophy.
• A movie theater embodying high ar-
tistic value in its decorative features.
• A bridge or dam representing techno-
logical advances.
APPLYING
CRITERION C:
DESIGN/
CONSTRUCTION
DISTINCTIVE
CHARACTERISTICS OF
TYPE, PERIOD, AND
METHOD OF
CONSTRUCTION
This is the portion of Criterion C
under which most properties are
eligible, for it encompasses all archi-
tectural styles and construction
practices. To be eligible under this
portion of the Criterion, a property
must clearly illustrate, through
"distinctive characteristics/' the
following:
• The pattern of features common
to a particular class of resources,
• The individuality or variation of
features that occurs within the
class,
• The evolution of that class, or
• The transition between classes of
resources.
Distinctive Characteristics: "Dis-
tinctive characteristics" are the physi-
cal features or traits that commonly
recur in individual types, periods, or
methods of construction. To be
eligible, a property must clearly
contain enough of those characteristics
to be considered a true representative
of a particular type, period, or method
of construction.
Characteristics can be expressed in
terms such as form, proportion, struc-
ture, plan, style, or materials. They
can be general, referring to ideas of
design and construction such as basic
plan or form, or they can be specific,
referring to precise ways of combining
particular kinds of materials.
Eligible
• A building eligible under the
theme of Gothic Revival archi-
tecture must have the distinc-
tive characteristics that make
up the vertical and picturesque
qualities of the style, such as
pointed gables, steep roof
pitch, board and batten siding,
and ornamental bargeboard
and veranda trim.
• A late Mississippian village
that illustrates the important
concepts in prehistoric
community design and plan-
ning will qualify.
• A designed historic landscape
will qualify if it reflects a his-
toric trend or school of theory
and practice, such as the City
Beautiful Movement, evidenc-
ingdistinguished design, lay-
out, and the work of skilled
craftsmanship.
Not Eligible
• A commercial building with
some Art Deco detailing is not
eligible under Criterion C if the
detailing was added merely as
an afterthought, rather than
fully integrated with overall
lines and massing typical of the
Art Deco style or the transition
between that and another style.
• A designed landscape that has
had major changes to its his-
toric design, vegetation, origi-
nal boundary, topography/
grading, architectural features,
and circulation system will not
qualify.
Type, Period, and Method of
Construction: "Type, period, or
method of construction" refers to the
way certain properties are related to
one another by cultural tradition or
function, by dates of construction or
style, or by choice or availability of
materials and technology.
A structure is eligible as a speci-
men of its type or period of construc-
tion if it is an important example
(within its context) of building
practices of a particular time in
history. For properties that represent
the variation, evolution, or transition
of construction types, it must be
demonstrated that the variation, etc.,
was an important phase of the archi-
tectural development of: the area or
community in that it had an impact as
evidenced by later buildings. A
property is not eligible, however,
simply because it has been identified
as the only such property ever fabri-
cated; it must be demonstrated to be
significant as well.
Eligible
• A building that has some char-
acteristics of the Romanesque
Revival style and some charac-
teristics of the Commercial
style can qualify if it illustrates
the transition of architectural
design and the transition itself
is considered an important ar-
chitectural development.
• A Hopewellian mound, if it is
an important example of
mound building construction
techniques, would qualify as a
method or type of construc-
tion.
• A building which illustrates
the early or the developing
technology of particular
structural systems, such as
skeletal steel framing, is eli-
gible as an example of a
particular method of construc-
tion.
18
Swan Falls Dam and Power Plant, Murphy vicinity, Ada County, Idaho.
Significant works of engineering can qualify under Criterion C. Built between 1900-
1907 the Swan Falls Dam and Power Plant across the Snake River is one of the early
hydroelectric plants in the State of Idaho. (Photo by H.L. Hough).
HISTORIC ADAPTATION OF
THE ORIGINAL PROPERTY
A property can be significant not
only for the way it was originally
constructed or crafted, but also for the
way it was adapted at a later period,
or for the way it illustrates changing
tastes, attitudes, and uses over a
period of time.
A district is eligible under this
guideline if it illustrates the evolution
of historic character of a place over a
particular span of time.
Looney House, Asheville vicinity, St. Clair County, Alabama. Examples of
vernacular styles of architecture can qualify under Criterion C. Built ca. 1818, the
Looney House is significant as possibly the State's oldest extant two-story dogtrot type
of dwelling. The defining open center passage of the dogtrot was a regional building
response to the southern climate. (Photo by Carolyn Scott).
Eligible
• A Native American irrigation
system modified for use by
Europeans could be eligible if
it illustrates the technology of
either or both periods of con-
struction.
• An early 19th century farm-
house modified in the 1880s
with Queen Anne style orna-
mentation could be significant
for the modification itself, if it
represented a local variation
or significant trend in building
construction or remodelling,
was the work of a local master
(see Works of a Master on page
20), or reflected the tastes of an
important person associated
with the property at the time
of its alteration.
• A district encompassing the
commercial development of a
town between 1820 and 1910,
characterized by buildings of
various styles and eras, can be
eligible.
19
WORKS OF A MASTER
A master is a figure of generally
recognized greatness in a field, a
known craftsman of consummate
skill, or an anonymous craftsman
whose work is distinguishable from
others by its characteristic style and
quality. The property must express a
particular phase in the development
of the master's career, an aspect of his
or her work, or a particular idea or
theme in his or her craft.
A property is not eligible as the
work of a master, however, simply
because it was designed by a promi-
nent architect. For example, not every
building designed by Frank Lloyd
Wright is eligible under this portion
of Criterion C, although it might meet
other portions of the Criterion, for
instance as a representative of the
Prairie style.
The work of an unidentified
craftsman is eligible if it rises above
the level of workmanship of the other
properties encompassed by the
historic context.
PROPERTIES POSSESSING
HIGH ARTISTIC VALUES
High artistic values may be ex-
pressed in many ways, including
areas as diverse as community design
or planning, engineering, and sculp-
ture. A property is eligible for its
high artistic values if it so fully
articulates a particular concept of
design that it expresses an aesthetic
ideal. A property is not eligible,
however, if it does not express
aesthetic ideals or design concepts
more fully than other properties of its
type.
A Significant and Distinguishable
Entity Whose Components May Lack
Individual Distinction. This portion
of Criterion C refers to districts. For
detailed information on districts, refer
to Part IV of this bulletin.
Eligible
• A sculpture in a town square
that epitomizes the design
principles of the Art Deco style
is eligible.
• A building that is a classic ex-
pression of the design theories
o^ the Craftsman Style, such as
carefully detailed handwork,
is eligible.
• A landscaped park that syn-
thesizes early 20th century
principles of landscape archi-
tecture and expresses an aes-
thetic ideal of environment can
be eligible.
• Properties that are important
representatives of the aesthetic
values of a cultural group,
such as petroglyphs and
ground drawings by Native
Americans, are eligible.
Not Eligible
• A sculpture in a town square
that is a typical example of
sculpture design during its pe-
riod would not qualify for
high artistic value, although it
might be eligible if it were sig-
nificant for other reasons.
• A building that is a modest ex-
ample (within its historic con-
text) of the Craftsman Style of
architecture, or a landscaped
park that is characteristic of
turn of the century landscape
design would not qualify for
high artistic value.
20
CRITERION D: INFORMATION
POTENTIAL
Properties may be eligible for the National Register if they have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information im-
portant in prehistory or history.
UNDERSTANDING
CRITERION D:
INFORMATION
POTENTIAL
Certain important research ques-
tions about human history can only be
answered by the actual physical
material of cultural resources. Crite-
rion D encompasses the properties
that have the potential to answer, in
whole or in part, those types of
research questions. The most com-
mon type of property nominated
under this Criterion is the archeologi-
cal site (or a district comprised of
archeological sites). Buildings,
objects, and structures (or districts
comprised of these property types),
however, can also be eligible for their
information potential.
Criterion D has two requirements,
which must both be met for a property
to qualify:
• The property must have, or have
had, information to contribute to
our understanding of human his-
tory or prehistory, and
• The information must be consid-
ered important.
Under the first of these require-
ments, a property is eligible if it has
been used as a source oi data and
contains more, as yet unretrieved
data. A property is also eligible if it
has not yet yielded information but,
through testing or research, is deter-
mined a likely source of data.
Under the second requirement, the
information must be carefully evalu-
ated within an appropriate context to
determine its importance. Informa-
tion is considered "important" when
it is shown to have a significant
bearing on a research design that
addresses such areas as: 1) current
data gaps or alternative theories that
challenge existing ones or 2) priority
areas identified under a State or
Federal agency management plan.
APPLYING
CRITERION D:
INFORMATION
POTENTIAL
ARCHEOLOGICAL SITES
Criterion D most commonly
applies to properties that contain or
are likely to contain information
bearing on an important archeological
research question. The property must
have characteristics suggesting the
likelihood that it possesses configura-
tions of artifacts, soil strata, structural
remains, or other natural or cultural
features that make it possible to do
the following:
• Test a hypothesis or hypotheses
about events, groups, or pro-
cesses in the past that bear on im-
portant research questions in the
social or natural sciences or the
humanities; or
• Corroborate or amplify currently
available information suggesting
that a hypothesis is either true or
false; or
• Reconstruct the sequence of ar-
cheological cultures for the pur-
pose of identifying and explain-
ing continuities and discontinu-
ities in the archeological record
for a particular area.
BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES,
AND OBJECTS
While most often applied to
archeological districts and sites,
Criterion D can also apply to build-
ings, structures, and objects that
contain important information. In
order for these types of properties to
be eligible under Criterion D, they
themselves must be, or must have
been, the principal source of the
important information.
Eligible
• A building exhibiting a local
variation on a standard design
or construction technique can
be eligible if study could yield
important information, such as
how local availability of mate-
rials or construction expertise
affected the evolution of local
building development.
Not Eligible
• The ruins of a hacienda once
contained murals that have
since been destroyed. Histori-
cal documentation, however,
indicates that the murals were
significant for their highly un-
usual design. The ruins can
not be eligible under Criterion
D for the importance of the de-
stroyed murals if the informa-
tion is contained only in the
documentation.
21
Criterion D - Chantpe-Frentont 1 Archeological Site, Omaha vicinity, Douglas
County, Nebraska. This archeological site, dating from ca. 1100-1450 A.D., consists of
pit houses and storage pits which have the potential to yield important information
concerning the subsistence patterns, religious and mortuary practices, and social
organization of the prehistoric residents of eastern Nebraska. (Nebraska State
Historical Society)
ASSOCIATION WITH
HUMAN ACTIVITY
A property must be associated with
human activity and be critical for
understanding a site's historic environ-
ment in order to be eligible under
Criterion D. A property can be linked
to human activity through events,
processes, institutions, design, con-
struction, settlement, migration, ideals,
beliefs, lifeways, and other facets of the
development or maintenance of
cultural systems.
The natural environment associated
with the properties was often very
different from that of the present and
strongly influenced cultural develop-
ment. Aspects of the environment that
are pertinent to human activities
should be considered when evaluating
properties under Criterion D.
Natural features and paleontological
(floral and faunal) sites are not usually
eligible under Criterion D in and of
themselves. They can be eligible,
however, if they are either directly
related to human activity or critical to
understanding a site's historic environ-
ment. In a few cases, a natural feature
or site unmarked by cultural materials,
that is primarily eligible under Crite-
rion A, may also be eligible under
Criterion D, if study of the feature, or
its location, setting, etc. (usually in the
context of data gained from other
sources), will yield important informa-
tion about the event or period with
which it is associated.
ESTABLISHING A HISTORIC
CONTEXT
The information that a property
yields, or will yield, must be evalu-
ated within an appropriate historic
context. This will entail consulting
the body of information already
collected from similar properties or
other pertinent sources, including
modern and historic written records.
The researcher must be able to
anticipate if and how the potential
information will affect the definition
of the context. The information likely
to be obtained from a particular
property must confirm, refute, or
supplement in an important way
existing information.
A property is not eligible if it
cannot be related to a particular time
period or cultural group and, as a
result, lacks any historic context
within which to evaluate the impor-
tance of the information to be gained.
DEVELOPING RESEARCH
QUESTIONS
Having established the importance
of the information that may be
recovered, it is necessary to be explicit
in demonstrating the connection
between the important information
and a specific property. One ap-
proach is to determine if specific
important research questions can be
answered by the data contained in the
property. Research questions can be
related to property-specific issues, to
broader questions about a large
geographic area, or to theoretical
issues independent of any particular
geographic location. These questions
may be derived from the academic
community or from preservation
programs at the local, regional, State,
or national level. Research questions
are usually developed as part of a
"research design," which specifies not
only the questions to be asked, but
also the types of data needed to
supply the answers, and often the
techniques needed to recover the data.
Eligible
• When a site consisting of a vil-
lage occupation with midden
deposits, hearths, ceramics,
and stratified evidence of sev-
eral occupations is being
evaluated, three possible re-
search topics could be: 1) the
question of whether the site
occupants were indigenous to
the area prior to the time of oc-
cupation or recent arrivals, 2)
the investigation of the settle-
ment-subsistence pattern of
the occupants, 3) the question
of whether the region was a
center for the domestication of
plants. Specific questions
could include: A) Do the de-
posits show a sequential de-
velopment or sudden intro-
duction of Ceramic Type X?
B) Do the dates of the occupa-
tions fit our expectations based
on the current model for the
reoccupation behavior of
slash-and-burn agricultural-
ists? C) Can any genetic
changes in the food plant re-
mains be detected?
Not Eligible
• A property is not eligible if so
little can be understood about
it that it is not possible to de-
termine if specific important
research questions can be an-
swered by data contained in
the property.
22
ESTABLISHING THE
PRESENCE OF ADEQUATE
DATA
To support the assertion that a
property has the data necessary to
provide the important information,
the property should be investigated
with techniques sufficient to establish
the presence of relevant data catego-
ries. What constitutes appropriate
investigation techniques would
depend upon specific circumstances
including the property's location,
condition, and the research questions
being addressed, and could range
from surface survey (or photographic
survey for buildings), to the applica-
tion of remote sensing techniques or
intensive subsurface testing. Justifica-
tion of the research potential of a
property may be based on analogy to
another better known property if
sufficient similarities exist to establish
the appropriateness of the analogy.
Eligible
• Data requirements depend on
the specific research topics and
questions to be addressed. To
continue the example in "De-
veloping Research Questions"
above, we might want to ascer-
tain the following with refer-
ence to questions A, B, and C:
A) The site contains Ceramic
Type X in one or more occupa-
tion levels and we expect to be
able to document the local
evaluation of the type or its in-
trusive nature. B) The hearths
contain datable carbon deposits
and are associated with more
than one occupation. C) The
midden deposits show good
floral/faunal preservation, and
we know enough about the
physical evolution of food
plants to interpret signs that
suggest domestication.
Not Eligible
• Generally, if the applicable re-
search design requires clearly
stratified deposits, then subsur-
face investigation techniques
must be applied. A site com-
posed only of surface materials
can not be eligible for its poten-
tial to yield information that
could only be found in strati-
fied deposits.
INTEGRITY
The assessment of integrity for
properties considered for information
potential depends on the data require-
ments of the applicable research
design. A property possessing
information potential does not need to
recall visually an event, person,
process, or construction technique. It
is important that the significant data
contained in the property remain
sufficiently intact to yield the ex-
pected important information, if the
appropriate study techniques are
employed.
Eligible
• An irrigation system signifi-
cant for the information it will
yield on early engineering
practices can still be eligible
even though it is now filled in
and no longer retains the ap-
pearance of an open canal.
Not Eligible
• A plowed archeological site
contains several superimposed
components that have been
mixed to the extent that arti-
fact assemblages cannot be re-
constructed. The site cannot
be eligible if the data require-
ments of the research design
call for the study of artifacts
specific to one component.
PARTLY EXCAVATED OR
DISTURBED PROPERTIES
The current existence of appropri-
ate physical remains must be ascer-
tained in considering a property's
ability to yield important information.
Properties that have been partly
excavated or otherwise disturbed and
that are being considered for their
potential to yield additional impor-
tant information must be shown to
retain that potential in their remaining
portions.
Eligible
• A site that has been partially
excavated but still retains sub-
stantial intact deposits (or a
site in which the remaining de-
posits are small but contain
critical information on a topic
that is not well known) is eli-
gible.
Not Eligible
• A totally collected surface site
or a completely excavated bur-
ied site is not eligible since the
physical remains capable of
yielding important informa-
tion no longer exist at the site.
(See Completely Excavated Sites,
on page 24, for exception.)
Likewise, a site that has been
looted or otherwise disturbed
to the extent that the remain-
ing cultural materials have lost
their important depositional
context (horizontal or vertical
location of deposits) is not eli-
gible.
• A reconstructed mound or
other reconstructed site will
generally not be considered
eligible, because original cul-
tural materials or context or
both have been lost.
23
COMPLETELY EXCAVATED
SITES
Properties that have yielded
important information in the past and
that no longer retain additional
research potential (such as completely
excavated archeological sites) must be
assessed essentially as historic sites
under Criterion A. Such sites must be
significant for associative values
related to: 1) the importance of the
data gained or 2) the impact of the
property's role in the history of the
development of anthropology/
archeology or other relevant disci-
plines. Like other historic properties,
the site must retain the ability to
convey its association as the former
repository of important information,
the location of historic events, or the
representative of important trends.
Eligible
• A property that has been exca-
vated is eligible if the data re-
covered was of such impor-
tance that it influenced the di-
rection of research in the disci-
pline, as in a site that clearly
established the antiquity of the
human occupation of the New
World. (See Criterion A in
Part VI: How to Identify the
Type of Significance of a Property
and Criteria Consideration G
in Part VII: How to Apply the
Criteria Considerations.)
Not Eligible
• A totally excavated site that at
one time yielded important in-
formation but that no longer
can convey either its historic/
prehistoric utilization or sig-
nificant modern investigation
is not eligible.
24
VII. HOW TO APPLY THE
CRITERIA CONSIDERATIONS
INTRODUCTION
Certain kinds of properties are not
usually considered for listing in the
National Register: religious proper-
ties, moved properties, birthplaces
and graves, cemeteries, reconstructed
properties, commemorative proper-
ties, and properties achieving signifi-
cance within the past fifty years.
These properties can be eligible for
listing, however, if they meet special
requirements, called Criteria Consid-
erations, in addition to meeting the
regular requirements (that is, being
eligible under one or more of the four
Criteria and possessing integrity).
Part VII provides guidelines for
determining which properties must
meet these special requirements and
for applying each Criteria Consider-
ation.
The Criteria Considerations need to
be applied only to individual proper-
ties. Components of eligible districts
do not have to meet the special
requirements unless they make up the
majority of the district or are the focal
point of the district. These are the
general steps to follow when applying
the Criteria Considerations to your
property:
• Before looking at the Criteria
Considerations, make sure your
property meets one or more of
the four Criteria for Evaluation
and possesses integrity.
• If it does, check the Criteria Con-
siderations (next column) to see if
the property is of a type that is
usually excluded from the Na-
tional Register. The sections that
follow also list specific examples
of properties of each type. If
your property clearly does not fit
one of these types, then it does
not need to meet any special re-
quirements.
• If your property does fit one o^
these types, then it must meet the
special requirements stipulated
for that type in the Criteria Con-
siderations.
CRITERIA
CONSIDERATIONS*
Ordinarily cemeteries, birthplaces,
or graves of historical figures, proper-
ties owned by religious institutions or
used for religious purposes, structures
that have been moved from their
original locations, reconstructed
historic buildings, properties prima-
rily commemorative in nature, and
properties that have achieved signifi-
cance within the past fifty years shall
not be considered eligible for the
National Register. However, such
properties will qualify if they are
integral parts of districts that do meet
the criteria or if they fall within the
following categories:
a. a religious property deriving pri-
mary significance from architec-
tural or artistic distinction or his-
torical importance; or
b. a building or structure removed
from its original location but
which is significant primarily for
architectural value, or which is
the surviving structure most im-
portantly associated with a his-
toric person or event; or
c. a birthplace or grave of a histori-
cal figure of outstanding impor-
tance if there is no appropriate
site or building directly associ-
ated with his or her productive
life; or
d. a cemetery which derives its pri-
mary significance from graves of
persons of transcendent impor-
tance, from age, from distinctive
design features, from association
with historic events; or
e. a reconstructed building when
accurately executed in a suitable
environment and presented in a
dignified manner as part of a res-
toration master plan, and when
no other building or structure
with the same association has
survived; or
f. a property primarily commemo-
rative in intent if design, age, tra-
dition, or symbolic value has in-
vested it with its own exceptional
significance; or,
g. a property achieving significance
within the past 50 years if it is of
exceptional importance.
*The Criteria Considerations are taken from
the Criteria for Evaluation, found in the Code of
Federal Regulations, Title 36, Part 60.
25
CRITERIA CONSIDERATION A:
RELIGIOUS PROPERTIES
A religious property is eligible if it derives its primary significance from architectural or artistic distinction or historical
importance.
UNDERSTANDING
CRITERIA
CONSIDERATION
A: RELIGIOUS
PROPERTIES
A religious property requires
justification on architectural, artistic,
or historic grounds to avoid any
appearance of judgment by govern-
ment about the validity of any reli-
gion or belief. Historic significance
for a religious property cannot be
established on the merits of a reli-
gious doctrine, but rather, for archi-
tectural or artistic values or for
important historic or cultural forces
that the property represents. A
religious property's significance
under Criterion A, B, C, or D must be
judged in purely secular terms. A
religious group may, in some cases,
be considered a cultural group whose
activities are significant in areas
broader than religious history.
Criteria Consideration for Reli-
gious Properties applies:
• If the resource was constructed
by a religious institution.
• If the resource is presently
owned by a religious institution
or is used for religious purposes.
• If the resource was owned by a
religious institution or used for
religious purposes during its Pe-
riod of Significance.
• If Religion is selected as an Area
of Significance.
Examples of Properties that MUST
Meet Criteria Consideration A: Reli-
gions Properties
• A historic church where an inipor-
tant non-religious event occurred,
such as a speetfi by Patrick Henry.
• A historic synagogue that is signifi-
cant for architecture.
• A private residence is the site of a
meeting important to religious his-
tory.
• A commercial block that is currently
owned as an investment property by
a religious institution.
• A historic district in which religion
was either a predominant or signifi-
cant function during the period of
significance.
Example of Properties that DO NOT
Need to Meet Criteria Consideration
A: Religious Properties
• A residential or commercial district
that currently contains a small num-
ber of churches that are not a pre-
dominant feature of the district.
• A town meeting hall that serves as
the center of community activity and
houses a wide variety of public
and private meetings, including reli-
gious service. The resource is sig-
nificant for architecture and politics,
and the religious function is inciden-
tal
• A town hall, significant for politics
from 1875 to 1925, that housed
religious services during the 1950s.
Since the religious function occurred
after the Period of Significance, the
Criteria Consideration does not ap-
APPLYING
CRITERIA
CONSIDERATION
A: RELIGIOUS
PROPERTIES
ELIGIBILITY FOR HISTORIC
EVENTS
A religious property can be eligible
under Criterion A for any of three rea-
sons:
• It is significant under a theme in
the history of religion having
secular scholarly recognition; or
• It is significant under another his-
torical theme, such as explora-
tion, settlement, social philan-
thropy, or education; or
• It is significantly associated with
traditional cultural values.
26
RELIGIOUS HISTORY
A religious property can be eligible
if it is directly associated with either a
specific event or a broad pattern in the
history of religion.
Eligible
• The site of a convention at
which a significant denomina-
tional split occurred meets the
requirements of Criteria Con-
sideration A. Also eligible is a
property that illustrates the
broad impact of a religious in-
stitution on the history of a lo-
cal area.
Not Eligible
• A religious property cannot be
eligible simply because was
the place of religious services
for a community, or was the
oldest structure used by a reli-
gious group in a local area.
OTHER HISTORICAL
THEMES
A religious property can be eligible
if it is directly associated with either a
specific event or a broad pattern that
is significant in another historic
context. A religious property would
also qualify if it were significant for
its associations that illustrate the
importance of a particular religious
group in the social, cultural, eco-
nomic, or political history of the area.
Eligibility depends on the importance
of the event or broad pattern and the
role of the specific property.
Eligible
• A religious property can
qualify for its important role
as a temporary hospital during
the Revolutionary War, or if its
school was significant in the
history of education in the
community.
Not Eligible
• A religious property is not sig-
nificant in the history of edu-
cation in a community simply
because it had occasionally
served as a school.
TRADITIONAL CULTURAL
VALUES
When evaluating properties
associated with traditional cultures, it
is important to recognize that often
these cultures do not make clear
distinctions between what is secular
and what is sacred. Criteria Consider-
ation A is not intended to exclude
traditional cultural resources merely
because they have religious uses or
are considered sacred. A property or
natural feature important to a tradi-
tional culture's religion and mythol-
ogy is eligible if its importance has
been ethnohistorically documented
and if the site can be clearly defined.
It is critical, however, that the activi-
ties be documented and that the
associations not be so diffuse that the
physical resource cannot be ad-
equately defined.8
Eligible
• A specific location or natural
feature that an Indian tribe be-
lieves to be its place of origin
and that is adequately docu-
mented qualifies under Crite-
ria Consideration A.
ELIGIBILITY FOR HISTORIC
PERSONS
A religious property can be eligible
for association with a person impor-
tant in religious history, if that
significance has scholarly, secular
recognition or is important in other
historic contexts. Individuals who
would likely be considered significant
are those who formed or significantly
influenced an important religious
institution or movement, or who were
important in the social, economic, or
political history of the area. Proper-
ties associated with individuals
important only within the context of a
single congregation and lacking
importance in any other historic
context would not be eligible under
Criterion B.
Eligible
• A religious property strongly
associated with a religious
leader, such as George
Whitefield or Joseph Smith, is
eligible.
8 For more information on applying Criteria Consideration A to traditional cultural properties,
refer to National Register Bulletin: Guidelines for Evaluating and Documenting Traditional Cultural
Properties.
ELIGIBILITY FOR
ARCHITECTURAL OR
ARTISTIC DISTINCTION
A religious property significant for
its architectural design or construc-
tion should be evaluated as are other
properties under Criterion C; that is,
it should be evaluated within an
established architectural context and,
if necessary, compared to other
properties of its type, period, or
method of construction. (See "Com-
paring Related Properties" in Part V:
How to Evaluate a Property Within Its
Historic Context.)
ELIGIBILITY FOR
INFORMATION POTENTIAL
A religious property, whether a
district, site, building, structure, or
object, is eligible if it can yield impor-
tant information about the religious
practices of a cultural group or other
historic themes. This kind of property
should be evaluated as are other
properties under Criterion D, in
relation to similar properties, other
information sources, and existing data
gaps.
Eligible
• A historic camp meeting dis-
trict that meets the require-
ments of Criterion C for its sig-
nificance as a type of construc-
tion is eligible.
Eligible
• A 19th century camp meeting
site that could provide infor-
mation about the length and
intensity of site use during re-
vivals of the Second Great
Awakening is eligible.
• Rock cairns or medicine
wheels that had a historic reli-
gious mythological function
and can provide information
about specific cultural beliefs
are eligible.
Criteria Consideration A - Religious Properties. A religious property can qualify
as an exception to the Criteria if it is architecturally significant. The Church of the
Navity in Rosedale, Iberville Parish, Louisiana, qualified as a rare example in the State
of a 19th century small frame Gothic Revival style chapel. (Robert Obier)
ABILITY TO REFLECT
HISTORIC ASSOCIATIONS
As with all eligible properties,
religious properties must physically
represent the period of time for which
they are significance. For instance, a
recent building that houses an older
congregation cannot qualify based on
the historic activities of the group
because the current building does not
convey the earlier history. Likewise,
an older building that housed the
historic activities of the congregation
is eligible if it still physically repre-
sents the period of the congregation's
significance. However, if an older
building has been remodeled to the
extent that its appearance dates from
the time of the remodeling, it can only
be eligible if the period of significance
corresponds with the period of the
alterations.
Eligible
• A church built in the 18th cen-
tury and altered beyond recog-
nition in the 19th century is
eligible only if the additions
are important in themselves as
an example of late 19th cen-
tury architecture or as a reflec-
tion of an important period of
the congregation's growth.
Not Eligible
• A synagogue built in the 1920s
cannot be eligible for the im-
portant activities of its congre-
gation in the 18th and 19th
centuries. It can only be eli-
gible for significance obtained
after its construction date.
• A rural 19th century frame
church recently sheathed in
brick is not eligible because it
has lost its characteristic ap-
pearance and therefore can no
longer convey its 19th century
significance, either for archi-
tectural value or historic asso-
ciation.
28
CRITERIA CONSIDERATION B:
MOVED PROPERTIES
A property removed from its original or historically significant location can be eligible if it is significant primarily
for architectural value or it is the surviving property most importantly associated with a historic person or event.
UNDERSTANDING
CRITERIA
CONSIDERATION
B: MOVED
PROPERTIES
The National Register criteria limit
the consideration of moved properties
because significance is embodied in
locations and settings as well as in the
properties themselves. Moving a
property destroys the relationships
between the property and its sur-
roundings and destroys associations
with historic events and persons. A
move may also cause the loss of
historic features such as landscaping,
foundations, and chimneys, as well as
loss of the potential for associated
archeological deposits. Properties
that were moved before their period of
significance do not need to meet the
special requirements of Criteria
Consideration B.
One of the basic purposes of the
National Register is to encourage the
preservation of historic properties as
living parts of their communities. In
keeping with this purpose, it is not
usual to list artificial groupings of
buildings that have been created for
purposes of interpretation, protection,
or maintenance. Moving buildings to
such a grouping destroys the integrity
of location and setting, and can create
a false sense of historic development.
APPLYING
CRITERIA
CONSIDERATION
B: MOVED
PROPERTIES
ELIGIBILITY FOR
ARCHITECTURAL VALUE
A moved property significant
under Criterion C must retain enough
historic features to convey its architec-
tural values and retain integrity of
design, materials, workmanship,
feeling, and association.
Examples of Properties that MUST
Meet Criteria Consideration B:
Moved Properties
• A resource moved from one location
on its original site to another loca-
tion on the property, during or after
its Period of Significance.
• A district in which a significant
number of resources have been
moved from their original location.
• A district which has one moved
building that makes an especially
significant contribution to the dis-
trict.
• A portable resource, such as a ship or
railroad car, that is relocated to a
place incompatible with its original
function.
• A portable resource, such as a ship or
railroad car, whose importance is
critically linked to its historic loca-
tion or route and that is moved.
Examples of Properties that DO NOT
Need to Meet Criteria Consideration
B: Moved Properties
• A property that is moved prior to its
Period of Significance.
• A district in which only a small per-
centage of typical buildings in a dis-
trict are moved.
• A moved building that is part of a
complex but is of less significance
than the remaining (unmoved)
buildings.
• A portable resource, such as a ship or
railroad car, that is eligible under
Criterion C and is moved within its
natural setting (water, rails, etc.).
• A property that is raised or lowered
on its foundations.
29
ELIGIBILITY FOR HISTORIC
ASSOCIATIONS
A moved property significant
under Criteria A or B must be demon-
strated to be the surviving property
most importantly associated with a
particular historic event or an impor-
tant aspect of a historic person's life.
The phrase "most importantly associ-
ated" means that it must be the single
surviving property that is most
closely associated with the event or
with the part of the person's life for
which he or she is significant.
Eligible
• A moved building occupied by
an business woman during the
majority of her productive ca-
reer would be eligible if the
other extant properties are a
house she briefly inhabited
prior to her period of signifi-
cance and a commercial build-
ing she owned after her retire-
ment.
Not Eligible
• A moved building associated
with the beginning of rail
transportation in a community
is not eligible if the original
railroad station and ware-
house remained intact on their
original sites.
SETTING AND
ENVIRONMENT
In addition to the requirements
above, moved properties must still
have an orientation, setting, and
general environment that are compa-
rable to those of the historic location
and that are compatible with the
property's significance.
ASSOCIATION DEPENDENT
ON THE SITE
For a property whose design values
or historical associations are directly
dependent on its location, any move
will cause the property to lose its
integrity and prevent it from convey-
ing its significance.
Eligible
• A property significant as an
example of mid-19th century
rural house type can be eli-
gible after a move, provided
that it is placed on a lot that is
sufficient in size and character
to recall the basic qualities of
the historic environment and
setting, and provided that the
building is sited appropriately
in relation to natural and
manmade surroundings.
Not Eligible
• A rural house that is moved
into an urban area and a
bridge that is no longer situ-
ated over a waterway are not
eligible.
Eligible
• A farm structure significant
only as an example of a
method of construction pecu-
liar to the local area is still eli-
gible if it is moved within that
local area and the new setting
is similar to that of the original
location.
Not Eligible
• A 19th century rural residence
that was designed around par-
ticular topographic features,
reflecting that time period's
ideals of environment, is not
eligible if moved.
30
PROPERTIES DESIGNED TO
BE MOVED
A property designed to move or a
property frequently moved during its
historic use must be located in a
historically appropriate setting in
order to qualify, retaining its integrity
of setting, design, feeling, and associa-
tion. Such properties include automo-
biles, railroad cars and engines, and
ships.
ARTIFICIALLY CREATED
GROUPINGS
An artificially created grouping of
buildings, structures, or objects is not
eligible unless it has achieved signifi-
cance since the time of its assemblage.
It cannot be considered as a reflection
of the time period when the indi-
vidual buildings were constructed.
PORTIONS OF PROPERTIES
A moved portion of a building,
structure, or object is not eligible
because, as a fragment of a larger
resource, it has lost integrity of
design, setting, materials, workman-
ship, and location.
Eligible
• A ship docked in a harbor, a
locomotive on tracks or in a
railyard, and a bridge relo-
cated from one body of water
to another are eligible.
Not Eligible
• A ship on land in a park, a
bridge placed in a pasture, or a
locomotive displayed in an in-
door museum are not eligible.
Eligible
• A grouping of moved historic
buildings whose creation
marked the beginning of a ma-
jor concern with past lifestyles
can qualify as an early attempt
at historic preservation and as
an illustration of that genera-
tion's values.
Not Eligible
• A rural district composed of a
farmhouse on its original site
and a grouping oi historic
barns recently moved onto the
property is not eligible.
31
CRITERIA CONSIDERATION C:
BIRTHPLACES OR GRAVES
A birthplace or grave of a historical figure is eligible if the person is of outstanding importance and if there is no
other appropriate site or building directly associated with his or her productive life.
UNDERSTANDING
CRITERIA
CONSIDERATION
C: BIRTHPLACES
AND GRAVES
Birthplaces and graves often attain
importance as reflections o( the origins
of important persons or as lasting
memorials to them. The lives of
persons significant in our past nor-
mally are recognized by the National
Register through listing of properties
illustrative of or associated with that
person's productive life's work.
Birthplaces and graves, as properties
that represent the beginning and the
end of the life of distinguished indi-
viduals, may be temporally and
geographically far removed from the
person's significant activities, and
therefore are not usually considered
eligible.
Examples of Properties that MUST
Meet Criteria Consideration C: Birth-
places and Graves
• The birthplace of a significant person
who lived elsewhere during his or her
Period of Significance.
• A grave that is nominated for its as-
sociation with the significant person
buried in it.
• A grave that is nominated for infor-
mation potential.
Examples of Properties that DO NOT
Need to Meet Criteria Consideration
C: Birthplaces and Graves
• A house that was inhabited by a sig-
nificant person for his or her entire
lifetime.
• A grave located on the grounds of the
house where a significant person
spent his or her productive years.
32
APPLYING
CRITERIA
CONSIDERATION
C: BIRTHPLACES
AND GRAVES
PERSONS OF
OUTSTANDING
IMPORTANCE
The phrase "a historical figure of
outstanding importance" means that
in order for a birthplace or grave to
qualify, it cannot be simply the
birthplace or grave of a person
significant in our past (Criterion B). It
must be the birthplace or grave of an
individual who was of outstanding
importance in the history of the local
area, State, or nation. The birthplace
or grave of an individual who was
one of several people active in some
aspect of the history of a community,
a state, or the Nation would not be
eligible.
LAST SURVIVING
PROPERTY ASSOCIATED
WITH A PERSON
When an geographical area
strongly associated with a person of
outstanding importance has lost all
other properties directly associated
with his or her formative years or
productive life, a birthplace or grave
may be eligible.
ELIGIBILITY FOR OTHER
ASSOCIATIONS
A birthplace or grave can also be
eligible if it is significant for reasons
other than association with the
productive life of the person in
question. It can be eligible for signifi-
cance under Criterion A for associa-
tion with important events, under
Criterion B for association with the
productive lives of other important
persons, or under Criterion C for
architectural significance. A birth-
place or grave can also be eligible in
rare cases if, after the passage of time,
it is significant for its commemorative
value. (See Criteria Consideration F
for a discussion of commemorative
properties.) A birthplace or grave can
also be eligible under Criterion D if it
contains important information on
research, e.g., demography, pathol-
ogy, mortuary practices, socioeco-
nomic status differentiation.
Criteria Consideration C - Birthplaces. A birthplace of a historical figure is eligible
if the person is of outstanding importance and there is no other appropriate site or
building associated with his or her productive life. The Walter Reed Birthplace,
Gloucester vicinity, Gloucester County, Virginia is the most appropriate remaining
building associated with the life of the man who, in 1900, discovered the cause and
mode of transmission of the great scourge of the tropics, yellow fever. (Virginia
Historic Landmarks Commission)
33
CRITERIA CONSIDERATION D:
CEMETERIES
A cemetery is eligible if it derives its primary significance from graves of persons of transcendent importance, from
age, from distinctive design features, or from association with historic events.
UNDERSTANDING
CRITERIA
CONSIDERATION
D: CEMETERIES
A cemetery is a collection of graves
that is marked by stones or other
artifacts or that is unmarked but
recognizable by features such as
fencing or depressions, or through
maps, or by means of testing. Cem-
eteries serve as a primary means of an
individual's recognition of family
history and as expressions of collec-
tive religious and/or ethnic identity.
Because cemeteries may embody
values beyond personal or family-
specific emotions, the National
Register criteria allow for listing of
cemeteries under certain conditions.
Examples of Properties that MUST
Meet Criteria Consideration D:
Cemeteries
• A cemetery that is nominated indi-
vidually for Criterion A, B, or C,
Examples of Properties that DO NOT
Need to Meet Criteria Consideration
D: Cemeteries
• A cemetery that is nominated along
with its associated church, but the
church is the main resource nomi-
nated.
• A cemetery that is nominated under
Criterion D for information poten-
tial.
• A cemetery that is nominated as part
of a district but is not the focal point
of the district.
Criteria Consideration D - Cemeteries. The Hancock Cemetery, Quincy, Norfolk
County, Massachusetts meets the exception to the Criteria because it derives its
primary significance from its great age (the earliest burials date from 1640) and from
the distinctive design features found in its rich collection of late 17th and early 18th
century funerary art. (N. Hobart Holly)
34
APPLYING
CRITERIA
CONSIDERATION
D: CEMETERIES
PERSONS OF
TRANSCENDENT
IMPORTANCE
A cemetery containing the graves
of persons of transcendent importance
may be eligible. To be of transcendent
importance the persons must have
been of great eminence in their fields
of endeavor or had a great impact
upon the history of their community,
State, or nation. (A single grave that
is the burial place of an important
person and is located in a larger
cemetery that does not qualify under
this Criteria Consideration should be
treated under Criteria Consideration
C: Birthplaces and Graves.)
Eligible
• A historic cemetery containing
the graves of a number of per-
sons who were exceptionally
significant in determining the
course of a State's political or
economic history during a par-
ticular period is eligible.
Not Eligible
• A cemetery containing graves
of State legislators is not eli-
gible if they simply performed
the daily business of State gov-
ernment and did not have an
outstanding impact upon the
nature and direction of the
State's history.
ELIGIBILITY ON THE BASIS
OF AGE
Cemeteries can be eligible if they
have achieved historic significance for
their relative great age in a particular
geographic or cultural context.
Eligible
• A cemetery dating from a
community's original 1830s
settlement can attain signifi-
cance from its association with
that very early period.
ELIGIBILITY FOR DESIGN
Cemeteries can qualify on the basis
of distinctive design values. These
values refer to the same design values
addressed in Criterion C and can
include aesthetic or technological
achievement in the fields of city
planning, architecture, landscape
architecture, engineering, mortuary
art, and sculpture. As for all other
nominated properties, a cemetery
must clearly express its design values
and be able to convey its historic
appearance.
Eligible
• A Victorian cemetery is eli-
gible if it clearly expresses the
aesthetic principlesrelated to
funerary design for that pe-
riod, through such features as
the overall plan, landscaping,
statuary, sculpture, fencing,
buildings, and grave markers.
Not Eligible
• A cemetery cannot be eligible
for design values if it no
longer conveys its historic ap-
pearance because of the intro-
duction of new grave markers.
ELIGIBILITY FOR
ASSOCIATION WITH
EVENTS
Cemeteries may be associated with
historic events including specific
important events or general events
that illustrate broad patterns.
Eligible
• A cemetery associated with an
important Civil War battle is
eligible.
• A cemetery associated with the
settlement of an area by an
ethnic or cultural group is eli-
gible if the movement of the
group into the area had an im-
portant impact, if other prop-
erties associated with that
group are rare, and if few
documentary sources have
survived to provide informa-
tion about the group's
history.
Not Eligible
• A cemetery associated with a
battle in the Civil War does
not qualify if the battle was
not important in the history of
the war.
• A cemetery associated with an
area's settlement by an ethnic
or cultural group is not eli-
gible if the impact of the group
on the area cannot be estab-
lished, if other extant historic
properties better convey asso-
ciation with the group, or if
the information that the cem-
etery can impart is available in
documentary sources.
ELIGIBILITY FOR
INFORMATION POTENTIAL
Cemeteries, both historic and
prehistoric, can be eligible if they
have the potential to yield important
information. The information must be
important within a specific context
and the potential to yield information
must be demonstrated.
A cemetery can qualify if it has
potential to yield important informa-
tion provided that the information it
contains is not available in extant
documentary evidence.
Eligible
• A cemetery associated with the
settlement of a particular cul-
tural group will qualify if it
has the potential to yield im-
portant information about sub-
jects such as demography,
variations in mortuary prac-
tices, or the study of the cause
of death correlated with nutri-
tion or other variables.
35
INTEGRITY
Assessing the integrity of a historic
cemetery entails evaluating principal
design features such as plan, grave
markers, and any related elements
(such as fencing). Only that portion
of a historic cemetery that retains its
historic integrity can be eligible. If the
overall integrity has been lost because
of the number and size of recent grave
markers, some features such as
buildings, structures, or objects that
retain integrity may be considered as
individual properties if they are of
such historic or artistic importance
that they individually meet one or
more of the requirements listed
above.
NATIONAL CEMETERIES
National Cemeteries administered
by the Veterans Administration are
eligible because they have been
designated by Congress as primary
memorials to the military history of
the United States. Those areas within
a designated national cemetery that
have been used or prepared for the
reception of the remains of veterans
and their dependents, as well as any
landscaped areas that immediately
surround the graves may qualify.
Because these cemeteries draw their
significance from the presence of the
remains of military personnel who
have served the country throughout
its history, the age of the cemetery is
not a factor in judging eligibility,
although integrity must be present.
A national cemetery or a portion of
a national cemetery that has only been
set aside for use in the future is not
eligible.
36
CRITERIA CONSIDERATION E:
RECONTRUCTED PROPERTIES
A reconstructed property is eligible when it is accurately executed in a suitable environment and presented in a dig-
nified manner as part of a restoration master plan and when no other building or structure with the same associations
has survived. All three of these requirements must be met.
UNDERSTANDING
CRITERIA
CONSIDERATION E:
RECONSTRUCTED
PROPERTIES
"Reconstruction" is defined as the
reproduction of the exact form and
detail of a vanished building, struc-
ture, object, or a part thereof, as it
appeared at a specific period of time.
Reconstructed buildings fall into two
categories: buildings wholly con-
structed of new materials and build-
ings reassembled from some historic
and some new materials. BotH catego-
ries of properties present problems in
meeting the integrity requirements of
the National Register criteria.
Examples of Properties that MUST
Meet Criteria Consideration E: Recon-
structed Properties
• A property in which most or all of the
fabric is not original.
• A district in which an important re-
source or a significant number of re-
sources are reconstructions.
Examples of Properties that DO NOT
Need to Meet Criteria Consideration E:
Reconstructed Properties
• A property that is remodeled or reno-
vated and still has the majority of its
original fabric.
APPLYING
CRITERIA
CONSIDERATION E:
RECONSTRUCTED
PROPERTIES
ACCURACY OF THE
RECONSTRUCTION
The phrase "accurately executed"
means that the reconstruction must be
based upon sound archeological,
architectural, and historic data con-
cerning the historic construction and
appearance of the resource. That
documentation should include both
analysis of any above or below ground
material and research in written and
other records.
SUITABLE ENVIRONMENT
The phrase "suitable environment"
refers to: 1) the physical context
provided by the historic district and
2) any interpretive scheme, if the
historic district is used for interpretive
purposes. This means that the
reconstructed property must be
located at the same site as the original.
It must also be situated in its original
grouping of buildings, structures, and
objects (as many as are extant), and
that grouping must retain integrity.
In addition, the reconstruction must
not be misrepresented as an authentic
historic property.
Eligible
• A reconstructed plantation
manager's office building is
considered eligible because it
is located at its historic site,
grouped with the remaining
historic plantation buildings
and structures, and the planta-
tion as a whole retains integ-
rity. Interpretation of the
plantation district includes an
explanation that the manager's
office is not the original build-
ing, but a reconstruction.
Not Eligible
• The same reconstructed plan-
tation manager's office build-
ing would not qualify if it
were rebuilt at a location dif-
ferent from that of the original
building, or if the district as a
whole no longer reflected the
period for which it is signifi-
cant, or if a misleading inter-
pretive scheme were used for
the district or for the recon-
struction itself.
37
RESTORATION MASTER
PLANS
Being presented "as part of a
restoration master plan" means that:
1) a reconstructed property is an
essential component in a historic
district and 2) the reconstruction is
part of an overall restoration plan for
an entire district. "Restoration" is
defined as accurately recovering the
form and details of a property and its
setting as it appeared at a particular
period by removing later work or by
replacing missing earlier work (as
opposed to completely rebuilding the
property). The master plan for the
entire property must emphasize
restoration, not reconstruction. In
other words, the master plan for the
entire resource would not be accept-
able under this consideration if it
called for reconstruction of a majority
of the resource.
Eligible
• A reconstructed plantation
manager's office is eligible if
the office were an important
component of the plantation
and if the reconstruction is one
element in an overall plan for
restoring the plantation and if
no other building or structure
with the same associations has
survived.
• The reconstruction of the plan-
tation manager's office build-
ing can be eligible only if the
majority of buildings, struc-
tures, and objects that com-
prised the plantation are ex-
tant and are being restored.
For guidance regarding resto-
ration see the Secretary of the
Interior's Standards for Historic
Preservation Projects.
LAST SURVIVING
PROPERTY OF A TYPE
This consideration also stipulates
that a reconstruction can qualify if, in
addition to the other requirements, no
other building, object, or structure
with the same association has sur-
vived. A reconstruction that is part of
a restoration master plan is appropri-
ate only if: 1) the property is the only
one in the district with which a
particular important activity or event
has been historically associated or
2) no other property with the same
associative values has survived.
RECONSTRUCTIONS
OLDER THAN FIFTY YEARS
After the passage of fifty years, a
reconstruction may attain its own
significance for what it reveals about
the period in which it was built,
rather than the historic period it was
intended to depict. On that basis, a
reconstruction can possibly qualify
under any of the Criteria.
38
CRITERIA CONSIDERATION F:
COMMEMORATIVE PROPERTIES
A property primarily commemorative in intent can be eligible if design, age, tradition, or symbolic value has invested
it with its own historical significance.
UNDERSTANDING
CRITERIA
CONSIDERATION F:
COMMEMORATIVE
PROPERTIES
Commemorative properties are
designed or constructed after the
occurrence of an important historic
event or after the life of an important
person. They are not directly associ-
ated with the event or with the
person's productive life, but serve as
evidence of a later generation's assess-
ment of the past. Their significance
comes from their value as cultural
expressions at the date of their cre-
ation. Therefore, a commemorative
property generally must be over fifty
years old and must possess signifi-
cance based on its own value, not on
the value of the event or person being
memorialized.
Examples of Properties that MUST
Meet Criteria Consideration F:
Commemorative Properties
• A property whose sole or primary
function is commemorative or in
which the commemorative function
is of primary significance.
Examples of Properties that DO NOT
Need to Meet Criteria Consideration
F: Commemorative Properties
• A resource that has a non-
commemorative primary function
or significance.
• A single marker that is a component
of a district (whether contributing or
non-contributi ng).
APPLYING
CRITERIA
CONSIDERATION F:
COMMEMORATIVE
PROPERTIES
ELIGIBILITY FOR DESIGN
A commemorative property derives
its design from the aesthetic values of
the period of its creation. A com-
memorative property, therefore, may
be significant for the architectural,
artistic, or other design qualities of its
own period in prehistory or history.
Eligible
• A commemorative statue situ-
ated in a park or square is eli-
gible if it expresses the aesthet-
ics or craftsmanship of the pe-
riod when it was made, meet-
ing Criterion C.
• A late 19th century statue
erected on a courthouse square
to commemorate Civil War vet-
erans would qualify if it reflects
that era's shared perception of
the noble character and valor of
the veterans and their cause.
This was commonly conveyed
by portraying idealized soldiers
or allegorical figures of battle,
victory, or sacrifice.
39
ELIGIBILITY FOR AGE,
TRADITION, OR SYMBOLIC
VALUE
A commemorative property cannot
qualify for association with the event
or person it memorializes. A com-
memorative property may, however,
acquire significance after the time of
its creation through age, tradition, or
symbolic value. This significance must
be documented by accepted methods
of historical research, including
written or oral history, and must meet
one or more of the Criteria.
Eligible
• A commemorative marker
erected by a cultural group
that believed the place was the
site of its origins is eligible if,
for subsequent generations of
the group, the marker itself be-
came the focus of traditional
association with the group's
historic identity.
• A building erected as a monu-
ment to an important histori-
cal figure will qualify if
through the passage of time
the property itself has come to
symbolize the value placed
upon the individual and is
widely recognized as a re-
minder of enduring principles
or contributions valued by the
generation that erected the
monument.
• A commemorative marker
erected early in the settlement
or development of an area will
qualify if it is demonstrated
that, because of its relative
great age, the property has
long been a part of the historic
identity of the area.
Not Eligible
• A commemorative marker
erected in the past by a cul-
tural group at the site of an
event in its history would not
be eligible if the marker were
significant only for association
with the event, and it had not
become significant itself
through tradition.
• A building erected as a monu-
ment to an important histori-
cal figure would not be eligible
if its only value lay in its asso-
ciation with the individual,
and it has not come to symbol-
ize values, ideas, or contribu-
tions valued by the generation
that erected the monument.
• A commemorative marker
erected to memorialize an
event in the community's
history would not qualify sim-
ply for its association with the
event it memorialized.
INELIGIBILITY AS THE
LAST REPRESENTATIVE OF
AN EVENT OR PERSON
The loss of properties directly
associated with a significant event or
person does not strengthen the case
for consideration of a commemorative
property. Unlike birthplaces and
graves, a commemorative property
usually has no direct historic associa-
tion. The commemorative property
can qualify for historic association
only if it is clearly significant in its
own right, as stipulated above.
40
CRITERIA CONSIDERATION G:
PROPERTIES THAT HAVE
ACHIEVED SIGNIFICANCE
WITHIN THE LAST FIFTY YEARS
A property achieving significance within the last fifty years is eligible if it is of exceptional importance.
UNDERSTANDING
CRITERIA
CONSIDERATION
G: PROPERTIES
THAT HAVE
ACHIEVED
SIGNIFICANCE
WITHIN THE LAST
FIFTY YEARS
The National Register Criteria for
Evaluation exclude properties that
achieved significance within the last
fifty years unless they are of excep-
tional importance. Fifty years is a
general estimate of the time needed to
develop historical perspective and to
evaluate significance. This consider-
ation guards against the listing of
properties of passing contemporary
interest and ensures that the National
Register is a list of truly historic
places.
Examples of Properties that MUST
Meet Criteria Consideration G: Prop-
erties that Have Achieved Signifi-
cance Within the Last Fifty Years
• A property that is less than fifty
years old.
• A property that continues to achieve
significance into a period less than
fifty years before the nomination.
• A property that has non-contiguous
Periods of Significance, one of which
is less than fifty years before the
nomination.
• A property that is more than fifty
years old and had no significance
until a period less than fifty years
before the nomination.
Examples of Properties that DO NOT
Need to Meet Criteria Consideration
G: Properties that Have Achieved
Significance Within the Last Fifty
Years
• A resource whose construction be-
gan over fifty years ago, but the
completion overlaps the fifty year pe-
riod by a few years or less.
• A resource that is significant for its
plan or design, which is over fifty
years old, but the actual completion
of the project overlaps the fifty year
period by a few years.
• A historic district in which a few
properties are newer than fifty years
old, but the majority of properties
and the most important Period of
Significance are greater than fifty
years old.
9 For more information on Criteria Consideration G, refer to National Register Bulletin: Guidelines for Evaluating and Nominating Properties that Have
Achieved Significance Within the Last Fifty Years.
41
APPLYING
CRITERIA
CONSIDERATION
G: PROPERTIES
THAT HAVE
ACHIEVED
SIGNIFICANCE
WITHIN THE PAST
FIFTY YEARS
ELIGIBILITY FOR
EXCEPTIONAL
IMPORTANCE
The phrase "exceptional impor-
tance" may be applied to the extraor-
dinary importance of an event or to
an entire category of resources so
fragile that survivors of any age are
unusual. Properties listed that had
attained significance in less than fifty
years include: the launch pad at Cape
Canaveral from which men first
traveled to the moon, the home of
nationally prominent playwright
Eugene O'Neill, and the Chrysler
Building (New York) significant as the
epitome of the "Style Moderne"
architecture.
Properties less than fifty years old
that qualify as exceptional because the
entire category of resources is fragile
include a recent example of a tradi-
tional sailing canoe in the Trust
Territory of the Pacific Islands, where
because of rapid deterioration of
materials, no working Micronesian
canoes exist that are more than twenty
years old. Properties that by their
nature can last more than fifty years
cannot be considered exceptionally
important because of the fragility of
the class of resources.
The phrase "exceptional impor-
tance" does not require that the
property be of national significance.
It is a measure of a property's impor-
tance within the appropriate historic
context, whether the scale of that
context is local, State, or national.
Eligible
• The General Laundry Building
in New Orleans, one of the few
remaining Art Deco Style
buildings in that city, was
listed in the National Register
when it was forty years old be-
cause of its exceptional impor-
tance as an example of that ar-
chitectural style.
HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
A property that has achieved
significance within the past fifty years
can be evaluated only when sufficient
historical perspective exists to deter-
mine that the property is exception-
ally important. The necessary per-
spective can be provided by scholarly
research and evaluation, and must
consider both the historic context and
the specific property's role in that
context.
In many communities, properties
such as apartment buildings built in
the 1950s cannot be evaluated because
there is no scholarly research avail-
able to provide an overview of the
nature, role, and impact of that
building type within the context of
historical and architectural develop-
ments of the 1950s.
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
RUSTIC ARCHITECTURE
Properties such as structures built
in a rustic style by the National Park
Service during the 1930s and 1940s
can be evaluated because a broad
study, National Park Service Rustic
Architecture (1977), provides the
context for evaluating properties of
this type and style. Specific examples
were listed in the National Register
prior to reaching fifty years of age
when documentation concerning the
individual properties established their
significance within the historical and
architectural context of the type and
style.
VETERANS
ADMINISTRATION
HOSPITALS
Hospitals less than fifty years old
that were constructed by the Veterans
Bureau and Veterans Administration
can be evaluated because the collec-
tion of forty-eight facilities built be-
tween 1920 and 1946 has been ana-
lyzed in a study prepared by the
agency. The study provided a historic
and architectural context for develop-
ment of veteran's care within which
hospitals could be evaluated. The ex-
ceptional importance of specific indi-
vidual facilities constructed within the
past fifty years could therefore be de-
termined based on their role and their
present integrity.
COMPARISON WITH
RELATED PROPERTIES
In justifying exceptional impor-
tance, it is necessary to identify other
properties within the geographical
area that reflect the same significance
or historic associations and to deter-
mine which properties best represent
the historic context in question.
Several properties in the area could
become eligible with the passage of
time, but few will qualify now as
exceptionally important.
POST-WORLD WAR II
PROPERTIES
Properties associated with the post-
World War II era must be identified
and evaluated to determine which
ones in an area could be judged
exceptionally important. For ex-
ample, a public housing complex may
be eligible as an outstanding expres-
sion of the nation's post-war urban
policy. A military installation could
be judged exceptionally important
because of its contribution to the Cold
War arms race. A church building in
a Southern city may have served as
the pivotal rallying point for the city's
most famous civil rights protest. A
post-war suburban subdivision may
be the best reflection of contemporary
siting and design tenets in a metro-
politan area. In each case, the nomi-
nation preparer must justify the
exceptional importance of the property
relative to similar properties in the
community, State, or nation.
42
ELIGIBILITY FOR
INFORMATION POTENTIAL
A property that has achieved
significance within the past fifty years
can qualify under Criterion D only if
it can be demonstrated that the
information is of exceptional impor-
tance within the appropriate context
and that the property contains data
superior to or different from those
obtainable from other sources, includ-
ing other culturally related sites. An
archeological site less than fifty years
old may be eligible if the former
inhabitants are so poorly documented
that information about their lifeways
is best obtained from examination of
the material remains.
Eligible
• Data such as the rate of adop-
tion of modern technological
innovations by rural tenant
farmers in the 1950s may not
be obtainable through inter-
views with living persons but
could be gained by examina-
tion of homesites.
Not Eligible
• A recent archeological site
such as the remains of a
Navajo sheep corral used in
the 1950s would not be consid-
ered exceptionally significant
for its information potential on
animal husbandry if better in-
formation on the same topic is
available through ethno-
graphic studies or living infor-
mants.
HISTORIC DISTRICTS
Properties which have achieved
significance within the past fifty years
can be eligible for the National
Register if they are an integral part of
a district which qualifies for National
Register listing. This is demonstrated
by documenting that the property
dates from within the district's
defined Period of Significance and
that it is associated with one or more
of the district's defined Areas of
Significance.
Properties less than fifty years old
may be an integral part of a district
when there is sufficient perspective to
consider the properties as historic.
This is accomplished by demonstrat-
ing that: 1) the district's Period of
Significance is justified as a discrete
period with a defined beginning and
end, 2) the character of the district's
historic resources is clearly defined
and assessed, 3) specific resources in
the district are demonstrated to date
from that discrete era, and 4) the
majority of district properties are over
fifty years old. In these instances, it is
not necessary to prove exceptional
importance of either the district itself
or the less-than-fifty-year-old proper-
ties. Exceptional importance still
must be demonstrated for district
where the majority of properties or
the major Period of Significance is less
than fifty years old, and for less-than-
fifty-year-old properties which are
nominated individually.
PROPERTIES MORE THAN
FIFTY YEARS IN AGE, LESS
THAN FIFTY YEARS IN
SIGNIFICANCE
Properties that are more than fifty
years old, but whose significant
associations or qualities are less than
fifty years old, must be treated under
the fifty year consideration.
Eligible
• A building constructed early
in the twentieth century (and
having no architectural impor-
tance), but that was associated
with an important person
during the 1950s, must be
evaluated under Criteria Con-
sideration G because the Pe-
riod of Significance is within
the past fifty years. Such a
property would qualify if the
person was of exceptional im-
portance.
REQUIREMENT TO MEET
THE CRITERIA,
REGARDLESS OF AGE
Properties that are less than fifty
years old and are not exceptionally
important will not automatically
qualify for the National Register once
they are fifty years old. In order to be
listed in the National Register, all
properties, regardless of age, must be
demonstrated to meet the Criteria for
Evaluation.
43
VIII. HOW TO EVALUATE THE
INTEGRITY OF A PROPERTY
INTRODUCTION
Integrity is the ability of a prop-
erty to convey its significance. To be
listed in the National Register of
Historic Places, a property must not
only be shown to be significant under
the National Register criteria, but it
also must have integrity. The evalua-
tion of integrity is sometimes a
subjective judgment, but it must
always be grounded in an under-
standing of a property's physical
features and how they relate to its
significance.
Historic properties either retain
integrity (this is, convey their signifi-
cance) or they do not. Within the
concept of integrity, the National
Register criteria recognizes seven
aspects or qualities that, in various
combinations, define integrity.
To retain historic integrity a
property will always possess several,
and usually most, of the aspects. The
retention of specific aspects of integ-
rity is paramount for a property to
convey its significance. Determining
which of these aspects are most
important to a particular property
requires knowing why, where, and
when the property is significant. The
following sections define the seven
aspects and explain how they com-
bine to produce integrity.
SEVEN ASPECTS OF
INTEGRITY
• Location
• Design
• Setting
• Materials
• Workmanship
• Feeling
• Association
UNDERSTANDING
THE ASPECTS OF
INTEGRITY
LOCATION
Location is the place where the
historic property was constructed or
the place where the historic event
occurred. The relationship between
the property and its location is often
important to understanding why the
property was created or why some-
thing happened. The actual location
of a historic property, complemented
by its setting, is particularly important
in recapturing the sense of historic
events and persons. Except in rare
cases, the relationship between a
property and its historic associations
is destroyed if the property is moved.
(See Criteria Consideration B in Part
VII: How to Apply the Criteria Consider-
ations, for the conditions under which
a moved property can be eligible.)
DESIGN
Design is the combination of
elements that create the form, plan,
space, structure, and style of a
property. It results from conscious
decisions made during the original
conception and planning of a prop-
erty (or its significant alteration) and
applies to activities as diverse as
community planning, engineering,
architecture, and landscape architec-
ture. Design includes such elements
as organization of space, proportion,
scale, technology, ornamentation, and
materials.
A property's design reflects historic
functions and technologies as well as
aesthetics. It includes such consider-
ations as the structural system;
massing; arrangement of spaces;
pattern of fenestration; textures and
colors of surface materials; type,
amount, and style of ornamental
detailing; and arrangement and type
of plantings in a designed landscape.
Design can also apply to districts,
whether they are important primarily
for historic association, architectural
value, information potential, or a
combination thereof. For districts
significant primarily for historic
association or architectural value,
design concerns more than just the
individual buildings or structures
located within the boundaries. It also
applies to the way in which buildings,
sites, or structures are related: for
example, spatial relationships be-
tween major features; visual rhythms
in a streetscape or landscape
plantings; the layout and materials of
walkways and roads; and the relation-
ship of other features, such as statues,
water fountains, and archeological
sites.
44
SETTING
Setting is the physical environ-
ment of a historic property. Whereas
location refers to the specific place
where a property was built or an event
occurred, setting refers to the character
of the place in which the property
played its historical role. It involves
how, not just where, the property is
situated and its relationship to sur-
rounding features and open space.
Setting often reflects the basic
physical conditions under which a
property was built and the functions it
was intended to serve. In addition,
the way in which a property is posi-
tioned in its environment can reflect
the designer's concept of nature and
aesthetic preferences.
The physical features that constitute
the setting of a historic property can
be either natural or manmade, includ-
ing such elements as:
• Topographic features (a gorge or
the crest of a hill);
• Vegetation;
• Simple manmade features (paths
or fences); and
• Relationships between buildings
and other features or open space.
These features and their relation-
ships should be examined not only
within the exact boundaries of the
property, but also between the prop-
erty and its surroundings. This is
particularly important for districts.
MATERIALS
Materials are the physical ele-
ments that were combined or depos-
ited during a particular period of
time and in a particular pattern or
configuration to form a historic
property. The choice and combination
of materials reveal the preferences of
those who created the property and
indicate the availability of particular
types of materials and technologies.
Indigenous materials are often the
focus of regional building traditions
and thereby help define an area's
sense of time and place.
A property must retain the key
exterior materials dating from the
period of its historic significance. If
the property has been rehabilitated,
the historic materials and significant
features must have been preserved.
The property must also be an actual
historic resource, not a recreation; a
recent structure fabricated to look
historic is not eligible. Likewise, a
property whose historic features and
materials have been lost and then
reconstructed is usually not eligible.
(See Criteria Consideration E in Part
VII: How to Apply the Criteria Consider-
ations for the conditions under which
a reconstructed property can be
eligible.)
WORKMANSHIP
Workmanship is the physical
evidence of the crafts of a particular
culture or people during any given
period in history or prehistory. It is
the evidence of artisans' labor and
skill in constructing or altering a
building, structure, object, or site.
Workmanship can apply to the
property as a whole or to its indi-
vidual components. It can be ex-
pressed in vernacular methods of
construction and plain finishes or in
highly sophisticated configurations
and ornamental detailing. It can be
based on common traditions or
innovative period techniques.
Workmanship is important because
it can furnish evidence of the technol-
ogy of a craft, illustrate the aesthetic
principles of a historic or prehistoric
period, and reveal individual, local,
regional, or national applications of
both technological practices and
aesthetic principles. Examples of
workmanship in historic buildings
include tooling, carving, painting,
graining, turning, and joinery. Ex-
amples of workmanship in prehistoric
contexts include Paleo-Indian clovis
projectile points; Archaic period
beveled adzes; Hopewellian birdstone
pipes; copper earspools and worked
bone pendants; and Iroquoian effigy
pipes.
FEELING
Feeling is a property's expression
of the aesthetic or historic sense of a
particular period of time. It results
from the presence of physical features
that, taken together, convey the
property's historic character. For
example, a rural historic district
retaining original design, materials,
workmanship, and setting will relate
the feeling of agricultural life in the
19th century. A grouping of prehis-
toric petroglyphs, unmarred by
graffiti and intrusions and located on
its original isolated bluff, can evoke a
sense of tribal spiritual life.
ASSOCIATION
Association is the direct link
between an important historic event
or person and a historic property. A
property retains association if it is the
place where the event or activity
occurred and is sufficiently intact to
convey that relationship to an ob-
server. Like feeling, association
requires the presence of physical
features that convey a property's
historic character. For example, a
Revolutionary War battlefield whose
natural and manmade elements have
remained intact since the 18th century
will retain its quality of association
with the battle.
Because feeling and association
depend on individual perceptions,
their retention alone is never sufficient
to support eligibility of a property for
the National Register.
ASSESSING
INTEGRITY IN
PROPERTIES
Integrity is based on significance:
why, where, and when a property is
important. Only after significance is
fully established can you proceed to
the issue of integrity.
The steps in assessing integrity are:
• Define the essential physical fea-
tures that must be present for a
property to represent its signifi-
cance.
• Determine whether the essential
physical features are visible
enough to convey their signifi-
cance.
• Determine whether the property
needs to be compared with simi-
lar properties. And,
• Determine, based on the signifi-
cance and essential physical fea-
tures, which aspects of integrity
are particularly vital to the prop-
erty being nominated and if they
are present.
Ultimately, the question of integ-
rity is answered by whether or not the
property retains the identity for
which it is significant.
45
DEFINING THE ESSENTIAL
PHYSICAL FEATURES
All properties change over time. It
is not necessary for a property to
retain all its historic physical features
or characteristics. The property must
retain, however, the essential physical
features that enable it to convey its
historic identity. The essential
physical features are those features
that define both why a property is
significant (Applicable Criteria and
Areas of Significance) and when it was
significant (Periods of Significance).
They are the features without which a
property can no longer be identified
as, for instance, a late 19th century
dairy barn or an early 20th century
commercial district.
CRITERIA A AND B
A property that is significant for its
historic association is eligible if it
retains the essential physical features
that made up its character or appear-
ance during the period of its associa-
tion with the important event, histori-
cal pattern, or person(s). If the
property is a site (such as a treaty site)
where there are no material cultural
remains, the setting must be intact.
Archeological sites eligible under
Criteria A and B must be in overall
good condition with excellent preser-
vation of features, artifacts, and
spatial relationships to the extent that
these remains are able to convey
important associations with events or
persons.
CRITERION C
A property important for illustrat-
ing a particular architectural style or
construction technique must retain
most of the physical features that
constitute that style or technique. A
property that has lost some historic
materials or details can be eligible if it
retains the majority of the features
that illustrate its style in terms of the
massing, spatial relationships, propor-
tion, pattern of windows and doors,
texture of materials, and ornamenta-
tion. The property is not eligible,
however, if it retains some basic
features conveying massing but has
lost the majority of the features that
once characterized its style.
Archeological sites eligible under
Criterion C must be in overall good
condition with excellent preservation
of features, artifacts, and spatial
relationships to the extent that these
remains are able to illustrate a site
type, time period, method of construc-
tion, or work of a master.
CRITERION D
For properties eligible under
Criterion D, including archeological
sites and standing structures studied
for their information potential, less
attention is given to their overall
condition, than it they were being
considered under Criteria A, B, or C.
Archeological sites, in particular, do
not exist today exactly as they were
formed. There are always cultural
and natural processes that alter the
deposited materials and their spatial
relationships.
For properties eligible under
Criterion D, integrity is based upon
the property's potential to yield
specific data that addresses important
research questions, such as those
identified in the historic context
documentation in the Statewide
Comprehensive Preservation Plan or
in the research design for projects
meeting the Secretary of the Interior's
Standards for Archeological Documenta-
tion.
INTERIORS
Some historic buildings are virtu-
ally defined by their exteriors, and
their contribution to the built environ-
ment can be appreciated even if their
interiors are not accessible. Examples
of this would include early examples
of steel-framed skyscraper construc-
tion. The great advance in American
technology and engineering made by
these buildings can be read from the
outside. The change in American
popular taste during the 19th century,
from the symmetry and simplicity of
architectural styles based on classical
precedents, to the expressions of High
Victorian styles, with their combina-
tion of textures, colors, and asym-
metrical forms, is readily apparent
from the exteriors of these buildings.
Other buildings "are" interiors.
The Cleveland Arcade, that soaring
19th century glass-covered shopping
area, can only be appreciated from the
inside. Other buildings in this
category would be the great covered
train sheds of the 19th century.
In some cases the loss of an interior
will disqualify properties from listing
in the National Register—a historic
concert hall noted for the beauty of its
auditorium and its fine acoustic
qualities would be the type of prop-
erty that if it were to lose its interior,
it would lose its value as a historic
resource. In other cases, the over-
arching significance of a property's
exterior can overcome the adverse
effect of the loss of an interior.
In borderline cases particular
attention is paid to the significance of
the property and the remaining
historic features.
HISTORIC DISTRICTS
For a district to retain integrity as a
whole, the majority of the compo-
nents that make up the district's
historic character must possess
integrity even if they are individually
undistinguished. In addition, the
relationships among the district's
components must be substantially
unchanged since the period of signifi-
cance.
When evaluating the impact of
intrusions upon the district's integ-
rity, take into consideration the
relative number, size, scale, design,
and location of the components that
do not contribute to the significance.
A district is not eligible if it contains
so many alterations or new intrusions
that it no longer conveys the sense of
a historic environment.
A component of a district cannot
contribute to the significance if:
• it has been substantially altered
since the period of the district's
significance or
• it does not share the historic asso-
ciations of the district.
VISIBILITY OF PHYSICAL
FEATURES
Properties eligible under Criteria
A, B, and C must not only retain their
essential physical features, but the
features must be visible enough to
convey their significance. This means
that even if a property is physically
intact, its integrity is questionable if
its significant features are concealed
under modern construction. Archeo-
logical properties are often the
exception to this; by nature they
usually do not require visible features
to convey their significance.
46
NON-HISTORIC EXTERIORS SUNKEN VESSELS
If the historic exterior building
material is covered by non-historic
material (such as modern siding), the
property can still be eligible if the
significant form, features, and detail-
ing are not obscured. If a property's
exterior is covered by a non-historic
false-front or curtain wall, the prop-
erty will not qualify under Criteria A,
B, or C, because it does not retain the
visual quality necessary to convey
historic or architectural significance.
Such a property also cannot be
considered a contributing element in a
historic district, because it does not
add to the district's sense of time and
place. If the false front, curtain wall,
or non-historic siding is removed and
the original building materials are
intact, then the property's integrity
can be re-evaluated.
PROPERTY CONTAINED
WITHIN ANOTHER
PROPERTY
Some properties contain an earlier
structure that formed the nucleus for
later construction. The exterior
property, if not eligible in its own
right, can qualify on the basis of the
interior property only if the interior
property can yield significant infor-
mation about a specific construction
technique or material, such as
rammed earth or tabby. The interior
property cannot be used as the basis
for eligibility if it has been so altered
that it no longer contains the features
that could provide important infor-
mation, or if the presence of impor-
tant information cannot be demon-
strated.
A sunken vessel can be eligible
under Criterion C as embodying the
distinctive characteristics of a method
of construction if it is structurally
intact. A deteriorated sunken vessel,
no longer structurally intact, can be
eligible under Criterion D if the
remains of either the vessel or its
contents is capable of yielding signifi-
cant information. For further infor-
mation, refer to National Register
Bulletin: Nominating Historic Vessels
and Shipwrecks to the National Register
of Historic Places.
Natural Features
A natural feature that is associated
with a historic event or trend, such as
a rock formation that served as a trail
marker during westward expansion,
must retain its historic appearance,
unobscured by modern construction
or landfill. Otherwise it is not eli-
gible, even though it remains intact.
COMPARING SIMILAR
PROPERTIES
For some properties, comparison
with similar properties should be
considered during the evaluation of
integrity. Such comparison may be
important in deciding what physical
features are essential to properties of
that type. In instances where it has
not been determined what physical
features a property must possess in
order for it to reflect the significance
of a historic context, comparison with
similar properties should be under-
taken during the evaluation of integ-
rity. This situation arises when
scholarly work has not been done on a
particular property type or when
surviving examples of a property type
are extremely rare. (See Comparing
Related Properties in Part V: How to
Evaluate a Property within its Historic
Context.)
RARE EXAMPLES OF A
PROPERTY TYPE
Comparative information is
particularly important to consider
when evaluating the integrity of a
property that is a rare surviving
example of its type. The property
must have the essential physical
features that enable it to convey its
historic character or information. The
rarity and poor condition, however, of
other extant examples of the type may
justify accepting a greater degree of
alteration or fewer features, provided
that enough of the property survives
for it to be a significant resource.
Eligible
• A one-room schoolhouse that
has had all original exterior
siding replaced and a replace-
ment roof that does not exactly
replicate the original roof pro-
file can be eligible if the other
extant rare examples have re-
ceived an even greater degree
of alteration, such as the sub-
division of the original one-
room plan.
Not Eligible
• A mill site contains informa-
tion on how site patterning re-
flects historic functional re-
quirements, but parts of the
site have been destroyed. The
site is not eligible for its infor-
mation potential if a compari-
son of other mill sites reveals
more intact properties with
complete information.
47
DETERMINING THE
RELEVANT ASPECTS OF
INTEGRITY
Each type of property depends on
certain aspects of integrity, more than
others, to express its historic signifi-
cance. Determining which of the
aspects is most important to a particu-
lar property requires an understand-
ing of the property's significance and
its essential physical features.
CRITERIA A AND B
A property important for associa-
tion with an event, historical pattern,
or person(s) ideally might retain some
features of all seven aspects of integ-
rity: location, design, setting, materi-
als, workmanship, feeling, and
association. Integrity of design and
workmanship, however, might not be
as important to the significance, and
would not be relevant if the property
were a site. A basic integrity test for a
property associated with an important
event or person is whether a historical
contemporary would recognize the
property as it exists today.
For archeological sites that are
eligible under Criteria A and B, the
seven aspects of integrity can be
applied in much the same way as they
are to buildings, structures, or objects.
It is important to note, however, that
the site must have demonstrated its
ability to convey its significance, as
opposed to sites eligible under Crite-
rion D where only the potential to
yield information is required.
Eligible
A mid-19th century waterpowered
mill important for its association
with an area's industrial develop-
ment is eligible if:
• it is still on its original site
(Location), and
• the important features of its
setting are intact (Setting), and
• it retains most of its historic
materials (Materials), and
• it has the basic features expres-
sive of its design and function,
such as configuration, propor-
tions, and window pattern
(Design).
Not Eligible
A mid-19th century water-
powered mill important for its
association with an area's indus-
trial development is not eligible
if:
• it has been moved (Location,
Setting, Feeling, and Associa-
tion), or
• substantial amounts of new
materials have been incorpo-
rated (Materials, Workman-
ship, and Feeling), or
• it no longer retains basic de-
sign features that convey its
historic appearance or
function (Design, Workman-
ship, and Feeling).
CRITERION C
A property significant under
Criterion C must retain those physi-
cal features that characterize the type,
period, or method of construction that
the property represents. Retention of
design, workmanship, and materials
will usually be more important than
location, setting, feeling, and associa-
tion. Location and setting will be
important, however, for those proper-
ties whose design is a reflection of
their immediate environment (such as
designed landscapes and bridges).
For archeological sites that are
eligible under Criterion C, the seven
aspects of integrity can be applied in
much the same way as they are to
buildings, structures, or objects. It is
important to note, however, that the
site must have demonstrated its ability
to convey its significance, as opposed
to sites eligible under Criterion D
where only the potential to yield
information is required.
Eligible
A 19th century wooden covered
bridge, important for illustrating
a construction type, is eligible if:
• the essential features of its de-
sign are intact, such as abut-
ments, piers, roof configura-
tion, and trusses (Design,
Workmanship, and Feeling),
and
• most of the historic materials
are present (Materials, Work-
manship, and Feeling), and
• evidence of the craft of
wooden bridge technology re-
mains, such as the form and
assembly technique of the
trusses (Workmanship).
• Since the design of a bridge re-
lates directly to its function as
a transportation crossing, it is
also important that the bridge
still be situated over a water-
way (Setting, Location, Feel-
ing, and Association).
Not Eligible
For a 19th century wooden cov-
ered bridge, important for its
construction type, replacement
of some materials of the flooring,
siding, and roofing would not
necessarily damage its integrity.
Integrity would be lost, however,
if:
• the abutments, piers, or trusses
were substantially altered (De-
sign, Workmanship, and Feel-
ing) or
• considerable amounts of new
materials were incorporated
(Materials, Workmanship,
and Feeling).
• Because environment is a
strong factor in the design of
this property type, the bridge
would also be ineligible if it no
longer stood in a place that
conveyed its function as a
crossing (Setting, Location,
Feeling, and Association).
48
CRITERION D
For properties eligible under
Criterion D, setting and feeling may
not have direct bearing on the
property's ability to yield important
information. Evaluation of integrity
probably will focus primarily on the
location, design, materials, and
perhaps workmanship.
Eligible
A multicomponent prehistoric
site important for yielding data
on changing subsistence patterns
can be eligible if:
• floral or faunal remains are
found in clear association with
cultural material (Materials
and Association) and
• the site exhibits stratigraphic
separation of cultural compo-
nents (Location).
Not Eligible
A multicomponent prehistoric
site important for yielding data
on changing subsistence patterns
would not be eligible if:
• floral or faunal remains were
so badly decomposed as to
make identification impossible
(Materials), or
• floral or faunal remains were
disturbed in such a manner as
to make their association with
cultural remains ambiguous
(Association), or
• the site has lost its strati-
graphic context due to subse-
quent land alterations
(Location).
Eligible
A lithic scatter site important for
yielding data on lithic technology
during the Late Archaic period
can be eligible if:
• the site contains lithic
debitage, finished stone tools,
hammerstones, or antler
flakers (Material and Design),
and
• the site contains datable mate-
rial (Association).
Not Eligible
A lithic scatter site important for
yielding data on lithic technology
during the Late Archaic period
would not be eligible if:
• the site contains natural de-
posits of lithic materials that
are impossible to distinguish
from culturally modified lithic
material (Design) or
• the site does not contain any
temporal diagnostic evidence
that could link the site to the
Late Archaic period (Associa-
tion).
49
IX. SUMMARY OF THE
NATIONAL HISTORIC
LANDMARKS CRITERIA FOR
EVALUATION
A property being nominated to the
National Register may also merit
consideration for potential designa-
tion as a National Historic Landmark.
Such consideration is dependent upon
the stringent application of the
following distinct set of criteria
(found in the Code of Federal Regula-
tions, Title 36, Part 65).
NATIONAL
HISTORIC
LANDMARKS
CRITERIA
The quality of national significance
is ascribed to districts, sites, buildings,
structures, and objects that possess
exceptional value or quality in illus-
trating or interpreting the heritage of
the United States in history, architec-
ture, archeology, engineering, and
culture and that possess a high degree
of integrity of location, design,
setting, materials, workmanship,
feeling, and association, and:
1. That are associated with events
that have made a significant con-
tribution to, and are identified
with, or that outstandingly repre-
sent, the broad national patterns
of United States history and from
which an understanding and ap-
preciation of those patterns may
be gained; or
2. That are associated importantly
with the lives of persons nation-
ally significant in the history of
the United States; or
3. That represent some great idea
or ideal of the American people;
or
4. That embody the distinguishing
characteristics of an architectural
type specimen exceptionally
valuable for a study of a period,
style or method of construction,
or that represent a significant,
distinctive and exceptional entity
whose components may lack in-
dividual distinction; or
5. That are composed of integral
parts of the environment not suf-
ficiently significant by reason of
historical association or artistic
merit to warrant individual rec-
ognition but collectively compose
an entity of exceptional historical
or artistic significance, or out-
standingly commemorate or il-
lustrate a way of life or culture;
or
6. That have yielded or may be
likely to yield information of ma-
jor scientific importance by re-
vealing new cultures, or by shed-
ding light upon periods of occu-
pation over large areas of the
United States. Such sites are
those which have yielded, or
which may reasonably be ex-
pected to yield, data affecting
theories, concepts and ideas to a
major degree.
NATIONAL
HISTORIC
LANDMARK
EXCLUSIONS
Ordinarily, cemeteries, birthplaces,
graves of historical figures, properties
owned by religious institutions or
used for religious purposes, structures
that have been moved from their
original locations, reconstructed his-
toric buildings and properties that
have achieved significance within the
past fifty years are not eligible for des-
ignation. If such properties fall
within the following categories they
may, nevertheless, be found to
qualify:
1. A religious property deriving its
primary national significance
from architectural or artistic dis-
tinction or historical importance;
or
2. A building or structure removed
from its original location but
which is nationally significant
primarily for its architectural
merit, or for association with per-
sons or events of transcendent
importance in the nation's his-
tory and the association conse-
quential; or
3. A site of a building or structure
no longer standing but the per-
son or event associated with it is
of transcendent importance in the
nations's history and the associa-
tion consequential; or
50
4. A birthplace, grave or burial if it
is of a historical figure of tran-
scendent national significance
and no other appropriate site,
building, or structure directly as-
sociated with the productive life
of that person exists; or
5. A cemetery that derives its pri-
mary national significance from
graves of persons of transcendent
importance, or from an exception-
ally distinctive design or an ex-
ceptionally significant event; or
6. A reconstructed building or en-
semble o^ buildings of extraordi-
nary national significance when
accurately executed in a suitable
environment and presented in a
dignified manner as part of a res-
toration master plan, and when
no other buildings or structures
with the same association have
survived; or
7. A property primarily commemo-
rative in intent if design, age, tra-
dition, or symbolic value has in-
vested it with its own national
historical significance; or
8. A property achieving national
significance within the past 50
years if it is of extraordinary na-
tional importance.
COMPARING THE
NATIONAL
HISTORIC
LANDMARKS
CRITERIA AND THE
NATIONAL
REGISTER
CRITERIA
In general, the instructions for
preparing a National Register nomina-
tion and the guidelines stated in this
bulletin for applying the National
Register Criteria also apply to Land-
mark nominations and the use of the
Landmark criteria. While there are
specific distinctions discussed below,
Parts IV and V of this bulletin apply
equally to National Register listings
and Landmark nominations. That is,
the categories of historic properties are
defined the same way; historic con-
texts are identified similarly; and
comparative evaluation is carried out
on the same principles enumerated in
Part V.
There are some differences between
National Register and National
Historic Landmarks Criteria. The
following is an explanation of how
each Landmark Criterion compares
with its National Register Criteria
counterpart:
CRITERION 1
This Criterion relates to National
Register Criterion A. Both cover
properties associated with events.
The Landmark Criterion, however,
requires that the events associated
with the property be outstandingly
represented by that property and that
the property be related to the broad
national patterns of U.S. history.
Thus, the quality of the property to
convey and interpret its meaning
must be of a higher order and must
relate to national themes rather than
the narrower context of State or local
themes.
CRITERION 2
This Criterion relates to National
Register Criterion B. Both cover
properties associated with significant
people. The Landmark Criterion
differs in that it specifies that the
association of a person to the property
in question be an important one and
that the person associated with the
property be of national significance.
CRITERION 3
This Criterion has no counterpart
among the National Register Criteria.
It is rarely, if ever, used alone. While
not a landmark at present, the Liberty
Bell is an object that might be consid-
ered under this Criterion. The appli-
cation of this Criterion obviously
requires the most careful scrutiny and
would apply only in rare instances
involving ideas and ideals of the
highest order.
CRITERION 4
This Criterion relates to National
Register Criterion C. Its intent is to
qualify exceptionally important works
of architecture or collective elements
of architecture extraordinarily signifi-
cant as an ensemble, such as a historic
district. Note that the language is
more restrictive than that of the
National Register Criterion in requir-
ing that a candidate in architecture be
"a specimen exceptionally valuable for
the study of a period, style, or method
of construction" rather than simply
embodying distinctive characteristics
of a type, period, or method of con-
struction. With regard to historic
districts, the Landmarks Criterion
requires an entity that is distinctive
and exceptional. Unlike National
Register Criterion C, this Criterion will
not qualify the works of a master, per
se, but only such works which are
exceptional or extraordinary. Artistic
value is considered only in the context
of history's judgement in order to
avoid current conflicts of taste.
CRITERION 5
This Criterion does not have a strict
counterpart among the National
Register Criteria. It may seem redun-
dant of the latter part of Landmark
Criterion 4. It is meant to cover
collective entities such as Greenfield
Village and historic districts like New
Bedford, Massachusetts, which qualify
for their collective association with a
nationally significant event, move-
ment, or broad pattern of national
development.
CRITERION 6
The National Register counterpart
of this is Criterion D. Criterion 6 was
developed specifically to recognize
archeological sites. All such sites must
address this Criterion. The following
are the qualifications that distinguish
this Criterion from its National Regis-
ter counterpart: the information
yielded or likely to be yielded must be
of major scientific importance by
revealing new cultures, or by shedding
light upon periods of occupation over
large areas of the United States. Such
sites should be expected to yield data
affecting theories, concepts, and ideas to a
major degree.
The data recovered or expected to
be recovered must make a major
contribution to the existing corpus of
information. Potentially recoverable
data must be likely to revolutionize or
substantially modify a major theme in
history or prehistory, resolve a sub-
stantial historical or anthropological
debate, or close a serious gap in a
major theme of U. S. history or prehis-
tory.
51
EXCLUSIONS AND
EXCEPTIONS TO
THE EXCLUSIONS
This section of the National His-
toric Landmarks Criteria has its
counterpart in the National Register's
"Criteria Considerations/' The most
abundant difference between them is
the addition of the qualifiers "na-
tional," "exceptional," or "extraordi-
nary" before the word significance.
Other than this, the following are the
most notable distinctions:
EXCLUSION 2
Buildings moved from their
original location, qualify only if one of
two conditions are met: 1) the build-
ing is nationally significant for
architecture, or 2) the persons or
events with which they are associated
are of transcendent national signifi-
cance and the association is conse-
quential.
Transcendent significance means
an order of importance higher than
that which would ordinarily qualify a
person or event to be nationally
significant. A consequential associa-
tion is a relationship to a building that
had an evident impact on events,
rather than a connection that was
incidental and passing.
EXCLUSION 3
This pertains to the site of a struc-
ture no longer standing. There is no
counterpart to this exclusion in the
National Register Criteria. In order
for such a property to qualify for
Landmark designation it must meet
the second condition cited for Exclu-
sion 2.
EXCLUSION 4
This exclusion relates to Criteria
Consideration C of the National
Register Criteria. The only difference
is that a burial place qualifies for
Landmark designation only if, in
addition to other factors, the person
buried is of transcendent national
importance.
When evaluating properties at the
national level for designation as a
National Historic Landmark, please
refer to the National Historic Land-
marks outline, History and Prehistory
in the National Park System and the
National Historic Landmarks Program,
1987. (For more information about
the National Historic Landmarks
program, please write to Department
of the Interior, National Park Service,
National Historic Landmarks, 1849 C
Street, NW, NC400, Washington, DC
20240.)
52
X. GLOSSARY
Associative Qualities - An aspect of a
property's history that links it with
historic events, activities, or
persons.
Code of Federal Regulations -
Commonly referred to as "CFR."
The part containing the National
Register Criteria is usually referred
to as 36 CFR 60, and is available
from the National Park Service.
CLG - Certified Local Government.
Culture - A group of people linked
together by shared values, beliefs,
and historical associations, together
with the group's social institutions
and physical objects necessary to
the operation of the institution.
Cultural Resource - See Historic
Resource.
Evaluation - Process by which the
significance and integrity of a
historic property are judged and
eligibility for National Register
listing is determined.
Historic Context - An organizing
structure for interpreting history
that groups information about
historic properties that share a
common theme, common geo-
graphical area, and a common time
period. The development of
historic contexts is a foundation for
decisions about the planning,
identification, evaluation, registra-
tion, and treatment of historic
properties, based upon compara-
tive historic significance.
Historic Integrity - The unimpaired
ability of a property to convey its
historical significance.
Historic Property - See Historic
Resource.
Historic Resource - Building, site,
district, object, or structure evalu-
ated as historically significant.
Identification - Process through
which information is gathered
about historic properties.
Listing - The formal entry of a prop-
erty in the National Register of
Historic Places. See also, Registra-
tion.
Nomination - Official recommenda-
tion for listing a property in the
National Register of Historic
Places.
Property Type - A grouping o^
properties defined by common
physical and associative attributes.
Registration - Process by which a
historic property is documented
and nominated or determined
eligible for listing in the National
Register.
Research Design - A statement of
proposed identification, documen-
tation, investigation, or other
treatment of a historic property
that identifies the project's goals,
methods and techniques, expected
results, and the relationship of the
expected results to other proposed
activities or treatments.
53
XL LIST OF NATIONAL
REGISTER BULLETINS
The Basics
How to Apply National Register Criteria for Evaluation *
Guidelines for Completing National Register of Historic Places Form
Part A: How to Complete the National Register Form *
Part B: How to Complete the National Register Multiple Property Documentation Form *
Researching a Historic Property *
Property Types
Guidelines for Evaluating and Documenting Historic Aids to Navigation *
Guidelines for Identifying, Evaluating and Registering America's Historic Battlefields
Guidelines for Evaluating and Registering Historical Archeological Sites
Guidelines for Evaluating and Documenting Historic Aviation Properties
Guidelines for Evaluating and Registering Cemeteries and Burial Places
How to Evaluate and Nominate Designed Historic Landscapes *
Guidelines for Identifying, Evaluating and Registering Historic Mining Sites
How to Apply National Register Criteria to Post Offices *
Guidelines for Evaluating and Documenting Properties Associated with Significant Persons
Guidelines for Evaluating and Documenting Properties That Have Achieved Significance Within the Last Fifty Years *
Guidelines for Evaluating and Documenting Rural Historic Landscapes *
Guidelines for Evaluating and Documenting Traditional Cultural Properties *
Nominating Historic Vessels and Shipwrecks to the National Register of Historic Places
Technical Assistance
Defining Boundaries for National Register Properties*
Guidelines for Local Surveys: A Basis for Preservation Planning *
How to Improve the Quality of Photographs for National Register Nominations
National Register Casebook: Examples of Documentation *
Using the UTM Grid System to Record Historic Sites
To order these publications, write to: National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 1849 C St., NC 400, NW, Washington, D.C. 20240, or
e-mail at: nr_reference@nps.gov. Publications marked with an asterisk (*) are also available in electronic form at www.cr.nps.gov/nr.
,_ . o U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 2005—717-788
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Update from Sign Subcommittee.
ITEM SUMMARY:
The Sign Subcommittee Chair will provide an update of recently issued CDCs for business
signage.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
NA
SUBMITTED BY:
Matt Synatschk, Historic Planner
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Briefing of Customer Bulletins 112: Certificate of Design Compliance Process, 113: Certificate of
Design Compliance for Demolition or Relocation of a Structure Process, and 114: Procedures for
completing and submitting a Certificate of Design Compliance Application (Submittal
Requirements).
ITEM SUMMARY:
As a customer service initiative, the City's Planning Department issues Customer Bulletins to
further explain department operations and procedures to better assist the customers. Recently, the
Planning and Downtown and Community Services departments created a set of CBs to provide
clarity and guidelines to property and business owners of property within a Historic Overlay
District or of a structure listed in the Historic Resources Survey on the current Certificate of
Design Compliance (CDC) application submittal and review process. These CBs provide an
overview of the CDC (CB 112) and CDC for Demolition or Relocation of a Structure processes
(CB 113), and clarifies the application submittal requirements for a CDC application (CB114).
A copy of these and other bulletins are available online in the Planning Department's website at
planning.georgetown.org/planning-department-correspondence/.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None.
SUBMITTED BY:
Andreina Dávila-Quintero, Project Coordinator
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
CB 112: The CDC Process Exhibit
CB 113: The CDC for Demolition or Relocation of a Structure
Process Exhibit
CB 114: Procedures for completing and submitting a CDC
Application (Submittal Requirements)
Exhibit
CB 112 – CDC Process Page 1 of 7
Issued: May 6, 2014
TO: Planning and Downtown and Community Services departments Customers
SUBJECT: Customer Bulletin #112 – The Certificate of Design Compliance (“CDC”) Process
DATE: May 6, 2014
This Customer Bulletin was created as a customer service initiative to provide a guide on the
Certificate of Design Compliance (“CDC”) process to property and business owners located
within the Downtown and Old Town Overlay districts.
A location map of each overlay district and of properties listed in the Historic Resources Survey
may be viewed online using the City’s interactive online maps located at
https://maps.georgetown.org/interactive-maps/ (Geoguide: Historic Resources Survey Map).
Information available includes the district boundaries, as well as a structure’s level of priority,
construction year, architect, architectural style and building materials.
For questions and further information, please contact the Historic Planner at (512) 930-3581.
THE CDC PROCESS
Sections 3.13, 4.08, 4.09 and 4.10 of the City’s Unified Development Code (“UDC”) outline the
applicability, regulations, review process, and approval criteria of a CDC. The UDC may be
viewed online at https://udc.georgetown.org/unified-development-code/.
In accordance with UDC Sections 3.13.010(A)(1) and (B), 4.08.010(C), 4.09.020(B) and 4.10.010(B),
a CDC is required before a property may be developed or work is made upon any building or
structure under the circumstances identified in the table below:
TYPE OF REQUEST TOWN SQUARE HISTORIC
& DOWNTOWN OVERLAY
DISTRICTS
OLD TOWN OVERLAY
DISTRICT
Awnings and Canopies (single and two-
dwelling unit uses/structures)
Awnings and Canopies (all other
uses/structures)
Demolition of a historic resource*
CB 112 – CDC Process Page 2 of 7
Issued: May 6, 2014
TYPE OF REQUEST TOWN SQUARE HISTORIC
& DOWNTOWN OVERLAY
DISTRICTS
OLD TOWN OVERLAY
DISTRICT
Demolition or Relocation of a historic
structure†
Demolition or removal of a building
façade with street frontage (single and
two-dwelling unit uses/structures)
Exterior Building or Site Alterations (single
and two-dwelling unit uses/structures)‡
Exterior Building or Site Alterations (all
other uses/structures)‡
Exterior Paint Color (single and two-
dwelling unit uses/structures)
Exterior Paint Color (all other
uses/structures)
Fence (related to a non-residential outside
eating or sitting area, or front yard fence)
Landscaping (not applicable to single-
family and two-family residential uses)
New Construction - Additions (single and
two-dwelling unit uses/structures)
(only required if addition is made to a street
facing façade; or
if the single or two-dwelling unit structure
exceeds the height, setback or FAR limitations of
the Overlay)
New Construction - Additions (all other
uses/structures)
New Construction – Infill (single and two-
dwelling unit uses/structures)
(only if the single or two-dwelling unit structure
exceeds the height, setback or FAR limitations of
the Overlay)
New Construction - Infill (all other
uses/structures)
(only for non-residential uses, or if the property is
in the TH, MF or other non-residential base
zoning district)
Ordinary Maintenance and Repair§
Signage
*Historic Resource is any property, structure, feature, object or district that is determined to be of historical significance.
†Demolition or Relocation of a Historic Structure listed in the Historic Resources Survey requires the approval of a CDC
regardless if the property is located in the Downtown or Old Town Overlay Districts. For additional information on the CDC for
Demolition process, please refer to Customer Bulletin 113 available online at https://planning.georgetown.org/planning-
department-correspondence/.
‡Exterior Building or Site Alterations only include the following: alteration or restoration of any exterior features of a historic
resource; applying a new exterior siding material; adding a new window, door or dormer; a change to the dimensions or
configuration of the roof height or building footprint; a change in the primary structural frame or secondary members of a
CB 112 – CDC Process Page 3 of 7
Issued: May 6, 2014
building, such as columns, beams and girders; creating a driveway or parking area; adding mechanical equipment; building or
enclosing a porch, carport, deck, fence or garage; and adding outdoor heaters or electronic items.
§Ordinary Maintenance and Repair is any work, the sole purpose of which is to prevent or correct deterioration, decay or
damage, including repair of damage caused by fire or other disaster and which does not result in a change in the existing
appearance and materials of a property.
The CDC process takes approximately thirty-five (35) days from application submittal to final
decision (see attached EXHIBIT). However, please note that projects that require further review
may require additional processing time. All CDC requests will be reviewed and approved by
the Historic and Architectural Review Commission (“HARC”) with the exception of
landscaping, residential fences, exterior paint colors for residential properties in the Downtown
Overlay District and demolition of a non-historic accessory structure, which are reviewed
administratively (Administrative CDCs).
Please be advised that any development or modification to a property or structure located in
one of the historic districts must comply with the applicable UDC regulations and should be
consistent with the Downtown and Old Town Guidelines, as amended, even when a CDC is not
required for the proposed scope of work.
Pre-Application Conference
Prior to submitting a CDC application, a request for a Pre-Application Conference must be
completed and submitted to the Planning Department to schedule a meeting with appropriate
staff members. Pre-Application Conference Request forms may be submitted in person at 300-1
Industrial Avenue, or via email at planning@georgetown.org. The purpose of this meeting is to
provide an applicant the opportunity to present the proposed project to City Staff, and obtain
the City’s professional opinion and input on potential code requirements and procedures that
an applicant must undertake to complete the project. There is no fee associated with a request
for a Pre-Application Conference. Additional information about the Pre-Application Conference
may be found in Customer Bulletin 109 available online at
http://planning.georgetown.org/planning-department-correspondence/.
When completing the request form, it is highly recommended that the applicant provide as
much detail and information as possible. Once the Pre-Application Conference is complete, an
applicant will have up to ninety (90) days from the date of the staff comments and signature(s)
to submit the related applications or a new Pre-Application Conference will be required. The
Pre-Application Conference Request form is available online at
http://udc.georgetown.org/development-manual/.
HARC Pre-Application Conceptual Review
Infill construction, substantial rehabilitation of an existing structure and other major projects,
require conceptual review by the HARC of the proposed scope of work prior to submitting an
official CDC application. For this purpose, major projects are determined by the value of the
proposed scope of work. If the value of the scope of work exceeds fifty percent (50%) of the
market value of the structure as determined by the Williamson County Appraisal District,
conceptual review by the HARC will be required.
CB 112 – CDC Process Page 4 of 7
Issued: May 6, 2014
The HARC Pre-Application Conceptual Review is in addition to the Pre-Application
Conference with staff referenced in the section above, as other requirements and procedures
may be applicable (depending on the scope of work) that are beyond the purview of the HARC.
Both meetings may be scheduled simultaneously and do not require consideration by one prior
to the other. Materials for the conceptual review must be submitted in digital format (PDF) at
least seven (7) days before the regularly scheduled HARC meeting. Requests for Conceptual
Review and supporting materials may be submitted to the Planning Department in person at
300-1 Industrial Avenue, or via email at planning@georgetown.org. To learn if your project will
require conceptual review by the HARC, please contact the City’s Historic Planner at (512) 930-
3581.
Application Submittal
In order to facilitate the application submittal process, completed applications may be
submitted at any time. Submittal of a complete application includes the Application Form, all
supporting documents as listed in the application checklist, and applicable fees. For
applications that require HARC review and consideration, it is recommended that an
application be submitted a minimum of thirty-five (35) days prior to a scheduled HARC Public
Hearing. This is to allow for sufficient time to review the application, create the HARC staff
report and packet when applicable, and comply with the public notice requirements of UDC
Section 3.03. The City strives to process your request efficiently to avoid any unnecessary
delays; however, please be advised that projects that require further review may require
additional processing time.
Completeness Review
Upon receipt of an application, City Staff will review all submitted information within five (5)
working days to determine if the minimum items needed for proper review (submittal
requirements) are present in the application packet. In the event the application is deemed
incomplete, a list of missing items will be provided to the applicant in writing. Additionally,
the request will be placed on hold and not scheduled for consideration by the HARC, when
applicable, until such time the missing items are submitted and the application is deemed
complete. When the application is deemed complete, the request will proceed to technical
review and be placed on the next available HARC Public Hearing agenda, when applicable.
Technical Review
Technical review of the application consists of the review of the request to determine if and how
the proposed scope of work meets the approval criteria outlined in the UDC and the Downtown
and Old Town Design Guidelines. City staff may contact the applicant to obtain additional
information, further clarification or revisions of the plans if deemed necessary. Please be
advised that a site visit may be completed by staff during this time.
Administrative CDCs will be issued upon completion of the technical review no earlier than
fifteen (15) days after the posted notice, provided the UDC approval criteria are met and the
request complies with the Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines. Appeals of an
CB 112 – CDC Process Page 5 of 7
Issued: May 6, 2014
administratively issued CDC will be considered by the HARC in accordance with procedures
established for new applications. Such appeal must be submitted within fifteen (15) days of an
administrative action.
For CDC applications that require consideration by the HARC, staff will draft a
recommendation to the HARC as part of the staff report that is written during this stage of the
review process.
Public Notification
In accordance with Section 3.03.010(D) of the UDC, all CDC applications require public
notification. Each applicant is required to post public notice of the CDC application no less than
fifteen (15) days prior to the expected date City Staff will make a determination or the
scheduled HARC public hearing, as applicable, on the property. The public notice to post on the
property will be provided by City Staff and may be picked-up at the Planning Department,
located at 300-1 Industrial Avenue, Georgetown, Texas 78626. City Staff will notify the applicant
when the sign(s) is(are) ready for pick-up. Please note that public notice signs must be kept on
the property until final action is made by City Staff or the HARC, as applicable. It is the
responsibility of the applicant to remove the sign(s) after City Staff or the HARC takes final
action.
In addition, CDC applications that require administrative review will be posted online fifteen
(15) days prior to making a final decision for public review/comment to comply with the Public
Notification requirements of the UDC [Section 3.03.010(D)].
HARC
The HARC Public Hearing includes the presentation of the staff recommendation, explanation
of the proposed scope of work by the applicant and/or property owner [up to ten (10) minutes],
and public comments in support or in opposition of the request. During the public hearing, each
constituent that signs up to speak on the request will have three (3) minutes to present their
comments to the HARC. A speaker may allot their time to another speaker for a maximum time
of six (6) minutes. Upon closing of the public hearing, the HARC will deliberate and discuss the
case, and vote to take final action on the application.
It is important to note that the HARC may only consider and take action on the specific items
presented before them; any new or additional item(s) will require the submittal of a new
application, or postponement of the current application so it may be amended and rescheduled
at a future public hearing. In both cases, new public notification will be required.
The HARC may approve, approve with conditions, or deny the request by a majority vote of all
members of the HARC; a minimum of four (4) votes is required to approve a CDC. Should the
request be approved or approved with conditions, the applicant may proceed to obtain the
necessary approvals to complete the project (i.e. Building Permit). When applicable, the
conditions of the CDC must be met within the time frame established by the HARC.
However, should the request be denied, no application for the same project may be considered
within one hundred eighty (180) days of the date the request was denied by the HARC. In this
CB 112 – CDC Process Page 6 of 7
Issued: May 6, 2014
case, the applicant may submit a design for a new project or revised design that substantially
responds to the reasons for denial.
Approved CDCs will expire if no work is commenced within twenty-four (24) months from the
date of the approval.
Any person aggrieved by the HARC’s final decision on a CDC may appeal to the City Council
within thirty (30) days in accordance with Section 3.13.0110 of the UDC.
For information on the HARC’s role on a CDC for Demolition or Relocation of a Historic
Structure, please refer to Customer Bulletin 113.
Approval Criteria
UDC Section 3.13.030 establishes the approval criteria for all CDC requests. City staff and the
HARC must use the criteria outlined in this Section to determine whether to grant a CDC.
Additionally, any property within the boundaries of the Districts must also meet the standards
set forth in the UDC and the Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines.
Postponed Cases
An applicant may postpone a case by submitting a written request to the Historic Planner prior
to the posting of the HARC meeting agenda, or by making the request before the HARC at the
dais in the event that the agenda has already been posted. When the applicant is ready to move
forward with the postponed application, the request will be placed on the next available HARC
Public Hearing. In addition, the applicant will be responsible for obtaining from the Planning
Department and placing on the posted public notice sign a revised notification with the new
hearing date no less than fifteen (15) days prior to the new scheduled hearing.
Continued Cases
At the HARC Public Hearing, the HARC or applicant may request a continuance to the next
regularly scheduled meeting, which allows the request to be considered at a future date without
incurring additional fees or re-notification requirements. Cases may only be continued under
limited circumstances, such as the applicant wishing to submit new and/or additional
information, or revise the request or plans to show an alternate design.
It should be noted that the HARC must make a final action within forty-five (45) days of the
public hearing, unless the applicant agrees to extend the time. Thus, when requesting a
continuance, please note that all requests must be to a date certain of a regularly scheduled
HARC meeting, as agreed by both the HARC and applicant.
Application Withdrawal
An applicant may withdraw an application at any time during the CDC process, prior to the
request being called forward for consideration at the HARC Public Hearing. Please note that if a
request to withdraw the application is received after an application is deemed complete, all
paid application fees will be forfeited.
CB 112 – CDC Process Page 7 of 7
Issued: May 6, 2014
REFERENCES AND RESOURCES
The following is a list of additional resources available to provide guidance on historic
buildings and sites, as well as design guidelines and preservation:
• City of Georgetown Downtown Master Plan - https://historic.georgetown.org/downtown-
master-plan
• City of Georgetown Unified Development Code - https://udc.georgetown.org/unified-
development-code
• City of Georgetown Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines -
https://historic.georgetown.org/downtown-design-guidelines
• National Alliance of Preservation Commissions - http://napc.uga.edu
• National Trust for Historic Preservation - www.preservationnation.org
• National Main Street - www.mainstreet.org
• Texas Historical Commission - www.thc.state.tx.us
• Texas Main Street - www.thc.state.tx.us/preserve/projects-and-programs/texas-main-street
• Georgetown Heritage Society - www.georgetownheritagesociety.com
• American Planning Association - www.planning.org
CB 113 – CDC for Demolition or Relocation of a Structure Process Page 1 of 7
Issued: May 6, 2014
TO: Planning and Downtown and Community Services departments Customers
SUBJECT: Customer Bulletin #113 – The Certificate of Design Compliance (“CDC”) for
Demolition or Relocation of a Structure Process
DATE: May 6, 2014
This Customer Bulletin was created as a customer service initiative on the Certificate of Design
Compliance (“CDC”) for Demolition or Relocation of a Structure process to provide a guide to
property and business owners located within the Downtown and Old Town Overlay districts,
or that own a building listed in the City’s List of Priority Structures (Historic Resources Survey).
This Customer Bulletin does not apply to requests for the demolition of a non-historic accessory
structure.
A location map of each overlay district and of properties listed in the Historic Resources Survey
may be viewed online using the City’s interactive online maps located at
https://maps.georgetown.org/interactive-maps/ (Geoguide: Historic Resources Survey Map).
Information available includes the district boundaries, as well as a structure’s level of priority,
construction year, archite ct, architectural style and building materials.
For questions and further information, please contact the Historic Planner at (512) 930-3581.
THE CDC FOR DEMOLITION OR RELOCATION OF A STRUCTURE PROCESS
Section 3.13 of the City’s Unified Development Code (“UDC”) outlines the applicability,
regulations, review process, and approval criteria of a CDC for Demolition or Relocation of a
Structure. The UDC may be viewed online at https://udc.georgetown.org/unified-development-
code/.
In accordance with UDC Sections 3.13.010(B) and (D)(1), a CDC is required to demolish or
relocate a structure that is in the Downtown or Old Town Overlay Districts, or that is on the
City’s List of Priority Structures (Historic Resources Survey).
The CDC for Demolition or Relocation of a Structure process takes approximately sixty (60)
days from application submittal to final decision (see attached EXHIBIT). However, please note
CB 113 – CDC for Demolition or Relocation of a Structure Process Page 2 of 7
Issued: May 6, 2014
that projects that require further review may require additional processing time. All CDCs for a
demolition or relocation will be reviewed and approved by the Historic and Architectural
Review Commission (“HARC”).
Please be advised that any development or modification to a property or structure located in
one of the historic districts must comply with the applicable UDC regulations and should be
consistent with the Downtown and Old Town Guidelines, as amended, even when a CDC is not
required for the proposed scope of work. For additional information on other CDC applications
and processes, please refer to Customer Bulletin 112 available online at
https://planning.georgetown.org/planning-department-correspondence/.
Pre-Application Conference
Prior to submitting a CDC for Demolition or Relocation of a Structure application, a request for
a Pre-Application Conference must be completed and submitted to the Planning Department to
schedule a meeting with appropriate staff members. Pre-Application Conference Request forms
may be submitted in person at 300-1 Industrial Avenue, or via email at
planning@georgetown.org. The purpose of this meeting is to provide an applicant the
opportunity to present the proposed project to City Staff, and obtain the City’s professional
opinion and input on potential code requirements and procedures that an applicant must
undertake to complete the project. There is no fee associated with a request for a Pre-
Application Conference. Additional information about the Pre-Application Conference may be
found in Customer Bulletin 109 available online at http://planning.georgetown.org/planning-
department-correspondence/.
When completing the request form, it is highly recommended that the applicant provide as
much detail and information as possible. Once the Pre-Application Conference is complete, an
applicant will have up to ninety (90) days from the date of the staff comments and signature(s)
to submit the related applications or a new Pre-Application Conference will be required. The
Pre-Application Conference Request form is available online at
http://udc.georgetown.org/development-manual/.
HARC Demolition Subcommittee Pre-Application Conference
In addition to the Pre-Application Conference with staff referenced above, the applicant must
meet with the HARC Demolition Subcommittee prior to submitting the application. The
purpose of this meeting is to establish the minimum submission requirements to be included in
the application for a CDC for Demolition or Relocation of a Structure . A site visit may be
completed during this meeting if deemed necessary. All required Pre-Application conferences
may be scheduled simultaneously and do not require consideration by one prior to the other.
When completing the request form, it is highly recommended that the applicant include with
the Pre-Application Conference Request form one (1) digital copy of the detailed scope of work,
photographs of the structure and site, and other supporting documents that detail the structural
and historical condition of the structure to be demolished or relocated. This information should
be submitted in advance so that it may be distributed to the Subcommittee and staff members
prior to the meeting.
CB 113 – CDC for Demolition or Relocation of a Structure Process Page 3 of 7
Issued: May 6, 2014
HARC Pre-Application Conceptual Review
If a structure is proposed to be relocated within a historic overlay district, a CDC for the
structure to be relocated may be required. Likewise, if the structure to be demolished or
relocated will be replaced by a new structure, a CDC for the new structure may be required.
When applicable, requirement of a CDC prior to approval of a CDC for Demolition or
Relocation will be determined by the HARC Demolition Subcommittee at the Pre-Application
Conference. In this event, the conceptual review by the HARC will be required. Please refer to
Customer Bulletin 112 for additional information on the process of other CDC applications.
Application Submittal
In order to facilitate the application submittal process, completed applications may be
submitted at any time. Submittal of a complete application includes the Application Form, all
supporting documents as listed in the application checklist including those required by the
HARC Demolition Subcommittee , and applicable fees. The application must be submitted a
minimum of sixty (60) days prior to a scheduled HARC Public Hearing. This is to allow for
sufficient time to review the application, create the HARC staff report and packet, and comply
with the public notice requirements of UDC Section 3.03, as well as the City’s Certified Local
Government (CLG) Program Certification Agreement.
Completeness Review
Upon receipt of an application, City Staff will review all submitted information within five (5)
working days to determine if the minimum items needed for proper review (submittal
requirements) are present in the application packet. In the event the application is deemed
incomplete, a list of missing items will be provided to the applicant in writing. Additionally,
the request will be placed on hold and not scheduled for consideration by the HARC until such
time the missing items are submitted and the application is deemed complete. When the
application is deemed complete, the request will proceed to technical review, and be placed on
the next available HARC Public Hearing agenda.
CLG Delay Period and Public Notice
Per the City’s CLG Program Certification Agreement, all demolition requests require a 60-day
delay period prior to the issuance of a demolition permit. The purpose of this delay period is to
allow the opportunity to reach a satisfactory resolution that preserves the structure while
addressing the property owner’s individual rights. As part of this effort, a sign must be posted
on site to give notification to the public, and allow the public the opportunity to propose
alternatives for preserving or relocating the existing structure. Signs will be provided by the
Historic Planner after the application is deemed complete. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to post the sign on the subject property; the sign must be kept until the end of the 60-
day delay period, which may be after the HARC final action.
CB 113 – CDC for Demolition or Relocation of a Structure Process Page 4 of 7
Issued: May 6, 2014
Technical Review
Technical review of the application consists of the review of the request to determine if and how
the proposed scope of work meets the approval criteria outlined in the UDC and the Downtown
and Old Town Design Guidelines, when applicable. City staff may contact the applicant to
obtain additional information, further clarification or revisions of the plans if deemed necessary.
Please be advised that a site visit may be completed by staff during this time. Staff will draft a
recommendation to the HARC as part of the staff report that is written during this stage of the
review process.
Public Notification
In accordance with Section 3.03.010(D) of the UDC, all CDC applications require public
notification. Each applicant is required to post public notice of the CDC application on the
property no less than fifteen (15) days prior to the scheduled HARC public hearing. The public
notice to post on the property will be provided by City Staff and may be picked-up at the
Planning Department, located at 300-1 Industrial Avenue, Georgetown, Texas 78626. City Staff
will notify the applicant when the sign(s) is(are) ready for pick-up. Please note that public
notice signs must be kept on the property until final action is made by the HARC, as
applicable. It is the responsibility of the applicant to remove the sign(s) after the HARC takes
final action.
HARC
The HARC Public Hearing includes the presentation of the staff recommendation, explanation
of the proposed scope of work by the applicant and/or property owner [up to ten (10) minutes],
and public comments in support or in opposition of the request. During the public hearing, each
constituent that signs up to speak on the request will have three (3) minutes to present their
comments to the HARC. A speaker may allot their time to another speaker for a maximum time
of six (6) minutes. Upon closing of the public hearing, the HARC will deliberate and discuss the
case, and vote to take final action on the application.
The HARC may approve, approve with conditions, or deny the request by a majority vote of all
members of the HARC; a minimum of four (4) votes is required to approve a CDC for
Demolition or Relocation of a Structure. Should the request be approved or approved with
conditions, the applicant must meet the post-demolition requirements outlined in UDC Section
3.13.070 (see Post-requirements section below), and may proceed to apply for the necessary
approvals to complete the project (i.e. Demolition Permit). When applicable, the conditions of
the CDC must be met within the time frame established by the HARC.
However, should the request be denied, the demolition delay period outlined in UDC Section
3.13.010(D)(2) will come into effect. The HARC may impose conditions to be met during the
delay period, the extent of which will be determined by the HARC (see UDC’s Demolition
delay period below).
Please note that applications for a CDC for Demolition or Relocation of a Structure submitted
based on no economically viable use of the property exists, will be presented to the HARC at a public
CB 113 – CDC for Demolition or Relocation of a Structure Process Page 5 of 7
Issued: May 6, 2014
hearing within forty-five (45) days of the date the application is deemed complete. The purpose
of this public hearing is to select the HARC’s appointee to the Economic Review Panel [please
refer to UDC Section 3.13.020(G) for additional information on the Panel’s review process]. The
proposed appointee will be forwarded to City Council at their next available meeting for
confirmation. If the City Council does not agree with the selected appointee, it will designate
the panel representative for the HARC. The HARC will hold a public hearing within forty-five
(45) days of the hearing held by the Economic Review Panel, and approve or deny the request.
Approved CDCs will expire if a Demolition Permit is not issued, or work authorized by the
CDC is not commenced within one hundred eighty (180) days.
Any person aggrieved by the HARC’s final decision on a CDC for Demolition or Relocation of a
Structure may appeal to the City Council within thirty (30) days in accordance with UDC
Section 3.13.0110.
Approval Criteria
UDC Section 3.13.030 establishes the approval criteria for all CDC requests; UDC Section
3.13.040 establishes the supplemental approval criteria specifically for a CDC for Demolition or
Relocation of a Structure request. The HARC must use the criteria outline in these sections to
determine whether to grant a CDC for Demolition or Relocation of a Structure. Additionally,
the HARC must make the applicable findings specified in UDC Section 3.13.040(D), which
varies depending on the justification and basis of the demolition request as determined by the
applicant.
Post-requirements for an APPROVED CDC for Demolition or Relocation of a Structure
In accordance with Section 3.13.070 of the UDC, once a CDC for Demolition or Relocation of a
Structure is approved, the applicant must complete a set of requirements with the purpose of
documenting the structure to be demolished and its historical features, to include construction
style and materials. Additionally, the applicant and Historic Planner will assess the structure to
determine any materials that may be salvaged and 1) use on the new (proposed) structure, or 2)
use on other preservation and restoration activities. The proposed plan for salvageable
materials must be reviewed and approved by the Historic Planner prior to the issuance of a
demolition permit.
UDC’s Demolition Delay Period (DENIED CDCs)
In accordance with UDC Section 3.13.010(D), if a CDC for Demolition or Relocation of a
Structure is denied, a demolition delay period will come into effect that prohibits the demolition
of the structure for an established period of time as determined by the HARC. The purpose of
the delay period is to find an alternative to demolition or relocation of the structure. The delay
period will depend on the (historic) priority level; however, this period may not exceed the
maximum number of days established by the UDC (175 for low priority structures, and 365
days for medium and high priority structures). During the delay period, the applicant must
meet a set of conditions as established in the UDC (please refer to Section 3.13.050), as well as
any additional conditions imposed by the HARC.
CB 113 – CDC for Demolition or Relocation of a Structure Process Page 6 of 7
Issued: May 6, 2014
At the end of the delay period or when all the conditions have been met by the applicant, the
request will be placed on the next regularly scheduled HARC meeting for final action. The
applicant will be notified of the scheduled hearing date, and provided with the public notice
signs to be posted on site no less than fifteen (15) days prior to the scheduled meeting.
Postponed Cases
An applicant may postpone a case by submitting a written request to the Historic Planner prior
to the posting of the HARC meeting agenda, or by making the request before the HARC at the
dais in the event that the agenda has already been posted. When the applicant is ready to move
forward with the postponed application, the request will be placed on the next available HARC
public hearing. In addition, the applicant will be responsible for obtaining from the Planning
Department and placing on the posted public notice sign a revised notification with the new
hearing date no later than fifteen (15) days prior to the new scheduled hearing.
Continued Cases
At the HARC Public Hearing, the HARC or applicant may request a continuance to the next
regularly scheduled meeting, which allows the request to be considered at a future date without
incurring additional fees or re-notification requirements. Cases may only be continued under
limited circumstances, such as the applicant wishing to submit new and/or additional
information, or revise the request or plans to show an alternate design.
It should be noted that the HARC must make a final action within forty-five (45) days of the
public hearing, unless the applicant agrees to extend the time. Thus, when requesting a
continuance, please note that all requests must be to a date certain of a regularly scheduled
HARC meeting, as agreed by both the HARC and applicant.
Application Withdrawal
An applicant may withdraw an application at any time during the CDC for Demolition or
Relocation of a Structure process, prior to the request being called forward for consideration at
the HARC Public Hearing. Please note that if a request to withdraw the application is received
after an application is deemed complete, all paid application fees will be forfeited.
REFERENCES AND RESOURCES
The following is a list of additional resources available to provide guidance on historic
buildings and sites, as well as design guidelines and preservation:
• City of Georgetown Downtown Master Plan - https://historic.georgetown.org/downtown-
master-plan
• City of Georgetown Unified Development Code - https://udc.georgetown.org/unified-
development-code
• City of Georgetown Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines -
https://historic.georgetown.org/downtown-design-guidelines
CB 113 – CDC for Demolition or Relocation of a Structure Process Page 7 of 7
Issued: May 6, 2014
• National Alliance of Preservation Commissions - http://napc.uga.edu
• National Trust for Historic Preservation - www.preservationnation.org
• National Main Street - www.mainstreet.org
• Texas Historical Commission - www.thc.state.tx.us
• Texas Main Street - www.thc.state.tx.us/preserve/projects-and-programs/texas-main-street
• Georgetown Heritage Society - www.georgetownheritagesociety.com American Planning
Association - www.planning.org
EXHIBIT—CDC for Demolition or Relocation of a Structure Review Process Flowchart ₍overview₎
Pre-Application Conference
Prior to submitting a CDC application, a Pre-Application Conference is
required. The purpose of the meeting is to go over the project with City
staff from various Departments to obtain information and guidance on
applicable requirements and procedures. Pre-Application Conferences
are valid for up to 90 days.
HARC Pre-Application Conceptual Review
If a CDC is required for a new structure, or existing structure to be
relocated in the District, a conceptual review by the HARC will be
required prior to submitting a CDC application for the new/relocated
structure.
CDC Application Submittal
Complete applications may be submitted at any time (no application
deadline). For applications that require HARC consideration, it is
recommended that applications are submitted at least 30 days prior to
the scheduled public hearing. Complete applications will be scheduled
for the next available scheduled HARC meeting.
Completeness Review
Within 5 working days from receipt of an application, City
staff will review the submitted information to determine if the
minimum items needed for review were included in the
packet. An incomplete application will be placed on hold until
it is deemed complete for processing.
Technical Review
When an application is deemed complete, staff will review the request to
determine if it complies with the UDC’s approval criteria and the
Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines. Additional information or
revisions may be requested of the applicant. A site visit may also be
completed during this time.
Applicant revises application & plans
Proposed project must comply with all applicable
requirements of the UDC and Guidelines. If
necessary, revised plans or additional information
may be required.
Public Notice
All CDCs require public notification. No less than 15 days prior to the
meeting, City staff will provide the applicant a public notice sign to be
posted on site. Public notice signs must be kept on site until final action
(determination) is made on the request or 5 days after the public hearing.
HARC
Public Hearing
Final action must be taken
within 45 days of public
hearing.
Post-Approval requirements:
1) Document existing structure and historic
resources
2) Create a salvage strategy for the reuse of building
materials (to be approved by the Historic Planner)
3) Plant (landscape) and maintain the property, if
applicable
Demolition Delay Period
Structure may not be demolished during the established
delayed period. Additionally, any conditions established by
the HARC must be met.
Appeal Decision to City Council
Request for an appeal must be submitted to the
Planning Department within 30 days of HARC’s
decision.
Applicant addresses missing information
If an application is deemed incomplete, a list of
missing items will be provided to the applicant in
writing, and the request will not proceed to
Technical Review until all items are submitted.
INCOMPLETE
COMPLETE
DENIED
APPROVED
Staff Recommendation
For CDCs that require HARC consideration, staff will draft a
recommendation to the HARC. Agendas with staff reports and
recommendations will be posted online the Friday before the scheduled
public hearing.
HARC Demolition Subcommittee Pre-Application Conference
CDC for Demolition or Relocation of a Structure requires a Pre-Application
Conference with the HARC Demolition Subcommittee to establish the
minimum application submittal requirements. A site visit may be completed
if deemed necessary.
CLG Delay Period and Public Notice
All demolition requests require a 60-day delay period prior to
the issuance of a demolition permit per the City’s CLG Program
Certification Agreement. Signs must be posted on site during
this period to allow the public to propose alternatives for
preserving the existing structure .
HARC (re)consideration
Upon completion of the
delay period, the HARC will
reconsider the request to
determine if the conditions
have been met.
Proceed to obtain Demolition Permit,
Site Plan, Building Permit, etc., as required
for proposed project
APPROVED
DENIED
Appeal Decision to City Council
Request for an appeal must be submitted to the
Planning Department within 30 days of decision.
DENIED
CB 113 - CDC for Demolition or Relocation of a Structure Process
Issued: May 6, 2014
CB 114 – CDC Application Submittal Requirements Page 1 of 10
Issued: May 8, 2014
TO: Planning and Downtown and Community Services departments Customers
SUBJECT: Customer Bulletin #114 – Procedures for completing and submitting a Certificate
of Design Compliance (“CDC”) Application (Submittal Requirements)
DATE: May 8, 2014
This Customer Bulletin was created as a customer service initiative to provide a guide to
property and business owners located within the Downtown and Old Town Overlay Districts,
or that own a building listed in the City’s List of Priority Structures (Historic Resources Survey)
on the application submittal requirements when requesting a Certificate of Design Compliance
(“CDC”).
A location map of each overlay district and of properties listed in the Historic Resources Survey
may be viewed online using the City’s interactive online maps located at
https://maps.georgetown.org/interactive-maps/ (Geoguide: Historic Resources Survey Map).
Information available includes the district boundaries, as well as a structure’s level of priority,
construction year, architect, architectural style and building materials.
For questions and further information, please contact the Historic Planner at (512) 930-3581.
APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
Please refer to the table below to determine the materials required for a specific type of CDC
request. The application may not move forward until all required information is provided
and the application is deemed complete.
The applicability of each type of request will be based on the applicable Overlay District as
determined in the UDC, in the Pre-Application Conference with staff and the Demolition
Subcommittee when applicable, and application checklists. Please refer to Customer Bulletins
112: The CDC Process, and 113: The CDC for Demolition or Relocation of a Structure Process,
for additional information. Customer Bulletins are available online at
https://planning.georgetown.org/planning-department-correspondence/.
CB 114 – CDC Application Submittal Requirements Page 2 of 10
Issued: May 8, 2014
TYPE OF REQUEST
LEV
E
L
O
F
REV
I
E
W
HA
R
C
PRE
-APP
L
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
CON
C
E
P
T
U
A
L
REV
I
E
W
HA
R
C
SUB
C
O
M
M
I
T
T
E
E
REV
I
E
W
/A
PP
R
O
V
A
L
APP
L
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
FOR
M
CD
C
CHE
C
K
L
I
S
T
SIG
N
E
D
SUB
M
I
T
T
A
L
AUT
H
O
R
I
Z
A
T
I
O
N
FOR
M
LET
T
E
R
O
F
INT
E
N
T
SIT
E DES
I
G
N
(P
LO
T
) PLA
N
LAN
D
S
C
A
P
E
PLA
N
ARC
H
I
T
E
C
T
U
R
A
L
DRA
W
I
N
G
S
(E
LE
V
A
T
I
O
N
S
)
ARC
H
I
T
E
C
T
U
R
A
L
DRA
W
I
N
G
S
(F
LO
O
R
PLA
N
S
)
SPE
C
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
A
N
D
DET
A
I
L
S
REN
D
E
R
I
N
G
S
MAT
E
R
I
A
L
(S) SAM
P
L
E
S
PHO
T
O
G
R
A
P
H
S
OTH
E
R
INF
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
APP
L
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
FEE
(IN
C
L
U
D
E
S
TE
C
H
N
I
C
A
L
F
E
E
)
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q
Awnings and Canopies HARC * * * * * * * * * * $160
Demolition of a Historic
Resource; or removal of a
building façade with street
frontage
HARC * * * * ~ * ~ * ~ $160
Demolition or Relocation of a
Historic Structure HARC ~ * * * * * * ~ * * $160
Demolition of a Non-Historic
Accessory Structure Staff * * * * * * * $160
Exterior Building Alterations
(<5,000 sq.ft.) HARC ~ * * * * * * ~ * * * * ~ $160
Exterior Building Alterations
(>5,000 sq.ft.) HARC ~ * * * * * * ~ * * * * ~ $265
Exterior Site Alterations HARC ~ * * * * * ~ * ~ * * ~ $160
Exterior Paint Color HARC * * * * * * * * * $31
Exterior Paint Color
(Residential in Downtown
Overlay District)
Staff * * * * * * * * * $31
Fence (Residential) Staff * * * * * * ~ * $31
Fence (Non-Residential) HARC * * * * * * * * $31
Landscaping Staff * * * * * * * $160
New Construction - Additions HARC ~ * * * * * * ~ * ~ * * ~ $265
New Construction - Infill HARC * * * * * * * * ~ * * ~ $265
Signage HARC * * * * * * * * * * * $31
LEGEND: [*] ITEM IS REQUIRED [~] ITEM MAY BE REQUIRED (TO BE DETERMINED AT THE PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE)
A copy of the application form and all supporting documents (exhibits, drawings, photos,
etc.) must be submitted on a compact disc (CD) or USB flash drive in PDF format (maximum
file size 50MB; 300 dpi resolution; no layers, digital signatures or passwords).
Master Application form, signed Submittal Authorization Form and Checklist must be saved
as one PDF file; letter of intent, plans, specification of details, renderings and photographs
must be saved as a second separate PDF file (only two (2) files on CD or drive). Each required
set of documents must be appropriately labeled as specified in the application checklist.
CDs or drives must be clearly labeled with the project name on the outside.
Required plans do not need to be prepared, signed or sealed by a licensed architect or
registered engineer for the CDC application process. Plans may be hand drawn provided
they are legible, to scale and with dimensions, and properly labeled.
CB 114 – CDC Application Submittal Requirements Page 3 of 10
Issued: May 8, 2014
A. LEVEL OF REVIEW
CDC applications that are related to landscaping, residential fences, exterior paint colors of
residential properties in the Downtown Overlay District, and demolition of a non-historic
accessory structure will be reviewed and considered administratively (Administrative
CDCs). All other CDC applications will be reviewed and considered by the Historic and
Architectural Review Commission (“HARC”) for final action. In all cases, a public notice of
the CDC application will be posted on the property.
B. HARC PRE-APPLICATION CONCEPTUAL REVIEW
Materials to be submitted for Conceptual Review should include, at a minimum, Letter of
Intent, preliminary Site Plan and Architectural Drawings, Specification of Materials, and
Photographs. Materials for the conceptual review must be submitted at least seven (7) days
before the regularly scheduled HARC meeting. There is no fee for a Conceptual Review. For
additional information on the HARC Pre-Application Conceptual Review, please refer to
Customer Bulletins 112 and 113.
C. HARC SUBCOMMITTEE REVIEW OR APPROVAL
CDC Applications for signage are reviewed and approved by the HARC Sign
Subcommittee, unless the Subcommittee determines that the request requires review and
consideration from the HARC (full commission). Applications to be considered by the
HARC Sign Subcommittee will follow the same review process and timeline as other CDC
applications (the HARC Sign Subcommittee meets twice a month for expediency).
CDC Applications for Demolition of Relocation of a Structure require a Pre-Application
meeting with the HARC Demolition Subcommittee to establish the minimum submission
application requirements for the application. When submitting a request for the HARC
Demolition Subcommittee Pre-Application meeting, one (1) digital copy of the detailed
scope of work, photographs, and other supporting documents (i.e. details of the structural
and historical condition of the structure to be demolished or relocated) must be submitted
with the Pre-Application Conference request form. Please be advised that the minimum
requirements established in this meeting must be submitted with the CDC Application for
Demolition or Relocation of a Structure for processing. Please see Other Requirements (Item
P) below. For additional information on the demolition or relocation process, please refer to
Customer Bulletin 113.
D. APPLICATION FORM
All fields of the application form must be completed accurately and signed by the applicant
and/or property owner. All applicable information must be legibly printed or typed for
processing. Incomplete application forms will not be accepted. Please be advised that any
inaccurate information may cause a delay in processing the request.
Required property information such as the legal description of the property may be found
in the Williamson County Appraisal District’s website at http://www.wcad.org/property-
CB 114 – CDC Application Submittal Requirements Page 4 of 10
Issued: May 8, 2014
search. Historic, Zoning and City Council district information may be found in the City’s
interactive map website at https://maps.georgetown.org/interactive-maps/.
E. CDC CHECKLIST
The applicant must complete the CDC Checklist acknowledging submittal of all required
documents. The application may not move forward or be scheduled for a public hearing
until all required information is provided and the application is deemed complete.
F. SIGNED SUBMITTAL AUTHORIZATION FORM
A signed copy of the Submittal Authorization Form and staff notes provided at the Pre-
Application Conference must be included in the submittal packet.
G. LETTER OF INTENT
A detailed description of the proposed construction, external changes or signage, and how it
meets the Design Guidelines and applicable UDC requirements must be included with the
submittal packet. For applications with multiple items (landscaping, signage, paint,
addition, etc.), each item being sought must be included as a part of the application.
H. SITE DESIGN (PLOT) PLAN
Site Design or Plot plans must be dated, drawn to scale and have north arrows and
directional labels. In addition, Site Plans must include the following information:
Graphic Scale
Dimensions of the site and all improvements, to include setbacks (existing and
proposed) and building separation
Location of property lines, streets, walkways, parking, driveways, mechanical
equipment, fences, and other hardscape features.
Existing and proposed buildings and additions
Portion(s) of structure to be demolished (if applicable)
Location and dimensions of existing and proposed signage
* For a CDC for Demolition or Relocation of a Structure application, the Site Design (Plot)
Plan must be a post-demolition site plan addressing what will be developed on the site
after the demolition or removal of the existing structure is complete.
CB 114 – CDC Application Submittal Requirements Page 5 of 10
Issued: May 8, 2014
DISCLAIMER: Please note that the drawing above is only for reference purposes on information and details that must be included
on a Site Design (Plot) Plan, and does not necessarily show compliance with applicable requirements of the UDC, Downtown and
Old Town Design Guidelines, or building codes. For other graphic samples, please refer to the Downtown and Old Town Design
Guidelines.
I. LANDSCAPE PLAN
Landscape plans must be dated, drawn to scale and have north arrows and directional
labels. In addition, Landscape Plans must include the following information:
Graphic Scale
Dimensions of the site and landscape improvements
Location of property lines, streets, walkways, driveways, and other landscape features
Existing and proposed buildings and additions
Proposed plantings with corresponding legend
Non-residential planting requirements summary table
Calculation formulas for each landscaping requirement
List of species, sizes and quantities of all plantings
CB 114 – CDC Application Submittal Requirements Page 6 of 10
Issued: May 8, 2014
J. ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS (ELEVATIONS)
Elevation of each building façade must be dated, drawn to scale and have directional labels.
In addition, Elevations must include the following information:
Graphic Scale
Dimensions of the building and architectural features, to include overall building height,
width and depth of doors, windows and other openings
Materials
Roof Pitch
Types of windows, doors and dormers (i.e. aluminum, vinyl, wood, one over one, etc.)
Location and dimensions of existing and proposed signage
* For a CDC for Demolition or Relocation of a Structure application, the Elevation must be a
post-demolition elevation addressing what will be developed on the site after the
demolition or removal of the existing structure is complete.
DISCLAIMER: Please note that the drawing above is only for reference purposes on information and details that must be included
on an Elevation, and does not necessarily show compliance with applicable requirements of the UDC, Downtown and Old Town
Design Guidelines, or building codes. For other graphic samples, please refer to the Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines.
K. ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS (FLOOR PLANS)
Floor Plans must be dated, drawn to scale and have directional labels. In addition, Floor
Plans must include the following information:
Graphic Scale
Dimensions of the building and openings on exterior walls
Room Labels
Proposed alterations (if applicable)
CB 114 – CDC Application Submittal Requirements Page 7 of 10
Issued: May 8, 2014
DISCLAIMER: Please note that the drawing above is only for reference purposes on information and details that must be included
on a Floor Plan, and does not necessarily show compliance with applicable requirements of the UDC, Downtown and Old Town
Design Guidelines, or building codes. For other graphic samples, please refer to the Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines.
L. SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS
Specifications and details of architectural features, doors and windows, lighting, signage
and other applicable hardscape and landscape features and improvements must be included
in the submittal packet. Details must be dated, drawn to scale and labeled accordingly. All
details must include dimensions, materials, type, color, and proposed location.
For proposed replacement and/or installation of windows, doors, dormers, awnings or
shutters, please provide a window and door opening schedule. The schedule should consist
of a sketch of each floor and/or elevation of the structure with openings clearly defined as
existing in terms of quantity, size, style and material corresponding appropriately to a
proposed window and door schedule as a result of the requested action.
CB 114 – CDC Application Submittal Requirements Page 8 of 10
Issued: May 8, 2014
Source: Building Elevation – City of Georgetown Downtown and Old Town Design Guidelines.
DISCLAIMER: Please note that the drawing above is only for reference purposes on information that must be included on
specifications and details, and does not necessarily show compliance with applicable requirements of the UDC, Downtown and Old
Town Design Guidelines, or building codes. For other graphic samples, please refer to the Downtown and Old Town Design
Guidelines.
M. RENDERINGS
A three-dimensional sketch or drawing of the Street View or Street Elevation must be
included with the submittal packet. All renderings provided shall be an accurate
representation of the property and any proposed changes.
N. MATERIAL(S) SAMPLES
Fifteen (15) samples of each material to be used in the proposed scope of work, to include
paint color chips must be submitted with the application. All color renderings and samples
must be an accurate representation of the proposed or existing color. In the event that
material samples are not available (i.e. materials for a proposed type of stone or brick),
photographs or catalog pictures and specifications identifying the proposed material may be
submitted. Each (set of) sample must be submitted in an 8” by 10” envelope with the name
of the project and property address written on the top right corner of the envelope.
CB 114 – CDC Application Submittal Requirements Page 9 of 10
Issued: May 8, 2014
O. PHOTOGRAPHS
Photographs of all sides of the structure and site, as well as of the sign structure and all
other improvements must be included in the submittal packet. Photographs must be in color
and no smaller than 4” by 6”.
P. OTHER REQUIREMENTS
These types of applications must include the following information:
Demolition/Relocation of
a Structure
The following items are required:
1) Justification Statement in accordance with UDC Section
3.13.020(D)(1).
2) A post-demolition Site Plan addressing what will be
developed on site.
3) In the event the structure will be relocated in a Historic
District, supporting documentation that addresses the
architectural compatibility of the structure to be relocated
with adjacent buildings; site development standards
according to the Guidelines; and buildings and character of
the district, in accordance with UDC Section 3.13.020(D)(4).
4) Application requirements and additional information as
determined by the HARC Demolition Subcommittee (see
application checklist).
It is also recommended that the following information be
provided:
1) Study, report or assessment on the historic value and
significance of the structure completed by a qualified
Historian, Historic Preservation Architect or Preservation
Consultant.
2) A certified engineer’s report testifying to the structural
condition of the structure.
3) Letters of support from the surrounding property owners.
Demolition of a non-
historic accessory
structure
Documentation identifying the date of construction.
Exterior Building
Alterations (Remodel of
structure)
For substantial rehabilitation and other major projects (50% or
more of the value of the structure), additional
application/submittal requirements as recommended at the
HARC Pre-Application Conceptual Review.
Infill/New Construction Additional application/submittal requirements as recommended
at the HARC Pre-Application Conceptual Review.
CB 114 – CDC Application Submittal Requirements Page 10 of 10
Issued: May 8, 2014
Q. APPLICATION FEE
Required fees must be paid to the City at the time of application submittal. For a detailed list
of application fees, please refer to the Fee Schedule in the UDC’s Development Manual
available online at http://udc.georgetown.org/development-manual/. Applications that are
not accompanied with the appropriate fee will not be accepted by the City. Fees may be
paid in person by check (payable to the City of Georgetown) or credit card, or
arrangements may be made to pay over the phone. The fees for a specific application will
also be noted by staff at the Pre-Application Conference.
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Information and discussion on the conversion to the paperless meeting format (digital agenda
packets).
ITEM SUMMARY:
The City of Georgetown has initiated the process of going paperless and processing development
applications digitally. As part of this effort, City staff will be transitioning Certificate of Design
Compliance (CDC) applications and Historic and Architectural Review Commission (HARC)
agenda packets into a digital format. City staff will be going over the necessary steps to access and
view agenda items, including staff recommendations and supporting materials, that are posted for
HARC review and consideration.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
NA
SUBMITTED BY:
Andreina Dávila-Quintero, Project Coordinator
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Questions and comments from Commissioners in Training.
ITEM SUMMARY:
Questions and comments from Commissioners in Training
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None
SUBMITTED BY:
MCS
City of Georgetown, Texas
SUBJECT:
Staff updates and reminder of future meetings.
ITEM SUMMARY:
Staff updates and reminder of future meetings
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None
SUBMITTED BY:
MCS